Date post: | 17-Jan-2023 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | khangminh22 |
View: | 0 times |
Download: | 0 times |
ASSET-LIABILITY MANAGEMENT AT
ANDHRA PRADESH STATE FINANCIAL CORPORATION,
HYDERABAD
Dr. P. Hima Jagathi, Professor, Department of MBA, Aurora’s PG College, Hyderabad.
Email: [email protected]
ABSTRACT
ALM is a portfolio management of Assets and liabilities of an organization. It is a method of
matching various Assets with liabilities based on expected maturity pattern. Generally, Banks
adopt Gap Analysis, trend Analysis and Ratio Analysis to solve the problems of Assets-Liability
Management. By determining Gap Analysis Financial Institutions can avoid risk and earn profits,
it is beneficial from rising Interest rates by having positive Gap. This study examines the concept
of Asset Liability Management, ALM process, compare and analyze the maturity gap for
measuring the liquidity risks and to study the trend analysis of 5 years (i.e. from 2014-2015 to
2018-2019) by utilizing structural liquidity statements for determining liquidity requirements and
position for maintaining optimal liquidity management at APSFC. In addition to Liquidity Gap
Analysis, financial efficiency and profitability position of APSFC is studied through selected
Ratios by comparing two years.
Keywords: Asset Liability Management, Liquidity Gap, financial efficiency, ratios.
INTRODUCTION
Asset-Liability Management refers to the process by which an institution manages its balance
sheet which provides institutions with protection that makes such risk acceptable. Its Models
enables institutions to measure and monitors risk and provide suitable strategies for their
management. It includes not only understanding but also a way to quantify and manage risks.
Further, even in the absence of a formal Asset Liability Management program, the understanding
of these concepts is of values to an institution as it provides a true picture of the risk/reward
trade-off in which institution is engaged.
Journal of Xi'an University of Architecture & Technology
Volume XI, Issue XII, 2019
Issn No : 1006-7930
Page No: 1313
Banks and financial institutions provide services, which involves various kinds of risk liquidity
risk, interest risk & credit risk. Failure to identify this risk leads to effect the financial position of
those institutions. Therefore, one of the strategies to access such kind of risk is ALM. It is used
to analyse the difference between assets and liabilities with respect to maturities and interest rate
sensitivity, so that the banks can minimize the risk arising from such gap mainly from interest
risk and liquidity risk. ALM involves identification of risk parameters, Risk identification, Risk
measurement and Risk management and framing of Risk policies and tolerance levels. Asset-
Liability Management is a first step in the long-term strategic planning process. Therefore, it can
be considered as a planning function for an intermediate term. The present study is undertaken to
make an analysis of Structural liquidity statements provided by the Company to find out the gap
between total assets and total liabilities which can either be negative gap or positive gap, by
measuring the gap liquidity needs and position of the firm can be determined. Thus, effective
liquidity management reduces the chances of critical risk situations and maintains optimum
liquidity position.
In addition to Liquidity Gap Analysis, financial efficiency and profitability position of Andhra
Pradesh State Financial Corporation (APSFC) is studied through selected Ratios.
NEED FOR THE STUDY
With growing competition worldwide, mismatch of assets and liabilities produced effect on the
calculation of profitability of financial institutions coupled with highly volatile interest rates and
liquidity crisis, the financial institutions face the problem of real valuation of their assets and
liabilities, these institutions have to adopt methods in order to cover the problems of liquidity
mismatch and interest rate risk and to restructure their balance sheet with the help of Asset-
Liability Management Thus, the study on Asset-Liability Management of APSFC has
tremendous importance in the present context.
SCOPE OF THE STUDY
The Scope of the study is confined to the detailed study, about the organization and identifies the
company’s position regarding Asset-Liability Management in the industry and to suggest means
of improvement in the existing system. It is limited to Andhra Pradesh State Financial
Corporation (APSFC), Hyderabad only and the data taken for the study is limited to 5 years (i.e.
Journal of Xi'an University of Architecture & Technology
Volume XI, Issue XII, 2019
Issn No : 1006-7930
Page No: 1314
from 2014-2015 to 2018-2019) structural liquidity Statements has been taken for analysis of the
study.
OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY
To study the concept of Asset Liability Management with reference to Andhra Pradesh
State Financial Corporation (APSFC)
To study ALM process practiced by Andhra Pradesh State Financial Corporation
(APSFC)
To compare and analyze the maturity gap of Andhra Pradesh State Financial Corporation
(APSFC) for measuring the liquidity risks and to find out the causes of mismatches of
assets and liabilities if any
To study the trend analysis of 5 years (i.e. from 2014-2015 to 2018-2019) by utilizing
structural liquidity statements for determining liquidity requirements and position for
maintaining optimal liquidity management.
To study the financial efficiency and profitability position of Andhra Pradesh State
Financial Corporation (APSFC) through selected Ratios.
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
Research methodology used for the study includes primary and secondary sources of data.
Research has done by using the information collected from Purchase department and Finance &
Accounts department. The sources of primary data are interaction with the resource person of
Andhra Pradesh State Financial Corporation (APSFC). Secondary data is the data that is
available prior to the commencement of the research study. It may either be published data or
unpublished data. The sources of secondary data were Annual reports from 2014-2015 to 2018-
2019 of APSFC, RBI guidelines on ALM, Various websites pertaining to ALM,
Articles/Journals & Newspapers.
TOOLS USED FOR DATA ANALYSIS
1) Liquidity Gap Analysis:
Structural Liquidity for the financial years from 2014-2015 to 2018-2019 i.e. (<=1year)
Structural Liquidity for the financial years from 2014-2015 to 2018-2019 i.e. (>1 year & upto 3
years)
Journal of Xi'an University of Architecture & Technology
Volume XI, Issue XII, 2019
Issn No : 1006-7930
Page No: 1315
Structural Liquidity for the financial years from 2014-2015 to 2018-2019 i.e. (>3 years & upto 5
years)
Structural Liquidity for the financial years from 2014-2015 to 2018-2019 i.e. (>5 years & upto 7
years)
Structural Liquidity for the financial years from 2014-2015 to 2018-2019 i.e. (>7 years &
upto 10 years)
Structural Liquidity for the financial years from 2014-2015 to 2018-2019 i.e. (>10years)
2) Financial Tools:
Net Worth
Capital Adequacy Ratio
Operating Profit Ratio
Return on Total Assets
REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE
Elijah Adeyinka Adedeji (2014) , Ratio Analysis has served as a veritable means of monitoring,
measuring and improving performance in an organization. Hence the study examines a tool for
measuring organization performance using ratio analysis. It also ascertains the relevance of
internal and external financial reports during ratio analysis for the purpose of establishing key
relationships & results in order to appraise financial performance. The study confirmed that there
is significant relationship between ratio analyses and organizational performance as well as
financial ratios highlight the importance of effective management of an organization. Based on
the findings, it is recommended that financial ratios should be computed periodically to reveal
areas of strengths & weaknesses as well as ratio analysis should be used to measure performance
in terms of profitability.
Dr.R Umarani and M Jayanthi (2015), Asset Liability Management is a dynamic process of
planning, organizing, coordinating and controlling the assets and liabilities, their mixes, volumes,
maturities, yields and costs in order to achieve a specified NII.As all transactions of the banks
revolve around raising and deploying the funds, ALM gains more significance as an initiative
towards the risk management practices by the banks. Measuring and managing the liquidity risk
is an important dimension of ALM. Mismatch in the maturity profile of assets and liabilities
Journal of Xi'an University of Architecture & Technology
Volume XI, Issue XII, 2019
Issn No : 1006-7930
Page No: 1316
exposes the balance sheet to liquidity risk. This paper is aimed at measuring the liquidity risk in
SBI & associate banks in India, by using Gap Analysis Technique (Maturity profiling), using
publicly available information, paper attempts to assess the liquidity risk carried by the sample
banks in the year 2011-2012. The findings revealed that the banks are exposed to liquidity risk.
