Date post: | 19-Mar-2023 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | khangminh22 |
View: | 0 times |
Download: | 0 times |
DEVELOPMENT OF GREENFIELD BHAVANAPADU PORT
DISTRICT SRIKAKULAM, ANDHRA PRADESH
DRAFT EIA REPORT
Andhra Pradesh Maritime Board (APMB)
MARCH 2022
Submitted by:
VOYANTS SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD. 403, 4thFloor, BPTP Park Centra,
Sector -30, NH-8, Gurugram-122001 Phone: 0124-4598 200, Telefax: 0124-4019051
E-mail: [email protected], www.voyants.in
Accredited EIA Consultant Organization by NABET, QCI, New Delhi
Certificate no. NABET/EIA/2124/RA 0223, 30/12/2021 Valid up to 14/09/2021
(S. No. 163 of list of Accredited Consultant Organization (Alphabetically) Rev. 74, March 07, 2019, MoEF&CC)
Project Category: 7(e) A File NO.: 10-56/2020-IA.III Proposal No.: IA/ AP/ MIS/ 173542/ 2020
Monitoring Period Post Monsoon Period- 2020 Pre Monsoon Period- 2021
Monsoon Period- 2021
Development of Greenfield Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | i
DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
REPORT
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port,
Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Sector 7(e)Ports, Harbours, Break Waters and Dredging, Category “A”
Andhra Pradesh Maritime Board
(Government of Andhra Pradesh)
March, 2022
Submitted by:
Voyants Solutions Private Limited.
NABET Certificate No: NABET/EIA/1821/RA 0114
Dated: December 30, 2021, Valid till- September 14, 2024
Lab: Lotus Granges (India) Ltd.
Study Period: Post Monsson2020, Pre-monsoon 2021 & Monsoon, 2021
Development of Greenfield Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | ii
Declaration by Project Proponent
I hereby given undertaking that the data and information given in the EIA report and enclosures belong
to our project “Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh” are true to
the best of my knowledge and belief and I am aware that if any part of the data and information
submitted is found to be false or misleading at any stage, the project will be rejected and clearance
given, if any to the project will be revoked at our risk and cost.
Date: 28-02-2022
Place: Kakinada
Andhra Pradesh Maritime Board
Port Administrative Building, Beach Road, Kakinada-533007
Development of Greenfield Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | iii
Declaration by Experts contributing to the Comprehensive Environmental Impact Assessment for
Study of Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, District Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh.
I, hereby, certify that I was a part of the EIA team in the following capacity that developed the above
EIA.
Mr. Upendar Rao Kollu
Sector Expert
Voyants Solutions Pvt. Ltd.
Project Team A Environment Coordinator Names Signatures
1. Environment Coordinator Mr. Upendar Rao Kollu
B. Functional Area Expert
1. Land Use
Ms. Debasmita Biswal
2. Air Pollution Prevention And
Monitoring
Mr. Santoshkumar Kulkarni
3. Meteorology/ Air Quality
Modelling
Mr. Santoshkumar Kulkarni
4.
Water Pollution Prevention And
Monitoring
Mr. Santoshkumar Kulkarni
Ms. Disha Rao
5. Ecology And Biodiversity Dr. Ashish Rawat (B cat)
6. Noise And Vibration
Mr. Yamesh Sharma
Development of Greenfield Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | iv
7. Socio-Economic
Dr. Arvind Dubey
8. Hydrology
Dr. D. C. Meshram
9. Geology
Dr. D.C. Meshram
10. Soil Conservation
Mr. Yamesh Sharma
11. Risk Assessment and Hazard
Management
Mr. Aprup Adwadkar
12. Solid & Hazardous Waste
Ms. Reshma Thakur
Ms. Disha Rao
C. Team Members
1 Air Pollution Prevention and
Monitoring
Ms. Disha Rao
2 Meteorology/ Air Quality
Modelling
Ms. Disha Rao
Declaration by the head of the Accredited Consultant Organization / Authorized Person I, Santoshkumar
Kulkarni, Head EMS, hereby confirm that the above mentioned experts prepared the EIA report of
“Greenfield Bhavanapadu Port” I also confirm that I shall be fully accountable for any misleading
information mentioned in this statement.
It is certified that no ethical plagiarism have been carried out and external data/ text has not been used
without propoer acknowledgement while preparing this EIA report.
Santoshkumar Kulkarni Date:
Head - EMS
Signatures will be made on Final draft EIA to be submitted to APPCB.
Name of Consultant Voyants Solutions Pvt. Ltd.
Office address 403, 4th Floor, Park Centra, Sector-30, NH-8, Gurgaon- 122001, Haryana, India
NABET-QCI accreditation
certificate
NABET/EIA/2124/RA 0223
Valid up to: September 14, 2024
Sectoral accreditation Accredited for 12 sectors including Sector No 33 “Ports, Harbours Break Waters
Development of Greenfield Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | v
and Dredging”
As per QCI /NABET ‘List of Accredited Consultant Organizations/Rev.19,feb 14,2022, listed in as Accredited
consultant, Category ‘A’ Sl. No. 40
Details of Consultants Engaged Sl.
No Consultants Particulars Date
1. RITES Ltd Detailed Project Report
2. National Centre for Sustainable Coastal
Management (NCSCM)
HTL & LTL Survey
3. Lotus Granges (India) Limited , Andhra
Pradesh
Baseline Monitoring for Air, Water, Soil, Noise,
Sediment, Marine Ecology etc.
4. Department of Ocean Engineering Ind ian
Institute of Technology Madras
Chennai 600 036, India
Topographic Survey
Numerical Modeling
Development of Greenfield Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | vi
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................2
1.1 Background .........................................................................................................................2
1.2 Information about Project Proponent ..................................................................................2
1.3 ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, LEGISLATION AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ...........................3
1.4 Port Site ..............................................................................................................................4
Connectivity ........................................................................................................................7
1.5 Need for Bhavanpadu port development .............................................................................9
Indian port industry ............................................................................................................9
PORTS IN ANDHRA PRADESH ...............................................................................................9
Bhavanapadu port scenario ............................................................................................... 10
1.6 Brief Description of Project development ........................................................................... 11
1.7 EIA STUDY ......................................................................................................................... 12
1.8 Terms of Reference (ToR) Compliance ................................................................................ 12
Detailed in Chapter-7 (Section 7.2) ............................................................................................... 13
1.9 structure of the eia report ................................................................................................. 19
2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ...................................................................................................... 22
2.1 location............................................................................................................................. 22
2.2 Land Area.......................................................................................................................... 22
Proposed Land use of Phase I Development ....................................................................... 22
2.3 Port Traffic ........................................................................................................................ 22
2.4 FIELD SURVEYS AND INVESTIGATIONS ............................................................................... 23
Bathymetry at the proposed port location ......................................................................... 23
Shallow Seismic Survey on south of creek .......................................................................... 24
Geotechnical Investigation ................................................................................................ 27
TidAl Data ......................................................................................................................... 27
Currents ............................................................................................................................ 28
Topography ....................................................................................................................... 28
Development of Greenfield Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | vii
2.5 MATHEMATICAL MODEL STUDIES ...................................................................................... 32
Offshore wind ................................................................................................................... 32
Waves ............................................................................................................................... 32
2.5.2.1 Nearshore Waves .............................................................................................................. 33
Hydrodynamic Study ......................................................................................................... 33
2.5.3.1 Results and discussions ..................................................................................................... 35
Model Studies for Wave Tranquillity .................................................................................. 43
2.5.4.1 Design wave conditions for extreme wave ......................................................................... 43
Tsunami ............................................................................................................................ 45
2.6 Phase I development ......................................................................................................... 46
Cargo Handling Capacity .................................................................................................... 46
Design Vessel Sizes and Dimensions ................................................................................... 47
design considerations ........................................................................................................ 47
NAVIGATIONAL REQUIREMENTS ........................................................................................ 48
2.6.4.1 Design of Navigational Channel ......................................................................................... 48
2.6.4.2 Turning Circle .................................................................................................................... 48
Bed level of channel .......................................................................................................... 48
BERTHing facilities ............................................................................................................. 49
Breakwater ....................................................................................................................... 49
Dredging, disposal and reclamation ................................................................................... 50
2.6.8.1 Capital Dredging ................................................................................................................ 50
2.6.8.2 Reclamation and Disposal .................................................................................................. 50
2.6.8.3 Maintenance Dredging ...................................................................................................... 50
Cargo Handling .................................................................................................................. 50
Cargo Storage .................................................................................................................... 51
Navigational aids ............................................................................................................... 51
Port CRAFT ........................................................................................................................ 51
2.7 Connectivity ...................................................................................................................... 51
Existing Hinterland connectivty ......................................................................................... 51
Development of Greenfield Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | viii
2.7.1.1 Road ................................................................................................................................. 51
2.7.1.2 Rail ................................................................................................................................... 52
dedicated road/rail corridor .............................................................................................. 52
2.7.2.1 Road ................................................................................................................................. 52
2.7.2.2 Rail ................................................................................................................................... 53
Port Internal Infrastructure Facilities ................................................................................. 54
2.7.3.1 Internal Road .................................................................................................................... 54
2.7.3.2 Rail Connectivity to Port .................................................................................................... 54
2.8 Utilities and Services ......................................................................................................... 55
Water supply .................................................................................................................... 55
Power Supply .................................................................................................................... 55
Storm Water Drainage System ........................................................................................... 55
Fire Fighting ...................................................................................................................... 56
Wastewater management ................................................................................................. 57
waste management ........................................................................................................... 57
Details and proper plan of use of renewable energy ........................................................... 57
2.9 CRZ demarcation ............................................................................................................... 57
2.10 Cost Estimates ................................................................................................................... 60
Project Implementation Schedule ...................................................................................... 61
3 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT ................................................................................ 63
3.1 GENERAL ........................................................................................................................... 63
3.2 Study area and Study Period .............................................................................................. 63
3.3 LAND ENVIRONMENT ........................................................................................................ 63
Topography and Regional Setting ...................................................................................... 63
Geology and Geomorphology ............................................................................................ 65
Geology ............................................................................................................................ 65
Geomorphology ................................................................................................................ 66
Hydrogeology .................................................................................................................... 67
3.3.5.1 Water Level Scenario ......................................................................................................... 69
Development of Greenfield Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | ix
Land Use ........................................................................................................................... 72
3.3.6.1 Land use for Port Area ......................................................................................................... 72
3.3.6.2 Land use for Study Area ....................................................................................................... 72
SEISMICITY & EARTHQUAKE .............................................................................................. 75
environmental sensitivity .................................................................................................. 76
3.4 AIR ENVIRONMENT ........................................................................................................... 77
METEOROLOGY ................................................................................................................. 77
3.4.1.1 Secondary data ................................................................................................................. 77
3.4.1.2 Primary Data ..................................................................................................................... 79
Cyclones and depressions .................................................................................................. 80
Air Sampling & Methodology for Monitoring...................................................................... 81
TESTING METHOD FOR AMBIENT AIR QUALITY ................................................................... 81
AMBIENT AIR QUALITY RESULTS ........................................................................................ 84
3.4.5.1 Ambient Air Quality Results for post Monsoon Season ............................................................ 84
3.4.5.2 Result Interpretation ........................................................................................................... 94
3.5 WATER ENVIRONMENT ..................................................................................................... 96
Drainage System ............................................................................................................... 96
SURFACE WATER QUALITY ................................................................................................. 98
3.5.2.1 Sampling Locations for Surface Water Monitoring .................................................................. 98
3.5.2.2 Methodology .................................................................................................................... 98
3.5.2.3 Analysis Result of Surface Water Sampling ............................................................................ 99
3.5.2.4 Result Interpretation ......................................................................................................... 106
GROUND WATER QUALITY ............................................................................................... 106
3.5.3.1 Sampling Location for Ground Water Monitoring ................................................................. 106
3.5.3.2 Methodology .................................................................................................................. 106
3.5.3.3 Analysis Result of Ground Water Sampling .......................................................................... 108
3.6 Soil Quality ..................................................................................................................... 115
SAMPLING & METHODOLOGY FOR MONITORING............................................................. 115
3.6.1.1 Soil Sampling................................................................................................................... 115
Development of Greenfield Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | x
3.6.1.2 Storage Technique........................................................................................................... 115
3.6.1.3 Soil Quality Parameters and Method of Analysis .............................................................. 115
Protocol for Assessment of Soil physico-chemical Properties ............................................ 116
Selection criteria for Soil Sampling Location ..................................................................... 116
Soil reaction classes, Nutrients Availability and Critical Limits ........................................... 118
SOIL ANALYSIS RESULT .................................................................................................... 119
Result Interpretation ....................................................................................................... 128
3.7 NOISE QUALITY ............................................................................................................... 130
Method of Monitoring ..................................................................................................... 130
Identification of sampling locations ................................................................................. 130
NOISE MONITORING STATIONS ....................................................................................... 130
AMBIENT NOISE QUALITY MONITORING RESULTS ............................................................ 131
3.7.4.1 Result Interpretation ......................................................................................................... 132
3.8 BIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT ............................................................................................ 132
TERRESTRIAL ECOLOGY .................................................................................................... 133
Forest Resources ............................................................................................................. 133
Vegetation ...................................................................................................................... 134
Floral Diversity ................................................................................................................ 136
3.8.4.1 Trees ............................................................................................................................... 136
3.8.4.2 Shrub .............................................................................................................................. 141
3.8.4.3 Herbaceous Payment ...................................................................................................... 143
Faunal Diversity .............................................................................................................. 151
3.8.5.1 Mammals ........................................................................................................................ 151
3.8.5.2 Herpetofauna .................................................................................................................. 152
3.8.5.3 Avifauna ......................................................................................................................... 153
3.8.5.4 RET status of fauna .......................................................................................................... 158
3.8.5.5 PROTECTED HABITATS ..................................................................................................... 158
3.8.5.6 BHAVANAPADU CREEK AREA ........................................................................................... 158
3.9 AQUATIC ECOLOGY ......................................................................................................... 159
Development of Greenfield Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | xi
Methodology for Aquatic Study ....................................................................................... 160
Sampling Locations .......................................................................................................... 160
Phytoplankton and zooplankton ...................................................................................... 161
MARINE Water ................................................................................................................ 191
3.9.4.1 Result Interpretation ....................................................................................................... 194
SEDIMENT QUALITY MONITORING ................................................................................... 195
3.9.5.1 Result Interpretation ....................................................................................................... 196
CREEK WATER QUALITY MONITORING ............................................................................. 197
3.9.6.1 Creek Quality Monitoring Results .................................................................................... 197
3.9.6.2 Result Interpretation ....................................................................................................... 205
3.10 SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT .................................................................................................... 206
Project Impact Area ......................................................................................................... 206
3.10.1.1 Tertiary Project Impact Area (PIA): The State of Andhra Pradesh .................................. 206
3.10.1.2 Secondary Project Impact Area (PIA): Srikakulam District ............................................. 207
3.10.1.3 Demographic Profile of the District .............................................................................. 207
3.10.1.4 Culture and Religion .................................................................................................... 208
3.10.1.5 Literacy Rate ............................................................................................................... 208
3.10.1.6 Social Stratification in the District ................................................................................ 209
3.10.1.7 Work Participation Rate .............................................................................................. 209
Primary Project Impact Area ............................................................................................ 209
3.10.2.1 Demographic Profile ................................................................................................... 210
3.10.2.2 Social Stratification ..................................................................................................... 210
3.10.2.3 Literacy Rate ............................................................................................................... 210
3.10.2.4 Work Participation Rate .............................................................................................. 210
3.10.2.5 Main Worker and Marginal Worker ............................................................................. 211
3.10.2.6 Categorization of Main Worker ................................................................................... 211
3.10.2.7 Categorization of Marginal Worker .............................................................................. 211
3.10.2.8 Social Infrastructure .................................................................................................... 212
Socio-economic Survey of Project Impact Area ................................................................. 212
Development of Greenfield Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | xii
3.10.3.1 Household Composition of PAFs .................................................................................. 212
3.10.3.2 Social Stratification and Religion of PAFs ..................................................................... 213
3.10.3.3 Land Holding Pattern of the PAFs ................................................................................ 213
3.10.3.4 Occupational Pattern of the People of PAFs ................................................................. 213
3.10.3.5 Income Pattern of the PAFs ......................................................................................... 214
3.10.3.6 Expenditure Pattern of the PAFs .................................................................................. 214
3.10.3.7 Possession of Durable Consumer Items ........................................................................ 215
3.10.3.8 Status and Role of Women in Economic Activities ........................................................ 215
3.10.3.9 Role of Women in Decision Making ............................................................................. 216
3.10.3.10 Positive Aspects of the Project .................................................................................... 216
4 ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS & MITIGATION MEASURES .............................. 219
4.1 CONstruction phase activities .......................................................................................... 219
4.2 Operation phase activities ............................................................................................... 219
4.3 Construction impacts and mitigation measures ................................................................ 220
Impact due to Land Acquisition ........................................................................................ 220
Impact due to capital dredging and disposal .................................................................... 220
4.3.2.1 Dredge spoil disposal – Mathematical Model Studies ....................................................... 220
4.3.2.2 Impact on Marine Environment ....................................................................................... 230
Impact due to Transport of Construction Material ............................................................ 232
4.3.3.1 Mitigation Measures ....................................................................................................... 232
Impact due to Land reclamation ...................................................................................... 232
4.3.4.1 Mitigation measures ....................................................................................................... 232
Impact on Air Environment .............................................................................................. 233
4.3.5.1 Air Dispersion Modelling ................................................................................................. 233
4.3.5.2 Methodology .................................................................................................................. 234
4.3.5.3 Prediction of Impacts and Sources ................................................................................... 235
4.3.5.4 Meteorology ................................................................................................................... 237
4.3.5.5 Receptor Location ........................................................................................................... 237
4.3.5.6 Emission Calculation and Input Data ................................................................................ 238
Development of Greenfield Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | xiii
4.3.5.7 Model Option Computation and Frame Work .................................................................. 239
4.3.5.8 Model Results ................................................................................................................. 240
4.3.5.9 Conclusion ...................................................................................................................... 244
IMPACTS DUE TO NOISE AND GROUND VIBRATION .......................................................... 245
4.3.6.1 Impact on Noise Level ..................................................................................................... 245
4.3.6.2 Mitigation Measures ....................................................................................................... 246
Impact on water quality .................................................................................................. 247
4.3.7.1 Mitigation Measures for Construction Phase .................................................................... 247
impact on mangroves ...................................................................................................... 247
4.3.8.1 Mitigation measures ....................................................................................................... 249
4.4 Operation phase impacts and mitigation measures .......................................................... 249
Impact on shoreline......................................................................................................... 249
impact on marine environment ....................................................................................... 252
4.4.2.1 Mitigation Measures ....................................................................................................... 252
Littoral drift .................................................................................................................... 253
Impact on air quality ....................................................................................................... 253
4.4.4.1 Mitigation Measures ....................................................................................................... 253
Impact on noise ............................................................................................................... 254
4.4.5.1 Input for Model for sound wave propagation ................................................................... 255
4.4.5.2 Model outputs ................................................................................................................ 256
4.4.5.3 Mitigation Measures to Reduce Ambient Noise Levels ..................................................... 257
Impact on water quality .................................................................................................. 258
4.4.6.1 Mitigation Measures ....................................................................................................... 258
Solid Waste Management ................................................................................................ 260
Impact on Biological Environment ................................................................................... 265
4.4.8.1 Impacts & Mitigation ....................................................................................................... 265
Green Port Initiative ........................................................................................................ 266
5 ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES ............................................................................................ 268
5.1 GENERAL ......................................................................................................................... 268
Development of Greenfield Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | xiv
5.2 ALTERNATIVE LOCATIONS ................................................................................................ 268
ALTERNATIVE 1: NORTH SIDE OF TEKKALI CREEK .............................................................. 269
ALTERNATIVE 2: INSIDE THE TEKKALI CREEK ..................................................................... 271
ALTERNATIVE 3: SOUTH SIDE OF TEKKALI CREEK .............................................................. 273
5.3 COMPARISON OF ALTERNATIVE STUDIES FOR SELECTION OF PROJECT LAYOUT ................ 276
5.3.1.1 ALTERNATIVE 3.1 ............................................................................................................ 280
5.3.1.2 ALTERNATIVE 3.2 ............................................................................................................ 280
5.4 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ....................................................................... 281
6 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAMME ............................................................... 284
6.1 MONITORING PLAN FOR CONSTRUCTION PHASE.............................................................. 284
6.2 MONITORING PLAN FOR OPERATION PHASE .................................................................... 286
Compliance and reporting ............................................................................................... 288
7 ADDITONAL STUDIES ....................................................................................................... 290
7.1 SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT .......................................................................................... 290
Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) ....................................................................................... 290
Legal And Policy Framework ............................................................................................ 290
Purpose and Objective .................................................................................................... 291
Legal Framework for Land Acquisition, Resettlement and Rehabilitation .......................... 292
Applicable Social Safeguard Policy for proposed Greenfield Port Project at Bhavanapadu . 292
Entitlement Matrix .......................................................................................................... 293
Approach and Methodology for SIA ................................................................................. 300
Public Consultations ........................................................................................................ 303
Primary Project Impact Area ............................................................................................ 303
7.1.9.1 Household Composition of PAFs ...................................................................................... 303
7.1.9.2 Social Stratification and Religion of PAFs .......................................................................... 304
7.1.9.3 Land Holding Pattern of the PAFs ..................................................................................... 304
7.1.9.4 Occupational Pattern of the People of PAFs ..................................................................... 304
7.1.9.5 Income Pattern of the PAFs ............................................................................................. 304
7.1.9.6 Expenditure Pattern of the PAFs ...................................................................................... 305
Development of Greenfield Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | xv
7.1.9.7 Possession of Durable Consumer Items ............................................................................ 305
7.1.9.8 Status and Role of Women in Economic Activities ............................................................ 306
7.1.9.9 Role of Women in Decision Making .................................................................................. 306
Impact on Land ............................................................................................................... 307
Impact on Settlement ...................................................................................................... 307
Rehabilitation and Resettlement Budget .......................................................................... 308
7.2 RISK ASSESSMENT AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT PLAN ................................................... 311
DISASTER MANAGEMENT PLAN ....................................................................................... 311
OBJECTIVE OF RISK ASSESSMENT AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT PLAN (DMP) .................. 312
Basic definitions .............................................................................................................. 313
EMERGENCY AT PORT ...................................................................................................... 314
Emergency Classification ................................................................................................. 314
COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS ............................................................................................ 319
Warning System .............................................................................................................. 320
Port Control Room (Emergency Control Centre) ............................................................... 321
Initiation Of Central Control Room -On Disaster Level (i), (ii) and (iii) ............................... 322
FIRE & EXPLOSION ........................................................................................................... 322
Fire in Coal Storage ......................................................................................................... 323
Risk Factors ..................................................................................................................... 323
Safeguards/Guidelines to ensure safety in Coal storage yard/shed ................................... 324
Prevention of Spread of Coal Stock Fires .......................................................................... 325
Re Protection and Firefighting ......................................................................................... 326
Fire fighting Facilities ....................................................................................................... 326
EVACUATION .................................................................................................................. 329
Transportation-Vehicle Pool ............................................................................................ 332
Contact with Railways ..................................................................................................... 332
MEDICAL AND FIRST AID .................................................................................................. 332
OIL SPILL CONTINGENCY PLAN ......................................................................................... 332
Oil Spill Response Organization........................................................................................ 333
Development of Greenfield Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | xvi
Management Team ......................................................................................................... 333
Technical Team ............................................................................................................... 334
Environmental Management Team .................................................................................. 334
Financial Team ................................................................................................................ 335
Logistics Team ................................................................................................................. 335
Press and Personal Relations Team .................................................................................. 336
Oil Spill Response Equipment .......................................................................................... 336
Training, Inspection and Drill Schedule ............................................................................ 336
MUTUAL AID SCHEME ..................................................................................................... 336
COLLISIONS ..................................................................................................................... 337
NATURAL CALAMITIES ..................................................................................................... 340
7.2.33.1 ON SITE / INHOUSE EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS FOR NATURAL CALAMITIES ............... 340
Coastal Flooding .............................................................................................................. 351
Earthquake ..................................................................................................................... 352
Tsunami .......................................................................................................................... 354
7.2.36.1 Characteristics ............................................................................................................ 354
SECURITY THREATS .......................................................................................................... 356
Bomb Threats .................................................................................................................. 356
WAR ALERT ..................................................................................................................... 358
GUIDELINES FOR ASSESSMENT OF TIME TO RESTORE A PORT TO NORMAL OPERATIONAL
CAPABILITY AFTER A CYCLONE / EARTH QUAKE ........................................................................... 359
FOREST LAND ACQUISITION ............................................................................................. 359
8 PROJECT BENEFITS .......................................................................................................... 362
8.1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 362
8.2 INDUCED DEVELOPEMENT ............................................................................................... 362
8.3 IMPROVED SOCIO-ECONOMIC CONDITIONS ..................................................................... 363
8.4 EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES ....................................................................................... 363
8.5 HEALTH, SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENT (hsE) ..................................................................... 363
8.6 ECONOMIC BENEFITS FOR PORT ALIGNED INDUSTRIES ..................................................... 364
Development of Greenfield Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | xvii
8.7 OTHER TANGIBLE BENEFITS ............................................................................................. 364
9 Environmental Cost Benefit Analysis ................................................................................ 366
10 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN .......................................................................... 368
10.1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 368
Administrative and Technical Setup for EMP .................................................................... 369
Institutional Framework of EMP ...................................................................................... 370
Legislative Compliance .................................................................................................... 370
10.1.3.1 International Regulations (India having given acceptance or through tacit acceptance) . 371
National Regulations ....................................................................................................... 371
ENVIRONMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN .............................................................................. 371
Ambient Air Quality ........................................................................................................ 371
10.1.6.1 Mitigation Measures for Construction Phase ............................................................... 371
10.1.6.2 Mitigation Measures for Operation Phase ................................................................... 372
Noise Environment .......................................................................................................... 373
Surface Water Quality ..................................................................................................... 374
10.1.8.1 Surface Water Quality Impacts .................................................................................... 374
10.1.8.2 Mitigation Measures for Construction Phase ............................................................... 375
10.1.8.3 Mitigation Measures for Operation Phase ................................................................... 375
Ground Water Quality ..................................................................................................... 376
10.1.9.1 Ground Water Hydrology ............................................................................................ 376
Waste Management .................................................................................................... 377
10.1.10.1 Waste Water management plan .................................................................................. 377
Mitigation Measures During Construction/Operation Phase ......................................... 377
10.1.11.1 Solid and Hazardous Waste Management Plan ............................................................ 378
10.1.11.2 Mitigation Measures ................................................................................................... 378
Land Environment ....................................................................................................... 381
Socio-Economic Environment ...................................................................................... 382
Biological Environment ............................................................................................... 382
10.1.14.1 Impacts ....................................................................................................................... 383
Development of Greenfield Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | xviii
10.1.14.2 Mitigation measures ................................................................................................... 383
10.2 Greenbelt Development .................................................................................................. 384
Objectives of Greenbelt Development Plan ...................................................................... 384
10.2.1.1 Cost estimations for Greenbelt Development .............................................................. 386
10.2.1.2 Species for Plantation ................................................................................................. 386
OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH MANAGEMENT PLAN ................................................................ 400
Renewable energy and energy conservation plan ............................................................. 401
10.1.1 Cargo management plan .................................................................................................. 402
10.3 Compensatory Mangrove Conservation Plan .................................................................... 403
Mangrove forests in Andhra Pradesh: .............................................................................. 403
10.3.1.1 Mangrove forests in Study Area:.................................................................................. 403
10.3.1.2 Mangrove in the port premises: .................................................................................. 404
Mangrove Plantation Program: ........................................................................................ 404
10.3.2.1 Canals Preparation: ..................................................................................................... 404
10.3.2.2 Geomorphology and hydrology: .................................................................................. 405
10.3.2.3 Species Selection:........................................................................................................ 406
10.3.2.4 Plantations: ................................................................................................................ 406
10.3.2.5 De-silting of canals: ..................................................................................................... 407
10.4 Wildlife Conservation Plan for Schedule I Species ............................................................. 408
BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................. 408
DECLINE OF WILDLIFE ...................................................................................................... 408
OBJECTIVES OF CONSERVATION PLAN .............................................................................. 409
MAMMALS, BIRDS &HERPETOFAUNA OF THE PROJECT AREA (10 km radius) (Belonging to
schedule I of Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 ................................................................................ 409
CONSERVATION STATUS OF REPTILES .............................................................................. 410
CONSERVATION ACTION PLAN ......................................................................................... 418
10.4.6.1 SPECIAL STAFF FOR THE PROTECTION AND ANTI-POACHING ........................................ 418
10.4.6.2 REDUCING MAN WILDLIFE CONFLICTS ......................................................................... 419
10.4.6.3 PROTECTION AND DEVELOPMENT OF HABITAT ............................................................ 419
Development of Greenfield Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | xix
10.4.6.4 CREATING SMALL WATER HOLE/ KHELIS ...................................................................... 419
10.4.6.5 CREATION OF DRINKING WATER FACILITY .................................................................... 419
10.4.6.6 CONSERVING AND RESTORING OF FOREST AREA WATER BODIES ................................. 419
10.4.6.7 PROVISION FOR ENVIRONMENT RESTORATION ........................................................... 419
HABITAT IMPROVEMENT ACTION PLAN ........................................................................... 419
SEED/ SAPLINGS DISTRIBUTION AMONG THE VILLAGERS .................................................. 419
TRAINING AND AWARENESS PROGRAMME ...................................................................... 420
PROMOTION OF RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES .......................................................... 420
FOREST FIRE PROTECTION MEASURES ......................................................................... 420
PROCUREMENT OF EQUIPMENT’S ............................................................................... 420
MONITORING PLAN..................................................................................................... 420
10.4.13.1 Protocol based monitoring of Scheduled Species under Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972
using Daily/ Range level/ Long term Patrols. ............................................................................... 421
FOREST FIRE PROTECTION MEASURESMONITORING OF VEGETATION AND RET SPECIES 421
10.1.2 BUDGETARY FOR CONSERVATION PLAN ........................................................................... 423
10.1.3 CONCLUSION................................................................................................................... 428
10.1.4 FURTHER SUGGESTIONS .................................................................................................. 428
10.5 Shoreline monitoring program ......................................................................................... 429
Rain Water Harvesting..................................................................................................... 429
Storm Water Management .............................................................................................. 429
10.6 IMPLEMENTATION OF EMP ............................................................................................. 429
Constitution of Environmental Management Cell ............................................................. 429
EMP Budget .................................................................................................................... 430
11 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION ......................................................................................... 434
11.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 434
11.2 Location, nature and size of project ................................................................................. 434
11.3 Coastal Regulation Zone .................................................................................................. 435
11.4 Need of the project ......................................................................................................... 435
11.5 Proposed facilities ........................................................................................................... 436
Development of Greenfield Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | xx
Facilities proposed for Phase I development Offshore facility ........................................... 436
Navigational facilities ...................................................................................................... 436
Dredging & reclamation ................................................................................................... 436
Onshore facility ............................................................................................................... 436
11.6 Project cost ..................................................................................................................... 436
11.7 Description of environment ............................................................................................. 437
Air environment .............................................................................................................. 437
Noise environment .......................................................................................................... 437
Water Environment ......................................................................................................... 437
Land environment ........................................................................................................... 437
Terrestrial ecology and biodiversity ................................................................................. 437
11.7.5.1 Flora ........................................................................................................................... 438
11.7.5.2 Fauna: ........................................................................................................................ 438
11.7.5.3 Aquatic Ecology .......................................................................................................... 439
11.7.5.4 Ecologically Sensitive Area ........................................................................................... 439
11.8 Anticipated environmental impacts and mitigation measures ........................................... 439
Construction phase ......................................................................................................... 440
Operation phase ............................................................................................................. 440
11.9 Analysis of alternatives ................................................................................................... 441
11.10 Post project monitoring ................................................................................................... 441
11.11 Additional studies ........................................................................................................... 442
Dredge disposal modelling ........................................................................................... 442
Air quality modelling ................................................................................................... 442
Risk assessment .......................................................................................................... 442
Disaster management plan .......................................................................................... 442
11.12 Project benefits ............................................................................................................... 443
11.13 Environment management plan ....................................................................................... 444
11.14 CONCLUSION................................................................................................................... 444
12 DISCLOSURE OF CONSULTANT ENGAGED ......................................................................... 446
Development of Greenfield Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | xxi
12.1 BRIEF PROFILE OF COMPANY ........................................................................................... 446
12.2 TEAM OF PROFESSIONAL ................................................................................................. 448
12.3 Lotus Granges (India) Ltd. ................................................................................................ 453
TABLES
Table 1.1: Port Limits .................................................................................................................................... 2
Table 1.2: Applicable Acts & Rules ................................................................................................................ 3
Table 1.3: Proposed Bhavanapadu Port Phase I Development .................................................................. 11
Table 1.4: Compliance of ToR ..................................................................................................................... 13
Table 2.1: Phase I Development- Proposed Land Use ................................................................................ 22
Table 2.2: Traffic Projections for Bhavanapadu port .................................................................................. 23
Table 2.3: Tidal variation at Bhavanapadu coast ........................................................................................ 27
Table 2.4: Cargo Handling Capacity ............................................................................................................ 46
Table 2.5: Ship sizes expected at the Port in Phase I .................................................................................. 47
Table 2.6: Design considerations made for ship sizes expected at the Port (Master Plan) ........................ 47
Table 2.7: Design Consideration ................................................................................................................. 47
Table 2.8: Water Depths in the Channel ..................................................................................................... 49
Table 2.9: Dimension of Vessel vs Berths ................................................................................................... 49
Table 2.10: Proposed Dredging Estimation ................................................................................................ 50
Table 2.11: Estimated Dredging Quantities of Phase-I for ship size 1,20,000 DWT ................................... 50
Table 2.12: Equipment for Cargo Handling ................................................................................................. 51
Table 2.13: Water Requirement ................................................................................................................. 55
Table 2.14: Summary of Abstract Capital Cost Estimate for Port Development ........................................ 60
Table 3.1 : Land use for port area ............................................................................................................... 72
Table 3.2: Land use plan for study area ...................................................................................................... 72
Table 3.3: Environmental Sensitivity........................................................................................................... 76
Table 3.4: IMD Meteorological Data – 1981-2010 ...................................................................................... 78
Table 3.5: Lists of historical Cyclones crossed in the Andhra Pradesh ....................................................... 80
Table 3.6: Testing Method for Ambient Air Quality .................................................................................... 81
Development of Greenfield Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | xxii
Table 3.7: Ambient Air Quality Monitoring locations ................................................................................. 81
Table 3.8: Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Result AAQ1 (Post Monsoon Season, Pre Monson, and
Monsoon) (µg/m3) ...................................................................................................................................... 84
Table 3.9: Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Result AAQ2 (Post Monsoon Season, Pre-Monsoon Season,
Monsoon Season) (µg/m3) .......................................................................................................................... 86
Table 3.10: Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Result AAQ3 (Post Monsoon Season, Pre-Monsoon Season,
Monsoon Season) (µg/m3) .......................................................................................................................... 88
Table 3.11: Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Result AAQ4 (Post Monsoon Season, Pre-Monsoon Season,
Monsoon Season) (µg/m3) .......................................................................................................................... 90
Table 3.12: Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Result AAQ5 (Post Monsoon Season, Pre-Monsoon Season,
Monsoon Season) (µg/m3) .......................................................................................................................... 92
Table 3.13: Surface Water Quality Monitoring Locations........................................................................... 98
Table 3.14: Summary of Surface Water Quality Sampling (Post Monsoon Season) ................................. 100
Table 3.15: Summary of Surface Water Quality Monitoring (Pre Monsoon Season) ............................... 102
Table 3.16: Summary of Surface Water Quality Monitoring (Monsoon Season) ..................................... 104
Table 3.17: Details of Ground Water Quality Sampling Locations............................................................ 107
Table 3.18: Summary of Ground Water Monitoring Results (Post Monsoon Season) ............................. 108
Table 3.19: Summary of Ground Water Monitoring Results (Pre Monsoon Season) ............................... 110
Table 3.20: Summary of Ground Water Monitoring Results (Monsoon Season) ..................................... 112
Table 3.21: Methods for Analysis of Soil Properties ................................................................................. 116
Table 3.22: Soil Sampling Locations .......................................................................................................... 117
Table 3.23: Range of Soil Reaction Class, Micro and Macro Nutrients ..................................................... 118
Table 3.24: Summary of Soil Quality Monitoring of One Season in Study area (Post Monsoon Season) 120
Table 3.25: Summary of Soil Quality Monitoring of One Season in Study area (Pre – Monsoon Season)123
Table 3.26: Summary of Soil Quality Monitoring of One Season in Study area (Monsoon Season) ........ 125
Table 3.27: Details of Noise Monitoring Stations ..................................................................................... 130
Table 3.28: Leq day time and night time noise levels and Leq day and night time noise levels during Post-
monsoon, Pre-Monsoon and Monsoon season study period .................................................................. 131
Table 3.29: List of Major Tree Species found in the Study Area ............................................................... 136
Table 3.30: List of Major Shrub Species found in the Study Area ............................................................. 141
Development of Greenfield Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | xxiii
Table 3.31: List of Major Herbaceous Flora found in the Study Area ....................................................... 143
Table 3.32: Important Mammalian Species Found in the Study Area ...................................................... 151
Table 3.33: Amphibians recorded in and around the wetlands of Study Area ......................................... 152
Table 3.34: Reptiles recorded in and around the wetlands of Study Area ............................................... 152
Table 3.35: Avi-Faunal Species recorded in and around the wetlands of Study Area .............................. 154
Table 3.36: Location of Aquatic Studies .................................................................................................... 160
Table 3.37: Density, Frequency, Abundance and Shanon Wiener diversity Index (H) of Phytoplankton and
Zooplanktons at M-3 (Post - Monsoon, Oct 2020) ................................................................................... 161
Table 3.38: Density, Frequency, Abundance and Shanon Wiener diversity Index (H) of Phytoplankton and
Zooplanktons at M-4 (Post - Monsoon, Oct 2020) ................................................................................... 164
Table 3.39: Density, Frequency, Abundance and Shanon Wiener diversity Index (H) of Phytoplankton and
Zooplanktons at M-5 (Post - Monsoon, Oct 2020) ................................................................................... 166
Table 3.40: Density, Frequency, Abundance and Shanon Wiener diversity Index (H) of Phytoplankton and
Zooplanktons at M-6 (Post - Monsoon, Oct 2020) ................................................................................... 168
Table 3.41: Average of data of Frequency, Density, Abundance and Shanon Wiener Diversity Index (H) of
Benthic Organisms at M-3 Post - Monsoon, Oct 2020) ............................................................................ 170
Table 3.42: Average of data of Frequency, Density, Abundance and Shanon Wiener Diversity Index (H) of
Benthic Organisms at M-4 (Post-Monsoon, Oct 2020) ............................................................................. 170
Table 3.43: Average of data of Frequency, Density, Abundance and Shanon Wiener Diversity Index (H) of
Benthic Organisms at M-5 (Post-Monsoon, Oct 2020) ............................................................................. 170
Table 3.44: Average of data of Frequency, Density, Abundance and Shanon Wiener Diversity Index (H) of
Benthic Organisms at M-6 (Post-Monsoon, Oct 2020) ............................................................................. 171
Table 3.45: Density, Frequency, Abundance and Shanon Wiener diversity Index (H) of Phytoplankton and
zooplankton at M-3 (Pre - Monsoon, April 2021) ..................................................................................... 172
Table 3.46: Density, Frequency, Abundance and Shanon Wiener diversity Index (H) of Phytoplankton and
Zooplanktons at M-4 (Pre-Monsoon, April 2021) ..................................................................................... 174
Table 3.47: Density, Frequency, Abundance and Shanon Wiener diversity Index (H) of Phytoplankton and
Zooplanktons at M-5 (Pre-Monsoon, April 2021) ..................................................................................... 176
Table 3.48: Density, Frequency, Abundance and Shanon Wiener diversity Index (H) of Phytoplankton and
Zooplanktons at M-6 (Pre-Monsoon, April 2021) ..................................................................................... 178
Table 3.49: Average of data of Frequency, Density, Abundance and Shanon Wiener Diversity Index (H) of
Benthic Organisms at M-3 (Pre-Monsoon, April 2021)............................................................................. 180
Development of Greenfield Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | xxiv
Table 3.50: Average of data of Frequency, Density, Abundance and Shanon Wiener Diversity Index (H) of
Benthic Organisms at M-4 (Pre-Monsoon, April 2021)............................................................................. 180
Table 3.51: Average of data of Frequency, Density, Abundance and Shanon Wiener Diversity Index (H) of
Benthic Organisms at M-5 (Pre-Monsoon, April 2021)............................................................................. 181
Table 3.52: Average of data of Frequency, Density, Abundance and Shanon Wiener Diversity Index (H) of
Benthic Organisms at M-6 (Pre-Monsoon, April 2021)............................................................................. 181
Table 3.53: Density, Frequency, Abundance and Shanon Wiener diversity Index (H) of Phytoplankton and
Zooplanktons at M-3 (Monsoon, September 2021) ................................................................................. 182
Table 3.54: Density, Frequency, Abundance and Shanon Wiener diversity Index (H) of Phytoplankton and
Zooplanktons at M-4 (Monsoon, September 2021) ................................................................................. 184
Table 3.55: Density, Frequency, Abundance and Shanon Wiener diversity Index (H) of Phytoplankton and
Zooplanktons at M-5 (Monsoon, September 2021) ................................................................................. 186
Table 3.56: Density, Frequency, Abundance and Shanon Wiener diversity Index (H) of Phytoplankton and
Zooplanktons at M-6 (Monsoon, September 2021) ................................................................................. 188
Table 3.57: Average of data of Frequency, Density, Abundance and Shanon Wiener Diversity Index (H) of
Benthic Organisms at M-3 (Monsoon, September 2021) ......................................................................... 190
Table 3.58: Average of data of Frequency, Density, Abundance and Shanon Wiener Diversity Index (H) of
Benthic Organisms at M-4 (Monsoon, September 2021) ......................................................................... 190
Table 3.59: Average of data of Frequency, Density, Abundance and Shanon Wiener Diversity Index (H) of
Benthic Organisms at M-5 (Monsoon, September 2021) ......................................................................... 190
Table 3.60: Average of data of Frequency, Density, Abundance and Shanon Wiener Diversity Index (H) of
Benthic Organisms at M-6 (Monsoon, September 2021) ......................................................................... 191
Table 3.61: Marine Monitoring Locations................................................................................................. 191
Table 3.62: Marine Quality Test reports for Post-Monsoon Season ........................................................ 192
Table 3.63: Marine Quality Test reports for Pre-Monsoon Season .......................................................... 193
Table 3.64: Marine Quality Test reports for Monsoon Season ................................................................. 194
Table 3.65: Sediment Quality Monitoring Locations ................................................................................ 195
Table 3.66: Sediment Quality results for Post-Monsoon Season ............................................................. 196
Table 3.67: Sediment Quality results for Pre-Monsoon Season ............................................................... 196
Table 3.68: Sediment Quality results for Monsoon Season ...................................................................... 196
Table 3.69: Creek Sampling Locations ...................................................................................................... 197
Table 3.70: Summary of Creek Quality Results (Post Monsoon Season) .................................................. 197
Development of Greenfield Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | xxv
Table 3.71: Summary of Creek Quality Results (Pre Monsoon Season) ................................................... 200
Table 3.72: Summary of Creek Quality Results (Monsoon Season) .......................................................... 203
Table 3.73: Demographic Profile of the District ....................................................................................... 208
Table 3.74: Religion wise distribution of Population ................................................................................ 208
Table 3.75: Social Stratification in the District ......................................................................................... 209
Table 3.76: Demographic Profile of the Affected Villages ........................................................................ 210
Table 3.77: Details of SC and ST Population ............................................................................................. 210
Table 3.78: Literacy Rate of the Affected Villages .................................................................................... 210
Table 3.79: Work Participation Rate of the Affected Villages .................................................................. 211
Table 3.80: Main Worker and Marginal Worker ....................................................................................... 211
Table 3.81: Categorization of Main Worker.............................................................................................. 211
Table 3.82: Categorization of Marginal Worker ....................................................................................... 212
Table 3.83: Educational Infrastructure ..................................................................................................... 212
Table 3.84: Household Composition of the People of Affected Villages .................................................. 213
Table 3.85: Land Holding Pattern of PAFs ................................................................................................. 213
Table 3.86: Occupational Pattern of the People of affected Villages ...................................................... 214
Table 3.87: Income Pattern of the PAFs .................................................................................................. 214
Table 3.88: Expenditure Pattern of the PAFs ........................................................................................... 214
Table 3.89: Possession of Durable Consumer Items ................................................................................ 215
Table 3.90: Engagement of Women in Economic Activities .................................................................... 215
Table 3.91: Role of Women in Decision Making of Households Matter .................................................. 216
Table 4.1: Distance to dilution of dredge dispersion at the time of Flood tide ........................................ 222
Table 4.2: Distance to dilution of dredge dispersion at the time of Ebb tide ........................................... 222
Table 4.3: Distance to dilution of dredge dispersion at the time of High tide ......................................... 223
Table 4.4: Distance to dilution of dredge dispersion at the time of Low tide .......................................... 223
Table 4.5: Distance to dilution of dredge dispersion at the time of Flood tide ........................................ 226
Table 4.6: Distance to dilution of dredge dispersion at the time of Ebb tide ........................................... 226
Table 4.7: Distance to dilution of dredge dispersion at the time of High tide ......................................... 227
Table 4.8: Distance to dilution of dredge dispersion at the time of Low tide .......................................... 227
Development of Greenfield Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | xxvi
Table 4.9 : Emission Calculation Input Data for Air Dispersion Modeling ................................................ 238
Table 4.10 : Predicted maximum incremental GLC of all pollutants (μg/m3) ........................................... 243
Table 4.11 : 24 Hourly Incremental Concentration Prediction during Construction Phase ..................... 244
Table 4.13: Machinery vs Noise Levels ..................................................................................................... 246
Table 4.14: Wave characteristics for the present study ........................................................................... 249
Table 4.15: Modelling Output ................................................................................................................... 256
Figure 4.16: Modelling Output .................................................................................................................. 257
Table 4.17: Activity and Impacts during construction and operation phase of proposed port project ... 262
Table 5.1 Comparative Matrix of all three locations along Bhavanapadu Coast ...................................... 275
Table 5.2: Comparison between Alternative 1, Alternative 2 and Alternative 3 ...................................... 276
Table 6.1: Environmental Monitoring Programme-Construction Phase .................................................. 285
Table 6.2: Environmental Monitoring Programme-Operation Phase ....................................................... 286
Table 7.1: Entitlement Matrix ................................................................................................................... 294
Table 7.2: Steps taken to prepare SIA & RAP Reports .............................................................................. 301
Table 7.3: Household Composition of the People of Affected Villages .................................................... 303
Table 7.4: Land Holding Pattern of PAFs ................................................................................................... 304
Table 7.5: Occupational Pattern of the People of affected Villages ........................................................ 304
Table 7.6: Income Pattern of the PAFs..................................................................................................... 305
Table 7.7: Expenditure Pattern of the PAFs ............................................................................................. 305
Table 7.8: Possession of Durable Consumer Items .................................................................................. 305
Table 7.9: Engagement of Women in Economic Activities ...................................................................... 306
Table 7.10: Role of Women in Decision Making of Households Matter .................................................. 306
Table 7.11: Details of Land to be Acquired/Transferred for the Proposed Project .................................. 307
Table 7.12: Rehabilitation and Resettlement Budget ............................................................................... 309
Table 7.13: Bhavanapadu Port– Area Vulnerability & Threat Matrix ....................................................... 315
Table 7.14: Event Scenarios Bhavanapadu Port ....................................................................................... 317
Table 7.15: Communication Network Elements within the Port on Site .................................................. 320
Table 7.16: Bhavanapadu Communication Contact Numbers .................................................................. 320
Table 7.17: Emergency Control Centre at Signal Station .......................................................................... 321
Development of Greenfield Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | xxvii
Table 7.18: Central Disaster Management Control Room ........................................................................ 321
Table 7.19: Methods of Dealing with Different Types of Fires & Leakage ............................................... 323
Table 7.20:Bhavanapdu Fire Fighting Resources ...................................................................................... 328
Table 7.21: Fixed Fire Fighting Equipment- Tanker Jetty .......................................................................... 329
Table 7.22:Average Number of Labour, Supervisors Within Port/Shift .................................................... 330
Table 7.23:Movements Through Gates .................................................................................................... 330
Table 7.24: Location of Canteens .............................................................................................................. 330
Table 7.25:Evacuation Action-Coordination and Specific Follow Up ........................................................ 331
Table 7.26:Evacuation Routes ................................................................................................................... 331
Table 7.27:Relief Centres .......................................................................................................................... 331
Table 7.28:Food Packets Suppliers ........................................................................................................... 331
Table 7.29:List of private vehicle contractors ........................................................................................... 332
Table 7.30: Oil Spill Response Equipment List .......................................................................................... 336
Table 7.31: Training, Inspection and Drill Schedule .................................................................................. 336
Table 7.32: Format for preparation of Telephone directory .................................................................... 336
Table 7.33: Collision: Port Flotilla And Vessels Calling At Bhavanapadu Port ......................................... 337
Table 7.34: Fire / Explosion Checklist For Use In Emergency ................................................................... 338
Table 7.35: Bunker Spill/Leakage Checklist for Use in Emergency ........................................................... 338
Table 7.36: Vessel Grounding In Port- Detailed Action by Port ................................................................ 339
Table 7.37: Sinking Of Vessel In Port ........................................................................................................ 339
Table 7.38: Contact Details of International and National Agencies ........................................................ 342
Table 7.39: Field Units Composition ......................................................................................................... 345
Table 7.40: Action Plan Floods-Similar To Cyclone ................................................................................... 352
Table 7.41: Detail of Relief Work after Earth Quake ................................................................................ 353
Table 7.42: Detail of Onsite Action Group ................................................................................................ 356
Table 7.43: Detail of Central Disaster Management Group ..................................................................... 356
Table 7.44: Detail of Onsite Action Group for Bomb Treat ....................................................................... 357
Table 7.45: Detail of Steps and Resources Used To Mitigate the Effects Pre to Post Cyclone ................. 359
Table 7.46: Details of Divisions involved ................................................................................................... 360
Development of Greenfield Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | xxviii
Table 8.1: Details of employment opportunities during construction and operation phase ................... 363
Table 10-1 Recommended Plants for Greenbelt Development ................................................................ 387
Table 10-2 Per Ha. Cost Norms for Model Plantation Works ................................................................... 390
Table 10-3 Cost Analysis per Ha of Enrichment Plantation ...................................................................... 395
Table 10-4 Total Cost Estimation for Green Belt ...................................................................................... 399
Table 10-5 Different tasks in navigational services to ships ..................................................................... 400
Table 10-6 Different tasks in handling services to cargos......................................................................... 400
Table 10-7 Budgetary estimates for Mangrove Plantation....................................................................... 407
Table 10-8: List of Schedule I species ........................................................................................................ 409
Table 10-9: Budgetary allocation for conservation Plan ........................................................................... 424
Table 10-10: Year wise fund to be submitted by the user agency to State Forest Department, AP ........ 427
Table 10-11 Environmental Management Plan during Construction Phase ............................................. 430
Table 10-12 Environmental Management Plan during Operation Phase ................................................. 431
Table 12.1: Qualification and Area of Expertise of Professional............................................................... 449
FIGURES
Figure 1.1: Port Limits ................................................................................................................................... 3
Figure 1.2 : Location Map ............................................................................................................................. 5
Figure 1.3: Port Layout map .......................................................................................................................... 6
Figure 1.4: Port Site Photographs ................................................................................................................. 7
Figure 1.5: Road and Rail Connectivity Map (a) ............................................................................................ 8
Figure 1.6: Road and Rail Connectivity Map (b) ............................................................................................ 8
Figure 1.7: Bhavanapadu Port Hinterland .................................................................................................. 11
Figure 2.1: Bathymetric Data of Bhavanapadu Port ................................................................................... 24
Figure 2.2: Seismic Survey details of the proposed outer Harbour Location ............................................. 26
Figure 2.3: Borehole Locations ................................................................................................................... 27
Figure 2.4: Tidal variation during survey period ......................................................................................... 28
Figure 2.5: Topo survey Map for Bhavanapadu Port (A) ............................................................................ 29
Development of Greenfield Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | xxix
Figure 2.6: Topo survey Map for Bhavanapadu Port (B) ............................................................................ 30
Figure 2.7: Topo survey Map for Bhavanapadu Port (B) ............................................................................ 31
Figure 2.8: Typical offshore wind rose diagram – Bhavanapadu ................................................................ 32
Figure 2.9: Computational mesh generated from the boundary curve ...................................................... 34
Figure 2.10: Bathymetry represented in the computational mesh ............................................................ 34
Figure 2.11: Bathymetry interpolated with the computational mesh ........................................................ 35
Figure 2.12: Tidal Elevation Range in the Boundary for 15 day time period .............................................. 35
Figure 2.13: Times of tide at which results are plotted .............................................................................. 36
Figure 2.14: Velocity contour and vector plot during raising tide at 0 hrs for Case I ................................. 37
Figure 2.15: Velocity contour and vector plot during raising tide at 1.5 hrs for Case I .............................. 37
Figure 2.16: Velocity contour and vector plot during high tide at 3.1 hrs for Case I .................................. 38
Figure 2.17: Velocity contour and vector plot during ebbing tide at 6.2 hrs for Case I .............................. 38
Figure 2.18: Velocity contour and vector plot during low tide at 9.3 hrs for Case I ................................... 39
Figure 2.19: Velocity contour and vector plot during raising tide at 12.4 hrs for Case I ............................ 39
Figure 2.20: Velocity contour and vector plot during raising tide at 0 hrs for Case II ................................ 40
Figure 2.21: Velocity contour and vector plot during raising tide at 1.5 hrs for Case II ............................. 41
Figure 2.22: Velocity contour and vector plot during high tide at 3.1 hrs for Case II ................................. 41
Figure 2.23: Velocity contour and vector plot during ebbing tide at 6.2 hrs for Case II ............................. 42
Figure 2.24: Velocity contour and vector plot during low tide at 9.3 hrs for Case II .................................. 42
Figure 2.25: Velocity contour and vector plot during raising tide at 12.4 hrs for Case II ........................... 43
Figure 2.26: Port Layout –Channel Aligned North East (NE) Direction ....................................................... 44
Figure 2.27: Wave height distribution for extreme waves from South (S) ................................................. 44
Figure 2.28: Wave height distribution for extreme waves from South East (SE) ....................................... 45
Figure 2.29: Wave height distribution for extreme waves from East (E) ................................................... 45
Figure 2.30: Hazard map depicting expected mean tsunami water levels along the ................................. 46
Figure 2.31: Schematic Layout Plan at Naupada Railway Station for Loop line to Bhavanapadu port ...... 53
Figure 2.32: Cross-section of Internal Road ................................................................................................ 54
Figure 2.33: Phase I Bhavanapadu Port Layout CZMP map ........................................................................ 58
Figure 2.34: Phase I Bhavanapadu Port Layout CZMP map ........................................................................ 59
Development of Greenfield Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | xxx
Figure 3.1: Study Area – 10 km radius from Port Boundary ....................................................................... 64
Figure 3.2: Geology and Mineral Map ........................................................................................................ 65
Figure 3.3: Hydrogeology- Srikakulam District............................................................................................ 68
Figure 3.4: Depth to Water level – Pre Monsoon (May 2020), Srikakulum District ................................... 69
Figure 3.5: Depth to Water level – Monsoon (August , 2020), Srikakulum District .................................... 70
Figure 3.6: Depth to Water level – Post Monsoon (November 2020), Srikakulum District ........................ 70
Figure 3.7: Depth to Groundwater levels in Srikakulam by Percentage October 2020 to October 2021 .. 71
Figure 3.8: Depth to Groundwater levels in Santabommali Mandal (2021-2022) ..................................... 71
Figure 3.9: Landuse Map – 10 Km Radius LULC .......................................................................................... 73
Figure 3.10: Landuse Map- Project Site ...................................................................................................... 74
Figure 3.11: Seismicity Map of Andhra Pradesh ......................................................................................... 75
Figure 3.12: Annual average Wind-rose diagram of IMD station Vishakhapatnam (1981-2010 ................ 79
Figure 3.13: Primary Wind-Rose Diagram- Monsoon Season ..................................................................... 80
Figure 3.14: Air Monitoring Photographs ................................................................................................... 82
Figure 3.15: Google Earth Image Showing Monitoring Locations – require on SOI map ................................. 83
Figure 3.16: Drainage map of the Study area ............................................................................................. 97
Figure 3.17: Surface Water Quality Sampling Photographs ....................................................................... 99
Figure 3.18: Soil Quality Sampling Photographs ....................................................................................... 117
Figure 3.19: Noise Monitoring Photographs ............................................................................................. 131
Figure 3.20: Forest Cover Map of Andhra Pradesh depicting the Project Site ......................................... 134
Figure 3.21: Study Area Habitat Photographs .......................................................................................... 135
Figure 3.22: Family-wise distribution of the Tree Species found in the Study Area ................................. 140
Figure 3.23: Habit-wise distribution of Tree Species found in the Study Area ......................................... 140
Figure 3.24: Family-wise distribution of the Shrub Species found in the Study Area .............................. 143
Figure 3.25: Family-wise distribution of Herbaceous Flora found in the Study Area ............................... 151
Figure 3.26: Creek Mouth Biodiversity ..................................................................................................... 159
Figure 3.27: Marine Study Sampling Photographs ................................................................................... 192
Figure 3.28: Sediment Quality Sampling Photographs ............................................................................. 195
Figure 4.1: Computational mesh generated from the boundary curve .................................................... 221
Development of Greenfield Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | xxxi
Figure 4.2: Dredge dispersion pattern during flooding tide (offshore) .................................................... 224
Figure 4.3: Dredge dispersion pattern during high tide (offshore) ........................................................... 225
Figure 4.4: Dredge dispersion pattern during ebbing tide (offshore)....................................................... 225
Figure 4.5: Dredge dispersion pattern during low tide (offshore) ............................................................ 225
Figure 4.6: Dredge dispersion pattern during flooding tide (offshore) .................................................... 227
Figure 4.7: Dredge dispersion pattern during high tide (offshore) ........................................................... 228
Figure 4.8: Dredge dispersion pattern during ebbing tide (offshore)....................................................... 228
Figure 4.9: Dredge dispersion pattern during low tide (offshore) ............................................................ 229
Figure 4.10: Methodology adopted for Air Dispersion Modelling Study .................................................. 235
Figure 4.11: Primary Windrose for monsoon season ............................................................................... 237
Figure 4.12 : Air Modelling Receptor Location ......................................................................................... 238
Figure 4.13: Spatial Distribution 24 hrs maximum incremental GLC of the PM10 in μg/m3..................... 241
Figure 4.14: Spatial Distribution 24 hrs maximum incremental GLC of the PM2.5 in μg/m3 ..................... 241
Figure 4.15: Spatial Distribution 24 hrs maximum incremental GLC of the NO2 in μg/m3 ....................... 242
Figure 4.16: Spatial Distribution 24 hrs maximum incremental GLC of the SO2 in μg/m3 ........................ 242
Figure 4.17: Spatial Distribution 24 hrs maximum incremental GLC of the CO in μg/m3 ......................... 243
Figure 4.18: Port boundary on CZMP ........................................................................................................ 248
Figure 4.19: Location and distance of Northern breakwater from the creek ........................................... 251
Figure 4.20: Shoreline evolution ............................................................................................................... 252
Figure 5.1: Alternative locations identified for Bhavanapadu Port ......................................................... 269
Figure 5.2 Alternative-I location ............................................................................................................... 270
Figure 5.3: Proposed Port Layout-North of Tekkali Creek for Alternative-I Site ...................................... 271
Figure 5.4 Alternative-II location .............................................................................................................. 272
Figure 5.5: Port Layout at Tekkali Creek for Alternative II Location ......................................................... 273
Figure 5.6 Alternative-III locations identified for Bhavanapadu Port ....................................................... 274
Figure 5.7: Port Layout-South of Tekkali Creek (Alternative 3.1) ............................................................. 280
Figure 5.8: Port Layout-South of Tekkali Creek (Alternative 3.2) Recommended Option/ Layout .......... 281
Figure 7.1: Disaster Management Chart ................................................................................................... 312
Figure 7.2 Oil Spill Contingency Organisation ........................................................................................... 333
Development of Greenfield Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | xxxii
Figure 7.3: Response Team Chart ............................................................................................................. 340
Figure 7.4: Action Plan for Earthquake ..................................................................................................... 353
Figure 10.1 Components and Strategies for Environmental Management Plan ...................................... 369
Figure 10.2: Segregation Process from Identified Zones .......................................................................... 381
Figure 10.3 : Bhavanapadu Layout (Greenbelt) ........................................................................................ 389
Figure 10.4 Mangroves at Tekkali Creek ................................................................................................... 403
Figure 10.5 Main canal and side canal preparations ................................................................................ 404
Figure 10.6: Design for the canal preparations......................................................................................... 405
Figure 10.7 Cross section of canals with dimensions ............................................................................... 406
Figure 10.8 Plantation method ................................................................................................................. 407
LIST OF ANNEXURE
ANNEXURE NO ANNEXURE NAME
ANNEXURE 1.1 ToR Letter
ANNEXURE 3.1 NABET Accreditation Cretificate of Concerned Lab
ANNEXURE 4.1 CRZ Map
ANNEXURE 5.1 Socio-economic Impact Assessment
ANNEXURE 6.1 Biodiversity Coservation Plan
ANNEXURE 7.1 QCI NABET Certificate
Development of Greenfield Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 1
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
Development of Greenfield Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 2
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 BACKGROUND
Andhra Pradesh, with an area of 1, 60,205 square kilometer ranks seventh in terms of geographical area.
The state boasts of the second longest coastline of approximately 975 km which provides it with the
vantage of monetizing on marine activities on a large scale. Andhra Pradesh was amongst the first
maritime states to recognize the imperative need for increased port infrastructure and currently has
Fifteen (15) notified non-major ports and one (1) major port (Visakhapatnam). The state has also
realized the importance and benefits of modernizing the ports and adapting PPP models in managing
them and envisages to develop facilities to handle cargo of 100 MMTPA and 300 MMTPA by 2019-2020
and 2020-21 respectively.
As part of its endeavor in the development of port infrastructure, Andhra Pradesh Maritime Board
(APMB) has proposed to undertake development of Greenfield port at Bhavanapadu in Srikakulam
District, Andhra Pradesh. GoAP has issued port limits vide G. O. Ms. No. 545 of T, R&B Transport, Roads
and Buildings (P.I.) Department, Dt. 02nd July, 1979 are as given in Figure 1.1.
However, since the port limits are fixed in 1979, considering the present requirement and phase wise
development, Director of Ports/APMB has requested Government of Andhra Pradesh to extend the port
limits. The co-ordinates of Bhavanapadu Port limits in the waterfront area are as given in Table 1.1 and
Figure 1.1.
Table 1.1: Port Limits Port Limits
NW Corner A Latitude:18°35’8.44”N Longitude:84°21’44.35”E
NE Corner B Latitude:18°32’21.7’N Longitude:84°26’29.45”E
SE Corner C Latitude:18°27’5.08”N Longitude:84°21’52.5”E
SW Corner D Latitude:18°30’48.83”N Longitude:84°18’5.30”E
APMB appointed M/s. Voyants Solutions Private Limited for “Preparation of EIA and CRZ Reports and
obtaining of environmental and CRZ clearance from Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate
Change (MoEF&CC).
1.2 INFORMATION ABOUT PROJECT PROPONENT
Name and
Designation
: Mr. K. Muralidharan, Chief Executive Officer
Address : Andhra Pradesh Maritime Board (APMB), Port Administrative Building,
Beach Road, P.B.No.11, Kakinada – 533 001, Andhra Pradesh.
Contact details : Email: [email protected]
Phone: 8879972997
Web: www. ports.ap.gov.in
Development of Greenfield Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 3
Figure 1.1: Port Limits
1.3 ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, LEGISLATION AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
As per the list of projects or activities requiring prior Environmental Clearance given in the EIA
Notification issued by MoEF&CC on 14th September 2006, proposed project is listed in schedule 7(e) i.e.,
Ports and Harbours and requires Environmental Clearance from MoEF&CC. Also the project attracts CRZ
notification, 2011 and 2019 and require CRZ clearance form MoEF&CC through recommendations of
Andhra Pradesh Coastal Zone Management Authority (APCZMA).
The Phase I development of Bhavanapadu port is proposed to handle ~23.53 Million Tonnes per Annum
(MTPA) of various types of cargo falls under Category A and shall obtain Environmental and CRZ
Clearance from MoEF&CC.The Phase II is 83.3 Million Tonnes per Annum (MTPA).Applicable Acts and
Rules are presented in the below Table 1.2.
Table 1.2: Applicable Acts & Rules Legal Requirement Compliance/Application
The Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 An Act to provide for the protection and improvement of environment
and the prevention of hazards to human beings, other living creatures,
Development of Greenfield Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 4
Legal Requirement Compliance/Application
plants and property
The Air (Prevention & Control of
Pollution) Act,1981
An Act to provide for the prevention, control and abatement of air
pollution, relates to the issue of the Consent to Establish (CTE) and
Consent to Operate (CTO)
The Water (Prevention & Control of
Pollution) Act, 1974
An Act to provide for the prevention and control of water pollution,
relates to the issue relates to the issue of the Consent to Establish
(CTE) and Consent to Operate (CTO) for the water requirement for the
day to day project operations and daily unit wise waste generation
Forest (Conservation) Act 1980, Forest
Conservation Rules, 1981
Conservation and protection of forests areas and applicable policy for
diversion of forest areas for non- forest purpose/activities.
Environmental Impact Assessment
Notification, 2006 (As amended)
Activities attracting prior environmental clearance from either state or
central authorities and its procedure is defined.
Coastal Regulation Zone Notification,
2011
An act to empower the State and the GoI authorities to take measures
for protection of the coastal environment and preventing, abating and
controlling environmental pollution in the coastal areas
The Noise Pollution (Control & Regulation
) Rules, 2000, amendment rules, 2010
Control of noise pollution
Solid Waste Management Rule,2016 (as
amended)
Solid waste generation and management
Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and
Resettlement Act, 2013
For land acquisition and R&R applicable for the project development
E-Waste Management Rule,
2016,amended 2018
Waste electrical and electronic equipment, whole or in part or rejects
from their manufacturing and repair process, which are intended to
be discarded
The Construction and Demolition (C&D)
Waste Management Rules, 2016
Handling the materials as per the provisions of the storage and
disposal of the Construction and Demolition (C&D) Waste
Management Rules
Hazardous waste management rules,
2016
To ensure safe handling, generation, processing, treatment, package,
storage, transportation, use reprocessing, collection, conversion, and
offering for sale, destruction and disposal of Hazardous Waste
The Manufacture, Storage and Import of
Hazardous Chemical (Amendment) Rules,
2000
Prevention of accidents and major damages due to handling of
hazardous materials
1.4 PORT SITE
Proposed site for port development is located at Bhavanapadu village, located at latitude of 18°35’ N;
longitude of 84°26'E, Santhabommali mandal, Srikakulam district, Andhra Pradesh. The port location is
about 85 nautical miles of north east of Visakhapatnam Port. Location map is shown in Figure 1.2. Port
location is shown in Figure 1.3 and Port site photographs is given in Figure 1.4.
Development of Greenfield Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 5
Figure 1.2 : Location Map
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 6
Figure 1.3: Port Layout map
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 7
Open land with seasonal flora Open land with scrub vegetation
Figure 1.4: Port Site Photographs
Land area of 1010 acres (408.7 ha) with a waterfront of 10.3 km is allotted by GoAP for development of
Bhavanapadu port. Land comprises of scattered trees of cashew, casuarina, palm trees , coastal sand,
salt pans and open scrub areas. The port site is sloped towards Bay of Bengal and elevation varies from
2.0 m to 22.0 m.
CONNECTIVITY
The National Highway No. 16 (Chennai-Kolkata) is at a distance of about 14km to the proposed
Bhavanapadu port. The nearest railway station to the proposed port location is Naupada Junction (East
Coast Railway) on Chennai- Howrah BG main line at about 7 km from Bhavanapadu. Naupada junction is
177km from Visakhapatnam and 231km from Bhubaneswar. Dedicated road/rail corridor is proposed
from the proposed port site. Out of 1010 acres, an area of ~184 acres is required for external road/rail
connectivity.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 8
Figure 1.5: Road and Rail Connectivity Map (a)
Figure 1.6: Road and Rail Connectivity Map (b)
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 9
1.5 NEED FOR BHAVANPADU PORT DEVELOPMENT
INDIAN PORT INDUSTRY
The Indian ports and shipping industry plays a crucial role in sustaining growth in the country's trade and
commerce and stands at 16th spot among the maritime countries. India has a long coastline of about
7,517 kilometres (km) with 13 major ports and 187 non-major ports currently operating on the western
and eastern coasts of the country. Major Indian ports handled 581.3 million metric tonnes (MMT) of
cargo in the financial year 2014-15, while non-major ports handled 471.2 MMT of cargo. Since ports
handle almost 95 per cent of trade volumes in India, the rising trade has contributed significantly to the
country’s cargo traffic. Indian government is planning to increase cargo capacity to 2,493.1 MMT by
2017 for supporting the growing demand. Similarly, the government will also increase cargo traffic at
major ports and non-major ports to 943.1 MMT and 815.2 MMT by FY17 respectively 2017 for
supporting the growing demand. Similarly, the government will also increase cargo traffic at major ports
and non-major ports to 943.1 MMT and 815.2 MMT by FY17 respectively.
Source: DPR
Based on the traffic handled at Indian major and non-major ports from 2001-02 to 2018-19, it can be
seen that the traffic growth of non-major ports is steady increasing over the last 19 years from 96.27 to
581.22 million tons with average growth rate of 6.7%. The percentage share of non-major ports in traffic
in over all traffic handled at Indian ports is also steadily increasing from 25.08% in 2001-02 to 45.4% in
2018-19.
PORTS IN ANDHRA PRADESH
Large ports are namely the Visakhapatnam Port, Gangavaram Port, Krishnapatnam port and Kakinada
Deep Water Port. Visakhapatnam Port is India’s largest cargo handling port with handling capacity of 65
Million Metric Tonnes Per Annum (MMTPA). Gangavaram Port is India’s deepest port with 21 m draft
and automated handling. Its present capacity is 35 MMTPA and ultimate capacity is 200 MMTPA.
Kakinada Deep Water Port has four berths with 12 MMTPA handling capacity having 13 metres draft.
Krishnapatnam port with a deep draft of 21 m is bulk handling port with ultra-modern cargo handling
facilities.
Among all states in India, Gujarat state occupies the top slot of 399 million tons handled in 2018-19
followed by Andhra Pradesh with 103.333 million tons, but the gap is huge. The percentage share of
Gujarat ports in cargo handling is more than 68% whereas the next highest share of Andhra Pradesh is
only 17.8 %. The east coast ports in Tamil Nadu handles the cargo of 0.963 million tons and Odisha ports
handles 22.186 million tons.
Due to development of coastal shipping for movement of bulk cargo, higher coastal shipment of coal by
100 million tonne per annum (MTPA) and higher coastal shipment of other commodities (cement, steel,
fertiliser, food grains, POL) by 50 MTPA" alone could result in savings to the tune of Rs 11,500 crore by
2025, according to Sagarmala project. Building of new coastal capacities for 120 MTPA steel and cement
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 10
in southern Gujarat, Central Andhra Pradesh, northern Karnataka, Odisha and northern Andhra Pradesh
would result in savings of another Rs 8,500 crore.
Source: DPR
BHAVANAPADU PORT SCENARIO
The competitive ports for Bhavanapadu are Visakhapatnam and Gangavaram on the south along Andhra
Pradesh coastline and Gopalpur and Paradip on the north along Odisha coastline. Potential cargo
competition from Paradip port can be for the cargo generated through Central Chhattisgarh region and
Central Odisha. These areas do not fall in any mineral rich cluster of the states. The upcoming power
plants, graphite and alumina deposits can act as cargo demand centers for Bhavanapadu port.
Vishakhapatnam bound cargo emanating from Northern Odisha mines can be captured by upcoming
Gopalpur port and newly proposed Bhavanapadu. Further, the possibility diversion of cargo from
Southern Odisha and South Chhattisgarh is more to Bhavanapadu port because of its proximity, when
compared to Vishakhapatnam port. The containerization level of the hinterland is lower than the
country average. And the ports on the east coast do have capacity problems. For Bhavanapadu there are
great opportunities in this market. Due to economic growth break bulk has an increasing market and
gives opportunities to Bhavanapadu. Iron ore and fertilizer are industries which show a growth in the
whole area. The direct hinterland of Bhavanapadu has several producers and customers for these
products. Alumina and other minerals are expecting to have a large growth, and are closer to the
Bhavanapadu port then the existing ports; this also means a good opportunity for Bhavanapadu
The classification of districts near Bhavanapadu into primary, secondary and tertiary hinterland is done
as per the logistical advantages offered by Bhavanapadu port as well as the proximity with other
competing ports in the region.
The primary hinterland of Bhavanapadu covers Vizianagaram District and Srikakulam District in Andhra
Pradesh. The primary hinterland has a low population density and little industrial activity. The secondary
hinterland covers Chattisgarh, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh and Southern Odisha sharing boarder with
Andhra Pradesh and located in close proximity with Bhavanapadu. The primary and secondary
hinterlands of Bhavanapadu port are shown in Figure 1.7.
The tertiary hinterland covers all the neighbouring states, as well as northern states. The secondary and
the distant hinterland is relative large because of the good hinterland connections. The existing ports
along east coast and the existing ports along Andhra coast in close proximity to each other difficult to
demarcation of the hinterland of each port and overlapping is inevitable to some extent. Hence,
competition among the ports is inescapable.
Bhavanapadu is situated close to the major port of Visakhapatnam. Geographically, Bhavanapadu is
located in an advantage position close to the border stages of Odisha, Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand and
Madhya Pradesh States. Hence, the traffic from the close proximity States of Chhattisgarh, Odisha,
Jharkhand and Madhya Pradesh may also be attracted to Bhavanapadu. Paradip Port is located in Odisha
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 11
but because of the congested traffic the Proposed Port may be opted. However, attraction of the cargo
also depends upon the efficiency of the port operations, infrastructure facilities available at the ports.
Thus, development of Bhavanapadu Port is justifiable in terms cargo handling advantages.
Figure 1.7: Bhavanapadu Port Hinterland
1.6 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT DEVELOPMENT
Greenfield multipurpose port of Bhavanapadu I planned in multiple phases and Phase I development
plan is given in Table 1.3.
Table 1.3: Proposed Bhavanapadu Port Phase I Development S. No. Item Description
1. Port Location The proposed Greenfield port land falls under villages of Mulapeta, Rajapuram, Kothalingudu of Santhabommali Mandal, District Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh.
2. Land area for development
1010 acres (Port Development – 825.08 acres and External Connectivity – 184.92 acres)
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 12
S. No. Item Description
3. Cargo Handling capacity ~23.53 MTPA for Phase I 83.3 MTPA for Phase II
4. Cargo type Iron ore, coal, lime stone, container cargo, edible oil, general cargo such as mineral sand, iron and steel products, fertilizers, granite, ferro products, jute products and food products such as soya and cashew.
5. Capital Dredging 14 million cu.m
6. Maintenance Dredging 2 million cu.m
7. Cargo berths Four berths; Three General Cargo berths and One Coal Handling berth
8. Breakwaters 2855m long South Breakwater 580m long North Breakwater
9. Approach channel Length 2200 m; width 225m; 19.2 m depth below CD
10. Turning Circle Diameter 575m; 18.4 m depth below CD
11. Cargo storage Stockyards will be developed - Total Storage area is 157.77 acres in Phase I
12. Project Cost Project Cost for Phase I - INR 3091.90 Crores
13. Employment Generation ~10,000 in terms of Direct and Indirect
1.7 EIA STUDY
In order to obtain prior Environmental Clearance from statutory authorities for proposed construction of
the Bhavanapadu port, Form 1 and ToR application was submitted to MoEF&CC and ToR was accorded
vide F.No. 10-56/2020-IA.III [Proposal No. IA/AP/MIS/173542/2020] dated September 01, 2021 and
enclosed as Annexure 1.1. The EIA study has been carried out as per approved Terms of Reference (ToR)
obtained from MoEF&CC.
1.8 TERMS OF REFERENCE (TOR) COMPLIANCE
The compliance to ToR is given in Table 1.4.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 13
Table 1.4: Compliance of ToR S.
No. TOR Point Compliance
Specific TOR
1 Forest Clearance shall be obtained for accessing the RoW APMB will obtain forest clearance from the state , the area is less than 5 ha (Status of FC)
2 The ecologically fragile area including CRZ 1A area etc. shall be demarcated and superimposed on the layout plan and submitted with a copy of layout superimposed on the HTL/LTL map demarcated on 1:4000 scales prepared by an authorized agency as per CRZ Notification (2011)
Draft Maps is provided in the report and final Maps has been provide after ground truthing
3 Risk analysis and its management plan for handling different types of liquid cargos (if handling)
shall be conducted and submitted
Detailed in Chapter-7 (Section 7.2)
Handling different types of cargos detailed in chapter 2.
4 Detailed modelling studies to understand whether the selected site can withstand severe cyclones
and develop design in accordance to due safety measures.
Detailed in Chapter-2
5 Erosion and accretion study at the mouth of the creek which is adjacent to the proposed site be
carried out and submitted.
Will be submitted at the time of finalizing the report
6 Comprehensive study on the sea level rise (based on the recent Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change (IPCC) predictions), its impact on coast and coastal erosion and port viability should
be done.
Will be complied
7 Importance and benefits of the project Detailed in Chapter-8
8 Submit a copy of layout superimposed on the HTL/LTL map demarcated by an authorized agency
on 1:4000 scales
Will be provided at the time of finalizing the report
9 Recommendation of the AP CZMA shall be obtained and submitted Awaiter from SCZMA
10 Submit superimposing of latest CZMP as per CRZ Notification (2011) on the CRZ map. Will be provided at the time of finalizing the report
11 Submit a complete set of documents required as per para 4.2 (i) of CRZ Page 7 of 13 Notification,
2011
Will be complied
12 Hydrodynamics study on impact of dredging on flow characteristics shall be carried out. Detaled in Chapter 4 (4.3.2) 13 A detailed study on the impact of proposed activity on marine ecology and marine biodiversity with
specific focus on the corals, mangroves and Mud flats in the proximity of the site should be
conducted and required mitigation plan be submitted.
Detailed in Chapter 4
14 A management plan for the area under which mangroves are or likely to be removed and
compensatory mangrove plantation plan be submitted
Detailed in Chapter 10 (Section 10.3)
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 14
S. No.
TOR Point Compliance
15 Requirement of water, power, with source of supply, status of approval, water balance diagram,
man-power requirement (regular and contract).
Detailed in Chapter-2
16 A certificate from the local body supplying water, specifying the total annual water availability with
the local authority, the quantity of water already committed the quantity of water allotted to the
project under consideration and the balance water available. This hould be specified separately for
ground water and surface water sources, ensuring that there is no impact on other users.
Detailed in Chapter 10
17 A certificate of adequacy of available power from the agency supplying power to the project along with the load allowed for the project.
Will be inclosed
18 A certificate from the competent authority handling municipal solid wastes, indicating the existing
civic capacities of handling and their adequacy to cater to the M.S.W. generated from project.
Will be inclosed
19 An assessment of the cumulative impact of all development and increased inhabitation being
carried out or proposed to be carried out by the project or other agencies in the core area, shall be
made for traffic densities and parking capabilities in a 05 kms radius from the site. A detailed traffic
management and a traffic decongestion plan drawn up through an organization of repute and
specializing in Transport Planning shall be submitted with the EIA.
Detailed in Chapter 4
20 A comprehensive plan for disaster management and mitigation be developed taking in to account
the products, processes and hazardous waste management and disposal if any. The plan should
also include financial provisions for the same and integrate these within EIA/EMP.
Detailed in Chapter-7 (Section 7.2)
21 Details and status of court case pending against the project, if any. Not applicable
22. Public hearing to be conducted and issues raised and commitments made by the project proponent
on the same should be included in EIA/EMP Report in the form of tabular chart with financial
budget for complying with the commitments made.
Has been complied
23. A tabular chart with index for point-wise compliance of above ToRs. The specific ToRs as
recommended above are in addition to all the relevant information as per the ‘Generic Structure of
EIA’ given in Appendix III and IIIA in the EIA Notification, 2006.
Page No: 13-18
24. As per the Ministry’s Office Memorandum F. No. 22-65/2017-IA.III dated 30th September, 2020,
the project proponent, based on the commitments made during Page 8 of 13 the public hearing,
specific studies as stated in paras (xiv) and (xv) shall include all the activities required to be taken to
fulfill these commitments in the Environment Management Plan along with cost estimates of these
activities, in addition to the activities proposed as per recommendations of EIA Studies and the
Has been complied
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 15
S. No.
TOR Point Compliance
same shall be submitted to the ministry as part of the EIA Report. The EMP shall be implemented
at the project cost or any other funding source available with the project proponent.
25 In pursuance of Ministry's OM No. stated above, the project proponent shall add one annexure in
the EIA Report indicating all the commitments made by the PP to the public during public hearing
and submit it to the Ministry and the EAC.
Has been complied
Standard TOR
1 Reasons for selecting the site with details of alternate sites examined/rejected/selected on merit
with comparative statement and reason/basis for selection. The examination should justify site
suitability in terms of environmental angle, resources sustainability associated with selected site as
compared to rejected sites. The analysis should include parameters considered along with
weightage criteria for short-listing selected site.
Detailed in Chapter-5
2 Details of the land use break-up for the proposed project. Details of land use around 10 km radius
of the project site. Examine and submit detail of land use around 10 km radius of the project site
and map of the project area and 10 km area from boundary of the proposed/existing project area,
delineating project areas notified under the wild life (Protection) Act, 1972/critically polluted areas
as identified by the CPCB from time to time/notified eco-sensitive areas/interstate boundaries and
international boundaries. Analysis should be made based on latest satellite imagery for land use
with raw images.
Detailed in Chapter-2 and 3.3.6 of chapter 3
3 Submit the present land use and permission required for any conversion such as forest, agriculture
etc. land acquisition status, rehabilitation of communities/ villages and present status of such
activities.
Has been complied chapter 4 section 4.3.1
4 Examine and submit the water bodies including the seasonal ones within the corridor of impacts
along with their status, volumetric capacity, and quality likely impacts on them due to the project.
Has been complied in Chapter-4
5 Submit a copy of the contour plan with slopes, drainage pattern of the site and surrounding area. Chapter-2 (Section 2..4.1)
6 Submit the details of terrain, level with respect to MSL, filling required, source of filling materials
and transportation details etc.
Chapter 3 (Section 3.3)
7 Examine road/rail connectivity to the project site and impact on the existing traffic network due to
the proposed project/activities. A detailed traffic and transportation study should be made for
existing and projected passenger and cargo traffic.
Detailed in Chapter-2 (Section 2.7)
8 Submit details regarding R&R involved in the project Detailed in Chapter-7
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 16
S. No.
TOR Point Compliance
9 Submit a copy of layout superimposed on the HTL/LTL map demarcated by an authorized agency
on 1:4000 scales along with the recommendation of the SCZMA.
Will be provided at the time of finalization the report
10 Submit the status of shore line change at the project site Will be provided at the time of finalization the report
11 Details of the layout plan including details of channel, breakwaters, dredging, disposal and
reclamation.
Has been complied in chapter 2 section (2.6.)
12 Details of handling of each cargo, storage, transport along with spillage control, dust preventive
measures. In case of coal, mineral cargo, details of storage and closed conveyance, dust
suppression and prevention filters.
Detailed in Chapter-2 (section 2.2.1)
13 Submit the details of fishing activity and likely impacts on the fishing activity due to the project.
Specific study on effects of construction activity and pile driving on marine life.
Will be provided at the time of finalizing the report
14 Details of oil spill contingency plan. Will be provided at the time of finalizing the report
15 Details of bathymetry study. Detailed in Chapter-2 (Section 2.4.1)
16 Details of ship tranquility study. Will be provided at the time of finalizing the report
17 Examine the details of water requirement, impact on competitive user, treatment details, use of
treated waste water. Prepare a water balance chart.
Deatiled in Chapter-2
18 Details of rainwater harvesting and utilization of rain water. Has been complied in the report
19 Examine details of Solid waste generation treatment and its disposal. Detailed in Chapter-2 (Section 2.8.6)
20 Details of desalination plant and the study for outfall and intake. Not Applicable
21 Examine baseline environmental quality along with projected incremental load due to the
proposed project/activities.
Detailed in Chapter-3
22 The air quality monitoring should be carried out according to the notification issued on 16th
November, 2009.
Detailed in Chapter-3
23 Examine separately the details for construction and operation phases both for Environmental
Management Plan and Environmental Monitoring Plan with cost and parameters.
Has been complied in chapter 6 and 10
24 Submit details of a comprehensive Risk Assessment and Disaster Management Plan including
emergency evacuation during natural and man-made disasters
Detailed in Chapter-7
25 Submit details of the trees to be cut including their species and whether it also involves any
protected or endangered species. Measures taken to reduce the number of the trees to be
removed should be explained in detail. Submit the details of compensatory plantation. Explore the
Detailed in Chapter-10 (Section 10.2 and Section 10.3)
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 17
S. No.
TOR Point Compliance
possibilities of relocating the existing trees.
26 Examine the details of afforestation measures indicating land and financial outlay. Landscape plan,
green belts and open spaces may be described. A thick green belt should be planned all around the
nearest settlement to mitigate noise and vibrations. The identification of species/ plants should be
made based on the botanical studies.
Detailed in Chapter-10
27 The Public Hearing should be conducted for the project in accordance with provisions of
Environmental Impact Assessment Notification, 2006 and the issues raised by the public should be
addressed in the Environmental Management Plan. The Public Hearing should be conducted based
on the TOR letter issued by the Ministry and not on the basis of Minutes of the Meeting available
on the web-site.
Will be provided at the time of finalizing the report
28 A detailed draft EIA/EMP report should be prepared in accordance with the above additional TOR
and should be submitted to the Ministry in accordance with the Notification.
Has been complied in the report
29 Details of litigation pending against the project, if any, with direction /order passed by any Court of
Law against the Project should be given.
Not applicable
30 The cost of the Project (capital cost and recurring cost) as well as the cost towards implementation
of EMP should be clearly spelt out.
Deatiled in Chappter-10 (Section 10.6.2)
General Conditions
1 Certified Compliance Report issued by the MoEF&CC, Regional Office or concerned Regional office
of Central Pollution Control Board or the Member Secretary of the respective State Pollution
Control Board for the project along with an action taken report on issues which have been stated
to be partially complied or non/not complied.
Will be complied
2 The project proponent shall satisfactorily address to all the complaints/suggestions that have been
received against the project till the date of submission of proposals for Appraisal. Will be complied
3 Details of Emissions, effluents, solid waste and hazardous waste generation and their management
in the existing and proposed facilities.
Has been complied in chapter 4 (section 4.4.7)
4 The existing project should avail of and submit consent to operate from the state pollution Control
Board. Will be complied
5 Wastewater Management Plan shall be prepared and submitted Has been complied in chapter 10 (Section 10.1.10)
6 Details of Environmental Monitoring Plan shall be submitted Will be complied
7 To prepare a detailed biodiversity impact assessment report and management plan through the Has been complied in chapter 3 and 4
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 18
S. No.
TOR Point Compliance
NIO or any other institute of repute on marine, brackish water and fresh water ecology and
biodiversity. The report shall study the impact on the rivers, estuary and the sea and include the
intertidal biotopes, corals and coral communities, molluscs, sea grasses , sea weeds, subtidal
habitats , fishes, other marine and aquatic micro , macro and mega flora and fauna including
benthos , plankton , turtles , birds etc. as also the productivity. The data collection and impact
assessment shall be as per standard survey methods.
8 The EIA would include a chapter on how the project conforms to the CRZ management plan being
drawn up by the State Government in Compliance to NGT orders. Will be complied
9 The EIA would include a chapter on how the projects conforms to the CRZ management plan being
drawn up by the State Government in compliance to NGT orders. Will be provideat thetime of finalizing the report
10 Plan for Corporate Environment Responsibility (CER) as specified under Ministry’s Office
Memorandum vide F. No. 22-65/2017-IA.III dated 30th September 2020 shall be prepared and
submitted along with EIA report.
Will be provideat thetime of finalizing the report
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 19
1.9 STRUCTURE OF THE EIA REPORT
The overall contents of the EIA report follow the list of contents prescribed in the Gazette Notification
on “Environmental Clearance” issued by Ministry of Environment & Forests, Govt. of India vide no. SO
1533 dated 14th September 2006 (as amended). The outline of the Report is given as below:
Chapter 1- Introduction: This chapter gives the brief description of nature, size, location of the project
and its importance to the country, region, need & objective of the study, Scope of the study, details of
applicable regulations etc.
Chapter 2- Project Description: The details of project location and development plan will be provided.
This chapter summarizes description of those aspect of project likely to cause environment effects.
Chapter 3- Description of the Environment: This chapter describes the Study area, methodology
adopted, establishment of baseline study for valued environmental, components, as identified in the
scope. The information presented in this chapter is based on primary as well as secondary data
collection.
Chapter 4- Anticipated Environmental Impacts: Prediction is essentially a process to forecast the future
environmental conditions of the project area that might be expected to occur as a result of the
construction and operation of the proposed port. Hence, anticipated positive and negative impacts likely
to accrue as a result of the construction and operation of the proposed project have been assessed in
this Chapter. An attempt has been made to predict future environmental conditions quantitatively to
the extent possible. But for certain parameters which cannot be quantified, general approach is
implemented to discuss such intangible impacts in qualitative terms so that
contractors/operators/stakeholders are aware of their existence as well as their possible implications.
Chapter 5- Analysis of Alternatives (Technology & Site): This chapter covers the details of various
alternatives in respect of both locations of site and technologies to be deployed to ensure sustainable
development under given conditions.
Chapter 6- Environment Monitoring Programme: Environmental Monitoring Programme for
implementation during project construction and operation phases has been delineated in this Chapter.
Chapter 7- Additional Studies (Risk and DMP): outlines the Risks associated with the project and
Disaster Management Plan, traffic and transportation management plan etc., is discussed in this
Chapter.
Chapter 8- Project Benefits: This chapter provides Improvements in the physical infrastructure,
Improvements in the social infrastructure, Employment potential –skilled; semi-skilled and unskilled,
other tangible benefits.
Chapter 9- Environmental Cost Benefit Analysis: This is not recommended in ToR granted by MoEF&CC.
Chapter 10- Environmental Management Plan: Environmental Management Plan (EMP) for anticipated
adverse impacts likely to accrue as a result of the proposed project. The approach for formulation of an
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 20
Environmental Management Plan (EMP) is to maximize the positive environmental impacts and
minimize the negative ones. After selection of suitable environmental mitigation measures, cost
required for implementation of various management measures is also estimated.
Chapter 11- Summary & Conclusion: This chapter include overall summary of the project and EIA study.
Chapter 12- Disclosure of the Consultant: The detailed profile of the consultants engaged along with
their capabilities, professional expertise and work experiences are highlighted in this chapter.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 21
CHAPTER 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 22
2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
2.1 LOCATION
The Greenfield Bhavanapadu Port is located south of Tekkali creek in Srikakulam District, Andhra
Pradesh. The waterfront to be developed for Phase I development of Bhavanapadu port is within the
declared port limits. The location of the port is given as Figure 1-2.
2.2 LAND AREA
Land area of 1010 acres (408.7 ha) with a waterfront of 10.3 km is allotted by GoAP for development of
Bhavanapadu port. Land comprises of cashew, casuarina, palm tree plantations, coastal sand, salt pans
and open scrub areas. The port site is sloped towards Bay of Bengal and elevation varies from 2.0 m to
13.0 m. Port Development is planned in an area of 825.08 acres and an area of 184.92 acres is required
for development external connectivity (road/rail corridor).
PROPOSED LAND USE OF PHASE I DEVELOPMENT
The proposed land use of Phase I development is given in Table 2.1.
Table 2.1: Phase I Development- Proposed Land Use
S.No Land Area In
Acres In Ha
A Cargo Storage Area 202.015 81.75
B Port administrative building, workshop 50.50 20.43
C Amenities (Canteen, Dispensary, rest shelters, recreation, banks, etc.) 40.40 16.34
D Roads/Truck parking/ Railways Line /weigh bridges/ Yard etc. 60.60 24.52
E Car parking at various buildings 10.10 4.08
F Roads and Utilities (Water Supply, Drainage, Sewer, Power Supply, Power Station, Maintenance Buildings, Security Complexes, Fire Station, Gate House, Conveyor, Pipelines etc.,)
60.60 24.52
G Berth backup area 20.00 8.09
H Land required for construction of transit sheds 40.40 16.34
I Parks/Open Space 80.63 32.63
J For future expansion 60.60 24.52
K Greenbelt Area 200.00 80.94
Sub-total 825.845 334.16
L Area for external infrastructure (Road and rail connectivity to port; Rail@ 15m RoW and Road @ 45m RoW)
184.0 74.5
Total 1010 408.7
2.3 PORT TRAFFIC
The detailed traffic projections have been made under two scenarios i.e., (i) Likely scenario, (ii)
Optimistic (High) scenario for Phase I development of Bhavanapadu Port and given in Table 2.2
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 23
Table 2.2: Traffic Projections for Bhavanapadu port
S.No Commodity 2024-25 (MTPA)
2029-30 (MTPA)
2034-35 (MTPA)
2039-40 (MTPA)
A Imports
1. Thermal coal 3.0 4.41 13.50 20.5
2. Domestic coal (coastal shipping) 4.20 11.72 14.4 20.4
3. Cocking coal 4.76 7.00 10.28 15.10
4. Raw cashew 0.47 0.57 0.69 0.84
5. Fertilizer 1.46 1.78 2.16 2.63
6. Lime stone 0.84 0.98 1.13 1.32
7. Edible Oil 1.02 1.50 2.20 3.24
8. Other cargo 0.20 0.27 0.39 0.54
9. SEZ (General cargo) 0.60 0.75
10. SEZ (Containers- MT) 0.60 0.75
11. Containers divertible (MT) 0.51 0.75
Sub-total of (A) 15.95 28.23 46.46 66.83
B Exports
12. Mineral sands 0.70 0.85 1.04 1.26
13. Iron Ore 3.25 3.59 3.96 4.37
14. Cashew Kernal 0.29 0.36 0.43 0.53
15. Soya meal 0.68 1.00 1.47 2.16
16. Granite 1.46 1.78 2.16 2.63
17. Ferro products / Alloys 0.35 0.43 0.52 0.63
18. Jute products 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.04
19. Iron and steel products 0.52 0.74 1.03 1.45
20. Iron and steel scrap 0.06 0.07 0.09 0.11
21. Other commodities 0.22 0.26 0.39 0.54
22. SEZ (General cargo) 1.00 1.25
23. SEZ (Containers- MT) 0.60 0.75
24. Containers divertible (MT) 0.60 0.75
Sub-total of (B) 7.56 9.12 13.33 16.47
Total 23.50 37.35 59.79 83.30
2.4 FIELD SURVEYS AND INVESTIGATIONS
Field surveys and investigations such as seabed surveys (viz. bathymetry, shallow seismic profiling),
Oceanographic measurements (wave measurements, current meter observations) and seabed
sediment/marine borehole sampling were carried for the planning and design of the proposed facilities
at Bhavanapadu port.
BATHYMETRY AT THE PROPOSED PORT LOCATION
The bathymetric survey of the coastal waters within port limits was conducted for the proposed
Bhavanapadu Port. The bathymetry charts indicate that the depth contours prevail almost parallel to the
coastline.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 24
The wave breaking zone is extended up to -2m contour from the shore line along Bhavanapadu coast.
The wave breaking zone is extended to about 150 m distance from the shore line. The -3 m contour is
located at 250 m, --5 m contour is about 380 m from the shoreline that is very close to the shore, -10 m
and -15 m contours are located at 910m and 1.92 km respectively away from the coastline. The deeper
contour of -20 m is about 4.05 km from the shoreline respectively from the shoreline. Bathymetry
contours are shown in Figure 2.1.
Figure 2.1: Bathymetric Data of Bhavanapadu Port
SHALLOW SEISMIC SURVEY ON SOUTH OF CREEK
The extent of seismic survey carried out is as given below:
A 18°33'.42.7113''N, 84°21'32.3406''E
B 18°33'10.5404''N, 84°24'08.0310''E
C 18°31'14.1552''N, 84°22'08.9597''E
D 18°31'47.0948''N, 84°19'34.4711''E
3
17
10
14
3
10
14
17
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 25
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 26
Figure 2.2: Seismic Survey details of the proposed outer Harbour Location
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 27
GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION
The geotechnical investigations have indicated that the subsurface profile consists of Silty Sands, Poorly
Graded sands, coarse sands, Soft Disintegrated Rock (SDR) & Hard Rock. Water table was encountered
at different depths as given in subsequent paragraphs. The borehole location map is also provided in
Figure 2-3 below:
Figure 2.3: Borehole Locations
TIDAL DATA
The variation of design tide levels with respect to Chart Datum (CD) for Kalingapatnam as given in
Hydrographic chart (No. 353) as given in Table 2.3 are relevant to Bhavanapadu coast. The tidal variation
during survey period is given in Figure 2.4.
Table 2.3: Tidal variation at Bhavanapadu coast
Tide Tide Level w.r.t. CD (m)
(Hydrographic Chart No.353)
Mean High water Spring 1.70m
Mean High Water Neap 1.30m
Mean Sea Level 1.00m
Mean Low water Neap 0.70m
Mean Low Water Spring 0.30m
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 28
Figure 2.4: Tidal variation during survey period
CURRENTS
The region experiences tidal current as well as longshore current due to wave breaking. According to
published literatures, the peak velocity of tidal current is 0.80m/s.
TOPOGRAPHY
The topographical survey charts are prepared covering an area of 2000 m along the coast, 1000 m in-
land in WGS 84 spheroid with UTM coordinates supplemented by Geographical coordinates indicating
the latitude and longitude. The ground elevations are represented above Chart Datum (CD). In order to
obtain the ground elevations w.r.t. MSL, the reported heights have to be reduced by 1.0 m. The
topographic map for land elevation and Land marks combined map for entire survey area prepared in
1:2500 scale in 12.5 m x 12.5 m grid is presented in Figure 2.5.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 29
Figure 2.5: Topo survey Map for Bhavanapadu Port (A)
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 30
Figure 2.6: Topo survey Map for Bhavanapadu Port (B)
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 31
Figure 2.7: Topo survey Map for Bhavanapadu Port (B)
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 32
2.5 MATHEMATICAL MODEL STUDIES
OFFSHORE WIND
The offshore wind speed (Ws) off Bhavanapadu coast is extracted from ECMWF (European Centre for
Medium Weather Forecasting) for the time period 01 Jan 1979 to 31 March 2020 and statistically
analysed to extract required parameters.
Figure 2.8: Typical offshore wind rose diagram – Bhavanapadu
The north east monsoon period is from end November to end February with predominantly
north easterly winds
The pre-monsoon period is from March to May usually, the period of the year when the winds
shift towards south westerly direction
The south-west monsoon is from middle of May up to middle of October with predominantly
south-westerly winds and cloudy weather and the rainy season
The post monsoon is from middle of October to end November with variable weather
WAVES
Deep water wave characteristics that the year may be divided into two distinct seasons – (i) March to
October, when the waves are mostly from within a sector between the S and W, the predominant
direction being SW and (ii) November to February, when the waves are mostly confined to a sector
between N and E, the predominant direction being NE. The waves are predominantly observed in 6s to 8s
period with the significant wave height ranges between 1m to 1.5 m. However, larger wave heights were
also observed.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 33
2.5.2.1 Nearshore Waves
The most predominant wave direction is from SSE (55%) and S (25%) during south west monsoon season
from March to October while it is from E (45%) and ENE (30%) during north east monsoon from
November to February. The most predominant wave direction is from SSE (55%) and S (25%) during south
west monsoon season from March to October while it is from E (45%) and ENE (30%) during north east
monsoon from November to February.
During the period March to October, that is, during south west monsoon season, the predominant wave
heights in the near shore waters are found to vary between 0.5 and 2.0 m. About 24% of the time the
waves are with height around 0.5 to 1.0 m range and 24% of the time the wave heights are around 1.0 to
1.5 m and again about 24% of the time the wave heights are around 1.5 to 2.0 m. The wave heights
exceeding 2.5 m are also most frequent of the order of about 26%. Wave heights smaller than 0.5 m are
totally absent. About 50% of the time the waves with period 8 sec and 10 sec are frequently approach the
near shore waters of the coast.
In the months November to February, that is, during north east monsoon season significant wave heights
between 0.5 and 1.0 m are found to be most frequent (34%). The wave heights exceeding 2.0 m (26%) are
also found which in fact are more important for design of coastal structures since the waves occur during
cyclone period. The wave heights may even exceed 3 m during the storm periods. The 8 sec and 10 sec
wave periods constitute about 40% of the time while less than 6 sec period also comprises around 25% of
the time.
Hydrodynamic Study
The study domain for the study is the Bhavanapadu coast for about 20 km stretch as shown in Figure 1.3
The domain of the study is represented by a number of bodies representing exterior coastal lines and
open coast. This is basically the geometric configuration of the coastal boundaries at Bhavanapadu coast
and the computational mesh used for simulation as projected in Figure 2.9. The bathymetry used is the
measured bathymetry. The bathymetry used for the study is projected in Figure 2.10. The final mesh has
fine elements near the coastlines and shallower water depths. The average mesh size found to be about
30-200 m. The mesh is coarser near the offshore and near the higher water depths. The interpolated
bathymetry shows the contours at regular intervals in Figure 2.11. The tidal levels are extracted from the
TPXO data for the open boundaries. The tidal elevation at the boundary with a tidal range of 0.6-0.9m is
shown in Figure 2.12. The detailed numerical model studies for every 15 days have been carried out to
investigate the hydrodynamics, covering the Spring-Neap variations of Astronomical tides.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 34
Figure 2.9: Computational mesh generated from the boundary curve
Figure 2.10: Bathymetry represented in the computational mesh
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 35
Figure 2.11: Bathymetry interpolated with the computational mesh
Figure 2.12: Tidal Elevation Range in the Boundary for 15 day time period
2.5.3.1 Results and discussions
2.5.3.1.1 Simulated tidal conditions
Generally, the tidal elevation in the harbour basin is characterized by inflow and outflow of water during
flooding and ebbing. The flooding and ebbing phase for different flow fields is obtained in order to
measure the magnitude of velocity. For the purpose of easy referencing of the hydrodynamics with the
tide levels, typical time instances during which flow patterns have been extracted are shown in Figure
2.13. The origin is at mean sea level.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 36
Figure 2.13: Times of tide at which results are plotted
The hydrodynamics for the proposed berths at Bhavanapadu region for every 15 days is conducted and
the flow fields at different time intervals are given in Figure 2.26 to 2.31 and Figure 2.32 to 2.37 for case I
and case II, respectively. An unstructured meshing scheme was selected in order to predict the
hydrodynamics as accurate as possible by catching the adjoining shoreline and tidal boundaries in best
possible way.
S.No Case Number Description
1 Case-I South-West Monsoon Condition
2 Case-II North-East Monsoon Condition
2.5.3.1.2 Hydrodynamic study for Case-I
Flooding tide
The patterns during flooding condition of the site are shown in Figure 2.14 and Figure 2.15. The results
show a typical flow situation commencing with the rising tide (at about 0 hr.) from which the magnitudes
of current at various locations in the study area can be detected. The flooding phase of the tide is
characterized with flow in the South-Westerly direction and North-Westerly direction during ebbing. The
velocity range is 0.1-0.2 m/s in the approach channel. During the peak flooding, the velocity in the areas
adjacent to northern and southern breakwaters inside Harbour reaches a maximum of 0.65 m/s. The
maximum magnitude of velocity during peak flooding in the turning circle area is 0.1-0.2 m/s. The low
velocity attained inside the channel area is understood by the fact that the depth is more along the
approach channel.
Ebbing tide
During the ebbing phase of the tide, which is followed by the occurrence of high tide, the tide starts
flowing in north-easterly direction into the open sea and with a magnitude in the range of 0.1-0.16 m/s in
the navigational channel as can be seen in the results of Figure 2.17. During the low tide, the entire
Harbour region become devoid of currents and prominent eddies (Figure 2.18) with some reversal
currents with high velocity up to about 0.7 m/s at the locations near northern and southern breakwaters
inside Harbour area (Figure 2.19).
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 37
Figure 2.14: Velocity contour and vector plot during raising tide at 0 hrs for Case I
Figure 2.15: Velocity contour and vector plot during raising tide at 1.5 hrs for Case I
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 38
Figure 2.16: Velocity contour and vector plot during high tide at 3.1 hrs for Case I
Figure 2.17: Velocity contour and vector plot during ebbing tide at 6.2 hrs for Case I
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 39
Figure 2.18: Velocity contour and vector plot during low tide at 9.3 hrs for Case I
Figure 2.19: Velocity contour and vector plot during raising tide at 12.4 hrs for Case I
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 40
2.5.3.1.3 Hydrodynamic study for Case-II
Flooding tide
The patterns during flooding condition of the site are shown in Figure 2.20 to Figure 2.22. The results
show a typical flow situation commencing with the rising tide (at about 0 hr) from which the magnitudes
of current at various locations in the study area can be deduced. The phase of the tide is characterized
with flow in the South-Westerly direction during flooding and North-Westerly direction during ebbing,
respectively.
The velocity range is 0.1-0.2 m/s in the approach channel during flooding. During the peak flooding, the
current velocity in the areas adjacent to northern and southern breakwaters inside Harbour reaches a
maximum of 0.65 m/s. The maximum magnitude of velocity during peak flooding in the tuning circle area
is 0.1-0.2 m/s. The low velocity attained inside the Harbour area is understood by the fact that the depth
is more along the approach channel.
Ebbing tide
During the ebbing phase of the tide, which is followed by the occurrence of high tide, the tide starts
flowing in the north-easterly direction in to the open sea and with a magnitude in the range of 0.1-0.16
m/s in the navigational channel as depicted in Figure 2.23. During the low tide, the entire Harbour region
become devoid of currents and prominent eddies (Figure 2.24) with some reversal currents with high
velocity up to about 0.7 m/s at the locations near northern and southern breakwaters inside Harbour
area (Figure 2.25). The overall current movement is more prominent near the Harbour entrance and
breakwaters.
Figure 2.20: Velocity contour and vector plot during raising tide at 0 hrs for Case II
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 41
Figure 2.21: Velocity contour and vector plot during raising tide at 1.5 hrs for Case II
Figure 2.22: Velocity contour and vector plot during high tide at 3.1 hrs for Case II
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 42
Figure 2.23: Velocity contour and vector plot during ebbing tide at 6.2 hrs for Case II
Figure 2.24: Velocity contour and vector plot during low tide at 9.3 hrs for Case II
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 43
Figure 2.25: Velocity contour and vector plot during raising tide at 12.4 hrs for Case II
Model Studies for Wave Tranquillity
For safe berthing of ships and smooth operations of loading and unloading of cargo, tranquillity
conditions are maintained from the open sea wave disturbances by providing shelter and construction of
breakwaters. Hence this study aims at providing an in-depth analysis on the wave tranquillity at
Bhavanapadu coast. The Model study for wave tranquillity carried out through IIT Madras. The foregoing
model studies have resulted in identifying feasible and optimum layout with south breakwater of length
2735 m and north breakwater of length 592 m to arrive tranquillity within the proposed harbour at
Bhavanapadu is suitable for port operations.
2.5.4.1 Design wave conditions for extreme wave
The wave tranquility models run for the extreme wave conditions of cyclones for the selected port layout
for different wave directions of wave approaches are shown in Figure 2.27 to Figure 2.29.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 44
Figure 2.26: Port Layout –Channel Aligned North East (NE) Direction
Wave Tranquility Model Run for Extreme Wave Conditions tested during one severe cyclone under 1:200
years Return period for different directions of wave approaches.
Figure 2.27: Wave height distribution for extreme waves from South (S)
Tranquility run for Extreme wave conditions 1 in 200 wave climates for the offshore waves from south.
Wave heights within the Harbour basin are <0.4 m.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 45
Figure 2.28: Wave height distribution for extreme waves from South East (SE)
Tranquility run for Extreme wave conditions 1 in 200 wave climate for the offshore for the offshore waves
from south east Wave heights within the Harbour basin are <0.4m.
Figure 2.29: Wave height distribution for extreme waves from East (E)
Tranquility run for Extreme wave conditions 1 in 200 wave climate for the offshore waves from East Wave
heights within the Harbour basin are <0.6m.
TSUNAMI
Due to the location of rupture directivity effects of tsunamis originating from Andaman faulty region,
tsunami is prone in the Bay of Bengal which would increase the water levels along east coast of India. By
considering different tsunami genic sources by Roshan et. Al., (2016) (Natural Hazards, 2016, vol. 82,
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 46
p.733), the tsunami water level variation along different coastal stretches of Indian Coast is defined.
Hazard map depicting expected mean tsunami water levels along east coast of India is shown in the figure
below. The expected maximum tsunami water level variation along the Bhavanapadu coastal stretch
ranges from 3 to 5m. Hazard map depicting expected mean tsunami water levels along the Bhavanapadu
coastal stretch is given in Figure 2.30.
Figure 2.30: Hazard map depicting expected mean tsunami water levels along the
Bhavanapadu coastal stretch
2.6 PHASE I DEVELOPMENT
Phase I development of Bhavanapadu Port is proposed for handling 23.5 MTPA with four berths and
required port infrastructure facilities. Phase I development layout is given as Figure 1.3.
CARGO HANDLING CAPACITY
Table 2.4: Cargo Handling Capacity
S.No Commodity Capacity (MTPA)
1. Coal 11.96
2. Lime stone 0.84
3. Iron Ore 3.25
4. Edible Oil 1.02
5. Multipurpose/general cargo 6.02
6. Other cargo 0.41
Total Phase I Capacity 23.50
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 47
DESIGN VESSEL SIZES AND DIMENSIONS
Considering various factors, the size of ships likely to call at Bhavanapadu port has been worked out.
Though in the initial phase, it is presumed that the Panamax type ships will be catered, to attract traffic
and to handle cargo arrived in cape size vessels, up to about 1,20,000 DWT vessels, adequate draft in the
initial phased itself is facilitated. This will also aid to handle sizeable quantum of coal and containers
arrived in capsize vessels. Based on the above consideration, ship sizes together with their main
dimensions taken for planning purposes are given in Table 2.5 and Table 2.6.
The cape size vessels of size 180000 DWT with dry bulk commodities, (especially for coal) are likely to call
on the port at a later Phase. To handle such larger vessel in the basin, the berthing structure, especially
the coal berth needs to be designed in the initial phase itself, and accordingly designs are carried out. The
ships likely to call on the port at Master Plan level as indicated in Table 2.6.
Table 2.5: Ship sizes expected at the Port in Phase I
Cargo Average Vessel Size (DWT)
Design Vessel Dimension
Length
(m)
Beam
(m)
Max.Draft
(m)
Coal (Import) 120000 270 41.0 16.0
Fertilizer and Food grains 50000 225 32.2 13.0
Other General Cargo, Iron ore, cement and granites
30000 195 29.0 11.5
Table 2.6: Design considerations made for ship sizes expected at the Port (Master Plan)
Cargo Average Vessel Size (DWT)
Design Vessel Dimension
Length
(m)
Beam
(m)
Max. Draft
(m)
Coal (Import) 180000 287 44.50 17.10
Fertilizer and Food grains 50000 225 32.2 13.0
Other General Cargo, Iron ore, cement and granites
80000 240 36.50 14.20
DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS
The design ship considered is of 180,000 DWT vessels of 287m long for coal berth. These ships are
considered to be having drafts of up to 17.10 m. It is usual for this class of ships to be used as Coal and/ or
Container carriers. For general cargo berths, the continuous berths are provided with 14.20 m draft, and
the maximum vessel size of 240m LOA, beam of 36.5m and 14.0m draft is considered for conceptual
designs. The proposed dredge depths are optimized for the design ships in accordance with IS-4651 Part
(V). The dredge depths thus finalized are: Approach channel: -19.20 CD, turning circle: -18.40 and near
berths -17.60 for coal berth and -15.5 for other berths.
Table 2.7: Design Consideration
Average Vessel Size (DWT)
Design Vessel Dimension Tuning Circle Dia (m)
Dredge Level (w.r.t CD)
Length (m)
Beam (m)
Max. Draft (m)
Approach channel
Turning Circle
At berths
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 48
Average Vessel Size (DWT)
Design Vessel Dimension Tuning Circle Dia (m)
Dredge Level (w.r.t CD)
Length (m)
Beam (m)
Max. Draft (m)
Approach channel
Turning Circle
At berths
180000 287 44.50 17.10 575 -20.52 -19.67 -18.81
80000 240 36.5 14.2 575 -20.52 -19.67 -15.50
At general cargo berths, the dredged depth provided is -15.5m, with which Panamax type vessels can also
be handled at General Cargo berths in case of need arise.
NAVIGATIONAL REQUIREMENTS
Navigational parameters are of at most importance in the development of a port. The vessel should be
provided with the required width, depth and space for safe maneuvering. For the proposed deepening of
harbour and channel, navigational parameters required to cater the design vessel needs to be estimated.
The navigational parameters consist of the following:
Approach Channel
Manoeuvring and Berthing area
Turning circle
Stopping distance
Navigational aids
2.6.4.1 Design of Navigational Channel
The harbour opening width is kept as 440 m in between the mouth of north and south breakwaters to
cater to fit the navigational channel considering the overall development of the port and future
requirements, if any.
Length of the channel is 2200 m
As per guidelines of IS 4651 Part V, the minimum width of the channel for two-way navigation is from
5.1 to 8 times the beam. Hence, the channel width is provided as 225 m.
The widening of the channel shall be made with a slope of 1:5.
2.6.4.2 Turning Circle
The turning Circle is provided with a diameter of 575m. According to IS 4651-part V, the minimum
diameter of the turning circle should be 1.7 to 2.0 times the length of the largest vessel called on the port.
The diameter is 1.74 times length of the largest ship expected at the port. The navigation channel is
aligned with the turning circle such that the inner line (western wing) of the navigation channel must
coincide with the Centre point of the turning circle.
BED LEVEL OF CHANNEL
A net Under Keel Clearance (UKC) must be available depending on the nature of sea bottom (whether
hard or soft) by allowing additional depths of water over and above the fully laden Draft of the largest
vessel to be serviced in that area. As per IS 4651, the UKC needs to be provided as percentage of the fully
laden draught of vessel to be serviced as follows.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 49
Outer channel/Un sheltered water - 20%
Protected maneuvering areas/berths - 10%
Turning Basin - 15%
In accordance with the above referred norms, the UKC and water depth requirements at the various
locations are worked out and as given in Figure 2.10.
Table 2.8: Water Depths in the Channel
Vessel Size (Dwt) Fully Laden Draft (M)
UKC and Water Depth Requirements (M)
Approach Channel Berths Turning Circle
UKC Depth UKC Depth Depth
120000 16.00 3.20 19.20 1.60 17.60 18.40
180000 (Ph-II) 17.10 3.42 20.60 1.71 18.90 19.70
BERTHING FACILITIES
Bhavanapadu port initially requires four commercial berths i.e, one to handle coal and another three
berths to handle other general cargo. According to IS- 4651 Part- V, the dimensions of the berth are
shown in Figure 2.11.
Table 2.9: Dimension of Vessel vs Berths
Berth
Dimension of Vessel Dimensions of Berth
Length (m) Approach channel
Length (in m)
Width (in m)
Coal Berth 287 44.50 345 27.85
General Cargo Berth 225 32.2 270 34.00
BREAKWATER
Based on the design waves of various return periods, design wave characteristics viz., Significant wave
height (Hs) and Mean time Period (Tm), wave tranquillity model studies, two breakwaters viz., South
Breakwater of Length 2855 m and North Breakwater of length 580 m is proposed to be developed. For
the north breakwater, the present bed level varies steeply along the alignment of the breakwater and
ended up at a depth of -6.0 m CD. In case of south breakwater, major portion is stretched diagonal to
contour line and is located at a deeper depth around (-) 9.0m to (-) 12.0m CD contour line.
Generally, breakwater structure construction consists of mainly four layers of stones. The four layers with
different stones consist of armour layer, toe mound, core layer and bedding layer. For construction of
breakwaters of Bhavanapadu Port, about 1.0 Mm3 of stones required. Srikakulam district (adjacent to the
port area), Tekkali town which are in the vicinity of proposed Bhavanapadu port location are having a
number of stone quarries. The stone available in these quarries are suitable for construction of Break
water. Jarjangi in Narasannapeta mandal in Srikakulam district is about 30 km away from the port
location.
Tekkali is also full of stone mines consisting of stones/boulders usable for construction of break water.
This area is about 25 to 30 km away from the Port location. Coarse Aggregate for Concrete & Road Metal
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 50
are located in Srikakulam District. The contractor has to bring the materials from about 30 km away to the
port location. Concrete blocks can be fabricated locally.
DREDGING, DISPOSAL AND RECLAMATION
2.6.8.1 Capital Dredging
The proposed dredging estimation is given in the below Figure 2.12 and the estimated dredging
quantities of Phase I is given in the Figure 2.13.
Table 2.10: Proposed Dredging Estimation For the proposed Port layout on the south of Creek
Vessel Size in DWT 120000 DWT
Dredging quantity (Million cum- Mm3) 14.000
Table 2.11: Estimated Dredging Quantities of Phase-I for ship size 1,20,000 DWT
Dredging Area Total Quantity (Mm3)
Total Quantity at proposed berth location (Mm3) 4.617
Total Quantity for approach channel (Mm3) 4.956
Total Quantity at turning basin (Mm3) 3.859
Additional Area (Mm3) 0.508
Total Quantity (Mm3) = 14
For capital dredging for the Port, considering the site conditions, it is felt that the most suitable type of
dredger is the TSHD. This dredger can easily operate in the exposed conditions experienced in this area. It
can dredge the medium dense to dense silty sand, load the dredged material in its hopper and dump it at
selected offshore disposal location. For inner channel and harbour areas it is felt that CSD will be the right
choice. Thus both TSHB and CSD will have to be deployed for capital dredging at the port. Alternatively, a
trailing suction hopper dredger with pump ashore facilities as considered adequate to carry out the total
dredging quantity.
A trailing suction hopper dredger (TSHD) with a hopper capacity of around 15,000cum is proposed to be
used to accomplish the work within the envisaged time frame.
2.6.8.2 Reclamation and Disposal
Nearly 14 Mm3 of capital dredged material will be used for raising the backup area and remaining 2Mm3
will be disposed in offshore area identified based on model studies.
2.6.8.3 Maintenance Dredging
Maintenance Dredging as dipected in DPR is 2Mm3
CARGO HANDLING
Main commodities to be handled are coal, iron ore, containers, limestone and general cargo. For handling
the coal, unloading facility of two numbers of 2500 TPH ship unloaders with connecting conveyor system
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 51
will be developed in initial phase. Coal berth is proposed to be mechanised. The following is the
equipment planned for cargo handling.
Table 2.12: Equipment for Cargo Handling Equipment Numbers
Coal Berth
Belt Conveyors with metal detector and weigher m, 1
Ship unloader- 2500 TPH 2
Stacker Reclaimer (5000 TPH stacking/ 2500 TPH reclaiming) 2
Rapid loading system- 4000 TPH 1
Pay loader (3Cum loader bucket capacity with operating weight 5000kg) 8
General Cargo
Harbour Mobile crane LHM 400 3X2
Fork lift truck 5T 3X4
Tractor trailer 3X8
Front end loader 3X2
CARGO STORAGE
Storage area required for the imports and exports of cargo in the initial phase is 33.32 ha (82.27 acres)
and for ultimate phase it is 171.11 ha (422.85 acres).
NAVIGATIONAL AIDS
The details of all the navigational aids required including, channel marking buoys, leading lights and other
safety measures such as fire-fighting plans are proposed in phase I development. The navigational aids
proposed are channel marking buoys (20 nos.), vessel traffic management information system of 1 no.
and 100 T weigh bridge of 2 no. will be deployed in the initial phase.
PORT CRAFT
The proposed port would require tugs for safe movement and maneuvering of ships calling at the port,
pilot launches, mooring boats and a mooring buoy for pilot services, mooring and survey operations.
These crafts could be procured initially on long term lease basis and subsequently may be owned by the
port. For the initial stage, 2 numbers of 75T bollard pull tugs are required. In year 2034-35, additional 2
numbers of 50T bollard pull would be needed.
2.7 CONNECTIVITY
EXISTING HINTERLAND CONNECTIVTY
2.7.1.1 Road
National Highway 5 or NH-5/NH-16 which is of 460m length connects Nizamabad in Telangana and
Jagdalpur in Chhattisgarh. It passes through the states of Telangana, Maharashtra and Chhattisgarh. NH-5
is located at a distance of 14 km from proposed Bhavanapadu Port.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 52
2.7.1.2 Rail
The Chennai - Kolkata broad gauge (BG) main lane passes about 7kms from Bhavanapadu at Naupada
Junction. There is a 90 km long branch-line from Naupada Junction up to Gunpur in Odisha which has
been converted into broad gauge in 2011-12. Government of Andhra Pradesh is also planning a beach
road connecting Tada to Ichchapuram approximately 1000 Km along the coastal corridor.
From Gunpur to Singapuram Road the railway link to be established reduce the railway length by abound
90 km from the mines in Odisha.
DEDICATED ROAD/RAIL CORRIDOR
2.7.2.1 Road
The road connectivity to port is proposed with a new road with 2 lane / 4 lane / 6 lane as per the port
expansion requirement. Four lane road is suggested for Phase – 1 development of the port from NH 5 to
Port premises boundary. The design criterion for 4-Lane road is as follows:
Width of right of way : 45 m
Median : 4 m
Carriageway : 7 m on either side (14 m)
Paved shoulder : 1.5 m on either side (3m)
Earthen shoulder : 2.0 m on either side (4 m)
Embankment : slope 1:2 and 1:1
Drain : 1.5 m on either side (3 m)
Greenery : Variable
Utilities : 2 m on either side (4 m)
Wearing Coat : Bituminous Concrete
Bituminous Base Layer : Dense Bituminous Macadam
The design cross section for 4 lane road is below:
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 53
2.7.2.2 Rail
Bhavanapadu Port Rail Connectivity is proposed from Naupada Station situated on Chennai - Howrah
route of Walter Division of East Coast Railway. Naupada is located at about 7 km from the proposed
Bhavnapadu port site. In the initial stage, one dedicated railway siding for coal and one for fertilizer is
planned, with manual loading arrangements. In subsequent phases, upon coal berth mechanized
mechanized wagon loading system (Rapid loading system) of two numbers and connected railway sidings
is planned to be developed. The line km in initial phase is worked out as 13.5 km including points &
crossings.
The Phase-I rail connectivity works involves the following major activities:
Only single line as lead line is planned from Naupada to entry of R&D yard. R &D yard is planned
with 3 lines, extended with one line for coal loading yard (manual loading) and one line for
fertilizer loading
Nos. of Bridges = 1 Nos. (minor) & 1 no. (major)
Nos. of Level Crossing = 1 No.
The Phase-II rail connectivity works involves the following major activities:
In phase -2, bulb is planned at Naupada station to avoid engine reversal at station
One additional crossing station with 4 lines is planned between Naupada and Port
R&D Yard = 1 no addition line
Two additional lines in coal loading yard with extension of existing line as post
Silo line. Mechanized loading by silo/ rapid loading system is planned
Extension of existing bridges (minor) = 16 Nos.
New ROB = 1 no
Figure 2.31: Schematic Layout Plan at Naupada Railway Station for Loop line to Bhavanapadu port
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 54
PORT INTERNAL INFRASTRUCTURE FACILITIES
2.7.3.1 Internal Road
In Phase-I, ~19 km of internal roads are proposed within the port area and all internal roads, two lane
roads are suggested. Internal Roads (2 lane) of 5 km (Bituminous) are proposed.
The design criterion for 2-Lane road is as follows:
Total width : 16 m
Main Carriageway width : 7 m
Paved shoulder : 1.5 m on either side (3 m)
Earthen shoulder : 1.0 m on either side (2 m)
Selected earths fill : 0.5 m on either side (1 m)
Earthen drain on : 1.5 m on either side (3 m)
The two lane design road cross section drawing is Figure 2.32.
Figure 2.32: Cross-section of Internal Road
2.7.3.2 Rail Connectivity to Port
A rail line of 5.5km length as internal rail connectivity for sidings for coal and fertilizers/ lime stone
handling. At port site marshalling yard has been planned. For internal marshalling yard, crossovers,
loading – unloading lines, engine escape lines a railway track for additional length of 6 Km is proposed.
Internal railway lines and rail yards have been planned and shown in the port internal infrastructure
facilities layout.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 55
2.8 UTILITIES AND SERVICES
WATER SUPPLY
The fresh water requirement for Phase-I development of the Port is assessed as 0.5 MLD. Fresh water will
be sourced from nearby reservoir. It is also explored to obtain water from the major water reservoirs
available in the proximity of Bhavanpadu port project site in Srikakulam district namely B.R.R.
Vamsadhara, Gotta barrage, Thottapalli barrage and Narayanapuram anicut. On the above, Gotta barrage
is about 50 km from Bhavanapadu. Pipeline from the reservoir shall be provided for supply of water.
Internal storage and distribution network will be developed in the port.
Table 2.13: Water Requirement
S. No. Activity Water Requirement (m3/day)
Phase I
1. Supply to ships 55.5
2. Domestic water 53.545
3. Stackyard- Dust suppression 25.0
4. Firefighting purposes 17.0
5. Green Belt Development 20.0
6. Miscellaneous 2.75
TOTAL 173.795
Total Daily Water Requirement for All Facilities (A+B+C) = 111295 Litre
Total Daily Domestic Water Supply (Fresh Water) from Above tables for
All the proposed facilities = 53545 Litre
Total Flushing Water Requirement = 57750 Litre
POWER SUPPLY
The estimated power requirement, taking all the requirements of power for conveyors, equipment and
illumination including future requirements, will be 5000 KVA. The power will be received from the State
Electricity Board in the Main Substation and distributed using two sub stations, one for the supply to the
Berths and one for the supply to the Yards. Power supply shall be received from Local power supply grid
of Naupada portal 11kV, 50Hz and hooked up to client’s electrical system through 6.6kV grade power
cables.
STORM WATER DRAINAGE SYSTEM
The Overall System for Site area is planned separately based on Catchment area and Rainfall Intensity. For
The drainage of building area and approach road, drainage network has been planned along the road and
around the plinth Protection of Building for initial collection of Surface water from Roof top and Road
Surface. This drain will collect this storm water and will discharge it to nearest Branch of Overall Drainage
Network.
Some of the factors that are considered for planning of the drainage network include:
Rainfall amount and storm distribution
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 56
Drainage area size, shape and orientation
Ground cover and soil type
Slopes of terrain and stream channel
Characteristics of the local drainage system.
The typical hydrologic processes in urban hydrology are related to:
Determination of peak flow rate
Determination of runoff volume
Runoff hydrograph – flow vs. Time
FIRE FIGHTING
Administrative Building shall be provided with separate fire hydrant riser connected to the twin outlet fire
hydrant landing valve with fire hose cabinet consisting of swinging hose reel, fire man’s axe, 63 mm dia
canvas hoses and nozzles. Externally, a fire fighting ring main of 150 mm diameter shall be provided
around Administrative Building, Workshop and Warehouses. External yard hydrants shall be suitably
located at 45 meter centres. There will be a set of fire department inlet connections with 4 Nos. 63 mm
dia male outlets, located externally. These inlets will have connections to the main riser as well as to the
fire hydrant static storage tank. Sprinkler system will be provided at warehouse building. Fire alarm
system shall be provided as per NBC 2016.
Portable fire extinguishers of following type are proposed in Administrative Building,
Workshop and Substation Buildings.
Carbon Dioxide (CO2) fire extinguisher of 4.5 kg. capacity cartridge type conform to IS 2878
/15683
ABC powder type fire extinguisher as per IS : 13849 /15683 of 6 kg capacity
D.C.P. type fire extinguisher 9 kg capacity cartridge type with Gun Metal cap 150 gram
CO2 gas cartridge, powder and brackets conforming to IS 2171-1985 (v) . Reference & Standards
used for Design of Building Services
National Building code of India 2016 Part-IV for Fire Fighting Services
National Building Code of India 2016 Part IX Plumbing Services
NOMOGRAM OF HAZEN AND WILLIAM.S EQUATION
IS 2065: 1983 Code of practice for water supply in buildings (second revision)
SP 35: 1987 Handbook on water supply and drainage with special emphasis on plumbing
CPHEO Manual for Water Supply System
CPHEO manual for Drainage
3844: 1989 Code of practice for installation and maintenance of internal fire hydrants and hose
reels on premises (first revision)
15105: 2002 Design and installation of fixed automatic sprinkler fire extinguishing system
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 57
WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT
The sewerage system is provided to the areas wherever office buildings, canteens, and other operational
buildings are constructed. The sewage that would be generated from port is about 40 KLD. It is proposed
to provide a sewage treatment plant of 40 KLD capacity which will be modularly developed. The treated
wastewater will be used for irrigating the green belt.
WASTE MANAGEMENT
Garbage collection bins will be provided at various locations in port. Bio-degradable and non-degradable
solid wastes will be segregated at collection points. Solid waste from the port is envisaged to be about
1750 kg/day. Bio-degradable and Non Biodegradable waste will be collected, Temporily stored and
transported for secured Integrated MSW Facility STP sludge will be dried into cakes; and subsequently
used as manure in greenbelt. Other wastes which can be re-cycled will be sold.
Wastes which cannot be re-cycled, effluent sludge and hazardous wastes will be disposed at nearest
Treatment, Storage and Disposal Facility (TSDF) through approved APPCB vendors.
DETAILS AND PROPER PLAN OF USE OF RENEWABLE ENERGY
1. As a part of “green port‟ initiative” by Ministry of Shipping the ports are to installed with grid-
connected, roof-top solar systems, in an effort to facilitate their daily operations, such as shore-
power supply to visiting vessels, in an eco-friendly way.
2. On-grid solar power system: The solar power plants are proposed keeping in mind the seasonal
weather changes, and also the annual power consumption of the port.Bhavanapadu port will use
about 5 MW power in the first phase and we undertake to use 5 to 10 % renewable energy from
solar plants with an estimated cost of Rs. 152.77 Lakhs. The solar plants shall be kept either in
site or out site or wind mills shall be used to provide the power. Approx.1-2 acres of land is
allocated for installation of on-Grid solar power system (PV modules structure).
3. Budget for the Renewable Energy:
S. No. System Quantity/Extent/Capacity Budget provided in lakh Rs.
1. On-grid solar power system 3.5 to 4.5 MW 152.77
TOTAL 152.77
2.9 CRZ DEMARCATION
National Centre for Sustainable Coastal Management (NCSCM), Anna University has been entrusted for
demarcation of HTL, LTL and CRZ areas in and around the proposed port site. Proposed port location does
not contain environmentally sensitive areas such as National parks / marine parks, sanctuaries, wildlife
habitats, corals / coral reefs. It also does not include breeding and spawning grounds of fish and other
marine life, area of outstanding natural beauty / historically / heritage area, area rich in genetic diversity.
Project layout superimposed on CZMP is given as Figure 2.33.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 58
Figure 2.33: Phase I Bhavanapadu Port Layout CZMP map
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 59
Figure 2.34: Phase I Bhavanapadu Port Layout CZMP map
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 60
2.10 COST ESTIMATES
Table 2.14: Summary of Abstract Capital Cost Estimate for Port Development
S. No Items Capital Cost (Rs lakh)
A. Internal Infrastructure
1 Dredging 90675
2 Breakwater 78818
3 Land/ Backup area/Stackyard Development 2078
4 Common Infrastructure 2314
5 Port Berth works 39354
6 Basin protection with diaphragm wall 7440
7 Cargo Handling Equipments 38726
8 Miscellaneous (Utilities) 4500
9 Miscellaneous cost for other facilities 2651
10 Navigational Aids 3309
11 Harbour Crafts 0
12 Internal Rail/ Yard etc. 6075
13 Internal Road 5215
14 Environment 755
15 Fire Fighting
System/Hazard Mitigation 985
Total A (1 to 15) 282895
B. External Infrastructure
16 Provision of external power supply 3000
17 Provision of external water supply 1900
18 Provision of external telecommunications 160
19 Port Road Connectivity 5640
20 Port Rail Connectivity 3750
Total B (16 to 20) 14450
21 Total Cost (A+B) 297345
22 Project Management
Consultancy (1.3% of 21) 3865
23 Contingency @ 3% (of S.No 21+22) 9036
27 Total Cost (excl. land) 310246
28 GST on Construction @12%) 37230
29 Preoperative Expenses (@ 2%) 6205
Total Cost (excl. land) 353681
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 61
PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
The project implementation schedule for Bhavanapadu port is enclosed. The construction of all facilities
will take about 30 months after obtaining statutory approvals.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 62
CHAPTER 3 DESCRIPTION OF ENVIRONMENT
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 63
3 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
3.1 GENERAL
This Chapter presents the existing baseline environmental conditions/attributes of the study area
surrounding the proposed port location. This helps to evaluate & predict potential impacts of the
proposed port development on the various environmental and social aspects in the study area by
scientifically and widely accepted environmental impact assessment methodologies.
3.2 STUDY AREA AND STUDY PERIOD
A radial distance of 10 km from the port boundary is selected to undertake baseline monitoring and
generate the baseline information for the EIA. The study area on Google image is given in Figure 3.1.
Initial assessment of the study area through satellite imagery and field visit has been conducted to
work out basic planning of environmental monitoring of various parameters. The baseline data on the
terrestrial and marine environment were collected during October to December 2020 (Post-Monsoon
Season), April to June 2021 (Pre-monsoon Season) and July to September 2021 (Monsoon Season).
The samples were analysed by Lotus Granges (India) Ltd laboratory, Vishakhapatnam which is accredited
by the National Accreditation Board for Laboratory (NABL).
3.3 LAND ENVIRONMENT
TOPOGRAPHY AND REGIONAL SETTING
Srikakulum district lies on the North-eastern region of Andhra Pradesh and is situated between North
Latitudes 18°20´ to 19°10´ and between 83°50´ to 84°50´ East longitudes with a maximum height of
1,660 mts AMSL. Srikakulum district is surrounded by Koraput and Ganjam districts of Odisha State in
the North, East and South by Bay of Bengal and West by Vizianagaram district. The district is spread over
an area of 5,837 square kilometres.
The terrain of the area is mostly flat with minor undulations. There is a beach and rain-fed agriculture is
been practiced in the area. The topography shows maximum land in and around under salt farming
hence, there is a presence of saltpans. After the beach there is a Forestland and creek on the North side.
Port Site:
The elevation of the port site ranges between 2.0 m to 13.0 m. At the port eastern boundary, ground
level varies from 6.0 m to 10.0 m and raise down to 2.0 m, towards the western boundary of port
location. However, in the creek near shoreline, the ground levels are in the range of 1.0 m to 4.0 m. The
site consists of vegetated open scrub, scattered trees of cashew, casuarina and plants of mixed types;
som pure Palmyra (Borassus flabellifer), some Palmyra with Casaurina, Cashew.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 64
Figure 3.1: Study Area – 10 km radius from Port Boundary
Development of Greenfield Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 65
GEOLOGY AND GEOMORPHOLOGY
GEOLOGY
Srikakulam district is made up of Archaean ages of geological time scale rocks such as granites and
charnockites that have been intruded into the highly folded and metamorphosed sedimentary rocks of
the Khondalite class. The area is part of Peninsula's stable shield, where Orogenic activity and igneous
intrusions were confined to the Archaean Era. Lateritic and alluvial soils of recent age lie on top of them.
The district could be divided into two parts as follows:
The coastal plain on the eastern and southern parts, covered with soil and alluvium dotted with
isolated hils.
Hilly country forming part of the Eastern Ghats covered with forests on the northern and western
Parts.
Source: https://censusindia.gov.in/2011census/dchb/2811_PART_A_DCHB_SRIKAKULAM.pdf
Figure 3.2: Geology and Mineral Map
Development of Greenfield Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 66
GEOMORPHOLOGY
The district is geomorphologically divided into four main distinct units’ viz., structural hills, pediplains,
alluvial plains and coastal plains. The majority of the district in the northern and western region is
represented by structural hills i.e., high topographic relief and is marked by hills forming the extensions
of Eastern ghats and depict a NW-SE trend. Prominent hills like Mulegakonda, Gangadakonda,
Nagalakonda, Suddalakonda and Antikoda form a crescent shape and indicate a NW-SE tendency. The
Pandara Hills, west of Kotturu, reach a maximum height of 2,000 feet. The hilly terrain is mostly confined
to Palakonda, Hiramandalam, Pathapatnam, Tekkali and Amudalavalasa mandals. The pediplains, which
are spread over a larger part of the district, constitute shallow buried pediplains, deeply burried
pediplains, pediments, residual hills and inselbergs. The thickness of weathered zone in these structures
varies from 5 to 15 m. The occurrence of ground water in this unit is generally poor except along
fractures where moderate yields can be expected.
