+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Why Real-time Risk Decisions Require transaction Analytics · Education Cash Electronics...

Why Real-time Risk Decisions Require transaction Analytics · Education Cash Electronics...

Date post: 22-Sep-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 0 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
14
INSIGHTS » Why Real-Time Risk Decisions Require Transaction Analytics Reduce losses with sharper, faster risk prediction and action in customer management and collections The double shock of recession-spurred delinquencies and new regulatory inroads on profit is making creditors acutely aware of the need to make sharper risk distinctions among customers. In both account management and collections, they need precise insights to guide more targeted, timely actions. Every bank with transacting accounts has the potential to achieve this higher level of risk precision. The necessary deep insights into customer behavior can be drawn from credit card and debit card account transaction data. It’s the most consistent and frequently updated source of customer data. By using transaction analytics to analyze this data—and combining the results with the FICO® Score and behavior scores—banks more cleanly separate customers by risk level, especially in moderate risk bands and early lifecycle accounts. Sharper risk separation and real-time or frequent scoring enables banks to quickly and precisely target line changes and timing, and other treatments, to reduce losses and improve profitability. Better insight into risk also enables banks to focus collections resources in ways that reduce charge-offs. This white paper: Demonstrates how combining transaction scores with traditional behavior scores and FICO® Scores (credit bureau risk scores) increases accuracy of risk predictions Discusses the advantages of deploying transaction analytics in real-time mode to accelerate awareness of developing risk and enable early intervention to mitigate losses Presents results of three studies showing the increased predictive accuracy, segmentation granularity and monetary value gained by adding transaction scoring to current methods Number 29 —January 2010 www.fico.com Make every decision count TM FICO® Transaction Scores, generated with every transaction, can be used instantly by FICO® TRIAD® Customer Manager to make real-time decisions
Transcript
Page 1: Why Real-time Risk Decisions Require transaction Analytics · Education Cash Electronics Collectables Restaurant Entertainment Food Petrol Hobby Home Improvement Liquor Retail Travel

insights »

Why Real-time Risk Decisions Require transaction AnalyticsReduce losses with sharper, faster risk prediction and action in customer management and collections

The double shock of recession-spurred delinquencies and new regulatory inroads on profit is

making creditors acutely aware of the need to make sharper risk distinctions among customers.

In both account management and collections, they need precise insights to guide more targeted,

timely actions.

Every bank with transacting accounts has the potential to achieve this higher level of risk precision.

The necessary deep insights into customer behavior can be drawn from credit card and debit card

account transaction data. It’s the most consistent and frequently updated source of customer data.

By using transaction analytics to analyze this data—and combining the results

with the FICO® Score and behavior scores—banks more cleanly separate

customers by risk level, especially in moderate risk bands and early lifecycle

accounts. Sharper risk separation and real-time or frequent scoring enables

banks to quickly and precisely target line changes and timing, and other

treatments, to reduce losses and improve profitability. Better insight into risk

also enables banks to focus collections resources in ways that reduce charge-offs.

This white paper:

Demonstrates how combining transaction scores with traditional behavior scores and FICO® •

Scores (credit bureau risk scores) increases accuracy of risk predictions

Discusses the advantages of deploying transaction analytics in real-time mode to accelerate •

awareness of developing risk and enable early intervention to mitigate losses

Presents results of three studies showing the increased predictive accuracy, segmentation •

granularity and monetary value gained by adding transaction scoring to current methods

Number 29 —January 2010

www.fico.com Make every decision countTM

FICO® Transaction Scores, generated with every transaction, can be used instantly by FICO® TRIAD® Customer Manager to make real-time decisions

Page 2: Why Real-time Risk Decisions Require transaction Analytics · Education Cash Electronics Collectables Restaurant Entertainment Food Petrol Hobby Home Improvement Liquor Retail Travel

www.fico.com page 2

Why Real-Time Risk Decisions Require Transaction Analytics

insights »

“Transactions will become more important as demand for reduced latency in business intelligence and monitoring require more granular knowledge and timely tracking at the transaction level. Real-time intelligence will be needed in every FSI vertical and across every transaction type from retail deposits and savings to loans, investments, and payments.”

