19.11.2019 - Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEETIN THE MAHARASHTRA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL,

AURANGABAD BENCH, AURANGABADORIGINAL APPLICATION NO. 434 OF 2019

(Shri Namdeo S. Ghone V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------OFFICE ORDER TRIBUNAL’S ORDERS

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------CORAM : B. P. PATIL, ACTING CHAIRMANDATE : 19.11.2019ORAL ORDER :

Heard Shri S.D. Dhongde, learned Advocate for

the applicant and Smt. Deepali S. Deshpande, learned

Presenting Officer for the respondents.

2. At the request of learned Advocate for the

applicant, S.O. to 07.01.2020.

ACTING CHAIRMANKPB ORAL ORDERS 19.11.2019



(Shri Ashok G. Puri V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------OFFICE ORDER TRIBUNAL’S ORDERS


Heard Shri S.D. Dhongde, learned Advocate

holding for Smt. Suchita A. Dhongde, learned Advocate

for the applicant and Smt. Deepali S. Deshpande,

learned Presenting Officer for the respondent Nos. 1, 4,

5 & 6. Shri Shamsunder B. Patil, learned Advocate for

respondent No. 2 and 3 (Absent).

2. Learned Presenting Officer has filed affidavit in

reply on behalf of respondent No. 5. Same is taken on

record and copy thereof has been served on the other

side.

3. No affidavit in reply is filed by the respondent

Nos. 1 to 4 & 6.

4. S.O. to 17.12.2019.



AURANGABAD BENCH, AURANGABADM.A. No. 247/2019 in O.A. St. No. 02/2019

(Shri Tukaram K. Kalaskar V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------OFFICE ORDER TRIBUNAL’S ORDERS


Heard Shri Ganesh Jadhav, learned Advocate

holding for Shri O.B. Boinwad, learned Advocate for

the applicant, Shri M.S. Mahajan, learned Chief

Presenting Officer for the respondent Nos. 1 & 2 and

Shri S.D. Dhongde, learned Advocate for respondent

No. 3.

2. Learned Advocate for respondent No. 3 seeks

time for filing affidavit in reply.

3. On perusal of the record, it reveals that already

last chance was given to the respondent No. 3 for filing

affidavit in reply. But he has failed to file affidavit in

reply in time. There is no just ground to grant further

time. However, in the interest of justice, short time is

granted to the respondent No. 3 for filing affidavit in

reply subject to payment of costs of Rs. 5,000/- (Rs.

Five Thousand Only). The amount of costs shall be

deposited in the registry of this Tribunal.

4. S.O. to 17.12.2019.




(Smt. Shashikala G. Gaikwad V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------OFFICE ORDER TRIBUNAL’S ORDERS



holding for Smt. Suchita A. Dhongde, learned Advocate

for the applicant and Shri B.S. Deokar, learned







(Shri Subhash H. Puri V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------OFFICE ORDER TRIBUNAL’S ORDERS


Heard Shri A.D. Gadekar, learned Advocate for

the applicant and Smt. Priya R. Bharaswadkar,

learned Presenting Officer for the respondents.


reply on behalf of respondent No. 2 in M.A. Same is

taken on record and copy thereof has been served on

the other side.

3. S.O. to 02.01.2020.




(Dr. Pandharinath S. Gawali and Ors. V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------OFFICE ORDER TRIBUNAL’S ORDERS


Heard Shri S.G. Kulknarni, learned Advocate

holding for Shri Ajay Deshpande, learned Advocate for

the applicant and Shri B.S. Deokar, learned Presenting

Officer for the respondents.





