+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Why New Ventures Fail How many fail?* – 20% within one year – 66% within 7 years Why? –...

Why New Ventures Fail How many fail?* – 20% within one year – 66% within 7 years Why? –...

Date post: 27-Dec-2015
Category:
Upload: linette-bishop
View: 212 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
34
Why New Ventures Fail How many fail?* 20% within one year 66% within 7 years • Why? Exaggerated sense of optimism Vacillation over funding options Who or what is to blame? * Chiganti and Chiganti, Proceedings of the Small Business Institute, 2008
Transcript
Page 1: Why New Ventures Fail How many fail?* – 20% within one year – 66% within 7 years Why? – Exaggerated sense of optimism – Vacillation over funding options.

Why New Ventures Fail

• How many fail?* – 20% within one year– 66% within 7 years

• Why? – Exaggerated sense of optimism– Vacillation over funding options

• Who or what is to blame?

* Chiganti and Chiganti, Proceedings of the Small Business Institute, 2008

Page 2: Why New Ventures Fail How many fail?* – 20% within one year – 66% within 7 years Why? – Exaggerated sense of optimism – Vacillation over funding options.

Why CEOs Fail

“More than any other way, by failure to put the right people in the right jobs – and the related failure to fix people problems in time.”

– Ram Charon & Geoffrey Colvin, Fortune magazine 6/21/99

Page 3: Why New Ventures Fail How many fail?* – 20% within one year – 66% within 7 years Why? – Exaggerated sense of optimism – Vacillation over funding options.

What about the Team?

• CEO’s bet their vision on the team

• VC’s bet their funding on the team

• What are they really betting on?

Page 4: Why New Ventures Fail How many fail?* – 20% within one year – 66% within 7 years Why? – Exaggerated sense of optimism – Vacillation over funding options.

What do you really know?

• Personality (how applicable?)• Knowledge/Skill (how well performed?)• Previous experience (how relevant?)• Resume (how accurate?)• Recommendations (how biased?)• Interviews (how objective?)

VCs & entrepreneurs demand a new way to know who will contribute productively, and who won’t

Page 5: Why New Ventures Fail How many fail?* – 20% within one year – 66% within 7 years Why? – Exaggerated sense of optimism – Vacillation over funding options.

Assessment Origins - Who did what?

1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2010

From Intellect, to Personality, to Behavior

Behavior

Woodworth (U.S. Army)

Stanford-Binet IQ

Cattell 16PF

Personality

TGI Role-Based

Assessment

Gerber Mosaic Figures

Personality

Intellect

Performance

Components

Raw Material

Rorschach Lowenfield Mosaic

Gerber-PresserExec. Behavior

Gerber-PresserEnhanced EBA

Caliper

Myers-Briggs

Binet-Simon

IQU.S. Army

Alpha-Beta

Wechsler WAIS

AllportValues

Hartman Axiology/EQ

MMPI Patholog

y

5-FactorTheory

DiSC

Predictive Index

Page 6: Why New Ventures Fail How many fail?* – 20% within one year – 66% within 7 years Why? – Exaggerated sense of optimism – Vacillation over funding options.

What you measure is what you get.

What you measure is what you get.

Page 7: Why New Ventures Fail How many fail?* – 20% within one year – 66% within 7 years Why? – Exaggerated sense of optimism – Vacillation over funding options.

What is Role-Based Assessment™?

• Both Theory and Method focus on the way a person will tend to work in a group (their Role), rather than on his/her individual characteristics

• Roles do predict how people will behave: collaboration, motivation and engagement

• Role-Based Assessment is very different from other assessments

Page 8: Why New Ventures Fail How many fail?* – 20% within one year – 66% within 7 years Why? – Exaggerated sense of optimism – Vacillation over funding options.

RBA Measures Coherence

• A Coherent person has a well-developed sense of self and others; seeks to contribute• A Rigid person is self-involved; is motivated to self-protect by dominating/manipulating others• A Diffuse person is self-involved; is motivated to self-protect by misdirecting attention

Coherent RigidDiffuse

Page 9: Why New Ventures Fail How many fail?* – 20% within one year – 66% within 7 years Why? – Exaggerated sense of optimism – Vacillation over funding options.

Roles are not Jobs

• Your Role is not your Personality; very different kinds of people may have the same Role

• Roles serve the group’s universal needs:

– Envisioning (or inventing) the future

– Turning ‘the Vision’ into strategies and plans

– Overseeing and guiding the group

– Making detailed schedules and assignments

– Following plans and getting things done quickly

Page 10: Why New Ventures Fail How many fail?* – 20% within one year – 66% within 7 years Why? – Exaggerated sense of optimism – Vacillation over funding options.

