AUTHOR QUERY SHEET Author(s): T. BO, M. CAMMARATA, A. CANDIOTTO, S. FENOGLIO, M. J. LÓPEZ- RODRÍGUEZ, J. M. TIERNO DE FIGUEROA, & GIORGIO MALACARNE Article Title: Feeding habits of Padogobius bonelli (Bonaparte, 1846) (Osteichthyes, Gobiidae): the importance of fish dimensions and hydrological conditions Article No.: TIZO 478238 Dear Author, Please address all the numbered queries on this page which are clearly identified on the proof for your convenience. Thank you for your cooperation. Ref. no: Query Remarks Q1 what does ‘N.T.’ mean?
Transcript
AUTHOR QUERY SHEET
Author(s): T. BO, M. CAMMARATA, A. CANDIOTTO, S. FENOGLIO, M. J. LÓPEZ-RODRÍGUEZ, J. M. TIERNO DE FIGUEROA, & GIORGIO MALACARNEArticle Title: Feeding habits of Padogobius bonelli (Bonaparte, 1846) (Osteichthyes, Gobiidae): the importance of fish dimensions and hydrological conditionsArticle No.: TIZO 478238
Dear Author,
Please address all the numbered queries on this page which are clearly identified on the proof for yourconvenience.
Italian Journal of Zoology, Xxxxx 2010; 00(0): 1–8
TIZOFeeding habits of Padogobius bonelli (Bonaparte, 1846) (Osteichthyes, Gobiidae): the importance of fish dimensions and hydrological conditions
Feeding habits of Padogobius bonelliT. BO1*, M. CAMMARATA1, A. CANDIOTTO2, S. FENOGLIO1, M. J. LÓPEZ-RODRÍGUEZ1, J. M. TIERNO DE FIGUEROA3, & GIORGIO MALACARNE1
1Dipartimento di Scienze dell’Ambiente e della Vita, Università del Piemonte Orientale, Alessandria, Italy, 2Ufficio Tutela Fauna Ittica, Provincia di Alessandria, Alessandria, Italy, and 3Departamento de Biología Animal, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain
(Received 2 November 2009; accepted 7 March 2010)
AbstractThe feeding habits of Padogobius bonelli (Bonaparte, 1846) were studied in two sites in the Orba stream (NW Italy), charac-terised by natural or altered flow conditions. The species fed mainly on aquatic insects, positively selecting Chironomidae,Simuliidae, Hydroptilidae and negatively Baetidae and other taxa. We hypothesised that size, mobility and handling timewere on the basis of the detected feeding preferences, more than prey abundance in the substratum. When studying the var-iation of the diet with size, we detected that trophic spectrum of the species increases with fish dimensions. Comparing thepopulations of the two sites, we detected some interesting differences: fish from the natural flow site were generally largerand presented a broader trophic spectrum than fish from the altered flow site. Our study supports the hypothesis that fluc-tuating water levels may have evident impacts at different biotic scales, from biodiversity reductions to diet alterations.
As stated by Monakov (2003), there is no disciplinein hydrobiology that does not require elements com-ing from the study of the feeding and nutrition ofaquatic animals. In fact, understanding feedingrelationships and characterising trophic positions isfundamental to better understand basic and appliedelements of stream ecology. In the last few years,there has been a growing interest in the trophic ecol-ogy of aquatic organisms of Italian freshwater ecosys-tems, such as insects (e.g. Bo et al. 2007; Fenoglioet al. 2009), macrocrustaceans (e.g. Scalici &Gibertini 2007) and fishes (e.g. Balestrieri et al.2006; Cammarata et al. 2008; Fochetti et al.2008).