AURANGABAD BENCH, AURANGABADM.A. No. 142/2019 in O.A. St. No. 591/2019(Shri Bhau M. Khade V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------OFFICE ORDER TRIBUNAL’S ORDERS


Heard Shri S.G. Kulkarni, learned Advocate

holding for Shri R.N. Bharaswadkar, learned Advocate

for the applicant and Shri M.P. Gude, learned







(Shri Purushottam N. Patil V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------OFFICE ORDER TRIBUNAL’S ORDERS


Heard Shri P.D. Bodade, learned Advocate

holding for Shri J.B. Choudhary, learned Advocate for

the applicant and Smt. M.S. Patni, learned Presenting


2. Learned Advocate for the applicant has filed

rejoinder affidavit to the affidavit in reply filed by the

respondent Nos. 1 to 5. Same is taken on record and

copy thereof has been served on the other side.

3. S.O. to 10.01.2020.




(Shri Manohar K. Mulmule and Ors. V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------OFFICE ORDER TRIBUNAL’S ORDERS


Heard Shri S.G. Kulknarni, learned Advocate

holding for Shri Ajay Deshpande, learned Advocate for

the applicant and Shri M.S. Mahajan, learned Chief


2. Learned Chief Presenting Officer seeks time for

filing affidavit in reply on behalf of respondents. Time

granted.

3. S.O. to 18.12.2019.




(Shri Mirza Saleem Bai Ismail Baig V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------OFFICE ORDER TRIBUNAL’S ORDERS


Heard Shri K.B. Jadhav, learned Advocate for the

applicant and Shri V.R. Bhumkar, learned Presenting


2. Learned Presenting Officer seeks time for filing

affidavit in reply on behalf of respondents in M.A. Time

granted.

3. S.O. to 06.01.2020.




(Shri Laxman H. Talekar V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------OFFICE ORDER TRIBUNAL’S ORDERS



applicant and Shri D.R. Patil, learned Presenting



affidavit in reply on behalf of respondents in M.A. Time

granted.

3. S.O. to 06.01.2020.




(Shri Sachin V. Tonde V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------OFFICE ORDER TRIBUNAL’S ORDERS



applicant, Shri N.U. Yadav, learned Presenting Officer

for the respondent Nos. 1 & 2 and Shri Ashish Rajkar,

learned Advocate for respondent No. 3.

2. At the request of learned Presenting Officer, S.O.

to 05.12.2019 for production of original record.




(Shri Ranjeet S. Salve (Dhangar)V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------OFFICE ORDER TRIBUNAL’S ORDERS






reply on behalf of respondent No. 2. Same is taken on

record and copy thereof has been served on the other

side.

3. S.O. to 02.01.2020.




(Shri Narayan D. Bamnath V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------OFFICE ORDER TRIBUNAL’S ORDERS



applicant and Smt. Priya R. Bharaswadkar, learned


2. Learned Advocate for the applicant has submitted

that during pendency of the present O.A., the applicant has

filed representation / appeal with the Divisional

Commissioner, Aurangabad Division, Aurangabad

challenging the impugned suspension order and the same

is pending. He has submitted that the respondent No. 2

may be directed to decide the said representation/appeal

within in a stipulated time and with that direction, the

present O.A. may be disposed of.

3. Learned Presenting Officer has submitted that the

reasonable time may be given to the respondents to decide

the representation/appeal.

4. In view of the submissions advanced by the learned

Advocate for the applicant, the Original Application is

disposed of with a direction to the respondent No. 2 to

decide the representation/appeal made by the applicant

within a period of two months from the date of this order

and communicate the decision therein to the applicant in

writing. There shall be no order as to costs.




(Shri Raviraj R. Darak V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------OFFICE ORDER TRIBUNAL’S ORDERS


Heard Shri Vivek Bhavtankar, learned Advocate

for the applicant and Shri I.S. Thorat, learned


2. Issue notices to the respondents, returnable on

02.01.2020.

3. Tribunal may take the case for final disposal at

once and separate notice for final disposal shall not be

issued.

4. Applicant is authorized and directed to serve on

respondent/s intimation/notice of date of hearing duly

authenticated by Registry, along with complete paper

book of the case. Respondents are put to notice that

the case would be taken up for final disposal at the

stage of admission hearing.

