Date post: | 04-Dec-2023 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | independent |
View: | 0 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Accepted Manuscript
Title: Conversion of non-allosteric methylglyoxal synthaseinto a homotropic allosteric enzyme by C-terminal deletion
Author: Malihe Mohammadi Shekufeh Zareian KhosroKhajeh
PII: S1381-1177(14)00144-1DOI: http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.molcatb.2014.04.022Reference: MOLCAB 2948
To appear in: Journal of Molecular Catalysis B: Enzymatic
Received date: 29-8-2013Revised date: 25-4-2014Accepted date: 30-4-2014
Please cite this article as: M. Mohammadi, S. Zareian, K. Khajeh, Conversionof non-allosteric methylglyoxal synthase into a homotropic allosteric enzymeby C-terminal deletion, Journal of Molecular Catalysis B: Enzymatic (2014),http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcatb.2014.04.022
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication.As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript.The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proofbefore it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production processerrors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers thatapply to the journal pertain.
Page 1 of 27
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
1
Conversion of non-allosteric methylglyoxal synthase into a homotropic allosteric enzyme by C-terminal deletion
Malihe Mohammadi1*, Shekufeh Zareian2* and Khosro Khajeh1†
1 Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
2 Department of Biological Sciences, Institute for Advanced Studies in Basic Sciences, Zanjan, Iran
Running Title: Effect of C-terminal deletion on EMGS properties
* These authors contributed equally to this work.
†Corresponding author: Khosro Khajeh, Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of biological
Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, P.O. Box 14115-175, Tehran, Iran. Tel/Fax; +98-21-
82884717; E-mail: [email protected]
Page 2 of 27
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
2
Abbreviations:
EMGS: E.coli Methylglyoxal Synthase
TMGS: Thermus sp. GH5 Methylglyoxal Synthase
DHAP: Dihydroxyacetone Phosphate
Highlights
EMGS-∆C revealed homotropic cooperative behavior
EMGS-ΔC is more flexible and less stable compared to wild-type
EMGS C-terminal tail plays an important role in allosteric behavior
Page 3 of 27
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
3
Abstract
Our previous study revealed that the Hill coefficient of E. coli methylglyoxal synthase (EMGS)
is higher than what we have calculated for MGS from Thermus sp. GH5 (TMGS). Amino acid
sequence alignment of EMGS and TMGS shows that key residues of allosteric pathways in
EMGS exist in TMGS as well, except Arg150 which plays a crucial role in forming a salt bridge
with Asp20 in the neighboring subunit and consequently transfers the allosteric signal between
the subunits. To equalize allosteric pathway in EMGS with TMGS, ten amino acid residues,
containing Arg150, are omitted from the EMGS C-terminal tail. The resulting recombinant
enzyme (EMGS-∆C) surprisingly shows homotropic cooperative behavior in presence of
dihydroxyacetone phosphate. Structural studies and irreversible thermoinactivation data shows
EMGS-ΔC is not only more flexible but also less stable compared to wild-type EMGS. These
data suggest EMGS C-terminal tail may play an important role in allosteric behavior and stability
of wild-type EMGS and thus indicating that the homotropic cooperatvity is arisen by binding of
the substrate which pushes the pre-existing equilibrium between the relatively inactive (RI) and
relatively active (RA) conformations.
Keywords: E. coli methylglyoxal synthase; Allosteric pathway; Hill coefficient; Cooperativity.
Page 4 of 27
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
4
1. Introduction
Allostery, or a “distinct site”, is the regulation of enzyme activity between two separated sites [1-
3]. All allosteric proteins are either oligomeric or contain multiple interacting domains within
one polypeptide chain [4, 5], and display homotropic or heterotropic cooperativity in ligand
binding and a characteristically sigmoidal dependence of reaction velocity on substrate
concentration [5]. Two models have been advanced to explain the binding properties of allosteric
ligands [6, 7]. In contrary to the classical view, the allosteric perturbation does not necessarily
arise from binding a ligand but any type of alteration in the protein could commence allosteric
signals [5, 8-12]. However, there are a lot of oligomeric enzymes which have not cooperative
behavior and exhibit standard Michaelis-Menten kinetics [8, 13].
