YORK LAW SCHOOL
Getting Away from DoughnutsThe 'Discretion' in Discretionary Housing
Payments
YORK LAW SCHOOL
YORK LAW SCHOOL
Today’s Argument in a nut-shell: 2. That divergent
‘assumptive worlds’ are problematic – three key reasons for this:
1. Problems of Function2. Problems of Interpretations3. Problems of Agency
1. The Problem of the ‘Assumptive Worlds’ in the interpretation of DHPs
1. DWP + EWCA2. Local Authorities
YORK LAW SCHOOL
YORK LAW SCHOOL
Pot of money set aside by the DWP(£155 million pot)
Dolled out to Local Authorities
People Apply for DHPs to help them
YORK LAW SCHOOL
The Argument - Part One:
The Two ‘Assumptive Worlds’
YORK LAW SCHOOL
- Ken Young (1981)- A problem of the ‘assumptive worlds’ of
those initiating the task, and those carrying it out
- ‘Problems of implementation’ as referring to the centre’s failure to understand the values, perceptions, motivations and ‘definitions of the situation’ held by the other body
‘Assumptive Worlds’
Social Good Individual
Assumptive Worlds
YORK LAW SCHOOL
Social RightTo Housing
Benefit (Article 1:
Housing Benefit as a
possession)
Court of Appeal
Local Authoriti
es
Two Assumptive
Worlds
The DWP
YORK LAW SCHOOL
Assumptive Worlds
- Economic Policy (Thain, 1987; Dixon and Kouzmin, 2003) - Education (Marshall, 1985, 1988; Kirst et al, 2006; Humes, 2003; Bennett, 2001; Sacken and Medina, 1997; Finch and Gordon, 1989; Mazzeo, 2002)- Jurisprudence (Lacey, 1992; Kauffman, 2005) - Health (Marmor, 2013, Worth, 2001; Porter, 1989; Dopson and Fitzgerald, 2006)- Social Policy (Ham, 1980; Murray, 2006; Hill et al, 2009)
YORK LAW SCHOOL
The Assumptive World of:
DWP + Courts
YORK LAW SCHOOL
The Coalition Government Position – Giant Sticking Plaster
- ‘Discretionary pot for [local authorities] to tailor to their local and individual needs’ (Steve Webb MP)
- ‘the key is in the title’ (Stephen Williams MP)- the best way to incorporate ‘local issues’ on a ‘case
by case basis’ - local authorities are ‘best placed’ to make these
decisions ‘according to their assessment of local needs and in order to best reflect their particular circumstances’ (Lord Freud)
YORK LAW SCHOOL
R (MA & Others) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2014] EWCA Civ 13
‘Central to [the Secretary of State’s] thinking is the idea that there are certain groups of persons whose needs for
assistance with payment of their rent are better dealt with by DHPs than [housing benefit]…I consider that they
amount to an objective and reasonable justification of the scheme.’
YORK LAW SCHOOL
DHPs provide the ‘greater flexibility’ required to deal with the changing nature of ‘disability-related needs’ (para 74)…
'If read in isolation and without regard to the DHP scheme [the SSSC] plainly discriminates’ (para 39) against the disabled, so it necessary to analyse ‘the scheme as a whole.’ (para 40)
YORK LAW SCHOOL
Local Authority Assumptive World
YORK LAW SCHOOL
The other world: Local Authorities
- Behavioural and moralistic focus (ties into the responsibilisation agenda: Lister, 2014:12; McKee, 2012:855, Trnka and Trundle, 2014:3, ‘DIY project of the self’: Kelly, 2001:29)
- Widespread attachment of conditionality (Robinson, 2013; Bowpitt et al, 2013; Jacobs and Manzi, 2013)
- Potential influence of local politics (analysis of DWP data points to this)
- Huge variation between localities - geographical element to the problem
YORK LAW SCHOOL
YORK LAW SCHOOL
‘The present policy already gives consideration to the incentive and disincentive potential of
Discretionary Housing Payment decisions, in particular with regard to recognising and encouraging responsible housing choices. We would also expect to take into account other aspects of a claimant’s
behaviour, for instance in their engagement in activities to address worklessness or problematic and antisocial behaviour and in the steps they are taking to address
debts and budgeting difficulties.’
YORK LAW SCHOOL
YORK LAW SCHOOL
YORK LAW SCHOOL
An inherently local affair…
- Analysis of DWP Discretionary Housing Payment spend data, aligned with ‘predictor factors’:- Level of under-occupation- Number of Cases- Spend on other reforms (Benefit Cap + LHA reforms)
(https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/use-of-discretionary-housing-payments)
Average Level of Deduction (Bedroom Tax)
Measure combining level of under-occupation with the number of BT cases
YORK LAW SCHOOL
Role of Local Politics
Variable Unstandardised Regression Coefficient
Standardised Coefficient
Average Bedroom Tax Deduction (£)
33.865 .383*
Total number of Bedroom Tax Cases
-.060 -.446*
LHAReforms (£ Expenditure)
.002 .357*
Benefit Cap (£ Expenditure)
.003 .283*
No Overall Political Control vs Labour
45.089 .552*
Conservative vs Labour
-44.882 -.577*Note: *p < 0.05.
YORK LAW SCHOOL
Argument Part One: Summary
Two very different interpretations of the discretion in DHPs by the DWP and Court of
Appeal compared to the Local Authorities
YORK LAW SCHOOL
The Argument - Part Two:
The Problem of the Assumptive Worlds – Why it is a problem?
YORK LAW SCHOOL
Problems of Interpretation
YORK LAW SCHOOL
Problems of Function
YORK LAW SCHOOL
Policy Delivery by Discretion
Policy Delivery by Rules and Exemptions
YORK LAW SCHOOL
Problems of Agency
YORK LAW SCHOOL
The ‘street-level bureaucrat’ as a scapegoat for policy failure is a familiar
figure.(Young, 1981)