+ All Categories
Home > Documents > World Bank Documentdocuments.worldbank.org/curated/en/524781468108550568/pdf/multi-page.pdf ·...

World Bank Documentdocuments.worldbank.org/curated/en/524781468108550568/pdf/multi-page.pdf ·...

Date post: 13-Feb-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 2 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
59
Document of The World Bank FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY F $ V Report No. 1848-PH PHILIPPINES STAFF APPRAISAL REPORT RURAL ELECTRIFICATION PROJECT March 13, 1978 Projects Department East Asia and Pacific Regional Office This document has a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in the performane2 of their official duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without World Bank authorization. Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized
Transcript
Page 1: World Bank Documentdocuments.worldbank.org/curated/en/524781468108550568/pdf/multi-page.pdf · policy for NEA, NPC, MECO and all other utilities. NPC and NEA both report to it. The

Document of

The World Bank

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY F $ V

Report No. 1848-PH

PHILIPPINES

STAFF APPRAISAL REPORT

RURAL ELECTRIFICATION PROJECT

March 13, 1978

Projects DepartmentEast Asia and Pacific Regional Office

This document has a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in the performane2 oftheir official duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without World Bank authorization.

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Page 2: World Bank Documentdocuments.worldbank.org/curated/en/524781468108550568/pdf/multi-page.pdf · policy for NEA, NPC, MECO and all other utilities. NPC and NEA both report to it. The

CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS

US$1.00 = Philippine Peso (P) 7.401 1.00 = 100 centavosP 1.00 = US$0.135P 1 million = US$135,335

UNITS AND MEASURES

1 kilovolt (kV) = 1,000 volts (V)1 megawatt (MW) = 1,000 kilowatts (kW)1 megavolt ampere (MVA) = 1,000 kilovolt amperes (kVA)1 gigawatt hour (GWh) = 1 million kilowatt hours (kWh)1 kilometer (km) = 1,000 meters (m)

1 meter (m) = 100 centimeters (cm)1 hectare (ha) = 10,000 square meters (sq. m)

ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS

Coop - CooperativeDOE - Department of EnergyEDB - Energy Development BoardGNP - Gross National ProductIER - Internal Economic ReturnMECO - Manila Electric CompanyMM - Man-Month

NEA - National Electrification AdministrationNPC - National Power CorporationNRECA - National Rural Electric Cooperative AssociationPDC - Power Development Council

NEA's FISCAL YEAR

Until 1976: July 1 - June 301976 onward: January 1 - December 31

Page 3: World Bank Documentdocuments.worldbank.org/curated/en/524781468108550568/pdf/multi-page.pdf · policy for NEA, NPC, MECO and all other utilities. NPC and NEA both report to it. The

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

PHILIPPINES

NATIONAL ELECTRIFICATION ADMINISTRATION

APPRAISAL OF THE RURAL ELECTRIFICATION PROJECT

STAFF APPRAISAL REPORT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page No.

1. THE POWER SECTOR . . . 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IThe Bank's Role in the Sector . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2Main Characteristics of the Sector . . . . . . . . . . . . 2Development Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

2. THE BORROWER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5

Organization and Management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5Audit and Accounts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6Consolidation and Coordination of Information . . . . . . 6Cooperatives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7Organization and Management. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7Consultants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7Reports and Progress Certificates . . . . . . . . . . . 7Audit and Accounts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7Manpower and Training . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7Insurance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8Tariff Policy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8Load Promotion Programs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9

3. THE POWER MARKET . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9

Historic Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9The Forecast . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11The Rural Electric Cooperatives . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12

4. PROGRAM AND PROJECT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13

General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13Generation and Transmission Facilities . . . . . . . . . 13Program Costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14The Project . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14Scope . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14Objectives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14

This document has a restricted distnbution and may be used by recipients only in the performanceof their official duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed withoul World Bank authorization.

Page 4: World Bank Documentdocuments.worldbank.org/curated/en/524781468108550568/pdf/multi-page.pdf · policy for NEA, NPC, MECO and all other utilities. NPC and NEA both report to it. The

-2-

Page No.

Descri,-Lon 3o o ProJect . . . . . . .. . . . .. .

Location. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5Project Cost. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -Financing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16

Engineering and Construction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17Procurement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18Disbursements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18Environment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19

5. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20

NEA:Past Results and Financial Position . . . . . . . . . . . 20Future Position . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21Financing Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22Future Operating Results. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23

Cooperatives: 23Past Results and Financial Position . . . . . . . . . . . 23Future Position . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23Pampanga Rural Electric Cooperative . . . . . . . . . . . 24Benguet Electric Cooperative. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24La Union Electric Cooperative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24Ilocos Norte Rural Electric Cooperative . . . . . . . . . 25Catanduanes Electric Cooperative . . . . . . . . . . . . 25General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25

6. ECONOMIC JUSTIFICATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26

Power Demand. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26Scope . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26Internal Economic Rate of Return . . . . . . . . . . . . 26

7. SUMMARY OF PROPOSED AGREEMENTS . . . . 27

ANNEXES

1. NEA Organization Chart2. Assumptions in Financial Forecasts3. Statement of Policy4. Related Documents and Data Available in the Project File5. Map IBRD 13281

This report is based on information obtained by B. Abadian, J. Cavallottiand J. Sneddon during an appraisal mission to Manila in September/October1977.

Page 5: World Bank Documentdocuments.worldbank.org/curated/en/524781468108550568/pdf/multi-page.pdf · policy for NEA, NPC, MECO and all other utilities. NPC and NEA both report to it. The

PHILIPPINES

NATIONAL ELECTRIFICATION ADMINISTRATION

APPRAISAL OF THE RURAL ELECTRIFICATION PROJECT

1. THE POWER SECTOR

General

1.C1 The power sector in the Philippines has historically been poorlycoordinated and uneven in performance and institutional strength. In 1970,there were 336 private utilities and 122 public utilities, most of which werevery small and located in urban areas. Since then a number have been takenover by rural cooperatives and some have ceased operating. As of August 1977,about 85 utilities and 73 cooperatives were actually supplying consumers.The Manila Electric Company (MECO), responsible for generation and distributionin the greater Manila area, dominates the private sector, while the NationalPower Corporation (NPC) is the largest public utility. MECO accounted forabout 63%, and NPC 29%, of total electricity generated by utilities in 1976.Many of the smaller utilities have distributed power purchased from NPC and MECObut some have also generated their own power, accounting for the remaining 8%.Only about 26 of the 85 utilities sold more than 5 Gwh in 1976 and only about19 of the 39 generating plants owned were larger than 1 MW. Service by thesmall utilities (and some of the larger) has been substandard, costly, andconfined to the centers of urban areas; no attempt had been made to carry powerto villages. The absence of reliable power supplies has caused many industriesto resort to captive plants to meet their power needs.

1.02 Fragmented ownership of the generation and distribution facilitiesbecame an important obstacle to the coordinated development of the powersector. The Government, therefore, formed the National ElectrificationAdministration (NEA) in 1969 under Republic Act 6038 (revoked in 1973 andreplaced by Presidential Decree 269), which declared the national objectiveof total electrification on an area coverage I1 basis through electriccooperatives. Little progress was made until after the declaration ofmartial law in late 1972. The Government announced in Presidential DecreeNo. 40 that the total electrification of the country was a national policyobjective which should be achieved by establishing island grids, integratinggenerating systems and consolidating electric distribution franchise systems.NPC was made responsible for island grids, the development of all futuregeneration supplying the grids and ultimately, for owning and operating allgenerating facilities. MECO, now the largest generating as well as distribut-ing company, will eventualLy become only a distributing utility; negotiationsfor transferring the bulk of MECO's generating plants and transmission linesto Government are nearing conclusion.

1.03 The Department of Energy (DOE), created in 1977, is the policymakingbody for the power sector responsible for formulating policies and programs

/1 Area coverage means connecting every house or building providedthat the cost of doing so is reasonable in relation to overallsystem costs.

Page 6: World Bank Documentdocuments.worldbank.org/curated/en/524781468108550568/pdf/multi-page.pdf · policy for NEA, NPC, MECO and all other utilities. NPC and NEA both report to it. The

- 2 -

on power development and coordinating the activities of all organizationsconnected with electric power, including approval of the power projectpipeline and the ratemaking policy. Responsibility for granting powerfranchises is also covered and assurances were obtained during negotiationsand incorporated into the Guarantee Agreement that licenses for power genera-tion and distribution will continue to be granted by NEA. The DOE coordinatespolicy for NEA, NPC, MECO and all other utilities. NPC and NEA both reportto it. The Department Secretary is the Chairman of the boards of directorsof both NEA and NPC to ensure coordination of the two corporations.

1.04 The intrasectoral responsibilities of NEA and NPC are clearlydefined. If properly implemented, the reorganization of the sector willlead to better coordination in power development. Progress is alreadyapparent. NEA's eEforts in setting up rural cooperatives have beenwelcomed in the provinces, and consumers have shown themselves willing topay the cost of power supplies whether at low or high tariff levels. NPChas committed itself to a massive generation and transmission developmentprogram, not only in Luzon, where its activities were concentrated in thepast, but also in Mindanao and the Visayas. NEA should have no difficultyin carrying out its share of the program but NPC's responsibilities havebeen greatly increased and it is reorganizing to meet these. Its mana-gerial, technical and financial ability to carry out its ambitious programhas yet to be proven.

The Bank's Role in the Sector

1.05 To date :he Bank has made seven loans to NPC, and IDA one creditto the Government, totaling US$218.3 million, to assist in the developmentof the Philippines' power sector. The first loan, for US$14.4 million,was made in 1957 to provide partial financing for the Binga hydroelectricproject. The most recent, signed in August 1977, made US$58 million availablefor expansion of the transmission system in Luzon, the first stage of acentral load dispatching system, and consultants' services. Although some ofthe projects financed either exceeded the original execution schedules orexperienced cost overruns, all of them are being operated satisfactorily.

1.06 The proposed loan of US$60.0 million would be the first from theBank to NEA for power expansion and would help finance the 1979-1980 portionof the rural electrification program; it would provide access to electricityservice for more than 5.3 million individuals in the countryside and help toincrease incomes arong the poorest population.

Main Characteristics of the Sector

1.07 Electricity generation in the Philippines grew at an annual rate of11.0% over the period 1970-1976, while GDP grew at a rate of 6.0% over thesame period. Per capita electricity generation is estimated at 323 kwh.Installed capacity at the end of 1976 was 3,542 MW including self-production;oil-fired thermal power plants accounted for 80% of total energy generation.

1.08 There are currently approximately 2.3 million subscribers for anestimated population of 43 million. The population serviced throughout thecountry rose from 27% in 1972 to 32% in 1976 as shown below:

Page 7: World Bank Documentdocuments.worldbank.org/curated/en/524781468108550568/pdf/multi-page.pdf · policy for NEA, NPC, MECO and all other utilities. NPC and NEA both report to it. The

-3 -

Towns Cities TotalPopulation Status 1972 1976 1972 1976 1972 % 1976 %

Served by ElectricSystem 5,432 8,064 5,390 5,731 10,822 28 13,795 32

Not served 25,153 26,082 2,842 3,125 27,995 72 29,207 68Total ('0OOs) 30,585 34,146 8,232 8,856 38,817 100 43,002 100

There are marked contrasts in electricity consumption among the differentregiLons. The Luzon market accounts for 73% of all consumption. In its turn,the central area around Manila accounts for more than 80% of consumption onLuzon although less than 65% of the Luzon population lives in this region.

1.09 Public utility companies supply 79% of total electric power, therest being produced by self-production. Self-suppliers (mainly sugar mills,cement plants, and mining enterprises) own 20% of the country's installedcapacity. The following tab:Le shows installed capacity and power generatedin the Philippines in 1976.

INSTALLED CAPACITY AND POWER GENERATION IN PHILIPPINES IN 1976

Capacity GenerationHydro Thermal Total Hydro Thermal Total

----- MW ---------- GWh ----------

1. Public Service 644 2,178 2,822 2,818 8,243 11,061

(a) Governmental 625 97 722 2,733 478 3,211NPC 625 81 706 2,733 478 3,211Others - 16 16 - - -

(b) Private 19 2,081 2,100 85 7,765 7,850MECO 15 1,836 1,851 77 6,889 6,966DLPCO 3 66 69 6 204 210VECO - 61 61 - 262 262Cooperatives - 49 49 - 81 81Others 1 69 70 2 329 331

2. Self Producers - 720 720 - 2,837 2,837

Luzon - 226 226 - 681 681Visayas - 332 332 - 1,336 1,336Mindanao - 162 162 - 820 820

3. Total 644 2,898 3,542 2,818 11,080 13,898

Percentage (%) 18.2 81.8 100.0 20.2 79.8 100.0

Page 8: World Bank Documentdocuments.worldbank.org/curated/en/524781468108550568/pdf/multi-page.pdf · policy for NEA, NPC, MECO and all other utilities. NPC and NEA both report to it. The

- 4 -

Information about the generating capacities and energy production of NPCand MECO is readily available, but a complete analysis of past trends in thePhilippines power sector is hampered by a lack of data about the capacitiesand production of the Bnwl utilities and -rivp--- I'ed rlans r-^-ol_idated statistics of energy consumption for private utilities by class ofcustomer are not readily available except for MECO's customers. As theGovernment has just set up a Department of Energy on which the electricutilities will depend (para 1.03), it is expected that this basic informationwill be kept up to date in future to assure the best allocation of resourcesin the expansion of- the power sector.

Development Program

1.10 NEA aims to establish a cooperative in each province by the end of1977, complete the backbone or primary distribution system by 1980, provideelectricity to all barrios by 1984, and attain total electrification ofthe country by 1990. The following plan has been devised to achieve thosetargets:

No. of Barrios No. of NewYear to be Energized Connections

Annually Annually

1977 2,524 278,9001980 4,531 436,1371984 2,414 572,100

1.11 NPC is also embarking on a large program to provide the generatingplant and transmission lines required for the electrification of the countryas a whole, as well as meeting the increase in demand in areas which alreadyhave adequate service, such as the greater Manila area.

1.12 Significant changes are expected to take place in the sources ofelectric energy in the coming years. The relative importance of petroleumfor power generation would decline to be replaced by hydro, geothermal andnuclear as shown below:

INSTALLED CAPACITY

1976 1985Energy Source MW % MW %

Petroleum 2,898 81.8 4,494 52.8Hydro 644 18.2 2,677 31.5Geothermal - - 745 8.7Nuclear - - 600 7.0

Total 3,542 100.0 8,516 100.0

Page 9: World Bank Documentdocuments.worldbank.org/curated/en/524781468108550568/pdf/multi-page.pdf · policy for NEA, NPC, MECO and all other utilities. NPC and NEA both report to it. The

1.13 The capital investment required for the proposed developmentprogram from 1977 through 1983 is estimated at US$7.3 billion (P 54.0 bil-lion) at current prices including finance charges and price escalation, asshown below:

Investment 1977-1983IJS$ Million %

NPC 6,000 82.0MECO 400 5.5NEA 500 7.0Other 400 5.5

Total 7,300 100.0

The Government will have to provide a large part of the investmentrequired for the power expansion program in the coming years since existingconsumers are only able to contribute about 8% to the construction programeven though the rate of return may reach about 10% on revalued net fixedassets. This is acceptable due to the fact that the cost of residentialservice is at present as high as 5% of the disposable personal income andcurrent coop tariffs approximate the marginal cost of power.