The alluvial plains emerge alongside major river channels, valleys and the foothill zones oif structural
hills. The narrow and steep intermontane valleys can be found between numerous hill ranges in the
western region and the coast. The plains' elevation ranges from 60 to 120 metres above sea level. The
plain country is very wide upto 15 km at north of Amudalavalasa and east of Srikakulam, it narrows
down at south of Icchapuram. The alluvial plains that run parallel to the river's main channel are
responsible for the formation of flood plain deposits. The alluvial plains form shallow to deep fresh
water aquifers with good to very good yields. The coastal plains occur parallel and nearer to the sea and
are of marine origin.
Source: http://cgwb.gov.in/District_Profile/AP/Srikakulam.pdf
Development of Greenfield Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 67
HYDROGEOLOGY
Structurally the area is highly disturbed as evidenced by the structurally controlled rivers viz:
Vamsadhara and Nagavali which are observed to flow in the faulted zone trending NW-SE direction.
Prominent lineaments are trending in NE-SW, NW-SE and NNWSSE. Ground water can be found in nearly
all geological formation. In view of the ground water, the available aquifers in the district can be
distinctly divided into hard rocks (kondalites),quartzies, charnockites, grabitic gnesisses, etc.) and soft
rocks (sand stones, river alluvium, coastal alluvium, etc.). In hard rock formations, ground water are
found in unconfined to semi-confined circumstances, whereas in soft rock formations, it is found in
unconfined to confined situations. The yields of khondalites and charnockites in weathered zones are
extremely low, ranging from 10 to 20 m3/d. The yields of weathered granitic gneisses range from 10 to
40 m3 per day. Bore wells drilled into hard rocks are typically used to access fractured and fissured
zones. Bore well yields range from 1 to 3 litres per second. The accessible thickness of fractured,
fissured, and jointed zones limits the higher yields. Fractures are usually restricted to 30 to 40 m bgl, but
they can infrequently extend to 70-100 m bgl. The river alluvium, which is made up of unconsolidated
sediment and high porosity and permeability, forms a potential aquifer system. In this aquifer, yields
typically range from 3 to 5 lps.
In strata consisting of thick sand and gravel beds, 7 to 9 lps yields are occasionally recorded. Depending
on the availability of sand beds, coastal alluvium has a good output potential of 2 to 4 lps. In sandstone
formations, yields range from 6 to 19 lps. The granularity of the sandstone bed is the deciding element
in production potential, as wells tapping coarse sandstone layers produce larger yields.
Source: http://cgwb.gov.in/District_Profile/AP/Srikakulam.pdf
The Hydrogeology- Srikakulam District map is shown in the below Figure 3.3.
Development of Greenfield Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 68
Source: http://cgwb.gov.in/District_Profile/AP/Srikakulam.pdf
Figure 3.3: Hydrogeology- Srikakulam District
Development of Greenfield Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 69
3.3.5.1 Water Level Scenario
During the pre-monsoon season (May, 2020), the depth to water level in the district normally
ranged between 5 and 10 mbgl. Seetampeta, Veeraghattam, Vangara, Saravakota, Gara, Meliaputti,
Patapatnam, and Ichapuram mandals represented shallow water levels of less than 5 m bgl. At Palasa
and Kotturu, however, water levels of more than 10 m bgl have been observed. The Depth to Water
level in Pre Monsoon (May 2020), Srikakulum District is shown in the below Figure 3.4.
Figure 3.4: Depth to Water level – Pre Monsoon (May 2020), Srikakulum District
During monsoon season (August, 2020), the depth to water level in the district was 2 to 5 m bgl. During
the post-monsoon season (November 2020), the depth to water level in the district was 0 to 5 m bgl.
Laveru, G.Sigadam, Ponduru, Rajam, and Ranastalam mandals had deeper water levels of more than 2
mbgl. The Depth to Water level in Monsoon (August, 2020) and Post monsoon season (November,
2020), Srikakulum District is shown in the below Figure 3.5 and Figure 3.6.
Development of Greenfield Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 70
Figure 3.5: Depth to Water level – Monsoon (August , 2020), Srikakulum District
Figure 3.6: Depth to Water level – Post Monsoon (November 2020), Srikakulum District
Source: http://cgwb.gov.in/Regions/SR/Reports/Ground%20Water%20Year%20Book_Andhra%20Pradesh_2020-21.pdf
Development of Greenfield Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 71
Attempt has been made to understand the ground water level in the district during the sampling period
from Post monsoon season, 2020 to Monsoon season, 2021. In the district 42.11 % of the ground water
level is less than 3 m followed by 44.74 % is ranging between 3 to 8 m, 10.53 % is 8 to 20 m and 2.63 %
is is less than 20 m.
In Santabommali Mandal where the project site is located, dynamic ground water level ranges between
5.03 m in Febuary 2021 followed by 6.93 in June 2021 and 5.30 in Febuary 2022.
Figure 3.7: Depth to Groundwater levels in Srikakulam by Percentage October 2020 to October 2021
Figure 3.8: Depth to Groundwater levels in Santabommali Mandal (2021-2022) Source: https://apwrims.ap.gov.in
Development of Greenfield Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 72
LAND USE
The Land use plan for Port area and study area is given in the Table 3.1 and Table 3.2 respectively. The
Figure 3.6 shows the landuse map of the study area
3.3.6.1 Land use for Port Area
Table 3.1 : Land use for port area S. No. Land use category Area in sq km Area in %
1 Agriculture Land 1.20 29.43
2 Settlement 0.00 0.03
3 Waterbody 0.70 17.17
4 Forest 0.01 0.29
5 Saltpan 1.62 39.74
6 Costal sand 0.49 12.12
7 Open scrub 0.05 1.22
Total 4.08 100.00
3.3.6.2 Land use for Study Area
Table 3.2: Land use plan for study area S. No. Land use category Area in sq km Area in %
1 Agriculture Land 121.53 30.32
2 Settlement 2.64 0.66
3 Waterbody 221.82 55.34
4 Plantation 8.51 2.12
5 Open scrub 4.64 1.16
6 Wetland 37.85 9.44
7 Forest 3.45 0.86
8 Mangrove 0.375 0.09
Total 400.81 100.00
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 73
Figure 3.9: Landuse Map – 10 Km Radius LULC
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 74
Figure 3.10: Landuse Map- Project Site
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 75
SEISMICITY & EARTHQUAKE
The state of Andhra Pradesh falls in a region of Low Damage Risk Zone (Zone II) to Moderate Damage
Risk Zone (Zone III) and the Srikakulam district falls in two seismic zones II and III with the major part of
the district falling in zone II. The proposed green field port location at Bhavanapadu is falling in Zone II as
per revised seismic zoning map of Andhra Pradesh is shown in Figure 3.11. Suitable seismic factor
need to be considered while, designing the structures for the proposed port facilities.
Source: Vulnerability Atlas of India Third Edition 2019 https://vai.bmtpc.org/th.html
Figure 3.11: Seismicity Map of Andhra Pradesh
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 76
ENVIRONMENTAL SENSITIVITY
Table 3.3: Environmental Sensitivity
S. No.
Areas Yes/ No
Aerial distance (within 15 km) from proposed project location boundary
1 Areas protected under international
conventions, national or local legislation for
their ecological, land scape, cultural or other
related value
No The area is not covered under any International convention or local legislation for their ecological, land scape, cultural or other related value.
2 Areas which are important or sensitive for
ecological reasons- Wetlands, watercourses
or other water bodies, coastal zone,
biospheres, mountains, forests
Yes There are saltpans present within 15 km from Port
area
Mulapeta salt pans is adjacent to the project site.
Naupada salt pans is at 5.2 km in SW direction
from the project site,
Presence of bird nesting site in Telineelapuram
village is at 8.2 km in WNW direction from the
project site.
3 Areas used by protected, important or
sensitive species of flora or fauna for
breeding, nesting, foraging, resting, over
wintering, migration
No There are no protected, important or sensitive
species of flora or fauna for breeding, nesting,
foraging, resting, over wintering, or migration in the
study area.
4 Inland, coastal, marine or underground
waters
Yes It is a port project on the Bay of Bengal Coast
5 State, National boundaries No State or National boundaries do not come in 15 km
from the boundary of the project.
6 Routes or facilities used by the public for
access to recreation or other tourist,
pilgrim areas
Yes The existing road connectivity shall be utilized
by the public i.e the National Highway – 5/NH-
16 from Chennai to Kolkata, which is at a
distance of about 14.0 km from Bhavanapadu
port site.
Bhavanapadu is connected to NH-16 / NH-5 by
means of a single lane bituminous road of 5
meters. New alignment is proposed to connect
the South of the Tekkali Creek Location of the
Bhavanapadu Port.
7 Defence installations No Not present within 15 km distance from the project site.
8 Densely populated or built-up area Yes The proposed project is located in Santhabommali
Tehsil, Srikakulam district; Villages like Mulapet,
Rajapuram, Kothalingudu of Santhabommali Mandal
are densely populated within 15 km of the proposed
Project site.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 77
S. No.
Areas Yes/ No
Aerial distance (within 15 km) from proposed project location boundary
9 Areas occupied by sensitive manmade land
uses(hospitals, schools, places of worship,
community facilities)
Yes The project is located in Santhabommali Mandal,
Srikakulam district which is surrounded by
several populated localities, hence, several
hospitals, schools, places of worship and
community facilities are present in 15 km area.
10 Areas containing important, high quality or
scarce resources (ground water resources,
surface resources, forestry, agriculture,
fisheries, tourism, minerals)
No None
11 Areas already subjected to pollution or
environmental damage.(those where existing
legal environmental standards are exceeded)
No None
12 Areas susceptible to natural hazard which
could cause the project to present
environmental problems (earthquakes,
subsidence, landslides erosion, flooding or
extreme or adverse climatic conditions)
No The proposed Project area falls under zone II
as per IS 1893 (Part I): 2016 seismic zone
classification, which is a low damage risk zone.
On 11th October’2018, the severe cyclonic
storm “TITLI” caused damage over north
Andhra Pradesh and adjoining areas.
Cyclone 'Titli' made landfall near Palasa in
Srikakulam district, southwest of Gopalpur in
Odisha with an estimated maximum sustained
surface wind speed of 140-150 km per hour
gusting to 165 km per hour
Proposed Port Structures will be designed as per
the Seismic zone requirements and extreme
cyclonic conditions.
3.4 AIR ENVIRONMENT
METEOROLOGY
The meteorological data recorded during the study period is very useful in proper interpretation of the
baseline information, surrounding area for air dispersion. Historical data on meteorological parameters
play an important role in identifying the general meteorological regime of the region.
3.4.1.1 Secondary data
The meteorological data was collected from the IMD Vishakhapatnam (1981-2010) located at a distance
of around 160 km in SW direction. The data collected from IMD includes wind speed, temperature,
relative humidity and rainfall. The monthly maximum, minimum and average values are collected for all
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 78
the parameters except wind speed. All these parameters are recorded twice a day viz. at 08:30 and
17:30 hours. The collected data is tabulated in Table 3.4.
Table 3.4: IMD Meteorological Data – 1981-2010
Month Temperature Relative
Humidity Monthly Total
Rainfall Predominant wind
direction Mean Wind
speed
Daily Daily
(%) (mm) (kmph) Max Min
January 29.5 18.4 77 10.5 E,SE,S 5.2
February 31.6 20.5 75 12.1 S,SW,E 5.5
March 34.2 23.7 71 11.4 SW,S,W 6.1
April 35.4 26.3 67 21.8 SW,S,W 8.5
May 36.3 27.8 67 63 SW,S,W 8.8
June 35.4 27.8 71 117.6 SW,S,W 8.3
July 33.4 26.7 76 130.4 SW,W,S 7.8
August 33 26.3 77 157.8 SW,W,S 7.3
September 33 26.1 78 202.1 SW,W,NW 5.2
October 32.3 24.9 75 209.3 E,NE,NW 5.1
November 30.9 22 69 87.9 E,NE,N 6.1
December 29.5 18.8 70 7.7 E,NE,SE 5.9
Annual Total/ Mean
32.9 24.1 73 1031.7 SW,W,S 6.7
Number of Years 30 30 30 30 30 26 *Source: Climatological Tables 1981-2010, Indian Meteorological Dept., Govt. of India
3.4.1.1.1 Climate
The district's climate is moderate, with high humidity throughout the year, as well as scorching summers
and abundant seasonal rains. From December to the middle of February, the weather is often pleasant.
The annual total maximum temperature recorded is 32.9°C while the annual total minimum
temperature is 24.1°C. The month of May recorded the maximum temperature of 36.3°C while the
minimum temperature of 29.5°C was recorded in the month of January and December.
3.4.1.1.2 Rainfall
The month of October received the maximum rainfall i.e., 635.3mm in the year1928 while the month of
January received the minimum rainfall i.e., 165.6mm in the year 1908. The annual total or mean rainfall
has been recorded to be 1031.7 mm.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 79
3.4.1.1.3 Annual Windrose
Figure 3.12: Annual average Wind-rose diagram of IMD station Vishakhapatnam (1981-2010
3.4.1.2 Primary Data
3.4.1.2.1 Temperature
Post Monsoon Season: Maximum and minimum temperatures observed are 37.80C and 10.60C
respectively.
Monsoon Season: Maximum and minimum temperatures observed are 37.80C and 10.60C respectively.
Pre Monsoon Season: Maximum and minimum temperatures observed are 37.80C and 10.60C
respectively.
3.4.1.2.2 Humidity
Post Monsoon Season: Maximum and minimum relative humidity recorded is 92% and 13%
respectively.
Monsoon Season: Maximum and minimum relative humidity recorded is 92% and 13% respectively.
Pre Monsoon Season: Maximum and minimum relative humidity recorded is 92% and 13% respectively.
3.4.1.2.3 Rainfall
Post Monsoon Season: Rainfall recorded during the post monsoon season is XX mm respectively.
Monsoon Season: Rainfall recorded during the monsoon season is XX mm respectively.
Pre Monsoon Season: Rainfall recorded during the pre monsoon season is XX mm respectively.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 80
3.4.1.2.4 Wind Speed and Wind Direction
The daily-recorded meteorological data was processed and wind roses were drawn on a sixteen-point
compass (N, NNE, NE, ENE; E, ESE, SE, SSE; S, SSW, SW, WSW; W, WNW, NW, and NNW).
Figure 3.13: Primary Wind-Rose Diagram- Monsoon Season
CYCLONES AND DEPRESSIONS
The average annual frequency of tropical cyclones in the northern Indian Ocean (Bay of Bengal and
Arabian Sea) is about 5, however, the frequency of cyclone is reportedly more in the Bay of Bengal than
Arabian Sea, the ratio being 4:1. The list of historical cyclones crossed Andhra Pradesh coastline is
presented in Table 3.5. On 11th October’2018, the very severe cyclonic storm “TITLI” caused extensive
damage over north Andhra Pradesh and adjoining areas.
Cyclone 'Titli' made landfall near Palasa in Srikakulam district, southwest of Gopalpur in Odisha with an
estimated maximum sustained surface wind speed of 140-150 km per hour gusting to 165 km per hour.
Table 3.5: Lists of historical Cyclones crossed in the Andhra Pradesh S.No. Cyclone time Wind Speed (Kmph) Category
1. 15-23 Nov1972 90 2
2. 14-20 Nov1977 110 3
3. 5-13 May1979 85 2
4. 9-15 Nov1984 85 2
5. 03-11 May1990 125 4
6. Lalila17-20 May2010 120 4
7. Jal 05-07 Nov2010 110 3
8. Thane 25-31 Dec 2011 165 5
9. Nilam28 Oct-1stNov2012 85 2
10. Mahasen10-16 May2013 85 2
11. Hudhud 08-13 Oct2014 150 2
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 81
S.No. Cyclone time Wind Speed (Kmph) Category
12. Vardh 12 Deember 2016 150 2
13. Titli 08 – 13 October, 2018 165 2
AIR SAMPLING & METHODOLOGY FOR MONITORING
Air pollution can cause significant effects on the environment and subsequently on human, animals,
vegetation and materials. In most cases, air pollution aggravates pre-existing diseases or degrades
health status, making people easily susceptible to other infections and development of chronic
respiratory and cardiovascular diseases. Further, environmental impacts from air pollution can include
acidic deposition and reduction in visibility. During construction phase, Fugitive dust is the major
pollutant and minor air pollution may occur due to drilling, vehicle and D.G set operation.
A site–specific background of air quality monitoring program was conducted for the proposed project
site during October to December 2020 (Post-Monsoon Season), April to June 2021 (Pre-monsoon
Season) and July to September 2021 (Monsoon Season). Monitoring data was collected for PM10, PM2.5,
SO2, NOx and CO five sampling stations located within study area to provide the surrounding baseline air
quality. Also monitoring data for Ozone, Lead (Pb), Carbon Monoxide (CO), Ammonia (NH3), Benzene
(C6H6), Benzo (a) Pyrene (BaP), Arsenic (As), Nickel (Ni) is also collected for proposed site along with the
5 criteria pollutants.
For the selection of the monitoring locations, long-term meteorological trends were taken into
consideration to obtain the predominant wind direction during the sampling period. The monitoring was
carried out following CPCB standard protocol. The ambient air quality monitoring was conducted by the
EIA consultant through M/s Lotus Granges (India) Ltd, Andhra Pradesh (NABL Accredited Laboratory).
Sampling was carried out on 24 hourly twice a week. The ambient air quality monitoring locations are
detailed in Table 3.7.
TESTING METHOD FOR AMBIENT AIR QUALITY
Table 3.6: Testing Method for Ambient Air Quality Particular Testing Method to be Followed
Ambient Air Monitoring Parameters
PM10 IS-5182 (part – IV) 2006
PM2.5 EPA - Quality Assurance Guidance Document 2.12
SO2 (Sulfur Dioxide) IS 5182 (Part – II) 2001, with Improved West &Gaeke Method
NO2 (Nitrogen Dioxide) Modified Jacobs – Hochheiser Method / Arsenite Method
CO (Carbon Monoxide) Indicator Tube Method/CO Analyzer
Table 3.7: Ambient Air Quality Monitoring locations
S. No.
Station Code
Locations Direction Dist. (Km)
GPS Details
Latitude Longitude
1 AAQ1 Project site - - 18°32'13.94"N 84°19'32.84"E
2 AAQ2 Near Devunalthada Village N 1.3 18°34'35.76"N 84°21'21.19"E
3 AAQ3 Near Palavanipeta Village SW 4.99 18°30'4.09"N 84°15'53.04"E
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 82
S. No.
Station Code
Locations Direction Dist. (Km)
GPS Details
Latitude Longitude
4 AAQ4 Near Naupada Village ENE 7.04 18°34'24.57"N 84°15'55.54"E
5 AAQ5 Near Peddarokallapalle Village
NW 7.77 18°37'25.08"N 84°19'29.57"E
Ambient air quality levels were assessed with respect to National Ambient Air Quality Standards
(NAAQS) prescribed by MoEF&CC, 2009 Summary results of ambient air quality monitoring data
location wise for all three season are shown in Table 3.8 to Table 3.12 .The Samping location is
showing in figure 3.15 and the AAQ sampling photograph is shown in Figure 3.14..
Figure 3.14: Air Monitoring Photographs
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 83
Figure 3.15: Google Earth Image Showing Monitoring Locations – require on SOI map
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 84
AMBIENT AIR QUALITY RESULTS
3.4.5.1 Ambient Air Quality Results for post Monsoon Season
Table 3.8: Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Result AAQ1 (Post Monsoon Season, Pre Monson, and Monsoon) (µg/m3)
Monitoring Period
Description PM10
μg/m3 PM2.5 μg/m3
SO2 μg/m3
NOx μg/m3
O3 μg/m3
CO mg/m3
Ozone μg/m3
Pb μg/m3
NH3 μg/m3
Benzene μg/m3
BaP ng/m3
Arsenic ng/m3
Nickel μg/m3
Post-Monsoon Period
MIN 12.1 4.8 4.4 2.3 4.0 <1.0 4.0 <0.015 0.2 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
MAX 23.5 10.8 13.4 12.0 15.0 <1.0 15.0 <0.015 2.2 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
AVG 18.1 7.0 9.9 6.3 7.7 <1.0 7.7 <0.015 1.0 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
10th 13.3 4.8 8.1 3.3 5.0 <1.0 5.0 <0.015 0.5 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
20th 13.7 4.8 8.9 3.8 6.0 <1.0 6.0 <0.015 0.5 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
30th 15.8 4.8 9.0 4.8 6.0 <1.0 6.0 <0.015 0.6 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
50th 19.2 6.8 9.4 6.1 7.5 <1.0 7.5 <0.015 0.9 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
80th 21.4 9.1 11.5 8.4 10.0 <1.0 10.0 <0.015 1.6 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
98th 23.5 9.7 13.4 11.1 13.5 <1.0 13.5 <0.015 2.1 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
AM 18.1 7.0 9.9 6.3 7.7 <1.0 7.7 <0.015 1.0 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
GM 17.6 6.7 9.7 5.8 7.3 <1.0 7.3 <0.015 0.9 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
Standard Deviation 3.8 2.3 1.9 2.5 2.6 <1.0 2.6 <0.015 0.6 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
95th 23.3 10.8 13.2 10.2 11.5 <1.0 11.5 <0.015 2.0 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
Pre-Monsoon Period
MIN 17.1 4.0 7.9 4.7 4.0 <1.0 4.0 <0.015 0.1 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
MAX 36.3 18.0 12.8 9.7 15.0 <1.0 15.0 <0.015 1.8 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
AVG 26.8 5.7 10.2 7.6 9.2 <1.0 9.2 <0.015 0.9 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
10th 26.6 5.0 8.8 6.0 5.5 <1.0 5.5 <0.015 0.2 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
20th 23.2 5.0 9.1 6.2 7.0 <1.0 7.0 <0.015 0.4 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
30th 24.4 5.0 9.3 6.9 8.0 <1.0 8.0 <0.015 0.6 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 85
Monitoring Period
Description PM10
μg/m3 PM2.5 μg/m3
SO2 μg/m3
NOx μg/m3
O3 μg/m3
CO mg/m3
Ozone μg/m3
Pb μg/m3
NH3 μg/m3
Benzene μg/m3
BaP ng/m3
Arsenic ng/m3
Nickel μg/m3
50th 26.6 5.1 10.3 7.5 10.0 <1.0 10.0 <0.015 1.0 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
80th 32.0 6.2 11.0 9.1 11.0 <1.0 11.0 <0.015 1.4 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
98th 35.8 7.5 12.5 9.6 14.0 <1.0 14.0 <0.015 1.7 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
AM 26.8 5.7 10.2 7.6 9.2 <1.0 9.2 <0.015 0.9 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
GM 26.4 5.6 10.1 7.5 8.8 <1.0 8.8 <0.015 0.7 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
Standard Deviation 4.9 3.8 1.2 1.4 2.6 <1.0 2.6 <0.015 0.5 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
95th 34.7 15.9 12.2 9.5 12.8 <1.0 12.8 <0.015 1.6 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
Monsoon Period
MIN 14.3 12.7 6.9 4.6 7.0 <1.0 7.0 <0.015 0.1 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
MAX 34.6 36.4 12.2 13.4 15.0 <1.0 15.0 <0.015 2.4 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
AVG 24.4 26.7 9.5 8.7 10.4 <1.0 10.4 <0.015 1.0 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
10th 18.2 23.1 7.9 5.6 8.5 <1.0 8.5 <0.015 0.1 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
20th 18.6 23.7 8.2 6.0 10.0 <1.0 10.0 <0.015 0.2 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
30th 19.4 24.2 8.6 6.3 10.0 <1.0 10.0 <0.015 0.5 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
50th 23.9 27.0 9.4 9.0 10.0 <1.0 10.0 <0.015 1.0 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
80th 30.8 29.9 10.9 11.2 11.0 <1.0 11.0 <0.015 1.6 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
98th 33.2 30.0 12.1 12.9 13.5 <1.0 13.5 <0.015 2.4 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
AM 24.4 26.7 9.5 8.7 10.4 <1.0 10.4 <0.015 1.0 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
GM 23.6 26.5 9.4 8.3 10.3 <1.0 10.3 <0.015 0.7 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
Standard Deviation 6.2 6.2 1.4 2.6 1.6 <1.0 1.6 <0.015 0.8 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
95th 31.7 30.7 11.9 12.4 12.0 <1.0 12.0 <0.015 2.3 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 86
Table 3.9: Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Result AAQ2 (Post Monsoon Season, Pre-Monsoon Season, Monsoon Season) (µg/m3)
Monitoring Period
Description PM10
(μg/m3) PM2.5
(μg/m3) SO2
(μg/m3) NOx
(μg/m3) CO
(mg/m3) Ozone
(μg/m3) Pb
(μg/m3) NH3
(μg/m3) Benzene (μg/m3)
BaP (ng/m3)
Arsenic (ng/m3)
Nickel (μg/m3)
Post-Monsoon Period
MIN 10.9 3.6 7.9 3.5 <1.0 4.0 <0.015 0.4 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
MAX 30.4 6.2 14.0 12.3 <1.0 20.0 <0.015 2.2 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
AVG 22.2 4.8 10.9 7.9 <1.0 9.2 <0.015 1.3 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
10th 16.9 3.7 8.9 4.0 <1.0 5.5 <0.015 0.6 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
20th 18.8 3.8 9.2 4.6 <1.0 6.0 <0.015 0.7 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
30th 19.3 3.8 9.7 6.0 <1.0 6.0 <0.015 0.9 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
50th 22.0 4.1 10.6 9.0 <1.0 10.0 <0.015 1.3 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
80th 26.7 6.1 12.9 10.1 <1.0 10.0 <0.015 2.0 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
98th 30.4 6.2 13.9 12.0 <1.0 18.0 <0.015 2.2 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
AM 22.2 4.8 10.9 7.9 <1.0 9.2 <0.015 1.3 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
GM 21.6 4.7 10.7 7.4 <1.0 8.5 <0.015 1.1 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
Standard Deviation 4.6 1.1 1.8 2.8 <1.0 3.7 <0.015 0.6 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
95th 29.5 6.2 13.8 11.6 <1.0 15.5 <0.015 2.1 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
Pre-Monsoon Period
MIN 17.6 4.3 8.8 5.8 < 1.0 6.0 <0.015 0.3 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
MAX 42.6 18.6 15.3 12.4 < 1.0 16.0 <0.015 2.2 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
AVG 31.1 10.2 12.1 7.9 < 1.0 10.2 <0.015 1.1 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
10th 24.3 4.5 9.6 6.2 < 1.0 6.0 <0.015 0.6 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
20th 26.7 5.4 10.5 6.7 < 1.0 8.0 <0.015 0.6 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
30th 29.0 6.3 11.2 6.9 < 1.0 8.0 <0.015 0.8 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
50th 30.8 9.9 12.5 8.1 < 1.0 10.0 <0.015 1.0 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
80th 35.0 14.5 13.6 8.8 < 1.0 12.0 <0.015 1.6 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
98th 42.4 17.6 14.9 11.0 < 1.0 16.0 <0.015 2.2 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 87
Monitoring Period
Description PM10
(μg/m3) PM2.5
(μg/m3) SO2
(μg/m3) NOx
(μg/m3) CO
(mg/m3) Ozone
(μg/m3) Pb
(μg/m3) NH3
(μg/m3) Benzene (μg/m3)
BaP (ng/m3)
Arsenic (ng/m3)
Nickel (μg/m3)
AM 31.1 10.2 12.1 7.9 < 1.0 10.2 <0.015 1.1 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
GM 30.5 9.2 12.0 7.8 < 1.0 9.7 <0.015 1.0 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
Standard Deviation 5.8 4.5 1.8 1.4 < 1.0 3.2 <0.015 0.5 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
95th 40.7 16.5 14.4 9.5 < 1.0 16.0 <0.015 2.1 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
Monsoon Period
MIN 13.9 4.1 1.2 3.4 < 1.0 8.0 <0.015 0.1 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
MAX 42.1 25.7 13.4 13.9 < 1.0 20.0 <0.015 2.0 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
AVG 27.2 13.6 10.0 7.6 < 1.0 11.1 <0.015 0.8 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
10th 19.6 6.1 7.8 4.2 < 1.0 8.0 <0.015 0.3 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
20th 22.9 8.9 9.0 5.4 < 1.0 8.0 <0.015 0.5 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
30th 23.6 10.1 9.2 5.9 < 1.0 10.0 <0.015 0.5 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
50th 25.9 12.6 10.3 6.9 < 1.0 10.0 <0.015 0.8 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
80th 33.0 20.6 11.3 10.4 < 1.0 12.0 <0.015 1.2 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
98th 41.7 25.2 13.3 13.2 < 1.0 20.0 <0.015 1.8 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
AM 27.2 13.6 10.0 7.6 < 1.0 11.1 <0.015 0.8 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
GM 26.3 12.1 9.4 7.1 < 1.0 10.7 <0.015 0.7 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
Standard Deviation 6.8 6.3 2.4 2.9 < 1.0 3.3 <0.015 0.5 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
95th 40.0 24.4 13.1 12.4 < 1.0 19.0 <0.015 1.5 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 88
Table 3.10: Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Result AAQ3 (Post Monsoon Season, Pre-Monsoon Season, Monsoon Season) (µg/m3)
Monitoring Period
Description PM10
(μg/m3) PM2.5
(μg/m3) SO2
(μg/m3) NOx
(μg/m3) CO
(mg/m3) Ozone
(μg/m3) Pb
(μg/m3) NH3
(μg/m3) Benzene (μg/m3)
BaP (ng/m3)
Arsenic (ng/m3)
Nickel (μg/m3)
Post-Monsoon Period
MIN 17.5 3.0 7.7 1.5 < 1.0 4.0 <0.015 0.2 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
MAX 32.9 10.8 13.3 12.3 < 1.0 18.0 <0.015 2.3 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
AVG 23.9 7.2 10.2 7.4 < 1.0 10.7 <0.015 1.3 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
10th 19.8 3.9 8.0 4.0 < 1.0 6.0 <0.015 0.6 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
20th 20.8 5.1 9.0 5.4 < 1.0 6.0 <0.015 0.6 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
30th 21.1 6.2 9.1 5.9 < 1.0 8.0 <0.015 0.9 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
50th 22.9 7.0 10.3 7.5 < 1.0 10.0 <0.015 1.4 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
80th 28.5 9.5 11.7 9.5 < 1.0 16.0 <0.015 2.0 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
98th 32.9 10.8 13.2 11.9 < 1.0 18.0 <0.015 2.3 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
AM 23.9 7.2 10.2 7.4 < 1.0 10.7 <0.015 1.3 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
GM 23.5 6.7 10.1 6.7 < 1.0 9.8 <0.015 1.1 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
Standard Deviation 4.3 2.4 1.6 2.7 < 1.0 4.4 <0.015 0.6 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
95th 32.3 10.7 12.9 11.4 < 1.0 18.0 <0.015 2.2 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
Pre-Monsoon Period
MIN 19.5 4.3 7.6 4.6 < 1.0 6.0 <0.015 0.1 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
MAX 46.9 18.2 13.5 9.5 < 1.0 16.0 <0.015 2.2 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
AVG 31.5 12.0 10.4 7.2 < 1.0 10.5 <0.015 1.2 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
10th 22.0 5.7 9.1 5.9 < 1.0 6.0 <0.015 0.7 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
20th 27.1 9.5 9.1 6.1 < 1.0 8.0 <0.015 0.8 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
30th 27.8 10.7 9.4 6.3 < 1.0 9.0 <0.015 0.8 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
50th 30.9 12.7 10.5 7.0 < 1.0 10.0 <0.015 1.0 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
80th 37.2 15.2 11.6 8.4 < 1.0 12.0 <0.015 1.8 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
98th 46.9 18.2 13.4 9.4 < 1.0 15.0 <0.015 2.2 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 89
Monitoring Period
Description PM10
(μg/m3) PM2.5
(μg/m3) SO2
(μg/m3) NOx
(μg/m3) CO
(mg/m3) Ozone
(μg/m3) Pb
(μg/m3) NH3
(μg/m3) Benzene (μg/m3)
BaP (ng/m3)
Arsenic (ng/m3)
Nickel (μg/m3)
AM 31.5 12.0 10.4 7.2 < 1.0 10.5 <0.015 1.2 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
GM 30.7 11.3 10.3 7.1 < 1.0 10.1 <0.015 1.1 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
Standard Deviation 7.1 3.8 1.5 1.3 < 1.0 2.8 <0.015 0.6 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
95th 44.5 17.7 12.9 9.2 < 1.0 14.0 <0.015 2.2 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
Monsoon Period
MIN 15.2 4.3 7.0 0.0 < 1.0 6.0 <0.015 0.1 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
MAX 40.6 24.9 14.4 14.1 < 1.0 18.0 <0.015 2.5 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
AVG 29.6 12.2 9.9 7.0 < 1.0 11.3 <0.015 1.1 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
10th 21.4 5.9 7.9 3.3 < 1.0 8.0 <0.015 0.3 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
20th 22.8 6.8 8.3 4.6 < 1.0 10.0 <0.015 0.5 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
30th 26.0 9.0 8.8 5.4 < 1.0 10.0 <0.015 0.8 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
50th 30.8 10.7 10.2 6.3 < 1.0 11.0 <0.015 0.9 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
80th 35.4 16.0 11.2 9.2 < 1.0 14.0 <0.015 1.6 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
98th 40.5 23.2 13.2 13.6 < 1.0 17.0 <0.015 2.4 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
AM 29.6 12.2 9.9 7.0 < 1.0 11.3 <0.015 1.1 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
GM 28.9 11.0 9.8 6.7 < 1.0 10.9 <0.015 0.8 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
Standard Deviation 6.5 5.5 1.7 3.4 < 1.0 3.0 <0.015 0.7 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
95th 39.8 21.2 11.9 12.9 < 1.0 16.0 <0.015 2.3 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 90
Table 3.11: Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Result AAQ4 (Post Monsoon Season, Pre-Monsoon Season, Monsoon Season) (µg/m3)
Monitoring Period
Description PM10
(μg/m3) PM2.5
(μg/m3) SO2
(μg/m3) NOx
(μg/m3) CO
(mg/m3) Ozone
(μg/m3) Pb
(μg/m3) NH3
(μg/m3) Benzene (μg/m3)
BaP (ng/m3)
Arsenic (ng/m3)
Nickel (μg/m3)
Post- Monsoon Season
MIN 16.4 4.0 7.5 1.5 < 1.0 6.0 <0.015 0.4 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
MAX 23.2 10.2 14.2 11.6 < 1.0 20.0 <0.015 2.0 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
AVG 20.5 6.7 10.6 7.1 < 1.0 11.0 <0.015 1.2 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
10th 16.7 4.0 8.0 3.9 < 1.0 6.0 <0.015 0.6 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
20th 18.7 4.7 9.0 4.6 < 1.0 7.0 <0.015 0.7 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
30th 19.7 4.8 9.5 5.7 < 1.0 8.0 <0.015 0.8 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
50th 21.1 6.9 10.6 7.3 < 1.0 10.0 <0.015 1.0 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
80th 22.6 8.5 11.9 9.3 < 1.0 14.0 <0.015 1.8 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
98th 23.2 10.2 13.7 11.3 < 1.0 19.0 <0.015 2.0 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
AM 20.5 6.7 10.6 7.1 < 1.0 11.0 <0.015 1.2 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
GM 20.3 6.4 10.4 6.5 < 1.0 10.2 <0.015 1.1 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
Standard Deviation 2.3 2.0 1.8 2.6 < 1.0 4.1 <0.015 0.5 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
95th 23.1 9.7 13.1 10.7 < 1.0 17.5 <0.015 2.0 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
Pre -Monsoon Season
MIN 22.1 3.6 7.8 3.5 < 1.0 4.0 <0.015 0.3 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
MAX 44.7 14.8 14.0 13.4 < 1.0 16.0 <0.015 2.0 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
AVG 32.0 9.2 11.3 8.6 < 1.0 9.4 <0.015 1.0 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
10th 22.3 3.8 9.1 4.6 < 1.0 6.0 <0.015 0.5 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
20th 27.5 4.1 9.2 6.5 < 1.0 7.0 <0.015 0.6 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
30th 27.8 4.2 10.2 6.9 < 1.0 8.0 <0.015 0.8 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
50th 31.7 9.3 11.3 8.9 < 1.0 10.0 <0.015 1.0 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
80th 38.4 14.0 13.1 11.5 < 1.0 12.0 <0.015 1.5 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
98th 44.7 14.8 14.0 13.2 < 1.0 15.0 <0.015 2.0 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 91
Monitoring Period
Description PM10
(μg/m3) PM2.5
(μg/m3) SO2
(μg/m3) NOx
(μg/m3) CO
(mg/m3) Ozone
(μg/m3) Pb
(μg/m3) NH3
(μg/m3) Benzene (μg/m3)
BaP (ng/m3)
Arsenic (ng/m3)
Nickel (μg/m3)
AM 32.0 9.2 11.3 8.6 < 1.0 9.4 <0.015 1.0 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
GM 31.3 8.1 11.2 8.1 < 1.0 9.0 <0.015 0.9 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
Standard Deviation 6.8 4.3 1.9 2.9 < 1.0 2.9 <0.015 0.5 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
95th 43.6 14.6 13.9 12.9 < 1.0 14.0 <0.015 2.0 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
Monsoon Season
MIN 10.2 4.3 7.8 3.5 < 1.0 8.0 <0.015 0.1 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
MAX 34.0 20.7 13.0 13.1 < 1.0 16.0 <0.015 2.2 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
AVG 21.9 12.4 10.2 8.2 < 1.0 10.9 <0.015 1.0 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
10th 14.8 6.4 8.4 4.6 < 1.0 8.0 <0.015 0.5 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
20th 16.9 8.9 9.0 6.2 < 1.0 8.0 <0.015 0.5 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
30th 18.2 9.2 9.2 6.8 < 1.0 10.0 <0.015 0.6 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
50th 20.7 11.1 10.0 8.2 < 1.0 10.0 <0.015 0.9 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
80th 26.3 16.6 11.5 10.4 < 1.0 14.0 <0.015 1.2 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
98th 32.8 20.7 12.8 12.8 < 1.0 16.0 <0.015 2.1 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
AM 21.9 12.4 10.2 8.2 < 1.0 10.9 <0.015 1.0 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
GM 21.0 11.5 10.1 7.7 < 1.0 10.6 <0.015 0.8 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
Standard Deviation 6.0 4.9 1.5 2.7 < 1.0 2.6 <0.015 0.5 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
95th 31.2 20.3 12.4 12.4 < 1.0 15.5 <0.015 2.0 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 92
Table 3.12: Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Result AAQ5 (Post Monsoon Season, Pre-Monsoon Season, Monsoon Season) (µg/m3)
Monitoring Period Description
PM10 (μg/m3)
PM2.5 (μg/m3)
SO2 (μg/m3)
NOx (μg/m3)
CO (mg/m3)
Ozone (μg/m3)
Pb (μg/m3)
NH3 (μg/m3)
Benzene BaP (ng/m3)
Arsenic (ng/m3)
Nickel (μg/m3)
Post- Monsoon Season
MIN 16.5 4.7 7.7 1.9 < 1.0 4.0 <0.015 0.1 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
MAX 24.3 11.7 13.1 11.8 < 1.0 18.0 <0.015 2.0 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
AVG 20.6 7.8 10.7 7.5 < 1.0 10.0 <0.015 0.9 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
10th 16.9 4.8 9.2 4.6 < 1.0 6.5 <0.015 0.2 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
20th 18.8 5.3 9.2 5.8 < 1.0 8.0 <0.015 0.3 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
30th 19.9 6.0 10.0 6.7 < 1.0 8.0 <0.015 0.5 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
50th 20.7 7.5 11.0 7.7 < 1.0 10.0 <0.015 0.8 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
80th 23.1 10.0 11.9 8.9 < 1.0 12.0 <0.015 1.4 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
98th 24.3 11.7 13.0 11.6 < 1.0 17.0 <0.015 2.0 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
AM 20.6 7.8 10.7 7.5 < 1.0 10.0 <0.015 0.9 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
GM 20.4 7.5 10.6 7.1 < 1.0 9.5 <0.015 0.6 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
Standard Deviation 2.4 2.3 1.5 2.3 < 1.0 3.3 <0.015 0.6 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
95th 24.0 11.3 12.9 11.3 < 1.0 15.8 <0.015 2.0 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
Pre -Monsoon Season
MIN 16.3 4.6 7.8 3.0 < 1.0 4.0 <0.015 0.4 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
MAX 39.4 21.3 13.9 14.3 < 1.0 12.0 <0.015 2.0 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
AVG 27.0 12.7 10.6 7.6 < 1.0 8.4 <0.015 1.1 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
10th 17.9 5.0 8.1 4.0 < 1.0 6.0 <0.015 0.6 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
20th 20.0 6.1 9.0 5.0 < 1.0 6.0 <0.015 0.6 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
30th 21.9 7.0 9.1 5.9 < 1.0 7.0 <0.015 0.8 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
50th 26.6 11.4 10.6 7.4 < 1.0 8.0 <0.015 1.0 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
80th 34.3 19.1 12.8 9.6 < 1.0 10.0 <0.015 1.6 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
98th 38.3 21.1 13.9 13.3 < 1.0 12.0 <0.015 2.0 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 93
Monitoring Period Description
PM10 (μg/m3)
PM2.5 (μg/m3)
SO2 (μg/m3)
NOx (μg/m3)
CO (mg/m3)
Ozone (μg/m3)
Pb (μg/m3)
NH3 (μg/m3)
Benzene BaP (ng/m3)
Arsenic (ng/m3)
Nickel (μg/m3)
AM 27.0 12.7 10.6 7.6 < 1.0 8.4 <0.015 1.1 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
GM 26.1 11.1 10.4 7.0 < 1.0 8.0 <0.015 1.0 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
Standard Deviation 7.1 6.2 2.0 2.9 < 1.0 2.4 <0.015 0.5 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
95th 37.0 20.6 13.7 12.3 < 1.0 12.0 <0.015 2.0 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
Monsoon Season
MIN 9.1 4.0 7.6 3.9 < 1.0 5.0 <0.015 0.3 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
MAX 29.6 26.8 13.0 14.0 < 1.0 16.0 <0.015 1.5 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
AVG 19.1 11.1 10.2 8.3 < 1.0 9.8 <0.015 0.8 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
10th 10.9 4.3 8.7 4.6 < 1.0 7.5 <0.015 0.4 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
20th 13.8 6.7 9.1 5.4 < 1.0 8.0 <0.015 0.5 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
30th 15.4 7.0 9.2 6.2 < 1.0 8.5 <0.015 0.6 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
50th 18.0 9.8 10.4 7.5 < 1.0 10.0 <0.015 0.8 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
80th 26.0 15.8 11.3 12.3 < 1.0 12.0 <0.015 1.2 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
98th 29.3 24.7 12.7 13.8 < 1.0 14.0 <0.015 1.5 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
AM 19.1 11.1 10.2 8.3 < 1.0 9.8 <0.015 0.8 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
GM 18.0 9.6 10.2 7.7 < 1.0 9.6 <0.015 0.8 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
Standard Deviation 6.6 6.2 1.4 3.3 < 1.0 2.3 <0.015 0.4 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
95th 28.8 21.6 12.2 13.4 < 1.0 12.0 <0.015 1.4 <0.001 <0.001 <0.02 <0.1
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 94
3.4.5.2 Result Interpretation
PM10
o The concentration of PM10 varied from 10.9 to 32.9 μg/m3 in Post monsoon season. The
Post Monsoon lowest concentration of PM10 was found at AAQ2 while the maximum
concentration was found at AAQ 3 sampling site.
o The concentration of PM10 varied from 16.3 to 46.9 μg/m3 in Pre monsoon season. The Pre
Monsoon lowest concentration of PM10 was found at AAQ5 while the maximum
concentration was found at AAQ3 sampling site.
o The concentration of PM10 varied from 9.1 to 42.1 μg/m3 in monsoon season. The Monsoon
lowest concentration of PM10 was found at AAQ5 while the maximum concentration was
found at AAQ2 sampling site.
o The PM10 pollutant concentration is more in Premonsoon season (March to May 2021).
PM2.5
o PM2.5 concentrations varied from 3 to 11.7 μg/m3 in Post monsoon season. The lowest
concentration of AAQ3 PM2.5 was found at while the maximum concentration was found in
AAQ4 sampling site.
o PM2.5 concentrations varied from 4 to 21.3 μg/m3 in Pre monsoon season. The lowest
concentration of AAQ1 PM2.5 was found at while the maximum concentration was found in
AAQ4 sampling site.
o PM2.5 concentrations varied from 4 to 36.4 μg/m3 in monsoon season. The lowest
concentration of AAQ5 PM2.5 was found at while the maximum concentration was found in
AAQ1 sampling site.
SO2
o The concentration of Sulphur dioxide (SO2) varied from 4.4 to 14.2 μg/m3 in Post Monsoon
season. The concentration of Sulphur dioxide (SO2) was observed maximum at AAQ4 and
minimum at AAQ1.
o The concentration of Sulphur dioxide (SO2) varied from 7.8 to 15.3 μg/m3 in Pre Monsoon
season. The concentration of Sulphur dioxide (SO2) was observed maximum at AAQ4 and
minimum at AAQ2.
o The concentration of Sulphur dioxide (SO2) varied from 1.2 to 14.4 μg/m3 in Monsoon
season. The concentration of Sulphur dioxide (SO2) was observed maximum at AAQ2 and
minimum at AAQ3.
NO2
o The Concentration of Nitrogen dioxide (NO2) was observed in the range of 1.5 to 12.3 (post
Monsoon) μg/m3, the maximum concentration was found at AAQ2 while lowest
concentration was accounted at AAQ4.
o The Concentration of Nitrogen dioxide (NO2) was observed in the range of 3 to 14.3 (Pre
Monsoon) μg/m3, the maximum concentration was found at AAQ5 while lowest
concentration was accounted at AAQ5.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 95
o The Concentration of Nitrogen dioxide (NO2) was observed in the range of 00 to 14.1 (Pre
Monsoon) μg/m3, the maximum concentration was found at AAQ3 while lowest
concentration was accounted at AAQ3.
CO
o The concentration of Carbon monoxide (CO) varied from 00 to 00 mg/m3 in Post Monsoon
season, Maximum concentration of CO found at PPT Wet Basin, and lowest was found at
PPT Guest house.
o The concentration of Carbon monoxide (CO) varied from 00 to 00 mg/m3 in Pre Monsoon
season, Maximum concentration of CO found at PPT Wet Basin, and lowest was found at
PPT Guest house.
o The concentration of Carbon monoxide (CO) varied from 00 to 00 mg/m3 in Monsoon
season, Maximum concentration of CO found at PPT Wet Basin, and lowest was found at
PPT Guest house.
NH3
o The concentration of NH3 varied from 0.1 to 2.3 μg/m3 in Post Monsoon Season. Maximum
concentration of Ammonia (NH3) found at AAQ-3 and lowest was found at AAQ-5 sampling
site.
o The concentration of NH3 varied from 0.1 to 2.2 μg/m3 in Pre Monsoon Season. Maximum
concentration of Ammonia (NH3) found at AAQ-2 & 3 and lowest was found at AAQ-1 & 3
sampling site.
o The concentration of NH3 varied from 0.08 to 2.5 μg/m3 in Monsoon season. Maximum
concentration of Ammonia (NH3) found at AAQ-3 and lowest was found at AAQ-1 sampling
site
O3
o The concentration of O3 varied from 4 to 20 μg/m3 in Post Monsoon Season. Maximum
concentration of Ozone (O3) found at AAQ-2&4 and lowest was found at AAQ-1, 2, 3 &5
sampling site.
o The concentration of O3 varied from 4 to 16 μg/m3 in Post Monsoon Season. Maximum
concentration of Ozone (O3) found at AAQ-1, 4 & 5 and lowest was found at AAQ-2 , 3 & 4
sampling site.
o The concentration of O3 varied from 5 to 20 μg/m3 in Post Monsoon Season. Maximum
concentration of Ozone (O3) found at AAQ-2 and lowest was found at AAQ-5 sampling site.
In Bhavanapadu study area the major reasons include vehicular traffic and construction activities
towards contribution of air pollutants concentration.
Household emissions does not contribute much in study, the city has excellent LPG
connection/penetration both at commercial and household level.
DG sets do pose a slight challenge, as they use diesel and cause localized air pollution.
The dust emission (Particulate matter) contribution is more as compared to the gaseous emissions
SO2 , NO2. Overall the concentration of AAQ pollutant is well within the CPCB standard limits.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 96
3.5 WATER ENVIRONMENT
Selected ground water and surface water resources within study area has been studied for assessing the
water environment and evaluate anticipated impacts. The information required has been collected
through primary surveys and secondary sources. Six groundwater sources and six surface water source
within study area were examined for physic-chemical, heavy metals and bacteriological parameters in
order to assess the effect of existing industrial and other activities on water. The samples were collected
and analyzed once during the study period. Water sampling and analysis has been carried out to
determine the existing baseline water quality around the project area. Sampling has been done
following standard guidelines for physical, chemical and bacteriological parameters. Analysis was carried
out by following methods prescribed in “Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and
Wastewater (American Public Health Association)”.
DRAINAGE SYSTEM
The main rivers drain the district are Vamsadhara and Nagavali. The other important rivers flowing in
the district are Suvarnamukhi, Vegavati, Mahendra Tanya and Bahuda. Among the rivers Vamsadhara,
Nagavali and Suvarnamukhi are perennial. The general drainage pattern is dendritic to sub-dendritic and
occasionally parallel at places. The drainage in western part of the district resembles dendritic type,
where as in the central part it is parallel to sub-dendritic. The overall drainage is of medium to coarse
textured towards west and north of the district, whereas in central and southern parts it is very coarse.
The drainage density varies from less than 0.2 to 1 km/km2. In Palakonda area the density is of 0.6 to 1
km/km2 . While areas with a density of more than 0.2 km/sq.km are observed in Ichapuram, Sompeta,
Narasannapeta and Srikakulam. The density is less than 0.2 km/sq.km in plain area of Tekkali and in
parts of Pathapatnam. The drainage map of the study area is shown in the below Figure 3.16.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 97
Figure 3.16: Drainage map of the Study area
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 98
SURFACE WATER QUALITY
Bhavanapadu village, proposed site for port development is a coastal village in Srikakulam district. The
port is located along the Andhra Pradesh coast. Towards the right of the port lies the Bay of Bengal. The
samples were collected from the harbour site, beach side, nearby lake and pond in the study area. There
is no river that is flowing in the study area.
3.5.2.1 Sampling Locations for Surface Water Monitoring
Sampling locations were selected on basis of:
Drainage pattern
Location of residential areas respecting different activities
Likely areas those can represent baseline conditions
3.5.2.2 Methodology
The samples were analyzed in accordance with standard Methods for Examination of Water and
Wastewater Analysis published by APHA.
In order to assess water quality impacts surface water and ground water samples are collected from the
surrounding villages. The samples analyzed for various physical and chemical parameters to know the
contamination levels as per the IS Standards 2296.
The Surface Water Quality Sampling location are given in the Table 3.13 and the sampling photographs
are shown in the Figure 3.13.
Table 3.13: Surface Water Quality Monitoring Locations
Surface Water Quality Monitoring Locations
Sr. No.
Locations Sampling
Code Direction
Dist. (Km)
Coordinates
North East
1. Harbour SW1 S 0.61 18°32'21.24"N 84°20'17.95"E
2. Harbour SW2 SW 0.65 18°31'56.95"N 84°19'46.75"E
3. Near Bhavanapadu Beach near Devunalthada
SW3 NE 2.74 18°34'45.73"N 84°21'42.78"E
4. Pond Near Pundi Road SW4 N 3.45 18°35'8.55"N 84°19'50.08"E
5. Pond Near Routhupuram Viallge SW5 NNE 7.54 18°37'23.61"N 84°19'25.57"E
6. Lake Near Pedda Cheruvu Village SW6 NNE 8.45 18°38'4.00"N 84°21'21.42"E
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 99
Figure 3.17: Surface Water Quality Sampling Photographs
3.5.2.3 Analysis Result of Surface Water Sampling
Test results for surface water monitoring in all the 6 locations during Post-Monsoon 2020, Pre-Monsoon
2021 and Monsoon season 2021 are tabulated in Table 3.14 to 3.16 espectively
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 100
Table 3.14: Summary of Surface Water Quality Sampling (Post Monsoon Season)
Sr.No Parameter Units IS:2296 SW 1 SW 2 SW 3 SW 4 SW 5 SW 6
Class C Limits Harbour Harbour Near
Bhavanapadu Beach
Near Pundi Road
Near Routhupuram
Pedda Cheruvu
1 pH - 6.5 – 8.5 7.42 7.21 7.56 8.01 7.11 6.98
2 Color Hazen units 300 5 5 5 5 5 5
3 Total Dissolved Solids mg/l 1500 543 455 512 487 522 497
4 Total Hardness mg/l - 154 164 130 110 140 165
5 Chloride as Cl mg/l 600 432 315 406 330 475 380
6 Fluorides as F mg/l 1.5 0.02 0.03 0.01 0.02 0.05 0.01
7 Sulphate as SO4 mg/l 400 15.4 22 46.1 29.3 30.4 25
8 Alkalinity mg/l - 150 160 130 130 110 120
9 Nitrates as NO3 mg/l - 5.2 4.8 5 4.5 6.2 7
10 Cyanides as CN mg/l 0.05 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
11 Calcium as Ca mg/l -
34.6 40.2 42 38 60 44
12 Magnesium as Mg mg/l -
18 16 22 16 20 18
13 Iron as Fe mg/l 50 0.09 1.4 1.1 1.2 1.5 1.6
14 Total Chromium
(Cr)
mg/l 0.05 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
15 Cadmium as Cd mg/l 0.01 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
16 Lead as Pb mg/l 0.1 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
17 Copper as Cu mg/l 1.5 0.021 0.019 0.018 0.012 0.026 0.013
18 Arsenic as As mg/l 0.2 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
19 Selenium as Se mg/l 0.05 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
20 Phenolics as C6H5Oh mg/l 0.005 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
21 Zinc as Zn mg/l 5 0.012 0.018 0.016 0.02 0.011 0.021
22 Mercury as Hg mg/l -
<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 101
Sr.No Parameter Units IS:2296 SW 1 SW 2 SW 3 SW 4 SW 5 SW 6
Class C Limits Harbour Harbour Near
Bhavanapadu Beach
Near Pundi Road
Near Routhupuram
Pedda Cheruvu
23 Aluminum as Al mg/l -
<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
24 Anionic detergents as
MBAS
mg/l 0.12 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001
25 Odour - Unobjectionab
le
Unobject
ionable
Unobjectio
nable
Unobjectionable Unobjectiona
ble
Unobjectionabl
e
Unobject
ionable
26 Taste - Agreeable Agreeabl
e
Agreeable Agreeable Agreeable Agreeable Agreeabl
e
27 Turbidity NTU - 3 3 2.5 1.5 1.8 3.1
28 Residual Free Chlorine mg/l - <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
29 Manganese mg/l - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
30 Boron mg/l - 0.09 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.02
31 Mineral Oil mg/l - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
32 Pesticide Residue mg/l - absent absent absent absent absent absent
33 PAH - - 45 62 95 80 53 35
34 E.Coli - - absent absent absent absent absent absent
35 Total Coliforms MPN/100 ml Should not
exceed 5000
95 85 120 95 87 66
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 102
Table 3.15: Summary of Surface Water Quality Monitoring (Pre Monsoon Season)
Sr.No Parameter Units IS:2296 SW 1 SW 2 SW 3 SW 4 SW 5 SW 6
Class C Limits
Harbour Harbour Near
Bhavanapadu Beach
Near Pundi Road
Near Routhupuram
Pedda Cheruvu
1 pH - 6.5 – 8.5 7.36 7.64 7.5 7.96 7.84 6.85
2 Color Hazen
units
300 6 5 7 5 6 5
6 Total Dissolved
Solids
mg/l 1500 478 452 412 356 452 470
7 Total Hardness mg/l - 254 200 210 230 180 185
8 Chloride as Cl mg/l 600 320 300 345 325 374 400
9 Fluorides as F- mg/l 1.5 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.04 0.01
10 Sulphate as SO4- mg/l 400 25.6 22.3 35.6 35.4 30.2 38.5
11 Alkalinity mg/l - 185 160 200 254 225 220
12 Nitrates as NO3 mg/l - 4.7 6.8 5.4 7.5 6.1 8.2
13 Cyanides as CN mg/l 0.05 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001
14 Calcium as Ca mg/l - 42 54 44 54 60 60
15 Magnesium as
Mg
mg/l - 16 18 16 18 26 28
18 Iron as Fe mg/l 50 0.9 1.4 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.7
19 Total
Chromium(Cr)
mg/l 0.05 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
20 Cadmium as Cd mg/l 0.01 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
21 Lead as Pb mg/l 0.1 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
22 Copper as Cu mg/l 1.5 0.032 0.021 0.053 0.012 0.025 0.019
23 Arsenic as As mg/l 0.2 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
24 Selenium as Se mg/l 0.05 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
25 Phenolics as
C6H5Oh
mg/l 0.005 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
26 Zinc as Zn mg/l 5 0.015 0.011 0.009 0.012 0.009 0.011
27 Mercury as Hg mg/l - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 103
Sr.No Parameter Units IS:2296 SW 1 SW 2 SW 3 SW 4 SW 5 SW 6
Class C Limits
Harbour Harbour Near
Bhavanapadu Beach
Near Pundi Road
Near Routhupuram
Pedda Cheruvu
28 Aluminum as Al mg/l - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
29 Anionic
detergents as
MBAS
mg/l 0.12 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
33 Odour - -
Unobjectiona
ble
Unobjectiona
ble
Unobjectionabl
e
Unobjectionabl
e
Unobjectionabl
e
Unobjectiona
ble
34 Taste - - Agreeable Agreeable Agreeable Agreeable Agreeable Agreeable
35 Turbidity mg/l - 2 1.8 1.6 2 2.2 2.5
36 Residual Free
Chlorine
mg/l -
<0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
37 Manganese mg/l - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
38 Boron mg/l - 0.007 0.011 0.016 0.011 0.012 0.01
39 Mineral Oil mg/l - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
40 Pesticide
Residue
mg/l -
absent absent absent absent absent absent
41 PAH - - 40 52 85 72 52 35
42 E.Coli - - absent absent absent absent absent absent
43 Total Coliforms MPN/10
0 ml
Should not
exceed
5000
92 84 106 72 95 63
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 104
Table 3.16: Summary of Surface Water Quality Monitoring (Monsoon Season)
Sr.No Parameter Units IS:2296 SW 1 SW 2 SW 3 SW 4 SW 5 SW 6
Class C Limits
Harbour Harbour Near
Bhavanapadu Beach
Near Pundi Road
Near Routhupura
m Pedda Cheruvu
1 pH - 6.5 – 8.5 7.4 7.32 7.86 7.95 7.31 6.82
2 Color Hazen units 300 6 5 6 5 5 7
3 Total Dissolved Solids
mg/l 1500 513 482 412 400 426 458
4 Total Hardness
mg/l -
186 195 164 210 245 184
5 Chloride as Cl mg/l 600 350 380 256 285 452 365
6 Fluorides as F- mg/l 1.5 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01
7 Sulphate as SO4
-- mg/l 400 18.6 20.6 34.2 35.6 25.7 30.9
8 Alkalinity mg/l - 165 185 145 145 135 160
9 Nitrates as NO3
mg/l -
4.2 4.8 5.2 3.8 5.4 4.6
10 Cyanides as CN
mg/l 0.05 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001
11 Calcium as Ca mg/l - 36.2 44 40 38 56.2 40.2
12 Magnesium as Mg
mg/l -
18 14 16 14 22 20
13 Iron as Fe mg/l 50 0.82 1.64 1.25 1.67 1.23 1.47
14 Total Chromium(Cr)
mg/l 0.05 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
15 Cadmium as Cd
mg/l 0.01 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
18 Lead as Pb mg/l 0.1 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
19 Copper as Cu mg/l 1.5 0.021 0.016 0.032 0.028 0.015 0.012
20 Arsenic as As mg/l 0.2 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
21 Selenium as Se
mg/l 0.05 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
22 Phenolics as mg/l 0.005 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 105
Sr.No Parameter Units IS:2296 SW 1 SW 2 SW 3 SW 4 SW 5 SW 6
Class C Limits
Harbour Harbour Near
Bhavanapadu Beach
Near Pundi Road
Near Routhupura
m Pedda Cheruvu
C6H5Oh
23 Zinc as Zn mg/l 5 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
24 Mercury as Hg mg/l - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
25 Aluminum as Al
mg/l - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
26 Anionic detergents as MBAS
mg/l 0.12 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
27 Odour - - Unobjectiona
ble Unobjectiona
ble Unobjectionable Unobjectionabl
e Unobjectiona
ble Unobjectionabl
e
28 Taste - - Agreeable Agreeable Agreeable Agreeable Agreeable Agreeable
29 Turbidity mg/l - 3.4 2.8 1.4 2 1.6 3.5
33 Residual Free Chlorine
mg/l -
<0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
34 Manganese mg/l - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
35 Boron mg/l - 0.012 0.024 0.018 0.013 0.04 0.02
36 Mineral Oil mg/l - Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil
37 Pesticide Residue
mg/l -
absent absent absent absent absent absent
38 PAH - - 54 68 104 87 50 27
39 E.Coli - - absent absent absent absent absent absent
40 Total Coliforms
MPN/100 ml
Should not exceed 5000
100 88 150 95 85 53
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 106
3.5.2.4 Result Interpretation
Following is the surface water sampling result summary
The pH values of all analysed samples ranged from 6.5-8.5 in all three seasons and were well within
the permissible limit (6.5-8.5).
It was observed that colour ranged lowest 5 and Maximum 7 in pre monsoon and monsoon season
and ranged 5 at all location in post monsoon season, odour was unobjectionable at all the locations
for all seasons.
The TDS levels ranged from 455 to 543 mg/l (Post Monsoon), 356 to 478 mg/l (Pre-Monsoon) and
from 400 to 513 mg/l. It was observed that the TDS levels were well below the desirable limit of
1500 mg/l at all locations for all seasons.
The Chloride levels in surface water samples ranged from 34.6 to 60 mg/l (Post Monsoon), from 300
to 400 mg/ (Pre-Monsoon) , from 256 to 452 mg/l (Monsoon) and were observed that the chloride
levels were more than the desired limit of 250 mg/l in pre monsoon and monsoon season.
The Sulphate levels ranged from 15.4 to 46.1 mg/l (Post Monsoon), from 22.3 to 38.5 mg/I (Pre-
Monsoon), from 18.6 to 35.6 mg/l (Monsoon) l and were below the desirable limit of 400 mg/l.
The fluorides level ranged between 0.01 to 0.05 mg/l (Post Monsoon), from 0.01 to 0.04 mg/ (Pre-
Monsoon), from 0.01 to 0.02 mg/l (Post Monsoon) and were observed within desirable limit of 1.5
mg/l.
The Nitrate level ranged between 4.5 to 7 mg/I (Post Monsoon), ranged between 4.7 to 8.2 mg/l
(Post Monsoon) and from 3.8 to 5.4 mg/l (Post Monsoon) and was lower than the desirable limit of
45 mg/l.
Heavy metals like Mercury, Lead and Cadmium were found below detection limits.
GROUND WATER QUALITY
3.5.3.1 Sampling Location for Ground Water Monitoring
Sampling locations were selected on basis of:
Drainage pattern
Location of residential areas respecting different activities
Likely areas those can represent baseline conditions
The Ground Water Quality Sampling Locations are given in Table 3:17 and shown in the Figure 3.10
above.
3.5.3.2 Methodology
The samples were analyzed in accordance with standard Methods for Examination of Water and
Wastewater Analysis published by APHA.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 107
In order to assess water quality impacts surface water and ground water samples are collected from the
surrounding villages. The samples analyzed for various physical and chemical parameters to know the
contamination levels as per the IS Standards 10500-2012.
Table 3.17: Details of Ground Water Quality Sampling Locations Ground Water Quality Monitoring Locations
Sr. No.
Locations Sampling Code
Direction Dist. (Km)
Coordinates
North East
1. Near Bhavnapadu Harbour Road
GW1 N 3.54 18°35'27.83"N 84°21'35.27"E
2. Project site GW2 SW 0.22 18°32'0.08"N 84°18'52.50"E
3. Near Khaspanaupadu Village GW3 WSW 3.78 18°33'42.58"N 84°18'1.66"E
4. Near Pathanoupada Village GW4 WNW 7.35 18°36'5.35"N 84°17'44.04"E
5. Near Devda Village Village
GW5 NNW 7.97 18°37'48.12"N 84°20'41.40"E
6. Near Dabbalapadu Village
GW6 N 7.63 18°37'38.39"N 84°21'53.88"E
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 108
3.5.3.3 Analysis Result of Ground Water Sampling
Test results for ground water monitoring in all the 6 locations during Post-Monsoon, Pre-Monsoon and Monsoon season are tabulated in Table
3.18 to Table 3.20 respectively.
Table 3.18: Summary of Ground Water Monitoring Results (Post Monsoon Season)
S.No
Parameter Unit
Near Bhavnapadu
Harbour Road Project site
Near Khaspanaupa
du
Near Pathanoupada
Near Devda Village
Near Dabbalapadu
10500 specifications RA 2012
GW 1 GW 2 GW 3 GW 4 GW 5 GW 6
1 pH -- 7.77 8.1 7.87 8 7.98 8.19 6.5-8.5
2 Turbidity NTU 3.0 NTU 2.5 NTU 2.0 NTU 2.5 NTU 2.7 NTU 3.0 NTU 5-10
3 EC µMho/c
m 778 684 612 674 763 622
4 TSS mg/l 15 20 14 10 15 12
5 TDS mg/l 352 344 370 365 355 342
6 Total Alkalinity as CaCO3
mg/l 104 102 108 122 110 118
7 Chlorides as Cl- mg/l 295 280 270 240 285 270 250-1000
8 Sulphates as SO4-2 mg/l 24 14 18 22 34 24 200-400
9 Nitrates as NO3 mg/l 14 12 16 14 12 16 45
10 Phosphates as PO4 mg/l 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.01
11 Total Hardness as CaCO3
mg/l 180 150 172 182 174 188 200-600
12 Calcium as Ca mg/l 40 42 44 36 36 38 75-200
13 Magnesium as Mg mg/l 12 14 20 18 16 14 30-100
14 Sodium as Na mg/l 84 75 92 84 80 78
15 Potassium as K mg/l 8 12 9 11 8 12
16 Flourides as F- mg/l 0.1 0.2 0.09 0.1 0.2 0.08 1-1.5
17 Iron as Fe mg/l 0.05 0.08 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.04 0.3-1
18 Phenolic Compounds
mg/l <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.001-0.002
19 Cyanide as CN- mg/l 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.005
20 Residual Chlorine as Cl-
mg/l 0.02 0.03 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.04 - 0.2
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 109
S.No
Parameter Unit
Near Bhavnapadu
Harbour Road Project site
Near Khaspanaupa
du
Near Pathanoupada
Near Devda Village
Near Dabbalapadu
10500 specifications RA 2012
GW 1 GW 2 GW 3 GW 4 GW 5 GW 6
21 Cadmium as Cd mg/l <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.01
22 Total Chromium as Cr
mg/l <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.05
23 Lead as Pb mg/l <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.05
24 Zinc as Zn mg/l 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
5-15
25 Manganese as Mn mg/l 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.06 30-100
26 Copper as Cu mg/l 0.152 0.156 0.118 0.124 0.102 0.113 0.05-1.5
27 Nickel as Ni mg/l 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.05 0.06 3.0-5.0
28 Colour Hazen <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 5.00
29 Taste - Agreeable Agreeable Agreeable Agreeable Agreeable Agreeable Agreeable
30 Odor - Unobjection
able Unobjection
able Unobjection
able Unobjection
able Unobjection
able Unobjection
able Unobjectionable
31 Boron mg/l 0.05 0.1 0.05 0.08 0.07 0.1 1.00
32 Anionic Detergents mg/l <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.20
33 Mineral Oil mg/l <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.01
34 Aluminium as Al mg/l <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.03
35 Mercury as Hg mg/l <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.00
36 Pesticides mg/l <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 Absent
37 Total coliforms Mpn/100
ml Absent Absent Absent Absent Absent Absent Absent
38 E-Coli -- Absent Absent Absent Absent Absent Absent Absent
39 Selenium Se mg/l <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 110
Table 3.19: Summary of Ground Water Monitoring Results (Pre Monsoon Season)
S.No
Parameter Unit Near Bhavanapad
u Harbour Road
Project site
Near Khaspanaup
adu
Near Pathanoupa
da
Near Devda Village
Near Dabbalapad
u
10500 specifications RA 2012
GW 1 GW 2 GW 3 GW 4 GW 5 GW 6
1 pH -- 7.12 7.65 7.9 8.01 6.98 7.12 6.5-8.5
2 Turbidity NTU 2.5 NTU 2.2 NTU 1.8 NTU 2.0 NTU 2.3 NTU 2.5 NTU 5-10
3 EC µMho/cm
845 774 762 824 863 782
4 TSS mg/l 12 15 16 8 11 14
5 TDS mg/l 366 351 320 386 374 396
6 Total Alkalinity as CaCO3
mg/l 95 106 100 105 100 102
7 Chlorides as Cl- mg/l 305 320 295 280 300 290 250-1000
8 Sulphates as SO4-2 mg/l 22 18 16 20 24 22 200-400
9 Nitrates as NO3 mg/l 12 10 18 16 14 12 45
10 Phosphates as PO4 mg/l 0.008 0.01 0.08 0.01 0.01 0.009
11 Total Hardness as CaCO3
mg/l 202 195 186 200 182 195 200-600
12 Calcium as Ca mg/l 44 40 42 32 40 40 75-200
13 Magnesium as Mg mg/l 14 12 16 14 14 12 30-100
14 Sodium as Na mg/l 70 70 84 82 90 82
15 Potassium as K mg/l 10 10 8 12 12 10
16 Flourides as F- mg/l 0.07 0.12 0.1 0.12 0.15 0.08 1-1.5
17 Iron as Fe mg/l 0.02 0.06 0.09 0.07 0.08 0.06 0.3-1
18 Phenolic Compounds
mg/l <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.001-0.002
19 Cyanide as CN- mg/l <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.005
20 Residual Chlorine as Cl-
mg/l 0.02 0.02 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.03 0.2
21 Cadmium as Cd mg/l <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.01
22 Total Chromium as Cr
mg/l <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.05
23 Lead as Pb mg/l <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.05
24 Zinc as Zn mg/l 0.011 0.017 0.02 0.021 0.014 0.02 5-15
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 111
S.No
Parameter Unit Near Bhavanapad
u Harbour Road
Project site
Near Khaspanaup
adu
Near Pathanoupa
da
Near Devda Village
Near Dabbalapad
u
10500 specifications RA 2012
GW 1 GW 2 GW 3 GW 4 GW 5 GW 6
25 Manganese as Mn mg/l 0.038 0.045 0.035 0.042 0.044 0.052 30-100
26 Copper as Cu mg/l 0.11 0.147 0.101 0.118 0.106 0.123 0.05-1.5
27 Nickel as Ni mg/l 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.06 3.0-5.0
28 Colour Hazen <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 5.00
29 Taste - Agreeable Agreeable Agreeable Agreeable Agreeable Agreeable Agreeable
30 Odor -
Unobjectionable
Unobjectionable
Unobjectionable
Unobjectionable
Unobjectionable
Unobjectionable
Unobjectionable
31 Boron mg/l 0.04 0.08 0.02 0.06 0.09 0.09 1.00
32 Anionic Detergents mg/l <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.20
33 Mineral Oil mg/l <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.01
34 Aluminium as Al mg/l <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.03
35 Mercury as Hg mg/l <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.00
36 Pesticides mg/l <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 Absent
37 Total coliforms Mpn/100ml
Absent Absent Absent Absent Absent Absent Absent
38 E-Coli -- Absent Absent Absent Absent Absent Absent Absent
39 Selenium Se mg/l <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 112
Table 3.20: Summary of Ground Water Monitoring Results (Monsoon Season)
S.No
Parameter Unit
Near Bhavnapadu
Fishing Harbour
Road
Project site Near
Khaspanaupadu
Near Pathanoupa
da
Near Devda Village
Near Dabbalapadu
10500 specifications
RA 2012
GW 1 GW 2 GW 3 GW 4 GW 5 GW 6
1 pH -- 7.14 7.25 7.22 7.67 7.01 7.37 6.5-8.5
2 Turbidity NTU 2.2 NTU 2.0NTU 2.1 NTU 2.2 NTU 2.4 NTU 2.5 NTU 5-10
3 EC µMho/cm
675 624 712 680 720 724
4 TSS mg/l 8 10 12 13 14 15
5 TDS mg/l 290 313 320 332 360 342
6 Total Alkalinity as CaCO3
mg/l 105 105 100 108 110 105
7 Chlorides as Cl- mg/l 245 245 234 250 237 225 250-1000
8 Sulphates as SO4-2 mg/l 18 20 14 18 22 24 200-400
9 Nitrates as NO3 mg/l 15 18 13 12 14 14 45
10 Phosphates as PO4 mg/l 0.012 0.014 0.018 0.021 0.024 0.017
11 Total Hardness as CaCO3
mg/l 180 185 170 185 195 180 200-600
12 Calcium as Ca mg/l 40 36 36 40 42 38 75-200
13 Magnesium as Mg mg/l 12 14 16 18 18 16 30-100
14 Sodium as Na mg/l 64 65 75 78 72 68
15 Potassium as K mg/l 8 7 8 10 6 8
16 Flourides as F- mg/l 0.05 0.07 0.06 0.08 0.12 0.04 1-1.5
17 Iron as Fe mg/l 0.021 0.032 0.027 0.032 0.028 0.035 0.3-1
18 Phenolic Compounds
mg/l <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.001-0.002
19 Cyanide as CN- mg/l <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.005
20 Residual Chlorine as Cl-
mg/l 0.011 0.012 0.013 0.023 0.034 0.012 0.2
21 Cadmium as Cd mg/l <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.01
22 Total Chromium as Cr
mg/l <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.05
23 Lead as Pb mg/l <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.05
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 113
S.No
Parameter Unit
Near Bhavnapadu
Fishing Harbour
Road
Project site Near
Khaspanaupadu
Near Pathanoupa
da
Near Devda Village
Near Dabbalapadu
10500 specifications
RA 2012
GW 1 GW 2 GW 3 GW 4 GW 5 GW 6
24 Zinc as Zn mg/l 0.009 0.012 0.01 0.01 0.012 0.011 5-15
25 Manganese as Mn mg/l 0.035 0.04 0.045 0.032 0.026 0.03 30-100
26 Copper as Cu mg/l 0.082 0.095 0.105 0.102 0.1104 0.095 0.05-1.5
27 Nickel as Ni mg/l 0.018 0.015 0.024 0.026 0.014 0.019 3.0-5.0
28 Colour Hazen <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 5.00
29 Taste - Agreeable Agreeable agreeable Agreeable agreeable agreeable Agreeable
30 Odor -
Unobjectionable
Unobjectionable
Unobjectionable
Unobjectionable
Unobjectionable
Unobjectionable Unobjectionab
le
31 Boron mg/l 0.03 0.05 0.05 0.08 0.06 0.05 1.00
32 Anionic Detergents mg/l <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.20
33 Mineral Oil mg/l <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.01
34 Aluminium as Al mg/l <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.03
35 Mercury as Hg mg/l <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.00
36 Pesticides mg/l <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 Absent
37 Total coliforms Mpn/100ml
Absent Absent Absent Absent Absent Absent Absent
38 E-Coli -- Absent Absent Absent Absent Absent Absent Absent
39 Selenium Se mg/l <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 114
3.5.3.3.1 Results Interpretation
Physico-chemical characteristics of ground water samples collected from the selected
villages during October to December 2020 (Post-Monsoon Season), April to June 2021 (Pre-
monsoon Season) and July to September 2021 (Monsoon Season) has been compared with
the drinking water standard (IS 10500: 2012).
The analysis results indicate that the pH ranged between 7.77 to 8.19 in Post Monsoon
season and between 6.98 to 8.01 in Pre-Monsoon and between 7.1 to 7.67 in monsoon is
well within the specified standard of 6.5 to 8.5 limit i.e alkaline.
Total Hardness was recorded to range from 150 to 188 mg/I (Post Monsoon) , from 182 to
202 mg/I (Pre-Monsoon) and from 170 to 195 mg/I (Monsoon) which is well within the
permissible limit pf 200-600 mg/l at all locations.
The Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) concentration recorded ranged between 342 to 370 mg/I
(Post Monsoon), between 320 to 396 mg/l (Pre-Monsoon), between 290 to 360 mg/I
(Monsoon) and was within the desirable limits (500 mg/l).
Chlorides at all the locations were within the desirable limits (250-1000mg/l) as it ranged
between 240– 295 mg/I in Post Monsoon Season, 280 – 320 mg/I in Pre-Monsoon Season,
and between 225 – 250 mg/I in Monsoon season.
Sulphates at all the locations were within the permissible limits (200-400mg/l) as it ranged
between 14 – 34 mg/l in Post Monsoon Season, 16 – 24 mg/l in Pre- Monsoon Season and
14 – 24 mg/l in Monsoon Season).
Fluorides recorded ranges from 0.08 to 0.2 mg/l in Post Monsoon Season, from 0.07 to 0.15
mg/l in Pre-Monsoon Season and 0.04 to 0.12 mg/l in Monsoon Season which is below the
permissible limit of 1-1.5 mg/l. If the fluoride content is less than 0.6 mg/l it causes dental
caries. If it is above 1.5 mg/l it causes staining of tooth enamel, higher concentration in
range of 3-10 mg/l causes fluorosis.
Nitrates were recorded to be ranging in between 12 to 16 mg/l (Post Monsoon), 10 to 18
mg/l (Pre-Monsoon), 12 to 18 mg/l (Monsoon) and are found to be within the desirable limit
of 45mg/l.
Bacteriological studies reveal that no coliform bacterial are present in the samples.
The heavy metal contents were observed to be in below detectable limits.
All physical and general parameters were observed within the desirable limit at all sampling
locations as per IS10500:2012. Concentration of all parameters recorded in the ground
water samples for all locations were within the permissible limit of IS 10500:2012 drinking
water standards.
Apart from domestic sources, there are no sources of pollution in the project area. The
project area has no industries and the fertilizer consumption is low.
Thus, it is recommended that water be filtered and disinfected prior to be given to villages
for meeting their drinking water requirements.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 115
3.6 SOIL QUALITY
The predominant soils in Srikakulam district are red soils, red loams, sandy loams, sandy soils, black soils
and alluvial soils. Red soils which are derived from the weathering of khondalites and gneissic rocks
occur mostly along hill slopes. The narrow valleys and low lying areas between the hills are also covered
with red loamy soils. Sandy soils are seen occurring in the southern and eastern parts of the district. The
deltaic alluvial soil is seen distributed along the banks of the rivers Vamsadhara, Nagavalli and their
tributaries. The coastal alluvial soils are seen in the coastal tracts of the district in parts of Ichapuram,
Sompeta and Tekkali area. The red sand and lateritic soils are mostly distributed throughout the district.
Source: http://cgwb.gov.in/District_Profile/AP/Srikakulam.pdf
SAMPLING & METHODOLOGY FOR MONITORING
3.6.1.1 Soil Sampling
Soils vary from place to place. In view of this, efforts should be made to take the samples in such a
way that it is fully representative of the field. Scrap away surface litter; obtain a uniformly thick slice
of soil from the surface to the plough depth from each place. A V-shaped cut is made with a spade
to remove 1 to 2 cm slice of soil.
The sample may be collected on the blade of the spade and put in a clean bucket. In this way collect
samples from all the spots marked for one sampling unit. In case of hard soil, samples are taken
with the help of augur from the plough depth and collected in the bucket. Pour the soil from the
bucket on a piece of clean paper or cloth and mix thoroughly. Spread the soil evenly and divide it
into 4 quarters. Reject two opposite quarters and mix the rest of the soil again. Repeat the process
till left with about half kg of the soil, collect it and put in a clean cloth / polyethylene bag. Each bag
should be properly marked to identify the sample.
3.6.1.2 Storage Technique
Collected Samples are immediately transported to the laboratory. They are shade dried in wooden or
enamelled trays (except for the analysis of moisture content) and stored. The dried soils are ground
using mortar and pestle (taking care to break only the clods but not the sand and gravel particles) and
sieved through a 2mm mesh sieve.
3.6.1.3 Soil Quality Parameters and Method of Analysis
The soil samples were taken from 30cm, 60cm and 90cm depth from all the locations.
Five sampling locations were selected to assess the existing soil conditions representing various land use
conditions and geological features. At each location, soil samples were collected from three different
depths viz. 30 cm, 60 cm and 90 cm below the surface and are homogenized.
This is in line with Manual of Soil Testing in India, Department of Agriculture & Cooperation. Ministry of
Agriculture, Government of India, New Delhi, IS: 2720 & Methods of Soil Analysis, Part-1, 2nd edition,
1986 of (American Society for Agronomy and Soil Science Society of America) shall be followed for
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 116
collection of soil samples, its preparation for testing and analysing various physico-chemical properties
of soil.
The homogenized samples were analyzed for physical and chemical characteristics. The soil samples
were collected and analyzed once in the season for three seasons. The samples have been analyzed as
per the established scientific methods for physicochemical parameters
Table 3.21: Methods for Analysis of Soil Properties
S.N. Parameters Methods of Analysis
Physical Parameters
1 Moisture content (%) Gravimetric
2 Water Holding Capacity (%) Gravimetric
3 Bulk Density (%) Gravimetric
4 Texture Hydrometer Method
Chemical Parameters
5 pH Electrometric (pH meter)
6 EC (μS/m) Electrometric
7 Acidity (mg/kg) Titrimetric
8 Alkanity (mg/kg) Titrimetric
9 Chloride(mg/kg) Titrimetric
10 Calcium (mg/kg) Titrimetric
11 Magnesium (mg/kg) Titrimetric
12 Sodium(mg/kg) Flame Photometer
13 Potassium(mg/kg) Flame Photometer
14 Available Potassium(mg/kg) Flame Photometer
15 Sulphate(mg/kg) Spectrophotometer
16 Nitrate(mg/kg) Kjedahl
17 Phosphate(mg/kg) Bray’s Extractant
18 Available Phosphorus(mg/kg) Spectrophotometer
19 Organic Carbon (%) Wet Digestion
PROTOCOL FOR ASSESSMENT OF SOIL PHYSICO-CHEMICAL PROPERTIES
Methods Manual of Soil Testing in India, Department of Agriculture& Cooperation, Ministry of
Agriculture, Government of India, New Delhi, shall be followed for collection of soil samples, its
preparation for testing and analyzing various physico-chemical properties of soil.
SELECTION CRITERIA FOR SOIL SAMPLING LOCATION
For studying soil quality of the study area and with a view to ascertain the impacts due to construction
activities on the nearby agriculture land forest land, eight sampling locations, representing various land
use conditions, were selected to assess the existing soil conditions in and around the project area of
impact area. The location of the soil samples is presented in
Table 3.22 and shown in Figure 3.18.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 117
Table 3.22: Soil Sampling Locations
Sr. No. Locations Sampling
Code Direction Dist. (Km)
Coordinates
North East
1. Project site S1 - - 18°31'55.07"N 84°19'1.45"
2. Near Devunalthada Village S2 NNE 2.46 18°34'48.33"N 84°21'30.56"E
3. Near Mulapeta Village S3 SW 3.23 18°30'8.95"N 84°16'59.71"E
4. Near Naupada Village S4 WNW 4.27 18°33'46.18"N 84°17'46.30"E
5. Near Naupada Village S5 WNW 5.6 18°34'31.20"N 84°17'25.39"E
6. Near Patha Agraharam Village S6 NW 5.6 18°35'58.81"N 84°19'11.83"E
7. Near Routhupuram Village S7 NW 7.92 18°37'25.58"N 84°19'9.03"E
8. Near Sailada Village S8 NNW 6.54 18°37'6.20"N 84°20'30.44"E
Figure 3.18: Soil Quality Sampling Photographs
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 118
SOIL REACTION CLASSES, NUTRIENTS AVAILABILITY AND CRITICAL LIMITS
According to Soil Survey Manual (IARI, 1970), the soils are grouped under different soil reaction classes
range of macro and micro nutrients, organic carbon, SAR and electrical conductivity, which are extracted
in Table 3.23.
Table 3.23: Range of Soil Reaction Class, Micro and Macro Nutrients
S.N Soil Nutrients Soil Fertility Range
Low Medium High
1 Organic carbon as a measure of available Nitrogen
(%)
<0.5 0.5-0.75 >0.75
2 Available N (kg/ha) <280 280-560 >560
3 Available P (Kg/ha) <10 10-24.6 >24.6
4 Available K (kg/ha) <108 108-280 >280
5 Soil
Reactivity
Extremely acidi
c
Very strongly
acidic
Strongly acidic
Moderately
acidic
Slightly acidic
Neutral Slightly alkalin
e
Moderately
alkaline
Strongly alkaline
pH Range <4.5 4.5 –5.0 5.1 – 5.5 5.6-6.0 6.1-6.5 6.6-
7.3 7.4-7.8 7.9-8.4 8.5-9.0
6 Micro Nutrients
Critical Levels
(Deficient)
Critical Levels
(Sufficient)
(i) Available Zinc (mg/l) <0.6 >0.6
(ii) Available Boron (mg/l) <0.5 >0.5
(iii) Available Iron (mg/l) <4.5 >4.5
(iv) Available Manganese (mg/l) <1.0 >1.0
(v) Available Copper (mg/l) <0.5 >0.5
7 Sodium Absorption Ratio
Excellent <1.0 Good 1-1.9 Fair 2- 3.9 Poor 4-7.9 Very Poor 8-14.9 Unacceptable>15
8 Electrical Conductivity (mS/cm)
Salt free (0-2) Salinity
effect negligible
Slightly Saline (4-8) Yield of
many crops restricted
Moderately Saline (8-
15) Only tolerant crops
yield
satisfactorily
Highly Saline >15, Only
very tolerant crops yield
satisfactorily
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 119
SOIL ANALYSIS RESULT
The samples have been collected from the depth of 30cm, 60cm and 90cm and representative samples
prepared by thoroughly mixing. The homogenized samples were analyzed for physico chemical
characteristics. The physical and chemical analysis results of the soil samples collected at site during
Post-Monsoon 2020, Pre-Monsoon 2021 and Monsoon season 2021 as presented in Table 3.24 to Table
3.26.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 120
Table 3.24: Summary of Soil Quality Monitoring of One Season in Study area (Post Monsoon Season) Sr.No PARAMETERS UNIT S 1 S 2 S 3 S 4 S5 S6 S7 S8
30 Centimeters
1.
Texture - - - - - - - - -
Sand % 16 14 18 16 17 12 16 14
Silt % 56 55 62 59 54 57 50 58
Clay % 22 21 20 24 23 26 22 18
2. pH (10% Slurry) - 5.4 5.6 5.7 6.1 5.9 5.5 5.4 5.7
3. Organic Matter % 1.12 1.2 1.05 1.15 1.12 1.2 1.09 1.03
4. S.A.R meq/kg 3.4 3 2.6 2.4 2.5 2.2 2.8 2.4
5. Sodium as Na mg/kg 25 30 25 30 27 24 25 22
6. Phosphorus as P Kg/ha 24 22 24 24 28 22 28 28
7. Potassium as K Kg/ha 246.4 201.6 179.2 288.8 224 313.6 246.4 313.6
8. Chloride as Cl mg/kg 40 36 30 34 36 28 30 32
9. Zinc as Zn mg/kg 0.48 0.65 0.24 0.26 0.15 0.26 0.42 0.38
10. Copper as Cu. mg/kg 0.21 0.24 0.36 0.27 0.23 0.16 0.31 0.27
11. Iron as Fe mg/kg 5.1 4.8 4.8 4.4 5.1 5.2 4.6 5.2
12. Nitrogen as N Kg/ha 513.6 470.4 448 492.8 448 470.4 515.2 470.4
13. Selenm as Se mg/kg <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
14. Fluorine as F mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
15. Chromium as Cr mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
16. Molybdenum as Mo mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
17. Nickel as Ni mg/kg <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
18. Silicon as Si mg/kg 20 26 22 24 25 18 20 22
19. Calcium as Ca mg/kg 70 64 64 56 62 66 60 66
20. Phosphorus as P mg/kg 18 16 24 23 21 22 20 23
21. Magnesium as Mg mg/kg 135 124 125 124 124 132 136 136
22. Sulphur as S mg/kg 25 20 24 26 20 20 22 23
Sr.No PARAMETERS UNIT S 1 S 2 S 3 S 4 S5 S6 S7 S8
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 121
Sr.No PARAMETERS UNIT S 1 S 2 S 3 S 4 S5 S6 S7 S8
60 Centimeters
1.
Texture - - - - - - - - -
Sand % 15 12 16 14 17 14 16 12
Silt % 54 57 50 58 54 55 52 56
Clay % 26 26 22 18 21 24 20 20
2. pH (10% Slurry) - 5.4 5.5 5.4 5.7 5.9 5.5 5.4 5.7
3. Organic Matter % 1.11 1.06 1.01 1.02 1.04 1.04 1.02 1.01
4. S.A.R meq/kg 3.2 2.9 2 2 2.1 2 2.1 2
5. Sodium as Na mg/kg 22 28 26 28 25 22 26 27
6. Phosphorus as P Kg/ha 26 28 24 24 28 22 28 22
7. Potassium as K Kg/ha 180.20 224 268.8 179.2 268.8 316.8 246.4 268.8
8. Chloride as Cl mg/kg 44 36 33 38 34 36 30 38
9. Zinc as Zn mg/kg 0.48 0.65 0.24 0.26 0.15 0.26 0.42 0.38
10. Copper as Cu. mg/kg 0.28 0.24 0.36 0.21 0.24 0.19 0.31 0.26
11. Iron as Fe mg/kg 5.1 4.8 4.8 4.4 5.1 5.2 4.6 5.2
12. Nitrogen as N Kg/ha 470.4 537.6 448 448 448 470.4 448 492.8
13. Selenm as Se mg/kg <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
14. Fluorine as F mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
15. Chromium as Cr mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
16. Molybdenum as Mo mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
17. Nickel as Ni mg/kg <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
18. Silicon as Si mg/kg 23 18 24 20 22 23 21 20
19. Calcium as Ca mg/kg 66 62 60 66 72 72 68 64
20. Phosphorus as P mg/kg 23 24 21 25 16 18 20 22
21. Magnesium as Mg mg/kg 130 128 120 128 126 130 134 136
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 122
Sr.No PARAMETERS UNIT S 1 S 2 S 3 S 4 S5 S6 S7 S8
22. Sulphur as S mg/kg 22 22 28 20 24 27 22 25
Sr.No PARAMETERS UNIT S 1 S 2 S 3 S 4 S5 S6 S7 S8
90 Centimeters
1.
Texture - - - - - - - - -
Sand % 14 10 14 12 15 14 14 15
Silt % 52 55 52 54 52 50 52 52
Clay % 28 24 26 22 24 22 22 22
2. pH (10% Slurry) - 5.6 5.7 5.6 5.7 5.4 5.5 5.4 5.7
3. Organic Matter % 1.01 0.02 1 1.03 1.01 1.02 1.01 1.01
4. S.A.R meq/kg 2.2 1.96 2.1 1.99 1.96 1.87 1.88 1.98
5. Sodium as Na mg/kg 22 28 26 28 25 22 26 27
6. Phosphorus as P Kg/ha 24 28 22 24 28 26 28 24
7. Potassium as K Kg/ha 156.8 246.4 246.4 179.2 134.4 246.4 246.4 291.2
8. Chloride as Cl mg/kg 44 36 33 38 34 36 30 38
9. Zinc as Zn mg/kg 0.48 0.65 0.24 0.26 0.15 0.26 0.42 0.38
10. Copper as Cu. mg/kg 0.19 0.31 0.36 0.21 0.24 0.19 0.31 0.26
11. Iron as Fe mg/kg 5.1 4.8 4.8 4.4 5.1 5.2 4.6 5.2
12. Nitrogen as N Kg/ha 448 515.2 470.4 537.6 448 537.6 448 515.2
13. Selenm as Se mg/kg <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
14. Fluorine as F mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
15. Chromium as Cr mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
16. Molybdenum as Mo mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
17. Nickel as Ni mg/kg <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
18. Silicon as Si mg/kg 26 18 20 24 22 23 20 21
19. Calcium as Ca mg/kg 60 66 72 56 62 70 60 66
20. Phosphorus as P mg/kg 16 18 22 24 26 25 21 17
21. Magnesium as Mg mg/kg 120 128 126 124 124 132 136 136
22. Sulphur as S mg/kg 28 20 24 26 20 20 22 23
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 123
Table 3.25: Summary of Soil Quality Monitoring of One Season in Study area (Pre – Monsoon Season)
Sr.No. Parameters UNIT S 1 S 2 S 3 S 4 S5 S6 S7 S8
30 Centimeters
1.
Texture - - - - - - - - -
Sand % 14 16 14 15 15 14 18 15
Silt % 60 58 60 59 58 60 56 62
Clay % 25 24 25 26 25 25 23 20
2. pH (10% Slurry) - 6 6.2 6.2 5.9 6.1 6 5.9 6.3
3. Organic Matter % 1.11 1.1 1.13 1.21 1.09 1.2 1.18 1.16
4. S.A.R meq/kg 3.2 2.2 2.8 3 2.2 2.6 3.1 3
5. Sodium as Na mg/kg 26 24 30 28 27 24 25 22
6. Phosphorus as P Kg/ha 24 22 24 24 28 22 28 28
7. Potassium as K Kg/ha 246.4 201.6 175.2 268.8 224 313.6 246.4 318.6
8. Chloride as Cl mg/kg 40 36 30 34 36 28 30 32
9. Zinc as Zn mg/kg 0.42 0.38 0.24 0.26 0.15 0.26 0.42 0.38
10. Copper as Cu. mg/kg 0.42 0.38 0.36 0.27 0.23 0.42 0.38 0.27
11. Iron as Fe mg/kg 5.2 4.6 4.8 4.4 5.1 5.2 4.6 5.2
12. Nitrogen as N Kg/ha 547.6 470.4 448 492.8 448 470.4 515.2 470.4
13. Selenm as Se mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
14. Fluorine as F mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
15. Chromium as Cr mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
16. Molybdenum as Mo mg/kg <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
17. Nickel as Ni mg/kg <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
18. Silicon as Si mg/kg 26 24 18 22 20 24 23 21
19. Calcium as Ca mg/kg 44 40 42 36 38 34 40 42
20. Phosphorus as P Kg/ha 25 18 20 24 21 23 21 20
21. Magnesium as Mg mg/kg 126 124 120 126 124 128 120 122
22. Sulphur as S mg/kg 32 38 30 37 25 28 34 32
Sr.No. Parameters UNIT S 1 S 2 S 3 S 4 S5 S6 S7 S8
60 Centimeters
1
Texture - - - - - - - - -
Sand % 18 18 17 16 18 17 18 19
Silt % 45 47 50 48 45 46 48 50
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 124
Sr.No. Parameters UNIT S 1 S 2 S 3 S 4 S5 S6 S7 S8
Clay % 26 25 27 26 25 26 28 25
2 pH (10% Slurry) - 5.85 6.01 5.96 5.74 6.05 6.21 5.93 5.74
3 Organic Matter % 1.01 1.09 1.11 1.21 1.15 1.22 1.14 1.08
4 S.A.R meq/kg 3 2.2 2 2.5 2.1 2.1 2.4 2
5 Sodium as Na mg/kg 26 22 28 28 27 24 25 22
6 Phosphorus as P Kg/ha 28 22 24 24 28 22 29 22
7 Potassium as K Kg/ha 224 246.4 268.8 268.8 268.8 268.8 246.4 291.2
8 Chloride as Cl mg/kg 30 36 30 32 36 28 30 32
9 Zinc as Zn mg/kg 0.42 0.15 0.24 0.26 0.15 0.26 0.42 0.38
10 Copper as Cu. mg/kg 0.42 0.38 0.36 0.27 0.23 0.42 0.38 0.27
11 Iron as Fe mg/kg 5.2 4.6 4.8 4.4 5.1 5.2 4.6 5.2
12 Nitrogen as N Kg/ha 403.2 604.8 537.6 537.6 492.8 470.4 515.2 537.6
13 Selenm as Se mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
14 Fluorine as F mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
15 Chromium as Cr mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
16 Molybdenum as Mo mg/kg <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
17 Nickel as Ni mg/kg <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
18 Silicon as Si mg/kg 24 23 18 16 24 22 20 21
19 Calcium as Ca mg/kg 38 36 30 28 36 30 34 36
20 Phosphorus as P mg/kg 29 24 21 26 20 23 21 24
21 Magnesium as Mg mg/kg 126 124 124 122 124 128 120 122
22 Sulphur as S mg/kg 34 24 22 30 20 24 30 31
Sr.No. Parameters UNIT S 1 S 2 S 3 S 4 S5 S6 S7 S8
90 Centimeters
1
Texture - - - - - - - - -
Sand % 16 18 16 16 14 16 14 18
Silt % 43 42 45 50 50 44 40 45
Clay % 25 27 26 24 23 22 20 24
2 pH (10% Slurry) - 5.6 5.7 6 5.8 5.9 5.7 5.3 5.4
3 Organic Matter % 0.98 0.95 1.05 1.12 0.96 1.15 1.09 0.99
4 S.A.R meq/kg 1.8 2.1 1.8 2.2 1.87 1.9 1.92 1.85
5 Sodium as Na mg/kg 26 22 28 28 27 24 30 27
6 Phosphorus as P Kg/ha 26 22 24 24 27 22 27 22
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 125
Sr.No. Parameters UNIT S 1 S 2 S 3 S 4 S5 S6 S7 S8
7 Potassium as K Kg/ha 201.6 201.6 268.8 268.8 224 318.6 268.8 246.4
8 Chloride as Cl mg/kg 30 36 30 32 36 28 33 37
9 Zinc as Zn mg/kg 0.42 0.15 0.24 0.26 0.15 0.26 0.22 0.19
10 Copper as Cu. mg/kg 0.42 0.38 0.36 0.27 0.23 0.42 0.35 0.27
11 Iron as Fe mg/kg 5.2 4.6 4.8 4.4 5.1 5.2 4.6 4.8
12 Nitrogen as N Kg/ha 425.6 560 492.8 537.6 470.4 470.4 515.2 492.8
13 Selenm as Se mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
14 Fluorine as F mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
15 Chromium as Cr mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
16 Molybdenum as Mo mg/kg <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
17 Nickel as Ni mg/kg <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
18 Silicon as Si mg/kg 22 26 24 22 21 28 26 23
19 Calcium as Ca mg/kg 36 32 40 32 34 30 29 35
20 Phosphorus as P mg/kg 22 18 20 20 15 10 18 22
21 Magnesium as Mg mg/kg 123 121 116 120 121 122 124 126
22 Sulphur as S mg/kg 25 29 21 22 14 16 18 16
Table 3.26: Summary of Soil Quality Monitoring of One Season in Study area (Monsoon Season)
Sr.No. Parameters Unit S 1 S 2 S 3 S 4 S5 S6 S7 S8
30 centimeters
1
Texture - - - - - - - - -
Sand % 14 15 16 18 17 14 18 15
Silt % 58 53 60 57 54 57 52 54
Clay % 24 22 22 22 21 26 20 20
2 pH (10% Slurry) - 5.36 5.61 5.64 6.08 5.97 5.62 5.48 5.56
3 Organic Matter % 1.02 1.23 1.15 1.12 1.16 1.21 1.02 1.05
4 S.A.R meq/kg 3.2 2.4 2.5 2.2 2.3 2 2.4 2.1
5 Sodium as Na mg/kg 29 33 26 32 29 26 22 25
6 Phosphorus as P Kg/ha 22 26 30 24 28 36 38 24
7 Potassium as K Kg/ha 224 268.8 179.2 201.6 313.6 246.4 246.4 291.2
8 Chloride as Cl mg/kg 32 30 28 28 30 24 26 30
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 126
Sr.No. Parameters Unit S 1 S 2 S 3 S 4 S5 S6 S7 S8
9 Zinc as Zn mg/kg 0.54 0.72 0.34 0.21 0.15 0.23 0.4 0.32
10 Copper as Cu. mg/kg 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.2
11 Iron as Fe mg/kg 5.3 4.2 4.8 4.6 5.2 5 4.2 5.6
12 Nitrogen as N Kg/ha 537.6 515.2 470.4 537.6 515.2 537.6 448 565
13 Sulphur as S mg/kg 22 18 22 24 26 23 21 25
14 Selenm as Se mg/kg <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
15 Fluorine as F mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
16 Chromium as Cr mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
17 Molybdenum as Mo mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
18 Nickel as Ni mg/kg <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
19 Silicon as Si mg/kg 20 25 27 21 26 23 25 22
20 Calcium as Ca mg/kg 60 58 62 58 66 70 64 68
21 Magnesium as Mg mg/kg 130 120 125 124 128 132 140 124
Sr.No. Parameters Unit S 1 S 2 S 3 S 4 S5 S6 S7 S8
60 centimeters
1
Texture - - - - - - - - -
Sand % 15 12 16 14 17 14 16 12
Silt % 54 57 50 58 54 55 52 56
Clay % 26 26 22 18 21 24 20 20
2 pH (10% Slurry) - 5.4 5.5 5.4 5.7 5.9 5.5 5.4 5.7
3 Organic Matter % 1.11 1.06 1.01 1.02 1.04 1.04 1.02 1.01
4 S.A.R meq/kg 3.2 2.9 2 2 2.1 2 2.1 2
5 Sodium as Na mg/kg 26 22 26 32 35 22 38 25
6 Phosphorus as P Kg/ha 34 42 36 22 20 29 24 20
7 Potassium as K Kg/ha 179.2 179.2 134.4 156.8 112 179.2 246.4 291.2
8 Chloride as Cl mg/kg 36 36 30 26 25 28 30 35
9 Zinc as Zn mg/kg 0.5 0.7 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.4
10 Copper as Cu. mg/kg 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.2
11 Iron as Fe mg/kg 5.4 3.6 5.2 4.1 4.6 5.8 4.7 6.1
12 Nitrogen as N Kg/ha 313.6 291.2 448 403.2 358.4 403.2 492.8 470.4
13 Sulphur as S mg/kg 26 22 24 21 22 28 23 25
14 Selenm as Se mg/kg <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
15 Fluorine as F mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 127
Sr.No. Parameters Unit S 1 S 2 S 3 S 4 S5 S6 S7 S8
16 Chromium as Cr mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
17 Molybdenum as Mo mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
18 Nickel as Ni mg/kg <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
19 Silicon as Si mg/kg 22 26 24 28 21 20 23 24
20 Calcium as Ca mg/kg 64 66 60 60 56 72 70 68
21 Magnesium as Mg mg/kg 122 130 125 126 124 122 116 130
Sr.No. Parameters Unit S 1 S 2 S 3 S 4 S5 S6 S7 S8
90 centimeters
1
Texture - - - - - - - - -
Sand % 16 12 12 13 15 16 16 14
Silt % 50 52 54 52 54 52 50 52
Clay % 26 26 24 22 24 22 24 22
2 pH (10% Slurry) - 5.84 5.77 5.82 5.71 5.21 5.62 5.47 5.66
3 Organic Matter % 1.02 0.98 1 1.1 0.98 1.06 1.04 1.02
4 S.A.R meq/kg 2.1 1.84 1.96 2.1 1.85 1.9 1.86 2.12
5 Sodium as Na mg/kg 30 25 26 30 27 22 18 25
6 Phosphorus as P Kg/ha 24 26 24 22 24 24 28 20
7 Potassium as K Kg/ha 179.2 179.2 134.4 156.8 112 179.2 246.4 291.2
8 Chloride as Cl mg/kg 32 30 28 28 30 24 26 30
9 Zinc as Zn mg/kg 0.54 0.72 0.34 0.21 0.15 0.23 0.4 0.32
10 Copper as Cu. mg/kg 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.2
11 Iron as Fe mg/kg 5.3 4.2 4.8 4.6 5.2 5 4.2 5.6
12 Nitrogen as N Kg/ha 313.6 291.2 448 403.2 358.4 403.2 492.8 470.4
13 Sulphur as S mg/kg 23 16 25 24 19 20 22 28
14 Selenm as Se mg/kg <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
15 Fluorine as F mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
16 Chromium as Cr mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
17 Molybdenum as Mo mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
18 Nickel as Ni mg/kg <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
19 Silicon as Si mg/kg 23.4 26.2 22.1 25.2 23.4 27.1 28 22
20 Calcium as Ca mg/kg 62 68 64 56 60 74 56 66
21 Magnesium as Mg mg/kg 128 122 120 122 122 122 120 122
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 128
RESULT INTERPRETATION
The soil samples were taken from 30cm, 60cm and 90cm depth from all the locations. The Interpretation
of Soil Characteristic has been dwelled in following sub-sections for three seasons:
Soil pH: Soil pH is an important soil property, which affects the availability of several plant nutrients. It
is a measure of acidity and alkalinity and reflects the status of base saturation. It measures the -ve
logarithm of hydrogen ions activity of soil solution and defines the soil acidity and alkanity.
The soil pH ranges from 5.4 to 6.1 from 30cm, 5.4 to 5.9 from 60cm, 5.4 to 5.7 from 90cm in
Post Monsoon season thereby indicating the soils is strongly acidic or moderately acidic.
The soil pH ranges from 5.9 to 6.3 from 30cm, 5.74 to 6.21 from 60cm and 5.3 to 6 90cm in Pre-
Monsoon season thereby indicating the soils is strongly acidic or slightly acidic.
The soil pH ranges from 5.36 to 6.08 30cm, 5.4 to 5.9 60cm , 5.21 to 5.84 90cm in Monsoon
season thereby indicating the soils are slightly acidic to strongly acidic.
Soil Texture: The soil texture of the study area are sandy to silty loam and clayey loam in nature
Organic Matter: The effect of soil organic matter on soil properties is well recognized. Soil organic
matter plays a vital role in supplying plant nutrients, cation exchange capacity, improving soil
aggregation and hence water retention and soil biological activity.
The organic carbon content of soil varied from 1.03 % to 1.2 % from 30cm depth 1.01 % to 1.11
% from 60 cm depth and 0.02 % to 1.03 % from 90 cm depth in Post Monsoon season, thereby
implying that soils are sufficient in organic carbon.
The organic carbon content of soil varied from 1.09 % to 1.21 % 30cm depth (Pre-Monsoon)
from 1.01 % to 1.22 % 60cm depth (Pre-Monsoon) from 0.95 % to 1.15 % 90cm depth (Pre-
Monsoon), thereby implying that soils are sufficient in organic carbon.
The organic carbon content of soil varied from 1.02 % to 1.23 % 30cm depth , 1.01 % to 1.11 %
60cm depth , 0.98 % to 1.1 % 90cm depth in Monsoon season, thereby implying that soils are
sufficient in organic carbon.
Macronutrients: Nutrients like Nitrogen (N), Phosphorus (P) and Potassium (K) are considered as
primary nutrients and sulphur (S) as secondary nutrient. These nutrients help in proper growth,
development and yield differentiation of plants and are generally required by plants in large quantity.
Available Nitrogen: Nitrogen is an integral component of many compounds including chlorophyll and
enzyme essential for plant growth. It is an essential constituent for amino acids, which is building blocks
for plant tissue, cell nuclei and protoplasm. It encourages the aboveground vegetative growth and deep
green colour to leaves. Deficiency of Nitrogen decreasing rate and extent of protein-synthesis and result
into stunted growth and develop chlorosis.
Available nitrogen content in the surface soils ranges between 448 to 515.2 kg/ha from 30cm
depth, 448 % to 537.6 kg/ha from 60cm depth, 448 to 537.6 kg/ha from 90cm depth in Post
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 129
Monsoon season, thereby indicating that soils available are in medium range of nitrogen
content.
Available nitrogen content in the surface soils ranges between 448 to 547.6 kg/ha from 30 cm
depth, 403.2 to 604.8 kg/ha 60 cm depth and 425.6 to 560 kg/ha 90 cm depth in Pre-Monsoon
season, thereby indicating that soils available are ranging from medium to high nitrogen
content.
The surface soils range between 448 to 565 kg/ha from 30cm depth, 313.6 to 448 kg/ha from
60cm depth (Monsoon), between 219.2 to 492.8 kg/ha from 90cm depth in monsoon season,
thereby indicating that soils available are in medium range of nitrogen content.
Available Phosphorus: Phosphorus is important component of adenosine di-phosphate (ADP) and
adenosine tri-phosphate (ATP), which involves in energy transformation in plant. It is essential
component of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA), the seat of genetic inheritance in plant and animal.
Phosphorus take part in important functions like photosynthesis, nitrogen fixation, crop maturation,
root development, strengthening straw in cereal crops etc. The availability of Phosphorus is restricted
under acidic and alkaline soil reaction mainly due to P-fixation. In acidic condition, it gets fixed with
aluminium and iron and in alkaline condition with calcium.
The availability of Phosphorus is restricted under acidic and alkaline soil reaction mainly due to
P-fixation. In acidic condition, it gets fixed with aluminium and iron and in alkaline condition
with calcium. Available phosphorus content ranges between 22 to 28 kg/ha from 30cm depth,
22 to 28 kg/ha from 60cm depth and 22 to 28 kg/ha from 90 cm depth thereby indicating that
soil available are in high range of phosphorus content during Post mosoon season.
Available phosphorus content ranges between 22 to 28 kg/ha from 30 cm depth, 22 to 29
kg/ha from 60cm depth, 22 to 27 kg/ha from 90cm, thereby indicating that soil available are
high range of phosphorus content during Pre mosoon season.
Available phosphorus content ranges between 22 to 38 kg/ha from 30cm depth, 22 to 35 kg/ha
from 60cm depth (Monsoon) and 20 to 28 kg/ha from 90cm depth (Monsoon), thereby
indicating that soils thereby indicating that soil available are medium to high phosphorus
content during mosoon season.
Available Potassium: Potassium is an activator of various enzymes responsible for plant processes like
energy metabolism, starch synthesis, nitrate reduction and sugar degradation. It is extremely mobile in
plant and help to regulate opening and closing of stomata in the leaves and uptake of water by root
cells. It is important in grain formation and tuber development and encourages crop resistance for
certain fungal and bacterial diseases.
Available potassium content in the soil ranges between 175.2 to 313.6 kg/ha from 30cm depth,
180.2 to 316.8 kg/ha from 60cm depth and 134.4 to 291.2 kg/ha from 90 cm depth, thereby
indicating medium to high in potassium content in the area during Post Monsoon season
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 130
The soil ranges between 224 to 318.6 kg/ha from 30cm depth, between 224 to 291.2 kg/ha
from 60cm depth, between 201.6 to 318.6 kg/ha from 90cm depth thereby indicating medium
to high in potassium content during pre-monsoon season.
The soil ranges between 179.2 to 313.6 kg/ha from 30cm depth, between 134.4 to 291.2 kg/ha
60cm depth between 112 to 291.2 kg/ha from 90cm depth, thereby indicating indicating
medium to high in potassium content in the area during Monsoon season
Over all NPK levels in all the sampling locations are in medium to high level in terms of soil
fertility.
Sodium Absorption Ratio: The soils have excellent in SAR value in all samples in all season, in so far
as the SAR value ranges between 22 to 30 meq /kg from 30cm depth , 22 to 28 meq /kg from 60cm ,
22 to 28 meq /kg from 90cm depth in Post Monsoon Season.
SAR value ranges between 22 to 30 meq/kg from 30cm depth, 22 to 28 meq/kg from 60cm,
between 22 to 30 meq/kg from 90cm in Pre-Monsoon season.
SAR value ranges between 22 to 33 meq /kg from 30cm, 22 to 38 meq /kg in 60cm depth, 18 to
30 meq /kg from 90cm depth in Monsoon season.
Inference
Soils have good organic carbon and are capable of supporting agriculture. The soils of study area are
neither saline nor sodic as pH value of soils in all analysed samples is less than 8.5.
3.7 NOISE QUALITY
METHOD OF MONITORING
Sound Pressure Level (SPL) measurements were measured at all locations. The day noise levels have
been monitored during 6 am to 10 pm and night levels during 10 pm to 6 am at all the locations within
study area.
IDENTIFICATION OF SAMPLING LOCATIONS
A preliminary reconnaissance survey has been undertaken to identify the major noise generating
sources in the area. Noise at different generating sources has been identified based on the activities in
the study area and traffic. The noise monitoring has been conducted for determination of ambient noise
levels in the study area. The noise level at each location were recorded for 24 hrs.
NOISE MONITORING STATIONS
Table 3.27: Details of Noise Monitoring Stations Sr. No.
Locations Sampling Code
Direction Dist. (Km)
Coordinates
North East
1. Project site N1 - - 18°32'16.91"N 84°19'35.90"E
2. Near Bhavanapadu beach N2 N 1.1 18°34'2.89"N 84°20'59.10"E
3. Near Meghavaram Village N3 SW 4.75 18°30'6.01"N 84°15'54.95"E
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 131
Sr. No.
Locations Sampling Code
Direction Dist. (Km)
Coordinates
North East
4. Near Telineelapuram Village N4 ENE 7.2 18°34'24.96"N 84°15'55.76"E
5. Near Selagapeta Village N5 WSW 4.06 18°34'32.21"N 84°19'10.73"E
6. Near Routhupuram Village N6 NW 5.84 18°37'23.84"N 84°19'30.00"E
7. Near Devda Village N7 NNW 5.5 18°37'51.62"N 84°20'34.14"E
8. Near Dabbalapadu Village N8 N 5.2 18°37'45.12"N 84°21'40.02"E
9. Near URK Puram N9 NNE 5.17 18°37'29.36"N 84°22'31.89"E
10. Near Bhavnapadu Harbour
Road N10 N 4.0 18°35'37.57"N 84°21'44.28"E
Figure 3.19: Noise Monitoring Photographs
AMBIENT NOISE QUALITY MONITORING RESULTS
The Noise monitoring results for Post-Monsoon (October 2020), Pre-Monsoon (April 2021) and
Monsoon season (September 2021) have been detailed out in Table 3.28.
Table 3.28: Leq day time and night time noise levels and Leq day and night time noise levels during Post-monsoon, Pre-Monsoon and Monsoon season study period
Sr.
No
Sampling
Code
Post-Monsoon Pre-Monsoon Monsoon CPCB Limits
Leq. dB(A)
Leq
Day
dB(A)
Leq
Night
dB(A)
Leq
Day
&
Night
Leq
Day
dB(A)
Leq
Night
dB(A)
Leq
Day
&
Night
Leq
Day
dB(A)
Leq
Night
dB(A)
Leq
Day
&
Night
Day* Night*
1. N1 51.24 48.06 54.80 53.42 50.28 57.01 48.37 45.13 51.89 75 70
2. N2 47.80 44.81 51.49 48.89 45.49 52.29 44.76 41.93 48.57 55 45
3. N3 54.37 52.62 58.98 52.50 47.58 54.90 50.34 48.71 55.05 55 45
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 132
Sr.
No
Sampling
Code
Post-Monsoon Pre-Monsoon Monsoon CPCB Limits
Leq. dB(A)
Leq
Day
dB(A)
Leq
Night
dB(A)
Leq
Day
&
Night
Leq
Day
dB(A)
Leq
Night
dB(A)
Leq
Day
&
Night
Leq
Day
dB(A)
Leq
Night
dB(A)
Leq
Day
&
Night
Day* Night*
4. N4 69.12 55.50 68.21 57.31 51.94 59.45 66.17 52.57 65.26 55 45
5. N5 48.77 45.44 52.22 44.93 41.90 48.60 45.79 42.29 49.12 55 45
6. N6 53.18 50.47 57.08 45.29 42.55 49.16 49.16 46.41 53.03 55 45
7. N7 45.87 44.24 50.58 53.30 50.52 57.14 42.94 41.14 47.52 55 45
8. N8 57.39 51.69 59.33 66.13 52.64 65.25 54.39 48.64 56.30 55 45
9. N9 56.26 53.36 60.02 48.11 44.93 51.67 53.27 50.38 57.04 55 45
10. N10 53.33 48.29 55.66 51.52 48.34 55.08 52.29 47.38 54.70 55 45
3.7.4.1 Result Interpretation
The major source of the noise in the study area is the flow of community noise and vehicular
movements.
The noise monitoring shows that the average daytime noise level at some of the monitored
places are slightly above the standard limit of residential area, while average night-time noise
level is well within the standard limit.
The highest noise levels recorded during daytime at Telineelapuram (N4) is 69.12 dB (A) Leq and
during nighttime it is 44.24 dB (A) Leq at Devda Village (N7) during Post monsoon season.
The highest noise levels recorded during daytime at Dabbalapadu (N8) is 66.13 dB (A) Leq and
during nighttime it is 41.90 dB (A) Leq at Selagapeta Village (N5) during Pre- Monsoon season.
The highest noise levels recorded during daytime at Telineelapuram (N4) is 66.17 dB (A) Leq and
during nighttime it is 41.14 dB (A) Leq (Monsoon) Devda Village at (N7).
3.8 BIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT
Protecting and conserving biodiversity, maintaining ecosystem services, and sustainably managing living
natural resources are fundamental to sustainable development. Impacts on ecology & biodiversity can
often adversely affect the delivery of ecosystem services, impacting over human beings and biodiversity.
This section considers the baseline ecology & biodiversity (terrestrial & aquatic) in the project study area
and its environs. The study area covers 10 km radius with 180o angle from the proposed port area. The
study area was divided into Four (04) regions, for field survey/study purpose, namely West, North-West,
South-West and South regions. These four regions have two villages namely Pathlingadu and Mulapetha
with landuse predominated by agriculture, settlements, waterbodies and forest lands.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 133
TERRESTRIAL ECOLOGY
The Baseline study for the terrestrial ecological environment was carried out in a phased and
constructive manner. Successive phases of the assessment include (i) secondary data collection through
the review of available literatures and (ii) on site data collection for determining flora and fauna in the
study area and (iii) reconnaissance survey. The survey for ecology and biodiversity assessment was
conducted in the proposed Port location and its vicinity. Team of ecology experts visited the site during
October to December 2020 (Post-Monsoon Season).
Secondary available information was also reviewed while finalizing the list of floral and faunal species.
The survey included:
Reconnaissance Survey
Generation of primary data to understand baseline ecological status of floral and faunal diversity,
sensitive habitats and rare species
Importance and status of flora and fauna
For secondary data collection an extensive review of available published literatures (Books, Websites,
Scientific Papers, articles etc.) was conducted. The forest working plan of The Srikakulam Forest Division
(T) and data received from the concerned division on Tekkali Sub-Division was also referred for
secondary information in addition to the meeting with concerned Divisional Forest Officer, Srikakulam
(T), information was also sourced from the APMB, Government institutions, and local residents of the
survey area. The secondary data was also appropriately supplemented by a field survey for primary data
collection.
FOREST RESOURCES
The study area falls under Srikakulam district of Andhra Pradesh and having a geographical area of 5837
km2, out of which, the total forest area (excluding scrub) is about 860.83 km2. The Forest Cover is about
14.75 km2 of district and about 0.52% of the total geographical area of Andhra Pradesh i.e. 162968 km2
.The district is predominantly covered by open Forest (706.71 Km2) followed by moderately dense forest
(154.12Km2). The very dense forests are categorically not reported in the project district. The Scrubs
accounts only 389.64 Km2 in the project district. Figure 3.20 depicts the Forest Cover Map of Andhra
Pradesh highlighting the Project Site.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 134
*Source: India States of the Forest Report-Andhra Pradesh, 2021 Published by Forest Survey of India, Dehradun
Figure 3.20: Forest Cover Map of Andhra Pradesh depicting the Project Site
VEGETATION
Site Area: The vegetation in the port site ranges from costal vegetion such as Spinifex littoreus, Ipomoea
pes-caprae, Hydrophylax maritima, Launaea procumbens & Cyperus arenarius. Open scrub vegetation of
dwarg Borassus flabellifer, Pandanus fascicularis followed by Plantations such as cashew tree
(Anacardium occidentale), Casuarina equisetifolia, coconut tree (Cocos nucifera) & Acacia auriculiformis.
Scattered trees such as Morinda corea, Cordia oblique, Jatropha curcas and Sapindus emarginatus are
distubited in the open areas. Paddy is grown in the cultivated areas. Small patches of dwarf mangrove of
Avicennia marina were also noticed.
Buffer Area: Coastal vegetation is dominated by Cahew, Casuarina, Coconut plantations. Riparian
vegetation is seen along the nawpada creek. Dwarf mangroves dominated by Avicennia marina followed
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 135
Rhizophora mucronate, Bruguiera cylindrica and Ceriops decandra. Agricultural practices include paddy,
groundnut, sorghm and sunflower. Standing trees such as Azadirachta indica, Tectona grandis, Cocos
nucifera, Samanea saman, borassus flabellifer & Phoenix sylvestris are common along the field and
water body bundes. The Study area habitat photographs is shown in the below igure 3.21.
Coastal Vegetation with plantations near Meghavaram
Coastal Vegetation near Bhavanapadu
Hydrophytes near Vemulavada lake Draf Mangroves near Tekkali Creek
Trees along the field bunds near D.Neelapram Paddy cultivation near Naupada
Figure 3.21: Study Area Habitat Photographs
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 136
FLORAL DIVERSITY
The Floral diversity in terms of Over-storey vegetation (Trees) and under-storey vegetation (shrubs,
herbs, grasses & climbers) found in the study area and its environs is described in the appended section
below:
3.8.4.1 Trees
According to primary and secondary survey, a total of 140 tree species belonging to 49 families were
found in the study area. Mimosaceae and Moraceae were found to be the most dominant families
having 10 species each followed by Caesalpiniaceae with 09 families (Please Refer Figure 3.22 Out of
140 tree species found in the study area, 133 terrestrial species of trees followed by 04 Marshy Tree
Species, 02 Aquatic and 01 semi-aquatic species were found (Please Refer Figure 3.23). Table 3.29
exhibits the important tree species observed in the study area during the primary survey and supported
by the secondary literature.
Table 3.29: List of Major Tree Species found in the Study Area
S.No Species Family Habit Habitat
1. Acacia catechu (L.f.) Willd. Mimosaceae Terrestrial Wild
2. Acacia leucophloea (Roxb.) Willd. Mimosaceae Terrestrial Wild
3. Acacia nilotica (L.) Willd. ex Del. Mimosaceae Terrestrial Wild
4. Aegle marmelos (L.) Correa Rutaceae Terrestrial Wild
5. Aglaia elaeagnoidea (Juss.) Benth. Meliaceae Terrestrial Wild
6. Ailanthus excelsa Roxb. Simaroubaceae Terrestrial Wild
7. Alangium salviifolium (L.f.) Wang. Alangiaceae Terrestrial Wild
8. Albizia amara (Roxb.) Boivin Mimosaceae Terrestrial Wild
9. Albizia lebbeck (L.) Willd. Mimosaceae Terrestrial Wild
10. Alstonia scholaris (L.) R.Br. Apocynaceae Terrestrial Cultivated
11. Annona reticulata L. Annonaceae Terrestrial Planted
12. Annona squamosa L. Annonaceae Terrestrial Cultivated
13. Anthocephalus cadamba (Roxb.) Miq. Rubiaceae Terrestrial Cultivated
14. Araucaria cunninghamii Aiton ex D.Don Araucariaceae Terrestrial Ornamental
15. Ardisia solanaceaRoxb. Myrisinaceae Marshy Wild
16. Avicennia officinalis L. Avicenniaceae Marshy Wild
17. Azadirachta indica A. Juss. Meliaceae Terrestrial Wild
18. Balanites aegyptiaca (L.) Del. Balanitaceae Terrestrial Wild
19. Barringtonia racemosa (L.) Spreng. Lecythidaceae Terrestrial Wild
20. Bassia latifolia Roxb. Sapotaceae Terrestrial Wild
21. Bauhinia purpurea L. Caesalpiniaceae Terrestrial Cultivated
22. Bauhinia racemosa Lam. Caesalpiniaceae Terrestrial Wild
23. Bombax ceiba L. Bombacaceae Terrestrial Wild
24. Bridelia crenulata Roxb. Euphorbiaceae Terrestrial Wild
25. Buchanania axillaris (Desr.) Ramam. Anacardiaceae Terrestrial Wild
26. Butea monosperma (Lam.) Taub. Fabaceae Terrestrial Wild
27. Capparis decidua (Forssk.) Edgew. Capparidaceae Terrestrial Wild
28. Capparis grandis L. Capparidaceae Terrestrial Wild
29. Caryota urens L. Arecaceae Terrestrial Wild
30. Cassia fistula L. Caesalpiniaceae Terrestrial Wild
31. Cassia obtusa L. Caesalpiniaceae Terrestrial Wild
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 137
S.No Species Family Habit Habitat
32. Cassia siamea Lam. Caesalpiniaceae Terrestrial Wild
33. Casuarina equisetifolia L. Casuarinaceae Terrestrial Planted
34. Ceiba pentandra (L.) Gaertn. Bombacaceae Terrestrial Wild
35. Cereus pterogonus Lem. Cactaceae Terrestrial Wild
36. Chloroxylon swietenia DC. Rutaceae Terrestrial Wild
37. Commiphora berryi (Arn.) Engler Burseraceae Terrestrial Wild
38. Commiphora caudata (Wight & Arn.) Engler Burseraceae Terrestrial Wild
39. Cordia dichotoma G. Forst. Boraginaceae Terrestrial Wild
40. Cordia domestica Roth Boraginaceae Terrestrial Wild
41. Cordia myxa L. Boraginaceae Terrestrial Wild
42. Cordia sebestena L. Boraginaceae Terrestrial Ornamental
43. Couroupita guianensis Aubl. Lecythidaceae Terrestrial Ornamental
44. Cycas circinalis L. Cycadaceae Terrestrial Ornamental
45. Dalbergia sissoo Roxb. Fabaceae Terrestrial Planted
46. Delonix elata (L.) Gamble Caesalpiniaceae Terrestrial Wild
47. Delonix regia (Boj. ex Hook) Rafin. Caesalpiniaceae Terrestrial Wild
48. Dillenia indica L. Dilleniaceae Terrestrial Planted
49. Diospyros buxifolia (Blume) Hiern Ebenaceae Terrestrial Wild
50. Diospyros chloroxylon Roxb. Ebenaceae Terrestrial Wild
51. Diospyros malabarica (Desr.) Kostel. Ebenaceae Terrestrial Wild
52. Diospyros melanoxylon Roxb. Ebenaceae Terrestrial Wild
53. Erythrina stricta Roxb. Fabaceae Terrestrial Planted
54. Erythroxylum monogynum Roxb. Erythroxylaceae Terrestrial Wild
55. Euphorbia tirucalli L. Euphorbiaceae Terrestrial Wild
56. Euphorbia trigona Mill. Euphorbiaceae Terrestrial Wild
57. Exocoecaria agallocha Linn. Euphorbiaceae Aquatic Wild
58. Ficus amplissima J.E. Smith Moraceae Terrestrial Wild
59. Ficus benghalensis L. Moraceae Terrestrial Wild
60. Ficus hispida L.f. Moraceae Terrestrial Wild
61. Ficus microcarpa var. microcarpa L.f. Moraceae Terrestrial Wild
62. Ficus microcarpa var. retusa L.f. Moraceae Terrestrial Wild
63. Ficus racemosa L. Moraceae Terrestrial Wild
64. Ficus religiosa L. Moraceae Terrestrial Wild
65. Ficus tinctoria Forst.f. Moraceae Terrestrial Wild
66. Ficus virens Ait. Moraceae Terrestrial Wild
67. Filicium decipiens (Wight & Arn.) Thw. Sapindaceae Terrestrial Wild
68. Flacourtia indica (Burm.f.) Merr. Flacourtiaceae Terrestrial Wild
69. Flacourtia ramontchi L'Herit. Flacourtiaceae Terrestrial Wild
70. Gardenia latifolia Ait. Rubiaceae Terrestrial Wild
71. Gliricidia sepium (Jacq.) Kunth ex Walp. Fabaceae Terrestrial Exotic
72. Gmelina arborea Roxb. Verbenaceae Terrestrial Wild
73. Grewia tiliifolia Vahl. Tiliaceae Terrestrial Wild
74. Guazuma ulmifolia Lam. Sterculiaceae Terrestrial Planted
75. Hibiscus rosa-sinensis Linn. Malvaceae Terrestrial Planted
76. Hibiscus tiliaceus L. Malvaceae Terrestrial Wild
77. Holoptelea integrifolia (Roxb.) Planch. Ulmaceae Terrestrial Wild
78. Ixora arborea Roxb. ex Sm. Rubiaceae Terrestrial Wild
79. Jacaranda mimosifolia D.Don. Bignoniaceae Terrestrial Ornamental
80. Kigelia pinnata (Jacq.) DC. Bignoniaceae Terrestrial Planted
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 138
S.No Species Family Habit Habitat
81. Kleinhovia hospita L. Sterculiaceae Terrestrial Planted
82. Lagerstroemia reginae Roxb. Lythraceae Terrestrial Ornamental
83. Lepisanthes tetraphylla (Vahl.) Radlk. Sapindaceae Terrestrial Wild
84. Leucaena leucocephala (L.) Gills Mimosaceae Terrestrial Exotic
85. Limonia acidissima L. Rutaceae Terrestrial Planted
86. Madhuca longifolia (J.Konig) J.F.Macbr. Sapotaceae Terrestrial Wild
87. Mangifera indica L. Anacardiaceae Terrestrial Planted
88. Manilkara hexandra (Roxb.) Dubard Sapotaceae Terrestrial Wild
89. Markhamia stipulata Seem. Bignoniaceae Terrestrial Ornamental
90. Melia azedarach L. Meliaceae Terrestrial Ornamental
91. Memecylon edule Roxb. Melastomataceae Terrestrial Wild
92. Memecylon umbellatum Burm.f. Melastomataceae Terrestrial Wild
93. Millingtonia hortensis L.f. Bignoniaceae Terrestrial Ornamental
94. Mimusops elengi L. Sapotaceae Terrestrial Ornamental
95. Mitragyna parvifolia (Roxb.) Korth. Rubiaceae Terrestrial Wild
96. Morinda pubescens J.E. Smith. Rubiaceae Terrestrial Wild
97. Moringa oleifera Lam. Moringaceae Terrestrial Cultivated
98. Murraya koenigii (L.) Spreng. Rutaceae Terrestrial Planted
99. Musa parasidiaca L. Musaceae Terrestrial Planted
100. Naringi crenulata (Roxb.) Nicolson Rutaceae Terrestrial Wild
101. Nyctanthes arbor-tristis L. Oleaceae Terrestrial Ornamental
102. Pandanus odoratissimus L.f. Pandanaceae Aquatic Wild
103. Parkia biglandulosa Wight Arn. Mimosaceae Terrestrial Ornamental
104. Parkinsonia aculeata L. Fabaceae Semi-aquatic Wild
105. Peltophorum pterocarpum (DC.) Caesalpiniaceae Terrestrial Planted
106. Phoenix sylvestris (L.) Roxb. Arecaceae Terrestrial Planted
107. Phyllanthus emblica L. Euphorbiaceae Terrestrial Planted
108. Pisonia aculeata L. Nyctaginaceae Terrestrial Ornamental
109. Pithecellobium dulce (Roxb.) Benth. Mimosaceae Terrestrial Planted
110. Plumeria acuminata Ait. Apocynaceae Terrestrial Ornamental
111. Plumeria alba L. Apocynaceae Terrestrial Ornamental
112. Plumeria rubra L. Apocynaceae Terrestrial Ornamental
113. Polyalthia cerasoides (Roxb.) Bedd. Annonaceae Terrestrial Wild
114. Polyalthia longifolia (Sonner.) Thw. Annonaceae Terrestrial Ornamental
115. Polyalthia suberosa (Roxb.) Thw. Annonaceae Terrestrial Wild
116. Pongamia pinnata (L.) Pierre Fabaceae Terrestrial Wild
117. Premna tomentosa L. Verbenaceae Terrestrial Wild
118. Prosopis cineraria (L.) Druce Mimosaceae Terrestrial Wild
119. Prosopis juliflora (Sw.) Dc. Mimosaceae Terrestrial Exotic
120. Pterocarpus marsupium Roxb. Fabaceae Terrestrial Wild
121. Pterocarpus santalinus L. Fabaceae Terrestrial Wild
122. Pterospermum acerifolium (L.) Willd. Sterculiaceae Terrestrial Wild
123. Pterospermum xylocarpum (Gaertn) S & W. Sterculiaceae Terrestrial Wild
124. Punica granatum L. Punicaceae Terrestrial Planted
125. Rhizophora apiculata Blume Rhizophoraceae Marshy Wild
126. Ricinus communis L. Euphorbiaceae Terrestrial Cultivated
127. Sapindus emarginatus Vahl. Sapindaceae Terrestrial Wild
128. Sonneratia apetala Buch. - Ham. Sonneratiaceae Marshy Wild
129. Spondias pinnata Kurz. Anacardiaceae Terrestrial Planted
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 139
S.No Species Family Habit Habitat
130. Sterculia foetida Linn. Sterculiaceae Terrestrial Ornamental
131. Streblus asper Lour. Moraceae Terrestrial Wild
132. Suregada lanceolata (Willd.) Kuntze Euphorbiaceae Terrestrial Wild
133. Swietenia macrophylla King Meliaceae Terrestrial Planted
134. Swietenia mahagoni (L.) Jacq. Meliaceae Terrestrial Planted
135. Syzygium cumini (L.) Skeels Myrtaceae Terrestrial Planted
136. Tabebuia arjentea Britton Bignoniaceae Terrestrial Planted
137. Tabebuia rosea (Bertol.) DC. Bignoniaceae Terrestrial Planted
138. Tamarindus indica L. Caesalpiniaceae Terrestrial Planted
139. Tectona grandis L.f. Verbenaceae Terrestrial Wild
140. Terminalia arjuna (Roxb.) Wight & Arn. Myrtaceae Terrestrial Planted *Source: Primary data collected by VSPL and supported through Secondary Literature
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 140
Figure 3.22: Family-wise distribution of the Tree Species found in the Study Area
Figure 3.23: Habit-wise distribution of Tree Species found in the Study Area
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 141
3.8.4.2 Shrub
The primary and secondary survey reveals the presence of 69 shrub species in the study area and its
environs. Euphorbiaceae is the predominant family representing 11 shrub species in the study area
followed by Malvaceae and Rubiaceae which covers 06 shrub species each. Table 3.30 exhibits the
important shrub species observed in the study area during the primary survey and supported by the
secondary literature.
