+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Why Geologic Storage Can Not Solve The High-Level Radioactive Waste Problem

Why Geologic Storage Can Not Solve The High-Level Radioactive Waste Problem

Date post: 02-Feb-2016
Category:
Upload: lucky
View: 21 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Why Geologic Storage Can Not Solve The High-Level Radioactive Waste Problem. by Dr. Gordon Edwards, President, CCNR, Canadian Coalition for Nuclear Responsibility www.ccnr.org [email protected] (514) 839 7214. IRRADIATED NUCLEAR FUEL ACCUMULATION WITHOUT GEOLOGIC DISPOSAL. HELLO ROBERT. ONE - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
21
Why Geologic Storage Can Not Solve The High-Level Radioactive Waste Problem by Dr. Gordon Edwards, President, CCNR, Canadian Coalition for Nuclear Responsibility www.ccnr.org [email protected] (514) 839 7214
Transcript
Page 1: Why Geologic Storage Can Not Solve The High-Level Radioactive Waste Problem

Why Geologic Storage

Can Not Solve The

High-Level Radioactive

Waste Problem

by Dr. Gordon Edwards, President, CCNR,Canadian Coalition for Nuclear Responsibilitywww.ccnr.org [email protected]

(514) 839 7214

Page 2: Why Geologic Storage Can Not Solve The High-Level Radioactive Waste Problem

HELLO ROBERT

HELLO ROBERT

HELLO ROBERT

HELLO ROBERT

HELLO ROBERT

IRRADIATED NUCLEAR FUEL ACCUMULATION

WITHOUT GEOLOGIC DISPOSAL

AFTER 2 YEARS

ONE REACTOR

Each dot represents one year’s production of nuclear waste

Page 3: Why Geologic Storage Can Not Solve The High-Level Radioactive Waste Problem

HELLO ROBERT

HELLO ROBERT

HELLO ROBERT

HELLO ROBERT

HELLO ROBERT

HELLO ROBERT

IRRADIATED NUCLEAR FUEL ACCUMULATION

WITHOUT GEOLOGIC DISPOSAL

AFTER 4 YEARS

Page 4: Why Geologic Storage Can Not Solve The High-Level Radioactive Waste Problem

HELLO ROBERT

HELLO ROBERT

HELLO ROBERT

IRRADIATED NUCLEAR FUEL ACCUMULATION

WITHOUT GEOLOGIC DISPOSAL

AFTER 8 YEARS

For the first 10 years, irradiated fuel is too hot to move.It must be stored on site and cooled in pools with circulating water.

Page 5: Why Geologic Storage Can Not Solve The High-Level Radioactive Waste Problem

HELLO ROBERT

HELLO ROBERT

HELLO ROBERT

HELLO ROBERT

HELLO ROBERT

IRRADIATED NUCLEAR FUEL ACCUMULATION

WITHOUT GEOLOGIC DISPOSAL

AFTER 16 YEARS

The changing colour indicates reduced radioactivity & heat output.

Page 6: Why Geologic Storage Can Not Solve The High-Level Radioactive Waste Problem

HELLO ROBERT

HELLO ROBERT

HELLO ROBERT

HELLO ROBERT

HELLO ROBERT

IRRADIATED NUCLEAR FUEL ACCUMULATION

WITHOUT GEOLOGIC DISPOSAL

AFTER 32 YEARS

The older irradiated fuel can be moved into dry storage containers.

Page 7: Why Geologic Storage Can Not Solve The High-Level Radioactive Waste Problem

HELLO ROBERT

HELLO ROBERT

HELLO ROBERT

HELLO ROBERT

HELLO ROBERT

IRRADIATED NUCLEAR FUEL ACCUMULATION

WITHOUT GEOLOGIC DISPOSAL

AFTER 40 YEARS

But having all this radioactive waste on the surface is a hazard.We need to find an acceptable solution to eliminate the risk . . . .

Page 8: Why Geologic Storage Can Not Solve The High-Level Radioactive Waste Problem

HELLO ROBERT

HELLO ROBERT

HELLO ROBERT

HELLO ROBERT

HELLO ROBERT

HELLO ROBERT

AND NOW . . .

WITH GEOLOGIC DISPOSAL

According to the nuclear industry and the Harper governmentthe solution is at hand: it is Deep Geologic Storage

Page 9: Why Geologic Storage Can Not Solve The High-Level Radioactive Waste Problem

HELLO ROBERT

HELLO ROBERT

HELLO ROBERT

HELLO ROBERT

HELLO ROBERT

HELLO ROBERT

AND NOW . . .

