+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Workplace Safety and Insurance Board | Commission de la sécurité professionnelle et de lassurance...

Workplace Safety and Insurance Board | Commission de la sécurité professionnelle et de lassurance...

Date post: 28-Mar-2015
Category:
Upload: alexa-murray
View: 212 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
35
Workplace Safety and Insurance Board | Commission de la sécurité professionnelle et de l’assurance contre les accidents du travail 1 2012 Safety Groups – Advantage Program Tom Welton March 30, 2012 Introduction to Auditing
Transcript
Page 1: Workplace Safety and Insurance Board | Commission de la sécurité professionnelle et de lassurance contre les accidents du travail 1 2012 Safety Groups.

Workplace Safety and Insurance Board | Commission de la sécurité professionnelle et de l’assurance contre les accidents du travail 1

2012 Safety Groups – Advantage Program

Tom WeltonMarch 30, 2012

Introduction to Auditing

Page 2: Workplace Safety and Insurance Board | Commission de la sécurité professionnelle et de lassurance contre les accidents du travail 1 2012 Safety Groups.

Workplace Safety and Insurance Board | Commission de la sécurité professionnelle et de l’assurance contre les accidents du travail 2

Overview

■ Objective■ The Basics

– Principles of Auditing

■ Audit Process– Preparation & Initiation– Document Review– Evidence– Findings

■ Management– Management Review– Action Plan

■ Case Study

2012Safety GroupsIntroductionTo Auditing

Page 3: Workplace Safety and Insurance Board | Commission de la sécurité professionnelle et de lassurance contre les accidents du travail 1 2012 Safety Groups.

Workplace Safety and Insurance Board | Commission de la sécurité professionnelle et de l’assurance contre les accidents du travail 3

■ To provide you an introduction to the basic process of conducting an audit of your Health and Safety Management System.

Objective

Page 4: Workplace Safety and Insurance Board | Commission de la sécurité professionnelle et de lassurance contre les accidents du travail 1 2012 Safety Groups.

Workplace Safety and Insurance Board | Commission de la sécurité professionnelle et de l’assurance contre les accidents du travail 4

■ Health and Safety Management System (HSMS)– The documented process that fully incorporates

effective risk management principles into a health and safety program.

What is a HSMS?The Basics

Page 5: Workplace Safety and Insurance Board | Commission de la sécurité professionnelle et de lassurance contre les accidents du travail 1 2012 Safety Groups.

Workplace Safety and Insurance Board | Commission de la sécurité professionnelle et de l’assurance contre les accidents du travail 5

■ The systematic, independent and documented process for obtaining audit evidence and evaluating it objectively to determine the extent to which audit criteria are fulfilled

What is auditing?The Basics

Page 6: Workplace Safety and Insurance Board | Commission de la sécurité professionnelle et de lassurance contre les accidents du travail 1 2012 Safety Groups.

Workplace Safety and Insurance Board | Commission de la sécurité professionnelle et de l’assurance contre les accidents du travail 6

■ Workwell Audits■ Compliance Audits (against legal requirements)■ Combined Audits (for example, H&S and Environment)■ Risk Audits/Risk Assessments■ Workplace Inspections■ Pre-start-up Inspections■ Subject Specific – for example:

– RTW Self-Assessment– Confined Space Audit/Assessment– Emergency Preparedness & Response Audit

■ Second party audits (for example, customers or suppliers)

Other AuditsThe Basics

Page 7: Workplace Safety and Insurance Board | Commission de la sécurité professionnelle et de lassurance contre les accidents du travail 1 2012 Safety Groups.

Workplace Safety and Insurance Board | Commission de la sécurité professionnelle et de l’assurance contre les accidents du travail 7

■ To provide Owner/Senior Management with objective information on which they can react to improve their health and safety activities

Why audit?The Basics

Page 8: Workplace Safety and Insurance Board | Commission de la sécurité professionnelle et de lassurance contre les accidents du travail 1 2012 Safety Groups.

Workplace Safety and Insurance Board | Commission de la sécurité professionnelle et de l’assurance contre les accidents du travail 8

■ Conformity– Conformity is the fulfillment of the audit criteria which

includes requirements of an audit standard, the workplace’s health and safety policies, practices, procedures and related documentation.

