Date post: | 26-Jan-2023 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | khangminh22 |
View: | 0 times |
Download: | 0 times |
CONTINUOUS FERMENTATION OF GRAPE JUICE FOR THE
PRODUCTION OF FORTIFIED SWEET WINE
Thesis submitted for the Degree of
Master of Science
of
The University of New South Wales
by
Robert Leland Cootes, B.Ag. Sc. (Adelaide)
February 1977
DECLARATION
The candidate, Robert Leland Cootes, hereby declares
that none of the work presented in this thesis has
been submitted to any other University or
Institution for a higher degree.
Robert Leland Cootes
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
i i i
I wish to express my gratitude and appreciation to Dr T.H. Lee, Senior
Lecturer, School of Food Technology, and to Dr P.L. Rogers, Senior
Lecturer, School of Biological Technology (SBT), University of New South
Wales (UNSW) for their advice and guidance during the course of the
research work and on the preparation of this thesis.
I am also indebted to the Directors of S. Smith & Son Pty. Ltd. for
granting study leave and support, which enabled me to carry out this
work.
The assistance of Dr M. Dickson, Head, Biomedical Electron Microscope
Unit, University of New South Wales, Mr R. Doble, Professional Officer,
School of Biological Technology (SBT), Mr S. Preece, Photographer, School of
Chemical Engineering is also gratefully acknowledged.
For translations from Russian I am indebted to Mrs Frieda Guerman,
School of Food Technology, and from German, Tom Babij, School of
Biological Technology, UNSW.
I also wish to thank Mr J. Baker and his staff at S. Smith & Son Pty. Ltd.,
N.S.W. branch, and Chris Smitham for typing the final manuscript of this
thesis.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS iii
TABLE OF CONTENTS iv
SUMMARY v”
1.. INTRODUCTION ix
2. LITERATURE REVIEW 1
2.1 Production of Fortified Sweet Wines 1
2.2 Continuous Fermentation 3
2.21 Theory of Continuous Fermentation 3
2.22 Internal and External Recycle in Continuous Fermentation 7
2.23 Multistage Continuous Fermentation in the Wine Industry 8
2.24 Continuous Fermentation in the Wine Industry 18
2.3 Review of Wine Yeast for Wine Production 24
2.31 Important Characteristics of Yeast in Winemaking 24
2.311 Cytology of Yeast 26
2.312 Hybridization and Mutation in Yeast 28
2.313 Energy-yielding Mechanisms in Yeast 28
2.314 Inhibitors of Yeast and Lactobacilli 29
2.315 Yeast Viability 29
2.316 Selective and Differentiating Solid Media for Yeast 31
2.317 Effect of Vitamins on Yeast Activity 31
2.318 Factors Affecting the Rate of Wine Yeast Fermentations 32
2.3181 Ethanol Concentration 32
2.3182 Yeast Concentration 34
2.3183 pH and Temperature 34
2.3184 Yeast Species and Strain 35
2.3185 Agitation and Carbon Dioxide 36
2.3186 Sugars and Yield of Ethanol 36
2.32 Role of Oxygen and F’gvour Formation in Quality WineProduct^ 3g
V
2.33 Acid Metabolism and Some By-products of Fermentation 42
2.34 Control of Wild Yeast and Bacteria in Fermenting Musts 45
3. EQUIPMENT, MATERIALS AND METHODS 48
3.1 Continuous Fermentation Equipment 48
3.11 Fermentation Vessel 48
3.12 Mixing and Pumping Must 50
3.13 Temperature Control of Fermentation 50
3.14 Constant Parameters pH and Oxygen 52
3.2 Materials 54
3.21 Yeast 54
3.22 Grape Juice 55
3.23 Alcohol Fortification 55
3.3 Methods 57
3.31 Yeast Growth and Preparation of Inoculum 57
3.32 Preparation and Preservation of grape juice 58
3.33 Sterilization of Fermentation Vessel 59
3.34 Estimation of Dry Weight of Yeast 60
3.35 Estimation of Yeast Cell Concentration 60
3.36 Estimation of Total Soluble Solids of Fermenting Must 60
3.37 Estimation of Ethanol Concentration of Fermenting Must 61
3.38 Calculation for Fortification of Fermenting Must 63
3.39 Stabilization of New Wine 63
4. RESULTS 65
4.1 Preliminary Experiments in Continuous Fermentation of GrapeJuice for the Production of Fortified Sweet Wine 65
4.11 Removal of S0^ from Grape Juice 65
4.12 First Preliminary Continuous Fermentation Experiment 66
4.13 Second Preliminary Continuous Fermentation Experiment 67
4.2 Semi-continuous Grape Juice Addition to the Fermenter forthe Production of Fortified Sweet Wine 70
vi
4.3 Continuous Fermentation using Different Strains ofS. ceA2.v4Aajolq. 76
4.4 Control Procedures in Single-stage Continuous Fermentationof Grape Juice for the Production of Fortified Sweet Wine 86
5. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS 96
6. APPENDIX 102
6.1 Glossary 102
6.2 Symbols 103
6.3 Sample Calculation for Ethanol Production 104
6.4 Schematic Representation of Grape Juice preparation for aContinuous Fermenter 105
.6.5 Removal of Sulphur Dioxide from Grape Juice 106
6.6 Schematic Diagrams of Five Continuous Fermenters(Peynaud, 1967) 108
6.7 Derivation of Productivity Formula 109
6.71 Yeast Productivity 109
6.72 The Ethanol Productivity of the 1 Litre Fermenter 109
6.8 Biomass Determination for Yeast Strain 505 110
6.9 Preparation of Yeast for Electron Microscopy 111
6.10 Identification of Wild Yeast Types 111
6.11 Key to the Yeast Genera 113
6.12 Calculation of Correlation Coefficient 119
7. BIBLIOGRAPHY 120
Fortified sweet wine is made from grape juice in a 1 litre continuous
fermenter. Particular attention is paid to techniques which will be
suitable for commercial application.
The rationale for this study is discussed in the introduction, which
is followed by a review of multistage and single-stage continuous
fermenters in use in four major grape growing areas of the world.
In preliminary experiments the 1 litre laboratory fermenter is fitted
with continuous fortification equipment, and some fermentation control
variables are investigated. Yeast growth rates are between 0.028-0.093 lhr” , and fermenter productivity, as an index of fermentation rate,
is inhibited by high levels of SO^ and ethanol.
A comparison of continuous and semi-continuous grape juice addition
to the fermenter shows that additions of grape juice, twice daily,
do not lower the productivity of the fermenter significantly.
A 10-36% increase in ceil concentration is achieved with a flocculent
yeast strain in the fermenter, so that the specific cell count equilibrium
for a particular yeast strain can be maintained under semi-continuous
grape juice addition.
Five strains of SacchaAomyceA c-OJiAvlsiaa are compared in the 1 litre
fermenter, and wide variations in cell count, growth rate and sensory
quality are apparent.
viii
The fermenter productivity for each of the strains 729, 350, 522, B19
and 505 is 2.5, 1.2, 2.6, 2.7 and 3.4 g EtOH/l/hr respectively. Thirty
six wines have been made in the experiments where yeast strains are
compared, and all wines have been judged commercially acceptable.
The. ethanol concentration in the 1 litre fermenter can be controlled by
varying dilution rate and temperature. For example, a 5°C drop in
fermentation temperature reduces the fermenter productivity by 36%
for strain 729. Fermenter productivity increases 65% following a
change in dilution rate from 0.04 to 0.08 hr"\
Cell growth rate is significantly affected by cell concentration,
rapid temperature changes and ethanol inhibition. Yeast production of7
ethanol per cell per second is between i.4-25x10 molecules EtOH/cel1/sec
for a wide range of the above variables.
The wine making process is discussed in relation to the criterion of
optimum fermenter productivity which often may not be greatly manipulated
for a raw material, such as grape juice. The importance of choosing
economic and appropriate automatic, industrial control systems is also
discussed.
Details of experimental methods are presented and a bibliography of
164 references is listed; 22 figures and 19 tables are included.
ix
]. INTRuDUCTION
Economic and industrial labour considerations have initiated the
redesigning of an Australian wine cellar, which produces 50,000 hi of
fortified sweet wine annually. The cellar was built prior to 1935 and
has operated since then with only minor modifications. For the purpose
of this study, double this production is expected in five years without
a substantial increase in labour input or fermenting capacity. The
tanks that are to be installed to increase the storage capacity must
also be capable of fermenting grape must.
It appeared that some of these requirements could be satisfied by
fermenting grape must in a continuous system. The primary function of
a continuous fermenter is to establish a high yeast cell concentration
in large quantities of fresh must. This enables a higher rate of
fermentation, because the total number of substrate "action sites" is
increased. The production capacity, of the system is greater than
conventional batch fermenters, and therefore the capital outlay is less.
The system is also suited to automatic control, and requires less
operational labour. Furthermore it appeared feasible that good quality-,
fortified sweet wine could be made by continuous fermentation techniques.
The project was designed to provide temperature and dilution rate data
necessary for controlling yeast activity during the production of a
commercially acceptable fortified sweet wine. Similar criteria could
then be used to compare continuous and semi-continuous addition of grape
juice to the fermenter. The fermenter productivity (g EtOH/l/hr) was
to be measured in each experiment with the aim of determining which
yeast fermented grape juice most rapidly under experimental conditions.
X
No attempt was made to create experimental conditions which could not
be achieved or would not be encountered in a corrmercial winery.
Furthermore, no attempt was made to compare batch or continuous
fermentation techniques from a qualitative or economic point of view.
1.
2. LITERATURE REVIEW
*2.1 Production of Fortified Sweet Wines
Before 1967 more fortified wine was produced in Australia than table
wine, but since then the production of table wine has increased more
than threefold, while fortified wine has not shown the same dramatic
increase (Table 1). In 1975, however, the production of fortified
wine and wine for distillation was 1.85 x 106 hi or 52% of Australian
wine production.
Table 1. Australian wine production statistics (from the Australian
Wine Board annual report 1974-75).
Vintage Table wines (including sparkling)
Sherry, dessert and flavoured wines
Wine for Distillation
Total wine production
Average 1945-49 0.09
x 106 hi
0.46 0.69 1.24
Average 1950-54 0.13 0.53 0.75 1.41
Average 1955-59 0.19 0.42 0.70 1.31
Average 1960-64 0.28 0.45 0.83 1.56
Average 1965-69 0.54 0.51 0.86 1.91
1971 0.83 0.50 1.17 2.50
1973 1.18 0.54 0.94 2.66
1975 1.68 0.69 1.16 3.53
Grapes which mature to greater than 22° Brix without weight loss are
preferred for the production of fortified sweet wine. In Australia,
the majority of these grapes are grown in hot climates under irrigation
and include the following varieties:
Muscat Gordo Blanco (Muscat of Alexandria), Brown Muscat, White and Red
Frontignac, Pedro Ximenez, Palomino (Listan), Doradillo, Muscadelle
(incorrectly called Tokay) (Antcliffe, 1976), Sultana (Thompson Seedless),
2.
Semi lion, Grenache, Shiraz and Cabernet Sauvignon. The pH of the finished
wine should be less than 3.4; all of the above varieties can reach high
°Brix and acceptable pH values in good seasons in most grape growing regions
in Australia. Most of these areas, however, often have poor ripening
conditions except for microclimates similar to the Rutherglen and Glenrowan
districts in Victoria. The grapes grown in these districts consistently
achieve greater than 30° Brix without fungal spoilage. Poor quality grapes,
such as those that are rain damaged, low in sugar or badly infected with
downy mildew (Plasmopara sp.), are eventually diverted to wines for
distillation. Crushing and destemming is usually effected with Whitehill
(Garolla type) crushers having capacities up to 100 tonnes/hr. Sulphur
dioxide is always added at the crusher so that the must contains about
100 mg SO^/l. After the addition of 1-5% of yeast starter culture, the
free run juice and pomace are separated by a coarse filter or screen under
gravitation. The pomace can be fermented dry, and the pressings diverted to
wine for distillation to produce fortifying spirit. For the production of
fortified sweet wines, fortifying spirit that must be derived from the
distillation of fermented grape materials is added after fermentation has
lowered the hydrometer reading to about 14.5° Brix. Addition of neutral,
high ethanol spirit to a level of 20% ethanol by volume gives a new hydrometer
reading of about 7° Brix. The fermentation does not stop immediately, however,
and wines are usually reblended prior to preparation for sale, because sweet
cr brown sherries marketed in Australia generally range from 6° to 8° Brix
while liqueur rnuscats are as high as 11° Brix.
3.
2.2 Continuous Fermentation
2.21 Theory of Continuous Fermentation
The concept of continuous fermentation was documented by Semichon (1926),
but the original papers on the theory of continuous fermentation were
published by Monod (1950) and Novick and Szilard (1950 a,b).
Continuous fermentation has now gained wide acceptance as a research tool
and, to a lesser extent, as an industrial process. The most common form
of continuous fermentation vessel consists of a backmix reactor in which
the organism can be grown under the required conditions. Sterile growth
medium is fed continuously into the vessel, and fermented broth,
including the organism (culture), emerges from it at the same rate; the
volume of the vessel is kept constant by an overflow device. As with
all backmix reactors, perfect mixing is assumed, so the culture emerging
is homogeneous with the culture in the vessel and the growth medium
entering the vessel is instantly dispersed. One advantage of continuous
fermentation vs_ batch fermentation for the study of microbial populations
is that growth is occurring under steady state conditions. In batch
fermentation, the levels of substrates and the concentration of cells arid
end products are constantly changing throughout the growth cycle of the
cells. In a continuous fermentation system, however, growth rate and
cell and substrate concentrations can be controlled. Hence the organisms
grow at steady state in a controlled environment under the desired
experimental conditions.
Steady state refers to the culture as a v/hole and although each cell is
in a different stage of growth and metabolic activity, a large number of
cells in a homogeneous environment ensures that sugar uptake and carbon
dioxide and alcohol production remain constant.
4.
The basic theory of continuous fermentation has recently been reviewed
. by Fiechter (1973), Pirt (1975) and Aiba, Humphrey and Millis (1973) and
will be discussed briefly here. Full reviews on all aspects of continuous
fermentation, including its industrial applications, have been published
by Ricica (1973, 1974).
The ratio of the flow rate (F) into and out of the vessel to the volume
of the vessel (V) is defined as the dilution rate (D), which is the
inverse of the mean residence time (tr) of a particle in the vessel,
D = £ = 1 . The rate of washout of the organism from the vessel, if V tr
growth ceased but flow continued, is given by the equation
dx ~ - Dx dt
where x is the concentration of organisms in the vessel.
The growth of micro-organisms is described by the equation
dx = /jx dt
where /j is the specific growth rate of the organisms. Monod (1942)
determined a relationship between the specific growth rate and the
concentration of the essential growth substrate /j = /Jm (^—--)
where un is the maximum specific growth rate, s is the substrate
concentration and Ks is a saturation constant numerically equal to the
substrate concentration at which jj = h /%• For a culture growing in a
continuous fermentation vessel with all substrates in excess, except
a single organic substrate (such as glucose), we can write the following
mass balances,
dx = ;ux - Dx dt
dx = x Corn (tA-.)-D) (Vdt
where s is the concentration of the growth limiting substrate. A mass
balance for the growth limiting substrate can also be written,
5.
ds = D (s0 - s) - px (2)It Y
where sQ is the concentration of substrate in the incoming feed and Y
is the yield constant, defined as the weight of organism formed, divided
by the weight of substrate used over any finite period of growth. If
s0 and D are held constant and D is less than ,um, then values of x and
s exist such that the system is in steady state, ie.,
dx = ds = o (3)dt dt
These steady state values are calculated by solving equations (1) and (2),
x = Y(sq -s) = Y(sq-Ks)
From the mass balance of cells,
dx = jux-Dx "dt
it can be shown at steady state dx = o, that jj = D, ie., the growth rateeft
is equal to the dilution rate.
(4)
(5)
This provides the basis for chemostat control of continuous culture,
where the dilution rate and hence the growth rate is determined by the
addition of medium at a constant rate. The dilution rate must be less
than the maximum growth rate of the organism or washout will occur.
A second important type of control of continuous fermentation is
turbidostat control, in which the cell density of the culture is
monitored in an optical density cell and compared with a set point; as the
organism grows and exceeds the set point, the medium inflow increases
and dilutes the culture, reducing the optical density until the set point
is again reached.
In chemostat control then, the growth rate is fixed and x and s find their
steady state values (u<um due to substrate limitation), whereas with
turbidbstat control x is fixed and p and s find their steady state
values (ju = junl).
The third important type of control of continuous fermentation is product
inhibition of fermentation rate; in wine fermentations ethanol is the
principal product which causes non-competitive (with substrate) inhibition
of the growth of yeast. The growth rate of the organism,
where is the product inhibition constant and P is the product formed,
hence,
Both chemostat and product-!imited control models are applicable to wine
fermentations. In secondary fermentations for the production of sparkling
wine, yeasts with high alcohol tolerance are used and their growth rate
can be substrate limited in a single-stage backmix reactor. However,
in a fermentation for the production of fortified sweet wine growth rate
can be more closely modelled to the product limited system.
The theory of two-stage and multistage continuous fermentation in a product-
limited system has received little attention, and there are no kinetic
data available in the literature. In a chemostat, however, the model is
more simple; for a combination of two identical, homogeneously stirred
chemostats, where the outflow of stage 1, with a concentration of cells x^,
is connected to stage 2 with a concentration x^, the dilution rate no
longer represents the specific growth rate,
e.g., 02 > p?
7.
°2 = >'Z 5
and x2~xl> 1
Thus cell concentration in the first stage can never exceed that of the
latter stages. A multistage system also offers the opportunity to grow
cells in the presence of different amounts of substrate. For example,the
principal sugars in grape musts, glucose and fructose, each have
different rates of utilization by SacckaAomLfceA ctn.zvibicui, and in a
three-stage fermentation, Ough and Amerine (1968) observed a 5%
reduction in fermentation rate (g Et0H/100 ml/hr) between the first
and second stages, despite an increase in viable cell count, and a
further 35.8% in the third stage (Table 2).
A theoretical comparison between batch and continuous fermentation is
useful and the ratio
continuous output (chemostat) = In (y01) + — batch output 0
where x0 is the initial cell concentration, and xm is the maximum cell
concentration in a chemostat. If the time taken (ta) to sterilize and
fill a fermenter is zero, and the yield for a specific organism remains
unchanged, then continuous output = 2.3 batch output. The derivation
and a discussion of this equation is given by Aiba, Humphrey and Mill is
(1973) and Pirt (1975).
2.22 Intprnal and External Recycle in Continuous Fermentation
Pirt (1975) made a kinetic study of three methods of internal recycle
to increase the cell concentration in a fermentation vessel. Firstly,
a filter or screen may be placed over the culture outlet tube, such that
the liquor can pass through without obstruction from cells in the vessel.
8.
Secondly, an organism may be selected that will adhere to sedimentation
baffles in the vessel thus forming a heterogeneous mixture, and finally,
a tall, tower-like fermentation vessel may be used so that only the
bottom portion of the vessel is homogeneously mixed, and the top portion
has a lower concentration of cells due to gravitational settling. The
latter system is more effective if the organism flocculates strongly.
External recycle is achieved by mechanically separating the cells from
the liquor in a centrifuge or sedimentation tank, then pumping a portion
of the concentrated suspension of cells back into the fermentation vessel.
Both separation systems are potential, microbiological contamination
points, and this separation must occur before alcoholic fortification
or cell viability would be reduced. The wine is therefore vulnerable to
oxidation and aerobic spoilage by AceXobacXeA 4pp. and aerobic yeasts,
which would be present in the grape juice but unable to grow during
primary fermentation, because of a low oxidation-reduction potential.
Finally, the installation of an automatic centrifuge or sedimentation
tank is expensive, and the advantages must be carefully evaluated in
terms of improving the productivity of the system as a whole.
2.23 Multistage Continuous Fermentation in the Wine Industry
Multistage, continuous fermentation for the production of sparkling
wines was recommended by Russian scientists Brokhorov and Alekandrovskii
(1952), Kozenko (1953a,b) and Brusilovskii (1957). Further work on
these production techniques by Preobrazhenskii (1961, 1962), Giashvi1i
(1961), Koshev (1961) and Brusilovskii (1963 a,b) was reviewed by
Amerine (1959, 1963). In 1962 the United States of America (U S A)
Patent Office granted Patent No. 3,082,653, entitled "Method of
champagnizing wine in a continuous stream and installation for same",
to Gerasimovich, Merzhanian ari Srusilovskii. The method involved the
9.
continuous addition of base wine and yeast culture through six
hermetically sealed constant pressure tanks, with continuous liqueur
addition after fermentation. The fermenting wine, covered with a
layer of deodorized paraffin oil was held at 14°C initially,
gradually cooled to 9°C in the sixth tank and finally stored at -5°C.
The authors claimed that this process improved productivity without
loss of quality compared to batch fermentations.
Gilyadov (1968) compared continuous and semi-continuous grape juice
addition to a five compartment tower fermenter so that equivalent
dilution rates were achieved by dosing at 0, 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 hour
intervals. The cost of pump operation was reduced if impulse addition
was adopted, however, as the interval between impulses increased, and
the volume of each dose increased, the rate of fermentation was
reduced. Therefore an equation relating productivity of the installation
Qa, the output of the pump Qp, the number of impulses during 1 hour n
and the time required for each pumping t was tested,
t = Qa.60 ■ m Qp.n .
The equipment described achieved optimum productivity if the number of
impulses per hour n = 12, but no other variables were given. A three
stage system for the continuous fermentation of grape juice,
incorporating modern control equipment necessary for precise operation,
was investigated by Ough and Amerine (1968). The alcohol production
rate and viable yeast count data are shown in table 2. The yeast counts
are similar to those given by Giashvili and Alkanashvili (1971) from a
multistage system and ethanol production rates of 0.88 - 1.55 g EtOH/l/hr
given by Flanzy <Lt at. (1968) for a single-stage continuous
fermentation at 25°C.
Table 2. Alcohol production and live yeast cell concentration in the
three stages of a continuous fermentation system at 21 °C (Arnerine and
Ough, 1968).
Stage EtOH production (g/1/hr)
Viable yeast count (cells/ml x 106)
1 1.03 57.9
2 0.98 80.3
3 0.63 64.5
Martakov (1970) prolonged fermentation by adding fresh grape juice
continuously to fermenting must to maintain the must pool at 8 - 10% v/v
alcohol. Even though the must pool spread to further tanks, the complete
must pool was circulated through each of the vessels in the pool at
regular intervals. Fresh grape must, and theoretically the yeast,
remained actively fermenting for long periods:, consequently each cell
had a high alcohol productivity. The uptake of nitrogenous compounds
from the grape juice was 25-30% less than during conventional
fermentation. Similarly the total yeast biomass was 35% less due to
limited cell reproduction. The oxidation-reduction potential of the
must (E^) was found to be significantly lower and the level of
reductones significantly higher. Reductones were defined by Paul (1963)
as constituents of wine which have reducing properties with respect to
iodine. Martakov (1970) also claimed that the prolonged wine contact
with yeast increased the rate of aging and flavour development, and he
concluded that such prolonged fermentation with the continuous addition
of grape juice was necessary for a good quality wine.
The improved productivity of a multistage, continuous fermentation for
11.
the production of dry wine is reported by Laszlo (1969) and Giashvili
•and Alkanashvili (1971). Within a battery of 12 tanks Giashvili (1961)
made three arbitrary groups to explain varying yeast behaviour. In
the first section, I, there was an accumulation of yeast and 42% of
cells were budding, compared with a maximum of 16% budding in the
third section (III). Desulphitation also occurred in I, while in II,
there was less yeast growth, but higher ethanol productivity. For
example, in stage 1 the average ethanol produced per cell was 1.19 x 10^
molecules of EtOH/cell, and in stages 5 and 11 it was 1.8 and 0.1 x 10^
respectively (Appendix 6.3). However, the respective cell concentrations
in the example given are 38, 71 and 52 x 10° cells/ml, arid the author
gives no explanation for the disappearance of cells from stages 3, 4
and 5. The data presented showed a total acid increase of 0.5 g/1 bet
ween stages 1 and 5, which was consistent with the observations of
other workers, who have shown an increase in total acid and a corres
ponding decrease in pH in continuous compared to batch fermentation.
