+ All Categories
Home > Documents > William Carey University Faculty Development

William Carey University Faculty Development

Date post: 13-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: iren
View: 28 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
William Carey University Faculty Development. Staying ahead in an era of assessment Robert G. Cuzzolino , Ed.D . Vice President for Graduate Programs and Planning, PCOM. Osteopathic Medical Education in an environment of planning and assessment. Objectives. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
36
William Carey University William Carey University Faculty Development Faculty Development Staying ahead in an Staying ahead in an era of assessment era of assessment Robert G. Cuzzolino, Ed.D. Robert G. Cuzzolino, Ed.D. Vice President for Graduate Programs and Vice President for Graduate Programs and Planning, PCOM Planning, PCOM
Transcript
Page 1: William Carey University Faculty Development

William Carey UniversityWilliam Carey UniversityFaculty DevelopmentFaculty Development

Staying ahead in an era of Staying ahead in an era of assessmentassessment

Robert G. Cuzzolino, Ed.D.Robert G. Cuzzolino, Ed.D.Vice President for Graduate Programs and Planning, Vice President for Graduate Programs and Planning,

PCOMPCOM

Page 2: William Carey University Faculty Development

Osteopathic Medical Education in an environment of planning and assessment

Page 3: William Carey University Faculty Development

Objectives

Be able to distinguish among mission, goals and outcomes

Describe how a continuous quality improvement program works.

Organize goals or competencies with related outcomes data in an understandable way

Describe the conditions necessary for strategic planning to yield organizational or instructional change.

Page 4: William Carey University Faculty Development

Objectives, continued

Describe methods of longitudinal analysis

Differentiate between the measurement of student achievement and the assessment of institutional or program effectiveness

Page 5: William Carey University Faculty Development

Mission, Goals, Competencies, Outcomes External reviewers focus on mission as the

foundation for institutional assessment and planning.

Mission statements are just a starting point in the assessment/planning process chain.

Page 6: William Carey University Faculty Development

Mission

Goals

Competencies

Student Outcomes

Program Assessment

Planning

Page 7: William Carey University Faculty Development

Mission demands goals Goals demand learning objectives Objectives demand measurement Measurement demands analysis Analysis demands planning Planning demands change Change demands review

in context of mission

Page 8: William Carey University Faculty Development

Be kind to your outside reviewers. The linkages among institutional goals,

program competencies and outcomes are not intuitive to most visitors, so why not map them out?

Page 9: William Carey University Faculty Development

Institutional Learning Goal

Academic Program Competency Group

Outcomes Data

II. Communication The student acquires interpersonal and communications skills that result in effective information exchange and teaming with patients, their families, and other health professionals.

Postgraduate assessment

(% above comparative low quartile)

Patient Instruction Skills: 98% (x=3.22/4)

Standardized Patient Communications Assessment (end of year)

[1-9 point assessment scale:

1= poor, low level/ 9= superior skill]

1st Year Standardized Patient

Communications Assessment (end of year)

Rapport 6.8

Empathy 7.2

Confidence 5.3

Info 7.0

Listen 6.6

Feedback 6.1

PE 7.3

2nd Year Standardized Patient

Communications Assessment (end of year)

Rapport 7.4

Empathy 7.3

Confidence 7.9

Info 8.0

Listen 7.4

Feedback 7.3

PE 8.1

Seniors rating of instruction in

physician/patient relationship:

89% appropriate

3.7% inadequate

7.2% excessive

Page 10: William Carey University Faculty Development

A look at a hypothetical WCUCOM GCO Grid

Page 11: William Carey University Faculty Development

On Change 1.3. “The COM must connect its strategic

plan to learning outcomes assessment in order to continuously improve the educational quality of its osteopathic medical education program.”

In other words, “How does my COM make changes?”

“Have the changes we’ve made been based on outcomes data?”

Page 12: William Carey University Faculty Development

Assessment Data / SWOT Analysis /Departmental Plans /Community Input /

Committee Actions/ Accreditor Recommendations/ Budget Requests

Planning

Resource Allocation Responsibility for Change

Progress Reporting

Annual Plan Renewal

Page 13: William Carey University Faculty Development

Outcomes, outcomes and more outcomes

“Constant testing will no more address the problems with our educational system than constantly putting an overweight person on the scale will cure obesity.”

-Anna Quindlen

Page 14: William Carey University Faculty Development

Agreeing on the terminology There is a difference between the

measurement of individual student achievement and the assessment of institutional or program effectiveness.

Unfortunately, accreditation standards often refer to both of these as“learning assessment” or “outcomes.”

Page 15: William Carey University Faculty Development

COCA Standard 6.6:

“The COM must define, publish and implement educational outcomes, based on its own educational objectives that will prepare students for osteopathic graduate medical education.”

Page 16: William Carey University Faculty Development

Your COM can not measure learning outcomes if it has not articulated its learning objectives.

Page 17: William Carey University Faculty Development

Standard 6.5 Documentation guideline for proving that your COM has stated learning objectives and assessment methods:

“Course objectives and course syllabi, evaluation process for all courses, and outcomes from the evaluation process.”

Standard 6.6.1“The COM must establish clinical competencies and a methodology to ensure they are being met.”

Page 18: William Carey University Faculty Development

Learning Assessment Plans Most institutions have or are developing

learning assessment plans.

These plans tend to focus on the individual student level and define the expected competencies, assessment methods, timing and (sometimes) explain how these outcomes are reported back to the college.

Page 19: William Carey University Faculty Development

Learning Assessment Plans are valuable at the individual student assessment level.

They document the measurement of “learning” up front for students, and also compel faculty to clearly define objectives and develop measures of student achievement - - as a system.

