Date post: | 27-Feb-2023 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | khangminh22 |
View: | 0 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Material in this publication is not copyrighted and may be reproduced. The Texas Education Agency would appreciate credit for the material used and a copy of the reprint.
Additional copies of this document may be purchased by using the order form found in the back of this publication.
Additional information about this report may be obtained by contacting the Texas Education Agency, Office of Policy Planning and Research, Research and Evaluation Division at (512) 463-9701.
iii
Report on Texas Public School Dropouts - 1996-97
Table of Contents
Highlights .................................. ........................................ ............... vi
Executive Summary.......................................................................... 1
Preface .............................................................................................. 3
Dropout Definition, Data Collection, and Methodology .. ........... ... .. 3
State Dropout Rate .................... ... ... ................... ...... ... ......... ...... ... ... 6
Characteristics of Dropouts .. ... ...................... ... ...... .......................... 8
Reasons for Dropping Out ................................................................ 11
District Characteristics ..................................................................... 12
Trends in State Dropout Rates ........................................ ... ............... 13
Projected Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Dropout Rates ....... ..... 14
An Update to the National Dropout Rate......................................... 16
Dropout Prevention Strategies.......................................................... 19
Relevant Literature ................ ........................................................... 23
Appendix A: 1996-97 Dropout Rates by District Characteristics ... 25
Appendix B: 1996-97 Total Dropout Rate and Estimated Longitudinal Rate by County, District, and Campus.............. 37
1996-97 TEXAS PuBLIC SCHOOL DROPOUT REPORT
iv
Report on Texas Public School Dropouts - 1996-97
List of Tables
Table 1: 1996-97 Recovered Dropouts by Reason ....... ...... ... ... ... .... 5
Table 2: 1996-97 Texas Dropout Rates by Ethnicity, Gender, and Grade Level................................................................ 6
Table 3: 1996-97 Texas Dropout Rates - Grade by Ethnicity ...... 7
Table 4: 1996-97 Texas Dropout Characteristics ............................ 8
Table 5: 1996-97 Texas Dropout Rates by Age .............................. 10
Table 6: 1996-97 Texas Dropout Characteristics ...... ....... ........... .... 10
Table 7: Texas Top Ten Reasons for Leaving School, as Reported by School Districts for 1996-97 ..... ...... ... ....... 11
Table 8: Texas Historical Dropout Rates by Ethnicity .................... 15
Table 9: Texas Projected Dropout Rates by Grade ......................... 16
Table 10: NCES National Comparison Dropout Rates for States With Data (Grades 9-12, 1994-95) ....................... 17
Table 11: National Dropout Rates for Grades 10-12 as of October 1996 ..... ................. ... ... ...... ......................... 18
List of Figures
Figure 1: Texas Percentage of Total Dropouts by Ethnicity ........... 13
Figure 2: Texas Percentage of Total Dropouts by Grade Level ...... 14
1996-97 TEXAS PUBLIC SCHOOL DROPOUT REPORT
v
Mike Moses Commissioner of Education
Joe Neely Deputy Commissioner
Department of Finance and Accountability
Criss Cloudt Associate Commissioner
Office of Policy Planning and Research
Maria D. Whitsett Director
Research and Evaluation Division
Nancy Smith Project Director
Yvonne Liang Systems Analyst
Richard Kallus Planner IV
Vicky A. Killgore Graphics, Layout, and Design
James Farrell Information Systems Department
J996-97 TEXAS PUBLIC SCHOOL DROPOUT REPORT
vi
Highlights
How many students drop out?
+ In 1996-97, a total of26,901 students in Grades 7-12 dropped out of Texas public schools.
+ Statewide, the annual dropout rate was 1.6 percent, a slight improvement over the 1995-96 annual dropout rate of 1.8 percent.
+ The estimated longitudinal dropout rate of 9.1 percent represents a decrease of 1 percent from the previous school year.
Who drops out and why?
+ More than 80 percent of dropouts were overage for grade.
+ Ou average, males dropped out at a higher rate than females.
+ Hispanics made up the largest proportion of dropouts (51.5%), followed by Whites (29.4%).
+ Reasons cited for leaving school included poor attendance, entering non-state-approved GED programs, and pursuing a job.
Are they leaving certain districts?
+ School districts with the largest enrollments (50,000 or more students) had the highest average dropout rate, at 2.1 percent.
+ Generally, districts with lower student passing rates on the Texas Assessment of Academic Skills (TAAS) had higher dropout rates.
How do we compare nationally?
+ Based on the Current Population Survey, 5 percent of students in Grades 10-12 dropped out of school across the nation.
+ Texas had the second lowest dropout rate out of 29 states that met required Common Core of Data collection standards for school year 1994-95. Only North Dakota outperformed Texas on this measure.
1996-97 TEXAS PUBLIC SCHOOL DROPOUT REPORT
Page I
Report on Texas Public School Dropouts - 1996-97
Executive Summary
A total of 26,901 Texas public school students in Grades 7-12 were reported to have dropped out in 1996-97. This represents a statewide annual dropout rate of 1.6 percent, a slight decline from the 1995-96 rate of 1.8 percent. The estimated longitudinal dropout rate also changed, dropping 1 percent from the previous school year to 9 .1 percent. One of the objectives of public education is that, through enhanced dropout prevention efforts, all students will remain in school until they obtain high school diplomas (TEC §4.001). The target set in law is to reduce the annual and longitudinal dropout rates to 5 percent or less by the 1997-98 school year (TEC §39.182).
An examination of the characteristics of 1996-97 dropouts and their education programs reveals that more than 80 percent of the students who left school that year were overage for grade. Males were more likely to drop out than females, and Hispanics made up the greatest proportion of dropouts. The largest number of dropouts was found in ninth grade, whereas the highest dropout rate was found among 12th graders. Fewer than 40 percent of 1996-97 dropouts were identified as at risk of dropping out of school the year they dropped out. Some reasons cited for dropouts leaving school included poor attendance, entering non-state-approved GED programs, and pursuing a job.
At the district level, dropout rates tend to vary based on characteristics such as community type, enrollment, and student performance. For example, urban school districts with large student enrollments and other central city districts generally had the highest dropout rates in 1996-97. Districts with lower student performance on the Texas Assessment of Academic
1996-97 ThxAS PUBLIC SCHOOL DROPOUT REPORT
Page2
Skills (T AAS) test had higher dropout rates on average than highperforming districts.
Nationally, the annual dropout rate for students in Grades 10-12 was an estimated 5 percent, representing almost one-half million students. As in Texas, Hispanic students had the highest dropout rate in the country.
To provide a basis for state-by-state comparisons, the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) developed a definition of "dropout" that could be adopted and implemented by all states. Through the Common Core of Data collection, 29 states and the District of Columbia submitted data that met quality and comparability standards required to publish state estimates for 1994-95. Texas, at 2.7 percent, had the second lowest dropout rate. This rate was higher than the reported state rate of 1.8 percent, primarily due to differences in the dropout definitions and methodologies used by NCES and the State of Texas. Other rates that year ranged from a low of 2.5 percent to a high of 10.6 percent.
1996-97 TEXAS PUBLIC SCHOOL DROPOUT REPORT
Page3
Preface
This annual report provides information about dropouts in Texas public schools. Updated for the 1996-97 school year, the report includes historical dropout information; a snmmary of dropout rates based on school district characteristics; a listing of dropout rates broken down by county, district, and campus; and national comparative data.
Dropout Definition, Data Collection, and Methodology
After the end of each school year, districts report dropout information for Grades 7-12 through the Public Education Information Management System (PEIMS). Under the PE/MS Data Standards (TEA, 1997b), students in Grades 7-12 are dropouts if they (1) are absent without approved excuses or documented transfers and do not return to school by the fall of the following school year, or (2) complete the school year but fail to reenroll the following school year.
Students in the following categories are identified as dropouts in the state's integrated accountability system.
• A student identified under the preceding definition • A student who leaves school to enter the military before graduation • A student from a special education, ungraded, or alternative education
program who leaves school • A student who leaves school and enters a program not qualifying as an
elementary/secondary school (e.g., cosmetology school) • A student enrolled as a migrant, whose whereabouts are unknown
Students in the following categories may be reported through PEIMS but are not included in the dropout count.
• A student who dies • A student who drops out before the seventh grade • A student who is out of school for a temporary period with an
approved excuse • A student showing regular attendance at a state-approved alternative program • A student enrolled as a migrant who subsequently has a school enrollment
record (i.e., a New Generation System (NGS) education record is available) • A student known to have transferred to another public school, an adult or
alternative education program, or home schooling • A student who moves to another grade level • A student who leaves school to enroll in college early • A student transferred or assigned to another public institution or
state-approved educational program • A foreign student who leaves school to return to his or her home country
1996-97 TEXAS PuBLIC SCHOOL DROPOUT REPORT
Page4
In 1990-91, the Texas Education Agency (TEA) began an automated statewide recovery of reported dropouts. The dropout recovery process removes a dropout from the number submitted by a school district if the reported dropout:
1. has remained enrolled in public school somewhere in the state, according to the school district attendance and enrollment information provided through PEIMS;
2. has received a GED certificate and appears on the GED information file at the time recovery procedures are executed;
3. has graduated within the last year; 4. was expelled for criminal behavior occurring on school property or at a
school-related function and was incarcerated; 5. was identified as a dropout at any time back to the 1990-91 school year.
A student will be counted as a dropout only once in his or her lifetime, even if the student drops out repeatedly. First-time dropout identification applies to dropouts reported since the 1990-91 school year, the first year that student identification data were collected along with the dropout record;
6. met all graduation requirements but did not pass the exit-level TAAS test;
7. withdrew to return to his or her home country; 8. was attending an approved alternative program; or 9. withdrew to attend college.
In 1996-97, the recovery process identified 16, 167 students who were not included in the final dropout count. Table 1 presents the number and percentage of dropouts recovered for each reason.
Currently, the annual dropout rate is calculated by dividing the number of dropouts by cumulative enrollment in Grades 7-12. Cumulative enrollment is the count of all students reported in attendance during any six-week reporting period. If a student enrolls on several campuses during a school year, the student is counted in attendance at every campus on which he or she is enrolled. However, when aggregating dropout information, the student is counted only once at the campus, district, county, region, and state levels. Cumulative enrollment more closely parallels the number of dropouts counted for that entire school year. Although this rate is less comparable to the dropout rates reported before 1992-93, it provides a more accurate reflection of the dropout situation and more uniform data for comparison between districts and campuses.
An estimated longitudinal rate for Texas can be calculated by subtracting the annual rate as a percentage of 1.0 and raising the resulting retention rate to the sixth power. The retention rate is then subtracted from 1.0 for the final estimated longitudinal dropout rate.
1996-97 TEXAS PUBLIC SCHOOL DROPOUT REPORT
Page5
Table 1. 1996-97 Recovered Dropouts by Reason
Recoverv Reason Freauencv Percenta<'e
Moved to another district 3,438 21.3%
Enrolled into an approved alternative program 3,413 21.1%
Returned to home country 2,531 15.6%
Received a GED certificate 2,528 15.6%
Dropout in a previous school year 1,985 12.3%
Met all graduation requirements but failed Exit TAAS 1,782 11.0%
Expelled for criminal behavior 317 2.0%
Entered college 80 0.5%
Not ADA eligible 64 0.4%
Graduated 16 0.1%
Duplicate reporting 13 0.1%
Total Recovered 16,167 100.0%
Source: TEA PEIMS (1997-98)
One longitudinal measure of school success is the calculation of a completion rate, where the progress of students in a given cohort is followed across academic years through their expected graduation year. High school completion rates for 1995-96 and 1996-97 will be reported in the Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) for the first time in 1998.
One of the advantages of reporting a completion rate is that it measures success rather than failure (i.e., dropping out). Completion rates should not be simplistically viewed as the complement of the estimated longitudinal dropout rate, however. As calculated for the integrated accountability system, completion rates are based on Grades 9-12; while the annual dropout rate is computed across Grades 7-12, and consequently so is the estimated longitudinal dropout rate. Further, completion rates are based on actual student progress through the Texas public education system, as reported in PEIMS; the estimated longitudinal dropout rate is only a calculated estimate. Until this year, the agency has not had the data required to compute actual longitudinal dropout rates across Grades 7-12.
1996-97 TEXAS PUBLIC SCHOOL DROFOUT REPORT
Page6
State Dropout Rate
The total number of dropouts for the 1996-97 school year was 26,901. This represents a decline of over 2,300 students from school year 1995-96. As shown in Table 2, the 1996-97 annual dropout rate was 1.6 percent, a slight improvement over the previous year's rate of 1.8 percent. The estimated longitudinal dropout rate also changed, dropping a full percentage point to 9.1 percent.
As in past years, dropout rates among certain ethnic minorities remained significantly higher than the overall dropout rate. The annual dropout rate for Hispanic students in 1996-97 was 2.3 percent. African American students had a 2 percent annual dropout rate. Although their rates declined from 1995-96, these groups continued to have the highest rates among all ethnic groups. All other student groups had dropout rates that were lower than the overall state rate.
The estimated longitudinal dropout rates for Hispanic and African American students were also higher than the rates for other groups. The longitudinal rate for Hispanic students was 13 percent, while the rate for African American students was 11.3 percent. Achieving a longitudinal rate of 5 percent (a goal first established by the legislature in 1984) is still a significant challenge for these groups of students and the
Table 2. 1996-97 Texas Dropout Rates by Ethnicity, Gender, and Grade Level
7 - 12th Grade
Enrollment Total
Dropouts
Percentage of Total
Dropouts
Annual Dropout
Rate
Estimated Longitudinal
Rate
.Ethnicitv .
White 815,175 7,894 29.4% 1.0% 5.7% African American 240,142 4,737 17.6% 2.0% 11.3%
Hispanic 603,067 13,859 51.5% 2.3% 13.0%
Other 47,588 411 1.5% 0.9% 5.1% .Gender• .. .. .·•
Male 878,314 14,618 54.3% 1.7% 9.6% Female 827,658 12,283 45.7% 1.5% 8.6%
.Grade Level
7 8
9 10 11
12
307,283 303,353 367,960 278,762 231,081
217,533
819 1,508
8,374 6,069 4,782
5,349
3.0% 5.6%
31.1% 22.6% 17.8%
19.9%
0.3% 0.5% 2.3% 2.2% 2.1%
2.5%
1.9% 3.0%
12.9% 12.4% 11.8%
13.9% Total 1,705,972 26,901 100.0% 1.6% 9.1%
Source: TEA PEIMS (1997-98)
1996-97 TEXAS PuBLIC SCHOOL DROPOUT REPORT
Page7
Grade
7
8
9
10
11
12
Table 3. 1996-97 Texas Dropout Rates
African American Hispanic Other
0.3% 0.4% 0.2% (142 / 43,071) (574 / 110,416) (17/ 8,086)
0.5% 0.9% 0.2% (227 / 41,992) (983 / 110,165) (20 / 8,196)
2.6% 3.4% 1.1% (l,419 / 54,477) (4,863 / 144,864) (104/9,094)
2.5% 3.3% 1.1% (955 / 38,671) (3,113 / 94,528) (93 / 8,100)
2.6% 3.0% 1.1% (796131,130) (2,158172,202) (78 / 7,241)
3.9% 3.2% 1.4% (l,198 / 30,801) (2,243169,038) (99 / 6,871)
Grade by Ethnicity
White Total
0.1% 0.3% (161/ 143,856) (819/ 307 ,283)
0.2% 0.5% (278 / 143,000) (l,508 / 303,353)
1.2% 2.3% (1,9881159,525) (8,3741367,960)
1.4% 2.2% (l,908 / 137,463) (6,069 / 278,762)
1.5% 2.1% (l,750/ 120,508) (4,782 / 231,081)
1.6% 2.5% (l,809 / 110,823) (5,349 / 217,533)
Total 2.0% 2.3% 0.9% (4,737 / 240,142) (13,8591603,067) (411147,588)
1.0% 1.6% (7,894 / 815,175) (26,90111,705,972)
Source: TEA PEIMS (1997-98)
educators working with them. Despite the high dropout rates, the total number of dropouts actually declined for all ethnic groups. The dropout rates by gender also are presented in Table 2. The male dropout rate of 1.7 percent was slightly higher than that for females (1.5% ).
Table 2 also shows the dropout rates by grade level for the 1996-97 school year. At 2.5 percent, the dropout rate was highest among 12th grade students, followed by ninth graders at 2.3 percent. This represents a change from the previous year, when students in ninth grade dropped out at a slightly higher rate than 12th graders (2.7% vs. 2.6% ). While both groups experienced declines in their dropout rates from one year to the next, the decrease was greater at the ninth grade level, resulting in a higher dropout rate in Grade 12. In terms of raw numbers, however, more students still dropped out in ninth grade.
Table 3 presents dropout rates for Grades 7-12 by ethnicity. Among Hispanic students, the dropout rate was highest in Grade 9. The highest rates for both Whites and African Americans were found in 12th grade.
1996-97 TEXAS PUBLIC SCHOOL DROPOUT REPORT
Page 8
Table 4. 1996-97 Texas Dropout Characteristics
1994-95 1995-96 1996-97
Economically Disadvantaged Grade 7-12 Enrollment 535,480 555,318 595,036
Percentage of Total 33.1% 33.4% 34.9% Dropouts 10,176 9,608 9,393
Percentage of Dropouts 34.0% 32.9% 34.9%
Dropout Rate 1.9% 1.7% 1.6%
At Risk Grade 7-12 Enrollment 655,773 610,263 594,143
Percentage of Total 40.5% 36.7% 34.8%
Dropouts 13,032 11,072 10,588 .
Percentage of Dropouts 43.5% 37.9% 39.4%
Dropout Rate 2.0% 1.8% 1.8%
Overage/Not on Grade Grade 7-12 Enrollment Percentage of Total Dropouts Percentage of Dropouts Drooout Rate
533,820
33.0% 24,952
83.0% 4.6%
536,202
32.3% 23,452
80.3% 4.4%
536,688
31.5% 21,682
80.6%
4.0%
Title I/Chapter 1 Grade 7-12 Enrollment Percentage ofTotal Dropouts Percentage of Dropouts Dropout Rate
.
140,005
8.7%
1,899
6.3% 1.4%
256,167
15.4%
3,217
11.0%
1.3%
363,956 21.3%
4,071
15.1%
1.1%
Source: TEA PE!MS (1995-96-1997-98)
Characteristics of Dropouts
Many factors have been shown to be related to student attrition. Basic demographic characteristics, family and personal background, a student's academic history, and characteristics of the student's school all may influence whether or not a student will stay in school. Table 4 and Table 6 (on page 10) each present a three-year history of Texas dropout information by various student characteristics. An ethnic profile of dropouts covering the last 10 years of available data is presented in Table 8 on page 15.
Table 4 indicates that, compared with their counterparts the year before, economically disadvantaged students in 1996-97 made up larger percentages of both total enrollment and total dropouts in Grades 7-12. Despite these increases, however, the
1996-97 TEXAS PUBLIC SCHOOL DROPOUT REPORT
Page9
dropout rate for this group declined slightly to 1.6 percent, the same as the overall state rate.
Table 4 also shows dropout statistics for at-risk students. Under the Texas Education Code, §29.081, school districts must identify certain students as at risk of school failure or of dropping out. These include each student in Grades 7-12 who:
1. was not advanced from one grade level to the next for two or more school years;
2. is at least two years below grade level in reading or mathematics; 3. has failed at least two courses and is not expected to graduate within
four years of entering ninth grade; 4. has failed at least one section of the most recent T AAS exam; or 5. is pregnant or is a parent.
These indicators, which concentrate on a student's academic history, may not identify those students at risk due to family and personal situations or school-related characteristics. As applied by school districts, the criteria resulted in 34.8 percent of studentsin Grades 7-12 being identified as at risk. Yet, only 39.4 percent of 1996-97 dropouts were identified as at risk of dropping out during the year they actually dropped out of school. Moreover, the dropout rate for at-risk students was just slightly higher than the overall state rate. Of students who graduated in 1996-97, more than one-fourth (27.8%) were identified as at risk of dropping out of school.
Table 5. 1996-97 Texas Dropout Rates by Age
Grade7-12 Percentage Percentage Dropout Enrollment of Total Dro outs of Dropouts Rate
September 1 Age
100 0.01% 1 0.01%
'6,181'
227,193 ;-' _·-;/ :-_>-
290,769
297,016
292;05.5
278,393
226;68Q.
62,959
l '7il29
5,464
i;454·
. 0.4%
13.3%
1·7.0%
17.4%
l?:l'lF
16.3%
13.'3%
3.7%
to'%
0.3%
Q,1%
o.2%.
328 1.2%
. ·845 .3:1%.·
1,582 5.9% 0.5% ----·'
$;212 if,!)% :.V1%·
6,216
7.6il5 4,397
i;9f.l4·
610 2.3% 11.2%
72 0.3% 5iO% Source: IBA PEIMS (1997·98)
1996-97 TEXAS PuBuc SCHOOL DROPOUT REPORT
Page JO
Table 6. 1996-97 Texas Dropout Characteristics
1994-95 1995-96 1996-97
Special Education Grade 7-12 Enrollment 191,052 204,020 Percentage of Total 11.8% 12.3% Dropouts 4,429 4,295 Percentage of Dropouts 14.2% 14.7% Dropout Rate 2.2% 2.1%
216,614 12.7% 4,092
15.2% 1.9%
Bilingual/English as a Second Language Grade 7-12 Enrollment 80,782 83,269 Percentage of Total 5.0% 5.0% Dropouts 2,397 2,297 Percentage of Dropouts 8.0% 7.9% Dropout Rate 3.0% 2.8%
86,292 5.1% 2,188 8.1% 2.5%
Vocational Education Grade 7-12 Enrollment 548,605 592,428 Percentage of Total 33.9% 35.6% Dropouts 9,703 8,535 Percentage of Dropouts 32.4% 29.2% Dropout Rate 1.8% 1.4%
619,776 36.3%
7,888 29.3%
1.3%
Source: TEA PEIMS (1995-96 - 1997-98)
Information is available on the number of dropouts identified as overage for their assigned grade levels. Students who, at the time they drop out, are neither on grade level nor participating in special education programs usually have been retained in at least one grade. As Table 4 indicates, 80.6 percent of dropouts in 1996-97 were overage for grade, compared to 31.5 percent of all students in Grades 7-12. Table 5 on page 9 shows that, while dropouts that year ranged in age from 10 to 21, over 75 percent left at age 16 or older. Those 19 and 20 years of age had the highest dropout rates of the age range examined.
Table 6 presents dropout information for students receiving various educational services, including participants in special, bilingual, and vocational education programs. Although each of these groups represented larger shares of both total enrollment and total dropouts in 1996-97, their dropout rates continued to decline from previous years. For example, the rate at which special education students left school decreased from 2.1 percent in 1995-96 to 1.9 percent in 1996-97. Dropout rates for students in bilingual and vocational programs went down by 0.3 percent and 0.1 percent, respectively, during the same period.
J996-97 TEXAS PUBLIC SCHOOL DROPOUT REPORT
Page 11
Reasons for Dropping Out
School districts recorded reasons for leaving school for 58 percent of the 1996-97 dropouts (see Table 7). Of these 15,798 students, 55.5 percent were reported to have withdrawn because of school-related concerns, such as poor attendance or failing grades; 12.4 percent because of job-related concerns, such as pursuing a job or joining the military; 8.2 percent because of family-related concerns, such as pregnancy or marriage; and another 23.9 percent because of other concerns, such as drugor alcohol-related problems, homelessness, or enrollment in a non-state-approved alternative program. Table 7 shows that 45 percent of dropouts left school because of poor attendance, though the reasons for poor attendance are not known.
The data also suggest some differences in the reasons males and females drop out of school. According to district reports, for instance, over two times as many males as females dropped out to pursue jobs. Females, on the other hand, were more likely than males to leave because of family-related concerns. About 8 percent of females were reported to have dropped out to get married, compared with fewer than 2 percent of males.
Table 7. Texas Top Ten Reasons for Leaving School, as Reported by School Districts for 1996-97
Gender Ethnicity
Reasons for Dropping Out Total Male Female African
American Hispanic Other White
Poor attendance 45.0% 45.8% 44.0% 44.3% 40.9% 53.8% 51.2%
Enter alternative program, not pursuing diploma
Pursue a job
17.8% 18.0% 17.4% 32.8% 15.2% 15.4% 13.4%
12.3% 16.4% 7.1% 5.1% 14.9% 12.0% 12.3%
Low or failing grades 6.8% 7.4% 6.0% 3.0%
6.5%
6.9% 3.8% 8.8%
5.8% 5.8% 2.9%Because of age
To get married
5.0% 5.2% 4.8%
4.2% 1.2% 7.9% 0.2%
2.7%
6.8% 0.5% 2.7%
4.7% 1.0% 3.6%Pregnancy*
Failed exit TAAS/not met all graduation requirements
4.0% - 8.4%
1.8% 1.6% 2.2% 2.4% 1.9% 3.4% 1.4%
Expelled, non-criminal behavior
1.8% 2.6% 0.7% 2.1% 1.6% 2.4% 1.7%
Homeless, or non-permanent resident
0.8% 0.6% 1.1% 0.4% 0.8% 1.0% 1.1%
Source: TEA PEIMS (1997-98). *Females Only.
1996-97 TEXAS PuBLIC SCHOOL DROPOUT REPORT
Page 12
District Characteristics
Texas school districts can differ greatly with regard to characteristics such as community type, district size, student performance, and expenditures. In tum, these district-level characteristics may relate to the dropout rates for individual campuses. Appendix A includes a list of dropout rates by district characteristics.
Generally, school districts are grouped into eight categories based on the types of communities in which they are located. Charter school districts, however, constitute a separate category. Factors such as proximity to a metropolitan area, size, and growth rate are used to determine the appropriate category for each district. (For a complete list of community types and their definitions, refer to Appendix A.) Dropout rates tend to be higher in school districts located in urban areas, and lower in rural and nonmetropolitan fast growing areas. One factor in this variation may be that both minority students and economically disadvantaged students are found in greater numbers in the urban areas, and these students are already known to drop out of public schools at higher rates than their nonminority and wealthier peers.
Higher dropout rates are also found among districts with the largest enrollments, most of which, again, are located in urban areas. Appendix A shows that, in 199697, districts with student enrollments over 50,000 (all of which are considered major urban districts) had the highest average dropout rate, at 2.1 percent. However, districts with enrollments under 500 did not have the lowest dropout rate. The annual dropout rates for these small districts averaged 1.6 percent, compared to 0.8 percent in 1995-96. The State Board of Education approved 16 open-enrollment charter schools for operation during 1996-97. Charter schools are subject to fewer state laws than other public schools, and most are specifically designed to serve students at risk of academic failure or dropping out. As these schools are not part of existing districts, their data were examined separately in this analysis. The overall annual dropout rate for this group was 10.9 percent. Given the distinctly different characteristics of the students served by charters, compared with the state as a whole, their relatively higher dropout rate is not unexpected.
Appendix A also shows dropout rates among school districts based on student performance. Districts are grouped according to the percentage of students passing all Texas Assessment of Academic Skills (T AAS) tests taken. As the percentage of students passing all T AAS tests increases, the dropout rate decreases. The 210 districts with under 67.4 percent of their students passing all TAAS tests taken in 1996-97 had an average dropout rate of 2.1 percent, compared to 0.6 percent in districts with at least 84.4 percent of students having passed the TAAS.
The resources of school districts and campuses have been considered a factor in the ability to supply needed support services for students at risk of dropping out of school. School districts with average and below average operating costs per pupil serve a large proportion of the state's total enrollment and generally a large percent
1996-97 TEXAS PUBLIC SCHOOL DROPOUT REPORT
Page 13
age of the total dropouts. In 1996-97, school districts with the highest operating costs per pupil had the lowest dropout rate, at 0.9 percent, and those with just above average operating costs per pupil had the next lowest dropout rate (l.3%). Close behind were districts with the lowest operating costs, showing the third lowest dropout rate at 1.4 percent. The rate for this group of districts was unchanged from 1995-96.
Trends in State Dropout Rates
Between 1987-88 and 1996-97, the number ofreported dropouts declined steadily by more than 70 percent (see Table 8 on page 15). Improvements to school district student tracking systems probably contributed to some of the reduction in identified dropouts during the first few years of dropout data collection. The 1990-91 and 1992-93 reductions also reflect, in part, enhancements to the statewide dropout recovery system. The significant decline in the number of dropouts reported in 199495 can be partially attributed to changes in the dropout definition and recovery system, such as not including in the count seniors who fail exit-level TAAS but pass all other graduation requirements. Significant reductions are also attributed to the response of students, parents, and educators to use of the dropout rate as a performance indicator in the state accountability system. In 1996-97, both the number of dropouts (26,901) and the statewide annual rate (1.6%) dropped slightly, relative to results in 1995-96.
Minority students have comprised a higher percentage of total dropouts than of enrollment since the 1987-88 school year. As Figure 1 shows, Hispanic students have made up the greatest percentage of dropouts since 1988-89. Overall, the percentage of total dropouts represented by African American students declined by
Figure 1. Texas Percentage of Total Dropouts by Ethnicity
Percentageof Dropouts fL'.] Other mHispanic • African American D White
100%
90% 80%
70% 60%
50% 40%
30% 20%
10% 0%
1987-88 1988-89 1989-90 1990-91 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97
Source: TEA PEIMS (1987-88-1997-98)
1996-97 TEXAS PUBLIC SCHOOL DROPOUT REPORT
Page 14
close to 1 percent from 1995-96, whereas the percentage represented by Hispanic students increased slightly.
Figure 2 shows the percentage of dropouts by grade level from the 1987-88 school year to the 1996-97 school year. While students in the ninth grade consistently represent the largest number of dropouts (i.e., the highest percentage of total dropouts), students in the 12th grade are steadily increasing as a percentage of total dropouts, with the exceptions of 1989-90 and 1994-95. In 1987-88, students in the 12th grade represented almost 12 percent of all dropouts, while in 1996-97 they represented almost 20 percent of all dropouts. The current percentage represents an increase of approximately 60 percent over the 12th grade dropout rate of I 0 years ago. Twelfth graders also had the highest annual dropout rate in 1996-97, at 2.5 percent (see Table 2 on page 6). Between 1992-93 and 1996-97, the greatest declines in numbers of dropouts occurred in the 9th, 10th and 11th grades, while the numbers of dropouts in Grades 7 and 8 began to stabilize.
Projected Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Dropout Rates
Texas Education Code, §39.182, requires TEA to calculate five-year projections of cross-sectional and longitudinal dropout rates for Grades 7-12, with the assumption that no state action is taken to reduce the dropout rate. Projected dropout rates by grade level are calculated by applying the current year ethnic dropout rates to the population for each ethnic group within grade level as current grade levels are incremented for each projected year. That is, the first step in determining the
Figure 2. Texas Percentage of Total Droponts by Grade Level
Percentage ll!D 7th Grade ~ 8th Grade .., 9th Grade D 10th Grade ~ 11th Grade •12th Gradeof Dropouts Ll1 L3I
1987-88 1988-89 1989-90 1990-91 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
Source: TEA PEIMS (1987-88-1997-98)
1996-97 TEXAS PUBLIC SCHOOL DROPOUT REPORT
Page 15
Table 8. Texas Historical Dropout Rates by Ethnicity 7 - 12th Grade
Enrollment Total
Dropouts
Percent of Total
Dropouts
Annual Dropout
Rate
Estimated Longitudinal
Rate
1987-88 White
African American Hispanic
Other Total
744,254
194,373 396,411
28,160 1,363, 198
38,305
16,364 34,911
1,727 91,307
42.0%
17.9% 38.2%
1.9% 100.0%
5.2o/o 8.4o/o 8.So/o 6.1 o/o 6.?o/o
27.2%
41.0% 42.5% 31.6% 34.0%
1988-89
White African American
Hispanic Other Total
724,622 193,299 412,904
29,290 1,360,115
32,921 14,525 33,456
1,423 82,325
40.0% 17.6% 40.6%
1.7% 100.0%
4.5o/o 7.So/o 8.1 o/o
4.9o/o 6.1%
24.3% 37.4% 39.8% 25.8% 31.3%
1989-90 White
African American Hispanic
Other Total
711,264 192,802 427,032
30,396 1,361,494
24,854 13,012 30,857
1,317 70,040
35.5% 18.6% 44.1%
1.9%
100.0%
3.5% 6.8% 7.2% 4.3%
5.1%
I9.2o/o 34.3o/o 33.6o/o 23.3o/o 27.2%
1990-91 White
African American Hispanic
Other Total
703.813 192,504 444,246
32.075 1,372,638
18.922 9,318
24,728
997 53,965
35.1% 17.3% 45.8%
1.8% 100.0%
2.7% 4.8% 5.6%
3.1% 3.9%
15.1% 25.8% 29.1%
17.3% 21.4%
1991-92 White
African American
Hispanic Other Total
712.858 196,915
462.587 34,478
1,406,838
17.745 9,370
25.320 985
53,421
33.2% 17.5%
47.4% 1.8%
100.0%
2.5% 4.8%
5.5% 2.9% 3.8%
14.0% 25.4% 28.7% 16.0% 20.7%
1'992-93 White
African American Hispanic
Other Total
760.143 216,741 516,212
40,101 1.533.197
13,236
7,840 21,512
814 43,402
30.5% 18.1% 49.6%
1.9% 100.0%
1.7%
3.6% 4.2% 2.0% 2.8%
10.0%
19.9% 22.6% 11.6% 15.8%
1993'-94 ,,
White African American
Hispanic Other Total
775,361 221,013 537,594
42,047 1,576,015
11,558 7,090
20,851 712
40,211
28.7% 17.6% 51.9%
1.8% 100.0%
1.5% 3.2% 3.9% 1.7% 2.6%
8.6% 17.8% 21.1%
9.7% 14.4%
1994-95 White 789,481 9,367 31.3% 1.2% 6.9%
African American 227,684 5,130 17.lo/o 2.3% 12.8% Hispanic 556,684 14.928 49.9% 2.7% 15.0%
Other 43,673 493 1.6% 1.1% 6.6% Total 1.617 522 29 918 100.0% 1.8% 10.6%
1995:..96 ','
White 802,509 8,639 29.6% 1.1% 6.3% African American 234,175 5,397 18.5% 2.3% 13.1%
Hispanic 580,041 14,649 50.1% 2.5% 14.2%
Other 45.853 522 1.8% 1.1% 6.6% Total 1,662,578 29,207 100.0% 1.8% 10.1%
19~6-97
White African American
Hispanic Other Total
815,175 240,142
603.067 47,588
1,705,972
7,894 4,737
13,859 411
26,901
29.4% 17.6% 51.5%
1.5% 100.0%
1.0% 2.0% 2.3% 0.9% 1.6%
5.7% 11.3%
13.0% 5.1% 9.1%
Source: TEA PEIMS (1987-88- 1997-98)
1996-97 TEXAS Pueuc SCHOOL DROPOUT REPORT
Page 16
projected 1997-98 rate is to represent all students who were in Grades 6-11 in 1996-97 as 7th-12th graders for 1997-98. The 1996-97 ethnic dropout rates are applied within each incremented grade level and then summed to yield the projected rates for 1997-98. For the next projected year, 1998-99, the same process is now applied to 5th-10th graders who have progressed to Grades 7-12. This method continues for each cohort through the year 2002-03 and is based on the assumption that current ethnic dropout rates will remain constant from year to year.
Table 9 shows the projected grade level (cross-sectional) and longitudinal dropout rates for Texas. Grade level dropout rates continue to reflect higher dropout rates in the 10th and 12th grades. The current longitudinal rate of 9.1 percent remains fairly steady before the year 1999-2000 and slightly increases thereafter through the year 2002-03.
An Update to the National Dropout Rate
NCES, with representatives from state and local education agencies and professional associations, developed a definition of "dropout" that could be adopted and implemented by all states. In 1992-93, NCES began collecting dropout data under the new definition through the Common Core of Data (CCD). The CCD is a standard set of data that NCES collects from every state annually. As of the 1994-95 school year, 29 states and the District of Columbia had submitted data that met quality and comparability standards required to publish state estimates. Table 10 presents preliminary estimates of 1994-95 dropout rates, as reported by NCES (McMillen & Kaufman, 1997).
Table 9. Texas Projected Dropout Rates by Grade
Cross-Sectional Rates by Grade 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03
7 0.3% 0.2% 0.2% 0.2% 0.2% 0.2% 0.3%
8 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5%
9 2.3% 2.1% 2.1% 2.1% 2.1% 2.2% 2.2% .
10 . 2.2% 2.2% 2.2% 2.2% 2.2% 2.2% 2.2%
11 2.1% 2.1% 2.2% 2.1% 2.1% 2.1% 2.1% .
12 2.5% 2.3% 2.4% 2.5% 2.4% 2.4% 2.4%
Total 1.6% 1.6% 1.6% 1.6% 1.6% 1.6% 1.6% '', ,~ t, ,' . · ..
Estimated 9.1% 9.1% 9.1% 9.2% 9.2% 9.2% 9.2%Longitudinal Rate
Source: IBA PEIMS ( 1997-98)
1996-97 TEXAS PUBLIC SCHOOL DROPOUT REPORT
Page 17
As indicated in Table I 0, Texas had a national comparison dropont rate of 2.7 percent in 1994-95. This rate was higher than our reported state rate of 1.8 percent, primarily due to differences in the dropout definitions and methodologies used by
Table 10. NCES National Comparison Dropout Rates for States With Data (Grades 9-12, 1994-95*)
Dropout State Rate
State Dropout (descendin2 order) Rate
Alabama 6.2%
Arkansas 4.9%
California 4.4%
Connecticut 4.9%
Delaware 4.6%
District of Columbia 10.6%
Georgia 9.0%
Hawaii 4.9%
Indiana 4.6%
Iowa 3.4%
Kansas 5.0%
Louisiana 3.5%
Maine 3.3%
Massachusetts 3.5%
Minnesota 5.2%
Mississippi 6.4%
Missouri 7.1%
Nebraska 4.5%
Nevada 10.3%
New Mexico 8.5%
New York 4.1%
North Dakota 2.5%
Ohio 5.3%
Oregon 7.1%
Pennsylvania 4.1%
Rhode Island 4.6%
Texas** 2.7%
Utah 3.5%
West Virginia 4.2%
Wyoming 6.7%
North Dakota 2.5%
Texas** 2.7%
Maine 3.3%
Iowa 3.4%
Louisiana 3.5%
Massachusetts 3.5%
Utah 3.5%
New York 4.1%
Pennsylvania 4.1%
West Virginia 4.2%
California 4.4%
Nebraska 4.5%
Delaware 4.6%
Indiana 4.6%
Rhode Island 4.6%
Arkansas 4.9%
Connecticut 4.9%
Hawaii 4.9%
Kansas 5.0%
Minnesota 5.2%
Ohio 5.3o/o
Alabama 6.2%
Mississippi 6.4%
Wyoming 6.7%
Missouri 7.1%
Oregon 7.1%
New Mexico 8.5%
Georgia 9.0%
Nevada 10.3%
District of Columbia 10.6%
Source: 1994-95/1995-96 Public Elementary/Secondary School Agency Universe Survey, National Center for Education Statistics, December 1997 * National comparison dropout rates are based on the Common Core of Data (CCD)
universe collection. **This rate was higher than the reported state rate of 1.8 percent, primarily due to
differences in the dropout definitions and methodologies used by NCES and the State of Texas.
1996-97 TEXAS PuBLIC SCHOOL DROPOUT REPORT
Page 18
NCES and the state of Texas. The state's methodology is more comprehensive in nature, likely reflecting availability of more data than in other states. For example, fall "snapshot" enrollment data are required for the NCES methodology, while Texas has the capacity to examine attendance over the course of the full school year. Such information cannot be accommodated by NCES because it would preclude comparability of the resulting dropout rates. It is worth noting that the national comparison rate for Texas was the second lowest on the list of 29 states, considerably below that for California (a state with similar demographics).
National Annual Rates
NCES publishes national annual and longitudinal dropout rates based on survey data. The surveys provide a consistent picture of national and regional dropout rates over time. However, the rates are not consistent with those calculated for Texas, and the surveys do not employ samples large enough to provide state-representative findings (Hoffman, 1995).
The national annual rates based on the Current Population Survey conducted by the U.S. Census Bureau are presented in Table 11. Dropouts are defined as those 15through 24-year-olds not currently enrolled in school, who were enrolled a year ago,
Table 11. National Dropout Rates for Grades 10-12 as of October 1996
Total Percent of Annual Dropouts Total Dropout
(Thousands) Droponts Rate
White 267 54.9% 4.1%
African American 103 21.1% 6.7%
Hispanic 100 20.6% 9.0% . .. . Male 241 49.6% 5.0%
Female 245 50.4% 5.1%
15 - 16 Years Old 100 20.5% 3.5%
22.6%17 110 3.4%
18 151 31.1% 5.9%
13.3% 8.9%19 64
12.5%20-24 61 23.7%.. .,I·'·-'"·"" '" ··." Total 485 100.0% 5.0%
Source: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, December 1997 Note: Details may not add to totals because of rounding.
1996-97 TEXAS PUBLIC SCHOOL DROPOUT REPORT
Page 19
and are not high school graduates. From these data, NCES estimates the total number of dropouts nationally for Grades 10-12.
As of October 1996, an estimated 5 percent of students in Grades I 0-12 dropped out of school, representing almost one-half million students. Table 11 presents national dropout rates by ethnicity, gender, and age. The highest dropout rates are found among Hispanic students and students aged 20-24 years old.
National Longitudinal Rates
With the National Education Longitudinal Study of 1988 (NELS:88), NCES began surveying eighth grade students. The survey follows the progress of these students as they continue to postsecondary education or enter the labor force. The cohort of eighth graders in the survey was scheduled to graduate at the end of the 1991-92 school year. Following the 1988 base year data collection, these students were interviewed every two years through 1994. Based on information from interviews conducted the last year, 89 percent of the cohort had completed regular high school programs by the summer of 1992. In addition, 2.5 percent had completed alternative credentials, 0.1 percent had received certificates of attendance, and 5.5 percent were still enrolled in high school programs of some type.
Dropout Prevention Strategies
As Table 7 on page 11 shows, students drop out for many reasons, and rarely is the decision to leave a snap judgment. The literature views dropping out of school as a process that begins with a student "withdrawing or disengaging" from school and then finally dropping out (Hahn, Dauzberger, & Lefkowitz, 1987; Tomlinson, Frase, Fork, & Gonzalez, 1994). Sometimes this disengagement begins in the early grades (elementary or middle school), with the student finally dropping out in high school. To fully comprehend the dropout process, one would have to simultaneously examine the personal life of the student, the school and its local policies and practices, and the state and federal policies that shape the social and educational views of the nation.
Although it is difficult to determine the exact time a student decides to drop out of school, most prevention programs are implemented at the high school level. Even though not all dropouts are identified as at risk of dropping out (in Texas, for example, fewer than 40 percent of all 1996-97 dropouts were identified that year as being at risk, using criteria set in law) the majority of dropout prevention efforts across the nation are aimed at students with certain attributes associated with "at risk" status (Hahn, Danzberger, & Lefkowitz, 1987; Tomlinson, Frase, Fork, & Gonzalez, 1994). These attributes commonly include (a) minority status, (b) low income status, ( c) low academic achievement, and ( d) pregnancy.
1996-97 TEXAS PUBLIC SCHOOL DROPOUT REPORT
Page 20
Prevention programs can vary tremendously in terms of the populations being targeted for services, in the scope and kinds of services offered, and the service delivery mechanisms used. Most of the literature concerning dropout prevention involves evaluations of specific programs to answer the question "Did this program work?" rather than "Why did this program work?" (O'Sullivan, 1990; Paredes, 1996; Wilkinson & Griffith, 1994; and Wilkinson & Mangino, 1994). However, examining successful programs permits identification of strategies commonly employed to deter students from dropping out (Cardenas, Robledo, & Supik, 1986; Duckenfield, Hamby, & Smink, 1990; Hahn, Danzberger, & Lefkowitz, 1987; Ramirez, 1990). These strategies include the following.
* Individualized instruction. Individualized instruction in dropout prevention programs capitalizes on students' unique learning styles and interests and allows them to learn at their own pace and ability level.
* Remediation and/or accelerated instruction. Successful dropout prevention programs remediate students in basic academic skills and/or bring students up to grade level by the end of the program.
* Mentorship and counseling. One of the most effective strategies for a successful dropout prevention program is one-to-one involvement with a mentor. Mentors serve as role models by providing the necessary adult attention and support that will encourage the student to finish school and plan for the future.
Flexibility in programming and scheduling. Dropout prevention programs * serve a diverse population with diverse needs. Therefore, they are flexible about course sequences, course length, classroom structure, and class schedules.
* Trained and committed staff. Successful dropout prevention programs are staffed by individuals who are committed to at-risk teens and are dedicated to program plans and goals. Staff are also trained in tailoring instruction to meet individual student needs.
Parental involvement. Successful dropout prevention programs have the * support of the parent as a mentor and tutor for the child, as well as to the teacher and school.
* Collaboration with the community and businesses. Successful dropout prevention programs collaborate with the community and local businesses. Developing company mentorship programs with at-risk students links the importance of graduation and future employment opportunities.
1996-97 TEXAS PUBLIC SCHOOL DROPOUT REPORT
Page 21
* Matching services to needs. Successful dropout prevention programs work with other governmental agencies to assure students' access to appropriate social services for their immediate needs, so that students in turn can concentrate on finishing school. These services can range from accessing employment-related benefits, to income assistance and day-care services for teenage parents.
Although these strategies show up repeatedly in successful dropout prevention programs, other programs have used additional strategies that have had a positive impact on the dropout rate in communities across the nation, with an apparent "key" being the match between students' needs and local school/community circumstances. Some of these include offering work study programs, implementing year-round schools, offering rewards or incentives, and providing transportation to the program. Other prevention strategies have targeted special groups, such as limited English proficient students, or have provided quality early childhood education, which helps better prepare children for school (Duckenfield, Hamby, & Smink, 1990; Vaznaugh, 1995).
Because dropping out of school can be such a complex process, influenced by a student's ethnicity, socioeconomic status, home life, and academic history, it is important that a school or district first assess the profile of their dropouts before establishing prevention and recovery programs.
1996-97 TEXAS Pueuc SCHOOL DROPOUT REPORT
Page 23
Relevant Literature
Bradby, D., Levesque, K. A., Henke, R. R., & Malitz, G. (Draft, January 1993). A standard national course classification system, draft. (NCES Publication No. 93-). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
Cardenas, J.A., Robledo, M.R., & Supik, J.D. (1986). Texas school dropout survey project: A summary offindings. San Antonio, TX: Intercultural Development Research Association.
Duckenfield, M., Hamby, J.V., & Smink, J. (1990). Effective strategies for dropout prevention: Twelve successful strategies to consider in a comprehensive dropout prevention program. Clemson, SC: The National Dropout Prevention Center. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED322461).
Hahn, A., Danzberger, J., & Lefkowitz, B. (1987). Dropouts in America. Enough is known for action: A report for policymakers and grantsmakers. Washington, DC: Institute for Educational Leadership.
Hoffman, L.M. (1995). State dropout data collection practices: 1991-92 school year. (NCES Publication No. 95-690). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
McMillen, M. M, & Kaufman, P. (1997). Dropout rates in the United States: 1996. (NCES Publication No. 98-250). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
National Foundation for the Improvement of Education. (1990). A blueprint for success. Lessons learned: NF/E's dropout prevention initiative. Washington, DC: National Foundation for the Improvement of Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED331785).
O'Sullivan, R. G. (1990). Evaluating a model middle school dropout prevention program for at-risk students. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston, MA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED317928).
Paredes, T. (1996). Feedback. Delta/NOVANET, 1995-96: First year implementation. Austin, TX: Austin Independent School District, Office of Program Evaluation.
1996-97 TEXAS PuBLIC SCHOOL DROPOUT REPORT
Page 24
Ramirez, A. (1990). These are the hallmarks of effective dropout programs. The Executive Educator, 12(4), 23-25.
Sherman, R.Z., & Sherman, J.D. (1991). Dropout prevention strategies for the 1990s. Washington, DC: Pelavin Associates, Inc. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED343989).
Texas Education Agency (1997a). 1995-96 Report on public school dropouts (GE?-601-08). Austin, TX: Author.
Texas Education Agency (1997b). Public Education information Management System Data Standards. Austin, TX: Author.
Texas Education Code. (1998). Austin, TX.
Tomlinson, T., Frase, M., Fork, D., & Gonzalez, R. (1994). Reaching the goals. Goal 2: High school completion. Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED365471).
Trevino, S. G. (1991). Mission impossible? Success for at-risk students. Principal, 70(3), 31-32.
U.S. Department of Education (1993). Heading toward commencement: Questions and answers on reaching national education goal 2: "By the year 2000, the high school graduation rate will increase to 90 percent." Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED354596).
Vaznaugh, A. (1995). Dropout intervention and language minority youth. ERIC digest. ERIC Clearinghouse on Languages and Linguistics. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED379951).
Wilkinson, D., & Griffith, J. (1994). Overage ninth-grade dropout prevention. Austin Independent School District, Texas. Office of Research and Evaluation. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED380470).
Wilkinson, D., & Mangino, E. (1994). Program effectiveness in A/SD 1992-93. Austin Independent School District, Texas. Office of Research and Evaluation. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED380468).
