ZOONOSES MONITORING · covers both zoonoses that are important for the public health in the whole...

1Belgium - 2015

ZOONOSES MONITORING

Belgium

TRENDS AND SOURCES OF ZOONOSES ANDZOONOTIC AGENTSIN FOODSTUFFS, ANIMALS ANDFEEDINGSTUFFS

including information on foodborne outbreaks,antimicrobial resistance in zoonotic and indicator bacteriaand some pathogenic microbiological agents

IN 2015

2Belgium - 2015

This report is submitted to the European Commission in accordance with Article 9 of Council Directive 2003/99/EC*. The information has also been forwarded to the European Food SafetyAuthority (EFSA).

The report contains information on trends and sources of zoonoses and zoonotic agents in Belgium during theyear 2015.

The information covers the occurrence of these diseases and agents in animals, foodstuffs and in some casesalso in feedingstuffs. In addition the report includes data on antimicrobial resistance in some zoonotic agentsand indicator bacteria as well as information on epidemiological investigations of foodborne outbreaks.Complementary data on susceptible animal populations in the country is also given. The information givencovers both zoonoses that are important for the public health in the whole European Union as well as zoonoses,which are relevant on the basis of the national epidemiological situation.The report describes the monitoring systems in place and the prevention and control strategies applied in thecountry. For some zoonoses this monitoring is based on legal requirements laid down by the European Unionlegislation, while for the other zoonoses national approaches are applied.

The report presents the results of the examinations carried out in the reporting year. A national evaluation ofthe epidemiological situation, with special reference to trends and sources of zoonotic infections, is given.Whenever possible, the relevance of findings in foodstuffs and animals to zoonoses cases in humans isevaluated.The information covered by this report is used in the annual European Union Summary Reports on zoonosesand antimicrobial resistance that are published each year by EFSA.

Belgium - 2015 Report on trends and sources of zoonoses

PREFACE

* Directive 2003/ 99/ EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2003 on themonitoring of zoonoses and zoonotic agents, amending Decision 90/ 424/ EEC and repealing Council Directive92/ 117/ EEC, OJ L 325, 17.11.2003, p. 31

30

25

16

44

4

15

24

TEXTFORMS 31 ANIMAL POPULATIONS 3

31.1 Populations 3

1.1.1 Information on susceptible animal population 32 DISEASE STATUS 4

2.1 TUBERCULOSIS, MYCOBACTERIAL DISEASES2.1.1 General evaluation of the national situation

2.1.1.1 Mycobacterium - general evaluation2.1.2 Mycobacterium in animals

2.1.2.1 Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTC) in animal - Deer - farmed 42.1.2.2 Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTC) in animal - Cattle (bovine animals) 5

2.2 BRUCELLOSIS 72.2.1 Brucella in animals

2.2.1.1 B. suis in animal 72.2.1.2 B. abortus in animal - Cattle (bovine animals)2.2.1.3 B. melitensis in animal - Goats2.2.1.4 B. melitensis in animal - Sheep 11

3 INFORMATION ON SPECIFIC ZOONOSES AND ZOONOTIC AGENTS 133.1 CAMPYLOBACTERIOSIS 13

3.1.1 General evaluation of the national situation 133.1.1.1 Thermophilic Campylobacter spp., unspecified - general evaluation 13

3.1.2 Campylobacter in foodstuffs3.1.2.1 Thermophilic Campylobacter spp., unspecified in food - Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus)3.1.2.2 Thermophilic Campylobacter spp., unspecified in food

3.1.3 Campylobacter in animals 163.1.3.1 Thermophilic Campylobacter spp., unspecified in animal - Gallus gallus (fowl) 16

3.2 LISTERIOSIS3.2.1 General evaluation of the national situation

3.2.1.1 Listeria - general evaluation 163.2.2 Listeria in foodstuffs 17

3.2.2.1 L. monocytogenes in food 173.3 YERSINIOSIS

3.3.1 General evaluation of the national situation 183.3.1.1 Yersinia - general evaluation 18

3.3.2 Yersinia in animals 183.3.2.1 Yersinia in animal - Pigs

3.4 TRICHINELLOSIS 193.4.1 General evaluation of the national situation 19

3.4.1.1 Trichinella - general evaluation3.4.2 Trichinella in animals 20

3.4.2.1 Trichinella in animal - Solipeds, domestic - horses3.4.2.2 Trichinella in animal - Pigs

3.5 ECHINOCOCCOSIS3.5.1 General evaluation of the national situation

3.5.1.1 Echinococcus - general evaluation 233.6 RABIES 24

3.6.1 General evaluation of the national situation3.6.1.1 Lyssavirus (rabies) - general evaluation

3.6.2 Lyssavirus (rabies) in animals3.6.2.1 Lyssavirus (rabies) in animal - Dogs

3.7 STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS METICILLIN RESISTANT (MRSA) INFECTION3.7.1 Staphylococcus in animals 26

3.7.1.1 Staphylococcus in animal 263.8 Q-FEVER

3.8.1 General evaluation of the national situation 273.8.1.1 Coxiella (Q-fever) - general evaluation 27

3.9 CYSTICERCOSIS, TAENIOSIS3.9.1 General evaluation of the national situation

3.9.1.1 Cysticerci - general evaluation3.10 SARCOCYSTOSIS

3.10.1 General evaluation of the national situation 283.10.1.1 Sarcocystis - general evaluation 28

3.11 TOXOPLASMA3.11.1 General evaluation of the national situation

3.11.1.1 Toxoplasma - general evaluation3.12 VTEC 29

3.12.1 Escherichia coli in foodstuffs3.12.1.1 Verotoxigenic E. coli (VTEC) in food 29

4 ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE INFORMATION ON SPECIFIC ZOONOSES AND ZOONOTIC AGENTS4.1 SALMONELLOSIS

4.1.1 Salmonella in foodstuffs4.1.1.1 Antimicrobial resistance in Salmonella Meat from pig4.1.1.2 Antimicrobial resistance in Salmonella Meat from poultry, unspecified

4.1.2 Salmonella in animals4.1.2.1 Antimicrobial resistance in Salmonella Cattle (bovine animals)4.1.2.2 Antimicrobial resistance in Salmonella Poultry, unspecified

4.2 CAMPYLOBACTERIOSIS4.2.1 Campylobacter in foodstuffs 34

4.2.1.1 Antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter Meat from pig 344.2.1.2 Antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter Meat from poultry, unspecified 35

4.3 ESCHERICHIA COLI, NON-PATHOGENIC 354.3.1 Escherichia coli, non-pathogenic in foodstuffs 35

4.3.1.1 Antimicrobial resistance in E.coli, non-pathogenic, unspecified Meat from pig4.3.2 Escherichia coli, non-pathogenic in animals

4.3.2.1 Antimicrobial resistance in E.coli, non-pathogenic, unspecified5 INFORMATION ON SPECIFIC MICROBIOLOGICAL AGENTS 37

5.1 CRONOBACTER 375.1.1 Cronobacter in foodstuffs

5.1.1.1 Cronobacter in food 375.2 HISTAMINE

5.2.1 Histamine in foodstuffs 375.2.1.1 Histamine in food

5.3 STAPHYLOCOCCAL ENTEROTOXINS5.3.1 Staphylococcal enterotoxins in foodstuffs 38

5.3.1.1 Staphylococcal enterotoxins in food 386 FOODBORNE OUTBREAKS 39

6.1 Outbreaks6.1.1 Foodborne outbreaks

ANIMAL POPULATION TABLESDISEASE STATUS TABLES FOR BRUCELLA

Bovine brucellosis in countries and regions that do not receive Community co-financing for eradication programmeOvine or Caprine brucellosis in countries and regions that do not receive Community co-financing for eradication programme

DISEASE STATUS TABLES FOR MYCOBACTERIUMBovine tuberculosis in countries and regions that do not receive Community co-financing for eradication programme

PREVALENCE TABLES

34

35

39

28

8

45

26

42

24

44

32

41

23

4

7

16

18

18

19

20

27

2929

32

36

37

37

10

39

4

13

4

13

2123

27

27

31

29

3030

32

36

39

4243

3738

25

27

29

30

List of Contents

64

63

53

116

97

109

111

148

127

CAMPYLOBACTERfood

COXIELLAanimal

CRONOBACTERfood

CYSTICERCUS 49animal

ECHINOCOCCUSanimal

ESCHERICHIA COLIfood

FLAVIVIRUS 53animal

HISTAMINEfood

LISTERIAfood

LYSSAVIRUS 62animal

MYCOBACTERIUManimal 63

SALMONELLAanimalfood 67feed

SARCOCYSTIS 83animal

STAPHYLOCOCCAL ENTEROTOXINS 84food 84

STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS METICILLIN RESISTANT (MRSA) 85animal 85

TRICHINELLA 86animal 86

YERSINIA 87food 87

FOODBORNE OUTBREAKS TABLESAMR TABLES FOR CAMPYLOBACTER 97

Campylobacter jejuni 97Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - carcase - Slaughterhouse - Monitoring - Official sampling - AMR MONMeat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - carcase - Slaughterhouse - Monitoring - Official sampling - AMR MON 98Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - carcase - Slaughterhouse - Monitoring - Official sampling - AMR MON 99Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - carcase - Slaughterhouse - Monitoring - Official sampling - AMR MON 100Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - fresh - Processing plant - Monitoring - Official sampling - AMR MON 101Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - fresh - Processing plant - Monitoring - Official sampling - AMR MONMeat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - fresh - Processing plant - Monitoring - Official sampling - AMR MON 103Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - fresh - Processing plant - Monitoring - Official sampling - AMR MONMeat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - fresh - Processing plant - Monitoring - Official sampling - AMR MON 105Meat from pig - carcase - Slaughterhouse - Monitoring - Official sampling - AMR MONMeat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - meat preparation - Retail - Monitoring - Official sampling - AMR MON 107Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - meat preparation - Retail - Monitoring - Official sampling - AMR MONMeat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - meat preparation - Retail - Monitoring - Official sampling - AMR MONMeat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - fresh - Retail - Monitoring - Official sampling - AMR MONMeat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - fresh - Retail - Monitoring - Official sampling - AMR MONMeat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - carcase - Slaughterhouse - Monitoring - Official sampling - AMR MON 112Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - carcase - Slaughterhouse - Monitoring - Official sampling - AMR MON 113Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - carcase - Slaughterhouse - Monitoring - Official sampling - AMR MON 114Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - carcase - Slaughterhouse - Monitoring - Official sampling - AMR MON 115Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - carcase - Slaughterhouse - Monitoring - Official sampling - AMR MON

AMR TABLES FOR SALMONELLA 117Salmonella 1,4,12:i:-

Meat from pig - carcase - Slaughterhouse - Monitoring - EFSA specifications - Official sampling - AMR MONMeat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - fresh - Slaughterhouse - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MONMeat from pig - Processing plant - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MON

Salmonella 1,4,5,12:i:-Meat from pig - carcase - Slaughterhouse - Monitoring - EFSA specifications - Official sampling - AMR MONMeat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - meat preparation - Processing plant - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MONMeat, mixed meat - minced meat - Retail - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MONOther food - Unspecified - Monitoring - EFSA specifications - Official sampling - AMR MON 123Meat from pig - Processing plant - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MON 124

Salmonella 3,19:-:-Compound feedingstuffs, not specified - final product - Farm - Control and eradication programmes - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MON 125

Salmonella 6,7:r:-Gallus gallus (fowl) - broilers - Farm - Control and eradication programmes - Official and industry sampling - AMR MON

Salmonella AbaetetubaGallus gallus (fowl) - laying hens - Farm - Control and eradication programmes - Official and industry sampling - AMR MON

Salmonella Abony 128Meat from pig - Processing plant - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MON 128

Salmonella AgonaMeat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - meat preparation - Processing plant - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MONMeat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - meat preparation - Retail - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MONGallus gallus (fowl) - broilers - Farm - Control and eradication programmes - Official and industry sampling - AMR MONMeat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - fresh - Slaughterhouse - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MON 132Gallus gallus (fowl) - broilers - Farm - Control and eradication programmes - Official and industry sampling - AMR MONMeat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - carcase - Slaughterhouse - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MONMeat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - carcase - Slaughterhouse - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MON 135

Salmonella Brandenburg 136Meat from pig - carcase - Slaughterhouse - Monitoring - EFSA specifications - Official sampling - AMR MON 136Compound feedingstuffs, not specified - final product - Farm - Control and eradication programmes - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MON

Salmonella CerroOther feed material - Processing plant - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MON 138Gallus gallus (fowl) - broilers - Farm - Control and eradication programmes - Official and industry sampling - AMR MONCompound feedingstuffs, not specified - final product - Farm - Control and eradication programmes - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MON 140

Salmonella ColindaleGallus gallus (fowl) - broilers - Farm - Control and eradication programmes - Official and industry sampling - AMR MON 141

Salmonella Derby 142Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - carcase - Slaughterhouse - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MONMeat from pig - carcase - Slaughterhouse - Monitoring - EFSA specifications - Official sampling - AMR MON 143Gallus gallus (fowl) - broilers - Farm - Control and eradication programmes - Official and industry sampling - AMR MON 144Compound feedingstuffs, not specified - final product - Farm - Control and eradication programmes - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MONMeat, mixed meat - minced meat - Processing plant - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MONMeat, mixed meat - minced meat - Retail - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MONOther food - Unspecified - Monitoring - EFSA specifications - Official sampling - AMR MONMeat from pig - Processing plant - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MON 149

Salmonella enterica, subspecies diarizonae 150Meat from goat - carcase - Slaughterhouse - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MON 150

Salmonella enterica, subspecies enterica 151Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - carcase - Slaughterhouse - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MONMeat from goat - carcase - Slaughterhouse - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MON 152

45

102

126

54

62

104

134

141

118

50

55

129

137

125

47

54

117

120

48

64

83

110

117

120

126

127

129

131

133

139

142

146147

151

51

45

47

48

55

4950

51

108

88

75

119

122121

138

130

145

106

194

180

205

200

171

221

186

Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - meat preparation - Processing plant - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MONMeat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - meat preparation - Processing plant - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MONMeat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - fresh - Slaughterhouse - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MONMeat from pig - Processing plant - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MON

Salmonella EnteritidisMeat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - meat preparation - Processing plant - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MONMeat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - meat preparation - Processing plant - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MONGallus gallus (fowl) - laying hens - Farm - Control and eradication programmes - Official and industry sampling - AMR MONGallus gallus (fowl) - broilers - Farm - Control and eradication programmes - Official and industry sampling - AMR MONCompound feedingstuffs, not specified - final product - Farm - Control and eradication programmes - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MONMeat, mixed meat - meat products - Retail - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MONMeat, mixed meat - minced meat - Retail - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MON 163Gallus gallus (fowl) - laying hens - Farm - Control and eradication programmes - Official and industry sampling - AMR MONMeat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - carcase - Slaughterhouse - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MONMeat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - carcase - Slaughterhouse - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MON 166Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - carcase - Slaughterhouse - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MONMeat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - carcase - Slaughterhouse - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MON

Salmonella GaminaraGallus gallus (fowl) - broilers - Farm - Control and eradication programmes - Official and industry sampling - AMR MON 169

Salmonella Give 170Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - meat preparation - Processing plant - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MONGallus gallus (fowl) - broilers - Farm - Control and eradication programmes - Official and industry sampling - AMR MONMeat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - fresh - Slaughterhouse - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MON 172Meat from poultry, unspecified - meat preparation - Processing plant - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MONMeat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - carcase - Slaughterhouse - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MONMeat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - carcase - Slaughterhouse - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MON 175Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - carcase - Slaughterhouse - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MON 176Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - carcase - Slaughterhouse - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MON 177

Salmonella HavanaMeat from pig - carcase - Slaughterhouse - Monitoring - EFSA specifications - Official sampling - AMR MON 178Gallus gallus (fowl) - broilers - Farm - Control and eradication programmes - Official and industry sampling - AMR MONCompound feedingstuffs, not specified - final product - Farm - Control and eradication programmes - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MONMeat, mixed meat - minced meat - Retail - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MONMeat from pig - Processing plant - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MON 182Gallus gallus (fowl) - laying hens - Farm - Control and eradication programmes - Official and industry sampling - AMR MON 183

Salmonella HvittingfossFrogs leg - Unspecified - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MON

Salmonella IdikanMeat from pig - carcase - Slaughterhouse - Monitoring - EFSA specifications - Official sampling - AMR MONGallus gallus (fowl) - laying hens - Farm - Control and eradication programmes - Official and industry sampling - AMR MONGallus gallus (fowl) - laying hens - Farm - Monitoring - active - Industry sampling - AMR MON 187Gallus gallus (fowl) - laying hens - Farm - Control and eradication programmes - Official and industry sampling - AMR MON 188

Salmonella Indiana 189Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - meat preparation - Processing plant - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MON 189Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - fresh - Slaughterhouse - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MON 190

Salmonella Infantis 191Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - carcase - Slaughterhouse - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MONMeat from pig - carcase - Slaughterhouse - Monitoring - EFSA specifications - Official sampling - AMR MON 192Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - meat preparation - Processing plant - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MON 193Gallus gallus (fowl) - laying hens - Farm - Control and eradication programmes - Official and industry sampling - AMR MONGallus gallus (fowl) - broilers - Farm - Control and eradication programmes - Official and industry sampling - AMR MON 195Compound feedingstuffs, not specified - final product - Farm - Control and eradication programmes - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MONMeat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - fresh - Slaughterhouse - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MON 197Meat, mixed meat - meat products - Processing plant - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MON 198Gallus gallus (fowl) - laying hens - Farm - Control and eradication programmes - Official and industry sampling - AMR MONMeat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - carcase - Slaughterhouse - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MONMeat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - carcase - Slaughterhouse - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MON

Salmonella JerusalemMeat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - meat preparation - Processing plant - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MON

Salmonella KentuckyMeat from pig - carcase - Slaughterhouse - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MONMeat from pig - Processing plant - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MON

Salmonella LivingstoneMeat from pig - carcase - Slaughterhouse - Monitoring - EFSA specifications - Official sampling - AMR MON 205Gallus gallus (fowl) - broilers - Farm - Control and eradication programmes - Official and industry sampling - AMR MONCompound feedingstuffs, not specified - final product - Farm - Control and eradication programmes - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MONMeat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - fresh - Slaughterhouse - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MONGallus gallus (fowl) - laying hens - Farm - Control and eradication programmes - Official and industry sampling - AMR MONGallus gallus (fowl) - broilers - Farm - Control and eradication programmes - Official and industry sampling - AMR MON 210Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - carcase - Slaughterhouse - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MON

Salmonella LondonMeat from pig - Processing plant - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MON

Salmonella Mbandaka 213Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - carcase - Slaughterhouse - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MONMeat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - meat preparation - Processing plant - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MON 214Gallus gallus (fowl) - broilers - Farm - Control and eradication programmes - Official and industry sampling - AMR MON 215Compound feedingstuffs, not specified - final product - Farm - Control and eradication programmes - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MON 216Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - fresh - Slaughterhouse - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MON 217Meat from poultry, unspecified - carcase - Retail - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MONGallus gallus (fowl) - laying hens - Farm - Control and eradication programmes - Official and industry sampling - AMR MON 219Gallus gallus (fowl) - broilers - Farm - Control and eradication programmes - Official and industry sampling - AMR MON 220Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - carcase - Slaughterhouse - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MONMeat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - carcase - Slaughterhouse - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MONMeat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - carcase - Slaughterhouse - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MON

Salmonella MeleagridisGallus gallus (fowl) - broilers - Farm - Control and eradication programmes - Official and industry sampling - AMR MON 224

Salmonella Minnesota 225Gallus gallus (fowl) - broilers - Farm - Control and eradication programmes - Official and industry sampling - AMR MON

Salmonella Montevideo 226Meat from pig - carcase - Slaughterhouse - Monitoring - EFSA specifications - Official sampling - AMR MONCompound feedingstuffs, not specified - final product - Farm - Control and eradication programmes - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MON 227Gallus gallus (fowl) - laying hens - Farm - Control and eradication programmes - Official and industry sampling - AMR MON 228Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - carcase - Slaughterhouse - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MONMeat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - carcase - Slaughterhouse - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MON 230

Salmonella Not typeableGallus gallus (fowl) - broilers - Farm - Control and eradication programmes - Official and industry sampling - AMR MON 231Gallus gallus (fowl) - laying hens - Farm - Control and eradication programmes - Official and industry sampling - AMR MON 232

Salmonella Nyborg 233Gallus gallus (fowl) - broilers - Farm - Control and eradication programmes - Official and industry sampling - AMR MON 233Gallus gallus (fowl) - laying hens - Farm - Control and eradication programmes - Official and industry sampling - AMR MON 234

Salmonella Ouakam 235Gallus gallus (fowl) - broilers - Farm - Control and eradication programmes - Official and industry sampling - AMR MON 235

Salmonella Paratyphi B 236Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - carcase - Slaughterhouse - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MONMeat from pig - carcase - Slaughterhouse - Monitoring - EFSA specifications - Official sampling - AMR MONMeat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - meat preparation - Processing plant - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MON 238Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - meat preparation - Processing plant - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MON 239Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - meat preparation - Retail - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MON 240Gallus gallus (fowl) - broilers - Farm - Control and eradication programmes - Official and industry sampling - AMR MON 241

204

161

168

179

202

165

154

206

153

174

178

202

207

199

196

155

159

167

170

181

184

203

209

213

222223224

225

231

191

157

185

158

160

162

164

169

173

184

185

218

201

203

212

211

208

212

236

226

229

237

156157

294

290

252253

255

270

284

254

276

288

342

329

Meat from poultry, unspecified - meat preparation - Processing plant - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MON 242Crustaceans - Processing plant - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MONMeat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - fresh - Slaughterhouse - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MON 244Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - carcase - Slaughterhouse - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MON 245

Salmonella RissenMeat from pig - carcase - Slaughterhouse - Monitoring - EFSA specifications - Official sampling - AMR MON 246Gallus gallus (fowl) - broilers - Farm - Control and eradication programmes - Official and industry sampling - AMR MONOther food - Unspecified - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MON 248Meat from pig - Processing plant - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MON 249Gallus gallus (fowl) - laying hens - Farm - Control and eradication programmes - Official and industry sampling - AMR MON 250

Salmonella Saintpaul 251Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - meat preparation - Processing plant - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MON 251Meat, mixed meat - meat preparation - Processing plant - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MONFrogs leg - Unspecified - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MON

Salmonella SenftenbergGallus gallus (fowl) - broilers - Farm - Control and eradication programmes - Official and industry sampling - AMR MONMeat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - fresh - Slaughterhouse - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MONGallus gallus (fowl) - laying hens - Farm - Control and eradication programmes - Official and industry sampling - AMR MON

Salmonella spp., unspecified 257Meat from pig - carcase - Slaughterhouse - Monitoring - EFSA specifications - Official sampling - AMR MON pnl2Meat from pig - carcase - Slaughterhouse - Monitoring - EFSA specifications - Official sampling - AMR MON 258Meat from goat - carcase - Slaughterhouse - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MON 259Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - meat preparation - Processing plant - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MONMeat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - meat preparation - Retail - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MONMeat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - fresh - Slaughterhouse - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MON 262Meat from poultry, unspecified - carcase - Retail - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MON 263Crustaceans - unspecified - Processing plant - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MON 264Meat from pig - Processing plant - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MONMeat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - carcase - Slaughterhouse - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MONMeat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - carcase - Slaughterhouse - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MONMeat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - carcase - Slaughterhouse - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MON 268

Salmonella TennesseeGallus gallus (fowl) - laying hens - Farm - Control and eradication programmes - Official and industry sampling - AMR MON

Salmonella ThompsonMeat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - fresh - Slaughterhouse - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MONFrogs leg - Unspecified - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MON 271Frogs leg - Unspecified - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MON 272

Salmonella TyphimuriumMeat from pig - carcase - Slaughterhouse - Monitoring - EFSA specifications - Official sampling - AMR MONGallus gallus (fowl) - broilers - Farm - Control and eradication programmes - Official and industry sampling - AMR MON pnl2Gallus gallus (fowl) - broilers - Farm - Control and eradication programmes - Official and industry sampling - AMR MON 275Compound feedingstuffs, not specified - final product - Farm - Control and eradication programmes - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MONMeat, mixed meat - minced meat - Processing plant - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MON 277Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - fresh - Slaughterhouse - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MON 278Meat from pig - Processing plant - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MON 279Turkeys - meat production flocks - Farm - Control and eradication programmes - Official and industry sampling - AMR MONMeat, mixed meat - meat preparation - Processing plant - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MONMeat, mixed meat - minced meat - Processing plant - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MONGallus gallus (fowl) - laying hens - Farm - Control and eradication programmes - Official and industry sampling - AMR MON 283Crustaceans - unspecified - Slaughterhouse - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MONMeat from bovine animals - carcase - Slaughterhouse - Monitoring - EFSA specifications - Official sampling - AMR MON 285Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - carcase - Slaughterhouse - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MON

Salmonella Typhimurium, monophasicGallus gallus (fowl) - broilers - Farm - Control and eradication programmes - Official and industry sampling - AMR MONCompound feedingstuffs, not specified - final product - Farm - Control and eradication programmes - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MON

Salmonella Urbana 289Frogs leg - Unspecified - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MON 289

Salmonella VirchowMeat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - fresh - Slaughterhouse - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MON

AMR TABLES FOR ESCHERICHIA COLIEscherichia coli, non-pathogenic, unspecified

Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - carcase - Processing plant - Monitoring - Official sampling - AMR MON pnl2 291Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - carcase - Processing plant - Monitoring - Official sampling - AMR MONMeat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - carcase - Processing plant - Monitoring - Official sampling - AMR MON pnl2 293Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - carcase - Processing plant - Monitoring - Official sampling - AMR MONMeat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - carcase - Slaughterhouse - Monitoring - Official sampling - AMR MON pnl2Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - carcase - Slaughterhouse - Monitoring - Official sampling - AMR MONMeat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - carcase - Slaughterhouse - Monitoring - Official sampling - AMR MON pnl2 297Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - carcase - Slaughterhouse - Monitoring - Official sampling - AMR MON 298Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - carcase - Slaughterhouse - Monitoring - Official sampling - AMR MON pnl2 299Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - carcase - Slaughterhouse - Monitoring - Official sampling - AMR MON 300Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - carcase - Slaughterhouse - Monitoring - Official sampling - AMR MON pnl2 301Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - carcase - Slaughterhouse - Monitoring - Official sampling - AMR MONMeat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - carcase - Retail - Monitoring - Official sampling - AMR MON pnl2 303Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - carcase - Retail - Monitoring - Official sampling - AMR MONMeat from bovine animals - fresh - Retail - Monitoring - EFSA specifications - Official sampling - AMR MON pnl2 305Meat from bovine animals - fresh - Retail - Monitoring - EFSA specifications - Official sampling - ESBL MON pnl2 306Meat from bovine animals - fresh - Retail - Monitoring - EFSA specifications - Official sampling - ESBL MONMeat from bovine animals - meat preparation - Retail - Monitoring - Official sampling - AMR MON pnl2Other food of non-animal origin - Retail - Monitoring - Official sampling - AMR MON pnl2 309Other food of non-animal origin - Retail - Monitoring - Official sampling - AMR MON 310Meat from bovine animals - meat preparation - Retail - Monitoring - Official sampling - AMR MON 311Meat from bovine animals - meat preparation - Retail - Monitoring - Official sampling - AMR MON pnl2Meat from bovine animals - meat preparation - Retail - Monitoring - Official sampling - AMR MON 313Cattle (bovine animals) - calves (under 1 year) - Slaughterhouse - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - AMR MON pnl2 314Cattle (bovine animals) - calves (under 1 year) - Slaughterhouse - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - AMR MON 315Cattle (bovine animals) - calves (under 1 year) - Slaughterhouse - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - ESBL MON pnl2 317Cattle (bovine animals) - calves (under 1 year) - Slaughterhouse - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - ESBL MONCattle (bovine animals) - meat production animals - Farm - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MON pnl2Cattle (bovine animals) - meat production animals - Farm - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MON 322Pigs - fattening pigs - Slaughterhouse - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - AMR MON pnl2 324Pigs - fattening pigs - Slaughterhouse - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - AMR MON 325Pigs - fattening pigs - Slaughterhouse - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - ESBL MON pnl2 327Pigs - fattening pigs - Slaughterhouse - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - ESBL MONGallus gallus (fowl) - broilers - Slaughterhouse - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - AMR MON pnl2 331Gallus gallus (fowl) - broilers - Slaughterhouse - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - AMR MON 332Meat from other animal species or not specified - Retail - Monitoring - Official sampling - AMR MON pnl2 334Meat from other animal species or not specified - Retail - Monitoring - Official sampling - AMR MONCrustaceans - Retail - Monitoring - Official sampling - AMR MON pnl2Crustaceans - Retail - Monitoring - Official sampling - AMR MONMeat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - fresh - Processing plant - Monitoring - Official sampling - AMR MON pnl2 338Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - fresh - Processing plant - Monitoring - Official sampling - AMR MONMeat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - fresh - Processing plant - Monitoring - Official sampling - AMR MON pnl2 340Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - fresh - Processing plant - Monitoring - Official sampling - AMR MONMeat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - fresh - Processing plant - Monitoring - Official sampling - AMR MON pnl2Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - fresh - Processing plant - Monitoring - Official sampling - AMR MON 343Crustaceans - unspecified - Retail - Monitoring - Official sampling - AMR MON 344Meat from pig - meat preparation - Retail - Monitoring - Official sampling - AMR MON 345Meat from pig - meat preparation - Retail - Monitoring - Official sampling - AMR MON pnl2

247

254

291

346

304

267

265

296

260

243

256

269269270

273

280

282

286

292

308

319

337

339

341

246

257

273

287

261

266

274

281

287

290

291

295

335

302

307

312

321

336

Meat from pig - meat preparation - Retail - Monitoring - Official sampling - AMR MON 347Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - Processing plant - Monitoring - Official sampling - AMR MON 348Meat from bovine animals - minced meat - Retail - Monitoring - Official sampling - AMR MON 349Meat from bovine animals - minced meat - Retail - Monitoring - Official sampling - AMR MONFish - raw - Retail - Monitoring - Official sampling - AMR MON pnl2 351Fish - raw - Retail - Monitoring - Official sampling - AMR MON 352Meat from pig - fresh - Retail - Monitoring - EFSA specifications - Official sampling - ESBL MON pnl2 353Meat from pig - fresh - Retail - Monitoring - EFSA specifications - Official sampling - ESBL MON 354

OTHER AMR TABLES 355Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)

Cattle (bovine animals) - calves (under 1 year) - Farm - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MON 355Cattle (bovine animals) - meat production animals - Farm - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MONCattle (bovine animals) - dairy cows - Farm - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - OTHER AMR MON 359

ESBL 361

357

350

355

3Belgium - 2015

1 ANIMAL POPULATIONS

The relevance of the findings on zoonoses and zoonotic agents has to be related to the size and nature of the animalpopulation in the country

1.1 Populations

1.1.1 Information on susceptible animal population

Sources of information

SANITEL and BELTRACE database of the Federal Agency for the Safety of the Food Chain.

Dates the figures relate to and the content of the figures

Number of animals = number of animals at a certain time point of the year. Number of slaughtered animals = total number of slaughtered animalsduring the year.

Definitions used for different types of animals, herds, flocks and holdings as well as the types covered by the information

Holding: any establishment, construction or, in the case of an open-air farm, any place in which animals are held, kept or handled. The location ofthe holding is based on the address and the coordinates of the geographical entity. A geographical entity is a unit of one building or a complex ofbuildings included grounds and territories where an animal species is or could be hold. Herd: an animal or group of animals kept on a holding as anepidemiological unit; if more than one herd is kept on a holding, each of these herds shall form a distinct unit and shall have the same healthstatus.

National evaluation of the numbers of susceptible population and trends in these figures

Over the last years, there's a important decrease in total number of holdings of bovines, porcine, sheep, goats and farmed deer. The total numberof bovine animals remains unchanged what means that the mean total number of animals per holding is increasing. The total numbers of holdingsand animals of swine, are decreasing over the last years.

Geographical distribution and size distribution of the herds, flocks and holdings

Belgium can be geographically divided into two regions: the Flemish region situated in the north and the Walloon region situated in the south of thecountry. There's a very dense animal population of bovines, swine and poultry in the Flemish region. The Walloon region is important for his cattlebreeding holdings of the Belgian Blue White race. The number of porcine and poultry holdings in the Walloon region is rather limited.

4Belgium - 2015

2 DISEASE STATUS

2.1 TUBERCULOSIS, MYCOBACTERIAL DISEASES

2.1.1 General evaluation of the national situation

2.1.1.1 Mycobacterium - general evaluation

History of the disease and/or infection in the country

Zoonotic tuberculosis (Mycobacterium bovis). Bovine tuberculosis in humans caused by M. bovis is clinically indistinguishable from humantuberculosis caused by M. tuberculosis. In the past, the most important way of transmission of M. bovis to humans was the consumption of raw milkor raw milk products from infected cattle. Industrial heating production methods or pasteurization of raw milk did stop this way of transmission tohumans.Nowadays tuberculosis in humans caused by M. bovis is rare. In regions were M. bovis infections in cattle are largely eliminated, only fewresidual cases occur among elderly persons as a result of the reactivation of dormant M. bovis within old lesions. Also among migrants from high-prevalence countries or regions, infections with M. bovis are diagnosed. Agricultural workers may acquire infection by M. bovis by inhaling coughaerosols from infected cattle and may subsequently develop typical pulmonary or genito-urinary tuberculosis. Cervical lymphadenopathy, intestinallesions, chronic skin tuberculosis (lupus vulgaris) and other non-pulmonary forms are also particularly common as clinical symptoms.

Recent actions taken to control the zoonoses

The surveillance program of tuberculosis is based on Directive 64/432/EEC, which is implemented and adapted in National legislation since 1963 andlast modified by the Royal Decree of 17 October 2002. The control implies skin testing of animals at the occasion of trade and intensive testing ofinfected and contact farms in consequence of a confirmation of a bovine TB suspicious case (tracing-on and tracing-back of all contact animals andcontact herds). Systematic ante- and post-mortem examination are performed at all slaughterhouses. The Federal Agency for the Safety of theFood chain is informed about any doubtful or positive result of the skin test of bovines and may decide to re-examine (additional tests e.g.comparative tuberculin test, interferon-gamma test) the animals or to kill them for additional analysis (test & slaughter strategy). In case a "TBsuspicious" lesion is detected, a tissue sample is sent to the National Reference Laboratory for analysis. Consequently, if Mycobacterium bovissuspicion is confirmed by a positive culture, all animals in the herd of origin are skin tested and an epidemiological investigation is realized. Thetotal herd is considered as the 'epidemiological unit'. Isolation of M. bovis and biochemical testing is exclusively performed in the National ReferenceLaboratory where also IFN-gamma, PCR and molecular typing by means of RFLP, spoligotyping or more recently MIRU-VNTR are done to supportthe epidemiological investigations and to eventually prove the link between different cases.

Suggestions to the European Union for the actions to be taken

In case a holding is infected and if by epidemiological investigation and tracing-back, animals were found to have been exported to another country,the Chief Veterinary Officer of the country of destination has to be informed about the outbreak in the country of origin. This alert can help torapidly detect an infection in the concerned holding of destination abroad.Monitoring of the type of strains circulating in each country couldcontribute to the understanding of the temporal-spatial spread of some specific strains between different countries and could possibly bear someepidemiological links between different outbreaks. More attention should be given to intracommunity trade in animals sensitive to bovinetuberculosis (e.g. camelids), especially if those animals have stayed for a time in an endemic region of tuberculosis.

2.1.2 Mycobacterium in animals

2.1.2.1 Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTC) in animal - Deer - farmed

Monitoring system

Sampling strategy

Sampling in case of suspicious TB lesions during post-mortem examinations of "wild" and "farmed" deer at slaughterhouse/ at gamehandling establishment.

5Belgium - 2015

Frequency of the sampling

Depends on the number of hunted/slaughtered animals and the detection of suspicious lesions at post-mortem examination.

Type of specimen taken

Suspicious lesions of lungs, lymph nodes, ... at slaughterhouse or game handling establishment.

Methods of sampling (description of sampling techniques)

TB suspicious tissues: lymph nodes, lungs, ...

Case definition

An animal is positive if Mycobacterium bovis is isolated by culture or confirmed by laboratory analysis.

