Date post: | 05-Jan-2016 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | loren-woods |
View: | 212 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Your High School Name
3-Year Achievement Results AnalysisSeptember 2013
State Accountability
Academic Performance Index (API)
State Accountability - APIAPI continues to be an important part of public school accountability in California. 1
For 2013, schools must reach an API of 770 or grow at least 5% of the difference between their Base API and 800 each year until they reach an API of 800.
2
Districts must also meet the yearly API target and reach 800 by the 2013-14 school year.
3
English-Language Arts, Mathematics, History-Social Science, and Science test results are included in the API calculation.
4
Graduation rates are also included in the high school API calculations.
5
School API 10-Year Growth Trend
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013700
720
740
760
780
800
820
840
860
880
757769
790808 815
827836
850 856868
API
3-Year API Growth Analysis – 20 Mile March
Name of SchoolBase 2010
Growth 2011
Diff. 2010-11
Base 2011
Growth 2012
Diff. 2011-12
Base 2012
Growth 2013
Diff. 2012-13
Average Growth Per Year 2010-2013
SCHOOLWIDE 644 659 15 683 690 7 690 709 19 13.7
Asian 790 799 9 811 818 7 818 836 18 11.3
Hispanic or Latino 591 610 19 642 635 -7 666 642 -24 -4.0
White 712 682 -30 706 715 9 N/A N/A N/A N/A
SES Disadvantaged 632 649 17 673 674 1 674 701 27 15.0
English Learners 623 621 -2 644 666 22 666 657 -9 3.7
Students with Disabilities 361 362 1 374 422 48 431 455 24
24.3
Summarizing Test ResultsCST
CSTs by Grade Level
CST– English/Language Arts
Grade 9 Grade 10 Grade 110
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
8071
62
7573
67
7477
70
78
2011
2012
2013
Percent of Students Scoring Proficient or Advanced
CST/CMA ELA – Sliders, Stickers, and Jumpers
Number of Students Making Proficiency Band Growth in ELA-3 -2 -1 0 +1 +2 +3
Grade 9 1 0 13 42 3 0 0
Grade 10 0 3 11 44 2 1 0
Grade 11 1 0 13 42 3 0 0
Who are your students who have/have not made proficiency band growth? What are your plans for students who have dropped one or more levels?
CST– Algebra 1
Grade 9 Grade 10 Grade 110
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
71
62
34
7367
35
77
70
31
2011
2012
2013
Percent of Students Scoring Proficient or Advanced
CST– Geometry
Grade 9 Grade 10 Grade 110
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
71
62
37
7367
43
77
70
55 2011
2012
2013
Percent of Students Scoring Proficient or Advanced
CST– Algebra 2
Grade 9 Grade 10 Grade 110
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
62
45
34
67
52
33
70
54
36
2011
2012
2013
Percent of Students Scoring Proficient or Advanced
CST– High School Summative Math
Grade 10 Grade 110
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
45
34
52
33
54
36
2011
2012
2013
Percent of Students Scoring Proficient or Advanced
CST/CMA Algebra 1 – Sliders, Stickers, and Jumpers
Number of Students Making Proficiency Band Growth in Math
-3 -2 -1 0 +1 +2 +3
Grade 9 1 0 13 42 3 0 0
Grade 10 0 3 11 44 2 1 0
Grade 11 0 2 26 230 157 19 1
Who are your students who have/have not made proficiency band growth? What are your plans for students who have dropped one or more levels?
CST/CMA Geometry – Sliders, Stickers, and Jumpers
Number of Students Making Proficiency Band Growth in Math
-3 -2 -1 0 +1 +2 +3
Grade 9 1 0 13 42 3 0 0
Grade 10 0 3 11 44 2 1 0
Grade 11 0 2 26 230 157 19 1
Who are your students who have/have not made proficiency band growth? What are your plans for students who have dropped one or more levels?