For the duration of the experiment, a total of 15 days, there were no
spoilage organisms reported; however, the author obviously had previous
experience with contaminants, since he stated that the increasing
ethanol concentration depressed contaminant activity so that it did not
influence the quality of the wine. A further observation was made in
that high alcohol and low conditions allowed the selection of yeasts
from successive generations that were more productive than their
parents, but no productivity data was presented to support this claim.
Finally section III contained the highest percentage of yeast in the
stationary phase and dead condition - supporting data was presented.
An extensive chemical and organoleptic analysis for 18 different
experiments was given, including SG, total acid, volatile acid, tartaric
acid, pH, total S02, invert sugar, glycerin, extract, ash, alkalinity,
12.
tannin, total N, P and Fe. The descriptive organoleptic evaluation
was generally favourable and contained some interesting remarks,
for example "reminiscent of European style wine", however, no score
statistics were presented.
Buryan oX at. (1973) presented data to support previous literature
claims that wines made by continuous fermentation under CO2 pressure
were low in E^, higher in reductones and contained less higher alcohols
than wine made by conventional methods. They first showed that
temperature and CO2 could be used to control the specific growth rate = In m? - In mi
F t2 - ti ' ’where mi is the biomass at the beginning and m2 the biomass at the end
of a time period t£ - t^. An over-pressure of 0.5 atmosphere of CO2
was found to limit cell viability, and the pressure was reduced to 0.1
atmosphere for a period of 1 - 2 hr. A reduction in temperature from
25 to 20°C required a pressure decrease to 0.2 atmosphere to achieve a
constant fermentation rate, and continuous stirring improved the
fermentation rate by 150%. The optimum conditions chosen for industrial-1application were a dilution rate of 0.065 hr , continuous stirring at
25°C and incoming grape juice, which had been adjusted to 17% soluble
solids, containing 60 mg/1 free SO2. The CO^ over-pressure chosen at
the Anapa (SSSR) installation was not stated clearly, but the
conclusions drawn from industrial experimentation were that in a
battery of six fermentation tanks in series, the wine produced after
six months aging was better than wine made by the usual method.
Organoleptic evaluation showed an improvement of 3-5% in scoring for, c <( ere
the new wine, although no duplicate data was given. No data was presented
supporting the claim that wine made by the new method contained a lower
concentration of higher alcohols. However, the improved wine quality
13.
was attributed to a lower E^ and higher reductone level, which
, protected the wines from oxidation.
Equipment for continuous fermentation of dry wines (Kovalevsky,
Anoshin and Orehanov, 1973) consisted of eight fermentation tanks
connected in series and surmounted by a horizontal trough which
contained a double archimedian screw; the trough was 24m long and
held marc, but allowed liquid to pass through a perforated screen
into a receival tray. By means of CO2 pressure from fermentation,
fermenting must was intermittently irrigated over grape skins in
the double screw chamber and collected in hermetically sealed fer
mentation tanks below. The mechanical characteristics of the system
were given in detail, but no data was presented on the quality of
wine produced or in fact if the system was used commercially.
Filippov and Dzhurikyants (1974) discussed a projected apparatus for
the continuous manufacture of champagne, which was installed in 1973
at Odessa's factory, with a projected output of 2.5 x 10^ dozen
bottles or 1,87 x 10^ hi/yr. The apparatus contained between 50 and
60 vessels of varying capacity for storage, stabilization and
continuous control of secondary fermentation; the residence time
for a.quantity of wine was from 3-12 months. A fish glue and
bentonite were used in a jet reactor to increase the reaction efficiency
of agglutination of proteins before continuous sedimentation,
centrifugation and filtration into an enzyme reactor, however, no
specific components were mentioned. Avakiants and Belousova (1965)
reported that in continuous fermentations adequate B - fructofuranosidase
was available for sucrose inversion. Half of the wine was sterile
filtered before liqueuring and yeasting, and the other half was
pasteurized by heating to 60°C, bolding for 48 hr, then cooling to
14.
10 - 15°C, before liqueuring and yeasting. After fermentation the
,wine was stored at 15 - 25°C for 3-12 months then subjected to
heat treatment in a heat exchanger between 40-60°C under 1.6
atmosphere pressure, cooled to -5°C and mixed with an expedition
liqueur before bottling. Dzhurikyjants dt at. (1974) discussed the
detrimental effect of high boiling point (HBP) alcohols on the
quality of champagne made in a series of six vessels. They claimed
that autolysis of yeast in the sixth vessel improved quality and
after the disappearance of sugar, amino acids are the main substrate
for HBP alcohol metabolism; no suggestions were offered to show
how these two supposedly simultaneous effects on wine quality could
be separated.
The use of multistage, continuous fermentation under a flor yeast for
the production of sherry was described by Dzhanpoladyan dt at. (1974).
The conventional method consisted of three vessels two thirds full of
wine at 16% ethanol (v/v), and each six months one third of the wine
was removed from each vessel and replaced by fresh wine or wine from
the proceeding vessel. The final stage, having a larger capacity,
allowed a residence time of up to ten years for any particular wine.
A continuous manufacturing process was then described in which the
first five vessels contained wine under a flor film, and the last two
contained wine on an autolyzed bed of yeast. Table 3 contains some
of the duplicate data comparing the batch method, the continuous flow
method under flor yeast and the continuous flow under flor with
incubation on autolyzed yeast.
Table 3. Chemical and organoleptic evaluation of flor sherry
(Dzhanpoladyan zt at., 1974).
TA* (9/1)
V A*(g/i)
A1dehydes (mg/1)
Esters (mg/1)
Wine yield(i)
Organolepticscore
Batch 3.8 0.53 486 152 3.3 8.4
Continuous 3.6 0.36 574 132 12.5 8.3
Continuous with autolyzation
3.5 0.34 677 166 14.5 8.5
*VA = volatile acidity, TA = titratable acidity
The flow rate of sherry through the continuous system was increased to
give a residence time of two weeks, before the quality fell below that
of the wine produced by the batch system. A further improvement to the
system was claimed by circulating the autolyzate and base wine through
a jet reactor for 20-180 min. This homogenization procedure increased
the acetal content by 40 mg/1 and esters by 13 mg/1 in 20 min, and if
the process was continued for 80 min, the organoleptic ratings improved
by 6%. During prolonged treatment of this kind for three hr, the pH
dropped from 3.7 to 3.54 and the E^ increased from 230 to 310 mV, but
no explanations were given.
Arnerine (1958) and Ough and Amerine (1958) have made semi-continuous
fermentation runs of up to two months with submerged flor cultures.
The system was a true continuous fermentation, though automatic control
of pH and redox potential was not attempted. The experiments on the
submerged culture of a flor-type yeast S. bztlcus employed various
combinations of temperature, rate of gas flow, pressure and agitation;
16.
aldehyde contents of up to 1,000 mg/1 were reported. Acetic and malic
acids, glycerine and alcohol were shown to be carbon sources for the
growth of the yeast. Stirring the fermenter for 25 seconds each hour
and maintaining an air flow of 0.1 litres/min through it gave excellent
yeast growth, and the aldehyde content of the product was maintained
at greater than 500 mg/1. This process was more successful, however,
when conducted on a semi-continuous basis by removing one tenth of
the contents daily. The aldehyde build-up over the period of the
experiment was at least twice as fast as that achieved in the batch
process.
Steinkraus (1972) achieved a rapid fermentation using a flor sherry
yeast, Saccha/iumijcdb ovZ^omu> strain 31, in a column constructed for4
continuous production. Under these conditions the yeast produced 10
molecules of acetaldehyde/cell/sec on a 10% ethanol wine substrate.3 7Although rates of acetaldehyde production that range from 10 to 10
molecules/cell/sec have been observed, the rates are sufficiently
stable for any given set of conditions to permit application of the rates
to the design and manufacture of continuous sherry fermenters (Steinkraus,
1972).
Brusilovskii, Gagarin and Sarishvili (1974) described a new apparatus
for the continuous secondary fermentation of wine for sparkling wine
production which involved a single, cylindrical vessel with concentric,
cylindrical partitions so that each annulus contained the same volume.
The same apparatus was the subject of USA Patent 3,916,775
(Merzhanian oX at., 1975). The vessel was jacketed with a coolant so
that the temperature of fermentation gradually decreased as the wine
moved from the centre to the outside of the vessel through each of seven
17.
cylinders, entering from the top then bottom consecutively. The
«system reduced the quantity of fermenting must remaining in
stationary pockets due to imperfect mixing, compared to that often
encountered in the more conventional series of connected pressure tanks.
The apparatus was also more compact, used comparatively less floor
space, and was more easily maintained and cleaned because there were
fewer pipes and valves. Data was presented to show that there was no
significant difference between the sparkling wine made by conventional
techniques and the new method for sugar, alcohol, E^, reductones,
aldehydes, SO2, VA, total acid total N and HDP algchols, however,
diacetyl was 50% lower in wine from the new apparatus. A three-fold
increase in the ratio of vessel surface area to wine was the main
reason advanced for the significant increase in the fermentation rate
in the cylindrical vessel. There was, however, no sensory evaluation
data given on the sparkling wine produced in this new pilot plant
compared to the conventional method.
Oreshkina at aX. (1974) discussed different techniques used in the
continuors production of tank-fermented champagne and presented data
comparing grape varieties and their contribution to total and amino
acid nitrogen in the resulting wines. The importance of low E^ and
the exclusion of oxygen was emphasized. It appears that high levels
of iron were a problem in some wines and detrimentally affected the
aerobic oxidation potential of the wine. Eight fermentation vessels
in series were recommended, and in the last two tanks wine passed
through ring shaped caps made of polyethylene to retain the yeasts
by adhesion. The wine was thereby enriched with yeast autolyzate,
and this was claimed to improve the flavour of the wine. Classical
and modern methods of sparkling wine production in Czechoslovakia
18.
have been summarized by Drobny (1976), and he indicated that the
, most recent innovation has been the single cylindrical vessel, with
several annular chambers, for the continuous production of both dry
and sweet (6% sugar) sparkling wines. For diabetics, sugar is
replaced with saccharin and sorbitol, and some low alcohol wines with
an added musk flavour are popular. Statistics are provided showing
that the per capita consumption of sparkling wine in Czechoslovakia
has increased from 0.036 in 1955 to 0.36 in 1975. In Australia in
1975 the per capita consumption of champagne and sparkling wine was
1.76.
2.24 Continuous Fermentation in the Wine Industry
The continuous fermentation process for grape juice has been used on a
commercial scale at Vie-Del Grape Products Company since 1949. This
operation was probably based on the Semichon (1926) 1Superquatre' concept,
which had aspects of a continuous fermentation, but contamination was
a serious problem as no methods were available to control the sterility
of the medium. The work showed that by starting the fermentation at
4% ethanol, undesirable microbial activity was virtually eliminated.
Riddell and Nuri (1958) reported that the product made by this process at
Vie-Del was uniformly good in quality, and the turnover time of the
fermenting room had been approximately doubled by changing over to the
continuous fermentation system. Toth and Tengerdy (1952), in a study
of the use of continuous fermentation for wine production, showed that
introduction of the must at a high sugar content and large draw offs
from the initial tanks, gave the highest rate of fermentation and yieldd
of ethanol. They also recommened removing 30% of the fermenter volume
in a batch-wise step each day. If smaller daily additions of grape
juice were made, yeast viability and fermentation rate were significantly
reduced.
19.
Cremaschi (1951) holds a USA Patent on a continuous fermentation
' process, which has been used extensively in Argentina for the
production of red wines. The fermentation tank contained a column of
grape must in progressively advanced stages of fermentation from
bottom to top of the column; skins and pulp from the crushed grapes
floated at the top of the column and seeds fell to the bottom. Crushed
grapes were fed into the bottom portion of the tank and subjected to the
fermenting conditions in the tank. The fermented cap of grape skins and
pulp were withdrawn from the top of the tank by an archimedean screw,
while wine was withdrawn from the uppermost portion of the column of
liquid and grape seeds and other solid matter were drawn from the bottom
of the tank. The process is commendable for its simplicity, however
the possibility that stratification occurred within the column was not
discussed.
Vlillig (1950) described how the above process operated in a winery in
Argentina. The fermenter capacity was 4,545 hi and consisted of a
cylindrical tower with a conical bottom. The tower was 9 m high,
7.3 m diameter and was made of reinforced concrete. At the top of the
unit were circular plows for removing skins. It was reported that an
improved product was being produced with less labour and in less space.
The single fermenter described replaced 30 small open vats that were
used in the batch process. In order to process half a tonne of grapes
the continuous system required 10 hi of fermenter space compared to the
36.3 hi required by the batch method. In the production of red wine,
it was claimed that growth of micro-organisms on the skins was
inhibited as they rose into the zone with the highest alcohol content;
thus, alcohol-tolerant yeasts underwent healthy, uniform fermentation,
and less SO^ was required.
20.
No data was presented to support these claims nor was there any
,indication of the alcohol level required to inhibit undesirable micro
organisms.
Between 1950 and 1962 little information was published on continuous
fermentation for wine production, however, Amerine (1959) reviewed
several continuous fermentation systems including application to yeast
production (Maxon, 1955; Wiley, 1954; Beesch and Skull, 1956), to
brewing (Wellhoener, 1954; Dunn, 1955), and finally the problems of
automatic control of continuous fermenters (Field and Dunn, 1957;
Denison eX at. , 1958).
A continuous fermenter for making dry red wine has been described by
Ladousse (1962) which saved 45% of the fermenting room space. The
fermenter has been widely used in Europe and is now made in Argeliers
by Societe des ateliers Pujol (Appendix 6.6). The main fermenter consists
of two concentric vessels standing on a common base. The central
vessel is used for regulating temperature and for must removal, as it
is connected to the outer chamber by a perforated screen. The outer
vessel contains seeds at its base, and at the top dry, fermented skins
are removed by an archimedian screw. The vessels have been built with
between 5-150 tonne capacities and are fitted with in-place cooling
jackets. The depth of the cap can be adjusted by recycling fermenting
must over the cap or diverting it into new tanks, hence the residence
time of the marc cap can be controlled. In addition to the saving of
space and lower operating costs, an improvement in quality is claimed
due to the more rapid onset of fermentation by the cultured yeast, and
an earlier onset of the malo-lactic fermentation, which limits infection
by spoilage bacteria. An increase of 0.2% alcohol v/v was claimed as
a result of a lower yeast biomass and the elimination of the lag phase
21.
observed at the commencement of batch fermentation; furthermore the
volume of press wine extracted from the marc was reduced.
Tarantola and Gandini (1966) suggested that fermentation systems such
as the Cremaschi or the Defranceschi (Italy) were really "superquatre"
systems (Semichon, 1926), in that fresh must was introduced into a
dilute alcohol must, which was unfavourable to the growth of Ptclita 4pp.
and Kio&alizfia. 4pp. The fermentation was thus carried on mainly by
S. aoJitvt&iaa, with less frequent isolations of S. ttaLicu4, 5. ovtfiofimt4,
S. ahzvaJU..znt and S. bayanuA.
Guetov (1969) made comparisons between the regular fermentation
procedures for red wine and continuous fermentation. The composition
of the wines, the temperature of fermentation, and the sensory quality
of the wines were not found to be significantly different.
According to Re my (1967) only small quantities of SO^ should be added
to the grape juice prior to entering the continuous fermenter, because
the strong reducing conditions may lead to sulphide formation. Buryan
at. (1973) recommended a high level of 60 mg/1 of free SO^ in the
grape juice prior to continuous fermentation, but made no reference to
sulphide formation. Such a discrepancy may be explained by the use of
different yeasts, some of which are capable of producing sulphides from
sulphite (Wainwright, 1971). Flanzy oX at. (1966) pointed out that the
addition of sulphur dioxide causes the accumulation of acetaldehyde and
decreases the rate of alcoholic fermentation in a continuous fermenter -
this is similar to batch data (Weeks, 1969).
A combined report on continuous fermentation of red grapes in France
22.
described the performance of a number of Ladousse-, Vico- and Padovan-
type fermenters and one Defraceschi unit (Anon., 1970). The units
varied from 800 to 4,000 hi capacity, and fermentations were more rapid
than batch in each of the units. The alcohol concentrations in the
fermenter were from 6 -■ 8%. The wine, maintained at 50 mg/1 SO^, was
monitored for microbial growth, but no significant bacterial contamination
occurred and 85% of the yeasts were S. ceAdvZAZaa. Fermentations at
pH 3.3 resulted in wines with the highest sensory qualities. The main
advantages of the systems described were a reduction in fermentation
time and labour, since the centralization of the operation required
only one technician to operate the equipment. Some taste preference
was shown for wines made in the conventional way, but Brugirard,
Roques and Vignier (1970) considered that their products, derived from
the controlled temperature, continuous fermentation of red grapes,
were superior to those made conventionally.
Peynaud and Guimberteau (1969) observed that good quality table wines
could be made by continuous fermentation; the process benefited by the
choice of a suitable strain of SacchaAomyceA yeast, the rational use of
SO^ and the control of fermentation temperature. A lower level of
methanol resulted from the continuous process, and small increases of
about V/o in total ethanol content were measured. Further reports on
continuous fermenters, including some previously mentioned, and those
of Gelencser and Sarkany (1970) and Bajenov (1969) have been reviewed
by Amerine and Ough (1972) without any new information being presented.
Barre and Combe (1975) described a laboratory scale, single-stage
continuous fermenter, for the production of wine with automatic control
23.
of specific gravity of the fermenting must. Sterile filtered grape
* juice may have been used in the 1 litre fermenter, but this was not clearly
stated. The fermenting must was continuously stirred and the temperature
of fermentation was controlled at 25, 30 and 35°C during the experiment.
The limited data presented showed that a constant sugar concentration
was maintained by changing the dilution rate, despite changes in
temperature and cell viability. No fermenter productivity data or
sensory evaluation of the wines were given. The fermentation was run
continuously for nearly a month without microbial contamination, and at
each temperature, a steady state was achieved and maintained. The
authors emphasized the importance of direct, on-line determination of
sugar or ethanol concentrations in continuous fermentation and then
control by varying the dilution rate. The current method used for
controlling fermentation rate in batch fermentations is by temperature
variation. There is a time lag in fermentation rate response to
temperature variation, and control of dilution rate for regulating
fermentation rate during continuous fermentation is superior to
temperature control for mainti/aning a constant fermentation rate in
batch fermentation. An on-line computer (Rogers, 1976) would be
necessary to estimate the temperature variation required to prevent
over-shooting a set point fermentation rate in a batch fermentation.
Information, such as temperature of must, volume of must, yeast cell
concentration and heat transfer capacity of a particular heat exchanger,
would be necessary for the computer to accurately determine the desired
temperature variation. The necessity for this complicated control
mechanism is essential because of the dynamic nature of yeast activity
in batch fermentation (Fig. 1).
24.
Fig. 1. Changes in yeast and ethanol (E) concentration during batch
fermentation. The rate of fermentation d E_ , is given by the slope ofdt
the ethanol (E) curve. (Reed and Peppier, 1973).
Although continuous fermenters have been used for the production of
wine for several decades, the elucidation of their control has resulted
in a renewed assessment of their use in industry. Ough and Amerine
(1968) stated that continuous fermentation was highly suitable for the
production of dessert wines, and in 1974 Dr A.C. Rice, the director
of research at the Taylor Wine Company Inc., Hammondsport, New York,
predicted an increase in continuous fermentation installations in the
immediate future for still and sparkling wine production.
2.3 Review of Wine Yeast for Wine Production
2.31 Important Characteristics of Yeast in Winemaking
The term 'wine yeast' will be used for species of SacdiaAormjceA, such as
S. ccAeucAf-ae, S. boJxcuA and S. ov^iofimU, which may be grown in pure
culture and added to musts. The term 'wild yeast' will describe yeasts
that occur naturally on grapes and can be found on winery equipment,
and includes all yeasts that may cause instability and off-flavours in
wine or musts. The mycology of yeasts described by Lodder (1970) will
be followed; for example, Giashvili and Alkanashvili (1971) and
Buryan, Kozlovsky and Razuvaev (1975) have used 5. uTrT incorrectly,
25.
and these yeasts will be referred to as S. cdsiav-Usiaz. Flor yeasts
‘ have been variously designated S. beJxcuA and 5. bayarnu (previously
S. chQAQA.Yii>AJ>)./
The yeasts of the SacckaAomycej, genus are strong fermenters and are
usually spheroid, ovoid, ellipsoidal or elongated. They propogate a/
vegetatively by multilateral budding and under suitable conditions can
produce 18-20% ethanol by volume (v/v). Other species of Sacc.kaAonr\yc&>
that produce high concentrations of ethanol are S. ckdvciLieAsL,
S. ovi&osunts, S. acA..dl&acA,e,ns, S. bayavnus and S. battens. Yeast
species that occur frequently in musts include S. hosqa. and S. uva/ium
(previously S. casit&bzHQQ,YiSAJ>). S. kouxLL and 5. moJUJj, are osmophilic
yeasts, which occur occasionally as spoilage organisms in sweet wines.
The cells of Fidvia are short ellipsoid to cylindrical in shape and
propagate by multilateral budding. Fidila mzmbsiandiacie.nA, with a
ceil size of (2.5 - 4.5) x (5-14)/j, occurs in almost all musts; it
does not produce more than 1-2% ethanol, but it readily survives higher
alcohol concentrations and grows readily on the surface of young wines,
where it forms a continuous film.
Yeasts of the genus Hans mala are spherical, ovoid or cylindrical in
shape and propogate by multilateral budding. Hansenula anomala is the
species of particular interest in winemaking, since it may produce up
to 10% ethanol (v/v) and large amounts of ethyl acetate and other
esters.
The fissian yeasts SdUzosacdioAomycaA reproduce vegetatively by
forming a wall across the middle of the elongated cells.
26,
'i The yeasts do not pdroduce high concentrations of ethanol, but
SdvLzoAacck. pombd, cell size (3-5) x (6-16)ju, ferments malic acid4
to ethanol and CO^ (Reed and Peppier, 1973).
KloackeAa are small cells, (2-4.5) x(5-8)/j, pointed, oval or lemon
shaped, which occur abundantly in musts and can dominate the early
phase of natural fermentations to 5-6% ethanol; they can also form
large amounts of volatile acids and esters.
Further discussion on the role of Sacc.haAomtjcodeA, Candida and
To/iulop6i6 species in grape musts is provided by Reed and Peppier (1973).
2.311 Cytology of Yeast
The principal microstructures of a yeast cell are the cell wall,
plasma membrane (plasmalemma or cytoplasmic membrane), nucleus, one
or more vacuoles, mitochondria, polyphosphate granules (volutin),
lipid globules, ribosomes and ground plasma or matrix. The ultra
structure of yeast cell walls includes a dense net work of microfibrils
or fibrillar mat, a birth scar and numerous bud scars (Streiblova, 1968).
The wall content of S. aojiavdAiaa varies from 6-27% of the cell dry
weight and increases within that range as cells pass from the logarithmic
growth phase to the stationary phase. Upon aging, flocculent yeasts
almost double their wall weight (Mill, 1966; Griffin and MacWilliam,
1969), and they bind twice as much calcium as walls from non-flocculent
strains (Lyons and Hough, 1970). The gross chemical content of the
yeast cell wall is 83% carbohydrate, 10% protein, 3% lipid, 0.45%
sterol, 0.3% ribonucleic acid and 0.04% deoxyribonucleic acid
(Nurminen, Oura and Suomalainen, 1970); some of the components
characterized include glucan, mannan, chitin (1%), glucosanine,
27.
fatty acids, glycerides, phospholipids (0.7%) and phosphate (1%).
.Certain environmental conditions modify cell wall composition, for
example, cells grown in the absence of inosital have weaker cell walls,
contain less mannan, protein and phosphorus, but more glucan and
glucosamine than normal cells (Power and Challinor, 1969). The
ability of the yeast cells to survive freeze-drying is unaffected by
cell wall composition, but pretreatment of the cell with 2-mercaptoethanol
greatly increases the proportion of survivors (Richards and Elliot, 1968).
