+ All Categories
Home > Documents > WorkIntensity,Low-GradeInflammation,andOxidativeStatus:A...

WorkIntensity,Low-GradeInflammation,andOxidativeStatus:A...

Date post: 12-Oct-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 0 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
8
Research Article Work Intensity, Low-Grade Inflammation, and Oxidative Status: A Comparison between Office and Slaughterhouse Workers Sieglinde Zelzer , 1 Franz Tatzber, 2 Markus Herrmann, 1 Willibald Wonisch , 3 Stefan Rinnerhofer, 4 Michael Kundi, 5 Barbara Obermayer-Pietsch, 6 Tobias Niedrist, 1 Gerhard Cvirn, 3 Georg Wultsch, 7 and Harald Mangge 1 1 Clinical Institute of Medical and Chemical Laboratory Diagnostics, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 29, 8036 Graz, Austria 2 Center of Molecular Medicine, Institute of Pathophysiology and Immunology, Medical University of Graz, Heinrichstrasse 31a, 8010 Graz, Austria 3 Institute of Physiological Chemistry, Center for Physiological Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Stiftingtalstrasse 6 M1/D/3, 8036 Graz, Austria 4 Exercise Physiology, Training and Training Therapy Research Group, Institute of Sports Science, University of Graz, Mozartgasse 14, 8010 Graz, Austria 5 Department of Environmental Health, Center for Public Health, Medical University Vienna, Kinderspitalgasse 15, 1090 Vienna, Austria 6 Division of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 15, 8036 Graz, Austria 7 Arbeitsmedizinisches Institut, Graz, Herrgottwiesgasse 149, 8055 Graz, Austria Correspondence should be addressed to Sieglinde Zelzer; [email protected] Received 15 December 2017; Accepted 11 March 2018; Published 18 April 2018 Academic Editor: Grzegorz Bartosz Copyright © 2018 Sieglinde Zelzer et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Limited knowledge exists about the impact of physical workload on oxidative stress in dierent occupational categories. Thus, we aimed to investigate the oxidative and inammatory status in employees with dierent physical workloads. We enrolled a total of 79 male subjects, 27 oce workers (mean age 38.8 ± 9.1 years) and 52 heavy workers, in a slaughterhouse (mean age 40.8 ± 8.2 years). Fasting blood was drawn from an antecubital vein in the morning of the midweek before an 8-hour or 12-hour work shift. The antioxidative capacity was assessed measuring total antioxidant capacity (TAC), uric acid, total polyphenols (PPm), and endogenous peroxidase activity (EPA). Total peroxides (TOC), malondialdehyde (MDA), and myeloperoxidase (MPO) were analyzed as prooxidative biomarkers, and an oxidative stress index (OSI) was calculated. In addition, hsCRP, interleukin-6 (IL-6), MDA-LDL IgM antibodies, galectin-3, adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), and the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) were measured as biomarkers of chronic systemic inammation and emotional stress. TOC (p =0 032), TAC (p <0 001), ACTH (p <0 001), OSI (p =0 011), and hsCRP (p =0 019) were signicantly increased in the heavy workers group, while EPA, BDNF (p <0 001), and polyphenols (p =0 004) were signicantly higher in oce workers. Comparison between 8 and 12 h shifts showed a worse psychological condition in heavy workers with increased levels for hsCRP (p =0 001) and reduced concentration of BDNF (p =0 012) compared to oce workers. Oxidative stress and inammation are induced in heavy workers and are particularly pronounced during long working hours, that is, 12-hour versus 8-hour shifts. Hindawi Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity Volume 2018, Article ID 2737563, 7 pages https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2737563
Transcript
Page 1: WorkIntensity,Low-GradeInflammation,andOxidativeStatus:A ...downloads.hindawi.com/journals/omcl/2018/2737563.pdfComparison between 8-hour and 12-hour shifts revealed significant differences

Research ArticleWork Intensity, Low-Grade Inflammation, and Oxidative Status: AComparison between Office and Slaughterhouse Workers

Sieglinde Zelzer ,1 Franz Tatzber,2 Markus Herrmann,1 Willibald Wonisch ,3

Stefan Rinnerhofer,4 Michael Kundi,5 Barbara Obermayer-Pietsch,6 Tobias Niedrist,1

Gerhard Cvirn,3 Georg Wultsch,7 and Harald Mangge1

1Clinical Institute of Medical and Chemical Laboratory Diagnostics, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 29,8036 Graz, Austria2Center of Molecular Medicine, Institute of Pathophysiology and Immunology, Medical University of Graz, Heinrichstrasse 31a,8010 Graz, Austria3Institute of Physiological Chemistry, Center for Physiological Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Stiftingtalstrasse 6 M1/D/3,8036 Graz, Austria4Exercise Physiology, Training and Training Therapy Research Group, Institute of Sports Science, University of Graz, Mozartgasse 14,8010 Graz, Austria5Department of Environmental Health, Center for Public Health, Medical University Vienna, Kinderspitalgasse 15,1090 Vienna, Austria6Division of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 15,8036 Graz, Austria7Arbeitsmedizinisches Institut, Graz, Herrgottwiesgasse 149, 8055 Graz, Austria

