1
“Analysis and Design of an Institutional Waste Water Management Scheme”
R.Ranjon Roy a
,T.R. Sreekrishnan b,B. J. Alappat
c
aM.Tech student, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT, Delhi 110016, India
bProfessor, Department for Biochemical Engineering & Biotechnology, IIT, Delhi 110016, India
cProfessor, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT, Delhi 110016, India
Abstract:
Environmental pollution has become a burning issue in today‟s world. Water is becoming a rare
commodity and many believe that future wars might take place for pure drinking water.
Recycling and recovering of wastewater becomes very important, especially in urban areas. Like
many educational / research institutions, IIT Delhi also generates both domestic and laboratory
wastewaters. Laboratory wastewaters contain different chemicals used in the various laboratories
of the Institute. Presently both kinds of wastewaters are getting mixed up and this mixed waste
water is going to the municipal sewerage system. With a view to treat and recover water from the
sewage, IIT Delhi is planning to separate these two waste waters and construct a STP for its
sewage and another ETP for its laboratory waste water. This paper describes the details of the
analysis carried out recently on the wastewaters and present a design for the STP based on
Sequencing Batch Reactor (SBR) concept.
Keywords: Sewage Treatment Plant (STP); Sequencing Batch Reactor (SBR); Pumping units
1. Introduction
In India, there are lots of research institutes and laboratories. In recent times, institutional waste
water has become a matter of concern because of its potential hazardous effect. A satisfactory
level of study to minimize this problem is yet to be reached because of various limitations. Many
institutes discard their waste water directly to the surroundings as they do not have proper
sewage treatment system.
The raw institutional wastewater contains various toxic organic and inorganic compounds,
chemicals, pathogenic microorganisms etc. If they are released into the environment without any
treatment, our natural water bodies will be severely affected by them. As we cannot deny the
contribution of educational institutes, industries and agricultural practices in our life, we must
find a solution to minimize the pollution. For this, the wastewater must be treated before
releasing into the environment. Sewage treatment is a process that removes unusual
contaminants from wastewater and brings back it to the environment for reuse. The treatment
includes physical, chemical, and biological processes to remove physical, chemical and
biological contaminants. Its objective is to produce a treated effluent and a solid waste (sludge)
which can be reused or discharged into the environment safely. However, the choice of
2
appropriate and effective treatment system is very crucial. The sequencing batch reactor (SBR) is
one of the potential options for treating small and large-scale wastewater. SBR is a fill and draw
system for aerobic and anaerobic wastewater treatment. In this system, wastewater is added to a
single “batch” reactor where it get treated from undesirable components and then discharged to
the environment. Equalization, aeration, and clarification all can be achieved using a single batch
reactor.( Vigneswaran et al., 2007)
The SBR was first introduced by Arden and Lockett in 1914 which was based on active biomass
process (Arden and Lockett., 1914). Fifty years later, in 1970‟s research on SBR began rapidly
with the development of other discontinuous processes (Goroszy et al., 1970). From the current
study we can directly say that now SBR can be used with small and medium size waste water
treatment plants. Due consideration should be given to SBR not only for its economic reasons
but also for its treatment efficiency compared to other treatment processes at present. Apart from
usual advantages, another benefit of SBR that its can easily be adapted for continuous variations
of pollutant concentrations (Irvine and Ketchum., 1998). There are two principal design
conditions in SBR, one is how much supernatant is getting removed during the decanting
scenario and another one is the settle, decant and aeration time (Metcalf and Eddy., 2003).
(Lognathan et al., 2012) carried out study on a batch mode SBR to treat domestic wastewater and
the results showed that effective influent parameters were removed within 6 hr cycle time where
an aeration rate was 6 L/min. The goal of this study is to design a STP to solve the small scale
institutional waste water management problem.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1 Study area
Indian Institute of Technology Delhi is one of the eminent educational institutions in India. This
institute has a good number of laboratories in various departments, residential units, academic
blocks and a number of dormitories for its students. The campus has an area of 320 acres.
Currently, there are two sewer line networks which are being used to collect sewage from
campus using gravitational flow. The location of the STP is near to the Student activity canters
(SAC).Following map (Figure-1) has showed a new sewer line network to collect sewage from
both sump and deliver it to projected STP.