Table 3.30: List of Major Shrub Species found in the Study Area
Sl. No. Species Family Habitat Type
1 Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench Malvaceae Terrestrial Cultivated
2 Abutilon hirtum (Lam.) Sweet Malvaceae Terrestrial Wild
3 Abutilon indicum (L.) Sweet Malvaceae Terrestrial Wild
4 Acalypha fruticosa Forssk. Euphorbiaceae Terrestrial Wild
5 Anisochilus carnosus (L.f.) wall. Lamiaceae Terrestrial Wild
6 Anisochilus scaber Benth. Lamiaceae Terrestrial Wild
7 Arundo donax L. Poaceae Marshy Wild
8 Asystasia dalzelliana Sant. Acanthaceae Terrestrial Wild
9 Asystasia gangetica (L.) T. And. Acanthaceae Terrestrial Wild
10 Azima tetracantha Lam. Salvadoraceae Terrestrial Wild
11 Benkara malabarica (Lam.) Tirvengadum Rubiaceae Terrestrial Wild
12 Breynia retusa (Dennst.) Alston Euphorbiaceae Terrestrial Wild
13 Breynia vitis-idaea (Burm.f.) Fischer Euphorbiaceae Terrestrial Wild
14 Calotropis gigantea (L.) R.Br. Apocynaceae Terrestrial Wild
15 Calotropis procera (Ait.) R.Br. Apocynaceae Terrestrial Wild
16 Carmona retusa (Vahl) Masam. Boraginaceae Terrestrial Wild
17 Chromolaena odorata (L.) King & Robinson Asteraceae Terrestrial Exotic
18 Cipadessa baccifera (Roth) Miq. Meliaceae Terrestrial Wild
19 Clerodendrum infortunatum L. Verbenaceae Terrestrial Wild
20 Clerodendrum phlomidis L.f. Verbenaceae Terrestrial Wild
21 Crotalaria juncea L. Fabaceae Terrestrial Wild
22 Datura innoxia Mill. Solanaceae Terrestrial Wild
23 Datura metal L. Solanaceae Terrestrial Wild
24 Dichrostachys cinerea (L.) Wight & Arn. Mimosaceae Terrestrial Wild
25 Dodonaea viscosa (L.) Jacq. Sapindaceae Terrestrial Wild
26 Euphorbia nivulia L. Euphorbiaceae Terrestrial Wild
27 Flueggea leucopyrus Willd. Euphorbiaceae Terrestrial Wild
28 Flueggea virosa (Willd.) Baill. Euphorbiaceae Terrestrial Wild
29 Glycosmis mauritiana (Lam.) Tanaka Rutaceae Terrestrial Wild
30 Glycosmis pentaphylla (Retz.) DC. Rutaceae Terrestrial Wild
31 Gmelina asiatica L. Verbenaceae Terrestrial Wild
32 Grewia hirsuta Vahl. Tiliaceae Terrestrial Wild
33 Grewia villosa Willd. Tiliaceae Terrestrial Wild
34 Helicteres isora L. Sterculiaceae Terrestrial Wild
35 Hibiscus cannabinus L. Malvaceae Terrestrial Planted
36 Hibiscus subdariffa L. Malvaceae Terrestrial Planted
37 Hibiscus vitifolius L. Malvaceae Terrestrial Wild
38 Indigofera trita L.f. Fabaceae Terrestrial Wild
39 Ipomoea carnea Jacq. Convolvulaceae Aquatic Wild
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 142
Sl. No. Species Family Habitat Type
40 Jatropha curcas L. Euphorbiaceae Terrestrial Planted
41 Jatropha gossypifolia L. Euphorbiaceae Terrestrial Wild
42 Jatropha tanjorensis Ellis & Saroja Euphorbiaceae Terrestrial Wild
43 Justicia adhatoda L. Acanthaceae Terrestrial Ornamental
44 Justicia betonica Linn. Acanthaceae Terrestrial Wild
45 Justicia gendarussa Burm.f. Acanthaceae Terrestrial Cultivated
46 Kleinia grandiflora (Wall. ex DC.) Rani Asteraceae Terrestrial Wild
47 Lantana camara L. Verbenaceae Terrestrial Exotic
48 Lawsonia inermis L. Lythraceae Terrestrial Planted
49 Mimosa hamata Willd. Mimosaceae Terrestrial Wild
50 Mucuna pruriens (L.) DC. Fabaceae Terrestrial Wild
51 Murraya paniculata (L.) Jack Rutaceae Terrestrial Ornamental
52 Opuntia stricta (Haw.) Haw. Cactaceae Terrestrial Wild
53 Pavetta indica L. Rubiaceae Terrestrial Wild
54 Pavetta tomentosa Roxb. ex J.E. Smith Rubiaceae Terrestrial Wild
55 Phoenix loureirii Kunth. Arecaceae Terrestrial Wild
56 Phyllanthus polyphyllus L. Euphorbiaceae Terrestrial Wild
57 Phyllanthus reticulatus Poir. Euphorbiaceae Terrestrial Wild
58 Polygonum barbatum ( L. ) H.Hara var. barbatum Polygonaceae Aquatic Wild
59 Polygonum glabrum Willdenow Polygonaceae Aquatic Wild
60 Polygonum hydropiper L. Polygonaceae Aquatic Wild
61 Randia brandisii Gamble Rubiaceae Terrestrial Wild
62 Randia dumetorum (Retz.) Poiret. Rubiaceae Terrestrial Wild
63 Randia parviflora (Thunb.) Lam. Rubiaceae Terrestrial Wild
64 Saccharum spontaneum Linn. Poaceae Aquatic Wild
65 Salicornia brachiata Miq. Chenopodiaceae Semi-aquatic Wild
66 Senna alata (L.) Roxb. Caesalpiniaceae Terrestrial Ornamental
67 Senna auriculata (L.) Roxb. Caesalpiniaceae Terrestrial Wild
68 Sesamum indicum L. Pedaliaceae Terrestrial Cultivated
69 Typha angustifolia L. Typhaceae Aquatic Wild *Source: Primary data collected by VSPL and supported through Secondary Literature
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 143
Figure 3.24: Family-wise distribution of the Shrub Species found in the Study Area
3.8.4.3 Herbaceous Payment
During the primary survey a total of 343 species of herbaceous flora belonging to 60 families were
recorded which comprised of 241 herbs followed by 71 grasses and 31 species of climbers. Family
Poaceae with 71 herbaceous species is the largest family found in the study area followed by Asteraceae
with 28 species, Cyperaceae 21 species and Fabaceae with 19 species respectively. Table 3.31 exhibits
the important herbaceous flora (Herbs, grasses and climbers) observed in the study area during the
primary survey and supported by the secondary literature.
Table 3.31: List of Major Herbaceous Flora found in the Study Area
Sl. No. Species Family Habitat Type
Herbs
1. Acalypha brachystachya Hornem. Euphorbiaceae Terrestrial Wild
2. Acalypha indica L. Euphorbiaceae Terrestrial Wild
3. Acalypha paniculata Willd. Euphorbiaceae Terrestrial Wild
4. Acanthospermum hispidum DC. Asteraceae Terrestrial Wild
5. Acanthus ilicifolius Linn. Acanthaceae Semi-aquatic Wild
6. Achyranthes aspera L. Amaranthaceae Terrestrial Wild
7. Aerides ringens (Lindl.) C.E.C.Fischer Orchidaceae Epiphytic Wild
8. Aerva lanata (L.) Juss. ex Schultes Amaranthaceae Terrestrial wild
9. Aerva persica (Burm.f.) Merr. Amaranthaceae Terrestrial wild
10. Aerva sanguinolenta (L.) Blume Amaranthaceae Terrestrial Wild
11. Aeschynomene aspera L. Fabaceae Terrestrial Wild
12. Aloe vera (L.) Burm.f. Aloeaceae Terrestrial Wild
13. Alternanthera paronychioides A. St.-Hilaire Amaranthaceae Terrestrial Wild
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 144
Sl. No. Species Family Habitat Type
14. Alternanthera pungens Kunth Amaranthaceae Terrestrial Wild
15. Alternanthera sessilis (L.) R.Br. ex DC. Amaranthaceae Aquatic Wild
16. Alternanthera tenella Colla. Amaranthaceae Semi-aquatic Wild
17. Alysicarpus longifolius Wight & Arn. Fabaceae Terrestrial Wild
18. Alysicarpus monilifer (L.) DC. Fabaceae Terrestrial Wild
19. Alysicarpus rugosus DC. Fabaceae Terrestrial Wild
20. Amaranthus spinosus L. Amaranthaceae Terrestrial Wild
21. Amaranthus viridis L. Amaranthaceae Terrestrial Wild
22. Ammannia baccifera Linn. Lythraceae Semi-aquatic Wild
23. Andrographis alata (Vahl) Nees Acanthaceae Terrestrial Wild
24. Anisomeles indica (L.) Kuntze Lamiaceae Terrestrial Wild
25. Anisomeles malabarica (L.) R. Br. ex Sims. Lamiaceae Terrestrial Wild
26. Aponogeton natans (L.) Engl. & K.Krause Aponogetonaceae Aquatic Wild
27. Argemone mexicana L. Papaveraceae Terrestrial Exotic
28. Asclepias curassavica L. Asclepiadaceae Marshy Wild
29. Atylosia scarabaeoides (L.) Benth. Fabaceae Terrestrial Wild
30. Bacopa monnieri (L.) Pennell Scrophulariaceae Aquatic Wild
31. Barleria buxifolia L. Acanthaceae Terrestrial Wild
32. Barleria cristata L. Acanthaceae Terrestrial Planted
33. Barleria mysorensis Roth. Acanthaceae Terrestrial Wild
34. Barleria prionitis L. Acanthaceae Terrestrial Wild
35. Bergia ammannioides Roxb. Elatinaceae Aquatic Wild
36. Bidens pilosa L. Asteraceae Terrestrial Wild
37. Biophytum reinwardtii (Zucc.) Klotzsch. Oxalidaceae Terrestrial Wild
38. Blainvillea acmella (L.) Philipson Asteraceae Terrestrial Wild
39. Blepharis maderaspatensis (L.) Heyne ex Roth Acanthaceae Terrestrial Wild
40. Blepharis repens (Vahl) Roth Acanthaceae Terrestrial Wild
41. Blumea lacera (Burm.f) DC. Asteraceae Terrestrial Wild
42. Blumea mollis (D.Don) Merr. Asteraceae Terrestrial Wild
43. Boerhavia diffusa L. Nyctaginaceae Terrestrial Wild
44. Boerhavia erecta L. Nyctaginaceae Terrestrial Wild
45. Bulbostylis barbata (Rottb.) C.B. Clarke Cyperaceae Terrestrial Wild
46. Caralluma adscendens Wight Asclepiadaceae Terrestrial Wild
47. Celosia argentea L. Amaranthaceae Terrestrial Wild
48. Celosia polygonoides Retz. Amaranthaceae Terrestrial Wild
49. Centella asiatica (L.) Urban Apiaceae Semi-aquatic Wild
50. Cleome aspera Koen ex. DC. Capparidaceae Terrestrial Wild
51. Cleome monophylla L. Capparidaceae Terrestrial Wild
52. Cleome viscosa L. Capparidaceae Terrestrial Wild
53. Coldenia procumbens Linn. Boraginaceae Terrestrial Wild
54. Colocasia esculenta (L.) Schott Araceae Aquatic Wild
55. Commelina benghalensis L. Commelinaceae Terrestrial Wild
56. Commelina clavata Clarke Commelinaceae Terrestrial Wild
57. Commelina longifolia Lam. Commelinaceae Terrestrial Wild
58. Conyza leucantha (D.Don) Ludlow & Raven Asteraceae Terrestrial Wild
59. Corchorus aestuans L. Tiliaceae Terrestrial Wild
60. Corchorus tridens L. Tiliaceae Terrestrial Wild
61. Corchorus trilocularis L. Tiliaceae Terrestrial Wild
62. Crotalaria evolvuloides Wight ex Wight & Arn. Fabaceae Terrestrial Wild
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 145
Sl. No. Species Family Habitat Type
63. Crotalaria mysorensis Roth. Fabaceae Terrestrial Wild
64. Croton bonplandianum Baill. Euphorbiaceae Terrestrial Wild
65. Curculigo orchioides Gaertn Hypoxidaceae Terrestrial Wild
66. Cyanotis tuberosa (Roxb.) Schultes & Schultes Commelinaceae Terrestrial Wild
67. Cyperus articulatus L. Cyperaceae Aquatic Wild
68. Cyperus difformis L. Cyperaceae Semi-aquatic Wild
69. Cyperus exaltatus Retz. Cyperaceae Aquatic Wild
70. Cyperus halpan L. Cyperaceae Semi-aquatic Wild
71. Cyperus iria L. Cyperaceae Semi-aquatic Wild
72. Cyperus pangorei Rottb. Cyperaceae Semi-aquatic Wild
73. Cyperus rotundus L. Cyperaceae Terrestrial Wild
74. Dicoma tomentosa Cass. Asteraceae Terrestrial Wild
75. Digera muricata (L.) Mart. Amaranthaceae Terrestrial Wild
76. Echinops echinatus Roxb. Asteraceae Terrestrial Wild
77. Eclipta prostrata (L.) L. Asteraceae Semi-aquatic Wild
78. Eichhornia crassipes (Mart.) Solms-Laub. Pontederiaceae Aquatic Wild
79. Elytraria acaulis (L.f.) Lindau. Acanthaceae Terrestrial Wild
80. Emilia sonchifolia (L.) DC. Asteraceae Terrestrial Wild
81. Enicostema axillare (Lam.) Raynal Gentianaceae Terrestrial Wild
82. Euphorbia geniculata Ortega Euphorbiaceae Terrestrial Wild
83. Euphorbia hirta L. Euphorbiaceae Terrestrial Wild
84. Euphorbia rosea Retz. Euphorbiaceae Terrestrial Wild
85. Euphorbia thymifolia L. Euphorbiaceae Terrestrial Wild
86. Evolvulus alsinoides (L.) L. Convolvulaceae Terrestrial Wild
87. Evolvulus nummularius (L.) L. Convolvulaceae Terrestrial Wild
88. Fimbristylis aestivalis (Retz.) Vahl. Cyperaceae Terrestrial Wild
89. Fimbristylis argentea (Rottb.) Vahl. Cyperaceae Aquatic Wild
90. Fimbristylis bisumbellata (Forssk.) Bubani Cyperaceae Semi-aquatic Wild
91. Fimbristylis complanata (Retz.) Link. Cyperaceae Semi-aquatic Wild
92. Fimbristylis dichotoma (L.) Vahl. Cyperaceae Semi-aquatic Wild
93. Fimbristylis falcata (Vahl.) Kunth. Cyperaceae Terrestrial Wild
94. Fimbristylis miliacea (L.) Vahl. Cyperaceae Semi-aquatic Wild
95. Fimbristylis ovata (Burm. F.) Kern. Cyperaceae Terrestrial Wild
96. Fimbristylis tetragona R.Br. Cyperaceae Semi-aquatic Wild
97. Giseckia pharnaceoides L. Aizoaceae Terrestrial Wild
98. Glinus lotoides Linnaeus Aizoaceae Terrestrial Wild
99. Gloriosa superba L. Colchicaceae Terrestrial Wild
100. Gnaphalium luteo-album L. Asteraceae Terrestrial Wild
101. Gnaphalium polycaulon Pers. Asteraceae Terrestrial Wild
102. Gomphrena serrata L. Amaranthaceae Terrestrial Wild
103. Grangea maderaspatana (L.) Poir. Asteraceae Terrestrial Wild
104. Hedyotis biflora (L.) Lam. Rubiaceae Terrestrial Wild
105. Hedyotis corymbosa (L.) Lam. Rubiaceae Terrestrial Wild
106. Heliotropium curasavicum L. Boraginaceae Terrestrial Wild
107. Heliotropium indicum L. Boraginaceae Terrestrial Wild
108. Hibiscus micranthus L.f. Malvaceae Terrestrial Wild
109. Hybanthus enneaspermus (L.) F. Muell. Violaceae Terrestrial Wild
110. Hydrilla verticillata (L. f.) Royle Hydrocharitaceae Aquatic Wild
111. Hygrophila auriculata (Schum) Heine Acanthaceae Marshy Wild
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 146
Sl. No. Species Family Habitat Type
112. Hyptis suaveolens (L.) Poit. Lamiaceae Terrestrial Wild
113. Indigofera caerulea Roxb. Fabaceae Terrestrial Wild
114. Indigofera linifolia (L.f.) Retz. Fabaceae Terrestrial Wild
115. Indigofera linnaei Ali Fabaceae Terrestrial Wild
116. Indigofera sp. Fabaceae Terrestrial Wild
117. Indigofera trifoliata L. Fabaceae Terrestrial Wild
118. Indoneesiella echioides (L) Nees. Acanthaceae Terrestrial Wild
119. Justicia sp. Acanthaceae Terrestrial Wild
120. Kyllingia nemoralis (J. R. & G. Forst.) Dandy ex Cyperaceae Marshy Wild
121. Lagascea mollis Cav. Asteraceae Terrestrial Wild
122. Lemna minor L. Lemnaceae Aquatic Wild
123. Leonotis nepetiifolia (L.) R. Br. Lamiaceae Terrestrial Wild
124. Lindernia antipoda (L.) Alston Scrophulariaceae Aquatic Wild
125. Lindernia crustacea (L.) F.v.Muell. Scrophulariaceae Aquatic Wild
126. Lindernia hyssopioides (L.) Haines Scrophulariaceae Aquatic Wild
127. Lindernia parviflora (Roxb.) Haines Scrophulariaceae Aquatic Wild
128. Ludwigia adscendens (L.) H. Hara Onagraceae Aquatic Wild
129. Ludwigia perennis L. Onagraceae Aquatic Wild
130. Ludwigia peruviana (L.) Hara Onagraceae Semi-aquatic Wild
131. Malvastrum coromandelianum (L.) Garcke Malvaceae Terrestrial Wild
132. Martynia annua L. Asteraceae Terrestrial Wild
133. Merremia hastata (Hallier f.) Ooststr. Convolvulaceae Terrestrial Wild
134. Merremia tridentata (L.) Hall.f. Convolvulaceae Terrestrial Wild
135. Mollugo cerviana (L.) Ser. Aizoaceae Terrestrial Wild
136. Mollugo disticha Ser. Aizoaceae Terrestrial Wild
137. Mollugo nudicaulis Lam. Aizoaceae Terrestrial Wild
138. Mollugo pentaphylla L. Aizoaceae Terrestrial Wild
139. Monochoria hastata (L.) Solms-Laub. Pontederiaceae Aquatic Wild
140. Monochoria vaginalis (Burm. F.) Presl Pontederiaceae Aquatic Wild
141. Najas indica (Willd.) Cham. Najadaceae Aquatic Wild
142. Najas marina L. Najadaceae Aquatic Wild
143. Najas minor All. Najadaceae Aquatic Wild
144. Nelumbo nucifera Gaertn. Nymphaeaceae Aquatic Wild
145. Nothosaerva brachiata (L.) Wight Amaranthaceae Terrestrial Wild
146. Nymphaea nouchali Burm. f. Nymphaeaceae Aquatic Wild
147. Nymphaea pubescens Willd. Nymphaeaceae Aquatic Wild
148. Nymphaea rubra Roxb. ex Salisb. Nymphaeaceae Aquatic Wild
149. Nymphoides indicum (L.) Kuntze Menyanthaceae Aquatic Wild
150. Ocimum canum Sims. Lamiaceae Terrestrial Wild
151. Oldenlandia umbellata L. Rubiaceae Terrestrial Wild
152. Ottelia alismoides (L.) Pers. Hydrocharitaceae Aquatic Wild
153. Oxalis corniculata L. Oxalidaceae Terrestrial Wild
154. Parthenium hysterophorus L. Asteraceae Terrestrial Exotic
155. Pavonia odorata Willd. Malvaceae Terrestrial Wild
156. Pavonia zeylanica (L.) Cav. Malvaceae Terrestrial Wild
157. Pedalium murex L. Pedaliaceae Terrestrial Wild
158. Peristrophe bicalyculata (Forssk.) Brummitt. Acanthaceae Terrestrial Wild
159. Phyla nodiflora (L.) E. Greene Verbenaceae Aquatic Wild
160. Phyllanthus amarus Schum. & Thonn. Euphorbiaceae Terrestrial Wild
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 147
Sl. No. Species Family Habitat Type
161. Phyllanthus maderaspatensis L. Euphorbiaceae Terrestrial Wild
162. Phyllanthus rotundifolius Klein ex Willd. Euphorbiaceae Terrestrial Wild
163. Phyllanthus urinaria L. Euphorbiaceae Terrestrial Wild
164. Physalis minima Linn. Solanaceae Terrestrial Wild
165. Pistia stratiotes L. Araceae Aquatic Wild
166. Polycarpaea corymbosa (L.) Lam. Caryophyllaceae Terrestrial Wild
167. Polygonum plebeium R. Br. Polygonaceae Marshy Wild
168. Portulaca oleracea L. Portulacaceae Terrestrial Wild
169. Portulaca quadrifida L. Portulacaceae Terrestrial Wild
170. Potamogeton nodosus Poir. Potamogetonaceae Aquatic Wild
171. Pseudarthria viscida (L) Wight & Arn. Fabaceae Terrestrial Wild
172. Psilotrichum elliotii Baker & Clarke Amaranthaceae Terrestrial Wild
173. Pulicaria wightiana C.B. Clarke Asteraceae Terrestrial Wild
174. Pupalia lappacea (L.) Juss. Amaranthaceae Terrestrial Wild
175. Pycreus globosus (All.) Reichenb. Cyperaceae Marshy Wild
176. Rauwolfia serpentina (L.) Benth. ex Kurz. Apocynaceae Terrestrial Wild
177. Rhynchosia capitata DC. Fabaceae Terrestrial Wild
178. Rhynchosia densiflora (Roth) DC. Fabaceae Terrestrial Wild
179. Rhynchosia minima (L.) DC. Fabaceae Terrestrial Wild
180. Ruellia patula Jacq. Acanthaceae Terrestrial Wild
181. Ruellia tuberosa L. Acanthaceae Terrestrial Wild
182. Salvinia molesta D.Mitch. Salviniaceae Aquatic Wild
183. Sansevieria roxburghiana Schultes & Schultes Dracaenaceae Terrestrial Wild
184. Scirpus articulatus Linn. Cyperaceae Aquatic Wild
185. Scleria lithosperma (L.) Sw. Cyperaceae Marshy Wild
186. Scoparia dulcis L. Scrophulariaceae Semi-aquatic Wild
187. Sebastiania chamaelea (L.) Muell.-Arg. Euphorbiaceae Terrestrial Wild
188. Senna hirsuta (L.) Irwin & Barneby Caesalpiniaceae Terrestrial Wild
189. Senna italica Mill. Caesalpiniaceae Terrestrial Wild
190. Senna occidentalis (L.) Link Caesalpiniaceae Terrestrial Wild
191. Senna tora (L.) Roxb. Caesalpiniaceae Terrestrial Wild
192. Sesuvium portulacastrum (L.) L. Aizoaceae Terrestrial Wild
193. Sida acuta Burm.f. Malvaceae Terrestrial Wild
194. Sida cordata (Burm. f.) Borss. Malvaceae Terrestrial Wild
195. Sida cordifolia L. Malvaceae Terrestrial Wild
196. Sida rhombifolia L. var. retusa (L.) Borss. Malvaceae Terrestrial Wild
197. Sida rhombifolia L. var. rhombifolia Malvaceae Terrestrial Wild
198. Sida spinosa Linn. Malvaceae Terrestrial Wild
199. Solanum surattense Burm. f. Solanaceae Terrestrial Wild
200. Sonchus oleraceus L. Asteraceae Terrestrial Wild
201. Spermacoce hispida L. Rubiaceae Terrestrial Wild
202. Spermacoce ocymoides Burm.f. Rubiaceae Terrestrial Wild
203. Sphaeranthus indicus Linn. Asteraceae Terrestrial Wild
204. Spilanthes calva DC. Asteraceae Marshy Wild
205. Spilanthes uliginosa Sw. Asteraceae Marshy Wild
206. Stemodia viscosa Roxb. Scrophulariaceae Marshy Wild
207. Striga asiatica (L.) Kuntze Scrophulariaceae Terrestrial Wild
208. Suaeda fruticosa Forssk. ex J.F. Gmelin Chenopodiaceae Semi-aquatic Wild
209. Suaeda nudiflora (Willd) Moq. Chenopodiaceae Semi-aquatic Wild
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 148
Sl. No. Species Family Habitat Type
210. Synedrella nodiflora (L.) Gaertn. Asteraceae Terrestrial Wild
211. Taraxacum officinale F.H.Wigg Asteraceae Terrestrial Wild
212. Tephrosia purpurea (L.) Pers. Fabaceae Terrestrial Wild
213. Tephrosia villosa (L.) Pers. Fabaceae Terrestrial Wild
214. Trianthema triquetra Rottl. Aizoaceae Terrestrial Wild
215. Tribulus lanuginosis L. Zygophyllaceae Terrestrial Wild
216. Tribulus terrestris L. Zygophyllaceae Terrestrial Wild
217. Trichodesma indicum (L.) R. Br. Boraginaceae Terrestrial Wild
218. Tridax procumbens L. Asteraceae Terrestrial Wild
219. Triumfetta pentandra A. Rich Tiliaceae Terrestrial Wild
220. Triumfetta rhomboidea Jacq. Tiliaceae Terrestrial Wild
221. Triumfetta rotundifolia Lam. Tiliaceae Terrestrial Wild
222. Turnera subulata Smith Turneraceae Terrestrial Exotic
223. Urena lobata L. subsp. lobata Malvaceae Terrestrial Wild
224. Urena lobata L. subsp. sinuata (L.) Borss. Malvaceae Terrestrial Wild
225. Vallisneria spiralis L. Hydrocharitaceae Aquatic Wild
226. Vanda tessellata (Roxb.) G.Don. Orchidaceae Epiphytic Wild
227. Vernonia cinerea (L.) Less. Asteraceae Terrestrial Wild
228. Trianthema triquetra Rottl. Aizoaceae Terrestrial Wild
229. Tribulus lanuginosis L. Zygophyllaceae Terrestrial Wild
230. Tribulus terrestris L. Zygophyllaceae Terrestrial Wild
231. Trichodesma indicum (L.) R. Br. Boraginaceae Terrestrial Wild
232. Tridax procumbens L. Asteraceae Terrestrial Wild
233. Triumfetta pentandra A. Rich Tiliaceae Terrestrial Wild
234. Triumfetta rhomboidea Jacq. Tiliaceae Terrestrial Wild
235. Triumfetta rotundifolia Lam. Tiliaceae Terrestrial Wild
236. Turnera subulata Smith Turneraceae Terrestrial Exotic
237. Urena lobata L. subsp. lobata Malvaceae Terrestrial Wild
238. Urena lobata L. subsp. sinuata (L.) Borss. Malvaceae Terrestrial Wild
239. Vallisneria spiralis L. Hydrocharitaceae Aquatic Wild
240. Vanda tessellata (Roxb.) G.Don. Orchidaceae Epiphytic Wild
241. Vernonia cinerea (L.) Less. Asteraceae Terrestrial Wild
Grasses
1. Aeluropus lagopoides (Linn.) Trin. ex Thw. Poaceae Semi-aquatic Wild
2. Andropogon pumilus Roxb. Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
3. Aristida adscensionis L. Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
4. Aristida funiculata Trin & Rupr. Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
5. Aristida hystrix L. Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
6. Aristida setacea Retz. Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
7. Bothriochloa bladhii (Retz.) S. T. Blake Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
8. Bothriochloa pertusa (L.) A. Camus Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
9. Brachiaria ramosa (L.) Stapf Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
10. Brachiaria remota (Retz.) Haines Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
11. Cenchrus barbatus Schumach. Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
12. Cenchrus ciliaris L. Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
13. Cenchrus setigera Vahl. Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
14. Chloris barbata Sw. Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
15. Chloris dolichostachya Lagasca Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
16. Chloris tenella Koen. ex Roxb. Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 149
Sl. No. Species Family Habitat Type
17. Chrysopogon aciculatus (Retz.) Trin. Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
18. Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers. Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
19. Dactyloctenium aegyptium (L.) Willd. Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
20. Dactyloctenium aristatum Link. Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
21. Desmostachya bipinnata (L.) Stapf Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
22. Dicanthium annulatum (Forsk.) Stapf. Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
23. Digitaria bicornis (Lam.) Roem. & Schult. Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
24. Dinebra retroflexa (Vahl) Panzer Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
25. Echinochloa colona (L.) Link Poaceae Semi-aquatic Wild
26. Echinochloa crus-gulli (L.) P. Beauv. Poaceae Semi-aquatic Wild
27. Eleusine indica (L.) Gaertn. Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
28. Eragrostiella bifaria (Vahl) Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
29. Eragrostis maderaspatana Bor Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
30. Eragrostis minor Host Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
31. Eragrostis nigra Nees ex Steud. Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
32. Eragrostis nutans (Retz.) Nees ex Steud. Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
33. Eragrostis pilosa P. Beauv Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
34. Eragrostis sp. Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
35. Eragrostis unioloides (Retz.) Nees ex Steud. Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
36. Eragrostis viscosa (Retz.) Trin. Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
37. Eremopogon foveolatus (Del.) Stapf. Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
38. Heteropogon contortus (L.) P.Beauv Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
39. Imperata cylindrica (L.) Beauv. Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
40. Iseilema anthephoroides Hack. Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
41. Iseilema laxum Hack. Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
42. Manisuris myuros L. Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
43. Ophiuros exaltatus (Linnaeus) Kuntze Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
44. Oplismenus compositus (L.) P. Beauv. Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
45. Oropetium thomaeum (Linn.f.) Trin. Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
46. Panicum miliaceum L. Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
47. Panicum notatum Retz. Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
48. Panicum paludosum Roxb. Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
49. Panicum psilopodium Trin. Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
50. Panicum repens L. Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
51. Panicum trypheron Schult. Poaceae Semi-aquatic Wild
52. Paspalidium flavidum (Retz.) A. Camus. Poaceae Semi-aquatic Wild
53. Paspalum scrobiculatum L. Poaceae Semi-aquatic Wild
54. Pennisetum purpureum Schum Poaceae Terrestrial Planted
55. Phragmites karka Trin. ex Steud. Poaceae Semi-aquatic Wild
56. Rottboellia cochinchinensis (Lour.) Clayton Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
57. Sacciolepis indica (L.) Chase Poaceae Marshy Wild
58. Sehima nervosum (Rottl.) Stapf. Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
59. Sehima sulcatum (Hack.) A. Camus Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
60. Setaria italica (L.) P. Beauv Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
61. Spinifex littoreus (Burm.f.) Merr. Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
62. Sporobolus coromandelianus (Retz.) Kunth Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
63. Sporobolus indicus (L.) R.Br. Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
64. Sporobolus spicatus (Vahl.) Kunth Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
65. Sporobolus wallichii Munro ex Trimen Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 150
Sl. No. Species Family Habitat Type
66. Themeda quadrivalvis (L.) Kuntze Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
67. Themeda triandra Forssk. Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
68. Vetiveria zizanioides (L.) Nash. Poaceae Marshy Wild
69. Themeda quadrivalvis (L.) Kuntze Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
70. Themeda triandra Forssk. Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
71. Vetiveria zizanioides (L.) Nash. Poaceae Marshy Wild
Climbers
1. Ampelocissus latifolia (Roxb.) Planch. Vitaceae Terrestrial Wild
2. Aristolochia indica L. Aristolochiaceae Terrestrial Wild
3. Cardiospermum halicacabum L. Sapindaceae Terrestrial Wild
4. Cayratia pedata (Lam.) Juss. ex Gagnep. Vitaceae Terrestrial Wild
5. Cayratia trifolia (L.) Domin. Vitaceae Terrestrial Wild
6. Cissampelos pareira L. Menispermaceae Terrestrial Wild
7. Cissus quadrangularis L. Vitaceae Terrestrial Wild
8. Cissus repanda Vahl. Vitaceae Terrestrial Wild
9. Clitoria ternatea L. Fabaceae Terrestrial Wild
10. Coccinia grandis (L.) Voigt Cucurbitaceae Terrestrial Wild
11. Cocculus hirsutus (L.) Diels Menispermaceae Terrestrial Wild
12. Convolvulus arvensis L. Convolvulaceae Terrestrial Wild
13. Cuscuta reflexa Roxb. Convolvulaceae Terrestrial Wild
14. Diplocyclos palmatus (L.) Jeffrey Cucurbitaceae Terrestrial Wild
15. Hemidesmus indicus (L.) R. Br. Asclepiadaceae Terrestrial Wild
16. Ichnocarpus frutescens (L.) R.Br. Asclepiadaceae Terrestrial Wild
17. Ipomoea alba L. Convolvulaceae Terrestrial Wild
18. Ipomoea aquatica Forssk. Convolvulaceae Aquatic Wild
19. Ipomoea biloba Forssk. Convolvulaceae Marshy Wild
20. Ipomoea hederifolia L. Convolvulaceae Terrestrial Wild
21. Ipomoea pes-tigridis L. Convolvulaceae Terrestrial Wild
22. Ipomoea staphylina Roem. & Schultes Convolvulaceae Terrestrial Wild
23. Kedrostis foetidissima (Jacq.) Cogn. Cucurbitaceae Terrestrial Wild
24. Leptadenia reticulata Wight & Arn. Asclepiadaceae Terrestrial Wild
25. Mikania cordata (Burm. f.) Robinson Asteraceae Marshy Wild
26. Momordica dioica Roxb. ex. Willd. Cucurbitaceae Terrestrial Wild
27. Mukia maderaspatana (L.) M. Roem. Cucurbitaceae Terrestrial Wild
28. Oxystelma esculentum R. Br. Asclepiadaceae Marshy Wild
29. Passiflora foetida L. Passifloraceae Terrestrial Wild
30. Pentatropis microphylla L. Asclepiadaceae Terrestrial Wild
31. Pergularia daemia (Forrsk.) Chiov. Asclepiadaceae Terrestrial Wild
32. Solena amplexicaulis (Lam.) Gandhi Cucurbitaceae Terrestrial Wild *Source: Primary data collected by VSPL and supported through Secondary Literature
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 151
Figure 3.25: Family-wise distribution of Herbaceous Flora found in the Study Area
FAUNAL DIVERSITY
3.8.5.1 Mammals
The list of faunal species found in the study area has been compiled with the help of secondary sources
like Forest Working Plans and was supplemented with information provided by local people during field
surveys in the study area. To study the probable occurrence of mammals in the area, 2- 3 km long
transects and trails were walked at each sampling site for any sighting and also by collecting indirect
evidence gathered by talking to locals during interaction. For compilation of list aid from Forest Working
Plans was considered. A total of 15 mammalian species reported from the study area. List of
Mammalian species compiled from secondary sources as well-found during field survey is given in Table
3.32.
Table 3.32: Important Mammalian Species Found in the Study Area
S.No. Common Name Zoological Name IUCN Status WPA (1972) Status
1. Spotted deer Axis axis LC Sch III
2. Jackal Canis aureus LC Sch II (Part I)
3. Indian fox Vulpes benghalensis LC Sch II (Part I)
4. Jungle cat Felis chaus LC Sch II (Part I)
5. Common mongoose Herpestes edwardsii LC Sch II (Part I)
6. Black naped hare Lepus nigricollis LC Sch IV
7. Rhesus macaque Macaca mulatta LC Sch II (Part I)
8. Indian porcupine Hystrix indica LC Sch IV
9. Bandicoot rat Bandicota indica LC Sch IV
10. Three-striped palm squirrel Funambulus palmarum LC --
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 152
S.No. Common Name Zoological Name IUCN Status WPA (1972) Status
11. Asian Palm Civet Paradoxurus hermaphroditus LC Sch II (Part I)
12. Common Langur Presbytis entellus LC Sch II (Part I)
13. Wild Boar Sus scrofa LC Sch-III
14. Lesser dog -faced fruit bat Cynopterus brachyotis LC Sch-IV
15. Flying fox Pteropus giganteus LC Sch-III *Source: Primary data collected by VSPL and supported through Secondary Literature
Status assigned by International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN): LC=Least Concern
3.8.5.2 Herpetofauna
A total of 10 species of Amphibians and 33 species of reptiles were recorded during the survey period
(Table 3.33 & Table 3.34). Among the 22 species of reptiles 2 were turtles, 13 were lizards and 7 were
snakes.
Table 3.33: Amphibians recorded in and around the wetlands of Study Area
S.No. Common Name Zoological Name Family IUCN Status
WPA (1972) Status
1. Common Indian Toad Duttaphrynus melanostictus
Bufonidae LC --
2. Water Skipper or Skipper Frog
Euphlyctis cyanophlyctis Dicroglossidae LC --
3. Indian Pond or Green Frog Euphlyctis hexadactylus Dicroglossidae LC Sch-IV
4. Cricket Frog Fejervarya mudduraja Dicroglossidae -- --
5. Indian Bull Frog Hoplobatrachus tigerinus Dicroglossidae LC Sch-IV
6. Indian Burrowing Frog Sphaerotheca breviceps Dicroglossidae LC
7. Ornate Narrow-mouthed Frog
Microhyla ornata Microhylidae LC --
8. Narrow-mouthed Frog Ramanella sp. Microhylidae DD --
9. Lesser/Marbled Balloon Frog
Uperodon systoma Microhylidae LC --
10. Common Tree Frog Polypedates maculatus Rhacophoridae LC -- *Source: Primary data collected by VSPL and supported through Secondary Literature
Status assigned by International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN): LC=Least Concern; DD=Data Deficient
Table 3.34: Reptiles recorded in and around the wetlands of Study Area S.No Common Name Zoological Name IUCN Status WPA (1972) Status
Turtles
1. Indian Star Tortoise Geochelone elegans VU Sch-IV
2. Indian Black Turtle Melanochelys trijuga LC --
Lizards
1. Snake Skink Lygosoma punctatus LC --
2. Common Supple Skink Eutropis macularius -- --
3. Common Brahminy Skink Eutropis carinata LC --
4. Termite Hill Gecko Hemidactylus triedrus LC --
5. Southern House Gecko Hemidactylus frenatus LC --
6. Bark Gecko Hemidactylus leschnaulti -- --
7. Fan-throated Lizard Sitana ponticeriana LC --
8. Common Garden Lizard Calotes versicolor LC --
9. Forest calotes Calotes rouxi LC --
10. Indian Chameleon Chamaeleon zeylanicus VU Sch II (Part I)
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 153
S.No Common Name Zoological Name IUCN Status WPA (1972) Status
11. Indian Monitor Lizard Varanus bengalensis VU Sch I (Part II)
12. South Indian Rock Agama Psammophilus dorsalis LC --
13. Common Rat Lizard Ptylas mucosus LC --
Snakes
1. Brahminy Worm Snake Ramphotyplops braminus -- --
2. Common Sand Boa Gongylophis conicus NT --
3. Red Sand Boa Eryx johnii NT --
4. Indian Rock Python Python molurus NT Sch I (Part II)
5. Indian Rat Snake Ptyas mucosa LC Sch II (Part II)
6. Common Krait* Bungarus caeruleus LC --
7. Russell's Viper* Daboia russelii Sch II (Part II) *Source: Primary data collected by VSPL and supported through Secondary Literature
Status assigned by International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN): LC=Least Concern; VU=Vulnerable, NT=Near Threatened
3.8.5.3 Avifauna
To prepare inventory of the birds in the project influence area, bird species are recorded while walking
to and from the survey areas and identification done through their calls. Birds were identified using the
field guide of birds by Ali & Ripley (1983), Grimmett et al. (1998), Fleming et al. (1984) and Kazmierczak
and Perlo (2000). During the field surveys a total of 111 species were sighted. Out of the total 111 avi-
faunal species 25 species are migratory birds (Winter & Summer visitors). The details of Avi-faunal
species reported/recorded in the study area are enumerated in Table 3.35 as follows:
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 154
Table 3.35: Avi-Faunal Species recorded in and around the wetlands of Study Area
Sl. No. Family English Name Scientific Name Habitat Status IUCN status
Guild WPA
1. Psittacidae Alexandrine Parakeet Psittacula eupatria T R LC FR Sch- IV
2. Dicruridae Ashy Drongo Dicrurus leucophaeus T R LC IN Sch- IV
3. Sylviinae Ashy Prinia Prinia socialis T R LC IN Sch- IV
4. Alaudidae Ashy-crowned Sparrow Lark Eremopterix griseus T R LC IN Sch- IV
5. Cuculidae Asian Koel Eudynamys scolopacea T R LC FR Sch- IV
6. Ciconiidae Asian Openbill Anastomus oscitans A R LC PR Sch- IV
7. Apodidae Asian Palm Swift Cypsiurus balasiensis T R LC IN Sch- IV
8. Campephagidae Asian Paradise-flycatcher Terpsiphone paradisi T R LC IN Sch- IV
9. Sturnidae Asian Pied Starling Sturnus contra T R LC OM Sch- IV
10. Hirundinidae Barn Swallow Hirundo rustica T R LC IN Sch- IV
11. Ploceinae Baya Weaver Ploceus philippinus T R LC GR Sch- IV
12. Laniidae Bay-backed Shrike Lanius vittatus T R LC IN Sch- IV
13. Accipitridae Besra Accipiter virgatus T R LC PR Sch- IV
14. Ardeidae Black Bittern Dupetor flavicollis A R LC PI Sch- IV
15. Ardeidae Black Crowned Night Heron Nycticorax nycticorax A R LC PI Sch- IV
16. Dicruridae Black Drongo Dicrurus macrocercus T R LC IN Sch- IV
17. Accipitridae Black Kite Milvus migrans T R LC SC Sch- IV
18. Laridae Black-bellied Tern Sterna acuticauda A R NT PI Sch- IV
19. Alcedinidae Black-capped Kingfisher Halcyon pileata A R LC PI Sch- IV
20. Alaudidae Black-crowned Sparrow Lark Eremopterix nigriceps T R LC IN Sch- IV
21. Laridae Black-headed Gull Larus ridibundus A WV LC PI Sch- IV
22. Threskiornithidae Black-headed Ibis Threskiornis melanocephalus
A R NT PR Sch- IV
23. Estrildidae Black-headed Munia Lonchura malacca T R LC GR Sch- IV
24. Oriolidae Black-hooded Oriole Oriolus xanthornus T R LC OM Sch- IV
25. Accipitridae Black-shouldered Kite Elanus caeruleus T R LC PR Sch- IV
26. Recurvirostridae Black-winged Stilt Himantopus himantopus A R LC IN Sch- IV
27. Turdinae Blue-capped Rock Thrush Monticola cinclorhynchus T SV LC IN Sch- IV
28. Alcedinidae Blue-eared Kingfisher Alcedo meninting A R LC PI Sch- IV
29. Cuculidae Blue-faced Malkoha Phaenicophaeus viridirostris T R LC FR Sch- IV
30. Meropidae Blue-tailed Bee-eater Merops philippinus T R LC IN Sch- IV
31. Sylviinae Blyth's Reed Warbler Acrocephalus dumetorum T WV LC IN Sch- IV
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 155
Sl. No. Family English Name Scientific Name Habitat Status IUCN status
Guild WPA
32. Accipitridae Brahminy Kite Haliastur indus T R LC SC Sch- IV
33. Sturnidae Brahminy Starling Sturnus pagodarum T R LC OM Sch- IV
34. Jacanidae Bronze-winged Jacana Metopidius indicus A R LC OM Sch- IV
35. Laniidae Brown Shrike Lanius cristatus T WV LC IN Sch- IV
36. Capitonidae Brown-headed Barbet Megalaima zeylanica T R LC FR Sch- IV
37. Laridae Brown-headed Gull Larus brunnicephalus A WV LC PI Sch- IV
38. Ardeidae Cattle Egret Bubulcus ibis A R LC IN Sch- IV
39. Meropidae Chestnut-headed Bee-eater Merops leschenaulti T R LC IN Sch- IV
40. Ardeidae Cinnamon Bittern Ixobrychus cinnamomeus A R LC PI Sch- IV
41. Motacillidae Citrine Wagtail Motacilla citreola T WV LC IN Sch- IV
42. Rallidae Common Coot Fulica atra A R LC OM Sch- IV
43. Picidae Common Flameback Dinopium javanense T R LC IN Sch- IV
44. Scolopacidae Common Greenshank Tringa nebularia A WV LC IN Sch- IV
45. Cuculidae Common Hawk Cuckoo Hierococcyx varius T R LC IN Sch- IV
46. Upupidae Common Hoopoe Upupa epops T SV LC IN Sch- IV
47. Irenidae Common Iora Aegithina tiphia T R LC IN Sch- IV
48. Falconidae Common Kestrel Falco tinnunculus T WV LC PR Sch- IV
49. Alcedinidae Common Kingfisher Alcedo atthis A R LC PI Sch- IV
50. Rallidae Common Moorhen Gallinula chloropus A R LC OM Sch- IV
51. Sturnidae Common Myna Acridotheres tristis T R LC OM Sch- IV
52. Anatidae Common Poachard Aythya ferina A WV LC OM Sch- IV
53. Scolopacidae Common Redshank Tringa totanus A WV LC IN Sch- IV
54. Charadriidae Common Ringed Plover Charadrius hiaticula A WV LC IN Sch- IV
55. Scolopacidae Common Sandpiper Actitis hypoleucos A WV LC IN Sch- IV
56. Scolopacidae Common Snipe Gallinago gallinago A R LC IN Sch- IV
57. Sylviinae Common Tailorbird Orthotomus atrogularis T R LC IN Sch- IV
58. Anatidae Common Teal Anas crecca A WV LC OM Sch- IV
59. Capitonidae Coppersmith Barbet Megalaima haemacephala T R LC FR Sch- IV
60. Anatidae Cotton Pygmy-Goose Nettapus coromandelianus A R LC OM Sch- IV
61. Hemiprocnidae Crested Treeswift Hemiprocne coronata T R LC IN Sch- IV
62. Scolopacidae Curlew Sandpiper Calidris ferruginea A WV LC IN Sch- IV
63. Anhingidae Darter Anhinga melanogaster A R NT PI Sch- IV
64. Columbidae Eurasian Collared Dove Streptopelia decaocta T R LC GR Sch- IV
65. Scolopacidae Eurasian Curlew Numenius arquata A WV NT IN Sch- IV
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 156
Sl. No. Family English Name Scientific Name Habitat Status IUCN status
Guild WPA
66. Strigidae Eurasian Eagle Owl Bubo bubo T R LC PR Sch- IV
67. Oriolidae Eurasian Golden Oriole Oriolus oriolus T SV LC OM Sch- IV
68. Accipitridae Eurasian Marsh Harrier Circus aeruginosus T WV LC PR Sch- IV
69. Accipitridae Eurasian Sparrowhawk Accipiter nisus T R LC PR Sch- IV
70. Threskiornithidae Eurasian Spoonbill Platalea leucorodia A R NT OM Sch- IV
71. Anatidae Eurasian Wigeon Anas penelope A WV LC OM Sch- IV
72. Anatidae Fulvous Whistling Duck Dendrocygna bicolor A R LC OM Sch- IV
73. Anatidae Gargany Teal Anas querquedula A WV LC OM Sch- IV
74. Phalacrocoracidae Great Cormorant Phalacrocorax carbo A R LC PI Sch- IV
75. Podicipedidae Great Crested Grebe Podiceps cristatus A WV LC PI Sch- IV
76. Laridae Great Crested Tern Sterna bergii A R LC PI Sch- IV
77. Cuculidae Greater Coucal Centropus sinensis T R LC IN Sch- IV
78. Ardeidae Greater Egret Casmerodius albus A R LC IN Sch- IV
79. Estrildidae Green Avadavat Amandava formosa T R VU GR Sch- IV
80. Scolopacidae Green Sandpiper Tringa ochropus A WV LC IN Sch- IV
81. Phasianidae Grey Francolin Francolinus pondicerianus T R LC OM Sch- IV
82. Ardeidae Grey Heron Ardea cinerea A R LC PI Sch- IV
83. Motacillidae Grey Wagtail Motacilla cinerea T WV LC IN Sch- IV
84. Charadriidae Grey-headed Lapwing Vanellus cinereus A WV LC IN Sch- IV
85. Corvidae House Crow Corvus splendens T R LC SC Sch- IV
86. Passerinae House Sparrow Passer domesticus T R LC GR Sch- IV
87. Apodidae House Swift Apus affinis T R LC IN Sch- IV
88. Phalacrocoracidae Indian Cormorant Phalacrocorax fuscicollis A R LC PI Sch- IV
89. Bucerotidae Indian Grey Hornbill Ocyceros birostris T R LC FR Sch- IV
90. Caprimulgidae Indian Nightjar Caprimulgus asiaticus T R LC IN Sch- IV
91. Phasianidae Indian Peafowl Pavo cristatus T R LC OM Sch- I
92. Pittidae Indian Pitta Pitta brachyura T R LC IN Sch- IV
93. Ardeidae Indian Pond Heron Ardeola grayii A R LC PI Sch- IV
94. Turdinae Indian Robin Saxicoloides fulicata T R LC IN Sch- IV
95. Coraciidae Indian Roller Coracias benghalensis T R LC IN Sch- IV
96. Estrildidae Indian Silverbill Lonchura malabarica T R LC GR Sch- IV
97. Ardeidae Intermediate Egret Mesophoyx intermedia A R LC IN Sch- IV
98. Scolopacidae Jack Snipe Lymnocryptes minimus A WV LC IN Sch- IV
99. Timaliinae Jungle Babbler Turdoides striatus T R LC IN Sch- IV
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 157
Sl. No. Family English Name Scientific Name Habitat Status IUCN status
Guild WPA
100. Corvidae Jungle Crow Corvus macrorhynchos T R LC SC Sch- IV
101. Sturnidae Jungle Myna Acridotheres fuscus T R LC OM Sch- IV
102. Sylviinae Jungle Prinia Prinia sylvatica T R LC IN Sch- IV
103. Scolopacidae Kentish Plover Charadrius alexandrinus A WV LC IN Sch- IV
104. Campephagidae Large Cuckooshrike Coracina macei T R LC IN Sch- IV
105. Turdinae Large Grey Babbler Turdoides malcolmi T R LC IN Sch- IV
106. Columbidae Laughing Dove Streptopelia senegalensis T R LC GR Sch- IV
107. Cuculidae Lesser Coucal Centropus bengalensis T R LC IN Sch- IV
108. Anatidae Lesser Whistling Duck Dendrocygna javanica A R LC OM Sch- IV
109. Laridae Lesser-crested Tern Sterna bengalensis A WV LC PI Sch- IV
110. Phalacrocoracidae Little Cormorant Phalacrocorax niger A R LC PI Sch- IV
111. Ardeidae Little Egret Egretta garzetta A R LC IN Sch- IV
112. Ciconiidae Painted stork Mycteria leucocephala A WV NT PI Sch- IV
113. Pelecanidae Spot-billed pelican Pelecanus philippensis A WV NT PI Sch- IV Where: T-Terrestrial; W-water bird; R-Resident; WR-Widespread resident; WV-Winter visitor; SV-Summer visitor; WWV-Wisespread winter visitor; BR- Breading resident; LC-
Least concern; VU-Vulnerable; EN-Endangered; NT-Near threatened; IN-Insectivorous; OM-Omnivorus; PR-Predators; FR-Frugivorous; PI- Piscivorous; GR-Granivorous; NE-Nectarivorous; SC-Scavengers; S I-Schedule I; S IV-Schedule IV; IWPA-Indian Wildlife Protection Act.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 158
3.8.5.4 RET status of fauna
Out of the total 15 mammalian species recorded from the study area Seven (07) species were classified
under Scheduled-II (Par-I) and Three (03) species under Schedule-III and four (04) species under
Schedule-IV. While No mammalian Species were listed under Schedule-I of the Wildlife (Protection), Act,
1972.
No mammalian species is listed under IUCN Red list of Threatened Species Version 2019.3 as Rare,
Endangered and Threatened (RET) Species.
With regards to amphibian species two (02) species were listed under Schedule-IV while no schedule-I, II
& III species were found in the study area. Similarly no herpetofauna of ecological importance were
found in the study area as per IUCN Red List.
S.No. Common Name Scientific name Wildlife
Schedule
Reptiles
1. Indian Monitor Lizard Varanus bengalensis Schedule I (Part II)
2. Indian Rock Python Pyhton molurus Schedule I (Part II)
Avifauna (Birds)
1. Indian Peafowl Pavo cristatus Schedule I
Among Reptiles One (01) Schedule-I, three (03) Schedule-II and One (01) Schedule-IV species were found
in the study area. With regards to IUCN Red list of Threatened Species Version 2019.3 as Rare,
Endangered and Threatened (RET) Species, three (03) Vulnerable and three (03) Near Threatened
Reptile species were found in the study area.
With regards to the avifaunal species one (01) Schedule-I were reported/observed in the study area,
whereas five (05) avi-faunal specie are listed as Near Threatened (NT) and one (01) species is listed
under Vulnerable category of IUCN Red list of Threatened Species Version 2019.3.
3.8.5.5 PROTECTED HABITATS
No Ecological Sensitive location (National Park, Wildlife Sanctuaries, Biosphere reserves) are located
within the 10 km radius of the proposed project.
3.8.5.6 BHAVANAPADU CREEK AREA
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 159
Location Division Mandal Latitude Longitude Type of wetland
Bhavanapdu Tekkali Santhabommali 180 33′ 35.08″ N 840 20′ 35.56″ E Natural
The Bhavanapadu Creek mouth is an ecosystem harbouring rich and vulnerable species. The bird
biodiversity is quite rich. Black Bellied Tern, Black Headed Ibis and Eurasian Curlew are the ‘Near
Threatened’ and Eurasian Open Bill and Pallied Harrier are ‘Near Threatened’ and Schedule –I bird
species and White Bellied Sea Eagle is the Schedule-I bird found here.
Figure 3.26: Creek Mouth Biodiversity
(LIST OF FISH FAUNA AND LIST OF MANGROVES ALSO BE INCLUDED
3.9 AQUATIC ECOLOGY
Water and ecological quality are the important concern for human use of lentic and lotic ecosystems.
These water bodies have significant economic values including hydropower generation, supplying water
for drinking water for irrigation, providing food via fish and aquatic products, and preserving the health
and biodiversity of important life support ecosystem. However, all these functions depend on a well-
balanced environment in terms of its physical, chemical and biological variables. Like water quality
monitoring, biological or aquatic monitoring is an ecosystem assessment tool which can be used as the
basis for management programmes, restoring and maintaining the physico-chemical and biological
integrity of freshwater. Live organisms provide valuable information by their presence, absence and
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 160
abundance regarding their surrounding habitat and can be used to evaluate the local environmental
impact by their physical, chemical and biological properties and their cumulative effects.
In the present project, to assess the aquatic ecological status, aquatic micro-phytoplankton, micro-
zooplankton, macro-invertebrates and benthos was monitored within study area of Bhavanapadu
project. Samples have been collected from 4 locations in the study area covering three seasons viz. post
Monsoon(October 2020), Pre-monsoon (April 2021) and Monsoon (September 2021) for analysis of
aquatic ecological parameters. Primary data regarding fisheries, fish diversity composition, their
migration and breeding grounds has been collected from the study area, where as secondary data on
fish and fisheries has also been collected
METHODOLOGY FOR AQUATIC STUDY
Collection and preservation of Phytoplankton sample: The plankton samples were collected from sub
surface water. In the case of phytoplankton, 500 ml sample water was collected in polyethylene bottles
and 1ml of Lugol’s solution was added for fixation and preservation. The samples were centrifuged and
decanted. A volume of 10 ml was collected in double stoppered polyethylene bottles for further
qualitative analysis of phytoplankton. Identification of phytoplankton was done with the help of
standard books and monographs (Turner, 1892; smith, 1924, Ward and Whipple 1959).
Collection and preservation of Zooplankton sample: The zooplankton samples were collected by
filtering 100 liters of sub-surface water through plankton net made up of bolting silk cloth no 20. A sub
sample of 30 ml was collected again, in polyethylene double stoppered bottles and 4-5 drops of formalin
and glycerin were added. The samples were stored for further qualitative and quantitative study of
zooplanktonic organism. The identification of zooplankton was done up to species in most cases,
according to the reference books including that of Ward and Wipples (1959), Koste (1978), Battish
(1992) and Dhanapathi (2000).
Collection and preservation of macro-invertebrate and benthic samples: Samples have been collected
on monthly basis with the help of Ekman’s dredge, scoop and D-frame nets. Samples were sieved
through a sieve having mesh size of 0.5 to 0.6 mm. The animals were picked up by hand picking and
preserved in 4% formalin solution.
SAMPLING LOCATIONS
Marine water samples were collected from 4 locations (M-3 to M-6) covering 3 seasons, for analysis of
aquatic ecological status. The aquatic study was conducted at four monitoring locations in the project
area. Monitoring was conducted for three seasons at all the four sampling sites. For better
understanding, average value of all three seasons’ data is presented in subsequent sections of this
report.
Table 3.36: Location of Aquatic Studies
S.N. Location Description of Water body Co-ordinates
North East
1 M-3 MARINE 18°36'6.99"N 84°25'9.08"E
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 161
S.N. Location Description of Water body Co-ordinates
North East
2 M-4 MARINE 18°30'43.18"N 84°25'7.31"E
3 M-5 MARINE 18°28'21.41"N 84°20'41.55"E
4 M-6 MARINE 18°27'25.00"N 84°15'18.17"E
PHYTOPLANKTON AND ZOOPLANKTON
Phytoplankton’s are microscopic aquatic plants, occurring as unicellular, colonial or filamentous forms,
without any resistance to currents, and are free floated or suspended in open waters. They are
photosynthetic organism and are grazed by zooplankton at relevant trophic level. Results revel that
total 46 species of phytoplankton were identified.
The data on frequency, density, abundance and diversity index (Shannon Wiener) of Phytoplankton and
Zooplankton at different locations for Post Monsoon season – October 2020 has been presented in
Table 3.37 to Table 3.40. The population density of phytoplankton was varied at all the sampling sites.
The Aquatic Ecology Sampling Photograph is shown as Figure 3.27.
Table 3.37: Density, Frequency, Abundance and Shanon Wiener diversity Index (H) of Phytoplankton and Zooplanktons at M-3 (Post - Monsoon, Oct 2020)
S.No Phyto-planktons and Zoo -planktons Density
(Org/Liter) Frequency (%) Abundance
Diversity
Index
(Shannon Wiener)
Chlorophyta
Ulvaceae
1 Ulvaceae fosciata 12 16 3 0.105
2 Ulvaceae lactuca 12 10 1 0.058
3 Entermorpha compressa 10 24 3 0.098
4 Entermorpha intestinailis 3 8 1 0.022
Cladophoraceae
5 Chetomorpha antennia 8 12 2 0.076
6 Chetomorpha brachygona 12 8 1 0.018
7 Chetomorpha torta 8 4 1 0.006
8 Cladophora socillis 6 16 2 0.078
9 Cladophora utriculosa 27 34 5 0.156
10 Cladophora fasicularis 23 30 5 0.148
11 Cladophora colabense 23 34 4 0.141
12 Spongomorpha indica 10 13 2 0.074
Phaeophyta
13 Ectocarpus mitchellae 16 20 3 0.084
14 Chnoospora minima 6 8 2 0.064
16 Dictyata dichotoma 7 13 1 0.049
15 Padina tertastromatica 17 34 4 0.122
17 Sargassum vulgare 12 28 3 0.099
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 162
S.No Phyto-planktons and Zoo -planktons Density
(Org/Liter) Frequency (%) Abundance
Diversity
Index
(Shannon Wiener)
18 Sargassum ilicifolium 2 4 1 0.030
19 Sargassum polycestum 3 4 1 0.043
20 Sargassum tenerrium 8 12 2 0.076
21 Gifforidia indica 23 34 4 0.141
Rhodophyta
22 Porphyra vietnamensis 4 8 2 0.049
23 Bangiopsis subsimplex 16 20 3 0.084
24 Geldiopsis variabilis 2 4 1 0.030
25 Geldium pusillum 3 4 1 0.043
26 Petrocladia hetroplatos 5 8 2 0.056
27 Amphiroa fragilissima 27 32 6 0.165
28 Grateloupia lithophila 5 12 2 0.059
29 Grateloupia filicina 8 12 2 0.076
30 Gracilania corticata 27 34 5 0.156
31 Gracilania textori 41 58 8 0.204
32 Gracilania edulis 19 22 3 0.096
33 Hyprea valentiae 5 8 2 0.056
34 Hyprea musciformis 40 48 9 0.207
35 Gigartima acicularis 16 20 3 0.084
36 Liagora erecta 2 4 1 0.030
37 Centrocelos clavulatum 3 4 1 0.043
38 Bryocladia thuraitesis 1 4 4 0.011
39 Wrangelia argus 27 32 6 0.165
40 Bryopis pennata 8 12 2 0.076
Chlorophyceae
41 Closterium dianae 5 12 2 0.059
42 Coelastrummicroporum 8 12 2 0.076
43 Pediastrum duplex 27 34 5 0.156
44 Pediastrum simplex 14 8 2 0.049
45 Peridiniuminconspicum 12 22 3 0.096
Total 590
3.813
Zooplanktons
46 Copepod 5 8 2 0.056
47 Decapods 12 8 1 0.018
48 pteropod 14 20 3 0.084
49 lamillibranchs 19 22 3 0.096
50 Gastropods 8 12 2 0.076
51 Lucifer spp 2 8 2 0.056
52 Fish eggs 2 4 1 0.030
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 163
S.No Phyto-planktons and Zoo -planktons Density
(Org/Liter) Frequency (%) Abundance
Diversity
Index
(Shannon Wiener)
53 Phoronids 14 20 3 0.084
54 Eumuliercula casta (Oligocheates) 16 20 3 0.084
55 Asterigerina (Foraminifera) 10 13 2 0.074
56 Collotheca pelagica (rotifier) 5 12 2 0.059
57 Medusea 8 12 2 0.076
58 Siphanophore 12 8 1 0.018
59 Appendicularia 2 8 2 0.056
60 Phoronids 2 4 1 0.030
Total 131
0.897
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 164
Table 3.38: Density, Frequency, Abundance and Shanon Wiener diversity Index (H) of Phytoplankton
and Zooplanktons at M-4 (Post - Monsoon, Oct 2020)
S.N. Phyto-planktons Density
(Org/Liter) Frequency (%) Abundance
Diversity Index
(Shannon Wiener)
Chlorophyta
Ulvaceae
1 Ulvaceae fosciata 6 8 2 0.064
2 Ulvaceae lactuca 3 4 1 0.043
3 Entermorpha compressa 1 4 4 0.011
4 Entermorpha intestinailis 08 14 3 0.105
Cladophoraceae
5 Chetomorpha antennia 7 19 5 0.128
6 Chetomorpha brachygona 11 33 9 0.205
7 Chetomorpha torta 21 14 18 0.290
8 Cladophora socillis 20 23 19 0.234
9 Cladophora utriculosa 08 14 3 0.105
10 Cladophora fasicularis 12 10 1 0.058
11 Cladophora colabense 08 18 3 0.098
12 Spongomorpha indica 5 6 2 0.074
Phaeophyta
13 Ectocarpus mitchellae 15 28 3 0.119
14 Chnoospora minima 6 8 2 0.064
16 Dictyata dichotoma 7 13 1 0.049
15 Padina tertastromatica 10 25 4 0.122
17 Sargassum vulgare 18 28 3 0.099
18 Sargassum ilicifolium 15 23 4 0.127
19 Sargassum polycestum 22 26 5 0.156
20 Sargassum tenerrium 12 10 5 0.148
21 Gifforidia indica 20 24 4 0.141
Rhodophyta
22 Porphyra vietnamensis 4 8 2 0.049
23 Bangiopsis subsimplex 16 20 3 0.084
24 Geldiopsis variabilis 2 4 1 0.030
25 Geldium pusillum 3 4 1 0.043
26 Petrocladia hetroplatos 1 4 4 0.011
27 Amphiroa fragilissima 27 32 6 0.165
28 Grateloupia lithophila 5 12 2 0.059
29 Grateloupia filicina 8 12 2 0.076
30 Gracilania corticata 24 26 6 0.145
31 Gracilania textori 18 16 8 0.204
32 Gracilania edulis 19 22 3 0.096
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 165
S.N. Phyto-planktons Density
(Org/Liter) Frequency (%) Abundance
Diversity Index
(Shannon Wiener)
33 Hyprea valentiae 5 8 2 0.056
34 Hyprea musciformis 12 15 9 0.207
35 Gigartima acicularis 16 20 3 0.084
36 Liagora erecta 2 4 1 0.030
37 Centrocelos clavulatum 3 4 1 0.043
38 Bryocladia thuraitesis 1 4 4 0.011
39 Wrangelia argus 27 32 6 0.165
40 Bryopis pennata 8 12 2 0.076
Chlorophyceae
41 Closterium dianae 12 16 3 0.105
42 Coelastrummicroporum 12 10 1 0.058
43 Pediastrum duplex 10 24 3 0.098
44 Pediastrum simplex 10 13 2 0.074
45 Peridiniuminconspicum 19 22 3 0.096
Total 463 3.725
Zooplanktons
46 Copepod 5 8 2 0.056
47 Decapods 16 21 9 0.207
48 pteropod 13 23 10 0.152
49 lamillibranchs 6 21 7 0.132
50 Gastropods 7 19 5 0.128
51 Lucifer spp 11 33 9 0.205
52 Fish eggs 21 14 18 0.290
53 Phoronids 20 23 19 0.234
54 Eumuliercula casta (Oligocheates) 10 30 9 0.179
55 Asterigerina (Foraminifera) 8 19 6 0.100
56 Collotheca pelagica (rotifier) 13 28 12 0.206
57 Medusea 5 13 3 0.082
58 Siphanophore 13 32 11 0.228
59 Appendicularia 7 20 5 0.121
60 Phoronids 11 32 9 0.205
Total 166
2.52
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 166
Table 3.39: Density, Frequency, Abundance and Shanon Wiener diversity Index (H) of Phytoplankton and Zooplanktons at M-5 (Post - Monsoon, Oct 2020)
S.N. Phyto-planktons and
zoo- planktons
Density
(Org/Liter) Frequency (%) Abundance
Diversity
Index
(Shannon Wiener)
Chlorophyta
Ulvaceae
1 Ulvaceae fosciata 10 15 7 0.074
2 Ulvaceae lactuca 18 40 15 0.171
3 Entermorpha compressa 2 4 2 0.016
4 Entermorpha intestinailis 4 9 4 0.029
Cladophoraceae
5 Chetomorpha antennia 10 13 2 0.074
6 Chetomorpha brachygona 12 8 1 0.018
7 Chetomorpha torta 8 4 1 0.006
8 Cladophora socillis 6 16 2 0.078
9 Cladophora utriculosa 12 16 3 0.105
10 Cladophora fasicularis 12 10 1 0.058
11 Cladophora colabense 10 24 3 0.098
12 Spongomorpha indica 10 13 2 0.074
Phaeophyta
13 Ectocarpus mitchellae 5 25 5 0.021
14 Chnoospora minima 17 0 13 0.117
16 Dictyata dichotoma 21 33 17 0.209
15 Padina tertastromatica 11 40 9 0.113
17 Sargassum vulgare 15 0 12 0.100
18 Sargassum ilicifolium 6 38 7 0.076
19 Sargassum polycestum 7 53 7 0.071
20 Sargassum tenerrium 4 33 4 0.090
21 Gifforidia indica 27 9 20 0.206
Rhodophyta
22 Porphyra vietnamensis 4 8 2 0.049
23 Bangiopsis subsimplex 16 20 3 0.084
24 Geldiopsis variabilis 2 4 1 0.030
25 Geldium pusillum 3 4 1 0.043
26 Petrocladia hetroplatos 1 4 4 0.011
27 Amphiroa fragilissima 27 32 6 0.165
28 Grateloupia lithophila 5 12 2 0.059
29 Grateloupia filicina 8 12 2 0.076
30 Gracilania corticata 8 12 2 0.076
31 Gracilania textori 16 20 3 0.084
32 Gracilania edulis 19 22 3 0.096
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 167
S.N. Phyto-planktons and
zoo- planktons
Density
(Org/Liter) Frequency (%) Abundance
Diversity
Index
(Shannon Wiener)
33 Hyprea valentiae 5 8 2 0.056
34 Hyprea musciformis 3 4 1 0.043
35 Gigartima acicularis 16 20 3 0.084
36 Liagora erecta 2 4 1 0.030
37 Centrocelos clavulatum 3 4 1 0.043
38 Bryocladia thuraitesis 1 4 4 0.011
39 Wrangelia argus 27 32 6 0.165
40 Bryopis pennata 8 12 2 0.076
Chlorophyceae
41 Closterium dianae 5 12 2 0.05
42 Coelastrummicroporum 8 12 2 0.076
43 Pediastrum duplex 16 16 6 0.145
44 Pediastrum simplex 21 28 8 0.204
45 Peridiniuminconspicum 19 22 3 0.096
Total 448 3.44
Zooplanktons
46 Copepod 5 8 2 0.056
47 Decapods 06 16 2 0.078
48 pteropod 5 12 2 0.059
49 lamillibranchs 8 12 2 0.076
50 Gastropods 2 4 1 0.030
51 Lucifer spp 3 4 1 0.043
52 Fish eggs 1 4 4 0.011
53 Phoronids 2 4 1 0.030
54 Eumuliercula casta (Oligocheates) 8 4 1 0.006
55 Asterigerina (Foraminifera) 6 16 2 0.078
56 Collotheca pelagica (rotifier) 12 16 3 0.105
57 Medusea 8 4 1 0.006
58 Siphanophore 10 13 2 0.074
59 Appendicularia 6 8 2 0.064
60 Phoronids 3 4 1 0.043
Total 85
0.759
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 168
Table 3.40: Density, Frequency, Abundance and Shanon Wiener diversity Index (H) of Phytoplankton and Zooplanktons at M-6 (Post - Monsoon, Oct 2020)
S.N. Phyto-planktons and
Zoo -planktons
Density
(Org/Liter) Frequency (%) Abundance
Diversity
Index
(Shannon Wiener)
Chlorophyta
Ulvaceae
1 Ulvaceae fosciata 1 3 1 0.019
2 Ulvaceae lactuca 3 13 4 0.023
3 Entermorpha compressa 9 25 6 0.043
4 Entermorpha intestinailis 11 28 12 0.030
Cladophoraceae
5 Chetomorpha antennia 10 13 2 0.074
6 Chetomorpha brachygona 12 8 1 0.018
7 Chetomorpha torta 8 4 1 0.006
8 Cladophora socillis 6 16 2 0.078
9 Cladophora utriculosa 12 16 3 0.105
10 Cladophora fasicularis 12 10 1 0.058
11 Cladophora colabense 10 24 3 0.098
12 Spongomorpha indica 10 13 2 0.074
Phaeophyta
13 Ectocarpus mitchellae 1 6 2 0.057
14 Chnoospora minima 1 5 3 0.067
16 Dictyata dichotoma 4 10 11 0.022
15 Padina tertastromatica 2 2 5 0.015
17 Sargassum vulgare 4 4 15 0.173
18 Sargassum ilicifolium 3 5 3 0.019
19 Sargassum polycestum 1 2 6 0.010
20 Sargassum tenerrium 2 4 5 0.011
21 Gifforidia indica 23 34 4 0.141
Rhodophyta
22 Porphyra vietnamensis 4 8 2 0.049
23 Bangiopsis subsimplex 16 20 3 0.084
24 Geldiopsis variabilis 2 4 1 0.030
25 Geldium pusillum 3 4 1 0.043
26 Petrocladia hetroplatos 1 4 4 0.011
27 Amphiroa fragilissima 27 32 6 0.165
28 Grateloupia lithophila 5 12 2 0.059
29 Grateloupia filicina 8 12 2 0.076
30 Gracilania corticata 16 12 6 0.064
31 Gracilania textori 4 6 8 0.204
32 Gracilania edulis 19 22 3 0.096
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 169
S.N. Phyto-planktons and
Zoo -planktons
Density
(Org/Liter) Frequency (%) Abundance
Diversity
Index
(Shannon Wiener)
33 Hyprea valentiae 5 8 2 0.056
34 Hyprea musciformis 6 8 9 0.050
35 Gigartima acicularis 16 20 3 0.084
36 Liagora erecta 2 4 1 0.030
37 Centrocelos clavulatum 3 4 1 0.043
38 Bryocladia thuraitesis 1 4 4 0.011
39 Wrangelia argus 8 10 6 0.165
40 Bryopis pennata 8 12 2 0.076
Chlorophyceae
41 Closterium dianae 5 10 2 0.059
42 Coelastrummicroporum 8 12 2 0.076
43 Pediastrum duplex 6 3 6 0.145
44 Pediastrum simplex 4 8 8 0.204
45 Peridiniuminconspicum 10 08 3 0.096
Total 332 4.22
Zooplanktons
46 Copepod 5 8 2 0.056
47 Decapods 5 6 9 0.0207
48 pteropod 2 7 5 0.083
49 lamillibranchs 3 16 11 0.192
50 Gastropods 2 18 7 0.175
51 Lucifer spp 2 11 4 0.104
52 Fish eggs 2 12 7 0.164
53 Phoronids 1 9 4 0.104
54 Eumuliercula casta (Oligocheates) 4 10 11 0.022
55 Asterigerina (Foraminifera) 2 2 5 0.015
56 Collotheca pelagica (rotifier) 4 4 15 0.173
57 Medusea 5 10 2 0.059
58 Siphanophore 8 12 2 0.076
59 Appendicularia 6 3 6 0.145
60 Phoronids 8 12 2 0.076
Total 59
1.36
The average of data of frequency, density, abundance and diversity index (Shannon Wiener) of benthic
organisms at different locations for Post-Monsoon season (October, 2020) has been presented in Table
3.41 through Table 3.44.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 170
Table 3.41: Average of data of Frequency, Density, Abundance and Shanon Wiener Diversity Index (H) of Benthic Organisms at M-3 Post - Monsoon, Oct 2020)
S.N Benthic Organisms Density
(ind.m-2) Frequency (%) Abundance Diversity Index (Shannon Wiener)
1 Euniphysa 1 3 1 0.019
2 Namalycastis 3 13 4 0.103
3 Nephtys 9 25 6 0.143
4 Magelona 11 28 12 0.200
5 Aryandes 6 15 4 0.107
6 Sabellidae 4 12 3 0.083
7 Millepora 14 29 11 0.241
8 Adelopora 23 39 20 0.315
9 Cyclohelia 29 43 21 0.307
10 Errina 24 44 19 0.316
Total 124 1.834
Table 3.42: Average of data of Frequency, Density, Abundance and Shanon Wiener Diversity Index (H)
of Benthic Organisms at M-4 (Post-Monsoon, Oct 2020)
S.N Benthic Organisms Density
(ind.m-2)
Frequency
(%) Abundance
Diversity Index
(Shannon Wiener)
1 Euniphysa 5 18 5 0.117
2 Namalycastis 17 49 13 0.270
3 Nephtys 12 31 9 0.181
4 Magelona 7 29 6 0.170
5 Aryandes 14 45 12 0.245
6 Sabellidae 7 18 5 0.093
7 Millepora 23 39 20 0.315
8 Adelopora 14 40 11 0.193
9 Cyclohelia 17 48 14 0.267
10 Errina 9 27 7 0.159
Total 125 2.01
Table 3.43: Average of data of Frequency, Density, Abundance and Shanon Wiener Diversity Index (H)
of Benthic Organisms at M-5 (Post-Monsoon, Oct 2020)
S.N Benthic Organisms Density
(ind.m-2)
Frequency
(%) Abundance
Diversity Index
(Shannon Wiener)
1 Euniphysa 5 25 5 0.131
2 Namalycastis 17 0 13 0.217
3 Nephtys 20 33 17 0.309
4 Magelona 11 40 9 0.213
5 Aryandes 15 0 12 0.200
6 Sabellidae 6 38 7 0.107
7 Millepora 17 48 14 0.267
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 171
S.N Benthic Organisms Density
(ind.m-2)
Frequency
(%) Abundance
Diversity Index
(Shannon Wiener)
8 Adelopora 4 33 4 0.090
9 Cyclohelia 21 9 20 0.286
10 Errina 11 28 12 0.200
Total 127 2.02
Table 3.44: Average of data of Frequency, Density, Abundance and Shanon Wiener Diversity Index (H)
of Benthic Organisms at M-6 (Post-Monsoon, Oct 2020)
S.N Benthic Organisms Density
(ind.m-2)
Frequency
(%) Abundance Diversity Index (Shannon Wiener)
1 Euniphysa 1 1 1 0.011
2 Namalycastis 5 11 4 0.155
3 Nephtys 23 46 14 0.120
4 Magelona 3 7 3 0.121
5 Aryandes 17 35 11 0.146
6 Sabellidae 14 31 13 0.213
7 Millepora 25 50 18 0.301
8 Adelopora 10 25 7 0.152
9 Cyclohelia 18 40 15 0.271
10 Errina 2 4 2 0.169
Total 118 1.627
The data on frequency, density, abundance and diversity index (Shannon Wiener) of phytoplankton and
Zooplankton at different locations for Pre-Monsoon Season (April, 2021) has been presented in Table
3.45 through Table 3.48.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 172
Table 3.45: Density, Frequency, Abundance and Shanon Wiener diversity Index (H) of Phytoplankton and zooplankton at M-3 (Pre - Monsoon, April 2021)
S.N. Phyto-planktons and Zoo -planktons Density
(Org/Liter) Frequency (%) Abundance
Diversity
Index
(Shannon Wiener)
Chlorophyta
Ulvaceae
1 Ulvaceae fosciata 06 18 2 0.096
2 Ulvaceae lactuca 2 4 1 0.030
3 Entermorpha compressa 12 24 1 0.143
4 Entermorpha intestinailis 08 22 2 0.098
Cladophoraceae
5 Chetomorpha antennia 12 28 3 0.099
6 Chetomorpha brachygona 12 8 1 0.018
7 Chetomorpha torta 8 4 1 0.006
8 Cladophora socillis 12 28 3 0.099
9 Cladophora utriculosa 13 4 1 0.043
10 Cladophora fasicularis 8 12 2 0.076
11 Cladophora colabense 14 20 3 0.084
12 Spongomorpha indica 5 8 2 0.056
Phaeophyta
13 Ectocarpus mitchellae 17 32 3 0.119
14 Chnoospora minima 6 8 2 0.064
16 Dictyata dichotoma 7 13 1 0.049
15 Padina tertastromatica 17 34 4 0.122
17 Sargassum vulgare 12 28 3 0.099
18 Sargassum ilicifolium 2 4 1 0.030
19 Sargassum polycestum 11 20 9 0.125
20 Sargassum tenerrium 19 22 3 0.096
21 Gifforidia indica 23 34 4 0.141
Rhodophyta
22 Porphyra vietnamensis 4 8 2 0.049
23 Bangiopsis subsimplex 16 20 3 0.084
24 Geldiopsis variabilis 2 4 1 0.030
25 Geldium pusillum 12 8 1 0.058
26 Petrocladia hetroplatos 05 14 1 0.143
27 Amphiroa fragilissima 12 8 1 0.048
28 Grateloupia lithophila 5 12 2 0.05
29 Grateloupia filicina 5 12 2 0.059
30 Gracilania corticata 8 20 2 0.076
31 Gracilania textori 23 34 4 0.141
32 Gracilania edulis 13 24 1 0.143
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 173
S.N. Phyto-planktons and Zoo -planktons Density
(Org/Liter) Frequency (%) Abundance
Diversity
Index
(Shannon Wiener)
33 Hyprea valentiae 5 8 2 0.056
34 Hyprea musciformis 14 28 2 0.176
35 Gigartima acicularis 12 8 1 0.018
36 Liagora erecta 2 4 1 0.030
37 Centrocelos clavulatum 13 4 1 0.043
38 Bryocladia thuraitesis 5 13 3 0.082
39 Wrangelia argus 22 38 3 0.296
40 Bryopis pennata 8 12 2 0.076
Chlorophyceae
41 Closterium dianae 5 12 2 0.059
42 Coelastrummicroporum 8 12 2 0.076
43 Pediastrum duplex 14 20 3 0.084
44 Pediastrum simplex 12 8 1 0.048
45 Peridiniuminconspicum 19 22 3 0.096
Total 451 3.58
Zooplanktons
46 Copepod 5 8 2 0.056
47 Decapods 4 6 9 0.025
48 pteropod 18 12 10 0.129
49 lamillibranchs 5 4 8 0.063
50 Gastropods 15 23 4 0.127
51 Lucifer spp 22 26 5 0.156
52 Fish eggs 12 10 5 0.148
53 Phoronids 5 13 3 0.182
54 Eumuliercula casta (Oligocheates) 13 20 11 0.228
55 Asterigerina (Foraminifera) 17 20 5 0.121
56 Collotheca pelagica (rotifier) 11 20 9 0.205
57 Medusea 6 18 7 0.176
58 Siphanophore 7 13 7 0.171
59 Appendicularia 4 12 4 0.190
60 Phoronids 13 4 1 0.143
Total 157
2.12
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 174
Table 3.46: Density, Frequency, Abundance and Shanon Wiener diversity Index (H) of Phytoplankton and Zooplanktons at M-4 (Pre-Monsoon, April 2021)
S.N. Phyto-planktons Density
(Org/Liter) Frequency (%) Abundance
Diversity
Index
(Shannon Wiener)
Chlorophyta
Ulvaceae
1 Ulvaceae fosciata 10 14 3 0.098
2 Ulvaceae lactuca 5 8 1 0.050
3 Entermorpha compressa 11 12 2 0.165
4 Entermorpha intestinailis 3 8 1 0.0221
Cladophoraceae
5 Chetomorpha antennia 10 13 2 0.074
6 Chetomorpha brachygona 2 8 1 0.018
7 Chetomorpha torta 18 24 1 0.116
8 Cladophora socillis 6 16 2 0.078
9 Cladophora utriculosa 12 16 3 0.105
10 Cladophora fasicularis 14 25 1 0.158
11 Cladophora colabense 10 24 3 0.098
12 Spongomorpha indica 18 32 2 0.174
Phaeophyta
13 Ectocarpus mitchellae 17 32 3 0.119
14 Chnoospora minima 6 8 2 0.064
16 Dictyata dichotoma 7 13 1 0.049
15 Padina tertastromatica 17 34 4 0.122
17 Sargassum vulgare 12 28 3 0.099
18 Sargassum ilicifolium 20 32 4 0.127
19 Sargassum polycestum 17 20 5 0.156
20 Sargassum tenerrium 15 25 5 0.148
21 Gifforidia indica 12 24 4 0.141
Rhodophyta
22 Porphyra vietnamensis 4 8 2 0.049
23 Bangiopsis subsimplex 16 20 3 0.084
24 Geldiopsis variabilis 2 4 1 0.030
25 Geldium pusillum 3 4 1 0.043
26 Petrocladia hetroplatos 11 4 4 0.011
27 Amphiroa fragilissima 27 32 6 0.165
28 Grateloupia lithophila 5 12 2 0.059
29 Grateloupia filicina 8 12 2 0.076
30 Gracilania corticata 27 32 6 0.165
31 Gracilania textori 22 18 8 0.154
32 Gracilania edulis 19 22 3 0.096
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 175
S.N. Phyto-planktons Density
(Org/Liter) Frequency (%) Abundance
Diversity
Index
(Shannon Wiener)
33 Hyprea valentiae 5 8 2 0.056
34 Hyprea musciformis 10 13 2 0.074
35 Gigartima acicularis 16 20 3 0.084
36 Liagora erecta 12 4 1 0.030
37 Centrocelos clavulatum 3 4 1 0.043
38 Bryocladia thuraitesis 1 4 4 0.011
39 Wrangelia argus 27 32 6 0.165
40 Bryopis pennata 8 12 2 0.076
Chlorophyceae
41 Closterium dianae 5 12 2 0.059
42 Coelastrummicroporum 8 20 2 0.076
43 Pediastrum duplex 15 15 2 0.08 9
44 Pediastrum simplex 8 18 2 0.076
45 Peridiniuminconspicum 10 12 3 0.096
Total 552 3.97
Zooplanktons
46 Copepod 07 15 2 0.156
47 Decapods 18 34 9 0.207
48 pteropod 08 20 3 0.080
49 lamillibranchs 8 4 1 0.006
50 Gastropods 10 13 2 0.124
51 Lucifer spp 16 8 2 0.104
52 Fish eggs 13 24 1 0.103
53 Phoronids 15 23 10 0.152
54 Eumuliercula casta (Oligocheates) 13 22 10 0.0952
55 Asterigerina (Foraminifera) 6 21 7 0.332
56 Collotheca pelagica (rotifier) 17 19 5 0.088
57 Medusea 11 20 9 0.070
58 Siphanophore 08 23 18 0.140
59 Appendicularia 10 18 19 0.134
60 Phoronids 13 30 10 0.152
Total 183
2.8
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 176
Table 3.47: Density, Frequency, Abundance and Shanon Wiener diversity Index (H) of Phytoplankton and Zooplanktons at M-5 (Pre-Monsoon, April 2021)
S.N. Phyto-planktons and
zoo- planktons
Density
(Org/Liter) Frequency (%) Abundance
Diversity
Index
(Shannon Wiener)
Chlorophyta
Ulvaceae
1 Ulvaceae fosciata 05 16 2 0.078
2 Ulvaceae lactuca 17 34 2 0.059
3 Entermorpha compressa 18 12 2 0.076
4 Entermorpha intestinailis 06 22 1 0.022
Cladophoraceae
5 Chetomorpha antennia 10 13 2 0.074
6 Chetomorpha brachygona 12 8 1 0.088
7 Chetomorpha torta 8 4 1 0.006
8 Cladophora socillis 6 16 2 0.078
9 Cladophora utriculosa 12 16 3 0.105
10 Cladophora fasicularis 20 32 1 0.058
11 Cladophora colabense 10 24 3 0.098
12 Spongomorpha indica 10 28 2 0.074
Phaeophyta
13 Ectocarpus mitchellae 17 32 3 0.119
14 Chnoospora minima 6 8 2 0.064
16 Dictyata dichotoma 17 13 1 0.089
15 Padina tertastromatica 11 24 4 0.092
17 Sargassum vulgare 12 28 3 0.099
18 Sargassum ilicifolium 20 32 4 0.127
19 Sargassum polycestum 27 34 5 0.156
20 Sargassum tenerrium 23 30 5 0.148
21 Gifforidia indica 7 13 1 0.049
Rhodophyta
22 Porphyra vietnamensis 5 8 2 0.056
23 Bangiopsis subsimplex 11 24 4 0.192
24 Geldiopsis variabilis 08 22 1 0.030
25 Geldium pusillum 10 24 1 0.043
26 Petrocladia hetroplatos 11 4 4 0.011
27 Amphiroa fragilissima 8 12 2 0.076
28 Grateloupia lithophila 5 18 2 0.051
29 Grateloupia filicina 8 12 2 0.076
30 Gracilania corticata 8 20 2 0.076
31 Gracilania textori 16 20 3 0.084
32 Gracilania edulis 13 28 3 0.096
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 177
S.N. Phyto-planktons and
zoo- planktons
Density
(Org/Liter) Frequency (%) Abundance
Diversity
Index
(Shannon Wiener)
33 Hyprea valentiae 15 8 2 0.056
34 Hyprea musciformis 3 4 1 0.043
35 Gigartima acicularis 16 20 3 0.184
36 Liagora erecta 2 4 1 0.030
37 Centrocelos clavulatum 13 4 1 0.043
38 Bryocladia thuraitesis 11 4 4 0.011
39 Wrangelia argus 5 8 2 0.056
40 Bryopis pennata 8 12 2 0.076
Chlorophyceae
41 Closterium dianae 15 12 2 0.139
42 Coelastrummicroporum 8 12 2 0.046
43 Pediastrum duplex 16 20 3 0.084
44 Pediastrum simplex 19 22 3 0.196
45 Peridiniuminconspicum 11 24 4 0.092
Total 519 3.68
Zooplanktons
46 Copepod 5 8 2 0.056
47 Decapods 16 16 2 0.178
48 pteropod 5 12 2 0.059
49 lamillibranchs 8 12 2 0.076
50 Gastropods 15 34 5 0.156
51 Lucifer spp 3 14 1 0.043
52 Fish eggs 15 12 4 0.111
53 Phoronids 04 18 1 0.030
54 Eumuliercula casta (Oligocheates) 14 17 1 0.106
55 Asterigerina (Foraminifera) 6 20 2 0.028
56 Collotheca pelagica (rotifier) 12 16 3 0.040
57 Medusea 8 17 1 0.006
58 Siphanophore 10 13 2 0.074
59 Appendicularia 12 26 2 0.164
60 Phoronids 08 20 1 0.043
Total 141
1.24
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 178
Table 3.48: Density, Frequency, Abundance and Shanon Wiener diversity Index (H) of Phytoplankton and Zooplanktons at M-6 (Pre-Monsoon, April 2021)
S.N. Phyto-planktons and
Zoo -planktons
Density
(Org/Liter) Frequency (%) Abundance
Diversity
Index
(Shannon Wiener)
Chlorophyta
Ulvaceae
1 Ulvaceae fosciata 6 8 2 0.064
2 Ulvaceae lactuca 11 20 1 0.050
3 Entermorpha compressa 08 16 3 0.099
4 Entermorpha intestinailis 6 16 2 0.078
Cladophoraceae
5 Chetomorpha antennia 10 13 2 0.074
6 Chetomorpha brachygona 12 8 1 0.118
7 Chetomorpha torta 8 4 1 0.006
8 Cladophora socillis 15 16 2 0.178
9 Cladophora utriculosa 12 16 3 0.105
10 Cladophora fasicularis 20 10 1 0.158
11 Cladophora colabense 06 24 3 0.098
12 Spongomorpha indica 10 13 2 0.074
Phaeophyta
13 Ectocarpus mitchellae 17 32 3 0.119
14 Chnoospora minima 6 8 2 0.064
16 Dictyata dichotoma 13 13 1 0.049
15 Padina tertastromatica 17 34 4 0.122
17 Sargassum vulgare 12 28 3 0.099
18 Sargassum ilicifolium 20 32 4 0.227
19 Sargassum polycestum 15 34 5 0.156
20 Sargassum tenerrium 23 30 5 0.248
21 Gifforidia indica 6 8 2 0.064
Rhodophyta
22 Porphyra vietnamensis 06 12 2 0.049
23 Bangiopsis subsimplex 12 18 3 0.084
24 Geldiopsis variabilis 18 24 1 0.030
25 Geldium pusillum 06 08 1 0.043
26 Petrocladia hetroplatos 16 24 4 0.011
27 Amphiroa fragilissima 14 32 6 0.165
28 Grateloupia lithophila 5 12 2 0.059
29 Grateloupia filicina 18 12 2 0.076
30 Gracilania corticata 20 24 6 0.145
31 Gracilania textori 25 30 8 0.264
32 Gracilania edulis 19 22 3 0.096
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 179
S.N. Phyto-planktons and
Zoo -planktons
Density
(Org/Liter) Frequency (%) Abundance
Diversity
Index
(Shannon Wiener)
33 Hyprea valentiae 21 28 2 0.056
34 Hyprea musciformis 20 22 9 0.197
35 Gigartima acicularis 16 20 3 0.084
36 Liagora erecta 8 4 1 0.030
37 Centrocelos clavulatum 14 4 1 0.043
38 Bryocladia thuraitesis 12 28 2 0.076
39 Wrangelia argus 16 20 3 0.084
40 Bryopis pennata 8 12 2 0.076
Chlorophyceae
41 Closterium dianae 15 12 2 0.05
42 Coelastrummicroporum 8 12 2 0.076
43 Pediastrum duplex 25 30 8 0.264
44 Pediastrum simplex 5 8 2 0.056
45 Peridiniuminconspicum 19 22 3 0.096
Total 599 4.5
Zooplanktons
46 Copepod 5 15 2 0.056
47 Decapods 22 38 9 0.020
48 pteropod 10 4 4 0.012
49 lamillibranchs 13 28 1 0.022
50 Gastropods 8 12 2 0.076
51 Lucifer spp 03 08 2 0.059
52 Fish eggs 7 13 1 0.049
53 Phoronids 17 28 2 0.074
54 Eumuliercula casta (Oligocheates) 12 8 1 0.018
55 Asterigerina (Foraminifera) 18 23 1 0.006
56 Collotheca pelagica (rotifier) 03 16 2 0.078
57 Medusea 12 16 3 0.105
58 Siphanophore 08 20 3 0.084
59 Appendicularia 16 24 3 0.098
60 Phoronids 22 18 1 0.030
Total 176
0.775
In total, 60 species from 33 genera and 3 main phytoplankton groups were identified.
The average of data of frequency, density, abundance and diversity index (Shannon Wiener) of benthic
organisms at different locations for (Pre-Monsoon, April 2021) has been presented in Table 3.49
through Table 3.52.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 180
Table 3.49: Average of data of Frequency, Density, Abundance and Shanon Wiener Diversity Index (H) of Benthic Organisms at M-3 (Pre-Monsoon, April 2021)
S.N Benthic Organisms Density
(ind.m-2) Frequency (%) Abundance Diversity Index (Shannon Wiener)
1 Euniphysa 14 45 12 0.245
2 Namalycastis 3 13 4 0.103
3 Nephtys 15 25 6 0.143
4 Magelona 17 28 12 0.250
5 Aryandes 6 15 4 0.107
6 Sabellidae 4 12 3 0.283
7 Millepora 14 29 11 0.241
8 Adelopora 16 39 20 0.315
9 Cyclohelia 29 35 21 0.207
10 Errina 24 32 19 0.216
Total 124 1.834
Table 3.50: Average of data of Frequency, Density, Abundance and Shanon Wiener Diversity Index (H)
of Benthic Organisms at M-4 (Pre-Monsoon, April 2021)
S.N Benthic Organisms Density
(ind.m-2)
Frequency
(%) Abundance
Diversity Index
(Shannon Wiener)
1 Euniphysa 15 29 6 0.170
2 Namalycastis 16 22 9 0.118
3 Nephtys 12 31 9 0.181
4 Magelona 6 15 4 0.107
5 Aryandes 14 36 12 0.245
6 Sabellidae 17 18 5 0.193
7 Millepora 9 22 9 0.118
8 Adelopora 14 28 11 0.193
9 Cyclohelia 17 35 14 0.267
10 Errina 9 22 7 0.159
Total 104 1.65
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 181
Table 3.51: Average of data of Frequency, Density, Abundance and Shanon Wiener Diversity Index (H) of Benthic Organisms at M-5 (Pre-Monsoon, April 2021)
S.N Benthic Organisms Density
(ind.m-2)
Frequency
(%) Abundance
Diversity Index
(Shannon Wiener)
1 Euniphysa 5 25 5 0.131
2 Namalycastis 17 10 13 0.217
3 Nephtys 20 33 17 0.309
4 Magelona 11 40 9 0.213
5 Aryandes 15 10 12 0.200
6 Sabellidae 23 22 7 0.107
7 Millepora 18 32 7 0.111
8 Adelopora 15 33 4 0.290
9 Cyclohelia 21 9 20 0.286
10 Errina 7 12 8 0.213
Total 113 1.87
Table 3.52: Average of data of Frequency, Density, Abundance and Shanon Wiener Diversity Index (H)
of Benthic Organisms at M-6 (Pre-Monsoon, April 2021)
S.N Benthic Organisms Density
(ind.m-2)
Frequency
(%) Abundance Diversity Index (Shannon Wiener)
1 Euniphysa 10 13 4 0.213
2 Namalycastis 16 11 4 0.155
3 Nephtys 18 40 15 0.201
4 Magelona 21 9 20 0.256
5 Aryandes 2 4 2 0.169
6 Sabellidae 14 31 13 0.213
7 Millepora 25 50 18 0.301
8 Adelopora 10 25 7 0.152
9 Cyclohelia 18 22 15 0.211
10 Errina 16 18 5 0.293
Total 105 1.789
The data on frequency, density, abundance and diversity index (Shannon Wiener) of phytoplankton and
Zooplankton at different locations for Monsoon Season (September, 2021) has been presented in Table
3.53 through Table 3.56.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 182
Table 3.53: Density, Frequency, Abundance and Shanon Wiener diversity Index (H) of Phytoplankton and Zooplanktons at M-3 (Monsoon, September 2021)
S.N. Phyto-planktons Density
(Org/Liter) Frequency (%) Abundance
Diversity Index
(Shannon Wiener) Chlorophyta
Ulvaceae
1 Ulvaceae fosciata 8 12 2 0.076
2 Ulvaceae lactuca 5 8 1 0.050
3 Entermorpha compressa 8 4 1 0.006
4 Entermorpha intestinailis 6 16 2 0.078
Cladophoraceae
5 Chetomorpha antennia 10 13 2 0.074
6 Chetomorpha brachygona 12 8 1 0.018
7 Chetomorpha torta 8 4 1 0.006
8 Cladophora socillis 6 16 2 0.078
9 Cladophora utriculosa 3 4 1 0.043
10 Cladophora fasicularis 8 12 2 0.076
11 Cladophora colabense 3 4 1 0.043
12 Spongomorpha indica 5 8 2 0.056
Phaeophyta
13 Ectocarpus mitchellae 17 32 3 0.119
14 Chnoospora minima 6 8 2 0.064
16 Dictyata dichotoma 7 13 1 0.049
15 Padina tertastromatica 17 34 4 0.122
17 Sargassum vulgare 12 28 3 0.099
18 Sargassum ilicifolium 20 32 4 0.127
19 Sargassum polycestum 14 20 3 0.084
20 Sargassum tenerrium 19 22 3 0.096
21 Gifforidia indica 23 34 4 0.141
Rhodophyta
22 Porphyra vietnamensis 4 8 2 0.049
23 Bangiopsis subsimplex 16 20 3 0.084
24 Geldiopsis variabilis 2 4 1 0.030
25 Geldium pusillum 3 4 1 0.043
26 Petrocladia hetroplatos - - - -
27 Amphiroa fragilissima 5 8 2 0.056
28 Grateloupia lithophila 5 12 2 0.05
29 Grateloupia filicina 8 12 2 0.076
30 Gracilania corticata 8 12 2 0.076
31 Gracilania textori 2 4 1 0.030
32 Gracilania edulis 3 4 1 0.043
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 183
S.N. Phyto-planktons Density
(Org/Liter) Frequency (%) Abundance
Diversity Index
(Shannon Wiener) 33 Hyprea valentiae 5 8 2 0.056
34 Hyprea musciformis 8 12 2 0.076
35 Gigartima acicularis 12 8 1 0.018
36 Liagora erecta 2 4 1 0.030
37 Centrocelos clavulatum 3 4 1 0.043
38 Bryocladia thuraitesis - - - -
39 Wrangelia argus 19 22 3 0.096
40 Bryopis pennata 8 12 2 0.076
Chlorophyceae
41 Closterium dianae 5 12 2 0.059
42 Coelastrummicroporum 8 12 2 0.076
43 Pediastrum duplex 14 20 3 0.084
44 Pediastrum simplex 12 8 1 0.018
45 Peridiniuminconspicum 19 22 3 0.096
Total 388 2.651
Zooplanktons
46 Copepod 5 8 2 0.056
47 Decapods 4 6 9 0.0205
48 pteropod 8 12 10 0.0290
49 lamillibranchs 5 4 8 0.0234
50 Gastropods 15 23 4 0.127
51 Lucifer spp 22 26 5 0.156
52 Fish eggs 12 10 5 0.148
53 Phoronids 5 13 3 0.082
54 Eumuliercula casta (Oligocheates) 13 20 11 0.228
55 Asterigerina (Foraminifera) 7 20 5 0.121
56 Collotheca pelagica (rotifier) 11 20 9 0.205
57 Medusea 6 18 7 0.076
58 Siphanophore 7 13 7 0.071
59 Appendicularia 4 12 4 0.090
60 Phoronids 3 4 1 0.043
Total 127
1.47
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 184
Table 3.54: Density, Frequency, Abundance and Shanon Wiener diversity Index (H) of Phytoplankton and Zooplanktons at M-4 (Monsoon, September 2021)
S.N. Phyto-planktons Density
(Org/Liter) Frequency (%) Abundance
Diversity
Index
(Shannon Wiener)
Chlorophyta
Ulvaceae
1 Ulvaceae fosciata 10 14 3 0.098
2 Ulvaceae lactuca 5 8 1 0.050
3 Entermorpha compressa 11 12 2 0.065
4 Entermorpha intestinailis 3 8 1 0.0221
Cladophoraceae
5 Chetomorpha antennia 10 13 2 0.074
6 Chetomorpha brachygona 12 8 1 0.018
7 Chetomorpha torta 8 4 1 0.006
8 Cladophora socillis 6 16 2 0.078
9 Cladophora utriculosa 12 16 3 0.105
10 Cladophora fasicularis 12 10 1 0.058
11 Cladophora colabense 10 24 3 0.098
12 Spongomorpha indica 10 13 2 0.074
Phaeophyta
13 Ectocarpus mitchellae 17 32 3 0.119
14 Chnoospora minima 6 8 2 0.064
16 Dictyata dichotoma 7 13 1 0.049
15 Padina tertastromatica 17 34 4 0.122
17 Sargassum vulgare 12 28 3 0.099
18 Sargassum ilicifolium 20 32 4 0.127
19 Sargassum polycestum 17 20 5 0.156
20 Sargassum tenerrium 15 25 5 0.148
21 Gifforidia indica 12 24 4 0.141
Rhodophyta
22 Porphyra vietnamensis 4 8 2 0.049
23 Bangiopsis subsimplex 16 20 3 0.084
24 Geldiopsis variabilis 2 4 1 0.030
25 Geldium pusillum 3 4 1 0.043
26 Petrocladia hetroplatos 1 4 4 0.011
27 Amphiroa fragilissima 27 32 6 0.165
28 Grateloupia lithophila 5 12 2 0.059
29 Grateloupia filicina 8 12 2 0.076
30 Gracilania corticata 27 32 6 0.165
31 Gracilania textori 22 18 8 0.154
32 Gracilania edulis 19 22 3 0.096
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 185
S.N. Phyto-planktons Density
(Org/Liter) Frequency (%) Abundance
Diversity
Index
(Shannon Wiener)
33 Hyprea valentiae 5 8 2 0.056
34 Hyprea musciformis 10 13 2 0.074
35 Gigartima acicularis 16 20 3 0.084
36 Liagora erecta 2 4 1 0.030
37 Centrocelos clavulatum 3 4 1 0.043
38 Bryocladia thuraitesis 1 4 4 0.011
39 Wrangelia argus 27 32 6 0.165
40 Bryopis pennata 8 12 2 0.076
Chlorophyceae
41 Closterium dianae 5 12 2 0.059
42 Coelastrummicroporum 8 20 2 0.076
43 Pediastrum duplex 5 15 2 0.059
44 Pediastrum simplex 8 18 2 0.076
45 Peridiniuminconspicum 10 12 3 0.096
Total 474 3.467
Zooplanktons
46 Copepod 5 8 2 0.056
47 Decapods 20 30 9 0.207
48 pteropod 12 16 3 0.080
49 lamillibranchs 8 4 1 0.006
50 Gastropods 10 13 2 0.074
51 Lucifer spp 6 8 2 0.064
52 Fish eggs 3 4 1 0.043
53 Phoronids 13 23 10 0.152
54 Eumuliercula casta (Oligocheates) 13 23 10 0.0952
55 Asterigerina (Foraminifera) 6 21 7 0.332
56 Collotheca pelagica (rotifier) 7 19 5 0.088
57 Medusea 11 20 9 0.070
58 Siphanophore 21 14 18 0.140
59 Appendicularia 20 23 19 0.134
60 Phoronids 13 23 10 0.152
Total 168
1.693
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 186
Table 3.55: Density, Frequency, Abundance and Shanon Wiener diversity Index (H) of Phytoplankton and Zooplanktons at M-5 (Monsoon, September 2021)
S.N. Phyto-planktons and
zoo- planktons
Density
(Org/Liter) Frequency (%) Abundance
Diversity
Index
(Shannon Wiener)
Chlorophyta
Ulvaceae
1 Ulvaceae fosciata 6 16 2 0.078
2 Ulvaceae lactuca 5 12 2 0.059
3 Entermorpha compressa 8 12 2 0.076
4 Entermorpha intestinailis 3 8 1 0.022
Cladophoraceae
5 Chetomorpha antennia 10 13 2 0.074
6 Chetomorpha brachygona 12 8 1 0.018
7 Chetomorpha torta 8 4 1 0.006
8 Cladophora socillis 6 16 2 0.078
9 Cladophora utriculosa 12 16 3 0.105
10 Cladophora fasicularis 12 10 1 0.058
11 Cladophora colabense 10 24 3 0.098
12 Spongomorpha indica 10 13 2 0.074
Phaeophyta
13 Ectocarpus mitchellae 17 32 3 0.119
14 Chnoospora minima 6 8 2 0.064
16 Dictyata dichotoma 7 13 1 0.049
15 Padina tertastromatica 11 24 4 0.092
17 Sargassum vulgare 12 28 3 0.099
18 Sargassum ilicifolium 20 32 4 0.127
19 Sargassum polycestum 27 34 5 0.156
20 Sargassum tenerrium 23 30 5 0.148
21 Gifforidia indica 7 13 1 0.049
Rhodophyta
22 Porphyra vietnamensis 5 8 2 0.056
23 Bangiopsis subsimplex 11 24 4 0.092
24 Geldiopsis variabilis 2 4 1 0.030
25 Geldium pusillum 3 4 1 0.043
26 Petrocladia hetroplatos 1 4 4 0.011
27 Amphiroa fragilissima 8 12 2 0.076
28 Grateloupia lithophila 5 12 2 0.051
29 Grateloupia filicina 8 12 2 0.076
30 Gracilania corticata 8 12 2 0.076
31 Gracilania textori 16 20 3 0.084
32 Gracilania edulis 19 22 3 0.096
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 187
S.N. Phyto-planktons and
zoo- planktons
Density
(Org/Liter) Frequency (%) Abundance
Diversity
Index
(Shannon Wiener)
33 Hyprea valentiae 5 8 2 0.056
34 Hyprea musciformis 3 4 1 0.043
35 Gigartima acicularis 16 20 3 0.084
36 Liagora erecta 2 4 1 0.030
37 Centrocelos clavulatum 3 4 1 0.043
38 Bryocladia thuraitesis 1 4 4 0.011
39 Wrangelia argus 5 8 2 0.056
40 Bryopis pennata 8 12 2 0.076
Chlorophyceae
41 Closterium dianae 5 12 2 0.039
42 Coelastrummicroporum 8 12 2 0.046
43 Pediastrum duplex 16 20 3 0.084
44 Pediastrum simplex 19 22 3 0.096
45 Peridiniuminconspicum 11 24 4 0.092
Total 420 2.939
Zooplanktons
46 Copepod 5 8 2 0.056
47 Decapods 6 16 2 0.078
48 pteropod 5 12 2 0.059
49 lamillibranchs 8 12 2 0.076
50 Gastropods 2 4 1 0.030
51 Lucifer spp 3 4 1 0.043
52 Fish eggs 1 4 4 0.011
53 Phoronids 2 4 1 0.030
54 Eumuliercula casta (Oligocheates) 8 4 1 0.006
55 Asterigerina (Foraminifera) 6 8 2 0.028
56 Collotheca pelagica (rotifier) 12 16 3 0.040
57 Medusea 8 4 1 0.006
58 Siphanophore 10 13 2 0.074
59 Appendicularia 6 8 2 0.064
60 Phoronids 3 4 1 0.043
Total 85
0.908
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 188
Table 3.56: Density, Frequency, Abundance and Shanon Wiener diversity Index (H) of Phytoplankton and Zooplanktons at M-6 (Monsoon, September 2021)
S.N. Phyto-planktons and
Zoo -planktons
Density
(Org/Liter) Frequency (%) Abundance
Diversity
Index
(Shannon Wiener)
Chlorophyta
Ulvaceae
1 Ulvaceae fosciata 6 8 2 0.064
2 Ulvaceae lactuca 5 8 1 0.050
3 Entermorpha compressa 12 28 3 0.099
4 Entermorpha intestinailis 6 16 2 0.078
Cladophoraceae
5 Chetomorpha antennia 10 13 2 0.074
6 Chetomorpha brachygona 12 8 1 0.018
7 Chetomorpha torta 8 4 1 0.006
8 Cladophora socillis 6 16 2 0.078
9 Cladophora utriculosa 12 16 3 0.105
10 Cladophora fasicularis 12 10 1 0.058
11 Cladophora colabense 10 24 3 0.098
12 Spongomorpha indica 10 13 2 0.074
Phaeophyta
13 Ectocarpus mitchellae 17 32 3 0.119
14 Chnoospora minima 6 8 2 0.064
16 Dictyata dichotoma 7 13 1 0.049
15 Padina tertastromatica 17 34 4 0.122
17 Sargassum vulgare 12 28 3 0.099
18 Sargassum ilicifolium 20 32 4 0.127
19 Sargassum polycestum 27 34 5 0.156
20 Sargassum tenerrium 23 30 5 0.148
21 Gifforidia indica 6 8 2 0.064
Rhodophyta
22 Porphyra vietnamensis 4 8 2 0.049
23 Bangiopsis subsimplex 16 20 3 0.084
24 Geldiopsis variabilis 2 4 1 0.030
25 Geldium pusillum 3 4 1 0.043
26 Petrocladia hetroplatos 1 4 4 0.011
27 Amphiroa fragilissima 27 32 6 0.165
28 Grateloupia lithophila 5 12 2 0.059
29 Grateloupia filicina 8 12 2 0.076
30 Gracilania corticata 20 24 6 0.145
31 Gracilania textori 25 30 8 0.164
32 Gracilania edulis 19 22 3 0.096
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 189
S.N. Phyto-planktons and
Zoo -planktons
Density
(Org/Liter) Frequency (%) Abundance
Diversity
Index
(Shannon Wiener)
33 Hyprea valentiae 5 8 2 0.056
34 Hyprea musciformis 20 22 9 0.107
35 Gigartima acicularis 16 20 3 0.084
36 Liagora erecta 2 4 1 0.030
37 Centrocelos clavulatum 3 4 1 0.043
38 Bryocladia thuraitesis 8 12 2 0.076
39 Wrangelia argus 16 20 3 0.084
40 Bryopis pennata 8 12 2 0.076
Chlorophyceae
41 Closterium dianae 5 12 2 0.05
42 Coelastrummicroporum 8 12 2 0.076
43 Pediastrum duplex 25 30 8 0.164
44 Pediastrum simplex 5 8 2 0.056
45 Peridiniuminconspicum 19 22 3 0.096
Total 486 3.532
Zooplanktons
46 Copepod 5 8 2 0.056
47 Decapods 6 8 9 0.020
48 pteropod 7 4 4 0.012
49 lamillibranchs 3 8 1 0.022
50 Gastropods 8 12 2 0.076
51 Lucifer spp 5 12 2 0.059
52 Fish eggs 7 13 1 0.049
53 Phoronids 10 24 3 0.098
54 Eumuliercula casta (Oligocheates) 6 8 2 0.064
55 Asterigerina (Foraminifera) 20 24 6 0.145
56 Collotheca pelagica (rotifier) 5 12 2 0.059
57 Medusea 8 12 2 0.076
58 Siphanophore 16 20 3 0.084
59 Appendicularia 10 24 3 0.098
60 Phoronids 2 4 1 0.030
Total 118
0.948
The average of data of frequency, density, abundance and diversity index (Shannon Wiener) of Benthic
organisms at different locations for Post-Monsoon season has been presented in Table 3.57 to Table
3.60.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 190
Table 3.57: Average of data of Frequency, Density, Abundance and Shanon Wiener Diversity Index (H) of Benthic Organisms at M-3 (Monsoon, September 2021)
S.N Benthic Organisms Density
(ind.m-2) Frequency (%) Abundance Diversity Index (Shannon Wiener)
1 Euniphysa 22 45 15 0.301
2 Namalycastis 8 15 4 0.103
3 Nephtys 10 24 6 0.143
4 Magelona 14 32 12 0.220
5 Aryandes 8 15 4 0.103
6 Sabellidae 4 12 3 0.083
7 Millepora 14 32 12 0.241
8 Adelopora 22 45 20 0.315
9 Cyclohelia 20 36 21 0.297
10 Errina 25 42 19 0.326
Total 147 2.13
Table 3.58: Average of data of Frequency, Density, Abundance and Shanon Wiener Diversity Index (H)
of Benthic Organisms at M-4 (Monsoon, September 2021)
S.N Benthic Organisms Density
(ind.m-2)
Frequency
(%) Abundance
Diversity Index
(Shannon Wiener)
1 Euniphysa 17 48 14 0.297
2 Namalycastis 9 22 9 0.118
3 Nephtys 14 40 11 0.253
4 Magelona 6 15 4 0.157
5 Aryandes 14 45 12 0.245
6 Sabellidae 7 18 5 0.093
7 Millepora 9 22 9 0.118
8 Adelopora 14 40 11 0.253
9 Cyclohelia 17 48 14 0.297
10 Errina 9 27 7 0.159
Total 116 1.99
Table 3.59: Average of data of Frequency, Density, Abundance and Shanon Wiener Diversity Index (H)
of Benthic Organisms at M-5 (Monsoon, September 2021)
S.N Benthic Organisms Density
(ind.m-2)
Frequency
(%) Abundance
Diversity Index
(Shannon Wiener)
1 Euniphysa 6 26 5 0.131
2 Namalycastis 15 34 14 0.297
3 Nephtys 20 33 17 0.309
4 Magelona 11 40 9 0.213
5 Aryandes 15 0 12 0.200
6 Sabellidae 6 38 7 0.107
7 Millepora 17 48 14 0.297
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 191
S.N Benthic Organisms Density
(ind.m-2)
Frequency
(%) Abundance
Diversity Index
(Shannon Wiener)
8 Adelopora 11 40 9 0.213
9 Cyclohelia 21 9 20 0.286
10 Errina 7 34 8 0.213
Total 129 2.26
Table 3.60: Average of data of Frequency, Density, Abundance and Shanon Wiener Diversity Index (H)
of Benthic Organisms at M-6 (Monsoon, September 2021)
S.N Benthic Organisms Density
(ind.m-2)
Frequency
(%) Abundance Diversity Index (Shannon Wiener)
1 Euniphysa 14 31 13 0.213
2 Namalycastis 5 11 4 0.155
3 Nephtys 18 40 15 0.271
4 Magelona 13 27 3 0.121
5 Aryandes 12 24 2 0.169
6 Sabellidae 14 31 13 0.213
7 Millepora 25 50 18 0.301
8 Adelopora 10 25 7 0.152
9 Cyclohelia 18 40 15 0.271
10 Errina 8 20 5 0.123
Total 137 1.989
MARINE WATER
The Marine sampling Location are presented in Table 3.61. The Marine Study Photographs are shown as
Figure 3.27.
Table 3.61: Marine Monitoring Locations
Sr. No. Locations Sampling
Code Direction Dist. (Km)
Coordinates
North East
1. Harbour M1 S 0.6 18°32'23.10"N 84°20'21.07"E
2. Harbour M2 SW 0.65 18°31'57.51"N 84°19'47.69"E
3. Bay of Bengal M3 NE 8.93 18°36'6.99"N 84°25'9.08"E
4. Bay of Bengal M4 SE 8.96 18°30'43.18"N 84°25'7.31"E
5. Bay of Bengal M5 S 7.22 18°28'21.41"N 84°20'41.55"E
6. Bay of Bengal M6 SW 10.08 18°27'25.00"N 84°15'18.17"E
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 192
Figure 3.27: Marine Study Sampling Photographs
The Marine sampling results for three seasons are presented in Table 3.62 through Table 3.64.
Table 3.62: Marine Quality Test reports for Post-Monsoon Season Parameters M-1 M-2 M-3 M-4 M-5 M-6
Temperature 22.8 23.2 22.4 24.2 23.8 24.8
pH 8.16 8.1 8.24 8.18 8.18 8.24
Salinity 34 ppt 33.5 ppt 34 ppt 33.5 ppt 34 ppt 33 ppt
Turbidity 5.2 NTU 5.1 NTU 5.2 NTU 5.2 NTU 5.0 NTU 5.3 NTU
Total Solids 37952 ppm
36541 ppm
36012 ppm
37654 ppm
37925 36965
Total Dissolved Solids 37125
ppm
36200
ppm
35652
ppm
37210
ppm
37241
ppm
36412
ppm
Total Suspended Solids 394 ppm 310 ppm 325 ppm 352 ppm 366 ppm 314 ppm
Silica 0.12 ppm 0.13 ppm 0.13 ppm 0.12 ppm 0.13 ppm 0.12 ppm
Phosphate 0.54 ppm 0.42 ppm 0.63 ppm 0.71 ppm 0.52 ppm 0.83 ppm
Sulphate 2.6 ppm 2.4 ppm 2.8 ppm 2.4 ppm 2.8 ppm 2.2 ppm
Nitrite 0.022 ppm 0.018 ppm 0.028 ppm 0.023 ppm 0.025 ppm 0.021 ppm
Nitrate 2.0 ppm 2.6 ppm 2.2 ppm 2.8 ppm 2.6 ppm 2.0 ppm
Calcium 442 ppm 391 ppm 422 ppm 394 ppm 386 ppm 392 ppm
Magnesium 1222 ppm 1110 ppm 1212 ppm 1014 ppm 1213 ppm 1116 ppm
Sodium 11032 ppm
11433 ppm
11035 ppm
10931 ppm
11843 ppm
10932 ppm
Potassium 410 ppm 425 ppm 410 ppm 421 ppm 415 ppm 403 ppm
Dissolved Oxygen 6.2 ppm 6.4 ppm 5.6 ppm 5.4 ppm 6.3 ppm 6.2 ppm
COD [Chemical Oxygen Demand] 26 ppm 28 ppm 25 ppm 20 ppm 24 ppm 26 ppm
BOD [Biochemical Oxygen
Demand] 1.2 ppm 1.6 ppm 1.2 ppm 1.4 ppm 1.2 ppm 1.8 ppm
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 193
Parameters M-1 M-2 M-3 M-4 M-5 M-6
NH3-N 0.5 ppm 0.7 ppm 0.3 ppm 0.6 ppm 0.4 ppm 0.3 ppm
Phenol 0.01 ppm 0.01 ppm 0.01 ppm 0.01 ppm 0.01 ppm 0.01 ppm
Oil & Grease 2.6 ppm 2.4 ppm 2.8 ppm 2.3 ppm 2.1 ppm 2.3 ppm
SPC [Standard Plate Count] 26 24 22 25 23 27
Bacteriological count [MPN] 32 28 31 34 35 32
Fecal Coliforms 64 62 66 60 62 61
Organic Carbon 1206 ppb 1210 ppb 1208 ppb 1204 ppb 1202 ppb 1204 ppb
Total Organic Matter 126 ppm 121 ppm 122 ppm 126 ppm 123 ppm 121 ppm
Inorganic Phosphates 0.23 ppm 0.23 ppm 0.26 ppm 0.22 ppm 0.24 ppm 0.28 ppm
Table 3.63: Marine Quality Test reports for Pre-Monsoon Season
Parameters M-1 M-2 M-3 M-4 M-5 M-6
Temperature 24 23.4 24.1 23.6 23.1 25
pH 8.2 8.18 8.22 8.26 8.24 8.2
Salinity 33 ppt 34 ppt 34 ppt 33 ppt 33 ppt 34 ppt
Turbidity 4.8 NTU 4.6 NTU 5.0 NTU 5.1 NTU 4.9 NTU 5.0 NTU
Total Solids 36950
ppm
36745
ppm
36925
ppm
37424
ppm
37369
ppm
36914
ppm
Total Dissolved Solids 36425
ppm
36333
ppm
36358
ppm
36980
ppm
36985
ppm
36447
ppm
Total Suspended Solids 374 ppm 306 ppm 330 ppm 341 ppm 365 ppm 320 ppm
Silica 0.14 ppm 0.10 ppm 0.10 ppm 0.14 ppm 0.11 ppm 0.13 ppm
Phosphate 0.50 ppm 0.46 ppm 0.51 ppm 0.48 ppm 0.50 ppm 0.42 ppm
Sulphate 2.2 ppm 2.3 ppm 2.1 ppm 2.2 ppm 2.2 ppm 2.5 ppm
Nitrite 0.018 ppm 0.020 ppm 0.023 ppm 0.020 ppm 0.022 ppm 0.024 ppm
Nitrate 2.0 ppm 2.6 ppm 2.2 ppm 2.8 ppm 2.6 ppm 2.0 ppm
Calcium 415 ppm 398 ppm 410 ppm 388 ppm 408 ppm 410 ppm
Magnesium 1245 ppm 1220 ppm 1198 ppm 1125 ppm 1232 ppm 1158 ppm
Sodium 11122
ppm
11024
ppm
11265
ppm
11481
ppm
11635
ppm
12154
ppm
Potassium 440 ppm 405 ppm 419 ppm 426 ppm 420 ppm 413 ppm
Dissolved Oxygen 5.6 ppm 5.4 ppm 5.8 ppm 5.4 ppm 5.2 ppm 5.3 ppm
COD [Chemical Oxygen Demand] 18 ppm 20 ppm 22 ppm 15 ppm 10 ppm 16 ppm
BOD [Biochemical Oxygen
Demand] 1.0 ppm 1.2 ppm 1.4 ppm 1.2 ppm 1.0 ppm 1.6 ppm
NH3-N 0.6 ppm 0.5 ppm 0.4 ppm 0.3 ppm 0.5 ppm 0.4 ppm
Phenol 0.01 ppm 0.01 ppm 0.01 ppm 0.01 ppm 0.01 ppm 0.01 ppm
Oil & Grease 2.0 ppm 2.0 ppm 2.2 ppm 2.5 ppm 2.2 ppm 2.0 ppm
SPC [Standard Plate Count] 22 20 26 20 22 24
Bacteriological count [MPN] 30 32 25 30 29 27
Fecal Coliforms 44 56 62 54 50 58
Organic Carbon 1012 ppb 1126 ppb 1301 ppb 1254 ppb 1233 ppb 1215 ppb
Total Organic Matter 105 ppm 130 ppm 141 ppm 132 ppm 150 ppm 106 ppm
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 194
Parameters M-1 M-2 M-3 M-4 M-5 M-6
Inorganic Phosphates 0.16 ppm 0.20 ppm 0.22 ppm 0.26 ppm 0.18 ppm 0.22 ppm
Table 3.64: Marine Quality Test reports for Monsoon Season
Parameters M-1 M-2 M-3 M-4 M-5 M-6
Physical Characteristics
Temperature 22.3 22.6 23.2 23.5 23.6 24.2
pH 8.12 8.21 8.18 8.24 8.09 8.15
Salinity 33.6 ppt 33.2 ppt 34.2 ppt 33.8 ppt 33.7 ppt 34 ppt
Turbidity 4.8 NTU 4.2 NTU 4.8 NTU 5.0 NTU 5.3 NTU 4.7 NTU
Total Solids 37547 ppm
36874 ppm
36654 ppm
37323 ppm
37524 ppm
37001 ppm
Total Dissolved Solids 36987 ppm
36543 ppm
36154 ppm
36974 ppm
37021 ppm
36692 ppm
Total Suspended Solids 383 ppm 330 ppm 325 ppm 310 ppm 366 ppm 320 ppm
Silica 0.16 ppm 0.14 ppm 0.18 ppm 0.14 ppm 0.12 ppm 0.10 ppm
Phosphate 0.38 ppm 0.46 ppm 0.52 ppm 0.54 ppm 0.45 ppm 0.62 ppm
Sulphate 2.3 ppm 2.0 ppm 2.1 ppm 2.6 ppm 2.2 ppm 2.0 ppm
Nitrite 0.018 ppm 0.020 ppm 0.021 ppm 0.020 ppm 0.027 ppm 0.023 ppm
Nitrate 1.8 ppm 2.2 ppm 2.0 ppm 2.1 ppm 2.5 ppm 2.3 ppm
Calcium 412 ppm 396 ppm 406 ppm 402 ppm 392 ppm 410 ppm
Magnesium 1252 ppm 1186 ppm 1230 ppm 1154 ppm 1246 ppm 1216 ppm
Sodium 11216 ppm
11369 ppm
11114 ppm
11549 ppm
11069 ppm
11236 ppm
Potassium 403 ppm 412 ppm 425 ppm 432 ppm 414 ppm 421 ppm
Dissolved Oxygen 5.3 ppm 5.4 ppm 5.4 ppm 5.5 ppm 5.3 ppm 5.2 ppm
COD [Chemical Oxygen Demand] 18 ppm 20 ppm 22 ppm 20 ppm 22 ppm 18 ppm
BOD [Biochemical Oxygen Demand]
1.0 ppm 1.4 ppm 1.4 ppm 1.0 ppm 1.6 ppm 1.4 ppm
NH3-N 0.45 ppm 0.52 ppm 0.36 ppm 0.41 ppm 0.36 ppm 0.39 ppm
Phenol 0.01 ppm 0.01 ppm 0.01 ppm 0.01 ppm 0.01 ppm 0.01 ppm
Oil & Grease 1.8 ppm 2.0ppm 1.6 ppm 2.0 ppm 2.2 ppm 1.8 ppm
SPC [Standard Plate Count] 32 22 26 28 28 25
Bacteriological count [MPN] 26 34 40 32 30 28
Fecal Coliforms 50 56 52 66 56 42
Organic Carbon 1156 ppb 1124 ppb 1218 ppb 1232 ppb 1212 ppb 1240 ppb
Total Organic Matter 110 ppm 116 ppm 120 ppm 124 ppm 122 ppm 123 ppm
Inorganic Phosphates 0.20 ppm 0.26 ppm 0.22 ppm 0.26 ppm 0.28 ppm 0.22 ppm
3.9.4.1 Result Interpretation
The Marine concentration for Temperature ranges from 22.4 to 24.8 in Post monsoon season,
23.1 to 25 in Pre monsoon seaon, and from 22.3 to 24.2 during monsoon season.
PH ranges from 8.1 to 8.24 in Post Monsoon season, 8.18 to 8.26 in Pre monsoon season and
from 8.09 to 8.24 during monsoon season.
Salinity ranges from 33 ppt to 34 ppt in Post and Pre monsoon season, and from 33.2 ppt to
34.2 ppt during monsoon season.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 195
Dissolved Oxygen ranges from 5.4 ppm to 6.4 ppm in Post monsoon season, 5.2 ppm to 5.8
ppm in Pre monsoon seaon and from 5.2 ppm to 5.5 ppm during monsoon season.
Total Suspended Solids ranges from 310 ppm to 394 ppm in Post monsoon season, 306 ppm to
374 ppm in Pre monsoon seaon and from 310 ppm to 383 ppm during monsoon season.
Total Dissolved Solids ranges from 35652 ppm to 37241 ppm in Post monsson season, 36333
ppm to 36985 ppm in pre monsoon season and from 36154 ppm to 37021 ppm.
BOD (Biochemical Oxygen Demand) ranges from 1.2 ppm to 1.8 ppm in Post Monsoon Season,
1.0 ppm to 1.6 ppm in Pre monsoon season and from 1.0 ppm to 1.6 ppm in Monsoon Season.
SEDIMENT QUALITY MONITORING
Sediment sampling locations are given in the below Table 3.65.
Table 3.65: Sediment Quality Monitoring Locations
Sr. No. Locations Sampling
Code Direction Dist. (Km)
Coordinates
North East
1. Near Harbour SD1 -- -- 18°32'23.10"N 84°20'21.07"E
2. Harbour SD2 -- -- 18°31'57.51"N 84°19'47.69"E
3. Bay of Bengal SD3 NW 8.15 18°36'6.99"N 84°25'9.08"E
4. Bay of Bengal SD4 ESE 7.7 18°30'43.18"N 84°25'7.31"E
The Sediment sampling photographs are shown as Figure 3.28. Sediment sampling results for all three
seasons are given in the below Table 3.66 to Table 3.68.
Figure 3.28: Sediment Quality Sampling Photographs
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 196
Table 3.66: Sediment Quality results for Post-Monsoon Season Parameters SD1 SD2 SD3 SD4
Nutrients Analysis in Sediment
Anions
Silicates 1.24 ppm 1.23 ppm 1.23 ppm 1.23 ppm
PO3-4 P 1.18 ppm 1.18 ppm 1.14 ppm 1.18 ppm
SO4 2.4 ppm 2.4 ppm 2.8 ppm 2.8 ppm
NO3-N 1.06 ppm 0.56 ppm 1.08 ppm 0.90 ppm
NO2 N 0.02 ppm 0.04 ppm 0.06 ppm 0.04 ppm
Cations
Ca2+ 1.4 ppm 1.4 ppm 1.2 ppm 1.8 ppm
Mg2+, 1.23 ppm 1.23 ppm 1.23 ppm 1.24 ppm
Na+, 1.16 ppm 1.16 ppm 1.16 ppm 1.16 ppm
K+. 1.18 ppm 1.18 ppm 1.14 ppm 1.12 ppm
Table 3.67: Sediment Quality results for Pre-Monsoon Season
Parameters SD1 SD2 SD3 SD4
Nutrients Analysis in Sediment
Anions
Silicates 1.23 ppm 1.23 ppm 1.24 ppm 1.26 ppm
PO3-4 P 1.18 ppm 1.18 ppm 1.18 ppm 1.12 ppm
SO4 2.8 ppm 2.4 ppm 2.4 ppm 2.2 ppm
NO3-N 1.06 ppm 0.84 ppm 1.01 ppm 0.93 ppm
NO2 N 0.08 ppm 0.04 ppm 0.02 ppm 0.04 ppm
Cations
Ca2+ 1.2 ppm 1.42 ppm 1.46 ppm 1.62 ppm
Mg2+ 1.28 ppm 1.23 ppm 1.23 ppm 1.24 ppm
Na+ 1.16 ppm 1.16 ppm 1.16 ppm 1.16 ppm
K+ 1.18 ppm 1.18 ppm 1.12 ppm 1.18 ppm
Table 3.68: Sediment Quality results for Monsoon Season
Parameters SD1 SD2 SD3 SD4
Nutrients Analysis in Sediment
Anions
Silicates 1.22 ppm 1.20 ppm 1.23 ppm 1.24 ppm
PO3-4 P 1.14 ppm 1.10 ppm 1.12 ppm 1.14 ppm
SO4 2.6 ppm 2.2 ppm 2.6 ppm 2.4 ppm
NO3-N 0.78 ppm 0.84 ppm 0.65 ppm 0.82 ppm
NO2 N 0.04 ppm 0.04 ppm 0.02 ppm 0.04 ppm
Cations
Ca2+ 1.2 ppm 1.42 ppm 1.46 ppm 1.62 ppm
Mg2+ 1.28 ppm 1.23 ppm 1.23 ppm 1.24 ppm
Na+ 1.16 ppm 1.16 ppm 1.16 ppm 1.16 ppm
K+ 1.18 ppm 1.18 ppm 1.12 ppm 1.18 ppm
3.9.5.1 Result Interpretation
The sediment concentration for silicates ranges from 1.23ppm to 1.24ppm in Post monsoon
season 1.23ppm to 1.26ppm in pre monsoon season and from 1.22 ppm to 1.24 ppm in
monsoon season.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 197
PO3-4 P ranges from 1.14 ppm to 1.18 ppm in Post Monsoon season, 1.12 ppm to 1.18 ppm,
SO4 ranges from 2.2 ppm to 2.8 ppm in Pre Monsoon Season, 1.10 ppm to 1.14 ppm in
Monsoon season.
Ca2+ ranges from 1.2 ppm to 1.8 ppm in Post monsoon season , Ca2+ ranges from 1.2 ppm to
1.62 ppm in Pre Monsoon Season, 1.2 ppm to 1.62 ppm in Monsoon season,
Mg2+ ranges from 1.23 ppm in Post monsoon season, 1.23 ppm to 1.28 ppm in Pre Monsoon
Season, 1.23 ppm to 1.28 ppm in Monsoon season.
CREEK WATER QUALITY MONITORING
The creek water from Tekkali creek were also sampled during Post Monsoon, Pre Monsoon and
Monsoon season. Following Table 3.69 shows the creek water sampling locations.
Table 3.69: Creek Sampling Locations
Sr. No. Sampling
Code
Coordinates
North East
1 CW1 18°33'48.62"N 84°21'18.84"E
2 CW2 18°32'59.54"N 84°20'12.50"E
3 CW3 18°33'13.75"N 84°20'3.25"E
4 CW4 18°34'7.91"N 84°18'40.36"E
3.9.6.1 Creek Quality Monitoring Results
The creek water analysis results for Post Monsoon, Pre Monsoon and Monsoon season is given in the
Table 3.70 to Table 3.72 respectively.
