+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Diversity of medicinal trees in Unguja central district, Zanzibar

Diversity of medicinal trees in Unguja central district, Zanzibar

Date post: 02-Feb-2023
Category:
Upload: khangminh22
View: 0 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
110
The University of Dodoma University of Dodoma Institutional Repository http://repository.udom.ac.tz Natural Sciences Master Dissertations 2017 Diversity of medicinal trees in Unguja central district, Zanzibar Haji, Haji Mohd The University of Dodoma Haji, H. M. (2017). Diversity of medicinal trees in Unguja central district, Zanzibar. Dodoma: The University of Dodoma http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12661/523 Downloaded from UDOM Institutional Repository at The University of Dodoma, an open access institutional repository.
Transcript

The University of Dodoma

University of Dodoma Institutional Repository http://repository.udom.ac.tz

Natural Sciences Master Dissertations

2017

Diversity of medicinal trees in Unguja

central district, Zanzibar

Haji, Haji Mohd

The University of Dodoma

Haji, H. M. (2017). Diversity of medicinal trees in Unguja central district, Zanzibar. Dodoma: The

University of Dodoma

http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12661/523

Downloaded from UDOM Institutional Repository at The University of Dodoma, an open access institutional repository.

DIVERSITY OF MEDICINAL TREES IN UNGUJA CENTRAL

DISTRICT, ZANZIBAR

HAJI MOHD HAJI

MASTER OF SCIENCE IN BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION

THE UNIVERSITY OF DODOMA

OCTOBER, 2017

DIVERSITY OF MEDICINAL TREES IN UNGUJA CENTRAL

DISTRICT, ZANZIBAR

By

Haji Mohd Haji

A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for the

Degree of Master of Science in Biodiversity Conservation of the University of

Dodoma

The University of Dodoma

October, 2017

i

CERTIFICATION

The undersigned certifies that he has read and hereby recommends for acceptance by

the University of Dodoma a dissertation entitled: “Diversity of medicinal trees in

Unguja Central District –Zanzibar” in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the

degree of Master of Science in Biodiversity conservation at the University of

Dodoma.

………………………………

Dr. Chrispinus D. Rubanza

(SUPERVISOR)

Date …………………………

ii

DECLARATION

AND

COPYRIGHT

I, Haji Mohd Haji declare that this dissertation is my own original work and that it

has not been presented and will not be presented to any other university for a similar

or any other degree award.

Signature: …………………………………

No part of this a dissertation may be reproduced, stored in any retrieval system, or

transmitted in any form or by any means without prior written permission of the

author or the University of Dodoma.

iii

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

I wish to express my thanks and gratitude to the Almighty God for giving me the

courage, ability and guidance through the process of preparation of this dissertation.

Firstly, I would like to give special thanks to my Supervisor Dr. Chrispinus D.

Rubanza for his great assistance from the beginning to the end of this study.

Secondly, I would like to express my gratitude to Mr. Hassan Is-haka Bakari of

Department of Forestry Non-renewable Natural Resources for his useful instructions

of this study. I highly appreciate the contribution of Teacher Ali Abdalla of Ministry

of education and Vocational training Zanzibar and I do express my regards to Mr.

Hussein Abdalla and Mr. Ali Kassim of Zanzibar the Forest Department for their

inventory work with GIS map.

iv

ABSTRACT

A study was conducted at Marumbi and Uroa villages of Central District of Unguja

Zanzibar to assess diversity of medicinal trees species based on specific objectives:

(1) to determine diversity of medicinal tree species in the two study village forests;

and (2) to determine extent of extraction of medicinal trees: A total of 99 circular

plots (radius, r= 11.28 m) were laid down systematically. Medicinal trees were

identified and recorded against tree tally, and computed for indices of diversity.

Extent of extraction of medicinal trees was assessed using a socio-economic survey.

Semi-structured questionnaires, matrix ranking and interviews were administered

among 48 local community including traditional healers and herbal medicine dealers.

A total of 55 medicinal trees species which belong to 28 families were identified.

Shannon-wiener index (H‟) ranged from 1.44 to 2.899 for Marumbi forest, and from

1.519 to 3.106 for Uroa forest. Simpson index of diversity (D) ranged from 0.108 to

2.287 and from 0.137 to 0.327 for Marumbi and Uroa forests, respectively. The

Simpson index of dominance (C) value ranged from 0.14 to 0.13 at Uroa, and from

0.18 to 0.14 for Marumbi forest. The most dominant species were Polysphaeria

porvofolia, Macphersonia gracilis, Euclea natalensis and Suregada zanzibarensis.

Rare species were Drypetes natalensis, Croton sylvaticus and Vernonia

zanzibarensis. Results revealed over exploitation of medicinal trees in the two

forests. Based on the inherent knowledge of local communities, Croton sylvaticus,

Drypetes natalensis, Pittosporum viridiflorum, Vernonia zanzibarensis and Teclea

simplicifolia were ranked as priority medicinal tree species. It can be concluded that,

the ongoing overexploitation of the medicinal trees could threat sustainability of

medicinal tree species.

v

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CERTIFICATION ........................................................................................................ i

DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT ....................................................................... ii

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT .......................................................................................... iii

ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................... iv

TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................ v

LIST OF TABLES ..................................................................................................... ix

LIST OF FIGURES ..................................................................................................... x

LIST OF PLATES ...................................................................................................... xi

LIST OF APPENDICES ........................................................................................... xii

LIST OF ABBRIVIATIONS ................................................................................... xiii

CHAPTER ONE ........................................................................................................ 1

1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 1

1.1 Background Information ....................................................................................... 3

1.2 Statement of the Problem ...................................................................................... 5

1.3 Objective of the Study ........................................................................................... 7

1.3.1 Overall Objective ................................................................................................ 7

1.3.2 Specific Objectives ............................................................................................. 7

1.4 Research Questions ............................................................................................... 7

1.5 Significance of the Study ....................................................................................... 7

1.6 Limitation of the Study .......................................................................................... 8

1.7 Scope of the Study ................................................................................................. 8

CHAPTER TWO ....................................................................................................... 9

2.0 Literature Review .................................................................................................. 9

2.1 Theoretical Literature Review ............................................................................... 9

2.1.1 Definitions of Keys Terms ................................................................................. 9

2.1.1.1 Medicinal Plants .............................................................................................. 9

2.1.1.2 Phytopharmaceutical preparation .................................................................... 9

2.1.1.3 Medicine ........................................................................................................ 10

2.1.1.4 Drug ............................................................................................................... 10

2.1.1.5 Herbalist ........................................................................................................ 10

vi

2.1.1.6 Complementary medicine .............................................................................. 10

2.1.1.7 Traditional healers ......................................................................................... 11

2.1.1.8 Deforestation ................................................................................................. 11

2.1.1.9 Species diversity ............................................................................................ 11

2.1.1.10 Pharmacology .............................................................................................. 12

2.1.1.11 Alternative medicines .................................................................................. 12

2.1.2 Theories underlying the use of herbal medicine ............................................... 12

2.1.2.1 Theoretical Perspectives on Herb-Herb Combination. .................................. 13

2.1.2.2 The holistic healing philosophy of the Greek Medicine ............................... 13

2.2 Empirical Literature Review ............................................................................... 14

2.2.1 An overview on medicinal trees ....................................................................... 14

2.2.2 Influence of policy on sustainability of medicinal trees ................................... 15

2.2.2.1 Legislation and Regulation ............................................................................ 15

2.2.2.2 Zanzibar National Forest Policy .................................................................... 16

2.2.3 Active Ingredients in Medicinal Plants ............................................................ 16

2.2.4 Herbal Medicine Remedy ................................................................................. 17

2.2.5 The Pharmacology of Herbal Plants ................................................................. 18

2.2.6 Diversity of medicinal trees .............................................................................. 19

2.2.6.1 Indices of dominance and diversity ............................................................... 20

2.2.6.2 Shannon-Wiener index of diversity ............................................................... 21

2.2.6.3 Simpson‟s index of dominance ..................................................................... 22

2.2.7 Over-harvesting and Commercial of medicinal trees ....................................... 22

2.2.8 Impact of over-harvesting medicinal Trees ...................................................... 23

2.2.9 Utilization of medicinal Trees .......................................................................... 24

2.2.10 Knowledge Gap .............................................................................................. 27

2.3 Conceptual Frame-work ...................................................................................... 27

2.3.1 Independent variable ........................................................................................ 28

2.3.2 Intermediate variables ...................................................................................... 28

2.3.3 Dependent variable ........................................................................................... 28

CHAPTER THREE ................................................................................................. 30

3.0 Research methodology ........................................................................................ 30

3.1 Description of Study Area ................................................................................... 30

vii

3.1.1 Economic activities .......................................................................................... 30

3.1.2 Demography ..................................................................................................... 31

3.1.2.1 Central district Population ............................................................................. 32

3.1.3 Climate ............................................................................................................. 33

3.1.4 Geology and Soils ............................................................................................. 33

3.1.5 Vegetation ......................................................................................................... 34

3.2 Research design ................................................................................................... 34

3.3 Sampling Frame and Sampling size .................................................................... 34

3.4 Data collection methods ...................................................................................... 35

3.5 Data collection tools ............................................................................................ 35

3.5.1 Ethno-botanical Surveys ................................................................................... 35

3.5.2 Questionnaires .................................................................................................. 36

3.5.3 Interviews ......................................................................................................... 36

3.5.4 Matrix Ranking ................................................................................................. 36

3.5.5 Plant identification ............................................................................................ 37

3.5.6 Field Survey Method ........................................................................................ 37

3.5.7 Field Procedure ................................................................................................. 38

3.6 Diversity indices .................................................................................................. 39

3.6.1 Tree species diversity ....................................................................................... 42

3.6.2 Simpson‟s Index of dominance ........................................................................ 42

3.7 Data Analysis ....................................................................................................... 42

3.7.1 Determination of tree indices of diversity ........................................................ 43

3.7.2 Simpson‟s index of dominance ........................................................................ 43

3.7.3 Shannon-Wiener index of diversity .................................................................. 43

3.7.4 Data quality and control ................................................................................... 43

3.7.5 Validity ............................................................................................................. 43

3.7.6 Reliability ......................................................................................................... 44

CHAPTER FOUR: RESULTS PRESENTATION AND DISCUSSION OF THE

FINDINGS ................................................................................................................ 45

4.1 Results ................................................................................................................. 45

4.1.1 Medicinal Trees species diversity .................................................................... 45

4.1.1.1 Forest tree inventory and medicinal trees assessment ................................... 46

viii

4.1.1.2 Simpson‟s index of dominance ..................................................................... 49

4.1.2 Socio-demographic analysis of respondents .................................................... 50

4.1.2.1 Sex of respondents ......................................................................................... 51

4.1.2.2 Level of education ......................................................................................... 51

4.1.3 Extent of extraction of medicinal trees ............................................................. 52

4.1.3.1 Extraction and use of herbal medicine .......................................................... 52

4.1.3.2 Harvesting Medicinal trees parts ................................................................... 53

4.1.3.3 Frequency collection of medicinal trees ........................................................ 54

4.1.3.4 Collection of Priority medicinal trees ............................................................ 54

4.1.3.5 Medicinal trees parts used for trade ............................................................... 56

4.1.3.6 Threatened medicinal trees ............................................................................ 58

4.1.4 Methodology of Harvesting Medicinal trees. ................................................... 58

4.1.4.2 Reasons for declining Medicinal trees .......................................................... 59

4.1.4.3 Effect of improper harvesting medicinal trees .............................................. 60

4.1.5 Conservation measures of medicinal trees ....................................................... 62

4.2 Discussion of the findings ................................................................................... 62

4.2.1 Medicinal Tree species diversity ...................................................................... 63

4.2.1.1 Index of dominance ....................................................................................... 64

4.3 Assessing extent of harvesting Medicinal Trees. ................................................ 64

4.4 Impact of harvesting of Medicinal trees .............................................................. 65

4.4.1 Methods of harvesting diversity of medicinal trees ......................................... 67

4.4.2 Collection medicinal trees for trade ................................................................. 68

4.5 Conservations measures of medicinal trees ......................................................... 69

CHAPTER FIVE: CONCLUSION, RECOMMENDATIONS AND AREAS

FOR FURTHER STUDY ........................................................................................ 70

5.1 Conclusion ........................................................................................................... 70

5.2 Recommendations ............................................................................................... 71

5.3 Area for further study .......................................................................................... 72

REFERENCES ........................................................................................................ 73

APPENDICES .......................................................................................................... 84

ix

LIST OF TABLES

Table 1: Diversity Index of Medicinal Trees ..................................................... 20

Table 2: Indices of dominance (C) and diversity (H‟) values ............................ 21

Table 3: Mostly used parts of medicinal plants .................................................. 25

Table 4: Medicinal trees found at Jozani forest reserve ..................................... 26

Table 5: Human ppopulation as of 2013 ............................................................ 33

Table 6: Tree sampling parameters for Marumbi and Uroa village forests,

Central district, Unguja ........................................................................ 39

Table 7: The values of tree stocking and species richness ................................. 46

Table 8: Diversity indices of medicinal trees ..................................................... 46

Table 9 (a): Medicinal Trees species list indigenous to Marumbi and Uroa Village

forests, central District, Unguja............................................................ 47

Table 9 (b): Medicinal Trees species list indigenous to Marumbi and Uroa Village

forests, central District, Unguja (Continued) ....................................... 48

Table 10: Dominant value (C) of medicinal trees ................................................ 50

Table 11: Sex of respondents ............................................................................... 51

Table 12: Level of education of the respondents.................................................. 51

Table 13: Threatened medicinal trees.................................................................. 57

Table 14: Methods of collection medicinal trees ................................................. 58

Table 15: Conservation measures of medicinal trees ........................................... 62

x

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1: Conceptual frame-work ............................................................................. 29

Figure 2: Map location of Uroa forest study area. ..................................................... 31

Figure 3: Location to show Marumbi forest study area ............................................ 32

Figure 4: Map plot layout of Uroa Forest reserve ..................................................... 40

Figure 5: Map plot layout of Marumbi forest ............................................................ 41

Figure 6: Extraction and use of medicinal trees ........................................................ 52

Figure 7: Harvesting parts of medicinal trees ............................................................ 53

Figure 8: Frequency collections of medicinal trees ................................................... 54

Figure 9: Priority medicinal trees .............................................................................. 55

Figure 10: Medicinal trees parts used for trade ......................................................... 56

Figure 11: Reasons for declining medicinal trees. .................................................... 60

Figure 12: Effects of improper harvesting Medicinal trees ....................................... 61

xi

LIST OF PLATES

Plate 1: Priority medicinal trees (A) Monanthotaxis fornicata (B) Teclea

simplicifolia ................................................................................................. 55

Plate 2: Herbal shop sells (A) roots (B) barks of Pittosporum viridiflorum ............ 57

Plate 3: Herbalists display uprooting method of MTs .............................................. 59

Plate 4: Show rarity medicinal trees (A) Croton sylvaticus (B) Drypetes natalensis61

Plate 5: Improper collection of medicinal trees ........................................................ 69

xii

LIST OF APPENDICES

Appendix 1: Diversity of medicinal trees in Unguja –Central District Zanzibar ..... 84

Appendix 2: Title: Diversity of medicinal trees in Unguja Central District

Zanzibar. ............................................................................................... 85

Appendix 3: Diversity of medicinal trees in Unguja Central District-Zanzibar ....... 87

Appendix 4: Medicinal Trees Data Collection In Villages Forests. ......................... 90

xiii

LIST OF ABBRIVIATIONS

HIMA Hifadhi Misitu ya Asili

WHO World Health Organization

IUCN International Union of Conservation of Nature

RGZ Revolutionary Government of Zanzibar

ZTMC Zanzibar Traditional and Alternative Medicines Council

GPS Geographical Positioning System

Ha Hectare

REDD Reduce Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation

CAM Complementary and Alternative Medicine

USNCI United State National Cancer Institute

API Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient

HPM Herbal Medicine Product

UNESCO United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization

MOHSW Ministry of Health and Social Welfare

DFNR Department of Forest and Non-Renewable Resources Zanzibar

PMTs Priority Medicinal Trees

MTs Medicinal Trees

TAM Traditional and Alternative Medicine

ZTMPA Zanzibar Traditional medicine Policy Act

1

CHAPTER ONE

1.0 Introduction

Globally over-exploitation of indigenous medicinal plants has become a serious

challenge especially in the developing world where healthcare systems and

livelihoods depend largely on herbal medicines (Assefa et al., 2014). Medicinal trees

species are threatened in many countries including East Africa and Tanzania in

particular (Fennel et al., 2004). These priority medicinal trees include Warburgia

salutaris, Warburgia ungandensis, Cassine transvalensis, Alepidea amatyambica

and Erythrophleum lasianthum (Fennel et al., 2004). The increasing demand for

herbal medicines encourages collectors and traders to decimate natural populations

of important medicinal plants. Global interest particularly from the Western

pharmaceutical industry exacerbates exploitation (Williams, 2000). Some South

African medicinal plants are already on the brink of extinction in the wild

(Geldenhuys, 2004). Report from IUCN has identified medicinal Plant species

including Goldenseal (Hydrastis Canadensis) that have become threatened by non-

sustainable harvest and other factors (IUCN, 2002). According to Walter and Gillett,

(1998), about 34 000 species or 8 percent of the world's flora are threatened with

extinction. Approximate 52 000 plant species are used medicinally.

