+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Why an “Eco-Health” Approach - UBC...

Why an “Eco-Health” Approach - UBC...

Date post: 25-Jul-2018
Category:
Upload: vuongminh
View: 218 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
41
Why an “Eco-Health” Approach Jerry Spiegel MA, MSc, PhD Director, Global Health Associate Professor Liu Institute for Global Issues School of Population & Public Health GLOBAL HEALTH GLOBAL HEALTH RESEARCH PROGRAM RESEARCH PROGRAM GLOBAL HEALTH GLOBAL HEALTH RESEARCH PROGRAM RESEARCH PROGRAM UBC [email protected]
Transcript

Why an “Eco-Health” Approach

Jerry Spiegel MA, MSc, PhDDirector, Global Health Associate Professor

Liu Institute for Global Issues School of Population & Public HealthGLOBAL HEALTH GLOBAL HEALTH RESEARCH PROGRAMRESEARCH PROGRAM

GLOBAL HEALTH GLOBAL HEALTH RESEARCH PROGRAMRESEARCH PROGRAM

[email protected]

Learning Objectives:g j

–To consider :–Why an eco-health approach was developed

–Some applications of the approach

–What the benefits could be

–What the shortcomings could beWhat the shortcomings could be

UNDERSTANDING AND ADDRESSING

(ECOSYSTEM) HEALTH

FROM A GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE

Conversion of forests to farmlands in Santa Cruz, Bolivia

• 1975: Forested landscape

Conversion of forests to farmlands in Santa Cruz, Bolivia

• 1975: Forested landscape

• 2003: Large corporate agriculturalcorporate agricultural fields transform the landscape

Global Movement of Waste

NAVIGATING COMPLEXITYActorsNeedsActivitiesResource statesConcerns

Lack of efficientand regularsweeping exacerbatesgarbagemismanagementSweeper

Help fund

Households

WardCommittee

Sweeper Hierarchy

Dispose garbageinto containers

Dispose fecal matter i l ti b

Set rules andregulations forstreet sweeping

p(loans)

KMCsweepers

Committee

Inspectors(men)

L k f t it

Money to send childrento day care orschool

in plastic bagsin street

Dispose garbagein street

Empty containersinto tractor(once a week)

p

Captain(men)

Cleanliness

Notenough

Lack of opportunityfor education &employment forchildren

Need Protectiveequipment Unblock

Pick up piles

Transport waste to Teku landfill

TractorDriver(men)

Drain CleanlinessOf streets

time to collect garbage

Health impactsof handlinggarbage

time tocollectgarbage

equipment(gloves, masks, shoes)

Hygienetraining

Sweep streets(garbageinto piles)

Unblock drainsUnblockers

(men)

StreetSweepers(women)

Citizens ignorerequest to notcarelessly throw

Massive amountsof garbage fromslaughterhouses

Illiteracyhelps upper castekeep dominationover them

garbage

Garbage containers

Awareness needed at Household level

into piles) Disposevegetablewaste in street

(women)

Expect Sweepers to clean waste

garbage everywherePeople throw garbage outwindow as soonthey see tractors

slaughterhouses

Bell system(does not work)Improved

slaughterhousegarbage management

Literacytraining

Street vendors

- David’s Nepal example

Before an ecosystem approach -lots of scientific information

After an ecosystem approach - lots of positive change

Parks

Composting

Determinants & Points of Intervention

Effi ? Eff ti ?“NEGLECTED” HEALTH SYSTEMS

I f P t

Underlying Proximate DiseasesIntermediate

Efficacy ? – Effectiveness ?Delivery ? – Scale-up ?

Health Diplomacy

Interests of wealth/power

Status of women

Poverty

Disparity

Access to d i

Malnutrition

Water

Sanitation

DiarrheaPneumoniaPerinatal women

Land tenure

Debt-SAPs

education

Job conditions

d

Sanitation

Housing

Health services

conditionsHIV/AIDSInjury

Human Security

Weak governments

Militarism

Gender issues

Civil strife

services

Health behaviors

MalariaMeaslesNTDs

l hImperialism Conflict

Global-National

Community- National

Family-Community

Individual

Health Diplomacy

Community Ecosystem ConceptCommunity Ecosystem Concept

ENVIRONMENTLiveable

COMMUNITY

HEALTH

Equitable Sustainable

Convivial Viable

ECONOMYAdequately prosperous

Source: Hancock, 1993

ECOSYSTEM APPROACH TO HUMAN HEALTHECOSYSTEM APPROACH TO HUMAN HEALTH-- a framework for setting impact objectives a framework for setting impact objectives --