Methylglyoxal synthase (MGS, EC 4.2.3.3) catalyzes an elimination reaction which converts
dihydroxyacetone phosphate (DHAP) to methylglyoxal (MG) and phosphate [14, 15]. MGS is a
homohexameric enzyme, and phosphate inhibits it allosterically. This could suggest a role for
this enzyme under phosphate deficiency condition [16]. For the wild-type MGS in the presence
of phosphate, cooperativity emerges between active sites upon substrate binding [17]. Although,
this enzyme has been purified from different sources, but MGS from E. coli (EMGS) has been
studied the most. EMGS gene is composed of 459 bp which encodes a polypeptide of 152 amino
acids with a molecular mass of 17 kDa [18]. The three dimensional structure of EMGS has been
determined by Saadat et al [19]. Sequence alignment with MGS from several bacterial species
indicates the absolute conservation of several amino acid residues: Asp 20, Asp 71, Asp 91, Asp
101, Arg 107, His 19, His 98 and Lys 21 [20]. Site-directed mutagenesis study suggests that Asp
71, Asp 101 and His 98 are involved in the enzyme catalysis [20]. According to the reported
crystal structures two pathways have been proposed through which EMGS transmits the
Page 5 of 27
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
5
allosteric information. In the first pathway, formation of a salt bridge between Asp 20 and Arg
150 in the presence of phosphate passes information between the six adjacent subunits. In the
second putative mechanism, Pro 92, Arg 107, and Val 111 are employed in this conveyance [19].
Recently, a gene encoding MGS from Thermus sp. GH5 (TMGS) was cloned, expressed [21] and
protein structure was studied by X-ray crystallography (PDB code 2XW6) [A. Shahsavar et al.
Unpublished results]. The amino acid sequence comparison of TMGS and EMGS enzymes has
shown 66% similarity. Sequence analysis has revealed that amino acids 143–152 which form the
C-terminal helix in EMGS are not present in TMGS (Fig. 1). TMGS has a lower cooperativity in
presence of phosphate than EMGS [21], thus the absence of Arg 150 in TMGS, comparing to
EMGS, has caused a decrease in the cooperativity between the enzyme subunits [21, 22].
Construction of this pathway by addition of a ten-residual sequence at the carboxy terminus of
TMGS increased the cooperative function of the enzyme [23]. Here to investigate the importance
of the mentioned C-terminal sequence role in the salt bridge formation and transmitting the
allosteric signal, ten amino acid sequence containing crucial Arg for salt bridge formation, were
omitted from the C-terminus of EMGS. In this way we are trying to equalize this enzyme to
TMGS. The new enzyme was called EMGS-∆C. The apparent decrease in nH of EMGS-∆C was
expected, but the results show that the enzyme is behaving like a homotropic cooperative
enzyme in absence of phosphate, which means EMGS-∆C kinetic data are sigmoidal with respect
to substrate concentration. In the current study we are investigating the possible cause of
emergence of the new allosteric behavior in EMGS in consequence of this deletion. For this
reason thermal stability and changes in secondary and tertiary structures of these enzymes are
investigated by circular dichroism (CD) and fluorescence spectroscopy.
Page 6 of 27
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
6
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Chemicals
T4-DNA ligase and restriction enzymes were purchased from Fermentas Life Science (Vilnius,
Lithuania). Oligonucleotides were synthesized by Macrogen Inc Company (Korea). Tryptone
and yeast extract were purchased from Liofilchem (Roseto degli Abruzzi, Italy).
Dihydroxyacetone phosphate was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (USA). 2,4-
Dinitrophenylhydrazine and other chemicals were obtained from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany).