Roles are not Jobs

• Roles serve the group’s universal needs:– Creating and building ‘community’ (team spirit)– Identifying and solving tough problems– Preserving/providing knowledge and group history– Tending to the needs of others– Searching for new possibilities, resources, and

information

Most people have a distinct preference or drive to fulfill one of these needs. That's their Role.

Page 11: Why New Ventures Fail How many fail?* – 20% within one year – 66% within 7 years Why? – Exaggerated sense of optimism – Vacillation over funding options.

Roles are not Jobs

• Envisioning the future - - - - - - - - - - - -• From Vision to Strategy - - - - - - - - - -• Big-picture Guidance - - - - - - - - - - -• Getting it done! - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -• Planning, scheduling, tracking - - - - • Creating ‘community’- - - - - - - - - - - • Solving thorny problems - - - - - - - - - • Preserving knowledge - - - - - - - - - - • Tending to immediate needs - - - - -• Searching for ‘treasure’ - - - - - - - - - -

> Founder> Vision Mover> Vision Former> Action Mover> Action Former> Communicator> Conductor> Curator> Watchdog> Explorer

Some Roles are a natural ‘fit’ to specific kinds of jobs

Page 12: Why New Ventures Fail How many fail?* – 20% within one year – 66% within 7 years Why? – Exaggerated sense of optimism – Vacillation over funding options.

How Bad Hires Happen

HIRED!

Finalist Candidates

Career Path

References

Knowledge/Skill

Resume

Interviews

Personality

1 2 3

Page 13: Why New Ventures Fail How many fail?* – 20% within one year – 66% within 7 years Why? – Exaggerated sense of optimism – Vacillation over funding options.

How Bad Hires Happen

Uh-oh!Put first things first: Coherence, Role-fit, Teaming!

Finalist Candidates

Career Path

References

Knowledge/Skill

Resume

Interviews

Personality

Role-Based Assessment

1 2 3Rigid; wrong Role; teaming = poor

Coherent; right Role; teaming = excellent

Coherent; wrong Role; teaming = fair

?

Page 14: Why New Ventures Fail How many fail?* – 20% within one year – 66% within 7 years Why? – Exaggerated sense of optimism – Vacillation over funding options.

Candidate #1: Operations Manager

• She has little interest in finding or fixing other people's problems or of actually doing things that other people want her to do.

• She has little interest in organizational tasks, which is going to keep her disorganized in both her approach and her work.

• In general, this candidate is so burdened with problems that she is likely to be a high maintenance employee.

From the actual RBA report of Candidate #1.If you had known, would you have hired her?

Page 15: Why New Ventures Fail How many fail?* – 20% within one year – 66% within 7 years Why? – Exaggerated sense of optimism – Vacillation over funding options.

Select from the Best of the Best

HIRED!RBA screening adds value to other assessment methods!

Finalist Candidates

Career Path

References

Knowledge/Skill

Resume

Interviews

Personality

Role-Based Assessment

4 5 6Coherent; right Role; teaming = excellent

Coherent; right Role; teaming = excellent

Coherent; right Role; teaming = excellent

Page 16: Why New Ventures Fail How many fail?* – 20% within one year – 66% within 7 years Why? – Exaggerated sense of optimism – Vacillation over funding options.

Candidate #6: Administrative Support

• This candidate is the type of support person who can be found in the front of the group with marker in hand, developing a list of things that need to be done or important points or project benchmarks.

• He is the consummate organizer. The key is that he does not organize for the present but as a way of getting things ready for the future. His style is one of handling many things simultaneously.

Key information in plain English, identifying strong performers and future leaders

Page 17: Why New Ventures Fail How many fail?* – 20% within one year – 66% within 7 years Why? – Exaggerated sense of optimism – Vacillation over funding options.

The Team Starts with the Founder

First on your timeline Has the Vision and writes the paper - not

a statement – before the business plan Gets people to want to be part of it Keeps one eye inside and the other

outside, connects the organization with the world

Page 18: Why New Ventures Fail How many fail?* – 20% within one year – 66% within 7 years Why? – Exaggerated sense of optimism – Vacillation over funding options.

Vision balanced by Grounding

Vision Mover Vision Former

Page 19: Why New Ventures Fail How many fail?* – 20% within one year – 66% within 7 years Why? – Exaggerated sense of optimism – Vacillation over funding options.

Drive balanced by Organization

Action Mover Action Former

Page 20: Why New Ventures Fail How many fail?* – 20% within one year – 66% within 7 years Why? – Exaggerated sense of optimism – Vacillation over funding options.

Obtain and Provide the Essentials

Explorer Watchdog

Page 21: Why New Ventures Fail How many fail?* – 20% within one year – 66% within 7 years Why? – Exaggerated sense of optimism – Vacillation over funding options.