TowerGroup, July ‘09

While top banks have recently increased their use of transaction data, even industry leaders have

yet to realize its full potential for real-time detection of changing risk.

Transaction analytics detect changes in risk as they occur, and generate fresh scores with each

transaction. Yet most banks are processing the scores in batch mode, usually once a month. This

batch processing prevents promotion or intervention with clients at point-of-sale when early

signs of improving or deteriorating performance occur. In addition, many banks are using models

that capture only a portion of the insights that could be extracted from their transaction data.

The means to make sharper risk distinctions in real time

are available today. Banks can take advantage of better

modeling techniques as well as software that enables

deployed models to deliver accurate scores in the

milliseconds it takes for authorization of a credit card

purchase or an ATM withdrawal.

Transaction scoring is the key to making accurate real-

time risk decisions. As TowerGroup recently pointed out,

demand for reduced latency in business intelligence and

monitoring will require creditors to pull more insight from

their transactions.1

The combined use of traditional behavior scores and the FICO® Score to achieve a more accurate

assessment of customer risk has been standard industry practice for many years. The predictive

models that generate these scores analyze different data sources and, consequently, provide

different risk perspectives. Using both perspectives to make customer decisions lifts results above

what can be achieved using either score in isolation.

Transaction analytics lift performance even further because they model an additional rich source

of data and provide an additional risk perspective. Authorizations of credit and debit account

transactions contain abundant detail—the what, when and how much of customer spending—

from which patterns indicative of risk can be drawn.

Some of these patterns are evident in Figure 1, which shows percentage changes in credit card

authorization amounts from a six-month period in 2007–2008 to the same period a year later as

the recession set in.

Sharper Risk »Distinctions in Real Time

1 “Global IT Spending Forecast for Risk Management: A Growth Opportunity for Business and Technology,” TowerGroup, July 20, 2009, # V60:02BE

Increasing Decision »Accuracy and Speed

Page 3: Why Real-time Risk Decisions Require transaction Analytics · Education Cash Electronics Collectables Restaurant Entertainment Food Petrol Hobby Home Improvement Liquor Retail Travel

www.fico.com page 3

Why Real-Time Risk Decisions Require Transaction Analytics

insights » insights »

In this chart, we see changing spending patterns for all consumers (blue bars), perhaps as a result

of economic stress. But accounts that were seriously delinquent by the 2008–2009 period showed

much more pronounced changes (orange bars) during this period. These customers have changed

their spending as the economic cycle has changed, including higher levels of cash advances, and

reduced spending in travel and home improvement.

It’s the combination of spending behaviors that creates a pattern indicative of rising or falling risk,

and sometimes it’s the absence of activity that is most indicative. For example, as consumers become

more risky, their spending shifts away from categories such as home improvement and retail. Single-

event transactional triggers (e.g., the third cash advance in a month) miss these clues to changing risk.

Transaction analytics—models that capture the most indicative characteristics and relationships in

transaction data—detect such spending patterns. As a result, they’re able to separate accounts that

appear the same in cycle-end activity summaries but actually have different levels of risk.

The best models are very sophisticated and very specific. They analyze characteristics that go

beyond whether the consumer bought groceries or gasoline to, for example, where the consumer

bought groceries and what time of day or night the consumer bought gasoline. They capture

additional dimensions of time and space, such as velocity of cash advances and changes in elapsed time for various types of purchases.

–30%

–50%

–10%

10%

30%

70%

50%

90%

Figure 1: Revealing risk in customer spending patterns Percent change in credit card authorization amounts per accountOctober 2008–March 2009 compared to October 2007–March 2008

All AccountsBad Accounts

PERC

ENTA

GE

CHA

NG

E IN

AU

THO

RIZA

TIO

N A

MO

UN

TSPE

R A

CCO

UN

T

All Accounts 6.21 13.27 4.23 2.19 1.90 6.67 4.01 6.06 2.93 0.65 4.27 1.62 2.74 20.48

Bad Accounts 3.82 65.70 12.99 10.87 1.04 5.29 6.35 1.48 11.80 15.97 13.21 11.69 8.71 14.89

Books & Education Cash Electronics Collectables Restaurant Entertainment Food Petrol Hobby Home