Correspondence should be addressed to Sieglinde Zelzer; [email protected]

Received 15 December 2017; Accepted 11 March 2018; Published 18 April 2018

Academic Editor: Grzegorz Bartosz

Copyright © 2018 Sieglinde Zelzer et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License,which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Limited knowledge exists about the impact of physical workload on oxidative stress in different occupational categories. Thus, weaimed to investigate the oxidative and inflammatory status in employees with different physical workloads. We enrolled a total of79 male subjects, 27 office workers (mean age 38.8± 9.1 years) and 52 heavy workers, in a slaughterhouse (mean age 40.8± 8.2years). Fasting blood was drawn from an antecubital vein in the morning of the midweek before an 8-hour or 12-hour work shift.The antioxidative capacity was assessed measuring total antioxidant capacity (TAC), uric acid, total polyphenols (PPm), andendogenous peroxidase activity (EPA). Total peroxides (TOC), malondialdehyde (MDA), and myeloperoxidase (MPO) wereanalyzed as prooxidative biomarkers, and an oxidative stress index (OSI) was calculated. In addition, hsCRP, interleukin-6(IL-6), MDA-LDL IgM antibodies, galectin-3, adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), and the brain-derived neurotrophicfactor (BDNF) were measured as biomarkers of chronic systemic inflammation and emotional stress. TOC (p = 0 032),TAC (p < 0 001), ACTH (p < 0 001), OSI (p = 0 011), and hsCRP (p = 0 019) were significantly increased in the heavyworkers group, while EPA, BDNF (p < 0 001), and polyphenols (p = 0 004) were significantly higher in office workers.Comparison between 8 and 12 h shifts showed a worse psychological condition in heavy workers with increased levels forhsCRP (p = 0 001) and reduced concentration of BDNF (p = 0 012) compared to office workers. Oxidative stress andinflammation are induced in heavy workers and are particularly pronounced during long working hours, that is, 12-hour versus8-hour shifts.

HindawiOxidative Medicine and Cellular LongevityVolume 2018, Article ID 2737563, 7 pageshttps://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2737563

Page 2: WorkIntensity,Low-GradeInflammation,andOxidativeStatus:A ...downloads.hindawi.com/journals/omcl/2018/2737563.pdfComparison between 8-hour and 12-hour shifts revealed significant differences

1. Introduction

Modern life-style, that is, physical inactivity and fast food aswell as occupational and environmental conditions, mayinduce oxidative stress. Different types of stress can be dis-tinguished at the cellular and tissue level—namely, photoox-idative stress, drug-dependent oxidative stress, metabolicoxidative stress, environmental oxidative stress, and nitrosa-tive stress [1].

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are endogenously gener-ated, among others, in the respiratory chain. Hence, meta-bolic activity increases ROS production. These species reactwith biological molecules like lipids, carbohydrates, proteins,and even DNA, which are associated with the pathogenesis ofdegenerative diseases. Oxidative stress (OS) is associated withchronic inflammation, with a potential impact on diabetesmellitus, atherosclerosis, and cardiovascular and neurodegen-erative diseases [2–5]. An increased consumption of oxygenduring physical exercise also increases ROS production lead-ing to oxidative stress and lipid peroxidation in athletes [6–8].Nevertheless, increased ROS production during sports is alsobeneficial because it stimulates the antioxidative system [9].Moreover, OS is a key factor during aging [10] together withother factors like deregulated autophagy, mitochondrial dys-function, and telomere shortening [11]. Besides its involve-ment in the physiologic process of aging, OS appears to playan important role in the pathophysiology of several occupa-tional diseases [12, 13]. Common problems in night and shiftworkers, such as fatigue, sleep problems, anxiety, difficultiesinmaintaining regular life-styles, and reduced recovery times,represent an increased health risk due to physiologicalexhaustion and a decreased capacity for regulation [14].

Nevertheless, there is limited knowledge about theimpact of physical workload on OS in different occupationalgroups. Heavy workers often suffer from excessive workloadand lack of social support. Shift work with extended workinghours might negatively affect the psychological status ofemployees and reduce their motivation. It can be hypothe-sized that high physical and emotional stress in heavyworkers is associated with increased OS and inflammation.

The present study aimed at comparing the oxidative andinflammatory status between office workers and heavyworkers with a particular focus on the biochemical effect ofextended working hours (8- to 12-hour shifts).

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Population. We enrolled 79 healthy male volun-teers between 18 and 65 years at their workplace. Thereof,27 employees were office workers (age 38.8± 9.1 years) and52 heavy workers in a slaughterhouse (age 40.8± 8.2 years).Exclusion criteria were infections, for example, flu-like infec-tion, chronic diseases, and certified reduced work capacitydue to illness. The study was approved by the ethics commit-tee of the Medical University of Graz (EK number 26-488 ex13/14) and conducted in compliance with guidelines forhuman studies as described in the Helsinki Declaration of1975, revised in 1996. Written inform consent was obtainedfrom all study participants.