■ Nonconformity– Nonconformity is the non-fulfillment of, or deviation

from, the requirements. It is categorized as Major and Minor.

DefinitionsThe Basics

Page 9: Workplace Safety and Insurance Board | Commission de la sécurité professionnelle et de lassurance contre les accidents du travail 1 2012 Safety Groups.

Workplace Safety and Insurance Board | Commission de la sécurité professionnelle et de l’assurance contre les accidents du travail 9

5 Steps to Managing Health & Safety

■ The 5 steps apply to the Advantage Program requirements

■ The 5 steps apply to each element of the HSMS Review and must be documented/recorded for each

The Basics

Page 10: Workplace Safety and Insurance Board | Commission de la sécurité professionnelle et de lassurance contre les accidents du travail 1 2012 Safety Groups.

Workplace Safety and Insurance Board | Commission de la sécurité professionnelle et de l’assurance contre les accidents du travail 10

■ Audit Scope– Extent and boundaries of an audit

Note: The audit scope generally includes a description of the physical locations, organizational units, activities and processes, as well as the time period covered.

■ Audit Criteria– Audit criteria are used as a reference against which audit

evidence is measured. In the WSIB Advantage Program the criteria includes; the requirements documented in the HSMS Review Form and the firm’s health and safety program, policies, procedures and related documents.

Principles of AuditingThe Basics

Page 11: Workplace Safety and Insurance Board | Commission de la sécurité professionnelle et de lassurance contre les accidents du travail 1 2012 Safety Groups.

Workplace Safety and Insurance Board | Commission de la sécurité professionnelle et de l’assurance contre les accidents du travail 11

■ Audit Evidence– Records, statements of fact or other information,

which are relevant to the audit criteria and verifiable. (minimum two different sources of evidence).

■ Audit Findings/Conclusions– Results of the evaluation of the collected audit

evidence against audit criteria.

Note: The audit findings can indicate either conformity or nonconformity with audit criteria.

Auditing relies on these principles to make it effective and reliable.

Principles of Auditing (cont’d)The Basics

Page 12: Workplace Safety and Insurance Board | Commission de la sécurité professionnelle et de lassurance contre les accidents du travail 1 2012 Safety Groups.

Workplace Safety and Insurance Board | Commission de la sécurité professionnelle et de l’assurance contre les accidents du travail 12

Key Concepts

What is Auditing■ The systematic, independent and documented process

for obtaining audit evidence and evaluating it objectively against established audit criteria

Why Audit■ To provide Owner/Senior Management with information

on which they can react to improve their health and safety activities

The Basics

Page 13: Workplace Safety and Insurance Board | Commission de la sécurité professionnelle et de lassurance contre les accidents du travail 1 2012 Safety Groups.

Workplace Safety and Insurance Board | Commission de la sécurité professionnelle et de l’assurance contre les accidents du travail 13

Key Concepts

Auditing Principles■ Scope – extend and boundaries of an audit■ Criteria – a set of established requirements the audit

evidence is evaluated against. The criteria for Advantage firms is - HSMS Review Form and the firm’s H&S program, policies, procedures and other related documents.

■ Evidence – records, statements of fact or other information, which are relevant to the audit criteria and verifiable (minimum two sources of information)

■ Findings – evidence compared to criteria

The Basics

Page 14: Workplace Safety and Insurance Board | Commission de la sécurité professionnelle et de lassurance contre les accidents du travail 1 2012 Safety Groups.

Workplace Safety and Insurance Board | Commission de la sécurité professionnelle et de l’assurance contre les accidents du travail 14

Key Concepts

■ An audit is conducted in a systematic manner and requires preparation

■ Document Review collects information to help determine if the audit criteria are being met by the firm

Audit Process

Page 15: Workplace Safety and Insurance Board | Commission de la sécurité professionnelle et de lassurance contre les accidents du travail 1 2012 Safety Groups.

Workplace Safety and Insurance Board | Commission de la sécurité professionnelle et de l’assurance contre les accidents du travail 15

Key Concepts

■ There are multiple sources of evidence: documents, records, interviews and observations– Auditor(s) need sufficient information before it is considered

evidence– Recorded evidence is evaluated against established audit

criteria to determine objective audit findings– Finding of conformity or nonconformity (major or minor)

■ Nonconformities are situations where a requirement clearly has not been fulfilled with evidence based on objective facts

Audit Process

Page 16: Workplace Safety and Insurance Board | Commission de la sécurité professionnelle et de lassurance contre les accidents du travail 1 2012 Safety Groups.

