+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Increasing Iron Concentrations in UK Upland Waters

Increasing Iron Concentrations in UK Upland Waters

Date post: 26-Nov-2023
Category:
Upload: independent
View: 0 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
26
ORIGINAL PAPER Increasing Iron Concentrations in UK Upland Waters C. Neal S. Lofts C. D. Evans B. Reynolds E. Tipping M. Neal Received: 12 December 2007 / Accepted: 17 June 2008 / Published online: 15 July 2008 Ó Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008 Abstract Iron distributions in rainfall, streams, soils and groundwaters are described for the Upper River Severn catchment of mid-Wales. Iron is mainly supplied from within- catchment sources with highest concentrations occurring under reducing conditions. Iron concentrations have doubled over the past 20 years (*5.0 lg yr -1 for the forest and *3.7 lg yr -1 for the moorland). For the forested sites, the gradients are particularly high post- 1993. UK rivers/lakes monitored by the UK Acid Waters Monitoring Network show similar increases. Generally, Fe correlates with dissolved organic carbon (DOC). The greatest rates of Fe increase coincide with those for DOC. Thermodynamic modelling using WHAM/Model VI indicates that Fe(III) is mainly in microparticulate form (probably oxyhydroxides) apart from under reducing conditions. It is proposed that Fe increases for surface waters are associated with increased microparticulate Fe(III) due to stabilisation against aggregation by binding of DOM to its surface. The results relate to acidification declines and deforestation leading to land disturbance and wetter conditions within the soil. There will be greater acidification reversal following tree harvesting due to lowering of atmospheric SO x scavenging and this may have resulted in the greater increase in Fe in the later years of the study. Keywords Iron River Acidification Colloids/nanoparticles DOC WHAM C. Neal (&) M. Neal Centre for Ecology and Hydrology Wallingford, Crowmarsh Gifford, Wallingford, Oxon OX10 8BB, UK e-mail: [email protected] S. Lofts E. Tipping Centre for Ecology and Hydrology Lancaster, Lancaster Environment Centre, Library Avenue, Bailrigg, Lancaster LA1 4AP, UK C. D. Evans B. Reynolds Centre for Ecology and Hydrology Bangor, Orton Building, Deiniol Road, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2UP, UK 123 Aquat Geochem (2008) 14:263–288 DOI 10.1007/s10498-008-9036-1
Transcript

ORI GIN AL PA PER

Increasing Iron Concentrations in UK Upland Waters

C. Neal Æ S. Lofts Æ C. D. Evans Æ B. Reynolds Æ E. Tipping Æ M. Neal

Received: 12 December 2007 / Accepted: 17 June 2008 / Published online: 15 July 2008� Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Abstract Iron distributions in rainfall, streams, soils and groundwaters are described for

the Upper River Severn catchment of mid-Wales. Iron is mainly supplied from within-

catchment sources with highest concentrations occurring under reducing conditions. Iron

concentrations have doubled over the past 20 years (*5.0 lg yr-1 for the forest and *3.7

lg yr-1 for the moorland). For the forested sites, the gradients are particularly high post-

1993. UK rivers/lakes monitored by the UK Acid Waters Monitoring Network show

similar increases. Generally, Fe correlates with dissolved organic carbon (DOC). The

greatest rates of Fe increase coincide with those for DOC. Thermodynamic modelling

using WHAM/Model VI indicates that Fe(III) is mainly in microparticulate form (probably

oxyhydroxides) apart from under reducing conditions. It is proposed that Fe increases for

surface waters are associated with increased microparticulate Fe(III) due to stabilisation

against aggregation by binding of DOM to its surface. The results relate to acidification

declines and deforestation leading to land disturbance and wetter conditions within the soil.

There will be greater acidification reversal following tree harvesting due to lowering of

atmospheric SOx scavenging and this may have resulted in the greater increase in Fe in the

later years of the study.

Keywords Iron � River � Acidification � Colloids/nanoparticles � DOC � WHAM

C. Neal (&) � M. NealCentre for Ecology and HydrologyWallingford, Crowmarsh Gifford, Wallingford, Oxon OX10 8BB, UKe-mail: [email protected]

S. Lofts � E. TippingCentre for Ecology and Hydrology Lancaster, Lancaster Environment Centre,Library Avenue, Bailrigg, Lancaster LA1 4AP, UK

C. D. Evans � B. ReynoldsCentre for Ecology and Hydrology Bangor, Orton Building,Deiniol Road, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2UP, UK

123

Aquat Geochem (2008) 14:263–288DOI 10.1007/s10498-008-9036-1

1 Introduction

The UK uplands provide headwaters of many major British rivers and they are a major

source of potable, industrial and agricultural water supplies (Hudson et al. 1997). These

uplands often constitute areas of outstanding natural beauty and they are of high amenity/

ecological status. However, they are ecologically threatened due to pollutant inputs

especially from ‘acid rain’, including sulphur and nitrogen compounds (CLAG 1995;

Hornung et al. 1995). In addition to acidification, there are issues of land use change that

has affected water quality. In particular, in the early to mid parts of the twentieth century

conifer plantations were extensively introduced onto acidic and acid sensitive upland

moorland. Now many of the plantations have reached maturity, widespread felling is

affecting water quality (Hudson et al. 1997; Neal et al. 2004). The main focus on upland

water quality has been on those components directly linked to acidification and forestry

rotation cycles such as pH, inorganic aluminium and strong acid anions (chloride, sulphate

and nitrate). There has been less emphasis on the behaviour of other elements such as iron

