Date post: | 06-Jul-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | mark-h-jaffe |
View: | 221 times |
Download: | 0 times |
of 34
8/17/2019 Whirled Music Pub. v. Costello amended complaint.pdf
1/34
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Christopher A. LaVoy (SB# 016609)Tiffany & Bosco, P.A.Seventh Floor Camelback Esplanade II2525 East Camelback RoadPhoenix, Arizona 85016-9240
Telephone: (602) 255-6000Facsimile: (602) 255-0103E-Mail: [email protected]
Connie J. Mableson (SB# 010665)Connie J. Mableson, PLLC1938 East Osborn RoadPhoenix, Arizona 85016Telephone: 602-277-8100E-Mail: [email protected]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Whirled Music Publishing, Inc., an Arizonacorporation,
Plaintiff,
v.
John A. Costello, III and Jennifer Costello,husband and wife,
Defendants.
Case No. 2:15-cv-02111-GMS
FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
For its Complaint, plaintiff Whirled Music Publishing, Inc. (“Whirled”) alleges as
follows:
Overview of Action
1. Whirled brings this action for a declaratory judgment confirming its
ownership of the copyrights to certain music that former employee John A. Costello
Case 2:15-cv-02111-GMS Document 34 Filed 04/21/16 Page 1 of 34
8/17/2019 Whirled Music Pub. v. Costello amended complaint.pdf
2/34
2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
composed for Whirled and/or contributed to Whirled in exchange for shares in the
corporation. Whirled also sues Costello for trademark infringement.
The Parties
2.
Plaintiff Whirled is an Arizona corporation with its principal place of
business in Maricopa County, Arizona.
3. Defendants John and Jennifer Costello, husband and wife, reside in Maricopa
County, Arizona. The Costellos were acting for the benefit of their marital community at
all times relevant hereto.
Jurisdiction and Venue
4.
This Court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and
1338, and pursuant to the doctrine of supplemental jurisdiction.
5. Venue is proper in this district under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391 and 1400(a).
Facts Common to All Counts
The Formation of Whirled
6. In 2002, a small group of talented and respected musicians established
Whirled primarily to place music in television shows, televised sporting events, and films.
The company has grown to accumulate and own a large catalogue of music spanning over
nine decades that is marketed under several genre-specific brands, including Wild Whirled
Music, Whirled Music, Trailerville Music, Muzik Headz, Fervor Records, Vintage
Masters, Fervor Records Vintage Masters, and Cue Sheet Music. The company represents
hundreds of songwriters and composers worldwide.
7. Whirled licenses its music in its catalogue for a fee and the right to receive
“performance royalties.” A “performance royalty” is paid every time a song is played.
Publishers and songwriters register with a performance rights organizations (“PROs”) such
as Broadcast Music, Inc. (“BMI”) to collect performance royalties on their behalf. PROs
like BMI pay the music publishing company and songwriters based on the actual use of the
Case 2:15-cv-02111-GMS Document 34 Filed 04/21/16 Page 2 of 34
8/17/2019 Whirled Music Pub. v. Costello amended complaint.pdf
3/34
3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
compositions. Once a composition is registered with the PRO, no changes can be made to
that registration without the consent of the music publishing company and all of the
songwriters.
8.
Whirled’s shareholders include John Costello and David Hilker, each holding
26.323% of the company’s shares and both sitting on its board. Hilker is also the
company’s CEO and President. Costello was formerly its Secretary.
9. Hilker and Costello are longtime musical collaborators and business partners.
They received their respective shares in Whirled in exchange for contributing the
copyrights and publishing interests to certain musical compositions and related sound
recordings they jointly held through a pre-existing co-author agreement and several pre-
existing partnership(s). Such contribution is described in the May 20, 2002 minutes of
Whirled’s first board meeting (see Exhibit 1).
10. Whirled’s catalogue generally consists of musical compositions and sound
recordings contributed at Whirled’s formation by Hilker and Costello through their several
pre-existing partnerships; music composed and sound recordings produced by staff
songwriters, including until recently Costello; and music acquired by copyright assignment
from third-parties, often through catalogue acquisitions.
Costello’s Employment as a Staff Songwriter
11. Costello was among the musicians who started Whirled and a full-time staff
songwriter at the company until his employment was terminated on December 31, 2014.
12. Whirled paid Costello an annual salary ($64,500 in 2014) plus granted him a
“writer’s share” of performance royalties. With respect to the “writer’s share,” Costello and
Hilker requested that it be split equally between them for the compositions that each solely
wrote for Whirled by listing them both as co-writers on such compositions, just as they
shared attribution and royalties through their pre-existing co-author agreement and their
several pre-existing partnerships, which Whirled did.
Case 2:15-cv-02111-GMS Document 34 Filed 04/21/16 Page 3 of 34
8/17/2019 Whirled Music Pub. v. Costello amended complaint.pdf
4/34
4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
13. Costello and Hilker have shared attribution and royalties in this manner for
nearly thirty years, through their partnership agreements. Whirled listed Costello and
Hilker as co-writers with BMI on all songs they wrote together or separately pursuant to
their request and pursuant to their pre-existing co-author agreement and their several pre-
existing partnerships.
14. Whirled’s payroll and tax records, as well as Costello’s own tax records,
reflect his status as an employee. Whirled paid the employer’s share of FICA withholdings
for Costello. Whirled also provided Costello valuable employee benefits, including a cell
phone, musical equipment stipend, vacation pay, a health insurance stipend, and
contributing to his retirement plan.
15. Consistent with the employment relationship, Whirled directed and
supervised significant aspects of Costello’s work, including specifying musical genres,
song duration, rhythms, beats, tempos, arrangements, song formats, and other aspects of
the songwriting process.
Costello’s Assertion of Copyright Ownership
16. For a variety of reasons including significant changes in the music publishing
industry, Whirled made the difficult decision in late 2015 to eliminate Costello’s
songwriter position at the company. This did not affect his roles as a shareholder and
director. The company no longer employs any staff songwriters.
17. After Whirled terminated Costello’s employment on December 31, 2014,
Costello asserted, for the first time, that he was an independent contractor rather than an
employee. He did this as part of claiming the copyrights to the musical works he composed
and recorded for Whirled.
18. Costello refused multiple requests by Whirled to acknowledge and
memorialize, in an industry-standard acceptable form and content, the company’s
ownership of these copyrights.
Case 2:15-cv-02111-GMS Document 34 Filed 04/21/16 Page 4 of 34
8/17/2019 Whirled Music Pub. v. Costello amended complaint.pdf
5/34
5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
19. With respect to the compositions and sound recordings Costello and Hilker
contributed for their shares in Whirled through their several pre-existing partnerships,
Costello has further declined to sign an industry-standard form of written copyright
assignment vesting copyright ownership for such compositions and sound recordings in
Whirled, thereby placing a cloud on Whirled’s rights in those compositions and sound
recordings as well.