2.2. Cloning of E. coli MGS (EMGS)
Genomic DNA from Escherichia coli was prepared using DNA extraction kits. The EMGS gene
was amplified from genomic DNA by PCR using the following primers: forward (5′-
GGAATTCCATATGGAACTGACGACTCGCACTTTACC-3′) and reverse (5′-
CGCAAGCTTTTACTTCAGACGGTCCGCGAGATAAC-3′) to introduce the flanking NdeI
and HindIII restriction sites (the underlined bases specify the NdeI and Hind III restriction sites
in forward and reverse primers, respectively). The resulting fragment (459 bp) digested with
NdeI and HindIII and ligated into similarly digested pET-21a(+) vector using T4 DNA ligase.
Sequence integrity was confirmed by DNA sequencing.
2.3. Construction of EMGS-∆C plasmid
EMGS-∆C gene, (EMGS gene minus 30 bp at 3´-end) was constructed by using pET-21a(+)
plasmid containing the EMGS gene as a template. 0.08 µM forward (5´-
GGAATTCCATATGGAACTGACGACTCGCACTTTACC-3´) and reverse (5´-
Page 7 of 27
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
7
CGGAAGCTTTTAATCTGGGATCAGAATATCGACCGCG-3´) primers were used to amplify
EMGS-∆C, the other conditions are as explained in previous part. The resulting fragment (429
bp) digested with HindIII and NdeI and ligated into similarly digested pET-21a(+) vector using
T4 DNA ligase. Sequence integrity was confirmed by DNA sequencing.
2.4. Protein expression and purification
E. coli BL-21 cells harboring each of recombinant plasmids were grown in Luria–Bertani (LB)
medium supplemented with ampicillin (100 µg/mL) at 37 °C, 220 rpm. IPTG (1mM) was added
to the culture medium once the culture reached an optical density of 0.5 to 0.7 at 600 nm.
Subsequently, temperature was lowered from 37 to 30 °C suitable for production of adequate
amount of protein. After 19 hours, cells were harvested by centrifugation at 5000 rpm for 20 min
and resuspended in lysis buffer containing 2 mM imidazole, 100 mM NaCl and 50 mM Tris (pH
7.0). The suspension was subjected to sonic disruption and total lysate was centrifuged for 20
min at 12000 rpm at 4 °C. The supernatant was dialyzed against 20 mM Tris buffer, pH 8.0 to
apply onto a Q-Sepharose equilibrated with the same buffer. Proteins were eluted with a linear
gradient of NaCl (0-1 M) prepared in 20 mM Tris buffer (pH 8.0). The flow rate was set at 3
mL/min, and fractions containing MGS activity were collected. The purity of proteins was
confirmed by SDS-PAGE according to the method of Laemmli [24]. Protein concentration was
measured by Bradford method [25], using bovine serum albumin as standard.
2.5. Enzyme assay and kinetic characterization
The spectrophotometric assay of Hopper and Cooper [26] was used to determine the enzyme
activity. Briefly, 125 µL of 50 mM imidazole buffer (pH 7.0), 10 µL DHAP (15.625 mM) and 10
µL (16.8 ng) of the enzyme were incubated at 60 °C for 5 min. Then 0.1 mL of the mixture was
Page 8 of 27
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
8
added to 0.33 mL of 2,4-dinitro-phenyhydrazine reagent (0.1 % 2,4-dinitro-phenyhydrazine in 2
mM HCl) and followed by mixing with 0.9 mL of distilled water. After incubation in 30 °C for
15 min, 1.67 mL NaOH (10 % w/v) was added and the appeared purple color was measured at
550 nm after a further 15 min incubation. A molar extinction coefficient of 4.48 × 104 M-1 cm-1
was used to calculate the methyglyoxal concentration [16, 27].
