+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Whitman Richards M. I. T. Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory MURI:...

Whitman Richards M. I. T. Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory MURI:...

Date post: 18-Jan-2018
Category:
Upload: kristopher-johnston
View: 218 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
24
QuickTime™ and a TIFF (LZW) decompressor are needed to see this picture. Whitman Richards M. I. T. Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory MURI: Computational Models for Belief Revision, Group Decisions and Cultural Shifts 28 Feb 07 Modeling Small Network Dynamics
Transcript
Page 1: Whitman Richards M. I. T. Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory MURI: Computational Models for Belief Revision, Group Decisions and Cultural.

QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

Whitman Richards M. I. T. Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory

MURI: Computational Models for Belief Revision, Group Decisions and Cultural Shifts

28 Feb 07

Modeling Small Network Dynamics

Page 2: Whitman Richards M. I. T. Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory MURI: Computational Models for Belief Revision, Group Decisions and Cultural.

A Complex Network Structure

Central Staff

Core Arab

Southeast Asian

Maghreb Arab

Clumps

Node Size

Leader

Lieutenant

Other people

FateDead

Captured

Sageman & Chen, 2005

Page 3: Whitman Richards M. I. T. Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory MURI: Computational Models for Belief Revision, Group Decisions and Cultural.
Page 4: Whitman Richards M. I. T. Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory MURI: Computational Models for Belief Revision, Group Decisions and Cultural.

Militant Core => a small social network

ItzaChurchStart-up

Street GangSports TeamActivist Group

MafiaMilitiaTerrorist Cell

Leaders < 3Soldiers < 12 +/-

Supporters 10 - 50+

Page 5: Whitman Richards M. I. T. Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory MURI: Computational Models for Belief Revision, Group Decisions and Cultural.

Three Aspects of Small Groups

Goals, beliefs: sacred vs secular values

Model for Core (i.e leader-soldier relations): a network

Model for Recruitment: conformity vs consistency

Page 6: Whitman Richards M. I. T. Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory MURI: Computational Models for Belief Revision, Group Decisions and Cultural.

Part I: Recruitment

Conformity - Consistency Model (Page et al.)

Conformity: want to be like “one of the BIG guys”

Consistency: want your beliefs to be in harmony

Page 7: Whitman Richards M. I. T. Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory MURI: Computational Models for Belief Revision, Group Decisions and Cultural.
Page 8: Whitman Richards M. I. T. Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory MURI: Computational Models for Belief Revision, Group Decisions and Cultural.

A Surprise: Time to Equilibrium (mean field)

<- Group Conformity Individual Consistency ->

**

*

*

*

Page 9: Whitman Richards M. I. T. Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory MURI: Computational Models for Belief Revision, Group Decisions and Cultural.

1

Sacred Beliefs:

Page 10: Whitman Richards M. I. T. Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory MURI: Computational Models for Belief Revision, Group Decisions and Cultural.

Consanguineous Marriages (Bittles et al.)

Page 11: Whitman Richards M. I. T. Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory MURI: Computational Models for Belief Revision, Group Decisions and Cultural.

Small Network Models

1. Impossibility “Theorem”: think small !

2. New Representation: leader dominance vs bonding

Part II

Leaders < 3Soldiers < 12 +/-

Supporters 10 - 50+

Small Graphs

Page 12: Whitman Richards M. I. T. Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory MURI: Computational Models for Belief Revision, Group Decisions and Cultural.
Page 13: Whitman Richards M. I. T. Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory MURI: Computational Models for Belief Revision, Group Decisions and Cultural.

= Lukmanul Group

= Kompak Group = Afghan Ties

= Ngruki Ties

+ = Dead = Arrest

= Misc Other

= an-Nur Group = Ring Banten Group

An-Nur Group

Accommodations Group

Ring Banten Group

Kompak Group

Core Bombing Group

2004 Australian Bombing (Militant Minority) [Atran, Magourik et al]

Page 14: Whitman Richards M. I. T. Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory MURI: Computational Models for Belief Revision, Group Decisions and Cultural.