2. THE BORROWER

Organization and Management

2.01 The Borrower would be NEA, a stock corporation fully owned by theGovernment with an authorized capital of two billion pesos, of whichP 618 million was paid up at end-1976. Corporate powers are vested in aBoard of Administrators of iEive members, including NEA's executive head, whois an ex-officio member. The Chairman and members are Presidential appointeesand serve for six-year terms. The General Manager of NPC is also a member ofthe Board.

2.02 NEA was originally created in 1969; its duties and responsibilitieswere redefined in Presidential Decree 269 of August 1973, which is currentlyNEA's charter. The main objective of NEA is the total electrification ofthe Philippines on an area coverage basis. NEA is empowered to make loansto public service entities with preference to cooperatives. NEA is alsoresponsible for licensing electric power franchises and assurances wereobtained and provisions included in the Guarantee Agreement that it willcontinue to do so under the new DOE. Since 1972, NEA has mainly grantedfranchises to rural electric cooperatives, 91 of which were in existence atmid-1977 with 73 supplying electricity and 18 with buildings, backbone linesand distribution systems under construction.

2.03 NEA has its head office in Manila. The current organizationchart is shown in Annex 1. Three Deputy Administrators are responsible foradministration and cooperative development, engineering and materials, and

Page 10: World Bank Documentdocuments.worldbank.org/curated/en/524781468108550568/pdf/multi-page.pdf · policy for NEA, NPC, MECO and all other utilities. NPC and NEA both report to it. The

finance and franchises. In addition, training, special studies and otherdivisions report directly to the Acting Administrator. NEA has met itsresponsibilities efficiently as evidenced by the success of the program; itis generally a well-operated and managed organization but the rapid acceler-ation of the electrification program has caused certain strains. Emphasishas been on initial organization of cooperatives and program implementationwith the day to day utility operations taking a secondary role.

2.04 Staff of NEA are closely involved in the formation and operationof the cooperatives. NEA has developed manuals which lay down standardoperating procedures to be followed by cooperatives. NEA audit, engineeringand other administration staff ensure that these procedures are followed.Standard operating practices are based on those of the National Rural ElectricCooperative Association of US, which originally provided consultants to NEAunder USAID auspices.

2.05 Ten year development and financial plans are compiled for coops inthe initial feasibility and architectural and engineering studies. Thesehave not been updated annually as the coop situation and projected loadgrowth has changed. Currently, five-year plans are only available for fivecoops. It was agreed during negotiations that NEA will form a planning unitthat inter-alia would prepare five year plans for all coops by end-1978 and10 year plans by end-1979; thereafter all would be updated annually.

Audit and Accounts

2.06 NEA's annual accounts were made up on a Government department basisuntil 1974, which precluded the preparation of income statements andbalance sheets. Since 1974, income statements and balance sheets have beenprepared in the conventional commercial form. Accounting is good and thestaff which includes a number of CPA's, are competent.

2.07 The audit of NEA's annual accounts is carried out by the Auditorof the Administration who is appointed by the Auditor-General, the ex-officioauditor. The Auditor of the Administration who serves full time in NEAheadquarters approves all checks prior to payment; the procedure used has ineffect, been a pre-audit rather than a post-audit analysis of the balancesheet. It was agreed during negotiations that the Government, with theassistance of the Bank, will undertake a review of the auditing proceduresfor NEA.

Consolidation and Coordination of Information

2.08 NEA obtains monthly reports on coop operations, construction andother aspects of coop activities. The available information has not beenconsolidated in the past and it was agreed during negotiations that aninformation section will be established in the planning unit to gather andconsolidate informal'ion and statistics relating to all coops.

Page 11: World Bank Documentdocuments.worldbank.org/curated/en/524781468108550568/pdf/multi-page.pdf · policy for NEA, NPC, MECO and all other utilities. NPC and NEA both report to it. The

-7-

Cooperatives

2.09 Organization and Management. Cooperatives are organized withthe help of NEA at the request of district electrification committees whichare formed from local municipal councilors. A feasibility study is carriedout of the proposed cooperative area by NEA staff to ensure that the coop-erative would be financially viable. The cooperative is then registeredwith a board of directors each of whom represents one or more munici-palities /1 as required to limit the maximum number of board members toabout seven. The coops then conclude a loan agreement with NEA. Amanager, and architectural and engineering consultants are appointed onterms and conditions and with qualifications and experience satisfactoryto NEA.

2.10 Consultants. Local consulting firms plan and design the systemand buildings and supervise the construction of both. These firms havegained considerable experience in the design and construction of distributionsystems during the first five years of program implementation. The localfirms will continue to be supervised by NEA with the assistance of StanleyConsultants, Inc. of the U.S. (financed by USAID), whose present contractextends through 1980.

2.11 Reports and Progress Certificates. Cooperatives send reports toNEA on all aspects of operations:

(a) monthly operations;(b) annual budgets - capital and operating; and(c) construction progress and related certificates.

The construction progress certificates are required by NEA before fundsare released to the cooperative to make payments to the contractor.Certificates are issued by the A&E consultants and progress is often alsoverified by NEA staff.

2.12 Audit and Accounts. Coop accounting and management audits arecarried out by NEA staff to verify that accounts and books are properlymaintained and up to date. However, a final audit of the annual accounts isnot carried out and currently the annual income statements and balance sheetsof each coop have no audit certificate. Agreement was obtained duringnegotiations that the annual accounts of each coop be certified by auditorsacceptable to the Bank for the year ending December 31, 1978 and every yearthereafter.

2.13 Manpower and Training. NEA trains all the personnel required toman the coops, including managers, accountants, linemen, electricians, andplant operators. Courses and training tours have also been sponsored inthe US. By the end of 1976, a total of 516 courses had been held covering19,400 participants.

2.14 The Philippines is one of the most advanced developing countriesin the field of rural electrification. The RE program is working well and

/1 Approximately equivalent to a US county.

Page 12: World Bank Documentdocuments.worldbank.org/curated/en/524781468108550568/pdf/multi-page.pdf · policy for NEA, NPC, MECO and all other utilities. NPC and NEA both report to it. The

- 8 -

is being pursued vigorously; consequently, other developing countries arestudying the program for possible use in promoting their own RE programs.During 1976, a conference-study tour on rural electrification was heldwith about 40 participants from 13 countries.

2.15 NEA and the cooperatives are well-manned with adequately trainedand qualified staff. The manpower needs of the RE program are met byrecruitment from the educated and skilled manpower available in thePhilippines, who are then given specific training in the standard proceduresand the functions in which they will be employed in NEA or the cooperatives.

2.16 Insurance. Individual coops have arranged some insurance coveragebut generally coops carry only motor vehicle insurance. NEA is in process ofestablishing a mutual insurance fund to provide adequate coverage for coopfacilities. It was agreed during negotiations that all coops would holdinsurance coverage satisfactory to the Bank.

2.17 Tariff Policy. General NEA policy is that each cooperative is anindividual entity which must be financially self-supporting, although subsidiesare provided in the form of tax exemption and low lending rates that do notexceed 3% p.a. Tariffs are fixed by the individual coop boards to meet thisobjective. In doing so, the coops endeavor to comply with targets laid down byNEA that tariffs should be fixed to cover cash operating expenses 1/ in the firstyear of operation and cash operating expenses plus 15%, 25%, 35% and 50% ofthe sixth year's debt service for the second through fifth years of operation,respectively, so that an aggregate of 125% of the sixth year's amortizationand interest is available to the coop at the beginning of that year.

2.18 Anomalies currently exist in the tariff levels among the cooperatives.Although these will be addressed during the tariff study to be carried outunder Loan 1460-PH (made in 1977 to NPC), two aspects were discussed duringappraisal. The first is the large variation in tariff levels among coops.Tariff levels currently range from P 0.15 (USJ2.0) to g 1.16 (USd15.6),depending on whether the power comes from cheap hydro sources in northernMindanao or from diesel generation for a small coop in South Leyte. Somecross funding from prosperous to less prosperous coops may be justified andcould be achieved by NEA having different terms of lending for the cooper-atives. The second aspect is that there is little or no subsidy for poorconsumers. Generally, coops have a flat rate per kWh whether or not coveredby the minimum charge. Under Loan 1460-PH, it was agreed that the Governmentwill consult with the Bank on its tariff policies when the ongoing tariffstudy is completed, which is expected at end-1978.

/1 Operating expenses excluding depreciation, interest and amortization.

Page 13: World Bank Documentdocuments.worldbank.org/curated/en/524781468108550568/pdf/multi-page.pdf · policy for NEA, NPC, MECO and all other utilities. NPC and NEA both report to it. The

-9-

Load Promotion Programs

2.19 NEA promotes the use of electric power through the followingprograms:

(a) Illumination for Learning and Work;(b) Rural Water Service;(c) Fishermen's Assistance;(d) Small-Scale Industry; and(e) Irrigation.

2.20 The Illumination for Learning and Work project is a program formaking loans of a maximum of 1 50,000 (US$6,700) to RE coops willing toonlend to school boards for schoolhouse wiring. Close liaison is maintainedwith the Department of Education and Culture; evening classes are organizedfor adult education, vocational courses, social activities, and other instruc-tion using educational television. Nine hundred and four public schools with7,281 classrooms had been electrified by mid-1977. Thousands of adults andout-of-school youths have enrolled in various evening classes and for theformal five-year secondary and college courses offered in these schools.

2.21 The Rural Water Service Program began in 1976, the purpose beingthe formation of village water supply coops to construct facilities for apotable water supply comprising an electric pump, a small storage tank and acommunal .standpipe distribution system. Five associations had been formedby mid-1977 and six feasibility studies were under evaluation.

2.22 The Fishermen's Assistance Program provides loans to associationsfor the construction of ice plants, cold storage plants and markets. By mid-1977, NEA had lent F 4.8 million (US$140,000) to five fishermen's associations.

2.23 The Small-Scale Industry Program aims at fostering employmentin the provincial areas by using electric power. The Bank made a loanto NEA of US$ 2.3 million in 1975 to assist in financing machinery for thesecoops. Total loans of 1 3.35 million (US$447,000) had been committed to tencoops by NEA at mid-1977.

3. THE POWER MARKET

Historic Background

3.01 Electric power generated in the Philippines totalled 13,896 Gwh in1976: Luzon producing 73% (10,150 Gwh), the Visayas 13% (1,773 Gwh) andMindanao 14% (1,973 Gwh). A considerable amount of the electric powergenerated in the Visayas (74%) and Mindanao (27%) was produced by captiveindustrial plant.

Page 14: World Bank Documentdocuments.worldbank.org/curated/en/524781468108550568/pdf/multi-page.pdf · policy for NEA, NPC, MECO and all other utilities. NPC and NEA both report to it. The

- 10 -

3.02 The Luzon interconnected system is the main electricity system inthe Philippines and comprises the generating and transmission facilitiesof the two largest- public utility companies operating in the region, namelyMECO, serving the Manila metropolitan area and adjacent zones, and NPC, whichsupplies the proviLncial districts of Luzon. Electric power consumption inthe area served by NPC-MECO grew at an average rate of 11.3% between 1960 and1975; over the same period, GNP rose at an average of 5.8% a year, while thepopulation growth rate was 3.1%. Growth in electric power consumption andGNP from 1960 to 1L975 was as follows:

Consumption Growth Rate GNP Growth RatePeriod % per year % per year

1960-19165 14.5 5.41965-1970 12.3 5.41970-1975 7.2 6.5

3.03 The drop in the growth rate in the last five-year period was aresult of a drastic fall in consumption in 1974 (-1%) by comparison with1973. The fall was due to severe restriction in consumption and an increasein tariffs applied in the Manila metropolitan area following the rise ininternational oil prices. Nevertheless, the Luzon market recovered quickly,the consumption growth rate reaching 12.2% in 1975 and 8% in 1976.

3.04 A summary of development in the integrated Luzon market is givenbelow:

Peak Demand Generation (Gwh) Losses Consumption Load FactorYear MW MECO NPC Total Gwh % Gwh %

1960 368 981 869 1,850 256 13.8 1,594 571965 671 2,514 989 3,503 371 10.6 3,132 601970 1,120 4,771 1,373 6,144 545 8.9 5,599 631975 1,481 6,873 1,669 8,542 601 7.0 7,941 66

3.05 The load factor in the Luzon integrated system is high owing tothe fact that industrial consumption predominates and that there have beencertain restrictions on peak-hour demand in recent years. MECO's losses intransmission and clistribution (9%), and NPC's in transmission (5.8%), arereasonable and have decreased as a whole from 14% in 1960 to 7% in 1976.Small producers in Luzon as well as in the Visayas and Mindanao generallyshow high losses ('over 20%).

3.06 Statistical data on development in electric power production andconsumption in the Visayas and Mindanao, is extremely sketchy and unreliable.Some data on energy production over the 1970-76 period are given below:

Page 15: World Bank Documentdocuments.worldbank.org/curated/en/524781468108550568/pdf/multi-page.pdf · policy for NEA, NPC, MECO and all other utilities. NPC and NEA both report to it. The

- 11 -

Energy Produced (Gwh)

NPC Others TotalYear Visayas Mindanao Visayas Mindanao Visayas Mindanao

1970 8 362 300 315 308 6771974 5 421 1,400 1,250 1,405 1,6711976 9 814 1,764 1,159 1,773 1,973

The Forecast

3.07 Demand forecasts in the Luzon grid prepared by NPC and MECOforesee a growth rate of 10.0% annually for the period 1977-81, whichseems reasonable. Provincial demand is estimated to rise 15% per year,while demand in the Manila metropolitan area is expected to grow at 7.8% ayear. Lahmeyer International, the German consulting firm now reviewingthe future generating expansion program for the Luzon mainland, has estimatedthe power demand growth rate at 11.5% through the 1977-85 period, which isconsidered optimistic. This forecast is based on a correlation betweeneconomic and population growth and the associated increase in power energy.Reasonable demand growth (Gwh) in the Luzon interconnected grid based on anannual growth rate of 10%, is shown in Table 3.1 and summarized below:

Sales Generation RequirementsMECO NPC Total MW Gwh

1976 6,316 2,244 8,560 1,591 9,3531981 9,242 4,576 13,818 2,669 14,964

3.08 The existing generating capacity in Mindanao is approximately554 MW of which 201 MW is owned by NPC. Demand growth to be met by NPCis estimated at about 40% a year over the next five years. The forecastassumes that NPC would absorb the load of existing utilities and wouldconnect to its system some :industries with large power demands. Currentlydemand in the region is increasing so rapidly that a large diesel installa-tion has been committed to augment the existing hydroelectric generationand avoid possible power rationing.

3.09 Existing power supplies in the Visayas subgrids depend almostentirely on private utilities and captive industries (351 MW) which run90% of the installed capacity in the region. NPC has launched a majorgeneration development program, starting with diesel plants and proceeding tothermal, hydro and geothermal plants to meet th'e forecast growth in energydemand. The estimated demand in the areas presently served or to be served

Page 16: World Bank Documentdocuments.worldbank.org/curated/en/524781468108550568/pdf/multi-page.pdf · policy for NEA, NPC, MECO and all other utilities. NPC and NEA both report to it. The

- 12 -

by NPC is forecast to increase from 52 Gwh in 1977 to 1812 Gwh in 1981. Theforecast assumes interconnection of networks on the individual islandsfollowed by interconnection of island grids to cover potential demand,especially from current captive plant and several private franchises withvery high generating costs. Details are given in Table 3.1.