The appearance of elongated cells during continuous fermentation has
been well documented (Hough and Button, 1972). 5. ceAeuXif.ae cells
show little tendency to elongate in batch fermentations, but elongate
during continuous fermentation under stress situations such as high
pressure or nitrogen limitation. It was also noted that the balance
of thiol and disulphide groupings was modified by adding either sodium
thioglycollate or sodium selenate to the medium. These additions had
the effect of causing elongated cells to bud ovoid ones, even under
conditions of nitrogen limitation. It was also demonstrated that the
mitochondria of ovoid and elongated cells differed in protein-
disulphide reductase activity. McMurrough and Rose (1967) have studied
the composition and structure of cell walls from yeast grown in
continuous culture at different rates and showed that total glucan and
mannan contents of the walls were not greatly affected, however, at
low growth rates the phosphorus and protein content of the wall
increased. It was suggested that with elongated cells grown in a
nitrogen-limiting medium the shape arises from low protein disulphide-
reductase activity and differences in the cell wall composition, both
of which lead to fairly rigid areas of cell wall.
28.
2.312 Hybridization and Mutation in Yeast *
• Although hybridization has the potential for improving yeast for
technological uses, only a few studies have been reported (Kleyn and
Hough, 1971). Wine yeast hybrids of high pectolytic activity and
improved fermentation rate were isolated by Mosiashvili and
Shalutashvi1i (1971). Hybrids of bakers yeast with increased maltase
activity and superior dough performance were mentioned in patents
granted to Burrows and Fowell (1964); after testing 2,000 hybrids,
Lodder and Loggers (1962) found two high-maltase strains which out
performed conventional bakers yeast. Johnston and Lewis (1976)
record an excellent summary of the techniques used in genetic analysis
of S cqazvi^icLd.
Natural mutations occur in yeast populations, for example, abnormal
cells lacking respiratory ability were observed to be 1% of the yeast
cell population (Ephrussi, 1953), but no mutants of brewers yeast have
proved suitable for commercial use (Reed and Peppier, 1973). A
combination of direct selection pressure and continuous culture was
used to select for altered acid phosphatase activity in S. ceAeufLsffie
(Clarke, 1976), and after 400 generations a mutant was obtained.
Results of this nature indicate that selection by continuous culture
is of limited application and is most likely to select regulating
mutants - mutants with gene amplification and altered enzyme
complements (Wiame and Dubois, 1976).
2.313 Energy-Yielding Mechanisms in Yeast
Yeasts are heterotrophic, facultative anaerobes, which grow in the
absence of air or in the presence of molecular oxygen; the presence
of oxygen induces the change in energy-yielding metabolism from
29.
fermentation to respiration (Pasteur effect, reviewed by Sols,
Gancedo and DelaFuente, 1970). Fermentation is the anaerobic,
energy-releasing transformation of glucose to pyruvic acid in a
series of metabolic, coupled reactions known as the Embden-Meyerhof-
Parnas pathway. Yeast growth per unit of substrate is 5-10 times
more efficient in air than anaerobically, but the cell uses glucose
at a higher rate in fermentation, than by respiration. Glucose
concentration in excess of 5% in the presence of oxygen represses
respiration and allows fermentation (Crabtree Effect).
2.314 Inhibitors of Yeast and Lactobacilli
Diethyl pyrocarbonate (DEPC) is an effective inhibitor of wine yeast
alcohol dehydrogenase at concentrations between 50-100 mg/1
(Reed and Peppier 1973); wild yeasts usually have a lower tolerance,
however, 100-300 mg/1 DEPC is necessary to kill 1actobaci11i and
other bacteria participating in malo-lactic fermentation (Reed and
Peppier, 1973). Sulphur dioxide inhibits yeast growth, but wine
yeasts for use as starter cultures can be fermented in the presence of
200 mg/1 in order to acclimatize them to the microbiocide (Reed and
Peppier, 1973).
2.315 Yeast Viability
Direct cell counts, after staining with equal volumes of yeast and
suspensions of 0.01% methylene blue or 0.2% Congo red, show that stained
cells by either dye are dead (Gleinster, 1973; Suomalainen, Oura and
Nevalainen, 1965). Similarly the ratio of live and dead cells can be
estimated by fluorescent staining with Clayton yellow and acriflavine
hydrochloride and examination under ultraviolet light (Mi 11ipore, 1969).
Live yeasts fluoresce tfith a bright yellow-orange colour, and dead cells
30.
fluoresce faintly with a greenish colour. Kunkee (1976) described
* a similar method using a polychromatic fluorochrome, euchrysine
2 GNX to stain cells under transmitted ultraviolet light, so that
viable cells fluoresce green, and dead cells fluoresce orange.
Yeast cell viability in continuous fermentation is significantly
affected by temperature, ethanol concentration, dissolved oxygen
tension (DOT) and available nitrogen. Some studies of viability
in continuous fermenters have been reviewed by Hough and Buttonr
(1972) - cell concentrations of 50-60x10 /ml have been reported
(Ough and Amerine, 1968; Giashvili and A1kanashvi1i, 1971; Barre and
Combe, 1975). Reduced yeast viability was found by Portno (1968a),
when high concentrations of yeast were maintained by external recycle.
Similarly Nagodawithana, Castellano and Steinkraus (1974) found that
the higher the temperature between 15-30°C, the greater the rate of7
death as initial cell inocula were increased from 1.1x10 tog
7.8 x 10 cells/ml, however, no explanation was given except that
nutrients and oxygen were apparently not limiting. Better retention
of cell viability was obtained as DOT approached 100% at 15°C, but
fermentation rate was lowered above a DOT of 13%. Intracellular
levels of 5 x 10 ^ ethanol molecules/cell were considered normal by
Nagodawithana and Steinkraus (1976), with higher concentrations such
as 2 x 10^ molecules ethanol/cell being accompanied by inactivation
of alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) and loss of cell viability. Kunkee and
Singh (1975) found that ADH activity was higher in cell-free extracts
of S. c,QA<L\)jj>ia<i (Montrachet Strain, UCD 522) grown aerobically
compared to that from the yeast grown anaerobically. The use of oxygen
to improve cell viability in continuous fermentation has been
successful (Ricketts and Hough, 1961), but Portno (1968b) found that
with high concentrations of yeas-' fhe amount of dissolved oxygen had
31.
little effect on beer production and yeast growth. The detrimental
• effect of aeration of musts during the fermentation of grape juice
was recognized by Flanzy at at. (1966) who found that aeration was
not necessary to maintain a sufficient yeast concentration in a
continuous fermentation experiment that ran for 40 days. Similarly,
Cowland and Maule (1966) were able to maintain S. coAaviAtaa in
steady state for prolonged periods in a continuous fermenter in the
absence of oxygen.
2.316 Selective and Differentiating Solid Media for Yeast
Since yeasts can develop over a wide range of pH, yeast media is
adjusted to pH3.5-4 with lactic acid or hydrochloric acid just before
its distribution to plates or tubes (Reed and Peppier, 1973). No
single medium has been devised for detecting wild yeasts. Wine yeasts
are unable to grow on lysine agar, and this media is generally used
for wild yeast detection; however, S. duutattciJA, a cornnon wild
yeast, does not grow on lysine agar. This yeast may be detected on
the fuchsin - sulphite medium of Brenner at at. (1970), the crystal
violet agar of Kato (1967) or Lin's medium (Lin, 1975). The most
sensitive test for wild yeast contaminants in brewers wort is the
immunofluorescent technique described by Richards (1970).
2*317 Effect of Vitamins on Yeast Activity
Amerine and Ough (1972) in reviewing experiments by Oprya (1969)
stated that the reduction in vitamin content of wine was several times
greater in continuous fermentation compared to batch fermentation; they
postulated that this was due to extra yeast growth. Their conclusion
has been difficult to substantiate from other literature, and it is
apparent that the reverse could be true. Reed and Peppier (1973) showr
that in batch fermentation the maximum cell count is 140-150x10° cells/ml
(Fig.1) and Ough and Amerine (1968) found a maximum of BOxlO6 viable
cells/ml (Table 4) in their continuous fermentations. Oprya (1969)
in fact reported that within some vitamin groups, namely the B
vitamins, there was a 50-70% reduction during continuous fermentation
compared to the level of these vitamins in grape juice. The uptake of
vitamins was maximum between tanks 2 and 4 in a seven tank series; ther
maximum cell count in those tanks was 112 x 10 cells ml. Oprya (1969)
also observed a relationship between the changes in the vitamin and
mineral contents of grape juice and the application of mineral fertilizer
to grape vines. He achieved a doubling of the pantothenic acid and
thiamine levels in wine fermented continuously from grapes grown
under fertilizer supplements. The concentration of vitamins in the
wine was claimed to be reduced by 50-75% with high levels of must SO^,
however, no data were given to support these observations.
2.318 Factors Affecting the Rate of Wine Yeast Fermentations
The following variables are important in influencing the rate of
fermentation: ethanol concentration, pH, temperature, CO^ pressure,
yeast species, Brix of the must and the presence of yeast nutrients
and inhibitors. In addition to the individual effect of each variable,
there are important interactions between variables. For instance, the
inhibiting effect of ethanol on fermentation rate is temperature
dependent, and secondly during a batch fermentation, Brix, ethanol
and viable cell concentrations change markedly. Therefore accurate
information on the effect of each variable on fermentation rate can
only be determined under steady state conditions.
2.3181 Ethanol Concentration
Holzberg, Finn and Steinkraus (1967) found that in a continuous
fermentation system at 21°C a yeast count of 20x10^ cells/ml produced
33.
1.3 g ethanol (EtOH)/l/hr. Ough and Amerine (1968) also worked with
a three stage, continuous fermentation system at 21°C, which produced
less alcohol per litre of fermenting must as the ethanol concentration
increased in successive stages (Table 4).
Table 4. The rate of ethanol production at different ethanol
concentrations in a three-stage continuous fermentation system at
steady state (Ough and Amerine, 1968).
Stage Fermentation rate(g EtOH/l/hr)
Av. ethanol cone.{%) v/v
Viable yeast count (cells/ml x 106)
1 1.03 7.1 57.9
2 0.98 8.8 80.3
3 0.63 11.8 64.3
Table 4 indicates that alcohol production may be independent of small
changes in yeast cell concentration. Nagodawithana oX at. (1974)
observed that the rate of ethanol production per cell gradually de
creased as the ethanol increased to 12% v/v. At steady state the fer
mentation rate of a continuous fermenter (g EtOH/1/hr) depends on the
ethanol produced per cell (EtOH/cell/sec), cell count and the dilution
rate. The dilution rate is dependent on the specific growth rate of
yeasts, hence the inhibiting effect of ethanol on growth rate must be
considered in this context. Buryan zt at. (1975) found that the
specific growth rate of yeast under anaerobic conditions decreased
from 0.2-0 hr~^ in a linear manner as ethanol concentration increased
from 0-10%. However, tolerance to ethanol is superior in older cells
(Ough, 1966b), and the death rate of cells is important in considering
growth rate for determination of dilution rate in a continuous fermenter.
34.
An intracellular level of about 5x10^^ EtOH molecules/cell is normal
in rapid fermentations (Nagodawithana and Steinkraus 1976) and this
level does not damage cell viability or ADH activity. However, higher,11intracellular ethanol concentrations of 2 x 10 molecules EtOH/cell
are accompanied by inactivation of ADH and loss of cell viability.
2.3182 Yeast Concentration
In laboratory studies Watson and Hough (1966) demonstrated that over
a wide range of yeast concentrations, the rate of fermentation in
wort for each yeast cell remained constant. Similarly, Steinkraus
(1972) found that within an order of magnitude the rate of 10'7 molecules
EtOH/cell/sec was relatively constant in continuous fermentation of9
grape juice with varying cell counts, including high counts of 10"r
cells/ml. At high cell counts above 80 x 10 cells/ml, however,
fermentation rate decreases as cell viability and growth rate decreases
(Nagodawithana at., 1974). Similarly the rate at which individual
cells grow in continuous fermentation of wort diminishes as the yeast
count increases (Watson and Hough, 1966); no cell concentrations
were given in this study. This yeast count effect is modified by
the concentration of CO^, the agitation rate and the intracellular ethanol
concentration, thus the growth limitation at high cell counts is related
to the excretion and uptake of nutrients, which is controlled by the
selectively permeable, plasma membrane, surrounding the protoplast
(Suomalainen and Oura, 1970).
2-3183 pH and Temperature
The natural pH of grape juice in Australian musts varies between 3.1
and 4.2, and it is well established that fermentation rate is faster
at higher pH values (Fig.2).
35.
Fig.2. Effect of pH on fermentation rate (Reed and Peppier, 1973,
, P 187).
0.1 0.15 0.2
Fermentation rate (°Brix/hr)
Yeast growth rates are also higher at pH 4.0 than at pH 3.0 and batch
fermentation begins earlier at higher pH levels (Ough, 1966 a,b).
The relationship between temperature and fermentation rate is linear
for batch fermentations between 10 - 32°C (Ough, 1964). The effect
of temperature upon continuous fermentation is more complex and has
received little study. Hough and Button (1972) showed that an increase
in temperature between 15-30°C led to a linear increase in beer
production rate in a fully stirred tank. Above 20°C, however, the
increase in yeast growth rate was no longer linear. This effect is
consistent with previous discussion in that, at higher temperatures,
growth rate will be limited by solute and nutrient transport through
the yeast cell wall, but fermentation rate responds to the temperature
change.
2.3184 Yeast Species and Strain
There appears to have been no study comparing the effect of wine yeast
strains on fermentation rate in continuous fermentation, and only yeast
36.
species have been referred to in the literature regarding production
rates in batch fermentations. In beer production, however, Hough and
Button (1972) claimed that strains of S. coAdvL^Zao. that flocculate
and sediment easily accumulate in the fermenter and therefore give the
highest rates of ethanol production.
2.3185 Agitation and Carbon Dioxide
Rice and Helbert (1974) confirmed previous reports in the literature
that agitation significantly increases yeast growth. They concluded
that gently agitated fermentations, either by normal evolution of carbon
dioxide or mechanical means, were supersaturated with CO^ and that the
level of dissolved CO^ was the major factor that affected yeast growth
rate at different levels of agitation. Kunkee and Ough (1966) reported
that carbon dioxide inhibited yeast growth, although only fermentations
under several atmoshperes of pressure showed conclusively that such
inhibition existed. Rice and Helbert (1974) observed that an increase
of one volume of dissolved CO^ reduced growth rate by 28%, and that it
was not pressure per se which caused the decreased yeast growth in
batch fermentations.
2.3186 Sugars and Yield of Ethanol
The following sugars have been isolated and identified in the fruit cf
l;xXc6 vlni&QAa vines; stachyose, raffinose, melibiose, maltose, sucrose,
galactose, glucose and fructose (Amerine and Joslyn, 1970). The two
most important sugars are d-glucose and d-fructose, in approximately
equal amounts at maturity; the remaining sugars together account for
less than 0.5% by weight of the grape must. Fructose is considerably
sweeter than glucose, and most wine yeasts ferment glucose faster than
fructose, hence in a two-stage continuous fermenter a higher ethanol
37.
production rate would be expected in stage one, where glucose whould
be preferentially fermented (Ough and Amerine, 1968).
Pasteur assumed that 48.6g ethanol were evolved from 100 g of glucose,
and actual yields of ethanol in wine fermentations have been close to
this figure (Reed and Peppier, 1973). Several reports describe attempts
to determine alcohol yields from a fermentation, however, estimates of
sugar concentration have been based on total soluble solids or °Brix,
and there have been some ethanol losses due to entrainment with CO^.
In addition, small amounts of ethanol may be obtained from glucosides.
Warkentin and Nury (1963) compared actual ethanol losses in closed
fermenters with losses calculated from physicochemical data and found
good agreement. At 27°C, 0.83% of ethanol was lost by entrainment,
and at 35°C the loss was about twice as great. Ough and Amerine (1968)
found ar overall yield of 48.4% in a three-stage continuous fermentation,
with 44.9% in the first stage, 49.1% in the second and third stages.
An increase of 1% v/v and 0.2% v/v ethanol was reported by Amerine and
Ough (1972) and by Ladousse (1962) respectively in continuous fermenters
compared to batch fermenters for the production of red wine. High
ethanol yields in continuous fermenters have been associated with low
biomass yields and a moreJcomplete fermentation of residual sugars.
Little work has been attempted to explain these industrial observations,
however, fermentation mechanisms have been elucidated by Horecker (1963)
for the reduction of pentoses to yeast metabolisable products. The low
oxidation-reduction potential of must in continuous fermentation is
suitable for the reductive pathways of anaerobic pentose metabolism.
The important pentoses are D-xylose and L-arabinose in polysaccharides
and D-ribose and 2 deoxy-D-ribose in nucleic acids; the end products
of their metabolism are x-ketoglutaric acid, pyruvic acid and L-anabitol.
38.
The activities of the enzymes in relation to the rate of metabolism
• in the glycolytic and pentose phosphate pathways have been discussed
recently by Oura (1976).
2.32 Role of Oxygen and Flavour Formation in Quality Wine Production
Alcoholic felamentation is effected best in the absence of air
(Amerine and Joslyn, 1970) for several reasons. Firstly, fermentative
enzymes secreted by yeast require no oxygen for their activity, and
secondly aeration increases active respiration of sugar by yeasts
and leads to a greater loss of ethanol by evaporation or CO,-,
entrainment. In batch fermentations, however, in order to bring
forward the onset of fermentation, aeration is desirable to promote
the multiplication and vigour of the yeast; generally the oxygen
dissolved in the grape juice after crushing is sufficient to provide
this stimulus to yeast growth. Unfortunately, aeration of grape
juice or fermenting must can detrimentally affect the flavour
precursors and by-products of fermentation. Continuous fermentation
of grape juice provides an opportunity for complete anaerobic
fermentation, since there is no lag period before the onset of
fermentation.
Aeration can be responsible for discolouration, haze formation, loss
of desirable flavour and the presence of undesirable flavours (Amerine
and Joslyn, 1970; Ribereau-Gayon, 1975). Aeration of musts increases
the content of fusel oil acetic acid and acetaldehyde and promotes the
oxidation of catechins by polyphenoloxidase to o-quinones and their
condensation to melanins. Acetaldehyde, a normal by-product of
alcoholic fermentation, may also be formed by enzymatic or aerobic
oxidation of ethanol and conversely, acetaldehyde may be reduced to
ethanol, a reaction which is catalyzed by alcohol dehydrogenase.
Under anaerobic conditions the accumulation of acetaldehyde parallels
the formation of ethanol (Amerine and Ough, 1964) in the early stages
of fermentation and disappears during the latter stages. The
presence of oxygen limits the disappearance of acetaldehyde in the
latter stages of fermentation (Ribereau-Gayon, Peynaud and Lafon, 1956),
and further oxidizes ethanol to acetaldehyde. Acetic acid is formed
by the dismutation (oxidation of one molecule of acetaldehyde to
acetic acid and the simultaneous reduction of another to ethanol) of
acetaldehyde (Joslyn and Dunn, 1938) and by several species of kdatobcioJivi
that oxidize ethanol to acetic acid. Similarly,ethyl acetate is formed
by aerobic yeasts, which oxidise ethanol (Amerine and Joslyn, 1970).
Acetoin (acetyl methylcarbinol) is a normal by-product of yeast
fermentation and can be aerobically oxidized to diacetyl (Amerine and
Ough, 1972), although the bacterial production of diacetyl is more
common as a result of the malolactic fermentation (Rankine, Fornachon
and Bridson, 1969). Higher alcohols are formed by reductive decarboxylation
and transamination of amino acids and also by bacterial fermentation
of carbohydrates. These reactions are quite complex and have been
reviewed by Amerine and Joslyn (1970).
Both enzymic and non-enzymic browning in wines are directly related
to the flavonoid concentration (Peri nt al., 1971); a progressiver
insolubilisation of tannic flavoids and a polymenisation of the non-
tannic flavonoids accompanies the browning reaction. The rate of
browning, however, is apparently controlled by other factors, such as
enzyme concentration, pH, transport phenomena and suspended solids
(White and Ough, 1973). Enzymic oxidase activity is irreversibly
40.
induced by oxygen after grape juice is exposed to air (Lerner, Mayer
and Hare!, 1972).
The reaction mechanisms of grape catechol oxidase activity have been
further elucidated by Lerner and Mayer (1976), Traverso-Rueda and
Singleton (1973) and Ribereau-Gayon (1975).
Paronetto (1966) distinguishes between direct oxidation by oxygen and
enzymic and catalytic oxidation, however, from the data presented
previously, oxygen can induce some enzymic and catalytic oxidation.
Molecular oxygen is a terminal electron acceptor in oxidation processes,
and in the absence of oxygen these are accomplished by some other inorganic
substance, such as a metal ion, nitrate or sulphate (Sols oXal., 1970).
Conversely, the main reducing constituents in musts are yeasts, tannins,
anthocyanins and sulphurous acids (Amerine and Joslyn, 1970), which
together characterize the oxidation-reduction potential of musts and
wines. Paronetto (1966) has presented some data (Table 5) that shows
the relation between oxidation-reduction potential and dissolved oxygen
at different stages in the fermentation of non-sulphited and sulphited
red grape musts.
The oxidation-reduction potential of a must rises rapidly immediately
after crushing and falls again during fermentation (Amerine and Joslyn,
1970). No direct correlation between oxidation-reduction potential in
musts and wine quality was found by Deibner (1957), however, for young
wines a lower potential appeared related to higher quality; during
wine aging the potential varied considerably, and Deibner concluded
that the entire history of a wine must be followed to establish any
correlation between oxidation-reduction potential (E^ ) and sensory quality.
41.
Table 5. The relation between dissolved oxygen and the oxidation
reduction potential in red grape must, with and without sulphite
added (Paronetto, 1966).
Nonsulphited
Time on skins 1 3 6 12
Oxidation-reduction potential (volts) 0.390 0.416 0.436 0.455
Oxygen (mg/1) 3.3 5.2 6.3 7.3
Sulphited
Oxidation-reduction potential (volts) 0.346 0.356 0.376 0.386
Oxygen (mg/1) 0.7 1.0 1.3 1.5
The level of polyphenolic compounds is important in determining the
of wine, and these compounds can be oxidized at high or relatively low
potentials. Thus it is apparent that oxidation-reduction in wine is
complicated and depends on several variables (Ribereau-Gayon, 1963).
The E^ in must fermented continuously was found to be lower than in
batch fermentations (Martakov, 1970; Dzhurikyants oA at., 1974), and
since E^ corresponds to NADH concentration in the yeast cell (Amerine
and Ough, 1972), it is reasonable to assume that higher ethanol
production per cell in continuous fermentation contributes to the change
in E^ noted in the literature.
2.33 Acid Metabolism and Some By-products of Fermentation
Peynaud (1939) reported the formation of acetic, citric;lactic and
succinic acids by 5. during alcoholic fermentation, and
malic and tartaric acid production was demonstrated by Drawert,
Rapp and Ulrich (1965a,b). Although there is some evidence
(Sandegren and Enebo, 1961) that continuous fermentation shows a
greater accumulation of non-volatile acids and hence lower pH than
batch fermentation, this change is not always apparent in the finished
wine. The pH of wine was found by Wejnar (1968) to be regulated by
the tartaric acid content, particularly the ratio of tartaric acid
to potassium content and tartaric acid to the alkalinity of the ash.
Since the alkalinity of the ash is a measure of the potassium acid
bitartrate content, it appeared that the buffer capacity of a wine
was determined largely by the relative concentration of the acid salt.
In addition to these factors, the pH of a wine may be increased by the
secondary bacterial fermentation of malic acid, which according to
Ladousse (1962) is more rapidly induced in a continuous fermenter
under a cap of red grape skins. A detailed review, with 145 references,
of organic acid metabolism of yeasts during fermentation of alcoholic
beverages has been presented by Whiting (1975).
