Date post: | 27-Nov-2023 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | independent |
View: | 0 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Dialysis and Platelet PS Externalisation 1
THE DIFFERENTIAL EFFECTS OF DIALYSIS AND ULTRAFILTRATE
FROM INDIVIDUALS WITH CKD, WITH OR WITHOUT DIABETES, ON
PLATELET PHOSPHATIDYLSERINE EXTERNALISATION.
Yingjie Wang1, Werner Beck2, Reinhold Deppisch2,
Sally M. Marshall1, Nicholas A. Hoenich1 and Michael G. Thompson1.
1Faculty of Medical Sciences, Framlington Place, Newcastle University,
Newcastle-Upon-Tyne, United Kingdom, NE2 4HH.
2Gambro Corporate Research,
Hechingen, Germany.
Correspondence and Reprint Requests To: Dr. M.G.Thompson
TEL: +44 191 222 8112
FAX: +44 191 222 0723
E-MAIL: [email protected]
Short title: Dialysis and Platelet PS Externalisation.
Keywords: Cell Signalling, Thrombosis, 5-HT2A/2C receptors.
Page 1 of 39Articles in PresS. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol (August 1, 2007). doi:10.1152/ajprenal.00279.2007
Copyright © 2007 by the American Physiological Society.
Dialysis and Platelet PS Externalisation 2
ABSTRACT
Individuals with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and/or diabetes mellitus (DM) are at
increased risk of cardiovascular events and have elevated externalisation of
phosphatidylserine (PS), (which propagates thrombus formation), in a small, sub-
population of platelets. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of (i)
removing uraemic toxins by hemodialysis on PS externalisation in patients with either
CKD or CKD and DM and (ii) ultrafiltrate (UF) from these individuals on PS
externalisation in healthy platelets. PS externalisation was quantified by a
fluorescence-activated cell sorter using Annexin V in platelet rich plasma. PS
externalisation was elevated 3-fold in CKD patients and returned to basal values
during 3 hrs hemodialysis. In contrast, it was elevated 5-fold in individuals with CKD
and DM and was still 3-fold above control after 3 hrs treatment. UF significantly
increased PS externalisation in a small, sub-population of platelets from healthy
controls. The effect of UF from individuals with CKD and DM was significantly
greater than that from patients with CKD alone and the responses were partially
inhibited by the protein kinase Cδ (PKCδ) inhibitor, rottlerin, and the 5-
hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)2A/2C receptor antagonist, ritanserin. The data suggest that
uremic toxins present in UF mediate PS externalisation in a small, sub-population of
platelets, at least in part, via the 5-HT2A/2C receptor and PKCδ and demonstrate that
DM further enhances platelet PS externalisation in CKD patients undergoing
hemodialysis. This may explain, at least in part, the additional increase in vascular
damage observed in CKD patients when DM is present.
Page 2 of 39
Dialysis and Platelet PS Externalisation 3
INTRODUCTION
Cardiovascular disease, in particular atherothrombosis, is a common cause of death
in patients receiving dialysis and co-morbid conditions such as diabetes mellitus (DM)
further influence the incidence of vascular events (13, 19, 20). Progression is
associated with vascular endothelial cell injury, atherosclerotic plaque fissuring and
rupture (33). An early key event in such progression is increased adherence of
monocytes to the damaged vascular endothelium resulting in fatty streak/atheroma
development with platelets subsequently attaching firmly to the site of the lesion (29).
In the plasma membrane of resting platelets, the phospholipid, phosphatidylserine
(PS), resides in the inner leaflet (5) but, upon activation of Scramblase by Protein
Kinase Cδ (PKCδ), PS translocates to the outer leaflet of the plasma membrane (5,
15). It has become increasingly clear that chronically elevated or prolonged exposure
of PS on the cell surface both increases vascular damage and results in the formation
of a hypercoagulable environment by stimulating adherence of inflammatory cells to
the vascular endothelium (e.g. 22) and providing a catalytic surface for assembly of
the prothrombinase complex (29) that accelerates the generation of thrombin (32, 49).
Evidence now suggests that classic platelet agonists such as thrombin and ADP
elicit PS externalisation in a small, sub-population of these cells (45, 48) and that the
size of this population correlates with prothrombinase activity (48). In addition,
increased PS externalisation in a sub-population of platelets has been observed in
individuals with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and DM (45), although the factor(s)
responsible for this response is/are unknown.
Advanced glycation end products (AGE) arise by covalent modification of cellular
and plasma proteins and form a series of heterogeneous compounds (21). AGE are
substantially increased in individuals with either CKD or DM when compared to the
Page 3 of 39
Dialysis and Platelet PS Externalisation 4
general population (25, 44) and may contribute to the development and progression of
cardiovascular disease in these patient groups (35, 39).
In a recent study, we showed that Human serum albumin-AGE (HSA-AGE),
prepared in vitro, elicits PS externalisation in a small, sub-population of human
platelets. Moreover, this response was completely blocked by both the 5-
hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)2A/2C receptor antagonist, ritanserin, and the PKCδ
inhibitor, rottlerin (45).
In order to translate this work towards the in vivo situation, we have now explored
firstly, the effect of hemodialysis on the elevated PS externalisation we observed in
patients with CKD/DM and secondly, the ability of ultrafiltrate from these individuals
to elicit PS externalisation in platelets from healthy controls and the mechanism(s)
involved.
Page 4 of 39
Dialysis and Platelet PS Externalisation 5
METHODS
Materials and Reagents
Annexin V-fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) was purchased from Immunotech
(Marseille, France) and the FluoroSpheres for FACScan calibration were obtained
from DakoCytomation (Glostrup, Denmark). The fluorescence-activated cell-scanner,
CD61 – PerCP and the Caspase 3 inhibitor, Z-DEVD-FMK, were purchased from
Becton Dickinson (Cowley, Oxford, UK). Rottlerin and Bisindolylmaleimide 1 were
from Merck Biosciences Ltd (Beeston, Nottingham, UK). The 5-HT2A2C receptor
antagonist, ritanserin, and all general chemicals were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich
(Poole, Dorset, UK). The low-flux Fresenius polysulfone® hemodialysis membrane
was purchased from Fresenius Medical Care (Bad Homburg, Germany) and the
ENDOSAFE® LAL Gel Clot Test was from Charles River (Charleston, USA).
