Date post: | 19-May-2015 |
Category: |
Technology |
Upload: | gwp-mediterranean-gwp-med |
View: | 212 times |
Download: | 0 times |
“ Flood management in a transboundary context” Zagreb, 13 th to 14 th December 2011
FLOOD MANAGEMENT EXPERIENCES
MARTINA JANKOVICPUBLIC WATER MANAGEMNET COMPANY “SRBIJAVODE”
EXPERIENCES
IN SERBIA
MARTINA WILL TALK ABOUT :MARTINA WILL TALK ABOUT :MARTINA WILL TALK ABOUT :MARTINA WILL TALK ABOUT :
•HYDROLOGICAL SITUATION AND FLOODS IN SERBIA IN THE PERIOD FEBRUARY - MAY
2006
•CURRENT SITUATION OF OBJECT FOR PROTECTION
•FLOOD ON THE RIVER DANUBE IN APRIL •FLOOD ON THE RIVER DANUBE IN APRIL 2006: DEFENSE OF CITIES IN COASTAL
•EFFECTS OF DEFENSE CONDUCTED BY FLOOD
•EXAMPLES OF ACTIVE ROLE PWMC"SRBIJAVODE" IN ORGANIZED AND
IMPLEMENTATION OF FLOOD DEFENCE
•CONCLUSIONS
15th February 15th February 15th February 15th February ---- 15 March 200615 March 200615 March 200615 March 2006� THE EXTRAORDINARY INCREASE IN THE FLOW OF WATERWAYS IN THE EXTRAORDINARY INCREASE IN THE FLOW OF WATERWAYS IN THE EXTRAORDINARY INCREASE IN THE FLOW OF WATERWAYS IN THE EXTRAORDINARY INCREASE IN THE FLOW OF WATERWAYS IN
SERBIA IN FEBRUARY 2006 RESULT IS THE MOST UNFAVORABLE SERBIA IN FEBRUARY 2006 RESULT IS THE MOST UNFAVORABLE SERBIA IN FEBRUARY 2006 RESULT IS THE MOST UNFAVORABLE SERBIA IN FEBRUARY 2006 RESULT IS THE MOST UNFAVORABLE COINCIDENCE OF HYDROLOGICAL FACTORS ON ALMOST EVERY RIVER COINCIDENCE OF HYDROLOGICAL FACTORS ON ALMOST EVERY RIVER COINCIDENCE OF HYDROLOGICAL FACTORS ON ALMOST EVERY RIVER COINCIDENCE OF HYDROLOGICAL FACTORS ON ALMOST EVERY RIVER BASINBASINBASINBASIN
HYDROLOGICAL SITUATION AND FLOODS IN SERBIA IN THE PERIOD FEBRUARY - MAY 2006
“ Flood management in a transboundary context” Zagreb, 13 th to 14 th December 2011
COINCIDENCE OF HYDROLOGICAL FACTORS ON ALMOST EVERY RIVER COINCIDENCE OF HYDROLOGICAL FACTORS ON ALMOST EVERY RIVER COINCIDENCE OF HYDROLOGICAL FACTORS ON ALMOST EVERY RIVER COINCIDENCE OF HYDROLOGICAL FACTORS ON ALMOST EVERY RIVER BASINBASINBASINBASIN
� IN CONDITIONS OF HIGH SOIL HUMIDITY, HIGH GROUNDWATER IN CONDITIONS OF HIGH SOIL HUMIDITY, HIGH GROUNDWATER IN CONDITIONS OF HIGH SOIL HUMIDITY, HIGH GROUNDWATER IN CONDITIONS OF HIGH SOIL HUMIDITY, HIGH GROUNDWATER LEVEL, MULTILEVEL, MULTILEVEL, MULTILEVEL, MULTI----DAY RAINFALL DAY RAINFALL DAY RAINFALL DAY RAINFALL ,,,,EXTRA SATURATED THE SOIL, SO THAT EXTRA SATURATED THE SOIL, SO THAT EXTRA SATURATED THE SOIL, SO THAT EXTRA SATURATED THE SOIL, SO THAT THE RAIN TURNED INTO A RUNOFF.THE RAIN TURNED INTO A RUNOFF.THE RAIN TURNED INTO A RUNOFF.THE RAIN TURNED INTO A RUNOFF.� Defense Measures have been introduced in almost all regulated Defense Measures have been introduced in almost all regulated Defense Measures have been introduced in almost all regulated Defense Measures have been introduced in almost all regulated partspartspartsparts
� CCCCoastal flooding regulated oastal flooding regulated oastal flooding regulated oastal flooding regulated parts parts parts parts are not happenare not happenare not happenare not happen