Costello’s Misappropriation of Whirled’s Trademarks
20. Whirled owns certain federally registered trademarks and service marks that
are nationally and internationally recognized in connection with its business, as follows
(the “Registered Trademarks”):
MARK Reg. No. Registered First Used Goods & Services
VINTAGEMASTERS®
4,322,455 April 16,2013
July 1, 2007 Music Licensing inFilm, TV, andInternet
VINTAGEMASTERS®
4,322,454 April 16,2013
July 1, 2007 Musical SoundRecordings
ONE STOP SHOPVINTAGE MASTERS-
FERVOR RECORDS®
3,847,410 September14, 2010
December 2,2009
Music Licensing inFilm, TV, and
InternetFERVOR RECORDS™ Serial No.
86676611Application pending withUSPTO
January 5,1990
Musical SoundRecordings
FERVOR RECORDS™ Serial No.86666822
Application pending withUSPTO
January 5,1990
Music Licensing inFilm, TV, andInternet
21. Whirled also owns certain common law trademarks that have been used
throughout the world, including:
a.
The service mark, WILD WHIRLED MUSIC™ and WHIRLED MUSIC™
(collectively, the “WWM Trademark”). Whirled does business under the
WWM Trademark worldwide and has done so continuously since as early as
2002.
Case 2:15-cv-02111-GMS Document 34 Filed 04/21/16 Page 5 of 34
8/17/2019 Whirled Music Pub. v. Costello amended complaint.pdf
6/34
6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
b. The service mark, CUE SHEET MUSIC™ (the “Cue Sheet Music Mark”).
Whirled, through Trifecta, does business under the Cue Sheet Music Mark
worldwide and has done so continuously since as early as 2007.
22.
Shortly after Whirled terminated Costello’s employment, and as part of
setting up his own competing music publishing business (the “Competing Business”),
Costello purchased the URL www.jc3publishing.com and other domain name URLs
(uniform resource locators) from the ICANN Register, GoDaddy.com as indicated in the
following table. In all registrations (including Costello’s main webpage for his Competing
Business, www.jc3publishing.com), Costello listed “WWM” as the name of the
“organization” affiliated with the URL. Costello improperly used Whirled’s WWM
Trademark in his registration to make it appear that Whirled (the “organization”) is
somehow affiliated or associated with the URL www.jc3publishing.com, which it is not.
The websites, at almost all of the purchased URLs/domains (as indicated in the following
table), redirect to Costello’s website at http://jc3publishing.com.
Date
Registered
URL Registered by Costello WWM listed
as affiliated
entity?
Redirected to:
1/26/15 www.whirledmusicjc3.com Yes http://jc3publishing.com/
1/26/15 www.jc3publishing.com Yes http://jc3publishing.com/
1/26/15 www.fervorjc3.com Yes
1/26/15 www.vintagemastersjc3.com Yes http://jc3publishing.com/
1/26/15 www.cuesheetmusic.net Yes http://jc3publishing.com/
1/26/15 www.qsheetrecords.com Yes http://jc3publishing.com/1/26/15 www.cuesheetrecords.com Yes http://jc3publishing.com/
1/26/15 www.qsheetmusic.org Yes http://jc3publishing.com/
1/26/15 www.whirledjohncostello.com Yes http://jc3publishing.com/
Case 2:15-cv-02111-GMS Document 34 Filed 04/21/16 Page 6 of 34
8/17/2019 Whirled Music Pub. v. Costello amended complaint.pdf
7/34
7
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
1/26/15 www.qsheetmusic.net Yes http://jc3publishing.com/
1/26/15 www.cuesheetmusic.com Yes
1/26/15 www.qsheetmusic.com Yes http://jc3publishing.com/
23.
Costello has wrongfully used Whirled’s Registered Trademarks, Cue Sheet
Music Mark, WWM Trademark, and Whirled’s name in connection with his Competing
Business.
24. The website for Costello’s Competing Business at www.jc3publishing.com
also contains images of film and TV posters that are intended to deceive and imply that
Costello, rather than Whirled, placed and licensed the subject compositions and recordings
in such films and TV programs. Costello was a staff composer of Whirled and played no
role in such licenses and placements. Such implication is made by Costello to deceive the
users of film and TV music, including Whirled’s clients and licensees, into thinking that it
was Costello and not Whirled who was responsible for obtaining said music licenses and
placements.
Plaintiff’s Claims
FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF
DECLARATORY JUDGMENT REGARDING COPYRIGHT OWNERSHIP
25. Whirled re-alleges and incorporates each and every allegation contained in
the paragraphs above as if fully set forth herein.
26.
There is an actual, substantial and judiciable controversy between Whirled
and Costello concerning Whirled’s right to license, publish, and otherwise exploit the
musical works that Costello composed while working for Whirled, as well as the musical
works he promised to contribute for his shares in Whirled.
27. The scope of this controversy was recently significantly narrowed as a result
of the Amended Declaratory Judgment Order (Doc. 32) entered pursuant to the stipulation
of the parties. The only musical works composed from January 1, 2004 through December
Case 2:15-cv-02111-GMS Document 34 Filed 04/21/16 Page 7 of 34
8/17/2019 Whirled Music Pub. v. Costello amended complaint.pdf
8/34
8
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
31, 2014 that remain at issue in terms of copyright ownership are This Woman, Time
Heals, and Celebrity. With respect to pre-2004 musical works, the copyright ownership
dispute focuses on copyright ownership of the musical works that Costello contributed to
Whirled for his shares and/or composed for Whirled after its formation through December
31, 2003.
28. Whirled is entitled to a judicial declaration that it is the sole owner of the
copyrights to the musical works that Costello composed for Whirled after its formation
through December 31, 2003 , as well as This Woman, Time Heals, and Celebrity, based on:
a. The musical works being “works made for hire” under an employer-
employee relationship and therefore Whirled is the sole owner of said
musical works pursuant to the Copyright Act’s work-for-hire provisions;
b. Costello transferring and assigning “all right, title, and interest” in all musical
works composed for Whirled in the future in the May 20, 2002 minutes of
Whirled’s first board meeting signed by Costello (see Exhibit 1); and/or
c. One or more other notes, memorandums, or instruments of conveyance in
writing and signed by Costello and/or his duly authorized agents, including
but not limited to: (i) Production Agreement dated June 13, 2007 but
effective retroactively as of May 1, 2002 by and between Costello, Hilker,
another third party author and Whirled; (ii) Production Agreement dated
October 1, 2008 by and between Costello, Hilker, another third-party author
and Trifecta Holdings, LLC (“Trifecta”), which is wholly owned by Whirled;
(iii) Production Agreement dated October 21, 2013 by and between Costello,
Hilker, and two other third-party authors and Trifecta; (iv) Production
Agreement dated May 20, 2010 by and between Costello, Hilker, and several
other third-party authors and Trifecta, as amended by the addendum signed
by all of the parties dated as of November 20, 2010; (v) Production
Case 2:15-cv-02111-GMS Document 34 Filed 04/21/16 Page 8 of 34
8/17/2019 Whirled Music Pub. v. Costello amended complaint.pdf
9/34
9
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Agreement dated April 9, 2012 by and between Costello, Hilker, another
third-party author and Trifecta; and (vi) Production Agreement dated October
26, 2011 by and between Costello, Hilker, and two other third-party authors
and Whirled. These are collectively referred to hereinafter as the
“Production Agreements.”