2.2. Laboratory Analysis

2.2.1. Blood Sampling. Blood was drawn from an antecubitalvein between 6:00 a.m. and 6:30 a.m., before an 8-hour workshift from 79 workers (27 office and 52 heavy workers). In asubgroup of 26 office workers and 8 heavy workers, we inves-tigated the effects of twelve hours of work. Blood samplingwas performed in the midweek, Wednesdays or Thursdays.Samples were immediately transferred on ice to the Labwithin two hours, centrifuged, and stored at −80°C until use(6 to 13 months).

2.2.2. Inflammatory Parameters. High-sensitivity C-reactiveprotein (hsCRP) and interleukin 6 (IL-6) were determinedon a COBAS® 8000 analyzer with turbidimetric and electro-chemiluminescence immunoassays (ECLIA), respectively,from Roche Diagnostics (Rotkreuz, Switzerland). All mea-surements were batched into a single run. The total impreci-sion of both assays were below 5%. Galectin-3 was measuredusing the Human Galectin-3 Quantikine ELISA Kit fromR&D (Minneapolis, USA).

2.2.3. Oxidative Stress Biomarkers. Malondialdehyde (MDA)was determined by GC-MS from Thermo Fisher Scientific(CA, USA). After addition of MDA-d 2 as internal standard,derivatizationwith 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine, and chemicalionization in negative mode, the representative ions m/z 204(for MDA) andm/z 206 (for MDA-d 2) were recorded [15].

Colorimetricmethodswere used to determine total perox-ides (TOC), endogenous peroxidase activity (EPA), and thetotal antioxidant capacity (TAC) purchased fromLDN (LaborDiagnostika Nord, Nordhorn, Germany). These assays arebased on the reaction between hydrogen peroxide, horserad-ish peroxidase, and tetramethylbenzidine to give a blue-green colour. After the addition of the stop solution, thecolour changes to yellow, which can be measured at 450nm(reference wavelength 620nm). A linear standard curve wasused for quantification. The intra- and interassay coefficientsof variance were less than 5% for all assays [16]. MDA-LDLIgM was measured with the MDA-LDL-IgM ELISA fromOmnignostica Ltd. (Höflein/D., Austria), which is standard-ized on a human monoclonal antibody as described previ-ously [17]. Serum myeloperoxidase (MPO) concentrationswere measured with the MPO enzyme-linked immunosor-bent assay (ELISA) Kit (Immundiagnostik AG, Bensheim,Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.The total imprecision of both ELISA assays was below 7%.Uric acid was determined with the enzymatic colorimetrictest from Roche on a COBAS 8000 analyzer.

In the case of the brain-derived neurotrophic factor(BDNF), we used the Quantikine human BDNF immunoas-say from R&D systems (Minneapolis, USA). Adrenocortico-tropic hormone (ACTH) was determined with the ACTHELISA from Hölzel Diagnostica (Köln, Germany), and totalpolyphenols (PPm) were determined according to the manu-facturer’s instructions with an adapted Folin-Ciocalteumicrotitre method from Omnignostica Ltd. (Höflein/D.,Austria). In short, the principle of this method is based onthe reaction of polyphenols with transition metals. This leads

2 Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity

Page 3: WorkIntensity,Low-GradeInflammation,andOxidativeStatus:A ...downloads.hindawi.com/journals/omcl/2018/2737563.pdfComparison between 8-hour and 12-hour shifts revealed significant differences

to a dark-coloured complex, which can be measured at766nm. Samples are quantified by the use of a standard curvewith serial dilutions of a polyphenol standard. The intra- andinterassay coefficients of variance were less than 5%.

2.3. Statistical Analysis. Statistical analyses were carried outusing SPSS 23.0 for Windows 10 (IBM Corp., USA) and Stata12 (StataCorp, TX, USA). Comparisons between groups weredone by the use of the general linear model including bodymass index (BMI) as a covariate because heavy workers hadsignificantly higher BMI which itself could be related to oxi-dative stress and inflammation, as reported previously [18].Residuals of analyses were stored and tested for deviationsfrom a normal distribution by Kolmogorov-Smirnov testswith Lilliefors-corrected p values. In case of a significantdeviation, distribution of residuals was inspected, and in caseof a skewed distribution, a logarithmic transformation wasapplied. In all such cases, normality of residuals was obtainedafter transformation. Homogeneity of variance was tested byLevene’s tests. Data are summarized as means within groupsand 95% confidence intervals (back-transformed if necessaryto the original scale). A similar approach was applied forcomparison of 8 h versus 12 h shifts. In this case, thewithin-subject factor (8 h/12 h shift length) and between-subject factor groups (office versus heavy workers) and theirinteraction were tested by analysis of variance. Comparisonsof 8 h and 12 h shifts within groups were done by linearcontrasts. Variables were log-transformed in accordance withthe analysis of baseline data. Based on the ratio between ROSand serum antioxidant capacity, the oxidative stress index(OSI) was calculated using the formula TOC mmol/L /TA

C mmol/L × 100 . For all statistical tests, p < 0 05 was con-sidered significant.