� Flooding and damage were recorded in the coastal unregulatedFlooding and damage were recorded in the coastal unregulatedFlooding and damage were recorded in the coastal unregulatedFlooding and damage were recorded in the coastal unregulated areas areas areas areas with no possibility of drainagewith no possibility of drainagewith no possibility of drainagewith no possibility of drainage
ХИДРОЛОШКА СИТУАЦИЈА И ПОПЛАВЕ У СРБИЈИ У ХИДРОЛОШКА СИТУАЦИЈА И ПОПЛАВЕ У СРБИЈИ У ПЕРИОДУ ФЕБРУАР ПЕРИОДУ ФЕБРУАР -- МАЈ 2006МАЈ 2006FLOODED AGRICULTURAL AREA
ХИДРОЛОШКА СИТУАЦИЈА И ПОПЛАВЕ У СРБИЈИ У ХИДРОЛОШКА СИТУАЦИЈА И ПОПЛАВЕ У СРБИЈИ У ПЕРИОДУ ФЕБРУАР ПЕРИОДУ ФЕБРУАР -- МАЈ 2006МАЈ 2006
FLOOD IN REGULATED PART OF RIVER
15th March 15th March 15th March 15th March ---- 17 April 200617 April 200617 April 200617 April 2006
� After 15 March, 2006.After 15 March, 2006.After 15 March, 2006.After 15 March, 2006., , , , was recorded new increase in the flow with was recorded new increase in the flow with was recorded new increase in the flow with was recorded new increase in the flow with
the upstream parts of the Danube River Basin and the dominant the upstream parts of the Danube River Basin and the dominant the upstream parts of the Danube River Basin and the dominant the upstream parts of the Danube River Basin and the dominant
HYDROLOGICAL SITUATION AND FLOODS IN SERBIA IN THE PERIOD FEBRUARY - MAY 2006
“ Flood management in a transboundary context” Zagreb, 13 th to 14 th December 2011
the upstream parts of the Danube River Basin and the dominant the upstream parts of the Danube River Basin and the dominant the upstream parts of the Danube River Basin and the dominant the upstream parts of the Danube River Basin and the dominant
tributaries: the River Sava, Tisa, Tamis, Vtributaries: the River Sava, Tisa, Tamis, Vtributaries: the River Sava, Tisa, Tamis, Vtributaries: the River Sava, Tisa, Tamis, Velikaelikaelikaelika Morava.Morava.Morava.Morava.
� In the period from 10. to 17.In the period from 10. to 17.In the period from 10. to 17.In the period from 10. to 17.April April April April 2006, recorded the historical 2006, recorded the historical 2006, recorded the historical 2006, recorded the historical
maximum water levels on the Danube river in the area of all citiesmaximum water levels on the Danube river in the area of all citiesmaximum water levels on the Danube river in the area of all citiesmaximum water levels on the Danube river in the area of all cities
680
702
721
736
749
760
772
780 782 783779
775 772 772 771 769765
760753
743
732
718
706700
694686684
706
723
738
750
765772
777 777770 767
762 763 762758 756
750744
734
723
710
700
690
680674
684
698
715
736
760
778
790
808
831
842 845 842838
832828 828 826
822 820814
806
797
786
776772
762
744738
790 790
780 780
770 770
760
770
780
770 770
780
770
760
750 750
760
770 770 770
780 780
790 790796
810
820
850
874
890
902
920
946
960 958954
948940
937 936
920 920924
920912
904
892
880
870
860
850
842
680 680 680 680
690 690696
710
720
750
774
790
802
820
846
860 858854
848
840837 836
820 820824
820
812
804
792
780
770
760
750
742
700
800
900
1000 H [mm] Water lavel on Danube riverWater lavel on Danube river
13.03.13.03. -- 05.05.05.05.