1996-97 TEXAS PUBLIC SCHOOL DROPOUT REPORT
Page 25
Appendix A 1996-97 Dropout Rates by District Characteristics
1996-97 TEXAS PuBLIC SCHOOL DROPOUT REPORT
APPENDIX A
1996-97 DROPOUT RATES BY DISTRICT CHARACTERISTICS
WHITE AFR. AM HISPANIC ECON DIS 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 ESTIMATED NBR DROPOUT DROPOUT DROPOUT DROPOUT TOTAL 7-12 DROPOUT LONGITUDINAL DIST CATEGORY RATE RATE RATE RATE DROPOUTS ENROLLMENT RATE DROPOUT RATE
ENROLLMENT GROUPINGS
9 OVER 50,000 1.1 2.5 2.4 1.6 7,303 351, 715 2.1 11.B 24 2s 1 000 ro 49,999 46 10 1 000 TO 24,999 66 5 1 000 TO 9,999 82 3,000 TO 4,999
0.9 1.0 0.8 1.0
1. 7 1.5 1.4 1.3
2.3 2.2 1.6 2.0
1.6 1.6 1.2 1.3
5,549 5,445 2, 197 2,059
389,479 336,304 207,222 156,246
1.4 1.6 1.1 1.3
8.3 9.3 6.2 7.7
134 1,600 TO 2,999 0.9 1.3 2.1 1.3 1,868 144,753 1.3 7.5 119 1,000 TO 1,599 1.0 1.2 1.8 1.3 906 76,526 1.2 6.9 213 500 TO 999 0.7 1.4 1.7 1.2 762 77,484 1.0 5.8 366 UNDER 500 0.8 3.6 3.5 1.7 803 48,707 1 .6 9.5
DISTRICT TYPE
9 MAJOR URBAN 1.2 2.5 2.4 1.6 7 ,466 350, 179 2.1 12.1 62 MAJOR SUBURBAN 0.9 1.4 2.0 1.3 6,001 486,905 1.2 7.2 33 OTHER CENTRAL CITY 1.0 1.9 2.4 1.8 4,858 285,808 1. 7 9.8 87 OTHER CC SUBURBAN 0.8 1.4 1.8 1.4 2, 172 169,486 1.3 7.5 78 INDEPENDENT TOWN 0.9 1.6 2.0 1.4 2,068 159,939 1.3 7 .5 130 NON-METRO FAST GROWING 0.7 1.0 1.8 1.4 592 62,878 0.9 5.5 214 NON-METRO STABLE 1.0 1.3 2.0 1.2 2,548 191,215 1.3 7. 7 430 RURAL 16 CHARTERS
0.8 3.7
1.5 11.7
1.5 12.7
1. 1 12.2
789 398
78,379 3,649
1.0 10.9
5.9 50.0
WEALTH (MEDIAN=$129,125)
103 UNDER $67,909 104 $67,909 TO $81,785 104 $81,786 TO $94,881 104 $94,882 TO $111,893 103 $111,894 TO $129,124 104 $129,125 TO $150 1 310 104 $150,311 TO $177,188 104 $177,189 TO $229,791
1.0 0.9 1 .1 1 .1 1. 1 1.0 0.9 0.8
0.7 1.2 1.2 2.0 1.5 1.8 1.4 2.5
2.1 1.7 1.9 2.6 2.0 2.3 2.1 2.6
1.6 1.1 1.2 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.6
3, 112 1 ,677 1,349 1 ,801 2,778 3,729 2,566 4,942
166,839 125,073 96,257
107,990 182,511 247,636 206,532 300, 162
1.9 1.3 1.4 1. 7 1.5 1.5 1.2 1.6
10.7 7.8 8.1 9.6 8.8 8. 7 7.2 9.5
104 $229,792 TO $364,349 103 OVER $364,349 22 NON-TAXING DISTRICTS
0.8 0.7 1.3
1.8 1.3 7.6
2.2 1.4 7.1
1.7 1.0 5.4
3,923 603 412
279,607 68,240
7,591
1 .4 0.9 5.4
8.1 5.2 28.5
WEALTH (ST AVG=$173,038)
714 UNDER $173,038 323 OVER $173,038 22 NON-TAXING DISTRICTS
1.0 0.8 1.3
1.5 2.2 7.6
2.1 2.3 7.1
1.4 1.6 5.4
16,844 9,636
412
1,113,443 667,404
7,591
1.5 1.4 5.4
8.7 8.4
28.5
WEALTH BY EQUAL PUPILS PER GROUP
35 UNDER $47,076 75 $47,076 TO< $69,080 92 $69,080 TO< $81,147 102 $81,147 TO< $93,780 91 $93,780 TO< $107,286 53 $107,286 TO< $117,248 33 $117,248 TO < $122,972 58 $122,972 TO < $133,919 48 $133,919 TO< $141,432 24 $141,432 TO< $148,599 34 $148,599 TO< $155,011 58 $155,011 TO< $168,791
0.8 1.0 0.8 1.1 1.0 1.2 1.2 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.0 0.8
0.4 1.8 1 .1 1 .1 1.3 2.1 1. 7 1.3 1. 7 1.9 1.5 1.4
2.1 2.2 1.5 2.0 1.9 2.7 1.9 2.4 1.8 2.8 2.5 1.9
1.6 1. 7 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.6 1.4
1,534 1,615 1,020 1 ,413 1,282 1 ,666 1,406 1,522 1 ,261 1,469 1,288 1, 195
82,639 86,721 89,047 93,974 91,296 96,536 88,806 98,639 90,648 87,432 94,607
102,084
1.9 1.9 1.1 1.5 1.4 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.4 1. 7 1.4 1.2
10.6 10.7 6.7 8.7 8.1 9.9 9.1 8,9 8.1 9.7 7.9 6.8
59 $168,791 TO< $192,549 0.7 1.6 1. 7 1.3 938 93,253 1.0 5.9 38 $192,549 TO <-$212,268 1.0 2.0 2.3 1.6 1,289 91,606 1.4 8.2 15 $212,268 TO < $218,540 0.7 3.1 3.0 1. 7 2,639 112,918 2.3 13.2 31 $218,540 TO< $245,344 0.8 1 ,5 2.0 1.4 819 67,913 1.2 7 .o 10 $245 1 344 TO< $251,776 53 $251,776 TO< $310,750
1.6 0.6
2.1 1.5
2.9 1.6
2.1 1.2
1 J 782 806
80,446 81,602
2.2 1.0
12.6 5.8
29 $310,750 TO< $370,220 99 $370,220 AND OVER 22 NON-TAXING DISTRICTS
0.6 0.7 1.3
1.8 1.4 7.6
2.1 1.5 7.1
1.6 1.0 5.4
944 592 412
85,379 65,301
7,591
1 .1 0.9 5.4
6.5 5.3 28.5
TOTAL TAX EFFORT (ST AVG=$1.4975)
259 UNDER $1.3576 0.8 2.7 2. 7 1.6 5,087 262,537 1.9 11 . 1 259 $1.3576 TO UNDER $1.4699 1.1 2.0 2.3 1.8 6,456 380,498 1. 7 9.8 260 $1.4699 TO UNDER $1.5720 0.9 1.6 2.0 1.3 6,216 471,999 1.3 7.7 259 $1.5720 AND OVER 0.9 1.3 1.9 1.3 8, 721 665,813 1.3 7.6 22 NON-TAXING DISTRICTS 1.3 7.6 7.1 5.4 412 7 ,591 5.4 28.5
M&O EFF. TAX EFFORT (ST AVG=$1.3125)
259 UNDER $1.1888 0.9 1.5 1.9 1.4 4,500 341 ,459 1.3 7. 7 259 $1.1888 TO $1.3057 0.9 2.4 2.4 1.6 7' 799 466,843 1. 7 9.6 260 $1.3058 TO $1.4303 1.0 1 . 8 2.3 1.6 9,975 612,827 1.6 9.4 259 $1.4304 AND OVER 0.8 1.3 1. 7 1.2 4,206 359,718 1.2 6.8 22 NON-TAXING DISTRICTS 1.3 7.6 7.1 5.4 412 7,591 5.4 28.5
27
APPENDIX A
1996-97 DROPOUT RATES BY DISTRICT CHARACTERISTICS
NBR DIST CATEGORY
WHITE DROPOUT
RATE
AFR. AM DROPOUT
RATE
HISPANIC DROPOUT
RATE
ECON DIS DROPOUT
RATE
1996-97 TOTAL
DROPOUTS
1996-97 7-12
ENROLLMENT
1996-97 DROPOUT
RATE
ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
HIGHEST PROPERTY VALUE CATEGORY
361 339 124 213 22
RESIDENTIAL LAND OIL AND GAS BUSINESS NON-TAXING DISTRICTS
0.9 0.8 0.7 1. 1 1.3
1. 5 1.3 1.3 2.2 7.6
2.1 1. 7 1. 9 2.4 7.1
1.4 1.1 1.3 1.6 5.4
15,293 877 571
9, 739 412
1J127 ,036 83,954 45,329
524,528 7,591
1 .4 1.0 1.3 1.9 5.4
7.9 6.1 7.3 10.6 28.5
SMALL/SPARSE ADJSTMNT (ST AVG=24.0%)
154 226 226 227 226
NO SMALL/SPARSE ADJUSTMENT UNDER 8.1% 8.1% TO UNDER 26.9% 26. 99;; TO UNDER 35. 8% 35.8% AND OVER
0.9 1.0 0.9 0. 7 0.7
2.0 1.4 1.2 1. 7 0.6
2.3 2.0 1. 9 1. 6 1. 3
1.6 1.3 1.3 1.1 1. 1
20,495 4,319 1,326
503 249
1 ,256,393 334,442 116, 123 52,210 29,270
1.6 1.3 1.1 1.0 0.9
9.4 7.5 6.7 5.6 5.0
CE! LEVEL (MEDIAN=1.07)
176 267 246 150 220
UNDER 1 .05 1 . 05 TO UNDER 1.07 TO UNDER 1.09 TO 1 .11 1.11 AND OVER
1 .07 1 .09
1.0 0.9 0.9 0.8 1.0
2.8 1.6 1.6 1.7 1.9
5.0 1.8 2.2 2.1 2.2
1. 9 1.2 1.4 1.4 1.5
957 1,362 1,915 2,774
19,884
57,024 124,532 153,461 221,238
1,232,183
1. 7 1. 1 1.2 1.3 1.6
9.7 6.4 7.3 7.3 9.3
OPERATING COST/PUPIL (ST AVG=$4,717)
211 211 213 213 211
UNDER $4,459 $4,459 TO $4,856 $4,857 TO $5,283 $5,284 TO $6,025 OVER $6,025
1.0 1.0 0.8 0.9 0.7
1.8 2.1 1.6 1.4 1.2
2.3 2.4 1.8 2.2 1.2
1.6 1.6 1.3 1.4 0.9
7' 737 11,937 5,068 1,802
348
550 ,223 685,704 400,078 114,046 38,387
1 .4 1. 7 1.3 1. 6 0.9
8.2 10.0 7.4 9.1 5.3
ESC REGION
39 44 40 61 29 56 96 48 40
I EDINBURG II CORPUS CHRISTI III VICTORIA IV HOUSTON v BEAUMONT VI HUNTSVILLE VII KILGORE VIII MT PLEASANT IX WICHITA FALLS
0.8 1.0 0.6 0.9 1.0 O.B 1.2 1.1 0.9
1.5 1.9 1 .6 2.2 1. 7 1. 6 1. B 1.8 1. 7
1.9 2.4 2.1 2.5 2.0 1. 7 2.1 2.1 1. 5
1.5 1.8 1.6 1.5 1.3 1. 1 1. 5 1 .5 1. 0
2,364 1 ,031
351 5,914
507 607
1,055 345 207
127,560 53,959 27,789
357' 828 41,256 59,081 75,244 25,991 20, 185
1.9 1.9 1.3 1. 7 1.2 1.0 1.4 1.3 1.0
10.6 10.9 7.3 9.5 7.2 6.0 8.1 7.7 6.0
83 77 79 58 43 43 65 60 33 12 53
x RICHARDSON XI FORT WORTH XII WACO XIII AUSTIN XIV ABILENE xv SAN ANGELO XVI AMARILLO XVII LUBBOCK XVIII MIDLAND XIX EL PASO xx SAN ANTONIO
0.9 1.1 0.7 0. 7 1.0 0.9 1.2 0.7 1.5 0.9 1.0
1.8 2.1 1.1 2.1 2.2 2.3 3.2 1.8 3.4 1.4 1 .4
2.7 2.6 1. 5 2.2 2.8 2.3 3.3 2.4 2.9 1.6 2.4
1.8 1. 5 1.0 1.6 1. 7 1.6 1.9 1.4 2.6 0.9 1. 7
3,467 2,437
543 1,377
356 396 717 606 909
1,043 2,669
231 '772 163,996 59,665
109,503 24, 150 25,620 38, 111 39,638 40,047 70,315 1~3,318
1.5 1.5 0.9 1.3 1.5 1 .5 1. 9 1. 5 2.3 1. 5 1. 9
8.7 8.6 5.3 7.3 8.5 8.9 10.B 8.8 12.9 8.6 10.7
TAAS: PCT PASSING ALL TESTS TAKEN
2 210
NO STUDENTS TESTED UNDER 67.4%
0.0 1 .2
0.0 2.3
0.0 2.4
0.0 1. 7
0 11 ,311
0 534,887
0.0 2.1
0.0 12.0
213 67.4% TO UNDER 74.2% 1.1 1.4 2.2 1.5 6,513 402,575 1.6 9.3 209 74.3% TO UNDER 79.0% 1. 0 1.9 2.1 1.4 4,437 310,223 1.4 8.3 213 79.1% TO UNDER 84.4% 0.9 1 .3 1 .6 1 .2 3,499 335,944 1.0 6.1 212 84.4% AND OVER 0.5 0.7 1.1 0.9 1J132 204,809 0.6 3.3
SAT/ACT: PCT TAKING
256 0% TO UNDER 55% 1.3 1.7 2.2 1.6 7 ,201 404,447 1 .8 10.2 346 55% TO UNDER 70% 1.0 2.2 2.3 1.5 14,456 859,561 1. 7 9.7 364 70% AND OVER 0.6 1.2 1.7 1.2 4,732 510,495 0.9 5.4 93 NO GRADUATES 0. 7 3.3 6.3 3.1 503 13,935 3.6 19.8
SAT/ACT: PCT AT OR ABOVE CRITERION
96 106
NONE MET CRITERION UNDER 10%
0.8 0.9
0.7 0.9
1.5 2.1
1.0 1.5
210 3,425
20,214 186,550
1.0 1.8
6.1 10.5
274 10% TO UNDER 20% 1.1 1.8 2.1 1.5 6,082 364,246 1. 7 9.6 382 20% TO UNDER 35% 1.0 2.0 2.3 1 .5 13,052 826,551 1.6 9.1 106 35% AND OVER 0.7 1 .6 1.9 1 .4 3, 716 383,580 1 .0 5.7 91 NO GRADUATES 0.8 10.2 9.5 6.4 406 6,937 5.9 30.4
28
APPENDIX A 1996-97 DROPOUT RATES BY DISTRICT CHARACTERISTICS
WHITE AFR. AM HISPANIC ECON DIS 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 ESTIMATED NBR DIST CATEGORY
DROPOUT RATE
DROPOUT RATE
DROPOUT RATE
DROPOUT RATE
TOTAL DROPOUTS
7-12 ENROLLMENT
DROPOUT RATE
LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
DENSITY (ST AVG=14.10 PUPILS/SQ MI)
501 FEWER THAN 5 0.8 1.4 1.9 1.3 1, 726 145,321 1 .2 6.9 304 5 TO FEWER THAN 20 0.9 1.4 2.0 1.4 3,488 278,836 1.3 7.3 127 20 TO FEWER THAN 100 1.0 1. 7 2. 1 1.5 4,234 309,318 1.4 7.9 105 100 AND OVER 1.0 2.0 2.2 1.5 17,032 1,047,372 1.6 9.4 22 NON-TAXING DISTRICTS 1.3 7.6 7.1 5.4 412 7,591 5.4 28.5
PUPIL CHG:95/96-96/97 (ST AVG=2.37%)
320 DECLINING PUPILS 1.1 2.0 2.8 1.8 5,709 308,697 1.8 10.6 329 0% TO UNDER 3% 1.0 2.0 2.1 1.5 14, 110 871 ,262 1.6 9.3 207 3% TO UNDER 6% 0.8 1.7 2.0 1.5 5,645 423,082 1 . 3 7.7 116 6% TO UNDER 10% 0.6 1.0 1.2 0.9 999 133,577 0.7 4.4 87 10% AND OVER 0.5 1 . 2 1.9 1. 1 429 51,820 0.8 4.9
PCT AFRICAN AM PUPILS (ST AVG=14.3%)
628 UNDER 5% 0.8 1.4 2.0 1 . 5 B,749 618,420 1.4 8.2 152 5% TO UNDER 10% 0.8 1.4 2.2 1.5 41541 372,226 1.2 7.1 138 10% TO UNDER 20% 1.0 1.7 2.2 1.5 5,033 347' 121 1.4 8.4 66 54
20% TO UNDER 30% 30% TO UNDER 50%
0.9 1 . 3
1.3 2.3
2.0 2.9
1.2 1.7
1 ,261 6,764
108,582 306,010
1 . 2 2.2
6.8 12.6
21 50% AND OVER 1.3 1 . 4 2.8 1.3 544 36,079 1.5 8.7
PCT HISPANIC PUPILS (ST AVG=37.4%)
217 166
UNDER 5% 5% TO UNDER 10%
1.0 0.8
1.6 1.4
1.4 1.6
1.2 1.2
1,303 1,728
121, 169 190,227
1. 1 0.9
6.3 5.3
218 10% TO UNDER 20% 0.9 1.2 1.8 1.2 4,207 405,009 1.0 6.1 100 160 198
20% TO UNDER 30% 30% TO UNDER 50% 50% AND OVER
0.9 1.0 1.1
1. 7 2.1 2.7
2.0 2.4 2.2
1.4 1. 7 1 . 6
1,947 6,932
10,775
156, 188 3891 726 526,119
1.2 1.8 2.0
7.3 10.2 11. 7
PCT MINORITY PUPILS (ST AVG=54.4%)
68 UNDER 5% 0.8 0.0 1. 7 1.2 191 24,813 0.8 4.5 123 5% TO UNDER 10% 1.0 1.8 1.2 1.1 699 70,742 1 . 0 5.8 194 10% TO UNDER 20% 0.8 1 . 1 1.6 1. 1 1,456 158, 190 0.9 5.4 156 20% TO UNDER 30% 0.8 1.1 1.5 1.1 1,952 2211293 0.9 5.2 229 289
30% TO UNDER 50% 50% AND OVER
0.9 1.1
1.5 2.1
2.0 2.3
1 .4 1.6
4,655 17,939
381, 191 932,209
1.2 1.9
7.1 11 . 0
PCT ECON DISADV (ST AVG=48.09%)
92 115
UNDER 20% 20% TO UNDER 30%
0.6 0.9
1.3 1 . 1
1.7 1.5
1.2 1. 1
1,814 1,931
239,216 201,816
0.8 1.0
4.5 5.6
181 30% TO UNDER 40% 1.0 1.5 1. 7 1 . 3 2,455 2131536 1.1 6.7 427 176 68
40% TO UNDER 60% 60% TO UNDER 80% 80% AND OVER
1.1 1.2 1.3
1.8 2.3 2.1
2.3 2.3 2.2
1 . 5 1.5 1. 7
9,263 8,043 3,386
584,941 393,203 155,726
1.6 2.0 2.2
9.1 11. 7 12.4
AVG. TEACHER EXPER (ST AVG=11 .7 YRS)
264 265
UNDER 10.3 YEARS 10.3 TO UNDER 11.7 YEARS
1.0 0.9
1. 7 1.6
1.9 2.3
1.3 1.6
3,536 8,389
248,440 565,422
1.4 1.5
8.2 8.6
265 265
11.7 TO UNDER 13.1 YEARS 13.1 YEARS AND OVER
0.9 0.9
2.3 1.7
2.2 2.2
1.5 1.5
9,522 51445
612,478 362,098
1.6 1.5
9.0 8.7
AVG. TEACHER SALARY (ST AVG=$32,426)
264 265 265 265
UNDER $29,392 $29,392 TO UNDER $30,603 $30 1 603 TO UNDER $32,078 $32,078 AND OVER
0.9 1.1 0.9 0.9
2.2 1.6 1.5 2.0
3.2 2.0 2.3 2.1
1.6 1.5 1.5 1.5
1,347 3,233 5,760
16,552
871416 2341045 412,766
1,054,211
1.5 1.4 1.4 1.6
8.9 8.0 8.1 9. 1
PCT MINORITY TCHRS (ST AVG=24.4%)
539 UNDER 5% 0.9 1.3 1.9 1 . 2 3,459 337,073 1.0 6.0 216 5% TO UNDER 10% 0.8 1.5 2.1 1.4 4, 115 370,417 1.1 6.5 146 39 44 75
10% TO UNDER 20% 20% TO UNDER 30% 30% TO UNDER 50% 50% AND OVER
0.9 1.2 1. 1 1.3
1.4 1.9 2.3 2.4
2.0 2.5 2.1 2.3
1.3 1.8 1.5 1.6
41895 2,626 3,389 8,408
371, 164 144,942 181,601 383,241
1.3 1.8 1.9 2.2
7. 7 10.4 10.7 12.5
% TCHRS WADV DEGREE (ST AVG=27.0%)
264 UNDER 13.8% 0.7 1.1 1.8 1.3 1, 764 132,781 1.3 7. 7 265 13.8% TO UNDER 20.3% 0.9 1.5 2.1 1.4 4,519 303,702 1.5 8.6 265 265
20.3% TO UNDER 27.9% 27.9% AND OVER
0.9 1.0
1.6 2.1
2.2 2.4
1.5 1 . 6
8 1 062 12,547
576,894 775,061
1.4 1.6
8. 1 9.3
29
Page 31
Appendix A TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY
1996-97 DISTRICT ANALYZE CATEGORY DESCRIPTIONS
ENROLLMENT A nine-category grouping based on the total number of students enrolled by district as of the Public Education Information Management System (PEIMS) fall collection date (late October of each year). Enrollment excludes students who are served but not enrolled by districts.
DISTRICT TYPE Classification of school districts based on factors such as size, growth rates, and proximity to urban areas is listed below. The charter school districts are in a separate category.
Major Urban. The state's largest metropolitan districts serving the Houston, Dallas, San Antonio, Fort Worth, Austin, and El Paso areas.
Major Suburban. Other districts in and around the major urban areas.
Other Central City. Major districts in other large Texas cities.
Other Central City Suburban. Other districts in and around the other large, but not major, Texas cities.
Independent Town. Largest districts in counties with populations of 25,000 to 100,000.
Non-Metro: Fast Growing. Districts not fitting in any of the above categories but exhibiting a five-year growth rate of at least 20 percent with at least 300 students enrolled.
Non-Metro: Stable. Districts not fitting in any of the above categories but with an enrollment exceeding the state median.
Rural. Districts not fitting in any of the above categories; districts either with an enrollment between 300 and the state median and a growth rate less than 20 percent, or with an enrollment less than 300.
Charter Schools. The 16 open-enrollment schools chartered by the State Board of Education for operation during 1996-97. Charter schools operate in facilities of commercial or nonprofit entities or school districts.
1996-97 'TExAS PuBLIC SCHOOL DROPOUT REPORT
Page 32
PROPERTY WEALTH Total taxable property value divided by enrollment, which indicates district ability to raise local funds on a per pupil basis. The property value used is total taxable value for the last completed calendar year-i.e., 1996, as determined by the Comptroller's Property Tax Division (CPTD). Enrollment is for the 1996-97 school year. The first wealth grouping shows 10 categories; the second simply shows districts above and below state average wealth; the third is a 20-category grouping, with each category representing about five percent of the state's students. The six special statutory and 16 charter school districts without taxable property wealth form a separate group in all three wealth groupings.
TOTAL TAX EFFORT A four-category tax effort grouping of districts defined by the total effective tax rate, which was determined by dividing the last completed calendar year's total levy amount by that year's CPTD total taxable property value. The total effective rate is the sum of the school district maintenance and operations (M&O) rate, and the interest and sinking fund standardized rate. Rates are expressed per $100 of taxable value. The six special statutory and 16 charter school districts without property tax levies appear separate! y.
MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS EFFECTIVE TAX RATES A four-category tax effort grouping of districts showing the M&O effective tax rate, which was determined by dividing the last completed calendar year's M&O levy amount by that year's CPTD total taxable property value. The M&O rates shown include the local standardized rate and money generated by districts for eqnalizing wealth. The six special statutory and 16 charter school districts without property tax levies appear separately.
HIGHEST PROPERTY VALUE CATEGORY A CPTD classification based on property use. Thirteen CPTD categories are aggregated into four categories as follows.
Residential. Single-family, multi-family, and residential inventory.
Land. Vacant lots and rural real property (taxable).
Oil and Gas. Oil, gas, and minerals.
Business. Commercial and industrial real property, commercial and industrial personal property, and utilities.
A district is placed into one of the four preceding categories that represents its greatest total property value. The six special statutory and 16 charter school districts without taxable property wealth form a separate group.
1996-97 TEXAS PuBLIC SCHOOL DROPOUT REPORT
Page 33
SMALUSPARSE ADJUSTMENT A four-category grouping of districts based on the small/sparse adjustment amount as a percent of the total adjusted basic allotment amount. A fifth category contains all districts receiving no small/sparse adjustment. This percentage represents the extent to which state funding is adjusted to compensate for small and/or sparsely populated districts.
COST OF EDUCATION INDEX LEVEL A five-category grouping of districts based on the Cost of Education Index (CEI) level. It reflects geographic variations in costs and prices outside district control. The current index, which has a minimum value of 1.0 and a maximum of 1.2, was implemented in 1991-92.
OPERATING COST PER STUDENT A five-category grouping of districts based on operating cost per student. Operating costs are the sum of all expenditures budgeted for the operation of the district for all funds. The operating expenditures are a subset of the total expenditures; they do not include debt service, capital outlay, or ancillary services expenditures. Per student amounts are the school year expenditures divided by enrollment. The source for budgeted expenditures is the fall PEIMS submission.
EDUCATION SERVICE CENTER REGION The state is divided into 20 geographic regions; districts within each region are served by an Education Service Center.
TAAS: PERCENT PASSING ALL TESTS TAKEN A five-category grouping of districts based on the percentage of students passing the Texas Assessment of Academic Skills (TAAS). For Grades 3-8 and 10, the total number of students passing all sections taken of the T AAS is expressed as a percentage of the total number of students taking one or more tests. This percentage (a) excludes special education students, and third and sixth graders taking the test in Spanish; and (b) includes only those students in the district in October of the school year, which is the percentage used for accountability purposes. A sixth category refers to districts not administering the test.
SAT I/ACT: PERCENT TAKING A three-category grouping based on the percentage of 1995-96 graduates taking the SAT I and/or the ACT assessment. A fourth category is reserved for districts that had no graduates.
SAT I/ACT: PERCENT SCORING AT OR ABOVE CRITERION A five-category grouping based on the percentage of 1995-96 examinees who scored at or above the criterion (1110 on the SAT I Total and/or 24 on the ACT Composite) on the SAT I and/or ACT. The number meeting the criterion is divided by the number of examinees. A sixth category is reserved for districts that had no examinees.
1996-97 ThxAS PUBLIC SCHOOL DROPOUT REPORT
Page 34
STUDENT DENSITY A four-category grouping based on density, or the number of students enrolled per square mile. District square miles were determined through a joint effort by the State Property Tax Board (SPTB, now the CPTD), the Texas Education Agency, and the Texas Water Commission (TWC). Maps provided by districts to the SPTB were digitized by TWC to determine acreage. The six special statutory and 16 charter school districts without available mileage information form a separate group.
ENROLLMENT CHANGE FROM PRIOR YEAR A five-category grouping based on the growth or decline in district student population over a one-year period. Districts with declining enrollment represent one category, while the remaining categories show one-year growth rates ranging from "0%-3%" to "10% and over."
PERCENT AFRICAN AMERICAN, HISPANIC, AND MINORITY STUDENTS Three six-category sets of groupings based on the ethnic composition of district student populations, as reported on PEIMS. Minority percent is calculated as the sum of all non-White populations expressed as a percentage of the total. Non-White populations include American Indian or Alaskan Native; Asian or Pacific Islander; African American, not of Hispanic origin; and Hispanic.
PERCENT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED STUDENTS A six-category grouping based on the percentage of students enrolled in the district who are classified as economically disadvantaged on PEIMS as follows:
a) eligible for free or reduced-price meals under the National School Lunch and Child Nutrition Program;
b) from a family with an annual income at/below the federal poverty line; c) eligible for AFDC or other public assistance; d) recipient of a Pell Grant or comparable state need-based financial assistance
program; or e) eligible for programs assisted under Title II of the Job Training Partnership Act.
A VERA GE TEACHER EXPERIENCE A four-category grouping of average teacher experience years computed as the total professional experience years for each district teacher multiplied by each teacher's full-time-equivalent (FfE) count, followed by summing these products for the whole district, and dividing by the total teacher FfE count.
AVERAGE TEACHER SALARY A four-category grouping by average district teacher salary computed as the total salary of teachers divided by the total teacher FfE count. Total salary amount does not include any other supplement.
1996-97 TEXAS PUBLIC SCHOOL DROPOUT REPORT
Page 35
PERCENT MINORITY TEACHERS A six-category grouping based on the minority composition of district teaching populations. Minority percentage is calculated by summing all non-White teacher FrEs and dividing by the total teacher FrEs.
PERCENT TEACHERS WITH ADVANCED DEGREES A four-category grouping by district percentage of teachers with advanced degrees computed as the FrE count of teachers with a master's or doctoral degree divided by the total teacher FrE count.
1996-97 TEXAS Ptmuc SCHOOL DROPOUT REPORT
Page 37
AppendixB 1996-97 Total Dropout Rate and Estimated
Longitudinal Rate by County, District, and Campus
1996-97 TEXAS PUBLIC SCHOOL DROPOUT REPORT
APPENDIX B 1996-97 CAMPUS DETAIL BY DISTRICT
DROPOUT RATES BY ETHNICITY, ANNUAL DROPOUT RATE, ANO ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
COUNTY DISTRICT
ANDERSON CAYUGA ISO
ELKHART ISD
FRANKSTON ISO
NECHES ISO
PALESTINE ISO
SLOCUM ISO
WESlWOOD ISO
ANDREWS ANDREWS ISO
ANGELINA CENTRAL ISO
DIBOLL ISO
HUDSON ISO
HUNTINGTON ISO
LUFKIN ISO
ZAVALLA ISO
ARANSAS ARANSAS COUNTY
CAMPUS
WHITE DROPOUT
RATE
AFR. AM DROPOUT
RATE
HISP DROPOUT
RATE
ECON DIS DROPOUT
RATE
1996-97 TOTAL
DROPOUTS
1996-97 7-12
ENROLLMENT
1996-97 DROPOUT
RATE
ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
CAYUGA H S NEW MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
1 1 0
328 227 101
1.0 0.3 0.4 0.0
5.9 1.8 2.6 0.0
ELKHART H S ELKHART MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
4 4 0
532 339 193
0.8 1.2 0.0
4.4 6.9 0.0
FRANKSTON FRANKSTON
H S MIDDLE
2.0 3.3 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
1.8 3.8 0.0
7 7 0
393 244 149
1.8 2.9 0.0
10.2 16.0 0.0
NECHES H S 158 158
0.6 0.6
3.7 3.7
DAYTOP CAMPUS PALESTINE H S PALESTINE MIDDLE
0.0
0.0
o.o
o.o
o.o
0.0
o.o
o.o
3 0 3 0
1, 776 119
1, 100 676
0.2 0.0 0.3 0.0
1.0 0.0 1.6 0.0
SLOCUM H S 4.2 4.2
11.1 11.1
0.0 0.0
4.6 4.6
9 9
205 205
4.4 4.4
23.6 23.6
WESTWOOD H S WESlWOOD J H
1.4 2.2 0.0
2.8 4.2 0.0
6.1 11. 1 0.0
0.6 1. 5 0.0
17 17
0
918 582 342
1.9 2.9 0.0
10.6 16.3 0.0
ANDREWS ANDREWS
H S MIDDLE
0.6 0.9
0.0 0.0
2.3 3.6
1.4 2.5
22 21
1
1,712 1,04B
664
1.3 1.3 2.0 0.2
7.5 7.5
11.4 0.9
CENTRAL H S CENTRAL J H STUBBLEFIELD LRN CTR
1.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.6
0.0
7 4 0 3
732 445 274
34
1.9 1.0 0.9 0.0 8.8
11.0 5.6 5.3 0.0
42.6
DIBOLL H S DIBOLL J H
1.2 1.1 0.0
1.8 2.0 0.0
2.7 3.2 0.0
1.6 2.6 0.0
17 12
0
908 592 291
1.9 2.0 0.0
10.7 11.6 0.0
HUDSON H S HUDSON J H STUBBLEFIELD LRN CT
1.6 1.4
17.2
4.3 5.9
0.0
2.5 1.7
7.7
2.1 3.2
11. 1
18 10
2 6
1,014 635 356
43
1.8 1.6 0.6
14.0
10.2 9.1 3.3
59.4
HUNTINGTON H S HUNTINGTON INT HUNTINGTON MIDDLE PRIDE ALTER SCH
4.4 0.9
0.0
6.8 2.9
0.0
13.0 0.0
0.0
4.3 0.7
0.0
44 5
0
933 475
280
4.7 1.1
0.0
25.2 6.2
0.0
HACKNEY SP ED JUVENILE DETENT CTR LUFKIN DUNBAR INT LUFKIN EAST J H LUFKIN H S LUFKIN WEST J H STATE SCHOOL STUBBLEFIELD LRN CTR
0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0
1.5
0.0
2.3 0.0 0.0 0.0
4.1
0.0
2.2 0.0 0.0 0.0
5.0
0.0
1.4 0.0 0.0 0.0
3.1
0.0
58 0 0 0 4
51 2 0 1
4, 132 18
142 642 773
1,824 682
8 196
1.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 2.8 0.3 0.0 0.5
8.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.1
15.7 1.8 0.0 3.0
ZAVALLA H S 2.4 0.0 0.0 4.9 5
4 215 213
2.3 1. 9
13.2 10.B
ROCKPORT-FULTON H s ROCKPORT-FULTON J H
1.4 2.3 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
2.8 4.4 0.0
2.0 3.6 0.0
30 30
0
1,715 1,103
612
1.7 1.7 2.7 0.0
10.1 10.1 15.3 0.0
NOTE: A DASH {-) INDICATES DATA ARE NOT REPORTED TO PROTECT STUDENT ANONYMITY.
39
APPENDIX B 1996-97 CAMPUS DETAIL BY DISTRICT
DROPOUT RATES BY ETHNICITY, ANNUAL DROPOUT RATE, AND ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
COUNTY
ARCHER
ARMSTRONG
ATASCOSA
AUSTIN
BAILEY
BANDERA
DISTRICT
ARCHER CITY ISD
HOLLIDAY ISO
MEGARGEL ISD
WINDTHORST ISD
CLAUDE ISD
CHARLOTTE ISD
JOURDANTON ISD
LYTLE ISD
PLEASANTON ISD
POTEET ISD
BELLVILLE ISO
SEALY ISO
WALLIS-ORCHARD
MULESHOE ISO
THREE WAY ISO
BANDERA ISO
CAMPUS
WHITE DROPOUT
RATE
AFR. AM DROPOUT
RATE
HISP DROPOUT
RATE
ECON DIS DROPOUT
RATE
1996-97 TOTAL
DROPOUTS
ARCHER CITY H S 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0 0 0 0
0.0 0.0
0 0
HOLLIDAY H S HOLLIDAY MIDDLE 0.0 0 0 0 0 0.0
2 2 0
MEGARGEL H S 0.0 0.0
0 0
0 0
0 0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0 0
WINDTHORST H S 0.0 0.0
0,0 0.0
0 0
0 0
0.0 0.0
0 0
CLAUDE H S 2.4 2.4
100 0 100 0
0 0
0 0
0.0 0.0
6 6
CHARLOTTE H S CHARLOTTE J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
1 1 0
BIGFOOT ALTER SCH JOURDANTON H S JOURDANTON J H
0.0
0.0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2 0 2 0
ATASCOSA CO JUVENIL LYTLE H S LYTLE MIDDLE
2.0 0.0 3.0 0.0
0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0
3 2 0 0 5.0 0.0
0.6 0.0 1.0 0.0
17 0
17 0
BIGFOOT ALTER H S CT BIGFOOT ALTER J H C PLEASANTON H S PLEASANTON J H
1.0
0.0 1.4 0.0
0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
1. 6
0.0 2.5 0.0
1.2
0.0 1. 7 0.0
25 2 0
23 0
A C E S ATASCOSA CO POTEET H S POTEET J H
JUVENIL
1.3 22.2 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
3.3 23.2 0.0 1.2 0.0
1.9 19.0 0.0 0.4 0.0
23 16
0 5 0
BELLVILLE H S BELLVILLE J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0
4 4 0
SEALY H S SEALY J H
0.7 1. 1 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
3.7 5.9 0.0
1 .9 3 3 0 0
14 14
0
BRAZOS H S BRAZOS MIDDLE
1 .0 1 .5 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
4.6 6.6 0.0
.9 3.2 0.0
6
0
MULESHOE WATSON J
H S H
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
4.4 2.7 0.0
2.9 2.6 0.0
16 6 0
THREE WAY SCHOOL 0.0 0.0
0 0
0 0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0 0
BANDERA H S BANDERA J H
0.5 0.6
0.0 0.0
2.2 2.5
1.2 2.2
6 7 1
1996·97 7-12
ENROLLMENT
305 305
494 306 166
66 66
172 172
216 216
240 161
79
577 25
367 206
615 7
396 216
1, 715 29 26
1J148 566
799 76 10
499 265
1,039 643 396
1 ,061 706 353
469 311 156
735 445 290
65 65
1 ,033 653 360
1996-97 DROPOUT
RATE
0.2 0.0 0.0
0 .4 0.6 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
2.6 2.6 2.6
1. 7 0.4 0,6 0.0
0.3 0.0 0.5 0.0
2 6 0 0 4.3 0.0
1.5 6.9 0.0 2.0 0.0
2 9 23.1
0 0 1. 0 0 0
1 .0 0 4 0 6 0 0
1. 3 2.0 0.0
1 .7 2 6 0.0
2.3 2.4 1.3 o.o
0.0 0.0
0.7 0.6 1.1 0.3
ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
1.2 0 0 0 0
2.4 3.6 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
15.4 15.4 15.4
10 0 2.5 3 7 0 0
2. 1 0 0 3.2 0.0
15.5 0.0
23.0 0,0
6.4 34.9 0.0
11.4 0.0
16.1 79.3 0.0 5.9 0.0
6.0 2.3 3.7 0.0
7.7 11.3 0.0
9.6 14.5 0,0
12 6 13 6
7 6 0 0
0 0 0 0
4.3 4.6 6.3 1.6
NOTE: A DASH (-) INDICATES DATA ARE NOT REPORTED TO PROTECT STUDENT ANONYMITY.
40
APPENDIX B 1996-97 CAMPUS DETAIL BY DISTRICT
DROPOUT RATES BY ETHNICITY, ANNUAL DROPOUT RATE, ANO ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
COUNTY
BANDERA
BASTROP
BAYLOR
BEE
BELL
DISTRICT
MEDINA ISO
BASTROP ISO
ELGIN ISO
SMITHVILLE ISO
SEYMOUR ISO
BEEVILLE ISO
PAWNEE ISO
PETIUS ISO
SKIDMORE- TYNAN
ACADEMY ISO
BARTLETT ISO
BELTON ISO
HOLLAND ISO
KILLEEN ISO
CAMPUS
WHITE DROPOUT
RATE
AFR. AM DROPOUT
RATE
HISP DROPOUT
RATE
ECON DIS DROPOUT
RATE
1996-97 TOTAL
DROPOUTS
1996-97 7-12
ENROLLMENT
1996-97 DROPOUT
RATE
ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
MEDINA H S 203 203
0.5 0.5
2.9 2.9
BASTROP H S BASTROP MIDDLE EMILE EL GATEWAY SCH GENESIS H S PINE STREET ALTER
1.6 1.3 0.6 0.0 0.0 11.4 o.o
1.5 0.7 1. 8 0.0 0.0 9.1 0.0
1. 7 2.0 o.o 0.0 0.0 14,8 0.0
1.8 2.7 0.5 o.o o.o 10.0 o.o
43 22
6 0 0
15 0
2,707 1 ,557 1,023
6 133 127
37
1.4 1.6 1.4 0.6 0.0 0.0
11.8 0.0
8.3 9.2 8.2 3.5 0.0 0.0
53.0 0.0
B T WASHINGTON MIOD ELGIN H S PHOENIX LRN CTR
1. 1 0.0 1.0 11.1
0.5 0.0 0.8 o.o
2.1 0.0 2.6 8.3
0.9 o.o 1.3 4.5
17 0
12 5
1,294 454 802
60
1.3 0.0 1.5 8.3
7.6 0.0 8.7
40.7
ALTER SCH SMITHVILLE H S SMITiiVILLE J H
1.3 0.0 2.0 0.0
0.9 0.0 1.4 0.0
0.6 0.0 1.3 0.0
1. 1 o.o 2.1 o.o
9 0 9 0
824 30
502 299
1.1 0.0 1.8 0.0
6.4 0.0
10.3 0.0
SEYMOUR H S 2 2
388 388
0.5 0.5 0.5
3.1 3.1 3.1
CONOLY ALTER JONES H S MORENO J H
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.4 o.o 0.7 0.0
0.4 o.o 0.6 o.o
6 0 6 0
2, 182 96
1,392 777
0.2 0.3 0.0 0.4 0.0
1.5 1. 6 0.0 2.6 0.0
PAWNEE EL-J H 0.0 o.o
0.0 0.0
o.o 0.0
o.o o.o
0 0
38 38
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
PETIUS H S 278 278
0.4 0.4
2.1 2.1
SKIDMORE-TYNAN H S SKIDMORE-TYNAN J H
o.o 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
o.o o.o o.o
0 0 0
388 242 147
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
ACADEMY H s ACADEMY J H
0.0 o.o 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
o.o 0.0 0.0
o.o o.o o.o
0 0 0
510 321 189
0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0
4.4 0.0 0.0 o.o
BARTLETI H S BARTLETI MIDDLE
0.0 0.0 0.0
2.8 4.5 0.0
7.1 10.7 0.0
2.0 3.4 o.o
7 7 0
254 162
93
2.8 4.3 0.0
15.4 23.3 0.0
BELTON H S BELTON J H
0.2 0.7 0.2 0.3 6 4 2
3,045 1,912 1, 133
0.2 0.2 0.2
1.2 t.3 1.0
BOWMAN MIDDLE HOLLAND H S
0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o 4 0 4
276 94
182
1.4 0.0 2.2
8.4 0.0
12.5
CEDAR CREST ALTER CVGA FROG EASTERN HILLS MIDDLE ELLISON H S ELLISON NINTH GR CT FAIRWAY MIDDLE KILLEEN ALTER CTR H KILLEEN H S KILLEEN NINTH GR CT MANOR MIDDLE
0.8
5.8
0.3 0.3
2.3 1.4 1.2 0.0
1.2
7.8
0.7 0.5
6.0 2.2 0.0 0.0
1.5
9.3
0.7 1.6
2.4 1.9 2.4 0.0
1.0
6.2
1.2 0.8
3.8 1.5 0.8 o.o
123 3
18 2
14 6 4 9
44 9 0
11,595 53
196 700
2,520 1,019
635 207
2,585 1,028
698
1. 1 5.7 9.2 0.3 0.6 0.6 0.6 4.3 1. 7 0.9 o.o
6.2 29.5 43.9
1. 7 3.3 3.5 3. 7
23.4 9.8 5.1 0.0
NOTE: A DASH (-) INDICATES DATA ARE NOT REPORTED TO PROTECT STUDENT ANONYMITY.
41
APPENDIX B 1996-97 CAMPUS DETAIL BY DISTRICT
DROPOUT RATES BY ETHNICITY, ANNUAL DROPOUT RATE, AND ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
COUNTY
BELL
BEXAR
DISTRICT
KILLEEN ISO
ROGERS ISO
SALADO ISO
TEMPLE ISO
TROY ISO
ALAMO HEIGHTS I
BLESSED SACRAME
BUILDING ALTERN
EAST CENTRAL IS
EDGEWOOD ISO
FT SAM HOUSTON
HARLANDALE ISO
JUDSON ISO
WHITE AFR. AM HISP ECON DIS 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 ESTIMATED DROPOUT DROPOUT DROPOUT DROPOUT TOTAL 7-12 DROPOUT LONGITUDINAL
CAMPUS RATE RATE RATE RATE DROPOUTS ENROLLMENT RATE DROPOUT RATE
METROPLEX HOSPITAL 3 69 4.3 23.4 MIDDLE LEVEL LAN CT 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 192 0.0 0.0
NOLAN MIDDLE 0.0 0.6 2.4 0.8 5 634 0.8 4.6
PALO AL TO MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 567 0.0 0.0
RANGIER MIDDLE 4 720 0.6 3.3
SMITH MIDDLE 0.0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 613 o.o 0.0
4 424 0. 9 5 5
ROGERS H s 4 285 1.4 8. 1
ROGERS J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 140 0.0 0 0
3 415 0.7 4.3
SALADO H s 3 415 0.7 4 .3
0.0 0.3 0.5 0.3 8 3,B47 0 2 1.2
BONHAM MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 486 0. 0 0.0
LAMAR MIDDLE SOUTHLAND VILLA TEMPLE H S 0.1 0 4 0 6 0.5 6 2,367 0.3 1 .5
TRAVIS MIDDLE 0.0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 593 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 602 0 0 0.0
TROY H S 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 392 0 0 0.0
TROY MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 210 0 0 0.0
1.8 10.2 0.1 2 0 0.6 0.4 6 2,066 0.3 1. 7
ALAMO HEIGHTS H S 0.2 2 8 1 .0 0.7 6 1,346 0.4 2.6
ALAMO HEIGHTS J H 0.0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 720 0.0 0.0
28.6 20.0 24 2 25.0 62 255 24.3 81 . 2 SECOND CHANCE H s 28.6 20.0 24.2 25.0 62 255 24.3 81 .2
0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 235 0.0 0.0 BUILDING ALTER CHAR 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 235 0.0 0.0
1.1 0 9 2.1 1 .7 50 3,462 1.4 8 4 BEXAR CO J J A E p 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 17 0.0 0 0 EAST CENTRAL H S 1.5 1 .0 3.0 2 7 42 2, 177 1.9 11 .0 OAK CREST MIDDLE 0.8 0 0 1.1 0.9 5 600 0.8 4 9 SALADO MIDDLE 3 692 0.4 2 .6
2.1 2.4 4 6 3.2 272 6,023 4.5 24 .2 ACCELERATED LAN SCH 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 109 0.0 0.0 BEXAR CO J J A E P 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 35 0.0 0.0 BRENTI'JOOD MIDDLE 3 633 0.5 2.8 COMPETENCY BASED H 33.3 0 0 30.1 25.6 73 243 30.0 88.3 E T WRENN J H 0.0 3 .7 0.9 0.7 6 580 1.0 6.1 GUS GARCIA J H 0.0 0.0 1.8 1. 7 13 718 1. 8 10.4 KENNEDY H S 0.0 0.0 5.0 3.7 87 1,827 4.8 25 4 MEMORIAL H S 5.9 4 7 5 0 4 0 84 1,677 5.0 26 5 TRUMAN MIDDLE 0.0 0 0 1.4 1 .5 6 441 1.4 7 9
534 0.2 1.1 COLE H S 1 528 0.2 1.1 SP ED OFF-CAMPUS 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0.0 0.0
0.7 2 4 0.5 0 4 35 6,880 0.5 3.0 A LEAL JR MIDDLE 1 640 0.2 0.9 ALTER CTR 2 339 0.6 3.5 BEXAR CO J J A E p COLUMBIA HEIGHTS EL HARLANDALE ACAD 1 136 0.7 4.3 HARLANDALE H S 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.7 16 2,221 0.7 4.3 HARLANDALE MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 805 0.0 0.0 KINGSBOROUGH MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 573 0.0 0.0 MCCOLLUM H S 1.5 5.3 0.6 0.4 15 1,941 0.8 4.6 POSITIVE SOLUTIONS 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 112 0.0 0.0 TERRELL WELLS MIDDL 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 673 0.0 0.0
1 .6 1.7 2.0 1. 7 128 7,317 1. 7 10.1 ALTER SCH 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 270 0.0 0.0 BEXAR CO J J A E P 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 21 0.0 0.0 JUDSON H S 2.3 2.7 3.1 3.3 118 4,442 2.7 14.9
NOTE: A DASH (-) INDICATES DATA ARE NOT REPORTED TO PROTECT STUDENT ANONYMITY.
42
APPENDIX B
1996-97 CAMPUS DETAIL BY DISTRICT
DROPOUT RATES BY ETHNICITY, ANNUAL DROPOUT RATE, AND ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
WHITE AFR. AM HISP ECON DIS 1996-97 1996-97 1996·97 ESTIMATED DROPOUT DROPOUT DROPOUT DROPOUT TOTAL 7-12 DROPOUT LONGITUDINAL
COUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS RATE RATE RATE RATE DROPOUTS ENROLLMENT RATE DROPOUT RATE
BEXAR JUDSON ISO JUDSON LEARNING ACA 7.3 0.0 5.3 o.o 6 109 5.5 28.8
KIRBY J H 0.0 0.0 o.o 0.0 0 721 o.o 0.0 KITTY HAWK J H 2 1,032 0.2 1.2 MIDDLE SCHOOL 2 1,027 0.2 1.2 THOMPSON CTR 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 45 o.o o.o
LACKLAND ISO 0.0 o.o 0.0 o.o 0 311 o.o o.o LACKLAND JR/SR H S 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o 0 311 o.o o.o
NORTH EAST ISO 0.9 1.2 1. 7 1.3 264 22,324 1.2 6.9 ACADEMY OF CREATIVE 7.5 0.0 12.0 10.8 25 306 8.2 40.0
AlTER MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 139 o.o o.o ALTER SCH o.o 0.0 o.o 0.0 0 135 o.o o.o BRADLEY MIDDLE o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 804 o.o o.o CENTER SCH 6.1 7 .7 6.1 7.7 14 227 6.2 3t.8
CHURCHILL H S 0.9 3.4 2.2 2.5 36 3,097 1.2 6.8 DRISCOLL MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o 0 1,255 o.o o.o EISENHOWER MIDDLE 1 1,014 0.1 0.6 GARNER MIDDLE 0.0 o.o 0.0 o.o 0 988 o.o o.o HOMEBASED COMP ED 1 81 1.2 7.2 HOMEBOUND 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o 0 339 o.o o.o JACKSON MIDDLE 1 821 0.1 0.7 KRUEGER MIDDLE 0.0 o.o 0.0 0.0 0 746 o.o 0.0 LEE H S 1.3 o.o 2.4 2.4 53 2,761 1.9 11.0
MAC ARTHUR H S 0.9 1.2 2.2 2.0 40 3,019 1.3 7.7 MADISON H S 1.5 1.2 1.3 1.0 40 2,897 1.4 8.0 NIMITZ MIDDLE 3 671 0.4 2 .7 NORTH EAST J J A E p 2 62 3.2 17.9 ROOSEVELT H S 1.2 2.1 3.0 2.4 47 2,202 2.1 12.1
TRANSITIONS SCH 1 42 2.4 13.5
WHITE MIDDLE o.o 0.0 o.o 0.0 0 775 o.o 0.0 WOOD MIDDLE o.o 0.0 o.o 0.0 0 912 o.o o.o
NORTHSIOE ISO 1.1 1.4 2.2 1.7 471 28,698 1.6 9.5 AlTER SCH 0.5 0.0 0.8 0.0 5 798 0.6 3.7 ANSON JONES MIDDLE 0.0 o.o 1. 1 0.7 8 933 0.9 5.0 BAPTIST CHILDREN'S 0.0 o.o 0.0 o.o 0 67 o.o o.o BEXARCOJJAEP 11.1 0.0 5.4 4.0 5 85 5.9 30.5
CHALLENGE H S 7 .1 8.3 11. 7 5.7 45 451 10.0 46.8
CHARTER REAL HOSPITA 1 191 0.5 3.1 COKE STEVENSON MIDDL 4 1,088 0.4 2.2 COM GUID CTR 1 15 6.7 33.9
COMP ED HOMEBOUND 0.0 o.o 0.0 0.0 0 110 o.o o.o E M PEASE MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o 0 646 o.o o.o EARL RUDDER MIDDLE 1 986 0.1 o.6 H B ZACHRY MIDDLE 0.6 o.o 0.3 0.5 5 1,161 0.4 2.6 HEALTH CAREERS H S 0.0 o.o 0.0 0.0 0 923 o.o o.o HOLMES H S 2.3 2.3 2.5 2.4 87 3,623 2.4 13.6 HOLMGREEN JR-SR H S 1 182 0.5 3.3 HOMEBOUND 2 118 1. 7 9.8 JACK C JORDAN MIDDLE 2 1,032 0.2 1.2 JAY HS 2.0 1.3 3.3 3.1 90 3,248 2.8 15.5 MARSHALL H S 1.5 2.4 2.9 3.5 65 3,234 2.0 11 .5 MEDICAL CENTER HOSP! 1 15 6.7 33.9
NEFF MIDDLE 2 841 0.2 1.4 NEW DAY HOSPITAL 1 13 7.7 38.1
NORTHSIOE HABILITAT 0.0 o.o 0.0 o.o 0 6 o.o o.o RAYBURN MIDDLE 4 655 0.6 3.6 SAFE AND DRUG FREE S 2 123 1.6 9.4 SOUTHWEST NEUROPSYCH 1 200 0.5 3.0 SP ED NIGHT SCH 5.5 11.B 10.2 t 1.5 15 162 9.3 44.2 STINSON MIDDLE 0.3 2.1 0.6 0.6 5 1,060 0.5 2.8 SUL ROSS MIDDLE o.o 0.0 0.7 0.0 5 820 0.6 3.6 SUNSET H S 4.2 16.7 5.6 5.9 B 149 5.4 28.2
TEXAS KEY PROG 1 31 3.2 17 .9
TOM CLARK H S 1.2 2.1 2.6 2.5 58 3,342 1. 7 10.0 VILLA ROSA 1 72 1.4 8.1 voe TRANSITION PROG 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 142 o.o 0.0 WILLIAM H TAFT H S 0.7 0.6 2.0 1.1 43 3,566 1.2 7.0 WILLIAM HOBBY MIDDLE 2 1,003 0.2 1.2
NOTE: A DASH (-) INDICATES DATA ARE NOT REPORTED TO PROTECT STUDENT ANONYMITY.
43
APPENDIX B 1996-97 CAMPUS DETAIL BY DISTRICT
DROPOUT RATES BY ETHNICITY, ANNUAL DROPOUT RATE, AND ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
WHITE AFR. AM HISP ECON DIS 1996-97 1996-97 DROPOUT DROPOUT DROPOUT DROPOUT TOTAL 7-12
COUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS RATE RATE RATE RATE DROPOUTS ENROLLMENT
BEXAR RANDOLPH FIE LO 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 405 RANDOLPH H S 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 243 RANDOLPH MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 162
SAN ANTONIO ISO 1.3 1.4 1.6 1 .0 442 27,B64 ADELANTE ACAO 0.0 0.0 16.4 8.5 22 142 ALAMO ACHIEVEMENT CT 4 115 BATTERED WOMEN'S SHE BOYS TOWN 2.2 2 9 5.6 0.0 6 151 BRACKENRIDGE H S 0.8 1 .0 1. 7 1.0 39 2,514 BURBANK H S 0.0 0 0 0.6 0.3 10 1,679 CHILDREN'S COMPREHE 0.0 o.o 0.0 0.0 0 45 CONNELL MIDDLE 2 565 COOPER MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 1.5 0.5 7 486 DAVIS MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 785 EDISON H S 1.1 0.0 2.5 1.1 48 2,016 FOX TECHNICAL H s 2.6 0.0 1.3 0.9 23 1,B86 HARRIS MIDDLE 4 517 HEALY-MURPHY 14.3 20.5 12.3 12.6 28 198 HIGHLANDS H S 1. 2 1.2 2.0 1. 7 46 2,508 HOMEBOUND 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 49 HOUSTON H S 0.0 1.6 3.4 1. 1 31 1,516 IRVING MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 774 JEFFERSON H S 2.3 1.5 1.7 1.0 42 2,470 JUVENILE DETENT CTR 0.0 2.1 1. 6 1. 1 22 1,518 LANIER H S 0.0 0.0 2.1 1.4 40 1,972 LONGFELLOW MIDDLE 2 728 LOWELL MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 441 M L KING MIDDLE 0.0 1 .3 1.2 0.8 5 412 MANN MIDDLE 1 603 NAVARRO ACHIEVEMENT 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 465 PAGE MIDDLE 0.0 2.4 0.9 0.8 7 747 POE MIDDLE 2 659 RHODES MIDDLE 4 441 ROGERS MIDDLE 1 717 SW MENTAL HEALTH CT 1 80 SALVATION ARMY 3 21 SAN ANTONIO ST HOSPI 3 120 SAN ANTONIO ST SCH SANTA ROSA 0.0 o.o 0.0 0.0 0 18 SCHOOL OF THE COMMU 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 6 TAFOLLA MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.7 11 938 THE BRIDGE 5.2 4.8 3.8 4.2 11 261 TWAIN MIDDLE 3.2 0.0 0.6 0.5 5 768 WHEATLEY MIDDLE 9.1 0.0 1.7 1.0 7 551 WHITTIER MIDDLE 3 735
SOMERSET ISO 1. 1 0.0 1.8 1.8 17 1 ,057 ATASCOSA CO ALTER 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 5 BEXAR CO J J A E P 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 8 SOMERSET H S 1. 7 0.0 2.8 2.9 15 613 SOMERSET MIDDLE 2 448
SOUTH SAN ANTON 1.3 0.0 3.6 2.6 163 4,833 ABRAHAM KAZEN MIDDLE 1 605 ALAN B SHEPARD MIDDL 2 481 ALTER SCH 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 97 BEXARCOJJAEP 0.0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 6 COMPETENCY BASED H 25.0 0 0 10.8 8.0 21 192 DWIGHT MIDDLE/SP ED SO SAN ANTONIO H S
0.0 0.0
0 0 0 0
1 .6 3.1
1.4 2.5
12 21
752 827
SOUTH SAN ANTONIO H 2.0 0 0 5.2 3.8 106 2,097
SOUTHSIDE ISO 1. 5 0.0 2.9 2.0 43 1,645 SOUTHSIDE ALTER CTR 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 86 SOUTHSIDE H S 2.4 0.0 4.7 3.5 43 1,OOB SOUTHSIDE MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 635
SOUTHWEST ISO 0. 7 0.5 1.2 1. 1 45 4,283 MULTI-DISTRICT SCH 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 73 RONALD E MCNAIR MID 0.0 2.3 1 .4 0.6 9 800 SHARON CHRISTA MCAUL 3 862 SOUTHWEST ENRICHMEN 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 114 SOUTHWEST H S 1.0 0.0 1 .4 1. 7 32 2,484
1996-97 DROPOUT
RATE
0.0 0.0 0.0
1. 6 15.5 3.5
4.0 1.6 0.6 0.0 0.4 1.4 0.0 2.4 1.2 0.8
14. 1 1.8 0.0 2.0 0.0 1. 7 1.4 2.0 0.3 0.0 1.2 0.2 0.0 0.9 0.3 0.9 0.1 1.3
14.3 2.5
0.0 0.0 1.2 4.2 0.7 1. 3 0.4
1.6 0.0 0.0 2.4 0.4
3.4 0.2 0.4 0.0 0.0
10.9 1.6 2.5 5.1
2.6 0.0 4.3 0.0
1.1 0.0 1.1 0.3 0.0 1. 3
ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
0.0 0.0 0.0
9.2 63.6 19.1
21.6 9.0 3.5 0.0 2.1 8.3 0.0
13.5 7 .1 4.6
59.9 10.5 0.0
11. 7 0.0 9.8 8.4
11. 6 1. 6 0.0 7.1 1. 0 0.0 5.5 1. 8 5.3 0.8 7.3
60.3 14. 1
0.0 0.0 6.8
22.8 3.8 7.4 2.4
9.3 0.0 0.0
13.8 2.7
18.6 1.0 2.5 0.0 0.0
50.1 9.2
14.3 26.8
14. 7 0.0
23.0 0.0
6.1 0.0 6.6 2.1 0.0 7.5
NOTE: A DASH (-) INDICATES DATA ARE NOT REPORTED TO PROTECT STUDENT ANONYMITY.
44
APPENDIX B
1996-97 CAMPUS DETAIL BY DISTRICT
DROPOUT RATES BY ETHNICITY, ANNUAL DROPOUT RATE, AND ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
COUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS
WHITE DROPOUT
RATE
AFR. AM DROPOUT
RATE
HISP DROPOUT
RATE
ECON DIS ORO POUT
RATE
1996-97 TOTAL
DROPOUTS
1996-97 7-12
ENROLLMENT
1996-97 DROPOUT
RATE
ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
BLANCO BLANCO ISO
BLANCO H S BLANCO MIDDLE
1.8 2.8 o.o
0.0 0.0 0.0
1. 0 1.9 0.0
1.4 2.4 0.0
7 7 0
444 273 171
1.2 1.6 2.6 0.0
6.8 9.1
14.4 0.0
JOHNSON CITY IS LYNDON B JOHNSON H S LYNDON B JOHNSON MI o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0
2 2 0
324 207 117
0.6 1.0 0.0
3. 7 5.7 o.o
BORDEN BORDEN COUNTY I
BORDEN SCHOOL 0.0 o.o
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0 0
114 114
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
BOSQUE CLIFTON ISO
CLIFTON H S CLIFTON MIDDLE o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0
3 3 0
599 400 199
0.3 0.5 0.8 0.0
1.8 3.0 4.4 0.0
CRANFILLS GAP CRANFILLS GAP SCHOO
o.o o.o
0.0 o.o
o.o 0.0
0.0 0.0
0 0
78 78
0.0 o.o
0.0 0.0
IREDELL ISO IREDELL SCHOOL
o.o o.o
o.o o.o
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0 0
61 61
o.o o.o
0.0 0.0
KOPPERL ISO KOPPERL SCHOOL
o.o o.o
0.0 0.0
0.0 o.o
0.0 0.0
0 0
171 171
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
MERIDIAN ISO MERIDIAN H S
o.o o.o
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
o.o o.o
0 0
262 262
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
MORGAN ISO MORGAN SCHOOL
o.o o.o
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0 0
99 99
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
VALLEY MILLS IS VALLEY MILLS H s
o.o o.o
0.0 0.0
o.o 0.0
0.0 0.0
0 0
269 165
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
WALNUT SPRINGS WALNUT SPRINGS SCHOO
2 2
104 104
1.9 1.9
11.0 11 .0
BOWIE DEKALB ISO
DEKALB H S DEKALB MIDDLE
o.o o.o o.o
0.0 0.0 0.0
o.o 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
0 0 0
538 357 182
1.8 0.0 o.o 0.0
10.1 0.0 0.0 0.0
HOOKS ISO HOOKS H S HOOKS J H
2.1 3.1 o.o
1. 7 2.2 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
2.3 3.9 o.o
13 13
0
648 448 200
2.0 2.9 0.0
11 .s 16.2 0.0
HUBBARD ISO HUBBARD EL
o.o o.o
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 o.o
0 0
13 13
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
LEARY ISO LEARY El
o.o o.o
0.0 0.0
o.o 0.0
0.0 0.0
0 0
26 26
o.o 0.0
0.0 0.0
LIBERTY-EYLAU ALTER SCH LIBERTY- EYLAU H S LIBERTY- EYLAU MIDDLE
0.9
0.7
0.9
1.1
0.0
0.0
0.4
0.0
12 2 7 3
1,339 121 802 454
0.9 1.7 0.9 0.7
5.3 9.5 5.1 3.9
MALTA ISO MALTA El
o.o o.o
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0 0
16 18
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
MAUD ISO MAUD SCHOOL
1.1 1.1
9.3 9.3
0.0 0.0
2.5 2.5
6 6
236 236
2.5 2.5
14.3 14.3
NEW BOSTON ISO NEW BOSTON H S NEW BOSTON J H
o.5 o.7 o.o
1. 1 1. 7 0.0
0.0 0.0 o.o
0.4 0.7 0.0
5 5 0
792 539 253
0.6 0.9 0.0
3. 7 5.4 0.0
PLEASANT GROVE PLEASANT GROVE H s
o.o o.o
0.0 0.0
o.o 0.0
0.0 0.0
0 0
932 596
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
NOTE: A DASH (·) INDICATES DATA ARE NOT REPORTED TO PROTECT STUDENT ANONYMITY.