Figure 1: IIT Delhi map
3
2.2 Work plan
The entire work plan is divided into four parts, i) analysis of the wastewater ii) designing of a
pumping station to deliver sewage to the projected STP iii) designing of the STP based on the
characteristics of the sample iv) designing a disposal unit. At present, two sewage sumps are
being used in IIT Delhi to collect the wastewater. One is Jwalamukhi sump which mainly
collects the residential wastewater and another one is Shanimandir sump which collects both
residential and lab wastewater. A horizontal pumping station has been designed to deliver the
sewage. The pumping station includes receiving chamber, coarse screen, and a pump. After
physicochemical characterization of the sewage, a STP was designed with SBR concepts. The
STP includes a receiving chamber, a medium screen, a grit chamber, two SBR basins and a
disinfection chamber. The process flow diagram of the project is placed below (Figure-2)
Figure 2: Process flow diagram of the project
3. Results and Discussion
This chapter deals with the design of the Sequencing Batch Reactor (SBR) at IIT D campus.
3.1 Characteristics of sewage
The waste water sample was collected from both the Jwalamukhi and Shanimondir sump and
pH, BOD, COD, TKN, ammonia nitrogen, TSS, coliform and total phosphorus were measured
according to the APHA (1998) standard method (Table 1). The measured parameters of the two
sampling site did not vary much. To design the STP, higher value of the measured parameters
were considered.
4
Table 1. Characteristics of sewage sample.
3.2 Estimation of sewage generation
The current population of IIT, D has been calculated for the estimation of the total sewage
generation. The hostel resident data was collected from hostel‟s mess section and residential
population data was collected from Delhi voter electoral, 2015. Here, Malviya Nagar locality
numbers (48-53) was considered. These locality numbers only cover the IIT, D area voters and
forty-one percent of the residential population is below 18 years also considered (Census 2011).
Ultimate design period= 30 years
Approximately, present population in IIT, Delhi=12,500.
Assume, after 30 years population will be 16,000 (considering, 30% population will be increase)
The number of population will not increase drastically even after 30 years due to the limited
space of the campus.
Approximate number of Hostel Students = 8500,
Approximate number of residential population =7500
Hostel‟s water consumption = 135 lpcd (CPHEEO Third edition 1999, Manual on Water supply)
Residential water consumption = 172 lpcd (Source: Delhi Jal Board)
Parameter Jwalamukhi
Sewage Sump
Shanimandir
Sewage sump
Expected
Effluent
Design
Value
pH 7.48 7.51 5.5 - 9.0
7.5
BOD, mg/l
177.38 164.21 ≤10
180
COD, mg/l
270 264.43 ≤ 250
270
TKN, mg/l
45.8 45.1 ≤ 5
50
Ammonia nitrogen, mg/l
18.872 19.15 ≤ 50
20
Total suspended solid,
mg/l
790 580 200
790
Coliform, mpn/100ml 1.3 1.3 ≤ 1000
1.3
Total phosphorus, mg/l 7.2 5.5 ≤ 5
8
Oil and Grease, mg/l 5.9 6.2 ≤5 6.2
5
Assume, Sewage generation per day = 80% of supplied water
Total sewage generation from hostels = 8500 × 135 × 0.8 = 9,18000 l/d
Total sewage generation from Residents house =7500 ×172 × 0.8 = 10,32000 l/d
Total amount of sewage genreation = 19,50000 = 1.95 MLD ≈ 2 MLD = 83.33 /hr
Assume a peak factor=3 Hence, Design flow capacity (maximum)= 250 /hr =0.069 /s
3.3 Design of pumping units
A new sewer line network has been illustrated to deliver sewage in projected STP from both the
sumps. The overall pumping design was estimated 1.3MLD and 0.7 MLD for sewage generation
from the shanimandir and jwalamukhi area respectively.
3.3.1 Design of receiving chamber and coarse screen for pumping units
First of all, a rectangular-shaped receiving chamber (Table 2) is designed to collect the sewage
and control its flow. After that sewage is allowed to pass through a coarse screen. A screen is
used to trap the floating matters such as sachets, plastic milk packets, grocery bags etc., which
could disturb the impeller.
Table 2. Detailed design of coarse screen for both Shanimandir and Jwalamukhi sumps.