Improvement Liquor Retail Travel Convenience Check

Page 4: Why Real-time Risk Decisions Require transaction Analytics · Education Cash Electronics Collectables Restaurant Entertainment Food Petrol Hobby Home Improvement Liquor Retail Travel

www.fico.com page 4

Why Real-Time Risk Decisions Require Transaction Analytics

insights » insights »

Because, as shown in Figure 2, transaction patterns are customer-specific, analytic models

must also be able to differentiate between patterns that are unusual for one customer but not for another. Making an ATM withdrawal at 11:30 pm may be a departure from one customer’s

normal spending pattern, and it may indicate a changing risk profile, while it is completely

ordinary for another customer, who works on a night shift.

The most important point to understand about today’s advanced transaction analytics is that

the kinds of risk patterns shown in Figures 1 and 2 are detected as they develop. Indeed, the

best models pick up patterns indicative of changing risk within a handful of transactions.

Because a fresh risk score can be generated with every transaction, it reflects spending patterns

drawn from behavior taking place a day before or even minutes before the current transaction.

Overall Risk Level

Date Time Merchant Degree Of Risk

May 01 4:00 pm

May 09 6:30 pm

May 09 7:15 pm

May 19 5:30 pm

May 27 11:30 am

May 31 12:00 pm

June 01 9:00 am

June 19 6:00 pm

June 19 7:00 pm

June 21 4:30 pm

July 03 5:00 pm

July 08 6:00 pm

July 27 3:00 pm

July 31 12:00 pm

Specialty Retail

Specialty Electronics

High-End Retail

Specialty Grocery

Discount Retail

Petrol

High-End Hotel

Children’s Toys

Specialty Retail

Specialty Retail

Specialty Retail

Petrol

High-End Retail

Fast Food

Date Time Merchant Degree Of Risk

May 01 4:00 pm

May 09 11:30 pm

May 09 7:15 pm

May 19 10:30 am

May 27 11:30 am

May 31 12:00 pm

June 01 9:00 pm

June 19 9:00 pm

June 19 7:00 pm

June 21 4:30 pm

July 03 5:00 am

July 08 6:00 pm

July 27 3:00 pm

July 31 12:00 pm

Specialty Retail

ATM / Cash

Liquor Store

Casino

Discount Retail

Petrol

Casino

Discount Retail

Specialty Retail

Fast Food

Petrol

ATM / Cash

High-End Retail

Fast Food

Overall Risk Level

Figure 2: Customer spending patterns may reveal risk

Customer #1 Spending Pattern Customer #2 Spending Pattern

Page 5: Why Real-time Risk Decisions Require transaction Analytics · Education Cash Electronics Collectables Restaurant Entertainment Food Petrol Hobby Home Improvement Liquor Retail Travel

www.fico.com page 5

Why Real-Time Risk Decisions Require Transaction Analytics

insights »

Figure 3 shows the potential advantage of real-time transaction scoring. Here we see one

account’s transaction scores, generated with each new transaction, as well as the behavior score

at the same point in time. The falling transaction score shows a significant change in risk, which

would otherwise not be picked up until cycle end when a new behavior score is generated.

Real-time transaction scoring, however, gives the bank the opportunity to stop transactions as

early as 11/15 as shown below—23 days before the end of the cycle.

FICO® Transaction Scores make such point-of-sale scoring and action practical and reliable.

Our patented profiling technique enables vast quantities of historical transaction data to be

brought to bear on the current transaction without the need to store and process a lengthy,

CPU-intensive data feed. The profiling technique, which captures individual customer spending

patterns, is dynamic. Account profiles are updated with every transaction. (For more information,

see the sidebar “FICO® Transaction Scores platform” on page 13.)

New FICO research demonstrates the added value of transaction analytics for reducing

losses. In the first two studies, combining a transaction score with a behavior score and FICO®

Score increases risk differentiation, enabling finer, more accurate segmentation in credit line

management and collections. In the third study, a transaction score used with a behavior score

accelerates creditor awareness of accounts showing signs of financial distress and enables timely

interventions to contain losses.

