+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Wind Lidar measurement optimization in complex terrain

Wind Lidar measurement optimization in complex terrain

Date post: 24-Feb-2016
Category:
Upload: rolf
View: 66 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Wind Lidar measurement optimization in complex terrain. Matthieu Boquet , Laurent Sauvage, Rémy Parmentier, Jean-Pierre Cariou - LEOSPHERE/NRG Ferhat Bingöl – Risø DTU Dimitri Foussekis – CRES Armand Albergel – Aria Technologies Guillaume Dupont – Meteodyn - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
20
Thursday. 22 April 2010 Wind Lidar measurement optimization in complex terrain Matthieu Boquet , Laurent Sauvage, Rémy Parmentier, Jean-Pierre Cariou - LEOSPHERE/NRG Ferhat Bingöl – Risø DTU Dimitri Foussekis – CRES Armand Albergel – Aria Technologies Guillaume Dupont – Meteodyn Catherine Meissner – WindSim
Transcript
Page 1: Wind  Lidar  measurement optimization in  complex terrain

Thursday. 22 April 2010

Wind Lidar measurement optimizationin complex terrain

Matthieu Boquet, Laurent Sauvage, Rémy Parmentier, Jean-Pierre Cariou - LEOSPHERE/NRGFerhat Bingöl – Risø DTUDimitri Foussekis – CRES

Armand Albergel – Aria TechnologiesGuillaume Dupont – MeteodynCatherine Meissner – WindSim

Page 2: Wind  Lidar  measurement optimization in  complex terrain

Lidar

mea

sure

men

t in

com

plex

terra

in

2

Thursday, 22 April 2010

Agenda

Introduction: complex terrain requirementsWind Lidar volume measurement vs. cups point measurement: assumptions for direct comparison and validity of these assumptionsCFD modeling and WindCube measurement process simulationGeometrical optimization and CFD combination for improving Lidar measurement in complex terrainsConclusions

Page 3: Wind  Lidar  measurement optimization in  complex terrain

Lidar

mea

sure

men

t in

com

plex

terra

in

3

Thursday, 22 April 2010

Wind Resource Assessment Program

Estimate the wind speed distribution:On-site measurement: masts and remote sensorsMeteorological stations and airports recordsFlow modeling software to extend measurements both in space (hub height and turbines location) and time (long-term scaling)

In complex terrain:Requires more on-site measurement locations to gain certainty in the WS estimation

A remote sensor is a precious complementary system:

But performances need to reach cup standards, i.e. bias<2%

Page 4: Wind  Lidar  measurement optimization in  complex terrain

Lidar

mea

sure

men

t in

com

plex

terra

in

4

Thursday, 22 April 2010

Pulsed Wind Lidar principleHOW AND HOW WELL DOES THE WINDCUBETM RETRIEVE WIND VELOCITY VERTICAL PROFILES?

Page 5: Wind  Lidar  measurement optimization in  complex terrain

Lidar

mea

sure

men

t in

com

plex

terra

in

5

Thursday, 22 April 2010

+10m

-10m

Lidar volume measurement principle

1) Pulse length and beam width

2) Conically scanning Probed volumes are

away one from another

3) Sequentially scanning

Page 6: Wind  Lidar  measurement optimization in  complex terrain

Lidar

mea

sure

men

t in

com

plex

terra

in

6

Thursday, 22 April 2010

Radial velocities measurement

v

vrad = v.axisbeam

qLaser shooting direction

aerosols

vrad

Radial velocity is the projection of aerosols velocity on laser beam axisFlow homogeneity assumption: aerosols velocity is the same at every radial velocity measurement locationU, V and W can be resolved

Page 7: Wind  Lidar  measurement optimization in  complex terrain

Lidar

mea

sure

men

t in

com

plex

terra

in

7

Thursday, 22 April 2010

Flat Moderately complex Mountainous

Terrain complexity influence

Lidar + mast

Forest

Terrain slope 10°

Wind direction

South-East:

Plateau, no trees

North-West:

10° slope, trees

At 80m Slope = 1.024

Slope = 0.988

Intercomparison of Horizontal wind speed at 78mN±40deg

y = 0.9627x - 0.2066R2 = 0.9911

y = 0.9457xR2 = 0.9907

0

4

8

12

16

20

0 4 8 12 16 20Cup Anemometer [m/s]

Win

dcub

e Li

dar

[m/s

]

At Risø test site Høvsøre

(onshore 1st phase of Norsewind Project)

Observed relative

difference:~1%

Observed relative

difference:~2%

Observed relative

difference:~6%

Page 8: Wind  Lidar  measurement optimization in  complex terrain

Lidar

mea

sure

men

t in

com

plex

terra

in

8

Thursday, 22 April 2010

CFD Modeling analysisUSING A CFD MODELING TO BETTER UNDERSTAND THE LIDAR AND ANEMOMETER DIFFERENCES IN COMPLEX TERRAIN

Page 9: Wind  Lidar  measurement optimization in  complex terrain

Lidar

mea

sure

men

t in

com

plex

terra

in

9

Thursday, 22 April 2010

Complex Spanish site

North-West wind

MERCURE/Aria TechnologiesCFD model adapted to complex topographyStationary CFD: A study of Lidar wind velocity retrieval process under various distorted flow conditionsSimulation of Lidar measurement process with MatLab