The Rural Electric Cooperatives

3.10 Energy sales from cooperatives accounted for 370 Gwh in 1976with the following breakdown: 81% in Luzon, 8% in the Visayas and 11% inMindanao. Growth in sales by comparison with 1975 was 72%. Energy lossesaccounted for 22% of generation and the energy produced by the cooperativeswas 81 Gwh (17%) of their requirements of 478 Gwh. The high losses weremainly due to the fact that the old distribution networks acquired by thecooperatives are generally inadequate and overloaded. NEA has agreed toplan a program of rehabilitation of the old distribution networks toreduce losses to a 12% average by the end of 1982. The plan will be sentto the Bank for review by mid-1978.

3.11 Energy sales are forecast to increase from 460 Gwh in 1977 to1,430 Gwh in 1981. The mission based its estimates of growth in energy saleson the following assumptions: residential: 33 Kwh-month; commercial: 180Kwh-month; industrial: 10,800 Kwh-month and others: 2,000 Kwh-month. Thesefigures give a weighted monthly consumption per consumer of 55 Kwh-monthwhich is about the present average consumption per capita in the majority oftowns and villages currently served by the cooperatives. Historic andforecast energy sales (see Table 3.2) are summarized below:

-------- in Gwh ----1974 1976 1981

Energy requirements 136 478 1,668Energy generated 15 81 320Purchases 121 397 1,348Losses 31 107 237Sales 105 371 1,431

3.12 Although the rural electric cooperatives maintain monthly statistics,NEA does not consolidate such data. Neither the cooperatives /1 nor NEA makeanalyses in the short or medium term of their power markets or of likely trendsin consumption by categories and number of consumers. As is recommended inpara 2.05, the planning unit would assist the cooperatives in preparing five-year plans and forecasts by the end of 1978 and 10-year plans by the end of1979; thereafter all the plans would be updated annually. All the informationon cooperative activities would also be centralized in the unit.

/1 Only five coops did so for the appraisal.

Page 17: World Bank Documentdocuments.worldbank.org/curated/en/524781468108550568/pdf/multi-page.pdf · policy for NEA, NPC, MECO and all other utilities. NPC and NEA both report to it. The

Table 3.1: FORECAST POWER M4ARKET

Actual Forecast1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981

LUZON GRIDSales (GWh)(a) MECO

Residential 1,486 1,574 1,668 1,766 1,869 1,985Commercial 1,958 2,213 2,430 2,646 2,877 3,124Industrial 2,571 2,770 2,983 3,179 3,409 3,650Street lights 47 50 52 55 57 61Others 254 278 298 317 336 422

Subtotal 6,316 6,855 7,431 7,963 8,548 9,242

Losses (GWh) 649 706 722 761 808 872

Total MECO 6,966 7,561 8,153 8,724 9,356 10,114

(b) NPCUtility 781 988 1,110 1,399 1,555 1,700Industry 967 1,154 1,380 1,625 1,890 2,096Miscellaneous 496 551 611 653 731 780

Subtotal 2,244 2,693 3,101 3,677 4,176 4,576

Losses (GWh) 143 161 186 220 250 274

Total NPC 2,387 2,854 3,287 3,897 4,426 4,850

Generation (GWh) 9,353 10,415 11,440 12,621 13,782 14,964

Peak demand (MW) 1,591 1,774 1,972 2,153 2,420 2,669

MINDANAO GRID

NPC SalesUtility 159 139 177 565 671 842Industry 600 814 1,075 1,633 2,391 3,330Miscellaneous 10 10 16 17 20 23

Subtotal 769 963 1,268 2,215 3,082 4,195

Losses 45 67 76 121 169 190

Generation (GWh) 814 1,030 1,344 2,336 3,251 4,385

Peak demand (MW) 143 186 232 380 530 715

VISAYAS SUBGRIDSNPC sales (GWh) 8.4 49 435 963 1,214 1,727

Losses 0.6 2.6 26 53 72 85

Generation (GWh) 9.0 51.6 461 1,016 1,286 1,812

Peak demand (MW) 2.0 20 70 165 209 295

Page 18: World Bank Documentdocuments.worldbank.org/curated/en/524781468108550568/pdf/multi-page.pdf · policy for NEA, NPC, MECO and all other utilities. NPC and NEA both report to it. The

Table 3.2: ACTUAL AND FORECAST POWER MARKET OF THE ELECTRIC COOPERATIVES

Actual Forecast1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981

Luzon

Energy requirements (Gwh) 122.1 223.3 390.7 449.4 591.1 801.7 936.5 1,098.3Energy generated 4.9 8.9 15.6 18.4 26.3 26.6 30.8 30.4Energy purchased 117.2 214.4 375.1 431.0 564.8 775.1 905.7 1,067.9

Maximum demand (MW) 39.8 70.8 120.5 135.0 177.5 240.8 274.1 321.0Load factor (%) 0.35 0.36 0.37 0.37 0.38 0.38 0.39 0.39

Sales (Gwh) 94.0 169.7 300.9 346.0 472.9 657.4 786.7 944.5Losses (Gwh) 28.1 53.6 89.8 103.4 118.2 144.3 149.8 153.8

(%) 23.0 24.0 23.0 23.0 20.0 18.0 16.0 14.0

VisayasEnergy requirements (Gwh) 4.6 10.5 36.8 60.0 117.3 207.3 273.2 336.7Energy generated 4.6 10.3 36.5 58.0 112.0 199.5 245.0 278.7Energy purchased - - 0.3 2.0 5.3 7.8 28.2 58.0

Maximum demand (MW) 1.1 3.5 12.4 19.6 38.2 65.8 86.6 103.9Load factor (%) 0.35 0.34 0.34 0.35 0.35 0.36 0.36 0.37

Sales (Cwh) 3.5 8.4 29.5 48.0 95.0 170.0 226.8 286.2Losses (Gwh) 1.1 2.1 7.3 12.0 22.3 37.3 46.4 50.5

(%) 24.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 19.0 18.0 17.0 15.0

MindanaoEnergy requirements (Gwh) 9.1 18.6 50.1 86.2 108.9 149.5 201.8 232.9Energy generated 5.6 11.9 28.4 45.2 61.1 62.4 75.2 10.9Energy purchased 3.5 6.7 21.7 41.0 47.8 87.1 126.6 222.0

Maximum demand (MW) 3.1 6.2 16.8 28.1 35.5 47.4 64.0 71.8Load factor (Z) 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.35 0.35 0.36 0.36 0.37

Sales (Gwh) 7.3 14.8 40.1 69.0 87.1 122.6 169.5 200.3Losses (Gwh) 1.8 3.8 10.0 17.2 21.8 26.9 32.3 32.6

(%) 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 18.0 16.0 14.0

Total

Energy requirements (Gwh) l35.8 252.4 477.6 595.6 817.3 1,158.5 1,411.5 1,667.9Energy generated 15.1 31.3 80.5 121.6 199.4 288.5 351.0 320.0Energy purchased ]20.7 221.1 397.1 474.0 617.9 870.0 1,060.5 1,347.9

Sales (Gwh) 104.8 192.9 370.5 463.0 655.0 950.0 1,1d3.0 1,431.0Losses (Gwh) 31.0 59.5 107.1 132.6 162.3 208.5 228.5 236.9

(M) 23.0 24.0 23.0 22.0 20.0 18.0 16.0 14.0

November 1977

Page 19: World Bank Documentdocuments.worldbank.org/curated/en/524781468108550568/pdf/multi-page.pdf · policy for NEA, NPC, MECO and all other utilities. NPC and NEA both report to it. The

- 13 -

4. PROGRAM AND PROJECT

General

4.01 The Rural Electrification Program in the Philippines is designedto accomplish the Government's objective of bringing electric service to thewhole population by 1990. NEA, the national executing agency, has set late1980 as the deadline for achieving its short-term goal of completing thebackbone or primary distribution systems connecting all the municipalitieswithin the area of operation of each cooperative. Medium-term goals, to beachieved by 1984, call for the electrification of all barrios and for theconnection of approximately 4.3 million dwellings housing some 26 millionindividuals. To enable every Filipino to have the benefit of power serviceby 1990, the rural electric cooperatives would have to connect an average of600,000 households a year between 1985 and 1990.

4.02 The rural electrification program for 1978-80 prepared by NEAwith the assistance of Stanley Consultants, Inc. (USA) is shown in Table 4.1and summarized below:

RURAL ELECTRIFICATION PROGRAM (1978-1980)

To be energized Household Backbone system Lateral LinesYear Towns Barrios Connections (Kms) (Kms.)

1978 279 3,549 365,656 6,715 3,2271979 316 4,009 441,763 6,689 3,7031980 183 4,531 436,137 4,100 4,087

4.03 Accomplishment of the targets set by NEA as a means of carryingout the Government's objectives will depend to a large extent on the Govern-ment's own capacity to make the necessary funds available on time to meetlocal costs and the availability of sufficient skilled manpower to implementsuch an ambitious program. According to NEA and its consultants, the countrydoes possess a large enough labor force with the skills and technical trainingneeded to accomplish the targets set. Government gave assurances that anygap in the funds required for the construction of the program scheduled for1978-1980 would be made available to NEA as required.

Generation and Transmission Facilities

4.04 The present generating capacity of the electricity cooperatives is49 MW. A further 69 MW in diesel units is in the process of installation tosupply power in some areas not currently serviced by NPC. As NPC extendsits service and the cooperative systems are connected to the NPC grid,

Page 20: World Bank Documentdocuments.worldbank.org/curated/en/524781468108550568/pdf/multi-page.pdf · policy for NEA, NPC, MECO and all other utilities. NPC and NEA both report to it. The

- 14 -

smaller and less efficient plants will be removed and relocated on otherislands where generating capacity needs to be increased or in areaswithout electric power service.

4.05 By 1980, approximately 4,072 Km. of 69 Kv transmission lines areto be constructed. Since NEA's policy is not to duplicate the servicesprovided by NPC, the cooperatives would set up about 716 Km of transmissionlines in areas where NPC does not construct them.

Program Costs

4.06 The investment costs of the 1978-1980 rural electrificationprogram are estimated at the equivalent of US$228.9 million, with a foreignexchange component of US$112.9 million (49%). Details of the annual programof investments are given in Table 4.2.

4.07 Program cost estimates have been based on estimates for astandard project requiring 151 Km of primary distribution lines, 65 Km ofsecondary lines and 98 Km of service drops at a direct weighted cost ofUS$147 per consumer for the backbone system, US$126 per consumer on thelateral primary lines and US$66 per low voltage connection. These costsreflect September 1977 price levels. The standard project as described isthe average project individual cooperatives would execute in the variousregions of the country. Table 4.3 details costs of the standard project.

The Project

4.08 Scope. The proposed project would help finance the 1979-80 programof NEA, and comprises the construction of 230 individual subprojects of which94 would be new projects and 136 would be expansion of the present distribu-tion systems, including rehabilitation of some old distribution facilitiesacquired by the cooperatives from private franchise holders or frommunicipalities.

4.09 Objectives. One of the fundamental objectives of the proposedproject is improvement in the standard of living of the rural poor, whoconstitute the majority of the low-income population. Once a permanentand reliable electric power supply is available, NEA, in conjunction withthe cooperatives, would go on to organize: drinking-water supply projects,thus improving sanitation in the barrios; pump irrigation projects,opening the way for increased farm output; small-scale industry projects,generating new employment opportunities and reducing the rural exodus tourban centers; and projects to promote electricity consumption by usingelectric motors to power mills now operated by diesel equipment, which iscostlier to run and maintain. In addition, project construction work willprovide employment for approximately 12,000 individuals.

Description of the Project

4.10 The project includes the following items:

(a) 476 Km of 69 Kv transmission lines;

Page 21: World Bank Documentdocuments.worldbank.org/curated/en/524781468108550568/pdf/multi-page.pdf · policy for NEA, NPC, MECO and all other utilities. NPC and NEA both report to it. The

- 15 -

(b) 20,334 Km of primary distribution lines at 13.2/7.6 KV;

(c) 8,743 Km of secondary distribution lines at 220V;

(d) electric motors, pumps and machinery for load promotion;

(e) headquarters facilities, including warehouses for cooperatives;and

(f) consultants' services.

4.11 The single-circuit 69 KV transmission lines would be mounted onwooden poles 45' to 75' long, with ACSR conductors and a steel shieldwire; 4-unit suspended insulator chains and average spans of 110 m. Theprimary distribution system would be mounted on wooden poles 35' to 55'long, using ACSR-type conductors sized to meet the anticipated loaddensity, and pin-type insulators. The average span of the lines would beapproximately 65 m. Approximately 70% of the low voltage distributionsystems would be mounted on the same poles used for the primary distribu-tion networks. Power transformer installations and distribution networkshave been designed with sufficient capacity to supply forecast loads forabout 10 years and also designed for a voltage drop of not more than 10%under full load conditions. The design of the backbone system to cover10 years' load growth to be constructed initially constitutes the least costsolution. With other alternatives (for example to build the backbone systemto cover 5 or 7 years' load growth) the incremental cost to replace theconductors for a larger size and the unavoidable shortages of energy in thesystem would be an uneconomic solution.

Location

4.12 The facilities making up the proposed project would be constructedirn various regions of the island of Luzon, the Visayas and Mindanao (see MapIBRD 13281). The rural areas in the various islands to be served have allbeen the subject of feasibility studies and they were selected on the basisof the following criteria:

(a) proper timing, to ensure that NPC and the cooperatives willhave completed the generating and transmission facilities bythe time the distribution networks are to be energized; and

(b) consideration of the need to provide service to areas where thelack or high cost of electricity has seriously constrainedeconomic development.

Project Cost

4.13 The estimated cost of the project is US$160.5 million, with a foreignexchange component of US$81.8 million, as shown in Table 4.2 and as summarizedbelow:

Page 22: World Bank Documentdocuments.worldbank.org/curated/en/524781468108550568/pdf/multi-page.pdf · policy for NEA, NPC, MECO and all other utilities. NPC and NEA both report to it. The

- 16 -

In millions of US$ In millions of PLocal Foreign Total Local Foreign Total

Materials 20.2 61.3 81.5 149.5 453.6 603.1Labor 16.7 - 16.7 123.6 - 123.6

Consultants 0.2 0.3 0.5 1.4 2.2 3.6Engineering (A&E) 5.1 - 5.1 37.7 - 37.7

Transportation andAdministration 4.0 - 4.0 29.6 - 29.6

Working Equipment 0.8 4.0 4.8 5.9 29.6 35.5Special Projects 9.3 - 9.3 68.8 - 68.8

Headquarters Facilities 5.2 - 5.2 38.5 - 38.5

Load Promotion 0.1 0.5 0.6 1.1 3.7 4.8

Subtotal 61.6 66.1 127.7 456.1 489.1 945.2

ContingenciesPhysical 4.3 3.4 7.7 31.8 25.2 57.0Price 12.8 12.3 25.1 94.7 91.0 185.7

Subtotal 17.1 15.7 32.8 126.5 116.2 242.7

Grand Total 78.7 81.8 160.5 582.6 605.3 1,187.9

Percentage 49.0 51.0 100.0 49.0 51.0 100.0

The base costs were prepared by NEA and its consultants and reflect September1977 prices. Physical contingencies have been estimated at 5% for materialsand 8% for civil works. Price escalation has been calculated on the basis ofan assumed inflation rate of 7.5% from 1977 to 1979 and 7% thereafter forforeign costs and 8% for local costs.