3. Results

An overview about the anthropometric data of the studycohort is given in Table 1. Due to the fact that the BMI wassignificantly increased in heavy workers versus officeworkers, all further analyses were corrected with respect tothis biometric parameter, because BMI itself was shown tobe associated with OS [18].

Heavy workers had significantly increased TAC (p <0 001), TOC (p = 0 032), hsCRP (p = 0 019), and ACTH(p < 0 001) (for details, see Figures 1 and 2 and Table 1)and OSI levels (p = 0 011; Table 1). In contrast, EPA (p <0 001), polyphenols (p = 0 004), and BDNF (p < 0 001) levelswere significantly higher in office workers (Figures 3 and 4).Uric acid, MDA, MPO, IL-6, MDA-LDL IgM, and galectin-3 did not differ between the groups (Table 1).

Comparison between 8-hour and 12-hour shifts revealedsignificant differences exclusively after a 12-hour shift inheavy workers, that is, a significant increased ACTH level(p = 0 001), while BDNF was significantly decreased at over-time work (p = 0 012) (Table 2). Correlation analysisbetween oxidative stress biomarkers revealed a significantnegative correlation between TAC and EPA in both workinggroups whereas a positive correlation was found for TACand uric acid (Table 3). TOC correlated positively withhsCRP in both working groups (r = 0 612 and 0.493 in officeand heavy workers, resp.). In contrast, IL-6 was correlatedto TOC merely in office workers (r = 0 462), while the

Table 1: Baseline characteristics of study participants and results of measurements after an 8-hour work shift.

Office workers (n = 27) Heavy workers (n = 52)Mean (95% confidence interval) p

Age, yrs 38.2 (35.2–41.1) 40.8 (38.5–43.0) 0.175

Body mass index, kg/m2 26.1 (24.5–27.6) 28.3 (27.1–29.5) 0.026

hsCRP, mg/L 1.0 (0.7–1.5) 1.7 (1.4–2.2) 0.019

IL-6, pg/mL 1.9 (1.6–2.2) 2.0 (1.7–2.2) 0.220

Uric acid, mg/dL 5.3 (4.8–5.7) 5.6 (5.3–5.9) 0.245

Total antioxidant capacity, mmol/L 1.06 (0.91–1.21) 1.41 (1.29–1.53) <0.001Total oxidant capacity, mmol/L 0.08 (0.06–0.11) 0.12 (0.10–0.15) 0.032

Oxidative stress index (OSI), % 5.7 (3.5–8.4) 10.4 (8.2–12.8) 0.011

Endogenous peroxidase activity, U/L 7.2 (6.2–8.4) 3.7 (3.3-4.1) <0.001Polyphenols, mmol/L 9.9 (9.7–10.1) 9.5 (9.4–9.7) 0.004

Malondialdehyde, μmol/L 0.74 (0.68–0.80) 0.69 (0.65–0.73) 0.144

Myeloperoxidase, μg/L 61.7 (56.4–67.4) 68.3 (63.7–73.2) 0.078

MDA-LDL-IgM, U/L 184 (149–228) 150 (127–177) 0.141

ST2, ng/mL 14.5 (12.3–16.6) 15.3 (13.7–17.0) 0.521

ACTH, pg/mL 12.0 (9.1–16.0) 27.6 (22.2–34.4) <0.001Galectin-3, ng/mL 5.9 (5.0–6.9) 4.8 (4.2–5.4) 0.052

BDNF, pg/mL 22880 (16051–32616) 7417 (5651–9735) <0.001p values from the general linear model with body mass index included as covariate. hsCRP = high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; IL-6 = interleukin-6;OSI = oxidative stress index; ACTH= adrenocorticotropic hormone; ST2 = suppression of tumorigenicity 2; BDNF = brain-derived neurotrophic factor.

3Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity

Page 4: WorkIntensity,Low-GradeInflammation,andOxidativeStatus:A ...downloads.hindawi.com/journals/omcl/2018/2737563.pdfComparison between 8-hour and 12-hour shifts revealed significant differences

correlation with polyphenols was only significant in heavyworkers (r = 0 565). Furthermore, TAC showed a highlysignificant negative correlation with TOC in office workers(r = −0 526) (Table 3).

4. Discussion

In the present study, we indicated an increased inflamma-tion through raised hsCRP levels at baseline in heavyworkers compared to office workers. This was associatedwith oxidative stress, that is, increased total peroxides anda concomitant decrease of peroxidase activity. In addition,we observed a decrease in polyphenols, although the totalantioxidant capacity was increased (Table 1). OSI, whichreflects the redox balance between prooxidants and antioxi-dants, showed significant differences between these twoworking groups.

