+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Whirled Music Pub. v. Costello amended complaint.pdf

Whirled Music Pub. v. Costello amended complaint.pdf

Date post: 06-Jul-2018
Category:
Upload: mark-h-jaffe
View: 221 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 34

Transcript
  • 8/17/2019 Whirled Music Pub. v. Costello amended complaint.pdf

    1/34

     

    1

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    Christopher A. LaVoy (SB# 016609)Tiffany & Bosco, P.A.Seventh Floor Camelback Esplanade II2525 East Camelback RoadPhoenix, Arizona 85016-9240

    Telephone: (602) 255-6000Facsimile: (602) 255-0103E-Mail: [email protected]

    Connie J. Mableson (SB# 010665)Connie J. Mableson, PLLC1938 East Osborn RoadPhoenix, Arizona 85016Telephone: 602-277-8100E-Mail: [email protected]

     Attorneys for Plaintiff

    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

    DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

    Whirled Music Publishing, Inc., an Arizonacorporation,

    Plaintiff,

    v.

    John A. Costello, III and Jennifer Costello,husband and wife,

    Defendants.

    Case No. 2:15-cv-02111-GMS

    FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

    For its Complaint, plaintiff Whirled Music Publishing, Inc. (“Whirled”) alleges as

    follows:

    Overview of Action

    1.  Whirled brings this action for a declaratory judgment confirming its

    ownership of the copyrights to certain music that former employee John A. Costello

    Case 2:15-cv-02111-GMS Document 34 Filed 04/21/16 Page 1 of 34

  • 8/17/2019 Whirled Music Pub. v. Costello amended complaint.pdf

    2/34

     

    2

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    composed for Whirled and/or contributed to Whirled in exchange for shares in the

    corporation. Whirled also sues Costello for trademark infringement.

    The Parties

    2. 

    Plaintiff Whirled is an Arizona corporation with its principal place of

     business in Maricopa County, Arizona.

    3.  Defendants John and Jennifer Costello, husband and wife, reside in Maricopa

    County, Arizona. The Costellos were acting for the benefit of their marital community at

    all times relevant hereto.

    Jurisdiction and Venue

    4. 

    This Court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and

    1338, and pursuant to the doctrine of supplemental jurisdiction.

    5.  Venue is proper in this district under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391 and 1400(a).

    Facts Common to All Counts

    The Formation of Whirled

    6.  In 2002, a small group of talented and respected musicians established

    Whirled primarily to place music in television shows, televised sporting events, and films.

    The company has grown to accumulate and own a large catalogue of music spanning over

    nine decades that is marketed under several genre-specific brands, including Wild Whirled

    Music, Whirled Music, Trailerville Music, Muzik Headz, Fervor Records, Vintage

    Masters, Fervor Records Vintage Masters, and Cue Sheet Music. The company represents

    hundreds of songwriters and composers worldwide. 

    7.  Whirled licenses its music in its catalogue for a fee and the right to receive

    “performance royalties.” A “performance royalty” is paid every time a song is played.

    Publishers and songwriters register with a performance rights organizations (“PROs”) such

    as Broadcast Music, Inc. (“BMI”) to collect performance royalties on their behalf. PROs

    like BMI pay the music publishing company and songwriters based on the actual use of the

    Case 2:15-cv-02111-GMS Document 34 Filed 04/21/16 Page 2 of 34

  • 8/17/2019 Whirled Music Pub. v. Costello amended complaint.pdf

    3/34

     

    3

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    compositions. Once a composition is registered with the PRO, no changes can be made to

    that registration without the consent of the music publishing company and all of the

    songwriters.

    8. 

    Whirled’s shareholders include John Costello and David Hilker, each holding

    26.323% of the company’s shares and both sitting on its board. Hilker is also the

    company’s CEO and President. Costello was formerly its Secretary.

    9.  Hilker and Costello are longtime musical collaborators and business partners.

    They received their respective shares in Whirled in exchange for contributing the

    copyrights and publishing interests to certain musical compositions and related sound

    recordings they jointly held through a pre-existing co-author agreement and several pre-

    existing partnership(s). Such contribution is described in the May 20, 2002 minutes of

    Whirled’s first board meeting (see Exhibit 1).

    10.  Whirled’s catalogue generally consists of musical compositions and sound

    recordings contributed at Whirled’s formation by Hilker and Costello through their several

     pre-existing partnerships; music composed and sound recordings produced by staff

    songwriters, including until recently Costello; and music acquired by copyright assignment

    from third-parties, often through catalogue acquisitions.

    Costello’s Employment as a Staff Songwriter

    11.  Costello was among the musicians who started Whirled and a full-time staff

    songwriter at the company until his employment was terminated on December 31, 2014.

    12.  Whirled paid Costello an annual salary ($64,500 in 2014) plus granted him a

    “writer’s share” of performance royalties. With respect to the “writer’s share,” Costello and

    Hilker requested that it be split equally between them for the compositions that each solely 

    wrote for Whirled by listing them both as co-writers on such compositions, just as they

    shared attribution and royalties through their pre-existing co-author agreement and their

    several pre-existing partnerships, which Whirled did.

    Case 2:15-cv-02111-GMS Document 34 Filed 04/21/16 Page 3 of 34

  • 8/17/2019 Whirled Music Pub. v. Costello amended complaint.pdf

    4/34

     

    4

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    13.  Costello and Hilker have shared attribution and royalties in this manner for

    nearly thirty years, through their partnership agreements. Whirled listed Costello and

    Hilker as co-writers with BMI on all songs they wrote together or separately pursuant to

    their request and pursuant to their pre-existing co-author agreement and their several pre-

    existing partnerships.

    14.  Whirled’s payroll and tax records, as well as Costello’s own tax records,

    reflect his status as an employee. Whirled paid the employer’s share of FICA withholdings

    for Costello. Whirled also provided Costello valuable employee benefits, including a cell

     phone, musical equipment stipend, vacation pay, a health insurance stipend, and

    contributing to his retirement plan.

    15.  Consistent with the employment relationship, Whirled directed and

    supervised significant aspects of Costello’s work, including specifying musical genres,

    song duration, rhythms, beats, tempos, arrangements, song formats, and other aspects of

    the songwriting process.

    Costello’s Assertion of Copyright Ownership

    16.  For a variety of reasons including significant changes in the music publishing

    industry, Whirled made the difficult decision in late 2015 to eliminate Costello’s

    songwriter position at the company. This did not affect his roles as a shareholder and

    director. The company no longer employs any staff songwriters.

    17.  After Whirled terminated Costello’s employment on December 31, 2014,

    Costello asserted, for the first time, that he was an independent contractor rather than an

    employee. He did this as part of claiming the copyrights to the musical works he composed

    and recorded for Whirled.

    18.  Costello refused multiple requests by Whirled to acknowledge and

    memorialize, in an industry-standard acceptable form and content, the company’s

    ownership of these copyrights.

    Case 2:15-cv-02111-GMS Document 34 Filed 04/21/16 Page 4 of 34

  • 8/17/2019 Whirled Music Pub. v. Costello amended complaint.pdf

    5/34

     

    5

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    19.  With respect to the compositions and sound recordings Costello and Hilker

    contributed for their shares in Whirled through their several pre-existing partnerships,

    Costello has further declined to sign an industry-standard form of written copyright

    assignment vesting copyright ownership for such compositions and sound recordings in

    Whirled, thereby placing a cloud on Whirled’s rights in those compositions and sound

    recordings as well.

