Date post: | 20-Jul-2015 |
Category: |
Health & Medicine |
Upload: | natacha-santos |
View: | 37 times |
Download: | 1 times |
We confirmed sensi-za-on to nsLTP, thermally stable and resistant to pep-c diges-on panallergens present in apple and peach peel.
Although peach is the most frequently implicated fruit in Rosaceae anaphylaxis, both pa-ents had a more severe reac-on to apple.
We hypothesize this may be due to an increased content of Mal d 3 in both apple species consumed, or by cofactors that might
amplify an anaphylac-c episode as fas-ng and exercise.
Natacha Santos, Ângela Gaspar, Graça Pires, Mário Morais-‐Almeida Immunoallergy Department, CUF Descobertas Hospital, Lisbon, Portugal
Rosaceae fruits are an important cause of food allergy in
the Southern Europe.
Peach is the most implied Rosaceae in anaphylaxis
reports.
We describe 2 less usual case reports of anaphylaxis to apple:
§ 29 year-‐old woman
§ Allergic rhinoconjunc-vi-s and asthma, sensi-zed to grass and
parietaria pollen, mites and cat
§ Immediate anaphylac(c reac(on (generalized ur-caria and
shortness of breath) aTer ea-ng an unpeeled Granny smith
apple, and aTer a fas(ng period. Treated with oral an--‐histamine
and cor-costeroid and inhaled bronchodilator, the reac-on was
surpassed in one hour.
§ ATerward, she reported two episodes of labial angioedema aTer
inges-on of peach fruit and juice.
§ 18 year-‐old male
§ Allergic rhini-s and asthma, sensi-zed to grass and cypress pollen and
to mites
§ Immediate anaphylac(c reac(on (generalized pruritus, lips, hands and
feet angioedema and shortness of breath) aTer ea-ng an unpeeled
Golden delicious apple during a football game. Treated in the
emergency with i.m. an--‐histamine, i.v. cor-costeroid, inhaled
bronchodilator and oxygen therapy, with full recovery in three hours.
§ He referred one previous episode of facial angioedema aTer drinking
peach juice. Fig. 1 – Results of the prick tests with Bial-‐Aristegui® extracts (PT), prick to prick with the fresh food (PPT) and specific IgE (sIgE)
Fig. 2 – Results of the ImmunoCAP ISAC® (Phadia) for non specific Lipid Transfer Proteins (nsLTP)
PT (mm) PPT (mm) sIgE (kU/L)
apple (peel) 3x3 7x6 0.48 (pulp) -‐ -‐
peach (peel) 5x4 14x6 0.51 (pulp) -‐ -‐
plum (peel) -‐ -‐ -‐ (pulp)
pear (peel) -‐ -‐ -‐ (pulp)
chery (peel) -‐ -‐ -‐ (pulp) almond -‐ n.t. -‐ strawberry -‐ -‐ -‐ rPru p 3 0.69
PT (mm) PPT (mm) sIgE (kU/L)
apple (peel) 3x3 4x3 10.3
(pulp) -‐ -‐
peach (peel) 11x7 n.t 13.2
(pulp) 4x3
plum (peel) 3x3 n.t 8.36 (pulp)
pear (peel) -‐ 5x3
5.33 (pulp) -‐
chery (peel) 3x3 n.t 8.0 (pulp)
almond 3x3 n.t. 0.66 strawberry -‐ 10x4 1.18 rPru p 3 8.3
In rela-on to this presenta-on, I declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
n.t. – not tested Peach Parietaria
Peach Hazelnut