Descriptive Parameters: graphs: {# nodes, #edges}

Model Abstraction: Dominance of Leader vs Coherence of Network

Two Measures of Social Network Structure

Leadership Dominance: (Freeman, 1978)

Coherence: Watts & Strogatz (1998), Newman(2004)

{max. vtx. deg,}

{cluster coeff.}

Page 15: Whitman Richards M. I. T. Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory MURI: Computational Models for Belief Revision, Group Decisions and Cultural.

2004 Australian Bombing (Militant Minority) [Atran et al]

= Lukmanul Group

= Kompak Group = Afghan Ties

= Ngruki Ties

+ = Dead = Arrest

= Misc Other

= an-Nur Group = Ring Banten Group

An-Nur Group

Accommodations Group

Ring Banten Group

Kompak Group

Core Bombing Group

Max. Vtx. Deg = 3

# Triangles = 1

Leadership, L: ∑(MaxDeg - VtxDeg.)/(n-1)*(n-2)Coherence, C: #triangles / nC3

n = 4

Page 16: Whitman Richards M. I. T. Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory MURI: Computational Models for Belief Revision, Group Decisions and Cultural.

Key observation: as bonding increases, dominance of leader decreases

Page 17: Whitman Richards M. I. T. Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory MURI: Computational Models for Belief Revision, Group Decisions and Cultural.
Page 18: Whitman Richards M. I. T. Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory MURI: Computational Models for Belief Revision, Group Decisions and Cultural.
Page 19: Whitman Richards M. I. T. Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory MURI: Computational Models for Belief Revision, Group Decisions and Cultural.
Page 20: Whitman Richards M. I. T. Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory MURI: Computational Models for Belief Revision, Group Decisions and Cultural.
Page 21: Whitman Richards M. I. T. Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory MURI: Computational Models for Belief Revision, Group Decisions and Cultural.

Lacunae: Data lacking on…..

• Street Gang Evolution

Hmong, Haitian, Yakusa, Somali…

• Street Gang Recruitment

What’s sacred? Why join?

Buddy vs friend of friend

Roles of contact, video, email

• Mergers: from Small to Global

Page 22: Whitman Richards M. I. T. Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory MURI: Computational Models for Belief Revision, Group Decisions and Cultural.

More Lacunae

Mergers: Physical vs Virtual links; given 2 gangs,which member of each is most likely to build bridge?

Web networking: friends of friends (myspace, etc.);likely candidates for militant acts (eg High School)

How to evaluate trust in a network?

Disenchantment (return to earlier beliefs)

Email analysis: text style -> tag for hidden content (analog to voice analysis.)

Violent vs non-violent spectrum: what are key parameters?

Long term supporters (requires different model.)

Extent of strategizing; at what level? Emotional factors.

-factor: propaganda, secular vs sacred.

Page 23: Whitman Richards M. I. T. Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory MURI: Computational Models for Belief Revision, Group Decisions and Cultural.

MURI Scope

Society

Community

Individual

ContextualComplexity

Strategic Complexity

Network Complexity

Family

chess

WWII

Football

Morra, Chicken

Itza

Jihad

Street Gang

Colored Trails

Page 24: Whitman Richards M. I. T. Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory MURI: Computational Models for Belief Revision, Group Decisions and Cultural.

Decision-Making & Strategic Planning:Brian Stankiewicz, Univ. of Texas, Austin, Expt’l PsychologyAvi Pfeffer, Harvard, Computer Science

Consultants: Robert Axelrod, University of Michigan, Political Science

Marc Sageman, University of Penna., M.D., PhD.

Joshua Tenenbaum, MIT, Computation and Cognitive Science

Jenna Bednar, Univ. of Michigan, Political Science & Public PolicyScott Page, University of Michigan, Political Science & ComplexityWhitman Richards, MIT, Cognition and Artificial Intelligence

Network Structure & Evolution

The Team

Belief Structures:Scott Atran, Univ. of Michigan & John Jay, CUNY, AnthropologyDoug Medin, Northwestern University, PsychologyKen Forbus, Northwestern Univ., Computer Science and EducationMark Finlayson & P. H. Winston, MIT, Computer Science and AI


Recommended