+ All Categories
Home > Documents > XRD Case Study: CdS Nano-rods · XRD Case Study: CdS Nano-rods y 20 40 60 80 100 2-theta (degrees)...

XRD Case Study: CdS Nano-rods · XRD Case Study: CdS Nano-rods y 20 40 60 80 100 2-theta (degrees)...

Date post: 26-Sep-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 8 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
1
XRD Case Study: CdS Nano-rods Intensity 100 80 60 40 20 2-theta (degrees) Intensity 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 2-theta (degrees) 100 002 101 FWHM=1.87 FWHM=0.41 => 24.1 nm => 5.3 nm Peak positions match hexagonal CdS phase “Greenockite” Requires only a few milligrams of sample INSET: Analysis of linewidths using the Scherrer equation gives particle dimensions consistent with TEM, and shows crystallographic axis of rod growth. Non-uniform diffraction rings imply orientation of crystals. This also manifests in relative peak intensities.
Transcript
Page 1: XRD Case Study: CdS Nano-rods · XRD Case Study: CdS Nano-rods y 20 40 60 80 100 2-theta (degrees) CdS "Greenockite" y 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 2-theta (degrees) 100 002 101 FWHM=1.87

XRD Case Study: CdS Nano-rods

Inte

nsity

100806040202-theta (degrees)

CdS "Greenockite"

Inte

nsity

323028262422202-theta (degrees)

100

002

101

FWHM=1.87

FWHM=0.41 => 24.1 nm

=> 5.3 nm

Peak positions match hexagonal CdS phase “Greenockite”

Requires only a few milligrams of sample

INSET: Analysis of linewidths using the Scherrer equation gives particle dimensions consistent with TEM, and shows crystallographic axis of rod growth.

Non-uniform diffraction rings imply orientation of crystals. This also manifests in relative

peak intensities.

Recommended