Diagnostic/analytical methods used

- Ziehl-Neelsen coloration- Culture for isolation- Interferon-gamma - PCR on lesions / organs- PCR on culture

Control program/mechanisms

The control program/strategies in place

Monitoring is done by:- systematic post-mortem examination at the slaughterhouses/game handling establishment- post-mortemexamination at autopsy of hunted or killed "wild" deer by accident in the University Center of Lige, Veterinary Medicine Faculty. In case ofsuspected TB lesions, tissue samples are sent to the National Reference Laboratory for additional analysis to confirm the suspicion.


Surveillance program in wildlife.

National evaluation of the recent situation, the trends and sources of infection

No Mycobacterium bovis was detected in "wild/hunted" or "farmed" deer for the reporting year 2015.

2.1.2.2 Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTC) in animal - Cattle (bovine animals)

Status as officially free of bovine tuberculosis during the reporting year

The entire country free

Belgium is officially free of bovine tuberculosis since the 25th of June 2003 (Commission Decision 2003/467/EC)

Free regions

All regions are officially free of bovine tuberculosis.

Monitoring system

6Belgium - 2015

Sampling strategy

Surveillance system.The control of tuberculosis is based on Council Directive 64/432/EEC, which is implemented and adapted in Nationallegislation since 1963 and was last modified by the Royal Decree of 17 October 2002. The surveillance program implies:- skin testing of allanimals at purchase by the veterinarian responsible for the epidemiological sanitary situation of the holding (contract between farmer andveterinarian); - in case of a suspected/infected bovine(s) on a holding skin testing of all animals of the holding; - skin testing of all 'contact'animals and herds (tracing-on and tracing-back);- systematic ante- and post-mortem examination of all slaughtered bovines, transmissionto the National Reference Laboratory of all "TB suspicious" lesions for further analysis. Isolation of M. bovis and typing is performed at theNational Reference Laboratory CODA-CERVA. Also IFN-gamma, PCR and molecular typing by means of RFLP, spoligotyping and morerecently MIRU-VNTR are realised at the NRL.


Frequency of testing depends on: - the introduction of new animals into a herd (mandatory examination at purchase) - the results oftuberculin testing - the detection of suspected bovines - the detection of infected bovines - the epidemiological investigation related tosuspected or infected animals or herds (tracing-on and tracing-back) - the follow-up testing of infected and/or eradicated herds during 5years after partial or total stamping-out. This follow-up testing can be reduced to year 1, year 3 and year 5 if epidemiologicalinvestigations indicate a low risk of infection - an 'at random selection' of 200 holdings in the category of holdings with an importantnumber of purchased animals per year: tuberculination of all purchased bovines over the last year.


Organs/tissues: lesions, lymph nodes, lungs, liver, kidneys, spleen, ... Blood


Tuberculin skin testing: single (bovine tuberculin) or comparative (bovine/avian tuberculin) testing. Blood sampling: interferon-gamma testsLaboratory examination of all suspicious lesions by culture: isolation and identification Organs: lymph nodes, lungs, liver, kidneys, ...

Case definition

- A 'bovine' is defined as infected with bovine tuberculosis if the animal is positive by skin testing or if Mycobacterium bovis is isolated byculture or confirmed by laboratory analysis (PCR). - A 'holding' is defined as infected if Mycobacterium bovis was isolated by culture from ananimal of the holding.


- Simple skin test with bovine tuberculin- Comparative skin test with bovine and avian tuberculin- Ziehl-Neelsen coloration- Culture forisolation- Interferon-gamma assay- PCR on lesions / organs- PCR on culture - RFLP typing- Spoligotyping- MIRU-VNTR

Vaccination policy

Vaccination is prohibited by Royal Decree of 17 October 2002.



National surveillance program by the Competent Authority (FASFC) on a mandatory legal base.


Draw special attention and focus on the post-mortem examination of slaughtered animals;Transmission for further analysis of any lesionthat could be 'suspected' of tuberculosis to the National Reference Laboratory;Culture of M. bovis, biochemical testing, PCR are performedon these 'suspicious' lesions;Molecular typing by means of RFLP, Spogilotyping and more recently MIRU-VNTR are realised on all isolates tosupport the epidemiological investigations and to eventually prove the link between different cases or outbreaks.

7Belgium - 2015


In case of export of bovines, inform the Chief Veterinary Officer of the Member state of destination if tuberculosis has been detected in aholding of the Member State of origin after the date of export. This information can result in an early detection or can avoid a possiblefurther contamination in the Member State of destination. In 2015, a first infection of bovine tuberculosis on one Belgian alpaca holdingwas detected and confirmed by culture. The alpaca's were imported in december 2014 from a holding of Tiverton situated in the Devonregion of GB. This is an endemic bTB area with infection in both domesticated animals and wildlife.This holding of origin had a bTB incidentin 2009 in alpaca. In Belgium, the infection was detected at necropsy of one sick alpaca which presented typical tuberculous lesions indifferent organs and parts of the carcass. Euthanasia was carried out on all animals of this holding. After epidemiological investigation, 10contact herds with in total 33 animals had to be screened by a comparative tuberculination followed by a serological ELISA 14 days later.No other infected alpaca was detected. Molecular typing of the isolate resulted in a similar genotype to isolates circulating in the UK.Further follow-up of all these contact herds of alpaca will be realised by SICT and an ELISA.

Measures in case of the positive findings or single cases

If M. bovis is suspected, all animals in the herd of origin are skin tested, the herd is considered as the epidemiological unit. A completeepidemiological investigation is performed. After tracing-back and tracing-on all animals of 'contact' holdings are examined by skin testing. If anydoubtful or positive result of the skin test is detected, the FASFC may decide to re-examine the reactor animals (additional tests e.g. comparativeskin testing with avian and bovine tuberculin and/or Interferon-gamma testing) or to a direct mandatory slaughter of the reactors (test slaughter)for additional analysis. In case a suspicious lesion is detected at post-mortem examination, a sample is sent to the National reference laboratory foranalysis. If in consequence Mycobacterium bovis is isolated, all skin test positive animals during successive testing are mandatory slaughtered. Ifmany bovines are reacting positive to skin testing, the FASFC can decide that all animals of the holding must be mandatory slaughtered (totalstamping-out). In most breakdowns a sanitation plan is established taking into account the epidemiological situation. In case of partial stamping-out, only 2 sanitation plans may be realised. After stamping-out, new restocked animals are tested during 5 consecutive years by annual skin testingto prove the TB free status of the holding.

Notification system in place

Animal Health Law of 24 March 1987 Chapter III and Royal Decree of 3 February 2014 (list of all notifiable animal diseases).

Results of the investigation

In 2015, 3 outbreaks of bovine tuberculosis were detected. On the first outbreak (2015-01) a general stamping-out was applied and 162 contactherds had to be followed-up by tuberculination. Hereby two secundary outbreaks were detected with a clear epidemiological link to the primarycase. On the second outbreak (2015-02) also a general stamping-out was organized. A partial stamping-out was applied on third outbreak (2015-03). Due to this second and third outbreak respectively 10 and 39 contact herds had to be followed-up by tuberculination. Of outbreak 2015-01,2015-02 and 2015-03, respectively 8, 1 and 1 isolates where obtained by bacteriological examination.


Number of infected herds since 2000 2000 : 24 2001 : 23 2002 : 13 2003 : 7 2004 : 8 2005 : 5 2006 : 8 2007 : 5 2008 : 12 2009 : 2 2010 :0 2011: 1 2012: 1 2013: 9 2014: 0 2015:3

2.2 BRUCELLOSIS

2.2.1 Brucella in animals

2.2.1.1 B. suis in animal

Monitoring system

Sampling strategy

8Belgium - 2015

Serological screening for Brucella is done for breeding pigs that are gathered (at a fair for example), at artificial insemination centers and inanimals intended for trade. The methods used are Rose Bengal test (RBT), Slow Agglutination test (SAT) according to Wright, ComplementFixation test (CFT) and ELISA. Bacteriological examination for Brucella and Yersinia is done in case of positive serology. Regularly, falsepositive serological reactions are reported. These are due to a Yersinia enterocolitica O9 infection and are confirmed by Yersiniaenterocolitica 09 isolation in the absence of Brucella spp. isolation. B. suis biovar 2 may be isolated from wild boars (Sus scrofa). Theinfection seems to be endemic in wild boar in Belgium. B. suis biovar 2, circulating among wild boars, shows only limited pathogenicity forhumans, if pathogenic at all.The domestic pig population is free of brucellosis (last Brucella isolation in domestic pigs in Belgium was in1969).


Blood sampling Tonsils Spleen

Case definition

An animal is positive if Brucella suis is isolated by culture or typed by additional laboratory methods.


Rose Bengal test RBT Complement fixation test CFT Indirect ELISA Bacteriological examination

2.2.1.2 B. abortus in animal - Cattle (bovine animals)

Status as officially free of bovine brucellosis during the reporting year


Belgium is officially free from bovine brucellosis since the 25th of June 2003 (Commission Decision 2003/467/EC)

Free regions

Belgium remained officially free of bovine brucellosis during this reporting year.

Additional information

End 2010 a brucellosis breakdown herd was detected after analyzing an abortion. The infected herd was totally depopulated. In March2012, again a breakdown of brucellosis was detected after analysis of an abortion. No epidemiological link could be found with thebreakdown of 2010. Tracing-back and an epidemiological inquiry lead to the detection of 4 other secondary breakdowns linked to theprimary case. All these 5 brucellosis breakdown herds were infected with an identical Brucella abortus biovar 3. Another infected herd ofbrucellosis was detected by analysis of tankmilk and an infection with Brucella suis biovar 2 was confirmed. Finally there was a stamping-out of all the animals of the infected herds. In 2013 a breakdown herd was detected as contact herd of the primary breakdown herd of2012. The breakdown herd of 2013 was already examined twice by serology in 2012 with negative results. A third follow-up screening byserology indicated some positive results. This positive serology could be confirmed by culture after test and slaughter of the reactors. Finally6 bovines were infected. There was a stamping-out of all the animals of this infected herd. In 2014, bovine brucellosis was not detected bya serological follow-up surveillance of contact herds of the brucellosis incident. In 2015, no case of brucella infection was detected by a lastserological follow-up surveillance of contact herds during the winter campaign of the 2012 - 2013 brucellosis incident. Scientific advice 05-2016 of the Scientific Committee of the FASFC on the re-emergence of bovine brucellosis in Belgium was published in May 2016.

Monitoring system

Sampling strategy

9Belgium - 2015

Since Belgium is officially free of bovine brucellosis, the eradication program has been changed in a surveillance program. An animal islegally suspected of brucellosis in case of a positive ELISA. If, according to the epidemiology and the results of the blood test, an animal orherd is found to be at risk, a bacteriological investigation always takes place. Hence, a brucellosis animal is defined as an animal in whichBrucella abortus has been isolated, and a cattle holding is considered as an outbreak herd if one of the animals is positive for brucellosis bybacteriological examination.In 2009, a study was realized to evaluate the current national surveillance program of bovine brucellosis. If aMember State has maintained the officially free status of brucellosis for at least 5 consecutive years, the existing surveillance program canbe re-evaluated and some modifications on the sampling design are allowed on condition of further proof of freedom of disease (CouncilDirective 64/432/EEC). The study also clearly indicated that the best approach is to test bovines imported from officially free or non-officially free Member States of Brucella spp., to test animals at purchase in consequence of national trade as well as to analyze abortinganimals in order to early detect infection. Also the mandatory analysis for brucellosis at purchase of new animals changed into a voluntaryapproach. A new surveillance program has been applied from the end of 2009 on. In 2015, surveillance was focused on following riskcategories: - import of non officially free MSs or Third Countries at the moment of trade and follow-up testing during 3 consecutive yearsduring the winterscreening (targeted selection) - at random selection of 450 bovine herds for serological investigation of 40 animals perherd divided in 4 different age categories: 10 animals of 6-12 months of age, 10 animals of 12-24 months of age and 20 animals older then24 months. - number of analysis of bovines of national trade at purchase. - at random selection of 200 bovine herds of all herds that didnot declare any abortion during the past year and did send some lightweight bodies of newborns to the rendering plant. On these herds amaximum of 20 female animals are randomly selected for serological analysis of brucellosis. - abortion protocol: all abortion should benotified and analysed for brucellosis. - a general screening of dairy herds by an ELISA of tankmilk was realised in spring and autumn 2015.


- import of non officially free MSs or Third Countries at the moment of trade: all imported animals over 12 months of age - import of nonofficially free MSs or Third Countries follow-up testing during winterscreening for 3 consecutive years of all imported animals over 24months of age - at random selection of 450 bovine herds: at random selection of maximum 40 female animals in different age categories -bovines of national trade at purchase: at random selection, limited number of analysis - at random selection of 200 bovine herds where noabortion was declared/analyzed during the last year, at random selection of 20 female animals over 24 months of age (goal is to stimulatethe notification of abortions) - abortion protocol: examination of abortions for brucellosis and some other diseases which can induce anabortion in bovine animals (IBR, BVD, Neoplasmose, ...).


Blood samples, Tankmilk, individual milk samples


Blood sampling by veterinary practioners Tankmilk samples taken for Milk Quality Assurance at the moment of the collection of the milk bythe milk factory

Case definition

An animal is defined as infected if Brucella spp. has been isolated by culture and identified as Brucellosis. A herd is defined as infected ifone of its animals is positive by bacteriological examination for Brucellosis.


- Micro agglutination test - ELISA on blood or tank milk - Complement Fixation Test - Rose Bengale Test - PCR - Stamp/Ziehl Neelsencoloration - Culture

Vaccination policy

Vaccination is prohibited in Belgium since 1992.



National mandatory surveillance program organized by the FASFC.


10Belgium - 2015

In case of a positive result in the micro-agglutination test the same blood sample is tested with an ELISA. If this indirect ELISA is positive, this resulthas to be confirmed by a blocking ELISA at the NRL. If this confirmatory test is positive, the animal is considered as infected and is compulsoryslaughtered (test & slaughter strategy) for additional analysis to detect a possible Brucella infection by culture.


Animal Health Law of 24 March 1987 Chapter III, Royal Degree of 3 February 2014 (list of notifiable diseases)


An intensified bovine brucellosis control program started in Belgium in 1988. In case of active brucellosis, i.e. excretion of Brucella, the planconsisted in the culling of all animals of the infected herd (total depopulation). Culled bovines were compensated for based on the replacementvalue of the animals. In March 2000, the last case of bovine brucellosis was identified before obtaining the officially brucellosis free status in 2003.Incase of positive serological reactors the Federal Agency for the Safety of the Food Chain instruct follow-up testing or 'test slaughter' for additionalanalyses. These analyses could not confirm brucellosis. To reduce the number of FPSR (False positive serological reactors) to be slaughtered, themicro-agglutination test has been used as for routine testing whereas the indirect Elisa is accepted as a complementary test by serial or paralleltesting. The blocking ELISA of the NRL is considered as the confirmation test. This approach avoids the undeserved mandatory slaughter of falsepositive reacting animals. In 2015, no infected animals or herds were detected.

2.2.1.3 B. melitensis in animal - Goats

Status as officially free of caprine brucellosis during the reporting year


Belgium is officially free of B. melitensis since 29 March 2001 (Commission Decision 2001/292/EC).

Free regions

Belgium is officially free of caprine brucellosis during the reporting year.

Monitoring system

Sampling strategy

Serum samples taken in the framework of a national monitoring program for Maedi-Visna/CAE and at export were examined for Brucellamelitensis specific antibodies by means of an ELISA. Sheep and goats were tested for brucellosis by indirect ELISA(iELISA) at the NRLCODA-CERVA. All positive samples in the ELISA were supplementary tested by the Rose Bengal Test (RBT) and Complement Fixation Test(CFT) as confirmatory tests. Animals that where positive in the two confirmatory tests or that could not be analyzed and/or interpreted inRBT and/or CFT were sampled a second time.


Blood


Blood sampling

Case definition

A goat is defined as infected with brucellosis if positive in all three tests: iElisa, Rose Bengal test and Complement Fixation test and isolationof Brucella melitensis by culture after test slaughter.


11Belgium - 2015

Complement Fixation Test CFT Rose Bengal Test RBT Indirect ELISA Culture for isolation


Animal Health Law of 24 March 1987 Chapter III and Royal Decree of 3 February 2014 (list of notifiable animal diseases)


At the NRL, 7.146 caprine/ovine serum samples were tested. The results confirmed those of previous years, i.e. the absence of any epidemiologicalor bacteriological evidence of caprine/ovine brucellosis in Belgium.

2.2.1.4 B. melitensis in animal - Sheep

Status as officially free of ovine brucellosis during the reporting year


Belgium is officially free from B. melitensis since 29 March 2001 (Commission Decision 2001/292/EC).

Free regions

Belgium is officially free of ovine brucellosis during the reporting year.

Monitoring system

Sampling strategy

Serum samples taken in the framework of a national monitoring program for Visna-Maedi/CAE and at export were examined for Brucellamelitensis specific antibodies by means of an iELISA. Positive samples were subsequently tested in Rose Bengal and in complement fixationtest. Sheep and goats sera were tested for brucellosis by indirect ELISA (iELISA) at the NRL. All positive samples in the ELISA were thantested by the Rose Bengal Test (RBT) and Complement Fixation Test (CFT) as confirmatory tests. Animals that were positive in the twoconfirmatory tests or that could not be analyzed and/or interpreted in RBT and/or CFT were sampled a second time.


Blood

Case definition

A sheep is defined as infected with brucellosis if positive in all three tests: the Elisa, the Rose Bengal test and the Complement Fixation testand isolation of Brucella melitensis by culture.


- Indirect ELISA - Rose Bengal Test RBT - Complement Fixation Test CFT - Culture for isolation - Brucellin skin test (BST)


Animal Health Law of 24 March 1987 Chapter III and Royal Decree of 3 February 2014 (list of notifiable animal diseases).


12Belgium - 2015

At the National Reference Laboratory, 7,146 caprine/ovine serum samples were tested. The results confirmed those of previous years, i.e. theabsence of any epidemiological or bacteriological evidence of caprine/ovine brucellosis in Belgium.

13Belgium - 2015

3 INFORMATION ON SPECIFIC ZOONOSES AND ZOONOTIC AGENTS

Zoonoses are diseases or infections, which are naturally transmissible directly or indirectly between animals and humans.Foodstuffs serve often as vehicles of zoonotic infections. Zoonotic agents cover viruses, bacteria, fungi, parasites or otherbiological entities that are likely to cause zoonoses.

3.1 CAMPYLOBACTERIOSIS


3.1.1.1 Thermophilic Campylobacter spp., unspecified - general evaluation


Campylobacteriosis is a leading bacterial foodborne gastrointestinal disease in humans in all parts of the world. It can also cause post-infectiouscomplications as Guillain-Barr syndrome. In 80% of the cases, the infection route of campylobacteriosis is food, but domestic animals including petscan also be involved. The transmission of this pathogen to humans is mostly due to consumption of undercooked poultry, pork and beef,unpasteurized milk, contaminated drinking water, or contacts with the faeces of infected pets. This report will focus on Campylobacter jejuni andCampylobacter coli that are the principal strains causing enteritis in humans. The contamination with Campylobacter of poultry carcasses and meatis monitored since 2000 by the Federal Agency for the Safety of the Food Chain. The rate of positive poultry samples is stable, but high. Chickenand layer meat have to be well cooked and cross-contamination should be avoided during preparation. The number of Campylobacterioses is rising.

3.1.2 Campylobacter in foodstuffs

3.1.2.1 Thermophilic Campylobacter spp., unspecified in food - Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus)

Monitoring system

Sampling strategy

At slaughterhouse and cutting plant

Campylobacter spp. contamination of broiler meat in Belgian is evaluated in slaughterhouses and cutting plants. Campylobacter iscounted on carcasses and cuts of poultry.



Sampling distributed evenly throughout the year.

At meat processing plant

14Belgium - 2015


At retail




Neck skin samples and cuts of broilers with and without skin.


Meat, minced meat, sausages and other.

At retail

Meat, minced meat, sausages and other.



The matrices were carcasses, cuts and meat preparation of broilers. The Campylobacter spp. contamination levels were analyzed in1g carcasses, 1g cutting meat and 1g meat preparation.


The samples contained about 200 g of meat. The amount of Campylobacter has been assessed in 1g of sample.

At retail

The amount of Campylobacter spp. has been assessed in 1g of sample.

Definition of positive finding


A sample is considered positive in case of detection of more than 1.000 cfu/g Campylobacter for carcases and meat with skin andin case of detection of more than 100 cfu/g Campylobacter for meat without skin.


A sample is considered positive in case of detection of more than 100 cfu/g Campylobacter in the sample (1.000 cfu for carcasesand meat with skin).

At retail

A sample is considered positive in case of detection of more than 100 cfu/g Campylobacter in the sample (1.000 cfu for carcasesand meat with skin).

15Belgium - 2015



detectie: ISO 10272-1:2006 CAMPYLOBACTER telling: ISO/TS 10272-2:2006 CAMPYLOBACTER

3.1.2.2 Thermophilic Campylobacter spp., unspecified in food

Monitoring system

Sampling strategy

carcasses and meat are sampled, as well as some RTE foods like raw milk cheeses.


samples are taken throughout the year.


meat and dairy products


Sampling of pork carcasses was done by means of swabs (4 areas from the same half carcass constituting 600 cm2 were putted in thesame stomacher bag). The carcass samples of broiler and layer consisted of 10g of neck skin. The other samples were about 200g of meat.10g to 25g representative of the whole sample were weighted in the laboratory, and the detection of Campylobacter has been assessed inthese quantities or dilutions: 25g for pork minced meat, 600 cm2 (pork carcasses), 0,01g for chicken carcasses and layer carcasses, 1g forchicken meat preparation, and for chicken cuts, 0,1g and 25g.No pooling has been done.


FASFC has established action limits. For RTE products the limit is < 10 cfu/g, For poultry with skin the limit is 1000 cfu/g. For poulltrywithout skin the limit is 100 cfu/g,


Detaction: Microbiology of food and animal feeding stuffs -- Horizontal method for detection and enumeration of Campylobacter spp. -- Part1: Detection method Enumeration: Microbiology of food and animal feeding stuffs -- Horizontal method for detection and enumeration ofCampylobacter spp. -- Part 2: Colony-count technique


Measures to be taken in the case of a non-compliant result:- Notification of the producer or importer- Possibility of a counter analysis- Destructionof the non compliant batch if it is an RTE product. Further investigation: additional sampling, possible recall, RASFF, ... If it concerns NRTE food:hygiene measures must be taken.


No specific information.

16Belgium - 2015

3.1.3 Campylobacter in animals

3.1.3.1 Thermophilic Campylobacter spp., unspecified in animal - Gallus gallus (fowl)

Monitoring system


At slaughter



At slaughter

caecal samples are taken.


At slaughter

10 caeca pairs are pooled to one sample. 6 samples are taken of each examined flock. The caeca are emptied at the laboratory.The content is examined for Cambylobacter spp.

Case definition

At slaughter

A sample is positive if Campylobacter spp. is detected.


Samples are taken for monitoring purposes only. No measures are taken in case of positive findings. The producer gets a warning and hygienemeasures must be taken.

3.2 LISTERIOSIS


17Belgium - 2015

3.2.1.1 Listeria - general evaluation


The prevalence of Listeria monocytogenes in food has not changed in comparaison to previous years. A trend analysis was performed on the datafrom 2012 to 2015 in some foodstuffs, namely: milk and products thereof, eggs and products thereof , meat and products thereof. No trend couldbe observed in these products.


General food hygiene rules are essential for the prevention of human listeriosis. As some persons are at high risk (pregnant women), they areadvised not to eat certain categories of food with proven elevated risk of Listeria monocytogenes contamination, such as unpasteurized milk andbutter, soft cheeses and ice cream made from unpasteurized milk, any soft cheese crust, smoked fish, pat, cooked ham, salami, cooked meat injelly, raw minced meat from beef, pork and poultry, steak tartar, raw fish and shellfish (oysters, mussels, shrimps), fish, meat and surimi salads,insufficiently rinsed raw vegetables, unpeeled fruit.

3.2.2 Listeria in foodstuffs

3.2.2.1 L. monocytogenes in food

Monitoring system


At retail

Samples are taken according to the national control program or in the frame of RASFF, complaints or suspicion. Samples are takenalong the whole food chain.


At retail

Different kind of products susceptible to Listeria monocytogenes are sampled and analysed: soft and semi-hard (soft) cheeses, ice-creams, RTE meals, meat preparations and meat products, ...


At the production plant

A sample is considered to be positive after confirmation of Listeria monocytogenes (detection or enumeration).

At retail

A sample is considered to be positive after confirmation of Listeria monocytogenes (enumeration).

18Belgium - 2015


At the production plant

ISO 11290-2:1998(Horizontal method for the detection and enumeration of Listeria monocytogenes -- Part 2: Enumeration method)and ISO 11290-2:1998/Amd 1:2004 (Modification of the enumeration medium )or IMMUNOFLUORENSCENCE ASSAY TESTS (IFA)

At retail

ISO 11290-2:1998(Horizontal method for the detection and enumeration of Listeria monocytogenes -- Part 2: Enumeration method)and ISO 11290-2:1998/Amd 1:2004 (Modification of the enumeration medium )



see MANCP.


Notification is mandatory since 1/3/2004 (Ministerial Decree on mandatory notification in the food chain of 22/1/2004). For Listeria monocytogenes,the criterion of 100 cfu/g in ready-to-eat food put on the market may not be exceeded. Laboratories have to inform the Federal Agency for theSafety of the Food Chain in case of a positive sample.

3.3 YERSINIOSIS


3.3.1.1 Yersinia - general evaluation

Relevance of the findings in animals, feedingstuffs and foodstuffs to human cases (as a source of infection)

Carcasses and minced meat from pigs and other animals like bovine are sampled and analysed. On the data of 2012 to 2015 a trend analysis wasperformed. There is no trend in the data to be observed. About 10% of the samples are positive, but it especially concerns sero/biotypes notpathogenic for humans.

3.3.2 Yersinia in animals

3.3.2.1 Yersinia in animal - Pigs

Monitoring system

19Belgium - 2015

Sampling strategy

Animals at slaughter (herd based approach)

A monitoring program is organized by FASFC to evaluate the level of Yersinia enterocolitica contamination of pigs carcases inBelgian slaughterhouses. The analysis of minced meat are part of the annual control program.



Sampling is distributed evenly throughout the year



Surface of carcases are sampled



swabs are taken.

3.4 TRICHINELLOSIS


3.4.1.1 Trichinella - general evaluation


Since 1940, the Competent Authority did organize analysis for Trichinella in pigs at the slaughterhouses. The analysis is generalized since 1991.Trichinella has not been detected in carcasses of pigs and horses produced for human consumption in Belgium. One autochthonous humanoutbreak, involving 4 people belonging to the same family, occured in 1979. This outbreak was most likely caused by a home raised wild boar .


20Belgium - 2015

Trichinellosis is virtually absent in Belgian domestic livestock. Since systematic controls of pigs and horses are done at slaughter (Regulation EC N2075/2005) no positive case were found. The last autochtonous outbreak in humans in Belgium occurred in 1979 following the consumption of meatfrom a home raised wild boar. At the end of 2014, Belgium experienced an outbreak of Trichinellosis, affecting 16 people. this outbreak was mostlikely caused by the consumption of infected imported Spanish wild boar. Increased monitoring in Belgium, during the last decade, has shown thatTrichinella spp. still circulate amongst wildlife, although both the prevalence and the intensity of infections are low. EU Directive requires that alsowild boars hunted in the EU for commercial purpose are examined for Trichinella. Each year about 10.000 sport-hunted wild boars are tested. Theroutine examination of wild boars devoted to the market has proven to be a good measure to protect the consumer against sylvatic trichinellosis. Inaddition, monitoring of infection through examination of sentinel animals, such as the fox, is recommended to assess the prevalence of trichinellosisand to follow trends in time. Serological examination might be an alternative for muscle digestion in screening programs, but can not be used insafeguarding consumer's health in meat inspection. An extra measure to protect the consumer is to eat meat of wild boar "well done", or to freezethe meat at -20C for 4 weeks. An important measure to avoid spreading of the infection among wildlife is not to leave offal of animal carcasses inthe field during hunting.


The last autochtonous outbreak in humans in Belgium occurred in 1979 following the consumption of meat from wild boar. At the end of 2014,Belgium experienced an outbreak of Trichinellosis, affecting 16 people. This outbreak was most likely caused by the consumption of infectedimported Spanish wild boar.


Monitoring of wildlife. Routine examination of wild boar destined for human consumption. Monitoring of infection through examination of sentinelanimals such as the fox was not further realized since 2013. Recommendation to consume wild boar meat only after freezing at -20C for 4 weeks.Recommendation to travellers not to import raw meat products of unknown origin and of susceptible animals, e.g. home-made sausages, and not toconsume meat of unknown quality abroad.


The status "negligible risk for Trichinella in slaughterpigs kept under industrial housing conditions" was granted by the EC to Belgium end December2010.

3.4.2 Trichinella in animals

3.4.2.1 Trichinella in animal - Solipeds, domestic - horses

Monitoring system

Sampling strategy

Permanent post-mortem surveillance of all slaughtered animals at the slaughterhouses or hunted animals at the game processing plants.


Sampling of all slaughtered animals at the slaughterhouses and hunted animals at the game processing plants.


Diaphragm, tongue or masseter muscle.


Horses: 5 gram of diaphragm (or tongue, or masseter) for routine diagnosis, analyses on pooled samples; 10 to 25 gram for examination ofindividual samples.

21Belgium - 2015

Case definition

An animal is considered positive in case of detection and identification of Trichinella larvae in the muscle sample.


Artificial digestion method of collective or individual samples. The magnetic stirrer method for digestion of pooled samples as described inCommission Implementing Regulation (EC) No 2015/1375 was used on samples of 5 gram of muscles from horses.



Commission Implementing Regulation (EC) No 2015/1375 imposes systematic Trichinella examination of all slaughtered pigs, horses andwild boar and other wildlife animals by artificial digestion method of muscle before marketing.


Carcasses found positive are declared unfit for human consumption.


Notification to the Federal Agency for the Safety of the Food Chain is compulsory for any positive test result.

Results of the investigation including the origin of the positive animals

One positive wildboar was detected by the end of 2015 at a hunting party in the province of Lige.


No positive horses were found in 2015.

3.4.2.2 Trichinella in animal - Pigs

Officially recognised regions with negligible Trichinella risk

At the end of 2010 Belgium was granted the status of 'negligible Trichinella risk' in pig population by the European Commission

Monitoring system

Sampling strategy

General

Permanent surveillance of all slaughtered fattening and breeding pigs 'raised under controlled housing conditions' at theslaughterhouses in implementation of Commission Implementing Regulation (EC) No 2015/1375. Derogation is foreseen forfattening pigs who do apply for the criteria set in the definition 'Region with negligible risk'.


22Belgium - 2015

General

Systematic Trichinella examinations of all slaughtered fattening and breeding pigs raised under controlled housing conditions, withthe exception of some fattening pigs who do apply for the criteria set in the definition 'Region with negligible risk'.

For regions with negligible Trichinella risk

Systematic Trichinella examinations of all slaughtered pigs, with the exception of some fattening pigs who do apply for the criteriaset in the definition 'Region with negligible risk'.


General

Diaphragm muscle, 1 gram for fattening pigs, 2 grams for sows and boars.


Diaphragm muscle, 1 gram for fattening pigs, 2 grams for sows and boars. No samples are examined of fattening pigs who doapply to the criteria set in the definition of 'Region with negligible risk'.


General

Fattening pigs: 1 gram of diaphragm muscle to be pooled (up to 100 animals in 1 pool). Sows and boars: 2 grams of diaphragmmuscle to be pooled (up to 50 animals in 1 pool).


Still almost all pigs are sampled and tested, because of logistic reasons and possible export outside EU.

Case definition

General

An animal is considered positive in case of detection and identification of Trichinella larvae in a muscle sample by the referencemethod of detection (magnetic stirrer method for pooled sample digestion). Confirmation of positive results by the digestionmethod can be done by PCR in the National Reference Laboratory on Trichinellosis.


An animal is considered positive in case of detection and identification of Trichinella larvae in a muscle sample.


General

23Belgium - 2015

Artificial digestion method of collected samples and Magnetic stirrer method for pooled samples : sedimentation or on filter isolationtechnique and larvae detection by a latex agglutination test (equivalent method). The analysis is done by artificial digestion: themagnetic stirrer method of pooled 100 gram sample as described in Commission Implementing Regulation (EC) No 2015/1375,reference method, 1 gram per fattening pig, 2 grams per sow and boar, and 5 grams per horse and per wild boar. Serology may bedone for epidemiological studies in live pigs and for monitoring of wildlife. Confirmation of positive results by the digestionmethod can be done by PCR in the National Reference Laboratory on Trichinellosis.


Carcasses found positive are declared unfit for human consumption.


Notification to the Federal Agency for the Safety of the Food chain is compulsory for any positive test result.


Trichinellosis is notifiable for all susceptible animal species. No positive cases were found in 2015 in domestic fattening and breeding pigs. Onepositive case of Trichinella spiralis was found by the end of 2015 in a wildboar during the hunting season.

Results of the investigation including description of the positive cases and the verification of the Trichinella species

Fattening pigs raised under controlled housing conditions in integrated production system

One positive case of Trichinella spiralis was detected in 2015 on a wildboar during the hunting season. This animal was found positive bythe reference method of detection and this positive result was confirmed by PCR at the NRL of Trichinellosis.

Fattening pigs not raised under controlled housing conditions in integrated production system

No positive cases were found in 2015 in slaughtered fattening pigs raised under controlled housing conditions.

Breeding sows and boars

No positive cases were found in 2015 in slaughtered breeding pigs raised under controlled housing conditions.


Since 1992, when the European Union Council Directive required that wild boars (Sus scrofa) hunted in EU for commercial purpose should beexamined for Trichinella, the infection has only been detected five times in wild boars of Belgium. There is serological evidence of the presence ofanti-Trichinella antibodies in wildlife.

3.5 ECHINOCOCCOSIS


3.5.1.1 Echinococcus - general evaluation


24Belgium - 2015

At the slaughterhouses, a small number of carcasses showing lesions of Echinococcus (cysts) are from time to time detected and notified to theFederal Agency for the Safety of the Food Chain. In case of positive findings, depending on the extent of the lesions, carcasses are partially ortotally rejected and declared unfit for human consumption.


Echinococcosis is caused either by Echinococcus granulosus or Echinococcus multilocularis. Echinococcus granulosus produces unilocular humanhydatidosis. The adult stage is a small tapeworm (6 mm) that lives in the small intestine of domestic and wild canids. Sheep and cattle serve asintermediate hosts for the infection. Humans acquire infection by ingestion of typical taeniid eggs, which are excreted in the faeces of infected dogs:the oncospheres liberated from the eggs migrate via the bloodstream to the liver, lungs and other tissues to develop in hydatid cysts. Indigenousunilocular hydatidosis in man has been reported in Belgium. In 2015 no cysts were found by post-mortem inspection of the carcasses at theslaughterhouses. Echinococcus multilocularis causes alveolar (multilocular) echinococcosis in humans. Foxes and dogs are the definitive hosts of thisparasite and small rodents the intermediate hosts. In the liver of rodents the invasive larval stage has a multi-compartimented appearancecontaining many protoscolices. Ingestion of the eggs by humans can result in the development of invasive cysts in the liver. In Belgium, thepercentage of infected foxes varies with the region, with a decreasing rate from the South-East to the North-West: e.g 33% in the Ardennes, 13%in the Condroz region and 1-2% in Flanders Region. The endemic region is situated under the river Meuse, on the heights of the Ardennes in theWalloon Region.


Post mortem visual examination is performed at the slaughterhouses in the domestic intermediate hosts: cattle, sheep, horses and pigs . Wholecarcasses or parts are rejected in case Echinococcus granulosus cysts are found.


Consumption of berries is discouraged by warning messages, displayed to visitors of Parks and Woodlands.

3.6 RABIES


3.6.1.1 Lyssavirus (rabies) - general evaluation


Since the last indigenously acquired case of rabies occurred in Belgium in a bovine coming from Bastogne (province of Luxembourg) in July 1999,Belgium obtained the official status of rabies-free country in July 2001 according to the WHO recommendations (1992) and the Office Internationaledes Epizooties (OIE) guidelines (1997).


