Date post: | 13-Mar-2023 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | khangminh22 |
View: | 2 times |
Download: | 0 times |
1
OWNER:
Chris Keating
PROJECT LEADER: Tracy Hutton
TEAM MEMBERS: Dr. Shahrukh Irani
Sachin Varkey Vasudev Nalapat
Ramkumar Harikrishnakumar
Design of Overall Factory Layout
2
Acknowledgement
The project team wishes to sincerely thank Dr. Smart Khaewsukkho, Ph.D., for granting us unlimited use of his
Flow Assessment Tool (FAT) app for this project. If you have questions about the app, please directly contact Dr.
Khaewsukkho by email ([email protected]) or phone (614-598-0642).
3
Objective Strategies Measures Product Flow: Reduce steps in current process by 20%. New/Rebuild Lead Time Reduction: Reduce Lead times by 10%. Customer Delivery Performance: 95% OTD to promise
Design short-term & long –term factory layouts subject to the current constraints and incorporation of new CNC machines Investigate the feasibility of a future factory layout with separate focused factories for New & Rebuild screws Utilize PFAST software and FAT app to visualize and analyze the production flows in the different layouts Use quantitative metrics such as Lead Time, Labor Cost and Material Handling Distance to evaluate proposed layouts
Reduce Lead Time and Production Cost by designing an overall factory layout to improve flow and shop floor control
Goals
Material handling distance
that Water Striders have to
push carts that weigh 100-
1300 lbs. throughout the
year will be reduced by 100
miles
Lead time for a set of New
screws will be reduced by
≈11 days
Annual Labor Cost of
material handling will be
reduced by ≈ $56,925
Project - OGSM
4
Current Factory Layout
BOXING & ASSEMBLY
FINISH INSPECTION
MAGNAFLUX
WEINGARTNER
COBURG 1COBURG 2
MAZAK
PBR LATHE
MORI NT6600
NEW SMTW (G5)NORTON GRINDER (G7)
TANK NEUTRALIZE
TM1
TM2
TM3
TM4
MASK
BLAST
STELLITE PTA1
STELLITE PTA2
WIR
E WELD
SPRAYCORE DRILL
W TOSS LATHE
N TO
SS LATH
E
SAW
PO
LOSH
BO
OTH
S
PRESS
MAINTENANCE
HOB MACHINE
SHA
RP
M
ILL
SHA
RP
LA
TH
E
WE
BB
LA
TH
ET
AR
NO
W
LAT
HE
BRIDGEPORT
DA
EWO
O
E TOSS LA
THE
PA
RA
LLELSIM
SAN
D
BLA
ST
CONICAL SIM
VDF LATHE
OV
EN
EITEL PRESS
WIRE WELD
PRE-INSPECTION
BARREL INSPECTION
Machine Shop
CNC Department
Thread Mills
Grinders
Welding
Polish
Straightener Press
Simulation
5
Production Flow in the Current Factory Layout
Distance travelled by a new set of screws
is ≈ 1 mile in a 63,000 sq.ft. facility.