5. This intimation/notice is ordered under Rule

11 of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal

(Procedure) Rules, 1988, and the questions such as

limitation and alternate remedy are kept open.

6. The service may be done by hand delivery, speed

post, courier and acknowledgment be obtained

//2// O.A. No. 989/2019

and produced along with affidavit of compliance in

the Registry before due date. Applicant is directed to

file affidavit of compliance and notice.

7. If notice is not collected within 7 days or proof of

service is not produced before 3 days of the next date,

case shall automatically stand dismissed without

further reference to the Tribunal.

8. S.O. to 02.01.2020.

9. Steno copy and Hamdast is allowed to both

parties.




(Shri Raviraj R. Boralkar V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------OFFICE ORDER TRIBUNAL’S ORDERS


Shri D.T. Devane, learned Advocate for the

applicant (Leave Note).

Heard Shri N.U. Yadav, learned Presenting


2. In view of leave note filed by learned Advocate for

the applicant, S.O. to 03.01.2020.




(Shri Vitthal S. Lokhande V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------OFFICE ORDER TRIBUNAL’S ORDERS


Heard Shri V.B. Wagh, learned Advocate for the

applicant and Smt. Priya R. Bharaswadkar, learned



03.01.2020.



issued.













//2// O.A. No. 1011/2019








8. S.O. to 03.01.2020.


parties.




(Shri Satish N. Badade V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------OFFICE ORDER TRIBUNAL’S ORDERS


Heard Shri A.D. Sugdare, learned Advocate for

the applicant and Shri D.R. Patil, learned Presenting


2. By filing the present O.A., the applicant has

challenged the Pay Fixation. The subject matter of pay

fixation is dealt with by the Division Bench.

3. Hence, the present O.A. is removed from the

board. The Registry is directed to place the matter

before the appropriate Bench.




(Shri Walimi L. Kande V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------OFFICE ORDER TRIBUNAL’S ORDERS


Heard Shri A.S. Deshmukh, learned Advocate for

the applicant and Smt. Sanjivani K. Deshmukh-Ghate,


2. At the request of learned Presenting Officer for

the respondents, S.O. to 05.12.2019.




(Shri Murlidhar E. Sakhare and Ors. V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------OFFICE ORDER TRIBUNAL’S ORDERS



holding for Shri R.P. Bhumkar, learned Advocate for




affidavit in reply on behalf of respondents. Time

granted as a last chance.

3. S.O. to 11.12.2019.




(Shri Sakharam P. Ranbhavle V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------OFFICE ORDER TRIBUNAL’S ORDERS



applicant and Shri M.S. Mahajan, learned Chief


2. The applicant has challenged the order dated

06.11.2019 relieving him from the establishment of

Police Training Centre, Jalna on 20.11.2019.

3. Learned Advocate for the applicant has

submitted that the applicant has been transferred on

the establishment of Police Training Centre, Jalna in

the year 2014 and he has been appointed by the

respondent No. 7. He has submitted that without any

reason, the respondent No. 6 issued the order dated

06.11.2019 and directed to relieve him on 20.11.2019.

He has submitted that the impugned order is not legal

one and therefore, he has prayed to grant interim relief

in favour of the applicant.

4. Learned C.P.O. has submitted that the applicant

has been deputed on the establishment of Police

Training Centre, Jalna in the year 2014 and after

completion of his deputation period, he has been

directed to relieve. He has submitted that there is no

//2// O.A. No. 1015/2019

illegality in the impugned order and therefore, he

supported the same.

5. On perusal of the record, it reveals that the

applicant has been appointed by the respondent No. 7

on his establishment by the appointment order dated

11.10.2007 and accordingly he joined the

establishment of respondent No. 7. By the order dated

12.11.2014 and as per the approval given by the

Special Inspector General of Police, State Reserve

Police Force, Nagpur, the applicant has been deputed

on the establishment of respondent No. 6. Prima-facie,

it seems that the respondent No. 6 is intending to

relieve the applicant on completion of his deputation

period and accordingly, he has issued the impugned

order dated 06.11.2019. Prima-facie, it seems that

there is no illegality in the impugned order and

therefore, in my view, it is not a fit case to grant

interim relief in favour of the applicant. Hence, the

interim relief as prayed for by the applicant is hereby

rejected.


