Date post: | 13-May-2023 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | independent |
View: | 0 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Characterisation of the Chitosan/layered silicate nanocomposites
Catalina Natalia Cheaburu1, b, Cornelia Vasile 1, a, Donatella Duraccio2,c, Sossio Cimmino2,d
1Petru Poni Institute of Macromolecular Chemistry of the Romanian Academy, Aleea Grigore Ghica
Voda 41A, Iasi, Romania 2Instituto di Chimica e Tecnologia dei Polimeri (ICTP), Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR),
Via Campi Flegrei 34, 80078 Pozzuoli (NA). Italia [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Keywords: Chitosan, Montmorillonite, Nanocomposites, Intercalation Abstract Characterization of chitosan / layered silicate nanocomposites obtained by solution-mixing technique, having different compositions including treated and untreated montmorilonite (MMT) has been performed. The optimum amount of MMT and also the effect of nanoparticles type on nanocomposite properties by DSC, X-ray diffraction and TG measurements have been established. The chitosan chains were inserted into silicate layers to form the intercalated nanocomposites. The interlayer distance of the silicates in the nanocomposites enlarged as their amount increased. The stiffness and thermal stability enhanced.
Introduction
Polymer nanocomposites generally consist of nano-scale layered clay dispersed within the polymer matrix [1]. Due to the nanometer-size particles (obtained mainly by dispersion), nanocomposites at a certain amount of nanoparticles, nanocomposites exhibit distinctly improved mechanical, thermal, optical and physico-chemical properties when compared with the pure polymer or conventional (microscale) composites. Chitosan, a biocompatible, biodegradable, non-toxic linear polymer available by the deacetylation of chitin (the second abundant polysaccharide extracted from the shells of shrimps and crabs) was used to obtain nanostructured materials based on montmorillonite. One function of particular interest of chitosan is its broad antimicrobial activity [2] in conjunction with the excellent film forming ability [3] becoming in this way a very interesting polymer for applications like agriculture, medicine [4], environment [5], food [6], etc. In particular, the use of chitosan as films and edible coatings to extend shelf-life and preserve quality of fruits and vegetables has received considerable attention. [7, 8] The exfoliated nanocomposite offer more significant improvements in physical properties and the silicate layers are completely delaminated from each other and are well dispersed. [1] The thermal stability of the nanocomposites depends strongly on the compatibility of the components [9]
In our previous paper [10] by the mechanical properties determinations coupled with SEM examination of the chitosan/montmorilonite nanocomposites it has been established that by the incorporation of 5 wt% of nanoparticles, the stress of break and Young modulus increase in respect with those of chitosan, because of a fine dispersion of the MMT in the chitosan matrix.
This study deals with the more detailed characterization of the same chitosan / layered silicate nanocomposites with different compositions using treated and untreated montmorillonite (MMT). To establish an optimum amount of MMT and also the effect of nanoparticles on nanocomposite properties the chitosan / clay nanocomposites were characterized by means of differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), thermogravimetry (TG) and X-Ray diffraction.
Solid State Phenomena Vol. 151 (2009) pp 123-128online at http://www.scientific.net© (2009) Trans Tech Publications, SwitzerlandOnline available since 2009/Apr/16
All rights reserved. No part of contents of this paper may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without the written permission of thepublisher: Trans Tech Publications Ltd, Switzerland, www.ttp.net. (ID: 193.138.98.119-11/05/09,09:34:13)
Experimental
Details on the materials can be found in the previous paper [10]. The characteristics of other materials used in this study are; Cloisite 15A is a natural montmorillonite modified with a quaternary ammonium salt 2M2HT -dimethyl, dehydrogenated tallow, quaternary ammonium, Southern Clay Product Inc from Rockwood Additives Ltd. Cloisite 93A is a natural montmorillonite modified with a quaternary ammonium salt M2HT-methyl, dehydrogenated tallow ammonium, Southern Clay Product Inc from Rockwood Additives Ltd.
The thin film of the chitosan/ clay nanocomposites were obtained by casting on Petri dishes the viscous solutions of chitosan and clay dispersions and air dried by evaporation. Two series of samples have been investigated namely: (1) the nanocomposites containing variable content of clay from 1 to 15 wt% and (2) nanocomposites with a constant amount of 5 wt% of diferent types of nanoparticles. Investigation methods: DSC measurements were performed by using a Diamond Perkin Elmer instrument and the thermal program used was from 30°C to 130°C at 20°C/min; 130°C for two hours from 130 to -10°C at 50°C/min; kept at -10°C for 5 minutes from -10°C to 200°C at 10°C/min in order to remove the traces of solvent and to evidence better the glass transition. The WAXD measurements were carried out at room temperature with a Philips PW 3710 Wide Angle X-ray Diffraction (WAXD) (Cu-Ni radiation, λ= 0.154 Å). The distances between clay layers were calculated with Bragg’s law: 2d sin θ = nλ; where λ is the wavelength of the X-ray d is the interspacing distance and θ is the angle of incident radiation. TG/DTG analyses were performed by a Diamond Perkin Elmer (TGA/DTA) apparatus with a heating rate of 10°C/min in nitrogen atmosphere from 25 to 500°C.