CST/CMA Algebra 2 – Sliders, Stickers, and Jumpers
Number of Students Making Proficiency Band Growth in Math
-3 -2 -1 0 +1 +2 +3
Grade 9 1 0 13 42 3 0 0
Grade 10 0 3 11 44 2 1 0
Grade 11 0 2 26 230 157 19 1
Who are your students who have/have not made proficiency band growth? What are your plans for students who have dropped one or more levels?
CST/CMA HS Summative Math – Sliders, Stickers, and Jumpers
Number of Students Making Proficiency Band Growth in Math
-3 -2 -1 0 +1 +2 +3
Grade 9 1 0 13 42 3 0 0
Grade 10 0 3 11 44 2 1 0
Grade 11 0 2 26 230 157 19 1
Who are your students who have/have not made proficiency band growth? What are your plans for students who have dropped one or more levels?
CST– Life Science (Grade 10)
Science0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
75 74 78
2011
2012
2013
Percent of Students Scoring Proficient or Advanced
CST– Biology
Grade 9 Grade 10 Grade 110
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
7568 65
74 7367
78 75 69
2011
2012
2013
Percent of Students Scoring Proficient or Advanced
CST– Chemistry
Grade 10 Grade 110
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
68 6573
6775
69
2011
2012
2013
Percent of Students Scoring Proficient or Advanced
CST– Earth Science
Grade 10 Grade 110
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
68 6573
6775
69
2011
2012
2013
Percent of Students Scoring Proficient or Advanced
CST– Physics
Grade 10 Grade 110
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
68 6573
6775
69
2011
2012
2013
Percent of Students Scoring Proficient or Advanced
CST– World History (Grade 10)
Grade 100
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
65 68 712011
2012
2013
Percent of Students Scoring Proficient or Advanced
CST– US History (Grade 11)
Grade 110
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
65 68 712011
2012
2013
Percent of Students Scoring Proficient or Advanced
CST Cluster Scores
CST Cluster Scores for English/Language ArtsBy Grade Level
Word Analysis and Vocabulary Devel-
opment
Reading Compre-hension
Literary Response and Analysis
Written Conven-tions
Writing Strategies
Grade 9 0.75 0.75 0.78 0.23 0.67
Grade 10 0.69 0.7 0.76 0.45 0.59
Grade 11 0.83 0.56 0.81 0.37 0.78
5%
15%
25%
35%
45%
55%
65%
75%
85%
CST Cluster Scores for Algebra 1
Number Properties, Opera-tions, Linear Equations
Graphing and Systems of Linear Equations
Quadratics and Polynomi-als
Functions and Rational Ex-pressions
Grade 9 0.75 0.75 0.78 0.23
Grade 10 0.42 0.56 0.43 0.38
Grade 11 0.75 0.75 0.78 0.23
5%
15%
25%
35%
45%
55%
65%
75%
CST Cluster Scores for Geometry
Logic and Geometric Proofs
Volume and Area Formulas Angle Relationships, Con-structions, and Lines
Trigonometry
Grade 9 0.75 0.75 0.78 0.23
Grade 10 0.42 0.56 0.43 0.38
Grade 11 0.75 0.75 0.78 0.23
5%
15%
25%
35%
45%
55%
65%
75%
CST Cluster Scores for Algebra 2
Polynomials and Rational Expressions
Quadratics, Conics, and Complex Numbers
Exponents and Logarithms Series, Combinatorics, Probability, Statistics
Grade 9 0.75 0.75 0.78 0.23
Grade 10 0.42 0.56 0.43 0.38