17.12.2019.



issued.



//3// O.A. No. 1015/2019


















12. S.O. to 17.12.2019.


parties.




(Shri Rajendra A. Jehurkar V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------OFFICE ORDER TRIBUNAL’S ORDERS


Shri S.D. Joshi, learned Advocate for the

applicant (Absent).Heard Shri V.R. Bhumkar, learned Presenting

Officer for the respondent Nos. 1 to 3 and Shri V.B.

Wagh, learned Advocate for respondent No. 4.

2. Pleadings are complete. Hence, the present O.A.

is admitted and it be kept for final hearing on

13.01.2020.




(Shri Gajendra R. Patil V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------OFFICE ORDER TRIBUNAL’S ORDERS



the applicant and Shri V.R. Bhumkar, learned



reply on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 to 5. Same is


the other side.

3. S.O. to 15.01.2020.




(Dr. Sanjay V. Deshpande V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------OFFICE ORDER TRIBUNAL’S ORDERS



the applicant and Shri M.P. Gude, learned Presenting



reply on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 to 3. Same is


the other side.

3. S.O. to 15.01.2020.




(Shri Arjun M. Maskar and Anr. V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------OFFICE ORDER TRIBUNAL’S ORDERS


Heard Shri S.S. Dambe, learned Advocate holding

for Shri R.P. Bhumkar, learned Advocate for the

applicant, Smt. Sanjivani K. Deshmukh-Ghate,

learned Presenting Officer for the respondent No. 1

and Shri S.D. Dhongde, learned Advocate for

respondent Nos. 2 & 3.

2. Pleadings are complete. Hence, the present O.A.

is admitted and it be kept for final hearing on

14.01.2020.




(Shri Shrirang P. Chavan V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------OFFICE ORDER TRIBUNAL’S ORDERS


Shri K.G. Salunke, learned Advocate for the

applicant (Leave Note).

Heard Shri N.U. Yadav, learned Presenting


2. In view of leave note filed by learned Advocate for

the applicant, S.O. to 12.12.2019.




(Shri Udhav U. Thorat V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------OFFICE ORDER TRIBUNAL’S ORDERS



applicant and Shri B.S. Deokar, learned Presenting















4. Learned P.O. has submitted that the applicant





//2// O.A. No. 1016/2019


supported the same.


















rejected.


17.12.2019.



issued.



//3// O.A. No. 1016/2019


















12. S.O. to 17.12.2019.


parties.




(Shri Sahebrao M. Jadhav V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------OFFICE ORDER TRIBUNAL’S ORDERS



applicant and Smt. M.S. Patni, learned Presenting



















directed to relieve. She has submitted that there is no

//2// O.A. No. 1017/2019

illegality in the impugned order and therefore, she

supported the same.


















rejected.


17.12.2019.



issued.



//3// O.A. No. 1017/2019


















12. S.O. to 17.12.2019.


parties.




(Shri Suresh Ganesh Kamble V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------OFFICE ORDER TRIBUNAL’S ORDERS



applicant and Shri I.S. Thorat, learned Presenting




















//2// O.A. No. 1018/2019


supported the same.


















rejected.


17.12.2019.



issued.



//3// O.A. No. 1018/2019


















12. S.O. to 17.12.2019.


parties.




(Shri Vitthal B. Patole V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------OFFICE ORDER TRIBUNAL’S ORDERS



applicant and Shri N.U. Yadav, learned Presenting




















//2// O.A. No. 1020/2019


supported the same.


















rejected.


17.12.2019.



issued.



//3// O.A. No. 1020/2019


















12. S.O. to 17.12.2019.


parties.




