Date post: | 24-Jan-2023 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | khangminh22 |
View: | 0 times |
Download: | 0 times |
0
EXAMINATION OF THE IMPACT OF BRANDING ON THE SALES
PERFORMANCE OF SOFT DRINK PRODUCTS IN TANZANIA:
THE CASE OF SEVEN UP BOTTLING COMPAN
0
EXAMINATION OF THE IMPACT OF BRANDING ON THE SALES
PERFORMANCE OF SOFT DRINK PRODUCTS IN TANZANIA:
THE CASE OF SEVEN UP BOTTLING COMPANY
By
Celestina Flavian Bwana
A Dissertation Submitted to the School of Business in Partial/Fulfillment of the
Requirements for the Award of
Master of Science in Marketing of Mzumbe University;
2020
i
CERTIFICATION
We, the undersigned, certify that we have read and hereby recommend for
acceptance by the Mzumbe University a dissertation entitled, Eexamination of the
impact of branding on the sales performance of soft drink products in Tanzania: the
case of seven up bottling company, in Partial/Fulfilment of the Requirements for
Award of the Master’s Degree of Science in Marketing of Mzumbe University.
___________________________
Major Supervisor
___________________________
Internal Examiner
___________________________
External Examiner
Accepted for the Board of Mzumbe University Dar es Salaam Campus College
_________________________________________________________
PRINCIPAL, DAR ES SALAAM CAMPUS COLLEGE BOARD
ii
DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT
I, Celestina Flavian Bwana, declare that this dissertation is my own original work
that all reference sources have been accurately acknowledged and reported, and that
it has not been presented and will not be presented in any other university for similar
or any other to obtain an academic qualification.
Signature: _________________
Date: ____________________
© 2020
This dissertation is a copyright material protected under the Berne Convention, the
Copyright Act 1999 and other international and national enactments, in that behalf,
on intellectual property. It may not be reproduced by any means in full or in part,
except for short extracts in fair dealings, for research or private study, critical
scholarly review or discourse with an acknowledge, without the written permission
of Mzumbe University, on behalf of the author.
iii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I thank all who in one way or another contributed in the completion of this research.
First, I give thanks to God for protection and ability to do my work. I give deep
thanks to Dr. Hawa Petro Tundui who was the major supervisor of this research for
her untiring leadership and guidance. I am also deeply thankful to my informants.
Their names cannot be disclosed, but I want to acknowledge and appreciate their
help and transparency during my research. Their information has helped me
complete this thesis.
I am also so thankful to my fellow students whose challenges and productive critics
have provided new ideas to the work. Last but not least, I can’t be thankful enough
to my beloved family who encouraged me and prayed for me throughout the time of
my research.
May the Almighty God richly bless all of you.
iv
DEDICATION
I would like to dedicate this work to my late parents Mr. and Mrs. Flavian Bwana, to
my siblings and to all my nieces and nephews, May God bless them all.
v
ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
AMA American Marketing Association
SBC Seven Up Bottling Company
7UP Seven Up
TCC The Coca Cola Company
vi
ABSTRACT
This study aimed to examine the impact of branding on the sales performance of soft
drink products in Tanzania. A case study approach was used and Seven Up Bottling
Company in Dar es Salaam was selected as a case study specifically, aiming at
identifying the factors influencing branding soft drink products, assessing the brand
strengths of soft drinks manufactured by Seven Up Bottling Company, identifying
the influence of brand awareness on the sales performance of soft drink products and
identifying the influence of brand association on the sales performance of soft drink
products at Seven Up Bottling Company. A target population was 400 individuals
comprising 18 employees in the sales and marketing department of the organization
and 382 corporate customers of the company. Systematic sampling method was used
to select a sample of 200 individuals comprising sales and marketing staff and
customers of the company.The research data were collected by distributing a closed
ended questionnaire. The obtained data were analyzed quantitatively with the aid of
descriptive statistics, correlation and regression analysis. The study found that the
factors influencing branding of soft drink by the company included ensuring
recognition of the soft drinks in the market place. Also, it was found that the strength
of 7UP was generally negative in terms of respect of brand and thinking about the
brand by customers while that of Mirinda and Pespi were generally positive.
Correlation analysis showed that both brand awareness and brand association have
positive correlation with the sales performance of soft drink products. Also,
regression analysis showed that both brand awareness and brand associated have
strong positive and statistically significant relationship with the sales performance of
soft drinks. This implied both, brand awareness and brand association have positive
influence on the sales performance of soft drink products. The recommendations of
the study is that branding should be considered as the candid marketing strategy in
influencing the sales performance of soft drink products of the company and should
be used to increase and maintain the sales performance of the soft drinks products of
the company.
vii
TABLE OF CONTENT
CERTIFICATION ........................................................................................................... i
DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT .........................................................................ii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .......................................................................................... iii
DEDICATION ................................................................................................................ iv
ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ....................................................................... v
ABSTRACT .................................................................................................................... vi
LIST OF TABLES ......................................................................................................... xi
LIST OF FIGURES ......................................................................................................xii
CHAPTER ONE ............................................................................................................. 1
PROBLEM SETTING .................................................................................................... 1
1.1. Introduction ................................................................................................................ 1
1.2. Background to the problem ........................................................................................ 1
1.3. Statement of the problem ........................................................................................... 4
1.4. Research objectives .................................................................................................... 5
1.4.1. General objective .................................................................................................... 5
1.4.2. Specific objectives .................................................................................................. 5
1.5. Research questions ..................................................................................................... 5
1.6. The significance of the study ..................................................................................... 5
1.6.1. To the management of SBC .................................................................................... 6
1.6.2. To academicians ...................................................................................................... 6
1.6.3. To existing stock of knowledge .............................................................................. 6
1.7. Limitations of the study ............................................................................................. 6
1.8. Delimitations of the study .......................................................................................... 7
1.9. Structure of the dissertation ....................................................................................... 9
CHAPTER TWO .......................................................................................................... 11
LITERATURE REVIEW ............................................................................................. 11
2.1. Introduction .............................................................................................................. 11
2.2. Theoretical literature ................................................................................................ 11
2.2.1. Definitions of Concepts......................................................................................... 11
viii
2.2.1.1. Product ............................................................................................................... 11
2.2.1.2. Branding ............................................................................................................. 13
2.2.1.3. Brand strength .................................................................................................... 14
2.2.1.4. Brand awareness................................................................................................. 15
2.2.1.5. Brand association ............................................................................................... 15
2.2.1.6. Sales performance .............................................................................................. 16
2.2.2. Review of related theory ....................................................................................... 17
2.2.3. Factors influencing branding ................................................................................ 20
2.2.4. Brand strength ....................................................................................................... 21
2.2.5. Influence of brand awareness on the sales performance ....................................... 21
2.2.6. Influence of brand association on the sales performance...................................... 21
2.3. Empirical literature................................................................................................... 22
2.4. Research gap ............................................................................................................ 26
2.5. Conceptual framework ............................................................................................. 27
Table 2.1: Explanation of the conceptual framework ..................................................... 29
CHAPTER THREE ...................................................................................................... 26
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY ................................................................................ 26
3.1. Introduction .............................................................................................................. 26
3.2. Area of the study ...................................................................................................... 26
3.3. Research design ........................................................................................................ 27
3.4. Target population ..................................................................................................... 27
3.5. Sampling techniques and sample size ...................................................................... 28
3.5.1. Sampling techniques ............................................................................................. 28
3.5.2. Sample size............................................................................................................ 29
3.6. Data collection method ............................................................................................ 30
3.7. Data analysis ............................................................................................................ 31
3.7.1. Assumptions of linear regression equation ........................................................... 34
3.8. Validity and reliability ............................................................................................. 34
3.8.1. Validity .................................................................................................................. 34
3.8.2. Reliability .............................................................................................................. 35
ix
3.9. Ethical considerations .............................................................................................. 36
CHAPTER FOUR ......................................................................................................... 38
PRESENTATION OF THE FINDINGS ..................................................................... 38
4.1. Introduction .............................................................................................................. 38
4.2. Factors influencing branding soft drink products at SBC ........................................ 38
4.3. Brand strength of soft drinks manufactured by SBC ............................................... 39
Table 4.2: Brand strengths of soft drinks manufactured by SBC ................................... 40
4.4. Influence of brand awareness on the sales performance of soft drink products ..... 40
4.5. Influence of brand association on the sales performance of soft drink products .... 41
4.4: Influence of brand association on the sales performance of soft drink products .... 42
4.6. The influence of brand awareness and brand association on the sales ................ 43
4.6.1. Correlation analysis ............................................................................................... 43
4.6.2. Regression analysis ............................................................................................... 44
CHAPTER FIVE ........................................................................................................... 47
DISCUSSION OF THE FINDINGS ............................................................................ 47
5.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 47
5.2 Factors influencing branding soft drink products at SBC ......................................... 47
5.3 Brand strength of soft drinks manufactured by SBC ................................................ 48
5.4 Influence of brand awareness on the sales performance of soft drink products ...... 49
5.5 Influence of brand association on the sales performance of soft drink product ........ 50
CHAPTER SIX ............................................................................................................. 53
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS ................................. 53
6.1. Introduction .............................................................................................................. 53
6.2. Summary .................................................................................................................. 53
6.3. Conclusion ............................................................................................................... 56
6.3.1Factors influencing branding soft drink products at Seven Up Bottling Company 56
6.3.2 Brand strengths of soft drinks manufactured by Seven Up Bottling Company ..... 56
6.3.2 Influence of brand awareness and brand association on the sales performa .......... 57
x
6.4. Recommendations .................................................................................................... 57
6.5. Implications of the study .......................................................................................... 58
6.6. Recommendations for further researches ................................................................. 58
REFERENCES ................................................................................................................ 60
APPENDIX I: QUESTIONNAIRE ................................................................................ 63
xi
LIST OF TABLES
Table 3. 1: Interpretation of the rating scale .............................................................. 32
Table 3. 2: Translations of the responses into binary data ......................................... 33
Table 4. 1: Factors influencing branding soft drink product at SBC ......................... 39
Table 4. 2: Brand strengths of soft drinks manufactured by SBC ............................. 40
Table 4. 3: Brand awareness and the sales performance of soft drink products ....... 41
Table 4 4: Influence of brand association on the sales performance of soft drink .... 42
Table 4. 5: Correlation coefficients of the brand awareness, brand association ....... 44
Table 4. 6: Correlation coefficients of brand awareness and brand association ....... 45
xii
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 2. 1 : The products of Seven Up Bottling Company....................................... 12
Figure 2. 2: Conceptual framework on the impact of branding on the sales performance of soft drink products ............................................................................ 28
1
CHAPTER ONE
PROBLEM SETTING
1.1. Introduction
Branding is increasingly gaining the great deal in marketing strategies among
modern companies and it is generally connected with the sales of the branded
products. This study therefore, seeks to examine the impact of branding on the sales
performance of soft drink products in Tanzania. In this chapter one of this study
covers the background, statement, objectives and research questions. Besides, this
chapter gives the significance, limitations and delimitations of the study and
organization of this dissertation.
1.2. Background to the problem
Branding is a well known marketing strategies implemented by business companies
all over the world. Ideally, no product can exist in the market place without being
branded. Branding is manifested by the presence of names, terms, signs, symbols,
designs or combinations of both in identifying and differentiating the product from
others in the markets (Kumar, Poornima, Abraham, and Jayashree, 2006; American
Marketing Association [AMA] quote by Kotler and Keller, 2012; Hagee, 2017).
Branding is important as the product itself,without it a particualr product may not be
differentiated easily from the competing brands in the markets where products are
offered.
Branding offers the customers with important information and knowledge about the
products and hence it is increasingly used by companies and marketers to raise
customer awareness about the products and to influence purchase decisions of the
product (Singh, 2013; Sarwar, Aftab, Iqbal, 2016; Akkucuk and Esmaeili, 2016;
Kyei, 2016; Alamgir, Nasir, and Shamsuddoha, 2014; Sabharwal, Pratap and Lamba,
2016).
2
Also, branding is used as the powerful tool of increasing customer attention to the
brand and reducing recognition of certain competing brands (Sabharwal et al., 2016).
The information stored by individual about the brands is very crucial making
decisions for buying the product (Sabharwal et al., 2016).
Branding the products allows consumers to quickly recognize a product as one they
are familiar with or one, they like. Also, it acts as a memory cue, allowing consumers
to retrieve relevant information from memory which may be about past experience of
the brand, brand perceptions or brand associations (Sabharwal et al., 2016). To some
reserachers, experience about the brand, brand perception and brand associations
significantly affect the sales performance of the products (Alamgir et al., 2014;
Sarwar et al., 2016; Kyei, 2016).
Tanzania in particular, branding has remained a significant factor used for the
purpose of influencing sales of the products. With an increasing number of business
companies, branding is dominating marketing strategies among companies so as to
identify and to differentiate products of one company from those of competitors and
hence high sales of the product in the competitive markets. As the common practices,
local companies in Tanzania use different names, terms, signs, symbols, designs or
combinations of all of them to brand their products (Kikwilu et al .2008).
Branding tends to create recognition of the products, differentiation and also
inculcating useful information and experience about the products thereby
contributing largely on the sales of the products (Kikwilu, Mulder and Frencken,
2008). That is why some new products competing with strong branded products and
highly customer experienced brands have been characterized with low sales and
subsequent disappearance from market. Talking about such products, one would not
forget Aha and Rungu Toothpastes emerged to compete against White dent a decade
ago which have already disappeared from market places (Kikwilu et al., 2008). This
phenomenon supports view by Sabharwal et al. (2016) that branding is being used as
the powerful tool in influencing sales of the product by increasing customer attention
to brand whilst reducing recognition of certain competing brands.