Grade 11 0.75 0.75 0.78 0.23
5%
15%
25%
35%
45%
55%
65%
75%
CST Cluster Scores for Summative HS Math
Algebra I Geometry Algebra II Probability and Statistics
Grade 10 0.42 0.56 0.43 0.38
Grade 11 0.75 0.75 0.78 0.23
5%
15%
25%
35%
45%
55%
65%
75%
AYP Growth
Significant Subgroup Data – 2013 AYP Comparison of Percent Proficient or Above – English/Language Arts
All StudentsAfrican AmericanAsianFilipinoHispanic or LatinoWhiteTwo or More RacesSocioeconomically DisadvantagedEnglish LearnersStudents with Disabilities
73.3%64.1%93.9%85.6%57.3%81.9%83.3%56.4%57.3%49.0%
201370.7%51.2%93.4%84.0%53.8%82.3%86.1%52.3%53.7%49.8%
69.3%54.7%92.6%82.8%50.0%82.6%82.3%48.5%49.6%48.2%
2011 2012Subgroup 3-Year Growth
+4+9.4+1.3+2.8+7.3-.5
+1.0+7.9+7.7+.8
Significant Subgroup Data – 2013 AYP Comparison of Percent Proficient or Above – Mathematics
All StudentsAfrican AmericanAsianFilipinoHispanic or LatinoWhiteTwo or More RacesSocioeconomically DisadvantagedEnglish LearnersStudents with Disabilities
73.3%64.1%93.9%85.6%57.3%84.8%83.3%56.4%57.3%49.0%
201370.7%51.2%93.4%84.0%53.8%82.3%86.1%52.3%53.7%49.8%
69.3%54.7%92.6%82.8%50.0%82.6%82.3%48.5%49.6%48.2%
2011 2012Subgroup 3-Year Growth
+4+9.4+1.3+2.8+7.3+2.2+1.0+7.9+7.7+.8
English Language Development
3-Year CELDT Analysis
2011 2012 2013
Beginning 0.04 0.08 0.06
Early Intermediate 0.08 0.14 0.11
Intermediate 0.21 0.39 0.39
Early Advanced 0.42 0.32 0.39
Advanced 0.26 0.07 0.05
3%
8%
13%
18%
23%
28%
33%
38%
43%
Percent of Students Redesignated English Proficient (2012-13)
2011 2012 2013
Your School Name 0.152 0.076 0.122
District 0.079 0.126 0.141
County 0.109 0.132 0.143
State 0.114 0.163 0.122
1%
3%
5%
7%
9%
11%
13%
15%
17%
Long Term English LearnersHow are EL students performing on the CELDT based on the length of time
they have been in U.S. schools?Length of Time in
U.S. SchoolsNumberPercent
Early Advanced or Advanced;
English Proficient
Early Advanced or Advanced; Not English Proficient
Intermediate Early Intermediate
Beginning Total (by Time)
6 or more years N 143 5 58 5 8 219
% 65% 2% 26% 2% 4% 90%
5 years N 7 1 1 0 0 9
% 78% 11% 11% 0% 0% 4%
4 years N 5 0 0 1 0 6
% 83% 0% 0% 17% 0% 2%
3 years or less N 2 1 1 0 4 8
% 25% 13% 13% 0% 50% 3%
Total (by level)
N 157 7 60 6 12 242
% 65% 3% 25% 2% 5% 100%
Intermediate Level English LearnersCST English-Language Arts
How are EL students at the Intermediate level on CELDT performing on the CST E/LA by grade level?
ELA CST Performance
NumberPercent
Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Total (by CST)
Far Below Basic N 0 1 0 1 2
% 0% 17% 0% 33% 7%
Below Basic N 2 2 0 1 5
% 18% 33% 0% 33% 19%
Basic N 4 2 1 1 8
% 36% 33% 0% 33% 30%
Proficient N 3 1 3 0 7
% 27% 17% 43% 0% 26%
Advanced N 2 0 3 0 5
% 18% 0% 43% 0% 19%
Total by Grade N 11 6 7 3 27
% 41% 22% 26% 11% 100%
• Who are your Intermediate EL students who are scoring Basic and Below on the CST E/LA?• What are your plans for these students?
Intermediate Level English LearnersMathematics
How are EL students at the Intermediate level on CELDT performing on the CST Mathematics by grade level?