20062006
470
490
510
522
530
538 540 540535
528522 520 520
526532
546
556
566
576
584592
602610
620
636
658
475
491
508
519525
531 534 534 533
523519
516521 521
526
537
548
558
566572
582
590596
606
620
640
660
674
594600
608614 616
622 624 624 622618 616 614
618614 614
624
634638
644648
656660
664670
655660
663668 670 670
660
670 670 670 670
660
650 650
660
670 670 670
400
500
600
13.0
3
14.0
3
15.0
3
16.0
3
17.0
3
18.0
3
19.0
3
20.0
3
21.0
3
22.0
3
23.0
3
24.0
3
25.0
3
26.0
3
27.0
3
28.0
3
29.0
3
30.0
3
31.0
3
01.0
4
02.0
4
03.0
4
04.0
4
05.0
4
06.0
4
07.0
4
08.0
4
09.0
4
10.0
4
11.0
4
12.0
4
13.0
4
14.0
4
15.0
4
16.0
4
17.0
4
18.0
4
19.0
4
20.0
4
21.0
4
22.0
4
23.0
4
24.0
4
25.0
4
26.0
4
27.0
4
28.0
4
29.0
4
30.0
4
01.0
5
02.0
5
03.0
5
T [dan]
Zemun
Pančevo
Smederevo
V.Gradište
Golubac
8 7 0
9 0 0 8 9 88 8 8
8 6 88 6 2
8 5 6
8 4 08 3 2
8 2 6
8 3 8
9 0 0
9 7 0
10 0 210 0 2
9 8 6
9 7 49 6 4 9 6 0
9 5 0
9 3 0
9 12
8 8 8
8 7 0 8 6 6
8 5 4
8 7 08 8 0 8 8 0
8 6 88 6 2
8 7 0
8 8 68 9 2
8 8 68 7 8
8 6 6 8 6 2
8 9 2
9 2 0
9 3 49 2 8
9 16
8 9 2
8 7 0
8 3 0
8 0 4
7 8 87 8 0
7 9 8
8 12
8 3 6
688
702
713
725
734 737 737 734730
726 726 725 724720
715706
6977 0 0
8 0 0
9 0 0
10 0 0
110 0 H [mm]
Jamena
S.Mitrovica
Šabac
Beograd
Water lavel on Sava riverWater lavel on Sava river
13.03.13.03. -- 05.05.05.05.
