+ All Categories
Home > Economy & Finance > xcel energy 12_6XcelUtilityWeekSECwAppendix12062006

xcel energy 12_6XcelUtilityWeekSECwAppendix12062006

Date post: 25-Jul-2015
Category:
Upload: finance26
View: 92 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
39
Building the Core Building the Core Sustainable Growth Sustainable Growth Ben Ben Fowke Fowke Vice President and CFO Vice President and CFO Wall Street Utility Group Wall Street Utility Group December 6, 2006 December 6, 2006
Transcript

Building the CoreBuilding the CoreSustainable GrowthSustainable Growth

Ben Ben FowkeFowkeVice President and CFOVice President and CFO

Wall Street Utility GroupWall Street Utility GroupDecember 6, 2006December 6, 2006

This material includes forwardThis material includes forward--looking statements that are subject to certain looking statements that are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Such forwardrisks, uncertainties and assumptions. Such forward--looking statements looking statements include projected earnings, cash flows, capital expenditures aninclude projected earnings, cash flows, capital expenditures and other d other statements and are identified in this document by the words statements and are identified in this document by the words ““anticipate,anticipate,””““estimate,estimate,”” ““expect,expect,”” ““projected,projected,”” ““objective,objective,”” ““outlook,outlook,”” ““possible,possible,””““potentialpotential”” and similar expressions. Actual results may vary materially. and similar expressions. Actual results may vary materially. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially incFactors that could cause actual results to differ materially include, but are lude, but are not limited to: general economic conditions, including the availnot limited to: general economic conditions, including the availability of ability of credit, actions of rating agencies and their impact on capital ecredit, actions of rating agencies and their impact on capital expenditures; xpenditures; business conditions in the energy industry; competitive factors;business conditions in the energy industry; competitive factors; unusual unusual weather; effects of geopolitical events, including war and acts weather; effects of geopolitical events, including war and acts of terrorism; of terrorism; changes in federal or state legislation; regulation; costs and ochanges in federal or state legislation; regulation; costs and other effects of ther effects of legal administrative proceedings, settlements, investigations anlegal administrative proceedings, settlements, investigations and claims d claims including litigation related to companyincluding litigation related to company--owned life insurance (COLI); actions owned life insurance (COLI); actions of accounting regulatory bodies; the higher degree of risk assocof accounting regulatory bodies; the higher degree of risk associated with iated with Xcel EnergyXcel Energy’’s nonregulated businesses compared with Xcel Energys nonregulated businesses compared with Xcel Energy’’s s regulated business; and other risk factors listed from time to tregulated business; and other risk factors listed from time to time by Xcel ime by Xcel Energy in reports filed with the SEC, including Exhibit 99.01 toEnergy in reports filed with the SEC, including Exhibit 99.01 to Xcel Xcel EnergyEnergy’’s report on Form 10s report on Form 10--K for year 2005.K for year 2005.

Safe HarborSafe Harbor

Delivering Value Delivering Value —— Now and in the FutureNow and in the Future

Building the core— Meeting customers’ needs— Environmental leadership — Getting the rules right

Accomplishments— Regulatory— Legislative

Future growth

Financing the plan

Building the core— Meeting customers’ needs— Environmental leadership — Getting the rules right

Accomplishments— Regulatory— Legislative

Future growth

Financing the plan

Building the CoreBuilding the CoreDelivering competitively priced, reliable energyDelivering competitively priced, reliable energy

Milwaukee

Milwaukee

Milwaukee

0

3

6

9

12

15

18

21

0

3

6

9

12

15

18

21Cents per kWh (Retail)Cents per kWh (Retail)Cents per kWh (Retail)

7.017.017.01

Des Moines

Des Moines

Des Moines

Amarillo

Amarillo

Amarillo

Kansas City

Kansas City

Kansas City

Denver

Denver

Denver

Mpls/St. Paul

Mpls/St. Paul

Mpls/St. Paul

BostonBostonBoston

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Phoenix

Phoenix

Phoenix

Salt Lake City

Salt Lake City

Salt Lake City

St. Louis

St. Louis

St. Louis

MiamiMiamiMiami

New York

New York

New York

Washington DC

Washington DC

Washington DC

6.646.646.64 7.797.797.79

Source: Summer 2006 EEI Typical BillsSource: Summer 2006 EEI Typical BillsSource: Summer 2006 EEI Typical Bills