Socio-culturalfactors

Source: Forget and Lebel, 2001

g p jg p j

TransdisciplinarityEquity

factors

Behaviouralf t

Natural ResourceManagement

yParticipation

factors

GlobalUnderstanding the

Determinants of Societal ResponseT H lth dIMPROVED Development

Knowledge

change

Economic

Ecosystem and Human Health

To Health and Human

Development Needs

IMPROVEDHEALTH

Development of Policies

Empowermentfactors

Environmental Human Resource Management

Empowerment

Sustainabilityfactors Management

… and a process for involving key players to achieve impact… and a process for involving key players to achieve impact

malaria

Mining activities poisoning

minersmercury

Mercury in Fishmercury

Gold market

Mercury in FishDeforestationSoil erosionAgricultural

policy, management

mercury in water

gof forest, settlement Agricultural

burningfruit

Human exposureriversides

Mercury poisoning

fruit

p g

Brazil nutChagasDisease

ACTIONSDPSEEA FRAMEWORKDRIVING FORCESDRIVING FORCESGlobal markets (perfect roses)

PRESSURES

Global markets (perfect roses)Neo-liberalism

PRESSURES

STATE

Necessicity for pesticides / Spraying

STATELevel of pesticides in air & flowers

EXPOSURES

p

EXPOSURESInhalation of workplace air

EFFECTSEFFECTSPesticide poisoning

InterpretationEvaluación

ACTIONSDPSEEA FRAMEWORKDRIVING FORCESDRIVING FORCESGlobal markets (perfect roses)DRIVING FORCESGlobal markets (perfect roses)

PRESSURES

Global markets (perfect roses)Neo-liberalism

PRESSURES

(p )Neo-liberalismPoverty, MigrationPRESSURESNecessicity for pesticides / Spraying

STATE

Necessicity for pesticides / Spraying

STATELevel of pesticides in air & flowers

Necessicity for pesticides / SprayingLow salariesSTATELevel of pesticides in air & flowers

EXPOSURES

p

EXPOSURES

Work conditions; Child care; Money anxieties

EXPOSURESInhalation of workplace airInhalation of workplace airIntensity of work; anxiety for kids

EFFECTSEFFECTSEFFECTSPesticide poisoningEFFECTSPesticide poisoningStress

InterpretationEvaluación

ACTIONSDPSEEA FRAMEWORKDRIVING FORCESDRIVING FORCESGlobal markets (perfect roses)DRIVING FORCESGlobal markets (perfect roses)

PRESSURES

Global markets (perfect roses)Neo-liberalism

PRESSURES

(p )Neo-liberalismPoverty, MigrationPRESSURESNecessicity for pesticides / Spraying

STATE

Necessicity for pesticides / Spraying

STATELevel of pesticides in air & flowers

Necessicity for pesticides / SprayingLow salariesSTATELevel of pesticides in air & flowersSTATELevel of pesticides in air & flowers

EXPOSURES

p

EXPOSURES

Work conditions; Child care; Money anxieties

EXPOSURES

Work conditions; ergonomicsChild care; Money anxieties

EXPOSURESInhalation of workplace airInhalation of workplace airIntensity of work; anxiety for kids

EFFECTS

Inhalation of workplace airIntensity of work; anxiety for kidsHandling/contact with flowers

EFFECTSEFFECTSEFFECTSPesticide poisoningEFFECTSPesticide poisoningStress

EFFECTSPesticide poisoningStressBack pain, dermatitis

InterpretationEvaluación

ACTIONSDPSEEA FRAMEWORKDRIVING FORCESDRIVING FORCESGlobal markets (perfect roses)DRIVING FORCESGlobal markets (perfect roses) “Fair trade” – ethical commerce

PRESSURES

Global markets (perfect roses)Neo-liberalism

PRESSURES

(p )Neo-liberalismPoverty, MigrationPRESSURESNecessicity for pesticides / Spraying

Recognition of the FLP flower label program

Alternate technologies

STATE

Necessicity for pesticides / Spraying

STATELevel of pesticides in air & flowers

Necessicity for pesticides / SprayingLow salariesSTATELevel of pesticides in air & flowersSTATELevel of pesticides in air & flowers Better management

gLess toxic pesticides

Higher salaries (unions)