In October 2007, Belgium lost temporary its official status of rabies free country due to a positive case of rabies in a dog, illegally imported fromMorocco.Belgium regained again its official free status of rabies on 28 October 2008.


Surveillance system and methods used. Domestic animals with nervous symptoms suspected of rabies have to be notified to the Federal Agency forthe Safety of the Food chain. Wildlife found dead or shot should also be notified and send for analysis to the Scientific Institute of Public Health, theNational Reference laboratory of rabies. Collection of dead-found bats is recommended for rabies surveillance.Live suspected animals are killed andtheir brain is examined by immunofluorescence and virus cultivation in neuroblasts at the Scientific Institute of Public Health. The high percentageof examinations of cattle is in consequence of the surveillance system for TSE in cattle: all suspected BSE cases were first examined for rabies.Rabies must be considered in the differential diagnosis of BSE, although the clinical course of rabies is usually quicker than the evolution of clinicalnervous symptoms in case of BSE.The oral vaccination campaign of foxes with vaccine baits started in 1989 and was stopped by the end of 2003.Inthe southern part of the country, below the rivers Sambre and Meuse, vaccination of dogs and cats is compulsory. In addition, all pets staying onany Belgian public camping must be vaccinated.

25Belgium - 2015


It is highly recommended to report on the rabies virus type detected to be able to differentiate between the classical rabies type (genotype 1) andthe European bat Lyssa virus types (unspecified or EBL 1 or EBL 2). Bat rabies is of public health concern. The public should be made aware of thedanger of human exposure to bats, especially in case of abnormal behavior of bats. Rabies is transmitted to humans and other animals throughsaliva, usually by a bite. Any person exposed to bats should be previously vaccinated against rabies. Nobody should handle diseased or dead batswithout protection such as gloves. Any person finding a bat behaving abnormally, in an unusual place, or under unusual circumstances, should notattempt to handle or to move the animal but should contact official authority. Education and recommendations should be given to travelers in orderto reduce their risk of infection. Although dogs represent a more serious threat in many countries, yet the risk of rabies infection by bat bites alsoexists.Pre-exposure vaccination should be offered to persons at risk, such as laboratory workers, veterinarians, animal handlers, internationaltravelers. Currently available vaccines are safe and effective against both the classical rabies virus and the bat Lyssa viruses.

3.6.2 Lyssavirus (rabies) in animals

3.6.2.1 Lyssavirus (rabies) in animal - Dogs

Monitoring system

Sampling strategy

The brain of dogs with nervous symptoms suspected of rabies are examined by direct immunofluorescence test and virus cultivation inneuroblasts at the Scientific Institute of Public Health, the National Reference Laboratory for rabies.


All suspected dogs with clinical nervous symptoms are tested.


Brain tissues


Small animals: head / carcassHuge animals: brain (CNS)Shipping and packaging conditions:Brains are transported as soon as possible(refrigerated if possible) in a tightly sealed packet to the National Reference Laboratory. In case of transport of a carcass, an authorizationis required. The storage period of samples at the National Reference Laboratory for further analysis is one year.

Case definition

An animal is considered infected in case of a positive direct immunofluorescence test (Antigen detection) confirmed by cell cultivation of thevirus or detection by RT-PCR or (rarely performed) by mice inoculation test (clinical observation of rabies symptoms).


Direct immunofluorescence for the detection of viral antigen, virus isolation in neuroblastoma cell culture, detection by RT-PCR, mouseinoculation test

Vaccination policy

In the Southern part of the country, below the rivers Sambre and Meuse, vaccination of dogs and cats is compulsory. In addition, all pets staying onany Belgian public camping must be vaccinated. Oral vaccination of foxes by baits started in 1989.Since there were no more cases of rabies for thelast years, oral vaccination of foxes by baits was stopped by the end of 2003.

26Belgium - 2015


In case of positive findings national legislation has to be applied (Royal Decree of 10 February 1967, Royal Decree of 22 May 2005 and MinisterialDecree of 23 February 1967).


Royal Decree of 10 February 1967, Animal Health Law of 24 March 1987 Chapter III and Royal Decree of 3 February 2014 (list of all notifiableanimal diseases)Notification of all laboratory confirmed cases to the competent Authority is mandatory.

3.7 STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS METICILLIN RESISTANT (MRSA) INFECTION

3.7.1 Staphylococcus in animals

3.7.1.1 Staphylococcus in animal

Monitoring system

Sampling strategy

In 2015, the monitoring of the presence of MRSA and its antimicrobial resistance was performed in bovines, (veal calves, dairy farms andmeat production farms) . The number of holdings to be sampled was based on the results of the same monitoring in 2012.


The samples were taken evenly divided over the year. A mixed sample is taken of at least 10 animals on each farm. The monitoring isrepeated every 3 years.


10 nasal swabs were taken on each holding and pooled to one sample.

Case definition

A holding is positive when MRSA is detected and confirmed by PCR.


Pooled samples were incubated in Mueller-Hinton (MH) broth (Becton Dickinson) supplemented with NaCl (6.5%) at 37C for 18-24h. One mlof this broth was added to Tryptic Soy Broth (TSB) supplemented with cefoxitin (3.5 mg/l) and aztreonam (75 mg/l) and incubated at 37Cfor 18-24h. Ten microliter of this enrichment was plated on Brilliance MRSA 2 (Oxoid) and incubated 18-24h at 37C. Presence of MRSA wassuspected based on colony morphology. Per sample, one to five suspected colonies were selected from the Brilliance MRSA 2 plate.Presence of MRSA was confirmed using a triplex real-time PCR method. Per sample, one to five suspected colonies were selected from theBrilliance MRSA 2 plate. DNA was extracted as described in SOP/BAC/ANA/18. The PCR allows detecting the Staphylococcal aureus specificgene, nuc, the presence of the mecA gene responsible for methicillin resistance and the variant mecC gene. All MRSA isolates were spa-typed by sequencing the repetitive region of the spa gene encoding for the staphylococcal protein A. This method depicts the rapidevolution, since through recombination, the repeats may change fast. The protein A (spa) gene was amplified according to the RidomStaphType standard protocol (www.ridom.de/staphtype) and the amplification was checked on a 2% agarose gel. Sequencing wasperformed with CEQ 8000 using standard protocols and sequences were compared with the international Ridom database. CC398 PCR wasperformed on all MRSA following protocol described by Stegger et al. 2011. This method allows the rapid detection of the S. aureussequence type ST398.

27Belgium - 2015


There are no measures linked to positive findings. However, farmers are informed of the presence of MRSA on the holding and on possiblemeasures to protect themselves. General hygiene and biosecurity measures are promoted.


MRSA prevalence data in cattle for 2015 are hard to compare with the 2012 data because of a higher sensitivity of the used isolation method in2015 (CODA-CERVA, 2012). Therefore, the higher MRSA prevalence in 2015 than in 2012 for veal calves (78.2% and 47.1% respectively) and forbovines for meat (16.5% in 2015 and 10.2% in 2012) should be interpreted with caution. For dairy cows, only a very slight increase can beobserved between 2012 and 2015 (9.9% in 2012 and 10.4% in 2015). In general, for all cattle categories, the similar proportional increase in theMRSA prevalence between 2012 and 2015, might affirm the observed differences as a result of different isolation methods. Also, unequal samplesizes between 2012 and 2015 should be taken into account when comparing the data (for veal calves: 104 and 147 samples in 2012 and 2015respectively; for bovines for meat production: 187 and 103 in 2012 and 2015 respectively; for dairy cattle: 141 and 96 in 2012 and 2015respectively).

Relevance of the findings in animals to findings in foodstuffs and to human cases (as a source of infection)

MRSA prevalence in all cattle categories is generally higher than in poultry, for which the level of occurrence was 2.45% in 2014, using identicalisolation methods (total number of samples was 326) (CODA-CERVA, 2014). The high level of MRSA in veal calves surpasses the MRSA presence infattening pigs in 2013 (65.5% out of 328 samples), but less sensitive methods were then used (CODA-CERVA, 2013).

3.8 Q-FEVER


3.8.1.1 Coxiella (Q-fever) - general evaluation


In 2015, the monitoring of bulk milk continued. The farms with milkgoats and milkewes were tested every 2 months.For cattle, sheep and goats, incase of abortion, samples are tested against a number of possible infectious agents including Coxiella burnetii. The circulation of Coxiella burnetii oncattle farms is known due to the presence of antibodies against Coxiella burnetii in the milk.

3.9 CYSTICERCOSIS, TAENIOSIS


3.9.1.1 Cysticerci - general evaluation


28Belgium - 2015

Cattle: Taenia saginata: 2002 in total 3.336 (3.317 lightly, 18 heavily contaminated); 2003 in total 3.886 (3.859 lightly, 25 heavily contaminated);2004 in total 3.002 (2.981 lightly, 21 heavily contaminated); 2005 in total 2.392 (2.376 lightly, 16 heavily contaminated); 2006 in total 1.824(1.796 lightly, 28 heavily contaminated); 2007 in total 1.527 (1.517 lightly, 10 heavily contaminated); 2008 in total 2.374 (2.356 lightly, 18 heavilycontaminated); 2009 in total 1.820 (1.811 lightly, 9 heavily contaminated); 2010 in total 1.766 (1.756 lightly, 10 heavily contaminated); 2011 intotal 1.347 (1.336 lightly, 11 heavily contaminated); 2012 in total 1.214 (1.205 lightly, 9 heavily contaminated); 2013 in total 994 (978 lightly, 16heavily contaminated); 2014 in total 1.172 (1.154 lightly, 18 heavily contaminated) and 2015 in total 1.253 (1,242 lightly, 11 heavilycontaminated). Pigs The Belgian pig population is free of Cysticercus cellulosae. Taenia solium (and Cysticercus cellulosae) is not autochthonous inBelgium.


Cysticercus bovis in muscular tissue of cattle is the larval stage of the tapeworm, Taenia saginata, a parasitic cestode of the human gut (taeniasis).Cattle can become infected by ingestion of vegetation contaminated with T. saginata eggs shed in human faeces. Risk factors are access to riversand flooding of pastures or wetland. Humans contaminate themselves by the ingestion of raw or undercooked beef containing the larval form(cysticerci). Usually pathogenicity for humans is low. The tapeworm eggs contaminate the environment directly or through surface waters. Humancarriers should be treated promptly. Strict rules for the hygienic disposal or sanitation of human faeces with a method that inactivates T. saginataeggs should be developed. The spreading of human excrement on land should not be allowed.


Post-mortem, macroscopic examination of carcasses of adult cattle as well as calves is routinely done in all slaughterhouses. Serological examinationis possible and confirmation of the lesions by molecular tests can be done. Lightly contaminated carcasses are treated by freezing at -18C for 10days before declared fit for human consumption. Heavily contaminated carcasses are unfit for human consumption and are destroyed.


The introduction of serological analyzes for the detection of cysticerci antigens in the serum of animals (cattle) should be developed. This wouldallow the detection of more cases of infection than by live and infectious cysts by visual inspection of carcasses at slaughterhouse.

3.10 SARCOCYSTOSIS


3.10.1.1 Sarcocystis - general evaluation


At the slaughterhouses, a small number of carcasses showing myositis eosinophilica (green colouring spots of the carcass) are detected and notifiedto the Federal Agency for the Safety of the Food Chain. In case of positive findings, carcasses are totally rejected and declared unfit for humanconsumption. In 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014 and 2015 respectively 37, 44, 60, 75, 94 and 107 cases of sarcosporidiosis in cattle were reported.


Sarcocystis bovihominis (bovine as intermediate host) and Sarcocystis suihominis (porcine intermediate host) occur sporadically. Domesticcarnivores are hosts of the adult stage. Humans can be a definitive host for sarcosporidiosis by ingestion of infected meat or excreted oocysts anddevelop symptoms like diarrhea, headache, eosinophilia, abortion, congenital disorder. For human sarcosporidiosis there is no immunitydevelopment. A majority of grazing animals are inappearent carriers of tissue cysts.


Carcasses are entirely condemned when myositis eosinophilica lesions are apparent. Myositis eosinophilica is commonly associated withsarcosporidiosis but this has still to be proven!

29Belgium - 2015

3.11 TOXOPLASMA


3.11.1.1 Toxoplasma - general evaluation


The majority of grazing animals seem to be inappearent carriers of tissue cysts.


Humans are infected with Toxoplasma gondii through ingestion of undercooked infected meat or upon accidental ingestion of sporulated oocystsfrom the environment. The cat is the final host, man and most warm-blooded animals are intermediate hosts. Most infections with T.gondii areasymptomatic, however mild (flu-like symptoms), moderate (lymphadenopathy, chronic fatigue) to severe disease (disseminated toxoplasmosis,encephalitis) may occur, the latter mainly in immunocompromized hosts. Moreover, when infection occurs in pregnant women, toxoplasmosis maycause abortion and congenital disorders. If a woman acquires primary infection during pregnancy, Toxoplasma can be transmitted through theplacenta to the foetus and lead to congenital toxoplasmosis. A percentage of young children (1 to 14-year-old age group) may get post-natalinfections with T. gondii and develop symptomatic toxoplasmosis (e.g. ocular disease). A number of cases of the disease in a 15 to 24-year-old agegroup may be referred to as acquired toxoplasmosis in immunocompetent patients, which may present a wide range of clinical signs, fromlymphadenopathy to retinitis and uveitis. Immunocompetent individuals may often develop clinical toxoplasmosis. The majority of adult personshave acquired a degree of immunity to re-infection but can remain carrier.


Screening for toxoplasmosis during pregnancy is common in Belgium. The seroprevalence in women tested before pregnancy is about 50%.Prevention of congenital toxoplasmosis by specific hygienic measures seems to have limited impact.

3.12 VTEC

3.12.1 Escherichia coli in foodstuffs

3.12.1.1 Verotoxigenic E. coli (VTEC) in food

Monitoring system

Sampling strategy

The Federal Agency for the Safety of the Food Chain foresees sampling of carcasses (bovine) in slaughterhouses, and sampling of meatpreparations in cutting plants, meat manufacturing plants, retail and at import. Also carcesses from sheep were sampled at slaughterhouse.Also other products susceptible to STEC were analyses, e.g. raw milk cheeses.

30Belgium - 2015

4 ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE INFORMATION ON SPECIFIC ZOONOSES AND ZOONOTICAGENTS

4.1 SALMONELLOSIS

4.1.1 Salmonella in foodstuffs

4.1.1.1 Antimicrobial resistance in Salmonella Meat from pig

Sampling strategy used in monitoring


Strains of Salmonella enterica isolated during the zoonosis monitoring program (national and Efsa specific monitoring) were sent to theScientific Institute of Public Health for serotyping and determination of antimicrobial resistance. Different food matrices were sampled,mainly poultry (carcasses from broilers and spent hens, chicken parts and meat preparations) and pork (carcasses and cut meats). Othermatrices where Salmonella was isolated were ready-to-eat meals, meat, meat preparations, frogs legs, crustaceans and fruits. Since 2014,the AMR was performed on all serotypes.


Sampling distributed evenly throughout the year


pig and bovine carcasses

Procedures for the selection of isolates for antimicrobial testing

All strains isolated during the zoonosis monitoring program were sent to the Institute of Public Health for serotyping and determination ofantimicrobial resistance. Since 2014, AMR was performed on all serotypes identified.

Laboratory methodology used for identification of the microbial isolates

Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations (MIC) were determined by the broth dilution method using Sensititre, as described in the EU-legislation OfficialJournal of the European Union, Commission implementing decision of 12 november 2013 on the monitoring and reporting of antimicrobial resistancein zoonotic and commesal bacteria. Interpretation was according to the EU-legislation. Quality control was performed by using an Escherichia coliATCC 25922 strain.

Laboratory used for detection for resistance

Antimicrobials included in monitoring

The antimicrobials tested are listed in the following table. Ampicilline Cefotaxime Ceftazidime Meropene me Acide Nalidixique CiprofloxacineTetracycline Colistine Gentamicine Trimthoprime Sulfamthoxazole Chloramphnicol Azithromycine Tigecycline


31Belgium - 2015

Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations (MIC) were determined by the broth dilution method using Sensititre EUVSEC panel, as described in theEU-directive of 13 november 2013. The antimicrobials reported as well as the breakpoints for interpretation are listed in the table below.Quality control was performed by using an Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 strain. First panel EUVSECAntimicrobienne ECOFF (R> mg/l)Ampicilline 8 Cefotaxime 0.5 Ceftazidime 0.5 Meropeneme 0.125 Acide Nalidixique 16 Ciprofloxacine 0.064 Tetracycline 8 Colistine 2Gentamicine 2 Trimethoprime 2 Sulfamethoxazole 256 Chloramephnicol 16 Azithromycine 16Tigcycline 1 Second panelEUVSEC2Antimicrobien ECOFF* (R>mg/l) Cefoxitin 8 Cefpime 0.125 Cefotaxime+calvulanic acid >0.5ceftazidime+clavulanic acid>2Meropeneme 0.125 Temocilline 32Imipenem 0.5 Ertapeneme 0.06 Cefotaxtime 0.25 ceftazidime 0.5

Cut-off values used in testing

The cut-off values were used as described in the European Decision of 12 november 2013 on the monitoring and reporting of antimicrobialresistance in zoonotic and commensal bacteria.


Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations (MIC) were determined by the use of broth microdilution, frist panel Sensititre EUVSEC. Thedetermination of the Salmonella spp. to tirhd generation cephalosporins or meropenem has been done with the second panel, EUVSEC2Theantimicrobials of the first panel EUVSEC, tested and the breakpoints used are listed in the following table.Antimicrobienne ECOFF (R> mg/l)Ampicilline 8 Cfotaxime 0.5 Ceftazidime 0.5 Mropnme 0.125 Acide Nalidixique 16 Ciprofloxacine 0.064 Ttracycline 8 Colistine 2Gentamicine 2Trimthoprime 2 Sulfamthoxazole 256Chloramphnicol 16 Azithromycine 16 Tigcycline 1 The antimicrobials of the second panel EUVSEC2,tested and the breakpoints used are listed in the following table.Antimicrobien ECOFF* (R>mg/l) Cfoxitin 8 Cfpime 0.125Cefotaxime+calvulanic acid 0.5ceftazidime+clavulanic acid 2Mropnme 0.125 Temocilline 32Imipnm 0.5 Ertapnme 0.06 Cfotaxtime 0.25ceftazidime 0.5


In total 233 Salmonella strains recovery on 2015 from the food-program, were tested for their antimicrobial susceptibility (AST). This includesmainly isolates from poultry carcasses and poultry cut meats but also from other food matrices such as ovine and caprine carcasses, meatpreaprations, crustaceans, and frog legs. Since 2014, all the serovars are subjected to AST determination. The overall analysis of all the matricesand serovars together, have shown that the resistance to cefotaxime, ceftazidime and meropenem was 0% . For Azithromycin, Chloramphenicol andTigecycline the resistance was lower thant 2%. Resistance to ampicillin, quinolones, sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim were about 22-25%. Themost important serovars were analysed separately. Concerning the serovar S.enteritidis, all the isolates were recovered from poultry, mainly frompoultry carcassees. 70% of the isolaters were sensitibles to all the antimicrobials tested. Resistance to colistine was 23%, lower than the valueobtained in 2014 (42%). Analysis of the isolates belonged to the serovar Parathypi showed that all except one were isolated form poultry, mainlyfrom broiler carcasses. A dramatic high multiresistance has been noticed in 83% of the isolates being the AMR-profile AmpCipNalTmp the moreprevalent. No resistance to cephalosporins nor to carbapenems have been noticed. Isolates were stronlgy resistant to Trimpethoprim (96%)followed to Ciprofloxacin (72%) and nalidixic acid (72%). Analysis of the serovar Infantis, has shown that this serovar is stronlgy resistant toquinolones (and fluoroquinolones) being 90% of the isolates resistant to both. In the same way, 95% of the isolates were resistant tosulfamethoxazole.


For specific results in foodstuff derived from poultry and porc, see the corresponding sections.

4.1.1.2 Antimicrobial resistance in Salmonella Meat from poultry, unspecified





carcasses from pigs and bovines


All strains isolated during the zoonosis monitoring program, national monitoring and efsa especific monitoring, were sent to the Institute ofPublic Health for serotyping and determination of antimicrobial resistance.

32Belgium - 2015

Methods used for collecting data

Since 2014, antimicrobia susceptibility testing (AST) was performed in all the serotypes determined



Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations (MIC) were determined by the broth dilution method using Sensititre EUVSEC and EUVSEC2 panels, asdescribed in the EU-directive of 13 november 2013. The antimicrobials reported as well as the breaskpoints for interpretation are listed inthe tables below. Quality control was performed by using an Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 strain. First panel EUVSECAntimicrobienneAmpicilline Cfotaxime Ceftazidime Meropeneme Acide Nalidixique Ciprofloxacine Tetracycline Colistine Gentamicine TrimthoprimeSulfamthoxazole Chloramphenicol Azithromycine Tigecycline Second panel EUVSEC2Antimicrobien Cfoxitin Cfpime Cefotaxime+calvulanicacid ceftazidime+clavulanic acid Meropeneme Temocilline Imipenem Ertapeneme Cefotaxtime ceftazidime


Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations (MIC) were determined by the broth dilution method using Sensititre EUVSEC panel, as described in theEU-directive of 13 november 2013. The antimicrobials reported as well as the breakpoints for interpretation are listed in the table below.Quality control was performed by using an Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 strain. First panel EUVSECAntimicrobienne ECOFF (R> mg/l)Ampicilline 8 Cfotaxime 0.5 Ceftazidime 0.5 Mropnme 0.125 Acide Nalidixique 16 Ciprofloxacine 0.064 Ttracycline 8 Colistine 2 Gentamicine2 Trimthoprime 2 Sulfamthoxazole 256 Chloramphnicol 16 Azithromycine 16Tigcycline 1 Second panel EUVSEC2Antimicrobien ECOFF*(R>mg/l) Cfoxitin 8 Cfpime 0.125 Cefotaxime+calvulanic acid >0.5ceftazidime+clavulanic acid >2Mropnme 0.125 Temocilline 32Imipnm0.5 Ertapeneme 0.06 Cfotaxtime 0.25 ceftazidime 0.5


Antimicrobial resistance in strains isolated from pig and bovine carcasses (EFSA-specific monitoring). During 2015, 188 Salmonella spp. isolates,from pig and bovine carcasse (EFSA specification) were performed for their antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST). Among them, 95 wereobtained from the national surveillance plan and 93 were obtianed from the food business operators. The most predomiannt serotype was theDerby (36.17%) followed by the Monophasic Typhimurium (17%) and the Typhimurium var O:5- (15%). The highest resistance reported was tosulfamethoxazole (58%), followed by Ampicillin (41.5%) and Tetracycline (34%). For Azithromicin, cefotaxime, ceftazidime and colistin, valueswere lower than 2%, for tigeciclyne, ciprofloxacine and nalidiixic acid values ranged from 2-4%, and for choramphenicol, the resistance was around6%. No resistance to meropenem was detected. Among the 188, isolates, one was confirmed to be ESBL producers. It belong to the serovarautoagglutinable and was isolated from pig carcasses.

4.1.2 Salmonella in animals

4.1.2.1 Antimicrobial resistance in Salmonella Cattle (bovine animals)



Clinical investigations, laboratory findings of the NRL Salmonella, animal health.

4.1.2.2 Antimicrobial resistance in Salmonella Poultry, unspecified

Description of sampling designs

Only Salmonella isolates obtained in the framework of the National Salmonella Control Programmes in broilers, meat turkeys and layers are used forthe evaluation of the antimicrobial resistance in Salmonella in poultry.

33Belgium - 2015



The sampling strategy in poultry is explained in the different chapters on Salmonella in layers, broilers and meat turkeys.


All Salmonella isolates obtained in the framework of the National Salmonella Control Programmes in layers and meat turkeys are selectedfor antimicrobial testing. In broilers, the first 170 isolates obtained are tested.

Methods used for collecting data

In the framework of the National Salmonella Control Programme, all laboratories involved in the detection of Salmonella gather therequested information concerning the sample and the sampled flock. All information is reported monthly to the Federal Agency for theSafety of the Food Chain together with the result of the analyses. All Salmonella isolates are send to the NRL (CODA-CERVA) for serotyping.A fixed motive that indicates if AMR tests are required must accompany the isolate.


The laboratory methods laid down in decision 2013/652/EU are used. Salmonella spp. was isolated at several laboraties (DGZ, ARSIA, laboratoriesof the Federal Food Agency, Lavetan, ) using the ISO 6579:2002/Amd1:2007 Annex D method (ISO, 2007). Serotyping was performed by CODA-CERVA (Veterinary and Agrochemical Research center, the National Reference Laboratory for antimicrobial resistance), according to the Kauffman-White-Le Minor scheme .



All isolates from poultry are tested in the NRL (CODA/CERVA). Antimicrobial susceptibility of the Salmonella spp. strains was tested using amicro broth dilution method (Trek Diagnostics). To this end, 1 to 3 colonies were suspended in sterile physiological water to an opticaldensity of 0.5 McFarland. Ten microliter of this suspension is inoculated in 11 ml cation adjusted Mueller Hinton broth with TES buffer. Fiftymicroliter of the Mueller-Hinton broth with bacteria was brought on a micro-titer plate with the antimicrobials lyophilised, produced by TrekDiagnostics, using the auto-inoculating system of Trek Diagnostics. The antimicrobial substances incorporated in the antimicrobialsusceptibility testing were recommended by the European Food Safety Agency (EFSA) and included in the decision 2013/652/EU of theCommission.


The cut-off values described in decision 2013/652/EU are used. Epidemiological cut-offs (ECOFFs), established by the European Committeeon Antimicrobial Susceptibility (EUCAST) or as defined by the EU reference laboratory on antimicrobial resistance (DTU) were used.


Resistance to ciprofloxacin and nalidixic acid, both quinolones, is highly present in Salmonella spp. isolated from broiler chickens (26.9% and 26.1%respectively). Colistin resistance in broiler chickens an dlaying hens was predominantly represented by S. Enteritidis.


34Belgium - 2015

In broilers, 134 isolates were tested on their antimicrobial resistance. Highest levels of resistance were reported for sulfamethoxazole (36%),ciprofloxacin (27%) and nalidixic acid (26%). Moderate resistance levels were seen for ampicillin (19%), trimethoprim (16%), tetracycline (14%)and colistin (11%). Antimicrobial resistance to chloramphenicol (5%), tigecycline (3%), gentamicin (2%), azithromycin (1%), cefotaxime (1%)andceftazidime (1%) was low, whereas resistance to meropenem remained undetected. 47.0% of Salmonella spp. were fully susceptible and 20.9%showed multi-resistance (resistance to at least three different antimicrobial classes). Resistance to 2 antibiotics was most frequently observed(19.4%), followed by multi-resistance to 4 antimicrobial classes. S. Infantis, most frequent isolated in broiler chickens, showed full susceptibility in 4out of the 27 strains, but resistance to 2 different antimicrobial classes occurred most frequently (15 out of 27 strains). Multi-resistance to 3, 4, 5 or6 different classes was seen in 8 out of the 17 S. Infantis strains (Figures 4 and 5). Resistance to ciprofloxacin, nalidixic acid or to sulfamethoxazolewas present in 23 out of 27 S. Infantis strains. Moreover, combined resistance to these antibiotics was a frequently recurring phenotypic resistancepattern (55.6% of the S. Infantis strains). In laying hens, 55isolates were tested on their antimicrobial resistance. Highest levels of resistance werereported for colistin (40%)and low levels for ciprofloxacin (2%) and nalidixic acid (2%). Antimicrobial resistance to ampicillin, azithromycin,chloramphenicol, cefotaxime, gentamicin, meropenem, sulfamethoxazole, ceftazidime, tetracycline, tigecycline and trimethoprim remainedundetected (0%). 58.2% of Salmonella spp. were fully susceptible and none of the isolates showed multi-resistance. Resistance to 1 antibiotic wasmost frequently observed (40.0%) and resistance to 2 different antimicrobial classes occurred in only 1 Salmonella spp. strains (1.8%), representedby S. Enteritidis. Antimicrobial resistance in Salmonella spp. from laying hens was almost found exclusively in S. Enteritidis, and more particularly tocolistin, as 75.0% of the strains was found resistant . One colistin resistant strain showed also resistance to nalidixic acid. Resistance to colistin wasalso found in 1 S. Typhimurium strain. One other strain (Serum OMD) showed resistance to ciprofloxacin. Only one Salmonella serovar Typhimuriumwas isolated from turkeys. The strain was found resistant to ampicillin, sulfamethoxazole and tetracycline.


There are no measures related to the finding of antimicrobial resistance in Salmonella in poultry.



There are no mandatory control strategies in place.

4.2 CAMPYLOBACTERIOSIS

4.2.1 Campylobacter in foodstuffs

4.2.1.1 Antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter Meat from pig



All strains isolated in the zoonosis monitoring program and originating from pork were sent to the Institute of Public Health fordetermination of antimicrobial resistance.


Specification (coli/jejuni) with PCR (Debruyn et al, Res Microbiol, 2008)



35Belgium - 2015

Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations (MIC) were determined by using broth microdilution method (Sensititre EUCAMP2 panel). From 2014, anew European decision on the harmonization of the monitoring and reporting of antimicrobial resistance in zoonotic and commensalbacteria is adopted which specifies new interpretative threshold for resistance for C jejuni and C. coli. Therefore, the antimicrobials testedand the epidemiological cut-off values (ECOFF) used are listed in the table below following the official Journal of the European Union(L303/26 14.11.2013). In order to compared results in an accurate way, recalculation of resistance to the antibiotics using the newbreakpoint established in the European decision was done for the last four years, from 2010 to 2013 included.AntimicrobialBreakpoints R >(g / ml) C. jejuniC. coliTetracycline12Nalidixicacid1616Ciprofloxacin0.50.5Erythromycin48Gentamicin22Streptomycin44Campylobacter in meat and meat products: list of antimicrobialstested and breakpoints used.

4.2.1.2 Antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter Meat from poultry, unspecified



In 2015, 386 Campylobacter strains isolated in the zoonoses monitoring programme and originating from poultry, (carcasses of broilers,filets, entrails, meat preparation and carcasses of spent hens) were subjected to antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST)


Specification (coli/jejuni) with PCR (Denis et al, 2001)



Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations (MIC) were determined by using broth microdilution method (Sensititre EUCAMP2 panel). From 2014, anew European decision on the harmonization of the monitoring and reporting of antimicrobial resistance in zoonotic and commensalbacteria is adopted which specifies new interpretative threshold for resistance for C jejuni and C. coli. Therefore, the antimicrobials testedand the epidemiological cut-off values (ECOFF) used are listed in the table below following the official Journal of the European Union(L303/26 14.11.2013). Campylobacter in meat and meat products: list of antimicrobials tested and breakpoints used.AntimicrobialBreakpoints R > (g / ml) C. jejuni/C. coli Tetracycline1/2 Nalidixic acid16/16 Ciprofloxacin0.5/0.5 Erythromycin4/8Gentamicin2/2 Streptomycin4/4


In 2015, 386 Campylobacter jejuni strains isolated from poultry meat and carcasses were tested for antimicrobial susceptibility. Overall, resistanceto quinolones was present in 61% of the strains and also tetracycline resistance was quite high 55%. For Erythromycine, gentamicin andstreptomycin, resistance was between 0-2%. For C. jejuni, 30% of all strains were sensitive to all antibiotics tested, which is similar to last year(25%). The resistance against tetracycline and quinolones remained high, and increased again to respectively 55% and 61%. Resistance tostreptomycin, erythromycin and gentamycin remains low ( 2%). The trends in antimicrobial resistance for streptomycin, erythromycin andgentamycin are stable since 2010, however, resistance to ciprofloxacin, nalidixic acid and tetracycline continues to increase sligtly. Among them,45% of the isolates showed a phenotype du type CipNalTet, and 2% (n=7) were multidrug resistante with a phenotype du type CipEryGenNalStrTet(n=2), CipNalTetStr (n=4), CipEryStrTet (n=1).

4.3 ESCHERICHIA COLI, NON-PATHOGENIC

4.3.1 Escherichia coli, non-pathogenic in foodstuffs

4.3.1.1 Antimicrobial resistance in E.coli, non-pathogenic, unspecified Meat from pig

36Belgium - 2015




4.3.2 Escherichia coli, non-pathogenic in animals

4.3.2.1 Antimicrobial resistance in E.coli, non-pathogenic, unspecified

Description of sampling designs

Each year, the AMR of commensal E. Coli is monitored in poultry, pigs and bovines. The number of samples taken is calculated based on thedetection percentage of commensal E. Coli. The samples of poultry, pigs and meat calves are taken at the slaughterhouse. The samples of youngbovines at the farm.

37Belgium - 2015

5 INFORMATION ON SPECIFIC MICROBIOLOGICAL AGENTS

5.1 CRONOBACTER

5.1.1 Cronobacter in foodstuffs

5.1.1.1 Cronobacter in food

Monitoring system

Sampling strategy

Tests for Cronobacter sakazakii were performed in foodstuff intended for special nutritional uses, infant formula. Samples are taken at retaillevel and at manufactering levenl. Also repared powderd milk in bottles for infants and young children is being sampled in hospitals(nursery for infants).


Samples are taken according to the national control program or in the frame of RASFF, complaints or suspicion.


Foodstuff intended for special nutritional uses (infants), infant formula and prepared powdered milk in bottles for infants.


Samples are taken according to a sampling scheme of is n=1.


To determine the conformity of a sample or a batch, the criteria laid down in the Regulation (EC) No 2073/2005 are applied.


ISO/TS 22964:2006 (IDF/RM 210: 2006) CRONOBACTERSPP. (ENTEROBACTER SAKAZAKII)


Measures to be taken in the case of a non-compliant result:- Notification of the producer or importer- Possibility of a counter analysis- Destructionof the non compliant batch - Further investigation: additional sampling, possible recall, RASFF, ...

5.2 HISTAMINE

5.2.1 Histamine in foodstuffs

38Belgium - 2015

5.2.1.1 Histamine in food



The annual control plan forsees controls of histamine in fishery products with high levels of histidine.

5.3 STAPHYLOCOCCAL ENTEROTOXINS

5.3.1 Staphylococcal enterotoxins in foodstuffs

5.3.1.1 Staphylococcal enterotoxins in food

Monitoring system

Sampling strategy

Tests of Staphylococcal enterotoxins were performed in samples with more than 10(5) cfu/g of Staphylococcus present.


Samples are taken according to the national control program or in the frame of RASFF, complaints or suspicion.


cheeses, RTE, ...


Samples are taken according to a sampling scheme of n=1.


To determine the conformity of a sample or a batch, the criteria laid down in the Regulation (EC)No 2073/2005 are applied. For products forwhich no legal criteeria exist, a table of action limits is made avialable for the inspectors. (cfr. rt. 14, Reg 178/2002)

39Belgium - 2015

6 FOODBORNE OUTBREAKS

Foodborne outbreaks are incidences of two or more human cases of the same disease or infection where the cases arelinked or are probably linked to the same food source. Situation, in which the observed human cases exceed the expectednumber of cases and where a same food source is suspected, is also indicative of a foodborne outbreak.

6.1 Outbreaks

6.1.1 Foodborne outbreaks

System in place for identification, epidemological investigations and reporting of foodborne outbreaks

In Belgium different authorities are dealing with food-borne outbreaks:-The Federal Agency for the Safety of the Food chain FASFC deals with safetyof foodstuffs, epidemiological investigation on foodstuffs and animal health issues in case of a food-borne outbreak. -The Communities (Flemish,French and German speaking Community) are dealing with person related matters as human health and can start an epidemiological investigationby Public health medical inspectors in case of a food-borne outbreak. -The Scientific Institute of Public Health WIV-ISP (National ReferenceLaboratory on Food-borne Outbreaks) analyses all suspected food samples, collects all data on food-borne outbreaks and gives scientific support tothe FASFC officers and the Public Health Inspectors. A national "Platform Food-borne outbreaks", approved by the National Conference of Ministersof Public Health, brings together the different competent authorities on food safety, animal health and public health. Furthermore in 2007, for abetter communication, a protected web application was made available to exchange outbreak data and laboratory results in real time between thedifferent authorities dealing with FBO. In this web-application a common file is created for each individual outbreak, and the data and laboratoryresults are shared between food inspectors and human health inspectors. Data in this report come from the Federal Agency for the Safety of theFood Chain, the Public Health Inspection, the sentinel laboratories network for human microbiology, and the Federal Reference Centres for Food-borne outbreaks, for Clostridium botulinum, for Salmonella and Shigella and for Listeria.