ELA CST Performance
NumberPercent
Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Total (by CST)
Far Below Basic N 0 1 0 1 2
% 0% 17% 0% 33% 7%
Below Basic N 2 2 0 1 5
% 18% 33% 0% 33% 19%
Basic N 4 2 1 1 8
% 36% 33% 0% 33% 30%
Proficient N 3 1 3 0 7
% 27% 17% 43% 0% 26%
Advanced N 2 0 3 0 5
% 18% 0% 43% 0% 19%
Total by Grade N 11 6 7 3 27
% 41% 22% 26% 11% 100%
• Who are your Intermediate EL students who are scoring Basic and below on the CST ELA?
• What are your plans for these students?
CAHSEE – Grade 10
CAHSEE Proficiency Rates by Gender – ELA
2011 2012 2013
Schoolwide 0.75 0.75 0.78
Male 0.69 0.7 0.76
Female 0.83 0.81 0.81
5%
15%
25%
35%
45%
55%
65%
75%
85%
CAHSEE Proficiency Rates by Ethnicity - ELA
2011 2012 2013
Schoolwide 0.75 0.75 0.78
Asian 0.86 0.84 0.94
Hispanic/Latino 0.71 0.71 0.74
White 0.88 0.82 0.86
5%
15%
25%
35%
45%
55%
65%
75%
85%
95%
CAHSEE Proficiency Rates by Language Proficiency - ELA
2011 2012 2013
Schoolwide 0.75 0.75 0.78
English Only 0.78 0.79 0.78
IFEP 0.87 0.87 0.86
RFEP 0.94 0.99 0.98
EL 0.38 0.48 0.5
5%15%25%35%45%55%65%75%85%95%
CAHSEE Proficiency Rates by SES Status - ELA
2011 2012 2013
Schoolwide 0.75 0.75 0.78
SES Disadvantaged 0.84 0.86 0.81
Non SES Disadvantaged 0.72 0.72 0.78
63%
68%
73%
78%
83%
88%
CAHSEE Proficiency Rates for Special Education Students - ELA
2011 2012 2013
Schoolwide 0.75 0.75 0.78
SpEd 0.27 0.31 0.38
5%
15%
25%
35%
45%
55%
65%
75%
CAHSEE Proficiency Rates by Gender – Mathematics
2011 2012 2013
Schoolwide 0.8 0.75 0.76
Male 0.77 0.74 0.76
Female 0.82 0.77 0.76
71%
73%
75%
77%
79%
81%
CAHSEE Proficiency Rates by Ethnicity - Mathematics
2011 2012 2013
Schoolwide 0.8 0.75 0.76
Asian 0.98 0.93 0.98
Hispanic/Latino 0.74 0.69 0.7
White 0.73 0.76 0.79
5%
15%
25%
35%
45%
55%
65%
75%
85%
95%
CAHSEE Proficiency Rates by Language Proficiency - Mathematics
2011 2012 2013
Schoolwide 0.8 0.75 0.76
English Only 0.79 0.76 0.68
IFEP 0.87 0.82 0.86
RFEP 0.93 0.97 0.99
EL 0.58 0.56 0.55
5%15%25%35%45%55%65%75%85%95%
CAHSEE Proficiency Rates by SES Status - Mathematics
2011 2012 2013
Schoolwide 0.8 0.75 0.76
SES Disadvantaged 0.85 0.82 0.75
Non SES Disadvantaged 0.78 0.73 0.76
67%
69%
71%
73%
75%
77%
79%
81%
83%
85%
CAHSEE Proficiency Rates for Special Education Students - Mathematics
2011 2012 2013
Schoolwide 0.8 0.75 0.76
SpEd 0.17 0.12 0.33
5%
15%
25%
35%
45%
55%
65%
75%
AP Equity Access
Access to AP Exams (Equity)AP Data 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
# of Test Takers
# of Tests Taken
# of Tests Scored 3 or Above
Grade 11 and 12 Enrollment
Passing Rate
% of AP Students w/ Scores of 3 or Above
*Qualifying Rate
* Qualifying Rate = # Passed Tests/Grade 11 & 12 Enrollment
Other Indicators(Discipline, Attendance, SAT, ACT, Benchmarks, etc.)
How our School is Responding to the Data
• Signature Practice: – Next steps
Transition to Common Core
• Steps we are taking in 2013-14