The family Gobiidae (Osteichthyes: Perciformes)is represented in the Italian inland waters by fivespecies that show different geographical distributionand ecological habits. Padogobius bonelli (Bonaparte,
1846), earlier known under the name Padogobiusmartensi (Günther, 1861), is distributed in thenorthern Adriatic basin, from Vomano (Italy) toKrka drainages (Croatia) and in the subalpine lakesin Po drainages (Kottelat & Freyhof 2007). Thisspecies has been introduced in most of western andcentral Italy (Kottelat & Freyhof 2007). This fishinhabits exclusively in freshwater, in a wide varietyof stream, river and lake habitats with coarse sub-strata (Kottelat & Freyhof 2007). This little Gobiidaespecies reaches a mean length of 6–7 cm (exception-ally 9–10 cm) and has benthic habits during its juve-nile and adult life (Zerunian 2002). The breedingseason usually goes from the beginning of May toearly July (Gandolfi et al. 1991). This species showshigh territorial habits in both sexes: individualsdefend little areas in the riverbed, with an evidentpreference for large cobbles and boulders located infast flowing waters (Lugli et al. 1992). It is well known
*Correspondence: T. Bo, Dipartimento di Scienze dell’Ambiente e della Vita, Università del Piemonte Orientale, Via T. Michel 11, Alessandria 15121, Italy.Tel: +39 0131 360231. Fax: +39 0131 360243. Email: [email protected]
that erosive environments are the most colonised areasin the riverbed (Downes et al. 1998; Fenoglio & Bo2009): in these microhabitats, P. bonelli takes advant-age of high amounts of invertebrate preys and highlevels of dissolved oxygen (Gandolfi & Tongiorgi1974). Usually the dimensions of the territory areproportional to the size of the specimens and manystudies underlined the strong aggressive behaviour ofthis species (Bisazza et al. 1989). Like other Gobii-dae, this species also shows acoustic communicationmechanisms, which are particularly important in ter-ritorial and mating behaviours (Torricelli et al.1987, 1990). The studies on feeding habits of theGobiidae started with estuarine and marine speciesand only in recent years have freshwater speciesbeen investigated (Miller 2003). Generally, Gobii-dae are considered to be benthic feeders, with a dietdominated by crustaceans and molluscs (Charleboiset al. 1997). It is well known that some Gobiidaespecies are scarcely selective feeders, ingestingamounts of sediments and associated organisms(Carle & Hastings 1982), while many others showevident trophic preferences. For example, Adámeket al. (2007), comparing the diet of four speciesfrom South Slovakia, reported that there are somedifferences among them, and also that Amphipoda,Diptera Chironomidae, Trichoptera Hydropsyche sp.and two Ephemeroptera species nymphs (Ephoronvirgo, Potamanthus luteus) always represented themost important food items. Amphipoda constitutedthe most important food item in another Gobiidae,Neogobius gymnotrachelus, that also showed a markedpreference for Chironomidae and, to a lesser extent,for Diptera Ceratopogonidae, Anellida Oligochaeta,adult Diptera and Copepoda (Grabowska &Grabowski 2005).
Padogobius bonelli is generally considered a benthicpredator, feeding on stream invertebrates and fisheggs, but little information is available about its diet.The aim of our study was to analyse the diet ofP. bonelli in an Apenninic lotic system, investigatingthe existence of feeding preference patterns and varia-tions in relation to the size. We also hypothesised thathydrological conditions may have some influence onthe fish diet. In fact, interestingly, the studied popula-tion inhabits a river reach affected by a small hydroe-lectrical plant. It is well known that reduced or alteredflows, and in general fluctuating water levels, canhave strong effects on lotic biota (Allan & Castillo2007), such as habitat reduction (Dewson et al.2007), functional ecosystem alterations (Young et al.2008) and decrease of biological richness and diver-sity (Fenoglio et al. 2007), but few data are availableabout their effects on trophic ecology of freshwaterfish.
Material and methods
The study area was a reach of the Orba stream (NWItaly), near Molare (Alessandria district). Sampleswere realised in two sites:
• Site 1: Marciazza (44°35’13.36” N; 8°36’41.79”E 264 m a.s.l.);
• Site 2: Cerreto (44°35’56.60” N; 8°36’10.81 E216 m a.s.l.).
Only 3020 m separate the two stations, but theyshow very different hydrologic conditions. Site 1 hasa natural flow, depending on natural precipitations,while Site 2 experiences high and unpredictablewater level variations, because it receives tailwaterfrom a small hydroelectric plant: in this section, flowcan augment or diminish in an unpredictable way,with changes that are in the range of 1–2 m3/s in afew minutes. Streambed width varies rapidly (with a30% increase in a few minutes) and water currentshows unpredictable variations, ranging from 0.2 to0.9 m/s. Some physicochemical parameters weremeasured in both sites at the end of each samplingperiod; two ecotoxicological tests were alsoperformed (Table I). The fish community is charac-terised by the presence of few species, such as Bar-bus plebejus (Bonaparte, 1839), Squalius cephalus(Linnaeus, 1758), Alburnus alburnus alborella (DeFilippi, 1844), and in depositional areas Cobitis taeniaLinnaeus 1758.