Over-harvesting has placed many medicinal species at risk of extinction as well as

commercial exploitation is another major threat which influences the indigenous

medicinal trees to become rare (Cunningham et al., 2002).There are evidences that

show decline of rich indigenous knowledge about the use of medicinal trees with

regard to types, distribution, ecology and management of medicinal plants

(Hamilton, 2004).In recent studies of ethno-botanical and ethno-pharmaceutical

studies have been conducted and describe traditional herbal products and legalize

2

their use for treatment of human diseases (Light et al., 2005). The global demand for

herbal medicine has been on the rise (Srivastava, 2000; Light et al., 2005), which

some valued indigenous plant species has become threatened (Williams et al., 2000;

Shingu, 2005). However, less is known on the effect of extraction of medicinal trees

in Tanzania and Zanzibar in particular.

A Study conducted on north-western region of Tanzania has recorded top ten priority

medicinal trees species are very scarce due to improper harvesting to near extinction

in some region like Tabora, Shinyanga and Simiyu regions (Ng‟atigwa et al.,1999).

According to the latter authors, a total of 10 species comprising Securidaca

longipedunculata, Zanha africana, Cassia abbreviata, Entada abyssinica, Turraea

fischeri, Albizia anthelmintica, Entandrophragma bussei, Combretum zeyheri,

Zanthoxylum chalybeum and Terminalia sericea have been recognized as priority

medicinal tree species indigenous to Tabora, Shinyanga and Simiyu regions of north

western Tanzania(Ng‟atigwa et al.,1999). Medicinal plant gatherers are familiar with

which species are difficult to find, either because of limited geographical

distribution, habitat destruction or over-exploitation (Hamilton, 2004).Despite

limited information on the population biology of medicinal plants, it is possible to

classify target plant species according to demand, plant life-form, part used,

distribution and abundance (Cunningham, 1990).The use of traditional medicines

and medicinal plants in most developing countries as therapeutic agents has been

widely documented (WHO, 1996; IUCN, 2007).

The World Health Organization (WHO) estimated that 80% of the populations of

developing countries rely on traditional medicines, mostly plant drugs, for their

primary health care needs (Schmincke, 2003).Medicinal plants represent a consistent

3

part of the natural biodiversity endowment of many countries in Africa (Okigbo et

al., 2008).Nowadays, natural medicines are gaining prominence, because they are

economical, easily available and relatively free from side effects (Cunningham,

1991).Although, less has been done to investigate medicinal trees efficacy, herbal

cure is gaining worldwide acceptance and has emphasized on modern scientific

exploration, extraction and evaluation of medicines from plants. There is an urgent

need to develop appropriate conservation strategies to promote sustainable use of

medicinal plants through improved harvesting regime, domestication and monitoring

(Cunningham, 1991).

1.1 Background Information

Medicinal plants are plants containing inherent active ingredients used to cure

disease or relieve pain (Okigbo et al., 2008). Many of the modern medicines are

synthetic substance derived from medicinal plants, for example, aspirin (Assefa et

al., 2014). The use of traditional medicines and medicinal plants in most developing

countries as therapeutic agents for the maintenance of good health has been widely

documented (UNESCO, 1996). Medicinal plants represent a consistent part of the

natural biodiversity endowment of many countries in Africa (Okigbo et al., 2008).

Evidences show that utilization of medicinal plants may have direct link with

declining of population and extinctions of plant species (Cunningham, 2002). There

are evidences suggest the use of herbal medicine among many African countries

whereby medicinal plants drawn from a pool of plant species have been used for

medicinal purposes (Alves and Rosa, 2007).

4

Medicinal plants are collected in the forests which are normally being degraded due

to over-collection (Kuipers, 1997).A few examples include Phytolacca dodecandra

and Catharanthus roseus, are collected and the extract made out is normal used as an

effective molluscicide to control Schistosomiasis (Kuipers, 1997).According to

(Alves et al., 2007) Harpagophytum procumbens is used to produce a crude drug and

exported in Botswana, Lesotho, Namibia and South Africa. Hibiscus sabdariffa is

exported from Sudan and Egypt (Alves et al., 2007).Pausinystalia yohimbe is

exported from Cameroon, Nigeria and Rwanda. Rauvolfia vomitoria is used to cure

multiple human ailments and is exported from Madagascar, Mozambique and Zaire

(Alves et al., 2007).Facts gathered from studies conducted in various parts of

Tanzania (Green et al, 1996; Ng‟atigwa, 1999; Tanya et al., 2001) show knowledge

among pastoralists on the use of medicinal plants in animal and human healthcare.

Priority traditional medicinal trees have been reported in East African countries used

for human, livestock healthcare, and those used for protecting stored grains against

pest infestation in Mwingi district (Grace et al., 2010). Among 18 species recorded

were regarded as priority medicinal plants for human health. Some of the species for

instance Solanum renschii, Populus ilicifolia were already known to be rare species

due to over-harvesting and habitats conversion (Grace et al., 2010).

In Tanzania, deforestation is taking place in many agro-ecologies which is

threatening the ecosystem and sustainability of medicinal trees. Uluguru Mountain

for instance timber harvesting is associated to the loss of species with multiple uses

such as Ocotea usambarensis, other anthropogenic activities are threatening the

availability of Landolphia buchananii, while Satureja biflora and Vangueria infausta

are affected by the root cuttings by the local community (Hamisy et al., 2000).

5

Similar study conducted at Uluguru Mountains in Tanzania has shown that woody

plant communities (trees and shrubs) are more used by the traditional healers than

the non-woody (climbers and herbs) communities, (Hamisy et al., 2000). These

medicinal plant resources are collected from the lowland forests and Miombo

woodlands. Medicinal plants are used to treat various human diseases and

domesticated animals and crops (Hamisy et al., 2000).

Herbal medicine is used extensively by most people in Zanzibar, where by

harvesting of medicinal plant species has been a part of primary health care (Caroline

et al., 2012).Zanzibar traditional and alternative medicine council (ZTAMC) has

identified a number of spices that includes Monanthotaxis fornicata, Zizyphus

mauritiana, Bridelia micrantha, Milicia excelesa,Toddalia asiatica and caesalpinia

bonducela medicinal plants that are harvested regularly for medicinal use and

tourism( Kombo et al., 2002). As of now, over 99 % of the population in the Island

uses traditional medicine either directly or indirectly (Caroline et al., 2012). This

means that care must be taken to maintain the effectiveness, presence and validity of

healers and medicinal plants is of upmost importance (Baylor, 2015). Medicinal and

spice plants are widely collected in Zanzibar and this activity is contributing

significantly to socio-economic well-being of the societies (DCCFF, 2003).

1.2 Statement of the Problem

The threat of diversity medicinal trees species at Uroa and Marumbi forests is central

challenges to the current study. Baylor, (2015) mentioned more 42 plants including

species Todalia asiatica, Vernonia zanzibarensis,Clausena anisata,Suregada

zanzibarensis and Zizyphus mauritiana in Zanzibar Island those are either lost

completely or harder to find them due to excessive harvesting,(Baylor, 2015).

6

Reports from one study of Jozani Forest showed that some species of medicinal trees

are endangered example Pittosporum viridiflorum, Monanthotaxis fornicata and

Croton sylvaticus and Vernonia zanzibarensis is endemic species through harvesting,

other species are disappearing because of timber trees exploitation (Nahonyo et al.,

2002; Nahonyo et al., 2005).

The adverse result of medicinal plants due to excessive harvesting of medicinal trees

could lead to decline or extinctions of medicinal plants (Brown et al., 1997).Studies

have revealed that some medicinal trees specie in the Island are threatened due to

excessive exploitation namely Drypetes natalensis,Teclea simplicifolia,Croton

sylvaticus and Rowsonia lucida (Kombo.,2002;Makame.,2013). More than 90 % of

the population in Zanzibar uses traditional medicine for the treatment of various

diseases (MOHSW, 2008:1; Larson, 2008). Conforming to IUCN,(2014), there are

between 50,000 and 80,000 angiosperm species used for medicinal purposes around

the world, about 15,000 medicinal plants species are threatened with extinction due

to over-harvesting and habitat change IUCN,(2014).A species of Himalayan yew tree

that is used to produce Taxol, a chemotherapy drug used to treat cancer for instance

is being pushed to the brink of extinction by over-harvesting for medicinal purposes

and collection for fuel, scientists warned (IUCN, 2007)

The decline in the natural habitat has led to over harvesting of the available

medicinal plants to meet the increasing local demand and for sale to the urban

population (Owuor et al., 2006).Therefore, the current study has investigated impact

of harvesting diversity of medicinal trees species at selected village‟s forests of

Marumbi and Uroa.

7

1.3 Objective of the Study

1.3.1 Overall Objective

To asses impact of extraction of herbal medicine on diversity of medicinal trees

species of Marumbi and Uroa in Central District of Unguja Island Zanzibar.

1.3.2 Specific Objectives

i. To determine diversity of medicinal tree species at Uroa and Marumbi

forests.

ii. To assess the extent of extraction of medicinal trees diversity in the two

villages.

1.4 Research Questions

1. What is the medicinal trees species diversity of the Marumbi and Uroa

forests?

2. What is the magnitude of extraction of medicinal trees diversity in the study

area?

1.5 Significance of the Study

Finding presented in the current study provide important contribution to traditional

healers and local people in several ways. It would help conservation biologists to

perceive vulnerable and endangered herbal species.The conservation of medicinal

plants as part of the regulation is a crucial goal that deserves more focus. Without

improving the conservation effort, the loss of both the physical plant as well as

knowledge of treatments is eminent (Baylor et al., 2015). Most traditional healers

and local people in the Islands and Tanzania also East Africa at large depend on

herbal medicines although; they have no adequate knowledge about the status of all

medicinal trees in the Island. Findings of the study have provided necessary inputs

8

for the protection of forest in Zanzibar. It would help on the knowledge input of

species diversity of medicinal trees at village of Marumbi and Uroa in the Central

District of Unguja Island.

1.6 Limitation of the Study

The information on plant species used for medicine was very limited. Few people

like traditional healers and old people had traditional knowledge of herbal medicine

and the specialist officers of Forest Department in Zanzibar. The study was set up in

sample plots in forests of coral rags of Uroa and Marumbi villages at Central District

of Unguja Zanzibar Island. Herbal remedies of Traditional healers of selected

villages rely on the two forests and their certain measures sometime ignoring the

basic medical prescription. Furthermore, a financial constraint is another factor; the

fund is limited since a lot of money was spent for data collection in field, transport

and subsistence during the study.

1.7 Scope of the Study

The study was restricted to Marumbi and Uroa villages in Unguja Central District-

Zanzibar. The study has confirmed of over-harvesting of diversity of medicinal trees

which is influenced by anthropogenic activities on diversity of medicinal trees.

Impact of extraction of herbal medicine on diversity of medicinal trees species has

been observed. The forest of this village has been conserved by the government

because of forest destruction. The reason to select Uroa forest is because most herbal

extractors are well known to go within this forest due to diversity of medicinal trees

and also to make comparison of diversity indices of medicinal trees between the two

forests.

9

CHAPTER TWO

2.0 Literature Review

This chapter presents different literature review related to sustainable management of

medicinal trees. Theoretical reviews presents as well as empirical literatures are

presented.

2.1 Theoretical Literature Review

The purpose of this part is to examine concept of theories and knowledge that has

accumulated with regard to diversity of medicinal trees. The theoretical literature

review helps to establish what theories already exist, relationships between them and

to develop new hypotheses to be tested. A brief account definition of key terms is

presented.

2.1.1 Definitions of Keys Terms

2.1.1.1 Medicinal Plants

Medicinal plant is any plant used in order to relieve, prevent or cure a disease or to

alter physiological and pathological process, or any plant employed as a source of

drug or their precursors (Arias, 1999).Herbal medicine also called botanical

medicine or phytomedicine refers to using plant seeds, berries, roots, leaves, bark, or

flowers for medicinal purposes (Schmincke, 2003).

2.1.1.2 Phytopharmaceutical preparation

Phytopharmaceutical preparation is any manufactured herbal medicine obtained

exclusively from plants (aerial and non-aerial including parts, juices, resins and oil),

either in the crude state or as a pharmaceutical formulation (Williamson et al., 1996).

10

2.1.1.3 Medicine

Medicine is a product prepared according to legal and technical procedures that is

used for the diagnosis, prevention and treatment of disease and has been

scientifically characterized in terms of its efficacy, safety and quality (WHO, 1992).

2.1.1.4 Drug

Drug is a pharmacologically active compound, which is a component of a medicine,

irrespective of its natural, biotechnological or synthetic origin. Evidences show

efforts on searching for various drugs active ingredient against tumours, viruses and

cardiovascular and tropical diseases is a priority (Fennel et al., 2004). The largest

research fields, as defined by the number of publications describing bioactive plant-

derived compounds includes anti-tumour drugs, antibiotics, drugs active against

tropical diseases, contraceptive drugs, anti-inflammatory drugs, immunomodulators,

kidney protectors and drugs for psychiatric use (Hamburger and Hostettman, 1991).

2.1.1.5 Herbalist

Herbalist refers to someone who specializes in handling herbs for medicinal purposes

as well as focuses on growing herbs, while others may harvest or collect herbs in the

wild, and some offer herbal prescriptions and advice. In many cases, herbalist

performs all three tasks, managing his or her own stock of herbs to ensure that they

are of high quality (Vallence et al., 2006).

2.1.1.6 Complementary medicine

Complimentary medicine or complementary alternative (CAM) medicine used

together with conventional medical treatments in approaches, not proven by using

scientific methods, it "complements". Integrative medicine (or integrative health) is

the combination of practices and methods of alternative medicine with conventional

11

medicine (Astin, 1998; Hassan et al., 2009). Complementary medicine may involve

non-traditional medical practices, but is undertaken along with traditional healing

approaches. Alternative medicine implies using only nontraditional methods (Ernst,

1995).Some healing therapies are based on Ancient Chinese beliefs, like acupuncture

and the use of certain herbal compounds. Others focus on Hindu, or Ayurvedic,

therapies including diet changes, the practice of yoga, and emphasizing the

connection of mind, body, and spirit (Ernst, 1995; Hassan et al., 2009).

2.1.1.7 Traditional healers

The traditional healers refers to individuals who use the health practices, approaches,

knowledge and beliefs incorporating plant, animal and mineral-based medicines,

spiritual therapies, manual techniques or diagnose and prevent illnesses or maintain

well-being (Schmincke, 2003).

2.1.1.8 Deforestation

Deforestation refers to the removal of a forest or stand of trees where the land is

thereafter converted to non-forest use. Examples of deforestation include conversion

of the forestland to agricultural farmland and human settlements. Main drivers of

deforestation includes trees are being cut for firewood or charcoal and timber,

(Brown, 2002).

2.1.1.9 Species diversity

Species diversity is defined as the number of different species in a particular habitat

in relative frequencies while species richness is the actual number of different

species in the forest (Harrison et al., 2007). Species biodiversity index increases with

the number of species in the community but in practice, biological communities does

not exceed 5.0 (Kent and Coker, 1992).Species diversity is determined by Shannon

12

Winner Index and forests with low Shannon Winner Index have low number of

species.

2.1.1.10 Pharmacology

Pharmacology is the scientific study of the actions and interactions of drugs within a

living organism (Astin, 1998). It includes the study of pharmacological substances

which can be used in the treatment, management, and cure of disease. When external

drugs, whether pharmaceutical or otherwise, enter the body of a person or animal

they become the study of a pharmacologist (Muchugi, 2007). Pharmacology science

encompasses the study of drugs that alter the functions of a given person or

organism. These drugs can be medicinal or not. As an official science, the study

dates back to the 1840s and is not to be confused with pharmacy, which links health

sciences with chemical sciences (Astin, 1998).

2.1.1.11 Alternative medicines

Alternative medicines is any practice that is put forward as having the healing effects

of medicine but is not based on evidence gathered using the scientific method

(Mugisha et al.,2005). It consists of a wide range of health care practices, products

and therapies, using alternative medical diagnoses and treatments which typically

have not been included in the degree courses of established medical schools or used

in conventional medicine. Examples of alternative medicine include homeopathy,

naturopathy, chiropractic, and acupuncture (Batugal et al., 2004).

2.1.2 Theories underlying the use of herbal medicine

A brief account on main theories that govern the use of herbal medicine is presented.

13

2.1.2.1 Theoretical Perspectives on Herb-Herb Combination.

The concept and practice of Chinese medicine is derived from the accumulation of

empirical evidence and subsequent deduction to form a series of theories, many of

which were borrowed from philosophical thoughts such as the balance between yin

and yang and the interrelationship among the “five elements (wu-xing)” within the

body (Zhou et al., 2012).Chinese medicine is based on the theory that the occurrence

and development of diseases are caused by an imbalanced status (e.g., excessive

“coldness” or “heat”) in various body parts (e.g., the zang- and fu-organs), and the

use of medicaments or other means such as acupuncture and physical manipulation

can restore such imbalance so as to re-establish a state of equilibrium (homeostasis)

(Zhou et al., 2012). Based on the latter theories, guidelines have been developed on

application of Chinese herbal medicine against specific ailments. The system

provided the basis for prescription by Chinese medical doctors (Zhou et al., 2012).

The latter authors further note that, most Chinese medicine prescriptions contain

more than one medicinal plant and /or animal /mineral substance.