Design parameter Design Value
(Shanimandir)
Design Value
(Jwalamukhi)
Design flow, /s 0.045 0.024
Size of the receiving chamber, m 2 × 4 × 3 2 × 4 × 2
Number of screen 1 1
Clear opening area for screen, 0.15 0.03
Clear opening between bars, m 0.03 0.03
No. of clear opening, m 3 2
Width of channel for screen, m 0.7 0.6
Depth of channel for screen, m 0.5 0.4
Head loss through screen, m 0.00147 0.0013
Head loss on 50% clogging, m 0.00371 0.0035
6
3.3.2 Designing of pumping system
The pumping station location should select such a way that, it can capable of adequating drained
the entire area. Here, Pumping station (Table 3) with horizontal pumps installed in the dry well
(Figure 3) was considered. The length of the new sewer line networks was calculated through
Google Map. The pumping system was designed according to „NPTEL wastewater management
web courses‟ by Dr. M.M. Ghangrekar.
Table 3. Detailed design of pumping system.
Figure 3. Horizontal pumps installed in the dry well (Shanimandir sumps)
Design Parameter Design Value
(Shanimandir)
Design Value
(jwalamukhi)
Design flow, 0.045 0.024
Diameter of rising tube, m 0.3 0.2
Wet well depth, m 6 5
Wet well diameter, m 3 3
Length of sewer pipe, m 1800 800
HP of motor required for highest
capacity pump, HP
19 , Provide minimum(3+1
stand by) pumps
10, Provide minimum
(2+1 stand by) pumps
7
3.4 Designing of the Sewage treatment plant
3.4.1 Designing of a receiving chamber and a medium screen for STP
A receiving chamber (Table 4) was designed to control flow and seasonal variation of the SBR
tank. The receiving chamber has been designed such way that no biological activity can happen
in it. Apart from receiving chamber, a medium screen has also been included to remove floating
material. Here, a manual medium size bar screen (Figure 4a) has clear openings of 12 mm
considered. A weir has been used above of the screen to control the overflow.
Table 4. Detailed design of Receiving Chamber and Medium Screen for STP
Design parameter Design Value
Design flow, /s 0.069
Size of the receiving chamber, m 2 × 4 × 3 (0.5m for freeboard)
Number of screen in STP 2 (1 is for stand by)
No. of clear opening 3
Width of channel for medium screen, m 0.7
Depth of channel for medium screen, m 0.6
Head loss through screen in normal condition, m 0.0015
Head loss on 50% clogging, m 0.0064
3.4.2 Designing of a Grit Chamber
If inorganic particle will enter in the SBR basin it will affect the treatment process.Moreover it
also prevents damage to the pumps. Here an aerated grit chamber (Figure 4b) has designed. The
design procedure is shown below (Table 5).
Table 5. Detailed design of Grit Chamber for STP.
Design parameter Design Value
Design flow, /s 0.069
Width of Grit chamber, m 3
Depth of Grit chamber, m 2
Assume, Kinematic Viscosity of Effluent, /s 0.0000011
Assume, Particle Diameter, m 0.000150
Settling Velocity Settling Velocity, m/s 0.02
Removal efficiency , cum/sqm/d 1352.07
8
Figure 4 (a). Section view of medium screen ;(b) Grit chamber for STP
3.5 Designing of Sequencing Batch Reactor (SBR)
3.5.1 SBR operating cycle Time
The design procedure of SBR is adopted according to the mass balance. As SBR process depends
more on time rather on space. So, operating cycle time is crucial part in the SBR process.
However, as SBR is a batch reactor, so to achieve a desired amount of treatment, an operator can
shorten or lengthen the operation cycle time. (Table 6)
Table 6. Detailed design of SBR operating cycle time.
SBR Steps Description Design
Time
Static Fill The raw wastewater enters in the SBR tank where no mixing or
aeration is performed.
0.75 hr.
Aerated Fill Both aeration and mechanical mixing are activated in this step.
The aerated filling time will start when the maximum filling time is
completed or top water level is reaches upto the mark.
1.5 hr.
React No additional influent wastewater is added in this step and both
aeration and mixing units are on. Nitrification is also resumed in this
step. In addition to this, the maximum organic matter is also get
reduced in this step.
2 hr.
Settle Aeration is stopped in this phase, that will allow to maintain a static
condition, which will promote settling of the biological flocs.
1 hr.
Decant This step extracts the treated effluent from the SBR basin. When
treated supernatant reaches the bottom water level in the SBR, the
decantation step comes to an end.
0.75 hr.
Idle Waste activated sludge can be extracted in order to attain rapid
settling (if require)
0.00 hr.
Total Total operation cycle time to run one SBR cycle. 6 hr.