WITH GEOLOGIC DISPOSAL

AFTER 2 YEARS

But for the first 10 years irradiated fuel is too hot.It cannot be moved away from the reactor site.

Page 10: Why Geologic Storage Can Not Solve The High-Level Radioactive Waste Problem

HELLO ROBERT

HELLO ROBERT

HELLO ROBERT

HELLO ROBERT

HELLO ROBERT

HELLO ROBERT

WITH GEOLOGIC DISPOSAL

AFTER 4 YEARS

So the most radioactive and hottest fuel cannot be moved.

Page 11: Why Geologic Storage Can Not Solve The High-Level Radioactive Waste Problem

HELLO ROBERT

HELLO ROBERT

HELLO ROBERT

AFTER 8 YEARS

WITH GEOLOGIC DISPOSAL

As long as the reactor keeps operating, the problem remains.

Page 12: Why Geologic Storage Can Not Solve The High-Level Radioactive Waste Problem

HELLO ROBERT

HELLO ROBERT

HELLO ROBERT

HELLO ROBERT

HELLO ROBERT

WITH GEOLOGIC DISPOSAL

AFTER 16 YEARS

Irradiated fuel continues to accumulate at the reactor site.

Page 13: Why Geologic Storage Can Not Solve The High-Level Radioactive Waste Problem

HELLO ROBERT

.

WITH GEOLOGIC DISPOSAL

THIS PORTION IS BURIED -- HOORAY !AFTER 16 YEARS

Only the older, less radioactive, less volatile wastes can be buried.

Page 14: Why Geologic Storage Can Not Solve The High-Level Radioactive Waste Problem

HELLO ROBERT

.

WITH GEOLOGIC DISPOSAL

AFTER 32 YEARS

In fact, over 90 % of the total radioactive inventory is in the first ten year’s worth of irradiated fuel. So less than 10 % is buried.

> 90 % < 10 %

Page 15: Why Geologic Storage Can Not Solve The High-Level Radioactive Waste Problem

HELLO ROBERT

.

WITH GEOLOGIC DISPOSAL

AFTER 40 YEARS

Conclusion: The Catastrophe Potential at the Surface Still Remains(Unless the reactor is shut down for 10 years and all the waste is buried)

> 90 % < 10 %

Page 16: Why Geologic Storage Can Not Solve The High-Level Radioactive Waste Problem

HELLO ROBERT

HELLO ROBERT

HELLO ROBERT

HELLO ROBERT

.

WITH GEOLOGIC DISPOSAL

“TIME FOR A NUCLEAR RENAISSANCE ! MORE REACTORS, PLEASE !”

But the nuclear industry doesn’t want to shut reactors down.It wants to build more. With 2 reactors, the problem is doubled.

> 90 % < 10 %

Page 17: Why Geologic Storage Can Not Solve The High-Level Radioactive Waste Problem

HELLO ROBERT

HELLO ROBERT

.

.

.

.

.

WITH GEOLOGIC DISPOSAL

WITH 4 REACTORS

With 4 reactors, the unburied radioactivity is more than 3.5 timesthe radioactivity produced by one reactor without any burial at all!

> 90 % < 10 %

Page 18: Why Geologic Storage Can Not Solve The High-Level Radioactive Waste Problem

.

.

.

.

..

.

.

WITH GEOLOGIC DISPOSAL

WITH 6 REACTORS

> 90 % < 10 %

Page 19: Why Geologic Storage Can Not Solve The High-Level Radioactive Waste Problem

.

.

.

.

..

.

.

.

.

.

WITH GEOLOGIC DISPOSAL

WITH 8 REACTORS

> 90 % < 10 %

Page 20: Why Geologic Storage Can Not Solve The High-Level Radioactive Waste Problem

.

.

.

.

..

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

WITH GEOLOGIC DISPOSAL

So: WE HAVE AN EVER- GROWING INVENTORY OF UNBURIED WASTE!

> 90 % < 10 %

Page 21: Why Geologic Storage Can Not Solve The High-Level Radioactive Waste Problem

Geologic Storage

CAN NOT Solve The

High-Level Radioactive

Waste Problem . . .

. . . unless there is a complete phaseout of nuclear power

The Moral of the Story is:


Recommended