Workplace Safety and Insurance Board | Commission de la sécurité professionnelle et de l’assurance contre les accidents du travail 16

Key Concepts

■ The audit report can be recorded on the HSMS Review Form

■ Other styles of audit reports can be used, as long as they include all nonconformities found and relate it to the criteria requirements

■ Report any commendable HSMS findings■ Management Review can be formal or informal■ Owner/Senior Management must understand and agree

to the audit findings/conclusions. Any diverging opinions are recorded if not resolved.

Management

Page 17: Workplace Safety and Insurance Board | Commission de la sécurité professionnelle et de lassurance contre les accidents du travail 1 2012 Safety Groups.

Workplace Safety and Insurance Board | Commission de la sécurité professionnelle et de l’assurance contre les accidents du travail 17

Key Concepts

■ All nonconformities are included and initiated in the action plan

■ Conformities can be included in the action plan for continual improvement

■ Resolving nonconformities and verifying they are resolved are done after audit activities

Management

Page 18: Workplace Safety and Insurance Board | Commission de la sécurité professionnelle et de lassurance contre les accidents du travail 1 2012 Safety Groups.

Workplace Safety and Insurance Board | Commission de la sécurité professionnelle et de l’assurance contre les accidents du travail 18

The Audit Process

INITIATING

CONDUCT THE AUDIT

AUDIT REPORTMANAGEMENT REVIEW

ACTION PLAN

Document Review

Evidence

Findings

The Basics

Page 19: Workplace Safety and Insurance Board | Commission de la sécurité professionnelle et de lassurance contre les accidents du travail 1 2012 Safety Groups.

Workplace Safety and Insurance Board | Commission de la sécurité professionnelle et de l’assurance contre les accidents du travail 19

■ Management assigns the qualified auditor(s)■ Develop an audit plan which includes:

– Objectives, Scope, Criteria, Schedule■ Resources:

– Time – Audit support (team)– Health and Safety Equipment (PPE)– Floor Plan, Equipment List, Work room– Audit working documents (audit notes/sketches/interview

notes etc.)■ Communicate the audit activity to appropriate workplace

parties

Initiate and PrepareAudit Process: Initiate

Page 20: Workplace Safety and Insurance Board | Commission de la sécurité professionnelle et de lassurance contre les accidents du travail 1 2012 Safety Groups.

Workplace Safety and Insurance Board | Commission de la sécurité professionnelle et de l’assurance contre les accidents du travail 20

Documents and Records■ A document may be a policy, a procedure, a work

instruction, a form, or other written information, that generally gives direction.

■ A document is current, active and changeable.■ A record is dated, historical, and unchangeable.

(An obsolete document may become a record).

Document Review Audit Process: Conduct the Audit

Page 21: Workplace Safety and Insurance Board | Commission de la sécurité professionnelle et de lassurance contre les accidents du travail 1 2012 Safety Groups.

Workplace Safety and Insurance Board | Commission de la sécurité professionnelle et de l’assurance contre les accidents du travail 21

■ First step in Conducting the Audit■ Establishes initial conformity to the audit criteria■ Determines other types of evidence the auditor(s) will

sample

Document Review Audit Process: Conduct the Audit

Page 22: Workplace Safety and Insurance Board | Commission de la sécurité professionnelle et de lassurance contre les accidents du travail 1 2012 Safety Groups.

Workplace Safety and Insurance Board | Commission de la sécurité professionnelle et de l’assurance contre les accidents du travail 22

Policy

System Procedures

Operating Procedures

Work Instructions

Forms, checklists, templates, & other “data collection” documents

RECORDS

Level 2 Docs5W’s & H of system

Typically addresses eachWSIB HSMS Requirement“Big Picture” (may be organized by “processes”)

Document Review

Level 1 DocsWhat? (some why?)

H&S Policy Statement

H&S Policy Manual (optional)

Level 3 Docs - more details of 5W’s & H

Level 4 Docs detailed How

Typically organized bydepartment

Task SpecificInstructions

Audit Process: Conduct the Audit

Page 23: Workplace Safety and Insurance Board | Commission de la sécurité professionnelle et de lassurance contre les accidents du travail 1 2012 Safety Groups.