2.1.2.2 The holistic healing philosophy of the Greek Medicine

The holistic healing of Greek Medicine (460-377BC) states that Man is essentially a

product of nature, or the natural environment. Health is living in harmony with

nature, and disease results when this harmony and balance are upset, (Hoffman,

1990). Healing is restoring this lost harmony and integration. Man and all other

living beings on this planet grew and evolved within this all-pervasive biosphere, and

have been relying on it for their survival, for food and medicine, for millions of years

(Hoffman, 1990). The use of medicinal plants in healing is not exclusive to the

human species; when animals whether domesticated or those in the wild get sick or

feel unwell, so stop eating and munch of healing herbs used until animal feels better.

14

Herbal medicine amongst humans first evolved as an imitation of this universal

healing practice of the animal kingdom (Hoffman, 1990). And so, herbal medicine is

a universal practice among all the world's traditional medical systems, which

developed systems or models of herbal healing based on the holistic healing

principles and concepts inherent to that system (Hoffman, 1990).

2.2 Empirical Literature Review

Study reviews the most relevant studies about herbal medicine. Describing the

overview of the problem, capability of herbal plants in treating diseases, number of

medicinal trees recognized for medicinal value and Pharmacology of herbal plants.

2.2.1 An overview on medicinal trees

Plants have been used for medicinal purposes for most people worldwide.

Indigenous cultures such as African and Native American used herbs in their healing

rituals, while others developed traditional medical systems such as Ayurveda and

Traditional Chinese Medicine in which herbal therapies were used (Assefa et al.,

2014). Researchers found that people in different parts of the world managed to

employ the same or similar plants for the same purposes (Ernst, 2002). Since ancient

times, plants had been an important source of preventive and curative for people and

their live stocks. Today, records of the 422,000 plants species documented

worldwide are reported to have medicinal value, and many are used for medical

purposes (Hamilton, 2004).Herbal medicine is used to treat many conditions, such as

asthma, eczema, premenstrual syndrome, rheumatoid arthritis, migraine, menopausal

symptoms, chronic fatigue, irritable bowel syndrome, and cancer, and many others

(Wink, 2012).The trades in medicinal plants products provide income and

employment to millions of people living in low-income nations. The global market

15

for herbal medicines is estimated to be worth USD 40-60 billion annually

(McMullin, 2011).

In spite of the enormous benefits obtained from herbal medicine, studies have found

many plants used for medical purposes and raise serious concern about the existence

of the species due to over-extraction, commercial and deforestation. In Ivory Coast

for example Garcinia afzelii is considered threatened species due to harvesting for

the chewing stick trade (Ake-Assi, 1988).Destructive harvesting of Griffonia

simplicifolia, Voacanga thuoarsii and Voacanga africana fruits for the international

pharmaceutical market is also of concerned (Ake-Assi, 1988).

2.2.2 Influence of policy on sustainability of medicinal trees

According to RGZ (2008) Traditional and alternative medicine policy realizes the

uses of Traditional medicine and promote the traditional medicine integration into

the national healthcare system; alleviate poverty by enhancing household incomes

through promoting conservation, cultivation, harvesting and trade in medicinal plants

and other medicinal resources; contribute to national economic growth through

registration, licensing and other revenue collection measures. Zanzibar Traditional

and Alternative Medicine Policy, RGZ, (2008).

2.2.2.1 Legislation and Regulation

It has not been any comprehensive legislation and regulation of TAM in Zanzibar.

The practice of traditional medicine has been performed without control of the

government. Importation and exportation of medicinal and herbal products however

was controlled under the Agricultural legislation. The Ministry of Health and social

welfare (MOH and SW) with support from the WHO (2000) has developed a draft

16

Traditional medicine legislation that should regulate traditional medicine practice in

the country ZTAM P, RGZ, (2008).

2.2.2.2 Zanzibar National Forest Policy

Zanzibar Forestry Policy of 1996 (RGZ, 1999) refer to protect, conserve and develop

forest resources for social, economic and environmental benefit of the present and

future generations of the people of Zanzibar” (Silima, 2010).

2.2.3 Active Ingredients in Medicinal Plants

An active ingredient (AI) is the substance in a pharmaceutical drug or a pesticide that

is biologically active. Bio-active secondary metabolites of plants (phytochemicals)

are Saponins, Tannins, Flavornoids, Alkaloids, and Anthraquinones, Cardiac

glycosides and Cyanogenic glycosides. The pharmacological and other beneficial

effects of anti- nutritional factors in plants have been reviewed (Soetan, 2008). The

presence of these secondary metabolites in plants explains the various uses of plants

for traditional medicine. The similar terms active pharmaceutical ingredient (API)

and bulk active are also used in medicine, and the term active substance may be used

for pesticide formulations (Hamilton et al., 2000).

Whole herbs contain many ingredients, and they may work together to produce a

beneficial effect. The effectiveness of the herbs is determined by many factors such

as climate, ecology and soil quality in which plants grow as well as the way of

harvesting and processing (Bausell, 2007).

17

2.2.4 Herbal Medicine Remedy

A drug obtained from tropical plants is quinine, used as a cure for malaria which is

extracted from the bark of several species of the genus Cinchona (Wink, 2012). All

species are small evergreen trees with a hard thick grey bark growing in the valleys

of the Andes of southern America. There are various alkaloids obtained from

Cinchona bark is quinine, with other numerous important alkaloids such as

Cinchonine, Cinchonidine and Quinidine (Wink, 2012).

Herbal supplements are best taken under the guidance of a trained health care

provider. For example, one study found that 90 % of arthritic patients use alternative

therapies, such as herbal medicine (Hamilton, 2008). Example Ginkgo (Ginkgo

biloba) has been used in traditional medicine to treat circulatory disorders and

enhance memory (Kennedy et al., 2007).Recent studies have identified new

compounds obtained from medicinal plant discovered in Madagascar, which is likely

to provide help curb the epidemic of antibiotic-resistant diseases (Wang et al., 2006).

However, new classes of anti-viral drugs derived from plants such as star anise

provide unique hope for combating potential epidemic viral diseases such as flu

(Delvaux et al., 2009). Drugs to fight life-threatening diseases such as diabetes, HIV,

and diarrhea and even substances to protect crops from slugs are being developed

from plants, micro-organisms, amoebae, and other species from African countries

such as Egypt, Somalia, Libya, and Gambia (Barnett, 2006;Ermias et al., 2008).

Scholars have calculated number of plant species which have at one time or another

been used in some culture for medicinal purposes. An enumeration of the WHO from

the late 1970s listed 21 000 medicinal species (Penso, 1980). However, in China

alone 4 941 of 26 092 native species are used as drugs in Chinese traditional

18

medicine (FAO, 1997) which is about 18.9 percent of all trees species. If this

proportion is calculated for other well-known medicinal floras and then applied to

the global uses of medicinal trees will be total of 422 000 flowering plant species

(Hamilton, 2008; IUCN, 2012). It can be estimated that the number of plant species

used for medicinal purposes is more than 50,000 species (Geldenhuys, 2004).

2.2.5 The Pharmacology of Herbal Plants

The pharmacology, toxicology and pharmacokinetics of these herbal medicines are

not well researched (Grace et al., 2002; Nibret et al., 2010). Efforts should be made

by mainstream health professionals to provide validated information to traditional

healers and patients on the judicious use of herbal remedies (Ernst, 2002). The report

from WHO in (2000) revised Malaria cases in Africa and found that 59 plant species

were cited for the treatment of Malaria and related diseases (Okigbo et al., 2008).

The study has also identified and documented the anti-malarial use, probably, for the

first in Ghana of three species namely Haematostaphis barteri, Monanthotaxisis sp.

and Strychnos innocua and first time use of Khayasenegalensis, Haemastostaphis

barteri, Mitragyna inermis, Monanthotaxis sp., Eucalyptus camaldulensis,

Cochlospermum tinctorium and Acanthospermus hispidum for the treatment of

typhoid fever and first time usage of Pittosporus betulinus and Vigna subterranean

for the treatment of plenty of diseases (Okigbo et al., 2008). Majority of healers

claim to treat malaria between 4-7 days, typhoid, within seven days and piles1 -2

weeks. The study has potential sources of remedies for the treatment of the three

selected diseases, malaria, typhoid fever and piles (Geldenhuys, 2004).

19

2.2.6 Diversity of medicinal trees

The studies were carried out in different forest locations to analyze the species

diversity of medicinal trees and plant diversity, Misonge et al. (2015). Simpson‟s

index, Smith with Wilson‟s index of evenness and Shannon-Weiner index were used

to assess the diversity of medicinal trees Norhajar et al. (2010). Simpson‟s Index of

diversity (Krebs, 1989) and is equal to the probability of picking two organisms at

random that are of the same species. It is inversely related to the probability that two

individuals picked at random belong to different species. Therefore the greater the

value of dominance index, the lower is the species diversity in community and vice

versa. The measurements of species diversity; the Simpson's index (D) and the

Shannon Wiener index (H), are common indices used to assess species

richness,abundance and eveness which may recommend conservation measures

Makame, N,(2013). Simpson gives the probability of any two individuals drawn at

random from an infinitely large community belonging to different species (Robert

and Thomas, 2001). A high level of Simpson‟s index (close to 1) means a high level

of dominance and poor species. The species diversity indicated in the Table 1.

20

Table 1: Diversity Index of Medicinal Trees

2.2.6.1 Indices of dominance and diversity

Wilson (2006), defined species diversity is the number of different species in a

particular area and their relative frequencies. It gives information on community

composition and abundance of different species. In other words, species diversity

considers the number of species and the number of individuals in each of the species

(Maganga, 1999). Shannon-Wiener index of diversity (H‟) and Sampson‟s index of

dominance (C) is used to assess forest variations. Table 2; Bernado, (2009); and

Kaniki, (2010) showed how indices of diversity are useful in determining, comparing

and assessing variations of forests tree species and forest condition(s).

Vegetation type Location Shannon

Index (H)

Simpson

Index (D)

References

Logged forest

reserve

Malasia 4.32-5.18 0.869-0.976 Norhajar et

al. (2010)

Mola Forest

reserve

Mafia

Tanzania

3.55-2.32 0.042-0.021 Swai et

al.(2011)

Juani Forest

reserve

Mafia

Tanzania

2.55-2.03 0.11-0.021 Swai et

al.(2011)

Disturbed forest Mabira central

Uganda

2.48 – 0.110 0.88-0.04 Samson et

al.(2015)

Undisturbed

forest

Mabira central

Uganda

2.98-2.78 0.92-0.910 Samson

et al.(2015)

Kiwengw Forest

reserve

Zanzibar 1.20-1.39 0.878-0.18 Makame,

(2013)

Mt Kenya

botanical garden

Kiambu Kenya 2.23-3.93 0.16-0.097 Misonge et

al.(2015)

21

2.2.6.2 Shannon-Wiener index of diversity

Shannon- Wiener provides information on both species richness and species

evenness, its value increases with the increase of number of species in the

community (Krebs, 1989; Maganga, 1999). Krebs (1989) explained as diversity

index value does not exceed 5.0, looking on studies carried out from various sources,

values of diversity are well described. Monela et al.(2005) came up with the results

within the range of 1.9-2.8 at Shinyanga communal and private forest, Bernado,

(2009) result fall within the range of 1.0-2.0 at Shinyanga state forest. Mean results

of Kaniki (2010) showed 2.7 at Manuo hill communal forest and 2.3 at Shirima

private forest, Rombo district.

Table 2: Indices of dominance (C) and diversity (H’) values

Forest

Location

Tenure

Regime

Vegetation

Type

H C Source

Shinyanga State Acacia open

bush land

0.99 -2.01 0.15 -0.41 Bernado,

(2009)

Shinyanga Private Acacia open

bush land

1.9 0.21 Bernado,

(2009)

Manuo Hill Communal

and Private

- 2.74 0.11 Kaniki,

(2010)

Kibele Forest

Reserve

State Coral rag

Forest

1.5 -1.8 0.3 – 0.4 Is-hak,

(2013)

Kiwengwa-

Pongwe

State Coral rag

Forest

0.83 – 1.74 -- Makame,

(2013)

Source: Is-hak, (2013).

22

2.2.6.3 Simpson’s index of dominance

Species that have major contribution or influence on the community by size,

numbers or abundance, biomass or other parameters are known as dominants

Maganga, 1999). The disturbance of the dominants in the community will greatly

change the forests and the components of the forest (Maganga, 1999). Misra (1988)

described Simpson‟s index of dominance as the measure of probability that two

individuals randomly selected from a sample belonging to the same species. It is a

measure of distribution of individuals among species in a community. Its value

ranges from 0 to 1, the greater the value the lower the diversity (Misra, 1988). The

index shows the importance of each species in relation to the whole community. If

the dominance is more concentrated in one or few species the value is high and when

several species contribute equally to the community the index is low

(Maganga,1999).

2.2.7 Over-harvesting and Commercial of medicinal trees

Prominent Botanical Society has reported that about 50 % of the herbs and unique

plant species on earth may become extinct because of over-extraction and other

reasons like global climate change (Hussain et al., 2008). So, if herbs hold the key to

cure of HIV and cancers, we may lose them, which would be disastrous (Hussain et

al., 2008). Famous medicinal trees found in European countries the beautiful Yellow

gentian (Gentiana lutea); this herbal plant had been utilized for treating stomach

ache and other diseases (Primack, 2010). Approximately 1500 tons of dried roots are

used each year in many countries the plants been declining because of over-

harvesting which has become vulnerable in Portugal, Albania, Germany and some

countries becomes endangered (Primack, 2010).

23

In India, had been known having 34 biodiversity hotspots of the world, is perhaps the

largest producer of medicinal plants in the world (Routledge, 2009). About 43,000

plant species recorded in India, 3,000 are known to possess medicinal properties

(Routledge, 2009). More than 900 medicinal plants are used in both classical and

oral health tradition including tribal medicines. Out of these 200 medicinal plants

species are largely extracted for diverse medicine and food products (Routledge,

2009).Thousands of licensed and unlicensed traditional medicine-manufacturing

units in India are collected from forests. Uncertain is increasing about the extinctions

of some species which are heavily extracted in the forest (Routledge, 2009).

Unsustainably high levels of exploitation are not a new problem, although the

problem has been escalated in regions with large urban areas and high levels of

urbanization since the 1960s (Shingu, 2005; McMullin, 2011).

2.2.8 Impact of over-harvesting medicinal Trees

One study has published report of some herbal plant of which has become extinct in

the wild in Ivory Coast which is called Monanthotaxis capea (Annonaceae) is an

aromatic leaves used for washing for cosmetic purposes (Ake-Assi, 1988). (U.S.

Forest Service, 2001), observed that Black Cohosh (Cimicifuga racemosa)

traditionally been used to treat a variety of conditions including colds, pain,

rheumatism, and menopause has been identified as at risk from over-harvesting and

habitat degradation. Studies conducted by Cunningham (et al., 2002) confirmed

Warburgia salutaris is vulnerable medicinal trees due to human induced habitat

degradation and over-exploitation. The species has been categorized as endangered

by IUCN Red list in 2012 (Cunningham et al., 2002) Damage assessments is

required for those species affected in trade and over-exploitation (Cunningham et al.,

2002).Species such as: Okoubaka aubrevillei, Garcinia afzelii, Garcinia epunctata,

24

and Garcinia kola in Ghana, and Nigeria; Warburgia salutaris in Kenya, Tanzania

and Zimbabwe (Cunningham et al., 2002).Assessments is required to find out the

impact of over-extraction of some species namely Prunus africana and Pausinystalia

johimbe also bark harvesting in Cameroon and Madagascar, and fruit harvesting of

Griffonia simplicifolia, Voacanga thuoarsii and Voacanga africana for the

international pharmaceutical market (Cunningham et al., 2002).

2.2.9 Utilization of medicinal Trees

People in different parts collect medicinal plants for the health care and others collect

for business purposes. Khamis, (2011) reported different areas show that the most

parts of medicinal plants used are roots and leaves rather than other parts (Table

3).Probably roots and leaves have high concentration of therapeutic nutrients results

these parts to be more utilized.

The methods of collection differ in one area to another; this is due to the fact that

traditional knowledge of medicinal plants is mostly localized in a particular

community or tribe. The common methods of collection is uprooting, leaves picking,

debarking and so on, it depends on what part of medicinal plants is needed, Khamis ,

(2011).

25

Table 3: Mostly used parts of medicinal plants

Percentage (%)

Parts used Magundi Makweli Bagamoyo Mgwashi Irente Maringo

Leaves 24.0 40.0 28.0 28.0 34.6 32.0

Roots 32.0 24.0 28.0 36.0 34.6 40.0

Barks 12.0 16.0 20.0 24.0 15.4 16.0

Rhizomes 4.0 0.0 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0

Fruits and seeds 8.0 8.0 4.0 4.0 7.7 8.0

Whole plant 16.0 4.0 12.0 4.0 7.7 4.0

Stem and Latex 4.0 8.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Source: Khamis, (2011).

The loss of plants usually occurs when roots, stem and bark are extracted and thus

used for preparation of medicinal trees. In this regards, Assefa and Abebe, (2014),

have reported that plant harvest involving roots, rhizomes, bulb, bark and stem have

a serious effects on the survival of the mother plant in its habitat. On the other hand,

analysis of plants documented shows that herbs share the largest proportion with 64

species (72%), followed by shrubs with 16 species (18%). Ermial Lulekal et al.

(2008) have found shrubs to make up the highest proportion of medicinal use

followed by herbs in their ethno-botanical research.

Nahonyo et al. (2002) Collected evidences that support many medicinal plants

species found in Jozani Forest in Zanzibar. More than 30 species of herbal plants

recorded were used by local community to cures various diseases using similar

medicinal plants found at Jozani forest reserve. Some of medicinal plants found in

Jozani reserve Zanzibar lists in Table 4.