45
APPENDIX B 1996-97 CAMPUS DETAIL BY DISTRICT
DROPOUT RATES BY ETHNICITY, ANNUAL DROPOUT RATE, AND ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
COUNTY
BOWIE
BRAZORIA
BRAZOS
DISTRICT
PLEASANT GROVE
RED LICK ISO
REDWATER !SD
SIMMS ISD
TEXARKANA ISO
ALVIN ISD
ANGLETON ISO
BRAZOSPORT ISD
COLUMBIA-BRAZOR
DAMJN ISO
DANBURY ISD
PEARLAND ISO
SWEENY ISO
BRYAN ISD
WHITE AFR. AM HISP ECON DIS 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 ESTIMATED DROPOUT DROPOUT DROPOUT DROPOUT TOTAL 7-12 DROPOUT LONGITUDINAL
CAMPUS RATE RATE RATE RATE DROPOUTS ENROLLMENT RATE DROPOUT RATE
PLEASANT GROVE MIDD 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 336 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 64 0.0 0.0 RED LICK MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 64 0.0 0.0
0.7 8.0 0.0 3.3 6 593 1.0 5 9 REDWATER HS 0.8 10.0 0.0 6.3 5 399 1.3 7 3 REDWATER J H 1 194 0.5 3. 1
2.D 0.0 50.0 0.0 7 262 2.7 15.0 JAMES BOWIE H s 2.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 7 262 2.7 15.0
2.9 3.9 6.8 3.2 87 2,521 3.5 19.0 HIGHLAND PARK El LINCOLN STREET ALTE 7.5 10.6 0.0 9.5 14 146 9.6 45.4 NUNN JUVENILE COURT 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 29 O.D 0.0 PINE STREET MIDDLE 2 816 0.2 1.5 TEXAS H S 3.6 4.9 9.3 4.4 71 1,631 4.4 23.4 WESTLAWN INT
0.7 4.3 0.9 0.0 1.4 0.8 52 5, 141 1.0 5.9
ALVIN EVENING SCH 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 7 0.0 0.0 ALVIN H S 1.5 0.0 2.2 1.4 51 3,176 1.8 9.3 ALVIN J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 816 0.0 0.0 ASSETS LEARNING CTil 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 62 0.0 0.0 DAY STAR RESIDENTIA 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 89 0.0 0.0 GWHARBYJH 1 740 0.1 0.8 MANVEL J H o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 297 0.0 0.0
0.4 0.7 0.5 0.4 15 3,250 0.5 2.7
ANGLETON H S 0.6 1. 1 0.9 0.8 14 1 ,939 0.7 4.3 ANGLETON MIDDLE-EAS 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 624 0.0 0.0 ANGLETON MIDDLE-WES 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 528 0.0 0.0 BRAZORIA CO ALTER ED 1 242 0.4 2.5 NORTHSIDE EL STUDENT ALTERNATIVE
0.2 0.0 0.1 0.2 8 5,932 0.1 0.8 BRAZOSPORT H S 0.6 0.0 0.3 0.6 5 1,228 0.4 2.4 BRAZOSWOOO H S 3 2,629 0.1 0. 7 CLUTE INT FREEPORT INT 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 645 0.0 0.0 LAKE JACKSON INT 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 990 0.0 0.0 VELASCO EL
2.4 o.o 0.4 1.9 31 1,757 1.8 10.1 COLUMBIA H S 3.8 0.0 0.6 3.4 31 1, 123 2.8 15.5 WEST COLUMBIA J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 833 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 43 0.0 0.0 DAMON El 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 43 0.0 0.0
2 382 0.5 3.1 DANBURY H S 2 250 0.8 4.7 DANBURY MIDDLE 0.0 o.o 0.0 0.0 0 133 0.0 0.0
0.8 0.4 2.6 2.1 47 4, 167 1.1 6.6 PEARLAND EAST J H 1 834 0.1 0.7 PEARLAND H S 1.3 0.7 3.8 5.7 46 2,648 1. 7 10.0 PEARLAND WEST J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 704 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 l J 165 0.0 0.0 SWEENY H S 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 754 0.0 0.0 SWEENY J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 411 0.0 0.0
0.7 3.9 0.3 0. 7 0.7 0.7 28 5,838 0.5 2.8
AlTER CTR 2 364 0.5 3.3 BRYAN H S 0.4 1.6 1. 8 1.8 25 2,443 1.0 6.0 BRYAN H S AT LAMAR 1 1'110 0.1 0.5
NOTE: A DASH (-) INDICATES DATA ARE NOT REPORTED TO PROTECT STUDENT ANONYMITY.
46
APPENDIX B 1996·97 CAMPUS DETAIL BY DISTRICT
DROPOUT RATES BY ETHNICITY, ANNUAL DROPOUT RATE, AND ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
COUNTY
BRAZOS
BREWSTER
BRISCOE
BROOKS
BROWN
BURLESON
DISTRICT
BRYAN ISO
COLLEGE STATION
ALPINE ISO
MARATHON ISO
SAN VICENTE ISO
TERLINGUA CSD
SILVERTON ISO
BROOKS ISO
BANGS ISO
BLANKET ISO
BROOKESMITH ISO
BROWNWOOD ISO
EARLY ISO
MAY ISO
ZEPHYR ISO
CALOWELL ISO
WHITE AFR. AM HISP ECON DIS 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 ESTIMATED DROPOUT DROPOUT DROPOUT DROPOUT TOTAL 7-12 DROPOUT LONGITUDINAL
CAMPUS RATE RATE RATE RATE DROPOUTS ENROLLMENT RATE DROPOUT RATE
JANE LONG MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o 0 737 0.0 o.o SAM RAYBURN MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 772 o.o 0.0 STEPHEN F AUSTIN MI 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 673 o.o o.o
o.5 3.9 2.4 0.8 32 3,218 1.0 5.8 A&MCONSHS 0.3 1.6 2.0 1.1 11 1 ,967 0.6 3.3 CENTER FOR AlTER LR 11.8 34.S 30.0 12.5 21 108 19.4 72.7 COLLEGE STATION J H 0.0 0.0 o.o 0.0 0 1,174 0.0 0.0 DESERT HILLS 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o 0 158 0.0 o.o
1.4 8.3 0.7 0.0 1.3 1.3 6 629 1 .o 5.6
ALPINE H S 1.0 o.o 2.0 2.4 6 402 1 .5 8.6 ALPINE J H 0.0 o.o 0.0 0.0 0 227 o.o 0.0
3 63 4.8 25.4 MARATHON SCHOOL 3 63 4.8 25.4
0.0 0.0 o.o o.o 0 8 0.0 o.o SAN VICENTE EL 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 8 0.0 0.0
2 76 2.6 14.8 BIG BENO H S 1 46 2.2 12.4 TERLINGUA EL 30 3.3 18.4
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o 0.0 0 141 0.0 0.0
SILVERTON SCHOOL 0.0 0.0 o.o 0.0 0 141 0.0 o.o
2.8 15.8 0.0 0.0 3.1 2. 1 26 919 2.8 15.8
FALFURRIAS H S o.o 0.0 4.3 2.9 22 564 3.9 21.2 FALFURRIAS J H 4 357 1. 1 6.5
1 .3 7.6 2.0 0.0 4.2 o.o 12 568 2. 1 12.0
BANGS H S 2.4 0.0 2.1 0.0 8 368 2.2 12.4 BANGS J H 0.0 0.0 o.o 0.0 0 183 0.0 0.0 C A P CO-OP 4 19 21.1 75.B EARLY SPECIAL PROGRA EARLY SPECIAL PROGRA
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 150 0.0 0.0 BANGS SPECIAL PROGRA BLANKET EL BLANKET H S 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 90 o.o 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 128 0.0 0.0 BROOKESMITH EL 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 48 0.0 0.0 BROOKESMITH H S 0.0 o.o 0.0 0.0 0 80 0.0 0.0
1.8 4.1 0.4 0.8 33 1,993 1. 7 9.5 BROWNWOOD H S 1.5 4.7 0.4 1.5 18 1, 188 1.5 8.8 BROWNWOOD MIDDLE o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 718 0.0 0.0 CAREER PREP H S 9.0 8.7 2.9 3.2 15 191 7.9 38.8
1 589 0.2 1.0 EARLY H S 1 360 0.3 1 .7 EARLY MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 229 0.0 0.0
152 0.7 3.9 BANGS SPECIAL PROGRA MAY H S
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 117 0.0 0.0 ZEPHYR H S 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 116 0.0 0.0
1.2 6.7 1. 0 2.6 1. 1 0.7 11 924 1 .2 6.9
NOTE: A DASH (·) INDICATES DATA ARE NOT REPORTED TO PROTECT STUDENT ANONYMITY.
47
APPENDIX B 1996·97 CAMPUS DETAIL BY DISTRICT
DROPOUT RATES BY ETHNICITY, ANNUAL DROPOUT RATE, AND ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
COUNTY
BURLESON
BURNET
CALDWELL
CALHOUN
CALLAHAN
CAMERON
DISTRICT
CALDWELL ISO
SNOOK ISD
SOMERVILLE ISO
BURNET CONS ISD
MA.ABLE FALLS IS
LOCKHART ISO
LULING ISD
PRAIRIE LEA ISO
CALHOUN CO ISD
BAIRO ISO
CLYDE CONS ISO
CROSS PLAINS IS
EULA ISO
BROWNSVILLE ISD
WHITE AFR. AM HISP ECON DIS 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 ESTIMATED DROPOUT DROPOUT DROPOUT DROPOUT TOTAL 7-12 DROPOUT LONGITUDINAL
CAMPUS RATE RATE RATE RATE DROPOUTS ENROLLMENT RATE DROPOUT RATE
CALDWELL ALTER 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 44 0.0 0.0 CALDWELL H S 1.5 4.4 1. 8 1.4 11 576 1.9 10.9 CALOWELL MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 346 0.0 0.0
0.0 4.8 2.5 3.4 5 236 2.1 12., BURLESON CO ALTER 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 9 0.0 0.0 SNOOK SCHOOL 0.0 4.8 2.5 3.4 5 236 2.1 12.1
2 420 0.5 2.8 BURLESON CO ALTER 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 14 0.0 0.0 SOMERVILLE H S 2 270 0.7 4.4 SOMERVILLE J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 150 0.0 0.0
0.9 5.3 1.2 0.0 4.7 1.0 23 1,321 1. 7 10.0
BURNET H S 0.6 0.0 4.7 1.7 9 769 1.2 6.8 BURNET MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 467 0.0 0.0 HIGHLAND LAKES ACHI 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 111 0.0 0.0 QUEST 8.6 0.0 26.3 3.0 14 127 11.0 50.4
3 1,563 0.2 1.1 MARBLE FALLS H S 3 995 0.3 1.8 MARBLE FALLS MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 570 0.0 0.0
1.4 8.2 1.3 0.8 2.0 2.0 31 2,049 1 .5 8.7
CAMP COMANCHE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 58 0.0 0.0 CAMP PEGASUS 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 50 0.0 0.0 JUVENILE DETENTION 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 122 0.0 0.0 LOCKHART H S 2.4 1.9 3.8 4.0 31 1 ,068 2.9 16.2 LOCKHART J H 0.0 0.0 o.o 0.0 0 706 0.0 0.0 PEGASUS SCH 0.0 0.0 o.o 0.0 0 37 0.0 0.0 PRIDE SCH 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 97 0.0 0.0
0.8 3.1 1.2 0.3 9 774 1.2 6.8 LULING H S 1.2 4.8 2.0 0.6 9 490 1.8 10.5 LULING J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 284 0.0 0.0
111 0.9 5.3 PRAIRIE LEA SCHOOL 111 0.9 5.3
1.6 9.4 1.2 0.0 2.3 1.2 34 2,082 1.6 9.4
ALTER FLEX ED 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 119 0.0 0.0 CALHOUN H S 0.5 0.0 1. 8 1.3 13 1,284 1.0 5.9 HOPE H S 20.0 0.0 18.5 16.7 19 102 18.6 71.0 SEADRIFT SCHOOLS 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 87 0.0 0.0 TRAVIS MIDDLE 2 662 0.3 1.8
0.9 5.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 228 0.0 0.0
BAIRD H S 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 228 0.0 0.0
1.1 0.0 5.7 2.2 10 760 1.3 7.6 CLYDE H s 1. 7 0.0 7.7 4.5 10 488 2.0 11. 7 CLYDE J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 272 0.0 0.0
250 0.4 2.4 CROSS PLAINS H S 250 0.4 2.4
3 315 .o 5.6 EULA H S 3 201 1.5 8.6 EULA MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 114 0.0 0.0
1.4 8.2 0.7 0.0 1. 7 1.6 295 18,128 1.6 9.4
CENTRAL MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 1. 1 0.8 7 679 1.0 6.0 CUMMINGS MIDDLE 2 630 0.3 1 .9 FAULK MIDDLE 3 708 0.4 2.5 FILEMON B VELA MIDD 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.9 5 837 0.6 3.5 HANNA H S 1.1 0.0 2.8 2.7 BO 3,000 2.7 15.0
NOTE: A DASH (-) INDICATES DATA ARE NOT REPORTED TO PROTECT STUDENT ANONYMITY.
48
APPENDIX B
1996-97 CAMPUS DETAIL BY DISTRICT
DROPOUT RATES BY ETHNICITY, ANNUAL DROPOUT RATE, ANO ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
COUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS
WHITE DROPOUT
RATE
AFR. AM DROPOUT
RATE
HISP DROPOUT
RATE
ECON DIS DROPOUT
RATE
1996-97 TOTAL
DROPOUTS
1996-97 7·12
ENROLLMENT
1996-97 DROPOUT
RATE
ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
CAMERON BROWNSVILLE ISO LINCOLN PARK SCH LOPEZ H S OLIVEIRA MIDDLE PACE H S PERKINS MIDDLE PORTER H S RAUL BESTEIRO JR MID RIVERA H S STELL MIDDLE
7.7 0.0
1.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 o.o
o.o o.o o.o
0.0 0.0
8.1 0.7
1.1 0.5 2.0
3.1 0.7
8.9 0.6
1. 1 0.4 2.1
2.8 0.7
28 12
1 28
6 52
4 62
5
350 1,690
864 2,541 1,177 2,591 1,055 2,030
751
8.0 0.1 0.1 1.1 0.5 2.0 0.4 3.1 0.7
39.4 4.2 0.7 6.4 3.0
11.5 2.3
17.0 3.9
HARLINGEN CONS COAKLEY J H HARLINGEN H s HARLINGEN H s sou KEYS ACAD MEMORIAL J H SECONDARY ALTER CTR VERNON J H
1.0 0.0 1.5 1.2 2.0
0.0 o.o o.o o.o 0.0
1.2 0.0 1.1 1.4 4.1
o.8 o.o 0.9 1.3 2.2
BB 0
31 32 19
1 2 3
7,749 849
2,647 2,335
492 956 246 856
1.1 o.o 1.2 1.4 3.9 0.1 o.8 0.4
6.6 o.o 6.8 8.0
21.0 0.6 4.8 2.1
LA FERIA ISO LA FERIA ALTER LA FERIA H S WILLIAM B GREEN MID
0.6 0.0 1.1 o.o
o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.3 0.0 2.7 2.0
1.9 0.0 2.0 1.8
27 0
19 8
1,272 76
768 471
2.1 o.o 2.5 1. 7
12.1 0.0
14.0 9.8
LOS FRESNOS CON LOS CUATES MIDDLE LOS FRESNOS H S RESECA MIDDLE RIO GRANDE MARINE
0.3 o.o
1.9 0.0
3.2 0.0
100.0 o.o
0.4 0.0
1.7 0.0
0.2 o.o
1.2 0.0
12 0 2
10 0
2,933 524
1,834 538
70
0.4 o.o 0.1 1.9 o.o
2.4 0.0 0.1
10.7 o.o
POINT ISABEL IS PORT ISABEL H S PORT ISABEL J H
1.0 1. 7 o.o
0.0 0.0 0.0
1.3 2.1 0.0
0.9 1.5 o.o
13 13
0
1,021 640 385
1.3 2.0 o.o
7.4 11.6 o.o
RIO HONDO ISO RIO HONDO H S RIO HONDO J H
4.0 4.3
o.o o.o
1.6 2.1
0.8 1.1
17 14
3
960 616 344
1.8 2.3 0.9
10.2 12.9 5.1
SAN BENITO CONS BERTA CABAZA MIDDLE BOOTH EL-NORTH BOOTH EL-SOUTH HESTER JUVENILE DET MILLER JORDAN MIDDL SAN BENITO H S
0.0
0.0 o.o o.o
0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
1.6
1.3 0.0 2.5
1.0
0.9 0.0 1.6
68 2
5 0
61
4,300 733
413 686
2,541
1.6 0.3
1.2 o.o 2.4
9.1 1.6
7.1 0.0
13.6
SANTA MARIA ISO SANTA MARIA ALTER SANTA MARIA H S SANTA MARIA MIDDLE
0.0 0.0
0.0 o.o
2.9 31.3
2.8 38.5
7 5 1 1
243 16
159 BO
2.9 31.3 0.6 1.3
16.1 89.4 3.7 7.3
SANTA ROSA ISO SANTA ROSA H S SANTA ROSA MIDDLE
0.0 0.0 o.o
0.0 0.0 0.0
2.1 3.2 0.0
1.0 1.6 0.0
12 12
0
590 383 208
2.0 3.1 o.o
11.6 17.4 0.0
SOUTH TEXAS I SO SATELLITE SCH SO TEXAS H S-HLTH P SO TEXAS H S·SAN BE THE SCIENCE ACAD THE TEACHER ACADEMY
0.2 0.0 o.o o.o
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.5 0.0 1.0 0.0
0.4 0.0 0.5 0.0
10 0 6 0 3 1
2,283 23
797 205 636 632
0.4 o.o 0.8 o.o 0.5 0.2
2.6 0.0 4.4 0.0 2.8 1.0
CAMP PITISBURG ISO
PITISBURG H S PITISBURG MIDDLE
1.1 1.6 0.0
1.2 1.7 0.0
1.0 1.8 o.o
1. 5 2.5 0.0
11 11
0
1,005 684 321
1.1 1.1 1. 6 o.o
6.4 6.4 9.3 0.0
CARSON GROOM ISO
GROOM SCHOOL 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 o.o
0.0 0.0
0 0
108 108
0.3 o.o o.o
1.6 0.0 0.0
PANHANDLE I50 2 335 0.6 3.5
NOTE: A DASH {-) INDICATES DATA ARE NOT REPORTED TO PROTECT STUDENT ANONYMITY.
49
APPENDIX B 1996-97 CAMPUS DETAIL BY DISTRICT
DROPOUT RATES BY ETHNICITY, ANNUAL DROPOUT RATE, AND ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
COUNTY
CARSON
CASS
CASTRO
CHAMBERS
CHEROKEE
DISTRICT
PANHANDLE !SD
WHITE DEER ISO
ATLANTA ISO
AVINGER ISO
BLOOMBURG ISO
HUGHES SPRINGS
LINDEN-KILDARE
MCLEOD ISO
QUEEN CITY ISO
DIMMITT ISO
HART ISO
NAZARETH ISO
ANAHUAC ISO
BARBERS HILL IS
EAST CHAMBERS I
CAMPUS
WHITE DROPOUT
RATE
AFR. AM DROPOUT
RATE
HISP DROPOUT
RATE
ECON DIS DROPOUT
RATE
1996-97 TOTAL
DROPOUTS
1996-97 7-12
ENROLLMENT
1996-97 DROPOUT
RATE
ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
CHAMPS PANHANDLE H S PANHANDLE J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
1 1 0
16 222 100
6.3 0.5 0.0
32.1 2.7 0.0
SKELLYTOWN WHITE DEER WHITE DEER
El El H S
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0
0 0 0 0
280 44 48
188
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
ATLANTA H S ATLANTA MIDDLE CORRECTIVE BEHAVIOR
2.4 3.5
0.0
2.2 2.9
0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0
2.4 3.3
0.0
23 22
1 0
1,002 670 331
13
1.3 2.3 3.3 0.3 0.0
7.5 13.0 18.1
1. 8 0.0
AVINGER H S 100 100
1.0 1.0
5.9 5.9
BLOOMBURG H S 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0 0
156 156
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
HUGHES HUGHES
SPRINGS H s SPRINGS J H
3.3 3.9
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
3.0 2.9
13 11
2
474 334 140
2.7 3.3 1. 4
15.4 18.2 8.3
LINDEN-KILDARE H S LINDEN-KILDARE J H
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
0 0 0
598 395 203
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
MCLEOD MCLEOD
H S MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
1 1 0
216 145
71
0.5 0.7 0.0
2 8 4. 1 0 0
MORRIS UPCHURCH QUEEN CITY H S
MIO 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3 0 3
670 231 439
0.4 0.0 0.7
2 .7 0 0 4.0
DIMMITT H S DIMMITT MIDDLE s 0 l
0.0 0.0
0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0
2.7 4.3
0.0
2.1 3.5
0.0
13 12
1 0
731 439 280
16
1.4 1.8 2.7 0.4 0.0
B 0 10 2 15 3 2. 1 0 0
HART JR-SR H S 2 2
223 223
0.9 0.9
5 3 5 3
NAZARETH SCHOOL 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0 0
132 132
0.0 0.0
0 0 0 0
ANAHUAC H S ANAHUAC MIDDLE GULF COAST H S HARDIN/CHAMBERS CTR
.5 2 3 o. 0
0.0
8.5 10.2 0.0
0.0
0.9 1. 5 0.0
0.0
3.2 5.6 0.0
0.0
20 17
0 3 0
686 429 234 25 49
1.9 2.9 4.0 0.0
12.0 0.0
10 9 16.3 21.5 0.0
53.6 0.0
BARBERS Hill H S BARBERS Hill MIDDLE HARDIN CHAMBERS ALTE WEST LIBERTY H S
1.7 1.3 0.0
33.3
0.0 0.0 0.0
0 0
1. 1 1 .B 0.0
0 0
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0
17 9 0 1 7
1,098 719 364
19 22
1. 5 1 .3 0.0 5.3
31 .a
8.9 7.3 0.0
27.7 90.0
EAST CHAMBERS H s EAST CHAMBERS J H GULF COAST H S HARDIN/CHAMBERS CTR
1.2 1.8 0.0
0 0 0 0 0.0
4.3 6.9 0.0
2.8 5.3 0.0
7 7 0
539 361 178
1 .3 1.9 0.0
7.5 11. 1 0.0
1.2 7.2
NOTE: A DASH (-) INDICATES DATA ARE NOT REPORTED TO PROTECT STUDENT ANONYMITY.
50
APPENDIX B
1996-97 CAMPUS DETAIL BY DISTRICT
DROPOUT RATES BY ETHNICITY, ANNUAL DROPOUT RATE, AND ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
WHITE AFR. AM HISP ECON DIS 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 ESTIMATED ORO POUT DROPOUT DROPOUT DROPOUT TOTAL 7-12 DROPOUT LONGITUDINAL
COUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS RATE RATE RATE RATE DROPOUTS ENROLLMENT RATE DROPOUT RATE
CHEROKEE ALTO ISD 1 346 0.3 1.7 ALTO H S 1 330 0.3 1.8 CHEROKEE COUNTY CO- o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 22 0.0 o.o
JACKSONVILLE IS 1.5 1.5 2.8 1.9 35 2, 126 1.8 9.5 COMPASS CTR 3.8 8.2 3.2 2.7 9 184 4.9 26.0 JACKSONVILLE H S 1.9 1.0 4.7 3.3 26 1,273 2.0 11.7 JACKSONVILLE MIDDLE 0.0 o.o 0.0 0.0 0 770 0.0 o.o
NEW SUMMERFIELD 2 154 1.3 7.5 NEW SUMMERFIELD SCHO 2 154 1.3 7.5
RUSK ISO 0.6 1.7 0.0 0.0 7 949 0.7 4.3
RUSK H S 0.6 2.4 0.0 o.o 6 637 0.9 5.5 RUSK J H 1 312 0.3 1.9
WELLS ISO 1 154 0.6 3.8 WELLS EL o.o 0.0 0.0 o.o 0 54 0.0 o.o WELLS H S 1 100 1.0 5.9
CHILDRESS 0.5 2.8
CHILDRESS ISO 3 647 0.5 2.8 CHILDRESS H s 3 422 0.7 4.2 CHILDRESS J H 0.0 0.0 o.o 0.0 0 226 o.o o.o
CLAY 1.1 6.5
BELLEVUE ISO 101 1.0 5.8 BELLEVUE SCHOOL 101 1.0 5.8
BYERS ISO o.o 0.0 0.0 o.o 0 77 0.0 o.o BYERS SCHOOL 0.0 o.o 0.0 0.0 0 77 0.0 o.o
HENRIETTA ISO 1.4 o.o 0.0 0.9 8 549 1.5 8.4 HENRIETTA H S 2.1 o.o 0.0 2.0 8 352 2.3 12.9 HENRIETTA J H 0.0 o.o 0.0 0.0 0 197 0.0 o.o
MIDWAY ISO 0.0 0.0 o.o o.o 0 98 0.0 o.o MIDWAY SCHOOL o.o 0.0 0.0 o.o 0 98 0.0 o.o
PETROLIA ISO 3 256 1.2 6.8 PETROLIA EL 0.0 o.o 0.0 0.0 0 89 0.0 o.o PETROLIA H S 3 167 1.8 10.3
COCHRAN 1.6 9.3 MORTON ISO 1.0 o.o 4.3 2.3 10 327 3.1 17.0
MORTON H S 4 214 1.9 10.7 MORTON J H 0.0 0.0 o.. o 0.0 0 113 o.o o.o
WHITEFACE CONS 2 424 0.5 2.8 P E P ALTER CO-OP 2 203 1.0 5.8 WHITEFACE H S 0.0 o.o 0.0 0.0 0 226 o.o o.o
COKE o.o o.o BRONTE ISD 0.0 o.o 0.0 0.0 0 174 o.o o.o
BRONTE H S 0.0 0.0 o.o o.o 0 166 0.0 o.o FAIRVIEW ACCELERATE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 7 0.0 o.o JUVENILE OETENT CTR 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o 0 170 0.0 o.o MILES voe TRAINING ( WATER VALLEY voe TRA
ROBERT LEE ISD 0.0 o.o 0.0 0.0 0 209 o.o o.o c 8 p MILES voe TRAINING ROBERT LEE SCHOOL 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o 0 199 0.0 o.o
COLEMAN 2.2 12.6 COLEMAN ISO 2.1 0.0 3.5 2.7 13 575 2.3 12.a
CO-OP ALTER PROG 18.8 0.0 16.0 14.3 13 74 17 .6 68.6 COLEMAN H S o.o 0.0 0.0 o.o 0 327 0.0 o.o
NOTE: A DASH (-) INDICATES DATA ARE NOT REPORTED TO PROTECT STUDENT ANONYMITY.
51
APPENDIX B 1996-97 CAMPUS DETAIL BY DISTRICT
DROPOUT RATES BY ETHNICITY, ANNUAL DROPOUT RATE, AND ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
COUNTY
COLEMAN
COLLIN
DISTRICT
COLEMAN ISO
NOVICE ISO
PANTHER CREEK C
SANTA ANNA ISO
ALLEN ISO
ANNA ISO
BLUE RIDGE ISO
CELINA ISO
COMMUNITY ISO
FARMERSVILLE IS
FRISCO ISO
MCKINNEY ISO
MELISSA ISO
PLANO ISO
WHITE AFR. AM HISP ECON DIS 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 ESTIMATED
CAMPUS DROPOUT
RATE DROPOUT
RATE DROPOUT
RATE DROPOUT
RATE TOTAL
DROPOUTS 7-12
ENROLLMENT DROPOUT
RATE LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
COLEMAN J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 180 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 61 0.0 o.o MJONES{L ROSE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 61 0.0 0.0
2 123 1.6 9.4
G A P 1 7 14.3 60.3 PANTHER CREEK H S 1 117 0.9 5.0
3.9 0.0 0.0 2.6 5 165 3.0 16 9
BANGS SPECIAL PROGRA G A P 2 17 11.8 52.8 EARLY SPECIAL PROGRA EARLY SPECIAL PROGRA SANTA ANNA H S 3 105 2 9 16.0 SANTA ANNA J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 50 0. 0 o.o
0.5 3.1
0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 17 3,874 0.4 2.6
ALLEN H S 1. 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 17 1J 719 1.0 5.6
W E PETE FORD MIOOL 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 965 0.0 0.0
WALTER & LOIS CURTI 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 1, 197 0.0 0.0
4 423 0.9 5.5
ANNA H S 4 263 1.4 8.2
ANNA MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 140 0.0 o.o
BLUE RIDGE H S 3.5 5.4
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
6.9 14.3
7 7
208 135
3.4 5.2
18.6 27.3
SLUE RIDGE MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 73 0.0 o.o
1.4 2.6 9.5 3.1 10 444 2.3 12.8 CELINA H S 2.1 4.0 13.3 5.3 10 298 3.4 18.5 CELINA MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 146 0.0 o.o
483 0.2 1.2
COMMUNITY H S 312 0.3 1.9
COMMUNITY MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 171 0.0 0.0
1.2 3.1 4. 7 4.3 9 500 1.8 10.3 FARMERSVILLE H S 1.9 5.9 7.7 8.3 9 323 2.8 15.6 FARMERSVILLE MIDDLE 0.0 o.o 0.0 0.0 0 177 0.0 o.o
0.8 0 0 2.5 0.0 13 1, 173 1.1 6 5 BENTON A STALEY MIO 0.0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 475 0.0 0 0
FRISCO H S 1.3 0 0 4.3 0.0 13 698 1.9 10 7
0.1 0.9 0.5 0.3 9 3,361 0.3 1 .6
DOWELL MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 642 0.0 0 0
FAUBION MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 567 0.0 0 0
MCKINNEY H S 4 1,954 0.2 1 .2
THE ACT ACAD AT J l 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 118 0.0 0 0
THE L I N C CTR 4 216 1.9 10.6
0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 80 0.0 o.o MELISSA J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 80 0.0 o.o
0.3 0.6 1.4 1.1 68 18,346 0.4 2.2
ARMSTRONG MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 605 0.0 o.o BOWMAN MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 755 0.0 o.o CARPENTER MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 807 0.0 o.o CLARK H S 0.6 0.0 3.4 2.0 11 1 ,389 0.8 4. 7
HAGGARD MIDDLE 0.0 o.o 0.0 0.0 0 671 0.0 o.o HENDRICK MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 697 0.0 0.0
HOSPITAL{HOMEBOUND JASPER H S
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 1
91 1,272
0.0 0.1
o.o 0.5
PLANO EAST SR H S 0.6 2.9 2.6 2.8 23 2, 123 1.1 6.3
PLANO SR H S 0.4 0.0 0.8 0.0 13 3, 179 0.4 2.4
RENNER MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 1,074 0.0 o.o R081NSON MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 588 0.0 o.o SCHIMELPFENIG MIDDL 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 715 0.0 o.o
NOTE: A DASH (-) INDICATES DATA ARE NOT REPORTED TO PROTECT STUDENT ANONYMITY.
52
APPENDIX B
1996-97 CAMPUS DETAIL BY DISTRICT
DROPOUT RATES BY ETHNICITY, ANNUAL DROPOUT RATE, AND ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
WHITE AFR. AM HISP ECON DIS 1996·97 1996·97 1996-97 ESTIMATED
DROPOUT DROPOUT DROPOUT DROPOUT TOTAL 7·12 DROPOUT LONGITUDINAL
COUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS RATE RATE RATE RATE DROPOUTS ENROLLMENT RATE DROPOUT RATE
COLLIN PLANO ISO SHEPTON H S 2 1,050 0.2 1.1 VINES H S 3 1,456 0.2 1.2 WILLIAMS H S 0.5 0.7 2.8 2.7 12 1,326 0.9 5.3 WILSON MIDDLE 3 794 0.4 2.3
PRINCETON ISO 0.6 18.2 1.5 1.6 8 861 0.9 5.5
CLARK MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 308 0.0 0.0
PRINCETON H S 1.0 33.3 2.3 3.3 8 553 1.4 8.4
PROSPER ISO 3 333 0.9 5.3 PROSPER H S 3 207 1.4 8.4
PROSPER J H 0.0 o.o 0.0 0.0 0 126 0.0 0.0
WYLIE ISO o.. 6 3.7 1.9 3.1 13 1,685 0.8 4.5 WYLIE H S 1.0 5.6 3.2 5.9 13 1,063 1.2 7.1 WYLIE INT WYLIE J H
COLLINGSWORTH 1.0 5.7
SAMNORWOOD ISO 72 1.4 8.1 SAMNORWOOO SCHOOL 72 1.4 8.1
WELLINGTON ISO 3 341 0.9 5.2
WELLINGTON H S 3 234 1.3 7.5 WELLINGTON J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 107 0.0 0.0
COLORADO 1. 0 6.1
COLUMBUS ISO 0.7 1.4 5.3 2.4 13 858 1.5 8.8
COLUMBUS H S 1.0 2.2 8.4 4.1 13 577 2.3 12.8
COLUMBUS J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 281 0.0 0.0
RICE CONS ISO 4 699 0.6 3.4 EAGLE LAKE MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 166 0.0 0.0
GARWOOD EL 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 43 0.0 0.0 RICE H S 4 442 • 0.9 5.3 SHERIDAN EL 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 51 0.0 0.0
WEIMAR- ISO 3 366 0.6 4.8
WEIMAR H S 3 278 1.1 6.3 WEIMAR J H o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 90 o.o o.o
COMAL 0.5 2.8
COMAL ISO 0.6 0.0 1.2 1.0 33 4,501 0.7 4.3 CANYON H S 0.7 0.0 1.6 1. 7 11 t, 188 0.9 5.4 CANYON MIDDLE 1 653 0.2 0.9 COMAL LEADERSHIP INS 1 196 0.5 3.0 NEW LIFE TREATMENT 0.0 o.o 0.0 0.0 0 68 0.0 0.0
SMITHSON VALLEY H S 1.2 0.0 2.1 1.8 20 1,580 1.3 7.4 SMITHSON VALLEY MID 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 995 o.o 0.0
NEW BRAUNFELS I 2 3,003 0.1 0.4 NEW BRAUNFELS H S 2 1,992 0.1 0.6 NEW BRAUNFELS MIDDL o.o 0.0 o.o 0.0 0 1,016 0.0 0.0
COMANCHE 1.0 5.7 COMANCHE ISO 1.0 0.0 1.4 1.1 7 615 1.1 6.6
COMANCHE H S 1.5 0.0 1.6 1.4 6 393 1.5 8.8 JEFFERIES J H 1 222 0.5 2.7
DE LEON ISO 2 341 0.6 3.5 OE LEON H S 2 211 0.9 5.6 PERKINS MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 130 0.0 0.0
GUSTINE ISO 2 108 1.9 10.6
GUSTINE SCHOOL 2 108 1.9 10.6
SIDNEY ISO 0.0 o.o 0.0 0.0 0 96 o.o o.o SIDNEY SCHOOL 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o 0 96 0.0 0.0
NOTE: A DASH (·) INDICATES DATA ARE NOT REPORTED TO PROTECT STUDENT ANONYMITY.
53
APPENDIX B
1996-97 CAMPUS DETAIL BY DISTRICT
DROPOUT RATES BY ETHNICITY, ANNUAL DROPOUT RATE, AND ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
COUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS
WHITE DROPOUT
RATE
AFR. AM DROPOUT
RATE
HISP DROPOUT
RATE
ECON DIS DROPOUT
RATE
1996·97 TOTAL
DROPOUTS
1996-97 7-12
ENROLLMENT
1996·97 DROPOUT
RATE
ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
CONCHO EDEN CONS ISO
C 6 P EDEN H S FAIRVIEW ACCELERATED MILES voe TRAINING (
0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o 0
216
209 7
0.3 0.5
0.0 14.3
1. 6 2.6
0 0 60 3
PAINT ROCK ISO PAINT ROCK SCHOOL
0.0 0.0
0 0 0 0
0.0 0.0
o.o o.o
0 0
113 113
0 0 0 0
0.0 0.0
COOKE CALLISBURG ISO
CALLISBURG H S CALLISBURG J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o
4 4 0
516 347 172
0 8 0.8 1.2 0.0
4.4 4.5 6.7 0.0
ERA ISO ERA SCHOOL
4 4
216 216
1.8 1.8
10.5 10.5
GAINESVILLE ISO GAINESVILLE ALTER E GAINESVILLE H S GAINESVILLE MIDDLE
0.7 0.0 1.1 0.0
1 .7 0 0 2 6 0 0
1.0 0.0 1.6 0.0
1. 4 o.o 2.6 o.o
11 0
11 0
1,327 B7
665 457
0.6 0.0 1.3 0.0
4.9 0.0 7.4 0.0
LINDSAY ISO LINDSAY EL LINDSAY H S
0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o 1 0
246 90
156
0.4 0.0 0.6
2.4 0.0 3. 7
MUENSTER ISO MUENSTER H S
205 205
0.5 0.5
2.9 2.9
SIVELLS BEND IS SIVELLS BENO EL
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
o.o o.o
0 0
19 19
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
VALLEY VIEW ISO VALLEY VIEW H S
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
o.o o.o
0 0
281 281
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
WALNUT BEND ISO WALNUT BEND EL
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
o.o o.o
0 0
10 10
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
CORYELL COPPERAS COVE I
COPPERAS COVE H s COPPERAS COVE J H CROSS ROADS SCLEEJH
0.7 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.7 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0
1.0 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.6 1.1 o.o o.o o.o
27 27
0 0 0
3,575 2, 191
605 271 665
1. 1 0.6 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0
6.6 4.5 7.2 0.0 0.0 0.0
EVANT ISO EVANT H S
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
o.o o.o
0 0
164 164
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
GATESVILLE ISO GATESVILLE H S GATESVILLE J H
2.3 3.4
5.4 9.4
4.2 6.5
1.5 2.8
31 30
1
1, 181 749 432
2.6 4.0 0.2
14.8 21.8
1.4
JONESBORO ISO JONESBORO SCHOOL
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
o.o o.o
0 0
118 116
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
OGLESBY ISO OGLESBY SCHOOL
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 o.o
0 0
66 66
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
COTTLE PADUCAH ISO
GOODWIN EL PADUCAH H S
4.3 0.0 5.7
3.6 0.0 6.3
0.0 0.0 0.0
3.6 o.o 5.6
6 0 6
199 61
138
3.0 3.0 0.0 4.3
16.8 16.8 0.0
23.4
CRANE CRANE ISO
CRANE H s CRANE J H
0.7 1.1
0.0 0.0
1.4 1.6
1.0 0.6
6 5
605 384 221
1.0 1.0 1.3 0.5
5.6 5.6 7.6 2 .7
NOTE: A DASH ( - ) INDICATES DATA ARE NOT REPORTED TO PROTECT STUDENT ANONYMITY.
54
APPENDIX B
1996-97 CAMPUS DETAIL BY DISTRICT
DROPOUT RATES BY ETHNICITY 1 ANNUAL DROPOUT RATE, AND ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
WHITE AFR. AM HISP ECON DIS 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 ESTIMATED DROPOUT DROPOUT DROPOUT DROPOUT TOTAL 7·12 DROPOUT LONGITUDINAL
COUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS RATE RATE RATE RATE DROPOUTS ENROLLMENT RATE DROPOUT RATE
CROCKETT 1.2 6.9 CROCKETT CO CON 0.0 o.o 2.0 1.6 6 505 1.2 6.9
OZONA H S 0.0 o.o 2.9 2.6 6 338 1.8 10.2
OZONA MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 167 o.o o.o
CROSBY 1.3 7.3 CROSBYTON ISO 2 312 0.6 3.8
CAP ROCK CO LRN C0-0 CROSBYTON H S 0.0 o.o 0.0 o.o 0 190 0.0 0.0 CROSBYTON MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 111 0.0 0.0 SP ED CO-OP
LORENZO ISO 3 230 1.3 7.6 LORENZO H S 3 230 1.3 7.6
RALLS ISO 0.0 0.0 2.5 2.1 6 349 1.7 9.9 ALTER SCH EAST PLAINS ED SSA RALLS H S 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 208 0.0 0.0 RALLS MIDDLE o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 127 0.0 0.0
CULBERSON o.o 0.0 CULBERSON COUNT 0.0 0.0 o.o 0.0 0 387 0.0 0.0
EAGLE MT ACAD o.o 0.0 o.o 0.0 0 51 0.0 0.0 VAN HORN H S o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 222 0.0 0.0 VAN HORN J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 152 0.0 0.0
DALLAM 1.2 7.0 DALHART ISO 0.6 5.6 2.2 1.4 8 744 1.1 6.3
DALHART H S 0.0 10.0 3.4 2.6 5 478 1.0 6.1 DALHART J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 244 0.0 0.0 X I T SECONDARY SCHO 3 37 8.1 39.8
TEXLINE ISO 2 94 2.1 12.1 TEXLINE SCHOOL 2 94 2.1 12.1
DALLAS 1.8 10.4
CARROLLTON· FARM 0.6 1.1 1.6 0.5 76 9,393 0.8 4.8 BEA SALAZAR TRANSIT 8.8 14.3 11.5 5.9 26 256 10.2 47.4
BLALACK MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 902 0.0 0.0 DAN F LONG MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 941 o.o 0.0 FIELD MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 732 0.0 o.o MARIE HUIE ALTER EO 4 254 1.6 9.1 MARIE HUIE SP ED CT 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 20 0.0 0.0 MARY GRIMES CTR 3.3 6.5 2.7 o.o 14 429 3.3 18.0 NEWMAN SMITH H S 0.4 1. 1 0.8 0.5 13 2,922 0.4 2.6 PERRY MIDDLE 3 761 0.4 2.3 TURNER H S 0.4 0.5 1.2 0.4 16 2,540 0.6 3.7 WEST MIDDLE 0.0 o.o 0.0 0.0 0 194 0.0 0.0
CEDAR HILL ISO 0.2 0.1 0.6 0.0 6 2,912 0.2 1.2 CEDAR HILL H S 0.3 0.2 1.0 0.0 6 1,848 0.3 1.9 W S PERMENTER MIDDL 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 1,067 0.0 0.0
COPPELL ISO 0.4 0.0 0.5 1.3 9 2,718 0.3 2.0 COPPELL H S 0.6 o.o 0.8 2.4 9 1,665 0.5 3.2 COPPELL MIDDLE EAST 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o 0 571 0.0 0.0 COPPELL MIDDLE WEST 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o 0 482 0.0 0.0
DALLAS CAN! ACA 7.9 22.6 23.6 20.5 114 522 21.8 77 .2 DALLAS CAN! ACADEMY 7.9 22.6 23.6 20.5 114 522 21.8 77 .2
DALLAS ISO 2.0 2.1 3.0 2.2 1,538 63,271 2.4 13. 7 A MACED SMITH H S 0.0 2.7 0.0 2.6 27 1,031 2.6 14.7 ADULT BASIC ED-FED 2 1 ,801 0.1 0.7 ALEX W SPENCE MIDDL 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 l ,014 0.0 o.o BENJAMIN FRANKLIN Ml 1 1,095 0.1 0.6 BOOKER T WASHINGTON 1 704 0.1 0.9 BOUOE STOREY MIDDLE 0.0 2.2 4.1 2.4 27 888 3.0 16.9 BRYAN ADAMS H S 4 2,580 0.2 0.9 BUSINESS & MGMT CTR 1 601 0.2 1.0 COMPREHENSIVE EVENI 0.0 1.8 4.7 2.0 8 296 2.7 15.2 D A HULCY MIDDLE 2 715 0.3 1. 7 DAVID WCARTER H S 3.7 3.4 15.9 3.5 88 2,203 4.0 21. 7
DEALEY MONTESSORI A 4.7 2.1 3.9 1.7 6 148 4.1 22.0 E B COMSTOCK MIDDLE 2.4 0.6 2.2 1.0 18 1,157 1.6 9.0 E H CARY MIDDLE 0.0 0.5 0.7 0.8 7 1, 151 0.6 3.6
NOTE: A DASH ( - I INDICATES DATA ARE NOT REPORTED TO PROTECT STUDENT ANONYMITY.
55
APPENDIX B
1996·97 CAMPUS DETAIL BY DISTRICT
DROPOUT RATES BY ETHNICITY, ANNUAL DROPOUT RATE, AND ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
WHITE AFR. AM HISP ECON DIS 1996·97 1996-97 1996-97 ESTIMATED DROPOUT DROPOUT DROPOUT DROPOUT TOTAL 7-12 DROPOUT LONGITUDINAL
COUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS RATE RATE RATE RATE DROPOUTS ENROLLMENT RATE DROPOUT RATE
DALLAS DALLAS ISO EDISON ENVIRO SCIEN 5.2 4.7 0.0 2.8 6 200 3 0 16. 7 EOISON LEARNING CTR 0.0 0.5 2.7 1. 4 16 922 1 .7 10.0 EDUC & SOCIAL SERV 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o 0 173 0 0 0.0 FRED F FLORENCE MIOD 3 1J157 0.3 1.5 H GRADY SPRUCE H S 3.6 1.8 1.9 1 .5 38 1 ,906 2.0 11 .4 H S FOR HEALTH PROF 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o 0 540 0.0 0.0 HARRY STONE MONTESS 3.6 4.5 2.9 3.6 6 135 4.4 23.9 HEALTH SPECIAL 33.3 16.2 22.9 19.2 61 329 18.5 70.8 HENRY W LONGFELLOW A 2 390 0.5 3.0 HILLCREST H S 1.4 1. 7 2.2 2.0 31 1 J 764 1.8 10.1 J L LONG MIDDLE 0.6 0.9 1.8 1.0 18 1, 198 1.5 8.7 JAMES MADISON H S 2 1,015 0.2 1.2 JOHN B HOOD MIDDLE 0.0 1.2 0.3 0.7 9 1,279 0.7 4.2 JUSTIN F KIMBALL H 5.1 5.0 11. 4 6.1 146 2, 183 6. 7 34.0 L G PINKSTON H S 0.0 3.5 4.5 3.8 37 973 3.8 20.8 L V STOCKARD MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 1.2 1.2 13 1, 177 1. 1 6.5 LANGUAGE ACAO 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o 0 339 0.0 0.0 LINCOLN H S 3 1,408 0.2 1.3 LRN AlTEA CTR E Y 1 512 0.2 1.2 MAG CTR-PUB SERV:GO 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o 0 372 0.0 0.0 METROPOLITAN ED CTR 2 344 0.6 3.4 MIDDLE COLLEGE 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o 0 166 0.0 0.0 NORTH DALLAS H S 5.4 1.9 5.0 4.2 88 2,026 4.3 23.4 0 W HOLMES MIDDLE 3 1, 108 0.3 1.6 PEARL C ANDERSON MI 0.0 1.4 2.5 1.6 18 1,221 1.5 8.5 ROBERT T HILL MIDDLE 2 791 0.3 1.5 ROOSEVELT H S 0.0 2.0 2.5 2.0 25 1 ,202 2.1 11.9 SARAH ZUMNALT MIDOL 0.0 1. 8 6.3 2.2 20 978 2.0 11.7 SCH COMM GUIDE CTR 3.3 4.2 4.4 3.9 31 724 4.3 23.1 SCIENCE/TECHNOLOGY 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o 0 214 0.0 0.0 SEAGOVILLE ALTER CT 0.0 2.6 0.0 1.0 5 344 1.5 8.4 SEAGOVILLE H S 4.3 6.0 3.9 3.8 48 1,086 4.4 23.8 SEAGOVILLE MIDDLE 1.6 0.9 0.7 1.3 11 817 1.3 7.8 SKYLINE H S 2.1 1.5 2.8 1.5 86 4,001 2.1 12.2 SOUTH OAK CLIFF H s 0.0 1.3 7.1 1.6 31 1,571 2.0 11.3 SUNSET H S 1.6 3.4 2.2 1.8 61 2,722 2.2 12.7 T W BROWNE MIDDLE 0.0 1. 7 2.8 1. 7 24 1,276 1.9 10.8 TAG MAGNET o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 145 0.0 0.0 THOMAS C MARSH MIDD 1 .4 0.4 3.4 1.9 23 1,036 2.2 12.6 THOMAS J RUSK MIDDL 8.3 3.5 4 4 3.1 37 926 4.0 21.7 THOMAS JEFFERSON H 2.2 2.9 2 7 3.0 43 1,558 2.8 15.5 W E GREINER MIDDLE 1.0 0. 7 1 .7 1. 4 38 2,431 1 .6 9.0 W H ADAMSON H S 3.8 3.6 6.0 5.0 105 1,829 5.7 29.9 W H ATWELL MIDDLE 4 967 0.4 2.5 W H GASTON MIDDLE 0.5 0.4 1.8 0.5 8 988 0.8 4.8 W T WHITE H S 2 1,947 0.1 0.6 W W SAMUELL H S 4.6 4.4 6.5 4.8 93 1,813 5.1 27 .1 WALKER SP ED CTR 3 173 1. 7 10.0 WOODROW WILSON H s 1.9 4.8 3.8 3.8 63 1,721 3.7 20.0
DE SOTO ISO 1. 7 0.8 1.6 1.2 47 3,500 1. 3 7.8 DE SOTO EAST J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 744 0.0 0.0 DE SOTO H S 2.8 1 .3 2.7 2.4 47 2,207 2.1 12.1 DE SOTO WEST J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 551 0.0 0.0
DUNCANVILLE ISO 2.0 1.5 1.4 1. 8 96 5,634 1. 7 9.8 ALEXANDER El DUNCANVILLE H S 2.1 1.0 3.0 2.1 46 2,550 1.8 10.4 DUNCANVILLE 9TH GR 1. 6 0.9 0.7 1.4 12 1 ,007 1.2 6.9 P A C E 0.0 o.o 0.0 o.o 0 147 0.0 0.0 P A S S LEARNING CTR REED J H 2.4 2.6 0.0 1.9 22 1 ,022 2.2 12.2 WHBYRDJH 1. 7 1.9 0.0 1.4 16 969 1. 7 9.5
GARLAND ISO 0.6 1.0 1. 4 1.0 162 20,021 0.8 4.8 AUSTIN ACAD FOR EXCE 1 621 0.2 1. 0 B G HUDSON MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o 0 769 0.0 0.0 BRANDENBURG MIDDLE 2 540 0.4 2.2 BUSSEY MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 668 0.0 0.0 COOP BEHAVIORAL CTR 2 30 6.7 33.9 COYLE MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o 0 839 0.0 0.0 GARLAND ALTER ED 1.3 0.7 1.4 1. 8 6 544 1.1 6.4 GARLAND H S 0.9 1.4 2.5 2.2 30 2,365 1.3 7 .4 GISD EVENING SCH 3.9 6.3 12.0 0.0 7 124 5.6 29 4 HOUSTON MIDDLE 4 708 0.6 3 3 JACKSON MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 o.o 0 0 0 553 0.0 0 0 LAKEVIEW CENTENNIAL 0.4 1.3 0.5 0.4 10 1, 702 0.6 3.5
NOTE: A DASH (-) INDICATES DATA ARE NOT REPORTED TO PROTECT STUDENT ANONYMITY.
56
APPENDIX B
1996-97 CAMPUS DETAIL BY DISTRICT
DROPOUT RATES BY ETHNICITY, ANNUAL DROPOUT RATE, AND ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
WHITE AFR. AM HISP ECON DIS 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 ESTIMATED DROPOUT DROPOUT DROPOUT DROPOUT TOTAL 7-12 DROPOUT LONGITUDINAL
COUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS RATE RATE RATE RATE DROPOUTS ENROLLMENT RATE DROPOUT RATE
DALLAS GARLAND ISO LYLES MIDDLE o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 840 0.0 o.o MEMORIAL PREPARATOR o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 123 0.0 o.o N GARLAND H S 0.8 0.3 1.1 0.7 16 2,093 0.8 4.5 NAAMAN FOR EST H S 0,3 o.o 0.9 0.3 8 2,460 0.3 1.9 OBANION MIDDLE o.o 0.0 2.8 1. 7 5 680 0.7 4.3 ROWLETT H S 4 1,605 0.2 1.5 S GARLAND H S 2.1 3.1 4.0 3.0 64 2,432 2.6 14.8 SELLERS MIDDLE 2 558 0.4 2.1 WEBB MIDDLE 1 727 0.1 0.8
GRANO PRAIRIE I 1.6 1.6 3.1 1.3 187 8,645 2.2 12.3 ADAMS MIDDLE 1 577 0.2 1.0 ALTER ED CTR 1 713 0.1 0.8 GRANO PRAIRIE H S 2.3 1.7 3.4 2.2 67 2,471 2~7 15.2 HARRY S TRUMAN MIOOL 2 553 0.4 2.2 JACKSON MIDDLE 4 680 0.6 3.5 JEFFERSON INT 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 33 0.0 o.o KENNEDY MIDDLE 1 659 0.2 0.9 LEE MIDDLE 1 746 0.1 '0.0 S E R 14.6 14.3 24.5 0.0 35 163 21.5 76.6 SHADY GROVE PLUS CT 6.8 2.6 5.5 4 .3 17 310 5.5 28.7 SO GRAND PRAIRIE H 1.6 1.8 3.1 2.2 58 2,847 2.0 1t.6
HIGHLAND PARK I 0.0 0.0 o.o 0.0 0 2,366 0.0 o.o HIGHLAND PARK H S 0.0 0.0 o.o 0.0 0 1,496 0.0 o.o HIGHLAND PARK MIDDL 0.0 o.o 0.0 0.0 0 870 0.0 o.o
IRVING ISO 1.8 2.5 4.1 2.9 299 11,466 2.6 14. 7 BOWIE J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 918 o.o o.o CROCKETT J H 3 698 0.4 2.6 GILBERT BLDG 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 25 0.0 o.o HOMEBOUND 2 14 14.3 60.3 IRVING H S 3.1 6.9 9.0 7.4 142 2,459 5.8 30.0 IRVING REASSIGNMENT 3 56 5.4 28.1 LAMAR J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o 0 744 0.0 o.o LANGUAGE DEVEL CTR 0.0 o.o 7.2 6.8 5 73 6.8 34.7 MACARTHUR H S 1.8 1.5 3.6 2.2 46 2,265 2.0 11.6 NIMITZ H S 1.7 2.5 3.5 3.0 55 2,371 2.3 13.1 SAM HOUSTON J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 620 o.o o.o STEPHEN F AUSTIN J o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 792 o.o o.o TRAVIS J H 0.8 o.o 1.0 0.7 5 684 0.7 4.3 UNION BOWER CTR 10.6 8.9 11.3 10.4 38 347 11.0 50.1
LANCASTER ISO 0.8 0.7 0.5 0.0 14 1,995 0.7 4.1 LANCASTER H S 0.8 0.5 0.9 0.0 8 1,218 0.7 3.9 LANCASTER J H 0.8 0.9 0.0 0.0 6 777 0.8 4.5
MESQUITE ISO 1.2 0.7 1.4 1.1 163 14, 126 1.2 6.7 A C NEW MIDDLE 0.7 0.9 0.8 1.2 6 787 0.8 4.5 AGNEW MIDDLE 0.6 0.6 0.0 0.5 6 1,246 0.5 2.9 MCDONALD MIDDLE 3 1,061 0.3 1.7 MESQUITE ACAO 2.6 0.0 0.0 5.0 10 476 2.1 12.0 MESQUITE H S 2.2 0.9 1.7 1.3 59 3,016 2.0 11.2 NORTH MESQUITE H S 1.5 0.9 2.0 2 .3 36 2,434 1.5 8.6 R S KIMBROUGH MIDDL 0.0 0.0 o.o 0.0 0 886 0.0 o.o RALPH H POTEET H S 1.1 1.3 3.0 0.9 19 1,699 1.1 6.5 VANSTON MIDDLE 1 778 0.1 0.8 WEST MESQUITE H S 1.2 1.1 2.5 0.7 21 1,513 1.4 8.0 WILKINSON MIDDLE 2 746 0.3 1.6
RENAISSANCE CHA o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 346 o.o o.o RENAISSANCE CHARTER o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 346 0.0 o.o
RICHARDSON ISO 0.8 1. 7 2.5 1.6 191 16,055 1.2 6.9 ALTER LEARNING CTR 1.1 3.6 4.7 2.8 6 225 2.7 15.0 APOLLO J H o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 1,044 0.0 o.o BERKNER H S 1.9 2.9 1.9 5.4 49 2,248 2.2 12.4 FOREST MEADOW J H 0.5 1.3 4.2 1.0 17 1,379 1.2 7.2 LAKE HIGHLANDS H S 0.4 4 .3 3.8 1. 5 34 1 ,903 1.8 10.3 LAKE HIGHLANDS J H 0.4 0.9 1.7 1.0 10 1,368 0.7 4 .3 LIBERTY J H 0.0 o.o 0.0 0.0 0 1,030 o.o o.o PARKHILL J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o 0 610 0.0 o.o PEARCE H S 1.0 0.0 4.5 4.2 17 1,570 1.1 6.3 RICHARDSON H S 2.4 1.4 4.0 2.9 41 1,688 2.4 13.7 RICHARDSON J H 2 784 0.3 1.5 RICHARDSON NORTH J 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 761 0.0 o.o RICHARDSON WEST J H 2 963 0.2 1.2
NOTE: A DASH (-) INDICATES DATA ARE NOT REPORTED TO PROTECT STUDENT ANONYMITY.