    Costello’s Misappropriation of Whirled’s Trademarks

    20.  Whirled owns certain federally registered trademarks and service marks that

    are nationally and internationally recognized in connection with its business, as follows

    (the “Registered Trademarks”):

    MARK Reg. No. Registered First Used Goods & Services

    VINTAGEMASTERS®

    4,322,455 April 16,2013

    July 1, 2007 Music Licensing inFilm, TV, andInternet

    VINTAGEMASTERS®

    4,322,454 April 16,2013

    July 1, 2007 Musical SoundRecordings

    ONE STOP SHOPVINTAGE MASTERS-

    FERVOR RECORDS®

    3,847,410 September14, 2010

    December 2,2009

    Music Licensing inFilm, TV, and

    InternetFERVOR RECORDS™ Serial No.

    86676611Application pending withUSPTO

    January 5,1990

    Musical SoundRecordings

    FERVOR RECORDS™ Serial No.86666822

    Application pending withUSPTO

    January 5,1990

    Music Licensing inFilm, TV, andInternet

    21.  Whirled also owns certain common law trademarks that have been used

    throughout the world, including:

    a. 

    The service mark, WILD WHIRLED MUSIC™ and WHIRLED MUSIC™

    (collectively, the “WWM Trademark”). Whirled does business under the

    WWM Trademark worldwide and has done so continuously since as early as

    2002.

    Case 2:15-cv-02111-GMS Document 34 Filed 04/21/16 Page 5 of 34

  • 8/17/2019 Whirled Music Pub. v. Costello amended complaint.pdf

    6/34

     

    6

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

     b.  The service mark, CUE SHEET MUSIC™ (the “Cue Sheet Music Mark”).

    Whirled, through Trifecta, does business under the Cue Sheet Music Mark

    worldwide and has done so continuously since as early as 2007.

    22. 

    Shortly after Whirled terminated Costello’s employment, and as part of

    setting up his own competing music publishing business (the “Competing Business”),

    Costello purchased the URL www.jc3publishing.com and other domain name URLs

    (uniform resource locators) from the ICANN Register, GoDaddy.com as indicated in the

    following table. In all registrations (including Costello’s main webpage for his Competing

    Business, www.jc3publishing.com), Costello listed “WWM” as the name of the

    “organization” affiliated with the URL. Costello improperly used Whirled’s WWM

    Trademark in his registration to make it appear that Whirled (the “organization”) is

    somehow affiliated or associated with the URL www.jc3publishing.com, which it is not.

    The websites, at almost all of the purchased URLs/domains (as indicated in the following

    table), redirect to Costello’s website at http://jc3publishing.com.

    Date

    Registered

    URL Registered by Costello WWM listed

    as affiliated

    entity?

    Redirected to:

    1/26/15 www.whirledmusicjc3.com Yes http://jc3publishing.com/

    1/26/15 www.jc3publishing.com Yes http://jc3publishing.com/

    1/26/15 www.fervorjc3.com Yes

    1/26/15 www.vintagemastersjc3.com Yes http://jc3publishing.com/

    1/26/15 www.cuesheetmusic.net Yes http://jc3publishing.com/

    1/26/15 www.qsheetrecords.com Yes http://jc3publishing.com/1/26/15 www.cuesheetrecords.com Yes http://jc3publishing.com/

    1/26/15 www.qsheetmusic.org Yes http://jc3publishing.com/

    1/26/15 www.whirledjohncostello.com Yes http://jc3publishing.com/

    Case 2:15-cv-02111-GMS Document 34 Filed 04/21/16 Page 6 of 34

  • 8/17/2019 Whirled Music Pub. v. Costello amended complaint.pdf

    7/34

     

    7

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    1/26/15 www.qsheetmusic.net Yes http://jc3publishing.com/

    1/26/15 www.cuesheetmusic.com Yes

    1/26/15 www.qsheetmusic.com Yes http://jc3publishing.com/

    23. 

    Costello has wrongfully used Whirled’s Registered Trademarks, Cue Sheet

    Music Mark, WWM Trademark, and Whirled’s name in connection with his Competing

    Business.

    24.  The website for Costello’s Competing Business at www.jc3publishing.com

    also contains images of film and TV posters that are intended to deceive and imply that

    Costello, rather than Whirled, placed and licensed the subject compositions and recordings

    in such films and TV programs. Costello was a staff composer of Whirled and played no

    role in such licenses and placements. Such implication is made by Costello to deceive the

    users of film and TV music, including Whirled’s clients and licensees, into thinking that it

    was Costello and not Whirled who was responsible for obtaining said music licenses and

     placements.

    Plaintiff’s Claims

    FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF

    DECLARATORY JUDGMENT REGARDING COPYRIGHT OWNERSHIP

    25.  Whirled re-alleges and incorporates each and every allegation contained in

    the paragraphs above as if fully set forth herein.

    26. 

    There is an actual, substantial and judiciable controversy between Whirled

    and Costello concerning Whirled’s right to license, publish, and otherwise exploit the

    musical works that Costello composed while working for Whirled, as well as the musical

    works he promised to contribute for his shares in Whirled.

    27.  The scope of this controversy was recently significantly narrowed as a result

    of the Amended Declaratory Judgment Order (Doc. 32) entered pursuant to the stipulation

    of the parties. The only musical works composed from January 1, 2004 through December

    Case 2:15-cv-02111-GMS Document 34 Filed 04/21/16 Page 7 of 34

  • 8/17/2019 Whirled Music Pub. v. Costello amended complaint.pdf

    8/34

     

    8

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    31, 2014 that remain at issue in terms of copyright ownership are This Woman, Time

    Heals, and Celebrity. With respect to pre-2004 musical works, the copyright ownership

    dispute focuses on copyright ownership of the musical works that Costello contributed to

    Whirled for his shares and/or composed for Whirled after its formation through December

    31, 2003.

    28.  Whirled is entitled to a judicial declaration that it is the sole owner of the

    copyrights to the musical works that Costello composed for Whirled after its formation

    through December 31, 2003 , as well as This Woman, Time Heals, and Celebrity, based on:

    a.  The musical works being “works made for hire” under an employer-

    employee relationship and therefore Whirled is the sole owner of said

    musical works pursuant to the Copyright Act’s work-for-hire provisions;

     b.  Costello transferring and assigning “all right, title, and interest” in all musical

    works composed for Whirled in the future in the May 20, 2002 minutes of

    Whirled’s first board meeting signed by Costello (see Exhibit 1); and/or

    c.  One or more other notes, memorandums, or instruments of conveyance in

    writing and signed by Costello and/or his duly authorized agents, including

     but not limited to: (i) Production Agreement dated June 13, 2007 but

    effective retroactively as of May 1, 2002 by and between Costello, Hilker,

    another third party author and Whirled; (ii) Production Agreement dated

    October 1, 2008 by and between Costello, Hilker, another third-party author

    and Trifecta Holdings, LLC (“Trifecta”), which is wholly owned by Whirled;

    (iii) Production Agreement dated October 21, 2013 by and between Costello,

    Hilker, and two other third-party authors and Trifecta; (iv) Production

    Agreement dated May 20, 2010 by and between Costello, Hilker, and several

    other third-party authors and Trifecta, as amended by the addendum signed

     by all of the parties dated as of November 20, 2010; (v) Production

    Case 2:15-cv-02111-GMS Document 34 Filed 04/21/16 Page 8 of 34

  • 8/17/2019 Whirled Music Pub. v. Costello amended complaint.pdf

    9/34

     

    9

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    Agreement dated April 9, 2012 by and between Costello, Hilker, another

    third-party author and Trifecta; and (vi) Production Agreement dated October

    26, 2011 by and between Costello, Hilker, and two other third-party authors

    and Whirled. These are collectively referred to hereinafter as the

    “Production Agreements.”

    29.  The notes, memorandums, or instruments of conveyance referenced in

    subsection (c) above also include the written and signed partnership agreements between

    Costello and Hilker. Such partnership agreements transferred Costello’s musical

    compositions and related sound recordings to the partnerships that in turn transferred them

    ultimately to Whirled. Such assignments are reflected by the custom and course of dealing

     between Costello and Whirled for over a decade.

