+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Buckling and free vibration of elastic plates using simple and mixed shear deformation theories

Buckling and free vibration of elastic plates using simple and mixed shear deformation theories

Date post: 08-Jan-2023
Category:
Upload: kfs
View: 0 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
15
Acta Mechanica 146, 183 197 (2001) ACTA MECHANICA Springer-Verlag 2001 Buclding and free vibration of elastic plates using simple and mixed shear deformation theories A. M. Zenkour, Kafr El-Sheikh, Egypt (Received January 18, 1999; revised October 15, 1999) Summary. Simple and mixed shear deformable theories accounting for the transverse shear, in the sense of Reissner-Mindlin's thick plate theory, are employed in the construction of variational statements for rectangular flat plates. Analytical solutions for natural frequencies and buckling loads of anisotropic plates under various boundary conditions are developed. A variety of simply-supported, clamped and free boundary conditions is considered, and comparisons with the existing literature are made. 1 Introduction The classical plate theory based on the Kirchhoff hypothesis for homogeneous and composite plates is inadequate, even if the plate is fairly thin [1]-[3]. It underestimates deflections and overestimates stresses, natural frequencies and buckling loads. Refined plate theories altowing one a more adequate description of structural response characteristics are needed. They should include transverse shear deformation and transverse normal stress and should account for the higher-order effects. They provide improved global response estimates for deflections, stresses, vibration frequencies and buckling loads of moderately thick plates when compared to the classical plate theory. In these theories the displacements or stresses (or both) are expanded as a linear combination of the thickness coordinate and undetermined functions of position in the reference surface to reduce the three-dimensional (3D) elasticity problem to a 2D one. The usual refined theory considered in the treatment of the dynamic response of flat orthotropic plates is the simple first-order transverse shear deformation plate theory (SFPT) [4]-[10]. The theory is given for statics by Reissner [4], [5] and extended to dynamics by Mindlin [6]. In this theory, the in-plane displacements are expanded up to the first term in the thickness coordinate, and the rotations of normals to the mid-surface are assumed to be inde- pendent of the transverse deflection. Related to SFPT, it is well known that: (i) it requires the introduction of transverse shear correction factor; (ii) disregards the effect of transverse normal stress; and (iii) involves a constant distribution of transverse shear stresses across the thickness which prevents from fulfilling the tangential conditions on the bounding planes. In the case of multilayered composite structures the same shortcoming appears in the fulfill- ment of continuity conditions at the layer interfaces (see [11]-[18]). For SFPT, any varia- tional principle may be used to derive a consistent set of differential equations governing the motion of the plate.
Transcript

Acta Mechanica 146, 183 197 (2001) ACTA MECHANICA �9 Springer-Verlag 2001

Buclding and free vibration of elastic plates using simple and mixed shear deformation theories

A. M. Zenkour, Kafr El-Sheikh, Egypt

(Received January 18, 1999; revised October 15, 1999)

Summary. Simple and mixed shear deformable theories accounting for the transverse shear, in the sense of Reissner-Mindlin's thick plate theory, are employed in the construction of variational statements for rectangular flat plates. Analytical solutions for natural frequencies and buckling loads of anisotropic plates under various boundary conditions are developed. A variety of simply-supported, clamped and free boundary conditions is considered, and comparisons with the existing literature are made.

1 Introduction

The classical plate theory based on the Kirchhoff hypothesis for homogeneous and composite

plates is inadequate, even if the plate is fairly thin [1]-[3]. It underestimates deflections and overestimates stresses, natural frequencies and buckling loads. Refined plate theories altowing

one a more adequate description of structural response characteristics are needed. They

should include transverse shear deformation and transverse normal stress and should account

for the higher-order effects. They provide improved global response estimates for deflections,

stresses, vibration frequencies and buckling loads of moderately thick plates when compared to the classical plate theory. In these theories the displacements or stresses (or both) are

expanded as a linear combination of the thickness coordinate and undetermined functions of position in the reference surface to reduce the three-dimensional (3D) elasticity problem to a 2D one.

The usual refined theory considered in the treatment of the dynamic response of flat orthotropic plates is the simple first-order transverse shear deformation plate theory (SFPT)

[4]-[10]. The theory is given for statics by Reissner [4], [5] and extended to dynamics by Mindlin [6]. In this theory, the in-plane displacements are expanded up to the first term in the thickness coordinate, and the rotations of normals to the mid-surface are assumed to be inde- pendent of the transverse deflection. Related to SFPT, it is well known that:

(i) it requires the introduction of transverse shear correction factor; (ii) disregards the effect of transverse normal stress; and

(iii) involves a constant distribution of transverse shear stresses across the thickness which prevents from fulfilling the tangential conditions on the bounding planes.

In the case of multilayered composite structures the same shortcoming appears in the fulfill- ment of continuity conditions at the layer interfaces (see [11]-[18]). For SFPT, any varia- tional principle may be used to derive a consistent set of differential equations governing the motion of the plate.

184 A.M. Zenkour

In the mixed first-order transverse shear deformation plate theory (MFPT), both the dis- placements and stresses must be considered arbitrary. For this reason a mixed variational for-

mula should be used [19]-[24]. The utilization of the mixed variational principles allows one to treat the plate problems by introducing kinematics assumptions with any power of the thickness coordinate. Also the transverse shear stresses are consistent with the surface condi- tions. So, the rationale for the shear correction factor required to the SFPT is obviated. In addition, the effect of transverse normal stress is taken into account.