Kinetic parameters measurements were carried out using different substrate concentrations (1-2.5
mM). Mixtures containing different concentrations of DHAP with no enzyme were used as
controls and each data point (initial velocity) was determined in triplicate. Steady-state kinetic
parameters in the presence and absence of phosphate were fitted to Michaelis-Menten equation
and were numerically analyzed by Lineweaver-Burk equation. Hill coefficient was calculated
from the fallowing equation:
Log [v/ (Vmax – v)] = nH log[S] – log (K´)
Where v and Vmax are velocity and maximal velocity of the enzyme, and nH is the Hill
coefficient. K´ is related to Km but also contains terms related to the effect of substrate occupancy
at one site on the substrate affinity of the other sites. According to this equation, the value of nH
can be calculated by plotting log [v/ (Vmax – v)] against log[S].
2.6. Intrinsic fluorescence and acrylamide quenching experiments
Tryptophan fluorescence of EMGS and EMGS-∆C was measured using a Perkin Elmer
luminescence spectrometer LS 55. Samples were excited at 280 nm and the emission was
recorded between 300 to 400 nm. All experiments were carried out at room temperature and
protein concentrations were 20 μM in 20 mM Tris buffer (pH 8.0). For quenching measurements,
different concentrations of acrylamide varying from 0 to 200 mM were obtained from a stock of
Page 9 of 27
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
9
acrylamide (1 M). After 5 min incubation with acrylamide, samples were excited at 280 nm and
the emission spectra were scanned between 300-500 nm. According to Stern-Volmer equation,
the fluorescence intensity at λmax of emission was analyzed:
Fο/F = 1 + Ksv [Q]
In this equation Fο and F are the fluorescence intensities at the emission Amax in the absence and
presence of quencher, [Q] is the quencher concentration, and Ksv is the quenching constant [28].
2.7. Circular dichroism measurements
Far-UV spectra (190-260 nm) were recorded on a Jasco spectropolarimeter J-715 (Tokyo, Japan)
using 1 mm path length quartz cell at the protein concentration of 0.2 mg/mL in 20 mM Tris
buffer (pH 8.0). Results are presented as molar ellipticity [θ] (deg cm2 dmol−1), based on a mean
amino acid residue weight of 110 for EMGS. The molar ellipticity [θ] was calculated from the
formula [θ]λ = (θ × 100MWR)/ (cl), where c is the protein concentration in mg/mL, l the light
path length in centimeters, and θ is the measured ellipticity in degrees at wavelength λ.
2.8. Irreversible thermoinactivation
Thermal inactivation of EMGS and EMGS-ΔC was investigated in 50 mM imidazole buffer (pH
7.0) at 60 and 65 °C. Periodically, after chilling on ice for 30 min, the residual activity of
enzymes were measured as described above. The untreated sample was used as a control (100%
activity).
Page 10 of 27
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
10
3. Results
3.1. Kinetic properties of EMGS-ΔC in comparison with wild-type EMGS
E. coli MGS (EMGS) and EMGS-ΔC genes were cloned, expressed and the enzymes purified on
a Q-Sepharose column at pH 8.0, as described in the methods section. These two enzyme
variants were dialyzed in Tris-HCl, pH 7.0 and then were used to determine the kinetic
parameters and Hill coefficients using Prism software version 5.04 (available at
www.graphpad.com). (Fig 2). The Hill coefficient and kcat/Km for the mutant variant in absence
of phosphate were 1.30 and 1.58, respectively, whereas these values for the wild-type were 1.0
and 8.43 (Table 1). These data indicate that the EMGS-ΔC variant is showing homotropic
cooperative behavior in absence of phosphate. Furthermore Hill coefficients of the mutant and
wild-type EMGS were determined in some different concentrations of phosphate (Table 2). Data
exhibit nH of the mutant enzyme in each concentration of phosphate, is decreased in comparison
with the native enzyme. Within ten residues deleted from EMGS’s C-terminus there is no
conserved residue or any directly involved residue in EMGS catalysis [18] (Fig. 1), but the C-
terminal α-helix makes interactions with the active site of the neighboring subunit [19, 20]. We
can conclude that probable loss of these interactions in the mutant enzyme have some effects on
the catalytic inefficiency. Also previously in the case of E. coli ornithine transcarbamoylase,
Dembowski et al reported that conferral of cooperative behavior to this enzyme was associated
with the reduction in its catalytic efficiency [29]. On the other hand the deleted sequence
contains an Arg (No. 150) which in the presence of phosphate forms a salt bridge with both Asp
20 and phosphate ion [19], so probably its deletion and lack of these interactions in EMGS-ΔC,
can be the cause of decreased Hill coefficient in presence of phosphate in comparison with native
enzyme (Table 2).