29. The notes, memorandums, or instruments of conveyance referenced in
subsection (c) above also include the written and signed partnership agreements between
Costello and Hilker. Such partnership agreements transferred Costello’s musical
compositions and related sound recordings to the partnerships that in turn transferred them
ultimately to Whirled. Such assignments are reflected by the custom and course of dealing
between Costello and Whirled for over a decade.
30. With respect the musical works that Costello and Hilker agreed to contribute
through their partnerships for their shares, Whirled is entitled to a judicial declaration
against Costello that it is the sole owner of all of these compositions (whether composed by
Costello, Hilker, or both of them) and related musical sound recordings because the May
20, 2002 shareholder minutes signed by Costello and Hilker qualify as a note,
memorandum, or instrument of conveyance in writing and signed by them transferring the
musical works to Whirled.
SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF
DECLARATORY JUDGMENT REGARDING SHARES
31. Whirled re-alleges and incorporates each and every allegation contained in
the paragraphs above as if fully set forth herein.
32.
In the event the Court determines that Whirled is not the sole owner of the
musical works that Costello promised to contribute to Whirled in exchange for his shares,
including the musical works he composed for Whirled after its formation through
December 31, 2003, there is an actual, substantial and judiciable controversy regarding
Case 2:15-cv-02111-GMS Document 34 Filed 04/21/16 Page 9 of 34
8/17/2019 Whirled Music Pub. v. Costello amended complaint.pdf
10/34
10
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
whether Costello is a shareholder in Whirled.
33. If the May 20, 2002 shareholder minutes signed by Costello do not qualify as
a note, memorandum, or instrument of conveyance of such musical works to Whirled, then
there has been a failure of consideration and Whirled is entitled to a declaration that
Costello does not own any shares in Whirled because he did not pay any consideration for
the shares.
THIRD CLAIM FOR RELIEF
RESTITUTION
34. Whirled re-alleges and incorporates each and every allegation contained in
the paragraphs above as if fully set forth herein.
35. With respect to the musical works that Costello composed for Whirled after
its formation through December 31, 2003, in the event the Court determines that Costello
was an independent contractor rather than employee, then Whirled is entitled to restitution
of the payments it made to Costello premised on Whirled receiving the copyrights to such
musical works in exchange for such payments.
36. Plaintiffs conferred a benefit on Costello by paying such wages and
employee benefits.
37. Costello was unjustly enriched by receiving such wages and employee
benefits.
38. Under the circumstances, in good conscience, Costello is required to make
restitution to Whirled.
FOURTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF
BREACH OF CONTRACT
39. Whirled re-alleges and incorporates each and every allegation contained in
the paragraphs above as if fully set forth herein.
40. In the event the Court determines that Whirled is not the sole owner of the
Case 2:15-cv-02111-GMS Document 34 Filed 04/21/16 Page 10 of 34
8/17/2019 Whirled Music Pub. v. Costello amended complaint.pdf
11/34
11
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
musical works that Costello promised to contribute to Whirled in exchange for his shares,
then Costello breached his agreement reflected in the May 20, 2002 shareholder minutes to
assign such musical works to the company.
41.
With respect to the musical works that Costello composed for Whirled after
its formation through December 31, 2003, in the event the Court determines that Whirled is
not the sole owner of such musical works, then Costello breached his verbal employment
agreement with Whirled that the company would receive title to such compositions in
exchange for employing him.
42. In the event the Court determines that Whirled is not the sole owner of the
musical works that are the subject of the Production Agreements, then Costello breached
the Production Agreements by failing to deliver the copyrights to these songs.
43. Costello’s breaches have damaged Whirled by depriving it of ownership of
and the ability to profit from Costello’s compositions.
44. This claim arises out of contract for purposes of an attorneys’ fees award
under A.R.S. § 12-341.01
FIFTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF
INFRINGEMENT OF REGISTERED TRADEMARKS IN VIOLATION OF 15
U.S.C. § 1114(1)
45. Whirled re-alleges and incorporates each and every allegation contained in
the paragraphs above as if fully set forth herein.
46. Costello is actually aware of Whirled’s Registered Trademarks and
Whirled’s rights in and to such Registered Trademarks, prior to adopting and using
Whirled’s Registered Trademarks in connection with Costello’s Competing Business.
47. Costello purchased the URLs as listed in the table in paragraph 23 above and
lists “WWM” as the name of organization affiliated with the name. The websites at these
URLs redirects to Costello’s website at http://jc3publishing.com/ as indicated in the table
Case 2:15-cv-02111-GMS Document 34 Filed 04/21/16 Page 11 of 34
8/17/2019 Whirled Music Pub. v. Costello amended complaint.pdf
12/34
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
set forth in paragraph 23 above.
48. Upon information and belief, Costello chose to use Whirled’s Registered
Trademarks in the purchased URLs to confuse and deceive customers that their goods were
associated with, approved by, or sponsored by Whirled and a part of Whirled’s business.
49. The services offered by Costello’s in connection with his Competing
Business are directly competitive with Whirled’s business provided under its Registered
Trademarks.
50. Whirled currently has no association, affiliation, sponsorship, or any other
connection to Costello, except to the extent Costello is a shareholder in Whirled and is a
fiduciary of Whirled by virtue of being a Director of Whirled.
51. Upon information and belief, such deception and confusion was intentional
and designed by Costello to trade off of and capitalize on Whirled’s goodwill and
reputation. The aforesaid infringement by Costello was committed willfully, knowingly,
maliciously, and in conscious disregard of Whirled’s rights.
52. The aforesaid infringement by Costello has caused, and unless restrained by
this Court will continue to cause, immediate and irreparable injury to Whirled’s property
and Business.
53. Costello’s use of Whirled’s Registered Trademarks is likely to cause
confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive as to origin, sponsorship, or approval of
Costello’s goods, services, or commercial activities, in violation of Section 32(1) of the
Lanham Act (15 U.S.C. § 1114(1)).
54. Upon information and belief, Costello’s conduct constitutes willful and
malicious infringement of Whirled’s Registered Trademarks under 15 U.S.C. § 1114, thus
rendering the present case as an “exceptional” case as that term is employed in 15 U.S.C. §
1117.
55. Whirled has no adequate remedy at law.
Case 2:15-cv-02111-GMS Document 34 Filed 04/21/16 Page 12 of 34
8/17/2019 Whirled Music Pub. v. Costello amended complaint.pdf
13/34
13
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
SIXTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF
TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT IN VIOLATION OF 15 U.S.C. § 1125(A)
56. Whirled re-alleges and incorporates each and every allegation contained in
the paragraphs above as if fully set forth herein.
57.