Met mast

WindCube

North-West wind

Page 10: Wind  Lidar  measurement optimization in  complex terrain

Lidar

mea

sure

men

t in

com

plex

terra

in

10

Thursday, 22 April 2010

Lidar vs. cup simulation

Lidar overestimation >5%

Lidar underestimation <-5%

North-West Wind

Terrain elevation represented with colorsBlack stars: locations of Lidar and cup measurement simulation

CFD simulation On site measurement

-5.8% -6.1%

Page 11: Wind  Lidar  measurement optimization in  complex terrain

Lidar

mea

sure

men

t in

com

plex

terra

in

11

Thursday, 22 April 2010

Horizontal gradient of vertical wind speed dependency

Lidar-cup relative difference vs. horizontal gradient of the horizontal wind speed No dependency

Lidar-cup relative difference vs. horizontal gradient of the vertical wind speed Clearly correlated

Page 12: Wind  Lidar  measurement optimization in  complex terrain

Lidar

mea

sure

men

t in

com

plex

terra

in

12

Thursday, 22 April 2010

Geometrical OptimisationHOW CAN WE MODIFY THE LIDAR MEASUREMENT PROCESS TO GET CLOSER TO CUP?

Page 13: Wind  Lidar  measurement optimization in  complex terrain

Lidar

mea

sure

men

t in

com

plex

terra

in

13

Thursday, 22 April 2010

Reducing the scanning cone ?

Probing a smaller volume then more homogeneous ? No! At a given height, difference depends only on

horizontal gradient of vertical wind speed

No magical scanning cone angleDangerous below 15° and above 30°

U UUW1 W2 W3

Radial vel.

Radial vel.Source of Bias

Page 14: Wind  Lidar  measurement optimization in  complex terrain

Lidar

mea

sure

men

t in

com

plex

terra

in

14

Thursday, 22 April 2010

30° vs. 15° - CRES data

Intercomparison of Horizontal wind speed at 78mN±40deg

y = 0.9627x - 0.2066R2 = 0.9911

y = 0.9457xR2 = 0.9907

0

4

8

12

16

20

0 4 8 12 16 20Cup Anemometer [m/s]

Win

dcub

e Li

dar

[m/s

]

Intercomparison of Horizontal wind speed at 78mN±40deg

y = 0.9457xR2 = 0.9871

0

4

8

12

16

20

0 4 8 12 16 20Cup Anemometer [m/s]

Win

dcub

e Li

dar

[m/s

]

30° cone angle 15° cone angle

Page 15: Wind  Lidar  measurement optimization in  complex terrain

Lidar

mea

sure

men

t in

com

plex

terra

in

15

Thursday, 22 April 2010

Adding more lines of sight ?

Consider first order variation of wind speedAs new unknown variables are introduced, one should add new Lidar equations to retrieve themHowever, a line of sight LOSi gives the radial velocity Si:

No LOS brings info on Wi

Page 16: Wind  Lidar  measurement optimization in  complex terrain

Lidar

mea

sure

men

t in

com

plex

terra

in

16

Thursday, 22 April 2010

Lidar-CFD combinationCOULD A CFD MODEL BRING THE MISSING INFO?

Page 17: Wind  Lidar  measurement optimization in  complex terrain

Lidar

mea

sure

men

t in

com

plex

terra

in

17

Thursday, 22 April 2010

Using a model to correct Lidar data

Model can provide the essential site specific info on the vertical wind speed distribution to correct Lidar data

Modeling

Relative difference on site Relative difference with corrected Lidar

Page 18: Wind  Lidar  measurement optimization in  complex terrain

Lidar

mea

sure

men

t in

com

plex

terra

in

18

Thursday, 22 April 2010

Methodology validation

Meteodyn WT and WindSim correction add-on tested on 2EN and CRES WindCubes on complex Greek site

CFD combination gets the bias from 6% down to 1%

Page 19: Wind  Lidar  measurement optimization in  complex terrain

Lidar

mea

sure

men

t in

com

plex

terra

in

19

Thursday, 22 April 2010

Conclusion

Point and volume measurement leads to wind speed value differences in complex terrainVertical wind speed loss of homogeneity is the main source of errorScanning cone angles between 15°-30° act similarly for horizontal wind speedMore lines of sight are not more useful infoMeteodyn WT and WindSim add-on:

WINDCUBE® Lidars data are now quantitatively useable on all types of

terrain

Page 20: Wind  Lidar  measurement optimization in  complex terrain

Lidar

mea

sure

men

t in

com

plex

terra

in

20

Thursday, 22 April 201020

Questions ?www.leosphere.com

[email protected]


Recommended