Create Community, Culture, and Coordination

Communicator

Page 22: Why New Ventures Fail How many fail?* – 20% within one year – 66% within 7 years Why? – Exaggerated sense of optimism – Vacillation over funding options.

Fix Problems, Bank the Solutions

Conductor Curator

Page 23: Why New Ventures Fail How many fail?* – 20% within one year – 66% within 7 years Why? – Exaggerated sense of optimism – Vacillation over funding options.

Finding & Keeping Good People

• Effective people are ‘Coherent’; use Role-Based Assessment to identify and develop them

• Align Roles to job responsibilities to strengthen team performance

• Give people goals that require constructive and challenging interaction, and reward them as a team

People don’t leave companies, they leave managers!

Page 24: Why New Ventures Fail How many fail?* – 20% within one year – 66% within 7 years Why? – Exaggerated sense of optimism – Vacillation over funding options.

What Diffuse Managers Do…

At Best: Inconsistent, Unpredictable Performance

Plans

Confuse & Frustrate

Rewards

Objectives

Goals

Create Rivalry & Conflict

Achievement

Engagement

Vision

Blame & Victimize

Misdirect & Deprive

Synergy

Schedules

Page 25: Why New Ventures Fail How many fail?* – 20% within one year – 66% within 7 years Why? – Exaggerated sense of optimism – Vacillation over funding options.

What Rigid Managers Do…

DiscourageDemean

Page 26: Why New Ventures Fail How many fail?* – 20% within one year – 66% within 7 years Why? – Exaggerated sense of optimism – Vacillation over funding options.

What Rigid Managers Do…

MicromanageManipulate

DiscourageDemean

Page 27: Why New Ventures Fail How many fail?* – 20% within one year – 66% within 7 years Why? – Exaggerated sense of optimism – Vacillation over funding options.

What Rigid Managers Do…

Micromanage

Inhibit or Compartmentalize Team Synergy

Manipulate

DiscourageDemean

Page 28: Why New Ventures Fail How many fail?* – 20% within one year – 66% within 7 years Why? – Exaggerated sense of optimism – Vacillation over funding options.

What Rigid Managers Do…

At best: High Performance -- but at High Cost

Micromanage

Inhibit or Compartmentalize Team Synergy

Manipulate

DiscourageDemean

Page 29: Why New Ventures Fail How many fail?* – 20% within one year – 66% within 7 years Why? – Exaggerated sense of optimism – Vacillation over funding options.

What Coherent Managers Do…EmpowerOrganize

RespectAcknowledge

Lead,

Inspire,

Engage, Integrate,

Motivate

Page 30: Why New Ventures Fail How many fail?* – 20% within one year – 66% within 7 years Why? – Exaggerated sense of optimism – Vacillation over funding options.

What Coherent Managers Do…

At Best: Build Teams, Resolve Problems, Improve Productivity, Exceed Expectations

EmpowerOrganize

RespectAcknowledge

Lead,

Inspire,

Engage, Integrate,

Motivate

Page 31: Why New Ventures Fail How many fail?* – 20% within one year – 66% within 7 years Why? – Exaggerated sense of optimism – Vacillation over funding options.

Building a Coherent Human Infrastructure

• The keys to strategic intervention:– Analyzing teams– Role-fit, Coherence, and team

structure – Diagnosis and repair of

organizational performance problems

• CHI Indicators provide global metrics

What makes a great team great?

Page 32: Why New Ventures Fail How many fail?* – 20% within one year – 66% within 7 years Why? – Exaggerated sense of optimism – Vacillation over funding options.

You Can Do This Now

• Mine your current workforce for ‘hidden treasure’

• Create a Coherent workplace and improve performance across-the-board

• Develop Leaders and Teams• Get a simple, accurate, actionable agenda for

solving organizational problems

Page 33: Why New Ventures Fail How many fail?* – 20% within one year – 66% within 7 years Why? – Exaggerated sense of optimism – Vacillation over funding options.

DrJ’s Rules of Entrepreneurship

• You can’t do it alone• No one gets it right the first time, so don’t hesitate to re-

evaluate • Cash is king, but the team determines how effectively it will be

utilized• The marketplace rules, but you and your team can create and

control perceived value • What you do + how you do it = who you are

Make your workplace a place that works better!

Page 34: Why New Ventures Fail How many fail?* – 20% within one year – 66% within 7 years Why? – Exaggerated sense of optimism – Vacillation over funding options.

Dr. Janice Presser, CEO The Gabriel Institute

1515 Market Street, Suite 825Philadelphia, PA 19102

215-825-2500

[email protected] Dr. Janice Blog: http://drjanice.wordpress.com/

CEO2CEO Blog: http://ceo2ceo.wordpress.comTwitter: http://twitter.com/DrJanice

LinkedIn Group: www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=1855357


Recommended