Date post: | 17-Nov-2023 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | independent |
View: | 0 times |
Download: | 0 times |
IRJMSH Vol 6 Issue 5 [Year 2015] ISSN 2277 – 9809 (0nline) 2348–9359 (Print)
International Research Journal of Management Sociology & Humanity ( IRJMSH ) Page 55
www.irjmsh.com
Aridity in Telangana Region: An Analysis of Drought
Satyendra Singh Narwaria
Ritesh Ranjan Pushkar1
Introduction
Drought can be termed as a temporary reduction in water or moisture availability
significantly below the normal amount for a specific period. However, it can be said that
drought is a term which is very difficult to be defined precisely. It embraces a phenomenon
which is very diverse and complex.
There has been no universally acceptable definition of drought. However most of the
definitions of drought may be categorized in:
Meteorological definitions: These are the most common definitions of drought,
which usually compare precipitation levels to a long term average. Meteorological
drought refers to a specific degree of dryness for a given duration.
Hydrological drought: These definitions focus on the surface and sub-surface water.
Usually these studies aim at unraveling the relationship between meteorological
drought and water supply.
Agricultural drought: These definitions include the emphasis on deficits in meeting
the crop water needs. These definitions are relatively more important in rained
agricultural systems.
Socio-economic drought: It includes those definitions of drought, which highlight
the effects of water shortage on human society and economy. These definitions are
very rarely used.
All these four categories of drought definitions point towards the same phenomenon i.e.
shortage in precipitation which leads to water shortage.
It is quite interesting to note that any area at any point of time may or may not experience the
drought of more than one type. E.g. an area may not be having hydrological drought in spite
of having meteorological drought. This is because of the higher than the normal precipitation
may have occurred in previous terms.
Similarly, a region may not have agricultural drought in spite of having meteorological
1 Satyendra and Ritesh are the Ph.D scholars in Centre for the South Asian Studies in School of International Studies
and in Centre for the Studies of Regional Development in School of Social Sciences respectively of Jawaharlal
Nehru University, New Delhi-110067
IRJMSH Vol 6 Issue 5 [Year 2015] ISSN 2277 – 9809 (0nline) 2348–9359 (Print)
International Research Journal of Management Sociology & Humanity ( IRJMSH ) Page 56
www.irjmsh.com
drought. This may be because of the well-developed agricultural systems.
Operational definition of drought: Drought is a region occurs when there is less than 20%
Of the total rainfall received in a particular period.
Criteria will be: (as per IMD)
Variability in rainfall (%) Condition
< -50.00 % Severe drought
-25.00 - 50.00 % Deficit rainfall
- 19.00 - 19.00 % Normal Departure
19.00 – 50.00 % Excess rainfall
>50.00 Extreme / Flood condition
About Telangana: Telangana region is the interior part of the state of Andhra Pradesh. Of the three regions of
the state, Telangana has the largest area, with 1,14,800 km².The Telangana plateau is
composed of Archean Gneissic rocks and drained by Godavari and Krishna rivers. The entire
region is divided into two main regions namely Ghats and pen plains. The surface is dotted
with low depressions.
The region lies on the Deccan plateau to the west of the Eastern Ghats range, and includes the
northwestern interior districts of Warangal, Adilabad, Khammam, Mahabubnagar, Nalgonda,
Rangareddy, Karimnagar, Nizamabad, Medak, and the state capital, Hyderabad. The Krishna
and Godavari rivers flow through the region from west to east.
Statement of the problem: Drought is one of those concepts which have the highest
relevance in today’s age of global warming. For the present study, meteorological drought of
the Telangana region will be studied.
Objectives: Following objectives have been formulated:
I. To study the annual rainfall variability of various meteorological stations in
Telangana region.
II. To study the monthly rainfall variability of various meteorological station in
IRJMSH Vol 6 Issue 5 [Year 2015] ISSN 2277 – 9809 (0nline) 2348–9359 (Print)
International Research Journal of Management Sociology & Humanity ( IRJMSH ) Page 57
www.irjmsh.com
Telangana region.
III. To study the trend of occurrence of drought in various meteorological stations.
IV. To study the annual probability of the occurrence of Drought in various
meteorological stations.
V. To study the monthly probability of the occurrence of Drought in various
meteorological stations.