57
APPENDIX B 1996·97 CAMPUS DETAIL BY DISTRICT
DROPOUT RATES BY ETHNICITY, ANNUAL DROPOUT RATE, AND ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
COUNTY
DALLAS
DAWSON
DEAF SMITH
DELTA
DENTON
DISTRICT
RICHARDSON ISO
SUNNYVALE ISO
WILMER-HUTCHINS
DAWSON ISO
KLONDIKE ISO
LAMESA ISO
SANDS ISO
HEREFORD ISO
COOPER ISO
FANNINDEL ISO
ARGYLE ISO
AUBREY ISO
DENTON ISO
KRUM ISO
LAKE DALLAS ISO
LEWISVILLE ISO
CAMPUS
WHITE DROPOUT
RATE
AFR. AM DROPOUT
RATE
HISP DROPOUT
RATE
ECON DIS DROPOUT
RATE
1996-97 TOTAL
DROPOUTS
1996-97 7-12
ENROLLMENT
1996·97 DROPOUT
RATE
ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
WESTWOOD J H 0.8 0.6 3.2 1.9 13 993 1.3 7 6
SUNNYVALE EL 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0 0
88 88
0.0 0.0
0 0
0 0
KENNEDY-CURRY J H WILMER-HUTCHINS H s
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
0 0 0
1,459 468 991
0.0 0.0 0.0
0 0 0
0 0 0
DAWSON SCHOOL 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0 0
88 88
2.3 0.0 0.0
13 0 0
0 0 0
KLONDIKE H s 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0 0
105 105
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
ALTER CTR LAMESA H S LAMESA MIDDLE
0.5 8.3 0.0
2.8 0.0 4.5
4.0 13.2 1.6
2.0 10.1 1. 1
37 27
9
1,320 226 746 460
2.8 11.9 1.2 0.2
15 7 53 4 7.0 1. 3
SANDS H S 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0 0
109 109
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
HEREFORD H S HEREFORD J H SHIRLEY EL
1.3 1.9
0.0 0.0
4.4 5.6
2.4 3.6
72 58
2,203 1,392
3.3 3.3 4.2
1B.1 1B.1 22. 5
COOPER H s COOPER J H
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
0 0 0
450 306 144
0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0
4.1 0.0 0.0 0.0
FANNINDEL H s 4 4
126 126
3.2 3.2
17.6 17.6
ARGYLE SCHOOL 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0 0
0 0
0.0 0.0
0 0
157 157
0.7 0.0 0.0
4.1 0.0 0.0
AUBREY AUBREY
H S MIDDLE
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
0 0 0
420 274 146
0.0 0.0 0.0
0 0 0
0 0 0
A 0 CALHOUN MIDDLE DENTON H S FRED MOORE LEARN CT JUVENILE DETENT CTR NELSON CTR RYAN H S STRICKLAND MIDDLE TOUCHSTONE ACADEMY
1.0
0.5 5.0 0.0 0.0 1.8
1.a
1.5
2.3 9.4 0.0 0.0 0.4
6.3
2.8
1. 7 9.1 0.0 0.0 4.7
6.3
1.8
1. 3 10.3 0.0 0.0 2.8
4.3
76 3
13 13 0 0
40 2 5
5,814 846
1 ,486 215 232
79 2,000 1,229
161
1.3 0.4 0.9 6.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.2 3.1
7.6 2.1 5.1
31.2 0.0 0.0
11.4 1.a
17.3
KRUM KRUM
H S MIDDLE
1.9 2.8 0.0
12.5 20.0 a.a
3 5 0
3 6 0
3.5 7. 7 0.0
10 10
0
460 3a9 151
2.2 3.2 0.0
12.4 17.9 0.0
LAKE LAKE
DALLAS H S DALLAS MIDDLE 0.0 a.a 0.0 0.0
2 2 0
1,057 66a 397
0.2 0.3 0.0
.1 1 .8 0 a
ARBOR CREEK MIDDLE BRIARHILL MIDDLE DELAY MIDDLE FORESTWOOD MIDDLE
0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
53 0 0 0 0
13,211 458 730 442 571
0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2 4 0 0 o.a a.o a.o
NOTE: A DASH (-) INDICATES DATA ARE NOT REPORTED TO PROTECT STUDENT ANONYMITY.
58
APPENDIX B
1996-97 CAMPUS DETAIL BY DISTRICT
DROPOUT RATES BY ETHNICITY, ANNUAL DROPOUT RATE, AND ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
COUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS
WHITE DROPOUT
RATE
AFR. AM DROPOUT
RATE
HISP DROPOUT
RATE
ECON DIS DROPOUT
RATE
1996-97 TOTAL
DROPOUTS
1996-97 7-12
ENROLLMENT
1996·97 DROPOUT
RATE
ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT .RATE
DENTON LEWISVILLE ISO GRIFFIN MIDDLE HEDRICK MIDDLE LAKEVIEW MIDDLE lAIAAR MIDDLE LEARNING CTR LEWISVILLE H S MARCUS H S MILLIKEN MIDDLE THE COLONY H S
0.0 O.D D.D 0.0 5.2 1.2
o.o
0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o 6.3 1.2
0.0
0.0 O.D O.D 0.0 5.9 2.7
0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o 33,3 o.8
0.0
0 0 D 0 8
42 2 0 1
458 536 604 721 155
3, 107 2, 709
555 2,360
o.o o.o D.D 0.0 5.2 1.4 0.1 o.o o.o
o.o o.o o.o o.o
27.2 7.8 0.4 o.o 0.3
LITTLE ELM ISD LITTLE LITTLE
ELM H S ELM MIDDLE
1.4 2.3 0.0
0.0 o.o 0.0
0.7 1.4 0.0
1. 7 3.1 0.0
8 8 0
627 387 240
1.3 2.1 o.o
7.4 11.8 o.o
NORTHWEST ISO DENTON CREEK I I HASLET EL NORTHWEST ALLIANCE A NORTHWEST H S NORTHWEST MIDDLE
0.9
1.1 0.0
0.0
0.0 o.o
0.6
1.0 0.0
2.1
3.3 o.o
18
3 15 0
2,214
126 1,360
764
o.8
2.4 1.1 0.0
4.8
13.5 6.4 o.o
PILOT POINT ISO GEE J H J EARL SELZ H S
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4 0 4
521 207 314
0.8 o.o 1.3
4.5 o.o 7.4
PONDER ISO PONDER H S
2 2
256 256
0.8 0.8
4.6 4.6
SANGER ISO SANGER H S SANGER MIDDLE o.o 0.0 o.o 0.0
4 4 0
907 578 329
0.4 0.7 o.o
2.6 4.1 o.o
DEWITT CUERO ISD
CUERO H S CUERO J H OAULE # 2
0.3 0.5
3.8 5.8
2.5 4.4
1.4 2.8
16 16
1,082 691
1.0 1.5 2.3
5.9 8.6
13.1
MEYERSVILLE ISO MEYERSVILLE EL
0.0 o.o
0.0 0.0
o.o o.o
0.0 0.0
0 0
40 40
o.o o.o
o.o o.o
NORDHEIM ISO NORDHEIM SCHOOL
4 4
59 59
6.8 6.8
34.4 34.4
WESTHOFF ISO WESTHOFF EL
0.0 0.0
o.o o.o
0.0 0.0
O.D D.D
0 0
20 20
0.0 o.o
o.o o.o
YOAKUM ISO YOAKUM H S YOAKUM J H D.D o.o 0.0 o.o
4 4 0
833 561 272
0.5 0.7 0.0
2.9 4.2 o.o
YORKTOWN ISO YORKTO'tYN H S YORKTOWN J H
0.0 0.0 0.0
o.o 0.0 o.o
0.0 0.0 0.0
D.D 0.0 o.o
0 0 0
373 259 114
0.0 0.0 0.0
o.o o.o o.o
DICKENS PATTON SPRINGS
PATTON SPRINGS SCHO 0.0 0.0
o.o o.o
0.0 0.0
0.0 o.o
0 0
70 70
2.3 o.o o.o
13.2 o.o o.o
SPUR ISO SPUR JH·HS
1.8 1.8
0.0 0.0
6.5 6.5
4.4 4.4
6 6
189 189
3.2 3.2
17.6 17.6
DIMMIT ASHERTON ISO
ASHERTON H S 176 176
3.3 0.6 0.6
18.1 3.4 3.4
CARRIZO SPRINGS BIG WELLS EL CARRIZO SPRINGS H S
2.3
3.2
11.1
12.5
3.8
5.1
3.2
4.7
42 1
38
1, 145 34
778
3.7 2.9 4.9
20.1 16.4 26.0
NOTE: A DASH (·) INDICATES DATA ARE NOT REPORTED TO PROTECT STUDENT ANONYMITY.
59
APPENDIX B
1996-97 CAMPUS DETAIL BY DISTRICT
DROPOUT RATES BY ETHNICITY, ANNUAL DROPOUT RATE, AND ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
WHITE AFR. AM HISP ECON DIS 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 ESTIMATED
DROPOUT DROPOUT DROPOUT DROPOUT TOTAL 7-12 DROPOUT LONGITUDINAL
COUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS RATE RATE RATE RATE DROPOUTS ENROLLMENT RATE DROPOUT RATE
DIMMIT CARRIZO SPA INGS CARRIZO SPRINGS J H 3 333 0.9 5.3
DONLEY 2.0 11. 7
CLARENDON ISO 2.4 3.3 5.0 4.7 7 259 2.7 15.2
CLARENDON H s 3.9 4.a 7. 7 a.1 7 164 4.3 23.0
CLARENDON J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 95 0.0 o.o
HEDLEY ISO 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 a5 0.0 o.o HEDLEY SCHOOL 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 a5 0.0 0.0
DUVAL 1. 6 9.2 BENAVIDES ISO 0.0 0.0 2.1 1. 9 6 287 2.1 11.9
BENAVIDES H S 0.0 0.0 3.0 2.a 6 199 3.0 16.8
BENAVIDES J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 88 0.0 o.o QUAD DISTRICT ALTER 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 7 0.0 0.0
FREER ISO 2.0 0.0 1.a 0.5 9 490 1.a 10.5
FREER HS 3.1 0.0 2.9 o.a 9 311 2.9 16.1
FREER J H o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 179 0.0 0.0
SAN DIEGO ISO 0.0 0.0 1.2 1.5 9 745 1.2 7.0 BERNARDA JAIME J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 291 0.0 o.o QUAD DISTRICT ALTER 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 13 0.0 o.o SAN DIEGO H S 0.0 0.0 2.0 2.6 9 454 2.0 11. 3
EASTLAND 1. 5 a.a CISCO ISO 3.0 0.0 2.2 2.1 14 491 2.9 15.9
CISCO ALTEA ED CTR 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 39 0.0 0.0 CISCO H S 4.6 0.0 3.a 3.a 13 301 4.3 23.3
CISCO J H 1 166 0.6 3.6 SOLOMON SCH 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 6 0.0 0.0
EASTLAND ISO 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.6 5 641 o.a 4.6 EASTLAND H S 1.4 0.0 0.0 1.1 5 427 1.2 6.a EASTLAND MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 215 0.0 o.o
GORMAN ISO 2 224 0.9 5.2 GORMAN H S 2 224 0.9 5.2
RANGER ISO o.a 16.7 3.1 1.9 5 330 1.5 a.a RANGER H S o.a 16. 7 3.1 1.9 5 330 1.5 a.a
RISING STAR ISO 120 o.a 4.9 RISING STAR H S 120 o.a 4.9
ECTOR 3.1 17.1
ECTOR COUNTY IS 2.0 5.1 3.9 3.3 407 13,235 3.1 17 .1
A I M 27 .9 41.9 24.4 28.0 153 564 27 .1 85.0
ALTER ED CTR 0.0 4.0 5.a 2.7 9 206 4.4 23.5 BONHAM J H 0.9 0.0 0.9 0.5 10 1 ,227 o.a 4.a BOWIE J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 1 ,350 0.0 o.o CAREER CTR 3 633 0.5 2.a CROCKETT J H 1.0 0.0 1. 1 1. 1 13 1,296 1.0 5.9 ECTOR CO YOUTH CTR 0.0 11.8 a.5 11.3 6 79 7.6 37.7 ECTOR J H 1.4 3.4 2.4 1. 7 27 1 ,300 2.1 11.8
HOOD J H 1 1,248 0.1 0.5 NIMITZ J H 0.1 0.0 1. 1 0.6 5 1,228 0.4 2.4 ODESSA H S 1.a 0.0 2.4 2.1 45 2, 193 2.1 11. 7 OHS/SCH-WITHIN-A-SC 14.3 0.0 21. 7 17 .5 64 331 19.3 72.5 PERMIAN H S 0.4 1.5 1.6 2.2 20 2,285 0.9 5.1 PHS/SCH-WITHIN-A-SC 7.3 27.6 10.8 10.9 34 299 11 ,4 51.5 TEEN PARENT CTR 15.2 0.0 18.9 12.3 17 108 15.7 64.2
EDWARDS 0.5 2.a NUECES CANYON C 2 200 1.0 5.9
NUECES CANYON EL 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 64 0.0 0.0 NUECES CANYON H S 2 136 1.5 a.5
ROCKSPRINGS ISO 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 224 0.0 o.o ROCKSPRINGS EL 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 78 0.0 0.0 ROCKSPRINGS H S 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 146 0.0 o.o
NOTE: A DASH (-) INDICATES DATA ARE NOT REPORTED TO PROTECT STUDENT ANONYMITY.
60
COUNTY EL PASO
APPENDIX B 1996-97 CAMPUS DETAIL BY DISTRICT
DROPOUT RATES BY ETHNICITY, ANNUAL DROPOUT RATE, AND ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
DISTRICT
ANTHONY ISO
CANUTILLO ISO
CLINT ISO
El PASO ISO
FABENS ISO
SAN ELIZARIO IS
SOCORRO ISO
TORNILLO ISO
WHITE AFR. AM HISP ECON ors 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 ESTIMATED DROPOUT DROPOUT DROPOUT DROPOUT TOTAL 7.12 DROPOUT LONGITIJDINAL
CAMPUS RATE RATE RATE RATE DROPOUTS ENROLLMENT RATE 1.5
DROPOUT RATE 8.5
4 38a 1.1 6.2 ANTHONY H s 4 38a 1.1 6.2
1.5 16.7 2.4 1.5 47 1 ,942 2.4 13.7 ALTER SCH CANUTILLO H S CANUTILLO MIDDLE
40.0 a.a a.a
100.0 12.5 a.a
25. 7 a.6 1.4
21.7 a.6 1.2
31 7 9
115 1, 159
713
27.0 a.6 1.3
84.8 3.6 7.3
CARROLL T WELCH MIO CLINT ALTER CLINT H S CLINT J H EAST MONTANA MIDDLE MOUNTAIN VIEW H S
2.a a.a
1. 1 a.a 2.3 5.4
a.a a.a
a.a a.a a.a a.a
1.3 a.a
1.8 a.a a.a 1.5
a.9 a.a
1.6 a.a a.6 1. 1
38 a 3
13 a 6
16
2,896 315 124 767 204 655 90a
1.3 a.a 2.4 1.7 a.a a.9 1.8
7.6 a.a
13.7 9.8 a.a 5.4
10.2
ANDRESS H S AUSTIN H S BASSETI MIDDLE BOWIE H S BURGES H S CANYON HILLS MIDDLE
a.7 2.4 a.a a.a a.a a.a
1.4 1.7 a.a 3.3 a.a a.a
1.1 2.7 1.4 a.9 a.5 a.5
a.7 1.6 1.1 a.a a.5 a.5
313 6a 29 9
10 7 2
29,751 2,453 2,473
879 1,935 1,772
1a6
1.1 2.4 1.2 1.a a.5 a.4 a.3
6.2 13.8 6.8 6.a 3.1 2.4 1. 7
CHARLES MIDDLE a.a a.a a.a a.a a 892 a.a a.a COLDWELL El- INT CORONADO H S CROCKETI El·INT
a.a
a.a
a.a
a.a
a.a
a.a
a.a
a.a
a 2 a
137 1,996
262
a.a a.1 a.a
a.a a.6 a.a
DR MANUEL D HORNEDO EL PASO H S FRANKLIN H S
a.a a.a a.5
a.a a.a 2.9
a.a 1.5 1.2
a.a 1. 1 a.7
a 19 24
1,061 1,417 2,698
a.a 1.3 a.9
a.a 7.8 5.2
GUILLEN MIDDLE HAROLD WIGGS MIDDLE HENDERSON MIDDLE HIGHLAND SP ED HOUSTON El· INT IRVIN H S
a.a a.a a.a a.a a.a
a.a a.a a.a a.a a.a
a.a a.a a.6 a.a a.a
a.a a.a a.5 a.a a.a
a a 5 a a 4
1,058 782 837
65 273
2,476
a.a a.a a.6 a.a a.a a.2
a.a a.a 3.5 a.a a.a 1.a
JEFFERSON H S JUVENILE JUSTICE CT LINCOLN MIDDLE MACARTHUR EL-INT MAGOFFIN MIDDLE MOREHEAD MIDDLE RAYMOND l TELLES AC ROSS MIDDLE SCHOOL-AGE PARENT C
a.a
a.a
a.6 a.a a.a 25.0
a.a
a.a
5.a 7.1 a.a 16.7
a.a
a.a
a.7 1.a a.a 9.a
a.a
a.a
1.a a.1 a.a 5.6
4 a 4 a 4 5 5 a
22
1,391 48a 831 488 715 645 436 597 219
a.3 a.a a.5 a.a a.6 a.a 1. 1 a.a
10.0
1.7 a.a 2.9 a.a 3.3 4.6 6. 7 a.a
47.0 SILVA HEALTH MAGNET SUNSET H S TERRACE HILLS MIDDLE
a.a 21.0
a.a 17.4
a.a 21.9
a.a 18.3
a 96 2
679 443 745
a.a 21.7 a.3
a.a 76.9 1.6
FABENS A l T A PROG FABENS H S FABENS J H
a.a a.a a.a a.a
a.a a.a a.a a.a
1.8 21. 7 1.2 a.a
1.a 17.6 a.1 a.a
22 13 9 a
1,259 6a
763 468
1. 7 21. 7 1.2 a.a
10.0 76.9 6.9 a.a
SAN SAN SAN
ELIZARIO ALTER ELIZARIO H S ELIZARIO MIDDLE
a.a a.a a.a a.a
a.a a.a a.a a.a
2.1 19.4 1.4 a.a
1.4 11.6 1.3 a.a
31 19 12 a
1,497 10a 869 583
2.1 19.0 1.4 a.a
11.8 71.8 a.a a.a
AMERICAS H S a.5 a.a a.6 a.4 55
2 9,538 1, 184
a.6 a.2
3.4 1.a
CAMPESTRE El CAPT WALTER E CLARK a.a a.a a.a a.a a 51a a.a a.a HELEN BALL El KEYS ACAD MONlWOOO H S SALVADOR SANCHEZ MI SOCORRO H S SOCORRO MIDDLE WILLIAM SLIDER MIOOL
25.0 a.4 a.a a.a a.a
a.a a.a a.a a.a a.a
5.4 1.2 a.a a.2 a.a
4.9 1.1 a.a a.1 a.a
14 31 a 5 a 3
218 3,037
718 2,498
675 932~
6.4 1.a a.a a.2 a.a a.3
32.9 6.a a.a 1.2 a.a 1.9
3 303 1.a 5.B TORNILLO H S TORNILLO MIDDLE a.a a.a a.a a.a
3 a
182 122
1.6 a.a
9.5 a.a
NOTE: A DASH (·) INDICATES DATA ARE NOT REPORTED TO PROTECT STUDENT ANONYMITY.
61
APPENDIX B 1996-97 CAMPUS DETAIL BY DISTRICT
DROPOUT RATES BY ETHNICITY, ANNUAL DROPOUT RATE, AND ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
COUNTY
EL PASO
ELLIS
DISTRICT
YSLETA ISO
AVALON ISO
ENNIS ISO
FERRIS ISO
ITALY ISO
MAYPEARL ISO
MIDLOTHIAN ISO
MILFORD ISO
PALMER ISO
RED OAK ISO
WAXAHACHIE ISO
WHITE AFR. AM HISP ECON DIS 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 ESTIMATED DROPOUT DROPOUT DROPOUT DROPOUT TOTAL 7-12 DROPOUT LONGITUDINAL
CAMPUS RATE RATE RATE RATE DROPOUTS ENROLLMENT RATE DROPOUT RATE
1.2 1.5 2.2 1.0 511 24,485 2.1 11.9 ACAD OF SCIENCE/TECH ACAO SCI/TECH DROPOU BEL AIR ACCEL INSTR 21.4 0.0 20.0 13.3
2 4
41
129 242 210
1.6 1. 7
19.5
9.0 9.5
72.8 BELAIR HS 0.0 0.0 1. 7 1.4 38 2,323 1.6 9.4
CAMINO REAL MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 613 0.0 0.0
CESAR CHAVEZ ACAO 1 232 0.4 2.6 CHAVEZ DROPOUT PROG 1 66 1.5 8.8 DEL VALLE ACCEL INS 12.5 100.0 20.2 18.5 80 400 20.0 73.8 DEL VALLE H S 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.6 13 2,067 0.6 3.7
DESERT VIEW MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 663 0.0 0.0
DISTRICT HOMEBOUND 2 63 3.2 17.6 EASTWOOD ACCEL INST 5.3 0.0 2.6 0.0 9 311 2.9 16.1 EASTWOOD H S 0.7 1.3 1 .9 2.1 40 2,492 1.6 9.3
EASTWOOD KNOLLS EL 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 354 0.0 0.0
EASTWOOD MIDDLE 2 948 0.2 1. 3
HANKS ACCEL INSTR 10.3 7.9 8.1 5.6 49 581 8.4 41. 1
HILLCREST MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 724 0.0 0.0 INDIAN RIDGE MIDDLE 0.0 o.o 0.0 0.0 0 808 0.0 0.0 JMHANKSHS 0.0 0.0 0.7 1.1 15 2,926 0.5 3.0
PARKLAND ACCEL INST 4.8 11.9 11. 7 13.8 33 311 10.6 49.0
PARKLAND H S 0.0 0.0 1.6 0.9 11 1, 150 1.0 5.6
PARKLAND MIDDLE 0.0 o.o 0.0 0.0 0 752 0.0 0.0
PASOOALE EL 2 276 0. 7 4.3
RANCHLANO HILLS MIDD 2 528 0.4 2.3
RECOVERY PROG H S 33.3 0.0 18.2 0.0 29 152 19.1 71. 9 RIVERSIDE ACCEL INS 0.0 0.0 5.9 3.8 25 448 5.6 29.1
RIVERSIDE H S 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.7 13 1,574 0.8 4.9 RIVERSIDE MIDDLE 1 953 0.1 0.6 TEJAS SCHOOL OF CHOI 3 266 1.1 6.6 VALLEY VIEW MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 795 0.0 0.0 YSLETA ACCEL INSTR 20.0 0.0 19.6 9.1 67 344 19.5 72.7 YSLETA H S 0.0 0.0 1.4 1.5 27 2,013 1.3 7.8
YSLETA MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 475 0.0 0.0
0.5 3.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 125 0.0 0.0
AVALON SCHOOL 0.0 o.o 0.0 0.0 0 125 0.0 0.0
0.2 0.3 1.5 0.6 11 1,971 0.6 3.3 ENNIS H S 0.3 0.5 1.9 0.7 9 1,225 0.7 4.3 ENNIS J H 2 747 0.3 1.6
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 790 0.0 0.0 FERRIS H S 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 472 0.0 0.0 FERRIS J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 318 0.0 0.0
298 0.3 2.0
ITALY H S 298 0.3 2.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o 0 332 0.0 0.0 MAYPEARL H S 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 211 0.0 0.0 MAYPEARL MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 121 0.0 0.0
0.4 0.0 1.3 1.2 8 1, 727 0.5 2.8 MIDLOTHIAN H S 0.8 0.0 2.2 2.1 8 1,139 0.7 4.1 MIDLOTHIAN MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 588 0.0 0.0
3 125 2.4 13.6 MILFORD SCHOOL 3 125 2.4 13.6
4 437 0.9 5.4
PALMER H S 4 270 1.5 8.6 PALMER MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 169 0.0 0.0
1.1 0.0 1.3 1.1 19 1,846 1. 0 6.0 RED OAK H S 1.6 0.0 2.2 2.5 18 1J141 1 .6 9.1 RED OAK J H 1 705 0.1 0.9
0.1 0.7 0.8 0.6 9 2,600 0.3 2.1 WAXAHACHIE H S 0.0 0.4 1.4 0.6 5 1 ,630 0.3 1.8 WAXAHACHIE J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 916 0.0 0.0 WAXAHACHIE LEARNING 4 108 3.7 20.3
NOTE: A DASH (-) INDICATES DATA ARE NOT REPORTED TO PROTECT STUDENT ANONYMITY.
62
APPENDIX B
1996-97 CAMPUS DETAIL BY DISTRICT
DROPOUT RATES BY ETHNICITY, ANNUAL DROPOUT RATE, AND ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
COUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS
WHITE DROPOUT
RATE
AFR. AM. DROPOUT
RATE
HISP DROPOUT
RATE
ECON DIS DROPOUT
RATE
1996-97 TOTAL
DROPOUTS
1996-97 7-12
ENROLLMENT
1996-97 DROPOUT
RATE
ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
ERATH BLUFF DALE !SD
BLUFF DALE EL o.o 0.0
o.o 0.0
o.o 0.0
o.o 0.0
0 0
20 20
1.4 0.0 0.0
8.1 0.0 o.o
DUBLIN ISO DUBLIN H S DUBLIN J H PARIDAGM P A C
2.1 3.8 o.o 0.0
0.0 o.o 0.0 o.o
1.5 2.8 0.0 0.0
2.6 5.3 0.0 0.0
13 13
0 0
632 351 248
50
2.1 3.7 0.0 0.0
11. 7 20.3 0.0 0.0
HUCKABAY ISO HUCKABAY SCHOOL
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 o.o
o.o 0.0
0 0
113 113
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
LINGLEVILLE !SD LINGLEVILLE SCHOOL
2 2
92 92
2.2 2.2
12.4 12.4
MORGAN MILL ISO MORGAN MILL EL
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0 0
16 16
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
STEPHENVILLE IS STEPHENVILLE H s STEPHENVILLE J H SUMMER SKY ALTER
1.3 1.9
0.0
o.o 0.0
0.0
0.5 0.9
o.o
2.0 3.4
0.0
22 20
2 0
1,814 1,076
599 139
1.2 1.9 0.3 0.0
7 .1 10.7 2.0 o.o
FALLS CHILTON ISO
CHILTON SCHOOL 2.7 2.7
0.D 0.0
4.8 4.8
1. 7 1. 7
5 5
187 187
0.6 2.7 2.7
3.3 15.0 15.0
MARLIN ISO MARLIN H S MARLIN J H 0.0 O.D 0.0 0.0
3 3 0
764 502 262
0.4 0.6 0.0
2.3 3.5 0.0
ROSEBUD-LOTT IS ALTER ED ROSEBUD-LOTT H S ROSEBUD-LOTT J H
0.0 0.0 o.o o.o
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0 0 D 0
503 17
308 192
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 o.o o.o
WESTPHALIA ISO WESTPHALIA EL
o.o o.o
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0 0
12 12
0.0 0.0
o.o 0.0
FANNIN BONHAM ISO
BONHAM H S RATHER J H
0.5 0.7 0.0
4.4 7.4 0.0
D.O 0.0 o.o
1.0 1.6 0.0
9 9 0
996 663 336
0.8 0.9 1.4 0.0
4.8 5.3 7.9 0.0
DODD CITY !SD DODD CITY SCHOOL
0.0 0.0
0.D 0.0
0.D 0.D
0.0 0.0
0 0
119 119
0.0 O.D
0.0 o.o
ECTOR ISO ECTOR SCHOOL
0.0 0.0
o.o 0.0
o.o 0.0
0.0 0.0
0 0
100 100
o.o 0.0
0.D 0.0
HONEY GROVE !SD HONEY GROVE H S HONEY GROVE MIDDLE o.o 0.0 0.0 D.O
2 2 0
359 222 137
0.6 0.9 0.0
3.3 5.3 0.0
LEONARD ISO LEONARD H s LEONARD J H
1.5 2.2 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
o.o o.o 0.0
0.9 1.8 o.o
5 5 0
379 247 133
1.3 2.0 o.o
7.7 11.6 0.0
SAM RAYBURN !SD RAYBURN H s
224 224
0.4 0.4
2.7 2.7
SAVOY ISO SAVOY H S
2 2
148 148
1.4 1.4
7.8 7.8
TRENTON ISO TRENTON H S
186 186
0.5 0.5
3.2 3.2
NOTE: A OASH (-) INDICATES DATA ARE NOT REPORTED TO PROTECT STUDENT ANONYMITY.
63
APPENDIX B 1996-97 CAMPUS DETAIL BY DISTRICT
DROPOUT RATES BY ETHNICITY, ANNUAL DROPOUT RATE, AND ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
COUNTY
FAYETTE
FISHER
FLOYD
FOARD
FORT BEND
DISTRICT
FAYETTEVILLE IS
FLATONIA ISO
LA GRANGE ISO
ROUND TOP-CARMI
SCHULENBURG ISO
ROBY CONS ISO
ROTAN ISO
FLOYDADA ISO
LOCKNEY ISO
CROWELL ISO
FORT BEND ISO
LAMAR CONSOLIDA
WHITE AFR. AM HISP ECON DIS 1996-97 1996·97 1996-97 ESTIMATEO DROPOUT DROPOUT DROPOUT DROPOUT TOTAL 7-12 DROPOUT LONGITUDINAL
CAMPUS RATE RATE RATE RATE DROPOUTS ENROLLMENT RATE DROPOUT RATE
1. 1 6.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 119 0.0 0.0
FAYETTEVILLE H S 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 119 0.0 0.0
0.7 11.1 2.2 2.1 6 265 2.3 12.8 FLATONIA H S 0.7 11.1 2.2 2.1 6 265 2.3 12.8
0.9 1.9 1.4 1.9 11 1,024 1. 1 6.3 LA GRANGE H S 1.4 2.8 2.6 3.3 11 656 1. 7 9.7 LA GRANGE MIDDLE 0.0 o.o 0.0 0.0 0 368 0.0 0.0
o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 119 0.0 0.0 CARMINE H S 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 119 0.0 0.0
3 386 0.8 4.6 SCHULENBURG H s 3 278 1. 1 6.3 SCHULENBURG J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 108 0.0 0.0
0.3 1.5 1 160 0.6 3.7
ROBY EL 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 59 0.0 0.0 ROBY H S 1 101 1.0 5.8
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 233 0.0 0.0 HOBBS ALTER ED C0-0 0.0 o.o 0.0 0.0 0 6 0.0 0.0 ROTAN H S 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 160 0.0 0.0 ROTAN J H 0.0 o.o 0.0 0.0 0 68 0.0 0.0
1.8 10.1 1.1 0.0 2.8 2.7 12 573 2.1 11.9
CAPROCK CO LRN C0-0 40.0 0.0 23.5 23.5 6 27 22.2 77.9 FLOYDADA H S 0.0 0.0 2.8 2.6 6 364 1.6 9.5 FLOYDADA J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 190 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 2.2 2.6 5 394 1.3 7.4 LOCKNEY H S 0.0 0.0 3.5 4.3 5 254 2.0 11.2 LOCKNEY J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 140 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 169 0.0 0.0
CROWELL H S 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o 0 169 0.0 0.0
1 .0 5.6 0.5 1.2 2.2 1. 5 217 22,768 1. 0 5.6
CLEMENTS H S 0.4 0.0 0.6 0.0 10 2,688 0.4 2.2 DULLES H S 0.5 1. 1 2.8 1.9 22 2,388 0.9 5.4 DULLES MIDDLE 1 900 0.1 0. 7 FIRST COLONY MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 1,232 0.0 0.0 HODGES BEND MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 847 0.0 0.0 KEMPNER H S 0.3 1.7 1. 7 1.0 14 2,D04 0. 7 4.1 LAKE OLYMPIA MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 1,026 0.0 0.0 LAWRENCE E ELKINS H 1.9 2.9 6.4 4.5 80 2,652 3.0 16.8 MAGARIO GARCIA MIOO 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 953 0.0 0.0 MC AULIFFE MIDDLE 1 829 0.1 0.7 MISSOURI CITY MIDDL 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 820 0.0 0.0 PROGRESSIVE H S 2.7 11.5 5.6 15.2 19 259 7.3 36. 7 QUAIL VALLEY MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 610 0.0 0.0 STEPHEN F AUSTIN H 1.1 2.0 2.3 1.3 37 2,589 1.4 8.3 SUGAR LAND MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 t ,033 0.0 0.0 WILLOWRIDGE H S 0.0 0.9 4.1 1.8 33 2,345 1.4 8.2
0.3 1.4 1.9 1.3 80 6,585 1.2 7.1 B F TERRY H S 0.8 1.6 2.3 1.6 35 2,257 1.6 9.0 COMMUNITY CTR 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 43 0.0 0.0 FORT BENO CO ALTER 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 71 0.0 0.0 GEORGE J H 1 1,265 0.1 0.5 JUVENILE DETENT CTR o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 197 0.0 0.0 LAMAR CONS H S 0.2 2.8 2.9 2.2 30 1, 700 1.8 10.1 LAMAR GUIDANCE CTR 3 301 1.0 5.8 LAMAR J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 1,047 0.0 0.0 PLACE (16-21) 1.3 3.6 7.3 5.7 11 233 4.7 25.2 TRINITY LIFE CTR 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 47 0.0 0.0 YOUTH OPPORTUNITY U o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 22 0.0 0.0
NOTE: A DASH (-) INDICATES DATA ARE NOT REPORTED TO PROTECT STUDENT ANONYMITY.
64
APPENDIX B
1996-97 CAMPUS DETAIL BY DISTRICT
DROPOUT RATES BY ETHNICITY, ANNUAL DROPOUT RATE, AND ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
WHITE AFR. AM HISP ECON DIS 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 ESTIMATED DROPOUT DROPOUT DROPOUT DROPOUT TOTAL 7·12 DROPOUT LONGITUDINAL
COUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS RATE RATE RATE RATE DROPOUTS ENROLLMENT RATE DROPOUT RATE
FORT BEND NEEDVILLE ISO 1 1, 183 D.1 D.5 NEEDVILLE H S 1 765 D.1 D.8 NEEDVILLE MIDDLE D.D D.O 0.0 0.0 0 418 0.0 0.0
STAFFORD MSD 3 1, 128 0.3 1.6 STAFFORD H S 3 670 0.4 2.7 STAFFORD MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 o.o 0.0 0 458 0.0 0.0
FRANKLIN 0.7 4.0 MOUNT VERNON IS 0.5 1.8 1. 7 1.2 5 741 0.7 4.0
MT VERNON H S 0.7 2.9 3.6 2.5 5 469 1.1 6.2 MT VERNON J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o 0 272 o.o o.o
FREESTONE 0.5 3.0 FAIRFIELD ISO 4 792 0.5 3.0
FAIRFIELD H S 4 500 o.a 4.7 FAIRFIELD J H 0.0 0.0 o.o 0.0 0 292 o.o 0.0
TEAGUE ISO 591 0.2 1.0 TEAGUE H S 358 0.3 1.7 TEAGUE INT TEAGUE J H
WORTHAM ISO 3 198 1.5 a.a WORTHAM H S 3 133 2.3 12.8 WORTHAM MIDDLE o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 65 o.o 0.0
FRIO 2.2 12.6 DILLEY ISO 2.4 0.0 3,3 1.3 15 475 3.2 17.5
ALTER CTR 66.7 0.0 50.0 100.0 12 23 52.2 98.8 DILLEY H S 3 309 1.0 5.7 MARY HARPER MIDDLE o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 151 o.o 0.0
PEARSALL ISO 1.a 0.0 1.a 1.2 20 1, 106 1.a 10.4 PEARSALL H S 2.7 0.0 2.9 1.9 20 710 2.a 15.8 PEARSALL J H 0.0 0.0 o.o o.o 0 400 0.0 o.o
GAINES 0.9 5.4 LOOP ISO 0.0 o.o 0.0 0.0 0 94 0.0 0.0
LOOP SCHOOL 0.0 o.o 0.0 0.0 0 94 0.0 0.0
SEAGRAVES ISO 0.9 o.o 2.2 0.6 5 314 1.6 9.2 SEAGRAVES H s 3 186 1.6 9.3 SEAGRAVES J H 0.0 o.o 0.0 0.0 0 12a 0.0 0.0
SEMINOLE ISO 0.6 o.o 1.1 1.3 9 1, 126 o.a 4.7 SEMINOLE H S 0.5 0.0 1.a 1.6 7 663 1.1 6.2 SEMINOLE J H 2 424 0.5 2.a SEMINOLE SUCCESS CT o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 78 0.0 o.o
GALVESTON 1.2 7.1 CLEAR CREEK ISO 0.6 0.2 1.1 0.6 73 12,823 0.6 3.4
BROOKSIDE INT 2 751 0.3 1.6 CLEAR BROOK H S a.a 0.4 1.2 o.o 16 1,958 o.a 4.8 CLEAR CREEK H S 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.7 26 2,933 0.9 5.2 CLEAR LAKE H S 0.6 0.7 2.5 0.9 22 3,315 0.7 3.9 CLEAR LAKE INT 0.0 0.0 o.o 0.0 0 715 0.0 0.0 CLEAR VIEW ALTER 0.0 o.o o.o 0.0 0 291 0.0 0.0 CREEKSIDE INT 2 554 0.4 2.2 LEAGUE CITY INT 4 878 0.5 2.7 SEABROOK INT 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o 0 556 0.0 o.o SPACE CENTER INT 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o 0 763 0.0 0.0 WEBSTER INT 1 377 0.3 1.6
DICKINSON ISO 0.9 2.2 1.3 1.1 34 2,941 1.2 6.7 ABOUT FACE o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 48 0.0 0.0 DICKINSON H S 1.3 3.9 2.3 2.0 31 1, 736 1.a 10.3 GALVESTON CO DETENT o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 187 0.0 0.0 R D MCADAMS J H 3 1,013 0.3 1.8
FRIENDSWOOD ISO 0.5 0.0 0.9 1.5 12 2,213 0.5 3.2
NOTE: A DASH (-) INDICATES DATA ARE NOT REPORTED TO PROTECT STUDENT ANONYMITY.
65
APPENDIX B
1996-97 CAMPUS DETAIL BY DISTRICT
DROPOUT RATES BY ETHNICITY, ANNUAL DROPOUT RATE, AND ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
WHITE AFR. AM HISP ECON DIS 1996-97 1996·97 1996·97 ESTIMATEO
DROPOUT DROPOUT DROPOUT DROPOUT TOTAL 7-12 ORO POUT LONGITUDINAL
COUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS RATE RATE RATE RATE ORO POUTS ENROLLMENT RATE DROPOUT RATE
GALVESTON FRIENOSWOOD !SD FRIENDSWOOD H S 0.8 0.0 1.4 3.7 12 1 ,433 0.8 4.9 FRIENDSWOOD J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 780 0.0 o.o
GALVESTON ISO 2.2 2.6 2.5 1.7 107 4,489 2.4 13.5
ALTER SCH 10.3 6.6 5.9 4.3 13 186 7.0 35.3
AUSTIN MIDDLE 2 534 0.4 2.2
BALL H S 2.9 3.2 3.5 2.8 89 2,810 3.2 17.6
BOLIVAR EL 0.0 o.o 0.0 0.0 0 36 0.0 o.o CENTRAL MIDDLE 1 518 0.2 1.1
SPECIAL CTRS 2 80 2.5 14.1
WEIS MIDDLE o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 518 0.0 o.o
HIGH ISLAND ISO 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 202 0.0 o.o HIGH ISLAND H S 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o 0 145 0.0 o.o HIGH ISLAND MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 58 0.0 o.o
HITCHCOCK ISO 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o 0 761 0.0 o.o CROSBY MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 276 0.0 o.o HITCHCOCK H S 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 485 0.0 o.o
LA MARQUE ISO 2.0 1.9 1.9 1.6 46 2,389 1.9 11.0
LA MARQUE H S 2.4 2.6 2.8 2.2 41 1,599 2.6 14.4
LA MARQUE MIDDLE 1. 0 0.6 0.0 0.9 5 790 0.6 3.7
SANTA FE ISO 1.9 0.0 2.6 1.8 43 2, 168 2.0 11.3
SANTA FE H s 3.1 0.0 3. 7 3.8 43 1,359 3.2 17 .5
SANTA FE J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 809 0.0 0.0
TEXAS CITY ISO 1.5 2.3 2.0 1. 1 51 2,815 1.8 10.4
ALTER SCH 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 205 0.0 0.0 BLOCKER MIDDLE 0.5 0.5 1.2 1. 1 8 1,019 0.8 4.6 TEXAS CITY H S 2.1 3.6 2.6 1. 0 43 1J758 2.4 13.8
GARZA 1. 5 8.9
POST ISO 1.2 0.0 3.0 0.4 9 487 1. 8 10.6
POST H S 1.8 0.0 4.7 0 .7 9 317 2.8 15.9
POST MIDDLE 0.0 o.o 0.0 0.0 0 170 0.0 o.o
SOUTHLAND ISO 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 105 0.0 o.o SOUTHLAND H S o.o 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 105 0.0 o.o
GILLESPIE 1.0 5.9
DOSS CONS CSD 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 7 0.0 0.0
DOSS EL 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 7 0.0 o.o
FREDERICKSBURG 0.5 16.7 2.3 0.3 14 1,417 1.0 5.8 ALTER SCH 0.0 o.o 0.0 0.0 0 69 0.0 o.o FREDERICKSBURG H S 0.7 50.0 3.7 0.7 13 916 1.4 8.2 FREDERICKSBURG MIOOL 1 464 0.2 1. 3
HARPER ISO 2 175 1.1 6 7 HARPER H S 2 114 1. 8 10. 1 HARPER MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 61 0.0 0 0
GLASSCOCK 0.5 2.9 GLASSCOCK COUNT 207 0.5 2.9
GLASSCOCK COUNTY H s 207 0 5 2.9
GOLIAD 0 3 1.6 GOLIAD ISO 2 739 0 3 1.6
GOLIAD H S 2 464 0.4 2.6 GOLIAD MI ODLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 275 0.0 o.o
GONZALES 1. 7 9.6 GONZALES ISO 0.5 0.6 2.7 0.4 18 1,272 1.4 8.2
GONZALES ALTER 4 136 2.9 16.4
GONZALES H S 0.3 1.2 4.1 0.8 14 750 1.9 10.7
GONZALES J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 482 0.0 0.0
NOTE: A DASH (-) INDICATES DATA ARE NOT REPORTED TO PROTECT STUDENT ANONYMITY.
66
APPENDIX B 1996-97 CAMPUS DETAIL BY DISTRICT
DROPOUT RATES BY ETHNICITY, ANNUAL DROPOUT RATE, AND ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
WHITE AFR. AM HISP ECON DIS 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 ESTIMATED DROPOUT DROPOUT DROPOUT DROPOUT TOTAL 7-12 DROPOUT LONGITUDINAL
COUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS RATE RATE RATE RATE DROPOUTS ENROLLMENT RATE DROPOUT RATE
GONZALES NIXON-SMILEY CO 0.5 0.0 2.5 1 .4 8 499 1. 6 9.2 ALTER ED CTR o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 31 0.0 0.0 NIXON-SMILEY H S 0.8 0.0 4. 1 2.4 8 307 2.6 14. 7 NIXON-SMILEY MIDDLE 0.0 a.a 0.0 a.a 0 192 o.a 0.0
WAELDER ISO 0.0 7.4 4.4 1.3 5 99 5. 1 26. 7 WAELDER H S 0.0 7.4 4.4 1.3 5 99 5. 1 26. 7
GRAY 1. 1 6.6 LEFORS !SD o.o a.a a.o a.a a 78 0.0 a.a
LEFORS SCHOOL 0.0 o.o o.o 0.0 0 78 0.0 0.0
MCLEAN ISO 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 126 0.0 0.0 MCLEAN SCHOOL 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 126 0.0 o.o
PAMPA ISO 0.9 1.9 2.8 2.1 24 1,935 1 .2 7 .2 P L C-PAMPA LEARNIN 11.6 0.0 21.9 12.3 18 132 13.6 58.5 PAMPA H S 0.3 2.9 0.6 1. 5 6 1, 185 0.5 3.0 PAMPA MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 653 0.0 0.0
GRAYSON 1.6 9.3 BELLS ISO 2 383 0.5 3. 1
BELLS H S 2 246 0.8 4.8 PRITCHARD J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 137 0.0 0.0
COLLINSVILLE IS 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 244 0.0 0.0 COLLINSVILLE H S o.o o.o 0.0 0.0 0 244 0.0 0.0
DENISON ISO 1.5 2.0 0.0 1 .5 37 2,220 1. 7 9.6 B MCDANIEL MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 821 0.0 0.0 DENISON H S 2.3 3.1 0.0 2.9 36 1,397 2.6 14.5 PATHWAYS H S 1 61 1. 6 9.4
GUNTER ISO 1 278 0.4 2. 1 GUNTER H S 1 205 0.5 2.9 GUNTER J H 0.0 o.o 0.0 0.0 0 73 0.0 0.0
HOWE ISO 2 464 0.4 2.6 HOWE H S 2 293 0.7 4.0 HOWE MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 171 o.o 0.0
POTTSBORO ISO 2.3 0.0 0.0 5.0 15 657 2.3 12.9 POTTSBORO H S 3.6 0.0 o.o 9.7 15 418 3.6 19.7 POTTSBORO MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 239 0.0 0.0
S AND S CONS IS 2 425 0.5 2.8 SANOSCONSHS 2 282 0.7 4.2 S AND S CONS MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 o.o o.o 0 143 0.0 0.0
SHERMAN ISO 1.9 2.8 4.8 2.2 68 2,952 2.3 13.1 ALTER LEARNING CTR 6.2 3.6 13.3 0.0 13 218 6.0 30.8 DOUGLASS SP ED PINER MIDDLE 1 .3 0.5 3. 1 1.6 14 985 1.4 8.2 SHERtlAN H S 1. 7 1 .9 5.0 2.5 34 , '730 2.0 11.2 T M C BEHAVORIAL HLT TRI CO JUVENILE DET 1. 1 13.6 0.0 4.5 7 145 4.8 25. 7
TIOGA ISO 0.0 0.0 o.o o.o 0 38 0.0 0.0 TIOGA EL 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 38 0.0 0.0
TOM BEAN ISO 4 410 1 .0 5.7 TOM BEAN H S 4 273 1 .5 8.5 TOM BEAN MIDDLE o.o o.o 0.0 0.0 0 137 o.o 0.0
VAN ALSTYNE ISO 1.4 0.0 0.0 1.6 6 456 1.3 7.6 VAN ALSTYNE H S 2.2 0.0 0.0 3. 1 6 286 2. 1 12.0 VAN ALSTYNE J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 170 0.0 0.0
NOTE: A DASH (·) INDICATES DATA ARE NOT REPORTED TO PROTECT STUDENT ANONYMITY.
67
APPENDIX B 1996-97 CAMPUS DETAIL BY DISTRICT
DROPOUT RATES BY ETHNICITY, ANNUAL DROPOUT RATE, AND ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
COUNTY
GRAYSON
GREGG
GRIMES
GUADALUPE
DISTRICT
WHITESBORO !SD
WHITEWRIGHT ISO
GLADEWATER ISO
KILGORE ISO
LONGVIEW ISO
PINE TREE ISO
SABINE ISO
SPRING HILL ISO
WHITE OAK ISO
ANDERSON SHIRO
IOLA ISO
NAVASOTA !SD
RICHARDS ISO
MARION ISO
NAVARRO ISO
SCHERTZ-CIBOLO
CAMPUS
WHITE DROPOUT
RATE
AFR. AM DROPOUT
RATE
HISP DROPOUT
RATE
ECON DIS DROPOUT
RATE
1996-97 TOTAL
DROPOUTS
1996-97 7-12
ENROLLMENT
1996-97 DROPOUT
RATE
ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
WHITESBORO WHITESBORO
H S MIDDLE
1.4 2.0
D.D 0.0
5.3 7 .1
2.5 3.6
11 10
1
734 478 256
1.5 2.1 0.4
8.7 11.9 2.3
WHITEWRIGHT H S WHITEWRIGHT MIDDLE 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0
2 2 0
313 203 110
0 6 1 .0 0 0
3.8 5.8 0.0
GLADEWATER GLADEWATER
H S MIDDLE
1.6 2.5 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
2.2 3.6 0.0
0 8 1 .4 0 0
14 14
0
1 ,099 683 416
1.2 1. 3 2.0 0.0
7.0 7.4
11. 7 0.0
DANVILLE ALTERNATIV ELDER COOP ALTER SC KILGORE H S MAUDE LAIRD MIDDLE
0.9 3.8 0 0 0 7 0 0
0.7 3.4 0.0 0.8 0.0
0.9 0.0 0.0 1. 7 0.0
0.9 3.1 0.0 1.6 0.0
17 8 0 9 0
2, 114 219 187
1J125 638
0.8 3.7 0.0 0.8 0.0
4.7 20.0 0.0 4. 7 0.0
FOREST PARK MIDDLE FOSTER MIDDLE JUDSON MIDDLE JUVENILE DETENT CTR LONGVIEW H S SP ED ANNEX
1 .1 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.6
1.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.1
1. 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.9
1.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.2
51 0 0 0 0
50 1
3,906 380 534 439
87 2,565
43
1. 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1. 9 2.3
7.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
11.1 13.2
PINE TREE H S PINE TREE J H PINE TREE MIDDLE
0.7 1.5
0.0
2.5 4.0
0.0
1. 4 4.2
0 0
1.5 4.5
0.0
22 21
1 0
2,466 1, 106
935 448
0.9 1.9 0.1 0.0
5.2 10.9 0.6 0.0
SABINE H s SABINE J H
1.4 2.1 0.0
4.6 6.2 0.0
0 0 0 0 0 0
3.0 5.2 0.0
12 12
0
673 456 217
1.8 2.6 0.0
10.2 14.6 0.0
SPRING SPRING
HILL H s HILL J H
1.5 2.4 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
0 0 0 0 0 0
2.0 4.2 0.0
11 11
0
788 486 302
1. 4 2.3 0.0
8.1 12.6 0.0
WHITE OAK WHITE OAK
H S MIDDLE
1.5 2.4 0.0
5.0 7. 1 0.0
0.0 0 0 0.0
2.2 4.3 0.0
10 10
0
643 405 238
1 .6 2 5 0 0
9.0 13.9 0.0
ANDERSON JH/HS 3 3
270 270
.5
.1
.1
8.4 6.5 6.5
IOLA H S 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0 0 0 0
0.0 0.0
0 0
291 2S1
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
NAVASOTA H s NAVASOTA J H
1.3 2.0 0.0
2.8 4.5 0.0
1 .7 2 6 0. 0
1.5 2.9 0.0
27 27
0
1,508 941 567
1. 8 2. 9 0.0
10.3 16.0 0.0
RICHARDS H s 76 76
.3
.3 7,6 7.6
MARION MARION
H S MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0
563 334 229
1 .4 0 2 0 3 0.0
8.3 1.1 1.8 0.0
NAVARRO H S NAVARRO MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
3 3 0
396 238 158
0 8 1 .3 0.0
4.5 7.3 0.0
ENHANCED LEARNING CT 0.5 0.6 1.3 0.7 20
3 2,642
93 0.8 3.2
4.5 17 .9
NOTE: A DASH (-) INDICATES DATA ARE NOT REPORTED TO PROTECT STUDENT ANONYMITY.