Patients
26 stable individuals (age range 32-85 years) who had been receiving low flux
conventional hemodialysis using a Fresenius Polysulfone membrane 3 times per week
for at least 3 months gave their informed consent to participate in the study. 8 (6 male
and 2 female) of these also had Type 2 DM, whilst the remaining 18 (13 male and 5
female) did not.
The effect of a single, low-flux hemodialysis treatment on platelet PS externalization
in individuals with either CKD or CKD and DM
Hemodialysis patients at Newcastle undergo three sessions a week for 4 hours at a
time. The individuals selected for this study were treated on Monday, Wednesday and
Page 5 of 39
Dialysis and Platelet PS Externalisation 6
Friday. There was no preference for any particular day when examining the effect of a
single treatment.
A 2.5 ml blood sample was withdrawn pre-dialysis and then 1, 2 and 3 hours after
the commencement of hemodialysis from patients with either CKD or CKD and DM
using a standard 16G hypodermic needle. This was then immediately added to a tube
containing acid citrate dextrose (ACD) and centrifuged at 100g for 15 minutes at
20°C (Beckman J6-MC). The upper phase containing the Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP)
was removed and the extent of PS externalisation was determined as described below.
The effect of three low-flux hemodialysis treatments during a seven day period on
platelet PS externalisation in individuals with either CKD or CKD and DM
Pre- and 3 hours post-dialysis blood samples (2.5 ml) were withdrawn on Monday,
Wednesday and Friday from patients with either CKD or CKD and DM using a
standard 16G hypodermic needle. PRP was then prepared as above and the extent of
PS externalisation was determined as described below.
Preparation of PRP from healthy control subjects
Blood was obtained from 6 healthy control subjects (2 male and 4 female, age
range 28-52 years) who had no history of cardiovascular disease or hypertension and
were not using any medication. PRP was then prepared as above and subsequently
incubated with ultrafiltrate under various treatment conditions as described below.
Collection of Ultrafiltrate (UF) from individuals with either CKD or CKD and DM
Studies using urea as a candidate molecule to understand solute kinetics in
hemodialysis have revealed that it is rapidly removed during the first 30 minutes, but
Page 6 of 39
Dialysis and Platelet PS Externalisation 7
that its removal rate then gradually declines throughout the rest of dialysis (e.g. 24).
We have therefore utilised two time points, 20 minutes and 180 minutes, to
investigate effects on PS externalisation in these two different kinetic phases.
To collect pure ultrafiltrate, the dialysis fluid was disconnected from the dialyser
for a short period both 20 minutes (UF20) and 180 minutes (UF180) after the start of
treatment. The dialysis fluid pathway was evacuated, ultrafiltrate was allowed to flow
for 2-3 minutes and 3 mls of ultrafiltrate was collected into an endotoxin-free tube.
The system was then reconnected and the treatment continued.
Effect of ultrafiltrate from individuals with CKD or CKD and DM on PS
externalisation
PRP was prepared from healthy controls as described above and then incubated
with increasing volumes (2.5 – 20 µl) of either UF20 or UF180 from individuals with
CKD or CKD and DM at 37°C for 10 minutes. Samples were immediately placed on
ice and PS externalisation was determined as described below.
Effect of ADP on PS externalisation in healthy controls and individuals with CKD or
CKD and DM during hemodialysis
PRP was prepared from individuals with either CKD or CKD and DM at 20
minutes and 180 minutes after the commencement of hemodialysis, or from healthy
controls. ADP (100 nM) was then added for 1 minute. The extent of PS
externalisation was then determined as described below.
Page 7 of 39
Dialysis and Platelet PS Externalisation 8
Effect of inhibition of Caspase 3 on PS externalisation mediated by ultrafiltrate from
individuals with CKD or CKD and DM
PRP prepared from healthy controls was pre-incubated with 20 µM of the Caspase
3 inhibitor, Z-DEVD-FMK, or its negative control, Z-FAD-FMK (17), for 30 minutes
and then 10 µl of either UF20 or UF180 from individuals with CKD or CKD and DM
was added for 10 minutes at 37°C. The extent of PS externalisation was determined as
described below.
Effect of inhibition of Protein Kinase Cδ on PS externalisation mediated by
ultrafiltrate from individuals with CKD or CKD and DM
PRP prepared from healthy controls was pre-incubated with 10 µM of the PKCδ
inhibitor, rottlerin, for 5 minutes. This concentration has been reported to block PKCδ
activity by approx. 80-90% whilst having no effect on representative examples of
either the classical e.g. PKCα or atypical e.g. PKCζ isoforms (15). 10 µl of either
UF20 or UF180 from individuals with CKD or CKD and DM was then added for 10
minutes at 37°C. The extent of PS externalisation was determined as described below.
Effect of a 5-HT2A/2C receptor antagonist on PS externalisation mediated by
ultrafiltrate from individuals with CKD or CKD and DM
PRP prepared from healthy controls was pre-incubated for 30 minutes with 1 µM of
the 5-HT2A/2C receptor antagonist, ritanserin (26). 10 µl of either UF20 or UF180 from
individuals with CKD or CKD and DM was then added for 10 minutes at 37°C. The
extent of PS externalisation was determined as described below.
Page 8 of 39
Dialysis and Platelet PS Externalisation 9
Measurement of PS externalisation in PRP
PS externalisation was determined using the cell membrane-impermeant, PS-
specific, Annexin V-fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) conjugate and CD61 – PerCP
as a platelet-specific marker with subsequent quantification by a fluorescence-
activated cell-scanner (FACScan) supporting Lysis II software as described
previously (45).
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was undertaken using Minitab 14 (Minitab Inc, State College,
PA, USA). Studies with the Caspase 3 / PKCδ inhibitors and the 5-HT2A/2C receptor
antagonist were analysed by use of Student’s t-test and are presented as Means ±
s.e.m. where *p<0.05, **p<0.01 and ***p<0.001 with respect to the relevant control.
Serial measurements with ultrafiltrate from individuals with CKD or CKD and DM
were analysed as summary measures (27), i.e. the areas under the concentration or
time curves (AUC). All experiments were performed on at least three occasions.