6
Layout 1: Proposed Moves
Changes made in current factory layout to realize this new layout:
Raw material enters main facility through the Maintenance door
Move Pre-inspection to warehouse
Move Boxing to current location of Pre-inspection
Move Final Inspection & Barrel Inspection to current location of Boxing
Move Daewoo, Bridgeport & Webb lathes next to Boxing department
Move Yellow Press (P1) across from the Weingartner to create a cell that includes the SIM
station for parallel screws
Move Sharp Mill, Tarnow Lathe & Sharp Lathe to current location of Saw
Move East TOS Lathe to current location of the Sharp mill
Move West TOS Lathe to current location of Daewoo
Move Saw to current location of East TOS Lathe
Move Eitel Press (P2) to current location of West TOS Lathe to create a cell that includes
the Coburgs, Hob and SIM station for conical screws
7
Layout 1: Constraints/Assumptions
Machines/departments in the current factory layout that were not moved:
Weingartner
Due to its heavy foundation
Core Drill
Due to its age, the machine has experienced considerable wear and tear; any
attempt to move it could damage it irreparably
Mori Seki
Due to its heavy foundation
Welding Department
Difficult to run gas lines
‘Dirty’ Departments – Spray, Blast & Mask
Requires a closed room
Polish Department
Current location is good
8
BOXING & ASSEMBLY
FINISH INSPECTION
MAGNAFLUX
WEINGARTNER
COBURG 1COBURG 2
MAZAK
MORI NT6600
NEW SMTW (G5)NORTON GRINDER (G7)
TANK NEUTRALIZE
TM1
TM2
TM3
TM4
MASK
BLAST
STELLITE PTA1
STELLITE PTA2
WIR
E WELD
SPRAYCORE DRILL
W TOSS LATHE
N TO
SS LATH
E
SAW
PO
LOSH
BO
OTH
S
PRESS
MAINTENANCE
HOB MACHINE
SHA
RP
M
ILL
SHA
RP
LA
TH
E
WE
BB
LA
TH
ET
AR
NO
W
LAT
HE
BRIDGEPORT
DA
EWO
O
E TOSS LA
THE
PA
RA
LLELSIM
SAN
D
BLA
ST
CONICAL SIM
VDF LATHE
OV
EN
EITEL PRESS
WIRE WELD
PRE-INSPECTION
BARREL INSPECTION
WAREHOUSE
PBR LATHE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Layout 1: Proposed Machine Moves
Re-located Machines/ Departments
Fixed machines
* Arrows indicate the proposed location changes for the machines
9
BOXING & ASSEMBLY
FINISH INSPECTION
MAGNAFLUX
WEINGARTNER
COBURG 1COBURG 2
MAZAK
PBR LATHE
MORI NT6600
NEW SMTW (G5)NORTON GRINDER (G7)
TANK NEUTRALIZE
TM1
TM2
TM3
TM4
MASK
BLAST
STELLITE PTA1
STELLITE PTA2
WIR
E WELD
SPRAYCORE DRILL TOSS LATHE
N TO
SS LATH
E
SAW
PO
LOSH
BO
OTH
S
PRESS
MAINTENANCE
HOB MACHINE
SHARP MILL
SHARP LATHE
WE
BB
LA
TH
E
TARNOW LATHE
BRIDGEPORT
DAEWOO
TOSS LATHE
PA
RA
LLELSIM
SAN
D
BLA
ST
CONICAL SIM
VDF LATHE
OV
EN
EITEL PRESS
WIRE WELD
BARREL INSPECTION
Layout 1
Bar stock enters through here
* Diagram is not to scale, kindly refer AutoCAD version
Re-located Machines/ Departments
Fixed machines
Cell 1
10
Layout 1: Implement a Cell
Pre-inspection, Boxing, Final Inspection & Barrel Inspection moved Yellow Straightener moved and re-located across from the Weingartner in a cell
Form a cell comprised of Weingartner, Yellow Straightener and SIM station
With the Yellow Straightener in its current location, large screws have
to move back-and-forth between the Straightener
and the Weingartner at least three times
11
Layout 1: Split a Department into Process Cells
Additional reduction in Material Handling Distance would have been achieved if the App had been able to choose between the Presses P1 & P2 in different routings.
12
Layout 1: Benefits
Employee Safety
Approximate material handling distance travelled by a new screw set = 1 mile = 5280 ft.
Material handling distance reduction obtained from Layout 1 = 20% = 1056 ft.
Average number of sets of screws done per month:
New screws: 24 sets Rebuild screws: 12 sets Repair screws: 12 sets
Coating screws: 12 sets
Water Striders are solely responsible for pushing carts that weigh between 300 – 1600 lbs.
Assuming that Rebuild, Repair & Coating screws travel half the material handling distance compared to New screws in Layout 1, the total material handling distance reduction for the Water Striders:
= 24*1056 + 3*(12*1056/2) (= 44,350 ft.)
= 8.4 miles per month
=100 miles a year
13
Layout 1: Benefits (contd.)