Results and discussion
DSC results are presented in Fig. 1 and Table 1. Two transition temperatures have been detected in the temperature range studied (room temperature – 200°C) (Table 1) in 110- 125°C and 168- 173°C region. The first one is influenced by the Na+MMT nanocomposite content the peak temperature decreasing from 123 oC for pure chitosan to 113 oC at an amout of 5 wt% nanoparticle then progressively increases again to 125 oC for a content of 15 wt% Na+MMT. The peak temperature of the second DSC peak increases with both Na+MMT and C30B content up to 6 oC in respect with that of chitosan film. The data are in accordance with those obtained by DMTA [10], but the first temperature region is situated at high temperature in DSC curves because the heating rate used was higher (2°C/ min in DMTA and 20°C/ min in DSC). The first peak could be assigned to the water loss while the second to the decomposition of the components of the system, it being related to the thermal stability of nanocomposites. It can conclude that the incorporation of Na+MMT and C30B led to improved thermal stability of chitosan.
124 Nanocomposite Materials
100 120 140 160 180 200
CSflakes
CS-Na+MMT 15 wt%
CS-Na+MMT9 wt%
CS-Na+MMT 7 wt%CS-Na+MMT 5 wt%
CS-Na+MMT 3 wt%
CS-Na+MMT 1 wt%
First derivative
Temperature (°C)
CS film
100 120 140 160 180 200
First Derivative
Temperature (oC)
CS- C15A 5 wt%
CS- Na+MMT 5 wt%
CS- C93A 5 wt%
CS-C30B 5 wt%
CS film
CS flakes
Fig. 1: DSC thermograms for the nanocomposites based on chitosan with various amounts of clay; (a) and with a constant amount of clay (5 wt %) with different types (b) Table 1: The Tg values determined from the first derivative of DSC thermograms
From the first derivative of DSC thermograms From DMTA Sample First peak [°C] Second peak [°C] T2 [oC] T1 [oC]
CS film 123 168 51; 105 156 CS-flakes 125 - CS-Na+MMT 1 wt% 120 171 CS-Na+MMT 3 wt% 115 173 CS-Na+MMT 5 wt% 113 170 100 170 CS-Na+MMT 7 wt% 116 168 75 167 CS-Na+MMT 9 wt% 121 170 CS-Na+MMT 15 wt% 124 169 CS-C30B 3 wt% 124 174 CS-C30B 5 wt% 124 170 91.8 175 CS-C30B 7 wt% 124 172 84 168 CS-C93A 5 wt% 122 172 CS-C15A 5 wt% 124 171
X-Ray Patterns
0 10 20
Na+MMT
CS
CS-Na+MMT 1wt%
CS- Na+MMT 3 wt%
CS- Na+MMT 5 wt%
CS- Na+MMT 7 wt%
CS- Na+MMT15 wt%
4.96 o
4.83 o
4.83 o
4.93 o7.2o
2222θθθθ (deg)
Intensity (u.a.)
4.93 o
5 10 15
Intensity (u.a.)
C30B
CS
CS-C30B 3%
CS- C30B 5%
CS-C30B 7%
4.85 o
4.91o
4.8o
4.87 o
2θθθθ (deg)2 4 6 8 10
2θθθθ (deg)
3.45o
2.8 o
4.79 o
4.87 o
2.8 o
2 o
7.2 o
4.83 o
CSCS- Na+MMT 5 wt%
Na+MMT
CS-C15A 5 wt%
C15A
CS-C30B 5 wt%
C30B
CS-C93A 5 wt%
C93A
Intensity (u.a.)