Page 9 of 39
Dialysis and Platelet PS Externalisation 10
RESULTS
The analysis of PRP prepared from individuals with CKD or CKD and DM pre-
dialysis revealed a sub-population of platelets (approx 3 % and 10% of the total
population respectively) with increased PS externalisation when compared to healthy
controls (Figs. 1 and 2). We have therefore characterised this small population in
detail and all subsequent data describing the effects of dialysis relate to this fraction.
The degree of pre-dialysis PS externalisation in platelets derived from individuals
with CKD and DM was significantly higher than that from patients with CKD alone
(161 ± 1 vs 99 ± 5 x 102 total fluorescent binding sites, p<0.001; n=3). Analysis of PS
externalisation during low flux (Fresenius Polysulfone) dialysis for 3 hours in
individuals with CKD showed that, whilst still slightly elevated after 60 minutes, this
parameter had returned to basal values after 2 hours (Figs. 1 and 3). In contrast, PS
externalization in the platelet sub-population derived from patients with CKD and
DM, whilst significantly reduced, was still well above basal values (78 ± 1 vs 30 ± 1 x
102 total fluorescent binding sites, p<0.001; n=3) after 3 hours dialysis (Figs. 2 and 3).
When patients undergo dialysis on Monday, Wednesday and Friday, there is a 2
day interval between treatments Monday – Wednesday and Wednesday – Friday, but
a 3 day interval between Friday – Monday. We were therefore interested to establish
if the 3 day interval, with its likely greater accumulation of metabolites, resulted in
increased PS externalization on a Monday when compared with Wednesday/Friday.
Analysis showed that the degree of pre-dialysis PS externalization in patients with
CKD or CKD and DM was significantly higher on Monday than the two other days of
the week when dialysis took place (Fig. 4). Moreover, in spite of the increased PS
externalization seen in CKD patients on a Monday, this had returned to basal values
following dialysis treatment (Fig. 4a).
Page 10 of 39
Dialysis and Platelet PS Externalisation 11
When increasing volumes of ultrafiltrate from individuals with either CKD or CKD
and DM were added to PRP from healthy controls, statistically significant (p<0.001 in
all cases; n=4) increases in PS externalization in a sub-population of platelets (approx
3 % and 5 % of the total population respectively), were observed (Fig. 5). In contrast,
equivalent material prepared from healthy controls using a 30 kDa cut-off filter had
no effect (data not shown). A small, but highly significant stimulation (p<0.001, n=4)
was also seen when hemodialysis fluid, which had been used to rinse the dialyser, was
added to PRP (Fig. 5). We have therefore characterised this small population in detail
and all subsequent data relate to this fraction. Optimal responses were observed with
10 µl of ultrafiltrate (data not shown) and analysis demonstrated that the levels of
endotoxin present were below the minimum value (0.03 EU / ml) detectable by the
test. The effects of UF20 and UF180 taken from individuals with CKD and DM were
significantly greater than the corresponding samples generated by patients with CKD
alone and, interestingly, UF180 from both patient groups appeared as potent in eliciting
PS externalisation as UF20 (Fig. 5).
At this point in our investigation, it was not clear why, with the CKD data for
example, PS externalisation had returned to basal values after 180 minutes dialysis
(Figs 1 and 2), yet ultrafiltrate removed at the same time point elicited a substantial
increase in PS externalisation when added to PRP from healthy individuals (Fig. 5). In
order to address this question, we firstly examined the ability of UF20 and UF180 from
individuals with CKD to elicit PS externalisation on PRP from both healthy controls
and that taken from patients with CKD after 180 minutes hemodialysis. Whilst UF20
and UF180 elicited substantial increases in PS externalisation in PRP from healthy
controls, they had no effect on that generated from individuals with CKD following
180 minutes dialysis (Fig. 6a). Similar data were obtained when ultrafiltrate and PRP
Page 11 of 39
Dialysis and Platelet PS Externalisation 12
from patients with CKD and DM were used (Fig. 6b). This insensitivity could be due
to either the uremic status per se of the individuals and / or the hemodialysis process
which in some way desensitizes platelets to the active component(s) present in
ultrafiltrate.
In order to investigate these observations further, we then examined the ability of
ADP, a classic physiological activator of human platelets (16), to elicit PS
externalisation in PRP from either healthy controls or individuals with CKD or CKD
and DM after 20 or 180 minutes hemodialysis. In platelets obtained from patients with
CKD after 20 minutes, the magnitude of the response to ADP was reduced (Fig. 7a)
compared to healthy controls (although PS externalisation in the untreated sample was
still significantly elevated as reported in Fig. 3a). After 180 minutes hemodialysis,
platelets from individuals with CKD were unresponsive to ADP (Fig 7a). Platelets
obtained from patients with CKD and DM were unresponsive to ADP at both time
points although, as we have shown in Fig 3b, PS externalisation in the untreated
samples obtained following both 20 and 180 minutes hemodialysis had not returned to
basal values (Fig. 7b). This suggests that hemodialysis results in both (i) the removal
of one or more factors able to elicit PS externalisation for at least 180 minutes after
the commencement of treatment and (ii) a time-dependent desensitization of the small
platelet sub-population to both physiological agonists such as ADP and uremic toxins.
In addition to its role in thrombosis, PS externalisation is also implicated in
apoptosis via Caspase 3 – mediated cleavage of PKC δ (11, 30). When PRP from
healthy controls was pre-incubated for 30 minutes with the Caspase 3 inhibitor, Z-
DVED-FMK (20 µM) and then subsequently challenged for 10 minutes with UF20 or
UF180 from individuals with either CKD or CKD and DM, their ability to elicit PS
externalisation was unaffected (data not shown) suggesting that the pathway(s)
Page 12 of 39
Dialysis and Platelet PS Externalisation 13
employed by the active component(s) did not involve Caspase 3. We have previously
shown that when used under identical conditions, Z-DVED-FMK completely
abolished the effect of ADP (100 nM) added for 1 minute whilst the negative control,
Z-FAD-FMK (20 µM), had no effect (45).