Gobies were caught by using a Scubla IG200/2electro-fishing device. In total, 120 specimens ofPadogobius bonelli were collected: in two dates (5October 2007 and 3 July 2008) 30 gobies were cap-tured in each site (30 specimens/station/two dates).Each goby was measured (total length) with an accu-racy of 1.0 mm. Digestive tracts were removed,stored in 90% ethanol and brought to the laboratory.
Table I. Main chemical and ecotoxicological parameters of thetwo studied sites.
Gut contents were analysed with a Nikon SMZ1500 light microscope (60–100×) coupled with aJVC TK-C701EG videocamera. Identification ofprey was based on sclerotised body parts, particu-larly head capsules, mouthparts and leg fragments.Organisms in guts were classified generally to genusor family level. Stewart and Stark (2002) stated thatthe count of sclerotised fragments (i.e. head capsulesor legs) can give a reasonably accurate count of preyconsumed. Gut contents were also compared withthe natural composition and abundance of macroin-vertebrate communities. In fact, using a Surber net(20×20 cm; mesh 255 μm), 145 samples were col-lected in the same period in the two sites to assess thepresence and abundance of the taxa of the naturalbenthic invertebrate population (n = 67 Surber sam-ples in Site 1, 33 in October and 34 in July; and n =78 in Site 2, 38 in October and 40 in July). Sampleswere preserved in 90% ethanol. In the laboratory, allorganisms were counted and identified to genus orspecies level, except for Oligochaeta and earlyinstars of some Trichoptera and Diptera, whichwere identified to family or sub-family level.
To investigate the existence of feeding prefer-ences, we compared gut contents with natural com-position and abundance of macroinvertebratecommunity in the riverbed using the trophic electiv-ity index of Ivlev (1961):
where ri = relative abundance of a particular taxonin the diet and pi = relative abundance of the sametaxon in the benthic community. The formula con-siders the number of taxa (i) found in the diet. Theindex ranges from −1 to 1. A value of −1 means totalavoidance, 1 indicates preference and 0 indicatesindifference.
For statistical analysis, STATISTICA software(StatSoft, 2005) was employed. Normality of thevariables was assessed by means of a Kolmogorov–Smirnov test and, because variables studied werenot normally distributed, non-parametric statisticswere used in all cases. Thus, for assessing if therewas a correlation between fish size and the numberof prey items, between fish size and the number oftaxa ingested, and between fish size and number ofindividuals of each taxonomic group of prey, aGamma correlation test was used, which is the bestchoice when data present a high degree of rangeoverlapping (Guisande González et al. 2006). Toevaluate whether significant differences existedbetween sites in fish total body length, number of
prey eaten, and number of taxa eaten, a Mann–Whitney test was employed.
Results
A list of macroinvertebrate taxa totally collected ateach site is reported in Table II. All analysed indi-viduals, except one from Site 2, presented some kindof gut content. Padogobius bonelli in the studied sitesfed mainly on macroinvertebrates, particularlyaquatic insects (Table III). Coarse and fine particu-late organic matter, algae, vegetal matter, and sandwere found only punctually in the guts, and theywere probably ingested incidentally or came fromthe prey guts. The only non-macroinvertebrate preywidely consumed were Crustacea Daphnia spp.,especially by the Site 2 population. The mostimportant macroinvertebrate prey in the guts werelarvae of Diptera Chironomidae: they constituted46.0% of the total ingested items in the populationfrom Site 1 and 30.4% in the Site 2 population, andthey were present in almost all guts. Other import-ant prey were, in order of abundance, TrichopteraHydroptilidae, Trichoptera Hydropsychidae, andEphemeroptera Baetidae (particularly Baetis sp.) inSite 1 and Trichoptera Hydroptilidae in Site 2.Unusual components of the gut contents were ter-restrial insects and two fish scales, the latter prob-ably ingested incidentally when feeding on othertrophic resources. When comparing the macroinver-tebrate community composition of the riverbed withthe ingested prey by means of the Ivlev’s index(Figure 1), we observed in the Site 1 population aclear preference for Trichoptera Rhyacophilidae,Hydroptilidae and Psychomidae and Diptera Chirono-midae, while some other taxa, such as Hydracarina,Baetis sp., Habroleptoides sp. and some Coleoptera andDiptera, also abundant in the riverbed, were consumedin smaller amounts. In the Site 2 population, Trichop-tera Hydroptilidae, and Diptera Tipulidae andEmpididae were preferred, while Hydracarina, indeter-minate Diptera and Plecoptera Leuctridae (particularlyLeuctra sp.) were less consumed, although some ofthem were common in the substratum.
