Date post: | 18-Jan-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | edward-taylor |
View: | 217 times |
Download: | 0 times |
www.pegasus.lse.ac.uk
Agility, Improvisation, or Enacted Emergence?
Dr Yingqin Zheng, Dr Will Venters, Dr Tony Cornford
This research was undertaken as part of PegasusEPSRC: Grant No: EP/D049954/1www.pegasus.lse.ac.uk
10 Dec 2007 ICIS, Montreal
www.pegasus.lse.ac.uk
Introduction
Pegasus Project – Exploring practices of GridPP: the UK particle physics Grid
Agile systems development?
Methodology as faked? Fiction? Amethodical?
Organisational improvisation
Improvisation Paradoxes
Enacted Emergence?
www.pegasus.lse.ac.uk
Organizational Improvisation
Metaphors Jazz (Weick 1992, 1999; Barrett 1998, Hatch 1999) Improvisational Theatre (Crossan, 1998)
Cunha (1999): “the conception of action as it unfolds, by an organisation and/or its members drawing on available material, cognitive, affective and social resources”
Convergence in time of conception and execution Bricolage – finding solutions from available rather than optimal
resources
www.pegasus.lse.ac.uk
Improvisation Paradoxes
SituatedImprovisation
environmental turbulence task uncertainty
unplanned-for occurrences task complexity drop your tools
visions
(Moorman and Miner, 1998, Ciborra, 1996); (Dahlbom and Mathiassen, 1993)(Miner et al., 2001) (Hutchins, 1995, Weick and Roberts, 1993)(Weick, 1993a)(Hatch, 1999, Mintzberg and McHugh, 1985,
Hutchins, 1991, Weick, 1993b)
Structured Chaos
organized anarchyPersistent structures
collateral structureexperimental culture
aesthetic of imperfectiona sense of urgency
(Cohen et al., 1972)(Lanzara, 1999)(Cunha et al., 1999)(Cunha et al., 1999)(Weick, 1999) (Crossan, 1998, Hutchins, 1991,Mirvis,1998)
Planned Agility
convergence of planning & execution
plan to improvise mixing the pre-composed &
the spontaneousmagnetic fieldsartful planning
(Moorman and Miner, 1998)
(Miner et al., 2001)(Weick, 1998)
(Weick, 1993a)(Baskerville, 2006)
www.pegasus.lse.ac.uk
Improvisation-Paradoxes Cont.
Reflective Spontaneity
retrospective sense-making
ex post interpretation transient constructs
emergent order
(Weick, 1993b)
(Lanzara, 1999) (Lanzara, 1999)(Miner et al 2001)
Collective Individuality(Mirvis, 1998)
facilitative leadership trust and kinship
fluid communication influence and persuasion
hanging out
(Crossan, 1998) (Crossan, 1998, Weick, 1993a) (Orlikowski, 1996, Miner et al., 2001)(Hatch, 1999)(Barrett, 1998)
Anxious Confidence
(Mirvis, 1998)
moodsindividual skills &
creativity formative context
organizational memory
(Ciborra, 2002)(Hutchins, 1991, Moorman and Miner, 1998, Orlikowski, 1996) (Ciborra and Lanzara, 1994) (Moorman and Miner, 1998)
www.pegasus.lse.ac.uk
Particle Physicists and Grids
Currently constructing the worlds most powerful particle accelerator… the Large Hadron Collider (LHC)
Searching for Higgs Boson – “1 person in 1000 worlds, or a needle in 20 million haystacks”
12-14 million gigabytes per year.
100,000 CPUs.
40PB disk, 40PB tape.
“Worlds biggest Grid“
CD stack with1 year LHC data(~ 20 km)
www.pegasus.lse.ac.uk
Background Context
Building the LHC Computing Grid (LCG):
Highly distributed, complex and poorly defined systems development task.
Cutting edge hardware and software used.
New software standards being negotiated.
Middleware and support software being developed in a range of languages.
Grid must be distributed and proceed at different paces because of funding.
Particle physics has a long tradition of such large scale global collaborations (Traweek 1988).
GridPP (UK Contribution to LCG) To a significant degree agile…
Collaboration of 230 people in 19 UK universities, RAL and CERN.
Decisions are made democratically and consensually, and implemented
by influence and persuasion.
Network rather than hierarchy
Virtual, federated, overlapping and inter-connected.
Virtual meetings, wikis, blogs, mailinglists
www.pegasus.lse.ac.uk
Research Findings
Situated Improvisation
EGEE, LCG, e-science, funding, hardware, software…
Structured Chaos No top down authority; extensive management structure/communicative channels; competing technical solutions
Planned Agility “day to day we keep putting one foot in front of the other … and different people, depending on their role in the project, are more oriented towards the ultimate goal or more oriented towards the little concrete footsteps that need to be taken...”
Reflective Spontaneity
-pragmatic, “getting the job done”, fire-fighting
-monitoring, accounting, sense-making
Collective Individuality
-freedom to improvise and innovate
-shared goal, trust, facilitative leadership, “hanging out”
Anxious Confidence -pressure from LHC switch on; “Yes it will work.”
-history of cutting-edge computing and large collaborations
www.pegasus.lse.ac.uk
Enacted Emergence
Enactment (Weick 1977) “people invent organizations and their environments and these
inventions reside in ideas that participants have superimposed on any stream of experience (ibid. p. 196)”.
Emergence Temporally emergent qualities Interactions of existing elements In a historical context
The evolutionary approach of system development (Dahlbom and Mathiassen 1993)
Enactment of sensemaking
www.pegasus.lse.ac.uk
Enacted Emergence
EnvironmentComplexity, uncertainties, visions,
pressure, risks
Historyorganizational memory of improvisation,
history of innovation,
Chaos
trial and error, improvisation, bricolage
Order
continuity, stability, resilience
Individualscompetent, confident, creative, committed,
pragmatic
Collectiveshared goal, trust, hanging out, emotional bond, facilitative leadership, aesthetic of
imperfection
Planningbroad direction, retrospective sense-
makingsensemaking
Unfoldingdemocratic debates, spontaneous actions,
natural selection
Practicestinkering, innovation, invention
Structurecollateral, de-layered, democratic,
communicative
www.pegasus.lse.ac.uk
Contributions
Improvisation paradoxes Agility should embody a deliberate or natural mixture
of structure and improvisation, order and changes, intentionality and flexibility, spontaneity and reflexivity, collectivity and individuality
Agile systems development “in the wild” Embeddedness of agility Large group performance is possible when the
ambience is right. Science vs art
Enacted Emergence Duality between structure and agency