This was further related to psychological stress, due to anincrease in ACTH and a very low level of BDNF indicatingemotional stress (Table 1). In spite of significant differences

in several biomarkers between office workers and heavyworkers in a slaughterhouse, it must be emphasized that thismight even be an underestimation due to the working envi-ronment of the latter; that is, low temperatures were previ-ously associated with reduced OS [19, 20].

A stressful working environment may affect the healthof employees. Night shifts disrupt the circadian rhythmand increase OS [21]. There can be no doubt that a betterunderstanding of the main stressors in the workplace wouldbe effective in preventing disease and that determination ofoxidative stress biomarkers could be helpful in this context[7]. Since reduction of sickness-related absenteeism implieseconomic benefits, individual health care at the workplaceshould be given priority. Increased disease risks in workerswith demanding jobs have frequently been reported, amongothers by Ramey et al. [22]. Release of catecholamines andincreased blood pressure, along with chronic work-relatedstress, may lead to cardiovascular diseases. A combinationof psychological and physical stress could induce chronicinflammation and subsequent disease [23]. For such reasons,a dietary regimen including antioxidants was suggested

10

9

8

7

6

5

4

3

hsCR

P (m

g/L)

2

1

0Office workers Heavy workers

p = 0.019

Figure 2: Box plots (medians, interquartile, and nonoutlier ranges)of hsCRP by groups of workers.

16

14

12

10

8

6

4

2

00Office workers Heavy workers

p < 0.001

EPA

(U/L

)

Figure 3: Box plots (medians, interquartile, and nonoutlier ranges)of endogenous peroxidase activity by groups of workers.

45000

40000

35000

30000

25000

20000

15000

10000

5000

0Office workers Heavyworkers

BDN

F (p

g/m

L)p < 0.001

Figure 4: Box plots (medians, interquartile, and nonoutlier ranges)of brain-derived neurotrophic factor by groups of workers.

Figure 1: Box plots (medians, interquartile, and nonoutlier ranges)of total oxidant capacity by groups of workers.

4 Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity

Page 5: WorkIntensity,Low-GradeInflammation,andOxidativeStatus:A ...downloads.hindawi.com/journals/omcl/2018/2737563.pdfComparison between 8-hour and 12-hour shifts revealed significant differences

[24, 25], but it is not clear if such a strategy is of muchhelp [26], especially if the working conditions otherwiseremain unchanged.

Notably, sensitive biomarkers identified these effects,pointing to early development of an imbalance in the redoxsystem. Nevertheless, there were no changes in MDA, oneof the end products of lipid peroxidation, MDA-LDL IgM,a biomarker for immune activation, MPO, uric acid, andgalectin-3. Although the significant differences seen betweenoccupational groups were fluctuations within “normal”ranges, it must be kept in mind that individuals may beexposed to these changes throughout their working lives.Such mild chronic stress responses over prolonged timeperiods are in line with our results and were also reportedin an animal experiment with increased oxidative stress and

consumption of antioxidants, especially in the pancreas. Thisled to systemic inflammation and contributed to degenera-tive diseases [27].

It was striking that overtime was accompanied by analmost threefold increase of ACTH and a significant decreasein BDNF in laborers only (Table 2), pointing to a combinedimpact of a heavy workload and 12 h shift.

Overtime, shift work [23] and extended exposure tooccupational and environmental stressors diminish antioxi-dative capacity, which may elevate the impact of increasedproduction of OS due to a heavy workload [28, 29]. Walkeret al. [30] reported that inflammation and alterations of theimmune system were associated with altered mood andreduced well-being, thus highlighting the need for improvedrisk management in the workplace.

Table 2: Comparison of stress and inflammatory biomarkers between 8 and 12 h shifts in office and heavy workers.

Office workers (n = 26) Heavy workers (n = 8)After 8 hoursMean (95% CI)

After 12 hoursMean (95% CI)

pAfter 8 hour

Mean (95% CI)After 12 hourMean (95% CI)

p

hsCRP, mg/L 1.23 (0.89–1.71) 1.08 (0.82–1.43) 0.311 0.98 (0.54–1.79) 0.84 (0.50–1.39) 0.482

IL-6, pg/mL 1.89 (1.57–2.28) 1.71 (1.51–1.93) 0.350 1.79 (1.27–2.53) 1.97 (1.57–2.46) 0.641

Total antioxidant capacity,mmol/L

1.03 (0.81–1.25) 1.20 (0.94–1.46) 0.236 1.26 (0.91–1.61) 0.98 (0.56–1.40) 0.220

Total oxidant capacity, mmol/L 0.10 (0.07–0.16) 0.10 (0.07–0.15) 0.786 0.05 (0.02–0.10) 0.07 (0.03–0.14) 0.110

Endogenous peroxidaseactivity, U/L

6.54 (5.12–8.36) 7.23 (6.21–8.43) 0.434 8.00 (5.40–11.86) 8.00 (6.26–10.23) 0.998