Costello’s use of Whirled’s Registered Trademarks is likely to cause
confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive as to origin, sponsorship, or approval of
Costello’s good and services, or commercial activities, in violation of Section 43(a) of
the Lanham Act (15 U.S.C. § 1125(a)).
58. The aforesaid infringement by Costello was committed willfully, knowingly,
maliciously, and in conscious disregard of Whirled’s rights.
59. The aforesaid infringement by Costello has caused, and unless restrained by
this Court will continue to cause, immediate and irreparable injury to Whirled’s property
and business.
60. Whirled has no adequate remedy at law.
SEVENTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF
COMMON LAW INFRINGEMENT OF WHIRLED’S CUE SHEET MUSIC
TRADEMARK AND WWM TRADEMARK
61. Whirled re-alleges and incorporates each and every allegation contained in
the paragraphs above as if fully set forth herein.
62.
Whirled has used its Cue Sheet Music Mark in worldwide commerce in
connection with Whirled’s business since as early as 2007. Publisher trade names are
exclusive and synonymous with identifying the source of a music catalogue in the music
publishing and licensing business.
63. Whirled has used its WWM Trademark in worldwide commerce in
connection with Whirled’s business since as early as 2002. Publisher trade names are
exclusive and synonymous with identifying the source of a music catalogue in the music
Case 2:15-cv-02111-GMS Document 34 Filed 04/21/16 Page 13 of 34
8/17/2019 Whirled Music Pub. v. Costello amended complaint.pdf
14/34
14
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
publishing and licensing business.
64. As indicated in the table in paragraph 23 above, immediately after being
terminated by Whirled, Costello purchased the URLs including www.qsheetmusic.com,
www.cuesheetmusic.com, www.cuesheetmusic.net, www.qsheetmusic.net,
www.qsheetmusic.org, www.qsheetrecords.com, www.cuesheetrecords.com,
www.vintagemastersjc3.com, www.whirledmusicjc3.com, www.fervorjc3.com, and
www.whirledjohncostello.com and he listed “WWM” as the name of organization that is
affiliated with those domain names. With the exception of www.cuesheetmusic.com and
www.fervorjc3.com, the websites all redirected to Costello’s website at
http://jc3publishing.com and were used by Costello in connection with his Competing
Business.
65. Costello had both actual and constructive knowledge of Whirled’s
ownership of and rights in its Cue Sheet Music Mark and WWM Trademark prior to
Costello’s infringing use of Whirled’s Cue Sheet Music Mark and Whirled’s WWM
Trademark.
66. Costello adopted and used in commerce Whirled’s Cue Sheet Music Mark
and Whirled’s WWM Trademark in his Competing Business, with full knowledge of
Whirled’s superior rights, and with full knowledge that his infringing use of Whirled’s Cue
Sheet Music Mark and Whirled’s WWM Trademark was intended to cause confusion,
mistake and/or deception. Further, Costello wrongfully listed WWM and used Whirled’s
WWM Trademark to indicate that the URLs www.qsheetmusic.com,
www.cuesheetmusic.com, www.cuesheetmusic.net, www.qsheetmusic.net,
www.qsheetmusic.org, www.qsheetrecords.com, www.cuesheetrecords.com,
www.vintagemastersjc3.com, www.whirledmusicjc3.com, www.fervorjc3.com, and
www.whirledjohncostello.com were somehow affiliated or associated with Whirled when
in fact they are not.
Case 2:15-cv-02111-GMS Document 34 Filed 04/21/16 Page 14 of 34
8/17/2019 Whirled Music Pub. v. Costello amended complaint.pdf
15/34
15
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
67. Costello offers his goods and services in his Competing Business under
Whirled’s Cue Sheet Music Mark and Whirled’s WWM Trademark in the same channels
of trade as those in which Whirled’s legitimate goods and services are offered.
68.
Costello’s infringing use of Whirled’s Cue Sheet Music Mark and Whirled’s
WWM Trademark in connection with Costello’s Competing Business is likely to cause,
and has caused, confusion, mistake or deception as to the affiliation, connection or
association of Costello’s Competing Business with Whirled, in violation of applicable
laws.
69. Costello’s actions were taken with the intent to trade upon the valuable
goodwill established by Whirled in its Cue Sheet Music Mark and Whirled’s WWM
Trademark.
70. As a result of Costello’s infringement, Whirled has suffered substantial
damages, as well as the continuing loss of the goodwill and reputation established by
Whirled in its Cue Sheet Music Mark and Whirled’s WWM Trademark. This continuing
loss of goodwill cannot be properly calculated and thus constitutes irreparable harm and an
injury for which Whirled has no adequate remedy at law. Whirled will continue to suffer
irreparable harm unless this Court enjoins Costello.
EIGHTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF
FEDERAL UNFAIR COMPETITION AND FALSE DESIGNATION OF ORIGIN 15
U.S.C. § 1125(A)
71. Whirled re-alleges and incorporates each and every allegation contained in
the paragraphs above as if fully set forth herein.
72.
Costello has deliberately and willfully attempted to trade on Whirled’s long-
standing and hard-earned goodwill in its Whirled’s Registered Trademarks, its Cue Sheet
Music Mark, its WWM Trademark, and the reputation established by Whirled in
connection with its products and services, as well as in order to confuse consumers as to
Case 2:15-cv-02111-GMS Document 34 Filed 04/21/16 Page 15 of 34
8/17/2019 Whirled Music Pub. v. Costello amended complaint.pdf
16/34
16
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
the origin and sponsorship of Costello’s services in his Competing Business and to pass off
his services in commerce as those of Whirled.
73. Costello’s actions were taken with the intent to trade upon the valuable
goodwill established by Whirled in its Registered Trademarks, Cue Sheet Music Mark, and
WWM Trademark.
74. In addition, Costello, without the authorization or knowledge of Whirled,
attempted to change the records of BMI to reflect that Costello was the sole author of the
musical compositions, rather than sharing authorship of the compositions with Hilker,
pursuant to the pre-existing co-author agreement and their several pre-existing
partnerships.
75. Based on information and belief, BMI did not allow Costello to engage in
such conduct and refused to allow Costello to undertake such false and fraudulent claim
and false designation of origin.
76. Further, in addition, Costello’s Competing Business website at
www.jc3publishing.com, contains images of film and TV posters that imply that Costello
and not Whirled placed and licensed the co-authored compositions and co-authored
recordings in such films when, in fact, Costello had nothing to do with such licenses and
placements. Such implication is made by Costello to deceive the users of film and TV
music into thinking Costello and not Whirled was responsible for obtaining said film and
TV music licenses and placements.
77. Further, Costello has used the services of artists and songwriters previously
affiliated with Whirled in Costello’s Competing Business.
78.
Costello’s unauthorized and tortious conduct has also deprived and will
continue to deprive Whirled of the ability to control the consumer perception of its
products and services offered under Whirled’s Registered Trademarks, Cue Sheet Music
Mark, and WWM Trademark, placing the valuable reputation and goodwill of Whirled in
Case 2:15-cv-02111-GMS Document 34 Filed 04/21/16 Page 16 of 34
8/17/2019 Whirled Music Pub. v. Costello amended complaint.pdf
17/34
17
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
the hands of Costello.