Sandegren and Enebo (1961) found that, compared to batch fermentation,
beer produced by continuous fermentation showed increased levels of
higher alcohols (fusel oil) and sulphydryl compounds. Unfortunately
no comparative data exists for wine made continuously, however, some
observations in this respect can be made. Higher alcohols are by
products in yeast metabolism of amino and organic acids; some enhance
and others detract from wine quality, depending on their concentration.
Amerine and Joslyn (1970) have shown that higher alcohols increase
43.
throughout fermentation, and Rankine (1967) found considerable
variation between yeasts. Peynaud and Guimberteau (1962) generally
found a greater level of higher alcohols in wines fermented under
anaerobic conditions which may explain the relatively higher levels
of higher alcohols reported in continuous fermentations (Dzhurikyants
eX al., 1974).
It is interesting to note that within the multitude of flavour
compounds recently separated and identified by gas chromotography and
mass spectrometry, the amount of ethyl octoate produced by yeast
during fermentation has been associated with wine quality (du Plessis,
1975), and both grape composition and wine yeast strain affect the
formation of ethyl octoate (Kunkee and Amerine, 1970).
The formation of H^S by wine yeasts has been widely reported in the
literature (Reed and Peppier, 1973; Kunkee and Amerine, 1970), but
the precursors and conditions necessary differ and are sometimes
contradictory. Studies by Wildenradt and Lewis (1969), Anderson and
Howard (1973) and Wainwright (1971) show that in brewers wort, yeast
strain, temperature, metal ions aeration and affect H^S formation
by yeast through the reduction of sulphate, sulphite, sulphur containing
amino acids and peptides. Both methionine and pantothenate decrease
the reduction of sulphate to sulphide, but both also have other effects
on sulphur metabolism. Methionine does not act directly on the
reduction of sulphite to sulphide so it does not always inhibit
sulphide formation, and added methionine can increase the amount of
sulphide formed (Wainwright, 1971). The ATP required for the reduction
of sulphate is supplied by fermentation processes (Dott, Heinzel and
Truper, 1976) and may also coincide with vigorous yeast growth
44.
(Wildenradt and Lewis, 1969; Wainwright, 1971). Thoukis and Stern
* (1962) claim that slow, cold aerobic fermentations encourage the
formation of H^S, however, Reed and Peppier (1973) state that H^S
formation is greatest when the E^ is at a minimum. Eschenbruch and
Bonish (1976) suggest that unknown factors contribute to the control
and regulation of the sulphate reducing systems, the ultimate aim of
which is the sufficient supply of sulphur containing components for
yeast metabolism. They found that some strains of S. ceAzvZAlaa
doubled sulphite production if the initial pH of the medium was
changed from 3.0 to 5.0, while other sulphite producing strains were
not affected. Minarik and Navara (1974) claim that S0^ levels of the
must have no significant effect on sulphate uptake or sulphite
formation, and that SO^-forming yeasts form less sulphide than normal
(non-SO^ forming) yeasts. In comparison Eschenbruch, Haasbroek and
Villiers (1973) found that SO^-forming yeast strains formed H^S fromr35 iboth sulphate and sulphite in experiments using labelled [ SJ sulphate
and sulphite in grape must. The addition of methionine and cysteine
completely suppressed sulphite and sulphide formation from sulphate,
while the formation of sulphide from sulphite was not influenced by
these amino acids, and only some strains were affected by the addition
of sulphite to the must. Further elucidation of the mechanism of
sulphite formation has been discussed by Heinzel and Truper (1976).
They isolated ATP-sulfurylase from two strains of wine yeast and
demonstrated feedback inhibition by adenylsulfate. Although Sandegren
and Enebo (1961) claim that continuous fermentation of brewers wort
showed an increased potential for the formation of sulphydryl compounds,
this is unlikely to be a useful generalization, since yeast strains can
be selected (Rankine, 1963) which are low producers of or do not produce
H^S in particular musts.
45.
The importance of establishing which yeast strains can produce H^S
in grape juice fermentation has been well recognized, and Mueller
(1976) compared five UCD strains of 5. ccAov/LsTae: 51 (Burgundy),
505 (Champagne), 522 (Montrachet), 505 and 586 (Australian strains)
and found that UCD 585 produced the highest level of H^S and UCD 51
the lowest.
2.34 Control of Wild Yeast and Bacteria in Fermenting Musts
Hough and Button (1972) have discussed the likelihood of serious
bacterial and wild yeast infection in a continuous fermenter and
suggested that the nature and number of the wild organisms, and the
part of the plant where infection took pi ace,were the most important
factors. Within the fermenter the wild organisms must be present in
large numbers, or have a considerable biological advantage over the
wine yeast, or if the growth rate of the wild organisms and the
accumulated cells introduced with the grape juice are less than the
dilution rate then washout will occur. Grape juice, stored before
addition to the fermenter, must be protected with microbiocides and
kept as close as possible to 0°C to prevent growth of the wild
organisms. Liquid SO^ added directly to grape juice inhibits the
growth of wild organismsbut the effectiveness of SCU, depends on the
quality of the grapes used. Amerine and Joslyn (1970) recommended that
75 mg/1 SO^ should be added to acid or immature grapes, 112 mg/1 to
mature grapes and 270 mg/1 to over-ripe grapes, which are usually
low in acidity and often mouldy. At pH values between 3 and 3.8,S02
remains dissociated in the SO^” and HSO^" forms (free S0^) and has
then a strong germicidal effect, but as the HS0g~ ion combines with
aldehydes, polysaccharides and organic acids (bound SO^its germicidal
effect is diminished.
46.
The addition of 50-100 mg/1 S0^ inhibits wild yeast, but the sensitivity
' of individual species varies widely, for instance, S. luduoigii and
S. bailii can tolerate high concentrations of SO^, while Kloeakzm
apicuZata and Pidiia membAane.iacie.il6 are sensitive (Reed and Peppier,
1973). In general SO^ inhibits wild bacteria in musts, and although
bound SO2 does not inhibit iacZobaciZluA planiaAum, it does inhibit the
heterofermentative species L. Hil.gaA.ciil and L&uconoAtac meAenteAcZcU.
Furthermore, Fornachon (1963) found that the presence of actively
metobolising yeast cells could be an important factor in encouraging
certain bacteria in any wine containing SO^, as the continuous
production of aldehyde by yeast could prevent the liberation of free
SO^ by bacteria, normally attacking aldehydes bound to SO^. Extensive
reviews of wild yeast and bacteria important in winemaking and their
tolerance to microbiocides have been recently published (Amerine and
Kunkee, 1968; Amerine and Ooslyn, 1970; Amerine at aZ., 1972). Pure
yeast starter cultures can be acclimatized to levels of SO^ between
50-200 mg/1, so that in sound musts of low pH, they have a considerable
advantage over wild organisms. The original Semichon (1926) principle,
that continuously fermenting must, containing over 4% v/v ethanol was
protected from contamination may have been true in 1926, but this has
not been substantiated recently, possibly because some strains of wild
organisms more resistant to 4% v/v ethanol have evolved. Sapis-Domercq
(1969) has provided a comparison of microflora of batch and continuous
fermentations, however, this information is only relevant in the
viticultural region of origin.
There is no single procedure adequate to prevent contaminant growth in
a continuous fermenter, but the aim in controlling their growth is to
47.
place them at a biological disadvantage in the fermenting must, withi
low pH, high alcohol and high microbiocide levels.
Protected microenvironments in grape juice supply lines, valves, stirrer
shaft bearings and imperfect weld joints are potential and often
persistent contamination points. These areas are not effectively
penetrated by chemical microbiocides and must be live steamed regularly
to prevent residual contaminant populations. The most persistent and
microbiocide resistant spoilage organisms are found in storage tanks
and equipment in wineries rather than on grapes before crushing, hence,
winery hygiene is a critical factor in controlling infection by
contaminants.
\
48.
3• EQUIPMENT, MATERIALS AND METHODS
3.1 Continuous Fermentation Equipment
The fermenter was based on the five socket Quickfit adapter MAF 3/52
and the Vibromix El Mixer (Model No. 3405 Edwards Laboratories Pty Ltd,
Smithfield, NSW). The fermentation vessel was a modified, Quickfit wide-
neck, culture vessel, and the assembly, shown in figure 3 was built by
the School of Biological Technology (SBT), University of New South Wales
(UNSW). Special modifications designed by the author for these
experiments include the fortification tube and spirit pump assembly,
the foam escape tube, Brix hydrometer vessel, the coolant reservoir
and pump assembly and the vessel for monitoring dissolved oxygen level
in the grape juice.
3.11 Fermentation Vessel
The fermentation vessel had a working volume of 900 ml, which could be
adjusted by shifting the position of the outlet tube for the partially
fermented must. The five socket adapter MAF 3/52 or lid of the fermenter
v/as attached to the vessel by a flange and clamp assemply. The flange
was washed and smeared with silicone grease, then clamped tightly prior
to sterilization. Steam for sterilization, must and yeast culture were
introduced through the fermenter lid by coarse bore, glass tube pipettes.
The outlet for the partially fermented must was fitted with a foam
escape tube to prevent must hold-up in the fermenter. The foaming
problem was due to two factors - firstly, the wine outlet tube v/as
small and secondly, the partially fermented wine contained 9-12%
soluble solids which produced a foam with high surface tension.
49.
ml $, a >**■*.««teff.fr'.-,:
pt.
f H t $$
m " - sw- ■ '■-■i.-Uiw; ■l-.e- --. „. • - •. ,•; .
PHUH
Fig. 3. Continuous fermentation equipment for the production of
fortified sweet wine in the laboratory. A,1 litre fermentation
vessel; B, five socket Quickfit fermenter lid; C, variable speed
must pump; D, fermenting must mixer; E, Brix hydrometer vessel;
F, fermentation control panel; G, coolant reservoir; H, variable
speed coolant pump; I, wine receiver; J, fortifying spirit pump.
50.
The foam escape tube prevented the blocking of the outlet tube for
' the partially fermented must. A Quickfit condenser type CX6/22 and
a Mackley filter (Microflow Ltd, Hampshire, U.K.) were connected to
the effluent gas outlet.
3.12 Mixing and Pumping Must
The Vibromix El assembly had an air inlet tube in the centre of the
mixer shaft, which was sealed in the lid of the fermenter by a
neoprene diaphragm. The stirrer plate had conical, pierced indentations
which pointed upwards and allowed the yeast culture to be sparged with
air, if high yeast cell concentrations were required. The stirrer
shaft stroke was altered by varying the voltage to the Vibromix, and
during operation the power input to the fermenter was less than one
watt.
Must was supplied to the fermenter by means of a variable speed
(zeromax gearbox made by Gibson Battle and Co. Ltd, Rydalmere, NSW.)
pump (assembled by the SBT) through a silicone tube of medical quality
(J.C. Ludowici and Son Ltd, Castle Hill, NSW). Each time the pump
speed setting was changed, the must flow rate was recalibrated by
collecting the must pumped through the fermenter between samplings,
usually a 12 or 24 hour period.
3.13 Temperature Control of Fermentation
The temperature meter (SBT) used a thermister (Model No. F23B, STC
Cannon Components Pty Ltd, Liverpool, NSW), which fitted into the well
on the side of the fermenter (Fig. 4).
51.
Fig. 4. Fermentation Vessel.
K, outlet tube for partially fermented must; L, thermister well;
M, flange and clamp assembly; pipettes N.O.P, respectively for must
entry, yeast culture entry, and steam entry; Q, foam escape tube;
R, effluent gas outlet and condenser; S, Mackley filter; T, mixer
shaft diaphragm; U, recirculation loop; V, fortifying spirit
reservoir; W, fortification tube; X, pH probe; Y, vessel for
monitoring DOT in grape juice; Z, infra-red reflector lamp.
52.
The well was partly filled with glycerol to ensure liquid contact between
'the thermistor and the fermenter wall. The thermister was a temperature
variable resistor forming one arm in the Wheatstone bridge circuit of
the temperature meter. The temperature meter (Fig. 5) was calibrated
with a mercury thermometer to read between 16 and 32°C.
The temperature of the fermentation was controlled with an Ether Mini
temperature controller type 1990/1 which had a Resistance Thermometer
type P5 sensor (Electro Chemical Engineering, Artarmon, NSW). The
controller was standardised against the temperature meter by the
controller setting knob (Fig. 5). Control over the temperature of
fermentation was maintained with an infra-red reflector lamp
(275 watt, type FJ26, Osram) that was finely controlled by a time-
proportional (or anticipatory) control system. This system prevented
over-shooting of the set temperature. For fermentations 3°C above
ambient temperature, the above control system was adequate, however,
for fermentations at lower temperatures, temperature control required
a cooling system together with the infra-red reflector lamp.
3.14 Constant Parameters pH and 0xygen
The steam sterilizable pH probe (Model No.SS12DY, Jacoby Mitchell and
Co. Pty Ltd, North Rocks, NSW) was set into a B19 Quickfit socket in
the wall of the fermenter (Fig 4) and together with the pH meter
(Dvnaco Model 21A Jacoby Mitchell) (Fig. 5) was calibrated against
standard buffer solutions. The dissolved oxygen tension (DOT) in the
grape juice was monitored with a Johnson-type oxygen probe (Johnson
and Borkowski, 1967) with some modifications (SBT, Fig. 6, Cootes
and Lee, 1977).
53.
The current generated in the probe was amplified (SBT) and read on a
0-100 microamp meter in the control panel (Fig. 5). The meter was
zeroed by placing the probe in boiled grape juice; the meter scale
was then expanded to full deflection to read 100%, when the oxygen
probe was placed in vigorously aerated grape juice.
Fig. 5. Continuous fermentation assembly control panel; a, temperature
meter; b, temperature controller with setting adjustment;
c, dissolved oxygen meter; d, pH meter.
The heat exchange capacity of the recirculation loop (Fig. 4), which
was placed in a cold water bath, was adequate to maintain a constant
temperature fermentation provided the temperature of the coolant (cold
water) was 5°C lower than the fermentation temperature required. The
temperature of the coolant bath was adjusted by changing the coolant
pump speed (variable speed pump, SBT) and the quantity of ice in the
coolant reservoir (Fig. 3).
54.
Fig, 6. Dissolved oxygen probe constructed by the author.
e, lead anode; f, silver cathode; g, teflon membrane; h, electrolyte;
i, glass wool.
3.2 Materials
3,21 Yeast
Five strains of ScLccha/iomycte c.2Ji&vAj>iaz were used in the continuous
fermentation experiments. Each culture was received in good condition
on agar slants; their origins were as follows:
strains 729 and 350 (tort yeast) from the Australian Wine Research
Institute (AWRI); strains 505 (Champagne yeast) and 522 (Montrachet
yeast) from the Department of Viticulture and Enology, University of
California, Davis; and strain B19 from the New York State Agricultural
Experiment Station, Geneva, New York State (Cornell University,
Geneva - CUG).
55.
3.22 Grape Juice
In experiments one to four, Muscat Gordo grape juice from the Barossa
Valley was filtered into the storage vessel (Fig. 7) through D9 filter
pads (Ekwip Industrial Equipment, Paddington, NSW) followed by a 0.2
micron membrane (Sartorius Membranfilter GMBH Guttingen) and held at
2°C until required. The grape juice vessel could be autoclaved after
which it could be filled and emptied by means of the inlet and
branched outlet (Fig. 7) to avoid airborne contamination. In experiments
five to ten, Semilion grape juice was stored in plastic bags (Fig. 8) oand held at -5 C. The plastic bags, commonly used to store wine in the
"Bag in a Box" package, consisted of laminated layers of polyethylene
and polyvinylidene chloride. There was no evidence of damage to the
bag as a result of freezing.
3-23 Alcohol Fortification
Fortifying spirit 95% v/v ethyl alcohol concentration was held in a
500 ml reservoir (Fig. 4) prior to pumping into the wine fortification
tube (Fig 4). The peristaltic pump (Fig. 3, SBT) was controlled by a
one-hour cycle time clock (SBT) to make either 3 or 6 minute-long
injections of fortifying spirit at regular intervals.
56.
Fig. 7. Sterile grape juice vessel and ancillary services; j, Mackley
filter; k, silicone tubing; 1, sterile stainless steel union;
m, 20 1 Pyrex vessel; n, rubber bung; o, live steam; p, condenser
cooling water; q, gas for flame sterilizing.
Fig. 8. Non-sterile grape juice vessel, r, flexible plastic bung;
s, laminated bag; t, rozen grape juice; u, Olympus microscope.
57.
3.3 Methods
3.31 Yeast Growth and Preparation of Inoculumi ■'" 1" ' "T '1 - ^ r n ‘ " r 1 T 1" "
Each yeast culture was subcultured on potato dextrose agar at three-
monthly intervals and stored at 5°C until required. The yeast inoculum
for each fermentation run was prepared as follows:
A 250 ml sample of grape juice was filtered through a D9 pad and a
0.2 micron membrane into a 500 ml inoculation flask (Fig. 9), which was
autoclaved for 10 min to sterilize the juice and remove all free SO^
which would inhibit yeast growth.
After cooling the juice to approximately 26°C, a loop of yeast cells from
the agar slant, warmed to room temperature during the previous 24 hr, was
dispersed in the sterile grape juice; the flask was incubated for 48 hr
at 26°C on a rotary shaking table (SBT, 100 cycles/min) which ensured
oxygen transfer to promote aerobic growth and a high viable cell concentration
in the culture. After 48 hr, the culture lost its brown colour, indicating
rapid yeast growth and the change to fermentative metabolism.
After sterilizing the one litre fermenter, 900 ml of grape juice was pumped
into it and 0.3 ml of 30% Wfl0 added to Semi11 on, and 0.9 ml was added
if Muscat Gordo grape juice was used (Appendix 6.5). The fermenter was
then aerated for 10 min to remove any remaining S0£. This grape juice
was not sterile and therefore could not be aerated further due to the
presence of non-fermentative yeasts and bacteria, which were still viable
after the frozen grape juice had been thawed. After the addition of ther
inoculum, 20-30x10 cell s/ml were expected in the one litre fermentation
vessel. The yeast grew anaerobically until the alcohol concentration
was 4.5% v/v after which time a continuous grape juice feed was begun.
50.
Fig. 9. Inoculation flask, v, cotton wool bung; w, aluminium foil
cover; x, silicone tubing; y, stainless steel union.
3.32 Preparation and Preservation of Grape Juice
Muscat Gordo grape juice, at 25° Brix and pH 3.4, was used for the
preliminary experiments. This juice had been stored at S. Smith &
Son Pty Ltd for three months at 2-7°C in a pressure tank under 500
kilopascals pressure of CO^. The juice contained 330-10 mg/1 SO^
as determined by the method of Rankine and Pocock (1970). The juice,
which was contaminated with yeast and bacteria and had partially browned,
was anaerobically filtered through a 21 cm diam. Sartorius membrane
filter of 0.2 micron pore size into a 20 litre sterile vessel and
then stored at 20C^1°C.
Semi 11 on grapes grown on the Rosemount Estate Vineyard at Denman in the
Upper Hunter Valley were used for the remaining experiments. The must
of 18.5 Brix and pH 3.2 was sulphited, treated with a pectic enzyme
59.
preparation (Klerzyme 500) at the crusher and settled overnight at 12°C.
•The total sulphur dioxide content was adjusted to 120 mg/1 in the clear
juice, and 0.5 g/1 of tartaric acid was added to bring the titratable
acid of the juice to 7.9 g/1. The juice showed no visible haze, and
was subsequently filled into plastic bags (Fig. 8) under CO^ pressure.
The bags were immediately frozen with dry ice and transfered to a -5°C
room. Six months later, when the juice was thawed, there was no
significant change in pH or the S0? level, and the total acid content
had fallen by 0.2 g/1 due to potassium bitartrate deposition.
3.33 Sterilization of Fermentation Vessel
Three important features of the fermentation vessel - it is constructed
of pyrex, all inlets and outlets are silicone tubing and the stainless
steel stirrer shaft enters through a neoprene diaphragm - allow the
whole fermenter, including air inlet ducts and probes, to be sterilized
with live steam. Micro-organisms can produce spores resistant to steam
at 100°C, therefore, the whole apparatus was autoclaved (Model No.
185U334 Atherton Pty Ltd, Frskineville, NSW) for 30 min every six
months.
Before each experiment, the apparatus was live steamed for one hr, and
the following day live steamed for half an hr, just prior to intro
duction of the grape juice. The pH and oxygen probes were steamed for
only half an hr, and between fermentations were stored in absolute
alcohol. The sampling port on the fermenter, at the base of the cir
culation tube (Fig. 4), was heated for 10 min with live steam after each
samp!ing.
60.
3.34 Estimation of Dry Weight of Yeast
Pyrex test tubes with 5 ml capacities were baked for 12 hr at 105°C
and fared. Samples of fermenting must (5 ml) were centrifuged at
2,500 rpii. for 5 min in a small bench centrifuge. The cells were
washed twice with distilled water, dried for 24 hr at 105°C and weighed.
3.35 Estimation of Yeast Cell Concentration
SaccfiaAomycdA ccAevxksTac strains 729, 350, 522 and B19 formed light
flocculations which could be dispersed by rapid agitation. Cell
concentrations of these strains were measured by direct cell counting
and spectrophotometrically with a Spectronic 20. Yeast cell concentration3 2was estimated with the Hawks ley haemocytometer slide, which had 2.5x10 mm
counting squares and was 0.1 mm deep. Degassed, fermenting must was
diluted 1:25, read in a Spectronic 20 at 670 mm and introduced under
the haemocytometer covers!ip with a pasteur pipette; yeast cells were
counted in 10 squares under an Olympus Model E microscope. The number
of budding yeast cells was also counted to give an index of the yeast
cell growth status.
3.36 Estimation of Total Soluble Solids of Fermenting Must
The cylindrical vessel containing a floating hydrometer (Fig. 3) was
used as a method for estimating the total soluble solids in the fermen
tation vessel. The Brix hydrometer was necessary as an indication of
fermentation rate (disappearance of grape sugar) at the beginning of
continuous grape juice feeding, and after a temperature or dilution
rate change. The cylinder containing the hydrometer was as small as
practicable to hold an 8-14° Brix hydrometer. The Brix reading was
temperature corrected (Amerine and Ough, 1974) and used to calculate
the quantity of fortifying spirit to be added to the partially fermented
must.
61.
3.37 Estimation of Ethanol Concentration of Fermenting Must
Samples of must (10-15 ml) were taken at 12 or 24 hr intervals,
degassed and centrifuged; the supernatant was frozen for ethanol
analysis with a Beckman-4 gas chromatograph (Beckman Instruments,
Inc., Fullerton, USA). The operating conditions of the gas
chromatograph were as follows:
Column - stainless steel, 1.8 metres long 2mm internal
diameter, packed with Porapak Q (100-120 mesh),
temperature 180°C
Injection Temperature - 280°C
Detector - hydrogen flame ionization with chamber at 230°C;
hydrogen was burnt in air
Carrier gas - nitrogen 40 ml/min
Sample size - one pi injected by a 1 pi syringe (Scientific Glass
Engineering, Melbourne, Victoria).
Chart recorder - Speedomax W (Leeds and Northup Co., Philadelphia, USA),
Chart speed 2.538 cm/min
Integrator - Disc Model 224 (Disc instruments, Santa Ana, USA).
The length of the integration line printed by the integrator between its
upper and lower limit (Fig 10) v/as proportional to the area under each
ethanol peak; therefore, the ethanol concentration in the sample was
estimated from the length of this line. The chromatogragh was standardized
with a 5% aqueous ethanol solution, and the accuracy of the method was•f- 0.1% ethanol at this concentration. The ethanol concentration of
the fortified wine was also measured by this method after a 1:4 volumetric
dilution. The column was repacked after 12 months operation.
62.
Internal Standard5% Ethanol
WINE WINEA B
l
Integration Line
MINUTES
Fig, 10. Alcohol peaks from the gas chromatograph and the corresponding integration lines for the estimation of the area under the peaks of wine and standard 5% aqueous ethanol samples.
63.