    30.  With respect the musical works that Costello and Hilker agreed to contribute

    through their partnerships for their shares, Whirled is entitled to a judicial declaration

    against Costello that it is the sole owner of all of these compositions (whether composed by

    Costello, Hilker, or both of them) and related musical sound recordings because the May

    20, 2002 shareholder minutes signed by Costello and Hilker qualify as a note,

    memorandum, or instrument of conveyance in writing and signed by them transferring the

    musical works to Whirled.

    SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF

    DECLARATORY JUDGMENT REGARDING SHARES

    31.  Whirled re-alleges and incorporates each and every allegation contained in

    the paragraphs above as if fully set forth herein.

    32. 

    In the event the Court determines that Whirled is not the sole owner of the

    musical works that Costello promised to contribute to Whirled in exchange for his shares,

    including the musical works he composed for Whirled after its formation through

    December 31, 2003, there is an actual, substantial and judiciable controversy regarding

    Case 2:15-cv-02111-GMS Document 34 Filed 04/21/16 Page 9 of 34

  • 8/17/2019 Whirled Music Pub. v. Costello amended complaint.pdf

    10/34

     

    10

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    whether Costello is a shareholder in Whirled.

    33.  If the May 20, 2002 shareholder minutes signed by Costello do not qualify as

    a note, memorandum, or instrument of conveyance of such musical works to Whirled, then

    there has been a failure of consideration and Whirled is entitled to a declaration that

    Costello does not own any shares in Whirled because he did not pay any consideration for

    the shares.

    THIRD CLAIM FOR RELIEF

    RESTITUTION

    34.  Whirled re-alleges and incorporates each and every allegation contained in

    the paragraphs above as if fully set forth herein.

    35.  With respect to the musical works that Costello composed for Whirled after

    its formation through December 31, 2003, in the event the Court determines that Costello

    was an independent contractor rather than employee, then Whirled is entitled to restitution

    of the payments it made to Costello premised on Whirled receiving the copyrights to such

    musical works in exchange for such payments.

    36.  Plaintiffs conferred a benefit on Costello by paying such wages and

    employee benefits.

    37.  Costello was unjustly enriched by receiving such wages and employee

     benefits.

    38.  Under the circumstances, in good conscience, Costello is required to make

    restitution to Whirled.

    FOURTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF

    BREACH OF CONTRACT

    39.  Whirled re-alleges and incorporates each and every allegation contained in

    the paragraphs above as if fully set forth herein.

    40.  In the event the Court determines that Whirled is not the sole owner of the

    Case 2:15-cv-02111-GMS Document 34 Filed 04/21/16 Page 10 of 34

  • 8/17/2019 Whirled Music Pub. v. Costello amended complaint.pdf

    11/34

     

    11

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    musical works that Costello promised to contribute to Whirled in exchange for his shares,

    then Costello breached his agreement reflected in the May 20, 2002 shareholder minutes to

    assign such musical works to the company.

    41. 

    With respect to the musical works that Costello composed for Whirled after

    its formation through December 31, 2003, in the event the Court determines that Whirled is

    not the sole owner of such musical works, then Costello breached his verbal employment

    agreement with Whirled that the company would receive title to such compositions in

    exchange for employing him.

    42.  In the event the Court determines that Whirled is not the sole owner of the

    musical works that are the subject of the Production Agreements, then Costello breached

    the Production Agreements by failing to deliver the copyrights to these songs.

    43.  Costello’s breaches have damaged Whirled by depriving it of ownership of

    and the ability to profit from Costello’s compositions.

    44.  This claim arises out of contract for purposes of an attorneys’ fees award

    under A.R.S. § 12-341.01

    FIFTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF

    INFRINGEMENT OF REGISTERED TRADEMARKS IN VIOLATION OF 15

    U.S.C. § 1114(1)

    45.  Whirled re-alleges and incorporates each and every allegation contained in

    the paragraphs above as if fully set forth herein.

    46.  Costello is actually aware of Whirled’s Registered Trademarks and

    Whirled’s rights in and to such Registered Trademarks, prior to adopting and using

    Whirled’s Registered Trademarks in connection with Costello’s Competing Business.

    47.  Costello purchased the URLs as listed in the table in paragraph 23 above and

    lists “WWM” as the name of organization affiliated with the name. The websites at these

    URLs redirects to Costello’s website at http://jc3publishing.com/ as indicated in the table

    Case 2:15-cv-02111-GMS Document 34 Filed 04/21/16 Page 11 of 34

  • 8/17/2019 Whirled Music Pub. v. Costello amended complaint.pdf

    12/34

     

    12

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    set forth in paragraph 23 above.

    48.  Upon information and belief, Costello chose to use Whirled’s Registered

    Trademarks in the purchased URLs to confuse and deceive customers that their goods were

    associated with, approved by, or sponsored by Whirled and a part of Whirled’s business.

    49.  The services offered by Costello’s in connection with his Competing

    Business are directly competitive with Whirled’s business provided under its Registered

    Trademarks.

    50.  Whirled currently has no association, affiliation, sponsorship, or any other

    connection to Costello, except to the extent Costello is a shareholder in Whirled and is a

    fiduciary of Whirled by virtue of being a Director of Whirled.

    51.  Upon information and belief, such deception and confusion was intentional

    and designed by Costello to trade off of and capitalize on Whirled’s goodwill and

    reputation. The aforesaid infringement by Costello was committed willfully, knowingly,

    maliciously, and in conscious disregard of Whirled’s rights.

    52.  The aforesaid infringement by Costello has caused, and unless restrained by

    this Court will continue to cause, immediate and irreparable injury to Whirled’s property

    and Business.

    53.  Costello’s use of Whirled’s Registered Trademarks is likely to cause

    confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive as to origin, sponsorship, or approval of

    Costello’s goods, services, or commercial activities, in violation of Section 32(1) of the

    Lanham Act (15 U.S.C. § 1114(1)).

    54.  Upon information and belief, Costello’s conduct constitutes willful and

    malicious infringement of Whirled’s Registered Trademarks under 15 U.S.C. § 1114, thus

    rendering the present case as an “exceptional” case as that term is employed in 15 U.S.C. §

    1117.

    55.  Whirled has no adequate remedy at law.

    Case 2:15-cv-02111-GMS Document 34 Filed 04/21/16 Page 12 of 34

  • 8/17/2019 Whirled Music Pub. v. Costello amended complaint.pdf

    13/34

     

    13

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    SIXTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF 

    TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT IN VIOLATION OF 15 U.S.C. § 1125(A) 

    56.  Whirled re-alleges and incorporates each and every allegation contained in

    the paragraphs above as if fully set forth herein.

    57. 

    Costello’s use of Whirled’s Registered Trademarks is likely to cause

    confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive as to origin, sponsorship, or approval of

    Costello’s good and services, or commercial activities, in violation of Section 43(a) of

    the Lanham Act (15 U.S.C. § 1125(a)).

    58.  The aforesaid infringement by Costello was committed willfully, knowingly,

    maliciously, and in conscious disregard of Whirled’s rights.

    59.  The aforesaid infringement by Costello has caused, and unless restrained by

    this Court will continue to cause, immediate and irreparable injury to Whirled’s property

    and business.

    60.  Whirled has no adequate remedy at law.

    SEVENTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF

    COMMON LAW INFRINGEMENT OF WHIRLED’S CUE SHEET MUSIC

    TRADEMARK AND WWM TRADEMARK

    61.  Whirled re-alleges and incorporates each and every allegation contained in

    the paragraphs above as if fully set forth herein.

    62. 

    Whirled has used its Cue Sheet Music Mark in worldwide commerce in

    connection with Whirled’s business since as early as 2007. Publisher trade names are

    exclusive and synonymous with identifying the source of a music catalogue in the music

     publishing and licensing business.