79. Costello’s aforementioned conduct is likely to cause confusion, mistake or
deception as to the affiliation, connection or association of Costello’s Competing Business
with Whirled, and as to the origin, sponsorship or approval of Whirled, in violation of
Section 43 of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a)(1).
80. As a result of Costello’s aforesaid conduct, Whirled has suffered
commercial damage, including without limitation the continuing loss of the goodwill and
reputation established by Whirled in its Registered Trademarks, Cue Sheet Music Mark,
and WWM Trademark. This continuing loss cannot be properly calculated and thus
constitutes irreparable harm and an injury for which Whirled has no adequate remedy at
law. Whirled will continue to suffer irreparable harm unless this Court enjoins Costello’s
conduct.
81. Costello’s use of Whirled’s Registered Trademarks, Cue Sheet Music Mark,
and WWM Trademark is likely to cause confusion, mistake or deception as to source,
origin, sponsorship or approval of Costello’s products and services, and constitutes
infringement of Whirled’s Registered Trademarks, Cue Sheet Music Mark, and WWM
Trademark.
82. By his actions, Costello has infringed the Registered Trademarks, Cue
Sheet Music Mark, and WWM Trademark deliberately and with the intention of
wrongfully trading on the goodwill and reputation symbolized by the Registered
Trademarks, Cue Sheet Music Mark, and WWM Trademark.
83. Whirled is entitled to an award of damages from Costello for the loss of
business and other monetary losses that Whirled has suffered and will continue to suffer in
the future as a proximate result of Costello’s misappropriation and infringement of the
Registered Trademarks, Cue Sheet Music Mark, and WWM Trademark. Alternatively,
Whirled is entitled to recover damages in an amount equivalent to the amount of profits
Case 2:15-cv-02111-GMS Document 34 Filed 04/21/16 Page 17 of 34
8/17/2019 Whirled Music Pub. v. Costello amended complaint.pdf
18/34
18
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
that Costello has derived and may continue to derive as a result of his unlawful
misappropriation and infringement of the Registered Trademarks, Cue Sheet Music Mark,
and WWM Trademark.
84.
Costello’s conduct as described above has been willful, deliberate,
malicious, and intended to injure Whirled. Therefore, Whirled is also entitled to recover
exemplary damages from Costello to punish and deter him and others similarly situated
from engaging in similar wrongful conduct in the future. Costello should also be, upon
final hearing, permanently enjoined from using the Registered Trademarks, Cue Sheet
Music Mark, and WWM Trademark.
NINTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF
UNFAIR COMPETITION UNDER A.R.S. § 44-1552
85. Whirled re-alleges and incorporates each and every allegation contained in
the paragraphs above as if fully set forth herein.
86. Costello’s unauthorized use of the Whirled’s Registered Trademarks, Cue
Sheet Music Mark, WWM Trademark, and other actions as specified herein constitutes acts
of unfair competition through Costello’s deceptive, misleading and false appropriation for
his own use of the name, brand, trademark, reputation, and goodwill of Whirled’s
Registered Trademarks, Cue Sheet Music Mark, and WWM Trademark in violation of
A.R.S. § 44-1552.
87. The aforesaid infringement by Costello was committed willfully,
knowingly, maliciously, and in conscious disregard of Whirled’s rights.
88. The aforesaid infringement by Costello has caused, and unless restrained by
this Court will continue to cause, immediate and irreparable injury to Whirled’s property
and business.
89. Whirled has no adequate remedy at law.
Case 2:15-cv-02111-GMS Document 34 Filed 04/21/16 Page 18 of 34
8/17/2019 Whirled Music Pub. v. Costello amended complaint.pdf
19/34
19
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Demand for Jury Trial
90. Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 38(a), Whirled requests a trial by jury of all issues so
triable.
WHEREFORE, Whirled prays for judgment against the Costellos as follows:
A.
For the requested declaratory relief.
B. For an award of compensatory, consequential, special, and all other damages
and restitution needed to make Whirled whole.
C. A preliminary and permanent injunction enjoining Costello, their offices,
agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and those in active concert or
participation with them who receive actual notice of the order by personal
service or otherwise, from:
(i) using, reproducing, advertising, or promoting in connection with any
product or service the Whirled’s Registered Trademarks, Cue Sheet
Music Mark, WWM Trademark, Plaintiff’s name or mark or any name
or mark confusingly similar therewith;
(ii) using, reproducing, advertising or promoting any slogan, mark, or
name that may be calculated to represent or that has the effect of
representing that the products or services of Costello or any other
person are sponsored by, authorized by, or in some way associated
with Whirled;
(iii) injuring the commercial reputation, renown, and goodwill of Whirled
or the Whirled’s Registered Trademarks, Cue Sheet Music Mark, or
WWM Trademark;
(iv) using or reproducing any word, term, name, symbol, or device, or any
combination thereof, on any product or in connection with any service
that confuses or falsely represents or misleads, is calculated to
Case 2:15-cv-02111-GMS Document 34 Filed 04/21/16 Page 19 of 34
8/17/2019 Whirled Music Pub. v. Costello amended complaint.pdf
20/34
20
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
confuse, falsely represent, or mislead, or that has the effect of
confusing, falsely representing, or misleading, that the products,
services, or activities of Costello or another are in some way
connected with Whirled, or is sponsored, approved, or licensed by
Whirled; and
(v) causing a likelihood of confusion with respect to Whirled or any
injury to the business reputation of Whirled.
D. An award of damages to Whirled under the Lanham Act, and in particular
pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1117(a), of up to three times the damages suffered by
Whirled and three times the profits earned by Costello.
E. Directing Costello to transfer to Whirled (at no cost to Whirled) all domain
names that contain or consist of Whirled’s marks, including but not limited to
the URL’s listed in paragraph 23.
F. Ordering Costello to preserve through trial and then deliver up for
destruction, pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1118, all Internet webpages/scripts/ html
code, articles, packages, wrappers, products, displays, labels, signs, circulars,
kits, packaging, letterhead, business cards, promotional items, literature, sales
aids, or other matter in the possession, custody, or under the control of
Costello or his agents bearing the Whirled’s Registered Trademarks, Cue
Sheet Music Mark, or WWM Trademark, in any manner, or any mark that is
confusingly similar to or a colorable imitation of these marks.
G. Ordering Costello to take all steps necessary to cancel any state or local
business registrations, including corporate name registrations and dba filings,
that include Whirled’s name or marks or amend those registrations to names
that do not include Whirled’s name or marks, and to remove any references
Case 2:15-cv-02111-GMS Document 34 Filed 04/21/16 Page 20 of 34
8/17/2019 Whirled Music Pub. v. Costello amended complaint.pdf
21/34
21
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
to any business registrations, including corporate names and dba filings, that
include Whirled’s name or marks.