68
APPENDIX B
1996-97 CAMPUS DETAIL BY DISTRICT
DROPOUT RATES BY ETHNICITY, ANNUAL DROPOUT RATE, AND ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
WHITE AFR. AM HISP ECON DIS 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 ESTIMATED DROPOUT DROPOUT DROPOUT DROPOUT TOTAL 7-12 DROPOUT LONGITUDINAL
COUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS RATE RATE RATE RATE DROPOUTS ENROLLMENT RATE DROPOUT RATE
GUADALUPE SCHERTZ-CIBOLO RAY D CORBETT J H 1 942 0.1 0.6 SAMUEL CLEMENS H S 0.7 0.0 1.9 1. 5 16 1,646 1.0 5.7
SEGUIN ISO 1.1 2.6 3.1 2.4 76 3,546 2.2 12.5 BRIESEMEISTER MIDDL 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 737 o.o o.o JUVENILE DETENT CTR 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 99 o.o 0.0 MERCER & BLUMBERG L 16.4 13.3 27.4 25.4 50 21a 22.9 79.1 SAEGERT MIDDLE 1 551 0.2 1.1 SEGUIN H S 0.6 3.1 1.5 2.1 27 2, 161 1.2 7.3 SMITH DISCIPLINARY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 230 0.0 0.0
HALE 1.1 6.4 ABERNATHY ISO 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 429 0.0 0.0
ABERNATHY ACAO 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 19 0.0 0.0 ABERNATHY H S 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 267 0.0 0.0 ABERNATHY MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 154 0.0 0.0
COTTON CENTER I o.o o.o 0.0 0.0 0 99 0.0 0.0 COTTON CENTER SCHOO 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 99 0.0 0.0
HALE CENTER ISO 2 374 0.5 3.2 HALE CENTER HS 2 237 a.a 5.0 HALE CENTER MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 137 0.0 0.0
PETERSBURG ISO 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 201 0.0 o.o CAPROCK CO LRN CTR 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 a 0.0 0.0 PETERSBURG H S 0.0 0.0 o.o 0.0 0 193 0.0 0.0
PLAINVIEW ISO 0.5 1.0 ·2.0 1.3 42 2,923 1.4 a.3 CORONADO J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 543 0.0 0.0 ESTACADO J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 495 0.0 0.0 HOUSTON SCHOOL 4.7 6.3 a.a 3.a 15 236 6.4 32.6 PLAINVIEW H S 0.5 0.9 2.4 2.2 27 1, 719 1.6 9.1
HALL 0.6 3. a LAKEVIEW ISO 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 40 0.0 0.0
LAKEVIEW SCHOOL 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 40 0.0 0.0
MEMPHIS ISO 3 280 1.1 6.3 MEMPHIS H S 3 1a7 1. 6 9.3 MEMPHIS MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 93 0.0 0.0
TURKEY-QUITAQUE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 151 o.o 0.0 VALLEY SCHOOL 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 151 0.0 0.0
HAMILTON 1.0 6.1 HAMILTON ISO 1 435 0.2 1.4
HAMILTON EL-J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 163 0.0 0.0 HAMILTON H S 1 2'2 0.4 2.2
HICO ISO 2.6 0.0 0.0 2.7 7 327 2.1 12.2 HICO H S 2.6 0.0 0.0 2.7 7 327 2.1 12.2
HANSFORD 1.3 7.4 GRUVER ISO 2 223 0.9 5.3
GRUVER H s 2 142 1.4 a.2 GRUVER J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 a1 0.0 0.0
PRINGLE-MORSE C 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 22 0.0 0.0 PRINGLE-MORSE EL-J 0.0 o.o 0.0 0.0 0 22 0.0 0.0
SPEARMAN ISO 1.2 0.0 2.5 2.3 6 381 1.6 9.1 SPEAJlMAN H S 1. 7 0.0 4.2 4.0 6 251 2.4 13.5 SPEAJlMAN J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 130 0.0 0.0
HARDEMAN a.a 4.5 CHILLICOTHE ISO 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 137 0.0 0.0
CHILLICOTHE H S 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 137 0.0 0.0
NOTE: A DASH (·) INDICATES DATA ARE NOT REPORTED TO PROTECT STUDENT ANONYMITY.
69
APPENDIX B 1996-97 CAMPUS DETAIL BY DISTRICT
DROPOUT RATES BY ETHNICITY, ANNUAL DROPOUT RATE, AND ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
COUNTY
HARDEMAN
HARDIN
HARRIS
DISTRICT
QUANAH ISO
HARDIN-JEFFERSO
KOUNTZE ISO
LUMBERTON ISO
SILSBEE ISO
WEST HARDIN COU
ALOINE ISO
ALIEF ISO
CHANNELVIEW ISO
CROSBY ISO
CYPRESS-FAIRBAN
WHITE AFR. AM HISP ECON DIS 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 ESTIMATED ORO POUT DROPOUT DROPOUT DROPOUT TOTAL 7-12 DROPOUT LONGITUDINAL
CAMPUS RATE RATE RATE RATE DROPOUTS ENROLLMENT RATE DROPOUT RATE
4 385 1. 0 6.1 QUANAH H S 4 247 1 .6 9.3 TRAVIS MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 138 0.0 o.o
1.0 5. 7 0.6 1.2 0.0 0.9 8 1,213 0.7 3 9
GULF COAST H S 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 6 0.0 0 0 HARDIN-JEFFERSON H 0.9 1.9 0.0 1.9 8 772 1.0 6. 1 HARDIN/CHAMBERS CTR HENOERSON J H
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0 0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0 0
11 439
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
2.1 1.9 0 0 0.5 14 691 2.0 11 .6 KOUNTZE H S 3.4 3.0 0 0 0.9 14 432 3.2 17.9 KOUNTZE MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 259 0.0 0.0
4 1,690 0.2 1.4 HARDIN COUNTY ALTER 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 42 0.0 0.0 LUMBERTON H S 4 1, 101 0.4 2.2 LUMBERTON MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 565 0.0 0.0
1.1 2.0 0.0 1.2 23 1,804 1.3 7.4 SILSBEE H S 1. 7 3.0 0.0 2.0 23 1, 173 2.0 11.2 SILSBEE MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 631 0.0 0.0
1.6 0.0 0.0 3.8 6 372 1.6 9.3 WEST HARDIN H s 2.5 0.0 0.0 6.5 6 244 2.5 13.9 WEST HARDIN J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 128 0.0 o.o
1. 8 10.6 2.2 2.7 2.7 1.4 532 20,780 2.6 14.4
ALDINE H S 2.8 2.3 2.7 1.4 76 3,075 2.5 13.9 ALDINE MIDDLE 3 1 ,044 0.3 1. 7 CARVER CONTEMP H S 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 430 0.0 0.0 CHESTER WNIMITZ H 1.2 1.2 3.3 1.8 49 2,788 1 .8 10.1 DREW ACAD 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 175 0.0 0.0 EISENHOWER H S 1.5 3.7 3.4 2.5 115 3,504 3.3 18.1 HAMBRICK MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 1 ,085 0.0 0.0 HOFFMAN MIDDLE 0.0 0.9 1. 0 0.6 10 1 ,300 0.8 4.5 LANE SCH MACARTHUR H S 3.5 1. 3 2.9 2.2 79 3,001 2.6 14.8 NIGHT H S 23.6 30.1 22. 1 24.3 187 736 25.4 82.8 PARKER INT PROJECT RECOVERY 9.1 2.7 6.2 2.0 11 219 5.0 26.6 SHOTWELL MIDDLE 1 1,031 0.1 0.6 STOVALL MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 1,257 0.0 0.0 T S GRANTHAM MIDDLE 1 1, 112 0.1 0.5 TEAGUE MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 1 ,063 0.0 0.0
0.9 1.3 1.9 0.9 222 16,934 1.3 7.6 AOMIN SERVICES 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 6 0.0 0.0 ALBRIGHT MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 884 0.0 o.o ALIEF LEARNING CTR 4.9 3.9 2.9 4.8 47 1,294 3.6 19.9 ALIEF MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 1,022 0.0 0.0 DON P KILLOUGH MIDDL 1 1,388 0.1 0.4 E A OLLE MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 1. 1 0.4 5 1, 139 0.4 2.6 ELSIK H S 1.1 0.8 2.9 1. 1 73 4,875 1.5 8.7 HASTINGS H S 0.8 2.2 2.7 1.6 90 4,933 1. 8 10.5 JAMES HOLUB MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 1 ,097 0.0 0.0 KERR H S 0.6 1.3 1. 7 0.0 5 422 1.2 6.9 O'DONNELL MIDDLE 1 1 ,024 0.1 0.6
0.3 0.3 0.1 0.2 7 2,829 0.2 1.5 CHANNELVIEW H S 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.4 7 1 ,677 0.4 2.5 ENDEAVOR LEARNING C 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 400 0.0 0.0 JOHNSON J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 1 ,007 0.0 0.0
1.2 1 .8 1.2 1. 7 26 1,924 1.4 7.8 CROSBY H S 1. 7 3.0 1 .0 2.2 23 1,208 1.9 10.9 CROSBY MIDDLE 3 716 0.4 2.5
0.7 0.8 1.6 1.3 206 24,083 0.9 5.0 ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR c 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 73 0.0 o.o ALTEA LAN CTR 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 418 0.0 0.0 ARNOLD J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 992 0.0 0.0
NOTE: A DASH (-) INDICATES DATA ARE NOT REPORTED TO PROTECT STUDENT ANONYMITY.
70
APPENDIX B
1996-97 CAMPUS DETAIL BY DISTRICT
DROPOUT RATES BY ETHNICITY, ANNUAL DROPOUT RATE, ANO ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
WHITE AFR. AM HISP ECON DIS 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 ESTIMATED DROPOUT DROPOUT DROPOUT DROPOUT TOTAL 7-12 DROPOUT LONGITUDINAL
COUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS RATE RATE RATE RATE DROPOUTS ENROLLMENT RATE DROPOUT RATE
HARRIS CYPRESS-FAIRBAN BLEYL J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 848 0.0 o.o CAMPBELL J H o.o o.o 0.0 0.0 0 778 o.o 0.0 CARLTON PRE-VOC CTR 0.0 0.0 o.o o.o 0 26 0.0 o.o COOK J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 1,658 0.0 0.0 CY-FAIR H S 0.9 0.0 3.7 1.8 28 2,469 1.1 6.6 CYPRESS CREEK H s 0.3 0.8 1.1 1.4 12 2,607 0.5 2.7 CYPRESS FALLS H s 0.5 1. 1 1.6 1.4 27 3,500 o.a 4.5 DEAN INT 1 0 o.o 0.0 HAMILTON INT 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 887 0.0 0.0 JERSEY VILLAGE H S 1.0 1. 5 1.a 1 .9 40 3,026 1. 3 7. 7 LABAY J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 932 0.0 0.0 LANGHAM CREEK H s 1.9 1. a 3.5 3.5 74 3,430 2.2 12.3 THORNTON J H o.o o.o 0.0 0.0 0 780 0.0 0.0 TRUITT J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 1,237 o.o 0.0 WATKINS J H 1 852 0.1 0.7 WINOFERN H S 5.5 0.0 4.9 6.3 23 486 4.7 25.2
DEER PARK ISO o.a 1.6 1.4 1.2 51 5,769 0.9 5.2 BONNETIE J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o 0 510 0.0 0.0 DEEPWATER J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 487 0.0 0.0 DEER PARK H S 0.6 0.0 1.6 1. 9 27 3,551 o.a 4.5 DEER PARK J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o 0 632 o.o o.o FAIRMONT J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 432 o.o 0.0 HARRIS CO J J A E P WOLTERS LEARNING CTR
GALENA PARK ISO 2.4 1.4 3.0 1.a 2oa B,472 2.5 13.9 ACE CTR 25.2 22.9 25.7 20.0 SS 220 25.0 82.2 CUNNINGHAM MIDDLE 1 951 0.1 0.6 GALAVIZ ACADEMY GALENA PARK H S 3.6 3.7 4.3 3.3 74 1, 799 4.1 22.3 GALENA PARK MIDDLE 2 790 0.3 1. 5 HIGH POINT H S NORTH SHORE H S 0.9 1.1 3.7 2.5 66 3,442 1.9 11.0 NORTH SHORE MIDDLE 0.4 0.0 o.a 0.2 6 1, 104 0.5 3.2 WOODLAND ACRES MIDD 0.0 0.0 o.o 0.0 0 295 0.0 0.0
GEORGE I • SANCH 13.3 7.1 8.2 7.1 55 669 a.2 40.2 GEORGE I SANCHEZ H 13.3 7.1 a.2 7 .1 55 669 a.2 40.2
GIRLS & BOYS PR 0.0 0.0 o.o 0.0 0 237 0.0 0.0 GIRLS & BOYS PREP A o.o o.o 0.0 0.0 0 237 0.0 0.0
GOOSE CREEK ISO 0.9 1.4 1.1 0.9 a6 8,314 1.0 6.1 ALTER SCH 6.5 28.6 7.7 a.3 13 143 9.1 43.6 BAYTOWN J H 1 585 0.2 1.0 CEDAR BAYOU J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 652 0.0 0.0 GENTRY J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 616 0.0 0.0 HIGHLANDS J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 475 0.0 0.0 HORACE MANN J H 2 69a 0.3 1. 7 KILGORE SP ED CTR 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 32 o.o o.o LEE H S 1.1 2.1 0.9 1.4 30 2,449 1.2 "7. 1 NIGHT SCHOOL o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 244 0.0 0.0 SCH COMMUNITY GUID 1.6 1.a 2.a 0.0 5 229 2.2 12.4 STERLING H S 1.2 1.0 1. 7 1.5 35 2,746 1.3 7.4
HOUSTON ISO 1.2 3.2 3.1 1.a 2,522 88,591 2.a 15.9 ABC CTR 0.0 23.5 12.5 40.0 5 27 18.5 70.7 ATIUCKS MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 799 0.0 0.0 AUSTIN H S a.5 1.1 4.2 2.a 131 3,200 4.1 22.2 BARBARA JORDAN H s 2 1,343 0.1 0.9 BELLAIRE H S 1.0 1.1 4.3 4.1 64 3,304 1.9 11. 1 BELLFORT ALTER MIDD o.o 5.1 5.3 2.2 8 159 5.0 26.6 BLACK MIDDLE 1.2 0.0 1.3 1.0 7 767 0.9 5.4 BURBANK MIDDLE 1.a 0.0 1.7 1.0 16 1,045 1.5 a.a BURNET BAYLAND H S 1 194 0.5 3.1 CENTRIPET PROJECT M 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 5 0.0 0.0 CHRYSALIS MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 66 0.0 0.0 CLIFTON MIDDLE 3 799 0.4 2.2 COMMUNITY SERVICES 2.2 2.2 1.9 1.3 31 1,478 2.1 11.9 CONTEMPORARY LAN CT 11.1 9.1 5.7 a.1 62 721 a.6 41.7 CONTEMPORARY LAN CT 0.0 5.4 5.7 4.1 14 265 5.3 27.8 CRITIENTON MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 12 0.0 0.0 CULLEN MIDDLE 4 720 0.6 3.3 DAVIS H S 2.6 1.3 1.9 1.1 37 2,035 1.a 10.4 DEADY MIDDLE 0.0 5.5 2.1 2.6 29 1,259 2.3 13.1 DEBAKEY H S FOR HEA 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 627 0.0 0.0 DOWLING MIDDLE 0.0 0.7 0.6 0.9 7 1,046 0.7 4.0
NOTE: A DASH (·) INDICATES DATA ARE NOT REPORTED TO PROTECT STUDENT ANONYMITY.
71
APPENDIX B
1996-97 CAMPUS DETAIL BY DISTRICT
DROPOUT RATES BY ETHNICITY, ANNUAL DROPOUT RATE, AND ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
WHITE AFR. AM HISP ECON DIS 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 ESTIMATED DROPOUT DROPOUT DROPOUT DROPOUT TOTAL 7-12 DROPOUT LONGITUDINAL
COUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS RATE RATE RATE RATE DROPOUTS ENROLLMENT RATE DROPOUT RATE
HARRIS HOUSTON ISO ED LAN ENRICHMENT C 7.6 16.2 13.4 16.7 290 2,028 14.3 60.4 EDISON MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 1. 7 1. 9 18 1,073 1. 7 9.7 EMPLOYMENT TRAINING 6.a 14.5 14.6 6.2 187 1,312 14.3 60.3 FLEMING MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 683 0.0 0.0 FLORENCE CRITTENTON 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 102 0.0 0.0 FOLEY'S ACADEMY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 164 0.0 0.0 FONDREN MIDDLE 3 1,022 0.3 1.a FONVILLE MIDDLE 1 796 0.1 o.a FURR H S 1 .4 2.9 4.4 4.6 66 1, 706 3.9 21.1 GRADY MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 456 0.0 0.0 GREGORY-LINCOLN ED 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 517 0.0 0.0 GULF SHORES ALTER 2 312 0.6 3.a H P CARTER H S 0.0 12.9 14.3 11.5 39 303 12.9 56.3 HAMILTON MIDDLE 1.a 0.0 o.a o.a 7 906 o.a 4.6 HARPER SCH 0.0 10.4 6.4 9.1 13 152 a.6 41.5 HARRIS CO YOUTH VIL 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 409 0.0 0.0 HARTMAN MIDDLE 3 961 0.3 1.9 HCC LIFE SKILLS PROG 1 21 4.a 25.4 HOGG MIDDLE 1.4 0.0 0.7 0.7 7 1,001 0.7 4.1 HOLLAND MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.6 5 790 0.6 3. 7 JACKSON MIDDLE 0.0 3.2 1. 0 1.3 11 1,066 1 .o 6.0 JOHNSTON MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 1,002 0 0 0.0 JONES H S 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 1J714 0.0 0.0 JUVENILE DETENT CTR 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o 0 2,236 0.0 0.0 KASHMERE H S 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 12 1,242 1 .0 5. 7 KAY ON-GOING ED CTR 0.0 5.3 5.3 3.6 12 229 5.2 27 .6 KEY MIDDLE 0.0 0.6 1. 4 0.2 6 777 o.a 4.5 L A T P 0.0 50.0 14.0 10.0 3a 262 14.5 60.9 L E A P 25.0 31.5 32.5 22.4 259 821 31 .5 89. 7 LAMAR H S 0.3 0.2 2.0 1.3 29 3, 112 0.9 5.5 LANIER MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 982 0.0 0.0 LAW ENFCMT-CRIM JUST 2 840 0.2 1.4 LEE H S 0.6 o.a 1 .a 0.9 48 3,524 1.4 7.9 LONG MIDDLE 0.0 0.7 0.9 0.5 10 1,344 0.7 4.4 MC TC 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 122 0.0 0.0 M C WILLIAMS MIDDLE 0.0 o.a 0.9 0.7 6 739 o.a 4.a MADISON H S 2.2 o.a 3.5 1.0 32 2, 106 1.5 a.a MARSHALL MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.7 a 959 o.a 4.9 MCCARDELL ACAD 3 97 3.1 17 .2 MCREYNOLDS MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 1.9 1. 7 10 639 1.6 9.0 MILBY H S 3.1 o.a 2.3 2.a 83 3,794 2.2 12.4 NIGHT H S 50.0 0.0 12.9 27 .3 17 138 12.3 54.6 NINETH GR SKILL ENH 0.0 3.0 2.5 3.1 5 180 2.a 15.6 ON-GOING MIDDLE 3 48 6.3 32.1 PATRICK HENRY MIDDL 4.2 2.7 2.6 3.1 23 821 2.a 15. 7 PERFOR & VIS ARTS H 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 668 0.0 0.0 PERSHING MIDDLE 2 1, 186 0.2 1.0 R E A D COMMISSION 24.0 24.5 44.4 40.7 198 501 39.5 95.1 REAGAN H S 1.6 1 .a 1. 7 1.5 42 2,460 1. 7 9.a REVERE MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 1J180 0.0 o.o RICE SCH 7.9 2.6 o.a 0.0 17 442 3.a 21 .0 RIPLEY ALTER PROG 9.a 11 .8 a.9 20.0 39 375 10.4 48.3 RIPLEY HOUSE ALTER 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 3a 0.0 0.0 RUSK MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 113 0.0 0.0 RYAN MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 775 0.0 0.0 SAM HOUSTON H S 0.0 1 .o 1.3 0.9 43 3,574 1.2 7.0 SCARBOROUGH H S 1.7 1.6 2.5 0.9 26 1 ,328 2.0 11.2 SEABORNE 12.5 5.9 12.5 0.0 5 50 10.0 46.9 SHARPSTOWN H S 0.3 3.1 4.2 3.2 64 2,079 3.1 17 .1 SHARPSTOWN MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.3 6 1 ,027 0.6 3.5 SMITH E 0 MIDDLE 1 386 0.3 1. 5 STERLING H S 1.a 1.5 1. 7 1.5 25 1 ,544 1.6 9.3 STEVENSON MIDDLE 3 1,012 0.3 1.a T H ROGERS SEC 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 271 0.0 0.0 TERRELL ALTER H S 1 40 2.5 14.1 TERRELL ALTER MIDDL 0.0 0.0 3.a 2.9 5 182 2.7 15.4 THOMAS MIDDLE o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 587 0.0 0.0 WALTRIP H S 1.6 2.7 4.1 4.3 49 1,616 3.0 16.9 WASHINGTON B T H S 2.a 0.9 0.0 o.a 14 t ,660 o.a 5.0 WELCH MIDDLE 2 t ,289 0.2 0.9 WESTBURY H S 0.6 2.1 4.3 2.7 59 2,702 2.2 12.4 WHEATLEY H S 1 1,260 0.1 0.5 WOODSON MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 551 0.0 0.0 WORTHING H S a.3 2.1 3.3 3.4 42 1 ,863 2.3 12.8 Y E S 50.0 35.8 44.4 15.4 al 222 36.5 93.4 YATES H S 13.3 3.9 3.5 2.2 96 2,490 3.9 21.0
NOTE: A DASH (-) INDICATES DATA ARE NOT REPORTED TO PROTECT STUDENT ANONYMITY.
72
APPENDIX B
1996-97 CAMPUS DETAIL BY DISTRICT
DROPOUT RATES BY ETHNICITY, ANNUAL DROPOUT RATE, AND ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
WHITE AFR. AM HISP ECON DIS 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 ESTIMATED DROPOUT DROPOUT DROPOUT DROPOUT TOTAL 7-12 DROPOUT LONGITUDINAL
COUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS RATE RATE RATE RATE DROPOUTS ENROLLMENT RATE DROPOUT RATE
HARRIS HUFFMAN ISO 2.1 0.0 1.9 2.6 25 1,203 2.1 11.8 HARGRAVE H S 3.4 0.0 3.4 4.9 25 750 3.3 18.4 HUFFMAN MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o 0 451 o.o 0.0
HUMBLE ISO 0.2 0.7 0.5 Q.2 34 11,022 0.3 i.a ATASCOCITA MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o 0 925 0.0 0.0 CREEKWOOD MIDDLE 1 605 0.2 1.0 HUMBLE DISCIPLINE p 0.0 o.o 0.0 o.o 0 220 0.0 0.0 HUMBLE H S 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.5 17 3, 160 0.5 3.2 HUMBLE MIDDLE 2 l ,041 0.2 1. 1 KINGWOOD H S o.o 0.0 0.0 o.o 0 3,610 0.0 0.0 KINGWOOD MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o 0 738 0.0 0.0 PAC E 6.2 14.8 9.1 o.o 14 17a 7.9 38.8 QUEST H S 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o 0 187 0.0 0.0 RIVERWOOD MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o 0 62a 0.0 0.0
KATY ISO 0.2 0.6 1.0 a.a 44 12,501 0.4 2.1 KATY H S 0.4 1.5 3.1 3.2 24 2,884 a.a 4.9 KATY J H 1 719 0.1 a.a KRAUSE CENTER o.o 0.0 0.0 o.o 0 40 0.0 0.0 MAYDE CREEK H S 0.3 0.5 0.7 o.o 10 2,382 0.4 2.5 MAYDE CREEK J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o 0 a12 o.o 0.0 MEMORIAL PARKWAY J 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o 0 749 0.0 0.0 OPPORT AWARENESS CTR 2 181 1.1 6.5 RODGER & ELLEN BECK o.o o.o 0.0 o.o 0 819 0.0 0.0 T H MCDONALD J H o.o o.o 0.0 o.o 0 960 0.0 0.0 TAYLOR H S 0.2 1.4 0.7 o.o 7 2,608 0.3 1.6 WEST MEMORIAL J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o 0 571 0.0 0.0
KLEIN ISO 1.0 1.3 1.7 1.3 164 15,049 1. 1 6.4 DOERRE INT 0.0 o.o o.o o.o 0 a12 0.0 0.0 HILDEBRANDT INT 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o 0 950 0.0 0.0 KLEB INT 1 877 0.1 0.7 KLEIN FOREST H s 1.5 1.5 2.8 2.2 55 3,132 1.a 10.1 KLEIN H S 1.6 3.1 2.1 3.6 60 3,590 1. 7 9.6 KLEIN INT 2 815 0.2 1.5 KLEIN OAK H S 1.4 2.9 2.4 0.7 46 3,018 1.5 a.a STRACK INT o.o o.o o.o o.o 0 936 0.0 o.o WUNDERLICH INT 0.0 0.0 o.o o.o 0 934 0.0 0.0
LA PORTE ISO 1.7 1.6 1.3 0.9 59 3,577 1.6 9.5 DEWALT ALTER 2 173 1.2 6.7 LA PORTE H S 2.6 2.4 2.1 1. 7 57 2,237 2.5 14.4 LA PORTE J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o 0 645 0.0 0.0 LOMAX J H 0.0 0.0 o.o o.o 0 652 0.0 0.0
NORTH FOREST IS 0.0 0.2 0.3 o.o 13 6, 108 0.2 1.3 EL EC 0.0 o.o 0.0 o.o 0 315 0.0 0.0 EAST HOUSTON El 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o 0 6 0.0 0.0 ELMORE MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o 0 420 0.0 0.0 FOREST BROOK H S o.o 0.6 1.6 o.o 11 1,861 0.6 3.5 KIRBY MIDDLE o.o o.o 0.0 o.o 0 742 o.o o.o NORTHWOOD MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o 0 4a4 0.0 0.0 OAK VILLAGE MIDDLE o.o 0.0 0.0 o.o 0 498 o.o 0.0 SMILEY H S 2 1,846 0.1 0.7
PASADENA ISD 1.5 1.5 2.6 1.9 356 17 ,868 2.0 11.4 BEVERLY HILLS INT 2 704 0.3 1.7 BONDY INT 0.0 0.0 o.o 0.0 0 671 0.0 o.o CHALLENGER INT DOBIE H S 0.3 a.a 0.6 1.3 14 2,488 0.6 3.3 HIGH POINT H S 3.9 0.0 4.0 3.0 6 163 3.7 20.1 HIGH POINT INT HOMEBOUND o.o 0.0 0.0 o.o 0 127 0.0 0.0 JACKSON INT 0.0 0.0 2.6 2.0 14 669 2.1 11.9 MILLER INT 1. 7 0.0 1. 7 1.4 11 700 1.6 9.1 PARK VIEW INT 1.8 5.9 2.4 a.a 16 759 2.1 12.0 PASADENA H S 2.0 o.o 3.1 2.5 75 2,783 2.7 15.1 QUEENS INT 0.0 0.0 1.4 0.5 6 605 1.0 5.a RAYBURN H S 1.9 0.0 3.1 2.7 69 2,983 2.3 13.1 SAN JACINTO INT 0.0 0.0 1.a 1.3 a 693 1.2 6.7 SOUTH HOUSTON H S 1.5 1.7 2.0 1.8 4a 2, 767 1. 7 10.0 SOUTH HOUSTON INT 0.0 1.4 0.7 Q.7 5 763 0.7 3.9 SOUTHMORE INT 0.0 0.0 1.6 1.3 a 732 1.1 6.4 TEGELER H S 17 .3 30.0 22.1 12.0 70 345 20.3 74.4 THOMPSON INT 0.0 o.o 0.0 o.o 0 742 0.0 0.0
NOTE: A DASH (-) INDICATES DATA ARE NOT REPORTED TO PROTECT STUDENT ANONYMITY.
73
APPENDIX B 1996-97 CAMPUS DETAIL BY DISTRICT
DROPOUT RATES BY ETHNICITY, ANNUAL DROPOUT RATE, AND ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
COUNTY
HARRIS
HARRISON
HARTLEY
DISTRICT
RAUL YZAGUIRRE
SHELDON ISO
SPRING BRANCH I
SPRING ISO
TOMBALL ISO
WEST HOUSTON CH
ELYSIAN FIELDS
HALLSVILLE ISO
HARLETON ISO
KARNACK ISO
MARSHALL ISO
WASKOM ISO
CHANNING ISO
HARTLEY ISO
WHITE AFR. AM HISP ECON DIS 1996-97 1996·97 1996-97 ESTIMATED DROPOUT DROPOUT DROPOUT DROPOUT TOTAL 7-12 DROPOUT LONGITUDINAL
CAMPUS RATE RATE RATE RATE DROPOUTS ENROLLMENT RATE DROPOUT RATE
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 122 0.0 o.o SCHOOL FOR SUCCESS o.o 0.0 o.o 0.0 0 122 0.0 0.0
1. 7 0.4 1. 5 .0 23 1 ,818 1 .3 7.4 C E KING H S 2.6 0.6 1.2 .0 19 1J125 1 .7 9.7 C E KING MIDDLE 4 691 0 6 3.4 HIGH POINT ALTEA 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 25 0 0 o.o
0 5 1. 7 1. 6 1.0 133 13,615 1.0 5. 7 LANDRUM MIDDLE 2 686 0.3 1 .7 MEMORIAL H S 4 1 ,901 0.2 1 .3
MEMORIAL MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 761 0.0 0 0 NORTHBROOK H S 1.2 1. 0 1.3 0.7 25 2,214 1. 1 6 6 NORTHBROOK MIDDLE 4 584 0.7 4 0 SPRING BRANCH ED CTR 4 659 0.6 3 6 SPRING BRANCH MIDDLE 3 .792 0.4 2 3 SPRING FOREST MIDDL 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 776 0.0 0 0 SPRING OAKS MIDDLE 2 786 0.3 1.5 SPRING WOODS H S 0.4 2.8 2.9 2.2 43 2,290 1 .9 10.8 SPRING WOODS MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 675 0.0 o.o STRATFORD H S 0.4 1.9 1.3 0.0 11 2,053 0.5 3.2
0.7 1.2 2 3 1.5 110 9,921 1.1 6.5 BAMMEL MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 1,083 0.0 o.o DUEITT MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 736 0.0 o.o EDWIN MWELLS MIDDL 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 923 0.0 o.o L' AMOR VILLAGE 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 31 0.0 0.0 SP ED CONTRACT 1 163 0.5 3.2 SPRING H S 1.2 2.6 2.0 2.1 40 2,862 1. 4 6.1 TWIN CREEKS MIDDLE 3 608 0.4 2.2 WESTFIELD H s 0.6 1. 6 4.3 3. 2 63 3,384 1. 9 10.7 WUNSCHE SCH 3 376 0.8 4.7
1.2 6.1 3.9 1.7 47 3,045 1. 5 6.9 BECKENDORF INT CHERRY STREET SCH TOMBALL H S 1.6 7.5 6.2 3.3 43 1 ,986 2.2 12.3 TOMBALL J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 1 ,042 0.0 o.o
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 147 0.0 0.0 WEST HOUSTON CHAR TE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 147 0.0 0.0
1.3 7.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o 0 491 0.0 o.o
ELYSIAN FIELDS H S 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 316 0.0 0.0 ELYSIAN FIELDS MIDD 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 173 0.0 0.0
1.5 1.7 0.0 1.2 26 1, 780 1.5 8.5 HALLSVILLE H s 2.2 2.7 0.0 2.3 26 1>176 2.2 12.6 HALLSVILLE J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 604 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 293 0.0 0.0 HARLETON H s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 163 0.0 0.0 HARLETON J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 110 0.0 0.0
6.6 3.9 0.0 4.9 12 245 4.9 26.0 KARNACK H S 6.6 3.9 0.0 4.9 12 245 4.9 26.0
0.9 1.4 1.1 0.5 38 3,326 1.1 6. 7 MARSHALL ACHIEVEMEN 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 74 0.0 o.o MARSHALL H S 1.1 1.9 0.9 0.7 32 2, 192 1.5 8.5 MARSHALL J H 0.5 0.4 1.3 0.2 6 1J106 0.5 3.2
2.3 1. 1 0.0 0.0 6 412 1.9 11.1 EXCELL PROGRAM 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 16 0.0 o.o WASKOM H S 3.8 1.6 0.0 0.0 6 254 3.1 17.5 WASKOM MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 152 0.0 o.o
0.0 o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 55 0.0 o.o
CHANNING SCHOOL 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 55 0.0 o.o
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 110 0.0 0.0 HARTLEY SCHOOL 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 11a a.a o.o
NOTE: A DASH {-) INDICATES DATA ARE NOT REPORTED TO PROTECT STUDENT ANONYMITY.
74
APPENDIX B
1996-97 CAMPUS DETAIL BY DISTRICT
DROPOUT RATES BY ETHNICITY, ANNUAL DROPOUT RATE, AND ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
WHITE AFR. AM HISP ECON DIS 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 ESTIMATED DROPOUT DROPOUT DROPOUT DROPOUT TOTAL 7·12 DROPOUT LONGITUDINAL
COUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS RATE RATE RATE RATE DROPOUTS ENROLLMENT RATE DROPOUT RATE
HASKELL 0.2 1.0 HASKELL CISD o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 355 o.o 0.0
HASKELL H S o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 355 o.o o.o
PAINT CREEK ISO 76 1.3 7.6 PAINT CREEK SCHOOL 76 1.3 7.6
ROCHESTER ISO 0.0 0.0 o.o 0.0 0 91 0.0 0.0 ROCHESTER SCHOOL 0.0 0.0 o.o o.o 0 91 0.0 0.0
RULE ISO 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 95 0.0 0.0 RULE SCHOOL o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 95 0.0 0.0
HAYS 0.9 5.0 DRIPPING SPRING 0.7 o.o 2.9 1.8 11 1,296 0.8 5.0
DRIPPING SPRINGS H 1.1 o.o 4.7 3.7 11 786 1.4 8.1 DRIPPING SPRINGS MI 0.0 o.o 0.0 0.0 0 512 0.0 o.o
HAYS CONS ISO 0.2 o.o 1.7 1.3 23 2,954 0.8 4.6 ALTER IMPACT CTR HAYS-BLANCO CO-OP 0.0 o.o 0.0 0.0 0 135 o.o 0.0 JACK C HAYS H S 0.4 0.0 2.6 2.1 21 1,812 1.2 6.8 KYLE EL R C BARTON J H 1,001 0.1 0.6
SAN MARCOS CONS 0.5 1.2 1.5 1.3 37 3,305 1.1 6.5 GOODNIGHT J H 1 558 0.2 1.1 JUVENILE DETENTION 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o 0 246 0.0 0.0 MILLER J H 1 554 0.2 1.1 PRIDE CTR 2 141 1.4 8.2 SAN MARCOS H s 0.9 3.5 2.2 2.5 33 1,B79 1.8 10.1
WIMBERLEY ISO 0.0 o.o 0.0 0.0 0 808 o.o o.o BOWEN INT WIMBERLEY H S 0.0 o.o 0.0 0.0 0 507 o.o 0.0 WIMBERLEY J H
HEMPHILL 1.0 5.7
CANADIAN ISO 4 415 1.0 5.7 CANADIAN ALTER SCH 3 15 20.0 73.8 CANADIAN H S 1 276 0.4 2.2 CANADIAN MIDDLE o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 128 0.0 0.0 ESMOR JUVENILE FACI 0.0 o.o 0.0 0.0 0 335 0.0 o.o
HENDERSON 2.0 11. 7 ATHENS ISO 2.4 3.4 3.6 2.3 47 1,734 2.7 15.2
ALPHA 12.2 12.5 0.0 0.0 6 56 10.7 49.3 ATHENS H S 3.0 4.1 5.3 4.0 37 1,067 3.5 19.1 ATHENS MIDDLE 4 636 0.6 3.7
BROWNSBORO ISO 1.9 3.6 0.0 2.1 24 1,202 2.0 11.4 ALPHA CAMPUS 20.7 o.o 0.0 20.0 6 31 19.4 72.5 BROWNSBORO H S 2.1 5.5 o.o 2.7 17 738 2.3 13.1 BROWNSBORO INT 1 15 6.7 33.9 BROWNSBORO J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o 0 439 0.0 0.0
CROSS ROADS ISO 2 317 0.6 3.7 A L P H A CAMPUS CROSS ROADS H S 2 195 1.0 6.0 CROSS ROADS J H
EUSTACE ISO 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.4 6 726 o.a 4.9 EUSTACE H S 1.3 o.o 0.0 0.7 6 468 1.3 7.5 EUSTACE MIDDLE o.o o.o 0.0 0.0 0 258 o.o o.o
LA POYNOR ISO 2 232 0.9 5.1 LA POYNOR H S 2 232 0.9 5.1
MALAKOFF I SD 3.8 0.0 8.7 0.5 19 573 3.3 18.3 MALAKOFF H S 6.1 0.0 13.3 1.0 19 359 5.3 21 .B MALAKOFF MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 o.o o.o 0 214 0.0 0.0
NOTE: A DASH (-) INDICATES DATA ARE NOT REPORTED TO PROTECT STUDENT ANONYMITY.
75
APPENDIX B 1996-97 CAMPUS DETAIL BY DISTRICT
DROPOUT RATES BY ETHNICITY, ANNUAL DROPOUT RATE, AND ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
COUNTY
HENDERSON
HIDALGO
DISTRICT
MURCHISON ISO
TRINIDAD ISO
DONNA ISO
EDCOUCH-ELSA IS
EDINBURG CISD
HIDALGO ISO
LA JOYA ISO
LA VILLA ISO
MCALLEN ISO
MERCEDES ISO
MISSION CONS IS
MONTE AL TO ISO
WHITE AFR. AM HISP ECON DIS 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 ESTIMATED DROPOUT DROPOUT DROPOUT DROPOUT TOTAL 7-12 DROPOUT LONGITUDINAL
CAMPUS RATE RATE RATE RATE DROPOUTS ENROLLMENT RATE DROPOUT RATE
0.0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 25 0 0 0 0
MURCHISON EL 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 25 0 0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 142 0.0 0 0
ALPHACAMPUS TR IN !DAD SCHOOL
2 0 11 .2
0.0 25 0 0.4 0.2 19 4,354 0.4 2.6
A P SOLIS MIDDLE 1 959 0.1 0.6
DONNA H S 0.0 5D.D 0.5 0.1 14 2,575 0.5 3.2
DONNA H S ACADEMY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 167 0.0 0.0
W A TODD MIDDLE 4 758 0.5 3.1
0.0 0.0 1.0 0.7 23 2,287 1.0 5 9
EDCOUCH-ELSA H s 0.0 0.0 1.5 1 .0 23 1,586 1 .5 8.4
EDCOUCH-ELSA J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 702 0 0 o.o
0 7 0.0 1.3 .2 111 8,893 1.2 7 3
BREWSTER EL 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 56 0.0 0 0
CO-OP PROGRAM 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 192 0.0 0 0
EDINBURG H S 0.0 0.0 1. 7 1 .9 45 2,733 1.6 9. 5
EDINBURG NORTH H S 1,9 0.0 2.1 1,8 59 2,816 2.1 11 .9
EDINBURG SOUTH J H 0.0 0.0 0 4 0.3 5 1,475 0.3 2.0
JUVENILE DETENTION 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 223 0.0 0.0
LINCOLN ED CTR 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 381 0.0 0.0
MEMORIAL J H 2 1,561 0.1 0.8
0.0 0 0 0.8 0.7 10 1,223 0. B 4 8 DIAZ J H 0.0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 408 0.0 0 0 HIDALGO H s 0.0 0 0 1.2 1.0 10 820 1.2 7 .1
2.0 0 0 2.8 2.2 172 6,218 2. 8 15 5 ALTER CTR FOR ED 0.0 0 0 10.2 10.9 34 339 10.0 47 0 CESAR CHAVEZ MIDDLE 0.0 0 0 1.8 1. 6 13 734 1. B 10 2
LA JOYA H S 0.0 0.0 1.9 1.6 52 2' 723 1. 9 10 9
LA JOYA 9TH GRADE 0.0 0.0 3.0 2 .1 33 1, 119 2.9 16 4 MEMORIAL MIDDLE 33.3 0.0 3.8 3.2 31 799 3.9 21 .1 NELLIE SCHUNIOR MID 0.0 0.0 1.3 1 .3 9 707 1.3 7.4
0.0 0.0 3.3 3 2 12 364 3.3 18 2 LA VILLA H S 0.0 0.0 3.1 2 6 8 254 3.1 17 5 LA VILLA MIDDLE 4 110 3.6 19 9
1.0 4. 7 2.8 2.3 276 10,729 2 6 14.5 BOWIE SCH 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 16 0 0 o.o BROWN MIDDLE 1 620 0 2 1.0
DE LEON MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 594 0 0 0.0
INSTR/GUID CTI! LAMAR MIDDLE
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 2
289 588
0.0 0.3
0.0 2.0
LINCOLN MIDDLE 1 5'8 0.2 1.0
MCALLEN H S 0.3 0.0 3.5 3.2 60 1,992 3.0 16.8 MCALLEN LEARNING CT 13.2 0.0 18.2 14.6 BO 452 17.7 68.9 MCALLEN MEMORIAL H 0.3 12.5 1 .2 1.1 25 2,353 1. 1 6.2
MORRIS MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 692 0.0 o.o OPTIONS IN ED H S 6.0 100.0 8.4 B.O 25 300 8.3 40. 7 ROWE H S 1.8 0.0 3 5 3.9 82 2,459 3.3 18.4 TRAVIS MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 533 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 2.4 1.5 55 2,323 2.4 13.4 MERCEDES H S 0.0 0.0 1. 7 1.2 24 1,398 1. 7 9.9
MERCEDES J H 1 835 0.1 0 .7
STUDENT ALTER PROG 0.0 0.0 15.2 10. 7 30 199 15.1 62.5
MISSION H S 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
2.2 3.9
1 .9 3.4
114 95
5,428 2,548
2.1 3.7
12.0 20.4
MISSION J H 4 995 0.4 2 4 MISSION NINTH GRADE 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.8 11 964 1.1 6 7 WHITE J H 4 949 0.4 2 5
0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 95 0.0 0 0 MONTE ALTO MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 95 0.0 0 0
NOTE: A DASH (-) INDICATES DATA ARE NOT REPORTED TO PROTECT STUDENT ANONYMITY.
76
APPENDIX 8
1996-97 CAMPUS DETAIL BY DISTRICT
DROPOUT RATES BY ETHNICITY, ANNUAL DROPOUT RATE, AND ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
COUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS
WHITE DROPOUT
RATE
AFR. AM DROPOUT
RATE
HISP DROPOUT
RATE
ECON DIS DROPOUT
RATE
1996-97 TOTAL
DROPOUTS
1996-97 7·12
ENROLLMENT
1996-97 DROPOUT
RATE
ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
HIDALGO ONE-STOP MULITS LULAC INFO, RESOURC
0.0 o.o
0.0 o.o
0.0 o.o
0.0 0.0
0 0
308 308
0.0 o.o
o.o o.o
PHARR-SAN JUANALAMO MIDDLE AUSTIN J H LYNDON B JOHNSON J H MEMORIAL MIDDLE PSJA CENTRAL H S PSJA H S PSJA NORTH H S TEENAGE PARENT PROG
0.6
0.0 0.0 1. 7 0.0 o.o
0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o
2.7
0.0 12.9 2.8 3.4 4.1
2.0
0.0 9.8 2.1 2.8 3.1
247 2 3 3 0
51 88 93
6
9,323 653
1, 112 728 797 409
3,210 2,748
146
2.6 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.0
12.5 2.7 3.4 4.1
14.9 1.8 1.6 2.5 0.0
55.0 15.4 18. 7 22.3
PROGRESO ISO MULTI ALTER PROGRESO H S PROGRESO MIDDLE
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
2.1 10.0 1.9
1.6 7.0 1.9
18 6
10 2
881 60
516 325
2.0 10.0
1.9 0.6
11.7 46.9 11.1 3.6
SHARYLAND ISD SHARYLANO B L GRAY SHARYLAND H S
0.4 0.5 0.3
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.8 0.7 0.9
0.2 0.3 0.2
15 5
10
2, 156 760
1,400
0.7 0.7 0.7
4.1 3.9 4.2
VALLEY VIEW ISD VALLEY VIEW H S VALLEY VIEW J H
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.7 1.1 0.0
0.4 0.6 0.0
6 6 0
829 536 293
0.7 1.1 0.0
4.3 6.5 o.o
. ~
WESLACO ISO ARMANDO CUELLAR MID CENTRAL MIDDLE MARY HOGE ACAD SOUTH PALM GARDENS H WESLACO H S
3.0 0.0 0.0 2.9
5.1
0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o
0.0
1.6 0.7 0.7 2.1
2.0
1.3 0.4 0.5 2.3
1.5
94 7 8
23 4
52
5,759 981
1, 161 1'111
157 2,435
1.6 0.7 0.7 2.1 2.5 2.1
9.4 4.2 4.1
11.8 14.4 12.2
HILL ABBOTT ISO
ABBOTT SCHOOL
138 138
0.8 0.7 0.7
4.6 4.3 4.3
AQUILLA ISO AQUILLA SCHOOL
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
o.o 0.0
0 0
79 79
o.o 0.0
o.o o.o
BLUM ISO BLUM H S
3 3
152 152
2.0 2.0
11.3 11 .3
BYNUM ISD BYNUM SCHOOL
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
o.o 0.0
0 0
121 121
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
COVINGTON ISO COVINGTON SCHOOL
o.o 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0 0
174 174
0.0 0.0
o.o o.o
HILLSBORO ISO HILLSBORO H S HILLSBORO J H
1.4 2.2 0.0
2.1 3.5 0.0
2.5 4.4 0.0
2.5 4.5 0.0
14 14
0
786 470 316
1.8 3.0 o.o
10.2 16.6 o.o
HUBBARD ISO HUBBARD H S HUBBARD MIDDLE o.o o.o o.o 0.0
4 4 0
272 195
78
1.5 2.1 0.0
8.5 11. 7 0.0
ITASCA ISO ITASCA H S ITASCA J H
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
0 0 0
287 176 111
0.0 o.o 0.0
o.o o.o o.o
MALONE ISO MALONE EL
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0 0
17 17
0.0 0.0
o.o o.o
MOUNT CALM ISO MOUNT CALM EL
0.0 o.o
0.0 O.D
0.0 D.D
0.0 D.O
0 D
19 19
D.D 0.0
o.o o.o
PENELOPE ISD o.o 0.0 O.D D.D 0 86 0.0 o.o
NOTE: A DASH (-) INDICATES DATA ARE NOT REPORTED TO PROTECT STUDENT ANONYMITY.
77
APPENDIX B 1996-97 CAMPUS DETAIL BY DISTRICT
DROPOUT RATES BY ETHNICITY, ANNUAL DROPOUT RATE, AND ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
COUNTY
HILL
HOCKLEY
HOOD
HOPKINS
DISTRICT
PENELOPE ISO
WHITNEY ISO
ANTON ISO
LEVELLAND ISO
ROPES ISO
SMYER ISO
SUNDOWN ISO
WHITHARRAL ISO
GRANBURY ISO
LIPAN ISO
TOLAR ISO
COMO-PICKTON CI
CUMBY ISO
MILLER GROVE IS
NORTH HOPKINS
SALTILLO ISO
SULPHUR BLUFF
SULPHUR SPRINGS
CAMPUS
WHITE DROPOUT
RATE
AFR. AM DROPOUT
RATE
HISP DROPOUT
RATE
ECON DIS DROPOUT
RATE
1996-97 TOTAL
DROPOUTS
1996-97 7-12
ENROLLMENT
1996-97 DROPOUT
RATE
ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
PENELOPE SCHOOL 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 86 0.0 0 0
WHITNEY H S WHITNEY J H
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
0 0 0
718 435 283
0.0 0.0 0.0
0 0 0
0 0 0
ANTON H S 3.1 0.0 3.6 2.2 5 160
160
1.1 3.1 0.6
6 17
3
7 3 7
ALTEA SCH HOMEBOUND LEVELLAND H S LEVELLAND J H LEVELLAND MIDDLE
0.7
1.2
0.0
2.7
7.1
0.0
1. 7
3.2
0.0
1. 1
1.8
0.0
22
18 4 0
1, 743
781 649 312
1.3
2.3 0.6 0.0
7.3
13.1 3.6 0.0
ROPES SCHOOL SAS ALTER 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
1 1 0
233 149
85
0.4 0.7 0.0
2.6 4.0 0.0
SMYER H S 2 2
192 192
1.0 1.0
6.1 6.1
SUNDOWN SUNDOWN
H S J H
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
0 0 0
299 182 117
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
WHITHARRAL SCHOOL 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 0
121 121
0.8 0.0
4 0
9 0
BEHAVIOR TRANSITION GRANBURY H S GRANBURY MIDDLE MEADOWS MIDDLE S T A R S ACADEMY
1. 5
1. 9
0.0 9.9
0.0
0 0
0 0 0 0
2. 7
3.1
0.0 25.0
1.9
3.4
0.0 0.0
48 3
36 1 0 8
2,954 66
1,821 572 540
78
1.4 1.6 4.5 2.0 0.2 0.0
10.3
8 3 9 4
24 4 11 .3 1.0 0.0
47 .8
LIPAN H S 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0 0
167 167
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
TOLAR H S 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0 0
0 0
0.0 0.0
0 0
226 226
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
COMO-PICKTON SCHOOL 318 318
0.9 0.3 0.3
5.2 1.9 1.9
CUMBY H S 3 3
156 156
1.9 1.9
11 .0 11. 0
MILLER GROVE SCHOOL 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0 0
127 127
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
NORTH HOPKINS H S 2.1 2.1
25.0 25.0
0.0 0.0
3.0 3.0
5 5
202 202
2.5 2.5
14.0 14.0
SALTILLO SCHOOL 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0 0
113 113
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
SULPHUR BLUFF SCHOO 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0 0
126 126
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
SULPHUR SULPHUR
SPRINGS H S SPRINGS MID
0.8 1.3 0.0
0. 7 1.0 0.0
2.1 3.6 0.0
1.0 1.8 0.0
16 16
0
1 ,856 1J197
661
0.9 1.3 0.0
5.1 7.8 0.0
NOTE: A DASH (-) INDICATES DATA ARE NOT REPORTED TO PROTECT STUDENT ANONYMITY.
78
APPENDIX B 1996-97 CAMPUS DETAIL BY DISTRICT
DROPOUT RATES BY ETHNICITY, ANNUAL DROPOUT RATE, AND ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
COUNTY
HOUSTON
HOWARD
HUDSPETH
HUNT
DISTRICT
CROCKETT ISO
GRAPELAND ISO
KENNARD ISO
LATEXO ISO
LOVELADY ISO
BIG SPRING ISO
COAHOMA ISO
FORSAN ISO
DELL CITY ISO
FT HANCOCK ISO
SIERRA BLANCA I
BLAND ISO
BOLES ISO
CADDO MILLS ISO
CAMPBELL ISO
CELESTE ISO
COMMERCE ISO
CAMPUS
WHITE DROPOUT
RATE
AFR. AM DROPOUT
RATE
HISP DROPOUT
RATE
ECON OIS DROPOUT
RATE
1996-97 TOTAL
DROPOUTS
1996-97 7·12
ENROLLMENT
1996-97 DROPOUT
RATE
ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
CROCKETT ALTER ED C CROCKETT H S CROCKETT J H
1.3 o.o 2.1 o.o
1.7 0.0 2.9 0.0
3.8 o.o 8.6 o.o
1" 0.0 2.5 0.0
17 0
17 0
996 103 589 374
1.1 1. 7 o.o 2.9 o.o
6.3 9.8 0.0
16.1 0.0
GRAPELAND H s GRAPELAND J H
1.4 2.0 0.0
0.9 1.4 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
5 5 0
392 271 121
1.3 1.8 0.0
7.4 10.6 0.0
KENNARD H S 0.0 o.o
0.0 0.0
0.0 o.o
0.0 0.0
0 0
219 219
o.o o.o
0.0 0.0
LATEXO H S 0.0 o.o
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
o.o 0.0
0 0
217 217
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
LOVELADY EL LOVELADY H S
0.0 o.o 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
o.o o.o 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
0 0 0
273 93
180
o.o o.o 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
ALTER SCH BIG SPRING H S BIG SPRING SP ED GOLIAD MIDDLE RUNNELS J H
1.1 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.0 1.2
0.9 o.o 1.6 o.o 0.0 0.0
2.1 0.0 3.4 0.0 0.0 1.0
1.7 0.0 3.0 o.o 0.0 1.2
34 0
29 0 0 5
2, 155 50
1,281 40
414 387
1.3 1.6 0.0 2.3 0.0 o.o 1.3
7.7 9.1 0.0
12.8 0.0 0.0 7.5
COAHOMA H S COAHOMA J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2 2 0
484 306 178
0.4 0.7 0.0
2.5 3.9 0.0
FORSAN H S 3 3
335 335
0.9 0.9
5.3 5. 3
DELL CITY SCHOOL 0.0 0.0
o.o 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0 0
111 111
4.5 0.0 0.0
24., 0.0 0.0
BENITO MARTINEZ ALT FORT HANCOCK SCHOOL
0.0 o.o 0.0
o.o 0.0 0.0
7.7 0.0 8.0
8.6 0.0 8.7
16 0
16
234 7
228
6.8 o.o 7.0
34.6 0.0
35.4
SIERRA BLANCA SCHOOL 3 3
77 77
3.9 3.9
21.2 21.2
BLAND H s 0.0 o.o
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0 0
240 240
1.4 0.0 0.0
8.1 0.0 o.o
BOLES H S REGIONAL ALTEA 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
3 3 0
339 281
71
0.9 1.1 0.0
5.2 6.2 0.0
CADDO MILLS H S CADDO MILLS MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
3 3 0
413 253 160
0.7 1.2 0.0
4.3 6.9 0.0
CAMPBELL H S 0.0 0.0
o.o 0.0
0.0 0.0
o.o 0.0
0 0
174 174
0.0 0.0
0.0 o.o
CELESTE H s CELESTE J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
1 1 0
254 159
95
0.4 0.6 0.0
2 .3 3.7 o.o
COMMERCE H S COMMERCE MIDDLE
0.7 1.1 o.o
1 .2 1.9 0.0
0.0 o.o o.o
0.4 0.6 0.0
6 6 0
795 499 296
0.8 1.2 0.0
4.4 7.0 0.0
NOTE: A DASH (-) INDICATES DATA ARE NOT REPORTED TO PROTECT STUDENT ANONYMITY.
79
APPENDIX B 1996-97 CAMPUS DETAIL BY DISTRICT
DROPOUT RATES BY ETHNICITY, ANNUAL DROPOUT RATE, AND ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
COUNTY
HUNT
HUTCHINSON
IRION
JACK
JACKSON
JASPER
DISTRICT
GREENVILLE !SD
LONE OAK ISO
QUINLAN ISO
WOLFE CITY ISO
BORGER ISO
PLEMONS-STINNET
SANFORD ISO
IRION CO ISO
BRYSON ISO
JACKSBORO ISO
PERRIN-WHITT CO
EDNA ISO
GANADO ISO
INDUSTRIAL ISO
BROOKELAND !SD
BUNA ISO
CAMPUS
WHITE DROPOUT
RATE
AFR. AM DROPOUT
RATE
HISP DROPOUT
RATE
ECON DIS DROPOUT
RATE
1996-97 TOTAL
DROPOUTS
1996-97 7-12
ENROLLMENT
1996-97 DROPOUT
RATE
ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
GREENVILLE H S GREENVILLE MIDDLE HUNT CO J J A E P NEW HORIZONS ALTER
D. 7 1.D
O.D D.D
3.1 5.D
D.D D.D
4.D 7.2
D.D D.D
2.7 4.5
D.D D.D
44 40
4 0 0
2,687 1 ,534
9D9 134 225
1.6 2.6 D.4 D.D D.D
9.4 14. 7 2.6 0.0 D.0
LONE LONE
OAK OAK
H S J H
2.3 3.3 0.0
D.D D.D D.D
o.o 0.0 D.O
1.2 2.4 D.D
7 7 D
337 223 114
2.1 3.1 D.D
11. 8 17 .4
D.D
C B THOMPSON FORD H S
MIDDLE 2.1 O.D 3.4
D.D D.D 0.0
1.2 0.0 2.2
D 7 D D 1 .4
29 D
29
1,402 556 646
2.1 0.0 3. 4
11 .8 0.0
18.9
WOLFE CITY H s WOLFE CITY J H 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0
1 1 0
296 164 114
0.3 0.5 0.0
2.0 3.2 0.0
BORGER H S BORGER MIDDLE CHAMPS
1. 5 1. 6 0.0 12.2
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.7 4.4 0.0 0.0
2.3 5.3 0.0 0.0
26 23
0 5
1,671 1,047
564 53
1. 6 1.7 2.2 0.0 9.4
9.1 9.6
12.5 0.0
44.8
WEST TEXAS WEST TEXAS
H S MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
3 3 0
421 279 129
0.7 1.1 0.0
4.2 6.3 0.0
C H A M P S SANFORD-FRITCH H s SANFORD-FRITCH J H
1. 5
1.3 0.0
0.0
0.0 0.0
10.0
15.0 0.0
2.0
1.6 0.0
12 4 6 0
661 32
423 216
1. 6 12.5
1. 9 0.0
10 .4 55.1 10.8 0.0
IRION H S 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
o.o 0.0
0.0 0.0
0 0
162 162
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
BRYSON SCHOOL 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0 0
124 124
1. 0 0.0 0.0
5.9 0.0 0.0
AL TEA SCH JACKSBORO H S JOHN LOWRANCE MIDDL
1.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.4
0.0
0.6
0.0
6 3 3 0
556 19
342 198
1 .1 15 6
0 9 0 0
6.3 64.3 5.2 0.0
PERRIN H S 3 3
209 209
1. 4 1.4
6.3 6.3
EDNA AL TEA EDNA H S EDNA J H SAM HOUSTON PR!