Research on Combined »Score Performance

FICO

® TRA

NSA

CTI

ON

SCO

REBEH

AVIOR SCO

RE

550

500

450

400

300

350

620

640

660

680

720

700

250

Figure 3: Timely alerts to changing risk

Transaction ScoreBehavior Score

11/10 11/12 11/14 11/16 11/18 11/20 11/22 11/24 11/26 11/28 11/30 12/2 12/4 12/6 12/8

Page 6: Why Real-time Risk Decisions Require transaction Analytics · Education Cash Electronics Collectables Restaurant Entertainment Food Petrol Hobby Home Improvement Liquor Retail Travel

www.fico.com page 6

Why Real-Time Risk Decisions Require Transaction Analytics

insights »

Sharper credit line decrease decisions

In the first data study, comprising of more than 10 million North American credit card accounts,

FICO examined the predictive lift from combined use of behavior scores, the FICO® Score and

FICO® Transaction Scores in credit line decrease decisions. The results demonstrate significant

improvement in risk discrimination and, in particular, markedly greater risk purity of end strategy

segments across current and mildly delinquent accounts.

For simplicity and brevity, the charts below show the impact of combined scoring on just one

slice of the accounts: those with behavior scores in the lowest-scoring 10% (decile 1). This high-risk

segment represents about 6% of the entire account population.

As shown in Figure 4, the aggregate bad rate for the accounts in this behavior score decile is 13.53%,

where “bad” is defined as accounts with a maximum delinquency of 3+ cycles, bankrupt or charged-

off in the subsequent six months.

Adding the FICO® Score refines the view of risk, enabling more granular segmentation. The five

resulting segments, based on 20% FICO® Score divisions (quintiles), have a bad rate ranging from 5%

to nearly 27%.

Figure 4: Increasing segmentation granularity for credit line decrease by adding scores

1 2 3 4 5 Total

1

2

3

4

5

Total

Behavior score decile 1 (lowest-scoring 10%)

FICO® Score quintiles (20% divisions)

35.90%

28.49%

24.76%

20.54%

14.52%

26.99%

26.99%

24.02%

17.03%

14.28%

11.15%

7.48%

15.52%

15.52%

19.02%

13.19%

10.83%

8.30%

5.24%

11.50%

11.50%

14.98%

9.85%

8.10%

6.13%

3.74%

8.29%

8.29%

10.80%

6.17%

5.37%

3.73%

2.33%

4.97%

4.97%

22.95%

15.94%

13.04%

9.44%

5.33%

13.53%

13.53%

FICO

® Tr

ansa

ctio

n Sc

ores

qu

inti

les

(20%

div

isio

ns)

13.53%

Behavior score + FICO® ScoreBad rates: 4.97% to 26.99%

Behavior score aloneBad rate: 13.53%

Behavior score + FICO® Score + transaction scoreBad rates: 2.33% to 35.90%

+

+

Page 7: Why Real-time Risk Decisions Require transaction Analytics · Education Cash Electronics Collectables Restaurant Entertainment Food Petrol Hobby Home Improvement Liquor Retail Travel

www.fico.com page 7

Why Real-Time Risk Decisions Require Transaction Analytics

insights »

Adding the transaction score further refines the view of risk, increasing segmentation granularity

even more. We break apart each of the FICO® Score quintiles into transaction score quintiles. This tri-

score approach expands the number and precision of risk-separated segments, with bad rates now

ranging from 2.33% bad rate to 35.90%.

This fine-grained segmentation enables the portfolio manager to assign credit line decreases with

much greater precision. Figure 5 shows a strategy diagram with segments receiving line decreases in

orange. Accounts receiving no decrease are in green.

In this diagram, we can see that:

When the behavior score and FICO® Score are used together, accounts falling in the lowest 60% of •

FICO® Scores (deciles 1–3) receive the decrease. These are represented by the three orange boxes

in the FICO® SCORE row of the diagram.

When the transaction score is used with the behavior score and FICO® Score, the greater precision •

in risk separation enables the strategy to be fine-tuned. With this added precision:

About 12% of accounts from the decrease population no longer receive the line decrease. •

These “swap outs” are represented by the green boxes at the bottom of the second and third

columns from the left (under the orange FICO® SCORE boxes labeled 15.52% and 11.50%).