Description of the types of outbreaks covered by the reporting:

A food-borne outbreak is defined as an incidence, observed under given circumstances, of two or more human cases of the same disease and/orinfection, or a situation in which the observed number of human cases exceeds the expected number and where the cases are linked, or areprobably linked, to the same food source (Directive 2003/99/EC, Article 2(d)). Data are collected from FASFC, the Flemish Community, the Frenchcommunity, the Brussels Common Community Committee, the sentinel laboratories network for human clinical microbiology, the National ReferenceLaboratory for Food-borne outbreaks, and the National Reference Centres for Salmonella and Shigella, Listeria and C. botulinum. The reportingincludes both general and household outbreaks. The causative agents covered are Salmonella spp., Shigella spp., Campylobacter spp.,Verotoxigenic E.coli, Listeria monocytogenes, Clostridium botulinum, Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus cereus, Clostridium perfringens, Giardia,Norovirus, enterotoxins of Staphylococcus aureus and Bacillus cereus and histamine.

National evaluation of the reported outbreaks in the country:

Trends in numbers of outbreaks and numbers of human cases involved

During 2015, a total of 351 outbreaks of food-borne infections and intoxications and two cases of human botulism were recorded inBelgium. More than 1673 people were ill, and at least 40 persons were hospitalized. None of the human cases died. The number of reportedoutbreaks increased in 2011 as compared to former years but remains stable since then. The increase was probably due to an adaptedOutbreak investigation procedure at the FASFC since 2011 and/or increased sensibility by consumers. The number of human cases involvedare similar as in previous years which is also the case for the number of people hospitalized due to a collective food borne outbreak.

Relevance of the different causative agents, food categories and the agent/food category combinations

40Belgium - 2015

In 2015, in total 13 verified food borne outbreaks were reported and two individual cases of human botulism. In these outbreaks thecausative agent was found in the implicated food and/or it was clear by analytical or strong descriptive epidemiology that food was at theorigin of disease. All other outbreaks were classified as weak evidence outbreaks were the agent was unknown or the agent could only bedetected at human level. Bacterial toxins of Bacillus cereus was the most frequently detected causative agent in 4 outbreaks and wasresponsible for 83 human cases. Two outbreaks were caused by emetic toxin producing Bacillus cereus whereas enterotoxigenic Bacilluscereus was identified as causative agent for the remaining 2 outbreaks. The second most reported agents were Salmonella and Coagulasepositive Staphylococcus (CPS) with each being at the origin of 4 outbreaks. In total 68 persons became ill and at least 1 was hospitalizeddue to Salmonella. Salmonella Enteritidis (MLVA type 3-9-5-4-1) was at the origin of 1 outbreak involving contaminated bovine meat andproducts thereof. Salmonella Stanley was isolated from 49 patients. No information on number of hospitalizations was reported. The PFGEprofile (XbaI.0261) of the human isolates was identical to 2 strains isolated during the same period from Turkey meat and to the strainisolated during the Salmonella Stanley outbreak that occurred in Europe in 2011-2012. Two other Salmonella outbreaks of weak evidenceinvolved 11 persons. Coagulase positive Staphylococcus (CPS) was involved in 4 outbreaks, and 112 persons became ill, 1 of which washospitalized. Enterotoxin producing CPS were isolated from composed meals (crustacea or fish), chocolate milk or cooked vegetablescontaining white beans. Norovirus was at the origin of 2 outbreaks and was responsible for 29 human cases. In these outbreaks, Noroviruswas probably transmitted by the food as shown by descriptive epidemiology. Histamine was responsible for 1 outbreaks causing 2 ill peoplethat both were hospitalized. Consumption of tuna fish could be linked to the outbreak. E. coli O157:H7 was at the origin of 2 outbreaksinvolving 8 human cases but a food source remains unknown. Campylobacter was linked to 2 outbreaks and caused diarrhea in 10 humancases. Consumption of raw milk or chicken meat was probably at the origin of these outbreaks. Two weak evidence outbreaks wereprobably caused by Shigella sonnei and one by Yersinia enterocolitica, but the involved food source could not be identified. In 93.4% of theoutbreaks (N=328 out of 351) no causative agent could be identified. An important reason for this is the absence of leftovers of thesuspected meal in most of those outbreaks and late reporting by the consumer. Only in 29.3% (N=103 out of 351) of the outbreaks,samples (human and/or food) were send for analysis among which 22.3% (N=23) resulted in the detection of a pathogen. Some of thelatter outbreaks (N=10) have been categorized as a weak evidence outbreak. Most food-borne outbreaks (50.1%) were due to theconsumption of meals composed of different ingredients. Meat and meat based products (bovine, pig, sheep, broiler) were responsible for19.1 % of the outbreaks. In 11.7% of the outbreaks the implicated food was unknown.

Relevance of the different type of places of food production and preparation in outbreaks

Restaurants and take away or fast food outlets were the most important location of exposure, being the setting of 52.1 % and 24.5 %,respectively, of food-borne outbreaks in Belgium in 2015. Catering at work, institutional catering or temporary mass catering are reported inrespectively 0.9 %, 0.9 and 1.7 % of the food-borne outbreaks. 13.7 % of the outbreaks happened at home.

Descriptions of single outbreaks of special interest

In 2015, 75 participants of a wedding suffered from violent vomiting, diarrhea and abdominal pain within 3 hours after the buffet meal. Thebuffet meal included goat meat, fish, meat balls and other foods, and was prepared by some family members of the bride and groom. Itwas reported that food was conserved at inadequate temperatures between its preparation and consumption. Enterotoxin D producingcoagulase positive Staphylococci were isolated from three different dishes served at the wedding. In 2015, a total of 59 human cases ofSalmonella Stanley have been reported, of which 49 were isolated between week 35 and 53 and thus considered as an outbreak. No dataon number the of hospitalizations was reported. The PFGE profile (XbaI.0261) of the human isolates was identical to 2 strains isolatedduring the same period from turkey meat. Interestingly, the profile is identical to that of the Salmonella Stanley outbreak that occurred inEurope in 2011-2012. Two individual cases of human botulism type B were confirmed. The patients suffered from nerval symptoms, drymouth and troubled view. Consumption of artisanal made ham was at the origin of disease.

Control measures or other actions taken to improve the situation

Logistic slaughtering is applied for poultry which means that poultry with a Salmonella-free certificate are slaughtered before other poultry.The vaccination of laying hens against salmonellosis, started in 2003 and is mandatory for Salmonella enteritidis and is stronglyrecommended for Salmonella typhimurium.

41Belgium - 2015

ANIMAL POPULATION TABLES

Animal species Category of animals

Metrics

Unit

Population

holding animalslaughter animal

(heads)Cattle (bovine animals)

Deer

DucksGallus gallus (fowl)

GeeseGoatsGuinea fowlPartridgesPheasantsPigeonsPigs

QuailsRabbitsRatites (ostrich, emu, nandu)SheepSolipeds, domesticTurkeysWild boars

Cattle (bovine animals)Cattle (bovine animals) - calves (under 1 year) - veal calvesDeerDeer - farmed - fallow deerDeer - wild - fallow deerDeer - wild - red deerDucksGallus gallus (fowl)Gallus gallus (fowl) - breeding flocks, unspecifiedGallus gallus (fowl) - broilersGallus gallus (fowl) - laying hensGeeseGoatsGuinea fowlPartridgesPheasantsPigeonsPigsPigs - breeding animalsPigs - fattening pigsQuailsRabbitsRatites (ostrich, emu, nandu) - farmedSheepSolipeds, domesticTurkeysWild boars - wild

29,315 2,640,941 519,403355,545

2,428 10,1301,0922,382

11,61844,124

1,527 307,539,0653,021,085

32,395,330 278,535,8619,480,856 27,996,880

79510,211 61,654 11,711

12,5949,770

11,993117,196

7,754 11,918,904551,362

5,314,450125

3,010,412247

26,865 201,362 128,262288,222 8,540

809,4806,546

Table Susceptible animal population

42Belgium - 2015

DISEASE STATUS TABLES

Table Bovine brucellosis in countries and regions that do not receive Community co-financing for eradication programme

Region

Metrics

Number ofanimals

serologically testedunder

investigations of

suspectcases

Number ofsuspendedherds underinvestigatio

ns ofsuspectcases

Number ofseropositive animals

underinvestigatio

ns ofsuspectcases

Number ofanimals

positive toBST underinvestigatio

ns ofsuspectcases

Number ofanimals

positive inmicrobiological testing

underinvestigatio

ns ofsuspectcases

Number ofherds with

statusofficially

free

Number ofinfectedherds

Totalnumber of

animals

Number ofherdstestedunder

surveillance

Number ofanimalstestedunder

surveillance

Totalnumber of

herds

Number ofherdstestedunder

surveillanceby bulk milk

Number ofanimals or

poolstestedunder


Number ofinfectedherdstestedunder


Number ofnotified

abortionswhatever

cause

Number ofisolationsof Brucellainfections

Number ofabortions

due toBrucellaabortus

Number ofanimals

tested bymicrobiolog

y underinvestigatio

ns ofsuspectcases

BELGIUM 107 12 16 0 0 29,315 0 2,640,941 12,498 44,560 29,315 7,969 16,908 0 11,884 0 0 7

43Belgium - 2015

Table Ovine or Caprine brucellosis in countries and regions that do not receive Community co-financing for eradication programme

Region

Metrics

Number ofanimals

serologically testedunder

investigations of

suspectcases

Number ofsuspendedherds underinvestigatio

ns ofsuspectcases

Number ofseropositive animals

underinvestigatio

ns ofsuspectcases

Number ofanimals

positive inmicrobiological testing

underinvestigatio

ns ofsuspectcases

Number ofherds with

statusofficially

free

Number ofinfectedherds

Totalnumber of

animals

Number ofanimalstestedunder

surveillance

Totalnumber of

herds

Number ofanimals

tested bymicrobiolog

y underinvestigatio

ns ofsuspectcases

BELGIUM 290 0 1 0 37,076 0 263,016 7,146 37,076 4

44Belgium - 2015

DISEASE STATUS TABLES

Table Bovine tuberculosis in countries and regions that do not receive Community co-financing for eradication programme

Region

Metrics

Number of herds withstatus officially free

Number of infectedherds

Total number ofanimals

Interval betweenroutine tuberculin tests

Number of animalstested with tuberculin

routine testing

Number of tuberculintests carried out before

the introduction intothe herds

Number of animals withsuspicious lesions of

tuberculosis examinedand submitted to

histopathological andbacteriologicalexaminations

Number of animalsdetected positive in

bacteriologicalexamination Total number of herds

BELGIUM 29,312 3 2,640,941 0 189,593 303,377 438 10 29,315

45Belgium - 2015

PREVALENCE TABLES

Table CAMPYLOBACTER in food

Area of Sampling Matrix - Sampling stage - Sampling origin - Sample type - Sampling context - Sampler - Sampling strategySamplingunit

Sampleweight

Sampleweight unit

Totalunitstested

Totalunitspositive Zoonoses

Metrics N of unitspositive

Not Available Cheeses made from cows' milk - fresh - made from raw or low heat-treated milk - Farm - NotAvailable - Not Available - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Cheeses made from cows' milk - soft and semi-soft - made from raw or low heat-treated milk -Farm - Not Available - Not Available - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Cheeses made from cows' milk - soft and semi-soft - made from raw or low heat-treated milk -Processing plant - Not Available - Not Available - Surveillance - Official sampling - ObjectivesamplingCheeses made from cows' milk - soft and semi-soft - made from raw or low heat-treated milk -Retail - Not Available - Not Available - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Live bivalve molluscs - Retail - Not Available - Not Available - Surveillance - Official sampling -Objective sampling

Meat from bovine animals - meat preparation - intended to be eaten cooked - Processing plant - NotAvailable - Not Available - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Meat from bovine animals - meat preparation - intended to be eaten cooked - Retail - Not Available- Not Available - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Meat from bovine animals - minced meat - intended to be eaten cooked - Retail - Not Available - NotAvailable - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Meat from bovine animals - minced meat - intended to be eaten raw - Retail - Not Available - NotAvailable - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Meat from bovine animals - minced meat - Processing plant - Not Available - Not Available -Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Meat from bovine animals and pig - meat preparation - intended to be eaten cooked - Processingplant - Not Available - Not Available - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Meat from bovine animals and pig - meat preparation - intended to be eaten cooked - Retail - NotAvailable - Not Available - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Meat from bovine animals and pig - minced meat - intended to be eaten cooked - Retail - NotAvailable - Not Available - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Meat from bovine animals and pig - minced meat - intended to be eaten raw - Retail - Not Available- Not Available - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Meat from bovine animals and pig - minced meat - Processing plant - Not Available - Not Available -Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - carcase - Slaughterhouse - Not Available - Not Available -Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)

single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

23

33

75

65

40

18

9

16

32

54

7

7

7

3

44

548

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

116

thermotolerant Campylobacter,unspecified
















0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

116

46Belgium - 2015


Sampleweight

Sampleweight unit

Totalunitstested



Not Available Meat from other poultry species - carcase - Slaughterhouse - Not Available - Not Available -Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Meat from pig - carcase - Slaughterhouse - Not Available - Not Available - Surveillance - Officialsampling - Objective sampling

Meat from pig - meat preparation - intended to be eaten cooked - Processing plant - Not Available -Not Available - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Meat from pig - meat preparation - intended to be eaten cooked - Retail - Not Available - NotAvailable - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Meat from pig - minced meat - intended to be eaten cooked - Retail - Not Available - Not Available -Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Meat from pig - minced meat - intended to be eaten raw - Retail - Not Available - Not Available -Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Meat from pig - minced meat - Processing plant - Not Available - Not Available - Surveillance -Official sampling - Objective sampling

Meat from poultry, unspecified - carcase - Retail - Not Available - Not Available - Surveillance -Official sampling - Objective sampling

Meat from poultry, unspecified - fresh - skinned - Cutting plant - Not Available - Not Available -Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Meat from poultry, unspecified - fresh - skinned - Retail - Not Available - Not Available - Surveillance- Official sampling - Objective sampling

Meat from poultry, unspecified - fresh - with skin - Cutting plant - Not Available - Not Available -Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Meat from poultry, unspecified - fresh - with skin - Retail - Not Available - Not Available -Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Meat from poultry, unspecified - meat preparation - intended to be eaten cooked - Processing plant- Not Available - Not Available - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Meat from poultry, unspecified - meat preparation - intended to be eaten cooked - Retail - NotAvailable - Not Available - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Milk, cows' - raw milk - Farm - Not Available - Not Available - Surveillance - Official sampling -Objective sampling

single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)

1

600

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

Gram

Colonyformingunit/gramGram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Millilitre

355

550

20

30

21

10

69

90

280

46

390

56

69

76

17

21

46

0

0

0

0

0

8

15

1

27

1

0

0

0
















21

46

0

0

0

0

0

8

15

1

27

1

0

0

0

47Belgium - 2015

Table COXIELLA in animal


Totalunitstested

Totalunitspositive

N of clinicalaffectedherds Zoonoses


Not Available Cattle (bovine animals) - Farm - Not Available - animal sample - blood - Clinical investigations - Industry sampling -Selective samplingCattle (bovine animals) - Farm - Not Available - animal sample - blood - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - SelectivesamplingCattle (bovine animals) - Farm - Not Available - animal sample - foetus/stillbirth - Monitoring - active - Official sampling -Selective samplingCattle (bovine animals) - Farm - Not Available - animal sample - milk - Clinical investigations - Industry sampling -Selective samplingCattle (bovine animals) - Farm - Not Available - animal sample - milk - Clinical investigations - Industry sampling -Selective samplingCattle (bovine animals) - Farm - Not Available - animal sample - milk - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - SelectivesamplingGoats - Farm - Not Available - animal sample - blood - Clinical investigations - Industry sampling - Selective samplingGoats - Farm - Not Available - animal sample - blood - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - Selective samplingGoats - Farm - Not Available - animal sample - foetus/stillbirth - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - Selective samplingGoats - milk goats - Farm - Not Available - animal sample - milk - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - Census

Sheep - Farm - Not Available - animal sample - blood - Clinical investigations - Industry sampling - Selective samplingSheep - Farm - Not Available - animal sample - blood - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - Selective samplingSheep - Farm - Not Available - animal sample - foetus/stillbirth - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - Selective samplingSheep - milk ewes - Farm - Not Available - animal sample - milk - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - Census

animal

animal

animal

herd/flockherd/flockherd/flockanimalanimalanimalherd/flockanimalanimalanimalherd/flock

1183

4657

8010

41

61

224

25614114

272711621

183

662

171

17

47

177

31010

4200

0

0

0

10

0

Coxiella burnetii

Coxiella burnetii

Coxiella burnetii

Coxiella burnetii

Coxiella burnetii

Coxiella burnetii

Coxiella burnetiiCoxiella burnetiiCoxiella burnetiiCoxiella burnetii

Coxiella burnetiiCoxiella burnetiiCoxiella burnetiiCoxiella burnetii

183

662

171

17

47

177

310

10

420

0

48Belgium - 2015

Table CRONOBACTER in food


Sampleweight

Sampleweight unit

Totalunitstested



Not Available Foodstuffs intended for special nutritional uses - dried dietary foods for special medical purposesintended for infants below 6 months - Retail - Not Available - Not Available - Surveillance - Officialsampling - Objective samplingInfant formula - dried - Processing plant - Not Available - Not Available - Surveillance - Officialsampling - Objective sampling

Infant formula - dried - Retail - Not Available - Not Available - Surveillance - Official sampling -Objective sampling

Infant formula - ready-to-eat - Hospital or medical care facility - Not Available - Not Available -Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

single(food/feed)


10

10

10

10

Gram

Gram

Gram

Millilitre

292

15

297

110

0

0

1

0

Cronobacter sakazakii




0

0

1

0

49Belgium - 2015

Table CYSTICERCUS in animal


Totalunitstested



Not Available Cattle (bovine animals) - Slaughterhouse - Not Available - Not Available - Surveillance - Official sampling - Suspect sampling animal 874948

1253 Cysticercus of Taenia saginata 1,253

50Belgium - 2015

Table ECHINOCOCCUS in animal


Totalunitstested




0 Echinococcus granulosuscomplex

0

51Belgium - 2015

Table ESCHERICHIA COLI in food


Sampleweight

Sampleweight unit

Totalunitstested



Not Available Cheeses made from cows' milk - fresh - made from raw or low heat-treated milk - Farm - NotAvailable - food sample - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Cheeses made from cows' milk - soft and semi-soft - made from raw or low heat-treated milk -Farm - Not Available - food sample - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Cheeses made from cows' milk - soft and semi-soft - made from raw or low heat-treated milk -Processing plant - Not Available - food sample - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Cheeses made from cows' milk - soft and semi-soft - made from raw or low heat-treated milk -Retail - Not Available - food sample - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Cheeses made from goats' milk - unspecified - made from raw or low heat-treated milk - Farm - NotAvailable - food sample - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Cheeses made from goats' milk - unspecified - made from raw or low heat-treated milk - Processingplant - Not Available - food sample - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Cheeses made from goats' milk - unspecified - made from raw or low heat-treated milk - Retail -Not Available - food sample - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Cheeses made from sheep's milk - unspecified - made from raw or low heat-treated milk - Farm -Not Available - food sample - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Cheeses made from sheep's milk - unspecified - made from raw or low heat-treated milk -Processing plant - Not Available - food sample - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Cheeses made from sheep's milk - unspecified - made from raw or low heat-treated milk - Retail -Not Available - food sample - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Dairy products (excluding cheeses) - butter - made from raw or low heat-treated milk - Farm - NotAvailable - food sample - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Dairy products (excluding cheeses) - butter - made from raw or low heat-treated milk - Processingplant - Not Available - food sample - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Fruits and vegetables - pre-cut - ready-to-eat - Border inspection activities - Not Available - foodsample - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Fruits and vegetables - pre-cut - ready-to-eat - Processing plant - Not Available - food sample -Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Fruits and vegetables - pre-cut - ready-to-eat - Retail - Not Available - food sample - Surveillance -Official sampling - Objective sampling

Meat from bovine animals - carcase - Slaughterhouse - Not Available - food sample - carcase swabs- Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Meat from bovine animals - Cutting plant - Not Available - food sample - Surveillance - Officialsampling - Objective sampling

single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)

single(food/feed)

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

1600

25

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Squarecentimetre

Gram

23

75

90

286

32

31

53

3

2

53

34

4

10

98

99

457

294

0

0

3

0

1

0

0

0

0

3

1

0

0

0

0

7

3

Verocytotoxigenic E. coli(VTEC)


VTEC, unspecified


VTEC O103





VTEC O26

VTEC, unspecified

VTEC, unspecified





VTEC O103VTEC O26VTEC, unspecifiedVTEC, unspecified

0

0

3

0

1

0

0

0

0

1

2

1

0

0

0

0

1243

52Belgium - 2015


Sampleweight

Sampleweight unit

Totalunitstested



Not Available Meat from bovine animals - minced meat - intended to be eaten raw - Retail - Not Available - foodsample - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Meat from bovine animals - minced meat - Processing plant - Not Available - food sample -Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Meat from bovine animals - minced meat - Retail - Not Available - food sample - Surveillance -Official sampling - Objective sampling

Meat from sheep - Border inspection activities - Not Available - food sample - Surveillance - Officialsampling - Objective sampling

Meat from sheep - carcase - Slaughterhouse - Not Available - food sample - carcase swabs -Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Milk, cows' - raw milk - Farm - Not Available - food sample - Surveillance - Official sampling -Objective sampling

Seeds, sprouted - Farm - Not Available - food sample - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objectivesampling


Seeds, sprouted - Processing plant - Not Available - food sample - Surveillance - Official sampling -Objective sampling


Seeds, sprouted - Retail - Not Available - food sample - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objectivesampling


Spices and herbs - fresh - Processing plant - Not Available - food sample - Surveillance - Officialsampling - Objective sampling

Spices and herbs - fresh - Retail - Not Available - food sample - Surveillance - Official sampling -Objective sampling

Spices and herbs - fresh - Wholesale - Not Available - food sample - Surveillance - Official sampling- Objective sampling

Vegetables - Retail - Not Available - food sample - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objectivesampling

Vegetables - Wholesale - Not Available - food sample - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objectivesampling

single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)

single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)

25

25

25

25

400

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Squarecentimetre

Millilitre

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

147

295

147

3

389

311

80

80

45

45

179

179

65

10

58

112

110

0

3

0

0

19

3

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

2

0


VTEC, unspecified



VTEC O103VTEC O157VTEC O26VTEC, unspecifiedVTEC O26

VTEC, unspecified



VTEC O104







VTEC, unspecified


0

3

0

0

224

112

1

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

2

0

53Belgium - 2015

Table FLAVIVIRUS in animal


Totalunitstested



BELGIUM Birds - wild - Natural habitat - Not Available - animal sample - blood - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - Selective samplingBirds - wild - Natural habitat - Not Available - animal sample - nasal swab - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - Selective samplingBirds - wild - Natural habitat - Not Available - animal sample - organ/tissue - Monitoring - passive - Official sampling - Suspect sampling

animalanimalanimal

54531375

000

West Nile virusWest Nile virusWest Nile virus

000

54Belgium - 2015

Table HISTAMINE in food

Area of SamplingMatrix - Sampling stage - Sampling origin - Sample type - Sampling context - Sampler -Sampling strategy

Samplingunit

Sampleweight

Sampleweightunit

Totalunitstested

Totalunitspositive Method Zoonoses

Metrics N of unitstested

N of unitspositive

Not Available Fish - Fishery products which have undergone enzyme maturation treatment in brine - Borderinspection activities - Not Available - Not Available - Surveillance - Official sampling -Objective samplingFish - Fishery products which have undergone enzyme maturation treatment in brine -Processing plant - Not Available - Not Available - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objectivesampling

Fish - Fishery products which have undergone enzyme maturation treatment in brine - Retail -Not Available - Not Available - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Fish - Fishery products which have undergone enzyme maturation treatment in brine -Wholesale - Not Available - Not Available - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objectivesampling

batch(food/feed)batch(food/feed)

single(food/feed)single(food/feed)

1

1

1

1

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

54

120

12

27

0

2

0

0

<100

> 400>200 TO <=400<100<100

<100

Histamine

HistamineHistamine

HistamineHistamine

Histamine

54 0

120 1

120 1

120 0

12 0

27 0

55Belgium - 2015

Table LISTERIA in food


Samplingunit

Sampleweight

Sampleweightunit

Totalunitstested



N of unitspositive

Not Available Bakery products - desserts - containing raw eggs - Retail - Not Available - Not Available -Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Bakery products - Processing plant - Not Available - Not Available - Surveillance - Officialsampling - Objective sampling

Bakery products - Processing plant - Not Available - Not Available - Surveillance - Officialsampling - Objective sampling

Bakery products - Retail - Not Available - Not Available - Surveillance - Official sampling -Objective sampling

Cheeses made from cows' milk - fresh - made from pasteurised milk - Processing plant - NotAvailable - Not Available - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Cheeses made from cows' milk - fresh - made from pasteurised milk - Processing plant - NotAvailable - Not Available - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Cheeses made from cows' milk - fresh - made from pasteurised milk - Retail - Not Available -Not Available - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Cheeses made from cows' milk - fresh - made from raw or low heat-treated milk - Farm - NotAvailable - Not Available - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Cheeses made from cows' milk - fresh - made from raw or low heat-treated milk - Farm - NotAvailable - Not Available - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Cheeses made from cows' milk - soft and semi-soft - made from pasteurised milk - Processingplant - Not Available - Not Available - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Cheeses made from cows' milk - soft and semi-soft - made from pasteurised milk - Processingplant - Not Available - Not Available - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Cheeses made from cows' milk - soft and semi-soft - made from pasteurised milk - Retail -Not Available - Not Available - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling



Cheeses made from cows' milk - soft and semi-soft - made from raw or low heat-treated milk -Processing plant - Not Available - Not Available - Surveillance - Official sampling - ObjectivesamplingCheeses made from cows' milk - soft and semi-soft - made from raw or low heat-treated milk -Processing plant - Not Available - Not Available - Surveillance - Official sampling - ObjectivesamplingCheeses made from cows' milk - soft and semi-soft - made from raw or low heat-treated milk -Retail - Not Available - Not Available - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)

1

1

25

1

1

25

1

1

25

25

25

1

1

25

1

25

1

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

50

77

77

151

29

29

39

27

27

93

93

242

73

73

91

91

250

0

0

0

0

1

1

0

0

0

1

1

0

3

3

2

2

1

<= 100

>100

<= 100

>100

Not Available

<= 100

>100

<= 100

>100

Not Available

<= 100

>100

<= 100

>100

Not Available

<= 100

>100

Not Available

<= 100

>100

<= 100

>100

Not Available

<= 100

>100

Not Available

<= 100

>100

Listeria monocytogenes




























50 0

50 0

66 0

66 0

11 0

151 0

151 0

9 0

9 0

20 1

39 0

39 0

10 0

10 0

17 0

34 0

34 0

79 1

242 0

242 0

24 0

24 0

49 3

24 0

24 0

67 2

250 0

250 1

56Belgium - 2015


Samplingunit

Sampleweight

Sampleweightunit

Totalunitstested



N of unitspositive

Not Available Cheeses made from goats' milk - unspecified - made from pasteurised milk - Farm - NotAvailable - Not Available - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Cheeses made from goats' milk - unspecified - made from pasteurised milk - Processing plant- Not Available - Not Available - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Cheeses made from goats' milk - unspecified - made from pasteurised milk - Processing plant- Not Available - Not Available - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Cheeses made from goats' milk - unspecified - made from pasteurised milk - Retail - NotAvailable - Not Available - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Cheeses made from goats' milk - unspecified - made from raw or low heat-treated milk - Farm- Not Available - Not Available - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Cheeses made from goats' milk - unspecified - made from raw or low heat-treated milk - Farm- Not Available - Not Available - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Cheeses made from goats' milk - unspecified - made from raw or low heat-treated milk -Processing plant - Not Available - Not Available - Surveillance - Official sampling - ObjectivesamplingCheeses made from goats' milk - unspecified - made from raw or low heat-treated milk -Processing plant - Not Available - Not Available - Surveillance - Official sampling - ObjectivesamplingCheeses made from goats' milk - unspecified - made from raw or low heat-treated milk - Retail- Not Available - Not Available - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Cheeses made from sheep's milk - unspecified - made from pasteurised milk - Processingplant - Not Available - Not Available - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Cheeses made from sheep's milk - unspecified - made from pasteurised milk - Retail - NotAvailable - Not Available - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Cheeses made from sheep's milk - unspecified - made from raw or low heat-treated milk -Farm - Not Available - Not Available - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Cheeses made from sheep's milk - unspecified - made from raw or low heat-treated milk -Processing plant - Not Available - Not Available - Surveillance - Official sampling - ObjectivesamplingCheeses made from sheep's milk - unspecified - made from raw or low heat-treated milk -Retail - Not Available - Not Available - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Dairy products (excluding cheeses) - butter - made from pasteurised milk - Farm - NotAvailable - Not Available - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Dairy products (excluding cheeses) - butter - made from pasteurised milk - Processing plant -Not Available - Not Available - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Dairy products (excluding cheeses) - butter - made from pasteurised milk - Retail - NotAvailable - Not Available - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Dairy products (excluding cheeses) - butter - made from raw or low heat-treated milk - Farm -Not Available - Not Available - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)

25

1

25

1

1

25

1

25

1

25

1

25

1

1

1

1

1

1

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

2

47

47

53

40

40

26

26

53

3

54

3

2

45

17

11

31

53

0

1

1

0

0

0

1

1

0

0

0

0

0

4

0

0

0

6

Not Available

<= 100

>100

Not Available

<= 100

>100

<= 100

>100

Not Available

<= 100

>100

Not Available

<= 100

>100

Not Available

<= 100

>100

Not Available

<= 100

>100

<= 100

>100

<= 100

>100

<= 100

>100

<= 100

>100

<= 100

>100































2 0

23 0

23 0

24 1

53 0

53 0

14 0

14 0

26 0

12 0

12 0

14 1

53 0

53 0

3 0

54 0

54 0

3 0

2 0

2 0

45 0

45 4

17 0

17 0

11 0

11 0

31 0

31 0

41 0

41 0

57Belgium - 2015


Samplingunit

Sampleweight

Sampleweightunit

Totalunitstested



N of unitspositive

Not Available Dairy products (excluding cheeses) - butter - made from raw or low heat-treated milk - Farm -Not Available - Not Available - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Dairy products (excluding cheeses) - butter - made from raw or low heat-treated milk -Processing plant - Not Available - Not Available - Surveillance - Official sampling - ObjectivesamplingDairy products (excluding cheeses) - butter - made from raw or low heat-treated milk -Processing plant - Not Available - Not Available - Surveillance - Official sampling - ObjectivesamplingDairy products (excluding cheeses) - dairy desserts - Farm - Not Available - Not Available -Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Dairy products (excluding cheeses) - dairy desserts - Farm - Not Available - Not Available -Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Dairy products (excluding cheeses) - dairy desserts - Processing plant - Not Available - NotAvailable - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Dairy products (excluding cheeses) - dairy desserts - Processing plant - Not Available - NotAvailable - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Dairy products (excluding cheeses) - dairy desserts - Retail - Not Available - Not Available -Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Dairy products (excluding cheeses) - dairy desserts - Retail - Not Available - Not Available -Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Dairy products (excluding cheeses) - fermented dairy products - Processing plant - NotAvailable - Not Available - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Dairy products (excluding cheeses) - fermented dairy products - Retail - Not Available - NotAvailable - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Dairy products (excluding cheeses) - ice-cream - made from pasteurised milk - Farm - NotAvailable - Not Available - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Dairy products (excluding cheeses) - ice-cream - made from pasteurised milk - Processingplant - Not Available - Not Available - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Dairy products (excluding cheeses) - ice-cream - made from pasteurised milk - Retail - NotAvailable - Not Available - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Dairy products (excluding cheeses) - milk powder and whey powder - Processing plant - NotAvailable - Not Available - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Dairy products (excluding cheeses) - yoghurt - Farm - Not Available - Not Available -Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Dairy products (excluding cheeses) - yoghurt - Processing plant - Not Available - NotAvailable - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Dairy products (excluding cheeses) - yoghurt - Retail - Not Available - Not Available -Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling


25

1

25

1

25

1

25

1

25

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

53

9

9

86

86

18

18

180

180

20

57

84

32

114

51

41

40

70

6

1

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Not Available

<= 100

>100

Not Available

<= 100

>100

Not Available

<= 100

>100

Not Available

<= 100

>100

Not Available

<= 100

>100

<= 100

>100

<= 100

>100

<= 100

>100

<= 100

>100

<= 100

>100

<= 100

>100

<= 100

>100

<= 100

>100
































12 6

8 0

8 0

1 1

72 0

72 0

14 0

2 0

2 0

16 0

105 0

105 0

75 0

20 0

20 0

57 0

57 0

84 0

84 0

32 0

32 0

114 0

114 0

51 0

51 0

41 0

41 0

40 0

40 0

70 0

70 0

58Belgium - 2015


Samplingunit

Sampleweight

Sampleweightunit

Totalunitstested



N of unitspositive

Not Available Fishery products, unspecified - ready-to-eat - chilled - Processing plant - Not Available - NotAvailable - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Fishery products, unspecified - ready-to-eat - chilled - Processing plant - Not Available - NotAvailable - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Fishery products, unspecified - ready-to-eat - chilled - Retail - Not Available - Not Available -Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Fishery products, unspecified - ready-to-eat - Retail - Not Available - Not Available -Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Fishery products, unspecified - smoked - Processing plant - Not Available - Not Available -Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Fishery products, unspecified - smoked - Processing plant - Not Available - Not Available -Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Fishery products, unspecified - smoked - Retail - Not Available - Not Available - Surveillance -Official sampling - Objective sampling

Foodstuffs intended for special nutritional uses - dried dietary foods for special medicalpurposes intended for infants below 6 months - Retail - Not Available - Not Available -Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective samplingFruits - Farm - Not Available - Not Available - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objectivesampling

Fruits - Processing plant - Not Available - Not Available - Surveillance - Official sampling -Objective sampling

Fruits and vegetables - pre-cut - ready-to-eat - Processing plant - Not Available - NotAvailable - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Fruits and vegetables - pre-cut - ready-to-eat - Processing plant - Not Available - NotAvailable - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Fruits and vegetables - pre-cut - ready-to-eat - Retail - Not Available - Not Available -Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Infant formula - dried - Processing plant - Not Available - Not Available - Surveillance - Officialsampling - Objective sampling

Infant formula - dried - Retail - Not Available - Not Available - Surveillance - Official sampling -Objective sampling

Infant formula - ready-to-eat - Retail - Not Available - Not Available - Surveillance - Officialsampling - Objective sampling

Juice - fruit juice - unpasteurised - Processing plant - Not Available - Not Available -Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Juice - fruit juice - unpasteurised - Retail - Not Available - Not Available - Surveillance -Official sampling - Objective sampling


1

25

1

1

1

25

1

25

1

1

1

25

1

25

25

25

1

1

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

181

181

271

293

60

60

142

292

45

78

112

112

104

30

564

110

8

52

1

1

0

3

1

1

0

0

0

0

1

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

<= 100

>100

Not Available

<= 100

>100

<= 100

>100

<= 100

>100

Not Available

<= 100

>100

Not Available

<= 100

>100

<= 100

>100

<= 100

>100

Not Available

<= 100

>100

Not Available

Not Available

Not Available

<= 100

>100

<= 100

>100






























119 0

119 0

62 1

271 0

271 0

293 0

293 3

30 0

30 0

30 1

142 0

142 0

292 0

45 0

45 0

78 0

78 0

45 0

45 0

67 1

104 0

104 0

30 0

564 0

110 0

8 0

8 0

52 0

52 0

59Belgium - 2015


Samplingunit

Sampleweight

Sampleweightunit

Totalunitstested



N of unitspositive

Not Available Meat from bovine animals - minced meat - intended to be eaten raw - Retail - Not Available -Not Available - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling



Meat from bovine animals - minced meat - Retail - Not Available - Not Available - Surveillance- Official sampling - Objective sampling

Meat from bovine animals and pig - meat products - Processing plant - Not Available - NotAvailable - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Meat from bovine animals and pig - meat products - Processing plant - Not Available - NotAvailable - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Meat from bovine animals and pig - meat products - Retail - Not Available - Not Available -Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Meat from bovine animals and pig - minced meat - Processing plant - Not Available - NotAvailable - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Meat from bovine animals and pig - minced meat - Processing plant - Not Available - NotAvailable - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Meat from pig - meat products - cooked ham - Processing plant - Not Available - Not Available- Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Meat from pig - meat products - cooked ham - Processing plant - Not Available - Not Available- Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Meat from pig - meat products - cooked ham - Retail - Not Available - Not Available -Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Meat from pig - meat products - cooked, ready-to-eat - Processing plant - Not Available - NotAvailable - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Meat from pig - meat products - cooked, ready-to-eat - Processing plant - Not Available - NotAvailable - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Meat from pig - meat products - cooked, ready-to-eat - Retail - Not Available - Not Available -Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Meat from pig - meat products - fermented sausages - Processing plant - Not Available - NotAvailable - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Meat from pig - meat products - fermented sausages - Processing plant - Not Available - NotAvailable - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Meat from pig - meat products - fermented sausages - Retail - Not Available - Not Available -Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling


1

1

25

1

1

25

1

1

1

25

1

25

1

1

25

1

1

25

1

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

147

306

306

225

582

582

595

44

44

44

117

117

114

119

119

115

101

101

101

0

7

7

0

18

18

0

5

5

5

4

4

0

1

1

0

4

4

0

<= 100

>100

<= 100

>100

Not Available

<= 100

>100

<= 100

>100

Not Available

<= 100

>100

<= 100

>100

Not Available

Not Available

<= 100

>100

Not Available

<= 100

>100

<= 100

>100

Not Available

<= 100

>100

<= 100

>100

Not Available

<= 100

>100
































147 0

147 0

204 0

204 0

102 7

225 0

225 0

142 0

142 0

440 18

595 0

595 0

12 0

12 0

16 0

16 5

24 0

24 0

93 4

114 0

114 0

18 0

18 0

101 1

115 0

115 0

87 0

87 0

14 4

101 0

101 0

60Belgium - 2015


Samplingunit

Sampleweight

Sampleweightunit

Totalunitstested



N of unitspositive

Not Available Meat from pig - meat products - raw ham - Processing plant - Not Available - Not Available -Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Meat from pig - meat products - raw ham - Processing plant - Not Available - Not Available -Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Meat from pig - meat products - raw ham - Retail - Not Available - Not Available - Surveillance- Official sampling - Objective sampling

Meat from pig - minced meat - intended to be eaten raw - Retail - Not Available - NotAvailable - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling



Meat from poultry, unspecified - meat products - cooked, ready-to-eat - Processing plant - NotAvailable - Not Available - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Meat from poultry, unspecified - meat products - cooked, ready-to-eat - Processing plant - NotAvailable - Not Available - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Meat from poultry, unspecified - meat products - cooked, ready-to-eat - Retail - Not Available -Not Available - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Milk, cows' - raw milk - Farm - Not Available - Not Available - Surveillance - Official sampling -Objective sampling

Other processed food products and prepared dishes - unspecified - containing raw egg -chilled - Retail - Not Available - Not Available - Surveillance - Official sampling - ObjectivesamplingOther processed food products and prepared dishes - unspecified - ready-to-eat foods - Retail- Not Available - Not Available - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Seeds, sprouted - Farm - Not Available - Not Available - Surveillance - Official sampling -Objective sampling

Seeds, sprouted - Processing plant - Not Available - Not Available - Surveillance - Officialsampling - Objective sampling

Seeds, sprouted - Retail - Not Available - Not Available - Surveillance - Official sampling -Objective sampling

Surimi - Border inspection activities - Not Available - Not Available - Surveillance - Officialsampling - Objective sampling

Surimi - Processing plant - Not Available - Not Available - Surveillance - Official sampling -Objective sampling

Surimi - Processing plant - Not Available - Not Available - Surveillance - Official sampling -Objective sampling


1

25

1

1

1

1

25

1

25

1

1

1

1

1

25

1

1

1

25

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

112

112

114

36

53

53

53

147

147

148

17

25

831

54

45

65

11

10

10

3

3

0

0

5

5

5

1

1

0

0

0

2

0

0

0

0

0

0

<= 100

>100

Not Available

<= 100

>100

<= 100

>100

<= 100

>100

Not Available

Not Available

<= 100

>100

Not Available

<= 100

>100

<= 100

>100

<= 100

>100

<= 100

>100

<= 100

>100

Not Available

<= 100

>100

<= 100

>100

<= 100

>100

Not Available

































60 0

60 0

52 3

114 0

114 0

36 0

36 0

15 0

15 0

14 2

24 3

78 0

78 0

69 1

148 0

148 0

17 0

17 0

25 0

25 0

831 0

831 2

54 0

54 0

45 0

65 0

65 0

11 0

11 0

7 0

7 0

3 0

61Belgium - 2015


Samplingunit

Sampleweight

Sampleweightunit

Totalunitstested



N of unitspositive

Not Available Surimi - Retail - Not Available - Not Available - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objectivesampling

Vegetables - Border inspection activities - Not Available - Not Available - Surveillance -Official sampling - Objective sampling

Vegetables - Farm - Not Available - Not Available - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objectivesampling

Vegetables - Retail - Not Available - Not Available - Surveillance - Official sampling -Objective sampling

single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)

1

1

1

1

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

31

25

73

73

0

0

0

1

<= 100

>100

<= 100

>100

<= 100

>100

<= 100

>100









31 0

31 0

25 0

25 0

73 0

73 0

73 0

73 1

62Belgium - 2015

Table LYSSAVIRUS in animal


Totalunitstested



Not Available Bats - wild - Natural habitat - Not Available - Not Available - Surveillance - Official sampling - Suspect samplingCats - Veterinary clinics - Not Available - Not Available - Surveillance - Official sampling - Suspect samplingCattle (bovine animals) - Farm - Not Available - Not Available - Surveillance - Official sampling - Suspect samplingDogs - Veterinary clinics - Not Available - Not Available - Surveillance - Official sampling - Suspect samplingFoxes - wild - Natural habitat - Not Available - Not Available - Surveillance - Official sampling - Suspect samplingSheep - Farm - Not Available - Not Available - Surveillance - Official sampling - Suspect samplingSolipeds, domestic - Veterinary clinics - Not Available - Not Available - Surveillance - Official sampling - Suspect sampling

animalanimalanimalanimalanimalanimalanimal

1451681621441

0000000

LyssavirusLyssavirusLyssavirusLyssavirusLyssavirusLyssavirusLyssavirus

0000000

63Belgium - 2015

Table MYCOBACTERIUM in animal


Totalunitstested



Prov. Namur Alpacas - farmed - Farm - United Kingdom - animal sample - organ/tissue - Clinical investigations - Official sampling - Suspect sampling animal 1 1 Mycobacterium bovis 1

64Belgium - 2015

Table SALMONELLA in animal

Area of SamplingMatrix - Sampling stage - Sampling origin - Sample type - Sampling context - Sampler - Samplingstrategy

Samplingunit

N of flocksunder controlprogramme

Targetverification

Total unitstested



Not Available Gallus gallus (fowl) - breeding flocks, unspecified - adult - Farm - Not Available - environmental sample -boot swabs - Control and eradication programmes - Official and industry sampling - Census

Gallus gallus (fowl) - breeding flocks, unspecified - day-old chicks - Farm - Not Available - environmentalsample - delivery box liner - Control and eradication programmes - Industry sampling - CensusGallus gallus (fowl) - breeding flocks, unspecified - during rearing period - Farm - Not Available -environmental sample - boot swabs - Control and eradication programmes - Official and industry sampling -CensusGallus gallus (fowl) - broilers - before slaughter - Farm - Not Available - environmental sample - boot swabs -Control and eradication programmes - Industry sampling - Census

Gallus gallus (fowl) - broilers - before slaughter - Farm - Not Available - environmental sample - boot swabs -Control and eradication programmes - Official and industry sampling - Census

herd/flock

herd/flockherd/flock

herd/flock

herd/flock

584

9483

9483

Y

N_A

N_A

N_A

Y

584

213

340

9465

9483

14

0

3

130

136

Salmonella 4,12:i:-Salmonella InfantisSalmonella JerusalemSalmonella LivingstoneSalmonella MbandakaSalmonella MinnesotaSalmonella Other serovarsSalmonella SenftenbergSalmonella spp., unspecifiedSalmonella spp., unspecified

Salmonella Agona

Salmonella Infantis

Salmonella 1,4,[5],12:i:-Salmonella 4,12:i:-Salmonella 4,5,12:i:-Salmonella 6,7:r:-Salmonella AgonaSalmonella CerroSalmonella ColindaleSalmonella DerbySalmonella EnteritidisSalmonella GaminaraSalmonella GiveSalmonella InfantisSalmonella LivingstoneSalmonella MbandakaSalmonella MeleagridisSalmonella NyborgSalmonella Other serovarsSalmonella RissenSalmonella SenftenbergSalmonella TyphimuriumSalmonella 1,4,[5],12:i:-Salmonella 4,12:i:-Salmonella 4,5,12:i:-Salmonella 6,7:r:-Salmonella AgonaSalmonella CerroSalmonella ColindaleSalmonella DerbySalmonella EnteritidisSalmonella Gaminara

111171111

0

2

11131

1211

106

111

3511

81594271131

1311

106

11

65Belgium - 2015


Samplingunit


Targetverification

Total unitstested



Not Available Gallus gallus (fowl) - broilers - before slaughter - Farm - Not Available - environmental sample - boot swabs -Control and eradication programmes - Official and industry sampling - Census

Gallus gallus (fowl) - broilers - before slaughter - Farm - Not Available - environmental sample - boot swabs -Control and eradication programmes - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Gallus gallus (fowl) - broilers - day-old chicks - Farm - Not Available - environmental sample - delivery boxliner - Control and eradication programmes - Industry sampling - Census

Gallus gallus (fowl) - broilers - Slaughterhouse - Not Available - animal sample - caecum - Surveillance -Official sampling - Objective sampling

Gallus gallus (fowl) - laying hens - adult - Farm - Not Available - environmental sample - boot swabs anddust - Control and eradication programmes - Official and industry sampling - Census

Gallus gallus (fowl) - laying hens - day-old chicks - Farm - Not Available - environmental sample - deliverybox liner - Control and eradication programmes - Industry sampling - Census

herd/flock

herd/flock

herd/flock

animal

herd/flock

herd/flock

9483

9483

716

Y

N_A

N_A

N_A

Y

N_A

9483

80

5814

220

716

257

136

7

17

11

37

0

Salmonella GiveSalmonella InfantisSalmonella LivingstoneSalmonella MbandakaSalmonella MeleagridisSalmonella NyborgSalmonella Other serovarsSalmonella RissenSalmonella SenftenbergSalmonella TyphimuriumSalmonella AgonaSalmonella LivingstoneSalmonella MbandakaSalmonella RissenSalmonella EnteritidisSalmonella LivingstoneSalmonella MbandakaSalmonella MinnesotaSalmonella Paratyphi BSalmonella TyphimuriumSalmonella AgonaSalmonella BraenderupSalmonella DerbySalmonella EnteritidisSalmonella MbandakaSalmonella spp., unspecifiedSalmonella TyphimuriumSalmonella AbaetetubaSalmonella EnteritidisSalmonella GaminaraSalmonella HavanaSalmonella IdikanSalmonella InfantisSalmonella KingstonSalmonella LivingstoneSalmonella MbandakaSalmonella MeleagridisSalmonella MontevideoSalmonella Not typeableSalmonella NyborgSalmonella RissenSalmonella SenftenbergSalmonella TennesseeSalmonella spp., unspecified

1351310

159527123152621121114111914441221121431

0

66Belgium - 2015


Samplingunit


Targetverification

Total unitstested



Not Available Gallus gallus (fowl) - laying hens - during rearing period - flocks under control programme - Farm - NotAvailable - environmental sample - boot swabs - Control and eradication programmes - Industry sampling -Census

Gallus gallus (fowl) - laying hens - Slaughterhouse - Not Available - animal sample - caecum - Surveillance -Official sampling - Objective sampling

Meat from spent hens (Gallus gallus) - fresh - laying hens - Slaughterhouse - Not Available - food sample -Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Turkeys - fattening flocks - before slaughter - Farm - Not Available - environmental sample - boot swabs -Control and eradication programmes - Industry sampling - Census

Turkeys - fattening flocks - before slaughter - Farm - Not Available - environmental sample - boot swabs -Control and eradication programmes - Official and industry sampling - Census

herd/flock

animal

single(food/feed)

herd/flock

herd/flock

183

N_A

N_A

N_A

N_A

Y

269

59

705

183

183

5

3

62

9

9

Salmonella EnteritidisSalmonella GaminaraSalmonella IdikanSalmonella MbandakaSalmonella SenftenbergSalmonella MbandakaSalmonella spp., unspecifiedSalmonella AgonaSalmonella EnteritidisSalmonella GiveSalmonella InfantisSalmonella LivingstoneSalmonella MbandakaSalmonella MontevideoSalmonella spp., unspecifiedSalmonella TyphimuriumSalmonella 1,4,12:i:-Salmonella BrandenburgSalmonella SenftenbergSalmonella spp., unspecifiedSalmonella TyphimuriumSalmonella 1,4,12:i:-Salmonella BrandenburgSalmonella SenftenbergSalmonella spp., unspecifiedSalmonella Typhimurium

11111214

2518

2251321321213212

67Belgium - 2015

Table SALMONELLA in food


Sampleweight

Sampleweight unit

Totalunitstested



Not Available Bakery products - desserts - containing raw eggs - Retail - Not Available - food sample -Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Bakery products - pastry - Processing plant - Not Available - food sample - Surveillance - Officialsampling - Objective sampling

Bakery products - pastry - Retail - Not Available - food sample - Surveillance - Official sampling -Objective sampling

Cheeses made from cows' milk - fresh - made from pasteurised milk - Farm - Not Available - foodsample - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Cheeses made from cows' milk - fresh - made from pasteurised milk - Processing plant - NotAvailable - food sample - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Cheeses made from cows' milk - fresh - made from pasteurised milk - Retail - Not Available - foodsample - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Cheeses made from cows' milk - fresh - made from raw or low heat-treated milk - Farm - NotAvailable - food sample - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Cheeses made from cows' milk - soft and semi-soft - made from pasteurised milk - Farm - NotAvailable - food sample - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Cheeses made from cows' milk - soft and semi-soft - made from pasteurised milk - Processing plant- Not Available - food sample - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Cheeses made from cows' milk - soft and semi-soft - made from pasteurised milk - Retail - NotAvailable - food sample - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Cheeses made from cows' milk - soft and semi-soft - made from raw or low heat-treated milk -Farm - Not Available - food sample - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Cheeses made from cows' milk - soft and semi-soft - made from raw or low heat-treated milk -Processing plant - Not Available - food sample - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Cheeses made from cows' milk - soft and semi-soft - made from raw or low heat-treated milk -Retail - Not Available - food sample - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Cheeses made from goats' milk - unspecified - made from pasteurised milk - Farm - Not Available -food sample - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Cheeses made from goats' milk - unspecified - made from pasteurised milk - Processing plant - NotAvailable - food sample - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Cheeses made from goats' milk - unspecified - made from pasteurised milk - Retail - Not Available -food sample - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Cheeses made from goats' milk - unspecified - made from raw or low heat-treated milk - Farm - NotAvailable - food sample - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling


25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

50

31

60

16

38

39

23

66

78

62

33

77

66

2

45

43

22

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

68Belgium - 2015


Sampleweight

Sampleweight unit

Totalunitstested



Not Available Cheeses made from goats' milk - unspecified - made from raw or low heat-treated milk - Processingplant - Not Available - food sample - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Cheeses made from goats' milk - unspecified - made from raw or low heat-treated milk - Retail -Not Available - food sample - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Cheeses made from sheep's milk - unspecified - made from pasteurised milk - Processing plant - NotAvailable - food sample - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Cheeses made from sheep's milk - unspecified - made from pasteurised milk - Retail - Not Available- food sample - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Cheeses made from sheep's milk - unspecified - made from raw or low heat-treated milk - Farm -Not Available - food sample - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Cheeses made from sheep's milk - unspecified - made from raw or low heat-treated milk -Processing plant - Not Available - food sample - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Cheeses made from sheep's milk - unspecified - made from raw or low heat-treated milk - Retail -Not Available - food sample - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Chocolate - Processing plant - Not Available - food sample - Surveillance - Official sampling -Objective sampling

Chocolate - Retail - Not Available - food sample - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objectivesampling

Crustaceans - unspecified - cooked - Processing plant - Not Available - food sample - Surveillance -Official sampling - Objective sampling

Crustaceans - unspecified - cooked - Retail - Not Available - food sample - Surveillance - Officialsampling - Objective sampling

Crustaceans - unspecified - cooked - Wholesale - Not Available - food sample - Surveillance - Officialsampling - Objective sampling

Crustaceans - unspecified - raw - Border inspection activities - Not Available - food sample -Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Crustaceans - unspecified - raw - Processing plant - Not Available - food sample - Surveillance -Official sampling - Objective sampling

Crustaceans - unspecified - raw - Retail - Not Available - food sample - Surveillance - Officialsampling - Objective sampling

Dairy products (excluding cheeses) - butter - made from pasteurised milk - Border inspectionactivities - Not Available - food sample - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Dairy products (excluding cheeses) - butter - made from pasteurised milk - Farm - Not Available -food sample - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Dairy products (excluding cheeses) - butter - made from pasteurised milk - Processing plant - NotAvailable - food sample - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling


25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

10

10

10

25

25

25

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

28

42

3

43

3

2

45

37

55

50

46

115

9

30

30

1

9

6

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella Other serovars

Salmonella

Salmonella 4,5:i:-

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

69Belgium - 2015


Sampleweight

Sampleweight unit

Totalunitstested



Not Available Dairy products (excluding cheeses) - butter - made from pasteurised milk - Retail - Not Available -food sample - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Dairy products (excluding cheeses) - butter - made from raw or low heat-treated milk - Farm - NotAvailable - food sample - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Dairy products (excluding cheeses) - butter - made from raw or low heat-treated milk - Processingplant - Not Available - food sample - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Dairy products (excluding cheeses) - dairy desserts - Farm - Not Available - food sample -Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Dairy products (excluding cheeses) - dairy desserts - Retail - Not Available - food sample -Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Dairy products (excluding cheeses) - ice-cream - made from pasteurised milk - Farm - Not Available- food sample - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Dairy products (excluding cheeses) - ice-cream - made from pasteurised milk - Processing plant -Not Available - food sample - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Dairy products (excluding cheeses) - ice-cream - made from pasteurised milk - Retail - Not Available- food sample - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Dairy products (excluding cheeses) - milk powder and whey powder - Processing plant - NotAvailable - food sample - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Egg products - Border inspection activities - Not Available - food sample - Surveillance - Officialsampling - Objective sampling

Egg products - Processing plant - Not Available - food sample - Surveillance - Official sampling -Objective sampling

Egg products - Retail - Not Available - food sample - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objectivesampling

Fishery products, unspecified - ready-to-eat - chilled - Processing plant - Not Available - food sample- Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Fishery products, unspecified - ready-to-eat - chilled - Retail - Not Available - food sample -Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Fishery products, unspecified - ready-to-eat - Retail - Not Available - food sample - Surveillance -Official sampling - Objective sampling

Fishery products, unspecified - smoked - Retail - Not Available - food sample - Surveillance - Officialsampling - Objective sampling

Foodstuffs intended for special nutritional uses - dried dietary foods for special medical purposesintended for infants below 6 months - Retail - Not Available - food sample - Surveillance - Officialsampling - Objective samplingFrogs leg - Border inspection activities - Not Available - food sample - Surveillance - Officialsampling - Objective sampling


single(food/feed)

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

31

43

5

28

46

32

16

46

51

2

40

20

66

116

93

51

117

7

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

5

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella HvittingfossSalmonella SaintpaulSalmonella ThompsonSalmonella Urbana

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1121

70Belgium - 2015


Sampleweight

Sampleweight unit

Totalunitstested



Not Available Fruits - non-pre-cut - Farm - Not Available - food sample - Surveillance - Official sampling -Objective sampling

Fruits - non-pre-cut - Processing plant - Not Available - food sample - Surveillance - Officialsampling - Objective sampling

Fruits - non-pre-cut - Retail - Not Available - food sample - Surveillance - Official sampling -Objective sampling

Fruits and vegetables - pre-cut - ready-to-eat - Processing plant - Not Available - food sample -Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Fruits and vegetables - pre-cut - ready-to-eat - Retail - Not Available - food sample - Surveillance -Official sampling - Objective sampling

Infant formula - dried - Processing plant - Not Available - food sample - Surveillance - Officialsampling - Objective sampling

Infant formula - dried - Retail - Not Available - food sample - Surveillance - Official sampling -Objective sampling

Infant formula - ready-to-eat - Hospital or medical care facility - Not Available - food sample -Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Juice - fruit juice - unpasteurised - Processing plant - Not Available - food sample - Surveillance -Official sampling - Objective sampling

Juice - fruit juice - unpasteurised - Retail - Not Available - food sample - Surveillance - Officialsampling - Objective sampling

Meat from bovine animals - carcase - Slaughterhouse - Not Available - food sample - carcase swabs- Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Meat from bovine animals - minced meat - intended to be eaten cooked - Retail - Not Available -food sample - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Meat from bovine animals - minced meat - intended to be eaten raw - Retail - Not Available - foodsample - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Meat from bovine animals - minced meat - Processing plant - Not Available - food sample -Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Meat from bovine animals - minced meat - Retail - Not Available - food sample - Surveillance -Official sampling - Objective sampling

Meat from bovine animals and pig - meat preparation - intended to be eaten cooked - Processingplant - Not Available - food sample - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Meat from bovine animals and pig - meat preparation - intended to be eaten raw - Processing plant- Not Available - food sample - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Meat from bovine animals and pig - minced meat - intended to be eaten cooked - Retail - NotAvailable - food sample - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling


25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

1600

10

25

25

25

10

25

10

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Squarecentimetre

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

45

35

82

31

59

30

185

81

8

53

884

16

78

123

45

59

63

7

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

2

0

0

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella 4,5,12:-:-

Salmonella 4,5:i:-

Salmonella

Salmonella

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

1

0

0

71Belgium - 2015


Sampleweight

Sampleweight unit

Totalunitstested



Not Available Meat from bovine animals and pig - minced meat - intended to be eaten raw - Retail - Not Available- food sample - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - carcase - Retail - Not Available - food sample - Surveillance -Official sampling - Objective sampling

Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - carcase - Slaughterhouse - Not Available - food sample -Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Meat from other animal species or not specified - meat products - Border inspection activities - NotAvailable - food sample - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Meat from other animal species or not specified - meat products - heat treated, ready to eat -Processing plant - Not Available - food sample - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Meat from other animal species or not specified - meat products - heat treated, ready to eat - Retail- Not Available - food sample - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Meat from other animal species or not specified - mechanically separated meat (MSM) - soft-type -Processing plant - Not Available - food sample - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Meat from other poultry species - meat products - raw and intended to be eaten raw - Processingplant - Not Available - food sample - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Meat from other poultry species - meat products - raw and intended to be eaten raw - Retail - NotAvailable - food sample - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Meat from pig - carcase - Slaughterhouse - Not Available - food sample - carcase swabs -Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling


single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)

25

25

1

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

600

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Squarecentimetre

8

81

291

900

5

269

288

30

44

46

1189

4

4

7

91

0

1

0

1

0

0

89

Salmonella 4,5:i:-

Salmonella Livingstone

Salmonella Mbandaka

Salmonella spp., unspecified

Salmonella DerbySalmonella InfantisSalmonella MbandakaSalmonella Other serovarsSalmonella 1,4,[5],12:i:-Salmonella AgonaSalmonella GiveSalmonella IndianaSalmonella InfantisSalmonella LivingstoneSalmonella MbandakaSalmonella Other serovarsSalmonella SenftenbergSalmonella spp., unspecifiedSalmonella ThompsonSalmonella TyphimuriumSalmonella VirchowSalmonella

Salmonella Infantis

Salmonella

Salmonella Saintpaul

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella BrandenburgSalmonella DerbySalmonella HavanaSalmonella IdikanSalmonella InfantisSalmonella LivingstoneSalmonella MontevideoSalmonella RissenSalmonella spp., unspecifiedSalmonella Typhimurium

3

1

2

2

12222

14132

1418

221

101120

1

0

1

0

0

221111214

1343

72Belgium - 2015


Sampleweight

Sampleweight unit

Totalunitstested



Not Available Meat from pig - fresh - Cutting plant - Not Available - food sample - Surveillance - Official sampling- Objective sampling

Meat from pig - meat products - cooked, ready-to-eat - Processing plant - Not Available - foodsample - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Meat from pig - meat products - cooked, ready-to-eat - Retail - Not Available - food sample -Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Meat from pig - meat products - fermented sausages - Processing plant - Not Available - foodsample - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Meat from pig - meat products - fermented sausages - Retail - Not Available - food sample -Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Meat from pig - minced meat - intended to be eaten cooked - Retail - Not Available - food sample -Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Meat from pig - minced meat - intended to be eaten raw - Retail - Not Available - food sample -Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Meat from poultry, unspecified - fresh - Cutting plant - Not Available - food sample - Surveillance -Official sampling - Objective sampling

Meat from poultry, unspecified - fresh - skinned - Retail - Not Available - food sample - Surveillance- Official sampling - Objective sampling

Meat from poultry, unspecified - fresh - with skin - Retail - Not Available - food sample -Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Meat from poultry, unspecified - meat products - cooked, ready-to-eat - Processing plant - NotAvailable - food sample - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Meat from poultry, unspecified - meat products - cooked, ready-to-eat - Retail - Not Available - foodsample - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

single(food/feed)

single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)

single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)

25

25

25

25

25

10

25

25

25

25

25

25

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

340

49

156

50

46

27

10

402

54

54

50

46

17

0

1

0

0

2

0

25

1

4

1

1

Salmonella 4,12:i:-Salmonella AbonySalmonella DerbySalmonella GallinarumSalmonella HavanaSalmonella LondonSalmonella Other serovarsSalmonella RissenSalmonella spp., unspecifiedSalmonella TyphimuriumSalmonella

Salmonella Montevideo

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella Derby

Salmonella Lagos

Salmonella

Salmonella 4,5,12:-:-Salmonella AgonaSalmonella EnteritidisSalmonella GiveSalmonella IndianaSalmonella InfantisSalmonella JerusalemSalmonella MbandakaSalmonella Other serovarsSalmonella SaintpaulSalmonella spp., unspecifiedSalmonella TyphimuriumSalmonella Other serovars

Salmonella Agona


Salmonella Give


21211121150

1

0

0

1

1

0

1161112261211

2

2

1

1

73Belgium - 2015


Sampleweight

Sampleweight unit

Totalunitstested



Not Available Meat from poultry, unspecified - meat products - Processing plant - Not Available - food sample -Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Meat from rabbit - meat preparation - intended to be eaten cooked - Processing plant - NotAvailable - food sample - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Meat from rabbit - meat preparation - intended to be eaten cooked - Retail - Not Available - foodsample - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Meat from sheep - carcase - Slaughterhouse - Not Available - food sample - carcase swabs -Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Milk, cows' - raw milk - Farm - Not Available - food sample - Surveillance - Official sampling -Objective sampling

Other processed food products and prepared dishes - unspecified - containing raw egg - chilled -Retail - Not Available - food sample - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Other processed food products and prepared dishes - unspecified - ready-to-eat foods - Retail - NotAvailable - food sample - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling




Spices and herbs - dried - Processing plant - Not Available - food sample - Surveillance - Officialsampling - Objective sampling

Spices and herbs - dried - Retail - Not Available - food sample - Surveillance - Official sampling -Objective sampling

Spices and herbs - fresh - Farm - Not Available - food sample - Surveillance - Official sampling -Objective sampling

Spices and herbs - fresh - Processing plant - Not Available - food sample - Surveillance - Officialsampling - Objective sampling

Spices and herbs - fresh - Retail - Not Available - food sample - Surveillance - Official sampling -Objective sampling

Surimi - Border inspection activities - Not Available - food sample - Surveillance - Official sampling -Objective sampling

Surimi - Processing plant - Not Available - food sample - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objectivesampling

Surimi - Retail - Not Available - food sample - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling


25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

59

74

80

196

17

5

366

35

20

30

45

46

40

46

5

11

10

31

0

2

2

2

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Salmonella

Salmonella Other serovars

Salmonella Enteritidis

Salmonella Kentucky


Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella Kasenyi

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

0

2

1

1

2

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

74Belgium - 2015


Sampleweight

Sampleweight unit

Totalunitstested



Not Available Vegetables - Farm - Not Available - food sample - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objectivesampling

Vegetables - Retail - Not Available - food sample - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objectivesampling


25

25

Gram

Gram

45

46

0

0

Salmonella

Salmonella

0

0

75Belgium - 2015

Table SALMONELLA in feed


Sampleweight

Sampleweight unit

Totalunitstested



Not Available Compound feedingstuffs for cattle - Farm - Not Available - feed sample - Surveillance - Officialsampling - Objective sampling

Compound feedingstuffs for cattle - Feed mill - Not Available - feed sample - Surveillance - Officialsampling - Objective sampling

Compound feedingstuffs for cattle - Retail - Not Available - feed sample - Surveillance - Officialsampling - Objective sampling

Compound feedingstuffs for cattle - Unspecified - Not Available - feed sample - Surveillance - Officialsampling - Objective sampling

Compound feedingstuffs for cattle - Wholesale - Not Available - feed sample - Surveillance - Officialsampling - Objective sampling

Compound feedingstuffs for fish - Farm - Not Available - feed sample - Surveillance - Officialsampling - Objective sampling

Compound feedingstuffs for fish - Feed mill - Not Available - feed sample - Surveillance - Officialsampling - Objective sampling

Compound feedingstuffs for fish - Packing centre - Not Available - feed sample - Surveillance -Official sampling - Objective sampling

Compound feedingstuffs for fish - Retail - Not Available - feed sample - Surveillance - Officialsampling - Objective sampling

Compound feedingstuffs for fish - Unspecified - Not Available - feed sample - Surveillance - Officialsampling - Objective sampling

Compound feedingstuffs for fish - Wholesale - Not Available - feed sample - Surveillance - Officialsampling - Objective sampling

Compound feedingstuffs for horses - Farm - Not Available - feed sample - Surveillance - Officialsampling - Objective sampling

Compound feedingstuffs for horses - Feed mill - Not Available - feed sample - Surveillance - Officialsampling - Objective sampling

Compound feedingstuffs for horses - Unspecified - Not Available - feed sample - Surveillance -Official sampling - Objective sampling

Compound feedingstuffs for horses - Veterinary clinics - Not Available - feed sample - Surveillance -Official sampling - Objective sampling

Compound feedingstuffs for horses - Wholesale - Not Available - feed sample - Surveillance - Officialsampling - Objective sampling

Compound feedingstuffs for pigs - Farm - Not Available - feed sample - Surveillance - Officialsampling - Objective sampling

batch(food/feed)batch(food/feed)batch(food/feed)batch(food/feed)batch(food/feed)batch(food/feed)batch(food/feed)batch(food/feed)batch(food/feed)batch(food/feed)batch(food/feed)batch(food/feed)batch(food/feed)batch(food/feed)batch(food/feed)batch(food/feed)batch(food/feed)

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

43

38

1

5

5

6

5

1

1

1

4

7

14

2

1

5

45

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Salmonella Montevideo

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

76Belgium - 2015


Sampleweight

Sampleweight unit

Totalunitstested



Not Available Compound feedingstuffs for pigs - Feed mill - Not Available - feed sample - Surveillance - Officialsampling - Objective sampling

Compound feedingstuffs for pigs - Unspecified - Not Available - feed sample - Surveillance - Officialsampling - Objective sampling

Compound feedingstuffs for pigs - Wholesale - Not Available - feed sample - Surveillance - Officialsampling - Objective sampling

Compound feedingstuffs for poultry (non specified) - Farm - Not Available - feed sample -Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Compound feedingstuffs for poultry (non specified) - Feed mill - Not Available - feed sample -Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Compound feedingstuffs for poultry (non specified) - Unspecified - Not Available - feed sample -Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Compound feedingstuffs for poultry (non specified) - Wholesale - Not Available - feed sample -Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Compound feedingstuffs for poultry, breeders - Farm - Not Available - feed sample - Surveillance -Official sampling - Objective sampling

Compound feedingstuffs for poultry, breeders - Feed mill - Not Available - feed sample -Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Compound feedingstuffs for poultry, breeders - Hatchery - Not Available - feed sample - Surveillance- Official sampling - Objective sampling

Compound feedingstuffs for poultry, breeders - Retail - Not Available - feed sample - Surveillance -Official sampling - Objective sampling

Compound feedingstuffs for poultry, breeders - Unspecified - Not Available - feed sample -Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Compound feedingstuffs for poultry, breeders - Wholesale - Not Available - feed sample -Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Compound feedingstuffs for poultry, broilers - Farm - Not Available - feed sample - Surveillance -Official sampling - Objective sampling

Compound feedingstuffs for poultry, broilers - Feed mill - Not Available - feed sample - Surveillance- Official sampling - Objective sampling

Compound feedingstuffs for poultry, broilers - Hatchery - Not Available - feed sample - Surveillance- Official sampling - Objective sampling

Compound feedingstuffs for poultry, broilers - Retail - Not Available - feed sample - Surveillance -Official sampling - Objective sampling

Compound feedingstuffs for poultry, broilers - Unspecified - Not Available - feed sample -Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

batch(food/feed)batch(food/feed)batch(food/feed)batch(food/feed)batch(food/feed)batch(food/feed)batch(food/feed)batch(food/feed)batch(food/feed)batch(food/feed)batch(food/feed)batch(food/feed)batch(food/feed)batch(food/feed)batch(food/feed)batch(food/feed)batch(food/feed)batch(food/feed)

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

37

7

2

7

1

1

3

43

29

4

1

5

7

26

21

1

1

2

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella Cerro

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella 3,19:-:-

Salmonella Derby

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

1

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

77Belgium - 2015


Sampleweight

Sampleweight unit

Totalunitstested



Not Available Compound feedingstuffs for poultry, broilers - Wholesale - Not Available - feed sample - Surveillance- Official sampling - Objective sampling

Compound feedingstuffs for poultry, laying hens - Farm - Not Available - feed sample - Surveillance- Official sampling - Objective sampling

Compound feedingstuffs for poultry, laying hens - Feed mill - Not Available - feed sample -Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Compound feedingstuffs for poultry, laying hens - Retail - Not Available - feed sample - Surveillance- Official sampling - Objective sampling

Compound feedingstuffs for poultry, laying hens - Wholesale - Not Available - feed sample -Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Compound feedingstuffs for poultry, pigeons - Feed mill - Not Available - feed sample - Surveillance- Official sampling - Objective sampling

Compound feedingstuffs for rabbits - Feed mill - Not Available - feed sample - Surveillance - Officialsampling - Objective sampling

Compound feedingstuffs for rabbits - Retail - Not Available - feed sample - Surveillance - Officialsampling - Objective sampling

Compound feedingstuffs for rabbits - Wholesale - Not Available - feed sample - Surveillance - Officialsampling - Objective sampling

Compound feedingstuffs for sheep - Catering - Not Available - feed sample - Surveillance - Officialsampling - Objective sampling

Compound feedingstuffs for sheep - Farm - Not Available - feed sample - Surveillance - Officialsampling - Objective sampling

Compound feedingstuffs for sheep - Feed mill - Not Available - feed sample - Surveillance - Officialsampling - Objective sampling

Compound feedingstuffs for sheep - Retail - Not Available - feed sample - Surveillance - Officialsampling - Objective sampling

Compound feedingstuffs for sheep - Unspecified - Not Available - feed sample - Surveillance -Official sampling - Objective sampling

Compound feedingstuffs for sheep - Wholesale - Not Available - feed sample - Surveillance - Officialsampling - Objective sampling

Compound feedingstuffs for turkeys - Farm - Not Available - feed sample - Surveillance - Officialsampling - Objective sampling

