+ All Categories
Home > Documents > X Ray Interpretation:X Ray Interpretation...Lover fracture : results from axial load e.g. fall from...

X Ray Interpretation:X Ray Interpretation...Lover fracture : results from axial load e.g. fall from...

Date post: 14-Jul-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 2 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
40
Transcript
Page 1: X Ray Interpretation:X Ray Interpretation...Lover fracture : results from axial load e.g. fall from height Rdi hi f t D dB hl ’ lRadiographic features: Decreased Boehler’s angle
Page 2: X Ray Interpretation:X Ray Interpretation...Lover fracture : results from axial load e.g. fall from height Rdi hi f t D dB hl ’ lRadiographic features: Decreased Boehler’s angle

1

X Ray Interpretation:X Ray Interpretation: Classic Leg and Pelvis

Dr Jennifer Cowie

Radiology RegistrarRadiology Registrar

What you’re learning today Fractures and how to sound like you know y

what you’re talking about Most films you’ll get to see first so have a

go at spotting the abnormality NOFs and Pelvis fractures Lipohaemarthrosis and knee fractures Lipohaemarthrosis and knee fractures Ankle fractures Self Test at the end if we have time

Page 3: X Ray Interpretation:X Ray Interpretation...Lover fracture : results from axial load e.g. fall from height Rdi hi f t D dB hl ’ lRadiographic features: Decreased Boehler’s angle

2

Describing Fractures: SITE: Where is the fracture? Divide long bones into

thi d ( i l id h ft di t l h ft)thirds (proximal, mid shaft, distal shaft) TYPE: Comminuted? Intraarticular? Transverse, spiral,

oblique ANGULATION angle between the long axes of the

major fragments. DISPLACEMENT: Proportion of shaft width

IMPACTION O erlap of fragments along the a is IMPACTION: Overlap of fragments along the axis DISTRACTION: separation of fragments along the axis

The Report“This is an ..AP/Lateral/oblique… xray of …Name…

taken on …Date…”

“It shows a …Comminuted/Simple….(intraarticular) ….Spiral/Transverse/Oblique… fracture of the ….bone…. The fracture is ..angulated…displaced…impacted… distracted…”

Page 4: X Ray Interpretation:X Ray Interpretation...Lover fracture : results from axial load e.g. fall from height Rdi hi f t D dB hl ’ lRadiographic features: Decreased Boehler’s angle

3

“This is a lateral xray of JC taken on 25th May 2010 which shows a Comminuted, intraarticular fracture of the tibia, showing anterior angulationanterior angulation and impaction”

Page 5: X Ray Interpretation:X Ray Interpretation...Lover fracture : results from axial load e.g. fall from height Rdi hi f t D dB hl ’ lRadiographic features: Decreased Boehler’s angle

4

Page 6: X Ray Interpretation:X Ray Interpretation...Lover fracture : results from axial load e.g. fall from height Rdi hi f t D dB hl ’ lRadiographic features: Decreased Boehler’s angle

5

This is a AP xray of patient JC taken on 25th May 2010 which shows a comminuted intraarticular fractureintraarticular fracture of the left lateral tibial plateau with impaction. In addition, it shows a transverse fracture through the proximal fibula which is minimally displaced with minimal impaction or angulation.

Page 7: X Ray Interpretation:X Ray Interpretation...Lover fracture : results from axial load e.g. fall from height Rdi hi f t D dB hl ’ lRadiographic features: Decreased Boehler’s angle

6

This is an AP radiograph of patient JC taken on 25th May 2010 showing a spiralshowing a spiral fracture of the proximal right femur. There is some shortening and minimaland minimal medial displacement.

A Word on NOFs

Page 8: X Ray Interpretation:X Ray Interpretation...Lover fracture : results from axial load e.g. fall from height Rdi hi f t D dB hl ’ lRadiographic features: Decreased Boehler’s angle

7

BLOOD SUPPLY TO FEMORAL HEAD

Page 9: X Ray Interpretation:X Ray Interpretation...Lover fracture : results from axial load e.g. fall from height Rdi hi f t D dB hl ’ lRadiographic features: Decreased Boehler’s angle

8

Subtrochanteric fracture

Page 10: X Ray Interpretation:X Ray Interpretation...Lover fracture : results from axial load e.g. fall from height Rdi hi f t D dB hl ’ lRadiographic features: Decreased Boehler’s angle

9

Subcapital fracture

Page 11: X Ray Interpretation:X Ray Interpretation...Lover fracture : results from axial load e.g. fall from height Rdi hi f t D dB hl ’ lRadiographic features: Decreased Boehler’s angle

10

Basicervical fracture

Page 12: X Ray Interpretation:X Ray Interpretation...Lover fracture : results from axial load e.g. fall from height Rdi hi f t D dB hl ’ lRadiographic features: Decreased Boehler’s angle

11

Subcapital NOF

Page 13: X Ray Interpretation:X Ray Interpretation...Lover fracture : results from axial load e.g. fall from height Rdi hi f t D dB hl ’ lRadiographic features: Decreased Boehler’s angle

12

INTERTROCHANTERIC FRACTURE RIGHT FEMUR EXTRACAPSULAR INJURY. NOTE ALSO THE PROSTATIC METASTASES OF THE PELVIS.