3
The soft drinks like other products are normally branded by manufacturing
companies in Tanzania for enhancing identity and difference. Each new soft drink
entering the market is assigned with its own and unique name, term, sign, symbol,
design or some combinations of them. The Seven Up Bottling Company (T) Ltd for
example which is among the successfully soft drink bottling companies in Tanzania
is used to produce varieties of soft drinks since its establishment in 2001 (Seven Up
Company [SBC], 2019).
All soft drinks manufactured by the SBC are identified and differentiated from other
soft drink products of the same company and competing soft drink products
manufactured by other company mainly through branding. Branding the SBC soft
drinks products uses the varieties of names, terms, signs, symbols, designs or their
combinations giving into the rise of four major brand of the soft drinks of the
products of the company namely; Pepsi, Mountain Dew, Mirinda and 7UP (SBC,
2019).
Among the soft drinks manufactured by the SBC above, the most recently adopted
brand is Mountain Dew and the oldest being 7UP (SBC, 2019). The sales
performance of the 7UP has remained relatively very low compared to the sale level
of the rest brands of the company (Pepsi, Mountain Dew and Mirinda)1 despite that
the 7UP is the earliest product branding the company ‘Seven Up Company’.
For understanding the influence of branding on the sale performance of the soft drink
products and to contribute in enhancing the sales performance of different soft drinks
of the products of the company in different markets, the researcher was motivated to
examine the impact of branding on the sales performance of the soft drinks in
Tanzania drawing experience from Seven Up Bottling Company.
1Accessed from company’s website: http:/www.sbctanzania.com= sales+performance+data+of+sbc+brands on Friday 19th July, 2019
4
1.3. Statement of the problem
Branding has remained one of the fundamental marketing strategies that enable
marketers and companies to influence the sales performance of their products. This
has been established by several researchers including Sabharwal et al. (2016)
demonstrating that branding influences the sales performance of the products by
increasing customer attention to brand and reducing recognition of certain competing
brands. Branding stores useful information about the products in the memory of the
consumers which allows consumers to quickly recognize a product as one they are
familiar or aware with or one, they like basing on the past experience of the brand,
brand perceptions or brand associations (Sabharwal et al., 2016). Customer
information, awareness and experience about products are very crucial for the sales
performance of any product (Alamgir et al., 2014; Sarwar et al., 2016; Kyei, 2016).
However, several researchers report conflicting results on the influence of brand
awareness and brand association on the sales performance of the product. For
instance, Akkucuk and Esmaeili (2016) reported that buying the Smartphone was
influenced by brand awareness. On the contrary, Akkucuk and Esmaeili found that
brand association did not have influence on the purchase behavior of smart phone
buyers. Kyei (2016) found that both brand awareness and brand associations had
positive and significant impact on the sales of the products (Kyei, 2016). Alamgir et
al. (2014) aligned with Kyei stating that when consumers went to purchase cars, they
preferred to purchase the well known and branded cars.
Having encountered with the above contradictions, the researcher developed the
interest to assess the impact of branding on the sales performance of the soft drink
products in Tanzania drawing experience from SBC.
5
1.4. Research objectives
1.4.1. General objective
The general objective of this study was to examine the impact of branding on the
sales performance of soft drink products in Tanzania.
1.4.2. Specific objectives
The study was guided by the following specific objectives:
i. To identify the factors influencing branding soft drink products at Seven Up
Bottling Company.
ii. To assess the brand strengths of soft drinks manufactured by Seven Up Bottling
Company.
iii. To identify the influence of brand awareness on the sales performance of soft
drink products at Seven Up Bottling Company.
iv. To identify the influence of brand association on the sales performance of soft
drink products at Seven Up Bottling Company.
1.5. Research questions
The study was guided by the following research questions:
i. What are the factors for branding soft drink products at Seven Up Bottling
Company?
ii. What are the brand strengths of soft drinks manufactured by Seven Up Bottling
Company?
iii. What is the influence of brand awareness on the sales performance of soft drink
products at Seven Up Bottling Company?
iv. What is the influence of brand association on the sales performance of soft drink
products at Seven Up Bottling Company?
1.6. The significance of the study
Undertaking and completion of this study will be helpful to different authorities and
and individuals specifically, the management of company under the study,
academicians and in the existing stock of knowledge.
6
1.6.1. To the management of SBC
This study would help the company in reviewing branding strategy that will boost
the sales performance of 7UP which has remained relatively low compared with the
sales achieved by sister brands such as Pepsi, Mirinda and Mountain Dew. This
significance is enhanced by the research finding results on the assessment of brand
strengths of soft drinks manufactured by Seven Up Bottling Company which is the
second objective of this study.
1.6.2. To academicians
This study is resolving the conflicting ideas on the impact branding on the purchase
of the products. Prior to this study, Akkucuk and Esmaeili (2016) claimed that brand
association has no influence on the sales. Kyei (2016) on the other hand found that
brand association has positive and statistically significant influence of the sales
performance of the products. With the aid of correlation and regression analyses, this
study tested influence of brand association on the sales performance of soft drink
products and the proof has been established.
1.6.3. To existing stock of knowledge
Prior to this study, there was evidence that every studies existed pertaining to the
impact of branding on the sales performance of the products in Tanzania. Therefore
this study is contributing useful knowledge in this research area specifically by
informing the factors influencing branding soft drink products at Seven Up Bottling
Company, brand strength of soft drink products manufactured by Seven Up Bottling
Company, the influence of brand awareness on the sales performance of soft drink
products at Seven Up Bottling Company and the influence of brand association on
the sales performance of soft drink products at Seven Up Bottling Company.
1.7. Limitations of the study
One of the limitations of this study is related with the research design adopted. The
researcher adopted a case study design whereby examination of the impact of
branding on the sales of the product was based in single organization that is SBC in
7
Dar es Salaam. As the result, the finding results are not capable of making
generalization other Tanzanian companies; instead they are specific to the SBC Dar
es Salaam.
The other limitation is related with sample selection. In order to select the samples,
the researcher targeted a population of 400 individuals comprising 18 employees in
the sales and marketing department of the company and 382 corporate customers.
A systematic sampling technique was used to construct a sample of 200 individuals
comprising 9 employees and 191 corporate customers of the company. In the end,
only 159 respondents out of the total completed their questionnaires equals to 79.5%
response rate. The remaining 41 respondents (30.5%) did not complete the
questionnaire. Therefore, the data analysis did not use 100% response rate which
could influence the results otherwise.
1.8. Delimitations of the study
The study concentrated on the examination of the impact of branding on the sales
performance of soft drink products at Seven Up Bottling Company. Among five
branches where SCB operates in Tanzania, namely; Dar es Salaam, Morogoro,
Mwanza, Arusha and Mbeya, the study was conducted at SBC in Dar es Salaam.
The study aimed at achieving four main objectives only namely; 1) to identify the
factors influencing branding soft drink products at Seven Up Bottling Company, 2)
to assess the brand strengths of soft drinks manufactured by Seven Up Bottling
Company, 3) to identify the influence of brand awareness on the sales performance
of soft drink products at Seven Up Bottling Company and 4) to identify the influence
of brand association on the sales performance of soft drink products at Seven Up
Bottling Company.
The data required to achieve the objectives above were collected by distributing the
closed ended questionnaire to 200 individuals comprised 9 (4.5%) employees of the
8
company who worked in the marketing and sales department and 191 (95.5%)
corporate customers of the company.
The questionnaire was the only method of data collection method in this study and
was constructed by the Likert type scale with five levels, that is; extremely agree [5],
agree [4], neither [3], disagree [2] and extremely disagree [1]. The questions were
developed based on the researcher’s understanding of relevant concepts, variables
and ideas of the consulted literature ad empirical researches. This Likert type
questionnaire was preferred so as to quantify opinions, knowledge and experience of
individuals on the impact of branding on the sales performance of the soft drink
products of the company.
There were a total of six sections in the questionnaire. The first section contained
questions which were guided the study to obtain data on the demographic
information of the respondents. The questions in this section were based on the ages,
sex, education levels and years which respondents had been the customers/employees
of the company.
The second subsection contained items/questions which guided the study to collect
data on the factors influencing branding soft drink products at SBC. The third
subsection contained items/questions which guided the study to obtain data on brand
strength of soft drink products manufactured by SBC.
The fourth subsection contained items/questions which guided the study to collect
data on the influence of brand awareness on the sales performance of soft drink
products at SBC. The fifth subsection contained items/questions which guided the
study to collect data on the influence of brand association on the sales performance
of soft drink products at SBC. Section six contained items/questions which guided
the study to collect data on the sales performance of soft drink products of the
company.
9
The obtained data was analyzed quantitatively with the aid of descriptive statistics
only the presentation used table of number and mean values. The relationship
between brand awareness and brand association with the sales performance of soft
drinks products of the company was identified by performing the correlation and
regression analyses.
1.9. Structure of the dissertation
This dissertation is structured into six chapters. The first chapter is about the problem
setting which is elaborated covering nine subsections namely, introduction,
background to the problem, statement of the problem, research questions, research
objectives, significance of the study, limitations of the study, delimitation of the
study and structure of the study.
The second chapter is about literature review which involved extensive review of
related literature. The concepts extracted from literature are presented into two
subheadings namely; theoretical literature (concept definitions and review of related
theories) and empirical literature (similar researches, methodology used and major
findings and conclusions made). There are also three major subheadings about
introduction to the chapter, research gap and conceptual framework making five
subheadings of the chapter in total.
The third chapter is about research methodology which comprises subheadings
like research design, area of the study, target population, sampling techniques and
sample size, data collection methods, data analysis, validity and reliability of
research instrument and ethical consideration.
Chapter four is about presentations of the findings based on the data collected on the
demographic information of the respondents and the first, second, third and fourth
objectives of the study. The first subsection of this chapter is about introduction. The
second subsection makes presentation of the research finding results on the first
objective about the factors influencing branding soft drink products at SBC. The
third subsection makes presentation of finding results on the second objective about
10
brand strengths of soft drinks manufactured by SBC.The fourth subsection makes
presentation of finding results on the third objective about influence of brand
awareness on the sales performance of soft drink products at SBC. The fifth
subsection makes presentation of finding results on the fourth objective about the
influence of brand association on the sales performance of soft drink products at
SBC. The last subsection tests the relationship between brand awareness and brand
association on the sales performance of soft drink products at SBC.
Chapter five, gives a thorough discussion of the research findings which was
obtained under the guidance of the research objectives by using the research question
as the tool to obtain relevant data relating to the research objectives
Chapter six provides summary, conclusions and recommendations of the research
findings. Also, it provides policy implication of the study and the recommendations
for the coming researches.
11
CHAPTER TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1. Introduction
In this chapter, the researcher reviews scholarly articles/journals, books, papers,
publications and some academic reports. The review of these sources aims to
enhance acquisition of useful information, generation of knowledge and
understanding about the key concepts, variables and ideas about branding, brand
strengths, brand awareness, brand association and sales performance of the products
as the result of branding.
The above concepts, variables and ideas are presented into two major subheadings
namely the theoretical literature and empirical literature. The theoretical literature
comprises the definitions of key concepts, variables and attitude theory which is used
to guide this study. Besides to that, this subsection explains the factors influencing
branding and offers insight elaboration on the brand strength, brand awareness, brand
association and sales performance.
The empirical literature covers the earlier researches on the similar problem of the
study to inform the methodologies which were used, major findings and conclusions.
The purpose of empirical literature is to assist in identifying research gap that will be
given attention by the current study. This chapter concluded with the conceptual
framework that demonstrates tentative relationship among key variables of the study.
2.2. Theoretical literature
2.2.1. Definitions of Concepts
2.2.1.1. Product
A product generally means the article or substance manufactured or refined by
individuals or companies for sale (Gupta, 2005). Alamgir et al. (2014) define the
12
product as something made in the factory. According to these definitions,
manufacturing is a key process which brings the product into existence and hence, a
product should be distinguished from services which are created through non-
manufacturing processes.
The products have physical characteristics such as tangibility which distinguishes
them from services (Kotler and Keller, 2012). Such physical characteristics of the
products can be copied by the competitors giving into the rise of the competing
products with close similarities in terms of physical features (Alamgir et al. 2014).
Basing on the Seven Up Bottling Company (SBC), the products include all soft
drinks products manufactured by the company for sale in different markets.
According to the company’s annual sales report for the year 2019, there are four
major soft drink products which the company manufacturer for sales namely; Pepsi,
Mountain Dew, Mirinda and 7UP (SBC, 2019). These soft drinks products appear as
shown by Fig.2.1.
Figure 2. 1 : The products of Seven Up Bottling Company
Source: Seven Up Bottling Company Profile, 2019
The first from the left is the Mountain Dew soft drink of the company which entered
into Tanzanian soft drink market in 2009 and its popularity was anchored by
marketing slogan that ‘it does not matter what you do, but how you Dew’ (SBC,
2019).
13
The second is 7UP soft drink of the company which dates back to 1992 in Tanzania
market and is the SBC first soft drink circulated countrywide. Its popularity rose out
of being promoted as a healthier and better alternative to other soft drinks which
were presented in the local market in that time (SBC, 2019).
The third is Pepsi soft drink which is the most famous product of the company which
was innovated in the Unites Stated of America (U.S.A) in 1886 and went into
renovations that have brought it in Tanzanian soft market where it is registering
highest sales performance among soft drink of the company (SBC, 2019).