Fig. 2: X-ray patterns of nanocomposites based on chitosan; nanocomposites with various amounts of clay, Na+MMT (a) and C30B (b), (c) nanocomposites with different clay type
(a) (b) (c)
(a) (b)
Solid State Phenomena Vol. 151 125
Because of the hydrophilic and cationic structure of chitosan in acidic medium, this biopolymer has a good miscibility with montmorillonite (especially with Na+MMT) and can easily intercalate into the interlayers by means of cationic exchange [11, 12] Fig. 2a shows the XRD patterns of Na+MMT, neat CS and its CS/Na+MMT nanocomposites with different Na+MMT amount. The XRD pattern of the MMT shows a reflection peak at about 2θ = 7.2o, corresponding to a basal spacing of 1.23 nm. The XRD pattern of CS shows the characteristic crystalline peaks at around 2θ ~ 10º, 20º and 25º- Figure 2a, according to literature data [13-14]. After montmorillonite incorporation within CS, the basal plane of Na+MMT at 2θ = 7.2º disappears, substituted by a new peak at around 2θ~ 4- 5º- Fig. 2a. The shift of the basal reflection of Na+MMT to lower angle indicates the formation of an intercalated nanostructure, while the peak broadening and intensity decrease most likely indicate the disordered intercalated or exfoliated structure.[9, 11, 15]
In the case of unmodified MMT the interspace distance (d001) was enlarged from 1.23 nm to 1.91 nm with the increasing of the clay amount indicating a good intercalation of chitosan into the layers of clay.
Fig. 2b shows the influence of the amount of clay content, particularly C30B, modified montmorillonite, on the interspace distance. In the Table 2 are summarized the obtained values for the nanocomposites based of chitosan and unmodified and modified clay. It can be observe that in the case of C30B there is no significant enlargement of the d001 which means that chitosan did not enter into the interlayers of C30B.
In the case of Cloisite 30B, organically modified Na+ MMT with a quaternary ammonium salt, the clay became organic and its hydrophobicity increased. It was very difficult to disperse Cloisite 30B in the chitosan aqueous solution and an intermolecular reaction to occur between clay and chitosan in spite of the presence of the hydroxyl group in the gallery of Cloisite 30 B. Table 2: The obtained values of 2θ angles and d-spacing of nanocomposites based chitosan with various amount of clay and different types of clay.
Sample 2θ [deg] d001 [nm] Sample 2θ [deg] d001 [nm] Na+MMT 7.20 1.23 CS-C30B 3 wt% 4.80 1.84 CS- Na+MMT 1 wt% 4.93 1.79 CS-C30B 5 wt% 4.87 1.81 CS- Na+MMT 3 wt% 4.83 1.82 CS-C30B 7wt% 4.91 1.8 CS- Na+MMT 5 wt% 4.83 1.82 C93A 3.45 2.56 CS- Na+MMT 7 wt% 4.93 1.79 CS- C93A 5 wt% 2.80 3.15 CS- Na+MMT 15 wt% 4.96 1.91 C15A 2.80 3.15 C30B 4.79 1.84 CS-C15A 5 wt% 2.00 4.41
It is seems that the strong polar interactions, especially hydrogen bonding, critically affected the formation of intercalation and exfoliated nanocomposites. [16] A shift of 2θ to smaller angles was also observed in the case of modified mineral clays C93A and C15A showing an enlargement of the interspace distance d001 from 2.56 to 3.15 nm for C 93A and from 3.15 to 4.41 nm for C 15A. The peak of nanocomposite CS- C93A in comparison with C93A, presented in Figure 2c, shows a rather broaden peak indicating a developement of an exfoliated structure. TG/DTG results are given in Fig. 3 and Table 3:
126 Nanocomposite Materials
100 200 300 400 500
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100W (%)
Temperature (°C)
CS film
CS-Na+MMT 1 wt%
CS-Na+MMT 15 wt%
CS-Na+MMT 3 wt%
CS flakes
CS-Na+MMT 5 wt%
CS-Na+MMT 7 wt%
CS-Na+MMT 9 wt%
100 200 300 400 500
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
W (%)
Temperature (°C)
CS-C15A 5 wt%CS flakes
CS-C93A 5 wt%
CS-Na+MMT 5 wt%
CS-C30B 5 wt%
CS film
100 200 300 400 500
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
W (%)
Temperature (°C)
CS film
CS flakes
CS-C30B 3 wt%
CS-C30B 5 wt%
CS-C30B 7 wt %
0 100 200 300 400 500
First Derivative
Temperature (oC)
CS flakes
CS film
CS- C30B 3 wt%
CS- C30B 5 wt%
CS- C30B 7 wt%
0 100 200 300 400 500
First Derivative
Temperature (oC)
CS-Na+MMT 1 wt%
CS-Na+MMT 3 wt%
CS-Na+MMT 5 wt%
CS-Na+MMT 7 wt%
CS-Na+MMT 9 wt%
CS-Na+MMT 15 wt%
CS film
CS flakes
0 100 200 300 400 500
First Derivative
Temperature (oC)
CS flakes
CS film
CS- C15A 5 wt%
CS- C93A 5 wt%
CS- C30B 5 wt%
CS- Na+MMT 5 wt%
Fig. 3: Thermogravimetric (TG) curves (above) and their derivative (DTG) (below) for nanocomposites based on chitosan with various amounts of clay, Na+MMT (a), (d) and C30B (b), (e) and nanocomposites with different clay type (c), (f). Table 3: TG data for nanocomposites based on chitosan with various amounts of clay and different clay types.
