+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Winter 2019 Survey Results - LATNP25.97% 12.02% 18.60% 12.40% 8.14% 0hglxp vl]hg exloglqjv rffxs\lqj...

Winter 2019 Survey Results - LATNP25.97% 12.02% 18.60% 12.40% 8.14% 0hglxp vl]hg exloglqjv rffxs\lqj...

Date post: 05-Feb-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 0 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
15
W inter 2019 Survey Results
Transcript
Page 1: Winter 2019 Survey Results - LATNP25.97% 12.02% 18.60% 12.40% 8.14% 0hglxp vl]hg exloglqjv rffxs\lqj wkh hqwluh orw 0hglxp vl]hg exloglqjv zlwk vwhsedfnv iurp iurqw 0hglxp vl]hg exloglqjv

Wiinter 2019 Survey Results

Page 2: Winter 2019 Survey Results - LATNP25.97% 12.02% 18.60% 12.40% 8.14% 0hglxp vl]hg exloglqjv rffxs\lqj wkh hqwluh orw 0hglxp vl]hg exloglqjv zlwk vwhsedfnv iurp iurqw 0hglxp vl]hg exloglqjv

Exxecutive Summary

Page 2 of 15

Page 3: Winter 2019 Survey Results - LATNP25.97% 12.02% 18.60% 12.40% 8.14% 0hglxp vl]hg exloglqjv rffxs\lqj wkh hqwluh orw 0hglxp vl]hg exloglqjv zlwk vwhsedfnv iurp iurqw 0hglxp vl]hg exloglqjv

Reespondent Snapshot

Planning Study AreaDowntown LAWest SideN/A-Retired-StudentFreelanceNearbyCentury CityHollywoodSouth BayKoreatownPasadena-Glendale-BurbankSanta MonicaCulver CityWest HollywoodSouth LAValleyWestlake-Echo Park-Los FelizBeverly HillsNorth East LASan Gabriel Valley

49

26

22

19

18

11

10

10

9

9

8

7

7

6

6

4

3

3

1

No

Yes

308

0.35%

4.84%

28.37%

19.72%

31.14%

10.03%

5.54%

Total

84

12

5

12

6

58

21

11

62

17

2

69

46

Page 3 of 15

Page 4: Winter 2019 Survey Results - LATNP25.97% 12.02% 18.60% 12.40% 8.14% 0hglxp vl]hg exloglqjv rffxs\lqj wkh hqwluh orw 0hglxp vl]hg exloglqjv zlwk vwhsedfnv iurp iurqw 0hglxp vl]hg exloglqjv

A walkable, retail-filled neighborhood with density centered around the new subway stations.

Mixed use mixed income transit oriented, walkable with locally based community services and easy access to other job and recreation/cultural centers.

Walkable pedestrian scaled environment that embraces transit as a feature of the neighborhood with convenient access to other areas around in LA (sans auto).

Affordable & ideally public housing near transit hubs that incorporates the needs of existing under-resourced communities.

Would love to see a walkable, vibrant place with lots of multi family housing along and near transit.

More public transit options, less congestion with cars and less parking hassles.

My vision is for the neighborhood to maintain it's current character with the existing buildings. There is a nice small village-like feel to our neighborhood that we would like to maintain. Single family homes are crucial to preserve as are low height and low density apartment buildings.

Much more affordable housing.

Dense, vibrant, diverse, transit-oriented mixed-use community.

Preserve R-1 single family homes, protect RSO and current affordable housing. Protect HPOZ's.

Retain the historical nature and quality of life in the area while using by-right zoning to build some affordable rentals and condos.

More of the four and six unit buildings that made this affordable.

To try best to preserve our great community and historic architecture, and future development should be very sensitive to that.

I envision the area remaining roughly the same with a bit more density and height on the boulevards .

Yes

No

Main Takeaways

Yes

No

No

Yes

Use the Neighborhood and Age filters to see how responses varied. Use the "Ctrl" key to select multiple options.

Page 4 of 15

Page 5: Winter 2019 Survey Results - LATNP25.97% 12.02% 18.60% 12.40% 8.14% 0hglxp vl]hg exloglqjv rffxs\lqj wkh hqwluh orw 0hglxp vl]hg exloglqjv zlwk vwhsedfnv iurp iurqw 0hglxp vl]hg exloglqjv

We want to live in a quiet single family neighborhood where we can park our car in our neighborhood without fighting peoplewho are taking transit. That is totally unfair.The neighborhood is already pretty developed. Adding affordable housing will give low income an opportunity to live in a higherincome area.Depends on the type of development. McMansion: No; Quality, affordable housing: yes.Developments along major traffic corridors, if affordable, could do a great deal to help the housing crisis.Yes, especially if they are affordable for people at all income and wealth levels. Diverse density makes for more vibrant, dynamic,livable neighborhoodsI don't think new developments will "improve" our neighborhood and could change it for the worse if they bring more traffic,but our neighborhood needs to contribute to meeting our city-wide need for affordable housing.