    63.  Whirled has used its WWM Trademark in worldwide commerce in

    connection with Whirled’s business since as early as 2002. Publisher trade names are

    exclusive and synonymous with identifying the source of a music catalogue in the music

    Case 2:15-cv-02111-GMS Document 34 Filed 04/21/16 Page 13 of 34

  • 8/17/2019 Whirled Music Pub. v. Costello amended complaint.pdf

    14/34

     

    14

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

     publishing and licensing business.

    64.  As indicated in the table in paragraph 23 above, immediately after being

    terminated by Whirled, Costello purchased the URLs including www.qsheetmusic.com,

    www.cuesheetmusic.com, www.cuesheetmusic.net, www.qsheetmusic.net,

    www.qsheetmusic.org, www.qsheetrecords.com, www.cuesheetrecords.com,

    www.vintagemastersjc3.com, www.whirledmusicjc3.com, www.fervorjc3.com, and

    www.whirledjohncostello.com and he listed “WWM” as the name of organization that is

    affiliated with those domain names. With the exception of www.cuesheetmusic.com and

    www.fervorjc3.com, the websites all redirected to Costello’s website at

    http://jc3publishing.com and were used by Costello in connection with his Competing

    Business.

    65.  Costello had both actual and constructive knowledge of Whirled’s

    ownership of and rights in its Cue Sheet Music Mark and WWM Trademark prior to

    Costello’s infringing use of Whirled’s Cue Sheet Music Mark and Whirled’s WWM

    Trademark.

    66.  Costello adopted and used in commerce Whirled’s Cue Sheet Music Mark

    and Whirled’s WWM Trademark in his Competing Business, with full knowledge of

    Whirled’s superior rights, and with full knowledge that his infringing use of Whirled’s Cue

    Sheet Music Mark and Whirled’s WWM Trademark was intended to cause confusion,

    mistake and/or deception. Further, Costello wrongfully listed WWM and used Whirled’s

    WWM Trademark to indicate that the URLs www.qsheetmusic.com,

    www.cuesheetmusic.com, www.cuesheetmusic.net, www.qsheetmusic.net,

    www.qsheetmusic.org, www.qsheetrecords.com, www.cuesheetrecords.com,

    www.vintagemastersjc3.com, www.whirledmusicjc3.com, www.fervorjc3.com, and

    www.whirledjohncostello.com were somehow affiliated or associated with Whirled when

    in fact they are not.

    Case 2:15-cv-02111-GMS Document 34 Filed 04/21/16 Page 14 of 34

  • 8/17/2019 Whirled Music Pub. v. Costello amended complaint.pdf

    15/34

     

    15

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    67.  Costello offers his goods and services in his Competing Business under

    Whirled’s Cue Sheet Music Mark and Whirled’s WWM Trademark in the same channels

    of trade as those in which Whirled’s legitimate goods and services are offered.

    68. 

    Costello’s infringing use of Whirled’s Cue Sheet Music Mark and Whirled’s

    WWM Trademark in connection with Costello’s Competing Business is likely to cause,

    and has caused, confusion, mistake or deception as to the affiliation, connection or

    association of Costello’s Competing Business with Whirled, in violation of applicable

    laws.

    69.  Costello’s actions were taken with the intent to trade upon the valuable

    goodwill established by Whirled in its Cue Sheet Music Mark and Whirled’s WWM

    Trademark.

    70.  As a result of Costello’s infringement, Whirled has suffered substantial

    damages, as well as the continuing loss of the goodwill and reputation established by

    Whirled in its Cue Sheet Music Mark and Whirled’s WWM Trademark. This continuing

    loss of goodwill cannot be properly calculated and thus constitutes irreparable harm and an

    injury for which Whirled has no adequate remedy at law. Whirled will continue to suffer

    irreparable harm unless this Court enjoins Costello.

    EIGHTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF

    FEDERAL UNFAIR COMPETITION AND FALSE DESIGNATION OF ORIGIN 15

    U.S.C. § 1125(A)

    71.  Whirled re-alleges and incorporates each and every allegation contained in

    the paragraphs above as if fully set forth herein.

    72. 

    Costello has deliberately and willfully attempted to trade on Whirled’s long-

    standing and hard-earned goodwill in its Whirled’s Registered Trademarks, its Cue Sheet

    Music Mark, its WWM Trademark, and the reputation established by Whirled in

    connection with its products and services, as well as in order to confuse consumers as to

    Case 2:15-cv-02111-GMS Document 34 Filed 04/21/16 Page 15 of 34

  • 8/17/2019 Whirled Music Pub. v. Costello amended complaint.pdf

    16/34

     

    16

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    the origin and sponsorship of Costello’s services in his Competing Business and to pass off

    his services in commerce as those of Whirled.

    73.  Costello’s actions were taken with the intent to trade upon the valuable

    goodwill established by Whirled in its Registered Trademarks, Cue Sheet Music Mark, and

    WWM Trademark.

    74.  In addition, Costello, without the authorization or knowledge of Whirled,

    attempted to change the records of BMI to reflect that Costello was the sole author of the

    musical compositions, rather than sharing authorship of the compositions with Hilker,

     pursuant to the pre-existing co-author agreement and their several pre-existing

     partnerships.

    75.  Based on information and belief, BMI did not allow Costello to engage in

    such conduct and refused to allow Costello to undertake such false and fraudulent claim

    and false designation of origin.

    76.  Further, in addition, Costello’s Competing Business website at

    www.jc3publishing.com, contains images of film and TV posters that imply that Costello

    and not Whirled placed and licensed the co-authored compositions and co-authored

    recordings in such films when, in fact, Costello had nothing to do with such licenses and

     placements. Such implication is made by Costello to deceive the users of film and TV

    music into thinking Costello and not Whirled was responsible for obtaining said film and

    TV music licenses and placements.

    77.  Further, Costello has used the services of artists and songwriters previously

    affiliated with Whirled in Costello’s Competing Business.

    78. 

    Costello’s unauthorized and tortious conduct has also deprived and will

    continue to deprive Whirled of the ability to control the consumer perception of its

     products and services offered under Whirled’s Registered Trademarks, Cue Sheet Music

    Mark, and WWM Trademark, placing the valuable reputation and goodwill of Whirled in

    Case 2:15-cv-02111-GMS Document 34 Filed 04/21/16 Page 16 of 34

  • 8/17/2019 Whirled Music Pub. v. Costello amended complaint.pdf

    17/34

     

    17

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    the hands of Costello.

    79.  Costello’s aforementioned conduct is likely to cause confusion, mistake or

    deception as to the affiliation, connection or association of Costello’s Competing Business

    with Whirled, and as to the origin, sponsorship or approval of Whirled, in violation of

    Section 43 of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a)(1).

    80.  As a result of Costello’s aforesaid conduct, Whirled has suffered

    commercial damage, including without limitation the continuing loss of the goodwill and

    reputation established by Whirled in its Registered Trademarks, Cue Sheet Music Mark,

    and WWM Trademark. This continuing loss cannot be properly calculated and thus

    constitutes irreparable harm and an injury for which Whirled has no adequate remedy at

    law. Whirled will continue to suffer irreparable harm unless this Court enjoins Costello’s

    conduct.

    81.  Costello’s use of Whirled’s Registered Trademarks, Cue Sheet Music Mark,

    and WWM Trademark is likely to cause confusion, mistake or deception as to source,

    origin, sponsorship or approval of Costello’s products and services, and constitutes

    infringement of Whirled’s Registered Trademarks, Cue Sheet Music Mark, and WWM

    Trademark.

    82.  By his actions, Costello has infringed the Registered Trademarks, Cue

    Sheet Music Mark, and WWM Trademark deliberately and with the intention of

    wrongfully trading on the goodwill and reputation symbolized by the Registered

    Trademarks, Cue Sheet Music Mark, and WWM Trademark.