In the present study, a relationship between the simple and mixed first-order transverse shear deformation theories is presented. The free vibration and buckling problems of ortho- tropic and transversely-isotropic (transtropic) flat plates with various boundary conditions are developed. The edges y = 0, b will be considered simply-supported while the remaining ones, x = 0, a, having arbitrary combinations of edge conditions. Numerical results of natural frequencies and critical buckling loads of such plates are presented. Comparisons with some of the available results (obtained for simply-supported edge conditions) are undertaken and appropriate conclusions concerning the various effects are formulated.

2 Derivation of governing equations

Consider a rectangular plate of length a, width b and uniform thickness h. The mid-plane of the plate will be taken as the xy plane, and the x- and y-axes are directed along the edges. The z-axis is taken perpendicular to the mid-plane and positive in a downward direction. Let the plate be subjected to a distributed transverse load f as well as the in-plane edge forces $1 and $2 (applied in the directions x and y, respectively, and considered positive in tension).

We start in the usual way by proposing the first-order displacement field:

Ul(x ,y , z , t ) : u (x ,y , t ) 4- z r

where (u, v, w) denote the displacements of a point (x, y) on the mid-plane, and ~p and ~ are the rotations of normals to mid-plane about the y- and x-axes, respectively.

The strain field for the assumed displacement field follows immediately as

Ou O~ Ov O~ s :~4-Z = - - , Oz ' c22 ~ y + Z Oy

Ow Ow e23 ~ + Oy ' e13 = ~ 4- 0~ ,

s = 0

0v 0r "

(2)

For SFPT, the stress-strain relations of an orthotropic body are given by

i +oo 0"2S2 C12 C22 0 0

0"$3 = 0 C44 0 0

CrlS 3 0 0 c55 0

O'$2 0 0 0 C66

o[+11} 0 ~22

g'23 :

s

s

(3)

Simple and mixed shear deformation theories 185

in which c~j are the t ransformed material constants. Note that the transverse normal stress eras a

is dropped. The stress resultants in this case are given by

+h/2 {N;Sq, M~;Sq}= f @q{1 , z }dz ,

+h/2 @s 3 = f Kp0.Sadz, (p,q = 1,2) ,

-h/2

(4)

where Kp (K1 = K2 = k) are shear factors to correct for the errors stemming from (2) that 0.s 3

and 0.s a are constants over the thickness of the plate (i.e., are not functions of z). For M F P T , the stress and displacement fields are taken to be arbitrary. Then, the non-.

vanishing stress field is assumed to be of the form [19], [22]:

% ~ = G ( ~ y) 1 - z p3 \ ~

4

0"33 ~ 33 k ~ r = l .

(p,q = 1,2).

(5)

The functions G (~ , G(~ ) and G~ ~ may be got easily from the point that the stresses apMq and 0.~;~a ~ satisfy the following stress resultants:

+h/2

-h/2

QplV~ = f 0.~,~dz, ( p , q = 1,2). -h/2

(6)

M satisfies the Also the functions G ~ ) arise f rom the point that the transverse normal stress 0-33 following conditions:

+h/2 +h/2 0.3~ lz=_h/~ = -- f 0.~ , y dz:O, f z0. dz:O. (7)

-5/2 -h/2

Therefore, the final expressions for the stress components can be written in terms of their resultants and the thickness coordinate z:

Pq ~- z ~ - 3 Q p 3 1-- M % h ~ ' - 2--h- '

0.33=~- 1 - 2 - 5 1 - z , (p,q = 1,2) .

(s)

It is to be noted that the transverse shear stresses 0.~a~ and 0.~ are functions of z and vanish on the bounding planes (z = •

186 A.M. Zenkour

2.1 Equations o f motion

The simple and mixed variational formulations based upon Hamilton's principle are given, respectively, by [19], [22]:

] 0 = f fff (~i%6ui + 6U s) dv + 6V s dr, hi . V

(9)

t2F ] 0 = f fff (~gi6ui + 5(a~sij) - 6R ~) dv + 6V M dr,

t l k v (lO)

where (h, t2) is a time interval; ~ is the density of the undeformed body, U s is the strain energy density, and R M is the complementary energy density. Note that quantities with superscript "S" refer to the SFPT while quantities with "M" refer to the MFPT. The potential energy V ~ (a = S, M) of the applied loads can be defined as a function of displacement field ui and the applied loads as follows:

v s : -fffB{u{ dv - ffFiui ds, (11) v s~

V M = - f f f B i u i dv - f fF~u i ds - f f n j c~g(u i - u~) ds , v so s~

(12)

where nj are the components of the unit vector along the outward normal to the total surface S~ + S~; B~ are the body forces measured per unit volume of the undeformed body; F~ are the prescribed components of the stress vector, per unit area of the surface S~, and u* are the prescribed components of the displacements of the remaining surface S,. In the absence of the body forces and the prescribed displacements, we have for the first varia- tion of V ~

j r ( awa owa ) gV ~ = S, -~z-~z +$2 O~ O y - f 6was . s~

(13)

