Date post: | 11-Feb-2017 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | todd-basile |
View: | 90 times |
Download: | 3 times |
G R E E N B E R G T R A U R I G , L L P | A T T O R N E Y S A T L AW | WWW . G T L AW . C OM
©2013 Greenberg Traurig, LLP. All rights reserved.
Workbar BostonJune 12, 2015
IntellectualProperty For Startups
Todd Basile – Patent & Trademark [email protected]
IP Strategies for Attracting Investment & Avoiding Common IP Pitfalls
Greenberg Traurig, LLP | gtlaw.com
Topics for Today’s WorkshopWorkbar Boston
2
> Key Takeaways
> IP Basics (quick overview)
> Reasons Startups Should Make IP a Priority
> Strategies for Spending Your IP Dollars
> Top IP Mistakes Startups Make
Greenberg Traurig, LLP | gtlaw.com
Key Takeaways If you take anything away from today, it should be this…
3
> Early‐stage companies should think of IP as an asset as much as a protection
> Quality of portfolio is key to its value
> Take advantage of creative approaches to maximize value and minimize cost
> “Protect first, talk later”
> Address ownership issues early and often
Greenberg Traurig, LLP | gtlaw.com
Intellectual Property Basics
4
Trademarks: Branding (e.g., words, logos, slogans)
Utility Patents: Functionality (e.g., chips, firmware, architecture)
Design Patents: Look and feel (e.g., shape, icon placement)
Copyright: Works of authorship (e.g., videos, music, code)
Trade Secrets: Proprietary info(e.g., business relationships, search algorithms)
Greenberg Traurig, LLP | gtlaw.com
Reasons Startups Should Make IP a Priority
5
> Statistically greater likelihood of startup “success”
Success premium over no patents
Greenberg Traurig, LLP | gtlaw.com
Reasons Startups Should Make IP a PriorityCritical Short‐Term Value for Startups
6
> Attract investor funding
– Investors love assets and barriers to entry
– Can also lead to higher valuation
> Marketing
– “Patent Pending” and “Patented” offer legitimacy
> Building your brand
– Focus brand development
– Avoid false starts, conflicts, wasted money on unusable marks
Greenberg Traurig, LLP | gtlaw.com
Reasons Startups Should Make IP a PriorityLong‐term Value
7
> Protect your investment
– Time, money, energy
– Deter others from entering your space
– Prevent others from undercutting cost
> Make money
– License or sell your IP (or even your company)
– Negotiate partnerships, supplier/distributor agreements
– Cross‐licenses
Greenberg Traurig, LLP | gtlaw.com
Strategies for Spending Your IP DollarsMaximizing Value and Avoiding Waste
8
> Top 3 questions
– How much?
– What to focus on?
– When?
> IP can be expensive
U.S.
Foreign*
* Assumes U.S. application already prepared
Greenberg Traurig, LLP | gtlaw.com
Strategies for Spending Your IP DollarsPatents
9
> Patentability searches
> Provisional patent applications
> Aggressive prosecution
– A bird in the hand (i.e., issued patent) is better than two in the bush (i.e., pending application)
– Accelerated examination; First action interviews
Greenberg Traurig, LLP | gtlaw.com
Strategies for Spending Your IP DollarsPatentability Search
10
> Scope of search:
– U.S. & foreign patent databases for similar patents / apps
– Technical publications and articles
> Cost savings:
– (Short‐term) Don’t waste $10k+ on application prep
– (Long‐term) Reduced prosecution costs
– (Long‐term) Higher likelihood of patentability and strength
Greenberg Traurig, LLP | gtlaw.com
Strategies for Spending Your IP DollarsProvisional Patent Application
11
> Cheaper and quicker to file than utility application
– No formal requirements
– Still need adequate disclosure of invention
> Must convert into non‐provisional (i.e., regular) patent application within one year (or else abandon)
> Can roll multiple, related provisionals into one conversion
> Allows you to advertise as “patent pending”
> Often not an additive cost
Greenberg Traurig, LLP | gtlaw.com
Strategies for Spending Your IP DollarsTrademarks
12
> Use ™ symbol until you’re ready to apply for federal protection
> Focus on your timeline– Trademarks are use‐based
– Weight benefits of early filing versus waiting
> Trademark Search– (short‐term) Avoid scrapping initial marketing and labeling
– (short/long‐term) Avoid opportunity cost of rebranding
– (long‐term) Negotiate co‐existence agreement or purchase of mark before opposer can hold mark hostage
Greenberg Traurig, LLP | gtlaw.com
Navigating IP Ownership IssuesWho really owns “your” IP?
13
> Situations that could raise questions as to who owns IP– IP developed before company formation
– Employee leaves
– Investor and customer pitches
– Use of vendors
> “An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure”– Ownership issues are far easier to address beforehand
– Avoid most issues by setting policies and sticking to them
– Forms are your friend
– Joint development
– Customer feedback
– Use of OSS
Greenberg Traurig, LLP | gtlaw.com
Navigating IP Ownership IssuesWho really owns “your” IP? (cont’d)
14
> Employment Agreement
– Common for employees to conceive of protectable IP
– Have all employees sign an employment agreement
> Non‐Disclosure Agreement (NDA)
– Prevents (in theory) others from stealing /sharing confidential info
– Ask investors, vendors/suppliers, customers to sign before sharing
– “Protect first, talk later” – best to file patent app before disclosure
More of a deterrent than an NDA
Obviates questions concerning public disclosure
Greenberg Traurig, LLP | gtlaw.com
Navigating IP Ownership IssuesWho really owns “your” IP? (cont’d)
15
> Work‐For‐Hire Contract
– Use with 3rd party service providers like software development and prototyping companies
– Ensures that your company owns IP developed by the contractor when performing the commissioned services
> Universities
– Common for startups to be built from university research
– Likely need license from university, even if it was your research while in school
– Tech transfer offices eager to license tech to make money
Greenberg Traurig, LLP | gtlaw.com
Navigating IP Ownership IssuesWho really owns “your” IP? (cont’d)
16
> Customer Feedback
– Ownership vests in the inventor
– Have agreement in place before customer input and submissions
> Shop Rights
– Others may have claim to IP if you use their facilities/know‐how
> Open‐Source Software
– Valuable tool when developing software
– Beware: OSS license may affect ownership of derivative works
– Comes up in investor due diligence and in M&A deals all the time
Greenberg Traurig, LLP | gtlaw.com
Key Takeaways Circling back…
17
> Early‐stage companies should think of IP as an asset as much as a protection
> Quality of portfolio is key to its value
> Take advantage of creative approaches to maximize value and minimize cost
> “Protect first, talk later”
> Address ownership issues early and often