Eugenia Ana Matis and Crenguta Alina Matis (2015), Liquidity risk management often called
“Water of Life” in the banking system needs to be addressed by banks with more rigors, given
the current financial environment. This implies a better diversification of the funding sources,
longer average debt maturities in order to reduce some gaps between assets and liabilities,
creating liquidity reserves based on immediately attainable assets. This paper focuses on stress-
testing scenarios, performing an empirical study on tracking and limiting liquidity risk in
Romania compared to the European banking system, starting from the premise that one of the
most important elements of the financial crisis is the liquidity crisis in the credit institutions. The
paper presents a selection and analysis of ,measures to improve the crisis and not least, the
implementation of liquidity scenarios, applicable to the various stages of the crisis.
Mr. Chetan Shetty and Ms. Pooja Patel (2016) , Asset liability Management is a systematic
and dynamic process of planning, organizing, coordinating and controlling the assets & liabilities
or in the sense management of balance sheet structure in such a way the net earnings from
interest are maximized within the overall risk preference of banks. This study examined the
effect of ALM on 5 private sector banks profitability in Indian financial marketsby using Gap
Analysis and Ratio Analysis. The finding from this study revealed that banks have been exposed
to liquidity risk.
Satvir Kaur (2016), This paper gives the idea that Ratio Analysis is one of the powerful tools of
the financial Analysis. It provides meaningful understanding and interpretation which absolute
Accounting data cannot provide.
Md. Khalifa Blaao (2016), Commercial Banks is one of the active institutions in the economy
and has significant role in increasing the economic activity of any state. Hence focus must be on
process of analysis in order to determine financial position. In this study financial evaluation of
commercial banks for years 2013-2015 in order to see if the profitability ratios of evaluating the
performance of banks & stand on the financial position of the banks. It highlights the importance
of profitability ratios as the performance of financial analysis and the role played in the detection
Journal of Xi'an University of Architecture & Technology
Volume XI, Issue XII, 2019
Issn No : 1006-7930
Page No: 1317
of deviations and stand on the real situations of commercial banks & detection of strengths and
weaknesses centres.
S.P. Joshi & Dr. R. V. Sontakay (2017), Asset Liability Management (ALM) plays key role in
banking and finance industries. Any bank of financial industry will collapse without the use of
ALM tactics. Therefore to survive in the market, the ALM analysis is carried out timely by these
industries to measure the value of risk factors involved.ALM analysis not only minimizes the
risk but also it helps to achieve the financial goals of the industry. In this paper, various ALM
techniques are reported aiming to financial stability. The survey helps for emerging banks to
decide the different ALM process used by the banking industries and to select the efficient
process out of the reported techniques.
Dr.Hemant Manuj (2018), This Article indicates the importance of ALM system in financial
institutions. It refers ALM as mismatches between the profiles of Assets and Liabilities. ALM
process requires a deep understanding of the structure and behavior of all assets and liabilities in
a dynamic state of the world. In practice, Financial Institutions monitors their ALM risks on the
basis of two key ALM reports: Liquidity Report and Interest rate sensitivity Report. A sound
ALM framework is critical for the financial health of an FI. The boards and management should
review their internal ALM processes, limits, tools and techniques, models and expertise and take
appropriate corrective steps whenever required. The stakeholders like the creditor, shareholder,
analysts and even regulators need to pay closer attention to the ALM process.
Dr. K. Prince Paul Antony (2018), Asset Liability Management is one of the vital tool for risk
management in banks. The banks have to work properly with respect to ALM so as to increase
their performance. Moreover, the function of ALM is not just protection from risk. The safety
achieved ALM opens up opportunities for enhancing the net worth. To study Asset & Liabilities
in banks and evaluate the impact of ALM profitability of banks by using ratios. The analysis of
ALM in Indian Banks will be carried out for the sample period from 2014 to 2018. It provides
the necessary framework to define, measure, monitor, modify and manage this risks.
N.M Darshan and C. Yogashree (2019), Assets and Liability Management (ALM) is one of the
significant tool of risk management. Indian banking sector is exposed to various risk prevailing
in the market like liquidity risk, interest rate risk, etc. Failure to identify these risks leads to
effect the financial position of banks and financial institutions. For this reason RBI come up with
Journal of Xi'an University of Architecture & Technology
Volume XI, Issue XII, 2019
Issn No : 1006-7930
Page No: 1318
the tool of ALM. The study found that the bank is exposed to risk, facing liquidity problems for
short term. It also find out that the quality of assets affects the financial performance the banks.