The next step in deriving the governing equations consists of the substitution of Eqs. (1), (2), (3), (8), and (13) into the two variational formulations (9) and (10). The extremum conditions give the following dynamic equations:

oNgl 0N~2 ~h~ = ~ + Oy

oN~: ONe2

o ~h /~=-~ -x + ~ - y + f + ~ x x SI~X- x +~yy $2 ,

h 3 .. 0M~1 OM~s ~ h 3 OM~2 0M~2 o ~ ~ - o x ~--~-y - Q13 , Q -i~ ~ = Ox +--O~-y - Q23 "

(14)

Simple and mixed shear deformation theories 18~

2.2 Boundary conditions

The form of the geometric and force boundary conditions is also given below:

G e o m e t r i c (Es sen t ia l ) F o r c e ( N a t u r a l )

v Ng2n~ + N~2%

(o Q~% + s~ ~ ~ : + Q~ + s~ ~ ~ OyJ y

M~2nx + M~2n~

(15)

where (n~, nv) denote the direction cosines of a unit normal to the boundary of the mid-plane.

2.3 Constitutive equations

For the SFPT, the stress resultants are related to the strains by Eq. (3) while for the M F P T

they will be derived f rom the extremum condition of the mixed variational formulat ion (10). In general, the constitutive equations are given by:

01 N~2 = ~ A2~ 0 ~yy ,

NI~ 0 A~6 Ov Ou

M~2 = 2 z~ 0 y '

M~2 0 D~6 0p 0r

where

Q 2~ = A~ ( ~ + O~y ) ,

QI~ = A5a5 ( r + 0~xW) ,

(16.1)

(16.2)

V ] [ 1-1 A1N~ AIM : h all al2 M _ 5h M h L A~2 A~{ L. a12 a22 .J ' A,.,. 6a~r ' A66 a66

h 2 = , = a = ~ ( r 4 , 5 ; 1 , 2 , 6 ) . As~ hkc~.,, ASq hccq , Dpq ~ Avq , = p, q =

For an orthotropic body the elastic constants eij and compliances aij may be expressed in terms of the engineering orthotropic characteristics as:

E1 E2 P'I 2 E1 r'21 62 -- , c12 -- -- , c22 -- , (17.1)

ell i -- /-'12/]21 1 -- /.112/-121 1 -- /-112/.'21 I -- /212/221

188 A.M. Zenkour

1 1 1 C44 = G23 = - - , c55 = G13 - , c66 = G12 = - - ; (17.2)

a44 a55 566

1 u12 /"21 1 a 2 2 = - - �9 ( 1 7 . 3 ) all = ~ , a12 -

E1 E2 E2

Here, Ei, G# and u~j stand for Young's moduli, shear moduli and Poisson's ratios, respec-

tively. In the case of a transtropic body, the specialized counterparts of (17) become:

E Ev E 5 1 1 = C22 1 - - //' 2 ' C 1 2 1 - - 1,,2 ' C4 4 = 5 5 5 = G ' , e66 = G = 2(1 + u) (18)

1 u 1 1

511 =522 :-- : 512-- ~ a44 =555 = ~ ~ a66 =-- �9 E E G

3 Solution procedure

The simple and mixed variational formulations will be extended here in order to analyze the

free vibration and the buckling problems of rectangular plates. The S F P T and M F P T will be

established in this section by suppressing the in-plane displacement degrees of freedom.

The following boundary conditions are considered:

(i) at edges y = 0, b:

Simply-supported (S): w = #? = M~2 = 0,

(ii) at edges x = 0, a:

Simply-supported (S): w = ~ = M~I = 0,

Clamped (C): w = ~ = ~ = 0, Ow

Free (F): M~I = M~2 = Qla3 q- S1-0~ z = 0.

3.1 The free vibration problem

The following representation for the displacement quantities (deleting stretching effects) is

appropriate in the analysis of the free vibration problem ($1 = 5'2 = f = 0):

r = gJm~ X'(AmX) sin#ny ~ e i~t ,

qe.~n X(A,~x) cos PnY )

(19)

where w(=cz,~n) denotes the eigenfrequency associated with the (m,n) th eigenmode, #n = nrc/b, and W,~, kP,~n and ~ , ~ being arbitrary parameters. The function X(A,~x) can be

constructed for any combination of simply-supported (S), clamped (C) and free (F) bound- ary conditions on the edges x = 0, a. The different forms of X (Amx) and the corresponding

values of A,~ are defined in the Appendix [25] (see also [21]). Substitution of Eqs. (2), (3), (8), and (16) considered in conjunction with (19) in:th6 varia-

tional formulations (9) and (10) yields a system of algebraic equations expressed in a compact

form as

([L] - w2[R]) {A} = {0}, (20)

Simple and mixed shear deformation theories

where {A} denotes the column

{zi} ..... .....