3.38 Calculation for Fortification of Fermenting Must
The fortifying spirit pump and time clock were calibrated to give
3 ml doses of 95% ethanol (EtOH) at regular intervals varying from
1-12 doses per hr. All wine from the fermentation vessel was
measured in a 500 ml measuring cylinder, to give a flow rate (ml/hr)
of partially fermented must. The amount of EtOH to be dosed into the
outflow stream of partially fermented must from the fermenter was
calculated as follows:
ml ethanol /hr = gL.lerm.ent_iaajnustJfcB)(EtOM% in fortifying spirit-A),
where A is the desired ethanol content in the final wine (18.6, in
these experiments) and B is the ethanol content of the fermenting
must at fortification. The final °Brix of the wine depends on the
amount of ethanol added and the initial °Brix of the grape juice,
hence variations in the final °Brix (p.269, Amerine, Berg and Cruess,
1972) occurred directly as the ethanol concentration in the fermenter
changed; therefore it was necessary to adjust the °3rix of the final
wine to achieve the desired style of finished wine.
3.39 Stabilization of New Wine
New wine from the fermenter was stabilized in a 1 litre flask containing
approximately one days yield from the fermenter. After the addition
of 50 mg/1 SO^, the wine was Brix adjusted and fined by the addition
of 5 ml/I of bentonite slurry (80 g/1 in water) and stored at 5°C
until bottling. A stainless steel, 11 cm Sartorious membrane filter
together with wine bottles, were autoclaved for 15 min prior to
bottling, the corks soaked in a 5% SO^ solution and the screw caps soaked
in 95% ethanol for 2 hr.
64,
Fig. 11. New wine, filtration assembly, a, compressed CO^ (food grade);
b, Ekwip laboratory filter (Model 11) and wine receiver; c, Sartorious
Membrane filter housing; d, silicone tubing and filling tube;
e, bottled clarified wine.
The standard wad for the screw caps was neoprene (to enable autoclaving),
but was found to have an undesirable odour and was replaced with a
polyethylene foam wad. The wine was racked off the bentonite lees and
filled under vacuum into the receiver (Fig. 11); the receiver was
pressurised with nitrogen to push the wine through D9 filter pads and
through a 0.2 micron membrane filter into the bottle. Sulphur dioxide
(30 mg/1) was added to the wine at bottling. The bottled wine was
stored at room temperature until tasting.
65.
4. RESULTS
4.1 Preliminary Experiments in Continuous Fermentation of Grape Juice
for the Production of Fortified Sweet Wine
No previous work has been reported on the production of fortified sweet
wine in a laboratory fermenter fitted with continuous fortification
equipment (description of fermenter, Section 3.1), although some data
has been documented in relation to the continuous fermentation of grape
juice (Section 2). Most of the reports concerning the production of
still wines have been general, qualitative reviews of commercial
experience rather than quantitative dissertations using controlled
fermenters. The most recent work on the continuous fermentation of
grape juice was that reported by Barre and Combe (1975), who discussed
a good feedback control system for controlling fermentation rate
(Section 2.24). Consequently,prelimi nary experiments in this study
were designed to establish suitable dilution rates to maintain constant
ethanol concentration in the fermenter with Australian grape juice as
the substrate and several yeasts that are currently used in the wine
1ndustry.
4.11 Removal of SO^ from Grape Juice
Grape juice storage for use in the 1 litre laboratory fermenter has
been discussed briefly in Section 3.32, and as a result of the high levelst
of SO^ required to protect the Muscat Gordo grape juice from oxidation
and microbial spoilage, the juice used for preparation of yeast starter
cultures was desulphited with hydrogen peroxide (Appendix 6.5).
The stoichiometric oxidation of SO^ to the sulphate ion is shown in the
following reactions:
66.
SO 2 + ^ H^SO^
2HS03" + H202 ------ -> 2H2S04 + 2e”
The quantity of hydrogen peroxide required depends on the form or the
oxidation stage of sulphur in its dissociated form in solution. A
series of test additions of H202 was made to the grape juice, and the
residual S02 levels are shown in Table 7.
Table 7. Residual S02 in grape juice after addition of H202-
Grape juice sample
Addition of cone
H202 (ml/1)
Free S02
(mg/1)
Total S0p
(mg/l)
1 - - 330
2 - - 345
3 - - 342
4 - - 338
5 0.1 16 180
6 0.1 32 175
7* 0.3 - 10
8* 0.3 - 3
Q ** 0.3 -
10** 0.3 ~ -
* Samples 7 and 8 were shaken and immediately assayed.
** Samples 9 and 10 were allowed to stand for 10 min after shaking.
4.12 First Preliminary Continuous Fermentation Experiment
An initial preliminary experiment was carried out to test the equipment
and establish a suitable dilution rate for steady state continuous
fermentation.
67.
Ethanol production from sterile, filtered grape juice by AWRI 729 and
•some fermenter variables are presented, in table 8. The DOT in the
grape juice was arbitrarily set between 10-12% saturation or
approximately 1 mg/1 09 at 22°C. The initial dilution rate of 0.12 hr~^
caused the yeast to wash out of the fermenter, and subsequently a
dilution rate of 0.033 hr""^ was used. Direct cell counts and visual
observation indicated no morphological changes of the yeast cells.
Three wines were made from the production of the fermenter at various
intervals during the run, and due to fluctuations in grape juice
addition and overfortification, the ethanol contents of these wines
varied between 14-20.5%v/v EtOH, and Brix readings varied from
5.6-10.7° Brix.
4.13 Second Prelimi nary Continuous Fermentation Experi ment_]
The dilution rate was set in the range 0.015-0.042 hr in the second
preliminary experiment (Table 9) and in an attempt to simulate industrial
conditions, DOT in the grape juice was set at 50-60%. However, from
subsequent calculations based on the normal requirement of yeast
grown aerobically to consume 33 m mole 0^ (Gray, personal communication)
to produce 1 g of cells, it was apparent that grape juice saturated
with oxygen on being added to an active fennentation at 25 ml/hr was
contributing less than 0.2 mg 0p/hr or 0.1% of the oxygen required for
aerobic yeast growth.
The yeast productivity in molecules of ethanol/cell/sec (m EtOH/c/s)
(Appendix 6.71) provides an average ethanol production per cell, assuming
a constant dilution rate and constant ethanol concentration in the
partially fermented must.
68.
Table 8. A preliminary experiment on the continuous production of
fortified sweet wine in a 1 litre fermenter from sterile filtered,
Muscat Gordo grape juice (25°Brix, pH 3.4) and using S.
strain AWRI 729.
Sample
Time (hr)
DOT
(%)
Yeast count
(cells/mlxl0^)
Temp.
(°C)
pH Di1ution
rate (hr~^)
Eton
(%v/v)Fermenter
product!vi ty (g Et0H/l/hr)
48 11.5 80 22.5 3.2 0.033 7.1 1.8
58 11.5 100 21.5 3.2 0.033 - -
70 12.0 110 21.5 3.2 0.033 6.0 1.5
74 12.0 120 21.5 3.2 0.033 5.5 1.4
82 12.0 260 22.0 3.2 - 6,2 -
94 11.5 - 22.5 3.2 - ~ -
106 11.0 260 21.5 3.2 - 6.7 -
118 5.0 120 21.5 3.2 - - -
130 1.0 — 22.0 3.2 - 4.75
Table 9. A preliminary experiment on the continuous production of fortified sweet
wine in a 1 litre fermenter from sterile filtered Gordo grape juice (25° Brix, pH 3.4)
and using S. cerevislae 729.
Samp! etime
(da/s)
DOT Yeast count Temp
{%) (cells/ml xleP) (°C)
pH Dilution rate
(hr'1)
EtO’rl Yeast producti vi ty+
(%v/v) (mEtOH/c/S x 107)
Fermenter producti vi ty
(gEtOH/1/hr)
2 57 128 22.5 3.2 0.042 6 5.65 0.82
3 57 155 22.5 3.2 0.015 7 1.9 0.99
4 56 145 23 3.2 0.018 7 2.4 1.22
5 56 138 23 3.2 0.023 7 3.3 1.22
6 57 130 24 3.2 0.023 6.5 3.3 1.17
7 57 130 22 3.2' 0.023 6.6 3.3 1.19
8 55 128 22.5 3.2 0.023 6.5 3.4 1.18
9 55 130 22.5 3.2 0.023 6.5 3.3 1.17
10 55 138 22 3.2 0.023 6.3 3.3 1.16
11 55 140 22 3.2 0.023 6.5 3.3 1.18
12 54 130 22.5 3.2 0.023 6.3 3.2 1.14
13 54 no 23.5 .3.2 0.023 6.4 3.8 1.15
14 54 no 23.5 3.2 0.024 6.3 3.9 1.19
15 54 no 22.5 3.2 0.024 6.3 4.0 1.2116 54 155 22.5 3.2 0.024 6.2 3.8 1.1617 55 145 22.5 3.2 0.025 6.3 3.1 1.2318 - - - - - - - -
19 55 140 23 3.2 0.025 6.5 3.3 1.2820 55 155 25 3.2 0.024 6.9 3.0 1.3021 54 145 22 3.2 0.024 7.1 3.4 1.3622 54 155 22 3.2 0.025 7.3 3.4 1.4423 54 155 22 3.2 0.024 7.4 3.3 1.3924 55 140 26 3.2 0.024 - - -
25 - 130 26 3.2 0.024 - - -
+ Yeast productivity - molecules EtOH/cell/second x 10?
70.
The fermenter productivity (g EtOH/l/hr, Appendix 6.72) is used as an
,index of fermentation rate (g EtOH/hr).
The second preliminary continuous fermentation (Table 9) was run for
24 days to demonstrate that prolonged fermentation was feasible. Rod
bacteria were detectable after 11 days, and their concentration reached7
10 cells/ml at the end of the fermentation. During the fermentation
the ethanol concentration in the fermenter varied between 6.2-7.4% v/v;
fermenter productivity did not fall significantly after the onset of
the bacterial infection. The infection was believed to have entered
the fermenter in the filtered grape juice, however, no attempt was made
to improve the capacity or design of the filtration equipment, as it
was planned to use unfiltered, fresh grape juice after the 1976 vintage.
4.2 Semi-continuous Grape Juice Addition to the Fermenter for the
Production of Fortified Sweet Wine
The two preliminary experiments demonstrated that the 1 litre continuous
fermenter was suitable for prolonged production (24 days) of fortified
sweet wine. However, previous experience in industry showed that
irregular deliveries of grapes to the winery could lead to prolonged
storage of grape juice prior to addition to the fermenter (Appendix 6.4)
and under such circumstances the juice needs to be refrigerated to
prevent wild organisms from beginning the fermentation. Simple addition
of high levels of SO^ is considered detrimental to quality and an
expensive additional operation, since desulphitation would be necessary
and is not a legal additive to grape juice or wine in Australia.
In order to avoid storage of grape juice and the extra costs of
refrigerating the grape juice to approximately 5°C, semi-continuous
addition of grape juice to the fermenter was considered.
71.
Toth and Tengerdy (1952) reported consecutive draining off and batch
additions of 50-60% of the fermenter volume, but no quantitative
productivity comparisons were made with continuous grape juice addition.
Consequently two experiments were designed to simulate the commercial
situation of unavoidable breaks in the supply of grapes to the winery,
which may arise in traditional vineyard management practice as a result
of manual grape picking by day, or in more mechanised vineyards as a
result of mechanical harvesting at night.
Semi-continuous addition of grape juice to the 1 litre fermenter using
strain 729 was achieved in the first semi-continuous experiment by
blocking the outlet tube from the fermenter, so that the fermenter volume
increased during each 12 hr period between sampling. The equivalent
dilution rates presented (Table 10) do not take into account the
increased residence time of some of the partially fermented must. The
temperature of the fermenting must was maintained at 22°C and the pH,
which was initially 3.4, declined to 3.2 after two days, and then
remained constant.
The second semi-continuous'experiment using strain 350 (Table 11)
incorporated two new design features in addition to those used in the
first semi-continuous experiment. Firstly, semi-continuous grape juice
addition was modified so that grape juice was added in a single dose
at 12 hr intervals. This was achieved by blocking the fermenter outlet,
adding between 300-400 ml of grape juice, then 12 hr later estimating
cell concentration before stopping agitation.
72.
Table 10. Semi-continuous addition of Muscat Gordo grape juice
(25° Brix, pH 3.4) and using S. cerevisiae 729.
Sanpletime(hr)
Yeast count
(cel 1 s/ml xic£)
Temp
(°c)
Equivalentdilution rate
(hr-"1)
Cell growth
(mg/l/hr)
EtOH Yeast productivity
(£v/v) (mEtOH/c/S x 10^)4
Fermenterproducti vi ty
(gEt0H/l/hr)
48 121 22 0.031 189 6.7 5.0 1.66
60 128 22 0.031 204 5.5 3.8 1.36
72 128 22 - - 6.3 - -
84 120 22 0.030 180 6.0 4.3 1.94
. 95 110 22 0.028 157 5.2 3.3 1.10
108 100 22 0.030 152 5.0 3.9 . 1.20
120 100 22 0.029 149 5.2 3.9 1.22
4 Yeast productivity - molecules of ethanol/cell/sec
Secondly, the flocculent yeast S. ceAzviAiaz AWRI 350 was used to allow
internal recycle of cells. After agitation was stopped, large clumps of
cells settled rapidly under gravitation and as a result a low concentration
of cells remained at the top of the fermenter. The fermenting must from
the top of the fermenter was decanted, and the outlet tube was clamped
before commencing the stirrer and further sampling for analysis. In
table 11 the grape juice addition was averaged over the 12 hr period to
give a value for the equivalent dilution rate. Estimates of fermenter
productivity (g EtOH/l/hr) and yeast productivity (molecules EtOH/c/s)
were calculated from the data obtained by sampling the fermenter prior
to decanting. The sample, prior to direct cell count, was diluted 1:50
with distilled water and mechanically agitated for 10 min to disperse
cells - clumps of 3-6 cells remained in most samples after this treatment.
73.
Vigorous agitation of samples led to inaccurate determination of the
percentage of cells budding; these readings were discontinued after
96 hr. No attempt was made to use an alternative method to estimate
% budding cells, as it was presumed that the low growth rate was due
to high cell count and that an increase in growth rate would be easily
observed.
Steady state was eventually achieved with a cell concentration between 6100-120x10 cells/ml, and fermenter productivity of approximately 0.6 g
Et0H/l/hr. It is not valid to make a statistical comparison between
cell counts and productivities in table 11 with those in table 9
because temperature, dilution rate and ethanol concentration in the
fermenter were not comparable. Given these differences, however, it is
important to note that S. strain 350 produced between
2-3x10^ molecules EtOH/cel1/sec compared to 3-4xl0/ molecules EtOH/cel1/sec
produced by strain 729.
The initial cell concentration of strain 350 was attained by aerating the
1 litre fermenter prior to continuous grape juice addition. The bacterial
contamination, measured under a light microscope, using an haemocytometer
slide was higher at the begining of the experiment (4x10 cells/ml) than
after 188 hr (10 cells/ml). Three observations can be made from the
semi-continuous operation of the fermenter. Firstly, anaerobic conditions
and 5-6% v/v ethanol were largely inhibitory for the growth of contaminating
bacteria and their presence did not restrict the ethanol productivity of
the fermenter. Secondly, internal cell recycle was conveniently achieved
by using a flocculating yeast, but high cell concentrations in an anaerobic
fermenter inhibited cell growth, if the cell concentration was above
120xl06 cells/ml.
74.
Table 11. Semi-continuous addition of Muscat Gordo grape juice (25° Brix, pH 3.4)
and using S. cerevisiae 350.
Sample Yeast count
time before decanting
(hr) (cells/ml x10^)
cells
buddi ng(«)
Yeast count Temp Equivalent EtOH Yeast product!vity4 Fermenter
after decanting dilution rate productivity
(cells/ml xlO6) (°C) (hr-1) (*v/v) (irEtOH/c/S x 107) (gEt0H/l/hr)
48 360 32 400 22.0 0.035 6.4 1.8 1.76
60 400 19 440 21.7 0.030 6.7 1.4 1.58
72 355 21 400 21.5 0.035 6.8 1.9 1.88
84 310 17 380 21.2 0.034 6.3 2.0 1.71
96 275 - 310 19.5 0.035 5.7 2.0 1.57
108 245 - 275 20.0 0.030 5.6 2.0 1.30
120 210 - 245 21.7 0.031 5.8 2.2 1.42
136 165 - 210 19.5 0.027 5.4 2.6 1 .15
154 165 - 245 19.0 0,020 5.4 2.0 0.87
178 145 - 175 18.2 0.017 5.4 2.3 0.72
192 145 - 160 19.5 0.016 5.6 1 .9 0.71
216 no - 145 19.5 0.017 5.5 2.3 0.76
240 100 - 135 19.5 0.020 5.5 3.1 0.87
261 120 - 145 20.5 0.012 6.1 1.6 0.57
288 120 - _ 20,5 0.013 6.0 1.7 0.61
4 Yeast productivity - molecules of ethanol/cell/sec
Thirdly, it was possible to make fortified sweet wine of acceptable quality
by semi-continuous, grape juice addition to the fermenter. No attempt was
made to measure the variation in yeast productivity between successive grape
juice additions. It was apparent that the fermentation reached steady state_1
between 164-188 hr with a dilution rate between 0.012-0.013 hr . This is
equivalent to a 76-83 hr retention time for the fermenting must, which is
understandably high since the grape juice contained 330-345 mg/1 SO^.
75.
Eight wines were made during this experiment, and these wines were
preferred when compared to those from previous experiments. The
improvement in quality was attributed to the yeast 350. The wines
retained a richer muscat character and appeared to be more palatable.
In all experiments with Muscat Gordo juice which had been stored
for up to 10 months without freezing and had browned slightly,
continuous fermentation stripped the brown colour from the juice,
producing a straw yellow wine (Fig. 12).
Before Afterfermentation fermentation
Fig. 12 Removal of brown pigment during continuous fermentation of
browned Muscat Gordo grape juice.
Two reasons for the removal of the brown pigment are postulated;
firstly, the strong reducing conditions during continuous fermentation
(low - Martakov, 1970) reduce flavonoids, melanins and the other
coloured compounds (Peri oX at., 1971) and secondly, the coloured
compounds are adsorbed onto the protein and carbohydrates in yeast
cell walls (Fleet, personal communication), which resulted in grey-
76.
brown yeast sediments in the gross lees.
t
4.3 Continuous Fermentation using Different Strains of S. eg
There has been no work reported in the literature concerning the ethanol
productivity of different yeast strains in continuous fermentation,
hence the next series of experiments was designed to compare the
fermentation rates of five strains of S. ceAzv^-lae. in the continuous
fermenter developed for the production of fortified sweet wine.
Previous work (Ough, 1966a5b} on the kinetics of alcoholic fermentation
have been concerned with changing sugar and ethanol concentrations
normally encountered in batch fermentations. Amerine and Joslyn (1970)
have commented that there is an inverse relation between fermentation
rate and flavour quality; this relationship was assessed in these
five experiments. Some of the fermentations were extended to achieve
steady state conditions at different temperatures. The five strains
compared were AWRI 729, 350; UCD 522, 505; and CUG B19. The first
two strains were chosen because they are widely used throughout the
world for still wine production, and 505 is also widely used for
champagne making; 350 or 'port' yeast is used for dessert wine
production in Australia and is recognised as producing a flowery
bouquet character; 729 is the most extensively used wine yeast in
Australia; and B19 was selected by Professor Steinkraus (Cornel Uni
versity, Geneva, New York) for his experiments in 'rapid' and con
tinuous fermentations.
The productivity data for the five yeasts are presented in tables
12-16. Strain 505 or ’Champagne' yeast was the only yeast in these
experiments which could not be counted by direct cell count in an
haemocytometer slide under a light microscope.
77.
This became apparent only after the beginning of continuous grape juice addition to the fermenter after which the cells flocculated strongly, consequently an alternative method was immediately adopted.The most accurate method was considered to be determination of yeast dry weight by incubation for 12 hr at 105°C after washing and centrifuging. The cell count was then calculated by assuming that 1 g dry cells/1 was equivalent to 102x10 cells/ml (Appendix 6.8).The low dilution rate for yeast strain B19 after 60 hr (Table 16) was due to fatigue and stretching of the must pump tube.
The fermenter productivity of each yeast strain and the ethanol concentrations attained at 26°C at varying dilution rates without internal recycle are presented in figures 13-15. Lines have been fitted to the data points by visual estimation so that the differences between yeast strains can be easily observed. The range of dilution rates, 0.039-0.095 hr~\ was narrow and resulted from the practical requirement to produce partially fermented must at approximately 4.5% v/v ethanol. If this ethanol concentration had not been maintained the ethanol and grape sugar concentrations would have varied so much that no realistic sensory evaluation of the finished wines could have been made nor would the control of wild organisms have been as effective, for a dilution rate above 0.1 hr~\ that is an average retention time for must in the fermenter of less than 10 hr, one could still expect steady state both in fermenter productivity, cell concentration (which
rmay be as low as 30x10 cells/ml) and ethanol concentration which may have been as low as 3% v/v.
70.
Table 12. Continuous addition of Semillon grape juice (18.5° Brix, pH 3.1) to a 1
litre fermenter using S. cerevisiae strain 729 for the production of fortified
sweet wine.
Sample Yeast count cells Temp
time
(hr) (cell s/ml x 1(f) budding(%) (°C)
Di 1 ution
rate
(hr'1)
Retention
time
(hr)
EtOH Yeast productivity* Fermenter
producti vi ty
(?v/v) (mEtOH/c/S x 107) (gEt0H/l/hr)
48 132 40 25.5 0.041 24 4.9 4.3 1.57
72 167 20 28.0 0.041 24 6.4 4.7 2.04
96 162 32 26.0 0.039 25 6.6 4.2 2.03
120 120 30 26.0 0.060 16 5.4 7.7 2.55
144 120 29 25.8 0.067 15 4.5 7.2 2.38
168 96 20 26.0 0.080 13 4.0 9.4 2.40
192 105 34 26.0 0.080 13 4.1 8.9 2.59
216 115 40 25.5 0.078 13 3.9 7.5 2.40
240 107 32 25.8 0.078 13 4.1 8.5 2.52
264 115 40 26.0 0.080 13 4.2 8.3 2.65
288 78 75 21.5 0.078 13 3.3 9.4 2.03
312 115 25 21.5 0.061 16 4.9 7.4 2.35
4 Yeast productivity - molecules ethanol/cell/sec
If the level of 4.5% v/v is accepted as a desirable level to inhibit wild
organism growth (Section 2.24), then the corresponding dilution rates
for each yeast can be estimated from the graphs at 0.07, 0.052, 0.076,
0.1 and 0.076 respectively (Figs 13-15) for 729, 350, 522, 505 and B19.
Similarly at these dilution rates, which are also the optimal growth
rates for each yeast in must at 4.5% EtOH, expected fermenter productivities
can also be estimated by reference to the fermenter productivity curve at
the above dilution rate for each yeast strain, that is respectively 2.5,
1.2, 2.6, 3.4 and 2.7 g Et0H/l/hr (Figs 13-15).
79.
Table 13. Continuous addition of Semillon grape juice (18.5° Brix,
pH 3.1) to a 1 litre fermenter using S. cerevlsiae strain 350 for the
production of fortified sweet wine.
Samp!e Yeast count ccl 1 s Temp Dilution rate Retention Eton Yeast productivity4 Fermentertine
(hr) (cell s/ml xl Cfi) budding(%) (°C) (hr'1)time
(hr) ("v/v) (mEtOH/c/S x IQ7)product! vi ty
(gE t OH/1 /hr)
48 102 44 26.0 0,067 15 3.4 6.3 1.78
72 48 33 26.5 0.069 15 3.6 14.7 1.84
96 49 65 25.5 0.078 13 3.0 13.S 1.87
120 64 50 26.0 0.078 13 3.7 12.8 2.28
144 42 80 25.5 0.079 13 3.0 16.2 1.87
168 72 58 26.0 0.079 13 3.4 10.7 2.12
192 40 65 26.0 0.079 13 3.3 18.7 2.05
216 68 70 22.0 0.079 13 3.0 10.0 1.87
240 61 55 23.0 0.079 13 3.2 11.9 2.00
264 104 85 22.5 0.078 13 3.3 7.1 2.03
288 96 15 22.0 0,079 13 3.1 7.2 1 .93
312 80 70 18.0 0.053 19 4.4 8.3 1 .84
336 90 60 18.0 0.053 19 3.4 5.7 1 .42
* Yeast productivity - molecules ethanol/cell/sec
Strain 505, a flocculent yeast, has the highest fermenter productivity;
the other flocculent strain 350 (Fig, 16) has the lowest. Strains 729,
522 and B19 have similar fermenter productivities at 26°C, 2.5, 2.6 and
2.7 respectively for dilution rates between 0.07-0.076 and for future
comparisons it is considered that there is no significant difference.
