+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Will it Fit? A Comparison of Asymmetric Magnetic Reconnection Models and Observations Drake Ranquist...

Will it Fit? A Comparison of Asymmetric Magnetic Reconnection Models and Observations Drake Ranquist...

Date post: 12-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: eugene-webster
View: 218 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
26
Will it Fit? A Comparison of Asymmetric Magnetic Reconnection Models and Observations Drake Ranquist Brigham Young University Advisors: Mari Paz Miralles and Nick Murphy 2012 SAO Solar REU
Transcript
Page 1: Will it Fit? A Comparison of Asymmetric Magnetic Reconnection Models and Observations Drake Ranquist Brigham Young University Advisors: Mari Paz Miralles.

Will it Fit?

A Comparison of Asymmetric Magnetic Reconnection Models

and Observations

Drake RanquistBrigham Young University

Advisors: Mari Paz Miralles and Nick Murphy2012 SAO Solar REU

Page 2: Will it Fit? A Comparison of Asymmetric Magnetic Reconnection Models and Observations Drake Ranquist Brigham Young University Advisors: Mari Paz Miralles.

Magnetic ReconnectionOccurs in highly conducting

plasmas when magnetic fields are oriented in opposite directions

Observed in Plasma Experiments, Earth’s Magnetosphere, and the Sun’s Corona

Responsible for energy release and topology changes during solar eruptions

Page 3: Will it Fit? A Comparison of Asymmetric Magnetic Reconnection Models and Observations Drake Ranquist Brigham Young University Advisors: Mari Paz Miralles.

Solar Flares and CMEsThe standard model of solar

eruptions includes:Rising plasmoid contained

by flux ropesX-line and current sheet

where magnetic reconnection occurs

Inflow and outflow at X-lineHot, bright post-flare loops

Locations where loops meet the photosphere are called footpoints

Page 4: Will it Fit? A Comparison of Asymmetric Magnetic Reconnection Models and Observations Drake Ranquist Brigham Young University Advisors: Mari Paz Miralles.

NIMROD CodeStands for “Non-Ideal Magnetohydrodynamics with

Rotation and Other Doohickies”

Magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) describes macroscopic behavior of conducting fluids like plasmas using Maxwell’s equations and standard fluid hydrodynamics

Solutions represented as sums of finite element basis functions

Includes resistivity and anisotropic thermal conduction

Conducting wall boundary conditions that represent the photosphere

Page 5: Will it Fit? A Comparison of Asymmetric Magnetic Reconnection Models and Observations Drake Ranquist Brigham Young University Advisors: Mari Paz Miralles.

Symmetrical Simulation

Page 6: Will it Fit? A Comparison of Asymmetric Magnetic Reconnection Models and Observations Drake Ranquist Brigham Young University Advisors: Mari Paz Miralles.

Asymmetrical Simulation

Page 7: Will it Fit? A Comparison of Asymmetric Magnetic Reconnection Models and Observations Drake Ranquist Brigham Young University Advisors: Mari Paz Miralles.

Observational Signatures of Asymmetric Reconnection

Distortion of post-flare loops

Asymmetric footpoint motions and brightness

Location of X-line and flow stagnation point

Different inflow velocities

Drifting of the CME current sheet

Circulation within the rising flux rope

Page 8: Will it Fit? A Comparison of Asymmetric Magnetic Reconnection Models and Observations Drake Ranquist Brigham Young University Advisors: Mari Paz Miralles.

QuestionsCan we find evidence of asymmetric

reconnection in observations?

How well do the post-flare loops from the simulations agree with the observations?

Can we determine the ratio of magnetic field strengths on the two sides of an observed post-flare loop?

Page 9: Will it Fit? A Comparison of Asymmetric Magnetic Reconnection Models and Observations Drake Ranquist Brigham Young University Advisors: Mari Paz Miralles.

Projection Effects:Symmetrical

Page 10: Will it Fit? A Comparison of Asymmetric Magnetic Reconnection Models and Observations Drake Ranquist Brigham Young University Advisors: Mari Paz Miralles.

Projection Effects:Asymmetrical

Page 11: Will it Fit? A Comparison of Asymmetric Magnetic Reconnection Models and Observations Drake Ranquist Brigham Young University Advisors: Mari Paz Miralles.

Observations: Two Events6/7 Dec 2010 and 7 Mar 2011

Primary Instruments:Atmospheric Imaging Assembly (AIA) on the Solar

Dynamics Observatory (SDO)SECCHI EUVI on STEREO-A and STEREO-B

Both events have a candle-like cusp at shorter wavelengths

Page 12: Will it Fit? A Comparison of Asymmetric Magnetic Reconnection Models and Observations Drake Ranquist Brigham Young University Advisors: Mari Paz Miralles.