The pre-incubation of PRP from healthy controls for 10 minutes with
bisindolylmaleimide 1 (10 nM), an inhibitor of both the classical (α, β, γ) and novel
(δ, ε) isoforms of PKC (40, 46) resulted in a partial inhibition of the increase in PS
externalisation in the small platelet sub-population elicited by the addition of either
UF20 or UF180 from individuals with CKD or CKD and DM for 10 minutes (data not
shown).
Similarly, pre-incubation of PRP from healthy controls for 5 minutes with the
PKCδ inhibitor, rottlerin (10 µM), partially prevented (57-73 % inhibition) the
increase in PS externalisation elicited by the addition of either UF20 or UF180 from
both patient groups after 10 minutes incubation (Fig. 8) suggesting a role for PKCδ in
this response. In all cases, the effects of ultrafiltrate and inhibitor were significantly
different from inhibitor alone (p<0.001, n=3).
The pre-incubation of PRP from healthy controls for 30 minutes with ritanserin (1
µM), a 5-HT2A/2C receptor antagonist, also resulted in a partial inhibition (35-73 %) of
PS externalisation elicited by 10 minutes incubation with either UF20 or UF180 from
both patient groups (Fig. 9). In all cases, the effects of ultrafiltrate and inhibitor were
significantly different from inhibitor alone. This suggests that a significant fraction of
the effects of ultrafiltrate from individuals with CKD or CKD and DM on PS
externalisation in the small sub-population of platelets are mediated via 5-HT2A/2C
receptors.
Page 13 of 39
Dialysis and Platelet PS Externalisation 14
DISCUSSION
Cardiovascular disease, particularly atherosclerosis, is a major cause of morbidity
and mortality in patients undergoing current haemodialysis therapies (13, 19, 20). It is
clear from our study that, with regard to platelet PS externalisation, there is a distinct
difference between the effect of hemodialysis on individuals with CKD and DM when
compared to CKD alone. In the former group, PS externalisation in the platelet sub-
population had essentially reached a nadir after 3 hours hemodialysis at a value well
above that observed in healthy controls whilst, in the latter, it had returned to normal
values. It remains to be established if the failure of PS externalisation to return to
normal values in individuals with co-morbid conditions such as DM plays a role in the
increased vascular damage observed in this patient group (13, 19, 20).
A primary cause of vascular disease in individuals undergoing hemodialysis is the
inadequate removal of uremic toxins (3) and AGE, which are amongst the best studied
of these toxins (42), may contribute to the development and progression of
cardiovascular disease in these patients (35, 39). In support of this hypothesis, we
have recently provided evidence suggesting that HSA-AGE elicits PS externalisation,
a key step in the generation of thrombin (32, 49), in a small, sub-population of human
platelets via the 5-HT2A/2C receptor and PKCδ (45).
Our observation that the effects of UF20 / UF180 from both patient groups on PS
externalisation could also be partially blocked by the same inhibitors we employed in
our previous study suggests that AGE, acting through a similar mechanism, may also
play a role in the responses we report here. With regard to AGE in plasma, most are
modified amino acid residues of plasma protein, whilst glycation-free adducts
normally comprise less than 5% of the total. The latter increase substantially in
uraemia e.g. Nε-carboxymethy-lysine (CML), Nε-carboxyethyl-lysine (CEL), glyoxal–
Page 14 of 39
Dialysis and Platelet PS Externalisation 15
HI (G-H1), methylglyoxal (MG-H1) and 3-deoxyglucosone (3DG-H) are elevated
many fold and, at the end of a 4 hour dialysis session with a polysulfone membrane,
these increases in plasma (and ultrafiltrate) concentrations were reversed to varying
degrees, but not normalised (1).
When considering the plasma protein content of AGE, most are not eliminated
efficiently by hemodialysis e.g.G-H1 residues, CEL, CML and pentosidine, which are
elevated 2-, 3- and 4-fold respectively prior to dialysis, did not change during
treatment (1). The potential role / identity of glycation-free adducts and plasma
protein AGE in the responses we report here requires further investigation.
In addition to AGE, another potential receptor-mediated mechanism which
requires consideration involves release of the contents of both platelet-dense granules
and α-granules which occurs when blood comes into contact with artificial material
during hemodialysis. The factors released include ADP, Serotonin, Platelet-derived
growth factor (PDGF), platelet factor-4 (PF4) and β-thromboglobulin (βTG), some of
which do not return to basal values until 20 hours after the end of the hemodialysis
session (4, 8). It is possible that autocrine / paracrine loops play a role in our
observations.
As well as a possible role for receptor-mediated pathways in the stimulation of PS
externalisation we report here, other mechanisms also require consideration. Protein-
bound uremic solutes (42, 43) such as p-cresol and indoxyl sulphate, at concentrations
commonly found in uremia, have been shown to have biological effects (9). The
involvement of such agents is worthy of future study.
Perhaps the most interesting possibility involves a direct effect of one or more
uremic toxins on the activity of Scramblase and / or Aminophospholipid Translocase
(APLT), which opposes the role of Scramblase and is responsible for the inward
Page 15 of 39
Dialysis and Platelet PS Externalisation 16
translocation of aminophospholipids such as PS (6). There is increasing evidence that
oxidative stress is an important complication in hemodialysis (12) and it is now clear
that the activity of both Scramblase and APLT can be modified by alterations to
critical –SH groups (7, 10) e.g. the activity of Scramblase is enhanced by oxidative
modification of one or more sulphydryl groups and is suppressed by the reducing
agent, dithiothreitol (23). In addition to oxidative stress, there is a growing interest in
nitrosative stress (14) and recent evidence suggests that this is present in patients
undergoing hemodialysis (1, 28) e.g. 3-nitrotyrosine levels in plasma proteins have
been reported to be elevated 3-fold prior to treatment (1). Moreover, a very recent
investigation has shown that nitrosative stress both activates Scramblase and inhibits
APLT resulting in PS externalisation (41). Intriguingly, in preliminary experiments
with dithiothreitol, which both reduces disulphides and de-nitrosylates S-nitrosylated
proteins in live cells (38), we observed that this agent was able to partially reverse the
increased PS externalisation seen in the sub-population of platelets from individuals
with CKD (Wang Y and Thompson MG, unpublished observation). Clearly, a
possible link between uremic toxins inducing oxidative / nitrosative stress and the
effects on PS externalisation we describe in this manuscript requires further
examination.