(Shri Rajendra D. Tubakale V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------OFFICE ORDER TRIBUNAL’S ORDERS



the applicant, Smt. Sanjivani K. Deshmukh-Ghate,

learned Presenting Officer for the respondent No. 1

and Shri Anant Devkate, learned Advocate for

respondent No. 3. Shri S.B. Pulkundwar, learned

Advocate for respondent No. 4, absent.

2. Learned Presenting Officer seeks time to take

instructions from the respondents and to satisfy the

Tribunal as to whether the applicant has been

transferred / shifted from the present place of posting.

3. S.O. to 05.12.2019. Interim relief granted earlier

to continue till then.




(Shri Ashok B. Nagargoje V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------OFFICE ORDER TRIBUNAL’S ORDERS


Heard Shri S.S. Dambe, learned Advocate for the

applicant and Shri N.U. Yadav, learned Presenting






AURANGABAD BENCH, AURANGABADM.A. No. 368/2019 in O.A. No. 701/2019

(Shri Bapusaheb V. Patare V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------OFFICE ORDER TRIBUNAL’S ORDERS



applicant and Shri M.S. Mahajan, learned Chief


2. Learned Chief Presenting Officer has filed

affidavit in reply on behalf of respondent No. 1. Same

is taken on record and copy thereof has been served

on the other side.

3. After hearing the matter for considerable time, it

is closed for orders.



AURANGABAD BENCH, AURANGABADM.A. No. 459/2019 in O.A. No. 618/2019

(Shri Dhondiram G. Kamble V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------OFFICE ORDER TRIBUNAL’S ORDERS


Shri U.L. Momale, learned Advocate for the

applicant (Absent)Heard Smt. M.P. Patni, learned Presenting Officer

for the respondents.


reply on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 to 4 in M.A. Same

is taken on record.

3. S.O. to 11.12.2019.




(Shri Anil A. Beedkar V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------CORAM : B.P. PATIL, ACTING CHAIRMAN

[This matter has been placed before theSingle Bench due to non-availability ofDivision Bench]

DATE : 19.11.2019ORAL ORDER :

Heard Shri Anand D. Kaware, learned Advocate

holding for Shri Yogesh P. Deshmukh, learned

Advocate for the applicant and Shri I.S. Thorat,


2. At the request and by consent of both the parties,

S.O. to 08.01.2020.

ACTING CHAIRMANORAL ORDERS 19.11.2019-HDD



(Shri Dasrao T. Deshpande V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)





Heard Shri Anand Devakate, learned Advocate for



2. It transpires from the proceedings that the

present Original Application is barred by limitation.

However, learned Advocate for the applicant seeks

time to file application for delay condonation.

3. In view of the above, the present case be removed

from the board with liberty to the applicant to circulate

the same as and when occasion arises.



AURANGABAD BENCH, AURANGABADC.P.NO. 50/2019 IN O.A.NO. 242/2017

(Shri Mohan R. Chaudhari V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)






the applicant and Shri M.S. Mahajan, learned Chief


2. Learned Advocate for the applicant seeks leave of

this Tribunal to correct the name of the contemnor No.

1 in the present contempt petition.

3. Leave granted as prayed for by the learned

Advocate for the applicant is granted. The learned

Advocate for the applicant undertakes to amend the

contempt petition within a period of two weeks.


from the board with liberty to the learned Advocate for

the applicant to circulate the same as and when

occasion arises.




(Shri Bhaskar S. Patil V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)






the applicant and Shri M.P. Gude, learned Presenting












occasion arises.




(Shri Nitinkumar T. Adhe V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)


















occasion arises.




(Shri Shafi K. Shaikh V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)





Shri Abhijit P. Avhad, learned Advocate for the

applicant (absent). Shri M.S. Mahajan, learned Chief

Presenting Officer for the respondents, present.

2. At the request of learned Chief Presenting Officer

for the respondents, S.O. to 18.12.2019 for filing

affidavit in reply, as a last chance.