9
3.5.2 Dimensions and operating parameters of SBR
Here, two SBR basins (Figure 5) were considered for controlling and maintaining high flows and
seasonal variations. If one basin is obsolete then another basin would continue the process. Apart
from that, if activated sludge is depleted in one basin, then another basin‟s biomass would be
transferred to fix this issue (Ronald F. Poltak et al., 2005). SBR operating parameters and
disinfection chamber (Table 6) were also designed, where MLSS 3500 mg/l and F/M 0.12 were
assumed. Sludge retention time (SRT), Hydraulic retention time (HRT) and sludge production
are main operating parameter.
Table 6. Detailed design of SBR dimensions and operating parameters.
Figure 5: Sequencing Batch Reactor (SBR)
Design Parameter Design value
Flow conditions Peak flow
Number of basins 2
Volume of each basin, 450
Length, m 12
Width, m 7
Bottom Water Level, m 2.75
Maximum Water Level, m 5.5
Depth of the SBR, m
Dimension of disinfection chamber, m
6
4 × 8 × 5
Number of cycles per day per reactor 4
Hydraulic Retention Time, hr 12
Sludge Retention Time, d 16
Sludge Production, kg dry solids/d 136
Total daily sludge volume wasted, /d 11.3
10
3.5.3 SBR aeration requirements
The aeration requirements is the most crucial parameter for SBR design. Maximum cost of the
SBR depends on aeration requirements. The BOD removal and nitrification of TKN were being
used to calculate the total aeration requirements (Table 7). Here, the tubular diffuser was used for
its high efficiency and assumed to be 1m in length. The maximum diffuser elevation 200 mm
above the bottom of the basin is assumed. Furthermore, the number of the diffusers in the basin
were calculated from 10 scfm/ diffuser.
Table 7 SBR aeration requirements
4. Conclusions
The institutional wastewater management problem is the new-born issue. This paper is aimed to
solve wastewater management problem in the educational institute like IIT Delhi. However, the
hazardous waste water coming from laboratory was not considered here. We choose SBR in our
project because it requires less area than other treatment processes and it can be also adopted for
various concentration of waste water. The treated water will be supplied for the gardening and
horticulture in IIT, Delhi campus which will reduce the demands of fresh water. Moreover, the
treated sludge can be use in increasing soil fertility.
References
Ardern,E., Locker,W.T., 1914. Experiments on the oxidation of sewage without the aid of filters. J, SOC.
Chem. Lnd., 33, 10.
APHA., 1998.Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 20th edition. American
Public Health Association, Washington, D.C.
Design parameter Design Value
Aeration time per day each SBR, hr 14
Oxygen for BOD removal, kg O2/kg BOD5 448.8
Oxygen for N Removal, kg O2/kg N 233.96
Actual Oxygen required (AOR) for BOD5, kg O2/d 751.036
Design Water Temperature, °C 30
Total daily SOR, kg O2/d 1779.02
AOR/SOR 0.4
Quantity of air required per basin, scfm 300.3
Design air flow per diffuser, scfm/unit 10
Number of tubular diffusers per SBR 30
11
Dr.M.M. Ghangrekar.,NPTEL wastewater management web courses, Retrieved
fromhttp://nptel.ac.in/syllabus/105105048.
Goronszy, M. S., 1979. Intermittent Operation of the Extended Aeration Process for Small Systems. J.
Water Pollution. Control Fed.51, 274.
Irvine, R. L., Ketchum, L. H., 1998. Sequencing Batch Reactors for Biological Wastewater Treatment.
Crit. Rev. Environ.18, 255.
Locker,W. T., 1954. The evolution of the activated-sludge process. In: Proc. Annual Conf.: The evolution
and the Activated Sludge Process of Sewage Purification in Great Britain.lnst.of Sew.Purif, Blackpool.19.
Metcalf and Eddy., 2003. Waste Water Engineering Treatment and Reuse, 4th edition, Tata McGraw Hill
Publishers.
Ronald F. Poltak .,2005.Sequencing Batch Reactor Design and Operational Considerations, New England
Interstate Water Pollution Control Commission.
R. Lognathan., 2012.Biological Treatment of Domestic Wastewater Using Sequential Batch
Reactor(SBR).Indian Journal of Environmental Protection, vol. 32, No. 7.
Vigneswaran, S., Sundaravadivel, M., and Chaudhary, D. S., 2007. Sequencing Batch reactor: principles,
design/operation, case study, Encyclopedia of life sciences eolss.