Page 11 of 27
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
11
3.2. Looser structure of EMGS-∆C is evident by fluorescence data
Further insights on structural changes induced by C-terminal deletion, arise from the differences
in fluorescence emission of mutant and wild type enzymes. The emission spectrum of a protein is
related to its aromatic residues, such as tryptophan and tyrosine, and it is strongly affected by the
microenvironment surrounding these fluorophores. Any structural alteration which changes the
position of these residues in a protein, can affect their emission spectrum as well. Therefore, it is
possible to indirectly follow the conformational changes of the protein through its intrinsic
fluorescence emission. Less structural compactness leads to decrease in the intensity of
fluorescence. As shown in Fig.3 A, a decrease in fluorescence intensity is observed upon ten
amino acid deletion from EMGS, so it can be proposed that C-terminal deletion has caused the
weakening of intersubunits interactions. But a more closely look into the mentioned C-terminal
sequence (143-YQRYLADRLK 152) shows that two tyrosine residues exist in this sequence. So
these two residues are absent in EMGS-ΔC and the decrease in fluorescence intensity may be the
effect of this absence. For measuring the structural flexibility and integrity of enzymes’ structure,
we performed fluorescence quenching assay using acrylamide [28]. The Stern-Volmer plots for
acrylamide quenching of wild-type EMGS and EMGS-ΔC are shown in Fig.3 B. The quenching
constants (Ksv values) for wild-type and EMGS-ΔC were calculated and found to be 1.67 and
2.16 (M-1), respectively. It is evident in the data that the EMGS-ΔC mutant is effectively
quenched by acrylamide. This could be indicative of more flexibility of EMGS-ΔC than wild-
type, which lets the tryptophan residues be readily accessible to acrylamide. This data confirms
fluorescence emission measurements.
Page 12 of 27
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
12
3.3. Circular dichroism spectra of EMGS and EMGS-ΔC
To evaluate the changes in the secondary structure of enzymes, far-UV CD measurements were
carried. The far-UV CD spectra of EMGS shows a slightly decrease in negative ellipticity upon
ten residue deletion which indicates a lesser secondary structure content in this mutant (Fig.3 C),
as we mentioned in the previous sections C-terminal residues are in the α-helix structure.
3.4. Deletion of C-terminal tail from EMGS lowered the thermal stability
Thermal inactivation of purified EMGS and EMGS-ΔC was performed in support of the
fluorescence spectroscopy data. The residual activity of enzymes after incubation at 60 °C
(optimum temperature of wild-type EMGS) [S. Zareian et al. Unpublished results] and 65 ºC was
measured to assess their thermal stability. As depicted in Fig.4 A, after heat treatment for 120
minutes at 60 °C, wild-type and EMGS-ΔC retained nearly 40% and 25% of their initial activity.
But after 60 minutes of incubation at 65 ºC, EMGS-ΔC loses its activity totally, whereas 15% of
initial activity of wild-type enzyme still remains (Fig.4 B). Taken together with fluorescence
data, it could be concluded that EMGS-ΔC is not only more flexible but also less stable than
wild-type EMGS.