    83.  Whirled is entitled to an award of damages from Costello for the loss of

     business and other monetary losses that Whirled has suffered and will continue to suffer in

    the future as a proximate result of Costello’s misappropriation and infringement of the

    Registered Trademarks, Cue Sheet Music Mark, and WWM Trademark. Alternatively,

    Whirled is entitled to recover damages in an amount equivalent to the amount of profits

    Case 2:15-cv-02111-GMS Document 34 Filed 04/21/16 Page 17 of 34

  • 8/17/2019 Whirled Music Pub. v. Costello amended complaint.pdf

    18/34

     

    18

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    that Costello has derived and may continue to derive as a result of his unlawful

    misappropriation and infringement of the Registered Trademarks, Cue Sheet Music Mark,

    and WWM Trademark.

    84. 

    Costello’s conduct as described above has been willful, deliberate,

    malicious, and intended to injure Whirled. Therefore, Whirled is also entitled to recover

    exemplary damages from Costello to punish and deter him and others similarly situated

    from engaging in similar wrongful conduct in the future. Costello should also be, upon

    final hearing, permanently enjoined from using the Registered Trademarks, Cue Sheet

    Music Mark, and WWM Trademark.

    NINTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF 

    UNFAIR COMPETITION UNDER A.R.S. § 44-1552 

    85.  Whirled re-alleges and incorporates each and every allegation contained in

    the paragraphs above as if fully set forth herein.

    86.  Costello’s unauthorized use of the Whirled’s Registered Trademarks, Cue

    Sheet Music Mark, WWM Trademark, and other actions as specified herein constitutes acts

    of unfair competition through Costello’s deceptive, misleading and false appropriation for

    his own use of the name, brand, trademark, reputation, and goodwill of Whirled’s

    Registered Trademarks, Cue Sheet Music Mark, and WWM Trademark in violation of

    A.R.S. § 44-1552. 

    87.  The aforesaid infringement by Costello was committed willfully,

    knowingly, maliciously, and in conscious disregard of Whirled’s rights.

    88.  The aforesaid infringement by Costello has caused, and unless restrained by

    this Court will continue to cause, immediate and irreparable injury to Whirled’s property

    and business.

    89.  Whirled has no adequate remedy at law.

    Case 2:15-cv-02111-GMS Document 34 Filed 04/21/16 Page 18 of 34

  • 8/17/2019 Whirled Music Pub. v. Costello amended complaint.pdf

    19/34

     

    19

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    Demand for Jury Trial

    90.  Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 38(a), Whirled requests a trial by jury of all issues so

    triable.

    WHEREFORE, Whirled prays for judgment against the Costellos as follows:

    A. 

    For the requested declaratory relief.

    B.  For an award of compensatory, consequential, special, and all other damages

    and restitution needed to make Whirled whole.

    C.  A preliminary and permanent injunction enjoining Costello, their offices,

    agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and those in active concert or

     participation with them who receive actual notice of the order by personal

    service or otherwise, from:

    (i)  using, reproducing, advertising, or promoting in connection with any

     product or service the Whirled’s Registered Trademarks, Cue Sheet

    Music Mark, WWM Trademark, Plaintiff’s name or mark or any name

    or mark confusingly similar therewith;

    (ii)  using, reproducing, advertising or promoting any slogan, mark, or

    name that may be calculated to represent or that has the effect of

    representing that the products or services of Costello or any other

     person are sponsored by, authorized by, or in some way associated

    with Whirled;

    (iii)  injuring the commercial reputation, renown, and goodwill of Whirled

    or the Whirled’s Registered Trademarks, Cue Sheet Music Mark, or

    WWM Trademark;

    (iv)  using or reproducing any word, term, name, symbol, or device, or any

    combination thereof, on any product or in connection with any service

    that confuses or falsely represents or misleads, is calculated to

    Case 2:15-cv-02111-GMS Document 34 Filed 04/21/16 Page 19 of 34

  • 8/17/2019 Whirled Music Pub. v. Costello amended complaint.pdf

    20/34

     

    20

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    confuse, falsely represent, or mislead, or that has the effect of

    confusing, falsely representing, or misleading, that the products,

    services, or activities of Costello or another are in some way

    connected with Whirled, or is sponsored, approved, or licensed by

    Whirled; and

    (v)  causing a likelihood of confusion with respect to Whirled or any

    injury to the business reputation of Whirled.

    D.  An award of damages to Whirled under the Lanham Act, and in particular

     pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1117(a), of up to three times the damages suffered by

    Whirled and three times the profits earned by Costello.

    E.  Directing Costello to transfer to Whirled (at no cost to Whirled) all domain

    names that contain or consist of Whirled’s marks, including but not limited to

    the URL’s listed in paragraph 23.

    F.  Ordering Costello to preserve through trial and then deliver up for

    destruction, pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1118, all Internet webpages/scripts/ html

    code, articles, packages, wrappers, products, displays, labels, signs, circulars,

    kits, packaging, letterhead, business cards, promotional items, literature, sales

    aids, or other matter in the possession, custody, or under the control of

    Costello or his agents bearing the Whirled’s Registered Trademarks, Cue

    Sheet Music Mark, or WWM Trademark, in any manner, or any mark that is

    confusingly similar to or a colorable imitation of these marks.

    G.  Ordering Costello to take all steps necessary to cancel any state or local

     business registrations, including corporate name registrations and dba filings,

    that include Whirled’s name or marks or amend those registrations to names

    that do not include Whirled’s name or marks, and to remove any references

    Case 2:15-cv-02111-GMS Document 34 Filed 04/21/16 Page 20 of 34

  • 8/17/2019 Whirled Music Pub. v. Costello amended complaint.pdf

    21/34

     

    21

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    to any business registrations, including corporate names and dba filings, that

    include Whirled’s name or marks.

    H.  Ordering Costello to retain and disclose all communications with all

    individuals and entities with whom they engaged in any transaction relating

    to or arising from the use of the Whirled’s Registered Trademarks, Cue Sheet

    Music Mark, or WWM Trademark, names or marks, or otherwise in

    furtherance of the scheme alleged herein.

    I.  Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1117(a), of up to three times the damages suffered by

    Whirled and three times the profits earned by any and all of the Costello.

    J. 

    The (a) forfeiture of Defendant Costello’s stock and tender back to Whirled,

    (b) disgorgement by Costello of all shareholder distributions and other

    shareholder benefits received by Defendant Costello since 2002, and/or (c)

     payment by Costello to Whirled of an amount equal to 26.323% of the value

    of Whirled to support consideration; and/or (d) ordering Costello to execute

    all necessary documentation to transfer the musical works to Whirled as

    consideration for his stock in Whirled.

    K.  For an award of treble, exemplary, and/or punitive damages.

    L.  For an award of attorneys’ fees and costs.

    M.  For an award of pre-judgment and post-judgment interest.

     N.  For such other and further relief as may be needed to provide Whirled with a

    complete remedy.

    . . .

    . . .

    . . .

    . . .

    Case 2:15-cv-02111-GMS Document 34 Filed 04/21/16 Page 21 of 34

  • 8/17/2019 Whirled Music Pub. v. Costello amended complaint.pdf

    22/34

     

    22

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    DATED this 21st day of April, 2015.

    TIFFANY & BOSCO P.A.

    By: /s/ Christopher A. LaVoy

    Christopher A. LaVoySeventh Floor Camelback Esplanade II2525 East Camelback RoadPhoenix, Arizona 85016-4237

    Connie J. MablesonCONNIE J. MABLESON, PLLC1938 East Osborn RoadPhoenix, Arizona 85016

     Attorneys for Plaintiff

    Case 2:15-cv-02111-GMS Document 34 Filed 04/21/16 Page 22 of 34

  • 8/17/2019 Whirled Music Pub. v. Costello amended complaint.pdf

    23/34

     

    23

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

    I hereby certify that on April 21, 2016, I electronically transmitted the attached

    document to the Clerk’s Office using the CM/ECF System for filing and transmittal of a

     Notice of Electronic Filing to all CM/ECF registrants for this case.