The elements of the symmetric matrices [L] and [R] are expressed as:

LII 2 ~ 2 ct o~ = X~Asf2 + #~A44~1, L12 = A~A~5~2,

~2 Oo~ c 2 ~ a Lla = #nA44{1, Lu2 = m 1193 -- #nD66g2 + Asa~2,

L23 = Ara#n(D66{2 - D12~'4 ) ,

ha t t l l ohm1, R22 = 0 ~ ~2 ,

where

: 2

0

~:3 = ) [ J ( H( /~mZ) ]2 dx, 0

2 a 2 a c~' L33 = /~mD66~2 -}- #nD22~1 + A44~1 ;

h 3 R33 = ~o ~-~ ~1 , R12 = Rla = R2a = 0,

~2 = )" [X'(Amx)] 2 dx , 0

0

The condition expressed by det ([L] - ~2 [R]) = 0 yields the eigenfrequencies w.

189

(21)

(22)

(2a)

3.2 The static buckling problem

The representation in (19) specialized for a~ -+ 0 is appropriate in dealing with the (static) compressive buckling problem. The simplest case, to derive some results which concern the

buckling of rectangular plates, is obtained when the forces 5'1 and $2 are constant throughout

the plate, and the dynamic as well as the transversal load terms are dropped. Assuming that

there is a given ratio between these forces so that & = - /3 and $2 = -~/3; ,7 = 52/$1, we get

([L 1 - ,8[5]) {zi} = {0}. (24)

The matrices {A} and [L] are defined in Eqs. (21) and (22), respectively, while the elements

S# = Sji of [5] are given by

511 = /~2,~2 JF ~#2r~1 ; 512 = 513 = 522 = 523 = 533 = 0 . (25)

Solving (24) for the boundary conditions, we shall find that the assumed buckling of the plate

is possible only for definite values of/3. The smallest of these values determines the desired cri- tical value.

I f the forces & and 52 are not constant, the problem becomes more involved, since Eq. (24) has in this case variable coefficients, but the general conclusion remains the same. Let, for example [26]

5 1 = - ~ ( 1 - C 0 b ) , 5 2 = 0 , (26)

where co is a numerical factor. Equation (24) is still the same while the elements of [S] become

511 = A~2 1 -- ~ - C O ; 512 = 513 = 522 = 523 = 533 = 0 . (27)

190 A.M. Zenkour

By changing co, we can obtain various particular cases. For example, c0 = 0 corresponds to

the case of a uniformly distributed compressive force ($1 = -/3, ~/= 0), and for co = 2 we

obtain the case of pure bending. All other values give a combinat ion of bending and compres-

sion (Co < 2) or tension (co > 2).

4 Discussion of the results

In order to put into evidence the influence of rotatory inertias, of the shear deformations and

of orthotropic and transtropic material characteristics, we shall consider several numerical

applications. This will be done for the case of the orthotropic material:

E1 = 20.83 Msi, /772 = 10.94 Msi, /773 = 10.00 Msi, ul2 = u13 = 0.44,

G12 = 6.10Msi, G~3 = 3.71Msi, G23 = 6.19Msi, us2 = 0.23,

as well as for the transtropic material defined by:

E = 20.83 Msi, U = 10.00 Msi, G ~ = 3.71 Msi, u = u ~ = 0.44.

The numerical applications are done, unless otherwise stated, using M F P T for homo-

geneous flat plates with various boundary conditions. The designations SS, CC, CS, and CF refer to the edge conditions at x = 0, a, only. The edges y = 0, b are invariably assumed to be

simply-supported. For the cases of the orthotropic and transtropic plates and for the input

data presented above, Tabs. 1 - 4 display the eigenfrequencies and critical buckling loads

obtained in the framework of various theories. The exact three-dimensional elasticity solu-

tions of Srinivas and Rao [27] for simply-supported square plates are used to asses the

improvement in the prediction of frequencies. The results obtained in [28], as per the higher-

order shear deformation theory (HSDT) developed by Reddy, and of the theory referred to as

DT, specialized for 6A = 0 developed in [29] by Librescu et al. (see also [30]), are also used in

the comparisons.

The present results obtained using M F P T are found to be in excellent agreement with

their counterparts available in the field literature, obtained for SS edge conditions (see

Table 1. Eigenfrequencies, aJ = aJh,~/ev, of a simply-supported orthotropic square plate (a/h = 10)

SFPT s

3 ~_2 5 m n Exact s HSDT b DT ~ MFPT d k = 1 k = ~- k = ~ /c = ~-

1 1 0.047 4 0.047 4 0.047 4 0.047 4 0.047 7 0.047 2 0.047 4 0.047 4 1 2 0.1033 0.1033 0.1032 0.1032 0.1042 0.1025 0.1031 0.1032 2 1 0.1188 0.1189 0.1187 0.1187 0.1207 0.1174 0.1185 0.1187 2 2 0.1694 0.1695 0.1692 0.1691 0.1724 0.1670 0.1688 0.1691 1 3 0.1888 0.1888 0.1884 0.1883 0.1910 0.1865 0.1880 0.1883 3 1 0.2180 0.2184 0.2177 0.2175 0.2240 0.2135 0.2170 0.2175 2 3 0.247 5 0.247 7 0.246 9 0.246 5 0.252 2 0.242 9 0.246 1 0.246 5 3 2 0.262 4 0.262 9 0.261 9 0.261 4 0.269 5 0.256 4 0.260 8 0.261 4 1 4 0.2969 0.2969 0.2958 0.2949 0.301 0 0.29l 1 0.2945 0,2949 4 1 0.3319 0.3330 0.3310 0.3299 0.3436 0.3217 0.3289 0.3299 3 3 0.3320 0.3326 0.3310 0.3297 0.3406 0.3230 0.3289 0.3297 2 4 0.347 6 0.347 9 0.346 2 0.344 6 0.354 0 0.338 7 0.343 8 0.344 6 4 2 0.3670 0.3720 0.3695 0.3677 0.3831 0.3584 0.3665 0.3677

Results obtained in [27] using the 3D elasticity theory, b Results reported in [28] using HSDT. c Results reported in [29] using DT. a Results obtained in this paper.