26

Table 4: Medicinal trees found at Jozani forest reserve

Medicinal trees. Parts used Diseases treated

Abrus precatorius, Roots, barks and

fruits

Asthma, skin diseases,

eye infections and

worms

Datura fastuosa,

Adansonia digitata

Soriendeia madagascarensi

Roots and barks Malaria, T.B, coughs,

reduce blood pressure,

worms. Rauvolfia mombasiana

Drypetes natalensis, Flueggia

virosa, Senna petersiana

Roots, barks and

leaves

Cold and fever ,

pregnancy conditions

and cough

Tacca leontopetaloides Roots Diarrhea

Rhu longipes, Leaves, roots and

barks

Gum and children fever

Solanum trepidan

, Bersama abyssinica

Punicum trichocladum,

Adansonia digitata.

Roots, barks and

leaves

Eyes

Eugenia jambolana Leaves Vomiting and flue

Senna petersiana Roots Flue

Antidesma venosum,

AnnonanSenegalensis

Roots and leaves Snake bite

Suregada zanzibarensis Leaves and roots Skin diseases and

Asthma

Senna petersiana Roots Hernia

Abrusprecatorius,Olea

woodiana, Sida spp.

Roots, fruits and

leaves

Coughing and fever

Adonsonia digitata Barks Small pox

Source: Nahonyo et al. (2002)

27

2.2.10 Knowledge Gap

Harvesting of medicinal plants in many developing countries remain prominent

concern for plenty of wild medicinal species, without control on the exact quantity

harvested over time or the place of harvest may lead to decline and extinctions of

medicinal trees (Kuipers, 1995; Cunningham et al., 1993). Over-exploitation of

medicinal trees because of growing demand on local, national and international

markets (Cunningham 1993; Kuipers et al., 1997). Bark exploitation has caused

serious damage to wild populations of medicinal trees like Prunus africana,

including trees inside forests of high conservation value in Madagascar and

Cameroon (Cunningham et al., 2002).Zanzibar Island located off the coast of

mainland Tanzania, has a thriving culture of traditional medicine (MHZ, 2008).

Traditional medicine has experience a part of history in Zanzibar. Through the

review of theories and concepts explained about medicinal trees, there is inadequate

knowledge about diversity of medicinal trees in Unguja Central District of Zanzibar.

Therefore the current study was to investigate the impact of extraction of herbal

medicine on diversity of medicinal trees in Unguja selected villages of Marumbi and

Uroa in Central District of Zanzibar.

2.3 Conceptual Frame-work

Medicinal tree is the research topic which is assessed by measuring characteristics of

harvesting of medicinal trees diversity. Thus parameters of indices diversity of

medicinal trees and things influence the extraction of medicinal trees at Uroa and

Marumbi forests. There are many causes of extraction of medicinal trees such as

extraction for trade, extraction for self uses, extraction by traditional herbalist,

natural influence extraction and anthropogenic activities.

28

Marumbi and Uroa have coral rag forests which consist of diversity of medicinal

trees that are decreasing due to extraction and anthropogenic activities. Traditional

healers, herbal traders and self-users are reported to extract medicinal resources of

the two villages which undermine medicinal trees of the two forests.

2.3.1 Independent variable

Independent variables are those that affect diversity of medicinal trees of the two

village‟s forests. The extraction of diversity of medicinal trees is involving

harvesting for sell, self-user and herbal healers. These extraction drivers of medicinal

trees changes indices of medicinal trees. The diversity indices such as Shannon-

wiener index of diversity and Simpson‟s index of dominance.

2.3.2 Intermediate variables

The intermediate variables are between independent and dependent. These include

natural influence like flood, diseases, drought and other human factors like

agriculture.

2.3.3 Dependent variable

The dependent variables are measured, and that is influenced or changed by the

independent variable. Medicinal trees diversity is dependent variable which is

affected by human activity specifically extraction medicinal trees diversity. Drivers

are economy, diseases faces society, cultural drivers, tourism and spiritual practice.

The result of the drivers is decreasing, declining and rarity of medicinal tree species.

It also includes change of species richness, evenness, abundance and final extinctions

of species. The effect of extraction of medicinal trees will affect economy, socially,

ecologically and environment of the natural forest of two villages.

29

Figure 1: Conceptual frame-work

30

CHAPTER THREE

3.0 Research methodology

3.1 Description of Study Area

The current study was conducted in two villages namely, Marumbi and Uroa Central

District of Unguja Island. The study was done in two selected villages which were

Marumbi and Uroa both villages are in Unguja Island. Marumbi and Uroa villages

are both located at the edge eastern region at Unguja Island about 25 km from

Zanzibar town (Figure 2). Both villages have coral rag forest which is the dominant

forest type in eastern Zanzibar, this is based on coral rag (ancient, reef) substrate,

characterized by shallow, alkaline top soils and showing a species composition

comparable to that of the Tanzanian coastal forests (Adrian et al., 2000).The two

forests villages is located between 390 25‟ 30‟ East to 390 28”20‟ while 60 9‟10‟ to

6012” south.

3.1.1 Economic activities

Uroa and Marumbi villages lie at coastal region eastern part of Unguja Island. People

in these villages are involved in farming and fishing activities. Human growth in the

villages are increased human needs and thus intensifies pressures on forest resources.

Due to limited arable land in the Islands, extensive clearance of natural forest occurs

(TGC, 2014).While the people at Marumbi village are most of them farmers and

other involved in fishing activities. Small part of Marumbi forest village is conserved

and large part is under pressure of human activities where the study has been under

taken.

31

Source: Survey Section of Department of Forestry, Zanzibar

Figure 2: Map location of Uroa forest study area

3.1.2 Demography

According to NBS, (2013) census is the most recent census for which results have

been reported. The total population of Zanzibar is 1303,569 with an annual growth

rate of 2.8 percent. The population of, which was the largest city, is 223,033. Around

two thirds of the people 896721 lived on Unguja (Zanzibar Island), with the greatest

proportion settled in the densely populated west. The population of Pemba Island is

406848, (NBS, 2013).

32

Marumbi village is located at coastal region close to Uroa village (Figure 3).

Source: Survey Section of Department of Forestry, Zanzibar

Figure 3: Location to show Marumbi forest study area

3.1.2.1 Central district Population

The total population of central District of Unguja is 76346 with males about 38538

and females 37808. The study was done in two villages including Uroa and

Marumbi. Table 5: displays population distribution in study area.

33

Table 5: Human ppopulation as of 2013

Village Males (N) Females (N) Total

Uroa 1323 1290 2613

Marumbi 590 1,167 1757

Source: (NBS, 2013).

3.1.3 Climate

The main rainy season occurs between March and June. The short rains usually start

in October and ends in December. However, some inter-monsoonal precipitation

takes place. The average rainfall for the island is about 1500 mm per annum. The

highest temperature occurs during the short dry season with a maximum mean of

33°C in Unguja and 29°C in Pemba. The minimum temperatures for Unguja and

Pemba are 23.3°C and 21.1°C, respectively. In December to March is generally hot

and dry. While April and Mid of June is wet because of the long rains. July to

August is dry and breezy with little rainfall October - November is when the short

rains appear (Nahonyo et al., 2005).

3.1.4 Geology and Soils

Marumbi and Uroa are found 3km distance from each village. The topography is flat

terrain of about 20m to 30m above mean sea level (Nahonyo et al., 2005). The soil

lie within the shallow, acidic, infertile, rocky coral rag soils in the eastern part of the

Unguja which is named the darker "Kinongo" soils, derived from limestone parent

materials, are found towards east and south of the Island (Nahonyo et al., 2005). The

forest falls within coral rag terrain that lies from south of Unguja island pass through

Marumbi and Uroa forests to north of Unguja island (Nahonyo et al., 2002; Kombo

2010).

34

3.1.5 Vegetation

The study areas are characterized by typical coast rag forest of indigenous plant

species vegetation commonly dominated by Suregada zanzibarensis, Encephalartos

spp., Euclea spp., Diospyros spp., Macphersonia spp., Eugenia spp., Mystroxylon

spp., Psychotria bibracteatum, Encephalartos spp., Macpharsonia spp., Ozoroa spp.,

Terminalia boivinii, Mimusopsis fruticosa, Calophyllum inophyllum, Polysphaeria

parvifolia, Diospyros kabuyeana, Ludia mauritiana, Combretum schumannii,

Dalbergia spp., Drypetes spp., Strychnos henningsii, Scorodophloeus fischeri,

Afzelia quanzensis, and Lecaniodiscus fraxinifolius (Nahonyo et al., 2002:Kombo et

al., 1998).

3.2 Research design

According to Kothari (2004) research design is the arrangement of condition for

collection and analysis of data in a manner that aims to combine relevant to research

purposes. The design of this study is completely randomized design (CRD) with

circular tree sampling plots (radius = m) were established systematically along

transect in both Uroa and Marumbi villages of Unguja Island. Inventory of medicinal

trees was counted by an ethno botanical survey among communities of neighboring

the two forests.

3.3 Sampling Frame and Sampling size

The sampling frame of this study has been expected to be 3780 for Marumbi and

Uroa villages. Sampling frame is an overall total number of people in the study site

(Kothari, 2004). Uroa had about 2613 population and 1,167 are from Marumbi

village. Respondents were interviewed and questioned on impact of extraction of

35

herbal medicine on medicinal trees species diversity. The sample size was 44

respondents as computed from a formula by Kothari (2004):

2)(1 eN

Nn

.

3.4 Data collection methods

Both qualitative and quantitative data collection approaches were adopted. Primary

data was collected through interviews and semi structured questionnaires, matrix

ranking and field survey. Responses from the interviews were supplemented by

ethno-botanical survey of important medicinal tree species. Respondents like

traditional healers, herbalist and local peoples were source of information of primary

data. Ethno-botanical data was collected using semi-structured interviews and

medicinal trees were observed. Secondary data was collected as publications, reports

and relevant studies. Moreover, the existing publications, reports and other official

documents relating to the subject were used for secondary information

3.5 Data collection tools

3.5.1 Ethno-botanical Surveys

Ethno botanical surveys were collected using semi structured questionnaire and

interviews. Traditional healers and herbalist were randomly selected at Uroa and

Marumbi villages. According to Martin, (1995) Data collected on the use of

medicinal trees, plants parts used, collection techniques and diseases treated are

better method of ethno-botany survey. Information of threat of some medicinal trees

using interviews and field observation were provided. Total of 13 traditional healers

and 15 herbal sellers were selected as key informants and interviewed for detailed

information about extraction of medicinal trees.

36

3.5.2 Questionnaires

A questionnaire is a research tool consisting of a series of questions and other

prompts for the purpose of gathering data from the study area (Oulu, 2002).Semi

structured questionnaires were used with forest officers, local community and herbal

sellers who use the forests to collect medicinal trees. These questions includes

identification of methods of extraction, magnitude extraction, prevailing diseases

treated, type of forest they used for collection and recording priority medicinal plants

and threats of medicinal trees due to over-harvesting.

3.5.3 Interviews

An interview is particularly useful for getting the data on participants behind

participants‟ experiences (White, 2002).The interview can provide in-depth

information around the topic, and be useful as follow-up for some respondents to

questionnaires. In this study, interview has been used to probe more information on

diversity of medicinal trees, priority herbal medicine used in the villages, rare

species, area of collection, extent of extraction and which effect would be emerged in

the community if certain medicinal trees become lost or rare. Also interviews have

helped to grasp information about the commercial of medicinal plants and the

threatened species. Traditional healers and Herbal sellers were centered part of the

current study interviews.

3.5.4 Matrix Ranking

Preference ranking technique was used to assess the degree of threatened species of

some selected medicinal trees (White, 2002). In this exercise, each informant was

asked to rank items based on degree of scarcity, availability and priority of medicinal

plants in the area) and their degree of importance. The most important or preferred

37

species (in this case the most threatened medicinal plants) were assigned the highest

score, while the least preferred or abundant species was given the lowest. The

selected respondents were healers, herbal sellers, and local community and forest

officers. Then the degree is assessed according to ranking of species as threatened

(rarity), priority and plenty (availability).

3.5.5 Plant identification

The plant identification is very important for verification of medicinal trees species.

Botanist from Forest Department has been used to identify medicinal species and

their family. Using a botanist had compared and identified a specimen collected with

required specimen for accurate naming, such as flowers, fruits, seeds, roots and

normal leaves of the particular medicinal plants whose identities have been verified

by specialists over many years. Some samples of medicinal plants were collected and

many medicinal trees were identified by Botanist. Establishing plots in the field has

emphasized visual medicinal trees species and grasp knowledge of naming medicinal

trees by local names using traditional healers. Image of samples of some herbal trees

were taken in the field for further evidences.

3.5.6 Field Survey Method

Field method is essential to identify the habitats present in a study area, to record the

locations of habitats (Green et al., 1996) Also to identify each feature of location (e.

g. each habitat type). Field surveys were carried out at Uroa reserve forest and

Marumbi as community forests to identify diversity of medicinal trees, area of

collection and to assess the general extent of extraction of medicinal trees. The

quantitative objective in this study is answered using plots established in two forest

study area together with help from Forest department of Zanzibar. Diversity of

38

herbal medicinal species was obtained and was verified to test their quantity and

accuracy.

3.5.7 Field Procedure

The current research was conducted in two village forests of Marumbi and Uroa

designed to conduct Medicinal trees inventory work excluding non-wood medicinal

trees. A total of 99 circular plots were established systematically in both forests.

Marumbi 64 plots and Uroa 35 plots, similarly radius of 11.28 m was preferred.

Marumbi had 365 m and Uroa 449 m which were the distance between plots. Sample

plots were identified by using Garmin GPS map. Field plot points in the two forests

were done by using GPS instrument Garmin extrex 29. All trees in the plots were

counted and identified. Each GPS point was recorded to correct missing data and

medicinal trees were recognized using healers excluding non-wood trees. TGC,

(2014) recorded forest area of Uroa has 706.3 ha as forest reserve and Marumbi has

853.2 ha forest community. The guideline of plot computation inventory work was

provided by Husch, (2002).Similar data were described by Malimbwi et al.(1994)

recorded in a data collection sheet (Appendix 4) for calculations to get stand

parameters that were used for identification and data analysis.

39

Table 6: Tree sampling parameters for Marumbi and Uroa village forests,

Central district, Unguja

Parameter Marumbi Uroa

Forest area (ha) 853.2 706.3

Sampling intensity (i; %) 0.3 0.2

Transects (N) 6 11

Plots (N) 64 35

Plot radius (m) 11.28 11.28

Inter- plot distance (m) 365 449

Plot area (ha) 0.04 0.04

Sampled area (ha) 2.5 1.4

3.6 Diversity indices

According to Smith et al.(2001) Simpson index: The equation used to calculate

Simpson‟s index was D = ∑ (pi) 2. Where, D = Simpson index as pi = the proportion

of important value of the ith species (pi = ni / N, ni is the important value index of ith

species and N is the important value index of all the species). As D increases,

diversity decreases and Simpson‟s index is therefore usually expressed as 1 – D or 1/

D (Smith et al., 2001).

40

Source: (2015) Survey Section of Department of Forestry, Zanzibar

Figure 4: Map plot layout of Uroa Forest reserve

Tree species diversity was computed using Shannon -Wiener index of diversity (H‟);

H‟=-∑si=1 pi ln (pi) (Kreb 1985).

Where: pi is the proportion of individuals belonging to the i-th species calculated as

pi = S/N; ln is logarithms (base), S is the number of individuals of one species, and

N is the total number of all individuals in the sample (Kreb, 1985). Simpson

41

reciprocal starts with 1 as the lowest figure which represent few species, so the

higher the value the greater the diversity (Smith et al., 2001).

Source: (2015) Survey Section of Department of Forestry, Zanzibar

Figure 5: Map plot layout of Marumbi forest

42

3.6.1 Tree species diversity

The data of tree species diversity include Simpson‟s Index of dominance (C) and

Shannon-Wiener Index of diversity (H), the data collected by establishing circular

plots of 0.04 ha, followed by identifying all trees within the plots and their number

was recorded for further processing and analysis.

3.6.2 Simpson’s Index of dominance

Data for Simpson‟s index of dominance adopted circular plots of 0.04 ha which were

established at distance of 365 m Marumbi forest along the transects that are set at

449 m for Uroa forest inter-transect distance, all trees within the plots counted and

identified for further processing and analysis. Shannon-Wiener index of diversity is

the same as for Simpson‟s index of dominance which is adopted circular plots of

0.04 ha and similar measures of inventory work of the current study.

3.7 Data Analysis

After collecting data in the study area, the data were checked against their answers in

order to ensure the consistency of information collected. After data refinement, the

analyses of the data were followed whereby the data from questionnaires were coded

into specific categories leading to the generation of simple statistics such as

frequencies and percentages. Collected data were summarized and analyzed using

Statistical Packages for Social Sciences (SPSS.17) and Microsoft Excel 2007.

Irrelevant data were discarded while missing gaps were filled through personnel

contact in the field. The data were then descriptively and quantitatively analyzed.

Frequency distribution tables and computation of proportions in percentage was used

in analyzing the socioeconomic variables for the respondents.

43

3.7.1 Determination of tree indices of diversity

Tree indices of diversity include Simpson‟s index of dominance and Shannon index

of diversity.

3.7.2 Simpson’s index of dominance

Sampson‟s index of dominance was computed using Microsoft Excel spread sheet by

using formula: C = Σ (ni/N) 2

(Misra, 1988). Where C is the Index of dominance

Σ is the summation symbol

ni is the number of individual species sampled

N is the total number of all species in the sample.