20062006
5 5 0
5 9 0 5 9 0
5 7 85 7 0
5 6 5 5 6 65 5 8 5 5 5
5 5 05 5 6
5 9 1
6 4 3
6 6 26 6 8
6 5 8 6 5 46 4 9 6 4 9
6 4 2
6 2 86 18
6 0 25 9 2 5 8 8
5 7 85 8 4
5 9 2 5 9 6 5 9 4 5 9 2 5 9 4
6 0 66 15 6 14 6 12
6 0 4 6 0 06 0 9
6 2 6
6 3 9 6 3 5 6 3 3
6 19
6 0 6
5 8 4
5 7 05 6 0
5 5 2 5 5 2 5 5 55 6 6
4 0 9
4 4 64 5 2
4 4 14 3 4 4 3 2 4 3 4
4 2 8 4 2 44 18 4 2 2
4 5 3
4 9 3
5 0 95 14 5 11 5 0 7 5 0 4 5 0 5 5 0 2
4 9 24 8 6
4 7 34 6 5
4 6 0 4 5 6 4 6 04 6 6
4 7 5 4 7 5 4 7 54 8 0
4 8 84 9 6 4 9 8 4 9 7 4 9 3 4 9 0 4 9 5
5 0 55 13 5 13 5 11
5 0 24 9 1
4 7 6
4 6 44 5 5
4 4 6 4 4 2 4 4 24 5 0
428
448
465
4 78486
492 4 95 495490
4 82478 476
480486
4 90
504
5155 23
531
541
551558
565
575
590
610
631
655
674
688 686
675
663654
645640
4 0 0
5 0 0
6 0 0
T [dan]
The level of development:The level of development:The level of development:The level of development:
� The waterways in the protected coastal area where PWMC "Srbijavode" implement flood protection are protects about 1.1 million ha of land,
numbers of sttlements, industrial object and infrastructure
� In Serbia a large number of waterways are not regulated, and present the complexes without the possibility of land drainage: these areas are unavoidablyin danger
CURRENT SITUATION OF FLOOD PROTECTION SYTEMS
in danger
ProblemsProblemsProblemsProblems::::
� Cities in the coastal region's major rivers are not protected by the degree of protection provided, with a high risk of damage due to flooding (Belgrade, Smederevo, Veliko Gradište, Golubac, Kucevo, Petrovac .....)
� A large number of protective systems not been created as a protection entity
EXISTING STATE OF PROTECTION SYSTEMS
19811981
2006 2006
PREVENTIVE MEASURES:PREVENTIVE MEASURES:PREVENTIVE MEASURES:PREVENTIVE MEASURES:
� Control of preparedness of protective systems: evidence of “weak spote”
� Control and operational preparedness observational service water management company
� Supply and filling new equipment and materials for defense
FLOOD ON THE RIVER DANUBE IN APRIL 2006: DEFENSE OF CITIES IN COASTAL
Supply and filling new equipment and materials for defense
� Establishing lines of cooperation, coordination and subordination to the services:RHMS,Directorate of Defense: Centers for informing and warning the public,headquarters for flood protection at the local level,systems: HP "Iron Gate",
� Informing the public
ORDINARY AND EXTRAORDINARY MEASURES OF DEFENCE:
� RHMS Service 4th April announce the formation of the flood wave on Danube river
� PWMC "Srbijavode" 7th April formed operational headquarters for floodThe risk of flooding announced general public and the staffs of the cities on the coast.
FLOOD ON THE RIVER DANUBE IN APRIL 2006: DEFENSE OF CITIES IN COASTAL
on the coast.
� Measures on a regular defense Sava river, Velika Morava and Danube have been introduced in mid-March.Extraordinary defense measures were introduced on the River Danube and Sava 8th April
� The state of emergency was introduced on 13th April in the most affected cities in the coastal river Danube: Golubac, Veliko Gradiste and Smederevo
BELGRADE
BELGRADE
22.03.2006
ZEMUN
10.04.06.
22.03.2006
ZEMUN10.04.06.
SMEDEREVO10.04.06.
SMEDEREVO10.04.06.
SMEDEREVO10.04.06.
VELIKO GRADISTE10.04.06.
VELIKO GRADISTE10.04.06.
VELIKO GRADISTE10.04.06.
GOLUBAC10.04.06.
GOLUBAC10.04.06.
GOLUBAC10.04.06.
GOLUBAC10.04.06.
Protection priorities:Protection priorities:Protection priorities:Protection priorities:
� Urban areas, population and the most valuable property: industrial complexes, developed agricultural areas, cultural monuments
EXAMPLES OF ACTIVE ROLE PWMC "SRBIJAVODE" IN ORGANIZED AND IMPLEMENTATION OF FLOOD DEFENCE
Responsibilities the service PWMC:Responsibilities the service PWMC:Responsibilities the service PWMC:Responsibilities the service PWMC:
� Urgent raising defensive line on the shores of all coastal cities to the announced levels, with the involvement of the available machines.
� Operational cooperation with the staffs at the local level and direct cooperation with representatives of the Department of Defense.