Financing

4.14 A Bank loan of US$60.0 million is proposed, which would finance theforeign exchange costs as follows:

Page 23: World Bank Documentdocuments.worldbank.org/curated/en/524781468108550568/pdf/multi-page.pdf · policy for NEA, NPC, MECO and all other utilities. NPC and NEA both report to it. The

- 17 -

Millions of US$

Hardware 7.6Insulators 1.6Conductors 16.7Transformers, etc. 14.8Meters 6.9Street Lights 1.2Miscellaneous (Radio Communication Equipment, Tools

and Billing Machines) 0.7Materials for Load Promotion 0.5

Total Equipment and Materials 50.0

Consultants 0.3Contingencies 9.7

Total 60.0

NEA expects to finance from other external sources the balance of US$21.8 mil-lion of the foreign exchange costs which will be needed in 1980 to completethe 1979-80 program. OECF is expected to finance NEA's program in theCagayan Valley and NEA has been discussing the possibility of additionalfinancing with other external sources. Local costs (US$78.7 million equiva-lent) would be financed by the Government through equity contributions toNEA. The Government gave assurances that any gap in the local or foreignfunds required for the 1978-80 program would be made available to NEAas required.

Engineering and Construction

4.15 The electric cooperatives will use the services of the followingfour local architecture and engineering (A&E) firms for engineering designand construction supervision of the physical facilities: Trans-Asia,Adrian Wilson Inc., DCCD Engineering Corp., and Engineering and DevelopmentCorporation of the Philippines. These firms have gained considerableexperience in the design and construction of distribution systems duringthe first five years of program implementation. The firms will be supervisedby NEA, with the assistance of Stanley Consultants Inc. of the United States.In addition, NEA would engage outside expertise for specialized tasks inmanagement and engineering to improve the administration of the projectduring construction as required.

4.[6 In general, the transmission lines and the backbone distributionsystem would be built by independent contractors. The lateral lines from thebackbone and the service drops to the consumer connections would be undertakenby the cooperatives on force account./l Each contractor would use one or twoteams of workers with an average of 100 men per subproject. Each cooperative

/1 The cooperatives obtain the rights-of-way of their lines free ofcharge.

Page 24: World Bank Documentdocuments.worldbank.org/curated/en/524781468108550568/pdf/multi-page.pdf · policy for NEA, NPC, MECO and all other utilities. NPC and NEA both report to it. The

- 18 -

would employ between 50 and 70 laborers. The construction period for eachsubproject would range between 4 and 11 months, depending on the scope of theworks; the average rate of progress would be 1.5 km a day for contractorsand 1 km a day for cooperatives on the backbone system. £onstrucL±oil of theproject would start: at the beginning of 1979 and would be completed in thelast quarter of 1981.

Procurement

4.17 Contracts for procurement of equipment and materials of morethan $50,000 to be financed by the proposed loan would be awarded on thebasis of international competitive bidding in accordance with the Bank'sguidelines for procurement. For purposes of bid comparison, a preferencelimited to 15% of the c.i.f. price of imported goods, or the customs duty,whichever is lower, will be extended to qualified local manufacturers.Contracts for materials and equipment of less than $50,000 up to an aggregatelimit of $350,000, and civil works contracts (which the Bank would notfinance) will be tendered on a competitive basis in accordance with NEA'snormal procedures, which are satisfactory to the Bank.

4.18 NEA will act as the procurement agent for all goods and relatedservices required Eor the project. NEA will allocate materials to thecooperatives on a cost plus handling and freight basis, but each cooperativewould be responsible for storing these materials in its warehouse. NEA plansto issue invitations to bid for the first materials and equipment contract($14,000,000) after the proposed loan has been approved by the Bank. Thefirst partial delivery is expected to arrive in the Philippines in November/December 1978. NEA and its consultants estimate that in order to avoidshortages of materials during the construction of backbone systems andrapidly increasing household connections, about US$10 million in stocks ofmaterials would be required.

Disbursements

4.19 Funds from the proposed loan would be disbursed against 100% ofthe c.i.f. cost of imported equipment and materials, 100% of the ex-factorycost of locally-procured equipment and materials, and 65% of foreign equipmentprocured locally, and 100% of the cost of services of consultants. Thefollowing table shows estimated loan disbursements.

Page 25: World Bank Documentdocuments.worldbank.org/curated/en/524781468108550568/pdf/multi-page.pdf · policy for NEA, NPC, MECO and all other utilities. NPC and NEA both report to it. The

- 19 -

IBRD fiscal year Disbursements duringand semester semester and cumulative

Semester Cumulative

1979December 31, 1978 2.12 2.12June 30, 1979 13.88 16.00

1980December 31, 1979 18.26 34.26June 30, 1980 18.56 52.82

1981December 31, 1980 5.42 58.24June 30, 1981 1.76 60.00

The closing date would be December 31, 1981, three months after the estimatedcompletion of the project, to allow for some unexpected delays.

4.20 As execution of the rural electrification program is a continuousprocess, any undisbursed amount from the proposed loan would be applied tocomponents of the program similar to those included in the project, followingconsultation with the Bank.

Environment

4.21 A team of specialists provided by the Government of the PhilippinesInter-Agency Committee onl Ecological Studies (ICES) is preparing an assessmentof possible adverse consequences for the environment arising out of the ruralelectrification program. This study is expected to be completed soon; noadverse impact on the project is expected. NEA will submit this study byJune 30, 1978 for review by the Bank and consideration would be given at thattime as to which of its recommendations, if any, should be incorporated inthe project.

Page 26: World Bank Documentdocuments.worldbank.org/curated/en/524781468108550568/pdf/multi-page.pdf · policy for NEA, NPC, MECO and all other utilities. NPC and NEA both report to it. The

Table 4.1: RURAL ELECTRIFTCATION PROCRAM1, 1978-80

llousehold Backbone Lateral lines Add-ons Trans. linesYear Region Toavns Barrios connections km Consumers km Consumers Consumers km

1978 1 38 445 43,333 680 23,246 412 11,784 8,30311 - 194 9,014 - - 178 5,161 3,853

TII 32 366 44,001 715 19,577 335 9,735 14,689IV 30 5s5 61,090 371 18,353 463 13,434 29,303

v 19 4t2 32,141 405 11,623 377 10,458 10,060VI 36 388 42,337 1,830 22,021 358 10,316 10,000 240

VII 31 185 25,670 502 18,963 169 4,922 1,785VIII 12 278 23,187 257 7,339 254 7,393 8,455

Ix 9 159 14,375 229 5,505 146 4,229 4,641X 36 214 32,387 1,124 22,023 196 5,693 4,671

XI 15 128 16,771 640 9,121 86 3,404 4,246XII 21 275 21,350 762 12,847 253 7,315 1,188

Total 274 3,549 365,656 6,715 170,618 3,227 93,844 101,194 204

1979 1 36 452 47,656 742 22,023 415 11,971 13,662II 40 224 35,634 1,131 24,469 206 5,959 5,206

ITT 19 368 33,N13 480 11,624 336 9,788 11,601TV 59 544 65,777 1,152 36,093 498 14,472 15,212

V 17 495 40,313 200 10,399 453 13,165 16,749VI 9 433 42,918 131 5,505 398 11,514 25,899 25

VII 38 267 37,284 591 23,245 244 7,102 6,937VIII 42 333 46,645 769 25,694 304 8,654 12,297

IX 17 159 22,260 511 10,339 146 4,224 7,637X 16 299 27,632 380 9,789 293 8,513 9,330

XI 15 142 24,587 282 9,176 148 3,777 11,634XII 8 293 18,044 320 4,895 270 7,794 5,355

Total 316 4,009 441,763 6,689 193,311 3,703 106,933 141,519 25

iqn0 I 10 454 40,555 240 5,506 417 10,822 24,227II 38 274 33,567 790 19,819 252 6,560 7,188 451

III 5 355 34,112 130 2,753 325 8,498 22,860IV 37 617 65,650 752 20,371 565 14,765 30,514

V 7 499 39,052 125 3,854 388 11,946 23,252VI 4 483 46,903 108 2,202 444 11,559 33,142

VII 16 396 37,025 263 8,809 358 9,505 18,711VIII 27 427 45,428 495 14,865 390 10,220 20,343

IX 10 247 24,679 280 5,507 233 5,912 13,260X 17 306 26,729 380 9,360 280 7,326 10,043

XI 8 165 22,206 349 4,404 152 3,998 13,808XII 4 308 20,228 196 2,202 283 7,374 10,652

Total 1R3 4,531 436,137 4,100 99,652 4,087 108,485 228,000 451

Page 27: World Bank Documentdocuments.worldbank.org/curated/en/524781468108550568/pdf/multi-page.pdf · policy for NEA, NPC, MECO and all other utilities. NPC and NEA both report to it. The

Table 4.2 ESTIMATED ANNUAL PROGRAM EXPENDITURES

(US$' 000)

1978 1979 1980 1978-80

Foreign Local Total Foreign Local Total Foreign L.ocal Total Foreign Local Total

1. Materials

(a) Ucstribution network

20.1n Poles, crossarms, anchor

logs - 7,458 7,458 - 8,767 8,767 - 7,444 7,444 - 23,669 23,669

13.84 Hardware 4,205 874 5,079 4,943 1,027 5,970 4,197 872 5,069 13,345 2,773 16,118

2.2R Insulators 837 - 837 981 - 981 833 - 833 2,651 - 2,651

26.70 Conductors, grounds, guy

accessories 9,281 501 9,782 10,911 591 11,502 9,263 502 9,765 29,455 1,594 31,049

24.11 iransformers, cut-outs,

arresters 8,845 - 86.45 10,397 - 10,397 8,828 - 8,828 28,070 - 28,070

1.35 Sectionalizing devices 494 - 494 581 - 581 493 - 493 1,568 - 1,568

9.53 Meters 3,489 - 3,489 4,101 - 4,101 3,482 - 3,482 11,072 - 11,072

2.04 Street lights 743 - 743 874 - 874 744 - 744 2,361 - 2,361

Subtotal 27,894 8,833 36,h27 32,788 10,385 43,173 27,840 8,818 36,658 88,522 28,036 116,558

(b) Transmssion lines

Poles, crossarms, etc. - 512 512 - 54 54 - 962 962 - 1,528 1,528

(c) MIscellaneous equipment - - - 300 - 300 400 - 400 700 - 700

Subtotal I -- ,Z894 9,345 37,239 33,088 10,439 43,527 28,240 9,780 38,020 89,222 29,564 118,786

IE. Civil Works

Engineering (A&E) - 2,325 2,325 - 2,734 2,734 - 2,326 2,326 - 7,385 7,385

Labor - distribution - 7,067 7,067 - 8,308 8,308 - 7,054 7,054 - 22,429 22,429

Labor - transmission lines - 722 722 - 219 219 - 1,243 1,243 - 2,184 2,184

Transportation & administrative

fees - 1,856 1,856 - 2,181 2,181 - 1,852 1,852 - 5,889 5,889

Headquarters facilities - 2,324 2,324 - 2,757 2,757 - 2,432 2,432 - 7,513 7,513

Special projects - 3,673 3,673 - 3,447 3,447 - 3,307 3,307 - 10,427 10,427

Working equipment - 697 697 2,000 96 2,096 2,000 - 2,000 4,000 793 793

Power plants - 3,674 3,674 - 1,533 1,533 - 1,640 1,640 - 6,847 6,847

Subtotal II _ 22,338 22,338 2,000 21,275 23,275 2,000 19,854 21,854 4,000 63,467 67,467

III. Others

Consultant's services - - - 150 80 230 150 80 230 300 160 460

Load promotion - - - 250 75 325 250 75 325 500 150 650

Subtotal III _ - _ 400 155 555 400 155 555 800 310 1.110

IV. Physical Contingencies

Materials 1,395 467 1,862 1,639 526 2,180 1,425 493 1,918 4,474 1,486 5,960

Civil works - 1,786 1,786 160 1,702 1,862 160 1,588 1,748 320 5,076 5,396

Subtotal IV 1,395 2,253 3,648 1,814 2,228 4,042 1,585 2,081 3,666 4,794 6,562 11,356

V. Price Escalation

Foreign 1,757 - 1,757 5,222 - 5,222 7,079 - 7,079 14,058 - 14,058

Local - 3,393 3,393 - 5,115 5,115 - 7,649 7,649 - 16,157 16,157

Subtotal V 1,757 3,393 5,150 5,222 5,115 10,337 7,079 7,649 14,728 14,058 16,157 30,215

Total cost 31,046 37,329 68,375 42,524 39,212 81,736 39,304 39,519 78,823 112,874 116,060 228,934

February 1978

Page 28: World Bank Documentdocuments.worldbank.org/curated/en/524781468108550568/pdf/multi-page.pdf · policy for NEA, NPC, MECO and all other utilities. NPC and NEA both report to it. The

Table 4.3: DIRECT COST FOR A STANDARD PROJECT

(US$)

M4aterials Labor

Quantity Unit cost Foreign Local Unit cost Total

Poles 2,713 45.0 - 122,085 13.8 37,439

Pole top assemblies 1,630 31.9 43,158 8,839 4.0 6,520

Conductors (km) 585 249., 142,981 2,918 50.0 29,250

Guy assemblies 977 12.7 129408 3.0 2,931

Anchor assemblies 920 10.5 95660 7.1 6,532

Distribution transf. S.Ph 503 283.6 142,661 12.0 6,036

Distribution transf. T.Ph 12 1,343.0 16,127 17.0 204

Secondary assemblies 1,210 4.17 5,046 1.2 1,452

Service assemblies 10,225 3.49 35,686 1.2 12,270

Miscellaneous 1,598 15.7 25,089 3.0 4,794

Total 432 816 133,842 10 7 428

Materials Labor Total

Foreign component 432,816 - 432,8i6Local component 133,842 107,428 241,270

Total 566,658 1074287

Meter & Meter Loop Service drops _Foreign Local Total Materials & Labor (USS'

Service entrance cable 2.70 2170 K15 and connectors 4,19

Connectors 0.81 0>81 #6 duplex 8.51Ground rod clamp 0.54 0.54 K10 2,70Meter 8.90 8.90 Service entrance

Ground rod 4.73 4.73 and meter 24.82

Staples 0.81 081

Ground wire 0.54 0.54 Total 42.24

Total materials 15.52 3.51 21.03

Labor 3,79 3v/19

Total 15.52 7.30 24.82

Project Scope to Serve 4,894 Corisumers

56.0 kilometers of single phase 7.62 KV 18 kilometers of secondary on secondary poles29.4 kilometers of two-phase 7.62/13.2 KV 47 kilometers of underbuild secondary65.8 kilometers of three-phase 7.62/13.2 KV 97.9 kilometers of service drops

151.2 kilometers of primary distribution

November 1977

Page 29: World Bank Documentdocuments.worldbank.org/curated/en/524781468108550568/pdf/multi-page.pdf · policy for NEA, NPC, MECO and all other utilities. NPC and NEA both report to it. The

- 20 -

5. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS

NEA: Past Results and Financial Position:

5.01 NEA's annual accounts were compiled on a government departmentalstyle until 1973 which focused on the budget aspect of operations and didnot distinguish between capital and recurring expenditures. Following theincorporation of NEA as a government corporation, commercial accountscomprising income statements and balance sheets have been prepared since1974. Income statements and balance sheets for 1974-76 are shown in Table 5.1.