Malondialdehyde, μmol/L 0.72 (0.64–0.80) 0.75 (0.65–0.86) 0.610 0.79 (0.64–0.96) 0.76 (0.59–0.98) 0.857

Myeloperoxidase, μmol/L 65.9 (55.0–78.8) 67.5 (59.0–77.4) 0.812 64.5 (46.4–89.7) 56.3 (43.9–72.2) 0.488

Paraoxonase, ng/mL 14.6 (13.1–16.2) 14.2 (12.9–15.5) 0.441 12.7 (10.4–15.4) 11.5 (9.8–13.6) 0.171

ACTH, pg/mL 12.2 (7.7–19.4) 13.6 (10.3–18.0) 0.510 8.8 (3.8–20.5) 24.9 (15.0–41.4) 0.001

BDNF, pg/mL 24030 (21661–26658) 22941 (20777–25330) 0.479 24634 (20370–29790) 17921 (14947–21485) 0.012

p values from linear contrasts after analysis of variance with body mass index included as a covariate.

Table 3: Spearman correlation coefficients between stress and inflammation biomarkers.

TAC TOC EPA PolyphenolsOfficeworkers(n = 27)

Heavyworkers(n = 52)

Officeworkers(n = 27)

Heavyworkers(n = 52)

Officeworkers(n = 27)

Heavyworkers(n = 52)

Officeworkers(n = 27)

Heavyworkers(n = 52)

hsCRP −0.181 0.217 0.612∗∗∗ 0.493∗∗∗ 0.172 −0.074 −0.132 0.290∗

IL-6 −0.219 0.167 0.462∗ 0.168 0.228 −0.069 −0.098 0.033

Uric acid 0.506∗∗ 0.516∗∗∗ −0.105 −0.001 −0.343 −0.069 −0.083 0.218

TAC −0.526∗∗ −0.058 −0.648∗∗∗ −0.633∗∗∗ −0.164 0.075

TOC −0.526∗∗ −0.058 0.184 −0.196 0.123 0.565∗∗∗

EPA −0.648∗∗∗ −0.633∗∗∗ 0.184 −0.196 −0.160 −0.292∗

Polyphenols −0.164 0.075 0.123 0.565∗∗∗ −0.160 −0.292∗

MPO 0.177 0.152 0.075 0.010 −0.093 −0.097 −0.050 −0.112Paraoxonase 0.206 0.075 0.106 −0.154 −0.249 −0.221 0.040 −0.016ACTH −0.042 0.059 −0.026 −0.096 −0.014 −0.031 0.129 −0.069BDNF −0.001 0.048 0.121 −0.003 −0.014 −0.072 0.296 0.007∗p < 0 05, ∗∗p < 0 01, and ∗∗∗p < 0 001. hsCRP = high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; IL-6 = interleukin-6; TAC = total antioxidant capacity; TOC= totaloxidant capacity; EPA = endogenous peroxidase activity; MPO=myeloperoxidase; ACTH= adrenocorticotropic hormone; BDNF = brain-derivedneurotrophic factor.

5Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity

Page 6: WorkIntensity,Low-GradeInflammation,andOxidativeStatus:A ...downloads.hindawi.com/journals/omcl/2018/2737563.pdfComparison between 8-hour and 12-hour shifts revealed significant differences

We observed a significant correlation between the totalantioxidant capacity and uric acid, as has been reported pre-viously [18]. There is also a strong inverse correlationbetween endogenous peroxidase activity and total antioxi-dant capacity. The correlation between (hsCRP) and oxida-tive stress (TOC) underlines the link between inflammationand cellular stress responses (Table 3).

Monitoring with sensitive biomarkers may be advisable,particularly in cases of smoking, obesity, and older age, tocounteract an accumulation of stress-related biologicalchanges that couldhave adversehealth effects. Researchofoxi-dative stress under real-life working conditions is a win-winsituation for both employers and employees. It could help totailorhealth care andcounseling forworkers,minimizing sick-ness absenteeism and reducing fluctuation in the workforce.

The small number of manual laborers doing a 12-hourwork shift could be a limitation for this study due to insuffi-cient compliance. In addition, the lack of female subjects is aconstraint of this work. Therefore, further research in theseworking groups with a larger collective, including femaleworkers, should be performed.

In conclusion, we found increased oxidative stress andinflammation in manual laborers as compared to officeworkers. Indications of psychological stress were observedfor overtime work in combination with hard physical work.The relationship between antioxidant consumption, oxida-tive stress, and inflammation was clearly shown in the corre-lation analysis. These data provide a solid basis for furtherresearch on this important subject with a larger collective.