Page 14: X Ray Interpretation:X Ray Interpretation...Lover fracture : results from axial load e.g. fall from height Rdi hi f t D dB hl ’ lRadiographic features: Decreased Boehler’s angle

13

A Word on PelvisA Word on Pelvis Fractures

Stable pelvic fractures

Page 15: X Ray Interpretation:X Ray Interpretation...Lover fracture : results from axial load e.g. fall from height Rdi hi f t D dB hl ’ lRadiographic features: Decreased Boehler’s angle

14

Unstable pelvic fractures

Pelvic Ring Fractures

Page 16: X Ray Interpretation:X Ray Interpretation...Lover fracture : results from axial load e.g. fall from height Rdi hi f t D dB hl ’ lRadiographic features: Decreased Boehler’s angle

15

Pelvis: Left iliac wing fracture (Duverney’s)M.V.A.

Page 17: X Ray Interpretation:X Ray Interpretation...Lover fracture : results from axial load e.g. fall from height Rdi hi f t D dB hl ’ lRadiographic features: Decreased Boehler’s angle

16

PELVIS: LEFT PUBIC RAMUS FRACTURES. LEFT SACRAL FRACTURE ALSO BETTER SEEN ON THE CT SCAN.

Page 18: X Ray Interpretation:X Ray Interpretation...Lover fracture : results from axial load e.g. fall from height Rdi hi f t D dB hl ’ lRadiographic features: Decreased Boehler’s angle

17

PELVIS: OPEN BOOK FRACTURE

Page 19: X Ray Interpretation:X Ray Interpretation...Lover fracture : results from axial load e.g. fall from height Rdi hi f t D dB hl ’ lRadiographic features: Decreased Boehler’s angle

18

PELVIS: Open book and Right acetabular fracture

Page 20: X Ray Interpretation:X Ray Interpretation...Lover fracture : results from axial load e.g. fall from height Rdi hi f t D dB hl ’ lRadiographic features: Decreased Boehler’s angle

19

Bucket handle + symphysis diastasis

Page 21: X Ray Interpretation:X Ray Interpretation...Lover fracture : results from axial load e.g. fall from height Rdi hi f t D dB hl ’ lRadiographic features: Decreased Boehler’s angle

20

Bilateral sacro-iliac joint diastasisRoad traffic accident

ACETABULAR FRACTURES: CT SCANNING VERY USEFUL IN ASSESSING FRACTURE EXTENT AND LOOSE BODIES.

Page 22: X Ray Interpretation:X Ray Interpretation...Lover fracture : results from axial load e.g. fall from height Rdi hi f t D dB hl ’ lRadiographic features: Decreased Boehler’s angle

21

ACETABULAR FRACTURES

Acetabular fracture.Complex.

Page 23: X Ray Interpretation:X Ray Interpretation...Lover fracture : results from axial load e.g. fall from height Rdi hi f t D dB hl ’ lRadiographic features: Decreased Boehler’s angle

22

A Word on KneeA Word on Knee Fractures

Page 24: X Ray Interpretation:X Ray Interpretation...Lover fracture : results from axial load e.g. fall from height Rdi hi f t D dB hl ’ lRadiographic features: Decreased Boehler’s angle

23

Lipohemarthrosis Right Knee(Tibial Fracture not evident initially.)

Lipohaemarthrosis

Page 25: X Ray Interpretation:X Ray Interpretation...Lover fracture : results from axial load e.g. fall from height Rdi hi f t D dB hl ’ lRadiographic features: Decreased Boehler’s angle

24

Patellar fractureMay be vertical; transverse(commonest) or comminuted.

Page 26: X Ray Interpretation:X Ray Interpretation...Lover fracture : results from axial load e.g. fall from height Rdi hi f t D dB hl ’ lRadiographic features: Decreased Boehler’s angle

25

Transverse midshaft fracture tibia, 100% lateral displacement, lateral angulation. Oblique fracture distal shaft tibia, 40% lateral displacement. Transverse fracture midshaft fibula with shortening. Complete dislocation of femur on tibia. Tibial shaft posterior with respect to femur.

Page 27: X Ray Interpretation:X Ray Interpretation...Lover fracture : results from axial load e.g. fall from height Rdi hi f t D dB hl ’ lRadiographic features: Decreased Boehler’s angle

26

What else do you need to think about withto think about with

that type of fracture?

Arterial Supply

POP ART INTACT

Anterior Tibial Artery Defect

Ant Tib Artery Defect

INTACT

Page 28: X Ray Interpretation:X Ray Interpretation...Lover fracture : results from axial load e.g. fall from height Rdi hi f t D dB hl ’ lRadiographic features: Decreased Boehler’s angle

27

A Word on AnkleA Word on Ankle Fractures

Weber A: Inversion injury.Transverse fracture of lateral malleolus or rupture of lateral collateral ligament; oblique fracture of medial malleolusThe tibio-fibular ligament complex is spared

Weber B: Supination-lateral rotation injury or

pronation-abduction.