AURANGABAD BENCH, AURANGABADM.A.NO. 428/2019 IN O.A.NO. 707/2019

(Shri Rama M. Shinde V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)





Heard Shri S.K. Mathpati, learned Advocate for

the applicant and Mrs. Deepali S. Deshpande, learned

Presenting Officer for the respondent Nos. 1 to 3 & 5.

Shri G.N. Patil, learned Advocate for respondent No. 6

(absent).

2. Await service for respondent No. 4.


affidavit in reply on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 to 3 &

5. Time granted.

4. S.O. to 18.12.2019.




(Smt. Trupti V. Tandale V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)





Heard Shri Chandrasen A. Shingare, learned

Advocate for the applicant and Mrs. Priya R.

Bharaswadkar, learned Presenting Officer for the

respondents.

2. Issue notice to respondents, returnable on

09.01.2020.



issued.







5. This intimation/notice is ordered under Rule 11

of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal



:: - 2 - ::O.A. NO. 988 OF 2019










8. S.O. to 09.01.2020.


parties.




(Shri Bhagwat D. Bedke V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)





Heard Shri K.C. Sonone, learned Advocate

holding for Shri R.P. Bhumkar, learned Advocate for

the applicant and Shri I.S. Thorat, learned Presenting



S.O. to 04.12.2019.

ACTING CHAIRMAN

ORAL ORDERS 19.11.2019-HDD



(Shri Kailash A. Pardeshi V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)





Heard Shri Sandip G. Kulkarni, learned Advocate

holding for Shri Ajay S. Deshpande, learned Advocate

for the applicant and Smt. M.S. Patni, learned


2. At the request of learned Presenting Officer for

the respondents, S.O. to 19.12.2019 for filing affidavit

in reply of respondent Nos. 2 & 3.

ACTING CHAIRMAN




(Dr. Vaishali R. Jadhav V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)





Heard Shri Jayant S. Deshmukh, learned

Advocate for the applicant, Shri M.S. Mahajan, learned

Chief Presenting Officer for the respondent Nos. 1 to 3

and Shri B.G. Deshmukh, learned Advocate holding

for Shri B.N. Gadegaonkar, learned Advocate for

respondent No. 4.

2. At the request of learned Chief Presenting Officer,

S.O. to 18.12.2019 for filing affidavit in reply, as a

most last chance.

ACTING CHAIRMAN




(Dr. Suryakant D. Sonkhedkar V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)






Advocate for the applicant and Shri B.S. Deokar,



to 06.01.2020 for filing affidavit in reply.

ACTING CHAIRMAN




(Dr. Padmaja Ajay Saraf V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)






Advocate for the applicant and Shri N.U. Yadav,




ACTING CHAIRMAN




(Shri Shantaram M. Sonwane V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)





Heard Shri Suresh D. Dhongde, learned Advocate

for the applicant and Shri N.U. Yadav, learned



S.O. to 19.12.2019.

ACTING CHAIRMAN




(Dr. Atul A. Deshmukh V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)





Heard Shri Sandip G. Kulkarni, learned Advocate

holding for Shri Ajay S. Deshpande, learned Advocate

for the applicant and Smt. Sanjivani Deshmukh-

Ghate, learned Presenting Officer for the respondents.



ACTING CHAIRMAN



AURANGABAD BENCH, AURANGABADO.A.NOS. 377 TO 382, 565, 630, 631, 660, 661, 677, 714 AND 886

ALL OF 2019(Shri Somnath A. Nande & Ors. V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)



[This matter has been placed before theSingle Bench due to non-availability of

Division Bench]


Heard Shri Chandrasen A. Shingare, learned

Advocate for the applicants in O.A. Nos. 377 to 382 & 886

all of 20198, Shri R.D. Khadap, learned Advocate for the

applicants in O.A. Nos. 630, 631 677 & 714 all of 2019 and

Shri K.B. Jadhav, learned Advocate holding for Shri A.R.

Tapse, learned Advocate for the applicants in O.A. Nos.