EXPOSURES

p

EXPOSURES

Work conditions; Child care; Money anxieties

EXPOSURES

Work conditions; ergonomicsChild care; Money anxieties

EXPOSURES Training & equipment

gof work processes

Inhalation of workplace airInhalation of workplace airIntensity of work; anxiety for kids

EFFECTS

Inhalation of workplace airIntensity of work; anxiety for kidsHandling/contact with flowers

EFFECTS

g q pMonitoring / surveillance

EFFECTSEFFECTSPesticide poisoningEFFECTSPesticide poisoningStress

EFFECTSPesticide poisoningStressBack pain, dermatitis

Timely diagnosis & treatment a Rotation of work & rehabilitation

InterpretationEvaluación

ACTIONSDIRECT IMPACTSDRIVING FORCES

CAPACITIES TO ACT

FORCES OF GLOBALIZATION (negative & positive)FLOR DRIVING FORCES on DRIVING FORCESRICU

DRIVING FORCESGlobal markets (perfect roses)Neo-liberalism Poverty, Migration

Recognition of the FLP flower label programRecognition of the FLP flower label program FAIR TRADE” – ETHICAL

COMMERCE RECOGNIZED (e.gGerman consumer support

Alternate technologiesLess toxic pesticides

Higher salaries (unions)

LTUR

PRESSURESNecessicity for pesticides / Spraying; Low salaries

STATE

on PRESSURESPressures on unions /demand for cleaner production

on STATERE

I

STATEPesticide Level in air & flowersWork conditions; ergonomicsChild care; Money anxieties

Better management of work processes Technical capacities to

oversee state of processes

on EXPOSURESN

EC

EXPOSURESInhalation of workplace airIntensity of work; anxiety for kidsHandling/contact with flowers

Training & equipmentMonitoring / surveillance

Monitoring capacity, worker committees

on EFFECTS

CUADO

EFFECTS

Stress

Timely diagnosis & treatment a Rotation of work & rehabilitation Occupational health servicesPESTICIDE POISONING

FLP PROGRAM

Interpretation

OR

CASE STUDY

StressBack pain, dermatitis

FLP PROGRAM

Conclusion• Consideration of global forces

(in an era of globalization)

– Enhances understanding

– Enhances capacity to develop/evaluate options

SUSTAINABLY MANAGING ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH RISKS SUSTAINABLY MANAGING ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH RISKS IN ECUADOR IN ECUADOR

A communityA community based intercultural and interdisciplinary initiativebased intercultural and interdisciplinary initiativeA communityA community--based, intercultural and interdisciplinary initiative based, intercultural and interdisciplinary initiative to promote human and ecosystem health. to promote human and ecosystem health.

UPCD TIER 1 UNIVERSITY PARTNERSHIP ($5 million, 6 years)

Climate change deforestation

Urbanization; disparity

ENVIRONMENT

AGENT HOSTAGENT HOST

Pathogenicity – e.g. dengue

International trade International travel

DENGUE

ENVIRONMENTENVIRONMENT

VECTORS

CLINICAL

EPIDEMIOLOGICALEPIDEMIOLOGICAL

LABORATORY

Transmission of Dengue Virus by Aedes aegypti

Site control leads to fewer

mosquitoes

Aedes aegyptiFumigation / Larviciding

kills

Mosquito enters ecosystem

kills mosquitoes

Mosquito feeds & acquires virus

Mosquito refeeds & transmits virus

ecosystem

Forced bedrest isolates viremia

Forced bedrest isolates viremia

Extrinsic incubation

period

Intrinsic incubation

period

isolates viremia from vector

isolates viremia from vector

period(~9 days)Viremia

0 5 8 12 16 20 24 28

period (~8 days) Viremia

IllnessDays

0 5 8 12 16 20 24 28

Human #1 Human #2

Illness

Driving Force ActionsDriving ForceUrbanization; Poverty,

climate

Pressure Housing conditions

Improved housing & infrastructurePressure Housing conditions

water handling practiceCommunity empowerment

StatePresence of containers with

water Environmental controls

Environmental surveillance

Exposure

Aedes Aegypti foci

water, Entomological surveillance

EffectDengue; DHF

Clinical-Epidemiological surveillance

g ;Interpretation

Evaluation

Integrated surveillance componentsg p

i t l ill id tifi ti f i k ithi• environmental surveillance - identification of risks within each of the 5 Popular Councils of Central Havana

t l i l ill i ill i h• entomological surveillance –active surveillance in the areas of infestation and appearance of epidemic foci;

• epidemiological / clinical surveillance - collecting and analyzing information on the individuals at risk, probable or confirmed cases, and serological surveillance; and

• community participation “surveillance” - monitoring community capacity and the extent of community participation in the implementation of the strategyparticipation in the implementation of the strategy.