3.7.3 Shannon-Wiener index of diversity

Shannon-Wiener index of diversity was computed using Microsoft Excel 2007

spread sheet by using formula: H‟ = -Σ (pi ln pi) (Kent, 1992).

Where: H‟ is the Shannon-Wiener index of diversity

Σ is the Summation sign

pi is the proportion of individual species

ln = natural logarithm

3.7.4 Data quality and control

Data quality control is crucial so as to make research perceived. To ensure this, two

aspects were observed namely; validity and reliability.

3.7.5 Validity

Validity is the process whereby an empirical measure adequately reflects the real

meaning of the concepts under consideration (Babbie, 1998).Validity in this research

achieved through proper identification of research problem, building a theoretical

44

perspective on the medicinal trees use an impact of extraction of medicinal trees

diversity as well as using secondary information to guide the research processes. In

order to achieve the validity of the study, the scientific research process such as

identifying gap of knowledge clearly identified by designing the research problem

and undertaking the research process. Data of the study obtained are valid, since

resembles with the findings of other similar studies.

3.7.6 Reliability

Reliability is a matter of whether a particular technique is applied repeatedly to some

object would yield the same results each time (Babbie, 1998). Reliability of this

research study achieved by carefully constructing research tools like questionnaires,

matrix ranking and interviews as well as field survey and computation procedures

was done to ensure reliable data were recorded. Improper data and irrelevant

information were corrected through contact communication in order to put the

required information.

45

CHAPTER FOUR

RESULTS PRESENTATION AND DISCUSSION OF THE FINDINGS

This chapter presents results, interpretation and analysis of the findings on effect of

extraction of herbal medicine on diversity of medicinal trees at villages of Marumbi

and Uroa central district of Unguja Island.

4.1 Results

Results are presented on medicinal tree species diversity and socio-demographic

characteristics, observing the effect of extraction of herbal medicine involved by

traditional healers with herbal sellers and the community. The findings also assess

the magnitude extraction of medicinal trees in the two villages.

4.1.1 Medicinal Trees species diversity

Total of 6051 Medicinal trees in 99 plots was sampled in two village forests.

Marumbi was 3920 Trees and 2201 trees at Uroa. Sum of 55 Medicinal trees species

were identified which belongs to 28 families. Table 7 lists the average measurements

of medicinal trees obtained in establishing plots.

Shannon wiener index of diversity, Simpson index were used to calculate medicinal

tree species diversity and abundance. The result at Uroa medicinal trees species

diversity was 3.106 while Marumbi medicinal trees species diversity was 2.89952.

Results on tree species diversity indices are indicated in Table 8.

46

Table 7: The values of tree stocking and species richness

Forest Plots (N) Stems/ha Species Richness

Marumbi forest 64 1,530 39

Uroa forest 35 1,570 55

Table 8: Diversity indices of medicinal trees

Village forest D H E ( Evenness) Richness

Marumbi 0.108 - 0.287 1.44 – 2.89 0.830 - 0.952 39

Uroa 0.137 – 0.327 1.51 – 3.10 0.730 – 0.968 55

4.1.1.1 Forest tree inventory and medicinal trees assessment

A total number of 55 medicinal trees species and 28 families occurred on two

villages study forest plots. The density of each tree species was recorded by counting

the number of individuals and the frequency of each medicinal tree was recorded as

the percentage of plots that included the species. The estimations of medicinal plants

diversity and dominance were carried out using Species richness, Shannon–Wiener

diversity index (H),Simpson index of diversity (D) and Shannon evenness (E) with

Simpson index of dominance(C).Table 9 (a) and 9 (b): present results of diversity of

medicinal trees species which belong to 28 families at Uroa and Marumbi forests.

47

Table 9 (a): Medicinal Trees species indigenous to Marumbi and Uroa Village

forests, central District, Unguja

SN Species Vernacular Family

1 Caesalpinia bonducella Mkomwe Caesalpinaceae

2 Pittosporum viridiflorum Mpande Pittosporaceae

3 Monanthotaxis fornicate Mchofu Annonaceae

4 Croton sylvaticus Msinduzi Euphobiaceae

5 Teclea simplicifolia Mcheza mwitu Rutaceae

6 Euclea natalensis Msiliza Ebenaceae

7 Vernonia zanzibarensis Mtumbaku mwitu Compositae

8 Drypetes natalensis Mjafari Euphpbiaceae

9 Polyphaeria porvifolia Mlapaa Rubiaceae

10 Flueggea virosa Mkwamba Phyllanthaceae

11 Eugnea spp. Mkaaga Myrtaceae

12 Euphorbia nyikae Mkweche Euphobiaceae

13 Mollotus oppositifolia Mtumbika Rubiaceae

14 Soriendeia madagascariensis Mpilipili doria Anacardiaceae

15 Macphersonia gracilis Mjoma Spindaceae

16 Suredada zanzibarensis Mdimsitu Euphobiaceae

17 Annona senegalensis Mtopetope Annonaceae

18 Mimusops obtusifolia Mnyovuo Sapotaceae

19 Sterculia Africana Muoza Sterculiaceae

20 Rapanea melanophloes Mkangara shamba Primulaceae

21 Rhus longipes Mchengele Anacardiaceae

22 Rhus natalensis Mkumba Anacardiaceae

23 Myternus mossanbicensis Mnusi Clastraceae

24 Fiscur spp. Mkuyu Moraceae

25 Sideroxylon inerme Mkandika Sapotaceae

26 Dodonea viscose Mkeneta dume Sapindaceae

27 Bersama abyssinica Muangakau Meliaceae

28 Dichrostrachys cinerea Mgunga Mimosaceae

48

Table 9 (b): Medicinal Trees species indigenous to Marumbi and Uroa Village

forests, central District, Unguja (Continued)

SN Species Vernacular Family

29 Psidium punctuate Mkeneta jike Compositae

30 Trema orientalis Mpesu Canabaceae

31 Senna petersiana Mpingaume Caesalpinaceae

32 Turrea floribunda Mtamagoa Meliaceae

33 Croton psudopulchellus Mgeuka Euphobiaceae

34 Clausena anisata Muavikali Rutaceae

35 Carpodiptera Africana Muanga Sterculiaceae

36 Cussonia zimmerimanii Mtoto Araliaceae

37 Hoslundia opposita Mlashore Ebenaceae

38 Ozorora obavata Mngombe Anacardiaceae

39 Terminalia boivinii Mkunguni Combreatacae

40 `Leoniodiscus fraxinifolius Mbuyu mwaka Sapindaceae

41 Bridelia micrantha Mkaati Euphobiaceae

42 Psychotria bracteat Mkonge Rubaceae

43 Strychnos inncua Mtonga loganiaceae

44 Flacourtia indica Mgo Flacourtiaceae

45 Olea wodiana Mpweza/ mlimbo Oleaceae

46 Monodora grandidieri Mchofu dume Annonaceae

47 Euclea racemosa Mdaa Ebeneceae

48 Strychnos spinosa Mtongo Loganiaceae

49 Euphobia tirukali Mtofua macho Euphobiaceae

50 Fiscus expinosa Msasa/ Mchopaka Moraceae

51 Mystroxylon aethiopicum Kifugu Celastaceae

52 Toddalia asiatica Mnywa Rutaceae

53 Albizia adianthifolia Mkenge Fabaceae

54 Rawsonia lucida Mpera mwitu Flacourtiaceae

55 Ludia Mauritius Mchangachanga Flacourtiaceae

49

4.1.1.2 Simpson’s index of dominance

The highest dominance average at Uroa was 0.037 while Marumbi was 0.025. Some

medicinal trees are more dominant at Marumbi and some at Uroa. The results show

that dominant species of medicinal trees species were similar in both forests patches,

these includes Polyphaeria parvifolia, Macphersonia gracilis, Euclea natalensis,

Suregada zanzibarensis, Euclea racemosa fiscuss spp. and Fluggea virosa. Some

medicinal trees are absent at Marumbi forest, example Croton sylvaticus, drypetes

natalensis, vernonia zanzibarensis and Teclea simplicifolia which were obtained at

Uroa forest reserve only. Table 10: present value of Simpson‟s index of dominance.

50

Table 10: Dominant value (C) of medicinal trees

Species C

Marumbi Forest Uroa Forest

Polysphaeria porvifolia 0.18 0.14

Macphersonia gracilis 0.14 0.13

Euclea natalensis 0.101 0.11

Suregada zanzibarensis 0.065 0.067

Euclea racemosa 0.045 0.061

Fiscus spp. 0.050 0.036

Eugnia uniflora 0.040 0.029

Myternus mossambicensis 0.026 0.031

Flueggea virosa 0.027 0.066

Mollotus opporsitifolia 0.022 0.079

Clausena anisata 0.010 0.015

Bersama abyssinica 0.0066 0.022

Caesalpinia bonducella - 0.001

Croton psudochellus - 0.021

Croton sylvaticus - 0.00046

Flacourtia indica 0.0015 0.0084

Mean 0.05493 0.05105

Std 0.0522 0.0447

Source: Field data 2015

4.1.2 Socio-demographic analysis of respondents

Socio-demographic characteristics of the respondent that were investigated among

the selected respondent include gender and education. The total number of the

respondents involved in this study were 48 being twenty three (23) from Marumbi

and twenty five from (25) Uroa.

51

4.1.2.1 Sex of respondents

The gender of respondents that were asked during this study about the use of

medicinal trees in two villages is presented in the Table 11. Results show that most

of respondents (62.5 %) asked were male and the remaining (37.5 %) were female.

Table 11: Sex of respondents

Gender Frequency (N) %

Male 30 62.5

Female 18 37.5

Total 48 100

4.1.2.2 Level of education

The levels of education of the respondents are shown in the Table 12. The results

indicate that 54.2 % have attained secondary education, about 18.8 % has informal

education, 16.7 % have attained primary education and 10.4 % completed tertiary

education. This imply that very few respondents completed tertiary education while

the herbalist and healers rely heavily on their informal knowledge when extract

medicinal trees.

Table 12: Level of education of the respondents

Level of Education Frequency Percent (%)

Informal education 9 18.8

Primary education 8 16.7

Secondary education 26 54.2

University 5 10.4

Source: Field data, 2015.

52

4.1.3 Extent of extraction of medicinal trees

The study has exposed magnitude extraction of medicinal trees which is obtained

from herbal sellers, traditional healers and local community. Healers, herbalist and

herbal dealers perceive value of each medicinal tree and the knowledge which

determines frequency of collection.

4.1.3.1 Extraction and use of herbal medicine

The significance use of herbal medicine in the two communities is accepted, which

offer treatment of many ailments. Results of extraction and utilizing of herbal

medicine in the two villages are presented in Figure 6. Respondents indicate that self

users of medicinal trees entails herbal sellers 41.7 % (20) while local community

forms 27.1 % (13) and tradition anal healers are 31 % (15).

Figure 6: Extraction and use of medicinal trees

53

4.1.3.2 Harvesting Medicinal trees parts

The harvesting of medicinal trees is involved all plants organs including roots,

flowers, fruits, seeds, and leaves, barks and resins. Harvesting medicinal trees parts

is presented in Figure 7. About 39.6 % (19) consider all parts of plant organs are

important for treatment of human ailments, total of 35.4 % (17) respondents prefer

seed, fruit and leaves during collection while 25 % (12) often collect barks and roots.

Harvesting sites of medicinal trees is taking place in community forest and forest

reserve of the two villages. Result shows both forest are used to harvest medicinal

trees. The findings denote that about 52 % of respondents use village forests to

harvest medicinal trees while 47.9 % use both reserve and village forests.

Figure 7: Harvesting parts of medicinal trees

54

4.1.3.3 Frequency collection of medicinal trees

The collection of medicinal trees is often done depending on the need of the herbal

collectors. The result found that about 18.8% of the respondents collect medicinal

trees each week but 20.8% collect once per month while majority 60.4% collect any

time when they need medicine.

4.1.3.4 Collection of Priority medicinal trees

Some medicinal trees are more collected in the forest because they are better for

treating multiples of diseases. These are priority medicinal trees which were listed

and identified during matrix ranking and interviews with local peoples, Traditional

healers and herbal sellers. Majority of respondents mentioned Toddalia asiatica 72.9

% and Monanthotaxis fornicata 62.2 % while 45.8 % Pittosporum viridiflorum and

Teclea simplicifolia is 41.6 %.

Figure 8: Frequency collections of medicinal trees

55

Figure 9: Priority medicinal trees

Plate 1: Priority medicinal trees (A) Monanthotaxis fornicata (B) Teclea

simplicifolia

56

4.1.3.5 Medicinal trees parts used for trade

The plant parts used to treat human disease varied from species to species and from

disease to disease. Leaf, root, seed, bark and sap are widely used for treating human

diseases. Result shows roots were the most frequently used plant parts (66 %)

followed by barks and leaves (22.9 %) and the last are fruits, flower with seeds

which hold (12.5 %).

Figure 10: Medicinal trees parts used for trade

57

Plate 2: Herbal shop sells (A) roots (B) barks of Pittosporum viridiflorum

Table 13: Threatened medicinal trees

Botanic name Local

name

Parts used Diseases treated

Pittosporum viridiflorum Mpande Bark, roots,

leaves

Stomach ache, skin

diseases, and anemia,

prevents abortion in

women.

Monanthotaxis fornicata Mchofu Roots, bark,

leaves

Fever, cough, stomach

aches, headaches.

Croton sylvaticus Msinduzi Bark, roots,

leaves,

seeds

Swelling hernia, Tb,

bleeding gum, abdominal

pain, uterus complication

Teclea simplicifolia Mchenza

mwitu

Bark, roots,

leave

Spiritual remedy, Malaria,

Premature baby, tooth

ache, cough, stomach ache

Vernonia zanzibarensis Mtumbaku

mwitu

Roots, bark,

leaves, seed

Spiritual remedy. Kidney

problem, hernia, fever,

influenza, dysmenorrhea.

Drypetes natalensis

Mjafari Bark, leaves,

flower, roots

Snake bite, Malaria, STD,

inflammation, ulcer,

diarrhea etc.

Source: Field data, 2015

58

4.1.3.6 Threatened medicinal trees

Priority medicinal trees are threatened due to over-harvesting. This activity is

influencing the scarcity of PMTs. Results show that respondents mentioned drypetes

natalensis 68.7 % as the rarest followed by Croton sylvaticus 60 %, Vernonia

zanzibarensis 52 %, and Pittosprum viridiflorum 50 %, Teclea simplicifolia 39.5 %

and Monanthotaxis fornicata 14 %.The following Table 13: displays 6 medicinal

trees which are difficult to find them in forests zone due to over-harvesting.

4.1.4 Methodology of Harvesting Medicinal trees

The methods of exploitation of medicinal trees resources vary depending on the

quality of medicinal trees. The respondents use different methods of collection

medicinal trees in the community. For example 37.5 % of the respondents use

uprooting and 37.5 % use methods including uprooting, bark stripping and cutting

the trees. Among 16.6 % pick any plant organ depending on their treatments while

10.4% extract bark, seeds, leaves and fruits.

Table 14: Methods of collection medicinal trees

Methods of collection of Medicinal Trees Frequency (N) %

Uprooting 18 37.5

Extract fruits, seeds, leaves and bark 3 6.25

Pick any plant organ 9 18.75

Use all methods 18 37.5

Source: Field data, 2015

59

Plate 3: Herbalists display uprooting method of MTs

4.1.4.2 Reasons for declining medicinal trees

Over-harvesting practiced by traditional healers, herbal sellers and the local

community lead to decline, rarity and losses of many species of medicinal trees.

About 39.6 % of respondents believed the availability of some medicinal trees is

difficult. Result of respondents show that 56% herbal sellers contributing to decline

medicinal tree while 23.8% traditional healers, 14.6% self users and 5.6% other

reasons including anthropogenic activities might be adding reasons of degrading

medicinal trees.

60

Figure 11: Reasons for declining medicinal trees.

4.1.4.3 Effect of improper harvesting medicinal trees

Decline or losses of medicinal trees could bring adverse outcome to the surrounding

villages. Figure 12: present adverse outcome because of depleting medicinal trees.

Results from respondents denote 37.5 % believe economic effect could arise while

33.3 % health security effect could appear and 27.1 % ecological effect could result

but only 2.1 % believe other bad consequences could happen. These effects are about

to happen when certain medicinal trees become lost or decline.

61

Figure 12: Effects of improper harvesting Medicinal trees

Plate 4: Show rarity medicinal trees (A) Croton sylvaticus (B) Drypetes

natalensis

62

4.1.5 Conservation measures of medicinal trees

Sustainable harvesting of medicinal trees has been suggested so as to rescue the rich

medicinal tree diversity of the Unguja Island About 33.3 % of respondents

suggesting replanting (restoration) the medicinal trees will be useful measure to

prevent declining MTs. About 27.1 % of the respondents trust protection measures

of MTs would be better choice, while 20.8 % selected education measures could be

good idea of protecting MTs. The remaining 18.8 % of respondents believe

enforcing laws and against improper harvesting of MTs can be perfect measures for

protecting medicinal trees. Table 15: display conservation measures of medicinal

trees.

Table 15: Conservation measures of medicinal trees

Conservation measure Frequency(N) %

Protection medicinal trees 13 27.1

Enforce laws and policy 9 18.8

Replanting medicinal trees 16 33.3

Education 10 20.8

Total 48 100.0

Source: Field data, 2015

4.2 Discussion of the findings

This section discusses the findings of the study presented in section 4. The section is

divided into indices of diversity; extent extraction of medicinal trees and the findings

is discussed by interpretation of the presented results, reasoning the observations and

comparisons with other studies.

