New York City Government Workforce Profile Report 1
Acknowledgements
The Mayor’s Office of Operations and the Department of Citywide Administrative Services would like to thank the following contributors for their valuable assistance in producing this report:
Financial Information Services Agency
Department of Education
Health and Hospitals Corporation
School Construction Authority
New York City Housing Authority
NYC Employee Retirement System
Teachers’ Retirement System
Board of Education Retirement System
Department of City Planning
Office of Labor Relations
Office of Management and Budget
Office of the Actuary
Law Department
David R. Jones, President and Chief Executive Officer, Community Service Society of New York
Leslie Hirsh, Director of NYC Labor Market Information Service, City University of New York
New York City Government Workforce Profile Report 2
Table of Contents
Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................................................................. 1
1. Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................................................................... 3
2. City Agencies ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 6
3. Employee Type ................................................................................................................................................................................. 7
5. Gender & Ethnicity ....................................................................................................................................................................... 13
6. Salary ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 20
7. Attrition............................................................................................................................................................................................. 23
8. Retirement ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 26
9. New Hires......................................................................................................................................................................................... 29
10. Employee Titles ........................................................................................................................................................................... 32
11. Employee Representation ....................................................................................................................................................... 35
12. Next Steps in Workforce Planning ...................................................................................................................................... 36
Appendix A: Methodology............................................................................................................................................................. 38
Appendix B: Workforce by Agency ............................................................................................................................................. 56
Scope of the Report
This report covers the employees of City agencies that report to the Mayor, including the Department of Education, New York City Housing Authority, School Construction Authority, and Health & Hospitals Corporation. It excludes the personnel of independent agencies, as well as those reporting jointly or exclusively to other elected officials. The 39 entities included are listed with their acronyms on page 6. The report does not include data on contractors, consultants, unpaid interns or volunteers.
This report draws on personnel statistics spanning Fiscal 2003 through Fiscal 2012, using employee-level data from multiple internal City databases. Headcount figures (full-time and full-time equivalents) are based on calculations made by NYC Office of Management and Budget. Unless otherwise noted, all dollar amounts have been adjusted for inflation to 2012 dollars. More information on data sources, definitions, and methodology can be found on page 38.
New York City Government Workforce Profile Report 3
Fiscal 2012 Agency Comparison
Median Age Highest: Dept. of Housing Preservation & Development (53.3) Lowest: Dept. of Parks & Recreation (38.8)
Median Years of Service Highest: Dept of Finance (22.2) Lowest: Dept. of Parks & Recreation (4.0)
334,
210
335,
353
337,
425
340,
406
343,
889
348,
776
346,
845
337,
741
330,
258
327,
793
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Workforce Headcount (Full-time & Part-time (FTE) employees) 327,793Median Age 45.2
Median Years of Service 11.1% Female / Male 57% / 43%% Minority / White 61% / 39%
Median Annual Base Salary $65,299% Attrition 6.2%
% Eligible to Retire 18.8%Median Age at Retirement 60.3
% New Hires 5.4%Median Age of New Hires 29.4
% Unionized 93%
WWorkforce Profile, Fiscal 2012
1. Executive Summary
The Mayor’s Office of Operations and the Department of Citywide Administrative Services are pleased to present this report. The goal of this report is to make New York City’s municipal workforce (the “City’s workforce”) transparent to the people it serves, and to provide interested parties with the personnel data needed for analysis and planning.
Data on the City’s workforce over time paints a picture of remarkable stability. Through a period beginning in the aftermath of the World Trade Center attack and ending at the tail-end of a deep economic recession, the City has maintained a workforce capable of preserving a consistent level of service across agencies. Today’s workforce is slightly smaller than in Fiscal 2003 and salaries have kept pace with inflation, The City’s workforce is significantly more diverse than it was ten years ago. At New York City’s scale, these are no small achievements.
There are also challenges. As the City looks ahead this report provides valuable intelligence in many areas. The agency-by-agency snapshots presented in the appendix make clear where each agency must focus its attention. Effective strategic planning and management will be necessary to overcome the effects of rising costs in pension and benefits, to build upon diversity gains, and to succeed an aging and experienced workforce with one equal to the demands of the future. The section on next steps in workforce planning offers guidance for City managers who must face these challenges.
The City’s workforce is unique in its size and complexity. This report captures high-level demographics to compare trends over the last ten years and highlight challenges and opportunities in workforce planning for the future.
Age & Years of Service
From Fiscal 2003 to Fiscal 2012 the median age of City employees increased from 43 to 45.2 years of age and the number of employees over 55 years of age increased from 15% to 23%.
Similarly, the number of employees with more than 20 years of service increased by seven percentage points to 23% in Fiscal 2012. These trends suggest that the City has an aging workforce and an increasing number of employees who meet the criteria for retirement.
Figure 1: Fiscal 2003 - Fiscal 2012 Workforce (Full-time & Part-time (FTE) employees)
New York City Government Workforce Profile Report 4
$104,498 $101,207 $98,578 $104,475 $104,613
$108,379 $106,619 $107,724 $106,305 $103,651
$35,140 $32,031 $31,786 $31,460 $31,768 $32,420 $33,347 $33,336 $32,711 $31,828
$64,698 $59,572 $59,098 $60,220 $60,915 $61,813 $62,946 $66,119 $65,846 $65,299
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Gender & Ethnicity
In Fiscal 2012, the City’s workforce gender distribution was 58% female and 42% male. Teachers are predominantly women (76%), while uniformed employees are predominantly men (84%).
In Fiscal 2012, the City’s workforce had the following ethnic composition:
FFigure 2: Fiscal 2012, Ethnicity in NYC Municipal Workforce
While certain job categories tend to include more women, e.g. Paraprofessionals, and others include more men, such as Protective Service Workers, in six out of nine job categories, there have been significant diversity gains in gender, ethnicity or both over the past ten years (see page 11 for definitions).
In that period, the non-white ethnicity groups have grown proportionally larger, creating an even more diverse workforce. Managerial employees are slightly more likely to be women (51% are female), and the majority of the City’s managers are minorities with 47% white, 28% black, 13% Hispanic, 12% Asian/Pacific Islander, and less than 1% American Indian/Alaskan Native.
Salary
In Fiscal 2012, the City’s median full-time annual salary was $65,299. Median full-time annual salaries have remained relatively steady. However, the cost of pension and fringe benefits has increased by over 140% in Fiscal 2012 as compared to Fiscal 2003 in nominal dollars (unadjusted for inflation). This can be
attributed to increases in healthcare costs and changes in the market economy. In aggregate, the largest share of salary spending goes to the Teachers, Professionals, and Protective Service Workers job categories.
Figure 3: Fiscal 2003 – Fiscal 2012, Full-time Employees Annual Base Salary - Adjusted for Inflation
Median 5th & 95th Percentiles
Fiscal 2012 Agency Comparison
Gender Highest % Female: Dept. of Education (77%) Highest % Male: Dept of Sanitation, Fire Dept. (91%)
Ethnicity Highest % White: Fire Dept. (76%) Highest % Minority: Dept. of Correction, Dept. of Homeless Services (86%)
Fiscal 2012 Agency Comparison
Median Full-time Annual Salary Highest: Police Dept., Fire Dept., Dept. of Correction ($76,488) Lowest: NYC Housing Authority ($40,624)
39% 32% 20% 8%NYC
GGovernment
White Black Hispanic Asian American Indian/Alaskan Native
New York City Government Workforce Profile Report 5
Attrition & New Hires
The City’s workforce had a 6.2% rate of attrition in Fiscal 2012, with most departing workers either resigning (1.8%) or retiring (2.3%). The new hire rate was 5.4% in Fiscal 2012, which is lower than the rate of attrition. The median age of new hires decreased from 30 years of age in Fiscal 2003 to 29 years of age in Fiscal 2012. Median hourly salary increased from $19.47 in Fiscal 2003 to $20.10 in Fiscal 2012. The City’s new hires, those hired in any given year, have become more diverse over the past ten years. In 2012, 37% of new hires were white, 32% were black, 18% were Hispanic and 13% were Asian/Pacific Islander.
Retirement
In Fiscal 2012, 19% of the City’s employees were eligible to retire without reductions to pension benefits. Considering those eligible in Fiscal 2012 and those who will be eligible in the next 5 years, over 110,000
employees will be eligible to retire — 34% of the workforce. In Fiscal 2012, Administrative Support (33%), Officials and Administrators (32%), and Skilled Craft Workers (36%) were the job categories with the highest retirement eligibility percentage. However, historically, the number of employees who retire is quite small compared to the number eligible to do so.
Fiscal 2012 Agency Comparison
Attrition Rate Highest: Dept of Information Technology & Telecommunications (12%) Lowest: Fire Dept. (4%)
New Hires Rate Highest: Law Dept. (12%) Lowest: Dept. of Housing Preservation & Development (1%)
Fiscal 2012 Agency Comparison
% Eligible to Retire in Fiscal 2012 Highest: Dept. of Finance (51%) Lowest: Dept. of Education (10%)
New York City Government Workforce Profile Report 6
Department of Education DOE 132,273 40.5% 118,716 13,557
Police Department NYPD 50,325 15.4% 48,748 1,577
Health and Hospitals Corporation HHC 38,387 11.8% 36,335 2,052
Fire Department FDNY 15,404 4.7% 15,315 89
Human Resources Administration HRA 13,948 4.3% 13,918 30
New York City Housing Authority NYCHA 11,595 3.6% 11,293 302
Department of Correction DOC 9,999 3.1% 9,953 46
Department of Sanitation DSNY 8,998 2.8% 8,845 153
Administration for Children's Services ACS 6,196 1.9% 6,152 44
Department of Health and Mental Hygiene DOHMH 5,761 1.8% 4,470 1,291
Department of Environmental Protection DEP 5,740 1.8% 5,564 176
Department of Parks and Recreation DPR 5,598 1.7% 3,095 2,503
Department of Transportation DOT 4,807 1.5% 4,405 402
Department of Citywide Administrative Services DCAS 2,155 0.7% 1,919 236
Department of Housing Preservation and Development HPD 2,153 0.7% 2,105 48
Department of Homeless Services DHS 1,819 0.6% 1,818 1
Department of Finance DOF 1,814 0.6% 1,750 64
Law Department LAW 1,399 0.4% 1,265 134
Department of Design and Construction DDC 1,134 0.3% 1,095 39
Department of Information Technology and Telecommunications DOITT 1,107 0.3% 1,041 66
Department of Buildings DOB 1,067 0.3% 1,051 16
Department of Probation DOP 976 0.3% 976 0
Mayoralty Mayoralty 875 0.3% 864 11
Department for the Aging DFTA 833 0.3% 286 547
School Construction Authority SCA 660 0.2% 660 0
Taxi and Limousine Commission TLC 461 0.1% 435 26
Department of Youth and Community Development DYCD 388 0.1% 360 28
Office of Administrative Trials and Hearings OATH 372 0.1% 238 134
Department of Consumer Affairs DCA 327 0.1% 293 34
Department of City Planning DCP 253 0.1% 225 28
Department of Small Business Services SBS 242 0.1% 193 49
Department of Investigation DOI 192 0.1% 191 1
Civilian Complaint Review Board CCRB 124 <0.1% 120 4
Office of Emergency Management OEM 111 <0.1% 108 3
Business Integrity Commission BIC 72 <0.1% 71 1
Commission on Human Rights CCHR 62 <0.1% 60 2
Landmarks Preservation Commission LPC 58 <0.1% 51 7
Department of Cultural Affairs DCLA 57 <0.1% 43 14
Department of Records and Information Services DORIS 51 <0.1% 39 12
327,793 100% 0 0
PPart -t ime(FTE)
GGrand Total
AAgency Total % Share Full- t ime
2. City Agencies
The 39 agencies covered in this report vary considerably in size, from over 132,000 employees at DOE to fewer than 60 employees at DCLA and DORIS. The five largest agencies combined make up more than three-quarters of the workforce. The chart below lists the agencies included in this report, sorted by total number of employees. For more information about each agency, see Appendix B: Workforce by Agency.
Figure 4: Fiscal 2012 Workforce by Agency (Full-time & Part-time (FTE) employees)
New York City Government Workforce Profile Report 7
3. Employee Type
The scale and diversity of services provided by the City demands various types of employees. This section provides a snapshot of some of these subdivisions, focusing on part-time and full-time, uniformed service and civilian, managerial and non-managerial, civil service status, and occupational category.
Schedule: Full-time versus Part-time
Full-time employees include those who work a standard work week in a full-time title with an annual work schedule. In general, full-time employees work 35 to 40 hours per week and have a regularly scheduled work year of 261 days.
Part-time employees are those who work fewer hours than the standard work schedule or are in titles established as non-annual, for which no standard hours per week or days per year have been set. This includes seasonal employees, such as lifeguards and many park maintenance workers.
The chart below compares the City’s full-time and part-time municipal workforce from Fiscal 2003 through Fiscal 2012. The number of full-time employees grew from Fiscal 2003, peaking in Fiscal 2008 at almost 320,000 full-time employees. From Fiscal 2009 to Fiscal 2011, full-time headcount decreased by about 14,000 employees before stabilizing in Fiscal 2012 to around 304,000 employees. Compared to Fiscal 2003, part-time employees have decreased by over 30,500 employees in Fiscal 2012.
Figure 5: Fiscal 2003 - Fiscal 2012 Workforce (Full-time & Part-time (FTE) employees)
279,967 301,407 302,647 305,118 309,466 319,695 319,256 311,584 305,096 304,066
54,243 33,946 34,778 35,288 34,423 29,081 27,589 26,157 25,162 23,727
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Full-time Part-time (FTE)
New York City Government Workforce Profile Report 8
Non--Managerial 97%
Managerial 3%
Uniformed Services
The uniformed service includes the Police, Fire, Correction, and Sanitation services. In Fiscal 2012, 18% of the City’s municipal workforces were uniformed employees. This category does not include other titles at other agencies where employees wear uniforms, such as parks enforcement personnel or buildings inspectors. Like teachers, the uniformed services negotiate separate economic and terms-and-conditions contracts.
Figure 6: Fiscal 2012 Uniformed versus Civilian
Managerial Status
Managerial employees may have direct or indirect oversight of non-managerial staff or other managers and are typically not eligible to receive overtime. These are policy-influencing, high-level administrative and executive-level positions with salaries and terms-and-conditions of employment set by the Mayor. In Fiscal 2012, 3% of the municipal workforce had managerial status.
Figure 7: Fiscal 2012 Managerial Status
Civilian82%
Uniformed18%
New York City Government Workforce Profile Report 9
Civil Service System
Many job categories for NYC employees are defined by New York State civil service law. The civil service system is designed to ensure that public sector jobs are awarded based on merit as determined by examination, education, and experience. Most City jobs are filled from ranked competitive lists based on performance in a competitive exam.
Currently, about 2,000 civil service job titles are classified in the City’s civil service system. The creation of job titles and positions outside the competitive class requires the City to hold a public hearing and get approval of the New York State Civil Service Commission (SCSC) for each position.
The chart below shows the proportion of employees who have “permanent” status or are tenured teachers compared to those who are “provisional,” which means they have been appointed to fill a competitive vacancy when there is no competitive list available. All other employees (31% of the total) are counted in the “Other” category, which consists largely of DOE employees who are not teachers.
Figure 8: Fiscal 2012, Employee Type
62% 7% 31%
Permanent or Tenured
Provisional
Other
New York City Government Workforce Profile Report 10
Occupational Categories
The City’s municipal employees can be divided into occupational categories similar to those defined by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, which illustrates the breadth of employment. An occupational category is a group of jobs with comparable responsibilities and qualifications.
Administrative Support: Employees who perform clerical functions, 311 and 911 operators, office supervisors, and similar workers.
Officials and Administrators: Employees who have executive-level or policy-making responsibility for an entire agency or for a major agency division, and those who have overall, managerial input into and responsibility for the execution of broad policies.
Paraprofessionals: Employees who are paralegals, teaching assistants, and others who have job duties requiring education and knowledge in a special field and who supplement and support the activities of professionals or technicians.
Professionals: Employees who have specialized education leading to a college or graduate degree or to special credentials, requiring related experience, such as social workers, economists, medical professionals, and engineers. (We have created a separate category in this report for teachers, who are professionals.)
Protective Service Workers: Employees responsible for public safety and security, including police officers, firefighters, correction officers, traffic enforcement agents, and similar employees.
Service Maintenance: Employees who contribute to the upkeep and care of public buildings, facilities or public property, which includes sanitation workers, custodial workers, maintenance workers, and similar employees.
Skilled Crafts Workers: Employees who have specialized skills in a craft acquired through formal training and experience, such as stationary engineers, carpenters, mechanics, and electricians.
Teachers: For the purposes of this report, teachers have been separated into this additional occupational category.
Technicians: Employees who have a combination of basic scientific or technical knowledge and skill, such as computer programmers and engineering technicians.
Occupational Category % of Employees Administrative Support 7%
Officials and Administrators 9%
Paraprofessionals 14%
Professionals 18%
Protective Service Workers 17%
Service Maintenance 7%
Skilled Craft Workers 3%
Teachers 21%
Technicians 4%
Figure 9: Fiscal 2012, Headcount by Occupational Category
New York City Government Workforce Profile Report 11
4. Age & Years of Service
Analysis of age and years of service is an important part of developing recruitment and retention strategies. Changes in this area may also reflect changes in the types of work performed by City employees. And, as will be shown in Section 8: Retirement, understanding longevity within the workforce is critical for succession planning.
Age
From Fiscal 2003 to Fiscal 2012 the workforce aged by more than two years to a median of 45.2 years of age. This shift means that the number of employees reaching typical retirement age has also increased. The proportion of employees over age 55 increased from 15% in Fiscal 2003 to 23% in Fiscal 2012.
Figure 10: Fiscal 2003 versus Fiscal 2012, Age
1%
2%
9%
12%
12%
13%
14%
14%
12%
7%
4%
0% 10% 20%
2012
1%
3%
9%
12%
15%
16%
14%
13%
9%
4%
2%
0%10%20%
<20
20 to 24
25 to 29
30 to 34
35 to 39
40 to 44
45 to 49
50 to 54
55 to 59
60 to 64
65+
2003
New York City Government Workforce Profile Report 12
Years of Service
As the workforce has aged, employees’ years of service have increased as well. In Fiscal 2003, the median years of service for employees was 10.8. By Fiscal 2012, the median had increased to 11.1 years. While the shift is modest, the change in years of service distribution is notable. The percent of employees with fewer than five years of service decreased significantly, from 31% in Fiscal 2003 to 22% in Fiscal 2012, while the percent of those with more than 20 years of service has increased from 16% to 23% over the same period.
Figure 11: Fiscal 2003 versus Fiscal 2012, Years of Service
22%
23%
19%
12%
12%
7%
3%
1%
0%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40%2012
31%
17%
18%
18%
8%
3%
4%
1%
0%
0%10%20%30%40%
<5
5 to 9
10 to 14
15 to 19
20 to 24
25 to 29
30 to 34
35 to 40
40+
2003
New York City Government Workforce Profile Report 13
Male 43%
Female57%
NYC Government
Male 51%
Female49%
NYCPopulation(Employed)
Male 24%
Female 76%
NYC Government Teachers
Male84%
Female16%
NYC Government Uniformed
5. Gender & Ethnicity
New York City is one of the most diverse cities in the world. Recruiting and retaining a diverse and inclusive workforce is therefore an important part of serving New York City’s many communities. This section provides a brief look at the diversity of the City’s municipal workforce and its agencies, compared to the overall working population of New York City.
Gender: NYC Municipal Workforce versus NYC Working Population
The percent of the New York City municipal workforce that is female (57%) is much higher than the percent female in the overall New York City working population (49%). A closer look reveals that one factor in the strong female representation is a product of the large number of teachers, who are 76% female. The reverse is true of the employees of the uniformed services, 84% of whom are male.
Figure 12: Fiscal 2012, Gender in NYC Municipal Workforce versus NYC Population
New York City Government Workforce Profile Report 14
Ethnicity: NYC Municipal Workforce versus NYC Working Population
While the New York City municipal workforce is as diverse as the overall NYC working population, there are some differences between the ethnic compositions.
The percent of whites in the City government workforce (39%) is almost the same as that for the general NYC working population (38%). There are more Blacks proportionally in City government, at 32% versus 22% of the NYC working population. Fewer Hispanics work for the City, at 20% of City government employees versus 27% of the NYC working population. There are also fewer Asians working for the City, at 8% of City government employees versus 14% of the NYC working population. As will be discussed later in this section, however, proportions of Hispanics and Asians in the City’s workforce have grown in the past ten years.
Figure 13: Fiscal 2012, Ethnicity in NYC Municipal Workforce versus NYC Population
New York City Government Workforce Profile Report 15
49% 51%Managers
42% 58%Non-Managers
Male Female
Managerial Status by Gender
Managers are split almost evenly between men and women, with 1% more female than male managers. Non-managers are 42% male and 58% female.
Figure 14: Fiscal 2012, Managerial Status by Gender
Managerial Status by Ethnicity
The majority of managers are minorities, as non-white employees make up 53% of the managerial population.
Figure 15: Fiscal 2012, Managerial Status by Ethnicity
47% 28% 13% 12%Managers
39% 33% 20% 8%Non-Managers
White Black Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander American Indian/Alaskan Native
New York City Government Workforce Profile Report 16
Job Category by Gender and Ethnicity
Breakdowns of each occupational category by gender and by ethnicity show wide variations. The greatest differences in gender are in the occupational categories of Skilled Craft Workers (98% male), Administrative Support employees (80% female), Paraprofessionals (79% female), and Teachers (76% female). With respect to race and ethnic representation, notable differences are present in the Skilled Craft Workers (61% white) and Administrative Support employees (58% black).
Since Fiscal 2003, 6 out of 9 occupational categories have had significant diversity gains in gender, ethnicity, or both over time. For example, Officials and Administrators, which is majority male, had an increase in the proportion of females from 34% in Fiscal 2003 to 40% in Fiscal 2012. Similarly, in ethnicity, there is a growing trend of more employees in non-white ethnicity groups in this job category from 61% White in Fiscal 2003 to 54% White in Fiscal 2012.
Figure 16: Fiscal 2012, Occupational Category by Gender
Figure 17: Fiscal 2012, Occupational Category by Ethnicity
20%
60%
21%
31%
72%
72%
98%
24%
47%
80%
40%
79%
68%
28%
28%
76%
52%
Administrative Support
Officials and Administrators
Paraprofessionals
Professionals
Protective Service Workers
Service Maintenance
Skilled Craft Workers
Teachers
Technicians
Male Female
13%
54%
25%
30%
41%
28%
61%
58%
24%
58%
24%
35%
39%
30%
44%
19%
19%
45%
21%
14%
31%
15%
23%
26%
14%
14%
20%
7%
7%
9%
16%
5%
3%
6%
8%
10%
Administrative Support
Officials and Administrators
Paraprofessionals
Professionals
Protective Service Workers
Service Maintenance
Skilled Craft Workers
Teachers
Technicians
White Black Hispanic Asian American Indian/Alaskan Native
New York City Government Workforce Profile Report 17
57%
49%
47%
56%
41%
31%
91%
38%
66%
38%
58%
37%
57%
91%
36%
27%
26%
53%
30%
31%
30%
23%
39%
65%
46%
69%
77%
63%
77%
51%
60%
43%
46%
62%
50%
59%
44%
40%
62%
43%
51%
53%
43%
59%
69%
9%
62%
34%
61%
40%
61%
43%
9%
63%
73%
74%
47%
70%
69%
70%
77%
60%
35%
53%
31%
23%
37%
23%
49%
38%
57%
54%
37%
50%
41%
54%
60%
37%
BIC
CCHR
CCRB
DOC
DOI
DOP
FDNY
LAW
NYPD
OATH
OEM
DCLA
DPR
DSNY
LPC
ACS
DFTA
DHS
DOHMH
HHC
HRA
DOE
DYCD
SCA
DCP
DDC
DEP
DOB
DOT
HPD
NYCHA
DCA
SBS
DCAS
DOF
DOITT
DORIS
Mayoralty
TLC
Publi
c Safe
ty &
Lega
l Affa
irsQu
ality
of Li
feHe
alth &
Hum
an Se
rvice
sEd
ucat
ionIn
frastr
uctu
re &
Susta
inabil
ity
Econ
omy
Adm
inistr
ative
Serv
ices
Male Female
Gender by Agency
A breakdown of agencies into gender and ethnicity composition reveals significant differences among agencies. DOE, DFTA, HRA, ACS, and DOHMH have the largest proportion of female employees (70% and up). FDNY, DSNY, DOT, and DEP have the largest proportion of males (70% and up). The next two graphs are shown by Citywide Theme, as grouped in the Mayor’s Management Report (MMR).
Figure 18: Fiscal 2012, Agencies Grouped in Citywide Theme by Gender
New York City Government Workforce Profile Report 18
35%
34%
38%
14%
41%
18%
76%
52%
41%
50%
64%
51%
31%
55%
72%
14%
16%
14%
27%
17%
15%
48%
22%
47%
58%
38%
55%
42%
46%
26%
21%
34%
30%
34%
34%
40%
49%
54%
29%
26%
43%
32%
65%
31%
66%
10%
30%
28%
33%
15%
33%
42%
24%
8%
67%
45%
65%
45%
45%
60%
23%
49%
21%
19%
26%
20%
34%
31%
47%
48%
35%
40%
33%
42%
31%
30%
17%
33%
27%
20%
20%
17%
18%
13%
12%
9%
24%
10%
13%
7%
23%
18%
10%
14%
22%
17%
15%
19%
18%
21%
21%
11%
9%
11%
11%
13%
14%
18%
25%
23%
18%
22%
11%
12%
11%
15%
27%
11%
4%
10%
3%
10%
3%
2%
8%
6%
7%
8%
9%
4%
3%
10%
4%
17%
3%
12%
19%
7%
8%
8%
21%
14%
26%
14%
11%
9%
9%
5%
7%
12%
11%
13%
16%
11%
14%
10%
BIC
CCHR
CCRB
DOC
DOI
DOP
FDNY
LAW
NYPD
OATH
OEM
DCLA
DPR
DSNY
LPC
ACS
DFTA
DHS
DOHMH
HHC
HRA
DOE
DYCD
SCA
DCP
DDC
DEP
DOB
DOT
HPD
NYCHA
DCA
SBS
DCAS
DOF
DOITT
DORIS
Mayoralty
TLC
Publ
ic Sa
fety
& L
egal
Affa
irsQ
uality
of L
ifeHe
alth
& Hu
man
Ser
vices
Educ
atio
nIn
frastr
uctu
re &
Sus
tain
abilit
y Ec
onom
yAd
min
istra
tive
Serv
ices
White Black Hispanic Asian American Indian/Alaskan Native
Ethnicity by Agency
FDNY, LPC, and OEM have the greatest proportion of white employees. DOP, DOC, and DHS have the largest percentages of black employees. TLC, BIC, and NYCHA have the largest proportion of Hispanic employees. DDC, SCA, and HHC have the largest proportion of Asians. American Indians/Alaskan Native employees are found only in a few agencies. Looking at the trend over time, certain agencies have become significantly more diverse. For example, in Fiscal 2003, NYPD was 50% white and 50% non-white. In Fiscal 2012, the proportion of non-white employees increased to 59%, as other ethnicity groups form the majority of the agency. Indeed, all four uniformed agencies saw a proportional decrease in white employees over the ten year period..
Figure 19: Fiscal 2012, Agency Grouped in Citywide Theme by Ethnicity
New York City Government Workforce Profile Report 19
Trends in Gender, Race, and Ethnicity
Since Fiscal 2003, the proportion of male and female employees has remained stable, with a slightly higher proportion of female employees in Fiscal 2012 than in Fiscal 2003.
Figure 20: Fiscal 2003 – Fiscal 2012, Gender
Since Fiscal 2003, the non-white ethnicity groups have been growing proportionally larger, making the City’s workforce more diverse. Over the last ten years, the City’s workforce is becoming more and more aligned with the make-up of the NYC workforce population.
Figure 21: Fiscal 2003 – Fiscal 2012, Ethnicity
42% 41% 41% 40% 40% 40% 40% 40% 39% 39%
34% 33% 33% 33% 33% 33% 33% 33% 33% 32%
17% 18% 18% 19% 19% 19% 19% 19% 20% 20%
7% 7% 7% 7% 7% 8% 8% 8% 8% 8%
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
White Black Hispanic Asian American Indian/Alaskan Native
45% 44% 43% 43% 42% 42% 42% 42% 43% 43%
55% 56% 57% 57% 57% 58% 58% 58% 57% 57%
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Male Female
New York City Government Workforce Profile Report 20
0%
3%
17%
12% 13% 12%
21%
8%
5% 5%
2% 2%
<$20k $20k to $30k
$30k to $40k
$40k to $50k
$50k to $60k
$60k to $70k
$70k to $80k
$80k to $90k
$90k to $100k
$100k to $110k
$110k to $120k
$120k +
6. Salary
Salary is a key factor in budget and human resources management, impacting recruitment, retention, and labor relations. It is important to note most job title have a salary range set by collective bargaining.
Salary Distribution
While compensation covers all wages, overtime, pension, and fringe benefits, this section examines base salary, as it is the simplest for comparison purposes. In Fiscal 2012, the median annual base salary citywide was $65,299 with the middle 50% of the workforce earning between $42,958 and $78,885.
Figure 22: Fiscal 2012, Annual Full-time Base Salary Distribution
New York City Government Workforce Profile Report 21
Salary Trends
Over time, salaries change for a variety of reasons, including inflationary forces that influence buying power, collective bargaining agreements, policy shifts and the economic climate. Median salaries have remained stable over the past ten years, ranging from a low of $59,000 in Fiscal 2005 to a high of $66,000 in Fiscal 2010.
Figure 23: Fiscal 2003 – Fiscal 2012, Full-time Employees Annual Base Salary - Adjusted for Inflation
Median Full-time Salaries Compared to Overall Personnel Expenditures
After adjusting for inflation, median base salaries remained relatively unchanged, with a slight upward trend over the years following a drop in Fiscal 2004. However, overall personnel expenditures grew from $23.5 billion in Fiscal 2003 to $37.2 billion in Fiscal 2012. Nearly all of this increase can be attributed to the increased cost of pension and fringe benefits. As shown below, cost in pension and fringe benefits have increased by over 140% in Fiscal 2012 as compared to Fiscal 2003 in nominal dollars (unadjusted for inflation).
Figure 24: Fiscal 2003 – Fiscal 2012, Personnel Expenses and Median Annual Salary
$104,498 $101,207 $98,578 $104,475 $104,613
$108,379 $106,619 $107,724 $106,305 $103,651
$35,140 $32,031 $31,786 $31,460 $31,768 $32,420 $33,347 $33,336 $32,711 $31,828
$64,698 $59,572 $59,098 $60,220 $60,915 $61,813 $62,946 $66,119 $65,846 $65,299
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Median 5th to 95th Percentiles
$17.1 $17.0 $18.4 $18.7 $19.6 $20.9 $22.0 $22.3 $22.1 $21.9
$6.4 $7.4$8.6
$10.6$12.3 $12.1
$13.1 $14.0 $14.2 $15.3
$0
$10,000
$20,000
$30,000
$40,000
$50,000
$60,000
$70,000
$0.0
$5.0
$10.0
$15.0
$20.0
$25.0
$30.0
$35.0
$40.0
$45.0
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Med
ian
Ann
ual F
T Sa
lary
Pers
onne
l Exp
ense
(in
billi
ons)
Salaries and Wages Pensions and Fringe Benefits Median FT Salary
New York City Government Workforce Profile Report 22
$0
$20,000
$40,000
$60,000
$80,000
$100,000
$120,000
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Med
ian
Annu
al F
ull-t
ime
Sala
ry
Teachers Professionals Protective Service Workers
Officials and Administrators Administrative Support Service Maintenance
Paraprofessionals Technicians Skilled Craft Workers
Base Salary by Occupational Category
Since Fiscal 2003, Officials and Administrators consistently have had the highest median salary, while Paraprofessionals have had the lowest. Similar to the overall trend, median base salaries have remained stable over time in all job categories except for Teachers and Officials and Administrators, which each experienced a slight increase after Fiscal 2006.
Figure 25: Fiscal 2003 – Fiscal 2012, Median Annual Base Salary by Occupational Category – Adjusted for Inflation
New York City Government Workforce Profile Report 23
7. Attrition
Attrition is the reduction of the workforce due to separation from City employment. An analysis of attrition rates aids in determining hiring and staffing needs across agencies and can predict future costs associated with the delivery of public services.
Attrition occurs in the workforce for a number of different reasons:
Dismissal: Involuntary termination of an employee. Separation of Temporary Workers: Dismissal due to a seasonal or limited duration position Layoff: Involuntary termination of an employee due to staff reductions for operational or
budgetary reasons. Resignation: Voluntary departure of an employee other than by retirement. Retirement: Voluntary separation of employee who left the City stating reason due to retirement. Death: Employee dies while being employed by the City.
Attrition by Separation Reason
In Fiscal 2012, the citywide attrition rate was 6.2%, as 2.3% of the workforce retired and 1.8% resigned from their positions; other separation reasons each affected less than 1% of the workforce.
Figure 26: Fiscal 2012, Citywide Attrition
SSeparation Reason % of Full-time and Part--time Citywide
Median Age
Median Years of Service
Median Hourly Salary (All)
Retirement 2.3% 60.3 23.6 $ 36.6
Resigned 1.8% 35.2 3.2 $ 23.0
Dismissals 0.9% 40.2 2.8 $ 20.5
Separation of Temp. Workers 0.7% 37.5 0.6 $ 9.2
Layoffs 0.3% 34.2 4.0 $ 33.0
Deceased 0.1% 56.6 17.3 $ 26.5
Total Attrition 6.2%
New York City Government Workforce Profile Report 24
33% 29% 27% 26% 25% 23% 22% 26% 30%37%
13%16%
12% 13% 13% 15% 16%18% 15%
15%
19%14% 19% 17% 15% 16% 18%
22%27% 11%
9%
3% 2%2% 2% 3% 5%
4%2%
5%
25%36% 38% 41% 43% 42% 39%
27% 24%29%
1% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2%
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Retirement Dismissals Separation of Temp. Workers Layoffs Resignation Death
Attrition over Time
Among employees leaving City government, resignation was the most common separation reason in seven of ten years. The exceptions were in Fiscal 2003, 2011, and 2012, when more employees separated due to retirement than due to resignation or separation of temporary workers. The separation of temporary workers had the highest percentage in Fiscal 2011 compared to the other nine years. After Fiscal 2003, the retirement share continued to decrease to 22% in Fiscal 2009 before growing to 37% in Fiscal 2012. The proportion of dismissals rose to 18% in Fiscal 2010 in the aftermath of 2008 legislation resulting in an agreement to enforce a civil service law that requires the City to dismiss employees serving provisionally in competitive-class titles when competitive lists are established.
Figure 27: Fiscal 2003 – Fiscal 2012, Separation Reasons
New York City Government Workforce Profile Report 25
49%43% 46% 43% 43% 42% 41% 44% 49% 45%
51%57% 54% 57% 57% 58% 59% 56% 51% 55%
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Male Female
36% 37% 37% 36% 35% 33% 32% 30% 33% 35%
38% 39% 37% 40% 40% 41% 42% 43% 42% 38%
18% 16% 19% 18% 18% 18% 19% 20% 19% 18%
7% 6% 7% 6% 7% 7% 7% 7% 6% 8%
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
White Black Hispanic Asian American Indian/Alaskan Native
Attrition by Gender & Ethnicity
The demographic profile of the attrition population remained mostly stable from Fiscal 2003 to Fiscal 2012. The gender composition of the attrition population varies somewhat more from year to year than that of the overall municipal workforce; this variability can be attributed to the smaller population size.
Figure 28: Fiscal 2003 – Fiscal 2012, Attrition by Gender
Ethnic composition also remained stable. White (average of 34% of separating employees) and black (average of 40%) employees combine for a majority of the attrition, mirroring the ethnic composition of the workforce.
Figure 29: Fiscal 2003 – Fiscal 2012, Attrition by Ethnicity
New York City Government Workforce Profile Report 26
Figure 30: Fiscal 2012, Retirement Eligibility
Not Eligible by 201759%
Eligible2013-2017
15%
Eligible 201219% No Current
Pension Membership
7%
Retirement Eligibility
8. Retirement
The median age of City employees increased from 43 years of age in Fiscal 2003 to 45.2 years of age in Fiscal 2012, indicating that more City employees are or soon will be considering retirement. In Fiscal 2012, more than 8,000 employees retired with a median age of 60.3 and a median of 23.6 years of service. However, predicting retirement can be difficult due to the many additional factors to consider, including the overall health of the economy.
City employees participate in one of five New York City pension systems: New York City Employees Retirement System (NYCERS); New York City Teachers’ Retirement System (TRS); New York City Police Pension Fund; New York City Fire Department Pension Fund; or New York City Board of Education Retirement System (BERS). Within these pension systems, tiers define different benefits and eligibility requirements for employees depending on the year they joined the pension system.
Retirement Eligibility: Fiscal 2012–Fiscal 2017
In Fiscal 2012, 19% of municipal employees were eligible to retire with unreduced pension benefits. Another 15% will become eligible by Fiscal 2017, meaning 34% of the City workforce will be eligible to retire within the next five years — over 110,000 City employees. However, not every retirement-eligible employee will retire, and the rate varies among occupational groups, with Protective Services workers retiring in the year they become eligible around one-third of the time. More than half of Skilled Craft Workers, Administrative Support, and Officials and Administrators are eligible to retire in the next five years.
OOccupational Group EEligible in 2012 EEligible 2013--22017
Administrative Support 33% 18%
Officials and Administrators 32% 21%
Paraprofessionals 13% 14%
Professionals 25% 18%
Protective Service Workers 15% 14%
Service Maintenance 19% 14%
Skilled Craft Workers 36% 25%
Teachers 8% 9%
Technicians 17% 17%
Figure 31: Fiscal 2012, Retirement Eligibility by Occupational Group
New York City Government Workforce Profile Report 27
13% 13% 14% 14% 14% 15%16%
17%18% 19%
4%3% 3% 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% 3% 2%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Retirement Eligible Retired
Retirement Eligibility versus Retirement Historically, the number of employees who retire is quite small compared to the number eligible to do so. The graph below shows the number of employees that are eligible to retire within a given year against the number that actually retired within that same year.
Figure 32: Fiscal 2003 – Fiscal 2012, Retirement Eligibility versus Actual Retirement
The likelihood that an employee will retire varies widely by occupational category. Protective Service Workers generally have the highest retirement rate in each year, but experienced a steep decrease in retirement after Fiscal 2007. Similar but less dramatic dips can be seen since Fiscal 2007 in most other job categories.
Figure 33: Fiscal 2003 – Fiscal 2012, Retirement by Occupational Category
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Teachers Professionals Protective Service Workers
Officials and Administrators Administrative Support Service Maintenance
Paraprofessionals Technicians Skilled Craft Workers
New York City Government Workforce Profile Report 28
13% 13% 14% 14% 14% 15% 16% 17% 18% 19%
16% 16% 16% 16% 15% 16% 16% 16% 16% 15%
9% 9% 9% 9% 9% 9% 8% 7% 7% 7%
61% 63% 62% 61% 61% 61% 60% 60% 59% 59%
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Eligible in Current Fiscal Year Eligible within 5 Years No Current Pension Membership Not Eligible
Retirement Eligibility over Time
The proportion of employees eligible to retire without reduced pension benefits increased from 13% in Fiscal 2003 to 19% in Fiscal 2012. The share of employees eligible to retire within five years was stable from Fiscal 2003 to Fiscal 2012.
Figure 34: Fiscal 2003 – Fiscal 2012, Retirement Eligibility
New York City Government Workforce Profile Report 29
9. New Hires The City’s goal is to attract a diverse and talented pool of new City employees. Many job categories for NYC employees are governed by New York State civil service law. The civil service system is designed to ensure that public sector jobs in New York State and its municipalities are filled based on merit as determined by examination, education, and experience. Most City jobs are filled from ranked competitive lists based on examination scores.
In Fiscal 2012, City agencies hired approximately 17,000 employees, 5.4% of the City workforce. Compared to Fiscal 2003, the median age of new hires in Fiscal 2012 was one year younger and the median hourly salary was about 3.2% higher, without adjusting for inflation.
In addition to employees completely new to City government, the count of new hires includes former employees returning to the City and those transferring between City agencies.
% of Full--time and Part--
time Citywide Median Age Median Hourly Salary
Fiscal 2003 5.7% 30.0 $19.47
Fiscal 2012 5.4% 29.0 $20.10
Figure 35: Fiscal 2003 versus Fiscal 2012, New Hires, Nominal Dollars
New York City Government Workforce Profile Report 30
42% 43% 42% 38% 37% 36% 36%29% 33% 37%
31% 30% 31% 33% 35% 34% 35%40% 33% 32%
17% 16% 17% 19% 19% 19% 19% 20% 19% 18%
9% 10% 10% 10% 10% 11% 10% 11% 14% 13%
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
White Black Hispanic Asian American Indian/Alaskan Native
41% 41% 44% 42% 40% 40% 39% 37% 43% 45%
59% 59% 55% 58% 60% 60% 61% 62% 56% 54%
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Male Female
Gender & Ethnicity of New Hires over Time
From Fiscal 2003 to Fiscal 2012, the proportion of male and female new hires shows some variation with the proportion of female employees ranging from the high of 62% in Fiscal 2010 to 54% in Fiscal 2012. However, the proportion of new hires from various ethnic groups varies to a greater extent, showing greater diversity of new hires over time. The proportion of white new hires has decreased from 42% in Fiscal 2003 to 37% in Fiscal 2012. The proportion of black new hires increased from 31% in Fiscal 2003 to 40% in Fiscal 2010, but then decreased to 32% in Fiscal 2012. The proportion of Hispanics among new hires has remained in the 16%–20% range, similar to that of Asians, increasing from 9% in Fiscal 2003 to 13% in Fiscal 2012.