About 8% of accounts not previously targeted for line decreases now receive them. These •

“swap ins” are represented by the two orange boxes at the top of the fourth and fifth columns

(under the blue FICO® SCORE boxes labeled 8.29% and 4.97%).

CURRENT ACCOUNTS

BEHAVIOR SCOREDECILE 1

BAD RATE: 13.53%

FICO® SCORE26.99%

TXN SCORE35.90%

TXN SCORE28.49%

TXN SCORE24.76%

TXN SCORE20.54%

TXN SCORE14.52%

TXN SCORE24.02%

TXN SCORE17.03%

TXN SCORE14.28%

TXN SCORE7.48%

TXN SCORE11.15%

TXN SCORE19.02%

TXN SCORE13.19%

TXN SCORE10.83%

TXN SCORE8.30%

TXN SCORE5.24%

TXN SCORE14.98%

TXN SCORE10.80%

TXN SCORE6.17%

TXN SCORE5.37%

TXN SCORE3.73%

TXN SCORE2.33%

TXN SCORE9.85%

TXN SCORE8.10%

TXN SCORE6.13%

TXN SCORE3.74%

FICO® SCORE15.52%

FICO® SCORE 11.50%

FICO® SCORE8.29%

FICO® SCORE4.97%

Increasing segmentation by adding FICO® Transaction Scores (TXN SCORE) to behavior score and FICO® Score

Credit line decrease

No credit line decrease

Figure 5: Strategy for credit line decrease

Page 8: Why Real-time Risk Decisions Require transaction Analytics · Education Cash Electronics Collectables Restaurant Entertainment Food Petrol Hobby Home Improvement Liquor Retail Travel

www.fico.com page 8

Why Real-Time Risk Decisions Require Transaction Analytics

insights »

Better segmentation of accounts for credit limit decreases and other loss-mitigation treatments can

have a significant financial impact, as shown in Figure 6.

Sharper collections treatment decisions

FICO also performed a study on the impact of transaction scoring on the segmentation of delinquent

accounts, using the same 10 million North American credit card accounts as the previous study.

For simplicity and brevity, the charts below show the impact of combined scoring on just one slice

of the accounts: one-cycle delinquent accounts in the middle-scoring 10% (decile 5) of behavior

scores. The study demonstrated particular benefit in moderate score ranges such as this—those

traditional “gray areas” of risk, where portfolio managers may have the least confidence in applying

treatment to accounts.

Figure 6: Estimating the benefit of sharper credit line decrease decisions

Portfolio size 1 million accounts

Lift scenarios (% of accounts swapped-in for line decrease)

Monthly prevented bad $

Annual prevented bad $

Annual benefit per total account

Average bad rate of swap-in population

Average decrease amount per account

Utilization of incremental credit line

Monthly accounts subject to credit line decreases

Conservative: 10% Average: 15% Optimistic: 20%

$39,000

$468,000

$0.47

80%

13%

$750

5,000

$58,500

$702,000

$0.70

$78,000

$936,000

$0.94

Current accounts 900,000 (90%)

Sharper segmentation enables you to prevent losses by avoiding balance build on riskier accounts. The chart below shows representative results in three estimated lift scenarios. The actual benefit you gain will depend on how effective your current segmentation scheme is, as well as your specific policies around credit limit decreases.

It is important to note that these estimates show only one side of the benefit to be gained from more accurate credit limit decrease decisions. In addition to helping with loss mitigation, sharper segmentation also improves profitability. By identifying less risky accounts that can be removed from credit line decrease populations, it prevents unnecessary constraints on account usage and avoids causing dissatisfaction that can lead to the attrition of valuable customers.

Page 9: Why Real-time Risk Decisions Require transaction Analytics · Education Cash Electronics Collectables Restaurant Entertainment Food Petrol Hobby Home Improvement Liquor Retail Travel

www.fico.com page 9

Why Real-Time Risk Decisions Require Transaction Analytics

insights »

As shown in Figure 7, the aggregate bad rate for the accounts in this behavior score decile is 23%,

where “bad” is defined as accounts with a maximum delinquency of 3+ cycles, bankrupt or charged-

off in the subsequent six months.