5.02 In the past, foreign funds have been received from USAID loans;Japanese reparations which Government has passed to NEA as equity; localfunds have also been provided by government as equity. A summary of NEA'sDecember 1976 balance sheet is as follows:

Millions ofAssets p US$ %

Fixed assetsEquipment and development 39.6 5.3 4.1Less: Depreciatioa and amortization 1.9 0.2 0.2

37.7 5.1 3.9

Loans receivable 761.4 102.9 78.6Current assets 169.1 22.8 17.5

Total assets 968.2 130.8 100.0

Equity and Liabilities

Equity 622.6 84.1 64.3Debt 331.1 44.7 34.2Current liabilities 14.5 2.0 1.5

968.2 130.8 100.0

5.03 Authorized capita:L is currently 1 2 billion (US$270 million) whichshould suffice through 1982 when the limit may need to be increased.

5.04 Loans receivable at end-1976 were made up as shown below:

Page 30: World Bank Documentdocuments.worldbank.org/curated/en/524781468108550568/pdf/multi-page.pdf · policy for NEA, NPC, MECO and all other utilities. NPC and NEA both report to it. The
Page 31: World Bank Documentdocuments.worldbank.org/curated/en/524781468108550568/pdf/multi-page.pdf · policy for NEA, NPC, MECO and all other utilities. NPC and NEA both report to it. The

- 21 -

Millions ofP US$ _

Private industries 6.8 0.9 0.9Systems taken over 0.1 - -Municipalities 13.2 1.8 1.7Old cooperatives 8.6 1.2 1.1New cooperatives 715.6 96.7 94.0

744.3 100.6 97.7

Short-term and other loans -Load promotion 17.1 2.3 2.3

761.4 102.9 100.0

An additional P 8.0 million (US$1.2 million) of amortization on loans wasoverdue for payment, mainly for loans to private and municipal utilitiesthat had stopped payment in anticipation of being taken over by a cooperative.Such loans are repaid to NEA from the compensation payable to the owners forthe assets on takeover. If the amount of the compensation does not cover theoutstanding loan, collateral assets do so.

5.05 Most of the new cooperatives are within the five-year grace periodof the loans made to them; a pattern of repayment performance has thereforenot yet emerged. While there is some variation in the performance of individualcooperatives, NEA has been successful in ensuring that the cooperatives followefficient operating procedures and has established reasonable standards forsetting tariffs. If some of the cooperatives have difficulty in servicingtheir loans, NEA has the authority and will consider steps to alleviate theposition of the financially weaker cooperatives. These steps include themerging of less viable cooperatives into larger cooperatives and some cross-subsidization to enable the smaller cooperatives to meet their financialobligations while keeping tariffs at reasonable levels. Both the Bank andNEA will closely monitor this aspect of the program.

5.06 A substantial portion of NEA's expenditures to date, although of arecurring nature, have long-term benefits. P 32.4 million (US$4.4) of suchexpenditures had been capitalized at end 1976 for write off over 40 years.In the circumstances the procedure is correct and acceptable to the Bank.

NEA - Future Position

5.07 NEA has performed services in the past which it has not charged tothe cooperatives; it proposes to charge for its services in the future.Operating expenses have been less than 92% of interest and other operatingrevenues in the past but are forecast not to exceed 90% through 1982 as NEAintends to take steps to increase interest rates and shorten repaymentperiods. The pattern of such lending will not emerge until follow-up loans

Page 32: World Bank Documentdocuments.worldbank.org/curated/en/524781468108550568/pdf/multi-page.pdf · policy for NEA, NPC, MECO and all other utilities. NPC and NEA both report to it. The

- 22 -

are made to individual coops at the higher interest rates that will be decildedfor each individual coop when the loans are made. Forecast Income and FundsFlow Statements and Balance Sheets are given in Table 5.2

Financing Plan

5.08 NEA's lending program is much greater than anything that hasbeen accomplished in the past, mainly due to the electrification programgearing up over the next few years. It will lend at least P 3,282 million(US$444 million) through 1982, about four times the accumulated loans at end1976; in addition about P 52 million (US$7 million) will be required to meetNEA's equipment and development expenditures making capital requirementsthrough 1982 an aggregate of 1 3,334 million (US$450 million). To financethis amount, about 59% would be borrowed abroad; government equity wouldprovide 37%; and internal cash generation would provide 6% as shown in thefinancing plan which follows:

FINANCING PLAN 1977-82

Aillions ofP US$ %

Internal cash generation 523 70 15.6Less: Debt service and working capital 336 45 10.0

Internal funds available 187 25 5.6Borrowing 1,969 266 59.0Equity 1,238 167 37.1Cash required (60) (8) (1.7)

Loans to be made andcapital investment 3,334 450 100.0

5.09 The proposed Bank loan of P 444 million (US$60 million) and thealready committed P 17 million (US$2 million) from Loan 1120-PH amounts toabout 14% of NEA's capital requirements and 23% of the foreign borrowingneeded through 1982; USAID has committed P 355 million (US$48 million), or18%; French suppliers credits of P 135 million (US$ 18 million) for dieselengines and transmission equipment will provide another 7%; OECF credits ofP 292 million (US$39 million) or 15% are expected to be available for expen-ditures in the Cagayan Valley; a further P 225 million (US$30 million), or

Page 33: World Bank Documentdocuments.worldbank.org/curated/en/524781468108550568/pdf/multi-page.pdf · policy for NEA, NPC, MECO and all other utilities. NPC and NEA both report to it. The

- 23 -

11%, may come from ADB; about FL 45 million (US$6 million), or 3%, is antici-pated from KFW; and P 457 million (US$62 million), or 23%, remains to bearranged. No difficulty is expected in doing so as NEA is already in contactwith other external sources, and the Bank may provide additional fundstowards the end of the five-year period. Government has provided local fundsas equity in the past and has guaranteed the program through 1980 (see para4.03), the period of the Bank-financed project.

NEA's Future Operating Results

5.10 NEA's future financial position is expected to remain sound; annualoperating expenses and interest are not expected to exceed 90% of revenues;debt service coverage on an annual basis is expected not to be below 1.5times (1978); the debt/equity ratio is expected to reach a maximum of53J47 in 1982; and the current ratio is not anticipated to fall below 7.0(1982). However, in order to help safeguard the financial situation, it wasagreed the Government would indemnify NEA for any additional costs forservicing the proposed loan arising from fluctuations in exchange rates.

Cooperatives: Past Results and Financial Position

5.11 Almost all the 73 operating cooperatives are still within the firstfive years of operation; some only began operating recently while othersbegan operation on various dates back to 1972. The degree of financialviability depends on the stage of development and the consequent householdincomes of each cooperative area. Each cooperative fixes its tariffs toproduce the revenues it requires (see para 2.17). The coops remain finan-cially viable because of this and because interest is financed during thefive-year grace period to keep tariffs down to acceptable levels.

5.12 In view of the short history of the cooperative system an analysisof past results would not, however, be indicative of future performance andthis will need to be carefu:Lly monitored.

Cooperatives - Future Position

5.13 Financial plans for five years are currently available for fivecoops only, again because of the concentration on establishing the programand the coops. A covenant is included in the proposed loan agreement thatfive-year plans will be available for all coops by end 1978 and ten-yearplans by end 1980 (see para 2.05). The five coops for which plans areavailable, however, are repcesentative of the whole: two very viable entitiesin well developed areas - Pampanga and Benguet; one coop of average viability- La Union; and two of poor viability - Ilocos Norte, which is connected tothe NPC grid and covers one of the least developed areas of Luzon, andCatanduanes, which obtains its power from its own diesel generation and islocated on a small island off Southern Luzon.

5.14 The forecasts which are discussed below, have been based on thephysical and financial plans prepared by the coops and reviewed by NEA.Figures are based on the individual towns and villages to be connectedthrough 1982 with forecast MW loads and Kwh sales expected for existing and

Page 34: World Bank Documentdocuments.worldbank.org/curated/en/524781468108550568/pdf/multi-page.pdf · policy for NEA, NPC, MECO and all other utilities. NPC and NEA both report to it. The

- 24 -

future residential, commercial, industrial and public lighting consumers.Capital and operating expenditures have been estimated to provide and operatethe re'5 plant and services for these consumers. The forecasts assume 7%p.a. inflation and net operating assets have been revalued on that basis.Detailed assumptions in the financial forecasts are given in Annex 2.

Pampanga Rural Electric Cooperative

5.15 Energy sales are expected to increase from 46 Gwh in 1977 to 187 Gwhin 1982, an average annual rate of growth of 33%; average tariffs, based on arate of return on net fixed assets in operation of 8% p.a., are expected toincrease from P 0.38 (USJ5.1) in 1977 to P 0.51 (USA6.9) in 1982 at currentprices and in real terms are expected to decrease to p 0.34 (USJ4.6) in 1982.Contributions to construction are forecast to average 25% over the fiveyears; the debt/equity ratio is expected to fall from 85/15 in 1977 to66/34 by 1982. Pampanga is financially viable by any standards and shouldcontinue to prosper.

Benguet Electric Cooperative

5.16 Benguet includes the city of Baguio in its franchise area and isalso a viable cooperative. Energy sales are expected to increase from 66 Gwhin 1977 to 87 Gwh in 1982; tariffs based on an 8% rate of return on revaluednet fixed assets in operation, are forecast to increase from P 0.33 (USd4.5)(USd6.6.) to P 0.48 in current prices which is equal to P 0.32 (USd4.3) the1977 average, in real terms. Contributions to construction are expected toaverage about 41%; debt/equity ratios are expected to fall from 71/29 in 1977to 48/52 in 1982; ard current ratios are forecast to be about 2.1 throughoutthe forecast period. Benguet like Pampanga is financially viable and boththese cooperatives should have no difficulty in supplying all power demandsat acceptable tarifE levels.

La Union Electric Cooperative

5.17 La Union coop's energy sales are forecast to increase from 16 Gwhin 1977 to 88 Gwh in 1982, an average annual growth rate of 42%; averagetariffs are expected to range from P 0.37 (USV5.0) in 1977 to P 0.50(USA6.8) in 1982 or about the same level as Pampanga and Benguet. Theresults for 1978 are based on NEA's requirement that coops should earn 50% ofthe debt service in the fifth year of operation - 1979 in La Union's case;results for the folLowing years are based on rates of return of about3%, 5%, 7%, and 8% on revalued net fixed assets in operation. Contributionsto construction on this basis increase to 46% annually by 1982; the debt/equity ratio falls to 61/39; but the current ratio falls to 0.9 as borrowingsof about P 7 million (US$ 1 million) over those currently programmed will beneeded to cover the funds required for La Union's development program.

Page 35: World Bank Documentdocuments.worldbank.org/curated/en/524781468108550568/pdf/multi-page.pdf · policy for NEA, NPC, MECO and all other utilities. NPC and NEA both report to it. The

- 25 -

Ilocos Norte Rural Electric Cooperative

5.18 Energy sales are expected to grow from 16.5 Gwh to 40.6 Gwh, 1977through 1982 or at an average annual growth rate of 19%. Tariffs required,based on rates of return of 3% rising to 8% on revalued net fixed assets inoperation are forecast to double at current prices, from P 0.42 (USd5.7) toP 0.84 (USil.4) or to P 0.56 (USd7.6) in real terms. Borrowings currentlyprogrammed would require to be increased by at least P 12 million(US$1.6 million) to cover the cash deficits in the funds flow. Ilocos NorteCoop because of being located in an underdeveloped area, would requireassistance in ways not currently programmed by NEA if the financial situationis to remain acceptable and average tariffs are to be kept down to reasonablelevels.

Catanduanes Electric Cooperative

5.19 Energy sales for this island coop are expected to increase from3.9 million Kwh in 1977 to 19 million Kwh in 1982; average tariffs based ongraduated rates of return to reach 8% are forecast to increase from P 0.96(USa 13.0) in 1977 to P 1.27 (US¢17.2) per Kwh in 1982 in current prices andto reduce to P 0.85 (USi11.4) in real terms. The current tariff is P 0.50(USi6.8) on average. The projected tariffs are increasingly high and someameliorating action is required to assist the consumers of Catanduanes Coop(See para 2.18).

General

5.20 The sample financial forecasts discussed reveal that some coopswill be able to yield acceptable rates of return. Other coops, however,will need special assistance to keep their tariffs down to acceptablelevels. This may be accomplished by shortening lending terms and increas-ing interest rates to prosperous coops and transferring the funds sogenerated within NEA to less prosperous coops by giving them soft termsfor borrowing. Some cases may require equity to be given as grants; andother coops may need to be merged with their more prosperous neighbors.

5.21 A definite policy cannot be evolved until five-year and preferablyten-year plans for all coops are available so that the overall position canbe consolidated for the country as a whole. Any decisions on adjustingtariffs to make average levels more equitable among coops will need to awaitthe outcome of the ongoing study of power sector tariffs financed under Loan1460-PH of 1977 to NPC. However, in order to safeguard NEA's position, toassure the continued financial viability of the rural electrification program,and that consumers pay for power at tariff rates that approach economic cost,it was agreed during negotiations that NEA would generally follow and causethe coops to follow the financial policies outlined in Annex 3. The issuanceof the policy statement by NEA is a condition of effectiveness of the pro-posed loan.

Page 36: World Bank Documentdocuments.worldbank.org/curated/en/524781468108550568/pdf/multi-page.pdf · policy for NEA, NPC, MECO and all other utilities. NPC and NEA both report to it. The

Table 5.1Page 1 of 2

PHILIPPINES

NATIONAL ELECTRIFICATION ADMINISTRATION

Income Statements: FY1974-76(Thousands of Pesos)

Year ended June 30., 1974Years ended December 31, 1975/76 1974 1975 1976

RevenuesInterest ReceivedCooperatives 2,011 9,751 16,991Private franch;ises 1,881 561 615Municipal systems 3,057 761 922Deposits 2,790 1,958 1,234

9,739 13,031 19,762

Miscellaneous 3 435 2,648

Total revenues 9,742 13,466 22,410

Operating ExpenditureInterest - 1,489 6,504Personnel costs 2,909 5,948 7,922Transport and travel 553 1,319 1,333Rent, power and water 482 1,074 1,433Other administrative costs, 778 1,990 2,170Amortization of clevelopment costs 136 85 438Depreciationr 28 252 670

Total expenditure 4,886 12,157 20,470

Net income 4,856 1,309 1,940

Expenditure/revenue (%) 50.1 90.2 91.3

Page 37: World Bank Documentdocuments.worldbank.org/curated/en/524781468108550568/pdf/multi-page.pdf · policy for NEA, NPC, MECO and all other utilities. NPC and NEA both report to it. The

Table 5.1Page 2 of 2

Balance Sheets: FY1974-76(Thousands of Pesos)

Year ended June 30, 1974Years ended December 31, 1975/76 1974 1975 1976

AssetsProperty, plant and equipment - at cost 797 5,322 7,168Less: Accumulated depreciation 178 430 1,102

619 4,892 6,066

Development - at cost 4,349 11,338 32,443Less: Accumulated amortization 136 316 817

4,213 11,022 31,626

[nvestments in subsidiaries 193 1,825 2,765

Long-term debt 161,311 504,610 758,679

Current AssetsCash 98,305 53,497 29,963Amortization and interest receivable 8,923 8,846 10,575Receivables 5,724 16,058 11,137Inventory 18,503 64,345 117,453

Total current assets 131,455 142,746 169,128

Total fixed assets 297,791 665,095 968,264

Equity and LiabilitiesEquityPaid-in capital 253,860 437,491 618,214Retained earnings 4,856 4,936 4,405