H. Ordering Costello to retain and disclose all communications with all
individuals and entities with whom they engaged in any transaction relating
to or arising from the use of the Whirled’s Registered Trademarks, Cue Sheet
Music Mark, or WWM Trademark, names or marks, or otherwise in
furtherance of the scheme alleged herein.
I. Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1117(a), of up to three times the damages suffered by
Whirled and three times the profits earned by any and all of the Costello.
J.
The (a) forfeiture of Defendant Costello’s stock and tender back to Whirled,
(b) disgorgement by Costello of all shareholder distributions and other
shareholder benefits received by Defendant Costello since 2002, and/or (c)
payment by Costello to Whirled of an amount equal to 26.323% of the value
of Whirled to support consideration; and/or (d) ordering Costello to execute
all necessary documentation to transfer the musical works to Whirled as
consideration for his stock in Whirled.
K. For an award of treble, exemplary, and/or punitive damages.
L. For an award of attorneys’ fees and costs.
M. For an award of pre-judgment and post-judgment interest.
N. For such other and further relief as may be needed to provide Whirled with a
complete remedy.
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
Case 2:15-cv-02111-GMS Document 34 Filed 04/21/16 Page 21 of 34
8/17/2019 Whirled Music Pub. v. Costello amended complaint.pdf
22/34
22
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
DATED this 21st day of April, 2015.
TIFFANY & BOSCO P.A.
By: /s/ Christopher A. LaVoy
Christopher A. LaVoySeventh Floor Camelback Esplanade II2525 East Camelback RoadPhoenix, Arizona 85016-4237
Connie J. MablesonCONNIE J. MABLESON, PLLC1938 East Osborn RoadPhoenix, Arizona 85016
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Case 2:15-cv-02111-GMS Document 34 Filed 04/21/16 Page 22 of 34
8/17/2019 Whirled Music Pub. v. Costello amended complaint.pdf
23/34
23
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on April 21, 2016, I electronically transmitted the attached
document to the Clerk’s Office using the CM/ECF System for filing and transmittal of a
Notice of Electronic Filing to all CM/ECF registrants for this case.
By: s/Christopher A. LaVoy
Case 2:15-cv-02111-GMS Document 34 Filed 04/21/16 Page 23 of 34
8/17/2019 Whirled Music Pub. v. Costello amended complaint.pdf
24/34
Exhibit 1
Case 2:15-cv-02111-GMS Document 34 Filed 04/21/16 Page 24 of 34
8/17/2019 Whirled Music Pub. v. Costello amended complaint.pdf
25/34
WAIVEROFNOTICD
The
undersigned,
constituting
all of
tle
Directors
of
the Board
for WHIRLEI)
MUSIC-PIIBLISHING,
INC.,
an Arizona
corporation,
do hereby
waive
call
and
notice
of call of
tlre
time,
place,
and purpose
of
the
SpEcial
Meeting
of
tlie
Board
of
Directors
of
slid
corporation,_and
do hereby
consent
that stid
meeting be held
on
E?-td-
at
the Corporate
offrce.
This
meetiqg
will
be for. the
purpose
oftransacting
such
business as
may
be
properly
brought before the meeting.
Ü
Case 2:15-cv-02111-GMS Document 34 Filed 04/21/16 Page 25 of 34
8/17/2019 Whirled Music Pub. v. Costello amended complaint.pdf
26/34
WAIVER
OF
NOTICE
We,
the
undersigned shareholders,
constituting all
ofthe
shareholders
of
WHIRLED MUSIC
PUBLISIIING, INC., an
Arizona
corporation,
do
hereby
waive
call
and
notice of call of
the
time,
place,
and
purpose
of the
Initial
Meeting of the
Shareholders ofsaid corporation,
and do hereby consent that said meeting be held
on the
following date at the corporate
office for
the
purposes
of
transacting such business as may
be
properly
brought before
the
meeting.
In addition, the undersigned shareholders agree
on
a
Board of Directors
consisting
of the following individuals; Jeffrey Freundlich,
David Hilker, and John Costello
III
each
to
hold office
until his/her successor shall
have
been
duly
elected
and
qualified.
DAVID THO‡Wá¼S DIETCHE
ELAN FREYDINSON
GARY RO‡WERO
JOSHU FIORITO SHIMKIN
RACHEL WENSTEIN
Ü
Case 2:15-cv-02111-GMS Document 34 Filed 04/21/16 Page 26 of 34
8/17/2019 Whirled Music Pub. v. Costello amended complaint.pdf
27/34
MINUTES OF'TIIE
FIRST
MEETING
OF
THE BOARD
OF
DIRECTORS OF
WHIRLED
MUSIC
PUBLISHING,
INC.
The first
meeting
of
the Board of
Directors
of WIIIRLED
MUSIC
PUBLISHING,
INC.,
an Arizona
corporation,
was held
at the offrces
of Sigrist
&
Cheek,
PC, 5777 South
Rural
Road,
Tempe,
AZ 85283.
All of
the
Directors
named
in
the
Articles of
Incorporation
waived call
and notice
of
call of
the
meeting
in writing,
a
copy
of
which is
filed with
these
Minutes, and
the
following
Directors
were
present, to
wit.
JEFFREY
FREUNDLICH
DAVID HILKER
JOHN
COSTELLO
III
DAVID
HILKER
acted
as
Chairman
of
the
meeting,
and
JOHN
COSTELLO
III recorded
the
Minutes'
The
chairman
stated
that
the
Articles of Incorporation
had been
filed
with
the
Arizona
Corporation
Commission,
would
be
duly
and
properly
published
in accordance
with
A.R.S.3ection
10-055,
and
that
the
corporation
was
now
qualified to transact
business.
Themeetingthenproceededtotheelectionofoffrcersandthefollowingofficers
were
unanimously
elected:
DAVID
HILKER
PTCSidCNt
JEFFREY
FREUNDLICH
Chief
Operating
Officer
JOHN
COSTELLO
III
SecretarY
each
to
hold
office
until
his/her
successor
shall
have
been
duly
elected
and
qualified'
Case 2:15-cv-02111-GMS Document 34 Filed 04/21/16 Page 27 of 34
8/17/2019 Whirled Music Pub. v. Costello amended complaint.pdf
28/34
The
Chairman
presented
to
the
meeting
a
proposed
form
of
Bylaws
and,
on
motion duly made and
seconded,
the following resolution
was
unanimously
adopted:
RESOLVED,
that the
form
of
Bylaws
which has been
submitted
to the meeting
be, and
it hereby
is,
approved
and adopted as the Bylaws
ofthe corporation,
and
that
the
Secretary be and hereby
is
instructed
to
insert the
same
in the corporate minute book.
The Chairman then
presented
a
proposed
form
of certificate for the
shares
of
stock
of the corporation.
On
motion
duly made and seconded,
the
following
resolution
was
unanimously
adopted:
RESOLVED,
that the
form of
certificate
representing
shares ofthe
capital stock
of
the
corporation
which has
been submitted to this meeting
be, and the
same
is in
all
respects, approved and adopted as the form of certificate
to
represent
the capital
stock of
this corporation.