DATA ANALYSIS & INTERPRETATION
1) LIQUIDITY GAP ANALYSIS
Statement of structural liquidity showing the mismatch between assets and liabilities i.e.
(<=1year) for 5 financial years from 2014-2015 to 2018-2019.
Table no: 1 (Rupees in Lakhs)
Interpretation
The rupee assets for the year 2014-2015 are 80000.14 and the liabilities are 70534.77,
therefore there is a positive gap of 9465.37.
The rupee assets for the year 2015-2016 are 80261.52 and the liabilities are 51322.96,
therefore there is a positive gap of 28938.56.
The rupee assets for the year 2016-2017 are 74564.05 and the liabilities are 62487.94,
therefore there is a positive gap of 12076.11.
The rupee assets for the year 2017-2018 are 121111.35 and the liabilities are 59889.06,
therefore there is a positive gap of 61222.29.
The rupee assets for the year 2018-2019 are 53229.13 and the liabilities are 70617.21,
therefore there is a negative gap of -17388.08.
The Total Assets for five financial year i.e.2014-2015 to 2018-2019 are 409166.2 and the
Total Liabilities are 314851.9, therefore there is a positive gap of 94314.25.
Statement of structural liquidity showing the mismatch between assets and liabilities i.e.
(>1 year & upto 3 years) for 5 financial years from 2014-2015 to 2018-2019.
Table no: 2 (Rupees in Lakhs)
Particulars 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 TOTAL
Rupee Assets 80000.14 80261.52 74564.05 121111.35 53229.13 409166.2
Rupee Liabilities 70534.77 51322.96 62487.94 59889.06 70617.21 314851.9
Surplus/Deficit 9465.37 28938.56 12076.56 61222.29 -17388.08 94314.25
S/D% 56.39 13.42 19.33 102.23 -24.62
Journal of Xi'an University of Architecture & Technology
Volume XI, Issue XII, 2019
Issn No : 1006-7930
Page No: 1319
Particulars 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 TOTAL
Rupee Assets 160577.05 82996.01 96028.45 68359.7 78420.73 486382
Rupee Liabilities 65836.08 70945.74 73153.81 70275.28 70208.25 350419
Surplus/Deficit 94740.97 12050.27 22874.94 -1915.58 8212.48 135963
S/D % 143.9 16.99 31.27 -2.73 11.7
Interpretation
The rupee assets for the year 2014-2015 are 160577.05 and the liabilities are 65836.08,
therefore there is a positive gap of 94740.97.
The rupee assets for the year 2015-2016 are 82996.01 and the liabilities are 70945.74,
therefore there is a positive gap of 12050.27.
The rupee assets for the year 2016-2017 are 96028.45 and the liabilities are 73153.81,
therefore there is a positive gap of 22874.94.
The rupee assets for the year 2017-2018 are 68359.7 and the liabilities are 70275.28,
therefore there is a negative gap of -1915.58.
The rupee assets for the year 2018-2019 are 78420.73 and the liabilities are 70208.25,
therefore there is a positive gap of 8212.48.
The Total Assets for five financial year i.e.2014-2015 to 2018-2019 are 486382 and the
Total Liabilities are 350419, therefore there is a positive gap of 135963.
Statement of structural liquidity showing the mismatch between assets and liabilities i.e.
(>3 years & upto 5 years) for 5 financial years from 2014-2015 to 2018-2019.
Table no: 3 (Rupees in Lakhs)
Particulars 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 Total
Rupee Assets 3339.95 66668.06 37629.23 21500.05 54605.14 183742.4
Rupee Liabilities 40228.76 45971.79 50793.77 44771.45 14720 196486
Surplus/Deficit -36888.8 20696.27 -13164.5 -23271.4 39885.14 -12743.3
S/D% -91.69 45.02 -25.92 -51.98 270.96
Interpretation
The rupee assets for the year 2014-2015 are 3339.95 and the liabilities are 40228.76,
therefore there is a negative gap of -36888.8.