1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006

Building the CoreBuilding the CoreEnvironmental LeadershipEnvironmental LeadershipPromoting Conservation and Load ManagementPromoting Conservation and Load Management

Number of plants avoidedNumber of plants avoided

1 Plant = 250 MW1 Plant = 250 MW

1.61.62.72.7

3.73.74.74.7

5.55.56.56.5

7.47.48.28.2

Building the CoreBuilding the CoreEnvironmental LeadershipEnvironmental Leadership

Largest U.S. wind provider

Double wind supply byyear end 2007

Community-based energy

Largest U.S. solarphotovoltaic announced

Wood waste andrefuse-derived fuel

Largest U.S. wind provider

Double wind supply byyear end 2007

Community-based energy

Largest U.S. solarphotovoltaic announced

Wood waste andrefuse-derived fuel

Leader in renewablesLeader in renewables

Building the CoreBuilding the CoreEnvironmental LeadershipEnvironmental Leadership

Colorado Emission Reduction Program

MERP

Comanche 1 & 2

Plant uprates

Colorado Emission Reduction Program

MERP

Comanche 1 & 2

Plant uprates

Reducing emissions, increasing efficiencyReducing emissions, increasing efficiency

Building the CoreBuilding the CoreEnvironmental LeadershipEnvironmental Leadership

IGCC with sequestration

Wind Hydrogen Energy

IGCC with sequestration

Wind Hydrogen Energy

Adopting new technologyAdopting new technology

Xcel Energy in Dow Jones Sustainability IndexXcel Energy in Dow Jones Sustainability Index

Getting the Rules RightGetting the Rules RightHelping shape public policy –One of the most important things we can doHelping shape public policy –One of the most important things we can do

Credibility and leadership to achieveconsensus on the appropriate balance:— Customers— Communities — Environmentalists— Regulators — Legislators— Investors

Credibility and leadership to achieveconsensus on the appropriate balance:— Customers— Communities — Environmentalists— Regulators — Legislators— Investors

Constructive RegulationConstructive RegulationRecent rate case outcomesRecent rate case outcomesDollars in millionsDollars in millions

Colorado Gas $34.5 $22.0 11.0% 10.5%Wisconsin Electric 53.1 43.4 11.9 11.0Wisconsin Gas 7.8 3.9 11.9 11.0Minnesota Electric 156 131/115 * 11.0 10.54Colorado Electric 208 151 ** 11.0 10.50

Colorado Gas $34.5 $22.0 11.0% 10.5%Wisconsin Electric 53.1 43.4 11.9 11.0Wisconsin Gas 7.8 3.9 11.9 11.0Minnesota Electric 156 131/115 * 11.0 10.54Colorado Electric 208 151 ** 11.0 10.50

Dollar IncreaseDollar Increase Return on EquityReturn on EquityRequested GrantedRequested Granted Requested GrantedRequested Granted

** $131 million for 2006 reduced to $115 million in 2007 for large $131 million for 2006 reduced to $115 million in 2007 for large customer customer coming oncoming on--line January 1, 2007 line January 1, 2007

**** $107 million base rates, $39.4 million PCCA and $4.6 million$107 million base rates, $39.4 million PCCA and $4.6 millionWindsource Windsource costscosts

Colorado Gas Rate Case HighlightsColorado Gas Rate Case Highlights

Requested $41.5 million increase

Gas rate base = $1.1 Billion

11% return on common equity

Equity ratio = 60%

Partial decoupling

Requested $41.5 million increase

Gas rate base = $1.1 Billion

11% return on common equity

Equity ratio = 60%

Partial decoupling

Regulatory & Legislative Regulatory & Legislative AccomplishmentsAccomplishments

MERP – Forward recoveryComanche 3 – Forward CWIP through rate case filingTransmission investment – Forward recovery – MN & SDMercury reduction – Forward recovery – MNEnvironmental expenditures – Forward recovery – MNRenewable investments – Forward recovery – COIGCC – Supportive legislation – COTransmission investment:

Recovery legislation – TXRecovery potential – CO, ND

Purchased capacity cost adjustment – CO

MERP – Forward recoveryComanche 3 – Forward CWIP through rate case filingTransmission investment – Forward recovery – MN & SDMercury reduction – Forward recovery – MNEnvironmental expenditures – Forward recovery – MNRenewable investments – Forward recovery – COIGCC – Supportive legislation – COTransmission investment:

Recovery legislation – TXRecovery potential – CO, ND

Purchased capacity cost adjustment – CO

AA

AAPP

AAAA--MNMN

0606 0707 0808 0909 1010 1111 1212 1313 1414 1515 1616 1717 1818 1919 2020

$700 $900

$60

$300$700

$100

$700

$30$4

CommittedEstimated CostPotential Investment

AA--MNMNAA--MNMN

AA--MNMN

AA--MNMNFF

AAAA

AAAA

AA ApprovedApprovedRiderRiderRecoveryRecovery

FF ForwardForwardRegulatoryRegulatoryRecoveryRecovery

Investment Opportunities 2006 Investment Opportunities 2006 -- 20202020

MERPMERPComanche 3Comanche 3

CapX 2020 Group 1CapX 2020 Group 1Colorado IGCCColorado IGCC

MercuryMercuryCAIRCAIR

License Extension & Uprate:License Extension & Uprate:

Plant Repowering & Uprate Plant Repowering & Uprate New Generation/Gas StorageNew Generation/Gas StorageEnvironmental ImprovementsEnvironmental Improvements

CapX 2020 Group 2CapX 2020 Group 2CapX 2020 Group 3CapX 2020 Group 3

MonticelloMonticelloPrairie IslandPrairie Island

Funding Sustainable GrowthFunding Sustainable Growth

5 – 7% EPS growth *

Dividend per sharegrowth 2 – 4% per year

Improve credit rating

5 – 7% EPS growth *

Dividend per sharegrowth 2 – 4% per year

Improve credit rating

ObjectivesObjectives

* Base of $1.30 per share, mid-point of 2006 guidance and successful COLI outcome

* Base of $1.30 per share, mid-point of 2006 guidance and successful COLI outcome

Base & Other CapitalBase & Other CapitalExpendituresExpenditures $ 850$ 850 $ 850$ 850 $ 830$ 830 $ 990$ 990 $ 980$ 980

MERPMERP 350350 270270 180180 4040 1010Comanche 3Comanche 3 200200 340340 280280 6060 1010Minnesota WindMinnesota Wind

TransmissionTransmission 6060 120120 1010 5050 20 20 CapX 2020CapX 2020 1010 2020 110110 240240Nuclear Nuclear

FuelFuel 7575 8080 8080 135135 100100BalanceBalance 8585 100100 100100 115115 140140

TotalTotal $1,620$1,620 $1,770$1,770 $1,500$1,500 $1,500$1,500 $1,500$1,500

Capital Expenditure ForecastCapital Expenditure Forecast

20062006 20072007 20082008 20092009 20102010

Dollars in millionsDollars in millions Denotes enhanced recovery processDenotes enhanced recovery process

Assumptions Assumptions —— Potential SourcesPotential Sourcesand Uses of Cashand Uses of Cash

The forecast scenario is illustrative of a potential outcome, and does not imply guidance or a mostlikely outcomeEPS growth of 6% per year, mid-point of the 5 – 7% objective range, from 2006 midpoint of $1.30Dividend rate increase 3% per year, mid-point of the 2 – 4% objective rangeDividends increase in 2007 and 2008 for expected conversion of convertible notesDepreciation growth consistent with rate baseNo change in working capital or deferred taxesCOLI successfully resolved

The forecast scenario is illustrative of a potential outcome, and does not imply guidance or a mostlikely outcomeEPS growth of 6% per year, mid-point of the 5 – 7% objective range, from 2006 midpoint of $1.30Dividend rate increase 3% per year, mid-point of the 2 – 4% objective rangeDividends increase in 2007 and 2008 for expected conversion of convertible notesDepreciation growth consistent with rate baseNo change in working capital or deferred taxesCOLI successfully resolved

Cash from OperationsCash from Operations $ 1,650$ 1,650 $ 1,700$ 1,700 $ 1,800$ 1,800 $ 1,900$ 1,900