Table 3.70: Summary of Creek Quality Results (Post Monsoon Season) S. No. Parameters S1 S2 S3
CW-1 Post Mosoon Season
Physical Characteristics
1 Temperature 24.7 24.6 25
2. pH 8.09 7.94 8.05
3. Salinity 19.2 ppt 16.8 ppt 18.3 ppt
4. Turbidity 4.5 NTU 5.4 NTU 6.0 NTU
5. Total Solids 16985 ppm 15741 ppm 18241 ppm
6. Total Dissolved Solids 15981 ppm 15693 ppm 17154 ppm
7. Total Suspended Solids 156 ppm 184 ppm 175 ppm
8. Silica 0.05 ppm 0.03 ppm 0.04 ppm
9. Phosphate 0.15 ppm 0.14 ppm 0.15 ppm
10. Sulphate 48.4 ppm 52.3 ppm 58.6 ppm
11. Nitrite 0.1 ppm 0.11 ppm 0.22 ppm
12. Nitrate 4.8 ppm 5.6 ppm 6.2 ppm
13. Calcium 211 ppm 206 ppm 220 ppm
14. Magnesium 652 ppm 686 ppm 630 ppm
15. Sodium 5116 ppm 5269 ppm 5214 ppm
16. Potassium 210 ppm 205 ppm 198 ppm
Biochemical Characteristics
17. Dissolved Oxygen 5.6 ppm 6.0 ppm 6.1 ppm
18. COD [Chemical Oxygen Demand] 48 ppm 60 ppm 72 ppm
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 198
S. No. Parameters S1 S2 S3
19. BOD [Biochemical Oxygen Demand] 12.5 ppm 16.4 ppm 14.4 ppm
20. NH3-N 0.22 ppm 0.18 ppm 0.26 ppm
21. Phenol 0.01 ppm 0.01 ppm 0.01 ppm
22. Oil & Grease <1 ppm <1 ppm <1 ppm
23. SPC [Standard Plate Count] 65 74 56
24. Bacteriological count [MPN] 12 16 15
25. Fecal Coliforms 21 26 32
Sediment Characteristics
26 Organic Carbon 756 ppb 782 ppb 721 ppb
27 Total Organic Matter 87 ppm 96 ppm 78 ppm
28 Inorganic Phosphates 0.10 ppm 0.08 ppm 0.09 ppm
CW-2 Post monsoon Season
Physical Characteristics
1 Temperature 25.5 24.8 24.6
2. pH 7.78 7.57 7.98
3. Salinity 14.5 ppt 13.4 ppt 15.8 ppt
4. Turbidity 5.6 NTU 4.8 NTU 5.5 NTU
5. Total Solids 13458 ppm 12684 ppm 14584 ppm
6. Total Dissolved Solids 12987 ppm 12043 ppm 14154 ppm
7. Total Suspended Solids 106 ppm 124 ppm 135 ppm
8. Silica 0.04 ppm 0.08 ppm 0.07 ppm
9. Phosphate 0.10 ppm 0.11 ppm 0.12 ppm
10. Sulphate 32.4 ppm 24.3 ppm 38.6 ppm
11. Nitrite 0.06 ppm 0.09 ppm 0.15 ppm
12. Nitrate 7.8 ppm 5.5 ppm 4.7 ppm
13. Calcium 192 ppm 188 ppm 210 ppm
14. Magnesium 456 ppm 486 ppm 430 ppm
15. Sodium 4522 ppm 4036 ppm 4713 ppm
16. Potassium 156 ppm 174 ppm 188 ppm
Biochemical Characteristics
17. Dissolved Oxygen 6.3 ppm 6.0 ppm 5.9 ppm
18. COD [Chemical Oxygen Demand] 62 ppm 55 ppm 65 ppm
19. BOD [Biochemical Oxygen Demand] 8.2 ppm 10.4 ppm 12.4 ppm
20. NH3-N 0.34 ppm 0.42 ppm 0.60 ppm
21. Phenol 0.01 ppm 0.01 ppm 0.01 ppm
22. Oil & Grease <1 ppm <1 ppm <1 ppm
23. SPC [Standard Plate Count] 65 74 80
24. Bacteriological count [MPN] 32 45 32
25. Fecal Coliforms 20 26 12
Sediment Characteristics
26 Organic Carbon 654 ppb 541 ppb 821 ppb
27 Total Organic Matter 51 ppm 74 ppm 67 ppm
28 Inorganic Phosphates 0.07 ppm 0.06 ppm 0.10 ppm
CW-3 Post monsoon Season
Physical Characteristics
1 Temperature 22.6 24.1 25
2. pH 7.45 7.62 7.84
3. Salinity 14.1 ppt 13.5 ppt 12.9 ppt
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 199
S. No. Parameters S1 S2 S3
4. Turbidity 5.6 NTU 3.8 NTU 4.6 NTU
5. Total Solids 12542 ppm 11684 ppm 11054 ppm
6. Total Dissolved Solids 11987 ppm 11043 ppm 10754 ppm
7. Total Suspended Solids 112 ppm 130 ppm 105 ppm
8. Silica 0.1 ppm 0.1 ppm 0.2 ppm
9. Phosphate 0.10 ppm 0.12 ppm 0.10 ppm
10. Sulphate 32.1 ppm 36.2 ppm 40.4 ppm
11. Nitrite 0.20 ppm 0.11 ppm 0.15 ppm
12. Nitrate 6.5 ppm 4.2 ppm 5.3 ppm
13. Calcium 196 ppm 186 ppm 200 ppm
14. Magnesium 345 ppm 380 ppm 355 ppm
15. Sodium 4512 ppm 4326 ppm 4024 ppm
16. Potassium 185 ppm 173 ppm 155 ppm
Biochemical Characteristics
17. Dissolved Oxygen 5.9 ppm 5.6 ppm 6.2 ppm
18. COD [Chemical Oxygen Demand] 36 ppm 42 ppm 32 ppm
19. BOD [Biochemical Oxygen Demand] 8.0 ppm 10.2 ppm 12.3 ppm
20. NH3-N 0.25 ppm 0.12 ppm 0.16 ppm
21. Phenol 0.01 ppm 0.01 ppm 0.01 ppm
22. Oil & Grease <1 ppm <1 ppm <1 ppm
23. SPC [Standard Plate Count] 50 56 52
24. Bacteriological count [MPN] 28 24 30
25. Fecal Coliforms 16 21 14
Sediment Characteristics
26 Organic Carbon 842 ppb 645 ppb 735 ppb
27 Total Organic Matter 42 ppm 56 ppm 38 ppm
28 Inorganic Phosphates 0.05 ppm 0.07 ppm 0.12 ppm
CW-4 Post monsoon Season
Physical Characteristics
1 Temperature 25.1 24.2 24.8
2. pH 7.8 7.41 7.54
3. Salinity 10.8 ppt 11.4 ppt 11.0 ppt
4. Turbidity 3.4 NTU 4.3 NTU 5.1 NTU
5. Total Solids 9845 ppm 11684 ppm 10564 ppm
6. Total Dissolved Solids 9607 ppm 10743 ppm 10250 ppm
7. Total Suspended Solids 102 ppm 110 ppm 95 ppm
8. Silica 0.06 ppm 0.04 ppm 0.05 ppm
9. Phosphate 0.12 ppm 0.10 ppm 0.09 ppm
10. Sulphate 34.1 ppm 32.5 ppm 34.8 ppm
11. Nitrite 0.21 ppm 0.18 ppm 0.24 ppm
12. Nitrate 5.6 ppm 6.0 ppm 6.4 ppm
13. Calcium 117 ppm 135 ppm 120 ppm
14. Magnesium 352 ppm 386 ppm 370 ppm
15. Sodium 3016 ppm 3142 ppm 3160 ppm
16. Potassium 102 ppm 110 ppm 95 ppm
Biochemical Characteristics
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 200
S. No. Parameters S1 S2 S3
17. Dissolved Oxygen 5.6 ppm 6.0 ppm 5.8 ppm
18. COD [Chemical Oxygen Demand] 30 ppm 42 ppm 40 ppm
19. BOD [Biochemical Oxygen Demand] 8.0 ppm 10.2 ppm 12.0 ppm
20. NH3-N 0.16 ppm 0.22 ppm 0.16 ppm
21. Phenol 0.01 ppm 0.01 ppm 0.01 ppm
22. Oil & Grease <1 ppm <1 ppm <1 ppm
23. SPC [Standard Plate Count] 56 57 56
24. Bacteriological count [MPN] 36 34 40
25. Fecal Coliforms 10 26 12
Sediment Characteristics
26 Organic Carbon 656 ppb 751 ppb 735 ppb
27 Total Organic Matter 47 ppm 52 ppm 68 ppm
28 Inorganic Phosphates 0.09 ppm 0.06 ppm 0.08 ppm
Table 3.71: Summary of Creek Quality Results (Pre Monsoon Season) S. No. Parameters S1 S2 S3
CW-1 Pre Monsoon Season
Physical Characteristics
1 Temperature 24.3 25.2 24.8
2. pH 8.05 7.88 8.03
3. Salinity 18.3 ppt 16.8 ppt 20.3 ppt
4. Turbidity 4.2 NTU 5.8 NTU 6.6 NTU
5. Total Solids 16542 ppm 15684 ppm 18054 ppm
6. Total Dissolved Solids 15987 ppm 15043 ppm 17154 ppm
7. Total Suspended Solids 156 ppm 184 ppm 175 ppm
8. Silica 0.05 ppm 0.03 ppm 0.04 ppm
9. Phosphate 0.15 ppm 0.14 ppm 0.15 ppm
10. Sulphate 48.4 ppm 52.3 ppm 58.6 ppm
11. Nitrite 0.1 ppm 0.11 ppm 0.22 ppm
12. Nitrate 4.8 ppm 5.6 ppm 6.2 ppm
13. Calcium 211 ppm 206 ppm 220 ppm
14. Magnesium 652 ppm 686 ppm 630 ppm
15. Sodium 5216 ppm 5369 ppm 5114 ppm
16. Potassium 201 ppm 210 ppm 195 ppm
Biochemical Characteristics
17. Dissolved Oxygen 5.8 ppm 6.1 ppm 6.0 ppm
18. COD [Chemical Oxygen Demand] 48 ppm 60 ppm 72 ppm
19. BOD [Biochemical Oxygen Demand] 12.5 ppm 16.4 ppm 14.4 ppm
20. NH3-N 0.22 ppm 0.18 ppm 0.26 ppm
21. Phenol 0.01 ppm 0.01 ppm 0.01 ppm
22. Oil & Grease <1 ppm <1 ppm <1 ppm
23. SPC [Standard Plate Count] 65 74 56
24. Bacteriological count [MPN] 12 16 15
25. Fecal Coliforms 21 26 32
Sediment Characteristics
26 Organic Carbon 756 ppb 782 ppb 721 ppb
27 Total Organic Matter 87 ppm 96 ppm 78 ppm
28 Inorganic Phosphates 0.10 ppm 0.08 ppm 0.09 ppm
CW-2 Post monsoon Season
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 201
S. No. Parameters S1 S2 S3
CW-1 Pre Monsoon Season
Physical Characteristics
1 Temperature 25.5 24.8 24.6
2. pH 7.78 7.57 7.98
3. Salinity 14.5 ppt 13.4 ppt 15.8 ppt
4. Turbidity 5.6 NTU 4.8 NTU 5.5 NTU
5. Total Solids 13458 ppm 12684 ppm 14584 ppm
6. Total Dissolved Solids 12987 ppm 12043 ppm 14154 ppm
7. Total Suspended Solids 106 ppm 124 ppm 135 ppm
8. Silica 0.04 ppm 0.08 ppm 0.07 ppm
9. Phosphate 0.10 ppm 0.11 ppm 0.12 ppm
10. Sulphate 32.4 ppm 24.3 ppm 38.6 ppm
11. Nitrite 0.06 ppm 0.09 ppm 0.15 ppm
12. Nitrate 7.8 ppm 5.5 ppm 4.7 ppm
13. Calcium 192 ppm 188 ppm 210 ppm
14. Magnesium 456 ppm 486 ppm 430 ppm
15. Sodium 4522 ppm 4036 ppm 4713 ppm
16. Potassium 156 ppm 174 ppm 188 ppm
Biochemical Characteristics
17. Dissolved Oxygen 6.3 ppm 6.0 ppm 5.9 ppm
18. COD [Chemical Oxygen Demand] 62 ppm 55 ppm 65 ppm
19. BOD [Biochemical Oxygen Demand] 8.2 ppm 10.4 ppm 12.4 ppm
20. NH3-N 0.34 ppm 0.42 ppm 0.60 ppm
21. Phenol 0.01 ppm 0.01 ppm 0.01 ppm
22. Oil & Grease <1 ppm <1 ppm <1 ppm
23. SPC [Standard Plate Count] 65 74 80
24. Bacteriological count [MPN] 32 45 32
25. Fecal Coliforms 20 26 12
Sediment Characteristics
26 Organic Carbon 654 ppb 541 ppb 821 ppb
27 Total Organic Matter 51 ppm 74 ppm 67 ppm
28 Inorganic Phosphates 0.07 ppm 0.06 ppm 0.10 ppm
CW-3 Post monsoon Season
Physical Characteristics
1 Temperature 22.6 24.1 25
2. pH 7.45 7.62 7.84
3. Salinity 14.1 ppt 13.5 ppt 12.9 ppt
4. Turbidity 5.6 NTU 3.8 NTU 4.6 NTU
5. Total Solids 12542 ppm 11684 ppm 11054 ppm
6. Total Dissolved Solids 11987 ppm 11043 ppm 10754 ppm
7. Total Suspended Solids 112 ppm 130 ppm 105 ppm
8. Silica 0.1 ppm 0.1 ppm 0.2 ppm
9. Phosphate 0.10 ppm 0.12 ppm 0.10 ppm
10. Sulphate 32.1 ppm 36.2 ppm 40.4 ppm
11. Nitrite 0.20 ppm 0.11 ppm 0.15 ppm
12. Nitrate 6.5 ppm 4.2 ppm 5.3 ppm
13. Calcium 196 ppm 186 ppm 200 ppm
14. Magnesium 345 ppm 380 ppm 355 ppm
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 202
S. No. Parameters S1 S2 S3
CW-1 Pre Monsoon Season
15. Sodium 4512 ppm 4326 ppm 4024 ppm
16. Potassium 185 ppm 173 ppm 155 ppm
Biochemical Characteristics
17. Dissolved Oxygen 5.9 ppm 5.6 ppm 6.2 ppm
18. COD [Chemical Oxygen Demand] 36 ppm 42 ppm 32 ppm
19. BOD [Biochemical Oxygen Demand] 8.0 ppm 10.2 ppm 12.3 ppm
20. NH3-N 0.25 ppm 0.12 ppm 0.16 ppm
21. Phenol 0.01 ppm 0.01 ppm 0.01 ppm
22. Oil & Grease <1 ppm <1 ppm <1 ppm
23. SPC [Standard Plate Count] 50 56 52
24. Bacteriological count [MPN] 28 24 30
25. Fecal Coliforms 16 21 14
Sediment Characteristics
26 Organic Carbon 842 ppb 645 ppb 735 ppb
27 Total Organic Matter 42 ppm 56 ppm 38 ppm
28 Inorganic Phosphates 0.05 ppm 0.07 ppm 0.12 ppm
CW-4 Post monsoon Season
Physical Characteristics
1 Temperature 25.1 24.2 24.8
2. pH 7.8 7.41 7.54
3. Salinity 10.8 ppt 11.4 ppt 11.0 ppt
4. Turbidity 3.4 NTU 4.3 NTU 5.1 NTU
5. Total Solids 9845 ppm 11684 ppm 10564 ppm
6. Total Dissolved Solids 9607 ppm 10743 ppm 10250 ppm
7. Total Suspended Solids 102 ppm 110 ppm 95 ppm
8. Silica 0.06 ppm 0.04 ppm 0.05 ppm
9. Phosphate 0.12 ppm 0.10 ppm 0.09 ppm
10. Sulphate 34.1 ppm 32.5 ppm 34.8 ppm
11. Nitrite 0.21 ppm 0.18 ppm 0.24 ppm
12. Nitrate 5.6 ppm 6.0 ppm 6.4 ppm
13. Calcium 117 ppm 135 ppm 120 ppm
14. Magnesium 352 ppm 386 ppm 370 ppm
15. Sodium 3016 ppm 3142 ppm 3160 ppm
16. Potassium 102 ppm 110 ppm 95 ppm
Biochemical Characteristics
17. Dissolved Oxygen 5.6 ppm 6.0 ppm 5.8 ppm
18. COD [Chemical Oxygen Demand] 30 ppm 42 ppm 40 ppm
19. BOD [Biochemical Oxygen Demand] 8.0 ppm 10.2 ppm 12.0 ppm
20. NH3-N 0.16 ppm 0.22 ppm 0.16 ppm
21. Phenol 0.01 ppm 0.01 ppm 0.01 ppm
22. Oil & Grease <1 ppm <1 ppm <1 ppm
23. SPC [Standard Plate Count] 56 57 56
24. Bacteriological count [MPN] 36 34 40
25. Fecal Coliforms 10 26 12
Sediment Characteristics
26 Organic Carbon 656 ppb 751 ppb 735 ppb
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 203
S. No. Parameters S1 S2 S3
CW-1 Pre Monsoon Season
27 Total Organic Matter 47 ppm 52 ppm 68 ppm
28 Inorganic Phosphates 0.09 ppm 0.06 ppm 0.08 ppm
Table 3.72: Summary of Creek Quality Results (Monsoon Season) S. No. Parameters S1 S2 S3
CW-1 Monsoon Season
Physical Characteristics
1 Temperature 24.2 23.8 25.1
2. pH 7.62 7.41 7.12
3. Salinity 12.3 ppt 11.5 ppt 12.4 ppt
4. Turbidity 3.8 NTU 4.1 NTU 3.9 NTU
5. Total Solids 9956 ppm 9831 ppm 1092 ppm
6. Total Dissolved Solids 9827 ppm 9641 ppm 9910 ppm
7. Total Suspended Solids 98 ppm 103 ppm 95 ppm
8. Silica 0.15 ppm 0.12 ppm 0.11 ppm
9. Phosphate 0.06 ppm 0.10 ppm 0.06 ppm
10. Sulphate 16.4 ppm 18.5 ppm 21.3 ppm
11. Nitrite 0.14 ppm 0.18 ppm 0.12 ppm
12. Nitrate 6.0 ppm 3.6 ppm 4.1 ppm
13. Calcium 154 ppm 166 ppm 180 ppm
14. Magnesium 376 ppm 392 ppm 360 ppm
15. Sodium 3214 ppm 3325 ppm 3365 ppm
16. Potassium 132 ppm 153 ppm 144 ppm
Biochemical Characteristics
17. Dissolved Oxygen 5.7 ppm 5.2 ppm 5.6 ppm
18. COD [Chemical Oxygen Demand] 32 ppm 32 ppm 28 ppm
19. BOD [Biochemical Oxygen Demand] 6.8 ppm 8.4 ppm 9.0 ppm
20. NH3-N 0.32 ppm 0.12 ppm 0.16 ppm
21. Phenol 0.01 ppm 0.01 ppm 0.01 ppm
22. Oil & Grease <1 ppm <1 ppm <1 ppm
23. SPC [Standard Plate Count] 50 56 52
24. Bacteriological count [MPN] 28 24 30
25. Fecal Coliforms 16 21 14
Sediment Characteristics
26 Organic Carbon 842 ppb 645 ppb 735 ppb
27 Total Organic Matter 42 ppm 56 ppm 38 ppm
28 Inorganic Phosphates 0.05 ppm 0.07 ppm 0.12 ppm
CW-2 Monsoon Season
Physical Characteristics
1 Temperature 24.8 25.1 24.2
2. pH 6.98 7.24 7.41
3. Salinity 15.5 ppt 14.4 ppt 15.2 ppt
4. Turbidity 5.6 NTU 4.8 NTU 5.5 NTU
5. Total Solids 12858 ppm 12484 ppm 13584 ppm
6. Total Dissolved Solids 11282 ppm 11131 ppm 12142 ppm
7. Total Suspended Solids 110 ppm 120 ppm 122 ppm
8. Silica 0.04 ppm 0.08 ppm 0.07 ppm
9. Phosphate 0.10 ppm 0.11 ppm 0.12 ppm
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 204
S. No. Parameters S1 S2 S3
CW-1 Monsoon Season
10. Sulphate 32.4 ppm 24.3 ppm 38.6 ppm
11. Nitrite 0.06 ppm 0.09 ppm 0.15 ppm
12. Nitrate 7.8 ppm 5.5 ppm 4.7 ppm
13. Calcium 192 ppm 188 ppm 210 ppm
14. Magnesium 456 ppm 486 ppm 430 ppm
15. Sodium 4522 ppm 4036 ppm 4713 ppm
16. Potassium 156 ppm 174 ppm 188 ppm
Biochemical Characteristics
17. Dissolved Oxygen 6.3 ppm 6.0 ppm 5.9 ppm
18. COD [Chemical Oxygen Demand] 62 ppm 55 ppm 65 ppm
19. BOD [Biochemical Oxygen Demand] 8.2 ppm 10.4 ppm 12.4 ppm
20. NH3-N 0.34 ppm 0.42 ppm 0.60 ppm
21. Phenol 0.01 ppm 0.01 ppm 0.01 ppm
22. Oil & Grease <1 ppm <1 ppm <1 ppm
23. SPC [Standard Plate Count] 65 74 80
24. Bacteriological count [MPN] 32 45 32
25. Fecal Coliforms 20 26 12
Sediment Characteristics
26 Organic Carbon 654 ppb 541 ppb 821 ppb
27 Total Organic Matter 51 ppm 74 ppm 67 ppm
28 Inorganic Phosphates 0.07 ppm 0.06 ppm 0.10 ppm
CW-3 Monsoon Season
Physical Characteristics
1 Temperature 22.6 24.1 25
2. pH 7.45 7.62 7.84
3. Salinity 14.1 ppt 13.5 ppt 12.9 ppt
4. Turbidity 5.6 NTU 3.8 NTU 4.6 NTU
5. Total Solids 12542 ppm 11684 ppm 11054 ppm
6. Total Dissolved Solids 11987 ppm 11043 ppm 10754 ppm
7. Total Suspended Solids 112 ppm 130 ppm 105 ppm
8. Silica 0.1 ppm 0.1 ppm 0.2 ppm
9. Phosphate 0.10 ppm 0.12 ppm 0.10 ppm
10. Sulphate 32.1 ppm 36.2 ppm 40.4 ppm
11. Nitrite 0.20 ppm 0.11 ppm 0.15 ppm
12. Nitrate 6.5 ppm 4.2 ppm 5.3 ppm
13. Calcium 196 ppm 186 ppm 200 ppm
14. Magnesium 345 ppm 380 ppm 355 ppm
15. Sodium 4512 ppm 4326 ppm 4024 ppm
16. Potassium 185 ppm 173 ppm 155 ppm
Biochemical Characteristics
17. Dissolved Oxygen 5.9 ppm 5.6 ppm 6.2 ppm
18. COD [Chemical Oxygen Demand] 36 ppm 42 ppm 32 ppm
19. BOD [Biochemical Oxygen Demand] 8.0 ppm 10.2 ppm 12.3 ppm
20. NH3-N 0.25 ppm 0.12 ppm 0.16 ppm
21. Phenol 0.01 ppm 0.01 ppm 0.01 ppm
22. Oil & Grease <1 ppm <1 ppm <1 ppm
23. SPC [Standard Plate Count] 50 56 52
24. Bacteriological count [MPN] 28 24 30
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 205
S. No. Parameters S1 S2 S3
CW-1 Monsoon Season
25. Fecal Coliforms 16 21 14
Sediment Characteristics
26 Organic Carbon 802 ppb 695 ppb 715 ppb
27 Total Organic Matter 38 ppm 52 ppm 40 ppm
28 Inorganic Phosphates 0.05 ppm 0.07 ppm 0.12 ppm
CW-4 Monsoon Season
Physical Characteristics
1 Temperature 25.1 24.2 24.8
2. pH 7.8 7.41 7.54
3. Salinity 10.8 ppt 11.4 ppt 11.0 ppt
4. Turbidity 3.4 NTU 4.3 NTU 5.1 NTU
5. Total Solids 9845 ppm 11684 ppm 10564 ppm
6. Total Dissolved Solids 9607 ppm 10743 ppm 10250 ppm
7. Total Suspended Solids 102 ppm 110 ppm 95 ppm
8. Silica 0.06 ppm 0.04 ppm 0.05 ppm
9. Phosphate 0.12 ppm 0.10 ppm 0.09 ppm
10. Sulphate 34.1 ppm 32.5 ppm 34.8 ppm
11. Nitrite 0.21 ppm 0.18 ppm 0.24 ppm
12. Nitrate 5.6 ppm 6.0 ppm 6.4 ppm
13. Calcium 117 ppm 135 ppm 120 ppm
14. Magnesium 352 ppm 386 ppm 370 ppm
15. Sodium 3016 ppm 3142 ppm 3160 ppm
16. Potassium 102 ppm 110 ppm 95 ppm
Biochemical Characteristics
17. Dissolved Oxygen 5.6 ppm 6.0 ppm 5.8 ppm
18. COD [Chemical Oxygen Demand] 30 ppm 42 ppm 40 ppm
19. BOD [Biochemical Oxygen Demand] 8.0 ppm 10.2 ppm 12.0 ppm
20. NH3-N 0.16 ppm 0.22 ppm 0.16 ppm
21. Phenol 0.01 ppm 0.01 ppm 0.01 ppm
22. Oil & Grease <1 ppm <1 ppm <1 ppm
23. SPC [Standard Plate Count] 56 57 56
24. Bacteriological count [MPN] 36 34 40
25. Fecal Coliforms 10 26 12
Sediment Characteristics
26 Organic Carbon 656 ppb 751 ppb 735 ppb
27 Total Organic Matter 47 ppm 52 ppm 68 ppm
28 Inorganic Phosphates 0.09 ppm 0.06 ppm 0.08 ppm
3.9.6.2 Result Interpretation
Physical, Biochemical and Sediment Characteristics were analysed for creek water samples from three
seasons as given in the above tables.
Where, total Suspended Solids ranges from 1715 ppm to 9845 ppm in Post monsoon season,
18054 ppm to 9607 ppm in Pre monsoon seaon and from 12142 ppm to 9607 ppm during
monsoon season.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 206
BOD (Biochemical Oxygen Demand) ranges from 8.0 ppm to 14.4 ppm ppm in Post Monsoon
Season, 6.8 ppm to 12.3 ppm in Pre monsoon season and from 5.6 ppm to 12.3 ppm in
Monsoon Season.
Total Organic Matter ranges from 42 ppt to 96 ppt in Post monsoon, and from 42 ppm to 74
ppm during pre monsoon and monsoon season.
3.10 SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT
PROJECT IMPACT AREA
The proposed Development of Greenfield Port at Bhavanapadu falls under Srikakulam district in the
State of Andhra Pradesh. The Primary Project Impact Area (PIA) is identified as direct project impact
area that is the villages under which proposed project falls. The project may also have major influence in
Srikakulam District (secondary PIA) and Andhra Pradesh state (tertiary PIA).
The socio-economic profiles of the secondary and tertiary project influence area are based on Census
2011 and other secondary official sources of information. The primary data through Socio-economic
surveys (25%) of the likely project affected households has been collected through stratified sampling
method in the month of November 2021.
3.10.1.1 Tertiary Project Impact Area (PIA): The State of Andhra Pradesh
Demography:The total population of Andhra Pradesh is 4,93,86,799 in which 2,47,38,068 are male and
2,46,48,731 are female. In terms of population, Andhra Pradesh is the tenth largest state in the Country
accounting for 4.10% of the total population of the country, as per 2011 Census. The decadal growth of
population is 9.21% during 2001-11, lower than the All-India's growth rate of 17.70%. With 13 districts
and with a geographical area of 1,62,970 SqKm, Andhra Pradesh ranks as the 8th largest State in the
country. Situated in a tropical region, the state has the 2nd longest coastline in the country with a length
of 974 km.
The density of population for Andhra Pradesh as per 2011 Census is 304 persons per square kilometer,
as against 382 persons per square kilometer at all India level in 2011. The sex ratio in the state was up
from 983 in 2001 to 997 in 2011 and is higher than all India figure of 943.
Literacy: The literacy rate of the State is 67.41% in 2011 as compared to 62.07 percent in 2001. The
literacy rate of the State is lower than the all India literacy rate of 72.98 percent. Literacy in Andhra
Pradesh increased over 37 percentage points from 29.94 percent in 1981 to 67.35 percent in 2011.
Female literacy rate has gone up from 52.72% in 2001 to 59.96% in 2011.
Economic Status of the State: The sectoral growth rates of GVA (Grass Value Added) of Andhra Pradesh
for 2020-21 at constant (2011-12) price are Agriculture: 4.16%, Industry: (-) 3.26% and Services sector: (-
) 6.71%. The Per Capita Income (NSDP) of Andhra Pradesh at current prices has registered a growth of
1.03% as it increased from Rs. 1,68,480 in 2019-20 (FRE) to Rs. 170,215 in 2020-21, Whereas the Per
Capita Income of All India has decreased from Rs. 1,34,186 in 2019-20 to Rs. 1,27,768 (AE) in 2020-21.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 207
The revenue composition of the state in FY 2019-20 indicate that Rs. 57,601 crores accrued from Own
Tax sources, Rs.3315 crores from Own Non-Tax sources and Rs. 50,957 crores of Central Transfers.
Connectivity and Transportation: The total R&B Road Network (excluding National Highways) in the
State as on December 2020 was 46225 Km, comprising 13500 Kms of State Highways, 32725 Kms of
Major district road and Rural roads. The density of National Highways is 13.72 Km per lakh population
(2011) in the State as against all India average of 10.89 km and in terms of area coverage, a length of
41.46 km is available for every 1,000 Sq. km in the State as against all India average of 40.00
km/1,000Sq.km.
There are 38 National Highways in the state of Andhra Pradesh covering a length of 6943.69 Km. Out of
6943.69 Km National Highways in the state, a total length of 2524.15 Km is under the control of NHAI,
833.24 Km with MoRT&H, PIU and 3586.30 Km under the control of State PWD. Under Panchayat Raj
Engineering Department, the total length of the rural roads as on 01.04.2020 in the state is 79,636 KMs.
Currently there are 6 operational Airports in Andhra Pradesh which connect with major cities. Domestic
Airports: Rajahmundry, Kadapa, Orvakallu at Kurnool and Puttaparthi (Pvt) and International Airports:
Vishakhapatnam, Vijayawada and Tirupati. The Orvakallu Airport got both DGCA license and BCAS
approval for public use and the APADCL working towards bring the commercial Airlines to start the
operations and also actively pursuing to bring the Flight Training Organization.
3.10.1.2 Secondary Project Impact Area (PIA): Srikakulam District
Srikakulam District is the extreme Northeastern District of Andhra Pradesh situated within the
geographic Co-ordinates of 180 -20’ and 190 - 10’ of Northern latitude and 830 -50’ and 840 -50’ of
Eastern longitude. The district is bounded on the North by Rayagada, Gajapati & Ganjam districts of
Odisha State, West by Vizianagaram district while South & East by Bay of Bengal. The total area of the
district is 5,837 square kilometres. The district is comprising into 3 revenue divisions (Palakonda,
Srikakulam and Tekkali), 38 revenue Mandals, 1865 revenue villages and 1091 village Panchayats. The
district has also 1 Municipal Corporation (Srikakuram) 3 municipalities (Amudalavalasa, Ichchapuram &
Palasa-Kasibugga) and 2 Nagar Panchayats (Polakonda and Rajam).
3.10.1.3 Demographic Profile of the District
As per Census of India 2011, Srikakulam district had population of 27,03,114, of which male and female
were 13,41,738 (49.64%) and 13,61,376 (50.36%) respectively. The total proportion of population
compounded into 6,81,330 households creating an average household size of approximately 4 persons
per household. The gender ration of the district is 1015 females per 1000 males. Approximately 83.84%
people reside in rural environment while 16.16% people reside in urban environment. There was a
growth of 6.38 percent in the population compared to population of Census 2001. In the previous
census of India 2001, Srikakulam District recorded increase of 9.33 percent to its population compared
to 1991.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 208
Table 3.73: Demographic Profile of the District
Location Household Population Male Female Gender Ratio Population (Below 6 Years)
Rural 572382 2266411 1126888 1139523 1011.21 238331
Urban 108948 436703 214850 221853 1032.59 42706
Total 681330 2703114 1341738 1361376 1014.64 281037 Source: Census of India 2011
The overall density of population in the district is 463 persons per sq.km and is above the State average
of 308. Among the urban areas Srikakulam town recorded highest 7,125 persons per sq.km.
3.10.1.4 Culture and Religion
The population of Srikakulam mostly consists of people belonging to the Telugu community. However,
residents from other communities following different faiths like Islam, Jainism, Buddhism and
Christianity also cohabit in the district. Table 3.74 gives a description of religion wise population
distribution in the district. Around 98.66% of the populations are Hindus, 0.33% are Muslims, 0.70% are
Christians, 0.01% are Sikhs, and approximately 0.29% people did not reveal their religion.
Table 3.74: Religion wise distribution of Population Religion Population Percentage
Hindu 2666950 98.66
Muslim 9025 0.33
Christian 18879 0.70
Sikh 193 0.01
Buddhist 77 0.00
Jain 160 0.01
Other religions and persuasions 106 0.00
Religion not stated 7724 0.29
Total 2703114 100.00 Source: Census of India 2011
The official language of Srikakulam is Telugu. Srikakulam is renowned for its indigenous arts and crafts,
brass products such as bells for temples, cooking utensils, flower pots, lamps and other household
items. Being in the coastal region of Andhra Pradesh, Srikakulam enjoys a rich variety of seafood as well
as rice and dal as its staple diet.
3.10.1.5 Literacy Rate
An average literacy rate of the Srikakulam district is 61.74% while the literacy rate of Male is 71.61%
with respect to the male population and female is 52.08% with respect to the female population. There
is a gender gap of approximately 19.53% between literacy rate of male and female.
Separating for urban and rural areas of the district, the literacy rate worked out to 78.36% and 58.51%
respectively. Again within the urban areas, male and female literacy rates separating worked out to
85.97% and 71.06%. For the rural population the male and female literacy rates worked out to 68.86%
and 48.35%.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 209
3.10.1.6 Social Stratification in the District
The total SC population in the district is 2,55,664 which is 9.46% of the total population while it is 9.48%
in rural area and 9.35% in Urban area. The ST population in the district is 1,66,118 which is 6.15%% of
the total population while it is 7.08% in Rural area and 1.30% in Urban area.
Table 3.75: Social Stratification in the District
S. No. Particulars Scheduled Caste Scheduled Tribes
Number Percentage Number Percentage
1 Rural 214824 9.48 160438 7.08
2 Urban 40840 9.35 5680 1.30
3 Total 255664 9.46 166118 6.15 Source: Census of India 2011
3.10.1.7 Work Participation Rate
The work participation rate for total workers is defined as percentage of total workers to total
population. The total worker’s participation rate in Srikakulam district is 47.7%. Again the percentage of
Main workers to total workers stands at 72.6%. Among the main workers as seen for the percentage of
workers of 2011 over 2001, is increased. The female worker’s participation has gone up from 38.4% in
2001 Census to 38.5% at 2011 Census.
The total worker’s participation rate separately for males and females in the rural areas is 57.6% and
42.1% respectively. Against corresponding figures for urban areas is 54.8% and 19.7% respectively.
The principal crops are bifurcated into Cereals, Pulses, Oilseeds and other crops. Of which under cereals
Rice, Bajra and Raagi are the prominent crops of the district. Green gram, Horse Gram and Black gram
are the prominent Pulses; Groundnut, Sesamum, and Coconut are the prominent oil-seeds of the
district. Cotton, Sugarcane and cashewnut are the other prominent crops; Mangoes, Acid Lime, Behndi,
Brinjal, Green leafy vegetables and Tomatoes are the important vegetables and fruits of the district. The
table below indicates the details of the principal crops for the decade.
PRIMARY PROJECT IMPACT AREA
This section provides an understanding of the demographic profile of the villages in the project affected
area, the social groups present, the livelihood profile of the community. The purpose of this section is to
allow for an increased understanding of the key issues identified as well as identify areas of intervention
in future scenarios. As per the reconnaissance survey and Census of India 2011, there are six numbers of
hamlets namely Kothalingudu, Pathalingudu, Matchilesam Sunnapalle, Reddikasunnapalle, Mulapeta
and Vishnuchakram are coming under Rajapuram village. Out of these six hamlets, the settlement of
Mulapeta and Pathalingudu are impacted and attract Rehabilitation & Resettlement due to the
development of Proposed Bhavanapadu Greenfield Port. Hence, 100% Census and 25% Socio-economic
Survey shall be conducted of PAFs and Resettlement Action Plan shall be prepared and implemented as
per the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation & Resettlement
(Andhra Pradesh Amendment) Act, 2018 and RFCTLARR Act, 2013.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 210
3.10.2.1 Demographic Profile
Details of demographic particulars of affected village Rajapuram is presented in Table 3.76. There are 2
numbers of habitations i.e. Mulapeta and Pathalingudu under Rajapuram village are affected due to
acquisition of land and displacement for the project. The total population of the affected villages are
compounded into 783 households and total population is 3316 in which 1657 (49.97%) are males and
1659 (50.03%) are females. The population of the people below 6 years’ age group is 439 (13.24%). The
average gender ratio of the affected village is 1001 females per thousand males.
Table 3.76: Demographic Profile of the Affected Villages
S. No. Village Household Population
Total Male Female Below 6 Years Gender Ratio
1 Rajapuram 783 3316 1657 1659 439 101
Total 783 3316 1657 1659 439 101
Source: Census of India 2011
3.10.2.2 Social Stratification
With reference to the Table 3.77, only 56 (1.69%) people of Scheduled Castes are dwelling in the village
Rajapuram. As per Census of India 2011, there no any Scheduled Tribes reported in the village
Rajapuram.
Table 3.77: Details of SC and ST Population
S. No. Village Scheduled Caste (SC) Scheduled Tribes
Total Male Female % of SC Total Male Female % of ST
1 Rajapuram 56 24 32 1.69 0 0 0 0
Total 56 24 32 1.69 0 0 0 0
Source: Census of India 2011
3.10.2.3 Literacy Rate
The average literacy rate of the affected village is 50.40% (1450) in which male’s literacy rate is 60.07%
with respect to the male population as against 40.97% for females with respect to the female
population. There is a gender gap of 19.10% between literacy rate of male and female.
Table 3.78: Literacy Rate of the Affected Villages
S. No. Village Number of Literates Literacy Rate Gender Gap
Total Male Female Total Male Female
1 Rajapuram 1450 853 597 50.40 60.07 40.97 19.10
Total 1450 853 597 50.40 60.07 40.97 19.10 Source: Census of India 2011
3.10.2.4 Work Participation Rate
The total number of workers in the affected village are 1860 and the WPR is 56.09% in which male are
57.75% with respect to the male population and females are 54.43% with respect to female population.
There are 3.32% of gender gap between work participation rate of male and female.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 211
Table 3.79: Work Participation Rate of the Affected Villages
S. No. Village Total Worker Work Participation Rate (WPR) Gender Gap
Total Male Female Total Male Female
1 Rajapuram 1860 957 903 56.09 57.75 54.43 3.32
Total 1860 957 903 56.09 57.75 54.43 3.32
Source: Census of India 2011
3.10.2.5 Main Worker and Marginal Worker
Table 3.80 presents details of Main Workers and Marginal Workers. Out of total working population
1358 (73.01%) are Main Workers while 502 (26.99%) are Marginal Workers.
Table 3.80: Main Worker and Marginal Worker
S. No. Village Main Worker Marginal Worker
Total Male Female % Total Male Female %
1 Rajapuram 1358 876 482 73.01 502 81 421 26.99
Total 1358 876 482 73.01 502 81 421 26.99
Source: Census of India 2011
3.10.2.6 Categorization of Main Worker
Further the Main Worker has been categorized into four working categories i.e. Cultivator, Agricultural
Labour, Household Industry Worker and Other Worker. As per Table 3.81, 54.79% of total Main Worker
are engaged in Agricultural Labour followed by Other Workers with 24.37%, Cultivator with 20.47% and
Household Industry Workers with 0.37%.
Table 3.81: Categorization of Main Worker
S.
No. Village
Main
Worker
Cultivator Agricultural
Labour
Household Industry
Worker
Other
Worker
Nos. % Nos. % Nos. % Nos. %
1 Rajapuram 1358 278 20.47 744 54.79 5 0.37 331 24.37
Total 1358 278 20.47 744 54.79 5 0.37 331 24.37
Source: Census of India 2011
3.10.2.7 Categorization of Marginal Worker
Marginal Workers have also been categorized into four working categories i.e. Cultivator, Agricultural
Labour, Household Industry Worker and Other Worker. As per Table 3.82, 78.09% of total Marginal
Worker are engaged in Agricultural Labour followed by Other Workers with 14.94%, Cultivator with
6.57% and Household Industry Workers with 0.40% only.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 212
Table 3.82: Categorization of Marginal Worker
S.
No. Village
Marginal
Worker
Cultivator Agricultural
Labour
Household Industry
Worker
Other
Worker
Nos. % Nos. % Nos. % Nos. %
1 Rajapuram 502 33 6.57 392 78.09 2 0.40 75 14.94
Total 502 33 6.57 392 78.09 2 0.40 75 14.94
Source: Census of India 2011
Hence, it is evident that livelihood of the most of the people of the affected villages are depend on
Agriculture and Other Workers.
3.10.2.8 Social Infrastructure
Educational Infrastructure in the Project Village
There are 6 nos. of Government Primary School and 2 nos. of Govt. Middle School are running in
Rajapuram village and its hamlets. For Secondary, Sr. Secondary and Higher Education people generally
visit Khaspanaupada, Tekkali and Srikakulam that is approximately up to 55 km. from project village.
Table 3.83: Educational Infrastructure
S. No.
Village
Go
vt. P
rim
ary
Sch
oo
l
(No
.)
Go
vt. M
idd
le S
cho
ol
(No
.)
Go
vt. S
eco
nd
ary
Sch
oo
l (N
o.)
Pri
vate
Se
con
dar
y
Sch
oo
l (N
o.)
Go
vt. S
en
ior
Seco
nd
ary
& P
vt
Sen
ior
Seco
nd
ary)
(No
.)
Go
vt. A
rts
and
Scie
nce
De
gre
e
Co
llege
(N
o.)
Go
vt. E
ngi
ne
eri
ng
Co
llege
(N
o.)
Go
vt. M
ed
icin
e
Co
llege
(N
o.)
Go
vt. M
anag
em
en
t
Inst
itu
te (
No
.)
1 Rajapuram 6 2
Total 6 2 Source: Census of India 2011
Health Infrastructure in the Project Village
As per Census of India 2011, there are no any government health facility available in Rajapuram village.
SOCIO-ECONOMIC SURVEY OF PROJECT IMPACT AREA
Socio-economic survey of 25% of Project Affected Families (PAFs) has been conducted with a stratified
sampling method in the village of Mulapeta and Pathlingadu in the month of November 2021. During
the survey approximately 90 household samples have been collected and analyzed. The outcome of
socio-economic survey has been presented in the following sub-sections:
3.10.3.1 Household Composition of PAFs
As per the data presented in the Table 3.85, total population of sample PAFS are 281 in which 245
people comes under 10 to 60 age group, 24 people comes below 10 years of age group and 12 people
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 213
comes above 60 years of age group. Further, out of the total population 153 (54.45%) are male and 128
(45.55%) are female. The gender ratio of the sample population is 836 females per thousand males.
Further, an average household size of the family is 3.12 person per family and all the families come
under the categories of Nuclear Family.
Table 3.84: Household Composition of the People of Affected Villages S. No. Age Group Male Female Total
1 10 to 60 Age Group 130 115 245
2 Children (Below 10 Years) 13 11 24
3 Aged (Above 60 years) 10 2 12
Total 153 128 281
Source: VSPL’s Socio-economic Survey November 2021
3.10.3.2 Social Stratification and Religion of PAFs
The data collected from Socio-economic survey reveals that almost all the sample families belong to the
Other Backwards Castes (OBC). No SC, ST and General Castes families reported during survey. Further, in
the village Pathlingadu and Mulapeta, people belong to the Hindu religion.
3.10.3.3 Land Holding Pattern of the PAFs
The data presented in Table 3.85 reveals that approximately 48.89% of PAFs have agricultural land
between 0.5 to 1 acres, 24.44% have agricultural land between 1 acre to 2 acres, 6.67% have between 3
to 5 acres and 20.00% do not possess any agricultural land i.e. they are landless. The average land
holding size of PAFs are up to 1 acre per families.
Table 3.85: Land Holding Pattern of PAFs S. No Land Holding Size (in Acre) Frequency Percentage
1 0.5 Acre to 1 Acres 44 48.89
2 >1 Acres to 2 Acres 22 24.44
3 >2 Acres to 5 Acres 6 6.67
4 >5 Acres to 10 0 0.00
5 Land Less 18 20.00
Total 90 100.00
Source: VSPL’s Socio-economic Survey November 2021
3.10.3.4 Occupational Pattern of the People of PAFs
The Table 3.86 presents occupational pattern of the people of sample PAFs. The Work Participation Rate
(WPR) of the people of the affected families are 53.38%. Majority of the occupation of the people of the
study area are either farmer or Labour. Approximately 35.33% people engaged in labour work followed
by agricultural work with 32.00%, agricultural labour with 25.33% service with 4.67%, fishing with 1.33%
and business with 0.33% only.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 214
Table 3.86: Occupational Pattern of the People of affected Villages
S. No. Occupation Frequency Percentage
1 Agriculture 48 32.00
2 Agricultural Labour 38 25.33
3 Business 2 1.33
4 Fishing 2 1.33
5 Labour 53 35.33
6 Service 7 4.67
Total 150 100.00
Source: VSPL’s Socio-economic Survey February 2021
3.10.3.5 Income Pattern of the PAFs
As per the data presented in Table 3.87, approximately 31.11% families come between Rs. 60,000/- to
Rs. 1,00,000/- annual income group, 25.56% come between Rs. 1,00,000/- to Rs. 1,50,000/- annual
income group, 20% families come between Rs. 25,000/- to Rs. 600,000/- annual income group, 18.89%
families come between 1,50,000 to 3,00,000 annual income group and 4.44% families come above Rs.
3,00,000/- annual income group. Therefore, it is evident that most of the families of affected villages
have their annual income between Rs. 50,000/ to Rs. 1,50,000/. An average income of the people of the
affected families are approximately Rs. 1,20,000/- per year. Further, based on the analysis made above
and outcome of public consultations, most of the people of the affected villages are depend on
agriculture or labour work for their livelihood. Jwar, makka, pulses, cotton, chillies are the major corps
grown in this region.
Table 3.87: Income Pattern of the PAFs
S. No. Annual Income (in INR) Frequency (HH) Percentage
1 25,000 to 60,000 18 20.00
2 60,001 to 1,00,000 28 31.11
3 1,00,001 to 1,50,000 23 25.56
4 1,50,001 to 3,00,000 17 18.89
5 Above 3,00,001 4 4.44
Total 90 100.00 Source: VSPL’s Socio-economic Survey November 2021
3.10.3.6 Expenditure Pattern of the PAFs
The table below explain the annual expenditure pattern of the people of the study area. Out of the total
samples collected, approximately 55.56% people expend between Rs. 50,000 to Rs. 1,00,000 to fulfil
their daily needs like food, cooking fuel, cloths, health, education, communication, social functions and
agriculture etc. In the same way, approximately 33.33% people expend between Rs. 15,000 to Rs.
50,000 and 10% people expends between Rs. 1,00,000 to Rs. 1,50,000.
Table 3.88: Expenditure Pattern of the PAFs
S. No. Annual Expenditure (in INR) Frequency Percentage
1 15,000 to 50,000 30 33.33
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 215
S. No. Annual Expenditure (in INR) Frequency Percentage
2 50,001 to 1,00,000 50 55.56
3 1,00,001 to 1,50,000 10 11.11
4 1,50,001 to 3,00,000 0 0.00
Total 90 100.00
Source: VSPL’s Socio-economic Survey November 2021
Based on the income and expenditure analysis it is concluded that the people of the study area comes
under low income group.
3.10.3.7 Possession of Durable Consumer Items
Table 3.89 presents status of durable consumer items possessed by PAFs. As per the table below 94.44%
sample families (90 PAFs) possess Mobile phone, 15.56% have Bicycle, 80.00% have Television, 1.11%
have Oven, 97.78% have LPG connections, 1.11% have Computer, 18.89% have Refrigerator, 7.78% have
Washing Machine, 24.44% have Motor Cycle, 4.44% have Car and 2.22% family possess Air conditioner.
Table 3.89: Possession of Durable Consumer Items
S. No. Durable Consumer Item Frequency Percentage
1 Mobile 85 94.44
2 Bicycle 14 15.56
3 Television 72 80.00
4 Oven 1 1.11
5 LPG Connection 88 97.78
6 Computer 1 1.11
7 Refrigerator 17 18.89
8 Washing Machine 7 7.78
9 Motor Cycle 22 24.44
10 Car 4 4.44
11 AC 2 2.22
Source: VSPL’s Socio-economic Survey November 2021
3.10.3.8 Status and Role of Women in Economic Activities
Table 3.90 presents role and status of women in different economic and household activities. Out of the
total sample (90 PAFs) collected approximately 84.44% families accept that the female member of their
families engage in agricultural labour. In the same way, 44.44% families accept that female member of
their families are engage in household work, 13.33% non-agricultural labour, 11.11% in trade and
business, 6.67% in cultivation, 4.44% in service, 4.44% in household industry, 4.44% in collection and sell
of forest products and 3.33% accepts that the female member of their families engage in allied activities.
Table 3.90: Engagement of Women in Economic Activities
S. No. Particular Frequency Percentage
1 Cultivation 6 6.67
2 Allied Activities 3 3.33
3 Collection and sell of forest Product 4 4.44
4 Trade and Business 10 11.11
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 216
S. No. Particular Frequency Percentage
5 Agricultural Labour 76 84.44
6 Non-Agricultural Labour 12 13.33
7 HH Industry 4 4.44
8 Service 4 4.44
9 Household Work 40 44.44
10 Others 6 6.67 Source: VSPL’s Socio-economic Survey November 2021
3.10.3.9 Role of Women in Decision Making
Out of the total sample collected approximately 96.56% PAFs accept that they take the advice of female
members also in daily household matters and jointly they take decision in different household matters.
Table 3.91: Role of Women in Decision Making of Households Matter
S. No. Particulars Frequency Percentage
1 Financial Matters 12 13.33
2 Education of Child 76 84.44
3 Health Care of Child 83 92.22
4 Purchase of Assets 17 18.89
5 Day to day activities 74 82.22
6 Social Function and Marriage 22 24.44
7 Others 7 7.78 Source: VSPL’s Socio-economic Survey November 2021
When it was asked that in which matters they allow their female members to have any says in decision
making; approximately 92.22% PAFs accept that they allow female members to have any says in health
care of child, 84.44% allow in education of child, 82.22% allow in day to day activities, 24.44% allow in
social function and marriage, 18.89% in purchase of assets, 13.33% in financial matters, 7.78% in others
household matters.
Hence, it may be concluded that the people of FAFs allow their female member to have any say in health
care of child, education of child and day to day activities. In these activities, role of female member is
significant and important. Whether as the role of female member is limited and insignificance in
financial matters, purchase of assets and social functions & marriage.
3.10.3.10 Positive Aspects of the Project
The proposed Greenfield Port at Bhavanapadu would see many industries establishing from multiple
sectors with many ancillary & satellite units boosting trade & commerce in an unprecedented way;
thereby bringing in the synergies of development to the state like never before. It will, as a consequence
generates huge direct and indirect employment including the local people, substantially improve the
living standards and generally act as a gateway to prosperity of the entire region.
The proposed project shall provide approximately 10,000 direct and indirect employment opportunity
during project construction and operation period. During project construction phase, approximately
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 217
7500 employment opportunity shall be generated. Local people shall be given priority on the basis of
their skill and education.
Thus, on the basis of available secondary data, preliminary reconnaissance survey and the analysis made
above, it may be concluded that the proposed Bhavanapadu Greenfield Port Project shall prove
beneficial for economic and social development for the vicinity. During project construction and
operation phase, in addition to direct employment opportunity, the proposed project shall promote
indirect employment and development in the region. The standard of life and per capita income of the
people shall be improved. As per the Feasibility Assessment, the project is found to be viable from all
aspects such as technical, economic, environmental and social.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 218
CHAPTER 4 ANTICIPATED IMPACT AND
MITIGATION
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 219
4 ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS & MITIGATION MEASURES
In this chapter, likely impacts of these activities on environmental attributes have been identified,
assessed and presented. To mitigate likely environmental impacts during construction and operation of
Bhavanapadu Port from marine side and landside activities, suitable mitigation measures are
incorporated as a part of planning process. The impacts have been assessed both quantitatively and
qualitatively for various terrestrial and marine environmental components and additional mitigation
measures are proposed.
4.1 CONSTRUCTION PHASE ACTIVITIES
Marine side activities which impact the marine water quality, sediment quality and benthic life are as
follows:
Capital dredging and disposal of capital dredged material
Construction of breakwaters
Construction of cargo berths and installation of cargo handling equipment.
Landside activities which impact air quality, increased in noise levels, impact on water quality and land
environment are as follows:
Breakwater stone transport from quarry and construction material to port site
Site preparation and reclamation by using dredge material
Construction of cargo storage areas
Construction of internal road/rail network, utilities
Construction of worker’s camp
4.2 OPERATION PHASE ACTIVITIES
Marine side activities which impact the marine water quality, sediment quality and benthic life are as
follows:
Cargo loading and unloading at the berths
Vessel/tug/port craft movement and discharges
Maintenance dredging
Landside activities which impact air quality, increased in noise levels, impact on water quality and land
environment are as follows:
Cargo handling and storage at stockyards
Cargo movement
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 220
4.3 CONSTRUCTION IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES
IMPACT DUE TO LAND ACQUISITION
Approximately 1010 Acres of land would be required for the development of proposed Bhavanapadu
Greenfield Port at Rajapuram village, Santhabomali Mandal, Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh. Out of
total land, approximately 320.05 acres of land shall be acquired from patta land (private land), 234.44
acres from salt pan land, 122.06 acres from Coastal Belt land, 66.54 acres from revenue land and 79.00
acres from waste land. In addition, approximately 184.92 acres of land shall also be required for external
rail and road connectivity. While government land shall be transferred from its respective department
by APMB, the patta (private) land shall be acquired by revenue department as per RFCTLARR (Andhra
Pradesh Amendment) Act 2018.
IMPACT DUE TO CAPITAL DREDGING AND DISPOSAL
The estimated capital dredging quantity for the proposed port is computed as 14.00 Milllion cum for
handling the design vessels considered for the port. Nearly 14 Mm3 of capital dredged material will be
used for raising the backup area and remaining 2 Mm3 will be disposed in offshore area identified based
on model studies.
4.3.2.1 Dredge spoil disposal – Mathematical Model Studies
As the CFD model is more accurate and computes turbulence effects and thermal/ salinity mixing,
dredge dispersion very well, the model is extended to encompass the area of Bhavanapadu as projected
in Figure 4.1. The figure indicates the details of physical settings and domain considered for the
advection-dispersion model with the mesh therein.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 221
Figure 4.1: Computational mesh generated from the boundary curve
Modelling the study area
For the advection dispersion model, the lean period is considered with a nominal current of 0.1 m/s
occurring in open sea. In other periods, the ocean is more turbulent and advection - dispersion takes
place much faster. Hence, the scenario considered in the present studies may be said to be critical one
for predicting highest concentrations of sediment in the vicinity of dredge disposal sites. For modelling
turbulence, the Spalart-Allmaras model is used as this is very well suited for coastal applications.
Model inputs and approach
Detailed numerical model studies have been carried out to investigate the hydrodynamics of tides. It is
to be noted that, considering such a time series for the 15 days period covers the spring-neap variations
of the astronomical tide and addresses all variations in the astronomical tides. Typically, the tidal
amplitude and phase for the project site is extracted from TPXO data and the boundary conditions are
implicated as a time varying tidal elevation. The bathymetry used is the measured bathymetry
interpolated with the GEBCO 30 arc second gridded bathymetry. The final mesh has fine elements near
the coastlines and shallower water depths. The mesh size varies from 20-100 m which is very fine for a
simulation such as the present problem. The mesh is coarser near the offshore boundaries, where the
water depths are greater. Figure 4.1 shows the computational mesh generated from the boundary
curve. During the south-west monsoon the dumping ground can be preferably located in the north
direction. In the case of north-east monsson the dredge disposal location can be preferred in the south
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 222
direction. The results are discussed below individually for the two different disposal locations based on
the monsoon conditions.
Results and discussion
Southern Disposal Location:
In the case of north-east monsoon the dredge disposal location can be preferred in the south direction
to counteract the northern drift. The disposal site can be in 18°31'1.19"N, 84°20'45.87"E. For the
considered dredge disposal location the initial sediment concentration is considered as 0 g/l. In order to
obtain the sediment concentration range at the disposal location, a barge size of 60m x 40m, is
considered to dispose the dredged material of quantity, 1500 m3 (approximately) in 20m depth contour
area in regular intervals at every 3 hours interval. As a result, this disposed dredge, will raise the
sediment concentration from 0 g/l to 65g/l at the point of disposal. The results are plotted once the
concentration reaches a steady condition. Based on the model study, for the sediment concentration to
reach from 65 g/l to 32.5 g/l, i.e., 100 dilution, it takes a distance of 50-70m. This high dilution is possible
as the discharge quantity is very less and the water depth of discharge is 20 m. The maximum distance
to the dilution to attain the nearly ambient condition extends up to less than 800-1000m.
Table 4.1: Distance to dilution of dredge dispersion at the time of Flood tide Cycle-north
Number of Dilutions
Distance (m)
Sediment concentration
(g/l)
Max distance
north parallel
coast(m)
Max distance
south parallel
coast(m)
Max distance west from
point of dispersion (m)
Max distance East from point of
dispersion (m)
65-32.5 100 50 60 40 40
32.5-10 550 90 110 65 60
10-0.2 25000 150 450 75 75
0.2-0.1 50000 180 600 130 130
0.1-0 100000 300 700 150 155
Table 4.2: Distance to dilution of dredge dispersion at the time of Ebb tide
Cycle-north
Number of Dilutions
Distance (m)
Sediment concentration
(g/l)
Max distance
north parallel
coast(m)
Max distance
south parallel
coast(m)
Max distance west from
point of dispersion (m)
Max distance East from point of
dispersion (m)
65-32.5 100 50 40 30 30
32.5-10 550 80 60 50 55
10-0.2 25000 110 75 60 65
0.2-0.1 50000 180 100 90 100
0.1-0 100000 250 900 100 130
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 223
Table 4.3: Distance to dilution of dredge dispersion at the time of High tide
Cycle-north
Number of Dilutions
Distance (m)
Sediment concentration
(g/l)
Max distance
north parallel
coast(m)
Max distance
south parallel
coast(m)
Max distance west from
point of dispersion (m)
Max distance East from point of
dispersion (m)
65-32.5 100 50 60 40 40
32.5-10 550 110 90 65 60
10-0.2 25000 450 150 75 75
0.2-0.1 50000 600 180 135 140
0.1-0 100000 1000 300 160 165
Table 4.4: Distance to dilution of dredge dispersion at the time of Low tide
Cycle-north
Number of Dilutions
Distance (m)
Sediment concentration
(g/l)
Max distance
north parallel
coast(m)
Max distance
south parallel
coast(m)
Max distance west from
point of dispersion (m)
Max distance East from point of
dispersion (m)
65-32.5 100 50 40 30 30
32.5-10 550 80 60 50 55
10-0.2 25000 110 75 60 65
0.2-0.1 50000 180 100 90 110
0.1-0 100000 250 1200 100 130
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 224
Figure 4.2: Dredge dispersion pattern during flooding tide (offshore)
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 225
Figure 4.3: Dredge dispersion pattern during high tide (offshore)
Figure 4.4: Dredge dispersion pattern during ebbing tide (offshore)
Figure 4.5: Dredge dispersion pattern during low tide (offshore)
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 226
Northern Disposal Location
In the case of south-west monsoon the dumping ground can be preferably located in the north direction
to counteract the southern drift. The dredge disposal location can be fixed at a depth of 25m contours.
The disposal site can be in 18° 32'17.96"N, 84° 22'58.66"E. For the considered dredge disposal location,
the initial sediment concentration is considered as 0 g/l. In order to obtain the sediment concentration,
range at the disposal location, a barge size of 60m x 40m, is considered to dispose the dredged material
of quantity, 1500 m3 (approximately) in 25m depth contour area in regular intervals at every 3 hours
interval. As a result this disposed dredge will raise the sediment concentration from 0 g/l to 65g/l at the
point of disposal. Based on the model study, for the sediment concentration to reach from 65 g/l to 32.5
g/l, i.e., 100 dilution, it takes a distance of 40-80m around the point of dispersion. This high dilution is
possible as the discharge quantity is very less and the water depth of discharge is 25 m. The maximum
distance to the dilution to attain the nearly ambient condition extends up to less than 300-500m. The
results are plotted once the concentration reaches a steady condition after initial dispersion.
Table 4.5: Distance to dilution of dredge dispersion at the time of Flood tide Cycle-north
Number of Dilutions
Distance (m)
Sediment concentration
(g/l)
Max distance
north parallel
coast(m)
Max distance
south parallel
coast(m)
Max distance west from
point of dispersion (m)
Max distance East from point of
dispersion (m)
65-32.5 100 40 80 30 20
32.5-10 550 120 180 50 40
10-0.2 25000 150 240 70 60
0.2-0.1 50000 175 310 100 80
0.1-0 100000 200 680 140 120
Table 4.6: Distance to dilution of dredge dispersion at the time of Ebb tide
Cycle-north
Number of Dilutions
Distance (m)
Sediment concentration
(g/l)
Max distance
north parallel
coast(m)
Max distance
south parallel
coast(m)
Max distance west from
point of dispersion (m)
Max distance East from point of
dispersion (m)
65-32.5 100 65 90 25 20
32.5-10 550 160 130 50 40
10-0.2 25000 180 150 70 65
0.2-0.1 50000 250 200 110 120
0.1-0 100000 500 290 150 220
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 227
Table 4.7: Distance to dilution of dredge dispersion at the time of High tide Cycle-north
Number of Dilutions
Distance (m)
Sediment concentration
(g/l)
Max distance
north parallel
coast(m)
Max distance
south parallel
coast(m)
Max distance west from
point of dispersion (m)
Max distance East from point of
dispersion (m)
65-32.5 100 50 70 40 40
32.5-10 550 100 100 55 60
10-0.2 25000 160 170 65 80
0.2-0.1 50000 200 220 100 120
0.1-0 100000 350 430 140 200
Table 4.8: Distance to dilution of dredge dispersion at the time of Low tide Cycle-north
Number of Dilutions
Distance (m)
Sediment concentration
(g/l)
Max distance
north parallel
coast(m)
Max distance
south parallel
coast(m)
Max distance west from
point of dispersion (m)
Max distance East from point of
dispersion (m)
65-32.5 100 50 40 30 30
32.5-10 550 80 60 50 55
10-0.2 25000 110 75 60 65
0.2-0.1 50000 180 100 90 110
0.1-0 100000 250 1200 100 130
Figure 4.6: Dredge dispersion pattern during flooding tide (offshore)
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 228
Figure 4.7: Dredge dispersion pattern during high tide (offshore)
Figure 4.8: Dredge dispersion pattern during ebbing tide (offshore)
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 229
Figure 4.9: Dredge dispersion pattern during low tide (offshore)
Summary and Conclusion
During south west monsoon, the average velocity range is 0.1 – 0.2 m/s in the approach channel. The
low velocity attained inside the channel area is understood by the fact that the depth (-19.2m) is more
along the approach channel. During the peak flooding, the velocity in the areas adjacent to northern and
southern breakwaters inside harbour reaches a maximum of 0.65 m/s. Several prominent eddies along
the breakwater and berthing structures are formed due to the closed lagoon nature of the basin as well
the depth variations. Inside the harbour area (near both breakwaters) the un dredged portions are
experiencing the high velocity with the eddy formation which lead to the excessive siltation inside the
tranquil region. Maximum siltation at the rate of 0.3-0.35m/15 days is observed in the approach channel
outside the harbour area. Inside the harbour area, siltation of 0.15m/ 15 days is observed in the region
near northern breakwater. The approach channel inside the harbour area near southern breakwater is
mostly observed to be eroding at the rate of 0.25m/15 days.
As the magnitude of velocity is high, the nature of deposition is liable to frequent changes with constant
deposition along the regions of low magnitude of flow field. During the low tide, the entire harbour
region become devoid of currents and prominent eddies with some reversal currents with high velocity
up to about 0.7 m/s at the locations near northern and southern breakwaters inside harbour area. Due
to the sudden depth variations (lesser depths near the breakwaters & higher depths inside the approach
channel) and higher velocity, there is more siltation inside the tranquil area. Southern breakwater
attracts more sediment in the head at a rate of 0.3-0.4m/15 days, whereas, 0.1-0.2m/15 days erosion is
seen in the head of northern breakwater. Most prominently, erosion pattern is observed in the areas
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 230
south to southern breakwater whereas the accretion pattern of the range 0.1-0.2m/15 days is observed
near northern breakwater.
Similarly, during north east monsoon the current velocity in the areas adjacent to northern and southern
breakwaters inside harbour reaches a maximum of 0.65 m/s. The maximum magnitude of velocity
during peak flooding in the turning circle area is 0.1-0.2 m/s. Inside the harbour area (near both
breakwaters) the undredged portions are experiencing the high velocity (around 0.5- 0.65m/s) with the
eddy formation which lead to the excessive siltation inside the harbour region. During the low tide, the
entire harbour region become devoid of currents and prominent eddies with some reversal currents
with high velocity up to about 0.7 m/s at the locations near northern and southern breakwaters inside
harbour area. The overall current movement is more prominent adjacent to the breakwaters and near
the harbour entrance. The general direction of annual net-transport of sediment during north east
monsoon is towards south along the east coast of India. As opposed to the south west monsoon siltation
pattern, the approach channel outside the harbour area is observed to be stable and in some places, it is
eroding at the rate of 0.1-0.2m/15 days. Inside the harbour area, the area between approach channel
and northern breakwater is observed to be silting at the rate of 0.25m/15 days. The approach channel
inside the harbour area near southern breakwater is mostly observed to be eroding at the rate of
0.3m/15 days. Due to the sudden depth variations (lesser depths near the breakwaters & higher depths
inside the approach channel), there is more siltation inside the tranquil area.
In the case of north-east monsoon the dredge disposal location can be preferred in the south direction
to counteract the northern drift. The disposal site can be in 18°31'1.19"N, 84°20'45.87"E. The high
dilution is possible as the discharge quantity is very less and the water depth of discharge is 20 m. The
maximum distance to the dilution to attain the nearly ambient condition extends up to less than 800-
1000m. In the case of south-west monsoon the dumping ground can be preferably located in the north
direction to counteract the southern drift. The dredge disposal location can be fixed at a depth of 25m
contours. The disposal site can be in 18° 32'17.96"N, 84° 22'58.66"E. The maximum distance to the
dilution to attain the nearly ambient condition extends up to less than 300-500m.
4.3.2.2 Impact on Marine Environment
Marine water quality will get affected due to capital dredging and construction activities in the marine
waters. There will be increase in turbid level due to increase suspended sediment concentration. Due to
increase in turbidity, sunlight penetration will be less and dissolved oxygen levels will be decreased. Due
to dredging, benthic organisms will be removed in the area. Due to movement of mobile species, there
may be transfer of nutrients and chance of species diversity may be observed. Thus, capital dredging in
the proposed areas will have short-term and localised impact on marine environment. Noise due to
dredging and construction activities will have localised impact on marine ecology and this will be ceased
upon completion of construction activities.
Impact on Seawater and Seabed sediments: Resuspension of sediments in water leads to an
increase in the level of suspended solids and concentration of organic matter, possibly to toxic or
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 231
harmful levels. This will cause temporary impact to seawater quality near proposed offshore
structures’ location. Contaminated bottom sediments (contained with heavy metal concentration) may
lead to significant impact to seawater quality during dredging, piling etc. However, baseline data
suggests that there is no heavy metal concentration build up in the seabed sediments.
Impact on benthos: Piling and other water side construction will cause loss/displacement to bottom
habitat and its associated animal and plant life. Footprint on bottom habitat and associated life will be
limited to area of piling. The turbidity induced during driving of piles will also have impact on the
community structure and distribution of other marine life. However, the bottom will readily be
recolonized by replacement of benthic organisms within few seasons.
Fishes: One of the major impacts of pile driving operations on the marine organisms especially on fishes
is the underwater sound pressure waves generated during hammering of the piles. Pile driving may
result in 'agitation' of fish indicated by a change in swimming behaviour. For some species, the pile
driving operations may result in a disruption in their migratory pattern.
The various factors which are known to influence the impact on fish are: (i) size and force of
hammer strike; (ii) distance from the pile; (iii) depth of the water around the pile; (iv) depth at
which fish swim in water column; (v) entrapped air in the water; (vi) oscillation of water level, (vii)
geological composition of seabed, (viii) size of the fish; (ix) species of the fish; (x) presence of swim
bladder; (xi) physical condition of the fish and (xii) effectiveness of sound/pressure attenuation
technology used to minimize the impacts.
Plankton: The proposed project activity like piling may not have any direct bearing on plankton. It is
expected that the plankton will drift away from the disturbed area leading to minimal loss to
plankton. Further, compared to the abundance of the plankton in the site, the loss will be moderate and
temporary.
4.3.2.2.1 Mitigation Measures
Dredge management plan will be prepared and implemented
Proper dredging technique will be used to decrease turbidity levels.
Environmental Monitoring will be carried out throughout dredging period to check the
quality of marine environment compared to baseline data, if at all contamination is
observed, proper management plan will be adopted.
Construction boats will be equipped with collection of liquid / solid waste generated on
board.
Discharge of wastes into sea will be prohibited.
Spill control measures will be adopted.
Dredge material will be disposed at identified locations only as per model study
recommendations.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 232
IMPACT DUE TO TRANSPORT OF CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL
For construction of breakwaters of Bhavanapadu Port, about 1.0 Mm3 of stones required. Srikakulam
district (adjacent to the port area), Tekkali town which are in the vicinity of proposed Bhavanapadu port
location are having a number of stone quarries. The stone available in these quarries are suitable for
construction of Break water. Jarjangi in Narasannapeta mandal in Srikakulam district is about 30 km
away from the port location.
Tekkali is also full of stone mines consisting of stones/boulders usable for construction of break water.
This area is about 25 to 30 km away from the Port location. Coarse Aggregate for Concrete & Road
Metal are located in Srikakulam District. The contractor has to bring the materials from about 30 km
away to the port location. Concrete blocks can be fabricated locally.
Transportation of the construction material on the existing road network will have impact on air quality,
noise levels will be increased and accidents are likely to happened due to heavy vehicular movement.
4.3.3.1 Mitigation Measures
Vehicles carrying construction material shall be covered
If possible, village roads need to be avoided for heavy vehicle movement and connectivity
proposed from NH-16 shall be developed
Vehicles with Pollution Under Control (PUC) certificate shall be used for transportation of
construction material
IMPACT DUE TO LAND RECLAMATION
The dredged sediment has been proposed to use part of the dredged material of about 5.5 x 106 m3 for
land reclamation.
Capital dredge spoil will be utilized for land reclamation based on quality of dredge spoil. In order to
understand the characteristics and suitability of dredge spoil to use as reclamation material and thus to
reduce any impact on receiving environment a detailed sampling of seabed sediment has been
conducted.
Characteristics dredge spoil in terms of heavy metal concentration were analyzed and compared with
Schedule II of Hazardous and Other Wastes (Management and Transboundary Movement) Rules,
2016. Results show that the concentration of heavy metals are within permissible limits and can be used
as reclamation material without any adverse impact on soil environment.
4.3.4.1 Mitigation measures
In order to use as reclamation material a detailed sampling and analysis has been conducted (heavy
metal/toxicity check). Study found that dredge spoil can be safely used as a reclamation material
without any impact on receiving environment.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 233
Drainage: Drainage from waterfront areas, if allowed to flow unimpeded into the port it may lead to
contamination and water quality degradation. To the extent possible, the direct drainage from port to
sea shall be prevented. Surface runoff from stack yard area shall be directed to drainage channel
connecting settlement ponds (for settling down suspended load). Dry sweeping shall be practiced in
the port area.
IMPACT ON AIR ENVIRONMENT
Site preparation and construction of internal road, utilities, services, ancillary buildings and movement
of transport vehicles for materials and personnel etc., will generate dust. Emissions from DG sets,
construction equipment and transport vehicles will impact air quality in the surrounding areas.
The major source of air pollution in the proposed project is the increased vehicular movement and
fugitive dust emissions during project construction activity like loading, unloading of muck and its
transportation and DG set operation. The air pollution effect of excavation in ordinary earth and
boulders and also rock is directly dependent upon construction methodology, annual rate of excavation,
mode of transport within the construction site, mode of screening and method of crushing. The air
pollution sources at the proposed port site can be broadly classified into two categories, viz. Point
source and area source.
Ambient air quality at parameters such as SO2, NOx, and PM2.5 & PM10 found well within the permissible
limits prescribed by CPCB. Air emissions due to construction activities, fuel burning, vehicle movement,
machinery and DG sets are the most significant sources of air pollution during construction phase.
Air pollution can cause significant impacts on the environment, and subsequently on humans, animals,
vegetation and materials. It primarily affects the respiratory, circulatory and olfactory systems in
humans. In most cases, air pollution aggravates pre-existing diseases or degrades health status, making
people more susceptible to other infections or the development of chronic respiratory and
cardiovascular diseases.
Due to generation of dust, there will be increase in particulate matter generation and this is assessed
with the model studies and the details are as follows:
4.3.5.1 Air Dispersion Modelling
Dispersion modeling uses mathematical formulations to characterize the atmospheric processes that
disperse a pollutant emitted by a source. Based on emissions and meteorological inputs, a dispersion
model can be used to predict ambient concentration of air pollutants or toxins emitted from sources at
selected downwind receptor locations. They are most useful for pollutants that are dispersed over large
distances and that may react in the atmosphere.
The dispersion modelling was carried out using the latest versions of the US EPA air dispersion
model – AERMOD View-9.6. The prediction of the Ground Level Concentrations (GLCs) due to the
activity has been computed by AERMOD version 9.6 as per CPCB guidelines.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 234
AERMOD ready-modelled meteorological data using WRF mesoscale model as a direct input for
AERMOD View_V.9.6 for one season was obtained from primary data.
AERMOD View 9.6. is developed by USEPA and authorized by CPCB is used for air modelling
simulation which is based on the steady state Gaussian Plume Equation.
4.3.5.2 Methodology
The AERMOD modelling system consists of one main program (AERMOD) and two pre-processors
(AERMET and AERMAP). AERMOD uses terrain, boundary layer and source data to model pollutant
transport and dispersion for calculating temporally averaged air pollution concentrations.
Onsite hourly meteorological data will be generated by WRF (weather research and forecast) model.
The model domain will be identified based on the project study area.
The output of the WRF model (SFC and PFL file) will be feed as the input to AERMOD model.
These meteorological parameters from WRF model (wind speed, wind direction, rainfall,
temperature, humidity, pressure, ceiling height, global horizontal radiation and cloud cover) will be
prepared in columns and temporal resolution will be prepared in rows of a spreadsheet. This
spreadsheet will be processed in WRF/AERMET model which is a pre-processor of AERMOD.
The terrain data at 90m resolution of Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) was selected in
AERMAP which is also the pre-processor of AERMOD. This will provide a physical relationship
between terrain features and the behaviour of air pollution plumes and also generates location and
height data for each receptor location.
AERMOD is used to model air quality in this study for prediction of pollutants concentration from
Construction and Operation emissions.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 235
Figure 4.10: Methodology adopted for Air Dispersion Modelling Study
4.3.5.3 Prediction of Impacts and Sources
Ports are the back-bone of economic development, which drives country economy. It generates
employment and creates market demands for other sectors but it generates environmental pollution
and compels regulatory agency to formulate environmental policy, comply environmental conditions
and implement Environmental Management Plan to reduce pollution in construction and operation
stages of project.
In the proposed project the DG sets will be installed to provide back up of electricity in case of power
failure. Heavy vehicle (road truck loader) are the sources of air pollution along with DG sets during
construction and operation phases of project.
Sources of pollutants due to proposed project depends on:
Fugitive Emission from loading unloading activity
Emissions of pollutants from truck movement
Emission from D.G. Sets
DG sets:
In the proposed project the emissions from DG set operation during construction and operation stages is
considered as Point source in order to assess the impact on air environment. The impact was predicted
over a radial distance of 10,000m around the proposed site and at various sampling locations.
Ground Level Concentrations (GLC) was calculated over the study area in all directions to predict impact
of DG set emissions in Cartesian coordinates (X, Y) to have better prediction of model results at various
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 236
locations representing project site, human settlements, commercial area and sensitive areas if present
in the study area.
A DG sets of capacity 2000 KVA x 1No and 500 KVA x 1 No. during Operation Phase and 1 Nos. of 500
KVA and 1No.of 1000 kVA Capacity during Construction Phase were considered to calculate the emission
inventory as given in the below Table 4.9.
Truck/Traffic Movement (Paved)
PM, NO2, SO2 and CO are major pollutants released from traffic/truck movement. The concentration
decreases with the increase in distance from the polluting source. Traffic movement and vehicles used
inside the premises are sources of vehicular pollution.
20 trucks in continuous was considered during Construction Phase for General Cargo for Loading and
Unloading of muck/dredge material. The Cargo transportation by Truck of 45 ton capacity on paved road
was considered.
2 trucks at a time was considered during Construction Phase for General Cargo for Loading and
Unloading of muck/dredge material. The Cargo transportation by Truck of 45 ton capacity on paved road
was considered.
It is anticipated that the contribution of vehicular emissions is major, Pollution under Control (PUC)
Certified vehicles shall be used which has low pollution due to traffic movement.
Loading and Unloading
Loading and unloading activity for dredge material from the berth area during construction phase is
considered. Loading and unloading of general cargo and coal cargo during operation phase is
considered. During this activity fugitive emissions are generated.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 237
4.3.5.4 Meteorology
Figure 4.11: Primary Windrose for monsoon season
Micro-meteorology of the area shows that South-westerly is dominant winds in the study area in
monsoon Season.
4.3.5.5 Receptor Location
Ambient Air Quality Monitoring (AAQ) baseline sampling locations were selected for Air Dispersion
Modelling as shown in below Figure 4.12.
The figure depicts 10 km radius google image considered for air dispersion modelling which shows the
receptor/baseline sampling locations.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 238
Figure 4.12 : Air Modelling Receptor Location
4.3.5.6 Emission Calculation and Input Data
The AP-42, Vol. I, 3.3: Gasoline and Diesel Industrial Engines and The AP-42, 13.2.1 Paved Roads is
referred for emission factor calculation as given in the below Table 4.9. The stack height is considered as
per the standard CPCB guidelines.
Table 4.9 : Emission Calculation Input Data for Air Dispersion Modeling
Particulars Stack Height
(m)
Stack dia (m)
Stack Temp (°C)
Stack Velocity
(m/s)
Emission Factor
NOx (g/sec)
PM10 (g/sec)
PM2.5 (g/sec)
SO2 (g/sec)
CO (g/sec)
2000 KVA 30 0.3 477 8.1 1.1 0.4 0.1 0.4 1.2
1000 KVA 30 0.3 575 8.3 0.46 0.16 0.05 0.15 0.50
500 KVA 30 0.25 523 8.1 0.184 0.065 0.019 0.06 0.198
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 239
Particulars Stack Height
(m)
Stack dia (m)
Stack Temp (°C)
Stack Velocity
(m/s)
Emission Factor
NOx (g/sec)
PM10 (g/sec)
PM2.5 (g/sec)
SO2 (g/sec)
CO (g/sec)
Loading
Operation Phase – Coal
Cargo
- - - - 1.69E-06 5.07E-08 - -
Unloading - - - - 5.14E-09 1.54E-10 - -
Paved Roads
- - - 6.7E-09 4.09E-04 4.09E-05 1.32E-
10 1.16E-
08
Loading Operation
Phase – General Cargo
- - - - 5.69E-07 1.70E-08 - -
Unloading - - - - 8.07E-09 2.42E-10 - -
Paved Roads
- - - 7.1E-11 6.29E-05 6.29E-06 1.41E-
12 1.24E-
10
Loading Construction
Phase – General Cargo
- - - - 1.70E-07 5.12E-09 - -
Unloading - - - - 3.02E-09 9.07E-11 - -
Paved Roads
- - - 8.012E-
07 4.70E-06 4.70E-07
1.57E-08
1.383E-06
By using the above-mentioned emission factors and input data, ground level concentrations have been
estimated to know the incremental rise in ambient air quality and impact in the study area.
The effect of air pollutants upon receptors are influenced by concentration of pollutants and their
dispersion in the atmosphere.
Air quality modelling is an important tool for prediction, planning and evaluation of air pollution control
activities besides identifying the requirements for emission control to meet the regulatory standards
and to apply mitigation measures to reduce impact caused by project activities.
4.3.5.7 Model Option Computation and Frame Work
The plume rise is estimated by Briggs formulae, but the final rise is always limited to that of the
mixing layer;
Stack tip down-wash is not considered;
Calms processing routine is used by default;
Wind profile exponents is used by default;
Flat and Elevated terrain is used for computations;
It is assumed that the pollutants do not undergo any physico-chemical transformation and that
there is no pollutant removal by dry deposition;
Washout by rain is not considered; and
Cartesian co-ordinate system has been used for computations.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 240
Uniform polar receptor grid is used.
While performing the model the urban dispersion and regulatory defaults options were selected as
per guidelines on air quality models (PROBES/70/1997-1998).
The hourly surface data consisted of wind speed, wind direction, ambient temperature, cloud cover,
and ceiling height. Whereas, the upper air data consisted of atmospheric pressure, heights,
temperature, dew point temperature, wind speed, and wind direction.
The data arrangement resulted in the forms of SFC File (*.SFC) and PFL File (*.PFL).
For the Quantitative Impact Analysis on the air quality due to the construction and operational
activity of the proposed project, Air Dispersion Modelling is performed.
The criteria pollutants considered for the purpose of dispersion modelling using AERMOD consist of
PM10, PM2.5, SO2. NOx and CO.
4.3.5.8 Model Results
AERMOD view 9.6.1 make was used to calculate incremental concentration of different parameters.
Combined impact of PM10, PM2.5, NO2, SO2 and CO was considered due to DG set activity, Truck
transportation, loading and unloading in construction and Operation Phase.
Construction Phase:
The output AERMOD images are shown in the below Figure 4.13 to Figure 4.17 for Construction Phase.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 241
Figure 4.13: Spatial Distribution 24 hrs maximum
incremental GLC of the PM10 in μg/m3
Figure 4.14: Spatial Distribution 24 hrs maximum incremental GLC of the PM2.5 in μg/m3
Incremental Ground Level Concentrations for PM10
During the construction phase; maximum GLC for
the Particulate Matter in 24hr was found to be 8.97
ug/m^3.
Incremental Ground Level Concentrations for
PM2.5
During the construction phase; maximum GLC for
the Particulate Matter in 24hr was found to be
0.931 ug/m^3.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 242
Figure 4.15: Spatial Distribution 24 hrs maximum incremental GLC of the NO2 in μg/m3
Figure 4.16: Spatial Distribution 24 hrs maximum incremental GLC of the SO2 in μg/m3
Incremental Ground Level Concentrations for NO2
During the construction phase; maximum GLC for
the Nitrogen Oxide in 24hr was found to be 17.7
ug/m^3.
Incremental Ground Level Concentrations for SO2
During the construction phase; maximum GLC for
the Sulphur Dioxide in 24hr was found to be 1.15
ug/m^3.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 243
Figure 4.17: Spatial Distribution 24 hrs maximum incremental GLC of the CO in μg/m3
Incremental Ground Level Concentrations for CO
During the construction phase the maximum GLC for the Carbon Monoxide in 24hr was found to be 161
μg/m3 (4.299 ug/m^3).
Operation Phase:
The output AERMOD images are shown in Figure 6 to Figure 10 for Operation Phase.
To be worked out after the final DPR
The 24 Hourly average maximum Incremental Concentration Prediction for AAQ sampling locations is
given in Table 4.10.
Table 4.10 : Predicted maximum incremental GLC of all pollutants (μg/m3)
Phase PM10
(μg/m3) PM2.5
(μg/m3) NOx
(μg/m3) SO2
(μg/m3) CO
(μg/m3)
Construction Phase 8.97 0.931 17.7 1.15 4.299 (0.00499 mg/m3)
Operation Phase ? ? ? ? ?
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 244
Table 4.11 : 24 Hourly Incremental Concentration Prediction during Construction Phase
AAQ
Locatio
n
Maximum Baseline Data (µg/m3)
Predicted 24 Hourly Maximum Concentration (µg/m3)
Resultant 24 Hourly Maximum Concentration (µg/m3)
PM1
0
PM2.
5
NO
2 SO2 CO
PM1
0
PM2.
5
NO
2 SO2 CO
PM1
0
PM2.
5
NO
2 SO2
C
O
AAQ- 1 34.6 36.4 13.
4
12.
2
<1.
0 0.90
0.30
0 3.0
0.0
8
1.00
0 35.5 36.7
16.
4
12.2
8
2.
0
AAQ- 2 42.1 25.7 13.
9
13.
4
<
1.0 0.50
0.05
0 0.8
0.0
8
0.20
0 42.6
25.7
5
14.
7
13.4
8
1.
2
AAQ- 3 40.6 24.9 14.
1
14.
4
<
1.0 0.70
0.07
0 0.2
0.0
3
0.20
0 41.3
24.9
7
14.
3
14.4
3
1.
2
AAQ- 4 34.0 20.7 13.
1
13.
0
<
1.0 0.50
0.05
0 0.3
0.0
3
0.20
0 34.5
20.7
5
13.
4
13.0
3
1.
2
AAQ- 5 29.6 26.8 14.
0
13.
0
<
1.0 0.50
0.05
0 0.6
0.0
5
0.20
0 30.1
26.8
5
14.
6
13.0
5
1.
2
4.3.5.9 Conclusion
Construction Phase:
From the above Table it is said that
The resultant concentration range for PM10 ranges from 30.1 to 42.6 ug/m3, PM2.5 ranges from 20.75
to 36.7 ug/m3,, NO2 ranges from 13.4 to 16.4 ug/m3, SO2 ranges from 12.28 to 14.43 ug/m3, CO
ranges from 1.2 to 2 ug/m3 and the same are well within the permissible limits as per CPCB
standards for NAAQ.
Operation Phase:
The resultant concentration range for PM10 ranges from 30.1 to 42.6 ug/m3, PM2.5 ranges from 20.75
to 36.7 ug/m3,, NO2 ranges from 13.4 to 16.4 ug/m3, SO2 ranges from 12.28 to 14.43 ug/m3, CO
ranges from 1.2 to 2 ug/m3 and the same are well within the permissible limits as per CPCB
standards for NAAQ.
Since the DG sets will be used as back up of power in case of power failure it is concluded that impact of
DG sets is not significant on Ambient Air Quality.
Traffic movement and vehicles used for transportation of dredge material are sources of vehicular
pollution. Impact on human settlements due to traffic movement at the proposed port site is
considerable in construction and operation phase. The Pollution under Control (PUC) Certified vehicles
would be used which has low pollution due to traffic movement.
When the Highest 1st Incremental values for PM10, PM2.5, SO2 and NO2 are superimposed on the
maximum baseline values of the discrete receptors i.e. monitoring locations it is observed that all values
are below the NAAQM standards for both during construction and operation phase.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 245
In other words, the incremental value (Model output) of the specific pollutant at the particular
monitoring station is added to the baseline value of that specific pollutant measured during the
monitoring period of the project. The Resultant Value thus calculated used for predicting the impacts of
the proposed project on the air environment in the study area is not exceeding the NAAQ Limit.
4.3.5.9.1 Mitigation Measures
The Contractor must take all reasonable steps to minimize dust nuisance during the construction of the
Works.
Thus, following mitigation measures are recommended:
Loading and unloading of muck and other material in covered shed.
Providing dust suppression system in unloading area.
Developing avenue and curtain plantation on the internal roads and peripheral plantation
around the site to protect the movement of dust and other pollutants.
Cover scaffolding, hosing down road surfaces and cleaning of vehicles.
Vehicles having pollution under control certificate will be allowed to ply.
Use of covering sheets for trucks to prevent dust dispersion from the trucks.
Reducing the speed of a vehicle to 20 km/hr to reduce emissions on site.
All material storages will be adequately covered and contained.
Best practices for maintenance and repair of all vehicles.
Procedure for regular monitoring should be installed to ensure that emissions from DG sets are
well below the prescribed emission standards for DG sets.
Adequate stack height for DG set as per CPCB norms shall be provided.
IMPACTS DUE TO NOISE AND GROUND VIBRATION
The main noise generating source during mechanized port operation and related activities during
construction phase are from drilling, blasting of rock strata, operation of heavy earth moving machinery
like excavators, loaders, and back-hoe and FE loaders besides transport vehicles movement to and from
site to stone crushing unit inside port back up area/boundary or to the harbour area. Blasting is
envisaged in the port/harbour area bas rocky strata is observed during the bore hole study. However,
blasting is an integral part of port and apart from creating impulsive noise it results in ground vibration.
The noise monitoring shows that day and night time noise levels at the Port backup area and exterla
connectivity pf the port site, which are in rural setup, and the surrounding rural settlement are within
the prescribed limits as no anthropogenic activities were witnessed during the study period.
4.3.6.1 Impact on Noise Level
A cumulative effect of port and harbour activities generates enormous noise and vibration in the port
area during the construction phase and its surrounding areas. Prolonged exposure to high noise levels
over a period of years invariably causes permanent damage to the auditory nerve and/or its sensory
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 246
components (Banerjee and Chakraborty,2006; Krishna Murthy et al,). Their reversible damage,
commonly referred as noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL), is the commonest occupational diseases
amongst the mine workers especially at such mining sites which have multiple noise sources. Besides
this the fauna of surrounding area is also affected by noise as the wildlife is more sensitive to noise and
vibration than the human beings (Mathur,2005).
Noise Due to Drilling
The drilling is contemplated to be carried out by DTH drills with compressor which entail a noise level
of 88.0 Db (A) and will be a worst-case scenario. Nonetheless, the noise generated dust to drilling is
within the standards prescribed by Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) for 8-hour
exposure i.e. 90 dB(A). It is worth mentioning here that Port and harbour shall be carried in a shift of 8
hours and the equivalent noise level exposure during the shift shall be less than the safety limit of 90
dB(A).
Noise due to excavation and transportation
Noise generated due to deployment of rock breaker, excavators, loaders and dump trucks are shown in
Table 4.12.
Table 4.12: Machinery vs Noise Levels
Sr. No. Machinery/ Activity Noise Produced in dB(A) at 50 ft. from source*
1. Excavator/Shovel 80
2. Front end loader 85
3. Dump Truck/ Tippers (at full throttle) 92
4. Near Haul roads (while dumpers are moving) 88
5. Dozer (when dozing) 102
6. Drill machine (when hole collar drilling) 104
7. Drill machine (after 3m drilling) 103
8. Crusher (outside crusher cabin) 100
9. Crusher (inside crusher cabin) 86
4.3.6.2 Mitigation Measures
• Noise mitigation by adopting suitable techniques such as acoustic enclosures, insulation and
vibration dampers.
• Piling and drilling shall be carried out in non peak hours to reduce high noise levels.
• Personnel shall be provided with protective gear like earplugs, muffs, etc. especially
construction personnel involved in pile driving operations.
• Periodic maintenance of the equipment shall be carried out to minimise noise emissions.
• Haul roads within the port site and outside shall be fenced to avoid excessive noise levels from
Engine acceleration and deceleration
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 247
IMPACT ON WATER QUALITY
The primary concerns relating to water quality associated with construction activities are pointed out
below:
Reclamation using dredge material will increase turbidity and suspended sediment
concentration in groundwater if it is not properly carried out.
Runoff related to unpaved and excavated areas during the rain shower.
Sediments transported to runoff from the construction site.
Run off related to area where lubricant, fuel other materials are stored, used and disposed,
off.
The surface water quality might be affected with the discharge of the runoff from the project site. The
impact to the surface water bodies could arise from the increased soil erosion from excavated site only
causing increase in the suspended particles and turbidity of runoff water from the site. However, this
impact would be temporary in the nature and would be observed in first rain only and as soon as rain is
over excavated soil at site would be stabilized. Therefore, the surface water quality during rains would
be impacted marginally for very short duration.
4.3.7.1 Mitigation Measures for Construction Phase
The impact on water quality during construction phase was minimized by adopting following measures;
Dredged material shall not be used directly for reclamation, it shall be dumped at designated
area bunded well and after draining out the supernatant water, sand shall be used for
reclamation
Excavation during dry season and proper management of excavated soils,
Clearing all debris from site as soon as construction is over.
By providing proper hutment and toilet facilities for construction labour
Through the proper disposal of sullage generated at site
IMPACT ON MANGROVES
Mangroves are observed on the banks of Tekkali creek located towards north of port site. Also the
road/rail corridor shall encompass some mangrove patches in the crossings of the water course. The
port boundary superimposed on approved CZMP as per CRZ notification, 2011 is given in Figure 4.18.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 248
Figure 4.18: Port boundary on CZMP
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 249
From the above figure, it is evident some patches of mangroves are falling near northern boundary and
as per CRZ notification, 50m green buffer will be provided and no activity will be undertaken in that area
falling in the port boundary. Mangrove conservation plan is prepared and addressed in EMP chapter for
the areas falling within road/rail corridor.
4.3.8.1 Mitigation measures
Discharge of toxic/hazardous materials during the port construction and operation would not
be allowed
Illegal cutting of mangroves for firewood by the people would be prevented
Mangrove plantation will be carried out in the degraded areas.
The water quality near the mangrove area will be ensured by adopting suitable mitigation
measures.
4.4 OPERATION PHASE IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES
IMPACT ON SHORELINE
The construction of a shore connected structure often leads to changes in the shoreline in terms of
erosion or accretion. This study on the shoreline due to presence of the shore-connected structures was
conducted to under stand the changes anticipated. Numerical models offer the capability to study the
effect of the wave characteristics, structure dimensions and other associated parameters in providing
reasonable estimates of the shoreline response. As the ocean waves approaches the near shore it
undergoes transformations like shoaling, refraction, diffraction and breaking. The phenomena of wave
breaking throw sediments to the surface due to the turbulence generated. The sediments in suspension
are then driven by the wave-induced currents. Since the direction of waves in the near shore is oblique,
the currents induced by them have two components. One along the shore called longshore current
mainly responsible for the long shore sediment transport, which plays an important role in the shoreline
changes especially due to the shore connected structures. The other component is in the direction
normal to the shore, in which case, the mode of sediment transport is called onshore-offshore sediment
transport. When a structure normal to the shoreline is constructed, it will intercept the free passage of
longshore sediment transport, which results an imbalance in the quantity of sediment in the near shore
especially near the structure. This leads to accretion on the up drift side and erosion on the down drift
side of the structure.
The numerical model to predict the shoreline evolution due to the shore-connected structures has been
used to predict the shoreline changes due to the proposed Breakwaters and Groins. The wave
characteristics given as the input to the numerical model given in Table 4.13
Table 4.13: Wave characteristics for the present study
Month Deep water wave
direction (θo) w.r.t North
Wave height,
H(m)
Wave period,
T(sec)
January 53 0.7 5.5
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 250
Month Deep water wave
direction (θo) w.r.t North
Wave height,
H(m)
Wave period,
T(sec)
February 169 0.7 7.3
March 176 1 5.2
April 212 0.7 6.1
May 209 1.2 6.2
June 205 1.4 7
July 214 1.4 7.5
August 208 1.3 7
September 185 1.2 6.4
October 172 1 6.4
November 138 0.7 5.6
December 60 0.9 5.2
The length of the Breakwaters, water depth at the end of them and the present status of the shore are
to be given as the input to the numerical model.
The numerical model was executed for the most frequently occurring wave characteristics for the
different months as stated earlier. The result on the predicted shoreline variations over years are
projected in Figure 4.20. The shoreline prediction has been made at the end of 1 year, 5years, 10years,
15 years, 20 years and 25 years after the construction of the Breakwaters and groins and has been
presented by superimposing the shoreline patterns.
From the shoreline evolution studies, the influence due to the construction of the breakwater will be
upto 2 to 2.5 times the perpendicular distance of the breakwater. The length of the northern
breakwater is about 580m and so the effect due to the construction of breakwater will be of the order
of 1.5km. The creek is located 3km away from the northern breakwater and the orientation of the
shoreline near the creek mouth is about 38 degree towards the north compared to the shoreline
orientation along the proposed harbour, from which it is understood that the construction of
breakwater at a distance of 3km from the creek and due to the change in the shoreline orientation,
there won’t be change in the shoreline dynamics of the creek. The location of the northern breakwater
and the distance of the northern breakwater from the creek is shown in Figure 4.19.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 251
Figure 4.19: Location and distance of Northern breakwater from the creek
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 252
Figure 4.20: Shoreline evolution
IMPACT ON MARINE ENVIRONMENT
Due to cargo vessels, tugs and port crafts movement, there are chances of aqueous discharges from the
vessels such as dumping of ship wastes, bilge water, solid wastes, etc. if not regulated. Further, spills
during loading/unloading, fuelling of ships, cargo dust etc. will also impact the marine water and
sediment quality in the port basin. In addition, land-based sources of pollution such as runoff from
berths, storage areas, sewage from the port facilities, would also affect the marine environment.
4.4.2.1 Mitigation Measures
In order to mitigate the impacts on marine water quality the following measures will be followed:
Stormwater drainage system will be provided. The drainage system for berthing and backup
area will be planned comprising storm water and other wastewater.
The residual water generated due to the sprinkling activities on the cargo will be collected into
the liquid waste network.
The liquid waste network will have suitably located oil-water separators, settlement traps,
collection pits etc.
Sewage will be collected and conveyed to Sewage Treatment Plant (STP) units near port
operational area and near cluster of main operational buildings. Treated Sludge will be used in
greenbelt development.
Floor washings of equipment workshops will be conveyed through an oil-water separator and
subsequently treated at STP. Treated wastewater will be re-used in greenbelt.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 253
Stockpile runoff will be managed. The storm runoff and the runoff generated due to sprinkling
at berth and stockyard will be conveyed through settlement traps and collection pits where the
iron ore and coal particles and any other solid particles would be separated from the stream.
Discharge of wastes into sea will be prohibited. Discharges of wastes, dumping of ship wastes
(sullage / sewage), bilge water, solid wastes, etc. will be prohibited as per MARPOL Convention.
Spill control equipment such as booms and barriers will be provided for containment and
skimmers will be provided for recovery. As accidental spills will be in harboured waters, it will
not spread spatially and response time for shutting down fuelling, containment and recovery
will be very fast.
Pollution control facilities would be designed with a possibility of recycling the wastes especially
the treated wastewater.
LITTORAL DRIFT
The Bhavanapadu coast is exposed to littoral drift and the predominant direction of sediment
movement is from south to north during south west monsoon season and the sediment movement
reverses from north to south during north east monsoon season. The shoreline changes due to
construction of breakwaters and associated sedimentation/siltation due to littoral drift in the approach
channel and harbour basin have been studied are presented in section 4.4.1.
IMPACT ON AIR QUALITY
4.4.4.1 Mitigation Measures
During operational phase, dust generation will emit from handling, loading, unloading and storage of
coal, cement and other bulk cargo commodities. Dust suppression system has to be provided to control
the dust.
Water sprinkler system covering the stack yard and wharf shall be provided. Water sprinkling
after the event of commodities loading/unloading shall be ensured.
Continuous monitoring of air quality should be done and displayed.
Development of green belt surrounding the port area shall be ensured.
Compliance with Andhra Pradesh Pollution Control Board guidelines on handling, storage and
transport of commodities like coal etc. shall be ensured.
Periodic water sprinkling in high dust areas inside the port to be carried out.
Vehicle with valid PUC certificate shall only be allowed inside the Port premises for operations.
Detailed vehicle/ Truck management plan shall be developed and its recommendations shall
be strictly adhered to minimize impact due to material transport.
Fugitive work emission in the work area (wharf, stack yard etc.) shall be monitored. Emission
shall conform to the standards prescribed by authorities such as Directorate of Industrial
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 254
Health and Safety.
Adequate stack height for DG set as per CPCB norms shall be provided.
From the risk point of view and also from the Environment Mitigation aspect the following
Precautions to be followed for Coal Storage in the Port.
Different grades of Coal shall not be stacked together.
The pile height shall be limited at 15 m.
Inert Gas system shall be provided in coal stack yard for safety as per engineering feasibility.
Water mist system must be activated when ambient temp exceeds 43°C (this will minimize
spontaneous ignition). This option or other relevant safety measures as per engineering
Feasibility to be implemented.
As a rule, first come first go system should be followed for coal storage.
Fire Hydrant system must be checked and kept operationally ready.
During the operation phase, substantial Vehicular Movement is expected resulting in air pollution, if not
mitigated/regulated. In addition, emissions from DG set stacks during power failure will also need to be
reduced. Hence, following measures will be adopted for pollution control in the project:
DG Set: The running of DG sets will result in emission of various pollutants. To achieve adequate
natural dispersion, stack height will be provided to DG sets respectively in accordance with the
guidelines of Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB).
Traffic pollution management: Internal roads would be maintained in good conditions to
control the dust emissions. Awareness will be raised amongst the employees for use of low
sulphur fuel.
IMPACT ON NOISE
For an approximate estimation of dispersion of noise in the ambient air from the point source, a
standard mathematical model for sound wave propagation is used. The noise generated by equipment
decreases with increased distance from the source due to wave divergence. An additional decrease in
sound pressure level with distance from the source is expected due to atmospheric effect or its
interaction with objects in the transmission path.
For hemispherical sound wave propagation through homogenous loss free medium, one can estimate
noise levels at various locations, due to different source using model based on first principles, as per the
following equation:
LP2=LP1 – 20Log (r2 / r1) - AE ……………………………. (1)
Where,
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 255
LP2 and L P1 are the Sound Pressure Levels (SPL) at points located at a distance of r2 and r1 from the
source. AE is attenuations due to Environmental conditions (E). The combined effect of the entire source
can be determined at various locations by the following equation.
LP (total) = 10Log (10 (Lpa)/10 + 10 Lpb)/10 + 10 Lpc)/10 + ………) (2)
Where Lpa, LPb, LPc are noise pressure levels at a point due to different sources.
Environment Correction (AE)
The equivalent sound pressure level can be calculated from the measured sound pressure level (Leq
measured) averaged over the measurement surface area ‘S’ and from corrections K1 and K2 and is given
by;
(Leq measured) = (Leq measured) – K1 – K2 (3)
Where,
K1 = Factor for the background noise correction. The correction was not applied in this modelling
exercise, as it was not possible to measure the background noise levels by putting off machines hence it
was considered as zero.
K2 = Environmental correction
In the present study Dhwani PRO Version 3.6, a noise propagation modelling software developed to
undertake construction, industrial and traffic noise propagation studies. A variety of scenarios can be
created quickly in Dhwani PRO, allowing the user to determine the impact of changing the source, layout
and adding /removing the effects of shielding due to noise mitigation devices such as barriers.
4.4.5.1 Input for Model for sound wave propagation
4.4.5.1.1 Base Map, Point Source and Receptors
Base maps identifying the location of the site, noise sources, receptors and other important
characteristics of the surrounding area is the foremost requirement. In this study jpeg raster maps
created in Google map showing the locations of the harbour and port and port backup area has been
captured and imported for registering the map and setting up of the scale. The point source is the
location where the earth mover equipment i.e. the point source of noise is to be operated. Since the
port and harbour are contiguous to one another and the construction and operations shall be carried
out simultaneously in all of them, the machinery and other equipment / crusher shall be constituting
sole source for each of the activity area. The receptors are the nearby settlements and also the point
located in the port backup area where the impact of propagation of noise is to be evaluated
4.4.5.1.2 Hourly noise level
Hourly nose levels observed for 24 hours at different point sources and other receptors have been
observed and adopted in studies. In the present case the receptors have been selected at ten based on
the activity and areas identified nearest settlements to the Harbour and Port backup area as well as at
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 256
the boundary and within 1000 m. The noise levels to be generated intermittently due to running of
mining equipment for different hours have also been incorporated. Besides this, the background level at
the receptors have been entered into the corresponding windows.
4.4.5.1.3 Standard Values of Noise Levels of Construction and Operation Equipment
As per DGMS, a noise level of 90 dBA is stipulated in Port and Harbour area where HEMMs are to be
operated. In order to assess the worst-case noise levels in around the mining lease, a combined noise
source having cumulative equivalent noise reference level of 120 dBA is considered to be located within
the Harbour area and then with respect to the activity areas such as ROW in forest for road connectivity,
Coal Stack yard. Railway connectivity and demolition activity in Mulapeta the noise reference level of 80,
85 and 100 dBA are considered within the Port area.
4.4.5.2 Model outputs
After running the model, output in the tabular form showing the estimated noise levels at different
receptors owing to the impact of running of mining machinery has been generated.
Table 4.14: Modelling Output
Village Receiver
Overall
Resultant
Level dB(A)
Background
Noise Level
dB(A)
x y Distance
(m)
Project site Harbour area North
boundary Receiver-1 34.5 51.24 2052836.0 219525.1 1500
Project Site Harbour area South
boundary Receiver-2 36.9 53.42 2050563.44 216759.0 2000
Port Backup area near Salt Pan Receiver-3 38.2 48.37 2052457.6 217241.8 1300
Entry and exit for Road and Rail
corridor Receiver-4 32.0 47.80 2054041.2 220000.8 2000
Mullapetta Receiver-5 51.2 53.43 2051797.2 217741.2 1000
Pathalingadu Receiver-6 42.0 44.76 2051226.1 216336.4 2000
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 257
Figure 4.15: Modelling Output
4.4.5.2.1 Inference
It is evident from the results that the noise level of 102 dB (A) at project site source gets highly
attenuated to 32.0 dB (A) at the boundary of the Port back up area. The estimated noise levels at the
receptors located Project site Harbour area North boundary, Project Site Harbour area South boundary,
Port Backup area near Salt Pan, Entry and exit for Road and Rail corridor, Mulapeta and Pathalingdu
where the Port backup area activity is proposed. The incremental noise levels due to running of
machinery shall be 34.5, 36.9, 38.2, 32.0, 51.2 and 42.0 dB (A), which are less than the baseline. Further
the existing background noise levels are ranging from 44.76 dB (A) to 53.43 B (A). Therefore, it can be
categorically stated that the noise impact due to Port operations during Construction phase and
Operation phase on working environment shall be relatively significant within the port activity area ,
whereas there shall be insignificant impact on the nearby settlements as none of the settlements fall
within the port backup area. The Two villages Mulapetta and Pathaligadu will be resettled outside the
port back up area.
4.4.5.3 Mitigation Measures to Reduce Ambient Noise Levels
The following control measures will be adopted to keep the ambient noise levels below permissible
limits.
In case of Bhavanapadu port, The Afforestation land with Casuarina Plantations which is the
green buffer (width ranging from 100 m to 300 m) between Harbour and immediate port
backup area and the backup area which will be untouched will provide noise absorbing barrier
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 258
for activities within the immediate port backup area thereby reducing the noise levels less than
envisaged by the stimulation of Noise model Dhawani PRO version 3.6.
Further to the existing green belt due to forest land and afforestation of Casuarina plantations,
Provision and maintenance of thick tree belts to screen noise all along the boundary of Port and
coal stack yard has been planned.
Avenue plantation within the project area will also further dampen the noise impact.
Proper maintenance of noise generating transport vehicles shall be complied during
construction and operation phases.
Regular noise level monitoring shall be carried out periodically for taking corrective action and
reporting will be
Provision of protective devices like ear muffs/ear plugs to those workers who cannot be
isolated from the source of noise will be provided by the Contractor and OH&SAS 18001 will be
implemented during construction and Operation phase
Reducing the exposure time of workers to the higher noise levels by rotation.
Staggering operations of noisy equipment’s will be practised during peak construction period
and Operation period.
IMPACT ON WATER QUALITY
The polluted runoff from berths and stockpiles of cargo storage areas will be intercepted and directed to
settling ponds with a retention period of 3 to 4 hours. After settling, the ponds will be used to supply
water to the dust suppression system. The runoff from uncontaminated areas will be discharged into the
greenbelt area. Runoff from cargo storage areas will be directed to settling ponds through concrete
channels and the retention time of each settling pond is 3 hours.
Number of retention tanks: 3
Capacity of each tank: 420 m3
Length of each tank: 15m
Breadth of each tank: 8m
Depth of setting tank (D) = 3.5 m
The oil contaminated water will be sent to oil water separator, separated oil will be sent to APPCB
approved vendors and water will be sent STP for further treatment. The treated water will be used for
green belt development. The surface water may get polluted in terms of suspended solids, heavy metals
etc. as these pollutants may enter these water systems through diffused locations on coal/bulk cargo
stack yards.
4.4.6.1 Mitigation Measures
The storage area will be provided with drainage system so that the contaminated water from
the stockyard area does not flow directly into the natural water bodies or into the groundwater
system.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 259
The sewerage system will be provided to collect the sewage from port administration building;
canteen and operation buildings and it will be treated in sewage treatment plant.
The water quality of the surface water must be monitored for any sources of contamination
and best possible care will be taken to protect the surface water resources in the area.
All steps will be taken to avoid spillage of bulk cargo, oil and other materials into the river.
Slope of the bulk cargo storage facility will be towards landward side to avoid storm water
draining into the river.
Runoff will be collected in a sump and allowed to settle. An oil separator will be installed prior to
the sump to arrest oil and grease from entering into the sump. Clear water from the sump will
be allowed to overflow to the existing storm water drain of ultimate disposal. In addition, to
prevent or minimize storm water pollution appropriate storm water pollution prevention plan
(SWPPP) will be developed. SWPPP will be specific, because every unit is unique with source,
type and volume of contaminated storm water discharge.
Bulk cargo area will be paved and made impermeable for any leachate to percolate to the
subsurface water table.
All vessels will be sized such that adequate clearance is maintained between vessels and the
riverbed in all tide conditions, to ensure that undue turbidity is not generated by turbulence
from vessel movement or propeller wash. No vessels will be allowed to discharge their garbage
in the river. Such garbage should be disposed off in the shore bins available at jetties.
The decks of all vessels will be kept tidy and free of oil or other substances that might be
accidentally or otherwise washed overboard. Litter and loose objects, e.g. tools, will not be left
lying around.
Dredged material will be transported and disposed of in such a manner to minimize loss of
contaminants either into solution or by resuspension.
Ballast and bilge water will be, handed over to registered re-refiners or treated at ballast water
treatment plant available in Bhavanapadu port.
While pumping out bilge and ballast water from ship to shore, care will be taken to avoid
spillage
Cleaning and removing muds from ballast tanks and sediments will be done under strict
supervision and the same will be discharged only at the shore reception facilities.
Surface runoff from storage yard area shall be directed to drainage channel connecting the
settling ponds (for settling down suspended load) and the outflow may be directed to ETP.
Surface runoff from coal berth area shall be managed by collecting it and sending to
sedimentation tank. There should not be washing and disposal into CRZ area.
Construction wastes like rubbish, food wastes, oil or chemicals etc. will not be disposed off into
the river.
Adequate measures to be adopted for rainwater harvesting and reusing. Rainwater harvesting
is the collection and storage of rain and prevent runoff. Most rooftops provide the necessary
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 260
platform for collecting water. Thus, all the port buildings must be provided with rainwater
harvesting structure.
Tidal exchange of creeks and other water bodies must be maintained by regular monitoring of
the shore line and sedimentation of the active seasonal creek mouths
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT
The overall objective of solid waste management plan is to minimize impact of waste generated through
the following:
Minimise the amount of waste that is generated;
Maximise the amount of waste that is recovered for recycling – including segregation of
recyclable
wastes at source;
Minimise the amount of waste that is deposited at landfill;
Ensure any hazardous wastes (e.g. used oils, lead-acid batteries) are securely stored and
transferred to appropriate facilities;
Ensure all wastes are properly contained, labelled and disposed of in accordance with
National/local regulations; and
Ensure waste is disposed of in accordance with the waste management hierarchy.
The proposed Solid Waste Management Plan at Bhavanapadu Port is based on the concept of 3-R i.e.
Reduce, Reuse and Recycle. This plan is developed to manage solid wastes and to avoid any discharges
into the soil/land or water. It shall establish procedures for the storage, collection and disposal of waste,
hazardous and non-hazardous solid waste.
There is no industrial waste except waste water and solid waste from port activities.
Waste to be generated from port activities (Internal Infrastructure) breakwater construction,
stack yard development, port berth works, basin protection while constructing diaphragm wall,
Cargo Handling Equipment’s, dredging.
From External Infrastructure during provision of external power supply, provision of external
water supply, provision of external telecommunications, port road connectivity, port rail
connectivity.
Waste from excavation, debris, C&D waste (Cement, bricks and sand etc.), Recyclable Waste
(Metals, packaging Material, Electronic waste and Organic waste, hazardous waste is generated
during construction phase.
The solid waste mainly can be called as dry rubbish which consists of paper, packaging material,
plastic etc. in addition to MSW out of which biodegradable waste and inert/non-biodegradable
waste will be generated.
4.4.7.1.1 Mitigation Measures
The Contractor shall implement procedures and processing to pursue a goal of “zero” waste discharge
from his construction activities. The biodegradable part of the waste would be treated in waste effluent
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 261
treatment plant and the remains of the treatment is used for manure or compost. The no biodegradable
part of the waste is sent to local dump yard.
This will require that the Contractor employ sustainable concepts and practices including recycling, re-
use, segregation, and others to minimize, if not eliminate, material and substances into the waste
stream.
Solid waste shall be segregated from hazardous waste/municipal solid waste and stored
separately till treatment/recycling, re-use.
Segregation of biodegradable and plastic wastes shall be done.
There shall not be any disposal of effluent/solid waste etc. into the sea.
Solid Waste generated at sites are to be collected and processed for recycling/re-use wherever
possible. Disposing it off landfill site shall be a last resort. The solid waste generated from the
harbour and port activities will be disposed off in scientific manner to secured landfill as per
Hazardous and Other Wastes (Management and Transboundary Movement) Rules, 2016.
The municipal solid waste generated which will be managed, treated or sent to authorize
recyclers. All solid waste generated from the construction and domestic activities shall be
collected, treated and disposed in such a manner so as not to cause environment pollution.
Plastics and rubber shall not be disposed off by burning and is to be handled and disposed as
per the draft plastic rules.
Hazardous wastes shall be handled, stored, managed and disposed off in compliance with the
relevant regulations.
Selection of disposal sites shall be carried out in consultation with APPCB, revenue department
and forest department in order to ensure that no natural drainage, productive lands or natural
habitat is adversely impacted due to disposal of waste.
The Contractor is required to implement procedures for waste minimization to reduce, reuse,
recycle and recover as much waste material or reuse as is practical. Waste minimization and
segregation shall be exercised during mobilization, installation, execution and demobilization
phases of the Works.
The Contractor shall endeavor to minimize waste materials such as equipment consumables,
packaging and the like. All scrap generated during construction shall be segregated into
components such as glass, paper products, aluminium, steel, rubber, insulation materials,
plastics, steel, wood and the like.
All excavated material, excess building materials and waste, other than material designated to
be stockpiled on the site, shall be removed from the Site and disposed off, in a legal manner. No
waste shall be disposed in the Coastal Regulation Zone (CRZ) area. All permits and approvals
necessary for the removal and disposal of demolition materials shall be obtained in advance. All
unused material shall be removed from site in a progressive manner either by use of a weekly
emptied dump hopper or similar removal arrangement.
The sellable wastes shall be sold only to the authorized vendors. The Site and surrounds shall be
kept tidy at all times.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 262
Table 4.16: Activity and Impacts during construction and operation phase of proposed port project
Environmental Aspects
Pre-construction/ Land Acquisition/Construction Operation
Activities Potential Impacts Activities Potential Impacts
Impact on Air Environment
Operation of Vehicles and Construction machinery
Fuel burning at labour camps
Emission from various construction activities at Port construction location.
Emission from Use of Generators, Earth Moving Machinery, Tipper Lorries, Cranes, JCBs etc. for various construction and earth moving activities.
Odours related to use of fuel - during storage and use.
Deterioration in ambient air quality due to increased concentration of NOx , SOx, PM10, PM2.5 etc. directly affecting the health of Living organisms.
Health deterioration and nuisance in local communities
Health deterioration amongst onsite workers
Vehicle movement Cargo Handling Vehicular pollution Emission from ore and
coal Handling Emissions from ships
and marine spread during Port Operations
Emissions from trucks and other cargo handling equipment related to cargo handling and movement.
From open stacking of cargo like coal.
Volatile organic compounds associated with handling, storage and transfer of Hydrocarbons.
Deterioration in ambient air quality due to increased concentration of NOx , SOx, PM10, PM2.5 etc. directly affecting the health of Living organisms
Health deterioration and nuisance in local communities
Health deterioration amongst onsite workers
Impact on Water Environment
Construction of road and rail
Setting up of Labour camps
Dredging and construction
Dredging activities Dredge spoil disposal Surface runoff during
Water Pollution from labour camps
Increase in turbidity due to dredging and construction activities
Increased turbidity
Increase in BOD/COD
Change in pH, Salinity, TDS
Increase in micro plastics load
Storage of cargo such as coal, iron ore etc.
Sewage generation
Oily effluent from maintenance area
Discharge of bilge and ballast
water
Maintenance dredging
Change in marine water quality due to
wastewater from stack yards, sewage,
Bilge and ballast. Oil spill from vessels serving
port Increase in turbidity
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 263
Environmental Aspects
Pre-construction/ Land Acquisition/Construction Operation
Activities Potential Impacts Activities Potential Impacts
earth works Pile driving activities Garbage and Sewage
contamination Clearing of local
vegetation for development works.
Wind / Dust movement
Increase in heavy metal concentration
Increase in Petroleum Hydrocarbons, Oil and grease loads
Contamination with e-coli and health impacting microbes
Not meeting drinking water standards
Rainfall runoff from open storage yards
Maintenance dredging activities
Waste and effluent disposal from Marine spread using the port
Bilge and ballast water from ships
Anti-fouling paints from ships bottom
Improper handling of sewage and garbage from ships
Impact on Noise Environment
Operation of vehicles and Construction machinery
Alarms, Sirens, Power generating equipment
Pile driving activities Dredging and
reclamation activities
Vibrations may be felt in the areas closer to the coast
Increased noise and vibration (continuous or variable) above a certain threshold value can impact the marine and terrestrial Fauna by affecting their ability to communicate, breed and find sources of food.
Operation of vehicles and
Machinery Marine traffic
movement of ships Operation of Cranes,
conveyors for cargo handling and other heavy equipment
Maintenance dredging activities
Vehicular traffic for cargo movement
Increased noise and vibration (continuous or variable) above a certain threshold value can impact the marine and terrestrial Fauna by affecting their ability to communicate, breed and find sources of food.
Impact on Soil Environment
Dredging activities Land Reclamation from
dredge spoils. Surface runoff during
earth works Garbage and Sewage
contamination
Deterioration in soil quality due to contamination and loss of productive fertile soil.
Change in basic soil characteristics leading to land use change.
Rainfall runoff from open storage yards
Maintenance dredging activities
Improper storage / handling of waste and effluents
Deterioration in soil quality due to contamination and loss of productive fertile soil.
Change in basic soil characteristics leading to land use change.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 264
Environmental Aspects
Pre-construction/ Land Acquisition/Construction Operation
Activities Potential Impacts Activities Potential Impacts
Plastic contamination Clearing of trees and
vegetation Wind / Dust movement Leaks and improper
disposal of oil fuel and hydrocarbons
Leaks and spills from tank farms and pipelines
Leeching of wastes and hazardous substances stored in port premises
Impact on Ecology
Construction of road and rail clearing of site and land levelling Reclamation and dredging
Removal of Vegetation and trees
Dredging Breakwater construction
Dredging and dumping of Dredged material shall impact
marine flora and fauna leading to fatality.
Cargo Handling Maintenance dredging
Dredging and dumping of dredged material shall impact marine flora and fauna leading to fatality.
Marine bio fouling from ship bottoms
Underwater hull cleaning activities
Marine/ Coastal Processes and Hydrological Impacts
Construction of Breakwaters
Improper dumping of construction waste materials
Improper dredge disposal locations
Incorrect land levelling and reclamation techniques
Building of shore protection measures to control erosion
Change in sedimentation and siltation patterns
Beach erosion / accretion Impact on tidal exchange and
flow Chocking of inland drainage
during rainy seasons leading to flooding and hydrological impacts
Improper dredge disposal locations during maintenance dredging
Adoption of any new shore protection measures to control erosion
Development of new infrastructure that affects the natural creeks and estuarine openings on the coast
Change in sedimentation and siltation patterns
Beach erosion / accretion Impact on tidal exchange and
flow Chocking of inland drainage
during rainy seasons leading to flooding and hydrological impacts
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 265
IMPACT ON BIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT
There is average number of vegetation present near proposed project premises. Biodiversity for trees,
shrubs and herbs indicates medium biodiversity in the area.
Flora: According to primary and secondary survey, a total of 140 tree species belonging to 49 families
were found in the study area. The primary and secondary survey reveals the presence of 69 shrub
species in the study area and its environs.As per the floristic study of project area, there are no rare and
endangered species are found.
Fauna: A total of 15 mammalian species reported from the study area. A total of 10 species of
Amphibians and 33 species of reptiles were recorded during the survey period. Among the 22 species of
reptiles 2 were turtles, 13 were lizards and 7 were snakes. During the field surveys a total of 111 species
were sighted. Out of the total 111 avi-faunal species 25 species are migratory birds (Winter & Summer
visitors).Out of the total 15 mammalian species recorded from the study area Seven (07) species were
classified under Scheduled-II (Par-I) and Three (03) species under Schedule-III and four (04) species
under Schedule-IV. While No mammalian Species were listed under Schedule-I of the Wildlife
(Protection), Act, 1972. No mammalian species is listed under IUCN Red list of Threatened Species
Version 2019.3 as Rare, Endangered and Threatened (RET) Species. With regards to amphibian species
two (02) species were listed under Schedule-IV while no schedule-I, II & III species were found in the
study area. Similarly no herpetofauna of ecological importance were found in the study area as per IUCN
Red List.
Among Reptiles One (01) Schedule-I, three (03) Schedule-II and One (01) Schedule-IV species were found
in the study area. With regards to IUCN Red list of Threatened Species Version 2019.3 as Rare,
Endangered and Threatened (RET) Species, three (03) Vulnerable and three (03) Near Threatened
Reptile species were found in the study area.
With regards to the avifaunal species one (01) Schedule-I were reported/observed in the study area,
whereas five (05) avi-faunal specie are listed as Near Threatened (NT) and one (01) species is listed
under Vulnerable category of IUCN Red list of Threatened Species Version 2019.3.
4.4.8.1 Impacts & Mitigation
Terrestrial biodiversity might be affected during construction phase of the project by the operation of
project machinery and vehicular movements in the project areas and from increased human population
(labourers etc.) during project activities.
During operation phase of the project, the green cover of the area has attracted birds and small fauna
like squirrels etc. giving a positive impact on faunal environment.
Biodiversity Conservation Plan is developed for the Scheduled I species coming in the study area.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 266
GREEN PORT INITIATIVE
Considering the importance of environment in the sustainable growth, the Government of India has
initiated ‘Project Green Ports’ that concerns the transition of major ports of India into greener and
cleaner ports.
This Project has two elements one is ‘Green Ports Initiatives’ related to environmental issues and
the second is ‘Swachh Bharat Abhiyaan’ (GOI, 2016).
This Initiative includes actions that will be periodically implemented to accomplish all the targets.
• Construction and Monitoring Plans for Environmental Protection.
• Securing Necessary Equipment for the Monitoring Of Environmental Pollution.
• Procuring Dust Eliminating and Suppressing System.
• Establishing Wastewater Treatment Plant, Sewage Plant, and Garbage Disposal Plants.
• Establishing Renewable Energy Production Projects in the Ports.
• Improving Oil Spill Response (Osr) Facilities.
• Control And Prohibit Waste Disposal Into The Sea.
Under Swachh Bharat Abhiyaan, there are various initiatives considered in timely action to promote
cleanliness at the ports, such plan has to be qualified by regular training and awareness and are to be
initiated in all major ports of India.
These Aspects will be closely relevant and implemented in the Development of the proposed new port
as part of the overall impact mitigation measures in a proactive manner.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 267
CHAPTER 5 ALTERNATIVE OF ANALYSIS
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 268
5 ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES
This Chapter presents the criteria on the basis of which proposed port site is selected, followed by its
further evaluation based on the various criteria and assigning proper weightage to them.
5.1 GENERAL
The consideration of alternatives from environmental and project economics is one of the cardinal and
proactive aspects in conception of a project. It is mainly instrumental for proper project planning, safe
and economical designing and adoption of state-of-the-art technology through examining options
instead of only focusing on the more defensive task of reducing adverse impacts of a single design. This
includes the systematic comparison of feasibility alternatives to the proposed project, inter alia specific
project site, technological and operational alternatives. Alternatives are compared in terms of their
potential environmental impacts, project economics, and suitability under local conditions.
In the process of EIA, analysis of alternatives is the key tool to examine the extent of environmental
impacts both beneficial and adverse, posed by the construction and operation of proposed project vis-à-
vis the environmental status of region without development of the project. It also involves comparison
and environmental evaluation of the different alternatives proposed in the project.
5.2 ALTERNATIVE LOCATIONS
Intially location of Bhavanapadu port was identified on north of Tekkali Creek based on due
diligence carried out. During the terms of reference appraisal by MoEF&CC, it is suggested to explore the
possibility of alternate sites in view of eroding nature of coast towards north of creek, impact on fish
landing centre and major R&R issues. (as the development needed acquisition of three (3) fully
habitated villages). Hence alternative locations have been studied.
Three site locations have been evaluated as part of the Techno-Economic Feasibility Report (TEFR) for
development of Port with following alternative studies. Alternative locations identified for Bhavanapadu
Port are shown in Figure 5.1.
Alternative 1: North Side of Tekkali Creek
Alternative 2: Inside the Tekkali Creek
Alternative 3: South Side of Tekkali Creek
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 269
Figure 5.1: Alternative locations identified for Bhavanapadu Port
ALTERNATIVE 1: NORTH SIDE OF TEKKALI CREEK
The north side of Tekkali Creek was identified for Bhavanapadu port development. The proposed port
location of North of Tekkali Creek is shown in Figure 5.2 and proposed layout is hown in Figure 5.3. The
layout proposed is around 1.2 km north from existing Tekkali creek. In the proposed layout, three
general cargo berths will be constructed along the shore and one coal jetty will be constructed normal
to the shore along the southern breakwater during phase 1 development.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 270
Figure 5.2 Alternative-I location
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 271
Figure 5.3: Proposed Port Layout-North of Tekkali Creek for Alternative-I Site
ALTERNATIVE 2: INSIDE THE TEKKALI CREEK
Inside of Tekkali creek was also studied for the development of Bhavanapadu port. The proposed port
location as Alternative II is shown in Figure 5.4 and proposed Layout is shown as Figure 5.5. As an
alternative, the port development can be taken place inside the Tekkali creek by keeping all four berths
along the southern side of creek in a row and maintaining channel width of 500m. In the proposed
layout, three general cargo berths and one coal berth will be constructed along the southern side of
creek during phase 1.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 272
Figure 5.4 Alternative-II location
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 273
Figure 5.5: Port Layout at Tekkali Creek for Alternative II Location
ALTERNATIVE 3: SOUTH SIDE OF TEKKALI CREEK
The South of Tekkali creek was studied for the development of Bhavanapadu port as Alternative III. The
port development as per proposed layout can be taken place at around 1.64 km south from existing
Tekkali creek. The proposed port location as Alternative III is shown in Figure 5.6.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 274
Figure 5.6 Alternative-III locations identified for Bhavanapadu Port
In the proposed layout, three general cargo berths will be constructed along the shore and one coal jetty
will be constructed normal to the shore along the southern breakwater in phase 1.
Comparitive maxtrix has been prepared considering all the alternative options to understand the
positive and negevtive aspect of each option which is shown in Table 5.1.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 275
Table 5.1 Comparative Matrix of all three locations along Bhavanapadu Coast P
RO
S
S.No. Description
Alternate-1
(North of creek)
Alternate-2 (Inside creek)
Alternate-3
(South of creek)
Remarks
1. Future expansion possibility
-
2. Natural Tranquility availability
-
3. Land availability for backup area development
-
4. Good Hinterland connectivity
Bridges would be required for Option 2 & 3
5. Eco-friendly In option-2, Tekkali creek, fishing activity will be disturbed due to vessel movements.
6. Technical feasibility (eg. Dredging, design challenges.)
Due to lesser depth Contours in creek, dredging qty. will be the highest in option 2.
CO
NS
1. Interfering with existing Fishery harbor
2. Problem due to existing Mangroves
In option 2 mangroves area will be disturbed.
3. Adjoining physical constraints e.g existing groynes
The southern arm of mouth protection would pose difficulty in increasing width of berthing area.
4. Higher R&R (rehabilitation & reconstruction) costs
In option-1, due to non-availability of land, R&R costs will be much higher.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 276
5.3 COMPARISON OF ALTERNATIVE STUDIES FOR SELECTION OF PROJECT LAYOUT
Table 5.2: Comparison between Alternative 1, Alternative 2 and Alternative 3 S.No Alternative Merits Demerits
1 Alternative 1:
North Side of
Tekkali Creek
The Port and Harbour was planned in the North Side of
tekkali creek wherein ToR was granted on 20 May 2016
and there was a G.O. issued for the identified port area.
However, during the 243rd EAC meeting, the committee
suggested that North location is an eroding coast and further
studies are necessary to confirm the location.
Due to littoral drift movement, there would be a possible
deposition or closure of the mouth of Tekkali Creek south of
the Southern breakwater as a result of the breakwater
construction. This may be difficult for the fishing community to
make their way to the creek's fish landing centre.
As per local revenue officers, acquiring private land would be
extremely difficult, and the same could be said for R & R.
(rehabilitation & resettlement). The port's development would
be hampered by the difficulties in acquiring land and the R&R
concerns.
Therefore, from the above-mentioned serious demerits, the North side of Tekkali creek is not considered as a viable option for the port development.
2 Alternative 2:
Inside the Tekkali
Creek
The development of port inside the Tekkali creek
will prove beneficial as it shall provide good
tranquillity for the vessels berthed inside the creek.
The lengths of the breakwater required would be
less considering that the berths shall be placed
inside the creek.
The Creek site has been identified as ecologically and
environmentally sensitive. Mangroves can be seen growing on
both sides of the creek. The Creek site has been identified as
ecologically and environmentally sensitive. Mangroves can be
seen growing on both sides of the creek. Furthermore, because
of the confluence zone of creek mouth and the sea, the
development of deep-water port facilities is anticipated to have
a long-term impact on aquatic ecology and estuary conditions.
From social point of view, the existing fish landing centre and
fishing activity inside the creek would be impacted. Issues with
R&R are to be expected.
The existent creek width is around 100 metres, and it will
require significant widening (approximately 350-400 metres)
for the development of a Creek Based Port and two-way vessel
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 277
S.No Alternative Merits Demerits
movement.
Presence of sub-surface rock is observed at a relatively shallow
depth. In line with the Electric Resistivity Survey carried out in
the creek, weathered/ fractured rock is found to exist at
around -6m wherein the proposed depth to maintained is -
19.6m.
In order to facilitate vessel manoeuvring, the creek is required
to be widened and deepened. The deepening and widening of
the Channel shall be difficult due to underwater rock, which is
both costly and time consuming. Additionally, rock dredging
and blasting would induce an ecological imbalance in the area's
flora and fauna.
The creek's hydrodynamic conditions are not conducive to
deep water port development.
The Port's development in the Creek will interrupt the natural
flow of water. The Port structures would obstruct the natural
flow of water from catchment areas, and are most likely to
result in local silt deposition.
Creek Port would necessitate a significant amount of capital
and maintenance dredging. The same would demand frequent
maintenance dredging, resulting in severe downtime to Port
operations.
Removal of existing southern groin/ bund for safe maneuvering
of ships into the creek.
Since the port area development is envisioned on the creek’s
south bank, construction of brdiges over Tekkali creek shall be
a requisite for road and rail connectivity.
Flooding of Port facilities is envisaged during rainy season.
In view of the above-mentioned demerits, the development of deep-water port in Tekkali Creek area is not a viable option.
3 Alternative 3:
South Side of
The proposed site does not involve any major
issue/ obstacles with respect to technical,
Longer breakwaters are required and hence the cost would be
increased.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 278
S.No Alternative Merits Demerits
Tekkali Creek environmental and social aspects, hence making it
an ideal location for development of deep water
Port.
There will be no significant impact on the existing
Fishery Harbour in Tekkali Creek. The depths ar the
creek mouth would actually be improved as a result
of this port development. The Tekkali creek will be
protected from sedimentation and possible port-
based pollution.
In accordance to the recent Electric Resistivity
Survey that has been conducted, it has been
reported that the rock is not present upto a depth
of 16m.
The port can be planned and designed from
futuristic perspective with considerable room for
capacity expansion.
Deeper draught vessels can be called at the Port
thereby reduced logistic cost for the tonnage
handled in comparison with Alternative 2.
This location has the benefit of having exisiting
groin on the north of northern arm of breakwater,
which traps the long shore drift in a possible
erosion region due to the proposed harbour.
Dredged material can be put to use for the
development of back-up area and ground
improvement.
In comparison with Alternative 2, the quantity of
maintenance dredging would be very minimal.
The creek mouth will naturally deepen due to
littoral drift movement and the natural balancing
phenomenon of net sediment transport and would
Construction of bridges over Tekkali creek is required for road
and rail connectivity.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 279
S.No Alternative Merits Demerits
prove beneficialfor the fishermen.
In view of the above-mentioned merits; Alternative 3 i.e., South Side of Tekkali Creek is suitable for Deep Water Port Development.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 280
Considering various alternates and merits and demerits elaborated above, it is concluded that the
Alternate -3, south of Tekkali creek is the best location for setting up the proposed Bhavanapadu Port.
The model studies are pertaining to the recommended alternate, i.e., Port location on the south side.
Under this Alternative-3, two alternative port layouts have been examined as stated below:
5.3.1.1 ALTERNATIVE 3.1
As an alternative, the port development can be taken place at around 1.64 km south from existing
Tekkali creek. In the proposed layout, three general cargo berths will be constructed along the shore and
one coal jetty will be constructed normal to the shore along the southern breakwater in phase 1. The
layout is shown as Figure 5.7
5.3.1.2 ALTERNATIVE 3.2
This alternate accommodates more berths and more tranquil than alternate 3.1. The layout is shown as
Figure 5.8.
Figure 5.7: Port Layout-South of Tekkali Creek (Alternative 3.1)
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 281
Figure 5.8: Port Layout-South of Tekkali Creek (Alternative 3.2) Recommended Option/ Layout
5.4 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Based on the above-mentioned technical, environmental, social, flexibility for future development and
cost aspects relating to proposed port development options, Alternative 3 (Alternative 3.2) is
recommended for Deep Water Port Development and the ToR has been granted for the same.
On the basis of the reconnaissance survey carried out, it has been understood that there is a rock outcrop
near the Tekkali creek towards south, it has also been understood that there exists a ship wreck also.
Based on the review of the primary data collected, the main findings can be listed out as follows:
Hard rock outcrop has limited extent.
Further, soft rock is found a 13 m and below.
Hard rock is perceived to be limited around outcrop region as per Electric Resistivity studies.
The rock profile is showing a deeper profile as we move towards south.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 282
Based on the observations and further discussions, it has been decided to shift the port locations towards
south of creek mouth which was earlier planned near to the creek.
Alternate port layout study carried out for setting up of green filed port at Bhavanapadu
revealed that the port layout on the south of the Tekkali creek is more ideal for port
development considering the following merits.
The port is located in medium accretion zone as per DOM and MOEF classification
The latest satellite imagery indicates the accretion on the south side of the Tekkali creek
groin
This south side port layout will not interfere with Fishery harbour located inside the Tekkali
creek
The Tekkali creek will be protected from sedimentation and possible port-based pollution
It has the advantage of having existing groin on the south of Tekkali creek which traps the
long shore drift
This requires less amount of capital and maintenance dredging since port development takes
place on sea side.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 283
CHAPTER 6 ENVIRONMENT MONITORING
PROGRAMME
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 284
6 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAMME
Monitoring of environmental attributes is an essential component for sustainability of any
developmental project. It is an integral part of any environmental impact assessment process. Any
development project introduces complex inter-relationships in the project area between people, various
natural resources, biota and the many developing forces, thus, creates a new environment. It is very
difficult to predict with complete certainty the exact post-project development environmental scenario.
Hence, monitoring of critical parameters is essential during project construction and operation phases.
Monitoring of environmental indicators signal potential problems if any and facilitate timely
implementation of effective remedial measures. It will also allow for validation of the assumptions and
assessments made in the present study. Monitoring becomes essential to ensure that the mitigation
measures planned for implementation during the period of project operations are effective/ appropriate
for intended degree of environmental protection.
This includes judicious decision making in consultation with responsible agencies (e.g. Andhra Pradesh
State Pollution Control Board (APPCB)) or reputed environmental consultants for appropriate changes in
the monitoring strategy, changes in the monitoring frequency, and any new requirements. The data so
generated also serves as a data bank for prediction of scenarios during construction and operation
phases in similar projects.
The main objectives of the environmental monitoring are;
To develop site specific monitoring program for environmental parameters likely to be affected
due to construction and operation of proposed port.
To determine the environmental effects of operational activities
Too increase understanding of cause-effect relationships between activity and environmental
change.
To verify the efficacy of the implemented mitigation measures and there on to modify them, if
necessary, the post project monitoring becomes inevitable.
The post project monitoring program is an equally important aspect in Environmental
Management Plan. A continuous review of post project monitoring program shall be conducted
by the Environment Management Cell (EMC) to identify the effectiveness of mitigation measures
suggested.
Detailed plan of Monitoring of environmental attributes during construction and operational phases of
the proposed development of Bhavanpadu Port has been prepared. Estimated cost for the
environmental monitoring shall be in included in the EMP Chapter.
6.1 MONITORING PLAN FOR CONSTRUCTION PHASE
Environment attributes to be monitored during construction phase will cover both marine and
terrestrial environment. Monitoring Programme for construction phase is presented in Table 6.1
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 285
Table 6.1: Environmental Monitoring Programme-Construction Phase
Item Parameters to be monitored
Sampling Locations
Frequency per year
Methods for Sampling & Analysis
Compliance
Meteorology Wind speed, wind direction, temperature, relative humidity and rainfall
One (1)
365 Bureau of Indian Standards (IS 8829) and India Meteorological Department (IMD).
Online Monitoring Machine
Wind speed, wind direction, temperature, relative humidity and rainfall
One (1)
365
Air Quality All 12 parameters as per NAAQ standards
Five (5)
104 Fine Particulate Samplers for PM10, PM2.5, and Respirable Dust Sampler for SO2 and NO2, CO analyser /portable CO meter for CO and portable HC meter for HC (Hydro Carbon), other parameters as per standard methods.
National Ambient Air Quality Standards released during November, 2009
Noise Levels Day and night noise levels
Five (5)
12 24 hr continuous with 1 hr interval.
National Ambient Noise Standards, GSR 1063 (E), 1989
Water Quality
Physical, Chemical and Bacteriological
Ground water Six (6) Surface water Six (6)
3 Grab sampling and analysis by using standard methods.
IS10500, 2012 drinking water standards for Groundwater/potable water. Designated Best Use Classification of Inland Surface Water of National Rivers Conservation Directorate, MoEF&CC for Surface Water
Soil Soil texture, type, electrical conductivity, pH, infiltration, porosity, etc.,
Eight (8)
1 Collection and analysis of samples as per IS 2720
Baseline data & Environmental Compliance monitoring data.
Marine Marine Water Four (4) 12 Bottom sampler (and Primary water quality
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 286
Item Parameters to be monitored
Sampling Locations
Frequency per year
Methods for Sampling & Analysis
Compliance
Outfall location
Quality: Physical, Chemical and Microbial
analysis by using standard methods. Grab sampling.
standards for harbour water
Marine Ecology
Plankton and Benthic Communities
Six (6)
3 Primary water quality standards for harbour water Sediment
Quality: Physical, Chemical and Microbial
Noise & Viberatio
Five (5) 12 National Ambient Noise Standards, GSR 1063 (E), 1989
Mobillisation 12 locations
Man-month 36
6.2 MONITORING PLAN FOR OPERATION PHASE
Monitoring program is suggested to identify changes in the terrestrial and marine environment due
to operation of proposed Port. Monitoring program shall be carried out during the operational phase
of the project and it shall be repeated at six monthly intervals as per Standardization of Environment
Clearance conditions, by MoEF&CC (F. No. 22-34/2018-IA.III dated January 4,2019).
The monitoring must be organized with qualified and experienced environmental team. Standard
procedure shall be followed in sample collection and analysis. Half yearly monitoring of air, noise,
ground water, seawater quality, seabed sediment and marine ecology is recommended at port
premises, nearby villages, waterfront area and approach channel.
Post project monitoring program has been planned based on the prediction of impacts and
mitigation measures suggested. Summary matrix of environmental monitoring covering locations of
monitoring stations, frequency of sampling & analysis etc. are presented below in Table 6.2.
Table 6.2: Environmental Monitoring Programme-Operation Phase
Item Parameters to be monitored
Sampling Locations
Frequency per year
Methods for Sampling & Analysis
Compliance
Meteorology Wind speed, wind direction, temperature, relative humidity and rainfall
One (1)
365 Bureau of Indian Standards (IS 8829) and India Meteorological Department (IMD).
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 287
Item Parameters to be monitored
Sampling Locations
Frequency per year
Methods for Sampling & Analysis
Compliance
Air Quality All 12 parameters as per NAAQ standards
Five (5)
104 Fine Particulate Samplers for PM10, PM2.5, Respirable Dust Sampler for SO2 and NO2, CO analyser /portable CO meter for CO and portable HC meter for HC (Hydro Carbon), other parameters as per standard methods.
National Ambient Air Quality Standards released during November, 2009
Noise Levels Day and night noise levels
Five (5)
12 24 hr continuous with 1 hr interval.
