Date post: | 01-Feb-2016 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | khairun-niesa |
View: | 235 times |
Download: | 1 times |
WINDOW’S CLEANING THE WORLD’S TALLEST BUILDING -
SUPERSIZED EARTH – BURJ KHALIFA
NO. MEMBER’S NAME UiTM NO. CLASS GROUP
1. KHAIRUN NIESA BINTI ABDULLAH 2013633154 AS2455M
2. FATIN HAZIKA BINTI MOHD. ARIF 2013677038 AS2455M
3. NURUL ATIKAH BINTI MOHKSIN 2013287322 AS2455M
4. NUR ATIQAH BINTI THOMIRIN 2013 AS2455M
5. NOORUL AULA BINTI SAIEPUDDIN 2013647482 AS2455M
..INTRODUCTION..
· OBJECTIVES : TO ENHANCE STUDENT’S ABILITY AND KNOWLEDGE ABOUT JOB SAFETY ANALYSIS (JSA) TECHNIQUE (OR HAZARD IDENTIFICATION, RISK ASSESSMENT AND RISK CONTROL TECHNIQUE – HIRARC) IN ORGANIZATIONS / BUSINESS.
TO IMPROVE STUDENT’S ABILITY TO CREATE ABOUT SAFETY AT WORKPLACE.
· WHAT WE WANT TO ACHIEVE BY DOING THIS ASSIGNMENT IS TO KNOW VERY DETAIL ABOUT JSA THAT VERY RELATED IN THE WORKPLACE.
JOB SAFETY ANALYSIS (JSA)
• IS AN ACCIDENT PREVENTION TECHNIQUE WHICH SEEKS TO ;
Identify the hazard
-associated with each stage of a
job.
Develop precautions
-will eliminate or guard against these hazard.
Provide a safe job procedure
-can be used in job training or
the development of a safe system
of work.
...HIRARC...
• HIRARC ( HAZARD IDENTIFICATION, RISK ASSESSMENT, RISK CONTROL) CONTAINS PURPOSE THAT WILL GUIDE US ;
oTO IDENTIFY ALL THE FACTORS THAT MAYS CAUSE HARM TO EMPLOYEES AND OTHERS (HAZARDS) ,
oTO CONSIDER WHAT THE CHANCES ARE OF THAT HARM ACTUALLY BEFALLING ANYONE IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF A PARTICULAR CASE AND THE POSSIBLE SEVERITY THAT COULD COME FROM IT (THE RISKS) ,
oTO ENABLE EMPLOYERS TO PLAN, INTRODUCE AND MONITOR PREVENTIVE MEASURES TO ENSURE THAT THE RISKS ARE ADEQUATELY CONTROLLED AT ALL TIMES.
...ADVANTAGES JSA...
Its an effective accident
prevention tool that increases
workplace safety.
For new employees, the JSA process provides
pre-job training on the safe work
practices that will be used.
Helps experienced employees
maintain safety awareness and
limit complacency.
Help to reduce completion time
and decrease safety risks.
Helps workers adhere to company
policies and regulations.
WHY NEED TO DO JSA ?
* THERE WERE SEVERAL REASONS WHY NEED TO DO JSA ;
HELPS WORKERS IDENTIFY THE HAZARDS OF THE JOBS.
STEPS TO ELIMINATE AND REDUCE HAZARDS TO ACCEPTABLE RISKS LEVEL.
PROVIDES CLEAR INSTRUCTIONS IN THE EVEN OF A JOB CHANGE, OR A NEW
JOB.
HELPS IMPROVE OVERALL JOB TRAINING BY COMBINING THE EXPERIENCE
OF THE WORKER’S INVOLVED.
ENCOURAGES BETTER COMMUNICATION, INCREASES PRODUCTIVITY AND
IMPROVES MORALE.
WINDOW’S CLEANING THE WORLD’S TALLEST BUILDING - SUPERSIZED EARTH
– BURJ KHALIFANO. TASK / WORK
ACTIVITYHAZARD / S
(HARM)RISK
(PROBABLE CAUSE / S)
EXISTING RISK
CONTROL
RECOMMENDED CONTROL MEASURES
1. Cleaning unwanted things that stuck at the
window
Slippery Waste wash water dripping
from the window cause
cleaners skidding
Safe work practice
Use goods window’s
wash tools that easy to
wash window
2. Repair and maintenance the
windows
Falling objects
The tools drop from the high
altitude
Material lifting
procedures
Use suitable tools storage
that is be easy to be taken
3. Cleaning the windows by using prepared utility
Working at Heights
Falling from heights
Pre-use check and
regular maintenance
of safety equipment
Take care the utility that want to be used and
check before use
NO. TASK / WORK ACTIVITY
HAZARD / S(HARM)
RISK(PROBABLE CAUSE / S)
EXISTING RISK
CONTROL
RECOMMENDED CONTROL MEASURES
4. Cleaning Corrosive bleach
A small spill of bleach from
a container when filling a spray bottle
Safety equipment
such as gloves and
boots
Fill all the spray bottle
needed before start to work
5. Cleaning Hot weather Dehydrate Not in list Provide drinking facilities
TABLE 2 : LIKELIHOOD/ PROBABILITYLIKELIHOOD (L) INCIDENT RATING
Most Likely Slippery 5
Possible Chemical Splash 4
Conceivable Falling from Height 3
Remote Falling objects 2
Inconceivable Dehydrate 1
TABLE 3 : SEVERITY OF HAZARD
SEVERITY (S) INCIDENT RATING
Catastropic Falling from Heights 5
Fatal Chemical splash 4
Serious Slippery 3
Minor Dehydrate 2
Negligible Falling objects 1
TABLE 4 : RISK MATRIX TABLE
Severity (S)
Likelihood (L)
1 2 3 4 5
5 5 10 15 20 25
4 4 8 12 16 20
3 3 6 9 12 15
2 2 4 6 8 10
1 1 2 3 4 5
LOWMEDIU
MHIGH
TABLE 5 : RISK VALUES
PROBABILITY / LIKELIHOOD
HIGHLY LIKELY
VERY LIKELY
LIKELY LESS LIKELY
UNLIKELY
VALUE 5 4 3 2 1
SEVERITY/CONSEQUENCES
FATAL 5 25 20 15 10 5
MAJOR
4 20 16 12 8 4
MINOR
3 15 12 9 6 3
NEAR MISSES
2 10 8 6 4 2
PROBABIITY / LIKELIHOOD
SEV
ER
ITY
/C
ON
SEQ
UEN
CE
S
HIGHMEDIU
MLOW