The fourth is Mirinda soft drink of the company which gained recognition in 2008
when it was revived and supplied in Tanzanian soft drink market in large quantities
in the booming market (SBC, 2019).
2.2.1.2. Branding
The term brand which forms the root of branding simply means whatever assigned
(whether name, sign or label) to the product by the manufacturer so as to distinguish
particular product from other products of the same or different manufacturers
(Kumar et al., 2006). According to Alamgir et al. (2014), a brand is something that is
bought by a customer. As opposed to the product, a brand cannot be copied by the
competitor instead it is unique for the particular product and manufacturing company
(Alamgir et al., 2014).
Branding is defined as a name, term, sign, symbol, or design or a combination of
them, intended to identify the goods or services of one seller or group of sellers and
to differentiate them from those of competitors (AMA in Kotler and Keller, 2012).
From SBC perspective, branding implies assigning different names, signs and
symbols on the different soft drink products of the company.
Branding has remained a standalone strategy that creates recognition and
distinguishes one product of SBC from all others soft drinks in the markets. Hagee
14
(2017) stresses that branding tries to affect the minds of customers as they interact
with the brand owner and brand it. In so doing, branding influences positively the
sales performance of the product by influences the sales of the products by increasing
customer attention to brand and reducing recognition of certain competing brands
(Sabharwal et al., 2016).
2.2.1.3. Brand strength
Brand strength refers to the value carrying the brand evaluated basing on the
perceptions of customers about the brand over a period of time (Bhasin, 2019). The
brand may have positive or negative strength and the positive brand strength is
manifested by high respect for brand among customer, positive thinking about the
quality and price of the brand while negative brand strength normally lacks respect
among customers as they think negative about the quality and price of the brand
ultimately the sales performance of the brand fall below the expectations (Bhasin,
2019).
Brand strength can be built build, managed and protected (Fetscherin, 2010) and
improving brand perception, brand awareness, brand loyalty and brand association
are the key approaches in building, managing and protecting the brand strength
(Bhasin, 2019).
Two approaches have been proposed in measuring brand strength, that is; consumer-
based and company–based approaches (Kotler and Keller, 2012; Fetscherin, 2010).
Consumer-based approach emphasizes on the meaning of the brand and the value
that consumers place on it while company-based approach takes total value the brand
creates as the separable asset of the company (Fetscherin, 2010).
This study utilized the consumer-based approach to measure brand strength
considering that brands normally exist in the minds of customers not the company
(Kotler and Keller, 2012; Hagee, 2017) and hence, accurate and true understanding
of the brand strength was dependent on how customers respected, perceived and
thought about the brand (Fetscherin, 2010).
15
2.2.1.4. Brand awareness
Brand awareness refers to consumers’ ability to identify the brand under different
conditions or categories as reflected by their brand recognition or recall performance
(Kotler and Keller, 2012). Akkucuk and Esmaeili (2016) defined brand awareness as
the ability of the potential buyers to recognize or recall that ascertain brand is a
member of a certain product category.
Customers’ awareness to brand plays important role making decisions pertaining to
buying the products by affecting perceptions and tastes of the buyers (Kyei, 2016). If
the customer had already heard the brand name normally will feel more comfortable
at the time of making buying decision because customers do not prefer buying an
unknown brand (Akkucuk and Esmaeili; 2016; Kyei, 2016).
Bhasin (2019) viewed that brand awareness is the mindshare that a brand has among
its customers. Bhasin illustrates that if customer wants to buy soft drink and soft
drink brand Q comes to his mind first, then Q has a positive mindshare in the
customer. Also, if the consumer thinks that Q is the most of his/her purchase, it
implies that customer awareness to soft drink brand Q is positive (Bhasin, 2019).
From Bhasin (2019) illustrations, it is worth noting that the brand of the soft drink
which customers are more aware about should be given first priority throughout all
stages of making decisions regarding buying the soft drink thereby leading into high
sale performance over the brands which customers are completely not aware or
limited awareness.
2.2.1.5. Brand association
According to Rio, Vazquez and Iglesias (2001), brand association refers to other
informational nodes linked to the brand node in memory and contains the meaning of
the brand for consumers. Aaker (1991) defines brand association as thoughts and
ideas that held by individuals in their memory related to a specific service or a
product. He argued that some values of a brand are not visible and they can be based
16
on the association of the brand with certain factors or personalities that provide
confidence and credibility among the customers. Some brands can be associated with
other attributes, like good service; competitors trying to compete with this attribute,
it can be extremely difficult because of the established trust and faith of the customer
in the market (Aaker, 1991).
In order to understand the brand association of the products, one need to know how
much information is summarizing the meaning that consumers have about the
product (Rio et al., 2001). Kotler and Keller (2012) make classification of brand
associations into three major categories, 1) attributes, 2) benefits and 3) attitudes.
Attributes are the descriptive features characterizing a brand such as what a
consumer thinks the brand is or has and what is involved with its purchase or
consumption (Kottler and Keller, 2012). According to Lee and Leh (2011), symbolic
attributes of the brand are of four categories. The first is social image which can be
viewed as the consumer perception of the esteem in which the consumer social group
holds the brand. The second is perceived value which is a balance between the price
of a product and all its utilities. Third is trustworthiness which is the level of
confidence consumer places in the organization. The fourth and the last is country-
of- origin which can influence perceived quality and brand loyalty (Leh and Leh,
2011).
Benefits are just personal value consumers attach to the brand attributes, that is, what
consumers think the brand can do for them. Brand attitudes are consumers' overall
evaluations of a brand (Kottler and Keller, 2012).
2.2.1.6. Sales performance
A sale is defined as exchange of commodities, products or service for money
including the actions of manufacturers or sellers and the buyers (Kumar et al., 2006;
Shah et al., 2015). Selling the commodity, product or service is the foundation of
17
company’s revenues and profits on the particular product being sold. Normally, the
sales data of the products is recorded in the sales books.
The sales performance of the product can be understood directly by quantifying the
units of the particular product sold in markets or the amount of money paid on the
units of the products sold to customers (Kumar et al., 2006). Factors such as market
share of the product and direct observation of the frequency at which a product is
sold to customers in the market (Shafiq and Khan, 2016) are also used to measures
the sales performance of the products by the manufacturer/seller. In this study, the
sales performance was measured basing on the frequency of selling/buying the
particular soft drink product by the customers who were the sellers and buyers.
2.2.2. Review of related theory
This study was guided by the Attitude Theory which relies on the assumption that
the more a person has a favorable attitude towards a given product/service, the more
likely that person is to buy or use that product/service (Erick, 2015). The term
attitude forms a major construct of this theory and is useful to understand how
attitude of the consumers towards the product/brand affects in sale performance.
Researchers who have tried to use this theory in their studies attempted to provide
the meaning of the term attitude. According to Mugambi (2013), attitude refers to a
degree to which a person has a favorable or unfavorable evaluation of the behavior of
interest.
Gibson et al. As cited by Erick (2015) define attitude as a positive or negative feeling
or mental state of readiness, learned and organized through experience that exerts
specific influences on a person’s response to people, objects and situations.
Attitude of the customers of the product refers to the feeling of liking or disliking
which have towards products, stores, brands and other marketing stimuli (Erick,
2015). The attitude of the customers is very important to the manufactures and sellers
because it provides a summary of the information which have direct effect on the
intentions and behaviors of buying and using the product (Erick, 2015).
18
Attitudes are learned and those which result in purchase behavior are formed as the
result of direct experience with the product, information acquired from others or
exposure to the various advertising programs of the product (Hawkins et al., 1989 as
cited in Erick, 2015). Branding tries to assigns the product with their unique names,
terms, sign, symbols or designs or their combinations to enhance gaining experience
and familiarity with the product. Branding tries to affect the minds of customers as
they interact with the brand owner and brand (Hagee, 2017).
Based on the Attitude theory, if branding manages to influence positively the feeling
or mental state of readiness among customers to buy and use the product/brand, the
sales performance would increase. It orders to achieve this, branding should focus on
increasing customers’ attention to brand and reducing recognition of certain
competing brands whilst trying to built positive feelings or mental state about the
brand (Sabharwal et al., 2016).
One of the major weaknesses of the Attitude theory is lack of objectivity due to lack
of established common measures of attitudes of customers about the product/brand
(Mugambi, 2013). When this theory is applied by the researcher to guide
understanding of the influence of attitude customers in making buying decisions of
the product, it is upon the researcher to establish how the attitude should be
measured. This has been the source of rise of different measurements of the attitudes
of customers among different researchers on the same or similar research problem.
One of the most adopted measure of the attitude is the use of scales whereby the
customers should indicate the extent which the like or dislike buying or using the
product/brand (Henn, Weinstein and Foard, 2015). Using this scale, the extent which
the attitude on the product is whether positive or negative can be made by looking at
the weight/score give by the customer on the scale. If five is the highest can indicate
very positive, four indicating positive, three indicating neutral, 2 indicating negative
and 1 indicating very negative (Henn et al., 2015).
19
In this study, the questionnaire which comprises the Likert type scale of questions
constructed in five levels, five [5] indicating the highest and one [1] indicating the
lowest was adopted to quantify overall opinions, knowledge and experience which
changes with learning and experience of individual about the product/brand. This
enabled to understand the impact of branding on the sales performance of the soft
drink products of the company.
Despite the weaknesses of the Attitude theory highlighted above, it has remained
very common in several studies exploring the intentions of customers to use various
products. For instance, Sarwar et al. (2016) used Attitude theory to examine the
impact of branding on customer buying behavior. It was established that brand
knowledge is very important factor in consumer buying decisions making. When
consumers were more aware of the brand and had all the knowledge about the prices,
quality, manufacturers and availability, they were more attracted and decided to buy
the product/ brand.
Erick (2015) used the Attitude theory to examine the customer perceptions on e-
banking in commercial banks in Tanzania by involving 184 customers of CRDB
Bank, NBC bank, NMB Bank, DCB Bank and TPB Bank in Dar es Salaam. The
research established that customer perceptions on benefits of e-banking was the
driving factor of involvement is e-banking transactions. The researcher highlighted
that customer perceptions on risks associated with e-banking did not restrict them
from making e-banking transactions.
Kiunsi (2013) used Attitude theory to study e-banking and customer’s perceptions in
Tanzanian commercial banks specifically at CRDB Bank Tanzania Limited. It was
established that establishment of e-banking was the function of customers’ positive
attitude on the need of e-banking specifically perceived convenience; time saving,
perceived usefulness and perceived and ease of use.
Mazwile (2014) used Attitude theory to investigate the influence of e-banking on
service delivery satisfaction to bank customers in Tanzania. It showed that positive
20
perception of the respondents in terms of usage, convenience, time saving,
transportation cost and quickness of service delivery influenced establishment of
electronic banking products.
Equally, the current study selected the Attitude theory to guide the examination of
the impact of branding on the sales performance of soft drink products in Tanzania.
Through the customers’ attitudes, the researcher was able to understand and make
analysis of the research findings on four objectives as indicated below.
2.2.3. Factors influencing branding
Branding is perceived to be a main strategy that companies use to affect relationship
between brand and customers such as creation of recognition, attraction and
differentiation (Kotler and Keller, 2012; Hagee, 2017). Through branding, the
company is able to change positively the attitude of customers and purchase behavior
of its products/brands (Hagee, 2017).
Some studies reported that branding not only to identify and differentiate the
products in the market but also change the attitude and behavior that customers have
about the products or brands. For instance, Alamgir et al. (2014) found that branded
cars had a great place in consumers’ minds and consumers preferred purchase of a
well known branded cars.
Also, Sabharwal et al. (2016) reported that was able to increase customer attention to
brand while reducing recognition of certain competing brands. In the same context,
Akkucuk and Esmaeili (2016) reported that when customer had already heard the
brand name, they felt more comfortable at the time of making a decision as they did
prefer buying an unknown brand.
21
2.2.4. Brand strength
According to Bhasin (2019), a brand may have positive or negative strength. The
attitude is therefore very useful when judging the strength of the brand. The positive
or negative brand strength depends on the attitudes which customers have about the
brand whether they respect the brand or disrespect the brand (Fetscherin, 2010).
2.2.5. Influence of brand awareness on the sales performance
When customers have positive awareness and attitude on the brand, its sales
performance is normally high because a product with a high level of brand awareness
will receive higher consumer preferences (Akkucuk and Esmaeili, 2016).
Also, people generally tend to buy brands that they are familiar/ experience with and
on which they have confidence (perceived behavioral control). When selling the
product/brand, normally unknown brand face tough competition from the brands
already having a place in the market (Hoyer and Brown, 1990).
Akkucuk and Esmaeili (2016) noted that if the customer had already heard the brand
name, the customer would feel more comfortable at the time of making buying
decisions because they not prefer buying an unknown brand.
Bhasin (2019) contended that in order a brand to have high sale performance, the
attitude in the mindshare of customers should be positive. The same is agreed by
number of researchers reporting positive influence of brand awareness in buying the
product/brand (Akkucuk and Esmaeili, 2016; Kyei, 2016).
It is worth noting that, the brand which customers are more aware with normally has
positive mindshare and hence, they are given first priority during product search and
in purchasing and hence, particular product should account higher sale performance.
2.2.6. Influence of brand association on the sales performance
Brand association is categorized based into attributes, benefits and attitudes (Kotler
and Keller, 2012). The attributes refer to expressive features of the brand to
22
customers such as the ways they think the brand is about, what the brand has or what
are involved with the purchase or consumption of the brand (Rio et al., 2001).