Page 13 of 27
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
13
4. Discussion
The vital role of allostery is evident by various processes in the cells which are regulated by
allosteric proteins including metabolic and signal transduction pathways [3, 4, 30, 31,] Allostery
is cooperative event, positive or negative; up- or down- regulating protein functions [32]. All
dynamic (non-fibrous) proteins are potentially allosteric [32, 33]. Thousands of studies over
years have provided two types of examples of allosteric proteins; those that lose their
cooperativity [29, 31] and those which gain cooperative behavior upon changes induced by
structural and/or dynamic alterations [5, 8-12]. In the present study, it is demonstrate that a ten
residue deletion from C terminus of an oligomeric enzyme could be sufficient to trigger an
allosteric pathway in the enzyme.
There is an idea that proteins should be considered as a dynamic ensemble of conformational
states [34]. Allostery derives from populations and redistribution of the conformational ensemble
[33-36]. In the case of non-allosteric proteins, they are probably to be allosteric if modified by
any structural perturbation (i. e., mutations) or proper ligands. Mutations or ligands can facilitate
the transition of the protein from one conformation to another [2, 33, 37, 38]. This is so-called
‘‘new view’’ of allosteric transitions, that often referred to as the ‘‘population-shift’’ model [3,
33, 39, 40]. The model emphasizes that the activated conformation (i.e., the dominant
conformation after the allosteric transition) has a non-negligible population prior to activation,
and that the allosteric event (i.e., homotropic or heterotropic binding) shifts the pre-existing
equilibrium between the low- and high-activity conformations toward the latter which is now
relatively more stable [38-44]. Therefore, the shift in the pre-existing ensemble can lead to
different observed conformational dynamic and functional effects [40, 43].
Page 14 of 27
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
14
In the case of MGS, removal or disruption of some interactions in the interface of subunits
converts the active form of EMGS (form A) with the tightly bound subunits to a loosely bound
form which is relatively inactive (RI form) and results in a cooperative enzyme. It is proposed
that RI form of the enzyme is in equilibrium with the relatively active (RA) form and homotropic
cooperatvity is arisen by binding of the substrate which pushes this equilibrium towards RA form
[10, 22]. In reality, ligand binding destabilizes a conformation (RI form) favoring another
conformation (RA form) [4].
In summary, here for the first time we study the effect of C-terminal deletion on cooperative
behavior of EMGS and data exhibits that the enzyme is showing cooperative behavior in absence
of its allosteric ligand (phosphate). Fluorescence study and quenching assay using acrylamide
show that the overall structural compactness of EMGS-ΔC has decreased in comparison with the
wild-type. Also thermal inactivation data confirms that EMGS-ΔC is less stable compared to
wild-type EMGS. A key requirement for allostery is protein flexibility. Flexibility is a property
common to most proteins and links structure to function by allowing the communication between
very distant parts of a macromolecule [3, 4, 44]. Taken together our study is a good evidence for
the fact that enzymes are in a dynamic equilibrium between active and inactive conformation and
allosteric enzymes have such a potential structure which any modification in them can cause a
new allosteric behavior in response to their substrates or maybe new ligands, once they receive
the precondition for initiation of the allosteric pathway.
Nevertheless further evidence and more detailed structural studies (i.e., crystallographic studies)
are required to help to explain what interaction(s) are omitted or likely which new interaction(s)
between protein subunits are formed by ten residue deletion from EMGS. Furthermore systemic
Page 15 of 27
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
15
deletions and point mutations at the C-terminal tail of EMGS are needed to determine which
amino acid(s) in this region are directly responsible to create an allosteric enzyme.
Page 16 of 27
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
16
Acknowledgments:
We would like to thank the research council of Tarbiat Modares University for the financial
support during the course of this project.
Page 17 of 27
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
17
Refrences
[1] C. J. Tsai, A. del. Sol, R. Nussinov, J. Mol. Biol. 378 (2008) 1–10.
