+ All Categories
Home > Education > WHO CNS TUMORS 2016

WHO CNS TUMORS 2016

Date post: 22-Feb-2017
Category:
Upload: jaskaran-bhangu
View: 48 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
41
WHO CNS 2016 TUMORS MODERATORS: PROF.P. SARAT CHANDRA DR.RAMESH DODAMANI PRESENTED BY: DR. JASKARAN SINGH
Transcript
Page 1: WHO CNS TUMORS 2016

WHO CNS 2016 TUMORS

MODERATORS: PROF.P. SARAT CHANDRA DR.RAMESH DODAMANI

PRESENTED BY: DR. JASKARAN SINGH

Page 2: WHO CNS TUMORS 2016
Page 3: WHO CNS TUMORS 2016
Page 4: WHO CNS TUMORS 2016
Page 5: WHO CNS TUMORS 2016
Page 6: WHO CNS TUMORS 2016
Page 7: WHO CNS TUMORS 2016

WHO GRADE CRITERIA

I Special circumscribed tumors

II Cytological atypia alone

III anaplasia and mitotic activity

IV Endothelial proliferation and necrosis

Page 8: WHO CNS TUMORS 2016

CATEGORIES

Page 9: WHO CNS TUMORS 2016

CATEGORIES

Page 10: WHO CNS TUMORS 2016
Page 11: WHO CNS TUMORS 2016
Page 12: WHO CNS TUMORS 2016

WHO CNS 2016 TUMORS

Page 13: WHO CNS TUMORS 2016

WHO CNS 2016 TUMORS

Page 14: WHO CNS TUMORS 2016
Page 15: WHO CNS TUMORS 2016
Page 16: WHO CNS TUMORS 2016

ATRX loss

Page 17: WHO CNS TUMORS 2016

DIFFUSE GLIOMAS

Page 18: WHO CNS TUMORS 2016
Page 19: WHO CNS TUMORS 2016

OLIGODEDROGLIOMA• Diagnosis of oligodendroglioma and anaplastic oligodendroglioma

requires demonstration of an IDH mutation and 1p/19q co-deletion

• Oligodendroglioma is now essentially defined by a particular genetic phenotype

Page 20: WHO CNS TUMORS 2016

DIFFUSE ASTROCYTOMA• 3 categories:

– IDH-mutant: Majority of grade II and III diffuse astrocytomas– IDH-wildtype– NOS : If IDH testing is not available or cannot be fully performed

• WHO grading remains the same, even though IDH-mutant cases have a more favorable prognosis

Page 21: WHO CNS TUMORS 2016

OLIGOASTROCYTOMA??• The use of term oligoastrocytoma is discouraged.

• Designated as NOS categories—should only be rendered in absence of diagnostic molecular testing or in the very rare instance of a dual genotype oligoastrocytoma.

Page 22: WHO CNS TUMORS 2016

Not tested Cannot be classified

NOS

Page 23: WHO CNS TUMORS 2016

GLIOBLASTOMA• 3 categories:

– Glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype ~90% of cases Most often corresponds to primary GBM– Glioblastoma, IDH-mutant ~10% of cases Most often corresponds to secondary GBM– Glioblastoma, NOS Reserved for tumors for which a full IDH evaluation cannot be performed

Page 24: WHO CNS TUMORS 2016
Page 25: WHO CNS TUMORS 2016

• Epithelioid GBM: new variant– Joins giant cell GBM and gliosarcoma– Predilection for children and young adults– BRAF V600E mutation– Lacks typical IDH-wildtype GBM molecular features (EGFR and LOH 10)– Associated low-grade precursor (?PXA)

Page 26: WHO CNS TUMORS 2016

• GBM with primitve neuronal component added as a pattern– Previously GBM with PNET-like component– Diffuse glioma (any grade) with well-demarcated nodules of primitve cells with neuronal differentiation (HW rosettes, synpa +, GFAP -)– MYC and MYCN amplification– CSF dissemination– ~25% origin from lower-grade glioma (IDHm)