Regardless of the mechanism(s) involved, our data suggest that, in both patient
groups, PS externalisation in the small sub-population of platelets either is, or
becomes, desensitized to uremic toxins / ADP during a 3 hour hemodialysis session.
A number of other studies have also observed decreased platelet activation following
hemodialysis (2, 31, 36, 37). For example, individuals with CKD undergoing
hemodialysis (with either a cellulose acetate or polysulfone membrane) had a lower
percentage of platelets expressing the adhesion molecule, P-Selectin, in response to
Page 16 of 39
Dialysis and Platelet PS Externalisation 17
ADP (0-1 µM) at the end of dialysis than at the start (2). In contrast, increased platelet
activation following hemodialysis has also been reported (18). The mechanism
through which PS externalisation becomes desensitized is not yet clear, but a better
understanding of these observations may potentially facilitate the development of
novel treatments aimed at manipulating platelet responses in pathophysiological
states.
We have previously reported that the effect of HSA-AGE on platelet PS
externalisation was independent of Caspase 3 activity (45) and demonstrate similar
findings here with UF20 and UF180 from individuals with CKD or CKD and DM. In
nucleated cells, these observations correlate with the efficient propagation and control
of coagulation and thrombosis (49), rather than a signal for apoptotic cell removal
(11). Although recent studies have identified the presence of Caspase activity
(including Caspase 3) in human platelets (34, 47), their precise role in these cells
remains unclear.
In conclusion, we have demonstrated distinct differences both between (i) the
effects of hemodialysis on PS externalisation in a small, sub-population of platelets in
individuals with CKD and those with CKD and DM and (ii) responses of healthy
platelets to ultrafiltrate derived from these two patient groups. The metabolites /
mechanisms involved and their consequences in relation to the increased vascular
damage observed in these individuals requires further investigation.
Page 17 of 39
Dialysis and Platelet PS Externalisation 18
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This work was supported by scientific grants from the HOSPAL Cardiovascular
Research Programme and the Northern Counties Kidney Research Fund.
Page 18 of 39
Dialysis and Platelet PS Externalisation 19
REFERENCES
1. Agalou S, Ahmed N, Babaei-Jadidi R, Dawnay A, and Thornalley PJ. Profound
mishandling of protein glycation degradation products in uremia and dialysis. J Am
Soc Nephrol 16: 1471-1485, 2005.
2. Aggarwal A, Kabbani SS, Rimmer JM, Gennari J, Taatjes DJ, Sobel BE, and
Schneider DJ. Biphasic effects of hemodialysis on platelet reactivity in patients with
end-stage renal disease: a potential contributor to cardiovascular risk. Am J Kidney
Dis 40: 315-322, 2002.
3. Cheung AK, Sarnak MJ, Yan G, Dwyer JT, Heyka RJ, Rocco MV, Teehan
BP, and Levey ES. Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risks in chronic
hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int 58: 353-362, 2000.
4. Cianciolo G, Stefoni S, Donati G, De Pascalis A, Iannelli S, Manna C, Coli L,
Bertuzzi V, La Manna G, Raimondi C, Boni P, and Stefoni V. Intra- and post-
dialytic platelet activation and PDGF-AB release: cellulose diacetate vs polysulfone
membranes. Nephrol Dial Transplant 16: 1222-1229, 2001.
5. Daleke DL. Regulation of transbilayer plasma membrane phospholipid asymmetry.
J Lipid Res 44: 233-242, 2003.
6. Daleke DL, and Lyles JV. Identification and purification of aminophospholipid
flippases. Biochim Biophys Acta 1486: 108-127, 2000.
Page 19 of 39
Dialysis and Platelet PS Externalisation 20
7. de Jong K, and Kuypers FA. Sulphydryl modifications alter scramblase activity
in murine sickle cell disease. Brit J Haematol 133: 427-432, 2006.
8. Donati G, Cianciolo G, D’Addio F, Coli L, La Manna G, Feliciangeli G, and
Stefoni S. Platelet activation and PDGF-AB release during dialysis. Int J Artif Organs
25: 1128-1136, 2002.
9. Dou L, Bertrand E, Cerini C, Faure V, Sampol J, Vanholder R, Berland Y,
and Brunet P. The uremic solutes p-cresol and indoxyl sulfate inhibit endothelial
proliferation and wound repair. Kidney Int 65: 442-451, 2004.
10. Fabisiak JP, Tyurin VA, Tyurina YY, Sedlov A, Lazo JS, and Kagan VE.
Nitric oxide dissociates lipid oxidation from apoptosis and phosphatidylserine
externalisation during oxidative stress. Biochemistry 39: 127-138, 2000.
11. Fadok VA, Voelker DR, Campbell PA, Cohen JJ, Bratton DL, and Henson
PM. Exposure of phosphatidylserine on the surface of apoptotic lymphocytes triggers
specific recognition and removal by macrophages. J Immunol 148: 2207-2216, 1992.
12. Floccari F, Aloisi C, Crosci E, Sofi T, Campo S, Tripodo D, Criseo M, Frisina
N, Buemi M. Oxidative stress and uremia. Med Res Rev 25: 473-486, 2005.
Page 20 of 39
Dialysis and Platelet PS Externalisation 21
13. Foley RN, Wang C, and Collins AJ. Cardiovascular risk profiles and kidney
function stage in the US general population: the NHANES III study. Mayo Clin Proc
80: 1270-1277, 2005.
14. Foster MW, McMahon TJ, and Stamler JS. S-nitrosylation in health and
disease. Trends Mol Med 9: 160-168, 2003.
15. Frasch SC, Henson PM, Kailey JM, Richter DA, Janes MS, Fadok VA, and
Bratton DL. Regulation of phospholipids scramblase activity during apoptosis and
cell activation by protein kinase Cδ. J Biol Chem 275: 23065-23073, 2000.
16. Gaarder A, Jonsen J, Laland S, Hellem A, and Owren PA. Adenosine
diphosphate in red cells as a factor in the adhesiveness of human blood platelets.