Database:
Daily weather reports of the Indian Meteorological Department (IMD) Year: 1982-2007
Methodology:
Following steps have been taken in the analysis of data:
Col lec t ion of data: the data of ACTUAL RAINFAL & NORMAL RAINFALL has been
taken.
Calcula t ion of the deviation:
(i) Deviation = Actual data – normal data
(ii) % deviation =( deviation/normal data)* 100Then the data has been categorized into
various meteorological conditions like drought, normal and excess rainfall.
P robabi l i ty of occurrence of drought conditions has been calculated by dividing
t h e no of drought years, months by number of normal rainfall of that particular
month, day.
Literature review:
Gregory, S (1985) attempted to study the change in frequency of drought of India for a
period of 115 years (1871-1985). He emphasized the vital role of summer monsoon rainfall
(mainly in the four months June to September inclusive). While doing literature review he
found that throughout all the literature, the occurrence of individual drought years, or
successive years of low rainfall, has always been noted and commented upon.
He faced the difficulties in : (i) the changing definition of drought or significant rainfall
deficit, (ii) changes in the space units considered, from individual stations to subdivisions,
macro-regions or All-India.
He used the database provided by various scholars who studied thae rainfall in India
previously.
IRJMSH Vol 6 Issue 5 [Year 2015] ISSN 2277 – 9809 (0nline) 2348–9359 (Print)
International Research Journal of Management Sociology & Humanity ( IRJMSH ) Page 58
www.irjmsh.com
The purpose of his paper was to examine the extent to which drought frequency has changed
over and within the period 1871-1985, and the differences in such changes from one part of
India to another.
He divided India into 10 major regions with 29 meteorological substations and 306 District
stations. His regions were: Region 1: Assam Region 2: Northern West Bengal and Bihar
Region 3: Southern West Bengal and Bihar Region 4: North-East Peninsula Region 5: Uttar
Pradesh Region 6: The North-West Region 7: Gujarat, Saurashtra and Kutch Region 8:
North-West and North-Centre Peninsula Region 9: South-East Peninsula Region 10: South-
West Peninsula
In each case, droughts were seen as occurring in a region under the following circumstances:
(i) the driest ten per cent of years, i.e. the driest 11 years in any region; (ii) years in which the
Summer monsoon rainfall deficit was more than 20 per cent i.e. rainfall was less than 80 per
cent of the 1871-1985 average. (iii) Years in which much bigger deficits occurred, this
applying to only some of the regions.
And finally he presented the findings based on the above mentioned criterions.
Skaggs, Richard H. (1975) studied the Drought in the United States, 1931-40. He used the
palmer index of meteorological drought as the measure of dryness (and wetness). The palmer
index is a normalized measure of intensity of dryness or wetness over an area.
The values may be compared directly between locations and through time. The palmer index
ranges from greater than 4.00 for extremely wet condition to less than -4.00 for extreme
drought. A value of zero indicates normal moisture conditions. He calculated the palmer Index
for monthly periods of climatologically divisions. He calculated the index on a regular basis for
all climatological divisions of the United States since January 1931. Then he analyses the data
using various complex mathematical series.
He found that 1931-40 period was dry on a national scale. The northern Rocky Mountains, the
northern plains, and the central plains were the major drought area and experienced the most
intense and longest drought. The most intense drought was found to be occurred in 1933-34,
1936 and 1939-40.
Radcliffe, Miles, Rydz and Shaw (1978) studied the meteorological Aspects of the 1975-76
droughts in Western Europe. other than the meteorology, they included a few facts about
evaporation during the period, drawn attention to some associations and possible feedback
mechanisms involving the atmosphere, oceans and ice cover which might have contributed to
its onset and maintenance and also made an attempt to put the drought in a historical
perspective.
Their methodology was linked to getting the facts from the reviews of the related literatures
and other meteorological data available from laboratories e.g. Synoptic Climatology Branch.
Then they have given a clarification about the causes of this drought. They provided the
description of drought. They defined drought as occurring over the 16 month period May 1975
IRJMSH Vol 6 Issue 5 [Year 2015] ISSN 2277 – 9809 (0nline) 2348–9359 (Print)
International Research Journal of Management Sociology & Humanity ( IRJMSH ) Page 59
www.irjmsh.com
to August 1976 inclusive.