Adding the FICO® Score refines the view of risk, enabling more granular segmentation. The five

resulting segments, based on 20% FICO® Score divisions (quintiles), have a bad rate ranging from

13% to nearly 41%.

Adding the transaction score further refines the view of risk, increasing segmentation granularity. We

break apart each of the FICO® Score quintiles into transaction score quintiles. This tri-score approach

expands the number and precision of risk-separated segments, with bad rates now ranging from 5%

bad rate to 51%.

Figure 7: Increasing segmentation granularity in one-cycle delinquent accounts

1 2 3 4 5 Total

1

2

3

4

5

Total

Behavior score decile 5 (mid-range 10%) score decile 1 (lowest-scoring 10%)

FICO® Score quintiles (20% divisions)

51.15%

41.62%

39.16%

31.66%

24.85%

40.50%

40.50%

36.96%

28.85%

25.01%

20.03%

13.29%

25.77%

25.77%

30.51%

24.06%

21.54%

16.04%

10.44%

20.81%

20.81%

27.32%

19.60%

16.69%

13.64%

9.03%

17.23%

17.23%

23.07%

16.38%

13.03%

10.23%

5.03%

13.14%

13.14%

35.22%

26.58%

23.32%

17.51%

10.79%

23.32%

23.32%

FICO

® Tr

ansa

ctio

n Sc

ores

qu

inti

les

(20%

div

isio

ns)

23.32%

Behavior score + FICO® ScoreBad rates: 13.14% to 40.50%

Behavior score aloneBad rate: 23.32%

Behavior score + FICO® Score + transaction scoreBad rates: 5.03% to 51.15%

+

+

Page 10: Why Real-time Risk Decisions Require transaction Analytics · Education Cash Electronics Collectables Restaurant Entertainment Food Petrol Hobby Home Improvement Liquor Retail Travel

www.fico.com page 10

Why Real-Time Risk Decisions Require Transaction Analytics

insights »

This sharper segmentation enables collections managers to make better decisions about where

to focus resources. Figure 8 shows various tiers of collections effort, with the highest one-cycle

collection priority in red and the lowest priority in blue.

The diagram and Distribution of Accounts table below it show that:

When the behavior score and FICO® Score are used together, the increased separation results in •

20% of accounts receiving high-priority collections treatment, 40% receiving moderate-priority

treatment and another 40% receiving low-priority treatment.

When the behavior score, FICO® Score and transaction score are all used, the greater precision in •

risk separation enables the strategy to be fine-tuned. Now only 8% of accounts receive high-

priority treatment—enabling managers to concentrate their most experienced and skillful

collectors where the risk is greatest. Another 8% of accounts are identified for low-priority

treatment, which may consist of allowing them to self-cure, and thereby avoid spending money

to annoy valuable customers. In between, accounts are also better separated by risk, enabling

managers to more finely target, test and evaluate appropriate treatments.

ONE-CYCLE DELINQUENT ACCOUNTS

BEHAVIOR SCOREDECILE 5

BAD RATE: 23.32%

FICO® SCORE40.50%

TXN SCORE51.15%

TXN SCORE41.62%

TXN SCORE39.16%

TXN SCORE31.66%

TXN SCORE24.85%

TXN SCORE36.96%

TXN SCORE28.85%

TXN SCORE25.01%

TXN SCORE13.29%

TXN SCORE20.03%

TXN SCORE30.51%

TXN SCORE24.06%

TXN SCORE21.54%

TXN SCORE16.04%

TXN SCORE10.44%

TXN SCORE27.32%

TXN SCORE23.07%

TXN SCORE16.38%

TXN SCORE13.03%

TXN SCORE10.23%

TXN SCORE5.03%

TXN SCORE19.80%

TXN SCORE16.69%

TXN SCORE13.63%

TXN SCORE9.03%

FICO® SCORE25.77%

FICO® SCORE 20.81%

FICO® SCORE17.23%

FICO® SCORE13.14%

Behavior score + FICO® Score

Behavior score + FICO® Score + transaction score

Collection priority

20% 0% 40% 40% 0%

8%36%32%16%8%

DISTRIBUTION OF ACCOUNTS:

Increasing segmentation by adding FICO® Transaction Scores (TXN SCORE) to behavior score and FICO® Score

Priority 1: 40%+ Bad RatePriority 2: 30-39%+ Bad RatePriority 3: 20-29%+ Bad RatePriority 4: 10-19%+ Bad RatePriority 5: <10%+ Bad Rate

Figure 8: Strategy for prioritization of collections treatments

Page 11: Why Real-time Risk Decisions Require transaction Analytics · Education Cash Electronics Collectables Restaurant Entertainment Food Petrol Hobby Home Improvement Liquor Retail Travel

www.fico.com page 11

Why Real-Time Risk Decisions Require Transaction Analytics

insights »

Better segmentation of accounts for collections treatment can have a significant financial impact, as

shown in Figure 9.

Faster intervention to prevent losses

In a third study with a top UK card issuer, FICO sought to determine if the addition of transaction

scoring to behavior scoring would accelerate awareness of rising risk in distressed accounts and, if

so, how much loss mitigation value it would provide.

The study was conducted on a random sample of 850,000 accounts. The overall portfolio bad rate

(3+ cycles delinquent, charge-off or bankrupt) was 2.6%, compared to 2.7% bad rate average for all

the UK for the same period.

For the purposes of clear measurement in this study, we created a simplified scenario: The study

assumes that score cutoffs are the only trigger for intervention used, and that only one type of

intervention—terminating account utilization—is taken.

Figure 9: Estimating the benefit of sharper collections decisions

Portfolio size 1 million accounts

Delinquency % Balances affected Amount

With transaction scoring (75 basis point improvement in 1-to-3-cycle roll rate)

Baseline performance

1 cycle

1-cycle to 3-cycle roll

3-cycle-to-charge-off

1-cycle to 3-cycle roll

3-cycle-to-charge-off

1 cycle

15% of 1-cycle balances

85% of 3-cycle balances

7.5% of receivables

$19,687,500

$16,734,375

$131,250,000

7.5% of receivables

14.89% of 1-cycle balances

85% of 3-cycle balances

$131,250,000

$131,250,000

$16,608,867

Total receivables $1.75 billion

Sharper segmentation enables better collection prioritization, which results in lower roll rates for early-stage delinquencies. The chart below shows representative results from transaction scoring for a standard portfolio of 1 million accounts. By reducing the 1-to-3-cycle roll rate from 15% to 14.89% (compare the rows highlighted in green), transaction scoring reduces annual charge-offs by $1.5 million. The actual benefit you gain will depend on how effective your current collections segmentation scheme is, as well as your specific policies around collections treatments.

Results summary:

Annual reduction in charge-off

Annual benefit per delinquent account

Monthy reduction in charge-off

$1,506,094

$1.51

$125,508

Page 12: Why Real-time Risk Decisions Require transaction Analytics · Education Cash Electronics Collectables Restaurant Entertainment Food Petrol Hobby Home Improvement Liquor Retail Travel

www.fico.com page 12

Why Real-Time Risk Decisions Require Transaction Analytics

insights »

Behavior scores and transaction scores were independently analyzed to determine four cutoff points

each, equivalent to cumulative bad rates of 5%, 10%, 15% and 20%. The intervention is triggered

whenever an account reaches either the behavior score cutoff or the transaction score cutoff within

these bad-rate categories.

The transaction scores triggered account intervention an average of five days ahead of the behavior

scores. Although that difference seems insignificant, the opportunity for loss mitigation was not.

When the transaction score triggered account intervention first (27% of all accounts and 25% of

the bad accounts), the changing behavior patterns they detected were indicative of substantially

rising risk. In those cases, the transaction score identified preventable balance build averaging $516

per bad account it triggered. When behavior scores triggered account intervention first (21% of all

accounts and 18% of the bad accounts), the preventable balance build was much less, only $28

per bad account. (Note: Our benefit analysis does not include the remaining 52% of the population

where both scores triggered account intervention at the same time.)