Lee and Leh (2011) categorized symbolic attributes that affect the sale performance
of the products into social image, perceived value, trustworthiness and the country of
origin. Authors elaborates that social image is based on consumer’s perception of the
esteem in which the consumer’s social group holds the brand. The perceived value is
a balance between the price of a product and all its utilities. The trustworthiness
refers to the level of confidence consumer places in the organization. The country of
origin refers to the country or place where the brand/product is made which
influences perceived quality and brand loyalty (Lee and Leh, 2011).
Benefits refer to all values of the brand/product which consumers attach to it. These
benefits include what consumers think the brand can do for them (Rio et al., 2001).
Attitudes towards the brand refer to the overall evaluations of a brand whether good
or bad by the consumers (Rio et al., 2001).
Akkucuk and Esmaeili (2016) reported that brand association did not seem to
influence purchase decision of the product. On the contrary, Kyei (2016) found that
brand association had positive and significant association with consumer purchase
decision making.
2.3. Empirical literature
Singht (2013) research entitled “the impact of branding strategy on consumers
buying behavior” established that branding was affecting all stages of consumers’
purchase decisions making from need recognition through information search,
evaluation of alternatives, purchase and post purchase behavior.
Makki (2014) investigated the influence of branding on consumer behavior which
took Palais Hansen Kempinski Vienna as the case study. The target population of the
study comprises both, the management and customers of the hotel. Required data
were collected by using face-to-face interviews with the Hotel manager and through
23
distribution of the questionnaires to customers of the Hotel. Makki establishes that
branding enabled the company’s products to be the standout in the market place.
Sarwar et al. (2016) examined the impact of branding on customer buying behavior.
Their research used a survey research design and the research data were obtained
through distribution of the survey questionnaires to 80 people. Among them, 78 (44
males and 33 females) managed to complete their questionnaires.
Sarwat et al. established that brand knowledge is very important factor in consumer
buying decisions making. When consumers were more aware of the brand and had
all the knowledge about the prices, quality, manufacturers and availability, they were
more attracted and decided to buy the product/ brand.
Akkucuk and Esmaeili (2016) examined the impact of branding on consumer buying
behavior drawing empirical evidence from Smartphone buyers which comprised the
first and second year students in the management profession in one of the University
in the Istanbul District in Turkey. The main objective of this research was to
investigate how smartphone brands can influence consumers’ buying decisions.
Akkucuk and Esmaeili used the samples of 400 students and the required data were
gathered using the questionnaire which was provided directly to the students during
the class session between December 2015 and February of 2016. Out of the total
respondents give questionnaire, 171 completed the questionnaires and were used for
data analyses. The researchers used SPSS computer program was to analyze research
data with the aid of frequencies, cross-tabulations, correlations and regression
analyses. In order to explain the structure within the 15 Likert scale questions in the
survey EFA analysis was applied. Also, the factor option of SPSS was used to
calculate the factor loadings.
Akkucuk and Esmaeili established that majorities of the Smartphone buyers’
decisions were mainly influenced by brand awareness. The researchers established
further that brand association did not seem to influence purchase decision for the
24
Smartphone buyers. It was concluded and generalized that a majority of the
consumers’ purchase decisions are mainly influenced by brand loyalty and brand
awareness. Brand association has no influence on the customers’ purchase decisions
as much as brand awareness for the 171 samples used by the study.
Kyei (2016) assessed the effect of branding on consumer behavior in Telecom
companies in Ghana. The researcher was guided by four objectives and the first one
sought to examine the branding strategies employed by Ghanaian Telecom
companies. The second objective sought to investigate customers view on branding
in the Ghanaian Telecom companies. The third objective sought to evaluate the
impact of branding on the consumer behaviours of Ghanaian Telecom companies.
The fourth and the last objective sought to evaluate the relationship between
branding and consumer buying behaviour among Ghanaian Telecom companies.
Both descriptive and longitudinal research design were adopted. The population of
the study comprised 230 customers and 20 service providers of the Ghanaian
Telecom companies. A structured questionnaire was designed to facilitate collection
of the primary data. The data which were collected were further analyzed
quantitatively using descriptive statistics with the aid of SPSS program and
Microsoft Excel and the results were presented using tables and charts.
Kyei established that brand awareness had positive and significant association with
consumer buying behavior. Further, it was established that brand association had
positive and significant association with consumer buying behavior. The conclusion
of this research was that branding has the positive and statistically significant
influence on the branding and customer buying behavior among Ghanaian Telecom
companies. It concluded further that brand awareness has positive and statistically
significant influence on the customer buying behaviors among Ghanaian Telecom
companies.
Kyei’s research result was contrary with the results by Akkucuk and Esmaeili (2016)
as already discussed earlier. The difference arises in the sense that Akkucuk and
25
Esmaeili found that brand association did not seem to influence purchase decision for
the Smartphone buyers.
Alamgir et al. (2014) conducted research to determine the influence of brand name
on consumer decision making process drawing experience from car buyers. The aims
of their research were to create a deeper consideration of what influence a brand
name can have when people go for purchasing, choose the products between
different brands, especially private vehicle like car and to explore the relation
between brands and the consumer decision making process.
The study population comprises 100 respondents who have knowledge and
experience in buying verities cars with the aid of simple random sampling and a
convenience sampling procedure. The required data was obtained from the primary
sources mainly survey questionnaire which was administered through personal -
contact approach and the secondary sources mainly existing literatures on the
influence of brand name on consumer decision making process.
Alamgir et al. established that when consumers purchased the cars, brand names of
the cars influenced their choices most. The branded cars were having the great place
in the minds of buyers and they preferred to purchase the well known branded cars.
Also, researchers reported that consumers did not want to buy new cars/unknown
branded cars because of lack of information, knowledge and awareness about those
cars.
Yeboah (2016) investigated the impact of product branding on sales revenues of
listed companies in Ghana. The case study approach was used taking Unilever Ghana
Limited. The quantitative research design was adopted and the required data was
collected by administering a survey questionnaire employees and customers of the
company. The obtained data was analyzed quantitatively with the aid of regression
analysis which was guided by the linear regression model/equation.
26
Yeboah reported that product branding had long run positive impact on the sales
revenues but did not have significant short tin impact on the sales revenues. It was
concluded that branding (trademarks and brand awareness) significantly has the long
run positive impact on sales of the company products. Finally, Yeboah concludes
that normally the companies which create and manage effectively their brand have
the tendencies of securing and maintaining more sales in the long run. In order to
achieve this, it was suggested that the companies should focus on the long run impact
of branding instead of the immediate impact of branding.
Shafiq and Khan (2016) on the effect of marketing and branding on sales
performance via Media of employees training in Telecom industries in Pakistan.
Their study found that marketing and branding practices significantly predicted the
sales performance in the Telecom sector.
Rotich et al. (2016) in particular reported that brand reinforcement of smart shopping
to the customers had positive effect on the brands sales performance.
2.4. Research gap
Earlier researcher has shown that branding the product increases sales performance
(Singht, 2013; Makki, 2014; Sarwar et al., 2016 Yeboah, 2016; Shafiq and Khan,
2016; Rotich et al., 2016) by creating recognition, differentiating and even by
increasing customer attention to brand and reducing recognition of certain competing
brands (Sabharwal et al., 2016).
Alamgir et al. (2014) stresses further that consumers normally do not want to buy
unbranded products because they had no much information about it. Hence, if a
product is to increase or maintain its sales performance over period of time, strong
brand name should be built, managed and protected (Bhasin, 2019).
Some other researchers reported contradicting results on the influence of brand
awareness and brand association on the sales of the products. For instance, Akkucuk
27
and Esmaeili (2016) claimed that only brand awareness had positive influence on the
sales but brand association did not seem to sales of smart phone buyers. Also, Kyei
(2016) and Alamgir et al. (2014) found that both brand awareness and brand
associations had positive and significant association with sales of the products.
Observing this research gap created by conflicting ideas, this study was motivated to
cover the gap by examining the impact of branding on the sales performance of the
soft drink products in Tanzania drawing experience from SBC.
2.5. Conceptual framework
In order to achieve four study objectives, the conceptual framework that guided the
study assumed that the sales performance of soft drink products was being dependent
on the branding, brand strength, brand awareness and brand association. The
relationship of these independent variables and dependent variable is shown by
Fig.2.1 in the next page of this dissertation.
28
Figure 2. 2: Conceptual framework on the impact of branding on the sales performance of soft drink products
Source: Researcher’s Conceptualization (2020)
Branding Creating recognition of the
product Differentiating the product Customer attention Reducing recognition of competing
Brand strength Respect to brand Perception on the brand Thinking about the brand
Brand association Attributes Benefits Attitudes
Brand awareness Brand recognition abilities Brand recall abilities Brand’s mind share among
customers
Sales performance Frequency of buying particular soft drink by customers
29
Tables 2.1: Explanation of the conceptual framework
S/N Variables Definition Category of the variable
Indicators Measurement techniques
1 Branding
… whatever assigned to the product for creating recognition and distinguishing the product from all others in the market (Kottler and Keller, 2012)
Independent
Whether or not branding is used as the factor of creating recognition of soft drinks of the company
Whether or not branding is used as the factor of differentiating soft drinks of the company
Whether or not branding is used as the factor of drawing attention of customers on soft drinks of the company
Whether or not branding is used as the factor of reducing attentions of customers on soft drinks of company’s competitors
Whether or not identifying and distinguishing the brand influence buying the brand
Ordinal scale
2 Brand strength
…value carrying the brand from customers’ perceptions (Bhasin, 2019).
Independent
Whether or not soft drink brand gain respect in terms of admiration among customers
Perception of customer about the brands among his/her favorite soft drinks
Customer thinking about the quality of the soft drink brands of the company
Whether or not the values carrying the brand influences buying the brand
Ordinal scale
25
S/N Variables Definition Category of the variable
Indicators Measurement techniques
3 Brand awareness
… ability of the potential buyers to recognize or recall that a certain brand is a member of a certain product category (Akkucuk and Esmaeili, 2016)
Independent
Whether or not the brand is easily recognized when making purchase among customers
Whether or not the brand is easily to recall when making purchase among customers
Whether or not the brand constitutes most of customer purchase of soft drinks
Whether or not the brand comes first in the mind of customer when he/she wants to buy soft drink.
Whether or recalling the brand influenced buying the brand
Ordinal scale
4 Brand association
… thoughts and ideas that held by individuals in their memory related to a specific service or a product (Aaker, 1991)
Independent
Attributes/features does customer think that the brand has basing on their experience.
Benefits consumers think the brand can offer to them
Attitude customer has on the brand
Whether or not ideas customer has about the brand influence buying the brand
Ordinal scale
5 Sales performance
… act of exchanging the product for money that involve seller/manufacturer and the buyer (Kottler and Keller, 2012)
Dependent Frequency of buying
particular soft drinks among customers
Ordinal scale
Source: Researcher’s Conceptualization (2020)
26
CHAPTER THREE
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
3.1. Introduction
This chapter elaborates the research methodologies that were employed to
accomplish the study, that is; research design, area where the study, target
population, sampling techniques and sample size, data collection methods and data
analysis procedure.
3.2. Area of the study
The area of the study refers to a physical place within which researcher intend to
inquiry the phenomenon (Henn et al., 2015). When selecting the area of the steed, it
is advised that the area must be the one where required information about the
problem can be obtained by inquiring individuals who are familiar or experience
with the problem (Ndunguru, 2007). It is from the above factor this study selected
SBC in Dar es Salaam as its area of study. The SBC is among the successfully soft
drink bottling companies in Tanzania since its establishment in 2001. The company
is used to produce varieties of soft drinks each identified and differentiated from
sister products and competing products through branding.
The names, terms, signs, symbols, designs or some combinations are used in this
endeavor and they are evident to all its common soft drinks mainly; Pepsi, Mountain
Dew, Mirinda and 7UP (SBC, 2019). This branding creates impact on the sales
performance of its products and brands and hence, SBC was the right company
where the information required achieving all objectives of the study was likely to be
collected.
27
3.3. Research design
The research design refers to a plan or strategy adopted for effective execution of the
study (Henn et al., 2015). Hakim (1987) in Henn et al. (2015) defined research
design as the aspect of research dealing with the aims, purposes, intentions and plans
of carryout the study within the practical constraints of location, time, money and
labor.
For this study which assessed the impact of branding on the sales performance of soft
drinks products in Tanzania, a case study design was adopted. The first reason for
choosing this design was to facilitate in-depth and intensive inquiry of the branding
the soft drink products and the sales performance within a single company.
Also, the case study design was appropriate to facilitate distribution of large copies
of questionnaire covering respondents who were available within a local place where
the company was located and selling its soft drinks. Furthermore, the use of case
study facilitates ease interactions of the researchers with the respondents which
reasoned the activities of distributions, follow-up and collection of the filled
questionnaires.
Further, the results obtained using the case study designs were capable of drawing
conclusion on the impact of branding on the sales performance of soft drinks
products in Tanzania by restricting to the single company where the study was
conducted, that is Seven Up Bottling Company (SBC) in Dar es Salaam.
3.4. Target population
The target population refers to the things or people that the study intends to gather
required information (Henn et al., 2015). The essential attributes of the target
population are that the members must be familiar with the problem being studied and
willing to provide the useful information that will assist to achieve objectives of the
study by answering research questions (Kombo and Tromph, 2006).