Over England and Wales as a whole the 16 month period had about 10 % less rain than was
recorded over any other 16 month period since 1820 and that was without doubt the driest
such period since records began in 1727. The severest drought was in central southern
England and northern France but much of Europe was affected to some extent. They focused
their study to the rainfall events of England and Wales as a whole.
They added meteorological description to the drought. Firstly, in addition to their dryness,
the winters 1971-4 were all mild, not only in Britain but over most of Europe as far east as
Moscow and also in the Russian Arctic. As a result, the coldest air in the Northern
Hemisphere was displaced west- wards to Canada and the North Pacific, where winters were
all notably colder than the 1951-70 averages.
The second interesting fact was that the jet stream in the east Atlantic/European sector was
displaced between 5 and 10 degrees of latitude northwards over the 16 month drought period
compared with the same 1951-70 averaging period. This northward movement occurred in
the late autumn of 1974 and, on a monthly basis, was persistent, with only short period
variations until September 1976, suggesting a good deal of inertia in the atmosphere over this
16 month period.
Thirdly, they not iced t h a t the Pacific Ocean north of 40o
N was continuously colder than
usual, especially from spring 1975 to summer 1976 inclusive. It is probable that the coldness
of the ocean was partly due to the coldness of the winters of the early 1970s in that sector of
the hemisphere: in particular, ice was excessive in the North Pacific in late winter 1975 and
1976, and its melting may well have been partly responsible for the sharp increase of negative
sea tempera- true anomalies in the springs and summers of those years.
They concluded that: (i) The drought was the result of complicated interaction between a
number of large-scale meteorological and oceanographic factors. (ii) Feedback mechanisms
involving ocean temperatures in the Atlantic and Pacific and also the dryness of the ground
itself probably helped to maintain the atmospheric mode longer than it otherwise would have
done. (iii) There appears no evidence to suggest a climatic change or trend; rather the drought
stands out as an isolated but very unusual event. (iv) The enhanced Pacific flow and the
winter coldness over Canada appear to have been important factors in the drought.
INTERPRETATTIONS:
1.1 frequency of drought (annual)
From sheet-1, we can say that almost all the districts are having more or less
prevalence of rainfall deficiency. As we can say that every district is experiencing drought
condition. However Khammam, Ramagundam and Mehboob nagar are having frequent
occurrence of drought condition. Here Mehboob nagar is the worstly affected
meteorological station in the region, where drought condition has prevailed in more than
50% of the years under study. However Hyderabad and Nizamabad are least affected
meteorological stations with 2 and 4 times of occurrence of drought in past 26 years
respectively.
IRJMSH Vol 6 Issue 5 [Year 2015] ISSN 2277 – 9809 (0nline) 2348–9359 (Print)
International Research Journal of Management Sociology & Humanity ( IRJMSH ) Page 60
www.irjmsh.com
The number of drought years in past 26 years may be summarized as :
TABLE - I
Meteorological station No. Of drought years
Hanamkomda 6
Hyderabad 2
Khammam 7
Mehboonagar 14
Nizamabad 4
Ramagundam 7
Now the monthly rainfall variability of the various stations in the telangana region may
be studied with the help of sheet-2
1.2 frequency of drought (monthly)
Hanamkonda : Hanamkonda is a moderate drought prone region which has 6
times occurrence of drought in past 26 years. The monthly analysis of the data
reveals theVulnerability of the Hanamkonda district towards drought. Here every month in
one or other year is experiencing the drought condition. However the months having
less amount of normal monthly rainfall (winter months) are worstly affected. This is
because that even a minor change in the received rainfall may cause very high percent of the
rainfall variability in the meteorological station. February and august are the least drought
prone months. The monthly table of the rainfall variability of Hanamkonda is:
TABLE-II (HANAMKONDA)
MONTH OCCURENCE OF DROUGHT IN
PAST
26 YEARS ( 1982-2007) JAN 18
FEB 5
MAR 18
APR 19
MAY 16
JUN 19
JUL 11
AUG 9
SEP 13
OCT 12
NOV 15
DEC 20
IRJMSH Vol 6 Issue 5 [Year 2015] ISSN 2277 – 9809 (0nline) 2348–9359 (Print)
International Research Journal of Management Sociology & Humanity ( IRJMSH ) Page 61
www.irjmsh.com
Hyderabad: Hyderabad is one of the least drought prone districts of the telangana region. So
monthly analysis of the data is required, so as to know the months which are vulnerable to
the drought condition. Hyderabad is also the more droughts prone in case of low rainfall
month’s .i.e. winter season.