Figure 36: Fiscal 2003 – Fiscal 2012, New Hires by Gender
Figure 37: Fiscal 2003 – Fiscal 2012, New Hires by Ethnicity
New York City Government Workforce Profile Report 31
Attrition & New Hires by Agency
The percent of people joining and leaving varies significantly from agency to agency. The range of new hire rates goes from 20% to less than 1%, while attrition rates range from over 30% to approximately 4%.
Note that agencies with a high percentage of part-time employees (like DFTA) or seasonal employees (like DPR) will show unusually high turnover.
Figure 38: Fiscal 2012, % Attrition versus New Hires by Agency
-40%
-30%
-20%
-10%
0%
10%
20%
30%
DO
RIS
DFT
AD
PRCC
RBD
HS
DCP
May
oral
tyH
HC
LAW
DO
BTL
CD
CAD
CLA
DO
ITT
DYC
DD
EP LPC
HPD
DO
HM
HO
ATH
NYC
HA
DO
EFD
NY
DO
IN
YPD
CCH
RO
EMD
CAS
SBS
DO
TBI
CD
DC
HRA AC
SD
OF
DO
PSC
AD
SNY
DO
C
Attrition New Hires
New York City Government Workforce Profile Report 32
10. Employee Titles
One percent of the City’s 4,000 job titles, as shown in the chart below, represent 72% of the City’s full-time workforce. The top four titles make up over 30% of the workforce. Although the same title may have a somewhat different function at two agencies, planners can benefit from a high-level understanding of the status of employees in titles that make up the majority of workforce.
The chart below provides workforce data for all titles that have 1,000 or more full-time employees. Police officers, firefighters, education professionals, correction officers, nurses, and sanitation workers are among the top ten most populous titles in the City. Computer specialists (software), lieutenants (police), principal administrative associates, case workers, and associate staff analysts, all have retirement eligibility percentages above 40%. Almost a third of these top titles have employees with a median age above 50,
while more than a third of these employees have median years of service over 15 years.
Figure 39: Fiscal 2012, titles with 1,000 or More Full-time Employees
TTitle % of Citywide
Full-time Employees
Median Age
Median Years of Service
Retirement Eligibility
Attrition Rate
New Hires
Teacher 17.5% 42 11 8.2% 2.8% 2.7%
Police Officer 7.5% 34 7 7.3% 3.9% 8.9%
Annual Education Para 6.2% 49 13 12.1% 2.7% 3.2%
Teacher Special Education 5.9% 39 8 8.5% 3.2% 7.6%
Firefighter 2.6% 38 10 12.1% 3.3% 0.0%
Correction Officer 2.5% 42 11 23.0% 6.4% 6.1%
Staff Nurse 2.4% 49 8 13.3% 5.0% 5.2%
Sanitation Worker 2.0% 42 10 15.8% 3.7% 5.3%
Detective 1.7% 43 18 35.4% 7.7% 0.0%
School Safety Agent 1.6% 42 8 15.2% 4.1% 7.0%
Sergeant (Police) 1.6% 41 15 23.9% 5.3% 0.0%
Principal Administrative Associate 1.5% 52 22 47.9% 7.2% 1.3%
Clerical Associate 1.5% 51 15 37.9% 6.2% 1.2%
Clerical Associate (HHC) 1.2% 49 11 21.6% 6.1% 3.4%
Caretaker (Housing Authority) 1.1% 43 10 15.2% 7.3% 10.6%
Assistant Principal 1.1% 46 16 10.1% 1.6% 0.1%
School Secretary 0.9% 55 15 20.6% 1.8% 0.3%
Guidance Counselor 0.8% 44 13 11.4% 2.1% 0.8%
Eligibility Specialist 0.8% 47 8 23.1% 4.4% 8.0%
Community Associate 0.8% 46 8 12.6% 8.4% 5.9%
Traffic Enforcement Agent 0.8% 42 6 14.6% 4.5% 6.3%
Administrative Staff Analyst 0.8% 50 16 40.0% 6.9% 4.4%
Emergency Medical Specialist - EMT 0.7% 32 5 6.2% 5.1% 7.7%
New York City Government Workforce Profile Report 33
TTitle % of Citywide
Full-time Employees
Median Age
Median Years of Service
Retirement Eligibility
Attrition Rate
New Hires
Child Protective Specialist 0.6% 35 5 7.1% 6.8% 10.1%
Caseworker 0.6% 53 15 40.5% 4.6% 2.8%
Lieutenant (Police) 0.6% 43 19 48.2% 8.2% 0.0%
Patient Care Associate 0.6% 47 9 11.6% 4.2% 3.8%
Principal 0.5% 50 20 15.8% 2.2% 0.1%
Job Opportunity Specialist 0.5% 49 7 26.6% 4.7% 11.5%
Police Administrative Aide 0.5% 51 13 36.5% 5.5% 0.0%
Lieutenant (Fire) 0.5% 45 18 37.5% 4.8% 0.0%
School Social Worker 0.4% 51 13 16.0% 3.1% 2.3%
Associate Staff Analyst 0.4% 53 23 54.3% 7.9% 0.2%
School Psychologist 0.4% 46 13 15.6% 2.7% 4.4%
Secretary 0.4% 52 18 39.7% 7.6% 0.0%
Community Coordinator 0.4% 46 11 22.1% 8.9% 7.4%
Service Aide 0.4% 49 10 12.6% 7.4% 1.6%
Police Communications Technician 0.4% 41 10 13.1% 5.9% 3.8%
Computer Specialist (Software) 0.4% 54 19 49.4% 5.4% 3.7%
Maintenance Worker 0.3% 51 18 39.9% 7.1% 10.4%
Licensed Practical Nurse 0.3% 50 10 17.1% 6.0% 2.2%
New York City Government Workforce Profile Report 34
Employee Titles Analysis: Attrition & New Hire Rates
Reviewing the titles with consistently high attrition and new hire rates over time provides an opportunity to predict workforce needs. The following analysis looks at titles over a five-year period, averaging the workforce indicators for the titles with the largest headcount for attrition and new hires.
Over the last five years (Fiscal 2008–2012), similar titles appear in both attrition and new hires list, which shows that employees in these titles are leaving and also being replaced, although sometimes not at the same rates. However, certain titles appear on one list and not the other. For example, hundreds of clerical associates leave each year, but they are not being replaced at the same rate. Inversely, staff nurses are hired at a faster rate than they separate.
FFiscal 2008 -- 22012 FFiscal 2012
TTitle Average % of Citywide Attrition
Average % of Workforce in Job Title Median Age Median Years
of Service
Teacher 11.1% 4.5% 54 13.0
Police Officer 4.4% 4.4% 43 18.8
Teacher Special Education 3.1% 4.3% 49 9.0
Clerical Associate 2.4% 9.9% 60 23.3
Correction Officer 2.3% 6.5% 49 21.2
Annual Education Paraprofessional 2.0% 2.6% 63 18.2
Staff Nurse 1.8% 5.6% 46 5.6
Detective 1.6% 6.6% 46 22.0
Community Service Aide 1.4% 35.9% 65 1.2
Principal Administrative Associate 1.4% 5.6% 60 23.7
Fiscal 2008 -- 22012 Fiscal 2012
Title Average % of Citywide Attrition
Average % of Workforce in Job Title Median Age Median Years
of Service
Teacher 11.4% 3.6% 25 0.8 Teacher Special Education 6.5% 7.2% 25 0.8 Police Officer 6.2% 5.0% 26 1.0 Staff Nurse 3.0% 7.3% 34 0.6 Correction Officer 1.8% 4.0% 31 0.5 Resident Post-Graduate Year - L I 1.6% 63.5% 30 1.0 Annual Education Paraprofessional 1.4% 1.4% 30 0.8 Traffic Enforcement Agent 1.4% 9.8% 31 0.3 Clerical Associate (HHC) 1.3% 5.2% 33 0.6 Emergency Medical Specialist (EMT) 1.3% 11.0% 26 0.2
Figure 41: New Hire Information by Employee Title
Figure 40: Attrition Information by Employee Title
New York City Government Workforce Profile Report 35
93%93%94%94%94%94%94%93%94%93%
4%4%4%4%3%4%4%4%3%3%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2012201120102009200820072006200520042003
Pending
Non-union
Union
11. Employee Representation
In addition to establishing a merit-based employee selection system, State law grants public employees the right to bargain collectively.
In Fiscal 2012, 93% of the municipal workforce was represented by a union. This percentage is the same as the percentage of unionized employees in the New York State government workforce. A small number of employees serve in positions that are eligible for bargaining, but are not yet represented. Some titles are pending union certification by the NYC Office of Collective Bargaining.
The unrepresented employees are mostly managerial or confidential employees that are excluded by law from collective bargaining. The salaries and benefits for unrepresented employees in Mayoral agencies are set by the Mayor based on recommendations of DCAS and OMB. Salary and benefit increases often reflect aspects of negotiated increases, but there is no requirement that they do so.
The relative proportions of unionized and non unionized employees have remained stable over time.
Figure 42: Fiscal 2003 – Fiscal 2012, Union Representation
New York City Government Workforce Profile Report 36
12. Next Steps in Workforce Planning
Collecting workforce statistics and analyzing trends, as shown in this report, provide policymakers with the foundation to support workforce planning activities. Workforce planning is an essential process designed to ensure that an organization prepares for its present and future workforce needs.
However, workforce planning in government can be very different from workforce planning in other organizations. Since many personnel actions are subject to laws and agreements, City agencies are limited by how they hire, spend money, and assign work duties. In this environment, workforce planning is much more complex, but this makes planning even more valuable in order to be prepared with strategies to overcome these challenges.
Workforce Planning Toolkit
In December of 2013, the Mayor’s Office of Operations and DCAS will issue a Workforce Planning Toolkit with the aim of helping agencies improve how they plan for long-term workforce goals, attrition, leadership development and succession within their workforce. The Toolkit will help agencies take action on the information provided by this Workforce Profile Report in order to:
Identify and assess critical titles that have attrition risk and hiring challenges Create a robust succession pipeline, and Perform workforce planning to meet strategic objectives
The Toolkit will offer a Workforce Planning Guide and Risk Assessment Tool, both of which will be housed on a new Workforce Planning website. These Tools will help guide human resource decisions, by making it easier to identify titles at risk of being left vacant and how to address those concerns. They will also help executive-level managers make long-term strategic decisions on how their workforce will meet an agency’s changing missions and goals.
Workforce Planning Website
The Workforce Planning Website will provide easy access for HR professionals to obtain workforce planning tools and guidance. With the ability to leverage centralized data, guidance and templates, users will be able to take advantage of materials formerly unavailable or only available outside of their agency.
Workforce Planning Guide
The Workforce Planning Guide will be a comprehensive guide for how to design and build a workforce and succession plan, while at the same time providing advice on how to tailor these plans agency to agency. The guide will contain detailed steps on workforce and succession planning, best practices, examples of strategic plans and pipeline analyses, and workforce and succession planning templates.
Risk Assessment Tool
The Risk Assessment Tool has been developed to provide agencies with an accessible, seamless way of identifying at-risk titles. By creating risk indices based on attrition and hiring, the user has the ability
New York City Government Workforce Profile Report 37
contextualize risks through benchmarking against agency-level and citywide average risk levels. Recognizing that each agency has a distinct set of operational priorities, the Tool was designed to be interactive such that the user can customize how risk is measured in a way that makes most sense to their agency. In addition, the tool provides users with demographic and salary information within the title and for the selected agency.
Diversity Management
Diversity management is a form of workforce planning that incorporates the vast diversity of employee backgrounds in a manner that results in the highest level of productivity for both the organization and the individual. It sustains an organization through the development of a pipeline positioned for leadership. The foundational key practices associated with diversity management are the following:
Inclusive pipeline development strategy championed by Commissioners Standardized performance evaluations and goal setting for management Structured interviews, diverse panels, quarterly reviews of placements Annual identification of ready now & high potential talent and leadership competencies Formalized mentorship and sponsorship of employees Engagement/Morale surveys and tools that capture the skills, career goals and experiences
of employees Measurement indicating best recruitment sources for diverse candidates
Next Steps
Provide agencies with a Workforce Planning Toolkit designed to assist agencies in (1) identifying mission-critical job titles and core competencies associated with those job titles; (2) conducting pipeline analyses of those titles; and (3) determining internal and external support necessary to support career paths into target titles and (4) addressing challenges and weaknesses that impact the agency’s ability to continue to achieve its mission.
Establish citywide Office of Workforce Planning (OWP) within the Human Capital division of DCAS. OWP will be responsible for attracting, developing, and retaining a talented and diverse workforce and for creating and maintaining statistical analyses of the workforce profile. The office will serve as a strategic partner for city agencies in implementing workforce planning strategies that optimize organizational effectiveness within the context of civil service compliance.
Convene a Workforce Development and Planning Advisory Group that will include representatives from the Department of Citywide Administrative Services, the Department of Education, the City University of New York, Mayor’s Office of Operations, the Office of Management and Budget, the Office of Labor Relations, as well as representatives from City agencies and other stakeholders, to serve as a forum for leadership on best practices.
New York City Government Workforce Profile Report 38
Appendix A: Methodology
Overall Report Definitions
Agencies Unless otherwise stated all graphs and charts show information relative to the 36 mayoral agencies, Health and Hospitals Corporation (HHC), New York City Housing authority (NYCHA) and School Construction Authority (SCA). Workforce Full-time (FT) and Full-time Equivalents (FTEs) count is based on calculations made by NYC Office of
Management and Budget. Based on data from the Payroll Management System (PMS) and data provided by HHC and SCA, the
following definitions were used for calculations of the workforce: Total Workforce: all active employees and all employees who have left their position in the fiscal
year mentioned (for Separation Reasons, see Section 8: Attrition). Active Employees: employees who were employed last fiscal year and are still employed, as well
as new employees hired in that fiscal year.
Employee Types Full-time employees: include those who work the standard work week in a full time, per annum title
with an annual work schedule. In general full time employees work 35, 37.5, or 40 hours per week and have a full time work year of 261 days and work on a regularly schedule basis all year round.
Part-time employees: fall into two categories: (a) employees in titles established as non-per-annum jobs, with no standard number of hours per week or days per year; and (b) employees hired on a part time basis in a full time per annum title who do not work the standard number of hours or days in a work year.
Uniformed status: the Uniformed Forces include only titles in the Police Service, Fire Service, Correction Service and Sanitation Service. This category does not include other titles in which employees wear uniforms, but are not in the uniformed force. For example, Special Officers, Traffic Enforcement Agents, and School Safety Agents wear uniforms, but are not in a uniformed service, even if they work in the NYPD.
Managerial status: These are policy influencing, high level, administrative and executive level positions.
Inflation Unless otherwise stated, all dollar values have been adjusted for inflation using 2012 dollars using the Consumer Price Index – All Urban Consumers of the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Inflation was reindexed from calendar to fiscal year by averaging monthly inflation in a given fiscal year.
New York City Government Workforce Profile Report 39
Section 1 – Executive Summary
Figure 1: Fiscal 2003 - Fiscal 2012 Workforce (Full-time & Part-time (FTE) employees) - see Section 3 of the methodology for definitions and calculations.
Figure 2: Fiscal 2012, Ethnicity in NYC Municipal Workforce) - see Section 5 of the methodology for
definitions and calculations. Figure 3: Fiscal 2003 – Fiscal 2012, Full-time Employees Annual Base Salary - Adjusted for Inflation) -
see Section 6 of the methodology for definitions and calculations.
New York City Government Workforce Profile Report 40
Section 2 – City Agencies
Sources: NYC Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
Calculations: Figure 4: Fiscal 2012 Workforce by Agency (Full-time & Part-time (FTE) employees)- Shows counts of
Full-time and Full-time Equivalents by agency in Fiscal 2012.
New York City Government Workforce Profile Report 41
Section 3 – Employee Type
Sources: Payroll Management System (PMS) Data was also provided by HHC and SCA.
Definitions: In New York City, the Department of Citywide Administrative Services (DCAS) administers the civil service system for all New York City agencies, including the offices of elected officials in the City. This system includes certain agencies, such as the offices of district attorneys, public administrators and pension systems that have historically been treated as City agencies for civil service purposes. In addition, pursuant to either statute or case law, DCAS administers the civil service system for several other entities, which are not agencies or offices of the City of New York: Transit Authority, Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority, New York City Housing Authority, the Municipal Water Finance Authority and Department of Education non-pedagogical employees. Personnel administration of teachers and other pedagogical staff falls within the jurisdiction of the New York State Regents and Education Department rather than the State Civil Service Commission. Competitive Status:
Permanent: appointments made from an open-competitive eligible list for that title. Tenured: teachers and other pedagogical employees after serving for a prescribed period achieve
“tenure” pursuant to collective bargaining agreements. Provisional: appointment made to fill a vacancy when there is no eligible list for a competitive
class title. Other: consists of the Unclassified Service (pedagogical employees not in a teacher title, elected
officials, legislative employees, agency heads, etc….), Labor class and Non-Competitive and Exempt class employees.
Occupational Groups:
Officials and Administrators: Employees who have executive-level, policy-making responsibility for an entire agency or for a major agency division and those who have overall, managerial input into and responsibility for the execution of broad policies.
Administrative Support: Employees who are Clericals, 311 and 911 operators, office supervisors, and similar workers.
Paraprofessionals: Employees who are paralegals, teaching assistants, and others who have job duties requiring education and knowledge in a special field and who supplement and support the activities of professionals or technicians.
Professionals: Employees who have specialized education leading to a college or graduate degree or to special credentials, requiring related experience, such as social workers, economists, medical professionals, and engineers.
Protective Service Workers: Employees responsible for public safety and security, including police officers, firefighters, correction officers, traffic enforcement agents and similar employees.
New York City Government Workforce Profile Report 42
Service Maintenance: Employees who contribute to the upkeep and care of public buildings, facilities or public property, which includes sanitation workers, custodial workers, maintenance workers and similar employees.
Skilled Crafts Workers: Employees who are stationary engineers, carpenters, mechanics, and electricians, who have specialized skills in a craft acquired through formal training and experience.
Technicians: Employees who have a combination of basic scientific or technical knowledge and skill, such as computer programmers and engineering technicians.
Teachers: For the purposes of this report, since teachers make up a majority of the workforce, employees with the title “Teacher” has been separated into this additional occupation category.
Calculations: Figure 5: Fiscal 2003 - Fiscal 2012 Workforce (Full-time & Part-time (FTE) employees) - Shows count of
Full-time and Full-time Equivalents from Fiscal 2003 through Fiscal 2012.
Figure 6: Fiscal 2012 Uniformed versus Civilian- Shows the percent of civilian and uniformed employees out of the total active employees in Fiscal 2012.
Figure 7: Fiscal 2012 Managerial Status- Shows the percent of managerial and non managerial employees out of the total active employees in Fiscal 2012.
Figure 8: Fiscal 2012, Employee Type- Shows the percent of employees in the Permanent or Tenured, Provisional, and Other categories out of the total active employees in Fiscal 2012.
New York City Government Workforce Profile Report 43
Figure 9: Fiscal 2012, Headcount by Occupational Category – Shows percent of active employees in each job category in Fiscal 2012.
New York City Government Workforce Profile Report 44
Section 4 – Age and Years of Service Sources:
Payroll Management System (PMS) Data was also provided by HHC and SCA.
Definitions: Years of Service: are calculated in each fiscal year using, for each employee, the date in which their
employment with City government started. Median Age: is calculated in each fiscal year using the date of birth reported by each employee at the
beginning of their employment with City government Calculations: Figure 10: Fiscal 2003 versus Fiscal 2012, Age- Shows the percent of active employees in each age
bracket in fiscal year 2003 and fiscal year 2012.
Figure 11: Fiscal 2003 versus Fiscal 2012, Years of Service- Shows the percent of active employees in each years of service bracket in fiscal year 2003 and fiscal year 2012.
New York City Government Workforce Profile Report 45
Section 5 – Gender and Ethnicity Sources:
Payroll Management System (PMS) Citywide Equal Employment Database System (CEEDS) Data was also provided by HHC and SCA American Community Survey (ACS), New York City, 2011
Definitions: Gender: is self-reported by employees. Besides male and female, the gender distribution includes a
third category of employees who have voluntarily chosen not to self-identify by gender and/or were not identified by other means. This category, defined as “Unknown,” is excluded from the analysis due to data quality standards and comprises a small fraction of the workforce.
Ethnicity: is self-reported by employees. Besides White, Black, Hispanic, Asian/Pacific Islander, and American Indian/Alaskan Native, the ethnicity distribution includes a third category of employees who have voluntarily chosen not to self-identify by ethnicity and/or were not identified by other means. This category, defined as “Unknown,” is excluded from the analysis due to data quality standards and comprises a small fraction of the workforce.
NYC Population: data refers to civilian employed population aged 16 and over residing in New York City, as reported by the American Community Survey 2011.
Calculations: Figure 12: Fiscal 2012, Gender in NYC Municipal Workforce versus NYC Population
Figure 13: Fiscal 2012, Ethnicity in NYC Municipal Workforce versus NYC Population Show the percent of males and females as well as of ethnicities in different populations of interest in Fiscal 2012:
Figure 14: Fiscal 2012, Managerial Status by Gender
Figure 15: Fiscal 2012, Managerial Status by Ethnicity Show the percent of males and females as well as of ethnicities in managerial and non managerial status in Fiscal 2012.
New York City Government Workforce Profile Report 46
Figure 16: Fiscal 2012, Occupational Category by Gender- shows the percent of male and female active employees in fiscal 2012, and total number of employees in each Occupational Category, by Agency Figure 17: Fiscal 2012, Occupational Category by Ethnicity- shows the percent of ethnicities of active employees in fiscal 2012, and total number of employees in each Occupational Category, by Agency
Figure 18: Fiscal 2012, Agencies Grouped in Citywide Theme by Gender– shows the percent of males
and females of active employees in fiscal 2012, and total number of employees, by agency and occupational category Figure 19: Fiscal 2012, Agency Grouped in Citywide Theme by Ethnicity– shows the percent of ethnicities of active employees in fiscal 2012, and total number of employees, by agency and occupational category
Figure 20: Fiscal 2003 – Fiscal 2012, Gender- shows the percent of males and females of active
employees in each fiscal year from 2003 to 2012 Figure 21: Fiscal 2003 – Fiscal 2012, Ethnicity- shows the percent of race/ethnicities of active employees in each fiscal year from 2003 to 2012
New York City Government Workforce Profile Report 47
Section 6 – Salary Sources:
Payroll Management System (PMS) Data was also provided by HHC and SCA. Consumer Price Index – All Urban Consumers of the Bureau of Labor Statistics New York City Office of Management and Budget, Adopted Budget - Expense
Definitions: Salary Type
Annual: An employee who is paid a wage that is based on a predetermined amount and requires the employee to work a certain number of hours.
Hourly: An employee who is paid a wage that is based on the number of hours the employee works.
Daily: An employee who is paid on a per day (work day) basis. Per session: An employee who is paid on a per session basis.
Salaries that could not be related to any of the above categories (for example trainees, on volunteer and near-volunteer basis) have been excluded from the analysis.
Salary Conversion Salaries have been adjusted to hourly using the following conversions: Annual salary divided by number of hours worked by Collective Bargaining Unit (CBU) and
agency: provided by the Office of Management and Budget For unmatched CBU numbers and agencies, annual salary divided by 1,900: weighted average
of hours worked annually by employees in different statuses Daily salary divided by 7.3076923: weighted average of hours worked daily by employees in
different statuses Per session salaries have not been converted into hourly, as information on the number of
hours worked might not be available. Therefore, for the purposes of the calculations described in this report, salaries expressed in per session rates were excluded.
Personnel Expense Budget
Salaries and Wages: monetary compensation paid to employees. Pensions and Fringe Benefits: monetary compensation which is indirectly given to the employee through healthcare, retirement benefits and other benefits.
Calculations: Figure 22: Fiscal 2012, Annual Full-time Base Salary Distribution – shows the percentage of active Full-
time employees in each salary bracket in fiscal year 2012.
New York City Government Workforce Profile Report 48
Figure 23: Fiscal 2003 – Fiscal 2012, Full-time Employees Annual Base Salary - Adjusted for Inflation- shows the distribution (5th percentile, Median, 95th percentile) of Annual base salaries for active full time employees from fiscal year 2003 to fiscal year 2012. All values have been adjusted for inflation.
Figure 24: Fiscal 2003 – Fiscal 2012, Personnel Expenses and Median Annual Salary – shows the dollar amount of City budget spent on personnel expenses each year from fiscal year 2003 to fiscal year 2012 in nominal dollars (unadjusted for inflation); the trend line shows the median annual base salary in real dollars (adjusted for inflation) for active full time employees for the same fiscal years.
Figure 25: Fiscal 2003 – Fiscal 2012, Median Annual Base Salary by Occupational Category – Adjusted
for Inflation – shows the median annual salary for active full time employees in each occupational category, from fiscal year 2003 to fiscal year 2012. All values have been adjusted for inflation.
New York City Government Workforce Profile Report 49
Section 7 – Attrition Sources:
Payroll Management System (PMS) Citywide Equal Employment Database System (CEEDS) Data was also provided by HHC and SCA.
Definitions: Dismissal: Involuntary termination of an employee. Separation of Temporary Workers: Dismissal due to a seasonal or limited duration position Layoff: Involuntary termination of an employee due to staff reductions for operational or budgetary
reasons. Resignation: Voluntary departure of an employee other than by retirement. Retirement: Voluntary separation of employee who left the City stating reason due to retirement. Death: Employee dies while being employed by the City.
Calculations: Figure 26: Fiscal 2012, Citywide Attrition – shows number of Full-time and Part-time employees who
left NYC Government in fiscal year 2012 for any reason. It also shows median age, median years of services and median hourly salary (for median hourly salary calculation methodology see Section 6 – Salary conversion) for each category of attrition.
Figure 27: Fiscal 2003 – Fiscal 2012, Separation Reasons – shows the total number of employees who
in a given fiscal year left the City for different reasons, from fiscal year 2003 to 2012.
Figure 28: Fiscal 2003 – Fiscal 2012, Attrition by Gender – shows the percents of males and females
out of the total number of employees who in a given fiscal year left the City for any reason, from fiscal year 2003 to 2012.
New York City Government Workforce Profile Report 50
Figure 29: Fiscal 2003 – Fiscal 2012, Attrition by Ethnicity – shows the percent of employees in each Ethnicity group out of the total number of employees who in a given fiscal year left the City for any reason, from fiscal year 2003 to 2012.
New York City Government Workforce Profile Report 51
Section 8 - Retirement Sources:
Payroll Management System (PMS) Citywide Equal Employment Database System (CEEDS) NYC Employee Retirement System (NYCERS) Teachers’ Retirement System (TRS) Board of Education Retirement System (BERS) Data was also provided by HHC and SCA.
Definitions: Eligible in 2012: an employee who is part of a pension tier and is fully vested in the pension, meaning
they could retire today with full pension benefits.
Eligible 2013–2017: an employee who is part of a pension tier and will be fully vested in the pension in the next 5 years, meaning they could retire in any year between 2013 and 2017 with full pension benefits.
Not Eligible by 2017: an employee who is part of a pension tier, but will not be fully vested in the pension from 2012-2017, meaning they could not retire before 2017 with full pension benefits.
No Current Pension Membership: an employee who is not part of a pension tier.
Calculations: Figure 30: Fiscal 2012, Retirement Eligibility – shows the percent of Full-time employees who are
eligible to retire in 2012, from 2013 to 2017, those with no current pension membership and those not eligible to retire by fiscal year 2017.
Figure 31: Fiscal 2012, Retirement Eligibility by Occupational Group – shows percent of Full-time employees who are eligible to retire in 2012 and from 2013 to 2017 by occupational group.
New York City Government Workforce Profile Report 52
Figure 32: Fiscal 2003 – Fiscal 2012, Retirement Eligibility versus Actual – shows percent of Full-time employees eligible to retire in each fiscal year, and the percent of full-time employees who retired in that fiscal year, from fiscal year 2003 to 2012.
Figure 33: Fiscal 2003 – Fiscal 2012, Retirement by Occupational Category – shows percent of
employees eligible to retire in each fiscal year, and the number of full-time employees who retired in that fiscal year by Occupational Category, from fiscal year 2003 to 2012.
Figure 34: Fiscal 2003 – Fiscal 2012, Retirement Eligibility – for each fiscal year, shows the percent of
employees who are eligible to retire in that year, eligible to retire within five years, not currently a pension member, or ineligible to retire.
New York City Government Workforce Profile Report 53
Section 9 – New Hires Sources:
Payroll Management System (PMS) Data was also provided by HHC and SCA.
Definitions: New Hire: an employee hired by the City who has never worked for a City agency before, or whose
previous job was not with the City but has in the past worked for the City, or who is currently working for the City, but is moving from one agency to another.
Calculations: Figure 35: Fiscal 2003 versus Fiscal 2012, New Hires, Nominal Dollars – for fiscal year 2003 and 2012,
shows number of employees in any of the categories above. It also shows median age and median hourly salary (for median hourly salary calculation methodology see Section 6 – Salary conversion).
Figure 36: Fiscal 2003 – Fiscal 2012, New Hires by Gender – Shows the percent of males and females
who were hired in a given fiscal year, from fiscal year 2003 to 2012.
Figure 37: Fiscal 2003 – Fiscal 2012, New Hires by Ethnicity – shows the percent of employees in each
ethnicity group hired in a given fiscal year, from fiscal year 2003 to 2012 (for ethnicity definitions, see Section 4: Gender and Ethnicity).
Figure 38: Fiscal 2012, % Attrition versus New Hires by Agency – shows the percent of employees who
were hired and who left City government as a percentage of the total number of employees in each agency, in fiscal year 2012.
New York City Government Workforce Profile Report 54
Section 10 – Employee Titles Sources:
Payroll Management System (PMS) Data was also provided by HHC and SCA
Calculations: Figure 39: Fiscal 2012, titles with 1,000 or More Full-time Employees – Shows titles with 1,000 or more
Full-time employees across the City in fiscal 2012, with metrics on percent share of total Citywide Full-time employees, median age, years of service, percent eligible to retire, attrition and new hire rate.
Figure 40: Attrition Information by Employee Title – shows titles experiencing the highest yearly attrition as an average of fiscal years 2008 to 2012, with metrics on percent share of total Citywide attrition, percent of workforce in job title, median age, and years of service, based on indicated time period.
Figure 41: New Hire Information by Employee Title – shows titles experiencing the highest yearly new-hiring as an average of fiscal years 2008 to 2012, with metrics on percent share of total Citywide attrition, percent of workforce in job title, median age, and years of service, based on indicated time period.
New York City Government Workforce Profile Report 55
Section 11 – Employee Representation Sources:
Payroll Management System (PMS) Data was also provided by HHC and SCA
Definitions: Union Representation: employees eligible for collective bargaining. Pending: employees awaiting union certification by the NYC Office of Collective Bargaining. Non-union: employees that are excluded by law from collective bargaining (mostly managerial and
confidential employees). Calculations: Figure 42: Fiscal 2003 – Fiscal 2012, Union Representation – Shows status of all active employees in
relation to union representation.
New York City Government Workforce Profile Report 56
Appendix B: Workforce by Agency
Administration for Children's Services……………………………............................................ 57 Business Integrity Commission……………………………...................................................... 58 Civilian Complaint Review Board……………………………................................................... 59 Commission on Human Rights……………………………....................................................... 60 Department for the Aging……………………………............................................................... 61 Department of Buildings……………………………................................................................. 62 Department of City Planning……………………………........................................................... 63 Department of Citywide Administrative Services……………………………............................ 64 Department of Consumer Affairs…………………………….................................................... 65 Department of Correction……………………………............................................................... 66 Department of Cultural Affairs……………………………........................................................ 67 Department of Design and Construction……………………………........................................ 68 Department of Education……………………………................................................................ 69 Department of Environmental Protection………...…………………........................................ 70 Department of Finance……………………………................................................................... 71 Department of Health and Mental Hygiene…………………………….................................... 71 Department of Homeless Services……………………………................................................. 72 Department of Housing Preservation and Development……………………………................ 73 Department of Information Technology and Telecommunications……………………………. 74 Department of Investigation…………………………............................................................ 75 Department of Parks and Recreation……………………………............................................ 76 Department of Probation……………………………................................................................ 77 Department of Records and Information Services…………………………….......................... 78 Department of Sanitation……………………………............................................................... 79 Department of Small Business Services………...……………………........................................ 80 Department of Transportation……………………………........................................................ 81 Department of Youth and Community Development …………………………….................... 82 Fire Department…………………………….............................................................................. 83 Health and Hospitals Corporation……………………………................................................... 84 Human Resources Administration…………………………….................................................. 85 Landmarks Preservation Commission……………………………............................................ 86 Law Department…………………………….............................................................................. 87 Mayoralty……………………………........................................................................................ 88 New York City Housing Authority……………………………................................................... 89 Office of Administrative Trials and Hearings…………………………….................................. 90 Office of Emergency Management……………………………................................................. 91 Police Department…………………………….......................................................................... 92 School Construction Authority……………………………........................................................ 93 Taxi and Limousine Commission…………………………….................................................... 94
IIndi
cato
rA
CSCi
tyw
ide
Hea
dcou
nt (F
T / F
TE)
6,15
2 / 4
430
4,06
6 / 2
3,72
7
Med
ian
Age
/ Yea
rs o
f Ser
vice
46.6
/ 12
45.2
/ 11
.1
% M
ale
/ Fem
ale
27%
/ 73
%43
% /
57%
% W
hite
/ M
inor
ity14
% /
86%
39%
/ 61
%
Med
ian
Annu
al F
T Ba
se S
alar
y$4
9,60
6$6
5,29
9
% A
ttriti
on7%
6%
% E
ligib
le to
Ret
ire27
%19
%
% N
ew H
ires
6%5%
% U
nion
Rep
rese
nted
91%
93%
ACS
City
wid
e
AACS
ACS
City
wid
e
## in
Age
ncy
% o
f Age
ncy
% o
f City
wid
eM
edia
n Ye
ars
of S
ervi
ce%
Ret
irem
ent
Elig
ible
% A
ttriti
on R
ate
% N
ew
Hire
s
1,87
530
.3%
100.
0%5.
47.
1%6.
8%9.
4%
546
8.8%
100.
0%17
.633
.2%
2.8%
0.0%
330
5.3%
100.
0%7.
615
.8%
14.7
%14
.7%
258
4.2%
100.
0%22
.453
.5%
5.5%
0.0%
255
4.1%
5.8%
23.5
53.7
%5.
9%0.
0%
244
3.9%
5.7%
15.3
46.3
%6.
9%0.
0%
218
3.5%
100.
0%21
.637
.2%
4.0%
0.4%
211
3.4%
33.2
%5.
18.
1%10
.8%
7.5%
211
3.4%
8.9%
19.4
47.9
%2.
8%2.
8%
178
2.9%
100.
0%22
.735
.4%
2.2%
0.0%
Stat
us#
in A
genc
y%
of A
genc
yM
edia
n Ag
eM
edia
n Ye
ars
of S
ervi
ce%
Elig
ible
(2
012)
% E
ligib
le
(201
3 -
2017
)#
Elig
. (2
012
- 20
17)
New
Hire
s39
86.
1%31
.80.
550
.4%
22.2
%39
5
Dec
ease
d12
0.2%
53.2
21.8
39.6
%23
.4%
414
Dism
issal
s66
1.0%
40.8
3.8
24.2
%15
.8%
114
Layo
ffs7
0.1%
50.4
18.1
23.1
%16
.7%
1,70
1
Resig
ned
203
3.1%
34.6
4.0
8.5%
42.9
%97
Retir
emen
t13
42.
1%63
.325
.038
.8%
18.4
%28
Sepa
ratio
n of
Tem
p. W
orke
rs0
0.0%
N/A
N/A
55.6
%33
.3%
8
N/A
N/A
N/A
8.9%
15.6
%11
City
wid
e
Adm
inist
ratio
n fo
r Chi
ldre
n's
Serv
ices
: FY1
2
Med
ian
Age
Wor
kfor
ce P
rofil
e
Th
e Ad
min
istra
tion
for C
hild
ren'
s Ser
vices
(ACS
) is r
espo
nsib
le fo
r pro
tect
ing
and
stre
ngth
enin
g th
e Ci
ty’s
child
ren,
you
th, a
nd fa
milie
s by
prov
idin
g qu
ality
chi
ld w
elfa
re, j
uven
ile ju
stice
, ear
ly ca
re a
nd e
duca
tion
serv
ices.
Empl
oyee
Typ
e
34.8
48.5
45.1
54.4
52.3
51.9
49.4
34.2
51.8
49.8
Activ
ity S
tatu
sRe
tirem
ent E
ligib
ility
Skille
d Cr
aft W
orke
rs
Teac
hers
Tech
nici
ans
Cate
gorie
s
Adm
inist
rativ
e Su
ppor
t
Offi
cial
s an
d Ad
min
istra
tors
Para
prof
essio
nals
Prof
essio
nals
N
/A a
ppea
rs w
here
the
popu
latio
n ha
s fe
wer
than
5 e
mpl
oyee
s or
ther
e ar
e no
reco
rds
avai
labl
e, a
nd th
eref
ore,
no
calc
ulat
ions
wer
e m
ade.
Dem
ogra
phic
s Full-
Tim
e Em
ploy
ee T
itle
Child
Pro
tect
ive
Spec
ialis
t
Child
Pro
tect
ive
Spec
ialis
t Sup
ervi
sor
Juve
nile
Cou
nsel
or
Child
Wel
fare
Spe
cial
ist
Prin
cipa
l Adm
inist
rativ
e As
soci
ate
Cler
ical
Ass
ocia
te
Child
and
Fam
ily S
peci
alist
Agen
cy A
ttorn
ey
Adm
inist
rativ
e St
aff A
naly
st
Dire
ctor
of F
ield
Ope
ratio
ns
Top
10 M
ost P
opul
ous
Full-
Tim
e Ti
tles
Prot
ectiv
e Se
rvic
e W
orke
rs
Serv
ice
Mai
nten
ance
$89
,500
$10
3,65
1
$35
,285
$
31,8
28
$49
,606
$65
,299
ACS
City
wid
e
Ann
ual F
T Sa
lary
73%
57
%
27%
43
%
ACS
City
wid
e
Gen
der
Fem
ale
Mal
e
87%
6% 7%
Ac
tive
New
Hire
sAt
tritio
n89
%
5% 6%
74%
13%
14%
Pe
rman
ent
Prov
ision
al
62%
7%
31%
100%
0%
Civil
ian
Unifo
rm
82%
18%
99%
1%
Full-
time
FTE
14%
39%
67%
32%
14%
20%
4%
8%
ACS
City
wid
e
Ethn
icity
W
hite
Blac
kH
ispan
icAs
ian/
Pacif
ic Is
land
erAm
. Ind
ian/
Ala
skan
Nat
ive
93%
7%
22%
20%
18%
10%
18%
9%
2%
1%
1%
0 to
4
5 to
9
10 to
14
15 to
19
20 to
24
25 to
29
30 to
34
35 to
40
40
+
22%
23%
19%
12%
12%
7%
3%
1%
0%
Year
s of S
ervic
e
0%
1%
13%
14%
12%
17%
17%
14%
8%
4%
<
20
20 to
24
30 to
34
35 to
39
40 to
44
45 to
49
50 to
54
55 to
59
60 to
64
6
5+
1%
2%
13%
13%
15%
15%
15%
13%
8%
4%
Age
Agen
cy O
verv
iew
:
5th
to 9
5th
Perc
entil
e M
edia
n
Not
es:
57
IIndi
cato
rBI
CCi
tyw
ide
Hea
dcou
nt (F
T / F
TE)
71 /
130
4,06
6 / 2
3,72
7
Med
ian
Age
/ Yea
rs o
f Ser
vice
43.7
/ 9.
745
.2 /
11.1
% M
ale
/ Fem
ale
57%
/ 43
%43
% /
57%
% W
hite
/ M
inor
ity35
% /
65%
39%
/ 61
%
Med
ian
Annu
al F
T Ba
se S
alar
y$5
1,91
2$6
5,29
9
% A
ttriti
on22
%6%
% E
ligib
le to
Ret
ire21
%19
%
% N
ew H
ires
9%5%
% U
nion
Rep
rese
nted
69%
93%
BIC
City
wid
e
BBIC
BIC
City
wid
e
## in
Age
ncy
% o
f Age
ncy
% o
f City
wid
eM
edia
n Ye
ars
of S
ervi
ce%
Ret
irem
ent
Elig
ible
% A
ttriti
on R
ate
% N
ew
Hire
s
1622
.2%
100.
0%14
.66.
3%15
.8%
10.5
%
1419
.4%
0.6%
2.6
7.1%
41.7
%16
.7%
912
.5%
0.4%
9.8
22.2
%10
.0%
10.0
%
68.