Cost Reduction
Assumption: Speed of cart travel for loaded travel = *0.06 min/ft Time saved by reducing material handling distance = 2660 min per month Considering fully-burdened labor cost @ $ 107/hour, the savings per year gained by reducing material handling distance travelled by the two Water Striders = (2260/60 * 107)*12
= $ 56,925
14
Layout 1: Benefits (contd.)
Lead Time Reduction
By reducing the travel distance between two consecutive work centers that process a job, there is an implicit assumption that current Lead Time between those two work centers can be reduced by 20% - 50%
Job completes at FROM work center
Job picked up by Water Strider
Job arrives at TO work center
Job starts at TO work center
Job completes at TO work center
Current Lead Time between consecutive operations
Any Lead Time reductions gained from changes in the factory layout will require the following projects to be successfully implemented: Job scheduling Improving factory logistics using Water Striders
15
Layout 1: Benefits (contd.)
The 2015 data for completed New screws was used because E1 does not have data clocked for New screws. Based on this data, the current Average Lead Time for a set of New screws ≈ 117 days (= 16.7 weeks including weekends)
Using the Estimated Lead Time Reductions shown in the table, Layout 1 has the potential to reduce Average Lead Time for a set of New screws by 11 days (= 1.6 weeks)
Departments Current Lead Time
(Days) Estimated Lead Time
Reduction
Blank OD ↔ Straightener 3.4 50%
Straightener ↔ HOB 1.3 50%
CNC ↔ Straightener 3.3 50%
Straightener ↔ Simulation 1.3 50%
Polish ↔ Straightener 4.5 50%
Straightener ↔ Inspection 2.7 50%
Nitride ↔ Straightener 2.0 50%
PTA ↔ Straightener 1.1 20%
Straightener ↔ Grind 2.8 20%
Lead Time Reduction (contd.)
Layout 1 will reduce the total time that any set of New screws spends between the following pairs of work centers:
16
Layout 2
Changes made in Layout 1 to realize this new layout:
Move Thread Mills 1, 2, 3 & 4 to the SW corner of the factory
Move PBR Lathe next to the current location of Thread Mill 1
Move Hob to the current location of Thread Mill 2
Move North TOS Lathe to the current location of Thread Mill 4 to create a cell that
includes Saw, Core Drill, East TOS, West TOS, North TOS and PBR Lathe.
Move Welding department below Polishing
Move VDF Lathe to the current location of Welding department
Consider future Cap.Ex purchases:
CNC grinder put next to the Shipping department
Small CNC Lathe with live tooling to replace Daewoo, Bridgeport & Webb Lathe
Move G4 to the current location of the North TOS Lathe
17
BOXING & ASSEMBLY
FINISH INSPECTION
MAGNAFLUX
WEINGARTNER