Cash from InvestingCash from InvestingCapital ExpendituresCapital Expenditures (1,770)(1,770) (1,500)(1,500) (1,500)(1,500) (1,500)(1,500)Nuclear DecommissioningNuclear Decommissioning (45)(45) (45)(45) (45)(45) (45)(45)

Cash from FinancingCash from FinancingDRIPDRIP 4040 4040 4040 40 40 DividendsDividends (370)(370) (390)(390) (420)(420) (440)(440)

Financing NeededFinancing Needed $ 495$ 495 $ 195$ 195 $ 125$ 125 $ 45$ 45

Potential Sources and Uses of Cash *Potential Sources and Uses of Cash *

20072007 20082008 20092009 20102010Dollars in millionsDollars in millions

** This forecast scenario is illustrative of a potential outcome, This forecast scenario is illustrative of a potential outcome, and does not imply guidance or a most likely outcomeand does not imply guidance or a most likely outcome

Financing GrowthFinancing Growth

Current financing plan includes:— DRIP— Modest debt ($600 million)— Hybrid preferred ($300 million 2008)

Current financing plan includes:— DRIP— Modest debt ($600 million)— Hybrid preferred ($300 million 2008)

Financing plans to remain flexible:— Capital expenditure opportunities— Unanticipated credit events

Financing plans to remain flexible:— Capital expenditure opportunities— Unanticipated credit events

40

50

2006 2007 ** 2008 ** 2009 2010

Improving Credit Metrics *Improving Credit Metrics *

Financing needed funded with:Current plan100% debt

Financing needed funded with:Current plan100% debt

* This forecast scenario is illustrative of a potential outcome, and does not imply guidance or a most likely outcome

** Assuming conversion of convertible notes into equity

** This forecast scenario is illustrative of a potential outcome, This forecast scenario is illustrative of a potential outcome, and does not imply guidance or a most likely outcomeand does not imply guidance or a most likely outcome

** Assuming conversion of convertible notes into equity

43.543.5

4545 45.545.5 4646

47.547.5

Percent equity capitalization Percent equity capitalization

46.546.5 4747

48.548.5

2006 Earnings Guidance Range * 2006 Earnings Guidance Range *

Regulated Utility $1.25 – $1.35Holding Company

and Other (0.10)COLI – Tax Benefit 0.10

Continuing Operations $1.25 – $1.35 **

Regulated Utility $1.25 – $1.35Holding Company

and Other (0.10)COLI – Tax Benefit 0.10

Continuing Operations $1.25 – $1.35 **

20062006

Dollars per shareDollars per share

* Assumptions in appendix** Expectation is to end the year in the upper half of the

guidance range

* Assumptions in appendix** Expectation is to end the year in the upper half of the

guidance range

2007 Earnings Guidance Range *2007 Earnings Guidance Range *

Regulated Utility $1.39 – $1.49Holding Company

and Other (0.15)COLI – Tax Benefit 0.11

Continuing Operations $1.35 – $1.45

Regulated Utility $1.39 – $1.49Holding Company

and Other (0.15)COLI – Tax Benefit 0.11

Continuing Operations $1.35 – $1.45

20072007

Dollars per shareDollars per share

* Assumptions in appendix* Assumptions in appendix

Sustainable GrowthSustainable Growth

Collaborative process that balances various interests and delivers value to customers and investorsConstructive rate case outcomesForward recovery on significant incremental investmentsPipeline of investments beyond 2010

Collaborative process that balances various interests and delivers value to customers and investorsConstructive rate case outcomesForward recovery on significant incremental investmentsPipeline of investments beyond 2010

Attractive Total ReturnAttractive Total ReturnSustainable 5 Sustainable 5 –– 7% earnings per share growth7% earnings per share growthDividend yield Dividend yield 4%4%Dividend growth of 2 Dividend growth of 2 –– 4% per year4% per year

AppendixAppendix

Northern States Northern States Power CompanyPower Company--

MinnesotaMinnesota44% Net Income 44% Net Income

Public Service Public Service Company of Company of

ColoradoColorado39% Net Income39% Net Income

Southwestern Southwestern Public ServicePublic Service

12% Net Income12% Net Income

Northern Northern States Power States Power

CompanyCompany--WisconsinWisconsin

5% Net Income5% Net Income

5th Largest Combination Electric and Gas Utility (based on customers)