3%2.
0%3.
916
.7%
11.1
%0.
0%
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Stat
us#
in A
genc
y%
of A
genc
yM
edia
n Ag
eM
edia
n Ye
ars
of S
ervi
ce%
Elig
ible
(2
012)
% E
ligib
le
(201
3 -
2017
)#
Elig
. (2
012
- 20
17)
New
Hire
s8
9.2%
29.1
0.9
50.0
%16
.7%
4
Dec
ease
d1
1.1%
N/A
N/A
20.0
%5.
0%5
Dism
issal
s1
1.1%
N/A
N/A
6.7%
6.7%
2
Layo
ffs0
0.0%
N/A
N/A
9.5%
19.0
%6
Resig
ned
1517
.2%
28.9
2.8
N/A
N/A
N/A
Retir
emen
t2
2.3%
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Sepa
ratio
n of
Tem
p. W
orke
rs0
0.0%
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
66.7
%16
.7%
5
City
wid
e
Busin
ess
Inte
grity
Com
miss
ion:
FY1
2
Med
ian
Age
Wor
kfor
ce P
rofil
e
Th
e Bu
sines
s Int
egrit
y Co
mm
issio
n (B
IC) r
egul
ates
and
mon
itors
the
trade
was
te/c
omm
ercia
l car
ting
indu
stry
and
the
who
lesa
lers
and
bus
ines
ses o
pera
ting
in th
e Ci
ty's
publ
ic w
hole
sale
mar
kets
, and
ens
ures
the
inte
grity
of b
usin
esse
s in
thes
e in
dust
ries.
Empl
oyee
Typ
e
41.4
28.6
43.9
41.2
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Activ
ity S
tatu
sRe
tirem
ent E
ligib
ility
Skille
d Cr
aft W
orke
rs
Teac
hers
Tech
nici
ans
Cate
gorie
s
Adm
inist
rativ
e Su
ppor
t
Offi
cial
s an
d Ad
min
istra
tors
Para
prof
essio
nals
Prof
essio
nals
N
/A a
ppea
rs w
here
the
popu
latio
n ha
s fe
wer
than
5 e
mpl
oyee
s or
ther
e ar
e no
reco
rds
avai
labl
e, a
nd th
eref
ore,
no
calc
ulat
ions
wer
e m
ade.
Dem
ogra
phic
s Full-
Tim
e Em
ploy
ee T
itle
Mar
ket A
gent
Com
mun
ity A
ssoc
iate
Adm
inist
rativ
e St
aff A
naly
st
Exec
utiv
e Ag
ency
Cou
nsel
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Top
10 M
ost P
opul
ous
Full-
Tim
e Ti
tles
Prot
ectiv
e Se
rvic
e W
orke
rs
Serv
ice
Mai
nten
ance
$12
2,00
0
$10
3,65
1
$35
,000
$
31,8
28
$51
,912
$65
,299
BIC
City
wid
e
Ann
ual F
T Sa
lary
43%
57
%
57%
43
%
BIC
City
wid
e
Gen
der
Fem
ale
Mal
e
69%
9%
22%
Activ
eN
ew H
ires
Attri
tion
89%
5% 6%
35%
28
%
37%
Perm
anen
t
Prov
ision
al
62%
7%
31%
100%
0%
Civil
ian
Unifo
rm
82%
18%
99%
1%
Full-
time
FTE
35%
39
%
26%
32%
27%
20%
11%
8%
BIC
City
wid
e
Ethn
icity
W
hite
Blac
kH
ispan
icAs
ian/
Pacif
ic Is
land
erAm
. Ind
ian/
Ala
skan
Nat
ive
93%
7%
41%
10%
10%
19%
7%
7%
4%
0%
0%
0 to
4
5 to
9
10 to
14
15 to
19
20 to
24
25 to
29
30 to
34
35 to
40
40
+
22%
23%
19%
12%
12%
7%
3%
1%
0%
Year
s of S
ervic
e
0%
5%
3%
14%
28%
19%
14%
14%
2%
2%
<
20
20 to
24
30 to
34
35 to
39
40 to
44
45 to
49
50 to
54
55 to
59
60 to
64
6
5+
1%
2%
13%
13%
15%
15%
15%
13%
8%
4%
Age
Agen
cy O
verv
iew
:
5th
to 9
5th
Perc
entil
e M
edia
n
Not
es:
58
IIndi
cato
rCC
RBCi
tyw
ide
Hea
dcou
nt (F
T / F
TE)
120
/ 430
4,06
6 / 2
3,72
7
Med
ian
Age
/ Yea
rs o
f Ser
vice
30.4
/ 3.
945
.2 /
11.1
% M
ale
/ Fem
ale
47%
/ 53
%43
% /
57%
% W
hite
/ M
inor
ity38
% /
62%
39%
/ 61
%
Med
ian
Annu
al F
T Ba
se S
alar
y$4
9,04
5$6
5,29
9
% A
ttriti
on19
%6%
% E
ligib
le to
Ret
ire9%
19%
% N
ew H
ires
12%
5%
% U
nion
Rep
rese
nted
79%
93%
CCRB
City
wid
e
CCCRB
CCRB
City
wid
e
## in
Age
ncy
% o
f Age
ncy
% o
f City
wid
eM
edia
n Ye
ars
of S
ervi
ce%
Ret
irem
ent
Elig
ible
% A
ttriti
on R
ate
% N
ew
Hire
s
7963
.7%
100.
0%2.
71.
3%25
.5%
17.0
%
75.
6%10
0.0%
8.8
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
64.
8%10
0.0%
13.8
16.7
%0.
0%0.
0%
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Stat
us#
in A
genc
y%
of A
genc
yM
edia
n Ag
eM
edia
n Ye
ars
of S
ervi
ce%
Elig
ible
(2
012)
% E
ligib
le
(201
3 -
2017
)#
Elig
. (2
012
- 20
17)
New
Hire
s20
12.3
%26
.20.
242
.9%
28.6
%5
Dec
ease
d0
0.0%
N/A
N/A
20.6
%17
.6%
13
Dism
issal
s0
0.0%
N/A
N/A
0.0%
37.5
%3
Layo
ffs0
0.0%
N/A
N/A
50.0
%50
.0%
2
Resig
ned
2817
.3%
27.8
3.0
N/A
N/A
N/A
Retir
emen
t3
1.9%
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Sepa
ratio
n of
Tem
p. W
orke
rs0
0.0%
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1.3%
1.3%
2
City
wid
e
Civi
lian
Com
plai
nt R
evie
w B
oard
: FY1
2
Med
ian
Age
Wor
kfor
ce P
rofil
e
Th
e Ci
vilia
n Co
mpl
aint
Rev
iew
Boa
rd (C
CRB)
is a
n in
depe
nden
t, no
n-po
lice
agen
cy w
ith th
e au
thor
ity to
inve
stig
ate
alle
gatio
ns o
f pol
ice m
iscon
duct
and
to re
com
men
d ac
tion
dire
ctly
to th
e po
lice
com
miss
ione
r. Th
e Bo
ard
striv
es to
reso
lve c
ompl
aint
s effi
cient
ly th
roug
h in
vest
igat
ion
and
its m
edia
tion
prog
ram
, and
repo
rts o
n its
act
ivitie
s and
ach
ieve
men
ts tw
ice a
yea
r.
Empl
oyee
Typ
e
26.7
33.1
39.1
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Activ
ity S
tatu
sRe
tirem
ent E
ligib
ility
Skille
d Cr
aft W
orke
rs
Teac
hers
Tech
nici
ans
Cate
gorie
s
Adm
inist
rativ
e Su
ppor
t
Offi
cial
s an
d Ad
min
istra
tors
Para
prof
essio
nals
Prof
essio
nals
N
/A a
ppea
rs w
here
the
popu
latio
n ha
s fe
wer
than
5 e
mpl
oyee
s or
ther
e ar
e no
reco
rds
avai
labl
e, a
nd th
eref
ore,
no
calc
ulat
ions
wer
e m
ade.
Dem
ogra
phic
s Full-
Tim
e Em
ploy
ee T
itle
Inve
stig
ator
(CCR
B)
Supe
rviso
r of I
nves
tigat
ors
(CCR
B)
Inve
stig
ativ
e M
anag
er (C
CRB)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Top
10 M
ost P
opul
ous
Full-
Tim
e Ti
tles
Prot
ectiv
e Se
rvic
e W
orke
rs
Serv
ice
Mai
nten
ance
$97
,663
$
103,
651
$35
,660
$
31,8
28
$49
,045
$65
,299
CCRB
City
wid
e
Ann
ual F
T Sa
lary
53%
57
%
47%
43
%
CCRB
City
wid
e
Gen
der
Fem
ale
Mal
e
69%
12%
19
%
Activ
eN
ew H
ires
Attri
tion
89%
5% 6%
6%
5%
89%
Pe
rman
ent
Prov
ision
al
62%
7%
31%
100%
0%
Civil
ian
Unifo
rm
82%
18%
97%
3%
Full-
time
FTE
38%
39
%
32%
32
%
20%
20
%
10%
8%
CCRB
City
wid
e
Ethn
icity
W
hite
Blac
kH
ispan
icAs
ian/
Pacif
ic Is
land
erAm
. Ind
ian/
Ala
skan
Nat
ive
93%
7%
64%
17%
6%
4%
5%
3%
0%
0%
1%
0 to
4
5 to
9
10 to
14
15 to
19
20 to
24
25 to
29
30 to
34
35 to
40
40
+
22%
23%
19%
12%
12%
7%
3%
1%
0%
Year
s of S
ervic
e
0%
21%
19%
14%
15%
9%
6%
4%
8%
4%
<
20
20 to
24
30 to
34
35 to
39
40 to
44
45 to
49
50 to
54
55 to
59
60 to
64
6
5+
1%
2%
13%
13%
15%
15%
15%
13%
8%
4%
Age
Agen
cy O
verv
iew
:
5th
to 9
5th
Perc
entil
e M
edia
n
Not
es:
59
IIndi
cato
rH
RCCi
tyw
ide
Hea
dcou
nt (F
T / F
TE)
60 /
230
4,06
6 / 2
3,72
7
Med
ian
Age
/ Yea
rs o
f Ser
vice
55.5
/ 22
.245
.2 /
11.1
% M
ale
/ Fem
ale
49%
/ 51
%43
% /
57%
% W
hite
/ M
inor
ity34
% /
66%
39%
/ 61
%
Med
ian
Annu
al F
T Ba
se S
alar
y$5
9,85
0$6
5,29
9
% A
ttriti
on15
%6%
% E
ligib
le to
Ret
ire60
%19
%
% N
ew H
ires
0%5%
% U
nion
Rep
rese
nted
87%
93%
HRC
City
wid
e
HHRC
HRC
City
wid
e
## in
Age
ncy
% o
f Age
ncy
% o
f City
wid
eM
edia
n Ye
ars
of S
ervi
ce%
Ret
irem
ent
Elig
ible
% A
ttriti
on R
ate
% N
ew
Hire
s
1321
.0%
92.9
%30
.492
.3%
0.0%
0.0%
812
.9%
1.3%
6.2
12.5
%18
.2%
0.0%
711
.3%
100.
0%4.
828
.6%
0.0%
0.0%
69.
7%0.
1%26
.010
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Stat
us#
in A
genc
y%
of A
genc
yM
edia
n Ag
eM
edia
n Ye
ars
of S
ervi
ce%
Elig
ible
(2
012)
% E
ligib
le
(201
3 -
2017
)#
Elig
. (2
012
- 20
17)
New
Hire
s0
0.0%
N/A
N/A
90.0
%10
.0%
10
Dec
ease
d0
0.0%
N/A
N/A
57.1
%28
.6%
6
Dism
issal
s0
0.0%
N/A
N/A
0.0%
25.0
%1
Layo
ffs0
0.0%
N/A
N/A
59.5
%7.
1%28
Resig
ned
79.
5%30
.30.
9N
/AN
/AN
/A
Retir
emen
t4
5.4%
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Sepa
ratio
n of
Tem
p. W
orke
rs0
0.0%
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
City
wid
e
Com
miss
ion
on H
uman
Rig
hts:
FY12
Med
ian
Age
Wor
kfor
ce P
rofil
e
Th
e fu
nctio
ns o
f the
Com
miss
ion
on H
uman
Rig
hts (
CCH
R) a
re se
t for
th in
Titl
e 8
of th
e A
dmin
istra
tive
Code
of t
he C
ity o
f New
Yor
k, th
e H
uman
Rig
hts L
aw: t
o fo
ster
mut
ual u
nder
stan
ding
and
resp
ect a
mon
g al
l per
sons
in th
e Ci
ty o
f New
Yor
k an
d to
enc
oura
ge
equa
lity
of tr
eatm
ent f
or, a
nd p
reve
nt d
iscrim
inat
ion
agai
nst,
any
grou
p or
its m
embe
rs.
Empl
oyee
Typ
e
59.6
39.4
38.6
58.0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Activ
ity S
tatu
sRe
tirem
ent E
ligib
ility
Skille
d Cr
aft W
orke
rs
Teac
hers
Tech
nici
ans
Cate
gorie
s
Adm
inist
rativ
e Su
ppor
t
Offi
cial
s an
d Ad
min
istra
tors
Para
prof
essio
nals
Prof
essio
nals
N
/A a
ppea
rs w
here
the
popu
latio
n ha
s fe
wer
than
5 e
mpl
oyee
s or
ther
e ar
e no
reco
rds
avai
labl
e, a
nd th
eref
ore,
no
calc
ulat
ions
wer
e m
ade.
Dem
ogra
phic
s Full-
Tim
e Em
ploy
ee T
itle
Asso
ciat
e H
uman
Rig
hts
Spec
ialis
t
Agen
cy A
ttorn
ey
Hum
an R
ight
s Sp
ecia
list (
CCH
R)
Prin
cipa
l Adm
inist
rativ
e As
soci
ate
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Top
10 M
ost P
opul
ous
Full-
Tim
e Ti
tles
Prot
ectiv
e Se
rvic
e W
orke
rs
Serv
ice
Mai
nten
ance
$12
6,29
0
$10
3,65
1
$38
,298
$
31,8
28
$59
,850
$
65,2
99
HRC
City
wid
e
Ann
ual F
T Sa
lary
51%
57
%
49%
43
%
HRC
City
wid
e
Gen
der
Fem
ale
Mal
e
85%
0% 15
%
Activ
eN
ew H
ires
Attri
tion
89%
5% 6%
46%
13%
41%
Perm
anen
t
Prov
ision
al
62%
7%
31%
100%
0%
Civil
ian
Unifo
rm
82%
18%
97%
3%
Full-
time
FTE
34%
39
%
43%
32
%
20%
20%
4%
8%
HRC
City
wid
e
Ethn
icity
W
hite
Blac
kH
ispan
icAs
ian/
Pacif
ic Is
land
erAm
. Ind
ian/
Ala
skan
Nat
ive
93%
7%
19%
10%
3%
13%
22%
14%
16%
3%
0%
0 to
4
5 to
9
10 to
14
15 to
19
20 to
24
25 to
29
30 to
34
35 to
40
40
+
22%
23%
19%
12%
12%
7%
3%
1%
0%
Year
s of S
ervic
e
0%
3%
10%
5%
3%
10%
15%
30%
15%
10%
<
20
20 to
24
30 to
34
35 to
39
40 to
44
45 to
49
50 to
54
55 to
59
60 to
64
6
5+
1%
2%
13%
13%
15%
15%
15%
13%
8%
4%
Age
Agen
cy O
verv
iew
:
5th
to 9
5th
Perc
entil
e M
edia
n
Not
es:
60
IIndi
cato
rD
FTA
City
wid
e
Hea
dcou
nt (F
T / F
TE)
286
/ 547
304,
066
/ 23,
727
Med
ian
Age
/ Yea
rs o
f Ser
vice
66.7
/ 4
45.2
/ 11
.1
% M
ale
/ Fem
ale
26%
/ 74
%43
% /
57%
% W
hite
/ M
inor
ity16
% /
84%
39%
/ 61
%
Med
ian
Annu
al F
T Ba
se S
alar
y$5
5,45
3$6
5,29
9
% A
ttriti
on23
%6%
% E
ligib
le to
Ret
ire12
%19
%
% N
ew H
ires
5%5%
% U
nion
Rep
rese
nted
21%
93%
DFT
ACi
tyw
ide
DDFT
A
DFT
ACi
tyw
ide
## in
Age
ncy
% o
f Age
ncy
% o
f City
wid
eM
edia
n Ye
ars
of S
ervi
ce%
Ret
irem
ent
Elig
ible
% A
ttriti
on R
ate
% N
ew
Hire
s
445.
3%10
0.0%
13.0
50.0
%2.
2%0.
0%
414.
9%1.
7%10
.134
.1%
0.0%
0.0%
334.
0%3.
0%11
.736
.4%
7.9%
2.6%
313.
7%1.
3%14
.448
.4%
2.8%
8.3%
273.
2%0.
6%26
.574
.1%
6.9%
0.0%
131.
6%10
0.0%
8.6
30.8
%0.
0%0.
0%
111.
3%8.
5%13
.427
.3%
0.0%
0.0%
101.
2%0.
9%20
.070
.0%
15.4
%0.
0%
91.
1%10
0.0%
23.3
88.9
%25
.0%
0.0%
70.
8%0.
9%8.
128
.6%
0.0%
0.0%
Stat
us#
in A
genc
y%
of A
genc
yM
edia
n Ag
eM
edia
n Ye
ars
of S
ervi
ce%
Elig
ible
(2
012)
% E
ligib
le
(201
3 -
2017
)#
Elig
. (2
012
- 20
17)
New
Hire
s82
5.1%
63.9
0.2
63.0
%16
.7%
43
Dec
ease
d2
0.1%
N/A
N/A
41.3
%15
.9%
36
Dism
issal
s12
98.
0%62
.20.
94.
4%4.
2%88
Layo
ffs0
0.0%
N/A
N/A
50.0
%18
.5%
63
Resig
ned
229
14.2
%68
.11.
8N
/AN
/AN
/A
Retir
emen
t12
0.7%
66.6
25.6
100.
0%0.
0%1
Sepa
ratio
n of
Tem
p. W
orke
rs0
0.0%
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
DFT
A ad
min
ister
s a
"Fos
ter G
rand
pare
nt P
rogr
am."
Par
t-tim
e vo
lunt
eers
of t
his
prog
ram
are
inclu
ded
in th
is an
alys
is, w
hich
may
influ
ence
the
inte
rpre
tatio
n of
the
data
abo
ve.
City
wid
e
Dep
artm
ent f
or th
e Ag
ing:
FY1
2
Med
ian
Age
Wor
kfor
ce P
rofil
e
Th
e D
epar
tmen
t for
the
Agin
g (D
FTA)
pro
mot
es, a
dmin
ister
s and
coo
rdin
ates
the
deve
lopm
ent a
nd p
rovis
ion
of se
rvice
s for
old
er N
ew Y
orke
rs to
hel
p th
em m
aint
ain
thei
r ind
epen
denc
e an
d pa
rticip
atio
n in
thei
r com
mun
ities
. The
Dep
artm
ent s
uppo
rts a
bro
ad ra
nge
of
serv
ices,
both
dire
ctly
and
thro
ugh
appr
oxim
atel
y ov
er 7
00 c
ontra
cts w
hich
inclu
de d
iscre
tiona
ry fu
nds w
ith c
omm
unity
-bas
ed o
rgan
izat
ions
.
Empl
oyee
Typ
e
55.1
50.1
55.9
51.7
55.4
49.2
50.5
60.4
61.8
50.2
Activ
ity S
tatu
sRe
tirem
ent E
ligib
ility
Skille
d Cr
aft W
orke
rs
Teac
hers
Tech
nici
ans
Cate
gorie
s
Adm
inist
rativ
e Su
ppor
t
Offi
cial
s an
d Ad
min
istra
tors
Para
prof
essio
nals
Prof
essio
nals
N
/A a
ppea
rs w
here
the
popu
latio
n ha
s fe
wer
than
5 e
mpl
oyee
s or
ther
e ar
e no
reco
rds
avai
labl
e, a
nd th
eref
ore,
no
calc
ulat
ions
wer
e m
ade.
Dem
ogra
phic
s Full-
Tim
e Em
ploy
ee T
itle
Prog
ram
Offi
cer (
DFT
A)
Com
mun
ity A
ssoc
iate
Com
mun
ity C
oord
inat
or
Adm
inist
rativ
e St
aff A
naly
st
Prin
cipa
l Adm
inist
rativ
e As
soci
ate
Adm
inist
rativ
e Pr
ogra
m O
ffice
r (D
FTA)
Man
agem
ent A
udito
r
Secr
etar
y
Nut
ritio
n Co
nsul
tant
Com
mun
ity A
ssist
ant
Top
10 M
ost P
opul
ous
Full-
Tim
e Ti
tles
Prot
ectiv
e Se
rvic
e W
orke
rs
Serv
ice
Mai
nten
ance
$11
3,42
9
$10
3,65
1
$35
,735
$
31,8
28
$55
,453
$
65,2
99
DFT
ACi
tyw
ide
Ann
ual F
T Sa
lary
74%
57
%
26%
43
%
DFT
ACi
tyw
ide
Gen
der
Fem
ale
Mal
e
72%
5%
23%
Activ
eN
ew H
ires
Attri
tion
89%
5% 6%
10%
49%
41%
Perm
anen
t
Prov
ision
al
62%
7%
31%
100%
0%
Civil
ian
Unifo
rm
82%
18%
34%
66%
Fu
ll-tim
eFT
E
16%
39%
45%
32%
22%
20%
17%
8%
DFT
ACi
tyw
ide
Ethn
icity
W
hite
Blac
kH
ispan
icAs
ian/
Pacif
ic Is
land
erAm
. Ind
ian/
Ala
skan
Nat
ive
93%
7%
55%
21%
11%
4%
3%
3%
2%
0%
0%
0 to
4
5 to
9
10 to
14
15 to
19
20 to
24
25 to
29
30 to
34
35 to
40
40
+
22%
23%
19%
12%
12%
7%
3%
1%
0%
Year
s of S
ervic
e
0%
0%
1%
2%
2%
3%
4%
10%
19%
57%
<
20
20 to
24
30 to
34
35 to
39
40 to
44
45 to
49
50 to
54
55 to
59
60 to
64
6
5+
1%
2%
13%
13%
15%
15%
15%
13%
8%
4%
Age
Agen
cy O
verv
iew
:
5th
to 9
5th
Perc
entil
e M
edia
n
Not
es:
61
IIndi
cato
rD
OB
City
wid
e
Hea
dcou
nt (F
T / F
TE)
1,05
1 / 1
630
4,06
6 / 2
3,72
7
Med
ian
Age
/ Yea
rs o
f Ser
vice
49.6
/ 9
45.2
/ 11
.1
% M
ale
/ Fem
ale
63%
/ 37
%43
% /
57%
% W
hite
/ M
inor
ity42
% /
58%
39%
/ 61
%
Med
ian
Annu
al F
T Ba
se S
alar
y$6
2,41
3$6
5,29
9
% A
ttriti
on7%
6%
% E
ligib
le to
Ret
ire30
%19
%
% N
ew H
ires
4%5%
% U
nion
Rep
rese
nted
83%
93%
DO
BCi
tyw
ide
DDO
B
DO
BCi
tyw
ide
## in
Age
ncy
% o
f Age
ncy
% o
f City
wid
eM
edia
n Ye
ars
of S
ervi
ce%
Ret
irem
ent
Elig
ible
% A
ttriti
on R
ate
% N
ew
Hire
s
129
12.1
%62
.6%
4.4
13.2
%5.
8%27
.0%
117
11.0
%99
.2%
10.2
35.0
%2.
5%0.
0%
969.
0%2.
2%12
.932
.3%
9.3%
3.7%
918.
5%13
.3%
10.9
26.4
%1.
1%0.
0%
757.
0%1.
8%7.
932
.0%
5.0%
0.0%
484.
5%2.
0%9.
522
.9%
11.1
%1.
9%
444.
1%1.
8%7.
627
.3%
0.0%
0.0%
333.
1%10
0.0%
13.7
48.5
%0.
0%0.
0%
292.
7%4.
6%7.
63.
4%0.
0%0.
0%
242.
2%96
.0%
11.5
41.7
%7.
7%0.
0%
Stat
us#
in A
genc
y%
of A
genc
yM
edia
n Ag
eM
edia
n Ye
ars
of S
ervi
ce%
Elig
ible
(2
012)
% E
ligib
le
(201
3 -
2017
)#
Elig
. (2
012
- 20
17)
New
Hire
s48
4.2%
44.5
0.3
32.6
%17
.1%
96
Dec
ease
d0
0.0%
N/A
N/A
36.7
%22
.8%
94
Dism
issal
s15
1.3%
30.2
6.0
20.5
%3.
6%20
Layo
ffs11
1.0%
50.4
4.4
29.1
%21
.7%
314
Resig
ned
262.
3%32
.14.
1N
/AN
/AN
/A
Retir
emen
t22
1.9%
65.4
22.7
N/A
N/A
N/A
Sepa
ratio
n of
Tem
p. W
orke
rs0
0.0%
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
50.0
%0.
0%2
City
wid
e
Dep
artm
ent o
f Bui
ldin
gs: F
Y12
Med
ian
Age
Wor
kfor
ce P
rofil
e
Th
e D
epar
tmen
t of B
uild
ings
(DO
B) e
nsur
es th
e sa
fe a
nd la
wfu
l use
of m
ore
than
975
,000
bui
ldin
gs a
nd p
rope
rties
by
enfo
rcin
g th
e Ci
ty’s
Build
ing
Code
, Zon
ing
Reso
lutio
n, N
ew Y
ork
Stat
e La
bor L
aw a
nd N
ew Y
ork
Stat
e M
ultip
le D
wel
ling
Law
. Th
e D
epar
tmen
t enf
orce
s co
mpl
ianc
e w
ith th
ese
regu
latio
ns a
nd p
rom
otes
wor
kers
and
pub
lic sa
fety
thro
ugh
its re
view
and
app
rova
l of b
uild
ing
plan
s, pe
rmitt
ing
and
licen
sing
func
tions
, and
insp
ectio
ns
Empl
oyee
Typ
e
50.1
52.8
47.5
43.1
44.4
48.0
44.8
55.5
37.0
56.9
Activ
ity S
tatu
sRe
tirem
ent E
ligib
ility
Skille
d Cr
aft W
orke
rs
Teac
hers
Tech
nici
ans
Cate
gorie
s
Adm
inist
rativ
e Su
ppor
t
Offi
cial
s an
d Ad
min
istra
tors
Para
prof
essio
nals
Prof
essio
nals
N
/A a
ppea
rs w
here
the
popu
latio
n ha
s fe
wer
than
5 e
mpl
oyee
s or
ther
e ar
e no
reco
rds
avai
labl
e, a
nd th
eref
ore,
no
calc
ulat
ions
wer
e m
ade.
Dem
ogra
phic
s Full-
Tim
e Em
ploy
ee T
itle
Insp
ecto
r
Asso
ciat
e In
spec
tor (
Cons
truct
ion)
Prin
cipa
l Adm
inist
rativ
e As
soci
ate
Adm
inist
rativ
e M
anag
er
Cler
ical
Ass
ocia
te
Adm
inist
rativ
e St
aff A
naly
st
Com
mun
ity A
ssoc
iate
Adm
inist
rativ
e In
spec
tor (
Build
ings
)
Agen
cy A
ttorn
ey
Asso
ciat
e In
spec
tor (
Elev
ator
)
Top
10 M
ost P
opul
ous
Full-
Tim
e Ti
tles
Prot
ectiv
e Se
rvic
e W
orke
rs
Serv
ice
Mai
nten
ance
$11
1,44
1
$10
3,65
1
$35
,573
$
31,8
28
$62
,413
$
65,2
99
DO
BCi
tyw
ide
Ann
ual F
T Sa
lary
37%
57
%
63%
43
%
DO
BCi
tyw
ide
Gen
der
Fem
ale
Mal
e
89%
4% 7%
Ac
tive
New
Hire
sAt
tritio
n89
%
5% 6%
37%
47%
16%
Pe
rman
ent
Prov
ision
al
62%
7%
31%
100%
0%
Civil
ian
Unifo
rm
82%
18%
99%
1%
Full-
time
FTE
42%
39
%
34%
32
%
13%
20
%
11%
8%
DO
BCi
tyw
ide
Ethn
icity
W
hite
Blac
kH
ispan
icAs
ian/
Pacif
ic Is
land
erAm
. Ind
ian/
Ala
skan
Nat
ive
93%
7%
22%
34%
18%
6%
9%
7%
3%
1%
0%
0 to
4
5 to
9
10 to
14
15 to
19
20 to
24
25 to
29
30 to
34
35 to
40
40
+
22%
23%
19%
12%
12%
7%
3%
1%
0%
Year
s of S
ervic
e
0%
1%
11%
10%
12%
15%
17%
16%
11%
7%
<
20
20 to
24
30 to
34
35 to
39
40 to
44
45 to
49
50 to
54
55 to
59
60 to
64
6
5+
1%
2%
13%
13%
15%
15%
15%
13%
8%
4%
Age
Agen
cy O
verv
iew
:
5th
to 9
5th
Perc
entil
e M
edia
n
Not
es:
62
IIndi
cato
rD
CPCi
tyw
ide
Hea
dcou
nt (F
T / F
TE)
225
/ 28
304,
066
/ 23,
727
Med
ian
Age
/ Yea
rs o
f Ser
vice
49.9
/ 12
.645
.2 /
11.1
% M
ale
/ Fem
ale
46%
/ 53
%43
% /
57%
% W
hite
/ M
inor
ity58
% /
42%
39%
/ 61
%
Med
ian
Annu
al F
T Ba
se S
alar
y$7
1,42
1$6
5,29
9
% A
ttriti
on8%
6%
% E
ligib
le to
Ret
ire39
%19
%
% N
ew H
ires
5%5%
% U
nion
Rep
rese
nted
76%
93%
DCP
City
wid
e
DDCP
DCP
City
wid
e
## in
Age
ncy
% o
f Age
ncy
% o
f City
wid
eM
edia
n Ye
ars
of S
ervi
ce%
Ret
irem
ent
Elig
ible
% A
ttriti
on R
ate
% N
ew
Hire
s
8634
.0%
33.5
%9.
729
.1%
7.3%
4.2%
3112
.3%
52.5
%12
.725
.8%
6.1%
0.0%
155.
9%0.
3%31
.586
.7%
11.1
%0.
0%
145.
5%1.
3%22
.671
.4%
5.9%
0.0%
104.
0%35
.7%
2.8
0.0%
11.8
%23
.5%
83.
2%0.
2%29
.087
.5%
10.0
%0.
0%
72.
8%26
.9%
7.5
28.6
%22
.2%
0.0%
62.
4%0.
3%9.
133
.3%
0.0%
16.7
%
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Stat
us#
in A
genc
y%
of A
genc
yM
edia
n Ag
eM
edia
n Ye
ars
of S
ervi
ce%
Elig
ible
(2
012)
% E
ligib
le
(201
3 -
2017
)#
Elig
. (2
012
- 20
17)
New
Hire
s14
5.1%
31.2
0.7
81.5
%14
.8%
26
Dec
ease
d1
0.4%
N/A
N/A
28.3
%25
.0%
32
Dism
issal
s1
0.4%
N/A
N/A
100.
0%0.
0%1
Layo
ffs0
0.0%
N/A
N/A
37.9
%11
.0%
71
Resig
ned
134.
7%35
.64.
9N
/AN
/AN
/A
Retir
emen
t8
2.9%
67.6
37.2
100.
0%0.
0%1
Sepa
ratio
n of
Tem
p. W
orke
rs0
0.0%
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
5.9%
5.9%
2
City
wid
e
Dep
artm
ent o
f City
Pla
nnin
g: F
Y12
Med
ian
Age
Wor
kfor
ce P
rofil
e
Th
e D
epar
tmen
t of C
ity P
lann
ing
(DCP
) pro
mot
es st
rate
gic
grow
th, t
rans
it-or
ient
ed d
evel
opm
ent a
nd su
stai
nabl
e co
mm
uniti
es to
enh
ance
qua
lity
of li
fe in
the
City
, in
part
by in
itiat
ing
com
preh
ensiv
e, c
onse
nsus
bas
ed p
lann
ing
and
zoni
ng c
hang
es fo
r ind
ividu
al
neig
hbor
hood
s and
bus
ines
s dist
ricts
, as w
ell a
s est
ablis
hing
pol
icies
and
zon
ing
regu
latio
ns a
pplic
able
city
wid
e. It
supp
orts
the
City
Pla
nnin
g Co
mm
issio
n an
d ea
ch y
ear r
evie
ws a
ppro
ximat
ely
450
land
use
app
licat
ions
for a
ctio
ns su
ch a
s zon
ing
chan
ges,
spec
ial p
erm
its a
nd o
ther
disc
retio
nary
ap
prov
als.
Empl
oyee
Typ
e
43.1
49.9
59.2
58.1
31.0
57.9
40.4
53.5
N/A
N/A
Activ
ity S
tatu
sRe
tirem
ent E
ligib
ility
Skille
d Cr
aft W
orke
rs
Teac
hers
Tech
nici
ans
Cate
gorie
s
Adm
inist
rativ
e Su
ppor
t
Offi
cial
s an
d Ad
min
istra
tors
Para
prof
essio
nals
Prof
essio
nals
N
/A a
ppea
rs w
here
the
popu
latio
n ha
s fe
wer
than
5 e
mpl
oyee
s or
ther
e ar
e no
reco
rds
avai
labl
e, a
nd th
eref
ore,
no
calc
ulat
ions
wer
e m
ade.
Dem
ogra
phic
s Full-
Tim
e Em
ploy
ee T
itle
City
Pla
nner
Adm
inist
rativ
e Ci
ty P
lann
er
Prin
cipa
l Adm
inist
rativ
e As
soci
ate
Com
pute
r Spe
cial
ist (S
oftw
are)
City
Pla
nnin
g Te
chni
cian
Cler
ical
Ass
ocia
te
Asso
ciat
e Ur
ban
Des
igne
r
Adm
inist
rativ
e St
aff A
naly
st
N/A
N/A
Top
10 M
ost P
opul
ous
Full-
Tim
e Ti
tles
Prot
ectiv
e Se
rvic
e W
orke
rs
Serv
ice
Mai
nten
ance
$11
3,00
0
$10
3,65
1
$46
,418
$31
,828
$71
,421
$
65,2
99
DCP
City
wid
e
Ann
ual F
T Sa
lary
53%
57
%
46%
43
%
DCP
City
wid
e
Gen
der
Fem
ale
Mal
e
87%
5% 8%
Activ
eN
ew H
ires
Attri
tion
89%
5% 6%
44%
46%
10
%
Perm
anen
t
Prov
ision
al
62%
7%
31%
100%
0%
Civil
ian
Unifo
rm
82%
18%
89%
11%
Fu
ll-tim
eFT
E
58%
39%
19%
32%
9%
20%
14%
8%
DCP
City
wid
e
Ethn
icity
W
hite
Blac
kH
ispan
icAs
ian/
Pacif
ic Is
land
erAm
. Ind
ian/
Ala
skan
Nat
ive
93%
7%
23%
19%
14%
4%
13%
13%
8%
4%
3%
0 to
4
5 to
9
10 to
14
15 to
19
20 to
24
25 to
29
30 to
34
35 to
40
40
+
22%
23%
19%
12%
12%
7%
3%
1%
0%
Year
s of S
ervic
e
0%
0%
15%
12%
11%
8%
18%
14%
11%
10%
<
20
20 to
24
30 to
34
35 to
39
40 to
44
45 to
49
50 to
54
55 to
59
60 to
64
6
5+
1%
2%
13%
13%
15%
15%
15%
13%
8%
4%
Age
Agen
cy O
verv
iew
:
5th
to 9
5th
Perc
entil
e M
edia
n
Not
es:
63
IIndi
cato
rD
CAS
City
wid
e
Hea
dcou
nt (F
T / F
TE)
1,91
9 / 2
3630
4,06
6 / 2
3,72
7
Med
ian
Age
/ Yea
rs o
f Ser
vice
50.7
/ 10
.145
.2 /
11.1
% M
ale
/ Fem
ale
62%
/ 37
%43
% /
57%
% W
hite
/ M
inor
ity34
% /
66%
39%
/ 61
%
Med
ian
Annu
al F
T Ba
se S
alar
y$4
3,64
6$6
5,29
9
% A
ttriti
on9%
6%
% E
ligib
le to
Ret
ire36
%19
%
% N
ew H
ires
3%5%
% U
nion
Rep
rese
nted
88%
93%
DCA
SCi
tyw
ide
DDCA
S
DCA
SCi
tyw
ide
## in
Age
ncy
% o
f Age
ncy
% o
f City
wid
eM
edia
n Ye
ars
of S
ervi
ce%
Ret
irem
ent
Elig
ible
% A
ttriti
on R
ate
% N
ew
Hire
s
361
16.8
%56
.1%
6.0
23.0
%7.
3%4.
5%
243
11.3
%61
.1%
10.7
38.3
%2.
8%0.
0%
103
4.8%
2.3%
17.8
39.8
%29
.1%
2.6%
974.
5%2.
3%11
.240
.2%
5.9%
0.0%
813.
8%46
.0%
14.6
43.2
%3.
6%7.
1%
673.
1%2.
8%19
.347
.8%
6.8%
2.7%
492.
3%62
.8%
7.1
32.7
%3.
8%0.
0%
492.
3%4.
1%24
.253
.1%
5.7%
0.0%
311.
4%3.
0%8.
025
.8%
11.1
%8.
3%
301.
4%13
.3%
16.6
33.3
%0.
0%0.
0%
Stat
us#
in A
genc
y%
of A
genc
yM
edia
n Ag
eM
edia
n Ye
ars
of S
ervi
ce%
Elig
ible
(2
012)
% E
ligib
le
(201
3 -
2017
)#
Elig
. (2
012
- 20
17)
New
Hire
s74
3.4%
32.6
0.1
42.0
%13
.5%
152
Dec
ease
d9
0.4%
55.8
13.7
47.4
%16
.6%
112
Dism
issal
s33
1.5%
45.7
4.8
34.1
%12
.1%
42
Layo
ffs0
0.0%
N/A
N/A
36.0
%16
.1%
214
Resig
ned
106
4.8%
30.8
2.8
25.0
%30
.0%
11
Retir
emen
t49
2.2%
64.2
26.3
29.8
%21
.3%
353
Sepa
ratio
n of
Tem
p. W
orke
rs0
0.0%
N/A
N/A
37.5
%27
.4%
206
N/A
N/A
N/A
42.9
%4.
8%10
City
wid
e
Dep
artm
ent o
f City
wid
e Ad
min
istra
tive
Serv
ices
: FY1
2
Med
ian
Age
Wor
kfor
ce P
rofil
e
Th
e D
epar
tmen
t of C
ityw
ide
Adm
inist
rativ
e Se
rvice
s (D
CAS)
ens
ures
that
City
age
ncie
s hav
e th
e cr
itica
l res
ourc
es a
nd su
ppor
t nee
ded
to p
rovid
e th
e be
st p
ossib
le se
rvice
s to
the
publ
ic.
Empl
oyee
Typ
e
49.8
50.7
50.7
51.4
52.0
50.8
51.3
50.5
50.0
50.8
Activ
ity S
tatu
sRe
tirem
ent E
ligib
ility
Skille
d Cr
aft W
orke
rs
Teac
hers
Tech
nici
ans
Cate
gorie
s
Adm
inist
rativ
e Su
ppor
t
Offi
cial
s an
d Ad
min
istra
tors
Para
prof
essio
nals
Prof
essio
nals
N
/A a
ppea
rs w
here
the
popu
latio
n ha
s fe
wer
than
5 e
mpl
oyee
s or
ther
e ar
e no
reco
rds
avai
labl
e, a
nd th
eref
ore,
no
calc
ulat
ions
wer
e m
ade.
Dem
ogra
phic
s Full-
Tim
e Em
ploy
ee T
itle
City
Cus
todi
al A
ssist
ant
Cust
odia
n
Prin
cipa
l Adm
inist
rativ
e As
soci
ate
Cler
ical
Ass
ocia
te
Stat
iona
ry E
ngin
eer
Adm
inist
rativ
e St
aff A
naly
st
Hig
h Pr
essu
re P
lant
Ten
der
Asso
ciat
e St
aff A
naly
st
Mai
nten
ance
Wor
ker
Elev
ator
Mec
hani
c
Top
10 M
ost P
opul
ous
Full-
Tim
e Ti
tles
Prot
ectiv
e Se
rvic
e W
orke
rs
Serv
ice
Mai
nten
ance
$10
8,91
4
$10
3,65
1
$31
,125
$
31,8
28
$43
,646
$65
,299
DCA
SCi
tyw
ide
Ann
ual F
T Sa
lary
37%
57
%
62%
43
%
DCA
SCi
tyw
ide
Gen
der
Fem
ale
Mal
e
88%
3% 9%
Activ
eN
ew H
ires
Attri
tion
89%
5% 6%
51%
17%
32%
Perm
anen
t
Prov
ision
al
62%
7%
31%
100%
0%
Civil
ian
Unifo
rm
82%
18%
89%
11%
Fu
ll-tim
eFT
E34
%
39%
35%
32
%
23%
20
%
7%
8%
DCA
SCi
tyw
ide
Ethn
icity
W
hite
Blac
kH
ispan
icAs
ian/
Pacif
ic Is
land
erAm
. Ind
ian/
Ala
skan
Nat
ive
93%
7%
25%
24%
16%
6%
10%
11%
5%
1%
1%
0 to
4
5 to
9
10 to
14
15 to
19
20 to
24
25 to
29
30 to
34
35 to
40
40
+
22%
23%
19%
12%
12%
7%
3%
1%
0%
Year
s of S
ervic
e
0%
2%
8%
8%
11%
15%
20%
16%
12%
8%
<
20
20 to
24
30 to
34
35 to
39
40 to
44
45 to
49
50 to
54
55 to
59
60 to
64
6
5+
1%
2%
13%
13%
15%
15%
15%
13%
8%
4%
Age
Agen
cy O
verv
iew
:
5th
to 9
5th
Perc
entil
e M
edia
n
Not
es:
64
IIndi
cato
rD
CACi
tyw
ide
Hea
dcou
nt (F
T / F
TE)
293
/ 34
304,
066
/ 23,
727
Med
ian
Age
/ Yea
rs o
f Ser
vice
42.2
/ 6.
