Date post: | 19-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
View: | 214 times |
Download: | 0 times |
White-Light Flares: TRACE and RHESSI Observations
H. Hudson (UCB),
T. Metcalf & J. Wolfson (LMSAL),
L. Fletcher & J. Khan (Glasgow)
White-Light Flares
• “White light” is formed deep in the solar atmosphere and is therefore energetically important (also note “white-light prominences”)
• White-light (and UV) continuum emission associates well, at least in part, with the hard X-ray impulsive phase
• There are some observations from space prior to TRACE (Yohkoh; Matthews et al., 2003), but TRACE and RHESSI are better
• There are now also infrared observations of solar flares (1.56, the “opacity minimum”; Xu et al. 2004)
April 18, 2023 RHESSI Locarno June 9, 2005 7
Contribution functions
• A given feature in the spectrum forms over a range of [heights], following the transfer of radiation in a given model (the contribution function)
• Work reported by H. Uitenbroek at SPD (May 2005) generalizes this concept to response functions dependent on temperature or magnetic changes in a dynamical model
• One-D radiation hydrodynamics modeling (e.g., Allred and Hawley) should account for this subtlety, and it may be less important for the continuum
Observational questions to be asked for WLFs
• What are the observational characteristics of the new TRACE capability?
• Is the white-light/hard X-ray association always there?
• Do the TRACE broad-band observations differ morphologically from earlier observations?
• Do white light and UV sources match?
• Is white-light emission present in every flare in a proportional manner?
Initial database
• TRACE catalog => events with <10 s cadence in white light and full resolution, GOES C and above
• Total event list consists of 33 events during RHESSI operations through 2004
• 11 well-covered events (X: 0; M: 7; C: 4)
• All 11 events have TRACE WL response
• All 11 events have RHESSI hard X-ray response
Initial database
• TRACE catalog => events with <10 s cadence in white light and full resolution, GOES C and above
• Total event list consists of 33 events during RHESSI operations through 2004
• 11 well-covered events (X: 0; M: 7; C: 4)
• All 11 events have TRACE WL response
• All 11 events have RHESSI hard X-ray response of course!
TRACE
• The TRACE white light channel has significant contributions from 1700 Å to 1 m
• The TRACE pixel size is 0.5”
• TRACE WL images show solar granulation, sunspots and faculae similar to other imaging at short wavelengths
• UV contributions to the white light channel can be reduced by subtracting the TRACE 1700 channel.
April 18, 2023 RHESSI Locarno June 9, 2005 12
TRACE spectralResponse
Solar-cycle modulation(Lean, 1997)
RHESSI-TRACE WLF event list
25-JUL-02 03:55:00 03:58:00 04:03:00 C2.7 TRACE RHESSI 0039 S13E46 3-sigma 26-JUL-02 18:57:00 19:03:00 19:06:00 M1.0 TRACE RHESSI 0044 S21E21 4-OCT-02 05:34:00 05:38:00 05:41:00 M4.0 TRACE RHESSI 0137 S19W09 5-OCT-02 10:39:00 10:46:00 10:48:00 M1.2 TRACE RHESSI ?? ?? 12-NOV-02 17:58:00 18:18:00 18:24:00 C9.9 TRACE RHESSI 0180 S11W75 12-JUN-03 01:04:00 01:30:00 01:52:00 M7.3 TRACE RHESSI 0375 N13W65 23-OCT-03 02:35:00 02:41:00 02:44:00 M2.4 TRACE RHESSI 0484 N03E15 9-JAN-04 01:33:00 01:44:00 01:54:00 M3.2 TRACE RHESSI 0537 N02E49 22-JUL-04 00:14:00 00:32:00 00:43:00 M9.1 TRACE RHESSI 0652 N03E17 24-JUL-04 00:34:00 00:39:00 00:41:00 C1.6 TRACE RHESSI N12W03 24-JUL-04 13:31:00 13:37:00 13:45:00 C4.8 TRACE RHESSI 0652 N04W16
• C7.8 13-Feb-02• WL contrast ~20%• noise @ 1.8% per pixel• WL observed during RHESSI 25-50 keV• UV contours relatively extended• WL sources are patches unresolved by TRACE
WL+1700A WL difference
April 18, 2023 RHESSI Locarno June 9, 2005 17
TRACE WL TRACE 1700 A
QuickTime™ and aYUV420 codec decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
April 18, 2023 RHESSI Locarno June 9, 2005 18
A gradual white-light event: WL occursin the impulsive phase
April 18, 2023 RHESSI Locarno June 9, 2005 20
QuickTime™ and aYUV420 codec decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
April 18, 2023 RHESSI Locarno June 9, 2005 23
World’s record white-light flare: a C1.3!!
GOES 1-8Aderivative
Raw WL Difference
April 18, 2023 RHESSI Locarno June 9, 2005 24
Conclusions
• WL emission, as seen by TRACE, shows rapid small-scale features and closely resembles the UV morphology
• The data confirm the impulsive-phase association with hard X-rays, also found for extended non-thermal phase
• Sources may be extended in area, but include many tiny (arc-s scale) emission patches
• The data are consistent with the idea that white light correlates with total flare energy
• Extended events show similar morphology and don’t require further classification
• Contrasts can exceed 100%
Observational questions half-answered
• What are the observational characteristics of the new TRACE capability? Great
• Is the white-light/hard X-ray association always there? Yes
• Do the TRACE broad-band observations differ morphologically from earlier observations? Somewhat
• Do white light and UV sources match? TBD
• Is white-light emission present in every flare in a proportional manner? Yes
April 18, 2023 RHESSI Locarno June 9, 2005 26
Tentative findings
• WLF contrasts in the very broad-band TRACE response do not differ much from Carrington’s => low temperatures
• All flares are WLFs
• TRACE WL emission can be seen in loops as well as footpoints
• WLF differs morphologically from UV emissions: more concentrated, shorter durations (nb must be careful about the “island in the tide” effect)
April 18, 2023 RHESSI Locarno June 9, 2005 27
Important open questions
• What can we learn about WLF spectra from the new data (not only TRACE, but MDI, GONG, IVM, etc…)?
• How can we get around the photometric limit of granulation/p-mode noise, plus image jitter?
• What will the improved knowledge of flare energetics tell us?