National Ambient Noise Standards, GSR 1063 (E), 1989
Water Quality Physical, Chemical and Bacteriological
Ground water Six (6) Surface water Six (6)
12 Grab sampling and analysis by using standard methods.
IS10500, 2012 drinking water standards for Groundwater/potable water. 12 De12signated Best Use Classification of Inland Surface Water of National Rivers Conservation Directorate, MoEF&CC for Surface Water
Soil Soil texture, type, electrical conductivity, pH, infiltration, porosity, etc.,
Eight (8)
12 Collection and analysis of samples as per IS 2720
Baseline data & Environmental Compliance monitoring data.
STP outlet Physical, Chemical and Bacteriological
Two (2)
12 Grab sampling and analysis by using standard methods.
As per CPCB
Stack PM10, PM2.5, SO2, Two (2) 12 Fine As per CPCB
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 288
Item Parameters to be monitored
Sampling Locations
Frequency per year
Methods for Sampling & Analysis
Compliance
Monitoring NO2, and co Particulate Samplers for PM10, PM2.5, and Respirable Dust Sampler for SO2 and NO2, CO analyser /portable CO meter for CO and portable HC meter for HC (Hydro Carbon), other parameters as per CPCB Guidelines.
COMPLIANCE AND REPORTING
The results of monitoring shall be reported to the statutory authorities: i) APPCB and ii)
Regional Office of MoEFCC, Chennai. Half yearly report should include condition of
Environmental clearance and status of compliance.
It shall also cover different statutory returns/ compliance reports to be submitted such as:
Submission of half yearly compliance report in respect of the stipulated prior environmental
clearance terms and conditions in soft copy to APPCB and Regional Office of MoEFCC on 1st
June and 1st December of each calendar year.
Submission of environmental statement for the financial year ending 31st March to the
APPCB on or before 30th September every year.
Records of Hazardous Waste if any in Form 4 as per Hazardous Waste Rules 2016.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 289
CHAPTER 7
ADDITIONAL STUDIES
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 290
7 ADDITONAL STUDIES
7.1 SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
The Social Impact Assessment (SIA) includes a Census of all likely affected structures, and sample Socio-
economic Survey of project affected households. It also includes Consultations and Focused Group
Discussions (FGDs) with the affected people. The SIA identifies and measures impacts on land,
residential and commercial structures. The impact of the project on title holders, tenants, encroachers,
squatters, kiosks, wage earners/ operators residing/ operating on existing public/ government land and
loss of livelihood due to implementation of the proposed project.
SIA shall be carried out with the following broad objectives:
Assess adversely affected land and structures,
Benchmark affected land, structures, affected families and socio-economic status of the affected people,
Identifying potential impacts of the project affected families, and
Identifying impacts on the Community Property Resources.
RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN (RAP)
The Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) shall be prepared to provide mitigation measures of the impact
identified in the Social Impact Assessment (SIA).
An Entitlement Matrix (EM) shall be formulated with all possible types of losses and the corresponding
nature and scope of eligibility for entitlements. The Entitlement Matrix shall adopt the provisions of the
Land Acquisition (LA), Rehabilitation and Resettlement (R&R) assistances from The Andhra Pradesh State
Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation & Resettlement
(Andhra Pradesh Amendment) Act, 2018 and RFCTLARR Act, 2013.
The RAP shall also include entitlements for different types of impacts, institutional mechanisms,
implementation schedules, land acquisition and R&R budgets, assessment of income restoration
mechanisms, grievance redress mechanism, and internal and external monitoring mechanisms.
LEGAL AND POLICY FRAMEWORK
The Legal and Policy Framework (LPD) and principles adopted for addressing resettlement issues in the
Project have been guided by the proposed legislation and policies of the GOI, the state Government of
Andhra Pradesh and in accordance with the principles of APMB. Prior to the preparation of the
Resettlement Plan, a detailed analysis of the proposed national and state policies was undertaken and
an entitlement matrix has been prepared for the entire program. The section below provides details of
the various national and state level legislations studied and their applicability within this framework.
This Resettlement Policy is prepared based on the review and analysis of all applicable legal and policy
frameworks of the country and state policy requirements. A summary of applicable acts and policies is
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 291
presented in the following paragraphs and the detailed policy review and comparison is provided in the
entitlement matrix.
PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVE
As per the Detailed Project Report (DPR) approximately 1010.00 Acres of land would be required for the
development of proposed Greenfield Port at Bhavanapadu, Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh. Out of
total land, approximately 320.05 acres of land shall be acquired from patta land (private land), 234.44
acres from salt pan land, 122.06 acres from coastal belt land, 66.54 acres from revenue land, 2.99 acres
from forest land, 79.00 acre from waste land and 184.92 acres required for external rail and road
connectivity. While the patta land shall be acquired as per RFCTLARR-2013 and RFCTLARR (Andhra
Pradesh Amendment) Act 2018, the salt land, revenue land, coastal belt land and forest land shall be
transferred from respective government department. In addition, the habitation of village Mulapeta and
Pathlingadu have been proposed to be displaced and relocated with workable R&R Plan and all basic
amenities.
The impacts of the project will not be limited to the land acquisition but will also affect and displace
people residing and/ or operating their petty business or other activities from the structures that are
falling in Mulapeta and Pathlingadu villages. Thus, the project will cause both physical and economic
impacts. Therefore, improvements on land will be impacted leading to relocation, disruption of shelter
and business, loss of livelihood, etc. The broad impacts likely to be caused due to the proposed project
are:
Loss of land (built-up, agricultural, open barren etc.);
Severance of land plots;
Residual land area becoming unviable;
Loss of structure (full or partial) of Titleholder, Squatter, Encroacher, Occupant;
Loss of other properties and assets such as boundary walls, hand pumps, tube wells, dug wells
etc.;
Displacement of owners and tenants of both residential and commercial entities;
Loss of livelihood of land owners and persons associated with land and business;
Loss of kiosk, work shed etc.;
Loss of trees, standing crops etc.;
Loss of common property resources such as religious places, graveyard, cremation places, water resources, village gates, etc.;
Impacts on the livelihood of persons losing business units including commercial encroachers and squatters,
Disruption of social network during the construction period and access to resources etc.
The purpose and objectives of legal and policy framework are to ensure that compensation and
resettlement and rehabilitation aspects of the project are consistent with the national, state laws,
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 292
notifications and policies. Resettlement and rehabilitation activities are implemented in accordance with
the provisions laid down under this section.
LEGAL FRAMEWORK FOR LAND ACQUISITION, RESETTLEMENT AND REHABILITATION
The following section outlines the laws, policy principles and procedures recommended to be followed
for land acquisition, compensation and resettlement and rehabilitation assistance for project affected
households/ persons (PAHs/PAPs).
The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (RFCTLARR, 2013);
The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement (Andhra Pradesh Amendment) Act, 2018;
Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Acts, 2006;
The Scheduled Castes and The Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989;
The Gazette of India, Extraordinary, S.O 425(E), Ministry of Rural Development Notification dated 9th February 2016;
The Provisions of the Panchayats (Extension to the Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996;
Right to Information Act, 2005; and
CSR activities under Companies Act, 2013.
APPLICABLE SOCIAL SAFEGUARD POLICY FOR PROPOSED GREENFIELD PORT PROJECT
AT BHAVANAPADU
The social safeguard policies applicable for the proposed project are summarized in the Table below:
S. No. Acts, Notifications and
Policies Relevant to the Project Applicability
1. RFCTLARR 2013 The Act lays down procedures for land acquisition and providing resettlement & rehabilitation assistance.
Applicable
2. Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement (Andhra Pradesh Amendment) Act, 2018
This Act was published in first time on the 30th May, 2018 in the Andhra Pradesh Gazette for general information and deemed to have come into effect on 1st January 2014. As per Section 3 of this Act Chapter II and Chapter III of RFCTLARR 2013 are not applicable for this Project. As per this Act, State Government or its Authorized Office will enter into an agreement with the willing land owner to sell the land in favour of the State for the matters specified therein in a prescribed form.
Applicable
3. The Gazette of India, Extraordinary, S.O 425(E), Ministry of Rural Development Notification dated 9th February 2016
Notifies that market value of land shall be multiplied by a factor of 2 in the case of rural areas.
Applicable
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 293
ENTITLEMENT MATRIX
Compensation for the lost assets to all displaced persons will be paid on the basis of replacement cost.
Resettlement assistance for lost income and livelihoods will be provided to both title holders and non-
title holders. Special resettlement and rehabilitation measures will be made available to the “Vulnerable
Group” comprises of DPs living below poverty line (BPL), SC, ST, women headed households, the elderly
and the disabled. An Entitlement Matrix has been formulated, which recognizes and lists various types
of losses resulting out of the project and specific compensation and resettlement packages. Entitlement
Matrix presented in Table 7.1 below:
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 294
Table 7.1: Entitlement Matrix
S. No.
Impact Category Entitlements Implementation Guidelines
PART I. TITLE HOLDERS-Compensation for Loss of Private Property
1 Loss of Land (agricultural, homestead, commercial or otherwise)
1.1 Compensation for land at Replacement Cost or Land for land, where feasible
Land will be acquired by the competent authority in accordance with the provisions of RFCTLARR Act, 2013 and Andhra Pradesh RFCTLARR (Andhra Pradesh Amendment) Act, 2018.
Replacement cost for Land will be, higher of (i) market value as per Indian Stamp Act, 1899 for the registration of sale deed or agreements to sell, in the area where land is situated; or (ii)average sale price for similar type of land, situated in the nearest village or nearest vicinity area, ascertained from the highest 50% of sale deeds of the preceding 3years; or (iii) consented amount paid for PPPs or private companies.
Plus 100%solatium and 12%interest from date of notification to award.
The multiplier factor adopted by State Government for land in rural area, based on the distance from urban area to the affected area, will be applied.
In case of severance of land, house, manufactory or other building, As per Section 94(1), the whole land and /or structure shall be acquired, if the owner so desires.
2 Loss of Structure (house, shop, building or immovable property or assets attached to the land)
2.1 Compensation at replacement cost The market value of structures and other immovable properties will be determined by Competent Authority for Land Acquisition (CALA) on the basis of relevant Schedule of rates (SR) as on date without depreciation and consultation with Roads and Building Department.
Plus 100% solatium
For partly affected structures, the DP will have the option of – claiming compensation for the entire structure, if the remaining portion is unviable.
PART II. REHABILITATION AND RESETTLEMENT- Both Land Owners and Families Whose Livelihood is Primarily Dependent on Land Acquired
3 Loss of land 3.1 Employment to at least one member per affected family in
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 295
S. No.
Impact Category Entitlements Implementation Guidelines
the project or arrange for a job in such other project as may be required after providing suitable training and skill development in the required field and at a rate not lower than the minimum wages provided for in any other law for the time being in force.
Or
One-time payment of Rs.5,00,000/-for each affected household.
Or
Annuity policy that shall pay Rs, 2000/- per month for 20 years with appropriate indexation to CPITAL
3.2 Monthly subsistence allowance of Rs, 3000/-per month for a period of one year to affected households who require to relocate due to the project
3.3 Transportation assistance of Rs. 50,000/- for affected households who require to relocate due to the project
3.4 One-time assistance of Rs. 25,000/- to all those who loss a cattle shed
3.5 One time Resettlement Allowance of Rs, 50,000/- for affected household who have to relocate
3.6 Additional onetime assistance of Rs, 50,000/-to scheduled caste and scheduled tribe families who are displaced from scheduled areas and who require to relocate due to the project.
4 Loss of Residence 4.1 An alternative house for those who have to relocate, as per IAY specification in rural areas and constructed house/flat of minimum 50sq.m. in urban areas or cash in lieu of house if opted (the cash in lieu of house will be Rs, 70,000/-in the line with Gol IAY standards in rural areas and Rs, 1,50,000 in case of urban areas) , for those who do not have any homestead land and who have been residing in the affected areas continuously for a minimum period of 3years
Stamp Duty and registration charges will be borne by the project in case of new houses or sites.
4.2 Employment to at least one member per affected family in the project or arrange for a job in such other project as may
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 296
S. No.
Impact Category Entitlements Implementation Guidelines
be required after providing suitable training and skill development in the required field and at a rate not lower than the minimum wages provided for any other law for the time being in force. Or One Time payment of Rs, 5,00,000/- for each affected household. Or Annuity policy that shall pay Rs, 2000/- per month or 20 years with appropriate indexation to CPITAL.
4.3 Monthly subsistence allowance of Rs, 3000/- per month for a period of one year to affected households who require to locate due to the project.
4.4 Transportation assistance of Rs. 50,000/- for affected households who require to relocate due to the project.
4.5 One-time assistance of Rs. 25,000/-to all those who lose a cattle shed.
4.6 One-time assistance of Rs. 25,000/- for each affected family of an artisan or self-employed and who has to relocate.
4.7 One-time Resettlement Allowance of Rs. 50,000/-for affected household who have to relocate.
4.8 Additional onetime assistance of Rs. 50,000/-to scheduled caste and scheduled tribe families who are displaced from scheduled areas and who require to relocate due to the project.
4.9 Right to salvage affected materials.
5 Loss of shop /trade /commercial structure
5.1 Employment to at least one number per affected family in the project or arrange for a job in such other project as may be required after providing suitable training and skill development in the required field and at a rate not lower than the minimum wages provided for in any other law. Or One-time Payment of Rs. 5,00,000/-for each affected household Or
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 297
S. No.
Impact Category Entitlements Implementation Guidelines
Annuity policy that shall pay Rs. 2000/-per month for 20 years with appropriate indexation to CPITAL
5.2 Monthly subsistence allowance of Rs. 3000/- per month for a period of one year to affected household who require to relocate due to the project
5.3 Transportation assistance of Rs. 50,000/-for affected household who require to relocate due to the project.
5.4 One-time assistance of Rs. 25,000/-for each affected family of an artisan or self-employed or small trader and who has to relocate.
5.5 One-time Resettlement Allowance of Rs. 50,000/-for affected household who have to relocate.
5.6 Additional onetime assistance of Rs. 50,000/-to scheduled caste and scheduled tribe families who are displaced from scheduled areas and who require to relocate due- to the project
5.7 Right to salvage affected materials.
PART III. IMPACT TO SQUATTERS/ENCROACHERS-
6 Impact of Squatters 6.1 6.1.1
Loss of House Compensation at scheduled rates without depreciation for structure with 1-month notice to demolish the affected structure.
Only those directly affected squatters who live there will be eligible for all assistance. Structure owners within project boundary/ Government lands who do not live there and have rented out the structure will be provided compensation for structure and no other assistance will be provided to them. The occupier (squatter-tenant) will be eligible for other assistance.
6.1.2 Right to salvage the affected materials.
6.1.3 House construction grant of Rs. 70,000/-for all those who have to relocate and who do not have a house. Additional house site grants of Rs. 50,000 to those who do not have a house site
6.1.4 One-time subsistence allowance of Rs. 18,000/-
6.1.5 One time Shifting assistance of Rs. 10,000/-
6.2 6.2.1
Loss of shop Compensation at scheduled rates without depreciation for structure with one-month notice to demolish affected structure.
Only those directly affected squatters who do business there will be eligible for all assistance. Structure owners in Government lands who do not live
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 298
S. No.
Impact Category Entitlements Implementation Guidelines
6.2.2 Right to salvage the affected materials. there and have rented out the structure will be provided compensation for structure and no other assistance will be provided to them.
6.2.3 One-time rehabilitation grants of Rs. 20,000/-for reconstruction of affected shop.
6.2.4 One time subsistence allowance of Rs.18,000/- The occupier (squatter-tenant) will be eligible for other assistance. 6.2.5 Shifting time assistance of Rs. 10,000/-
6.3 6.3.1
Kiosks/ Street Vendors 1-month advance notice to relocate to nearby place for continuance of economic activity.
APMB and the implementation support NGO/ agency will consult such DPs and assess the requirement of subsistence allowance and rehabilitation grant.
6.3.2 For temporary loss of livelihood during construction period, a monthly subsistence allowance of Rs. 3000/-will be paid for the duration of disruption to livelihood, but not exceeding 3-Months.
6.3.3 If relocation to nearby place and continuance of economic activity in the same place is not possible, then one-time rehabilitation grants of Rs. 18,000/-
6.4 6.4.1
Cultivation 2-month notice to harvest standing crops or market value of compensation for standing crops.
7 Impact to Encroachers 7.1 7.1.1
Cultivation 2-month notice to harvest standing crops or market value of compensation for standing crops, if notice is not given
Market value for the loss of standing crops will be decided by the CALA in consultation with the agriculture or Horticulture Department
7.2 7.2.1
Structure 1-month notice to demolish the encroached structure
7.2.2 Compensation at scheduled rates without depreciation for the affected portion of the structure
The value of commercial structure and other immovable properties will be determined by CALA on the basis of relevant scheduled rates (SR) as on date without depreciation
PART IV. IMPACT TO VULNERABLE HOUSEHOLD
8 Vulnerable Household 8.1 Training for skill development. This assistance includes cost of training and financial assistance for travel/conveyance and food.
One adult member of the affected household, whose livelihood is affected, will be entitled for skill development.
8.2 One-time assistance of Rs. 25,000/-to DHs who have to relocate.
NGO will identify the number of eligible vulnerable displaced persons during joint verification and shall update the RP and will conduct training need assessment in
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 299
S. No.
Impact Category Entitlements Implementation Guidelines
consultations with the DPs so as to develop appropriate training programmes suitable to the DPs skill, education and the region. Suitable trainers or local resources will be identified by APMB and NGO in consultation with local training institutes/NSDC.
PART V. IMPACT DURING CIVIL WORKS
9 Impact to structure /assets/ tree/ crops
9.1 The contractor is liable to pay damages to assets/tree/crops in privet/public land, caused due to civil works
APMB will ensure compliance
10 Use of private land 10.1 The contractor should obtain prior written consent from the landowner and pay mutually agreed rental for use of private land for storage of material or movement of vehicles and machinery or diversion of traffic during civil works
PART VI. COMMON PROPERTY RESOURCES
11 Impact to common property resources such as places of worship, community buildings, schools, etc.
11.1 Relocation or restoration, if feasible, or cash compensation at replacement cost.
12 Utilities such as water supply, electricity, etc.
12.1 Will be relocated and services restored prior to commencement of civil works
The APMB will ensure that utilities are relocated prior to commencement of civil works in accordance with the civil works schedule.
PART VII. UNFORSEEN IMPACT
Unforeseen Impacts encountered during implementation will be addressed in accordance with the principles of RFCTLARR2013/ Andhra Pradesh RFCTLARR (Andhra Pradesh Amendment) Act, 2018. In addition to the all entitlements given in the non-tribal area, Tribal Development Plan will be prepared for development assistance of the affected tribal communities in course of the competent authorities’ community and human development plans covering the following aspects: a. Contribution of existing tribal development and/or human development plans b. Assistance of competent authorities to prepare new tribal development plans and implement the plans c. Development of alternate fuel, fodder and non-timber forest produce resources on non-forest lands
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 300
APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY FOR SIA
The initial approach includes several discussions with the officials of APMB along with reconnaissance
visits to the site. The study approach has a combination of Review of available related data and
documents, Data collection from secondary sources and primary data collection through reconnaissance
surveys, Consultations with the stakeholders.
A combination of qualitative and quantitative approach shall be adopted for the Social Impact
Assessment. Socio-economic survey of representative sample households shall be conducted for
collection of information on current status of their living and magnitude of probable impact. The
qualitative research approach through Consultations and Focus Group Discussions with the primary
stakeholders shall also be adopted to gain a deeper understanding of the project impact. These
techniques also facilitate the involvement of the project affected people in the project and provide their
suggestions.
The various steps shall be adopted to conduct Social Impact Assessment which are described in the
Table 7.2 below:
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 301
Table 7.2: Steps taken to prepare SIA & RAP Reports
STEP: 1 Mobilization
Meeting and discussions with APMB
Reconnaissance Survey/ Site visit
STEP: 2 Desk Research
Review of relevant data and documents
Study of Detailed Project Report, Layout Drawing, Acts & Policies, Guidelines and other administrative documents
Collection of data/ information from Secondary Sources
Formulation of Data Collection instruments from primary sources
STEP: 3 Field Studies
Site Visit for verifying the impact zone on ground and identify the impact zones/ areas
Selection of Enumerators and Supervisors and their field training
(It consisted of detail discussions on Questionnaires and Data collection methods, sampling process, identification of project households etc.)
Discussions with local community and local people about the projects, its benefits and adversities.
Conduct of Socio-Economic Survey
Conduct of Public/ Community Consultations
Focused Group Discussions
STEP: 4 Data Processing & Data Analysis
Scrutiny of filled-in-Questionnaires
Coding, data entry & verification
Tabulation of data
Generation of trial and final tables and
Data analysis to prepare output tables
STEP: 5 Preparation of R&R Estimates
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 302
R&R Estimate shall be carried out after Census and Socio-economic Survey
STEP: 6 Generation of Reports
Generation of Draft SIA & RAP report
Final SIA & RAP reports after incorporating the comments and clarifications of Client.
Conventionally, the Census Survey shall be conducted for all affected families and sample Socio-economic survey shall be conducted for
approximately 25 percent of the Project Affected Families.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 303
PUBLIC CONSULTATIONS
Public Consultations/Focused Group Discussion shall be conducted with the Project Affected Persons
(PAPs) and relevant stakeholders at various locations in the project area. During public consultations
issues related to design of the project, benefits, land acquisition, compensation, income restoration,
employment generation, grievance redress, road access, safety etc. shall be discussed.
The Stakeholders consulted are a) primary stakeholders, who are affected persons and b) secondary
stakeholders, who are officials of Panchayats and local institutions. The consultations included the
following entities/ institutions as stakeholders.
Project Affected People
General Public
Head/ Sarpanch of the villages
PRIMARY PROJECT IMPACT AREA
This section provides an understanding of the demographic profile of the villages in the project affected
area, the social groups present, and the livelihood profile of the community. The purpose of this section
is to allow for an increased understanding of the key issues identified as well as identify areas of
intervention in future scenarios. As per the reconnaissance survey and Census of India 2011, there are
six numbers of hamlets namely Kothalingudu, Pathalingudu, Matchilesam Sunnapalle,
Reddikasunnapalle, Mulapeta and Vishnuchakram are coming under Rajapuram village. Out of these six
hamlets, the settlement of Mulapeta and Pathalingudu are impacted and attract Rehabilitation &
Resettlement due to the development of Proposed Bhavanapadu Greenfield Port. Hence, 100% Census
and 25% Socio-economic Survey shall be conducted of PAFs and Resettlement Action Plan shall be
prepared and implemented as per the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition,
Rehabilitation & Resettlement (Andhra Pradesh Amendment) Act, 2018 and RFCTLARR Act, 2013.
7.1.9.1 Household Composition of PAFs
As per the data presented in the Table 7.8, total population of sample PAFS are 281 in which 245 people
comes under 10 to 60 age group, 24 people comes below 10 years of age group and 12 people comes
above 60 years of age group. Further, out of the total population 153 (54.45%) are male and 128
(45.55%) are female. The gender ratio of the sample population is 836 females per thousand males.
Further, an average household size of the family is 3.12 person per family and all the families come
under the categories of Nuclear Family.
Table 7.3: Household Composition of the People of Affected Villages S. No. Age Group Male Female Total
1 10 to 60 Age Group 130 115 245
2 Children (Below 10 Years) 13 11 24
3 Aged (Above 60 years) 10 2 12
Total 153 128 281
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 304
Source: VSPL’s Socio-economic Survey November 2021
7.1.9.2 Social Stratification and Religion of PAFs
The data collected from Socio-economic survey reveals that almost all the sample families belong to the
Other Backwards Castes (OBC). No SC, ST and General Castes families reported during survey.
Further, in the village Pathlingadu and Mulapeta, people belong to the Hindu religion.
7.1.9.3 Land Holding Pattern of the PAFs
The data presented in Table 7.4 reveals that approximately 48.89% of PAFs have agricultural land
between 0.5 to 1 acres, 24.44% have agricultural land between 1 acre to 2 acres, 6.67% have between 3
to 5 acres and 20.00% do not possess any agricultural land i.e. they are landless. The average land
holding size of PAFs are up to 1 acre per families.
Table 7.4: Land Holding Pattern of PAFs S. No Land Holding Size (in Acre) Frequency Percentage
1 0.5 Acre to 1 Acres 44 48.89
2 >1 Acres to 2 Acres 22 24.44
3 >2 Acres to 5 Acres 6 6.67
4 >5 Acres to 10 0 0.00
5 Land Less 18 20.00
Total 90 100.00 Source: VSPL’s Socio-economic Survey November 2021
7.1.9.4 Occupational Pattern of the People of PAFs
The Table 4.14 presents occupational pattern of the people of sample PAFs. The Work Participation Rate
(WPR) of the people of the affected families are 53.38%. Majority of the occupation of the people of the
study area are either farmer or Labour. Approximately 35.33% people engaged in labour work followed
by agricultural work with 32.00%, agricultural labour with 25.33% service with 4.67%, fishing with 1.33%
and business with 0.33% only.
Table 7.5: Occupational Pattern of the People of affected Villages S. No. Occupation Frequency Percentage
1 Agriculture 48 32.00
2 Agricultural Labour 38 25.33
3 Business 2 1.33
4 Fishing 2 1.33
5 Labour 53 35.33
6 Service 7 4.67
Total 150 100.00 Source: VSPL’s Socio-economic Survey February 2021
7.1.9.5 Income Pattern of the PAFs
As per the data presented in Table 7.6, approximately 31.11% families come between Rs. 60,000/- to Rs.
1,00,000/- annual income group, 25.56% come between Rs. 1,00,000/- to Rs. 1,50,000/- annual income
group, 20% families come between Rs. 25,000/- to Rs. 600,000/- annual income group, 18.89% families
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 305
come between 1,50,000 to 3,00,000 annual income group and 4.44% families come above Rs. 3,00,000/-
annual income group. Therefore, it is evident that most of the families of affected villages have their
annual income between Rs. 50,000/ to Rs. 1,50,000/. An average income of the people of the affected
families are approximately Rs. 1,20,000/- per year. Further, based on the analysis made above and
outcome of public consultations, most of the people of the affected villages are depend on agriculture
or labour work for their livelihood. Jwar, makka, pulses, cotton, chillies are the major corps grown in this
region.
Table 7.6: Income Pattern of the PAFs S. No. Annual Income (in INR) Frequency Percentage
1 25,000 to 60,000 18 20.00
2 60,001 to 1,00,000 28 31.11
3 1,00,001 to 1,50,000 23 25.56
4 1,50,001 to 3,00,000 17 18.89
5 Above 3,00,001 4 4.44
Total 90 100.00 Source: VSPL’s Socio-economic Survey November 2021
7.1.9.6 Expenditure Pattern of the PAFs
The table below explain the annual expenditure pattern of the people of the study area. Out of the total
samples collected, approximately 55.56% people expend between Rs. 50,000 to Rs. 1,00,000 to fulfil
their daily needs like food, cooking fuel, cloths, health, education, communication, social functions and
agriculture etc. In the same way, approximately 33.33% people expend between Rs. 15,000 to Rs.
50,000 and 10% people expends between Rs. 1,00,000 to Rs. 1,50,000.
Table 7.7: Expenditure Pattern of the PAFs S. No. Annual Expenditure (in INR) Frequency Percentage
1 15,000 to 50,000 30 33.33
2 50,001 to 1,00,000 50 55.56
3 1,00,001 to 1,50,000 10 11.11
4 1,50,001 to 3,00,000 0 0.00
Total 90 100.00 Source: VSPL’s Socio-economic Survey November 2021
Based on the income and expenditure analysis it is concluded that the people of the study area comes
under low income group.
7.1.9.7 Possession of Durable Consumer Items
Table 7.8 presents status of durable consumer items possessed by PAFs. As per the table below 94.44%
sample families (90 PAFs) possess Mobile phone, 15.56% have Bicycle, 80.00% have Television, 1.11%
have Oven, 97.78% have LPG connections, 1.11% have Computer, 18.89% have Refrigerator, 7.78% have
Washing Machine, 24.44% have Motor Cycle, 4.44% have Car and 2.22% family possess Air conditioner.
Table 7.8: Possession of Durable Consumer Items S. No. Durable Consumer Item Frequency Percentage
1 Mobile 85 94.44
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 306
S. No. Durable Consumer Item Frequency Percentage
2 Bicycle 14 15.56
3 Television 72 80.00
4 Oven 1 1.11
5 LPG Connection 88 97.78
6 Computer 1 1.11
7 Refrigerator 17 18.89
8 Washing Machine 7 7.78
9 Motor Cycle 22 24.44
10 Car 4 4.44
11 AC 2 2.22 Source: VSPL’s Socio-economic Survey November 2021
7.1.9.8 Status and Role of Women in Economic Activities
Table 7.9 presents role and status of women in different economic and household activities. Out of the
total sample (90 PAFs) collected approximately 84.44% families accept that the female member of their
families engage in agricultural labour. In the same way, 44.44% families accept that female member of
their families are engage in household work, 13.33% non-agricultural labour, 11.11% in trade and
business, 6.67% in cultivation, 4.44% in service, 4.44% in household industry, 4.44% in collection and sell
of forest products and 3.33% accepts that the female member of their families engage in allied activities.
Table 7.9: Engagement of Women in Economic Activities S. No. Particular Frequency Percentage
1 Cultivation 6 6.67
2 Allied Activities 3 3.33
3 Collection and sell of forest Product 4 4.44
4 Trade and Business 10 11.11
5 Agricultural Labour 76 84.44
6 Non-Agricultural Labour 12 13.33
7 HH Industry 4 4.44
8 Service 4 4.44
9 Household Work 40 44.44
10 Others 6 6.67 Source: VSPL’s Socio-economic Survey November 2021
7.1.9.9 Role of Women in Decision Making
Out of the total sample collected approximately 96.56% PAFs accept that they take the advice of female
members also in daily household matters and jointly they take decision in different household matters.
Table 7.10: Role of Women in Decision Making of Households Matter S. No. Particulars Frequency Percentage
1 Financial Matters 12 13.33
2 Education of Child 76 84.44
3 Health Care of Child 83 92.22
4 Purchase of Assets 17 18.89
5 Day to day activities 74 82.22
6 Social Function and Marriage 22 24.44
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 307
S. No. Particulars Frequency Percentage
7 Others 7 7.78 Source: VSPL’s Socio-economic Survey November 2021
When it was asked that in which matters they allow their female members to have any says in decision
making; approximately 92.22% PAFs accept that they allow female members to have any says in health
care of child, 84.44% allow in education of child, 82.22% allow in day to day activities, 24.44% allow in
social function and marriage, 18.89% in purchase of assets, 13.33% in financial matters, 7.78% in others
household matters.
Hence, it may be concluded that the people of FAFs allow their female member to have any say in health
care of child, education of child and day to day activities. In these activities, role of female member is
significant and important. Whether as the role of female member is limited and insignificance in
financial matters, purchase of assets and social functions & marriage.
IMPACT ON LAND
As per the Detailed Project Report approximately 1010 Acres of land would be required for the
development of proposed Bhavanapadu Greenfield Port at Rajapuram village, Santhabomali Mandal,
Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh. Out of total land, approximately 320.05 acres of land shall be
acquired from patta land (private land), 234.44 acres from salt pan land, 122.06 acres from Coastal Belt
land, 66.54 acres from revenue land and 79.00 acres from waste land. In addition, approximately 184.92
acres of land shall also be required for external rail and road connectivity. While government land shall
be transferred from its respective department by APMB, the patta (private) land shall be acquired by
revenue department as per RFCTLARR (Andhra Pradesh Amendment) Act 2018. The details of land
proposed to be acquired has been summarized in Table 7.11.
Table 7.11: Details of Land to be Acquired/Transferred for the Proposed Project S. No. Type of Land Area (in Acre) Percentage
1 Coastal Belt Land 122.06 12.09
2 Forest Land 2.99 0.30
3 Revenue Land 66.54 6.59
4 Patta Land 320.05 31.69
5 Salt Pan Land 234.44 23.21
6 Waste Land 79.00 7.82
7 Rail Connectivity (External) 27.83 2.76
8 Road Connectivity (External) 127.09 15.55
Total Land 1010.00 100.00 Source: Detailed Project Report
IMPACT ON SETTLEMENT
As per Census of India 2011, total population of the Rajapuram village is 3316 and it is compounded into
783 households. As per the reconnaissance survey, socio-economic survey and Census of India, there
are six numbers of hamlets namely 1. Kothalingudu, 2. Pathalingudu, 3. Matchilesam Sunnapalle, 4.
Reddikasunnapalle, 5. Mulapeta and 6. Vishnuchakram are coming under Rajapuram village. Out of
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 308
these six hamlets, the settlement of Mulapeta and Pathalingudu are impacted and attract Rehabilitation
& Resettlement. Based on secondary data approximately 302 households in which 249 households in
Mulapeta and 53 households in Pathalingudu hamlets needs to be displaced due to the development of
Proposed Bhavanapadu Greenfield Port.
To understand the socio-economic profile of the affected villages, a socio-economic survey of 25% of
PAFs has been conducted in the month of November 2021 and analyzed. Census survey for the same is
under progress and after getting the data, R&R Plan shall be prepared and shall be implemented by
APMB as per Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation &
Resettlement (Andhra Pradesh Amendment) Act, 2018 and RFCTLARR Act, 2013.
REHABILITATION AND RESETTLEMENT BUDGET
Based on the findings of socio-economic survey outcomes and Census of India 2011, a tentative R&R
budget has been estimated. After completion of Census Survey, it shall be updated.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 309
Table 7.12: Rehabilitation and Resettlement Budget A. Land
S. No. Component Type of Land Unit
Rate/Acre Quantity Amount (Rs.)
1 Land Private Land 5,50,0001 320.05 17,60,27,500
2 Land for External Rail and Road Connectivity Private Land 5,50,000 184.92 10,17,06,000
A1 Cost of Land Acre
320.0500 27,77,33,500
A2 Multiplication Factor
2
55,54,67,000
A3 100% solatium of Land Cost 55,54,67,000
Total Acquisition Cost of Land 1,11,09,34,000
B. Structure
S. No. Component Unit Unit Rate Quantity Amount (Rs)
1 Permanent Structures Sq.m 9,000.00 36240 32,61,60,000
2 Semi-permanent Structures Sq.m 6,000.00 15100 9,06,00,000
3 Temporary Structures Sq.m 3,500.00 9060 3,17,10,000
B1 Cost of Structures 60400 44,84,70,000
B2 100% solatium of Total Structure Cost 44,84,70,000
Total Cost of Structure 89,69,40,000
C. CPR
S. No. Component Unit Unit Rate Quantity Amount (Rs)
1 School Nos. 25,00,000 2 50,00,000
2 Handpump Nos. 1,00,000 5 5,00,000
3 Bore-well Nos. 50,000 3 1,50,000
4 Community Sqm 20,000 1200 2,40,00,000
Total Cost of CPR 2,96,50,000
D. R&R
S. No. Component Unit Unit Rate Quantity Amount (Rs)
1 Employment Allowance Affected Family 5,00,000 302 15,10,00,000
2 Shifting allowance Displaced Family 50,000 302 1,51,00,000
3 Resettlement Allowance Affected Family 50,000 302 1,51,00,000
1 http://registration.ap.gov.in
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 310
4 Subsistence allowance Displaced Family 36000 302 1,08,72,000
5 Additional Subsistence Allowance for vulnerable households
Vulnerable Family 50,000 140 70,00,000
6 Grant for Artisans, Small traders, Petty shops and Cattle sheds
Affected Artisans, Small Traders, Petty Shops and Cattle Sheds
25,000 250 62,50,000
Total 20,53,22,000
E. Implementation
S. No. Component Unit Unit Rate Quantity Amount (Rs)
1 Training of Affected Households Affected Family 15,000 302 45,30,000
2 RP Implementation Agency Agency 1,50,00,000 1 1,50,00,000
3 Monitoring and Evaluation Consultant Consultant 45,00,000 1 45,00,000
4 Administrative Expenses Displaced Family 10,00,000 1 10,00,000
5 Dissemination of Resettlement Plan etc. Lumpsum 10,00,000 1 10,00,000
Total 2,60,30,000
F. Total R&R
S. No. Item Amount (Rs.)
1 Cost of Land 1,11,09,34,000
2 Cost of Structure 89,69,40,000
3 Cost of CPR Relocation & Enhancement 2,96,50,000
4 Cost of R&R Assistance 20,53,22,000
5 Cost of Implementation 2,60,30,000
G LA and R&R Cost 2,26,88,76,000
H Contingency @ 10% on G 22,68,87,600
I Total R&R Cost 2,49,57,63,600
Based on the above analysis, the total cost estimated for R&R is 249.57 Crore.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 311
7.2 RISK ASSESSMENT AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT PLAN
A severe accident has the potential to result in serious injury or death, as well as extensive
environmental or property damage and significant disruption in and around the port. To properly handle
the crisis, it may be necessary to enlist the help of outside emergency services. Plant/system failure,
human error, earthquake, car crash, or sabotage is all examples of common causes of accidents.
Emergency readiness, or recognizing potential scenarios and repercussions and preparing an onsite
emergency plan, is a crucial part of risk mitigation.
Maritime transport, by its nature, leads to a variety of hazardous conditions, such as collisions,
groundings and sinking’s, as well as mishaps involving the handling of the cargo. Port areas have long
been recognised as a complicated interaction between land and sea, human activity and the natural
environment, and multiple modes of transportation. Natural calamities such as cyclones, floods,
earthquakes, and tsunamis are all possible because of a port's geographic location. The ISPC Code and
Dock Workers Regulations compliance requirements are an on-going procedure that promotes port
safety and security.
In most port regions, a high number and variety of potentially hazardous activities are taking place in
close proximity to one another. Port areas are frequently developed regions near homes and other
municipal facilities, and are occasionally located near valuable fisheries, wildlife habitats, and recreation
places. An event in one sector of the port could have far-reaching consequences for the local
population, the environment, and other port facilities. The important aspects for achieving the
objectives of these Disaster Management Action Plans are incident prevention through preparedness,
response, and mitigation, backed up with suitable resources.
DISASTER MANAGEMENT PLAN
Emergency/disaster is an undesirable occurrence of events of such magnitude and nature that
adversely affect operations, cause loss of human lives and property as well as damage to the
environment. Coastal infrastructure is vulnerable to various kinds of natural and manmade disasters.
Examples of natural disaster are Flood, Cyclone, Tsunami, Earthquake etc., and manmade disasters
like major fire, explosion, sudden heavy leakage of toxic/poisonous chemicals etc. An effective disaster
management plan helps to minimize the losses in terms of human lives, assets and environmental
damage. A typical Distarter Management Plan is presented in Figure 7.1
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 312
Figure 7.1: Disaster Management Chart
OBJECTIVE OF RISK ASSESSMENT AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT PLAN (DMP)
DMP should be developed to make best possible use of the resources available in the operational area
as well as outside available resources like State Fire Services, Police, Civil Defence, Hospitals, Civil
Administration, neighbouring institution and industries.
The objectives of Disaster Management Plan are:
To contain and control the incident.
To rescue the victim and treat them suitably in quickest possible time.
To safeguard other personnel and evacuate them to safer places.
To identify personnel affected/dead.
To give immediate warning signal to the people in the surrounding areas in case such
situation arising.
To inform relatives of the casualties.
To safeguard important records & information about the organization.
To preserve damaged records & equipment needed as evidence for any subsequent
enquiry.
To rehabilitate the affected areas.
To restore the facilities to normal working condition at the earliest.
Andhra Pradesh state Disaster Management authority has prepared Disaster Management Plan for
cyclone, storm surges, floods and droughts. The Revenue department is primarily responsible for
emergency response and relief (DM Act - Section 12(2)(b)) in the State, while the Andhra Pradesh State
Disaster Management Authority (APSDMA) is designated as the nodal agency for formulation of
policies, long-term planning, coordination and monitoring body for mitigation, reduction and
preparedness for disasters in the State (DM Act - Section 12). Disaster management plans exist at state
and District levels in Andhra Pradesh. The Chief Minister is the chairperson of State Disaster
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 313
Management Authority (SDMA). The District Collector is the chairman of the District Disaster
Management Authority (DDMA). DDMA will look into all the aspects of disaster management
including mitigation preparedness, response and relief at District level.
Standard operating procedures and action plan in case of manmade disasters like oil spill, fire
accident, ship/vessel collision etc., at port shall be developed. Port shall be well equipped to deal with
oil spill contingency, fire hazard, ship/vessel collision etc.
BASIC DEFINITIONS
On-Site Plans - Address incidents originating within the port area whereas Off-Site Plans address
incidents originating outside the port area but affecting the port operations or from port to outside
Risk - Risks defined as the chance of an adverse event occurring in some period of time or in a specific
circumstance, in the process of engaging in an activity
Hazard - A hazard is a phenomenon which may cause disruption to persons and their infrastructure;
and is an undesirable outcome in the process of engaging in an activity
Disaster - An event which can cause immense damage and disruption to the (Port and its) infrastructure
causing loss to lives and property;
An Emergency is a serious sudden situation or occurrence that happens unexpectedly and demands
immediate action to correct or to protect lives and/or property.
A Crisis-is an unstable situation of extreme danger and may lead to the following elements; - Surprise- -
Rapid flow of events-Lack of or insufficient information-Internal conflict-confusion
Disaster Management- is a set of actions and processes designed to lessen disastrous effects before,
during and after a disaster.
Preparedness-are those measures undertaken in advance to ensure that individuals and agencies will be
ready to react, such as emergency plans, logistical support and resource, inventories, and emergency
information & communications systems
Response - Those measures undertaken immediately after a disastrous or hazardous event has occurred
and for a limited period of time thereafter, primarily to save human life, property, treating the injured,
prevent further injury and other forms of property loss and to mitigate disruption. They include
response plan activation, declaration and communication of emergency to the concerned potential
population and facilities at risk, opening and staffing of emergency operation centres, mobilization of
resources, issuance of warnings and directions and provision of aid.
Mitigation - Those measures and activities aimed at reducing or eliminating hazards or lessening the
impact of the event.
Prevention - Mitigation of hazard effects through public education, early warning or detection systems,
safety systems, building and land-use codes and regulation,
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 314
Recovery - Those measures undertaken to restore normal conditions. The time frame for recovery
begins as soon as a reduction in critical response activities permits the re-allocation of resources and
could include physical restoration and reconstruction.
EMERGENCY AT PORT
An Emergency at Port area is a situation which the management of the area involved (incident area)
cannot control with the resources normally available to them and which threatens large number of
people, large area of port, and health & safety of the public in the vicinity. A emergency of this nature
will be extremely rare, the most likely cause being an instantaneous event such as an explosion, major
fire or release of substantial quantity of toxic material or natural disasters like flood, earthquake,
cyclone or unrest due to political bandh / strike or terrorism etc. Each business area will have its own
emergency instructions to combat the situations arising out of these emergencies. They are to be used
in conjunction with these procedures. There will be an emergency organization for dealing with such
emergencies response departments shall coordinate as per roles and responsibilities defined for these
departments. It is understood that each and every action cannot be specified due to dynamic nature of
these emergencies. All coordinators shall ensure smooth functioning and demonstrate highest team
spirit during the emergency. To make the procedures updating easier, telephone directory is separately
prepared by communication department. This document is intended for use in an actual emergency.
EMERGENCY CLASSIFICATION
Level 1- It is an Incident within the port and is of a minor nature with a low level of personnel injury,
interruption to work, damage level and loss of capability. It can be handled by the Port Staff involving
Marine and other depts. The Emergency Management group leader is the Dept Head. E.g. Building/Shed
Fire, Elec Supply disruption, labour accident, vessel accidents
Level 2- It is an Incident within the port area and is of a limited and moderate level of personnel injury,
possible death(s), interruption of work, damage to port. Besides Port resources, outside assistance may
be required. The Disaster Management group leader is the Port Chairman. E.g. Oil Spills, Terminal Fires/
Explosions
Level 3-It is a disaster of a severe and critical nature and could have a high level of personnel injury (and
deaths), interruption to work, damage to port and loss of capability. It affects the port and possibly
adjacent areas. Besides Port resources, assistance from outside agencies is required. If incident affects
Port, group leader is chairman and if it affects outside, then information will be given to District
Collector depending on the intensity, e.g., Gas Leaks, Chemical/Oil Spills, Fires/ Explosions & Cyclones.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 315
Table 7.13: Bhavanapadu Port– Area Vulnerability & Threat Matrix x=slightly variable: xx=moderately vulnerable; xxx=highly vulnerable
Threats
Vulnerable Areas
Vessel Accidents Collision
Grounding Fire
Explosion
Land Transport Personnel Accident Rail Road
Fire & Explosion Manifold Pipeline
Toxic Gas
Leakage Pipeline
Manifold
Pollution Oil
Chemical
Terrorism Bomb War
Arson Cyber
Technical Failures Power
Transport Communication Infrastructure
Occupational Accidents
Strikes
Cyclone Floods
Tsunami Earthquake
Vessel movement
Approach channel xxx xxx x x x x x x x
Turning Basin x x x x x x x x
Coal Berths xx x xx x x x x x
Cargo Berth x x x x x x x xx x
Fishing Harbour x x x x x x x x x
Storage Transfer
Coal stack yards x xx xx xx x x x x
Cargo Transfer
Pipelines xxx
Trucks/ Mobile equipment
x x x x x x x x
Train-track roads x x x x x x x x x
Cranes & Ship Loaders
xx x x x x
Bulk cargo conveyor
x x x x x x
Services
Control gates x
Emergency Generators
x x x x xx xx
Electric substations
x x x x x x x
Train siding, wagons
x x x x x x
Signal station x x x x x
Fire station x x x x x
Administration
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 316
Threats
Vulnerable Areas
Vessel Accidents Collision
Grounding Fire
Explosion
Land Transport Personnel Accident Rail Road
Fire & Explosion Manifold Pipeline
Toxic Gas
Leakage Pipeline
Manifold
Pollution Oil
Chemical
Terrorism Bomb War
Arson Cyber
Technical Failures Power
Transport Communication Infrastructure
Occupational Accidents
Strikes
Cyclone Floods
Tsunami Earthquake
Administration building & Parking
x x x x
Customs Area & Weigh bridge
x x
Port officers x x
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 317
Table 7.14: Event Scenarios Bhavanapadu Port Probability- Low (once every 10-50 years); Moderate (once every 2-10 years); High (once annually)
Impact/ Preparedness/ Risk/ Threat- 0=Very Low; 1=Low; 2=moderate; 3=High
Event
Scenario Spectrum
Early warning
Probability of Occurrence
Duration Impact Impact on Property
Impact on People
Time to Restore Facilities
Risk Threat
Cyclone 96-12h High 36-72 h 3 3 7-30 days High
Floods 96-12h Moderate 96 h 2 2 7-20 days Moderate
Earthquake/ Tsunami 5-8 h Moderate Seconds to minutes
2 2 7-20 days Moderate
V/L Accident
Collision <1 min Low <1 h 0 0 2 - 4 h Low
Grounding <1 min Low 1 - 48 h 0 0 1 - 48 h Low
Fire/ Explosion <1 min Low 0.5 - 12 h 1 - 2 1 - 2 12 - 96 h Moderate
Transport Accident
Rail <1 min Low <1 min 0 1 1-3 days Low
Road Accident <1 min Low <1 min 0 1 1 day Low
Pollution
Oil Spill <1 min Moderate 1 - 12 h 0 1 2 - 3 days Moderate
Fire-Admin Building <1 min Low 1 - 72 h 1 1 12 - 96 h Low
Parking/ Gates <1 min Low 1 - 12 h 0 1 12 – 24 h Low
Function Failure
Elec. Sub-station <1 min Moderate 1 - 24 h 0 0 12 - 48 h Low
Emergency Generator <1 min Moderate 1 - 24 h 0 0 12 - 48 h Low
Pipelines failure <1 min Moderate 1 - 24 h 0 1 12 - 48 h Low
Evacuation routes <1 min Low 1 - 24 h 0 1 12 - 48 h Low
Fire Alarm Failure <1 min Moderate 1 - 24 h 0 1 12 - 48 h Low
Fire Station Failure <1 h Moderate 1 - 24 h 0 1 12 - 48 h Low
Water System <1 h Moderate 1 - 24 h 0 0 12 - 48 h Low
Communications <1 h Low 1 - 24 h 0 1 12 - 48 h Low
Medical facilities <1 day Moderate 1 - 24 h 1 12 - 48 h Low
Sewerage failure <1 h Moderate 1 - 24 h 0 1 12 - 48 h Low
Human related
Labour Action/ Strike 24 h Moderate 1 - 2 day 0 0 12 - 48 h Low
Civil disturbance <1 day Moderate 1 - 2 day 0 0 12 - 48 h Low
Terrorism & War
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 318
Event
Scenario Spectrum
Early warning
Probability of Occurrence
Duration Impact Impact on Property
Impact on People
Time to Restore Facilities
Risk Threat
State of War <7 day Low >7 day 0 3 >48 h Moderate
Bomb Threat <3 h Low 1 - 96 h 0 2 >48 h Moderate
Hostage Threat <3 h Low 1 - 96 h 0 1 >48 h Moderate
Mass Casualty <5 h Low 1 - 96 h 0 2 >48 h Moderate
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 319
COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS
Communications take on particular importance in a disaster or emergency situation. Depending on the
type and scale of the emergency, the requirements for communications (including mobile
communications) may increase as emergency operations grow. Responders must receive timely,
accurate information about the emergency in order to respond appropriately; to coordinate efforts, to
determine priorities based on needs and availability of resources, to determine the need for outside
resources, and to make requests for assistance.
Information management surrounding a disaster is confronted with several unique challenges.
The situation itself is often radically different from normal. Detailed information is needed
about circumstances that people may find difficult to acknowledge, and still more difficult to
describe.
The need for fast, appropriate response is much greater than usual; hence the demands for
quick, accurate information are dramatically increased.
Information may reach decision makers at a much faster rate and from many more sources
than normal; on the other hand, it is also possible that there will be gaps in time both before
initial field reports, and between subsequent reports.
Information received is at greater risk of being incomplete, inaccurate, contradictory or
duplicated than under normal circumstances.
Normal means of communication overloaded, damaged, destroyed or otherwise unavailable, making it
difficult to get crucial information to those who need it.
The PORT relies for most of its internal communications upon its own private communications networks
and systems. These include the telephone network, data communications networks and VHF. For
additional telecommunication needs, the Port also depends on the public telephone networks for local
calls outside of the Port, and cellular phones. Following a disaster, it is very likely that the public
switched networks will become over-loaded for some time and that normal telephone communications
will be disrupted in some manner. Cellular telephone systems are also likely to be overloaded and/or
interrupted at times. Also, depending on the nature of the disaster or emergency, some portions of the
Ports internal telecommunications networks as well as data communications networks may not be
operable. Similarly, with regard to two-way radio systems, the volume of traffic will increase drastically
in the aftermath of a widespread disaster. It is anticipated that with any of the communication systems
that there will be more requests to talk immediately after the disaster than available capacity
throughout the system. Users will be instructed to refrain from using these systems for nonessential
transmissions during and following a major emergency or disaster.
Vulnerability is partly a function of the degree of protection available to potential victims as a result of a
disaster. Improved warning reduces vulnerability. Warning' incorporates the communication of risk in
times of impending emergencies, with the purpose of obtaining public protective actions through the
implementation of the Disaster Management Plan.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 320
WARNING SYSTEM
Disaster Management Plan has various types of warnings through hooters/sirens with local and
indication in control room, depending on the location of emergency as specified below:
1. First Level Warning - For an accident within any respective facility or storage terminal. Hooter - short,
intermittent. After sounding the hooter, the message should be sent to the main gate/radio room.
2. Second Level Warning - When the Main Controller perceives the affected area to be the entire
installation but which can be confined within facility limits. Siren - Wailing short intermittent siren
3. Third level Warning - When the Main Controller considers the accident would assume off-site
implications. Siren - Wailing long and short intermittent siren.
4. All clear long continuous siren lasting 1 minute.
Table 7.15: Communication Network Elements within the Port on Site
Communication Network
Elements
Function
Internal Fire Service Special fire alarm and normal communication system-
VHF-TELEPHONE-EPABX-WALKIE TALKIE- MOBILE
Forward control UHF/VHF Transceivers-normal communication systems in reserve
Personal and internal
Medical services
Normal communication services
Fire fighting craft and
Rescue launches
UHF/VHF Radio telephones, Via port authorities as reserve
Ships at Berth Normal UHF/VHF Radio telephone link used in cargo operations..Terminal
representative at tanker berth to also have own radio-SATCOM
Civil authorities
Including fire services,
Police and medical
Services
Direct telephone link with failure alarm, UHF/VHF radio telephone or public
telephone system. SATCOM
Cascade system to be used i.e. through dept. heads to subordinates
Enable keep lines clear
Harbour authorities,
Pilots, tugs and other
harbour craft
UHF/VHF Radio telephone or public telephone
SATCOM
District Collector or State
Secretary
UHF/VHF Radio telephone, public telephone-hot line for emergency level 2 & 3-
SATCOM
Jt Secretary-MOSt New
Delhi
Public telephone-hot line for emergency level 2 & 3 SATCOM
Table 7.16: Bhavanapadu Communication Contact Numbers
MANAGEMENT MOBILE VHF
K. Murlidharan (CEO) +91-8879972997
GV Raghava Rao (SE) +91-9440897595
Site office To Be given
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 321
PORT CONTROL ROOM (EMERGENCY CONTROL CENTRE)
EQUIPMENTS:
Port water line to be backed with alternate supply.
Automatic display name, address, telephone numbers of any incoming call once the
Emergency Control Centre number is dialed, the same thing should be registered on the
computer
Flip up of maps & which:
shows First Aid locations
shows terminals storing toxic chemicals and terminals storing flammable chemicals
gives transportation map depicting transportation route for hazardous cargo by road and rail
tankers
Assembly points, fire hydrant.
Table 7.17: Emergency Control Centre at Signal Station Nos Equipment Remarks
1 Bsnl Satellite Phone With Battery Backup
2 Vhf Sets With Battery Backup
2 Telephones Power supply not required
8 Walkie Talkie Sets & Mobile With battery backup and mobiles at main gate, Admin office
and various other activity areas
24 Charts All over the working areas
6 Emergency Lights And Torche In all Site offices and activity areas
2 Portable Pa/Loud Hailer Set Four in Harbour area and , Coal Stack Yard and Clean Cargo
Yard,
With Emergency Generator-Dry Food &
Water For 72hours
For emergency
Table 7.18: Central Disaster Management Control Room
S.No EQUIPMENT NOS
1 Emergency lights and torches 6
2 TV 1
3 Radio 1
4 Computer 1
5 Scanner/Fax and Printer 1
6 SATCOM set with backup power 1
7 Telephone hotline-State Govt with sound proof cubicle 1
8 Telephone hotline-Ministry of Shipping with sound proof cubicle 1
9 Telephone-one for incoming ;second for outgoing calls 2
10 Overhead slide projector 1
11 White board and coloured marker pens 1
12 Tape recorders 1
13 SBA System-Simultaneous broadcasting and selective broadcasting-optional 4
14 Walkie talkies/mobile telephone 6
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 322
S.No EQUIPMENT NOS
15 VHF sets-marine 1
16 VHF Sets-Non Marine-Police 2
17 Video camera 1
18 Binoculars 1
19 Computer software for spill scenarios & Chemical Hazards 1
20 Disaster Management Response plan-Ref Manuals-Chemical Encylopedia 2
21 Table-seating 1
22 Tables-for equipment 4
23 Chairs 10
24 Stationary- Flip charts
INITIATION OF CENTRAL CONTROL ROOM -ON DISASTER LEVEL (I), (II) AND (III)
Chairman Port will decide when members of the Central Disaster Management Group will operate from
their respective dept control rooms and attend joint meetings at the Central Disaster Management
Control Room or when total central control room attendance is required. Whenever the Central Disaster
Management centre takes over responsibilities the On-Site Action Group now reports to the Central
control Room.
FIRE & EXPLOSION
A fire incident is described as the destruction or partial destruction by fire of a building or its contents.
The spread of fire can be very fast. Prompt and well-directed action can be decisive in escaping a major
fire loss. The biggest single need usually is not personnel and equipment. Most often it is the ability to
respond quickly and to confine the fire to manageable limits before it reaches the disaster stage. As
soon as the Fire & Safety Section arrives they will take charge of the scene, initiate the Incident
Command System and appoint a Fire Coordinator.
It is within the purview of the Fire & Safety Section to:
Evaluate the situation.
Determine equipment and manpower needs.
Notify appropriate agencies for assistance.
Confine and extinguish structural fires to area of origin and prevent additional exposure.
Reduce or eliminate structural damage and risk to persons.
Conduct rescue and lifesaving.
Provide medical services.
With the concerned Department conduct a fire investigation to determine point of origin and
cause.
Facilitate in returning structures back to service as soon as possible
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 323
Table 7.19: Methods of Dealing with Different Types of Fires & Leakage
Types Methods
Fires from minor oil spillage on deck
or jetty
Use dry chemical or foam extinguishers or water fog or water spray
Fire from large spillage of oil or burst
hose on deck or jetty
Use large dry chemical appliance and follow up with foam or water
fog/spray. Cool surrounding area/risks with water spray
Fires from spillage of oil on
surrounding waters
Emulsification of oil with water jets or apply foam coverage as appropriate
-Electrical Fires
-Fire in buildings-canteen
Switch off power-use CO2 or dry chemical extinguishers
Fire in office involving combustible
material
Use dry powder fire extinguishers-water spray, Use Breathing apparatus.
Fire in cargo tanks Use foam or steam smothering.
FIRE IN COAL STORAGE
Coal is a potential fire hazard; coal storage requires careful study from the point of view of safety. Fire
in coal stock is also a major source of environmental pollution. In order to avoid these hazards, coal
storage facilities require careful evaluation in respect of fire safety, keeping in mind the
characteristics of the different types of coal used in the industries.
RISK FACTORS
Self-heating of coal to its ignition temperature, resulting in what is called spontaneous combustion, is a
phenomenon identified with coal storage in industries. Virtually all grades of coal (except high grade
anthracite) are vulnerable to spontaneous heating and ignition. Although the precise cause of the
spontaneous combustion of coal is not well defined, it is believed that when coal is freshly mined, the
fresh surface of coal pieces liberates absorbed hydrocarbons, chiefly methane (in varying
amounts), After the escape of the absorbed gases, the exposed surface of coal particles gets oxidized
by the oxygen in the ambient air. The oxidation is very slow but heat is generated in the process. If the
heat is not allowed to dissipate, the temperature of the coal may rise gradually but sufficiently enough
to cause the mass to ignite. It is also believed that this self-heating of coal usually occurs in about 90 to
120 days after the coal is extracted in mining operations.
Oxidation in coal stacks takes place mainly from loosely packed coal stacks and the consequent
availability of oxygen in the voids of the stacks. The rate of oxidation is high at the outer surface of
the stacks because of the availability of abundant oxygen there. The rise in temperature,
however, cannot be detected due to the dissipation of heat by air movement. This zone extends
roughly up to a depth of 0.5 m. The situation beyond this zone, say up to a depth of 1.5 m, is
different. The coal in this zone also different. The coal in this zone also oxidizers fairly rapidly in the
presence of adequate quantity of air entering the stack, but the heat generated in the course of this
reaction is generally partially dissipated through convection and conduction. The heat transfer from
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 324
this zone depends on factors like ambient temperature, rate of air movement around that zone, free
moisture available in the material and thermal conductivity. The residual heat thus present in this
zone further raises the temperature of the coal mass until it attains the critical (threshold)
temperature i.e., the auto ignition temperature. Once it reaches critical temperature, the coal in the
zone starts burning and smoking and eventually erupts in flames. Proneness to spontaneous
combustion, therefore, can be determined by ascertaining the critical oxidation temperature or
crossing point. The lower the crossing point, the more is the proneness to self- heating.
All types of coal, when exposed to the atmosphere, are liable to suffer deterioration of quality
through surface oxidation, but the extent of deterioration differs from type to type. Lignite is a type
of brown coal containing a high percentage of volatiles. It is subject to weathering much more
rapidly than bituminous coal. It contains a large percentage of moisture (as much as 40%) as mined, of
which nearly 20% exists even before it is mined. Under dry hot ambient conditions, particularly in
India where temperature in a shed could go up to 450C and humidity to less than 30%, lignite oxidation
rate could be high. The rate of release of carbon monoxide which is indicative of the oxidation rate
may be as high as 70 m3 of CO per ton of lignite, which is about 100 times that of normal bituminous
coal. It has also been observed that in large coal storage yards left undisturbed for long periods,
smouldering takes place at the surface layers of the pile. In case of lignite, this phenomenon is more
rapid. Highly volatile coal is particularly liable to spontaneous combustion.
SAFEGUARDS/GUIDELINES TO ENSURE SAFETY IN COAL STORAGE YARD/SHED
Storage of large quantities of coal requires two conditions to be met viz. (i) avoidance of deterioration
in quality and (ii) avoidance of heating in the pile. While neither of the conditions can be fulfilled
completely, deterioration and risk of fire can be reduced to a minimum by careful manipulation of
the conditions of storage.
As basic necessary steps to avoid spontaneous heating in coal storage, the following guidelines are
recommended:
The ground or floor where coal is to be stored should be thoroughly cleaned of leaves, grass,
weds, pieces of wood, cotton waste or other organic waste and precautions taken to prevent
such matter from getting under, into or on the coal pile.
There should not be any steam or hot process pipelines or openings or sewers under, into,
through or adjacent to coal piles.
The storage site should be provided with drainage facility to prevent accumulation of water on
the ground.
Special attention should be given to monitoring of the coal stack, floor temperature in excess of
420C.
The stack should be planned so as to facilitate dissipation of heat by wind from the surface of
the stack. Any barrier / obstruction to wind should be removed.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 325
Newly broken fines of coal are more susceptible to spontaneous heating. Avoid dropping coal
from heights while piling and keep watch on newly broken fines of coal.
Avoid conical piles; this storage should be built up in layers by roll packing; this helps to exclude
oxygen and thus prevents fires by discouraging spontaneous heating.
Avoid alternative wetting and drying or keeping one part of the pile wet and another dry. If
such a situation arises, look out especially for spots where spontaneous heating occurs to take
proper corrective measures.
Coal stack should be limited in height. Low grade coal should not be piled higher than 3 m and
best grade not higher than 10 m to 12 m unless it is piled by the roll packing method. Coal
should be stored in mixed sizes as too many fines will be hazardous.
Do not allow any standing timber or pipes, poles, etc. in the piles. These may give rise to
formation of duct which allows sluggish air flow which may be sufficient for heating the coal but
not sufficient to dissipate the heat.
It is recommended to locate coal yards at least 6 m to 7 m away from any important buildings
and other combustible storage areas.
While selecting the site, it is to be kept in mind that all parts of the coal stock are accessible for
regular inspection and monitoring.
A well designed and well-maintained coal stack and a systematic consumption of coal from storage yard
are fundamental to fire safety in the storage of coal in industries.
PREVENTION OF SPREAD OF COAL STOCK FIRES
During the period of low off take, coal stock generally tends to build up to alarming levels. Since most
of the grades of coal are susceptible to spontaneous ignition if it is undisturbed for a certain period of
time, risk of fire exists in coal stacks. Following are the recommended precautions for preventing
spread of coal stock fire:
Consumption of coal should be done on first in-first out basis.
Some sealant and protective coatings are commercially available. The manufacturers claim that
by spraying these chemicals over the coal heaps, the probability of spontaneous ignition of coal
can be reduced. It is believed that these coatings form a film on the surface of the coal lumps
which reduces the chances of oxidation.
Check the temperature of the coal pile regularly if heating has been known to occur. Specific
attention should be given to the sloped sides of the piles where vulnerable air pockets exist. If
pile temperature exceeds 700C, open the pile and place the overheated material in a separate
small pile or use it promptly.
Inspection of stack is required to detect smouldering and organize removal / consumption of
the smouldering coal on priority and to extinguish the flames in time. Such inspections are vital
after the rains as water falling on the surface and penetrating the coal pile may aggravate and
accelerate spontaneous heating by assisting oxidation.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 326
Coal having high moisture content should be stored separately, if possible, and used promptly.
RE PROTECTION AND FIREFIGHTING
During selection of storage sites, it is to be ascertained that all parts of the stack are accessible
to mobile appliances for quenching fire in case of an emergency.
The entire coal yard should be protected with a water hydrant system. Hydrant heads need not
necessarily be equidistant from each other. They should be distributed in the stock yard in such
a way as to provide protection on all sides. Atleast one hydrant post should be provided for
every 30 m. in the area.
The capacity of the static water storage exclusively reserved for hydrant purpose should be
done as per the Fire Protection Manual, part-I, issued by the Tariff Advisory Committee (TAC).
The storage yard should also be provided with at least two hoses, each of 15 m length and
nozzles of not less than 16 mm diameter and not more than 25 mm diameter, kept in readiness
for use during fire emergency. While selecting the place of installation of hose reels, it is to be
seen that no part of the premises is more than 6m from a nozzle when the hoses are fully
extended.
During fire fighting, the fire fighters should dig out and remove the coal in the heated zone as
promptly as possible and then sufficient water can be applied to chill the burning coal below its
ignition point and thereby to extinguish the fire. During fire fighting operation, it is advisable to
keep a safe distance from the coal stock. Sometimes the water that penetrates the stock may
encounter a very hot spot and may be insufficient to quench the same. The water then turns
into steam that bursts out of the pile with considerable force.
The other recommended practice is to insert 50 mm pipes perforated with 9mm holes into the stack
of the affected zone. Water is then supplied through a hose attached to the upper end of the pipes.
This method of fighting coal stack fire is preferred because water can quickly cool the affected burning
coal to below its ignition temperature or cut off the air supply around the area due to formation of
steam.
FIRE FIGHTING FACILITIES
It is proposed to provide the following infra-structural Fire Fighting Services.
a) Underground/Surface Water Tank for Fire Fighting:
As per NBC 2016 Most Critical Water storage is for G+2 Administrative Building which is 10-15 m
Height Category. As per Table-7 of NBC Part -4. The required Capacity of Underground Tank is
50000 Litres.
b) Provision of Fire Fighting as/NBC 2016
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 327
As per Table No. 7 of NBC 2016 Part-4 Fire & life Safety Following Provision are made in the
Proposed Buildings:
Provision of Fire Fighting in Administrative Building
Fire Extinguisher has been proposed.
First Aid Hose reel has been proposed
Down Comer as well as Wet Riser is proposed
Manual Fire Alarm System is Proposed in Staircase & Lobby
Automatic fire Alarm System is proposed in complete building
Yard Hydrant is not required as/NBC But Proposed as the All pumps are required to be
installed
Terrace Tank of 5,000 Litre as Required by NBC-2016 has been proposed on Terrace.
Terrace Pump of 450 LPM is proposed with Terrace Pump for Fire Fighting.
1 No. Main Hydrant Pump of 1620 LPM Is Proposed along with 1 No. diesel pump of 1620 LPM
1 No. Jockey Pumps is Proposed of 180 LPM
Underground Tank of 50,000 Litre is required.
Provision of Fire Fighting for Workshop Building
Fire Extinguisher has been proposed.
First Aid Hose reel has been proposed
Down Comer as well as Wet Riser is proposed
Manual Fire Alarm System is Proposed in Staircase & Lobby
Automatic fire Alarm System is proposed in complete building
Yard Hydrant is not required as/NBC But Proposed as the All pumps are required to be
installed
Terrace Tank of 20,000 Litre as Required by NBC-2016 has been proposed on Terrace.
Terrace Pump of 450 LPM is proposed with Terrace Pump for Fire Fighting.
1 No. Main Hydrant Pump of 1620 LPM Is Proposed along with 1 No. diesel pump of 1620 LPM
1 No. Jockey Pumps is Proposed of 180 LPM
Underground Tank of 75,000 Litre is required.
Provision of Fire Fighting for Ware house
Fire Extinguisher has been proposed.
Yard Hydrant is proposed with First Aid Hose Reel.
Terrace Tank of 10,000 Litre as Required by NBC-2016 has been proposed on Terrace.
Terrace Pump of 450 LPM is proposed with Terrace Pump for Fire Fighting.
1 No. Main Hydrant Pump of 1620 LPM Is Proposed along with 1 No. diesel pump of 1620 LPM
1 No. Jockey Pumps is Proposed of 180 LPM
Underground Tank of 50,000 Litre is required.
Provision of Fire Fighting for Jetty, Coal yard, substation and control room
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 328
Fire hydrant system shall be installed at appropriate locations in berth, coal and break bulk stack yards,
sub-stations and control rooms etc.
INTERNAL FIRE HYDRANT SYSTEM
Administrative Building shall be provided with separate fire hydrant riser connected to the twin outlet
fire hydrant landing valve with fire hose cabinet consisting of swinging hose reel, fire man’s axe, 63 mm
dia canvas hoses and nozzles.
EXTERNAL HYDRANTS / RING /FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION
Externally, a fire fighting ring main of 150 mm diameter shall be provided around Administrative
Building, Workshop and Warehouses. External yard hydrants shall be suitably located at 45
metercentres.
There will be a set of fire department inlet connections with 4 Nos. 63 mm dia male outlets, located
externally. These inlets will have connections to the main riser as well as to the fire hydrant static
storage tank.
PORTABLE FIRE EXTINGUISHERS
Portable fire extinguishers of following type are proposed in Administrative Building, Workshop and
Substation Buildings.
Carbon Dioxide (CO2) fire extinguisher of 4.5 kg. capacity cartridge type conform to IS 2878
/15683
ABC powder type fire extinguisher as per IS : 13849 /15683 of 6 kg capacity
D.C.P. type fire extinguisher 9 kg capacity cartridge type with Gun Metal cap 150 gram CO2 gas
cartridge, powder and brackets conforming to IS 2171-1985 (v). Reference &
Standards used for Design of Building Services
National Building code of India 2016 Part-IV for Fire Fighting Services
National Building Code of India 2016 Part IX Plumbing Services
NOMOGRAM OF HAZEN AND WILLIAM.S EQUATION
IS 2065 : 1983 Code of practice for water supply in buildings (second revision)
SP 35 : 1987 Handbook on water supply and drainage with special emphasis on plumbing
CPHEO Manual for Water Supply System
CPHEO manual for Drainage
3844 : 1989 Code of practice for installation and maintenance of internal fire hydrants and
hose reels on premises (first revision)
15105 : 2002 Design and installation of fixed automatic sprinkler fire extinguishing system
Table 7.20:Bhavanapdu Fire Fighting Resources BHAVANAPADU PORT FIRE FIGHTING RESOURCES –Capacity- Specs Nos
Foam Tender 03
Water Tender 02
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 329
BHAVANAPADU PORT FIRE FIGHTING RESOURCES –Capacity- Specs Nos
DCP Tender 01
Large Trailer pump 01
High Expansion Foam Generator 02
Portable pumps petrol 01
Chain Saw 02
High Volume Long Range Water Monitor 02
Ground Monitor 02
Hose (Delivery Hose for Fire Fighting) 80
Floating Pump 02
Breathing Apparatus Sets 10
Proximity Suit 02
Fire Suits 02
Walkie-Talkie Sets for communication 06
Battery Operated Cutter 01
High Visibility Jacket 12
Lifebuoy 20
Life Jacket 20
Bolt Cutter 02
Safety Helmet 12
Portable Lamp Box 04
Flood Light 03
Fire Man Axe 02
Spade 04
Torch Light 06
Pick Axe 04
Lifting Bag 02
Circular Saw 02
Table 7.21: Fixed Fire Fighting Equipment- Tanker Jetty
Type Nos
Tower Monitor Foam 2
Base Monitor 2
Jumbo Water Curtain 4
Jumbo Jet 14
Hydrants 32
EVACUATION
There are a number of emergencies that could require evacuation. In some instances there must be
immediate evacuation. Full evacuation is often not needed. It should only be done if there is very high
risk to life. The more people to be evacuated, the greater the possibility of casualties during evacuation.
In an emergency, PORT employees and various tenant agencies have a responsibility to assist evacuating
the public.
If the decision is made to evacuate:
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 330
Evacuation must be accomplished quietly, without panic and in an orderly manner. Injuries
suffered during evacuation due to panic or confusion can be as serious as those resulting from
the actual emergency.
Evacuation routes and pre-designated assembly areas should be identified in facility safety
meetings and exercises.
If only a small number of people must be controlled, evacuation instructions should be given in
person.
When a public address system must be used, the evacuation notice must be carefully phrased
to minimize alarm.
Fire alarms should only be used as an evacuation warning when there is no other way to
achieve a swift evacuation.
If time allows, and if available, some with proper expertise may be able to shut down non-
essential equipment.
As personnel evacuate, they should be instructed to take their personal belongings, provided
they can do so quickly.
Evacuated personnel are to gather at pre-designated assembly area and not congregate and
hinder emergency personnel or emergency vehicle access.
Some situations will require immediate evacuation, e.g., earthquake, fire, hazardous materials release,
while other events or the likelihood or anticipation of, e.g., bomb threat, severe weather, volcanic ash,
may also necessitate an evacuation but may allow more time to vacate the premises. These two
conditions merit different approaches.
Table 7.22:Average Number of Labour, Supervisors Within Port/Shift Sl.No Berth Details Mechanical Manual Number of labour employed per shift
1 Iron Ore Berth (IOB) Mechanised 65
2 Coal Berth –I (CHB) Mechanised
3 Quay. I (EQ-1) General 20
4 C.Yard.-I General 20
5 Multipurpose Berth(MPB) General 20
6 DSTB Trawlers 50
Total 175
Visitors 50
Grand Total 225
Table 7.23:Movements Through Gates
GATE 1 GATE 2
Entry for Labour
Trucks -export cargo Trucks export cargo
Office and Guest Cars
Table 7.24: Location of Canteens In Harbour area Berth
Opposite Admin Building -
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 331
Table 7.25:Evacuation Action-Coordination and Specific Follow Up
DEPT & ACTION BY SPECIFIC ACTION
Administration -Secretary 1-Overall Supervision of Evacuation at township & Reports to Chairman
Traffic controller 2-Evacuation of work force at harbour area.
Administration - PRO 3-Announcement of Evacuation through PA on mobile units
Administration -Dy Secy & Estate Officer
4-Arrange Relief Centres ready to accommodate evacuated persons
Administration-Dy.Secy(G) 5-Procure Transport vehicles to transport persons at relief centres
Civil Eng - Addl CE 6-Provide adequate Drinking water at temporary evacuation shelters
Medical - Dy CMO 7-Provide Medicine and First Aid at Assembly points & relief centres
E&M Dept. EE(PED-1) 8-Provide adequate lighting at temporary evacuation shelters
Administration- PRO 9-Provide food at temporary evacuation shelters
Commandant 10-Confirmation that evacuation operations are complete
Administration-Secretary 11-Status Report to Chairman/Dy Chairman every hour
Table 7.26:Evacuation Routes
INCIDENT EVACUATION ROUTES (APPENDIX PORT LAYOUT)
1 Natural Calamities
Assemble near the main Fire station to proceed to the relief centres or to other constructed shelters
2 Toxic Gas Release
The route decision will be determined depending upon the wind direction at the time of the incident. It will be in the upwind direction of the outflow source direction.
3 Fire At Oil Berth Assemble at the fire station to proceed out as directed
4 Fire At Gen. Cargo Berth
Assemble at Gate No 1 or Gate No 2
Table 7.27:Relief Centres
S No Name of Institution Area
1 Pranavi College of Arts and Science Naupada
2 Government High School, Tekkali Vemulada
3 MPUP School, Tekkali Rotari Nagar
4. All cyclone shelters To be established near Naupada railway junction and
Bhavanapadu village
Table 7.28:Food Packets Suppliers
S.NO NAME OF THE AGENCY/HOTELS Area
1 Odiya Hotel Saravapeta
2 NRL Dhaba Srikakulum
3 Jagabandhu Odia Family Dhaba Saravapeta
4 Sudarshana Lodge Ayodhapuram
5 Bihar Bangla Dhaba Tekkali
6 Jagabandhu Dhaba Tharlipeta
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 332
TRANSPORTATION-VEHICLE POOL
As soon as this Action Plan comes into force, the vehicle pool stands formed. The vehicles will be hired
from the following transport pool: Apart from the above E&M Dept. shall hire vehicles from the private
vehicles contractors for emergency work. The list of private vehicle contractors is given below:
Table 7.29:List of private vehicle contractors Sl. No. Name of the Institution to whom vehicles belong Area
1 KVR Travels Rotari Nagar, Tekkali
2 Anandh Travels Borigipeta
3 Travel Tales Jiyyannapeta
4 Pavitra Travels Allu Yogeswararao Santhabommali
All vehicles whether it is of Port or hired should be parked in the location from where it can be taken for
immediate use as soon as the people move into action.
CONTACT WITH RAILWAYS
Deputy Secretary (G) to ensures for the smooth movement of workers/employees for which he may get
in touch with the Station Master Bhavanapadu and apprise him about the situation so that the
movement of staff moves efficiently.
MEDICAL AND FIRST AID
Medical Department personnel respond to the emergency after getting the call. These procedures are
developed to assist them in responding the emergencies in effective manner and deal with preparations
of organizing the medical team after getting the call. Objective of these procedures is to assist
responding team in giving efficient treatment and speedy referrals if necessary.
PROCEDURE:
Record the emergency calls properly and allocates resources.
Ensure availability of life support equipment’s.
Continuously interact through telephone with POC Control Room and Fire Station.
Understand emergency situation from site personnel and Site Incident Controller (SIC).
Decide strategies to respond the emergency in coordination with SIC and get appropriate
assistance.
Receive and provide treatment to casualties.
Arrange additional resources with coordination from Site Incident Controller.
OIL SPILL CONTINGENCY PLAN
This plan delineates the response to the emergency actions to be taken during oil spillage. The major
objectives of this plan are:
Early detection and effective communication system for reporting about oil spill/discharge.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 333
Accurate collection, situation analysis and dissemination of information related to oil
spill/discharge.
Outlining of a response system, which is both effective and categorised, to counteract the oil
spill/discharge and also ensures safeguard of public health as well as welfare.
Delineation of format for records which is indispensable for successful implementation and
review of this plan.
OIL SPILL RESPONSE ORGANIZATION
The Oil Spill Contingency Plan shall have the organisational structure as shown below. This organization
structure is delineated as per the Guidelines and Inspection Handbook for Pollution Response Facilities
of Ports and Oil Handling Agencies by the Indian Coast Guard (CGBR No. 774).
Figure 7.2 Oil Spill Contingency Organisation
The following Teams shall comprise of the Oil Spill Contingency Response Organisation.
MANAGEMENT TEAM
The management team should have overall responsibility of the spill response operation. Its main
functions relate to:
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 334
Overall execution of the plan.
Determining strategies for priority areas and the various polluted sites.
Reviewing operations.
Gathering and collating information.
Authorising media releases.
Controlling general financial aspects of the operation.
Interacting with other agencies involved in the clean-up operation, GoI agencies, the media and
public.
Preparing formal detailed management and situation reports.
Deciding when to terminate operations.
TECHNICAL TEAM
The technical team should be responsible for the management of all operations at the site of the
incident. On the basis of the oil pollution risk assessment, the technical team working in close
cooperation with the environmental team, should assess the situation, plan and implement the
response operation. The basic function of technical team is as under:
Collecting and evaluating incident information.
Identifying high risk areas.
Determining the best response strategy at each of the various polluted sites.
Monitoring the progress of the operation.
Preparing daily incident logs of operations.
Allocating resources on a priority basis.
Allocating outside contractors to specific sites and tasks.
Implementing the chosen strategy.
Directing the clean-up operations.
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT TEAM
The environmental management team should have extensive, detailed local knowledge of shoreline
habitats and species likely to be affected by clean-up operations. All clean-up operations shall be based
on the zero left over concept for termination of clean-up operation with the all available latest
technologies. The team should be able to provide advice on human health, ecological and amenity
interests. Working in close co-operation with the technical team, this team should fulfil several basic
functions, including provision of advice on:
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 335
Risk and vulnerability of environmental features due to oil pollution.
Possible/probable impacts of the oil.
Priority for protection of sensitive sites.
Effect of clean-up methods on the local environment.
Potential and real effects on human health.
Help to implement the chosen strategies.
Monitoring and ensuring that priorities of clean-up techniques adequately reflect
environmental concerns.
Coordinating all environmental monitoring and sampling programmes.
Providing liaison links with other interested environmental organisations.
FINANCIAL TEAM
The financial team should be responsible for establishing an effective and efficient financial accounting
system and outlining procedures for preparing and submitting compensation claims in advance of an oil
spill incident. It should establish a detailed financial accounting system for effective and efficient
management of the financial aspects of an oil spill incident. The procedures need to be implemented in
advance, wherein all expenditure incurred during an incident can be logged and tracked. Once these
have been determined, all teams must be informed of the correct procedures to be followed in every
transaction that they carry out. It may be accepted that local authorities are responsible for shoreline
clean-up, but economic assistance may not be offered by GoI. Therefore, local authorities should
prepare a budget for the possibility of a major oil spill incident occurring within their area. A
Memorandum of Understanding could be drawn up, taking account of the prospects of the successful
recovery of costs and defining how much expenditure will be allowed and on what services. However, it
is impossible to accurately estimate the level of expenditure that may be incurred during an incident and
it is likely that the constraints of having an approved emergency budget may still have to be lifted
temporarily. Therefore, the financial arrangements cannot be too rigid. The local authorities should,
however, have some means of control over the discretion of those responsible for acquiring necessary
equipment, personnel, etc. to avoid the creation of further unnecessary financial problems.
LOGISTICS TEAM
The logistics team should be responsible for organizing, providing, marshalling and routing essential
personnel, vehicles, equipment, facilities, services and supplies to meet all the requirements of the
teams involved in the incident management. In order to determine the short and long term needs of the
incident, the team should take into account the fact that the incident may last only for few days or, on
the other hand might prolong up to several weeks or months.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 336
PRESS AND PERSONAL RELATIONS TEAM
In every oil spill incident, media management is one important activity to develop confidence among all
sections of the society and also among the affected parties.
Table 7.30: Oil Spill Response Equipment List S.No. Response Equipment Units Capacity/Dimension
1 Canadyne Fence Boom on reel with power pack M 225
2 Lamour brush skimmer system (12 m3/ h) Sets 2
3 Floating storage tank (25 m3) Nos 2
4 Lamour side collector (123 m3/h) Sets 2
OIL SPILL RESPONSE EQUIPMENT
The oil spill response equipment list is given in Table 7.30. This list shall be finalised after discussion with
Indian Coast Guard officials. The Port control room shall have the following equipment:
Tidal stream gauge: Rate of flow and direction of current.
Tide gauge: Tide height.
Wind gauge: Wind speed and direction.
VHF set with complete range of marine frequencies: Communication
TRAINING, INSPECTION AND DRILL SCHEDULE
The training, inspection and drill schedule for the management team and workers is given in Table 7.31.
Table 7.31: Training, Inspection and Drill Schedule
Training Duration Frequency Participant Remark
IMO Model course 2-5 days Once Key persons By maritime training institute
Oil spill 1-5 days Once every 5 years
Key persons Coast guard
Oil spill equipment 1-5 days Once every year
Team Managers In house
Internal checking 1-2 hours 6 Month Operational staff
Checking of systems and communications
Mock drill 6-8 hours Once in a year All In house
The list of telephone numbers and contact addresses required in the time of emergency need to be
prepared in the suggested format presented in Table 7.32
Table 7.32: Format for preparation of Telephone directory
Sl.No. Name /Designation Address Phone No.
MUTUAL AID SCHEME
Industrialization is growing rapidly in Andhra Pradesh with increasing number of large and medium scale
industries coming up. In spite of the latest process technology adopted and various safety measures
taken up by the units, there is a possibility of a mishap occurring. If such an eventuality arise, a large
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 337
number of resources will be required in the shortest possible time, fire tenders, fire extinguishing media,
breathing apparatus, personal protective equipment’s etc in order to counter such a mishap. It is not
practicable to maintain such huge inventory by a single unit to meet any eventuality, as the potential
scenarios will vary in magnitude and frequency. So it will be immensely beneficial if the nearby
industries to enter into a Mutual Aid Scheme.
COLLISIONS
Collisions in which the cargo tanks are ruptured are generally accompanied by heavy sparking and
ignition of the leaking gases following the tank rupture. Fire generates heat and it may damage adjoining
tanks. External cooling is unlikely to prevent and best option is to evacuate ship and tow the vessel away
to open sea, safe distance from port.
Table 7.33: Collision: Port Flotilla And Vessels Calling At Bhavanapadu Port
SHIPBOARD-PORT EMERGENCY PLAN COLLISION
Action to be taken Action By Port Action By Vessel
1.Slow down and stop main engines 2.Sound Emergency Alarm: 3.Check for possibility of oil pollution
Master
1-Establish communication with other vessel and exchange information 2-Advise other vessels to keep clear-Hoist NUC Lights 3-Advise port for assistance 4-Advises agents of status requests surveyors-Class- P&I-Salvage association- 5-Secure evidence and maintain adequate records
HM with on-site action group.
1-Inspects/assesses damaged area& in - case of oil leakage determine whether de-berthing of the vessels will increase oil spill rate. 2-Ascertains oil pollution-ascertains leak source 3-Harbourmaster and Master of vessel to inspect vessels 4-Sounds all bilge, ballast and fuel tanks 5-Transfer oil from leaking tanks 6-Effects damage control and temporary repairs to stop oil leakage if any with the assistance of port action group and underwater welding team or salvage group
HM with on-site action group Coast Guard + Salvage efforts
Vessel emergency action group team
1-Provides First Aid 1-Attend engine room controls and services 2-Investigate engine room for damages and water ingress 3-Check steering gear 4-Reports status of the main engine and auxiliaries to Harbour master
HM + Dy. CMO. HM Vessel Engineering team
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 338
Table 7.34: Fire / Explosion Checklist For Use In Emergency SHIPBOARD EMERGENCY PLAN FIRE / EXPLOSION OFF BERTH
Action to be considered Action Responsibility
IMMEDIATE ACTION Consider sounding Emergency Alarm: Initiate vessel emergency response procedure:
Yes/No Yes/No
Person discovering incident Officer on duty
INITIAL RESPONSE Cease all cargo and / or bunkering operation: Close manifold valves: Fire squads to position deemed best for fighting the fire: Inform terminal/loading master/bunkering personnel:
Yes/No Yes/No Yes/No
Yes/No
Ch. Eng. / Officer on duty Ch. Eng./ Officer on duty Chief Engineer/ Ch.Off. Master / Officer on duty/ Chief Engineer
SECONDARY RESPONSE Stop air intake into accommodation: Consider to stop non-essential air intake to engine room: Determine the extent of the damage, and decide what damage control measures can be taken: Determine whether there are casualties: Contain the fire and prevent it from spreading to other parts of the vessel: Assess health hazards from smoke: If possible, position the vessel to minimize the wind effect: Start recovering of any casualties: Notify authorities and outside organisation, as appropriate: Evaluate evacuation of non-essential crew:
Yes/No Yes/No Yes/No
Yes/No
Yes/No Yes/No Yes/No Yes/No Yes/No Yes/No
Chief Engineer Chief Engineer Master / Chief Officer Chief Officer Master/Ch.Off./Ch.Engg. Ch.Off./Deck Duty heads Master Chief Officer Master Master
FURTHER RESPONSE Assess the possibility of pollution from leakage: Fit scupper plugs if spillage on deck: Check all tanks and compartments: Alter trim if necessary: Transfer bunker internally, if required: Require assistance as deemed necessary: Comply with reporting procedures: If required, obtain permission from local authorities and/Or the terminal to continue normal operation
Yes/No Yes/No Yes/No Yes/No Yes/No Yes/No Yes/No
Yes/No
Master/Ch.Off./Ch.Eng. Duty Off. / Dk Dutyheads Chief Officer Chief Officer Chief Officer/Ch. Eng. Master Master Master
Table 7.35: Bunker Spill/Leakage Checklist for Use in Emergency
Shipboard Oil Pollution Emergency Plan Bunker Spill/Leakage
IMMEDIATE ACTION
Consider sounding Emergency Alarm:
Initiate vessel emergency response procedure:
Yes/No
SECONDARY RESPONSE
Consider to stop air intake into accommodation/engine room:
Reduce the tank level by dropping bunker into an empty or slack tank:
Assess fire risk from release of flammable substances, or health hazards from toxic
substances:
Prepare pumps for transfer of bunkers to shore/barge, if necessary:
Prepare spillage overboard, if necessary, by adjusting ship trim:
Contain spill with seals or absorbent materials:
Prepare portable pumps where it is possible to transfer spill into an empty or slack tank:
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 339
Shipboard Oil Pollution Emergency Plan Bunker Spill/Leakage
Check scupper plugs for tightness:
Man fire station on deck if necessary:
Consider notification of authorities:
FURTHER RESPONSE
Clean-up as required by using material from provided contingency unit:
Transfer deck washing into slop tank:
Ensure that residues collected in the clean-up operation are stored carefully prior to
disposal:
Comply with reporting procedures:
If required, obtain permission from local authorities and/ or the terminal to continue
normal operation:
Table 7.36: Vessel Grounding In Port- Detailed Action by Port
Action By Marine Dept Details Of Specific Action
1-Master/Pilot Contacts Signal Station on VHF Ch 16 or Ch 14 and informs position of incident
2-Signal Station Informs HM, Dy Conservator and Coast Guard All vessels arriving and departing Bhavanapadu will be informed of the incident
3-Dy Conservator Informs coast guard for rescue of the grounded vessel.
2-Harbour Master Activates the on-site action group and assesses the situation, tide, wind direction, & inform DC. Through the Signal Station Advises all Pilots to report on duty
3- Sr. Pilot/BM/CO(flotilla)
Organises available tugs, launches, and keeps crew stand by and awaits instructions of the HM/Dy Conservator
4-Sr Hydro graphic Surveyor Proceeds by survey launch to vessel and obtains soundings around the vessel by the echo sounder and the hand lead.
6-Master of grounded vessel Records soundings of all tanks and also records draft, arrange soundings by hand lead around the vessel. Examines the soundings and draft around the vessel for transfer of bunkers, ballast or shift cargo to refloat vessel. Tow ropes to be kept ready
7-Master and Harbour Master Commence preparations for towing operations 2 hours before high tide. Vessel engines to be kept stand by to assist in the refloating operations. Takes all anti oil pollution measures.
8-Port , Navy or Coast guard & Salvage efforts
Hull leakages to be attended to by underwater welding by the Navy/coast guard or other available diving firms.
Table 7.37: Sinking Of Vessel In Port
Action By Port Marine Dept
Details Of Specific Action Action By Vessel
HM Ensures vessel is cleared of the channel / turning basin or berths to suitable area for normal traffic.
Activates the vessel action group
Signal Station Informs HM, Dy Conservator of the accident.
HM and Pilots Proceeds to the area with Tugs and conducts Rescue operations. Lower life boats
Dy Conservator Appraise to the Chairman and Dy Chairman and members of the Central Disaster Management group about the incident.
HM / Navy / Coast Guard
HM to initiates the rescue operation of the person on board.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 340
NATURAL CALAMITIES
7.2.33.1 ON SITE / INHOUSE EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS FOR NATURAL CALAMITIES
A) INCIDENT RESPONSE TEAM
An incident management team shall be constituted at the project site. This team should have the
following personnel:
i) Head of Port operations,
ii) Control room officer,
iii) Health and Safety officer
iv) Environment Management Cell
v) Department Heads,
vi) Security Officers
This team should have the details of people on duty and their locations on daily basis. The
evacuation plan should be available with the team. This team should have control on the emergency
alarm. One staff should be designated to inspect the preparedness on a daily basis.
Figure 7.3: Response Team Chart
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 341
B) EMERGENCY ALARM
An emergency alarm /siren should be in place at the site area. The details of agencies competent
enough for issuing warning or alert pertaining to various types of disasters are given below. In case of
emergency when warning is given, the alarm at the site can be instantly activated and the vigilant
team including the emergency response team can immediately start the evacuation and rescue
operation. All the workers also should be advised to vacate and move to the designated safe places.
C) EMERGENCY RESCUE KIT
Minimum rescue resources should be kept in readiness. The following emergency rescue kit to be kept
at the site.
Lifesaving jackets
100 and 200 ft. ropes
Flashlights
Extra batteries
Battery operated radio
First aid kit etc.
D) ASSEMBLY POINT
Evacuation of people from risk areas is the priority when early warning is received, or the natural
warning sign indicates the immediate arrival of cyclone, Tsunami wave or rise of storm surge.
Evacuation plan describes the time span available before and during the Tsunami or storm surge
event. When facing local threat, evacuation procedures most possibly will have the character of a
'runaway effort' and people should not expect to receive much institutional support. The primary
objective should be bringing as many people as possible out of the reach of impact to safe or
'relatively safe' areas. Therefore, necessary steps have to be taken in advance to enable and
support the community at risk to protect themselves at any time.
Assembly points close to the open space of each building should be identified and marked with
appropriate sign boards which should be known to all employees. A mock drill should be carried out
every six months so that it acts as training as well as alertness to the employees.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 342
E) COORDINATION WITH GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES
After the 2004 Tsunami affected the Indian sub-continent, the following organizations are involved on
watch and cautioning the government and public in the event of possibility of occurrence of Tsunami.
As a part of Tsunami hazard mitigation, warning systems have been established in India by the
coordination of the following organizations.
National Disaster Management Authority (NDMA), New Delhi.
Indian National Centre for Ocean Information Services (INCOIS), Hyderabad.
Indian Meteorological Department (IMD), New Delhi.
Srikakulum District Collectorate
Table 7.38: Contact Details of International and National Agencies
Organization Address Email ID Contact Number
NDMA NDMA Bhavan, A-1 Safdarjang Enclave, New Delhi -110029.
[email protected] +91- 11-26701700
INCOIS
Ocean Valley, Pragathi Nagar (BO), Nizampet (SO), Hyderabad – 500090.
[email protected] 40-23895002
IMD
Cyclone Warning Centre China Waltair Visakhapatnam - 530017
[email protected] [email protected]
0891-2543033
District Collector,
National Informatic Centre, District Collectorate, Srikakulum
[email protected]/ [email protected]
08942-222565/ 08942-222648
Cyclone
The Cyclone Contingency Plan will come into force as soon as the storm warning signal No.5 or higher is
hoisted or when the Port organization has gathered enough data to forecast that a cyclone threat is
close.
The Cyclone station will come into operation at the Signal Station.
The Harbour Master will be in charge of the Cyclone Station.
Storm warning signals will be hoisted at the Cyclone Station.
HM will inform the Chairman, Dy Chairman and heads of Depts by telephone/Mobile the status
of worsening weather conditions and storm signals.
A cyclone coordination centre will be made functional in the Administrative Building headed by
Secretary.
The Cyclone Coordination Centre will be in constant touch with Signal Station and District, Local
Administration for rescue and relief operation.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 343
All other departments to operate their respective control rooms. Signal Station, cyclone co-
ordination centre and control rooms will function round the clock and will be closed only after
obtaining the necessary orders from the Chairman.
A. Marine Department
I. Harbour Master
Under the overall supervision and responsibility of the HM, the specific duties of marine personnel will
be as below:
He will be responsible for the operation of the Signal Station and will issue necessary standing
orders for the purpose.
He will keep close liaison with Radar Station, Police Wireless Station, Coast Guard and Ships in
Port regarding weather conditions.
He will prepare special signals and promulgate them to the Masters of the vessels, dredgers,
tugs and any other crafts in Port. He will inform the Masters of all vessels at the berths to
double the moorings, put out insurance wires and to keep engine ready to proceed out to sea if
situation warrants. Decision regarding sending ships to the anchorage will be taken depending
on the strength of the wind likely to be encountered and number of vessels in the Port.
He will maintain a close liaison and co-ordination with the Tug Engineer for arranging staffs for
manning the Port Crafts.
II. Signal Station
The staff of signal station will remain on duty until they are relieved by next shift staff or till
alternative arrangements are made or till the storm has passed or as per the HM instruction.
Every two hour barometer reading will be recorded after cyclone warning signal No.3 is hoisted
but the same will be made hourly if further upward signal is placed.
One Aldis lamp with battery will be kept ready at signal station.
The signal station will maintain a continuous watch on channel 16. Signal station will keep
Harbour Master informed of all the messages received by telephone, VHF sets or by messenger.
Signal station will inform the Harbour Master of any buoys or crafts are seen adrift or any Port
installation is seen or informed to be in danger.
The staff on duty will have sufficient provisions to stay on duty for a period ranging from
24hours to 48 hours.
Signal station receiving any weather related facsimile report will pass on to the HM.
Continuous watch to be kept on CWDC. On receipt of any warning, the same shall be reported
immediately to the cyclone co-ordination centre.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 344
Signal Station will be responsible to ensure that Weather messages are intimated to the
Executive Engineer, in charge of Fishery Harbour on Channel 6 over VHF.
III. Tidal Observatory
The Assistant Hydrographic Surveyor / Hydrographic Surveyor will record the range of tides, times and
heights of high and low water who will in turn apprise the Dy Conservator / HM and or Sr. pilot on duty
of the actual and predicted tides.
IV. Sr Hydrographic Surveyor/Hydrographic Surveyor/Pilot
The above officers will assist the HM at the Cyclone Station. One Pilot has to be kept standby to
proceed on board anywhere in the Port as required.
V. Berthing Master/Chief Officer (Flotilla)
Berthing Master/Chief Officer (Flotilla) will detail one shore gang consisting of minimum one
Serang, one Tindal and 10 laskars to remain on duty as emergency duty squad unit being
relieved by the next shift staff or until Harbour Master instruction.
Berthing Master/Chief Officer (Flotilla) will take all necessary steps for the safety of the Port
crafts and should ensure that all other crafts are placed at safe place and properly secured
excepting one pilot launch and one stand by launch used for inspection and emergency duties.
He along with emergency squad will make frequent round (minimum two hourly) to check the
safety of Port Crafts.
Fender and extra lengths of ropes/wires will be kept ready so as to attend to any craft whose
moorings may part.
Berthing Master/Chief Officer (Flotilla) will inform the cyclone station immediately in the event
any craft is seen adrift or any other Port installation is seen in danger
He will also keep a listening watch on his walkie talkie set for information.
VI. Master of Tug/Pilot Launches And Other Launches
Masters of respective crafts will instruct their staff to remain on board until they are relieved by
next shift staff or Sr Duty Pilot releases them from duty.
Masters will shift their respective crafts at suitable places as directed by the Harbour Master
and will secure them suitably with additional moorings. Masters of respective crafts will be
responsible for proper securing and safety.
Masters will keep the engines of their crafts ready to proceed at short notice as per the
instructions of the Chief Officer.
Extra fenders will be kept ready on board of the Tug for use as required.
If any craft is seen adrift or any other port installation is seen in danger, the Master of the crafts
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 345
will immediately inform the cyclone station.
VII. Electrical And Mechanical Engineering Department
Table 7.39: Field Units Composition Division Positions Nos Division Positions No
IOHP DIVN EE (MAINT.) 1 TUG ENGR DIVN TUG ENGINEER 1
AE(MECH) 3 EIC’s 2
AE(ELECT) 1
WORKSHOP DIVISION / LOCOSHED EE (WSD) 1
AE(M) 3 C.H.DIVN EE ,C.H.D. 1
A.E(M) 3
P.E. DIVN EE. PED 1
A.E(E) 3 M.E. DIVN M.E 1
AE 2
The cyclone mitigation team shall be headed by Addl C.E. & M.E. with Mech Supdt., SE (Electrical),
SE(IOHP), SE (Workshop) / EE(Workshop) and EE(P&D) as his assistants in the control room.
The Departmental vehicles as well as the hired taxis of the department shall be deployed for the
above purpose.
PRECAUTIONARY MEASURES
Cyclone warning signals shall be communicated to all field units from the control room.
The field units shall communicate the signal to all the staff of the Divisions.
General Functions of Field Units
All the equipment shall be properly secured.
Safety of workmen on duty shall be given priority during work
Operator’s cabin doors of all the equipment and vehicles shall be kept shut.
Important documents/files/records at site must be stored well above the floor.
Specific Duty
Wagon tippler/ RSS
Electrical Control Panel of the wagon tippler/ RRS to be properly shut off.
Wagons to be taken out of the tippler table / RRS table and no empty wagons should be kept in
the inner line.
Power breaker to be made off
All Conveyors, Stackers, Stacker-Cum-Reclaimers, Reclaimers
Machine to be travelled to designated position
Tie down the belts, locking of travel wheel, locking of boom conveyor
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 346
Slewing locking bolts to be fitted.
Rail clamps to be tightened
Booms are to be properly clamped.
Power to be shut off - outgoing feeder from substation to be switched off
Control room of the machine should be properly locked
All conveyors should be tied down at the head end and tail end.
Main Control Room:
Power should be shut-off, breaker should be made-off and doors should be closed.
Ship Loader:
Conveyors to be cleared of all cargo.
Belt to be tied down at the tip on both sides of the ship loader.
Blocking of travel wheels after latching of the booms.
Diesel generating set should be tried and kept ready for supplying power wherever necessary.
Anchoring of the Ship loader at its parking position.
Rail clamp to be tightened
Site Store
All the doors and windows should be locked up and power should be made off.
All the equipment’s like cranes, etc. in working condition should be sent to Marine/Central
Workshop for safe.
Welding generator should be kept inside the store and locked up.
Communication system should be tested for operation.
Battery charging point should be operated through a DG Set.
A vehicle should be available at the control room.
Executive Engineer IOHP will have a temporary advance if required for contingency
expenditure.
Port Electrical Division
On receipt of directive from the EE(PED-1) , the power supply of main sub-station to be made
off and communication system from control room to the sub-station to be kept operative
Walkie-talky handsets must be made available in all the substation for establishing
communication
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 347
Two emergency vehicles should be kept stand-by for attending to various duties.
EE (PED-1) will have a temporary advance if required to meet the contingency expenditure.
Marine Engineering Division
Engine room entrance doors, sky lights etc. of all the floating crafts to be kept shut.
All the heavy earth moving equipment and vehicles must be stored in sheltered locations and
operator’s cabin must be kept shut.
Special care shall be given for securing the crane boom.
Marine Engineer will have a temporary advance if required to meet contingency expenditure.
Crafts are to be manned as per Marine Engineer.
Tug Engineering Division
EICs (Engineers in Charge) of all tugs on receiving the cyclone warning must ensure that tugs are
in readiness for operation.
Tugs will be operated as per the Marine Department’s requirement.
Loco Shed
Loco engines to be parked inside the shed
The point to the shed line to be blocked.
All derailing equipment, batteries and tools shall be kept ready for emergency use.
Two groups of wagon staff to be kept as standby.
The cross and long travel of the EOT crane to be blocked and hook to be anchored.
Engineering Services- Central Workshop
The centre Workshop shall be manned by one group of staff consisting of one Machinist, one
Fitter, one Welder and three Helpers to attend to emergency requirement.
Power supply to all the machineries and equipment to be shut off.
Doors and windows of the Central Workshop to be kept shut.
B. Cargo Handling Division
The Executive Engineer, Cargo Handling Division will supervise and ensure the following:
All the mobile cranes to be brought to a safe place, booms of the cranes to be lowered and
clamped. Cabin doors and panels to be closed.
All wharf cranes are properly anchored on the rail, slewing are blocked and booms are placed at
the highest position and retained by two turn buckles. Booms are in the direction of the track,
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 348
so that more distance is kept between the ship at the berth and the cabin of the wharf crane.
Forklifts and all heavy earth moving equipment are parked inside the shed.
Three crane operators and six helpers should be on duty during the cyclone period.
The Executive Engineer (CHD) will have a temporary advance if required to meet the
contingency expenditure.
C. Civil Engineering Department
I. Public Health Division
Executive Engineer, Public Health Division will ensure the following:
The staff as per usual shifts is deployed at each of pump house during cyclone.
A sufficient quantity of bleaching powder, alum etc. and the water treatment plant is kept ready
for water treatment during cyclone period.
As soon as the contingency plan is made operational all the water tanks should be filled up and
standby arrangement for supply of water to be made with special provision for the hospital.
II. Harbour Works Division
The following actions will be taken:
The Executive Engineer HWD No 1 will post one Asst. Engineer exclusively to look after
navigational aids, fenders; transit shed doors and roofs etc. along with necessary staff.
The Executive Engineer HWD no II will deploy one Asst. Engineer along with necessary staff to
look after the sea wall condition & if any breach is noticed along the side of the sea-wall,
immediate steps should be taken up for its repair.
For the above purpose he shall keep ready 3,000 to 4,000 empty cements bags to be used.
All measures to be taken to minimise uprooting of trees.
III. Fishing Harbour Division
The EE (Fishery harbour Division) should take adequate steps to protect the infrastructure of
Fishing Harbour before the cyclonic weather.
VHF Communication will be maintained with the Cyclone Station on Channel 6.
D. Traffic Department
IV. Operation
Deputy Traffic Manager (Operations) will take the following measures:
All loading/unloading of cargo operations to be ceased.
All the cargoes under Port’s custody, lying outside and likely to get damaged, will be shifted to
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 349
Transit Sheds/Ware Houses.
Doors of the sheds will be closed and properly secured.
He will visit the site and inspect the arrangements.
V. Railways
Deputy Traffic Manager (Railways) will ensure the following
Yard Master personally takes over the charge of yard supervision instead of leaving the same to
shift staff.
Movement of wagons is stopped when wind speed exceeds the operational limit (70 KM per
hour).
All the rolling stock on tracks is clamped / chained both in Port area and exchange yard and the
locomotives are returned to the Loco Shed.
E. Administration Department
The Secretary will remain overall in-charge of the Cyclone Coordination Centre.
The Secretary shall make a duty roster for the manning of the cyclone coordination centre by
the officers of Administrative, Finance & Accounts and Materials Management Department.
The Co-ordination Centre will keep constant touch with the Local & District Administration for
rendering necessary assistance.
The port Public Relations Officer will ensure announcement by the mike in the township
indicating the precautionary measures to be taken.
The DS (P&IR) will make necessary arrangement in coordination with the local administration
for evacuating people from the low lying area. They will be shifted to relief centres as indicated
below
F. FINANCE & ACCOUNTS DEPARTMENT
The DDOs may utilize the Pre-paid Card loaded with required amount during cyclone. In case
of difficulty in withdrawing cash at the bank level, cash shall be kept reserved in F&A
Department.
The entire department may inform the FA&CAO Office the amount of cash required by them so
that the same can be kept in advance and can be disbursed by one of the Officers of the Finance
& Accounts Department as per need.
G. G-MEDICAL DEPARTMENT
The casualty ward is to be manned by one Specialist in addition to the regular Doctors
attending.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 350
The Ambulance has to be kept standby near the casualty ward.
H. MATERIAL MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT
The Manager (Materials) will ensure the following:
During cyclonic season sufficient stock of stores like Polythene, Hooks, screw hinges, gunny
bags, tarpaulins, ropes and wires for Port Crafts, diesel oil, kerosene oil, petromax lamps, torch
lights with batteries and bulbs, electrical items etc. are kept.
All the materials which are likely to get damaged with rain are covered with tarpaulin.
One Stores Supdt., one Store Keeper and the other minimum staff required to issue materials
including POL are kept during emergency.
I. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
Assistant Secretaries/Office Superintendents/Head Assistant/ Divisional Accountants will ensure
that the doors and windows are properly closed prior to leaving the office
All important files are stored in secure cupboards
J. POST CYCLONE DUTIES
All the Heads of the Departments are required to assess the damage and submit a detailed
report indicating the estimate to the Chairman. For this, a team may be formed comprising
Sr.Pilot, Dy Traffic Manager, EE (Elect) EE (Mech) EE (Civil) and assisted by one representative
from the Finance Department. The preliminary report is to be submitted within 48 hours and
detailed report within four days from the date of normalcy.
Hydro graphic survey is to be conducted to assess the channel condition and ensure resumption
of shipping as early as possible.
In case of any small craft sunk or grounded the same to be removed to make the channel/berth
safe for navigation. HM will detail a salvage party headed by the Berthing Master/Chief Officer
Flotilla for this purpose.
A team of Officers to be nominated by the Administrative Department to supervise the rescue
and relief operation and disposal of animal carcasses in coordination with the local and District
Administration.
Preventive measures for epidemics to be taken by the Medical Department.
All the operating systems to be attended urgently and made operational as early as possible on
a war footing basis to resume operation.
Spot tendering procedure shall be followed for repairs up to Rs.2 lakhs by the
Concerned Executive Engineers.
Water supply and electricity to be given priority. The electrical cabling network to be checked
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 351
area-wise. The inspection team to be decided by the Addl. CE&ME for obtaining clearance to
resume power supply.
All damaged temporary roofed houses in the port premises will be attended to.
The Manager Materials will nominate a team for the procurement and supply of essential
materials for repair of various structures and equipment as reported.
To assess the progress of repair works, Heads of Depts meeting will be held daily till normalcy is
restored.
Assistant Secretary /Head Assistant may prepare a list of files if damaged and report to the
Heads of Depts.
COASTAL FLOODING
Coastal flooding occurs when high tides, combine with low barometric pressure, and high winds. It is the
possibility of coastal flooding that poses the greatest risk.
Flood waters may create an emergency situation, consider:
The water may be contaminated by oil, gasoline, raw sewage or other hazardous material.
Water may be electrically charged from underground (e.g. container crane rails) or downed
power lines.
Six inches of moving water can make walking extremely dangerous.
Submerged obstacles, roadway shoulders, holes or soft ground may be undetectable.
The ground may have weakened and could collapse under the weight of a vehicle.
Vehicles can be swept away by floodwaters.
The Metrological department issues flood warnings:
Coastal Flood Watch means that flooding is possible.
Coastal Flood Warning indicates that flooding is already occurring or will occur soon
When a Coastal Flood Watch is issued:
Relocate records, equipment, high value or critical items
If time permits, certain flood proofing mitigation measures may be taken such as constructing
levees, sandbagging, and installing pumps.
When a Coastal Flood Warning is issued:
Be prepared to evacuate.
Shut down flammable liquids and gas systems.
If instructed, turn off utilities at main switches or valves
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 352
Move toward higher ground.
Do not walk through moving water.
If you must walk in a flooded area, walk where it is not moving and use a stick or similar object
to check the firms of the ground in front of you.
Stay away from downed power lines.
Table 7.40: Action Plan Floods-Similar To Cyclone
DEPT ACTION
MARINE Signal Station passes weather message to HM and DC
HM places on-site action group alert DC apprises Chairman of weather developments who
places Central Disaster Management Group on alert if necessary.
Civil Engg Drainage system of the port i.e. inside harbour area & outside harbour area should make
cleared.
Trailer mounted portable Diesel pump sets to be made standby with sufficient length of
hose pipes.
Sand bags to be used around sensitive areas including water supply Pump stations electric
sub stations
Elec & Mach
Egg
All the outside installations and equipment shall be properly secured.
Cyclone field units to be made alert
Administration To make standby arrangements for transportation to evacuate population in low lying
areas to cyclone centres and relief centres & arrange food and water.
EARTHQUAKE
It is fundamental to effective earthquake preparedness that everything that can be practically done to
minimize the likely effects of an earthquake be accomplished before an earthquake occurs. This includes
building and facilities construction, storage planning and practices, and education of PORT personnel of
appropriate actions when an earthquake occurs. This document deals with policies and procedures
following an earthquake. Not all earthquakes are of the same magnitude. Further, the effects of an
earthquake (including structure damage) may vary significantly from one area to another. This may be
due to differences in distance from the earthquake's epicentre, differences in geology, differences in
topography, or differences in building construction. For these reasons, at the occasion of an earthquake,
it will be incumbent on responsible parties at each site to determine the level of response, which is
appropriate for their site. For our Initial Assessment purposes earthquakes will be categorized at three
levels:
Level I A slight tremor is felt. Window shades swing and perhaps some small objects fall from desks, etc. It
appears unlikely that there is significant damage
Level
II
The shaking is quite noticeable. Pictures are askew and things topple from desks and bookshelves. Some
windows may crack. Damage, though noticeable, appears to be minor in nature
Level This is the "big one." It may be difficult to walk. Items fall and some bookcases, etc. topple. Power lines
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 353
III sway violently. There is structural damage to buildings
Most earthquakes will fall in the Level I category. In the event of a Level I quake stay calm and
communicate with those around you. The facility manager or supervisor should advise the Port Deputy
Conservator of the event and the initial assessment. Please keep in mind, however, that this could be
the precursor of a larger quake. The likelihood of this is not great but the possibility should not be
dismissed. This would be a good time to search your work area for heavy or dangerous objects that
could cause injury should they fall in a greater tremor.
A Level II earthquake calls for action. Even though there may appear to be little or no damage there may
be problems about which you may not be immediately aware (such as broken gas lines, damaged wiring,
structural damage, etc.). Therefore, a Level II earthquake calls for an orderly evacuation of the building
until inspections indicate it is safe to re-enter. In this case the senior responsible person (one who would
be the Site Incident Commander in the event of a Level III earthquake) should conduct an inspection of
the building and its systems to confirm a safe environment.
Once successfully completed, employees will be advised to return to work. As with Level I tremors, this
could be the precursor of a larger quake and this would be a good time to search your work area for
heavy or dangerous objects that could cause injury should they become unstable in a greater tremor.
The following procedures are provided as a guideline to PORT personnel in attendance at the occasion
of a Level III earthquake. This will be a seismic event in which the shaking is substantial and damage is
likely, if not apparent. Response organization is divided in a chronological priority with activities
prioritized secondarily.
Action Plan for Earthquake
Figure 7.4: Action Plan for Earthquake
Table 7.41: Detail of Relief Work after Earth Quake
DEPT ACTION
Chairman To contact the District Collector, Relief Commissioner, Army, Navy, Coast guards and seek
assistance for Port Town ship.
EARTHQUAKE PREDICTIONS
Local earthquake are difficult to predict
The proposed Greenfield port location at Bhavanapadu is
considered located in Zone III as per seismic zoning map of India
Frequency of tremors as reported in the
newspapers, TV and radio
Rattling of doors and windows on high storied
building
Unusual barking of dogs and zoo animals-notably
elephants
Falling of old and weak structures
CHARACTERISTICS-QUAKE
Magnitude; Focal depth; location of quake
centre; Rupture length; Rupture orientation
PROPERTY-characteristics
Distance from focus; Soil conditions;
Geology; buildings constructed to resist
lateral forces; bend rather than break; resist
sway; are foundations in sandy soil
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 354
If you are outdoors, find a clear spot away from buildings, trees, streetlights, and power lines. Keep lying
on the ground and stay there until the shaking stops. Injuries can occur from falling trees, street-lights
and power lines, or building debris. If you are in a vehicle, pull over to a clear location, stop and stay
there with your seatbelt fastened until the shaking has stopped. Trees, power lines, poles, street signs,
and other overhead items may fall during earthquakes. Stopping will help reduce your risk. Once the
shaking has stopped, proceed with caution. Avoid bridges or ramps that might have been damaged by
the quake. Stay indoor until the shaking stops.
TSUNAMI
The phenomenon Tsunami is a series of traveling ocean waves of extremely long length generated
primarily by earthquakes occurring below or near the ocean floor. Following safety measures needs to
be learnt before, during and after the occurrence of tsunami
7.2.36.1 Characteristics
Tsunamis are a series of enormous waves created by an underwater disturbance such as an earthquake,
landslide, volcanic eruption, or meteorite. A tsunami can move about 500 miles per hour in the open
ocean. Once the wave approaches the shore, it builds in height. The topography of the coastline and the
ocean floor will influence the size of the wave. There may be more than one wave and the succeeding
one may be larger than the one before. Drowning is the most common cause of death associated with a
tsunami. Tsunami waves and the receding water are very destructive to structures
WARNING/CONFIRMATION
Meteorological Station
Coast Guards
TV and Radio News
Before
Be familiar with the tsunami warning signals. People living along the coast should consider an
earthquake or a sizable ground rumbling as a warning signal. A noticeable rapid rise or fall in
Dy Chairman To assist the Chairman to assess relief requirements
Administration Secretary – To arrange for food, shelter and transportation.
And assist the Chairman and Dy Chairman for all relief arrangements
Elect & Mach
Dept.
CE&ME –To provide and hire if necessary, earthmoving equipment’s, cranes, forklifts, bull
dozers, pneumatic hammers.
Civil Eng. Dept. CE to deploy engineers to direct or guide earth moving equipment and cranes to remove the
debris
Traffic TM to ensure safety of cargo in cargo sheds and at rail siding
Marine Dy Conservator to ensure the safety of Port Marine craft and vessels alongside
Fire To assist in Search and Rescue operation.
Medical CMO to ensure provide of proper Medical Aid to the injured
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 355
coastal waters is also a sign that a tsunami is approaching.
Make sure all employees know how to respond to a tsunami. Make evacuation plans. Pick an
inland location that is elevated.
After an earthquake or other natural disaster, roads in and out of the vicinity may be blocked,
so pick more than one evacuation route.
Teach employee how and when to turn off gas, electricity, and water
Prepare emergency kit beforehand. The emergency kit should contain Flashlight and extra
batteries, battery-operated radio and extra batteries, First aid kit Emergency food and water,
Essential medicines etc.
During
Listen to a radio or television to get the latest emergency information, and be ready to evacuate
if asked to do so.
If you hear a tsunami warning, move at once to higher ground and stay there until local
authorities say it is safe to return home.
Move in an orderly, calm and safe manner to the evacuation site.
Stay away from the beach. Never go down to the beach to watch a tsunami come in. If you can
see the wave you are too close to escape it.
Return workplace only after authorities advise it is safe to do so.
After
Stay tuned to a battery-operated radio for the latest emergency information.
Help injured or trapped persons.
Stay out of damaged buildings. Return home only when authorities say it is safe
Enter your home with caution. Use a flashlight/torch when entering damaged buildings. Check
for electrical shorts and live wires. Do not use appliances or lights until an electrician has
checked the electrical system.
Open windows and doors to help dry the building.
Shovel mud while it is still moist to give walls and floors an opportunity to dry.
Check food supplies and test drinking water.
Fresh food that has come in contact with flood waters may be contaminated and should be
thrown out.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 356
Table 7.42: Detail of Onsite Action Group
DEPT On Site Action Group
Marine HM through Signal Station informs all the ship to evacuate from the berth to open sea.
Signal Station keeps in touch with all vessels on VHF and SATCOM
C/O Flotilla to move tugs and launches to safe areas or deep water anchorages
Crew to wear life jackets
Adminstration Dy Secy (G) to arrange transport to evacuate to safer inland areas
Traffic Addl. TM ensures stoppage of all cargo operations of vessels.
Civil Engineering
Department
Addl CE to ensure sand bags is kept ready.
Elec & Mech
Department
Addl.CE&ME to ensure proper secure of the cargo handling equipment and the shore
cranes.
Table 7.43: Detail of Central Disaster Management Group
Central Disaster Management Group
Chairman Activates Central Disaster Management Group
Marine DC to apprise the group leader of the Central Disaster Management Group of any
developments and early warning Systems.
Administration Secretary to keep in constant touch with state Govt.
SECURITY THREATS
Terrorism has been defined as "The unlawful use of force or violence against persons or property to
intimidate or coerce a government; the civilian population; or any segment of it, in furtherance of
political or social objectives." Compared with other facility emergencies, the covert and criminal nature
of terrorism, including bombing incidents, bomb threats, taking of hostages, etc. is a highly complex
problem for management and emergency personnel. The PORT has no immunity to potential terrorist
activity. The potential occurrences could be the result of actions from domestic or international groups.
Terrorist actions could come about as a result of grievances, real or imagined, toward activities of some
governmental entity, federal or state, or as retaliation for some PORT action. Traditionally, small arms
and improvised explosive devises have been the weapons of choice for terrorist entities as they are easy
to acquire and use. Chances are low but growing that chemical or biological agents could be used by
some groups as such agents are cheap to produce and easy to conceal as well as being relatively lethal.
In addition, they can be expected to cause mass panic.
BOMB THREATS
Experience shows that over 95 percent of all written or telephoned threats, including bomb threats are
false. However, there is always a chance that a threat may be authentic. Appropriate action should be
taken in each case to provide for the safety of employees, the public, and property and to locate the
suspected explosive or incendiary device so it can be neutralized. The threat itself is also a crime.
Procedures
I. If the threat is received over the phone
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 357
Follow instructions on the PORT THREAT CHECKLIST.
If the threat is to the Port or its personnel notify the Deputy Conservator.
Advise that you received a threat, and relay any information from the "Check List" that they
may require.
Inform your supervisor or the facilities manager. They or Police, whoever is Incident
Commander, will decide whether or not to evacuate the building and where everyone should
assemble, if order is given to evacuate.
II. If this is a Bomb threat:
Assist the bomb squad by ensuring unobstructed access to the area.
Make sure all non-essential staff have been evacuated from the vicinity
Instruct personnel to take their briefcases, lunch boxes, purses and small packages with them.
This will decrease the number of packages to be examined by search teams.
Once the bomb squad has access to the area, proceed to a safe distance from it, individuals who
know what does or does not belong in or near the building could assist the police in their search
for a suspected bomb.
Table 7.44: Detail of Onsite Action Group for Bomb Treat Dept. Action
Security 1-Commandant reports that Bomb Threat received by staff/outsider
2-Recomends emergency classification II or III to chairman
3-Requisitions of fire tender and ambulances and positioning them at a safe distance from the
threatened or suspected area.
4-Ensures evacuation of the workmen working inside the port area, if the threat is inside the
prohibited area.
5-Requisitions of BDDS(Bomb Detection & Disposal Squad) from Cuttack
Checklists-Questions to Ask Bomb Threat Caller
Threat received in writing telephone
On phone keep caller on line as long as possible
Ask colleague to inform security to trace call-tape recorder
DECISION ELEMENTS
History of threats-local-national
Prevailing conditions of strikes,
Industrial tension, political issues
Implications/dangers of evacuation
OBJECTIVE
To avoid any loss to lives and property
To eliminate panic
To be prepared for the safe
handling/disposal of a bomb
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 358
Ask for bomb location? Time of detonation?
What type of a bomb? How does it look?
How do you know so much about bombs?
Advise caller of the loss of innocent lives as a consequence of a bomb detonation
Could he live with this guilt for the rest of his life
Whom does he represent? Why is he doing this?
Background Noises music, airport, railway factory tel. booth Residence-to trace place of call
Check voice characteristics; Male Female Voice Quality-Calm excited Anger
Age Accent-local out of state foreign disguised
Speech Impediment stammer slow educated
laughing deliberate familiar
WAR ALERT
When war like situation is developed or during the declaration of war the priority is to be given to all
important/ critical areas to remain vigilant to prevent sabotage, to remain readiness to combat
emergency and to keep normal operation going.
Prior Emergency Situation
Set up crisis management centre and manned continuously.
Crisis Management Group (CMG) to declare plan / guidelines to be followed which could be
based on Government of India / Statutory bodies / Indian Navy / Air force / Government of
Maharashtra etc. instructions.
CMG to ensure utmost vigilance in identified critical area to ensure the adequate resources in
terms of security personnel, experts in handling equipment’s, trained manpower, flood lights,
earth moving equipment’s, mobile cranes, rescue crafts are available to guard all gates, roads
etc. In case of any unidentified person is found, he must be handed over to police.
CMG to ensure that evacuation plan is prepared and backup systems such as power
generator, communication equipment’s, safety systems are working. CMG should also ensure
that all required manpower such as electricians / technicians/labour are available any time.
During the Emergency
CMG to adopt relevant Emergency Action Plan to combat the emergency.
In case of an enemy attack inform relevant authorities & internal security to defend
installations.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 359
When additional security (army/BSF) arrives, situation is to be handled jointly.
CMG to ensure sufficient supply of food and water is available.
GUIDELINES FOR ASSESSMENT OF TIME TO RESTORE A PORT TO NORMAL
OPERATIONAL CAPABILITY AFTER A CYCLONE / EARTH QUAKE
An analysis of past incidents and time taken for restoration of the port to operational status is a useful
tool-however the interpretation of the data results will require modifications in line with the
intensity/duration of the current incident and steps and resources used to mitigate the effects pre to
post cyclone.
Table 7.45: Detail of Steps and Resources Used To Mitigate the Effects Pre to Post Cyclone
Nature of Restoration to Port Units Depts & Resources Used Restoration
Administrative building damage Roads & Bldg division 1-3 days
Power Supply – restore sub stations Port Elect Divn <2 days
Damage to tugs – floating craft ME Divn-Tug Engineer Divn 2-18 days
Sunk/grounded vessels- Salvage Efforts 1-3 weeks
Hydrographic survey channels/berths Sr Hydrographic Surveyor 1-3 weeks
Damaged buoys- shifting of buoys DC-HM-Harbour works Divn I & II 4 days
Oil/ Chemical Storage Tanks Port to check integrity 2 days
Road blockades-clear debris-fallen trees Roads & Bldg dept 1 week
Repair damaged roads Roads & Bldg dept <1 week
Injury & infection-medical treatment Medical Department 1 week
Flooding & stagnant water - clean drains Public Health Divn (Civil) 3 days
Fishing harbour-survey-damaged trawlers Fishing Harbour Divn 1-2 weeks
Civil works –sea wall- Jetty-fenders- DC-HM-Harbour works Divn I & II 1 week
Electrical & mech works Elect. & Mech. Department 1 week
Pipeline –manifolds-isolation valves Bhavanapadu Port to check integrity 2 days
Spillage of chemical-Petroleum Oil products DC-Salvage Team-Coast Guards 4 days
Damage to Mobile cranes Cargo Handling Divn. <1 week
Wharf cranes Cargo Handling Divn. <1 week
Ship loaders-reclaimers-stackers-conveyors IOHP & MCHP Divn. <1 week
Checking of damaged railway lines Port Railway Division < 1 week
Checking of transit sheds, ware houses Traffic department 3 days
Checking of quarters of port employees Roads & Bldg division 3 weeks
Checking and rectification of drinking water PhD Mech ( Civil) 2 days
FOREST LAND ACQUISITION
Forest land proposed to be diverted is 2.99 Acres (1.21ha) which will be used for internal connectivity of
road for transportation of dry clean cargo and operational material and staff and conveyor belt for
transporting coal. This is necessary forest land for port back up area and immediate back up area. Forest
Diversion proposal is in process as per the Forest (Conservation) Act 1980. Compensatory Afforestation cost for
land is envisaged @ INR 10 lakhs per ha which amounts to @ INR 12.10 lakhs and NPV cost for land is
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 360
envisaged @ INR 4.4 lakhs per ha which amounts to @ INR 5.32 lakhs The total cost of Forest Diversion
Land amounts to @ INR 17.4 lakhs, Detail is given in chapter 10 (Section 10.6.2).
Table 7.46: Details of Divisions involved Details of Divisions involved
S.no Division Name Forest Land(Ac.) Non-ForestLand(Ac.)
1 Srikakulam 2.99 1007.01
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 361
CHAPTER 8 PROJECT BENEFITS
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 362
8 PROJECT BENEFITS
8.1 INTRODUCTION
Infrastructure construction will have both impacts on the country's economic development. The project
is intended to encourage private firms to engage in the development of the industrial and
transportation sectors. Private investments will generate jobs, which will in turn generate income,
alleviate poverty and enhance living standards of the people.
Potential positive benefits aniticpiated to result from the proposed port development are listed below.
Improved sea transport facilities
Revenue Generation
Better employment opportunities (skilled, semi-skilled and unskilled labour during construction
and operation phases of the project with specific attention to employment potential of local
population)
Improvement in Physical Infrastructure like project infrastructure and ancillary industries
Improvement in social infrastructure like roads, railways, townships, housing, water supply,
electrical power, drainage, educational institutions, hospitals, improved environmental
conditions etc.
Reduction of material costs due to reduction of transport cost.
The project and its benefits must be taken for the overall port project in its entirety. As a part of
the port project, there are several components that are linked to the port which will also add to
the list of benefits. For example, the road and rail connectivity, which will play an integral part
in the overall undertaking, will also bring several benefits to the region. The benefits of all these
components which will together be integrated with the port development are detailed in the
following sections.
8.2 INDUCED DEVELOPEMENT
The proposed port significantly improves the location's suitability for numerous sectors. Benefits can be
gained by creating or providing direct or indirect jobs for local residents. The additional connectivity will
make it easier to trade and advertise local items, as well as add value to those products. The proposed
port development will be a boon for the development of the local area and the region.
Apart from the surrounding region, the proposed port would provide maximum benefits to the
neighbouring State as a result of a number of triggered chain reactions for new development. Other
advantages include the generation of direct or indirect jobs for local residents. The increased rail and
road connectivity will help to boost local product trading and marketing, as well as value addition. In
addition to other socioeconomic benefits, the proposed port's road/rail connectivity will be critical in
making the proposed port a boon for the region's development.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 363
8.3 IMPROVED SOCIO-ECONOMIC CONDITIONS
The proposed port is likely to have positive impact on the socio economic conditions of the region. The
social infrastructure in the region is likely to change due to the creation of more job opportunities and
avenues for income generation. People will have higher income due to direct as well as
indirectemployment and will have higher earning and purchasing capacities.
The proposed project will have a positive impact on the socio economic conditions of the region. The
social infrastructure in the region is likely to change due to the creation of more job opportunities forthe
local people and avenues for income generation. This will allow the dependency changes and there will
be more than one earning member in the family, which will provide economic freedom. People will have
higher income due to direct employment as well as indirect employment and will have higher earning
and buying capacities. Primary schools, primary health care centre, play ground, community hall, and
Tsunami shelter will be developed for the project affected families as well as for the surrounding
communities.
8.4 EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES
The development of proposed port is estimated to generate both direct and indirect employment
opportunities. Details of employment opportunities during construction and operation phase are given
below:
Table 8.1: Details of employment opportunities during construction and operation phase S.No Particulars Nos
1. For Operation Port Staff (Regular + Contract) for (4 Berths, Initially during Phase-1) 2,500
2. For Construction: Port. Contractor and Concessionaire Staff during Phase-1 7,500
Total Employment Generation during Phase-1 10,000
8.5 HEALTH, SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENT (HSE)
Health: It is envisaged to create health infrastructure in the form of primary health center, which will be
beneficial to the employees and also local people living in the region as their dependence on nearby
towns and cities for quality medical treatment will be reduced. It is also proposed to provide fully
equipped ambulance, paramedical and medical staff which will lead to better health conditions of the
local people. Improved sanitation facilities, solid waste management systems and overall health, safety
and environmental awareness will improve to new levels.
Safety: Safety of the fisherman venturing to sea will be improved ever before due to the many fold
improved safety equipment’s, vessels, facilities and coast guard and defense facilities.
Environment: The various environmental facilities and infrastructure planned in the area, once become
fully operational will certainly improve the environmental condition of the area. This includes solid
waste management facility, water and sewage treatment plant, in-house PHC, infrastructure facilities
with land and structure compensation, cyclone shelters near Naupada, etc.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 364
8.6 ECONOMIC BENEFITS FOR PORT ALIGNED INDUSTRIES
Port and port aligned industries will be flourished once the port becomes operational. Sectors such as
cement industries, steel industries, power plant, etc shall be flourished, thereby giving economic boost
to the overall area in and around Bhavanapadu, including the catchment area of Bhavanapadu.
8.7 OTHER TANGIBLE BENEFITS
The other benefits that the project will provide are as follows:
Shall provide closer interaction and understanding between people from different regions,
culture, social traits etc.
Shall improve the general living standards and knowledge sharing bringing modern outlook and
vision for growth and economic prosperity.
Shall benefit to the State and Central Governments by way of royalty, sales tax, duties etc. from
this project. This in turn will help in development activities by Government in the area.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 365
CHAPTER 9
ENVIRONMETAL COST BENEFIT
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 366
9 Environmental Cost Benefit Analysis
The proposed Greenfield project falls under the schedule 7 (e), category ‘A’ as per the EIA Notification,
2006.
The environmental cost benefit analysis was not made mandatory in the project specific terms of
references accorded vide F.No. 10-56/2020-IA.III dated September 01, 2021 to the proposed Greenfield
Bhavanapadu port project by the Expert Appraisal Committee with reference to the Proposal No.
IA/AP/MIS/173542/2020.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 367
CHAPTER 10 ENVIRONMETAL MANAGEMENT
PLAN
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 368
10 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
10.1 INTRODUCTION
Identification and prediction of impacts further needs to suggest the mitigation measures, which would
play a vital role in prevention of environmental degradation during construction and operational phase
of the port. This leads to preparation of Environmental Management Plan (EMP). Environmental
Management Plan therefore forms an imperative part of EIA process.
The Environmental Management Plan needs to be integrated in overall project planning process
covering all phases of project cycles i.e., location, design, construction and operation. Management by
provision of necessary safeguard in planning of the project itself can lead to reduction of adverse
environmental impacts due to project. This chapter spells out the set of measures to be undertaken
during project construction and operation to reduce, mitigate, or bring down the adverse environmental
impacts to acceptable level based on the proposed Environmental Management Plan. The most reliable
way to ensure that the plan will be integrated into the overall project planning and implementation is to
include the plan as an integral component of the project. This will ensure that it receives funding and
supervision along with other investment components.
The Environmental Management plan is a site-specific plan developed to ensure that the project is
implemented in an environmentally sustainable manner where all stakeholders like project proponent,
users, contractors and subcontractors, including consultants if any, understand the potential
environmental risks arising from the project and take appropriate actions to minimize those risks. EMP
also ensures that the project implementation is carried out in accordance with the planned design and
by taking appropriate mitigation actions to reduce adverse environmental impacts during project’s life
cycle.
Environmental Management Plan is a plan that seeks to achieve a required end state and describes how
activities that have or could have an adverse impact on the environment, will be mitigated, controlled,
and monitored.
The EMP would, hence be a working document that concerned stakeholders need to both understand
environmental concerns and to address associated issues to facilitate environmental management. The
project will create certain inevitable impacts, during construction and operational phase, although
within permissible limits as mentioned in Chapter 4 and can be reduced significantly with the help of
effective implementation of a well-designed EMP. Some of the parameters, which need to be regulated,
are mentioned below:
Marine environment management during construction and operation phases
Air pollution due to the emission of particulate matter and gaseous pollutants from operation of
D.G. Sets during power failure and vehicular movement;
Noise pollution due to various noise generating equipment as well as vehicular movement;
Water resource management to ensure continuous water supply.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 369
Wastewater generation from sanitary/domestic activities; and
Generation of municipal solid wastes from residences/offices, maintenance of roads, parks,
common areas including constructional, electrical and plumbing wastes.
To ensure better environment in & around the project site, effective EMP is developed
separately for construction and operational phase.
A regular monitoring programme needs to be specified in order to check that environmental measures
are working and to alert port and pollution control boards to any pollution or other environmental
problems that might occur during either the construction or operational phase of the project.
Components and strategies for environmental management plan is shown in Figure 10.1.
Figure 10.1 Components and Strategies for Environmental Management Plan2
ADMINISTRATIVE AND TECHNICAL SETUP FOR EMP
Qualified and experienced persons in the field of Environmental Management of Ports shall be
considered for the positions of Joint General Manager (GM) and Deputy General Managers (DGM) for
Environmental management.
Well qualified personnel with minimum qualification of graduation in the respective discipline and
minimum of Five (5) years of experience in relevant field shall be considered for the third level positions
as mentioned in the organisation setup.
2 A. K. Gupta 2005, Clean Techn Environ Policy (2005) 7: 133–141
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 370
INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK OF EMP
The proposed organization of all personnel involved in the EMP process. The roles and responsibilities of
the various parties involved in the EMP process are summarized below.
Project Proponent: Bhavanapadu Port, APMB, Environmental Management Cell
Project Design, Construct and Operate: Contractor employed by the Project Proponent to carry out
design, construction and operate the port
Environmental Management Team (EMT): The EMT will be responsible for implementing all
environmental measures and EMP requirements recommended in the EIA Report throughout the
construction, operation, restoration, aftercare of the port and report to the Port Contractor on all
environmental aspects of the Project.
Independent Consultant (IC): The IC will be appointed by the Project Proponent to provide an
independent review and certification of the design, construction, operation, restoration and aftercare of
the port.
Independent Environmental Checker (IEC): The IEC will be appointed by the Project Proponent as part
of the IC to provide independent monitoring and audit to verify the overall environmental performance
of the project and to assess the effectiveness of the ET in their duties. An IEC will be responsible to
certify all environmental submissions to the Environmental Protection Division (EPD).
Environmental Protection Division (EPD): The Project EPD will be the authority to approve all
submissions.
LEGISLATIVE COMPLIANCE
The various clearances required for the proposed project such as EC and CRZ Clearance are
mentioned in the Chapter 1 – Section 1.1.
In addition to the clearance obtained from MoEF&CC and APCZMA. The project proponent has to
follow all the rules and regulations as prescribed by various statutory bodies and acts and laws
passed for the protection of the environment from time to time by both the state and central
government.
In addition to these various other legislative impacts will arise from time to time due to the varied
nature of the cargo being handled and also the fact that shipping is by default a global industry which
comes with its own set of International regulations that will be applicable to both the ships and ports
accommodating them.