The matter
of
a
depository
and
corporate
accounts was
considered
and
thereupon,
on
motion
duly made and seconded, the
following
resolutions were
unanimously
adopted:
RESOL
be opened at
Arizona, and
that
the checks ofthe
corporation on
said
account be signed by the following individuals:
V”`
'ƒI
%T‚Â
• Jtte bmk accou•¡
‚ ¨
md h icnmeof•¡
e co‚ÁOr•g
On
,1•¡
‹ r
ž ²
û
ƒI • ñ
‘ Ê
RESOLVED
FURTHER, that the resolution
or resolutions required
by said Bank
for
opening
ofsaid
bank account
and
the signing
ofsaid
checks
hereinbeforc
set forth be,
and the
same
hereby is,
considered
as
passed
at
this meeting,
and that a copy ofsaid
resolution in
the usual card
form
used by said Bank
be attached to these Minutes.
RESOLVED FURTHER,
that the Secretary is hereby
authorized to certi$,
to the
passage
ofsaid resolution
as
required
by
said
Bank
at the
meeting
ofthe
Board
of
Directors
as of
this
date.
The Chairman
stated
that the
corporation
had
not
authorized the
issuance
ofany
stock. He
further stated
that it
was
deemed
advisable
that any stock issued should
be
issued
so
as
to qualifu
as
"Section
1244
Stock"
pursuant
to
the
Intemal
Revenue Code
of
1986,
Section
1244.
Thereupon,
the
plan
to
authorize 100,000
qualiSing
Section
1244
shares of
common stock contained
in
Exhibit A was
duly
proposed
and
unanimously
adopted.
Case 2:15-cv-02111-GMS Document 34 Filed 04/21/16 Page 28 of 34
8/17/2019 Whirled Music Pub. v. Costello amended complaint.pdf
29/34
The
Chairman
then
stated
that the
following individuals
had
offered
to
purchase
the following number
of
shares
of this corporation's
common stock
at
no-par value
per
share:
TOTAL ISSUED
2,500 0 SIIARES
2,500 0 SHARES
2,500,O SIL•R RES
189 0 SHARES
940 0 SIL•R
RES
377 5 SHARES
125 0 SIL•R RES
377 5 SHARES
491 0 SHARES
10,000 SIIARES
for the
consideration
set forth
in Exhibit
B attached
hereto.
The Chairman
pointed out that shares
issued by the corporation
upon
its
acceptance
ofsuch
offer
would
not be registered
and
could
be
issued and
sold only
in
reliance
upon
an
exemption
from
the registration
requirements
of the Securities
Act
of
1933
and
the Arizona
Securities
Act.
The
issuees staled
that
they
were
purchasing the
stock
for
investment
puq)oses only,
that they
understood
the
risks attendant
to such
a
purchase, and
that they
had complete
knowledge
ofthe
financial
condition
ofthe
tusiness.
They stated
that
they were
bona
fide
residents
of the State
of Arizona,
and that
the company's
business
would be
conducted
solely
in Arizona.
Thereupon,
the following
resolutions
were duly
proposed
and unanimously
adopted:
WHEREAS,
it
is
deemed
advisable
by the
Board
of
Directors
that
this
corporation
offer
for
sale,
and issue
shares
of
common
stock
authoizedby
its Articles
of
Incorporation;
and
WHEREAS,itisfurtherdeemedadvisablebytheBoardofDirectorsthatthe
offer,
sale,
and
issuance
of such
shares
be
effectuated
in such
a manner
that
qualified
stockholders
may
receive
the benefits
of
the
Intemal
Revenue
code of
1954,
Section
1244;
and
WHEREAS,theproposedissueeshaveofferedtosubscribeforandpurchasea
total
of10,000
shares
of
the
common
capital
stock
ofthe
corporation
for the
consideration
as
shown
in Exhibit
B attached
hereto;
and
WHEREAS,
it is in
the best
interests
of
the corporation
that
such
subscription
for
its common
capital
stock
should
be
accepted;
DAVID HILKER
JEFFREY FREUNDLICH
JOIIN COSTELLO Hl
DANIEL GABAY
DAVID THONIAS DIETCHE
ELAN FREYDENSON
GARY ROMERO
JOSHU FIORITO SHIMKIN
RACHEL WEINSTEIN
Case 2:15-cv-02111-GMS Document 34 Filed 04/21/16 Page 29 of 34
8/17/2019 Whirled Music Pub. v. Costello amended complaint.pdf
30/34
NOW, THEREFORE,
BE
IT RESOLVED,
that
the aforesaid subscription
for
10,000
shares
of common
capital stock
of
this corporation
shall be and
it hereby, is
accepted;
and
that
upon receipt
of
payment therefor, the
officers
shall
be and
they hereby
are
authorized
and
directed to
issue
certificates
for such
shares
as being
fully
paid
and
nonassessable;
and
BE
IT FURTHER
RESOLVED,
that
the certificate
or
certificates
for such
shares
so
subscribed
and
purchased shall
conspicuously
bear
a
such
legends
required
by
the
Bylaws;
and
BE
IT
FURTHER
RESOLVED,
that
the
Treasurer
enter a certificate
of receipt in
the corporate
minute
book
evidencing
delivery
of the
consideration
received
and such
other
documents
as
may
be
necessary.
The
next matter
brought
to
the Board
for discussion
by the Chairman
was the
selection
of
a fiscal
year
for
the
corporation.
The
chairman
suggested
that
a
fiscal
year
terminating
on
DECEMBER
31 be
adopted.
After
a
full
discussion
and
upon
motion
duly
made
and seconded,
a
resolution
was unanimously
passed adopted
DECEMBER
31
as
ihe
fiscal
year
end
for
the
corporation,
and
the
Secretary
was instructed
to
notiry such
agencies
as
necessary
ofselection
of
the
same.
The
chairman
then
announced
that,
in accordance
with the
Business
corporation
Act
ofthe
state ofArizona,
it
would
be
necessaly
to
determine
the amount
of
money
which
should
be
allocated
to
stated
capital
ofthe
corporation.
The
chairman
stated that
he
had been
in
contact
with
the
corporation's
accountant,
who
gave
an
explanation
of
stated
capital.
Following
such
explanation,
upon
motion
duly
made, seconded,
and
unanimously carried,
it
was:
RESOLVED,
that the
entire
dollar
amount
of
the
issued and
outstanding
common
stock
ofthe
corporation
be
allocated
to stated
capital.
The
next discussion
entered
into by the
Board
involved
the
Medical
Reimbursement
Plan
contained
in
Exhibit
c.
wherefore,
the
Board decided
that
a
reimbursement
plan
would
be
desirable
to the
Corporation.