[2] N. M. Goodey, S. J. Benkovic, Nat Chem Biol. 4 (2008) 474-482.
[3] R. A. Laskowski, F. Gerick, J. M. Thornton, FEBS Letters. 583 (2009) 1692–1698
[4] A. Peracchi, A. Mozzarelli, Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1814 (2011) 922–933.
[5] N. S. Scrutton, M. P. Deonarain, A .Berry, R. N. Perham, Science. 258 (1992) 1140-1143.
[6] J. Monod, J. Wyman, J. P. Changeux, J. Mol. Biol. 12 (1965) 88–118.
[7] D. E. Koshland Jr., G. Nemethy, D. Filmer, Biochemistry. 5 (1966) 365–385.
[8] L. C. Kuo, I. Zambidis, C. Caron, Science. 245 (1989) 522-524.
[9] J. W. Stebbins, E. R. Kantrowitz, Biochemistry. 31 (1992) 2328-2332.
[10] Y. Ikeda, T. Tanaka, T. Noguchi, J. Biol. Chem. 272 (1997) 20495-20501.
[11] B. Santamaria, A. M. Estevez, O. H. Martinez-Costa, J. J. Aragon, J. Biol. Chem. 277
(2002) 1210-1216.
[12] Z. Farsi, H. Pein, M. Pazhang, S. Zareian, S. O. Ranaei-Siadat, K. Khajeh, J. Biochem.152
(2012) 531-538.
[13] H. Uchikoba, S. Fushinobu, T. Wakagi, M. Konno, H. Taguchi, H. Matsuzawa, PROTEINS:
Structure, Function, and Genetics. 46 (2002) 206–214.
[14] R. A. Cooper, A. Anderson, FEBS Lett. 11 (1970) 273-276.
Page 18 of 27
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
18
[15] R. A. Cooper, Annu Rev Microbiol. 38 (1984)49-68.
[16] D. J. Hopper, R. A. Cooper, Biochem J. 128 (1972) 321-329.
[17] G. T. Marks, M. Susler, D. H. Harrison, Biochemistry. 43 (2004) 3802-3813.
[18] D. Saadat, D. H. Harrison, Biochemistry. 37 (1998) 10074-10086.
[19] D. Saadat, D. H. Harrison, Structure. 7 (1999) 309-317.
[20] D. Saadat, D. H. Harrison, Biochemistry. 39 (2000) 2950-2960.
[21] M. Pazhang, K. Khajeh, S. M. Asghari, H. Falahati, H. Naderi-Manesh, Appl Biochem
Biotechnol. 162 (2010) 1519-1528.
[22] H. Falahati, M. Pazhang, S. Zareian, N. Ghaemi, R. Rofougaran, A. Hofer, A. R. Rezaie, K.
Khajeh, Protein Eng Des Sel.26 (2013) 445-452.
[23] S. Zareian, K. Khajeh, M. Pazhang, B. Ranjbar, BMB reports. 45 (2012) 748-753.
[24] U. K. Laemmli, Nature. 227 (1970) 680-685.
[25] M. M. Bradford, Anal. Biochem. 72 (1976) 248-254.
[26] D. J. Hopper, R. A. Cooper, FEBS Lett. 13 (1971) 213-216.
[27] R. A. Cooper, Methods Enzymol. 41 (1975) 502-508.
[28] M. R. Eftink, Biophys J. 66 (1994) 482-501.
[29] N. J. Dembowski, C. J. Newton, E. R. Kantrowitz, Biochemistry. 29 (1990) 3716-3723.
[30] Fenton, A. W, Trends Biochem Sci. 33 (2008) 420- 425.
Page 19 of 27
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
19
[31] S. A. Berger, P. R. Evans, Nature. 343 (1990) 575-576.
[32] C. J. Tsai, A. d. Sol, R. Nussinov, Mol. BioSyst. 5 (2009) 207–216.