Workplace Safety and Insurance Board | Commission de la sécurité professionnelle et de l’assurance contre les accidents du travail 23

■ Auditor(s) look for evidence that demonstrates requirements have been met.

The sources of information gathered are grouped into these categories:– Documents verify relevant, clear and complete procedures, work

instructions, guidelines, etc., are readily accessible– Records: verify appropriate records have been kept to

demonstrate that requirements of procedures and the standard have been met

– Observations: verify activities, workplace conditions, controls are in place

– Interviews: verify health and safety system/program understanding.

Audit Evidence Audit Process: Conduct the Audit

Page 24: Workplace Safety and Insurance Board | Commission de la sécurité professionnelle et de lassurance contre les accidents du travail 1 2012 Safety Groups.

Workplace Safety and Insurance Board | Commission de la sécurité professionnelle et de l’assurance contre les accidents du travail 24

■ If all available sources of information (minimum 2) are consistent then the information may be considered evidence of conformity. Inconsistent information is evidence of nonconformity.

■ Evidence is measured against the audit criteria to determine conformity or nonconformity

Audit Evidence Audit Process: Conduct the Audit

Page 25: Workplace Safety and Insurance Board | Commission de la sécurité professionnelle et de lassurance contre les accidents du travail 1 2012 Safety Groups.

Workplace Safety and Insurance Board | Commission de la sécurité professionnelle et de l’assurance contre les accidents du travail 25

Collecting and Verifying Information:■ Review Documents and Records

– Note details of documents and records reviewed■ Observations while at the facility and throughout the audit

– Note relevant observations that demonstrate conformity and nonconformity

■ Interviews during the facility tour and throughout the audit– Conduct interviews appropriate to the situation and the

person– Interview people from appropriate levels and functions– Make notes of evidence of conformity and nonconformity– Summarize the results of the interview with the person

Audit EvidenceAudit Process: Conduct the Audit

Page 26: Workplace Safety and Insurance Board | Commission de la sécurité professionnelle et de lassurance contre les accidents du travail 1 2012 Safety Groups.

Workplace Safety and Insurance Board | Commission de la sécurité professionnelle et de l’assurance contre les accidents du travail 26

Collecting and Verifying Information:■ How much is enough?

– Sufficient to demonstrate a consistent pattern of conformance

– One piece might be enough, for example:• maybe only one incident occurred so there will be only

one investigation report• observed one failure to use confined space procedure;• only one work instruction

– Perhaps 10 to 50 pieces may be appropriate, for example:• monthly workplace inspections• pre-shift forklift inspections

Audit EvidenceAudit Process: Conduct the Audit

Page 27: Workplace Safety and Insurance Board | Commission de la sécurité professionnelle et de lassurance contre les accidents du travail 1 2012 Safety Groups.

Workplace Safety and Insurance Board | Commission de la sécurité professionnelle et de l’assurance contre les accidents du travail 27

Generating Audit Findings/Conclusions:■ Evaluate all audit evidence against audit criteria■ During the audit, evidence must be presented that the

criteria are in place for conformity. If any requirement is not met, a nonconformity is noted.

■ Audit findings/conclusions indicate conformity or nonconformity to criteria

Note: Any corrective actions to a nonconformity does not change the audit finding/conclusion.

Audit FindingsAudit Process: Findings

Page 28: Workplace Safety and Insurance Board | Commission de la sécurité professionnelle et de lassurance contre les accidents du travail 1 2012 Safety Groups.

Workplace Safety and Insurance Board | Commission de la sécurité professionnelle et de l’assurance contre les accidents du travail 28

Conformity■ Conformity is the fulfillment of the audit criteria which

includes requirements of an audit standard, the workplace’s health and safety policies, practices, procedures and related documentation.

Nonconformity■ Nonconformity is the non-fulfillment of, or deviation from,

the requirements. It is categorized as Major and Minor.

Audit ConclusionAudit Process: Findings

Page 29: Workplace Safety and Insurance Board | Commission de la sécurité professionnelle et de lassurance contre les accidents du travail 1 2012 Safety Groups.