28
As the study wanted to assess the impact of branding on the sales performance of soft
drinks products, a target population of 400 individuals comprising the employees in
the sales and marketing department of the company and corporate customers was
used. This is because customers and sales and marketing staff of the company were
the most appropriate individuals who had experience and information that could
facilitate achievement of the study objectives pertaining to, 1) the factors influencing
branding soft drink products at Seven Up Bottling Company, 2) the brand strength of
soft drink products manufactured by Seven Up Bottling Company, 3) the influence of
brand awareness on the sales performance of soft drink products at Seven Up
Bottling Company and 4) the influence of brand association on the sales performance
of soft drink products at Seven Up Bottling Company.
3.5. Sampling techniques and sample size
3.5.1. Sampling techniques
Sampling techniques are the set of methods used to select a portion of from the entire
population and it may be probabilistic or non-probabilistic sampling technique
(Ndunguru, 2007).
This study used the probability sampling technique mainly systematic sampling
technique to select a sample of 200 individuals comprising 9 employees and 191
corporate customers of the company. In order to select the samples using this
technique, the researcher obtained a list of sales and marketing staff of the company
who were 18 in total and list of corporate customers who were 382 in total. The list
was combined together and numbered whereby 1 to 18 were company’s sales and
marketing staff and from 19 - 382 were corporate customers.
A sampling interval (i) was determined by dividing total population (400) to the
desired sample (200). Finally, the researcher selected the first member from the list
and each of the next members after the sampling interval of 2 and the 200 samples
comprising 9 employees of the company and 191 corporate customers was obtained
at400th selection order.
29
The systematic sampling was suitable in the sense that it provided equal chances to
all individuals in the population to form the study samples. Also, this technique is
recommended to any study which involves statistical tests (Henn et al., 2015), the
context which the current study was in order to determine the impact of branding on
the sales performance of soft drink products at Seven Up Bottling Company.
3.5.2. Sample size
The sample refers to total sum of the individuals selected to represent the whole
population in the study (Henn et al., 2015). Using samples is recommended in
researches because it assists in making computations, economization of time and
resources (e.g., papers). Also, using sample is useful in making generalization and in
ensuring members of required population participates in the study instead of the
whole population which may not necessarily possess the required information
(Kombo and Tromph, 2006).
The sample size (n) of this research was computed with the aid of Taro Yamane
formula which is very common in researches which involve the finite or known
population (N) (Kombo and Tromph, 2006). This formula was suitable since the
total population (N) is known which was 400 individuals comprising 18 employees
and 382 corporate customers of the company.
Normally, Taro Yamane formula uses the 90% to 95% confidence level and 10% to
5% level of procession respectively depending on the size of population and the
sample size which the study wants to use. The current study used the confidence
level of 95% and 5% procession level since the size of population was relative small
and the researcher wanted to obtain large samples which could enable to detect very
small differences existed on the influence of both brands awareness and brand
associations on the sales performance of soft drink products.
The Taro Yamane formula uses the general expressions shown below:
n = N / [1+ N (e) 2]
Where :
30
n= required sample size;
N = A total target population which was 400 individuals
e = level of precession which was 5% = 0.05
By substituting N into the formula, the ‘n’ the value was obtained as follows:
n = 400/ [1+400(0.05)2] = 400 ÷ 2= 200 samples.
Using systematic simple random sampling, 200 samples were obtained from 400
population using sampling internal (i) of 2. The researcher selected the first member
in the random list of all study population and next members after interval of 2. Until
the 400th member, a sample of 200 was constructed comprising 9 staff and 191
corporate customers of the company.
3.6. Data collection method
A self-administered questionnaire was the method of collecting primary data in this
study. A questionnaire is a common method of collecting primary data which
contains questions that can be asked either in a closed or open format and may
employ the use of attitude scale (Henn et al., 2015).
This questionnaire contained the closed ended questions which were prepared in
English. In order to quantify the opinions, knowledge and experience the respondents
on the impact of branding on the sales performance of the soft drink products, all
questions of the questionnaire were based on the Likert scale of five points that is;
extremely agree [5], agree [4], neither [3], disagree [2] and extremely disagree [1].
All questions were developed based on the researcher’s understanding of relevant
concepts, variables and ideas of the consulted literature ad empirical researches. This
Likert type questionnaire was preferred so as to quantify opinions, knowledge and
experience of individuals on the impact of branding on the sales performance of the
soft drink products of the company.
.
There was a total of six sections in the questionnaire. The first section contained
questions which were guided the study to obtain data on the demographic
information of the respondents. The questions in this section were based on the ages,
31
sex, education levels and years which respondents had been the customers/employees
of the company.
The second subsection contained items/questions which guided the study to collect
data on the factors influencing branding soft drink products at SBC. The third
subsection contained items/questions which guided the study to obtain data on brand
strength of soft drink products manufactured by SBC.
The fourth subsection contained items/questions which guided the study to collect
data on the influence of brand awareness on the sales performance of soft drink
products at SBC. The fifth subsection contained items/questions which guided the
study to collect data on the influence of brand association on the sales performance
of soft drink products at SBC. Section six contained items/questions which guided
the study to collect data on the sales performance of soft drink products of the
company. This questionnaire is appended as Appendix I.
3.7. Data analysis
Data analysis refers to the logical and structured way of establishing relationships of
the diverse opinions into a meaningful way and logical sense with the aid of coding
and computations (Henn et al., 2015). The opinions, knowledge and experienced of
the respondents on the series of questions in the questionnaire were analyzed
quantitatively with the aid of descriptive statistics and presentation used tables of
total scores and mean values.
The relationship between brand awareness and brand association with the sales
performance of the soft drinks products was determined with the aid of correlation
and regression analysis.
The data analysis procedure started with collection of the filled questionnaires from
the respondents which were then checked to see their completeness and
comprehensiveness. The study planned to gather data from 200 samples. However, a
total of 41 respondents (20.5%) did not complete questionnaires and hence, the
response rate used for data analysis was 159 (79.5%) which was considered
32
appropriate because any response rate from 50% is sufficient for data analysis
(Babbie, 2002).
All responses were coded by assigning number on each response as tags. This
ensured that all answers on the items/questions are represented by specific number.
Except the answers on the items/questions that solicited data on the demographic
information of the respondents, all answers on the items/questions in each research
objective was given number depending on the point in the Likert scale; 5 was the
maximum number that denoted extremely agree, 4 = agree, 3 = neither, 2= disagree,
1= extremely disagree.
The coded data were recorded into Ms Excel and transferred into STATA program
version 11.2 where the data were analysis quantitatively. All data on the factors
influencing branding soft drink products at Seven Up Bottling Company, brand
strength of soft drink products manufactured by Seven Up Bottling Company, brand
awareness on the sales performance of soft drink products at Seven Up Bottling
Company and brand association on the sales performance of soft drink products at
Seven Up Bottling Company as referred to the first, second, third and fourth
objectives of the study were analyzed using descriptive statistics and presentation
used tables of total score and mean score. The following was the interpretation of the
rating scale
Table 3. 1: Interpretation of the rating scale
S/N Mean range Responses made Interpretation with respect to
brand strengths of soft drinks
1 4.5 to 5.0 Extremely agree Positive
2 3.5 to 4.4 Agree Positive
3 2.6 to 3.4 Neither Neutral
4 1.5 to 2.5 Disagree Negative
5 1 to 1.4 Extremely disagree Negative
Source: Researcher’s construct (2019)
33
The factor analysis was performed to identify and eliminate outliers. The most
influential factors were used to perform correlation and regression analysis with the
aim of identifying the relationship between two dependent variables, that is; brand
awareness and brand association with one dependent variable, that is; sales
performance of soft drinks. The correlation analysis was based on the following
regression equation.
Y= α + β1A1 + β2A2 + µ
Where:
Y = Sales performance of soft drinks
A1 =Brand awareness
A2 = Brand association
β = Coefficients
µ = Error term
α = Constant
The binary data was used to facilitate correlation and regression analysis and were
constructed based on the response of the respondents on three questions as indicated
by Section Six of the questionnaire (Appendix I). These questions asked 1)
experience of the respondents regarding the frequency of buying/selling soft drinks
products manufactured by SBC, 2) opinion regarding the influence of brand
awareness among customers on the frequency of buying particular soft drinks
products, and 3) opinion regarding the influence of brand association (experience
with brand features) on the frequency of buying particular soft drinks.
The responses on these questions were translated into binary data basing on the
following interpretations.
Table 3. 2: Translations of the responses into binary data
S/N Response made Translations 1 Very high High 2 High High 3 Low Low 4 Very low Low
Source: Researcher’s construct (2019)
34
3.7.1. Assumptions of linear regression equation
The linear regression equation in section 3.7 had the following assumptions. The first
assumption is that A1 and A2 are independent to each other, that is, there is
multicollinearity. Also, both A1 and A2 have positive relationship with Y. Again, the
equation assumes that there would be certain level of sales performance of soft
drinks irrespective the presence of A1, and A1 which is represented by constant term
(α).
Furthermore, the equation assumes that there are some other factors which would
influence sales performance of soft drink products which are not included in the
model (µ). Therefore, the influence of A1 and A1 on Y is unlikely to be100 per cent.
3.8. Validity and reliability
3.8.1. Validity
Validity is the measure of quality of the research data which should be real, rich and
deep (Henn et al., 2015). Based on Heale and Twycross (2015), validity refers to a
measure of the level of accuracy of the measurement of the data collection
instrument. Heale and Twycross classify the validity into the content validity and
construct validity. The former refers to the level which data collection instrument
accurately measures all aspects of the research. The later refers to the level which
data collection instrument measures the intended construct.
In order to increase the level of validity of the questionnaire of this research, all
questions were developed in line with the specific objectives which in turn focused
on addressing research gap. Also, all the concepts, variables and ideas in the
questionnaire were extracted based on researcher’s knowledge and understanding of
the consulted literature and empirical researches.
Furthermore, the questionnaire was compared against the questionnaires used for
data collections by Makki (2014) and Kyei (2016) in their researches on the
35
influence of branding on consumer behavior and effect of branding on consumer
behavior respectively. This enable to ensure that all aspects which were supposed to
be included on the related questions are included which increased contents and
construct validity.
3.8.2. Reliability
Reliability refers to an assurance that particular data collection method could produce
the same results if it is used over a period of time or across different studies (Heale
and Twycross, 2015). Henn, et al. (2015) defines reliability as the generalization of
hard data that is replicable by other researchers. Saunder et al. as cited by Erick
(2015) clarify that reliability indicates the degree to which data collection method
will yield consistent findings or similar observations would be made or conclusions
reached by other researchers or there is transparency in how sense was made from
source. Masue (2010) as cited by Rutaihwa (2018) defines reliability as the degree of
consistence within which instances are assigned to the same category by different or
the same observers in different occasions.
Henn et al. (2015) contend that there are many techniques of ensuring reliability of
data collection method and one of them is enabling colleagues of the researcher to
check and scrutinize the data collection instrument against its appropriateness,
consistency, and faithfulness and due considerations of the respondents.
Rutaihwa (2018) argues that reliability increases with the procedures which the
researcher undertakes to increase it by ensuring that data collection methods are
checked by the research supervisor, fellow students and other relevant academic
staffs in order to get comments for adding, deleting or holding some items for the
suitability of the research.
With the vast techniques of ensuring reliability, one of the important techniques
adopted by the researcher to increase reliability of the questionnaire was transmission
of the questionnaire for review by colleagues and friends having vast experience in
36
researches and statistics. Their opinions/suggestions were very useful for making
necessary amendments of the questions and improving the wordings in the
questionnaire.
Next, the questionnaire was submitted for review by the University supervisor. His
opinions and commends were very useful to ensure that the questionnaire capture all
aspects of the study. The amendments were made to broaden the questionnaire by
encompassing all necessary aspects so as to increase its completeness and
appropriateness. The questionnaire that was them used for data collection was the
one approved by the University supervisor.
3.9. Ethical considerations
Ethical consideration was among the very important aspects which ensured and
maintained standards of this research throughout the procedure of its preparation,
execution and reporting. The ethical issues which were involved by the researcher
included the following:
The researcher ensured that the study is conducted within the agreed time and
guideline by the University and the Supervisor. This study was schedule to complete
within six months from its preparation, execution and reporting. The researcher
endeavored to comply with the scheduled time. Though, based on the size of the
samples which was involved, extension time was officially requested to the
University through main supervisor and granted to complete dissertation/report
writing.
The researcher ensured that the permission for data collection from the University is
granted by the University which indicated that the proposal and data collection
instrument (questionnaire) were well prepared and satisfied the standards of the
University.
37
Prior to data collection, the researcher wrote a letter to the Managing Director of the
company asking for permission for data collection into the company and introduction
letter for data collection exercise.
During data collection, all respondents were informed about the study and its purpose
and finally they were requested for voluntary participation in the study.
38
CHAPTER FOUR
PRESENTATION OF THE FINDINGS
4.1. Introduction
In this chapter, the researcher is making presentation of the research findings basing
on the data obtained on each objective. The first subsection makes presentation of the
research finding results on the first objective about the factors influencing branding
soft drink products at Seven Up Bottling Company (SBC). The second subsection
makes presentation of finding results on the second objective about brand strengths
of soft drinks manufactured by SBC. The third subsection makes presentation of
finding results on the third objective about influence of brand awareness on the sales
performance of soft drink products at SBC. The fourth subsection makes presentation
of finding results on the fourth objective about the influence of brand association on
the sales performance of soft drink products at SBC. The last subsection is about test
of relationship between brand awareness and brand association on the sales
performance of soft drink products at SBC.