[33] K. Gunasekaran, B. Ma, R. Nussinov, Proteins: Struct. Funct. Bio inf. 57 (2004) 433–443.
[34] N. Popovych, S. Sun, R. H. Ebright, C. G. Kalodimos, Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 13 (2006)
831–838.
[35] S. Bettati, C. Viappiani, A. Mozzarelli, Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1794 (2009) 1317–1324.
[36] C. Rivetti, A. Mozzarelli, G.L. Rossi, E.R. Henry, W.A. Eaton, Biochemistry. 32 (1993)
2888–2906.
[37] W. A. Eaton, E. R Henry, J. Hofrichter, A. Mozzarelli, Is cooperative oxygen binding by
hemoglobin really understood? Nat Struct Biol. 6 (1999) 351–358.
[38] E. R. Henry, S. Bettati, J. Hofrichter, W. A. Eaton, A tertiary two-state allosteric model for
hemoglobin. Biophysical Chemistry. 98 (2002) 149–164.
[39] C. Qiang, M. Karplus, Protein Sci. 17 (2008) 1295–1307.
[40] M. S. Formaneck, L. Ma, Q. CuiReconciling, Proteins. 63 (2006) 846–867.
[41] S. Kumar, B. Ma, S. J. Tsai, N. Sinha, R. Nussinor, Protein Sci. 9 (2000) 10-19.
[42] D. Kern, E. R. P. Zuiderweg, Curr Opin Struct Biol. 13 (2003) 748- 757.
[43] A. del. Sol, C. J. Tsai, B. Ma, R. Nussinov, Structure. 17 (2009) 1042–1050.
[44] A. Ansari, J. Berendzen, S. F. Bowne, H. Frauenfelder, I. E. Iben, T. B. Sauke, E.
Shyamsunder, R. D. Young,Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 82 (1985) 5000–5004.
Page 20 of 27
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
20
Figure legends
Fig.1. Amino acid sequence alignment of Thermus sp. GH5 MGS (TMGS) and E. coli enzyme
(EMGS) shows 66% similarity. TMGS do not possess the ten amino acids compared to EMGS in
both terminals.
Fig. 2. Michaelis-Menten curves of (●) EMGS and (■) EMGS-∆C as a function of DHAP and
phosphate concentration
Fig.3. (A) Fluorescence emission spectra of EMGS (―) and EMGS-∆C (----) at 280 nm
excitation wavelength. (B) Stern-Volmer plot of fluorescence quenching by acrylamide.
Fluorescence quenching at 25 ºC for (●) EMGS and (■) EMGS-∆C enzymes. (C) Far-UV CD
spectra of EMGS (―) and EMGS-∆C (----). The experiments were performed in triplicate.
Fig.4. Thermal stability of the (●) EMGS and (■) EMGS-∆C at (A) 60 °C and (B) 65 °C.
Experiments were performed at least in triplicate and the standard deviations were within ±5% of
the experimental values.
Page 21 of 27
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
21
Table 1. Kinetic parameters of EMGS and EMGS-ΔC.
a Km for EMGS-ΔC is K0.5
b nH for EMGS and EMGS-ΔC are in absence of phosphate.
Enzyme Km (mM)a kcat (s-1) kcat/Km nHb
EMGS 2.74 ± 0.5 23.12 ± 0.2 8.43 1.0 ± 0.08
EMGS-ΔC 1.35 ± 0.5 2. 14 ± 0.5 1.58 1.30 ± 0.07
Page 22 of 27
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
22
Table 2. Hill coefficients of EMGS and EMGS-ΔC in different concentrations of phosphate.
Values are the averages of three experiments and standard errors are less than 8%.
[P] concentration 0 mM 0.2 mM 0.5 mM 1 mM
nH of EMGS 1±0.08 1.37±0.09 1.46±0.08 1.72±0.12
nH of EMGS-∆C 1.30±0.07 1.27±0.07 1.32±0.06 1.5±0.09