Simple and mixed shear deformation theories 19 [

Table 2. Nondimensional fundamental frequencies c~ = a,'(a2/h) ~ / E 2 of a simply-supported ortho- tropic rectangular plate

SFPT

3 7r 2 5 a/b a/h DT MFPT k 1 k = ~- k = i2 k =

2.0 2 7.509 6.886 7.237 6.682 6.860 6.886 5 12.605 12.544 12.886 12.331 12.518 12.544

10 15.021 15.023 15.171 14.924 !5.011 15.023 20 15.948 15.950 15.995 15.920 15.947 15.950 50 16.257 16.250 16.258 16.245 16.250 I6.250

1.0 2 4.067 3.959 4.163 3.840 3.945 3.959 5 6.158 6.156 6.276 6.080 6.147 6.156

l0 6.901 6.902 6.945 6.874 6.899 6.902 20 7.144 7.144 7.156 7.136 7.143 7.144 50 7.226 7.217 7.219 7.216 7.217 7.217

0.5 2 2.966 2.932 3.081 2.844 2.921 2.932 5 4.321 4.321 4.395 4.274 4.316 4.32l

10 4.748 4.749 4.774 4.733 4.747 4.749 20 4.880 4.881 4.888 4.877 4.881 4.881 50 4.963 4.920 4.921 4.920 4.920 4.920

Table 3. Nondimensional critical buckling loads 9 = [Ja2/(haE1) of a simply-supported orthotropic square plate

SFPT

3 7r 2 5 7 a/h HSDT DT MFPT k 1 k = - - k - - k = - -

4 12 6

0.0 2 0.958 1 0.943 5 0.943 6 1.056 1 0.88t 5 0.935 8 0.943 6 5 2.0999 2.0978 2.0984 2.1871 2.0433 2.091 7 2.0984

10 2.570 6 2.570 4 2.5712 2.604 1 2.549 7 2.568 6 2.571 2 20 2.725 8 2.725 8 2.726 7 2.735 9 2.720 6 2.726 0 2.726 7 50 2.772 9 2.772 9 2.772 9 2.775 4 2.772 8 2.773 7 2.772 9

0.5 2 0.638 8 0.629 0 0.629 1 0.7041 0.587 7 0.623 8 0.629 1 5 1.3999 1.3986 1.3989 1.458 1 1.3622 1.3944 1.3989

10 1.7137 1.7136 1.7141 1.7361 1.6998 1.7124 1.7141 20 1.8172 1.8172 1.8178 t.8239 1.8137 1.8173 1.8178 50 1.8486 1.8486 1.8492 1.8502 1.8485 1.8491 1.8492

1.0 2 0.479 1 0.471 8 0.47l 8 0.5280 0.4407 0.4678 0.471 8 5 1.050 0 1,048 9 1.049 2 1,093 6 1_021 6 1.045 8 1.049 2

10 1.2853 1.2852 1.2856 1.302 1 1.2749 1.2843 1.2856 20 1.362 9 1.362 9 1.363 3 1.368 0 1.360 3 1.363 0 1.363 3 50 1.3864 1.3864 1.3869 1.3877 1.3864 1.3869 1.3869

Tabs. 1 - 4 ) . The results ob ta ined using var ious shear cor rec t ion coeff icients in S F P T are also

included. They are in g o o d ag reemen t wi th the results o f o ther invest igators . S F P T could

p rov ide m o r e rel iable results in the case o f k = 5/6 . In fact, M F P T yields ident ical results

wi th S F P T in which f r a m e w o r k the t ransverse shear cor rec t ion fac tor k (= 5 /6) is to be

incorpora ted . In addi t ion , the crit ical buckl ing loads for t rans t rop ic square plates ob ta ined

using M F P T and S F P T (k = 5 /6 ) are the same as those ob ta ined by Librescu et al. [29] (see

Tab le 4).