Transverse fracture of medial malleolus or rupture of deltoid ligament; oblique or spiral fracture of lateral malleolus near joint.

Partial disruption of tibio-fibular ligament complex

Weber C: Pronation –lateral rotation injury

Proximal fracture of fibula; transverse fracture of medial malleolus or rupture of deltoid ligament.

Complete rupture of tibio-fibular ligament complex.

Page 29: X Ray Interpretation:X Ray Interpretation...Lover fracture : results from axial load e.g. fall from height Rdi hi f t D dB hl ’ lRadiographic features: Decreased Boehler’s angle

28

Weber classification of bimalleolar ankle injuries

WEBER A WEBER B WEBER C

TALUS FRACTURE

May be complicated by proximal AVN

Page 30: X Ray Interpretation:X Ray Interpretation...Lover fracture : results from axial load e.g. fall from height Rdi hi f t D dB hl ’ lRadiographic features: Decreased Boehler’s angle

29

AXIALLATERAL

Calcaneal fracture with loss of Boehler’s angle

AXIALLATERAL

Page 31: X Ray Interpretation:X Ray Interpretation...Lover fracture : results from axial load e.g. fall from height Rdi hi f t D dB hl ’ lRadiographic features: Decreased Boehler’s angle

30

Calcaneal fractures

Lover fracture : results from axial load e.g. fall from height

R di hi f t D d B hl ’ lRadiographic features: Decreased Boehler’s angle (<20degrees).

10% are bilateral. 75% are intraarticular(subtalar joint) Assoc fractures:Thoracolumbar burst fracture(Don

Juan fractures). Pilon fractures.

Calcaneal stress fractures :vertical linear appearance. Occur in runners,diabetics and elderly.

Cancaneal fractures. Normal Boehler’s angleand typical axis of stress fracture

Page 32: X Ray Interpretation:X Ray Interpretation...Lover fracture : results from axial load e.g. fall from height Rdi hi f t D dB hl ’ lRadiographic features: Decreased Boehler’s angle

31

Midtarsal dislocation (Chopart) and Tarsometatarsal fracture-dislocation (Lisfranc) injuries

Lisfranc # Dislocations

HOMOVERGENT LISFRANC INJURY

Page 33: X Ray Interpretation:X Ray Interpretation...Lover fracture : results from axial load e.g. fall from height Rdi hi f t D dB hl ’ lRadiographic features: Decreased Boehler’s angle

32

Lisfranc Injury: often results from a fall. Also seen with diabetic neuropathic joint disease

DIVERGENT LISFRANC

Page 34: X Ray Interpretation:X Ray Interpretation...Lover fracture : results from axial load e.g. fall from height Rdi hi f t D dB hl ’ lRadiographic features: Decreased Boehler’s angle

33

Base of 5th metatarsal transverse fracture: Inversion injury

AVULSION FRACTURE

SPIRAL FRACTOF 4th MT

BASE OF 5th MT FRACT

SELF TEST

Page 35: X Ray Interpretation:X Ray Interpretation...Lover fracture : results from axial load e.g. fall from height Rdi hi f t D dB hl ’ lRadiographic features: Decreased Boehler’s angle

34

Page 36: X Ray Interpretation:X Ray Interpretation...Lover fracture : results from axial load e.g. fall from height Rdi hi f t D dB hl ’ lRadiographic features: Decreased Boehler’s angle

35

Page 37: X Ray Interpretation:X Ray Interpretation...Lover fracture : results from axial load e.g. fall from height Rdi hi f t D dB hl ’ lRadiographic features: Decreased Boehler’s angle

36

End of TestNow for the answers…

Page 38: X Ray Interpretation:X Ray Interpretation...Lover fracture : results from axial load e.g. fall from height Rdi hi f t D dB hl ’ lRadiographic features: Decreased Boehler’s angle

37

Comminuted intraarticularintraarticular fracture of the distal femur with posterior displacement and angulation

dand some evidence of impaction.

Right superior and inferior pubic ramus fractures, with somewith some displacement. Also evidence of linear hypodensity in the right acetabulum concerning for acetabularacetabular fracture. Suggest CT to correlate.

Page 39: X Ray Interpretation:X Ray Interpretation...Lover fracture : results from axial load e.g. fall from height Rdi hi f t D dB hl ’ lRadiographic features: Decreased Boehler’s angle

38

Comminutedtransversetransverse fracture of distal femus with shortening. No angulation. Minimal posteriordisplacement.

IMPACTED SUBCAPITAL FEMORAL NECK FRACTURECAN BE VERY SUBTLE.

Page 40: X Ray Interpretation:X Ray Interpretation...Lover fracture : results from axial load e.g. fall from height Rdi hi f t D dB hl ’ lRadiographic features: Decreased Boehler’s angle

39

Look at the whole film

Fracture of theFracture of the proximal tibia (need other views to determine angulation etc)


Recommended