No exacting statistical analysis was applied to the fermenter productivity
data because it was felt that more data points were needed in figures 13-15
before regression lines could be mathematically fitted.
80.
The changes in cell morphology for 505 and 350 during continuous
fermentation are shown in figure 16(a,b). During fermentation prior
to continuous feed of grape juice, the cells were normal or ovoid in
shape (Fig. 16c,d). However, both 505 and 350 were flocculent and
after the commencement of continuous grape juice addition the floes
became larger and more difficult to disperse.
Table 14. Continuous addition of Semillon grape juice (18.5° Brix, pH 3.1) to a 1 litre
fermenter, using S. cerevisiae strain 522 for the production of fortified sweet wine.
Sampletime(hr)
Yeast cells Temp
(cel 1 S/frl x 1 (A) buddinc/X) (°C)
Dil utionrate
(hr'1)
Retentiontime(hr)
EtOH
(%v/v)
Yeast producti vi ty+
(mEtOH/c/S x 107)
Fermenterproducti vi ty
(gEt0H/l/hr)
48 100 - 22.0 0.048 21 4.0 5.5 1.51
72 100 36 21.5 0.048 21 3.9 5.4 1.48
96 90 25 21.5 0.045 22 3.4 5.0 1 .20
120 67 40 22.0 0.069 16 3.6 10.6 1.96
144 40 64 22.0 0.069 16 3.4 16.8 1.85
168 45 30 22.0 0.069 16 4.6 20.2 2.50
192 50 48 22.0 0.069 16 4.4 17.4 2.40
216 115 24 26.0 0.069 16 4.8 8.2 2.61
240 105 32 26.0 0.086 12 4.1 9.6 2.78
264 75 33 26.0 0.086 12 ' 4.0 13.1 2.68
288 62 60 26.5 0.086 12 4.0 15.7 2.68
312 37 56 26.0 0.083 12 4.0 25.4 2.62
+ Yeast productivity - molecules ethanol/cel 1/sec
At the. same time elongation of the cells was evident. Day, Poon and
Stewart (1975) showed an increase in cell wall fimbriae with an
increase in flocculence, and McMurrough and Rose (1967) found an
increase in cell wall phosphorus and protein contents as the cells
elongated. Both of these hypotheses are consistent with the increased
flocculence and elongation found in 350 and 505 in these experiments.
81.
Table 15. Continuous addition of Semillon grape juice (18.5° Brix, pH 3.1) to
q 1 litre fermenter, using 5. cerevisiae strain 505 for the production of
fortified sweet wine.
Sample
time
(hr)
Yeast count Temp 1
(cells/ml xlO6) (°C)
Dilution rate Retention
time
(hr-1) (hr)
EtOH
(2v/v)
Yease prcducti vi ty+
(mEtOH/c/S x in7)
Fermenter
producti vity
(gEt0H/l/hr)
48 65 26 0.078 13 4.9 16.7 2.98
60 56 26 0.072 14 4.6 17.0 2.61
72 70 27 0.072 14 4.6 13.4 2.58
84 90 26 0.095 11 4.6 13.8 2.41
96 130 26 0.093 11 4.6 9.3 3.34
108 140 26 0.094 11 4.6 8.9 3.41
+ Yeast productivity - molecules ethanol/cel 1/sec
Table 16 Continuous addition of Semi 11 on grape juice■ (18.5° Brix, pH 3.1) to a 1 litre
fermenter, using S. cerevisiae strain B1 9 for the production of fortified sweet wine.
Sampl e Yeast count Cells Temp Dilution Retention EtOH Yeast productivity+ Fermenter
time rate timb productivity
(hr) (cells/ml x 1C^) budding(X) (°C) (hH) (hr) (Sv/v) (m/EtOH/c/S x 107) (gE 10H/1/hr)
48 72 5 26.0 0.075 1 3 4.8 14.3 2.84
60 48 50 26.0 0.070 1 4 4.7 19.4 2.57
72 58 60 26.0 0.062 1 6 4.6 14.1 2.25
84 75 56 26.0 0.053 i 9 4.5 9.1 1.88
96 75 52 26.0 0.078 1 3 4.6 13.7 2.83
+ Yease productivity - molecules of ethanol/cel 1/sec
FER
MEN
TER
PROD
UC
TIV
ITY
(g Et
OH
/1/h
r)
82.
DILUTION RATE (hr'1)
Fig. 13. The relation between dilution rate, ethanol concen
tration and fermenter productivity for 5. strains 729
and 350 at 26°C; 729 - o,©; 350-q,c3 . ©,cs - ethanol concentration;
o, □-fermenter productivity.
ETH
AN
OL(
%v/
v)
83.
Fig. 14. The relation between dilution rate, ethanol concentration
and fermenter productivity for S. ceAeoAUae strains 522 and B19 at
26°C; 522-A,A; B19-o,o. (5,A~ethanol concentration; o,A-
fermenter productivity.
Fig. 15. The relation between dilution rate, ethanol concentration
and fermenter productivity for S. dOJiaviAicLt strain 505 at 26°C;
a -ethanol concentration; □ -fermenter productivity.
1
84.
(a) Strain 505 (x4,000)
(b) Strain 350 (x2,621)
; : S:(c) Strain 522 (x4,000)
fis
(d) Strain 729 (x4,000) j tr
' £Hik%£. 4Fig. 16. Effect of continuous fermentation on the morphology of four
strains of S, cQjiQ.\)Aj>iaa. Strain 350 (b) was photographed by Dr. M. Dixon
under a scanning electron microscope (Stereoscan, Model S4.10, Cambridge
Scientific Instruments Ltd, England); the rigid cell walls of strain 350
enabled air drying and gold coating before photographing (Appendix 6.9).
Strains 505(a), 522(c) and 729(d) were wet mounted cells, photographed
under a Zeitz light microscope using Kodachrome, 25 ASA.
85.
Strain 522 and 729 (Fig. 16c,d) and B19 (not shown) were normal or
ovoid during continuous fermentation and did not flocculate.
In the experiments with 729 and 350, wild bacteria entering the
fermenter with the natural sulphited grape juice were present inr
sufficient numbers (1x10° cell s/ml) to count after 200 hr, however,
they were still difficult to detect at the end of the experiments.
In the experiments with 522, 505 and B19, no bacteria were detected
by direct cell count even though they were expected to be viable
after the grape juice had been thawed (Section3.32). No regular
assays were made to estimate the bacteria status of the fermentations,
because the bacteria were not expected to grow faster than the dilution
rates used and contaminant analysis was undertaken only.if wine quality
v/as detrimentally affected. After 192 hr (Table 12) an unpleasant
H^S-type odour was detected in wines made from Semi lion grape juice
using strain 729. A Lysine medium (Appendix 6.10) was used to isolate
a wild yeast, which was pink in colour - further testing (Appendix 6.11)
indicated that the yeast was a non-fermenter and probably a species
of the genus Rkodoto^ula, It was therefore introduced into the
fermenter with the thawed grape juice and would not have been growing
in the fermenter. It is unlikely therefore to have contributed to the
off odours detected in the wines. Although it is possible that the bacteria
previously mentioned could contribute to the off odour, it is believed
that the odour v/as caused by the yeast S. strain 729; the
off odour did not persist in subsequent wines.
Thirty six wines were made from the five experiments. The volume of
each wine was approximately 1 litre or the output from the fermenter
in one day, depending on the dilution rate.
86.
One sample of each wine, adjusted to 18% v/v ethanol and 4.8°Brix,
has been stored at room temperature for future evaluation, while the
other sample of each wine was tasted by three professional wine
makers, who considered all samples commercially acceptable. Significant
aroma variation between and within experiments was apparent from the
wines prepared. This is contrary to earlier reports in the literature
by Amerine at at, (1972), who stated that wines made by continuous
fermentation were of uniform composition. It is considered that a
change in grape quality, variety or maturity will rapidly affect the
flavour of the product in a continuous fermenter producing fortified
sweet wine. This claim is valid if a relatively small fermenter
capacity is used and the average retention time approaches that
determined in the 1 litre laboratory fermenter, approximately 11-13 hr
(Tables 12-15). Grape juice with a high sugar concentration will have
a longer retention time, conversely if wines made have a higher sugar
requirement, the retention time will be shorter.
4.4 Control Procedures in Single-stage Continuous Fermentation of Grape
Juice for the Production of Fortified Sweet Wine
The previous experiments described in section 4.4 have provided valuable
information on yeast activity and fermenter productivity that will be
discussed here as an introduction to the next experiment, which will
define more accurately the effect of temperature on yeast activity in
continuous fermentation of grape juice.
An increase in the dilution rate at 96 hr after the commencement of the
experiment with strain 729 (Table 12, Fig. 17) reduces the ethanol
concentration in the fermenter, and a decrease in the dilution rate
87.
ooLUorZI—<cccLUD_SUJ i—
3
>- I—t—i
2
1
oJZ ZD\ o i— o ccO-zo•4-JLU ccLUcn z
-----UJz:DCUJLu.
0.08 i C-JZ0.07 LUh-<0.06 cc
zoHH0.05 f—z
J 0.042Q
>- CD
i—i X> COh- O
Q O
C£ LU
RE 130
LU O
SAMPLE TIME (hr)
6.5
5.5
4.5
3.5
100
50
0
>N.>Z5
oz<zh~1U
v__.
CDz>—IoQZCD
C/D_U-ULUC_D
Fig. 17. Effect of continuous addition of Semilion grape juice
(18.5°Brix, pH3.1) using S. coJitviAiaz strain 729 on yeast count (a),
cells budding (©), yeast productivity (v), ethanol (a), dilution
rate (ns), temperature (d), neuter productivity (o).
*yeast. productsmolecules &-VV\anol/cell/sec
88.
S3------ O-—-Q
n —
0.04L
>- o 25
o oC£ UJ
xOE 90
____ -Cr
144 192SAMPLE TIME (hr)
5.0
4.5
4.0
3.5
100
50
0
Fig. 18 Continuous addition of Semi 11 on grape juice (18.5°Brix,
pH 3.1) using S. ce.sio.vjj>lac strain 522; yeast count (a), cells
budding (o), yeast productivity (▼), ethanol (a), dilution rate (a),
temperature (□), fermenter productivity (o).
*yeast productivity - molecules ethanol/cell/sec
CE
LLS
BUD
DIN
G (%)
ET
HAN
OL (%
v/v)
TE
MPE
RAT
UR
E ( C
)
89.
^ 0.095
£ 0.085
0.075 -
SAMPLE TIME (hr)
Fig. 19. The relation between fermenter productivity (o) and
dilution rate ( n) (correlation coefficient r = 0.74, significant
at b% level, 5 degrees of freedom) on the continuous addition of
Semilion grape juice (18.5°Brix, pH 3.1) using S.
strain 505.
FER
MEN
TER
PRO
DU
CTI
VIT
Y (g
Et0H
/l/hr
)
90.
?
niafter 144 hr increased the ethanol concentration, however, there appears
to be no effect on the fermenter productivity. This is due to a
reduction in the percentage of cells budding and the yeast count. In
the experiment with strain 522 (Table 14, Fig. 18), an increase in the20
ethanol concentration occurs between 96 and 116 hr, simultaneous with
an increase in fermenter productivity (g EtOH/l/hr) and again a fall
in yeast count. The increased ethanol concentration limited further
yeast activity, and the fermenter productivity remained relatively
constant. These fluctuations were not apparent in the experiment with
strain 505, and an increase in cell count (Table 15) and fermenter
productivity resulted from an increase in dilution rate (Fig. 19). A
positive correlation (r = 0.74, significant at the-5% level for 5 degrees
of freeciom, Appendix 6.12) was obtained between dilution rate and
fermenter productivity for strain 505. Two observations can be made
from this data - firstly, that yeast activity (growth and ethanol
production) will respond to small changes in dilution rate at steady
state, so that an increase in dilution rate will increase growth rate
and yeast productivity. Secondly, as the dilution rate approached the
optimum yeast activity, there was no significant change in productivity;
this is demonstrated more clearly in figure 14 between dilution rates
0.08-0.09 hr~\ Further increases in dilution rate reduced the ethanol
concentration below that necessary for the wine style being produced.
Figure 19 shows that a change in yeast count of strain 505 is preceeded
by an inverse change in % of cells budding. The same correlation is
shown in tables 12 and 16, which further supports the conclusion from
the data in table 11, that the growth rate of each yeast strain is
critically affected by the cell concentration.
91.
0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.0DILUTION RATE (hr'1)
Fig. 20. Effect of dilution rate on ethanol concentration and
fermenter productivity in continuous fermentation of Semi 11 on grape
juice (18.5°Brix, pH 3.1) using S. strain 729 at; 21°C (□,**),
26°C (A, a); ethanol concentration (b, a); fermenter productivity
( □ , A).
ETH
ANO
L (%v/
v)
92.
These experiments show that in a continuous fermenter without internal' #
recycle the maximum equilibrium cell concentrations in fermenting grape
must containing 4-5% EtOH v/v at 26° are: 120, 104, 115, 140 and
75x10^ cells/ml, respectively, for strains 729, 350, 522, 505 and B19.
Sufficient data is available to demonstrate the effect of a 5°C
temperature change on the ethanol concentration and fermenter
productivity for strain 729 (Fig. 20). Steady state data at 21 and
26°C has been taken from tables 12, 14 and 17, and lines have been
fitted to the data points by visual estimation. A 5°C change in
temperature at a dilution rate of 0.07 hr-"* changes the fermenter
productivity by 0.7 g Et0H/l/hr and the ethanol concentration by 1.4% v/v
It is believed that a similar family of curves could be obtained for
each of the yeasts over a wider range of temperatures and dilution
rates. It is important to note that assays for ethanol were made at
24 hr intervals, and although this is acceptable for overall control
of the fermentations that were stable during a 24 hr period, it provides
no information about point changes in yeast activity immediately after
a temperature change.
An experiment was designed to provide further information on the effect
of temperature on the fermenter productivity of strain 729 in the 1
litre fermenter. The temperature of the fermenter was dropped 11 C,
while the dilution rate was held constant; this drop in temperature
took 2 hr due to the inefficiency of the heat exchange system.
^calculated from dry weights (Appendix 6.8)
s L
93.
Table 17. Effect of temperature on fomentation productivity by $. cerevislae strain
729 in the continuous production of fortified sweet wine with continuous addition
of Semilion grape juice (18.5° Brix, pH 3.1).
Sampletime(hr)
Yeast count.;
(cells/ml x 1 $)
Cells
budding(%)
Temp Dilution rate
(°C) (hr"1)
Retention EtOHtime(hr) (%v/v)
Yeast productivity4
(mEtOH/c/S x 107)
Fermenterproductivity (gEt0H/l/hr)
24 145 42 26 0.058 17.2 5.2 5.9 2.38
36 105 50 26 0.056 17.8 4.8 7.3 2.12
43 96 65 26 0.056 17.8 5.0 8.3 2.21
60 75 39 15 0.059 16.9 3.45 7.8 1.60
72 27 72 15 0.046 21.7 1.86 9.0 0.67
84 57 85 20 0.044 22.7 2.25 4.9 0.78
96 105 64 20 0.048 20.8 3.0 3.9 1.13
108 105 48 20 0.042 23.8 3.2 3.6 1 .06
120 96 57 20 0.055 18.1 3.7 6.0 1.60
-fYeast productivity - molecules of ethanol/cel l/'sec
The effect of the temperature drop on yeast growth and ethanol productivity
is shown in table 17 and figure 21. Within 24 hr the fermenter
productivity had fallen from 2.21 to 0.67 g EtOH/l/hr, and the cell
growth was about half that before the change. It was apparent that the
fermentation would washout despite a small reduction in the dilution
rate, and consequently the temperature was increased to 20°C. The
effect on yeast productivity (molecules EtOH/cel1/sec) was not significant
in the first 24 hr, however, due to the method of analysis, point changes
in ethanol production per cell were not apparent.
94.
>- o> tnh- u
Q OO -t~>O' UJ
ZD XoO E
UJ u
SAMPLE TIME (hr)
5
4
3
2
—! o<cdzb-LU
80'CO2i—i
QCDZDCO
LjJCJ
Fig. 21. Effect of temperature on fermenter productivity by S. ceJizvUiaz
strain 729 in the continuous production of fortified sweet wine with
continuous addition of semilion grape juice (18.5°Brix, pH 3.1), yeast
count (A), cells budding (o), yeast productivity (y), ethanol (a),
dilution rate (n), temperature (□), Fermenter productivity (o).
Yeast productivity - molecules ethanol/cel 1/sec.
95.
The yeast productivity was calculated from the average cell concentra
tion during the 12 hr period and the total ethanol produced during
that period.
A good correlation (r=0.86) exists between temperature and the
ethanol concentration in the experiment (Fig 21). Tv/elve hr after the
temperature shock, or 48 hr after commencement of continuous must
addition, cells budding had fallen from 65 to 39% and was presumably
stable at this time. The fall in ethanol concentration after 24 hr
was due to a 72% washout of cells, since the remaining cells continued
to produce ethanol though at a slower rate.
The correlation (Appendix 6.12) between fermenter productivity
(g EtOH/l/hr) and temperature (r=0.75) was significant (at 5% level
with 8 degrees freedom); fermenter productivity reduced from 2.21 to
0.67 g EtOH/l/hr in the 24 hr after the temperature shock. The
fermenter productivity recovered to 1.6g EtOH/l/hr within 48 hr after
the temperature was increased to 20°C; furthermore within 24 hr cellg
count returned to 105x10 cells/ml as a result of budding increasing
to as high as 85% of cells counted.
This experiment adequately demonstrates the importance of temperature
control in a continuous fermenter. If a shortage of grape juice in
a winery meant that a continuous fermenter had to be maintained for
several days before resupply of grape juice, then temperature shock
would be more appropriate to slow the fermentation than a slow or
rapid reduction in dilution rate. In the latter case a build up of
ethanol would occur in the fermenter increasing cell death rate, so
that a fermentation recovery would be slow compared to recovery after
temperature shock (Fig. 21).
96,
5. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS
Each yeast species and strain has a specific growth rate and rate of
ethanol production which can be measured separately in a laboratory
scale continuous fermenter over a range of influencing variables,
such as pH, temperature, ethanol concentration, CO^ pressure,
nutrient status and Brix of the must. In the wine making process
these variables are not always set to optimise yeast growth or
ethanol production rate, but rather to suit quality requirements
for the product. For example,a pH range of 3.1 - 3.6 is desirable
for producing wine with a crisp clean flavour, colour stability and
for reducing bacterial contamination, but this range is not optimum
for yeast activity. In addition, grape juice has a high buffering
capacity, and the pH may not easily be adjusted for optimum yeast
activity without making the wine either too acid or too flat. Similarly,
at the optimum temperature for yeast growth and ethanol production,
the flavour profile of the volatile fermentation by-products may
not be acceptable. Consequently value judgements of wine quality musti
be made before temperature, pH, ethanol concentration and dilution
rate are adjusted for a continuous fermenter.
The preliminary experiments showed that yeast growth and productivity
were decreased by high SO^ and low dilution rates. Low dilution rates
permitted high ethanol concentrations in the fermenter, which further
suppressed fermentation rates, and allowed retention times of up to
80 hr in the fe mien ter.
In batch fermentation Ough (1964) measured fermentation rate by the
disappearance of sugar, however, fermenter productivity (g EtOH/l/hr)
is a more reliable indicator of fermentation rate in a continuous
fermenter.
97.
The low E, during fermentation in a continuous fermenter was demonstrated
by the removal of the brown pigment in Muscat Gordo grape juice.
Continuous and semi-continuous grape juice addition to the fermenter
were compared, and batch additions of grape juice, twice daily, do not
significantly lower the productivity of the fermenter, as only 30% of
the fermenter volume is removed at any time. If single batch additions
to the fermenter are required in a 24 hr period, then the total capacity
of the fermenter must be doubled so that only 30% of the fermenter volume
will be removed. However, 30% removal in 12 hr represents a dilution
rate of 0.025 hr-1 and 30% removal in 24 hr represents a dilution rate
of only 0.013 hr \ and this will correspond to a lower fermenter
productivity. There is no experimental evidence to show that grape juice
additions larger than 30% would not detrimentally affect fermenter
productivity. Toth and Tengerdy (1952) made reference to larger additions,
but no productivity data was presented. The principal reason why additions
larger than 30% detrimentally affect fermenter productivity is that large
quantities of yeast cells are washed out and the ethanol concentration
is diluted, so that contamination by wild organisms is more likely.
The reduction in yeast concentration could be minimized by using a
flocculent strain of yeast which would maintain a high concentration
of cells due to internal recycle. A comparison of the material pro
cessing systems recommended for commercial operation of the two systems,
batch and continuous addition of must, is shown in appendix 6.6.
Five strains of S. were compared under continuous fermentation
conditions and wide variations in cell concentration and growth rate were
observed, and the productivity of the fermenter with the five strains
ranged from 1.2 - 3.4 g EtOH/l/hr, strain 505 showing the highest
productiwity.
98.
Fermenter productivity at 26°C increased with increasing dilution
rate over a particular range of dilution rates for each yeast and
ethanol concentration in the fermenter decreased.
Eschenbruch oX at. (1973) reported that 729, claimed to be an SO^-
forming strain, could produce sulphide from sulphite and sulphate,
and this study supports those findings, although H^S production was
not measured quantitatively.
In the continuous fermentation system, it was demonstrated that fermenter
productivity could be controlled by temperature and dilution rate.
For yeast strain 729 a change in dulution rate from 0.04 to 0.08 hr ^
increased fermenter productivity from 1.57 to 2.59 g EtOH/l/hr.
Similar effects of dilution rate were demonstrated with strains 350,
522, 505 and B19.
A 5°C change in the temperature of fermentation for strain 729 at a~1dilution rate of 0.07 hr changed the fermenter productivity by 0.7
g Et0H/l/hr, which represents an adjustment of 36% (Fig. 20). Similarly/
an 11°C drop in temperature reduced the fermenter productivity from
2.21 to 0.67 g Et0H/l/hr or a 60% reduction (Fig. 21). This method
for restricting a fermentation is preferred to that of nutrient and
substrate limitation if rapid recovery is required at a later time
(Fig. 21).
The cell growth rate was significantly affected by the cell concentration,
and each yeast strain showed a specific equilibrium cell concentration
at steady state.
99.
It is apparent from this data that ethanol inhibition as a bio
chemical inhibitor of yeast activity cannot be simply explained.
Hence, more fundamental work must be carried out at the cellular
level to determine the nature of ethanol inhibition in membrane
transport and metabolic systems. Further data is also needed for
each yeast to extend the temperature and fermenter productivity
profiles over wider ranges of dilution rate and temperature.
The control of product formation is the most important, single aspect
of fermenter productivity control in a continuous fermenter with a
high substrate concentration, such as grape juice. This is in
direct comparison to substrate limited systems, where cell growth
rate can be used to control fermenter productivity. Ethanol
concentration in the fermenter with a known dilution rate is the
best index of fermenter productivity, but continuous ethanol
measurement on an industrial scale requires an auto-analyser or a
gas chromatograph with automatic injection. Sophisticated and expensive
equipment of this nature can only be justified in a large winery and
the estimation of ethanol concentration from the loss of grape sugar
by density, specific gravity or refractive index, is normally used.