192 A.M. Zenkour

Table 4. Nondimensional critical buckling loads/3 /3a2/(haE) of a simply-supported transtropic square plate

SFPT

3 vr 2 5 7 a/h HSDT DT MFPT k = 1 k = - k = - k = -

4 12 6

0.0 2 0.9486 0.9197 0.9197 1.0560 0.8468 0.9104 0.9197 5 2.6386 2.6325 2.6325 2.7979 2.5327 2.6202 2.6325

10 3.5875 3.5868 3.5868 3.6605 3.5392 3.5810 3.5868 20 3.944 2 3.944 2 3.944 2 3.9661 3.929 7 3.942 5 3.944 2 50 4.0574 4.0574 4.0574 4.061 1 4.0549 4.057 1 4.0574

0.5 2 0.6324 0.613 1 0.613 1 0.7040 0.5646 0.6069 0.613 1 5 1.7591 1.7550 1.7550 1.8653 1.6885 1.7468 1.7550

10 2.3916 2.3912 2.3912 2.4403 2.3595 2.3874 2.3912 20 2.629 5 2.629 5 2.629 5 2.6441 2.619 8 2.628 3 2.629 5 50 2.7049 2.7049 2.7049 2.7074 2.7033 2.7047 2.7049

1.0 2 0.474 3 0.459 9 0.459 9 0.528 0 0.423 4 0.455 2 0.459 9 5 1.3193 1.3163 1.3163 1.3990 1.2663 1.3101 1.3163

10 1.7937 1.7934 1.7934 1.8302 1.7696 1.7905 1.7934 20 1.972 1 1.972 1 1.9721 1.983 1 1.964 8 1.9712 1.9721 50 2.028 7 2.028 7 2.028 7 2.030 5 2.027 5 2.028 5 2.028 7

Figures l, 3 and 4 display the variation of dimensionless fundamental frequency (�9 and

respectively of biaxial and uniaxial buckling loads (/~) vs the plate thickness ratio (= a/h). They reveal that the variations of c? and/~ are sensitive to the variation of the plate thickness

ratio and this irrespective of the considered boundary conditions. However the CF instance

constitutes an exception in the sense that the considered variation of a/h has little effect on

the variation ofc~ and/~. This effect may vanish for a/h >_ 5. Figures 2 and 5 display respectively the variation of cO and o f / J vs the plate aspect ratio

( - a/b). They reveal also the sensitivity of cO and/~ to the variation of a/b parameter. Figure 6

contains plots of the critical buckling loads (/3) as functions of transverse-to-axial buckling

ratio q/(= $2/$1). It reveals that 7 has a great effect on/~ irrespective of the boundary condi-

tions. Table 5 emphasizes the effects of the aspect ratio (a/b) and mode number (m) on the

natural frequencies of orthotropic plates. The frequencies increase with the increase of a/b and m. The CC case shows the highest sensitivity in the context of the considered edge condi-

tions. Finally, Table 6 contains the dimensionless critical buckling loads/3 of transtropic rectan-

gular plates under combined bending and compression, $ 1 = - - / 3 ( 1 - - Coy~b), $ 2 = 0. It reveals

that the variation of the critical buckling loads is very sensitive to the variation of the plate

aspect ratio. In addition, these critical buckling loads are increased with increasing the numer-

ical factor co, the thickness ratio a/h, and the aspect ratio a/b. In the case of a/b = 2 only,

and for other values of a/h and co, the CF instance shows the highest sensitivity.

5 Conclusions

The simple and mixed variational formulations are used to develop both the analytical and numerical solutions for anisotropic elastic plates based on Reissner-Mindlin's thick plate

theory. The plate is considered to be subjected to a distributed transverse load as well as in-plane edge forces. Numerical results are presented for natural frequencies and critical buckling loads of rectangular plates subjected to various edge conditions. Comparisons are

Simple and mixed shear deformation theories

12

O9

lO

8

6

4

2

a / b = 1 / C C

CF / f I i I i I i t i I

4 8 12 16 20

a / h

24

20

16

(0 12

8

4

q

0

0.25

a / h = L0 / .

CC CS SS

CF , I r I , I h I i I r i i I , I i

0.5 0.75 1 1.25 1.5 1.75 2 2.25 2.5

a / b

5

4

2

1

0

y = 1 ~ _ - ~ - C C

a / b = l

CS

SS

CF

, I i r , r i F ~ r

0 4 8 12 16 20

a / h

t923

Fig. 1. Effect of plate thickness ratio (a/h) on the nondimensional funda- mental frequency ~ = ,~(a2/h) ~/-~/E2

Fig. 2. Effect of plate aspect ratio (a/b) on the nondimensional funda- mental frequency ca = co(a2/h) ~ / E 2

Fig. 3. Effect of a/h on the biaxial critical buckling load ~ = 13a2/(haF_,2)

made to show that the results obtained using the present theories are in close agreement with

the available solutions in the literature. The results of M F P T and SFPT themselves are com-

pared to show the effect of the shear correction factors. Both M F P T and SEPT (with a proper

shear correction factor) allow one to treat the response in buckling and free vibration of

homogeneous plates for a variety of boundary conditions. In general, SFPT predicts frequen-

194 A.M. Zenkour

lO

9

8

7

5

4

3

2

1

7 = 0 a / b = l

i I i I h I i I

4 8 12 16

I C C

CS

SS

CF

i I

2O

a / h

6

5

4

2

CC

CS

SS

1 CF a / h = 10

0 T i ~ I , l i i T I T f t r I I

0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25 1.5 1.75 2 2.25 2.5

a / b

8 CC

7

6 CS

_ 5 SS

4 CF

3

2

1

0 i ] l l l l l l l ] i l l ] l

-0.5 0 0.5 l 1.5 2 2.5 3

a / h = l O

a / b = l

i I i r J

Fig. 4. Effect of a/h on the uniaxial critical buckling load/3 =/3a2/(haE2)

Fig. 5. Effect of plate aspect ratio (a/b) on the biaxial critical buckling load fl = fla2/(haE2)

Fig. 6. Effect of transverse-to-axial 3.5 4 4.5 5

buckling ratio (3') on the critical y buckling load fi = fla2/(h3E~)

cies and buckling loads significantly different from those of M F P T even if the transverse

shear correct ion factor (for SFPT) is assumed to be 5/6. This puts into evidence the great role

played by M F P T in the model ing of homogeneous plate theories, which in contrast to S F P T

does not require the incorpora t ion of a shear correct ion factor, since it is considered as a

consistent t reatment of transverse shear deformat ions in the anisotropic plates.