5th Largest Combination Electric and Gas Utility (based on customers)

Traditional RegulationTraditional Regulation

2005 EPS $1.20 continuing operations2006 Dividend $0.89 annualized2005 EPS $1.20 continuing operations2006 Dividend $0.89 annualized

CoalCoal 3636 8,1388,138Natural GasNatural Gas 6161 4,9184,918NuclearNuclear 33 1,6171,617HydroHydro 8383 508508OilOil 2424 492492RDFRDF 66 9696WindWind -- 2525TotalTotal 15,79415,794

2005 OwnedGenerating Facilities

2005 OwnedGenerating Facilities

Unit TypeUnit Type NumberNumber MWMW

* Xcel Energy supplies in * Xcel Energy supplies in excess of 1100 MWs of excess of 1100 MWs of wind powerwind power

**

Xcel Energy Supply SourcesXcel Energy Supply Sources

Nuclear10%

Nuclear10%

Coal **45%

Coal **45%

Gas & Oil38%

Gas & Oil38%

* Includes purchases** Low-sulfur western coal* Includes purchases** Low-sulfur western coal

Renewables7%

Renewables7%

2005Energy Supply Mix*

2005Energy Supply Mix*

NSP NSP –– MinnesotaMinnesota $ 910$ 910 $ 880$ 880 $ 680$ 680 $ 810$ 810 $ 820$ 820NSP NSP –– WisconsinWisconsin 6060 7070 7070 5050 6060PSCoPSCo 550550 680680 620620 510510 500500SPSSPS 100100 140140 130130 130130 120120TotalTotal $1,620$1,620 $1,770$1,770 $1,500$1,500 $1,500$1,500 $1,500$1,500

Capital Expenditure ForecastCapital Expenditure Forecastby Operating Companyby Operating Company

20062006 20072007 20082008 20092009 20102010

Dollars in millionsDollars in millions

2005 Rate Base and Returns2005 Rate Base and Returns

Colorado Electric $3,120 8.5%Colorado Gas 1,084 7.00Minnesota Electric 3,230 10.61 9.98%Minnesota Gas 422 6.30 7.42North Dakota Electric 175 12.46 12.65North Dakota Gas 42 5.71 6.81South Dakota Electric 191SPS Electric 1,422Wisconsin Electric 613Wisconsin Gas 83

Colorado Electric $3,120 8.5%Colorado Gas 1,084 7.00Minnesota Electric 3,230 10.61 9.98%Minnesota Gas 422 6.30 7.42North Dakota Electric 175 12.46 12.65North Dakota Gas 42 5.71 6.81South Dakota Electric 191SPS Electric 1,422Wisconsin Electric 613Wisconsin Gas 83

Rate Weather-Base Actual NormalizedRateRate WeatherWeather--BaseBase ActualActual NormalizedNormalized

** Reflects regulatory reporting requirementsReflects regulatory reporting requirements**** Electric and GasElectric and Gas

Return on Equity *Return on Equity *Return on Equity *

6.26 **6.26 **

Dollars in millionsDollars in millions

Senior Debt RatingsSenior Debt Ratings

Holding Co. BBB+ Baa1 BBB-NSPM A+ A2 A- A A3 BBB-NSPW A+ A2 A- A A3 BBB PSCo A- A3 A- BBB+ Baa1 BBB-SPS A- Baa1 BBB

Holding Co. BBB+ Baa1 BBB-NSPM A+ A2 A- A A3 BBB-NSPW A+ A2 A- A A3 BBB PSCo A- A3 A- BBB+ Baa1 BBB-SPS A- Baa1 BBB

Fitch Moody’s S&P Fitch Moody’s S&PFitch Moody’s S&P Fitch Moody’s S&PSecuredSecured UnsecuredUnsecured