Abbreviations

ROS: Reactive oxygen speciesOS: Oxidative stressOSI: Oxidative stress indexTAC: Total antioxidant capacityTOC: Total oxidant capacityEPA: Endogenous peroxidase activityMDA: MalondialdehydeMPO: MyeloperoxidasePPm: Total polyphenolsACTH: Adrenocorticotropic hormonehsCRP: High-sensitivity c-reactive proteinIL-6: Interleukin-6BDNF: Brain-derived neurotrophic factorSD: Standard deviationIQR: Interquartile range95% CI: 95% confidence intervalIQRs: Interquartile rangesCV: Coefficient of variationICC: Intraclass correlation coefficientBMI: Body mass index.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare they have no competing interests thatmight be perceived to influence the results and discussionreported in this article—except W. Wonisch, who is a mem-ber of Omnignostica Ltd.

Authors’ Contributions

Sieglinde Zelzer and Franz Tatzber contributed equally tothis study.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the scientific advice andsupport of G. Reibnegger and S. Holasek. Language editingwas done by Eugenia Lamont. This work is dedicated to mydaughter Marion Zelzer (S. Z.)

References

[1] M. Breitenbach and P. Eckl, “Introduction to oxidative stressin biomedical and biological research,” Biomolecules, vol. 5,no. 2, pp. 1169–1177, 2015.

[2] B. Halliwell, “Free radicals, reactive oxygen species and humandisease: a critical evaluation with special reference to athero-sclerosis,” British Journal of Experimental Pathology, vol. 70,no. 6, pp. 737–757, 1989.

[3] S. E. Johnstone and S. B. Baylin, “Stress and the epigeneticlandscape: a link to the pathobiology of human diseases?,”Nature Reviews Genetics, vol. 11, no. 11, pp. 806–812, 2010.

[4] H. N. Siti, Y. Kamisah, and J. Kamsiah, “The role of oxidativestress, antioxidants and vascular inflammation in cardiovascu-lar disease (a review),” Vascular Pharmacology, vol. 71, pp. 40–56, 2015.

[5] N. S. Dhalla, R. M. Temsah, and T. Netticadan, “Role of oxida-tive stress in cardiovascular diseases,” Journal of Hypertension,vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 655–673, 2000.

[6] G. Schippinger, W. Wonisch, P. M. Abuja, F. Fankhauser,B. M.Winklhofer-Roob, and G. Halwachs, “Lipid peroxidationand antioxidant status in professional American footballplayers during competition,” European Journal of ClinicalInvestigation, vol. 32, no. 9, pp. 686–692, 2002.

[7] G. Schippinger, F. Fankhauser, P. M. Abuja et al., “Competitiveand seasonal oxidative stress in elite alpine ski racers,” Scandi-navian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, vol. 19, no. 2,pp. 206–212, 2009.

[8] M. Antoncic-Svetina, D. Sentija, A. Cipak et al., “Ergometryinduces systemic oxidative stress in healthy human subjects,”The Tohoku Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 221,no. 1, pp. 43–48, 2010.

[9] H. Mangge, K. Becker, D. Fuchs, and J. M. Gostner,“Antioxidants, inflammation and cardiovascular disease,”World Journal of Cardiology, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 462–477, 2014.

[10] S. Hekimi, J. Lapointe, and Y. Wen, “Taking a “good” look atfree radicals in the aging process,” Trends in Cell Biology,vol. 21, no. 10, pp. 569–576, 2011.

[11] A. J. P. O. de Almeida, T. P. Ribeiro, and I. A. de Medeiros,“Aging: molecular pathways and implications on the cardio-vascular system,” Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity,vol. 2017, Article ID 7941563, 19 pages, 2017.

[12] C. U. D. Stenfors, I. H. Jonsdottir, L. L. Magnusson Hanson,and T. Theorell, “Associations between systemic pro-inflammatory markers, cognitive function and cognitivecomplaints in a population-based sample of working adults,”Journal of Psychosomatic Research, vol. 96, pp. 49–59, 2017.

[13] T. Ulas, H. Buyukhatipoglu, I. Kirhan et al., “Evaluation of oxi-dative stress parameters and metabolic activities of nurses

6 Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity

Page 7: WorkIntensity,Low-GradeInflammation,andOxidativeStatus:A ...downloads.hindawi.com/journals/omcl/2018/2737563.pdfComparison between 8-hour and 12-hour shifts revealed significant differences

working day and night shifts,” Revista da Escola de Enferma-gem da USP, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 471–476, 2013.

[14] C. M. Corradi-Webster and A. M. P. Carvalho, “Dialogues inpsychology and nursing in a time of shifting paradigms,”Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP, vol. 45, no. 4,pp. 974–980, 2011.

[15] S. Zelzer, R. Oberreither, C. Bernecker, I. Stelzer,M. Truschnig-Wilders, and G. Fauler, “Measurement of totaland free malondialdehyde by gas–chromatography mass spec-trometry – comparison with high-performance liquid chroma-tography methology,” Free Radical Research, vol. 47, no. 8,pp. 651–656, 2013.

[16] F. Tatzber, S. Griebenow, W. Wonisch, and R. Winkler, “Dualmethod for the determination of peroxidase activity and totalperoxides-iodide leads to a significant increase of peroxidaseactivity in human sera,” Analytical Biochemistry, vol. 316,no. 2, pp. 147–153, 2003.

