+ All Categories
Home > Documents > zzzzz proLAB Testing · 2020. 12. 9. · zzzzz ML-0043 proLAB Testing TM. TM. 2. The proLAB...

zzzzz proLAB Testing · 2020. 12. 9. · zzzzz ML-0043 proLAB Testing TM. TM. 2. The proLAB...

Date post: 24-Jan-2021
Category:
Upload: others
View: 9 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
14
ML-0043 proLAB Testing TM TM
Transcript
  • zzzzz

    ML-

    00

    43

    proLAB TestingTM

    TM

  • 2

    The proLAB Advantage

    • Full duplication of the Particle Sand Distribution (PSD), clay content, mineralogy, reservoir fluid chemistry, and liner geometry

    • Tailored Sand Control Device (SCD) to specific reservoir conditions

    • Test multiple sand control screens and specifications against our historical database and in-house design software

    • Test multiple flow rates

    • State-of-the-art, industry recognized facility

    • Trust in industry leader in sand control engineering

    Quick and cost-effective testing

    Reliable and repeatable results

    Increased confidence in engineering design and product selection

    Reduce operating costs and extend the life of your well

  • 3

    What Does proLAB Offer?

    RGL’s proLAB offers a three-phase sand control design and testing program (Fig. 1). This program seeks to evaluate SCD designs for PSD variations of a studied field, utilizing improved sand control testing methodologies.

    How Does Industry Benefit from proLAB?Based on the results of RGL’s sand control design and testing program, which considers reservoir complexity and fluid parameters, we confidently design an optimum sand control solution for the well.

    Figure 1: RGL’s sand control design workflow.

  • 4

    proLAB Sand Characterization

    RGL’s proLAB provides services for sand characterization and screen evaluation.

    The main services for sand characterization are:

    • Soxhlet Extraction: This specially modified and equipped unit cleans core samples for characterization in PHASE 1 and sand control evaluation in PHASE 2.

    • Sonic Sifting PSD Analysis: This analysis provides the PSD using the sieving method according to the ASTM standards.

    • Dynamic Image Analysis (DIA): This analysis measures the shape and size of particles using pioneer QICPIC equipment.

    • Coulter Particle Counter: This equipment measures the size of suspended particles down to clay size.

    RGL’s elite technical team is dedicated to analyzing the complexity and fluid parameters of your well to design the optimum sand control solution.

    proLAB staff includes sand control and near wellbore physics experts with diverse industrial and academic background including physical modelling and experimental testing, petroleum geomechanics, rock mechanics and geotechnics.

  • 5

    proLAB Testing OverviewRGL’s elite technical team is dedicated to analyzing the complexity and fluid parameters of your well to design the optimum sand control solution.

    proLAB staff includes sand control and near wellbore physics experts with diverse industrial and academic background including physical modelling and experimental testing, petroleum geomechanics, rock mechanics and geotechnics.

    The following tests are used to examine your well conditions:

    HPHT is used with Standalone Completion Testing to mimic the temperature conditions near wellbore. Temperatures can be adjusted at the sand-trap to simulate flashing across the screen.

    High Pressure/High Temperature

    Near wellbore conditions simulations are used for sand control evaluation. Different types of completions such as standalone screen, gravel-pack, cased and perforated with standalone screen can be used.

    Standalone Completion Testing

    Testing mimics the erosions at well conditions using different sizes of screen coupons. The setup is specifically designed for assessing the erosion resistivity of screen material under different flow rates and particle hardness.

    Screen Erosion Testing

    Large-scale flow loops with real casing and tubing sizes provide a thorough understanding of the flow control device and scab liner’s performance.

    Wellbore Simulation Testing

  • 6

    proLAB Sand Control Evaluation Tests

    Near wellbore conditions simulations are used for sand control evaluation. Different types of completions such as standalone screen, gravel-pack, cased and perforated with standalone screen can be used.

    Standalone Completion Testing

    Linear-flow Sand Control Evaluation (LSCE) testing:

    This setup simulates the near wellbore condition for sand control evaluation purposes. It can simulate different types of completions such as: • Standalone screen (Fig. 2a)• Gravel-pack (Fig. 2b)• Cased and perforated wellbore completed

    with standalone screen (Fig. 2c)

    This large-scale standalone completion testing set-up is a unique equipment for RGL.