645
.2 /
11.1
% M
ale
/ Fem
ale
43%
/ 57
%43
% /
57%
% W
hite
/ M
inor
ity34
% /
66%
39%
/ 61
%
Med
ian
Annu
al F
T Ba
se S
alar
y$4
5,61
5$6
5,29
9
% A
ttriti
on15
%6%
% E
ligib
le to
Ret
ire23
%19
%
% N
ew H
ires
16%
5%
% U
nion
Rep
rese
nted
90%
93%
DCA
City
wid
e
DDCA
DCA
City
wid
e
## in
Age
ncy
% o
f Age
ncy
% o
f City
wid
eM
edia
n Ye
ars
of S
ervi
ce%
Ret
irem
ent
Elig
ible
% A
ttriti
on R
ate
% N
ew
Hire
s
6820
.8%
2.8%
3.8
10.3
%12
.2%
19.4
%
5115
.6%
24.8
%7.
227
.5%
25.7
%20
.0%
329.
8%2.
9%6.
918
.8%
18.2
%20
.5%
216.
4%0.
9%3.
20.
0%4.
5%9.
1%
206.
1%0.
5%21
.750
.0%
0.0%
0.0%
175.
2%2.
7%1.
311
.8%
19.0
%38
.1%
134.
0%10
0.0%
23.5
53.8
%18
.8%
0.0%
103.
1%0.
2%29
.880
.0%
9.1%
0.0%
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Stat
us#
in A
genc
y%
of A
genc
yM
edia
n Ag
eM
edia
n Ye
ars
of S
ervi
ce%
Elig
ible
(2
012)
% E
ligib
le
(201
3 -
2017
)#
Elig
. (2
012
- 20
17)
New
Hire
s56
15.8
%29
.00.
556
.8%
18.9
%28
Dec
ease
d1
0.3%
N/A
N/A
8.8%
14.7
%8
Dism
issal
s17
4.8%
34.9
0.3
13.2
%9.
6%31
Layo
ffs0
0.0%
N/A
N/A
28.4
%17
.9%
44
Resig
ned
298.
2%33
.31.
9N
/AN
/AN
/A
Retir
emen
t5
1.4%
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Sepa
ratio
n of
Tem
p. W
orke
rs0
0.0%
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
100.
0%0.
0%1
City
wid
e
Dep
artm
ent o
f Con
sum
er A
ffairs
: FY1
2
Med
ian
Age
Wor
kfor
ce P
rofil
e
Th
e D
epar
tmen
t of C
onsu
mer
Affa
irs (D
CA) e
nsur
es th
at N
ew Y
ork
City
’s co
nsum
ers a
nd b
usin
esse
s ben
efit
from
a fa
ir an
d vib
rant
mar
ketp
lace
. DCA
issu
es m
ore
than
73,
000
licen
ses i
n 55
bus
ines
s cat
egor
ies a
nd p
erfo
rms
onsit
e in
spec
tions
to e
nsur
e co
mpl
ianc
e w
ith
licen
se re
gula
tions
, wei
ghts
and
mea
sure
s reg
ulat
ions
, and
the
New
Yor
k Ci
ty C
onsu
mer
Pro
tect
ion
Law
. DCA
med
iate
s and
reso
lves i
ndiv
idua
l con
sum
er c
ompl
aint
s, ob
tain
s res
titut
ion
for c
onsu
mer
s, an
d br
ings
litig
atio
n an
d en
forc
emen
t act
ions
aga
inst
repe
at v
iola
tors
to h
alt d
ecep
tive
adve
rtisin
g an
d tra
de p
ract
ices.
Empl
oyee
Typ
e
31.7
44.3
41.6
35.9
52.1
36.1
51.1
55.2
N/A
N/A
Activ
ity S
tatu
sRe
tirem
ent E
ligib
ility
Skille
d Cr
aft W
orke
rs
Teac
hers
Tech
nici
ans
Cate
gorie
s
Adm
inist
rativ
e Su
ppor
t
Offi
cial
s an
d Ad
min
istra
tors
Para
prof
essio
nals
Prof
essio
nals
N
/A a
ppea
rs w
here
the
popu
latio
n ha
s fe
wer
than
5 e
mpl
oyee
s or
ther
e ar
e no
reco
rds
avai
labl
e, a
nd th
eref
ore,
no
calc
ulat
ions
wer
e m
ade.
Dem
ogra
phic
s Full-
Tim
e Em
ploy
ee T
itle
Com
mun
ity A
ssoc
iate
Insp
ecto
r
Com
mun
ity C
oord
inat
or
Adm
inist
rativ
e St
aff A
naly
st
Cler
ical
Ass
ocia
te
Agen
cy A
ttorn
ey
Asso
ciat
e In
spec
tor (
Cons
umer
Affa
irs)
Prin
cipa
l Adm
inist
rativ
e As
soci
ate
N/A
N/A
Top
10 M
ost P
opul
ous
Full-
Tim
e Ti
tles
Prot
ectiv
e Se
rvic
e W
orke
rs
Serv
ice
Mai
nten
ance
$99
,683
$
103,
651
$35
,000
$
31,8
28
$45
,615
$65
,299
DCA
City
wid
e
Ann
ual F
T Sa
lary
57%
57
%
43%
43
%
DCA
City
wid
e
Gen
der
Fem
ale
Mal
e
69%
16%
15
%
Activ
eN
ew H
ires
Attri
tion
89%
5% 6%
37%
8%
55%
Pe
rman
ent
Prov
ision
al
62%
7%
31%
100%
0%
Civil
ian
Unifo
rm
82%
18%
90%
10%
Fu
ll-tim
eFT
E34
%
39%
33%
32%
22%
20
%
11%
8%
DCA
City
wid
e
Ethn
icity
W
hite
Blac
kH
ispan
icAs
ian/
Pacif
ic Is
land
erAm
. Ind
ian/
Ala
skan
Nat
ive
93%
7%
40%
24%
11%
5%
8%
8%
3%
0%
0%
0 to
4
5 to
9
10 to
14
15 to
19
20 to
24
25 to
29
30 to
34
35 to
40
40
+
22%
23%
19%
12%
12%
7%
3%
1%
0%
Year
s of S
ervic
e
0%
4%
17%
12%
13%
13%
15%
12%
12%
2%
<
20
20 to
24
30 to
34
35 to
39
40 to
44
45 to
49
50 to
54
55 to
59
60 to
64
6
5+
1%
2%
13%
13%
15%
15%
15%
13%
8%
4%
Age
Agen
cy O
verv
iew
:
5th
to 9
5th
Perc
entil
e M
edia
n
Not
es:
65
IIndi
cato
rD
OC
City
wid
e
Hea
dcou
nt (F
T / F
TE)
9,95
3 / 4
630
4,06
6 / 2
3,72
7
Med
ian
Age
/ Yea
rs o
f Ser
vice
43.8
/ 12
45.2
/ 11
.1
% M
ale
/ Fem
ale
56%
/ 43
%43
% /
57%
% W
hite
/ M
inor
ity14
% /
86%
39%
/ 61
%
Med
ian
Annu
al F
T Ba
se S
alar
y$7
6,48
8$6
5,29
9
% A
ttriti
on7%
6%
% E
ligib
le to
Ret
ire28
%19
%
% N
ew H
ires
5%5%
% U
nion
Rep
rese
nted
99%
93%
DO
CCi
tyw
ide
DDO
C
DO
CCi
tyw
ide
## in
Age
ncy
% o
f Age
ncy
% o
f City
wid
eM
edia
n Ye
ars
of S
ervi
ce%
Ret
irem
ent
Elig
ible
% A
ttriti
on R
ate
% N
ew
Hire
s
7,41
174
.1%
100.
0%10
.723
.0%
6.4%
5.7%
789
7.9%
100.
0%15
.638
.4%
8.5%
0.0%
142
1.4%
100.
0%17
.135
.2%
2.7%
0.7%
127
1.3%
97.7
%13
.633
.9%
3.8%
7.6%
102
1.0%
2.3%
17.6
30.4
%2.
8%17
.0%
971.
0%10
0.0%
24.2
77.3
%5.
8%0.
0%
460.
5%4.
5%11
.739
.1%
8.0%
10.0
%
440.
4%15
.1%
8.3
29.5
%4.
3%0.
0%
420.
4%1.
8%18
.945
.2%
4.5%
2.3%
410.
4%23
.6%
18.2
36.6
%2.
4%0.
0%
Stat
us#
in A
genc
y%
of A
genc
yM
edia
n Ag
eM
edia
n Ye
ars
of S
ervi
ce%
Elig
ible
(2
012)
% E
ligib
le
(201
3 -
2017
)#
Elig
. (2
012
- 20
17)
New
Hire
s53
35.
1%31
.60.
429
.0%
21.0
%10
7
Dec
ease
d12
0.1%
57.0
14.0
45.3
%18
.2%
663
Dism
issal
s69
0.7%
41.9
6.6
18.0
%16
.0%
17
Layo
ffs0
0.0%
N/A
N/A
45.1
%18
.9%
264
Resig
ned
820.
8%35
.11.
823
.0%
13.1
%2,
678
Retir
emen
t53
75.
1%50
.321
.836
.6%
28.4
%19
0
Sepa
ratio
n of
Tem
p. W
orke
rs0
0.0%
N/A
N/A
49.3
%30
.9%
223
N/A
N/A
N/A
22.6
%24
.2%
29
City
wid
e
Dep
artm
ent o
f Cor
rect
ion:
FY1
2
Med
ian
Age
Wor
kfor
ce P
rofil
e
Th
e D
epar
tmen
t of C
orre
ctio
n (D
OC)
pro
vides
for t
he c
are,
cus
tody
and
con
trol o
f per
sons
16
year
s of a
ge a
nd o
lder
, acc
used
of c
rimes
or c
onvic
ted
and
sent
ence
d to
one
yea
r or l
ess o
f inc
arce
ratio
n. T
he D
epar
tmen
t ope
rate
s 14
facil
ities
, inc
ludi
ng 1
0 ja
ils o
n Ri
kers
Isl
and
and
four
bor
ough
hou
ses o
f det
entio
n in
Bro
oklyn
, the
Bro
nx, Q
ueen
s and
Man
hatta
n.
Empl
oyee
Typ
e
42.2
45.1
49.6
53.3
50.1
48.0
52.8
51.9
50.3
53.3
Activ
ity S
tatu
sRe
tirem
ent E
ligib
ility
Skille
d Cr
aft W
orke
rs
Teac
hers
Tech
nici
ans
Cate
gorie
s
Adm
inist
rativ
e Su
ppor
t
Offi
cial
s an
d Ad
min
istra
tors
Para
prof
essio
nals
Prof
essio
nals
N
/A a
ppea
rs w
here
the
popu
latio
n ha
s fe
wer
than
5 e
mpl
oyee
s or
ther
e ar
e no
reco
rds
avai
labl
e, a
nd th
eref
ore,
no
calc
ulat
ions
wer
e m
ade.
Dem
ogra
phic
s Full-
Tim
e Em
ploy
ee T
itle
Corr
ectio
n O
ffice
r
Capt
ain
(Cor
rect
ion)
Prog
ram
Spe
cial
ist (C
orre
ctio
n)
Cook
Prin
cipa
l Adm
inist
rativ
e As
soci
ate
War
den
- As
sista
nt D
eput
y W
arde
n
Mai
nten
ance
Wor
ker
Mot
or V
ehic
le O
pera
tor
Adm
inist
rativ
e St
aff A
naly
st
Oile
r
Top
10 M
ost P
opul
ous
Full-
Tim
e Ti
tles
Prot
ectiv
e Se
rvic
e W
orke
rs
Serv
ice
Mai
nten
ance
$98
,072
$
103,
651
$39
,755
$
31,8
28
$76
,488
$
65,2
99
DO
CCi
tyw
ide
Ann
ual F
T Sa
lary
43%
57
%
56%
43
%
DO
CCi
tyw
ide
Gen
der
Fem
ale
Mal
e
88%
5% 7%
Ac
tive
New
Hire
sAt
tritio
n89
%
5% 6%
93%
4%
3%
Perm
anen
t
Prov
ision
al
62%
7%
31%
15%
85
%
Civil
ian
Unifo
rm
82%
18%
100%
0%
Full-
time
FTE
14%
39%
65%
32%
17%
20%
3%
8%
DO
CCi
tyw
ide
Ethn
icity
W
hite
Blac
kH
ispan
icAs
ian/
Pacif
ic Is
land
erAm
. Ind
ian/
Ala
skan
Nat
ive
93%
7%
20%
22%
18%
13%
19%
6%
1%
0%
0%
0 to
4
5 to
9
10 to
14
15 to
19
20 to
24
25 to
29
30 to
34
35 to
40
40
+
22%
23%
19%
12%
12%
7%
3%
1%
0%
Year
s of S
ervic
e
0%
1%
13%
16%
20%
23%
15%
8%
3%
1%
<
20
20 to
24
30 to
34
35 to
39
40 to
44
45 to
49
50 to
54
55 to
59
60 to
64
6
5+
1%
2%
13%
13%
15%
15%
15%
13%
8%
4%
Age
Agen
cy O
verv
iew
:
5th
to 9
5th
Perc
entil
e M
edia
n
Not
es:
66
IIndi
cato
rD
CLA
City
wid
e
Hea
dcou
nt (F
T / F
TE)
43 /
1430
4,06
6 / 2
3,72
7
Med
ian
Age
/ Yea
rs o
f Ser
vice
40.1
/ 6.
445
.2 /
11.1
% M
ale
/ Fem
ale
37%
/ 61
%43
% /
57%
% W
hite
/ M
inor
ity51
% /
49%
39%
/ 61
%
Med
ian
Annu
al F
T Ba
se S
alar
y$6
6,52
3$6
5,29
9
% A
ttriti
on11
%6%
% E
ligib
le to
Ret
ire15
%19
%
% N
ew H
ires
13%
5%
% U
nion
Rep
rese
nted
74%
93%
DCL
ACi
tyw
ide
DDCL
A
DCL
ACi
tyw
ide
## in
Age
ncy
% o
f Age
ncy
% o
f City
wid
eM
edia
n Ye
ars
of S
ervi
ce%
Ret
irem
ent
Elig
ible
% A
ttriti
on R
ate
% N
ew
Hire
s
712
.3%
0.6%
2.3
0.0%
12.5
%0.
0%
610
.5%
0.3%
9.3
16.7
%0.
0%16
.7%
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Stat
us#
in A
genc
y%
of A
genc
yM
edia
n Ag
eM
edia
n Ye
ars
of S
ervi
ce%
Elig
ible
(2
012)
% E
ligib
le
(201
3 -
2017
)#
Elig
. (2
012
- 20
17)
New
Hire
s8
13.1
%31
.70.
333
.3%
33.3
%2
Dec
ease
d0
0.0%
N/A
N/A
28.6
%21
.4%
7
Dism
issal
s1
1.6%
N/A
N/A
5.3%
10.5
%3
Layo
ffs0
0.0%
N/A
N/A
12.5
%18
.8%
5
Resig
ned
69.
8%30
.34.
7N
/AN
/AN
/A
Retir
emen
t0
0.0%
N/A
N/A
0.0%
0.0%
0
Sepa
ratio
n of
Tem
p. W
orke
rs0
0.0%
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
City
wid
e
Dep
artm
ent o
f Cul
tura
l Affa
irs: F
Y12
Med
ian
Age
Wor
kfor
ce P
rofil
e
Th
e D
epar
tmen
t of C
ultu
ral A
ffairs
(DCL
A) e
nsur
es th
at c
ultu
ral a
ctivi
ties a
re a
n in
tegr
al p
art o
f New
Yor
k Ci
ty’s
civic
and
econ
omic
life
by p
rovid
ing
supp
ort,
advo
cacy
and
tech
nica
l ass
istan
ce fo
r the
City
’s cu
ltura
l com
mun
ity. D
CLA’
s con
stitu
ency
con
sists
of t
he 3
3 Ci
ty-
owne
d cu
ltura
l ins
titut
ions
com
prisi
ng th
e Cu
ltura
l Ins
titut
ions
Gro
up (C
IG),
and
mor
e th
an 1
,200
oth
er n
ot-f
or-p
rofit
org
aniz
atio
ns se
rvin
g co
nstit
uenc
ies i
n al
l nei
ghbo
rhoo
ds o
f the
City
.
Empl
oyee
Typ
e
40.0
41.7
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Activ
ity S
tatu
sRe
tirem
ent E
ligib
ility
Skille
d Cr
aft W
orke
rs
Teac
hers
Tech
nici
ans
Cate
gorie
s
Adm
inist
rativ
e Su
ppor
t
Offi
cial
s an
d Ad
min
istra
tors
Para
prof
essio
nals
Prof
essio
nals
N
/A a
ppea
rs w
here
the
popu
latio
n ha
s fe
wer
than
5 e
mpl
oyee
s or
ther
e ar
e no
reco
rds
avai
labl
e, a
nd th
eref
ore,
no
calc
ulat
ions
wer
e m
ade.
Dem
ogra
phic
s Full-
Tim
e Em
ploy
ee T
itle
Com
mun
ity C
oord
inat
or
Adm
inist
rativ
e St
aff A
naly
st
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Top
10 M
ost P
opul
ous
Full-
Tim
e Ti
tles
Prot
ectiv
e Se
rvic
e W
orke
rs
Serv
ice
Mai
nten
ance
$13
5,91
2
$10
3,65
1
$44
,000
$
31,8
28
$66
,523
$
65,2
99
DCL
ACi
tyw
ide
Ann
ual F
T Sa
lary
61%
57
%
37%
43
%
DCL
ACi
tyw
ide
Gen
der
Fem
ale
Mal
e
75%
13%
12%
Activ
eN
ew H
ires
Attri
tion
89%
5% 6%
9%
17%
74%
Pe
rman
ent
Prov
ision
al
62%
7%
31%
100%
0%
Civil
ian
Unifo
rm
82%
18%
75%
25%
Full-
time
FTE
51%
39%
33%
32%
7%
20%
9%
8%
DCL
ACi
tyw
ide
Ethn
icity
W
hite
Blac
kH
ispan
icAs
ian/
Pacif
ic Is
land
erAm
. Ind
ian/
Ala
skan
Nat
ive
93%
7%
44%
24%
15%
7%
2%
4%
4%
0%
0%
0 to
4
5 to
9
10 to
14
15 to
19
20 to
24
25 to
29
30 to
34
35 to
40
40
+
22%
23%
19%
12%
12%
7%
3%
1%
0%
Year
s of S
ervic
e
0%
0%
21%
19%
17%
4%
21%
6%
9%
2%
<
20
20 to
24
30 to
34
35 to
39
40 to
44
45 to
49
50 to
54
55 to
59
60 to
64
6
5+
1%
2%
13%
13%
15%
15%
15%
13%
8%
4%
Age
Agen
cy O
verv
iew
:
5th
to 9
5th
Perc
entil
e M
edia
n
Not
es:
67
IIndi
cato
rD
DC
City
wid
e
Hea
dcou
nt (F
T / F
TE)
1,09
5 / 3
930
4,06
6 / 2
3,72
7
Med
ian
Age
/ Yea
rs o
f Ser
vice
53 /
15.3
45.2
/ 11
.1
% M
ale
/ Fem
ale
69%
/ 31
%43
% /
57%
% W
hite
/ M
inor
ity38
% /
62%
39%
/ 61
%
Med
ian
Annu
al F
T Ba
se S
alar
y$6
8,62
7$6
5,29
9
% A
ttriti
on8%
6%
% E
ligib
le to
Ret
ire47
%19
%
% N
ew H
ires
9%5%
% U
nion
Rep
rese
nted
78%
93%
DD
CCi
tyw
ide
DDD
C
DD
CCi
tyw
ide
## in
Age
ncy
% o
f Age
ncy
% o
f City
wid
eM
edia
n Ye
ars
of S
ervi
ce%
Ret
irem
ent
Elig
ible
% A
ttriti
on R
ate
% N
ew
Hire
s
100
8.8%
19.2
%15
.258
.0%
9.0%
0.0%
837.
3%17
.7%
23.2
62.7
%4.
5%0.
0%
756.
6%25
.6%
12.1
48.0
%3.
8%0.
0%
756.
6%27
.5%
20.2
48.0
%5.
1%7.
6%
635.
6%27
.9%
12.3
39.7
%0.
0%20
.6%
514.
5%15
.6%
23.9
70.6
%1.
9%1.
9%
343.
0%0.
8%22
.147
.1%
2.9%
0.0%
322.
8%7.
4%14
.943
.8%
8.6%
0.0%
322.
8%28
.6%
15.6
46.9
%3.
0%0.
0%
322.
8%1.
4%23
.146
.9%
0.0%
3.0%
Stat
us#
in A
genc
y%
of A
genc
yM
edia
n Ag
eM
edia
n Ye
ars
of S
ervi
ce%
Elig
ible
(2
012)
% E
ligib
le
(201
3 -
2017
)#
Elig
. (2
012
- 20
17)
New
Hire
s10
18.
5%27
.90.
141
.2%
13.7
%56
Dec
ease
d2
0.2%
N/A
N/A
54.8
%22
.1%
240
Dism
issal
s7
0.6%
47.5
1.1
10.6
%0.
0%5
Layo
ffs0
0.0%
N/A
N/A
47.3
%18
.0%
374
Resig
ned
433.
6%25
.00.
2N
/AN
/AN
/A
Retir
emen
t37
3.1%
65.6
24.3
50.0
%0.
0%1
Sepa
ratio
n of
Tem
p. W
orke
rs0
0.0%
N/A
N/A
54.5
%36
.4%
10
N/A
N/A
N/A
34.0
%20
.0%
27
City
wid
e
Dep
artm
ent o
f Des
ign
and
Cons
truc
tion:
FY1
2
Med
ian
Age
Wor
kfor
ce P
rofil
e
Th
e D
epar
tmen
t of D
esig
n an
d Co
nstru
ctio
n (D
DC)
man
ages
a d
esig
n an
d co
nstru
ctio
n po
rtfol
io o
f mor
e th
an $
7 bi
llion
of th
e Ci
ty's
capi
tal p
rogr
am. P
roje
cts r
ange
from
road
way
s, se
wer
s and
wat
er m
ains
to p
ublic
safe
ty, h
ealth
and
hum
an se
rvice
facil
ities
, as w
ell a
s cu
ltura
l ins
titut
ions
and
libr
arie
s. Th
roug
h a
com
bina
tion
of in
-hou
se st
aff a
nd p
rivat
e co
nsul
tant
s and
con
tract
ors,
the
Dep
artm
ent d
elive
rs q
ualit
y, c
ost-
effe
ctiv
e pr
ojec
ts in
a sa
fe a
nd e
fficie
nt m
anne
r.
Empl
oyee
Typ
e
56.9
56.9
55.5
53.9
53.1
57.9
50.9
46.0
52.9
52.3
Activ
ity S
tatu
sRe
tirem
ent E
ligib
ility
Skille
d Cr
aft W
orke
rs
Teac
hers
Tech
nici
ans
Cate
gorie
s
Adm
inist
rativ
e Su
ppor
t
Offi
cial
s an
d Ad
min
istra
tors
Para
prof
essio
nals
Prof
essio
nals
N
/A a
ppea
rs w
here
the
popu
latio
n ha
s fe
wer
than
5 e
mpl
oyee
s or
ther
e ar
e no
reco
rds
avai
labl
e, a
nd th
eref
ore,
no
calc
ulat
ions
wer
e m
ade.
Dem
ogra
phic
s Full-
Tim
e Em
ploy
ee T
itle
Cons
truct
ion
Proj
ect M
anag
er
Asso
ciat
e Pr
ojec
t Man
ager
Assis
tant
Civ
il En
gine
er
Civi
l Eng
inee
r
Adm
inist
rativ
e Pr
ojec
t Man
ager
Adm
inist
rativ
e En
gine
er
Prin
cipa
l Adm
inist
rativ
e As
soci
ate
Proc
urem
ent A
naly
st
Asso
ciat
e En
gine
erin
g Te
chni
cian
Adm
inist
rativ
e St
aff A
naly
st
Top
10 M
ost P
opul
ous
Full-
Tim
e Ti
tles
Prot
ectiv
e Se
rvic
e W
orke
rs
Serv
ice
Mai
nten
ance
$11
6,13
3
$10
3,65
1
$43
,349
$
31,8
28
$68
,627
$
65,2
99
DD
CCi
tyw
ide
Ann
ual F
T Sa
lary
31%
57
%
69%
43
%
DD
CCi
tyw
ide
Gen
der
Fem
ale
Mal
e
84%
9% 7%
Ac
tive
New
Hire
sAt
tritio
n89
%
5% 6%
57%
36%
7%
Pe
rman
ent
Prov
ision
al
62%
7%
31%
100%
0%
Civil
ian
Unifo
rm
82%
18%
97%
3%
Full-
time
FTE
38%
39
%
26%
32%
11%
20%
26%
8%
DD
CCi
tyw
ide
Ethn
icity
W
hite
Blac
kH
ispan
icAs
ian/
Pacif
ic Is
land
erAm
. Ind
ian/
Ala
skan
Nat
ive
93%
7%
18%
12%
19%
11%
20%
14%
4%
1%
1%
0 to
4
5 to
9
10 to
14
15 to
19
20 to
24
25 to
29
30 to
34
35 to
40
40
+
22%
23%
19%
12%
12%
7%
3%
1%
0%
Year
s of S
ervic
e
0%
4%
6%
6%
8%
13%
19%
17%
15%
11%
<
20
20 to
24
30 to
34
35 to
39
40 to
44
45 to
49
50 to
54
55 to
59
60 to
64
6
5+
1%
2%
13%
13%
15%
15%
15%
13%
8%
4%
Age
Agen
cy O
verv
iew
:
5th
to 9
5th
Perc
entil
e M
edia
n
Not
es:
68
IIndi
cato
rD
OE
City
wid
e
Hea
dcou
nt (F
T / F
TE)
118,
716
/ 13,
557
304,
066
/ 23,
727
Med
ian
Age
/ Yea
rs o
f Ser
vice
45.7
/ 11
.545
.2 /
11.1
% M
ale
/ Fem
ale
23%
/ 77
%43
% /
57%
% W
hite
/ M
inor
ity48
% /
52%
39%
/ 61
%
Med
ian
Annu
al F
T Ba
se S
alar
y$6
9,90
1$6
5,29
9
% A
ttriti
on3%
6%
% E
ligib
le to
Ret
ire10
%19
%
% N
ew H
ires
3%5%
% U
nion
Rep
rese
nted
93%
93%
DO
ECi
tyw
ide
DDO
E
DO
ECi
tyw
ide
## in
Age
ncy
% o
f Age
ncy
% o
f City
wid
eM
edia
n Ye
ars
of S
ervi
ce%
Ret
irem
ent
Elig
ible
% A
ttriti
on R
ate
% N
ew
Hire
s
51,3
9038
.9%
100.
0%10
.88.
2%2.
8%2.
6%
18,2
8513
.8%
100.
0%12
.512
.1%
2.7%
3.1%
17,4
3413
.2%
100.
0%7.
88.
5%3.
2%7.
4%
3,09
72.
3%10
0.0%
15.8
10.1
%1.
6%0.
1%
2,77
62.
1%10
0.0%
14.8
20.6
%1.
8%0.
2%
2,48
31.
9%10
0.0%
12.6
11.4
%2.
1%0.
8%
1,54
61.
2%10
0.0%
19.8
15.8
%2.
2%0.
1%
1,33
01.
0%55
.1%
6.8
3.9%
8.7%
6.5%
1,27
81.
0%10
0.0%
13.0
16.0
%3.
1%2.
3%
1,15
50.
9%10
0.0%
12.8
15.6
%2.
7%4.
3%
Stat
us#
in A
genc
y%
of A
genc
yM
edia
n Ag
eM
edia
n Ye
ars
of S
ervi
ce%
Elig
ible
(2
012)
% E
ligib
le
(201
3 -
2017
)#
Elig
. (2
012
- 20
17)
New
Hire
s4,
348
3.3%
26.2
0.8
23.4
%18
.8%
543
Dec
ease
d13
10.
1%58
.116
.912
.3%
13.0
%1,
712
Dism
issal
s50
80.
4%36
.04.
110
.8%
12.4
%9,
708
Layo
ffs90
0.1%
49.1
7.0
9.8%
9.9%
3,24
3
Resig
ned
1,41
31.
1%34
.14.
0N
/AN
/AN
/A
Retir
emen
t2,
083
1.6%
63.1
24.1
17.2
%18
.5%
405
Sepa
ratio
n of
Tem
p. W
orke
rs0
0.0%
N/A
N/A
15.6
%29
.5%
202
9.5%
8.9%
14,5
82
0.5%
0.7%
64
City
wid
e
Dep
artm
ent o
f Edu
catio
n: F
Y12
Med
ian
Age
Wor
kfor
ce P
rofil
e
Th
e D
epar
tmen
t of E
duca
tion
(DO
E) p
rovid
es p
rimar
y an
d se
cond
ary
educ
atio
n to
ove
r 1 m
illion
pre
-kin
derg
arte
n to
gra
de 1
2 st
uden
ts in
32
scho
ol d
istric
ts o
ver 1
,700
scho
ols.
DO
E pr
epar
es st
uden
ts to
mee
t gra
de le
vel s
tand
ards
in re
adin
g, w
ritin
g an
d m
ath,
and
pr
epar
es h
igh
scho
ol st
uden
ts to
pas
s Reg
ents
exa
ms a
nd to
mee
t gra
duat
ion
requ
irem
ents
.
Empl
oyee
Typ
e
41.8
48.6
39.0
45.8
55.2
44.4
49.6
47.0
51.4
45.8
Activ
ity S
tatu
sRe
tirem
ent E
ligib
ility
Skille
d Cr
aft W
orke
rs
Teac
hers
Tech
nici
ans
Cate
gorie
s
Adm
inist
rativ
e Su
ppor
t
Offi
cial
s an
d Ad
min
istra
tors
Para
prof
essio
nals
Prof
essio
nals
N
/A a
ppea
rs w
here
the
popu
latio
n ha
s fe
wer
than
5 e
mpl
oyee
s or
ther
e ar
e no
reco
rds
avai
labl
e, a
nd th
eref
ore,
no
calc
ulat
ions
wer
e m
ade.
Dem
ogra
phic
s Full-
Tim
e Em
ploy
ee T
itle
Teac
her
Annu
al E
duca
tion
Para
Teac
her S
peci
al E
duca
tion
Assis
tant
Prin
cipa
l
Scho
ol S
ecre
tary
Gui
danc
e Co
unse
lor
Prin
cipa
l
Com
mun
ity A
ssoc
iate
Scho
ol S
ocia
l Wor
ker
Scho
ol P
sych
olog
ist
Top
10 M
ost P
opul
ous
Full-
Tim
e Ti
tles
Prot
ectiv
e Se
rvic
e W
orke
rs
Serv
ice
Mai
nten
ance
$10
3,43
4
$10
3,65
1
$26
,625
$
31,8
28
$69
,901
$
65,2
99
DO
ECi
tyw
ide
Ann
ual F
T Sa
lary
77%
57
%
23%
43
%
DO
ECi
tyw
ide
Gen
der
Fem
ale
Mal
e
94%
3% 3%
Ac
tive
New
Hire
sAt
tritio
n89
%
5% 6%
45%
3%
52%
Pe
rman
ent
Prov
ision
al
62%
7%
31%
100%
0%
Civil
ian
Unifo
rm
82%
18%
90%
10%
Fu
ll-tim
eFT
E
48%
39
%
23%
32
%
21%
20
%
8%
8%
DO
ECi
tyw
ide
Ethn
icity
W
hite
Blac
kH
ispan
icAs
ian/
Pacif
ic Is
land
erAm
. Ind
ian/
Ala
skan
Nat
ive
93%
7%
20%
24%
24%
12%
9%
7%
2%
1%
1%
0 to
4
5 to
9
10 to
14
15 to
19
20 to
24
25 to
29
30 to
34
35 to
40
40
+
22%
23%
19%
12%
12%
7%
3%
1%
0%
Year
s of S
ervic
e
1%
2%
14%
13%
13%
14%
15%
14%
10%
5%
<
20
20 to
24
30 to
34
35 to
39
40 to
44
45 to
49
50 to
54
55 to
59
60 to
64
6
5+
1%
2%
13%
13%
15%
15%
15%
13%
8%
4%
Age
Agen
cy O
verv
iew
:
5th
to 9
5th
Perc
entil
e M
edia
n
Not
es:
69
IIndi
cato
rD
EPCi
tyw
ide
Hea
dcou
nt (F
T / F
TE)
5,56
4 / 1
7630
4,06
6 / 2
3,72
7
Med
ian
Age
/ Yea
rs o
f Ser
vice
49.2
/ 14
.745
.2 /
11.1
% M
ale
/ Fem
ale
77%
/ 23
%43
% /
57%
% W
hite
/ M
inor
ity55
% /
45%
39%
/ 61
%
Med
ian
Annu
al F
T Ba
se S
alar
y$5
7,31
1$6
5,29
9
% A
ttriti
on6%
6%
% E
ligib
le to
Ret
ire33
%19
%
% N
ew H
ires
4%5%
% U
nion
Rep
rese
nted
92%
93%
DEP
City
wid
e
DDEP
DEP
City
wid
e
## in
Age
ncy
% o
f Age
ncy
% o
f City
wid
eM
edia
n Ye
ars
of S
ervi
ce%
Ret
irem
ent
Elig
ible
% A
ttriti
on R
ate
% N
ew
Hire
s
652
11.4
%10
0.0%
9.7
25.9
%3.
6%0.
0%
358
6.2%
93.2
%15
.924
.9%
5.5%
0.0%
329
5.7%
7.4%
16.2
37.4
%12
.0%
2.1%
261
4.5%
6.1%
9.0
29.9
%4.
6%0.
0%
236
4.1%
100.
0%11
.323
.3%
3.7%
10.2
%
219
3.8%
46.7
%16
.128
.8%
2.7%
0.4%
189
3.3%
100.
0%8.
63.
2%5.
0%12
.1%
171
3.0%
100.
0%22
.855
.0%
12.8
%4.
1%
166
2.9%
100.
0%22
.148
.2%
6.7%
0.0%
157
2.7%
48.2
%20
.342
.0%
2.5%
1.2%
Stat
us#
in A
genc
y%
of A
genc
yM
edia
n Ag
eM
edia
n Ye
ars
of S
ervi
ce%
Elig
ible
(2
012)
% E
ligib
le
(201
3 -
2017
)#
Elig
. (2
012
- 20
17)
New
Hire
s24
84.
1%28
.30.
430
.1%
20.1
%36
7
Dec
ease
d16
0.3%
56.5
19.2
44.5
%24
.2%
290
Dism
issal
s74
1.2%
36.5
1.7
22.4
%13
.3%
51
Layo
ffs0
0.0%
N/A
N/A
35.5
%22
.0%
948
Resig
ned
831.
4%34
.04.
03.
2%3.
7%13
Retir
emen
t18
33.
0%62
.326
.923
.1%
23.3
%22
5
Sepa
ratio
n of
Tem
p. W
orke
rs30
0.5%
19.4
N/A
37.7
%22
.6%
1,07
9
N/A
N/A
N/A
27.6
%16
.9%
108
City
wid
e
Dep
artm
ent o
f Env
ironm
enta
l Pro
tect
ion
: FY1
2
Med
ian
Age
Wor
kfor
ce P
rofil
e
Th
e D
epar
tmen
t of E
nviro
nmen
tal P
rote
ctio
n (D
EP) p
rote
cts t
he e
nviro
nmen
tal h
ealth
, wel
fare
, and
nat
ural
reso
urce
s of t
he C
ity a
nd it
s res
iden
ts. T
he D
epar
tmen
t man
ages
the
City
's w
ater
supp
ly, w
hich
pro
vides
mor
e th
an o
ne b
illion
gal
lons
of h
igh
qual
ity d
rinkin
g w
ater
dai
ly to
mor
e th
an h
alf t
he p
opul
atio
n of
New
Yor
k St
ate;
mai
ntai
ns th
e Ci
ty’s
wat
er d
istrib
utio
n ne
twor
k, fi
re h
ydra
nts,
and
stor
m a
nd sa
nita
ry se
wag
e co
llect
ion
syst
ems;
and
man
ages
14
in-C
ity w
aste
wat
er tr
eatm
ent p
lant
s as
wel
l as s
even
trea
tmen
t pla
nts u
psta
te.
Empl
oyee
Typ
e
48.3
46.0
50.4
45.8
47.6
49.3
35.5
53.4
53.1
50.2
Activ
ity S
tatu
sRe
tirem
ent E
ligib
ility
Skille
d Cr
aft W
orke
rs
Teac
hers
Tech
nici
ans
Cate
gorie
s
Adm
inist
rativ
e Su
ppor
t
Offi
cial
s an
d Ad
min
istra
tors
Para
prof
essio
nals
Prof
essio
nals
N
/A a
ppea
rs w
here
the
popu
latio
n ha
s fe
wer
than
5 e
mpl
oyee
s or
ther
e ar
e no
reco
rds
avai
labl
e, a
nd th
eref
ore,
no
calc
ulat
ions
wer
e m
ade.
Dem
ogra
phic
s Full-
Tim
e Em
ploy
ee T
itle
Sew
age
Trea
tmen
t Wor
ker
Cons
truct
ion
Labo
rer
Prin
cipa
l Adm
inist
rativ
e As
soci
ate
Cler
ical
Ass
ocia
te
Wat
ersh
ed M
aint
aine
r
Asso
ciat
e Pr
ojec
t Man
ager
Envi
ronm
enta
l Pol
ice
Offi
cer
Stat
iona
ry E
ngin
eer (
Elec
tric)
Seni
or S
ewag
e Tr
eatm
ent W
orke
r
Adm
inist
rativ
e En
gine
er
Top
10 M
ost P
opul
ous
Full-
Tim
e Ti
tles
Prot
ectiv
e Se
rvic
e W
orke
rs
Serv
ice
Mai
nten
ance
$10
7,26
5
$10
3,65
1
$35
,285
$
31,8
28
$57
,311
$
65,2
99
DEP
City
wid
e
Ann
ual F
T Sa
lary
23%
57%
77%
43%
DEP
City
wid
e
Gen
der
Fem
ale
Mal
e
90%
4% 6%
Ac
tive
New
Hire
sAt
tritio
n89
%
5% 6%
63%
19%
18
%
Perm
anen
t
Prov
ision
al
62%
7%
31%
100%
0%
Civil
ian
Unifo
rm
82%
18%
97%
3%
Full-
time
FTE
55%
39%
20%
32%
11%
20
%
14%
8%
DEP
City
wid
e
Ethn
icity
W
hite
Blac
kH
ispan
icAs
ian/
Pacif
ic Is
land
erAm
. Ind
ian/
Ala
skan
Nat
ive
93%
7%
19%
19%
13%
15%
18%
11%
4%
1%
0%
0 to
4
5 to
9
10 to
14
15 to
19
20 to
24
25 to
29
30 to
34
35 to
40
40
+
22%
23%
19%
12%
12%
7%
3%
1%
0%
Year
s of S
ervic
e
0%
2%
9%
10%
12%
18%
20%
16%
9%
5%
<
20
20 to
24
30 to
34
35 to
39
40 to
44
45 to
49
50 to
54
55 to
59
60 to
64
6
5+
1%
2%
13%
13%
15%
15%
15%
13%
8%
4%
Age
Agen
cy O
verv
iew
:
5th
to 9
5th
Perc
entil
e M
edia
n
Not
es:
70
IIndi
cato
rD
OF
City
wid
e
Hea
dcou
nt (F
T / F
TE)
1,75
0 / 6
430
4,06
6 / 2
3,72
7
Med
ian
Age
/ Yea
rs o
f Ser
vice
53.2
/ 22
.245
.2 /
11.1
% M
ale
/ Fem
ale
50%
/ 50
%43
% /
57%
% W
hite
/ M
inor
ity34
% /
66%
39%
/ 61
%
Med
ian
Annu
al F
T Ba
se S
alar
y$6
0,00
8$6
5,29
9
% A
ttriti
on7%
6%
% E
ligib
le to
Ret
ire51
%19
%
% N
ew H
ires
6%5%
% U
nion
Rep
rese
nted
82%
93%
DO
FCi
tyw
ide
DDO
F
DO
FCi
tyw
ide
## in
Age
ncy
% o
f Age
ncy
% o
f City
wid
eM
edia
n Ye
ars
of S
ervi
ce%
Ret
irem
ent
Elig
ible
% A
ttriti
on R
ate
% N
ew
Hire
s
300
16.5
%99
.3%
24.0
58.3
%6.