Journal of Xi'an University of Architecture & Technology
Volume XI, Issue XII, 2019
Issn No : 1006-7930
Page No: 1320
The rupee assets for the year 2015-2016 are 66668.06 and the liabilities are 45971.79,
therefore there is a positive gap of 20696.27.
The rupee assets for the year 2016-2017 are 37629.23 and the liabilities are 50793.77,
therefore there is a negative gap of -13164.5.
The rupee assets for the year 2017-2018 are 21500.05 and the liabilities are 44771.45,
therefore there is a negative gap of -23271.4.
The rupee assets for the year 2018-2019 are 54605.14 and the liabilities are 14720,
therefore there is a positive gap of 39885.14.
The Total Assets for five financial year i.e.2014-2015 to 2018-2019 are 183742.4 and the
Total Liabilities are 196486, therefore there is a negative gap of -12743.3.
Statement of structural liquidity showing the mismatch between assets and liabilities i.e.
(>5 years & upto 7 years) for 5 financial years from 2014-2015 to 2018-2019.
Table no: 4.4 (Rupees in Lakhs)
Particulars 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 TOTAL
Rupee Assets 6501.69 25511.06 32661.62 18913.5 25899.43 109487.3
Rupee Liabilities 51728.73 46712.95 14720 4160 0 117321.7
Surplus/Deficit -45227 -21201.9 17941.62 14753.5 25899.43 -7834.38
S/D % -87.43 -45.39 121.89 354.65 NIL
Interpretation
The rupee assets for the year 2014-2015 are 6501.69 and the liabilities are 51728.73,
therefore there is a negative gap of -45227.
The rupee assets for the year 2015-2016 are 25511.06 and the liabilities are 46712.95,
therefore there is a negative gap of -21201.9.
The rupee assets for the year 2016-2017 are 32661.62 and the liabilities are 14720,
therefore there is a positive gap of 17941.62.
The rupee assets for the year 2017-2018 are 18913.5 and the liabilities are 4160, therefore
there is a positive gap of 14753.5.
The rupee assets for the year 2018-2019 are 25899.43 and the liabilities are 0, therefore
there is a positive gap of 25899.43.
Journal of Xi'an University of Architecture & Technology
Volume XI, Issue XII, 2019
Issn No : 1006-7930
Page No: 1321
The Total Assets for five financial year i.e.2014-2015 to 2018-2019 are 109487.3 and the
Total Liabilities are 117321.7, therefore there is a negative gap of -7834.38.
Statement of structural liquidity showing the mismatch between assets and liabilities i.e.
(>7 years & upto 10 years) for 5 financial years from 2014-2015 to 2018-2019.
Table no: 5 (Rupees in Lakhs)
Particulars 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 TOTAL
Rupee Assets 216.44 4000.09 6575.24 1369.79 3811.8 15973.36
Rupee Liabilities 15337.2 4160 0 0 0 19497.2
Surplus/Deficit -15120.8 -159.91 6575.24 1369.79 3811.8 -3523.84
S/D % -98.59 -3.84 NIL NIL NIL
Interpretation
The rupee assets for the year 2014-2015 are 216.44 and the liabilities are 15337.2,
therefore there is a negative gap of -15120.8.
The rupee assets for the year 2015-2016 are 4000.09 and the liabilities are 4160, therefore
there is a negative gap of -159.91.
The rupee assets for the year 2016-2017 are 6575.24 and the liabilities are 0, therefore
there is a positive gap of 6575.24.
The rupee assets for the year 2017-2018 are 1369.79 and the liabilities are 0, therefore
there is a positive gap of 1369.79.
The rupee assets for the year 2018-2019 are 3811.8 and the liabilities are 0, therefore
there is a positive gap of 3811.8.
The Total Assets for five financial year i.e.2014-2015 to 2018-2019 are 15973.36 and the
Total Liabilities are 19497.2, therefore there is a negative gap of -3523.84.
6. Statement of structural liquidity showing the mismatch between assets and liabilities i.e.
(>10 years) for 5 financial years from 2014-2015 to 2018-2019.