Some of the other legislations that will be applicable to the development and operation of the port are
mentioned here for a guidance.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 371
10.1.3.1 International Regulations (India having given acceptance or through tacit
acceptance)
Marpol Regulations (Marine Pollution Prevention Regulations)
Pollution from Oil, Chemical, Dangerous Goods, Sewage, Garbage, Emissions from Ships,
Ballast water of Ships, Anti Fouling Coating on ships, and Green Passport for Ship recycling etc.
Solas regulations (Safety of Life at Sea)
Aspects on Construction, Fire Safety, Safety of Crew, Emergency requirements, Collision
Prevention requirements, Communication Requirements etc.
UNCLOS (UN Convention on the law of Seas )
NATIONAL REGULATIONS
Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 – amended from time to time
Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 – amended from time to time
The Offshore Areas Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 2002
Merchant Shipping, Act 1958 – amended from time to time
The Manufacture, Storage and Import of Hazardous Chemicals Rule, Act 1989
It is recommended that the project proponent has to establish a dedicated officer who shall be
responsible for the upkeep of all statutory compliance requirements and will be able to advice on the
requirements from time to time.
ENVIRONMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN
The potentially negative impacts of proposed Bhavanapadu port are expected during construction
phases. Good constructions practices are key to minimize, if not eliminate such negative impacts. The
measures to be adopted during the construction phase to mitigate the adverse impacts are described in
the following paragraphs
AMBIENT AIR QUALITY
10.1.6.1 Mitigation Measures for Construction Phase
The Contractor must take all reasonable steps to minimize dust nuisance during the construction of the
Works.
The major source of air pollution in the proposed project is the increased vehicular movement and
fugitive dust emissions during project construction activity like loading, unloading of muck and its
transportation and DG set operation. Thus, following mitigation measures are recommended:
Loading and unloading of muck and other material in covered shed.
Providing dust suppression system in unloading area.
Developing avenue and curtain plantation on the internal roads and peripheral plantation
around the site to protect the movement of dust and other pollutants.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 372
Cover scaffolding, hosing down road surfaces and cleaning of vehicles.
Vehicles having pollution under control certificate will be allowed to ply.
Use of covering sheets for trucks to prevent dust dispersion from the trucks.
Reducing the speed of a vehicle to 20 km/hr to reduce emissions on site.
All material storages will be adequately covered and contained.
Best practices for maintenance and repair of all vehicles.
Procedure for regular monitoring should be installed to ensure that emissions from DG sets are
well below the prescribed emission standards for DG sets.
Adequate stack height for DG set as per CPCB norms shall be provided.
10.1.6.2 Mitigation Measures for Operation Phase
During operational phase, dust generation will emit from handling, loading, unloading and storage of
coal, cement and other bulk cargo commodities. Dust suppression system has to be provided to control
the dust.
Water sprinkler system covering the stack yard and wharf shall be provided. Water sprinkling
after the event of commodities loading/unloading shall be ensured.
Continuous monitoring of air quality should be done and displayed.
Development of green belt surrounding the port area shall be ensured.
Compliance with Andhra Pradesh Pollution Control Board guidelines on handling, storage and
transport of commodities like coal etc. shall be ensured.
Periodic water sprinkling in high dust areas inside the port to be carried out.
Vehicle with valid PUC certificate shall only be allowed inside the Port premises for operations.
Detailed vehicle/ Truck management plan shall be developed and its recommendations shall
be strictly adhered to minimize impact due to material transport.
Fugitive work emission in the work area (wharf, stack yard etc.) shall be monitored. Emission
shall conform to the standards prescribed by authorities such as Directorate of Industrial
Health and Safety.
Adequate stack height for DG set as per CPCB norms shall be provided.
From the risk point of view and also from the Environment Mitigation aspect the following
Precautions to be followed for Coal Storage in the Port.
Different grades of Coal shall not be stacked together.
The pile height shall be limited at 15 m.
Inert Gas system shall be provided in coal stack yard for safety as per engineering feasibility.
Water mist system must be activated when ambient temp exceeds 43°C (this will minimize
spontaneous ignition). This option or other relevant safety measures as per engineering
Feasibility to be implemented.
As a rule, first come first go system should be followed for coal storage.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 373
Fire Hydrant system must be checked and kept operationally ready.
If the above mitigations are implemented, then impacts on air quality during construction and
operational activities can be minimized.
During the operation phase, substantial Vehicular Movement is expected resulting in air pollution, if not
mitigated/regulated. In addition, emissions from DG set stacks during power failure will also need to be
reduced. Hence, following measures will be adopted for pollution control in the project:
DG Set: The running of DG sets will result in emission of various pollutants. To achieve adequate
natural dispersion, stack height will be provided to DG sets respectively in accordance with the
guidelines of Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB).
Traffic pollution management: Internal roads would be maintained in good conditions to control
the dust emissions. Awareness will be raised amongst the employees for use of low sulphur fuel.
Air Quality Monitoring
Air Quality monitoring in Construction areas and during operation phase shall be undertaken by
the Contractor in compliance with EIA guidelines. Monitoring plan developed as part of CEMP
shall include the following elements on air emissions management.
NOISE ENVIRONMENT
The construction phases are likely to increase the vehicular traffic, drilling and excavation, DG set
operation in the area, which can lead to increase in the ambient noise levels mainly along the road
alignment. It is proposed to develop a greenbelt along the road stretches near to the habitation sites.
During construction phase, use of various construction equipment is the major source of noise.
However, based on the modeling studies, the noise due to operation of various construction equipment
is not likely to have any adverse impact on the habitations in nearby villages. However, efforts need to
be made to reduce the noise generated by the various construction equipment. The various measures
that could be implemented are as follows:
The noise generated dust to drilling is within the standards prescribed by Occupational Safety
and Health Administration (OSHA) for 8-hour exposure i.e. 90 dB(A). It is worth mentioning here
that Port and harbour shall be carried in a shift of 8 hours and the equivalent noise level
exposure during the shift shall be less than the safety limit of 90 dB(A).
The drilling is contemplated to be carried out by DTH drills with compressor which entail a noise
level of 88.0 Db (A) and will be a worst-case scenario.
Noise from air compressors to be reduced by fitting exhaust mufflers and intake mufflers.
Vehicles and construction equipment with internal combustion engines without proper silencer
will not be allowed to operate at the construction site.
Loading and unloading operation would be done in such a manner to ensure minimum noise
generation.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 374
Chassis and engine structural vibration noise can be dealt by isolating the engine from the
chassis and by covering various sections of the engines.
Temporary noise barriers will be constructed around high noise equipment
Exposure of workers near the high noise levels areas can be minimized. This can be achieved by
job rotation/automation, use of ear plugs, etc
The Afforestation land with Casuarina Plantations which is the green buffer (width ranging from
100 m to 300 m) between Harbour and immediate port backup area and the backup area which
will be untouched will provide noise absorbing barrier for activities within the immediate port
backup area thereby reducing the noise levels less than envisaged by the stimulation of Noise
model Dhawani PRO version 3.6.
Provision and maintenance of thick tree belts to screen noise all along the boundary of Port and
coal stack yard has been planned.
Avenue plantation within the project area will also further dampen the noise impact.
Proper maintenance of noise generating transport vehicles shall be complied during
construction and operation phases.
Regular noise level monitoring shall be carried out periodically for taking corrective action and
reporting will be
Provision of protective devices like ear muffs/ear plugs to those workers who cannot be
isolated from the source of noise will be provided by the Contractor and OH&SAS 18001 will be
implemented during construction and Operation phase
Reducing the exposure time of workers to the higher noise levels by rotation.
Staggering operations of noisy equipment’s will be practised during peak construction period
and Operation period.
SURFACE WATER QUALITY
10.1.8.1 Surface Water Quality Impacts
The primary concerns relating to surface water quality associated with construction activities are
pointed out below:
Runoff related to unpaved and excavated areas during the rain shower.
Sediments transported to runoff from the construction site.
Run off related to area where lubricant, fuel other materials are stored, used and disposed, off.
The surface water quality might be affected with the discharge of the runoff from the project site. The
impact to the surface water bodies could arise from the increased soil erosion from excavated site only
causing increase in the suspended particles and turbidity of runoff water from the site. However, this
impact would be temporary in the nature and would be observed in first rain only and as soon as rain is
over excavated soil at site would be stabilized. Therefore, the surface water quality during rains would
be impacted marginally for very short duration.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 375
10.1.8.2 Mitigation Measures for Construction Phase
The impact on lake water quality during construction phase was minimized by adopting following
measures;
Excavation during dry season and proper management of excavated soils
Clearing all debris from site as soon as construction is over.
By providing proper hutment and toilet facilities for construction labour
Through the proper disposal of sullage generated at site.
10.1.8.3 Mitigation Measures for Operation Phase
The surface water may get polluted in terms of suspended solids, heavy metals etc. as these pollutants
may enter these water systems through diffused locations on coal/bulk cargo stack yards.
The water quality of the surface water must be monitored for any sources of contamination
and best possible care will be taken to protect the surface water resources in the area.
All steps will be taken to avoid spillage of bulk cargo, oil and other materials into the river.
Slope of the bulk cargo storage facility will be towards landward side to avoid storm water
draining into the river.
Runoff will be collected in a sump and allowed to settle. An oil separator will be installed prior to
the sump to arrest oil and grease from entering into the sump. Clear water from the sump will
be allowed to overflow to the existing storm water drain of ultimate disposal. In addition, to
prevent or minimize storm water pollution appropriate storm water pollution prevention plan
(SWPPP) will be developed. SWPPP will be specific, because every unit is unique with source,
type and volume of contaminated storm water discharge.
Bulk cargo area will be paved and made impermeable for any leachate to percolate to the
subsurface water table.
All vessels will be sized such that adequate clearance is maintained between vessels and the
riverbed in all tide conditions, to ensure that undue turbidity is not generated by turbulence
from vessel movement or propeller wash. No vessels will be allowed to discharge their garbage
in the river. Such garbage should be disposed off in the shore bins available at jetties.
The decks of all vessels will be kept tidy and free of oil or other substances that might be
accidentally or otherwise washed overboard. Litter and loose objects, e.g. tools, will not be left
lying around.
Dredged material will be transported and disposed of in such a manner to minimize loss of
contaminants either into solution or by resuspension.
Ballast and bilge water will be, handed over to registered re-refiners or treated at ballast water
treatment plant available in Bhavanapadu port.
While pumping out bilge and ballast water from ship to shore, care will be taken to avoid
spillage
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 376
Cleaning and removing muds from ballast tanks and sediments will be done under strict
supervision and the same will be discharged only at the shore reception facilities.
Surface runoff from storage yard area shall be directed to drainage channel connecting the
settling ponds (for settling down suspended load) and the outflow may be directed to ETP.
Surface runoff from coal berth area shall be managed by collecting it and sending to
sedimentation tank. There should not be washing and disposal into CRZ area.
Construction wastes like rubbish, food wastes, oil or chemicals etc. will not be disposed off into
the river.
Adequate measures to be adopted for rainwater harvesting and reusing. Rainwater harvesting
is the collection and storage of rain and prevent runoff. Most rooftops provide the necessary
platform for collecting water. Thus, all the port buildings must be provided with rainwater
harvesting structure.
Tidal exchange of creeks and other water bodies must be maintained by regular monitoring of
the shore line and sedimentation of the active seasonal creek mouths.
GROUND WATER QUALITY
For construction/operation purposes water required for this port will be available from the nearby
reservoir. It is also explored to obtain water from the major water reservoirs available in the proximity
of Bhavanpadu port project site in Srikakulam district namely B.R.R. Vamsadhara, Gotta barrage,
Thottapalli barrage and Narayanapuram anicut. On the above, Gotta barrage is about 50 km from
Bhavanapadu. Pipe line from the reservoir shall be provided for supply of water shall be explored. No
proposals for extraction of ground water is envisaged in the present development.
No hazardous chemical and material shall be used in the development and construction phase of the
project. Debris and wastes that will be generated during construction phase shall be collected and
disposed suitably. Therefore, possibility of contamination of ground water is negligible. Hence, no
impact is anticipated on the ground water quality.
No ground water will be used during operation phase, so no impact on ground water table is
anticipated.
10.1.9.1 Ground Water Hydrology
It is proposed to conserve groundwater resources through the combined means of water resource
development, minimized water consumption and reuse of treated wastewater to reduce freshwater
demand.
The requirement of water for green belt is met from the STP treated water so no impact on ground
water hydrology.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 377
WASTE MANAGEMENT
10.1.10.1 Waste Water management plan
The proposed port project generates 356 KLD of wastewater, which is treated in 618 KLD
capacity of STP. The treated wastewater is recycled completely in the campus for horticulture
and flushing purpose, maintaining a zero-discharge system.
About 11.6 kg per day of sewage sludge is generated from the STP plant which is dried and later
used as manure for green belt development.
There is no discharge of untreated sewage on land or into water bodies.
MITIGATION MEASURES DURING CONSTRUCTION/OPERATION PHASE
Sewage (Domestic effluent) generated during construction phase/ operational phase will be
treated in Sewage Treatment Plant.
The biodegradable part of the waste would be treated in waste effluent treatment plant and
the remains of the treatment is used for manure or compost. The non-biodegradable part of
the waste is sent to local dump yard.
Workshop effluents: Effluents generated by servicing of the vehicles contain pollutants such as
suspended solids, oil & grease. Oil and grease trap shall be provided to such effluents.
Settling tanks shall be provided for cleaning the wastewater from the site workshop.
Effluent shall be discharged only to the place mentioned in the CEMP or else effluent to be
discharged only on land after treatment for sprinkling or horticulture within the site. No
discharge in the sea or any other receptor shall be undertaken until or unless permitted by the
APPCB.
Water Quality Monitoring: The Contractor shall engage APPCB/CPCB/MoEF & CC approved
laboratory to undertake environment monitoring.
Storm Water Drainage will be through a system of underground covered drains provided to
discharge the collected runoff into the natural waterways already existing so that storm water
is drained from all areas of port operations quickly. Sewage system will handle the sewage of
the port including the used oil etc. but these would be treated before discharging into the
water body. Underground sewage tanks are proposed to be provided on each berth.
Also Water Treatment Plant will be provided with facilities like Pressure Sand Filter , Water
Softener , Salt Saturator Assembly , Chlorinator , Collected waste oil will be sent to authorize
TSDF Facility
Oil waste water generated in ships/launches shall be handed over to registered re-refiners or
be taken to ballast Water Treatment Plant for disposal.
No discharge of wastewater/sewage into CRZ areas.
The Sewage/Effluent treatment plant inlet and outlet shall be monitored during operation
phase. The capital and recurring cost considered for the same is included in the Environmental
Management Plan.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 378
10.1.11.1 Solid and Hazardous Waste Management Plan
The overall objective of solid waste management plan is to minimize impact of waste generated through
the following:
Minimise the amount of waste that is generated;
Maximise the amount of waste that is recovered for recycling – including segregation of
recyclable
wastes at source;
Minimise the amount of waste that is deposited at landfill;
Ensure any hazardous wastes (e.g. used oils, lead-acid batteries) are securely stored and
transferred to appropriate facilities;
Ensure all wastes are properly contained, labelled and disposed of in accordance with
National/local regulations; and
Ensure waste is disposed of in accordance with the waste management hierarchy.
At Bhavanapadu Port site:
The proposed Solid Waste Management Plan at Bhavanapadu Port is based on the concept of 3-R i.e.
Reduce, Reuse and Recycle. This plan is developed to manage solid wastes and to avoid any discharges
into the soil/land or water. It shall establish procedures for the storage, collection and disposal of waste,
hazardous and non-hazardous solid waste.
There is no industrial waste except waste water and solid waste from port activities.
Waste to be generated from port activities (Internal Infrastructure) breakwater construction,
stack yard development, port berth works, basin protection while constructing diaphragm wall,
Cargo Handling Equipment’s, dredging.
From External Infrastructure during provision of external power supply, provision of external
water supply, provision of external telecommunications, port road connectivity, port rail
connectivity.
Waste from excavation, debris, C&D waste (Cement, bricks and sand etc.), Recyclable Waste
(Metals, packaging Material, Electronic waste and Organic waste, hazardous waste is generated
during construction phase.
The solid waste mainly can be called as dry rubbish which consists of paper, packaging material,
plastic etc. in addition to MSW out of which biodegradable waste and inert/non-biodegradable
waste will be generated.
10.1.11.2 Mitigation Measures
The Contractor shall implement procedures and processing to pursue a goal of “zero” waste discharge
from his construction activities. The biodegradable part of the waste would be treated in waste effluent
treatment plant and the remains of the treatment is used for manure or compost. The no biodegradable
part of the waste is sent to local dump yard.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 379
This will require that the Contractor employ sustainable concepts and practices including recycling, re-
use, segregation, and others to minimize, if not eliminate, material and substances into the waste
stream.
Solid waste shall be segregated from hazardous waste/municipal solid waste and stored
separately till treatment/recycling, re-use.
Segregation of biodegradable and plastic wastes shall be done.
There shall not be any disposal of effluent/solid waste etc. into the sea.
Solid Waste generated at sites are to be collected and processed for recycling/re-use wherever
possible. Disposing it off landfill site shall be a last resort. The solid waste generated from the
harbour and port activities will be disposed off in scientific manner to secured landfill as per
Hazardous and Other Wastes (Management and Transboundary Movement) Rules, 2016.
The municipal solid waste generated which will be managed, treated or sent to authorize
recyclers. All solid waste generated from the construction and domestic activities shall be
collected, treated and disposed in such a manner so as not to cause environment pollution.
Plastics and rubber shall not be disposed off by burning and is to be handled and disposed as
per the draft plastic rules.
Hazardous wastes shall be handled, stored, managed and disposed off in compliance with the
relevant regulations.
Selection of disposal sites shall be carried out in consultation with APPCB, revenue department
and forest department in order to ensure that no natural drainage, productive lands or natural
habitat is adversely impacted due to disposal of waste.
The Contractor is required to implement procedures for waste minimization to reduce, reuse,
recycle and recover as much waste material or reuse as is practical. Waste minimization and
segregation shall be exercised during mobilization, installation, execution and demobilization
phases of the Works.
The Contractor shall endeavour to minimize waste materials such as equipment consumables,
packaging and the like. All scrap generated during construction shall be segregated into
components such as glass, paper products, aluminium, steel, rubber, insulation materials,
plastics, steel, wood and the like.
All excavated material, excess building materials and waste, other than material designated to
be stockpiled on the site, shall be removed from the Site and disposed off, in a legal manner.
No waste shall be disposed in the Coastal Regulation Zone (CRZ) area. All permits and approvals
necessary for the removal and disposal of demolition materials shall be obtained in advance. All
unused material shall be removed from site in a progressive manner either by use of a weekly
emptied dump hopper or similar removal arrangement.
The sellable wastes shall be sold only to the authorized vendors. The Site and surrounds shall
be kept tidy at all times.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 380
Selection of disposal sites shall be carried out in consultation with APPCB, revenue department
and forest department in order to ensure that no natural drainage, productive lands or natural
habitat is adversely impacted due to disposal of waste.
Dredging material
Wastes from construction activities may include spoils generated by dredging. Disposal of
dredged material on land may cause impacts on vegetation, leakage of contaminated
materials and salt, odour and other nuisances to the local community.
Construction work and dredging disturb bottom sediments and induce resuspension, dispersal
and settlement of such sediments. Dumping of dredged material directly alters bottom
configuration and biota and may disperse toxic or harmful chemicals around the disposal site.
Dredging material from the excavation shall be used in surface leveling at coal Stackyard area
and general cargo area or area for future expansion.
Top soil
Stockpiles of topsoil - located that it is not aligned along prominent wind direction & its height
should not exceed the permissible limit.
The topsoil generated due to port activities shall be used for surface levelling, surface profiling
& other places where the plantation is proposed.
Sewage sludge will be dewatered in filter press and will be mixed with organic waste manure
for utilization in the greenbelt in the Harbour backup and in other avenue
plantations/gardens/social forestry projects.
Loading/Unloading
Loading/unloading area should be equipped with firefighting facility including the fire hydrants.
Any spills or leakage in the area should be contained and cleaned immediately.
Adequate training in operation of heavy equipment.
Routine inspection of cranes and preventive maintenance to ensure safety operations.
Operations at lay down areas and stockyards are performed under strict supervision from
suitable
Trained personnel
Use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) such as gloves, masks, boots, etc.
Regular inspection and maintenance.
Good House Keeping and better solid waste management system
Following solid and hazardous waste management practice shall be followed during construction
phase.
Type of waste Applicable Rule Management method at site Mode of disposal to be followed
Hazardous Hazardous Waste Shall be stored in HDPE drums in isolated Through
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 381
waste Management Rules, 2016 place. authorized vendors
Municipal solid waste
Solid Waste Management Rules, 2016
Source segregation of waste and storage at site using waste bins.
Through authorized vendors
Construction waste/debris
Construction and Demolition (C&D) Waste Management Rules, 2016
Part of construction waste shall be used to strengthen the low-lying area of project site/ for approach road construction.
Through authorized vendors
Figure 10.2: Segregation Process from Identified Zones
LAND ENVIRONMENT
During construction phase, lot of ancillary developments like shops, restaurant, repair shops, etc. may
develop around the area. This may lead to additional load on the existing infrastructure in the area. The
following measures are recommended to be taken during construction phase:
Excavated material will be properly collected and stored within the project area.
Unwanted material will be properly disposed off in designated areas in consultation with the
Municipality.
All wastes, unused construction materials and construction equipment shall be removed from
the construction site after completion of the construction activities.
Hazardous wastes, generated during construction phase will be segregated in two categories
viz. usable and non-usable. Usable fractions will be handed over to the registered waste
recyclers and the non-usable fractions will be disposed off in consultation with the Municipality.
Recyclable solid waste be segregated & handed over to Material Management division for
recyclable. Non-recyclable waste to be handed over to Municipal authority.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 382
Proper storage and site practices would be encouraged to minimise the potential for damage or
contamination of construction materials.
Training of site personnel in proper waste management procedures would be undertaken.
SOCIO-ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT
The impact on nearby settlements during construction phase will be due to air pollution and the noise
generating activities. However, the activities are limited to the construction phase and will cease upon
completion of the construction. Hence, this impact is considered to be negligible and therefore can be
classified as insignificant.
The dust suppression measures such as sprinkling of water and suitable enclosures around the high
noise generating areas within construction area will be provided.
The noise generating equipment will be provided with suitable enclosures such that cumulative noise
will be within permissible limits.
BIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT
The proposed project is construction of port. It is advisable; tree cutting should be avoided during the
construction phase.
There is average number of vegetation present near proposed project premises. Biodiversity for
trees, shrubs and herbs indicates medium biodiversity in the area.
According to primary and secondary survey, a total of 140 tree species belonging to 49 families
were found in the study area. The primary and secondary survey reveals the presence of 69
shrub species in the study area and its environs.
As per the floristic study of project area, there are no rare and endangered species are found.
Small patched of mangrove are noticed in the port site with species such as Avicennia marina,
Mangrove plantation plan is proposed with budgetary provisions
A total of 15 mammalian species reported from the study area. A total of 10 species of
Amphibians and 33 species of reptiles were recorded during the survey period. Among the 22
species of reptiles 2 were turtles, 13 were lizards and 7 were snakes.
During the field surveys a total of 111 species were sighted. Out of the total 111 avi-faunal
species 25 species are migratory birds (Winter & Summer visitors).
Out of the total 15 mammalian species recorded from the study area Seven (07) species were
classified under Scheduled-II (Par-I) and Three (03) species under Schedule-III and four (04)
species under Schedule-IV. While No mammalian Species were listed under Schedule-I of the
Wildlife (Protection), Act, 1972.
No mammalian species is listed under IUCN Red list of Threatened Species Version 2019.3 as
Rare, Endangered and Threatened (RET) Species.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 383
With regards to amphibian species two (02) species were listed under Schedule-IV while no
schedule-I, II & III species were found in the study area. Similarly no herpetofauna of ecological
importance were found in the study area as per IUCN Red List.
Among Reptiles One (01) Schedule-I, three (03) Schedule-II and One (01) Schedule-IV species
were found in the study area. With regards to IUCN Red list of Threatened Species Version
2019.3 as Rare, Endangered and Threatened (RET) Species, three (03) Vulnerable and three (03)
Near Threatened Reptile species were found in the study area.
With regards to the avifaunal species one (01) Schedule-I were reported/observed in the study
area, whereas three (05) avi-faunal specie are listed as Near Threatened (NT) and one (01)
species is listed under Vulnerable category of IUCN Red list of Threatened Species Version
2019.3.
10.1.14.1 Impacts
Tekkali creek which is supporting piscivorous birds and mangroves is adjacent to the proposed port
development, appropriate mitigation measures are to be taken during construction and operation
phase. In appropriate management methods and unscientific approach may lead to adverse effects on
the surrounding creek.
10.1.14.2 Mitigation measures
All care shall be taken that trees shall be protected as far as possible while site clearing and
infrastructure development.
No construction waste shall be disposed to nearby creek area
No construction activities to be conducted during night time
In consultation with Forest Department, more than twice number of the trees will be planted in
lieu of trees removed.
No construction activity will be allowed during the monsoon season so as to avoid breeding
period of fishes.
Use of silt curtains is recommended to confine areas of high turbidity during dredging and pile
diving.
Controlled dumping of the dredged material will be carried out beyond 20 m depths in the sea
as a designated site.
Areas with high fish yield or used by locals for fishing shall be avoided.
Appropriate selection of equipment for pile driving and dredging.
Providing silt screen to avoid movement suspended solid for a longer distance.
Uniform disposal of dredged material at identified disposal location.
A well planned implementation programme based on contractors dredge management plan.
Compensatory Mangrove Conservation Plan and Biodiversity plan is developed for the Scheduled I
species is prepared with budgetary provisions.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 384
10.2 GREENBELT DEVELOPMENT
Green belt is plantation of trees for reducing the pollution as they absorb both gaseous and particulate
pollutant, thus removing them from atmosphere. Green plants form a surface capable of absorbing air
pollutants and forming sinks for pollutants, it improves the aesthetic value of local environment. Green
belts are planned open spaces safeguarded from developmental activities such as construction of
buildings, factories, any other infrastructural activities; these areas are used only for growing vegetation
cover. Green belts in and around industrial areas are important for maintaining ecological health of the
region.
Source oriented approach is advantageous where a single industry is situated and the pollutants emitted
by the same are sought to be contained. The receptor-oriented approach is desirable in urban /
industrial complexes with multiple sources of pollution are present along with human settlements in
between. Generally, it is stated that tolerant species should be planted in green belts, other aspects
considered for selection of green belts viz. bio-geographic regions, soil quality, distance between
species, width and height with reference to pollution source, ideal density of plants, etc.
Greenbelt development will be carried out in and around the proposed port along the roadside and on
the vacant areas to reduce pollution as well as to improve aesthetic value within port premises. Species
recommended by Forest department will be selected on the basis of air pollution tolerance index of
tree. During the development of the green belt within the project area, it has to be emphasized that
those native plant species should be planted which are good ornamental values and are fast growing
with excellent canopy cover.
OBJECTIVES OF GREENBELT DEVELOPMENT PLAN
The Greenbelt Development has the following objectives:
Moderating the effect of wind and incoming radiation To arrest soil erosion at the embankment slopes To reduce the impact of ever-increasing noise pollution caused due to increase in number of
Vehicles Provide a shelter belt around the project area for dust absorption and and habitat to the local
fauna Improve ambient air quality and increase aesthetic value Conserve soil and moisture and provide healthy climatic conditions Create awareness for environmental conservation and tree planting
Coastal plantation:
Government of India has initiated and created a greenbelt along the coastal zone on newly accreted
land, the riverine coastal belt and abandoned embankments. The coastal Greenbelt is the measure to
prevent coastal erosion and reduce other natural hazards by planting trees and creating forests along
the coasts. To protect the embankment from tidal surges through planting on its outer slope, and to
protect life and property in the region by embankment plantings, as well as planting in the agricultural
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 385
hinterland are of two main functions in coastal greenbelt. Casuarina equisetifolia, Cassia auriculiformis,
Eucalyptus globulus & Borassus flabellifer are the species selected for coast side dense plantation.
Rail & Road Corridor Plantation:
The road landscape is developed to maintain visual characteristics and uniformity in terms of landscape
along the stretch. To achieve this, the entire stretch of the project corridor has been divided into
homogenous landscape sections based on similarity in terms of available width, soil conditions, climate
(temperature and rainfall) and topography. A study on the local flora and vegetative cover native to
these sections was carried out as part of the field surveys to enable a choice of the suitable species for
particular section. Depending on the available ROW, plantation pattern has been
The first row along the road will be of small to medium sized ornamental trees.
Subsequent rows depending on the availability of width will comprise of ornamental and/or
shade bearing species, of more height than those in the first row. In rural sections the last row
will always be of shade bearing tall trees.
Planting of herbaceous species as ground cover, special landscapes, and embankment slopes.
Turfing with grass, special landscapes, and embankment slopes.
Block Plantations in Port:
Adequate green peripheral buffers (15m) are provided all along the port boundary. Adequate green
buffer of 50m will be maintained near Mangroves CRZ IA (as per norms), etc. and green buffers are
proposed near reserve forests will serve as lung space for the port. Tekkali Creek flows from North West,
a buffer of 100 m or width of the creek as per CRZ regulation is proposed and green areas will be
developed in the buffer area.
In overall Bhavanapadu Greenfield port area, an area of 218 acres (26.4%) is proposed under green
area.
Greenbelt is planned in 3 tiers i.e. Trees, Shrubs and Small bushes. These 3-tier plantation comprises of
native species as lower tier, bushes and shrubs as middle tier and trees as upper tier.
Indicative Sketch of Three Tier Greenbelt Development
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 386
10.2.1.1 Cost estimations for Greenbelt Development
An area of 218 ac. (88.09 ha) is earmarked for green areas and greenbelt development apart from green
belt within the port. There are block plantations within the project site. Typical industrial greenbelt on
all sides of the plant site with 5 to 10 m width patches and strips of greenbelt with a spacing of 2.5 m x
2.5 m (2500 trees per Ha) Using Model plantation and Enriched Plantation. Approximately 220225
numbers of trees are proposed to be planted in Bhavanapadu Phase I Port. The survival of the plantation
shall be monitored frequently and survival rate of the plantation during operational phase shall not be
less than 80%.
A capital cost of Rupees 3.40 Crores shall be earmarked for this purpose and Rupees 1.02 Crores shall be
allocated for recurring expenses per annum towards green belt development and maintenance. The
capital and recurring cost will be spent over a period of time based on the port development plan.
10.2.1.2 Species for Plantation
The selection of plant species for the development depends on various factors such as climate, elevation
and soil. The plants would exhibit the following desirable characteristics in order to be selected for
plantation.
The species should be wind-firm and deep rooted.
The species should be fast growing and providing optimum penetrability.
The species should form a dense canopy.
As far as possible, the species should be indigenous and locally available.
Species tolerance to air pollution like SO2 and NO2 should be preferred.
There should be no large gaps for the air to spill through.
Trees with high foliage density, leaves with larger leaf area and hairy on both the surfaces.
Ability to withstand conditions like inundation and drought.
Soil improving plants (Nitrogen fixing rapidly decomposable leaf litter).
Attractive appearance with good flowering and fruit bearing.
Bird and insect attracting tree species.
Sustainable green cover with minimal maintenance
The pollutants namely dust/fugitive emissions, sulphur dioxide, smoke and carbon dioxide along with
noise pollution can be effectively curbed by planting the below mentioned specific floral species.
Based on the above factors and the native tree species suggested for green belt development by the
Andhra Pradesh Forest Department is also consider for selecting the tree species for green belt
development in the port premises, the recommended species for greenbelt and plantation are given
below
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 387
Table 10-1 Recommended Plants for Greenbelt Development
S. No. Botanical name Local name No of trees
Importance in selection of species
Trees
1. Ficusbenghalensis Marri 9000 Native, Fast growing and Drought
resistance
2. Ficus religiosa Raavi 7000 Native, Fast growing and Drought
resistance
3. Holoptelea integrifolia Nemalinara 5200 Shady, Pollutant absorbing, Tall &
Evergreen
4. Lannea coromandelica Gumpena 7200 Native, Fast growing
5. Tamarindus indica Chinta 6000 Fruit bearing
6. Azadirachta indica Vepa 7000 Shady, Pollutant absorbing & Fast growing
7. Ailanthus excelsa Pedda manu 5200 Shady, Pollutant absorbing & Fast growing
8. Acacia nilotica Nalla thumma 5000 Native, Shady, Pollutant absorbing
9. Cassia fistula Rela 5200 Native, Shady, Fast growing
10. Anacardium occidentale Jeedimamidi 4500 Fast growing and fruiting bearing
11. Casuarina equisetifolia Sarugudu 6000 Wind resistance
12. Acacia auriculiformis Australia Tumma 7000 Salt resistant and fast growing
13. Anthocephalus cadamba Kadamba 5000 Broad leaved & Fast growing
14. Mangifera indica Mamidi 5000 Fruiting bearing
15. Mitragyna parvifolia Battaganapu 6000 Shady, Native & Fast growing
16. Phyllanthus emblica Usiri 5000 Native, Drought resistance
17. Spathodea campanulata Rugtoora 4025 Ornamental avenue tree
18. Syzygium cumini Neredu 8000 Shady, Fruiting bearing & Fast growing
19. Tectona grandis Teak 6000 Timber yielding
20. Terminalia arjuna Maddi 5300 Timber and shade tree
21. Terminalia bellirica Nalla maddi 8000 Native
22. Cocos nucifera Kobbari 9000 Fruit bearing
23. Wrightia tinctoria Aku pala 8000 Native, Drought resistance
24. Tabebuia rosea 7000 Ornamental, Drought resistance
25. Pongamia pinnata Adavi ganuga 7000 Fast growing and Drought resistance
26. Psidium guava Jama 8000 Fruiting bearing
27. Manilkara zapota Sapota 8000 Fruiting bearing
28. Bixa orellana Jabaru kaya 8200 Shady, Native & Fast growing
29. Alstonia scholaris Edakula pala 8200 Evergreen and Fast growing
30. Dendrocalamus strictus Veduru 9000 Tall growing, Sound barrier
31. Gmelina arborea Gummadi teku 4200 Broad leaved & Fast growing
32. Phoenix sylvestris Pedda itha 8000 Fruiting bearing and Drought resistance
33. Semecarpus anacardium Nallajeedi 9000 Fruiting bearing and Drought resistance
Total 220225
Shrubs/Bushes
34. Cassia glauca Konda tangedu Yellow Flowers
35. Jatropa podagarica Adavi amudam Red Flowers
36. Nerium oleander Ganneu Pink Flowers
37. Caesalpinia pulcherrima Ratnagandhi Red/Yellow Flowers
38. Cascabela thevetia Pacha Ganneru Yellow Flowers
39. Tecoma stans Pachagotla Yellow Flowers
40. Plumeria obtusa Devaganneru White Flowers
41. Duranta repens Duranta Blue Flowers
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 388
S. No. Botanical name Local name No of trees
Importance in selection of species
42. Hamelia patens Valambiri Red Flowers
43. Vitex negundo Vavili Native having medicinal Importance
44. Plumeria alba Devaganneru Native having aesthetic value
45. Aloe vera Kalabandha Drought resistance
46. Agave cylindrica Kitha nara Drought resistance
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 389
Figure 10.3 : Bhavanapadu Layout (Greenbelt)
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 390
Table 10-2 Per Ha. Cost Norms for Model Plantation Works Sl.No. Particular of Work Quantity Rate/Man day Total Man day Total Amount
per unit
First year preparation year
A. Labour Oriented Works
1 Survey and demarcation of plantation area 1 ha 0.45 man day /ha 0.45 130.05
2 Weeding of obnoxious weeds except lantana 1 ha 4 man day/ha 4 1156
3 Dag Belling with line for siting pits 1100 2.5 man day/1000 no. 2.75 794.75
4 Digging pits 45x45x45 cm 1100 5 man day/100 no. 55 15895
5 Filling pits with FYM mix with soil and Pesticides 1100 1.5 man day/100 no. 16.5 4768.5
6 Preparation of Path 240m 30 man day/km 7.2 2080.8
Total Labour cost (A) 24825.1
B. Material Component
1 Cost of FYM including carriage @ 10% of volume of pit i.e. 1100(0.45x0.45x0.45) x0.1
10.03 m3 1200 / m3 0 12036
2 Providing fertile soil including carriage @ 10% of volume of pit i.e. 1100(0.45x0.45x0.45) x0.1
10.03 m3 500 Rs/m3 0 5016
3 Applying cost of Neem Cake @ 30g/pit 33 Kg 55 Rs/ Kg 0 1815
4 Cost of plant 1210 No. 11 Rs/Plant 0 13310
5 Cost of Service Pipe 100 RM 55 Rs/m 0 5500
6 Proportionate cost for providing irrigation implements like tank, pipe fittings & electric motor etc.
1 job L.S. 0 4200
7 Proportionate cost for providing chowkidar hut 1 job L.S. 0 2000
Total Material cost (B) 43877
C. Chain Link Fencing Work
1(a) Cost of 2m high RCC pole @ 2.5m c/c (145x1.1)/2.5=64 64 296.3/no. 0 18944
1(b) GST @18% Rs 18944 0.18 0 3410
2(a) Cost of barbed wire in five strands (145x5)/7=104 104 Kg 90 Rs /kg 0 9360
2(b) GST @18% 9360 0.18 0 1684.8
3(a) Cost of U-nails 10 Kg 90 Rs /kg 0 900
3(b) GST @18% 900 0.18 0 162
4(a) Cost of GI wire 3 Kg 100 Rs /kg 0 300
4(b) GST @18% 300 0.18 0 54
5 Cost of labour for stretching & fixing barbed wire and 145 0.16 Man day / RM 6.56 1521.192
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 391
Sl.No. Particular of Work Quantity Rate/Man day Total Man day Total Amount
per unit
other miscellaneous work
6 Excavation of pit for poles 64 2.5 man day/100 No. 1.6 371.2
7 Cost of fixing poles in pit with PCC 1:3:6 mix 2.32 m3 3643/m3 0 8451.8
8 Erection of poles 64 Rs 80/ Pole 0 5120
Total Fencing cost (C) 50278.992
Total Cost First year 118981.092
Second Year - Plantation Work
A. Labour Oriented Works
1 Carriage of plant raised in nursery over a distance of 45 Km 1210 No. 170/100 No. 0 2057
2 Carriage of plants from road side to plantation site by manual labour up to 2 Km
1100 0.4Man day/100 No 4.4 1399.2
3 Planting saplings in pits 1100 1.8 Man day/100 No 19.8 6296.4
4 Carrying out first weeding, nirai operations and application of fertilizer and pesticides including replacing of dead plants of previous year
1100 1.25 man day/100 No. 13.75 4372.5
5 Carrying out second weeding, nirai operations and application of fertilizer and pesticides including replacing of dead plants of previous year
1100 1 man day/100 No. 11 3498
6 Spraying pesticides and insecticides 1100 0.6 man day/100 No. 6.6 2098.8
7 Applying Irrigation 1 job L.S. 0 1600
8 Clearing of Fire lines 180 RM 2.25 man day/Km 0.41 128.8
Total Labour oriented Works cost (A) 21450.7
B. Material Component
1 Cost of fertilizer (DAP/Urea) and Pesticides @ 40g and 10g / plant respectively
55 Kg 24 Rs/kg 0 1320
2 Cost of Diesel for Irrigation 1 Job L.S. 0 1000
3 Contingency 1 Job L.S. 0 200
Total Material Component Cost (B) 2520
Total Second Year 23970.7
Third Year - Maintenance
A. Labour Oriented Works
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 392
Sl.No. Particular of Work Quantity Rate/Man day Total Man day Total Amount
per unit
1 Repair of fencing 1 ha. 2 man day/ha. 2 700
2 Cost of replacing of dead plants (10% mortality) 110 Rs 15 /No. 0 1650
3 Carriage of plant raised in nursery over a distance of 45 Km 110 No. 170/100 No. 0 187
4 Carriage of plants from road side to plantation site by manual labourupto 2 Km
110 0.4 Man day/100 No 0.44 154
5 Carrying out first weeding, nirai operations and application of fertilizer and pesticides including replacing of dead plants of previous year
1100 1.25 man day/100 No. 13.75 4812.5
6 Carrying out second weeding, nirai operations and application of fertilizer and pesticides including replacing of dead plants of previous year
1100 1 man day/100 No. 11 3850
7 Spraying pesticides and insecticides 1100 0.6 man day/100 No. 6.6 2310
8 Applying Irrigation 1 job L.S. 0 1600
9 Clearing of Fire lines 180 RM 2.25 man day/Km 0.41 143.5
Total Labour oriented Works cost (A) 15407
B. Material Component
1 Cost of fertilizer (DAP/Urea) and Pesticides @ 40g and 10g / plant respectively
55 Kg 24 Rs/kg 0 1320
2 Cost of Diesel for Irrigation 1 Job L.S. 0 1000
3 Contingency 1 Job L.S. 0 200
Total Material Component Cost (B) 2520
Total Third Year 17927
Fourth Year - Second year of Maintenance
A. Labour oriented works
1 Carrying out first weeding, nirai operations and application of fertilizer and pesticides including replacing of dead plants of previous year
1100 1.25 man-days/100 No. 13.75 5293.75
2 Applying Irrigation 1 job L.S. 0 1950
3 Watch and ward 1 job L.S. 0 3000
Total Labour oriented Works cost (A) 10243.75
B. Material Component
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 393
Sl.No. Particular of Work Quantity Rate/Man day Total Man day Total Amount
per unit
1 Cost of Diesel for Irrigation 1 Job L.S. 0 1100
2 Contingency 1 Job L.S. 0 200
Total Material Component (B) 1300
Total Fourth Year 11543.75
Fifth Year - Third year of Maintenance
A. Labour oriented works
1 Fencing repair 1 ha. 2 man-days/ha. 2 848
2 Watch and ward 1 job L.S. 0 3300
Total Labour oriented Works cost (A) 4148
B. Material Component
1 Contingency 1 Job L.S. 0 220
Total Material Component Cost (B) 220
Total Fifth Year 4368
Sixth Year - Fourth year of Maintenance
A. Labour oriented works
1 Watch and ward 1 job L.S. 0 3600
Total Labour oriented Works cost (A) 3600
B. Material Component
1 Contingency 1 Job L.S. 0 240
Total Material Component Cost (B) 240
Total Sixth Year 3840
Seventh Year - Fifth year of Maintenance
A. Labour oriented works
1 Watch and ward 1 job L.S. 0 4000
Total Labour oriented Works cost (A) 4000
B. Material Component
1 Contingency 1 Job L.S. 0 300
Total Material Component (B) 300
Total Seventh Year 4300
Abstract of Cost of Plantation and Maintenance
First year-preparation 118981.092
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 394
Sl.No. Particular of Work Quantity Rate/Man day Total Man day Total Amount
per unit
Second Year-Plantation 23970.7
Third year-First year of Maintenance 17927
Fourth year-Second year of Maintenance 11543.75
Fifth year-Third year of Maintenance 4368
Sixth year-Fourth year of Maintenance 3840
Seventh year-Fifth year of Maintenance 4300
Total Cost 184930.542
Say Rs 1.85 Lakh/ha.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 395
Table 10-3 Cost Analysis per Ha of Enrichment Plantation Sl.No Particular of Work Quantity Rate/Man day per unit Total Man day Total Amount (Rs)
First year preparation year
A. Labour oriented works
1 Survey and demarcation of plantation area 1 ha 0.45 man day /ha 0.45 130.05
2 Weeding of obnoxious weeds except lantena 1 ha 4 man day/ha 4 1156
3 Dag Belling with line for siting pits 500 2.5 man day/1000 no. 1.25 361.25
4 Digging pits 45x45x45 cm 500 5 man day/100 no. 25 7225
5 Filling pits with FYM mix with soil and Pesticides 500 1.5 man day/100 no. 7.5 2167.5
6 Preparation of Path 240m 30 man day/km 7.2 2080.8
Total Labour cost (A) 13120.6
1 Cost of FYM including carriage @ 10% of volume of pit i.e. 500(0.45x0.45x0.45) x0.1
4.56 m3 1200 / m3 0 5472
2 Providing fertile soil including carriage @ 10% of volume of pit i.e. 500(0.45x0.45x0.45) x0.1
4.56 m3 500 Rs/m3 0 2280
3 Applying cost of Neem Cake @ 30g/pit 15 Kg 55 Rs/ Kg 0 825
4 Cost of plant 550 No. 11 Rs/Plant 0 6050
5 Cost of Service Pipe 100 RM 55 Rs/m 0 5500
6 Proportionate cost for providing irrigation implements like tank, pipe fittings & electric motor etc.
1 job L.S. 0 4200
7 Proportionate cost for providing chowkidar hut 1 job L.S. 0 2000
Total Material cost (B) 26327
1(a) Cost of 2m high RCC pole @ 2.5m c/c (145x1.1)/2.5=64 64 296.3/no. 0 18963.2
1(b) GST@18% Rs 18963.2 0.18 0 3413.376
2(a) Cost of barbed wire in five strands (141x5)/7=100 100 Kg 90 Rs /kg 0 9000
2(b) GST@18% 9000 0.18 0 1620
3(a) Cost of U-nails 10 Kg 90 Rs /kg 0 900
3(b) GST@18% 900 0.18 0 162
4(a) Cost of GI wire 3 Kg 100 Rs /kg 0 300
4(b) GST@18% 300 0.18 0 54
5 Cost of labour for stretching & fixing barbed wire and other miscellaneous work
145 0.16 Mondays / RM 6.56 1521.9
6 Excavation of pit for poles 64 2.5 man-days/100 No. 1.6 371.2
7 Cost of fixing poles in pit with PCC 1:3:6 mix 2.32 m3 3643/m3 0 8451.8
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 396
Sl.No Particular of Work Quantity Rate/Man day per unit Total Man day Total Amount (Rs)
8 Erection of poles 64 Rs 80/ Pole 0 5120
Total Fencing cost (C) 49877.47
Total Cost First year 89325.07
Second Year - Plantation Work
A. Labour oriented works
1 Carriage of plant raised in nursery over a distance of 45 Km 550 No. 170/100 No. 0 935 2 Carriage of plants from road side to plantation site by manual labour
up to 2 Km 500 0.4Man day/100 No 2 636
3 Planting saplings in pits 500 1.8 man-days/100 No 9 2862 4 Carrying out first weeding, nirai operations and application of fertilizer
and pesticides including replacing of dead plants of previous year 500 1.25 man-days/100 No. 6.25 1987.5
5 Carrying out second weeding, nirai operations and application of fertilizer and pesticides including replacing of dead plants of previous year
500 1 man-days/100 No. 5 1590
6 Spraying pesticides and insecticides 500 0.6 man day/100 No. 3 954 7 Applying Irrigation 1 job L.S. 0 1600 8 Clearing of Fire lines 180 RM 2.25 man-days/Km 0.41 128.8
Total Labour oriented Works cost (A) 10693.3
B. Material Component
1 Cost of fertilizer (DAP/Urea) and Pesticides @ 40g and 10g / plant respectively
25 Kg 24 Rs/kg 0 600
2 Cost of Diesel for Irrigation 1 Job L.S. 0 1000 3 Contingency 1 Job L.S. 0 200 Total Material Component Cost (B) 1800 Total Second Year 12493.3
Third Year - Maintenance
A. Labour oriented works
1 Repair of fencing 1 ha. 2 man day/ha. 2 700 2 Cost of replacing of dead plants (10% mortality) 50 Rs 15 /No. 0 750 3 Carriage of plant raised in nursery over a distance of 45 Km 50 No. 170/100 No. 0 85 4 Carriage of plants from road side to plantation site by manual labour
up to 2 Km 50 0.4Man day/100 No 0.2 70
5 Carrying out first weeding, nirai operations and application of fertilizer 500 1.25 man-days/100 No. 6.25 2187.5
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 397
Sl.No Particular of Work Quantity Rate/Man day per unit Total Man day Total Amount (Rs)
and pesticides including replacing of dead plants of previous year
6 Carrying out second weeding, nirai operations and application of fertilizer and pesticides including replacing of dead plants of previous year
500 1 man day/100 No. 5 1750
7 Spraying pesticides and insecticides 500 0.6 man day/100 No. 3 1050 8 Applying Irrigation 1 job L.S. 0 1600 9 Clearing of Fire lines 180 RM 2.25 man day/Km 0.41 143.5 Total Labour oriented Works cost (A) 8336
B. Material Component
1 Cost of fertilizer (DAP/Urea) and Pesticides @ 40g and 10g / plant respectively
25 Kg 24 Rs/kg 0 600
2 Cost of Diesel for Irrigation 1 Job L.S. 0 1000
3 Contingency 1 Job L.S. 0 200
Total Material Component Cost (B) 1800
Total Third Year 10136
Fourth Year - Second year of Maintenance
A. Labour oriented works
1 Carrying out first weeding, nirai operations and application of fertilizer and pesticides including replacing of dead plants of previous year
500 1.25 man-days/100 No. 6.25 2406.25
2 Applying Irrigation 1 job L.S. 0 1950 3 Watch and ward 1 job L.S. 0 3000 Total Labour oriented Works cost (A) 7356.25
B. Material Component
1 Cost of Diesel for Irrigation 1 Job L.S. 0 1100
2 Contingency 1 Job L.S. 0 200
Total Material Component Cost (B) 1300
Total Fourth Year 8656.25
Fifth Year - Third year of Maintenance
A. Labour oriented works
1 Fencing repair 1 ha. 2 man-days/ha. 2 848 2 Watch and ward 1 job L.S. 0 3300 Total Labour oriented Works cost (A) 4148
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 398
Sl.No Particular of Work Quantity Rate/Man day per unit Total Man day Total Amount (Rs)
B. Material Component
1 Contingency 1 Job L.S. 0 220
Total Material Component Cost (B) 220
Total Fifth Year 4368
Sixth Year - Fourth year of Maintenance
A. Labour oriented works
1 Watch and ward 1 job L.S. 0 3600 Total Labour oriented Works cost (A) 3600
B. Material Component
1 Contingency 1 Job L.S. 0 240
Total Material Component Cost (B) 240
Total Sixth Year 3840
Seventh Year - Fifth year of Maintenance
A. Labour oriented works
1 Watch and ward 1 job L.S. 0 4000 Total Labour oriented Works cost (A) 4000 B. Material Component 1 Contingency 1 Job L.S. 0 300 Total Material Component Cost (B) 300
Total Seventh Year 4300
Abstract of Cost of Plantation and Maintenance
First year-preparation 89325.07
Second Year-Plantation 12493.30
Third year-First year of Maintenance 10136.00
Fourth year-Second year of Maintenance 8656.25
Fifth year-Third year of Maintenance 4368.00
Sixth year-Fourth year of Maintenance 3840.00
Seventh year-Fifth year of Maintenance 4300.00
Total Cost 133118.62
Say Rs 1.33lakh
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 399
Table 10-4 Total Cost Estimation for Green Belt Location for Green belt Area (ha) Capital Cost (lakh) Recurring cost(lakh) Total Cost(lakh)
Port and Harbour back up Area 80.94 313.24 93.89 407.13
Rood connectivity Area 7.15 27.67 8.294 35.96
Total Cost 443.09
Total area for green belt development is about 88.09 ha over which 2500 saplings would be planted per ha. Cost of Model plantation which is
amount to approx @INR 3.68 lacks per ha and Cost of Enrichment Plantation which is amount to aprox @INR 1.33 lacks per ha. Total cost
estimated for 88.94 (ha) green belt is @INR 4.4 Crores.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 400
OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH MANAGEMENT PLAN
OHSMP provides a systematic approach to meeting this requirement and the expectations workers and
other parties accessing port be
Safe workplaces, plant and systems of work;
Information, instruction training and supervision;
Consultation and cooperation with safety and health representatives;
Provision of adequate personal protective clothing and equipment to protect
Against hazards which cannot be eliminated; and arrangements in place such that the use,
cleaning, maintenance, transportation and disposal of plant, and the use, handling processing,
storage, transportation and disposal of substances are carried out in a manner such that
employees are not exposed to hazards.
Implementing occupational health can result in reducing accidents and at the same time safety
measures will reduce the port accident too. Different tasks in navigational services and handling services
to cargos are shown in table Table 10-5 and
Table 10-6.
Table 10-5 Different tasks in navigational services to ships Tasks during navigational
aids to ships
Occupational health risk factors Safety risk factors
Ship-shore telecommunication
Navigational aids
Anchorage
Pilot age
Locking
Towing
Mooring & unmooring
Berthing
Inappropriate working level
Shift work
Long time sitting position
Noise
Inappropriate colors of vts monitors
Electromagnetic waves
Low light or glow
Precise work (high attention)
Vibration
Movement of heavy items
Wrong working posture
Fall from height
Collision with moving objects
smash with mooring ropes
Fall to the sea
Danger of loose gears1
Dragging of tugboat toward ship
Losing tug boat power during
maneuvering
Table 10-6 Different tasks in handling services to cargos
Tasks during handling services to
cargo
Occupational health risk factors Safety risk factors
Lashing/unlashing
Opening/closing of holds
Handling on board
Quay transfer
Delivery/reception
Inappropriate working posture
Shift work
Long time sitting position
Height
Ultraviolet waves
Cold/ heat
Humidity
Fall from height
Smash with moving objects
Collision with lifting appliances
Fall of cargos
Fire
Explosion
Fall to the sea
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 401
Tasks during handling services to
cargo
Occupational health risk factors Safety risk factors
Precise work
Movement of heavy tools
Dangerous cargos
High speed operation
Chemicals and gases
Dust from cargoes
Confined space
Collision with transfer vehicles
Workers trapped by objects
RENEWABLE ENERGY AND ENERGY CONSERVATION PLAN
A key component in achieving energy efficiency would be the development of an energy management
action plan. This can range from simple work environment procedure to installation of real time energy
monitoring system. Best way to conserve energy is to save energy.
Energy will be consumed for operation of port and administrative activities. However, main area of
energy demand will be from loading & unloading operations and transportation of cargoes. Energy will
be consumed in the form of fuel and electricity.
Energy consumption and related emissions are contributing factor to GHG. Hence, proponent shall make
effort to optimize and manage energy consumption. Following approach shall be considered to manage
energy.
Formulate energy reduction plan (energy policy).
Conduct energy audit.
Identification of high consumption energy sources and reduction potential.
Monitoring system to evaluate energy consumption.
Optimum use of fuel for operation and road vehicle
Energy conservation measures which can be implemented during construction and operational
phase is given below.
Construction phase
Switch off construction equipment when not in use.
Switch off vehicles when they are in queue (at entry gate/loading & unloading area etc.).
Regular maintenance of equipment to ensure optimum operation and fuel efficiency.
Efficient work scheduling to minimize equipment idle time and material double handling.
Use construction debris to construct approach road.
Operation phase
Use energy efficient electrical appliances and cargo handling equipment.
Regular maintenance of equipment to ensure optimum operation and fuel efficiency.
Provide optimum lighting. Switch off lights, equipment & vehicles when not in use.
Follow latest BS emission standards (energy efficient and low emission) vehicle/cargo
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 402
handling equipment.
Rationalization of truck arrivals inside jetty premises.
Follow CPCB guidelines for purchase of DG sets.
Use LED lighting system.
10.1.1 CARGO MANAGEMENT PLAN
No handling of liquid cargo will be undertaken under this project, thus impact due to liquid cargo
spillage, odour, etc. are not applicable.
Leaching and run-off of contaminants in storm water: Run-off and the percolation of run- off
can cause adverse environmental impacts on the surface of the storage area, adjacent land,
surface water and groundwater and create contaminated sediments causing problems for
post dredging.
Generation of dust: Due to handling of dry bulk materials and blowing of dust from stack
yard.
72. Best management practice
Controlling storm water run-off: Stack yard should be kept compacted with steep sides and sloping
top. This will minimize the pollutant load during rain events compared to loosely constructed pile
with a wide base, gently sloping sides and a flat or slightly sloped top.
Stack yard shall be made impervious in nature, preferably with concrete or asphalt.
Surface runoff from stack yard area shall be directed to drainage channel connecting septic tank
– soak pit system/dump pond. Provision for screens/sedimentation tank shall be made to filter
suspended solids. Collected sediments shall be disposed off following statutory norms.
Inspecting storage areas after rainfall; observe run-off or storm water migration and
implement preventive measures, if required.
Maintaining an accurate, up to date inventory of materials delivered and stored on-site.
Surface runoff from wharf area shall be managed through dry sweeping. No washing and
disposal into CRZ/creek area shall be adopted.
Controlling dust generation:
Water sprinkling will be provided.
Suspend unloading/loading operation during unfavourable weather conditions.
Regularly inspection of dry bulk storage yard, facilities and handling equipment to ensure
proper operation is maintained.
Regular sweeping of storage area shall be ensured.
Development of green belt is suggested with native species
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 403
10.3 COMPENSATORY MANGROVE CONSERVATION PLAN
Mangroves are the plant communities occurring in inter-tidal zones along the coasts of tropical and sub-
tropical countries. They are one of the most productive ecosystems. Mangroves represent a rich and
diverse living resource and are valuable to both the economy and protection of coastal environments.
The mangrove ecosystem is dynamic, in both location and composition, and has great resilience with the
ability to restore itself after heavy damage, as long as seed sources and water flow are maintained.
There are also many economic benefits from mangrove resources; like as a source of firewood, self-
replenishing areas of fishery resources.
MANGROVE FORESTS IN ANDHRA PRADESH:
The mangrove forests in Andhra Pradesh are located in the estuaries of the Godavari and the Krishna
rivers. The Godavari mangroves are located in Godavari estuary of East Godavari district and the Krishna
mangroves in Krishna estuary of Krishna and Guntur districts. Small patches were also present along the
coast of Srikakulam, Visakhapatnam,West Godavari, Guntur, Prakasam and Nellore districts.
10.3.1.1 Mangrove forests in Study Area:
Bhavanapadu Mangroves:
The estuarian habitat of Tekkali creek supports dwarf mangroves, marine fauna and wetland birds,
which are considered as an important ecosystem asset for the region. The establishment of mangroves
by the forest department has improved the habitat by attracting fauna to dwell in it.
Mangroves are located along the Tekkali creek starting from Bhavanapadu fishing harbour to Mulapeta
and Naupada spreading around 4 sq km, Forest department is conducting mangrove plantation
programs on regular basis.
Dwarf mangroves dominated by Avicennia marina followed Rhizophora mucronate, Bruguiera cylindrica
and Ceriops decandra. Habitat setup of Mangroves at Tekkali creek are shown in Figure 10.4.
Mangrove patch towards Mulapeta Mangrove patch towards Naupada
Figure 10.4 Mangroves at Tekkali Creek
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 404
10.3.1.2 Mangrove in the port premises:
Small mangrove patches were noticed in the proposed development in the tune of 6.21 acres which
constitute 5.32 acres in the port site near the proposed general cargo storage, 0.23 acres in the
proposed rail corridor and 0.66 acres in the proposed rail corridors.
Following conservation plan is proposed for development of 13 acres of mangroves in the degraded
mangrove patches in the Tekkali creek which will certainly help in safeguarding the mangroves in the
surrounding area.
MANGROVE PLANTATION PROGRAM:
Methodology for Plantation program was adopted from M. S. Swaminathan Research Foundation
Chennai, India by R. Ramasubramanian and T. Ravishankar 2004.
10.3.2.1 Canals Preparation:
Canals were designed like fishbone in order to facilitate easy inflow and outflow of tidal water. The main
canals were dug at an angle of 450 to the natural creek. The side canals were dug at an angle of 300 to
the main canal as shown in Figure 10.5 . Pegs and chalk powder were used for marking the canals.
Figure 10.5 Main canal and side canal preparations
The canal dimensions were determined as per the contour levels and the tidal amplitude of the area
chosen for plantation. The canals were dug in a trapezoidal shape in order to plant the saplings at the
mid-level of the canal. This is to ensure that the plants receive tidal water, but at the same time they are
not submerged.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 405
Figure 10.6: Design for the canal preparations
10.3.2.2 Geomorphology and hydrology:
The levees are formed due to the deposition of silt during floods. The soil subsided in the clear felled
area due to changes in bulk density, making the topography saucer-shaped. As a result, tidal water
entering in during the highest of the high tides stagnates in the saucer shaped area due to the elevation
of the edges. The temperature and the salinity of the stagnant water increases and shoots up to 114 ppt
during summer. This phenomenon prevents natural regeneration of the mangroves and thus enhances
the process of degradation. The area gets flooded only during the monsoon period and cyclones and
storms.
Restoration of the mangroves can be done only when the salinity of the planted area is brought down.
In order to reduce the salinity, fishbone type canals were dug and tidal flushing and draining of stagnant
water was facilitated. This will result in brining the salinity levels to 60 ppt in summer to fresh water
level during monsoon seasons. After a buffer period of three months, the nursery-raised mangrove
saplings were planted along the trapezoid shaped canals in the degraded areas.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 406
Figure 10.7 Cross section of canals with dimensions
10.3.2.3 Species Selection:
Based on the salinity levels of soil, mangrove species namely
Avicennia marina,
Avicennia officinalis and
Excoecaria agallocha
Will be selected for planting in the selected areas. Reason being that these species could tolerate wide
range of salinity. Normally the soil salinity of the degraded area is about 140 ppt during summer. To
reduce the high soil salinity, tidal flushing was facilitated by constructing canals as described in the
previous pages.
Due to this, the soil salts are slowly leached out and the soil salinity is reduced gradually. The reduction
in salinity improved the survival percentage and also reduced the saline stress to the young seedlings.
The planting was done during October and November, after the southwest monsoon. During that period
the rainwater reduces the salinity further. The salinity of the creek water is also low (about 10-15 ppt).
10.3.2.4 Plantations:
The canals were constructed with a depth of 0.7 m to 1.0 m near the bunds of the creeks or the rivers
and 0.45 m inside. The depth of the main canal varied from 0.45 to 1.0 m and the side canals from 0.6 to
0.45 m as per the contour. The top width of the main canal was between 3.5 m and 2 m and the
respective bottom width was between 1 m and 0.4 m The dimensions of the side canals were 2 m top
width, 0.4 m bottom width and 0.45 m depth. The distance between the two side canals was 12.5 m
during the first year of plantation. The planting of mangrove saplings was done 2 m apart along the
canals at about 20 cm down the slope as shown in Figure 10.8.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 407
In the subsequent years, distance between side canals was reduced to 8 m in order to ensure dense
canopy. As the canals were dug closely the dimension of the side canals was reduced accordingly to 1.25
m top width, 0.2 m bottom width and 0.4 m deep.
Figure 10.8 Plantation method
10.3.2.5 De-silting of canals:
The bunds formed by the deposition of the excavated soil during canal digging will silt the canals during
the monsoon seasons. The silted canals have to be de-silted before the onset of summer, because
during summer the tidal amplitude is generally low.
Tidal flushing is very important during summer because the soil salinity will shoot up due to high
temperature and cause damage to the roots of the seedlings. Such seedlings will be replanted in the
following monsoon season.
The survival percentage is measured in the initial period for better monitoring. Initially the growth rate
was slow and after 2 to 3 years the seedling growth rate was faster. The natural regeneration of the
seedlings also occurs simultaneously. After four years, the planted saplings start bearing fruits, which
will regenerate, and the density of the area will increase.
Table 10-7 Budgetary estimates for Mangrove Plantation
S.No. Activity Unit/Item in acres
Amount per unit
Total Amount in INR lakhs
1 Community mobilization- Micro plan preparation and awareness
1
100000
2 Canal digging/ canal construction including machinery and labour
13 140000 18,20,000
3 Nursery raising 13 60000 780000 4 Plantation for first two years 13 50000 650000 5 Desilting for first three years 13 40000 520000 6 Fencing for first two years 13 25000 325000
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 408
S.No. Activity Unit/Item in acres
Amount per unit
Total Amount in INR lakhs
7 Monitoring for first two years 13 23500 305500
Grand Total 45,00,500/-
Roundoff in INR 45,00,000/-
Forty-Five lakhs will be incurred for developing 13 acres of mangroves in the degraded areas of Tekkali
creek @ INR 3,50,000/- per acre.
Benefits:
Ecological and Socio-economic benefits to the local community will be rewarding in the long run
Water regime will be established
Protection from cyclones and floods
10.4 WILDLIFE CONSERVATION PLAN FOR SCHEDULE I SPECIES
BACKGROUND
The IUCN Red List is the world's most comprehensive inventory of the global conservation status of
plant and animal species. It uses a set of criteria to evaluate the extinction risk of thousands of species
and subspecies. These criteria are relevant to all species and all regions of the world. With its strong
scientific base, the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List is recognized as the
most authoritative guide to the status of biological diversity. The Red list of threatened species,
prepared by IUCN has listed 132 species of plants and animals as Critically Endangered (CR), the most
threatened category, from India during its assessment in 2019 Ver-3. Plants seemed to be the most
threatened life form with 60 species being listed as Critically Endangered (CR) and 141 as Endangered
(EN). The Critically Endangered (CR) list included 18 species of amphibians, 14 fishes and 10 mammals.
There are also 15 bird species in the category. The agency listed 310 species as endangered (EN) ones,
including 69 fishes, 38 mammals and 32 amphibians.
Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972, amended on 17thJanuary 2003, is an Act to provide for the protection
of wild animals, birds and plants and for matters connected therewith or ancillary or incidental thereto
with a view to ensuring the ecological and environmental security of the country. Some of the sighted
fauna was given protection by the Indian Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 by including them in different
schedules. During the survey, a total of three (03) Schedule I species including two (02) reptiles and one
(01) avifaunal species were reported in the Bhavanapdu port and its environs (10 km radius).
DECLINE OF WILDLIFE
Biological evolution on earth is associated with extinction of older species and descent of new species
but the disappearance of species from the surface of the earth has speeded up 1000 to 10,000 times as
compared to the natural disappearance, due to destructive activities of man. Important reasons for
decline of wildlife are:
Fragmentation, degradation and loss of habitat
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 409
Hunting and poaching
Man-animal conflict
Pollution
Climate change
Overexploitation
OBJECTIVES OF CONSERVATION PLAN
To prepare the list of flora and fauna of the proposed Bhavanapdu Port and its environs falling
within 10-kilometer radius area from the project site and classification as per schedules of
Wildlife Protection Act, 1972.
To evaluate the ecological sensitivity of the area.
To explore whether the area forms a corridor for any scheduled wildlife.
To locate the Sanctuary, National Park, Bio-sphere reserve, Tiger/ Elephant reserve or notified
Eco- sensitive zones falling in 10-kilometer radius area from the proposed site.
To evaluate the possible threat of wildlife in the area and possible impact of mining on flora
and fauna.
To prepare a comprehensive Conservation Plan for the schedule I faunal species (Table 4.1)
MAMMALS, BIRDS &HERPETOFAUNA OF THE PROJECT AREA (10 KM RADIUS)
(BELONGING TO SCHEDULE I OF WILDLIFE (PROTECTION) ACT, 1972
Table 10-8: List of Schedule I species
S.No. Common Name Scientific name Wildlife Schedule
Reptiles
1. Indian Monitor Lizard Varanus bengalensis Schedule I (Part II)
2. Indian Rock Python Pyhton molurus Schedule I (Part II) Avifauna (Birds)
1. Indian Peafowl Pavo cristatus Schedule I
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 410
CONSERVATION STATUS OF REPTILES
Indian Monitor Lizard (Varanus bengalensis)
Taxonomy
Kingdom Phylum Class Order Family
Animalia Chordata Reptilia Squamata Varanidae
Taxon name: Varanus bengalensis
(Daudin, 1802)
Common name: Bengal Monitor Lizard,
Clouded Monitor, Common Indian
Monitor
Asssessment Information
Red List Category & Criteria: Near
Threatened A2d ver 3.1
Year Published: 2021
Date Assessed: June 8, 2018
Justification
The species is heavily hunted in a variety of habitats across South Asia and continental Southeast Asia.
Extreme local declines have been reported within 30 years (estimated to correspond to three
generations) for most of Southeast Asia outside Malaysia. If the Southeast Asian Varanus nebulosus is
revalidated as a full species, it will consequently likely warrant a Vulnerable or Near Threatened listing,
although Southeast Asian populations of V. bengalensis as presently understood rather reflect a
geographically restricted distribution. More data on rates of any decline in India are needed, the main
part of the global range. It is strongly suspected that local population declines of em style="">V.
bengalensis will increase across the species' global range, and the species appears to be close to
qualifying for a threatened category, and is therefore assessed Near Threatened.
Previously Published Red List Assessments
2010 - Least Concern (LC) https://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2010-4.RLTS.T164579A5909661.en
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 411
Geographic Range
The Indian Monitor Lizard is found throughout Afghanistan, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal, India, Sri
Lanka, Southern China, Myanmar, Viet Nam, Lao PDR, south-eastern Iran and as far as Java and the
Anambas Islands in Indonesia. The Indian Monitor Lizard is naturally absent from the Chao Phraya River
Central Flood Plain in Thailand, a historically swampy area unsuitable for this typically dry forest species.
Country Occurrence: Afghanistan; Bangladesh; Cambodia; China (Yunnan); India (Assam, Gujarat,
Himachal Pradesh, Jammu-Kashmir, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, Tamil Nadu); Indonesia (Jawa); Iran,
Islamic Republic of; Lao People's Democratic Republic; Malaysia; Myanmar; Nepal; Pakistan; Sri Lanka;
Thailand; Viet Nam
Native, Possibly Extant (resident): Indonesia (Sumatera)
Distribution Map
Appearance
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 412
The Indian Monitor Lizard has a white belly striped with dark crossbars and grey or yellow spots
(specifically in the eastern part of the range). The dorsal side of the young monitors has a series of
yellow spots with dark transverse bars connecting them. When these mature, the ground colour turns to
light brown or grey wuth dark spots giving them a speckled appearance.
Habitat and Behavior
The Indian Monitor Lizard is a diurnal species and is mostly terrestrial that inhabits forests and forest
edges along with plantations including oil palm, and agricultural areas. It has been found in a variety of
habitats, both arid and moist, from scrublands to forests, at moderate to high elevations. The Indian
Monitor Lizards is not found inswampy areas. Because the species has a three-year age at maturity and
a maximum lifespan of 20 years, the average age at reproduction might be 11 years.
Bengal monitors are typically solitary and live on the ground, while the young are frequently sighted on
trees. Clouded monitors, on the other hand, are more likely to climb trees. Bengal and yellow monitors
are sympatric, however their habitats are partially divided, as Bengal monitors prefer forest to
agricultural areas. They are normally shy and avoid interacting with humans. They have keen eyesight
and can detect human movement from a distance of approximately 250 metres. When cornered, a few
individuals may bite, but this is uncommon.
Food and Feeding Habits
It feeds on spiders, insects, snails, crabs, frogs, small mammals, birds, lizards and snakes. This particular
species is also known to scavenge. Large adults may climb up vertical tree trunks, stalking and capturing
roosting bats. The species is omnivorous, eating a wide variety of invertebrates and vertebrates. Beetles
and their larvae are the most common invertebrate prey, followed by orthopterans, maggots,
caterpillars, centipedes, scorpions, crabs, crayfish, snails, termites, ants, and earwigs. Larger individuals
eat a lot of vertebrate prey, such as toads and frogs and their eggs, fish, lizards, snakes, rats, squirrels,
hares, musk shrews, and birds, in addition to invertebrates.
Threats in the Study Area
The Indian Monitor Lizard could be primarily threatened by hunting as it is hunted commercially for its ksin (domestically) and its meat is usually eaten. The fat of Indian Monitor Lizard is also used in the making of traditional medicine.
Indian Rock Python (Python molurus)
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 413
Taxonomy
Kingdom Phylum Class Order Family
Animalia Chordata Reptilia Squamata Pythonidae
Taxon name: Python molurus (Linnaeus, 1758)
Common name: Indian Rock Python
Asssessment Information
Red List Category & Criteria: Near Threatened A2d ver 3.1
Year Published: 2021
Date Assessed: September 5, 2019
Justification
Listed as Near Threatened because of population decline (estimated to be close to 30% over the last ten
years) inferred from over-exploitation, habitat destruction, degradation and general apathy.
Geographic Range
The Indian Rock Python is widely found in Sri Lanka and India having subpopulations in North-eastern
Pakistan and Nepal. I t is also found along the India-Bangladesh border.Many Indian sub-populations
have been identified across the country.
Native, Extant (resident): Bangladesh; Bhutan; India (Andhra Pradesh, Arunachal Pradesh, Assam, Bihar,
Chattisgarh, Delhi, Goa, Gujarat, Himachal Pradesh, Jammu-Kashmir, Karnataka, Kerala, Madhya
Pradesh, Meghalaya, Orissa, Punjab, Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu, Uttar Pradesh, Uttaranchal, West Bengal);
Nepal; Pakistan; Sri Lanka
Distribution Map
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 414
Appearance
The Indian rock python's head is small, and its body is stocky. It has labial fossettes and can extend up to
six metres in length; however it is normally not more than four or five. The Indian Rock Python is light
green in colour with large scattered spots on its back. Ab ibverted-Y pattern covers the sides and head
over a pink background. The head has a black pattern that starts at the neck and ends at the nose,
resembling a spear tip. Its tail is prehensile at the end.
Habitat and Behavior
The Indian Rock Python has been reported to be found in forested areas, though it is also found in
mangroves, semi-arid forests and grasslands, streams, marshes and rivers. It can be found in moist rocky
places near streams and pools, huge rotting logs, large burrows, caves, crevices, and old and wrecked
structures. It is a great climber and swimmer. This species may live in a wide variety of environments,
including marshes, swamps, rainforests, rocky terrain, rice fields, riverbanks, and close to tiny villages,
but it must constantly be near a stable source of water.
Food and Feeding Habits
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 415
They are large predators that eat mammals, birds, and reptiles. Large specimens can consume large
animals like wild boar and young deer, although they prefer smaller prey like rat-sized rodents.
Threats in the Study Area
The Indian Rock Python could be primarily threatened due to local market for the illegal demand in
leather industry. Habitat degradation and habitat loss as a result of anthropogenic activities could also
pose a great threat to Indian Rock Python. Mining has been a great threat to this species in the Easten
Ghats of India.
Indian Peafowl (Pavo cristatus)
Taxonomy
Kingdom Phylum Class Order Family
Animalia Chordata Aves Galliformes Phasianidae
Taxon name: Pavo cristatus (Linnaeus, 1758)
Common name: Indian Peafowl, Common
Peafowl, Peafowl
Asssessment Information
Red List Category & Criteria: Least Concern ver
3.1
Year Published: 2016
Date Assessed: October 1, 2016
Justification
This species has an extremely large range, and hence does not approach the thresholds for Vulnerable
under the range size criterion (Extent of Occurrence <20,000 km2 combined with a declining or
fluctuating range size, habitat extent/ quality or population size and a small number of locations or
severe fragmentation). The population trend appears to be stable, and hence the species does not
approach the thresholds for Vulnerable under the population trend criterion (,30% decline over tem
years or three generations). The population size has not been quantified, but it is not believed to
approach the thresholds for Vulnerable under the population size criterion (<10,000 mature indivioduals
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 416
with a continuing decline estimated to be <10% in ten years or three generations or with a specified
population structure). For these reasons the species is evaluated as Least Concern.
Previously Published Red List Assessments
2012 - Least Concern (LC) http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2012-1.RLTS.T22679435A40098247.en
2009 - Least Concern (LC)
2008 - Least Concern (LC)
2004 - Least Concern (LC)
2000 - Lower Risk/least concern (LR/lc)
1994 - Lower Risk/least concern (LR/lc)
1988 - Lower Risk/least concern (LR/lc)
Geographic Range
The Indian sub-continent is the natural habitat of the Indian Peafowl. It is found in good numbers in
Indian Territory ranging from Outer Himalayas through vast stretch of the country including the
Peninsula. It is also found in Pakistan, Nepal and Sri Lanka. The arid deserts of Rajasthan, the riverbanks
of Gujarat and Madhya Pradesh, the foothills of the Himalayas in Uttar Pradesh and the forests of
Haryana – these are considered to be the major and commonly-known habitats of peacocks in India.
Native: Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Nepal, Pakistan, Sri Lanka
Introduced: Australia, Bahamas, New Zealand, and United States (Hawaiian Is.)
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 417
Distribution Map
Appearance
The Indian peacock has iridescent blue and green plumage. The peacock "tail", known as a "train",
consists not of tail quill feathers, but highly elongated upper tail coverts. These feathers are marked with
eyespots, best seen when a peacock fans his tail. Both sexes of all species have a crest atop the head.
The Indian peahen has a mixture of dull grey, brown, and green in her plumage. The female also displays
her plumage to ward off female competition or signal danger to her young. Male peacock has a
spectacular glossy green long tail feathers that may be more than 60 percent of the bird’s total body
length. These feathers have blue, golden green and copper colored ocelli (eyes). The long tail feathers
are used for making rituals like court ship displays. The feathers are arched in to a magnificent fan
shaped for macros the back of the bird and almost touching the found on both sides. Females do not
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 418
have these graceful tail feathers. They have the fan like crest with whitish face and throat, chest nut
brown crown and hind neck, metallic green upper breast and mantle, white belly and brown back rump
and tail. Their primaries are dark brown.
Habitat and Behavior
The scrub jungles and forest edges are the natural habitat of this bird; has affinity towards moist & dry
deciduous and semiarid biomes. It is also found along streams with good vegetation and in agricultural
fields and in close proximity with the human settlements. Habitat mosaic of scrub and open areas with
ample sites for “dust bathing” and “lekking”. Dust bathing is critical as this bird has to condition its
feathers and remove feather-degrading bacteria and other external parasites. The peafowl are forest
birds that nest on the ground. The peafowl are terrestrial feeders but roost in trees. It has got a loud
scream that can scary many enemies. The life expectancy is about 10-15 years.
Food and Feeding Habits
Peafowls are omnivores, eating plant parts, flower petals, seed heads, insects and other arthropods,
reptiles and amphibians. In the study area at some places, dense tree canopy cover supports good insect
diversity which is very common food for peafowls.
Threats in the Study Area
The Indian Peafowl could be primaly threatened by activities such as hunting or poaching due to culture
and mythology reasons. Adult peafowl can usually escape ground predators by flying into trees.
o For aging in groups provides some safety as there are more eyes to look out for predators.
o Habitat loss, specially the shortage of tall trees in and around the villages for roosting and for
providing shade during hot summer months.
o Shortage of drinking water for the birds during the hot summer days.
o Casualties caused by eating chemically treated agricultural crop seeds.
o Illegal hunting by some communities.
CONSERVATION ACTION PLAN
The main objective is to make sure that their habitats will be preserved so that the future generations
of both wildlife and human can enjoy it. To conserve wildlife awareness must be created among the
people about its importance and involvement of local people is must in the wildlife protection.
Following action plan and financial projection has been proposed for implementation of the
conservation plan in the project area.
10.4.6.1 SPECIAL STAFF FOR THE PROTECTION AND ANTI-POACHING
Special Staffs will be deployed by the forest department for patrolling and protection of the fauna and
flora under their jurisdiction because the regular staff deployed for this purpose, due to their busy
schedule, is unable to perform their work properly. Each of the special staff will be equipped with dress,
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 419
raincoat, gumboots, sticks and wireless set for communication. Financial burden for the same has been
included in financial projection of this report.
10.4.6.2 REDUCING MAN WILDLIFE CONFLICTS
Unauthorized entry into forest for illegal grazing, cutting or poaching are the major causes for Man-
Wildlife conflicts. These practices will be reduced as much as possible.
10.4.6.3 PROTECTION AND DEVELOPMENT OF HABITAT
Activities which may damage the habitat will be kept on watch.
10.4.6.4 CREATING SMALL WATER HOLE/ KHELIS
Location of water holes will be suggested by the local forest department in consultation with the Gram
Panchayat (Sarpanch).
10.4.6.5 CREATION OF DRINKING WATER FACILITY
Water is the most important factors to all birds and animals. During drier season water availability in
forest is limited, hence to provide water safely places suitable for mini watersheds will be identified in
the core as well as in the buffer zone to store rainwater, so that water available throughout the year.
10.4.6.6 CONSERVING AND RESTORING OF FOREST AREA WATER BODIES
Promote traditional techniques and practices for conserving ponds and other sources of water in the
forest area.
10.4.6.7 PROVISION FOR ENVIRONMENT RESTORATION
Ensure provision for environmental restoration during commissioning and after decommissioning of
project.
HABITAT IMPROVEMENT ACTION PLAN
Habitat improvement programme will be under taken in the study area for shelter of the wild animals.
This will be achieved by plantation of local varieties of the tree species near villages in study area.
Plantation will also be carried in some forest patches identified by local forest department.
Habitat improvement programme will include plantation of native species adaptable for the region, In
order to improve vegetation cover, it is suggested to carry out extensive afforestation program different
phases. These species will help to provide habitat for faunal species, and also increase the species
diversity and maintain the naturalness of the surrounding area.
SEED/ SAPLINGS DISTRIBUTION AMONG THE VILLAGERS
During this habitat improvement programme the seeds and Saplings of indigenous fruit trees/plants will
be distributed in the various villages of the study area. Compost packets will be also provided at the
intervals of every six months by the proponent (in consultation of forest department).
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 420
TRAINING AND AWARENESS PROGRAMME
This is the most important aspect of wildlife conservation. People will be educated regarding the
importance of wildlife conservation through mass publicity by installing sign boards, conducting audio
visual classes and distributing literature in respective villages in the Study area. Experts in the field of
wildlife conservation will also be invited to deliver talks through slides.
PROMOTION OF RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES
To reduce the dependence on forests for fuelwood, promotion and distribution of renewable energy
sources such as solar power cookers, biogas etc. will be promoted and distributed in the villages
affected by the project activities.
FOREST FIRE PROTECTION MEASURES
Forest fire protection measures for early detection, control and management of forest fire during the
fire season in the project affected villages shall be carried out.
PROCUREMENT OF EQUIPMENT’S
Various wildlife researches and monitoring equipment’s such as as Nets, tranquilizers and cage will be
procured for proper rescue and translocation of wildlife during emergency situation.
Signboards: Sign-board strobe displayed
Wildlife has right to move through roads
Reptiles crossing; drive slowly
Plant tree saplings with your name
Fire destroys both the plants and animals
Capturing/ hunting wild animals is punishable offence
Don’t throw burning objects
Wildlife is our precious heritage
Inform forest officer if wildlife is in distress
MONITORING PLAN
Wildlife monitoring or estimation is a very important aspect for management of a Protected Area. It
becomes more relevant and important, especially for a newly constituted Protected Area and the
Landscape, where very less data is available on this subject. On account of above facts, a two-stage/
layer monitoring protocol is proposed for estimation of Wildlife in the Project study area; is mentioned
as below:
i. Protocol based on monitoring of Scheduled Species under Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 using
Daily/ Range level/ Long term Patrols.
ii. Monitoring for Vegetation & RET Species
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 421
10.4.13.1 Protocol based monitoring of Scheduled Species under Wildlife (Protection) Act,
1972 using Daily/ Range level/ Long term Patrols.
Daily, range level and long-range patrolling are important source for getting information of presence or
absence of different wild animals in different areas of project area and other parts of forest division.
Each patrolling team should use a GPS unit and a digital camera. Date, time and GPS coordinates of
beginning of patrol should be recorded. Preferably the GPS unit shall be switched on throughout the
patrol in a track log mode. The mode of patrol is also recorded, e.g., on foot, bicycle, motorcycle, vehicle
etc. Signs and sightings of all Scheduled species while on patrol is recorded by entering the GPS
coordinate, date and time of the sighting/sign as well as recording a digital picture of the same if
possible.
Format for recording the Schedule Species presence
Date --------------- Time --------------- Range------------Beat ------------
GPS Coordinate:--------------- Division Name-------------
Put tick (√) marks in appropriate column
S.no.
1. Habitat Type note the habitat type
2. Male Tracks recorded Not recorded
3. Female Tracks recorded Not recorded
4. Cubs/Eggs Tracks recorded Not recorded
5. Other Carnivore Tracks Present Not present
FOREST FIRE PROTECTION MEASURESMONITORING OF VEGETATION AND RET
SPECIES
Line transact method shall be used monitoring of Vegetation and RET Species in the respective forest
beats under the Forest Ranges and Divisions. Sampling for Vegetation and RET species and any impact
due to human disturbance etc. will be done only once on a transect.
Forest beat will be the sampling unit, and sampling will be done along the established line
transect.
The beginning and end point coordinates of the line transect need to be recorded using a GPS
unit.
Vegetation would need to be sampled every 400 m along the transect.
The vegetation would need to be quantified visually at the following categories for each plot:
A. 15 m. radius circular plots:
Within a distance of approximately 15 m of the observer the five most dominant trees (over-
story, all vegetation >6 fit height, including bamboo) need to be listed in the order of
dominance (abundance)
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 422
The observer needs to list the 5 most dominant shrub species (middle story, vegetation >40 cm
and <6fit) in order of dominance (abundance) within 15m of the location. He needs to
categorize shrub density (under-story vegetation) as absent, very low (25%), low (50%),
medium (75%), and dense (100%). Shrubs will be assessed on five-point scale (0 to 4 i.e., absent
to most abundant) for density estimation.
If weeds are present, their abundance needs to be scored on 0 to 4 scale (0 being absent and 4
high abundance) and the three most common weeds seen in 15 m need to be listed in order of
abundance.
Within the same 15 m distance the observer needs to record number of signs of looping, wood
cutting and presence/absence of human foot trail. Mention needs to be made if people and or
livestock are seen from the plot.
The observer needs to visually quantify the canopy cover at the location. The observer should
subjectively classify the proportion of the sky above him that is covered by canopy foliage and
categorize it into <0.1,0.1 -0.2,0.2-0.4,0.4-0.6,0.6- 0.8, >0.8 canopy cover.
A mention needs to be made in the data sheet regarding the number of permanent human
settlements, human population, and livestock population present in the beat (to the best of his
knowledge).
A mention needs to be made based on the observers’ knowledge if any non-timber forest
product is collected from the beat. If yes, which NTFP and to score the magnitude of collection
on a 4-point scale (0- no collection 4-high rate of collection).
If the beat was burnt (natural or management practice), the proportion burnt in the past 3
years need to be mention in the datasheet.
Data Sheet-3A VEGETATION (15m plot)
Name of Observer:……… Date:……… Forest Circle: ………… Forest Division…………
Range:…………………… Beat:……… ID No. of Line Transect: ................…………
Plot No.
Can
op
yCo
ver(
0-
1)
Tree Species (Descending Order of dominance, all veg. >6fit)
Shrub Species (Descending Order of dominance, all veg. >20cm &<6fit)
Shrub Abundance 0 to 4 0-absent to 4- very high
Weed/invasive Species (Descending Order-of dominance)
Bro
ad
vege
tati
on
& t
err
ain
for
the
plo
t
1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3
* Bamboo more than 2 m., should be entered in "tree" category, less than 2m in "shrub" category.
Data Sheet-3B Human Disturbance
Name of Observer: ………Date: …………Forest Circle: ………………Forest Division…………
Range: ……………………… Beat: …………ID No. of Line Transect: ………………………
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 423
Plot No.
Human Disturbances 0-4 Rating, 0-No, 4-Very high
Wood Cutting
0-4
Lopping 0-4
Grass/ Bamboo
cutting 0-4
Presence of human/ livestock/trail 0-4
Weed Abundance
0-4
People Seen Y/N
Livestock Seen Y/N
Are there any permanent human settlements in the beat? (Yes/No).
If Yes, how many?_ Approximate human population_____,approximate livestock population______
Cattle____ Goat/Sheep_____Other Livestock
Is there NTFP collection in the beat ________________ Yes/No.? If yes, what NTFP is collected? __
Rate NTFP collection on a scale of 0-4, 0-No to 4-Very high_______________________________
The proportion of the beat that was burnt during the past year was_____ secondyear was____third
year was_____1 m radius circular plot
B. 1 m. radius circular plots:
This plot should be laid 5m away from the center of the 15m circular plat. The observer needs to use a
2m long stick to define an imaginary circle around him with the stick as the diameter. Within this circular
plot (2m diameter) the observer needs to a) quantify the percent ground cover, i.e. the proportion of
the ground covered by herbs, grasses, litter, and bare ground, b) List the 3 most dominant grass species,
and herb species in order of dominance.
Recording Ground Cover in 1 m radius plot
Name of Observer: ………Date: …………Forest Circle: ………………Forest Division…………
Range: ……………………… Beat: …………ID No. of Line Transect: ………………………
Plot No.
Dry leaf
litter %
Ground Cover (The total percentage of following 5 columns should be
100%)
Grass Species
(Report in descending
order of numbers)
Herb Species (Report in
descending order of
numbers) R
em
arks
Dry Grass
%
Green Grass
%
Herb (Small
Plants) %
Weeds %
Bare Ground %
1 2 3 1 2 3
10.1.2 BUDGETARY FOR CONSERVATION PLAN
The proponent as proposed a sum of Rs 70.50 Lakhs for the wildlife conservation plan under the
following heads in consultation of local forest department. Below tables give the details of budget.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 424
Table 10-9: Budgetary allocation for conservation Plan
Year Activities
Budget to be
allocated (INR)
in Lakhs
1st Year
Organizing Wild Life Awareness Programmes for conservation of wildlife and awareness of local people and students 0.25
Establishment of trained teams 0.5
Purchase of equipment’s such as Nets, tranquillizers equipment’s and Cages etc. for proper rescue and translocation of wild animals 0.5
Training the Emergency Response Team 1.25
Fund for necessary equipment’s for Emergency Response Team at District Forest Department level. 1.5
Survey, site identification, Construction of Water holes ( Small water ponds) & Rainwater harvesting pits in the study area and environs
1.5
Identification of natural habitats (forests, pastures, grasslands etc.) for Conservation measures 1
Promotion & Distribution of Alternative Energy Sources such as Solar Power, Biogas in the Project Affected Villages 0.5
Forest Fire Protection Measures 1
Installation of submersible water pumps for water supply 1
Telineelapuram bird Nest Area
Artificial trees for nesting
Nylon nets for protecting chicks
5
Plantation of suitable fruit & flower bearing plant species in the Study area so that the wild herbivores animals can reside within the forest.
1
SUBTOTAL 15
2nd Year
Organising Wild Life Awareness Programmes for conservation of wildlife and awareness of local people and students 0.25
Construction of Den for wildlife 0.75
Conservation programmes for natural habitats (forests, pastures/grasslands etc.) for Conservation measures 0.5
Construction of water Khelis/ Water holes, artificial ponds & rainwater harvesting pits etc. 0.5
Installation of submersible water pumps. 0.5
Promotion & Distribution of Alternative Energy Sources such as Solar Power, Biogas in the Project Affected Villages 1.25
Maintenance of tree groves, Dens bushy structure and roosting and nesting sites. 0.75
Forest Fire Protection Measures 0.75
Procure car (4-wheeler) for monitoring and safeguard process of forest conservation 1.5
Plantation of suitable fruit & flower bearing plant species in the Study area so that the wild herbivores animals can reside within the forest.
0.75
Telineelapuram bird Nest Area 5.0
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 425
Year Activities
Budget to be
allocated (INR)
in Lakhs
Artificial trees for nesting near water bodies
Nylon nets for protecting chicks
SUBTOTAL 12.5
3rd Year
Organising Wild Life Awareness Programmes for conservation of wildlife and awareness of local people and students 1
Completion of Construction of water Khelis/ Water holes, artificial ponds & Rainwater Harvesting Pits etc. 1
Completion of Construction of Den for Wildlife 0.5
Conservation programmes for natural habitats (forests, pastures/grasslands etc.) for Conservation measures 0.25
Maintenance & Repair of submersible water pumps. 0.25
Promotion & Distribution of Alternative Energy Sources such as Solar Power, Biogas in the Project Affected Villages 0.25
Maintenance of tree grooves, Dens bushy structure and roosting and nesting sites. 0.25
Forest Fire Protection Measures 0.5
Procure car (4-wheeler) for monitoring and safeguard process of forest conservation 1
Telineelapuram bird Nest Area
Financial aid to forest department
2.5
SUBTOTAL 7.5
4th Year Plantation of suitable fruit & flower bearing plant species in the Study area so that the wild herbivores animals can reside within the forest.
1.25
Conservation programmes for natural habitats (forests, pastures/grasslands etc.) for Conservation measures 1.25
Maintenance & Repair of submersible water pumps. 0.5
Maintenance of tree groves, Dens, bushy structure and roosting and nesting sites. 0.5
Promotion & Distribution of Alternative Energy Sources such as Solar Power, Biogas in the Project Affected Villages 0.5
Organizing wild life awareness programmes for conservation of wildlife and awareness of local people and students 0.5
Forest Fire Protection Measures 0.5
Telineelapuram bird Nest Area
Financial aid to forest department
2.5
SUBTOTAL 7.5
5th Year Maintenance of planted species 1.25
Organizing wild life awareness programmes for conservation of wildlife and awareness of local people and students 1.25
Plantation of suitable species in the buffer area so that the wild herbivores animals can reside within the forest. 0.5
Conservation programmes for natural habitats (forests, pastures/grasslands etc.) for Conservation measures 0.5
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 426
Year Activities
Budget to be
allocated (INR)
in Lakhs
Promotion & Distribution of Alternative Energy Sources such as Solar Power, Biogas in the Project Affected Villages 0.5
Maintenance & Repair of submersible water pumps. 0.5
Maintenance of tree groves, Dens, bushy structure and roosting and nesting sites. 0.25
Forest Fire Protection Measures 0.25
Telineelapuram bird Nest Area
Financial aid to forest department 2.5
SUBTOTAL 7.5
6th Year Periodic monitoring, Maintenance of water hole, dens, roosting sites, breeding ground of species. 0.5
Monitoring & Evaluation and Maintenance program for planted species. 0.5
Management for natural habitats (forests, pastures/grasslands etc.) for Conservation measures 0.5
Promotion & Distribution of Alternative Energy Sources such as Solar Power, Biogas in the Project Affected Villages 0.25
Maintenance of permanent and durable wildlife shed. 0.25
Forest Fire Protection Measures 0.25
Organising Wild Life Awareness Programmes for conservation of Wildlife and awareness of local people and students. 0.25
SUBTOTAL 2.5
7th Year Periodic monitoring, Maintenance of water hole, dens, roosting sites, breeding ground of species. 0.5
Monitoring & Evaluation and Maintenance program for planted species. 0.5
Management for natural habitats (forests, pastures/grasslands etc.) for Conservation measures 0.5
Promotion & Distribution of Alternative Energy Sources such as Solar Power, Biogas in the Project Affected Villages 0.25
Maintenance of permanent and durable wildlife shed. 0.25
Forest Fire Protection Measures 0.25
Organising Wild Life Awareness Programmes for conservation of Wildlife and awareness of local people and students. 0.25
SUBTOTAL 2.5
8th Year Maintenance of permanent and durable wildlife shed. 1.25
Organising Wild Life Awareness Programmes for conservation of Wildlife and awareness of local people and students. 0.25
Management for natural habitats (forests, pastures/grasslands etc.) for Conservation measures 0.25
Promotion & Distribution of Alternative Energy Sources such as Solar Power, Biogas in the Project Affected Villages 0.25
Monitoring & Evaluation and Maintenance program for planted species. 0.25
Forest Fire Protection Measures 0.25
SUBTOTAL 2.5
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 427
Year Activities
Budget to be
allocated (INR)
in Lakhs
9th Year Maintenance of permanent and durable wildlife shed. 1
Organising Wild Life Awareness Programmes for conservation of Wildlife and awareness of local people and students. 0.5
Management for natural habitats (forests, pastures/grasslands etc.) for Conservation measures 0.25
Promotion & Distribution of Alternative Energy Sources such as Solar Power, Biogas in the Project Affected Villages 0.25
Monitoring & Evaluation and Maintenance program for planted species. 0.25
Forest Fire Protection Measures 0.25
SUBTOTAL 2.5
10th Year Maintenance of permanent and durable wildlife shed. 1
Organising Wild Life Awareness Programmes for conservation of Wildlife and awareness of local people and students. 0.5
Management for natural habitats (forests, pastures/grasslands etc.) for Conservation measures 0.25
Promotion & Distribution of Alternative Energy Sources such as Solar Power, Biogas in the Project Affected Villages 0.25
Monitoring & Evaluation and Maintenance program for planted species. 0.25
Forest Fire Protection Measures 0.25
SUBTOTAL 2.5
Additional measures for Wildlife Conservation
Development of Wildlife conservation and protection centre with consultation to state Forest Department for research and further conservation
3
Development of Huts/Watch towers around the forest area for Forest conservation & Eco-tourism 5
GRAND TOTAL 70.5
Table 10-10: Year wise fund to be submitted by the user agency to State Forest Department, AP
Year 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Additional Support Total
Provision in Lakhs 15 12.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 8 70.5
Provision in % 21% 18% 11% 11% 11% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 11% 100%
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 428
10.1.3 CONCLUSION
Any developmental projects invariably involve the alteration of environmental conditions of a particular
geographical area. As a result, these projects impose some pressure on the social, physical and biological
components/structure of the project area that can affect the surrounding environment adversely. The
area with such developmental projects in place may have an important effect on the subsequent
environmental impacts. These impacts need to be assessed before the setting up of the projects.
Therefore, such developmental activities should be carried out in harmony with the carrying capacity of
nature and through judicious planning.
Large-scale development projects alter the natural surrounding and hence impact on ecosystem and its
components i.e. flora and fauna, is obvious. Before implementing such projects, it is vital to understand
the baseline status of floral and faunal diversity. The baseline data helps to design project in such a way
that any harmful impacts on the vegetation and fauna can be avoided. It also provides an insight to
mitigate plans to reorganize adverse impact on the natural surroundings.
The Baseline study for the existing ecological environment was carried out in a phased and constructive
manner. Collection and generation of ecological data has been completed at two levels: Field Studies
and Secondary data sources. Team of ecology experts visited the site during October to December 2020
(Post-Monsoon Season).
During the survey, a total of three (03) Schedule I species including two (02) reptiles and one (01)
avifaunal species were reported in the 10 km radius of port site.
For the conservation of wildlife in the Tekkali Forest Division; financial allocation of INR 70.50 Lakhs has
been made to fulfill the planned activities.
10.1.4 FURTHER SUGGESTIONS
Stopping the increased vehicle pollution, wildlife road fatalities and damage to precious habitat
by peoples to start movement towards these areas.
To carry annual census research projects to ecology and habitat use by peacock.
By making provision of veterinary care and cages for injured or sick deformed birds.
The prolific use of insecticides / pesticides should be checked as these harmful chemicals are
detrimental and instrumental for killing of insects / butterflies which are natural prey for the
birds.
Declare the animal as economically valuable
Enact stricter laws to control the capture or exploitation of females of any endangered species
and enforce them.
Forest Officials should have frequent coordination with the local inhabitants for checking any
poaching/illegal tree felling
Budget for the Biodiversity Plan is considered in the Environmental Management Plan.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 429
10.5 SHORELINE MONITORING PROGRAM
The proposed port requires offshore structures such as north and south breakwaters.
Construction of breakwaters perpendicular to the shore affects the littoral drift taking place at the
project location. Thus, in order to check the impact on the littoral drift, shoreline monitoring must be
carried out. Shoreline monitoring must be carried out both by GIS and manual onsite coastal mapping.
These activities must be accomplished twice a year during fair weather and immediately after monsoon
season. This gives better understanding of the proposed project’s reliability during monsoon season.
Also, erosion at the leeward side of the breakwater if occurred can be rectified immediately. The
shoreline monitoring may be carried out for 5 km on either side of the coastal stretch proposed for
shore protection measures. Coastal mapping comprises of mapping High Tide Line (HTL) and Low Tide
Line (LTL) will give better understand of accretion and erosion over a period of time.
In case of shoreline erosion is noticed beach nourishment must be carried out with dredge spoil.
However, in the event of extreme erosion on the northern side of north breakwater, 10 nos. of short
groynes as protection measure will be proposed at north of the second north breakwater.
RAIN WATER HARVESTING
Land terrain of the port has to be planned in such a way that Rain Water flows down to the RCC
constructed Rain Water storage pond. Water will enter into the storage pond through filter bed. Filter
bed will be made with different size of gravels and core sand. The filtrate will be stored in the pond,
which will be used for industrial / firefighting purposes as well as for other non-critical purposes. The
residue of the filter bed will be removed manually from time to time.
STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
The effectiveness of the drainage system depends on proper cleaning of all drainage pipes/channels.
Regular checking will be done to see that none of the drains are clogged due to accumulation of
sludge/sediments. The clogged drains will be cleaned as soon as possible, preferably the same day. The
catch-pits linked to the storm water drainage system from the raw material handling areas will be
regularly checked and cleaned to ensure their effectiveness. This checking and cleaning will be rigorous
during the monsoon season, especially at the time of heavy rains forecast.
10.6 IMPLEMENTATION OF EMP
CONSTITUTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CELL
Various control measures have been suggested in the EMP for environmental protection. It is suggested
that the Bhavanapadu port should maintain a full-fledged Environmental Management Cell (EMC)
reporting to the top management through the Environment Division. The EMC will closely monitor the
environment aspects of the proposed project and identity problems and accordingly, suggest certain
measures to mitigate the same. In addition it will also all the statutory requirements in the area of
environmental protection.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 430
EMP BUDGET
Budgetary estimates for effective EMP is shown in Table 10-11 and Table 10-12 for construction and
operation phase.
Table 10-11 Environmental Management Plan during Construction Phase Sr.No Components Parameters Total
Cost Capital
Cost Recurring
Cost (Annual)
Total Recurring
Cost
(Rs Lakhs)
(Rs Lakhs)
(Rs Lakhs) (Rs Lakhs)
1 Environment Monitoring Plan for Air, Noise, Water, Soil, marine etc. Outsourced to NABL/ MoEF&CC accredited laboratory (detail in chapter 6)
All parameters for Ambient Air Monitoring , noise , water , soil , acquatic , Marine
162.6 27.5 45.0 135.1
1.1 Work Place Air Monitoring PM10, PM2.5, SO2, NO2, VOCs & Fugitive Emissions
16.2 0.0 5.4 16.2
1.2 DG Set Monitoring TPM, SO2, NOx 5.4 0.0 1.8 5.4
2 Noise Environment Installation of acoustic enclosure, vibrational pads for DG set
1.7 1.7 0.0 0.0
3 STP STP Installation 176.7 176.7 0.0 0.0
4 Solid and Liquid waste Management Waste Management (MARPOL waste reception Facility)
HW , MSW , E-waste Paper & plastic waste management & sicentific disposal facility, Oil & Silt Interceptor
823.8 823.8 0.0 0.0
Waste transportation
Setting up of Waste Reception Faciility under MARPOL
5 Strom Water Harvesting and Management
Cement Concrete pipes (with collar joints) ,Spun Concrete pipes (RCC & PSC), with S/S joints ,Stone work ,Masonry. Design & installation of drainage system
188.8 188.8 0.0 0.0
5.1 Sewage (untreated &treated)
pH, COD, BOD, TSS, TDS, Oil & Grease
3.6 0.0 1.2 3.6
6 Green Belt Development Green Belt/Area Development (Purchase of Plants , soil , fertilizers , bricks) , fencing, transportation , digging of pits
340.91 340.91
Maintenance of Green belt/area (Caretaker / watering to plants)
7 Occupational Health Glares, Breathing Masks, 27.0 0.0 9.0 27.0
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 431
Sr.No Components Parameters Total Cost
Capital Cost
Recurring Cost
(Annual)
Total Recurring
Cost
(Rs Lakhs)
(Rs Lakhs)
(Rs Lakhs) (Rs Lakhs)
Safety and firefighting networks
Gloves, Boots, Helmets, Safety Belt, Safety Ladder, Self-contained suit, Ear Plugs, SCBA etc.
Annual health- medical check-up of workers ®
Medical Insurance to employees
8 Conservation Management Plan
- 35.00 35.0 0.0 0.0
9 Mangrove Management Plan
Mangrove management for External Connectivity
17.8 15.8 0.7 2.0
Total Cost in Lakh 1799.3 1610.0 63.1 189.3
A total capital cost of 1610.0 lakhs, Annual recurring cost of 63.1 lakhs per year and Total recurring cost
for 30 years is 189.3 lakhs for construction phase as EMP budget is estimated.
Table 10-12 Environmental Management Plan during Operation Phase
Sr.No Components Parameters Total Cost
Capital Cost
Recurring Cost
(Annual)
Total Recurring
Cost
(Rs Lakhs)
(Rs Lakhs)
(Rs Lakhs)
(Rs Lakhs)
1 Environment Monitoring Plan for Air, Noise, Water, Soil, marine etc. Outsourced to NABL/ MoEF&CC accredited laboratory (detail in chapter 6)
All parameters for Ambient Air Monitoring , noise , water , soil , acquatic , Marine
1368.0 0.0 45.6 1368.0
1.1 Work Place Air Monitoring
PM10, PM2.5, SO2, NO2 , VOCs & Fugitive Emissions
162.0 0.0 5.4 162.0
1.2 DG Set Monitoring TPM, SO2, NOx 54.0 0.0 1.8 54.0
2 Noise Environment Installation of acoustic enclosure, vibrational pads for DG set
5.0 0.0 0.2
5.0
3 STP 795.2 0.0 26.5 795.2
4 Solid and Liquid waste Mannagement Waste Management (MARPOL waste reception Facility)
HW , MSW , E-waste Paper & plastic waste management & sicentific disposal facility, Oil & Silt Interceptor
6511.0 0.0 217.0 6511.0
Waste transportation
Operating Waste Reception
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 432
Sr.No Components Parameters Total Cost
Capital Cost
Recurring Cost
(Annual)
Total Recurring
Cost
(Rs Lakhs)
(Rs Lakhs)
(Rs Lakhs)
(Rs Lakhs)
Faciility under MARPOL
5 Strom Water Harvesting and Management
Cement Concrete pipes (with collar joints) ,Spun Concrete pipes (RCC & PSC), with S/S joints ,Stone work ,Masonry. Design & installation of drainage system
566.3 0.0 18.9 566.3
5.1 Sewage (Untreated & Tretaed)
pH, COD, BOD, TSS, TDS, Oil & Grease
5.4 0.0 0.2 5.4
6 Green Belt Development Green Belt/Area Development (Purchase of Plants , soil , fertilizers , bricks) , fencing, transportation , digging of pits Maintenance of Green belt/area (Caretaker / watering to plants)
65.2 0.0 13.0 65.2
7 Occupational Health Safety and firefighting networks
Glares, Breathing Masks, Gloves, Boots, Helmets, Safety Belt, Safety Ladder, Self-contained suit, Ear Plugs, SCBA etc.
150.0 0.0 5.0 150.0
Annual health- medical check-up of workers (R)
900.0 0.0 30.0 900.0
Medical Insurance to employees
750.0 0.0 25.0 750.0
8 Local Area Development Plan (LADP)
Plan for PAP's and nearby Community
1546.0 386.5 38.6 1159.5
9 Public Hearing Community Benefit 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
10 Conservation Management Plan
35.5 0.0 7.1 35.5
11 Forest Diversion NPV & Compensatory Afforestation Cost
17.4 17.4 0.0 0.0
12 Mangrove Management Plan
Mangrove management for External Connectivity
47.3 0.0 1.6 47.3
13 Shoreline Changes 10.0 300.0
14 Solar Panel On-grid solar power system of capacity (3.5 to 4.5 MW)
152.8
Total Cost in Lakh 13015.0 556.7 453.3 12911.1
A total capital cost of 556.7 lakhs, Annual recurring cost of 453.3 lakhs per year and Total recurring cost
for 30 years is 12911.1 lakhs for operation phase as EMP budget is estimated.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 433
CHAPTER 11
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 434
11 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION
11.1 INTRODUCTION
Andhra Pradesh was amongst the first maritime states to recognize the imperative need for increased
port infrastructure. Government of Andhra Pradesh (GoAP) has prepared a perspective development of
ports for development of ports and port related activities all along coastal belt. The State has Fifteen
(15) notified non-major ports and one (1) major port (Visakhapatnam) along its 974 km coastline.
Andhra Pradesh was amongst the first maritime states to recognize the imperative need for increased
modernized port infrastructure and the role that private sector would be required to play in developing
the same. Andhra Pradesh has prepared a perspective development plan of ports according to which a
cargo of 100 MMTPA and 300 MMTPA would be handled by 2019-2020 and 2020-21 respectively.
As part of its endeavor in the development of port infrastructure, Andhra Pradesh Maritime Board
(APMB) proposed to undertake development of Greenfield port at Bhavanapadu in Srikakulam District,
Andhra Pradesh. GoAP has issued port limits vide G. O. Ms. No. 545 of T, R&B Transport, Roads and
Buildings (P.I.) Department, Dt. 02nd July, 1979. However, since the port limits are fixed in 1979,
considering the present requirement and phase wise development, Director of Ports/APMB requested
Government of Andhra Pradesh to extend the port limits.
As per the list of projects or activities requiring prior Environmental Clearance given in the EIA
Notification issued by MoEF&CC on 14th September 2006, proposed project is listed in schedule 7(e) i.e.,
Ports and Harbours and requires Environmental Clearance from MoEF&CC. Also the project attracts CRZ
notification, 2011 and 2019 and require CRZ clearance through Andhra Pradesh Coastal Zone
Management Authority (APCZMA).
The Phase I development of Bhavanapadu port is proposed to handle ~23.53 Million Tonnes per Annum
(MTPA) of various types of cargo falls under Category A and shall obtain Environmental and CRZ
Clearance from MoEF&CC.
The Phase II is 83.3 Million Tonnes per Annum (MTPA).
11.2 LOCATION, NATURE AND SIZE OF PROJECT
Location of project: Proposed site for port development is located at Bhavanapadu village, located at
latitude of 18°35’ N; longitude of 84°26'E, Santhabommali mandal, Srikakulam district, Andhra Pradesh.
The port location is about 85 nautical miles of north east of Visakhapatnam Port. Port location is shown
in Figure 1.3 and Port site photographs is given in Figure 1.4.
Nature of project: The nature of the project is the development of Greenfield Non-major port at
Bhavanapadu
Size of project: As per the Master plan, the port will be developed in the overall area of 3160 acres
spanning over two phases of development, i.e., 1010 acres during Phase I and 2150 acres in Phase II.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 435
11.3 COASTAL REGULATION ZONE
National Centre for Sustainable Coastal Management (NCSCM), Anna University has been entrusted for
demarcation of HTL, LTL and CRZ areas in and around the proposed port site. Proposed port location
does not contain environmentally sensitive areas such as National parks / marine parks, sanctuaries,
wildlife habitats, corals / coral reefs. It also does not include breeding and spawning grounds of fish and
other marine life, area of outstanding natural beauty / historically / heritage area, area rich in genetic
diversity.
As per the classification of CRZ notification 2011, the proposed development falls under:
CRZ I A : Ecologically Sensitive Areas (Sand dunes)
11.4 NEED OF THE PROJECT
The competitive ports for Bhavanapadu are Visakhapatnam and Gangavaram on the south along Andhra
Pradesh coastline and Gopalpur and Paradip on the north along Odisha coastline. Potential cargo
competition from Paradip port can be for the cargo generated through Central Chhattisgarh region and
Central Odisha. These areas do not fall in any mineral rich cluster of the states. The upcoming power
plants, graphite and alumina deposits can act as cargo demand centres for Bhavanapadu port.
Vishakhapatnam bound cargo emanating from Northern Odisha mines can be captured by upcoming
Gopalpur port and newly proposed Bhavanapadu. Further, the possibility diversion of cargo from
Southern Odisha and South Chhattisgarh is more to Bhavanapadu port because of its proximity, when
compared to Vishakhapatnam port. The containerization level of the hinterland is lower than the
country average. And the ports on the east coast do have capacity problems. For Bhavanapadu there are
great opportunities in this market. Due to economic growth break bulk has an increasing market and
gives opportunities to Bhavanapadu. Iron ore and fertilizer are industries which show a growth in the
whole area. The direct hinterland of Bhavanapadu has several producers and customers for these
products. Alumina and other minerals are expecting to have a large growth, and are closer to the
Bhavanapadu port then the existing ports; this also means a good opportunity for Bhavanapadu
The classification of districts near Bhavanapadu into primary, secondary and tertiary hinterland is done
as per the logistical advantages offered by Bhavanapadu port as well as the proximity with other
competing ports in the region.
The primary hinterland of Bhavanapadu covers Vizianagaram District and Srikakulam District in Andhra
Pradesh. The primary hinterland has a low population density and little industrial activity. The secondary
hinterland covers Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh and Southern Odisha sharing boarder with
Andhra Pradesh and located in close proximity with Bhavanapadu. The primary and secondary
hinterlands of Bhavanapadu port are shown in Figure 1.7.
The tertiary hinterland covers all the neighbouring states, as well as northern states. The secondary and
the distant hinterland is relative large because of the good hinterland connections. The existing ports
along east coast and the existing ports along Andhra coast in close proximity to each other difficult to
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 436
demarcation of the hinterland of each port and overlapping is inevitable to some extent. Hence,
competition among the ports is inescapable.
Bhavanapadu is situated close to the major port of Visakhapatnam. Geographically, Bhavanapadu is
located in an advantage position close to the border stages of Odisha, Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand and
Madhya Pradesh States. Hence, the traffic from the close proximity States of Chhattisgarh, Odisha,
Jharkhand and Madhya Pradesh may also be attracted to Bhavanapadu. Paradip Port is located in Odisha
but because of the congested traffic the Proposed Port may be opted. However, attraction of the cargo
also depends upon the efficiency of the port operations, infrastructure facilities available at the ports.
Thus, development of Bhavanapadu Port is justifiable in terms cargo handling advantages.
11.5 PROPOSED FACILITIES
FACILITIES PROPOSED FOR PHASE I DEVELOPMENT OFFSHORE FACILITY
First north breakwater - 2855 m long
South breakwater - 580 m long
4 nos. of berths
o Coal (One berth)
o General Cargo (Three berth)
NAVIGATIONAL FACILITIES
Approach channel: -19.20 CD depth
Turning circle: -18.40 depth
DREDGING & RECLAMATION
Capital dredging = 14 million cu.m
Maintenance dredging = 2 million cu.m
Reclamation = 2 million cu.m
ONSHORE FACILITY
From DPR
11.6 PROJECT COST
Cost of the project in Phase I = ₹ 3091.90 Cr
Cost of the project in Phase II =
Total cost of the project =
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 437
11.7 DESCRIPTION OF ENVIRONMENT
The baseline data on the terrestrial and marine environment were collected during Three Seasons
(October to December 2020 i.e Post-Monsoon 2020, April to June 2021 i.e Pre-monsoon 2021 and July
to September 2021 i.e Monsoon 2021) by Lotus Granges (India) Ltd.
AIR ENVIRONMENT
Ambient air quality monitoring was done in 5locations. Particulate Matter of PM10, PM2.5 and other
pollutants were found to be within NAAQ standards during the study period.
NOISE ENVIRONMENT
The noise levels are found to be within the ambient noise standards prescribed under Noise
Pollution (Regulation and control) Rules, 2000 by CPCB.
WATER ENVIRONMENT
Ground water: All physical and general parameters were observed within the desirable limit at all
sampling locations as per IS10500:2012. Concentration of all parameters recorded in the ground water
samples for all locations were within the permissible limit of IS 10500 :2012 drinking water standards.
Apart from domestic sources, there are no sources of pollution in the project area. The project area has
no industries and the fertilizer consumption is low.
Thus, it is recommended that water be filtered and disinfected prior to be given to villages for meeting
their drinking water requirements.
Surface water: Surface water quality observed at all stations satisfies for various designated uses as
per CPCB standard such as outdoor bathing, wildlife propagation, drinking water source, irrigation
and industrial purpose.
LAND ENVIRONMENT
Soil quality shows that the soil in the project area is free from any contamination. The soil type varies
from loamy to sand. The soil is strongly acidic to Slightly acidic in nature.
TERRESTRIAL ECOLOGY AND BIODIVERSITY
The IUCN Red list is the world's most comprehensive inventory of the global conservation status of
plant and animal species. It uses a set of criteria to evaluate the extinction risk of thousands of
species and subspecies. These criteria are relevant to all species and all regions of the world. With its
strong scientific base, the IUCN Red List is recognized as the most authoritative guide to the status of
biological diversity.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 438
11.7.5.1 Flora
According to primary and secondary survey, a total of 140 tree species belonging to 49 families were
found in the study area. Mimosaceae and Moraceae were found to be the most dominant families
having 10 species each followed by Caesalpiniaceae with 09 families (Please Refer
Figure 3.22). Out of 140 tree species found in the study area, 133 terrestrial species of trees followed by
04 Marshy Tree Species, 02 Aquatic and 01 semi-aquatic species were found (Please Refer Figure 3.23).
Table 3.29 exhibits the important tree species observed in the study area during the primary survey and
supported by the secondary literature.
The primary and secondary survey reveals the presence of 69 shrub species in the study area and its
environs. Euphorbiaceae is the predominant family representing 11 shrub species in the study area
followed by Malvaceae and Rubiaceae which covers 06 shrub species each. Table 3.30 exhibits the
important shrub species observed in the study area during the primary survey and supported by the
secondary literature.
During the primary survey a total of 343 species of herbaceous flora belonging to 60 families were
recorded which comprised of 241 herbs followed by 71 grasses and 31 species of climbers. Family
Poaceae with 71 herbaceous species is the largest family found in the study area followed by Asteraceae
with 28 species, Cyperaceae 21 species and Fabaceae with 19 species respectively. Table 3.31 exhibits
the important herbaceous flora (Herbs, grasses and climbers) observed in the study area during the
primary survey and supported by the secondary literature.
11.7.5.2 Fauna:
Out of the total 15 mammalian species recorded from the study area Seven (07) species were classified
under Scheduled-II (Par-I) and Three (03) species under Schedule-III and four (04) species under
Schedule-IV. While No mammalian Species were listed under Schedule-I of the Wildlife (Protection), Act,
1972.
No mammalian species is listed under IUCN Red list of Threatened Species Version 2019.3 as Rare,
Endangered and Threatened (REET) Species.
With regards to amphibian species two (02) species were listed under Schedule-IV while no schedule-I, II
& III species were found in the study area. Similarly no herpetofauna of ecological importance were
found in the study area as per IUCN Red List.
Among Reptiles One (01) Schedule-I, three (03) Schedule-II and One (01) Schedule-IV species were found
in the study area. With regards to IUCN Red list of Threatened Species Version 2019.3 as Rare,
Endangered and Threatened (RET) Species, three (03) Vulnerable and three (03) Near Threatened
Reptile species were found in the study area.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 439
With regards to the avifaunal species one (01) Schedule-I were reported/observed in the study area,
whereas five (05) avi-faunal specie are listed as Near Threatened (NT) and one (01) species is listed
under Vulnerable category of IUCN Red list of Threatened Species Version 2019.3.
11.7.5.3 Aquatic Ecology
The data on frequency, density, abundance and diversity index (Shannon Wiener) of Phytoplankton and
Zooplankton at different locations for all three seasons has been presented in Table 3.37 to Table 3.56.
The population density of phytoplankton was varied at all the sampling sites.
Marine Quality Test reports for all three seasons are given in the Table 3.62 to Table 3.64.
The Sediment sampling photographs are shown as Figure 3.28. Sediment sampling results for all three
seasons are given in the below Table 3.66 to Table 3.68.
The creek water analysis results for all three season is given in the Table 3.70 to Table 3.72 respectively.
Phytoplankton: In total, 62 species from 33 genera and 3 main phytoplankton groups were identified.
Of these phytoplankton, 47 species (75.81%) belong to diatoms (Bacillariophyta), 13 species
(20.97%) of dinoflagellates (Pyrrophyta) and 2 species (3.23%) of blue-green algae
(Cyanophyta) during the study period. Diatoms showed the most species diversity than the
dinoflagellates and blue- green algae. – to be addressed in chapter 3 as well
Zooplankton: During the sampling period, totally 47 species of zooplankton were identified.
Copepods were the most diverse group containing the highest number of species, followed by
Decapods, Ciliate groups, Cnidaria, Urochordata, fish eggs and larvae and echinoderms. Copepoda not
only remained as the most dominant group but also appeared in large numbers during the sampling
periods. to be addressed in chapter 3 as well
11.7.5.4 Ecologically Sensitive Area
Proposed port location does not contain environmentally sensitive areas such as National parks / marine
parks, sanctuaries, wildlife habitats, corals / coral reefs. It also does not include breeding and spawning
grounds of fish and other marine life, area of outstanding natural beauty / historically / heritage area,
area rich in genetic diversity. Environmental Sensitivity is given in the Table 3.3.
11.8 ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES
Anticipated impacts on the terrestrial and marine environment likely to arise due to construction and
operation of proposed port and auxiliary facilities have been identified, predicted and mitigation
measures are suggested.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 440
CONSTRUCTION PHASE
To be developed from chapter 4 if required
Impact
Construction of breakwater and diaphragm wall.
Dredging and reclamation.
Piling for construction of berthing jetty.
Material handling, storage and transport.
Operation of various equipment and machineries.
Sewage from construction site.
Mitigation measures
Follow best construction site management practices.
Water sprinkling at areas vulnerable to dust generation.
Roads inside the project area and roads connected to the main road shall be paved or shall be water sprinkled to avoid the fugitive emissions.
Barricades of adequate height with adequate signage especially for areas close to sea.
Use of silt curtains to prevent spreading of dredge plume.
Regular evaluation of heavy metals in dredge spoil used for reclamation.
No storage of construction materials in CRZ I areas.
Sanitary and hygiene measures shall be ensured for workers as per construction workers act and rules.
Solid, Construction and Hazardous waste management as per Solid Waste Management Rules, 2016, Construction and Demolition Waste Management Rules, 2016 and Hazardous Waste Management Rules 2016.
Use of DG set following CPCB norms.
No tapping of ground water for construction activities.
OPERATION PHASE
To be developed from chapter 4 if required
Impact
Cargo handling, storage and transportation.
Runoff of wastewater from stack yard and wharf area into sea.
Impact on marine environment due to increased vessel traffic.
Maintenance dredging.
Mitigation measures
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 441
Handling, storage and transportation of cargoes as per CPCB norms
Installation of water sprinkling system in the stack yard area.
Development of green belt in the periphery of proposed port premise.
Drainage channel and sedimentation pond to control wastewater runoff from Stackyard area.
Solid, Construction and Hazardous waste management as per Solid Waste Management Rules,
2016, Construction and Demolition Waste Management Rules, 2016 and Hazardous Waste
Management Rules 2016.
Special parking facilities for trucks shall be ensured.
Installation of firefighting equipment such as fire hydrant and fire extinguisher in the port area.
Disposal of dredge spoil at identified model designated location.
Development of vessel traffic management system to ensure smooth traffic management and
handling.
Follow risk mitigation measures and action plan mentioned in the Disaster Management Plan.
11.9 ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES
Initially location of Bhavanapadu port was identified on north of Tekkali Creek based on due
diligence carried out. During the terms of reference appraisal by MoEF&CC, it is suggested to explore the
possibility of alternate sites in view of eroding nature of coast towards north of creek, impact on fish
landing center and major R&R issues. (As the development needed acquisition of three (3) fully
habitated villages). Hence alternative locations have been studied.
Three site locations have been evaluated as part of the Techno-Economic Feasibility Report (TEFR) for
development of Port with following alternative studies. Alternative locations identified for Bhavanapadu
Port are shown in Figure 5.1.
Alternative 1: North Side of Tekkali Creek
Alternative 2: Inside the Tekkali Creek
Alternative 3: South Side of Tekkali Creek
11.10 POST PROJECT MONITORING
Post project monitoring program has been planned based on the prediction of impacts and
mitigation measures suggested. Monitoring program is suggested to identify changes in the
terrestrial and marine environment due to operation of port.
Monitoring program shall be done during the construction and operational phase of the project and
it shall be repeated at six monthly interval as suggested by MoEF&CC.
The monitoring shall be organized with qualified and experienced environmental team. Standard
procedure shall be followed in sample collection and analysis. Half yearly monitoring of air, noise,
ground water, seawater quality, seabed sediment and marine ecology is recommended at port
premises, nearby villages, waterfront area and approach channel.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 442
11.11 ADDITIONAL STUDIES
DREDGE DISPOSAL MODELLING
For capital dredging for the Port, considering the site conditions, it is felt that the most suitable type of
dredger is the TSHD. This dredger can easily operate in the exposed conditions experienced in this area.
It can dredge the medium dense to dense silty sand, load the dredged material in its hopper and dump it
at selected offshore disposal location. For inner channel and harbour areas it is felt that CSD will be the
right choice. Thus both TSHB and CSD will have to be deployed for capital dredging at the port.
Alternatively, a trailing suction hopper dredger with pump ashore facilities as considered adequate to
carry out the total dredging quantity.
A trailing suction hopper dredger (TSHD) with a hopper capacity of around 15,000cum is proposed to be
used to accomplish the work within the envisaged time frame.
Nearly XX Mm3 of capital dredged material will be used for raising the backup area and remaining XX
Mm3 will be disposed in offshore area identified based on model studies.
Maintenance Dredging
AIR QUALITY MODELLING
Modelling study predicts that the dust concentration due to coal handling, storage and transport, if
handled without control measures can seriously affect the ambient air quality of project area.
Particularly, working environment of stackyard will be affected with particulate matter concentration.
In other words, the incremental value (Model output) of the specific pollutant at the particular
monitoring station is added to the baseline value of that specific pollutant measured during the
monitoring period of the project. The Resultant Value thus calculated used for predicting the impacts of
the proposed project on the air environment in the study area is not exceeding the NAAQ Limit.
RISK ASSESSMENT
The storage and handling of coal is the main hazard expected during the port operations. Coal is a
potential fire hazard; coal storage requires careful study from the point of view of safety. Fire in coal
stock is also a major source of environmental pollution. In order to avoid these hazards, coal storage
facilities require careful evaluation in respect of fire safety, keeping in mind the characteristics of
the different types of coal used in the industries.
DISASTER MANAGEMENT PLAN
Emergency/disaster is an undesirable occurrence of events of such magnitude and nature that
adversely affect operations, cause loss of human lives and property as well as damage to the
environment. Coastal infrastructure is vulnerable to various kinds of natural and manmade disasters.
Examples of natural disaster are Flood, Cyclone, Tsunami, Earthquake etc., and manmade disasters
like major fire, explosion, sudden heavy leakage of toxic/poisonous chemicals etc. An effective disaster
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 443
management plan helps to minimize the losses in terms of human lives, assets and environmental
damage. A typical Distarter Management Plan is presented in Figure 7.1
The objectives of Disaster Management Plan are:
To contain and control the incident.
To rescue the victim and treat them suitably in quickest possible time.
To safeguard other personnel and evacuate them to safer places.
To identify personnel affected/dead.
To give immediate warning signal to the people in the surrounding areas in case such situation
arising.
To inform relatives of the casualties.
To safeguard important records & information about the organization.
To preserve damaged records & equipment needed as evidence for any subsequent enquiry.
To rehabilitate the affected areas.
To restore the facilities to normal working condition at the earliest.
11.12 PROJECT BENEFITS
Infrastructure construction will have both impacts on the country's economic development. The project
is intended to encourage private firms to engage in the development of the industrial and
transportation sectors. Private investments will generate jobs, which will in turn generate income,
alleviate poverty and enhance living standards of the people.
Potential positive benefits aniticpiated to result from the proposed port development are listed below.
Improved sea transport facilities
Revenue Generation
Better employment opportunities (skilled, semi-skilled and unskilled labour during construction
and operation phases of the project with specific attention to employment potential of local
population)
Improvement in Physical Infrastructure like project infrastructure and ancillary industries
Improvement in social infrastructure like roads, railways, townships, housing, water supply,
electrical power, drainage, educational institutions, hospitals, improved environmental
conditions etc.
Reduction of material costs due to reduction of transport cost.
The project and its benefits must be taken for the overall port project in its entirety. As a part of
the port project, there are several components that are linked to the port which will also add to
the list of benefits. For example, the road and rail connectivity, which will play an integral part
in the overall undertaking, will also bring several benefits to the region. The benefits of all these
components which will together be integrated with the port development are detailed in the
following sections.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 444
11.13 ENVIRONMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN
Environment Management Plan is prepared to ensure effective implementation of suggested
mitigation measures. This plan includes Air quality management plan, Noise quality management plan,
Water management plan, Solid and Hazardous waste management plan, Dredge spoil management
plan, Shoreline monitoring plan, Flood management plan, Green belt development plan, Renewable
energy and energy conservation plan, Cargo management plan etc.
An Environment Management Cell (EMC) will be formed, which will be responsible for
implementation, supervision and monitoring of environment during construction and operation
phases of the project. The EMC shall report environmental performance and monitoring reports
including compliance of EC conditions to statutory authorities.
Budgetary estimates for effective EMP is shown in Table 10-11
A total capital cost of 1610.0 lakhs, Annual recurring cost of 63.1 lakhs per year and Total recurring cost
for 30 years is 189.3 lakhs for construction phase as EMP budget is estimated.
A total capital cost of 556.7 lakhs, Annual recurring cost of 453.3 lakhs per year and Total recurring cost
for 30 years is 12911.1 lakhs for operation phase as EMP budget is estimated.
11.14 CONCLUSION
Within the ambit of the ToR issued by the EAC, the EIA studies have been conducted and impacts
predicted. It has been ensured that all possible environmental aspects are touched and assessed
both quality wise and quantity wise. Necessary control and mitigation measures in context to
adverse impacts have been proposed to meet the statutory environmental requirements. The
environmental management plan has been formulated and the financial implications worked out.
The implementation of the project has not lead to any significant negative impact on the
environment, however it has added employment opportunity and improving the lifestyle of the
local people.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 445
CHAPTER 12 DISCLOSURE OF CONSULTANT
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 446
12 DISCLOSURE OF CONSULTANT ENGAGED
12.1 BRIEF PROFILE OF COMPANY
Voyants Solutions Private Limited (VSPL) is one of India’s fastest growing, premier infrastructure
consultancy services firms with global footprint. Voyants provides end-to-end, integrated infrastructure
solutions across all major sectors viz. transportation, roads, bridges, railways, ports, residential
townships, commercial complexes, industrial parks, SEZs, urban infrastructure, smart cities, energy,
water & sanitation and waste management.
Voyants provides concept to commissioning services throughout the project life cycle. It takes on every
element of infrastructure project ranging from project initiation and feasibility, planning, environment
and sustainability management, privatization and project advisory, detailed design, tendering, project
management and construction supervision, commissioning and finally to operation and maintenance.
The creative energies of our multi-disciplinary team of more than 1000 professionals help transform
great ideas into realities. Our technical prowess and global footprint enable us to provide engineering
solutions under myriad codes and specifications applicable across the world coupled with state-of-the-
art analytical tools and market sensitive strategic thinking. Our multifarious teams have helped
multilateral, public and private sector Clients in their endeavor to build infrastructure for tomorrow. Our
teams have delivered some of the most innovative, challenging and fast track projects across 200 cities
in 28 countries in three continents viz. Asia, Africa and Europe.
Voyants is an ISO 9001: 2015 certified firm and NABET accredited EIA consultant in twelve sectors.
Voyants is registered with a number of international and national funding agencies and empaneled with
more than 100 government agencies globally. Our Clients include Fortune 500 companies, blue-chip
corporations, multilateral funding institutions, prestigious government agencies and key lending
institutions.
We take pride in listening to our Clients, understand their needs and deliver effective and efficient
solutions. We have nurtured many successful partnerships to evolve best suited infrastructure models.
Consequently, most of our Clients give us repeat assignments. We differentiate our services on the basis
of continuous Client engagement, timely delivery, cost efficient plans / designs and the quality of our
service delivery.
VSPL is constantly striving towards excellence in terms of value addition to the projects being handled
and in this endeavour we are broadening our horizons in terms of major sectors The Company has Nine
Operational Verticals:
Infrastructure Planning & Design (IPD)
Architecture & Project Management (APM)
Environment Management Service (EMS)
Rail Infrastructure Division (RID)
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 447
Ports & Marine Services (PMS)
Transportation, Road & Bridges (TRB)
Energy Division (ED)
Water & Sanitation Division (WSD)
Operations & Maintenance Services (OMS)
At Voyants, we carefully plan and manage the environmental outcome of each of our projects. When we
think projects, we think of sustainability. We work in partnership with clients to strive for the twin goals
of growth and sustainability. The strength of VSPL lies in its Environmental, Social & Sustainability
Advisory Services. VSPL has extensive experience and proven track record in the field of Environmental
and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA), Environment & Social Due Diligence Audit (ESDD) and Reporting,
Occupational Health and Safety (OHS) Management, Environment Social Management Framework
(ESMF), Environmental and Social Management Plan (ESMP), Social & Environmental Safeguard
Monitoring and Review, Implementation of Environmental Management Plans (EMP),Public
Consultations & Stakeholder Engagement Plan (SEP), Resettlement Action Plan (RAP), Resettlement
Action Framework (RAF), Rehabilitation & Resettlement (R&R study), Livelihood Restoration Plan (LRP),
Social Impact Assessment, Ecology & Biodiversity Study including Biodiversity Management Plan
(BMP),Water & Energy Audits, Analysis of Alternatives, Monitoring Supervision and Implementation of
ESMP
We have delivered more than 565 projects; that have successfully cleared all stringent environmental
prerequisites. We strongly believe that by shifting the energy burden from non-renewable to renewable
resources, we can stand up to the challenges of the future. VSPL is accredited as “Category “A”
Organization under QCI NABET Version 3 for twelve Sectors”. Viz.
Sector: 1 Mining of minerals (open cast only)
Sector: 3 River Valley Projects
Sector: 4 Thermal Power Plants
Sector: 7 Mineral Beneficiation
Sector: 28 Isolated Storage & Handling of Hazardous Chemicals
Sector: 33 Ports, harbours, break waters and dredging
Sector: 31 Industrial estates/ parks/ complexes/Areas, export processing Zones (EPZs),Special economic zones (SEZs), Biotech Parks, Leather Complexes
Sector: 34 Highways
Sector: 36 Common Effluent Treatment Plants
Sector: 37 Common Municipal Solid Waste Management Facility (CMSWMF)
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 448
Sector: 38 Building and Construction Projects
Sector: 39 Township and Area Development projects
M/s VSPL is a NABET accredited consultant (Certificate No. NABET/EIA/2124/RA 0223 Dated
14/09/2024) for different categories including Ports, Harbours, Break Waters and Dredging Cat A
Projects and hence eligible for completing the Environment Assessment. .Expert team worked on the
present report is given in the earlier part of the report.
12.2 TEAM OF PROFESSIONAL
Voyants has team of highly talented and experienced professionals. Our multi-disciplinary team,
comprising more than 1000 professionals including approved EIA Coordinators and Functional Area
Experts covering all the functional area expertise (LU, AP, AQ, WP, EB, NV, SE, HG, GEO, SC, RH, and
SHW) & many more from premier institutions and hand-picked from the best in the industry. We
provide robust intellectual infrastructure for our talent pool with state-of-the-art hardware and
software. Our experts team consists of Environment engineers, Environment specialist, Policy analysts,
geologists, chemists, Safety Experts, civil engineers, hydro geologists, Bio-diversity experts, industrial
hygienists, technicians, research associates, sociologists and others with expertise in various niche areas.
They undergo various training sessions at regular intervals to keep themselves updated with new ideas,
techniques and tools.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 449
Table 12.1: Qualification and Area of Expertise of Professional Name Qualification Project Role Experience/Responsibility
Upendar Rao Kollu
BE Civil, M Tech Ports & Marine Structures
EIA-Coordinator Ports, Harbours, break waters and Dredging
Mr. Upendra Rao Kollu, the Managing Director of VSPL has comprehensive experience in Ports, Infrastructure and Industrial Park/ SEZ projects, both domestic and international. He has also an in-depth working experience in EIA – EMP and Risk analysis projects as well as have a great zeal and zest for Environment and sustainability studies for ports, harbours and marine sector. Mr. Upendra is a Civil Engineer from Andhra University and M. Tech (Marine Structures) from NIT, Suratkal. He has done Executive Management Development Program and training in remote sensing & digital image processing with ISRO; port planning, operations & design aspects in Denmark; various ports in Europe and Asia. He has extensive experience of managing organizations and projects across infrastructure sectors; covering ports, shipyards, Special Economic Zones (SEZs), industrial free trade zones, highways/special logistic corridors, logistic hubs, airports, power projects, urban transportation and environmental projects. He comes with unique experience of working on all facets of projects as a consultant, planner, designer, privatization expert, project management expert and developer. He has been instrumental in developing several prestigious port and infrastructure projects under PPP mode from concept to commissioning. He has been recently selected by CII as a Member of its National Committee on Urban Development & Smart Cities for 2019-20.
Yamesh Sharma B.Sc. Civil Engineering EIA-Coordinator River Valley & Irrigation Projects, Mining Projects. FAE HG, SC & NV.