0%11
.3%
288
15.9
%6.
5%24
.058
.0%
6.2%
2.9%
277
15.3
%6.
5%18
.848
.0%
3.8%
0.7%
117
6.4%
96.7
%26
.572
.6%
7.1%
12.7
%
955.
2%9.
1%20
.066
.3%
4.0%
2.0%
915.
0%10
0.0%
19.5
23.1
%5.
2%0.
0%
905.
0%3.
8%22
.948
.9%
7.2%
5.2%
894.
9%12
.5%
2.7
16.9
%4.
3%21
.5%
422.
3%3.
5%24
.571
.4%
4.5%
0.0%
311.
7%10
0.0%
29.9
96.8
%8.
8%0.
0%
Stat
us#
in A
genc
y%
of A
genc
yM
edia
n Ag
eM
edia
n Ye
ars
of S
ervi
ce%
Elig
ible
(2
012)
% E
ligib
le
(201
3 -
2017
)#
Elig
. (2
012
- 20
17)
New
Hire
s11
45.
9%36
.50.
553
.2%
21.2
%44
5
Dec
ease
d4
0.2%
N/A
N/A
44.2
%23
.6%
175
Dism
issal
s31
1.6%
42.2
0.9
47.1
%5.
9%9
Layo
ffs0
0.0%
N/A
N/A
55.6
%14
.5%
546
Resig
ned
231.
2%38
.81.
325
.0%
40.7
%71
Retir
emen
t69
3.6%
62.9
27.8
12.5
%37
.5%
8
Sepa
ratio
n of
Tem
p. W
orke
rs0
0.0%
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
45.8
%16
.7%
15
City
wid
e
Dep
artm
ent o
f Fin
ance
: FY1
2
Med
ian
Age
Wor
kfor
ce P
rofil
e
Th
e D
epar
tmen
t of F
inan
ce (D
OF)
col
lect
s City
reve
nues
; enf
orce
s com
plia
nce
with
City
tax
law
s; va
lues
all
real
pro
perty
in th
e Ci
ty; m
aint
ains
pro
perty
reco
rds;
prov
ides
an
inde
pend
ent f
orum
for t
he p
ublic
to c
onte
st su
mm
onse
s iss
ued
for p
arkin
g vio
latio
ns; a
nd,
thro
ugh
the
Sher
iff’s
Offi
ce, s
erve
s as
the
chie
f civ
il la
w e
nfor
cem
ent b
ody
for N
ew Y
ork
City
. The
May
or’s
Offi
ce o
f Pen
sions
and
Inve
stm
ents
, loc
ated
at D
OF,
repr
esen
ts th
e M
ayor
at t
he C
ity's
five
pens
ion
syst
ems.
Empl
oyee
Typ
e
54.5
53.2
52.8
55.4
57.7
49.0
52.0
50.2
55.6
55.4
Activ
ity S
tatu
sRe
tirem
ent E
ligib
ility
Skille
d Cr
aft W
orke
rs
Teac
hers
Tech
nici
ans
Cate
gorie
s
Adm
inist
rativ
e Su
ppor
t
Offi
cial
s an
d Ad
min
istra
tors
Para
prof
essio
nals
Prof
essio
nals
N
/A a
ppea
rs w
here
the
popu
latio
n ha
s fe
wer
than
5 e
mpl
oyee
s or
ther
e ar
e no
reco
rds
avai
labl
e, a
nd th
eref
ore,
no
calc
ulat
ions
wer
e m
ade.
Dem
ogra
phic
s Full-
Tim
e Em
ploy
ee T
itle
City
Tax
Aud
itor
Prin
cipa
l Adm
inist
rativ
e As
soci
ate
Cler
ical
Ass
ocia
te
City
Ass
esso
r
Com
pute
r Spe
cial
ist (S
oftw
are)
Dep
uty
City
She
riff
Adm
inist
rativ
e St
aff A
naly
st
Com
pute
r Sys
tem
s M
anag
er
Asso
ciat
e St
aff A
naly
st
Adm
inist
rativ
e Ta
x Au
dito
r
Top
10 M
ost P
opul
ous
Full-
Tim
e Ti
tles
Prot
ectiv
e Se
rvic
e W
orke
rs
Serv
ice
Mai
nten
ance
$12
0,00
0
$10
3,65
1
$35
,285
$
31,8
28
$60
,008
$
65,2
99
DO
FCi
tyw
ide
Ann
ual F
T Sa
lary
50%
57
%
50%
43
%
DO
FCi
tyw
ide
Gen
der
Fem
ale
Mal
e
87%
6% 7%
Ac
tive
New
Hire
sAt
tritio
n89
%
5% 6%
71%
20%
9%
Pe
rman
ent
Prov
ision
al
62%
7%
31%
100%
0%
Civil
ian
Unifo
rm
82%
18%
96%
4%
Full-
time
FTE
34%
39
%
42%
32
%
11%
20
%
13%
8%
DO
FCi
tyw
ide
Ethn
icity
W
hite
Blac
kH
ispan
icAs
ian/
Pacif
ic Is
land
erAm
. Ind
ian/
Ala
skan
Nat
ive
93%
7%
14%
11%
9%
11%
20%
22%
10%
2%
1%
0 to
4
5 to
9
10 to
14
15 to
19
20 to
24
25 to
29
30 to
34
35 to
40
40
+
22%
23%
19%
12%
12%
7%
3%
1%
0%
Year
s of S
ervic
e
0%
1%
4%
4%
8%
17%
24%
22%
15%
7%
<
20
20 to
24
30 to
34
35 to
39
40 to
44
45 to
49
50 to
54
55 to
59
60 to
64
6
5+
1%
2%
13%
13%
15%
15%
15%
13%
8%
4%
Age
Agen
cy O
verv
iew
:
5th
to 9
5th
Perc
entil
e M
edia
n
Not
es:
71
IIndi
cato
rD
OH
MH
City
wid
e
Hea
dcou
nt (F
T / F
TE)
4,47
0 / 1
,291
304,
066
/ 23,
727
Med
ian
Age
/ Yea
rs o
f Ser
vice
49 /
9.5
45.2
/ 11
.1
% M
ale
/ Fem
ale
30%
/ 70
%43
% /
57%
% W
hite
/ M
inor
ity27
% /
73%
39%
/ 61
%
Med
ian
Annu
al F
T Ba
se S
alar
y$5
5,33
3$6
5,29
9
% A
ttriti
on9%
6%
% E
ligib
le to
Ret
ire29
%19
%
% N
ew H
ires
5%5%
% U
nion
Rep
rese
nted
90%
93%
DO
HM
HCi
tyw
ide
DDO
HM
H
DO
HM
HCi
tyw
ide
## in
Age
ncy
% o
f Age
ncy
% o
f City
wid
eM
edia
n Ye
ars
of S
ervi
ce%
Ret
irem
ent
Elig
ible
% A
ttriti
on R
ate
% N
ew
Hire
s
317
5.5%
72.4
%5.
711
.7%
9.8%
7.6%
311
5.4%
100.
0%13
.223
.8%
5.2%
0.2%
267
4.6%
6.0%
20.0
40.1
%6.
8%1.
0%
235
4.1%
5.5%
13.2
36.2
%5.
7%0.
0%
234
4.1%
9.9%
7.7
28.6
%9.
9%3.
8%
232
4.0%
91.7
%4.
710
.3%
9.3%
6.6%
174
3.0%
49.4
%5.
64.
0%8.
9%7.
3%
170
3.0%
97.1
%8.
132
.4%
9.0%
3.2%
124
2.2%
87.9
%15
.531
.5%
3.1%
0.0%
101
1.8%
8.4%
19.8
51.5
%17
.7%
0.0%
Stat
us#
in A
genc
y%
of A
genc
yM
edia
n Ag
eM
edia
n Ye
ars
of S
ervi
ce%
Elig
ible
(2
012)
% E
ligib
le
(201
3 -
2017
)#
Elig
. (2
012
- 20
17)
New
Hire
s34
15.
4%33
.00.
734
.3%
20.7
%40
4
Dec
ease
d8
0.1%
55.1
16.7
29.0
%21
.4%
308
Dism
issal
s98
1.5%
41.7
3.2
21.9
%14
.8%
129
Layo
ffs28
0.4%
47.0
5.6
29.5
%21
.7%
1,62
6
Resig
ned
321
5.0%
35.0
2.8
11.6
%14
.0%
22
Retir
emen
t13
42.
1%64
.422
.134
.1%
19.3
%11
9
Sepa
ratio
n of
Tem
p. W
orke
rs0
0.0%
N/A
N/A
26.7
%28
.9%
25
N/A
N/A
N/A
19.4
%14
.4%
185
City
wid
e
Dep
artm
ent o
f Hea
lth a
nd M
enta
l Hyg
iene
: FY
12
Med
ian
Age
Wor
kfor
ce P
rofil
e
Th
e D
epar
tmen
t of H
ealth
and
Men
tal H
ygie
ne (D
OH
MH
) pro
tect
s and
pro
mot
es th
e he
alth
and
men
tal w
ell b
eing
of a
ll N
ew Y
orke
rs. T
he D
epar
tmen
t con
tract
s for
: men
tal h
ealth
serv
ices;
deve
lopm
enta
l disa
bilit
y se
rvice
s; al
coho
l and
dru
g us
e se
rvice
s; an
d Ea
rly
Inte
rven
tion
serv
ices t
o de
velo
pmen
tally
del
ayed
infa
nts a
nd to
ddle
rs. D
OH
MH
also
inclu
des t
he O
ffice
of C
hief
Med
ical E
xam
iner
(OCM
E), w
hich
is re
spon
sible
for i
nves
tigat
ing
deat
hs o
ccur
ring
in a
ny su
spici
ous o
r unu
sual
man
ner.
Empl
oyee
Typ
e
39.8
46.8
49.9
49.4
48.4
35.1
33.4
51.0
48.0
53.8
Activ
ity S
tatu
sRe
tirem
ent E
ligib
ility
Skille
d Cr
aft W
orke
rs
Teac
hers
Tech
nici
ans
Cate
gorie
s
Adm
inist
rativ
e Su
ppor
t
Offi
cial
s an
d Ad
min
istra
tors
Para
prof
essio
nals
Prof
essio
nals
N
/A a
ppea
rs w
here
the
popu
latio
n ha
s fe
wer
than
5 e
mpl
oyee
s or
ther
e ar
e no
reco
rds
avai
labl
e, a
nd th
eref
ore,
no
calc
ulat
ions
wer
e m
ade.
Dem
ogra
phic
s Full-
Tim
e Em
ploy
ee T
itle
City
Res
earc
h Sc
ient
ist
Publ
ic H
ealth
Adv
iser
Prin
cipa
l Adm
inist
rativ
e As
soci
ate
Cler
ical
Ass
ocia
te
Adm
inist
rativ
e St
aff A
naly
st
Publ
ic H
ealth
San
itaria
n
Crim
inal
ist
Hea
lth S
ervi
ces
Man
ager
Asso
ciat
e Pu
blic
Hea
lth S
anita
rian
Asso
ciat
e St
aff A
naly
st
Top
10 M
ost P
opul
ous
Full-
Tim
e Ti
tles
Prot
ectiv
e Se
rvic
e W
orke
rs
Serv
ice
Mai
nten
ance
$11
0,00
0
$10
3,65
1
$33
,183
$
31,8
28
$55
,333
$
65,2
99
DO
HM
HCi
tyw
ide
Ann
ual F
T Sa
lary
70%
57
%
30%
43
%
DO
HM
HCi
tyw
ide
Gen
der
Fem
ale
Mal
e
86%
5% 9%
Activ
eN
ew H
ires
Attri
tion
89%
5% 6%
45%
24%
31%
Perm
anen
t
Prov
ision
al
62%
7%
31%
100%
0%
Civil
ian
Unifo
rm
82%
18%
78%
22%
Full-
time
FTE
27%
39%
45%
32%
15%
20
%
12%
8%
DO
HM
HCi
tyw
ide
Ethn
icity
W
hite
Blac
kH
ispan
icAs
ian/
Pacif
ic Is
land
erAm
. Ind
ian/
Ala
skan
Nat
ive
93%
7%
29%
23%
18%
12%
9%
6%
2%
1%
0%
0 to
4
5 to
9
10 to
14
15 to
19
20 to
24
25 to
29
30 to
34
35 to
40
40
+
22%
23%
19%
12%
12%
7%
3%
1%
0%
Year
s of S
ervic
e
0%
2%
10%
12%
12%
15%
17%
15%
12%
6%
<
20
20 to
24
30 to
34
35 to
39
40 to
44
45 to
49
50 to
54
55 to
59
60 to
64
6
5+
1%
2%
13%
13%
15%
15%
15%
13%
8%
4%
Age
Agen
cy O
verv
iew
:
5th
to 9
5th
Perc
entil
e M
edia
n
Not
es:
72
IIndi
cato
rD
HS
City
wid
e
Hea
dcou
nt (F
T / F
TE)
1,81
8 / 1
304,
066
/ 23,
727
Med
ian
Age
/ Yea
rs o
f Ser
vice
49.1
/ 11
.945
.2 /
11.1
% M
ale
/ Fem
ale
53%
/ 47
%43
% /
57%
% W
hite
/ M
inor
ity14
% /
86%
39%
/ 61
%
Med
ian
Annu
al F
T Ba
se S
alar
y$4
6,37
8$6
5,29
9
% A
ttriti
on7%
6%
% E
ligib
le to
Ret
ire36
%19
%
% N
ew H
ires
6%5%
% U
nion
Rep
rese
nted
91%
93%
DH
SCi
tyw
ide
DDH
S
DH
SCi
tyw
ide
## in
Age
ncy
% o
f Age
ncy
% o
f City
wid
eM
edia
n Ye
ars
of S
ervi
ce%
Ret
irem
ent
Elig
ible
% A
ttriti
on R
ate
% N
ew
Hire
s
270
14.8
%60
.7%
4.4
5.2%
16.4
%14
.2%
140
7.7%
18.0
%26
.376
.4%
7.9%
2.0%
123
6.8%
5.1%
8.5
22.0
%2.
4%0.
0%
120
6.6%
14.7
%8.
823
.3%
5.5%
7.1%
100
5.5%
2.3%
23.1
55.0
%3.
8%4.
8%
955.
2%4.
0%13
.943
.2%
4.0%
5.1%
794.
3%4.
4%11
.546
.8%
3.7%
3.7%
754.
1%6.
8%8.
421
.3%
5.1%
17.7
%
754.
1%21
.9%
15.6
33.3
%3.
8%1.
3%
653.
6%87
.8%
21.9
55.4
%1.
5%3.
0%
Stat
us#
in A
genc
y%
of A
genc
yM
edia
n Ag
eM
edia
n Ye
ars
of S
ervi
ce%
Elig
ible
(2
012)
% E
ligib
le
(201
3 -
2017
)#
Elig
. (2
012
- 20
17)
New
Hire
s10
85.
7%31
.10.
352
.7%
14.0
%12
4
Dec
ease
d3
0.2%
N/A
N/A
41.8
%16
.4%
128
Dism
issal
s53
2.8%
37.1
3.5
44.4
%15
.7%
203
Layo
ffs0
0.0%
N/A
N/A
45.1
%18
.1%
185
Resig
ned
432.
3%38
.56.
04.
8%10
.2%
50
Retir
emen
t41
2.2%
63.0
26.2
56.0
%19
.8%
88
Sepa
ratio
n of
Tem
p. W
orke
rs0
0.0%
N/A
N/A
60.2
%33
.7%
78
N/A
N/A
N/A
18.8
%14
.4%
60
City
wid
e
Dep
artm
ent o
f Hom
eles
s Se
rvic
es: F
Y12
Med
ian
Age
Wor
kfor
ce P
rofil
e
Th
e D
epar
tmen
t of H
omel
ess S
ervic
es (D
HS)
man
ages
nin
e Ci
ty-r
un a
nd 2
22 p
rivat
ely-
run
shel
ter f
acilit
ies,
cons
istin
g of
64
adul
t fac
ilitie
s, 18
adu
lt fa
mily
facil
ities
and
149
facil
ities
for f
amilie
s with
chi
ldre
n. D
HS
also
pro
vides
out
reac
h se
rvice
s ava
ilabl
e 24
hou
rs a
day
, se
ven
days
a w
eek,
as w
ell a
s hom
eles
s pre
vent
ion
serv
ices
thro
ugh
com
mun
ity-b
ased
pro
gram
s kno
wn
as “H
ome
Base
”.
Empl
oyee
Typ
e
36.3
55.7
46.7
46.5
52.0
50.2
53.4
44.3
49.3
54.8
Activ
ity S
tatu
sRe
tirem
ent E
ligib
ility
Skille
d Cr
aft W
orke
rs
Teac
hers
Tech
nici
ans
Cate
gorie
s
Adm
inist
rativ
e Su
ppor
t
Offi
cial
s an
d Ad
min
istra
tors
Para
prof
essio
nals
Prof
essio
nals
N
/A a
ppea
rs w
here
the
popu
latio
n ha
s fe
wer
than
5 e
mpl
oyee
s or
ther
e ar
e no
reco
rds
avai
labl
e, a
nd th
eref
ore,
no
calc
ulat
ions
wer
e m
ade.
Dem
ogra
phic
s Full-
Tim
e Em
ploy
ee T
itle
Spec
ial O
ffice
r
Com
mun
ity A
ssist
ant
Com
mun
ity A
ssoc
iate
Frau
d In
vest
igat
or
Prin
cipa
l Adm
inist
rativ
e As
soci
ate
Adm
inist
rativ
e St
aff A
naly
st
Case
wor
ker
Com
mun
ity C
oord
inat
or
Adm
inist
rativ
e D
irect
or o
f Soc
ial S
ervi
ces
Assis
tant
Sup
erin
tend
ent o
f Wel
fare
She
lters
Top
10 M
ost P
opul
ous
Full-
Tim
e Ti
tles
Prot
ectiv
e Se
rvic
e W
orke
rs
Serv
ice
Mai
nten
ance
$91
,936
$
103,
651
$33
,296
$
31,8
28
$46
,378
$65
,299
DH
SCi
tyw
ide
Ann
ual F
T Sa
lary
47%
57
%
53%
43
%
DH
SCi
tyw
ide
Gen
der
Fem
ale
Mal
e
87%
6% 7%
Ac
tive
New
Hire
sAt
tritio
n89
%
5% 6%
62%
15%
22
%
Perm
anen
t
Prov
ision
al
62%
7%
31%
100%
0%
Civil
ian
Unifo
rm
82%
18%
100%
0%
Full-
time
FTE
14%
39%
65%
32%
17%
20%
3%
8%
DH
SCi
tyw
ide
Ethn
icity
W
hite
Blac
kH
ispan
icAs
ian/
Pacif
ic Is
land
erAm
. Ind
ian/
Ala
skan
Nat
ive
93%
7%
20%
23%
15%
5%
16%
17%
3%
1%
0%
0 to
4
5 to
9
10 to
14
15 to
19
20 to
24
25 to
29
30 to
34
35 to
40
40
+
22%
23%
19%
12%
12%
7%
3%
1%
0%
Year
s of S
ervic
e
0%
2%
9%
11%
12%
16%
18%
17%
9%
5%
<
20
20 to
24
30 to
34
35 to
39
40 to
44
45 to
49
50 to
54
55 to
59
60 to
64
6
5+
1%
2%
13%
13%
15%
15%
15%
13%
8%
4%
Age
Agen
cy O
verv
iew
:
5th
to 9
5th
Perc
entil
e M
edia
n
Not
es:
73
IIndi
cato
rH
PDCi
tyw
ide
Hea
dcou
nt (F
T / F
TE)
2,10
5 / 4
830
4,06
6 / 2
3,72
7
Med
ian
Age
/ Yea
rs o
f Ser
vice
53.3
/ 17
.345
.2 /
11.1
% M
ale
/ Fem
ale
51%
/ 49
%43
% /
57%
% W
hite
/ M
inor
ity26
% /
74%
39%
/ 61
%
Med
ian
Annu
al F
T Ba
se S
alar
y$5
2,66
2$6
5,29
9
% A
ttriti
on7%
6%
% E
ligib
le to
Ret
ire48
%19
%
% N
ew H
ires
1%5%
% U
nion
Rep
rese
nted
91%
93%
HPD
City
wid
e
HHPD
HPD
City
wid
e
## in
Age
ncy
% o
f Age
ncy
% o
f City
wid
eM
edia
n Ye
ars
of S
ervi
ce%
Ret
irem
ent
Elig
ible
% A
ttriti
on R
ate
% N
ew
Hire
s
305
14.2
%99
.3%
8.1
36.7
%3.
5%0.
3%
201
9.3%
4.5%
24.8
60.7
%7.
3%0.
0%
177
8.2%
34.0
%22
.763
.8%
8.8%
0.0%
174
8.1%
7.2%
8.2
24.1
%3.
8%0.
5%
167
7.8%
3.9%
14.1
43.1
%7.
5%0.
0%
103
4.8%
4.4%
19.1
45.6
%8.
0%0.
0%
713.
3%95
.9%
25.8
80.3
%7.
8%0.
0%
693.
2%6.
3%14
.733
.3%
5.5%
0.0%
653.
0%8.
4%8.
235
.4%
6.1%
0.0%
542.
5%91
.5%
23.2
61.1
%5.
2%5.
2%
Stat
us#
in A
genc
y%
of A
genc
yM
edia
n Ag
eM
edia
n Ye
ars
of S
ervi
ce%
Elig
ible
(2
012)
% E
ligib
le
(201
3 -
2017
)#
Elig
. (2
012
- 20
17)
New
Hire
s14
0.6%
32.0
0.4
52.0
%19
.8%
312
Dec
ease
d9
0.4%
62.5
26.4
57.0
%17
.6%
297
Dism
issal
s19
0.8%
51.1
10.5
28.9
%15
.8%
147
Layo
ffs20
0.9%
50.3
10.1
49.2
%20
.5%
626
Resig
ned
251.
1%34
.65.
6N
/AN
/AN
/A
Retir
emen
t75
3.3%
63.5
26.1
44.4
%11
.1%
5
Sepa
ratio
n of
Tem
p. W
orke
rs0
0.0%
N/A
N/A
59.5
%19
.0%
33
N/A
N/A
N/A
23.1
%0.
0%3
City
wid
e
Dep
artm
ent o
f Hou
sing
Pres
erva
tion
and
Dev
elop
men
t : F
Y12
Med
ian
Age
Wor
kfor
ce P
rofil
e
Us
ing
a va
riety
of p
rese
rvat
ion,
dev
elop
men
t and
enf
orce
men
t stra
tegi
es, t
he D
epar
tmen
t of H
ousin
g Pr
eser
vatio
n an
d D
evel
opm
ent (
HPD
) stri
ves t
o im
prov
e th
e av
aila
bilit
y, a
fford
abilit
y, a
nd q
ualit
y of
hou
sing
in N
ew Y
ork
City
. As t
he n
atio
n’s l
arge
st m
unici
pal h
ousin
g ag
ency
, HPD
wor
ks w
ith p
rivat
e, p
ublic
and
com
mun
ity p
artn
ers t
o st
reng
then
nei
ghbo
rhoo
ds a
nd e
xpan
d th
e su
pply
and
affo
rdab
ility
of th
e Ci
ty’s
hous
ing
stoc
k an
d ke
ep p
eopl
e in
thei
r hom
es.
Empl
oyee
Typ
e
52.6
53.5
56.5
46.7
51.6
51.5
58.6
51.3
52.7
56.7
Activ
ity S
tatu
sRe
tirem
ent E
ligib
ility
Skille
d Cr
aft W
orke
rs
Teac
hers
Tech
nici
ans
Cate
gorie
s
Adm
inist
rativ
e Su
ppor
t
Offi
cial
s an
d Ad
min
istra
tors
Para
prof
essio
nals
Prof
essio
nals
N
/A a
ppea
rs w
here
the
popu
latio
n ha
s fe
wer
than
5 e
mpl
oyee
s or
ther
e ar
e no
reco
rds
avai
labl
e, a
nd th
eref
ore,
no
calc
ulat
ions
wer
e m
ade.
Dem
ogra
phic
s Full-
Tim
e Em
ploy
ee T
itle
Insp
ecto
r (H
ousin
g)
Prin
cipa
l Adm
inist
rativ
e As
soci
ate
Cons
truct
ion
Proj
ect M
anag
er
Com
mun
ity A
ssoc
iate
Cler
ical
Ass
ocia
te
Adm
inist
rativ
e St
aff A
naly
st
Real
Pro
perty
Man
ager
Com
mun
ity C
oord
inat
or
Com
mun
ity A
ssist
ant
Hou
sing
Dev
elop
men
t Spe
cial
ist
Top
10 M
ost P
opul
ous
Full-
Tim
e Ti
tles
Prot
ectiv
e Se
rvic
e W
orke
rs
Serv
ice
Mai
nten
ance
$96
,922
$
103,
651
$32
,321
$
31,8
28
$52
,662
$65
,299
HPD
City
wid
e
Ann
ual F
T Sa
lary
49%
57
%
51%
43
%
HPD
City
wid
e
Gen
der
Fem
ale
Mal
e
93%
1% 6%
Ac
tive
New
Hire
sAt
tritio
n89
%
5% 6%
62%
18%
20
%
Perm
anen
t
Prov
ision
al
62%
7%
31%
100%
0%
Civil
ian
Unifo
rm
82%
18%
98%
2%
Full-
time
FTE
26%
39%
47%
32%
18%
20
%
9%
8%
HPD
City
wid
e
Ethn
icity
W
hite
Blac
kH
ispan
icAs
ian/
Pacif
ic Is
land
erAm
. Ind
ian/
Ala
skan
Nat
ive
93%
7%
11%
26%
11%
6%
18%
17%
8%
2%
1%
0 to
4
5 to
9
10 to
14
15 to
19
20 to
24
25 to
29
30 to
34
35 to
40
40
+
22%
23%
19%
12%
12%
7%
3%
1%
0%
Year
s of S
ervic
e
0%
0%
7%
7%
9%
14%
21%
20%
16%
6%
<
20
20 to
24
30 to
34
35 to
39
40 to
44
45 to
49
50 to
54
55 to
59
60 to
64
6
5+
1%
2%
13%
13%
15%
15%
15%
13%
8%
4%
Age
Agen
cy O
verv
iew
:
5th
to 9
5th
Perc
entil
e M
edia
n
Not
es:
74
IIndi
cato
rD
OIT
TCi
tyw
ide
Hea
dcou
nt (F
T / F
TE)
1,04
1 / 6
630
4,06
6 / 2
3,72
7
Med
ian
Age
/ Yea
rs o
f Ser
vice
45.2
/ 6.
445
.2 /
11.1
% M
ale
/ Fem
ale
59%
/ 41
%43
% /
57%
% W
hite
/ M
inor
ity40
% /
60%
39%
/ 61
%
Med
ian
Annu
al F
T Ba
se S
alar
y$7
1,19
6$6
5,29
9
% A
ttriti
on12
%6%
% E
ligib
le to
Ret
ire20
%19
%
% N
ew H
ires
7%5%
% U
nion
Rep
rese
nted
65%
93%
DO
ITT
City
wid
e
DDO
ITT
DO
ITT
City
wid
e
## in
Age
ncy
% o
f Age
ncy
% o
f City
wid
eM
edia
n Ye
ars
of S
ervi
ce%
Ret
irem
ent
Elig
ible
% A
ttriti
on R
ate
% N
ew
Hire
s
257
23.2
%36
.1%
4.6
8.6%
10.1
%10
.1%
159
14.4
%10
0.0%
6.3
14.5
%14
.1%
0.5%
605.
4%5.
8%20
.753
.3%
11.8
%10
.5%
585.
2%2.
5%10
.431
.0%
4.8%
4.8%
555.
0%8.
0%7.
621
.8%
1.7%
5.2%
433.
9%53
.8%
7.0
27.9
%2.
0%3.
9%
383.
4%10
0.0%
7.6
10.5
%22
.4%
0.0%
383.
4%1.
6%4.
22.
6%13
.0%
8.7%
252.
3%10
.7%
7.0
20.0
%3.
7%7.
4%
211.
9%0.
5%19
.638
.1%
12.0
%0.
0%
Stat
us#
in A
genc
y%
of A
genc
yM
edia
n Ag
eM
edia
n Ye
ars
of S
ervi
ce%
Elig
ible
(2
012)
% E
ligib
le
(201
3 -
2017
)#
Elig
. (2
012
- 20
17)
New
Hire
s82
6.8%
37.1
0.4
17.6
%18
.4%
88
Dec
ease
d0
0.0%
N/A
N/A
16.3
%19
.4%
127
Dism
issal
s28
2.3%
32.4
1.2
5.9%
5.9%
8
Layo
ffs24
2.0%
45.2
10.2
28.6
%16
.2%
155
Resig
ned
675.
5%37
.23.
3N
/AN
/AN
/A
Retir
emen
t22
1.8%
63.3
21.9
N/A
N/A
N/A
Sepa
ratio
n of
Tem
p. W
orke
rs0
0.0%
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
12.5
%16
.1%
16
City
wid
e
Dep
artm
ent o
f Inf
orm
atio
n Te
chno
logy
and
Tel
ecom
mun
icat
ions
: FY
12
Med
ian
Age
Wor
kfor
ce P
rofil
e
Th
e D
epar
tmen
t of I
nfor
mat
ion
Tech
nolo
gy a
nd T
elec
omm
unica
tions
(DoI
TT) i
s the
City
’s In
form
atio
n Te
chno
logy
(IT)
util
ity, e
nsur
ing
the
sust
aine
d, e
fficie
nt d
elive
ry o
f IT
serv
ices,
infra
stru
ctur
e an
d te
leco
mm
unica
tion
serv
ices.
DoI
TT a
lso in
clude
s the
311
Cus
tom
er
Serv
ice C
ente
r, w
hich
pro
vides
the
publ
ic w
ith q
uick
, eas
y ac
cess
to n
on-e
mer
genc
y go
vern
men
t ser
vices
and
info
rmat
ion
thro
ugh
the
call
cent
er, 3
11 O
nlin
e, 3
11 F
aceb
ook,
311
on
Twitt
er, a
nd te
xt m
essa
ging
at 3
11-N
YC(6
92).
Empl
oyee
Typ
e
46.3
46.5
54.3
47.6
40.8
49.8
37.6
31.6
39.1
51.5
Activ
ity S
tatu
sRe
tirem
ent E
ligib
ility
Skille
d Cr
aft W
orke
rs
Teac
hers
Tech
nici
ans
Cate
gorie
s
Adm
inist
rativ
e Su
ppor
t
Offi
cial
s an
d Ad
min
istra
tors
Para
prof
essio
nals
Prof
essio
nals
N
/A a
ppea
rs w
here
the
popu
latio
n ha
s fe
wer
than
5 e
mpl
oyee
s or
ther
e ar
e no
reco
rds
avai
labl
e, a
nd th
eref
ore,
no
calc
ulat
ions
wer
e m
ade.
Dem
ogra
phic
s Full-
Tim
e Em
ploy
ee T
itle
Com
pute
r Sys
tem
s M
anag
er
Call
Cent
er R
epre
sent
ativ
e
Com
pute
r Spe
cial
ist (S
oftw
are)
Adm
inist
rativ
e St
aff A
naly
st
Adm
inist
rativ
e M
anag
er
Tele
com
mun
icat
ions
Ass
ocia
te (D
ata)
Asso
ciat
e Ca
ll Ce
nter
Rep
rese
ntat
ive
Com
mun
ity A
ssoc
iate
Com
pute
r Ass
ocia
te (T
echn
ical
Sup
port)
Prin
cipa
l Adm
inist
rativ
e As
soci
ate
Top
10 M
ost P
opul
ous
Full-
Tim
e Ti
tles
Prot
ectiv
e Se
rvic
e W
orke
rs
Serv
ice
Mai
nten
ance
$13
2,58
1
$10
3,65
1
$34
,017
$
31,8
28
$71
,196
$
65,2
99
DO
ITT
City
wid
e
Ann
ual F
T Sa
lary
41%
57
%
59%
43
%
DO
ITT
City
wid
e
Gen
der
Fem
ale
Mal
e
81%
7%
12%
Activ
eN
ew H
ires
Attri
tion
89%
5% 6%
29%
62%
9%
Pe
rman
ent
Prov
ision
al
62%
7%
31%
100%
0%
Civil
ian
Unifo
rm
82%
18%
94%
6%
Full-
time
FTE
40%
39
%
31%
32
%
12%
20
%
16%
8%
DO
ITT
City
wid
e
Ethn
icity
W
hite
Blac
kH
ispan
icAs
ian/
Pacif
ic Is
land
erAm
. Ind
ian/
Ala
skan
Nat
ive
93%
7%
40%
32%
9%
4%
6%
5%
3%
1%
0%
0 to
4
5 to
9
10 to
14
15 to
19
20 to
24
25 to
29
30 to
34
35 to
40
40
+
22%
23%
19%
12%
12%
7%
3%
1%
0%
Year
s of S
ervic
e
0%
2%
13%
16%
14%
16%
14%
11%
9%
4%
<
20
20 to
24
30 to
34
35 to
39
40 to
44
45 to
49
50 to
54
55 to
59
60 to
64
6
5+
1%
2%
13%
13%
15%
15%
15%
13%
8%
4%
Age
Agen
cy O
verv
iew
:
5th
to 9
5th
Perc
entil
e M
edia
n
Not
es:
75
IIndi
cato
rD
OI
City
wid
e
Hea
dcou
nt (F
T / F
TE)
191
/ 130
4,06
6 / 2
3,72
7
Med
ian
Age
/ Yea
rs o
f Ser
vice
49.7
/ 20
.645
.2 /
11.1
% M
ale
/ Fem
ale
41%
/ 59
%43
% /
57%
% W
hite
/ M
inor
ity41
% /
59%
39%
/ 61
%
Med
ian
Annu
al F
T Ba
se S
alar
y$6
7,74
6$6
5,29
9
% A
ttriti
on7%
6%
% E
ligib
le to
Ret
ire43
%19
%
% N
ew H
ires
3%5%
% U
nion
Rep
rese
nted
49%
93%
DO
ICi
tyw
ide
DDO
I
DO
ICi
tyw
ide
## in
Age
ncy
% o
f Age
ncy
% o
f City
wid
eM
edia
n Ye
ars
of S
ervi
ce%
Ret
irem
ent
Elig
ible
% A
ttriti
on R
ate
% N
ew
Hire
s
5327
.6%
35.8
%13
.924
.5%
10.2
%3.
4%
2814
.6%
100.
0%24
.957
.1%
3.4%
0.0%
157.
8%75
.0%
23.6
46.7
%0.
0%0.
0%
147.
3%6.
8%8.
628
.6%
17.6
%11
.8%
115.
7%0.
2%28
.081
.8%
0.0%
0.0%
105.
2%1.
5%28
.170
.0%
9.1%
0.0%
84.
2%1.
0%4.
912
.5%
0.0%
0.0%
73.
6%10
0.0%
8.6
14.3
%0.
0%28
.6%
73.
6%0.
2%26
.685
.7%
0.0%
0.0%
73.
6%0.
3%12
.028
.6%
0.0%
0.0%
Stat
us#
in A
genc
y%
of A
genc
yM
edia
n Ag
eM
edia
n Ye
ars
of S
ervi
ce%
Elig
ible
(2
012)
% E
ligib
le
(201
3 -
2017
)#
Elig
. (2
012
- 20
17)
New
Hire
s7
3.4%
29.7
0.5
76.0
%16
.0%
23
Dec
ease
d0
0.0%
N/A
N/A
31.4
%25
.7%
20
Dism
issal
s1
0.5%
N/A
N/A
18.8
%12
.5%
5
Layo
ffs0
0.0%
N/A
N/A
57.6
%9.
1%22
Resig
ned
125.
9%35
.44.
8N
/AN
/AN
/A
Retir
emen
t2
1.0%
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Sepa
ratio
n of
Tem
p. W
orke
rs0
0.0%
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
35.8
%14
.8%
41
City
wid
e
Dep
artm
ent o
f Inv
estig
atio
n: F
Y12
Med
ian
Age
Wor
kfor
ce P
rofil
e
Th
e D
epar
tmen
t of I
nves
tigat
ion
(DO
I) pr
omot
es a
nd m
aint
ains
inte
grity
and
effi
cienc
y in
City
gov
ernm
ent o
pera
tions
by
inve
stig
atin
g an
d re
ferri
ng fo
r pro
secu
tion
City
em
ploy
ees a
nd c
ontra
ctor
s eng
aged
in c
orru
pt a
ctivi
ties o
r une
thica
l con
duct
. It h
as o
vers
ight
of
mor
e th
an 4
5 M
ayor
al a
genc
ies,
as w
ell C
ity b
oard
s and
com
miss
ions
. DO
I stu
dies
City
age
ncie
s vul
nera
bilit
ies t
o de
term
ine
if co
rrect
ive a
ctio
n is
nece
ssar
y an
d re
com
men
ds a
ctio
ns to
pre
vent
crim
inal
misc
ondu
ct a
nd w
aste
.
Empl
oyee
Typ
e
43.0
53.3
50.6
44.9
58.1
52.9
39.7
34.3
56.7
37.1
Activ
ity S
tatu
sRe
tirem
ent E
ligib
ility
Skille
d Cr
aft W
orke
rs
Teac
hers
Tech
nici
ans
Cate
gorie
s
Adm
inist
rativ
e Su
ppor
t
Offi
cial
s an
d Ad
min
istra
tors
Para
prof
essio
nals
Prof
essio
nals
N
/A a
ppea
rs w
here
the
popu
latio
n ha
s fe
wer
than
5 e
mpl
oyee
s or
ther
e ar
e no
reco
rds
avai
labl
e, a
nd th
eref
ore,
no
calc
ulat
ions
wer
e m
ade.
Dem
ogra
phic
s Full-
Tim
e Em
ploy
ee T
itle
Conf
iden
tial I
nves
tigat
or
Spec
ial I
nves
tigat
or
Dep
uty
Insp
ecto
r Gen
eral
Insp
ecto
r
Prin
cipa
l Adm
inist
rativ
e As
soci
ate
Adm
inist
rativ
e M
anag
er
Com
mun
ity A
ssist
ant
Exam
inin
g At
torn
ey
Cler
ical
Ass
ocia
te
Com
mun
ity A
ssoc
iate
Top
10 M
ost P
opul
ous
Full-
Tim
e Ti
tles
Prot
ectiv
e Se
rvic
e W
orke
rs
Serv
ice
Mai
nten
ance
$13
0,00
0
$10
3,65
1
$31
,885
$
31,8
28
$67
,746
$
65,2
99
DO
ICi
tyw
ide
Ann
ual F
T Sa
lary
59%
57
%
41%
43
%
DO
ICi
tyw
ide
Gen
der
Fem
ale
Mal
e
89%
4% 7%
Ac
tive
New
Hire
sAt
tritio
n89
%
5% 6%
22%
4%
75%
Pe
rman
ent
Prov
ision
al
62%
7%
31%
100%
0%
Civil
ian
Unifo
rm
82%
18%
99%
1%
Full-
time
FTE
41%
39
%
31%
32
%
18%
20
%
10%
8%
DO
ICi
tyw
ide
Ethn
icity
W
hite
Blac
kH
ispan
icAs
ian/
Pacif
ic Is
land
erAm
. Ind
ian/
Ala
skan
Nat
ive
93%
7%
15%
16%
11%
8%
18%
20%
9%
1%
2%
0 to
4
5 to
9
10 to
14
15 to
19
20 to
24
25 to
29
30 to
34
35 to
40
40
+
22%
23%
19%
12%
12%
7%
3%
1%
0%
Year
s of S
ervic
e
0%
0%
8%
9%
12%
16%
22%
16%
10%
6%
<
20
20 to
24
30 to
34
35 to
39
40 to
44
45 to
49
50 to
54
55 to
59
60 to
64
6
5+
1%
2%
13%
13%
15%
15%
15%
13%
8%
4%
Age
Agen
cy O
verv
iew
:
5th
to 9
5th
Perc
entil
e M
edia
n
Not
es:
76
IIndi
cato
rD
PRCi
tyw
ide
Hea
dcou
nt (F
T / F
TE)
3,09
5 / 2
,503
304,
066
/ 23,
727
Med
ian
Age
/ Yea
rs o
f Ser
vice
38.8
/ 4
45.2
/ 11
.1
% M
ale
/ Fem
ale
57%
/ 43
%43
% /
57%
% W
hite
/ M
inor
ity31
% /
69%
39%
/ 61
%
Med
ian
Annu
al F
T Ba
se S
alar
y$5
0,64
7$6
5,29
9
% A
ttriti
on31
%6%
% E
ligib
le to
Ret
ire14
%19
%
% N
ew H
ires
23%
5%
% U
nion
Rep
rese
nted
64%
93%
DPR
City
wid
e
DDPR
DPR
City
wid
e
## in
Age
ncy
% o
f Age
ncy
% o
f City
wid
eM
edia
n Ye
ars
of S
ervi
ce%
Ret
irem
ent
Elig
ible
% A
ttriti
on R
ate
% N
ew
Hire
s
501
8.9%
100.