    By: s/Christopher A. LaVoy

    Case 2:15-cv-02111-GMS Document 34 Filed 04/21/16 Page 23 of 34

  • 8/17/2019 Whirled Music Pub. v. Costello amended complaint.pdf

    24/34

     

    Exhibit 1

    Case 2:15-cv-02111-GMS Document 34 Filed 04/21/16 Page 24 of 34

  • 8/17/2019 Whirled Music Pub. v. Costello amended complaint.pdf

    25/34

    WAIVEROFNOTICD

    The

    undersigned,

    constituting

    all of

    tle

    Directors

    of

    the Board

    for WHIRLEI)

    MUSIC-PIIBLISHING,

    INC.,

    an Arizona

    corporation,

    do hereby

    waive

    call

    and

    notice

    of call of

    tlre

    time,

    place,

    and purpose

    of

    the

    SpEcial

    Meeting

    of

    tlie

    Board

    of

    Directors

    of

    slid

    corporation,_and

    do hereby

    consent

    that stid

    meeting be held

    on

    E?-td-

    at

    the Corporate

    offrce.

    This

    meetiqg

    will

    be for. the

    purpose

    oftransacting

    such

    business as

    may

    be

    properly

    brought before the meeting.

    Ü

    Case 2:15-cv-02111-GMS Document 34 Filed 04/21/16 Page 25 of 34

  • 8/17/2019 Whirled Music Pub. v. Costello amended complaint.pdf

    26/34

    WAIVER

    OF

    NOTICE

    We,

    the

    undersigned shareholders,

    constituting all

    ofthe

    shareholders

    of

    WHIRLED MUSIC

    PUBLISIIING, INC., an

    Arizona

    corporation,

    do

    hereby

    waive

    call

    and

    notice of call of

    the

    time,

    place,

    and

    purpose

    of the

    Initial

    Meeting of the

    Shareholders ofsaid corporation,

    and do hereby consent that said meeting be held

    on the

    following date at the corporate

    office for

    the

    purposes

    of

    transacting such business as may

    be

    properly

    brought before

    the

    meeting.

    In addition, the undersigned shareholders agree

    on

    a

    Board of Directors

    consisting

    of the following individuals; Jeffrey Freundlich,

    David Hilker, and John Costello

    III

    each

    to

    hold office

    until his/her successor shall

    have

    been

    duly

    elected

    and

    qualified.

    DAVID THO‡Wá¼S DIETCHE

    ELAN FREYDINSON

    GARY RO‡WERO

    JOSHU FIORITO SHIMKIN

    RACHEL WENSTEIN

    Ü

    Case 2:15-cv-02111-GMS Document 34 Filed 04/21/16 Page 26 of 34

  • 8/17/2019 Whirled Music Pub. v. Costello amended complaint.pdf

    27/34

    MINUTES OF'TIIE

    FIRST

    MEETING

    OF

    THE BOARD

    OF

    DIRECTORS OF

    WHIRLED

    MUSIC

    PUBLISHING,

    INC.

    The first

    meeting

    of

    the Board of

    Directors

    of WIIIRLED

    MUSIC

    PUBLISHING,

    INC.,

    an Arizona

    corporation,

    was held

    at the offrces

    of Sigrist

    &

    Cheek,

    PC, 5777 South

    Rural

    Road,

    Tempe,

    AZ 85283.

    All of

    the

    Directors

    named

    in

    the

    Articles of

    Incorporation

    waived call

    and notice

    of

    call of

    the

    meeting

    in writing,

    a

    copy

    of

    which is

    filed with

    these

    Minutes, and

    the

    following

    Directors

    were

    present, to

    wit.

    JEFFREY

    FREUNDLICH

    DAVID HILKER

    JOHN

    COSTELLO

    III

    DAVID

    HILKER

    acted

    as

    Chairman

    of

    the

    meeting,

    and

    JOHN

    COSTELLO

    III recorded

    the

    Minutes'

    The

    chairman

    stated

    that

    the

    Articles of Incorporation

    had been

    filed

    with

    the

    Arizona

    Corporation

    Commission,

    would

    be

    duly

    and

    properly

    published

    in accordance

    with

    A.R.S.3ection

    10-055,

    and

    that

    the

    corporation

    was

    now

    qualified to transact

    business.

    Themeetingthenproceededtotheelectionofoffrcersandthefollowingofficers

    were

    unanimously

    elected:

    DAVID

    HILKER

    PTCSidCNt

    JEFFREY

    FREUNDLICH

    Chief

    Operating

    Officer

    JOHN

    COSTELLO

    III

    SecretarY

    each

    to

    hold

    office

    until

    his/her

    successor

    shall

    have

    been

    duly

    elected

    and

    qualified'

    Case 2:15-cv-02111-GMS Document 34 Filed 04/21/16 Page 27 of 34

  • 8/17/2019 Whirled Music Pub. v. Costello amended complaint.pdf

    28/34

    The

    Chairman

    presented

    to

    the

    meeting

    a

    proposed

    form

    of

    Bylaws

    and,

    on

    motion duly made and

    seconded,

    the following resolution

    was

    unanimously

    adopted:

    RESOLVED,

    that the

    form

    of

    Bylaws

    which has been

    submitted

    to the meeting

    be, and

    it hereby

    is,

    approved

    and adopted as the Bylaws

    ofthe corporation,

    and

    that

    the

    Secretary be and hereby

    is

    instructed

    to

    insert the

    same

    in the corporate minute book.

    The Chairman then

    presented

    a

    proposed

    form

    of certificate for the

    shares

    of

    stock

    of the corporation.

    On

    motion

    duly made and seconded,

    the

    following

    resolution

    was

    unanimously

    adopted:

    RESOLVED,

    that the

    form of

    certificate

    representing

    shares ofthe

    capital stock

    of

    the

    corporation

    which has

    been submitted to this meeting

    be, and the

    same

    is in

    all

    respects, approved and adopted as the form of certificate

    to

    represent

    the capital

    stock of

    this corporation.

    The matter

    of

    a

    depository

    and

    corporate

    accounts was

    considered

    and

    thereupon,

    on

    motion

    duly made and seconded, the

    following

    resolutions were

    unanimously

    adopted:

    RESOL

    be opened at

    Arizona, and

    that

    the checks ofthe

    corporation on

    said

    account be signed by the following individuals:

    V”`

    'ƒI

    %T‚Â

    • Jtte bmk accou•¡

    ‚ ¨

     md h icnmeof•¡

    e co‚ÁOr•g

    On

    ,1•¡

    ‹ r

    ž ²

    û

    ƒI • ñ

    ‘ Ê

    RESOLVED

    FURTHER, that the resolution

    or resolutions required

    by said Bank

    for

    opening

    ofsaid

    bank account

    and

    the signing

    ofsaid

    checks

    hereinbeforc

    set forth be,

    and the

    same

    hereby is,

    considered

    as

    passed

    at

    this meeting,

    and that a copy ofsaid

    resolution in

    the usual card

    form

    used by said Bank

    be attached to these Minutes.

    RESOLVED FURTHER,

    that the Secretary is hereby

    authorized to certi$,

    to the

    passage

    ofsaid resolution

    as

    required

    by

    said

    Bank

    at the

    meeting

    ofthe

    Board

    of

    Directors

    as of

    this

    date.