More than 46-year comprehensive experience in designing, planning, construction and maintenance of hydraulic structures (Dam, dam site and Canals), besides in following areas: - Environment Impact Assessment Hydrology & Hydro-Geology Ground Water Estimation Water optimization & conservation Land Use and Cover Study Noise modelling & Vibration Air quality modeling and prediction. Soil Conservation & Quality Analysis Rainwater Harvesting & Storm Water Management Catchment Area Treatment Dam Break Analysis Command Area Development
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 450
Name Qualification Project Role Experience/Responsibility
Santoshkumar Kulkarni
M. Sc. Environmental Sciences
FAE- WP, AP and AQ Overall responsibility to deliver the project to VSPL standards and client expectations following the applicable guidelines. As a FAE he does the following works Interpretation and assessment of ambient air quality data and
meteorological data for cumulative impact assessment. Identification & assessment of quantum of emissions. Study of the requirement of suitable air pollution control devices Air Modelling using ISCST 3 Impacts identified and mitigation measures suggested in the EMP.
Dr. Dhananjay Meshram
Ph. D Geology M. Sc. Geology
FAE Geo and HG He has more than 30 years of technical working experience, out of which he worked more than 27 years with University of Pune mainly for Geology, Petroleum Geology, River basin Studies. Groundwater exploration in Tamil Nadu State
Since 2005 (more than 14 years), he is working as FAE for Geology and Land Use doing the following works Assessment of baseline geology and land use Impact prediction w.r.t. Geology & Land use of the study area
Mr. Aprup Adwadkar
M. A. Gandhian Thought Risk Assessment and Hazard Management
More than -year comprehensive experience in Risk Assessment and Hazard Management, besides in following areas: - Guiding in carrying out impact assessment studies and work related to
safety and disaster management plans for international project. Assist on regulatory and non-Regulatory projects Modify the basic write up on empanelled sector(s) provided by us Expert advice on the empanelled sector(s) Sign document related to environmental study as empanelled FAE. Presence and technical advice during meeting at MOEF/ SEAC, if required
Dr. Arvind Prakash Dubey
Ph. D. Sociology FAE SE More than 12 years of experience in the following areas: Preparation of Socio-economic Report for Infrastructure Project like
Industrial Park, Rail, Road River Valley, Renewable Energy etc. Stakeholders Identification and Consultations. Preparation of Rehabilitation and Resettlement and Livelihood Restoration
Plan. Tribal Development and Management Plan.
Ms. Reshma M.Tech Environmental (For EIA coordinator / More than 18-years comprehensive experience in Risk Assessment and Hazard
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 451
Name Qualification Project Role Experience/Responsibility
Thakur Management Functional area expert and Functional area associates)
Management (Dam, dam site and Canals), besides in following areas: - Carrying out impact assessment studies and work related to Industrial
Estate, Construction Project, Area Development, Municipal Solid Waste Management facility and MSW for National and International Project
Sign document related to Environmental study as empanelled Environmental Coordinator and FAE.
Presence and technical advice during meeting at MOEF&CC, EAC/ SEAC, if required.
Prepare Form I and IA and Prepare TOR Presentation Write and Review EIA – EMP report and compile as Sector Expert. Attend Public Hearing if any Finalize the Draft EIA- EMP report Present Case in SEIAA/SEAC/MOEFCC Address the Comments if any Spearhead the project as Sector Expert and complete in stipulated time
unless delay by Statutory Authorities
Dr. Ashish Rawat
PhD (Forest Ecology and Environment) M. Sc. Environmental Sciences
FAE- EB, SC With more than 14 years of comprehensive experience, Dr. Ashish Rawat has carried out EIA, ESIA and ESHIA studies for more than 70 development projects in different domains viz., Road and Highways, Wind and Solar Energy, Oil and Gas, Waste Management for the Multilateral Funding Agencies including, the World bank, JICA, ADB, African Development Bank, NHAI and Saudi Aramco (Saudi Arabian Oil Company) in India, Nepal, Yemen, Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Bahrain
Debasmita Biswal B.Tech Mechanical Engineering and Specialization in Photogrammetry
FAE- Land Use More than 15-year experience in the following areas: - Land Use & Land Cover Mapping (Remote Sensing &GIS Software) Change in Land Use /Land cover Photogrammetry
Ms. Disha Rao M.Sc Environmental Science
FAE – WP, SHW (SW, HW) TM – AQ, AP
More than 6 + year experience in the Environment Consulting. Worked on following areas:
Screening and scoping of the projects for Environmental Clearance, preparation of PFR and Form-I.
Preparation of EIA/EMP report for Industrial, mining and Infrastructure projects.
Handling and Managing NABET Application, QMS, coordinating with the IH and Empanelled experts.
Carrying out Air Dispersion Modelling using Aermod 9.6.1 software.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 452
Name Qualification Project Role Experience/Responsibility
Interpretation and assessment of ambient air quality data and meteorological data for cumulative impact assessment.
Waste design calculation for STP, ETP and ZLD for industrial projects.
Mr. Kamal Singh
MA in Public Administration
FAE- SE Mr. Kamal is a social expert with over 14 years of experience Shall be responsible for carrying out socio economic survey and preparation of R&R plan if applicable.
Support Staff
Ms. Ayushi Khokhar
M.Sc. Environmental Sciences
Environmental Executive
Primary data generation, field visit in-line with agreed scope of work
Mr. Munnakumar
B.Com Social Executive Primary data generation, field visit in-line with agreed scope of work including Stakeholder questionnaire survey and FGD, admin support for the project
Mr. Semineni Bhaskar
B Tech Civil Site Support Baseline Supervision, Social filed Study and Meetings with MLC, Sub District Collector and MRO and Panchayat.
Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
Draft EIA Report
Page | 453
12.3 LOTUS GRANGES (INDIA) LTD.
Lotus Granges (India) Ltd. was engaged by the consultant for carrying out the environmental monitoring
for the various parameters of Meteorology, Ambient Air Quality, Ambient Noise Quality, Water Quality
(Surface, Ground, and Marine & Creek), Soil Quality, and Aquatic Monitoring for Post Monsoon, Pre-
Monsoon and Monsoon Seasons.
Accreditations & Certifications
National Accreditation Board for Testing & Calibration Laboratories (Department of Science &
Technology, Government of India) Accreditation 17025:2005 Certification (Chemical Testing-TC. 8219).
National Accreditation Board forTesting and Calibration Laboratories(A Constituenl goard of Qualily Corrcil of lndia)
CERTfF'ICATE OF ACCREDITATION
ffiACI
LOTUS GRANGES (INDTA) LTD.
has bcen assessed and accredited in accordance \Yith the standard
ISO/IEC 17025:2005
"General Requirements for the Competence of Testing &Calibration Laboratoriesr I
for its facilities at
NO. 371/10, 2ND RAILWAY BRIDGE, SHE'LA NAGAR TO VSEZ BACK GATE ROAD, VISAKHAPATNAM,ANDHRA PRADESH, INDIA
in the field of
TESTINGCertificateNumben TC-8219
Issue DAte: 21112/2018
ln viery of the triNition deadlirc for ISOiIEC 17025:2017, the validi! of this accrcditation ceffffcate sill ceas e on 30.11.2020.
This ceftificate remains valitl for the Scope ofAccreditation as specified in the annexure subject to continued
satisfactory compliance to the above standard & the relevant requiremeuts ofNABL(To see the scope olaccnrditation ofthis labol?tory, you riay also visit NABLn€bsite *${nabl-india.org)
Signed for and on behalfofNABL
h"J-9-'-Anil Relia
Chief Executive Oflicer
Valid Until: 20t12t2020
Certifcate to be replaced with New Certificate expected within One week
Naupada
Mulapeta
Lingudu
Vishnuchakram
298
157
256
282
194
260
247
295
275
296
278
189
277
229
257
196
245
195
255
266
193
281
197
267
265
263
239 240
287
292
184
258
274
248
235
225
180
244
280
238
283
226
191
259
251
264
254253
188
249
288
241
202
190
237
290
228227
233
291
284
222
231
279
250
273
173
272
285
252
232
181
269
270
199
185
242
224
297
293
243
276
268
286
179
236
174
186
271
171
230
294
201
187
234
246
200
178182
183
172
169
192
289
198203
262
177
261
176
Santhabommali
Mulapeta
84°20'0"E
84°20'0"E
84°19'0"E
84°19'0"E18
°33'0"
N 18°33
'0"N
18°32
'0"N 18
°32'0"
N
Andhra pradesh
BAY OFBENGAL
ARABIAN SEA
I N D I A
PROJECT LOCATION!
HTL, LTL AND CRZ MAPPING FOR THE PROPOSED PROJECTSITE GREENFIELD PORT AT MULAPETA VILLAGE,
SANTHABOMMALI MENDAL,ANDHRA PRADESHVerified by Approved by
PRE D R A F T
(Ministry of Environment, Forest & Climate Change)Chennai - 25
Prepared by
National Centre for Sustainable Coastal Management
Prepared forM/s Voyants Solutions Pvt.Ltd.
Bay of Bengal
0 300150
Meters
S C A L E
µ 1:4000
LegendRoadHigh Tide LineLow Tide Line100 m Line in CRZ III Area200 m CRZ Line - NDZ500 m CRZ LineCRZ Line for River or Creek
\\\\
\\\\
\\\\Salt Marsh - CRZ IASand Dune - CRZ IA
##
#
# # # # ###
#####
Sand Dune Beyond CRZ BoundaryMangroves - CRZ IA
50m Mangrove Buffer Zone - CRZ IAMudflats - CRZ IAIntertidal Zone - CRZ IBNo Development Zone - CRZ III200 m to 500 m from HTL - CRZ IIIWaterbody - CRZ IVAWaterbody - CRZ IVBSurvey PlotsVillage BoundaryMandal Boundary
Proposed Project Site(As given by Project Proponent)
A.Coal Berth 1B.GC1/Fertilizer BerthC.Ceneral CargoBerth 2D.GC3/ContainerBerthApproach TrestleCeneral Cargo BerthCoal Stacky yardContainerCustoms BuildingFire Station
Food GrainsFurure ExpansionContainer YardGate ComplexGeneral Cargo(Closed)General Cargo (Open)Guard RoomGuest HouseImmediate PortBeckup AreaNorthern BreakwaterOil Jetty
Over Head WaterTankPort Admin BuildingSecurity CumReception BLDGSouthern BreakwaterSub StationTurning Circle 575mUnaccessed WasteLandUnderfround WaterTankWagon
Social Impact Assessment Report
DEVELOPMENT OF GREENFIELD PORT AT BHAVANAPADU IN SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA
PRADESH
ANDHRA PRADESH MARITIME BOARD
VOYANTS SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED 403, 4th Floor, Park CentraSector – 30, NH – 8, Gurugram – 122001,Haryana, India
Consultant
FEBRUARY 2022
ANDHRA PRADESH MARITIME BOARD
GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
Development of Greenfield Port at Bhavanapadu, Srikakulam District in the
State of Andhra Pradesh
DRAFT SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (SIA)
REPORT
February 2022
Voyants Solutions Pvt. Ltd. 403, 4th Floor, Park Centra
Sector – 30, NH – 8, Gurugram– 122 001, India Tel: +91-124-4598200 (30 Lines), Fax: +91-124- 4019051,
E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.voyants.in
Draft SIA Report
February 2022
Development of Greenfield Port at Bhavanapadu, Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
P a g e | i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. 1
1.1 Background ......................................................................................................................... 1
1.2 Overview of the Project ...................................................................................................... 1
1.3 Social Impact Assessment ................................................................................................... 1
1.4 Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) ......................................................................................... 2
1.5 Definitions and Concepts .................................................................................................... 2
2 LEGAL AND POLICY FRAMEWORK ................................................................................................. 5
2.1 Purpose and Objective........................................................................................................ 5
2.2 Legal Framework for Land Acquisition, Resettlement and Rehabilitation ......................... 6
2.2.1 The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition,
Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (RFCTLARR, 2013) .............................. 6
2.2.2 Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation
and Resettlement (Andhra Pradesh Amendment) Act, 2018. ................................ 9
2.2.3 The Gazette of India, Extraordinary, S.O 425(E), Ministry of Rural Development
Notification dated 9th February 2016 ................................................................... 11
2.2.4 The Provisions of the Panchayats (Extension to the Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996 11
2.2.5 The Scheduled Tribes and other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest
Rights) Act 2006. .................................................................................................. 12
2.2.6 The Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 198912
2.2.7 Right to Information Act, 2005 ............................................................................. 13
2.2.8 CSR activities under Companies Act 2013 ............................................................ 13
2.3 Applicable Social Safeguard Policy for proposed Greenfield Port Project at
Bhavanapadu .................................................................................................................... 15
2.4 Entitlement Matrix ........................................................................................................... 16
3 APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................... 25
3.1 Approach .......................................................................................................................... 25
3.2 Methodology .................................................................................................................... 25
3.2.1 Public Consultations ............................................................................................. 26
4 SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE OF THE STUDY AREA ...................................................................... 27
4.1 Project Impact Area .......................................................................................................... 27
4.2 Tertiary Project Impact Area (PIA): The State of Andhra Pradesh ................................... 27
4.3 Secondary Project Impact Area (PIA): Srikakulam District ............................................... 28
4.3.1 Demographic Profile of the District ...................................................................... 28
4.3.2 Culture and Religion ............................................................................................. 29
4.3.3 Literacy Rate ......................................................................................................... 29
4.3.4 Social Stratification in the District ........................................................................ 29
4.3.5 Work Participation Rate ....................................................................................... 30
4.4 Primary Project Impact Area ............................................................................................ 30
4.4.1 Demographic Profile ............................................................................................. 30
4.4.2 Social Stratification ............................................................................................... 31
Draft SIA Report
February 2022
Development of Greenfield Port at Bhavanapadu, Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
P a g e | ii
4.4.3 Literacy Rate ......................................................................................................... 31
4.4.4 Work Participation Rate ....................................................................................... 31
4.4.5 Main Worker and Marginal Worker ..................................................................... 31
4.4.6 Categorization of Main Worker ............................................................................ 32
4.4.7 Categorization of Marginal Worker ..................................................................... 32
4.4.8 Social Infrastructure ............................................................................................. 32
4.5 Socio-economic Survey of Project Impact Area ............................................................... 33
4.5.1 Household Composition of PAFs ........................................................................... 33
4.5.2 Social Stratification and Religion of PAFs ............................................................. 33
4.5.3 Land Holding Pattern of the PAFs ......................................................................... 34
4.5.4 Occupational Pattern of the People of PAFs......................................................... 34
4.5.5 Income Pattern of the PAFs .................................................................................. 34
4.5.6 Expenditure Pattern of the PAFs........................................................................... 35
4.5.7 Possession of Durable Consumer Items ................................................................ 35
4.5.8 Status and Role of Women in Economic Activities ............................................... 36
4.5.9 Role of Women in Decision Making ...................................................................... 36
5 SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT ..................................................................................................... 38
5.1 Impact on Land ................................................................................................................. 38
5.2 Impact on Settlement ....................................................................................................... 38
5.3 Rehabilitation and Resettlement Budget ......................................................................... 39
6 GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL MECHANISM ........................................................................................ 41
6.1 Constitution of Grievance Redressal Committee (GRC) ................................................... 41
6.2 Operational Mechanism ................................................................................................... 41
6.3 Site Level Committees: ..................................................................................................... 42
6.4 Role of APMB/EA Headquarters ....................................................................................... 42
7 MONITORING AND EVALUATION ............................................................................................... 43
7.1 Internal Monitoring and Reporting .................................................................................. 43
7.2 External Monitoring .......................................................................................................... 45
7.3 Evaluation and Reporting ................................................................................................. 46
7.4 Monitoring, Evaluation and Reporting Schedule.............................................................. 47
8 CONCLUSION............................................................................................................................... 49
LIST OF TABLE
Table 2.1: Important Schedules and Sections of RFCTLARR 2013 .......................................................... 8
Table 2.2: Types of Activities as per Scheduled VII of Companies Act .................................................. 13
Table 2.3: Entitlement Matrix ............................................................................................................... 16
Table 3.1: Steps taken to prepare SIA & RAP Reports .......................................................................... 25
Table 4.1: Demographic Profile of the District...................................................................................... 28
Table 4.2: Religion wise distribution of Population .............................................................................. 29
Table 4.3: Social Stratification in the District ....................................................................................... 29
Table 4.4: Demographic Profile of the Affected Villages ...................................................................... 31
Table 4.5: Details of SC and ST Population ........................................................................................... 31
Draft SIA Report
February 2022
Development of Greenfield Port at Bhavanapadu, Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
P a g e | iii
Table 4.6: Literacy Rate of the Affected Villages .................................................................................. 31
Table 4.7: Work Participation Rate of the Affected Villages ................................................................ 31
Table 4.8: Main Worker and Marginal Worker ..................................................................................... 32
Table 4.9: Categorization of Main Worker............................................................................................ 32
Table 4.10: Categorization of Marginal Worker ................................................................................... 32
Table 4.11: Educational Infrastructure ................................................................................................. 33
Table 4.12: Household Composition of the People of Affected Villages .............................................. 33
Table 4.13: Land Holding Pattern of PAFs ............................................................................................. 34
Table 4.14: Occupational Pattern of the People of affected Villages .................................................. 34
Table 4.15: Income Pattern of the PAFs .............................................................................................. 35
Table 4.16: Expenditure Pattern of the PAFs ....................................................................................... 35
Table 4.17: Possession of Durable Consumer Items ............................................................................ 35
Table 4.18: Engagement of Women in Economic Activities ................................................................ 36
Table 4.19: Role of Women in Decision Making of Households Matter .............................................. 36
Table 5.1: Details of Land to be Acquired/Transferred for the Proposed Project ................................ 38
Table 5.2: Rehabilitation and Resettlement Budget ............................................................................. 39
Table 7.1: Monitoring for RAP and Resettlement Activity Implementation ......................................... 43
Table 7.2: Impact Evaluation Indicator ................................................................................................. 47
ANNEXURE
Annexure – I: Site Photographs
Draft SIA Report
February 2022
Development of Greenfield Port at Bhavanapadu, Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
P a g e | 1
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background
Andhra Pradesh is amongst the first maritime states to recognize the imperative need for increased port
infrastructure. Government of Andhra Pradesh has prepared a perspective development of ports all along
its 996 km coastline. In this direction, the Andhra Pradesh Maritime Board was set up by Government of
Andhra Pradesh to help in rapid development of port sector in Andhra Pradesh and to aid the associated
development in the hinterland besides offshore areas connected to the ports. The Andhra Pradesh
Maritime Board Act came into force with effect from 16th December-2016. In pursuance of the port
infrastructure development, Andhra Pradesh Maritime Board (APMB) has awarded the work for
Preparation of Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Report and obtained Environmental Clearance
from MoEF&CC for the development of Greenfield Port at Bhavanapadu in Srikakulam District, Andhra
Pradesh M/s Voyants Solutions Pvt. Ltd.
As part of its endeavor in the development of port infrastructure, APMB decided to undertake
development of Greenfield port at Bhavanapadu in Srikakulam District. In this regard, APMB decided to
prepare the technical feasibility and financial viability of such development at the proposed location.
Based on the technical feasibility and financial viability, it is planned to develop the Project by APMB
through a Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV) formed under AP Maritime Board.
1.2 Overview of the Project
Proposed Project site for the development of Bhavanapadu Greenfield Port is a coastal village, located at
North-East corner of Andhra Pradesh at village Rajapuram, Mandal Santhabommali, District Srikakulam
in the state of Andhra Pradesh. The location of proposed project is about 80 nautical miles from north
east of Visakhapatnam Port. The National Highway No. 16 (Chennai-Kolkata) is at a distance of about
25km from the proposed Bhavanapadu port. The nearest railway station to the proposed port location is
Naupada Junction (East Coast Railway) on Chennai- Howrah BG main line at about 7 kms from
Bhavanapadu. Naupada junction is 177km from Visakhapatnam and 231km from Bhubaneswar. The
identified port area involves other villages called Mulapeta, Rajapuram, K.Lingudu. Bhavanapadu port is
located in southern bank of Tekkali Creek at about 2.50 kilometers south of Tekkali river confluence. This
port is about 80 nautical miles of northeast of Visakhapatnam port. A fishery harbour exists at
Bhavanapadu. The nearest town to the Port locations are: Tekkali at about 20 Km in Western Direction;
Palasa at about 25 Km in North Direction; Srikakulam at about 75 Km in Southern Direction and
Vishakhapatnam at about 175 Km in south Direction.
1.3 Social Impact Assessment
The Social Impact Assessment (SIA) includes a Census of all likely affected structures, and sample Socio-
economic Survey of project affected households. It also includes Consultations and Focused Group
Discussions (FGDs) with the affected people. The SIA identifies and measures impacts on land, residential
and commercial structures. The impact of the project on title holders, tenants, encroachers, squatters,
kiosks, wage earners/ operators residing/ operating on existing public/ government land and loss of
livelihood due to implementation of the proposed project.
Draft SIA Report
February 2022
Development of Greenfield Port at Bhavanapadu, Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
P a g e | 2
SIA shall be carried out with the following broad objectives:
Assess adversely affected land and structures,
Benchmark affected land, structures, affected families and socio-economic status of the affected people,
Identifying potential impacts of the project affected families, and
Identifying impacts on the Community Property Resources.
1.4 Resettlement Action Plan (RAP)
The Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) shall be prepared to provide mitigation measures of the impact
identified in the Social Impact Assessment (SIA).
An Entitlement Matrix (EM) shall be formulated with all possible types of losses and the corresponding
nature and scope of eligibility for entitlements. The Entitlement Matrix shall adopt the provisions of the
Land Acquisition (LA), Rehabilitation and Resettlement (R&R) assistances from The Andhra Pradesh State
Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation & Resettlement (Andhra
Pradesh Amendment) Act, 2018 and RFCTLARR Act, 2013.
The RAP shall also include entitlements for different types of impacts, institutional mechanisms,
implementation schedules, land acquisition and R&R budgets, assessment of income restoration
mechanisms, grievance redress mechanism, and internal and external monitoring mechanisms.
1.5 Definitions and Concepts
The definitions of concepts and terms, used in this combined report of SIA & RAP, are provided below:
Agricultural Land: Land used in agriculture and other related activities is known as agricultural
land. This includes land used in agricultural operations, dairy farming, poultry farming,
pisciculture, sericulture, seed farming, breeding of live stocks, nurseries growing medicinal herbs,
garden produce, grazing of cattle etc.
Assistance: All supporting mechanisms viz., monetary help, extension of services, training of
staffs and assets given to PAFs constitute assistance in this project.
BPL: The Poverty Level is estimated as monthly per capita expenditure of Rs. 1,407 in urban areas
and Rs. 972 in rural areas as per the Rangarajan Committee1, 2014.
Commissioner: It refers to Commissioner for Rehabilitation and Resettlement appointed under
sub-section (l) of section 44 of RFCTLARR Act 2013.
Area of Impact (AoI): Area of Impact (AoI) is the area required for the actual construction of the
project, external road and rail connectivity, shoulder, embankment, longitudinal drainage,
wayside amenities and necessary safety zones.
1 The 5 member Expert Committee under the Chairmanship of Dr. C. Rangarajan (former Chairperson of the Prime Ministers
Economic Advisory Council) was constituted by the Planning Commission of India in June 2012 to review the methodology
for measurement of Poverty. The Report of Rangarajan Committee was accepted by the Ministry of Planning, Statistics and
Programme Implementation on 7th August 2014.
Draft SIA Report
February 2022
Development of Greenfield Port at Bhavanapadu, Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
P a g e | 3
Daily Structure: Any daily or seasonal commercial structure, which is erected daily within an hour
and generally made of very temporary materials like, plastic, tarpaulin, bamboo etc. Daily
structures are used mainly used by vegetable vendors or vendors of daily market.
Displaced Household (DH): Any household living, cultivating land or carrying on business or trade
or any other occupation within the Corridor of Impact (CoI) and are impacted by the project and
displaced either physically or economically, is called a displaced household.
Displaced Person (DP): Any individual or part of the displaced household living, cultivating land
or carrying on business, trade or any other occupation within the Corridor of Impact (CoI) who
have been impacted by the project and displaced either physically or economically, is called a
displaced person (DP)
Elderly Old age: All the persons of a family, having age of at least 60 years or more.
Encroacher: Any person illegally occupying public property by extending their land boundary or a
portion of their building onto the existing government land.
Entitled Person (EP): Entitled Person includes all those who qualify for, or are entitled to,
compensation/ assistance since being impacted by the project.
Household means family, as defined in the Census 2011.
Kiosk: Kiosk is a small, separated garden pavilion or small booths open on some or all sides
offering goods and services.
Land Owner: Land Owners are as per recorded in revenue records, or Land occupiers with claims/
rights recognized under State/ Central laws, including who is entitled to granted Patta rights on
the land under any laws of the State including assigned Land.
Marginal Farmer: A cultivator with an un-irrigated land holding up to one hectare or irrigated
land holding up to one-half hectare is known as marginal farmer.
Non-Perennial Crop: Plants that have grown naturally or through cultivation do not last for more
than two growing seasons is known as non-perennial crop. Examples: paddy, sugarcane,
groundnut, etc.
Patta: Patta is a land in revenue record which establishes the title/ownership of land.
The Patta Register is maintained at Taluka office and contains ownership details of all Land
holdings.
Perennial Crop: Any plant species that live for years and yields its products after a certain age of
maturity is known as perennial crop. Generally, trees, either grown naturally or horticultural and
yield fruits or timber are considered as perennial crops in the project. For example, tamarind,
mango, teak, neem etc. are perennial crops.
Persons losing their Livelihood: Individual members of affected households who are at least 18
years of age and have been impacted by loss of primary occupation or source of income is known
as ‘Person Losing their Livelihood’.
Draft SIA Report
February 2022
Development of Greenfield Port at Bhavanapadu, Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
P a g e | 4
Private Property Owners: Private property owners are persons who have legal title to structures,
land or other assets other than Government structures, land or other assets.
Replacement Cost: Replacement cost is the amount of money to be required by an affected
person to replace the existing asset with an equally valued or similar asset at the current market
price. It includes the transaction costs and taxes, if any.
Resettlement Area refers to an area where the affected families who have been displaced from
their place of living because of land acquisition are relocated by the appropriate authority.
Residual Land: Residual land can be defined as the remaining portion of a land parcel left with
the owner after the involuntary acquisition of land by the project authority.
Severance of Land: Severance of land can be defined as division of a land parcel into two or more
pieces. Each severed parcel of land becomes a separate plot with new owners. Severance of Land
can take place due to acquisition of land for laying new project alignments, such as bypass or re-
alignment of roads or railway tracks.
Squatter: A person who unlawfully occupies an uninhabited building or unused land is called a
squatter. He may occupy the parcel of land or built-up structure for residential or business
purposes. The families, who have built their own structures on the land of the landlords with
some financial arrangements, which are not properly documented or legalized, are also
considered as squatters.
Tenant: A tenant is someone who pays rent for the place he/she lives in, or for land or buildings
that they use. The family residing/ occupying in the structures with some financial arrangements
with the landlords, which may not be properly documented or legalized, are also considered as
tenants.
Wheeler Vendor: A Vendor operating in a cart like structure on three or more wheels. Wheelers
are used mainly by mobile hawkers.
Women Headed Household (WHH): A household that is headed by a woman is called a Woman
Headed Household. The aforesaid woman may be a spinster or a widow or separated or deserted
by her husband.
Vulnerable Group (VG): A vulnerable group is a population that has some specific characteristics
that make it at higher risk of falling into poverty rather than others living in areas targeted by a
project and includes: (i) PAFs falling under Below Poverty Line (BPL) category; (ii) persons who
belong to Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST); (iii) Women Headed Households; (iv)
Elderly old age people living alone; and (v) Physically and mentally challenged/ disabled people.
Draft SIA Report
February 2022
Development of Greenfield Port at Bhavanapadu, Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
P a g e | 5
2 LEGAL AND POLICY FRAMEWORK
The Legal and Policy Framework (LPD) and principles adopted for addressing resettlement issues in the
Project have been guided by the proposed legislation and policies of the GOI, the state Government of
Andhra Pradesh and in accordance with the principles of APMB. Prior to the preparation of the
Resettlement Plan, a detailed analysis of the proposed national and state policies was undertaken and an
entitlement matrix has been prepared for the entire program. The section below provides details of the
various national and state level legislations studied and their applicability within this framework. This
Resettlement Policy is prepared based on the review and analysis of all applicable legal and policy
frameworks of the country and state policy requirements. A summary of applicable acts and policies is
presented in the following paragraphs and the detailed policy review and comparison is provided in the
entitlement matrix.
2.1 Purpose and Objective
As per the Detailed Project Report (DPR) approximately 1010.00 Acres of land would be required for the
development of proposed Greenfield Port at Bhavanapadu, Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh. Out of
total land, approximately 320.05 acres of land shall be acquired from patta land (private land), 234.44
acres from salt pan land, 122.06 acres from coastal belt land, 66.54 acres from revenue land, 2.99 acres
from forest land, 79.00 acre from waste land and 184.92 acres required for external rail and road
connectivity. While the patta land shall be acquired as per RFCTLARR-2013 and RFCTLARR (Andhra
Pradesh Amendment) Act 2018, the salt land, revenue land, coastal belt land and forest land shall be
transferred from respective government department. In addition, the habitation of village Mulapeta and
Pathlingadu have been proposed to be displaced and relocated with workable R&R Plan and all basic
amenities.
The impacts of the project will not be limited to the land acquisition but will also affect and displace
people residing and/ or operating their petty business or other activities from the structures that are
falling in Mulapeta and Pathlingadu villages. Thus, the project will cause both physical and economic
impacts. Therefore, improvements on land will be impacted leading to relocation, disruption of shelter
and business, loss of livelihood, etc. The broad impacts likely to be caused due to the proposed project
are:
Loss of land (built-up, agricultural, open barren etc.);
Severance of land plots;
Residual land area becoming unviable;
Loss of structure (full or partial) of Titleholder, Squatter, Encroacher, Occupant;
Loss of other properties and assets such as boundary walls, hand pumps, tube wells, dug wells
etc.;
Displacement of owners and tenants of both residential and commercial entities;
Loss of livelihood of land owners and persons associated with land and business;
Loss of kiosk, work shed etc.;
Loss of trees, standing crops etc.;
Loss of common property resources such as religious places, graveyard, cremation places, water resources, village gates, etc.;
Draft SIA Report
February 2022
Development of Greenfield Port at Bhavanapadu, Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
P a g e | 6
Impacts on the livelihood of persons losing business units including commercial encroachers and squatters,
Disruption of social network during the construction period and access to resources etc.
The purpose and objectives of legal and policy framework are to ensure that compensation and
resettlement and rehabilitation aspects of the project are consistent with the national, state laws,
notifications and policies. Resettlement and rehabilitation activities are implemented in accordance with
the provisions laid down under this section.
2.2 Legal Framework for Land Acquisition, Resettlement and Rehabilitation
The following section outlines the laws, policy principles and procedures recommended to be followed
for land acquisition, compensation and resettlement and rehabilitation assistance for project affected
households/ persons (PAHs/PAPs).
The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (RFCTLARR, 2013);
The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement (Andhra Pradesh Amendment) Act, 2018;
Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Acts, 2006;
The Scheduled Castes and The Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989;
The Gazette of India, Extraordinary, S.O 425(E), Ministry of Rural Development Notification dated 9th February 2016;
The Provisions of the Panchayats (Extension to the Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996;
Right to Information Act, 2005; and
CSR activities under Companies Act, 2013.
The Resettlement and Rehabilitation policy is based on the fundamental principle that the project
affected persons should improve their socio-economic conditions after the implementation of the project
and also share the benefits of the project. The resettlements and rehabilitation principles are as under:
2.2.1 The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and
Resettlement Act, 2013 (RFCTLARR, 2013)
This Act repeals the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and is applicable to all states in India. RFCTLARR, 2013 is
a first national/central law that addresses land acquisition and rehabilitation and resettlement. This Act
provides enhanced compensation as compared to earlier LA Act of 1894 and resettlement & rehabilitation
assistance. It provides enhanced compensation (factor of 2 in rural areas and a factor of 1 in urban areas).
The Act lays down procedures for providing resettlement & rehabilitation assistance, fair compensation
for the affected families (and not just the titleholders) due to land acquisition, rehabilitation, and
resettlement. Some of the key features include the following: (i) Preliminary investigations/preparation
of Social Impact Assessment (SIA) and prepare a Social Impact Management Plan (SIMP). (ii) Preliminary
notification stating: project/ public purpose; reasons necessitating land acquisition; summary of SIA; and
particulars of the Administrator appointed for the purpose of rehabilitation and resettlement; receipt of
objections and hearing after the approval of SIA and within 12 months from the date of SIA approval; (iii)
Preparation of Rehabilitation and Resettlement scheme and its declaration by the District Collector after
Draft SIA Report
February 2022
Development of Greenfield Port at Bhavanapadu, Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
P a g e | 7
the same is approved by the Commissioner-Rehabilitation and Resettlement; (iv) Public notice and award
of compensation and R&R assistances by District Collector (DC) within a period of twelve months from
the date of the award publication.
2.2.1.1 The objectives of this Act are as follows:
To minimize displacement and to promote, as far as possible, non-displacing or least displacing alternatives;
To ensure adequate rehabilitation package and expeditious implementation of the rehabilitation process with the active participation of the affected families;
To ensure that special care is taken especially for protecting the rights of the members of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes and to create obligations on the State for their treatment with concern and sensitivity;
To provide a better standard of living, making concerted efforts for providing sustainable income to the affected families;
To integrate rehabilitation concerns into the development planning and implementation process; and
Where displacement is because of land acquisition, to facilitate the harmonious relationship between the requiring body and affected families through mutual cooperation.
2.2.1.2 The salient features of the RFCTLARR 2013 has been summarized below:
i. The Act provides for land acquisition as well as rehabilitation and resettlement. It replaces the
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and National Rehabilitation and Resettlement Policy, 2007.
ii. The act provides for the baseline for compensation to be multiplied by a factor of 1 or 2 for urban
and rural areas.
iii. Social Impact Assessment is a key requirement; the Social Impact Assessment report shall be
examined by an independent multi-disciplinary expert group, which will also include social
science and rehabilitation experts; SIA is exempted in Andhra Pradesh under section 3 of
RFCTLARR (Andhra Pradesh Amendment) Act 2018. In Andhra Pradesh land acquisition is being
done through direct negotiation and entering an agreement with land owner by Competent
Authority for Land Acquisition under Andhra Pradesh RFCTLARR (Andhra Pradesh Amendment)
Act, 2018.
iv. The affected communities shall be duly informed and consulted at each stage, including public
hearings in the affected areas for social impact assessment, wide dissemination of the details of
the survey to be conducted for R&R plan.
v. Compensation in rural areas would be calculated by multiplying market value by 2 and adding
assets attached to the land or building and adding a solatium. In urban areas it would be market
value plus assets attached to the land and solatium.
vi. The Collector shall take possession of land only after ensuring that full payment of compensation
as well as rehabilitation and resettlement entitlements are paid or tendered to the entitled
persons; families will not be displaced from land till their alternative R&R sites are ready for
occupation.
vii. The benefits to be offered to the affected families include; land-for-land, to the extent
Government land would be available in the resettlement areas; preference for employment in
the project to at least one person from each nuclear family subject to the availability of vacancies
and suitability of the affected person; training and capacity building for taking up suitable jobs
and for self-employment; preference to groups of cooperatives of the affected persons in the
allotment of other economic opportunities in or around the project site; wage employment to
Draft SIA Report
February 2022
Development of Greenfield Port at Bhavanapadu, Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
P a g e | 8
the willing affected persons in the construction work in the project; housing benefits including
houses to the landless affected families in both rural and urban areas and other benefits.
viii. Financial support to the affected families for construction of cattle sheds, shops and working
sheds; transportation costs, temporary and transitional accommodation and comprehensive
infrastructural facilities and amenities in the resettlement area including education, healthcare,
drinking water, roads, electricity, sanitation, religious activities, cattle grazing and community
resources, etc.
ix. Special provision for the STs and SCs include preference in land-for-land; a Tribal Development
Plan (TDP) for settling land rights due, restoring titles of the Scheduled Tribes as well as the
Scheduled Castes on the alienated land; community consultations; upfront payment of one-third
of the compensation amounts the affected families initially as first instalment; payment of an
additional twenty-five percent i.e. relocated outside district. Rehabilitation and resettlement
benefits to which they are entitled in monetary terms along with a one-time entitlement of fifty
thousand rupees.
x. For ensuring transparency, provision has been made for mandatory dissemination of information
on displacement, rehabilitation, and resettlement, with names of the affected persons and
details of the rehabilitation packages. Such information shall be placed in the public domain on
the Internet as well as shared with the concerned Gram Sabha and Panchayat, etc. by the project
authorities.
xi. No income tax shall be levied, and no stamp duty shall be charged on any amount that accrues
to an individual because of the provisions of the new law.
xii. The final award will include damage to any standing crops and trees which might have been
harmed due to the process of acquisition (including the preliminary inspection).
2.2.1.3 The important Schedules and Sections of RFCTLARR 2013 are presented in the Table below:
Table 2.1: Important Schedules and Sections of RFCTLARR 2013
S. No. Schedule/Section Descriptions
Schedules
1 The First Schedule Compensation for Land Owners
2 The Second Schedule Elements of Rehabilitation and Resettlement Entitlements for all the
affected families (both land owners and the families whose livelihood is
primarily dependent on land acquired) in addition to those provided in
the first schedule.
3 The Third Schedule Provision of Infrastructural Amenities
4 The Fourth Schedule List of enactments regulating LA and R&R
Sections
5 Section 4 Preparation of SIA Study (within a period of 6 months from the date of its
commencements)
6 Section 5 A public hearing for SIA
7 Section 6 Publication of SIA study
8 Section 7 Appraisal of SIA report by an expert group. Recommendation to be made
by the expert group in 2 months from the date of its constitution
9 Section 8 Examinations of proposals for LA and SIA report by appropriate
Government.
10 Section 9 Exemption from SIA (invoking the urgency provisions U/s 40
Draft SIA Report
February 2022
Development of Greenfield Port at Bhavanapadu, Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
P a g e | 9
S. No. Schedule/Section Descriptions
11 Section 10 Special provisions to safeguard food security (not applicable in case of
projects that are linear in nature- Railways, Highways, MDR, irrigations
canals, power lines etc.)
12 Section 11 Publications of preliminary notification and power of officers (to be
issued within 12 months from the date of appraisal of SIA report
submitted by the expert group U/s 7).
13 Section 12 A preliminary survey of land and power of officers to carry out a survey
14 Section 13 Payment for damage
15 Section 14 Lapse of SIA report (notification U/s 11 to be issued within 12 months
from the date of appraisal of the report). Appropriate Government may
extend the period of 12 months justifying the circumstances in writing.
16 Section 15 Hearing of objections (within 60 days from the date of publication of
preliminary notification U/s 11).
17 Section 19 Publication of declaration and summary of Rehabilitation &
Resettlement.
18 Section 25 Period within which award to be made (12 months from the date of
publications of the declarations U/s 19). In case no award is made within
the period the entire process of LA shall lapse.
19 Section 26 Determination of market value of land by Collector.
20 Section 27 Determination of amount of compensation.
21 Section 30 Award of solatium and interest @12% to be paid in every case.
2.2.1.4 Summary of RFCTLARR 2013
Social Impact Assessment is a pre-requisite before publishing a preliminary notification under sub-section (1) of section 11 for initiating the land acquisition process.
The notification issued under sub-section (1) of section 11 shall contain a statement on the nature of the public purpose involved, reasons necessitating the displacement of affected persons, summary of the Social Impact Assessment Report and particulars of the Administrator appointed for the purposes of rehabilitation and resettlement under section 43.
However, provisions under section 10 (dealing with food security) are exempted in case of projects that are linear in nature including railways.
The time period for completing the SIA - from the issuance of notification under sub-section (1) of section 4 is 6 months. The time period required for evaluation of SIA report by Expert Group is 2 months. Overall time required for SIA and completing other formalities before publishing a preliminary notification under section 11, RFCTLARR Act 2013 is one year.
Land acquired under this act shall vest in the name of acquiring agency.
The time required for land acquisition including SIA report is a minimum of two (2) years.
Compensation and rehabilitation and resettlement assistance as per Schedule I & II of RFCTLARR Act, 2013.
2.2.2 Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and
Resettlement (Andhra Pradesh Amendment) Act, 2018.
Followings are the salient features of this Act:
i. This Act was published in first time on the 30th May, 2018 in the Andhra Pradesh Gazette for
general information and deemed to have come into effect on 1st January 2014.
Draft SIA Report
February 2022
Development of Greenfield Port at Bhavanapadu, Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
P a g e | 10
ii. Section 3 of this Act states that provisions of Chapter II and Chapter III of RFCTLARR 2013
(hereinafter referred to as Principal Act) shall not be applicable to certain projects such as:
(a) Such Projects vital to national security or defence of India and every part thereof, including
preparation for defence or defence production.
(b) Rural Infrastructure including electrification.
(c) Affordable housing and housing for the poor people.
(d) Industrial Corridor set up by the State Government and its undertakings (in which case the land
shall be acquired up to one kilometer on both sides of designated railway lines or roads for such
industrial corridor).
(e) Infrastructure Projects, including projects under Public-Private Partnership where the ownership
of the land continues to vest with the Government.
iii. As per Section 4 of this Act, after Section 23 of Principal Act following sub-sections has been
inserted:
(a) Section 23A: If the Collector is satisfied that all the persons interested in the land who appears
before him have agreed in writing on the matters to be included in the award of the Collector in
the form prescribed, he may, without making further enquiry, make an award according to the
terms of such agreement.
(b) The determination of compensation for any land under sub-section (1) shall not in any way affect
the determination of compensation in respect of other lands in the same locality or elsewhere in
accordance with the other provisions of this Act.
iv. Section 5 (Voluntary Acquisition of Land) of this Act states that in Principal Act, in sub-section (2)
of Section 24 following amendment has been made:
(a) In existing proviso, for expression “Where an award has been made” the expression “where the
said award has been made 5 years or more prior to the commencement of this Act” shall be
substituted.
v. Section 6 of this Act states that in the Principal Act, after Chapter-IV, the Chapter IVA has been
inserted. As per the provision made under this section:
(a) As per this section, State Government or its Authorized Office will enter into an agreement with the willing land owner to sell the land in favour of the State for the matters specified therein in a prescribed form.
(b) The State Government or its Authorized Office shall pass an order in terms of agreement under this amendment for acquisition, and substance of the order shall be notified in the Gazette. On such publication of notification, the title, ownership and all interests of the land owner who enters into agreement, shall vest with the State, free from all encumbrances.
(c) If any family, other than the family of the land owner who entered into an agreement, is affected by the acquisition of land under this section, the State Government shall pay a lump-sum amount towards rehabilitation and resettlement, if any, as prescribed in the rules framed hereunder.
vi. Section 7 (Payment of Lump-sum amount by State Government): Under this section, Section 31A
has been inserted in the Principal Act. Under this amendment, whenever the land is to be
acquired for any projects as notified in Section 10A, it shall be competent for the State
Government to pay such lump sum amount as may be prescribed in the rules in lieu of
Rehabilitation and Resettlement.
vii. Section 8 of this amendment states that if any legal authority find that the money has been paid
wrongly to any person under this Act, the State Government or its Authorized person or Collector
shall recover the same as arrears of land revenue.
viii. Under Section 9 of this Act, in the Principal Act, in Section 46, in Sub-section (6), in the
Explanation, in clause (b), the word “any person other than” has been omitted.
Draft SIA Report
February 2022
Development of Greenfield Port at Bhavanapadu, Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
P a g e | 11
2.2.3 The Gazette of India, Extraordinary, S.O 425(E), Ministry of Rural Development Notification
dated 9th February 2016
In exercise of the powers conferred by column no. 3 of serial no. 2 of the First Schedule read with
subsection (2) of Section 30 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition,
Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (No. 30 of 2013), the Central Government, hereby, notifies
that in case of rural areas, the factor by which the market value is to be multiplied shall be 2.00 (two).
2.2.4 The Provisions of the Panchayats (Extension to the Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996
This Act, commonly known as PESA Act, 1996, extending the benefits of the 73rd Constitutional
Amendment to the Schedule V Areas of the country. This Act accords statutory status to the Gram Sabhas
in Schedule V areas with wide-ranging powers and authority to protect the economic, political and cultural
interest of indigenous peoples. The Act has recognized the prevailing traditional practices and customary
laws besides providing the management and control of all the natural resources - land, water, and forest
in the hands of people living in the Schedule Areas. The Act empowers people in the tribal areas through
self-governance. As per PESA, the Gram Sabha will be involved in approval of development plans and
programs, all decisions related to land acquisition as well as rehabilitation of affected persons. Important
provisions of the PESA 1996 are:
Gram Sabha shall safeguard and preserve the traditions and customs of the people, their cultural identity, community resources and the customary mode of dispute resolution.
Gram Sabha shall be responsible for approval of plans, programs, and projects for social and economic development.
Gram Sabha shall be responsible for the identification or selection of persons as beneficiaries under the development programs.
Consultation with Panchayat prior to land acquisition and Rehabilitation & Resettlement activities in the scheduled areas.
Endows ownership of minor forest produces (MFPs) to Panchayats.
Gram Sabha has the power to prevent alienation of land in Scheduled areas and to take appropriate action to restore any unlawfully alienated land of Scheduled Tribes (STs).
Provision of Land Acquisition is mentioned in section 4(i) of PESA Act, 1996. The Gram Sabha or the
Panchayats at the appropriate level shall be consulted before making the acquisition of land in the
Scheduled Areas for development projects and before re-settling or rehabilitating persons affected by
such projects in the Scheduled Areas; the actual planning and implementation of the projects in the
Scheduled Areas shall be coordinated at the State level.
Recognizing the special needs of the STs, the Constitution of India has made certain special safeguards to
protect the interest of these indigenous communities from all possible exploitation and injustice. The Fifth
Schedule is the constitutional provision with reference to the administration and development of the
Scheduled Areas and Scheduled Tribes in India. The Schedule has been framed to protect of the rights of
the tribal peoples on their land, forest and water as their natural rights. This provides for the
administration and control of Scheduled Areas and Scheduled Tribes. The proposed project Greenfield
Port Project at Bhavanapadu does not fall in any of Schedule V area. Hence, this Act is not applicable for
this project.
Draft SIA Report
February 2022
Development of Greenfield Port at Bhavanapadu, Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
P a g e | 12
2.2.5 The Scheduled Tribes and other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act
2006.
The Act is applicable in case the proposed Greenfield Port Project comes under forest areas inhabited by
tribal or traditional forest dwelling community. This law protects their traditional livelihood rights and
community rights over forest resources and commons.
The Scheduled Tribes and other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006,
recognizes and vests the forest rights and occupation in forest land to Scheduled Tribes and other
traditional forest dwellers who have been residing in such forests for generations but whose rights are
not recorded.
This Act is for members or community of the Scheduled Tribes who primarily reside in forests or forest
lands for their livelihood, including Scheduled Tribe pastoralist communities or the members or
community of the Scheduled Tribes who have been residing in the forest for 75 years.
The Government of India (GoI) recognizes and vests forest rights with forest dwelling STs, where they are
declared as STs, and other traditional forest dwellers. The Act provides a detailed list of rights to ST and
forest dwellers. These rights can be broadly divided into the following:
Title rights (ownership)- Refers to land that is being cultivated by tribal or forest dwellers as on December 13, 2005, subject to a maximum of 4 hectares;
Ownership is only for land that is being cultivated by the concerned family as on that date, meaning that no new lands are granted;
User rights- Refers to minor forest produce (also including ownership), to grazing areas, ponds for fishing, to pastoralist routes, etc.
Relief and development rights- Refers to rehabilitation in case of illegal eviction or forced displacement and to basic amenities, subject to restrictions for forest protection;
Forest management rights - Refers to protect forests and wildlife;
Rights to indigenous knowledge - Refers to biodiversity and community right to intellectual property and traditional knowledge related to biodiversity and cultural diversity; and
Traditional rights- Refers to any other traditional rights enjoyed by forest dwellers except the right of hunting or trapping or extracting any part of any wild animal.
Authority and Procedure for Vesting of Forest Rights: The Gram Sabhas (GS) will be the authority for
determining the nature and extent of individual or community forest rights.
2.2.6 The Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989
The communities like Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs) are socio-economically excluded
community and therefore more vulnerable to exploitation and atrocities caused by dominant community.
To prevent various forms of atrocities this law was enacted by the Parliament in 1989. This is a stringent
Act and the offenses under this Act are cognizable and non-bail able. In the process of possible
resettlement– voluntary or involuntary due to Port Project utmost care will be taken that any action or
practice does contravene any provisions in the Act. Some of the atrocities specified in the Act are forcing
an SC/ST person to drink or eat any inedible or obnoxious substances, dumping excreta, waste water,
carcasses or any other obnoxious substances in his/her premises or neighbourhood; forcibly removing
clothes; parading naked or with painted face; wrongfully occupying or cultivating any land owned by or
Draft SIA Report
February 2022
Development of Greenfield Port at Bhavanapadu, Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
P a g e | 13
allotted to SC/ST; compelling or enticing him to do begging, bonded labour, forcing or intimidating to take
certain decision; instituting false, malicious, vexatious suit or criminal/legal proceeding against SC/ST
person; intentionally insulting or intimidating with intent to humiliate in any place within public view;
using derogatory language against SC/ST person; outraging the modesty of or committing rape on SC/ST
woman; corrupting or fouling any sources of water used by members of SC/ST; and denying SC/ST people
his right of passage and causing him to leave his house, village or other place of residence.
2.2.7 Right to Information Act, 2005
The Act provides for setting out the practical regime of right to information for citizens to secure access
to information under the control of public authorities, in order to promote transparency and
accountability in the working of every public authority, the constitution of a Central Information
Commission and State Information Commissions and for matters connected therewith or incidental
thereto.
Only citizens can apply for information,
All public authorities are answerable under this Act,
Nature of the information must be relevant to the administration of the State,
Applicant need not provide reasons,
The information must be disseminated within 30 days,
Reasons for rejection of an application to be provided,
Provision of First Appellate Authority and the Second Appellate Authority,
The limitation to file and dispose of the appeals,
Information is one which is already recorded in official records and published, and
Information requested should not relate to any exempted matter under the Act.
2.2.8 CSR activities under Companies Act 2013
As per Companies Act (2013), companies meeting financial criteria laid down in the Act are required to
fulfill the Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) mandate and spend 2% of their net profits on CSR activities
broadly specified in Schedule VII of the Act. The Rules “Companies (Corporate Social Responsibility Policy)
Rules, 2014” came into force since 1st April 2014. Companies meeting the following criteria during any of
last 3 financial years needs to undertake CSR activity:
The net worth of more than INR 500 Crores, or
Turn over more than INR 1000 Crores, or
Net profit of more than INR 5 Crores.
Types of activities permitted as per Schedule VII of Companies Act is has been presented in the Table
below:
Table 2.2: Types of Activities as per Scheduled VII of Companies Act
S. No. Categories List of Activities
1. Category-I Eradication of extreme hunger and poverty.
Supplementing government schemes like- mid-day meal by corporate through additional nutrition.
Draft SIA Report
February 2022
Development of Greenfield Port at Bhavanapadu, Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
P a g e | 14
S. No. Categories List of Activities
Promoting health care including preventive health care and sanitation including contribution to the Swachh Bharat Kosh set-up by the Central Government for the promotion of sanitation.
Providing medical aid.
Making safe drinking water available.
2. Category-II Promoting education of masses.
Special education and employment enhancing vocation skills especially among children, women, elderly and the differently abled.
Livelihood enhancement projects.
3. Category-III Promoting gender equality.
Women Empowerment.
Setting up homes and hostels for women and orphans.
Setting up old age homes, day care centers and such other facilities for senior citizens.
Measures for reducing inequalities faced by socially and economically backward groups.
4. Category-IV Environmental Sustainability.
Ecological balance and Protection of flora and fauna.
Animal welfare, agroforestry, and conservation of natural resources.
Maintaining quality of soil, air and water including contribution to the Clean Ganga Fund setup by the Central Government for rejuvenation of river Ganga.
Water Sprinklers for agricultural purpose.
5. Category-V Protection of natural heritage, art, and culture.
Restoration of buildings and sites of historical importance and works of art.
Setting up public libraries.
Promotion and development of traditional arts and handicrafts.
6. Category-VI Measures for the benefit of:
Armed-forces veterans,
War widows and their dependents.
7. Category-VII Training to promote:
Rural sports,
Nationally recognized sports,
Paralympic sports, and
Olympic sports.
8. Category-VIII Contribution to Prime Minister's Relief Fund and Other Such State and Central Funds.
Draft SIA Report
February 2022
Development of Greenfield Port at Bhavanapadu, Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
P a g e | 15
S. No. Categories List of Activities
Any other fund setup by the Central Government for socio-economic development and relief and welfare of the scheduled castes, the scheduled tribes, other backward classes, minorities and women.
9. Category-IX Contributions or funds provided to technology incubators located within academic institutions, which are approved by Central Government
10. Category-X Rural Development projects.
Rural Electrifications.
Enhancing rural connectivity.
Installation of solar lights.
Infrastructure development.
11. Category-XI Slum Area Development.
Housing for Economically Weaker Sections.
2.3 Applicable Social Safeguard Policy for proposed Greenfield Port Project at Bhavanapadu
The social safeguard policies applicable for the proposed project are summarized in the Table below:
S.
No.
Acts, Notifications and
Policies
Relevant to the Project Applicability
1. RFCTLARR 2013 The Act lays down procedures for land acquisition
and providing resettlement & rehabilitation
assistance.
Applicable
2. Right to Fair
Compensation and
Transparency in Land
Acquisition,
Rehabilitation and
Resettlement (Andhra
Pradesh Amendment)
Act, 2018
This Act was published in first time on the 30th
May, 2018 in the Andhra Pradesh Gazette for
general information and deemed to have come into
effect on 1st January 2014.
As per Section 3 of this Act Chapter II and Chapter
III of RFCTLARR 2013 are not applicable for this
Project.
As per this Act, State Government or its Authorized
Office will enter into an agreement with the willing
land owner to sell the land in favour of the State for
the matters specified therein in a prescribed form.
Applicable
3. The Gazette of India,
Extraordinary, S.O
425(E), Ministry of
Rural Development
Notification dated 9th
February 2016
Notifies that market value of land shall be
multiplied by a factor of 2 in the case of rural areas.
Applicable
Draft SIA Report
February 2022
Development of Greenfield Port at Bhavanapadu, Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
P a g e | 16
2.4 Entitlement Matrix
Compensation for the lost assets to all displaced persons will be paid on the basis of replacement cost.
Resettlement assistance for lost income and livelihoods will be provided to both title holders and non-
title holders. Special resettlement and rehabilitation measures will be made available to the “Vulnerable
Group” comprises of DPs living below poverty line (BPL), SC, ST, women headed households, the elderly
and the disabled. An Entitlement Matrix has been formulated, which recognizes and lists various types of
losses resulting out of the project and specific compensation and resettlement packages. Entitlement
Matrix presented in Table below:
Table 2.3: Entitlement Matrix
S. No. Impact Category Entitlements Implementation Guidelines
PART I. TITLE HOLDERS-Compensation for Loss of Private Property
1 Loss of Land
(agricultural,
homestead,
commercial or
otherwise)
1.1 Compensation for land at
Replacement Cost or Land for
land, where feasible
Land will be acquired by the
competent authority in accordance
with the provisions of RFCTLARR
Act, 2013 and Andhra Pradesh
RFCTLARR (Andhra Pradesh
Amendment) Act, 2018.
Replacement cost for Land will be,
higher of (i) market value as per
Indian Stamp Act, 1899 for the
registration of sale deed or
agreements to sell, in the area
where land is situated; or
(ii)average sale price for similar
type of land, situated in the nearest
village or nearest vicinity area,
ascertained from the highest 50%
of sale deeds of the preceding
3years; or (iii) consented amount
paid for PPPs or private companies.
Plus 100%solatium and
12%interest from date of
notification to award.
The multiplier factor adopted by
State Government for land in rural
area, based on the distance from
urban area to the affected area,
will be applied.
Draft SIA Report
February 2022
Development of Greenfield Port at Bhavanapadu, Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
P a g e | 17
S. No. Impact Category Entitlements Implementation Guidelines
In case of severance of land, house,
manufactory or other building,
As per Section 94(1), the whole
land and /or structure shall be
acquired, if the owner so desires.
2 Loss of Structure
(house, shop,
building or
immovable
property or assets
attached to the
land)
2.1 Compensation at replacement
cost
The market value of structures and
other immovable properties will be
determined by Competent
Authority for Land Acquisition
(CALA) on the basis of relevant
Schedule of rates (SR) as on date
without depreciation and
consultation with Roads and
Building Department.
Plus 100% solatium
For partly affected structures, the
DP will have the option of –
claiming compensation for the
entire structure, if the remaining
portion is unviable.
PART II. REHABILITATION AND RESETTLEMENT- Both Land Owners and Families Whose Livelihood is
Primarily Dependent on Land Acquired
3 Loss of land 3.1 Employment to at least one
member per affected family in
the project or arrange for a job
in such other project as may be
required after providing
suitable training and skill
development in the required
field and at a rate not lower
than the minimum wages
provided for in any other law
for the time being in force.
Or
One-time payment of
Rs.5,00,000/-for each affected
household.
Or
Draft SIA Report
February 2022
Development of Greenfield Port at Bhavanapadu, Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
P a g e | 18
S. No. Impact Category Entitlements Implementation Guidelines
Annuity policy that shall pay Rs,
2000/- per month for 20 years
with appropriate indexation to
CPITAL
3.2 Monthly subsistence allowance
of Rs, 3000/-per month for a
period of one year to affected
households who require to
relocate due to the project
3.3 Transportation assistance of Rs.
50,000/- for affected
households who require to
relocate due to the project
3.4 One-time assistance of Rs.
25,000/- to all those who loss a
cattle shed
3.5 One time Resettlement
Allowance of Rs, 50,000/- for
affected household who have
to relocate
3.6 Additional onetime assistance
of Rs, 50,000/-to scheduled
caste and scheduled tribe
families who are displaced from
scheduled areas and who
require to relocate due to the
project.
4 Loss of Residence 4.1 An alternative house for those
who have to relocate, as per IAY
specification in rural areas and
constructed house/flat of
minimum 50sq.m. in urban
areas or cash in lieu of house if
opted (the cash in lieu of house
will be Rs, 70,000/-in the line
with Gol IAY standards in rural
areas and Rs, 1,50,000 in case
of urban areas) , for those who
do not have any homestead
land and who have been
Stamp Duty and registration
charges will be borne by the project
in case of new houses or sites.
Draft SIA Report
February 2022
Development of Greenfield Port at Bhavanapadu, Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
P a g e | 19
S. No. Impact Category Entitlements Implementation Guidelines
residing in the affected areas
continuously for a minimum
period of 3years
4.2 Employment to at least one
member per affected family in
the project or arrange for a job
in such other project as may be
required after providing
suitable training and skill
development in the required
field and at a rate not lower
than the minimum wages
provided for any other law for
the time being in force.
Or
One Time payment of Rs,
5,00,000/- for each affected
household.
Or
Annuity policy that shall pay Rs,
2000/- per month or 20 years
with appropriate indexation to
CPITAL.
4.3 Monthly subsistence allowance
of Rs, 3000/- per month for a
period of one year to affected
households who require to
locate due to the project.
4.4 Transportation assistance of Rs.
50,000/- for affected
households who require to
relocate due to the project.
4.5 One-time assistance of Rs.
25,000/-to all those who lose a
cattle shed.
4.6 One-time assistance of Rs.
25,000/- for each affected
family of an artisan or self-
employed and who has to
relocate
Draft SIA Report
February 2022
Development of Greenfield Port at Bhavanapadu, Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
P a g e | 20
S. No. Impact Category Entitlements Implementation Guidelines
4.7 One-time Resettlement
Allowance of Rs. 50,000/-for
affected household who have
to relocate
4.8 Additional onetime assistance
of Rs. 50,000/-to scheduled
caste and scheduled tribe
families who are displaced from
scheduled areas and who
require to relocate due to the
project.
4.9 Right to salvage affected
materials.
5 Loss of shop /trade
/commercial
structure
5.1 Employment to at least one
number per affected family in
the project or arrange for a job
in such other project as may be
required after providing
suitable training and skill
development in the required
field and at a rate not lower
than the minimum wages
provided for in any other law.
Or
One-time Payment of Rs.
5,00,000/-for each affected
household
Or
Annuity policy that shall pay Rs.
2000/-per month for 20 years
with appropriate indexation to
CPITAL
5.2 Monthly subsistence allowance
of Rs. 3000/- per month for a
period of one year to affected
household who require to
relocate due to the project
5.3 Transportation assistance of Rs.
50,000/-for affected household
Draft SIA Report
February 2022
Development of Greenfield Port at Bhavanapadu, Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
P a g e | 21
S. No. Impact Category Entitlements Implementation Guidelines
who require to relocate due to
the project.
5.4 One-time assistance of Rs.
25,000/-for each affected
family of an artisan or self-
employed or small trader and
who has to relocate.
5.5 One-time Resettlement
Allowance of Rs. 50,000/-for
affected household who have
to relocate.
5.6 Additional onetime assistance
of Rs. 50,000/-to scheduled
caste and scheduled tribe
families who are displaced from
scheduled areas and who
require to relocate due- to the
project
5.7 Right to salvage affected
materials.
PART III. IMPACT TO SQUATTERS/ENCROACHERS-
6 Impact of
Squatters
6.1
6.1.1
Loss of House
Compensation at scheduled
rates without depreciation for
structure with 1-month notice
to demolish the affected
structure.
Only those directly affected
squatters who live there will be
eligible for all assistance.
Structure owners within project
boundary/ Government lands who
do not live there and have rented
out the structure will be provided
compensation for structure and no
other assistance will be provided to
them. The occupier (squatter-
tenant) will be eligible for other
assistance.
6.1.2 Right to salvage the affected
materials.
6.1.3 House construction grant of Rs.
70,000/-for all those who have
to relocate and who do not
have a house.
Additional house site grants of
Rs. 50,000 to those who do not
have a house site
6.1.4 One-time subsistence
allowance of Rs. 18,000/-
Draft SIA Report
February 2022
Development of Greenfield Port at Bhavanapadu, Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
P a g e | 22
S. No. Impact Category Entitlements Implementation Guidelines
6.1.5 One time Shifting assistance of
Rs. 10,000/-
6.2
6.2.1
Loss of shop
Compensation at scheduled
rates without depreciation for
structure with one-month
notice to demolish affected
structure.
Only those directly affected
squatters who do business there
will be eligible for all assistance.
Structure owners in Government
lands who do not live there and
have rented out the structure will
be provided compensation for
structure and no other assistance
will be provided to them.
6.2.2 Right to salvage the affected
materials.
6.2.3 One-time rehabilitation grants
of Rs. 20,000/-for
reconstruction of affected
shop.
6.2.4 One time subsistence
allowance of Rs.18,000/-
The occupier (squatter-tenant) will
be eligible for other assistance.
6.2.5 Shifting time assistance of Rs.
10,000/-
6.3
6.3.1
Kiosks/ Street Vendors
1-month advance notice to
relocate to nearby place for
continuance of economic
activity.
APMB and the implementation
support NGO/ agency will consult
such DPs and assess the
requirement of subsistence
allowance and rehabilitation grant.
6.3.2 For temporary loss of livelihood
during construction period, a
monthly subsistence allowance
of Rs. 3000/-will be paid for the
duration of disruption to
livelihood, but not exceeding 3-
Months.
6.3.3 If relocation to nearby place
and continuance of economic
activity in the same place is not
possible, then one-time
rehabilitation grants of Rs.
18,000/-
6.4
6.4.1
Cultivation
2-month notice to harvest
standing crops or market value
Draft SIA Report
February 2022
Development of Greenfield Port at Bhavanapadu, Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
P a g e | 23
S. No. Impact Category Entitlements Implementation Guidelines
of compensation for standing
crops.
7 Impact to
Encroachers
7.1
7.1.1
Cultivation
2-month notice to harvest
standing crops or market value
of compensation for standing
crops, if notice is not given
Market value for the loss of
standing crops will be decided by
the CALA in consultation with the
agriculture or Horticulture
Department
7.2
7.2.1
Structure
1-month notice to demolish the
encroached structure
7.2.2 Compensation at scheduled
rates without depreciation for
the affected portion of the
structure
The value of commercial structure
and other immovable properties
will be determined by CALA on the
basis of relevant scheduled rates
(SR) as on date without
depreciation
PART IV. IMPACT TO VULNERABLE HOUSEHOLD
8 Vulnerable
Household
8.1 Training for skill development.
This assistance includes cost of
training and financial assistance
for travel/conveyance and
food.
One adult member of the affected
household, whose livelihood is
affected, will be entitled for skill
development.
8.2 One-time assistance of Rs.
25,000/-to DHs who have to
relocate.
NGO will identify the number of
eligible vulnerable displaced
persons during joint verification
and shall update the RP and will
conduct training need assessment
in consultations with the DPs so as
to develop appropriate training
programmes suitable to the DPs
skill, education and the region.
Suitable trainers or local resources
will be identified by APMB and
NGO in consultation with local
training institutes/NSDC.
PART V. IMPACT DURING CIVIL WORKS
Draft SIA Report
February 2022
Development of Greenfield Port at Bhavanapadu, Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
P a g e | 24
S. No. Impact Category Entitlements Implementation Guidelines
9 Impact to structure
/assets/ tree/
crops
9.1 The contractor is liable to pay
damages to assets/tree/crops
in privet/public land, caused
due to civil works
APMB will ensure compliance
10 Use of private land 10.1 The contractor should obtain
prior written consent from the
landowner and pay mutually
agreed rental for use of private
land for storage of material or
movement of vehicles and
machinery or diversion of
traffic during civil works
PART VI. COMMON PROPERTY RESOURCES
11 Impact to common
property resources
such as places of
worship,
community
buildings, schools,
etc.
11.1 Relocation or restoration, if
feasible, or cash compensation
at replacement cost.
12 Utilities such as
water supply,
electricity, etc.
12.1 Will be relocated and services
restored prior to
commencement of civil works
The APMB will ensure that utilities
are relocated prior to
commencement of civil works in
accordance with the civil works
schedule.
PART VII. UNFORSEEN IMPACT
Unforeseen Impacts encountered during implementation will be addressed in accordance with the
principles of RFCTLARR2013/ Andhra Pradesh RFCTLARR (Andhra Pradesh Amendment) Act, 2018. In
addition to the all entitlements given in the non-tribal area, Tribal Development Plan will be prepared
for development assistance of the affected tribal communities in course of the competent authorities’
community and human development plans covering the following aspects:
a. Contribution of existing tribal development and/or human development plans
b. Assistance of competent authorities to prepare new tribal development plans and implement the
plans
c. Development of alternate fuel, fodder and non-timber forest produce resources on non-forest lands
Draft SIA Report
February 2022
Development of Greenfield Port at Bhavanapadu, Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
P a g e | 25
3 APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY
3.1 Approach
The initial approach includes several discussions with the officials of APMB along with reconnaissance
visits to the site. The study approach has a combination of Review of available related data and
documents, Data collection from secondary sources and primary data collection through reconnaissance
surveys, Consultations with the stakeholders.
A combination of qualitative and quantitative approach shall be adopted for the Social Impact
Assessment. Socio-economic survey of representative sample households shall be conducted for
collection of information on current status of their living and magnitude of probable impact. The
qualitative research approach through Consultations and Focus Group Discussions with the primary
stakeholders shall also be adopted to gain a deeper understanding of the project impact. These
techniques also facilitate the involvement of the project affected people in the project and provide their
suggestions.
3.2 Methodology
The various steps shall be adopted to conduct Social Impact Assessment which are described in the Table
3.1 below:
Table 3.1: Steps taken to prepare SIA & RAP Reports
STEP: 1 Mobilization
Meeting and discussions with APMB
Reconnaissance Survey/ Site visit
STEP: 2 Desk Research
Review of relevant data and documents
Study of Detailed Project Report, Layout Drawing, Acts & Policies, Guidelines and other
administrative documents
Collection of data/ information from Secondary Sources
Formulation of Data Collection instruments from primary sources
STEP: 3 Field Studies
Site Visit for verifying the impact zone on ground and identify the impact zones/ areas
Selection of Enumerators and Supervisors and their field training
(It consisted of detail discussions on Questionnaires and Data collection methods, sampling
process, identification of project households etc.)
Discussions with local community and local people about the projects, its benefits and
adversities.
Conduct of Socio-Economic Survey
Conduct of Public/ Community Consultations
Focused Group Discussions
STEP: 4 Data Processing & Data Analysis
Scrutiny of filled-in-Questionnaires
Coding, data entry & verification
Tabulation of data
Generation of trial and final tables and
Data analysis to prepare output tables
Draft SIA Report
February 2022
Development of Greenfield Port at Bhavanapadu, Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
P a g e | 26
STEP: 5 Preparation of R&R Estimates
R&R Estimate shall be carried out after Census and Socio-economic Survey
STEP: 6 Generation of Reports
Generation of Draft SIA & RAP report
Final SIA & RAP reports after incorporating the comments and clarifications of Client.
Conventionally, the Census Survey shall be conducted for all affected families and sample Socio-economic
survey shall be conducted for approximately 25 percent of the Project Affected Families.
3.2.1 Public Consultations
Public Consultations/Focused Group Discussion shall be conducted with the Project Affected Persons
(PAPs) and relevant stakeholders at various locations in the project area. During public consultations
issues related to design of the project, benefits, land acquisition, compensation, income restoration,
employment generation, grievance redress, road access, safety etc. shall be discussed.
The Stakeholders consulted are a) primary stakeholders, who are affected persons and b) secondary
stakeholders, who are officials of Panchayats and local institutions. The consultations included the
following entities/ institutions as stakeholders.
Project Affected People
General Public
Head/ Sarpanch of the villages
Draft SIA Report
February 2022
Development of Greenfield Port at Bhavanapadu, Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
P a g e | 27
4 SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE OF THE STUDY AREA
4.1 Project Impact Area
The proposed Development of Greenfield Port at Bhavanapadu falls under Srikakulam district in the State
of Andhra Pradesh. The Primary Project Impact Area (PIA) is identified as direct project impact area that
is the villages under which proposed project falls. The project may also have major influence in Srikakulam
District (secondary PIA) and Andhra Pradesh state (tertiary PIA).
The socio-economic profiles of the secondary and tertiary project influence area are based on Census
2011 and other secondary official sources of information. The primary data through Socio-economic
surveys (25%) of the likely project affected households has been collected through stratified sampling
method in the month of November 2021.
4.2 Tertiary Project Impact Area (PIA): The State of Andhra Pradesh
Demography:
The total population of Andhra Pradesh is 4,93,86,799 in which 2,47,38,068 are male and 2,46,48,731 are
female. In terms of population, Andhra Pradesh is the tenth largest state in the Country accounting for
4.10% of the total population of the country, as per 2011 Census. The decadal growth of population is
9.21% during 2001-11, lower than the All-India's growth rate of 17.70%. With 13 districts and with a
geographical area of 1,62,970 SqKm, Andhra Pradesh ranks as the 8th largest State in the country.
Situated in a tropical region, the state has the 2nd longest coastline in the country with a length of 974
km.
The density of population for Andhra Pradesh as per 2011 Census is 304 persons per square kilometer, as
against 382 persons per square kilometer at all India level in 2011. The sex ratio in the state was up from
983 in 2001 to 997 in 2011 and is higher than all India figure of 943.
Literacy:
The literacy rate of the State is 67.41% in 2011 as compared to 62.07 percent in 2001. The literacy rate of
the State is lower than the all India literacy rate of 72.98 percent. Literacy in Andhra Pradesh increased
over 37 percentage points from 29.94 percent in 1981 to 67.35 percent in 2011. Female literacy rate has
gone up from 52.72% in 2001 to 59.96% in 2011.
Economic Status of the State
The sectoral growth rates of GVA (Grass Value Added) of Andhra Pradesh for 2020-21 at constant (2011-
12) price are Agriculture: 4.16%, Industry: (-) 3.26% and Services sector: (-) 6.71%. The Per Capita Income
(NSDP) of Andhra Pradesh at current prices has registered a growth of 1.03% as it increased from Rs.
1,68,480 in 2019-20 (FRE) to Rs. 170,215 in 2020-21, Whereas the Per Capita Income of All India has
decreased from Rs. 1,34,186 in 2019-20 to Rs. 1,27,768 (AE) in 2020-21.
The revenue composition of the state in FY 2019-20 indicate that Rs. 57,601 crores accrued from Own Tax
sources, Rs.3315 crores from Own Non-Tax sources and Rs. 50,957 crores of Central Transfers.
Draft SIA Report
February 2022
Development of Greenfield Port at Bhavanapadu, Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
P a g e | 28
Connectivity and Transportation:
The total R&B Road Network (excluding National Highways) in the State as on December 2020 was 46225
Km, comprising 13500 Kms of State Highways, 32725 Kms of Major district road and Rural roads. The
density of National Highways is 13.72 Km per lakh population (2011) in the State as against all India
average of 10.89 km and in terms of area coverage, a length of 41.46 km is available for every 1,000 Sq.
km in the State as against all India average of 40.00 km/1,000Sq.km.
There are 38 National Highways in the state of Andhra Pradesh covering a length of 6943.69 Km. Out of
6943.69 Km National Highways in the state, a total length of 2524.15 Km is under the control of NHAI,
833.24 Km with MoRT&H, PIU and 3586.30 Km under the control of State PWD. Under Panchayat Raj
Engineering Department, the total length of the rural roads as on 01.04.2020 in the state is 79,636 KMs.
Currently there are 6 operational Airports in Andhra Pradesh which connect with major cities. Domestic
Airports: Rajahmundry, Kadapa, Orvakallu at Kurnool and Puttaparthi (Pvt) and International Airports:
Vishakhapatnam, Vijayawada and Tirupati. The Orvakallu Airport got both DGCA license and BCAS
approval for public use and the APADCL working towards bring the commercial Airlines to start the
operations and also actively pursuing to bring the Flight Training Organization.
4.3 Secondary Project Impact Area (PIA): Srikakulam District
Srikakulam District is the extreme Northeastern District of Andhra Pradesh situated within the geographic
Co-ordinates of 180 -20’ and 190 - 10’ of Northern latitude and 830 -50’ and 840 -50’ of Eastern longitude.
The district is bounded on the North by Rayagada, Gajapati & Ganjam districts of Odisha State, West by
Vizianagaram district while South & East by Bay of Bengal. The total area of the district is 5,837 square
kilometres. The district is comprising into 3 revenue divisions (Palakonda, Srikakulam and Tekkali), 38
revenue Mandals, 1865 revenue villages and 1091 village Panchayats. The district has also 1 Municipal
Corporation (Srikakuram) 3 municipalities (Amudalavalasa, Ichchapuram & Palasa-Kasibugga) and 2 Nagar
Panchayats (Polakonda and Rajam).
4.3.1 Demographic Profile of the District
As per Census of India 2011, Srikakulam district had population of 27,03,114, of which male and female
were 13,41,738 (49.64%) and 13,61,376 (50.36%) respectively. The total proportion of population
compounded into 6,81,330 households creating an average household size of approximately 4 persons
per household. The gender ration of the district is 1015 females per 1000 males. Approximately 83.84%
people reside in rural environment while 16.16% people reside in urban environment. There was a growth
of 6.38 percent in the population compared to population of Census 2001. In the previous census of India
2001, Srikakulam District recorded increase of 9.33 percent to its population compared to 1991.
Table 4.1: Demographic Profile of the District
Location Household Population Male Female Gender Ratio Population
(Below 6 Years)
Rural 572382 2266411 1126888 1139523 1011.21 238331
Urban 108948 436703 214850 221853 1032.59 42706
Total 681330 2703114 1341738 1361376 1014.64 281037
Source: Census of India 2011
Draft SIA Report
February 2022
Development of Greenfield Port at Bhavanapadu, Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
P a g e | 29
The overall density of population in the district is 463 persons per sq.km and is above the State average
of 308. Among the urban areas Srikakulam town recorded highest 7,125 persons per sq.km.
4.3.2 Culture and Religion
The population of Srikakulam mostly consists of people belonging to the Telugu community. However,
residents from other communities following different faiths like Islam, Jainism, Buddhism and Christianity
also cohabit in the district. Table 4.2 gives a description of religion wise population distribution in the
district. Around 98.66% of the populations are Hindus, 0.33% are Muslims, 0.70% are Christians, 0.01%
are Sikhs, and approximately 0.29% people did not reveal their religion.
Table 4.2: Religion wise distribution of Population
Religion Population Percentage
Hindu 2666950 98.66
Muslim 9025 0.33
Christian 18879 0.70
Sikh 193 0.01
Buddhist 77 0.00
Jain 160 0.01
Other religions and
persuasions 106 0.00
Religion not stated 7724 0.29
Total 2703114 100.00
Source: Census of India 2011
The official language of Srikakulam is Telugu. Srikakulam is renowned for its indigenous arts and crafts,
brass products such as bells for temples, cooking utensils, flower pots, lamps and other household items.
Being in the coastal region of Andhra Pradesh, Srikakulam enjoys a rich variety of seafood as well as rice
and dal as its staple diet.
4.3.3 Literacy Rate
An average literacy rate of the Srikakulam district is 61.74% while the literacy rate of Male is 71.61% with
respect to the male population and female is 52.08% with respect to the female population. There is a
gender gap of approximately 19.53% between literacy rate of male and female.
Separating for urban and rural areas of the district, the literacy rate worked out to 78.36% and 58.51%
respectively. Again within the urban areas, male and female literacy rates separating worked out to
85.97% and 71.06%. For the rural population the male and female literacy rates worked out to 68.86%
and 48.35%.
4.3.4 Social Stratification in the District
The total SC population in the district is 2,55,664 which is 9.46% of the total population while it is 9.48%
in rural area and 9.35% in Urban area. The ST population in the district is 1,66,118 which is 6.15%% of the
total population while it is 7.08% in Rural area and 1.30% in Urban area.
Table 4.3: Social Stratification in the District
S. No. Particulars Scheduled Caste Scheduled Tribes
Number Percentage Number Percentage
1 Rural 214824 9.48 160438 7.08
2 Urban 40840 9.35 5680 1.30
Draft SIA Report
February 2022
Development of Greenfield Port at Bhavanapadu, Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
P a g e | 30
S. No. Particulars Scheduled Caste Scheduled Tribes
Number Percentage Number Percentage
3 Total 255664 9.46 166118 6.15
Source: Census of India 2011
4.3.5 Work Participation Rate
The work participation rate for total workers is defined as percentage of total workers to total population.
The total worker’s participation rate in Srikakulam district is 47.7%. Again the percentage of Main workers
to total workers stands at 72.6%. Among the main workers as seen for the percentage of workers of 2011
over 2001, is increased. The female worker’s participation has gone up from 38.4% in 2001 Census to
38.5% at 2011 Census.
The total worker’s participation rate separately for males and females in the rural areas is 57.6% and
42.1% respectively. Against corresponding figures for urban areas is 54.8% and 19.7% respectively.
The principal crops are bifurcated into Cereals, Pulses, Oilseeds and other crops. Of which under cereals
Rice, Bajra and Raagi are the prominent crops of the district. Green gram, Horse Gram and Black gram are
the prominent Pulses; Groundnut, Sesamum, and Coconut are the prominent oil-seeds of the district.
Cotton, Sugarcane and cashewnut are the other prominent crops; Mangoes, Acid Lime, Behndi, Brinjal,
Green leafy vegetables and Tomatoes are the important vegetables and fruits of the district. The table
below indicates the details of the principal crops for the decade.
4.4 Primary Project Impact Area
This section provides an understanding of the demographic profile of the villages in the project affected
area, the social groups present, the livelihood profile of the community. The purpose of this section is to
allow for an increased understanding of the key issues identified as well as identify areas of intervention
in future scenarios. As per the reconnaissance survey and Census of India 2011, there are six numbers of
hamlets namely Kothalingudu, Pathalingudu, Matchilesam Sunnapalle, Reddikasunnapalle, Mulapeta and
Vishnuchakram are coming under Rajapuram village. Out of these six hamlets, the settlement of Mulapeta
and Pathalingudu are impacted and attract Rehabilitation & Resettlement due to the development of
Proposed Bhavanapadu Greenfield Port. Hence, 100% Census and 25% Socio-economic Survey shall be
conducted of PAFs and Resettlement Action Plan shall be prepared and implemented as per the Right to
Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation & Resettlement (Andhra Pradesh
Amendment) Act, 2018 and RFCTLARR Act, 2013.
4.4.1 Demographic Profile
Details of demographic particulars of affected village Rajapuram is presented in Table 4.4. There are 2
numbers of habitations i.e. Mulapeta and Pathalingudu under Rajapuram village are affected due to
acquisition of land and displacement for the project. The total population of the affected villages are
compounded into 783 households and total population is 3316 in which 1657 (49.97%) are males and
1659 (50.03%) are females. The population of the people below 6 years’ age group is 439 (13.24%). The
average gender ratio of the affected village is 1001 females per thousand males.
Draft SIA Report
February 2022
Development of Greenfield Port at Bhavanapadu, Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
P a g e | 31
Table 4.4: Demographic Profile of the Affected Villages
S.
No. Village Household
Population
Total Male Female Below 6
Years
Gender
Ratio
1 Rajapuram 783 3316 1657 1659 439 101
Total 783 3316 1657 1659 439 101
Source: Census of India 2011
4.4.2 Social Stratification
With reference to the Table 4.5, only 56 (1.69%) people of Scheduled Castes are dwelling in the village
Rajapuram. As per Census of India 2011, there no any Scheduled Tribes reported in the village Rajapuram.
Table 4.5: Details of SC and ST Population
S.
No. Village
Scheduled Caste (SC) Scheduled Tribes
Total Male Female % of SC Total Male Female % of ST
1 Rajapuram 56 24 32 1.69 0 0 0 0
Total 56 24 32 1.69 0 0 0 0
Source: Census of India 2011
4.4.3 Literacy Rate
The average literacy rate of the affected village is 50.40% (1450) in which male’s literacy rate is 60.07%
with respect to the male population as against 40.97% for females with respect to the female population.
There is a gender gap of 19.10% between literacy rate of male and female.
Table 4.6: Literacy Rate of the Affected Villages
S.
No. Village
Number of Literates Literacy Rate Gender Gap
Total Male Female Total Male Female
1 Rajapuram 1450 853 597 50.40 60.07 40.97 19.10
Total 1450 853 597 50.40 60.07 40.97 19.10
Source: Census of India 2011
4.4.4 Work Participation Rate
The total number of workers in the affected village are 1860 and the WPR is 56.09% in which male are
57.75% with respect to the male population and females are 54.43% with respect to female population.
There are 3.32% of gender gap between work participation rate of male and female.
Table 4.7: Work Participation Rate of the Affected Villages
S. No. Village
Total Worker Work Participation Rate
(WPR)
Gender Gap
Total Male Female Total Male Female
1 Rajapuram 1860 957 903 56.09 57.75 54.43 3.32
Total 1860 957 903 56.09 57.75 54.43 3.32
Source: Census of India 2011
4.4.5 Main Worker and Marginal Worker
Table 4.8 presents details of Main Workers and Marginal Workers. Out of total working population 1358
(73.01%) are Main Workers while 502 (26.99%) are Marginal Workers.
Draft SIA Report
February 2022
Development of Greenfield Port at Bhavanapadu, Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
P a g e | 32
Table 4.8: Main Worker and Marginal Worker
S.
No. Village
Main Worker Marginal Worker
Total Male Female % Total Male Female %
1 Rajapuram 1358 876 482 73.01 502 81 421 26.99
Total 1358 876 482 73.01 502 81 421 26.99
Source: Census of India 2011
4.4.6 Categorization of Main Worker
Further the Main Worker has been categorized into four working categories i.e. Cultivator, Agricultural
Labour, Household Industry Worker and Other Worker. As per Table 4.9, 54.79% of total Main Worker
are engaged in Agricultural Labour followed by Other Workers with 24.37%, Cultivator with 20.47% and
Household Industry Workers with 0.37%.
Table 4.9: Categorization of Main Worker
S.
No. Village
Main
Worker
Cultivator Agricultural
Labour
Household
Industry Worker Other Worker
Nos. % Nos. % Nos. % Nos. %
1 Rajapuram 1358 278 20.47 744 54.79 5 0.37 331 24.37
Total 1358 278 20.47 744 54.79 5 0.37 331 24.37
Source: Census of India 2011
4.4.7 Categorization of Marginal Worker
Marginal Workers have also been categorized into four working categories i.e. Cultivator, Agricultural
Labour, Household Industry Worker and Other Worker. As per Table 4.10, 78.09% of total Marginal
Worker are engaged in Agricultural Labour followed by Other Workers with 14.94%, Cultivator with 6.57%
and Household Industry Workers with 0.40% only.
Table 4.10: Categorization of Marginal Worker
S.
No. Village
Marginal
Worker
Cultivator Agricultural
Labour
Household
Industry Worker Other Worker
Nos. % Nos. % Nos. % Nos. %
1 Rajapuram 502 33 6.57 392 78.09 2 0.40 75 14.94
Total 502 33 6.57 392 78.09 2 0.40 75 14.94
Source: Census of India 2011
Hence, it is evident that livelihood of the most of the people of the affected villages are depend on
Agriculture and Other Workers.
4.4.8 Social Infrastructure
Educational Infrastructure in the Project Village
There are 6 nos. of Government Primary School and 2 nos. of Govt. Middle School are running in
Rajapuram village and its hamlets. For Secondary, Sr. Secondary and Higher Education people generally
visit Khaspanaupada, Tekkali and Srikakulam that is approximately up to 55 km. from project village.
Draft SIA Report
February 2022
Development of Greenfield Port at Bhavanapadu, Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
P a g e | 33
Table 4.11: Educational Infrastructure
S. No.
Village
Go
vt. P
rim
ary
Sch
oo
l
(No
.)
Go
vt. M
idd
le S
cho
ol
(No
.)
Go
vt. S
eco
nd
ary
Sch
oo
l (N
o.)
Pri
vate
Se
con
dar
y
Sch
oo
l (N
o.)
Go
vt. S
en
ior
Seco
nd
ary
& P
vt
Sen
ior
Seco
nd
ary)
(No
.)
Go
vt. A
rts
and
Sci
en
ce
De
gre
e C
olle
ge (
No
.)
Go
vt. E
ngi
ne
eri
ng
Co
llege
(N
o.)
Go
vt. M
ed
icin
e
Co
llege
(N
o.)
Go
vt. M
anag
em
en
t
Inst
itu
te (
No
.)
1 Rajapuram 6 2
Total 6 2
Source: Census of India 2011
Health Infrastructure in the Project Village
As per Census of India 2011, there are no any government health facility available in Rajapuram village.
4.5 Socio-economic Survey of Project Impact Area
Socio-economic survey of 25% of Project Affected Families (PAFs) has been conducted with a stratified
sampling method in the village of Mulapeta and Pathlingadu in the month of November 2021. During the
survey approximately 90 household samples have been collected and analyzed. The outcome of socio-
economic survey has been presented in the following sub-sections:
4.5.1 Household Composition of PAFs
As per the data presented in the Table 4.12, total population of sample PAFS are 281 in which 245 people
comes under 10 to 60 age group, 24 people comes below 10 years of age group and 12 people comes
above 60 years of age group. Further, out of the total population 153 (54.45%) are male and 128 (45.55%)
are female. The gender ratio of the sample population is 836 females per thousand males.
Further, an average household size of the family is 3.12 person per family and all the families come under
the categories of Nuclear Family.
Table 4.12: Household Composition of the People of Affected Villages
S. No. Age Group Male Female Total
1 10 to 60 Age Group 130 115 245
2 Children (Below 10 Years) 13 11 24
3 Aged (Above 60 years) 10 2 12
Total 153 128 281
Source: VSPL’s Socio-economic Survey November 2021
4.5.2 Social Stratification and Religion of PAFs
The data collected from Socio-economic survey reveals that almost all the sample families belong to the
Other Backwards Castes (OBC). No SC, ST and General Castes families reported during survey.
Further, in the village Pathlingadu and Mulapeta, people belong to the Hindu religion.
Draft SIA Report
February 2022
Development of Greenfield Port at Bhavanapadu, Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
P a g e | 34
4.5.3 Land Holding Pattern of the PAFs
The data presented in Table 4.13 reveals that approximately 48.89% of PAFs have agricultural land
between 0.5 to 1 acres, 24.44% have agricultural land between 1 acre to 2 acres, 6.67% have between 3
to 5 acres and 20.00% do not possess any agricultural land i.e. they are landless. The average land holding
size of PAFs are up to 1 acre per families.
Table 4.13: Land Holding Pattern of PAFs
S. No Land Holding Size (in Acre) Frequency Percentage
1 0.5 Acre to 1 Acres 44 48.89
2 >1 Acres to 2 Acres 22 24.44
3 >2 Acres to 5 Acres 6 6.67
4 >5 Acres to 10 0 0.00
5 Land Less 18 20.00
Total 90 100.00
Source: VSPL’s Socio-economic Survey November 2021
4.5.4 Occupational Pattern of the People of PAFs
The Table 4.14 presents occupational pattern of the people of sample PAFs. The Work Participation Rate
(WPR) of the people of the affected families are 53.38%. Majority of the occupation of the people of the
study area are either farmer or Labour. Approximately 35.33% people engaged in labour work followed
by agricultural work with 32.00%, agricultural labour with 25.33% service with 4.67%, fishing with 1.33%
and business with 0.33% only.
Table 4.14: Occupational Pattern of the People of affected Villages
S. No. Occupation Frequency Percentage
1 Agriculture 48 32.00
2 Agricultural Labour 38 25.33
3 Business 2 1.33
4 Fishing 2 1.33
5 Labour 53 35.33
6 Service 7 4.67
Total 150 100.00
Source: VSPL’s Socio-economic Survey February 2021
4.5.5 Income Pattern of the PAFs
As per the data presented in Table 4.15, approximately 31.11% families come between Rs. 60,000/- to
Rs. 1,00,000/- annual income group, 25.56% come between Rs. 1,00,000/- to Rs. 1,50,000/- annual
income group, 20% families come between Rs. 25,000/- to Rs. 600,000/- annual income group, 18.89%
families come between 1,50,000 to 3,00,000 annual income group and 4.44% families come above Rs.
3,00,000/- annual income group. Therefore, it is evident that most of the families of affected villages have
their annual income between Rs. 50,000/ to Rs. 1,50,000/. An average income of the people of the
affected families are approximately Rs. 1,20,000/- per year. Further, based on the analysis made above
and outcome of public consultations, most of the people of the affected villages are depend on agriculture
or labour work for their livelihood. Jwar, makka, pulses, cotton, chillies are the major corps grown in this
region.
Draft SIA Report
February 2022
Development of Greenfield Port at Bhavanapadu, Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
P a g e | 35
Table 4.15: Income Pattern of the PAFs
S. No. Annual Income (in INR) Frequency Percentage
1 25,000 to 60,000 18 20.00
2 60,001 to 1,00,000 28 31.11
3 1,00,001 to 1,50,000 23 25.56
4 1,50,001 to 3,00,000 17 18.89
5 Above 3,00,001 4 4.44
Total 90 100.00
Source: VSPL’s Socio-economic Survey November 2021
4.5.6 Expenditure Pattern of the PAFs
The table below explain the annual expenditure pattern of the people of the study area. Out of the total
samples collected, approximately 55.56% people expend between Rs. 50,000 to Rs. 1,00,000 to fulfil their
daily needs like food, cooking fuel, cloths, health, education, communication, social functions and
agriculture etc. In the same way, approximately 33.33% people expend between Rs. 15,000 to Rs. 50,000
and 10% people expends between Rs. 1,00,000 to Rs. 1,50,000.
Table 4.16: Expenditure Pattern of the PAFs
S. No. Annual Expenditure (in INR) Frequency Percentage
1 15,000 to 50,000 30 33.33
2 50,001 to 1,00,000 50 55.56
3 1,00,001 to 1,50,000 10 11.11
4 1,50,001 to 3,00,000 0 0.00
Total 90 100.00
Source: VSPL’s Socio-economic Survey November 2021
Based on the income and expenditure analysis it is concluded that the people of the study area comes
under low income group.
4.5.7 Possession of Durable Consumer Items
Table 4.17 presents status of durable consumer items possessed by PAFs. As per the table below 94.44%
sample families (90 PAFs) possess Mobile phone, 15.56% have Bicycle, 80.00% have Television, 1.11%
have Oven, 97.78% have LPG connections, 1.11% have Computer, 18.89% have Refrigerator, 7.78% have
Washing Machine, 24.44% have Motor Cycle, 4.44% have Car and 2.22% family possess Air conditioner.
Table 4.17: Possession of Durable Consumer Items
S. No. Durable Consumer Item Frequency Percentage
1 Mobile 85 94.44
2 Bicycle 14 15.56
3 Television 72 80.00
4 Oven 1 1.11
5 LPG Connection 88 97.78
6 Computer 1 1.11
7 Refrigerator 17 18.89
8 Washing Machine 7 7.78
9 Motor Cycle 22 24.44
Draft SIA Report
February 2022
Development of Greenfield Port at Bhavanapadu, Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
P a g e | 36
S. No. Durable Consumer Item Frequency Percentage
10 Car 4 4.44
11 AC 2 2.22
Source: VSPL’s Socio-economic Survey November 2021
4.5.8 Status and Role of Women in Economic Activities
Table 4.18 presents role and status of women in different economic and household activities. Out of the
total sample (90 PAFs) collected approximately 84.44% families accept that the female member of their
families engage in agricultural labour. In the same way, 44.44% families accept that female member of
their families are engage in household work, 13.33% non-agricultural labour, 11.11% in trade and
business, 6.67% in cultivation, 4.44% in service, 4.44% in household industry, 4.44% in collection and sell
of forest products and 3.33% accepts that the female member of their families engage in allied activities.
Table 4.18: Engagement of Women in Economic Activities
S. No. Particular Frequency Percentage
1 Cultivation 6 6.67
2 Allied Activities 3 3.33
3 Collection and sell of forest Product 4 4.44
4 Trade and Business 10 11.11
5 Agricultural Labour 76 84.44
6 Non-Agricultural Labour 12 13.33
7 HH Industry 4 4.44
8 Service 4 4.44
9 Household Work 40 44.44
10 Others 6 6.67
Source: VSPL’s Socio-economic Survey November 2021
4.5.9 Role of Women in Decision Making
Out of the total sample collected approximately 96.56% PAFs accept that they take the advice of female
members also in daily household matters and jointly they take decision in different household matters.
Table 4.19: Role of Women in Decision Making of Households Matter
S. No. Particulars Frequency Percentage
1 Financial Matters 12 13.33
2 Education of Child 76 84.44
3 Health Care of Child 83 92.22
4 Purchase of Assets 17 18.89
5 Day to day activities 74 82.22
6 Social Function and Marriage 22 24.44
7 Others 7 7.78
Source: VSPL’s Socio-economic Survey November 2021
Draft SIA Report
February 2022
Development of Greenfield Port at Bhavanapadu, Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
P a g e | 37
When it was asked that in which matters they allow their female members to have any says in decision
making; approximately 92.22% PAFs accept that they allow female members to have any says in health
care of child, 84.44% allow in education of child, 82.22% allow in day to day activities, 24.44% allow in
social function and marriage, 18.89% in purchase of assets, 13.33% in financial matters, 7.78% in others
household matters.
Hence, it may be concluded that the people of FAFs allow their female member to have any say in health
care of child, education of child and day to day activities. In these activities, role of female member is
significant and important. Whether as the role of female member is limited and insignificance in financial
matters, purchase of assets and social functions & marriage.
Draft SIA Report
February 2022
Development of Greenfield Port at Bhavanapadu, Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
P a g e | 38
5 SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
The assessment of the primary project impact is based on the reconnaissance and socio-economic survey
of the proposed project site, data collected from different govt. official websites, Census of India 2021
and revenue department. The detailed Census and socio-economic survey including
consultations/focused group discussion/individual interview of the project affected villages/settlements
shall be conducted during Draft EIA Stage and on the basis of primary and secondary data Resettlement
Action Plan shall be prepared and implemented by APMB as per the applicable Act.
5.1 Impact on Land
As per the Detailed Project Report approximately 1010 Acres of land would be required for the
development of proposed Bhavanapadu Greenfield Port at Rajapuram village, Santhabomali Mandal,
Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh. Out of total land, approximately 320.05 acres of land shall be
acquired from patta land (private land), 234.44 acres from salt pan land, 122.06 acres from Coastal Belt
land, 66.54 acres from revenue land and 79.00 acres from waste land. In addition, approximately 184.92
acres of land shall also be required for external rail and road connectivity. While government land shall
be transferred from its respective department by APMB, the patta (private) land shall be acquired by
revenue department as per RFCTLARR (Andhra Pradesh Amendment) Act 2018. The details of land
proposed to be acquired has been summarized in Table 5.1.
Table 5.1: Details of Land to be Acquired/Transferred for the Proposed Project
S. No. Type of Land Area (in Acre) Percentage
1 Coastal Belt Land 122.06 12.09
2 Forest Land 2.99 0.30
3 Revenue Land 66.54 6.59
4 Patta Land 320.05 31.69
5 Salt Pan Land 234.44 23.21
6 Waste Land 79.00 7.82
7 Rail Connectivity (External) 27.83 2.76
8 Road Connectivity (External) 127.09 15.55
Total Land 1010.00 100.00
Source: Detailed Project Report
5.2 Impact on Settlement
As per Census of India 2011, total population of the Rajapuram village is 3316 and it is compounded into
783 households. As per the reconnaissance survey, socio-economic survey and Census of India, there are
six numbers of hamlets namely 1. Kothalingudu, 2. Pathalingudu, 3. Matchilesam Sunnapalle, 4.
Reddikasunnapalle, 5. Mulapeta and 6. Vishnuchakram are coming under Rajapuram village. Out of these
six hamlets, the settlement of Mulapeta and Pathalingudu are impacted and attract Rehabilitation &
Resettlement. Based on secondary data approximately 302 households in which 249 households in
Mulapeta and 53 households in Pathalingudu hamlets needs to be displaced due to the development of
Proposed Bhavanapadu Greenfield Port.
Draft SIA Report
February 2022
Development of Greenfield Port at Bhavanapadu, Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
P a g e | 39
To understand the socio-economic profile of the affected villages, a socio-economic survey of 25% of PAFs
has been conducted in the month of November 2021 and analyzed. Census survey for the same is under
progress and after getting the data, R&R Plan shall be prepared and shall be implemented by APMB as
per Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation & Resettlement
(Andhra Pradesh Amendment) Act, 2018 and RFCTLARR Act, 2013.
5.3 Rehabilitation and Resettlement Budget
Based on the findings of socio-economic survey outcomes and Census of India 2011, a tentative R&R
budget has been estimated. After completion of Census Survey, it shall be updated.
Table 5.2: Rehabilitation and Resettlement Budget
A. Land
S. No. Component Type of Land Unit Rate/Acre
Quantity Amount (Rs.)
1 Land Private Land 5,50,0002 320.05 17,60,27,500
2 Land for External Rail and Road Connectivity
Private Land 5,50,000 184.92 10,17,06,000
A1 Cost of Land Acre 320.0500 27,77,33,500
A2 Multiplication Factor 2 55,54,67,000
A3 100% solatium of Land Cost 55,54,67,000
Total Acquisition Cost of Land 1,11,09,34,000
B. Structure
S. No. Component Unit Unit Rate Quantity Amount (Rs)
1 Permanent Structures Sq.m 9,000.00 36240 32,61,60,000
2 Semi-permanent Structures
Sq.m 6,000.00 15100 9,06,00,000
3 Temporary Structures Sq.m 3,500.00 9060 3,17,10,000
B1 Cost of Structures 60400 44,84,70,000
B2 100% solatium of Total Structure Cost 44,84,70,000
Total Cost of Structure 89,69,40,000
C. CPR
S. No. Component Unit Unit Rate Quantity Amount (Rs)
1 School Nos. 25,00,000 2 50,00,000
2 Handpump Nos. 1,00,000 5 5,00,000
3 Bore-well Nos. 50,000 3 1,50,000
4 Community Sqm 20,000 1200 2,40,00,000
Total Cost of CPR 2,96,50,000
D. R&R
S. No. Component Unit Unit Rate Quantity Amount (Rs)
1 Employment Allowance
Affected Family
5,00,000 302 15,10,00,000
2 http://registration.ap.gov.in
Draft SIA Report
February 2022
Development of Greenfield Port at Bhavanapadu, Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
P a g e | 40
2 Shifting allowance Displaced Family
50,000 302 1,51,00,000
3 Resettlement Allowance
Affected Family 50,000 302 1,51,00,000
4 Subsistence allowance Displaced Family
36000 302 1,08,72,000
5 Additional Subsistence Allowance for vulnerable households
Vulnerable Family 50,000 140 70,00,000
6 Grant for Artisans, Small traders, Petty shops and Cattle sheds
Affected Artisans, Small Traders, Petty Shops and Cattle Sheds
25,000 250 62,50,000
Total 20,53,22,000
E. Implementation
S. No. Component Unit Unit Rate Quantity Amount (Rs)
1 Training of Affected Households
Affected Family
15,000 302 45,30,000
2 RP Implementation Agency
Agency 1,50,00,000 1 1,50,00,000
3 Monitoring and Evaluation Consultant
Consultant 45,00,000 1 45,00,000
4 Administrative Expenses
Displaced Family
10,00,000 1 10,00,000
5 Dissemination of Resettlement Plan etc.
Lumpsum 10,00,000 1 10,00,000
Total 2,60,30,000
F. Total R&R
S. No. Item Amount (Rs.)
1 Cost of Land 1,11,09,34,000
2 Cost of Structure 89,69,40,000
3 Cost of CPR Relocation & Enhancement 2,96,50,000
4 Cost of R&R Assistance 20,53,22,000
5 Cost of Implementation 2,60,30,000
G LA and R&R Cost 2,26,88,76,000
H Contingency @ 10% on G 22,68,87,600
I Total R&R Cost 2,49,57,63,600
Based on the above analysis, the total cost estimated for R&R is 249.57 Crore.
Draft SIA Report
February 2022
Development of Greenfield Port at Bhavanapadu, Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
P a g e | 41
6 GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL MECHANISM
There is a need for an efficient Grievance Redressal Mechanism, which will assist the PAFs in resolving
queries and complaints. Any disputes will be addressed through the grievance redressal mechanism.
Formation of Grievance Redressal Cell (GRC) is most important for grievance redressal and it is anticipated
that most, if not all grievances, are settled by the GRC. Detailed investigation will be undertaken which
may involve field investigation with the concerned PAFs. The GRC is expected to resolve the grievances
of the eligible persons within a stipulated time frame.
The GRC will continue to function, for the benefit of the PAFs, during the entire life of the project including
the defects liability period. The response time prescribed for the GRC is 15 days. The GRC will meet once
in a fortnight to expedite redressal of grievances.
People are not debarred from moving to the court for issues including those related to R&R Entitlement
and compensation for land. However, it is expected that the GRC will play a very crucial role in redressing
grievances of the PAFs and will help the implementation of the project as scheduled.
6.1 Constitution of Grievance Redressal Committee (GRC)
The committee will comprise of representatives of local NGOs; Sarpanch/President of the respective
villages; representative of women group, representative of squatters and vulnerable PAFs; line
department and affected persons especially women as well as the representative of respective District
Administration. Minimum participation of women in GRC should be 33%. At least two persons from each
group will be there in the GRC. The functions of the GRC will be:
To provide support for the PAFs on problems arising out of Land/ Property acquisition.
To record the grievances of the PAFs, categorizes and prioritize and solve them within a month.
To inform APMB of serious cases within an appropriate time frame; and
To report to the aggrieved parties about the development regarding their grievance and decision of APMB.
6.2 Operational Mechanism
It is proposed that GRC will meet regularly (at least once in 15 days) on a pre-fixed date (preferably on
first and third week of the month). The committee will look into the grievances of the people and will
assign the responsibilities to implement the decisions of the committee. The committee will deliver its
decision within a month of the case registration.
The mechanism will be based on proposed laws. The Grievance Redressal Cell (GRC) will be set up at site
level. Grievance not resolved amicably at the site level will be routed through NGO to the GRC. Arbitrator
may also be appointed for unresolved cases. Arbitrator will be selected by APMB.
The various queries, complaints and problems that are likely to be generated among the PAFs will
primarily relate to disputes of ownership of assets, identification of legal heirs of deceased property
owner and other non-land related issues.
Draft SIA Report
February 2022
Development of Greenfield Port at Bhavanapadu, Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
P a g e | 42
The APMB will act as Public Information Centres, which will be in possession of all documents relating to
the Project including compensation packages and grievance redressal procedures, and will provide any
information regarding compensation and grievance redressal.
6.3 Site Level Committees:
The first stage will be Site Level Committees (SLCs) and the NGOs. The PAFs will be encouraged to be part
of SLCs composed of:
Representatives of affected persons;
Panchayat members of the affected villages; and
NGO field worker
33% participation of women from affected families and full participation of women from the women headed households will also be encouraged.
The SLCs and the NGOs will meet at regular intervals as decided by the community, specifically for
grievance redressing purposes at a pre-decided date, time and place. The PAFs can be formally present in
these meetings and discuss their queries and grievances. At the community level, the committee will have
the power to resolve matters either by providing information or agreeing on a follow-up action. It may
also reject some grievances for not being legitimate. However, it will have to explain to the Project
Affected Person (PAP), the premise for not recording the grievance. Legitimate grievances, which the SLC
is unable to resolve, will be taken to the GRC, which will then take the necessary action after reviewing
the findings of a thorough investigation. The SLC will maintain a register of all queries and grievances, and
the subsequent action taken.
The PAFs will present their grievance, concerning compensation for structures / land and R&R assistance
to the District Level Committee (DLC)/NGO. The DLC and NGO will examine the grievance and where
required will review with District Revenue Officer (DRO) and will do utmost to reach an amicable
settlement to the satisfaction of the PAFs.
6.4 Role of APMB/EA Headquarters
The PAFs, who would not be satisfied with the decision of the GRC, will have the right to take the grievance
to the APMB/EA Head Office for its redressal. Failing the redressal of grievance at APMB/EA, the PAFs will
take the case to Arbitration. The Arbitrator(s) will be independent but appointed by APMB. Taking
grievances to arbitration and Judiciary will be avoided as far as possible and the NGO will make utmost
efforts at reconciliation at the GRC level.
Draft SIA Report
February 2022
Development of Greenfield Port at Bhavanapadu, Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
P a g e | 43
7 MONITORING AND EVALUATION
Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) is an essential activity of projects involving land acquisition, causing
displacement, impacting livelihood as it helps to make suitable changes if required during Resettlement
Action Plan (RAP) implementation and resolve problems faced by the PAPs. Periodic checking or
monitoring of various activities related to RAP implementation provides inputs to project proponent for
course correction and implementation. Assessment of resettlement effectiveness, impact, and
sustainability of R&R activities forms part of the evaluation. In other words, evaluation aims at assessing
whether the activities carried out have achieved their intended goals and purposes. Thus M&E of RAP
implementation is critical to measuring the project performance and fulfillment of project objectives.
The monitoring and evaluation of RAP implementation will ensure monitoring of key indicators of project
processes and compliance and evaluation of impact indicators. Monitoring will keep track of the
implementation processes and progress, achievement of targets, learning lessons and taking corrective
measures to deal with emerging issues.
7.1 Internal Monitoring and Reporting
The internal monitoring of RAP implementation will be the responsibility of Superintending Engineer (SE),
APMB at Kakinada, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh. This will help monitor project activities closely.
Internal monitoring will cover the physical and financial progress of RAP implementation including
resettlement activities. Monthly progress report submitted by RAP consultant will cover various aspects
of RAP implementation and resettlement activities and form the base for progress monitoring. Project
Manager/ Assistant Project Manager for concerned section/contract packages will update data on
monitoring indicators and submit a report to SE. Internal monitoring would enable APMB to assess
whether the due processes are being followed or not. It will also provide the necessary guidance and
inputs for suitable changes if required during the implementation. A list of indicators is presented below
in Table 7.1.
Table 7.1: Monitoring for RAP and Resettlement Activity Implementation
S. No. Indicator Scope Status Achievement
(in %)
Remarks
1 Private land area to be acquired (Ha)
2 Notification published u/s 10A of Andhra
Pradesh RFCTLARR (Amendment) Act, 2018
3 Consent award declared for landowners in
terms of land owners (No.)
4 Consent award declared for landowners in
terms of Area (Ha)
5 Compensation amount disbursed to land
owners (Rs.)
6 Compensation amount disbursed to land
owners (No.)
7 Possession of land area taken (Ha)
Draft SIA Report
February 2022
Development of Greenfield Port at Bhavanapadu, Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
P a g e | 44
S. No. Indicator Scope Status Achievement
(in %)
Remarks
8 Govt. land transferred (ha)
9 Forest land transferred (ha)
10 Verification of identified PAPs completed (No.)
11 PAPs added if any (who could not be
enumerated at the time of survey)
12 Valuation of affected properties completed
(No.)
13 Project-specific identity card prepared and
handed over to PAPs (No.)
14 Micro plan prepared and submitted for THs for
approvals to CPM Office (No.)
15 The micro plan approved by CPM Office (No.)
16 Approved Micro plan was given to PAPs (No.)
17 R&R assistance disbursed to PAPs (Rs.)
18 R&R assistance disbursed to PAPs (No.)
19 R&R assistances disbursed to PAPs (Title
Holders & Non-titleholders) - No.
20 Consultations held with local community
regarding relocation or rehabilitation of CPRs
(No.)
21 Estimate submitted for relocation/
rehabilitation of CPRs for approval
22 CPRs relocated/ rehabilitated (No.)
23 PAPs re-established their shops/ business (No.)
24 Consultations held regarding RAP
(dissemination of information, awareness
generation, entitlements) - No.
25 Consent provided by PAP for income
restoration training
26 PAPs actually receiving training for alternate
livelihood (No.)/ income restoration
27 PAPs able to start or get alternative
employment
28 PAP groups that took the benefit of setting up
the livelihood restoration unit provided under
the project
29 Grievance/ complaints brought to GRC for
redressal (No.)
30 GRC meeting held and cases resolved (No.)
Draft SIA Report
February 2022
Development of Greenfield Port at Bhavanapadu, Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
P a g e | 45
S. No. Indicator Scope Status Achievement
(in %)
Remarks
31 Consent provided by displaced families for self-
relocation to rental/ transitional
accommodation
32 Consent provided by displaced families for
assisted relocation to rental/ transitional
accommodation
33 No of families Shifted to rented / transitional
accommodation
34 No of families shifted to Resettlement sites
35 Structures dismantled (No.)
36 PAPs relocated (No.)
Monthly progress report covering above-mentioned indicators and progress of RAP and LRP
implementation of the project would be submitted by RAP consultant to APMB office by 10th of every
month. Based on the monthly report of RAP consultant, APMB site office will prepare a summary report
covering the progress of land acquisition in terms of area, consent award declared in terms of villages and
individual land owners, compensation and R&R amount awarded and disbursed etc. for submission to
APMB Head Quarter, Kakinada, East Godavari.
7.2 External Monitoring
External monitoring and evaluation shall be carried by a third-party agency that shall be hired by the
APMB before the start of the RAP implementation. The objectives of external monitoring are to assess
the project’s compliance with the stated legal and policy framework including disbursement of due
entitlements to PAPs. The monitoring would cover review of relevant documents, site visits, consultations
with PAPs, interactions with District Revenue Department, APMB site office & Head Office and other
concerned agencies (contractor, project control agencies etc.). Quarterly monitoring shall verify the
progress of the RAP implementation activities, identify issues, concerns, delays and reasons thereof,
problems faced in the implementation and recommend corrective measures for implementation.
Monitoring and Evaluation shall constitute the following:
Progress monitoring (physical and financial aspects);
Process monitoring (compliance with legal and policy framework and lessons learned);
Impact evaluation based on a sample survey and consultations; and
Thematic studies.
The monitoring and review of RAP implementation shall combine quantitative and qualitative data. The
results of the draft quarterly progress/monitoring report (QPR) shall be presented to APMB. Final QPR
shall be submitted incorporating the observation during the presentation. Summarizing, process
monitoring would enable APMB to assess whether the due processes are being followed or not, whereas
performance monitoring would mainly relate to achievement in measurable terms against the set targets.
Draft SIA Report
February 2022
Development of Greenfield Port at Bhavanapadu, Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
P a g e | 46
QPR will also provide the necessary guidance and inputs for any changes if required during the
implementation.
7.3 Evaluation and Reporting
The external agency engaged by APMB would conduct evaluation twice in a year during the RAP
implementation period. The first evaluation would be conducted after first 6 months of the RAP
implementation and it shall be repeated after every 6 months till the completion of RAP implementation.
The evaluation will be carried out under a set term of reference. It would focus on assessing whether the
overall objectives of the project are being met and will use the defined impact indicators as a basis for
evaluation. Specifically, the evaluation will assess: (i) The level of success (including the constraints and
barriers) in land acquisition programme, resettlement plan, income restoration of PAPs particularly those
who have been displaced from the project affected area and, (ii) the types of complaints/ grievances and
the success of grievance handling, etc. The evaluation study would involve both quantitative and
qualitative surveys and compare results before and after the implementation of the project. It will focus
on assessing whether the overall objectives of the project are being met and will use the defined impact
indicators as a basis for evaluation. The evaluation study would undertake the following but not limited
to:
Review monthly progress report submitted by RAP consultant and internal monitoring report
prepared by APMB site team;
Undertake consultations with PAPs to assess their point of view regarding the overall process;
Intensity and effectiveness of information dissemination regarding RAP implementation covering
eligibility of different categories of PAPs and various aspects of RAP implementation staff such as
frequency of interactions with PAPs, deployment of staff, quality of rapport maintained with
PAPs, capability of personnel, availability, behaviour, assistance provided to PAPs and satisfaction
level of PAPs with regard to work; and
Collect information about adequacy of distribution of awareness generation materials,
entitlements, distribution of identity cum entitlement card, adequacy of dissemination of
information, consultations meetings regarding eligibility and entitlements, alternatives and
relocation related issues, measurement and valuation of affected properties, understanding and
use of grievance procedure, disbursement of assistance, and other R&R related issues,
compliance of Legal and Policy Framework (LPF); and
Conduct sample survey (25% of PAPs) for making comparative analysis substantiated by
qualitative surveys and case studies, etc.
It may be noted that one of the key objectives of RAP implementation is an improvement of socio-
economic conditions of PAPs or at least restoration of socio-economic status of PAPs to the pre-project
level and hence it is important to assess the socio-economic status of PAPs after RAP implementation and
resettlement activities. An illustrative list of indicators is given in Table 2.2 which would be measured
against the baseline data collected for the preparation of RAP. The M&E agency would finally select the
indicators for the evaluation of the project depending upon the progress of R&R and resettlement
activities.
Draft SIA Report
February 2022
Development of Greenfield Port at Bhavanapadu, Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
P a g e | 47
Table 7.2: Impact Evaluation Indicator
S. No. Indicator Unit Before Project
Implementation
During/After RAP &
LRP Implementation
1 Sources of income of household
2 Monthly income of
family/household
3 Change in consumer durables and
materials assets owned
4 Ownership of personal transport
facilities
5 Occupation of head of household
and other members
6 Type of dwelling units
7 Number of earning
members/household
8 Monthly income of vulnerable
households
9 Family under debt
10 Size of loan
11 Land ownership of households
12 Households with various sizes of
land
13 Ownership/tenancy of dwelling
units (owner, encroacher,
squatter)
14 Status of vulnerable PAPs (BPL,
WHH, Disabled, Orphan, Landless,
Elderly persons above 65 years
without a dependent, SC, ST)
15 Access to water and sanitation
facilities
16 Migration for employment
17 Access to various facilities
18 Govt. scheme under which help/
benefits availed
7.4 Monitoring, Evaluation and Reporting Schedule
Monthly progress report covering the progress of RAP implementation including mobilization of staffs,
the opening of site offices etc. of the project would be submitted by RAP consultant to APMB by 10th of
every month. Internal monitoring report covering progress of land acquisition in terms of area, consent
Draft SIA Report
February 2022
Development of Greenfield Port at Bhavanapadu, Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
P a g e | 48
award declared in terms of villages and individual land owners, compensation and R&R amount awarded
and disbursed to all overall PAPs and vulnerable groups, grievance cases received (by type) and resolved,
shall be summarized by APMB site office team and submitted to APMB, Head Office for review and
necessary action (if required). RAP consultant will submit a completion report within one month after
completion of RAP activities. End term evaluation by third-party external agency will be conducted after
submission of RAP completion report.
Draft SIA Report
February 2022
Development of Greenfield Port at Bhavanapadu, Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
P a g e | 49
8 CONCLUSION
The proposed Greenfield Port at Bhavanapadu would see many industries establishing from multiple
sectors with many ancillary & satellite units boosting trade & commerce in an unprecedented way;
thereby bringing in the synergies of development to the state like never before. It will, as a consequence
generates huge direct and indirect employment including the local people, substantially improve the
living standards and generally act as a gateway to prosperity of the entire region.
The proposed project shall provide approximately 10,000 direct and indirect employment opportunity
during project construction and operation period. During project construction phase, approximately 7500
employment opportunity shall be generated. Local people shall be given priority on the basis of their skill
and education.
Andhra Pradesh has the second longest coastline in India, covering a length of over 974 km stretching
between Srikakulam and Nellore with deep draft coastal waters. A network of 14 notified non-major ports
and one major port provides strong potential for the State to become India's gateway to the world,
especially the Asian and South East Asian region. Andhra Pradesh has the unique advantage of having
deep draft ports – Visakhapatnam, Gangavaram and Krishnapatnam and to develop many other similar
ports to enable for attracting bulk cargo from East and South East Asian economies. To reap the potential
benefits and position of Andhra Pradesh as the India's Gateway to the World, the Government is
integrating the development of ports, industrial clusters and, hinterland and efficient evacuation systems
through road, rail, inland and coastal waterways.
Thus, on the basis of available secondary data, reconnaissance and socio-economic survey and the
analysis made above, it may be concluded that the proposed Bhavanapadu Greenfield Port Project shall
prove beneficial for economic and social development for the vicinity. During project construction and
operation phase, in addition to direct employment opportunity, the proposed project shall promote
indirect employment and development in the region. The standard of life and per capita income of the
people shall be improved. As per the Feasibility Assessment, the project is found to be viable from all
aspects such as technical, economic, environmental and social.
Draft SIA Report
February 2022
Development of Greenfield Port at Bhavanapadu, Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
P a g e | 50
Annexure-I
Photographs of the Site
Settlement Area in Rajapuram Village (Hamlet Mulapeta)
Settlement Area in Rajapuram Village (Hamlet Pathalingadu)
Open Area about 1.5 km south of Project Site
Submitted by
VOYANTS SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD. 403, 4th Floor, BPTP Park Centra, Sector - 30, NH-8, Gurugram - 122001 Phone - 0124-4598 200, Telefax - 0124-4019051 E-mail – [email protected], www.voyants.in
DEVELOPMENT OF GREENFIELD BHAVANAPADU PORT
DISTRICT SRIKAKULAM, ANDHRA PRADESH
WILDLIFE CONSERVATION PLAN REPORT
FEBRUARY 2022
Project Category: 7(e) A File NO.: 10-56/2020-IA.III Proposal No.: IA/ AP/ MIS/ 173542/ 2020
Monitoring Period Post Monsoon Period- 2020 Pre Monsoon Period- 2021
Monsoon Period- 2021
Andhra Pradesh Maritime Board (APMB)
Submitted by:
VOYANTS SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD. 403, 4thFloor, BPTP Park Centra,
Sector -30, NH-8, Gurugram-122001 Phone: 0124-4598 200, Telefax: 0124-4019051
E-mail: [email protected], www.voyants.in
Accredited EIA Consultant Organization by NABET, QCI, New Delhi
Certificate no. NABET/EIA/2124/RA 0223, 30/12/2021 Valid up to 14/09/2021
(S. No. 163 of list of Accredited Consultant Organization (Alphabetically) Rev. 74, March 07, 2019, MoEF&CC)
Wildlife Conservation Plan for Schedule I Faunal Species
of the Study area for the Development of Green Field Bhavanapadu Port in Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
1 | P a g e
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 INTRODUCTION AND PROJECT BACKGROUND ........................... 5
1.1 BACKGROUND ......................................................................................................................... 5
1.2 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF NATURE AND SIZE OF THE PROJECT ................................................. 5
1.3 THE PROPOSED PROJECT ........................................................................................................ 5
1.4 LOCATION OF THE PROJECT .................................................................................................... 5
1.5 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................................ 9
1.5.1 WATER REQUIREMENT AND SUPPLY SYSTEM .............................................................. 11
1.5.2 Solid Waste Management ............................................................................................. 11
1.5.3 Power Requirement and Supply Source ....................................................................... 11
1.6 PROJECT SALIENT FEATURES ................................................................................................. 11
1.7 LAND AREA ASSESSMENT FOR BHAVANAPADU PORT .......................................................... 12
1.7.1 land alllotment policy for ports in andhra pradesh ...................................................... 12
1.7.2 LAND REQUIREMENT FOR PORT OPERATIONS ............................................................. 12
1.7.3 LAND REQUIRED FOR EXTERNAL INFRASTRUCTURE ..................................................... 13
1.8 MANPOWER REQUIREMENT ................................................................................................. 15
1.9 WATER REQUIREMENT ......................................................................................................... 15
1.10 POWER REQUIREMENT ......................................................................................................... 16
1.10.1 Social Impacts ............................................................................................................... 16
1.11 PROJECT COST ....................................................................................................................... 17
2 OBJECTIVE AND METHODOLOGY ............................................. 18
2.1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 18
2.2 STUDY APPROACH ................................................................................................................. 18
3 STATUS OF FLORA AND FAUNA IN THE STUDY AREA ................ 19
3.1 FAUNAL STUDY ...................................................................................................................... 19
3.1.1 TERRESTRIAL ECOLOGY ................................................................................................. 19
3.2 FLORA .................................................................................................................................... 20
3.2.1 CHARACTERIZATION OF FOREST TYPES ........................................................................ 20
3.2.2 FOREST TYPES ................................................................................................................ 22
Wildlife Conservation Plan for Schedule I Faunal Species
of the Study area for the Development of Green Field Bhavanapadu Port in Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
2 | P a g e
3.2.3 FLORAL DIVERSITY ......................................................................................................... 23
3.2.4 FAUNAL DIVERSITY ........................................................................................................ 39
4 CONSERVATION STATUS ......................................................... 46
4.1 BACKGROUND ....................................................................................................................... 46
4.2 DECLINE OF WILDLIFE ........................................................................................................... 46
4.3 OBJECTIVES OF CONSERVATION PLAN .................................................................................. 46
4.4 MAMMALS, BIRDS &HERPETOFAUNA OF THE PROJECT AREA (10 km radius) (Belonging to
schedule I of Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 .................................................................................... 47
4.5 CONSERVATION STATUS OF REPTILES .................................................................................. 48
5 CONSERVATION ACTION PLAN ................................................ 57
5.1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 57
5.2 ACTION PLAN ........................................................................................................................ 57
5.2.1 SPECIAL STAFF FOR THE PROTECTION AND ANTI-POACHING ...................................... 57
5.2.2 ESTABLISHMENT OF EMERGENCY RESPONSE MECHANISM ......................................... 57
5.2.3 REDUCING MAN WILDLIFE CONFLICTS ......................................................................... 58
5.2.4 PROTECTION AND DEVELOPMENT OF HABITAT ........................................................... 58
5.2.5 CREATING SMALL WATER HOLE/ KHELIS ...................................................................... 58
5.2.6 CREATION OF DRINKING WATER FACILITY .................................................................... 58
5.2.7 CONSERVING AND RESTORING OF FOREST AREA WATER BODIES ............................... 58
5.2.8 PROVISION FOR ENVIRONMENT RESTORATION ........................................................... 58
5.2.9 HABITAT IMPROVEMENT ACTION PLAN ....................................................................... 58
5.2.10 SEED/ SAPLINGS DISTRIBUTION AMONG THE VILLAGERS ............................................ 59
5.2.11 TRAINING AND AWARENESS PROGRAMME ................................................................. 59
5.2.12 PROMOTION OF RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES ......................................................... 59
5.2.13 FOREST FIRE PROTECTION MEASURES ......................................................................... 59
5.2.14 PROCUREMENT OF EQUIPMENT’S ................................................................................ 59
5.3 MONITORING PLAN............................................................................................................... 59
5.3.1 Protocol based monitoring of Scheduled Species under Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972
using Daily/ Range level/ Long term Patrols. ................................................................................ 60
5.3.2 FOREST FIRE PROTECTION MEASURESMONITORING OF VEGETATION AND RET SPECIES
60
Wildlife Conservation Plan for Schedule I Faunal Species
of the Study area for the Development of Green Field Bhavanapadu Port in Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
3 | P a g e
5.4 BUDGETARY FOR CONSERVATION PLAN............................................................................... 63
6 CONCLUSION .......................................................................... 67
6.1 FURTHER SUGGESTIONS ....................................................................................................... 67
7 BIBLIOGRAPHY ........................................................................ 69
8 CITATION ................................................................................ 71
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1.1: Villages Proposed Port Limited of Bhavanapadu Port ........................................................... 5
Table 1.2: The features of the Proposed Bhavanapadu Port are as follows ......................................... 11
Table 1.3: Percentage of Land Required For Various Facilities in a Port .............................................. 12
Table 1.4: Traffic Projections under Different Scenarios for Bhavanapadu ......................................... 13
Table 1.5: Berth Requirement ............................................................................................................... 13
Table 1.6: Details of Land requirement for port infrastructure for Initial phase and Final Phase ....... 14
Table 1.7: Land Details .......................................................................................................................... 15
Table 1.8: Manpower Requirement details. ......................................................................................... 15
Table 1.9: Water Requirement details. ................................................................................................. 16
Table 1.10: Power Requirement details................................................................................................ 16
Table 1.11: Details of Land to be Acquired/Transferred for the Proposed Project .............................. 16
Table 2.1: Details of the Villages Surveyed ........................................................................................... 18
Table 3.1: Forest Cover in Project State and Project District ............................................................... 21
Table 3.2: List of Major Tree Species found in the Study Area ............................................................. 23
Table 3.3: List of Major Shrub Species found in the Study Area ........................................................... 28
Table 3.4: List of Major Herbaceous Flora found in the Study Area ..................................................... 30
Table 3.5: Important Mammalian Species Found in the Study Area .................................................... 39
Table 3.6: Amphibians recorded in and around the wetlands of Study Area ....................................... 39
Table 3.7: Reptiles recorded in and around the wetlands of Study Area ............................................. 40
Table 3.8: Avi-Faunal Species recorded in and around the wetlands of Study Area ............................ 41
Table 4.1: List of Schedule I species ...................................................................................................... 47
Table 5.1: Budgetary allocation for conservation Plan ......................................................................... 63
Wildlife Conservation Plan for Schedule I Faunal Species
of the Study area for the Development of Green Field Bhavanapadu Port in Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
4 | P a g e
Table 5.2: Year wise fund to be submitted by the user agency to State Forest Department, AP ........ 66
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1.1: Bhavanapadu Port Limits 6
Figure 1.2: Infographic representation of Site connectivity and macro level 7
Figure 1.3: Greenfield Bhavanapadu Port Layou 8
Figure 1.4: Andhra Pradesh District wise Divisions and Port Locations 9
Figure 1.5: Andhra Location Map of Bhavanapadu in Andhra Pradesh 10
Figure 3.1: Forest Cover Map of Andhra Pradesh depicting the Project Site 21
Figure 3.2: Family-wise distribution of the Tree Species found in the study area 27
Figure 3.3: Habit wise distribution of Tree Species found in the Study Area 28
Figure 3.4: Family-wise distribution of the Shrub Species found in the study area 30
Figure 3.5: Family-wise distribution of the Shrub Species found in the study area 38
Wildlife Conservation Plan for Schedule I Faunal Species
of the Study area for the Development of Green Field Bhavanapadu Port in Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
5 | P a g e
1 INTRODUCTION AND PROJECT BACKGROUND
1.1 BACKGROUND
Government of Andhra Pradesh is keen in developing Bhavanapadu Port in Srikakulam District, now to
cater to the increasing demand of various types of bulk and container cargo etc., which may likely to
raise to 300-350 Million tons per annum by 2024-25:
1.2 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF NATURE AND SIZE OF THE PROJECT
The Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEF&CC), Govt. of India through its
notification of 14th September 2006 and its subsequent amendment on dated 9th December, 2016
under the Environmental Protection Act, 1986, classifies the projects under Schedule 7 (e).
The proposed project under the mentioned category of Ports/ Harbours > 5 million TPA of Cargo
Handling Capacity fall under Category ‘A’ project. The Terms of Refernce have been issued by
MoEF&CC to Bhavanapadu Port bearing Proposal No.: IA/APMIS/173542/2020EAC File No.: 10-
56/2020-IA.III on 1 September 2021.
Government of Andhra Pradesh has proposed a Greenfield multipurpose port having a masterplan
development of 1010 acres area under Phase I.
1.3 THE PROPOSED PROJECT
The proposed project is a development of port infrastructure, APMB decided to undertake
development of Greenfield port at Bhavanapadu in Srikakulam District.
1.4 LOCATION OF THE PROJECT
Bhavanapadu village, proposed site for port development is a coastal village, located at North-East
corner of Andhra Pradesh, located in Srikakulam district. This port location is about 85 nautical miles
of north east of Visakhapatnam Port. The National Highway No. 16 (Chennai-Kolkata) is at a distance
of about 14.0 km to the proposed Bhavanapadu port. The nearest railway station to the proposed
port location is Naupada Junction (East Coast Railway) on Chennai- Howrah BG main line at about
7.0 kms from Bhavanapadu.
Bhavanapadu port located in North latitude of 18°35’; East longitude of 84°26'E is situated on southern
bank of Tekkali Creek. A fishery harbour exists at Bhavanapadu.
The co-ordinates of Bhavanapadu Port limits in the water front area are as given in Table below:
Table 1.1: Villages Proposed Port Limited of Bhavanapadu Port
Description Point Latitude (North)
Longitude (East)
NW Corner A 18°35'8.44''N 84°21'44.35''E
NE Corner B 18°32'21.7''N 84°26'29.45''E
SE Corner C 18°27'5.08''N 84°21'52.50''E
SW Corner D 18°30'48.83''N 84°18'5.30''E
Wildlife Conservation Plan for Schedule I Faunal Species
of the Study area for the Development of Green Field Bhavanapadu Port in Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
6 | P a g e
Figure 1.1: Bhavanapadu Port Limits
The Infographic representation of Site connectivity and macro level is shown in Figure 1.2 and the
Bhavanapadu Greenfield port layout is shown in the Figure 1.3.
Wildlife Conservation Plan for Schedule I Faunal Species
of the Study area for the Development of Green Field Bhavanapadu Port in Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
7 | P a g e
Figure 1.2: Infographic representation of Site connectivity and macro level
Wildlife Conservation Plan for Schedule I Faunal Species
of the Study area for the Development of Green Field Bhavanapadu Port in Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
8 | P a g e
Figure 1.3: Greenfield Bhavanapadu Port Layou
Wildlife Conservation Plan for Schedule I Faunal Species
of the Study area for the Development of Green Field Bhavanapadu Port in Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
9 | P a g e
1.5 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEF&CC), Govt. of India through its
notification of 14th September 2006 and its subsequent amendment on dated 9th December, 2016
under the Environmental Protection Act, 1986, classifies the projects under Schedule 7 (e).
The proposed project under the mentioned category of Ports/ Harbours > 5 million TPA of Cargo
Handling Capacity falls under Category ‘A’ project.
Government of Andhra Pradesh is keen in developing the following four non-major ports now to cater
to the increasing demand of various types of bulk and container cargo etc., which may likely to raise
to 300-350 Million tons per annum by 2024-25:
I. Bhavanapadu Port in Srikakulam District;
II. Kakinada SEZ Port in East Godavari;
III. Machilipatnam Port in Krishna District; and
IV. Ramayapatnam Port in Prakasham District
Figure 1.4: Andhra Pradesh District wise Divisions and Port Locations
Wildlife Conservation Plan for Schedule I Faunal Species
of the Study area for the Development of Green Field Bhavanapadu Port in Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
10 | P a g e
Figure 1.5: Andhra Location Map of Bhavanapadu in Andhra Pradesh
Wildlife Conservation Plan for Schedule I Faunal Species
of the Study area for the Development of Green Field Bhavanapadu Port in Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
11 | P a g e
1.5.1 WATER REQUIREMENT AND SUPPLY SYSTEM
Requirement of water for the Phase-I development of the Port is assessed for initial Phase is 1560 KLD
to be sourced form Water to be obtained from AP Rural Water Supply and Sanitation Department .
APMB desired to source it from the nearby reservoir. It is also explored to obtain water from the major
water reservoirs available in the proximity of Bhavanpadu port project site in Srikakulam district
namely B.R.R. Vamsadhara, Gotta barrage, Thottapalli barrage and Narayanapuram anicut. On the
above, Gotta barrage is about 50 km from Bhavanapadu.Pipe line from the reservoir shall be provided
for supply of water. Internal storage and distribution network are catered to in DPR.
1.5.2 SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT
The municipal solid waste generated which will be managed, treated or sent to authorize
recyclers. Collected waste oil will be sent to authorize TSDF Facility.
The solid waste generated from the harbor and port activities will be disposed off in
scientific manner to secured landfill as per Hazardous and Other Wastes (Management and
Transboundary Movement) Rules, 2016
1.5.3 POWER REQUIREMENT AND SUPPLY SOURCE
The estimated power requirement, taking all the requirements of power for conveyors, equipment
and illumination including future requirements, will be 5000 KVA. The power will be received from the
State Electricity Board in the Main Substation and distributed using two sub stations, one for the
supply to the Berths and one for the supply to the Yards.
1.6 PROJECT SALIENT FEATURES
Table 1.2: The features of the Proposed Bhavanapadu Port are as follows
S. No. Item Description
1. 1 Title of the project Development of Green field Bhavanapadu Port, Dist. Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
2. 2 Land area for development
1010 acres
(Port Development – 825.08 acres and Externa
Connectivity – 184.92 acres)
3. 3 District Srikakulam
4. 4 Taluka Santhabommali Mandal
5. 5 Village Panchayats, Zilla Parishad, Municipal Corporation, Local body (complete postal addresses with telephone nos. to be given)
The proposed Green field project land bank falls under villages of Mulapeta, Rajapuram, pathalingudu of Santhabommali Mandal, District Srikakulam, and State Andhra Pradesh.
6. 7 Implementing agency / SPV APMB
7. 8 Nature of the project (New / Existing / Upgradation)
New
8. 9 Project Cost Project Cost for Phase I - INR 309190 Lakhs.
Wildlife Conservation Plan for Schedule I Faunal Species
of the Study area for the Development of Green Field Bhavanapadu Port in Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
12 | P a g e
1.7 LAND AREA ASSESSMENT FOR BHAVANAPADU PORT
The requirement of land for the port infrastructure depends upon many factors, like type of cargo
(solid or liquid, bagged or bulk, project cargo, container cargo etc.), density of cargo, soil bearing
capacity of the backup area, connectivity to hinterland, railway yards, truck parking, environmental
considerations, quantum of cargo to be handled, captive port or commercial port, etc., it is difficult to
generalize the land requirement for a port. Furthermore, it also depends upon the annual throughput
of the commodity through the port and the design vessel size calling at the port, method of evacuation
etc. which plays a vital role in calculating the land requirement.
Therefore, procedures adopted by various Government bodies specially land allotment policy for ports
in Andhra Pradesh for BOT operators in this regard have been examined
1.7.1 LAND ALLLOTMENT POLICY FOR PORTS IN ANDHRA PRADESH
The Andhra Pradesh Maritime Board, Government of Andhra Pradesh is the nodal agency for
development of Seaports and Inland Water Transport in Andhra Pradesh. The approximate
percentages of land requirement for associated facilities in addition to the berth are indicated below:
Table 1.3: Percentage of Land Required For Various Facilities in a Port
Facilities Land
Requirement
Storage Capacity including Warehouses etc 25%
Road/Rail/Conveyor/Pipeline Corridor and Truck parking 20%
Green belt 34%
Offices and institutional area 0.5%
Utilities (Water supply, power supply, maintenance buildings and workshops, security complexes)
0.5%
Amenities (Canteen, dispensaries, rest shelters, recreation areas etc.) 0.5%
Circulation space / Future expansion 18%
Land required for construction of berth and transit area etc. 1.5%
Total 100%
1.7.2 LAND REQUIREMENT FOR PORT OPERATIONS
The UNCTAD guidelines for assessment of land requirement for port operations have also been
examined for estimation of land requirement.
The major factors influence land requirement for port operations are:
Modern operational practices
Direct shipment without passing formally through a transit shed or storage area through
direct handling availing ‘port time’
Transit storage (Short term, Long term storages)
Ship size
Cargo characteristics
Wildlife Conservation Plan for Schedule I Faunal Species
of the Study area for the Development of Green Field Bhavanapadu Port in Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
13 | P a g e
Cargo handling rates
Stacking factors
Rate of evacuation from port
Multiple users
Dwell time
The most important factor influences on the amount of area required for port operations is ship size
and the storage characteristics of the cargo. It is important to qualify these factors by allowing for
future demands which may increase the requirement. The layout of operational areas is based on
the berth which must relate the size of ship. Hence land use planning must take account of the sizes
of ships to be handled.