7.78%

25.56%

11.11%

37.41%

7.41%

10.74%

10.81%

13.13%

22.01%

13.90%

18.53%

21.62%

21.88%

7.81%

11.72%

11.72%

28.91%

17.97%

25.00%

12.89%

12.50%

12.11%

19.92%

17.58%

10.59%

16.08%

31.37%

6.67%

12.55%

22.75%

22.87%

25.97%

12.02%

18.60%

12.40%

8.14%

6.12%

24.49%24.49%23.47%21.43% 18.15%

34.25%28.77%

11.99%6.85%

42.31%

30.07%

18.88%

2.80% 5.94%3.06% 5.78%15.31%

21.77%

54.08%

Sccale of New Development

11 [Most Desirable] 22 3 4 5 6 [Least Desirable]

308

Page 5 of 15

Page 6: Winter 2019 Survey Results - LATNP25.97% 12.02% 18.60% 12.40% 8.14% 0hglxp vl]hg exloglqjv rffxs\lqj wkh hqwluh orw 0hglxp vl]hg exloglqjv zlwk vwhsedfnv iurp iurqw 0hglxp vl]hg exloglqjv

Addt'l affordable housing

Community faci…

Labor standards

Public open spaces

11

Additional affordable housing

Community faciliti…

Labor Standards

Public open spaces

Community facilities

Public open spaces

Labor standards

Additional affordable housing

Labor standards

Community facilities

Additional afforda…

Public open spaces

1 [Most Important]

13.24%

10.66%

12.13%

15.81%

10.66%

15.81%

21.69%

11.88%

7.28%

19.92%

21.07%

4.60%

15.33%

19.92%

27.48%

5.73%

15.65%

8.40%

20.99%

12.60%

9.16%

19.47%

8.78%

17.18%

5.34%

37.79%

8.40%

3.05%

[ p ]

7.17%

42.65%

5.73%

10.75%

14.34%

13.62%

5.73%

12.55%

10.70%

12.18%

19.93%

5.90%

17.34%

21.40%

10.74%

13.33%

16.67%

18.15%

7.04%

16.30%

17.78%

22 3 4 5 6 7 [Least Important]

Features of New Development

3

2

4

308

Page 6 of 15

Page 7: Winter 2019 Survey Results - LATNP25.97% 12.02% 18.60% 12.40% 8.14% 0hglxp vl]hg exloglqjv rffxs\lqj wkh hqwluh orw 0hglxp vl]hg exloglqjv zlwk vwhsedfnv iurp iurqw 0hglxp vl]hg exloglqjv

27.59%

16.75%

23.65%

9.05%15.24%

27.62%

48.10%

Most Desirable

Not if it involves displacement of current residents and/or demolition of Historic and/or RSO housingDepends on whether or not the small businesses that currently occupy many of the neighborhoods in Fairfax, esp. Little Ethiopia, could afford to stay.We need to combat homelessness and climate change. We need dense housing with transit that lessens car dependency.I'm in favor of more affordable housing. We have enough condos and high-priced rental units.We fought hard for an HPOZ in our area but there has to be a way to provide affordable housing in all areas, including ours.I wish to maintain the single family home neighborhood that I made a significant investment in when I purchased my home. I do not believe thatincreasing housing units in this area will increase affordability.

43.07%

19.31%

26.24%

11.39%

20.38%

31.75% 31.75%

16.11%

11

22

33

44

Hoousing

308

LeastDesirable

Page 7 of 15

Page 8: Winter 2019 Survey Results - LATNP25.97% 12.02% 18.60% 12.40% 8.14% 0hglxp vl]hg exloglqjv rffxs\lqj wkh hqwluh orw 0hglxp vl]hg exloglqjv zlwk vwhsedfnv iurp iurqw 0hglxp vl]hg exloglqjv

There is nowhere else to go. As a homeowner of over a decade, I couldn't afford to buy another home now. I bought what I could afford with a 30 year mortgage intending to hold onto this beauty forever. I don't want to be pushed out of my RESIDENTIAL neighborhood so that developers can get richer. I'm all for progress, but it has to work for all.

As close to another Metro Rail station as I could afford.

I would have to move quite far outside of Los Angeles, as I live in a rent controlled unit and can no longer afford market rate rents.