    The Chairman

    stated

    that the

    corporation

    had

    not

    authorized the

    issuance

    ofany

    stock. He

    further stated

    that it

    was

    deemed

    advisable

    that any stock issued should

    be

    issued

    so

    as

    to qualifu

    as

    "Section

    1244

    Stock"

    pursuant

    to

    the

    Intemal

    Revenue Code

    of

    1986,

    Section

    1244.

    Thereupon,

    the

    plan

    to

    authorize 100,000

    qualiSing

    Section

    1244

    shares of

    common stock contained

    in

    Exhibit A was

    duly

    proposed

    and

    unanimously

    adopted.

    Case 2:15-cv-02111-GMS Document 34 Filed 04/21/16 Page 28 of 34

  • 8/17/2019 Whirled Music Pub. v. Costello amended complaint.pdf

    29/34

    The

    Chairman

    then

    stated

    that the

    following individuals

    had

    offered

    to

    purchase

    the following number

    of

    shares

    of this corporation's

    common stock

    at

    no-par value

    per

    share:

    TOTAL ISSUED

    2,500 0 SIIARES

    2,500 0 SHARES

    2,500,O SIL•R RES

    189 0 SHARES

    940 0 SIL•R

    RES

    377 5 SHARES

    125 0 SIL•R RES

    377 5 SHARES

    491 0 SHARES

    10,000 SIIARES

    for the

    consideration

    set forth

    in Exhibit

    B attached

    hereto.

    The Chairman

    pointed out that shares

    issued by the corporation

    upon

    its

    acceptance

    ofsuch

    offer

    would

    not be registered

    and

    could

    be

    issued and

    sold only

    in

    reliance

    upon

    an

    exemption

    from

    the registration

    requirements

    of the Securities

    Act

    of

    1933

    and

    the Arizona

    Securities

    Act.

    The

    issuees staled

    that

    they

    were

    purchasing the

    stock

    for

    investment

    puq)oses only,

    that they

    understood

    the

    risks attendant

    to such

    a

    purchase, and

    that they

    had complete

    knowledge

    ofthe

    financial

    condition

    ofthe

    tusiness.

    They stated

    that

    they were

    bona

    fide

    residents

    of the State

    of Arizona,

    and that

    the company's

    business

    would be

    conducted

    solely

    in Arizona.

    Thereupon,

    the following

    resolutions

    were duly

    proposed

    and unanimously

    adopted:

    WHEREAS,

    it

    is

    deemed

    advisable

    by the

    Board

    of

    Directors

    that

    this

    corporation

    offer

    for

    sale,

    and issue

    shares

    of

    common

    stock

    authoizedby

    its Articles

    of

    Incorporation;

    and

    WHEREAS,itisfurtherdeemedadvisablebytheBoardofDirectorsthatthe

    offer,

    sale,

    and

    issuance

    of such

    shares

    be

    effectuated

    in such

    a manner

    that

    qualified

    stockholders

    may

    receive

    the benefits

    of

    the

    Intemal

    Revenue

    code of

    1954,

    Section

    1244;

    and

    WHEREAS,theproposedissueeshaveofferedtosubscribeforandpurchasea

    total

    of10,000

    shares

    of

    the

    common

    capital

    stock

    ofthe

    corporation

    for the

    consideration

    as

    shown

    in Exhibit

    B attached

    hereto;

    and

    WHEREAS,

    it is in

    the best

    interests

    of

    the corporation

    that

    such

    subscription

    for

    its common

    capital

    stock

    should

    be

    accepted;

    DAVID HILKER

    JEFFREY FREUNDLICH

    JOIIN COSTELLO Hl

    DANIEL GABAY

    DAVID THONIAS DIETCHE

    ELAN FREYDENSON

    GARY ROMERO

    JOSHU FIORITO SHIMKIN

    RACHEL WEINSTEIN

    Case 2:15-cv-02111-GMS Document 34 Filed 04/21/16 Page 29 of 34

  • 8/17/2019 Whirled Music Pub. v. Costello amended complaint.pdf

    30/34

    NOW, THEREFORE,

    BE

    IT RESOLVED,

    that

    the aforesaid subscription

    for

    10,000

    shares

    of common

    capital stock

    of

    this corporation

    shall be and

    it hereby, is

    accepted;

    and

    that

    upon receipt

    of

    payment therefor, the

    officers

    shall

    be and

    they hereby

    are

    authorized

    and

    directed to

    issue

    certificates

    for such

    shares

    as being

    fully

    paid

    and

    nonassessable;

    and

    BE

    IT FURTHER

    RESOLVED,

    that

    the certificate

    or

    certificates

    for such

    shares

    so

    subscribed

    and

    purchased shall

    conspicuously

    bear

    a

    such

    legends

    required

    by

    the

    Bylaws;

    and

    BE

    IT

    FURTHER

    RESOLVED,

    that

    the

    Treasurer

    enter a certificate

    of receipt in

    the corporate

    minute

    book

    evidencing

    delivery

    of the

    consideration

    received

    and such

    other

    documents

    as

    may

    be

    necessary.

    The

    next matter

    brought

    to

    the Board

    for discussion

    by the Chairman

    was the

    selection

    of

    a fiscal

    year

    for

    the

    corporation.

    The

    chairman

    suggested

    that

    a

    fiscal

    year

    terminating

    on

    DECEMBER

    31 be

    adopted.

    After

    a

    full

    discussion

    and

    upon

    motion

    duly

    made

    and seconded,

    a

    resolution

    was unanimously

    passed adopted

    DECEMBER

    31

    as

    ihe

    fiscal

    year

    end

    for

    the

    corporation,

    and

    the

    Secretary

    was instructed

    to

    notiry such

    agencies

    as

    necessary

    ofselection

    of

    the

    same.

    The

    chairman

    then

    announced

    that,

    in accordance

    with the

    Business

    corporation

    Act

    ofthe

    state ofArizona,

    it

    would

    be

    necessaly

    to

    determine

    the amount

    of

    money

    which

    should

    be

    allocated

    to

    stated

    capital

    ofthe

    corporation.

    The

    chairman

    stated that

    he

    had been

    in

    contact

    with

    the

    corporation's

    accountant,

    who

    gave

    an

    explanation

    of

    stated

    capital.

    Following

    such

    explanation,

    upon

    motion

    duly

    made, seconded,

    and

    unanimously carried,

    it

    was:

    RESOLVED,

    that the

    entire

    dollar

    amount

    of

    the

    issued and

    outstanding

    common

    stock

    ofthe

    corporation

    be

    allocated

    to stated

    capital.

    The

    next discussion

    entered

    into by the

    Board

    involved

    the

    Medical

    Reimbursement

    Plan

    contained

    in

    Exhibit

    c.

    wherefore,

    the

    Board decided

    that

    a

    reimbursement

    plan

    would

    be

    desirable

    to the

    Corporation.