Table no: 6 (Rupees in Lakhs)
Particulars 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 Total
Rupee Assets 40730.24 40509.62 40548 40453.78 40877.17 203118.81
Rupee Liabilities 61143.22 61512.53 61998.49 63659.54 65775.62 314089.4
Journal of Xi'an University of Architecture & Technology
Volume XI, Issue XII, 2019
Issn No : 1006-7930
Page No: 1322
Surplus/Deficit -20413 -21502.9 -21450.5 -23205.8 -24898.5 -110970.6
S/D % -33.39 -34.14 -34.6 -36.45 -37.85
Interpretation
The rupee assets for the year 2014-2015 are 40730.24 and the liabilities are 61143.22,
therefore there is a negative gap of -20413.
The rupee assets for the year 2015-2016 are 40509.62 and the liabilities are 61512.53,
therefore there is a negative gap of -21502.9.
The rupee assets for the year 2016-2017 are 40548 and the liabilities are 61998.49,
therefore there is a negative gap of -21450.5.
The rupee assets for the year 2017-2018 are 40453.78 and the liabilities are 63659.54,
therefore there is a negative gap of -23205.8.
The rupee assets for the year 2018-2019 are 40877.17 and the liabilities are 65775.62,
therefore there is a negative gap of -24898.5.
The Total Assets for five financial year i.e.2014-2015 to 2018-2019 are 203118.81 and
the Total Liabilities are 314089.4, therefore there is a negative gap of -110970.6.
2) RATIO ANALYSIS
7. Statement of Net Worth from 2017-2018 to 2018-2019
Interpretation
The net worth of the corporation improved to Rs 705.22 crores as on 31-3-2019 from Rs 628.57
crores as on 31-3-2018. The net worth registered a growth of 12.19 % due to increased profits.
8. Statement of Capital Adequacy Ratio from 2017-2018 to 2018-2019
Year Capital Adequacy Ratio
2017-2018 24.21%
2018-2019 28.52%
Year Net Worth (In Crores)
2017-2018 628.57
2018-2019 705.22
Journal of Xi'an University of Architecture & Technology
Volume XI, Issue XII, 2019
Issn No : 1006-7930
Page No: 1323
Interpretation
The Capital Adequacy Ratio of the corporation improved to 28.52% as on 31-3-2019 from
24.21% as on 31-3-2018. The increase in net worth has lead to increase in Capital Adequacy
Ratio (CAR).
9. Statement of Operating Profit Ratio from 2017-2018 to 2018-2019
Interpretation
The above table shows the relationship between the Operating Profits and Net Income. The
operating profit ratio is showing an increasing trend over a period of time from 2017-2018 to
2018-2019.The operating profit in the year 2017-2018 is 0.21, and in the year 2018-2019 it is
increased to 0.28. It means the operating profits and net income also increased.
10 Statement of Return on Total Assets from 2017-2018 to 2018-2019
Year
Net Income
(In Crores)
Total Assets
(In Crores)
Return on Total
Assets
2017-2018 58.73 277278.48 0.0211
2018-2019 89.08 266357.21 0.0334
Interpretation
The above table shows the relationship between the Net Income and Total Assets. The Return on
Assets is showing an increasing trend over a period of time from 2017-2018 to 2018-2019. The
Return on Assets in the year 2017-2018 is 0.0211%, and in the year 2018-2019 it is increased to
0.0334%. A return of 10% is considered as the ideal ratio. But the return is less than 10%. It
indicates the lower productivity of the resources in APSFC.
Year Operating Profit (In Crores) Net Income (In Crores)
2017-2018 90.35 43856.4
2018-2019 126.35 45724.29
Journal of Xi'an University of Architecture & Technology
Volume XI, Issue XII, 2019
Issn No : 1006-7930
Page No: 1324
FINDINGS
ALM technique is aimed to tackle the market risks and its objective is to stabilize &
improve profitability of the firm
Implementation of ALM as a Risk Management tool is done using Maturity profiles and
Liquidity Gap analysis for a period of 5 years (i.e. from 2014-2015 to 2018-2019). Gap Analysis
reveals that gap is increasing year by year, which is not a good sign for the company.