Compound feedingstuffs for turkeys - Feed mill - Not Available - feed sample - Surveillance - Officialsampling - Objective sampling

Compound feedingstuffs for turkeys - Wholesale - Not Available - feed sample - Surveillance -Official sampling - Objective sampling


25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

1

20

14

1

5

4

3

1

1

1

8

10

1

2

1

7

2

1

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Salmonella

Salmonella 4,12:-:1,2

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

78Belgium - 2015


Sampleweight

Sampleweight unit

Totalunitstested



Not Available Compound feedingstuffs, not specified - Border inspection activities - Not Available - feed sample -Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Compound feedingstuffs, not specified - Farm - Not Available - feed sample - Surveillance - Officialsampling - Objective sampling

Compound feedingstuffs, not specified - Feed mill - Not Available - feed sample - Surveillance -Official sampling - Objective sampling

Feed material of cereal grain origin - barley derived - Feed mill - Not Available - feed sample -Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Feed material of cereal grain origin - barley derived - Wholesale - Not Available - feed sample -Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Feed material of cereal grain origin - Feed mill - Not Available - feed sample - Surveillance - Officialsampling - Objective sampling

Feed material of cereal grain origin - maize derived - Conservation facilities - Not Available - feedsample - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Feed material of cereal grain origin - maize derived - Feed mill - Not Available - feed sample -Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Feed material of cereal grain origin - maize derived - Unspecified - Not Available - feed sample -Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Feed material of cereal grain origin - maize derived - Wholesale - Not Available - feed sample -Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Feed material of cereal grain origin - oat derived - Feed mill - Not Available - feed sample -Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Feed material of cereal grain origin - oat derived - Unspecified - Not Available - feed sample -Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Feed material of cereal grain origin - other cereal grain derived - Conservation facilities - NotAvailable - feed sample - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Feed material of cereal grain origin - other cereal grain derived - Unspecified - Not Available - feedsample - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Feed material of cereal grain origin - other cereal grain derived - Wholesale - Not Available - feedsample - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Feed material of cereal grain origin - Unspecified - Not Available - feed sample - Surveillance -Official sampling - Objective sampling

Feed material of cereal grain origin - wheat derived - Feed mill - Not Available - feed sample -Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Feed material of cereal grain origin - wheat derived - Retail - Not Available - feed sample -Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling


25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

7

1

2

3

4

9

2

6

5

1

1

1

2

2

2

17

7

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

79Belgium - 2015


Sampleweight

Sampleweight unit

Totalunitstested



Not Available Feed material of cereal grain origin - wheat derived - Wholesale - Not Available - feed sample -Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Feed material of cereal grain origin - Wholesale - Not Available - feed sample - Surveillance - Officialsampling - Objective sampling

Feed material of land animal origin - animal fat - Feed mill - Not Available - feed sample -Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Feed material of land animal origin - animal fat - Slaughterhouse - Not Available - feed sample -Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Feed material of land animal origin - blood products - Feed mill - Not Available - feed sample -Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Feed material of land animal origin - blood products - Packing centre - Not Available - feed sample -Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Feed material of land animal origin - bone meal - Feed mill - Not Available - feed sample -Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Feed material of land animal origin - egg powder - Border inspection activities - Not Available - feedsample - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Feed material of land animal origin - egg powder - Feed mill - Not Available - feed sample -Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Feed material of land animal origin - egg powder - Packing centre - Not Available - feed sample -Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Feed material of land animal origin - egg powder - Wholesale - Not Available - feed sample -Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Feed material of land animal origin - Feed mill - Not Available - feed sample - Surveillance - Officialsampling - Objective sampling

Feed material of land animal origin - meat and bone meal - Border inspection activities - NotAvailable - feed sample - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Feed material of land animal origin - meat and bone meal - Feed mill - Not Available - feed sample -Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

batch(food/feed)batch(food/feed)batch(food/feed)batch(food/feed)batch(food/feed)batch(food/feed)batch(food/feed)batch(food/feed)batch(food/feed)batch(food/feed)batch(food/feed)batch(food/feed)batch(food/feed)batch(food/feed)

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

4

10

3

2

2

1

1

2

14

5

3

40

15

4104

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

2

0

117

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella Chichiri


Salmonella

Salmonella InfantisSalmonella AgonaSalmonella AnatumSalmonella BredeneySalmonella CerroSalmonella DerbySalmonella InfantisSalmonella LexingtonSalmonella LivingstoneSalmonella Not typeableSalmonella OhioSalmonella PoonaSalmonella PuttenSalmonella Rissen

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

2

2

0

117171717171717171717171717

80Belgium - 2015


Sampleweight

Sampleweight unit

Totalunitstested



Not Available Feed material of land animal origin - meat and bone meal - Feed mill - Not Available - feed sample -Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Feed material of land animal origin - meat and bone meal - Unspecified - Not Available - feedsample - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Feed material of land animal origin - meat and bone meal - Wholesale - Not Available - feed sample- Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Feed material of land animal origin - Packing centre - Not Available - feed sample - Surveillance -Official sampling - Objective sampling

Feed material of land animal origin - poultry offal meal - Feed mill - Not Available - feed sample -Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Feed material of land animal origin - Processing plant - Not Available - feed sample - Surveillance -Official sampling - Objective sampling

Feed material of land animal origin - protein meal - Feed mill - Not Available - feed sample -Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Feed material of land animal origin - Slaughterhouse - Not Available - feed sample - Surveillance -Official sampling - Objective sampling

Feed material of land animal origin - Unspecified - Not Available - feed sample - Surveillance -Official sampling - Objective sampling

Feed material of land animal origin - Wholesale - Not Available - feed sample - Surveillance - Officialsampling - Objective sampling

Feed material of marine animal origin - fish meal - Feed mill - Not Available - feed sample -Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Feed material of marine animal origin - fish meal - Unspecified - Not Available - feed sample -Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Feed material of oil seed or fruit origin - Farm - Not Available - feed sample - Surveillance - Officialsampling - Objective sampling

Feed material of oil seed or fruit origin - linseed derived - Feed mill - Not Available - feed sample -Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Feed material of oil seed or fruit origin - linseed derived - Unspecified - Not Available - feed sample -Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Feed material of oil seed or fruit origin - linseed derived - Wholesale - Not Available - feed sample -Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Feed material of oil seed or fruit origin - palm kernel derived - Feed mill - Not Available - feedsample - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Feed material of oil seed or fruit origin - rape seed derived - Unspecified - Not Available - feedsample - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

batch(food/feed)

batch(food/feed)batch(food/feed)batch(food/feed)batch(food/feed)batch(food/feed)batch(food/feed)batch(food/feed)batch(food/feed)batch(food/feed)batch(food/feed)batch(food/feed)batch(food/feed)batch(food/feed)batch(food/feed)batch(food/feed)batch(food/feed)batch(food/feed)

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

104

22

11

2

5

1

4

2

6

5

4

1

4

2

4

2

1

1

17

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Salmonella SenftenbergSalmonella spp., unspecifiedSalmonella TennesseeSalmonella TyphimuriumSalmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

171717170

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

81Belgium - 2015


Sampleweight

Sampleweight unit

Totalunitstested



Not Available Feed material of oil seed or fruit origin - rape seed derived - Wholesale - Not Available - feed sample- Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Feed material of oil seed or fruit origin - soya (bean) derived - Conservation facilities - Not Available- feed sample - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Feed material of oil seed or fruit origin - soya (bean) derived - Farm - Not Available - feed sample -Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Feed material of oil seed or fruit origin - soya (bean) derived - Feed mill - Not Available - feedsample - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Feed material of oil seed or fruit origin - soya (bean) derived - Unspecified - Not Available - feedsample - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Feed material of oil seed or fruit origin - soya (bean) derived - Wholesale - Not Available - feedsample - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Feed material of oil seed or fruit origin - sunflower seed derived - Feed mill - Not Available - feedsample - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Feed material of oil seed or fruit origin - Unspecified - Not Available - feed sample - Surveillance -Official sampling - Objective sampling

Feed material of oil seed or fruit origin - Wholesale - Not Available - feed sample - Surveillance -Official sampling - Objective sampling

Pet food - Border inspection activities - Not Available - feed sample - Surveillance - Official sampling- Objective sampling

Pet food - Cutting plant - Not Available - feed sample - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objectivesampling

Pet food - dog snacks (pig ears, chewing bones) - Border inspection activities - Not Available - feedsample - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Pet food - dog snacks (pig ears, chewing bones) - Feed mill - Not Available - feed sample -Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Pet food - dog snacks (pig ears, chewing bones) - Unspecified - Not Available - feed sample -Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Pet food - dog snacks (pig ears, chewing bones) - Wholesale - Not Available - feed sample -Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Pet food - Farm - Not Available - feed sample - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Pet food - Feed mill - Not Available - feed sample - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objectivesampling

Pet food - Unspecified - Not Available - feed sample - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objectivesampling


25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

1

2

6

10

7

6

1

5

1

7

3

34

7

3

2

1

73

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

2

0

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella 4,12:i:-

Salmonella Brandenburg

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella

Salmonella Agona

Salmonella Derby

Salmonella

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

1

0

0

0

2

2

0

82Belgium - 2015


Sampleweight

Sampleweight unit

Totalunitstested



Not Available Pet food - Wholesale - Not Available - feed sample - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objectivesampling

batch(food/feed)

25 Gram 14 1 Salmonella Montevideo 1

83Belgium - 2015

Table SARCOCYSTIS in animal


Totalunitstested




107 Sarcocystis 107

84Belgium - 2015

Table STAPHYLOCOCCAL ENTEROTOXINS in food


Sampleweight

Sampleweight unit

Totalunitstested



Not Available Cheeses made from cows' milk - soft and semi-soft - made from raw or low heat-treated milk -Farm - Not Available - Not Available - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Cheeses made from cows' milk - soft and semi-soft - made from raw or low heat-treated milk -Processing plant - Not Available - Not Available - Surveillance - Official sampling - ObjectivesamplingCheeses made from cows' milk - soft and semi-soft - made from raw or low heat-treated milk -Retail - Not Available - Not Available - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Cheeses made from goats' milk - unspecified - made from raw or low heat-treated milk - Farm - NotAvailable - Not Available - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Cheeses made from goats' milk - unspecified - made from raw or low heat-treated milk - Processingplant - Not Available - Not Available - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Dairy products (excluding cheeses) - butter - made from raw or low heat-treated milk - Farm - NotAvailable - Not Available - Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Dairy products (excluding cheeses) - Hospital or medical care facility - Not Available - Not Available- Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Other processed food products and prepared dishes - pasta - Catering - Not Available - Not Available- Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling


single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

2

7

2

2

6

5

1

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

1

Staphylococcal enterotoxins






Staphylococcal enterotoxins -Enterotoxin A

Staphylococcal enterotoxins -Enterotoxin B

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

1

85Belgium - 2015

Table STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS METICILLIN RESISTANT (MRSA) in animal


Totalunitstested



Not Available Cattle (bovine animals) - calves (under 1 year) - veal calves - Farm - Not Available - animal sample - nasal swab - Monitoring - active - Officialsampling - Objective sampling

Cattle (bovine animals) - dairy cows - Farm - Not Available - animal sample - nasal swab - Monitoring - active - Official sampling - Objectivesampling

Cattle (bovine animals) - meat production animals - Farm - Not Available - animal sample - nasal swab - Monitoring - active - Official sampling -Objective sampling

holding

holding

holding

147

96

104

116

10

16

Methicillin resistantStaphylococcus aureus(MRSA)Methicillin resistantStaphylococcus aureus(MRSA)Methicillin resistantStaphylococcus aureus(MRSA)

116

10

16

86Belgium - 2015

Table TRICHINELLA in animal


Totalunitstested



Not Available Pigs - fattening pigs - raised under controlled housing conditions - Slaughterhouse - Not Available - Not Available - Surveillance - Officialsampling - CensusSolipeds, domestic - Slaughterhouse - Not Available - Not Available - Surveillance - Official sampling - CensusWild boars - wild - Game handling estabilishment - Not Available - Not Available - Surveillance - Official sampling - Census

animal

animalanimal

1191890485406546

0

01

Trichinella

TrichinellaTrichinella spiralis

0

01

87Belgium - 2015

Table YERSINIA in food


Sampleweight

Sampleweight unit

Totalunitstested



Not Available Meat from bovine animals - minced meat - Processing plant - Not Available - Not Available -Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Meat from bovine animals - minced meat - Retail - Not Available - Not Available - Surveillance -Official sampling - Objective sampling

Meat from bovine animals and pig - minced meat - Processing plant - Not Available - Not Available -Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Meat from bovine animals and pig - minced meat - Retail - Not Available - Not Available -Surveillance - Official sampling - Objective sampling

Meat from pig - carcase - Slaughterhouse - Not Available - Not Available - Surveillance - Officialsampling - Objective sampling


Meat from pig - minced meat - Retail - Not Available - Not Available - Surveillance - Officialsampling - Objective sampling

single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)single(food/feed)

single(food/feed)

single(food/feed)

1

1

1

1

600

1

1

Gram

Gram

Gram

Gram

Squarecentimetre

Gram

Gram

4

17

40

7

402

70

67

0

3

9

2

42

16

15

Yersinia enterocoliticaunspecified

Yersinia enterocolitica - biotype1A (not pathogenic)



Biotype 4 - serotype O:3Yersinia enterocolitica - biotype1A (not pathogenic)Yersinia enterocolitica - biotype1A (not pathogenic)Yersinia enterocolitica - biotype1BBiotype 4 - serotype O:3Yersinia enterocolitica - biotype1A (not pathogenic)

0

3

9

2

240

15

1

114

88Belgium - 2015

FOODBORNE OUTBREAKS TABLES

Foodborne Outbreaks: summarized data

Causative agent Food vehicle

Outbreakstrenght

Metrics

Strong Weak

N outbreaks N human casesN

hospitalized N deaths N outbreaks N human casesN

hospitalized N deathsB. cereus enterotoxinsBacillus cereusCampylobacterCampylobacter jejuniClostridium botulinum toxinsEnterotoxin, unspecifiedHistamineNorovirus

SalmonellaSalmonella EnteritidisSalmonella PanamaSalmonella StanleyShigellaStaphylococcal enterotoxinsStaphylococcal enterotoxins -Enterotoxin AStaphylococcal enterotoxins -Enterotoxin DUnknown

Mixed foodMixed foodMilkBroiler meat (Gallus gallus) and products thereofPig meat and products thereofVegetables and juices and other products thereofFish and fish productsPig meat and products thereofBuffet mealsMixed foodBovine meat and products thereofUnknownTurkey meat and products thereofMixed foodMixed foodDrinks, including bottled water

Fish and fish products

Dairy products (other than cheeses)CheeseEggs and egg productsBovine meat and products thereofPig meat and products thereofSheep meat and products thereofOther or mixed red meat and products thereofBroiler meat (Gallus gallus) and products thereofFish and fish productsCrustaceans, shellfish, molluscs and products thereofVegetables and juices and other products thereofCereal products including rice and seeds/pulses (nuts,almonds)Fruit, berries and juices and other products thereofTap water, including well waterBakery productsMixed foodBuffet meals

1 2 0 0 1 71 0 03 10 0 0

1 8 1 01 2 0 0

1 2 2 01 30 0 01 2 2 0

1 8 0 01 21 0 01 2 1 0

1 8 0 01 9 0 0

1 49 0 02 4 0 0

1 4 0 0

1 3 1 0

1 75 0 0

4 10 0 01 2 0 01 2 0 0

30 96 2 07 35 0 04 25 0 0

12 31 1 09 30 0 0

17 83 2 07 19 0 06 53 0 0

4 9 0 0

2 11 0 02 52 5 0

8 27 0 0166 629 17 0

9 90 0 0

89Belgium - 2015

Causative agent Food vehicle

Outbreakstrenght

Metrics

Strong Weak

N outbreaks N human casesN

hospitalized N deaths N outbreaks N human casesN

hospitalized N deathsUnknownVerocytotoxigenic E. coli (VTEC)VTEC O157Yersinia enterocolitica

UnknownUnknownUnknownTurkey meat and products thereof

39 150 0 01 3 3 01 5 5 01 3 0 0

90Belgium - 2015

Strong Foodborne Outbreaks: detailed data

CAUSATIVE AGENT GROUPOUTBREAK STRENGTHCAUSATIVE AGENT GROUPREPORTING YEARCausativeagent

OtherCausativeAgent

FBOnat.code

Outbreaktype Food vehicle

More foodvehicle info

Nature ofevidence Setting

Place oforigin ofproblem

Origin offood vehicle

Contributoryfactors Comment

Metrics

Noutbreaks

Nhumancases

Nhosp.

Ndeaths

NotAvailable

Yes

Strong

NotAvailable

2015

B. cereusenterotoxins

Bacilluscereus

Clostridiumbotulinumtoxins

unknown

unknown

unknown

707

735

776

829

670687

Household /domestickitchen





Mixed food

Mixed food

Mixed food

Mixed food

Pig meat andproducts thereof

N_A

N_A

N_A

N_A

N_A

Detection ofcausativeagent in foodvehicle or itscomponent -Symptomsand onset ofillnesspathognomonic tocausativeagentDetection ofcausativeagent in foodvehicle or itscomponent -Symptomsand onset ofillnesspathognomonic tocausativeagentDetection ofcausativeagent in foodvehicle or itscomponent -Symptomsand onset ofillnesspathognomonic tocausativeagentDetection ofcausativeagent in foodvehicle or itscomponent -Detection ofindistinguishable causativeagent inhumans

Detection ofcausativeagent in foodvehicle or itscomponent -Detection ofindistinguishable causativeagent inhumans

Restaurant orCafe orPub orBar orHotel orCateringservice


Household

Restaurant orCafe orPub orBar orHotel orCateringserviceHousehold

Restaurantor Cafe orPub or Baror Hotel orCateringservice


Take-awayor fast-food outlet


Household

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NOTAVAILABLE

NOTAVAILABLE

NOTAVAILABLE

NOTAVAILABLE

NOTAVAILABLE

N_A

N_A

N_A

N_A

Two individual Botulism type Bcases were grouped.

1 2 0 0

1 2 0 0

1 3 0 0

1 5 0 0

1 2 2 0

91Belgium - 2015


OtherCausativeAgent

FBOnat.code







Metrics

Noutbreaks

Nhumancases

Nhosp.

Ndeaths

NotAvailable

Yes

Strong

NotAvailable

2015

Enterotoxin,unspecified

Histamine

SalmonellaEnteritidis

Salmonella Stanley

Staphylococcalenterotoxins

Staphylococcalenterotoxins -Enterotoxin A

unknown

unknown

unknown

unknown

unknown

unknown

852

757

748

890

658

684

General

Household /domestickitchenHousehold /domestickitchen

General



Vegetables andjuices and otherproducts thereof

Fish and fishproducts

Bovine meatand productsthereof

Turkey meatand productsthereof

Mixed food

Drinks, includingbottled water

N_A

N_A

N_A

N_A

N_A

N_A

Detection ofcausativeagent in foodvehicle or itscomponent -Detection ofindistinguishable causativeagent inhumansDescriptiveepidemiological evidence

Detection ofcausativeagent in foodvehicle or itscomponent -Detection ofindistinguishable causativeagent inhumansDetection ofcausativeagent in foodvehicle or itscomponent -Detection ofindistinguishable causativeagent inhumansDetection ofcausativeagent in foodvehicle or itscomponent -Symptomsand onset ofillnesspathognomonic tocausativeagentDetection ofcausativeagent in foodvehicle or itscomponent -Detection ofindistinguishable causativeagent inhumans

Take-away orfast-foodoutlet

Household

Household

Multipleplacesofexposure in onecountry


Household

Take-awayor fast-food outlet

Retail

Farm (notspecified)

Retail


Retail

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NOTAVAILABLE

NOTAVAILABLE

NOTAVAILABLE

NOTAVAILABLE

NOTAVAILABLE

NOTAVAILABLE

N_A

N_A

N_A

N_A

N_A

N_A

1 30 0 0

1 2 2 0

1 8 0 0

1 49 0 0

1 4 0 0

1 3 1 0

92Belgium - 2015


OtherCausativeAgent

FBOnat.code







Metrics

Noutbreaks

Nhumancases

Nhosp.

Ndeaths

NotAvailable

Yes

Strong

NotAvailable

2015

Staphylococcalenterotoxins -Enterotoxin D

Unknown

unknown

unknown

777

779

822

General

General

General

Fish and fishproducts

Tap water,including wellwaterTap water,including wellwater

N_A

N_A

N_A

Detection ofcausativeagent in foodvehicle or itscomponent -Symptomsand onset ofillnesspathognomonic tocausativeagentDescriptiveepidemiological evidence

Descriptiveepidemiological evidence

Temporarymasscatering(fairs orfestivals)

Camp orpicnic

Household

Retail

Camp orpicnic

Household

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NOTAVAILABLE

NOTAVAILABLE

NOTAVAILABLE

N_A

N_A

N_A

1 75 0 0

1 12 5 0

1 40 0 0

93Belgium - 2015

Weak Foodborne Outbreaks: detailed data

CAUSATIVE AGENT GROUPCAUSATIVE AGENT GROUPOUTBREAK STRENGTHREPORTING YEARCausativeagent

OtherCausativeAgent

FBOnat.code





Origin of foodvehicle


Metrics

Noutbreaks

Nhumancases

Nhosp.

Ndeaths

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NoWeak

2015

B. cereusenterotoxins

Campylobacter

Campylobacterjejuni

Norovirus

Salmonella

Salmonella Panama

Shigella

Unknown

unknown

unknown

unknown

unknown

unknown

unknown

unknown

unknown

639

701

689

743

862

N_A

N_A

819835

628

640

General

General


General

General

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

Mixed food

Milk

Broiler meat(Gallusgallus) andproductsthereofPig meat andproductsthereofBuffet meals

Mixed food

Unknown

Mixed food

Broiler meat(Gallusgallus) andproductsthereofPig meat andproductsthereof

N_A

N_A

N_A

N_A

N_A

N_A

N_A

N_A

N_A

N_A

Unknown

Descriptiveepidemiologicalevidence



Unknown

Unknown

Unknown

DescriptiveepidemiologicalevidenceUnknown

Unknown

Restaurant or Cafeor Pub orBar orHotel orCateringserviceSchool orkindergartenTake-away orfast-foodoutlet

School orkindergartenTemporary masscatering(fairs orfestivals)

Take-away orfast-foodoutletRestaurant or Cafeor Pub orBar orHotel orCateringserviceNotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

Restaurant or Cafeor Pub orBar orHotel orCateringserviceFarm (notspecified)

Take-away orfast-foodoutlet

Retail

Restaurant or Cafeor Pub orBar orHotel orCateringserviceTake-away orfast-foodoutletRestaurant or Cafeor Pub orBar orHotel orCateringserviceunknown

unknown

unknown

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NOTAVAILABLE

NOTAVAILABLE

NOTAVAILABLE

NOTAVAILABLE

NOTAVAILABLE

NOTAVAILABLE

NOTAVAILABLE

NOTAVAILABLE

NOTAVAILABLE

NOTAVAILABLE

N_A

N_A

N_A

N_A

N_A

N_A

N_A

N_A

N_A

N_A

1 71 0 0

1 8 1 0

1 2 0 0

1 8 0 0

1 21 0 0

1 2 1 0

1 9 0 0

2 4 0 0

5 22 0 0

5 28 0 0

94Belgium - 2015


OtherCausativeAgent

FBOnat.code







Metrics

Noutbreaks

Nhumancases

Nhosp.

Ndeaths

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NoWeak

2015

Unknown unknown 653

657

660

662

676

681745751714

740

772

774

788

802

816andothers

NotAvailableNotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailableNotAvailableNotAvailable

NotAvailable

Mixed food

Cerealproductsincluding riceandseeds/pulses(nuts,almonds)Sheep meatand productsthereofDairyproducts(other thancheeses)Fish and fishproducts

Bakeryproducts

Mixed food

Vegetablesand juicesand otherproductsthereofOther ormixed redmeat andproductsthereofBuffet meals

BakeryproductsFruit, berriesand juicesand otherproductsthereofCrustaceans,shellfish,molluscs andproductsthereof

N_A

N_A

N_A

N_A

N_A

N_A

N_A

N_A

N_A

N_A

N_A

N_A

N_A

Unknown

Unknown

Unknown

Unknown



Unknown

Unknown

Unknown

Unknown

Unknown


NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable


NotAvailable

unknown

unknown

unknown

unknown

unknown

unknown

unknown

unknown

unknown

unknown

unknown

unknown

unknown


NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable


NotAvailable

NOTAVAILABLENOTAVAILABLE

NOTAVAILABLE

NOTAVAILABLE

NOTAVAILABLE

NOTAVAILABLE

NOTAVAILABLE

NOTAVAILABLE

NOTAVAILABLE

NOTAVAILABLENOTAVAILABLENOTAVAILABLE

NOTAVAILABLE

N_A

N_A

N_A

N_A

N_A

N_A

N_A

N_A

N_A

N_A

N_A

N_A

N_A

120 361 1 0

2 4 0 0

3 22 0 0

1 2 0 0

2 6 2 0

3 11 0 0

1 2 0 0

3 47 0 0

3 7 1 0

7 69 0 0

5 16 0 0

1 9 0 0

5 12 0 0

95Belgium - 2015


OtherCausativeAgent

FBOnat.code







Metrics

Noutbreaks

Nhumancases

Nhosp.

Ndeaths

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NoWeak

2015

Unknown unknown 851

N_A


Fish and fishproductsDairyproducts(other thancheeses)Cheese

Eggs and eggproductsBovine meatand productsthereof

Pig meat andproductsthereofSheep meatand productsthereofOther ormixed redmeat andproductsthereofBroiler meat(Gallusgallus) andproductsthereofFish and fishproducts

Crustaceans,shellfish,molluscs andproductsthereofVegetablesand juicesand otherproductsthereof

N_A

N_A

N_A

N_A

N_A

N_A

N_A

N_A

N_A

N_A

N_A

N_A

Unknown

Unknown

Unknown

Unknown

DescriptiveenvironmentalevidenceUnknown

Unknown

Descriptiveenvironmentalevidence


Unknown


Unknown




Unknown




NotAvailable

NotAvailable




NotAvailable

NotAvailable

unknown

unknown

unknown

unknown

unknown

unknown

unknown

unknown

unknown

unknown

unknown

unknown

unknown

unknown

unknown

unknown

unknown




NotAvailable

NotAvailable




NotAvailable

NotAvailable




NOTAVAILABLE

NOTAVAILABLE




NOTAVAILABLE

NOTAVAILABLE

N_A

N_A

N_A

N_A

N_A

N_A

N_A

N_A

N_A

N_A

N_A

N_A

N_A

N_A

N_A

N_A

N_A

3 7 0 0

3 8 0 0

1 2 0 0

1 2 0 0

2 12 0 0

28 84 2 0

2 7 0 0

1 3 0 0

3 6 0 0

6 18 0 0

3 6 0 0

1 2 0 0

1 3 0 0

11 67 0 0

2 7 0 0

1 2 0 0

2 4 0 0

96Belgium - 2015


OtherCausativeAgent

FBOnat.code







Metrics

Noutbreaks

Nhumancases

Nhosp.

Ndeaths

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NoWeak

2015

Unknown

VerocytotoxigenicE. coli(VTEC)VTECO157

Yersiniaenterocolitica

unknown

unknown

unknown

unknown

N_A

839

809

720

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

Cerealproductsincluding riceandseeds/pulses(nuts,almonds)Fruit, berriesand juicesand otherproductsthereofMixed food

Buffet meals

Unknown

Unknown

Unknown

Turkey meatand productsthereof

N_A

N_A

N_A

N_A

N_A

N_A

N_A

N_A

Unknown

Unknown


Unknown




NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable


NotAvailableSchool orkindergarten

Unknown

Hospitalor medicalcarefacility

unknown

unknown

unknown

unknown

unknown

unknown

unknown

School orkindergarten

Unknown

Hospitalor medicalcarefacility

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable



NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NOTAVAILABLE

NOTAVAILABLE

NOTAVAILABLE



NOTAVAILABLE

NOTAVAILABLE

N_A

N_A

N_A

N_A

N_A

N_A

N_A

N_A

N_A

N_A

2 5 0 0

1 2 0 0

17 45 2 0

28 221 14 0

2 21 0 0

8 25 0 0

31 125 0 0

1 3 3 0

1 5 5 0

1 3 0 0

97Belgium - 2015

ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE TABLES FOR CAMPYLOBACTER

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Campylobacter jejuni in Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - carcase

Sampling Stage: Slaughterhouse Sampling Type: food sample - neck skin Sampling Context: Monitoring

Sampler: Official sampling Sampling Strategy: Objective sampling Programme Code: AMR MON

Analytical Method: Dilution - sensititre

Country of Origin: Netherlands

Metrics

MIC

AM substance

ECOFFLowest limitHighest limitN of testedisolatesN of resistantisolates

CiprofloxacinErythromycin

(Erythromycin A) Gentamicin Nalidixic acid Streptomycin Tetracycline0.5 4 2 16 4 10.12 1 0.12 1 0.25 0.516 128 16 64 16 64

7 7 7 7 7 7

4 0 0 4 0 3N 0.12

0.250.512481664

1 11 61 2 4

5 51 11 1

3 11

4 3

98Belgium - 2015





Country of Origin: Belgium

Metrics

MIC

AM substance




114 114 114 114 114 114

82 2 1 82 6 66N 0.12

0.250.51248163264128

27 344 72 71 7 45 43

92 55 519 4 21 1 23 1

31 5 2 151 4 3

1 181 59

2

99Belgium - 2015





Country of Origin: Unknown

Metrics

MIC

AM substance




1 1 1 1 1 1

0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.12

0.514

11 1

1 11

100Belgium - 2015





Country of Origin: France

Metrics

MIC

AM substance




10 10 10 10 10 10

7 0 0 7 0 6N 0.12

0.250.512481664

3 172 3 3

8 7 12

14 23

7 6

101Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Campylobacter jejuni in Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - fresh

Sampling Stage: Processing plant Sampling Type: food sample Sampling Context: Monitoring



Country of Origin: Lithuania

Metrics

MIC

AM substance




1 1 1 1 1 1

1 0 0 1 0 1N 0.25

11664

11 1

11 1

102Belgium - 2015






Metrics

MIC

AM substance




5 5 5 5 5 5

4 1 0 4 0 5N 0.12

0.250.512481664128

1 32 1

33 11

122

4 51

103Belgium - 2015






Metrics

MIC

AM substance




94 94 94 94 94 94

70 1 1 70 1 62N 0.12

0.250.51248163264128

23 2860 5

1 5 48 2881 40 4

1 12 41 19 2

34 135 1 7

1 269 51

1

104Belgium - 2015






Metrics

MIC

AM substance




18 18 18 18 18 18

11 0 0 10 0 8N 0.12

0.250.512481664

5 71 11 21 6 8

17 9 21 1 1

56 15 1

10 8

105Belgium - 2015






Metrics

MIC

AM substance




3 3 3 3 3 3

2 0 0 1 0 3N 0.12

0.250.512481664

1 12

12 21

111 1

1 3

106Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Campylobacter jejuni in Meat from pig - carcase

Sampling Stage: Slaughterhouse Sampling Type: food sample - carcase swabs Sampling Context: Monitoring




Metrics

MIC

AM substance




1 1 1 1 1 1

0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.12

0.518

1 11 1

11

107Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Campylobacter jejuni in Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - meat preparation

Sampling Stage: Retail Sampling Type: food sample Sampling Context: Monitoring




Metrics

MIC

AM substance




1 1 1 1 1 1

1 0 0 1 0 1N 0.25

0.51864

11

11

1 1

108Belgium - 2015






Metrics

MIC

AM substance




18 18 18 18 18 18

10 0 0 10 0 6N 0.12

0.250.512481664

7 89 3

1 1 12 1115 2 13 1

66 14 1

10 6

109Belgium - 2015






Metrics

MIC

AM substance




1 1 1 1 1 1

1 0 0 1 0 1N 0.12

0.251864

11

11

1 1

110Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Campylobacter jejuni in Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - fresh - with skin





Metrics

MIC

AM substance




3 3 3 3 3 3

3 0 0 3 0 3N 0.12

0.250.5181664

12

23 1

12

3 3

111Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Campylobacter jejuni in Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - fresh - skinned





Metrics

MIC

AM substance




18 18 18 18 18 18

8 0 0 8 0 9N 0.12

0.250.51248163264

7 83 9 2

1 7 814 9 13 11 7

4 24

28 7

112Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Campylobacter jejuni in Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - carcase - spent hens




Country of Origin: Luxembourg

Metrics

MIC

AM substance




2 2 2 2 2 2

1 0 0 1 0 1N 0.12

0.250.5124864

111 1

2 11

11

1 1

113Belgium - 2015






Metrics

MIC

AM substance




17 17 17 17 17 17

6 1 0 5 1 6N 0.12

0.250.51248163264

10 81 5 3

2 8 111 11 1 5

5 1 11 101 23 1 1

1 15 3

114Belgium - 2015






Metrics

MIC

AM substance




38 38 38 38 38 38

16 0 0 16 0 18N 0.12

0.250.51248163264

19 232 15 61 18 20

34 134 2 1

186 1

10 11

16 17

115Belgium - 2015





Country of Origin: Germany

Metrics

MIC

AM substance




15 15 15 15 15 15

2 0 0 2 0 3N 0.12

0.250.51248163264

10 13 14

4 1211 114

92 4

12

2

116Belgium - 2015






Metrics

MIC

AM substance




20 20 20 20 20 20

10 0 0 11 0 11N 0.12

0.250.51248163264

7 32 13 11 4 7 7

17 11 23 2 1

1 51 28

1 110 10

117Belgium - 2015

ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE TABLES FOR SALMONELLA

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella 1,4,12:i:- in Meat from pig - carcase

Sampling Stage: Slaughterhouse Sampling Type: food sample - carcase swabs Sampling Context: Monitoring - EFSA specifications


Analytical Method: Micromethod dilution (in microtiter plate)


Metrics

MIC

AM substanceECOFFLowest limitHighest limitN of testedisolatesN of resistantisolates

Ampicillin Azithromycin Cefotaxim Ceftazidim Chloramphenicol Ciprofloxacin Colistin Gentamicin Meropenem Nalidixic acid Sulfamethoxazole Tetracycline Tigecycline Trimethoprim8 16 0.5 2 16 0.064 2 2 0.125 16 256 8 1 21 2 0.25 0.5 8 0.015 1 0.5 0.03 4 8 2 0.25 0.25

64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14

12 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 12 12 1 3N 0.015

0.030.060.250.512481632641281024

48 142

14 9 814 10 2 3

1 12 3 21 2 2 1

3 1110 11 31 1

1 312 2 1 12

112

118Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella 1,4,12:i:- in Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - fresh - with skin

Sampling Stage: Slaughterhouse Sampling Type: food sample - neck skin Sampling Context: Monitoring - active

Sampler: Official sampling Sampling Strategy: Objective sampling Programme Code: OTHER AMR MON



Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0N 0.03

0.250.51248641024

2 22 1 2

2 1 11 11

2 22

2 22

119Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella 1,4,12:i:- in Meat from pig

Sampling Stage: Processing plant Sampling Type: food sample - meat Sampling Context: Monitoring - active




Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1N 0.03

0.250.514832641024

1 11 1

1 11

11 1

11 1

1

120Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella 1,4,5,12:i:- in Meat from pig - carcase





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17

15 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 15 13 0 2N 0.015

0.030.060.250.5124832641281024

213 172

17 10 1417 12 6 1

2 17 4 11 4

12 144 16 31 2

15 2 131

15

121Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella 1,4,5,12:i:- in Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - meat preparation





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0N 0.03

0.250.5148641024

1 11 1 1

1 11

11 1

1 11

122Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella 1,4,5,12:i:- in Meat, mixed meat - minced meat

Sampling Stage: Retail Sampling Type: food sample - meat Sampling Context: Monitoring - active




Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0N 0.03

0.250.51248641024

1 11 1

1 1 11

11

1 11

1

123Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella 1,4,5,12:i:- in Other food

Sampling Stage: Unspecified Sampling Type: unknown Sampling Context: Monitoring - EFSA specifications




Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0N 0.03

0.250.5148641024

1 11 1 1

11 1

11 1

1 11

124Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella 1,4,5,12:i:- in Meat from pig