Texas Electric Rate Case HighlightsTexas Electric Rate Case Highlights

Requested $63 million increase,capped at $48 million

Electric rate base = $943 million

11.6% return on common equity

Equity ratio = 51%

Historical test year with adjustments for known and measurable

Expect rates to be in effect second quarter 2007

Requested $63 million increase,capped at $48 million

Electric rate base = $943 million

11.6% return on common equity

Equity ratio = 51%

Historical test year with adjustments for known and measurable

Expect rates to be in effect second quarter 2007

Minnesota Gas Rate Case HighlightsMinnesota Gas Rate Case Highlights

Requested $18.5 million increase

Gas rate base = $440 million

11% return on common equity

Equity ratio = 52%

Forward test year

Rates under bond $15.9 million January 8, 2007

Requested $18.5 million increase

Gas rate base = $440 million

11% return on common equity

Equity ratio = 52%

Forward test year

Rates under bond $15.9 million January 8, 2007

Potential Additional Rate CasesPotential Additional Rate Caseswith 2007 Impactwith 2007 Impact

North Dakota Electric Potential

New Mexico Electric Potential

South Dakota Electric Potential

North Dakota Electric Potential

New Mexico Electric Potential

South Dakota Electric Potential

Minnesota Cost Recovery MechanismsMinnesota Cost Recovery Mechanisms

Projected electric fuel and purchased energy costs billed for the current month with subsequent true-up; MISO energy and ancillary services being recovered through FCA.

Projected purchased gas cost billed for the current monthwith subsequent true-up

Conservation Improvement Program rider which providesrecovery of program costs plus incentives

Metro Emission Reduction Program, Renewable Development Fund and State Energy Policy rider in place

General Transmission rider authorized by law

Mercury Reduction and Environmental Improvement rider authorized by law

Projected electric fuel and purchased energy costs billed for Projected electric fuel and purchased energy costs billed for the current month with subsequent truethe current month with subsequent true--up; MISO energy and up; MISO energy and ancillary services being recovered through FCA. ancillary services being recovered through FCA.

Projected purchased gas cost billed for the current monthProjected purchased gas cost billed for the current monthwith subsequent truewith subsequent true--upup

Conservation Improvement Program rider which providesConservation Improvement Program rider which providesrecovery of program costs plus incentivesrecovery of program costs plus incentives

Metro Emission Reduction Program, Renewable Development Metro Emission Reduction Program, Renewable Development Fund and State Energy Policy rider in place Fund and State Energy Policy rider in place

General Transmission rider authorized by lawGeneral Transmission rider authorized by law

Mercury Reduction and Environmental Improvement rider Mercury Reduction and Environmental Improvement rider authorized by lawauthorized by law

Colorado Cost Recovery MechanismsColorado Cost Recovery MechanismsQuarterly Energy Cost Adjustment to recover electric fuel and Quarterly Energy Cost Adjustment to recover electric fuel and purchased energy costspurchased energy costsMonthly Gas Cost Adjustment recovers natural gas commodity, Monthly Gas Cost Adjustment recovers natural gas commodity, interstate pipeline and storage costsinterstate pipeline and storage costsAnnual Purchased Capacity Adjustment to recover demand Annual Purchased Capacity Adjustment to recover demand component of purchased power contracts through the earliercomponent of purchased power contracts through the earlierof yearof year--end 2010 or Comanche 3 completion end 2010 or Comanche 3 completion Fuel Cost Adjustment recovers electric fuel and purchased Fuel Cost Adjustment recovers electric fuel and purchased energy costs from wholesale customersenergy costs from wholesale customersDemandDemand--side Management Cost Adjustment rider (gas and side Management Cost Adjustment rider (gas and electric) and Air Quality Improvement rider (recovers cost of electric) and Air Quality Improvement rider (recovers cost of emission controls on several Denver metro generation facilities)emission controls on several Denver metro generation facilities)Recovery of Comanche 3 construction workRecovery of Comanche 3 construction work--inin--progress progress Recovery of expenditures for renewable mandateRecovery of expenditures for renewable mandateRider recovery of IGCC investmentRider recovery of IGCC investment

CorporateCorporate--Owned Life InsuranceOwned Life InsuranceLitigation (COLI)Litigation (COLI)

Positive pre-deduction cash flowsMortality gainsThe buildup of cash values

Positive prePositive pre--deduction cash flowsdeduction cash flowsMortality gainsMortality gainsThe buildup of cash valuesThe buildup of cash values

The courtThe court’’s opinion in the Dow case outlined three indicators s opinion in the Dow case outlined three indicators of potential economic benefits to be examined in a COLI case. of potential economic benefits to be examined in a COLI case.