The Total Assets for five financial year i.e.2014-2015 to 2018-2019 are 409166.2 and the
Total Liabilities are 314851.9, therefore there is a positive gap of 94314.25.
The Total Assets for five financial year i.e.2014-2015 to 2018-2019 are 486382 and the
Total Liabilities are 350419, therefore there is a positive gap of 135963.
The Total Assets for five financial year i.e.2014-2015 to 2018-2019 are 183742.4 and the
Total Liabilities are 196486, therefore there is a negative gap of -12743.3.
The Total Assets for five financial year i.e.2014-2015 to 2018-2019 are 109487.3 and the
Total Liabilities are 117321.7, therefore there is a negative gap of -7834.38.
The Total Assets for five financial year i.e.2014-2015 to 2018-2019 are 15973.36 and the
Total Liabilities are 19497.2, therefore there is a negative gap of -3523.84.
The Total Assets for five financial year i.e.2014-2015 to 2018-2019 are 203118.81 and
the Total Liabilities are 314089.4, therefore there is a negative gap of -110970.6.
The Trend analysis of Structural Liquidity Statement variables of Andhra Pradesh State
Financial Corporation (APSFC) shows Increasing trend for the initial two years and it is
depicting Decreasing trend from 2016-2017 to 2018-2019
ALM presents a disciplined decision-making framework for a while at the same time
guarding the risk levels.
The net worth of the corporation improved to Rs 705.22 crores as on 31-3-2019 from Rs
628.57 crores as on 31-3-2018. The net worth registered a growth of 12.19 % due to increased
profits.
The Capital Adequacy Ratio of the corporation improved to 28.52% as on 31-3-2019
from 24.21% as on 31-3-2018. The increase in net worth has lead to increase in Capital
Adequacy Ratio (CAR).
Journal of Xi'an University of Architecture & Technology
Volume XI, Issue XII, 2019
Issn No : 1006-7930
Page No: 1325
The operating profit ratio is showing an increasing trend over a period of time from 2017-
2018 to 2018-2019. The operating profit in the year 2017-2018 is 0.21, and in the year 2018-
2019 it is increased to 0.28. It means the operating profits and net income also increased.
The Return on Assets is showing an increasing trend over a period of time from 2017-
2018 to 2018-2019.The Return on Assets in the year 2017-2018 is 0.0211%, and in the year
2018-2019 it is increased to 0.0334%. A return of 10% is considered as the ideal ratio. But the
return is less than 10%. It indicates the lower productivity of the resources in APSFC.
SUGGESTIONS
APSFC is facing mismatch year by year which is why it is facing high liquidity risk
exposure; It must focus on short term mismatches & monitor their cumulative mismatches across
all time buckets by establishing internal prudential limits with the approval of the board.
The liquidity position of the concern is not good & it can be improved by reducing Bad
debts, switching to short term loans, control overhead Expenses and speedup of the recovery
process on loans.
For Effective Asset Liability Management its policies & practises can be revised by
regular assessment of risk activities, Monitoring exposures, policy should state ALM objectives
for managing the risk associated with balance sheet, maintaining appropriate risk limits, policy
should provide clear lines of authority, responsibility, and accountability regarding risk
management activities.
They should strengthen its management information systems (MIS) and computer
processing capabilities for accurate measurement of liquidity in their Books
It is essential to remain vigilant to the events that effect its operating environment & react
accordingly in order to avoid any undesirable risks.
APSFC should concentrate on the management of Total assets and its returns.
It has been recommended that the company needs to maintain the same level of net
worth, Capital Adequacy ratio and operating profit in the future for the beneficiary of APSFC.
Journal of Xi'an University of Architecture & Technology
Volume XI, Issue XII, 2019
Issn No : 1006-7930
Page No: 1326
CONCLUSION
Asset Liability management plays a vital role in all banks and financial institutions.
Matching & Managing the assets and liabilities is crucial for every firm. Managing gap and
maintaining liquidity improves the overall performance and profitability of the firm. ALM
policies and practices must be revised and implemented at regular intervals so that the Risk is
managed efficiently and effectively. For Effective Asset Liability Management policies &
practises suggestive measures can be implemented as per the requirements of APSFC.