    Standalone completion testing simulates both injection and production scenarios under multiphase flow condition. Unlike single-slot coupon experiments, testing the large-scale disk coupons and sand packs helps to minimize the size-related errors. Figure 2(a): Regular standalone completion testing.

    Regular standalone completion testing

    Figure 2(b): Gravel packing standalone completion testing. Figure 2(c): Cased and perforated standalone completion testing.

  • 7

    proLAB Sand Control Evaluation Tests

    High-Pressure and High-Temperature (HP/HT) Testing:

    Conditions could be considered to better simulate the temperature-related near wellbore phenomena (Fig. 2d).

    HPHT is used with Standalone Completion Testing to mimic the temperature conditions near wellbore. Temperatures can be adjusted at the sand-trap to simulate flashing across the screen.

    High Pressure/High Temperature

    Solvent standalone completion testing:

    Solvent injection can be also included in standalone completion testing (Fig. 2e). The solvent is injected along with oil and brine. The temperature at the sand-trap (below the screen), can be adjusted to simulate the flashing across the screen. The solvent assisted in-situ process poses a higher challenge to the SCD due to the potential of solvent flashing in the vicinity of the sand screen.

    Modified standalone completion testing for operations that use solvent involves a modified testing protocol, which allows flow of the mixed bitumen solvent at various rates, desired temperatures up to 90⁰C, and controlled backpressure of up to 1,000 kPa. The drop in the backpressure induces the flashing of the solvent in the vicinity of the SCD.

    Figure 2(d): HT and HP/HT testing.

    Figure 2(e): Solvent standalone completion testing.

  • 8

    proLAB Sand Control Evaluation Tests

    Figure 2(f): Standalone completion testing for injector wells.

    Linear-flow Sand Control Evaluation (LSCE) testing:

    Linear-flow Sand Control Evaluation (LSCE) testing set-up has also been modified to simulate the back-flow conditions in injector wells (Fig. 2f).

    Figure 2(g): Pressure pulsation testing.

    Pressure Pulsation testing:

    Another testing set-up is the pressure pulsation (Fig. 2g), which simulates surging and swabbing in oil wells. The gas, oil, and brine are introduced as pulsations in several multi-phase cycles into the cell, which simulates the near wellbore condition. The pressure pulsation testing has been used mainly to compare the performance of different screens under real cyclic pressure changes across the sand control screen over the well’s production history.

    The development procedure and results of RGL’s standalone completion testing have been prominently published (SPE-190125-MS, SPE-189766-MS, SPE-189539-MS, SPE-189557-MS, SPE-193697-MS, SPE-189769-MS, SPE- 193375-MS, SPE-184999-MS, SPE-182517-MS, and SPE-180756-MS).

  • 9

    proLAB Sand Control Evaluation Tests

    Figure 3: Slurry standalone completion testing rigs.

    This test is designed to simulate the near wellbore condition under radial flow condition. Standalone screen (Fig. 4a), cased, and perforated (Fig. 4b) with standalone screen can be simulated with this facility (Fig. 4). Development of the apparatus and testing results were published previously (SPE-199239-MS).

    Figure 4: Radial-flow sand control evaluation (RSCE) testing rigs.

    In addition to pre-pack standalone completion testing (Fig. 2), slurry standalone completion testing (Fig. 3) is available through proLAB. Dead-end filtration testing is specifically designed to evaluate the plugging tendency and flow performance of the mesh screens under different flow rates, fluid viscosity, solid concentration, and particle size. Development of the apparatus and testing results were published (SPE-198056-MS).

    Figure 4(a): Cased and Perforated standalone

    completion testing.

    Figure 4(b): Standalone completion testing.

    Dead-end Filtration Test:

    Radial-flow Sand Control Evaluation (RSCE) testing:

  • 10

    proLAB Sand Control Evaluation Tests

    High-Pressure/HighTtemperature Radial-flow Sand Control Evaluation:

    Due to the increasing interest of operators working with High-Pressure/High-Temperature (HP/HT) conditions, a new version of the standalone completion test was designed, as shown in Fig. 5, to meet the requirements of thermal projects.