In Xcel EnergyIn Xcel Energy’’s COLI case, the plans:s COLI case, the plans:Were projected to have sizeable preWere projected to have sizeable pre--deduction cash flows, deduction cash flows, based upon the relevant assumptions when purchasedbased upon the relevant assumptions when purchasedPresented the opportunity for mortality gains that were not Presented the opportunity for mortality gains that were not eliminated either retroactively or prospectivelyeliminated either retroactively or prospectivelyHad large cash value increases that were not encumbered by Had large cash value increases that were not encumbered by loans during the first seven years of the policiesloans during the first seven years of the policies

Hearing likely second half of 2006Hearing likely second half of 2006

2006 Key Earnings2006 Key EarningsGuidance AssumptionsGuidance Assumptions

Approval of Minnesota electric rate case decision

No material incremental accruals in SPS regulatory proceedings

Normal weather patterns for remainder of year

Weather adjusted sales growth:— Retail electric 1.8 – 2.1%— Retail gas decline 1 – 2%

Short-term wholesale and commodity trading margins of $30 – $40 million

Operating and maintenance expenses increase 4%

Approval of Minnesota electric rate case decision

No material incremental accruals in SPS regulatory proceedings

Normal weather patterns for remainder of year

Weather adjusted sales growth:— Retail electric 1.8 – 2.1%— Retail gas decline 1 – 2%

Short-term wholesale and commodity trading margins of $30 – $40 million

Operating and maintenance expenses increase 4%

2006 Key Earnings2006 Key EarningsGuidance Assumptions Guidance Assumptions (continued)(continued)

Depreciation increases $45 – $55 million, excluding decommissioning

Decommissioning accruals increase approximately $20 million

Interest expense increases $10 – $15 million

AFUDC equity increases $5 – $10 million

Continue to recognize COLI tax deduction

Effective tax rate of 24 – 26%

Average common shares are 430 million basedon “if converted” method

Depreciation increases $45 – $55 million, excluding decommissioning

Decommissioning accruals increase approximately $20 million

Interest expense increases $10 – $15 million

AFUDC equity increases $5 – $10 million

Continue to recognize COLI tax deduction

Effective tax rate of 24 – 26%

Average common shares are 430 million basedon “if converted” method

2007 Key Earnings2007 Key EarningsGuidance AssumptionsGuidance Assumptions

Approval of Minnesota electric rate case decisionApproval of Colorado electric rate case settlementReasonable rate recovery is approved— Texas electric rate request — Potential Minnesota gas rate request— Potential Colorado gas rate requestNo material incremental accruals in SPS regulatory proceedingsNormal weather patternsWeather adjusted sales growth:— Retail electric 1.7 – 2.2%— Retail gas decline 1 – 2%

Approval of Minnesota electric rate case decisionApproval of Colorado electric rate case settlementReasonable rate recovery is approved— Texas electric rate request — Potential Minnesota gas rate request— Potential Colorado gas rate requestNo material incremental accruals in SPS regulatory proceedingsNormal weather patternsWeather adjusted sales growth:— Retail electric 1.7 – 2.2%— Retail gas decline 1 – 2%

2007 Key Earnings2007 Key EarningsGuidance Assumptions Guidance Assumptions (continued)(continued)

Short-term wholesale and commodity trading marginsof $15 – $25 millionCapacity costs at NSPM and SPS increase $35 millionOperating and maintenance expenses increase 2 – 3%Depreciation increases $45 – $55 millionInterest expense increases $35 to $40 millionAFUDC equity increases $17 – $23 millionContinue to recognize COLI tax deductionEffective tax rate of 28 – 31%Average common shares are 433 million basedon “if converted” method

Short-term wholesale and commodity trading marginsof $15 – $25 millionCapacity costs at NSPM and SPS increase $35 millionOperating and maintenance expenses increase 2 – 3%Depreciation increases $45 – $55 millionInterest expense increases $35 to $40 millionAFUDC equity increases $17 – $23 millionContinue to recognize COLI tax deductionEffective tax rate of 28 – 31%Average common shares are 433 million basedon “if converted” method


Recommended