COBURG 1COBURG 2
MAZAK
PBR LATHE
MORI NT6600
SM C
INC
INA
TI
(G4
)
NEW SMTW (G5)NORTON GRINDER (G7)
TANK NEUTRALIZE
MASK
BLAST
STEL
LITE
PTA
1
STEL
LITE
PTA
2
WIRE WELD
SPRAYCORE DRILL TOSS LATHE
N TOSS LATHE
SAW
PO
LOSH
BO
OTH
S
PRESS
MAINTENANCE
HOB MACHINE
SHARP MILL
SHARP LATHE
WE
BB
LA
TH
E
TARNOW LATHE
BRIDGEPORT
DAEWOO
TOSS LATHE
PA
RA
LLELSIM
SAN
D
BLA
ST
CONICAL SIM
VDF LATHE
OV
EN
EITEL PRESS
WIR
E W
ELD
BARREL INSPECTION
TM1
TM2
TM3
TM4
CNC Grinder
Small CNC lathe with live tooling
Layout 2: Improvements over Layout 1
Raw material enters through here
Re-located Machines/ Departments
* Diagram is not to scale, kindly refer AutoCAD version
Grinding department 1: Dedicated to grinding operations for the Weingartner and those done after Nitride process
Grinding department 2: Dedicated to grinding operations before Nitride process
18
Layout 3: Ideal Flow With Current Equipment 75'-0"
18'-
10 1
/2"
ASSEMBLY
FINISH & BARREL
INSPECTION
Magnaflux
Weingartner
CO
BU
RG
1C
OB
UR
G 2
MAZAK
PBR LATHE
MORI
G1
G2
G3 G4
G5
G6
G7
Tank Neutralize
TM1TM2
TM3 TM4
MASK
BLAST
PT
A1
PT
A2
WELD
SPRAY
CORE DRILL
W TOSS LATHE
N TOSS LATHESA
W
PO
LIS
H B
OO
TH
S
PRESS P1
Maintenance
HOB MACHINE
SHARP MILL
SHARP LATHE
WE
BB
L
AT
HE
TA
RN
OW
L
AT
HE
BRIDGEPORTDAEWOO
E TOSS LATHE
BL
AS
T
CO
NIC
AL
SI
MU
LA
TIO
N
VD
F L
AT
HE
PA
RA
LL
EL
SIM
UL
AT
ION
OV
EN
EITEL PRESS
WE
LD
NEW SIM
NEW PRESS
16'-0"
Added 3rd Straightener
Added 3rd SIM station
* Diagram is not to scale, kindly refer AutoCAD version
19
Layout 3: Ideal Flow VS Current Flow
ASSEMBLY
FINISH & BARREL
INSPECTION
Magnaflux
Weingartner
CO
BU
RG
1C
OB
UR
G 2
MAZAK
PBR LATHE
MORI
G4
G2
G3 G1
G5
G6
G7
Tank Neutralize
TM1TM2
TM3 TM4
MASK
BLAST
PT
A1
PT
A2
WELD
SPRAY
CORE DRILL
W TOSS LATHE
N TOSS LATHESA
W
PO
LIS
H B
OO
TH
S
PRESS P1
Maintenance
HOB MACHINE
SHARP MILL
SHARP LATHE
WE
BB
L
AT
HE
TA
RN
OW
L
AT
HE
BRIDGEPORTDAEWOO
E TOSS LATHE
BL
AS
T
CO
NIC
AL
SI
MU
LA
TIO
N
VD
F L
AT
HE
PA
RA
LL
EL
SIM
UL
AT
ION
OV
EN
EITEL PRESS
WE
LD
NEW SIM
NEW PRESS
16'-0"
ChromeNitride
MCP159ASMASSEMBLE SCREWS, BOX SCREWS, SHIP
SCREWS
MCP150INS FINISH INSPECTION
MCP150MAG MAGNAFLUX
MCP151C4WEINGARTNER
MCP151C1COBURG 1
MCP151C2COBURG 2
MCP151C3MAZAK
MCP151C6PBR LATHE
MCP151C7MORI NT6600
MCP153G5 NEW SMTW
MCP153G7NORTON GRINDER
MCP150TNKTANK NEUTRALIZE
MCP152TM1HECKERT CC
MCP152TM2HECKERT AH
MCP152TM3HECKERT FH
MCP152TM4HECKERT AH
MCP154MSKMASK
MCP154BLTBLAST
MCP154PT1STELLITE PTA1
MCP154PT2STELLITE PTA2
MC
P1
54W
LDW
ELD
MCP154SPRSPRAY
MCP155CD1CORE DRILL
MCP155ML2W TOSS LATHE
MC
P1
55M
L3N
TOSS LA
TH
E
MCP155 SAW
MC
P1
56P
OL
PO
LISH B
OO
TH (7
)MCP155P1
PRESS
MAINTENANCE
MCP155HM1HOB MACHINE
MCP
155M
3SH
AR
P