Regarding the influence of the size in the diet ofthis species, we noticed that some prey tend to bemore common in the gut of bigger specimens. Thiswas the case in Site 1 of Ephemeroptera Baetis sp.,Trichoptera Hydroptilidae (Gamma correlation =0.47 and 0.44, respectively, p < 0.05). In Site 2there was a positive correlation between size and thenumber of Ephemeroptera Baetis sp., TrichopteraPhilopotamidae, Hydropsichidae and Hydroptilidae,and Diptera Limoniidae and Tanypodinae (Gamma
In Site 1, there was positive correlation betweenthe size of the individuals and the number of taxa
eaten (Gamma correlation = 0.37, p < 0.05), butnot with the number of prey (Gamma correlation =0.15, p > 0.05). In Site 2, there was a very slightnegative correlation between size and number of
Table II. Number of items, percent relative abundance in the gut, and mean values for macroinvertebrates found in the gut of the twoPadogobius bonelli populations.
prey eaten (Gamma correlation = –0.19, p < 0.05),but not with the number of taxa eaten (Gamma cor-relation = 0.19, p > 0.05).
Comparing the two populations, there were differ-ences in body size between sites (Mann–Whitney U= 1357.5, p < 0.05). Mean total body length in Site
1 was 49.15 mm ± 0.65 SD, while in Site 2 it was46.15 mm ± 0.59 SD. Thus, fishes from Site 2 weresmaller than those from Site 1, where the flow is nat-ural, not unpredictably variable. Comparing diets,there were no differences in number of prey eaten byindividuals from each population (Mann–Whitney
Table III. Number of items, percent relative abundance in the gut, and mean values for macroinvertebrates found in the gut of the twoPadogobius bonelli populations.
U = 1438.0, p > 0.05). Nevertheless, there were dif-ferences in the number of taxa eaten by individualsfrom each population (Mann–Whitney U = 1371.5,p < 0.05), being higher in Site 1 (Figure 2).
Discussion
In field studies, gut content analyses are the mostdiffused method to investigate prey choice and dietin lotic organisms (Allan & Castillo 2007). The ana-lysis of the gut contents of Padogobius bonelli showsthat, in the studied area, this species feeds mainly onaquatic insects, while Mollusca, Crustacea and otheritems are only present in their guts occasionally,
contrary to findings in some other species of fresh-water Gobiidae (e.g. Charlebois et al. 1997). Ana-lysing diet preferences, we can assume that P. bonellifeed mainly on insects selected on the basis of somecharacteristics: preferred items are generallymedium or large-sized, scarcely mobile, closely asso-ciated with the riverbed, generally soft-bodied andwithout hard exoskeleton, spines or some other mor-phological defences, such as Trichoptera Rhy-acophilidae, Hydroptilidae and Polycentropodidae,and Diptera Chironomidae, Limoniidae and Tipuli-dae. This result agrees with the ‘Optimal foragingtheory’ (Krebs 1978), that states that predatorsinclude in the diet the most profitable preys on the
Figure 1. Ivlev’s electivity index for macroinvertebrate taxa in the Padogobius bonelli diet in the two stations of Orba creek.
285
290
295
300
305
Feeding habits of Padogobius bonelli 7
basis of different elements, such as energy contents(i.e. size), encounter rate, prey density, handlingtime and others. For this reason, other invertebrates,also abundant and widespread, were not positivelyselected: this is the case of the very mobileEphemeroptera Baetidae and Leptophlebiidae andalso of the small-sized Hydracarina. The small per-centages of coarse and fine particulate organic mat-ter in the guts, together with a lower percentage ofsand and gravel, are probably a consequence of thefeeding method of this species that collects its preysdirectly from the riverbed, as some other Gobiidaespecies (Carle & Hastings 1982; Charlebois et al.1997).