Thereupon,
the
following
resolution
was duly
proposed and
unanimously
adopted:
The
Board
then
considered
a
general
resolution
authorizing
the
President
and
Secretary to execute
contracts, escrow
agreements, deeds,
deeds
oftrust,
mortgages,
trust
ug.""-"ntr,
and
other
forms
of instruments
and
documents
for and
on behalfofthe
cirporation
in
order
to
carry
out
the business
and
business
purposes
ofthe
corporation.
upon
motion
duly
made
and
seconded,
the
following
resolutions
were
unanimously
adopted:
RESOLVED,
that
the
duly
elected
President
and Secretary
of this
corporation,
including
both
those
presently
holding office
and
those
elected
in
the future,
are
Case 2:15-cv-02111-GMS Document 34 Filed 04/21/16 Page 30 of 34
8/17/2019 Whirled Music Pub. v. Costello amended complaint.pdf
31/34
authorized and empowered in
the
name
of and on behalfofthis corporation to
enter into
all contracts
and
commitments
and to do
any
and all acts necessary for
the
accomplishment
of the
puposes
of this
corporation,
including
the borrowing of
money
in
any :unount, with or without secudty therefor, and to execute any and all documents
deemed by
them necessary for the
conduct
ofsuch business,
including by way of
illustration, but
not
limited
to,
notes,
deeds,
mortgages,
deeds
of
trust,
bills ofsale,
conditional
sales
contracts, security agreements, financing statements,
purchase
agreements, assignments,
leases,
and,
in
general,
all instruments
or
documents whether
similar
or
dissimilar
to
those
named
by
way
if
illustration, except that the Secretary
shall
not execute any such
instrument or documents except in attestation ofthe authority ofthe
President to execute
the
said
instrument, to
purchase
office
supplies,
fumiture, and
equipment necessary to operate
and
maintain
the business ofthe corporation, to
procure
all
forms of insurance as
may
become necessary
for
the
protection
of
the corporation
and
the conduct
of
its business, to
procure
all licenses that
may be needed for the conduct
of
the corporations business
and to engage
the
services ofall
attomeys and accountants,
and
generally
to
conduct the
business
ofthe corporation as the
General
Manager thereof.
BE
IT
FURTHER RESOLVED,
that
if
a
party
involved in such transaction
requests or
requires a resolution ofthe Board
of Directors specifically authorizing
all
or
any
portion
ofsuch
transaction
or a resolution a
particular form,
the
President
and/or
Secretary
may certiry
such resolution as having
been
authorized
and deemed adopted at
this meeting,
whereupon
a
copy
ofsuch
certification
shall
be inserted in the corporation
minute
book; and
BE
IT
FURTHER
RESOLVED, that the officers of
the
corporation
be, and
they
hereby are further authorized
and
empowered
to do
any
and
all other
and
further
things
and
matters, ofevery
nature whatsoever, which such officers,
in their
sole
and
unlimited
discretion
shall
deem
necessary or
proper
for
the purpose
of
effectuating
and
carrying out
the intent and
purposes
ofthe resolution heretofore
adopted at this
meeting,
looking
toward
the
completion
of all acts and matters
in connection with the full organization
and
operations
of the
corporation, and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED,
that
all acts and things
heretofore done for
and on
behalf and
in
the name
ofthe corporation by the
incorporator,
JEFFREY
FREUNDLICH be,
and the same hereby are,
ratified, and affirmed
in
each,
all, and
every
respect.
There behg no furtherbISttSS„_
'?mcbtt„K
Ë
motion,
duly made and
seconded,
adjoumed.
Secretary
Case 2:15-cv-02111-GMS Document 34 Filed 04/21/16 Page 31 of 34
8/17/2019 Whirled Music Pub. v. Costello amended complaint.pdf
32/34
FORSALE
OF
WHIRLED
MUSIC
PUBLISHING,
INC.
WHEREAS,
The Board of
Directors deem
it
advisable
and in the best
interest of
the Corporation
to offer for
sale and issue
shares of
common stock
in the total amount of
not
more than
100,000
in the
manner such
that in the
hand
of
qualified
stockholders such
shares
of stock
will
receive
the benefits of
Section
1244
of
the Intemal
Revenue Code of
1954,
as
amended;
and
Whereas,
the
corporation
is
a
"small
business
corporation"
as
defined
in Section
1244
(3)
2, in
that:
the
sum
of the
aggregate
amount
of
money
and
other
property received
by
the
corporation
for stock,
as
a contribution
to
capital,
and as
paid-in
surplus,
does
not
exceed
1,000,000.00;
and
whereas,
there
is not
now
outstanding
any
prior offering
ofthe
corporation to
sell
or
issue
any of
its stock,
Now
therefore,
it is
hereby
resolved that
the
proper
officers
ofthe
corporation
are
hereby
authorized
and
directed
to offer,
payable in
cash
or other
property
(other
than
stock
or
securities)
as from
time
to time they
deem
to
be
in
the
best
interests ofthe
Corporation,
subject
to the
following:
1.
The
plan as herein
set
forth
upon
its
adoption
by the
Board
of
Directors
of
the
Corporation
shall
become
effective.
2.
The
corporation
is
authorized
to offer
and
issue
100,000
shares
of
common
stock
ofno
par value.
Case 2:15-cv-02111-GMS Document 34 Filed 04/21/16 Page 32 of 34
8/17/2019 Whirled Music Pub. v. Costello amended complaint.pdf
33/34
3.
The
corporation shall
offer and
issue
such shares of
common stock
from
the
date
hereof until sold,
or
to
the date when the corporation
shall make a subsequent
offering of any stock, whichever
shall
occur
sooner.
4.
During such
period
as set
forth in
paragraph
3, the corporation
shall
offer
and issue
only
such
common stock.
5.
The maximum amount
to be
received
by
the
corporation in consideration
of the
stock
to be issued
pursuant
to
this
plan
shall
be
no more than
$1,000,000.
6.
Such
common stock
shall
be
issued
only for
money
and other
property
(other
than
stock or securities).
7.
Such
other action
shall be taken by the
corporations as
such
quali$
the
stock offered
and issued under this plan
as
"Section
1244
Stock",
and as such
term
is
defined in
the Intemal Revenue
Code
and the
Regulations
issued
thereunder.
This
plan
shall be interpreted
and construed
in
such a maru{er
as
will
enable
it
to
qualifu
as a
plan
meeting
the
requirements
of Section
1244 of thc Intemal
Revenue
Code
of 1954,
as amended, and as
will
enable
the
share of
cgtpofl slock
ilsued thereunder
to
DAVID
Approved
and adopted
by the Board
of Directors
on the
quatify
as a
plan
meeting
the
requirements
ofSection
1244 of thc
Ir
of 1954,
as amended, and as wr.l.l
enable
the
share
of
crymor{ slock
qualifu
as
"Section
1244
Stock", as
define;\n said
S{tibn.
,
,
'"",
, i-l
day
20
f
Case 2:15-cv-02111-GMS Document 34 Filed 04/21/16 Page 33 of 34
8/17/2019 Whirled Music Pub. v. Costello amended complaint.pdf
34/34
Case 2:15-cv-02111-GMS Document 34 Filed 04/21/16 Page 34 of 34