MILL
MCP
155M
L6SH
AR
P LA
THE
MCP
155M
L5W
EBB
LATH
EM
CP15
5ML4
TAR
NO
W LA
THE
MCP155M2BRIDGEPORT
MC
P1
51C
5D
AEW
OO
MC
P1
55M
L1E TO
SS LATH
E
MC
P150
SIM
PA
RA
LLELSIM
ULA
TION
MC
P1
54B
LTB
LAST
MCP150SIMCONICAL
SIMULATION
VDF LATHE
OV
EN
MCP155P2EITEL PRESS
MCP154WLDWELD
PRE-INSPECTION
BARREL INSPECTION
ChromeNitride
Routing was mapped for New Tungsten Medium-size screws
Layout 3 Current State
20
Layout 3: Ideal Flow VS Current Flow
Routing was mapped for Rebuild Tungsten Medium-size screws
Layout 3 Current State
75'-0"
18'-
10 1
/2"
ASSEMBLY
FINISH & BARREL
INSPECTION
Magnaflux
Weingartner
CO
BU
RG
1C
OB
UR
G 2
MAZAK
PBR LATHE
MORI
G4
G2
G3 G1
G5
G6
G7
Tank Neutralize
TM1TM2
TM3 TM4
MASK
BLAST
PT
A1
PT
A2
WELD
SPRAY
CORE DRILL
W TOSS LATHE
N TOSS LATHESA
W
PO
LIS
H B
OO
TH
S
PRESS P1
Maintenance
HOB MACHINE
SHARP MILL
SHARP LATHE
WE
BB
L
AT
HE
TA
RN
OW
L
AT
HE
BRIDGEPORTDAEWOO
E TOSS LATHE
BL
AS
T
CO
NIC
AL
SI
MU
LA
TIO
N
VD
F L
AT
HE
PA
RA
LL
EL
SIM
UL
AT
ION
OV
EN
EITEL PRESS
WE
LD
NEW SIM
NEW PRESS
ChromeStrip
16'-0"
MCP159ASMASSEMBLE SCREWS, BOX SCREWS, SHIP
SCREWS
MCP150INS FINISH INSPECTION
MCP150MAG MAGNAFLUX
MCP151C4WEINGARTNER
MCP151C1COBURG 1
MCP151C2COBURG 2
MCP151C3MAZAK
MCP151C6PBR LATHE
MCP151C7MORI NT6600
MCP153G5 NEW SMTW
MCP153G7NORTON GRINDER
MCP150TNKTANK NEUTRALIZE
MCP152TM1HECKERT CC
MCP152TM2HECKERT AH
MCP152TM3HECKERT FH
MCP152TM4HECKERT AH
MCP154MSKMASK
MCP154BLTBLAST
MCP154PT1STELLITE PTA1
MCP154PT2STELLITE PTA2
MC
P1
54W
LDW
ELD
MCP154SPRSPRAY
MCP155CD1CORE DRILL
MCP155ML2W TOSS LATHE
MC
P1
55M
L3N
TOSS LA
TH
E
MCP155 SAW
MC
P1
56P
OL
PO
LISH B
OO
TH (7
)
MCP155P1PRESS
MAINTENANCE
MCP155HM1HOB MACHINE
MCP
155M
3SH
AR
P
MILL
MCP
155M
L6SH
AR
P LA
THE
MCP
155M
L5W
EBB
LATH
EM
CP15
5ML4
TAR
NO
W LA
THE
MCP155M2BRIDGEPORT
MC
P1
51C
5D
AEW
OO
MC
P1
55M
L1E TO
SS LATH
E
MC
P1
50
SIM
PA
RA
LLELSIM
ULA
TION
MC
P1
54B
LTB
LAST
MCP150SIMCONICAL
SIMULATION
VDF LATHE
OV
EN
MCP155P2EITEL PRESS
MCP154WLDWELD
PRE-INSPECTION
BARREL INSPECTION
ChromeStrip
23
Current State for only Rebuild screws
Layout 4: Two Separate Focused Factories (contd.)
Shared Resources: Straightener Press Grinders Welding Mask Spray Blast Thread Mills TOS Lathe Simulation Stations Polishing
24
Why Separate Focused Factories is NOT Advisable
Current machines do not have the flexibility to carry out all operations
(ex: all existing grinders cannot perform all the different operations)
Duplicating all of the shared resources requires significant CapEx
Additional manpower will have to be hired
Neither the resources nor the manpower will be at full utilization
Current factory will have to be expanded to implement both focused
factories