Total equity 258,716 442,427 622,619

Long-term debt 7,306 196,849 331,103

Current LiabilitiesPayables 2,619 5,242 14,542DBP Fund trustee 29,150 20,577 -

Total current liabilities 31,769 25,819 14,542

Total equity and liabilities 297,791 665,095 968,264

Current ratio 4.1 5.5 11.6Debt/equity ratio 3/97 31/69 35/65

Page 38: World Bank Documentdocuments.worldbank.org/curated/en/524781468108550568/pdf/multi-page.pdf · policy for NEA, NPC, MECO and all other utilities. NPC and NEA both report to it. The

TABLE 5.2Page 1 of 3

Fl Ill I - ''L. NS N[iC A1: INANC JAL F'O FEL CnS r 1 977- s2

FO(R THE PERIOD BEOTNNNG .ra: JAN IY 197;1/FRE:PPT Rr Fr,ARF- MAR :1. 19?7

1 2'> S3 A4 5 i197.7 1 97 19/9 193() 1991 1.982

I NC'OME STTr, I

T I rI (O.US,,ANDES FE'L 89

FiZY V L.. N lJ L S1IN TFCiF S T c0c0fr s 29.3483 53573 63006 8 62 01. 10303.s35 1.19065- -OTH1E LOANS 2?050 31:39 50 7 5 9 3 1 1.048 1.3195DIEFOSM S 1T3>260 .1.500 157) 1575 .15 75 1075TRhINING F:E:: 68E3 12;4 t .oo 150 16.2 1. 0PROCURi:EMENT FEES 1007 1 r243 231.0 2378 3598 4 '51

'T CIfL R E V EN U ES'3 33733 .5.9 r5 7 9 77906 99 9 37 9 .1 19463 .1.33 5-30

Or'ERA oINO EXPENSESO E R -ATIONi 1.1 5()0 1.3000 1.4000 15000 16000 1 ;700(It E F' R E C I A T I O N 1 60 2077 2306 2563 27 7' 2963

T OTAI. EXFENSE S .1.310 8 t15077 16306 1 75 63 1037 5 7 .I 9 963

OPERATING INCOME 2 06 2 44502' 61600 8 2 27 6 100;7 1 t I315 6

NL F INCOME. DE.I OREJINTE E r: S T 20625 4 4002)) 02 61600 3-2276 1007-1.1 1 1 856 67

I N'r E L SrT 1 6 6 2 26356 39900 ? 5 9i 0'5 1 80306 1 0 36 5 D

Nl.ET INCOME: 7463 1;7646 6 1 620 2322;5 20405 I 4;509

IJETA'I NECED EA RF;NI NGS 7463 17646 2162 '2i0 32 23220 204 0 14909

EXPENSES+INTEREST/

. . . . . REVENUES 0.78 0.70 0.72 0.77 0.83 0.89

Page 39: World Bank Documentdocuments.worldbank.org/curated/en/524781468108550568/pdf/multi-page.pdf · policy for NEA, NPC, MECO and all other utilities. NPC and NEA both report to it. The

TABLE 5.2Page 2 of 3

FIl 3311 INLS- NF-OF TNANt:131 I'-r3cEET5 1977 82

R O 13 I'L 1;01 t)l O Fi[:r;INNlNS JAN L9 197/,'R3L 51 r IFE r;F r; L I M A 31 I I '/?1

L.0 2.0 3,0 4.0 5'.0 6.0 6.519,7 9 /3 1979 198930 3901 19132 19332

TOI AL

F-UNDI'/ i L tlWSTn 1MM N T

(143r 1L TON]] (1 5(35)<

3 N r L ITOL S(311t: ESnl FUlNDl!;

01F1F R5 N NI NA 20-2 N44;0? f,lS600 0.2276 100711 11567 42020101PrNECLATION I.,,001 2077 2.306 2563 2757 2963 L4274DEVI 34OYMENI7NTS 1.'] 9tr0 o 23000 47900 71800 94500 247321LNTEREIST r 1N8NC8-l' ?29f21(t4 ZJ7', 39140 28564 21475 -1 3152 I67380

TO)lt- INTEMRNAL

1- UN3; 603l0 L9972 4775s 1041 75 353793 202870 ',22496

OFF R I TONALI;L RlJIhLMIN HT

W3R553 I Nn:C 3 I ( 30r96l t L2430 l243] 1 4060i 986 - 12440 --474091 NTIEF;Er; r Ff HRt;L-ri

(ON-RATT70S 131f 61 26,3)(,56 39980 59051 F0 0306) 1t0365s8 323013D.LOIT RLPAYMENTS ) 9955 IO16 1 1 2390 131.37 13934 kO()2?

TO IA 0155OF EF11(805NfA513F131l3 MLNM I5 12734 6 112 26423 573,73 103300 105151 335631

INTuONOL F U8ND0iOVAV I i13. I or

I NVLSITMr-NT 3 I365-i4 41 1 40 21337 46802 50485 97727 1063165

L3308] L INVLES- MI-N r

r5 L E 0sr5 8,01.'i . 54'00 0 392000 53 7000 2,309000 351000 326000 2020000REL55ASL.5 COOII 3 :0700 16 :000 232000 237000 159000 212000 132 53000rxc5rs rOF50 t172- 2000 5000 0 0 0 8727cAS/OrEVlF`1OF,ML NT 9?590 11241 7573 8301 7523 8043 52271OTFIER C3ONISrFUC3 ION o ( 0 0 0 0 0

INVESTMMrrN. 1,6.317 1 7 .1,641 611573 534301 517523 546043 3333998

DALANCE TO 33F-F- L1NoNC8 i 551 663 602301 '590236 433?499 467038 448316, 3147133

F-1NANC0 EBY

O33H3R 1O LAN]] 322443 P76256 " 333800 303705 390046 343472 19698310U0131 lY 237000 32)6,000 256001) 1134000 85000 lSOO(O t1.3'8(O

TO01AL rnmTF Irs0oUr;CES 559443 60225,6 5B90s0 407705 475O46 493472 .320)73110

5c513 Tw-:r:oEAS,Ii3 CF;1 0.3 I77.50 2 '3401 206 00031 451 56 60677

CnS3J AT D01i8NN8N()F Y3105 29963 377/41 .1/1 3/270 374/6 454834 454134

C00311 AT YEOR 580 .E7D47 .76133 372,70 37476 45404 90640 906410

COW50I9 5L I.81 1.3 1 1J 1.9 1.8 L. 3

Page 40: World Bank Documentdocuments.worldbank.org/curated/en/524781468108550568/pdf/multi-page.pdf · policy for NEA, NPC, MECO and all other utilities. NPC and NEA both report to it. The

TABLE 5.2Page 3 of 3

PHILIFPINE:S NEAF INANCIAL FORECASTS 1977 82

FOR rHE FERIODI FEGINNING JAN 1, 1977REPORT PREPARE'D MAR 1, 1978

1 2 3 4 5 61977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982

EAL-ANCE SHIEE TS

(THOUSfANDS PESOS)

ASSETS

FIXED ASSETS

EOUIrKiEVELOPMENT 4920t 60442 68015 76316 83839 91882LIESS: DEPRE.ClATION 3527 5604 7910 10473 13230 16193

OPERATING ASSEUTS 45674 54838 60105 65843 70609 75689

LOANS RECEIVABL E 13434U4 L920091 2540239 3046903 3506578 3963230

CURRLNT ASSETS

CASH 37743 37618 37270 37476 45484 90640LNVENTORIES 86453 115359 96359 89359 105359 99359

RECEIVABLES 123?1 1 1402 9290 2133 6332 5855

IOTAL t3651? 164379 142919 133968 157175 195854

IUTAL ASSETS 1525675 2139308 2743263 3246714 3734362 4234773

EQUITY ANDLIAEILi rIES

EQUITY

PAID IN CAPITAL B55214 1181214 1437214 1621214 1706214 1856214RETAINEED EARNINGS 11B60 29514 51134 74359 94764 109673

TOTAL EQUTTY 867082 1210728 1488348 1695573 1800978 1965887

LONG TERMI DEBT

DEBT DUE 653546 919848 1243123 1534438 1911347 2240885

TOTAL DUDE 653546 919848 1243123 1534438 1911347 2240885

CURRENT- LIABILITIES

PAYABLES 5047 8733 11792 16703 22037 28000

TOTAL 5047 8733 11792 16703 22037 28000

TOTAL EQUITY AN]:D- LTA.1IIIIES 1525675 2139309 2743263 3246714 3734362 4234772

DElsT , OFDrEBT F ErUTTY 43.0 43.2 45.5 47.5 51.5 53.3

CURRENr RATIO 27.0 18.8 12.1 8.0 7.1 7.0AVE INT RATE-ON LOANS REC 3.0 3.5 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.5AVE INT RATE

ON DEBT 2.7 3.4 3.7 4.3 4.7 5.(AVE COST OF-CAPITAL 1.1 1.5 1.6 2.0 2.3 2.6

Page 41: World Bank Documentdocuments.worldbank.org/curated/en/524781468108550568/pdf/multi-page.pdf · policy for NEA, NPC, MECO and all other utilities. NPC and NEA both report to it. The

- 26 -

6. ECONOMIC JUSTIFICATION

Power Demand

6.01 The load forecast prepared by the coops and NEA estimatedresidential, commercial, industrial and other power needs. Peak demandis expected to increase from , MW in 1978 to 2,469 MW by the year 2010, anaverage annual rate of about 20%; energy consumption is forecast to increasefrom 18 Gwh for 1978 to 9,870 Gwh by 2010, an average annual rate of about22%. Growth is rapid in the early years, then tapers off as all the latentdemands are satisfied. A profile of the area is given in Table 6.1.

Scope of Economic Analysis

6.02 For the purpose of the economic analysis, the eighty coops thatwill construct backbones, laterals and service drops over the next two yearswere selected as representative of the RE program as a whole. These coopsare expected to energize over one-third of the towns and villages in thePhilippines by the end of 1984.

Internal Economic Rate of Return

6.03 As a proxy for benefits, direct revenues attributable to theproject were calculated, based on the 1977 weighted average border prices perkWh paid by customers of existing cooperatives. The only indirect benefit tobe quantified was the savings that would be generated by replacing kerosenewith electricity. Since the net savings on kerosene captures only a part ofthe consumers' surplus, the benefits are considerably understated. Forecastdemand and energy consumption are shown in Table 6.2 and the 1976 sale priceby coops in Table 6.3.

6.04 Using NPC's marginal cost of power (see Table 6.4) and the incre-mental costs of investment and operation less taxes, all at 1977 borderprices, (Table 6.5) the IRR is about 22%; if demand drops by 10%, the IRRwould be 17%; if costs increase by 10%, it would be 18%.

6.05 The IRR given above is the minimum based on the benefits whichhave been quantified. Substantial additional benefits will be gained becausemost of the beneficiaries are among the lowest income groups in the country(55% are farmers and 80% live in rural areas). The coming of electricitywill mean less drudgery at home; longer working hours on farms when requiredduring peak planting and harvesting seasons; higher productivity in localindustries; increased use and improvement of schools; better water suppliesand health facilities; and a significant improvement in life style.

Page 42: World Bank Documentdocuments.worldbank.org/curated/en/524781468108550568/pdf/multi-page.pdf · policy for NEA, NPC, MECO and all other utilities. NPC and NEA both report to it. The
Page 43: World Bank Documentdocuments.worldbank.org/curated/en/524781468108550568/pdf/multi-page.pdf · policy for NEA, NPC, MECO and all other utilities. NPC and NEA both report to it. The

Table 6.1Page 1 of 3

PHILIPPINES

NATIONAL ELECTRIC ADMINISTRATION

Socio-Economic Profile of CORE area

1. No. of towns & villages 11,724

A. No. of towns 542(i) Large municipalities (average population 95,000) 36(ii) Medium municipalities (average population 36,000) 109(iii) Small municipalities (average population 15,000) 397

B. No. of villages 11,182

2. 1977 Population (million) 13.4

3. 1977 households (million) 2.2

4. 1977 labor force (million) 4.6engaged in:

(i) Agriculture 2.6(ii) Industry 0.4(iii) Other sectors 1.6

5. 1975 family expenditure (1975 US$) 800(i) Rural households 740(ii) Urban households 1,050

6. Gini coefficient: 1971 0.511975 0.55

7. Agriculture(i) Planted area ("000 ha) 3,864(ii) Irrigable area ('000 ha) 850(iii) Irrigated area ('000 ha) 360(iv) Crop Intensity, 1977 1.35(v) Fish ponds ('000 ha) 60(vi) Marshes, swampLand, inland water ('000 ha) 200(vii) Forests ('000 ha), 6,000

of which production forest (3,400)(viii) No. of farms (1971) ('000) 850(ix) Average size of farms - 1971 (ha) 3.6(x) % of farms of:

(a) less than 10 ha 61(b) 10-49 ha 25(c) 50 + ha 14

Page 44: World Bank Documentdocuments.worldbank.org/curated/en/524781468108550568/pdf/multi-page.pdf · policy for NEA, NPC, MECO and all other utilities. NPC and NEA both report to it. The

Table 6.1Page 2 of 3

(xi) Land ownership pattern (1971)(a) % of farmers who are:

(i) Full owner 58(ii) Part owner 11(iii) Tenant 29(iv) Other 2

(b) % of farm areas held by:(i) Full owner 63(ii) Part owner 11

(iii) Tenant 21(iv) Other 5

(xii) Livestock on farm ('000 head)(a) Carabao (1973) 640(b) Cattle (1973) 756(c) Hogs (1973) 3,100(d) Goat (1973) 450

(xiii) Poultry ('000 head)(a) Chicken 18,000(b) Duck 1,000

(xiv) Agricultural, fishery & forestry products (1975)

Area Production Yield('000 ha) ('000 MT) (MT/ha)

A. Agriculturea. Rough rice 1,274 2,038 1.60b. Shelled corn 1,102 925 0.84c. Rootcrops 126 646 5.13d. Fruits & nuts 143 995 6.96e. Coconut 820 656 0.80f. Sugarcane 195 1,135 6.14g. Abaca 65 48 0.74hL. Other 139 282 2.03

Total 3,864 5,725 1.48

B. F'orestry productsav. Logs (M cu m) 2.6b. Lumber ('000 bd ft) 240c. Plywood ('000 sq ft) 170d. Veneer ('000 sq ft) 130

C. F'ishery products ('000 MT) 480Fish obtained from/by:a. Commercial fishing vessels 180b. Fish ponds 40c. Municipal & other fishing vessels 260

Page 45: World Bank Documentdocuments.worldbank.org/curated/en/524781468108550568/pdf/multi-page.pdf · policy for NEA, NPC, MECO and all other utilities. NPC and NEA both report to it. The

Table 6.1Page 3 of 3

D. Livestock & poultry products ('000 MT)a. Carabao 14b. Cattle 17c. Hog 55d. Chicken 10

8. Industry

No. of industrial establishments (1972)(i) Classified by types 142,182

Logging 227Mining 279Manufacturing 16,003Utilities 248Construction 71Wholesale & retail trade 100,997Transport, storage & communications 14,997Financing, insurance, real estate & business services 970Other 8,390

(ii) Classified by size 142,182Employing 1-4 persons 133,120Employing 5-19 persons 8,198Employing 20 + persons 864

9. Education and Health(i) No. of schools 18,540

(a) Elementary 16,850(b) Secondary 1,690

(ii) No. of students ('000) 2,959(a) Elementary 2,359(b) Secondary 600

(iii) No. of teachers ('000) 103(a) Elementary 83(b) Secondary 20

(iv) No. of hospitals 265

(v) No. of hospital beds 15,000

Page 46: World Bank Documentdocuments.worldbank.org/curated/en/524781468108550568/pdf/multi-page.pdf · policy for NEA, NPC, MECO and all other utilities. NPC and NEA both report to it. The

