Date post: | 29-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | cuthbert-gibson |
View: | 212 times |
Download: | 0 times |
www.skope.ox.ac.uk
Room at the top – and the bottom, too: the winners and losers in the
"hourglass" labour market
Craig Holmes and Ken Mayhew
Education and Employers Taskforce research conference 2011, Warwick University, October 12th 2011
www.skope.ox.ac.uk
Introduction
• The idea that there has been a growth in high-wage, high-skill jobs in the UK has been an attractive one for policymakers:
“There is…evidence that the demand for skilled workers is currently outstripping supply, which suggests there is 'room at the top' for highly qualified graduates from all backgrounds.” (HM Government, 2011, p. 11)
• However, there is debate about the cause of this:– Technology, particularly ICT capital, is a key factor– Jobs may be complementary or substitutable with technical
innovation
www.skope.ox.ac.uk
Introduction
• Two views:• Skill-biased technical change
– Computer capital take-up increases firm demand for skilled workers and replaces unskilled workers
• Routinisation hypothesis (Autor, Levy and Murnane, 2003):– Computer capital replaces tasks, not skills– Labour employed in routine tasks can be swapped for technology– Occupations performing non-routine tasks grow
• Polarisation hypothesis (Goos and Manning, 2007)– Routine occupations found in middle of income distribution– Non-routine occupations found at top and bottom of distribution
www.skope.ox.ac.uk
Introduction
• The full implications of a polarised (or ‘hourglass’) labour market for mobility have generally been ignored:– Focus is on the ‘room at the top’.– Opportunities to progress providing individuals have the right skills
(increasingly, graduate qualifications)– Little said about the inevitable ‘room at the bottom’
• Crawford et al (2011):“attempting to move individuals from the bottom to the middle of the skill/income distribution may be harder, as there are fewer jobs in the middle”
Solution: increase supply of skilled workers, so that firms are encouraged to upskill low-wage jobs
www.skope.ox.ac.uk
Introduction
• The hourglass labour market does not solely create opportunities and “winners”
• Three groups of potential “losers”:– Those displaced from routine jobs– New entrants who would previously have gone into routine jobs– Those in low wage jobs
• Evidence that polarisation is more obvious in occupations than in wages
Are the apparent “winners” actually winning much?
www.skope.ox.ac.uk
Data
• National Child Development Study (NCDS)– Members all born in a single week in March 1958– Use waves 1981, 1991, 1999-2000, 2004-5– Data covers age 23 to age 46-7– N = 10-12,000 in each wave
• British Cohort Study (BCS)– Members all born in a single week in April 1970.– Use waves 1996, 1999, 2004, 2008– Data covers age 25 to age 38– N = 9,000 in each wave
www.skope.ox.ac.uk
Data
• Occupations coded in KOS (1981) SOC90 (1991, 1999) and SOC2000 (2004).– Manually converted to SOC2000 based on occupation descriptions– Reduced to 3 digit coding to reduce dropped observations
• Occupations placed into one of six groups:– Professional, managerial, intermediate, routine, service, manual non-
routine– Allocation based on description, wages and wider economy
employment changes– Managerial and intermediate are both higher skill, non-routine
occupations without high qualification entry requirements– Manual non-routine and service are both low skill non-routine
occupations.
www.skope.ox.ac.uk
Methodology
• Displaced workers:– Logit model for transitions between occupational groups over 5-year
periods (using NCDS 1981-2004)– Career moves separated out displacement using measure of decline in
routine jobs across whole economy– Effect of displacement interacted with qualifications
• New entrants– Logit model on occupational group at start of data, across both
cohorts– Effects of qualifications, cohort and interactions
www.skope.ox.ac.uk
Methodology
• Occupational mobility and wages– Wage deciles in destination occupational groups (NCDS: 1991, 1999
and 2004)– OLS regression of decile on educational attainment and occupation at
start of period
www.skope.ox.ac.uk
Results: displaced workers
• Career effects separated from displacement– Some qualifications increase mobility from routine jobs to
intermediate, managerial and professional occupations– Vocational qualifications below level 4 have little effect– Academic qualifications at level 3 do not improve mobility over level 2
• Experience in routine jobs decreases mobility• Age • Decline in routine jobs increases transitions both upwards
and, to an extent, downwards– Effects are mitigated by qualification levels
www.skope.ox.ac.uk
Results: displaced workersLevel 0-1 Academic Level 2-3 Academic Level 4-5 Academic
0% DISP
10% DISP
Effect of
DISP
0% DISP
10% DISP
Effect of
DISP
0% DISP
10% DISP
Effect of
DISP
PROFESSIONAL 0.5% 0.7% 0.2% 0.8% 1.4% 0.6% 3.4% 8.1% 4.7%
MANAGERIAL 1.0% 1.8% 0.9% 2.2% 3.8% 1.6% 3.3% 6.5% 3.2%
INTERMEDIATE 0.5% 0.9% 0.3% 0.9% 1.7% 0.8% 4.7% 6.0% 1.3%
ROUTINE 95.3% 89.8% -5.4% 95.2% 88.7% -6.5% 88.8% 77.1% -11.6%
SERVICE 0.8% 1.2% 0.5% 0.4% 0.9% 0.4% 0.3% 0.3% 0.1%
UNEMPLOYED 0.9% 1.7% 0.8% 0.3% 0.9% 0.6% 3.3% 1.0% -2.2%
NONEMPLOYED 0.6% 1.6% 1.0% 0.7% 1.6% 1.0% 1.2% 2.2% 1.1%
www.skope.ox.ac.uk
Results: early employment
• Younger cohort early employment patterns changed:– Less likely to go into routine occupations, holding everything else
constant– More likely to go into service occupation; no effect on probability of
going into managerial position
• Qualifications decrease probability of going into routine and service occupations– Younger cohort more qualified
• However:– Share of younger cohort going into routine jobs has not fallen in
proportion with total number of jobs– Qualification levels have no effect on which younger cohort workers go
into routine jobs
www.skope.ox.ac.uk
Results: mobility and earnings
• Workers moving to higher wage non-routine occupations earn less if they come from routine or service occupations (after controlling for educational differences)
Professional Managerial Intermediate
Profesional ref. 0.468 0.270
Managerial -0.678 * ref. 0.408
Intermediate -0.419 -0.100 ref.
Routine -0.277 -0.449 ** -1.071 ***
Manual -2.854 * 1.213 -0.684
Service -0.105 -1.024 ** -1.716 ***
Unemployed -1.897 ** -2.132 ** -2.423 ***
Nonemployed -1.551 *** -1.304 *** -1.084 ***
www.skope.ox.ac.uk
Conclusion
• The development of an ‘hourglass’ labour market has lead to upward occupational mobility
• However, it has also generated some downward mobility and led to worse outcomes for new entrants
• The role of qualifications is mixed:– More qualified are more upwardly mobile, but not less downwardly
mobile.– Qualifications have few effects for displaced workers– More qualified enter the labour market in better jobs, but not by as
much as expected
www.skope.ox.ac.uk
Conclusion
• Both suggest there are non-human capital barriers to mobility • There is a difference between wages and occupations when it
comes to determining winners– Those moving to apparently good non-routine jobs earn less if they
came from routine or service occupations– May reflect differences in unobserved skills (i.e. not reflected in
qualifications)– May also reflect job design
www.skope.ox.ac.uk
Contact Details
Craig HolmesESRC Centre on Skills, Knowledge and Organisational
Performance (SKOPE), Department of Education,
Norham Gardens,Oxford
Email: [email protected]