4.2. Factors influencing branding soft drink products at SBC
In order to identify the factors influencing branding soft drinks products at SBC, a
total of four factors were examined by involving respondents who were required to
indicate the extent which they agree or disagree with each factor.
The results revealed that branding soft drinks by SBC were influenced largely by
creation of recognition of the soft drinks in the market place whose mean score of
4.8. This was followed by other three factors namely; differentiating soft drinks from
competing soft drinks, drawing attention of customers on particular soft drink and
reducing recognition of competing product by customers which had mean scores of
4.5, 4.3 and 3.5 respectively. A summary of the results is shown by Table 4.1.
39
Table 4. 1: Factors influencing branding soft drink product at SBC
SN Items No. of respondents
Total score
Mean score
1 Creation of recognition of the soft drinks in the market place
159 747 4.8
2 Differentiating soft drinks from competing soft drinks 159 716 4.5 3 Drawing attention of customers on particular soft drink 159 684 4.3
4 Reducing recognition of competing product by customers
159 557 3.5
Source: Field data, 2019
The mean scores analysis in Table 4.1 reveals that creation of recognition of the soft
drinks in the market place and differentiating soft drinks from competing soft drinks
were extremely agreed factors influencing branding soft drink product at SBC at
mean scores 4.8 and 4.6 respectively. This was followed by two factors which were
agreed namely; drawing attention of customers on particular soft drink and reducing
recognition of competing product by customers at mean scores 4.3 and 3.4
respectively.
4.3. Brand strength of soft drinks manufactured by SBC
In order to assess brand strengths of soft drinks manufactured by SBC, four items
indicating brand strengths were examined by involving respondents/ consumers who
were required to indicate the extent which they agree or disagree with each item. A
summary of the results is shown by Table 4.2 in the page of this dissertation.
With regards to 7UP, the results revealed that customer perceptions on the strengths
of 7Up brand was negative and was represented by mean scores of 2.4, 2.4, 2.2 and
2.0 for respect of brand in terms of admiration of the brand, sense of favorite of the
brand, value given to brand a bad sense of quality of the soft brand among cus
With regard to Mirinda, the results revealed that customer perceptions on the strength
of Mirinda brand was positive and was represented by mean score 3.8, 3.6 and 3.5
for admiration of the brand, sense of favorite of the brand and sense quality of soft
drink among customers respectively.
40
Similar results were obtained with regard to Pepsi which had the mean scores 4.1, 3.9
and 3.9 for respect of brand in terms of admiration among customers, sense of
favorite of the brand and sense of quality of soft drink among customers which
translated existence of positive brand strength of Pepsi soft drink.
With regard to Mountain dew, the results showed that mean scores for admiration
among customers, sense of favorite of the brand, sense of quality of soft drink by
customers and value given to brands by customers respectively were 3.1, 2.9, 3.0 and
2.7 respectively which means that Mountain dew soft drink had neutral brand
strength.
Table 4. 2: Brand strengths of soft drinks manufactured by SBC
SN Items
No.
of
resp
onde
nts
7UP Mirinda Pepsi Mountain
Dew
Tot
al
scor
e M
ean
sc
ore
Tot
al
scor
e M
ean
sc
ore
Tot
al
scor
e M
ean
sc
ore
Tot
al
scor
e
Mea
n
scor
e
1
Respect of brand in
terms of admiration
among customers
159 38
2 2.4 604 3.8
65
2 4.1
49
3 3.1
2 Sense of favorite of the
brand by customer 159
38
2 2.4 572 3.6
62
0 3.9
46
1 2.9
3 Sense of quality of soft
drink by customers 159
31
8 2.0 557 3.5
62
0 3.9
47
7 3.0
4 Value given to brands
by customers 159
35
0 2.2 525 3.3
57
2 3.6
42
9 2.7
Source: Field data, 2019
4.4. Influence of brand awareness on the sales performance of soft drink products at SBC
In order to identify the influence of brand awareness on the sales performance of soft
drink products at SBC, opinions of the respondents regarding buying decision of the
soft drink was determined basing on four items describing brand awareness and later
41
the influence of brand awareness on the sales performance was established with the
aid of statistical test.
A summary of the results is shown by Table 4.3 in the next page of this dissertation.
Table 4. 3: Brand awareness and the sales performance of soft drink products at SBC
SN Items No. of
respondents Total score
Mean score
1 Usually I would buy soft drink whose brand name is easily recognized
159 795 5.0
2 Normally recalling brand name influence my decision to buy particular soft drink
159 763 4.8
3 Usually a soft drink whose brand name comes first in my mind is the one I would buy most
159 731 4.6
4 Brand name is an important factor I consider most when buying soft drink
159 557 3.5
Source: Field data, 2019
Mean score analysis in Table 4.3 indicated that three statement that, usually I would
buy soft drink whose brand name is easily recognized, normally recognition and
recall of brand name influence decision to buy particular soft drink and usually a soft
drink whose brand name comes first in my mind is the one I would buy most had
mean score 5.0, 4.8 and 4.6 respectively. This means that respondents extremely
agreed with the influence of brand awareness in buying soft drink product in terms of
brand recognition, brand recall and positive mindshare.
Mean score of the item namely, brand name is an important factor I consider most
when buying soft drink was 3.5 which is means that it was also agree to influence
buying the soft drink products of the company and hence, creation of recognition was
also the elements of brand awareness that influenced sales performance of soft drinks
at SBC.
4.5. Influence of brand association on the sales performance of soft drink products at SBC
In order to identify the influence of brand association on the sales performance of
soft drink products at SBC, respondents opinions regarding buying decision of the
soft drink was determined basing on four items describing brand association and later
42
the influence of brand association on the sales performance was established with the
aid of statistical test. A summary of the results is shown by Table 4.4 in the next page
of this dissertation.
Table 4 4: Influence of brand association on the sales performance of soft drink products at SBC
SN Items No. of
respondents Total score
Mean score
1 Normally experience about the features of brand lead to final choice of soft drink
159 763 4.8
2 Normally ideas about the brand leads to final choices of a particular brand
159 747 4.7
3 Normally benefits expected of soft drink make buying of particular soft drink
159 716 4.5
4 Positive information about soft drink makes choice of particular soft drink
159 700 4.4
Source: Field data, 2019
Based on the results in Table 4.3, mean scores for three items namely; normally
experience about the features of brand lead to final choice of soft drink, normally
ideas about the brand leads to final choices of a particular brand and normally
benefits expected of soft drink make buying of particular soft drink were 4.8, 4.7 and
4.5 respectively which indicated extremely agree. The study concluded that features
associated with the brand of the soft drink, ideas associated with the brand and
benefits expected of a brand of soft drink were the factors of brand association which
had very high influence on the sales performance of soft drinks at SBC.
Also, mean score of the item namely; positive information about soft drink makes
my choice of particular soft drink was 4.4 which means that it was agree buying the
soft drinks of the company. This concluded that positive information associated with
the brand of soft drinks was also the elements of brand association which influenced
sales performance of soft drinks at SBC.
43
4.6. The influence of brand awareness and brand association on the sales performance of soft drink products at SBC
In order to determine the influence of both, brand awareness and brand association
on the sales performance of the soft drinks, statistical test of relationship was
performed with the aid of correlation and regression analyses.
4.6.1. Correlation analysis
The correlation analysis was performed in order to determine the nature of the
relationship between variables with the aid of Spearman's rank correlation. The
researcher correlated brand awareness and brand association as the independent
variables against sales performance of soft drink product as the dependent variable.
The correlation coefficients were used to establish the relationship exhibited by
variables. Normally, the correlation coefficient range between –1 and +1 and
negative and positive signs indicate that the two variables are negatively or positively
related. A correlation coefficient of 0 (zero) means that there is no relationship
between the variable/s and dependent variable being studied (Nyaledzigbor, 2015).
The correlation coefficients of the brand awareness, brand association and sales
performance of soft drinks at SBC was as shown in Table 4.5 in the next page of this
dissertation. Basing on the correlation coefficients, both brand awareness and brand
association had positive and moderate correlation with sales performance of soft
drink products, at 0.5158 and 0.5885 respectively, given that strength of the
correlation increases as the value of correlation coefficient approaches to 1
(Nyaledzigbor, 2015).
44
Table 4. 5: Correlation coefficients of the brand awareness, brand association and sales performance of soft drinks at SBC
Variables Correlation coefficients column 1
Correlation coefficients column 2
Correlation coefficients column 3
Sales performance 1.0000 - - Brand awareness 0.5158 1.0000 - Brand association 0.5885 0.3615 1.0000
Dep. Variable: Sales performance of soft drinks
Source: Field data, 2019
4.6.2. Regression analysis
Regression analysis was performed to test statistical significance of the relationship
that existed between brand awareness and brand association with sales performance
of soft drinks. The researcher regressed two independent variables above against one
dependent variables at 95% degree of freedom and 5% marginal error.
The regression coefficients of each independent variable were determined and p-
values and t-value were used to test the level of significance and statistical
significance of each individual coefficient respectively.
The standard values used to test the level of significance and statistical significance
of coefficients/variables was as follows: if p value < 5%; it means that the level of
significance of individual coefficient was high. If t value > 2; it means that individual
coefficient was statistically significant. A summary of results of regression analysis
is shown in Table 4.6.
45
Table 4. 6: Correlation coefficients of brand awareness and brand association against sales performance of soft drink products
Dep. variable: Sales performance of the soft drink product
Key:
Brandawarn~u = brand awareness
Brandassoc~r = brand association
-cons= constant
Source: Field data, 2019
The researcher evaluated coefficients of all variables using coefficients column and
the following results were found:
i. A regression coefficient for brand awareness is 0.35575 at p value 0.000) and t
value 5.54). These results inform that there is existence of a very high positive
and statistically significant relationship between brand awareness and sales
performance of soft drinks at SBC.
ii. A regression coefficient for brad association is 0.45905 at p value 0.000) and t
value 7.34. These results informed that there is existence of very high and
statistical insignificant relationship brand awareness and sales performance of
soft drinks at SBC.
46
iii. A regression coefficient of sales performance of soft drinks of .28812 at p
value 0.015 and t value 2.46. The conclusion reached is that there was a
positive and statistically significant relationship between brand awareness
and brand association with the sales parlance of soft drink products.
Next, the researcher evaluated the strength of the entire model using coefficient of
determination (R -Square) which is 0.4519. This means that about 45.19% of
variability of the dependent variable (sales performance of soft drinks) was
influenced by brand awareness and brand association. The remaining 54.81% of
variability of the dependent variable was influenced by other factors which were not
considered in the model.
Finally, the regression equation of the relationship between the influence of brand
awareness and brand association on the sales performance of soft drink was
established as follows:
Y= 0.28812+ 0.35575A1 + 0 .45905A2
Where:
Y = Sales performance of soft drinks
A1 =Brand awareness
A2 = Brand association
β = Coefficients which are 0.35575 and 0.45905 for brand awareness and brand
association respectively in the above equation.
Basing on the regression equation above, a unit increase in either brand awareness or
brand association while other factors are kept constant would lead to an increase in
sales performance of soft drink products at 0.35575 or 0.45905 respectively.
47
CHAPTER FIVE
DISCUSSION OF THE FINDINGS
5.1 Introduction
This chapter gives a thorough discussion of the research findings which was obtained
under the guidance of the research objectives by using the research question as the
tool to obtain relevant data relating to the research objectives.
5.2 Factors influencing branding soft drink products at SBC
The study found that the factors influencing branding soft drink products at SBC
creation of recognition of the soft drinks in the market place whose mean score was
4.8. This was followed by other three factors namely; differentiating soft drinks from
competing soft drinks, drawing attention of customers on particular soft drink and
reducing recognition of competing product by customers which had mean scores of
4.5, 4.3 and 3.5 respectively.
Hegee (2017) established that companies are able to change the attitude of customers
and purchase behavior of the products/services through branding by drawing
attention of customers on particular soft drink and reducing recognition of competing
product by customers are psychological factor and may change the attitude of the
customers and purchase behavior.
Basing on the Attitude theory, branding the product using names, labels, signs or
symbols has psychological effect that manifests in the change of attitude of
customers (Mugambi, 2013). These results indicated that branding was the means of
changing attitudes of customers towards the product/brand and hence, increasing
attention on the particular soft drinks as well as reducing recognition of competing
soft drinks among customers.
Furthermore, results translate that branding soft drinks by the company was not only
to identify and differentiate the products in the market but also to change the attitude
48
and behavior that customers about the products or brands. Similar results were
reported by Alamgir et al. (2014) stating that branded cars influenced choices among
customers/buyers. The branded cars occupied the great place in the minds of buyers
and customers preferred purchasing the well known branded cars. Alamgir et al.
report that car buyer did not want to buy new cars/unknown branded cars because of
lack of information, knowledge and awareness about those cars.
Furthermore, the results were consisted with Sabharwal et al. (2016) reported that
branding was able to increase customer attention to brand while reducing recognition
of certain competing brands. In the same context, Akkucuk and Esmaeili (2016)
reported that when customer had already heard the brand name, they felt more
comfortable at the time of making a decision as they did prefer buying an unknown
brand.
5.3 Brand strength of soft drinks manufactured by SBC
The strength of 7UP was generally negative and was represented by low mean scores
on each item responsible for brand strength that was around or below 2. Brand
strength of Mirinda and Pespi was generally positive. Meanwhile, the brand strength
of Mountain dew was neutral because mean scores of all items responsible for brand
strengths were round to 3.0.
These results explained the reasons why sales performance of 7UP was
comparatively very low compared with sister soft drinks which were assessed.