0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0
0.0 0.0
0
0 0
609
472 309
0 4 0 0
0 0 0 0
2.1 0.0
0.0 0.0
GANADO H S 4 4
366 366
.1
.1 6.4 6.4
INDUSTRIAL H S INDUSTRIAL J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2 2 0
533 341 193
0 4 0 6 0 0
2 2 3 5 0 0
BROOKELAND H S 163 163
0 6 0 6 0 6
3.5 3.6 3.6
BUNA H S 0.6 1. 1
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
1 .9 3 3
6 6
656 574
0.7 1. 0
4.1 6.1
NOTE: A DASH (-) INDICATES DATA ARE NOT REPORTED TD PROTECT STUDENT ANONYMITY.
80
APPENDIX B
1996-97 CAMPUS DETAIL BY DISTRICT
DROPOUT RATES BY ETHNICITY, ANNUAL DROPOUT RATE, AND ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
WHITE AFR. AM HISP ECON DIS 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 ESTIMATED DROPOUT DROPOUT DROPOUT DROPOUT TOTAL 7-12 DROPOUT LONGITUDINAL
COUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS RATE RATE RATE RATE DROPOUTS ENROLLMENT RATE DROPOUT RATE
JASPER BUNA ISO BUNA J H 0.0 o.o o.o o.o 0 284 0.0 0.0
EVADALE ISO 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 218 0.0 o.o EVADALE EL 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 63 o.o 0.0 EVADALE H S 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 155 0.0 0.0
JASPER ISO 0.3 0.6 2.3 0.5 9 1,685 0.5 3.2 JASPER H S 0.5 1.0 4.9 0.9 9 1 ,044 0.9 5.1 JASPER MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 641 0.0 0.0
KIRBYVILLE ISO 0.8 0.8 0.0 0.0 6 803 0.7 4.4 KIRBYVILLE H S 1.1 1.1 0.0 0.0 6 537 1.1 6.5 KIRBYVILLE J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 266 0.0 0.0
JEFF DAVIS 0.3 2.0 FT DAVIS ISO 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 274 0.0 o.o
FT DAVIS H S 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 154 0.0 0.0 HIGH FRONTIER H S 0.0 o.o 0.0 0.0 0 120 0.0 0.0
VALENTINE ISO 29 3.4 19.0 VALENTINE SCHOOL 29 3.4 19.0
JEFFERSON 1.3 7.6 BEAUMONT ISO 0.8 1.6 1.7 1.5 122 9,217 1.3 7.7
AUSTIN MIDDLE 4 581 0.7 4.1 CENTRAL SENIOR H S 2.7 1.9 3.5 2.0 41 1,970 2.1 11.9 CENTRAL 9TH GRADE 0.9 3.2 2.8 2.7 20 700 2.9 16.0 JEFFERSON CO YOUTH A 2 22 9.1 43.6 M L KING MIDDLE 0.0 1.5 2.0 1.4 5 349 1.4 8.3 MARSHALL MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 565 0.0 0.0 OAKS ED CTR 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 27 0.0 0.0 ODOM MIDDLE o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 587 0.0 0.0 PATHWAYS LEARNING C 7.9 2.5 0.0 1.8 13 445 2.9 16.3 SMITH MIDDLE o.o 1.7 0.0 1.6 6 387 1.6 9.0 SOUTH PARK MIDDLE o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 429 0.0 0.0 VINCENT MIDDLE o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 594 0.0 0.0 WEST BROOK SR H S 0.4 0.7 0.0 0.7 12 2,244 0.5 3.2 WEST BROOK 9TH GRAD 0.8 2.2 4.8 2.7 19 1,054 1.8 10.3
HAMSHIRE-FANNET 0.6 0.0 3.1 0.0 6 981 0.6 3.6 HAMSHIRE-FANNETT H 0.8 0.0 4.8 0.0 6 652 0.9 5.4 HAMSHIRE-FANNETT MI o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 329 0.0 0.0
NEDERLAND ISO 1.2 o.o 2.2 0.9 33 2,699 1.2 7 .1 CENTRAL MIDDLE 0.0 o.o 0.0 0.0 0 475 0.0 0.0 NEDERLAND H S 1.9 0.0 3.4 1.9 33 1,733 1.9 10.9 WILSON MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 493 0.0 o.o
PORT ARTHUR ISO 1.5 1.9 2.2 1.2 90 5,039 1.8 10.3 AUSTIN H S 1.4 1.1 o.o 1.2 8 651 1.2 7.2 DOWLING EL EDISON MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 o.o o.o 0 849 o.o 0.0 HUGHEN SCH JEFFERSON H S 2.2 4.3 3.7 2.0 59 1,810 3.3 18.0 LAMAR SCH 5.3 1.6 o.o 1.0 5 306 1.6 9.4 LINCOLN H S 0.0 1. 7 0.0 1.9 18 1,064 1. 7 9.7 WILSON MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 722 0.0 0.0
PORT NECHES-GAO 0.6 21 .4 1.5 0.6 19 2, 733 0.7 4.1 ALTER SCH 3 57 5.3 27. 7 GROVES MIDDLE 1 467 0.2 1.3 PORT NECHES MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 469 0.0 o.o PORT NECHES-GROVES 0.7 23.1 1.1 1.5 15 1'796 0.8 4.9
SABINE PASS ISO 0.0 o.o o.o o.o 0 87 0.0 0.0 SABINE PASS SCHOOL 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 87 0.0 0.0
JIM HOGG 2.3 13.2 JIM HOGG COUNTY 3.3 0.0 2.3 2.0 14 601 2.3 13 .2
HEBBRONVILLE H S 5.3 0.0 3.7 3.2 14 372 3.8 20.6 HEBBRONVILLE J H QUAD DISTRICT ALTER
NOTE: A DASH (-) INDICATES DATA ARE NOT REPORTED TO PROTECT STUDENT ANONYMITY.
81
APPENDIX B 1996-97 CAMPUS DETAIL BY DISTRICT
DROPOUT RATES BY ETHNICITY, ANNUAL DROPOUT RATE, ANO ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
COUNTY
JIM WELLS
JOHNSON
JONES
DISTRICT
ALICE ISO
BEN BOLT-PALITO
ORANGE GROVE IS
PREMONT ISO
ALVARADO ISO
BURLESON ISO
CLEBURNE ISO
GOOLEY ISO
GRANDVIEW ISO
JOSHUA ISO
KEENE ISO
RIO VISTA ISO
VENUS ISO
ANSON ISO
HAMLIN ISO
WHITE AFR. AM HISP ECON DIS 1996-97 1996-97 DROPOUT DROPOUT DROPOUT DROPOUT TOTAL 7-12
CAMPUS RATE RATE RATE RATE DROPOUTS ENROLLMENT
1.0 0.0 2.2 2.4 56 2,818 ADAMS J H 0.6 0.0 1.7 2.2 16 1 ,oao ALICE H S 1. 6 0.0 3.4 4. 2 38 1 ,254 DUBOSE MIDDLE 1 275 MEMORIAL MIDDLE 236
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 259 BEN BDL T MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 94 BEN BOLT-PAL BLANCO 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 166
706 ORANGE GROVE H S 429 ORANGE GROVE J H ORANGE GROVE PRI
0.0 0.0 3.0 1 ,3 12 478 PREMONT H S 0.0 0.0 4.8 2.2 12 302 PREMONT J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 176
0.9 1.7 0.0 0.3 11 1,373 ALVARADO H S 1.3 3.0 0.0 0.6 11 883 ALVARADO J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 491
1.5 0.0 1.4 1.4 43 2,853 BURLESON H S 2.4 0.0 2.1 2.8 43 1,828 BURLESON MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 1 ,031
0.5 0.0 0.9 0.6 15 2,667 CLEBURNE H S 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.5 5 1 ,638 CLEBURNE MIDDLE 2 972 GUINN LEARNING CTR 2 123 JOHNSON-SOMERVELL C WASHINGTON ED CTR
3 a 0 0
0.0 0.0
9.1 0.0
4 7 0.0
6 a
139 4a
1 .0 25.0 0.0 0 0 5 449 GODLEY H S 1.5 33.3 0.0 0.0 5 297 GODLEY MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 a 152
2 433 GRANDVIEW H S 2 28a GRANDVIEW J H 0.0 a.a 0.0 0.0 a 153
2.2 a.a a.8 1.4 39 1,864 ACCELERATED LRN CTR 4.4 a.a 10.0 6.9 7 146 JOSHUA H S 3.2 a.a a.a 1.9 32 1, 100 R C LOFLIN MIDDLE 0.0 a.a a.a 0.0 0 684
4 332 ALTER LEARNING CTR 2 32 KEENE H S 1 2a8 KEENE J H 1 111
o.a a.a a.a a a a 387 RIO VISTA H S a.o a.a a.a a a 0 252 RIO VISTA MIDDLE 0.0 a.a a.a a a a 135
1 566 ALTER IN COOR ED a.o a a 0.0 a a a 51 VENUS H S 1 343 VENUS MIDDLE 0.0 a a a.a a.a a 212
.6 a.o 0. 7 1. 1 5 399 ANSON H S 2 238 ANSON MIDDLE a a a.o a.a a.a a 156 HOBBS ALTER ED CO-OP 3 15
3 336
1996-97 DROPOUT
RATE
1.6 2.0 1.5 3.a a.4 a.4
a.o a.a a.a
0.1 0.2
2.5 4 a a a
1. 1 a.8 1.2 a a
1. 5 2 4 a a
a.6 a.3 a.2 1 .6 4.3 a.a
1.1 1. 7 a a
a.5 a.7 a.a
2.1 4.8 2.9 a.a
1.2 6.3 0.5 0.9
a a a a a a
a.2 a.a a.3 a a
.a
.3 a.8 a.a
20.0
a.9
ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
9.4 11 .4 8.6
16.9 2.2 2.5
0.0 0.0 a.a
a.9 1.4
14.2 21.6 o.a
6,6 4.7 7.3 a.a
8 7 13 3 a a
3.3 1.8 1.2 9.4
23.3 0.0
6.5 9 7 0 0
2 7 4.2 0.0
11 .9 25.5 16.2 a.a
7 a 32.1
, 9 5.3
a.a a.a a.a
1.1 a a 1. 7 0 0
6.a 7 .3 4. 9 a.o
73.8
5.2
NOTE: A DASH { - ) INDICATES DATA ARE NOT REPORTED TO PROTECT STUDENT ANONYMITY.
82
APPENDIX B 1996-97 CAMPUS DETAIL BY DISTRICT
DROPOUT RATES BY ETHNICITY, ANNUAL DROPOUT RATE, AND ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
COUNTY
JONES
DISTRICT
HAMLIN !SD
HAWLEY ISO
LUEDERS-AVOCA I
STAMFORD ISO
KARNES FALLS CITY ISO
KARNES CITY ISO
KENEDY ISO
KAUFMAN
RUNGE ISO
CRANDALL ISO
FORNEY ISO
KAUFMAN ISO
KEMP ISO
MABANK ISO
SCURRY-ROSSER I
TERRELL ISO
KENDALL BOERNE ISO
CAMPUS
WHITE DROPOUT
RATE
AFR. AM DROPOUT
RATE
HISP ORO POUT
RATE
ECON DIS DROPOUT
RATE
1996-97 TOTAL
DROPOUTS
1996-97 7-12
ENROLLMENT
1996-97 DROPOUT
RATE
ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
HAMLIN H S HAMLIN MIDDLE D.D D.D D.D D.D
3 D
222 114
1. 4 o~o
7.6 D.0
HAWLEY H S 3 3
395 395
0.6 0.6
4.5 4.5
LUEDERS-AVOCA EL LUEDERS-AVOCA H S
0.0 0.0 0.0
D.D O.D 0.0
0.0 0.0 D.O
D.0 o.o o.o
0 0 D
100 36 64
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
HOBBS ALTER ED GO-OP STAMFORD JR-SR H S
1.2
1.2
D.O
0.0
2.4
1.6
1.4
1.0
6 1 5
435 10
427
1.4 10.0 1.2
6.0 46.9 6.6
FALLS CITY H S 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
o.o o.o
0 0
171 171
2.4 0.0 0.0
13.3 0.0 D.D
KARNES CITY H S KARNES CITY J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o
2 2 0
526 324 202
0.4 0.6 0.0
2.3 3. 7 0.0
KARNES COUNTY ACAO KENEDY H S KENEDY J H
0.6 5.6
o.o
0.0 0.0
0.0
6.6 26.3
0.0
6.1 25.7
o.o
30 26
4 0
627 119 354 163
4.6 21. 8
1.1 0.0
25.5 77 .2 6.6 0.0
RUNGE H S 2 2
146 146
1.4 1.4
7.6 7.6
CRANDALL ALTER CTR CRANDALL H S L F RAYNES MIDDLE
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
o.o
o.o
4 0 4 0
761 37
476 294
0.4 0.5 0.0 0.6 0.0
2 .7 3.0 0.0 4.9 0.0
FORNEY H S FORNEY MIDDLE
0.5 0.6 0.0
3.6 5.4 0.0
1.9 3.0 0.0
3.0 3.6 o.o
6 6 0
1,053 673 360
0.6 1.2 0.0
4.5 6.9 0.0
ACCELERATED LRN CTR DAY TREATMENT CTR KAUFMAN H S NORMAN J H
0.0 0.0
o.o
0.0 0.0
o.o
0.0 0.0
0.0
o.o o.o
o.o
2 0 0 2 0
1 ,496 61
6 903 564
0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0
0.6 0.0 0.0 1.3 0.0
KEMP H S KEMP J H
1.6 2.6 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.5 0.9 o.o
15 15
0
672 564 309
1. 7 2.7 0.0
9.9 14.9 0.0
MABANK MABANK
H S MIDDLE 0.0 o.o 0.0 o.o
2 2 0
1,350 631 519
0.1 0.2 0.0
0.9 1.4 0.0
SCURRY-ROSSER H S SCURRY-ROSSER MIOOL 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o
3 3 0
369 259 130
0.6 1.2 o.o
4.5 6.6 0.0
OMBUDSMAN ALTEA TERRELL ADOLESCENT TERRELL H S TERRELL MIDDLE
0.0 0.0
0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0
o.o o.o
o.o
1 0 0 1 0
1,959 122 152
1J122 666
0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0
0.3 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0
BOERNE H S BOERNE MIDDLE
0.2 0.4 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
1.5 2.7 0.0
1.0 1.6 o.o
9 9 0
2,038 1,300
736
0.5 0.4 0.7 0.0
3.1 2.6 4.1 0.0
NOTE: A DASH {-) INDICATES DATA ARE NOT REPORTED TO PROTECT STUDENT ANONYMITY.
83
APPENDIX B
1996-97 CAMPUS DETAIL BY DISTRICT
DROPOUT RATES BY ETHNICITY, ANNUAL DROPOUT RATE, AND ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
COUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS
WHITE DROPOUT
RATE
AFR. AM ORD POUT
RATE
HISP DROPOUT
RATE
ECON DIS DROPOUT
RATE
1996-97 TOTAL
DROPOUTS
1996-97 7-12
ENROLLMENT
1996-97 DROPOUT
RATE
ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
KENDALL COMFORT ISO COMFORT H S COMFORT MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
4 4 0
466 290 176
0.9 1.4 o.o
5.0 8.0 0.0
KENT JAYTON-GIRARD I
JAYTON H S
103 103
1.0 1.0 1.0
5 5 5
7 7 7
KERR CENTER POINT IS
CENTER CENTER CENTER
POINT ALTER POINT H S POINT MIDDLE
1 .2 0.0 3.3 1.1 6 1 4 1
368 25
227 142
1. 4 1 .6 4 0 1 .8 0 7
8 2 9.4
21. 7 10.1 4.2
INGRAM ISO INGRAM MIDDLE INGRAM-TOM MOORE H
0.8
1.3
0.0
0.0
3.1
4.1
2.5
4.2
9 1 8
766 283 483
1.2 0.4 1.7
6.9 2.1 9.5
KERRVILLE ISO MENTORING/ LEARNING PETERSON MIDDLE RECOR TIVY H S
0.8 o.o
0.0 1.4
2.2 0.0
0 0 5.4
2.7 0.0
0.0 4.3
1.3 0.0
o.o 2.4
34 0 2 0
32
2,381 151 820 111
1,343
1.4 o.o 0.2 0.0 2.4
8.3 0.0 1.5 0.0
13.5
KIMBLE JUNCTION ISO
JUNCTION H S JUNCTION MIDDLE
2.6 4.4
0 0 0 0
3.2 5.0
6.1 11 .4
12 11
1
429 241 188
2 8 2 8 4.6 0.5
15.7 15. 7 24.4
3.2
KING GUTHRIE CSD
GUTHRIE SCHOOL 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0
41 41
0.0 0.0 0.0
o.o 0.0 o.o
KINNEY BRACKETT ISO
BRACKETT ALTER BRACKETT H S BRACKETT MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
3 2 1 0
306 25
177 111
1.0 1. 0 8.0 0.6 0.0
5.7 5.7
39.4 3.3 o.o
KLEBERG KINGSVILLE ISO
HOMEBOUND . K E Y S ACADEMY
KING H S L A S E R EXPULSION/ MEMORIAL MIDDLE NIGHT SCHOOL
0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0
10.3
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0
0.9 0.0 0.0 0.6
11. 4
0.6 0 0 0.0 0.2
16.7
20 0 0 6 2 1
11
2,512 29
162 1 ,529
85 816 106
0.8 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.4 2.4 0.1
10.4
4.6 4. 7 o.o o.o 2.3
13.3 0. 7
48.2
RICARDO !SD RICARDO MIDDLE
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0 0 0 0
0.0 0.0
0 0
152 152
0.0 0.0
o.o o.o
RIVIERA !SD DE LA PAZ MIDDLE KAUFER H S
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
.9 0.0 2.8
1. 4 0.0 2.0
5 0 5
405 116 289
1.2 0.0 1. 7
7 .2 o.o 9.9
SANTA GERTRUDIS ACADEMY H S SANTA GERTRUDIS EL
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0
167 140 27
0.0 0.0 0.0
0 0 0 0 o.o
KNOX BENJAMIN ISO
BENJAMIN SCHOOL 41 41
2 8 2.4 2.4
15.6 13.8 13.8
GOREE ISO GOREE SCHOOL
36 36
2 8 2.8
15.6 15 .6
KNOX CITY-O'BRI KNOX CITY H S 0' BRIEN MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
4 4 0
207 123
84
1.9 3.3 0.0
11.1 18.0 0.0
NOTE: A DASH (-) INDICATES DATA ARE NOT REPORTED TO PROTECT STUDENT ANONYMITY.
84
APPENDIX B
1996-97 CAMPUS DETAIL BY DISTRICT
DROPOUT RATES BY ETHNICITY, ANNUAL DROPOUT RATE, AND ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
WHITE AFR. AM HISP ECON DIS 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 ESTIMATED DROPOUT DROPOUT DROPOUT DROPOUT TOTAL 7·12 DROPOUT LONGITUDINAL
COUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS RATE RATE RATE RATE DROPOUTS ENROLLMENT RATE DROPOUT RATE
KNOX MUNDAY ISO 2.8 11.1 3.2 2.6 7 187 3.7 20.5 MUNDAY H S 2.8 11. 1 3.2 2.6 7 187 3.7 20.5
LA SALLE 2.6 14.8 COTULLA ISO 0.0 0.0 3.1 3.1 16 606 2.6 14.8
COTULLA H S 0.0 0.0 4.4 4.5 15 396 3.8 20.7 FRANK NEWMAN MIDDLE 1 213 0.5 2.8 JUVENILE JUSTICE CT 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 182 0.0 0.0
LAMAR 0.8 4.6 CHISUM ISO 1 397 0.3 1. 5
CHISUM H S 1 261 0.4 2.3 CHISUM MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 136 0.0 0.0
NORTH LAMAR ISO 0.6 0.0 0.0 1.1 8 1 ,475 0.5 3.2 GENEVA BAILEY MIDDL 0.0 0.0 o.o 0.0 0 540 0.0 0.0 NORTH LAMAR H S 0.9 0.0 0.0 2.0 8 935 0.9 5.0
PARIS ISO 0.9 0.9 4.3 1.2 17 1 ,710 1.0 5.8 CROCKETT MIDDLE o.o o.o 0.0 0.0 0 311 0.0 0.0 GIVENS EL PARIS H S 1.4 1.4 7.1 2.2 17 1, 102 1.5 8.9 TRAVIS J H
PRAIRILANO ISO 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 5 523 1.0 5.6 BLOSSOM EL 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 91 0.0 0.0 DEPORT EL 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 80 0.0 o.o PRAIRILANO H S 1.5 0.0 0.0 1.2 5 352 1.4 8.2
ROXTON ISO 1 125 0.8 4.7 ROXTON H s 1 77 1.3 7.5 ROXTON J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 48 0.0 0.0
LAMB 2.0 11.3 AMHERST ISO 4 114 3.5 19.3
AMHERST SCHOOL o.o o.o o.o o.o 0 114 0.0 0.0
LITTLEFIELD ISO 0.7 1. 8 4.6 2.7 25 842 3.0 16.5 LITTLEFIELD H S 0.0 0.0 3.3 1.9 8 509 1.6 9.1 LITTLEFIELD INSTR C 14.3 14.3 18.5 19.4 17 94 18.1 69.8 LITTLEFIELD J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 291 0.0 0.0
OLTON ISO 4 416 1.0 5.6 OLTON H S 3 220 1. 4 7.9 OLTON J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 175 0.0 0.0 OPTIONS ALTER SCH 1 24 4.2 22.5
SPADE ISO 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 93 0.0 o.o SPADE SCHOOL 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 93 0.0 0.0
SPRINGLAKE-EART 1 247 0.4 2.4 SPRINGLAKE H S 1 159 0.6 3.7 SPRINGLAKE J H o.o o.o 0.0 o.o 0 89 0.0 0.0
SUDAN ISO 3 210 1.4 8.3 SUDAN EL 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 42 o.o 0.0 SUDAN H S 1 168 0.6 3.5
LAMPASAS 0.6 3.7 LAMPASAS ISO 0.5 0.0 1.2 1.1 10 1,659 0.6 3.6
LAMPASAS ALTER H S 4 78 5.1 27 .1 LAMPASAS H S 0.5 0.0 1.6 2.0 6 981 0.6 3.6 LAMPASAS MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 580 0.0 0.0 RESIDENTIAL TREAT C 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 40 0.0 0.0
LOMETA ISO 2 261 0.8 4.5 LOMETA SCHOOL 2 261 0.8 4.5
LAVACA 0.5 2.8
NOTE: A DASH (-} INDICATES DATA ARE NOT REPORTED TO PROTECT STUDENT ANONYMITY.
85
APPENDIX B 1996-97 CAMPUS DETAIL BY DISTRICT
DROPOUT RATES BY ETHNICITY, ANNUAL DROPOUT RATE, AND ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
COUNTY
LAVACA
LEE
LEON
LIBERTY
DISTRICT
EZZELL ISO
HALLETTSVILLE I
MOUL TON ISO
SHINER ISO
SWEET HOME ISO
VYSEHRAD ISO
DIME BOX ISO
GIDDINGS ISO
LEXINGTON ISO
BUFFALO ISO
CENTERVILLE ISO
LEON ISO
NORMANGEE ISO
OAKWOOD ISO
CLEVELAND ISO
DAYTON ISO
DEVERS ISO
CAMPUS
WHITE DROPOUT
RATE
AFR. AM DROPOUT
RATE
HlSP DROPOUT
RATE
ECON DIS DROPOUT
RATE
1996-97 TOTAL
DROPOUTS
1996·97 7· 12
ENROLLMENT
1996-97 DROPOUT
RATE
ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
EZZELL EL 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0.0 0.0
0 0
0 0
0 0
18 18
0.0 0.0
0 0
0 0
HALLETTSVILLE EL HALLETTSVILLE H S HALLETTSVILLE J H
0 0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
560
394
0
0
0
0
0.0
0 0
MOULTON H S 2 2
178 178
.1
.1 6 6 6 6
SHINER H S 3 3
265 265
.1
.1 6
. 6
SWEET HOME EL 0.0 0.0
0 0
0 0
0.0 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
17 17
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
VYSEHRAD EL 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0.0 0.0
0 0
0 0
0 0
15 15
0 0 a o
0 0
0 0
DIME BOX SCHOOL 100 100
0 8 .0 .0
5
5
0 9 9
GIDDINGS H S GIDDINGS MIDDLE KNOX LEARNING CTR
.0
0 0
0,0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0
9
0
6 2 0 4
954 635 310
42
0 0 0 9
6 3 0 5
3 7 1. 9 0.0
45. 2
LEXINGTON LEXINGTON
H S MIDDLE
1. 1 1. B 0.0
0 0 0
0 0 0
3.2 5.3 0.0
1. 7 3 2 0 0
6 6 0
487 291 196
.2 2 0 0
7 11 .B
0 0
BUFFALO H S ~UFFALO MIDDLE
1. 4 2. 2 0 0
4.2 7 .1 0.0
8.8 14.3 0 0
3 6 6 9 0 0
9 9 0
365 237 128
1.2 2 5 3 B 0 0
7 .1 13 9 20 7
0 0
CENTERVILLE JR-SR H 0 0
0 0
0.0 0.0
0 0
0 0
o.o o.o
0 0
359 359
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
LEON LEON
H S J H
1.6 2.5 0.0
0 0 0.0 0.0
7.7 14.3 0.0
3 .8 7 3 o.o
7 7
0
358 222 136
2. 0 3.2 0.0
11.2 17 5
0 0
NORMANGEE H S 2 2
258 258
0 B 0 8
4 4
6 6
OAKWOOD H S 0 0
0 0
0.0 0.0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
158 158
0 0 0.0
0 0
0 0
CLEVELAND H S CLEVELAND MIDDLE DOUGLASS SCH GULF COAST H S HARDIN/CHAMBERS CTR
1.3 2 1
0.0 0.0 0.0
1. 7 2. 3
0 0 0 0 0 0
4 .7 5 7
0 0 0 0 0 0
2.3 3 3
0 0 o.o o.o
26 22
4 0 0 0
1,363 828 514
16 20 81
. 3 1.9 2.7 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0
7 8 10 9 14 9
4 6 0 0 0 0 0 0
DAYTON H S GULF COAST H S HARDIN/CHAMBERS CTR WILSON J H
0.9 1. 1
0 0
0 0 0 0
0.0
0.8 1.3
0.0
.3 2.0
0 0
17 13
2
2 0
2,067 1 ,263
127 67
754
0 8 1 .0 1.6 3 0 0 0
4.8 6. 0 9.
16 6 0 0
DEVERS EL 0 0
0 0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
o.o o.o
0 0
40 40
0 0 0,0
0.0 0.0
NOTE: A DASH (-) INDICATES DATA ARE NOT REPORTED TO PROTECT STUDENT ANONYMITY.
86
APPENDIX B
1996-97 CAMPUS DETAIL BY DISTRICT
DROPOUT RATES BY ETHNICITY, ANNUAL DROPOUT RATE, AND ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
WHITE AFR. AM HISP ECON DIS 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 ESTIMATED DROPOUT DROPOUT DROPOUT DROPOUT TOTAL 7-12 DROPOUT LONGITUDINAL
COUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS RATE RATE RATE RATE DROPOUTS ENROLLMENT RATE DROPOUT RATE
LIBERTY HARDIN ISO 1.2 0.0 2.4 1.2 7 569 1.2 7.2 GULF COAST H S HARDIN H S 1.8 0.0 0.0 2.1 6 370 1. 6 9.3 HARDIN J H 0.0 o.o 0.0 0.0 0 197 0.0 o.o HARDIN/CHAMBERS CTR
HULL-DAISETTA I 1 396 0.3 1.5 HULL-DAISETTA H S 1 235 0.4 2.5 HULL-DAISETTA J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 161 0.0 o.o
LIBERTY ISO 1. 6 3.3 3.0 1.6 25 1,201 2.1 11.9
GULF COAST H S 26.B 15.8 40.0 27 .8 18 70 25.7 83.2
HARDIN/CHAMBERS CTR 3 29 10.3 48.1
LIBERTY H S 4 748 0.5 3.2 LIBERTY MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 410 0.0 o.o
TARKINGTON ISO 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.5 9 850 1.1 6.2 TARKINGTON H S 1. 7 0.0 0.0 1. 0 9 540 1. 7 9.6 TARKINGTON MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 310 0.0 o.o
LIMESTONE 0.8 4.5 COOLIDGE ISO 3.8 2.0 7.7 4.4 5 127 3.9 21.4
COOLIDGE H S 3.8 2.0 7.7 4.4 5 127 3.9 21.4
GROESBECK ISO 4 796 0.5 3.0 ALTER LEARNING CTR 3 46 6.5 33.3 GROESBECK H S 1 497 0.2 1.2 GROESBECK MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 279 0.0 o.o
MEXIA ISO 0.5 0.3 1. 5 0.4 6 1,060 0.6 3.4 DEVELOPMENTAL CTR 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 37 0.0 o.o MEXIA ALTER 3 47 6.4 32.7 MEXIA H S 3 678 0.4 2.6 MEXIA J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 349 0.0 o.o
LIPSCOMB 2.1 11.9
BOOKER ISO 2.5 0.0 4.2 4.1 6 194 3.1 17.2 BOOKER H S 3.8 0.0 4.8 5.6 5 122 4.1 22.2
BOOKER J H 1 72 1.4 8.1
FOLLETT !SO 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 125 0.0 o.o FOLLETT SCHOOL 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o 0 125 0.0 0.0
HIGGINS ISO 2 67 3.0 16.6 HIGGINS SCHOOL 2 67 3.0 16.6
LIVE OAK 1.2 7.0 GEORGE WEST ISO 3 683 0.4 2.6
GEORGE WEST H s 3 436 0.7 4.1 GEORGE WEST J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 247 0.0 0.0
THREE RIVERS IS 1.9 0.0 3.1 1.4 10 412 2.4 13. 7 ALTER CAMPUS 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 13 0.0 0.0 THREE RIVERS H S 3.1 0.0 4.7 2.6 10 261 3.8 20.9 THREE RIVERS MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o 0 144 0.0 o.o
LLANO 2.4 13.6
LLANO ISO 2.0 0.0 7.0 4.2 17 705 2.4 13.6 LLANO H s 3.2 0.0 12.9 8.6 17 443 3.8 20.9 LLANO J H 0.0 0.0 o.o 0.0 0 262 0.0 o.o
LUBBOCK 1.5 0.s FRENSHIP ISO 0.9 3.8 1.1 0.9 27 2,505 1.1 6.3
FRENSHIP H S 0.8 6.5 1. 3 1.8 17 1,45B 1.2 6.8 FRENSHIP INSTR CTR 8.9 0.0 4.3 0.0 10 143 7.0 35.3 FRENSHIP J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 961 0.0 o.o
IDALOU ISO 0.9 0.0 2.0 0.8 6 413 1.5 8.4 IDALOU ALTERNATIVE 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o 0 5 0.0 o.o IDALOU H S 1.3 0.0 3.1 1.1 6 283 2.1 12.1
NOTE: A DASH (-) INDICATES DATA ARE NOT REPORTED TO PROTECT STUDENT ANONYMITY.
87
APPENDIX B
1996-97 CAMPUS DETAIL SY DISTRICT
DROPOUT RATES BY ETHNICITY, ANNUAL DROPOUT RATE, AND ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
COUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS
WHITE DROPOUT
RATE
AFR. AM DROPOUT
RATE
HISP DROPOUT
RATE
ECON DIS DROPOUT
RATE
1996-97 TOTAL
DROPOUTS
1996-97 7-12
ENROLLMENT
1996-97 DROPOUT
RATE
ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
LUBBOCK IDALOU ISO IDALOU MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 131 0 0 0.0
LUBBOCK ISO ALDERSON J H ATKINS J H CAVAZOS J H CORONADO H S DUNBAR J H ESTACADO H S EVANS J H HOMEBOUND HUTCHINSON J H IRONS J H LUBBOCK H S MACKENZIE J H MATTHEWS LRN CTR MONTEREY H S NEW DIRECTIONS PROJECT INTERCEPT SLATON J H T A A P WILSON S J H
S
0.9 0.0 1 .3 0.0 1.2 0.0 4.0
0.0
0.0 1.1 0.0 1.8 1.6
0.0 0.2
2.0 2.3 0.0 2.0 1.4 1.3 3.9
0.0
0.0 2.5 0.0 0.0 2.2
0.0 2.5
2.7 1.9 2.5 1.0 2.5 1 .3 4.0
0 0
0.0 3.6 0.0 13.3 4.1
0.0 2.6
1. 4 0 6 1 .8 0 6 1 .0 0 7 1.9
0.0
0 0 3 .4 0.0 1.9 2.6
0.0 1 .8
244 11 11
8 26
8 39
4 0 3 0
48 0
26 42
2 0
14
14,476 535 657 952
1, 755 722 991 923 298
1 ,070 794
2,035 763 375
1J775 211 738 968 119 683
1 .7 2. 1 1. 7 0.8 1 .5 1.1 3.9 0.4 0.0 0.3 0.0 2. 4 0.0 6.9 2.4 0.9 0.0 1.4 0.8 0.1
9. 7 11 . 7 9.6 4.9 8 6 6.5
21.4 2. 6 0.0 1. 7 0.0
13.3 0.0
35.0 13.4 5.6 0.0 8.4 4.9 0.9
LUBBOCK-COOPER COOPER COOPER
H s J H
0.3 0.5 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
1 .3 2 3 0 0
0.8 1.5 0.0
5 5 0
885 568 317
0.6 0.9 0.0
3.3 5 .2 0.0
NEW DEAL ISO NEW DEAL NEW DEAL
H S MIDDLE
0.4 0.0
20.0 25.0
3 9 5.4
3.2 2.9
7 5 2
369 227 142
1.9 2.2 1.4
10.9 12.5 8.2
ROOSEVELT ISO ROOSEVELT H s ROOSEVELT J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2 2 0
754 446 309
0.3 0.4 0.0
1.6 2.7 0.0
SHALLOWATER ISO SHALLOWATER H S SHALLOWATER J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
1 1 0
566 348 218
0.2 0.3 0.0
1.1 1. 7 0.0
SLATON ISO INSTRUCTIONAL CTR SLATON H S SLATON J H
0.3 0.0 0.4 0.0
1.4 0.0 2.2 0.0
1 .0 0.0 1 .5 0.0
0.5 0.0 1 .0 0.0
6 0 6 0
821 42
542 263
0.7 0.0 1. 1 0.0
4.3 0.0 6.5 0.0
LYNN NEW HOME ISO
NEW HOME SCHOOL 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0 0
110 110
0.8 0.0 0.0
5.0 0.0 0.0
O'DONNELL ISO O'DONNELL H s O'DONNELL J H 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0
1 1 0
231 150
81
0 4 0.7 0.0
2.6 3.9 0.0
TAHOKA ISO TAHOKA H S TAHOKA MIDDLE
0.7 3.4 .5 1. 7 5 4 1
372 230 143
1.3 1. 7 0. 7
7 8 10 0 4.1
WILSON ISO WILSON SCHOOL
116 116
0.9 0.9
5.1 5.1
Ml\OISON MADISONVILLE CO
MADISONVILLE H S MADISONVILLE INT MADISONVILLE J H
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0 0
947 578
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
NORTH ZULCH ISO NORTH NORTH
ZULCH ZULCH
EL HS
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
0 0 0
162 52
110
0 0 0
0 0 0
0.0 0.0 0 0
MARION JEFFERSON ISO 3.5 1. 4 0.0 1.5 21 824
2.5 2.5
14 4 14.4
NOTE: A DASH (-) INDICATES DATA ARE NOT REPORTED TO PROTECT STUDENT ANONYMITY.
88
APPENDIX B
1996-97 CAMPUS DETAIL BY DISTRICT
DROPOUT RATES BY ETHNICITY, ANNUAL DROPOUT RATE, AND ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
WHITE AFR. AM HISP ECON DIS 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 ESTIMATED DROPOUT DROPOUT DROPOUT DROPOUT TOTAL 7-12 DROPOUT LONGITUDINAL
COUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS RATE RATE RATE RATE DROPOUTS ENROLLMENT RATE DROPOUT RATE
MARION JEFFERSON !SD JEFFERSON H S 5.3 2.2 D.D 2.5 21 539 3.9 21.2 JEFFERSON MIDDLE D.D D.D D.D D.D D 285 D.D D.D
MARTIN D.8 4.6 GRADY ISO D.O 0.0 o.o D.0 0 104 0.0 0.0
GRADY SCHOOL 0.0 0.D 0.0 O.D 0 104 0.0 0.0
STANTON ISO 4 410 1.0 5 .7 STANTON H S 4 262 1.5 8.8 STANTON MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o 0 148 0.0 0.0
MASON 0.6 3.5 MASON ISO 2 338 0.6 3.5
MASON H S 2 222 0.9 5.3 MASON J H SPECIAL CAMPUS
MATAGORDA 1.2 6.8 BAY CITY ISO 0.6 1.4 1.8 1.1 27 2,354 1.1 6.7
BAY CITY H S 1.0 2.3 2.8 1.9 27 1,524 1.8 10.2 BAY CITY J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o 0 377 0.0 0.0 MCALLISTER J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o 0 471 0.0 0.0
PALACIOS !SD 0.3 0.0 1.2 1.3 7 800 0.9 5.1 MATAGORDA CO ALTER PALACIOS H S 0.0 0.0 1.9 1.8 6 511 1.2 6.8 PALACIOS J H
TIOEHAVEN ISO 2.0 3.1 2.2 2.6 10 470 2.1 12.1 Tl DEHAVEN H S 2.9 6.3 3.6 4.9 10 308 3.2 1B.0 TIDEHAVEN INT o.o 0.0 0.0 o.o 0 162 0.0 0.0
VAN VLECK ISO 4 516 0.8 4.6 MATAGORDA CO ALTER 0 H HERMAN MIDDLE VAN VLECK H S 4 328 1.2 7.1
MAVERICK 3.3 1B.5 EAGLE PASS ISO 0.0 0.0 3.4 3.0 188 5,613 3.3 18.5
ALTER SCH 0.0 0.0 20.0 18.2 59 310 19.0 1t. a DE LUNA ED CTR 0.0 o.o 0.0 o.o 0 74 0.0 0.0 EAGLE PASS H S 0.0 0.0 3.1 3.1 75 2,452 3.1 17.0 EAGLE PASS J H 0.0 0.0 2.0 1.6 26 1,380 1.9 10.8 MEMORIAL J H 0.0 0.0 1.6 1.6 28 1,622 1.7 9.9
MCCULLOCH 1.8 10.3 BRADY ISO 1.5 0.0 3.0 2.3 13 649 2.0 11.4
BRADY H S 2.0 0.0 4.7 4.1 12 420 2.9 16.0 BRADY J H SOUTH WARD EL
LOHN ISO 2 73 2.7 15.4 LOHN SCHOOL 2 73 2 .7 15.4
ROCHELLE ISO o.o 0.0 0.0 o.o 0 123 0.0 0.0 ROCHELLE SCHOOL 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o 0 123 0.0 0.0
MCLENNAN 1. 1 6.3 AXTELL ISO 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o 0 542 0.0 0.0
AXTELL H S o.o 0.0 0.0 o.o 0 291 0.0 0.0 METHODIST HOME BOYS 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o 0 66 0.0 0.0 WACO CTR FOR YOUTH 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o 0 185 0.0 0.0
BOSQUEVILLE ISO 2.0 4.5 0.0 3.2 5 246 2.0 11. 6 BOSQUEVILLE SCHOOL 2.0 4.5 0.0 3.2 5 246 2.0 11. 6
BRUCEVILLE-EDDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o 0 432 0.0 0.0 AVALON CTR 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o 0 52 0.0 0.0 BRUCEVILLE-EDDY H S 0.0 o.o 0.0 o.o 0 247 0.0 0.0 BRUCEVILLE-EDDY MID 0.0 o.o 0.0 o.o 0 137 0.0 0.0
NOTE: A DASH {·) INDICATES DATA ARE NOT REPORTED TO PROTECT STUDENT ANONYMITY.
89
APPENDIX B 1996-97 CAMPUS DETAIL BY DISTRICT
DROPOUT RATES BY ETHNICITY, ANNUAL DROPOUT RATE, AND ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
COUNTY
MCLENNAN
DISTRICT
CHINA SPRING IS
CONNALLY ISD
CRAWFORD ISD
GHOLSON ISO
LA VEGA ISO
LORENA !SD
MART ISO
MCGREGOR ISO
MIDWAY ISO
MOODY ISD
RIESEL ISO
ROBINSON ISO
WACO ISD
WHITE AFR. AM HISP ECON DIS 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 ESTIMATED DROPOUT DROPOUT DROPOUT DROPOUT TOTAL 7-12 DROPOUT LONGITUDINAL
CAMPUS RATE RATE RATE RATE DROPOUTS ENROL!...MENT RATE DROPOUT RATE
1. 1 0. 0 0. 0 . 1 7 676 .0 6 .
CHINA SPRING H S 1. 6 0 .o 0.0 .9 7 454 . 5 8.9 CHINA SPRING MIDDLE 0. 0 0. 0 0.0 .0 a 222 0 0 a.a
1.4 .1 2.8 a 2 19 1 ,246 . 5 a a ALTERNATIVE CTR 19. 6 14.3 7. 1 5 9 13 77 16 9 67 a CONNALLY H S a 2 a 9 4 3 a. a 6 775 a a 4 6 CONNALLY MIDDLE a.a a.a a a a a a 422 a a a a
3 270 .1 6 5 CRAWFORD H S 3 270 .1 6 5
GHOLSON EL a a a a
a a a a
a.a a.a
a.a a.a
0 0
3a 3a
a a a a
0 a a a
1. 6 1. 6 1. 2 1.7 18 1,210 1. 5 8.6 CHALLENGE ACADEMY a a a a a a a a 0 41 a a a.a H P MILES MIDDLE a a a a a a a.a 0 507 a a a.a LA VEGA H S 2.8 2 6 2 3 3 .4 18 676 2 7 15.D OPTIOtJS a.a a a a 0 a.a 0 12 a a a a
3 677 a 4 2 LORENA H S 2 440 a.5 2. 7
LORENA MIDDLE a.a a.a a.a a.a 0 230 a.a a.a OPTIONS T S T C
a.a 0.0 0.0 a.a 0 361 a.a a.a MART H S a.a 0.0 0.0 a.a 0 237 a. a a.a MART MIDDLE a.a 0.0 0.0 a a 0 124 a.a a.a
1.1 0.0 3 0 1. a 9 612 1 .5 a 5 CHALLENGE ACADEMY a a 0.0 0.0 a.a 0 5 a.a a a ISBILL J H a 0 0.0 0.0 a.a 0 209 a.a a.a MCGREGOR H S 2 381 a.5 3.
MCGREGOR PREP H S 16.7 0.0 23.5 28. 6 7 38 18 4 1a
a a 0.0 0.0 a.a 0 2,780 a.a a a CHALLENGE ACADEMY a.a 0.0 0.0 a.a 0 27 a.a a.a MIDWAY H S a.a 0.0 0.0 a.a 0 1, 737 o.a a.a MIDWAY MIDDLE a.a 0.0 0.0 a.a 0 997 a.a a.a OPTIONS PROGRAM a.a 0.0 0.0 a.a 0 35 a.a a.a SOUTH BOSQUE EL TSTC-COMP BASED H S
2.5 4.9 5.1 2.2 12 375 3.2 17 7
MOODY H S 4 a 7. 1 10.0 3.8 12 231 5.2 27.4 MOODY MIDDLE a a 0.0 0.0 a.a 0 144 a.a a.a
3 319 a. 9 5 5 RIESEL SCHOOL 3 319 a.9 5 5
a.7 0.0 a.9 a.a 7 1 ,003 a 7 4. CHALLENGE ACADEMY ROBINSON H S 1. 1 0.0 1.5 a.a 7 647 .1 6.3 ROBINSON J H
a.5 1. 4 2.1 1. 3 96 6,904 1.4 8.1
ALTER SCH 1. 7 1. 4 1.9 a.a 6 374 1.6 9 3 CARVER ACAO a.a 0 0 0.0 0.0 a 511 a.a a a CHALLENGE ACADEMY a.a 0.0 0.0 0.0 a 433 a.a a.a DORIS MILLER MONTES a.a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 28 a.a a a G L WILEY MIDDLE 1 417 a.2 1. 4 LAKE AIR MIDDLE a.a 0.0 0.0 a 0 a 529 a.o a.a METHODIST HOME a.a 0.0 0 a 0.0 a 72 a.a a.a OPTIONS a.a 0.0 0.0 0.0 a 166 a.a a.o TENNYSON MIDDLE a.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 a 501 a.a a.a UNIVERSITY H S a.9 3.3 4.0 3.5 44 1 ,356 3.2 18.D UNIVERSITY MIDDLE 1 754 0.1 a.a WACO H S a.6 1.4 1.3 0.9 33 2,828 1.2 6.8
NOTE: A DASH (-) INDICATES DATA ARE NOT REPORTED TO PROTECT STUDENT ANONYMITY.
90
APPENDIX B
1996-97 CAMPUS DETAIL BY DISTRICT
DROPOUT RATES BY ETHNICITY, ANNUAL DROPOUT RATE, AND ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
WHITE AFR. AM HISP ECON DIS 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 ESTIMATED DROPOUT DROPOUT DROPOUT DROPOUT TOTAL 7-12 DROPOUT LONGITUDINAL
COUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS RATE RATE RATE RATE DROPOUTS ENROLLMENT RATE DROPOUT RATE
MCLENNAN WEST ISO 1.6 1.3 2.5 1.8 15 902 1. 7 9.6 BROOKHAVEN YOUTH RA o.o o.o o.o o.o 0 84 0.0 o.o TS TC 22.7 0.0 100.0 50.0 6 23 26.1 83. 7 WEST H S 1.4 3.0 2.9 2.9 9 561 1.6 9.3 WEST MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 o.o 0.0 0 238 0.0 0.0
MCMULLEN 1.0 5.7 MCMULLEN COUNTY 102 1.0 5.7
MCMULLEN CO SCHOOL 102 1.0 5.7
MEDINA 1.6 9.3 D'HANIS ISO 2 141 1.4 0.2
O'HANIS SCHOOL 2 141 1. 4 0.2
DEVINE ISO 0.8 0.0 3.1 2.8 17 931 1.8 10.5 DEVINE H S 1.2 0.0 4.2 4.4 15 599 2.5 14.1 DEVINE MIDDLE 2 331 0.6 3.6
HONDO ISO 0.0 33.3 3.4 2.8 20 949 2.1 12.0 DETENTION CTR 2.4 o.o 6. 7 6.0 9 182 4.9 26.2 HONDO H S o.o 33,3 3.8 2.1 14 592 2.4 13.4 MCDOWELL J H o.o o.o 2.8 3.6 6 353 1. 7 9.8 NURSING HOME 0.0 o.o o.o o.o 0 7 o.o o.o
MEDINA VALLEY I 0.7 0.0 2.0 1.4 16 1,325 1.2 7.0 ALTER LEARNING CTR 7.7 0.0 8.2 0.0 6 78 7.7 38.1 MEDINA VALLEY H S 0.6 o.o 1.8 2.2 9 814 1. 1 6.5 MEDINA VALLEY J H 1 493 0.2 1.2
NATALIA ISO 0.6 0.0 1.7 1. 7 7 526 1.3 7.7 NATALIA H s 1.0 0.0 2.8 3.1 7 322 2.2 12.4 NATALIA J H 0.0 0.0 o.o 0.0 0 204 0.0 o.o
MENARD 0.0 o.o MENARD ISO 0.0 0.0 o.o 0.0 0 250 0.0 o.o
c 8 p MENARD H S ~.o 0.0 o.o 0.0 0 144 0.0 o.o MENARD J H
MIDLAND 2.4 13.7 GREENWOOD ISO 1.4 0.0 6.6 3.8 18 804 2.2 12.7
GREENWOOD H S 1.4 0.0 6.6 3.8 18 804 2.2 12.7
MIDLAND ISO 1.7 3.3 3.5 3.0 270 11,116 2.4 13. 7 ALAMO J H 0.2 o.o 1.0 0.4 5 1,114 0.4 2.7 CARVER 0 0 L 0.0 o.o 0.0 o.o 0 6 0.0 o.o FANNIN EL 1 14 7.1 35.9 GEORGE T ABELL J H 4 1,104 0.4 2.2 GODDARD J H 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.8 5 1, 144 0.4 2.6 LEE FRESHMAN H S 1. 7 1.0 2.9 3.5 24 1,093 2.2 12.5 LEE H S 1.5 2.9 3.4 4.5 51 2,442 2.1 11.9 MIDLAND FRESHMAN H 1.4 3.9 4.4 3.4 30 1,047 2.9 16.0 MIDLAND H S 0.3 1.3 2.0 1.6 21 2,222 0.9 5.5 SAN JACINTO J H 0.5 1.3 1.4 0.9 9 931 1.0 5.7 VIOLA M COLEMAN H S 18.2 20.5 21.5 19.9 116 590 19.7 73. l
MILAM 0.6 3.5 BUCKHOLTS ISO o.o o.o o.o o.o 0 92 0.0 o.o
BUCKHOLTS SCHOOL 0.0 0.0 o.o 0.0 0 92 0.0 o.o
CAMERON ISO 0.5 1.2 0.0 1.0 6 857 0.7 4.1 CAMERON J H 1 309 0.3 1.9 YOE HS 0.7 1.8 0.7 1.3 5 548 0.9 5.4
MILANO ISO 244 0.4 2.4 MILANO H s 244 0.4 2.4
ROCKDALE ISO 0.8 0.0 0.9 0.7 7 933 0.6 4.4 HASHEM JUVENILE JUS 0.0 0.0 o.o 0.0 0 53 0.0 o.o ROCKDALE H S 1.3 0.0 1.6 1.3 7 598 1.2 6.8 ROCKDALE J H 0.0 0.0 o.o 0.0 0 339 0.0 o.o
NOTE: A DASH (-) INDICATES DATA ARE NOT REPORTED TO PROTECT STUDENT ANONYMITY.
91
APPENDIX B
1996-97 CAMPUS DETAIL BY DISTRICT
DROPOUT RATES BY ETHNICITY, ANNUAL DROPOUT RATE, AND ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
COUNTY
MILAM
MILLS
MITCHELL
MONTAGUE
MONTGOMERY
DISTRICT
THORNDALE ISO
GOLDTHWAITE ISO
MULLIN ISO
PRIDDY ISO
STAR ISO
COLORADO ISO
LORAINE ISO
WESTBROOK ISO
BOWIE ISO
FORESTBURG ISO
GOLD BURG ISO
MONTAGUE ISO
NOCONA ISO
PRAIRIE VALLEY
SAINT JO ISO
CONROE ISO
CAMPUS
THORNDALE H S
GOLDTHWAITE H S NEW HORIZONS RANCH
MULLIN SCHOOL
PRIDDY SCHOOL
STAR SCHOOL
COLORADO H S COLORADO MIDDLE HOBBS ALTER ED C0-0
LORAINE SCHOOL
WESTBROOK SCHOOL
BOWIE H S BOWIE J H
FORESTBURG SCHOOL
GOLD BURG H S
MONTAGUE EL
NOCONA H S NOCONA MIDDLE
PRAIRIE VALLEY H S
SAINT JO H S
BB RICE EL CDYORKJH CANEY CREEK H S CONROE H S G E 0 CAMPUS MCCULLOUGH J H MOREHEAD J H NEAL KNOX SEVENTH G OAK RIDGE H S PEET J H PROJECT RESTORE RESOURCE & DEVEL CTR THE WOODLANDS W L HAUKE ALTER ED
WHITE DROPOUT
RATE
0.0 0.0
1. 1 1.2 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.9 0.4 0.0 22.2
0.0 0.0
0.9 1.2
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
4.9 4.9
0.7
0.0 2.3 0.9 4.6
0.0 0.3
0.3 7.6
AFR. AM DROPOUT
RATE
0 0 0 0
0.0 0.0 0.0
0 0 0 0
o.o 0.0
0.0 0.0
2.8 4.2 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
2.0
0.0 0.0 1.5 12.5
0.0 2.1
5.2 7. 3
HISP DROPOUT
RATE
0 0 0 0
3.6 4.3 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 o.o
0.0 0.0
3.5 2.8 0.0 19.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0 0 0.0
1. 7
0.0 5.7 2.3 8.3
0.0 0.0
1. 6 11.1
ECON DIS DROPOUT
RATE
0 0 0 0
4,8 5.6 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.5 0.8 0.0 0.0
0 0 0.0
0.5 1. 1
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
2 4 2.4
1.5
0.0 4.8 1.5 0.0
0 0 0 0
2. 7 7.4
1996-97 TOTAL
DROPOUTS
0 0
5 5 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
12 6 0 6
2 2
0 0
7 6
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 0
0 0
9 9
119
0 21 34
5 1 4 0 7 1 1
12 29
1996-97 7-12
ENROLLMENT
251 251
342 290
52
103 103
45 45
86 86
617 399 206
31
88 88
118 118
833 554 279
94 94
88 88
20 20
435 289 147
72 72
197 197
13, 781
735 780
2,750 86
1,957 985
1 ,006 1>735 1,316
65
2,354 370
1996-97 ORO POUT
RATE
0.0 0.0
0.9 1.5 1. 7 0.0
0 0 0 0
0.0 0.0
o.o 0.0
1. 7 1.9 1. 5 0.0
19.4
2.3 2.3
0.0 0.0
0.9 0.8 1. 1 0.4
0.0 0.0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
4.6 4.6
0.9 0.9
0 0 2 7
.2 5.8 0.1 0.4 0.0 0.4 0.1 1 .5
0.5 7.8
ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
o.o o.o
5 3 8 5 9 9 0 0
o.o o.o
o.o o.o
0.0 o.o
10.Q 11.1 8.7 o.o
72.5
12.9 12.9
o.o o.o
5.5 4.9 6.3 2.1
o.o o.o
0.0 0.0
0.0 o.o
o.o o.o o.o
o.o o.o
24.5 24.5
5.5 5.1
0.0 15.1
7 .2 30.2 0.3 2.4 0.0 2.4 0.5 8.9
3 0 38.7
NOTE: A DASH(-) INDICATES DATA ARE NOT REPORTED TO PROTECT STUDENT ANONYMITY.