Simple and mixed shear deformation theories

l 'able 5. Eigenfrequencies a: ~h X/~/E2 of an orthotropic rectangular plate (a/h = 10, n = 1)

[95

7gb

a/b l 2 3 4 6 8 10

0.5 SS 0.0475 0.1536 0.3002 0.4663 0.8119 1.1477 1.4686 CC 0.0876 0.2135 0.3659 0.5310 0.8685 1.1964 1.5119 CS 0.0663 0.1835 0.3339 0.4998 0.841 1 1.1728 1.4907 CF 0.021 4 0.096 0 0.229 3 0.393 2 0.747 1 1.093 1 1.421 2

1.0 SS 0.0690 0.1729 0.3168 0.4804 0.8224 1.1559 1.4752 CC 0.1013 0.2274 0.3786 0.5424 0.8776 1.2038 1.518t CS 0.0840 0.1998 0.3484 0.5125 0.8509 1.1805 1.4972 CF 0.0427 0.1197 0.2490 0.4097 0.7589 1.101 9 1.428l

2.0 SS 0.1502 0.2462 0.3807 0.5354 0.8635 1.1880 1.5014 CC 0.1684 0.2860 0.4304 0.5882 0.9137 1.2333 1.5429 CS 0.1594 0.2657 0.4060 0.5626 0.8894 1.2112 1.5226 CF 0.1258 0.2027 0.3222 0.4725 0.8045 1.1364 1.4760

Table 6. Nondimensional critical buckling loads ~ = Sa2/(h3E) of transtropic rectangular plates under combined bending and compression

~ / h = 5 a /h = lo

co a/b SS CC CS CF SS CC CS CF

0.5 3.5583 6.6783 5.0189 1.7587 4.4027 11.0970 7.0165 1.9077 4

1.0 7.8975 9.7964 8.6512 7.8458 10.7603 16.3199 12.7401 9.5151 2.0 32.2171 28.6458 29.3255 54.8608 56.9330 53.7131 53.0970 90.8157

0.5 2.3722 4.4522 3.3460 1.1725 2.935 1 7.3980 4.6777 1.27t 8 1 1.0 5.2650 6.5310 5.7675 5.2306 7.1735 10.8799 8.4934 6.3434

2.0 21.478 t 19.0972 19.5503 36.5739 37.9553 35.8087 35.3980 60.5438

0.5 1.9768 3.7102 2.7883 0.977 1 2.4460 6.1650 3.898 1 1.0598 4 = 1.0 4.387 5 5.442 5 4.806 2 4.358 8 5.977 9 9.066 6 7.077 8 5.286 2 o 2.0 17.8984 15.9144 16.2920 30.4782 31.6294 29.8406 29.4983 50.4532

0.5 1.7792 3.3391 2.5095 0.8793 2.2014 5.5485 3.5083 0.9538 2

1.0 3.9488 4.8982 4.3256 3.9229 5.3801 8.1599 6.3701 4.7576 2.0 16.1085 14.3229 8.2100 27.4304 28.4665 26.8565 26.5485 45.4078

0.5 1.1861 2.2261 1.6730 0.5862 1.4676 3.6990 2.3388 0.6359 0 1.0 2.6325 3.2655 2.8837 2.6153 3.5868 5.4400 4.2467 3.1717

2.0 10.7390 9.5486 9.7752 18.2869 18.9777 17.9043 17.6990 30.2719

Appendix

The forms of the function X(A,~x) are given by:

SS sin A~,~x CC sin A.,x - sh A.~x - ~m(cos Ar~x - chAmx) (shAm - sin A.O/(ch Am -- COS Am) CS sin A~x - sh A~.:c - ~jm(cos A~z - chA.~z) (sh Xm § sin $,n)/(ch X m -}- COS/~m)

CF sin A~,x - sh A.~x - ~7.,~(cos Ar~x - chA~.x) (shA~ + sin A.~)/(ch Am + cos )~m)

196 A.M. Zenkour

The values of ~ (= A~a) corresponding to the function X(A~z) for various boundary conditions are given by:

7T~

1 2 3 4 _>5

SS 3.142 6.283 9.425 12.566 m~r CC 4.730 7.853 10.996 14.137 (m + 0.50) 7r CS 3.927 7.069 10.210 t3.352 (ra +0.25) 7r CF 1.875 4.694 7.855 10.996 (m - 0.50) :r

References

[1] Reissner, E., Stavsky, Y.: Bending and stretching of certain types of heterogeneous aelotropic elastic plates. ASME J. Appl. Mech. 28, 402-408 (1961).