� Providing emergency dynamics of production and distribution of materials for defense, according to the needs of the area
BELGRADE
BELGRADE
ZEMUN
ZEMUN
Vodomer na Dunavu Smederevo "0" 65,36mnm
684
698
715
736
760
778
790
808
831842 845 842 838
832 828 828 826 822 820814
806797
786776 772
762
744738
700
800
900
1000 H [mm]
Nivo red. odb
Nivo van. odb
"700" - od 08.04.
Max "845" 16.04.06
594600
608614 616
622 624 624 622 618 616 614 618 614 614624
634 638644 648
656 660 664670
400
500
600
13.03
14.03
15.03
16.03
17.03
18.03
19.03
20.03
21.03
22.03
23.03
24.03
25.03
26.03
27.03
28.03
29.03
30.03
31.03
01.04
02.04
03.04
04.04
05.04
06.04
07.04
08.04
09.04
10.04
11.04
12.04
13.04
14.04
15.04
16.04
17.04
18.04
19.04
20.04
21.04
22.04
23.04
24.04
25.04
26.04
27.04
28.04
29.04
30.04
01.05
02.05
03.05
T [dan]
"600" - od 14.03,
SMEDEREVO
SMEDEREVO
СМЕДЕРЕВО
СМЕДЕРЕВО
SMEDEREVO
Vodomer na Dunavu V. Gradište "0" 62,17mnm
790 790
780 780
770 770
760
770
780
770 770
780
770
760
750 750
760
770 770 770
780 780
790 790796
810
820
850
874
890
902
920
946
960 958954
948940 937 936
920 920924
920912
904
892
880
870
860
850842
700
800
900
1000 H [mm]
Nivo red. odb
Nivo van. odb
"800" - od 07.04.
Max "960" 15.04.06
400
500
600
13.03
14.03
15.03
16.03
17.03
18.03
19.03
20.03
21.03
22.03
23.03
24.03
25.03
26.03
27.03
28.03
29.03
30.03
31.03
01.04
02.04
03.04
04.04
05.04
06.04
07.04
08.04
09.04
10.04
11.04
12.04
13.04
14.04
15.04
16.04
17.04
18.04
19.04
20.04
21.04
22.04
23.04
24.04
25.04
26.04
27.04
28.04
29.04
30.04
01.05
02.05
03.05
T [dan]
VELIKO GRADISTE:BEGINING OF BULDING DEFENSE LINE
VELIKO GRADISTE:FORMED DEFENSE LINE
VELIKO GRADISTE:BEGINIG OF BULDING DEFENSE LINE
VELIKO GRADISTE:FORMED DEFENSE LINE
Vodomer na DunavuGolubac
680 680 680 680
690 690696
710
720
750
774
790
802
820
846
860 858854
848840 837 836
820 820 824 820812
804
792
780
770
760
750742
700
800
900
1000 H [mm]
Nivo red. odb
Nivo van. odb
"700" - od 07.04.
655660 663
668 670 670
660
670
680
670 670
680
670
660
650 650
660
670 670 670
680 680
400
500
600
13.03
14.03
15.03
16.03
17.03
18.03
19.03
20.03
21.03
22.03
23.03
24.03
25.03
26.03
27.03
28.03
29.03
30.03
31.03
01.04
02.04
03.04
04.04
05.04
06.04
07.04
08.04
09.04
10.04
11.04
12.04
13.04
14.04
15.04
16.04
17.04
18.04
19.04
20.04
21.04
22.04
23.04
24.04
25.04
26.04
27.04
28.04
29.04
30.04
01.05
02.05
03.05
T [dan]
GOLUBAC :BRGINIG OF BULDING DEFENSE LINE
GOLUBAC :BEGINIG OF BULDING DEFENSE LINE
GOLUBAC :BEGINIG OF BULDING DEFENSE LINE
GOLUBAC :FORMED SECOND DEFENSE LINE
GOLUBAC:DEFENSE LINES
Defense of major cities in the coastal rivers Danube and Sava, has successfully implemented and achieved near maximum water levels, which were higher and up to 0.50 m of the highest recorded in 1981. , when the floods caused severe damage,
No record of temporary defensive line spilling the protective objects,
EFFECTS OF FLOOD DEFENSE IMPLEMENTED DURING FEBRUARY - MAY 2006
Formation of defensive line is made rationally, with a minimum investment
In the defense, effectively and quickly, were carried out emergency works to repair the damage to coastlines in the Velika Morava, Mlava, Pek, which are at a low investment prevented a large-scale damage.