[17] F. Tatzber, E. Pursch, U. Resch et al., “Cultivation and immor-talization of human B-cells producing a human monoclonalIgM antibody binding to MDA-LDL: further evidence for for-mation of atherogenic MDA-LDL adducts in humans in vivo,”Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, vol. 2017, ArticleID 6047142, 7 pages, 2017.

[18] W. Wonisch, A. Falk, I. Sundl, B. M. Winklhofer-Roob, andM. Lindschinger, “Oxidative stress increases continuously withBMI and age with unfavourable profiles in males,” The AgingMale, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 159–165, 2012.

[19] P. Sutkowy, B. Augustynska, A. Wozniak, and A. Rakowski,“Physical exercise combined with whole-body cryotherapy inevaluating the level of lipid peroxidation products and otheroxidant stress indicators in kayakers,” Oxidative Medicineand Cellular Longevity, vol. 2014, Article ID 402631, 7 pages,2014.

[20] A. E. Carrillo and A. D. Flouris, “Caloric restriction and lon-gevity: effects of reduced body temperature,” Ageing ResearchReviews, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 153–162, 2011.

[21] C. Nagata, T. Tamura, K. Wada et al., “Sleep duration, night-shift work, and the timing of meals and urinary levels of 8-isoprostane and 6-sulfatoxymelatonin in Japanese women,”Chronobiology International, vol. 34, no. 9, pp. 1187–1196,2017.

[22] S. L. Ramey, N. R. Downing, W. D. Franke, Y. Perkhounkova,and M. H. Alasagheirin, “Relationships among stress mea-sures, risk factors, and inflammatory biomarkers in lawenforcement officers,” Biological Research for Nursing,vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 16–26, 2012.

[23] C. J. Huang, H. E. Webb, M. C. Zourdos, and E. O. Acevedo,“Cardiovascular reactivity, stress, and physical activity,” Fron-tiers in Physiology, vol. 4, p. 314, 2013.

[24] A. Sharifian, S. Farahani, P. Pasalar, M. Gharavi, andO. Aminian, “Shift work as an oxidative stressor,” Journal ofCircadian Rhythms, vol. 3, p. 15, 2005.

[25] S. D. Flanagan, W. H. DuPont, L. K. Caldwell et al., “Theeffects of a Korean ginseng, GINST15, on hypo-pituitary-adrenal and oxidative activity induced by intense work stress,”Journal of Medicinal Food, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 104–112, 2018.

[26] H. Mangge, K. L. Summers, A. Meinitzer et al., “Obesity-related dysregulation of the tryptophan–kynurenine metabo-lism: role of age and parameters of the metabolic syndrome,”Obesity, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 195–201, 2014.

[27] A. L. López-López, H. B. Jaime, M. C. Escobar Villanueva,M. B. Padilla, G. V. Palacios, and F. J. A. Aguilar, “Chronicunpredictable mild stress generates oxidative stress and sys-temic inflammation in rats,” Physiology & Behavior, vol. 161,pp. 15–23, 2016.

[28] Z. Zimet, M. Bilban, M. Marc Malovrh et al., “8-Isoprostane asoxidative stress marker in coal mine workers,” Biomedical andEnvironmental Sciences, vol. 29, no. 8, pp. 589–593, 2016.

[29] T. S. Lin, C. C. Wu, J. D. Wu, and C. H. Wei, “Oxidative DNAdamage estimated by urinary 8-hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosineand arsenic in glass production workers,” Toxicology andIndustrial Health, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 513–521, 2012.

[30] A. Walker, A. McKune, S. Ferguson, D. B. Pyne, andB. Rattray, “Chronic occupational exposures can influencethe rate of PTSD and depressive disorders in first respondersand military personnel,” Extreme Physiology & Medicine,vol. 5, no. 1, p. 8, 2016.

7Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity

Page 8: WorkIntensity,Low-GradeInflammation,andOxidativeStatus:A ...downloads.hindawi.com/journals/omcl/2018/2737563.pdfComparison between 8-hour and 12-hour shifts revealed significant differences

Stem Cells International

Hindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018

Hindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018

MEDIATORSINFLAMMATION

of

EndocrinologyInternational Journal of

Hindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018

Hindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018

Disease Markers

Hindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018

BioMed Research International

OncologyJournal of

Hindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2013

Hindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018

Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity

Hindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018

PPAR Research

Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2013Hindawiwww.hindawi.com

The Scientific World Journal

Volume 2018

Immunology ResearchHindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018

Journal of

ObesityJournal of

Hindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018

Hindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018

Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine

Hindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018

Behavioural Neurology

OphthalmologyJournal of

Hindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018

Diabetes ResearchJournal of

Hindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018

Hindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018

Research and TreatmentAIDS

Hindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018

Gastroenterology Research and Practice

Hindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018

Parkinson’s Disease

Evidence-Based Complementary andAlternative Medicine

Volume 2018Hindawiwww.hindawi.com

Submit your manuscripts atwww.hindawi.com


Recommended