    Thereupon,

    the

    following

    resolution

    was duly

    proposed and

    unanimously

    adopted:

    The

    Board

    then

    considered

    a

    general

    resolution

    authorizing

    the

    President

    and

    Secretary to execute

    contracts, escrow

    agreements, deeds,

    deeds

    oftrust,

    mortgages,

    trust

    ug.""-"ntr,

    and

    other

    forms

    of instruments

    and

    documents

    for and

    on behalfofthe

    cirporation

    in

    order

    to

    carry

    out

    the business

    and

    business

    purposes

    ofthe

    corporation.

    upon

    motion

    duly

    made

    and

    seconded,

    the

    following

    resolutions

    were

    unanimously

    adopted:

    RESOLVED,

    that

    the

    duly

    elected

    President

    and Secretary

    of this

    corporation,

    including

    both

    those

    presently

    holding office

    and

    those

    elected

    in

    the future,

    are

    Case 2:15-cv-02111-GMS Document 34 Filed 04/21/16 Page 30 of 34

  • 8/17/2019 Whirled Music Pub. v. Costello amended complaint.pdf

    31/34

    authorized and empowered in

    the

    name

    of and on behalfofthis corporation to

    enter into

    all contracts

    and

    commitments

    and to do

    any

    and all acts necessary for

    the

    accomplishment

    of the

    puposes

    of this

    corporation,

    including

    the borrowing of

    money

    in

    any :unount, with or without secudty therefor, and to execute any and all documents

    deemed by

    them necessary for the

    conduct

    ofsuch business,

    including by way of

    illustration, but

    not

    limited

    to,

    notes,

    deeds,

    mortgages,

    deeds

    of

    trust,

    bills ofsale,

    conditional

    sales

    contracts, security agreements, financing statements,

    purchase

    agreements, assignments,

    leases,

    and,

    in

    general,

    all instruments

    or

    documents whether

    similar

    or

    dissimilar

    to

    those

    named

    by

    way

    if

    illustration, except that the Secretary

    shall

    not execute any such

    instrument or documents except in attestation ofthe authority ofthe

    President to execute

    the

    said

    instrument, to

    purchase

    office

    supplies,

    fumiture, and

    equipment necessary to operate

    and

    maintain

    the business ofthe corporation, to

    procure

    all

    forms of insurance as

    may

    become necessary

    for

    the

    protection

    of

    the corporation

    and

    the conduct

    of

    its business, to

    procure

    all licenses that

    may be needed for the conduct

    of

    the corporations business

    and to engage

    the

    services ofall

    attomeys and accountants,

    and

    generally

    to

    conduct the

    business

    ofthe corporation as the

    General

    Manager thereof.

    BE

    IT

    FURTHER RESOLVED,

    that

    if

    a

    party

    involved in such transaction

    requests or

    requires a resolution ofthe Board

    of Directors specifically authorizing

    all

    or

    any

    portion

    ofsuch

    transaction

    or a resolution a

    particular form,

    the

    President

    and/or

    Secretary

    may certiry

    such resolution as having

    been

    authorized

    and deemed adopted at

    this meeting,

    whereupon

    a

    copy

    ofsuch

    certification

    shall

    be inserted in the corporation

    minute

    book; and

    BE

    IT

    FURTHER

    RESOLVED, that the officers of

    the

    corporation

    be, and

    they

    hereby are further authorized

    and

    empowered

    to do

    any

    and

    all other

    and

    further

    things

    and

    matters, ofevery

    nature whatsoever, which such officers,

    in their

    sole

    and

    unlimited

    discretion

    shall

    deem

    necessary or

    proper

    for

    the purpose

    of

    effectuating

    and

    carrying out

    the intent and

    purposes

    ofthe resolution heretofore

    adopted at this

    meeting,

    looking

    toward

    the

    completion

    of all acts and matters

    in connection with the full organization

    and

    operations

    of the

    corporation, and

    BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED,

    that

    all acts and things

    heretofore done for

    and on

    behalf and

    in

    the name

    ofthe corporation by the

    incorporator,

    JEFFREY

    FREUNDLICH be,

    and the same hereby are,

    ratified, and affirmed

    in

    each,

    all, and

    every

    respect.

    There behg no furtherbISttSS„_

    '?mcbtt„K

    Ë

    motion,

    duly made and

    seconded,

    adjoumed.

    Secretary

    Case 2:15-cv-02111-GMS Document 34 Filed 04/21/16 Page 31 of 34

  • 8/17/2019 Whirled Music Pub. v. Costello amended complaint.pdf

    32/34

    FORSALE

    OF

    WHIRLED

    MUSIC

    PUBLISHING,

    INC.

    WHEREAS,

    The Board of

    Directors deem

    it

    advisable

    and in the best

    interest of

    the Corporation

    to offer for

    sale and issue

    shares of

    common stock

    in the total amount of

    not

    more than

    100,000

    in the

    manner such

    that in the

    hand

    of

    qualified

    stockholders such

    shares

    of stock

    will

    receive

    the benefits of

    Section

    1244

    of

    the Intemal

    Revenue Code of

    1954,

    as

    amended;

    and

    Whereas,

    the

    corporation

    is

    a

    "small

    business

    corporation"

    as

    defined

    in Section

    1244

    (3)

    2, in

    that:

    the

    sum

    of the

    aggregate

    amount

    of

    money

    and

    other

    property received

    by

    the

    corporation

    for stock,

    as

    a contribution

    to

    capital,

    and as

    paid-in

    surplus,

    does

    not

    exceed

    1,000,000.00;

    and

    whereas,

    there

    is not

    now

    outstanding

    any

    prior offering

    ofthe

    corporation to

    sell

    or

    issue

    any of

    its stock,

    Now

    therefore,

    it is

    hereby

    resolved that

    the

    proper

    officers

    ofthe

    corporation

    are

    hereby

    authorized

    and

    directed

    to offer,

    payable in

    cash

    or other

    property

    (other

    than

    stock

    or

    securities)

    as from

    time

    to time they

    deem

    to

    be

    in

    the

    best

    interests ofthe

    Corporation,

    subject

    to the

    following:

    1.

    The

    plan as herein

    set

    forth

    upon

    its

    adoption

    by the

    Board

    of

    Directors

    of

    the

    Corporation

    shall

    become

    effective.

    2.

    The

    corporation

    is

    authorized

    to offer

    and

    issue

    100,000

    shares

    of

    common

    stock

    ofno

    par value.

    Case 2:15-cv-02111-GMS Document 34 Filed 04/21/16 Page 32 of 34

  • 8/17/2019 Whirled Music Pub. v. Costello amended complaint.pdf

    33/34

    3.

    The

    corporation shall

    offer and

    issue

    such shares of

    common stock

    from

    the

    date

    hereof until sold,

    or

    to

    the date when the corporation

    shall make a subsequent

    offering of any stock, whichever

    shall

    occur

    sooner.

    4.

    During such

    period

    as set

    forth in

    paragraph

    3, the corporation

    shall

    offer

    and issue

    only

    such

    common stock.

    5.

    The maximum amount

    to be

    received

    by

    the

    corporation in consideration

    of the

    stock

    to be issued

    pursuant

    to

    this

    plan

    shall

    be

    no more than

    $1,000,000.

    6.

    Such

    common stock

    shall

    be

    issued

    only for

    money

    and other

    property

    (other

    than

    stock or securities).

    7.

    Such

    other action

    shall be taken by the

    corporations as

    such

    quali$

    the

    stock offered

    and issued under this plan

    as

    "Section

    1244

    Stock",

    and as such

    term

    is

    defined in

    the Intemal Revenue

    Code

    and the

    Regulations

    issued

    thereunder.

    This

    plan

    shall be interpreted

    and construed

    in

    such a maru{er

    as

    will

    enable

    it

    to

    qualifu

    as a

    plan

    meeting

    the

    requirements

    of Section

    1244 of thc Intemal

    Revenue

    Code

    of 1954,

    as amended, and as

    will

    enable

    the

    share of

    cgtpofl slock

    ilsued thereunder

    to

    DAVID

    Approved

    and adopted

    by the Board

    of Directors

    on the

    quatify

    as a

    plan

    meeting

    the

    requirements

    ofSection

    1244 of thc

    Ir

    of 1954,

    as amended, and as wr.l.l

    enable

    the

    share

    of

    crymor{ slock

    qualifu

    as

    "Section

    1244

    Stock", as

    define;\n said

    S{tibn.

    ,

    ,

    '"",

    , i-l

    day

    20

    f

    Case 2:15-cv-02111-GMS Document 34 Filed 04/21/16 Page 33 of 34

  • 8/17/2019 Whirled Music Pub. v. Costello amended complaint.pdf

    34/34

    Case 2:15-cv-02111-GMS Document 34 Filed 04/21/16 Page 34 of 34


Recommended