0%11
.242
.3%
16.4
%0.
6%
360
6.4%
100.
0%19
.145
.0%
2.9%
0.0%
250
4.5%
100.
0%20
.651
.2%
9.1%
0.0%
128
2.3%
5.3%
6.3
13.3
%13
.2%
1.5%
113
2.0%
10.3
%11
.715
.0%
6.8%
0.0%
931.
7%97
.9%
6.3
32.3
%11
.2%
0.0%
921.
6%92
.0%
10.9
28.3
%0.
0%0.
0%
891.
6%2.
1%10
.932
.6%
12.0
%0.
0%
891.
6%10
0.0%
9.2
5.6%
2.0%
0.0%
851.
5%3.
6%12
.720
.0%
5.2%
1.0%
Stat
us#
in A
genc
y%
of A
genc
yM
edia
n Ag
eM
edia
n Ye
ars
of S
ervi
ce%
Elig
ible
(2
012)
% E
ligib
le
(201
3 -
2017
)#
Elig
. (2
012
- 20
17)
New
Hire
s2,
853
23.4
%31
.00.
131
.8%
10.9
%94
Dec
ease
d13
0.1%
54.7
11.7
28.5
%16
.0%
156
Dism
issal
s76
86.
3%31
.60.
313
.3%
9.9%
75
Layo
ffs0
0.0%
N/A
N/A
20.9
%13
.9%
253
Resig
ned
689
5.7%
32.7
0.4
3.6%
2.3%
99
Retir
emen
t57
0.5%
62.8
25.5
13.8
%6.
8%1,
000
Sepa
ratio
n of
Tem
p. W
orke
rs2,
254
18.5
%38
.7N
/A41
.4%
17.3
%13
9
N/A
N/A
N/A
20.7
%10
.3%
9
DPR
em
ploy
s a
signi
fican
t num
ber o
f par
t-tim
e an
d se
ason
al e
mpl
oyee
s th
at c
ycle
in a
nd o
ut a
t diff
eren
t tim
es o
f the
yea
r, w
hich
may
influ
ence
the
inte
rpre
tatio
n of
the
data
abo
ve.
City
wid
e
Dep
artm
ent o
f Par
ks a
nd R
ecre
atio
n: F
Y12
Med
ian
Age
Wor
kfor
ce P
rofil
e
Th
e D
epar
tmen
t of P
arks
& R
ecre
atio
n (D
PR) m
aint
ains
a m
unici
pal p
ark
syst
em o
f mor
e th
an 2
9,00
0 ac
res,
inclu
ding
mor
e th
an p
arks
1,9
00 p
arks
and
ove
r 1,0
00 p
layg
roun
ds. D
PR fa
ciliti
es ra
nge
from
com
mun
ity a
nd re
crea
tion
cent
ers t
o go
lf co
urse
s and
swim
min
g po
lls th
roug
hout
the
five
boro
ughs
. The
Dep
artm
ent i
s also
resp
onsib
le fo
r app
roxim
atel
y 65
0,00
0 st
reet
tree
s and
two
milli
on p
ark
trees
.
Empl
oyee
Typ
e
52.3
49.5
52.5
39.2
42.8
50.4
46.5
43.9
41.0
40.8
Activ
ity S
tatu
sRe
tirem
ent E
ligib
ility
Skille
d Cr
aft W
orke
rs
Teac
hers
Tech
nici
ans
Cate
gorie
s
Adm
inist
rativ
e Su
ppor
t
Offi
cial
s an
d Ad
min
istra
tors
Para
prof
essio
nals
Prof
essio
nals
N
/A a
ppea
rs w
here
the
popu
latio
n ha
s fe
wer
than
5 e
mpl
oyee
s or
ther
e ar
e no
reco
rds
avai
labl
e, a
nd th
eref
ore,
no
calc
ulat
ions
wer
e m
ade.
Dem
ogra
phic
s Full-
Tim
e Em
ploy
ee T
itle
City
Par
k W
orke
r
Park
Sup
ervi
sor
Asso
ciat
e Pa
rk S
ervi
ce W
orke
r
Com
mun
ity A
ssoc
iate
Com
mun
ity C
oord
inat
or
Gar
dene
r
Clim
ber a
nd P
rune
r
Cler
ical
Ass
ocia
te
Asso
ciat
e Ur
ban
Park
Ran
ger
Adm
inist
rativ
e St
aff A
naly
st
Top
10 M
ost P
opul
ous
Full-
Tim
e Ti
tles
Prot
ectiv
e Se
rvic
e W
orke
rs
Serv
ice
Mai
nten
ance
$91
,936
$
103,
651
$33
,662
$
31,8
28
$50
,647
$65
,299
DPR
City
wid
e
Ann
ual F
T Sa
lary
43%
57
%
57%
43
%
DPR
City
wid
e
Gen
der
Fem
ale
Mal
e
46%
23%
31%
Activ
eN
ew H
ires
Attri
tion
89%
5% 6%
15%
11%
74%
Pe
rman
ent
Prov
ision
al
62%
7%
31%
100%
0%
Civil
ian
Unifo
rm
82%
18%
55%
45%
Full-
time
FTE
31%
39
%
42%
32
%
23%
20
%
4%
8%
DPR
City
wid
e
Ethn
icity
W
hite
Blac
kH
ispan
icAs
ian/
Pacif
ic Is
land
erAm
. Ind
ian/
Ala
skan
Nat
ive
93%
7%
56%
17%
10%
4%
5%
5%
2%
1%
0%
0 to
4
5 to
9
10 to
14
15 to
19
20 to
24
25 to
29
30 to
34
35 to
40
40
+
22%
23%
19%
12%
12%
7%
3%
1%
0%
Year
s of S
ervic
e
10%
16%
10%
10%
11%
13%
13%
10%
5%
3%
<
20
20 to
24
30 to
34
35 to
39
40 to
44
45 to
49
50 to
54
55 to
59
60 to
64
6
5+
1%
2%
13%
13%
15%
15%
15%
13%
8%
4%
Age
Agen
cy O
verv
iew
:
5th
to 9
5th
Perc
entil
e M
edia
n
Not
es:
77
IIndi
cato
rD
OP
City
wid
e
Hea
dcou
nt (F
T / F
TE)
976
/ 030
4,06
6 / 2
3,72
7
Med
ian
Age
/ Yea
rs o
f Ser
vice
49.6
/ 22
.145
.2 /
11.1
% M
ale
/ Fem
ale
31%
/ 69
%43
% /
57%
% W
hite
/ M
inor
ity18
% /
82%
39%
/ 61
%
Med
ian
Annu
al F
T Ba
se S
alar
y$5
6,95
2$6
5,29
9
% A
ttriti
on5%
6%
% E
ligib
le to
Ret
ire36
%19
%
% N
ew H
ires
2%5%
% U
nion
Rep
rese
nted
92%
93%
DO
PCi
tyw
ide
DDO
P
DO
PCi
tyw
ide
## in
Age
ncy
% o
f Age
ncy
% o
f City
wid
eM
edia
n Ye
ars
of S
ervi
ce%
Ret
irem
ent
Elig
ible
% A
ttriti
on R
ate
% N
ew
Hire
s
502
51.4
%10
0.0%
20.0
30.3
%3.
3%0.
4%
165
16.9
%10
0.0%
23.4
35.2
%3.
5%0.
0%
636.
5%1.
5%23
.965
.1%
4.5%
0.0%
525.
3%1.
2%23
.250
.0%
3.7%
0.0%
414.
2%10
0.0%
23.2
39.0
%4.
7%0.
0%
383.
9%3.
3%24
.463
.2%
9.5%
0.0%
212.
2%0.
9%21
.742
.9%
4.5%
9.1%
151.
5%0.
6%16
.533
.3%
0.0%
0.0%
80.
8%0.
7%26
.162
.5%
11.1
%0.
0%
70.
7%0.
7%19
.242
.9%
0.0%
0.0%
Stat
us#
in A
genc
y%
of A
genc
yM
edia
n Ag
eM
edia
n Ye
ars
of S
ervi
ce%
Elig
ible
(2
012)
% E
ligib
le
(201
3 -
2017
)#
Elig
. (2
012
- 20
17)
New
Hire
s21
2.0%
23.4
0.0
59.7
%27
.3%
134
Dec
ease
d1
0.1%
N/A
N/A
36.5
%32
.4%
51
Dism
issal
s1
0.1%
N/A
N/A
23.5
%8.
8%11
Layo
ffs14
1.4%
33.9
3.4
31.5
%35
.0%
473
Resig
ned
40.
4%N
/AN
/AN
/AN
/AN
/A
Retir
emen
t32
3.1%
62.6
27.3
50.0
%0.
0%1
Sepa
ratio
n of
Tem
p. W
orke
rs0
0.0%
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.0%
33.3
%1
City
wid
e
Dep
artm
ent o
f Pro
batio
n: F
Y12
Med
ian
Age
Wor
kfor
ce P
rofil
e
Th
e D
epar
tmen
t of P
roba
tion
(DO
P) h
elps
bui
ld st
rong
er a
nd sa
fer c
omm
uniti
es b
y w
orkin
g w
ith a
nd su
perv
ising
peo
ple
on p
roba
tion,
fost
erin
g po
sitive
cha
nge
in th
eir d
ecisi
on-m
akin
g an
d be
havio
r and
exp
andi
ng o
ppor
tuni
ties f
or th
em to
mov
e ou
t of t
he c
rimin
al
and
juve
nile
just
ice sy
stem
s thr
ough
mea
ning
ful e
duca
tion,
em
ploy
men
t, he
alth
serv
ices,
fam
ily e
ngag
emen
t and
civi
c pa
rticip
atio
n.
Empl
oyee
Typ
e
48.5
49.5
55.0
51.7
49.4
54.7
51.4
49.0
56.5
51.6
Activ
ity S
tatu
sRe
tirem
ent E
ligib
ility
Skille
d Cr
aft W
orke
rs
Teac
hers
Tech
nici
ans
Cate
gorie
s
Adm
inist
rativ
e Su
ppor
t
Offi
cial
s an
d Ad
min
istra
tors
Para
prof
essio
nals
Prof
essio
nals
N
/A a
ppea
rs w
here
the
popu
latio
n ha
s fe
wer
than
5 e
mpl
oyee
s or
ther
e ar
e no
reco
rds
avai
labl
e, a
nd th
eref
ore,
no
calc
ulat
ions
wer
e m
ade.
Dem
ogra
phic
s Full-
Tim
e Em
ploy
ee T
itle
Prob
atio
n O
ffice
r
Supe
rvisi
ng P
roba
tion
Offi
cer
Cler
ical
Ass
ocia
te
Prin
cipa
l Adm
inist
rativ
e As
soci
ate
Adm
inist
rativ
e Pr
obat
ion
Offi
cer
Secr
etar
y
Adm
inist
rativ
e St
aff A
naly
st
Com
mun
ity A
ssoc
iate
Asso
ciat
e St
aff A
naly
st
Com
pute
r Spe
cial
ist (S
oftw
are)
Top
10 M
ost P
opul
ous
Full-
Tim
e Ti
tles
Prot
ectiv
e Se
rvic
e W
orke
rs
Serv
ice
Mai
nten
ance
$86
,363
$10
3,65
1
$35
,357
$
31,8
28
$56
,952
$
65,2
99
DO
PCi
tyw
ide
Ann
ual F
T Sa
lary
69%
57
%
31%
43
%
DO
PCi
tyw
ide
Gen
der
Fem
ale
Mal
e
93%
2% 5%
Ac
tive
New
Hire
sAt
tritio
n89
%
5% 6%
91%
4%
5%
Perm
anen
t
Prov
ision
al
62%
7%
31%
100%
0%
Civil
ian
Unifo
rm
82%
18%
100%
0%
Full-
time
FTE
18%
39%
66%
32
%
13%
20%
3%
8%
DO
PCi
tyw
ide
Ethn
icity
W
hite
Blac
kH
ispan
icAs
ian/
Pacif
ic Is
land
erAm
. Ind
ian/
Ala
skan
Nat
ive
93%
7%
8%
7%
12%
15%
37%
15%
5%
1%
1%
0 to
4
5 to
9
10 to
14
15 to
19
20 to
24
25 to
29
30 to
34
35 to
40
40
+
22%
23%
19%
12%
12%
7%
3%
1%
0%
Year
s of S
ervic
e
1%
1%
3%
5%
12%
29%
22%
14%
8%
4%
<
20
20 to
24
30 to
34
35 to
39
40 to
44
45 to
49
50 to
54
55 to
59
60 to
64
6
5+
1%
2%
13%
13%
15%
15%
15%
13%
8%
4%
Age
Agen
cy O
verv
iew
:
5th
to 9
5th
Perc
entil
e M
edia
n
Not
es:
78
IIndi
cato
rD
ORI
SCi
tyw
ide
Hea
dcou
nt (F
T / F
TE)
39 /
1230
4,06
6 / 2
3,72
7
Med
ian
Age
/ Yea
rs o
f Ser
vice
51.4
/ 11
.845
.2 /
11.1
% M
ale
/ Fem
ale
44%
/ 54
%43
% /
57%
% W
hite
/ M
inor
ity49
% /
51%
39%
/ 61
%
Med
ian
Annu
al F
T Ba
se S
alar
y$4
4,42
7$6
5,29
9
% A
ttriti
on5%
6%
% E
ligib
le to
Ret
ire50
%19
%
% N
ew H
ires
16%
5%
% U
nion
Rep
rese
nted
89%
93%
DO
RIS
City
wid
e
DDO
RIS
DO
RIS
City
wid
e
## in
Age
ncy
% o
f Age
ncy
% o
f City
wid
eM
edia
n Ye
ars
of S
ervi
ce%
Ret
irem
ent
Elig
ible
% A
ttriti
on R
ate
% N
ew
Hire
s
713
.7%
5.4%
5.3
42.9
%7.
7%0.
0%
713
.7%
0.2%
24.4
57.1
%0.
0%0.
0%
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Stat
us#
in A
genc
y%
of A
genc
yM
edia
n Ag
eM
edia
n Ye
ars
of S
ervi
ce%
Elig
ible
(2
012)
% E
ligib
le
(201
3 -
2017
)#
Elig
. (2
012
- 20
17)
New
Hire
s9
15.8
%27
.20.
350
.0%
3.8%
14
Dec
ease
d0
0.0%
N/A
N/A
60.0
%20
.0%
4
Dism
issal
s0
0.0%
N/A
N/A
50.0
%0.
0%2
Layo
ffs0
0.0%
N/A
N/A
47.1
%5.
9%9
Resig
ned
35.
3%N
/AN
/AN
/AN
/AN
/A
Retir
emen
t0
0.0%
N/A
N/A
50.0
%0.
0%1
Sepa
ratio
n of
Tem
p. W
orke
rs0
0.0%
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
City
wid
e
Dep
artm
ent o
f Rec
ords
and
Info
rmat
ion
Serv
ices
: FY1
2
Med
ian
Age
Wor
kfor
ce P
rofil
e
Th
e D
epar
tmen
t of R
ecor
ds a
nd In
form
atio
n Se
rvice
s pre
serv
es a
nd m
aint
ains
the
City
’s re
cord
s and
pub
licat
ions
thro
ugh
the
Mun
icipa
l Arc
hive
s, th
e M
unici
pal R
ecor
ds M
anag
emen
t Divi
sion,
and
the
City
Hal
l Lib
rary
. The
Dep
artm
ent c
urre
ntly
resp
onds
to m
ore
than
55
,000
requ
ests
ann
ually
and
pro
vides
the
publ
ic an
d Ci
ty a
genc
ies a
cces
s to
appr
oxim
atel
y 18
0,00
0 cu
bic
feet
of h
istor
ically
val
uabl
e Ci
ty re
cord
s and
pho
tos,
and
a un
ique
col
lect
ion
of m
ore
than
340
,000
boo
ks, o
fficia
l gov
ernm
ent r
epor
ts, s
tudi
es a
nd o
ther
pub
licat
ions
.
Empl
oyee
Typ
e
42.0
53.8
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Activ
ity S
tatu
sRe
tirem
ent E
ligib
ility
Skille
d Cr
aft W
orke
rs
Teac
hers
Tech
nici
ans
Cate
gorie
s
Adm
inist
rativ
e Su
ppor
t
Offi
cial
s an
d Ad
min
istra
tors
Para
prof
essio
nals
Prof
essio
nals
N
/A a
ppea
rs w
here
the
popu
latio
n ha
s fe
wer
than
5 e
mpl
oyee
s or
ther
e ar
e no
reco
rds
avai
labl
e, a
nd th
eref
ore,
no
calc
ulat
ions
wer
e m
ade.
Dem
ogra
phic
s Full-
Tim
e Em
ploy
ee T
itle
Publ
ic R
ecor
ds A
ide
Cler
ical
Ass
ocia
te
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Top
10 M
ost P
opul
ous
Full-
Tim
e Ti
tles
Prot
ectiv
e Se
rvic
e W
orke
rs
Serv
ice
Mai
nten
ance
$10
6,47
4
$10
3,65
1
$31
,534
$
31,8
28
$44
,427
$65
,299
DO
RIS
City
wid
e
Ann
ual F
T Sa
lary
54%
57
%
44%
43
%
DO
RIS
City
wid
e
Gen
der
Fem
ale
Mal
e
79%
16%
5%
Activ
eN
ew H
ires
Attri
tion
89%
5% 6%
46%
43%
11
%
Perm
anen
t
Prov
ision
al
62%
7%
31%
100%
0%
Civil
ian
Unifo
rm
82%
18%
76%
24%
Full-
time
FTE
49%
39%
30%
32%
11%
20
%
11%
8%
DO
RIS
City
wid
e
Ethn
icity
W
hite
Blac
kH
ispan
icAs
ian/
Pacif
ic Is
land
erAm
. Ind
ian/
Ala
skan
Nat
ive
93%
7%
26%
20%
13%
2%
7%
19%
11%
2%
0%
0 to
4
5 to
9
10 to
14
15 to
19
20 to
24
25 to
29
30 to
34
35 to
40
40
+
22%
23%
19%
12%
12%
7%
3%
1%
0%
Year
s of S
ervic
e
2%
8%
6%
8%
10%
10%
12%
18%
20%
6%
<
20
20 to
24
30 to
34
35 to
39
40 to
44
45 to
49
50 to
54
55 to
59
60 to
64
6
5+
1%
2%
13%
13%
15%
15%
15%
13%
8%
4%
Age
Agen
cy O
verv
iew
:
5th
to 9
5th
Perc
entil
e M
edia
n
Not
es:
79
IIndi
cato
rD
SNY
City
wid
e
Hea
dcou
nt (F
T / F
TE)
8,84
5 / 1
5330
4,06
6 / 2
3,72
7
Med
ian
Age
/ Yea
rs o
f Ser
vice
43.9
/ 11
.945
.2 /
11.1
% M
ale
/ Fem
ale
91%
/ 9%
43%
/ 57
%
% W
hite
/ M
inor
ity55
% /
45%
39%
/ 61
%
Med
ian
Annu
al F
T Ba
se S
alar
y$6
9,33
9$6
5,29
9
% A
ttriti
on6%
6%
% E
ligib
le to
Ret
ire24
%19
%
% N
ew H
ires
5%5%
% U
nion
Rep
rese
nted
98%
93%
DSN
YCi
tyw
ide
DDSN
Y
DSN
YCi
tyw
ide
## in
Age
ncy
% o
f Age
ncy
% o
f City
wid
eM
edia
n Ye
ars
of S
ervi
ce%
Ret
irem
ent
Elig
ible
% A
ttriti
on R
ate
% N
ew
Hire
s
5,85
065
.0%
100.
0%10
.215
.8%
3.7%
5.1%
855
9.5%
100.
0%14
.934
.2%
7.2%
0.0%
339
3.8%
46.0
%13
.046
.3%
7.2%
5.1%
235
2.6%
5.5%
15.0
37.0
%5.
6%0.
4%
230
2.6%
100.
0%19
.148
.7%
12.2
%0.
0%
152
1.7%
100.
0%4.
59.
2%10
.1%
7.1%
971.
1%72
.4%
6.6
19.6
%6.
7%1.
9%
640.
7%34
.0%
27.6
76.6
%9.
9%0.
0%
520.
6%2.
2%23
.663
.5%
5.4%
1.8%
510.
6%1.
2%21
.743
.1%
3.8%
0.0%
Stat
us#
in A
genc
y%
of A
genc
yM
edia
n Ag
eM
edia
n Ye
ars
of S
ervi
ce%
Elig
ible
(2
012)
% E
ligib
le
(201
3 -
2017
)#
Elig
. (2
012
- 20
17)
New
Hire
s47
95.
0%34
.00.
737
.8%
23.2
%22
1
Dec
ease
d18
0.2%
56.1
18.1
54.2
%15
.0%
245
Dism
issal
s33
0.3%
38.7
3.9
27.3
%7.
3%38
Layo
ffs7
0.1%
55.6
5.7
37.6
%15
.7%
244
Resig
ned
149
1.6%
41.1
0.8
100.
0%0.
0%3
Retir
emen
t36
83.
9%58
.125
.318
.2%
11.6
%2,
050
Sepa
ratio
n of
Tem
p. W
orke
rs9
0.1%
42.7
N/A
44.0
%17
.9%
461
N/A
N/A
N/A
17.4
%26
.1%
10
City
wid
e
Dep
artm
ent o
f San
itatio
n: F
Y12
Med
ian
Age
Wor
kfor
ce P
rofil
e
Th
e D
epar
tmen
t of S
anita
tion
(DSN
Y) p
rom
otes
a h
ealth
y en
viron
men
t thr
ough
the
effic
ient
man
agem
ent o
f sol
id w
aste
and
the
deve
lopm
ent o
f env
ironm
enta
lly so
und
long
-ran
ge p
lann
ing
for h
andl
ing
refu
se, i
nclu
ding
recy
clabl
es. T
he D
epar
tmen
t ope
rate
s dist
rict
gara
ges a
nd m
anag
es a
flee
t of r
ear-
load
ing
colle
ctio
n tru
cks,
mec
hani
cal b
room
s and
salt/
sand
spre
ader
s. Th
e D
epar
tmen
t cle
ars l
itter
, sno
w a
nd ic
e fro
m C
ity st
reet
s and
rem
oves
deb
ris fr
om v
acan
t lot
s as w
ell a
s aba
ndon
ed v
ehicl
es.
Empl
oyee
Typ
e
41.8
45.8
51.0
50.4
47.0
37.1
46.2
55.5
55.7
49.2
Activ
ity S
tatu
sRe
tirem
ent E
ligib
ility
Skille
d Cr
aft W
orke
rs
Teac
hers
Tech
nici
ans
Cate
gorie
s
Adm
inist
rativ
e Su
ppor
t
Offi
cial
s an
d Ad
min
istra
tors
Para
prof
essio
nals
Prof
essio
nals
N
/A a
ppea
rs w
here
the
popu
latio
n ha
s fe
wer
than
5 e
mpl
oyee
s or
ther
e ar
e no
reco
rds
avai
labl
e, a
nd th
eref
ore,
no
calc
ulat
ions
wer
e m
ade.
Dem
ogra
phic
s Full-
Tim
e Em
ploy
ee T
itle
Sani
tatio
n W
orke
r
Supe
rviso
r (Sa
nita
tion)
Auto
Mec
hani
c
Cler
ical
Ass
ocia
te
Gen
eral
Sup
erin
tend
ent (
Sani
tatio
n)
Sani
tatio
n En
forc
emen
t Age
nt
Auto
Mec
hani
c (D
iese
l)
Supe
rviso
r of M
echa
nics
(Mec
hani
cal E
quip
men
t)
Adm
inist
rativ
e St
aff A
naly
st
Prin
cipa
l Adm
inist
rativ
e As
soci
ate
Top
10 M
ost P
opul
ous
Full-
Tim
e Ti
tles
Prot
ectiv
e Se
rvic
e W
orke
rs
Serv
ice
Mai
nten
ance
$93
,134
$
103,
651
$36
,607
$
31,8
28
$69
,339
$
65,2
99
DSN
YCi
tyw
ide
Ann
ual F
T Sa
lary
9%
57%
91%
43%
DSN
YCi
tyw
ide
Gen
der
Fem
ale
Mal
e
89%
5% 6%
Ac
tive
New
Hire
sAt
tritio
n89
%
5% 6%
93%
4%
4%
Perm
anen
t
Prov
ision
al
62%
7%
31%
22%
78%
Ci
vilia
n
Unifo
rm
82%
18%
98%
2%
Full-
time
FTE
55%
39%
24%
32%
18%
20%
3%
8%
DSN
YCi
tyw
ide
Ethn
icity
W
hite
Blac
kH
ispan
icAs
ian/
Pacif
ic Is
land
erAm
. Ind
ian/
Ala
skan
Nat
ive
93%
7%
15%
28%
25%
9%
12%
7%
3%
0%
0%
0 to
4
5 to
9
10 to
14
15 to
19
20 to
24
25 to
29
30 to
34
35 to
40
40
+
22%
23%
19%
12%
12%
7%
3%
1%
0%
Year
s of S
ervic
e
0%
1%
14%
17%
18%
18%
14%
11%
5%
2%
<
20
20 to
24
30 to
34
35 to
39
40 to
44
45 to
49
50 to
54
55 to
59
60 to
64
6
5+
1%
2%
13%
13%
15%
15%
15%
13%
8%
4%
Age
Agen
cy O
verv
iew
:
5th
to 9
5th
Perc
entil
e M
edia
n
Not
es:
80
IIndi
cato
rSB
SCi
tyw
ide
Hea
dcou
nt (F
T / F
TE)
193
/ 49
304,
066
/ 23,
727
Med
ian
Age
/ Yea
rs o
f Ser
vice
42.7
/ 9.
745
.2 /
11.1
% M
ale
/ Fem
ale
46%
/ 54
%43
% /
57%
% W
hite
/ M
inor
ity30
% /
70%
39%
/ 61
%
Med
ian
Annu
al F
T Ba
se S
alar
y$6
6,50
0$6
5,29
9
% A
ttriti
on13
%6%
% E
ligib
le to
Ret
ire28
%19
%
% N
ew H
ires
14%
5%
% U
nion
Rep
rese
nted
64%
93%
SBS
City
wid
e
SSBS
SBS
City
wid
e
## in
Age
ncy
% o
f Age
ncy
% o
f City
wid
eM
edia
n Ye
ars
of S
ervi
ce%
Ret
irem
ent
Elig
ible
% A
ttriti
on R
ate
% N
ew
Hire
s
2711
.2%
3.9%
4.0
22.2
%0.
0%21
.9%
2510
.3%
75.8
%2.
88.
0%32
.4%
21.6
%
187.
4%64
.3%
10.1
11.1
%4.
8%0.
0%
166.
6%0.
7%14
.643
.8%
11.1
%0.
0%
135.
4%0.
5%3.
90.
0%14
.3%
9.5%
114.
5%1.
0%1.
30.
0%13
.3%
26.7
%
114.
5%0.
2%28
.490
.9%
12.5
%0.
0%
93.
7%0.
2%25
.266
.7%
0.0%
0.0%
83.
3%10
0.0%
4.7
12.5
%11
.1%
0.0%
72.
9%10
0.0%
24.4
57.1
%5.
9%0.
0%
Stat
us#
in A
genc
y%
of A
genc
yM
edia
n Ag
eM
edia
n Ye
ars
of S
ervi
ce%
Elig
ible
(2
012)
% E
ligib
le
(201
3 -
2017
)#
Elig
. (2
012
- 20
17)
New
Hire
s38
13.7
%28
.50.
160
.7%
14.3
%21
Dec
ease
d1
0.4%
N/A
N/A
24.3
%11
.4%
25
Dism
issal
s12
4.3%
25.0
0.2
2.2%
6.7%
4
Layo
ffs0
0.0%
N/A
N/A
33.0
%13
.4%
45
Resig
ned
248.
6%31
.02.
5N
/AN
/AN
/A
Retir
emen
t0
0.0%
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Sepa
ratio
n of
Tem
p. W
orke
rs0
0.0%
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.0%
0.0%
0
City
wid
e
Dep
artm
ent o
f Sm
all B
usin
ess
Serv
ices
: FY1
2
Med
ian
Age
Wor
kfor
ce P
rofil
e
Th
e D
epar
tmen
t of S
mal
l Bus
ines
s Ser
vices
(SBS
) mak
es it
eas
ier f
or b
usin
esse
s in
New
Yor
k Ci
ty to
form
, do
busin
ess,
and
grow
by
prov
idin
g di
rect
ass
istan
ce to
bus
ines
s ow
ners
, fos
terin
g ne
ighb
orho
od d
evel
opm
ent i
n co
mm
ercia
l dist
ricts
, and
link
ing
empl
oyer
s to
a sk
illed
and
qual
ified
wor
kfor
ce. S
BS ru
ns th
e Ci
ty’s
NYC
Bus
ines
s Sol
utio
ns C
ente
rs, I
ndus
trial
Bus
ines
s Sol
utio
ns P
rovid
ers,
and
Wor
kfor
ce1
Care
er C
ente
rs, p
rovi
des
serv
ices
to s
uppo
rt th
e gr
owth
of l
ocal
eco
nom
ic de
velo
pmen
t org
aniz
atio
ns, a
nd a
dmin
ister
s th
e M
inor
ity a
nd W
omen
-ow
ned
Busin
ess E
nter
prise
Pro
gram
.
Empl
oyee
Typ
e
36.3
34.2
38.3
51.6
37.2
29.2
58.4
51.1
47.5
55.6
Activ
ity S
tatu
sRe
tirem
ent E
ligib
ility
Skille
d Cr
aft W
orke
rs
Teac
hers
Tech
nici
ans
Cate
gorie
s
Adm
inist
rativ
e Su
ppor
t
Offi
cial
s an
d Ad
min
istra
tors
Para
prof
essio
nals
Prof
essio
nals
N
/A a
ppea
rs w
here
the
popu
latio
n ha
s fe
wer
than
5 e
mpl
oyee
s or
ther
e ar
e no
reco
rds
avai
labl
e, a
nd th
eref
ore,
no
calc
ulat
ions
wer
e m
ade.
Dem
ogra
phic
s Full-
Tim
e Em
ploy
ee T
itle
Adm
inist
rativ
e M
anag
er
Adm
inist
rativ
e Bu
sines
s Pr
omot
ion
Coor
dina
tor
Busin
ess
Prom
otio
n Co
ordi
nato
r
Adm
inist
rativ
e St
aff A
naly
st
Com
mun
ity A
ssoc
iate
Com
mun
ity C
oord
inat
or
Prin
cipa
l Adm
inist
rativ
e As
soci
ate
Cler
ical
Ass
ocia
te
Assis
tant
Com
miss
ione
r
Cont
ract
Rev
iew
er
Top
10 M
ost P
opul
ous
Full-
Tim
e Ti
tles
Prot
ectiv
e Se
rvic
e W
orke
rs
Serv
ice
Mai
nten
ance
$13
9,04
9
$10
3,65
1
$44
,806
$
31,8
28
$66
,500
$
65,2
99
SBS
City
wid
e
Ann
ual F
T Sa
lary
54%
57
%
46%
43
%
SBS
City
wid
e
Gen
der
Fem
ale
Mal
e
73%
14%
13
%
Activ
eN
ew H
ires
Attri
tion
89%
5% 6%
32%
38
%
29%
Perm
anen
t
Prov
ision
al
62%
7%
31%
100%
0%
Civil
ian
Unifo
rm
82%
18%
80%
20%
Full-
time
FTE
30%
39
%
40%
32%
18%
20
%
12%
8%
SBS
City
wid
e
Ethn
icity
W
hite
Blac
kH
ispan
icAs
ian/
Pacif
ic Is
land
erAm
. Ind
ian/
Ala
skan
Nat
ive
93%
7%
41%
10%
14%
7%
11%
9%
5%
2%
2%
0 to
4
5 to
9
10 to
14
15 to
19
20 to
24
25 to
29
30 to
34
35 to
40
40
+
22%
23%
19%
12%
12%
7%
3%
1%
0%
Year
s of S
ervic
e
1%
5%
16%
13%
9%
14%
13%
12%
9%
6%
<
20
20 to
24
30 to
34
35 to
39
40 to
44
45 to
49
50 to
54
55 to
59
60 to
64
6
5+
1%
2%
13%
13%
15%
15%
15%
13%
8%
4%
Age
Agen
cy O
verv
iew
:
5th
to 9
5th
Perc
entil
e M
edia
n
Not
es:
81
IIndi
cato
rD
OT
City
wid
e
Hea
dcou
nt (F
T / F
TE)
4,40
5 / 4
0230
4,06
6 / 2
3,72
7
Med
ian
Age
/ Yea
rs o
f Ser
vice
49.3
/ 12
.945
.2 /
11.1
% M
ale
/ Fem
ale
77%
/ 23
%43
% /
57%
% W
hite
/ M
inor
ity46
% /
54%
39%
/ 61
%
Med
ian
Annu
al F
T Ba
se S
alar
y$5
4,32
3$6
5,29
9
% A
ttriti
on6%
6%
% E
ligib
le to
Ret
ire34
%19
%
% N
ew H
ires
3%5%
% U
nion
Rep
rese
nted
95%
93%
DO
TCi
tyw
ide
DDO
T
DO
TCi
tyw
ide
## in
Age
ncy
% o
f Age
ncy
% o
f City
wid
eM
edia
n Ye
ars
of S
ervi
ce%
Ret
irem
ent
Elig
ible
% A
ttriti
on R
ate
% N
ew
Hire
s
428
8.9%
100.
0%17
.934
.3%
6.1%
0.0%
260
5.4%
100.
0%11
.231
.9%
5.1%
13.1
%
200
4.2%
100.
0%7.
024
.5%
11.5
%9.
3%
182
3.8%
4.3%
8.2
28.6
%5.
1%0.
4%
168
3.5%
100.
0%6.
28.
9%3.
8%0.
0%
141
2.9%
100.
0%7.
922
.0%
5.3%
0.0%
126
2.6%
100.
0%23
.240
.5%
3.1%
0.0%
125
2.6%
95.4
%19
.436
.8%
6.0%
3.8%
117
2.4%
2.6%
20.1
47.0
%7.
4%0.
7%
109
2.3%
37.2
%9.
945
.0%
3.5%
1.8%
Stat
us#
in A
genc
y%
of A
genc
yM
edia
n Ag
eM
edia
n Ye
ars
of S
ervi
ce%
Elig
ible
(2
012)
% E
ligib
le
(201
3 -
2017
)#
Elig
. (2
012
- 20
17)
New
Hire
s16
53.
3%34
.90.
335
.5%
17.1
%22
8
Dec
ease
d12
0.2%
55.7
11.9
46.9
%30
.3%
227
Dism
issal
s62
1.3%
40.0
4.5
19.6
%16
.5%
35
Layo
ffs0
0.0%
N/A
N/A
39.8
%22
.1%
808
Resig
ned
691.
4%36
.63.
5N
/AN
/AN
/A
Retir
emen
t13
52.
7%62
.424
.910
.1%
15.8
%12
8
Sepa
ratio
n of
Tem
p. W
orke
rs1
0.0%
N/A
N/A
34.1
%24
.8%
1,16
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
18.3
%23
.9%
30
City
wid
e
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtat
ion:
FY1
2
Med
ian
Age
Wor
kfor
ce P
rofil
e
Th
e D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
porta
tion
(DO
T) is
resp
onsib
le fo
r the
con
ditio
n an
d op
erat
ion
of s
treet
s, hi
ghw
ays a
nd p
ublic
pla
zas,
brid
ge st
ruct
ures
, and
the
Stat
en Is
land
Fer
ry p
rogr
am. D
OT
ensu
res s
afet
y th
roug
h a
varie
ty o
f app
roac
hes i
nclu
ding
: con
tinuo
us a
nalys
is of
tra
ffic
oper
atio
ns in
inte
rsec
tions
and
cor
ridor
s; da
ily o
pera
tion
of tr
affic
sign
als a
t sig
naliz
ed in
ters
ectio
ns a
nd s
treet
ligh
ts; a
nd e
nhan
cing
cond
ition
s for
ped
estri
ans n
ear s
choo
ls an
d in
com
mun
ities
with
hig
h co
ncen
tratio
ns o
f sen
iors
.
Empl
oyee
Typ
e
49.5
48.9
47.5
47.3
40.4
42.0
48.7
49.2
49.6
55.5
Activ
ity S
tatu
sRe
tirem
ent E
ligib
ility
Skille
d Cr
aft W
orke
rs
Teac
hers
Tech
nici
ans
Cate
gorie
s
Adm
inist
rativ
e Su
ppor
t
Offi
cial
s an
d Ad
min
istra
tors
Para
prof
essio
nals
Prof
essio
nals
N
/A a
ppea
rs w
here
the
popu
latio
n ha
s fe
wer
than
5 e
mpl
oyee
s or
ther
e ar
e no
reco
rds
avai
labl
e, a
nd th
eref
ore,
no
calc
ulat
ions
wer
e m
ade.
Dem
ogra
phic
s Full-
Tim
e Em
ploy
ee T
itle
Hig
hway
Rep
aire
r
Traf
fic D
evic
e M
aint
aine
r
Dec
khan
d
Cler
ical
Ass
ocia
te
Assis
tant
City
Hig
hway
Rep
aire
r
City
Par
king
Equ
ipm
ent S
ervi
ce W
orke
r
Supe
rviso
r Hig
hway
Rep
aire
r
Hig
hway
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Sp
ecia
list
Prin
cipa
l Adm
inist
rativ
e As
soci
ate
Assis
tant
Civ
il En
gine
er
Top
10 M
ost P
opul
ous
Full-
Tim
e Ti
tles
Prot
ectiv
e Se
rvic
e W
orke
rs
Serv
ice
Mai
nten
ance
$10
4,94
7
$10
3,65
1
$35
,086
$
31,8
28
$54
,323
$
65,2
99
DO
TCi
tyw
ide
Ann
ual F
T Sa
lary
23%
57%
77%
43%
DO
TCi
tyw
ide
Gen
der
Fem
ale
Mal
e
91%
3% 6%
Ac
tive
New
Hire
sAt
tritio
n89
%
5% 6%
65%
17%
18
%
Perm
anen
t
Prov
ision
al
62%
7%
31%
100%
0%
Civil
ian
Unifo
rm
82%
18%
92%
8%
Full-
time
FTE
46%
39
%
31%
32%
14%
20
%
9%
8%
DO
TCi
tyw
ide
Ethn
icity
W
hite
Blac
kH
ispan
icAs
ian/
Pacif
ic Is
land
erAm
. Ind
ian/
Ala
skan
Nat
ive
93%
7%
19%
24%
14%
9%
18%
12%
3%
1%
0%
0 to
4
5 to
9
10 to
14
15 to
19
20 to
24
25 to
29
30 to
34
35 to
40
40
+
22%
23%
19%
12%
12%
7%
3%
1%
0%
Year
s of S
ervic
e
0%
1%
9%
9%
12%
19%
20%
16%
9%
5%
<
20
20 to
24
30 to
34
35 to
39
40 to
44
45 to
49
50 to
54
55 to
59
60 to
64
6
5+
1%
2%
13%
13%
15%
15%
15%
13%
8%
4%
Age
Agen
cy O
verv
iew
:
5th
to 9
5th
Perc
entil
e M
edia
n
Not
es:
82
IIndi
cato
rD
YCD
City
wid
e
Hea
dcou
nt (F
T / F
TE)
360
/ 28
304,
066
/ 23,
727
Med
ian
Age
/ Yea
rs o
f Ser
vice
46.8
/ 11
.345
.2 /
11.1
% M
ale
/ Fem
ale
39%
/ 60
%43
% /
57%
% W
hite
/ M
inor
ity22
% /
78%
39%
/ 61
%
Med
ian
Annu
al F
T Ba
se S
alar
y$6
1,19
3$6
5,29
9
% A
ttriti
on11
%6%
% E
ligib
le to
Ret
ire29
%19
%
% N
ew H
ires
4%5%
% U
nion
Rep
rese
nted
71%
93%
DYC
DCi
tyw
ide
DDYC
D
DYC
DCi
tyw
ide
## in
Age
ncy
% o
f Age
ncy
% o
f City
wid
eM
edia
n Ye
ars
of S
ervi
ce%
Ret
irem
ent
Elig
ible
% A
ttriti
on R
ate
% N
ew
Hire
s
5313
.7%
80.3
%11
.128
.3%
8.6%
3.4%
4912
.6%
80.3
%12
.830
.6%
9.3%
1.9%
4010
.3%
51.3
%11
.520
.0%
2.4%
7.1%
379.
5%1.
6%10
.237
.8%
11.4
%4.
5%
246.
2%3.
5%17
.129
.2%
0.0%
0.0%
184.
6%0.
4%21
.033
.3%
18.2
%0.
0%
164.
1%1.
5%10
.831
.3%
0.0%
0.0%
133.
4%1.
2%11
.723
.1%
7.1%
0.0%
123.
1%1.
0%22
.650
.0%
7.7%
0.0%
112.
8%0.