Normally, positive brand strength accompany with high sales performance of the
product while negative brand strength accompany with poor/low sales performance
of the product.
The results in Table 4.2 explained why the sales performance of 7UP soft drink of
the company was comparatively very low as compared with sister soft drinks which
were assessed. Normally, positive brand strength accompanies with high sales
49
performance of the product while negative brand strength accompany with poor/low
sales performance of the product (Kottler and Keller, 2012).
The above results were consistent with Bhasin (2019) addressing that positive brand
strength was manifested by high respect for brand among customer, positive thinking
about the quality and price of the brand while negative brand strength normally lacks
respect among customers as they think negative about the quality and price of the
brand ultimately the sales performance of the brand fall below the expectations.
The researcher was surprised why brand strength of 7UP not protected by the
company despite that the product is the one which brands the company as the whole
with the name, ‘Seven Up Bottling Company. Brand strength can be built, managed
and protected (Fetscherin, 2010). According to Bhasin (2019) improving brand
perception, brand awareness, brand loyalty and brand association are the key
approaches in building, managing and protecting the brand strength. Equally, the
brand strength of 7UP would have been improved and maintained in a continuous
basis by improving brand perception, brand awareness, brand loyalty and brand
association.
5.4 Influence of brand awareness on the sales performance of soft drink products at SBC
The results showed that brand awareness had influence on the sales performance of
soft drink products at SBC because all items describing influence of brand awareness
on the sales of the products specifically, brand recognition, brand recall and positive
mindshare had mean scores of 5.0, 4.8 and 4.6.
The above results are aligned with the research report by Akkucuk and Esmaeili
(2016) which reported that products that have high level of brand awareness receive
higher consumer preferences (Akkucuk and Esmaeili, 2016). Normally, individuals
tend to buy brands that they are familiar with and on which they have confidence
(perceived behavioral control). When selling the product/brand, normally unknown
50
brand face tough competition from the brands already having a place in the market
(Hoyer and Brown, 1990).
According to the results, the soft drink products that were frequently sold by the
Company, namely Pepsi and Mirinda, were the ones with high brand recognition,
high brand recall, positive mindshare and familiar brand name. In the research by
Akkucuk and Esmaeili (2016), the statement was proved. Researchers noted that if
the customer had already heard the brand name, the customer would feel more
comfortable at the time of making a decision as they not prefer buying an unknown
brand (behavioral intention).
Also, Bhasin (2019) studied sales performance of the product in the context of the
Attitude theory which highlights that in order a brand to have high sale performance,
the attitude in the mindshare of customers should be positive. As far as the sales of
soft drink products of SBC, the results translated that an element of awareness that
was responsible for frequent sales of Pepsi and Mirinda was possession of positive
mindshare in the minds of customers. In the contrary, 7UP whose sales performance
has remained very low is simply due to presence of negative mindshare in the minds
of customers.
Overall implication of the results is that brand awareness had great influence in
buying the product/brand. Normally the soft drink brand which customers were more
aware normally had positive mindshare and hence, they are given first priority during
product search and in purchasing and hence, particular product should account high
sale performance (Akkucuk and Esmaeili, 2016; Kyei, 2016).
5.5 Influence of brand association on the sales performance of soft drink products at SBC
the study revealed that brand association has influence on the sales performance of
soft drink products at SBC because all elements of brand associations that influence
sales of the product namely; features associated with the brand of the soft drink,
51
ideas associated with the brand and benefits expected of a brand of soft drink had
mean values of 4.8, 4.7 and 4.5 respectively.
Based on the results above, brand association in terms of the features associated with
the brand of the soft drink, ideas associated with the brand, benefits expected of a
brand of soft drink and positive information associated with the brand of soft drinks
are important in making buying decision of the soft drinks at SBC.
These results were consistent with Kyei (2016) research which found that brand
association had positive and significant association with consumer purchase decision
making.
However, the finding in Table 4.3 was contrary with the research by Akkucuk and
Esmaeili (2016) reporting that brand association did not seem to influence purchase
decision of the product. Whether or not brand association had influence on the sales
of soft drinks at SBC was subject to statistical tests with the aid of correlation and
regression analysis. The procedures adopted and the results which were found are
explained in the next subsection.
5.6 The results of regression analysis above dismissed the claim by Akkucuk and
Esmaeili (2016) that brand association do not have any influence on the purchase
decision among Smartphone buyers. Though, they support Akkucuk and Esmaeili
report pertaining to existence of positive influence of brand awareness on the
purchase decision of Smartphone buyers.
The finding results were also consistent with a number of earlier researchers in the
similar research areas such as Kyei (2016) report on the effect of branding on
consumer behavior in Telecom companies in Ghana which found that brand
awareness and brand association had positive and significant association with
consumer buying behavior.
52
Also, this study is consistent with report by Alamgir et al. (2014) on the influence of
brand name on consumer decision making process which used car buyers as the case.
Alamgir et al. reported that when customers went for purchasing cars, they preferred
purchasing a well known branded cars. Alamgir et al. observed that consumers did
not want to try new cars/unknown branded cars because they had no much
information about the lesser or unknown brands.
Also, the results in this study are aligned with Shafiq and Khan (2016) research on
the effect of marketing and branding on sales performance via Media of employees
training in Telecom industries in Pakistan. Shafiq and Khan found that marketing and
branding practices significantly predicted the sales performance in the Telecom
sector.
53
CHAPTER SIX
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
6.1. Introduction
This chapter provides the summary of the entire study, the conclusion,
recommendations, policy implication and areas for further researches.
6.2. Summary
This study aimed to examine the impact of branding on the sales performance of soft
drink products in Tanzania. A case study approach was used and Seven Up Bottling
Company in Dar es Salaam was selected for examination. Specifically, the study
aimed to address the factors influencing branding the soft drink products, the brand
strengths of soft drinks manufactured by Seven Up Bottling Company, the influence
of brand awareness on the sales performance of soft drink products, the influence of
brand association on the sales performance of soft drink products at Seven Up
Bottling Company. In order to achieve these objectives, the conceptual framework
was constructed which assumed that sales performance of soft drink products is
determined by four factors namely; branding, brand strength, brand awareness and
brand association.
The study was guided by the Attitude Theory which relies on the assumption that
the more a person has a favorable attitude towards a given product/service, the more
likely that person is to buy or use that product/service. The attitude was a major
construct of this theory and was used to understand how attitude of the consumers
towards the soft drink products/brands affected the sale performance of the particular
soft drinks products/brands of the company under study.
The conceptual framework which provided the relationships between variables of
this study was based on the assumption that sales performance of soft drink products
was being dependent on the branding, brand strength, brand awareness and brand
association.
54
A target population was 400 individuals comprising 18 employees in the sales and
marketing department of the organization and 382 corporate customers of the
company. Probability sampling technique specifically systematic sampling methods
was used to obtain the samples of 200 comprising 9 employees in the sales and
marketing department and 191 corporate customers of the company. The data
required to achieve the study objectives was gathered by administering questionnaire
to all 200 respondents. A total of 41 respondents (20.5%) did not complete
questionnaires and hence, the response rate that was used for data analysis was from
159 respondents (79.5%).
On branding the soft drinks products/brands of the company, the data were gathered
on four factors namely, creating recognition of the product, differentiating the
product, customer attention and reducing recognition of competing brands. On the
brand strengths of soft drinks manufactured by the company, the data were gathered
on three factors namely; respect to brand, perceptions towards the brand and thinking
about the brand. On the brand awareness, the data were gathered on the brand
recognition abilities, brand recall abilities and the share of the brands in the minds of
customers. On the brand association, the data were gathered on three factors namely;
attributes of the brand, benefits of the brand and attitudes towards the brand.
The obtained data were analyzed quantitatively with the aid of descriptive statistics
and presentation by the use of tables of total score and mean score. In order to test
the relationship between variables and ultimately determine the influence of brand
awareness and brand association on the sales of products both correlation and
regression analysis were performed and the contradiction was resolved.
The study found that the factors influencing branding soft drink products at SBC
creation of recognition of the soft drinks in the market place whose mean score was
4.8. This was followed by other three factors namely; differentiating soft drinks from
competing soft drinks, drawing attention of customers on particular soft drink and
reducing recognition of competing product by customers which had mean scores of
4.5, 4.3 and 3.5 respectively.
55
The strength of 7UP was generally negative and was represented by low mean scores
on each item responsible for brand strength that was around or below 2. Brand
strength of Mirinda and Pespi was generally positive. Meanwhile, the brand strength
of Mountain dew was neutral because mean scores of all items responsible for brand
strengths were round to 3.0. These results explained the reasons why sales
performance of 7UP was comparatively very low compared with sister soft drinks
which were assessed. Normally, positive brand strength accompany with high sales
performance of the product while negative brand strength accompany with poor/low
sales performance of the product.
The results showed that brand awareness had influence on the sales performance of
soft drink products at SBC because all items describing influence of brand awareness
on the sales of the products specifically, brand recognition, brand recall and positive
mindshare had mean scores of 5.0, 4.8 and 4.6.
Also, the study revealed that brand association has influence on the sales
performance of soft drink products at SBC because all elements of brand associations
that influence sales of the product namely; features associated with the brand of the
soft drink, ideas associated with the brand and benefits expected of a brand of soft
drink had mean values of 4.8, 4.7 and 4.5 respectively.
The above relationship was tested to identify the influence of brand awareness and
brand association with the sales performance of soft drink products using correlation
and regression analysis. Basing on the correlation coefficients, both brand awareness
and brand association had positive and strong correlation with sales performance of
soft drink products at correlation coefficients 0.5158 and 0.5885 respectively.
Also, regression coefficient for brand awareness is 0.35575 at p value 0.000 and t
value 5.54 which means that there is existence of high and positive and statistically
significant relationship between brand awareness and sales performance of soft
drinks at SBC.
56
Regression coefficient for brad association is 0.45905 at p value 0.000) and t-value
7.34 which means that there is existence of very high and statistical insignificant
relationship brand awareness and sales performance of soft drinks at SBC. A
constant value of regression coefficient of sales performance of soft drinks was
0.28812 at p value 0.015 and t value 2.46 which concludes that there is a positive and
statistically significant relationship between brand awareness and brand association
with the sales parlance of soft drink products.
6.3. Conclusion
6.3.1Factors influencing branding soft drink products at Seven Up Bottling Company
SBC branded its soft drink products due to a number of factors. The most important
one was to identify the soft drinks in the market place. Also, branding was
influencing by desired to differentiate soft drinks from competing soft drinks,
drawing attention of customers on particular soft drink and reducing recognition of
competing product by customers.
Therefore, branding was a key marketing strategy that enabled the company to
change attitude of customers and purchase behavior on its products/brands. In
addition, branding was enabled to increase customer attention to some brands
specifically Pepsi and Mirinda while reducing recognition of a number of soft drinks
that were competing with company’s soft drinks.
6.3.2 Brand strengths of soft drinks manufactured by Seven Up Bottling
Company
Brand strength is very important if the sales performance of the soft drink is to
increase or to be maintained. Once the brand strength of the product is allowed to be
negative in the minds of customers, the sales performance of particular product falls.
7UP for examples had negative brand strength while the brand strengths of the rest
sister brand which were frequently bought such as Pepsi and Mirinda was positive.
This explained why its sales performance was comparatively very low as compared
with sister soft drinks which were assessed. Normally, positive brand strength
57
accompany with high sales performance of the product while negative brand strength
accompany with poor/low sales performance of the product.
6.3.2 Influence of brand awareness and brand association on the sales
performance of soft drink products at Seven Up Bottling Company
Both brand awareness and brand association had influence on the sales performance
of soft drink products at SBC. This relationship was tested statistically using
correlation and regression analysis. Basing on the correlation coefficients, both brand
awareness and brand association had positive and strong correlation with sales
performance of soft drink products, that is; 0.5158 and 0.5885 respectively. Also,
regression coefficient for brand awareness revealed that there is existence of high
and positive and statistically significant relationship between brand awareness and
sales performance of soft drinks at SBC.
Brand association had very high and statistical insignificant relationship brand
awareness and sales performance of soft drinks at SBC. Also, regression coefficient
of sales performance of soft drinks of .28812 and hence there is a positive and
statistically significant relationship between brand awareness and brand association
with the sales parlance of soft drink products.
6.4. Recommendations
This study concludes that the company should use branding as the marketing strategy
of improving and maintaining brand strength of its soft drinks specifically 7UP
which brand strength was negative and hence, very low sales performance compared
with sister soft drinks. This brand strength could be built build, managed and
protected by improving brand perception, brand awareness, brand loyalty and brand
association.
Also, the company should ensure that it is increased brand awareness and improve
brand association in order to increase and maintain the sale performance of its soft
58
drinks. This is because both brand awareness and brand association were proved to
influence positively the sales performance of soft drinks.
The brand awareness should be increased with brand recognition; brand recall and
positive mindshare were the most influential factors of sales performance of soft
drinks at SBC. Brand association should be improved with the features associated
with the brand of the soft drink, ideas associated with the brand and benefits
expected of a brand of soft drink were the most influential factors on the sales
performance of soft drinks at SBC.
6.5. Implications of the study
The implications of this study are that branding is a candid marketing strategy that is
implemented by the company so as to identify the soft drinks in the market place, to
differentiate soft drinks from competing soft drinks, to draw attention of customers
on particular soft drink and to reduce recognition of competing product by
customers. Also, the study implies that possession of negative brand strength was the
factors responsible for poor sales performance of 7UP soft drink of the company.