I'm a tenant and I honestly don't know where I would go. I've raised my kids in this community, served as a teacher in this community for 20 years, and honestly - I couldn't afford to move here. And if I got displaced, I don't know where I would move. Luckily, I have a very good relationship with my landlord, but this causes me a great deal of stress. Other tenants must be feeling very stressed and insecure.

As teachers, my partner and I would probably not be able to find affordable housing anywhere near this area.

I have no idea, and the prospect is terrifying

If I had to move I would not be able to afford to live anywhere else in LA.

I plan to stay. I'm aging in place!

I can’t afford to move out. If forced I would leave the state and I certainly don’t want to do that.

308

Affordability

Page 8 of 15

Page 9: Winter 2019 Survey Results - LATNP25.97% 12.02% 18.60% 12.40% 8.14% 0hglxp vl]hg exloglqjv rffxs\lqj wkh hqwluh orw 0hglxp vl]hg exloglqjv zlwk vwhsedfnv iurp iurqw 0hglxp vl]hg exloglqjv

Moobility

It will depend on whether other improvements are done - our bus service needs to be more frequent to connect to the stations, our streets need to be safer so I can bike or walk home at night. If the City and Metro do absolutely nothing besides put a station in, it won't serve us because we need connections throughout the neighborhood.

I will use it every day to and from work

Not convenient to where I work or shop

Make walking and biking easier. Protected bike lanes, combined with the new subway, would entirely eliminate my car trips in the area.

Fix the gaping pot-holes that make bike-riding dangerous for both riders and drivers alike. Provide bike lanes that follow major arteries their entire length.

Basically, just implement the Mobility Plan.

DASH Bus

Scooter (i.e. Bird/Lime)

Bicycle/Bike share

Metro Bus

Taxi/Ride Share (i.e. Lyft/Uber)

Walk

Personal Automobile

21

52

82

131

186

228

256

Occasionally

Regularly

Never

No

I'm not sure now, but would cons…

Yes

I don't own a car

Yes

No

Yes

No

308

Page 9 of 15

Page 10: Winter 2019 Survey Results - LATNP25.97% 12.02% 18.60% 12.40% 8.14% 0hglxp vl]hg exloglqjv rffxs\lqj wkh hqwluh orw 0hglxp vl]hg exloglqjv zlwk vwhsedfnv iurp iurqw 0hglxp vl]hg exloglqjv

15.93%

24.78%

38.05%

10.62% 10.62%

Yes

No

23.35%

42.13%

14.21%10.15% 10.15%

12.07%

20.69%

55.17%

6.90%5.17%

Paarking

Occasionally

Regularly

Never

No

I'm not sure now, bu…

Yes

I don't own a car

Page 10 of 15

Page 11: Winter 2019 Survey Results - LATNP25.97% 12.02% 18.60% 12.40% 8.14% 0hglxp vl]hg exloglqjv rffxs\lqj wkh hqwluh orw 0hglxp vl]hg exloglqjv zlwk vwhsedfnv iurp iurqw 0hglxp vl]hg exloglqjv

12684125

93

1,500+ 100+38,000+

900+

58

59

59

145 6096

4084

57

308

Paarticipation

5,000+

Page 11 of 15

Page 12: Winter 2019 Survey Results - LATNP25.97% 12.02% 18.60% 12.40% 8.14% 0hglxp vl]hg exloglqjv rffxs\lqj wkh hqwluh orw 0hglxp vl]hg exloglqjv zlwk vwhsedfnv iurp iurqw 0hglxp vl]hg exloglqjv

Page 1 of 15

Page 13: Winter 2019 Survey Results - LATNP25.97% 12.02% 18.60% 12.40% 8.14% 0hglxp vl]hg exloglqjv rffxs\lqj wkh hqwluh orw 0hglxp vl]hg exloglqjv zlwk vwhsedfnv iurp iurqw 0hglxp vl]hg exloglqjv

Page 13 of 15

Page 14: Winter 2019 Survey Results - LATNP25.97% 12.02% 18.60% 12.40% 8.14% 0hglxp vl]hg exloglqjv rffxs\lqj wkh hqwluh orw 0hglxp vl]hg exloglqjv zlwk vwhsedfnv iurp iurqw 0hglxp vl]hg exloglqjv

Page 14 of 15

Page 15: Winter 2019 Survey Results - LATNP25.97% 12.02% 18.60% 12.40% 8.14% 0hglxp vl]hg exloglqjv rffxs\lqj wkh hqwluh orw 0hglxp vl]hg exloglqjv zlwk vwhsedfnv iurp iurqw 0hglxp vl]hg exloglqjv

Page 15 of 15


Recommended