    Figure 5: High-pressure/high-temperature Radial-flow Sand Control Evaluation testing rig.

    10

    Perforation Testing:

    This set-up (Fig. 6) is designed to simulate the possible sanding from the perforations in the semi-consolidated formations. Both production and injection scenarios can be simulated. Different in-situ stresses, flow rates including oil, brine, and gas compositions can be applied.

    Figure 6: Perforation testing rig.

  • 11

    proLAB Sand Control Evaluation Tests

    Wellbore Simulator:

    This setup is designed to simulate tubing deployed devices [such as scab liner completion on the tubing (Fig. 7) and nozzles]. The large-scale flow loop with real casing and tubing size provides a thorough understanding of the performance of the tubing deployed devices. The wellbore simulator is a unique equipment, which was developed through a collaboration with a major operator in Canada (SPE-193366-MS).

    Figure 7: Wellbore simulator rig.

    Large-scale flow loops with real casing and tubing sizes provide a thorough understanding of the flow control device and scab liner’s performance.

    Wellbore Simulation Testing

    11

    Nozzle Testing Rig:

    This testing apparatus (Fig. 8) is designed to test and characterize nozzle geometries used in FCDs through measurement of pressure loss and discharge coefficients. It can also help the operators to compare the performance of the nozzles with standard contraction geometries for empirical modelling. The loop is capable to experiment single- and multi-phase flow scenarios involving liquid, gas, and emulsions. Test results from this flow-loop could be used for quantitative determination of critical parameters for flow convergence, and chocked flow phenomena.

    Figure 8: Nozzle testing rig.

  • 12

    proLAB Sand Control Evaluation Tests

    Figure 9: Screen erosion testing rig.

    Testing mimics the erosions at well conditions using different sizes of screen coupons. The setup is specifically designed for assessing the erosion resistivity of screen material under different flow rates and particle hardness.

    Screen Erosion Testing

    This setup (Fig. 9) is designed to simulate erosion at well condition. Different sizes of screen coupons can be tested in a specifically designed rig for assessing the erosion resistivity of the screen’s material under different flow rates and particle hardness. Tested screen samples are later scanned to measure the eroded surface.

    12

    Bulk Scale Testing:

    The set-up (Fig. 10) is designed to evaluate the scaling on the screens and joints under HPHT condition. Actual produced water along with hydrocarbons can be used. The test cell can handle up to 50 psi @ 177 °C. The cell volume is 75 L with internal height 30 inch and internal diameter of 14 inch. This standard set-up is designed to test 3 ½ inch test coupons of 1 ft length. However, any type of the screen and joints, which could be safely contained in the cell, can be tested by customization of this equipment.

    Figure 10: Bulk scale testing rig.

  • 13

    DOWNLOAD FULL PAPER:

    ABOUT RGLRGL Reservoir Management Inc. (RGL) is an international oil and gas engineering, manufacturing, and service company specializing in sand control and flow control technologies and solutions. Headquartered in Alberta, Canada, RGL operates manufacturing facilities in North America, South America, the United Kingdom, and the Middle East. RGL employs close to 200 people worldwide, with most of its engineering and design professionals stationed in Canada.

    RGL offers a full range of sand control, flow control, and downhole completions tools. Additionally, it offers custom reservoir analysis, testing, tool design, manufacturing, and field services. Today, RGL’s products can be found in wells across the globe, and we’re working hard to grow through research and development, product innovation, and service delivery.

    MISSIONWe integrate technology, engineering, and manufacturing expertise to build value for our customers by understanding their reservoirs and providing the right solutions for long-term performance.

    VISIONTo be the global leader in unlocking the world’s energy resources by providing science-driven sand and flow control solutions.

    CONTACTProduct Information: www.rglinc.com/SandControl

    [email protected]

    https://www.rglinc.com/solutions/sand-control/mailto:solutions%40rglinc.com?subject=I%20need%20more%20Sand%20Control%20information%21

  • UNLOCKINGENERGYWORLDWIDE™

    [email protected] 403.269.8088 rglinc.comwww

    ©Copyright 2020 RGL Reservoir Management Inc - All rights reserved


Recommended