Nature 192: 531-532, 1961.
17. Garcia-Calvo M, Petersen EP, Leiting B, Ruel R, Nicholson DW, and
Thornberry NA. Inhibition of human caspases by peptide-based and macromolecular
inhibitors. J Biol Chem 273: 22608-22613, 1998.
18. Gawaz M, and Bogner C. Changes in platelet membrane glycoproteins and
platelet-leucocyte interaction during hemodialysis. Clin Invest 72: 424-429, 1994.
19. Go AS, Chertow GM, Fan D, McCulloch CE, and Hsu CY. Chronic kidney
disease and the risks of death, cardiovascular events, and hospitalization. N Engl J
Med 351: 1296-1305, 2004.
Page 21 of 39
Dialysis and Platelet PS Externalisation 22
20. Goodkin DA, Bragg-Gresham JL, Koenig KG, Wolfe RA, Akiba T,
Andreucci VE, Saito A, Rayner HC, Kurokawa K, Port FK, Held PJ, and Young
EW. Association of comorbid conditions and mortality in hemodialysis patients in
Europe, Japan, and the United States: the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns
Study (DOPPS) J Am Soc Nephrol 14: 3270-3277, 2003.
21. Horvat S, and Jakas A. Peptide and amino acid glycation: New insights into the
Maillard reaction. J Pept Sci 10: 119-137, 2004.
22. Kalayoglu MV, and Perkins BN. Chlamydia pneumoniae-infected monocytes
exhibit increased adherence to human aortic endothelial cells. Microbes Infect 3: 963-
969, 2001.
23. Kamp D, Sieberg T, and Haest CW. Inhibition and stimulation of phospholipid
scrambling activity. Consequences for lipid asymmetry, echinocytosis and
microvesiculation of erythrocytes. Biochemistry 40: 9438-946, 2001.
24. Kemp HJ, Parnham A, and Tomson CR. Urea kinetic modeling: a measure of
dialysis adequacy. Ann Clin Biochem 38: 20-27, 2001.
25. Kilhovd BK, Berg TJ, Birkeland KI, Thorsby P, and Hanssen KF. Serum
levels of advanced glycation end products are increased in patients with type 2
diabetes and coronary heart disease. Diabetes Care 22: 1543-1548, 1998.
Page 22 of 39
Dialysis and Platelet PS Externalisation 23
26. Leysen JE, Gommeren W, Van Gompel P, Wynants J, Janssen PFM, and
Laduran PM. Receptor-binding properties in vitro and in vivo of ritanserin: A very
potent and long acting Serotonin-S2 antagonist. Mol Pharmacol 27: 600-611, 1985.
27. Matthews JN, Altman DG, Campbell MJ, and Royston P. Analysis of serial
measurements in medical research. Brit Med J 330: 230-235, 1990.
28. Mitrogianni Z, Barbouti A, Galaris D, and Siamopoulos KC. Tyrosine
nitration in plasma proteins from patients undergoing hemodialysis. Am j Kidney Dis
44: 286-293, 2004.
29. Monroe DM, Hoffman M, and Roberts HR. Platelets and thrombin generation.
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 22: 1381-1389, 2002.
30. Pongracz J, Webb P, Want K, Deacon E, Lunn OJ, and Lord JM.
Spontaneous neutrophil apoptosis involves caspase 3-mediated activation of protein
kinase C-delta. J Biol Chem 274: 37329-37334, 1999.
31. Reverter JC, Escolar G, Sanz C, Cases A, Villamor N, Nieuwenhuis HK,
Lopez S, and Ordinas A. Platelet activation during hemodialysis measured through
exposure of P-selectin: Analysis of flow cytometric and ultrastructural techniques. J
Lab Clin Med 124: 79-85, 1994.
32. Rosing J, Bevers EM, Comfurious P, Henker HC, van Dieijen G, Weiss HJ,
and Zwaal RF. Impaired factor X and prothrombin activation associated with
Page 23 of 39
Dialysis and Platelet PS Externalisation 24
decreased phospholipid exposure in platelets from a patient with a bleeding disorder.
Blood 65: 1557-1561, 1985.
33. Ross R. Atherosclerosis – An inflammatory disease. N Engl J Med 340: 115-126,
1999.
34. Shcherbina A, and Remold-O’Donnell E. Role of caspase in a subset of human
platelet activation responses. Blood 93: 4222-4231, 1999.
35. Shlipak MG, Fried LF, Cushman M, Manolio TA, Peterson D, Stehman-
Breen C, Bleyer A, Newman A, Siscovick D, and Psaty B. Cardiovascular mortality
risk in chronic kidney disease: comparison of traditional and novel risk factors. JAMA
293: 1737-1745, 2005.
36. Sloand JA, and Sloand EM. Studies on platelet membrane glycoproteins and
platelet function during hemodialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol 8: 799-803, 1997.
37. Sreedhara R, Itagaki I, Lynn B, and Hakim RM. Defective platelet aggregation
in uremia is transiently worsened by hemodialysis. Am J Kidney Dis 25: 555-563,
1995.
38. Stoyanovsky DA, Tyurina YY, Tyurina VA, Anand D, Mandavia DN, Gius D,
Ivanova J, Pitt B, Billar TR, and Kagan VE. Thioredoxin and lipoic acid catalyze
the denitrosation of low molecular weight and protein S-nitrothiols. J Am Chem Soc
127: 15815-15823, 2005.
Page 24 of 39
Dialysis and Platelet PS Externalisation 25
39. Thomas MC, Baynes JW, Thorpe SR, and Cooper ME. The role of AGEs and
AGE inhibitors in diabetic cardiovascular disease. Curr Drug Targets 6: 453-474,
2005.
40. Toullec D, Pianetti P, Coste H, Bellevergue P, Grand-Perrett T, Ajakane M,
Baudet V, Boissin P, Boursier E, Loriolle F, Duhamel L, Charon D, and
Kirilovsky J. The bisindolylmaleimide GF 109203X is a potent and selective
inhibitor of protein kinase C. J Biol Chem 266: 15771-15781, 1991.
41. Tyurina YY, Basova LV, Konduru NV, Tyurin VA, Potapovich AL, Cai P,
Bayir H, Stoyanovsky D, Pitt BR, Shvedova AA, Fadeel B, and Kagan VE.