Khammam: this is the most vulnerable meteorological station to the drought conditions. If
we see the monthly occurrence of the rainfall in this region then it can be interpreted that this
station has recorded the highest variability in rainfall received. It has drought condition in
case of December month in 22 out of 26 years under study. Number of drought years is also
very high in case of the rainy season months.
(HYDERABAD)
MONTH OCCURENCE OF DROUGHT IN PAST 26
YEARS ( 1982-2007)
JAN 16
FEB 19
MAR 15
APR 13
MAY 18
JUN 8
JUL 10
AUG 5
SEP 17
OCT 10
NOV 13
DEC 18
TABLE-IV
(KHAMMAM) MONTH OCCURENCE OF DROUGHT IN PAST 26
YEARS ( 1982-2007)
JAN 15
FEB 7
MAR 21
APR 19
MAY 18
JUN 18
JUL 12
AUG 4
SEP 16
OCT 18
NOV 19
DEC 22
IRJMSH Vol 6 Issue 5 [Year 2015] ISSN 2277 – 9809 (0nline) 2348–9359 (Print)
International Research Journal of Management Sociology & Humanity ( IRJMSH ) Page 62
www.irjmsh.com
Mehboob nagar: comparatively this station also records high chances of drought months in
case of winter months like November, December, January, and February. It has recorded
highest occurrence of drought in May, where it has drought in 23 out of 26 years under
study.
Table V
(MEHBOOBNAGAR)
MONTH OCCURENCE OF DROUGHT IN PAST 26
YEARS ( 1982-2007)
JAN 21
FEB 17
MAR 13
APR 17
MAY 23
JUN 11
JUL 8
AUG 16
SEP 15
OCT 14
NOV 18
DEC 19
Nizamabad : This station behaves like Hyderabad in one or other way. This station also
records relatively lesser number of drought years as comparable to other stations. However
there is a strange finding that this region has recorded about 25 times drought situation out
of 26 years under study in May month.
TABLE-VI (NIZAMABAD)
MONTH OCCURENCE OF DROUGHT IN PAST 26
YEARS ( 1982-2007)
JAN 18
FEB 15
MAR 17
APR 12
MAY 14
JUN 25
JUL 10
AUG 11
SEP 13
OCT 10
NOV 17
DEC 14
IRJMSH Vol 6 Issue 5 [Year 2015] ISSN 2277 – 9809 (0nline) 2348–9359 (Print)
International Research Journal of Management Sociology & Humanity ( IRJMSH ) Page 63
www.irjmsh.com
Ramagundam: This station has received the least number of drought months in the
month of May, where it has recorded only 2 months under drought situation in past 26
years. However similar to Nizamabad station this station has also received highest
frequency of drought occurrence in the month of May , where it has recorded 24 years of
drought out of 26 years under study. TABLE-VII
(RAMAGUNDAM)
MONTH OCCURENCE OF DROUGHT IN PAST
26
YEARS ( 1982-2007) JAN 17
FEB 16
MAR 16
APR 9
MAY 2
JUN 24
JUL 12
AUG 9
SEP 17
OCT 14
NOV 15
DEC 20
1.3 Probability of drought (annual) : probability of drought is a very difficult to be
calculated criteria. However for the present study it has been calculated the actual
occurrence of drought divided by total number of years under study.
TABLE – VIII PROBAILITY OF DROUGHT ( ANNUAL)
Meteorological station No. Of drought years Probability of drought
Hanamkomda 6 .23
Hyderabad 2 .08
Khammam 7 .27
Mehboonagar 14 .54
Nizamabad 4 .15
Ramagundam 7 .27
This table reveals that Mehboob nagar is the highest drought prone station of the region
with a probability of 0.54 for occurrence of drought. It is followed by the meteorological
stations of Khammam, Ramagundam and Hanamkonda with probabilities of 0.27, 0.27 and
0.23 Respectively. Hyderabad and Nizamabad are the meteorological stations with least
chances of occurrence of drought i.e. 0.08 and 0.15 probability respectively.
IRJMSH Vol 6 Issue 5 [Year 2015] ISSN 2277 – 9809 (0nline) 2348–9359 (Print)
International Research Journal of Management Sociology & Humanity ( IRJMSH ) Page 64
www.irjmsh.com
1.4 Probability of drought (monthly): probability of occurrence of drought in various
months has been tabulated in table-IX.