Stackhouse (1966) described an inline or vessel mounted, critical angle
refractometer with a synthetic diamond prism for the measurement of
soluble solids in brewer's wort. Currently, Anacon (Anacon Inc.,
Ashland, Massachusetts) have similar equipment available, a Model 47
process analyzer. The main disadvantage of a refractometer is that
the prism surface must be cleaned regularly.
100.
Anton Paar (Anton Paar K.G., A-8054 Graz, Austria) are currently
,marketing a density meter, in which the filled, U-shaped sample tube
is electromagnet!'cally excited to vibrate at its natural frequency;
the resonance is compared to a known standard for density calibration.
The main disadvantage with this or any assay procedure external to the
fermentation vessel is contamination, and the necessary sterile
sampling procedures.
Moller (1975) described an instrument called a Platometer, which is
intended for permanent mounting within a fermenter. The Platometer
is a differential pressure meter, automatically compensated for
temperature variations. The principle of the Platometer is that
hydrostatic pressure between two points in a fermenter is a function
of the vertical distance between the points and the density of the
liquid. Two stainless steel diaphragms, mounted 45 cm apart, sense
the pressures and hydraulically transmit them to a transducer, which
converts the pressure differential into anelectronic signal. This
method of total solids estimation appears to be the most convenient
available and is currently cheaper than the previous methods discussed,
costing less than $2,000 to fully automate measurement in six
fermenters. If the °Brix of grape juice entering the fermenter varies
significantly, it is necessary to compensate for these changes if
ethanol concentration is to be accurately estimated with a Platometer,
as constant ethanol concentration in the fermenter is the critical
factor in maintaining a constant fermentation rate. The next step
in automatic control of a continuous fermenter is to compare the
ethanol concentration with a predetermined set point (ie., 4.5%,
depending on the wine style required), and each time the ethanol
101.
concentration in the fermenter rises above the set point the
dilution rate should be increased to compensate. Similarly,if the
ethanol concentration falls below the set point, dilution rate should
be reduced. Barre and Combe (1975) have described a similar system
for control of a 1 litre laboratory continuous fermenter.
102.
6. APPENDIX
6.1 Glossary
Backmix reactor - fermentation vessel in which any
medium addition is instantly dispersed.
Chemostat - backmix culture vessel in which the
growth rate of the organism is limited
by the supply of a substrate nutrient
Culture
(jj < JU ).
- fermentation broth containing an
organism and substrates necessary
for growth.
Fermentation - an organism uses fermentation catabolic
pathways to derive energy for growth -
may be aerobic or anaerobic.
Fermentation productivity - rate of accumulation of ethanol per
unit volume of the fermenter per hour,
g EtOH/l/hr.
Fermentation rate - rate of accumulation of ethanol or
disappearance of grape sugar per hour,
g/hr.
Mass balance equation - technique used to equate two
simultaneous changes in a measurable
variable; e.g., consumption of
glucose by an organism and disappearance
of glucose from the medium feeding the
organism.
Product-limited reactor - backmix reactor in which the growth
rate of the organism is limited by
product inhibition (ju<^m).
103.
Steady state - assumes constant metabolic rate for
by-product formation and cell reproduction,
by averaging specific yeast activities.
Turbidostat - backmix reactor in which the biomass
is controlled by dilution rate
to =
6.2 Symbols1
X s X » X-j " x^» xn - index of cell mass in a chemostat either
cel 1 s/ml or g cel 1/1.
D - dilution rate, the ratio of mediumL _■]
outflow to chemostat volume V, (hr ).
V - chemostat volume (litres).
F - medium outflow (litres).
P - productivity is either product
concentration, volume or weight,
depending on the type of yield being
um
measured (g/1/hr).
- maximum specific growth rate (hr ^).
m - maximum productivity (g/l/hr).
dxdt - rate of change of cell concentration.
Ks - substrate saturation constant.
Y - yield or weight of organism produced
from a weight of substrate (g/g).
s s s ^* o’ nr - substrate concentration (g/1).- substrate concentration (g/1).
104.
6.3 Sample Calculation for Ethanol Production
Table 18 Yeast productivity in an eleven tank continuous fermenter
(Giashvili and Alkanashvili, 1971).
Tank No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Sugar consumed (%) 0.8 2.1 2.5 3.0 2.9 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.6 1.5 0.1
Ethanol (%v/v) 0.44 1.16 1.38 1.66 1.61 0.88 0.78 0.67 0.88 0.83 0.05
Yeast count
(cell s/mlxl0G) 38 92 106 75 71 70 65 59 58 52 48
Yeast productivity
(molecul es
EtOH/cellxlO14) 1.19 1.8 0.1
Note. It was assumed that 1.8g sugar produces 1 ml EtOH (Amerine and
molecules EtOHJoslyn 1970) which is equal to 0.79 x 6.0238 x 10
(Appendix 6.7).46
105.
6.4 Schematic Representation of Grape Juice Preparation for a
Continuous Fermenter.
batch addition_ grapes
T enzyme & so2
V'WyI 9raPecrusher
ethanol
continuousfermentercontinuous
rA dejuicerbentonite
continuouspress/\/\/
settling tank r
settling settlingtank
XXX rotating beater
Fig. 22. Comparative schematic diagrams showing different grape
handling procedures for batch and continuous addition of grape
juice to a continuous fermenter.
6.5 Removal of Sulphur Dioxide from Grape Juice
The stoichiometric oxidation of sulphur dioxide to the sulphate ion
is shown in the following reactions.
106.
SO2 + ^2^*2 —* ^2^4............
g mol wt. 64 34
g in soln. 120 x
Solving for x,
x = PMIP = 63_75 g ^
28g = 100 ml H„02 (28% w/w)
63.75g = x
(a)
Solving for y,y = JP,0x|3...75 = 227 ml H ^ (28% w/w)
Hence .227 ml/1 of cone. H^O^ (28% w/w) are required to neutralize
120 mg/1 S02
2HS03~ + H202 — 2H2S04 + 2e~
g mol wt. 162 34
g in soln. 120 x
Solving for xs
x = = 25.18 g H202
28g = 100 ml H202 (28% w/w)
25.18g = y ml
Solving for y,
y = ■100*-^-.1i = 89.9 ml H202 (28% w/w)
Hence 0.089 ml/1 of cone. H202 are required to neutralize 120 mg/1 S02.
107.
The quantity of hydrogen peroxide required depends on the form or the
oxidation state of sulphur in its dissociated form in solution. A
series of test additions of were added to the grape juice and the
residual SO^ levels are shown in Table 7.
108.
6.6 Schematic Diagrams of Five Continuous Fermenters (Peynaud, 1967).
~vn i. _i. 1
“ :r~r. —yLadousse fermenter iwith two
concentric columns
2. Ladousse fermenter constructed with o siri<jle column
3. Defranccschi fermenter shown during recycling period with automa ic sediment discharge system (ricjht)
4 Padovan fermenter with the recycling system (right) and sediment discharge (left)
5. V/co fermenter incorporating spritik- fer system for washing the sediment
109.
6* 7 Derivation of Productivity Formula
6.71 Yeast Productivity
Total weight of ethanol produced in 1 hr is:
%EtOH in the fermenter x ml (wine output) x 0.79 g
where ml wine output Dhr"' x 900 and conversion ratio for
EtOH v/v to w/v is 0.79. The number of molecules of EtOH in Ig w/v
is:
6.0238 x 1023 46
ie. Avagadro's number divided by the g molecular wt EtOH. The3
number of seconds in one hr is 3.6 x 10 and yeast count is measured asr
cells/ml x 10 . Hence yeast productivity molecules EtOH/cel1/sec
(m.EtOH/c/s) is:
(%EtOH x D x 900 x 0,79 ) x (6.0238 x 1023)3.6xl03 x 900 x cells/ml x 106 46
Sample calculation for 5% EtOH at 0 = 0.03 hr" , v = 900 ml andr
110 x 10 cell s/ml; yeast productivity is
„ (5 x 0.03 x 900 x 0. 79 ) x (6.0238 x IQ23) molecules EtOH/cel1/sec3.6 x 103 x 900 x 110 x 106 46
= 3.9 x 10^ molecules ethanol/cell/sec.
6.72 The Ethanol Productivity of the 1 litre Fermenter
The total weight of ethanol produced in 1 hr is Et0H% v/v x ml (wine output)
x 0.79 g ie. where ml wine output is Dhr"^ x 900 and conversion ratio for
EtOH v/v to w/v is 0.79. Hence ethanol productivity in g Et0H/l/hr is;
% EtOH x Dhr"1 x 0.79 x 10
where the factor 10 converts % EtOH w/v to Et0H/l w/v.
Sample calculation for 5% EtOH at D = 0.03 hr" :
Fermenter Productivity = 5 x 0.03 x 0.79 x 10 g Et0H/l/hr
1.1 g Et0H/l/hr.
no.
6.8 Biomass Determination for Yeast Strain 505
The method for biomass determination for strain 505 was dry weight
measurement of a 10 ml sample of the fermenting must after washing
twice and centrifuging before incubation at 105°C for 12 hr.
Other methods available were - incubation, after centrifuging,
in a desiccator and acid hydrolysis of the sample, to break up the
floes, prior to counting in an haemocytometer. The second alternative
was chosen to relate yeast dry weights (the method used) to cell count,
however, this method has the inherent problem of prematurely
separating mother and daughter cells and giving an artificially
high cell count. A 10 ml sample of fermenting must was treated with
10, 20 and 30 ml of 0.02M H9S0^ and the 10 ml addition was found most
suitable as some daughter cells were attached to the parent cell
and the floes were broken sufficiently to spread evenly in an
haemocytometer slide. A series of ten duplicates was conducted on
the must at the end of the fermentation and the results are shown
in table 19. The average dry wt, 6.91 mg cel 1 s/10 ml sample or
0.69 g/1, is equivalent to 70 x 10^ cells/ml, hence 1 g cells/1
(dry wt) is equivalent to 102 x 106 cells/ml.
in.
Table 19. A comparison between cell dry weights (incubated at 105°C
for 12 hr) and direct cell count by an haemocytomer slide after acid
hydrolysis (10 ml 0.02M H^SO^ per 10 ml of must) of a yeast floe
in a must sample containing the strain UCD 505.
Samplenumber
Dry weight (mg cel 1/10 ml)
Yeast count
(cells/mlxl0^)
Samplenumber
Dry weight (mg cel 1/10 ml)
Yeast count (cells/mlxlO^
1 7,1 69 6 7.4 78
2 6.7 68 7 7.2 74
3 6.9 70 8 6.6 69
4 7.1 72 9 6.3 77
5 6.9 63 10 6.9 71
6.9 Preparation of Yeast for Electron Microscopy
Yeast cells, which collapse during the usual preparation of samples
for scanning electron microscopy, were dried by critical-point
drying. (Kurtzman, Baker and Smiley, 1974).
6.10 Identification of Wild Yeast Types
All media preparations were standard commercial preparations found
in Difco or Oxoid handbooks and were prepared by staff in the School
of Food Technology, UNSW.
The following media were inoculated with the wild yeast incubated on
lysine medium at 25°C.
112.
a) Sporulation media: V-8 juice agar, Acetate agar, Gorodkowa agar.
Incubate for 2 weeks, checking at 3, 7 and 14 days for spore
formation.
b) Liquid Malt Extract 15%. Check after 3-4 days incubation for
pellicle, ring and sediment formation. Then shake the tube and
examine a wet amount under the microscope. Record the following:
cell morphology (eg spheroidal, ovoidal, elongate, cylindrical,
apiculate, ogival etc.); thallus (cells single, in pairs, chains,
clusters, pseudomycelium, true mycelium etc.). Replace the tube and
examine for pellicle etc. again after 2 weeks.
c) Sugar Fermentation Tubes: glucose, galactose,sucrose, maltose,
lactose, raffinose and melibiose. Observe after one week for gas
production.
d) Carbon Assimilation Auxanogram: Suspend a loopful of yeast from
the agar slant into a tube containing 3.0 ml of sterile water. Pour
into petri dish and mix evenly with melted yeast nitrogen base agar
(this medium has no carbon source). After setting aseptically place
on the agar surface very small discs of filter paper which have been
impregnated with a 20% w/v sugar solution. The sugars tested will
be glucose (control) galactose, sucrose, maltose, lactose, raffinose,
melibiose, melizitose and a methyl-D-glucoside. Incubate and record
growth around the discs.
e) Nitrogen Assimilation Auxanogram. Prepare a plate as for Carbon
Assimilation but use yeast carbon base agar (this medium has no
nitrogen source). After setting, place very small quantities of
peptone, ammonium sulphate, and potassium nitrate on the plate.
Incubate and note growth around each source.
113.
f) Pseudomycelium formation: Inoculate your yeasts in two parallel
lines on a corn meal agar plate. Cover part of the inoculated area
with a sterile cover slip and observe the various morphological
features under the microscope after 5-10 days.
These results were collated and the key to genera was used to identify
the yeast to the genus Rkod.oton.ula 4pp. The assistance of
Dr. Graham Fleet is gratefully acknowledged.
6.11 Key to the Yeast Genera
The key has been prepared in collaboration with Dr. N.J.W. Kreger-van
Rij.
1. a. Vegetative reproduction exclusively by cross wall formation
without constriction
S dvLzoAac.cka/iomyc£A
b. Vegetative reproduction exclusively by cells formed on stalks
StesiigmatomyceA
c. Vegetative reproduction in a different way 2
2. a. Vegetative reproduction by unipolar budding
PttijAoAponuin
b. Vegetative reproduction by bipolar budding 3
c. Vegetative reproduction by multilateral budding; true
mycelium, arthrospores and bal1istospores may also occur 6
3. a. Fermentation absent
S ckizo6£a4 to 6ponton
b. Glucose is fermented 4
4. a. Ascospores are formed 5
b. Ascospores are not formed
KlocckcAa
5.a. Ascospofes cap-shaped
114.
WZckesdiamia
b. Ascospores spherical, warty, brown
Nad^onla
c. Ascospores spherical, smooth, hyaline, conjugating in pairs
in the scus
SacchctAomycodeA
d. Ascospores hat- or helmet-shaped, or seemingly globose with
an indistinct ledge, not conjugating in pairs
HanictvLaAposia
6. a. Ballistospores are formed 7
b. Ba11istospores are not formed 9
7. a. Mycelium with clamp connections
Spotu.diobolLtt>
b. Mycelium may be present, but there are no clamp connections 8
8. a. Bal1istospores asymmetrical; carotenoid pigments
usually produced
SpoAoboloinyces.s
b. Bal1istospores symmetrical; no carotenoid pigments produced
BuZteAai
9. a. Some of the vegetative cells are triangular
. . TAlgonopA-iA
b. Vegetative cells are not triangular 10
10. a. Cells frequently "ogival"; strong acetic acid
production from glucose; characteristic aroma; cells on
malt agar short-lived 11
b. The correlation of characterisecs as mentioned under a.
does not occur 12
11. a. Asospores are formed
Vckke.A a
115.
b. Ascospores are not formed
Bsidt£anomyc&>
12. a. Ascospores are formed 13 •
b. Asocspores are not formed 28
13. a. Nitrate is assimilated 14
b. Nitrate is not assimilated 16
14. a. Hat-shaped ascospores are formed in a globose compartment
at the distal end of a usually tube-shaped ascus
PachyAolzn
b. The ascus has a different shape 15
15. a. Ascospores are spherical with a warty wall
Citatiomycz,6
b. Ascospores are hat- or Saturn-shaped
Hani umita
Endomycop&dA
16. a. The ascus is a sack-like (bursiform) protuberance on a
vegetative cell, spores have a light amber to brown colour
LLpomyceA
b. The ascus is different 17
17. a. An abundance of true mycelium, and budding cells are
produced
Endomyc.op6'U>
b. True mycelium scarce or absent 18
18. a. Ascospores needle-shaped; one or two spores per ascus
MeX6 ctwZkouilcL
b. Ascospores fusiform; more than two spores per ascus 19
116.
c. Ascospores large, oval to cylindrical; growth between o30-40 C and only in complex media with gaseous CO^ present;
occurrence confined to the digestive tract of rabbits and certain
other rodents
SacchaJwmycop&'U
d. Ascospores spherical to oval, warty with an equatorial
ledge
SduoanniomyceA
e. Ascospore different shape 20
19. a. Ascospores with a whip-like appendange
N&mato6potia
b. Ascospores without a whip-like appendage
CocdldicuscLLi,
20. a. Asci easily ruptured, liberating the spores 21
b. Asci not easily ruptured 23
21. a. Ascospores spherical or oval 22
b. Ascospores hat- or Saturn-shaped
Vlckla.
c. Ascospores reniform
KZuyveAomyc.ej>
22. a. Vigorous fermentation of glucose
KluyveAomyczA
b. Fermentation of glucose weak, slow or absent
PZclvia
23. a. Ascospores spherical or oval 24
b. Ascospores large, oblong with obtuse ends
LoddoAomyc.&>
c. Ascospores oblate-ellipsoidal or lentiform: light brown
WZngea
117.
24. a. Vigorous fermentation of glucose 25\
b. Fermentation of glucose slow, weak or absent 26t25. a. Early formation of a pellicle on malt extract
PZchZa
b. No early formation of a pellicle on malt extract
Sac.cJicuwmij£(U>
26. a. Ascospores smooth
PlcJUa
b. Ascospores warty 27
27. a. Conjugation immediately preceding ascus formation
Vz.ban.yomyc.zA
b. No conjugation immediately preceding ascus formation
Plchla
28. a. Multilateral budding on a broad base combined with
septation; no arthrospores
OoAponUdium
b. Multilateral budding, true mycelium and arthrospores
TnUcJioAponon
c. Multilateral budding; true mycelium present or absent,
no arthrospores 29
29. a. Budding cells and true mycelium with dark-coloured
telospores; clamp connections may or may not be present;
pseudomycelium present or absent 30
b. Budding cells; pseudo- and (or) true mycelium may be
formed; dark-coloured teleospores or clamp connections are not
present 31
30. a. Streak culture pink due to carotenoid pigments;
no fermentation
Pkod.oAposiLcU.Luri
118.
If inositol is not assimilated see also
RhodotoAuZa (strains of Rk. giuiiniA)
If inositol is assimilated, see also
CayptococcuA (strains of Oi. in^iamoniniaia)
b. Streak culture not pigmented; fermentation absent
or present
Lcuco A po xidium
31. a. Streak culture pink or yellow due to carotenoid
pigments; no fermentation 32
b. Streak culture not pigmented; fermentation absent
or present 34
32. a. Inositol is assimilated
CfllJptO COCCLiA
b. Inositol is not assimilated 33
33. a. Starch-like compounds are not formed
RkodotoAuZa
Starch-like compounds are formed
Yeast-like forms of Taplv\ina
34. a. Budding cells and pseudomycelium always present;
true mycelium present or absent
Candida
b. Pseudomycelium absent or rudimentary; no true mycelium 35
35. a. Inositol is assimilated; no fermentation
OiyptOCOCCUA
b. Inositol is not assimilated; fermentation present or
absent
ToAuZopAiA
119.
6.12 Calculation of Correlation Coefficient
The correlation (r) between two viariables x, y was calculated
from the following formula,
£y.y( -
( *x)
) (£y -(1^)
n
Degrees of freedom = n-1
Significance levels were read from tables of standard distribution.
120.
7. BIBLIOGRAPHY
t
Aiba, S., A.E. Humphrey and N.F. Millis. 1973. Biochemical
Engineering. 2nd Ed. University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo.
Ainerine, M.A. 1955. Controlled fermentations. Amer. J. Enol.
Viticult. 6(2), 1-16.
Amerine, M.A. 1959. Continuous flow production of still and
sparkling wine. Wines & Vines 40 (5), 41-2.
Yx Amerine, M.A. 1963. Continuous fermentation of wines. Wines &
Vines 44 (S), 27-9.
Amerine, M.A., and M.A. Joslyn. 1970. Table Wines. The Technology
of their Production. 2nd Ed. University of California Press,
Berkeley.
Amerine, M.A., and R.E. Kunkee. 1968. Microbiology of winemaking.
Ann. Rev. Microbiol. 22, 323-58.
Amerine, M.A., and C.S. Ough. 1964. Studies with controlled
fermentation. VIII. Factors affecting aldehyde accumulation
Amer. 0. Enol. Viticult. 15, 23-33.
Amerine, M.A., and C.S. Ough. 1972. Recent advances in enology.
Crit. Rev. Fd. Techno!. 2, 407-516.
Amerine, M.A., and C.S. Ough. 1974. Wine and Must Analysis.
John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York.
Amerine, M.A., H.W. Berg and W.V. Cruess. 1972. The Technology
of Winemaking. Avi Publishing Co., Inc., Westport, Connecticut.
Anderson, R.J., and G.A. Howard. 1973. The production of hydrogen
sulphide by yeast and by ZymonaA anaasiobia. J. Inst. Brew. SO,
245-51.
Anon. 1970. Procede de vinification continue. Bull. Technol.
Inform. No. 246, 47-63.
121.
Ante!iff, A.J. 1976. Variety identification in Australia.i
Aust. Winemaker & Grapegrower No. 153, 10-11.
Avakiants, S.P., and I.D. Belousova. 1965. Activity of 8-fructofuranosidase
in continuous flow conversion of wine to champagne. Prik.
Biokh. Mikrobiol. 1, 57-65.
Bajenov, P.D. 1969. Apparatus B A-l for the continuous fermentation
of grape must (trans). Vinodelie i Vinograd. SSSR. 4, 42-46.
y. Barre, P., and P. Combe. 1975. Un fermenteur de laboratoire pour
1'etude de la fermentation alcoholique continue a masse volunique
constante des jus de raisin. Revue des Fermentations et des
Industries Alimentaires 30 [3], 67-72.
Beesch S.C. and G.M. Shull. 1956. Fermentation. Ind. Eng. Chem.
48, 1585-1603.
Brenner, M.W., M. Karpiscak, H. Stern, W.P. Hsu. 1970. Differential
medium for detection of wild yeast in the brewery. Amer. Soc.
Brew. Chem. Proc., 79-88.
Brokhorov, B.N., and B.N. Alekandrovskii. 1952. Automatic regulation
of tank fermentation (trans). Vinodelie i Vinograd. SSSR. 11,
20-3.
Brugirard, A., 0. Roques and E. Vignier. 1970. La vinification continue
en Roussillon. Observations sur le campagnes 1969 et 1970 et sur
la maitnise des temperatures. Bull. Technol. Pyrennes Oriental
No 56, 85-118.
Brusilovskii, S.A. 1957. Continuous champagnization of wine (trans).
Izobretatel 'stvo v SSSR. 2 [11], 36-38.
Brusilovskii, S.A. 1963 a. Amelioration du procede de la cnampagnisatiori
due vin en continu. Bull. O.I.V. 36, 319-40.
122.
Brusilovskii, S.A. 1963 b. Essai Industrie! du procede de la
champagnisation du vin en continu. Bull. O.I.V. 36, 206-17.
Brusilovskii, S.A., M.A. Gagarin and N.G. Sarishvili. 1974.
Champagnization of wine in a single-vessel system (trans).
Vinodelie i Vinograd. SSSR. 1, 14-17.
Burrows, S., and R.R. Fowell. 1964. Die Verwendung eines neuen
hefestammes zur hers tel lung von backhefe. German Pat. 1166131
and 1166132 Mar. 26.
Buryan, N.I., U.V. Kozlovsky and U.S. Razuvaev. 1975. Effect of
ethanol on the specific growth rate of wine yeasts (trans).
Vinodelie i Vinograd. SSSR. 3, 25-8.
Buryan, N.I., U.V. Kozlovsky, G.D. Vodozez and V.Z. Orehanov. 1973.
Production of wine by continuous fermentation of grape must under
CO^ (trans). Vinodelie i Vinograd. SSSR. 7, 18-21.
Clarke, P.H. 1976. Mutant isolation, pp. 15-28. 2nd Int. Symp. on
the Genet. Ind. Micro organisms. K.D. Macdonald (ed). Academic
Press, London.
Cootes, R.L.,and T.H. Lee. 1977. Laboratory construction of a steam
sterilizable probe for dissolved oxygen in wine. Aust.
Grapegrower and Winemaker (in press).