The traffic studies carried out and elaborated at Chapter-4 for the proposed Bhavanapadu port has
estimated traffic projections for ultimate horizon period of 2039-40
Table 1.4: Traffic Projections under Different Scenarios for Bhavanapadu
Port Scenario Traffic in Million Tons
Likely Scenario 83.30
Table 1.5: Berth Requirement
Cargo composition 2024-25 (Year of commencement of port operations)
Cargo (million tons) No. of berths
General Cargo - Agricultural products, Fertilizers, Mineral sands, granite blocks, cement, iron and steel products, containers, edible oil and other commodities
11.53
3 for General cargo and
one for coal handling
Coal – Thermal coal for captive power plants and Domestic coal (Coastal shipping) and coking coal
11.96
Total 23.50 4
For purpose of determining the land requirement, it is necessary to look at the potential of the port
in terms of the optimistic projections so that the provision for future does not fall short. The area
requirements are examined for the years 2024-25 (Initial Stage, estimated year of commencement of
port operations) and 2039-40 (Ultimate Stage). Traffic volumes to be dealt with these stages are given
as under:
1.7.3 LAND REQUIRED FOR EXTERNAL INFRASTRUCTURE
Details of Land requirement for port infrastructure for Initial phase and Final Phase is given in the
below Table 1.6 and Land Type details is given in the Table 1.7.
Wildlife Conservation Plan for Schedule I Faunal Species
of the Study area for the Development of Green Field Bhavanapadu Port in Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
14 | P a g e
Table 1.6: Details of Land requirement for port infrastructure for Initial phase and Final Phase
Sl. No. Port Infrastructure End of Initial Phase
In Acres In Ha
LAND AREA
A Storage Area
i) Coal Storage Area 136.68 55.31
ii) Iron Ore Storage Area 1.53 0.62
iii) Container 0.00 0.00
iv) Food grains 17.79 7.20
v) Other general cargo (Open) 16.00 6.47
Other general cargo (Covered) 22.46 9.09
vi) Tank farms 0.00 0.00
Vii) Fertilizer and chemicals 5.61 2.27
ix) Granite 1.95 0.79
Total Storage Area: 202.015 81.75
Sl. No.
Port Infrastructure
End of Initial Phase
In Acres In Ha
B Other General Requirement
i) Offices and industrial area (Port administrative building, workshop etc) 50.50 20.43
ii) Amenities (Canteen, Dispensary, rest shelters, recreation, banks, etc.) 40.40 16.34
iii) Roads/Truck parking/ Railways Line /weigh bridges/ Yard etc. 60.60 24.52
iv) Car parking at various buildings 10.10 4.08
v)
Roads and Utilities (Water Supply,
Drainage, Sewer, Power Supply, Power SubStation, Maintenance Buildings, Security Complexes, Fire Station, Gate House,
Conveyor, Pipelines etc.,)
60.60 24.52
vi) Berth backup area 20.00 8.09
vii) Land required for construction of transit sheds
40.40 16.34
viii) Parks/Open Space 80.63 32.63
ix)
For future expansion and general uncertainty allocation including residential quarters etc 60.60 24.52
Total of other general area (B) 423.85 171.47
Total Land Area: A+B 625.87 253.22
Add about 33% for green belt area 200.00 80.94
Wildlife Conservation Plan for Schedule I Faunal Species
of the Study area for the Development of Green Field Bhavanapadu Port in Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
15 | P a g e
Sl. No. Port Infrastructure End of Initial Phase
In Acres In Ha
Total area for port development in Acres 825.87
Say Acres 826
Area for external infrastructure (Road and rail connectivity to port; Rail@ 15m RoW and Road @ 45m RoW total 183.78 acres)
Total 1010 Acres
Table 1.7: Land Details
Bhavanapadu Port –Land Type Land Area in Ac.
CB Land 122.06
Forest Land 2.99
Revenue Land 66.54
Patta Land 320.05
Salt Pan 234.44
Unassessed Waste Land 79.00
Total Land for Phase I 825.08
Rail @ 15m ROW 27.83
Road @ 45m ROW 157.09
External Connectivity 184.92
Total Land 1010.00 Acres
1.8 MANPOWER REQUIREMENT
Table 1.8: Manpower Requirement details.
Sr.No. Manpower Details Numbers (Skilled & Unskilled)
1 No. of people to be employed 10,000 Nos.(Phase I)
2 For Operational Port Staff 2,500 Nos.
3 For Construction 7,500 Nos.
1.9 WATER REQUIREMENT
1,560 KLD - Domestic Source: AP Rural Water Supply and Sanitation Department. Industrial Source:
from the near-by reservoirs and Govt. of Andhra Pradesh
Wildlife Conservation Plan for Schedule I Faunal Species
of the Study area for the Development of Green Field Bhavanapadu Port in Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
16 | P a g e
Table 1.9: Water Requirement details.
Sr.No. Water Requirements
1 Total Water Requirement 1560 KLD
2 Source For Domestic Purpose Water to be Obtained from AP Rural Water Supply and Sanitation Department
3 Source For Industrial Purpose Water demand shall be met from the near-by reservoirs and Govt. of Addhra Pradesh
1.10 POWER REQUIREMENT
Table 1.10: Power Requirement details.
Sr.No. Power Requirement
1 Maximum Demand 24 MW
2 Source Local power supply grid of APTRANSCO
3 DG Set 100% power backup shall be considered for all LT services of port during main power failure.
1.10.1 SOCIAL IMPACTS
The Primary Project Impact Area (PIA) is identified as direct project impact area that is the villages
under which proposed project falls. The project may also have major influence in Srikakulam District
(secondary PIA) and Andhra Pradesh state (tertiary PIA).
Out of total land, approximately 320.05 acres of land shall be acquired from patta land (private land),
234.44 acres from salt pan land, 122.06 acres from CB land and 66.54 acres from revenue land.
Approximately 188 acres of land shall also be required for internal and external road connectivity. The
land shall be acquired APMB as per RFCTLARR (Andhra Pradesh Amendment) 2018 Act. The details of
land proposed to be acquired has been summarized in Table 4.1.
Table 1.11: Details of Land to be Acquired/Transferred for the Proposed Project
S. No. Type of Land Area (in Acre)
1 CB Land 122.06
2.1 Internal Road 1.12
2.2 Internal Road 1.87
2.3 Total Internal Road 2.99
3 Revenue Land 66.54
4 Patta Land 320.05
5 Salt pan 234.44
Wildlife Conservation Plan for Schedule I Faunal Species
of the Study area for the Development of Green Field Bhavanapadu Port in Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
17 | P a g e
6 Unassessed Waste Land 79.00
Total Land for Phase I 825
7.1 Rail @ 15 m ROW 27.83
7.2 Road @ 45 m ROW 157.09
7.3 External Connectivity 185
Total Land 1010.00
1.11 PROJECT COST
Total project Cost of Phase-1 considering the land acquisition cost, escalation factor and other project
related works is Rs. 309190 Lakhs
Wildlife Conservation Plan for Schedule I Faunal Species
of the Study area for the Development of Green Field Bhavanapadu Port in Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
18 | P a g e
2 OBJECTIVE AND METHODOLOGY
2.1 INTRODUCTION
The ecology is the scientific analysis and study of interactions among organisms and their
environment. It is an interdisciplinary field that includes biology and Earth science. The biodiversity
assessment and conservation discipline explore natural landscapes, species and ecosystems and
acquires theories and practical methods in preserving environments and organisms. Biodiversity
refers not only to endangered species but also to every organism, including microbes and fungi.
Biodiversity assessment and conservation program increase awareness and understanding of how
human life depends on preserving animal species and natural ecosystems.
2.2 STUDY APPROACH
The study area of the proposed Bhavanapadu Port reported with Schedule-I and Schedule II species
in accordance to Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972, which provide absolute protection to these
Schedule-I species under the act and any offences under the act is prescribed the highest penalties
& imprisonment.
A systematic study was conducted to assess the status in terms of movements and habitat use of the
Schedule-I and Schedule II species reported/observed in the proposed Bhavanapadu Port and its
environs of 10 km radius. At first, a detailed biological survey of Bhavanapadu Port was carried out to
understand the status distribution of the species in the study area. Further, survey was carried out to
understand the recent status of these species’ sightings and their movements. Local inhabitants of
villages were interviewed to understand the possible habitat, food and feeding habitat of these
species in the study area. All the surveyed villages are located near Bhavanapadu Port. The details of
the villages surveyed are given in Table 2.1
Table 2.1: Details of the Villages Surveyed
S.No Village
1 Pathlingadu
2 Mulapetha
Wildlife Conservation Plan for Schedule I Faunal Species
of the Study area for the Development of Green Field Bhavanapadu Port in Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
19 | P a g e
3 STATUS OF FLORA AND FAUNA IN THE STUDY AREA
3.1 FAUNAL STUDY
3.1.1 TERRESTRIAL ECOLOGY
The Baseline study for the terrestrial ecological environment was carried out in a phased and
constructive manner. Successive phases of the assessment include (i) secondary data collection
through the review of available literatures and (ii) on site data collection for determining flora and
fauna in the study area and (iii) reconnaissance survey. The survey for ecology and biodiversity
assessment was conducted in the proposed Port location and its vicinity. Team of ecology experts
visited the site during October to December 2020 (Post-Monsoon Season).
Secondary available information was also reviewed while finalizing the list of floral and faunal species.
The survey included:
Reconnaissance Survey
Generation of primary data to understand baseline ecological status of floral and faunal diversity,
sensitive habitats and rare species
Importance and status of flora and fauna
For secondary data collection an extensive review of available published literatures (Books, Websites,
Scientific Papers, articles etc.) was conducted. The forest working plan of The Srikakulam Forest
Division (T) and data received from the concerned division on Tekkali Sub-Division was also referred
for secondary information in addition to the meeting with concerned Divisional Forest Officer,
Srikakulam (T); information was also sourced from the APMB, Government institutions, and local
residents of the survey area. The secondary data was also appropriately supplemented by a field
survey for primary data collection.
3.1.1.1 Data Collection
The Baseline study for the existing ecological environment was carried out in a phased and
constructive manner. Collection and generation of ecological data has been completed at two levels:
Field Studies and Secondary data sources. Field Survey was conducted by a team comprised of
terrestrial and aquatic ecologists during October to December 2020 (Post-Monsoon Season). The
specific parameters covered as part of primary level surveys/field studies have been described in the
following paragraphs
3.1.1.2 Sampling Methodology for Floral Study
Static sampling was carried out in the and around the project to get a consolidated list of plant species
available in the study area.
Wildlife Conservation Plan for Schedule I Faunal Species
of the Study area for the Development of Green Field Bhavanapadu Port in Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
20 | P a g e
3.1.1.3 Collection of Secondary Data
Secondary data collection an extensive review of available published literatures (Books, Websites,
Scientific Papers, articles etc.) was conducted. The forest working plan of The Srikakulam Forest
Division (T) and data received from the concerned division on Tekkali Sub-Division was also referred
for secondary information in addition to the meeting with concerned Divisional Forest Officer,
Srikakulam (T), information was also sourced from the APMB, Government institutions, and local
residents of the survey area.
The secondary data was also appropriately supplemented by a field survey for primary data collection.
3.1.1.4 Review/ Reference of Relevant Literature/ Books
To complete this study the information from published books, materials and scientific literature is
relied upon.
3.1.1.5 Data Synthesis and Results
The primary data collected from the field are subjected to standard statistical tests and species are
identified with reference to published books and materials. The study revealed following status of the
species i.e., flora and fauna in the given area.
3.2 FLORA
3.2.1 CHARACTERIZATION OF FOREST TYPES
The study area falls under Srikakulam district of Andhra Pradesh and having a geographical area of
5837 km2, out of which, the total forest area (excluding scrub) is about 860.83 km2. The Forest Cover
is about 14.75 km2 of district and about 0.52% of the total geographical area of Andhra Pradesh i.e.
162968 km2 .The district is predominantly covered by open Forest (706.71 Km2) followed by
moderately dense forest (154.12Km2). The very dense forest are categorically not reported in the
project district. The Scrubs accounts only 389.64 Km2 in the project district.
Wildlife Conservation Plan for Schedule I Faunal Species
of the Study area for the Development of Green Field Bhavanapadu Port in Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
21 | P a g e
Figure 3.1 Depicts the Forest Cover Map of Andhra Pradesh highlighting the Project Site.
*Source: India States of the Forest Report-Andhra Pradesh, 2021 Published by Forest Survey of India, Dehradun
Figure 3.1: Forest Cover Map of Andhra Pradesh depicting the Project Site
Table 3.1: Forest Cover in Project State and Project District
State/ District Geographical Area (Sq Km.)
2021 Assessment % of GA
Change in forest cover w.r.t ISFR 2019
Scrub
Very Dense Forest
Mod. Dense Forest
Open Forest
Total Forest Cover
Srikakulam 5837 0.00 154.12 706.71 860.83 14.75 41.52 389.64
Andhra Pradesh
162968 1994.28
13928.75
13861.27
29784.30
18.28 646.90 8276.90
(*Source: India States of the Forest Report-Andhra Pradesh, 2021 Published by Forest Survey of India, Dehradun)
Wildlife Conservation Plan for Schedule I Faunal Species
of the Study area for the Development of Green Field Bhavanapadu Port in Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
22 | P a g e
3.2.2 FOREST TYPES
The forests in the project district Srikakulam are largely mixed dry deciduous forests which are
secondary in origin. Constant adverse biotic factors particularly, recurring annual forest fires, grazing
and ‘podu’ cultivation are some of the factors which led to the present degraded condition of the
forests. Based on the Champion & Seth’s revised classification of forests of India (1968) the following
types of forests existed in the district:
Southern tropical moist mixed deciduous forests: These are high forests, generally 20 m and above,
with relatively negligible number of evergreen elements in the upper canopy. Evergreen habit is more
pronounced in the lower storey. Bamboo under growth is generally absent, but when present
constitutes the second storey.
Epiphytes and climbers are plenty. Altitude is 610 m and above and average rainfall is 1020 mm and
above. The trees in the top storey are leafless for a short period either in winter or early summer.
Most of these trees flower during summer. This type occurs in localized small patches in valleys and
near perennial streams at a fairly high altitude where the conditions are favourable. They are found
in parts of Burnakonda and Antikonda block of Palakonda range. This type of forest extends over 2600
ha.
Northern Tropical Dry Deciduous Forests-Sal Type: The distribution of Sal (Shorea robusta) is
restricted owing to the relatively narrow limits of locally conducive factors suitable for it. The soils in
this type of forests, which is absent or thin on the ridges, vary from deep ferruginous sandy loams to
clay and lime, leading to stunted growth of Sal. The tree height here is 20 to 25 m, density 0.6 to 0.8,
canopy fairly closed, and with under growth. Altitude is between 350 to 600 m, and rainfall above
1,000 mm. Sal is found in the northern most part of the district bordering Odisha state, in areas lying
between the rivers Vamsadhara and Nagavalli and their tributaries as they enter Andhra Pradesh.
Confined to the Palakonda Range, Sal forests are spread over about 20 ha.
Southern Tropical Dry Mixed Deciduous Forests: The upper canopy in this forest types is rather open,
uneven and not very dense, formed by a mixture of deciduous trees. Most of these trees also occur in
moist deciduous forests, attaining a satisfactory growth there. The height of dry deciduous forests in
this division is generally 10 to 15 m. The species is much less in number than other types of forests
and a few tend to predominate in any selected area for the soil peculiarities or human interference.
The lower canopies also consist of deciduous species here and there. Semi-ever green scrubs when
present are confined to moist sheltered pockets. Bamboos are present. Due to open canopy enough
light gets down permitting grass growth. Annual fire and other biotic factors eventually result in the
development of dry scrub and eventually leading to savannah type. Rainfall is between 600 m and
1000 mm. Soils are impoverished, organic matter and topsoil being practically absent and the area, of
these forests spread over 26,000 ha.
Dry Deciduous scrub: This is a degradation stage of dry deciduous mixed forest conditioned by heavy
grazing, fires and removals. The adverse biotic factors overrule the favourable climate and keep these
forests in a degraded stage preventing improvement /progression of the vegetation. Canopy height
never exceeds 6 m and is open with the presence of Bamboo. Many of the shrubs here are unpalatable
Wildlife Conservation Plan for Schedule I Faunal Species
of the Study area for the Development of Green Field Bhavanapadu Port in Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
23 | P a g e
(Holarrhena antidysenterica, Dodonaea viscose etc) to cattle or thorny (Randia, Carissa). These forests
are characterized by the presence of relatively high percentage of thorny species, and thin grass
occurring throughout. The soils here are impoverished, eroded, gullied, bouldery and rocky, and
rainfall below 1,000 mm.
Dry Evergreen Forests: These forests are mostly open, irregular with an average height of 6 m and
less. Preponderance of thorny species is conspicuous. This type of forest occurs in the eroded slopes,
surface being gravelly with almost no soil subject to heavy biotic interference. This forest occurs in
Bejji and Asokam blocks of Pathapatnam range spreading over 16,800 ha.
Beach Forests: This type of forests is distributed all along the coast wherever a fair width of sandy
beach occurs. The soil is sea-sand often blown and accumulating low-dunes with adequate lime from
shell-fragments but poor in other mineral nutrients. These forests extend over 5820 ha. Species seen
here are very few; Casuarina equisetifolia, Ipomea biloba, Spinifex squarrosus, Pandanus
odoratissimuma and climbers like Chinopodum near the estuaries.
3.2.3 FLORAL DIVERSITY
The Floral diversity in terms of Over-storey vegetation (Trees) and under-storey vegetation (shrubs,
herbs, grasses & climbers) found in the study area and its environs is described in the appended
section below:
3.2.3.1 Trees
According to primary and secondary survey, a total of 140 tree species belonging to 49 families were
found in the study area. Mimosaceae and Moraceae were found to be the most dominant families
having 10 species each followed by Caesalpiniaceae with 09 families (Please Refer Figure 3.2). Out of
140 tree species found in the study area, 133 terrestrial species of trees followed by 04 Marshy Tree
Species, 02 Aquatic and 01 semi-aquatic species were found (Please Refer Figure 3.3).
Table 3.2 exhibits the important tree species observed in the study area during the primary survey
and supported by the secondary literature.
Table 3.2: List of Major Tree Species found in the Study Area
S.No Species Family Habit Habitat
1. Acacia catechu (L.f.) Willd. Mimosaceae Terrestrial Wild
2. Acacia leucophloea (Roxb.) Willd. Mimosaceae Terrestrial Wild
3. Acacia nilotica (L.) Willd. ex Del. Mimosaceae Terrestrial Wild
4. Aegle marmelos (L.) Correa Rutaceae Terrestrial Wild
5. Aglaia elaeagnoidea (Juss.) Benth. Meliaceae Terrestrial Wild
6. Ailanthus excelsa Roxb. Simaroubaceae Terrestrial Wild
7. Alangium salviifolium (L.f.) Wang. Alangiaceae Terrestrial Wild
8. Albizia amara (Roxb.) Boivin Mimosaceae Terrestrial Wild
9. Albizia lebbeck (L.) Willd. Mimosaceae Terrestrial Wild
10. Alstonia scholaris (L.) R.Br. Apocynaceae Terrestrial Cultivated
11. Annona reticulata L. Annonaceae Terrestrial Planted
12. Annona squamosa L. Annonaceae Terrestrial Cultivated
13. Anthocephalus cadamba (Roxb.) Miq. Rubiaceae Terrestrial Cultivated
Wildlife Conservation Plan for Schedule I Faunal Species
of the Study area for the Development of Green Field Bhavanapadu Port in Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
24 | P a g e
S.No Species Family Habit Habitat
14. Araucaria cunninghamii Aiton ex D.Don Araucariaceae Terrestrial Ornamental
15. Ardisia solanaceaRoxb. Myrisinaceae Marshy Wild
16. Avicennia officinalis L. Avicenniaceae Marshy Wild
17. Azadirachta indica A. Juss. Meliaceae Terrestrial Wild
18. Balanites aegyptiaca (L.) Del. Balanitaceae Terrestrial Wild
19. Barringtonia racemosa (L.) Spreng. Lecythidaceae Terrestrial Wild
20. Bassia latifolia Roxb. Sapotaceae Terrestrial Wild
21. Bauhinia purpurea L. Caesalpiniaceae Terrestrial Cultivated
22. Bauhinia racemosa Lam. Caesalpiniaceae Terrestrial Wild
23. Bombax ceiba L. Bombacaceae Terrestrial Wild
24. Bridelia crenulata Roxb. Euphorbiaceae Terrestrial Wild
25. Buchanania axillaris (Desr.) Ramam. Anacardiaceae Terrestrial Wild
26. Butea monosperma (Lam.) Taub. Fabaceae Terrestrial Wild
27. Capparis decidua (Forssk.) Edgew. Capparidaceae Terrestrial Wild
28. Capparis grandis L. Capparidaceae Terrestrial Wild
29. Caryota urens L. Arecaceae Terrestrial Wild
30. Cassia fistula L. Caesalpiniaceae Terrestrial Wild
31. Cassia obtusa L. Caesalpiniaceae Terrestrial Wild
32. Cassia siamea Lam. Caesalpiniaceae Terrestrial Wild
33. Casuarina equisetifolia L. Casuarinaceae Terrestrial Planted
34. Ceiba pentandra (L.) Gaertn. Bombacaceae Terrestrial Wild
35. Cereus pterogonus Lem. Cactaceae Terrestrial Wild
36. Chloroxylon swietenia DC. Rutaceae Terrestrial Wild
37. Commiphora berryi (Arn.) Engler Burseraceae Terrestrial Wild
38. Commiphora caudata (Wight & Arn.) Engler Burseraceae Terrestrial Wild
39. Cordia dichotoma G. Forst. Boraginaceae Terrestrial Wild
40. Cordia domestica Roth Boraginaceae Terrestrial Wild
41. Cordia myxa L. Boraginaceae Terrestrial Wild
42. Cordia sebestena L. Boraginaceae Terrestrial Ornamental
43. Couroupita guianensis Aubl. Lecythidaceae Terrestrial Ornamental
44. Cycas circinalis L. Cycadaceae Terrestrial Ornamental
45. Dalbergia sissoo Roxb. Fabaceae Terrestrial Planted
46. Delonix elata (L.) Gamble Caesalpiniaceae Terrestrial Wild
47. Delonix regia (Boj. ex Hook) Rafin. Caesalpiniaceae Terrestrial Wild
48. Dillenia indica L. Dilleniaceae Terrestrial Planted
49. Diospyros buxifolia (Blume) Hiern Ebenaceae Terrestrial Wild
50. Diospyros chloroxylon Roxb. Ebenaceae Terrestrial Wild
51. Diospyros malabarica (Desr.) Kostel. Ebenaceae Terrestrial Wild
52. Diospyros melanoxylon Roxb. Ebenaceae Terrestrial Wild
53. Erythrina stricta Roxb. Fabaceae Terrestrial Planted
54. Erythroxylum monogynum Roxb. Erythroxylaceae Terrestrial Wild
55. Euphorbia tirucalli L. Euphorbiaceae Terrestrial Wild
56. Euphorbia trigona Mill. Euphorbiaceae Terrestrial Wild
57. Exocoecaria agallocha Linn. Euphorbiaceae Aquatic Wild
58. Ficus amplissima J.E. Smith Moraceae Terrestrial Wild
59. Ficus benghalensis L. Moraceae Terrestrial Wild
60. Ficus hispida L.f. Moraceae Terrestrial Wild
61. Ficus microcarpa var. microcarpa L.f. Moraceae Terrestrial Wild
62. Ficus microcarpa var. retusa L.f. Moraceae Terrestrial Wild
63. Ficus racemosa L. Moraceae Terrestrial Wild
64. Ficus religiosa L. Moraceae Terrestrial Wild
65. Ficus tinctoria Forst.f. Moraceae Terrestrial Wild
Wildlife Conservation Plan for Schedule I Faunal Species
of the Study area for the Development of Green Field Bhavanapadu Port in Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
25 | P a g e
S.No Species Family Habit Habitat
66. Ficus virens Ait. Moraceae Terrestrial Wild
67. Filicium decipiens (Wight & Arn.) Thw. Sapindaceae Terrestrial Wild
68. Flacourtia indica (Burm.f.) Merr. Flacourtiaceae Terrestrial Wild
69. Flacourtia ramontchi L'Herit. Flacourtiaceae Terrestrial Wild
70. Gardenia latifolia Ait. Rubiaceae Terrestrial Wild
71. Gliricidia sepium (Jacq.) Kunth ex Walp. Fabaceae Terrestrial Exotic
72. Gmelina arborea Roxb. Verbenaceae Terrestrial Wild
73. Grewia tiliifolia Vahl. Tiliaceae Terrestrial Wild
74. Guazuma ulmifolia Lam. Sterculiaceae Terrestrial Planted
75. Hibiscus rosa-sinensis Linn. Malvaceae Terrestrial Planted
76. Hibiscus tiliaceus L. Malvaceae Terrestrial Wild
77. Holoptelea integrifolia (Roxb.) Planch. Ulmaceae Terrestrial Wild
78. Ixora arborea Roxb. ex Sm. Rubiaceae Terrestrial Wild
79. Jacaranda mimosifolia D.Don. Bignoniaceae Terrestrial Ornamental
80. Kigelia pinnata (Jacq.) DC. Bignoniaceae Terrestrial Planted
81. Kleinhovia hospita L. Sterculiaceae Terrestrial Planted
82. Lagerstroemia reginae Roxb. Lythraceae Terrestrial Ornamental
83. Lepisanthes tetraphylla (Vahl.) Radlk. Sapindaceae Terrestrial Wild
84. Leucaena leucocephala (L.) Gills Mimosaceae Terrestrial Exotic
85. Limonia acidissima L. Rutaceae Terrestrial Planted
86. Madhuca longifolia (J.Konig) J.F.Macbr. Sapotaceae Terrestrial Wild
87. Mangifera indica L. Anacardiaceae Terrestrial Planted
88. Manilkara hexandra (Roxb.) Dubard Sapotaceae Terrestrial Wild
89. Markhamia stipulata Seem. Bignoniaceae Terrestrial Ornamental
90. Melia azedarach L. Meliaceae Terrestrial Ornamental
91. Memecylon edule Roxb. Melastomataceae Terrestrial Wild
92. Memecylon umbellatum Burm.f. Melastomataceae Terrestrial Wild
93. Millingtonia hortensis L.f. Bignoniaceae Terrestrial Ornamental
94. Mimusops elengi L. Sapotaceae Terrestrial Ornamental
95. Mitragyna parvifolia (Roxb.) Korth. Rubiaceae Terrestrial Wild
96. Morinda pubescens J.E. Smith. Rubiaceae Terrestrial Wild
97. Moringa oleifera Lam. Moringaceae Terrestrial Cultivated
98. Murraya koenigii (L.) Spreng. Rutaceae Terrestrial Planted
99. Musa parasidiaca L. Musaceae Terrestrial Planted
100. Naringi crenulata (Roxb.) Nicolson Rutaceae Terrestrial Wild
101. Nyctanthes arbor-tristis L. Oleaceae Terrestrial Ornamental
102. Pandanus odoratissimus L.f. Pandanaceae Aquatic Wild
103. Parkia biglandulosa Wight Arn. Mimosaceae Terrestrial Ornamental
104. Parkinsonia aculeata L. Fabaceae Semi-aquatic Wild
105. Peltophorum pterocarpum (DC.) Caesalpiniaceae Terrestrial Planted
106. Phoenix sylvestris (L.) Roxb. Arecaceae Terrestrial Planted
107. Phyllanthus emblica L. Euphorbiaceae Terrestrial Planted
108. Pisonia aculeata L. Nyctaginaceae Terrestrial Ornamental
109. Pithecellobium dulce (Roxb.) Benth. Mimosaceae Terrestrial Planted
110. Plumeria acuminata Ait. Apocynaceae Terrestrial Ornamental
111. Plumeria alba L. Apocynaceae Terrestrial Ornamental
112. Plumeria rubra L. Apocynaceae Terrestrial Ornamental
113. Polyalthia cerasoides (Roxb.) Bedd. Annonaceae Terrestrial Wild
114. Polyalthia longifolia (Sonner.) Thw. Annonaceae Terrestrial Ornamental
115. Polyalthia suberosa (Roxb.) Thw. Annonaceae Terrestrial Wild
116. Pongamia pinnata (L.) Pierre Fabaceae Terrestrial Wild
117. Premna tomentosa L. Verbenaceae Terrestrial Wild
Wildlife Conservation Plan for Schedule I Faunal Species
of the Study area for the Development of Green Field Bhavanapadu Port in Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
26 | P a g e
S.No Species Family Habit Habitat
118. Prosopis cineraria (L.) Druce Mimosaceae Terrestrial Wild
119. Prosopis juliflora (Sw.) Dc. Mimosaceae Terrestrial Exotic
120. Pterocarpus marsupium Roxb. Fabaceae Terrestrial Wild
121. Pterocarpus santalinus L. Fabaceae Terrestrial Wild
122. Pterospermum acerifolium (L.) Willd. Sterculiaceae Terrestrial Wild
123. Pterospermum xylocarpum (Gaertn) S & W. Sterculiaceae Terrestrial Wild
124. Punica granatum L. Punicaceae Terrestrial Planted
125. Rhizophora apiculata Blume Rhizophoraceae Marshy Wild
126. Ricinus communis L. Euphorbiaceae Terrestrial Cultivated
127. Sapindus emarginatus Vahl. Sapindaceae Terrestrial Wild
128. Sonneratia apetala Buch. - Ham. Sonneratiaceae Marshy Wild
129. Spondias pinnata Kurz. Anacardiaceae Terrestrial Planted
130. Sterculia foetida Linn. Sterculiaceae Terrestrial Ornamental
131. Streblus asper Lour. Moraceae Terrestrial Wild
132. Suregada lanceolata (Willd.) Kuntze Euphorbiaceae Terrestrial Wild
133. Swietenia macrophylla King Meliaceae Terrestrial Planted
134. Swietenia mahagoni (L.) Jacq. Meliaceae Terrestrial Planted
135. Syzygium cumini (L.) Skeels Myrtaceae Terrestrial Planted
136. Tabebuia arjentea Britton Bignoniaceae Terrestrial Planted
137. Tabebuia rosea (Bertol.) DC. Bignoniaceae Terrestrial Planted
138. Tamarindus indica L. Caesalpiniaceae Terrestrial Planted
139. Tectona grandis L.f. Verbenaceae Terrestrial Wild
140. Terminalia arjuna (Roxb.) Wight & Arn. Myrtaceae Terrestrial Planted *Source: Primary data collected by VSPL and supported through Secondary Literature
Wildlife Conservation Plan for Schedule I Faunal Species
of the Study area for the Development of Green Field Bhavanapadu Port in Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
27 | P a g e
Figure 3.2: Family-wise distribution of the Tree Species found in the study area
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10A
lan
giac
eae
An
acar
dia
ceae
An
no
nac
eae
Ap
ocy
nac
eae
Ara
uca
riac
eae
Are
cace
ae
Avi
cen
nia
ceae
Avi
cen
nia
ceae
Big
no
nia
ceae
Bo
mb
acac
eae
Bo
ragi
nac
eae
Bu
rser
acea
e
Cac
tace
ae
Cae
salp
inia
ceae
Cap
par
idac
eae
Cas
uar
inac
eae
Cyc
adac
eae
Dill
enia
ceae
Eben
ace
ae
Eryt
hro
xyla
ceae
Eup
ho
rbia
ceae
Fab
ace
ae
Flac
ou
rtia
ceae
Lecy
thid
ace
ae
Lyth
race
ae
Mal
vace
ae
Mel
asto
mat
ace
ae
Mel
iace
ae
Mim
osa
ceae
Mo
race
ae
Mo
rin
gace
ae
Mu
sace
ae
Myr
isin
acea
e
Myr
tace
ae
Nyc
tagi
nac
eae
Ole
acea
e
Pan
dan
ace
ae
Pu
nic
acea
e
Rh
izo
ph
ora
ceae
Ru
bia
ceae
Ru
tace
ae
Sap
ind
ace
ae
Sap
ota
ceae
Sim
aro
ub
acea
e
Son
ner
atia
ceae
Ster
culia
ceae
Tilia
ceae
Ulm
acea
e
Ver
be
nac
eae
1
3
5
4
1
2
1 1
6
2
4
2
1
9
2
1 1 1
4
1
7
8
2 2
1
2 2
5
10 10
1 1 1
2
1 1 1 1 1
5 5
3
4
1 1
5
1 1
3
Wildlife Conservation Plan for Schedule I Faunal Species
of the Study area for the Development of Green Field Bhavanapadu Port in Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
28 | P a g e
Figure 3.3: Habit wise distribution of Tree Species found in the Study Area
3.2.3.2 Shrubs
The primary and secondary survey reveals the presence of 69 shrub species in the study area and its
environs. Euphorbiaceae is the predominant family representing 11 shrub species in the study area
followed by Malvaceae and Rubiaceae which covers 06 shrub species each (Please Refer Figure 3.4).
Table 3.3 exhibits the important shrub species observed in the study area during the primary survey
and supported by the secondary literature.
Table 3.3: List of Major Shrub Species found in the Study Area
Sl. No. Species Family Habitat Type
1 Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench Malvaceae Terrestrial Cultivated
2 Abutilon hirtum (Lam.) Sweet Malvaceae Terrestrial Wild
3 Abutilon indicum (L.) Sweet Malvaceae Terrestrial Wild
4 Acalypha fruticosa Forssk. Euphorbiaceae Terrestrial Wild
5 Anisochilus carnosus (L.f.) wall. Lamiaceae Terrestrial Wild
6 Anisochilus scaber Benth. Lamiaceae Terrestrial Wild
7 Arundo donax L. Poaceae Marshy Wild
8 Asystasia dalzelliana Sant. Acanthaceae Terrestrial Wild
9 Asystasia gangetica (L.) T. And. Acanthaceae Terrestrial Wild
10 Azima tetracantha Lam. Salvadoraceae Terrestrial Wild
11 Benkara malabarica (Lam.) Tirvengadum Rubiaceae Terrestrial Wild
12 Breynia retusa (Dennst.) Alston Euphorbiaceae Terrestrial Wild
13 Breynia vitis-idaea (Burm.f.) Fischer Euphorbiaceae Terrestrial Wild
14 Calotropis gigantea (L.) R.Br. Apocynaceae Terrestrial Wild
15 Calotropis procera (Ait.) R.Br. Apocynaceae Terrestrial Wild
16 Carmona retusa (Vahl) Masam. Boraginaceae Terrestrial Wild
17 Chromolaena odorata (L.) King & Robinson Asteraceae Terrestrial Exotic
18 Cipadessa baccifera (Roth) Miq. Meliaceae Terrestrial Wild
19 Clerodendrum infortunatum L. Verbenaceae Terrestrial Wild
20 Clerodendrum phlomidis L.f. Verbenaceae Terrestrial Wild
21 Crotalaria juncea L. Fabaceae Terrestrial Wild
22 Datura innoxia Mill. Solanaceae Terrestrial Wild
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
Terrestrial Marshy Aquatic Semit-Aquatic
Wildlife Conservation Plan for Schedule I Faunal Species
of the Study area for the Development of Green Field Bhavanapadu Port in Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
29 | P a g e
Sl. No. Species Family Habitat Type
23 Datura metal L. Solanaceae Terrestrial Wild
24 Dichrostachys cinerea (L.) Wight & Arn. Mimosaceae Terrestrial Wild
25 Dodonaea viscosa (L.) Jacq. Sapindaceae Terrestrial Wild
26 Euphorbia nivulia L. Euphorbiaceae Terrestrial Wild
27 Flueggea leucopyrus Willd. Euphorbiaceae Terrestrial Wild
28 Flueggea virosa (Willd.) Baill. Euphorbiaceae Terrestrial Wild
29 Glycosmis mauritiana (Lam.) Tanaka Rutaceae Terrestrial Wild
30 Glycosmis pentaphylla (Retz.) DC. Rutaceae Terrestrial Wild
31 Gmelina asiatica L. Verbenaceae Terrestrial Wild
32 Grewia hirsuta Vahl. Tiliaceae Terrestrial Wild
33 Grewia villosa Willd. Tiliaceae Terrestrial Wild
34 Helicteres isora L. Sterculiaceae Terrestrial Wild
35 Hibiscus cannabinus L. Malvaceae Terrestrial Planted
36 Hibiscus subdariffa L. Malvaceae Terrestrial Planted
37 Hibiscus vitifolius L. Malvaceae Terrestrial Wild
38 Indigofera trita L.f. Fabaceae Terrestrial Wild
39 Ipomoea carnea Jacq. Convolvulaceae Aquatic Wild
40 Jatropha curcas L. Euphorbiaceae Terrestrial Planted
41 Jatropha gossypifolia L. Euphorbiaceae Terrestrial Wild
42 Jatropha tanjorensis Ellis & Saroja Euphorbiaceae Terrestrial Wild
43 Justicia adhatoda L. Acanthaceae Terrestrial Ornamental
44 Justicia betonica Linn. Acanthaceae Terrestrial Wild
45 Justicia gendarussa Burm.f. Acanthaceae Terrestrial Cultivated
46 Kleinia grandiflora (Wall. ex DC.) Rani Asteraceae Terrestrial Wild
47 Lantana camara L. Verbenaceae Terrestrial Exotic
48 Lawsonia inermis L. Lythraceae Terrestrial Planted
49 Mimosa hamata Willd. Mimosaceae Terrestrial Wild
50 Mucuna pruriens (L.) DC. Fabaceae Terrestrial Wild
51 Murraya paniculata (L.) Jack Rutaceae Terrestrial Ornamental
52 Opuntia stricta (Haw.) Haw. Cactaceae Terrestrial Wild
53 Pavetta indica L. Rubiaceae Terrestrial Wild
54 Pavetta tomentosa Roxb. ex J.E. Smith Rubiaceae Terrestrial Wild
55 Phoenix loureirii Kunth. Arecaceae Terrestrial Wild
56 Phyllanthus polyphyllus L. Euphorbiaceae Terrestrial Wild
57 Phyllanthus reticulatus Poir. Euphorbiaceae Terrestrial Wild
58 Polygonum barbatum ( L. ) H.Hara var. barbatum Polygonaceae Aquatic Wild
59 Polygonum glabrum Willdenow Polygonaceae Aquatic Wild
60 Polygonum hydropiper L. Polygonaceae Aquatic Wild
61 Randia brandisii Gamble Rubiaceae Terrestrial Wild
62 Randia dumetorum (Retz.) Poiret. Rubiaceae Terrestrial Wild
63 Randia parviflora (Thunb.) Lam. Rubiaceae Terrestrial Wild
64 Saccharum spontaneum Linn. Poaceae Aquatic Wild
65 Salicornia brachiata Miq. Chenopodiaceae Semi-aquatic Wild
66 Senna alata (L.) Roxb. Caesalpiniaceae Terrestrial Ornamental
67 Senna auriculata (L.) Roxb. Caesalpiniaceae Terrestrial Wild
68 Sesamum indicum L. Pedaliaceae Terrestrial Cultivated
69 Typha angustifolia L. Typhaceae Aquatic Wild *Source: Primary data collected by VSPL and supported through Secondary Literature
Wildlife Conservation Plan for Schedule I Faunal Species
of the Study area for the Development of Green Field Bhavanapadu Port in Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
30 | P a g e
Figure 3.4: Family-wise distribution of the Shrub Species found in the study area
3.2.3.3 Herbaceous Payment
During the primary survey a total of 343 species of herbaceous flora belonging to 60 families were
recorded which comprised of 241 herbs followed by 71 grasses and 31 species of climbers. Family
Poaceae with 71 herbaceous species is the largest family found in the study area followed by
Asteraceae with 28 species, Cyperaceae 21 species and Fabaceae with 19 species respectively (Please
Refer Figure 3.5).
Table 3.4 exhibits the important herbaceous flora (Herbs, grasses and climbers) observed in the study
area during the primary survey and supported by the secondary literature.
Table 3.4: List of Major Herbaceous Flora found in the Study Area
Sl. No. Species Family Habitat Type
Herbs
1. Acalypha brachystachya Hornem. Euphorbiaceae Terrestrial Wild
2. Acalypha indica L. Euphorbiaceae Terrestrial Wild
3. Acalypha paniculata Willd. Euphorbiaceae Terrestrial Wild
4. Acanthospermum hispidum DC. Asteraceae Terrestrial Wild
5. Acanthus ilicifolius Linn. Acanthaceae Semi-aquatic Wild
6. Achyranthes aspera L. Amaranthaceae Terrestrial Wild
7. Aerides ringens (Lindl.) C.E.C.Fischer Orchidaceae Epiphytic Wild
8. Aerva lanata (L.) Juss. ex Schultes Amaranthaceae Terrestrial wild
9. Aerva persica (Burm.f.) Merr. Amaranthaceae Terrestrial wild
10. Aerva sanguinolenta (L.) Blume Amaranthaceae Terrestrial Wild
11. Aeschynomene aspera L. Fabaceae Terrestrial Wild
12. Aloe vera (L.) Burm.f. Aloeaceae Terrestrial Wild
13. Alternanthera paronychioides A. St.-Hilaire Amaranthaceae Terrestrial Wild
14. Alternanthera pungens Kunth Amaranthaceae Terrestrial Wild
15. Alternanthera sessilis (L.) R.Br. ex DC. Amaranthaceae Aquatic Wild
0
2
4
6
8
10
12A
can
thac
eae
Ap
ocy
nac
eae
Are
cace
ae
Ast
erac
eae
Bo
ragi
nac
eae
Cac
tace
ae
Cae
salp
inia
ceae
Ch
en
op
od
iace
ae
Co
nvo
lvu
lace
ae
Eup
ho
rbia
ceae
Fab
ace
ae
Lam
iace
ae
Lyth
race
ae
Mal
vace
ae
Mel
iace
ae
Mim
osa
ceae
Ped
alia
ceae
Po
acea
e
Po
lygo
nac
eae
Ru
bia
ceae
Ru
tace
ae
Salv
ado
race
ae
Sap
ind
ace
ae
Sola
nac
eae
Ster
culia
ceae
Tilia
ceae
Typ
hac
eae
Ver
be
nac
eae
5
21
21 1
21 1
11
32
1
6
12
12
3
6
3
1 12
12
1
4
Wildlife Conservation Plan for Schedule I Faunal Species
of the Study area for the Development of Green Field Bhavanapadu Port in Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
31 | P a g e
Sl. No. Species Family Habitat Type
16. Alternanthera tenella Colla. Amaranthaceae Semi-aquatic Wild
17. Alysicarpus longifolius Wight & Arn. Fabaceae Terrestrial Wild
18. Alysicarpus monilifer (L.) DC. Fabaceae Terrestrial Wild
19. Alysicarpus rugosus DC. Fabaceae Terrestrial Wild
20. Amaranthus spinosus L. Amaranthaceae Terrestrial Wild
21. Amaranthus viridis L. Amaranthaceae Terrestrial Wild
22. Ammannia baccifera Linn. Lythraceae Semi-aquatic Wild
23. Andrographis alata (Vahl) Nees Acanthaceae Terrestrial Wild
24. Anisomeles indica (L.) Kuntze Lamiaceae Terrestrial Wild
25. Anisomeles malabarica (L.) R. Br. ex Sims. Lamiaceae Terrestrial Wild
26. Aponogeton natans (L.) Engl. & K.Krause Aponogetonaceae Aquatic Wild
27. Argemone mexicana L. Papaveraceae Terrestrial Exotic
28. Asclepias curassavica L. Asclepiadaceae Marshy Wild
29. Atylosia scarabaeoides (L.) Benth. Fabaceae Terrestrial Wild
30. Bacopa monnieri (L.) Pennell Scrophulariaceae Aquatic Wild
31. Barleria buxifolia L. Acanthaceae Terrestrial Wild
32. Barleria cristata L. Acanthaceae Terrestrial Planted
33. Barleria mysorensis Roth. Acanthaceae Terrestrial Wild
34. Barleria prionitis L. Acanthaceae Terrestrial Wild
35. Bergia ammannioides Roxb. Elatinaceae Aquatic Wild
36. Bidens pilosa L. Asteraceae Terrestrial Wild
37. Biophytum reinwardtii (Zucc.) Klotzsch. Oxalidaceae Terrestrial Wild
38. Blainvillea acmella (L.) Philipson Asteraceae Terrestrial Wild
39. Blepharis maderaspatensis (L.) Heyne ex Roth Acanthaceae Terrestrial Wild
40. Blepharis repens (Vahl) Roth Acanthaceae Terrestrial Wild
41. Blumea lacera (Burm.f) DC. Asteraceae Terrestrial Wild
42. Blumea mollis (D.Don) Merr. Asteraceae Terrestrial Wild
43. Boerhavia diffusa L. Nyctaginaceae Terrestrial Wild
44. Boerhavia erecta L. Nyctaginaceae Terrestrial Wild
45. Bulbostylis barbata (Rottb.) C.B. Clarke Cyperaceae Terrestrial Wild
46. Caralluma adscendens Wight Asclepiadaceae Terrestrial Wild
47. Celosia argentea L. Amaranthaceae Terrestrial Wild
48. Celosia polygonoides Retz. Amaranthaceae Terrestrial Wild
49. Centella asiatica (L.) Urban Apiaceae Semi-aquatic Wild
50. Cleome aspera Koen ex. DC. Capparidaceae Terrestrial Wild
51. Cleome monophylla L. Capparidaceae Terrestrial Wild
52. Cleome viscosa L. Capparidaceae Terrestrial Wild
53. Coldenia procumbens Linn. Boraginaceae Terrestrial Wild
54. Colocasia esculenta (L.) Schott Araceae Aquatic Wild
55. Commelina benghalensis L. Commelinaceae Terrestrial Wild
56. Commelina clavata Clarke Commelinaceae Terrestrial Wild
57. Commelina longifolia Lam. Commelinaceae Terrestrial Wild
58. Conyza leucantha (D.Don) Ludlow & Raven Asteraceae Terrestrial Wild
59. Corchorus aestuans L. Tiliaceae Terrestrial Wild
60. Corchorus tridens L. Tiliaceae Terrestrial Wild
61. Corchorus trilocularis L. Tiliaceae Terrestrial Wild
62. Crotalaria evolvuloides Wight ex Wight & Arn. Fabaceae Terrestrial Wild
63. Crotalaria mysorensis Roth. Fabaceae Terrestrial Wild
64. Croton bonplandianum Baill. Euphorbiaceae Terrestrial Wild
65. Curculigo orchioides Gaertn Hypoxidaceae Terrestrial Wild
66. Cyanotis tuberosa (Roxb.) Schultes & Schultes Commelinaceae Terrestrial Wild
67. Cyperus articulatus L. Cyperaceae Aquatic Wild
Wildlife Conservation Plan for Schedule I Faunal Species
of the Study area for the Development of Green Field Bhavanapadu Port in Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
32 | P a g e
Sl. No. Species Family Habitat Type
68. Cyperus difformis L. Cyperaceae Semi-aquatic Wild
69. Cyperus exaltatus Retz. Cyperaceae Aquatic Wild
70. Cyperus halpan L. Cyperaceae Semi-aquatic Wild
71. Cyperus iria L. Cyperaceae Semi-aquatic Wild
72. Cyperus pangorei Rottb. Cyperaceae Semi-aquatic Wild
73. Cyperus rotundus L. Cyperaceae Terrestrial Wild
74. Dicoma tomentosa Cass. Asteraceae Terrestrial Wild
75. Digera muricata (L.) Mart. Amaranthaceae Terrestrial Wild
76. Echinops echinatus Roxb. Asteraceae Terrestrial Wild
77. Eclipta prostrata (L.) L. Asteraceae Semi-aquatic Wild
78. Eichhornia crassipes (Mart.) Solms-Laub. Pontederiaceae Aquatic Wild
79. Elytraria acaulis (L.f.) Lindau. Acanthaceae Terrestrial Wild
80. Emilia sonchifolia (L.) DC. Asteraceae Terrestrial Wild
81. Enicostema axillare (Lam.) Raynal Gentianaceae Terrestrial Wild
82. Euphorbia geniculata Ortega Euphorbiaceae Terrestrial Wild
83. Euphorbia hirta L. Euphorbiaceae Terrestrial Wild
84. Euphorbia rosea Retz. Euphorbiaceae Terrestrial Wild
85. Euphorbia thymifolia L. Euphorbiaceae Terrestrial Wild
86. Evolvulus alsinoides (L.) L. Convolvulaceae Terrestrial Wild
87. Evolvulus nummularius (L.) L. Convolvulaceae Terrestrial Wild
88. Fimbristylis aestivalis (Retz.) Vahl. Cyperaceae Terrestrial Wild
89. Fimbristylis argentea (Rottb.) Vahl. Cyperaceae Aquatic Wild
90. Fimbristylis bisumbellata (Forssk.) Bubani Cyperaceae Semi-aquatic Wild
91. Fimbristylis complanata (Retz.) Link. Cyperaceae Semi-aquatic Wild
92. Fimbristylis dichotoma (L.) Vahl. Cyperaceae Semi-aquatic Wild
93. Fimbristylis falcata (Vahl.) Kunth. Cyperaceae Terrestrial Wild
94. Fimbristylis miliacea (L.) Vahl. Cyperaceae Semi-aquatic Wild
95. Fimbristylis ovata (Burm. F.) Kern. Cyperaceae Terrestrial Wild
96. Fimbristylis tetragona R.Br. Cyperaceae Semi-aquatic Wild
97. Giseckia pharnaceoides L. Aizoaceae Terrestrial Wild
98. Glinus lotoides Linnaeus Aizoaceae Terrestrial Wild
99. Gloriosa superba L. Colchicaceae Terrestrial Wild
100. Gnaphalium luteo-album L. Asteraceae Terrestrial Wild
101. Gnaphalium polycaulon Pers. Asteraceae Terrestrial Wild
102. Gomphrena serrata L. Amaranthaceae Terrestrial Wild
103. Grangea maderaspatana (L.) Poir. Asteraceae Terrestrial Wild
104. Hedyotis biflora (L.) Lam. Rubiaceae Terrestrial Wild
105. Hedyotis corymbosa (L.) Lam. Rubiaceae Terrestrial Wild
106. Heliotropium curasavicum L. Boraginaceae Terrestrial Wild
107. Heliotropium indicum L. Boraginaceae Terrestrial Wild
108. Hibiscus micranthus L.f. Malvaceae Terrestrial Wild
109. Hybanthus enneaspermus (L.) F. Muell. Violaceae Terrestrial Wild
110. Hydrilla verticillata (L. f.) Royle Hydrocharitaceae Aquatic Wild
111. Hygrophila auriculata (Schum) Heine Acanthaceae Marshy Wild
112. Hyptis suaveolens (L.) Poit. Lamiaceae Terrestrial Wild
113. Indigofera caerulea Roxb. Fabaceae Terrestrial Wild
114. Indigofera linifolia (L.f.) Retz. Fabaceae Terrestrial Wild
115. Indigofera linnaei Ali Fabaceae Terrestrial Wild
116. Indigofera sp. Fabaceae Terrestrial Wild
117. Indigofera trifoliata L. Fabaceae Terrestrial Wild
118. Indoneesiella echioides (L) Nees. Acanthaceae Terrestrial Wild
119. Justicia sp. Acanthaceae Terrestrial Wild
Wildlife Conservation Plan for Schedule I Faunal Species
of the Study area for the Development of Green Field Bhavanapadu Port in Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
33 | P a g e
Sl. No. Species Family Habitat Type
120. Kyllingia nemoralis (J. R. & G. Forst.) Dandy ex Cyperaceae Marshy Wild
121. Lagascea mollis Cav. Asteraceae Terrestrial Wild
122. Lemna minor L. Lemnaceae Aquatic Wild
123. Leonotis nepetiifolia (L.) R. Br. Lamiaceae Terrestrial Wild
124. Lindernia antipoda (L.) Alston Scrophulariaceae Aquatic Wild
125. Lindernia crustacea (L.) F.v.Muell. Scrophulariaceae Aquatic Wild
126. Lindernia hyssopioides (L.) Haines Scrophulariaceae Aquatic Wild
127. Lindernia parviflora (Roxb.) Haines Scrophulariaceae Aquatic Wild
128. Ludwigia adscendens (L.) H. Hara Onagraceae Aquatic Wild
129. Ludwigia perennis L. Onagraceae Aquatic Wild
130. Ludwigia peruviana (L.) Hara Onagraceae Semi-aquatic Wild
131. Malvastrum coromandelianum (L.) Garcke Malvaceae Terrestrial Wild
132. Martynia annua L. Asteraceae Terrestrial Wild
133. Merremia hastata (Hallier f.) Ooststr. Convolvulaceae Terrestrial Wild
134. Merremia tridentata (L.) Hall.f. Convolvulaceae Terrestrial Wild
135. Mollugo cerviana (L.) Ser. Aizoaceae Terrestrial Wild
136. Mollugo disticha Ser. Aizoaceae Terrestrial Wild
137. Mollugo nudicaulis Lam. Aizoaceae Terrestrial Wild
138. Mollugo pentaphylla L. Aizoaceae Terrestrial Wild
139. Monochoria hastata (L.) Solms-Laub. Pontederiaceae Aquatic Wild
140. Monochoria vaginalis (Burm. F.) Presl Pontederiaceae Aquatic Wild
141. Najas indica (Willd.) Cham. Najadaceae Aquatic Wild
142. Najas marina L. Najadaceae Aquatic Wild
143. Najas minor All. Najadaceae Aquatic Wild
144. Nelumbo nucifera Gaertn. Nymphaeaceae Aquatic Wild
145. Nothosaerva brachiata (L.) Wight Amaranthaceae Terrestrial Wild
146. Nymphaea nouchali Burm. f. Nymphaeaceae Aquatic Wild
147. Nymphaea pubescens Willd. Nymphaeaceae Aquatic Wild
148. Nymphaea rubra Roxb. ex Salisb. Nymphaeaceae Aquatic Wild
149. Nymphoides indicum (L.) Kuntze Menyanthaceae Aquatic Wild
150. Ocimum canum Sims. Lamiaceae Terrestrial Wild
151. Oldenlandia umbellata L. Rubiaceae Terrestrial Wild
152. Ottelia alismoides (L.) Pers. Hydrocharitaceae Aquatic Wild
153. Oxalis corniculata L. Oxalidaceae Terrestrial Wild
154. Parthenium hysterophorus L. Asteraceae Terrestrial Exotic
155. Pavonia odorata Willd. Malvaceae Terrestrial Wild
156. Pavonia zeylanica (L.) Cav. Malvaceae Terrestrial Wild
157. Pedalium murex L. Pedaliaceae Terrestrial Wild
158. Peristrophe bicalyculata (Forssk.) Brummitt. Acanthaceae Terrestrial Wild
159. Phyla nodiflora (L.) E. Greene Verbenaceae Aquatic Wild
160. Phyllanthus amarus Schum. & Thonn. Euphorbiaceae Terrestrial Wild
161. Phyllanthus maderaspatensis L. Euphorbiaceae Terrestrial Wild
162. Phyllanthus rotundifolius Klein ex Willd. Euphorbiaceae Terrestrial Wild
163. Phyllanthus urinaria L. Euphorbiaceae Terrestrial Wild
164. Physalis minima Linn. Solanaceae Terrestrial Wild
165. Pistia stratiotes L. Araceae Aquatic Wild
166. Polycarpaea corymbosa (L.) Lam. Caryophyllaceae Terrestrial Wild
167. Polygonum plebeium R. Br. Polygonaceae Marshy Wild
168. Portulaca oleracea L. Portulacaceae Terrestrial Wild
169. Portulaca quadrifida L. Portulacaceae Terrestrial Wild
170. Potamogeton nodosus Poir. Potamogetonaceae Aquatic Wild
171. Pseudarthria viscida (L) Wight & Arn. Fabaceae Terrestrial Wild
Wildlife Conservation Plan for Schedule I Faunal Species
of the Study area for the Development of Green Field Bhavanapadu Port in Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
34 | P a g e
Sl. No. Species Family Habitat Type
172. Psilotrichum elliotii Baker & Clarke Amaranthaceae Terrestrial Wild
173. Pulicaria wightiana C.B. Clarke Asteraceae Terrestrial Wild
174. Pupalia lappacea (L.) Juss. Amaranthaceae Terrestrial Wild
175. Pycreus globosus (All.) Reichenb. Cyperaceae Marshy Wild
176. Rauwolfia serpentina (L.) Benth. ex Kurz. Apocynaceae Terrestrial Wild
177. Rhynchosia capitata DC. Fabaceae Terrestrial Wild
178. Rhynchosia densiflora (Roth) DC. Fabaceae Terrestrial Wild
179. Rhynchosia minima (L.) DC. Fabaceae Terrestrial Wild
180. Ruellia patula Jacq. Acanthaceae Terrestrial Wild
181. Ruellia tuberosa L. Acanthaceae Terrestrial Wild
182. Salvinia molesta D.Mitch. Salviniaceae Aquatic Wild
183. Sansevieria roxburghiana Schultes & Schultes Dracaenaceae Terrestrial Wild
184. Scirpus articulatus Linn. Cyperaceae Aquatic Wild
185. Scleria lithosperma (L.) Sw. Cyperaceae Marshy Wild
186. Scoparia dulcis L. Scrophulariaceae Semi-aquatic Wild
187. Sebastiania chamaelea (L.) Muell.-Arg. Euphorbiaceae Terrestrial Wild
188. Senna hirsuta (L.) Irwin & Barneby Caesalpiniaceae Terrestrial Wild
189. Senna italica Mill. Caesalpiniaceae Terrestrial Wild
190. Senna occidentalis (L.) Link Caesalpiniaceae Terrestrial Wild
191. Senna tora (L.) Roxb. Caesalpiniaceae Terrestrial Wild
192. Sesuvium portulacastrum (L.) L. Aizoaceae Terrestrial Wild
193. Sida acuta Burm.f. Malvaceae Terrestrial Wild
194. Sida cordata (Burm. f.) Borss. Malvaceae Terrestrial Wild
195. Sida cordifolia L. Malvaceae Terrestrial Wild
196. Sida rhombifolia L. var. retusa (L.) Borss. Malvaceae Terrestrial Wild
197. Sida rhombifolia L. var. rhombifolia Malvaceae Terrestrial Wild
198. Sida spinosa Linn. Malvaceae Terrestrial Wild
199. Solanum surattense Burm. f. Solanaceae Terrestrial Wild
200. Sonchus oleraceus L. Asteraceae Terrestrial Wild
201. Spermacoce hispida L. Rubiaceae Terrestrial Wild
202. Spermacoce ocymoides Burm.f. Rubiaceae Terrestrial Wild
203. Sphaeranthus indicus Linn. Asteraceae Terrestrial Wild
204. Spilanthes calva DC. Asteraceae Marshy Wild
205. Spilanthes uliginosa Sw. Asteraceae Marshy Wild
206. Stemodia viscosa Roxb. Scrophulariaceae Marshy Wild
207. Striga asiatica (L.) Kuntze Scrophulariaceae Terrestrial Wild
208. Suaeda fruticosa Forssk. ex J.F. Gmelin Chenopodiaceae Semi-aquatic Wild
209. Suaeda nudiflora (Willd) Moq. Chenopodiaceae Semi-aquatic Wild
210. Synedrella nodiflora (L.) Gaertn. Asteraceae Terrestrial Wild
211. Taraxacum officinale F.H.Wigg Asteraceae Terrestrial Wild
212. Tephrosia purpurea (L.) Pers. Fabaceae Terrestrial Wild
213. Tephrosia villosa (L.) Pers. Fabaceae Terrestrial Wild
214. Trianthema triquetra Rottl. Aizoaceae Terrestrial Wild
215. Tribulus lanuginosis L. Zygophyllaceae Terrestrial Wild
216. Tribulus terrestris L. Zygophyllaceae Terrestrial Wild
217. Trichodesma indicum (L.) R. Br. Boraginaceae Terrestrial Wild
218. Tridax procumbens L. Asteraceae Terrestrial Wild
219. \Triumfetta pentandra A. Rich Tiliaceae Terrestrial Wild
220. Triumfetta rhomboidea Jacq. Tiliaceae Terrestrial Wild
221. Triumfetta rotundifolia Lam. Tiliaceae Terrestrial Wild
222. Turnera subulata Smith Turneraceae Terrestrial Exotic
223. Urena lobata L. subsp. lobata Malvaceae Terrestrial Wild
Wildlife Conservation Plan for Schedule I Faunal Species
of the Study area for the Development of Green Field Bhavanapadu Port in Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
35 | P a g e
Sl. No. Species Family Habitat Type
224. Urena lobata L. subsp. sinuata (L.) Borss. Malvaceae Terrestrial Wild
225. Vallisneria spiralis L. Hydrocharitaceae Aquatic Wild
226. Vanda tessellata (Roxb.) G.Don. Orchidaceae Epiphytic Wild
227. Vernonia cinerea (L.) Less. Asteraceae Terrestrial Wild
228. Trianthema triquetra Rottl. Aizoaceae Terrestrial Wild
229. Tribulus lanuginosis L. Zygophyllaceae Terrestrial Wild
230. Tribulus terrestris L. Zygophyllaceae Terrestrial Wild
231. Trichodesma indicum (L.) R. Br. Boraginaceae Terrestrial Wild
232. Tridax procumbens L. Asteraceae Terrestrial Wild
233. Triumfetta pentandra A. Rich Tiliaceae Terrestrial Wild
234. Triumfetta rhomboidea Jacq. Tiliaceae Terrestrial Wild
235. Triumfetta rotundifolia Lam. Tiliaceae Terrestrial Wild
236. Turnera subulata Smith Turneraceae Terrestrial Exotic
237. Urena lobata L. subsp. lobata Malvaceae Terrestrial Wild
238. Urena lobata L. subsp. sinuata (L.) Borss. Malvaceae Terrestrial Wild
239. Vallisneria spiralis L. Hydrocharitaceae Aquatic Wild
240. Vanda tessellata (Roxb.) G.Don. Orchidaceae Epiphytic Wild
241. Vernonia cinerea (L.) Less. Asteraceae Terrestrial Wild
Grasses
1. Aeluropus lagopoides (Linn.) Trin. ex Thw. Poaceae Semi-aquatic Wild
2. Andropogon pumilus Roxb. Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
3. Aristida adscensionis L. Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
4. Aristida funiculata Trin & Rupr. Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
5. Aristida hystrix L. Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
6. Aristida setacea Retz. Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
7. Bothriochloa bladhii (Retz.) S. T. Blake Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
8. Bothriochloa pertusa (L.) A. Camus Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
9. Brachiaria ramosa (L.) Stapf Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
10. Brachiaria remota (Retz.) Haines Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
11. Cenchrus barbatus Schumach. Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
12. Cenchrus ciliaris L. Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
13. Cenchrus setigera Vahl. Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
14. Chloris barbata Sw. Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
15. Chloris dolichostachya Lagasca Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
16. Chloris tenella Koen. ex Roxb. Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
17. Chrysopogon aciculatus (Retz.) Trin. Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
18. Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers. Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
19. Dactyloctenium aegyptium (L.) Willd. Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
20. Dactyloctenium aristatum Link. Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
21. Desmostachya bipinnata (L.) Stapf Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
22. Dicanthium annulatum (Forsk.) Stapf. Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
23. Digitaria bicornis (Lam.) Roem. & Schult. Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
24. Dinebra retroflexa (Vahl) Panzer Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
25. Echinochloa colona (L.) Link Poaceae Semi-aquatic Wild
26. Echinochloa crus-gulli (L.) P. Beauv. Poaceae Semi-aquatic Wild
27. Eleusine indica (L.) Gaertn. Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
28. Eragrostiella bifaria (Vahl) Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
29. Eragrostis maderaspatana Bor Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
30. Eragrostis minor Host Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
31. Eragrostis nigra Nees ex Steud. Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
32. Eragrostis nutans (Retz.) Nees ex Steud. Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
33. Eragrostis pilosa P. Beauv Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
Wildlife Conservation Plan for Schedule I Faunal Species
of the Study area for the Development of Green Field Bhavanapadu Port in Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
36 | P a g e
Sl. No. Species Family Habitat Type
34. Eragrostis sp. Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
35. Eragrostis unioloides (Retz.) Nees ex Steud. Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
36. Eragrostis viscosa (Retz.) Trin. Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
37. Eremopogon foveolatus (Del.) Stapf. Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
38. Heteropogon contortus (L.) P.Beauv Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
39. Imperata cylindrica (L.) Beauv. Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
40. Iseilema anthephoroides Hack. Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
41. Iseilema laxum Hack. Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
42. Manisuris myuros L. Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
43. Ophiuros exaltatus (Linnaeus) Kuntze Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
44. Oplismenus compositus (L.) P. Beauv. Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
45. Oropetium thomaeum (Linn.f.) Trin. Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
46. Panicum miliaceum L. Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
47. Panicum notatum Retz. Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
48. Panicum paludosum Roxb. Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
49. Panicum psilopodium Trin. Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
50. Panicum repens L. Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
51. Panicum trypheron Schult. Poaceae Semi-aquatic Wild
52. Paspalidium flavidum (Retz.) A. Camus. Poaceae Semi-aquatic Wild
53. Paspalum scrobiculatum L. Poaceae Semi-aquatic Wild
54. Pennisetum purpureum Schum Poaceae Terrestrial Planted
55. Phragmites karka Trin. ex Steud. Poaceae Semi-aquatic Wild
56. Rottboellia cochinchinensis (Lour.) Clayton Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
57. Sacciolepis indica (L.) Chase Poaceae Marshy Wild
58. Sehima nervosum (Rottl.) Stapf. Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
59. Sehima sulcatum (Hack.) A. Camus Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
60. Setaria italica (L.) P. Beauv Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
61. Spinifex littoreus (Burm.f.) Merr. Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
62. Sporobolus coromandelianus (Retz.) Kunth Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
63. Sporobolus indicus (L.) R.Br. Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
64. Sporobolus spicatus (Vahl.) Kunth Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
65. Sporobolus wallichii Munro ex Trimen Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
66. Themeda quadrivalvis (L.) Kuntze Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
67. Themeda triandra Forssk. Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
68. Vetiveria zizanioides (L.) Nash. Poaceae Marshy Wild
69. Themeda quadrivalvis (L.) Kuntze Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
70. Themeda triandra Forssk. Poaceae Terrestrial Wild
71. Vetiveria zizanioides (L.) Nash. Poaceae Marshy Wild
Climbers
1. Ampelocissus latifolia (Roxb.) Planch. Vitaceae Terrestrial Wild
2. Aristolochia indica L. Aristolochiaceae Terrestrial Wild
3. Cardiospermum halicacabum L. Sapindaceae Terrestrial Wild
4. Cayratia pedata (Lam.) Juss. ex Gagnep. Vitaceae Terrestrial Wild
5. Cayratia trifolia (L.) Domin. Vitaceae Terrestrial Wild
6. Cissampelos pareira L. Menispermaceae Terrestrial Wild
7. Cissus quadrangularis L. Vitaceae Terrestrial Wild
8. Cissus repanda Vahl. Vitaceae Terrestrial Wild
9. Clitoria ternatea L. Fabaceae Terrestrial Wild
10. Coccinia grandis (L.) Voigt Cucurbitaceae Terrestrial Wild
11. Cocculus hirsutus (L.) Diels Menispermaceae Terrestrial Wild
12. Convolvulus arvensis L. Convolvulaceae Terrestrial Wild
13. Cuscuta reflexa Roxb. Convolvulaceae Terrestrial Wild
Wildlife Conservation Plan for Schedule I Faunal Species
of the Study area for the Development of Green Field Bhavanapadu Port in Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
37 | P a g e
Sl. No. Species Family Habitat Type
14. Diplocyclos palmatus (L.) Jeffrey Cucurbitaceae Terrestrial Wild
15. Hemidesmus indicus (L.) R. Br. Asclepiadaceae Terrestrial Wild
16. Ichnocarpus frutescens (L.) R.Br. Asclepiadaceae Terrestrial Wild
17. Ipomoea alba L. Convolvulaceae Terrestrial Wild
18. Ipomoea aquatica Forssk. Convolvulaceae Aquatic Wild
19. Ipomoea biloba Forssk. Convolvulaceae Marshy Wild
20. Ipomoea hederifolia L. Convolvulaceae Terrestrial Wild
21. Ipomoea pes-tigridis L. Convolvulaceae Terrestrial Wild
22. Ipomoea staphylina Roem. & Schultes Convolvulaceae Terrestrial Wild
23. Kedrostis foetidissima (Jacq.) Cogn. Cucurbitaceae Terrestrial Wild
24. Leptadenia reticulata Wight & Arn. Asclepiadaceae Terrestrial Wild
25. Mikania cordata (Burm. f.) Robinson Asteraceae Marshy Wild
26. Momordica dioica Roxb. ex. Willd. Cucurbitaceae Terrestrial Wild
27. Mukia maderaspatana (L.) M. Roem. Cucurbitaceae Terrestrial Wild
28. Oxystelma esculentum R. Br. Asclepiadaceae Marshy Wild
29. Passiflora foetida L. Passifloraceae Terrestrial Wild
30. Pentatropis microphylla L. Asclepiadaceae Terrestrial Wild
31. Pergularia daemia (Forrsk.) Chiov. Asclepiadaceae Terrestrial Wild
32. Solena amplexicaulis (Lam.) Gandhi Cucurbitaceae Terrestrial Wild *Source: Primary data collected by VSPL and supported through Secondary Literature
Wildlife Conservation Plan for Schedule I Faunal Species
of the Study area for the Development of Green Field Bhavanapadu Port in Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
38 | P a g e
Figure 3.5: Family-wise distribution of the Shrub Species found in the study area
159
1
17
1 1 1 2 1 1
8
28
5 4 3 1 2 14
126
21
1 1
10
19
14
15
1 1
14
2 1 3 2 4 3 3 3 1 1 1
71
1 3 2 15
1 1
82
9
2 1 15 4
Wildlife Conservation Plan for Schedule I Faunal Species
of the Study area for the Development of Green Field Bhavanapadu Port in Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
39 | P a g e
3.2.4 FAUNAL DIVERSITY
3.2.4.1 Mammals
The list of faunal species found in the study area has been compiled with the help of secondary sources
like Forest Working Plans and was supplemented with information provided by local people during
field surveys in the study area. To study the probable occurrence of mammals in the area, 2- 3 km long
transects and trails were walked at each sampling site for any sighting and also by collecting indirect
evidence gathered by talking to locals during interaction. For compilation of list aid from Forest
Working Plans was considered. A total of 15 mammalian species reported from the study area. List of
Mammalian species compiled from secondary sources as well-found during field survey is given in
Table 3.5.
Table 3.5: Important Mammalian Species Found in the Study Area
S.No. Common Name Zoological Name IUCN Status WPA (1972) Status
1. Spotted deer Axis axis LC Sch III
2. Jackal Canis aureus LC Sch II (Part I)
3. Indian fox Vulpes benghalensis LC Sch II (Part I)
4. Jungle cat Felis chaus LC Sch II (Part I)
5. Common mongoose Herpestes edwardsii LC Sch II (Part I)
6. Black naped hare Lepus nigricollis LC Sch IV
7. Rhesus macaque Macaca mulatta LC Sch II (Part I)
8. Indian porcupine Hystrix indica LC Sch IV
9. Bandicoot rat Bandicota indica LC Sch IV
10. Three-striped palm squirrel Funambulus palmarum LC --
11. Asian Palm Civet Paradoxurus hermaphroditus LC Sch II (Part I)
12. Common Langur Presbytis entellus LC Sch II (Part I)
13. Wild Boar Sus scrofa LC Sch-III
14. Lesser dog -faced fruit bat Cynopterus brachyotis LC Sch-IV
15. Flying fox Pteropus giganteus LC Sch-III *Source: Primary data collected by VSPL and supported through Secondary Literature
Status assigned by International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN): LC=Least Concern
3.2.4.2 Herpetofauna
A total of 10 species of Amphibians and 33 species of reptiles were recorded during the survey period
(Table 3.6 & Table 3.7). Among the 22 species of reptiles 2 were turtles, 13 were lizards and 7 were
snakes.
Table 3.6: Amphibians recorded in and around the wetlands of Study Area
S.No. Common Name Zoological Name Family IUCN Status
WPA (1972) Status
1. Common Indian Toad Duttaphrynus melanostictus
Bufonidae LC --
2. Water Skipper or Skipper Frog
Euphlyctis cyanophlyctis Dicroglossidae LC --
3. Indian Pond or Green Frog Euphlyctis hexadactylus Dicroglossidae LC Sch-IV
4. Cricket Frog Fejervarya mudduraja Dicroglossidae -- --
5. Indian Bull Frog Hoplobatrachus tigerinus Dicroglossidae LC Sch-IV
6. Indian Burrowing Frog Sphaerotheca breviceps Dicroglossidae LC
Wildlife Conservation Plan for Schedule I Faunal Species
of the Study area for the Development of Green Field Bhavanapadu Port in Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
40 | P a g e
S.No. Common Name Zoological Name Family IUCN Status
WPA (1972) Status
7. Ornate Narrow-mouthed Frog
Microhyla ornata Microhylidae LC --
8. Narrow-mouthed Frog Ramanella sp. Microhylidae DD --
9. Lesser/Marbled Balloon Frog Uperodon systoma Microhylidae LC --
10. Common Tree Frog Polypedates maculatus Rhacophoridae LC -- *Source: Primary data collected by VSPL and supported through Secondary Literature
Status assigned by International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN): LC=Least Concern; DD=Data Deficient
Table 3.7: Reptiles recorded in and around the wetlands of Study Area
S.No Common Name Zoological Name IUCN Status
WPA (1972) Status
Turtles
1. Indian Starred Tortoise Geochelone elegans VU Sch-IV
2. Indian Black Turtle Melanochelys trijuga LC --
Lizards
1. Snake Skink Lygosoma punctatus LC --
2. Common Supple Skink Eutropis macularius -- --
3. Common Brahminy Skink Eutropis carinata LC --
4. Termite Hill Gecko Hemidactylus triedrus LC --
5. Southern House Gecko Hemidactylus frenatus LC --
6. Bark Gecko Hemidactylus leschnaulti -- --
7. Fan-throated Lizard Sitana ponticeriana LC --
8. Common Garden Lizard Calotes versicolor LC --
9. Forest calotes Calotes rouxi LC --
10. Indian Chameleon Chamaeleon zeylanicus VU Sch II (Part I)
11. Indian Monitor Lizard Varanus bengalensis VU Sch I (Part II)
12. South Indian Rock Agama Psammophilus dorsalis LC --
13. Common Rat Lizard Ptylas mucosus LC --
Snakes
1. Brahminy Worm Snake Ramphotyplops braminus -- --
2. Common Sand Boa Gongylophis conicus NT --
3. Red Sand Boa Eryx johnii NT --
4. Indian Rock Python Python molurus NT Sch I (Part II)
5. Indian Rat Snake Ptyas mucosa LC Sch II (Part II)
6. Common Krait* Bungarus caeruleus LC --
7. Russell's Viper* Daboia russelii Sch II (Part II) *Source: Primary data collected by VSPL and supported through Secondary Literature
Status assigned by International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN): LC=Least Concern; VU=Vulnerable, NT=Near Threatened
3.2.4.3 Avifauna
To prepare inventory of the birds in the project influence area, bird species are recorded while walking
to and from the survey areas and identification done through their calls. Birds were identified using
the field guide of birds by Ali & Ripley (1983), Grimmett et al. (1998), Fleming et al. (1984) and
Kazmierczak and Perlo (2000). During the field surveys a total of 111 species were sighted. Out of the
total 111 avi-faunal species 25 species are migratory birds (Winter & Summer visitors). The details of
Avi-faunal species reported/recorded in the study area are enumerated in Table 3.8 as follows:
Wildlife Conservation Plan for Schedule I Faunal Species
of the Study area for the Development of Green Field Bhavanapadu Port in Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
41 | P a g e
Table 3.8: Avi-Faunal Species recorded in and around the wetlands of Study Area
Sl. No.
Family English name Scientific name Habitat Status IUCN status
Guild IWPA
1. Psittacidae Alexandrine Parakeet Psittacula eupatria T R LC FR Sch- IV
2. Dicruridae Ashy Drongo Dicrurus leucophaeus T R LC IN Sch- IV
3. Sylviinae Ashy Prinia Prinia socialis T R LC IN Sch- IV
4. Alaudidae Ashy-crowned Sparrow Lark Eremopterix griseus T R LC IN Sch- IV
5. Cuculidae Asian Koel Eudynamys scolopacea T R LC FR Sch- IV
6. Ciconiidae Asian Openbill Anastomus oscitans A R LC PR Sch- IV
7. Apodidae Asian Palm Swift Cypsiurus balasiensis T R LC IN Sch- IV
8. Campephagidae Asian Paradise-flycatcher Terpsiphone paradisi T R LC IN Sch- IV
9. Sturnidae Asian Pied Starling Sturnus contra T R LC OM Sch- IV
10. Hirundinidae Barn Swallow Hirundo rustica T R LC IN Sch- IV
11. Ploceinae Baya Weaver Ploceus philippinus T R LC GR Sch- IV 12. Laniidae Bay-backed Shrike Lanius vittatus T R LC IN Sch- IV
13. Accipitridae Besra Accipiter virgatus T R LC PR Sch- IV
14. Ardeidae Black Bittern Dupetor flavicollis A R LC PI Sch- IV
15. Ardeidae Black Crowned Night Heron Nycticorax nycticorax A R LC PI Sch- IV 16. Dicruridae Black Drongo Dicrurus macrocercus T R LC IN Sch- IV
17. Accipitridae Black Kite Milvus migrans T R LC SC Sch- IV
18. Laridae Black-bellied Tern Sterna acuticauda A R NT PI Sch- IV
19. Alcedinidae Black-capped Kingfisher Halcyon pileata A R LC PI Sch- IV
20. Alaudidae Black-crowned Sparrow Lark Eremopterix nigriceps T R LC IN Sch- IV
21. Laridae Black-headed Gull Larus ridibundus A WV LC PI Sch- IV
22. Threskiornithidae Black-headed Ibis Threskiornis melanocephalus A R NT PR Sch- IV
23. Estrildidae Black-headed Munia Lonchura malacca T R LC GR Sch- IV
24. Oriolidae Black-hooded Oriole Oriolus xanthornus T R LC OM Sch- IV
25. Accipitridae Black-shouldered Kite Elanus caeruleus T R LC PR Sch- IV 26. Recurvirostridae Black-winged Stilt Himantopus himantopus A R LC IN Sch- IV
27. Turdinae Blue-capped Rock Thrush Monticola cinclorhynchus T SV LC IN Sch- IV
28. Alcedinidae Blue-eared Kingfisher Alcedo meninting A R LC PI Sch- IV
Wildlife Conservation Plan for Schedule I Faunal Species
of the Study area for the Development of Green Field Bhavanapadu Port in Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
42 | P a g e
Sl. No.
Family English name Scientific name Habitat Status IUCN status
Guild IWPA
29. Cuculidae Blue-faced Malkoha Phaenicophaeus viridirostris T R LC FR Sch- IV
30. Meropidae Blue-tailed Bee-eater Merops philippinus T R LC IN Sch- IV
31. Sylviinae Blyth's Reed Warbler Acrocephalus dumetorum T WV LC IN Sch- IV 32. Accipitridae Brahminy Kite Haliastur indus T R LC SC Sch- IV
33. Sturnidae Brahminy Starling Sturnus pagodarum T R LC OM Sch- IV
34. Jacanidae Bronze-winged Jacana Metopidius indicus A R LC OM Sch- IV
35. Laniidae Brown Shrike Lanius cristatus T WV LC IN Sch- IV
36. Capitonidae Brown-headed Barbet Megalaima zeylanica T R LC FR Sch- IV
37. Laridae Brown-headed Gull Larus brunnicephalus A WV LC PI Sch- IV
38. Ardeidae Cattle Egret Bubulcus ibis A R LC IN Sch- IV
39. Meropidae Chestnut-headed Bee-eater Merops leschenaulti T R LC IN Sch- IV
40. Ardeidae Cinnamon Bittern Ixobrychus cinnamomeus A R LC PI Sch- IV
41. Motacillidae Citrine Wagtail Motacilla citreola T WV LC IN Sch- IV
42. Rallidae Common Coot Fulica atra A R LC OM Sch- IV
43. Picidae Common Flameback Dinopium javanense T R LC IN Sch- IV
44. Scolopacidae Common Greenshank Tringa nebularia A WV LC IN Sch- IV
45. Cuculidae Common Hawk Cuckoo Hierococcyx varius T R LC IN Sch- IV
46. Upupidae Common Hoopoe Upupa epops T SV LC IN Sch- IV
47. Irenidae Common Iora Aegithina tiphia T R LC IN Sch- IV
48. Falconidae Common Kestrel Falco tinnunculus T WV LC PR Sch- IV
49. Alcedinidae Common Kingfisher Alcedo atthis A R LC PI Sch- IV
50. Rallidae Common Moorhen Gallinula chloropus A R LC OM Sch- IV
51. Sturnidae Common Myna Acridotheres tristis T R LC OM Sch- IV
52. Anatidae Common Poachard Aythya ferina A WV LC OM Sch- IV
53. Scolopacidae Common Redshank Tringa totanus A WV LC IN Sch- IV
54. Charadriidae Common Ringed Plover Charadrius hiaticula A WV LC IN Sch- IV
55. Scolopacidae Common Sandpiper Actitis hypoleucos A WV LC IN Sch- IV
56. Scolopacidae Common Snipe Gallinago gallinago A R LC IN Sch- IV
57. Sylviinae Common Tailorbird Orthotomus atrogularis T R LC IN Sch- IV
Wildlife Conservation Plan for Schedule I Faunal Species
of the Study area for the Development of Green Field Bhavanapadu Port in Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
43 | P a g e
Sl. No.
Family English name Scientific name Habitat Status IUCN status
Guild IWPA
58. Anatidae Common Teal Anas crecca A WV LC OM Sch- IV 59. Capitonidae Coppersmith Barbet Megalaima haemacephala T R LC FR Sch- IV 60. Anatidae Cotton Pygmy-Goose Nettapus coromandelianus A R LC OM Sch- IV 61. Hemiprocnidae Crested Treeswift Hemiprocne coronata T R LC IN Sch- IV 62. Scolopacidae Curlew Sandpiper Calidris ferruginea A WV LC IN Sch- IV 63. Anhingidae Darter Anhinga melanogaster A R NT PI Sch- IV 64. Columbidae Eurasian Collared Dove Streptopelia decaocta T R LC GR Sch- IV 65. Scolopacidae Eurasian Curlew Numenius arquata A WV NT IN Sch- IV 66. Strigidae Eurasian Eagle Owl Bubo bubo T R LC PR Sch- IV 67. Oriolidae Eurasian Golden Oriole Oriolus oriolus T SV LC OM Sch- IV 68. Accipitridae Eurasian Marsh Harrier Circus aeruginosus T WV LC PR Sch- IV 69. Accipitridae Eurasian Sparrowhawk Accipiter nisus T R LC PR Sch- IV 70. Threskiornithidae Eurasian Spoonbill Platalea leucorodia A R NT OM Sch- IV 71. Anatidae Eurasian Wigeon Anas penelope A WV LC OM Sch- IV 72. Anatidae Fulvous Whistling Duck Dendrocygna bicolor A R LC OM Sch- IV 73. Anatidae Gargany Teal Anas querquedula A WV LC OM Sch- IV 74. Phalacrocoracidae Great Cormorant Phalacrocorax carbo A R LC PI Sch- IV 75. Podicipedidae Great Crested Grebe Podiceps cristatus A WV LC PI Sch- IV 76. Laridae Great Crested Tern Sterna bergii A R LC PI Sch- IV 77. Cuculidae Greater Coucal Centropus sinensis T R LC IN Sch- IV 78. Ardeidae Greater Egret Casmerodius albus A R LC IN Sch- IV 79. Estrildidae Green Avadavat Amandava formosa T R VU GR Sch- IV 80. Scolopacidae Green Sandpiper Tringa ochropus A WV LC IN Sch- IV 81. Phasianidae Grey Francolin Francolinus pondicerianus T R LC OM Sch- IV 82. Ardeidae Grey Heron Ardea cinerea A R LC PI Sch- IV 83. Motacillidae Grey Wagtail Motacilla cinerea T WV LC IN Sch- IV 84. Charadriidae Grey-headed Lapwing Vanellus cinereus A WV LC IN Sch- IV 85. Corvidae House Crow Corvus splendens T R LC SC Sch- IV 86. Passerinae House Sparrow Passer domesticus T R LC GR Sch- IV 87. Apodidae House Swift Apus affinis T R LC IN Sch- IV 88. Phalacrocoracidae Indian Cormorant Phalacrocorax fuscicollis A R LC PI Sch- IV
Wildlife Conservation Plan for Schedule I Faunal Species
of the Study area for the Development of Green Field Bhavanapadu Port in Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
44 | P a g e
Sl. No.
Family English name Scientific name Habitat Status IUCN status
Guild IWPA
89. Bucerotidae Indian Grey Hornbill Ocyceros birostris T R LC FR Sch- IV 90. Caprimulgidae Indian Nightjar Caprimulgus asiaticus T R LC IN Sch- IV
91. Phasianidae Indian Peafowl Pavo cristatus T R LC OM Sch- I
92. Pittidae Indian Pitta Pitta brachyura T R LC IN Sch- IV 93. Ardeidae Indian Pond Heron Ardeola grayii A R LC PI Sch- IV 94. Turdinae Indian Robin Saxicoloides fulicata T R LC IN Sch- IV 95. Coraciidae Indian Roller Coracias benghalensis T R LC IN Sch- IV 96. Estrildidae Indian Silverbill Lonchura malabarica T R LC GR Sch- IV 97. Ardeidae Intermediate Egret Mesophoyx intermedia A R LC IN Sch- IV 98. Scolopacidae Jack Snipe Lymnocryptes minimus A WV LC IN Sch- IV 99. Timaliinae Jungle Babbler Turdoides striatus T R LC IN Sch- IV
100. Corvidae Jungle Crow Corvus macrorhynchos T R LC SC Sch- IV 101. Sturnidae Jungle Myna Acridotheres fuscus T R LC OM Sch- IV 102. Sylviinae Jungle Prinia Prinia sylvatica T R LC IN Sch- IV 103. Scolopacidae Kentish Plover Charadrius alexandrinus A WV LC IN Sch- IV 104. Campephagidae Large Cuckooshrike Coracina macei T R LC IN Sch- IV 105. Turdinae Large Grey Babbler Turdoides malcolmi T R LC IN Sch- IV 106. Columbidae Laughing Dove Streptopelia senegalensis T R LC GR Sch- IV 107. Cuculidae Lesser Coucal Centropus bengalensis T R LC IN Sch- IV 108. Anatidae Lesser Whistling Duck Dendrocygna javanica A R LC OM Sch- IV 109. Laridae Lesser-crested Tern Sterna bengalensis A WV LC PI Sch- IV 110. Phalacrocoracidae Little Cormorant Phalacrocorax niger A R LC PI Sch- IV 111. Ardeidae Little Egret Egretta garzetta A R LC IN Sch- IV
Where: T-Terrestrial; W-water bird; R-Resident; WR-Widespread resident; WV-Winter visitor; SV-Summer visitor; WWV-Wisespread winter visitor; BR- Breading resident; LC-Least concern; VU-Vulnerable; EN-Endangered; NT-Near threatened; IN-Insectivorous; OM-Omnivorus; PR-Predators; FR-Frugivorous; PI- Piscivorous; GR-Granivorous; NE-Nectarivorous; SC-Scavengers; S I-Schedule I; S IV-Schedule IV; IWPA-Indian Wildlife Protection Act.
Wildlife Conservation Plan for Schedule I Faunal Species
of the Study area for the Development of Green Field Bhavanapadu Port in Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
45 | P a g e
3.2.4.4 RET status of Fauna
Out of the total 15 mammalian species recorded from the study area Seven (07) species were classified
under Scheduled-II (Par-I) and Three (03) species under Schedule-III and four (04) species under
Schedule-IV. While No mammalian Species were listed under Schedule-I of the Wildlife (Protection),
Act, 1972.
No mammalian species is listed under IUCN Red list of Threatened Species Version 2019.3 as Rare,
Endangered and Threatened (RET) Species.
With regards to amphibian species two (02) species were listed under Schedule-IV while no schedule-
I, II & III species were found in the study area. Similarly no herpetofauna of ecological importance were
found in the study area as per IUCN Red List.
Among Reptiles two (02) Schedule-I, three (03) Schedule-II and One (01) Schedule-IV species were
found in the study area. With regards to IUCN Red list of Threatened Species Version 2019.3 as Rare,
Endangered and Threatened (RET) Species, three (03) Vulnerable and three (03) Near Threatened
Reptile species were found in the study area.
With regards to the avifaunal species one (01) Schedule-I were reported/observed in the study area,
whereas three (03) avi-faunal specie are listed as Near Threatened (NT) and one (01) species is listed
under Vulnerable category of IUCN Red list of Threatened Species Version 2019.3.
3.2.4.5 Wildlife Proteted Area
No Ecological Sensitive location (National Park, Wildlife Sancturies, Biosphere reserves) are located
within the 10 km radius of the proposed project.
Wildlife Conservation Plan for Schedule I Faunal Species
of the Study area for the Development of Green Field Bhavanapadu Port in Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
46 | P a g e
4 CONSERVATION STATUS
4.1 BACKGROUND
The IUCN Red List is the world's most comprehensive inventory of the global conservation status of
plant and animal species. It uses a set of criteria to evaluate the extinction risk of thousands of species
and subspecies. These criteria are relevant to all species and all regions of the world. With its strong
scientific base, the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List is recognized as the
most authoritative guide to the status of biological diversity. The Red list of threatened species,
prepared by IUCN has listed 132 species of plants and animals as Critically Endangered (CR), the most
threatened category, from India during its assessment in 2019 Ver-3. Plants seemed to be the most
threatened life form with 60 species being listed as Critically Endangered (CR) and 141 as Endangered
(EN). The Critically Endangered (CR) list included 18 species of amphibians, 14 fishes and 10 mammals.
There are also 15 bird species in the category. The agency listed 310 species as endangered (EN) ones,
including 69 fishes, 38 mammals and 32 amphibians.
Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972, amended on 17thJanuary 2003, is an Act to provide for the protection
of wild animals, birds and plants and for matters connected therewith or ancillary or incidental thereto
with a view to ensuring the ecological and environmental security of the country. Some of the sighted
fauna was given protection by the Indian Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 by including them in different
schedules. During the survey, a total of three (03) Schedule I species including two (02) reptiles and
one (01) avifaunal species were reported in the Bhavanapdu port and its environs (10 km radius).
4.2 DECLINE OF WILDLIFE
Biological evolution on earth is associated with extinction of older species and descent of new species
but the disappearance of species from the surface of the earth has speeded up 1000 to 10,000 times
as compared to the natural disappearance, due to destructive activities of man. Important reasons
for decline of wildlife are:
Fragmentation, degradation and loss of habitat
Hunting and poaching
Man-animal conflict
Pollution
Climate change
Overexploitation
4.3 OBJECTIVES OF CONSERVATION PLAN
To prepare the list of flora and fauna of the proposed Bhavanapdu Port and its environs falling
within 10-kilometer radius area from the project site and classification as per schedules of
Wildlife Protection Act, 1972.
To evaluate the ecological sensitivity of the area.
To explore whether the area forms a corridor for any scheduled wildlife.
To locate the Sanctuary, National Park, Bio-sphere reserve, Tiger/ Elephant reserve or
notified Eco- sensitive zones falling in 10-kilometer radius area from the proposed site.
Wildlife Conservation Plan for Schedule I Faunal Species
of the Study area for the Development of Green Field Bhavanapadu Port in Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
47 | P a g e
To evaluate the possible threat of wildlife in the area and possible impact of mining on flora
and fauna.
To prepare a comprehensive Conservation Plan for the schedule I faunal species (Table 4.1)
4.4 MAMMALS, BIRDS &HERPETOFAUNA OF THE PROJECT AREA (10 km radius)
(Belonging to schedule I of Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972
Table 4.1: List of Schedule I species
S.No. Common Name Scientific name Wildlife
Schedule
Reptiles
1. Indian Monitor Lizard Varanus bengalensis Schedule I (Part II)
2. Indian Rock Python Pyhton molurus Schedule I (Part II)
Avifauna (Birds) 1. Indian Peafowl Pavo cristatus Schedule I
Wildlife Conservation Plan for Schedule I Faunal Species
of the Study area for the Development of Green Field Bhavanapadu Port in Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
48 | P a g e
4.5 CONSERVATION STATUS OF REPTILES
Indian Monitor Lizard (Varanus bengalensis)
Taxonomy
Kingdom Phylum Class Order Family
Animalia Chordata Reptilia Squamata Varanidae
Taxon name: Varanus bengalensis (Daudin,
1802)
Common name: Bengal Monitor Lizard,
Clouded Monitor, Common Indian Monitor
Asssessment Information
Red List Category & Criteria: Near
Threatened A2d ver 3.1
Year Published: 2021
Date Assessed: June 8, 2018
Justification
The species is heavily hunted in a variety of habitats across South Asia and continental Southeast Asia.
Extreme local declines have been reported within 30 years (estimated to correspond to three
generations) for most of Southeast Asia outside Malaysia. If the Southeast Asian Varanus nebulosus is
revalidated as a full species, it will consequently likely warrant a Vulnerable or Near Threatened listing,
although Southeast Asian populations of V. bengalensis as presently understood rather reflect a
geographically restricted distribution. More data on rates of any decline in India are needed, the main
part of the global range. It is strongly suspected that local population declines of em style="">V.
bengalensis will increase across the species' global range, and the species appears to be close to
qualifying for a threatened category, and is therefore assessed Near Threatened.
Previously Published Red List Assessments
2010 - Least Concern (LC) https://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2010-4.RLTS.T164579A5909661.en
Geographic Range
The Indian Monitor Lizard is found throughout Afghanistan, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal, India, Sri
Lanka, Southern China, Myanmar, Viet Nam, Lao PDR, south-eastern Iran and as far as Java and the
Wildlife Conservation Plan for Schedule I Faunal Species
of the Study area for the Development of Green Field Bhavanapadu Port in Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
49 | P a g e
Anambas Islands in Indonesia. The Indian Monitor Lizard is naturally absent from the Chao Phraya
River Central Flood Plain in Thailand, a historically swampy area unsuitable for this typically dry forest
species.
Country Occurrence: Afghanistan; Bangladesh; Cambodia; China (Yunnan); India (Assam, Gujarat,
Himachal Pradesh, Jammu-Kashmir, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, Tamil Nadu); Indonesia (Jawa); Iran,
Islamic Republic of; Lao People's Democratic Republic; Malaysia; Myanmar; Nepal; Pakistan; Sri Lanka;
Thailand; Viet Nam
Native, Possibly Extant (resident): Indonesia (Sumatera)
Distribution Map
Wildlife Conservation Plan for Schedule I Faunal Species
of the Study area for the Development of Green Field Bhavanapadu Port in Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
50 | P a g e
Appearance
The Indian Monitor Lizard has a white belly striped with dark crossbars and grey or yellow spots
(specifically in the eastern part of the range). The dorsal side of the young monitors has a series of
yellow spots with dark transverse bars connecting them. When these mature, the ground colour turns
to light brown or grey wuth dark spots giving them a speckled appearance.
Habitat and Behavior
The Indian Monitor Lizard is a diurnal species and is mostly terrestrial that inhabits forests and forest
edges along with plantations including oil palm, and agricultural areas. It has been found in a variety
of habitats, both arid and moist, from scrublands to forests, at moderate to high elevations. The Indian
Monitor Lizards is not found inswampy areas. Because the species has a three-year age at maturity
and a maximum lifespan of 20 years, the average age at reproduction might be 11 years.
Bengal monitors are typically solitary and live on the ground, while the young are frequently sighted
on trees. Clouded monitors, on the other hand, are more likely to climb trees. Bengal and yellow
monitors are sympatric, however their habitats are partially divided, as Bengal monitors prefer forest
to agricultural areas. They are normally shy and avoid interacting with humans. They have
keen eyesight and can detect human movement from a distance of approximately 250 metres. When
cornered, a few individuals may bite, but this is uncommon.
Food and Feeding Habits
It feeds on spiders, insects, snails, crabs, frogs, small mammals, birds, lizards and snakes. This
particular species is also known to scavenge. Large adults may climb up vertical tree trunks, stalking
and capturing roosting bats. The species is omnivorous, eating a wide variety of invertebrates and
vertebrates. Beetles and their larvae are the most common invertebrate prey, followed by
orthopterans, maggots, caterpillars, centipedes, scorpions, crabs, crayfish, snails, termites, ants, and
earwigs. Larger individuals eat a lot of vertebrate prey, such as toads and frogs and their eggs, fish,
lizards, snakes, rats, squirrels, hares, musk shrews, and birds, in addition to invertebrates.
Threats in the Study Area
The Indian Monitor Lizard could be primarily threatened by hunting as it is hunted commercially for
its ksin (domestically) and its meat is usually eaten. The fat of Indian Monitor Lizard is also used in the
making of traditional medicine.
Wildlife Conservation Plan for Schedule I Faunal Species
of the Study area for the Development of Green Field Bhavanapadu Port in Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
51 | P a g e
Indian Rock Python (Python molurus)
Taxonomy
Kingdom Phylum Class Order Family
Animalia Chordata Reptilia Squamata Pythonidae
Taxon name: Python molurus (Linnaeus, 1758)
Common name: Indian Rock Python
Asssessment Information
Red List Category & Criteria: Near Threatened
A2d ver 3.1
Year Published: 2021
Date Assessed: September 5, 2019
Justification
Listed as Near Threatened because of population decline (estimated to be close to 30% over the last
ten years) inferred from over-exploitation, habitat destruction, degradation and general apathy.
Geographic Range
The Indian Rock Python is widely found in Sri Lanka and India having subpopulations in North-eastern
Pakistan and Nepal. I t is also found along the India-Bangladesh border.Many Indian sub-populations
have been identified across the country.
Native, Extant (resident): Bangladesh; Bhutan; India (Andhra Pradesh, Arunachal Pradesh, Assam,
Bihar, Chattisgarh, Delhi, Goa, Gujarat, Himachal Pradesh, Jammu-Kashmir, Karnataka, Kerala,
Madhya Pradesh, Meghalaya, Orissa, Punjab, Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu, Uttar Pradesh, Uttaranchal, West
Bengal); Nepal; Pakistan; Sri Lanka
Distribution Map
Wildlife Conservation Plan for Schedule I Faunal Species
of the Study area for the Development of Green Field Bhavanapadu Port in Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
52 | P a g e
Wildlife Conservation Plan for Schedule I Faunal Species
of the Study area for the Development of Green Field Bhavanapadu Port in Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
53 | P a g e
Appearance
The Indian rock python's head is small, and its body is stocky. It has labial fossettes and can extend up
to six metres in length; however it is normally not more than four or five. The Indian Rock Python is
light green in colour with large scattered spots on its back. Ab ibverted-Y pattern covers the sides and
head over a pink background. The head has a black pattern that starts at the neck and ends at the
nose, resembling a spear tip. Its tail is prehensile at the end.
Habitat and Behavior
The Indian Rock Python has been reported to be found in forested areas, though it is also found in
mangroves, semi-arid forests and grasslands, streams, marshes and rivers. It can be found in moist
rocky places near streams and pools, huge rotting logs, large burrows, caves, crevices, and old and
wrecked structures. It is a great climber and swimmer. This species may live in a wide variety of
environments, including marshes, swamps, rainforests, rocky terrain, rice fields, riverbanks, and close
to tiny villages, but it must constantly be near a stable source of water.
Food and Feeding Habits
They are large predators that eat mammals, birds, and reptiles. Large specimens can consume large
animals like wild boar and young deer, although they prefer smaller prey like rat-sized rodents.
Threats in the Study Area
The Indian Rock Python could be primarily threatened due to local market for the illegal demand in
leather industry. Habitat degradation and habitat loss as a result of anthropogenic activities could also
pose a great threat to Indian Rock Python. Mining has been a great threat to this species in the Easten
Ghats of India.
Wildlife Conservation Plan for Schedule I Faunal Species
of the Study area for the Development of Green Field Bhavanapadu Port in Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
54 | P a g e
Indian Peafowl (Pavo cristatus)
Taxonomy
Kingdom Phylum Class Order Family
Animalia Chordata Aves Galliformes Phasianidae
Taxon name: Pavo cristatus (Linnaeus, 1758)
Common name: Indian Peafowl, Common
Peafowl, Peafowl
Asssessment Information
Red List Category & Criteria: Least Concern ver 3.1
Year Published: 2016
Date Assessed: October 1, 2016
Justification
This species has an extremely large range, and hence does not approach the thresholds for Vulnerable
under the range size criterion (Extent of Occurrence <20,000 km2 combined with a declining or
fluctuating range size, habitat extent/ quality or population size and a small number of locations or
severe fragmentation). The population trend appears to be stable, and hence the species does not
approach the thresholds for Vulnerable under the population trend criterion (,30% decline over tem
years or three generations). The population size has not been quantified, but it is not believed to
approach the thresholds for Vulnerable under the population size criterion (<10,000 mature
indivioduals with a continuing decline estimated to be <10% in ten years or three generations or with
a specified population structure). For these reasons the species is evaluated as Least Concern.
Previously Published Red List Assessments
2012 - Least Concern (LC) http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2012-1.RLTS.T22679435A40098247.en
2009 - Least Concern (LC)
2008 - Least Concern (LC)
2004 - Least Concern (LC)
2000 - Lower Risk/least concern (LR/lc)
1994 - Lower Risk/least concern (LR/lc)
1988 - Lower Risk/least concern (LR/lc)
Wildlife Conservation Plan for Schedule I Faunal Species
of the Study area for the Development of Green Field Bhavanapadu Port in Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
55 | P a g e
Geographic Range
The Indian sub-continent is the natural habitat of the Indian Peafowl. It is found in good numbers in
Indian Territory ranging from Outer Himalayas through vast stretch of the country including the
Peninsula. It is also found in Pakistan, Nepal and Sri Lanka. The arid deserts of Rajasthan, the
riverbanks of Gujarat and Madhya Pradesh, the foothills of the Himalayas in Uttar Pradesh and the
forests of Haryana – these are considered to be the major and commonly-known habitats of peacocks
in India.
Native: Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Nepal, Pakistan, Sri Lanka
Introduced: Australia, Bahamas, New Zealand, and United States (Hawaiian Is.)
Distribution Map
Wildlife Conservation Plan for Schedule I Faunal Species
of the Study area for the Development of Green Field Bhavanapadu Port in Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
56 | P a g e
Appearance
The Indian peacock has iridescent blue and green plumage. The peacock "tail", known as a "train",
consists not of tail quill feathers, but highly elongated upper tail coverts. These feathers are marked
with eyespots, best seen when a peacock fans his tail. Both sexes of all species have a crest atop the
head. The Indian peahen has a mixture of dull grey, brown, and green in her plumage. The female also
displays her plumage to ward off female competition or signal danger to her young. Male peacock has
a spectacular glossy green long tail feathers that may be more than 60 percent of the bird’s total body
length. These feathers have blue, golden green and copper colored ocelli (eyes). The long tail feathers
are used for making rituals like court ship displays. The feathers are arched in to a magnificent fan
shaped for macros the back of the bird and almost touching the found on both sides. Females do not
have these graceful tail feathers. They have the fan like crest with whitish face and throat, chest nut
brown crown and hind neck, metallic green upper breast and mantle, white belly and brown back
rump and tail. Their primaries are dark brown.
Habitat and Behavior
The scrub jungles and forest edges are the natural habitat of this bird; has affinity towards moist &
dry deciduous and semiarid biomes. It is also found along streams with good vegetation and in
agricultural fields and in close proximity with the human settlements. Habitat mosaic of scrub and
open areas with ample sites for “dust bathing” and “lekking”. Dust bathing is critical as this bird has to
condition its feathers and remove feather-degrading bacteria and other external parasites. The
peafowl are forest birds that nest on the ground. The peafowl are terrestrial feeders but roost in trees.
It has got a loud scream that can scary many enemies. The life expectancy is about 10-15 years.
Food and Feeding Habits
Peafowls are omnivores, eating plant parts, flower petals, seed heads, insects and other arthropods,
reptiles and amphibians. In the study area at some places, dense tree canopy cover supports good
insect diversity which is very common food for peafowls.
Threats in the Study Area
The Indian Peafowl could be primaly threatened by activities such as hunting or poaching due to
culture and mythology reasons. Adult peafowl can usually escape ground predators by flying into
trees.
o For aging in groups provides some safety as there are more eyes to look out for predators.
o Habitat loss, specially the shortage of tall trees in and around the villages for roosting and for
providing shade during hot summer months.
o Shortage of drinking water for the birds during the hot summer days.
o Casualties caused by eating chemically treated agricultural crop seeds.
o Illegal hunting by some communities.
Wildlife Conservation Plan for Schedule I Faunal Species
of the Study area for the Development of Green Field Bhavanapadu Port in Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
57 | P a g e
5 CONSERVATION ACTION PLAN
5.1 INTRODUCTION
Each organism on this earth has a unique place in food chain that helps contribute to the ecosystem
in its own special way. After independence India saw exponential growth as a result more and more
forest land has been destroyed for development activities. Hence natural habitats of animals and
plants are being destroyed which result many of the animals and birds are getting endangered. To
protect these birds and animals many initiatives like Project tiger, Project elephant, Crocodile
Conservation Project etc. have been taken up. Along with these conservation projects of the wild
animals, few schemes that are worked upon to protect the biodiversity and minimize the mortality of
critically endangered and threatened animals have also initiated. Instead of numerous initiatives in
India, the wildlife is facing many problems in terms of survival by way of habitat loss, human invasion
of inviolate spaces and developmental related activities obstructing the natural corridors of migrating
animals. Hence it is necessary to conserve the forest and its wildlife for maintaining ecological
balance. Wildlife conservation is the attempt to protect endangered animal and plant species, along
with their natural habitat. The main objective is to make sure that their habitats will be preserved so
that the future generations of both wildlife and human can enjoy it. To conserve wildlife awareness
must be created among the people about its importance and involvement of local people is must in
the wildlife protection.
Following action plan and financial projection has been proposed for implementation of the
conservation plan in the project area.
5.2 ACTION PLAN
5.2.1 SPECIAL STAFF FOR THE PROTECTION AND ANTI-POACHING
Special Staffs will be deployed by the forest department for patrolling and protection of the fauna
and flora under their jurisdiction because the regular staff deployed for this purpose, due to their
busy schedule, is unable to perform their work properly. Each of the special staff will be equipped
with dress, raincoat, gumboots, sticks and wireless set for communication. Financial burden for the
same has been included in financial projection of this report.
5.2.2 ESTABLISHMENT OF EMERGENCY RESPONSE MECHANISM
Immediate response is crucial to manage all conflict situations. A trained Emergency Response (ER)
team consisting of an officer not below the rank of Assistant Conservator of Forests, one qualified
veterinarian, and a minimum of five trained support staff may be formed in the identified conflict area.
The Forest Division should have a well-trained operational ER team. Each ER team should be equipped
with chemical capture equipment, drugs, appropriate cages, etc. and should wear specially designed
uniforms so that they are easily identifiable during the operation. They should also have specially
designed baffle boards for protection. The protocol for Emergency Response should be periodically
rehearsed and reviewed to incorporate corrective measures to make it more efficient.
Establishing such well-advertised ER teams that respond effectively and quickly to conflict situations
will help diffuse the usual public outrage and retaliation that invariably follows such conflicts. It will
Wildlife Conservation Plan for Schedule I Faunal Species
of the Study area for the Development of Green Field Bhavanapadu Port in Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
58 | P a g e
also harness the goodwill of local communities. In the long term, the efficient working of the ER teams
will prevent escalation and spread of conflict. It will also prevent the situation from going out of
control with people taking the law in their own hands.
5.2.3 REDUCING MAN WILDLIFE CONFLICTS
Unauthorized entry into forest for illegal grazing, cutting or poaching are the major causes for Man-
Wildlife conflicts. These practices will be reduced as much as possible.
5.2.4 PROTECTION AND DEVELOPMENT OF HABITAT
Activities which may damage the habitat will be kept on watch.
5.2.5 CREATING SMALL WATER HOLE/ KHELIS
Location of water holes will be suggested by the local forest department in consultation with the
Gram Panchayat (Sarpanch).
5.2.6 CREATION OF DRINKING WATER FACILITY
Water is the most important factors to all birds and animals. During drier season water availability in
forest is limited, hence to provide water safely places suitable for mini watersheds will be identified
in the core as well as in the buffer zone to store rainwater, so that water available throughout the
year.
5.2.7 CONSERVING AND RESTORING OF FOREST AREA WATER BODIES
Promote traditional techniques and practices for conserving ponds and other sources of water in the
forest area.
5.2.8 PROVISION FOR ENVIRONMENT RESTORATION
Ensure provision for environmental restoration during commissioning and after decommissioning of
project.
5.2.9 HABITAT IMPROVEMENT ACTION PLAN
Habitat improvement programme in the different villages will be under taken in the study area for
shelter of the wild animals. This will be achieved by plantation of local varieties of the tree species
near villages in study area. Plantation will also be carried in some forest patches identified by local
forest department.
Habitat improvement programme will include plantation of various plants species like, Abultilon
indicum (Kanghi), Acacia ferruginea (Safed Khair), Acacia leucophloea (Safed babul), Achras sapota
(chikoo), Albizia lebbeck (Siris), Artocarpus heterophyllus (Jack fruit tree), Azadirachta indica (Neem
tree), Citrus limon (Bara nimbu), Dalbergia latifolia (Shisham), Ficus elastic (Indian Rubber Tree), Ficus
religiosa (Peepal tree), Juniperus communis (Common juniper), Magnifera indica (Mango Tree), etc.
and other species reported from the study are should be taken in to priority. In order to improve
vegetation cover, it is suggested to carry out extensive afforestation program different phases. These
Wildlife Conservation Plan for Schedule I Faunal Species
of the Study area for the Development of Green Field Bhavanapadu Port in Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
59 | P a g e
species will help to provide habitat for faunal species, and also increase the species diversity and
maintain the naturalness of the surrounding area.
5.2.10 SEED/ SAPLINGS DISTRIBUTION AMONG THE VILLAGERS
During this habitat improvement programme the seeds and Saplings of indegenious fruit trees/plants
will be distributed in the various villages of the study area. Compost packets will be also provided at
the intervals of every six months by the proponent (in consultation of forest department).
5.2.11 TRAINING AND AWARENESS PROGRAMME
This is the most important aspect of wildlife conservation. People will be educated regarding the
importance of wildlife conservation through mass publicity by installing sign boards, conducting audio
visual classes and distributing literature in respective villages in the Study area. Experts in the field of
wildlife conservation will also be invited to deliver talks through slides.
5.2.12 PROMOTION OF RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES
To reduce the dependence on forests for fuelwood, promotion and distribution of renewable energy
sources such as solar power cookers, biogas etc. will be promoted and distributed in the villages
affected by the project activities.
5.2.13 FOREST FIRE PROTECTION MEASURES
Forest fire protection measures for early detection, control and management of forest fire during the
fire season in the project affected villages shall be carried out.
5.2.14 PROCUREMENT OF EQUIPMENT’S
Various wildlife researches and monitoring equipment’s such as as Nets, tranquilizers and cage will be
procured for proper rescue and translocation of wildlife during emergency situation.
Signboards: Sign-board strobe displayed
Wildlife has right to move through roads
Reptiles crossing; drive slowly
Plant tree saplings with your name
Fire destroys both the plants and animals
Capturing/ hunting wild animals is punishable offence
Don’t throw burning objects
Wildlife is our precious heritage
Inform forest officer if wildlife is in distress
5.3 MONITORING PLAN
Wildlife monitoring or estimation is a very important aspect for management of a Protected Area. It
becomes more relevant and important, especially for a newly constituted Protected Area and the
Landscape, where very less data is available on this subject. On account of above facts, a two-stage/
layer monitoring protocol is proposed for estimation of Wildlife in the Project study area; is
mentioned as below:
Wildlife Conservation Plan for Schedule I Faunal Species
of the Study area for the Development of Green Field Bhavanapadu Port in Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
60 | P a g e
i. Protocol based on monitoring of Scheduled Species under Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 using
Daily/ Range level/ Long term Patrols.
ii. Monitoring for Vegetation & RET Species
5.3.1 PROTOCOL BASED MONITORING OF SCHEDULED SPECIES UNDER WILDLIFE
(PROTECTION) ACT, 1972 USING DAILY/ RANGE LEVEL/ LONG TERM PATROLS.
Daily, range level and long-range patrolling are important source for getting information of presence
or absence of different wild animals in different areas of project area and other parts of forest division.
Each patrolling team should use a GPS unit and a digital camera. Date, time and GPS coordinates of
beginning of patrol should be recorded. Preferably the GPS unit shall be switched on throughout the
patrol in a track log mode. The mode of patrol is also recorded, e.g., on foot, bicycle, motorcycle,
vehicle etc. Signs and sightings of all Scheduled species while on patrol is recorded by entering the
GPS coordinate, date and time of the sighting/sign as well as recording a digital picture of the same if
possible.
Format for recording the Schedule Species presence
Date --------------- Time --------------- Range------------Beat ------------
GPS Coordinate:--------------- Division Name-------------
Put tick (√) marks in appropriate column
S.no.
1. Habitat Type note the habitat type
2. Male Tracks recorded Not recorded
3. Female Tracks recorded Not recorded
4. Cubs/Eggs Tracks recorded Not recorded
5. Other Carnivore Tracks Present Not present
6. Leopard Present Not present
7. Sloth bear Present Not present
5.3.2 FOREST FIRE PROTECTION MEASURESMONITORING OF VEGETATION AND RET
SPECIES
Line transact method shall be used monitoring of Vegetation and RET Species in the respective forest
beats under the Forest Ranges and Divisions. Sampling for Vegetation and RET species and any impact
due to human distrurbance etc. will be done only once on a transect.
Forest beat will be the sampling unit, and sampling will be done along the established line
transect.
The beginning and end point coordinates of the line transect need to be recorded using a GPS
unit.
Vegetation would need to be sampled every 400 m along the transect.
The vegetation would need to be quantified visually at the following categories for each plot:
Wildlife Conservation Plan for Schedule I Faunal Species
of the Study area for the Development of Green Field Bhavanapadu Port in Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
61 | P a g e
A. 15 m. radius circular plots:
Within a distance of approximately 15 m of the observer the five most dominant trees (over-
story, all vegetation >6 fit height, including bamboo) need to be listed in the order of
dominance (abundance)
The observer needs to list the 5 most dominant shrub species (middle story, vegetation >40
cm and <6fit) in order of dominance (abundance) within 15m of the location. He needs to
categorize shrub density (under-story vegetation) as absent, very low (25%), low (50%),
medium (75%), and dense (100%). Shrubs will be assessed on five-point scale (0 to 4 i.e.,
absent to most abundant) for density estimation.
If weeds are present, their abundance needs to be scored on 0 to 4 scale (0 being absent and
4 high abundance) and the three most common weeds seen in 15 m need to be listed in order
of abundance.
Within the same 15 m distance the observer needs to record number of signs of looping,
wood cutting and presence/absence of human foot trail. Mention needs to be made if people
and or livestock are seen from the plot.
The observer needs to visually quantify the canopy cover at the location. The observer should
subjectively classify the proportion of the sky above him that is covered by canopy foliage
and categorize it into <0.1,0.1 -0.2,0.2-0.4,0.4-0.6,0.6- 0.8, >0.8 canopy cover.
A mention needs to be made in the data sheet regarding the number of permanent human
settlements, human population, and livestock population present in the beat (to the best of
his knowledge).
A mention needs to be made based on the observers’ knowledge if any non-timber forest
product is collected from the beat. If yes, which NTFP and to score the magnitude of collection
on a 4-point scale (0- no collection 4-high rate of collection).
If the beat was burnt (natural or management practice), the proportion burnt in the past 3
years need to be mention in the datasheet.
Data Sheet-3A VEGETATION (15m plot)
Name of Observer:……… Date:……… Forest Circle: ………… Forest Division…………
Range:…………………… Beat:……… ID No. of Line Transect: ................…………
Plot No.
Can
op
yCo
ver(
0-
1)
Tree Species (Descending Order of dominance, all veg. >6fit)
Shrub Species (Descending Order of dominance, all veg. >20cm &<6fit)
Shrub Abundance 0 to 4 0-absent to 4- very high
Weed/invasive Species (Descending Order-of dominance)
Bro
ad
vege
tati
on
& t
err
ain
for
the
plo
t
1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3
* Bamboo more than 2 m., should be entered in "tree" category, less than 2m in "shrub" category.
Wildlife Conservation Plan for Schedule I Faunal Species
of the Study area for the Development of Green Field Bhavanapadu Port in Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
62 | P a g e
Data Sheet-3B Human Disturbance
Name of Observer: ………Date: …………Forest Circle: ………………Forest Division…………
Range: ……………………… Beat: …………ID No. of Line Transect: ………………………
Plot No.
Human Disturbances 0-4 Rating, 0-No, 4-Very high
Wood Cutting
0-4
Lopping 0-4
Grass/ Bamboo
cutting 0-4
Presence of human/ livestock/trail 0-4
Weed Abundance
0-4
People Seen Y/N
Livestock Seen Y/N
Are there any permanent human settlements in the beat? (Yes/No).
If Yes, how many?_ Approximate human population_____,approximate livestock
population______
Cattle____ Goat/Sheep_____Other Livestock
Is there NTFP collection in the beat ________________ Yes/No.? If yes, what NTFP is collected? __
Rate NTFP collection on a scale of 0-4, 0-No to 4-Very high_______________________________
The proportion of the beat that was burnt during the past year was_____ secondyear was____third year was_____1 m radius circular plot
B. 1 m. radius circular plots:
This plot should be laid 5m away from the center of the 15m circular plat. The observer needs to use
a 2m long stick to define an imaginary circle around him with the stick as the diameter. Within this
circular plot (2m diameter) the observer needs to a) quantify the percent ground cover, i.e. the
proportion of the ground covered by herbs, grasses, litter, and bare ground, b) List the 3 most
dominant grass species, and herb species in order of dominance.
Recording Ground Cover in 1 m radius plot
Name of Observer: ………Date: …………Forest Circle: ………………Forest Division…………
Range: ……………………… Beat: …………ID No. of Line Transect: ………………………
Plot No.
Dry leaf
litter %
Ground Cover (The total percentage of following 5 columns should
be 100%)
Grass Species
(Report in descending
order of numbers)
Herb Species (Report in
descending order of
numbers)
Re
mar
ks
Dry Grass
%
Green Grass
%
Herb (Small
Plants) %
Weeds %
Bare Ground %
1 2 3 1 2 3
Wildlife Conservation Plan for Schedule I Faunal Species
of the Study area for the Development of Green Field Bhavanapadu Port in Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
63 | P a g e
5.4 BUDGETARY FOR CONSERVATION PLAN
The proponent as proposed a sum of Rs 70.5 Lakhs for the wildlife conservation plan under the
following heads in consultation of local forest department. Table 5.1 and Table 5.2 give the details
of budget.
Table 5.1: Budgetary allocation for conservation Plan
Year Activities Budget to be allocated (INR) in Lakhs
1st Year
Organizing Wild Life Awareness Programmes for conservation of wildlife and awareness of local people and students
0.25
Establishment of trained teams 0.5
Purchase of equipment’s such as Nets, tranquillizers equipment’s and Cages etc. for proper rescue and translocation of wild animals
0.5
Training the Emergency Response Team 1.25
Fund for necessary equipment’s for Emergency Response Team at District Forest Department level.
1.5
Survey, site identification, Construction of Water holes ( Small water ponds) & Rainwater harvesting pits in the study area and environs
1.5
Identification of natural habitats (forests, pastures, grasslands etc.) for Conservation measures
1
Promotion & Distribution of Alternative Energy Sources such as Solar Power, Biogas in the Project Affected Villages
0.5
Forest Fire Protection Measures 1
Installation of submersible water pumps for water supply 1
Telineelapuram bird Nest Area Artificial trees for nesting Nylon nets for protecting chicks
5
Plantation of suitable fruit & flower bearing plant species in the Study area so that the wild herbivores animals can reside within the forest.
1
SUBTOTAL 15
2nd Year
Organising Wild Life Awareness Programmes for conservation of wildlife and awareness of local people and students
0.25
Construction of Den for wildlife 0.75
Conservation programmes for natural habitats (forests, pastures/grasslands etc.) for Conservation measures
0.5
Construction of water Khelis/ Water holes, artificial ponds & rainwater harvesting pits etc.
0.5
Installation of submersible water pumps. 0.5
Promotion & Distribution of Alternative Energy Sources such as Solar Power, Biogas in the Project Affected Villages
1.25
Maintenance of tree groves, Dens bushy structure and roosting and nesting sites.
0.75
Wildlife Conservation Plan for Schedule I Faunal Species
of the Study area for the Development of Green Field Bhavanapadu Port in Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
64 | P a g e
Forest Fire Protection Measures 0.75
Procure car (4-wheeler) for monitoring and safeguard process of forest conservation
1.5
Plantation of suitable fruit & flower bearing plant species in the Study area so that the wild herbivores animals can reside within the forest.
0.75
Telineelapuram bird Nest Area Artificial trees for nesting near water bodies Nylon nets for protecting chicks
5.0
3rd Year
SUBTOTAL 12.5
Organising Wild Life Awareness Programmes for conservation of wildlife and awareness of local people and students
1
Completion of Construction of water Khelis/ Water holes, artificial ponds & Rainwater Harvesting Pits etc.
1
Completion of Construction of Den for Wildlife 0.5
Conservation programmes for natural habitats (forests, pastures/grasslands etc.) for Conservation measures
0.25
Maintenance & Repair of submersible water pumps. 0.25
Promotion & Distribution of Alternative Energy Sources such as Solar Power, Biogas in the Project Affected Villages
0.25
Maintenance of tree grooves, Dens bushy structure and roosting and nesting sites.
0.25
Forest Fire Protection Measures 0.5
Procure car (4-wheeler) for monitoring and safeguard process of forest conservation
1
Telineelapuram bird Nest Area Financial aid to forest department
2.5
SUBTOTAL 7.5
4th Year
Plantation of suitable fruit & flower bearing plant species in the Study area so that the wild herbivores animals can reside within the forest.
1.25
Conservation programmes for natural habitats (forests, pastures/grasslands etc.) for Conservation measures
1.25
Maintenance & Repair of submersible water pumps. 0.5
Maintenance of tree groves, Dens, bushy structure and roosting and nesting sites.
0.5
Promotion & Distribution of Alternative Energy Sources such as Solar Power, Biogas in the Project Affected Villages
0.5
Organizing wild life awareness programmes for conservation of wildlife and awareness of local people and students
0.5
Forest Fire Protection Measures 0.5
Telineelapuram bird Nest Area
Financial aid to forest department
2.5
SUBTOTAL 7.5
5th Year
Maintenance of planted species 1.25
Organizing wild life awareness programmes for conservation of wildlife and awareness of local people and students
1.25
Wildlife Conservation Plan for Schedule I Faunal Species
of the Study area for the Development of Green Field Bhavanapadu Port in Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
65 | P a g e
Plantation of suitable species in the buffer area so that the wild herbivores animals can reside within the forest.
0.5
Conservation programmes for natural habitats (forests, pastures/grasslands etc.) for Conservation measures
0.5
Promotion & Distribution of Alternative Energy Sources such as Solar Power, Biogas in the Project Affected Villages
0.5
Maintenance & Repair of submersible water pumps. 0.5
Maintenance of tree groves, Dens, bushy structure and roosting and nesting sites.
0.25
Forest Fire Protection Measures 0.25
Telineelapuram bird Nest Area
Financial aid to forest department
2.5
SUBTOTAL 7.5
6th Year
Periodic monitoring, Maintenance of water hole, dens, roosting sites, breeding ground of species.
0.5
Monitoring & Evaluation and Maintenance program for planted species.
0.5
Management for natural habitats (forests, pastures/grasslands etc.) for Conservation measures
0.5
Promotion & Distribution of Alternative Energy Sources such as Solar Power, Biogas in the Project Affected Villages
0.25
Maintenance of permanent and durable wildlife shed. 0.25
Forest Fire Protection Measures 0.25
Organising Wild Life Awareness Programmes for conservation of Wildlife and awareness of local people and students.
0.25
SUBTOTAL 2.5
7th Year
Periodic monitoring, Maintenance of water hole, dens, roosting sites, breeding ground of species.
0.5
Monitoring & Evaluation and Maintenance program for planted species.
0.5
Management for natural habitats (forests, pastures/grasslands etc.) for Conservation measures
0.5
Promotion & Distribution of Alternative Energy Sources such as Solar Power, Biogas in the Project Affected Villages
0.25
Maintenance of permanent and durable wildlife shed. 0.25
Forest Fire Protection Measures 0.25
Organising Wild Life Awareness Programmes for conservation of Wildlife and awareness of local people and students.
0.25
SUBTOTAL 2.5
8th Year
Maintenance of permanent and durable wildlife shed. 1.25
Organising Wild Life Awareness Programmes for conservation of Wildlife and awareness of local people and students.
0.25
Management for natural habitats (forests, pastures/grasslands etc.) for Conservation measures
0.25
Wildlife Conservation Plan for Schedule I Faunal Species
of the Study area for the Development of Green Field Bhavanapadu Port in Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
66 | P a g e
Promotion & Distribution of Alternative Energy Sources such as Solar Power, Biogas in the Project Affected Villages
0.25
Monitoring & Evaluation and Maintenance program for planted species.
0.25
Forest Fire Protection Measures 0.25
SUBTOTAL 2.5
9th Year
Maintenance of permanent and durable wildlife shed. 1
Organising Wild Life Awareness Programmes for conservation of Wildlife and awareness of local people and students.
0.5
Management for natural habitats (forests, pastures/grasslands etc.) for Conservation measures
0.25
Promotion & Distribution of Alternative Energy Sources such as Solar Power, Biogas in the Project Affected Villages
0.25
Monitoring & Evaluation and Maintenance program for planted species.
0.25
Forest Fire Protection Measures 0.25
SUBTOTAL 2.5
10th Year
Maintenance of permanent and durable wildlife shed. 1
Organising Wild Life Awareness Programmes for conservation of Wildlife and awareness of local people and students.
0.5
Management for natural habitats (forests, pastures/grasslands etc.) for Conservation measures
0.25
Promotion & Distribution of Alternative Energy Sources such as Solar Power, Biogas in the Project Affected Villages
0.25
Monitoring & Evaluation and Maintenance program for planted species.
0.25
Forest Fire Protection Measures 0.25
SUBTOTAL 2.5
Additional measures for Wildlife Conservation
Development of Wildlife conservation and protection centre with consultation to state Forest Department for research and further conservation
3
Development of Huts/Watch towers around the forest area for Forest conservation & Eco-tourism
5
GRAND TOTAL 70.5
Table 5.2: Year wise fund to be submitted by the user agency to State Forest Department, AP
Year 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Additional
Support Total
Provision in Lakhs
15 12.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 8 70.5
Provision in %
21% 18% 11% 11% 11% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 11% 100%
Wildlife Conservation Plan for Schedule I Faunal Species
of the Study area for the Development of Green Field Bhavanapadu Port in Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
67 | P a g e
6 CONCLUSION
Any developmental projects invariably involve the alteration of environmental conditions of a
particular geographical area. As a result, these projects impose some pressure on the social, physical
and biological components/structure of the project area that can affect the surrounding environment
adversely. The area with such developmental projects in place may have an important effect on the
subsequent environmental impacts. These impacts need to be assessed before the setting up of the
projects. Therefore, such developmental activities should be carried out in harmony with the carrying
capacity of nature and through judicious planning.
Large-scale development projects alter the natural surrounding and hence impact on ecosystem and
its components i.e. flora and fauna, is obvious. Before implementing such projects, it is vital to
understand the baseline status of floral and faunal diversity. The baseline data helps to design project
in such a way that any harmful impacts on the vegetation and fauna can be avoided. It also provides
an insight to mitigate plans to reorganize adverse impact on the natural surroundings.
The Baseline study for the existing ecological environment was carried out in a phased and
constructive manner. Collection and generation of ecological data has been completed at two levels:
Field Studies and Secondary data sources. Team of ecology experts visited the site during October to
December 2020 (Post-Monsoon Season).
During the survey, a total of three (03) Schedule I species including two (02) reptiles and one (01)
avifaunal species were reported in the Bhavanapdu port and its environs (10 km radius).
For the conservation of wildlife in the Giddaluru Forest Division; financial allocation of INR 50 Lakhs
has been made to fulfill the planned activities.
6.1 FURTHER SUGGESTIONS
Stopping the increased vehicle pollution, wildlife road fatalities and damage to precious
habitat by peoples to start movement towards these areas.
To carry annual census research projects to ecology and habitat use by peacock.
By making provision of veterinary care and cages for injured or sick deformed birds.
The prolific use of insecticides / pesticides should be checked as these harmful chemicals are
detrimental and instrumental for killing of insects / butterflies which are natural prey for the
birds.
Declare the animal as economically valuable
Enact stricter laws to control the capture or exploitation of females of any endangered
species and enforce them.
Indigenous knowledge of endangered animals should be enlisted in all tribal areas.
Forest Officials should have frequent coordination with the local inhabitants for checking any
poaching/illegal tree felling
Since the proposed NIMZ site falls under Giddaluru Forest Division; coordination within the
the Division is important to implement the conservation plan and there should be a
centralized system for information sharing within the division related to any wildlife
poaching, injury, causality, illegal trading and tree felling, etc.
Wildlife Conservation Plan for Schedule I Faunal Species
of the Study area for the Development of Green Field Bhavanapadu Port in Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
68 | P a g e
Captive breeding should be introduced on a commercial scale and value-added products
extracted with people’s participation. Profits should be equally shared. This may also
discourage the illegal trade.
Wildlife Conservation Plan for Schedule I Faunal Species
of the Study area for the Development of Green Field Bhavanapadu Port in Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
69 | P a g e
7 BIBLIOGRAPHY
Ahsen, M.F. and Saeed, M.A. 2004. Some aspects of breeding biology of the Bengal Lizard
(Varanus bengalensis) in Bangladesh. Asiatic Herpteological Research 10: 236-240.
Anderson, S.C. 1999. The Lizards of Iran. Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles,
Saint Louis, Missouri.
Arce, S.J.P., Estenssoro, C.S. and Ergueta, S.P. 1987. Diagnostico del estado de la flora, fauna
y communidades importantes para la conservacion. Centro de Datos para la Conservacion, La
Paz.
Auffenberg, W. 1989. Utilisation of Monitor Lizards in Pakistan. TRAFFIC Bulletin 11(1): 8-12.
Auffenberg, W. 1994. The Bengal Monitor. University of Florida Press, Gainesville, USA.
Beacham, W., Castronova, F.V., Freedman, B. and Sessine, S. (eds). 2001. Beacham's Guide
toInternational Endangered Species. Gale Research, Detroit.
Bohme, W. and Ziegler, T. 1997. On the synonymy and taxonomy of the Bengal monitor lizard,
Varanus bengalensis (Daudin, 1802) complex (Sauria: Varanidae). Amphibia-Reptilia 18: 207-
211.
Brazil, M. 2009. Birds of East Asia: eastern China, Taiwan, Korea, Japan, eastern Russia.
Christopher Helm, London. del Hoyo, J.; Elliott, A.; Sargatal, J. 1994. Handbook of the Birds of
the World, vol. 2: New World Vulturesto Guineafowl. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona, Spain.
Chebez, J.C. 1994. Los que se van. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Albatros. D’Arcy, W.G. 1987. Flora
of Panama: checklist and index. Monographs in Systematic Botany 17: 1-1000. Gentry, A.H.
1992. Bignoniaceae - Part II (Tribe Tecomeae).
Gaulke, M. and de Silva, A. 1977. Monitor lizards of Sri Lanka: Preliminary investigations on
their population structure. Lyriocephalus 3(1): 1-5.
Gupta, B.K. 1996. Trade of Bengal Monitor Varanus bengalensis in Uttar Pradesh, India.
Tigerpaper 23(1): 1-3.
Hudson, R., Alberts, A., Ellis, S. and Byers, O. 1994. Conservation Assessment and
Management Plan for Iguanidae and Varanidae. IUCN/SSC Conservation Breeding Specialist
Group, Apple Valley, Minnesota.
IUCN. 2010. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species (ver. 2010.4). Available at:
http://www.iucnredlist.org. (Accessed: 27 October 2010).
IUCN. 2016. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2016-3. Available at:
www.iucnredlist.org. (Accessed: 07 December 2016).
King, D. and Green B. 1999. Monitors: The Biology of Varanus Lizards. Krieger Publishing
Company, Florida.
Nawaz, M. and Nawaz, Y. 2003. Monitor lizard (Varanidae: Reptilia) in Baluchistan, Pakistan.
Tigerpaper 30(3): 28-30.
Oldfield, S., Lusty, C. and MacKinven, A. (compilers). 1998. The World List of Threatened Trees.
World Conservation Press, Cambridge, UK.
Pianka, E.R. 2004. Varanus bengalensis. In: Pianka, E.R. and King, D.R. (eds), Varanoid lizards
of the world, pp. 157-160. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, USA.
Wildlife Conservation Plan for Schedule I Faunal Species
of the Study area for the Development of Green Field Bhavanapadu Port in Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
70 | P a g e
Prado, D.E. 1995. Selva pedemontana: contexto regional y lista floristica de un ecosistema en
peligro. In: A.D. Brown and H.R. Grau (eds) Investigacion, Conservacion y Desarollo en Selvas
Subtropicales deMontana, pp.19-52.
Sindaco, R. and Jeremčenko, V.K. 2008. The Reptiles of the Western Palearctic. 1. Annotated
Checklist and Distributional atlas of the turtles, crocodiles, amphisbaenians and lizards of
Europe, North Africa, Middle East and Central Asia. Edizioni Belvedere, Latina (Italy).
Wildlife Conservation Plan for Schedule I Faunal Species
of the Study area for the Development of Green Field Bhavanapadu Port in Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh
71 | P a g e
8 CITATION
BirdLife International. 2016. Pavo cristatus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2016:
e.T22679435A92814454.http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.20163.RLTS.T22679435A92814
454.en
Papenfuss, T., Shafiei Bafti, S., Sharifi, M., Bennett, D. & Sweet, S.S. 2010. Varanus
bengalensis. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2010: e.T164579A5909661.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2010- 4.RLTS.T164579A5909661.en
Prado, D. 1998. Jacaranda mimosifolia. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species
1998:e.T32027A9675619.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.1998.RLTS.T32027A9675619.en
Certificate of Accreditation
Voyants Solutions Pvt. Ltd
403, 4th Floor, Park Centra, Sec-30, NH-8, Gurugram -122001
The organization is accredited as Category-A under the QCI-NABET Scheme for Accreditation of EIA Consultant Organization, Version 3: for preparing EIA-EMP reports in the following Sectors –
Note: Names of approved EIA Coordinators and Functional Area Experts are mentioned in RAAC minutes dated Nov 26, 2021
posted on QCI-NABET website.
The Accreditation shall remain in force subject to continued compliance to the terms and conditions mentioned in QCI-NABET’s letter of accreditation bearing no. QCI/NABET/ENV/ACO/21/2195 dated Dec 30, 2021. The accreditation needs to be renewed before the expiry date by Voyants Solutions Pvt. Ltd, Gurugram following due process of assessment.
Sr. Director, NABET Certificate No. Valid up to Dated: Dec 30, 2021 NABET/EIA/2124/RA 0223 Sept 14, 2024
For the updated List of Accredited EIA Consultant Organizations with approved Sectors please refer to QCI-NABET website.
S. No
Sector Description Sector (as per)
Cat. NABET MoEFCC
1 Mining of minerals including opencast / underground mining 1 1 (a) (i) A
2 River Valley projects 3 1 (c) A
3 Thermal power plants 4 1 (d) B
4 Mineral beneficiation 7 2 (b) B
5 Isolated storage & handling of Hazardous chemicals (As per threshold planning quantity indicated in column 3 of schedule 2 & 3 of MSIHC Rules 1989 amended 2000)
28 - B
6 Industrial estates/ parks/ complexes/areas, export processing Zones (EPZs), Special Economic Zones(SEZs), Biotech Parks, Leather Complexes
31 7 (c) A
7 Ports, harbours, break waters and dredging 33 7 (e) A
8 Highways 34 7 (f) A
9 Common Effluent Treatment Plants (CETPs) 36 7 (h) B
10 Common Municipal Solid Waste Management Facility (CMSWMF) 37 7 (i) B
11 Building and construction projects 38 8 (a) B
12 Townships and Area development projects 39 8(b) B
National Accreditation Board for Education and Training
VOYANTS SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD. 403, 4thFloor, BPTP Park Centra,
Sector -30, NH-8, Gurugram-122001 Phone: 0124-4598 200, Telefax: 0124-4019051
E-mail: [email protected], www.voyants.in