5%11
.227
.3%
8.3%
8.3%
Stat
us#
in A
genc
y%
of A
genc
yM
edia
n Ag
eM
edia
n Ye
ars
of S
ervi
ce%
Elig
ible
(2
012)
% E
ligib
le
(201
3 -
2017
)#
Elig
. (2
012
- 20
17)
New
Hire
s18
4.5%
31.3
0.3
42.4
%18
.2%
20
Dec
ease
d0
0.0%
N/A
N/A
29.0
%15
.1%
41
Dism
issal
s6
1.5%
40.5
7.9
24.1
%6.
9%9
Layo
ffs3
0.7%
N/A
N/A
28.3
%13
.6%
83
Resig
ned
307.
5%32
.13.
4N
/AN
/AN
/A
Retir
emen
t7
1.7%
64.3
36.7
33.3
%33
.3%
2
Sepa
ratio
n of
Tem
p. W
orke
rs0
0.0%
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
City
wid
e
Dep
artm
ent o
f You
th a
nd C
omm
unity
Dev
elop
men
t : F
Y12
Med
ian
Age
Wor
kfor
ce P
rofil
e
Th
e D
epar
tmen
t of Y
outh
and
Com
mun
ity D
evel
opm
ent (
DYC
D) s
uppo
rts y
outh
and
adu
lts th
roug
h 2,
631
cont
ract
s with
com
mun
ity-b
ased
org
aniz
atio
ns th
roug
hout
New
Yor
k Ci
ty. T
hese
con
tract
s and
pro
gram
s inc
lude
the
Out
-of-
Scho
ol T
ime
(OST
) ini
tiativ
e, a
dult
and
yout
h lit
erac
y pr
ogra
ms,
Beac
on c
omm
unity
cen
ters
, you
th w
orkf
orce
dev
elop
men
t pro
gram
s, an
d th
e ru
naw
ay a
nd h
omel
ess y
outh
pro
gram
s.
Empl
oyee
Typ
e
43.6
49.9
43.1
52.1
42.0
47.6
52.9
48.3
53.2
45.9
Activ
ity S
tatu
sRe
tirem
ent E
ligib
ility
Skille
d Cr
aft W
orke
rs
Teac
hers
Tech
nici
ans
Cate
gorie
s
Adm
inist
rativ
e Su
ppor
t
Offi
cial
s an
d Ad
min
istra
tors
Para
prof
essio
nals
Prof
essio
nals
N
/A a
ppea
rs w
here
the
popu
latio
n ha
s fe
wer
than
5 e
mpl
oyee
s or
ther
e ar
e no
reco
rds
avai
labl
e, a
nd th
eref
ore,
no
calc
ulat
ions
wer
e m
ade.
Dem
ogra
phic
s Full-
Tim
e Em
ploy
ee T
itle
Asso
ciat
e Co
ntra
ct S
peci
alist
Cont
ract
Spe
cial
ist
Adm
inist
rativ
e Co
ntra
ct S
peci
alist
Adm
inist
rativ
e St
aff A
naly
st
Adm
inist
rativ
e M
anag
er
Prin
cipa
l Adm
inist
rativ
e As
soci
ate
Com
pute
r Spe
cial
ist (S
oftw
are)
Com
mun
ity C
oord
inat
or
Asso
ciat
e St
aff A
naly
st
Com
mun
ity A
ssoc
iate
Top
10 M
ost P
opul
ous
Full-
Tim
e Ti
tles
Prot
ectiv
e Se
rvic
e W
orke
rs
Serv
ice
Mai
nten
ance
$10
8,16
0
$10
3,65
1
$40
,263
$
31,8
28
$61
,193
$
65,2
99
DYC
DCi
tyw
ide
Ann
ual F
T Sa
lary
60%
57
%
39%
43
%
DYC
DCi
tyw
ide
Gen
der
Fem
ale
Mal
e
84%
5% 11
%
Activ
eN
ew H
ires
Attri
tion
89%
5% 6%
37%
47%
16
%
Perm
anen
t
Prov
ision
al
62%
7%
31%
100%
0%
Civil
ian
Unifo
rm
82%
18%
93%
7%
Full-
time
FTE
22%
39%
49%
32%
21%
20
%
8%
8%
DYC
DCi
tyw
ide
Ethn
icity
W
hite
Blac
kH
ispan
icAs
ian/
Pacif
ic Is
land
erAm
. Ind
ian/
Ala
skan
Nat
ive
93%
7%
25%
19%
23%
13%
7%
6%
4%
1%
1%
0 to
4
5 to
9
10 to
14
15 to
19
20 to
24
25 to
29
30 to
34
35 to
40
40
+
22%
23%
19%
12%
12%
7%
3%
1%
0%
Year
s of S
ervic
e
0%
3%
14%
10%
15%
15%
15%
14%
7%
8%
<
20
20 to
24
30 to
34
35 to
39
40 to
44
45 to
49
50 to
54
55 to
59
60 to
64
6
5+
1%
2%
13%
13%
15%
15%
15%
13%
8%
4%
Age
Agen
cy O
verv
iew
:
5th
to 9
5th
Perc
entil
e M
edia
n
Not
es:
83
IIndi
cato
rFD
NY
City
wid
e
Hea
dcou
nt (F
T / F
TE)
15,3
15 /
8930
4,06
6 / 2
3,72
7
Med
ian
Age
/ Yea
rs o
f Ser
vice
40.2
/ 11
.245
.2 /
11.1
% M
ale
/ Fem
ale
91%
/ 9%
43%
/ 57
%
% W
hite
/ M
inor
ity76
% /
24%
39%
/ 61
%
Med
ian
Annu
al F
T Ba
se S
alar
y$7
6,48
8$6
5,29
9
% A
ttriti
on4%
6%
% E
ligib
le to
Ret
ire21
%19
%
% N
ew H
ires
2%5%
% U
nion
Rep
rese
nted
99%
93%
FDN
YCi
tyw
ide
FFDN
Y
FDN
YCi
tyw
ide
## in
Age
ncy
% o
f Age
ncy
% o
f City
wid
eM
edia
n Ye
ars
of S
ervi
ce%
Ret
irem
ent
Elig
ible
% A
ttriti
on R
ate
% N
ew
Hire
s
7,65
049
.7%
100.
0%9.
912
.1%
3.3%
0.0%
2,12
713
.8%
100.
0%5.
36.
2%5.
1%7.
3%
1,40
89.
1%10
0.0%
18.0
37.5
%4.
8%0.
0%
825
5.4%
100.
0%8.
05.
9%3.
5%4.
7%
547
3.6%
100.
0%21
.758
.1%
4.4%
0.0%
492
3.2%
100.
0%21
.226
.8%
4.3%
0.0%
339
2.2%
100.
0%27
.790
.3%
4.0%
0.0%
160
1.0%
100.
0%15
.944
.4%
4.2%
0.0%
154
1.0%
100.
0%8.
414
.3%
6.7%
5.5%
153
1.0%
100.
0%3.
119
.0%
3.8%
10.1
%
Stat
us#
in A
genc
y%
of A
genc
yM
edia
n Ag
eM
edia
n Ye
ars
of S
ervi
ce%
Elig
ible
(2
012)
% E
ligib
le
(201
3 -
2017
)#
Elig
. (2
012
- 20
17)
New
Hire
s25
71.
6%27
.80.
432
.6%
16.3
%22
5
Dec
ease
d17
0.1%
52.7
17.5
52.1
%26
.3%
1,99
7
Dism
issal
s60
0.4%
38.2
4.3
27.3
%36
.4%
21
Layo
ffs0
0.0%
N/A
N/A
37.2
%21
.0%
205
Resig
ned
940.
6%30
.64.
313
.3%
12.6
%2,
093
Retir
emen
t46
12.
9%50
.922
.541
.9%
18.6
%26
Sepa
ratio
n of
Tem
p. W
orke
rs0
0.0%
N/A
N/A
43.1
%28
.3%
207
N/A
N/A
N/A
9.2%
14.4
%81
8
City
wid
e
Fire
Dep
artm
ent :
FY1
2
Med
ian
Age
Wor
kfor
ce P
rofil
e
Th
e Fi
re D
epar
tmen
t (FD
NY)
resp
onds
to fi
res,
publ
ic sa
fety
and
med
ical e
mer
genc
ies,
natu
ral d
isast
ers a
nd te
rroris
t act
s to
prot
ect t
he li
ves a
nd p
rope
rty o
f City
resid
ents
and
visi
tors
. The
Dep
artm
ent a
dvan
ces f
ire sa
fety
thro
ugh
its fi
re p
reve
ntio
n, in
vest
igat
ion
and
educ
atio
n pr
ogra
ms,
and
cont
ribut
es to
the
City
's ho
mel
and
secu
rity
effo
rts.
Empl
oyee
Typ
e
37.6
31.9
45.5
35.6
47.8
46.8
52.2
53.5
39.6
46.6
Activ
ity S
tatu
sRe
tirem
ent E
ligib
ility
Skille
d Cr
aft W
orke
rs
Teac
hers
Tech
nici
ans
Cate
gorie
s
Adm
inist
rativ
e Su
ppor
t
Offi
cial
s an
d Ad
min
istra
tors
Para
prof
essio
nals
Prof
essio
nals
N
/A a
ppea
rs w
here
the
popu
latio
n ha
s fe
wer
than
5 e
mpl
oyee
s or
ther
e ar
e no
reco
rds
avai
labl
e, a
nd th
eref
ore,
no
calc
ulat
ions
wer
e m
ade.
Dem
ogra
phic
s Full-
Tim
e Em
ploy
ee T
itle
Fire
fight
er
Emer
genc
y M
edic
al S
peci
alist
- E
MT
Lieu
tena
nt (F
ire)
Emer
genc
y M
edic
al S
peci
alist
- P
aram
edic
Capt
ain
(Fire
)
Supe
rvisi
ng E
mer
genc
y M
edic
al S
ervi
ce S
peci
alist
Batta
lion
Chie
f
Asso
ciat
e Fi
re P
rote
ctio
n In
spec
tor
Fire
Ala
rm D
ispat
cher
Fire
Pro
tect
ion
Insp
ecto
r
Top
10 M
ost P
opul
ous
Full-
Tim
e Ti
tles
Prot
ectiv
e Se
rvic
e W
orke
rs
Serv
ice
Mai
nten
ance
$11
2,57
4
$10
3,65
1
$38
,801
$
31,8
28
$76
,488
$
65,2
99
FDN
YCi
tyw
ide
Ann
ual F
T Sa
lary
9%
57%
91%
43%
FDN
YCi
tyw
ide
Gen
der
Fem
ale
Mal
e
94%
2%
4%
Activ
eN
ew H
ires
Attri
tion
89%
5% 6%
95%
4%
1%
Perm
anen
t
Prov
ision
al
62%
7%
31%
33%
67%
Ci
vilia
n
Unifo
rm
82%
18%
99%
1%
Full-
time
FTE
76%
39%
10%
32%
12%
20%
2%
8%
FDN
YCi
tyw
ide
Ethn
icity
W
hite
Blac
kH
ispan
icAs
ian/
Pacif
ic Is
land
erAm
. Ind
ian/
Ala
skan
Nat
ive
93%
7%
16%
29%
19%
14%
12%
7%
4%
0%
0%
0 to
4
5 to
9
10 to
14
15 to
19
20 to
24
25 to
29
30 to
34
35 to
40
40
+
22%
23%
19%
12%
12%
7%
3%
1%
0%
Year
s of S
ervic
e
0%
3%
21%
20%
18%
17%
12%
7%
2%
1%
<
20
20 to
24
30 to
34
35 to
39
40 to
44
45 to
49
50 to
54
55 to
59
60 to
64
6
5+
1%
2%
13%
13%
15%
15%
15%
13%
8%
4%
Age
Agen
cy O
verv
iew
:
5th
to 9
5th
Perc
entil
e M
edia
n
Not
es:
84
IIndi
cato
rH
HC
City
wid
e
Hea
dcou
nt (F
T / F
TE)
36,3
35 /
2,05
230
4,06
6 / 2
3,72
7
Med
ian
Age
/ Yea
rs o
f Ser
vice
49.2
/ 9.
745
.2 /
11.1
% M
ale
/ Fem
ale
31%
/ 69
%43
% /
57%
% W
hite
/ M
inor
ity17
% /
83%
39%
/ 61
%
Med
ian
Annu
al F
T Ba
se S
alar
y$4
9,75
4$6
5,29
9
% A
ttriti
on8%
6%
% E
ligib
le to
Ret
ire19
%19
%
% N
ew H
ires
6%5%
% U
nion
Rep
rese
nted
100%
93%
HH
CCi
tyw
ide
HHH
C
HH
CCi
tyw
ide
## in
Age
ncy
% o
f Age
ncy
% o
f City
wid
eM
edia
n Ye
ars
of S
ervi
ce%
Ret
irem
ent
Elig
ible
% A
ttriti
on R
ate
% N
ew
Hire
s
6,51
117
.0%
92.1
%8.
213
.6%
4.9%
5.2%
3,57
49.
3%10
0.0%
11.4
21.6
%5.
6%3.
0%
1,62
34.
2%10
0.0%
9.4
11.6
%4.
1%3.
5%
1,07
12.
8%10
0.0%
9.9
12.6
%4.
7%0.
9%
1,00
62.
6%10
0.0%
10.0
17.1
%5.
8%2.
0%
975
2.5%
100.
0%7.
811
.0%
5.0%
0.7%
857
2.2%
100.
0%11
.724
.0%
5.1%
0.8%
706
1.8%
100.
0%21
.641
.5%
6.9%
1.6%
655
1.7%
100.
0%12
.626
.7%
4.2%
2.0%
644
1.7%
100.
0%13
.622
.7%
2.4%
2.5%
Stat
us#
in A
genc
y%
of A
genc
yM
edia
n Ag
eM
edia
n Ye
ars
of S
ervi
ce%
Elig
ible
(2
012)
% E
ligib
le
(201
3 -
2017
)#
Elig
. (2
012
- 20
17)
New
Hire
s2,
655
6.2%
32.8
0.7
22.0
%15
.6%
2,57
7
Dec
ease
d63
0.1%
58.2
15.0
23.3
%19
.6%
1,61
4
Dism
issal
s36
70.
9%48
.86.
717
.6%
19.7
%1,
551
Layo
ffs96
42.
2%33
.44.
017
.2%
17.3
%5,
135
Resig
ned
1,20
42.
8%38
.74.
412
.7%
16.1
%23
8
Retir
emen
t85
02.
0%64
.225
.820
.7%
18.9
%1,
290
Sepa
ratio
n of
Tem
p. W
orke
rs0
0.0%
N/A
N/A
25.5
%24
.4%
397
N/A
N/A
N/A
16.7
%19
.4%
1,75
1
City
wid
e
Hea
lth a
nd H
ospi
tals
Corp
orat
ion:
FY1
2
Med
ian
Age
Wor
kfor
ce P
rofil
e
Th
e H
ealth
and
Hos
pita
ls Co
rpor
atio
n (H
HC)
, the
larg
est m
unici
pal h
ospi
tal a
nd h
ealth
car
e sy
stem
in th
e co
untry
, is a
$7
billio
n pu
blic
bene
fit c
orpo
ratio
n. It
pro
vides
med
ical,
men
tal h
ealth
and
subs
tanc
e ab
use
serv
ices t
hrou
gh it
s 11
acut
e ca
re h
ospi
tals,
four
skille
d nu
rsin
g fa
ciliti
es, s
ix la
rge
diag
nost
ic an
d tre
atm
ent c
ente
rs a
nd m
ore
than
70
com
mun
ity a
nd sc
hool
-bas
ed c
linics
. HH
C al
so p
rovid
es sp
ecia
lized
serv
ices s
uch
as tr
aum
a, h
igh
risk
neon
atal
and
obs
tetri
c ca
re a
nd b
urn
care
. One
in e
very
six
New
Yor
kers
rece
ives h
ealth
serv
ices a
t an
HH
C fa
cility
.
Empl
oyee
Typ
e
48.3
48.8
47.4
48.9
49.8
50.4
54.3
54.6
51.1
48.6
Activ
ity S
tatu
sRe
tirem
ent E
ligib
ility
Skille
d Cr
aft W
orke
rs
Teac
hers
Tech
nici
ans
Cate
gorie
s
Adm
inist
rativ
e Su
ppor
t
Offi
cial
s an
d Ad
min
istra
tors
Para
prof
essio
nals
Prof
essio
nals
N
/A a
ppea
rs w
here
the
popu
latio
n ha
s fe
wer
than
5 e
mpl
oyee
s or
ther
e ar
e no
reco
rds
avai
labl
e, a
nd th
eref
ore,
no
calc
ulat
ions
wer
e m
ade.
Dem
ogra
phic
s Full-
Tim
e Em
ploy
ee T
itle
Staf
f Nur
se
Cler
ical
Ass
ocia
te (H
HC)
Patie
nt C
are
Asso
ciat
e
Serv
ice
Aide
Lice
nsed
Pra
ctic
al N
urse
Patie
nt C
are
Tech
nici
an
Nur
se's
Aide
Hea
d N
urse
Coor
dina
ting
Man
ager
A
Assis
tant
Coo
rdin
atin
g M
anag
er
Top
10 M
ost P
opul
ous
Full-
Tim
e Ti
tles
Prot
ectiv
e Se
rvic
e W
orke
rs
Serv
ice
Mai
nten
ance
$10
4,35
1
$10
3,65
1
$33
,954
$
31,8
28
$49
,754
$65
,299
HH
CCi
tyw
ide
Ann
ual F
T Sa
lary
69%
57
%
31%
43
%
HH
CCi
tyw
ide
Gen
der
Fem
ale
Mal
e
86%
6% 8%
Activ
eN
ew H
ires
Attri
tion
89%
5% 6%
65%
11%
24
%
Perm
anen
t
Prov
ision
al
62%
7%
31%
100%
0%
Civil
ian
Unifo
rm
82%
18%
95%
5%
Full-
time
FTE
17%
39%
45%
32%
19%
20%
19%
8%
HH
CCi
tyw
ide
Ethn
icity
W
hite
Blac
kH
ispan
icAs
ian/
Pacif
ic Is
land
erAm
. Ind
ian/
Ala
skan
Nat
ive
93%
7%
29%
21%
15%
10%
12%
6%
4%
1%
1%
0 to
4
5 to
9
10 to
14
15 to
19
20 to
24
25 to
29
30 to
34
35 to
40
40
+
22%
23%
19%
12%
12%
7%
3%
1%
0%
Year
s of S
ervic
e
0%
1%
11%
10%
12%
15%
18%
17%
11%
5%
<
20
20 to
24
30 to
34
35 to
39
40 to
44
45 to
49
50 to
54
55 to
59
60 to
64
6
5+
1%
2%
13%
13%
15%
15%
15%
13%
8%
4%
Age
Agen
cy O
verv
iew
:
5th
to 9
5th
Perc
entil
e M
edia
n
Not
es:
85
IIndi
cato
rH
RACi
tyw
ide
Hea
dcou
nt (F
T / F
TE)
13,9
18 /
3030
4,06
6 / 2
3,72
7
Med
ian
Age
/ Yea
rs o
f Ser
vice
50.5
/ 14
45.2
/ 11
.1
% M
ale
/ Fem
ale
30%
/ 70
%43
% /
57%
% W
hite
/ M
inor
ity15
% /
85%
39%
/ 61
%
Med
ian
Annu
al F
T Ba
se S
alar
y$4
1,10
1$6
5,29
9
% A
ttriti
on5%
6%
% E
ligib
le to
Ret
ire36
%19
%
% N
ew H
ires
5%5%
% U
nion
Rep
rese
nted
95%
93%
HRA
City
wid
e
HHRA
HRA
City
wid
e
## in
Age
ncy
% o
f Age
ncy
% o
f City
wid
eM
edia
n Ye
ars
of S
ervi
ce%
Ret
irem
ent
Elig
ible
% A
ttriti
on R
ate
% N
ew
Hire
s
2,43
317
.4%
99.8
%8.
023
.1%
4.4%
7.7%
1,63
511
.7%
91.2
%14
.539
.6%
4.8%
2.6%
1,44
910
.4%
100.
0%6.
926
.6%
4.7%
11.0
%
1,40
710
.1%
31.8
%21
.547
.1%
5.1%
0.1%
1,21
48.
7%28
.4%
11.8
34.8
%5.
0%2.
9%
845
6.1%
100.
0%21
.846
.6%
3.4%
0.1%
693
5.0%
84.8
%12
.726
.8%
4.9%
11.0
%
482
3.5%
87.5
%20
.043
.8%
4.4%
0.0%
347
2.5%
14.7
%22
.754
.8%
5.7%
4.1%
324
2.3%
31.1
%13
.652
.5%
5.3%
2.3%
Stat
us#
in A
genc
y%
of A
genc
yM
edia
n Ag
eM
edia
n Ye
ars
of S
ervi
ce%
Elig
ible
(2
012)
% E
ligib
le
(201
3 -
2017
)#
Elig
. (2
012
- 20
17)
New
Hire
s65
64.
6%35
.90.
341
.4%
20.5
%1,
836
Dec
ease
d33
0.2%
58.4
19.9
50.4
%21
.6%
490
Dism
issal
s11
80.
8%48
.17.
631
.1%
18.6
%91
Layo
ffs0
0.0%
N/A
N/A
34.7
%22
.4%
4,87
2
Resig
ned
144
1.0%
39.5
3.6
10.3
%5.
6%17
Retir
emen
t41
82.
9%63
.225
.649
.6%
22.6
%99
Sepa
ratio
n of
Tem
p. W
orke
rs0
0.0%
N/A
N/A
51.5
%22
.7%
49
N/A
N/A
N/A
28.6
%15
.9%
450
City
wid
e
Hum
an R
esou
rces
Adm
inist
ratio
n: F
Y12
Med
ian
Age
Wor
kfor
ce P
rofil
e
Th
e H
uman
Res
ourc
es A
dmin
istra
tion
(HRA
) ass
ists i
ndivi
dual
s and
fam
ilies i
n ac
hiev
ing
and
sust
aini
ng th
eir m
axim
um d
egre
e of
self-
suffi
cienc
y. H
RA p
rovid
es c
ash
assis
tanc
e an
d em
ploy
men
t ser
vices
at 2
4 Jo
b Ce
nter
s, th
e Fa
mily
Ser
vices
Cal
l Cen
ter a
nd it
s sat
ellit
es,
and
the
Spec
ial P
roje
ct C
ente
r. H
RA p
rovi
des H
ASA
supp
ort s
ervi
ces t
o m
edica
lly e
ligib
le in
divid
uals
at 1
2 ce
nter
s (ni
ne a
re M
odel
Offi
ces)
and
adu
lt pr
otec
tive
serv
ices t
hrou
gh s
ix H
RA b
orou
gh o
ffice
s and
six
cont
ract
ed p
rogr
ams.
Empl
oyee
Typ
e
47.4
52.6
48.5
51.9
49.5
52.5
46.2
52.1
53.8
54.0
Activ
ity S
tatu
sRe
tirem
ent E
ligib
ility
Skille
d Cr
aft W
orke
rs
Teac
hers
Tech
nici
ans
Cate
gorie
s
Adm
inist
rativ
e Su
ppor
t
Offi
cial
s an
d Ad
min
istra
tors
Para
prof
essio
nals
Prof
essio
nals
N
/A a
ppea
rs w
here
the
popu
latio
n ha
s fe
wer
than
5 e
mpl
oyee
s or
ther
e ar
e no
reco
rds
avai
labl
e, a
nd th
eref
ore,
no
calc
ulat
ions
wer
e m
ade.
Dem
ogra
phic
s Full-
Tim
e Em
ploy
ee T
itle
Elig
ibilit
y Sp
ecia
list
Case
wor
ker
Job
Opp
ortu
nity
Spe
cial
ist
Prin
cipa
l Adm
inist
rativ
e As
soci
ate
Cler
ical
Ass
ocia
te
Asso
ciat
e Jo
b O
ppor
tuni
ty S
peci
alist
Frau
d In
vest
igat
or
Supe
rviso
r I (S
ocia
l Ser
vice
s)
Adm
inist
rativ
e St
aff A
naly
st
Com
pute
r Spe
cial
ist (S
oftw
are)
Top
10 M
ost P
opul
ous
Full-
Tim
e Ti
tles
Prot
ectiv
e Se
rvic
e W
orke
rs
Serv
ice
Mai
nten
ance
$82
,779
$10
3,65
1
$31
,852
$
31,8
28
$41
,101
$65
,299
HRA
City
wid
e
Ann
ual F
T Sa
lary
70%
57
%
30%
43
%
HRA
City
wid
e
Gen
der
Fem
ale
Mal
e
90%
5% 5%
Ac
tive
New
Hire
sAt
tritio
n89
%
5% 6%
86%
9% 5%
Pe
rman
ent
Prov
ision
al
62%
7%
31%
100%
0%
Civil
ian
Unifo
rm
82%
18%
100%
0%
Full-
time
FTE
15%
39%
60%
32%
18%
20
%
7%
8%
HRA
City
wid
e
Ethn
icity
W
hite
Blac
kH
ispan
icAs
ian/
Pacif
ic Is
land
erAm
. Ind
ian/
Ala
skan
Nat
ive
93%
7%
21%
16%
15%
13%
17%
11%
4%
2%
1%
0 to
4
5 to
9
10 to
14
15 to
19
20 to
24
25 to
29
30 to
34
35 to
40
40
+
22%
23%
19%
12%
12%
7%
3%
1%
0%
Year
s of S
ervic
e
0%
1%
7%
8%
12%
18%
20%
17%
12%
5%
<
20
20 to
24
30 to
34
35 to
39
40 to
44
45 to
49
50 to
54
55 to
59
60 to
64
6
5+
1%
2%
13%
13%
15%
15%
15%
13%
8%
4%
Age
Agen
cy O
verv
iew
:
5th
to 9
5th
Perc
entil
e M
edia
n
Not
es:
86
IIndi
cato
rLP
CCi
tyw
ide
Hea
dcou
nt (F
T / F
TE)
51 /
730
4,06
6 / 2
3,72
7
Med
ian
Age
/ Yea
rs o
f Ser
vice
48.4
/ 9.
845
.2 /
11.1
% M
ale
/ Fem
ale
36%
/ 63
%43
% /
57%
% W
hite
/ M
inor
ity72
% /
28%
39%
/ 61
%
Med
ian
Annu
al F
T Ba
se S
alar
y$5
5,90
5$6
5,29
9
% A
ttriti
on5%
6%
% E
ligib
le to
Ret
ire27
%19
%
% N
ew H
ires
5%5%
% U
nion
Rep
rese
nted
78%
93%
LPC
City
wid
e
LLPC
LPC
City
wid
e
## in
Age
ncy
% o
f Age
ncy
% o
f City
wid
eM
edia
n Ye
ars
of S
ervi
ce%
Ret
irem
ent
Elig
ible
% A
ttriti
on R
ate
% N
ew
Hire
s
2339
.7%
88.5
%5.
826
.1%
6.3%
3.1%
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Stat
us#
in A
genc
y%
of A
genc
yM
edia
n Ag
eM
edia
n Ye
ars
of S
ervi
ce%
Elig
ible
(2
012)
% E
ligib
le
(201
3 -
2017
)#
Elig
. (2
012
- 20
17)
New
Hire
s3
4.8%
N/A
N/A
40.0
%20
.0%
3
Dec
ease
d0
0.0%
N/A
N/A
25.0
%33
.3%
7
Dism
issal
s0
0.0%
N/A
N/A
0.0%
0.0%
0
Layo
ffs0
0.0%
N/A
N/A
29.7
%18
.9%
18
Resig
ned
34.
8%N
/AN
/AN
/AN
/AN
/A
Retir
emen
t0
0.0%
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Sepa
ratio
n of
Tem
p. W
orke
rs0
0.0%
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
City
wid
e
Land
mar
ks P
rese
rvat
ion
Com
miss
ion:
FY1
2
Med
ian
Age
Wor
kfor
ce P
rofil
e
Th
e La
ndm
arks
Pre
serv
atio
n Co
mm
issio
n (L
PC) d
esig
nate
s, re
gula
tes a
nd p
rote
cts t
he C
ity’s
arch
itect
ural
, hist
oric
and
cultu
ral r
esou
rces
, whi
ch n
ow n
umbe
r 1,3
16 in
divid
ual l
andm
arks
and
mor
e th
an 3
0,00
0 pr
oper
ties i
n 10
8 hi
stor
ic di
stric
ts a
nd 1
8 ex
tens
ions
to e
xistin
g hi
stor
ic di
stric
ts. T
he A
genc
y re
view
s app
licat
ions
to a
lter l
andm
ark
stru
ctur
es, i
nves
tigat
es c
ompl
aint
s of i
llega
l wor
k an
d in
itiat
es a
ctio
n to
com
pel c
ompl
ianc
e w
ith th
e La
ndm
arks
Law
.
Empl
oyee
Typ
e
41.6
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Activ
ity S
tatu
sRe
tirem
ent E
ligib
ility
Skille
d Cr
aft W
orke
rs
Teac
hers
Tech
nici
ans
Cate
gorie
s
Adm
inist
rativ
e Su
ppor
t
Offi
cial
s an
d Ad
min
istra
tors
Para
prof
essio
nals
Prof
essio
nals
N
/A a
ppea
rs w
here
the
popu
latio
n ha
s fe
wer
than
5 e
mpl
oyee
s or
ther
e ar
e no
reco
rds
avai
labl
e, a
nd th
eref
ore,
no
calc
ulat
ions
wer
e m
ade.
Dem
ogra
phic
s Full-
Tim
e Em
ploy
ee T
itle
Land
mar
ks P
rese
rvat
ioni
st
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Top
10 M
ost P
opul
ous
Full-
Tim
e Ti
tles
Prot
ectiv
e Se
rvic
e W
orke
rs
Serv
ice
Mai
nten
ance
$12
4,38
4
$10
3,65
1
$39
,379
$
31,8
28
$55
,905
$
65,2
99
LPC
City
wid
e
Ann
ual F
T Sa
lary
63%
57
%
36%
43
%
LPC
City
wid
e
Gen
der
Fem
ale
Mal
e
90%
5% 5%
Ac
tive
New
Hire
sAt
tritio
n89
%
5% 6%
59%
22%
19
%
Perm
anen
t
Prov
ision
al
62%
7%
31%
100%
0%
Civil
ian
Unifo
rm
82%
18%
88%
12%
Fu
ll-tim
eFT
E
72%
39%
8%
32%
10%
20
%
10%
8%
LPC
City
wid
e
Ethn
icity
W
hite
Blac
kH
ispan
icAs
ian/
Pacif
ic Is
land
erAm
. Ind
ian/
Ala
skan
Nat
ive
93%
7%
27%
24%
17%
12%
14%
3%
3%
0%
0%
0 to
4
5 to
9
10 to
14
15 to
19
20 to
24
25 to
29
30 to
34
35 to
40
40
+
22%
23%
19%
12%
12%
7%
3%
1%
0%
Year
s of S
ervic
e
0%
0%
20%
11%
11%
7%
15%
20%
11%
5%
<
20
20 to
24
30 to
34
35 to
39
40 to
44
45 to
49
50 to
54
55 to
59
60 to
64
6
5+
1%
2%
13%
13%
15%
15%
15%
13%
8%
4%
Age
Agen
cy O
verv
iew
:
5th
to 9
5th
Perc
entil
e M
edia
n
Not
es:
87
IIndi
cato
rLA
WCi
tyw
ide
Hea
dcou
nt (F
T / F
TE)
1,26
5 / 1
3430
4,06
6 / 2
3,72
7
Med
ian
Age
/ Yea
rs o
f Ser
vice
42.8
/ 8.
745
.2 /
11.1
% M
ale
/ Fem
ale
38%
/ 62
%43
% /
57%
% W
hite
/ M
inor
ity52
% /
48%
39%
/ 61
%
Med
ian
Annu
al F
T Ba
se S
alar
y$6
4,33
8$6
5,29
9
% A
ttriti
on10
%6%
% E
ligib
le to
Ret
ire24
%19
%
% N
ew H
ires
12%
5%
% U
nion
Rep
rese
nted
91%
93%
LAW
City
wid
e
LLAW
LAW
City
wid
e
## in
Age
ncy
% o
f Age
ncy
% o
f City
wid
eM
edia
n Ye
ars
of S
ervi
ce%
Ret
irem
ent
Elig
ible
% A
ttriti
on R
ate
% N
ew
Hire
s
641
45.8
%10
0.0%
6.9
21.1
%6.
6%12
.7%
230
16.4
%84
.9%
8.3
13.0
%6.
0%12
.8%
117
8.4%
2.7%
15.6
38.5
%4.
2%0.
0%
423.
0%84
.0%
9.7
31.0
%1.
8%3.
5%
322.
3%86
.5%
17.1
62.5
%12
.2%
0.0%
292.
1%90
.6%
21.7
69.0
%16
.7%
8.3%
201.
4%0.
5%23
.070
.0%
4.5%
0.0%
130.
9%1.
1%19
.846
.2%
6.7%
0.0%
90.
6%1.
4%16
.933
.3%
0.0%
0.0%
90.
6%7.
0%9.
911
.1%
0.0%
0.0%
Stat
us#
in A
genc
y%
of A
genc
yM
edia
n Ag
eM
edia
n Ye
ars
of S
ervi
ce%
Elig
ible
(2
012)
% E
ligib
le
(201
3 -
2017
)#
Elig
. (2
012
- 20
17)
New
Hire
s19
112
.0%
28.9
0.7
37.6
%12
.9%
137
Dec
ease
d5
0.3%
N/A
N/A
34.8
%13
.0%
11
Dism
issal
s17
1.1%
42.2
4.2
0.0%
0.0%
0
Layo
ffs0
0.0%
N/A
N/A
23.0
%11
.9%
250
Resig
ned
118
7.4%
29.3
3.0
N/A
N/A
N/A
Retir
emen
t16
1.0%
63.9
23.5
18.2
%27
.3%
5
Sepa
ratio
n of
Tem
p. W
orke
rs0
0.0%
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
20.8
%10
.0%
108
City
wid
e
Law
Dep
artm
ent :
FY1
2
Med
ian
Age
Wor
kfor
ce P
rofil
e
Th
e La
w D
epar
tmen
t is t
he a
ttorn
ey fo
r the
City
, City
age
ncie
s and
cer
tain
non
-City
age
ncie
s and
pen
sion
boar
ds, a
nd m
anag
es li
tigat
ion
and
othe
r leg
al m
atte
rs in
volvi
ng th
e Ci
ty a
nd it
s int
eres
ts. T
he L
aw D
epar
tmen
t is r
espo
nsib
le fo
r mor
e th
an 8
0,00
0 m
atte
rs, a
nd
prov
ides
lega
l adv
ice to
all
City
age
ncie
s.
Empl
oyee
Typ
e
39.5
40.6
48.0
47.4
57.7
54.2
58.3
52.4
51.2
42.9
Activ
ity S
tatu
sRe
tirem
ent E
ligib
ility
Skille
d Cr
aft W
orke
rs
Teac
hers
Tech
nici
ans
Cate
gorie
s
Adm
inist
rativ
e Su
ppor
t
Offi
cial
s an
d Ad
min
istra
tors
Para
prof
essio
nals
Prof
essio
nals
N
/A a
ppea
rs w
here
the
popu
latio
n ha
s fe
wer
than
5 e
mpl
oyee
s or
ther
e ar
e no
reco
rds
avai
labl
e, a
nd th
eref
ore,
no
calc
ulat
ions
wer
e m
ade.
Dem
ogra
phic
s Full-
Tim
e Em
ploy
ee T
itle
Assis
tant
Cor
pora
tion
Coun
sel
Para
lega
l Aid
e
Cler
ical
Ass
ocia
te
Wor
kers
' Com
pens
atio
n Be
nefit
s Ex
amin
er
Clai
m S
peci
alist
Lega
l Sec
reta
rial A
ssist
ant
Prin
cipa
l Adm
inist
rativ
e As
soci
ate
Asso
ciat
e St
aff A
naly
st
Staf
f Ana
lyst
Publ
ic R
ecor
ds A
ide
Top
10 M
ost P
opul
ous
Full-
Tim
e Ti
tles
Prot
ectiv
e Se
rvic
e W
orke
rs
Serv
ice
Mai
nten
ance
$13
2,44
4
$10
3,65
1
$35
,285
$
31,8
28
$64
,338
$
65,2
99
LAW
City
wid
e
Ann
ual F
T Sa
lary
62%
57
%
38%
43
%
LAW
City
wid
e
Gen
der
Fem
ale
Mal
e
78%
12%
10%
Activ
eN
ew H
ires
Attri
tion
89%
5% 6%
38%
11
%
51%
Perm
anen
t
Prov
ision
al
62%
7%
31%
100%
0%
Civil
ian
Unifo
rm
82%
18%
90%
10%
Fu
ll-tim
eFT
E
52%
39%
30%
32%
9%
20%
8%
8%
LAW
City
wid
e
Ethn
icity
W
hite
Blac
kH
ispan
icAs
ian/
Pacif
ic Is
land
erAm
. Ind
ian/
Ala
skan
Nat
ive
93%
7%
32%
22%
15%
10%
9%
6%
4%
1%
1%
0 to
4
5 to
9
10 to
14
15 to
19
20 to
24
25 to
29
30 to
34
35 to
40
40
+
22%
23%
19%
12%
12%
7%
3%
1%
0%
Year
s of S
ervic
e
0%
5%
20%
11%
12%
14%
12%
11%
9%
5%
<
20
20 to
24
30 to
34
35 to
39
40 to
44
45 to
49
50 to
54
55 to
59
60 to
64
6
5+
1%
2%
13%
13%
15%
15%
15%
13%
8%
4%
Age
Agen
cy O
verv
iew
:
5th
to 9
5th
Perc
entil
e M
edia
n
Not
es:
88
IIndi
cato
rM
AYO
RALT
YCi
tyw
ide
Hea
dcou
nt (F
T / F
TE)
864
/ 11
304,
066
/ 23,
727
Med
ian
Age
/ Yea
rs o
f Ser
vice
40.6
/ 7.
545
.2 /
11.1
% M
ale
/ Fem
ale
40%
/ 60
%43
% /
57%
% W
hite
/ M
inor
ity54
% /
46%
39%
/ 61
%
Med
ian
Annu
al F
T Ba
se S
alar
y$6
6,66
1$6
5,29
9
% A
ttriti
on10
%6%
% E
ligib
le to
Ret
ire25
%19
%
% N
ew H
ires
8%5%
% U
nion
Rep
rese
nted
10%
93%
MAY
ORA
LTY
City
wid
e
MMAY
ORA
LTY
MAY
ORA
LTY
City
wid
e
## in
Age
ncy
% o
f Age
ncy
% o
f City
wid
eM
edia
n Ye
ars
of S
ervi
ce%
Ret
irem
ent
Elig
ible
% A
ttriti
on R
ate
% N
ew
Hire
s
247
28.2
%10
0.0%
5.1
15.8
%6.
7%10
.0%
8810
.1%
100.
0%8.
319
.3%
12.7
%6.
9%
718.
1%10
0.0%
3.9
1.4%
18.4
%10
.3%
637.
2%10
0.0%
2.0
4.8%
13.7
%23
.3%
627.
1%2.
6%14
.537
.1%
8.7%
0.0%
232.
6%3.
4%18
.543
.5%
8.0%
0.0%
212.
4%10
0.0%
20.9
47.6
%4.
5%0.
0%
192.
2%10
0.0%
25.4
84.2
%5.
0%0.
0%
161.
8%5.
3%5.
712
.5%
5.9%
11.8
%
151.
7%0.
3%24
.153
.3%
0.0%
0.0%
Stat
us#
in A
genc
y%
of A
genc
yM
edia
n Ag
eM
edia
n Ye
ars
of S
ervi
ce%
Elig
ible
(2
012)
% E
ligib
le
(201
3 -
2017
)#
Elig
. (2
012
- 20
17)
New
Hire
s77
8.2%
27.5
0.6
35.8
%13
.3%
81
Dec
ease
d2
0.2%
N/A
N/A
22.5
%10
.4%
82
Dism
issal
s1
0.1%
N/A
N/A
19.6
%9.
3%28
Layo
ffs0
0.0%
N/A
N/A
22.8
%8.
0%10
0
Resig
ned
838.
9%31
.22.
9N
/AN
/AN
/A
Retir
emen
t9
1.0%
62.9
32.3
25.0
%0.
0%1
Sepa
ratio
n of
Tem
p. W
orke
rs0
0.0%
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
City
wid
e
May
oral
ty: F
Y12
Med
ian
Age
Wor
kfor
ce P
rofil
e
M
ayor
alty
inclu
des m
ayor
al o
ffice
s res
pons
ible
for d
irect
ing
the
adm
inist
ratio
n of
the
affa
irs a
nd c
ondu
ct o
f the
bus
ines
s of t
he c
ity, s
uch
as th
e M
ayor
's ex
ecut
ive st
aff,
Dep
uty
May
ors a
nd re
late
d st
aff,
Offi
ce o
f Con
tract
s, O
ffice
of M
anag
emen
t of B
udge
t, O
ffice
of
Labo
r Rel
atio
ns, a
nd o
ther
Offi
ces o
f the
May
or.
Empl
oyee
Typ
e
33.6
42.9
32.5
31.3
48.5
50.1
48.6
59.2
42.1
56.3
Activ
ity S
tatu
sRe
tirem
ent E
ligib
ility
Skille
d Cr
aft W
orke
rs
Teac
hers
Tech
nici
ans
Cate
gorie
s
Adm
inist
rativ
e Su
ppor
t
Offi
cial
s an
d Ad
min
istra
tors
Para
prof
essio
nals
Prof
essio
nals
N
/A a
ppea
rs w
here
the
popu
latio
n ha
s fe
wer
than
5 e
mpl
oyee
s or
ther
e ar
e no
reco
rds
avai
labl
e, a
nd th
eref
ore,
no
calc
ulat
ions
wer
e m
ade.