92
APPENDIX B
1996-97 CAMPUS DETAIL BY DISTRICT
DROPOUT RATES BY ETHNICITY, ANNUAL DROPOUT RATE, AND ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
WHITE AFR. AM HISP ECON DIS 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 ESTIMATED DROPOUT DROPOUT DROPOUT DROPOUT TOTAL 7-12 DROPOUT LONGITUDINAL
COUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS RATE RATE RATE RATE DROPOUTS ENROLLMENT RATE DROPOUT RATE
MONTGOMERY MAGNOLIA ISO 1.6 1.9 2.9 1.9 41 2,373 1. 7 9.9 BEAR BRANCH J H 2 434 0.5 2.7 MAGNOLIA H S 2.5 2.7 4.3 2.9 39 1,475 2.6 14.9 MAGNOLIA J H o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 468 0.0 o.o
MONTGOMERY ISO 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.4 5 1,451 0.3 2.1 MONTGOMERY H S 0.6 0.0 0.0 1.0 5 916 0.5 3.2 MONTGOMERY J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 535 o.o o.o
NEW CANEY ISO 0.6 0.0 1.8· 0.7 19 2,632 0.7 4.3 LEARNING CTR 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 92 0.0 0.0 NEW GANEY H S 0.9 o.o 2.7 1. 1 18 1,630 1.1 6.5 NEW GANEY MIDDLE 1 994 0.1 0.6
SPLENDORA ISO 2 1, 194 0.2 1.0 SPLENDORA H S 2 764 0.3 1.6 SPLENDORA MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 430 0.0 o.o
WILLIS ISD 1.2 3.9 1.9 2.7 30 2,012 1.5 8.6 LYNN LUCAS MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 754 0.0 o.o STUBBLEFIELD ALTER 5.1 27.3 20.0 12.9 11 125 8.8 42.5 WILLIS H S 1.4 3.8 0.8 3.5 19 , ,228 1.5 8.9
MOORE 2.0 , 1.6 DUMAS ISD 0.5 o.o 4.3 2.3 43 1,811 2.4 13.4
C H A M P S 26. 7 0.0 35.1 22.2 25 74 33.8 91.6 DUMAS H S 0.0 0.0 3.6 2.7 18 1,073 1. 7 9.7 DUMAS J H 0.0 0.0 o.o 0.0 0 696 o.o o.o
SUNRAY ISO o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 324 0.0 o.o CHAMPS 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o 0 16 0.0 o.o SUNRAY EL 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o 0 133 0.0 o.o SUNRAY H S 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o 0 184 0.0 o.o
MORRIS 0.8 4.4 DAINGERFIELD-LO 0.5 1. 7 2.8 1.2 9 935 1.0 5.6
DAINGERFIELD H s 0.7 2.5 3.6 2.1 9 632 1.4 8.3 DAINGERFIELD J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o 0 303 0.0 o.o
PEWITT ISD 2 538 0.4 2.2 PEWITT H s 2 349 0.6 3.4 PEWITT J H 0.0 0.0 o.o 0.0 0 189 o.o o.o
MOTLEY 2.7 15.2 MOTLEY COUNTY I 4 148 2.7 15.2
MOTLEY COUNTY SCHOOL 4 148 2.7 15.2
NACOGDOCHES 0.7 4.2 CENTRAL HEIGHTS 2 296 0.7 4.0
CENTRAL HEIGHTS H S 2 296 0.7 4.0
CHIRENO ISO 1 ~44 0.7 4.1 CHIRENO El 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 51 0.0 0.0 CHIRENO H S 93 1. 1 6.3
CUSHING ISO o.o 0.0 0.0 o.o 0 263 0.0 0.0 CUSHING SCHOOL o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 263 0.0 0.0
DOUGLASS ISD o.o 0.0 o.o 0.0 0 158 0.0 0.0 DOUGLASS SCHOOL 0.0 o.o 0.0 0.0 0 158 0.0 0.0
ETOILE ISO 0.0 o.o 0.0 0.0 0 36 0.0 0.0 ETOILE MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o 0 36 0.0 0.0
GARRISON ISD 4 321 1.2 7.3 GARRISON H S 4 321 1.2 7.3
MARTINSVILLE IS o.o 0.0 0.0 o.o 0 127 0.0 0.0
NOTE: A DASH (-) INDICATES DATA ARE NOT REPORTED TO PROTECT STUDENT ANONYMITY.
93
APPENDIX B 1996-97 CAMPUS DETAIL BY DISTRICT
DROPOUT RATES BY ETHNICITY, ANNUAL DROPOUT RATE, AND ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
COUNTY
NACOGDOCHES
NAVARRO
NEWTON
NOLAN
DISTRICT
MARTINSVILLE IS
NACOGDOCHES ISD
WODEN ISO
BLOOMING GROVE
CORSICANA ISO
DAWSON ISO
FROST ISO
KERENS ISO
MILDRED ISD
RICE ISO
BURKEVILLE ISO
DEWEYVILLE ISO
NEWTON ISO
BLACKWELL CONS
HIGHLAND ISO
ROSCOE ISO
SWEETWATER ISO
CAMPUS
WHITE DROPOUT
RATE
AFR. AM DROPOUT
RATE
HISP DROPOUT
RATE
ECON DIS DROPOUT
RATE
1996-97 TOTAL
DROPOUTS
1996-97 7-12
ENROLLMENT
1996-97 DROPOUT
RATE
ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
MARTINSVILLE SCHOOL 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 127 0.0 0.0
ACCELERATED LEARNIN NACOGDOCHES H S PINELAND HOSPITAL THOMAS J RUSK MIOOL
0.3 5.8 0.2 0.0 0.0
1.1 6.5 1 .5 0.0 0.0
1 .6 0.0 2.9 0.0 0.0
1.1 0.0 2.2 0.0 0.0
22 5
17 0 0
3,129 99
1,895 110
1,062
0.7 5.1 0.9 0.0 0.0
4.2 26. 7
5.3 0.0 0.0
NACOGDOCHES BOYS RA WODEN H S WODEN J H
1 .0 0 0 1 .5 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
10.0 0.0 16.7 0.0
1.5 0.0 2.9 0.0
5 0 5 0
407 21
272 114
1 .2 0.0 1 .8 0.0
., 2 0.0
10.S 0.0
BLOOMING GROVE H s BLOOMING GROVE J H
2 1 1
412 268 144
1.3 0.5 0.4 0.7
7.5 2.9 2.2 4.1
ALPHA LEARNING CTR COLLINS MIDDLE CORSICANA H S
0.9 5.0 0.0 0.8
2.5 0.0 0.0 4 .4
3.4 4.2 0.0 5.8
2.0 1. 3 0.0 4.0
40 7 0
33
2,336 204 884
1,343
1. 7 3.4 0.0 2.5
9.8 18.9 0.0
13.9
DAWSON H S 3 3
243 243
1.2 1.2
7.2 7.2
FROST H S 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0 0
179 179
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
KERENS SCHOOL 3 3
347 347
0.9 0.9
5.1 5.1
MILDRED H S 2 2
247 247
0.8 0.8
4.8 4.8
RICE EL 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
o.o 0.0
0.0 0.0
0 0
135 135
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
BURKEVILLE JR-SR HS 3 3
237 237
.1
.3
.3
6 3 7.4 7.4
DEWEYVILLE H S DEWEYVILLE MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
4 4 0
395 262 134
1 .0 1 .5 0 0
5.9 8.8 0.0
NEWTON NEWTON
H S MIDDLE
1.3 1. 1 0.0
0.7 1. 1 0.0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0. 5 0.9 o.o
8 5 0
758 475 279
1. 1 1. 1 0.0
6.2 6 .2 0.0
BLACKWELL SCHOOL 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
o.o o.o
0 0
116 116
2.2 0.0 0.0
12.4 0.0 0.0
HIGHLAND SCHOOL 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 o.o
0 0
94 94
o.o 0.0
0.0 0.0
ROSCOE H S 2 1
227 225
0.9 0.4
5. 2 2.6
HOBBS ALTER ED C0-0 RECOR JUVENILE DETE SWEETWATER H S SWEETWATER MIDDLE
1.8 21.7 0.0 0.8 0.0
3.2 16. 7 0.0 3.1 0.0
3.8 31 .9 0.0 1 .3 0.0
3.7 28.0 o.o 2.0 o.o
37 27
0 10
0
1 ,364 101 137 848 476
2.7 26.7 0.0 1 .2 0.0
15 2 84.5 0.0 6.9 0.0
NOTE: A DASH (-) INDICATES DATA ARE NOT REPORTED TO PROTECT STUDENT ANONYMITY.
94
APPENDIX B 1996-97 CAMPUS DETAIL BY DISTRICT
DROPOUT RATES BY ETHNICITY, ANNUAL DROPOUT RATE, AND ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
COUNTY DISTRICT
NUECES ACADEMY OF TRAN
AGUA DULCE ISO
BANQUETE ISO
BISHOP CONS ISO
CALALLEN ISO
CORPUS CHRISTI
DRISCOLL ISO
FLOUR BLUFF ISO
LONDON ISO
PORT ARANSAS IS
ROBSTOWN ISO
TULOSO-MIDWAY I
WEST OSO ISO
WHITE AFR. AM HISP ECON DIS 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 ESTIMATED DROPOUT DROPOUT DROPOUT DROPOUT TOTAL 7-12 DROPOUT LONGITUDINAL
CAMPUS RATE RATE RATE RATE DROPOUTS ENROLLMENT RATE DROPOUT RATE
2.4 13.4 9.4 7.7 19.9 20.4 111 596 18.6 71.0
ACADEMY OF TRANSIT! 9.4 7. 7 t9.9 20.4 111 596 18.6 71.0
195 0.5 3.0 AGUA DULCE H S 195 0.5 3.0
0.0 o.o 0.0 o.o 0 445 0.0 0.0 BANQUETE H S 0.0 o.o 0.0 o.o 0 292 0.0 0.0 BANQUETE J H 0.0 o.o 0.0 0.0 0 154 0.0 0.0
3 725 0.4 2.5 BISHOP H S 3 438 0.7 4.0 LILLION E LUEHRS J o.o o.o 0.0 0.0 0 288 0.0 o.o
0.8 o.o 1.2 0.9 22 2,531 0.9 5.1 CALALLEN H S 1.2 o.o 1.9 1. 7 22 1,639 1.3 7.8
CALALLEN MIDDLE 0.0 o.o 0.0 o.o 0 893 o.o 0.0
1.6 2.6 2.7 2.2 479 20,215 2.4 13.4 ALTER H S CTR 0.0 o.o 0.0 0.0 0 465 0.0 0.0 BAKER MIDDLE 4 612 0.7 3.9 BOKEN CAMP 22.7 12.5 0.0 0.0 7 64 10.9 50.1 BROWNE MIDDLE 1 657 0.2 0.9 CARROLL H S 0.2 0.5 0.4 0.0 10 3, 133 0.3 1.9 CULLEN MIDDLE 3 424 0.7 4.2 CUNNINGHAM MIDDLE 1 555 0.2 1.1 DRISCOLL MIDDLE 2.1 o.o 1.4 0.9 8 642 1.2 7.3 GRANT MIDDLE 1 740 0.1 0.8 HAAS MIDDLE 2.2 2.8 0.0 1.1 5 471 1.1 6.2 HAMLIN MIDDLE 2 660 0.3 1.8 HOMEBOUND o.o o.o 0.0 0.0 0 350 o.o 0.0 KAFFIE MIDDLE 4.5 2.7 0.6 1.0 14 583 2.4 13.6 KING H S 1.8 4.9 2.2 3.3 58 2,702 2.1 12.2 MARTIN MIDDLE 0.0 o.o 1.3 1.2 8 681 1.2 6.8 MARY GRETI CTR 0.0 o.o o.o o.o 0 50 0.0 0.0 MILLER H S 6.7 5.3 7 .2 4.7 154 2,205 7.0 35.2 MOODY H S '1.0 0.7 3.0 1.8 62 2,251 2.8 15.4 RAY H S 1. 7 2.8 3.4 3.7 86 2,842 3.0 16.8 SLGC 6.9 5.8 3.1 2.0 30 798 3.8 20.5 SOUTH PARK MIDDLE 4 632 0.6 3.7 TEENAGE MOTHER 12.0 9.1 3.2 3.4 10 223 4.5 24.1 WYNN SEALE MIDDLE 1. 4 2.9 1.4 0.6 11 702 1.6 9.0
0.0 o.o 0.0 0.0 0 67 0.0 0.0 DRISCOLL EL 0.0 o.o o.o 0.0 0 67 0.0 0.0
0.5 o.o 2.5 0.4 24 2, 737 0.9 5.2
FLOUR BLUFF ALTER c o.o o.o 0.0 0.0 0 168 0.0 0.0 FLOUR BLUFF H S 0.9 o.o 3.8 0.8 23 1,681 1.4 7.9 FLOUR BLUFF J H 1 1 ,025 0.1 0.6
0.0 o.o 0.0 0.0 0 34 0.0 0.0 LONDON EL o.o o.o 0.0 0.0 0 34 0.0 0.0
3 297 1.0 5.9 BRUNDRETI MIDDLE 0.0 o.o o.o 0.0 0 120 0.0 0.0 PORT ARANSAS H S 3 177 1. 7 9.8
0.0 3.3 2.8 1.7 55 2,019 2.7 15.3 ACADEMY FOR EXCELLE 0.0 o.o 0.0 0.0 0 78 0.0 o.o ALTEA LAN CTR 0.0 o.o 5.2 2.3 10 202 5.0 26.3 ROBSTOWN H S 0.0 5.0 3.2 2.1 40 1,259 3.2 17.6 SEALE J H 0.0 o.o 0.8 0.6 5 647 0.8 4.6
1.1 o.o 1.4 1.6 19 1,533 1.2 7.2 ALTER ED CTR 26.1 o.o 16.0 23.1 14 75 18.7 71.1 TULOSO-MIDWAY H S 0.4 o.o 0.6 0.7 5 977 0.5 3.0 TULOSO-MIOWAY MIDDL 0.0 o.o 0.0 0.0 0 510 0.0 0.0
3.0 o.7 2.8 1.6 26 1,024 2.5 14.3 WEST OSO H S 6.3 1.1 4.1 2.7 24 648 3.7 20.3 WEST OSO J H 2 378 0.5 3.1
NOTE: A DASH (-) INDICATES DATA ARE NOT REPORTED TO PROTECT STUDENT ANONYMITY.
95
APPENDIX 8 1996-97 CAMPUS DETAIL BY DISTRICT
DROPOUT RATES BY ETHNICITY, ANNUAL DROPOUT RATE, AND ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
COUNTY
OCHILTREE
OLDHAM
ORANGE
PALO PINTO
PANOLA
DISTRICT
PERRYTON ISD
ADRIAN ISO
BOYS RANCH ISO
VEGA ISO
BRIDGE CITY ISO
LIT CYPRESS-MAC
ORANGEFIELD ISO
VIDOR ISO
WEST ORANGE-GOV
GORDON ISO
GRAFORD ISO
MINERAL WELLS I
SANTO ISO
STRAWN ISO
BECKIJILLE ISO
CARTHAGE ISO
GARY ISO
CAMPUS
WHITE DROPOUT
RATE
AFR. AM DROPOUT
RATE
HISP DROPOUT
RATE
ECON DIS DROPOUT
RATE
1996-97 TOTAL
DROPOUTS
1996-97 7-12
ENROLLMENT
1996-97 DROPOUT
RATE
ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
·PERRYTON H S PERRYTON J H
1 .0 1. 6 0 0
0.0 0.0 0.0
2.7 4.3 0.0
2.6 4.8 0.0
14 14
0
947 607 340
1.5 1.5 2.3 0.0
8.6 8.6
13.1 0.0
ADRIAN SCHOOL 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 o.o
0 0
54 54
1.2 0.0 0.0
6.8 0.0 0.0
BLAKEMORE MIDDLE BOYS RANCH H S
0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o 3 0 3
347 111 236
0.9 0.0 1.3
5.1 0.0 7.4
VEGA H S 4 4
204 204
2.0 2.0
11.2 11.2
BRIDGE CITY H $ BRIDGE CITY J H
0.7 1.0
0.0 0.0
5.9 10.5
1 .o 1.1
11 10
1
1,424 900 524
1.4 0.8 1.1 0.2
8.2 4.6 6.5 1.1
LIT CYPR-MRCEVILLE LITTLE CYPRESS J H MAURICEVILLE MIDDLE
1.4 1.8
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.9 1.5
25 22
2 1
2,047 1,367
450 245
1.2 1.6 0.4 0.4
7.1 9.3 2.6 2. 4
ORANGEFIELO H S ORANGEFIELO J H
1.2 1 .8 0 0
0.0 0.0 0.0
9.5 14.3 0.0
4.0 6.6 0.0
11 11
0
810 532 278
1.4 2.1 0.0
7.9 11.8 0.0
AIMSCTR VIDOR H S VIDOR J H
H S 1 .5
11. 7 0.7 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
1.2 14.3 1.1 0.0
39 27 12
0
2,692 235
1,658 902
1.4 11. 5 0. 7 0.0
8.4 51.9 4.3 0.0
WEST ORANGE-COVE ED WEST ORANGE-STARK H WEST ORANGE-STARK M
1.3 5.7 1.5 0.0
2.5 11 .4 2.1 0.0
5.4 25.0 6.5 0.0
1. 7 4.5 2.5 o.o
34 15 19
0
1>719 162
1,010 625
2 .0 9 3 1. 9 0.0
11.3 44.2 10.8 0.0
GORDON SCHOOL 128 128
2.2 0.8 0.8
12.6 4.6 4.6
GRAFORD H S 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0 0
0 0
o.o o.o
0 0
204 204
o.o 0.0
0 0
0 0
MINERAL WELL H S MINERAL WELLS J H
2.9 3.9 1.1
1.2 1.7 0.0
3.1 3.9 1.9
2 7 3 7 1. 7
45 38
7
1,629 1,023
607
2.8 3.7 1.2
15.5 20.3 6.7
SANTO H S 4 4
188 188
2.1 2.1
12.1 12.1
STRAWN SCHOOL 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
o.o o.o
0 0
116 116
0 0
0 0
0.0 0.0
BECKVILLE H S BECKVILLE MIDDLE
1. 7 2.5 0.0
2.2 3.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
2.9 4.8 0.0
5 5 0
290 199
91
0 9 1. 7 2.5 0.0
5.3 9.9
14.2 0.0
CARTHAGE H $ CARTHAGE J H
0.7 1.0 0.0
1.4 2.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.7 1.1 0.0
14 14
0
1,698 1,095
603
0.8 1.3 0.0
4.9 7.4 0.0
GARY SCHOOL 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
o.o o.o
0 0
131 131
0.0 0.0
o.o 0.0
NOTE: A DASH ( -) INDICATES DATA ARE NOT REPORTED TO PROTECT STUDENT ANONYMITY.
96
APPENDIX B
1996-97 CAMPUS DETAIL BY DISTRICT
DROPOUT RATES BY ETHNICITY, ANNUAL DROPOUT RATE 1 ANO ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
COUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS
WHITE DROPOUT
RATE
AFR. AM DROPOUT
RATE
HISP DROPOUT
RATE
ECON DIS DROPOUT
RATE
1996-97 TOTAL
DROPOUTS
1996-97 7-12
ENROLLMENT
1996-97 DROPOUT
RATE
ESTIMA.TED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
PARKER ALEDO ISO
ALEDO H S ALEDO MIDDLE o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0
2 2 0
1J171 778 393
1.0 0.2 0.3 o.o
5. 7 1.0 1.5 o.o
BROCK ISO BROCK H S
0.0 0.0
o.o o.o
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0 0
250 250
0.0 0.0
o.o o.o
GARNER ISO GARNER EL
0.0 0.0
o.o 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0 0
48 48
o.o 0.0
o.o o.o
MILLSAP ISO MILLSAP H s
2 2
341 341
0.6 0.6
3.5 3.5
PEASTEA ISO PEASTEA PEASTER
HS MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 o.o 0.0
3 3 0
372 240 132
a.a 1.3 o.o
4.7 7.3 o.o
POOLVILLE ISO POOLVILLE SCHOOL
174 174
0.6 0.6
3.4 3.4
SPRINGTOWN ISO SPRINGTOWN SPRINGTOWN SPRINGTOWN YALE
H S LIPSTAEU MIDDLE
1.9 3.3
0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0
2.9 4.8
0.0
1.2 2.5
0.0
30 30
0
1 ,479 874
556
2.0 3.4
0.0
,, .6 18.9
o.o
WEATHERFORD ISO HALL MIDDLE WEATHERFORD H s
1.0
1.5
o.o
0.0
0.9
1.5
1.1
1.9
29 1
28
3, 132 1, 118 2,016
0.9 0.1 1.4
5.4 0.5 8.1
PARMER BOVINA ISO
BOVINA H S BOVINA MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
4 4 0
265 167
98
1.1 1.5 2.4 0.0
6.7 •. 7
13.5 o.o
FARWELL ISO FARWELL H S FARWELL J H
o.o 0.0 o.o
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
0 0 0
268 180
" 0.0 0.0 o.o
o.o o.o o.o
FRIONA ISO FRIONA H s FRIONA J H
1.0 1.4 0.0
o.o 0.0 0.0
1.9 3.0 0.0
0.7 1.1 0.0
9 9 0
578 377 201
1.6 2.4 0.0
9.0 13.5 o.o
LAZBUDDIE ISO LAZBUODIE SCHOOL
117 117
0.9 0.9
5.0 5.0
PECOS BUENA VISTA ISO
BUENA VISTA SCHOOL 94 94
2.4 1.1 1.1
13.6 6.2 6.2
FT STOCKTON ISO BUTZ EDUCATION CTR FORT STOCKTON H S FOAT STOCKTON MIDDL
0.6 6.7 0.4 o.o
0.0 0.0 o.o 0.0
3.7 12.3 4.5 0.0
3.0 13.2 4.1 0.0
43 11 32
0
1,491 98
938 493
2.9 11.2 3.4 0.0
16.1 51.1 18.8 o.o
IRAAN-SHEFFIELD IRAAN H S IRAAN J H T Y C SHEFFIELD CAM
0.0 0.0
0.0 o.o
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
1 1 0 0
282 186 96 91
0.4 0.5 0.0 o.o
2.1 3.2 o.o o.o
POLK BIG SANDY ISO
BIG SANDY SCHOOL 199 199
1.4 0.5 0.5
8.3 3.0 3.0
CORRIGAN-CAMDEN CORRIGAN-CAMDEN CORRIGAN-CAMDEN
H s J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
4 4 0
544 368 177
0.7 1.1 o.o
4.3 6.4 o.o
NOTE: A DASH (-) INDICATES DATA ARE NOT REPORTED TO PROTECT STUDENT ANONYMITY.
97
APPENDIX B 1995.97 CAMPUS DETAIL BY DISTRICT
DROPOUT RATES BY ETHNICITY, ANNUAL DROPOUT RATE, ANO ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
WHITE AFR. AM HISP ECON DIS 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 ESTIMATED DROPOUT DROPOUT DROPOUT DROPOUT TOTAL 7-12 DROPOUT LONGITUDINAL
COUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS RATE RATE RATE RATE DROPOUTS ENROLLMENT RATE DROPOUT RATE
POLK GOODRICH ISO 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 173 0.0 0.0 GOODRICH H S 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 173 0.0 0.0
LEGGETT ISO 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 111 0 0 0.0
LEGGETT H S 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 111 0 0 0.0
LIVINGSTON ISO 1. 9 2.2 2.9 2.1 40 2,014 2 0 11 .3 LIVINGSTON H S 2.6 3.2 5.4 4.0 38 1 ,332 2 9 15 9 LIVINGSTON J H 2 682 0 3 1. 8
ONALASKA ISO 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 142 0 0 0.0 ONALASKA MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 142 0 0 0.0
POTTER 2.7 15.3 AMARILLO ISO 2.1 4.5 4.4 2 0 387 13,284 2.9 16.3
AMARILLO CTR ADVANC 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 23 0.0 0.0 AMARILLO H S 1.5 3.0 7.4 3 0 46 2,408 1.9 10.9 AUSTIN MIDDLE 0.9 0.0 2.6 1. 0 7 579 1.2 7.0 BONHAM MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 671 0.0 0.0 BOWIE MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.8 6 772 0.8 4.6 CAPROCK H S 4.6 5.7 7 .1 4.9 109 1,853 5.9 30.5 CROCKETT MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 525 0.0 0.0 FANNIN MIDDLE 2 476 0.4 2.5 HOMEBOUND 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 48 0.0 0.0 HOUSTON MIDDLE 0.9 0.8 2.1 1. 3 8 748 1.1 6.3 MANN MIDDLE 1 475 0.2 1.3 NORTH HEIGHTS AL TEA 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 536 0.0 0.0 PALO CURO H S 5.1 7.2 5.6 3.8 105 1,876 5.6 29.2 TASCOSA H S 3.5 9.4 5.1 5.5 99 2,335 4 2 22.9 TRAVIS MIDDLE 4 707 0 6 3.4
BUSHLAND ISO 0.0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 122 0 0 0 0 BUSHLAND MIDDLE 0.0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 122 0 0 0 0
HIGHLAND PARK 3 394 o 0 4.5 HIGHLAND PARK H S 3 394 o 0 4.5
RIVER ROAD ISO 0.4 0.0 3.4 0.7 5 792 0 6 3. 7 RIVER ROAD J H-H S 0.4 0.0 3.4 0.7 5 792 0 6 3. 7
PRESIDIO 3 0 16.9 MARFA ISO 4 216 1. 9 10.6
MARFA EL o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 73 0 0 0.0 MARFA H S 4 143 2 0 15. 7
PRESIDIO ISO 0.0 0.0 3.5 3.3 23 677 3.4 18. 7 CANDELARIA EL 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 8 0.0 0.0 FRANCO MIDDLE 3 248 1.2 7.0 PRESIDIO H S 0.0 0.0 4.8 4.8 20 422 4.7 25.3
RAINS 3.2 11 0 RAINS ISO 3.2 3.3 3.6 2.4 24 746 3.2 17 .8
RAINS ALTER ED RAINS H S 2.6 0.0 0.0 2.8 11 460 2.4 13.5 RAINS J H 1 267 0.4 2.2 VAN ZANDT-RAINS C0-0
RANDALL 0.2 1.2 CANYON ISO 0.2 0.0 0.3 0.5 7 3,517 0.2 1. 2
CANYON H S 2 896 0.2 1 .3 CANYON J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 485 0.0 0 0 RANDALL H S 0.4 0.0 1. 3 2.6 5 1 ,005 0.5 3 0 VALLEYVIEW J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 772 0.0 0.0 WESTOVER PARK INT 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 389 0.0 0 0 YOUTH CTR OF HIGH P 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 314 0.0 0 0
REAGAN 0.2 1. 1 REAGAN COUNTY I 546 0.2 1. 1
REAGAN COUNTY H S 1 363 0.3 1. 6 REAGAN COUNTY MIDDL 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 185 0.0 0.0
NOTE: A DASH (-} INDICATES DATA ARE NOT REPORTED TO PROTECT STUDENT ANONYMITY.
98
APPENDIX B
1996-97 CAMPUS DETAIL BY DISTRICT
DROPOUT RATES BY ETHNICITY, ANNUAL DROPOUT RATE, AND ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
WHITE AFR. AM HISP ECON DIS 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 ESTIMATED DROPOUT DROPOUT DROPOUT DROPOUT TOTAL 7-12 DROPOUT LONGITUDINAL
COUNTY OISTRICT CAMPUS RATE RATE RATE RATE DROPOUTS ENROLLMENT RATE OROPOUT RATE
REAL 0.6 3.4 LEAKEY ISO 172 0.6 3.4
LEAKEY SCHOOL 172 0.6 3.4
RED RIVER 2.1 11.9 AVERY ISO 2 187 1. 1 6.3
AVERY H S 2 123 1.6 9.4 AVERY MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 o.o 0.0 0 64 0.0 0.0
CLARKSVILLE ISO 1.6 3.1 0.0 2.6 15 649 2.3 13.1 CHEATHAM MIDDLE o.o 0.0 0.0 o.o 0 230 0.0 0.0 CLARKSVILLE H S 2.6 4.6 0.0 4.4 15 419 3.6 19.6
DETROIT ISO 4 212 1.9 10.8 DETRIOT J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 75 o.o 0.0 DETROIT H S 4 137 2.9 16.3
TALCO-BOGATA CO 1.9 0.0 11.8 2.3 6 360 2.2 12.6 BOGATA El 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 76 0.0 0.0 RIVERCREST H S 3.1 0.0 14.3 3.6 6 230 3.5 19.1 TALCO El 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o 0 56 0.0 0.0
REEVES 1.4 8.1 BALMORHEA ISO 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o 0 114 0.0 0.0
BALMORHEA SCHOOL o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 114 0.0 o.o
PECOS- BARSTOW- T 1.1 3.1 1.5 1.5 23 1,534 1.5 8 .7 CARVER ALTER ED CTR 11-1 25.0 5.6 10.3 10 156 6.4 32.8 CROCKETT MIDDLE-8TH 0.0 0.0 o.o 0.0 0 324 0.0 0.0 DE ZAVALA MIDDLE-7TH 2 265 0.7 4.1 PECOS H S 0.8 o.o 1.4 1.4 11 872 1.3 7.3 REEVES JUVENILE DET 0.0 o.o 0.0 o.o 0 16 0.0 o.o
REFUGIO 1.0 6.1 AUSTWELL- TIVOLI 0.0 0.0 o.o o.o 0 99 0.0 0.0
AUSTWELL-TIVOLI HS 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o 0 99 0.0 0.0
REFUGIO ISO o.o 1.5 2.0 2.2 5 461 1.1 6.3 REFUGIO H S o.o 2.1 3.0 3.6 5 313 1.6 9.2 REFUGIO MIDDLE o.o 0.0 0.0 o.o 0 146 o.o 0.0
WOODSBORO ISO 4 314 1.3 7.4 WOODSBORO H S 4 213 1.9 10.8 WOODSBORO J H o.o 0.0 0.0 o.o 0 101 o.o o.o
ROBERTS o.o o.o MIAMI ISO o.o o.o 0.0 o.o 0 113 0.0 0.0
MIAMI SCHOOL 0.0 o.o 0.0 o.o 0 113 0.0 o.o
ROBERTSON 2.5 13.9 BREMOND ISO 1 210 0.5 2.8
BREMOND H S 1 134 0.7 4.4 BREMOND MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 o.o o.o 0 76 0.0 0.0
CALVERT ISO 136 0.7 4.3 CALVERT H S 136 0. 7 4.3
_ FRANKLIN ISO 0.5 5.6 16.1 5.1 9 445 2.0 11.5 FRANKLIN H s 0.6 3.8 26.3 7.6 6 290 2.8 15.5 FRANKLIN J H 1 155 0.6 3.8
HEARNE ISO 3.5 3.1 4.9 3.0 27 739 3.7 20.0 HEARNE H s 5.2 5.0 7.6 5.4 27 472 5.7 29.8 HEARNE J H 0.0 0.0 o.o o.o 0 267 0.0 0.0
,.,,UMFORD ISO 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o 0 29 0.0 0.0 MUMFORD EL 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o 0 29 0.0 0.0
NOTE: A DASH (-) INDICATES DATA ARE NOT REPORTED TO PROTECT STUDENT ANONYMITY.
99
APPENDIX B 1996-97 CAMPUS DETAIL BY DISTRICT
DROPOUT RATES BY ETHNICITY, ANNUAL DROPOUT RATE, AND ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
COUNTY DISTRICT
ROCKWALL ROCKWALL ISO
ROYSE CITY ISO
RUNNELS BALLINGER ISO
MILES ISO
OLFEN ISO
WINTERS ISO
RUSK CARLISLE ISO
HENDERSON ISO
LANEVILLE ISO
LEVERETIS CHAPE
MOUNT ENTERPRIS
OVERTON ISO
TATUM ISO
WEST RUSK ISO
SABINE HEMPHILL ISO
WEST SABINE ISO
CAMPUS
WHITE DROPOUT
RATE
AFR. AM DROPOUT
RATE
HISP DROPOUT
RATE
ECON DIS DROPOUT
RATE
1996-97 TOTAL
DROPOUTS
1996-97 7-12
ENROLLMENT
1996-97 DROPOUT
RATE
ESTIMATEO LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
ATLAS ACAD HERMAN E UTLEY MIODL J WWILLIAMS MIDDLE ROCKWALL H S
1. 0 0.0
1.4
1.8 0.0
2.7
2.3 0.0
4.0
2.0 0.0
3.4
36 0 3 1
32
3,085 148 586 529
1,898
1.0 1.2 0.0 0.5 0.2 1. 7
5.9 6.8 o.o 3.0 1.1 9. 7
ROYSE CITY H S ROYSE CITY MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0
2 2 0
694 413 281
0.3 0.5 0.0
1 .7 2 9 0 0
BALLINGER H s BALLINGER J H C A P CO-OP
0.7
0.0 7 .1
0.0
0.0 0.0
3.1
0.0 57 .1
0 8
0.0 13.3
9 4 0 5
623 377 234
22
1 .6 1 .4 1. 1 0.0
22.7
9 3 8.4 6.2 o.o
78.7
C B P FAIRVIEW ACCELERATED MILES H S
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0
226
216
0.0
0.0
o.o
o.o
OLFEN EL 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0 0
20 20
0.0 0.0
o.o 0.0
C A P CO-OP WINTERS H S WINTERS J H
0.8 6.3
0.0 0.0
5.2 33.3
2.5 18.2
12 8 3 1
446 39
267 154
2 .7 20.5
1.1 0.6
15.1 74.8 6.6 3.8
CARLISLE SCHOOL 0.6 0.6
3.0 3.0
22.2 22.2
8.2 8.2
6 6
232 232
1.2 2.6 2.6
7.0 14.6 14.6
ALTER SCH HENDERSON HENDERSON
H S MIDDLE
0.5 0.0 0.8
1. 7 0.0 2.5
2.1 0.0 2.2
1.5 0.0 2.2
18 0
17 1
1,904 15
1,256 642
0.9 0.0 1.4 0.2
5.5 0.0 7.9 0.9
LANEVILLE SCHOOL 2 2
155 155
1.3 1.3
7.5 7.5
LEVERETTS CHAPEL H s 102 102
.0
.0 5.7 5.7
MT ENTERPRISE H s 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0 0
184 184
0.0 0.0
o.o 0.0
OVERTON H S 5.9 5.9
3.4 3.4
0.0 0.0
6.9 6.9
13 13
240 240
5.4 5.4
28.4 28.4
TATUM H S TATUM MIDDLE
4 3 1
650 412 238
0.6 0.7 0.4
3.6 4.3 2.5
WEST RUSK H s WEST RUSK J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
3 3 0
512 306 206
0.6 1.0 0.0
3 5 5 7 0 0
HEMPHILL H S HEMPHILL MIDDLE
1 .6 2.6
5.7 7.5
0.0 0.0
3.3 4.9
11 10
1
468 287 181
1. 7 2.4 3.5 0.6
9 6 13 3 19 2
3 3
WEST SABINE H S 2 2
324 324
0.6 0.6
3.7 3.7
NOTE: A DASH (-) INDICATES DATA ARE NOT REPORTED TO PROTECT STUDENT ANONYMITY.
100
APPENDIX B 1996-97 CAMPUS DETAIL BY DISTRICT
DROPOUT RATES BY ETHNICITY, ANNUAL DROPOUT RATE, ANO ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
COUNTY
SAN AUGUSTINE
SAN JACINTO
SAN PATRICIO
SAN SABA
SCHLEICHER
SCURRY
DISTRICT
BROADDUS !SD
SAN AUGUSTINE I
COLDSPAING-OAKH
SHEPHERD ISO
ARANSAS PASS IS
GREGORY- POATLAN
INGLESIDE ISO
MATHIS ISO
ODEM·EDAOY ISO
SINTON ISO
TAFT ISO
CHEROKEE ISO
RICHLAND SPRING
SAN SABA ISO
SCHLEICHER ISO
HEAMLEIGH ISO
CAMPUS
WHITE DROPOUT
RATE
AFR. AM DROPOUT
RATE
HISP DROPOUT
RATE
ECON DIS DROPOUT
RATE
1996-97 TOTAL
DROPOUTS
1996-97 7-12
ENROLLMENT
1996-97 DROPOUT
RATE
ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
BROADDUS H S 3 3
216 216
1.1 1.4 1.4
6.2 8.1 8.1
ACCELERATED LAN CTR SAN AUGUSTINE H S SAN AUGUSTINE INT
o.o 0.0
1.0 0.0
13.3 o.o
0.4 0.0
5 0 1 4
543 28
335 184
0.9 0.0 0.3 2.2
5.4 o.o 1.8
12.4
JONES H S LINCOLN J H 0.0 0.0 o.o 0.0
1 0
892 553 340
1.4 0.1 0.2 0.0
8.1 0.7 1. 1 o.o
SHEPHERD H S SHEPHERD J H
2.9 4.6 0.0
1. 1 1.8 o.o
3.8 6.9 o.o
2.0 3.8 0.0
23 23
0
836 527 310
2.8 4.4 0.0
15.4 23.5
o.o
A C BLUNT MIDDLE ARANSAS PASS H S
1.3 0.0 2.1
4.4 0.0 6.9
2.5 o.o 4.1
1.8 0.0 3.5
20 0
20
1,041 413 630
1.2 1.9 0.0 3.2
7.0 11.0 o.o
17 .6
GREGORY-PORTLAND H GREGORY-PORTLAND J H
0.5 0.7
0.0 0.0
1.5 2.3
1.5 3.1
19 18
1
2,078 1,326
753
0.9 1.4 0.1
5.4 7.9 o.8
INGLESIDE H S LEON TAYLOR J H
0.9 1.2
0.0 0.0
2.6 2.3
1.5 1.4
12 8 4
866 547 319
1.4 1.5 1.3
8.0 8.5 7.3
MATHIS H S MCCRAW J H SUNRISE ED CTR
0.0 0.0
0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0
o.8 1.2
o.o
0.6 1.1
o.o
7 6 1 0
1,066 627 420
91
0.7 1.0 0.2 0.0
3.9 5.6 1.4 o.o
ODEM H S ODEM J H
0.6 0.9 0.0
0.0 0.0 o.o
0.9 1. 4 o.o
0.9 1.5 0.0
5 5 0
612 399 213
0.8 1.3 0.0
4.8 7.3 o.o
ALTER ED PROG JUVENILE DETENT CTR SINTON H S SMITH J H
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
3.0 o.o 0.0 4.0 0.0
2.4 o.o o.o 4.4 0.0
2.5 0.0 0.0 4.8 0.0
24 0 0
24 0
1,297 45
236 708 380
1.9 0.0 0.0 3.4 0.0
10.6 o.o o.o
18.7 0.0
ALTEA ED CAMPUS SHO TAFT H S TAFT J H
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.9 o.o 1.6 o.o
1.1 0.0 2.1 0.0
6 0 6 0
912 210 442 261
0.7 0.0 1.4 0.0
3.9 o.o 7.9 o.o
CHEROKEE H S 0.0 o.o
0.0 0.0
o.o o.o
0.0 0.0
0 0
111 111
0.9 0.0 0.0
5.4 o.o o.o
RICHLAND SPRINGS SCH 4 4
101 101
4.0 4.0
21.5 21.5
SAN SABA H S SAN SABAJ H o.o 0.0 o.o 0.0
2 2 0
436 277 159
0.5 0.7 0.0
2.7 4.3 o.o
ELDORADO H S ELDORADO MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 o.o 0.0
4 4 0
376 238 138
1.1 1.1 1.7 o.o
6.2 6.2 9.7 o.o
HERMLEIGH SCHOOL 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
o.o 0.0
o.o o.o
0 0
102 102
1.0 0.0 0.0
5. 7 o.o o.o
NOTE: A DASH (-) INDICATES DATA ARE NOT REPORTED TO PROTECT STUDENT ANONYMITY.
101
APPENDIX B 1996-97 CAMPUS DETAIL BY DISTRICT
DROPOUT RATES BY ETHNICITY, ANNUAL DROPOUT RATE, AND ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
COUNTY
SCURRY
SHACKELFORD
SHELBY
SHERMAN
SMITH
DISTRICT
IRA ISO
SNYDER ISO
ALBANY ISO
MORAN ISO
CENTER ISO
EXCELSIOR ISO
JOAQUIN ISO
SHELBYVILLE !SD
TENAHA ISO
TIMPSON ISO
STRATFORD ISO
TEXHOMA ISO
ARP ISO
BULLARD ISO
CHAPEL HILL ISO
LINDALE ISO
TROUP ISO
CAMPUS
WHITE DROPOUT
RATE
AFR. AM DROPOUT
RATE
HISP DROPOUT
RATE
ECON DIS DROPOUT
RATE
1996-97 TOTAL
DROPOUTS
1996-97 7-12
ENROLLMENT
1996-97 DROPOUT
RATE
ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
IRA SCHOOL 104 104
1.0 1.0
5.6 5.6
HOBBS AL TEA SNYDER H S SNYDER J H
ED C0-0 0.6 17.9
0.0
1. 7 2D.O
0.0
1. 7 10.6
0.0
0.6 7.5
o.o
17 13
4 0
1,65B 99
1,052 564
1.0 13.1
0 4 0 0
6.0 57.0 2.3 0.0
ALBANY JR-SR H S 283 283
0 6 0.4 0.4
3 2 2
5 1 1
MORAN SCHOOL 63 63
1. 6 1. 6
9 9
2 2
CENTER CENTER
H s J H
1.2 1.8 0.0
2.2 3.5 0.0
1.1 1.6 0.0
1 .4 2 5 0 0
16 16
0
1 ,097 707 390
1 .8 1 .5 2.3 o.o
10.4 8.4
12.8 0.0
EXCELSIOR EL 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
o.o o.o
0 0
14 14
0 0
0 0
0.0 o.o
JOAQUIN H s 1. 7 1. 7
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
2.9 2.9
5 5
312 312
.6
.6 9.2 9.2
SHELBYVILLE SCHOOL 2.1 2.1
6.4 6.4
D.D D.D
3.3 3.3
11 11
349 349
3,2 3.2
17.5 17.5
TENAHA H S 3 3
185 185
1.6 1.6
9.3 9.3
SHELBY CO SP TIMPSON EL TIMPSON H S
ED CTR 0.4 D.0 0.0 0.7
4.6 0.0 0.0 8.3
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
1.4 D.O o.o 2.9
6 0 0 6
348 18
115 217
1. 7 0.0 0.0 2.8
9.9 0.0 0.0
15.5
STRATFORD H S STRATFORD J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o
2 2 0
267 178 89
0.5 0. 7 1. 1 0.0
2 9 4 4 6.6 0.0
TEXHOMA EL 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
o.o o.o
0 0
143 143
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
ARP H s ARP J H
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
o.o o.o o.o
0 0 0
456 287 169
1.6 0.0 0.0 0.0
9.2 0.0 0.0 0.0
BULLARD BULLARD
H S MIDDLE
2.1 3.4
0.0 0.0
6.3 0.0
4.6 5.2
12 11
568 355 213
2.1 3.1 0.5
12.0 17 .2 2.8
CHAPEL HILL H S CHAPEL HILL MIDDLE S T E P S
1.2 1.9 0.0 0.0
0.4 0. 7 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.4 0.7 o.o o.o
14 14
0 0
1,644 1,023
614 69
0.9 1.4 0.0 0.0
5 7 0 0
0 9 0 0
LINDALE H S LINDALE MIDDLE
0.8 1 .2 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
2.3 3.4 0.0
0.6 1.3 o.o
10 10
0
1,226 828 399
0.8 1 .2 0.0
4.8 7.0 0.0
TROUP H S TROUP MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o
1 0
444 288 156
0 .2 0 .3 0.0
1.3 2.1 0.0
NOTE: A DASH {-) INDICATES DATA ARE NOT REPORTED TO PROTECT STUDENT ANONYMITY.
!02
APPENDIX B 1996-97 CAMPUS DETAIL BY DISTRICT
DROPOUT RATES BY ETHNICITY, ANNUAL DROPOUT RATE, AND ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
COUNTY
SMITH
SOMERVELL
STARR
STEPHENS
STERLING
STONEWALL
SUTTON
SWISHER
DISTRICT
TYLER ISO
WHITEHOUSE ISO
WINONA ISO
GLEN ROSE ISO
RIO GRANDE CITY
ROMA ISO
SAN ISIDRO ISO
BRECKENRIDGE IS
STERLING CITY I
ASPERMONT ISO
SONORA ISO
HAPPY ISO
WHITE AFR. AM HISP ECON DIS 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 ESTIMATED DROPOUT DROPOUT DROPOUT DROPOUT TOTAL 7-12 DROPOUT LONGITUDINAL
CAMPUS RATE RATE RATE RATE DROPOUTS ENROLLMENT RATE DROPOUT RATE
1.2 2.9 2.6 2.3 154 7,611 2.0 11. 5 SOULTER MIDDLE 1 471 0.2 1.3 DOGAN MIDDLE 1 359 0.3 1.7 GLENWOOD ALTER MIDD 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 140 0.0 0.0 HOGG MIDDLE 0.0 o.o o.o 0.0 0 370 0.0 0.0 HUBBARD MIDDLE 0.0 o.o 0.0 0.0 0 814 0.0 0.0 JOHN TYLER H S 2.9 2.5 4.4 2.6 64 2,061 3.1 17 .2 LEE H S 0.4 1.9 1.7 2.7 20 2,539 0.8 4.6 MOORE MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 o.o 0.0 0 434 0.0 0.0 PACE· TAAP ALTER 13.9 27 .1 10.3 31. 9 66 351 18.8 71.3 ROBERTS SCH 2 392 0,5 3.0 SPECIAL SERVICES AN o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 18 o.o 0.0 ST LOUIS SP ED EL o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 49 o.o 0.0 STEWART MIDDLE o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 431 0.0 0.0
0.9 4.6 0.0 2.0 24 1,817 1.3 7.7 HOLLOWAY MIDDLE 4 663 0.6 3.6 WHITEHOUSE H S 1.2 6.7 0.0 2.2 20 1'154 1.7 10.0
1.6 0.0 5.9 0.0 7 493 1. 4 8.2 WINONA H S 2.3 o.o 10.0 0.0 7 323 2.2 12.3 WINONA MIDDLE o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 178 0.0 0.0
2.3 12.8 2.1 0.0 3.7 0.5 17 751 2.3 12.8
GLEN ROSE H S 3.1 0.0 5.9 0.9 17 498 3.4 18.8 GLEN ROSE J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 254 0.0 0.0
2.2 12.6 0.0 0.0 2.5 2.4 91 3,680 2.5 14.0
COMMUNITY BASED ALT 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o 0 246 0.0 o.o GRULLA MIDDLE 3 404 0.7 4 .4 RINGGOLD MIDDLE 2 955 0.2 1.3 RIO GRANDE CITY H S 0.0 0.0 3.9 3.8 86 2,214 3.9 21.2
0.0 0.0 2.0 1.8 53 2,722 1.9 11. 1 ACCELERATED LRN ACA o.o 0.0 10.8 7.7 10 93 10.8 49.5 INSTR & GUIDE CTR 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 78 o.o 0.0 ROMA H S 0.0 0.0 1.2 1.2 20 1,660 1.2 7.0 ROMA. MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 2.3 2.3 23 988 2.3 13.2
158 0.6 3.7 SAN ISIDRO SCHOOL 158 0.6 3.7
1.5 8,5 1.2 4.0 2.4 0.4 14 959 1.5 8.5
BRECKENRIDGE H S 1. 9 4.8 3.8 0.8 14 618 2.3 12.9 BRECKENRIDGE J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 340 o.o 0.0 TS TC ALTER 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 45 0.0 0.0
1.1 6.4 2 184 1.1 6.4
C B P FAIRVIEW ACCELERATED 5 20.0 73.8 GRAPE CREEK SPECIAL STERLING CITY H S 1 123 0.8 4.B STERLING CITY J H o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 55 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 188 0.0 0.0
ASPERMONT H S 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o 0 114 o.o 0.0 ASPERMONT J H 0.0 0.0 o.o 0.0 0 74 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o 0.0 0 524 0.0 0.0
SONORA H S 0.0 0.0 o.o 0.0 0 337 0.0 0.0 SONORA J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 187 0.0 0.0
1.9 11.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 126 0.0 o.o
HAPPY H S o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 B5 0.0 0.0 HAPPY MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 41 0.0 0.0
NOTE: A DASH (-) INDICATES DATA ARE NOT REPORTED TO PROTECT STUDENT ANONYMITY.
103
APPENDIX B 1996-97 CAMPUS DETAIL BY DISTRICT
DROPOUT RATES BY ETHNICITY, ANNUAL DROPOUT RATE, AND ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
COUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS
WHITE DROPOUT
RATE
AFR. AM DROPOUT
RATE
HISP DROPOUT
RATE
ECON OIS DROPOUT
RATE
1996-97 TOTAL
DROPOUTS
1996-97 7-12
ENROLLMENT
1996-97 DROPOUT
RATE
ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
SWISHER KRESS ISO KRESS H s
2 2
196 196
1.0 1.0
6.0 6.0
TULIA ISO TULIA H s TULIA J H
2.3 3.4 0.0
5.6 8.3 0.0
2.3 4.3 0.0
1.2 2.4 o.o
17 17
0
668 403 265
2.5 4.2 0.0
14.3 22.6 0.0
TARRANT ARLINGTON ISO
ARLINGTON H s BAILEY J H BARNETT J H BOLES J H BOWIE H S CARTER J H GUNN J H HOMEBOUND HOUSTON H S HUTCHESON J H LAMAR H S MARTIN H S NEWCOMER CTR NICHOLS J H SHACKELFORD J H TURNING POINT ALTER TURNING POINT ALTER VENTURE ALTER H S WORKMAN J H YOUNG J H
1.2 0.5 0.6 0.1
2.3 1. 0
0.0 1.6 0.5 1.4 0.6 0.0 0.7
2.1 11.5
0.0
2.3 1.6 0.0 1.0
3.5 2.0
0.0 2.5 0.4 3.8 0.0 0.0 0.9
2.5 16.1
0.0
3.3 1.8 2.3 0.6
4.7 4.2
0.0 2.2 1.2 1.5 0.0 8.2 1 .6
1.1 20.4
0.0
1.9 1.4 o.o o.o
4.3 1.9
o.o 2.4 0.6 3.3 o.o 5.1 0.5
2.4 15.4
0.0
406 17
8 6 2
74 32
2 0
41 10 34 14 18 14
3 3 8
118 2 0
24,262 2,241 1,267 1,342 1,420 2,505 1,296 1,ooa
189 1 ,984 1 ,496 1,898 2,661
266 1,519 1, 120
178 415 866 927
1,403
1. 7 1. 7 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.1 3.0 2.5 0.2 0.0 2.1 0.7 1.8 0.5 6.8 0.9 0.3 1. 7 1.9
13.6 0.2 0.0
10.0 9.6 4.5 3.7 2.7 0.8
16.5 13.9
1.2 0.0
11 .8 3.9
10.3 3.1
34.3 5.4 1.6 9. 7
11.0 58.5 1.3 0.0
AZLE ISO AZLE H S AZLE J H W E HOOVER EL
0.4 0.6 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.2 0.5 o.o o.o
10 10
0 0
2,797 1, 711 1,080
6
0.4 0.6 0.0 0.0
2.1 3.5 0.0 0.0
BIRDVILLE ISO ALTER CTR APOLLO G E D HALLIE SHANNON LRN HALTOM HS HALTOM MIDDLE HOMEBOUND NORTH OAKS MIDDLE NORTH RICHLAND MIDD NORTH RIDGE MIDDLE RICHLAND H S RICHLAND MIDDLE SMITHFIELD MIDDLE WATAUGA MIDDLE
1.2 0.7 0.0
4.6 2.3
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1. 1
0.0 0.0
0.4 0.0 0.0
8.3 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
1.6 7.4 0.0
8.1 1.1
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0
0.0 0.0
1. 3 3.2 0.0
3.8 2.1
o.o 0.0 0.0 o.o 1.4
o.o o.o
119 6 0 4
16 60
1 0 0 0 0
31 1 0 0
9,411 360 97 62
320 2,889
558 30
371 522 590
2,809 345 532 523
1.3 1. 7 0.0 6.5 5.0 2.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.3 0.0 0.0
7.4 9.6 0.0
33.0 26.5 11.8
1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.4 1. 7 0.0 0.0
CARROLL ISO CARROLL H S CARROLL MIDDLE
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
o.o 0.0 0.0
o.o o.o o.o
0 0 0
2, 199 1,377
823
0 0 0 0 0. 0
0.0 0.0 0.0
CASTLEBERRY ISO CASTLEBERRY H s MARSH MIDDLE REACH H S T R U C E
2.2 2.8
0.0 0.0
2.0 3.2
1 .3 1 .9
32 25
2 3 2
1 ,537 880 586 102
59
2.1 2.8 0.3 2.9 3.4
11. 9 15.9 2.0
16.4 16.7
CROWLEY ISO CROWLEY H S CROWLEY MIDDLE H F STEVENS MIDDLE
0.6 1 .0 0.0 0.0
0.4 0.7 0.0 0.0
0.5 0.9 0.0 0.0
0.5 0.9 o.o o.o
20 20
0 0
3,581 2,232
584 769
0.6 0.9 0.0 0.0
3.3 5.3 0.0 0.0
EAGLE MT-SAGINA ALTER DISCIPLINE CAM BOSWELL H S 0 A S I S LAN CTR WAYSIDE MIDDLE
1.4
1.9 5.9 0.0
0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
2.7
2.2 33.3 0.0
1.5
1.9 13.3 o.o
44 2
32 10 0
2,598 102
1,595 90
955
1. 7 2.0 2.0
11.1 0.0
9.7 11.2 11.5 50.7 0.0
EVERMAN ISO EVERMAN EVERMAN
H s J H
2.7 4.4 0.0
1.3 2.2 0.0
1.0 1. 7 0.0
0.9 1. 9 O.o
27 27
0
1 ,629 965 664
1 .7 2 8 0 0
9.5 15.7 0.0
NOTE: A DASH (·) INDICATES DATA ARE NOT REPORTED TO PROTECT STUDENT ANONYMITY.