The strong preference for benthic preys probablydiminishes interspecific competition with the BrownTrout (Salmo trutta trutta L., 1758), a Salmonidaethat usually lives in the same lotic environments, butthat captures preys in the whole water column,ingesting high amounts of drifting and terrestrialinsects (Montori et al. 2006; Fochetti et al. 2008).
In this study, a general increase of trophic spec-trum was detected in larger fishes: bigger goby spec-imens ingested larger number of taxa. Probably,with the increase in length, there is an associatedincrease in the ability to handle and devour differenttaxa.
Comparing the two nearby located populations ofP. bonelli, we detected some interesting differences:fishes from Site 1 were generally larger and ingestedmore taxa than fishes from Site 2. No significant dif-ferences were detected in the chemical characteris-tics and in the macrobenthic communities betweenthe two sites, so we could hypothesise that differences
in flow could be on the basis of the observed differ-ences. In fact, fluctuating water levels may inhibitmovements, habitat exploration and prey encountersin the downstream site: rapid changes in currentvelocity and riverbed area may have a strong impacton diet composition and subsequently on develop-ment and final size of gobies. Improvements of theautoecological knowledge, for example by means ofdiet analysis, could be very important for the protec-tion of this species that recently seems to be vulnera-ble (Miller 2003).
Acknowledgements
We thank E. Coduti, M. Grenna, and F. Gallo fortheir help with field work. The final version of themanuscript benefited greatly from the insight pro-vided by G.B. Delmastro and three anonymousreviewers. This work was supported by Provincia diAlessandria ATF Grants.
References
Adámek Z, Andrei J, Gallardo JM. 2007. Food habits of four bot-tom-dwelling Gobiid species at the confluence of the Danubeand Hron rivers (South Slovakia). International Review ofHydrobiology 92:554–563.
Allan JD, Castillo MM. 2007. Stream ecology. Structure andfunction of running waters. 2nd ed. Dordrecht: SpringerEditions.
Balestrieri A, Prigioni C, Remonti L, Sgrosso S, Giuseppe P.2006. Feeding ecology of Leuciscus cephalus and Rutilus rubilioin southern Italy. Italian Journal of Zoology 73:129–135.
Bisazza A, Marconato A, Marin G. 1989. Male competition andfemale choice in Padogobius martensi (Pisces, Gobiidae). Ani-mal Behaviour 38:406–413.
Bo T, Fenoglio S, Malacarne G. 2007. Diet of Dinocras cephalotesand Perla marginata (Plecoptera: Perlidae) in an Apenninestream (northwestern Italy). Canadian Entomologist139:358–364.
Cammarata M, Bo T, Candiotto A, Pessino M, Fenoglio S,Malacarne G. 2008. Analisi preliminare della dieta del barboeuropeo (Barbus barbus) nel Fiume Bormida. Memorie dellaSocietà Italiana di Scienze Naturali e del Museo Civico di Sto-ria Naturale di Milano 36:48.
Carle KJ, Hastings PA. 1982. Selection of meiofaunal prey by theDarter Goby, Gobionellus boleosoma (Gobiidae). Estuaries5:316–318.
Charlebois PM, Marsden JE, Goettel RG, Wolfe RK, Jude DJ,Rudnicka S. 1997. The round goby, Neogobius melanostomus(Pallas), a review of European and North American literature.Zion, IL: Illinois Natural History Survey Press.
Dewson ZS, James ABW, Death RG. 2007. Invertebrateresponses to short-term water abstraction in small New Zea-land streams. Freshwater Biology 52:357–369.
Downes BJ, Lake PS, Schreiber ESG, Glaister A. 1998. Habitatstructure and regulation of local species diversity in a stony,upland stream. Ecological Monograph 68:237–257.
Fenoglio S, Bo T. 2009. Lineamenti di Ecologia Fluviale.Novara: Città Studi-DeAgostini scuola.
Figure 2. Number of macroinvertebrate taxa in the diet of thetwo studied populations.