Table 6.2: ENERGY CONSUMPTION IN CORE AREA

(GWh)

Peak Load Demand Peak

Security Total demand factor for power supplies

Year Residential Commercial Industrial Schools Hospitals Irrigation light sales (MW) (X) supplies (1MW)

1978 14 3 - - - - 1 18 6 34 22 7

1979 63 16 9 1 2 5 3 99 35 32 117 41

1980 145 33 29 3 7 14 5 236 75 36 274 87

1981 246 73 51 4 11 23 8 416 118 40 474 1351982 367 76 74 5 12 34 10 578 166 40 647 185

1983 517 101 101 7 13 45 13 797 221 41 893 2471984 696 126 129 8 13 64 16 1,052 283 42 1,178 3171985 922 152 160 11 14 65 19 1,343 353 43 1,504 3951986 1,097 183 194 11 15 75 21 1,595 416 44 1,786 4661987 1,283 216 231 13 16 83 24 L,866 482 44 2,090 540

1988 1,483 245 314 14 18 99 27 2,200 559 45 2,464 626

1989 1,696 286 362 15 19 105 29 2,512 634 45 2,813 7101990 1,925 324 412 16 20 112 33 2,842 714 45 3,183 8001991 2,172 395 469 17 21 119 35 3,228 800 46 3,615 8961992 2,429 410 529 18 23 125 38 3,572 886 46 4,001 9921993 2,708 459 593 18 24 132 40 3,974 981 46 4,451 1,0991994 3,008 496 663 19 25 139 44 4,394 1,079 46 4,921 1,2081995 3,263 526 739 20 27 145 45 4,765 1,161 47 5,337 1,300

1996 3,386 561 820 21 29 152 46 5,015 1,211 47 5,617 1,3561997 3,514 595 905 21 30 159 47 5,271 1,269 47 5,904 1,4211998 3,646 631 1,000 22 32 165 48 5,544 1,325 48 6,209 1,4841999 3,785 669 1,101 23 34 172 49 5,833 1,383 48 6,533 1,5492000 3,918 709 1,210 24 37 179 51 6,128 1,445 48 6,863 1,618

2001 4,051 747 1,327 25 39 185 51 6,425 1,505 49 7,196 1,6862002 4,193 784 1,454 26 42 193 52 6,744 1,569 49 7,553 1,7572003 4,335 823 1,587 28 43 199 53 7,068 1,637 49 7,916 1,8332004 4,403 867 1,734 29 46 205 55 7,339 1,716 49 8,220 1,9222005 4,667 910 1,888 30 49 212 56 7,812 1,789 49 8,749 2,0042006 4,813 954 2,066 31 52 218 56 8,190 1,862 50 9,173 2,0852007 4,984 1,005 2,233 32 55 255 58 8,592 1,942 50 9,623 2,1752008 5,161 1,055 2,425 34 58 232 59 9,024 2,014 51 10,107 2,2562009 5,336 1,106 2,631 35 62 238 60 9,468 2,115 51 10,604 2,3692010 5,512 1,165 2,850 37 68 245 61 9,870 2,203 51 11,054 2,469

Page 47: World Bank Documentdocuments.worldbank.org/curated/en/524781468108550568/pdf/multi-page.pdf · policy for NEA, NPC, MECO and all other utilities. NPC and NEA both report to it. The

Table 6.3: POWER SALE PRICE BY COOPS IN 1976

Power Sale Power Power Sale Power Power Sale PowerCooperatives sale proceeds cost Cooperatives sale proceeds cost Cooperatives sale proceed cost

(MWh) (P'000) (kikWh) (MWh) (P000) (J/kwh) (MWh) (P'000) (l/kWJh)

Region I 94,708 24.728 26.1 Region V 8,464 4 56.8 Region XI 7.889 3,383 42.9

Ilocos Sur 6,198 2,205 35.6 Albay 6,796 3,727 54.8 Davao Sur 1,289 1,336 96.5La Union 10,951 3,408 31.1 Catanduanes 1,645 1,065 64.7 Surigao Sur I 6,476 1,933 29.9Abra 2,581 925 35.8 Sorsogon 23 16 69.6 Davao del Norte 124 114 91.9Benguet 74,978 18,210 24.3

Region VI 17.350 10,287 59.3 Region XII 14,611 2,877 19.7

Region II 2.188 1,952 89.2 Aklan 849 551 64.9 Lanao Sur 6,386 832 13.0Isabela 1,773 1,660 93.6 Capiz 3,882 2,571 66.2 Lanao Norte 4,922 956 19.4Cagayan 415 292 70.4 Negros Occ.I 9,679 5,068 52.4 Sapang Palay 3,303 1,089 33.0

C Negros 2,940 2,097 71.3Region III 103,560 34,679 33.5 GRAND TOTAL 334,937 123,658 36.9

First Cavite 32,791 10,183 31.1 Region VII 1,422 716 50.4 (41 Coops)Nueva Ecija 1 14,686 5,574 38.0 Bohol 1 1,273 582 45.7Nueva Ecija II 4,121 2,091 50.7 Cebu I 149 134 89.9 Regional Summary

Zambales 13,754 3,942 28.7 wt.(%)First Bulacan 14,351 5,191 36.2 Region VIII 13,648 9,806 71.9 1 Luzon 41.1 247,532 82,426 33.3

'3ataan 23,857 7,698 32.3 W. Samar 1 420 374 89.1 2 Visayas 31.2 32,420 20,809 64.2W. Samar II 1,643 1,181 71.9 3 Mindanao 27.7 54,985 20,423 37.1

Region IV 38.612 16,239 42.1 Leyte Sur 206 253 122.8First Cavite 22,327 8,065 36.1 Leyte II 11,379 7,998 70.3 Overall weighted average rate,Laguna I 9,194 2,980 32.4 1976 44.0Mindoro Or. I 2,733 1,977 72.3 Region IX 20.220 12,671 62.7 Overall weighted average rate,Mindoro Occ. I 576 504 87.5 Zambonga 1977 prices 47.1Palawan 1,271 1,213 95.4 City 20,220 12,671 62.7 Overall weighted average rate,Quezon II 924 467 50.5 1977 border prices 40.0Marinduque 431 335 77.7 Region X 12,265 1,492 12.2RLzal I (Talim) 1,156 698 60.4 Misamis Or. 12,265 1,492 12.2

Source: Information provided by NEA.

Page 48: World Bank Documentdocuments.worldbank.org/curated/en/524781468108550568/pdf/multi-page.pdf · policy for NEA, NPC, MECO and all other utilities. NPC and NEA both report to it. The

'rable 6.4: NPC'S MARGINAL COST OF POWER SUPPLY TO

CO-OPS AT 1977 BORDER PRICES

Units Luzon Visayas Mindanao Philippines /b

1. Present value of:/a

1.1 Investment cost, Sum billionof the years 1978-87 P 14.3 3.4 7.8

1.2 Increase ir operatingcost over 1977:

(i) Sum of the years billion1978-87 P 3.9 2.8 1.9

(ii) Sum of the years billion1978-2010 p 7.5 4.9 3.5

1.3 Increase in peakenergy over 1977:

(1) Sum of the years1978-87 OW 5.2 1.8 3.2

(ii) Sum of the years

1978-2010 GW 10.0 3.5 6.31.4 Annual increase in

peak energy supply,sum of the years1978-87 GW 1.1 0.4 0.7

1.5 Increase in powersales over 1977,sum of the years1978-87 GWh 31.6 11.3 19.5

Ii. Unit Cost of Power Supply

2.1 Operating cost(1.2,ii+ 3,ii) P/kW 748 1,415 558 903

2.2 Opportunity cost ofcapital (12% of1.1 divided by 1.4) -P/kW 1,528 1,023 1,314 1,312

2.3 Marginal cost(2.1 + 2.2) P/kW 2,276 2,438 1,872 2,215

2.4 Power load:(i) In percentages, % 69.7 71.1 70.5 70.4

1.5t (1.3,i x 8766)(ii) In kwh kWh 6,110 6,233 6,180 6,168

2.5 Marginal cost centavos/(2.3+ 2.4,ii): kWh 37.2 39.1 30.3 35.9

2.6 Off-peak marginal cost2.1 + 2.4,ii 12.2 22.7 9.0 14.6

2.7 Peak marginal costs(2.7,ii + 2.7,iii): 80.9 67.8 67.5 73.1

(i) Peak demand in eachkw unit of power kWh 2,224 2,269 2,250 2,245supply, (36.4%/cof 2.4, ii)

(ii) Investment cost( centavos/2.2i- 2.7,i) kWh 68.7 45.1 58.5 58.5

(iii) Current cost. "(2.6) 12.2 22.7 9.0 14.6

/a At 12% annual discount rate, at border prices.

/b Based on regional weights of 41.1% for Luzon, 31.2% for Visayas and 27.2% forMindanao.

/c 36.4% of tne present value of projected sales (1978-2010) by the80 co-ops in CORE area are for peak demand and 63.6% foroff peak demand.

Source: Information provided by NPC and NEA.

Page 49: World Bank Documentdocuments.worldbank.org/curated/en/524781468108550568/pdf/multi-page.pdf · policy for NEA, NPC, MECO and all other utilities. NPC and NEA both report to it. The

Table 6.5: INVESTMENT AND OPERATING COSTS OF THE 80 COOPS IN CORE

(in P million at 1977 prices)

Current Cost

Electrical No. of Cost of Customer acentg

Investment system assets customers Customer accntg purchased and O&M at

Year cost at end of ea. yr. ('000) & gen. admin. O&M power border prices Total

------------------------ At domestic prices ----------------------- ------ At border prices ---------

1978 292 292 93 4 6 8 8 16

1979 412 704 298 12 14 42 22 64

1980 260 964 522 21 19 98 34 132

1981 187 1,151 748 30 23 170 45 215

1982 187 1,337 974 39 27 232 56 288

1983 186 1,523 1,199 48 30 320 67 387

1984 187 1,710 1,425 57 34 423 78 501

1985 155 1,865 1,651 66 37 540 88 628

1986 154 2,019 1,876 75 40 641 98 739

1987 154 2,174 2,101 84 43 750 108 858

1988 154 2,328 2,326 93 47 884 119 1,003

1989 154 2,482 2,550 102 50 1,000 129 1,138

1990 154 2,635 2,774 III 53 1,142 139 1,281

1991 154 2,789 2,998 120 56 1,297 149 1,446

1992 154 2,943 3,223 129 59 1,436 160 1,596

1993 154 3,097 3,447 138 62 1,597 170 1,767

1994 147 3,244 3,661 146 65 1,766 170 1,936

1995 58 3,301 3,745 150 66 1,915 183 2,098

1996 56 3,358 3,827 154 67 2,015 187 2,202

1997 56 3,414 3,910 156 68 2,118 191 2,309

1998 59 3,473 3,996 160 69 2,228 195 2,423

1999 60 3,533 4,083 163 71 2,344 199 2,543

2000 74 3,606 4,164 iF' 72 2,462 203 2,665

2001 74 3,680 4,246 170 74 2,582 207 2,789

2002 76 3,756 4,329 173 75 2,710 211 2,921

2003 78 3,834 4,414 177 77 2,840 215 3,055

2004 83 3,918 4,501 180 78 2,949 220 3,169

2005 75 3,993 4,579 183 80 3,139 224 3,363

2006 77 4,070 4,660 186 81 3,291 228 3,519

2007 79 4,149 4,741 190 83 3,453 232 3,685

2008 78 4,227 4,824 193 85 3,626 236 3,362

2009 89 4,316 4,910 196 86 3,805 240 4,045

2010 79 4,396 4,987 199 88 3,966 244 4,210

Because of roundings figures may not add up.

Page 50: World Bank Documentdocuments.worldbank.org/curated/en/524781468108550568/pdf/multi-page.pdf · policy for NEA, NPC, MECO and all other utilities. NPC and NEA both report to it. The
Page 51: World Bank Documentdocuments.worldbank.org/curated/en/524781468108550568/pdf/multi-page.pdf · policy for NEA, NPC, MECO and all other utilities. NPC and NEA both report to it. The

- 27 -

7. SUMMARY OF AGREEMENTS

7.01 During negotiations agreement was reached on the following:

(a) NEA would continue to exercise franchising powers (para. 1.03).

(b) NEA would form a planning unit (para 2.05).

(c) Government with Bank assistance will review NEA's audit procedures(para. 2.07).

(d) An information section will be established in the plannng unit(para. 2.08).

(e) Annual income statements and balance sheets of each cooperativewould be certified by auditors acceptable to the Bank beginningwith the year ending December 31, 1978 (para 2.12).

(f) Cooperatives would hold insurance coverage satisfactory to the Bank(para 2.16).

(g) NEA will plan to reduce cooperatives' power losses to a 12% averageby the end of 1982 (para 3.10).

(h) NEA would follow and endeavor to cause cooperatives to follow thefinancial policies outlined in Annex 3 (para. 5.21).

Page 52: World Bank Documentdocuments.worldbank.org/curated/en/524781468108550568/pdf/multi-page.pdf · policy for NEA, NPC, MECO and all other utilities. NPC and NEA both report to it. The

NATIONAL ELECTRIFICATION ADMINISTRATIONORGANIZATION CHART - 1977

BOARD OF

|ADMIINISTRATORS BOR SEHT lA1

ADMINISTRATORS

;PECIA I I I.A . I A.GiE.M11NTOFF CE OF THE PROJECT LOCAL ASITAC ROGRAM CONTROL PULCRLATIONS SPECIAL STUDIES UALFE

CORP AUDITOR P~~ROCURFMENT TASK GROUP OEFICE TAFFTAINGOFC

FISHIRMEN'S F ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ELECTR IC MICRO HYDRO

ASST PROCRAM RN NG ~~~~~~~~~~~~OOF MUJTUAL LI ENERGlY

OF ICE ~~~~~~~~~PROTFCTION FUND RE SEARCH OFFIC

|DEP ADMINISTRATOR ||DFP ADMINISTRATOR ||DEP ADMINISTRATOF FOR ADM & COOP DEV FOR ENG'G & MATL'S ||FINANCE & FRANCHIS~ES||

DIRECTO RATE FOR DIRECTORATE FOH DIRFCTORATE FOR l l DIRECTORATE FOR DIRECTORATE FOR DIRLCTORATE FOR DIRECtORATE FORADMINISTRATION _COOP DEVELOPMENT _ ENGINEERING L EQPT & MATL'S FINANCE FREUANCISES OF DOOPCPOWFF'OSE

REGULATION OF COOP POWVF, USE

PERSONNEI COOP INFO FEASIBILITY RFCEIVING & LOANS SUPFR RATES AND FINANCE l

DIVISION DIVISION STUDIES DIV CONTROL DIV VISION DIV EVALUATION DIV DIVISION

D GEN SERVICES l j COOP ORG A j A &FE AND MATEL l | WAREHOUSE & I NANCIAL PLAONTROL l FRANCHISING NRAING & PROGl DIVISION l 1 DIVISION l 1 PROCUREMENT DIV l g SHIPPING DIV NN & CIVISONTROL DIVISION SUPPORT DIV

J CORPORATE l j TRAININ CONSTRUCI ION l | EXCESSPROPERTY BORROWERS PLANNING & JECT

LEGAL COUNSEL l 1 DIVISION DI1 [)lVISION 1 5DIVISION DVNRESEARCH DIV VOFVISIO

OPLERATiONS J i OPERONS NS l i DIVISION C < EMM ETATION

Wrdd Rk 1B12S

Page 53: World Bank Documentdocuments.worldbank.org/curated/en/524781468108550568/pdf/multi-page.pdf · policy for NEA, NPC, MECO and all other utilities. NPC and NEA both report to it. The

ANNEX 2Page 1 of 2

PHILIPPINES

NATIONAL ELECTRIFICATION ADMINISTRATION

Assumptions in Financial Forecasts, dated March 19 1978

A. NEA

1. Coops Interest: is assumed at 2.75% for existing loans and firstloans to coops and at 5% thereafter. Interest for diesel equipment from theFrench loan at the amount paid; coops receiving these loans will pay equiva-lent terms.