63

4.2.1 Medicinal Tree species diversity

The study has shown that plant species used in traditional medicine belongs to

different habits ranging from herbs, climbers and shrubs to big tree species. But the

current study has selected woody plant communities (trees and shrubs) which are

more used by the traditional healers than the non-woody (climbers and herbs)

communities, similar study done by Hamisy etal. (2000).

Species diversity and evenness was recorded using Shannon-Weiner index and

Simpson reciprocal index of diversity (1/D). Uroa had greater diversity of medicinal

trees which was ranged 3.106 (H) and Marumbi had 2.89 (H).This because part of

Uroa forest is conserved and many medicinal trees are available but Marumbi forest

is exposed directly on human activities such as agriculture TGC, (2014).The highest

Simpson reciprocal index was 13.3 for Uroa and lowest was 12.0 for Marumbi

showing higher Medicinal trees diversity at Uroa than Marumbi. The comparison

result is correlated with Adnan, (2011) and Aggimarangsee et al.(2005).The

measures of Shannon Evenness (E) look close for both forest village which range

from 0.7308-0.968 for Uroa and 0.830-0.952 for Marumbi forest. This is because the

abundance of medicinal tree species is common in both villages except for Uroa has

some rare species of medicinal trees. This implies that Uroa forest has high richness

and diversity of MTs. However, Marumbi forest has high relative abundances of

each species but low diversity and richness. The evenness of MTs of the two villages

is very close since most of the medicinal trees species look similar. Medicinal trees

such as Pittosporum viridiflorum, Vernonia zanzibarensis, Teclea simplicifolia and

Croton sylvaticus are only found in Uroa forest in very few populations. Total of 22

plots were found within farming zone and justifies that the two forests are under

pressure of human activities which pose serious threat of the diversity medicinal

64

trees existence. Marumbi forest is highly threatened due to the fact that all

anthropogenic activities are being done. This means that many species is being

cleared by collectors and human activities. The study result is related with Adnan et

al. (2009), Eleanor, (2002) and Shippmann et al. (2002); Cooper, (1985).

4.2.1.1 Index of dominance

Findings of index of dominance showed that the lowest average value of dominance

found at Marumbi was 0.0025 and Uroa was 0.037 forests and the highest value of

dominance medicinal trees species was Polysphaeria porvifolia 0.14 followed by

Macphersonia gracilis 0.13 and Euclea natalensis 0.11while the lowest value of

dominance found the rare medicinal trees species like Croton sylvaticus 0.0004 and

Caesalpinia bonducella 0.001.The value of index of dominance was similar to

Makame, (2013).Other studies, Monela at al. (2005); Bernado (2009); and Kaniki,

(2010),The greater the value the lower the dominance, it means few species

dominate the area, value ranges between 0 and 1 (Misra, 1988) Analysis showed that

medicinal tree species such as Suregada zanzibarensis, Rapanea melanosphores and

Macphersonia spp, have multiple uses such as firewood, medicine, fodder and

constructions, these species are at high risk according to Adrian et al.

(2008);Chhabra et al.(1987-1994).

4.3 Assessing extent of harvesting medicinal Trees.

Many people in Zanzibar extract herbal medicines due to increased prices and

shortages of drugs in the public sector. The demand for traditional medicine has been

increasing within the population (Ministry of Health Zanzibar, 2008). Study have

revealed that people engage in extraction of herbal medicine and other collect them

in villages forest and export them in Zanzibar town to the herbal shops. It is

65

widespread among healers and community that usage of herbal medicine for the

treatment and alleviation of (chronic) diseases is accepted (Chhabra et al.,

1994).Over-harvesting for trade, traditional healers and self-user verify the intensity

or magnitude which leads decline of MTs. Similar result exposed by Khamis ,(2011);

Roberson ,(2008).

Result confirmed that the most used medicinal trees parts are roots followed by barks

and leaves. Roots, leaves and barks are frequently sold in Zanzibar which means that

an improper collection method of medicinal trees is done, the more the frequency of

roots collection the higher the decline and the rarity of diversity of medicinal trees.

Method of uprooting kills many medicinal trees species. Root excavation and bark

striping were the most harmful harvesting methods (Cunningham, 1991) For

example, in India; bark stripping is reported to threaten the existence of Rauvolfia

serpent (Akerere, 1991) and Hamisy et al. (2000).

4.4 Impact of harvesting of Medicinal trees

Herbalists perceive each part of medicinal plants posses‟ variety of medicinal

properties thus herbal collectors needs many parts including fruits, seeds, leaves,

bark, roots, flowers and stems. Herbal trees parts reported on local collection of

plants from the surrounding forests or farms, the wild forests of two villages of

Marumbi and Uroa. This result is also justified by Baylor, (2015). The invalid

harvesting of medicinal trees is depleting medicinal trees in the two villages.

Traditional healers acquire knowledge of remedy of medicinal plant which decides

what part of herbal plant is useful for his or her patients. According to Lange et al.

(1997) harvest of medicinal plants involving roots, rhizomes; bulb, bark and stem

which have a serious effect on the survival of the mother plant in its habitat. An

66

effect of over-extraction of MTs is revealed in this study including economic effect,

health effect and ecological effects. Endashaw, (2007) cited threat of ecological

degradation, loss of indigenous knowledge and loss of cultural assets. An improper

collection of MTs keep susceptibility on species which varies in biological characters

such as different growth rates (slow growing vs. fast growing), reproductive systems,

(eg vegetative propagation; germination rates) and life forms (annual; perennial;

tree) Shippmann et al.(2002).The people may lose income when certain medicinal

trees disappear in the community. Example Croton sylvaticus and Drypetes

natalensis are classified endangered by IUCN (Nahonyo et al., 2002). Similar study

has mentioned that the increased demand for medicines has even led to local

extinction of certain medicinal trees such as Siphononchilus aethiopicus and

Warburgia salutatris outside the protected areas in KwaZulu-Natal in South Africa,

(Mander, 1997); Delvaux et al.(2009).

Healers expressed experience and comment on certain medicinal trees that may be

used the whole plant parts since the capacity of such plant on the treatment of the

illness is recognized. Giving example on Caesalpinia bonducella the plant seeds

treat dysmenorrhoea, malaria and trachoma while bark, leaves and roots can cure

fever with chest pain. Example of PMTs are used the whole plant parts because treat

multiples of ailments. Examples of priority medicinal trees under the study are

Pittosporum viridiflorum, Croton sylvaticus, and Toddalia asiatica and Vernonia

zanzibarensis. Over collection of some species for medicinal uses has resulted

decline of some medicinal trees in the village forests like Croton sylvaticus,

Caesalpinia bonducella, Pittosporum viridiflurm, Vernonia zanzibarensis, Teclea

simplicifolia, Drypetes natalensis and Mononthotaxis fornicate are both rarely seen

due to over-exploited for medicinal uses. Similar evidence founded by Nahonyo et

67

al. (2002). Data from the field observed that priority and rare medicinal trees have

extremely declined and threatened to extinction.

4.4.1 Methods of harvesting diversity of medicinal trees

The local community finds easier to harvest the roots and the bark of the medicinal

trees. Medicinal trees are threatened and many respondents confirmed that uprooting

method is removing the entire roots during harvest which lead to the death of the

plants. This is common method of harvesting for herbal sellers, traditional healers

and herbalist. The methods has contributed to decline Vernonia zanzibarensis,

Drypetes natalensis and Croton sylvaticus since the harvester excavate the entire

roots and kills the trees. Evidences are given by (Nahonyo et al., 2002; Adrian et al.,

2008; and Nahonyo et al., 2005; Khamis, 2011; Eleanor, 2002) Similar study of

uprooting and bark striping were the most harmful harvesting methods

(Cunningham, 1991).For example, in India, bark stripping is reported to threaten the

existence of Rauvolfia serpent (Akerele, 1991.The study discovered that some

people are involved in the trade of herbal trees collection which are sold at town for

high cost. Among the medicinal trees affected in the trade are Caesalpinia

bonducella, Toddalia asiatica, Teclea simplicifolia, Vernonia zanzibarenisis, and

Mononthotoxis fornicata and Pittosporum viridiflorm. This report is confirmed by

(Baylor et al., 2015;Eleanor 2002; Chantal, 2015).

The demands of harvesting the medicinal trees are getting higher due to increasing

price of modern medicine. Compared to other studies suggested that over-

exploitation, land use change threatens many medicinal plant species in Africa

(Anyinam 1995; Giday et al., 2003; Alves and Rosa, 2007). Some Traditional

healers extensively extract roots of Teclea simplicifolia and bark of Pittosporum

68

viridiflorum where the species of these medicinal trees are becoming too rare which

are obtained only in a few populations in the forest reserve of Uroa village. The loss

of medicinal plant resources can have serious consequences, as decreasing supplies

of wild medicinal plants affect the overall health security of people, especially in

Africa (Marshall, 1998). Moreover, herbal medicine provides a significant source of

income for rural people in developing countries. Therefore, a decreased availability

of medicinal plants can also impact local livelihoods (Augustino and Gillah, 2005;

McMillen, 2012; Chantal, 2015; Colebunders et al., 2003).

4.4.2 Collection medicinal trees for trade

Species such as Vernonia zanzibarensis, Toddalia asiatica and Teclea simplicifolia

are much affected by root excavation, so their populations have critically declined.

(Kombo et al., 2002);For example some studies of herbal medicine like Prunus

africana, a globally recognized treatment for prostate cancer, is now critically

endangered due to unsustainable harvesting for international sale (Cunningham,

1997; Stewart, 2003). For many species, the ecological impacts of harvesting are

unknown, and this lack of knowledge hinders the identification of sustainable

harvesting levels or methods (Grace et al., 2002; Ticktin 2004; Ghimire et al., 2005).

Lack of alternate income sources; push them to over-exploit natural resources of the

region. Improper collection methods threat many valuable medicinal herbs that are

becoming rare due to their utilization (Swe and Win, 2005).

69

Plate 5: Improper collection of medicinal trees

4.5 Conservations measures of medicinal trees

Protecting medicinal trees are accepted by most respondents in this study,

Traditional healers, herbal sellers, and most local community in Zanzibar are familiar

with Traditional Unit (Bazara la Tiba Asili) (TU), which was established by

government in 2009, that run under Zanzibar Traditional and Alternative Medicine

Policy Act, 2008:1; Larson, 2008) .This policy guide the contribution of traditional

healers and assure regulation , register, monitor, and protect medicinal resources

(Meier zu Biesen, Dilger and Nienstedt, 2012;Baylor,2015).Over-collection of

species poses a significant threat to some commercially valuable wild species and to

their habitats as well (IUCN, 2007). In addition about 15,000 medicinal plant species

may be threatened with extinction worldwide from overharvesting (IUCN, 2007).

Studies show that restoration can improve the situation for the conservation of native

species of biodiversity (Kanowski et al., 2005; Lamb et al., 2005).

70

CHAPTER FIVE

CONCLUSION, RECOMMENDATIONS AND AREAS FOR FURTHER

STUDY

5.1 Conclusion

The results of this study revealed diversity of medicinal trees exist in two village

forests and hence many people are involved in medicinal trees extraction. Majority

of respondent preferred using medicinal trees in the area. Both forests in two

village‟s people exploit herbal resources and trading in town. The result clarified the

data from plots and questionnaire, matrix ranking and interviews then found that

over-harvesting of medicinal trees is leading cause for decline and causing rarity of

diversity of medicinal trees in the area.

The current study has justified that anthropogenic activities is contributing and

eroding the medicinal trees in the surrounding forest zone. The forest is habitat for

diversity of medicinal trees but the anthropogenic activity is adding cause of forest

fragmentation which has kept medicinal trees in small population. Traditional healers

and herbal sellers clutch unsustainable methods of extraction of medicinal trees

which is upsetting and impede medicinal trees species. The method such as

uprooting the trees is always killing the medicinal trees, so this method gradually is

depleting the medical trees species. Majority of respondents recognize rare medicinal

trees and realize that some medicinal trees are declining or had become too rare.

Medicinal trees such as Drypetes natalensis, Vernonia zanzibarensis, Teclea

simplicifolia and Pittosporum viridiflorum are declining and have become too rare in

the study area. The respondents also identified the diversity of medicinal trees which

are priority MTs that cure many diseases and condition; similarly they also

71

mentioned medicinal trees which are difficult and are threatened to extinction

although, many other are plenty available in the near surrounding forest.

The result of this study had exposed that respondent accepted that the losses or

decline of certain species of medicinal trees could bring an adverse effect in the area.

The adverse effect including health, environment, ecological effect, socio-cultural

effect and economic effects but also the findings of current study has observed

change of species richness, evenness, relative abundance and declining of priority of

medicinal trees.

5.2 Recommendations

From the current study, the following recommendations are suggested:

1. Traditional healers and herbal collectors including herbal sellers should be

given education on sustainable extraction of medicinal trees.The Forest

Department of Zanzibar is responsible for instructing the herbal collectors on

sustainability.

2. The medicinal trees remedy continues to be used for many people in the

study area but the medicinal trees species active ingredient is not well

investigated. So the government could provide intensive investigation of

medicinal trees so as to identify safety.

3. The forest of the two villages are still under pressure of deforestation so the

government should provide enough security for reserve forest like Uroa

reserve forest in which plenty of medicinal trees that are declining.

4. It has been realized that medicinal trees are source of income for the local

residence but over-exploitation of this resource could undermine their

income. It is recommended highly that the local people are required to

72

perceive the existing of the medicinal trees in order to hold conservation

efforts on MTs.

5. The anthropogenic activities of the two forest is threatening existence of the

medicinal trees so it is recommended that the people be given alternative

source of income by government in order to let the natural forest grows for

future generation and only be used sustainably which will be better idea in

management of biological resources.

6. The demand for medicinal trees is getting large worldwide since many

companies have been benefited due to developing drugs using medicinal

trees. In such situation the government is required to conduct special research

project in medicinal trees so that to develop useful medical drugs that can be

used to improve government revenue.

7. The extracts of these plants should be further analyzed to isolate the specific

antibacterial principles in them.

5.3 Area for further study

1. Detail assessment of all medicinal plants and their well-being contribution to

the local community.

2. An experiment investigation of active ingredient of medicinal plants that

could be help to antibiotic-resistant diseases.

3. Extensive scientific investigation of better fighting diseases medicinal plants

that could be used to develop herbal drugs then to be sold in pharmacies.

4. Effect of invasive species on native medicinal plants.

5. Impact of improper harvesting of medicinal plants on biodiversity of selected

forest ecosystem.

73

REFERENCES

Adnan, M. and Holscher, D. (2011), Medicinal plants in old-growth, degraded and

re-growth forests of NW Pakistan. – Forest Ecology and Management

261 (11): 2105-2114.

Adrian V.ELY, Amour B.Omar, Ali U. Basha, Said A .Fakihi, Robert Wild, (2000),

A participatory study of wood harvesting industry of Charawe and

Ukongoroni united republic of Tanzania. Working paper 2000,

UNESCO, (South-South Co-operation Programme), Paris (France)

Ake Assi, L. (1988), Rare species at risk of extinction Ivory coast, Monogr. Syst.

Bot. Missouri Bot. Gard., 25, 461 - 463

Akerele, O., Heywood, V. and Synge, H. (1991), Conservation of Medicinal Plants,

Cambridge University Press

Alves, R, Rosa I, (2007), Biodiversity, traditional medicine and public health: where

do they meet? Journal of Ethno biology and Ethno medicine 3, 14.

Andrews, E.L. (1997), A Humble Herb as Rival to Prozac, International Herald

Tribune, Paris.

Anyinam, C. (1995), Ecology and Ethnomedicine: Exploring links between current

environmental crisis and indigenous medical practices. Social Science

and Medicine, 40:321 – 329.

Arias, T.D., (1999), Glosario de Medicamentos: desarollo, evaluacio˜n y uso,

Washington: Organizacio˜n Panamricana de La Salud. Organizacio˜n

Mundial de La Salud, p. 171.

Assefa and Tesfaye Abebe, (2014), Ethno botanical study of wild medical trees and

Assegid shrub in Benna Tsemay District, South Ethiopia, Journal of

science and Development.

Astin, J.A., (1998), “A review of the incorporation of complementary and alternative

medicine by mainstream physicians. Arch Intern Med. 1998 Nov 23;158

(21):2303-10. Review.

Augustino, S., Gillah, P.R. (2005), Medicinal Plants in Urban Districts of Tanzania:

Plants, Gender Roles and Sustainable Use. Int. For. Rev. 7, 44–58.

Babbie, E. (1998), The Practice of Social Sciences Research 9th

Education,

Wadsworth.

Barnett, A. (2006), “The New Piracy in Africa,” Guardian Weekly (UK), September

28, 2006.

74

Batugal, Pons A, Jayashree Kanniah, Lee Sok Young and Jeffrey T Oliver (eds).

(2004), Medicinal Plants Research in Asia, Volume 1: The Framework

and Project Work plans. International Plant Genetic Resources Institute

– Regional Office for Asia, the Pacific and Oceania (IPGRI-APO),

Malaysia.

Bausell, R.B, (2007), Snake Oil Science: The Truth About Complementary and

Alternative Medicine. Oxford University Press.

Baylor , (2015), Analysis of traditional medicine in Zanzibar, Resource conservation

and Public attitude towards the traditional and alternative medicine.