310
315
320
325
330
335
340
345
350
355
360
365
370
375
380
385
390
395
8 T. Bo et al.
Fenoglio S, Bo T, Cucco M, Malacarne G. 2007. Response of ben-thic invertebrate assemblages to varying drought conditions inthe Po river (NW Italy). Italian Journal of Zoology 74:191–201.
Fenoglio S, Bo T, López-Rodríguez MJ, Tierno de Figueroa JM,Malacarne G. 2009. Preimaginal feeding habits of Isoperla car-bonaria Aubert, 1953 (Plecoptera: Perlodidae). AquaticInsects 31:401–407.
Fochetti R, Argano R, Tierno de Figueroa JM. 2008. Feedingecology of various age-classes of brown trout in River Nera,Central Italy. Belgian Journal of Zoology 138:128–131.
Gandolfi G, Tongiorgi P. 1974. Taxonomic position, distributionand biology of the gobies present in the Italian fresh-waters,Padogobius martensi (Günther) and Gobius niigricans Canestrini(Osteichthyes, Gobiidae). Annali del Museo Civico di StoriaNaturale di Genova 80:92–118.
Gandolfi G, Zerunian S, Torricelli P, Marconato A. 1991. I pescidelle acque interne italiane. Roma: Istituto Poligrafico e Zeccadello Stato.
Grabowska J, Grabowski M. 2005. Diel-feeding activity in earlysummer of racer goby Neogobius gymnotrachelus (Gobiidae): Anew invader in the Baltic basin. Journal of Applied Ichthyol-ogy 21:282–286.
Guisande González C, Barreiro Felpeto A, Maneiro Estraviz I,Riveiro Alarcón I, Vergara Castaño AR, Vaamonde Liste A.2006. Tratamiento de datos. Madrid: Ediciones Díaz de Santos.
Ivlev VS. 1961. Experimental ecology of the feeding of fishes.New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Kottelat M, Freyhof J. 2007. Handbook of European freshwaterfishes. Cornol: Publications Kottelat.
Krebs JR. 1978. Behavioural ecology: An evolutionary approach.Optimal foraging: Decision rules for predators. Oxford: Black-well. pp 23–63.
Lugli M, Bobbio L, Torricelli P, Gandolfi G. 1992. Breeding ecol-ogy and male spawning success in two hill-stream populations
of the freshwater goby, Padogobius martensi. EnvironmentalBiology of Fishes 35:37–48.
Miller PJ. 2003. The freshwater fishes of Europe. Vol.8/I. Mugili-dae, Atherinidae, Atherinopsidae, Bleniidae, Odontobutidae,Gobiidae 1. Wiebelsheim: Aula Verlag GmBH.
Monakov AK. 2003. Feeding of freshwater invertebrates. Ghent:Kenobi Productions.
Montori A, Tierno de Figueroa JM, Santos X. 2006. The diet ofthe brown trout Salmo trutta (L.) during the reproductiveperiod: Size-related and sexual effects. International Review ofHydrobiology 91:438–450.
Scalici M, Gibertini G. 2007. Feeding habits of the crayfish Aus-tropotamobius pallipes (Decapoda, Astacidae) in a brook in Lat-ium (central Italy). Italian Journal of Zoology 74:157–168.
StatSoft Inc. 2005. STATISTICA (data analysis software sys-tem), version 7.1 (www.statsoft.com).
Stewart KW, Stark BP. 2002. Nymphs of North American stone-fly genera (Plecoptera). Columbus: The Caddis Press.
Torricelli P, Lugli M, Pavan G. 1990. Analysis of sounds pro-duced by male Padogobius martensi (Pisces, Gobiidae) andfactors affecting their structural properties. Bioacoustics2:261–275.
Torricelli P, Pavan G, Lugli M. 1987. Analisi di suoni aggressivi edi corteggiamento nei maschi del ghiozzo di fiume Padogobiusmartensi. Bollettino Accademia Gioenia di Scienze Naturali20:263–265.
Young RG, Matthaei CD, Townsend CR. 2008. Organic matterbreakdown and ecosystem metabolism: functional indicatorsfor assessing river ecosystem health Journal of the NorthAmerican Benthological Society 27:605–625.
Zerunian S. 2002. Condannati all’estinzione? Biodiversità,biologia, minacce e strategie di conservazione dei pescid’acqua dolce indigeni in Italia. Bologna: Il Sole 24 OreEd. Agricole.