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0N 0.015

0.030.250.5148641024

11

1 1 11 1

11 1

11 1

1

125Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella 3,19:-:- in Compound feedingstuffs, not specified - final product - non-pelleted/meal

Sampling Stage: Farm Sampling Type: feed sample Sampling Context: Control and eradicationprogrammes




Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.03

0.52464<=0.03<=0.25<=0.5<=1<=2<=4<=8

11 1

11

11

11 1

11

11

126Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella 6,7:r:- in Gallus gallus (fowl) - broilers - before slaughter

Sampling Stage: Farm Sampling Type: environmental sample - boot swabs Sampling Context: Control and eradicationprogrammes

Sampler: Official and industry sampling Sampling Strategy: Census Programme Code: AMR MON



Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.5

2464<=0.015<=0.03<=0.25<=0.5<=1<=2<=4<=8

1 11

11

11

11 1

11

11

127Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Abaetetuba in Gallus gallus (fowl) - laying hens - adult





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.5

4128<=0.015<=0.03<=0.25<=0.5<=1<=2<=4<=8

11

11

11 1

1 11 1

11

1

128Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Abony in Meat from pig





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.015

0.030.250.5124864

11

1 11 1 1

1 11

11 1

1

129Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Agona in Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - meat preparation





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0N 0.015

0.030.250.5148641024

11

1 11 1

1 11 1

11 1

1

130Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Agona in Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - meat preparation





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.015

0.030.250.5124864128

22

2 12 2 1 2

2 22

1 21 2

11

131Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Agona in Gallus gallus (fowl) - broilers - before slaughter





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.03

0.5248163264128<=0.015<=0.03<=0.25<=0.5<=1<=2<=4<=8

59 3

7 1095 1

1274

914

14 5 1114 14

7 414

1314

132Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Agona in Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - fresh - with skin





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.015

0.030.250.51248163264128256

104 14

14 6 914 13 5 5

14 10 1 34 14

6 148 12

21481

133Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Agona in Gallus gallus (fowl) - broilers - during rearing period





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.03

0.524128<=0.03<=0.25<=0.5<=2<=4<=8

11 1

1 11

11

11 1

11

1

134Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Agona in Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - carcase - spent hens

Sampling Stage: Slaughterhouse Sampling Type: food sample - meat Sampling Context: Monitoring - active




Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.015

0.030.250.512483264128

21 3

3 2 13 3 1 2

3 33

33 3

111

135Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Agona in Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - carcase - spent hens





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.03

0.250.51248128

1 11 1

1 11 1 1

11

1 11

136Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Brandenburg in Meat from pig - carcase





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0N 0.015

0.030.250.5124864128

23 5

5 2 45 4 1 1

1 3 1 14 2 5 1

2 53 5

41

137Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Brandenburg in Compound feedingstuffs, not specified - final product - non-pelleted/meal





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.03

0.512816128<=0.03<=0.25<=0.5<=2<=4<=8

11

11

11

11

1 11

11

1

138Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Cerro in Other feed material

Sampling Stage: Processing plant Sampling Type: feed sample Sampling Context: Monitoring - active




Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.03

0.060.250.5124864

11

1 11 1 1

11 1

11 1

1

139Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Cerro in Gallus gallus (fowl) - broilers - before slaughter





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0N 0.5

2416>64>1024<=0.03<=0.25<=0.5<=2<=8

1 11

11

11

11 1

1 11

1

140Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Cerro in Compound feedingstuffs, not specified - final product - non-pelleted/meal





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.03

0.524128<=0.03<=0.25<=0.5<=1<=2<=4<=8

11

11

11

1 11 1

11

11

141Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Colindale in Gallus gallus (fowl) - broilers - before slaughter





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.5

2464<=0.015<=0.03<=0.25<=0.5<=2<=4<=8

11 1

11

11

1 11 1

11

1

142Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Derby in Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - carcase





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.015

0.030.250.5124864

11

1 11 1 1

1 11

1 11

1

143Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Derby in Meat from pig - carcase





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

67 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 67

2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 4 3 0 3N 0.015

0.030.120.250.512481632641282561024

2244 671

67 45 667 58 19 58

56 65 9 38 1 611 15 1 64 3

52 58 31 9

6 31 30 3

2524

144Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Derby in Gallus gallus (fowl) - broilers - before slaughter





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7

2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 7 1 0 2N 0.06

0.524816>32>64>128>1024<=0.015<=0.03<=0.25<=0.5<=1<=2<=4<=8

21 2 4

443

12

2 11

76

57 5 1

7 71 7

66

6

145Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Derby in Compound feedingstuffs, not specified - final product - non-pelleted/meal





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.06

0.52464<=0.015<=0.25<=0.5<=1<=2<=4<=8

11

11

11

1 11 1

11

11

146Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Derby in Meat, mixed meat - minced meat





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.015

0.030.250.5124864

11

1 11 1 1

1 11

1 11

1

147Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Derby in Meat, mixed meat - minced meat





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1N 0.03

0.250.514832641024

1 11

1 1 11

11 1

11 1

1

148Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Derby in Other food

Sampling Stage: Unspecified Sampling Type: unknown Sampling Context: Monitoring - EFSA specifications




Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.015

0.030.250.51248128

11

1 1 11 1

1 11

1 11

1

149Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Derby in Meat from pig





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.015

0.030.250.512481632128

11 2

2 22 2 2

1 11 1

2 22 1

111

150Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella enterica, subspecies diarizonae in Meat from goat - carcase

Sampling Stage: Slaughterhouse Sampling Type: food sample - carcase swabs Sampling Context: Monitoring - active




Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.015

0.030.250.512483264

11 2

2 12 2 1 2

2 22

22 2

11

151Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella enterica, subspecies enterica in Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - carcase





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0N 0.06

0.250.512481664

11 1 1

1 11

11

11

1 1 1

152Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella enterica, subspecies enterica in Meat from goat - carcase





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.03

0.250.512483264

1 11

1 1 11 1

11

1 11

1

153Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella enterica, subspecies enterica in Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - meatpreparation





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.03

0.250.5124864

1 11 1 1

11 1 1

11 1

11

154Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella enterica, subspecies enterica in Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - meatpreparation





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0N 0.015

0.030.250.514864

11

1 11 1

1 1 11 1

11 1

155Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella enterica, subspecies enterica in Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - fresh - withskin





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.015

0.030.250.51248163264128

13 4

4 1 24 3 1

3 1 3 13 1 11 2 3

4 1 23

121

156Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella enterica, subspecies enterica in Meat from pig





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0N 0.03

0.250.5124816641281024

11

1 11

11

1 11

1 11

1

157Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Enteritidis in Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - meat preparation





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.015

0.030.250.5124864

11

1 1 11 1

11 1

1 11

1

158Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Enteritidis in Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - meat preparation





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.03

0.250.51248128

1 11 1

1 1 11

11 1

1 11

159Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Enteritidis in Gallus gallus (fowl) - laying hens - before slaughter





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.03

0.52464128<=0.015<=0.03<=0.25<=0.5<=1<=2<=4<=8

11 1

31 4 3

31

34

4 3 34 4

14

44

160Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Enteritidis in Gallus gallus (fowl) - broilers - before slaughter





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9

0 0 0 0 0 1 7 0 0 1 0 0 0 0N 0.03

0.060.51248163264128<=0.015<=0.03<=0.25<=0.5<=1<=2<=4<=8

11

5 31 1 2

7 2 18 71 1

115

1 37

89 4 5

8 72

97

8

161Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Enteritidis in Compound feedingstuffs, not specified - final product - non-pelleted/meal





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.03

0.524128<=0.03<=0.25<=0.5<=2<=4<=8

11

1 11

11

1 11 1

11

1

162Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Enteritidis in Meat, mixed meat - meat products





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.015

0.060.250.5124864

11

1 11 1 1

1 11

1 11

1

163Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Enteritidis in Meat, mixed meat - minced meat





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.03

0.250.52483264

11 1

1 1 1 11 1

11 1

11

164Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Enteritidis in Gallus gallus (fowl) - laying hens - adult





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24

0 0 0 0 0 0 18 0 0 1 0 0 0 0N 0.03

0.060.512483264128<=0.015<=0.03<=0.25<=0.5<=1<=2<=4<=8

83

15 65

22 321 171 1

1 4182

1621

24 9 1824 19

2 32 24

2324

165Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Enteritidis in Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - carcase - spent hens





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14

0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.015

0.030.060.250.512483264128

77 13

114 12 7

14 13 2 710 5 14 4 13

8 5 14 16 14

392

166Belgium - 2015






Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5

0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0N 0.03

0.250.5124864128

4 55 1 1 1

5 5 2 42 1 23 2 5

4 2 41 5

51

167Belgium - 2015






Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.03

0.250.5124864

3 33

3 3 3 33

3 32 21 3 1

3

168Belgium - 2015






Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.03

0.250.5124864

1 11 1

1 1 11 1

11 1

11

169Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Gaminara in Gallus gallus (fowl) - broilers - before slaughter





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.03

0.060.51248163264<=0.015<=0.03<=0.25<=0.5<=1<=2<=4<=8

31

64

8 662

233

57

8 2 88 4

28

88

170Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Give in Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - meat preparation





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.03

0.250.5124864

1 11 1 1

1 11 1

11 1

11

171Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Give in Gallus gallus (fowl) - broilers - before slaughter





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 2

464<=0.015<=0.03<=0.25<=0.5<=1<=2<=4<=8

11

11

11 1 1

1 11

11

1

172Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Give in Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - fresh - with skin





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.03

0.250.5124864128

14 1414 13 13

14 9 1 114 14 5

1412 122 14 2

131

173Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Give in Meat from poultry, unspecified - meat preparation





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.03

0.250.5124864

1 11 1 1

1 11 1

11 1

11

174Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Give in Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - carcase - spent hens




Country of Origin: Luxembourg

Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.03

0.250.5124864

2 22 2 2

22 2 2

22 2

22

175Belgium - 2015






Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.015

0.030.250.5124864

11

1 1 11

1 1 11

1 11

1

176Belgium - 2015






Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5

0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0N 0.015

0.030.250.51248163264128

13 5

5 4 35 5 1 2

4 41 1 4

4 45

11

1 51

177Belgium - 2015






Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.015

0.030.060.250.512483264128

17 91

9 6 89 6 3 1

9 9 39

7 92 9

252

178Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Havana in Meat from pig - carcase





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.03

0.250.5148256

1 11

1 1 1 11 1

1 11 1

1

179Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Havana in Gallus gallus (fowl) - broilers - before slaughter





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.03

0.58256<=0.03<=0.25<=0.5<=1<=2<=4<=8

11

11

11 1

1 11 1

11

1

180Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Havana in Compound feedingstuffs, not specified - final product - non-pelleted/meal





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0N 0.5

281024<=0.015<=0.03<=0.25<=0.5<=1<=2<=4<=8

11

11

11

1 11 1

11

11

181Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Havana in Meat, mixed meat - minced meat





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.015

0.030.250.51248128

11

1 11 1 1

1 11

11 1

1

182Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Havana in Meat from pig





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.03

0.250.51248128

1 11 1

1 1 11 1

11

1 11

183Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Havana in Gallus gallus (fowl) - laying hens - adult





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.5

248128256<=0.015<=0.03<=0.25<=0.5<=1<=2<=4<=8

1 21

11

11

22

2 12 2

2 12

22

184Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Hvittingfoss in Frogs leg

Sampling Stage: Unspecified Sampling Type: food sample - meat Sampling Context: Monitoring - active



Country of Origin: Indonesia

Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.03

0.250.5124864

1 11

1 1 1 11 1

11

1 11

185Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Idikan in Meat from pig - carcase





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.015

0.030.250.5124832

11

11 1 1

1 11

1 1 11

1

186Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Idikan in Gallus gallus (fowl) - laying hens - before slaughter





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.03

2464<=0.03<=0.25<=0.5<=1<=2<=4<=8

11

11

11 1 1

1 11

11

1

187Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Idikan in Gallus gallus (fowl) - laying hens - day-old chicks

Sampling Stage: Farm Sampling Type: environmental sample - delivery box liner Sampling Context: Monitoring - active

Sampler: Industry sampling Sampling Strategy: Objective sampling Programme Code: AMR MON



Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.03

0.524256<=0.03<=0.25<=0.5<=2<=4<=8

11

1 11

11

1 11 1

11

1

188Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Idikan in Gallus gallus (fowl) - laying hens - adult





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.03

0.524128256<=0.03<=0.25<=0.5<=1<=2<=4<=8

22

1 12

11

22 2

2 21 1

22

2

189Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Indiana in Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - meat preparation





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0N 0.03

0.250.51483264

1 11 1

1 1 11 1

11 1

11

190Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Indiana in Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - fresh - with skin





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0N 0.03

0.060.250.5128163264

11

1 11 1

11 1

1 11

11

191Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Infantis in Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - carcase





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0N 0.03

0.250.512481281024

22 2

2 2 2 12 1

1 11 1

2 22

2

192Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Infantis in Meat from pig - carcase





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6

0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 5 5 5 0 5N 0.015

0.030.120.250.512481632641281024

16

46 1

6 6 1 11 6 55 1

1 15 5

15

55 1

5

193Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Infantis in Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - meat preparation





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1N 0.03

0.250.5124832641024

1 11 1

11 1

11 1

11

11

194Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Infantis in Gallus gallus (fowl) - laying hens - before slaughter





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.03

0.524128<=0.03<=0.25<=0.5<=2<=4<=8

11 1

1 11

11

11 1

11

1

195Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Infantis in Gallus gallus (fowl) - broilers - before slaughter





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27

4 0 0 0 0 23 0 0 0 23 23 6 3 4N 0.03

0.060.120.250.5124816>3264>64128>128>1024<=0.015<=0.03<=0.25<=0.5<=1<=2<=4<=8

21

14

1 14 14 143 7 2

14 1 8 3 18 11 7

169

43

4 63 1

2023

226

26 3 627 27

1 1914

418

196Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Infantis in Compound feedingstuffs, not specified - final product - non-pelleted/meal





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.5

24128<=0.015<=0.03<=0.25<=0.5<=1<=2<=4<=8

11

11

11

1 11 1

11

11

197Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Infantis in Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - fresh - with skin





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13

1 1 0 0 0 13 1 0 0 13 13 5 1 4N 0.03

0.120.250.512481632641281024

131

13 4 1 213 7 12 6 7

1 12 1 510 1 6 11 2

12 7 16 1

31 1 5

1313

198Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Infantis in Meat, mixed meat - meat products - cooked, ready-to-eat





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1N 0.03

0.250.514832641281024

11 1

1 11 1

11 1

11

11

199Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Infantis in Gallus gallus (fowl) - laying hens - adult





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.5

2464128256<=0.015<=0.03<=0.25<=0.5<=1<=2<=4<=8

2 32 2

4211

44

4 2 14 4

2 24

44

200Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Infantis in Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - carcase - spent hens





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1N 0.03

0.120.250.512832641281024

11

11 1

1 11

1 11

11

1

201Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Infantis in Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - carcase - spent hens





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0N 0.03

0.250.5128161281024

11

1 1 1 1 11 1

11

11

1

202Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Jerusalem in Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - meat preparation





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.015

0.030.250.5124864

22

2 12 2 1 2

22 2

2 22

2

203Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Kentucky in Meat from pig - carcase





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0N 0.03

0.250.51816641281024

11 1

1 11

1 1 11

1 11

1

204Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Kentucky in Meat from pig





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.015

0.060.250.5124864

11

1 1 11 1

1 11

1 11

1

205Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Livingstone in Meat from pig - carcase





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0N 0.015

0.030.250.51248641281024

12 3

3 23 2 1 2

2 3 1 12

1 32 2

1 2 11

1

206Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Livingstone in Gallus gallus (fowl) - broilers - before slaughter





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8

0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.03

0.5124864128<=0.015<=0.03<=0.25<=0.5<=1<=2<=4<=8

43 8

55 4

4 14 1

44

48

8 58 3

3 38

78

207Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Livingstone in Compound feedingstuffs, not specified - final product - non-pelleted/meal





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.03

0.5464<=0.03<=0.25<=0.5<=1<=2<=4<=8

11

11

11 1

1 11 1

11

1

208Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Livingstone in Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - fresh - with skin





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.03

0.250.5124864

1 11

1 1 1 11 1

11

1 11

209Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Livingstone in Gallus gallus (fowl) - laying hens - adult





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.03

0.120.51248128<=0.03<=0.25<=0.5<=2<=4<=8

21

2 12 1

2 211 1

21

22

21

2

210Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Livingstone in Gallus gallus (fowl) - broilers - during rearing period





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.03

0.52864<=0.015<=0.03<=0.25<=0.5<=1<=2<=4<=8

11 1

12

21

22 1 1

2 21 2

22

2

211Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Livingstone in Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - carcase - spent hens





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.03

0.250.5124864128

2 22

2 2 2 22 2

22 2

211

212Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella London in Meat from pig





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.015

0.030.250.5148128

11

1 11 1 1

1 11 1 1

11

213Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Mbandaka in Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - carcase





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.015

0.030.250.51248128256

11 2

2 12 1 2

2 1 1 11 2

1 11 2 1

11

214Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Mbandaka in Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - meat preparation





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.015

0.030.250.51248128

22

22 2 2

2 22 2

2 22

2

215Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Mbandaka in Gallus gallus (fowl) - broilers - before slaughter





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0N 0.03

0.5124832>3264128>1024<=0.015<=0.03<=0.25<=0.5<=1<=2<=4<=8

12 3

33 2

62

11

152

78

8 6 58 3

5 68

88

216Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Mbandaka in Compound feedingstuffs, not specified - final product - non-pelleted/meal





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.5

464<=0.015<=0.03<=0.25<=0.5<=1<=2<=4<=8

11

11

11 1

1 11 1

11

1

217Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Mbandaka in Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - fresh - with skin





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8

2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.015

0.030.250.512483264128

88

8 4 48 6 2 4

6 6 2 22 8

2 76 8 1

12 5

2

218Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Mbandaka in Meat from poultry, unspecified - carcase





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.015

0.030.250.5124864128

22

2 1 12 1 1

2 12 2

1 1 21 2

11

219Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Mbandaka in Gallus gallus (fowl) - laying hens - adult





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.5

124128<=0.015<=0.03<=0.25<=0.5<=1<=2<=4<=8

1 11

1 12

22

22 1 1

2 11 1

22

2

220Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Mbandaka in Gallus gallus (fowl) - broilers - during rearing period





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0N 0.5

124832128>1024<=0.015<=0.03<=0.25<=0.5<=1<=2<=4<=8

11

111

111

22

2 2 12

2 12

22

221Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Mbandaka in Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - carcase - spent hens





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.015

0.030.250.5124864256

33

3 33 2 3

3 3 13

33 3

21

222Belgium - 2015






Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.03

0.250.51248128

1 11 1

1 1 11 1

11

1 11

223Belgium - 2015






Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.015

0.030.250.51248128

11

1 11 1 1

1 11

11 1

1

224Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Meleagridis in Gallus gallus (fowl) - broilers - before slaughter





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.03

0.52464<=0.03<=0.25<=0.5<=1<=2<=4<=8

11

11

11

1 11 1

11

11

225Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Minnesota in Gallus gallus (fowl) - broilers - before slaughter





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.03

0.060.5124864128<=0.03<=0.25<=0.5<=2<=4<=8

21

2 21

2 11 11

11

12

2 12

22

226Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Montevideo in Meat from pig - carcase





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.015

0.030.250.5124864

11

1 1 11 1

1 11

1 11

1

227Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Montevideo in Compound feedingstuffs, not specified - final product - non-pelleted/meal





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.03

0.512464128<=0.015<=0.03<=0.25<=0.5<=1<=2<=4<=8

11

11 1

211

12

2 1 22 1

1 12

22

228Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Montevideo in Gallus gallus (fowl) - laying hens - adult





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.5

8256<=0.015<=0.03<=0.25<=0.5<=1<=2<=4<=8

1 11

11

11

1 11 1

11

1

229Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Montevideo in Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - carcase - spent hens





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.015

0.030.250.5124864

11

1 1 11 1

1 11

1 11

1

230Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Montevideo in Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - carcase - spent hens





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.015

0.030.250.5124864

11

1 1 11 1

1 11

1 11

1

231Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Not typeable in Gallus gallus (fowl) - broilers - before slaughter





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.5

24128<=0.015<=0.03<=0.25<=0.5<=2<=4<=8

11 1

11

11

1 11 1

11

1

232Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Not typeable in Gallus gallus (fowl) - laying hens - adult





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.12

0.5181632<=0.03<=0.25<=0.5<=1<=2<=8

11

11 1

11

11 1

11

11

233Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Nyborg in Gallus gallus (fowl) - broilers - before slaughter





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5

0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.03

0.512464128<=0.015<=0.03<=0.25<=0.5<=1<=2<=4<=8

12 1

23 31 5 1

14

45

5 3 45 3

1 15

55

234Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Nyborg in Gallus gallus (fowl) - laying hens - adult





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 2

4128<=0.015<=0.03<=0.25<=0.5<=2<=4<=8

1 11

11

11 1 1

1 11

11

235Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Ouakam in Gallus gallus (fowl) - broilers - before slaughter





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N <=0.015

<=0.03<=0.25<=0.5<=1<=2<=4<=8

11

1 1 11 1

1 11 1

11 1

236Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Paratyphi B in Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - carcase





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1N 0.03

0.250.51283264128

11

1 1 11

1 1 11

1 11

1

237Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Paratyphi B in Meat from pig - carcase





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1N 0.03

0.250.5141632641281024

11

1 11 1 1

11 1

11

11

238Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Paratyphi B in Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - meat preparation





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1N 0.03

0.250.5124832641281024

11

1 11 1

11

11 1

11

1

239Belgium - 2015






Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1N 0.03

0.250.512816321281024

11

1 1 11 1

11 1

11

11

240Belgium - 2015






Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1N 0.015

0.030.250.51248321024

11

1 11 1

11 1

1 11

11

241Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Paratyphi B in Gallus gallus (fowl) - broilers - before slaughter





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10

7 0 0 0 0 6 2 0 0 6 4 1 1 9N 0.03

0.060.250.512481632>3264>64128>128>1024<=0.015<=0.03<=0.25<=0.5<=1<=2<=4<=8

21 232 4 11

1 4 17 2 12 1

1 11

93

7 11

64

18

10 510 10

2 41 8

39

242Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Paratyphi B in Meat from poultry, unspecified - meat preparation - intended tobe eaten cooked





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 2N 0.03

0.250.512481632641281024

1 22

2 2 21 1 2

12 1 1

11

21

12

243Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Paratyphi B in Crustaceans





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1N 0.03

0.250.512481632641281024

11

1 1 11

11

11

11

11

244Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Paratyphi B in Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - fresh - with skin





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17

12 1 0 0 2 12 1 3 0 12 9 2 0 16N 0.015

0.030.060.120.250.512481632641281024

31 1711

17 6 7 117 2 14 4

3 3 11 61 1 5 121 11 1 5 3

3 12 11 3 2 2

1 1612 1 1 4 2

1 12 19

245Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Paratyphi B in Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - carcase - spent hens





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1N 0.03

0.250.51481632641281024

11

1 11 1 1

11

11

11

1

246Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Rissen in Meat from pig - carcase





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7

3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3N 0.015

0.030.250.512481632641281024

34 7

7 37 6 1 4

4 5 1 22 3 1

2 64 41 1

33 2 4

35

247Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Rissen in Gallus gallus (fowl) - broilers - before slaughter





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

1 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 1 3 0 1N 0.03

0.250.5128>3264>64>128>1024<=0.03<=0.25<=0.5<=1<=4<=8

12

2 11 1

23

11 2

1 32

13

3 13 2

31

2

248Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Rissen in Other food

Sampling Stage: Unspecified Sampling Type: unknown Sampling Context: Monitoring - active




Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 2N 0.015

0.030.250.51248321024

22

22 2

2 21 2

2 1 22

22

249Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Rissen in Meat from pig





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.03

0.250.514864

1 11 1

1 1 11 1

1 1 11

1

250Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Rissen in Gallus gallus (fowl) - laying hens - adult





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.5

124864128<=0.015<=0.03<=0.25<=0.5<=1<=2<=4<=8

3 31

2 231

22

44

4 1 14 3

2 24

44

251Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Saintpaul in Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - meat preparation





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1N 0.03

0.250.5148163264128

11

1 11 1 1

11

11

1 11

252Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Saintpaul in Meat, mixed meat - meat preparation





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1N 0.03

0.250.512483264128

11 1

1 1 11

11

11 1

11

253Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Saintpaul in Frogs leg




Country of Origin: Vietnam

Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0N 0.03

0.250.512864128

11 1

1 1 1 11

1 11 1

11

254Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Senftenberg in Gallus gallus (fowl) - broilers - before slaughter





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.03

0.512464128<=0.03<=0.25<=0.5<=1<=2<=4<=8

22

11 1

211

22 2

2 11 1

22

2

255Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Senftenberg in Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - fresh - with skin





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.03

0.250.5124832

1 11

1 1 11

1 1 11 1

11

256Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Senftenberg in Gallus gallus (fowl) - laying hens - adult





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.5

12464<=0.015<=0.03<=0.25<=0.5<=2<=4<=8

1 2 21

2 22

22

21

2 12

22

257Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella spp., unspecified in Meat from pig - carcase


Sampler: Official sampling Sampling Strategy: Objective sampling Programme Code: AMR MON pnl2



Metrics

MIC

AM substanceCefotaximesynergy testCeftazidimesynergy testECOFFLowest limitHighest limitN of testedisolatesN of resistantisolates

Cefepime CefotaximCefotaxime +

Clavulanic acid Cefoxitin CeftazidimCeftazidime +

Clavulanic acid Ertapenem Imipenem Meropenem Temocillin

Not Available Not Available Not Available Not Available Not Available Not Available Not Available Not Available Not Available Not Available

Not Available Not Available Not Available Not Available Not Available Not Available Not Available Not Available Not Available Not Available0.125 0.25 0.25 8 0.5 0.5 0.06 0.5 0.125 320.06 0.25 64 0.5 0.25 0.12 2 0.12 0.03 0.532 64 0.06 64 128 128 0.015 16 16 64

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0N 0.015

0.030.060.51241632

11

11

11

11

1 1

258Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella spp., unspecified in Meat from pig - carcase





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20

13 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 12 7 0 4N 0.015

0.030.060.250.512481632641282561024

613 18

219 10 12

19 1 17 8 42 15 3 25 5 13

7 1 1712 1 20 21

413 5 7

1 21

12

259Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella spp., unspecified in Meat from goat - carcase





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.03

0.250.512483264

2 22 2

2 1 22 2 1

22

2 211

260Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella spp., unspecified in Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - meat preparation





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

2 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 2 1 0 0 2N 0.03

0.250.5124832641281024

22 1 1

2 1 21 1

11 11 2 1

22

2 11

261Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella spp., unspecified in Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - meat preparation





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

1 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 2 1 0 0 2N 0.03

0.250.512481632641281024

22 2 2

2 11 2

22

21 1

21

21

262Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella spp., unspecified in Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - fresh - with skin





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11

7 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 10 4 1 0 8N 0.03

0.120.250.512481632641281024

1 111

11 6 810 3 11 2 3

3 1 10 11 1 1 10

6 13 101 1 1

4 87 2 1

104

263Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella spp., unspecified in Meat from poultry, unspecified - carcase





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2N 0.03

0.250.512483264128

22 2

2 2 11

2 22

22

2 12 1

264Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella spp., unspecified in Crustaceans - unspecified





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0N 0.03

0.250.512816128

11 1

1 1 11

1 1 11 1

11

265Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella spp., unspecified in Meat from pig





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 1N 0.03

0.250.514832641024

2 22 1 1

2 2 12

12 2 1

1 12 2

1

266Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella spp., unspecified in Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - carcase - spent hens





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.03

0.250.5124832

1 11 1 1

1 11 1

11

1 11

267Belgium - 2015






Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.015

0.030.250.5124864

11

1 1 11

1 1 11

11 1

1

268Belgium - 2015






Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.03

0.250.5124864

1 11 1 1

1 11 1

11 1

11

269Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Tennessee in Gallus gallus (fowl) - laying hens - adult





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.5

1241664<=0.015<=0.03<=0.25<=0.5<=1<=4<=8

11 1

11

11

11

11

11

1

270Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Thompson in Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - fresh - with skin





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.03

0.250.5124864

1 11

1 1 1 11 1

11

1 11

271Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Thompson in Frogs leg





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.03

0.060.250.51248128

11

11 1 1

1 1 11

1 11

1

272Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Thompson in Frogs leg





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.015

0.030.250.512416128

11

11 1 1 1

1 11

1 11

1

273Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Typhimurium in Meat from pig - carcase





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40

30 0 1 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 19 17 0 10N 0.015

0.030.060.250.512481632641281024

633 381 2

39 15 2139 32 22 9

6 38 7 34 1 2 1 22

21 32 116 1 35 83 1

1 1 10 2 1029 11 15

319

274Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Typhimurium in Gallus gallus (fowl) - broilers - before slaughter


Sampler: Official and industry sampling Sampling Strategy: Census Programme Code: AMR MON pnl2



Metrics

MIC

AM substanceCefotaximesynergy testCeftazidimesynergy testECOFFLowest limitHighest limitN of testedisolatesN of resistantisolates


Clavulanic acid Cefoxitin CeftazidimCeftazidime +

Clavulanic acid Ertapenem Imipenem Meropenem Temocillin

Not Available Not Available Positive/Present Not Available Not Available Not Available Not Available Not Available Not Available Not Available

Not Available Not Available Not Available Not Available Not Available Positive/Present Not Available Not Available Not Available Not Available0.125 0.5 0.5 8 2 2 0.06 1 0.125 320.06 0.25 0.06 0.5 0.25 0.12 0.015 0.12 0.03 0.532 64 64 64 128 128 2 16 16 128

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0N 0.25

2816<=0.015<=0.03<=0.06

1 11 1

1 11

11

1

275Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Typhimurium in Gallus gallus (fowl) - broilers - before slaughter





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11

6 0 1 1 6 1 2 0 0 1 6 5 0 3N 0.03

0.5124>48>81632>3264>64128>128>1024<=0.015<=0.03<=0.25<=0.5<=1<=2<=4<=8

56 1

1 4 14 6

9 2 31

2 11

13 2

31 1 2

6 12 13 1

65

1110 4 7

10 71 3

39

4

276Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Typhimurium in Compound feedingstuffs, not specified - final product - non-pelleted/meal





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.03

416<=0.03<=0.25<=0.5<=1<=2<=4<=8

11

11

1 1 11 1

1 11

11

277Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Typhimurium in Meat, mixed meat - minced meat





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0N 0.015

0.030.250.5148641024

11

1 11 1

1 1 11 1

11

1

278Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Typhimurium in Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - fresh - with skin





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.03

0.060.250.512481664

11

1 11 1

1 11

11 1

11

279Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Typhimurium in Meat from pig





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5

2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 1 1N 0.015

0.030.250.512481632641024

41 5

5 2 35 5 1 1

3 1 14 1 1

5 5 15

21 1

2 1 31

280Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Typhimurium in Turkeys - meat production flocks - before slaughter





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0N 4

>64>1024<=0.015<=0.03<=0.25<=0.5<=1<=4<=8

11 1

11

11 1 1

1 11

11

281Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Typhimurium in Meat, mixed meat - meat preparation - intended to be eatencooked





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0N 0.03

0.250.51416641281024

1 11 1

1 1 11

11

1 11

1

282Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Typhimurium in Meat, mixed meat - minced meat - intended to be eaten raw





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1N 0.03

0.250.514832641024

1 11

1 1 11

11 1

11 1

1

283Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Typhimurium in Gallus gallus (fowl) - laying hens - adult





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.03

0.548128<=0.03<=0.5<=4<=8

11 1 1

1 1 11

11

1 11

1

284Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Typhimurium in Crustaceans - unspecified - cooked





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.015

0.030.250.5124832

11

1 1 11

1 1 11

1 11

1

285Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Typhimurium in Meat from bovine animals - carcase





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.03

0.250.5124864

3 33 1 2

3 2 2 13 1

3 32 31 3

3

286Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Typhimurium in Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - carcase - spent hens





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.03

0.250.5124864

2 22 2

2 2 21 21 2

2 22

2

287Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Typhimurium, monophasic in Gallus gallus (fowl) - broilers - before slaughter





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 0 1N 0.06

0.512481632>32>64>1024<=0.015<=0.03<=0.25<=0.5<=1<=4<=8

11 1

1 11

11

1 21

13 3

32

32 1 2

3 22

21

288Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Typhimurium, monophasic in Compound feedingstuffs, not specified - finalproduct - non-pelleted/meal





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1N 0.03

0.5124>32>64>1024<=0.03<=0.25<=0.5<=4<=8

11

11

11

1 11

11

11

1

289Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Urbana in Frogs leg





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0.015

0.060.250.51248256

11

11 1 1 1

11 1

1 11

1

290Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Salmonella Virchow in Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - fresh - with skin





Metrics

MIC



64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0N 0.03

0.120.250.5124832128

22

2 22 2

2 22 2

22

22

291Belgium - 2015

ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE TABLES FOR INDICATOR ESCHERICHIA COLI

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Escherichia coli, non-pathogenic, unspecified in Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - carcase

Sampling Stage: Processing plant Sampling Type: food sample - meat Sampling Context: Monitoring




MetricsMIC

AMsubstanceCefotaximesynergytestCeftazidimesynergytest

ECOFFLowestlimitHighestlimitN oftestedisolatesN ofresistantisolates

Cefepime Cefotaxim

Cefotaxime +Clavulanic

acid Cefoxitin Ceftazidim

Ceftazidime +Clavulanic

acid Ertapenem Imipenem Meropenem Temocillin

NotAvailable

NotAvailable Not Available

NotAvailable


NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable


NotAvailable


NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

0.125 0.25 0.25 8 0.5 0.5 0.06 0.5 0.125 32

0.06 0.25 0.06 0.5 0.25 0.12 0.015 0.12 0.03 0.5

32 64 64 64 128 128 2 16 16 64

3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

3 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0N 0.016

0.030.060.120.250.5148163264

21 3

22 1

1 11 1

22

2 1 1 21

1 21

292Belgium - 2015






MetricsMIC

AMsubstanceECOFFLowestlimitHighestlimitN oftestedisolatesN ofresistantisolates

Ampicillin Azithromycin Cefotaxim Ceftazidim Chloramphenicol Ciprofloxacin Colistin Gentamicin MeropenemNalidixic

acid Sulfamethoxazole Tetracycline Tigecycline Trimethoprim8 16 0.25 2 16 0.064 2 2 0.125 16 64 8 1 2