TABLE – IX
PROBAILITY OF DROUGHT ( MONTHLY)
Hanamkonda
Hyderabad
Khammam
Mehboob
nagar
Nizamabad
Ramagundam
JAN 0.69 0.62 0.58 0.81 0.69 0.65
FEB 0.19 0.73 0.27 0.65 0.58 0.62
MAR 0.69 0.58 0.81 0.50 0.65 0.62
APR 0.73 0.50 0.73 0.65 0.46 0.35
MAY 0.62 0.69 0.69 0.88 0.54 0.08
JUN 0.73 0.31 0.69 0.42 0.96 0.92
JUL 0.42 0.38 0.46 0.31 0.38 0.46
AUG 0.35 0.19 0.15 0.62 0.42 0.35
SEP 0.50 0.65 0.62 0.58 0.50 0.65
OCT 0.46 0.38 0.69 0.54 0.38 0.54
NOV 0.58 0.50 0.73 0.69 0.65 0.58
DEC 0.77 0.69 0.85 0.73 0.54 0.77
This table-IX tells us about the probability of occurrence of drought in various months
at various meteorological stations. Here the highest probability of occurrence is there in
the month of June for the Nizamabad and Ramagundam. This very high occurrence of
drought in this month may be attributed to late onset of the SW monsoon.
Month of august is least affected month as far as the occurrence of drought is concerned.
Hyderabad and Khammam have probabilities of 0.19 and 0.15 of occurrence of drought in
the month of August respectively.
Findings:
Khammam, Ramagundam and Mehboob nagar are having frequent occurrence
of drought condition. Here Mehboob nagar is the worstly affected
IRJMSH Vol 6 Issue 5 [Year 2015] ISSN 2277 – 9809 (0nline) 2348–9359 (Print)
International Research Journal of Management Sociology & Humanity ( IRJMSH ) Page 65
www.irjmsh.com
meteorological station in the region, where drought condition has prevailed
in more than 50% of the years under study. However Hyderabad and
Nizamabad are least affected meteorological stations in past 26 years with 2
and 4 times of occurrence of drought respectively.
However the months having less amount of normal monthly rainfall ( winter
months) are worstly affected. This is because that even a minor change in the
received rainfall may cause very high percent of the rainfall variability in the
meteorological station.
Month of August is least affected month as far as the occurrence of drought is
concerned.
Some meteorological stations in like Nizamabad and Ramagundam have very
high occurrence of drought in June month. It may be attributed to late onset
of the SW monsoon.
References:
M o r a l e s , Chorister (1977). Rainfall Variability: A Natural Phenomenon. Ambio,
Vol. 6, No.1, Water: A Special Issue (1977), pp. 30-33
G r e g o r y , S. (1989). The Changing Frequency of Drought in India, 1871-
1985 .The Geographical Journal, Vol. 155, No. 3 (Nov., 1989), pp. 322-33
B a g l a , Pallava. (2002). Drought Exposes Cracks in India's Monsoon Model.
Science, New Series, Vol. 297, No. 5585 (Aug. 23, 2002), pp. 1265-1267
R a n g a s w a m i , Amrita (1974). The Uses of ‘Drought’. Economic and Political
Weekly, Vol. 9, No. 50 (Dec. 14, 1974), pp. 2069+2071-2074
R at c l i f f e , Miles, Rydz and Shaw. (1978). Meteorological Aspects of the 1975-76
Drought [and Discussion] . Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A,
Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Vol. 363, No. 1712 (Nov. 1, 1978), pp. 3-20
H u l m e , Mike (1990). The Changing Rainfall Resources of Sudan .Transactions of
theInstitute of British Geographers. New Series, Vol. 15, No. 1 (1990), pp. 21-34
Walsh, Hulme and Campbell. (1998). Recent Rainfall Changes and Their Impact on
Hydrology and Water Supply in the Semi- Arid Zone of the Sudan. The Geographical
Journal, Vol. 154, No. 2 (Jul., 1988), pp. 181-197
S k a g g s , Richard H. (1975). Drought in the United States , 1931-40. Annals
of the Association of American Geographers, Vol. 65, No. 3 (Sep., 1975), pp. 391-402