Applying the eco-health approach• When and how to intervene effectively?• Active involvementActive involvement

– decision-makers; community; interdisciplinary

SURVEILLANCE

EnvironmentalSurveillance Entomological

surveillance

Clinical epidemiological

surveillancesurveillance

Social ParticipationParticipation

Applying the eco-health approach i C bin Cuba

Active involvement of decision-makers -community; interdisciplinary

SURVEILLANCE

EnvironmentalSurveillance

Entomologicalsurveillance

Clinical epidemiological

surveillance

Social Participation

Surveillance SystemSurveillance System4 subsystems:

EnvironmentalEnvironmentalEntomologicalClinical-Epidemiological and LaboratoryCommunity Participationy p

Events or conditions to monitor.Work and operation of the systemWork and operation of the system.Information flow and analysis• events to monitor, information sources, frequency of the, , q y

analysis and statisticalMapping the flow of the informationDissemination and feedback of the informationDissemination and feedback of the informationEvaluation of the surveillance system.

DecisionMaking

MINSAPPROVINCIAMUNICIPIO INFORMATION

System sustainabilityEpidemiological alertsMosquito Control Contingency Plan

INTER-RELATIONSHIP OF SUBSYSTEMS

-----------------------------------------------------------------

ClinicalEpidemiology

Contingency Plan

InformationA l i

PREVENTION SOC

-----------------------------------------------------------------

p gyLaboratory

Surveillancesubsystem

AnalysisRisk factor indicatorsCIAL

P

Action

EntomologicSurveillancesubsystem

Information PREVENTION

Risk factor indicators

PARTIC

Analysis

INFOR

-----------------------------------------------------------------

EnvironmentS illRi k f t i di t

Action

Information PREVENTION

IPATIO

Analysis

RMATIO

-----------------------------------------------------------------

Surveillancesubsystem

•Organos PPI f ti

Risk factor indicators ON

y

Action

N

•Organos PP• Organismos

•Consejo Popular

•Comunidad•FamiliaMedia

AcciónInformation:•Macro factors•Micro factors

ECOSYSTEMCommunity

Analysis

Indicators

(UMHE)

Integrated surveillance system for prevention of dengue at the local level

(UMHE)Chief of

Integrated environmtlhygiene program

Municipal hygiene and epidemiology unit (UMHE)

(biologist)Health Area

(Polyclínic) Direction Council

Hygiene Vice director

(biologist)

technical staff

(UMHE)

of hygiene for the health

area Collective analysisGBT*

Supervisor of health area

por GBT*

Chief of BrigadeCouncil of Popular Power

Field workkerGrupos

vecinalesNeighborhood

delegateCMF

DENGUE HOUSEHOLD INSPECTOR & SUPERVISOR WORKSHOPS

NEW INDICATORS INFORMATION SYSTEMS & REPORTINGNEW INDICATORS, INFORMATION SYSTEMS & REPORTING

Surveillance System Monitoring Gráfico 1. Ambiente intradomiciliario por Consejos Populares

90%

100%

Status of Household35,1

86,9

51,6

12,631,4

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

%

Status of Household Environments by Neighbourhood

33,5

4,7

35,8

8,4

0%

10%

20%

Dragones Los Sitios Cayo Hueso

Ciclos

Malas condiciones Condiciones regulares Condiciones adecuadas

Grafico 2. Ambiente Extradomiciliario por Consejo Popular.

Municipio Centro Habana

90%100%

% St t f O t id61.3

9.2 8.11

38.71 91.9990.8

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%

Dragones Los Sitios Cayo Hueso

% Status of Outside Environments by Neighbourhood

ciclos

malas condiciones condiciones adecuadas

Trend analysisGráfico 9. Ambiente intradomiciliario por ciclos en los tres

Consejos Populares

70 0

80,0

Household conditions by

30,0

40,0

50,0

60,0

70,0

%

Dragones

Los Sitios

Cayo Hueso

Household conditions by Neighbourhood

0,0

10,0

20,0

74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 86 87 88 89 90

Ciclos

Gráfico 7. Comportamiento de los focos de Aa por ciclo. Municipio Centro Habana

20

4060 Focos Overall levels of mosquito

breeding site activity

020

72 74 76 78 80 86 89ciclos

Integrating the risk mapping

Identification of “hot spots”Identification of hot spots


Recommended