[2] Whitney, J. M.: Structural analysis of laminated anisotropic plates. Lancaster: PA Technomic 1987. [3] Heuer, R., Irschik, H., Ziegler, F.: Dynamic analysis of polygonal Mindlin plates on two-paralneter

foundations using classical plate theory and an advanced BEM. Comput. Mech. 4, 293-300 (1989). [4] Reissner, E.: On the theory of bending of elastic plates. J. Math. Phys. 23, 184-191 (1944). [5] Reissner, E.: The effect of transverse shear deformation on the bending of elastic plates. ASME J.

Appl. Mech. 12, 69-77 (1945). [6] Mindlin, R. D.: Influence of rotatory inertia and shear on flexural motions ofisotropic, elastic plates.

ASME J. Appl. Mech. 18, 31-38 (1951). [7] Reissner, E.: On transverse bending of plates, including the effects of transverse shear deformation.

Int. J. Solids Struct. 11,569-573 (1975). [8] Dobyns, A. L.: Analysis of simply-supported orthotropic plates subject to static and dynamic loads.

AIAA J. 19, 642-650 (1981). [9] Irschik, H.: Membrane-type eigenmotions of Mindlin plates. Acta Mech. 55, 1 20 (1985).

[10] Heuer, R., Irschik, H.: A boundary element method for eigenvalue problems of polygonal membra- nes and plates. Acta Mech. 66, 9-20 (1987).

[l 1] Yang, P. C., Norris, C. H., Stavsky, Y.: Elastic wave propagation in heterogeneous plates. Int. J. Solids Struct. 2, 665 684 (1966).

[12] Whitney, J. M., Pagano, N. J.: Shear deformation in heterogeneous anisotropic plates. ASME J. Appl. Mech. 37, 1031-1036 (1970).

[13] Sun, C. T., Whitney, J. M.: Dynamic response of laminated composite plates under initial stress. AIAA J. 14, 268-270 (1976).

[14] Whitney, J. M., Sun, C. T.: Transient response of laminated composite plates subjected to transverse dynamics loading. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 61, 101 - 104 (1977).

[15] Reddy, J. N., Chao, W. C.: Non-linear bending of thick rectangular, laminated composite plates. Int. J. Non-Linear Mech. 16, 291-301 (1981).

[16] Reddy, J. N.: On the solutions to forced motions of rectangular composite plates. ASME J. Appl. Mech. 49, 403-408 (1982).

[17] Reddy, J. N.: Geometric nonlinear transient analysis of laminated composite plates. AIAA J. 21, 621-629 (1983).

[18] Chandrashekhara, K., Tenneti, R.: Non-linear static and dynamic analysis of heated laminated pla- tes: a finite element approach. Compos. Sci. Tech. 51, 85-94 (1994).

[19] Fares, M. E., Allam, M. N. M., Zenkour, A. M.: Hamilton's mixed variational formula for dynami- cal problems of anisotropic elastic bodies. SM Arch. 14, 103 - 114 (1989).

[20] Zenkour, A. M.: Maupertuis-Lagrange mixed variational formula for laminated composite struc- tures with a refined higher-order beam theory. Int. J. Non-Linear Mech. 32, 989-1001 (1997).

[21] Zenkour, A. M.: Vibration of axisymmetric shear deformable cross-play laminated cylindrical shells-a variational approach. Int. J. Engng Sci. 36, 219-231 (1998).

Simple and mixed shear deformation theories [ 9?'

[22] Zenkour, A. M.: A generalized mixed variational formula for the analysis of laminated plates. In: Smart materials, structures and MEMS, (Aatre, V. K., Varadan, V. K., Varadan, V. V. eds.), Pro- ceedings of SPIE 3321, pp. 698 709 (1998).

[23] Fares, M. E., Zenkour, A. M.: Mixed variational formula for the thermal bending of laminated plates. J. Thermal Stresses 22, 347 365 (1999).

[24] Zenkour, A. M., Fares, M. E.: Thermal bending analysis of composite laminated cylindrical shelIs using a refined first-order theory. J. Thermal Stresses 23, 505 - 526 (2000).

[25] Kantorovich, L. V., Krylov, V. I.: Approximate methods of higher analysis. Moscow: Fismatgiz, 1962.

[26] Timoshenko, S. P., Gere, J. M.: Theory of elastic stability, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1961. [27] Srinivas, S., Rao, A. K.: Bending, vibration and buckling of simply supported thick orthotropic

rectangular plates and laminates. Int. J. Solids Struct. 6, 1463-1481 (1970). [28] Reddy, J. N.: A refined nonlinear theory of plates with transverse shear deformation. Int J. Solids

Struct. 20, 881-896 (1984). [29] Librescu, L., Khdeir, A. A., Reddy, J. N.: Further results concerning the dynamic response of shear

deformable elastic orthotropic plates. ZAMM 70, 23 33 (1990). [30] Librescu, L., Khdeir, A. A., Reddy, J. N.: A comprehensive analysis of the state of stress of elastic

anisotropic flat plates using refined theories. Acta Mech. 70, 57 81 (1987).

Author's address: Dr. A. M. Zenkour, Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Education, Tanta Univer- sity, Kafr El-Sheikh, Egypt (E-mail: [email protected])


Recommended