Independent Study Project (ISP) Collection. Paper 2050.http:// digital

collections. sit.edu/isp_collection/2050

Bernado, J. (2009), Forest cover and use changes under different tenure regimes: A

case of “ngitili”, Meatu District, Tanzania.

Brown, K. (2002), Innovations for conservation and development. The Geographical

Journal,Vol 168. pp 6-17.

Brown, T (1997), "Clearances and Clearings: Deforestation in Mesolithic/Neolithic

Britain" J Ethnopharmacol (1995), Traditional healers in Tanzania: the

perception of malaria and its causes.

C.L.Nahonyo, L.B. Mwansumbi, C.A. Msuyo, C.A.Masuo, T.B. Suya and C.

Shingwenda, (2005), Ngezi - Vumawimbi forest reserve biodiversity

inventory report. Department of Zoology and Marine Biology UDSM

Tanzania.

C.L.Nahonyo, L.B. Mwansumbi, S.Eliapenda, C.Msuya, C.Mwansasa, T.M.Suya,

B.O. Mponda and P. Kihaule, (2002), Jozani Chwaka Bay proposed

National Park biodiversity inventory report, Department of Zoology and

Marine Biology UDSM Tanzania.

Caroline Meirzu Bieseni, Hansjorg Dilger, Tanya Nienstedt, (2012), Bridging gaps

in health care healing, Traditional medicine and biomedical health care

sector in Zanzibar. Freie university Berlin Tanya Nienstedt, World

doctors

Chantal Posthouwer .,(2015), Medicinal Plants of Kariakoo Market, Dar es Salaam,

Tanzania, MSc specialization: Biology: Evolution, Biodiversity and

Conservation, Leiden University, Darwinweg 4, P.O. Box 9517, 2300

RA Leiden, The Netherlands.

Chhabra, S.C., R.L.A. Mahunnah and E.N. Mshiu (1987-1994), Plants Used in

Traditional Medicine in Eastern Tanzania. In: Journal of Ethno

pharmacology (21, 25, 28, 29, 33): 6 Pamphlets.

75

Colebunders R, Dreezen C, Florence E, Pelgrom Y, Schrooten W. (2003), The use of

complementary and alternative medicine by persons with HIV infection

in Europe. Euro support Study Group. Int J STD AIDS. 2003

Oct;14(10):672-4

Cooper, K.H. (1985), The Conservation Status of Forests in Transvaal, Natal and

OFS, South Africa. Durban, Wildlife Society of South Africa.

Cunningham S,B (1990), Man and Medicine the exploitation and conservation of

Traditional Zulu Medicine. Hamburg, Mitheilungen aus dem Institut fur

Allegemeine Botanik

Cunningham, A.B, Mbenkum, F.T (1993), Sustainability of harvesting Prunus

Africana bark in Cameroon: a medicinal plant in international trade.

People and Plants Working Paper 2, Division of Ecological Sciences,

UNESCO: Paris, France.

Cunningham, A.B. (1988), An investigation of the herbal medicine trade in

Natal/KwaZulu. Investigational Report No. 29. Institute of Natural

Resources, Pietermaritzburg.

Cunningham, A.B. (1991), Conservation of medicinal plants. In Development of a

Conservation Policy on Commercially Exploited Medicinal Plants: A

Case Study from Southern Africa. Cambridge University Press,

Cambridge, UK.

Cunningham, A.B. (1997), An Africa-wide overview of medicinal plant harvesting,

conservation, and health care. In: Medicinal Plants for Forest

Conservation and Health Care. Food and Agriculture Organization of

the United Nations, Rome, 116–129.

Cunningham, A.B., (1993), African medicinal plants. Setting priorities at the

interface between conservation and primary healthcare People and Plant

Initiative Working paper 1, UNESCO, Paris, France.

Cunningham, A.B., Ayuk, E., Franzel, S., Duguma, B. and Asanga, C. (2002), An

economic evaluation of medicinal tree cultivation: Prunus africana in

Cameroon. People and Plant Initiative Working paper 10. UNESCO,

Paris, France.

DCCFF, (2003), Project Proposal for the Kiwengwa-Pongwe Forest Reserve

Conservation Project. Submitted for Global Conservation Fund. August

2003. The Revolutionary Government of Zanzibar, 12pp.

Delvaux, C., Sinsin, B., Darchambeau, F. and Van Damme, P. (2009),Recovery from

bark harvesting of 12 medicinal tree species in Benin, West Africa.

Journal of Applied Ecology, 46, 703-12.

76

Eleanor Bailey, (2002), People and Traditional Medicine in Zanzibar, the reason for

their patterns of use. MES(Environment and development) Lancast

University.

Emily Roberson,(2008),Medicinal plants at risk, Nature pharmacy, our Treasure

chest, A native Plant conservation campaign report. Center for

Biological Diversity P.O. Box 710Tucson

Endashaw Bekele, (2007), Study on actual Situation of Medicinal Plants in Ethiopia,

Prepared for JAICAF (Japan Association for International

Collaboration of Agriculture and Forestry.

Ermias Lulekal, Ensermu, Kelbessa, Tamirat, Bekele and Haile Yineger (2008), An

Ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants in Mana Angetu District,

southeast Ethiopia. J. Ethnobiol and Ethnomedicine. 4 (10): licensee

Biomed.

Ernst, E ,(1998), "Harmless Herbs? A Review of the Recent Literature" (PDF). The

American Journal of Medicine 104 (2): 170–8.

Ernst, E. (2002),"A systematic review of systematic reviews of homeopathy". British

Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Garden, London.

FAO (1997), Medicinal Plants for Forest Conservation and Health Care, Global

Initiative for Traditional Systems (GIFTS) of Health, Food and

Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Non-Wood

Forest Products No. 11, Rome.

Fennel, C.W.K, L, Lindsey,L,J.L,G Sparg,G.I.Stafford,EE.Elgorash,O.M.Grace and

J.Van Staden,(2004), Assessing African Medicinal plants for efficiency

and safety: Pharmacological screening and toxicology, Journal of

ethnopharmacology.205-217.

Geldenhuys, C.J., (2004), Bark harvesting for traditional medicine: from illegal

resource degradation to participatory management. Scandinavian

Journal of Forest Research.

Ghimire, S.K., McKey, D., Aumeeruddy-Thomas, Y., (2005),Conservation of

Himalayan medicinal plants: harvesting patterns and ecology of two

threatened species, Nardostachys grandiflora DC. and Neopicrorhiza

scrophulariiflora (Pennell) Hong. Biological Conservation 124, 463–475.

Giday, M., Asfaw, Z., Elmqvist, T.,Woldu, Z (2003), An ethno-botanical study of

medicinal plants used by the Zay people in Ethiopia. Journal of

Ethnopharmacology, 85:43–52.

77

Grace N Njoroge, Isaac M Kaibui, Peter K Njenga and Peter O Odhiambo,(2010),

Utilisation of priority traditional medicinal plants and local people's

knowledge on their conservation status in arid lands of Kenya (Mwingi

District) Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and technology, 6:22

doi:10.1186/1746-4269-6-22

Grace, O.M., Prendergast, H.D.V., van Staden, J., Jager, A.K. (2002), The status of

bark in South African traditional health care. South African Journal of

Botany 68, 21–30.

Green, E.P., Mumby, P.J., Edwards, A.J., and Clark, C.D, (1996), A review of remote

sensing for the assessment and management of tropical coastal

resources. Coastal Management, 24, 1–40.

Hamburger, M., Hostettmann, K., (1991), Bioactivity in plants; the link between

phytochemistry and medicine. Phytochemistry 30 (12), 3864–3874.

Hamilton, A. C., Cunningham, A., Byarugaba, D. and Kayanja, F. (2000),

Conservation in a region of political instability. Conservation Biology,

vol. 14, pp 1722-1725.

Hamilton, A.C. (2008), “Medicinal plants in conservation and development: case

studies and lessons learnt.”, Plantlife International, Salisbury, UK.

Hamilton, A.C., (2004), Medicinal plants, conservation and livelihoods. Biodiversity

and Conservation, 13, 1477-1517.

Hamisy, W. C.D., Mwaseba, I. E. Zilihona and S. T. Mwihomeke, (2000), Status and

Domestication of Potentials of Medicinal Plants in the Uluguru

Mountains, Tanzania, Sokoine University of Agriculture. Morogoro,

Tanzania.

Harrison, K. A.; Bol, R. and Bardgett, R. D. (2007), Preferences for uptake of

different nitrogen forms by co-existing plant species and soil microbes

in temperate grasslands. Ecology 88: 989–999.

Hasan SS, Ahmed SI, Bukhari NI, Loon WC. (2009),Use of complementary and

alternative medicine among patients with chronic diseases at outpatient

clinics.

Hoffman,D, (1990), Holistic herbal, Thorsons Great Britain.

Husain, S. Z., Malik, R. N., Javaid, M. and Bibi, S.(2008), Ethonobotanical

Properties and Uses of Medicinal Plants of Morgah Biodiversity Park,

Rawalpindi, Pakistan Plant Sciences Departmen Quaid-i-Azam

University, Islamabad

Husch, B.; Beer, W. T. and Kershaw, A. J. (2002),Forest Mensuration Fourth

Edition John Wiley and Sons, London 456pp.

78

International Union Conservation Of Nature (IUCN), (2002), Medicinal Plant

Conservation Newsletter of the Medicinal Plant Specialist Group of the

IUCN Survival Commission, Vol. 8.

Is-hak B, (2013), Impact of Human activities on performance of Kibele Forest

reserve, Zanzibar, Dissertation for Award of MSc Degree University of

Dodoma.

IUCN (2012), IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, Version 2012.1,

<www.iucnredlist.org>

IUCN, (2007), Species Survival Commission Medicinal Plant Specialist Group.

“Why Conserve and Manage Medicinal Plants?” Web resource:

www.iucn.org/themes/ssc/sgs/mpsg/main/Why.html. retrieved in 2007).

IUCN. (2014), The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2014.2. Available

at: www.iucnredlist.org. (Accessed: 24 July 2014

Kaniki, H. N (2010), The Roles of Forestland Tenure Regimes in Regulating Forest

Ecosystem Goods and Services in Rombo District, Tanzania. Thesis

submitted for MSc degree in Forestry of the Sokoine University of

Agriculture.

Kanowski, J., Catterall, C.P., Wardell-Johnson, G.W.( 2005), Consequences of broad

scale timber plantations for biodiversity in cleared rainforest landscapes

of tropical and subtropical Australia. Ecology and Management 208,

359–372.

Kennedy DO, Haskell CF, Mauri PL and Scholey AB (2007), Acute cognitive

effects of standardised Ginkgo biloba extract complexed with

phosphatidylserine, Hum Psychopharmacol. 2007 Jun;22(4):199-210

Kent, M. and Coker, P. (1992), Vegetation Description and Analysis: A practical

Approach. Ann Arbor, Belhaven Press, London. 363pp.

Khamis M S, (2011), Medicinal plants for medical care and plants diversity

conservation: case study of west Usambara Mountains –Tanga.

Kombo, Y. (2010), Zanzibar Forest Biodiversity Versus Energy Crisis and Climate

Change. Zanzibar. 24pp.

Kombo, Y.H and Kitwana, M.M (1998), Coral Rag Soil Fertility Improvement,

Forestry Technical paper No. 72, Commission for Natural Resources,

Zanzibar.

Kombo, Y.H., S. I. Hamdan, M.K. Makame, K.H. Madeweya, A.U. Basha, T.A.

Said. (2002), Wood Fuel Consumption Survey for The Zanzibar Islands.

Technical Paper Number 134. Department of Commercial Crops, Fruits

and Forestry

79

Kothari,R.C, (2004), Research methodology methods and techniques 2nd Ed New

Delhi. New age international publishers.

Krebs, C. J. (1989), Ecological Methodology. Harper Collins Publishers, New York.

Krebs, Charles J. (1985), Ecology, the experimental analysis of distribution and

abundance, 3rd

edition. Harper and Row, New York.

Kuipers, S.E. (1995), Trade in medicinal plants. In Medicinal plants for

conservation and health care. Non-wood forest product 11. FAO, Roma,

Italy.

Kuipers, S.E. (1997), Trade in medicinal plants. In Medicinal plants for forest

conservation and healthcare. In Non-Wood Forest Products (eds. G.

Bordeker, K. Bhat, J. Burley, and P, Vantomme), FAO, Rome. pp 45-49.

Lamb, D., Erskine, P., Parrotta, J., (2005), Restoration of degraded tropical forest

landscapes. Science 310, 1628–1632.

Lange D, Schippmann U (1997), Trade survey of medicinal plants in Germany: a

contribution to international plant species conservation. Bundesamt für

Naturschutz, Bonn.

Larson, K. (2008), Where Humans and Spirits Meet. The Politics of Rituals and

Identified Spirits in Zanzibar. New York, Oxford: Berghahn.

Light, M.E., Sparg, S.G., Stafford, G.I. and van Staden, J. (2005), Riding the wave:

South Africa's contribution to ethnopharmacological research over the

last 25 years. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 100(1-2), 127-30.

Maganga, S. L. S (1999), Fundamentals of Ecology, Tanzania Printing Services Ltd.

Makame, N. (2013), The effect of forest degradation on forest structure and carbon

stock in kiwengwa pongwe forest reserve, Zanzibar. Dissertation for

Award of MSc Degree of Sokoine University of Agriculture

Malimbwi, R. E; Solbeg, B; and Luoga, E (1994), Estimation of biomass and volume

in Miombo woodland at Kitulangalo forest reserve. Journal of Tropical

Forest Science. Vol. 7: 230 – 242.

Mander, M., J. Mander and C. Breen (1997), Promoting the cultivation of indigenous

plants for markets Experiences from KwaZulu-Natal, Domestication and

commercialization of non-timber forest products in agroforestry systems

Rome, FAO (Non-wood Forest Products).

Marshall, N.T., (1998), Searching for a Cure: Conservation of Medicinal Wildlife

Resources in East and Southern Africa. Cambridge: TRAFFIC

International.

80

Martin, G. (1995), Ethno botany: a methods manual. Chapman and Hall, London;

pp. xx, 79, 61-65.

McMillen, H., (2012), Ethnobotanical Knowledge Transmission and Evolution: The

Case of Medicinal Markets in Tanga, Tanzania. Econ. Bot. 66, 121–131.

McMullin S. ,(2011), An assessment of the health, trade, economic and sustainability

aspects of medicinal tree and shrub products (MTSPs) in Kenya. PhD

Thesis in Rural Development. Dublin, Ireland: University College

Dublin.

Michael Wink, (2012), Medicinal plants: A source of anti-parasitic secondary

metabolites. Institute of pharmacy and Molecular Biotechnology,

Heidelberg University.

Ministry of Finance (2013), Newsletter of the Medicinal Plant Specialist Group of

the IUCN Survival Commission, Vol. 8. p.40.

Misonge J. , Wakori E, Kimondo J., Kisengi J, Waiganjo B, Mwambeo M, Gachukia

R, Muguku J, Moriasi A, Mungai G, and Nickson O,(2015), Assessment

of diversity and conservation status of plants at Mount Kenya University

Medicinal Botanical Garden, Thika sub-County, Kiambu County, Kenya,

Department of Pharmacognosy and Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy,

Mount Kenya University

Misra, K.C, (1988), Manual of plant ecology. 3rd

Ed. Oxford and IBH Publishing

Co. Pvt Ltd, New Delhi.

Monela, G. C; Chamshama, S. A. O; Mwaipopo, R, and Gamssa, D.M (2005), A

study on the Social, Economic and Environmental Impacts of Forest

Landscape Restoration in Shinyanga Region, Tanzania. IUCN Report.

Muchugi AN. (2007), Kenyatta University, Biochemistry and Biotechnology.

Population genetics and taxonomy of important medicinal tree species of

the genus Warburgia. PhD Thesis in Molecular Genetics. Nairobi,

Kenya. Kenyatta University.

Mugisha MK and Origa H O, (2005), Traditional herbal remedies used in the

management of sexual impotence and erectile dysfunction in western

Uganda.

N, Aggimarangsee, N, Sitasuwan and C, Trisonththi (2005), Diversity of Medicinal

plants Khao Lammuak in Prachuap khiri khan Province, Thailand.

National Bureau of Statistic (NBS) (2012), National population and housing census

Ng‟atigwa C, (1999), Indegenous Knowledge of Medicinal Trees and Priority for

domestication in Shinyanga, Tanzania.

81

Nibret, E., Ashour, M., Rubanza, C. D. and Wink, M. (2010), Antitrypanosomal and

Cytotoxic Activities of some Tanzanian Medicinal plants, Institute für

Pharmazie und Molekulare Biotechnologie, Universität Heidelberg, Im

Neuenheimer Feld 364, 8 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.

Nkandu, Anne Kuria, Fabrice Pinard and Fergus Sinclair,(2015), Tree species

diversity and abundance in coffee farms adjacent to areas of different

disturbance histories in Mabira forest system, central Uganda,

International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services and

Management, DOI: 10.1080/21513732.2015.1050607

Norhajar Eswani, Kamziah Abd Kudus, M. Nazre and A.G. Awang Noor (2010),

Medicinal Plant Diversity and Vegetation Analysis of Logged over Hill

Forest of Tekai Tembeling Forest Reserve, Jerantut, Pahang Faculty of

Forestry, University Putra Malaysia, 43400 Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia.

Okigbo RN, Eme UE, Ogbogu S (2008), Biodiversity and conservation of medicinal

and aromatic plants in Africa. Biotechnology. Mol. Biol. Rev. 3(6): 127-

134.

Oulu, K. (2002), Online source, <en. Wikipedia.Org/wiki/Questionnaires>

University Library, Retrieved 03/09/2010.