Nitrosative stress inhibits the aminophospholipid translocase resulting in
phosphatidylserine externalization and macrophage engulfment. Implications for the
resolution of inflammation. J Biol Chem 282:8498-8509, 2007.
42. Vanholder R, De Smet R, Glorieux G, Argiles A, Baurmeister U, Brunet P,
Clark W, Cohen G, De Deyn PP, Deppisch R, Descamps-Latscha B, Henle T,
Jorres A, Lemke HD, Massy ZA, Passlick-Deetjen J, Rodriguez M, Stegmayr B,
Stenvinkel P, Tetta C, Wanner C, and Zidek W. Review on uremic toxins:
Classification, concentration and interindividual variability. Kidney Int 63: 1934-
1943, 2003.
43. Vanholder R, De Smet R, and Lameire N. Protein-bound uremic solutes: The
forgotten toxins. Kidney Int 59 (Suppl 78): S266-S270, 2001.
Page 25 of 39
Dialysis and Platelet PS Externalisation 26
44. Walter R, Mischak H, and Haller H. Haemodialysis, atherosclerosis and
inflammation – Identifying molecular mechanisms of chronic vascular disease in
ESRD patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 17: 24-29, 2002.
45. Wang Y, Beck W, Deppisch R, Marshall SM, Hoenich NA, and Thompson
MG. Advanced glycation end products elicit externalization of phosphatidylserine in
a sub-population of platelets via 5-HT2A/2C receptors. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol in
press.
46. Wilkinson SE, Parker PJ, and Nixon JS. Isoenzyme specificity of
bisindolylmaleimides, selective inhibitors of protein kinase C. Biochem J 294: 335-
337, 1993.
47. Wolf BB, Goldstein JC, Stenmicke HR, Beere H, Amarante-Mendes GP,
Salvesen GS, and Green DR. Calpain functions in a caspase-independent manner to
promote apoptosis-like events during platelet activation. Blood 94: 1683-1692, 1999.
48. Wolfs JLN, Comfurious P, Rasmussen JT, Keuren JFW, Lindhout T, Zwaal
RFA, and Bevers EM. Activated scramblase and inhibited aminophospholipid
translocase cause phosphatidylserine exposure in a distinct platelet fraction. Cell Mol
Life Sci 62: 1514-1525, 2005.
49. Zwaal RF, and Schroit AJ. Pathophysiologic implications of membrane
phospholipid asymmetry in blood cells. Blood 89: 1121-1132, 1997.
Page 26 of 39
Dialysis and Platelet PS Externalisation 27
FIGURE LEGENDS
Fig. 1. The effect of a single, low-flux hemodialysis treatment on PS externalization
in a sub-population of human platelets in individuals with CKD.
PRP was prepared from individuals with CKD either pre-dialysis or 1, 2 and 3
hours after the commencement of dialysis. PS externalisation was then assessed using
Annexin V-FITC and CD61-PerCP with subsequent quantification by FACScan. For
comparison purposes, a healthy control is also shown and data are presented both as
(a) a histogram and (b) a dot-plot.
Fig. 2. The effect of a single, low-flux hemodialysis treatment on PS externalization
in a sub-population of human platelets in individuals with CKD and DM.
PRP was prepared from individuals with CKD and DM either pre-dialysis or 1, 2
and 3 hours after the commencement of dialysis. PS externalisation was then assessed
using Annexin V-FITC and CD61-PerCP with subsequent quantification by
FACScan. For comparison purposes, a healthy control is also shown and data are
presented both as (a) a histogram and (b) a dot-plot.
Fig. 3. The effect of a single, low-flux hemodialysis treatment on PS externalization
in a sub-population of human platelets in individuals with either CKD or CKD and
DM.
PRP was prepared from individuals with (a) CKD or (b) CKD and DM either pre-
dialysis or 1, 2 and 3 hours after the commencement of dialysis. PS externalisation
was then assessed using Annexin V-FITC and CD61-PerCP with subsequent
quantification by FACScan. For comparison purposes, a healthy control is also
Page 27 of 39
Dialysis and Platelet PS Externalisation 28
shown. Data are expressed as total fluorescent binding sites and are shown as Mean ±
s.e. of three independent experiments with statistical analysis by Student’s t-test.
Fig.4. The effect of three low-flux hemodialysis treatments during a seven day period
on PS externalisation in a sub-population of human platelets in individuals with either
CKD or CKD and DM
PRP was prepared from pre- (■) and post-dialysis (□) blood samples withdrawn on
Monday, Wednesday and Friday from patients with either (a) CKD or (b) CKD and
DM. PS externalisation was then assessed using Annexin V-FITC and CD61-PerCP
with subsequent quantification by FACScan. Data are expressed as total fluorescent
binding sites and are shown as Mean ± s.e. of three independent experiments with
statistical analysis by Student’s t-test.
Fig. 5 The effect of ultrafiltrate from individuals with CKD or CKD and DM
undergoing low-flux hemodialysis on PS externalisation in a sub-population of human
platelets
PRP from healthy controls was incubated for 10 minutes with increasing
concentrations (2.5 – 20 µl)) of either unused hemodialysis fluid (HF), hemodialysis
fluid used to rinse the dialyser (RS) or ultrafiltrate taken at 20 minutes (UF20) or 180
minutes (UF180) from individuals with either CKD or CKD and DM. PS
externalisation was determined using Annexin V-FITC and CD61-PerCP with
subsequent quantification by FACScan. Data are expressed as total fluorescent
binding sites and statistical analysis was determined as AUC (27). The effects of
ultrafiltrate vs HF was significant in all instances (p<0.001) and the response elicited
Page 28 of 39
Dialysis and Platelet PS Externalisation 29
by both UF20 (p<0.001) and UF180 (p<0.01) from individuals with CKD and DM was
significantly greater than that seen in individuals with CKD alone.
Fig. 6. The effect of ultrafiltrate from individuals with CKD or CKD and DM on PS
externalisation in a sub-population of human platelets from both healthy controls and
individuals with either CKD or CKD and DM after 180 minutes hemodialysis.