Cowland, T.W., and D.R. Maule. 1966. Some effects of aeration on the
growth and metabolism of Saadv&iomyceA ccAeufz>Zae. J. Inst.
Brew. 72, 480-8.
Cremaschi V.M. 1951. Continuous fermentation process. USA Patent
2536993 (Jan 2nd).
123.
Day, A.W., N.H. Poon and G.G. Stewart. 1975. Fungal fimbriae.
III. The effect on flocculation in ScLcckasiomyaeA. Can. J.
Microbiol. 27, 558 - 64.
Deibner, L. 1957. Modifications du potentiel oxydoreducteur
au cours de 1'elaboration des vins de differents types.
Ann. Techno!. Agr. 6, 313-45.
Denison, F.W., I.C. West, M.H. Peterson, and J.C. Sylvester. 1958.
Large scale fermentations. A practical system for pH control.
Ind. Eng. Chem. 50, 1259-62.
Dott, W., M. Heinzel and H.G. Truper. 1976. Sulphite formation by
wine yeasts I. Relationships between growth, fermentation and
sulphite formation. Arch. Microbiol. 107, 289-92.
Drawert, F., A. Rapp, and W. Ulrich. 1965a. Bi1 dung von apfelsaure,
weinsaure und Bernsteinsaure durch verschiedene hefen.
Naturwissenschaften 52, 306.
Drawert, F., A. Rapp, and W. Ulrich. 1965 b. Ueber Inhaltsstoffe
von mosten und weinen. VI. Bildung von hexanol als
stoffwechselprodukt der weinhefen sowie durch reduction von
hexen-2-al-l wahrend der hefegarung. Vitis 5, 195-8.
Drobny, S. 1976. Classical and modern methods of sparkling wine
production. Vinohrad. 74(2), 40-1.
Dunn, C.G. 1955. Recent developments in the field of industrial
microbiology and their possible impact on brewing technology.
Amer. Soc. Brew. Chem. Proc. 65-79.
Dzhanpoladyan, L.M., A.M. Sambelyan, A.C. Sogomonyan, K.T. Hachatryan,
and K.B. Martirosyan. 1974. Continuous sherry production from
wine using autolyzed yeasts (trans). Biologicheskii Zhurnal
Armenii. 27 (S'), 23-8.
124.
Dzhurikyants, N.G., L.A. Konovalova, E.V. Lubovina, and M.E. Goryaev.I
1974. Change in alcohols in continuous champagnization (trans).
Vinodelie i Vinograd. SSSR. 5, 19-21.
Ephrussi, B. 1953. Nucleo-Cytoplasmic Relations in Micro-organisms.
Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
Eschenbruch, R., and P. Bonish. 1976. The influence of pH on sulphite
formation by yeasts. Arch. Microbiol. 107, 229-31.
Eschenbruch, R., F.J. Haasbroek and J.F. de Villiers. 1973.
On the metabolism of sulphate and sulphite during the fermentation
of grape must by SacchoAomjcu coAtviAiaa. Arch. Microbiol. 93,
259-66.
Fiechter, A. 1973. Continuous cultivation of yeasts, pp. 97-131.
In: Methods in Cell Biology, Vol XI, Yeast Cells. D.M. Prescott
(ed). Academic Press, New York.
Field, G.J.,and C.G. Dunn. 1957. New process control applications
in fermentation. Ind. Eng. Chem. 49, 1215-20.
Filippov, B.A. and K.H. Dzhurikyants. 1974. Projected apparatus
and technology for continuous manufacture of champagne (trans).
Vinodelie i Vinograd. SSSR. 1, 11-3.
Flanzy, M., P. Dupuy, C. Poux, and P. Andre. 1966. Fermentation du
jus de raisin en continu. Etudes de laboratoire. Ann. Technol.
Agric. 15, 311-20.
Flanzy, M., C. Poux, P. Dubois, P. Dupuy. 1968. Fermentation du mout
de raisin en continu. Formation des alcools superieurs.
Ann. Technol. Agric. 17, 207-215.
Fornachon, J.C.M. 1963. Inhibition of certain lactic acid bacteria
by free and bound sulphur dioxide. J. Sci. Fd. Agric. 14,
857-62.
125.
Gelencser, J., and P. Sarkany. 1970. A sopnoni folyamatos
voros borerjeszto berendezes ertekelese. Borgozdasag. H,
64 - 8.
Gerasinovich, G., A.A. Merzhanian and S.A. Brusilovskii. 1962.
Method of champagnizing wine in a continuous stream and
installation for same (trans). USA patent No. 3,082,653.
Giashvili, D.S. 1961. Rezul'taty Opytov po Corzheniiu susla' v
potoke. (p73). Voprosy biokhimii Vinodeliia Moscow Pishchepromfzdat.
Giashvili, D.S., and V.G. A1kanashvi1i, 1971. State of yeasts during
the continuous fermentation of grape must (trans). Gruzinskii
Nauchno - Issle Dovatelskii Istitut Pischevoi Promyshlennasti Trudy.
. Moscow, No. 5, 6-15.
Gilyadov, M.G. 1968. Selection of a dosing system in continuous
fermentation of must (trans). Vseoiuznyi Nauchno - Issledovatelskii
Institut Pivu - Bezalkogolnoi i Vino Delcheskoi Promyshlennosti
Trudy. Moscow, 169-76.
Glenister, P.R. 1973. Some staining procedures for the examination
of Brewers' yeast. Amer. Soc. Brew. Chem. Proc. 34-6.
Griffin, S.R., and I.C. MacWilliam, 1969. Variation of ceil wall
content in flocculent and non flocculent yeast strains.
J Inst. Brew. 75, 355-58.
Guetovy G. 1969. Qualite des vins prodiyiits par le procede de ■ Y$
fermentation continue. Bull. O.I.V. 42, 505-13.
126
Heinzel, M. and H.G. Truper. 1976. Sulphite formation by wine
yeasts II. Properties of ATP-sulfurylase. Avch. Microbiol.
107, 293-97.
HT Holzberg, I., R.K. Finn, and K.H. Stienkraus. 1967. A kinetic study
alcoholic fermentation of grape juice. Biotechnol. Bioeng.
9, 413-27.
Horecker, B.L. 1963. Pentose metabolism in bacteria. John Wiley &
Sons Inc., New York and London.
Hough, J.S. and A.H. Button. 1972. Continuous brewing. Progress
in Industrial Microbiol. 11, 91-132.
Johnson, M.J. and J. Borkowski. 1967. Long lived steam sterilizable
membrane probes for dissolved oxygen measurement. Biotechnol.
Bioeng. 9, 2-6.
Johnson, J.R. and C.W. Lewis, 1976. Genetic analysis of flocculation in
SaacliatomyceA and tetrad analysis of commercial brewing
and baking yeasts, pp. 339-355. 2nd Int. Symp. on Genet. Ind.
Microorg. K.D. MacDonald (ed). Academic Press, London.
Joslyn, M.A. and R. Dunn. 1938. Acid metabolism of wine yeasts. I.
The relation of volatile acid formation to alcoholic fermentation.
J. Amer. , Chem... Soc. 69,1137-41.
Kato, S. 1967. Measurement of infectious wild yeasts in beer by
means of crystal violet medium. Bull. Brew. Sci. (Tokyo) 13, 19-24.
Kieyn, J. and.J.S. Hough, 1971. The microbiology of brewing. Ann.
Rev. Microbiol. 25, 583-608.
\P of the
127
Kovalevsky, K.A., A.I. Anoshin and V.Z. Orehanov. 1973. Equipment
for continuous production of dry wines (trans). Vinodelie ii
Vinograd. SSSR. 5, 42-4.
Kozenko, E.M. 1953 a. Continuous method for champagnizing wine (trans).
Vinodelie i Vinograd. SSSR. 5, 14-19.
Kozenko, E.M. 1953 b. Fermentation system under continuous wine flow
conditions (trans). Vinodelie i Vinograd. SSSR. 9, 22-8.
Kunkee, R.E. 1976. A rapid procedure for viable yeast cell detection
with a single fluorescent dye. Wines & Vines. 57(7), 36.
Kunkee, R.E. and M.A. Amerine. 1970. Yeasts in Wine-making. In The
Yeasts III Rose A.H. and J.S. Harrison (eds) Academic Press, London.
Kunke^, R.E. and C.S. ,0ugh. 1966. Multiplication and fermentation of
SacchcvcomyceA ztnaviAioLQ. under carbon dioxide pressure in wine.
Appl. Microbiol. 14, 643-48.
Kunkee, R.E. and R. Singh. 1975. Dehydrogenase activity for higher
alcohols in cell free extracts of SacchaAomycej, ccAeociXac.
J. Inst. Brew. 81, 214-17.
Kurtzman, C.P., F.L. Baker and M.T. Smiley. 1974. Specimen holder
to critical-point dry microorganisms for scanning electron
microscopy. Appl. Microbiol. 28, 708-12.
Ladousse, G. 1962. Vinification continue et automatique. Vignes et
Vins. No. 115, 11-3.
Laszlo, E. 1969. Continuous fermentation of white wine (trans).
Borgazdasag. 17, 90-1.
Lerner, H.R. and A.M. Mayer. 1976. Reaction mechanism of grape catechol
oxidase - a kinetic study. Phytochem. 15, 57-60.
Lerner, H.R., A.M. Mayer, E. Harel. 1972. Evidence for conformational
changes in grape catechol oxidase. Phytochem. 11, 2415-21.
128
Lin, Y. 1975. Detection of wild yeasts in the brewery, efficiency
of differential media. J. Inst. Brew. 81, 410-17.
Lodder, J. 1970. The Yeasts: A Taxonomic Study. 2nd ed. North
Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam.
Lodder, J. and G. Loggers. 1962. Process for the manufacture of bread
with the aid of yeast. '.USA Pat. 3394008. July 23.
Lyons, T.P. and J.S. Hough,- 1970. Flocculation of brewers' yeast.
J. Inst. Brew. 76, 564-71.
Martakov, A.A. 1970. Winemaking by prolonged fermentation (trans).
Vinodelie i Vinograd. SSSR. 7, 19-20.
Maxon, W.D. 1955. Microbiological process report; continuous
fermentation. Appl. Microbiol. 3. 110-22.
Merzhanian, A.A., S.A. Brusi1ovskii, N.G. Sarishvili, Z.N. Kishkovsky,
I, Bronshtein, and M.A. Gagarin. 1975. Apparatus for wine
champagnization in a continuous stream. USA Patent. No. 3,916,775.
Mi el, P.0. 1966. Phosphomannans and other components of flocculent
and non flocculent walls of Sac.ckaAomtjcdA ceAcvf^ae. J. Gen.
Microbiol. 44, 329-41.
Mi Hi pore. 1969. Yeast detection kit, Prod. Bull. YDK-1. Mi 11 i pore
Corp., Bedford, Mass.
Minarik, E. and A. Navara. 1974. Effect of sulphate and sulphur
amino acid levels on sulphite and sulphide formation by wine
yeasts. Ann. Microbiol. 24, 21-36.
Moller, N.C. 1975. Continuous measurement of wort/beer extract in
a fermenter. Master Brew. Assoc. Amer. Tech. Quarterly. 12(1),
41-5.
Monod, J. 1942. Recherches sur la croissance dec cultures bacteriennes.
Hermann Paris.
129
Monod, J. 1950. La technique de culture continue, theorie et
applications. Ann. Inst. Pasteur, Paris. 79, 390-410.
Mosiashvili, G.I. and I.D. Shalutashvi1i. 1971. Yeast hybrids for wine
making. Vinodelie i Vinograd. SSSR. 3, 19-20.
Mueller, R. 1976. Influence of yeast strain on H^S formation as measured
with the sulphide electrode. Wines & Vines. 57(7), 36.
McMurrough, I. and A.H. Rose. 1967. Effect of growth rate and substrate
limitation on the composition and structure of the cell wall of
Saccha/iomyceJ) ceAcuY^ac.. Biochem. J. 105, 189-203.
Nagodawithana, T.W. and K.H. Steinkraus. 1976. Influence of the rate
of ethanol production and accumulation on the viability of
SaachaMomycQyS ceAcux^Aae, in "rapid" fermentations. Appl. and
Environ. Microbiol. 31(2), 158-62.
Nagodawithana, T.W., C. Castellano, and K.H. Steinkraus. 1974. Effect
of dissolved oxygen, temperature, initial cell count, and sugar
concentration on the viability of Sacchcvionujcaa in
"rapid" fermentations. Appl. Microbiol. 2S[3), 383-91.
Novick, A. and L. Szilard. 1950 a. Description of the chemostat.
Science. 112, 715-6.
Novick, A. and L. Szilard. 1950 b. Experiments with the chemostat on
spontaneous mutations of bacteria. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. US. 36,
708-19.
Nurimen, I., E. Oura and H. Suomalainen. 1970. Enzymic composition
of the isolated cell wall and plasma membrane of bakers V yeast.
Biochem. J. 116, 61-9.
130
Oprya, A.P. 1969. Vitamins in grape must during continuous fermentation
(trans). Sodovod. Vinograd. i Vinodelie, Moldavia. 24[12], 26-8.
Oreshkina, A.E., V.N. Novicova, U.P. Onochov and M.A. Kotchurenko. 1974.
Improved technology of Soviet champagne (trans). Vinodelie i
Vinograd. SSSR. 4, 22-6.
Ough, C.S. 1964. Fermentation rates of grape juice. I. Effect of
temperature and composition on white juice fermentation rates.
. Amer. J. Enol. Viticult. 75, 167-77.
Ough, C.S. 1966 a. Fermentation rates of grape juice. II. Effect of
initial Brix, pH, and fermentation temperature. Amer. J. Enol.
Viticult. 77, 20-6.
Ough, C.S. 1966 b. Fermentation rates of grape juice. III. Effects of
initial ethyl alcohol, pH, and fermentation temperature. Amer. J.
Enol. Viticult. 77, 74-81.
Ough, C.S. and M.A. Amerine. 1958. Studies on aldehyde production
under pressure. Amer. J. Enol. Viticult. 9, 111-22.
Ough, C.S. and M.A. Amerine. 1968. Continuous fermentation of grape
juice. Mitt. Rebe. Wein, Ser. A. (Klosterneuburg) IS, 428-39.
Oura, E. 1976. The effect of aeration intensity on biochemical
composition of bakers yeast: Activities of enzymes of the glycolytic
and pentose phosphate pathways. Biotechnol. Bioeng. IS, 415-20.
Paronetto, L. 1966. Ruolo Del 1'ossiegno in enologia ; dal la vinigicazione
all imbottigliamento. Corso Nazionale di Aggiornamento par Enotecnici
“G. Gattista Cerletti." 2, 285-313.
Paul, F. 1963. Sur la teneur des vines en reductones naturelles et leur
influence. Ann. Techno!. Agr. 12, 171-6.
Peni, C., C. Pompei, G. Montedoro and C. Cantarelli. 1971. Maderisation
of white wine. I. Influence of pressing on the susceptibility of the
grapes to oxidative browning. J. Sci. Fd. Agric. 22, 24-8.
131
Peynaud, E. 1939. Sur la formation et la diminution des acides volatils
pendant la fermentation alcoholique en anaerobiose. Ann. Ferm.
5, 321-327.
Peynaud, E. 1967. Winemaking by continuous fermentation. Process
Biochem. 2(72), 44-6.
Peynaud, E. and G. Guimberteau. 1962. Sur la formation des alcohols
superiers par les levures de vinification. Ann. Technol. Agr.
77, 85-105.
Peynaud, E. and G. Guimberteau. 1969. La vinification continue.
Industrie Agrarie. 7, 223-36.
Pirt, S.J. 1975. Principles of Microbe and Cell Cultivation.
Blackwell, Scientific Publications. Oxford,
du Plessis, C.S. 1975. Fermentation formed compounds in relation to
wine quality, (p 374-93). 4th Int. Enological Symp., Valencia,
Spain, (transcripts) E. Lemperle and J. Frank (eds). Int. Assoc.
Modern Wine Technol. Management.
Portno, A.D. 1968 a. Continuous fermentation of brewers' wort.
J. Inst. Brew. 74, 55-63.
Portno, A.D. 1968 b. Continuous Fermentation in relation to yeast
metabolism. J. Inst. Brew. 74, 448-56.
Power, D.M. and S.W. Challinor. 1969. The effects of inosital deficiency
on the chemical composition of the yeast cell wall. J. Gen.
Microbiol. 55, 169-76.
Preobrazhenskii, A.A. 1961. Nepreryvnoe brozhenie susla v gorizontal-nom
apparate pri proizvodstve sukjikj i desertnykh vin. (p 70-72)
Voprosy Biokhisnii Vinodeliia. Moscow, Pishchempromizdat. 242 p.
Preobrazhenskii, A.A. 1962, Prigotovlenie Kheresa v potoke. Moscow,
PaviIon.
132
Rankine, B.C. 1963. Nature, origin, and prevention of hydrogen
sulphide aroma in wine. J. Sci. Food Agr. 14, 79-91.
Rankine, B.C. 1967. Formation of higher alcohols by wine yeasts, and
relation to taste thresholds. J. Sci. Food Agr. IS, 583-9.
Rankine, B.C. and K.F. Pocock, 1970. Alkalimetric determination of
sulphur dioxide in wine. Aust. Wine, Brewing Spirit Rev. 88, 40-4.
Rankine, L.C., O.C.M. Fornachon and D.A. Bridson. 1969. Diacetyl in
Australian dry red wines and its significance in wine quality.
Vitis 8, 129-34.
Reed, G. and H.J. Peppier. 1973. Yeast Technology. The Avi
Publishing Co. Inc. Westport, Connecticut.
Remy, R.H. 1967. Introduction a 1 etude de las vinification continue.
Vignes et Vins No. 160, 49-53.
Ribereau-Gayon, P. 1963. Application a la vinification de levures
metabolisant l*acide malique. Compt. Rend. Acad. Agr. France.
48, 555-60.
Ribereau-Gayon, P. 1975. Mechanisms of must oxidation before fermentation,
(pp. 325-33). 4th Int. Enological Symp., Valencia, Spain. (Transcripts)
E. Lemperle and J. Frank (eds) Int. Assoc. Modern Wine Techno!.
Management.
Ribereau-Gauon, P., E. Peynaud, and M. Lafon. 1956. Investigations
on the origin of secondary products of alcoholic fermentation.
Amer. 0. Enol. Viticult. 7, 53-61.
Rice, A.C. 1974. Yeast fermentation in wine technology. New York
State Experimental Station, Special Report No. 8, 14-16.
Rice, J.F. and O.R. Helbert. 1974. The quantitative influence of
agitation on yeast growth during fermentation. Amer. Soc. Brew.
Chem. Proc. 32(2), 94-6.
Richards, M. 1970. Detection of yeast contaminants in pitching
yeast. NtJol W^s.tien Comm. 33(110 J, 11-15.
133
Richards, M. and F.R. Elliot. 1968. Freeze-drying characteristics of
< Sac<ihaJiomyc<i6 ceand Sacck. uvaJum. Antionie van
Leeuwenhoek, J. Microbiol. Serol. 34, 227-33.
Ricica, J. 1973. Continuous cultivation of , microorganisms. Folia
Microbiol. 18, 418-48.
• Ricica, J. 1974. Continuous cultivation of microorganisms. Folia
Microbiol. 19, 430-31.
Ricketts, R.W. and J.S. Hough. 1961. Influence of aeration on
production of beer by continuous fermentation. J. Inst. Brew.
67, 29-32.
Riddell, J.L. and M.S. Nuri. 1958. Continuous fermentation of wine
at Vie-Del. Wines & Vines 39 (5), 35.
Rogers, P.L.. 1976. Computer control of fermentation processes.
Pace 29(H), 29-33.
Sandegren, E. and L. Enebo. 1961. Biochemical aspects of continuous
fermentation. Wallerstien Comm. 24 l[85), 269-77.
Sapis-Domerq, S. 1969. Comportement des levures apiculees au cours
de la vinification. Connais Vigne Vin 3, 379-92.
Semichon, L. 1926. Nouveau procede de vinification par fermentation
continue. Revue de Viticutt. No. 65, 21-7, 41-3, 53-9, 71-9.
Sols, A., C. Garicedo and G. DelaFuent. 1970. Energy-yielding metabolism
in yeasts, pp. 271-307. In The Yeasts. II. A.H. Rose and J.S.
Harrison (eds). Academic Press, London.
Stackhouse, G.E. 1966. Refractometric gravity control in the brewhouse.
Master Brew. Assoc. Amer. Tech. Quarterly 3(1), 27-33.
y Steinkraus, K.H. 1972. Studies on continuous production of wine
and flor sherry, p. 258. 4th Int. Fermentation Symp. Abstracts.
Kyoto, Japan.
134
Streiblova, E. 1963. Surface structure of yeast protoplasts.
J. Bacteriol. 95, 700-7.
Suomalainen, H. and E. Oura. 1970. Yeast nutrition and solute uptake,
pp. 3-74. In The Yeasts, II. A.H. Rose and J.S. Harrison (eds).
Academic Press, London.
Suomalainen, H., E. Oura and P. Nevalainen. 1965. What happens when a
yeast cell dies? p 67. Federation European Biochem. Soc., 2nd
Symp., Abstr. Commun.
Tarantola, C. and A. Gandini. 1966. La microflora lievitiforme nella
vinificazione continua. Atti. Accad. Ital. Vite Vino IS, 43-62.
Thoukis, G. and L.A. Stern. 1962. A review and some studies on the
effect of sulphur on the formation of off odours in wine. Amer.
J. Enol. Viticult. 15, 133-40.
Toth, J.& R. Tengerdy. 1952. Continuous fermentation experiments (trans).
Yearbook Inst. Agr. Chem. Technol., Univ. Tech. Sci. Budapest.
3, 114-25.
Traverso-Rueda, S. and V.L. Singleton. 1973. Catecholase activity in
grape juice and its implications in winemaking. Amer. J. Enol.
Viticult. 24, 103-9.
Wainwright, T. 1971. Production of H^S by yeasts: role of nutrients.
J. Appl. Bact. 34(7), 161-71.
Warkentin, H. and M.S. Nury. 1963. Alcohol losses during fermentation of
grape juice in closed containers. Amer. J. Enol. Viticult.
14, 68-74.
Watson, T.G. and J.S. Hough. 1966. Studies in continuous fermentation.
I. Effects of yeast concentration. J. Inst. Brew. 72, 547-55.
135
Weeks, C.E. 1969. Production of sulphur dioxide-binding compounds and
of sulphur dioxide by two Sacdici'iomtjczA yeasts. Amer. J. Enol.
Viticult. 20, 32-9.
Wejnar, R. 1968. Untersuchungen'ube'r die bedeutung der weinsaure’ fur die
wasserstoffionenkonzentration des traubenweines. Mitt. Rebe u.
Wein, Obstbau u. Fruchteverwertung (Klosterneuberg) IS, 349-58.
Wellhoener, H.J. 1954. Ein kontinuierliches gar-und reifungsverfahren
fur bier. Brauwelt. 44, 624-6.
White, B.B. and C.S. Ough. 1973. Oxygen uptake studies on grape juice.
Amer. J. Enol. Viticult. 24, 148-52.
Whiting, G.C. 1975. Organic acid metabolism of yeast during
fermentation of alcoholic beverages - A Review. J. Inst. Brew.
S2, 84-92.
Wiame, J.M. and E.L. Dubois. 1976. The regulation of enzyme synthesis
in arginine metabolism of SacchaJtomycQA c.eAeofz>fae. pp. 391-406.
2nd Int. Symp. on the Gene T. Ind. Microorganisms. K.D. MacDonald (ed).
Academic Press, London.
Wildenradt, H.L. and M.J. Lewis. 1969. Production of hydrogen sulphide
by yeast. Amer. Soc. Brew. Chem. Proc. 32, 113-22.
Wiley, A.J. 1954. Food and Feed Yeast in Industrial Fermentation.
2nd ed. (pp. 307-43) L.K. Underkofler and R.J. Hickey (eds) Vol. I.
Chem. Publishing Co., New York.
Willig, M. 1950. Wine now made continuously. Food Industries 22,
1184-5.