1 2 0.25 0.5 8 0.015 1 0.5 0.03 4 8 2 0.25 0.25

64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

2 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 2 2 0 1N 0.015

0.030.250.5124832641281024

12

21 1 1

1 2 11

1 2 11 2

12 2

12

293Belgium - 2015






MetricsMIC



Cefepime Cefotaxim





NotAvailable


NotAvailable


NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable


NotAvailable


NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

0.125 0.25 0.25 8 0.5 0.5 0.06 0.5 0.125 32

0.06 0.25 0.06 0.5 0.25 0.12 0.015 0.12 0.03 0.5

32 64 64 64 128 128 2 16 16 64

35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35

28 35 11 12 35 11 1 0 0 0N 0.015

0.0160.030.060.120.250.51248163264

21912 35

22 17 2 17 1 227 7 133 15 2 73 4 5 3 56 12 7 15 5 5 132 8 4 8 15 3 152 4 1 3 1

4 41 7

294Belgium - 2015






MetricsMIC




1 2 0.25 0.5 8 0.015 1 0.5 0.03 4 8 2 0.25 0.25

64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35

35 1 35 22 15 24 0 3 0 23 26 21 0 14N 0.015

0.030.250.512481632641282561024

1135

11 25 154 20 9 5

1 5 2 31 12 110 5 8 2 4 13 115 29 4 11 18 18 20 5 31 2 1 11 2 1 4 14

35 2 1 2111 23

125

295Belgium - 2015






MetricsMIC



Cefepime Cefotaxim





NotAvailable


NotAvailable


NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable


NotAvailable


NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

0.125 0.25 0.25 8 0.5 0.5 0.06 0.5 0.125 32

0.06 0.25 0.06 0.5 0.25 0.12 0.015 0.12 0.03 0.5

32 64 64 64 128 128 2 16 16 64

5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5

5 5 2 2 5 2 1 1 0 0N 0.015

0.0160.030.060.120.250.51248163264

211 4

21 2 3 1

1 1 1 11

121 2 1 1 1 2

1 2 3 1 32 1

1 1 11

296Belgium - 2015






MetricsMIC




1 2 0.25 0.5 8 0.015 1 0.5 0.03 4 8 2 0.25 0.25

64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5

5 0 5 4 3 4 0 1 0 4 4 4 0 2N 0.015

0.030.120.250.512481632641281024

15

11 4

1 1 21 5 3 1

13 5 1 11 4 2 1 11

2 1 25 1 4

1 34

297Belgium - 2015






MetricsMIC



Cefepime Cefotaxim





NotAvailable


NotAvailable


NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable


NotAvailable


NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

0.125 0.25 0.25 8 0.5 0.5 0.06 0.5 0.125 32

0.06 0.25 0.06 0.5 0.25 0.12 0.015 0.12 0.03 0.5

32 64 64 64 128 128 2 16 16 64

83 83 83 83 83 83 83 83 83 83

78 82 12 19 78 12 5 1 0 0N 0.015

0.0160.030.060.120.250.51248163264

214113 80

2 58 3 33 11 54 5 438 1 2 1 17 38

15 4 16 2 9

16 8 1 4 13 2 1019 17 6 30 10 2 1 328 18 4 30 15 6 276 23 1 6 23 2 14

8 6 66 7 2

298Belgium - 2015






MetricsMIC




1 2 0.25 0.5 8 0.015 1 0.5 0.03 4 8 2 0.25 0.25

64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

83 83 83 83 83 83 83 83 83 83 83 83 83 83

83 6 82 55 34 67 0 4 0 63 75 54 0 63N 0.015

0.030.060.250.512481632641281024

132 821 1

1 13 58 77 8 34 20 1014 11 76 42 5 2

10 9 7 3 7 3 25 138 73 8 6 16 422 47 46 26 2 27 3 2 3 13 9 4 1 1 3 63

83 3 10 2 5015 62

75

299Belgium - 2015






MetricsMIC



Cefepime Cefotaxim





NotAvailable


NotAvailable


NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable


NotAvailable


NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

0.125 0.25 0.25 8 0.5 0.5 0.06 0.5 0.125 32

0.06 0.25 0.06 0.5 0.25 0.12 0.015 0.12 0.03 0.5

32 64 64 64 128 128 2 16 16 64

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0N 0.015

0.030.060.120.25481664

11

11

11

1 11

1

300Belgium - 2015






MetricsMIC




1 2 0.25 0.5 8 0.015 1 0.5 0.03 4 8 2 0.25 0.25

64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1N 0.03

0.514832641281024

11

1 11 1

1 11 1

1 11

1

301Belgium - 2015






MetricsMIC



Cefepime Cefotaxim





NotAvailable


NotAvailable


NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable


NotAvailable


NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

0.125 0.25 0.25 8 0.5 0.5 0.06 0.5 0.125 32

0.06 0.25 0.06 0.5 0.25 0.12 0.015 0.12 0.03 0.5

32 64 64 64 128 128 2 16 16 64

9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9

7 8 2 2 7 2 0 0 0 0N 0.015

0.0160.030.060.120.250.51248163264

252 9

1 61 1 5 51 1 2 4

23

1 1 1 22 4 2 2 1 52 4 2 21 1 2

1 12 1

302Belgium - 2015






MetricsMIC




1 2 0.25 0.5 8 0.015 1 0.5 0.03 4 8 2 0.25 0.25

64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9

8 0 8 4 2 9 0 0 0 6 6 4 0 5N 0.03

0.250.512481632641281024

91 6 8 1

2 5 1 32 7 4

1 2 1 2 46 8 1 11 4 7 3 2

21 5

8 1 41 6

6

303Belgium - 2015


Sampling Stage: Retail Sampling Type: food sample - meat Sampling Context: Monitoring




MetricsMIC



Cefepime Cefotaxim





NotAvailable


NotAvailable


NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable


NotAvailable


NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

0.125 0.25 0.25 8 0.5 0.5 0.06 0.5 0.125 32

0.06 0.25 0.06 0.5 0.25 0.12 0.015 0.12 0.03 0.5

32 64 64 64 128 128 2 16 16 64

10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10

9 10 3 3 8 3 0 0 0 0N 0.016

0.030.060.120.250.512481632

73 10

71 5 32 1 2 7

12 13 1 1 12 2 2 4 2 1 5

3 1 2 1 2 44 3 1

3

304Belgium - 2015






MetricsMIC




1 2 0.25 0.5 8 0.015 1 0.5 0.03 4 8 2 0.25 0.25

64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10

10 0 10 6 1 9 0 1 0 8 8 6 0 7N 0.015

0.030.120.250.5124832641281024

110

23 7 1

2 6 32 1 9 3 2

1 1 48 9 12 6 9 3 1 1

1 1 710 1 6

1 78

305Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Escherichia coli, non-pathogenic, unspecified in Meat from bovine animals - fresh

Sampling Stage: Retail Sampling Type: food sample - meat Sampling Context: Monitoring - EFSAspecifications




MetricsMIC



Cefepime Cefotaxim





NotAvailable


NotAvailable


NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable


NotAvailable


NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

0.125 0.25 0.25 8 0.5 0.5 0.06 0.5 0.125 32

0.06 0.25 0.06 0.5 0.25 0.12 0.015 0.12 0.03 0.5

32 64 64 64 128 128 2 16 16 64

4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

4 4 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 0N 0.015

0.0160.030.060.120.250.5124832

211 4

23

1 2 11 2

11 3 1

1 4 1 12 2

3

306Belgium - 2015



Sampler: Official sampling Sampling Strategy: Objective sampling Programme Code: ESBL MON pnl2



MetricsMIC



Cefepime Cefotaxim





NotAvailable


NotAvailable


NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable


NotAvailable


NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

0.125 0.25 0.25 8 0.5 0.5 0.06 0.5 0.125 32

0.06 0.25 0.06 0.5 0.25 0.12 0.015 0.12 0.03 0.5

32 64 64 64 128 128 2 16 16 64

9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9

8 9 2 2 8 2 0 0 0 0N 0.015

0.0160.030.060.120.250.51248163264

162 9

61 1 6 4

1 51 11 1 1 32 1 1 1 1 12 1 4 3 1 21 2 1 71 2 1

31 1

307Belgium - 2015



Sampler: Official sampling Sampling Strategy: Objective sampling Programme Code: ESBL MON



MetricsMIC




1 2 0.25 0.5 8 0.015 1 0.5 0.03 4 8 2 0.25 0.25

64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13

13 1 13 5 6 7 0 2 0 5 12 9 0 8N 0.015

0.030.120.250.512481632641281024

613

11 8

3 2 5 4 41 2 13 5 1 1

1 2 3 1 46 10 4 64 1 5 3 1 11 2 1

1 813 1 1 1 9

6 4 111

308Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Escherichia coli, non-pathogenic, unspecified in Meat from bovine animals - meatpreparation - intended to be eaten raw





MetricsMIC



Cefepime Cefotaxim





NotAvailable


NotAvailable


NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable


NotAvailable


NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

0.125 0.25 0.25 8 0.5 0.5 0.06 0.5 0.125 32

0.06 0.25 0.06 0.5 0.25 0.12 0.015 0.12 0.03 0.5

32 64 64 64 128 128 2 16 16 64

21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21

17 19 5 5 15 5 0 0 0 0N 0.015

0.0160.030.060.120.250.51248163264

9102 21

1 143 1 11 113 2 1 3 5 101 3 1

1 2 11 3 2 4 24 2 11 3 2 56 4 1 3 5 1 142 4 2 1

5 42 1

309Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Escherichia coli, non-pathogenic, unspecified in Other food of non-animal origin





MetricsMIC



Cefepime Cefotaxim





NotAvailable


NotAvailable


NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable


NotAvailable


NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

0.125 0.25 0.25 8 0.5 0.5 0.06 0.5 0.125 32

0.06 0.25 0.06 0.5 0.25 0.12 0.015 0.12 0.03 0.5

32 64 64 64 128 128 2 16 16 64

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0N 0.015

0.030.060.120.251416

11

11

11

1 1 11

310Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Escherichia coli, non-pathogenic, unspecified in Other food of non-animal origin





MetricsMIC




1 2 0.25 0.5 8 0.015 1 0.5 0.03 4 8 2 0.25 0.25

64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1N 0.015

0.030.2512481632641024

11

11 1

11 1

11

11 1

1

311Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Escherichia coli, non-pathogenic, unspecified in Meat from bovine animals - meatpreparation





MetricsMIC




1 2 0.25 0.5 8 0.015 1 0.5 0.03 4 8 2 0.25 0.25

64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

2 0 2 2 2 2 0 2 0 2 2 1 0 2N 0.03

0.25124832641281024

22

21 1

1 2 11 1 1

1 2 22 1

1 22

312Belgium - 2015






MetricsMIC



Cefepime Cefotaxim





NotAvailable


NotAvailable


NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable


NotAvailable


NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

0.125 0.25 0.25 8 0.5 0.5 0.06 0.5 0.125 32

0.06 0.25 0.06 0.5 0.25 0.12 0.015 0.12 0.03 0.5

32 64 64 64 128 128 2 16 16 64

7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7

7 7 2 2 7 2 1 1 0 0N 0.015

0.0160.030.060.120.250.51248163264

411 6

4 14 1 4

1 1 21

1 11 1 3 2 11 2 1 3 22 1 3 5

22 1 1

2 1

313Belgium - 2015






MetricsMIC




1 2 0.25 0.5 8 0.015 1 0.5 0.03 4 8 2 0.25 0.25

64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5

5 1 5 1 1 4 0 1 0 3 4 2 0 4N 0.015

0.030.250.512481632641281024

15

2 51 12 5 2 11 1 2

1 5 1 13 1 3 2 1

11 4

5 1 1 21 3

4

314Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Escherichia coli, non-pathogenic, unspecified in Cattle (bovine animals) - calves (under 1year)

Sampling Stage: Slaughterhouse Sampling Type: animal sample - caecum Sampling Context: Monitoring - active




MetricsMIC




Clavulanic acid Cefoxitin Ceftazidim Ceftazidime + Clavulanic acid Ertapenem Imipenem Meropenem Temocillin

NotAvailable

NotAvailable Positive/Present

NotAvailable


NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable


NotAvailable

NotAvailable Positive/Present Negative/Absent

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

0.125 0.25 0.25 8 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.06 0.5 0.125 32

0.06 0.25 0.06 0.5 0.25 0.12 0.12 0.015 0.12 0.03 0.5

32 64 64 64 128 128 128 2 16 16 128

6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6

6 6 1 1 6 1 1 0 0 0 0N 0.03

0.250.51248163264>64<=0.015<=0.03<=0.06<=0.12

41 3

11 1 1

12 5 1 1 11 2 52 2 1

112

26

54 3

315Belgium - 2015






MetricsMIC



acid Sulfamethoxazole Tetracycline Tigecycline Trimethoprim8 16 0.25 0.5 16 0.06 2 2 0.125 16 64 8 0.5 2

1 2 0.25 0.5 8 0.015 1 0.5 0.03 4 8 2 0.25 0.25

64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

196 196 196 196 196 196 196 196 196 196 196 196 196 196

113 8 6 7 54 47 4 13 0 43 110 120 0 79N 0.03

0.060.120.250.5124>48>81632>3264>64128>1282561024>1024<=0.015

1524196 35 62

1 2 1 119 1 1525 1 3 6 4 153 118 1 3 4

51 50 3 7 3 8 1

1 76 8 4 334 9 1 1 28 2

5 792 2 9 1 15 25

111 2 9313 15 123 26

13

105132

316Belgium - 2015

MetricsMIC




1 2 0.25 0.5 8 0.015 1 0.5 0.03 4 8 2 0.25 0.25

64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

196 196 196 196 196 196 196 196 196 196 196 196 196 196

113 8 6 7 54 47 4 13 0 43 110 120 0 79N <=0.03

<=0.25<=0.5<=1<=2<=4<=8

196190 160 39

189 604 186

14 71145

134 10

317Belgium - 2015






MetricsMIC



Cefepime Cefotaxim Cefotaxime + Clavulanic acid Cefoxitin Ceftazidim Ceftazidime + Clavulanic acid Ertapenem Imipenem Meropenem Temocillin

NotAvailable


NotAvailable


NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable Not Available Not Available

NotAvailable


NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

0.125 0.25 0.25 0.25 8 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.06 0.5 0.125 32

0.06 0.25 0.06 0.06 0.5 0.25 0.12 0.12 0.015 0.12 0.03 0.5

32 64 64 64 64 128 128 128 2 16 16 128

188 188 188 188 188 188 188 188 188 188 188 188

184 188 10 10 17 172 10 10 0 0 0 0N 0.03

0.060.120.250.51248163264>64<=0.015<=0.03<=0.06<=0.12

6012 3

2 225 2 40 4 983 1 2 14 4 1 55 4 2 1 1 27 1

25 3 1 3 22 43 1 563 10 1 95 36 4 7563 10 53 44 3 9418 37 7 18 142 55 7 4 1

43 225 1

116185

2 154113 16 85

318Belgium - 2015

MetricsMIC




NotAvailable


NotAvailable


NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable


NotAvailable


NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

0.125 0.25 0.25 0.25 8 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.06 0.5 0.125 32

0.06 0.25 0.06 0.06 0.5 0.25 0.12 0.12 0.015 0.12 0.03 0.5

32 64 64 64 64 128 128 128 2 16 16 128

188 188 188 188 188 188 188 188 188 188 188 188

184 188 10 10 17 172 10 10 0 0 0 0N <=0.25 2

319Belgium - 2015






MetricsMIC




1 2 0.25 0.5 8 0.015 1 0.5 0.03 4 8 2 0.25 0.25

64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

188 188 188 188 188 188 188 188 188 188 188 188 188 188

188 19 188 178 99 117 7 46 0 85 149 168 0 125N 0.03

0.060.120.250.5124>48>81632>3264>64128>1282561024>1024<=0.015

32 2222

1 19 24 302 40 86 4 63 37 1 1 14

89 12 30 2 2 7 1170

65 49 23 5 5 2022 48

3 1 6 9 17 16 7 5 1 10 1

23 1242 14 1 6 28

188 11 13916 5 162 78

16

14166

320Belgium - 2015

MetricsMIC




1 2 0.25 0.5 8 0.015 1 0.5 0.03 4 8 2 0.25 0.25

64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

188 188 188 188 188 188 188 188 188 188 188 188 188 188

188 19 188 178 99 117 7 46 0 85 149 168 0 125N <=0.03

<=0.25<=0.5<=1<=2<=4<=8

186160 27

10 42180

12 1974

88 6

321Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Escherichia coli, non-pathogenic, unspecified in Cattle (bovine animals) - meat productionanimals - calves (under 1 year)

Sampling Stage: Farm Sampling Type: animal sample - faeces Sampling Context: Monitoring - active

Sampler: Official sampling Sampling Strategy: Objective sampling Programme Code: OTHER AMR MON pnl2



MetricsMIC




NotAvailable


NotAvailable


NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable


NotAvailable


NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

0.125 0.25 0.25 0.25 8 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.06 0.5 0.125 32

0.06 0.25 0.06 0.06 0.5 0.25 0.12 0.12 0.015 0.12 0.03 0.5

32 64 64 64 64 128 128 128 2 16 16 128

6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6

5 6 1 1 0 6 1 1 0 0 0 0N 0.03

0.250.51248163264<=0.015<=0.03<=0.06<=0.12

21 2

11 1

1 52 1 41 6 21 2

21

46

1 54 4

322Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Escherichia coli, non-pathogenic, unspecified in Cattle (bovine animals) - meat productionanimals - calves (under 1 year)

Sampling Stage: Farm Sampling Type: animal sample - faeces Sampling Context: Monitoring - active




MetricsMIC




1 2 0.25 0.5 8 0.015 1 0.5 0.03 4 8 2 0.25 0.25

64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180

26 2 6 5 19 8 0 9 0 7 45 28 0 19N 0.03

0.060.250.5124>48>81632>3264>64128>1282565121024>1024<=0.015

1212

1 11 811 1 74 14

42 4 4 5 1103 125 8

46 38 2 3 1 1

43 3 1 59

1 423 19

2 20 1126 1 17

7 1 310 6

31434

159

323Belgium - 2015

MetricsMIC




1 2 0.25 0.5 8 0.015 1 0.5 0.03 4 8 2 0.25 0.25

64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180

26 2 6 5 19 8 0 9 0 7 45 28 0 19N <=0.03

<=0.25<=0.5<=1<=2<=4<=8

180174 169 65

175 923 176

15 143171

158 14

324Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Escherichia coli, non-pathogenic, unspecified in Pigs - fattening pigs





MetricsMIC




NotAvailable


NotAvailable


NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable


NotAvailable


NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

0.125 0.25 0.25 0.25 8 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.06 0.5 0.125 32

0.06 0.25 0.06 0.06 0.5 0.25 0.12 0.12 0.015 0.12 0.03 0.5

32 64 64 64 64 128 128 128 2 16 16 128

2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

1 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 0 0 0 0N 0.12

0.25124864<=0.015<=0.03<=0.06<=0.12

11

11 1

1 1 1 11 1 1

12

21

1 1

325Belgium - 2015






MetricsMIC




1 2 0.25 0.5 8 0.015 1 0.5 0.03 4 8 2 0.25 0.25

64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

186 186 186 186 186 186 186 186 186 186 186 186 186 186

66 0 2 2 33 4 0 3 0 3 80 75 0 71N 0.03

0.120.250.5124>481632>3264>64128>1281024>1024<=0.015<=0.03<=0.25<=0.5

201 121 14 62

1 113 1243 1 4 866 125 2 4

15 32 1 2 1

3 44 112 34

1 714 13 12 21

62 536 2 32 1

374

162185

184 172 41184 62

326Belgium - 2015

MetricsMIC




1 2 0.25 0.5 8 0.015 1 0.5 0.03 4 8 2 0.25 0.25

64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

186 186 186 186 186 186 186 186 186 186 186 186 186 186

66 0 2 2 33 4 0 3 0 3 80 75 0 71N <=1

<=2<=4<=8

6 18229 106

181150 16

327Belgium - 2015






MetricsMIC




NotAvailable


NotAvailable


NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable


NotAvailable


NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

0.125 0.25 0.25 0.25 8 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.06 0.5 0.125 32

0.06 0.25 0.06 0.06 0.5 0.25 0.12 0.12 0.015 0.12 0.03 0.5

32 64 64 64 64 128 128 128 2 16 16 128

174 174 174 174 174 174 174 174 174 174 174 174

171 174 11 11 11 161 11 11 5 1 0 0N 0.03

0.060.120.250.512481632>3264>64<=0.015<=0.03<=0.06

259 2

2 14 45 31 10 1 70

14 12 3 3 519 1 3 52 1 132 9 3 28 38 1 774 27 104 27 3 9622 21 3 31 25 2 584 58 1 1 13 2 12

41 1 3 5 1 11

10 3 1 17 4

135172

1 149

328Belgium - 2015

MetricsMIC




NotAvailable


NotAvailable


NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable


NotAvailable


NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

0.125 0.25 0.25 0.25 8 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.06 0.5 0.125 32

0.06 0.25 0.06 0.06 0.5 0.25 0.12 0.12 0.015 0.12 0.03 0.5

32 64 64 64 64 128 128 128 2 16 16 128

174 174 174 174 174 174 174 174 174 174 174 174

171 174 11 11 11 161 11 11 5 1 0 0N <=0.12

<=0.25105 11 98

1

329Belgium - 2015






MetricsMIC




1 2 0.25 0.5 8 0.015 1 0.5 0.03 4 8 2 0.25 0.25

64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

174 174 174 174 174 174 174 174 174 174 174 174 174 174

173 29 174 159 54 50 1 16 0 33 135 100 0 117N 0.03

0.060.250.5124>48>81632>3264>64128>1282561024>1024<=0.015<=0.03

91

141 9 17 262 59 1 86 69 33 2 10

94 25 23 1 2 4137

38 25 10 1 1 719 15

3 3 1 8 15 18 13 3 13 2 1

9 1167 14 2 26

173 14 7112 415 29

24

129115

173

330Belgium - 2015

MetricsMIC




1 2 0.25 0.5 8 0.015 1 0.5 0.03 4 8 2 0.25 0.25

64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

174 174 174 174 174 174 174 174 174 174 174 174 174 174

173 29 174 159 54 50 1 16 0 33 135 100 0 117N <=0.25

<=0.5<=1<=2<=4<=8

157 2515 62

1 17110 70

126117 9

331Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Escherichia coli, non-pathogenic, unspecified in Gallus gallus (fowl) - broilers





MetricsMIC




NotAvailable


NotAvailable


NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable


NotAvailable


NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

0.125 0.25 0.25 0.25 8 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.06 0.5 0.125 32

0.06 0.25 0.06 0.06 0.5 0.25 0.12 0.12 0.015 0.12 0.03 0.5

32 64 64 64 64 128 128 128 2 16 16 128

7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7

6 7 1 1 1 7 1 1 0 0 0 0N 0.06

0.120.250.51248163264<=0.015<=0.03<=0.06<=0.12

112 1 121 3 1

11 2 4 3

1 1 2 2 1 41 2

11

67

65 6

332Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Escherichia coli, non-pathogenic, unspecified in Gallus gallus (fowl) - broilers





MetricsMIC




1 2 0.25 0.5 8 0.015 1 0.5 0.03 4 8 2 0.25 0.25

64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

152 152 152 152 152 152 152 152 152 152 152 152 152 152

115 5 7 7 29 97 0 11 0 94 104 74 0 82N 0.03

0.060.120.250.5124>48>81632>3264>64128>1282565121024>1024

9264716 20 39

3 2 8 66 913 4 819 61 2 2 1 12

24 49 2 10 5 3 1

3 420 9 3 3 233 6 2 12

2 828 13 4 18

115 2 566 34 29 45

21396

333Belgium - 2015

MetricsMIC




1 2 0.25 0.5 8 0.015 1 0.5 0.03 4 8 2 0.25 0.25

64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

152 152 152 152 152 152 152 152 152 152 152 152 152 152

115 5 7 7 29 97 0 11 0 94 104 74 0 82N <=0.015

<=0.03<=0.25<=0.5<=1<=2<=4<=8

44152

145 132 22145 67

1 15217 65

52114 9

334Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Escherichia coli, non-pathogenic, unspecified in Meat from other animal species or notspecified





MetricsMIC



Cefepime Cefotaxim





NotAvailable


NotAvailable


NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable


NotAvailable


NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

0.125 0.25 0.25 8 0.5 0.5 0.06 0.5 0.125 32

0.06 0.25 0.06 0.5 0.25 0.12 0.015 0.12 0.03 0.5

32 64 64 64 128 128 2 16 16 64

3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

2 2 0 1 2 0 1 0 0 0N 0.015

0.030.060.120.250.5248163264

23

1 21 1 1

1 1 1 31 1

1 12

1 1 11

1 11

335Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Escherichia coli, non-pathogenic, unspecified in Meat from other animal species or notspecified





MetricsMIC




1 2 0.25 0.5 8 0.015 1 0.5 0.03 4 8 2 0.25 0.25

64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

2 0 2 1 0 2 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 1N 0.015

0.030.250.512481632641281024

13

1 3 11 2 2 1

1 3 11 2

1 2 1 12 1 2

11 2 1

21

1

336Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Escherichia coli, non-pathogenic, unspecified in Crustaceans




Country of Origin: India

MetricsMIC



Cefepime Cefotaxim





NotAvailable


NotAvailable


NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable


NotAvailable


NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

0.125 0.25 0.25 8 0.5 0.5 0.06 0.5 0.125 32

0.06 0.25 0.06 0.5 0.25 0.12 0.015 0.12 0.03 0.5

32 64 64 64 128 128 2 16 16 64

2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

2 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0N 0.015

0.030.060.120.2524816

21

22 1 1

11 11 2 1 1

12

337Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Escherichia coli, non-pathogenic, unspecified in Crustaceans





MetricsMIC




1 2 0.25 0.5 8 0.015 1 0.5 0.03 4 8 2 0.25 0.25

64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1N 0.03

0.512483264256

11

1 1 11

11 1 1 1

11

1

338Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Escherichia coli, non-pathogenic, unspecified in Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus) - fresh -with skin





MetricsMIC



Cefepime Cefotaxim





NotAvailable


NotAvailable


NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable


NotAvailable


NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

0.125 0.25 0.25 8 0.5 0.5 0.06 0.5 0.125 32

0.06 0.25 0.06 0.5 0.25 0.12 0.015 0.12 0.03 0.5

32 64 64 64 128 128 2 16 16 64

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0N 0.03

0.120.25281664

1 11 1

11

1 11

1

339Belgium - 2015






MetricsMIC




1 2 0.25 0.5 8 0.015 1 0.5 0.03 4 8 2 0.25 0.25

64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0N 0.03

0.250.5148641281024

11

11 1

11 1 1 1

1 11

1

340Belgium - 2015






MetricsMIC



Cefepime Cefotaxim





NotAvailable


NotAvailable


NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable


NotAvailable


NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

0.125 0.25 0.25 8 0.5 0.5 0.06 0.5 0.125 32

0.06 0.25 0.06 0.5 0.25 0.12 0.015 0.12 0.03 0.5

32 64 64 64 128 128 2 16 16 64

39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39

37 38 6 6 38 6 1 1 0 0N 0.015

0.0160.030.060.120.250.51248163264

16155 38

2 30 23 27 18 1

5 1 1 5 196 1 1 13 3 75 2 3 13 5

13 8 2 17 5 1 154 7 3 13 7 3 151 10 5 1 1 4

7 1 11 5 1 1

341Belgium - 2015






MetricsMIC




1 2 0.25 0.5 8 0.015 1 0.5 0.03 4 8 2 0.25 0.25

64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39

37 1 38 16 9 28 0 2 0 28 32 21 1 24N 0.015

0.030.060.120.250.512481632641281024

81 372 1

11 13 30 7

1 1 23 8 41 2 13 1 37 14 31 1 2 9 1 2 16 1 1

22 34 2 1 10 114 14 29 12 1 3 11 1 21 1 1 2 3 24

37 6 1 182 27 1

31

342Belgium - 2015






MetricsMIC



Cefepime Cefotaxim





NotAvailable


NotAvailable


NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable


NotAvailable


NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

0.125 0.25 0.25 8 0.5 0.5 0.06 0.5 0.125 32

0.06 0.25 0.06 0.5 0.25 0.12 0.015 0.12 0.03 0.5

32 64 64 64 128 128 2 16 16 64

10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10

10 10 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0N 0.015

0.0160.030.060.120.250.51248163264

37

1091 7 5

3 41

3 434 3 4 4

1 6 3 64 11 21

343Belgium - 2015






MetricsMIC




1 2 0.25 0.5 8 0.015 1 0.5 0.03 4 8 2 0.25 0.25

64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10

10 0 10 6 3 8 0 0 0 7 8 9 0 5N 0.015

0.030.060.250.512481632641281024

291

1 3 31 3 5

3 9 5 2 21 2 1 2 1

5 10 24 6 6 4 1 11 1 1

1 1 510 1 8

2 68

344Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Escherichia coli, non-pathogenic, unspecified in Crustaceans - unspecified





MetricsMIC




1 2 0.25 0.5 8 0.015 1 0.5 0.03 4 8 2 0.25 0.25

64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0N 0.03

0.250.51248641024

11 1

1 11

11 1 1 1

11

1

345Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Escherichia coli, non-pathogenic, unspecified in Meat from pig - meat preparation





MetricsMIC




1 2 0.25 0.5 8 0.015 1 0.5 0.03 4 8 2 0.25 0.25

64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

4 0 4 3 2 4 0 1 0 4 4 2 0 3N 0.03

0.250.5124832641281024

42 1

1 21 4 2

1 11 4 1 22 2 2 3

1 1 34 2

1 44

346Belgium - 2015






MetricsMIC



Cefepime Cefotaxim





NotAvailable


NotAvailable


NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable


NotAvailable


NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

0.125 0.25 0.25 8 0.5 0.5 0.06 0.5 0.125 32

0.06 0.25 0.06 0.5 0.25 0.12 0.015 0.12 0.03 0.5

32 64 64 64 128 128 2 16 16 64

27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27

25 27 9 9 25 10 1 2 1 1N 0.015

0.0160.030.060.120.250.51248163264128

1626 24

15 2 22 2 12 53 1 5 17

2 1 32 1 2 5 22 2 2 5 3 1 1 27 2 2 10 4 1 1 57 4 2 8 6 2 153 9 3 4 1 31 3 1 1

6 1 51 1 1

347Belgium - 2015






MetricsMIC




1 2 0.25 0.5 8 0.015 1 0.5 0.03 4 8 2 0.25 0.25

64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23

23 2 23 11 2 9 0 1 1 7 20 11 0 15N 0.015

0.030.120.250.512481632641282561024

113 21

11 19 2

1 2 9 4 36 2 23 13 1 3

1 5 1 98 22 1 15 2 112 10 21 3 1 1 11 1

1 2 2 1423 2 1 9

1 6119

348Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Escherichia coli, non-pathogenic, unspecified in Meat from broilers (Gallus gallus)





MetricsMIC




1 2 0.25 0.5 8 0.015 1 0.5 0.03 4 8 2 0.25 0.25

64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1N 0.03

0.514832641281024

11

1 11 1

1 1 11

1 11

1

349Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Escherichia coli, non-pathogenic, unspecified in Meat from bovine animals - minced meat -intended to be eaten raw





MetricsMIC




1 2 0.25 0.5 8 0.015 1 0.5 0.03 4 8 2 0.25 0.25

64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1N 0.03

0.250.5124832641281024

11

1 11

11 1

1 11

11

1

350Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Escherichia coli, non-pathogenic, unspecified in Meat from bovine animals - minced meat -intended to be eaten raw





MetricsMIC




1 2 0.25 0.5 8 0.015 1 0.5 0.03 4 8 2 0.25 0.25

64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20

20 1 18 10 7 5 0 1 0 3 17 13 0 9N 0.015

0.030.060.250.512481632641282565121024

131 201

2 2 14 14 2 9 6 8

1 3 20 7 22 3 3 7

7 15 1 1310 9 11 1 32 2 1

2 1 2 920 1 3 1 13

2 33113

351Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Escherichia coli, non-pathogenic, unspecified in Fish - raw - chilled





MetricsMIC



Cefepime Cefotaxim





NotAvailable


NotAvailable


NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable


NotAvailable


NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

0.125 0.25 0.25 8 0.5 0.5 0.06 0.5 0.125 32

0.06 0.25 0.06 0.5 0.25 0.12 0.015 0.12 0.03 0.5

32 64 64 64 128 128 2 16 16 64

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0N 0.015

0.030.1224832

11

1 11

1 1 11

1

352Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Escherichia coli, non-pathogenic, unspecified in Fish - raw - chilled





MetricsMIC




1 2 0.25 0.5 8 0.015 1 0.5 0.03 4 8 2 0.25 0.25

64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0N 0.03

0.250.512481664128

11

1 11

11 1

1 1 11

11

353Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Escherichia coli, non-pathogenic, unspecified in Meat from pig - fresh





MetricsMIC



Cefepime Cefotaxim





NotAvailable


NotAvailable


NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable


NotAvailable


NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

NotAvailable

0.125 0.25 0.25 8 0.5 0.5 0.06 0.5 0.125 32

0.06 0.25 0.06 0.5 0.25 0.12 0.015 0.12 0.03 0.5

32 64 64 64 128 128 2 16 16 64

16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16

16 16 3 2 16 3 1 3 1 1N 0.015

0.0160.030.060.120.250.51248163264128

834 13

11 22 10 7

3 62 13 6 1 12 3 2 1 1 25 2 1 12 2 2 12 1 2 4 1 131 7 11 1 1

2 21 1

354Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Escherichia coli, non-pathogenic, unspecified in Meat from pig - fresh





MetricsMIC




1 2 0.25 0.5 8 0.015 1 0.5 0.03 4 8 2 0.25 0.25

64 64 4 8 128 8 16 32 16 128 1024 64 8 32

16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16

15 2 16 9 5 10 2 3 0 9 13 10 1 12N 0.015

0.030.060.120.250.512481632641281024

6151

11 10 22 7 4

1 5 14 6 1 21 1 2 63 15 2 1 48 7 10 6 2 12 1 1 1 11 3 1 2 12

15 1 1 1 104 7

13

355Belgium - 2015

OTHER ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE TABLES

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in Cattle (bovine animals) - calves(under 1 year) - veal calves

Sampling Stage: Farm Sampling Type: animal sample - nasal swab Sampling Context: Monitoring - active



Country Of Origin:Belgium

Metrics

MIC

AM SubstancePerformed CCMRSAcharacterisationPerformedMLST MRSAcharacterisationECOFFLowest limitHighest limit

Cefoxitin Chloramphenicol Ciprofloxacin ClindamycinErythromycin

(Erythromycin A) Fusidic acid Gentamicin Kanamycin Linezolid Mupirocin PenicillinQuinupristin/Dalfo

pristin Rifampicin Streptomycin

Not Available Not Available Not Available Not Available Not Available Not Available Not Available Not Available Not Available Not Available Not Available Not Available Not Available Not Available

Not Available Not Available Not Available Not Available Not Available Not Available Not Available Not Available Not Available Not Available Not Available Not Available Not Available Not Available4 16 1 0.25 1 0.5 2 8 4 1 0.12 1 0.03 16

0.5 4 0.25 0.12 0.25 0.5 1 4 1 0.5 0.12 0.5 0.016 416 64 8 4 8 4 16 64 8 256 2 4 0.5 32

N 0.5>0.512>24>48>816>1632>3264>64<=0.016<=0.12<=0.25<=0.5<=1<=4

242

8 2 754 91 1 11

1153 3

115 2 420 83 29 14 3 20

31 11446 21 28 4 550 28

1 3 625

7 132 57

1141

20 2114 114 23

43 252 36 60

356Belgium - 2015

Metrics

MIC

AM substancePerformed CCMRSAcharacterisationPerformedMLST MRSAcharacterisationECOFFLowest limitHighest limit

Sulfamethoxazole Tetracycline Tiamulin Trimethoprim Vancomycin

Not Available Not Available Not Available Not Available Not Available

Not Available Not Available Not Available Not Available Not Available128 1 2 2 264 0.5 0.5 2 1512 16 4 32 16

N 124>4>16>32128>512<=0.5<=1<=2<=64

11

19

115108

211

1 105115

8103

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in Cattle (bovine animals) - calves(under 1 year) - veal calves - CONTINUED





357Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in Cattle (bovine animals) - meatproduction animals - calves (under 1 year)





Metrics

MIC







0.5 4 0.25 0.12 0.25 0.5 1 4 1 0.5 0.12 0.5 0.016 416 64 8 4 8 4 16 64 8 256 2 4 0.5 32

N 0.250.512>24>48>816>1632>3264>64<=0.016<=0.12<=0.25<=0.5<=1<=4

22 1

2 2 31 12 1

151 3

9 12 13 2 2 1 4

6 712 42 5

13

110

165

5 714 14 9

5 43 4 8

358Belgium - 2015

Metrics

MIC





N 1>4>16>32512>512<=0.5<=1<=2<=64

14

1513

13

1216

312

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in Cattle (bovine animals) - meatproduction animals - calves (under 1 year) - CONTINUED





359Belgium - 2015

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in Cattle (bovine animals) - dairy cows





Metrics

MIC







0.5 4 0.25 0.12 0.25 0.5 1 4 1 0.5 0.12 0.5 0.016 416 64 8 4 8 4 16 64 8 256 2 4 0.5 32

N 0.120.250.512>24>48>816>1632>3264>64<=0.016<=0.12<=0.25<=0.5<=1<=4

12

2 12 1 3

1 1 1 7 1 19

1 1 13

3 7 3 1 22 3

5 1 22 1

22

14

94

1 58 9 5

5 32 3 6

360Belgium - 2015

Metrics

MIC





N >4>16>32>512<=0.5<=1<=2<=64

210

91

810

19

Table Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in Cattle (bovine animals) - dairy cows- CONTINUED





Specific monitoring of ESBL-/AmpC-/carbapenemase-producing bacteria and specific monitoring of carbapenemase-producingbacteria, in the absence of isolate detected

No data returned for this view. This might be because the applied filter excludes all data.

Specific monitoring of ESBL-/AmpC-/carbapenemase-producing bacteria and specific monitoring of carbapenemase-producingbacteria, in the absence of isolate detected

No data returned for this view. This might be because the applied filter excludes all data.

Date post:	24-Jun-2020
Category:	Documents
Upload:	others
View:	0 times
Download:	0 times

ZOONOSES MONITORING · covers both zoonoses that are important for the public health in the whole...

Documents