2. Other Revenue Items: are as estimated by NEA including procurementfees at 2% through 1978 and 3% thereafter.

3. Operations: costs of operations are as forecast by NEA on thebroad assumption that costs currently borne by NEA will be passed to coops.

4. Depreciation: depreciation for all equipment is on the straightline method at 10% for most of the equipment including transport and 6.75%for Other Property and Equipment. Development expenditure is being writtenoff over 40 years.

5. Debt Service: is based on the individual loans borrowed or assumedto be borrowed by NEA. Interest financed for coop loans is as estimated by NEA.Interest financed for loans borrowed is assumed for sources that usually financeinterest during grace.

6. Loans and Investments: are as estimated by NEA based on materialsand cash required by the coops to carry out the program.

7. Borrowings: are amounts estimated to be required for the foreigncosts of equipment and materials and interest financed during the graceperiods on certain loans.

8. Equity: is assumed at the amounts necessary to cover the financegap and provide adequate working cash.

9. Current Assets: receivables have been estimated in detail for eachitem making up the receivables. Inventories are as estimated by NEA asrequired to meet the program.

10. Current Liabilities: payables have been estimated at one month'soperating, one month's loan releases, and three month's interest.

Page 54: World Bank Documentdocuments.worldbank.org/curated/en/524781468108550568/pdf/multi-page.pdf · policy for NEA, NPC, MECO and all other utilities. NPC and NEA both report to it. The

ANNEX 2Page 2 of 2

B. Cooperatives

1. Energy sales for each cooperative have been forecast based on theplanned connections of towns, villages and consumers, and the estimated loadsand Kwh sales they will generate.

2. Revenues except for Pampanga and Benguet which are based on an 8%rate of return, are forecast at the levels necessary to cover cash operatingexpenses and cash operating expenses plus 15%, 25%, 35% and 50% of the sixthyear's debt service for the first five years of operation respectively, andto earn a rate of return of 8% in the tenth year of operation.

3. Operating Expenses

(a) Power Purchases have been taken at NPC's forecast price perKwh purchased.

(b) Operating Expenses have been predicted at 4% of gross plantfor operating and maintenance, P 40 (the 1977 average) per consumer escalatedat 7% p.a. for administration and 1% of revenue for bad debts.

(c) Depreciation has been taken at 3% p.a. of gross plant.

4. Interest and Amortization are based on currently agreed and assumedloans from NEA.

5. Construction Expenditure has been based on estimates of the costof installation of equipment, lines, and plant required for the villages,towns and consumers forecast for connection. Work-in-progress has beenestimated at 15% of construction expenditure 1977-79 and 10% thereafter.

6. Plant in Service has been revalued at 7% p.a.

7. Receivables were estimated at two month's revenue.

8. Payables have been forecast at one month's power or fuel purchase,one month's operating, 5% of construction and 25% of interest.

Page 55: World Bank Documentdocuments.worldbank.org/curated/en/524781468108550568/pdf/multi-page.pdf · policy for NEA, NPC, MECO and all other utilities. NPC and NEA both report to it. The

ANNEX 3Page 1 of 2

PHILIPPINES

NATIONAL ELECTRIFICATION ADMINISTRATION

Stet'ment of Policy

1. It is NEA's policy to conduct its operations, arrange to obtainloan and equity funds, and to lend or otherwise provide funds to borrowersunder circumstances reasonably designed to ensure that: (i~ adequate workingcapital and cash levels are maintained; (ii) operating expeases and interestpayable shall not exceed 90% of operating revenues; and (iii) cash generationincluding operating income, depreciation and loan repayments shall be at least1.2 times annual debt service. To that end, NEA will prepare and implementfinancial plans annually for the current and following nine years which areconsistent with the achievement of these objectives.

2. NEA recognizes that cooperatives should be expected to have earningssufficient to cover operating expenses, debt service and other needs such asmeeting part of the requirements for development from internally generatedfunds. In the interests of achieving appropriate allocation of Philippineresources for development, NEA intends to exert its best efforts to havecooperatives fix and charge tariffs to consumers at levels that will recoverthe economic costs of supplying power as soon as possible after commencingcommercial operations. Consistent with these criteria, NEA shall follow theguidelines set out in its Policy Bulletin 401-A which provides that cooperativesearn revenues sufficient to cover cash operating expenses for the first year ofoperations, and for the second through fifth years, to cover cash operatingexpenses and 15%, 25%, 35% and 50%, respectively, of the sixth year's debtservice on the initial loan Erom NEA to the cooperatives, which provides fundsfor the first stage in a cooperative's development, generally coveringpurchase of assets from existing utilities and/or the backbone distributionsystem, including a few initial laterals.

3. In deciding how much lending to provide for subsequent developmentof a cooperative and how much the cooperative should be expected to providefor this purpose from internally generated funds, and in determining theterms (interest rate, grace period on repayment, and repayment period) ofsuch financing, NEA will be guided by the principle that cooperatives shouldachieve as soon as possible after the fifth and not later than the tenth yearof commercial operation, an annual overall rate of return of 8% on revaluednet fixed assets in operation. It is currently NEA's policy to make initialloans to cooperatives on the following terms: (a) 30 years, including fiveyears of grace, with interest at 3% p.a., for those cooperatives connected tothe grid of the National Power Corporation (NPC); and (b) 35 years, includingfive years of grace, with interest at 2% p.a., for those that self-generate.However, it is NEA's policy to make second and subsequent loans to thecooperatives on terms with the period of repayment not greater than and theinterest rate not lower than: (a) 25 years, including five years of grace,

Page 56: World Bank Documentdocuments.worldbank.org/curated/en/524781468108550568/pdf/multi-page.pdf · policy for NEA, NPC, MECO and all other utilities. NPC and NEA both report to it. The

ANNEX 3Page 2 of 2

with interest at 3% p.a., for those connected to the NPC grid, and (b) 30years, including five years of grace, with interest at 2% p.a., for thosethat self-generate. NEA plans in the future to reduce repayment terms andincrease interest charges commensurate with NEA's cost of capital and withthe increasng capacity of the cooperatives to service debt on harder terms.

4. Studies will be undertaken of the financial circumstances ofcooperatives and the merits of merger, federation and varied lending terms aspossible means to avoid extremely large variations in electricity tariffs indifferent rural localities.

For the purposes of this Policy Statement:

(i) "debt service requirement" shall be the aggregate amount of amorti-zation (including sinking fund payments, if any), interest andother charges on debt;

(ii) "operating revenues" for NEA shall be gross operating revenue fromall sources; and operating expenses shall be all expenses chargeablein the annual income statement, excluding interest;

(iii) the annual rate of return shall be calculated by dividing thecooperative's net operating income for the Fiscal Year in questionby one-half of the sum of the current net value of the cooperative'sfixed assets in service at the beginning and at the end of thatFiscal Year, expressed as a percentage;

(iv) the term "net operating income" means gross revenues from allsources related to the cooperative's electricity operations lessall expenses of electricity operations, including administration,adequate maintenance and taxes or any payments in lieu of taxes,and provision for depreciation. Interest and other charges on debtare not considered to be operating expenses for the purposes ofdetermining said net operating income; and

(v) the term "current net value of the cooperative's fixed assets inservice" means the gross value of the cooperative's fixed assets inservice less the amount of accumulated depreciation and consumerscontributions, all valued annually in accordance with agreedindices or other means of valuation acceptable to the Bank.

Page 57: World Bank Documentdocuments.worldbank.org/curated/en/524781468108550568/pdf/multi-page.pdf · policy for NEA, NPC, MECO and all other utilities. NPC and NEA both report to it. The

ANNEX 4Page 1

PHILIPPINES

RURAL ELECTRIFICATION PROJECT

Related Documents and Data Available in the Project File

A. General reports and documents related to the sector and the Borrower

1. NEA Annual reports 1972-1976

2. Various NEA internal monthly reports

3. IBRD appraisal report 1552-PH. The Seventh Power Project, May 1977

4. Impact of Rural Electrification in the Moresco Area, 1975

5. An Evaluative Study of the Misamis Oriental Rural Electric ServiceCooperative, Inc. (MORESCO), March 1976

6. Load forecast for MECO from 1977-1982, October 4, 1977

7. Power expansion program for Luzon Grid, NPC, August 1977

B. General reports and documents related to the rural electrification program

1. Rural Electrification V, Project Paper, USAID, June 1977

2. Rural Electrification Loan, Capital Assistance Paper - USAID - February 1972

3. Notes of Rural Electrification Program 1978-1980, NEA, September 1977

4. Construction Administrative Procedures - NEA

5. Specifications and drawings for 7.62/13.2 KV Line Construction - NEA

6. Specifications and drawings for 34.5 KV and 69 KV Transmission LineConstruction - NEA

C. Appraisal Working Papers

1. Integrated Luzon Grid Hlistorical Data

2. Rural Electrification P'rogram, 1978-80

3. Schedule of Construction - 69 kV Transmission Lines

4. Details of Individual Subprojects

Page 58: World Bank Documentdocuments.worldbank.org/curated/en/524781468108550568/pdf/multi-page.pdf · policy for NEA, NPC, MECO and all other utilities. NPC and NEA both report to it. The

ANNEX 4Page 2

5. Financial Forecasts - Pampanga

6. "i - Benguet

7. if it - La Union

8. " - Ilocos Norte

9. " - Catanduanes

10. NEA Debt Schedules

11. A Profile of CORE Area

12. Comparative Costs of Kerosene Lamps and Electric Lights

13. Main Features of Farms in the Philippines

14. Power Demand in CORE Area

15. Power Supply Cost

16. Coops Estimated Cost of Power Distribution, 1976

17. Investment Schedule of 80 Coops in CORE Area

18. Alternative Methods of Estimating Current Cost

19. CORE's IRR

Page 59: World Bank Documentdocuments.worldbank.org/curated/en/524781468108550568/pdf/multi-page.pdf · policy for NEA, NPC, MECO and all other utilities. NPC and NEA both report to it. The

IBRD 13281tio- 12s' JANUARY i978

CLASSIFICATION OF ELECTRIC COOPERATIVES

BY GEOGRAPHICAL REGIONS PHILIPPINES

R-~G10fN I REG!ON Vii 20°

1L oCos Norte CENTRALVISAYAS National Electrification Administration (NEA)1. Aboco 42. Cebu I - Cebu II2. Abra ~~~~~~~Cebu III -Cebu IV 8RUA ELC IFATO POJ T3. Ilocos Sur 43. Negros Oriental I RURAL ElECTRIFICATION PROJECT4. Mt. Provinc *Negros BOrintl 115. La Union 44 Bohof I - Bohol ti6. Benguet4. 7. Pangasinan I 4 Siquior

Pangasinan It REGION VIII --- Provincll boundoriesCentral Pangasinan EASTERN VISAYAS Ro

R.EGtON 11 46. Northern Samrar egional boundariesCAGAYAN VALLEY 47. W Samar I

B. Batanes ~~W.Samar 11S. Satane5 48. E. Samar I

Cagayan i 49. Leyte I - Leyte IV IKalinga-Apayso Leyte III- Leyte IV -Aparr10. Kuig-pyoLeyte V - Leyte VI '

I. Isabela f I 50. Southern Leyte 5 I 9

1Z Ifugao REGION IX

14. Quirino WESTERN MINDANAO51. Zamboanga del Norte 2f 10 / - - 01o0 20o 300 400

CENTRAL LUZON Zamboanga del Sur 1I1(Kloner15. Nueva Ecija 1 53. Basilan Kiloeters1 Nueva Ecija 11 54. Sulu16. Tarlac 55. TaWi-Tavdvi 0 50 100 150 200 25017. Zambales R EG IONX19. Bulacan I NORTHERN MINDANAO ' 5- Miles

Bulacan It 56. SuriQas del Norte , J .J .20 Bataan 57. Camiguin , ' \ 14 i

S&. A=nndel Norte ~ N REGION IV 59. Muans OrientatalSOUTHERN TAGALOC Misamis Oriental 11

21 Quezon f 60. Misamis Ocidental IQu Oezon It Miamis Occidental 11 Vi.Ocezon II 63 Bukidnonl i 6 I1 OQuezon IIl Eukidnon 11

22. Rizaf bA4. Agusan del Sur \ IRizal II 6.Agusan del Norte7

23. Canie Agusandel Norte . t24. Laguna I REGION Xl- '>8 r I 21

Laguna 11 EASTERN MINDANAO )2225. Batangasl 20

Batangas 11 65. Surigao del Sur IT MXNILAc, "uezopn CtyBatangas Ill Saritao del Sur it ,

26 M =rindunque 67. Cot>ibato I27 MindoroOrientall Cotabato II 5 3

Mindoro Oriental 11 68. Davao Norte 2\ 28. Mindoro Occidental 69. Davao Oriental -> y 9--29. Romablan - Lubong 70. Davao del Sur . 3230. Palamn REGION XII 33

REGION V SOUTHERN MINDANAO E2 \ \ - ,BICOL 61 Lanao del Norte .. 37 \L

31. Camarines Norte 62 Lanao de Sur,432. Camarines Sur I 66 Maguindana- 2 - I--.

Camarines Sur II~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~nCamarines Sarl1 71. Sultan KudaratICamarinen Eur IVI 72. South Cotabato . 28

33. Catanduanes34. Albay .I29< '6-4635. Sornogan I /

eionsogan If . 3' , \k" / 47 1'36. M a sbate 4

REGION Vi ' 48WESTERN VISAYAS I V _

37. Aklan ."3 /

38. Capiz39. Anfique V * ( n40. IloilolI

lloito 1 1 \ *\< ) *391 40 -_ 49Iloilo IV

41. Negros Occidental I ' 'loilo ° l ' Negros Occidental It : 50Negros Occidental lil ' . ; -

0/ °Ce , V 6 - 'l

*lo- * -/ / /o . -w .S15 o

14 5T, 36/ .

-. ./1 ra~ 64

. : 45-2-~~~~~~~~~~~/1.\ (1- 44>

N~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~5 lfl J °t6 5

' Io

.... Zamboanga, .5. - g .' 66 .- / E4Va;~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ r 62- t / '-

L UZON I Xi

'PHiLfPPINES 0x' 1 ' :

, ~~~~~~VISA KA Sf5- J 2 n

VIET NAM _ -

MfiNDA NAG

BRUN El"- -

MALAYSIA 5I

of thmrodv-of ft rIVo- n Mih i is 800,c Akec d1ei-1om-naeih, o m-d Ikd thkoiolostt,o hlo m- do -t -plY. oil hk p-n f i Woildsk SnPml itS

I N D 0 N ES IA _ af i.h.e y mmrt on in pCi otot t 0ev po,y o' th^ doroame or 2... . > - -: - ~~~~~ ~~~~~~120' cpne,uhhnvvet 12,5 ,


Recommended