6/7 Dec 2010

Page 13: Will it Fit? A Comparison of Asymmetric Magnetic Reconnection Models and Observations Drake Ranquist Brigham Young University Advisors: Mari Paz Miralles.

7 Mar 2011

Page 14: Will it Fit? A Comparison of Asymmetric Magnetic Reconnection Models and Observations Drake Ranquist Brigham Young University Advisors: Mari Paz Miralles.

Tracing LoopsChoose loop to fit and trace it by clicking mouse

and saving X and Y coordinates

Page 15: Will it Fit? A Comparison of Asymmetric Magnetic Reconnection Models and Observations Drake Ranquist Brigham Young University Advisors: Mari Paz Miralles.

Matching SimulationsWe assumed that the footpoints of the trace and

the simulation had to be at the same locationMagnetic field lines tied to solar surface Important to know exact location of footpointsCan automatically scale, center, and rotate

simulation about the Z axis

Only free parameters are:Rotation about the baselineLoop heightMagnetic field asymmetry

Page 16: Will it Fit? A Comparison of Asymmetric Magnetic Reconnection Models and Observations Drake Ranquist Brigham Young University Advisors: Mari Paz Miralles.

2010 Event

Symmetric Case Asymmetric Case

Page 17: Will it Fit? A Comparison of Asymmetric Magnetic Reconnection Models and Observations Drake Ranquist Brigham Young University Advisors: Mari Paz Miralles.

2011 Event

Symmetric Case Asymmetric Case

Page 18: Will it Fit? A Comparison of Asymmetric Magnetic Reconnection Models and Observations Drake Ranquist Brigham Young University Advisors: Mari Paz Miralles.

Results (AIA Only)Event 2010

12 loops traced8 loops match

simulations8:1 – 5 loops4:1 – 2 loops2:1 – 1 loop

Event 20117 loops traced6 loops match

simulations4:1 – 3 loops2:1 – 1 loop1.5:1 – 1 loop1.25:1 – 1 loop

These are the best fits in the AIA data, but not the only possible fits. Rotation into STEREO further constrained

results.

Page 19: Will it Fit? A Comparison of Asymmetric Magnetic Reconnection Models and Observations Drake Ranquist Brigham Young University Advisors: Mari Paz Miralles.

Rotation To Stereo

Page 20: Will it Fit? A Comparison of Asymmetric Magnetic Reconnection Models and Observations Drake Ranquist Brigham Young University Advisors: Mari Paz Miralles.

ProblemsSimulations are Two Dimensional

Doesn’t allow for more complicated 3-D structure

Simulated loops are isolated

Difficult to trace loopsThey split, merge, and twist

Footpoints often saturated giving greater error to location

Page 21: Will it Fit? A Comparison of Asymmetric Magnetic Reconnection Models and Observations Drake Ranquist Brigham Young University Advisors: Mari Paz Miralles.

ConclusionsThe simulations are able to fit most observations

This technique can be used to get a rough estimate on magnetic field asymmetries

The 6/7 Dec 2010 event is consistent with a magnetic field asymmetry of 4:1

The 7 Mar 2011 event is consistent with a magnetic field asymmetry of around 1.5:1

Page 22: Will it Fit? A Comparison of Asymmetric Magnetic Reconnection Models and Observations Drake Ranquist Brigham Young University Advisors: Mari Paz Miralles.

Future WorkUse same process for other events

See if HMI Magnetograms and potential field models indicate similar asymmetries

Determine error on tracing loops (especially with the footpoint locations)

Look for other observational signatures of asymmetrical reconnection and compare them to these results.

Page 23: Will it Fit? A Comparison of Asymmetric Magnetic Reconnection Models and Observations Drake Ranquist Brigham Young University Advisors: Mari Paz Miralles.

AcknowledgementsAdvisors Mari Paz Miralles and Nick Murphy

Harvard-Smithsonian Solar REU Program

NSF Grant that supports the REU ProgramATM-0851866

Ed DeLuca, Kathy Reeves, EMS crew, Hospital Staff, my Parents, and everyone else that kept me alive

Page 24: Will it Fit? A Comparison of Asymmetric Magnetic Reconnection Models and Observations Drake Ranquist Brigham Young University Advisors: Mari Paz Miralles.
Page 25: Will it Fit? A Comparison of Asymmetric Magnetic Reconnection Models and Observations Drake Ranquist Brigham Young University Advisors: Mari Paz Miralles.

Loop Unable to Fit (Kink)

Page 26: Will it Fit? A Comparison of Asymmetric Magnetic Reconnection Models and Observations Drake Ranquist Brigham Young University Advisors: Mari Paz Miralles.

HMI Magnetograms6 Dec 2010 7 Mar 2011


Recommended