Workplace Safety and Insurance Board | Commission de la sécurité professionnelle et de l’assurance contre les accidents du travail 29

MAJOR nonconformities:■ the issue will continue to occur because of how the HSMS and

health and safety program are structured ■ there is unacceptable risk to a worker’s health or safety■ there are serious legal implications, or■ there is an accumulation of related minor nonconformities.

MINOR nonconformities:■ the HSMS and the health and safety program structures are valid,

but there was minor deviation (e.g. human error)■ there is no unacceptable risk to the worker ■ there are no significant legal implications, and■ there is not an accumulation of related minor nonconformities.

Audit ConclusionsAudit Process: Findings

Page 30: Workplace Safety and Insurance Board | Commission de la sécurité professionnelle et de lassurance contre les accidents du travail 1 2012 Safety Groups.

Workplace Safety and Insurance Board | Commission de la sécurité professionnelle et de l’assurance contre les accidents du travail 30

■ The report must reference the requirement (i.e. A.2), and the evidence that supports the findings/conclusions of conformity and nonconformity

■ Indicate any situations encountered that may decrease the reliability of the audit conclusion

■ Diverging opinions about findings and conclusions should be discussed, resolved if possible, and recorded if not resolved

■ The report must include the date(s) of the audit, report date, auditor(s) name

■ Auditor(s) prepare to present or discuss the audit with the Owner/Senior Management

Note – For Advantage the completed HSMS Review Form can be the report submitted for Management Review.

Audit Report Management: Audit Report

Page 31: Workplace Safety and Insurance Board | Commission de la sécurité professionnelle et de lassurance contre les accidents du travail 1 2012 Safety Groups.

Workplace Safety and Insurance Board | Commission de la sécurité professionnelle et de l’assurance contre les accidents du travail 31

■ Owner/Senior Management reviews the audit report■ Ensure the Owner/Senior Management agrees with and

understands the audit conclusions■ A record of the Owner/Senior Management review■ Establish a timeframe for the employer’s continual

improvement plan

Management ReviewManagement: Review

Page 32: Workplace Safety and Insurance Board | Commission de la sécurité professionnelle et de lassurance contre les accidents du travail 1 2012 Safety Groups.

Workplace Safety and Insurance Board | Commission de la sécurité professionnelle et de l’assurance contre les accidents du travail 32

As a result of the audit findings/conclusions:■ An action plan is developed for all nonconformities■ The action plan outlines how nonconformities will be

corrected, responsibilities assigned and timelines established.

■ The action plan is developed or reviewed, approved, resourced and initiated by the Owner/Senior Management.

■ The employer’s auditor(s) may conduct follow-ups to ensure the element is progressing to conformity

Note – for the Advantage Program the continual improvement plan is the action plan.

Action PlanManagement: Action Plan

Page 33: Workplace Safety and Insurance Board | Commission de la sécurité professionnelle et de lassurance contre les accidents du travail 1 2012 Safety Groups.

Workplace Safety and Insurance Board | Commission de la sécurité professionnelle et de l’assurance contre les accidents du travail 33

■ An action plan can also be used for continual improvement

■ When a criteria requirement is met, but may deteriorate into a nonconformity, the audit may indicate an opportunity to improve.

Continual Improvement■ The process of enhancing the HSMS to achieve ongoing

improvement in overall health and safety performance. ■ Improved performance on its own IS NOT continual

improvement, it is an outcome – you must improve the way you manage.

Action PlanManagement: Action Plan

Page 34: Workplace Safety and Insurance Board | Commission de la sécurité professionnelle et de lassurance contre les accidents du travail 1 2012 Safety Groups.

Workplace Safety and Insurance Board | Commission de la sécurité professionnelle et de l’assurance contre les accidents du travail 34

Year-End Submission

Year-end Report Checklist: *All Advantage firms submit the following documentation attached to the Checklist; 1 Written Standard 20% 2 Internal Auditor training record 20% 3 Completed an approved HSMS Review (internal audit) w/Senior Management sign-off

acknowledging their involvement 20%

4 Written Continual Improvement plan addressing HSMS Review w/Senior Management sign-off acknowledging their involvement

20%

5 Return to Work 20%

Page 35: Workplace Safety and Insurance Board | Commission de la sécurité professionnelle et de lassurance contre les accidents du travail 1 2012 Safety Groups.

Workplace Safety and Insurance Board | Commission de la sécurité professionnelle et de l’assurance contre les accidents du travail 35

Case Study


Recommended