565, 600 & 661 all of 2019 and S/Shri M.S. Mahajan &

N.U. Yadav, learned Chief Presenting Officer & learned

Presenting Officer for respective respondents in respective

cases.

2. Learned Presenting Officer has filed affidavit in reply

on behalf of respondent No. 2 and the same is taken on

record and copy thereof has been served on the other side.


affidavit in reply in O.A. Nos. 631 & 677 both of 2019.

Time granted.

4. S.O. to 09.01.2020.




(Shri Vikas Vijay Salve V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)





Shri P.B. Rakhunde, learned Advocate for the

applicant (absent). Mrs. Priya R. Bharaswadkar,

learned Presenting Officer for the respondents,

present.



ACTING CHAIRMAN



AURANGABAD BENCH, AURANGABADM.A.NO. 93/17 WITH M.A.409/14 IN O.A.ST.1452/14

(Smt. Manjushree B. Deshpande V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)





Heard Shri Ashish Rajkar, learned Advocate

holding for Shri H.A. Joshi, learned Advocate for the





ACTING CHAIRMAN




(Shri Sanjay Bhaskar Udar V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)





Heard Shri Kakasaheb B. Jadhav, learned

Advocate for the applicant and Mrs. Priya R.

Bharaswadkar, learned Presenting Officer for the

respondents.



ACTING CHAIRMAN




(Shri Anil A. Beedkar V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)







2. The present case has been heard at length and

reserved for orders.




(Shri Prashant B. Kachawa V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)




Shri Kiran G. Salunke, learned Advocate for the

applicant has filed leave note. Shri N.U. Yadav,

learned Presenting Officer for the respondents,

present.

2. In view of leave note filed by the learned Advocate

for the applicant, S.O. to 02.01.2010.




(Shri Pandurang R. Chinchale V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)




Heard Smt. Vidya Taksal, learned Advocate

holding for Shri Avinash S. Deshmukh, learned

Advocate for the applicant and Shri N.U. Yadav,

learned Presenting Officer for the respondent Nos. 1 &

4. Shri D.T. Devane, learned Advocate for respondent

Nos. 2 & 3 has filed leave note.

2. In view of leave note filed by the learned Advocate

for respondent Nos. 2 & 3, S.O. to 02.01.2020.




(Dr. Usha N. Bholane V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)




Heard Shri K.A. Ingle, learned Advocate for the

applicant and Shri M.P. Gude, learned Presenting

Officer for the respondent Nos. 1 to 4. Shri B.S.

Deshmukh, learned Advocate for respondent No. 5

(absent).

2. Learned Presenting Officer for respondent Nos. 1

to 4 has filed a copy of communication received to him

form Deputy Director, Health Services, Nashik and the

same is taken on record and marked as document ‘X’

for the purposes of identification.


to 02.01.2020.




(Shri Taherali M. Sayyed V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)





the applicant and Shri V.R. Bhumkar, learned


2. Learned Presenting Officer for the respondents

submits that the affidavit in reply would be filed

during the course of the day. He undertook to serve

the copy of the same on the learned Advocate for the

applicant.

3. S.O. to 03.12.2019.




(Dr. Dhanraj W. Kendre V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)




Heard Shri Vijay V. Deshmukh, learned Advocate

for the applicant and Mrs. Deepali S. Deshpande,


2. This is an application filed by the applicant for

restoration of the accompanying Original Application,

which was dismissed in default by this Tribunal by an

order dated 24.09.2019.

3. For the reasons stated in the Misc. Application,

the same is allowed subject to costs of Rs. 5,000/-.

The amount of costs shall be deposited by the

applicant in the office of this Tribunal on or before

03.12.2019.

4. On depositing the amount of cost of Rs. 5,000/-

the accompanying Original Application shall be

restored to its original file.

5. Accordingly, the present M.A. stands disposed of

without any order as to costs.


Date post:	28-Mar-2023
Category:	Documents
Upload:	khangminh22
View:	0 times
Download:	0 times

19.11.2019 - Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal

Documents