PRP from healthy controls (HP) and individuals with either CKD (a) or CKD and
DM (b) following 180 minutes hemodialysis (UP180) was incubated for 10 minutes
with 10 µl of ultrafiltrate taken at 20 minutes (UF20) or 180 minutes (UF180) from
individuals with either CKD (a) or CKD and DM (b). PS externalisation was
determined using Annexin V-FITC and CD61-PerCP with subsequent quantification
by FACScan. Data are expressed as total fluorescent binding sites and are shown as
Mean ± s.e. of 3 independent experiments with statistical analysis by Student’s t-test.
Fig.7. The effect of ADP on PS externalisation in a sub-population of human platelets
from both healthy controls and individuals with either CKD or CKD and DM after 20
or 180 minutes hemodialysis.
PRP from either healthy controls or that obtained from individuals with either CKD
(a) or CKD and DM (b) following 20 or 180 minutes hemodialysis were incubated
with (■) or without (□) 100 nM ADP for 1 minute. PS externalisation was determined
using Annexin V-FITC and CD61-PerCP with subsequent quantification by
FACScan. Data are expressed as total fluorescent binding sites and are shown as
Mean ± s.e. of 3 independent experiments with statistical analysis by Student’s t-test.
Page 29 of 39
Dialysis and Platelet PS Externalisation 30
Fig. 8. Effect of the PKCδ inhibitor, Rottlerin, on PS externalisation in a sub-
population of human platelets in response to ultrafiltrate taken from individuals with
either CKD or CKD and DM after 20 or 180 minutes hemodialysis.
PRP from healthy controls was pre-incubated with or without 10 µM PKCδ
inhibitor, rottlerin (Rott), for 5 minutes at 37ºC. Ultrafiltrate taken from individuals
with (a) CKD or (b) CKD and DM after either 20 (UF20) or 180 (UF180) minutes
hemodialysis was then added and the incubation continued for a further 10 minutes.
PS externalisation was determined using Annexin V-FITC and CD61-PerCP with
subsequent quantification by FACScan. Data are expressed as total fluorescent
binding sites and are shown as Mean ± s.e. of 3 independent experiments with
statistical analysis by Student’s t-test.
Fig. 9. Effect of the 5-HT2A/2C receptor antagonist, Ritanserin, on PS externalisation in
a sub-population of human platelets in response to ultrafiltrate taken from individuals
with either CKD or CKD and DM after 20 or 180 minutes hemodialysis.
PRP from healthy controls was pre-incubated with or without 1 µM 5-HT2A/2C
receptor antagonist, Ritanserin (Rit), for 30 minutes at 37ºC. Ultrafiltrate taken from
individuals with (a) CKD or (b) CKD and DM after either 20 (UF20) or 180 (UF180)
minutes hemodialysis was then added and the incubation continued for a further 10
minutes. PS externalisation was determined using Annexin V-FITC and CD61-PerCP
with subsequent quantification by FACScan. Data are expressed as total fluorescent
binding sites and are shown as Mean ± s.e. of 3 independent experiments with
statistical analysis by Student’s t-test.
Page 30 of 39
Fig.
1
Dia
lysi
sTi
me
Pre
-dia
lysi
s1h
r-dia
lysi
s2h
r-dia
lysi
s3h
r-dia
lysi
sC
ontro
l
Total Platelet Events
Fluo
resc
ence
Inte
nsity
(Ann
exin
V)
Fluo
resc
ence
Inte
nsity
(CD
-61)
Fluorescence Intensity (AnnexinV)
Page 31 of 39
Fig.
2
Pre
-dia
lysi
s1h
r-dia
lysi
s2h
r-dia
lysi
s3h
r-dia
lysi
sC
ontro
l
Fluo
resc
ence
Inte
nsity
(Ann
exin
V)
Fluo
resc
ence
Inte
nsity
(CD
-61)
Dia
lysi
sTi
me
Total Platelet Events Fluorescence Intensity (AnnexinV)
Page 32 of 39
Fig. 3
0
50
100
150
200
250
Control Pre-dialysis 1hr-dialysis 2hr-dialysis 3hr-dialysis
Fluo
resc
entB
indi
ngSi
tes
X10
2
�
���
(a)Fl
uore
scen
tBin
ding
Site
sX
102
0
50
100
150
200
250
Control Pre-dialysis 1hr-dialysis 2hr-dialysis 3hr-dialysis
���
��
(b)
Page 33 of 39
Fig. 4
0
50
100
150
200
250
Monday Wednesday Friday
Fluo
resc
entB
indi
ngSi
tes
X10
2
�
���
���
���
(a)
0
50
100
150
200
250
Monday Wednesday Friday
Fluo
resc
entB
indi
ngSi
tes
X10
2 ��
��
��
��
(b)
Page 34 of 39
Fig. 5
0
10
20
30
40
HF RS UF20 UF180 UF20 UF180
AU
Cof
Incr
easi
ngU
FVo
lum
e-de
pend
ent
Fluo
resc
entB
indi
ngSi
tes
X10
4
CKD CKD&DM
Page 35 of 39
Fig. 6
0
50
100
150
200
250
HP UP180 HP+UF20 UP180+UF20 HP+UF180 UP180+UF180
Fluo
resc
entB
indi
ngSi
tes
X10
2
���
���
Fluo
resc
entB
indi
ngSi
tes
X10
2
0
50
100
150
200
250
HP UP180 HP+UF20 UP180+UF20 HP+UF180 UP180+UF180
���
���
(a)
(b)
Page 36 of 39
Fig. 7Fl
uore
scen
tBin
ding
Site
sX
102
0
50
100
150
HP UP20 UP180
����
(a)
(b)
Fluo
resc
entB
indi
ngSi
tes
X10
2
0
50
100
150
HP UP20 UP180
���
Page 37 of 39
Fig. 8
(a)
(b)
0
50
100
150
200
250
Control Rottlerin UF20 Rott+UF20 UF180 Rott+UF180
Fluo
resc
entB
indi
ngSi
tes
X10
2
������
0
50
100
150
200
250
Control Rottlerin UF20 Rott+UF20 UF180 Rott+UF180
Fluo
resc
entB
indi
ngSi
tes
X10
2
������
Page 38 of 39