Dem
ogra
phic
s Full-
Tim
e Em
ploy
ee T
itle
Budg
et A
naly
st (O
MB)
May
oral
Offi
ce A
ssist
ant
Spec
ial A
ssist
ant
Rese
arch
Pro
ject
s Co
ordi
nato
r
Adm
inist
rativ
e St
aff A
naly
st
Adm
inist
rativ
e M
anag
er
May
oral
Pro
gram
Coo
rdin
ator
Stat
istic
al S
ecre
tary
(OM
B)
Exec
utiv
e Ag
ency
Cou
nsel
Prin
cipa
l Adm
inist
rativ
e As
soci
ate
Top
10 M
ost P
opul
ous
Full-
Tim
e Ti
tles
Prot
ectiv
e Se
rvic
e W
orke
rs
Serv
ice
Mai
nten
ance
$16
8,54
0
$10
3,65
1
$35
,962
$
31,8
28
$66
,661
$
65,2
99
MAY
ORA
LTY
City
wid
e
Ann
ual F
T Sa
lary
60%
57
%
40%
43
%
MAY
ORA
LTY
City
wid
e
Gen
der
Fem
ale
Mal
e
82%
8%
10%
Activ
eN
ew H
ires
Attri
tion
89%
5% 6%
8%
83%
10%
Pe
rman
ent
Prov
ision
al
62%
7%
31%
100%
0%
Civil
ian
Unifo
rm
82%
18%
99%
1%
Full-
time
FTE
54%
39%
17%
32%
15%
20
%
14%
8%
MAY
ORA
LTY
City
wid
e
Ethn
icity
W
hite
Blac
kH
ispan
icAs
ian/
Pacif
ic Is
land
erAm
. Ind
ian/
Ala
skan
Nat
ive
93%
7%
37%
22%
13%
7%
7%
7%
5%
2%
1%
0 to
4
5 to
9
10 to
14
15 to
19
20 to
24
25 to
29
30 to
34
35 to
40
40
+
22%
23%
19%
12%
12%
7%
3%
1%
0%
Year
s of S
ervic
e
0%
4%
22%
13%
11%
12%
12%
10%
9%
6%
<
20
20 to
24
30 to
34
35 to
39
40 to
44
45 to
49
50 to
54
55 to
59
60 to
64
6
5+
1%
2%
13%
13%
15%
15%
15%
13%
8%
4%
Age
Agen
cy O
verv
iew
:
5th
to 9
5th
Perc
entil
e M
edia
n
Not
es:
89
IIndi
cato
rN
YCH
ACi
tyw
ide
Hea
dcou
nt (F
T / F
TE)
11,2
93 /
302
304,
066
/ 23,
727
Med
ian
Age
/ Yea
rs o
f Ser
vice
48.3
/ 14
.245
.2 /
11.1
% M
ale
/ Fem
ale
60%
/ 38
%43
% /
57%
% W
hite
/ M
inor
ity21
% /
79%
39%
/ 61
%
Med
ian
Annu
al F
T Ba
se S
alar
y$4
0,62
4$6
5,29
9
% A
ttriti
on9%
6%
% E
ligib
le to
Ret
ire29
%19
%
% N
ew H
ires
7%5%
% U
nion
Rep
rese
nted
92%
93%
NYC
HA
City
wid
e
NNYC
HA
NYC
HA
City
wid
e
## in
Age
ncy
% o
f Age
ncy
% o
f City
wid
eM
edia
n Ye
ars
of S
ervi
ce%
Ret
irem
ent
Elig
ible
% A
ttriti
on R
ate
% N
ew
Hire
s
3,11
126
.8%
100.
0%9.
715
.2%
7.3%
9.8%
858
7.4%
83.5
%18
.839
.6%
6.3%
10.7
%
854
7.4%
100.
0%17
.036
.7%
6.5%
3.0%
622
5.4%
54.8
%13
.930
.1%
6.2%
0.0%
350
3.0%
100.
0%16
.024
.6%
4.6%
0.0%
212
1.8%
48.4
%11
.726
.9%
14.9
%3.
2%
212
1.8%
9.0%
17.7
34.4
%7.
4%8.
3%
206
1.8%
92.0
%18
.840
.8%
5.9%
2.7%
195
1.7%
100.
0%22
.134
.9%
4.9%
0.0%
194
1.7%
86.2
%16
.525
.3%
8.1%
0.0%
Stat
us#
in A
genc
y%
of A
genc
yM
edia
n Ag
eM
edia
n Ye
ars
of S
ervi
ce%
Elig
ible
(2
012)
% E
ligib
le
(201
3 -
2017
)#
Elig
. (2
012
- 20
17)
New
Hire
s84
56.
6%31
.00.
233
.2%
20.8
%59
7
Dec
ease
d29
0.2%
56.9
17.1
44.0
%28
.1%
809
Dism
issal
s41
13.
2%43
.42.
018
.4%
15.2
%20
3
Layo
ffs0
0.0%
N/A
N/A
43.1
%23
.9%
1,27
9
Resig
ned
211
1.7%
40.3
2.2
1.5%
17.6
%13
Retir
emen
t36
02.
8%62
.624
.517
.3%
18.1
%1,
495
Sepa
ratio
n of
Tem
p. W
orke
rs16
91.
3%22
.5N
/A36
.6%
26.7
%1,
339
N/A
N/A
N/A
23.7
%23
.7%
204
City
wid
e
New
Yor
k Ci
ty H
ousin
g Au
thor
ity: F
Y12
Med
ian
Age
Wor
kfor
ce P
rofil
e
Th
e N
ew Y
ork
City
Hou
sing
Auth
ority
(NYC
HA)
pro
vides
affo
rdab
le h
ousin
g to
ove
r 404
,000
low
- and
mod
erat
e in
com
e Ci
ty re
siden
ts in
334
hou
sing
deve
lopm
ents
with
nea
rly 1
79,0
00 a
partm
ents
in th
e fiv
e bo
roug
hs.
Empl
oyee
Typ
e
43.2
50.7
51.0
48.7
45.9
50.2
50.8
51.5
47.0
49.1
Activ
ity S
tatu
sRe
tirem
ent E
ligib
ility
Skille
d Cr
aft W
orke
rs
Teac
hers
Tech
nici
ans
Cate
gorie
s
Adm
inist
rativ
e Su
ppor
t
Offi
cial
s an
d Ad
min
istra
tors
Para
prof
essio
nals
Prof
essio
nals
N
/A a
ppea
rs w
here
the
popu
latio
n ha
s fe
wer
than
5 e
mpl
oyee
s or
ther
e ar
e no
reco
rds
avai
labl
e, a
nd th
eref
ore,
no
calc
ulat
ions
wer
e m
ade.
Dem
ogra
phic
s Full-
Tim
e Em
ploy
ee T
itle
Care
take
r (H
ousin
g Au
thor
ity)
Mai
nten
ance
Wor
ker
Hou
sing
Assis
tant
Secr
etar
y
Hea
ting
Plan
t Tec
hnic
ian
(Hou
sing
Auth
ority
)
Carp
ente
r
Adm
inist
rativ
e St
aff A
naly
st
Plas
tere
r
Assis
tant
Res
iden
t Bui
ldin
gs S
uper
inte
nden
t
Elev
ator
Mec
hani
c
Top
10 M
ost P
opul
ous
Full-
Tim
e Ti
tles
Prot
ectiv
e Se
rvic
e W
orke
rs
Serv
ice
Mai
nten
ance
$89
,759
$10
3,65
1
$27
,677
$
31,8
28
$40
,624
$65
,299
NYC
HA
City
wid
e
Ann
ual F
T Sa
lary
38%
57
%
60%
43
%
NYC
HA
City
wid
e
Gen
der
Fem
ale
Mal
e
84%
7% 9%
Activ
eN
ew H
ires
Attri
tion
89%
5% 6%
52%
11%
36%
Perm
anen
t
Prov
ision
al
62%
7%
31%
100%
0%
Civil
ian
Unifo
rm
82%
18%
97%
3%
Full-
time
FTE
21%
39%
48%
32%
25%
20
%
5%
8%
NYC
HA
City
wid
e
Ethn
icity
W
hite
Blac
kH
ispan
icAs
ian/
Pacif
ic Is
land
erAm
. Ind
ian/
Ala
skan
Nat
ive
93%
7%
23%
11%
19%
16%
17%
9%
4%
1%
0%
0 to
4
5 to
9
10 to
14
15 to
19
20 to
24
25 to
29
30 to
34
35 to
40
40
+
22%
23%
19%
12%
12%
7%
3%
1%
0%
Year
s of S
ervic
e
1%
4%
7%
10%
14%
19%
19%
15%
8%
3%
<
20
20 to
24
30 to
34
35 to
39
40 to
44
45 to
49
50 to
54
55 to
59
60 to
64
6
5+
1%
2%
13%
13%
15%
15%
15%
13%
8%
4%
Age
Agen
cy O
verv
iew
:
5th
to 9
5th
Perc
entil
e M
edia
n
Not
es:
90
IIndi
cato
rO
ATH
City
wid
e
Hea
dcou
nt (F
T / F
TE)
238
/ 134
304,
066
/ 23,
727
Med
ian
Age
/ Yea
rs o
f Ser
vice
51.6
/ 7.
745
.2 /
11.1
% M
ale
/ Fem
ale
38%
/ 61
%43
% /
57%
% W
hite
/ M
inor
ity50
% /
50%
39%
/ 61
%
Med
ian
Annu
al F
T Ba
se S
alar
y$6
1,08
6$6
5,29
9
% A
ttriti
on12
%6%
% E
ligib
le to
Ret
ire29
%19
%
% N
ew H
ires
9%5%
% U
nion
Rep
rese
nted
88%
93%
OAT
HCi
tyw
ide
OOAT
H
OAT
HCi
tyw
ide
## in
Age
ncy
% o
f Age
ncy
% o
f City
wid
eM
edia
n Ye
ars
of S
ervi
ce%
Ret
irem
ent
Elig
ible
% A
ttriti
on R
ate
% N
ew
Hire
s
287.
5%0.
7%7.
921
.4%
7.3%
0.0%
225.
9%3.
5%6.
022
.7%
4.3%
0.0%
133.
5%0.
3%24
.353
.8%
7.1%
0.0%
113.
0%0.
5%15
.345
.5%
7.1%
0.0%
102.
7%10
0.0%
14.6
40.0
%0.
0%0.
0%
92.
4%1.
3%24
.455
.6%
0.0%
0.0%
82.
2%2.
6%8.
250
.0%
11.1
%0.
0%
71.
9%0.
6%17
.157
.1%
0.0%
0.0%
61.
6%5.
2%25
.910
0.0%
40.0
%0.
0%
61.
6%0.
8%11
.10.
0%14
.3%
0.0%
Stat
us#
in A
genc
y%
of A
genc
yM
edia
n Ag
eM
edia
n Ye
ars
of S
ervi
ce%
Elig
ible
(2
012)
% E
ligib
le
(201
3 -
2017
)#
Elig
. (2
012
- 20
17)
New
Hire
s43
9.4%
36.6
0.4
25.9
%17
.2%
25
Dec
ease
d1
0.2%
N/A
N/A
28.0
%8.
0%9
Dism
issal
s10
2.2%
39.7
4.2
15.8
%10
.5%
15
Layo
ffs0
0.0%
N/A
N/A
32.7
%20
.0%
137
Resig
ned
337.
2%41
.42.
5N
/AN
/AN
/A
Retir
emen
t10
2.2%
65.0
16.2
50.0
%0.
0%1
Sepa
ratio
n of
Tem
p. W
orke
rs0
0.0%
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.0%
33.3
%1
City
wid
e
Offi
ce o
f Adm
inist
rativ
e Tr
ials
and
Hea
rings
: FY1
2
Med
ian
Age
Wor
kfor
ce P
rofil
e
Th
e O
ffice
of A
dmin
istra
tive
Tria
ls an
d H
earin
gs (O
ATH
) is a
n in
depe
nden
t, ce
ntra
l cou
rt th
at c
onsis
ts o
f fou
r trib
unal
s: th
e O
ATH
Trib
unal
, the
Env
ironm
enta
l Con
trol B
oard
(ECB
), th
e O
ATH
Tax
i and
Lim
ousin
e Tr
ibun
al a
nd th
e O
ATH
Hea
lth T
ribun
al.
Empl
oyee
Typ
e
42.5
52.3
50.9
46.2
53.5
51.7
51.5
52.2
65.1
41.7
Activ
ity S
tatu
sRe
tirem
ent E
ligib
ility
Skille
d Cr
aft W
orke
rs
Teac
hers
Tech
nici
ans
Cate
gorie
s
Adm
inist
rativ
e Su
ppor
t
Offi
cial
s an
d Ad
min
istra
tors
Para
prof
essio
nals
Prof
essio
nals
N
/A a
ppea
rs w
here
the
popu
latio
n ha
s fe
wer
than
5 e
mpl
oyee
s or
ther
e ar
e no
reco
rds
avai
labl
e, a
nd th
eref
ore,
no
calc
ulat
ions
wer
e m
ade.
Dem
ogra
phic
s Full-
Tim
e Em
ploy
ee T
itle
Cler
ical
Ass
ocia
te
Agen
cy A
ttorn
ey
Prin
cipa
l Adm
inist
rativ
e As
soci
ate
Com
mun
ity A
ssoc
iate
Adm
inist
rativ
e La
w Ju
dge
Adm
inist
rativ
e M
anag
er
Exec
utiv
e Ag
ency
Cou
nsel
Com
mun
ity C
oord
inat
or
Atto
rney
At L
aw
Com
mun
ity A
ssist
ant
Top
10 M
ost P
opul
ous
Full-
Tim
e Ti
tles
Prot
ectiv
e Se
rvic
e W
orke
rs
Serv
ice
Mai
nten
ance
$12
7,07
2
$10
3,65
1
$28
,593
$
31,8
28
$61
,086
$
65,2
99
OAT
HCi
tyw
ide
Ann
ual F
T Sa
lary
61%
57
%
38%
43
%
OAT
HCi
tyw
ide
Gen
der
Fem
ale
Mal
e
79%
9%
12%
Activ
eN
ew H
ires
Attri
tion
89%
5% 6%
20%
6%
75%
Pe
rman
ent
Prov
ision
al
62%
7%
31%
100%
0%
Civil
ian
Unifo
rm
82%
18%
64%
36%
Full-
time
FTE
50%
39%
33%
32%
10%
20%
7%
8%
OAT
HCi
tyw
ide
Ethn
icity
W
hite
Blac
kH
ispan
icAs
ian/
Pacif
ic Is
land
erAm
. Ind
ian/
Ala
skan
Nat
ive
93%
7%
37%
20%
11%
8%
11%
10%
3%
1%
0%
0 to
4
5 to
9
10 to
14
15 to
19
20 to
24
25 to
29
30 to
34
35 to
40
40
+
22%
23%
19%
12%
12%
7%
3%
1%
0%
Year
s of S
ervic
e
0%
5%
6%
7%
11%
10%
16%
15%
13%
15%
<
20
20 to
24
30 to
34
35 to
39
40 to
44
45 to
49
50 to
54
55 to
59
60 to
64
6
5+
1%
2%
13%
13%
15%
15%
15%
13%
8%
4%
Age
Agen
cy O
verv
iew
:
5th
to 9
5th
Perc
entil
e M
edia
n
Not
es:
91
IIndi
cato
rO
EMCi
tyw
ide
Hea
dcou
nt (F
T / F
TE)
108
/ 330
4,06
6 / 2
3,72
7
Med
ian
Age
/ Yea
rs o
f Ser
vice
34.8
/ 4.
345
.2 /
11.1
% M
ale
/ Fem
ale
58%
/ 40
%43
% /
57%
% W
hite
/ M
inor
ity64
% /
36%
39%
/ 61
%
Med
ian
Annu
al F
T Ba
se S
alar
y$6
8,07
1$6
5,29
9
% A
ttriti
on9%
6%
% E
ligib
le to
Ret
ire6%
19%
% N
ew H
ires
13%
5%
% U
nion
Rep
rese
nted
20%
93%
OEM
City
wid
e
OOEM
OEM
City
wid
e
## in
Age
ncy
% o
f Age
ncy
% o
f City
wid
eM
edia
n Ye
ars
of S
ervi
ce%
Ret
irem
ent
Elig
ible
% A
ttriti
on R
ate
% N
ew
Hire
s
4742
.3%
100.
0%3.
60.
0%7.
5%15
.1%
2118
.9%
100.
0%5.
49.
5%12
.5%
4.2%
98.
1%0.
4%9.
911
.1%
10.0
%0.
0%
65.
4%0.
5%2.
816
.7%
0.0%
28.6
%
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Stat
us#
in A
genc
y%
of A
genc
yM
edia
n Ag
eM
edia
n Ye
ars
of S
ervi
ce%
Elig
ible
(2
012)
% E
ligib
le
(201
3 -
2017
)#
Elig
. (2
012
- 20
17)
New
Hire
s15
12.9
%28
.30.
710
0.0%
0.0%
1
Dec
ease
d0
0.0%
N/A
N/A
11.4
%5.
7%6
Dism
issal
s0
0.0%
N/A
N/A
9.1%
0.0%
1
Layo
ffs0
0.0%
N/A
N/A
0.0%
0.0%
0
Resig
ned
119.
5%35
.44.
1N
/AN
/AN
/A
Retir
emen
t0
0.0%
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Sepa
ratio
n of
Tem
p. W
orke
rs0
0.0%
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
City
wid
e
Offi
ce o
f Em
erge
ncy
Man
agem
ent:
FY12
Med
ian
Age
Wor
kfor
ce P
rofil
e
Th
e O
ffice
of E
mer
genc
y M
anag
emen
t (O
EM) c
oord
inat
es a
nd su
ppor
ts m
ultia
genc
y re
spon
ses
to, a
nd re
gula
rly m
onito
rs, e
mer
genc
y co
nditi
ons a
nd o
ther
pot
entia
l inc
iden
ts th
at a
ffect
pub
lic h
ealth
and
safe
ty in
the
City
, inc
ludi
ng se
vere
wea
ther
, nat
ural
haz
ards
and
di
sast
ers,
pow
er o
utag
es, t
rans
porta
tion
incid
ents
, lab
or d
isrup
tions
, avia
tion
disa
ster
s and
act
s of t
erro
rism
.
Empl
oyee
Typ
e
34.0
38.1
44.7
30.2
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Activ
ity S
tatu
sRe
tirem
ent E
ligib
ility
Skille
d Cr
aft W
orke
rs
Teac
hers
Tech
nici
ans
Cate
gorie
s
Adm
inist
rativ
e Su
ppor
t
Offi
cial
s an
d Ad
min
istra
tors
Para
prof
essio
nals
Prof
essio
nals
N
/A a
ppea
rs w
here
the
popu
latio
n ha
s fe
wer
than
5 e
mpl
oyee
s or
ther
e ar
e no
reco
rds
avai
labl
e, a
nd th
eref
ore,
no
calc
ulat
ions
wer
e m
ade.
Dem
ogra
phic
s Full-
Tim
e Em
ploy
ee T
itle
Emer
genc
y Pr
epar
edne
ss S
peci
alist
(OEM
)
Emer
genc
y Pr
epar
edne
ss M
anag
er (O
EM)
Adm
inist
rativ
e St
aff A
naly
st
Com
mun
ity C
oord
inat
or
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Top
10 M
ost P
opul
ous
Full-
Tim
e Ti
tles
Prot
ectiv
e Se
rvic
e W
orke
rs
Serv
ice
Mai
nten
ance
$12
7,62
9
$10
3,65
1
$45
,615
$31
,828
$68
,071
$
65,2
99
OEM
City
wid
e
Ann
ual F
T Sa
lary
40%
57
%
58%
43
%
OEM
City
wid
e
Gen
der
Fem
ale
Mal
e
78%
13%
9%
Activ
eN
ew H
ires
Attri
tion
89%
5% 6%
0%
86%
14%
Pe
rman
ent
Prov
ision
al
62%
7%
31%
100%
0%
Civil
ian
Unifo
rm
82%
18%
97%
3%
Full-
time
FTE
64%
39%
15%
32%
13%
20
%
8%
8%
OEM
City
wid
e
Ethn
icity
W
hite
Blac
kH
ispan
icAs
ian/
Pacif
ic Is
land
erAm
. Ind
ian/
Ala
skan
Nat
ive
93%
7%
55%
31%
9%
3%
0%
2%
0%
0%
0%
0 to
4
5 to
9
10 to
14
15 to
19
20 to
24
25 to
29
30 to
34
35 to
40
40
+
22%
23%
19%
12%
12%
7%
3%
1%
0%
Year
s of S
ervic
e
0%
1%
41%
22%
17%
8%
2%
6%
1%
1%
<
20
20 to
24
30 to
34
35 to
39
40 to
44
45 to
49
50 to
54
55 to
59
60 to
64
6
5+
1%
2%
13%
13%
15%
15%
15%
13%
8%
4%
Age
Agen
cy O
verv
iew
:
5th
to 9
5th
Perc
entil
e M
edia
n
Not
es:
92
IIndi
cato
rN
YPD
City
wid
e
Hea
dcou
nt (F
T / F
TE)
48,7
48 /
1,57
730
4,06
6 / 2
3,72
7
Med
ian
Age
/ Yea
rs o
f Ser
vice
40 /
10.6
45.2
/ 11
.1
% M
ale
/ Fem
ale
66%
/ 34
%43
% /
57%
% W
hite
/ M
inor
ity41
% /
59%
39%
/ 61
%
Med
ian
Annu
al F
T Ba
se S
alar
y$7
6,48
8$6
5,29
9
% A
ttriti
on5%
6%
% E
ligib
le to
Ret
ire20
%19
%
% N
ew H
ires
5%5%
% U
nion
Rep
rese
nted
99%
93%
NYP
DCi
tyw
ide
NNYP
D
NYP
DCi
tyw
ide
## in
Age
ncy
% o
f Age
ncy
% o
f City
wid
eM
edia
n Ye
ars
of S
ervi
ce%
Ret
irem
ent
Elig
ible
% A
ttriti
on R
ate
% N
ew
Hire
s
21,9
9643
.7%
100.
0%7.
57.
3%3.
9%8.
6%
5,03
510
.0%
100.
0%18
.335
.4%
7.7%
0.0%
4,78
59.
5%10
0.0%
8.1
15.2
%4.
1%6.
7%
4,63
59.
2%10
0.0%
14.6
23.9
%5.
3%0.
0%
2,38
44.
7%10
0.0%
5.7
14.6
%4.
5%6.
0%
1,74
63.
5%10
0.0%
19.0
48.2
%8.
2%0.
0%
1,44
42.
9%10
0.0%
12.9
36.5
%5.
5%0.
0%
1,04
72.
1%10
0.0%
9.8
13.1
%5.
9%3.
6%
846
1.7%
100.
0%21
.949
.9%
3.6%
0.0%
759
1.5%
100.
0%24
.073
.5%
6.1%
0.0%
Stat
us#
in A
genc
y%
of A
genc
yM
edia
n Ag
eM
edia
n Ye
ars
of S
ervi
ce%
Elig
ible
(2
012)
% E
ligib
le
(201
3 -
2017
)#
Elig
. (2
012
- 20
17)
New
Hire
s2,
730
5.1%
26.8
0.8
35.5
%20
.7%
2,28
2
Dec
ease
d55
0.1%
52.3
15.6
36.0
%26
.8%
4,69
0
Dism
issal
s12
60.
2%43
.18.
320
.3%
3.1%
15
Layo
ffs0
0.0%
N/A
N/A
39.2
%18
.0%
448
Resig
ned
627
1.2%
31.2
2.6
14.4
%15
.2%
10,9
74
Retir
emen
t1,
903
3.6%
47.4
22.0
37.2
%18
.0%
218
Sepa
ratio
n of
Tem
p. W
orke
rs0
0.0%
N/A
N/A
38.0
%25
.7%
320
N/A
N/A
N/A
46.6
%20
.5%
108
City
wid
e
Polic
e D
epar
tmen
t: FY
12
Med
ian
Age
Wor
kfor
ce P
rofil
e
Th
e Po
lice
Dep
artm
ent (
NYP
D) i
s com
mitt
ed to
pro
vidin
g, w
ith th
e ut
mos
t int
egrit
y an
d re
spec
t, a
safe
and
secu
re e
nviro
nmen
t for
the
publ
ic. T
he p
erso
nnel
ass
igne
d to
the
Dep
artm
ent's
76
prec
inct
s, 12
Tra
nsit
Dist
ricts
, nin
e H
ousin
g Po
lice
Serv
ice A
reas
and
oth
er
inve
stig
ativ
e an
d sp
ecia
lized
uni
ts p
rote
ct li
fe a
nd d
eter
crim
e w
hile
resp
ondi
ng to
em
erge
ncy
calls
and
impa
rtial
ly en
forc
ing
the
law
.
Empl
oyee
Typ
e
34.0
42.6
41.6
40.7
41.6
43.2
50.9
41.4
52.7
46.3
Activ
ity S
tatu
sRe
tirem
ent E
ligib
ility
Skille
d Cr
aft W
orke
rs
Teac
hers
Tech
nici
ans
Cate
gorie
s
Adm
inist
rativ
e Su
ppor
t
Offi
cial
s an
d Ad
min
istra
tors
Para
prof
essio
nals
Prof
essio
nals
N
/A a
ppea
rs w
here
the
popu
latio
n ha
s fe
wer
than
5 e
mpl
oyee
s or
ther
e ar
e no
reco
rds
avai
labl
e, a
nd th
eref
ore,
no
calc
ulat
ions
wer
e m
ade.
Dem
ogra
phic
s Full-
Tim
e Em
ploy
ee T
itle
Polic
e O
ffice
r
Det
ectiv
e
Scho
ol S
afet
y Ag
ent
Serg
eant
(Pol
ice)
Traf
fic E
nfor
cem
ent A
gent
Lieu
tena
nt (P
olic
e)
Polic
e Ad
min
istra
tive
Aide
Polic
e Co
mm
unic
atio
ns T
echn
icia
n
Seni
or P
olic
e Ad
min
istra
tive
Aide
Capt
ain
(Pol
ice)
Top
10 M
ost P
opul
ous
Full-
Tim
e Ti
tles
Prot
ectiv
e Se
rvic
e W
orke
rs
Serv
ice
Mai
nten
ance
$11
2,57
4
$10
3,65
1
$35
,285
$
31,8
28
$76
,488
$
65,2
99
NYP
DCi
tyw
ide
Ann
ual F
T Sa
lary
34%
57
%
66%
43
%
NYP
DCi
tyw
ide
Gen
der
Fem
ale
Mal
e
90%
5% 5%
Ac
tive
New
Hire
sAt
tritio
n89
%
5% 6%
93%
1%
6%
Perm
anen
t
Prov
ision
al
62%
7%
31%
32%
68%
Ci
vilia
n
Unifo
rm
82%
18%
97%
3%
Full-
time
FTE
41%
39
%
28%
32
%
24%
20
%
6%
8%
NYP
DCi
tyw
ide
Ethn
icity
W
hite
Blac
kH
ispan
icAs
ian/
Pacif
ic Is
land
erAm
. Ind
ian/
Ala
skan
Nat
ive
93%
7%
20%
29%
17%
15%
11%
5%
2%
0%
0%
0 to
4
5 to
9
10 to
14
15 to
19
20 to
24
25 to
29
30 to
34
35 to
40
40
+
22%
23%
19%
12%
12%
7%
3%
1%
0%
Year
s of S
ervic
e
0%
4%
19%
19%
22%
16%
9%
5%
3%
2%
<
20
20 to
24
30 to
34
35 to
39
40 to
44
45 to
49
50 to
54
55 to
59
60 to
64
6
5+
1%
2%
13%
13%
15%
15%
15%
13%
8%
4%
Age
Agen
cy O
verv
iew
:
5th
to 9
5th
Perc
entil
e M
edia
n
Not
es:
93
Indi
cato
rSC
ACi
tyw
ide
Hea
dcou
nt (F
T / F
TE)
660
/ 030
4,06
6 / 2
3,72
7
Med
ian
Age
/ Yea
rs o
f Ser
vice
52.4
/ 11
.445
.2 /
11.1
% M
ale
/ Fem
ale
65%
/ 35
%43
% /
57%
% W
hite
/ M
inor
ity47
% /
53%
39%
/ 61
%
Med
ian
Annu
al F
T Ba
se S
alar
y$1
00,4
00$6
5,29
9
% A
ttriti
on4%
6%
% E
ligib
le to
Ret
ire14
%19
%
% N
ew H
ires
2%5%
% U
nion
Rep
rese
nted
44%
93%
SCA
City
wid
e
SCA
SCA
City
wid
e
# in
Age
ncy
% o
f Age
ncy
% o
f City
wid
eM
edia
n Ye
ars
of S
ervi
ce%
Ret
irem
ent
Elig
ible
% A
ttriti
on R
ate
% N
ew
Hire
s
108
16.4
%10
0.0%
11.0
24.1
%6.
1%0.
9%
406.
1%10
0.0%
13.3
12.5
%2.
4%0.
0%
406.
1%10
0.0%
14.5
7.5%
2.4%
0.0%
314.
7%10
0.0%
21.6
19.4
%8.
8%2.
9%
243.
6%10
0.0%
13.0
8.3%
0.0%
0.0%
233.
5%10
0.0%
13.1
17.4
%4.
2%0.
0%
223.
3%10
0.0%
4.5
13.6
%0.
0%0.
0%
223.
3%20
.6%
4.8
18.2
%0.
0%0.
0%
192.
9%10
0.0%
4.5
0.0%
13.6
%4.
5%
172.
6%10
0.0%
7.1
0.0%
5.6%
5.6%
Stat
us#
in A
genc
y%
of A
genc
yM
edia
n Ag
eM
edia
n Ye
ars
of S
ervi
ce%
Elig
ible
(2
012)
% E
ligib
le
(201
3 -
2017
)#
Elig
. (2
012
- 20
17)
New
Hire
s14
2.0%
42.8
0.5
10.0
%10
.0%
12
Dec
ease
d0
0.0%
N/A
N/A
9.7%
48.4
%36
Dism
issal
s5
0.7%
N/A
N/A
2.1%
29.8
%15
Layo
ffs0
0.0%
N/A
N/A
17.8
%30
.2%
181
Resig
ned
111.
6%47
.84.
1N
/AN
/AN
/A
Retir
emen
t11
1.6%
70.8
16.1
N/A
N/A
N/A
Sepa
ratio
n of
Tem
p. W
orke
rs0
0.0%
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
12.3
%29
.8%
48
City
wid
e
Scho
ol C
onst
ruct
ion
Auth
ority
: FY1
2
Med
ian
Age
Wor
kfor
ce P
rofil
e
Th
e Sc
hool
Con
stru
ctio
n Au
thor
ity (S
CA) i
s the
age
ncy
acco
unta
ble
for n
ew sc
hool
con
stru
ctio
n an
d m
ajor
reno
vatio
ns to
old
er sc
hool
s. SC
A is
resp
onsib
le fo
r all
capi
tal p
lann
ing,
bud
getin
g, d
esig
n an
d op
erat
ions
. SCA
coo
rdin
ates
the
deve
lopm
ent o
f the
Dep
artm
ent o
f Ed
ucat
ion’
s Five
- Yea
r Cap
ital P
lan,
sele
cts a
nd a
cqui
res s
ites f
or n
ew sc
hool
s, le
ases
bui
ldin
gs fo
r sch
ools
and
supe
rvise
s con
vers
ion
of a
dmin
istra
tive
spac
e fo
r cla
ssro
om u
se.
Empl
oyee
Typ
e
55.4
54.0
50.9
56.4
52.9
53.3
35.7
51.8
52.0
45.2
Activ
ity S
tatu
sRe
tirem
ent E
ligib
ility
Skille
d Cr
aft W
orke
rs
Teac
hers
Tech
nici
ans
Cate
gorie
s
Adm
inist
rativ
e Su
ppor
t
Offi
cial
s an
d Ad
min
istra
tors
Para
prof
essio
nals
Prof
essio
nals
N
/A a
ppea
rs w
here
the
popu
latio
n ha
s fe
wer
than
5 e
mpl
oyee
s or
ther
e ar
e no
reco
rds
avai
labl
e, a
nd th
eref
ore,
no
calc
ulat
ions
wer
e m
ade.
Dem
ogra
phic
s Full-
Tim
e Em
ploy
ee T
itle
Proj
ect O
ffice
r
Tech
nica
l Ins
pect
or
Man
ager
Ope
ratio
ns
Engi
neer
Dire
ctor
Ope
ratio
ns
Seni
or P
roje
ct O
ffice
r
Asso
ciat
e En
gine
er
Arch
itect
Seni
or C
onst
ruct
ion
Asse
ssm
ent S
peci
alist
- A
Adm
inst
rativ
e As
sista
nt
Top
10 M
ost P
opul
ous
Full-
Tim
e Ti
tles
Prot
ectiv
e Se
rvic
e W
orke
rs
Serv
ice
Mai
nten
ance
$141
,108
$103
,651
$68,
568
$31,
828
$100
,400
$65,
299
SCA
City
wid
e
Annu
al F
T Sa
lary
35%
57%
65%
43%
SCA
City
wid
e
Gen
der
Fem
ale
Mal
e
94%
2% 4%Ac
tive
New
Hire
sAt
tritio
n89
%
5%6%
49%
7%
44%
Perm
anen
t
Prov
ision
al
62%
7%31
%
100%
0%Ci
vilia
n
Unifo
rm
82%
18%
100%
0%Fu
ll-tim
eFT
E
47%
39%
21%
32%
11%
20%
21%
8%
SCA
City
wid
e
Ethn
icity
Whi
teBl
ack
Hisp
anic
Asia
n/Pa
cific
Isla
nder
Am. I
ndia
n/ A
lask
an N
ativ
e
93%
7%
31%
13%
28%8%20%0%0%0%0%
0 to
4
5 to
9
10 to
14
15 to
19
20 to
24
25 to
29
30 to
34
35 to
40
40
+
22%
23%
19%
12%
12%
7%3%1%0%
Year
s of S
ervic
e
0%0%0%0%0%0%0%0%0%0% <
20
20 to
24
30 to
34
35 to
39
40 to
44
45 to
49
50 to
54
55 to
59
60 to
64
6
5+
1%2%13%
13%
15%
15%
15%
13%
8%4%
Age
Agen
cyO
verv
iew
:
5th
to 9
5th
Perc
entil
eM
edia
n
Not
es:
94
IIndi
cato
rTL
CCi
tyw
ide
Hea
dcou
nt (F
T / F
TE)
435
/ 26
304,
066
/ 23,
727
Med
ian
Age
/ Yea
rs o
f Ser
vice
42.3
/ 7
45.2
/ 11
.1
% M
ale
/ Fem
ale
62%
/ 37
%43
% /
57%
% W
hite
/ M
inor
ity29
% /
71%
39%
/ 61
%
Med
ian
Annu
al F
T Ba
se S
alar
y$3
9,20
5$6
5,29
9
% A
ttriti
on8%
6%
% E
ligib
le to
Ret
ire23
%19
%
% N
ew H
ires
20%
5%
% U
nion
Rep
rese
nted
90%
93%
TLC
City
wid
e
TTLC
TLC
City
wid
e
## in
Age
ncy
% o
f Age
ncy
% o
f City
wid
eM
edia
n Ye
ars
of S
ervi
ce%
Ret
irem
ent
Elig
ible
% A
ttriti
on R
ate
% N
ew
Hire
s
145
31.5
%10
0.0%
4.6
14.5
%7.
6%22
.3%
5712
.4%
100.
0%19
.531
.6%
3.4%
0.0%
337.
2%1.
4%4.
712
.1%
0.0%
21.1
%
337.
2%0.
8%21
.745
.5%
7.5%
0.0%
194.
1%0.
4%24
.957
.9%
17.4
%4.
3%
183.
9%2.
3%3.
916
.7%
0.0%
21.4
%
163.
5%0.
7%9.
725
.0%
11.1
%5.
6%
81.
7%0.
8%24
.662
.5%
11.1
%33
.3%
81.
7%6.
0%0.
30.
0%40
.0%
40.0
%
71.
5%14
.6%
5.9
28.6
%10
.0%
10.0
%
Stat
us#
in A
genc
y%
of A
genc
yM
edia
n Ag
eM
edia
n Ye
ars
of S
ervi
ce%
Elig
ible
(2
012)
% E
ligib
le
(201
3 -
2017
)#
Elig
. (2
012
- 20
17)
New
Hire
s97
19.7
%29
.20.
441
.4%
14.9
%49
Dec
ease
d1
0.2%
N/A
N/A
25.0
%25
.0%
16
Dism
issal
s7
1.4%
37.7
4.0
12.0
%2.
2%13
Layo
ffs0
0.0%
N/A
N/A
27.6
%6.
9%10
Resig
ned
163.
3%36
.13.
019
.3%
14.9
%69
Retir
emen
t17
3.5%
63.7
22.3
N/A
N/A
N/A
Sepa
ratio
n of
Tem
p. W
orke
rs0
0.0%
N/A
N/A
100.
0%0.
0%1
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.0%
12.5
%1
City
wid
e
Taxi
and
Lim
ousin
e Co
mm
issio
n: F
Y12
Med
ian
Age
Wor
kfor
ce P
rofil
e
Th
e Ta
xi an
d Lim
ousin
e Co
mm
issio
n (T
LC) e
stab
lishe
s and
enf
orce
s pro
fess
iona
l and
uni
form
stan
dard
s of f
or-h
ire se
rvice
and
ens
ures
pub
lic sa
fety
. TLC
lice
nses
and
regu
late
s all
aspe
cts o
f New
Yor
k Ci
ty's
med
allio
n (y
ello
w) t
axica
bs, f
or-h
ire v
ehicl
es (c
omm
unity
-bas
ed
liver
ies a
nd b
lack
car
s), c
omm
uter
van
s, pa
ratra
nsit
vehi
cles (
ambu
lette
s) a
nd c
erta
in lu
xury
lim
ousin
es.
Empl
oyee
Typ
e
39.8
48.9
33.2
52.1
53.0
37.0
41.9
51.2
38.8
45.4
Activ
ity S
tatu
sRe
tirem
ent E
ligib
ility
Skille
d Cr
aft W
orke
rs
Teac
hers
Tech
nici
ans
Cate
gorie
s
Adm
inist
rativ
e Su
ppor
t
Offi
cial
s an
d Ad
min
istra
tors
Para
prof
essio
nals
Prof
essio
nals
N
/A a
ppea
rs w
here
the
popu
latio
n ha
s fe
wer
than
5 e
mpl
oyee
s or
ther
e ar
e no
reco
rds
avai
labl
e, a
nd th
eref
ore,
no
calc
ulat
ions
wer
e m
ade.
Dem
ogra
phic
s Full-
Tim
e Em
ploy
ee T
itle
Taxi
and
Lim
ousin
e In
spec
tor
Asso
ciat
e Ta
xi an
d Li
mou
sine
Insp
ecto
r
Com
mun
ity A
ssoc
iate
Cler
ical
Ass
ocia
te
Prin
cipa
l Adm
inist
rativ
e As
soci
ate
Com
mun
ity A
ssist
ant
Adm
inist
rativ
e St
aff A
naly
st
Com
pute
r Spe
cial
ist (S
oftw
are)
Cler
ical
Aid
e
Cash
ier
Top
10 M
ost P
opul
ous
Full-
Tim
e Ti
tles
Prot
ectiv
e Se
rvic
e W
orke
rs
Serv
ice
Mai
nten
ance
$90
,953
$10
3,65
1
$31
,534
$
31,8
28
$39
,205
$65
,299
TLC
City
wid
e
Ann
ual F
T Sa
lary
37%
57
%
62%
43
%
TLC
City
wid
e
Gen
der
Fem
ale
Mal
e
72%
20%
8%
Activ
eN
ew H
ires
Attri
tion
89%
5% 6%
63%
13%
24
%
Perm
anen
t
Prov
ision
al
62%
7%
31%
100%
0%
Civil
ian
Unifo
rm
82%
18%
94%
6%
Full-
time
FTE
29%
39%
33%
32%
27%
20%
10%
8%
TLC
City
wid
e
Ethn
icity
W
hite
Blac
kH
ispan
icAs
ian/
Pacif
ic Is
land
erAm
. Ind
ian/
Ala
skan
Nat
ive
93%
7%
40%
18%
10%
9%
14%
6%
3%
0%
0%
0 to
4
5 to
9
10 to
14
15 to
19
20 to
24
25 to
29
30 to
34
35 to
40
40
+
22%
23%
19%
12%
12%
7%
3%
1%
0%
Year
s of S
ervic
e
1%
7%
13%
13%
13%
18%
11%
14%
7%
3%
<
20
20 to
24
30 to
34
35 to
39
40 to
44
45 to
49
50 to
54
55 to
59
60 to
64
6
5+
1%
2%
13%
13%
15%
15%
15%
13%
8%
4%
Age
Agen
cy O
verv
iew
:
5th
to 9
5th
Perc
entil
e M
edia
n
Not
es:
95