Page 27: WHO CNS TUMORS 2016

• Variants deleted: – Protoplasmic astrocytoma – Fibrillary astrocytoma• Entities deleted: – Gliomatosis cerebri • Now a growth pattern of any diffuse glioma

Page 28: WHO CNS TUMORS 2016

2016: Diffuse Midline Glioma, H3 K27M mutant• New entity: earlier DIPG• Histology > Pediatric GBM = Adult GBM• Molecular > Pediatric GBM ≠ Adult GBM

This behaves as a Grade 4 tumor (GBM)

Page 29: WHO CNS TUMORS 2016

PEDIATRIC ASTROCYTOMAS• PXA or pilocytic-like methylation profiles (20%)

– Subset had BRAF V600E mutations– Good prognosis

• H3 K27M mutation (34%)– Midline location (including many diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas)– Very poor prognosis

• IDH mutation (5%)– Good prognosis

Page 30: WHO CNS TUMORS 2016

OTHER ASTROCYTOMAS• Anaplastic PXA, WHO grade III – New entry – ≥ 5 mitoses / 10hpf; ± necrosis

• Pilomyxoid astrocytoma – grading redacted

Page 31: WHO CNS TUMORS 2016

EPENDYMOMAS • Present grading – questionable clinical utility• Addition: Ependymoma, RELA fusion–positive• Accounts for majority of supratentorial tumors in children.• RELA fusion: poor prognosis

Page 32: WHO CNS TUMORS 2016
Page 33: WHO CNS TUMORS 2016

MEDULLOBLASTOMAS• Generate an integrated

diagnosis that includes both the molecular group and histological phenotype.

Page 34: WHO CNS TUMORS 2016

• Classic

• Nodular

• Anaplastic

Page 35: WHO CNS TUMORS 2016
Page 36: WHO CNS TUMORS 2016

Other embryonal tumors• PNET deleted• Basis - amplification of the

C19MC region on chromosome 19 (19q13.42)• ETMR (embryonal tumors with

multilayered rosettes)• AT/RT- defined by alterations of

either INI1 or, very rarely, BRG1

Page 37: WHO CNS TUMORS 2016

Nerve sheath tumors• Melanotic schwannoma –

distinct entity

• Hybrid nerve sheath tumors

MPNST: 2 types

• Epithelioid MPNST • MPNST with perineurial

differentiation.

Page 38: WHO CNS TUMORS 2016

MENINGIOMA• Brain invasion as

criteria for atypical (Gr II) meningioma.

• Brain invasion• Mitotic count of 4 or more

• Spontaneous necrosis• Sheeting (loss of whorling or fascicular

architecture)• Prominent nucleoli• High cellularity• Small cells (tumor clusters with high

nuclear:cytoplasmic ratio).

Page 39: WHO CNS TUMORS 2016

Meningioma Grading: An Analysis of Histologic Parameters.Perry, Arie; Stafford, Scott; Scheithauer, Bernd; Suman, Vera; Lohse, ChristineAmerican Journal of Surgical Pathology. 21(12):1455-1465, December 1997.

(A) Brain invasion characterized by fingerlike or knobby protrusions into underlying cerebellar cortex. (B) No leptomeningeal layer is seen at the tumor-CNS interface.

Page 40: WHO CNS TUMORS 2016

SFT/HEMANGIOPERICYTOMA• STAT 6 nuclear expression: IHC

• Grade I: highly collagenous, relatively low cellularity, spindle cell lesion previously diagnosed as solitary fibrous tumor.• Grade II: more cellular, less collagenous tumor with plump cells and

“staghorn” vasculature that was previously diagnosed in the CNS as hemangiopericytoma.• grade III: anaplastic hemangiopericytoma in the past, diagnosed on the

basis of 5 or more mitoses per 10 high-power fields.

Page 41: WHO CNS TUMORS 2016

THANK YOU


Recommended