BALA

NCE

DIF

FERE

NCE

AT

TRIG

GER

Figure 10: Early alerts to significant risk

Behavior score triggered �rstTransaction score triggered �rst

SCORE CUTOFFS

$26 $26 $46$12

$405 $419

$558

$681

$0

$100

$200

$300

$400

$500

$600

$700

$800

20% 15% 10% 5%

Page 13: Why Real-time Risk Decisions Require transaction Analytics · Education Cash Electronics Collectables Restaurant Entertainment Food Petrol Hobby Home Improvement Liquor Retail Travel

www.fico.com page 13

Why Real-Time Risk Decisions Require Transaction Analytics

insights »

On average, as shown in Figure 11, using transaction scores to trigger intervention prevented an

average of $197 of balance build per bad account, or an annual benefit of $2.56 per account in the

portfolio. For a portfolio of 1 million accounts, that equates to $2.6 million in balance build savings

from more timely decisions using transaction scores.

Figure 11: Added value of timeliness in risk scoring

20% 15% 10% 5% Average

Balance build prevented per bad account (annual)

Benefit per account (for all accounts in portfolio)

Annual benefit for portfolio of 1,000,000 accounts

Bad rate equivalents for score cutoffs

$163

$2.12

$152

$1.97

$237

$3.08

$2,557,000

$235

$3.06

$197

$2.56

FICO® Transaction Scores platform

The FICO® Transaction Scores deployment platform provides proven software for operationalizing transaction models. It incorporates the

same proprietary dynamic profiling technology used in FICO™ Falcon® Fraud Manager, relied on by 17 of the world’s top 20 credit card

issuers to protect transactions in more than 1.8 billion active accounts. This robust platform, which enables transaction data processing in

both real-time and batch mode, has enabled clients to handle volumes as high as 1.5 billion transactions a day. It is supported by a dedicated

team of software engineers.

Banks using FICO® Transaction Scores benefit from production-tested transaction variable libraries developed and refined by FICO analytic

modelers over 12 years of working with clients in the credit industry. These exclusive transaction characteristics have powerful predictive/

detection value, having been hand-crafted specifically to solve credit risk problems for bankcard portfolios.

FICO® Falcon Fraud Manager 6.0 can produce fraud scores and FICO® Transaction Scores from one installation of the application, sharing the

same transaction data feeds, and saving implementation costs and time. The FICO Connected Decisions Architecture also enables banks to

calculate FICO® Transaction Scores in real-time, then instantly make them available to FICO® TRIAD® Customer Manager for making real-time

decisions.

Page 14: Why Real-time Risk Decisions Require transaction Analytics · Education Cash Electronics Collectables Restaurant Entertainment Food Petrol Hobby Home Improvement Liquor Retail Travel

Why Real-Time Risk Decisions Require Transaction Analytics

insights »

For more information US toll-free International email web +1 888 342 6336 +44 (0) 207 940 8718 [email protected] www.fico.com

FICO, Falcon, TRIAD and “Make every decision count” are trademarks or registered trademarks of Fair Isaac Corporation in the United States and in other countries. Other product and company names herein may be trademarks of their respective owners. © 2010 Fair Isaac Corporation. All rights reserved.2623WP 01/10 PDF

The Insights white paper series provides briefings on best practices, research findings and product innovations from FICO. To subscribe, go to www.fico.com/insights.

For banks with transacting accounts, data from transactions is the most consistent and frequently

updated source of information on their customers. Under today’s economic and regulatory

pressures, it is essential for uncovering the additional insights that enable more accurate risk

predictions and sharper decisions on how to treat customers, from account management through

collections.

Most banks, of course, are currently interested in transaction analytics primarily for improving

control of risk. As the economy recovers, however, the opportunities that can be gained through

fine-grained separation of customers by other behavioral dimensions will garner more attention.

Precise decisions—driven by real-time detection of changes in not only risk, but customer needs

and lifestyle—will be essential for extending the right credit at the right time to maximize profit in

the recovering economy.

Learn more: Visit • www.fico.com/cards to learn about FICO’s overall program for Reengineering Card

Profitability, including using transaction analytics to reduce credit losses

Watch a • Tech Talk video interview on real-time risk decisions using transaction analytics

See related white papers at • www.fico.com/insights

Contact u• s to discuss how you can use transaction analytics to reduce credit losses

Better Results on »Both Sides of the Balance Sheet


Recommended