Building positive brand strength seems to be very important strategy for improving,
increasing and even maintaining the sales performance of the soft drink product.
Also, both brand awareness and brand association had strong positive and
statistically significant relationship with sales performance of soft drinks. The
company would lean the market by increasing brand awareness and improving brand
association by increasing brand recognition, brand recall and positive mindshare in
the first hand and improving features associated with the brand of the soft drink,
ideas associated with the brand and benefits expected of a brand of soft drink on the
other hand.
6.6. Recommendations for further researches
The regression analysis which tested the relationship between brand awareness and
brand association on the sales performance revealed that there was a certain level of
sales performance of SBC soft drink irrespective the brand awareness and brand
59
association which was denoted by constant value (α) = 0.2881 at t value 7.34 and p
value 0.000.
Based on the regression model, only 45% of the variability of sales performance of
soft drinks of SBC was influenced by brand awareness and brand association. The
other 55% was explained by factors not included in the model (µ).
Therefore, further research is needed to examine other factors responsible for the
sales of soft drinks irrespective brand awareness and brand association and their
influence on the sales performance of soft drink products of the company
Also, the study adopted a case study design whereby examination of the impact of
branding on the sales of the product was based in single organization that is SBC in
Dar es Salaam. As the result, the finding results are not capable of making
generalization other Tanzanian companies; instead they are specific to the SBC Dar
es Salaam. Therefore, further researches are required in different soft drinks
manufacturing companies.
The researcher targeted a population of 400 individuals comprising 18 employees in
the sales and marketing department of the company and 382 corporate customers. A
systematic sampling technique was used to construct a sample of 200 individuals
comprising 9 employees and 191 corporate customers of the company using a
sampling interval of 2. However, no assurance that individuals selected into the
samples were the ones who had required information than others. Thus, similar
research is needed focusing on different sampling techniques and sample inclusion.
Again, a questionnaire contained uniform questions/items was designed to solicit
data by involving samples of 200 which comprised employees and customers of the
company. Given that research projects are not given priorities by most individuals in
Tanzania, a total of 41 respondents (20.5%) did not complete questionnaires and
hence, the response rate was not 100 per cent as expected. The research is needed to
see whether or not using the different response rate would provide the same or
different results.
60
REFERENCES
Aaker, D. A. (1991). Managing brand equity: Capitalizing on the value of a brand name. New York: Free Press.
Akkucuk, U., and Esmaeili, J. (2016). The impact of brands on cosnumer buying
behaviour: An empirical study on Smartphone buyers. International Journal of Markeing Research, Vol.15(4).
Alamgir, M., Nasir, T., and Shamsuddoha, M. (2014). Infleunce of brand name on
consumer decision making process: An empirical study on car buyers. International Jouranl of Research in Marketing, Vol.7(2).
Babbie, E. (2002). Survey Research Methods. Woodsworth: Belmont Publishers
Limited Bhasin, H. (2019). What is brand strenth? 4 Factors that build brand strenghts.
Journal of Business Studies and Humaaanities, Vol.9(1). Erick, C. (2015). Customer perceptions on e-banking in Tanzania: A case of selected
commercial banks in Dar es Salaam. Master degree dissertation (Unpublished). Mzumbe University.
Fetscherin, M. (2010). The determinatns and measurement of a country brand: the
country brand strngth index. Volume 27 (4). Gupta, C. B. (2005). Corporate Planning and Policy. New Delhi: Sultan Chand and
Sons Educational Publishers. Heale, R and Twycross, A. (2015). Validity and reliability in quantitative studies. A
Research Journal, Vol.18(3). Group.bmj.com. publishers Hegner, S. B. (2017). Using the theory of planned behaviour to understand brand
love. Jouranl of Human Pyschology Research, Vol.12 (9). Henn, M, Weinstein, M. and Foard, M. (2015). A Short Introduction to Social
research. New Delhi. SAGE Publication. Kikwilu, E.N., Mulder, J. and Frencken, J. E. (2008). Utilization of toothpaste and
fluoride contents in toothpaste manufactured in Tanzania. Vol.66(5). Kisunsi, S.B. (2013). E-Banking and customer perception in Tanzanian commercial
banks. The Case of CRDB Bank Tanzania Limited. A Master dissertation (Unpublished). Mzumbe University.
Kotler, P., and Keller, K. L. (2011). Marketing Management. New Jersey:, Prentice
Hall,.
61
Kombo, D.K. and Tromph, D.L.A. (2006). Proposal and Thesis Writing. (1st EEd):
Nairobi. Paulines Publications Krishnaswami, O.R. and Ranganatham, M. (2009). Methodology of Research in
Social Sciences. (1st Ed): Mumbai, Himalaya Publishing House. Kumar, S.A., Poornima, S.C., Abraham, M.K. and Jayashree, K. (2006).
Entrerpreneruship Development. New Delhi. New Age International Publishers.
Kyei, E.B. (2016). Assessing the effect of branding on consumer buying behaviour in
Telecoms Companies in Ghana. Masster degree dissertation (Unpublsihed). State Univeristy of Ghana
Lee, G. and Leh, F. (2011). Dimensions of Customer-Based Brand Equity: A Study
on Malaysian Brands. Journal of Marketing Research and Case Studies JMRCS, Vol.1(10).
Makki, F. (2014). Influence of branding on consumer buying behaviour: A case of
Palais Hansen Kempinsk Vienna. Bachelor degree thesis (Unpublshed). Harvaled Univeristy.
Mazwile, M. (2014). The Influence of Electronic Banking on Service Delivery
Satisfaction to Customers, the Case of NMB Bank in Tanzania. Master degree dissertation (Unpublished). Open University of Tanzania.
Mugambi, M.K. (2013). Effects of e-government strategy on service delivery in the
government ministries in Kenya. Master degree dissertation (Unpublished). University of Nairobi.
Ndunguru, P.C. (2007). Lecture on Research Methodology for Social Sciences.
Morogoro. Mzumbe University Publisher Rio, A.B., Vazquez, R. and Iglesias, V. (2001). The effects of brand associations on
consumer response. Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol.18(5). Rotich, J., Moriasi, J.K., Korir, S.C., Rono, E.K. and Asienyo, B.O. (2016). Effect of
Store Branding on the Brands Sales Performance of Consumer Goods in the Retail Stores in Nakuru Town, Kenya. International Journal of Innovation and Applied Studies, Vol. 4(3).
Rutaihwa, G.C. (2018). Assessment of challenges facing Dodoma Urban Water
Supply in providing water service to low income households: A case study of Chamwino and Chang’ombe streets. Master dissertation (Unpublished). St. John’s University of Tanzania
62
Sabharwal, S., Phatap, A. and Lamaba, V. (2016). Project report on consumer behaviour: impact of branding on consumer buying behaviour. Master degree dissertation (Unpublished). Jindal Global University.
Sarwar, F., Aftab, M. and Iqbal, M.T. (2014). The impact of branding on customer buying behaviour. Intanational Joural of Technology and Research.
Shafiq, A and Kham, A. (2016). The effects of markeitng and branding on sales
perfromance via media of employees training in telecoms industris in Pakistan. Vol.2(11).
Singh, B. (2013). Impact of branding strategy on consumer buying behaviour.
Research Journal of Art, Managemnt and Social Sciences. Vol.3(2) Surwar, F., Aftab, M. and Iqbal, M. F. (2016). The impact of branding on consumer
buying behaviour. Jounral of Social Sciencies Research, Vol.5(7). Yeboah, M. (2016). Impact of product branding on sales revenues of public listed
companies in Ghana. Internal Journal of Markeing and Commerce, Vol.6(9).
63
APPENDIX I: QUESTIONNAIRE
My name is Celestina Flavian Bwana, a master student at Mzumbe University - Dar
es Salaam Campus College pursuing a Master of Science in Marketing. I am
conducting research on the impact of branding on the sales performance of soft
drink products in Tanzania Seven Up Bottling Company which is one of the leading
manufacturers of soft drink products in Tanzania is selected by this study. This
research is a part of my study and information you give will be treated confidentially
and used for the academic purpose. I request your voluntary participation by
providing required information on the questions in this questionnaire.
Thank you in advance
Section One
Demographic information of the respondents: Tick () in the appropriate box. 1.1. What is your gender? Male […] Female […] 1.2. What is your age group? 18 to 24 years […] 25 to 34 years […] 35 to 44 […] 45 to 55 years […] More than 55 years […] 1.3. What is your education level? Secondary education […] Technician certificate […] Ordinary diploma […] University Degree […] Master’s degree […] PhD […] 1.4. How long have you been the customer/employee of the Company? Less than 6 months […] 6 months to 1 year […]
64
1 to 3 years […] 3 to 6 years […] 6 to 10 years […] Above 10 years […]
SECTION TWO Factors influencing branding soft drink products at the Company:
Tick () in the appropriate box besides each statement
SN Items
Ext
rem
ely
agre
e
Agr
ee
Nei
ther
Dis
agre
e
Ext
rem
ely
disa
gree
2.1 I prefer buying soft drink product whose bottle is well identified using name, sign, label or symbol.
2.2 I’m interested buying soft drink product whose bottle is well differentiated from others using names, sign, label or symbol.
2.3 I normally draw attention on the name, sign, label or symbol on the bottle when buying soft drinks
2.4 I would prefer buying soft drink that is easily recognized by name, sign, label or symbol on the bottle
SECTION THREE Brand strengths of soft drinks manufactured by Seven Up Bottling Company:
Tick () in the appropriate box besides each statement 3.1. Brand strength of the 7Up
SN Items
Ext
rem
ely
agre
e
Agr
ee
Nei
ther
Dis
agre
e
Ext
rem
ely
dis
agre
e
3.1.1 7Up is the most admired soft drink when buying soft drinks manufactured by Seven Up Bottling Company
3.1.2 7Up is my favorite soft drink among soft drinks manufactured by Seven Up Bottling Company
65
3.1.3 I perceive 7UP the highly quality soft drink manufactured by Seven Up Bottling Company
3.1.4 The values in my mind about 7Up brand convinces buying 7UP
3.2. Brand strength of the Mirinda
SN Items
Ext
rem
ely
agre
e
Agr
ee
Nei
ther
Dis
agre
e
Ext
rem
ely
disa
gree
3.2.1 Mirinda is the most admired soft drink when buying soft drinks manufactured by Seven Up Bottling Company
3.2.2 Mirinda is my favorite soft drink among soft drinks manufactured by Seven Up Bottling Company
3.2.3 I perceive Mirinda the highly quality soft drink manufactured by Seven Up Bottling Company
3.2.4 The values in my mind about Mirinda brand convinces buying Mirinda
3.3. Brand strength of the Pepsi
SN Items
Ext
rem
ely
agre
e
Agr
ee
Nei
ther
Dis
agre
e
Ext
rem
ely
dis
agre
e
3.3.1 Pespi is the most admired soft drink when buying soft drinks manufactured by Seven Up Bottling Company
3.3.2 Pespi is my favorite soft drink among soft drinks manufactured by Seven Up Bottling Company
3.3.3 I perceive Pepsi the highly quality soft drink manufactured by Seven Up Bottling Company
3.3.4 The values in my mind about Pespi brand convinces buying Pespi
66
3.4. Brand strength of the Mountain Dew
SN Items E
xtre
mel
y ag
ree
Agr
ee
Nei
ther
Dis
agre
e
Ext
rem
ely
dis
agre
e
3.4.1 Mountain Dew is the most admired soft drink when buying soft drinks manufactured by Seven Up Bottling Company
3.4.2 Mountain Dew is my favorite soft drink among soft drinks manufactured by Seven Up Bottling Company
3.4.3 I perceive Mountain Dew the highly quality soft drink manufactured by Seven Up Bottling Company
3.4.4 The values in my mind about Mountain Dew brand convinces buying Mountain Dew
SECTION FOUR Influence of brand awareness on the sales performance of soft drink products at
Seven Up Bottling Company: Tick () in the appropriate box besides each statement
67
SN Statements
Ext
rem
ely
agre
e
Agr
ee
Nei
ther
Dis
agre
e
Ext
rem
ely di
sagr
ee
4.1 Usually I would buy a soft drink whose brand name is easily recognized
4.2 A soft drink whose brand name is easy to recall is the one I used to buy most
4.3 Brand name is very important factor I consider when buying soft drink
4.4 Usually a soft drink whose brand name comes first in my mind is the one I would buy most
SECTION FIVE Influence of brand association on the sales performance of soft drink products
at Seven Up Bottling Company: Tick () in the appropriate box besides each statement
SN Statements
Ext
rem
ely
agr
ee
Agr
ee
Nei
ther
Dis
agre
e
Ext
rem
ely
di
sagr
ee
5.1 Normally experience with the features of brand guide my choice of particular soft drink
5.2 Benefits expected from certain soft drink would make buying of particular soft drink
5.3 Positive information about the brand name of soft drink constitute my choice of soft drink to buy
5.4 Ideas I have about the brand name would always constitute my purchase of a soft drink
68
SECTION SIX Sales performance of soft drink products of Seven Up Bottling Company:
Tick () in the appropriate box besides each statement 6.1. What is your experience regarding the frequency of buying/selling soft drinks products manufactured by SBC? Very high […] High […] Low […] Very low […] 6.2. What is your opinion regarding the influence of brand awareness among customers on the frequency of buying particular soft drinks products? Very high […] High […] Low […] Very low […] 6.3. What is your opinion regarding the influence of brand association (experience with brand features) on the frequency of buying particular soft drinks? Very high […] High […] Low […] Very low […]
…………………………. THE END …………………………