With the onset of liberalisation in India since 1991, Financial Institutions facing high
competition and exposed to more uncertainty & Risk. It makes an impact to make proper Asset
Liability Management in place. Effective Liquidity Management helps in avoiding deficiency in
liquidity and reduces liquidity risk. In this project Structural Liquidity Statements are analysed
for analysing gap between Assets & Liabilities. Liquidity Gap Analysis brings to notice that firm
is facing liquidity risk and it should implement provided suggestions to improve its liquidity
position.
In addition to ALM, selected ratios are calculated to know the profitability & efficiency;
Ratios serve as financial analyst in evaluating the performance & efficiency for proper
implementation of financial decisions. Overall financial health of APSFC is satisfactory.
Journal of Xi'an University of Architecture & Technology
Volume XI, Issue XII, 2019
Issn No : 1006-7930
Page No: 1327
References:
Raghavan, R.S (2005) Risk Management –overview in S.B verma (2nd edition). Risk
Management, Deep and Deep publication private ltd, New Delhi.
Ravi Kumar (2005), Asset and Liability Management (2nd edition), Vision Books.
Shashi K Gupta, R.K.Sharma and Anuj Gupta (2014), Management Accounting (2nd
Edition), Kalyani Publication.
Dr.R Umarani and M Jayanthi (2015) ‘An analysis of ALM in Indian banks’,
International Journal of Business & Administration Research Review,Vol.1 Issue.11,pages 179-
183,September. Source: https://www.researchgate.net
Eugenia Ana Matis and Crenguta Alina Matis (2015) ‘Liquidity Risk Management in
Post-Crisis Conditions’, Journal of Procedia Economics and Finance, Vol. 32,pages 1188-1198.
Source: https://www.sciencedirect.com
Mr. Chetan Shetty and Ms. Pooja Patel (2016) ‘An analysis on Asset Liability
Management’, International Journal of Research in IT and Management (IJRIM),Vol.6,Issue 10,
Oct, pages 92-98. Source: https://www.eurosiapub.org
S.P. Joshi & Dr. R. V. Sontakay (2017) ‘A study on Asset Liability Management in
banking system’, Imperial Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, Vol.3 Issue.6. Source:
https://www.onlinejournal.in
Dr.Hemant Manuj (2018) ‘Asset Liability Management in Financial Institutions’, Journal
of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research.
Source: https://www.businessworld.in
Dr. K. Prince Paul Antony (2018) ‘A study on ALM in Indian Bank’, International
Journal of Business Administration and Management, Vol.8, pages: 1-9. Source:
https://www.ripublication.com
N.M Darshan and C. Yogashree (2019) ‘A study on effect of Asset Liability Management
on financial performance’, International Journal of Research in Engineering, Science and
Management, Vol.2, Issue.6,pages 654-659,June.
Source: https://www.ijresm.com
Journal of Xi'an University of Architecture & Technology
Volume XI, Issue XII, 2019
Issn No : 1006-7930
Page No: 1328
Elijah Adeyinka Adedeji (2014) ‘A tool for Measuring Organization performance using
Ratio Analysis’, Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, Vol.5. Source:
https://www.iiste.org
Satvir Kaur (2016) ‘Ratio Analysis’, Imperial Journal of Interdisciplinary Research
(IJIR), Vol.2, Issue.12. Source: https://www.onlinejournal.com
Md. Khalifa Blaao (2016) ‘Financial Analysis by using Profitability Ratios’, Journal of
Economics and Finance, Vol.7, Issue.3.
Source: https://www.iosrjournals.org
Annual Reports of Andhra Pradesh State Financial Corporation (APSFC) From
2014-2015 To 2018-2019
Websites
https://www.apsfc.com
https://m.rbi.org.in
https://en.wikipedia.org.com
https://www.investopedia.com
https://www.businessmanagementideas.com
https://www.findevgateway.org
Newspapers:
Business Standard
Business Line
Economic Times
Journal of Xi'an University of Architecture & Technology
Volume XI, Issue XII, 2019
Issn No : 1006-7930
Page No: 1329