104
APPENDIX B
1996-97 CAMPUS DETAIL BY DISTRICT
DROPOUT RATES BY ETHNICITY, ANNUAL DROPOUT RATE, AND ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
WHITE AFR. AM HISP ECON DIS 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 ESTIMATED DROPOUT DROPOUT DROPOUT DROPOUT TOTAL 7-12 DROPOUT LONGITUDINAL
COUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS RATE RATE RATE RATE DROPOUTS ENROLLMENT RATE DROPOUT RATE
TARRANT FORT WORTH !SD 1.7 2,5 3.3 1.0 020 32,745 2.5 14.2
ACCELERATED H S D.D 2.7 6.6 3.5 13 364 3.6 19.6
APPLIED LEARNING AC D.D 0.0 o.o 0.0 0 176 0.0 0.0 ARLINGTON HEIGHTS H 0.3 2.3 2.5 1. 7 18 1,608 1.1 6.5 BLAKEMORE ED CTR 3 49 6.1 31.5 BOULEVARD HEIGHTS o.o 0.0 o.o 0.0 0 31 0.0 o.o BRIDGE ASSOC o.o 0.0 o.o 0.0 0 127 0.0 o.o CARTER-RIVERSIDE H 2.1 2.0 3.7 2.4 29 901 3.2 17.B
CASSATA LAN CTR 3 69 4.3 23.4
CHILDREN'S MEDICAL 0.0 0.0 o.o 0.0 0 218 0.0 o.o COMMUNITY ALTER PRO 0.0 0.0 o.o 0.0 0 00 0.0 o.o CTR FOR NEW LIVES 1B.9 17.1 25.1 12.2 120 597 20.1 74.0
DAGGETI MIDDLE 2 542 0.4 2.2 OETENT CTR 2 674 0.3 1.0 DIAMOND HILL-JARVIS 2 949 0.2 1.3 DUNBAR H S 0.9 2.6 2.0 2.2 33 1,453 2.3 12.9 DUNBAR MIDDLE 0.D 0.0 O.D 0.0 0 771 0.0 o.o DUNBAR 6TH GR SCH EASTERN HILLS H S 2.0 1. 1 4.4 1.9 27 1,550 1.7 10.0 EIDSON YOUTH CTR 0.0 0.0 o.o 0.0 0 33 o.o o.o ELDER MIDDLE 4 865 0.5 2.7 EXCEL CTR 0.0 0.0 o.o 0.0 0 184 o.o o.o FOREST OAK MIDDLE 1.9 1. 1 o.o 1.2 10 966 1.0 6.1 HANDLEY MIDDLE 1 531 0.2 1.1 HOMEBOUND o.o 0.0 o.o 0.0 0 133 0.0 o.o HORIZON MIDDLE 15.0 3.4 o.o 1.1 7 196 3.6 19.6 INT'L NEWCOMER ACAD 2 276 0.7 4.3 JAMES MIDDLE 4 800 0.5 3.0 JESSE JACKSON ALTEA 4.5 4.8 3.0 3.6 18 391 4.6 24.6 JO KELLY SP ED 0.0 0.0 o.o 0.0 0 35 0.0 o.o KIRKPATRICK MIDDLE 4 358 1. 1 6 .5 LENA POPE AOOL TRNG 3 76 3.9 21.5 LEONARD MIDDLE 2 656 0.3 1.8 M HANRATTY LEARNING 14.3 11.4 11.B 0.0 8 66 12.1 53.9 MCLEAN MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 o.o 0.0 0 677 0.0 o.o MEACHAM MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 o.o 0.0 0 611 o.o o.o MEADOWBROOK MIDDLE 3.3 0.5 3.0 0.6 10 804 1.2 7.2 METRO OPPORTUNITY 5.4 3.9 4,5 4.4 24 572 4.2 22. 7
MIDDLE LVL LAN CTR 3.7 0.9 3.0 0.9 6 240 2.5 14.l MONNIG MIDDLE 2 718 0.3 1. 7 MORNINGSIDE MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 o.o 0.0 0 471 o.o o.o NORTH SIDE H S 1.9 0.0 1.6 0.9 27 1,827 1.5 8.6 0 D WVATI H S 4.1 2.0 2.5 1.4 42 1,891 2.2 12.6 PASCHAL H S 1.1 1.0 3.9 2.0 66 2,688 2.5 13.9 PATHWAYS LEARNING CT 3 89 3.4 18.6 POLYTECHNIC H S 0.0 3.9 4.1 2.1 45 1,227 3.7 20.1 RIVERSIDE MIDDLE 3.2 0.0 2.3 1.7 14 667 2.1 12.0 ROSEMONT MIDDLE 3 951 0.3 1.9 SERVICE, EMPLOY, RE 10.0 4.8 4.7 2 .7 10 181 5.5 28.9 SOUTHWEST H S 1.4 2.2 3.7 2.0 45 2, 175 2.1 11-B STRIPLING MIDDLE o.o 0.8 2. 7 1.2 0 624 1.3 7.5 SUCCESS H S 28.1 23.7 27.4 9.3 123 466 26.4 84.1 TRANSITION CTR 1 40 2.2 12.4 TRIMBLE TECHNICAL H 0.0 0.0 3.9 1.9 36 1,400 2.6 14.5 TRINITY SPRINGS 0.0 0.0 o.o 0.0 0 14 0.0 o.o WEDGWOOD MIDDLE 3 1'195 0.3 1.5 WEDGWOOD 6TH GR SCH WESTERN HILLS H S 2.7 1.6 2.4 2 .2 40 1,709 2.3 13.3 WILLOUGHBY HOUSE 3 27 11.1 50.7 WOMEN'S HAVEN 0.0 0.0 o.o 0.0 0 30 0.0 0.0
GRAPEVINE·COLLE 0.3 1.4 1.6 0.0 22 5,770 0.4 2.3 CHARTER HOSPITAL o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 186 0.0 o.o COLLEYVILLE HERITAG 0.6 0.0 1 .2 1.0 9 1,473 0.6 3.6 COLLEYVILLE MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 o.o 0.0 0 405 0.0 o.o CROSS TIMBER MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 o.o 0.0 0 477 0.0 o.o GRAPEVINE H S 0.2 4.7 3.6 1.4 10 2,019 0.5 2.9 GRAPEVINE MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 o.o 0.0 0 430 0.0 o.o HERITAGE MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 o.o 0.0 0 674 0.0 o.o THE BRIDGES ACAD ALT 2 85 2.4 13.3 VISTA 1 40 2.1 11.9
HURST-EULESS-BE 2.0 2.9 2.5 1.7 191 9,296 2.1 11.7 BEDFORD J H 0.0 0.0 o.o 0.0 0 950 0.0 0.0 BELL H S 2.3 3.9 5.9 4.0 51 2,032 2.5 14.2 CENTRAL J H 0.0 0.0 o.o 0.0 0 1,068 0.0 o.o EULESS J H 2 974 0.2 1 .2
NOTE: A DASH (-) INDICATES DATA ARE NOT REPORTED TO PROTECT STUDENT ANONYMITY.
105
APPENDIX 8 1996·97 CAMPUS DETAIL BY DISTRICT
DROPOUT RATES BY ETHNICITY, ANNUAL DROPOUT RATE, AND ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
COUNTY
TARRANT
TAYLOR
DISTRICT
HURST- EULESS·BE
KELLER ISO
KENNEDALE ISO
LAKE WORTH ISO
MANSFIELD ISO
MASONIC HOME IS
WHITE SETTLEMEN
ABILENE ISO
JIM NED CONS IS
MERKEL ISO
TRENT ISO
WHITE AFR. AM HISP ECON DIS 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 ESTIMATED DROPOUT DROPOUT DROPOUT DROPOUT TOTAL 7-12 DROPOUT LONGITUDINAL
CAMPUS RATE RATE RATE RATE DROPOUTS ENROLLMENT RATE DROPOUT RATE
HARWOOD J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 926 0.0 0.0
HOMEBOUND 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 65 0.0 0.0
HURST J H 0.8 0.0 2.4 1. 7 11 1,077 1. 0 6.0
KEYS CTR 15.2 19.2 5.3 6.9 68 449 15.1 62.7 TRANSITION PROGRAM TRINITY H S
0.0 2.6
0.0 3.4
0.0 3.6
o.o 3.4
0 56
11 2, 106
0.0 2.7
0.0 14.9
1.6 c.o 0.8 1. 1 77 5,440 1.4 8.2
FOSSIL HILL MIDDLE FOSSIL RIDGE H S 2.2 0.0 1.8 o.o
2 24
1, 119 1,243
0.2 1.9
1.1 11.0
KELLER H S 2.1 0.0 1.1 2.6 39 2,014 1.9 11.1 KELLER MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 1,010 0.0 0.0
NEW DIRECTIONS LRN 11.2 0.0 0.0 16.7 12 115 10.4 48.4
3 1 ,063 0.3 1. 7
KENNEDALE H s 3 637 0.5 2.8
KENNEDALE J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 427 0.0 o.o
1.4 4.1 1.3 1.7 12 810 1.5 8.6
LAKE WORTH H S 2.4 6.7 2.4 3.5 12 448 2.7 15.0 N A HOWRY MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 327 0.0 o.o SECOND CHANCE H S 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 45 0.0 o.o
ALTER ED CTR 0.9 3.5
0.8 9.1
1. 1 0.0
0.7 o.o
42 9
4, 747 267
0.9 3.4
5.2 18.6
CROSS TIMBERS INT MANSFIELD H S 1. 1 0.5 1. 5 1. 1 31 2,879 1. 1 6.3
OAK GROVE RESIDENTIA ROGENE WORLEY MIDDLE 2 898 0.2 1. 3
T A HOWARD MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o 0 900 0.0 o.o
0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o 0 62 0.0 o.o MASONIC HOME SCHOOL 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 62 0.0 o.o
2.0 1.8 0.9 0.4 37 2,099 1.8 10.1 BREWER H S 2.1 1.9 1.4 0.9 25 1,307 1.9 10.9 BREWER MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 767 0.0 o.o OASIS ALTER LAN CTR 18.0 33.3 0.0 0.0 12 71 16.9 67 .1
1.7 10.0 1.2 2.4 4.0 2.4 183 8,907 2.1 11. 7
ABILENE H S 1 .9 3.2 5.0 3.6 82 2,815 2.9 16.3 ABILENE STATE SCH 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 32 0.0 o.o ADULT LEARNING CTR 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 15 0.0 o.o CLACK MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 474 0.0 o.o COOPER H S 1. 1 2.0 4.8 3.2 45 2,397 1.9 10.8 EXCEL ALTER H S 6.5 17.1 12.7 8.6 41 428 9.6 45.4 FRANKLIN MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 672 0.0 o.o HOUSTON STUDENT ACH 2 46 4.3 23.4 JEFFERSON MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 501 0.0 o.o LACY SCH 1 20 5.0 26.5 LILLY SMITH FARMER 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 21 0.0 o.o LINCOLN MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 615 0.0 o.o MADISON MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 525 0.0 0.0
MANN MIDDLE 4 596 0. 7 4.0 SCHOOL AGE MOTHERS o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 46 0.0 o.o SP ED HOMEBOUND 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 27 0.0 o.o SPEDOJT 1 21 4.8 25.4 TRAVIS OPPORTUNITY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 43 0.0 o.o WOODSON PROJECT PAS 5.9 0.0 8.1 3.8 7 104 6.7 34.2 WOODSON SKILL CTR 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 15 0.0 o.o
3 462 0.6 3 8 CO·OP ALTEA PROG 1 7 14.3 60 3 JIM NED HS 2 297 0.7 4.0
LAWN EL-MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 160 0.0 o.o
1.0 0.0 0.0 1.3 6 724 0.8 4.9 MERKEL H S 1.5 0.0 0.0 2.4 6 476 1.3 7.3 MERKEL MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 248 0.0 o.o
91 .1 6.4 CO-OP ALTER PROG TRENT SCHOOL
NOTE: A DASH (-) INDICATES DATA ARE NOT REPORTED TO PROTECT STUDENT ANONYMITY.
106
APPENDIX B
1996·97 CAMPUS DETAIL BY DISTRICT
DROPOUT RATES BY ETHNICITY, ANNUAL DROPOUT RATE, AND ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
WHITE AFR. AM HISP ECON DIS 1996·97 1996-97 1996-97 ESTIMATED DROPOUT DROPOUT DROPOUT DROPOUT TOTAL 7-12 DROPOUT LONGITUDINAL
COUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS RATE RATE RATE RATE DROPOUTS ENROLLMENT RATE DROPOUT RATE
TAYLOR WYLIE ISO 0.3 o.o 2.1 o.o 5 1,247 0.4 2.4 WYLIE H s 0.5 o.o 3.2 o.o 5 782 0.6 3.8
WYLIE J H o.o o.o 0.0 0.0 0 465 0.0 0.0
TERRELL 0.0 0.0
TERRELL COUNTY o.o o.o 0.0 0.0 0 118 0.0 0.0 SANDERSON H S 0.0 o.o 0.0 0.0 0 78 0.0 0.0 SANDERSON J H 0.0 o.o o.o o.o 0 40 0.0 0.0
TERRY 2.7 15.3 BROWNFIELD ISO 1.5 o.o 5.1 2.1 41 1J197 3.4 18.9
BROWNFIELD H S 0.7 o.o 4.8 3.5 21 734 2.9 16.0 BROWNFIELD MIDDLE 0.0 o.o o.o 0.0 0 407 0.0 0.0 STUDENT ALTER PROG 35.7 o.o 28.3 12.5 20 76 26.3 84.0
MEADOW ISO 0.0 o.o 0.0 0.0 0 158 0.0 0.0 MEADOW SCHOOL 0.0 o.o 0.0 0.0 0 158 0.0 0.0
UNION ISO 0.0 o.o 0.0 0.0 0 67 0.0 0.0
UNION SCHOOL 0.0 o.o 0.0 o.o 0 67 0.0 0.0
WELLllAN ISO o.o o.o 0.0 o.o 0 95 0.0 o.o WELLMAN SCHOOL 0.0 o.o 0.0 o.o 0 95 0.0 0.0
THROCKMORTON 0.0 0.0
THROCKMORTON IS 0.0 o.o 0.0 o.o 0 110 0.0 0.0 THROCKMORTON EL o.o o.o 0.0 0.0 0 38 0.0 0.0 THROCKMORTON H S 0.0 o.o 0.0 0.0 0 72 0.0 0.0
WOODSON ISO 0.0 o.o 0.0 o.o 0 65 0.0 0.0 WOODSON SCHOOL 0.0 o.o 0.0 0.0 0 65 0.0 0.0
TITUS 1. 3 7.3
CHAPEL HILL ISO 0.0 o.o o.o 0.0 0 277 0.0 0.0
CHAPEL HILL H S o.o o.o 0.0 0.0 0 159 0.0 0.0
CHAPEL HILL J H 0.0 o.o 0.0 0.0 0 118 0.0 0.0
HARTS BLUFF ISO 0.0 o.o 0.0 o.o 0 90 0.0 0.0 HARTS BLUFF EL 0.0 o.o 0.0 0.0 0 90 0.0 0.0
MOUNT PLEASANT 1.3 1.4 1.9 1. 3 29 2,006 1.4 8.4 ALTER ED 0.0 o.o 0.0 0.0 0 57 o.o 0.0
MT PLEASANT H s 1. 8 2.2 3.2 2.3 29 1,343 2.2 12.3 WALLACE J H o.o o.o 0.0 0.0 0 661 0.0 0.0
WINFIELD ISO 31 3.2 17.9 WINFIELD EL 31 3.2 17.9
TOM GREEN 2.0 11.4 CHRISTOVAL ISO 0.0 o.o 0.0 0.0 0 186 0.0 0.0
c 8 p CHRISTOVAL H S 0.0 o.o o.o 0.0 0 181 0.0 0.0 GRAPE CREEK SPECIAL MILES voe TRAINING (
GRAPE CREEK ISO 317 0.3 1.9 c 8 p FAIRVIEW ACCELERATE 0.0 o.o 0.0 0.0 0 22 0.0 0.0 GRAPE CREEK H S 1 98 1. 0 6.0 GRAPE CREEK MIDDLE 0.0 o.o 0.0 0.0 0 210 0.0 0.0 WATER VALLEY voe TRA
SAN ANGELO ISO 0.9 2.9 3.9 2.7 191 8,467 2.3 12.8 CARVER ALTER LRN CT 11.9 12.5 10.3 9.1 28 258 10.9 49.8 CENTRAL H S 0.9 3.1 7.2 7.1 94 2,727 3.4 19.0 EDISON J H 0.8 1.3 0.8 0.9 9 1,134 0.8 4 .7 GLENN J H o.o o.o 0.0 0.0 0 1,309 0.0 0.0 LAKE VIEW H S 1.7 3.4 4.0 2.8 34 1,315 2.6 14.5 LEE J H LINCOLN J H
o.o o.o 0.0 o.o 0 1
1,246 658
0.0 o.2
0.0 0.9
PAYS ALTER SCH 5.9 18.8 12.1 11.8 25 259 9.7 45.6
VERIBEST ISO o.o o.o 0.0 o.o 0 75 0.0 0.0 VERIBEST EL o.o o.o 0.0 o.o 0 45 0.0 0.0
NOTE: A DASH (·) INDICATES DATA ARE NOT REPORTED TO PROTECT STUDENT ANONYMITY.
107
APPENDIX B 1996-97 CAMPUS DETAIL BY DISTRICT
DROPOUT RATES BY ETHNICITY, ANNUAL DROPOUT RATE, AND ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
COUNTY
TOM GREEN
TRAVIS
OISTRICT
VER I BEST ISO
WALL ISO
WATER VALLEY IS
AMERICAN INSTIT
AUSTIN ISO
DEL VALLE ISO
EANES ISO
LAGO VISTA ISO
LAKE TRAVIS ISO
MANOR ISO
WHITE AFR. AM HISP ECON DIS 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 ESTIMATED DROPOUT DROPOUT DROPOUT DROPOUT TOTAL 7-12 DROPOUT LONGITUDINAL
CAMPUS RATE RATE RATE RATE DROPOUTS ENROLLMENT RATE DROPOUT RATE
VERIBEST H s a.a a.a a.a a.a a 30 a.a a.o
1 45a a.2 1. 3 FAIRVIEW ACCELERATE a.a a.a a.a a.a a 25 a.a a.a GRAPE CREEK SPECIAL MILES voe TRAINING ( WALL H S 1 263 a 4 2 3 WALL MIDDLE a.a a.a a.a a.a a 162 a a a a
a.a a.a a.a a.a a 241 a a a.a FAIRVIEW ACCELERATE a.a a.a a.a a.a a 26 a.a a.a WATER VALLEY H S a.a a.a a.a a.a a 228 a.a a.a
1.7 9.8 17.0 39.1 25.2 35.9 56 212 26.4 84.1
AMERICAN INSTITUTE 17.0 39.1 25.2 35.9 56 212 26.4 84 .1
a.s 2.4 2.5 1 .9 579 32,450 1.8 10.2 ACCfROBBINS ACAD 17.6 25.0 10.4 20.0 36 176 20.5 74.7 ANDERSON H S a. 2 1.9 1.1 a.7 11 1,923 a.6 3.4 AUSTIN H S a.8 3.2 3.4 2.6 52 2,563 2.a 11 .6 AUSTIN ST HOSPITAL 2 124 1.6 9.3 BAILEY MIDDLE a.a a.a a.a a.a a 1 ,217 a.a a.a BEOICHEK MIDDLE 832 a.1 a.7 BOWIE H S a.3 a.5 1.3 1. 7 16 2,955 a.5 3.2 BURNET MIDDLE 2 835 0.2 1. 4 COVINGTON MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 910 o.o 0.0 CROCKETT H S 2.0 2.9 3.6 3.2 70 2,467 2.8 15.9 DOBIE MIDDLE 0.0 0.6 1.2 0.6 5 717 a.7 4.1 FULMORE MIDDLE 0.8 0.0 0.9 0.6 6 762 0.8 4.6 HOMEBOUND 3 199 1. 5 8.7 HUSTON-TILLOTSON GE 13.3 18.3 19.5 23.5 41 255 16.1 65.1 JERRY CLIFTON CTR 7 14.3 60.3 JOHNSON H S 1.6 3.5 4.3 4.2 47 1 ,505 3.1 17.3 JOHNSTON H S 2.3 2.9 3.1 2.3 59 2,057 2.9 16.0 KEALING J H 0.5 0.7 1.6 1. 7 9 1,092 0.8 4.8 LAMAR MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 742 0.0 o.o LANIER H S 1.8 1.2 2.4 1. 1 34 1,864 1.8 10.5 MARTIN J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 537 0.0 o.o MCCALLUM H S 1.3 3.5 5.2 2.9 44 1, 722 2.6 14.4 MENDEZ MIDDLE 2.0 1.4 3. 7 2.2 28 934 3.0 16.7 MURCH ISON MIDDLE 2 860 0.2 1.4 0 HENRY MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 2.3 1.6 7 724 1. 0 5.7 PEARCE MIDDLE 0.0 0.2 3.1 1.4 12 795 1 .5 8.7 PORTER MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 1.6 1.5 8 906 0.9 5.2 RAYS SCH 0.0 23.1 10.9 22.2 14 98 14.3 60.3 REAGAN H S 0.5 1 .4 4.3 2.6 42 1 J 725 2.4 13.8 ROSEDALE 0.0 0.0 a.o a.a a 73 a.a a.a SPECIAL PLACEMENT C a.a a.a a.a a a a 308 o.a a.a TRAVIS H S 1.3 a.5 1.a 1 .o 20 1,993 1.a 5.9 WEBB MIDDLE o.a 1.9 1.3 a.7 7 558 1.3 7.3
1.a a.9 1.7 1.a 31 2,351 1 .3 7.7 DEL VALLE H S 1. 7 1.6 3.a 2.1 31 1,306 2 4 13.4 DEL VALLE J H a.a a.a a a o.a 0 945 a a o.o DEL VALLE OPPORTUNI a.a a.a a a a.o 0 183 a a a.o
2 3,306 a.1 0.4 HILL COUNTRY MIDDLE o.a a.a a.a o.a a 638 a.a a.a WEST RIDGE MIDDLE o.a a.a a.a o.a a 585 a.a a.a WESTLAKE H S 2 2,086 a.1 a.6
1 354 a.3 1 ..7 LAGO VISTA H S 1 23a 0.4 2.6 LAGO VISTA MIDDLE a a o.a 0.0 a.a a 124 o.a a.a
a.8 100.0 5.3 2.2 18 1,421 1. 3 7.4 LAKE TRAVIS H S 1. 1 100.0 8.9 4.1 17 878 1. 9 11.1 LAKE TRAVIS MIDDLE 1 549 a.2 1.1
1.2 1 .3 2.8 1.7 19 1J046 1. 8 10.4 EXCELL LRN CTR 11.1 50.0 13.0 15.8 7 45 15.6 63.7 MANOR H S a.4 a.7 1.4 a.5 5 618 a.8 4.8 MANOR J H 1 .3 a.a 3.2 1 .3 7 398 1.8 10.1
NOTE: A DASH (-) INDICATES DATA ARE NOT REPORTED TO PROTECT STUDENT ANONYMITY.
108
APPENDIX B 1996-97 CAMPUS DETAIL BY DISTRICT
DROPOUT RATES BY ETHNICITY, ANNUAL DROPOUT RATE, AND ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
COUNTY
TRAVIS
TRINITY
TYLER
UPSHUR
DISTillCT
PFLUGERVILLE IS
APPLE SPRINGS I
CENTERVILLE ISO
GROVETON !SD
TRINITY ISO
CHESTER ISO
COLMESNEIL ISO
SPURGER ISO
WARREN ISO
WOODVILLE ISO
BIG SANDY ISO
GILMER ISO
HARMONY ISO
NEW DIANA ISO
ORE CITY ISO
UNION GROVE ISO
CAMPUS
WHITE DROPOUT
RATE
AFR. AM DROPOUT
RATE
HISP DROPOUT
RATE
ECON DIS DROPOUT
RATE
1996-97 TOTAL
DROPOUTS
1996-97 7-12
ENROLLMENT
1996-97 DROPOUT
RATE
ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
ALTER LEARNING CTR ALTER LEARNING MIOO JOHN B CONNALLY H S PARK CREST MIDDLE PFLUGERVILLE H S PFLUGERVILLE MIDDLE WESTVIEW MIDDLE
1.1 0.0 0.0 0.6
1.9
1.2 0.0 0.0 2.2
1.4
2.7 o.o 0.0 3.1
4.8
1. 7 o.o 0.0 2.0
3.1
70 0 0
11 1
53 4 1
4,933 150
27 716 561
2,283 616 765
1.4 0.0 0.0 1.5 0.2 2.3 0.6 0.1
8.2 0.0 0.0 8.9 1. 1
13.2 3.8 0.8
APPLE SPRINGS H S BOYS WILDERNESS SCH
0.0 o.o 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
0 0 0
142 104
38
2.1 0.0 0.0 0.0
12.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
BOYS WILDERNESS HOS CENTERVILLE H S
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4 0 4
126 38 88
3.2 o.o 4.5
17.6 0.0
24.4
GROVETON J H-H S WILDERNESS HOPE CTR
1.4 1.6 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.8 0.8 0.0
5 5 0
435 378
57
1.1 1.3 o.o
6.7 7 .7 0.0
TRINITY EVENING H s TRINITY H S TRINITY J H
3.3
4.1 0.0
2.0
3.1 o.o
2.1
4.2 0.0
1.1
1.3 0.0
20 4
16 0
689 35
417 262
2.9 11.4 3.8 0.0
16.2 51. 7 20.9 0.0
CHESTER H S 129 129
1.3 0.8 0.8
7.3 4.6 4.6
COLMESNEIL H S COLMESNEIL MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
3 3 0
264 168
96
1.1 1.8 0.0
6.6 10,3 0.0
SPURGER H S 2 2
224 224
0.9 0.9
5.2 5.2
WARREN H s WARREN J H
1.1 1.6 0.0
0.0 0.0 o.o
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.7 1.2 0.0
6 6 0
573 386 187
1.0 1.6 0.0
6.1 9.0 0.0
WOODVILLE H S WOODVILLE MIDDLE
1.7 2.6 0.0
1. 7 2.5 o.o
0.0 0.0 0.0
1.6 2.7 0.0
13 13
0
824 531 293
1.6 2.4 0.0
9.1 13.8 0.0
BIG SANDY H s BIG SANDY J H
4.5 7 .1 0.0
1.5 2.3 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
2.6 4.5 o.o
14 14
0
369 236 133
1.8 3.8 5.9 o.o
10,5 20, 7 30.7 0.0
GILMER H s GILMER J H
1.1 1.8 0.0
1.8 2.6 0.0
5.4 8.3 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
17 17
0
1,232 805 427
1.4 2.1 0.0
8.0 12.0 0.0
HARMONY H S HARMONY MIDDLE
1.3 1.9 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
o.8 1.3 0.0
5 5 0
423 274 149
1.2 1.8 0.0
6.9 10.5 0.0
NEW DIANA H S NEW DIANA MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
3 3 0
424 283 141
0.7 1.1 0.0
4.2 6.2 o.o.
ORE CITY H S ORE CITY MIDDLE
2.2 3.4 o.o
0.0 0.0 o.o
6.3 12.5 0.0
1.9 3.5 o.o
9 9 0
433 280 154
2.1 3.2 0.0
11.8 17.8 o.o
UNION GROVE H S 3.4 3.4
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
2.1 2.1
12 12
360 360
3.3 3.3
18.4 18.4
NOTE: A DASH (-) INDICATES DATA ARE NOT REPORTED TO PROTECT STUDENT ANONYMITY.
109
APPENDIX B 1996-97 CAMPUS DETAIL BY DISTRICT
DROPOUT RATES BY ETHNICITY, ANNUAL DROPOUT RATE, AND ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
COUNTY
UPSHUR
UPTON
UVALDE
VAL VERDE
VAN ZANDT
DISTRICT
UNION HILL !SD
MCCAMEY ISO
RANKIN ISO
KNIPPA ISO
SABINAL ISO
UTOPIA ISO
UVALDE CONS ISO
COMSTOCK ISO
SAN FELIPE-DEL
CANTON ISO
EDGEWOOD ISO
FRUITVALE ISO
GRAND SALINE IS
MARTINS MILL IS
VAN ISO
WILLS POINT ISO
CAMPUS
WHITE DROPOUT
RATE
AFR. AM DROPOUT
RATE
HISP DROPOUT
RATE
ECON DIS DROPOUT
RATE
1996-97 TOTAL
DROPOUTS
1996-97 7-12
ENROLLMENT
1996-97 DROPOUT
RATE
ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RA TE
UNION HILL H S 143 143
D.7 0.7
4.1 4.1
MCCAMEY H S MCCAMEY MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o
3 3 0
350 231 119
0.9 0.9 1.3 0.0
5.3 5.0 7.5 0.0
RANKIN H S 2 2
201 201
1.0 1.0
5 a 5.8
KNIPPA ALTERNATIVE KNIPPA SCHOOL
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 0 1
188 72
116
2.9 0.5 0.0 0.9
15.9 3.2 0.0 5.1
SABINAL H S SABINAL J H
2.0 3.1 0.0
0 0 0 0 0.0
2.0 3.2 0.0
2.0 3.6 0.0
5 5 0
247 160
87
2.0 3.1 o.o
11.6 17 .3 0.0
UTOPIA SCHOOL 79 79
1.3 1.3
7.4 7.4
BATESVILLE MIDDLE EXCEL ACADEMY UVALDE H S UVALDE J H
1 .o 0.0 2.9 1.2
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
3.9 0.0
20.2 3.3
2.4 o.o 12.0 2.7
80 0
37 42
1
2,547 66
213 1,550
807
3.1 0.0
17.4 2.7 0.1
17.4 0.0
68.2 15.2 0.7
COMSTOCK SCHOOL 0.0 0.0
0 0 0 0
0.0 0.0
o.o o.o
0 0
76 76
1 .3 0 0 0 0
7.8 0.0 0.0
DELRIO HS DEL RIO MIDDLE DEL RIO 9TH GRADE FERMIN CALDERON EL MEMORIAL MIDDLE SAN FELIPE MIDDLE
0.4 0.9
0.0 0.0 o.o 0.0
0 0 0 0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
1.6 2.9
0.8 0.0 o.o 0.0
1 .2 2.4
a.a 0.0 o.o 0.0
65 57
2 6 0 0 0
4,757 2,254
805 890
11 12
789
1.4 2.5 0.2 0.7 0.0 0.0 o.o
7.9 14.3 1.5 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
CANTON H S CANTON J H VAN ZANDT-RAINS CO
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0 0 0 0
860 531 325
5
0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EDGEWOOD H S EDGEWOOD MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o
2 2 0
440 292 148
0.5 0. 7 0.0
2 7 4 0 0.0
FRUITVALE H S 148 148
0.7 0.7
4.0 4.0
GRAND SALINE H S GRANO SALINE MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o
3 3 0
470 279 191
0.6 1. 1 0.0
3 a 6 3 0 0
MARTINS MILL H s SUNDOWN RANCH 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o 0
294 175 119
0.3 0.6 0.0
2 0 3.4 0.0
VAN H s VAN J H
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
o.o 0.0 0.0
0 0 0
1 ,007 672 336
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
WILLS WILLS
POINT H S POINT MIDDLE
0.7 1.1 0.0
1. 1 2.0 0.0
3.4 5.8 0.0
0.5 1.0 o.o
11 11
0
1,236 754 482
0.9 1.5 0.0
5.2 8.4 0.0
NOTE; A DASH (-) INDICATES DATA ARE NOT REPORTED TO PROTECT STUDENT ANONYMITY.
110
APPENDIX B 1996-97 CAMPUS DETAIL BY DISTRICT
DROPOUT RATES BY ETHNICITY, ANNUAL DROPOUT RATE, AND. ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
COUNTY
VICTORIA
WALKER
WALLER
WARD
WASHINGTON
WEBB
DISTRICT
BLOOMINGTON ISO
VICTORIA ISO
HUNTSVILLE ISD
NEW WAVERLY ISD
HEMPSTEAD ISO
ROYAL ISD
WALLER ISO
GRANDFALLS-ROYA
MONAHANS-WICKET
BRENHAM ISO
BURTON ISO
LAREDO ISO
MIRANDO CITY IS
CAMPUS
WHITE DROPOUT
RATE
AFR. AM DROPOUT
RATE
HISP DROPOUT
RATE
ECON DIS ORO POUT
RATE
1996-97 TOTAL
DROPOUTS
1996-97 7-12
ENROLLMENT
1996-97 DROPOUT
RATE
ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT.RATE
BLOOMINGTON H S 4 4
485 485
1.6 0.8 0.8
9.1 4.9 4.9
BROWNSON CHILDRENS CRAIN MIDDLE HOWELL MIDDLE PATTI WELDER MIDDLE PROFIT ACADEMIC CTR STROMAN H S VICTORIA H S YOUTH HOME
0.9 o.o o.o 0.0
6.3 1.9 0.9 0.0
1.1 0.0 o.o 0.0
0.0 1.5 2.0 o.o
2.4 o.o o.o o.o
6.1 3.5 3.4 o.o
1. 7 0.0 0.0 0.0
4.4 2.4 3.2 o.o
114 0 0 0 2
13 53 46
0
7,010 78
845 789 849 221
t ,919 2,506
32
1.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 5.9 2.8 1.8 0.0
9.4 o.o 0.0 0.0 1.4
30.5 15.5 10.5 o.o
BAYES ACHIEVEMENT C CHALLENGE PROGRAM HUNTSVILLE H S MANCE PARK MIDDLE
0.8 o.o 0.0 1.3
1.1 o.o 0.0 2.0
2.1 o.o o.o 3.4
0.0 0.0 o.o o.o
34 0 0
33 1
3,158 28
280 1,905 1,090
1.1 1.1 o.o 0.0 1.7 0.1
6.2 6.3 0.0 o.o
10.0 0.6
GULF COAST TRADES C NEW WAVERLY H S NEW WAVERLY MIDDLE
0.0
0.0
0.0
o.o
o.o
o.o
o.o
0.0
3 0 3 0
351 522 229 122
0.9 0.0 1. 3 0.0
5.0 0.0 7.6 0.0
HEMPSTEAD H S HEMPSTEAD J H
0.0 0.0 0.0
1.6 2.5 o.o
0.7 1.2 o.o
0.4 0.7 0.0
5 5 0
620 400 220
1.3 0.8 1.3 0.0
7.8 4. 7 7.3 0.0
ROYAL H S ROYAL MIDDLE
2.1 3.3 o.o
0.8 1.4 0.0
1.0 2.4 o.o
1.2 2.5 0.0
8 8 0
633 351 282
1.3 2.3 0.0
7.4 12.9 0.0
H T JONES INT WALLER H S WAYNE C SCHULTZ MIDD
1.2
2.0
1.8
2.7
2.2
4.4
0.9
1.8
27
27
1J747
1,073
1.5
2.5
8.9
14.2
GRANDFALLS-ROYALTY H GRANDFALLS-ROYALTY 0.0 0.0 o.o 0.0
3 3 0
106 76 30
2.1 2.8 3.9 0.0
12.2 15.8 21.5 0.0
MONAHANS H s WALKER J H
1.8 2.7 o.o
1.9 3.0 0.0
2.4 3.8 o.o
0.7 1.4 0.0
26 26
0
1 ,253 810 443
2.1 3.2 0.0
11.8 17 .8 0.0
1.1 6.6
BRENHAM AlTER BRENHAM H S BRENHAM MIDDLE BRENHAM STATE SCH
0.3 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0
2.5 0.0 4.3 0.0 0.0
3.2 o.o 5.6 o.o o.o
2.4 0.0 4.5 0.0 0.0
26 0
26 0 0
2,379 142
1,483 836
10
1. 1 0.0 1.8 0.0 0.0
6.4 0.0
10 .1 0.0 0.0
BURTON H S 3 3
193 193
1.6 1.6
9.0 9.0
1
CHRISTEN MIDDLE OR LEO CIGARROA H S EVENING ALTER ED PR JOAQUIN CIGARROA MI LAMAR MIDDLE MARTIN H S MEMORIAL MIDDLE NIXON H S
1.0 0.0 4.3 12.5 0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0
0.0
3.3 1.0 3.9 15.4 1.6
4.7
2.8
2.1 1.0 2.4 2.9 1.4
3.1
2.5
330 11 66 47 14
3 118
2 69
10, 104 1,098 1,699
306 905 927
2,554 473
2,568
2.2 3.3 1.0 3.9
15.4 1.5 0.3 4.6 0.4 2.7
12.4 18.1 5.9
21.2 63.2 8.9 1.9
24.7 2.5
15.1
MIRANDO EL o.o 0.0
0.0 o.o
o.o o.o
0.0 0.0
0 0
9 9
0.0 0.0
o.o 0.0
NOTE: A DASH (-) INDICATES DATA ARE NOT REPORTED TO PROTECT STUDENT ANONYMITY.
11 l
APPENDIX B 1996-97 CAMPUS DETAIL BY DISTRICT
DROPOUT RATES BY ETHNICITY, ANNUAL DROPOUT RATE, AND ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
COUNTY
WEBB
WHARTON
WHEELER
WICHITA
DISTRICT
UNITED ISO
WEBB CONS ISO
BOLING ISO
EAST BERNARD IS
EL CAMPO ISO
LOUISE ISO
WHARTON ISO
ALLISON ISO
FORT ELLIOTT CO
SHAMROCK ISO
WHEELER ISO
BURKBURNETT ISO
CITY VIEW ISO
ELECTRA ISO
IOWA PARK CONS
CAMPUS
WHITE ORO POUT
RATE
AFR. AM DROPOUT
RATE
HISP DROPOUT
RATE
ECON DIS DROPOUT
RATE
1996-97 TOTAL
DROPOUTS
1996-97 7-12
ENROLLMENT
1996-97 DROPOUT
RATE
ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
ALTEA CAMPUS CLARK MIDDLE GEORGE WASHINGTON A GEORGE WASHINGTON MI JOHN B ALEXANDER H LOS O'BIPOS MIDDLE SALVADOR GARCIA ALT SALVADOR GARCIA MIDD SCHOOL FOR ACCELERA TRAUTMANN MIDDLE UNITED H S UNITED MIDDLE UNITED SOUTH H S UNITED SOUTH J H
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.3 1. 1 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 2.7 0.0
0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.3 0.5 0.0
0.0 0.0 1. 0 0.0 2.4 0.0
81 0 0 0 2 5 5 0 1 0 0
11 0
57 0
8,924 114 539
36 502
1,810 466 103 504
20 420
1, 739 455
2, 140 529
0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.3 1. 1 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 2.7 0.0
5.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.4 1. 6 6.3 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.0 3. 7 0.0
15.0 0.0
BRUNI BRUNI
H S MIDDLE o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0
2 2 0
200 139
61
1.0 1. 4 0.0
5.9 8.3 0.0
BOLING H S IAGO J H
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
0 0 0
521 348 173
1. 2 0.0 0.0 0.0
6.8 0.0 0.0 0.0
EAST BERNARD H S EAST BERNARD J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
3 3 0
446 290 156
0.7 1.0 0.0
4.0 6.1 0.0
EL CAMPO H S EL CAMPO MIDDLE
0.4 0.5 0.0
2.4 3.3 1.0
2.8 3.6 1.5
2.3 3.4 1.1
30 25
5
1,851 1,218
635
1. 6 2.1 0.8
9.3 11. 7 4.6
LOUISE H S 3 3
253 253
1.2 1.2
6.9 6.9
C G SIVELLS EL WHARTON H S WHARTON J H
0.2
0.3
2.1
3.5
1.1
1.4
1.5
2.7
15
14
1,369
865
1.1
1. 6
6.4
9.3
ALLISON SCHOOL 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0 0
39 39
1.4 0.0 0.0
7.9 0.0 0.0
FORT ELLIOTT SCHOOL 2 2
65 65
3.1 3.1
17 .1 17 .1
SHAMROCK SCHOOL 2 2
216 216
0.9 0.9
5.4 5.4
WHEELER SCHOOL 3 3
191 191
1. 6 1.6
9.1 9.1
ALTER ED CTR BURKBURNETT H s BURKBURNETT J H
1.4 10.7 1. 4 0.0
0.6 0.0 0.8 0.0
2.9 0.0 4.6 0.0
1.9 6.9 2.7 0.0
25 8
17 0
1,850 95
1, 158 669
1.0 1 .4 8.4 1.5 0.0
5.8 7. 8
41. 0 8.5 0.0
CITY VIEW EL 2 2
189 189
1. 1 1. 1
6.2 6.2
ELECTRA H s ELECTRA J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
3 3 0
346 223 123
0 9 1 .3 0 0
5.1 7.8 0.0
IOWA PARK H s IOWA PARK J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
3 3 0
1, 103 702 401
0.3 0.4 0.0
1. 6 2.5 0.0
NOTE: A DASH (-) INDICATES DATA ARE NOT REPORTED TO PROTECT STUDENT ANONYMITY.
112
APPENDIX B
1996-97 CAMPUS DETAIL BY DISTRICT
DROPOUT RATES BY ETHNICITY, ANNUAL DROPOUT RATE 1 AND ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
WHITE AFR. AM HISP ECON DIS 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 ESTIMATED DROPOUT DROPOUT DROPOUT DROPOUT TOTAL 7-12 DROPOUT LONGITUDINAL
COUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS RATE RATE RATE RATE DROPOUTS ENROLLMENT RATE DROPOUT RATE
WICHITA WICHITA FALLS 0.8 1.8 1.3 1.1 73 7 ,271 1.0 5.9 BARWISE J' H 1 691 0.1 0.9 CUNNINGHAM SCHOOL o.o 0.0 o.o 0.0 0 14 o.o o.o HARRELL GTR 4.1 8.5 4.0 6.3 20 409 4.9 26.0 HIRSCHI H S 3.3 1.6 2.8 1.5 26 1,049 2.5 14.0 HOLLAND CTR 3 102 2.9 16.4 KIREiY MATH-SGIENGE o.o 0.0 o.o 0.0 0 596 0.0 o.o MCNIEL J H o.o o.o 0.0 0.0 0 599 0.0 o.o RIDER H S 1 1,904 0.1 0.3 WICHITA FALLS H S 1.0 3.0 0.6 1.4 17 1,511 1.1 6.6 WICHITA FALLS SP ED o.o 0.0 o.o 0.0 0 178 o.o 0.0 ZUNDELOWITZ J H 0.3 0.0 2.1 0.5 5 654 o.8 4.5
WILBARGER HARROLD ISO
, 78
0.9 1.3
5.5 7.5
HARROLD. SCHOOL 78 1.3 7.5
NORTHSIOE ISO o.o 0.0 0.0 o.o 0 83 0.0 o.o (
NORTHSIDE SCHOOL o.o 0.0 0.0 o·.o 0 83 0.0 o.o
VERNON ISO 1.0 1.2 0.8 0.5 14 1,455 1.0 5.6 VERNON H S 1. 8 2.6 1.8 1.2 14 737 1.9 10.9 VERNON INT o.o 0.0 0.0 o.o 0 479 0.0 o.o VERNON STATE HOSPIT o.o o.o 0.0 0.0 0 241 0.0 o.o
WILLACY 2.5 14.2 LASARA ISO 2 62 3.2 17.9
LASARA El 2 62 3.2 17 .9
LYFORD CISD o.o o.o 1. 1 0.6 9 895 1.0 5.9 LYFORD H S o.o 0.0 1.6 1.0 9 603 1. 5 8.6 LYFORD J H o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 292 0.0 o.o
RAYMONDVILLE IS 1. 1 0.0 3.8 2.7 50 1,383 3.6 19.8 MYRA GREEN J H 3 507 0.6 3 .5 RAYMONDVILLE H s 1.6 o.o 4.1 3.6 33 850 3.9 21.1 RAYMONDVILLE INSTRU o.o 0.0 21.2 12.1 14 67 20.9 75.5
SAN PERLITA ISO 1 154 0.6 3.8 SAN PERLITA H S 1 106 0.9 5.5 SAN PERLITA MIDDLE o.o o.o 0.0 0.0 0 48 0.0 o.o
WILLIAMSON 0.6 3.8 COUPLAND ISO o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 18 0.0 o.o
COUPLAND EL o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 18 0.0 o.o
FLORENCE !SD 4 420 1.0 5.6 FLORENCE H S 4 260 1.4 8.3 FLORENCE MIDDLE o.o o.o 0.0 0.0 0 140 0.0 o.o
GEORGETOWN ISO 0.6 3.6 1.8 0.9 30 3,368 0.9 5.2 GHIP RIGHARTE LAN G 9_,9 50.0 o.o 5.0 8 95 8.4 41.0 DOUGLAS BENOLD MIDD o.o o.o 0.0 0.0 0 599 0.0 o.o GEORGETOWN ALTER PR o.o o.o 0.0 0.0 0 22 0.0 o.o GEORGETOWN H S 0.4 5.2 3.1 1.4 21 2,007 1.0 6.1 JAMES TIPPIT MIDDLE o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 581 o.o o.o SOUTHWIND BOYS HOME 1 24 4.2 22.5 WILLIAMSON GO J J A o.o 0.0 o.o 0.0 0 22 0.0 o.o WM S LOTT JUVENILE o.o 0.0 o.o 0.0 0 118 0.0 o.o
GRANGER ISO o.o o.o 0.0 o.o 0 214 0.0 o.o GRANGER SCHOOL o.o 0.0 o.o 0.0 0 214 0.0 o.o
HUTTO ISO 389 0.3 1.5 HUTTO H S 389 0.3 1.5
JARRELL ISO 1 282 0.4 2.1 JARRELL H S 1 171 0.6 3.5 JARRELL MIDDLE o.o 0.0 0.0 o.o 0 111 o.o o.o
NOTE: A DASH (-) INDICATES DATA ARE NOT REPORTED TO PROTECT STUDENT ANONYMITY.
113
APPENDIX B 1996-97 CAMPUS DETAIL BY DISTRICT
DROPOUT RATES BY ETHNICITY, ANNUAL DROPOUT RATE, ANO ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
COUNTY
WILLIAMSON
WILSON
WINKLER
WISE
DISTRICT
LEANDER ISO
LIBERTY HILL IS
ROUND ROCK ISO
TAYLOR ISO
THRALL ISO
FLORESVILLE ISO
LA VERNIA ISO
POTH ISO
STOCKDALE ISO
KERMIT ISO
WINK-LOVING ISO
ALVORD ISO
BOYD ISO
BRIDGEPORT ISO
WHITE AFR. AM HISP ECON DIS 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 ESTIMATED DROPOUT DROPOUT DROPOUT DROPOUT TOTAL 7-12 DROPOUT LONGITUDINAL
CAMPUS RATE RATE RATE RATE DROPOUTS ENROLLMENT RATE DROPOUT RATE
1 .0 0.8 2.3 1.4 47 4, 186 1.1 6.6
CEDAR PARK MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 756 0.0 0.0
LEANDER H S 1.5 1. 3 3.9 2.5 47 2,640 1 .8 10.2 LEANDER MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 803 0.0 0.0
2 697 0.3 1. 7
LIBERTY HILL H S 2 362 0.6 3.3
LIBERTY HILL MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 198 0.0 0.0
WESlWOOD SP ED 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 98 0.0 0.0
WINORIDGE SP ED 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 65 0.0 0.0
0.3 0.5 0.7 0.3 43 12,393 0.3 2.1
C D fULKES MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 528 0.0 0.0
CANYON VISTA MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 767 0.0 0.0
CEDAR VALLEY MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 658 0.0 0.0
CHISHOLM TRAIL MIDDL 1 659 0.2 0.9
DEERPARK MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 889 0.0 0.0
ESPERANZA TREATMENT 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 31 0.0 0.0
HOPEWELL MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 596 0.0 0.0
MCNEIL H S 0.3 0.0 0.9 0.0 7 2, 102 0.3 2.0
NOEL GRISHAM MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 463 0.0 0.0
ROUND ROCK H S 0.7 1. 1 1.4 0.8 30 3,441 0.9 5.1
ROUND ROCK OPPORT C 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 504 0.0 0.0
WESTWOOD H S 0.2 1.2 0.0 0.5 5 2,239 0.2 1. 3
TAYLOR H S 0.5 0.7
1. 4 2 .2
2.3 3.9
1.4 2.8
16 16
1 ,273 813
1.3 2.0
7.3 11.2
TAYLOR MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 462 0.0 0.0
3 262 1.1 6.7
THRALL H S 3 262 1. 1 6.7
1 .9 11.0 1. 7 3.3 3.7 3.1 43 1 ,560 2 8 15.4
FLORESVILLE ALTER CT 3 110 2 7 15.3 FLORESVILLE H S 2.0 9.1 5.8 5.6 38 955 4.0 21. 6 FLORESVILLE MIDDLE 2 594 0.3 2.0
0.4 0.0 4,8 1. 8 9 926 1.0 5.7
LA VERNIA ALTER 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 14 0.0 0.0
LA VERNIA H S 0.6 0.0 7.3 3.4 9 594 1.5 8.8
LA VERNIA MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 332 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 4.3 2.1 8 408 2.0 11.2 POTH AL TEA POTH H S 0.0 0.0 7.1 3.8 8 256 3.1 17.3 POTH J H
3 389 0.8 4.5
STOCKDALE H s 3 261 1.1 6.7
STOCKDALE J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 128 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 773 0.0 0.0
KERMIT H s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 488 0.0 0.0
KERMIT J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 287 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 202 0.0 0.0 WINK H S o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 202 0.0 0.0
0.9 5.3 1 249 0.4 2.4
ALVORD H s 1 162 0.6 3.7
ALVORD J H 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 87 0.0 0.0
1.3 0.0 3.0 2.5 8 575 1.4 8.1 BOYD H S 2.1 0.0 6.3 4.8 8 361 2.2 12.6 BOYD MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 214 0.0 0.0
0.6 0.0 0.5 0.4 6 985 0.6 3.6 BR IOGEPORT H S 1.0 0.0 0.8 0.8 6 631 1.0 5.6
NOTE: A DASH {-) INDICATES DATA ARE NOT REPORTED TO PROTECT STUDENT ANONYMITY.
114
APPENDIX B
1996-97 CAMPUS DETAIL BY DISTRICT
DROPOUT RATES BY ETHNICITY, ANNUAL DROPOUT RATE, AND ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
COUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS
WHITE ORO POUT
RATE
AFR. AM DROPOUT
RATE
HISP DROPOUT
RATE
ECON OIS DROPOUT
RATE
1996-97 TOTAL
DROPOUTS
1996-97 7-12
ENROLLMENT
1996-97 DROPOUT
RATE
ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
WISE BRIDGEPORT !SD BRIDGEPORT MIDDLE 0.0 0.0 o.o 0.0 0 354 0.0 0.0
CHICO ISO CHICO H S CHICO MIDDLE 0.0 o.o 0.0 0.0
2 2 0
288 190
98
0.7 1. 1 0.0
4.1 6.2 0.0
DECATUR ISO DECATUR DECATUR DECATUR
H S INT MIDDLE
0.6 1.1 0.0 0.0
3.6 4.8 0.0 0.0
2.2 4.0 0.0 0.0
2.0 4.1 0.0 0.0
10 10
0 0
990 590
16 386
1.0 1.7 0.0 0.0
5.9 9.8 0.0 0.0
PARADISE ISO PARADISE H S PARADISE MIDDLE S T A C
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
4 2 0 2
373 242 121
31
1. 1 0.8 0.0 6.5
6.3 4.9 0.0
33.0
SLIDELL ISO SLIDELL SCHOOL
138 138
0.7 0 .7
4.3 4.3
WOOD ALBA-GOLDEN ISO
ALBA-GOLDEN H S AlTEA SCHOOL
4 1 3
373 371
13
0.7 1. 1 0.3
23.1
3.9 6.3 1. 6
79.3
HAWKINS ISO HAWKINS H S HAWKINS MIDDLE LAKE COUNTRY ALTER
1.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.5
0.0
5 3 0 2
445 295 140
28
1. 1 1.0 0.0 7 .1
6.6 6.0 0.0
35.9
MINEOLA ISO MINEOLA H S MINEOLA MIDDLE
0.5 0.9 0.0
1.9 3.1 0.0
3.9 6.7 o.o
2.0 3.7 0.0
7 7 0
721 440 281
1.0 1.6 0.0
5.7 9.2 0.0
QUITMAN ISO QUITMAN H S QUITMAN J H SALESMANSHIP CLUB WOOD CO ALTEA
0.0 0.0 o.o
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
1 0 0 0 1
750 370 223 142
16
0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.3
0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0
32.1
WINNSBORO ISO MEMORIAL MIDDLE WINNSBORO H S
o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 2 0 2
704 263 444
0.3 0.0 0.5
1. 7 0.0 2.7
YANTIS ISO YANTIS SCHOOL
2 2
190 190
1.1 1.1
6.2 6.2
YOAKUM DENVER CITY ISO
DENVER CITY H S DENVER CITY J H EXCALIBUR G E 0/A E
1.2
18.8
0.0
0.0
1.2
7.1
1.3
9.5
10 4 1 5
860 535 318
44
1.1 1.2 0.7 0.3
11.4
6.6 6.8 4.4 1.9
51.5
PLAINS ISO PLAINS H S PLAINS MIDDLE 0.0 o.o 0.0 0.0
3 3 0
294 180 114
1.0 1.7 o.o
6.0 9.6 0.0
YOUNG GRAHAM ISO
GRAHAM H S GRAHAM J H GRAHAM LEARNING CTR
1.4 0.9 0.0
22.5
4.3 0.0 0.0 50.0
2.3 1.1 0.0 50.0
0.9 0.0 0.0 20.0
19 7 0
12
1,281 811 432
47
1.6 1.5 0.9 0.0
25.5
9.0 8.6 5.1 0.0
83.0
NEWCASTLE !SD NEWCASTLE H s
3 3
120 120
2.5 2.5
14.1 14.1
OLNEY ISO OLNEY H S OLNEY J H
0.3 0.5 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
6.0 8.9 0.0
0.8 1.5 0.0
6 6 0
422 265 157
1. 4 2.3 0.0
8.2 12.8 0.0
NOTE: A DASH {-) INDICATES DATA ARE NOT REPORTED TO PROTECT STUDENT ANONYMITY.
115
APPENDIX B 1996-97 CAMPUS DETAIL BY DISTRICT
DROPOUT RATES BY ETHNICITY, ANNUAL DROPOUT RATE, AND ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
COUNTY DISTRICT CAMPUS
WHITE DROPOUT
RATE
AFR. AM OROPOUT
RATE
HISP DROPOUT
RATE
ECON DIS DROPOUT
RATE
1996-97 TOTAL
DROPOUTS
1996-97 7-12
ENROLLMENT
ZAPATA ZAPATA COUNTY I
ZAPATA H S ZAPATA J H
1. 1 1. 7
o.o o.o
0.6 0.6
0.6 0.6
9 7 2
1,339 663 476
ZAVALA CRYSTAL CITY IS
ALTER SCH CRYSTAL CITY H s FLY J H
0.0 0.0 0.0
o.o o.o o.o
2.6 0.0 4.1
2.0 0.0 2.5
25 0
22 3
695 79
541 322
LA PRYOR ISO LA PRYOR H S LA PRYOR MIDDLE 0.0 o.o 0.0 0.0
3 3 0
235 163
72
1996-97 DROPOUT
RATE
0.7 0.7 0.6 0.4
2.5 2.6 0.0 4.1 0.9
1. 3 1.6 0.0
ESTIMATED LONGITUDINAL DROPOUT RATE
4.0 4.0 4.6 2.5
14.0 15.6 0.0
22.0 5.5
7.4 10.6 0.0
NOTE: A DASH (-) INDICATES DATA ARE NOT REPORTED TO PROTECT STUDENT ANONYMITY.
116
PUBLICATION ORDER FORM
Purchaser Name ________________________ Date _______
Send to (name, if different) ----------------------------
Address ____________________________________
City ________________________.State ____ Zip______
To place an order for a publication, fill out information below and make check or money order payable to: Texas Education Agency
Price includes postage, handling, and state tax.
Publication Number Title of Publication Quantity
Price Per Copy
Total Price
GEB 601 05 1996-97 Texas Public School Dropout Report
$9.50
For Tax Exempt Orders Only
To place an order for a publication, fill out information below and make check or money order payable to: Texas Education Agency
Price includes postage and handling.
Publication Number
GE8 601 05
Title of Publication
1996-97 Texas Public School Dropout Report
Price Total Quantity Per Copy Price
$8.50
FOR PUBLICATION INQUIRIES AND PURCHASE ORDERS*, SEND TO:
Texas Education Agency Publications Distribution 1701 North Congress Avenue Austin, Texas 78701-1494
*Purchase orders are accepted only from Texas educational institutions and government agencies.
IF YOU ARE MAILING A CHECK OR MONEY ORDER, REMIT THIS FORM WITH PAYMENT TO:
Texas Education Agency Publications Distribution P. 0. Box 13817 Austin, Texas 78711-3817
Make check or money order payable to: Texas Education Agency
COMPLIANCE STATEMENT
TITLE VI, CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964; THE MODIFIED COURT ORDER, CIVIL ACTION 5281, FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT, EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS, TYLER DIVISION Reviews of local education agencies pertaining to compliance with Title VI Civil Rights Act of 1964 and with specific requirements of the Modified Court Order, Civil Action No. 5281, Federal District Court, Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division are conducted periodically by staff representatives of the Texas Education Agency. These reviews cover at least the following policies and practices:
(1) acceptance policies on student transfers from other school districts;
(2) operation of school bus routes or runs on a nonsegregated basis;
(3) nondiscrimination in extracurricular activities and the use of school facilities;
(4) nondiscriminatory practices in the hiring, assigning, promoting, paying, demoting, reassigning, or dismissing of faculty and staff members who work with children;
(5) enrollment and assignment of students without discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin;
(6) nondiscriminatory practices relating to the use of a student's first language; and
(7) evidence of published procedures for hearing complaints and grievances.
In addition to conducting reviews, the Texas Education Agency staff representatives check complaints of discrimination made by a citizen or citizens residing in a school district where it is alleged discriminatory practices have occurred or are occurring.
Where a violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act is found, the findings are reported to the Office for Civil Rights, U.S. Department of Education.
If there is a direct violation of the Court Order in Civil Action No. 5281 that cannot be cleared through negotiation, the sanctions required by the Court Order are applied.
TITLE VII, CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964 AS AMENDED BY THE EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY ACT OF 1972; EXECUTIVE ORDERS 11246 AND 11375; EQUAL PAY ACT OF 1964; TITLE IX, EDUCATION AMENDMENTS; REHABILITATION ACT OF 1973 AS AMENDED; 1974 AMENDMENTS TO THE WAGE-HOUR LAW EXPANDING THE AGE DISCRIMINATION IN EMPLOYMENT ACT OF 1967; VIETNAM ERA VETERANS READJUSTMENT ASSISTANCE ACT OF 1972 AS AMENDED; .IMMIGRATION REFORM AND CONTROL ACT OF 1986; AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT OF 1990; AND THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1991.
The Texas Education Agency shall comply fully with the nondiscrimination provisions of all federal and state laws, rules, and regulations by assuring that no person shall be excluded from consideration for recruitment, selection, appointment, training, promotion, retention, or any other personnel action, or be denied any benefits or participation in any educational programs ·or activities which it operates on the grounds of race, religion, color, national origin, sex, disability, age, or veteran status (except where age, sex, or disability constitutes a bona fide occupational qualification necessary to proper and efficient administration). The Texas Education Agency is an Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action employer.