While they are a good basis for developing objectives and corresponding measures of learning, assessment plans do not produce program effectiveness data. They illustrate how you evaluate students… not the program.

Page 20: William Carey University Faculty Development

Question for the group

What have you learned from Comlex I results?

Page 21: William Carey University Faculty Development

200 Comlex scores mean nothing in and of themselves.

But if the lowest 50 scores are your PBL track students, you have a program effectiveness issue

Page 22: William Carey University Faculty Development

When does a set of learning assessment data help in planning? When it is aggregated When it is augmented by other data When it illustrates a trend When it is benchmarked or comparative When it suggests a course of action, a

change, or the need for a resource.

Page 23: William Carey University Faculty Development

What learning outcomes data sources can help inform institutional change?

Comlex scores are a mandated element.

Others?

Page 24: William Carey University Faculty Development

Student clerkship ratings Course grade trends Standardized patient encounters Student survey data End of clerkship exams Alumni surveys AOA, state board data Freshman surveys & Graduation Surveys Match data and residency selection data Certification

Page 25: William Carey University Faculty Development

Council for Higher Education Accreditation: “Effectiveness is a broad concept that refers

to the overall attainment of the mission and goals of a particular institution or program. As such, it may embrace various kinds of behavioral outcomes for students that go beyond student learning, such as employment, economic mobility, and contributions to personal and civic life…”

Page 26: William Carey University Faculty Development

Summary on outcomes data In the self study, we have two needs for

academic performance data:

First – Student Assessment WCUOM must show that individual

student achievement is regularly measured against the expected competencies in a planned manner. It is also important that we indicate when and how these expectations and their assessments are communicated.

Page 27: William Carey University Faculty Development

Second – Program Evaluation

The self study must coalesce individual student achievement results into meaningful program assessment data sets, and then show that the COM analyzed the outcomes data and took the appropriate action. Link curricular, instructional, organizational, and resource changes to data.

Page 28: William Carey University Faculty Development

Example of an institutional effectiveness process – COMLEX and DO student

success This brief presentation will share information that

was developed by the PCOM learning resource committee and shared with the DO Curriculum Committee and the DO Admissions Committee.

It departs from analysis of grades, clinical observation ratings and mean Comlex scores and treats retrospective data to inferential analysis, with conclusions as to meaning,

but leaves the action plan to the faculty.

Page 29: William Carey University Faculty Development

Tracking Change

This is most difficult aspect of continuous quality improvement through strategic planning.

Page 30: William Carey University Faculty Development

Longitudinal data

What do you (will you) know about practice characteristics (geographic distribution, specialty, residency match, certifications) of your graduates ?

Think ahead – define your questions before you graduate a class.

Page 31: William Carey University Faculty Development

Please rate the graduate, «FIRST_NAME» «LAST_NAME», on each of the following items by circling the appropriate number. In making the ratings please compare the intern with all interns you have supervised, not just those in your recent group:

Top Upper Lower Bottom Unable to Quarter Middle Middle Quarter Judge Quarter Quarter

Osteopathic Principles and Practice, which are established and incorporated in the development of skills. ____ ____ ____ ____ ____

I17

4.03.02.01.0

Competence in Osteopathic Principles and Practice40

30

20

10

0

Std. Dev = .69

Mean = 3.2

N = 65.00

Page 32: William Carey University Faculty Development

Question 17: Diagnostic SkillValue of Diagnostic Skill

129 5.1 5.1 5.1

14 .6 .6 5.7

2378 94.3 94.3 100.0

2521 100.0 100.0

"blank"

"weak"

"strong"

Total

ValidFrequency Percent Valid Percent

CumulativePercent

Preparation of Diagnostic Skill

153 6.1 6.1 6.1

71 2.8 2.8 8.9

2297 91.1 91.1 100.0

2521 100.0 100.0

"blank"

"weak"

"strong"

Total

ValidFrequency Percent Valid Percent

CumulativePercent

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Blank Weak Strong

General Rating

Per

cent

Value of DiagnosticSkill

Preparation ofDiagnostic Skill

Page 33: William Carey University Faculty Development

Question 13: Understanding the Payor/ Reimbursement System

Value of Understanding the Payor/Reimbursement System

141 5.6 5.6 5.6

375 14.9 14.9 20.5

2005 79.5 79.5 100.0

2521 100.0 100.0

"blank"

"weak"

"strong"

Total

ValidFrequency Percent Valid Percent

CumulativePercent

Preparation of Understanding the Payor/Reimbursement Syaytem

162 6.4 6.4 6.4

1890 75.0 75.0 81.4

469 18.6 18.6 100.0

2521 100.0 100.0

"blank"

"weak"

"strong"

Total

ValidFrequency Percent Valid Percent

CumulativePercent

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Blank Weak Strong

General Rating

Per

cent

Value Understanding theSystem

Preparation ofUnderstanding theSystem

Page 34: William Carey University Faculty Development

Strategic Plan

Goal #2: Enhance academic quality, faculty development, scholarly activity and clinical service.

k) Pursue state approval of interdisciplinary PhD research degree or pursue partnership with PhD-granting institution (see Goal 5 a)

l) DO curriculum committee to assess the adequacy of business in medicine content and encourage co-curricular presentations on business, management and medical economics.

m) Convert geriatric lecture content to on-line format; reformat course to focus on interactive discussion

Page 35: William Carey University Faculty Development

Summary on assessmentDemonstrating the connection of learning

outcomes to strategic planning is important.

Student assessment and program assessment are not the same thing, but both are important to the self study, and both run on their own respective form of learning outcomes data.

The COCA standards carry an expectation of longitudinal data.

Page 36: William Carey University Faculty Development

A look at the PCOM strategic plan


Recommended