VOLUME WORK AND IMPLEMENTED measures DEFENSEVOLUME WORK AND IMPLEMENTED measures DEFENSEVOLUME WORK AND IMPLEMENTED measures DEFENSEVOLUME WORK AND IMPLEMENTED measures DEFENSE----
DEFENSE COSTSDEFENSE COSTSDEFENSE COSTSDEFENSE COSTSTotal duration of defense: the sum of all the rivers on the territory of Serbia, a total of 513 days, of which 243 days and 270 regular emergency defense. The Danube is the defense lasted 55 days.
The total length of the defensive line on which measures are implemented and works regular and emergency defense, and emergency measures: 695 km
EFFECTS OF FLOOD DEFENSE IMPLEMENTED DURING FEBRUARY - MAY 2006
works regular and emergency defense, and emergency measures: 695 km
The length of temporary defensive line: During the flood a total of 14,900 m built temporary defensive embankment
Companies involved: 15 water management enterprises, 20 companies invited Head of defense: the operative (machinery and personnel) and significantly more by invitation of the municipal staffs
Spent material: 350,000 bags, 8000 kg foil, 17,000 m3 of sand, 40,000 m3 of soil
SMEDEREVOSMEDEREVOFIRST LINE OF DEFENSE
SMEDEREVOSECOND LINE OF DEFENSE
SMEDEREVO
ZEMUN
VELIKO GRADISTE
GOLUBAC
SMEDEREVO
SMEDEREVOSECOND LINE OF DEFENSE
VELIKO GRADISTE
VELIKO GRADISTE SECOND LINE OF DEFENSE
GOLUBAC
GOLUBAC
� Effects of Defence carried out have confirmed the reliability of protective objects built, willingness and knowledge management and operational personnel for emergency defense measures
� During the defense was operational cooperation with other vital systems of protection, as well as with local governments
� Requires significant changes in the organization of flood control in all respects:
� Flood protection must take priority in the Programme of construction,
CONCLUSIONS
� Flood protection must take priority in the Programme of construction, reconstruction and maintenance of water management facility.
� It is necessary to immediately provide the necessary resources and take action on the reconstruction and upgrade defensive line.
� These works should be carried out through a unique program of the Government of the Republic of Serbia.
� Necessary changes in the management of defense systemGiven the obvious changes in the basin of the Danube River, it is necessary to improve the systems of hydrological observations, forecasts and Announcements
� Public water management companies must have available necessary financial resources for flood
APPENDIXAPPENDIX::
COMPETITION FOR COMPETITION FOR THE BEST THE BEST PHOTOGRAPHYPHOTOGRAPHY DURING FLOOD DURING FLOOD DEFENSE DEFENSE
FloodFlood protection was difficult but succesfulprotection was difficult but succesful
Brake for participant in defenseBrake for participant in defense
Water level has reached historical levelWater level has reached historical level
Water level will not riseWater level will not rise??????????
Flood defense was risky but under control
PANIC IN FLOOD ZONE!
Can we be sure that we did all that is necessary?Can we be sure that we did all that is necessary?
TAKE BREATH BEFORE NEXT FLOOD!TAKE BREATH BEFORE NEXT FLOOD!
Thank you for your kind Thank you for your kind attention!attention!
“ Flood management in a transboundary context” Zagreb, 13 th to 14 th December 2011
attention!attention!
PUBLIC WATER MANAGEMNET COMPANY “SRBIJAVODE”