Owuor B.O., Kamoga D., Kungu J., and Njoroge G.N. (2006), Some Medicinal Trees

and Shrubs of Eastern Africa for Sustainable Utilization and

Commercialization. Nairobi

Penso, G. (1980), WHO inventory of medicinal plants used in different countries. –

Geneva, Switzerland, WHO.

Primack, R.B (2010), Essentials of Conservation Biology, Fifth Edition, Sinauer

Associates, Inc,. Publishers, Massachusetts USA.

RGZ, (2008), Zanzibar Traditional and Alternative Medicine policy,Ministry of

Health and Social Welfare in Collaboration with World Health

Organization, Government press Zanzibar.

Routledge P, (2009), The use of herbal medicines by people with cancer: a

qualitative study, BioMed Central Ltd, DOI: 10.1186/1472-6882-9

Samson Gwali, Hillary Agaba, Paul Balitta, David Hafashimana, Joseph,(2011),

Assessment of plants diversity and ecological status of the coastal

Tanzania forests, A case study of Mafia Island „Coastal Forest Mosaic

Schippmann, U., Leaman, D.J. and Cunningham, (2002), Impact of cultivation and

gathering of medicinal plants on biodiversity: global trends and issues.

In: Biodiversity and the Ecosystem Approach in Agriculture, Forestry

and Fisheries. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), Rome.

82

Schmincke KH (2003), Medicinal Plants for forest conservation and healthcare.

Non- Wood Forest Products 11, Food and Agriculture Organization of

the United Nations.

Shingu, G.K. (2005), Ownership and sustainable issues of botanical medicines,

Ethnobotany research and applications, 3, 17-23.

Silima, P. A. (2010), The Zanzibar National Forest Policy analysis, Final Report.

Smith, R.L. and T. M. Smith, (2001), Ecology and Field Biology, 6th

edition.

Addison Wesley Longman, San Francisco, 771 pages.

Soetan KO, (2008), Pharmacological and other beneficial effects of Ant nutritional

factors in Plants- A Review. Afr. J. Biotechnology. 7(25): 4713-4721.

Srivastava, R. (2000), Studying the information needs of medicinal plant

stakeholders in Europe. TRAFFIC Dispatches, Vol 15 ( 5). Cambridge,

UK.

Stewart, K.M., (2003), The African cherry (Prunus Africana): can lessons be learned

from an over exploited medicinal tree? Journal of Ethno pharmacology

89, 3–13.

Swai, G,Shirima, D., Makero, Emanuel, J, Yahaya. A., (2011), An assessment of

plants diversity and ecological status of the coastal Tanzania forests, A

case study of Mafia Island „Coastal Forest Mosaic, Department of

Biological Sciences (SUA),

Department of Forest Biology (SUA),

Forestry Training Institute (FTI), Forest and Beekeeping Division

Swe T, Win S. (2005), Herbal gardens and cultivation of medicinal plants in

Myanmar regional consultation on development of traditional medicine

in the South East Asia region, Department of Traditional Medicine,

Ministry of Health.

Tanya Pergola, Terrawatu, (2001), Changes in using and conserving Medicinal

Plants in Maasai, www.terrawatu.org/undp-gef_brief.htm ,(Viewed in

2003).

Terra Global Capital (TGC), (2014), HIMA (Hifadhi ya Misitu ya Asili ya jamii)

REDD+ Program, Zanzibar, Tanzania.

Ticktin, T, (2004), The ecological implications of harvesting non timber forest

products. Journal of Applied Ecology 41, 11–21.

U.S. Forest Service, (2001), Non-Timber Forest Product Fact Sheets, Web resource:

www.sfp.forprod.vt.edu/factsheets/factsheets.htm,(viewed in 2001).

UNESCO, (1996), Culture and Health, Orientation texts- World Decade for

Cultural Development Documents CLT/DEC. PRO-1996, Paris, France,

p. 29.

83

Vallance P, and Smart TG, (2006), "The future of pharmacology". British Journal of

Pharmacology, Br J Pharmacol.;147 (Suppl 1):S304–S307.

Walter, K.S. and H.J.Gillett, (1998; 1997), IUCN Red List of threatened plants.

Gland, Switzerland, IUCN.

Wang, J., ( 2006), “Platensimycin is a selective FabF inhibitor with potent antibiotic

properties.” Nature 441, 358-361.

White, B. (2002), Writing your MBA Dissertation, Continuum, London.

WHO, (1992), Quality control methods for medicinal plant materials, Geneva.

WHO, (2000), General guidelines for methodologies on research and evaluation of

traditional medicine, World Health Organization,Geveva www.iucn.org/

themes/ssc/sgs/mpsg/main/Why.html.

WHO, IUCN and WWF, (1993), Guidelines on the conservation of medicinal plants.

– Gland and Geneva, Switzerland.

WHO., (2002), Traditional medicine strategy (2002-2006), - Retrieved from WHO

website, www.who.int/medicines/library/trm/trm_strat_eng.pdf (viewed

30.9.2002)

Williams, V.L., Balkwill, K. and Witkowski, E.T.F. (2000), Unraveling the

commercial market for medicinal plants and plant parts on the

Witwatersrand, South Africa. Economic Botany, 54(3), 310-27.

Williamson, E., Okpako, D.T., Evans, F.J. (1996), Selection, Preparation and

Pharmacological Evaluation of Plant Material, Wiley, Chichester

Wilson, E. O (2006), Threats to Global Biodiversity, (http//www.global change), site

visited on 29th September, 2012.

Zanzibar Ministry of Health and Social Welfare (2008), Zanzibar Traditional and

Alternative Medicine Policy Act No. 8: The Traditional and Alternative

Medicine (Code of Ethics, Conduct and Practice) Regulations. Ministry

of Health and Social Welfare.

Zhou, S.F.,Chen, X.W.; Sneed, K.B.; Pan, S.Y.; Cao, C.; Kanwar, J.R.; Chew, H.

(2012), Herb drug interactions and mechanistic and clinical

considerations. Curr. Drug Metab. 13, 640–651.

84

APPENDICES

Appendix 1: Diversity of medicinal trees in Unguja –Central District Zanzibar

INTERVIEWS FOR TRADITIONAL HEALERS

1. Do you use or sell herbal medicine for treating your patients?

2. Which forest do you find your herbal plants?

3. How many times do you collect herbal medicine in the forest per months?

4. What parts of herbal plants do you extract most often?

5. Which method do you use for gathering herbal trees in the forest?

6. The availability of herbal trees in the forest is difficult or easy?

7. Why some herbal trees are easy and some are difficult to find?

8. Do you find any herbal trees which are so rare to find in the forest?

6a) Yes ( ) No ( ) 6b) Why they are rare to find them?

9. Name most rare or difficult herbal trees in the natural forest of your village.

10. Name the herbal trees that are easily obtained in the natural forest.

11. Which medicinal trees parts are frequently sold by Herbal sellers?

12. How does it affect you as society when certain herbal trees become lost or

unavailable?

13. Mention conservation measures that might reduce destruction of herbal trees.

14. Name common herbal trees that are capable of treating number of diseases in

the villages.

85

Appendix 2: Title: Diversity of medicinal trees in Unguja Central District

Zanzibar.

QUESTINNAIRE FOR HERBALIST AND COMMERCIAL HERBAL

TRADERS.

These questionnaires are supposed to be filled by Traditional Herbalists,

Commercial herbal traders and local peoples. Please fill the answers bellow

according to instructions after each question. Your answer is important and will be

treated confidential.

1. The village native Shehiya of………………………………………………..

2. District…………………………………………………………………………

3. Sex, Female………………………4.Male………………………………………

4. Level of your education between form 4 to 6 ( ), Bachelor ( ),

Other ( ) Put tick where appropriate

5. Do you extract, sell or use herbal Medicine? YES ( ) NO ( ).Select one,

put a tick.

6. How do you involve in the use of herbal medicine? 1. Collector and Traditional

herbalist ( ) 2.Herbal trader ( ) 3.Collector for self user ( ).

7. Which part of medicinal trees you collect or extract most often? 1.Bark and roots

( ) 2. Seeds, fruits and leaves ( ) 3.All parts ( ).

8. Where do you find your herbal plant? Local forest ( ), Forest Reserve ( )

both forest ( ).Select one put a tick.

9. Which method do you use for gathering herbal trees? 1. Uproot the tree and

extract roots ( )

2. Extract bark and leaves ( ) 3. Extract any part I need ( ) 4. All method ( )

10. How often do you collect the herbal trees in the forest? 1. Each week ( ), 2.

Each month ( ), 3. Any time when I need for self-use ( )

11. How is difficult to find the herbal trees species you need.

1. Difficult ( ), 2.Some herbal trees are so rare ( ), some herbs are easy

some are so difficult ( ).

12. Do you know herbal trees which are very rare that are better for treatment?

1. No ( ) 2. Yes ( ).

86

13) Please name the native herbal Trees which are difficult to find in village natural

forest.

1………………………………………………………………………………

2………………………………………………………………………………

3………………………………………………………………………………

4………………………………………………………………………………

5………………………………………………………………………………

14) Why some herbal medicines are becoming rare or difficult to find:

1. Over-extraction ( ) 2.harvesting for sell ( ) 3. Harvest for personal use (

) 4. Others ( )

15. Name herbal trees which are easily available in natural village forest.

1…………………………………………………………………………………

2………………………………………………………………………………

3………………………………………………………………………………

16. Which medicinal trees parts are frequently sold by Herbal sellers?

1. Roots ( ) 2.Barks and leaves ( ) 3.Fruits, Seeds and Flowers ( )

17 What can we do for herbal medicines that are becoming rare in our village forest?

1. Conservation ( ) 2.Education ( ) 3. Formulate laws 4.Replanting herbal

trees ( )

18) Which problem that may happen when certain herbal plant become lost or rare in

our village forest?

1. Economic ( ) 2. Ecological ( ) 3 Health ( )

18. Name herbal trees that are common for treating more than one disease in the

natural forest (herbal medicine that are better than other known to treat several

diseases in the village).

87

Appendix 3: Diversity of medicinal trees in Unguja Central District-Zanzibar

Questions in the form of ranking medicinal trees bellow are supposed to be filed by

Traditional healers, herbal traders and local peoples.

District…………………………..Native Shehia of……………………

1. The following bellow are some common medicinal trees that are seen to become

rare or difficult to find them in the village forests. Use tick (√) in the table bellow

to show level of difficult or rarity in corresponding with the medicinal tree.

Medicinal trees

species

Show level of rarity or difficult of the medicinal trees

than other by putting tick ( √) corresponding to the

specific medicinal trees bellow.

Degree of rarity scores

1. Drypetes

natalensis

2. Pittosporum

viridiflorum

3. Croton

sylvaticus

4.Veinonia

zanzibarensis

5.Monanthotaxi

s fornicata

6.Teclea

simplicifolia

7. Caesalpinia

bonducella

8.Clausena

anisata

9Turraea

floribunda

88

The following bellow are some common and easily available medicinal trees that are

found in the village forests. Use tick (√) in the table bellow to show level of

availability and presence in corresponding with the medicinal tree.

Medicinal

trees species

Show level of availability or presence of the medicinal

trees than other by putting tick ( √ )

Degree of availability scores

1.Euclea

racemosa

2. Polysphaeria

parvifolia

3.Flueggea

virosa

4.Eugenia spp.

5.Mollotus

oppositifolius

6. Sorindeia

madagascarien

sis)

7. Suregada

zanzibariensis

8.Machersonia

gracilis

9.Mtamagoa

10.Flacourtia

indica

11.Ozorora

obovata

89

3. The following bellow are some common medicinal trees that are frequently used

by Traditional healers, herbal sellers and community village. Use tick (√) in the

table bellow to show level of priority in corresponding with the medicinal tree.

Medicinal trees

species

Show level of Priority of the medicinal trees for

treatment than the other by putting tick ( √ )

Degree of priority scores

1. Drypetes

natalensis

2. Suregada

zanzibariensis

3. Pittosporum

viridiflorum

4.Crotonsylvati

cus

5. Teclea

simplicifolia

6. Vernonia

zanzibarensis

7. Toddalia

asiatica

8.Mononthotoxi

s fornicate

9.Turraea

floribunda

10.Cussonia

zimmerimanii

11. Croton

pseudochellus

12.Annona

senegalensis

90

Appendix 4: Medicinal Trees Data Collection In Villages Forests.

Shehiya of ……………………………………………………….

Date……………………………………………………….............................................

District………………………………………………………………………………

No of

Plots

Local name of

Herbal trees

(Jina la miti ya

dawa za asili)

Tally No.

Frequency

GPS

X………………

Y………………

Everage

Height

91

Appendix 5: Medicinal trees foud in sample plots.

Botanical name Local

name

Parts used Diseases treated

Euclea natalensis Msiliza Roots Constipation

Polysphaeria

porvifolia

Mlapaa Roots Stomach aches

Flueggea virosa Mkwamba Leaves /

roots

Cure chest pain

Promote fertility in women

Eugnea uniflora Mkaaga Roots /

leaves

Influenza, cough and skin

diseases.

Mollotus

opporsitifolia

Mtumbika Roots /

leaves

Keep pregnancy in good

condition.

Treat children fever

Soriendeia

madagascariensis

Mpilipili

doria

Roots / bark Treat T.B, worms,

Menstruation in women.

Macphersonia

gracilis

Mjoma Roots Treat erectile dysfunction

Suregada

zanzibarensis

Mdimsitu Leaves, roots Mosquito repellent,

Pressure, fever, abdominal

pain.

Annona

senegalensis

Mtopetope Fruits, bark,

leaves

Stomach aches, dysentery,

worms, pneumonia, cold.

Mimusops

obtusifolia

Mnyovuo Bark Wounds, sores

Sterculia

Africana

Muoza Bark , leaves Mental disorder, snake bite,

fever, influenza

Rapanea

melanophloes

Mkangara

shamba

Bark , leaves Spiritual remedy,

strengthen the heart.

Rhus longipes Mchengele Roots Malaria, fever.

Rhus natalensis Mkumba Roots Fitness for children,

wounds, dysentery, and

stomach aches.

Myternus Mnusi Leaves, roots Mixture with other herbs

92

Botanical name Local

name

Parts used Diseases treated

mossambicensis treat ulcer,

Spiritual remedy

Fiscus spp. Mkuyu Leaves, bark Treat pain and skin diseases

Sideroxylon

inerme

Mkandika Cure broken born, fever,

spirits remedy.

Dodonea viscosa Mkeneta

dume

Bark, roots Digestive system disorder,

rheumatism

Bersama

abyssinica

Muangakau Bark, leaves,

roots

Worms, snake bites,

headaches, diarrhea.

Dichrostraschys

cinerea

Mgunga Leaves, roots Snake bites, wound, and

stomach aches.

Psidium

punctuate

Mkeneta

jike

Leaves Rashes

Trema orientalis Mpesu Leaves , bark Cough, asthma

Euphorbia nyikae Mkweche Bark, leave Mixture with other herbs

treats skin diseases and pest

crops. Paralysis

Senna pertesiana Mpingaume Constipation, stomach

aches

Turraea

floribunda

Mtamagoa Bark, leaves,

fruits

Throat, wounds, impotence

and absence

Croton

psudochellus

Mgeuka Roots, bark,

leaves

Cold, fever, asthma,

headaches and spiritual

remedy

Clausena anisata Muavikali Leaves and

Roots

Fever and cough

Control convulsion during

pregnancy.

Treat blood pressure and

worms.

Carpodiptera

Africana

Muanga Bark, root Treat eyes conditions

aphrodisiacs

93

Botanical name Local

name

Parts used Diseases treated

Cussonia

zimmerimanii

Mpapai

mwitu

Roots, leaves Mental illness, bleeding for

children, fever, malaria,

gonorrhea.

Hoslundia

opposite

Mlashore Leaves Fever

Ozorora obovata Mgombe Roots Stomach ache and fever

Terminalia

boivinii

Mkunguni Bark Wound, sexual dysfunction

Caesalpinia

bonducella

Mkomwe Leaves,

roots, seeds

and bark

Malaria, stomach ache,

rheumatisms, trachoma,

anti-asthma.

Mystroxylon

aethiopicum

Kifugu Fruits, bark,

roots

Prevent miscarriage,

urinary infection, treatment

of multiples of stomach

condition. Anaemia

Flacourtia indica Mgo Fruits, bark,

roots

Spiritual diseases,

appetizing, digestive

discomfort, fever.

Euphobia tirukali Mtofua

macho

Roots, Seed Snake bite, Intestinal

parasites, aching bones.

Strychnos spinosa Mtongo Bark, fruits,

Roots

Impotence, Pregnancy

condition, fever, snake bite.

Bridelia

micrantha

Mkaati Bark, roots Stomach aches, aching

joints,

coughs

Strychnos innocua Mtonga Roots, bark,

fruits

Gonorrhea, snake bite,

facilitates child birth and

dysentery.

Monodora

grandidieri

Mchofu

dume

Seeds ,leaves Headaches and fever.

Toddalia asiatica Mnywa Roots ,bark Fever, cough, pregnancy

94

Botanical name Local

name

Parts used Diseases treated

conditions and pain killer.

Albizia

adianthifolia

Mkenge Roots, bark Cure skin diseases, snake

bites, bronchitis and spirits.

Rawsonia lucida Mpera

mwitu

Roots, leaves Flue, cough, head aches

Ludia mauritiana Mchanga

changa

Roots, leaves Children fever, pregnancy

conditions

Source:Field data, 2015


Recommended