*Ti- onset temperature, Tm- temperature corresponding to the maximum rate of weight loss; Tf- final temperature; ∆W- weight loss
Ti increases with increasing Na+MMT content, in other cases decreases and ∆W decreases indicating an enhancement of the thermal stability by Na+MMT incorporation in chitosan.
Sample Ti* [oC] T*
m [oC] Tf* [oC] ∆W [%]
CS film 206 276 393 36.77 CS-flakes 197 302 438 48 CS-Na+MMT 1 wt% 183 261 409 41.42 CS-Na+MMT 3 wt% 209 265 402 38.75 CS-Na+MMT 5 wt% 205 281 387 36 CS-Na+MMT 7 wt% 210 271 388 35.52 CS-Na+MMT 9 wt% 210 277 382 32.54 CS-Na+MMT 15 wt% 214 275 386 36.45 CS-C30B 3 wt% 174 276 391 38.95 CS-C30B 5 wt% 171 277 406 37.76 CS-C30B 7 wt% 168 277 407 36.76 CS-C93A 5 wt% 170 273 407 39.23 CS-C15A 5 wt% 188 260 403 37.59
(a) (b) (c)
(e) (f) (g)
Solid State Phenomena Vol. 151 127
Conclusion
DSC and TG/DTG data evidenced an improvement of the thermal stability by Na+MMT incorporation in chitosan. It has been established on the basis of the X-rays diffraction results that the nonocomposites with Na+MMT, C15A and CS-C93A exhibit a disordered intercalated or exfoliated structure and a good intercalation of chitosan into the layers of clay. For the other nanocomposite it has been found that chitosan did not enter into the interlayers of C30B.
References
[1] T. J. Pinnavaia, G. W. Beall, Eds. Polymer-Clay Nanocomposites; John Wiley & Sons: Chichester, West Sussex, U.K. (2000)
[2] N. R. Sudarshan, D.G. Hoover, D. Knorr, Food Biotechnol. 6, p. 257 (1992)
[3] F.S. Kittur, K.R. Kumar, R.N. Tharanathan, Z. Lebensm.-Forsch. A 206, p. 44 (1998)
[4] J.A .Ko, H. J. Park, S. J. Hwang, J.B. Park, J.S. Lee, Int. J. Pharm. 249, p.165 (2002)
[5] L. Pietrelli, L. Xingrong, Annal. Chim. 94, p.389 (2004)
[6] E. Agullo, M.S. Rodrıguez, V. Ramos, L. Albertengo, Macromol. Biosci.3, p. 521 (2003)
[7] D.B. Worrell, C.M.S. Carrington, D.J. Huber, Postharvest Biol. Technol. 25, p. 33 (2002)
[8] F. Shahidi, J.K.V. Arachchi,Y.-J. Jeon, Trends Food Sci. Technol. 10, p. 37 (1999)
[9] E. Gunister , D. Pestreli , C. H. Unlu, O. Atici , N. Gungor, Carbohydr. Polym. 67, p. 358 (2007)
[10] C. N. Duncianu, C. Vasile, Proceedings of the Polymer Processing Society 24th Annual Meeting -PPS-24 - June 15-19, Salerno (Italy) (2008)
[11] S.F. Wang , L. Shen, Y.J. Tong, L. Chen, I.Y. Phang, P.Q. Lim, T.X. Liu, Polym. Degrad. Stab. 90, p.123 (2005)
[12] M. Darder, M. Colilla, E. Ruiz-Hitzky, Chem Mater 15, p. 3774 (2003)
[13] R. J. Samuels, J Polym Sci Polym Phys 19, p. 1081 (1981)
[14] K. Ogawa, T Yui, M. Miya Biosci Biothechnol Biochem 1992; 56, p.858
[15] K. H. Liu, T.Y. Liu, S.Y. Chen , D. M. Liu, Acta Biomaterialia, 4, p. 1038 (2008)
[16] Y. Xu, Xi Ren, M. A. Hanna, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 99, p.1684 (2006)
128 Nanocomposite Materials
Nanocomposite Materials doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.151 Characterisation of the Chitosan/Layered Silicate Nanocomposites doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.151.123
Solid State Phenomena Vol. 151 129