(Fe) that have not been directly associated with previously known upland water quality

issues. Iron is a key element, being essential for all organisms and yet limiting in certain

environments such as the open ocean (Turner et al. 2001). Understanding the biogeo-

chemical cycling of Fe is therefore a key research topic. There is evidence that surface

water iron concentrations may be significant on an international scale. For example, in the

FOREGS Geochemical Atlas of Europe (Salminen et al. 2005) 31% of measurements of

filterable (\0.45 lm) Fe in surface waters exceed the mandatory EU drinking water limit

of 200 lg l-1. In the UK, studies have shown that iron can be high in upland waters,

especially those that are acidic and organic rich (e.g. Abesser et al. 2006).

Iron is the second most abundant metal in the crust after aluminium (Greenwood and

Earnshaw, 2005). Despite this, Fe concentrations are relatively low in surface waters

(typically lg l-1 to mg l-1 levels) with the ratio of its concentration in river water and

seawater to that in the crust being around three orders of magnitude lower than ions such as

sodium and chloride and two orders of magnitude lower than transition metals such as

copper, nickel and zinc (Neal 2000). Iron is predominant in solution and in mineral forms

in oxidation states of Fe(II) (Fe2+) and Fe(III) (Fe3+). Fe(II) occurs under reducing con-

ditions encountered in some groundwaters and soils, while Fe(III) predominates in more

oxygenated conditions such as most surface waters. The low solubility of Fe is associated

with the ease of hydrolysis and the formation of insoluble (weathering) components such as

oxides/hydroxides and clay minerals, and under reducing conditions with sulphate

reduction, Fe sulphides can also precipitate (Appelo and Postma, 1999; Drever 1997). In

general, Fe solubility increases as pH decreases as well as when the waters become more

reducing and Fe2+ predominates. For surface waters, Fe is primarily as Fe(III) and in this

oxidation state Fe readily binds to ligands, particularly natural organic matter, and also

hydrolyses to form solid oxyhydroxides that may be encountered at sizes below the pore

sizes of conventional filters (0.1–1 lm). Additionally, Fe(III) oxyhydroxides may them-

selves bind natural organic matter at their surfaces (e.g. Tipping 1981, Filius et al. 2000), a

phenomenon that contributes to their colloidal stability in waters.

Recently, Lofts et al. (2008) have shown that the amount of Fe(III) bound to inorganic

and organic ligands in waters (the ‘‘truly dissolved’’ Fe(III)) can be estimated by assuming

oxyhydroxide control of the Fe3+ ion activity. This allows the distribution of Fe(III)

between ‘‘truly dissolved’’ and oxyhydroxide forms to be estimated. Application of such

knowledge to the field can help develop understanding of the processes controlling Fe

concentrations and transport from soil to waters. Currently, widespread and significant

264 Aquat Geochem (2008) 14:263–288

123

increases in dissolved (filterable) organic carbon concentrations are being observed in

temperate surface waters across Europe and North America probably in relation to the

reversal of anthropogenic acidification (Evans et al. 2006; Monteith et al. 2007). In the

context of such widespread change and our improving understanding of Fe(III) speciation,

it is timely to examine concentrations of iron in surface waters, and their temporal trends.

Here, ‘‘dissolved’’ (\0.45 micron filtered fraction) Fe concentrations are described for

rainfall, cloud water, soil water, stream water and groundwater at the Plynlimon experi-

mental catchments in the upper river Severn, mid-Wales, where there have been extensive

hydrological and water quality studies over the past 30 years (Neal 1997). The catchments

cover acidic and acid sensitive moorland and forest typologies characteristic of much of the

British uplands, and the work is of relevance to environmental science and environmental

management issues for the uplands in general. The issues include: Do changes in pH affect

Fe mobilisation? How important is organic complexation given that the dissolved organic

carbon (DOC) levels have been increasing over the last two decades or more (Freeman

et al. 2001; Worrall et al. 2004; Neal et al. 2005)? Are there any systematic trends in Fe

concentrations over time in line with changing acidity, pollutant deposition and DOC

levels (Evans and Monteith 2001; Neal et al. 2001; Evans et al. 2006)? Does conifer

plantation rotation cycles affect iron mobilisation? Are Fe levels such that they may affect

potability of the important upland water resource (Buckley and Keil 1990)? These issues

are addressed here and are put in the context of UK rivers by comparisons between the

Plynlimon and other long-term studies in the acidic and acid sensitive areas of the UK (The

UK Acid Waters Monitoring Network, UKAWMN, Monteith and Evans 2000; Evans and

Monteith 2001). Given the issues of increasing DOC levels in many areas where acidifi-

cation is in decline and relatively high Fe concentrations across many parts of Europe, the

work is of relevance to much broader regions than just the UK. It is also of relevance to

contemporary issues of colloidal and nanoparticle transport, function and form.

2 Study Area and Monitoring Data

2.1 The Plynlimon Study

The headwaters of the River Severn have an upper half of hill-top acid moorland plateau,

with hag-peat and podzolic soils, and a lower half of conifer plantation, the Hafren Forest,

with podzolic and gley soils (Brandt et al. 2004). The upper Severn has two main tribu-

taries, the Afon Hafren and the Afon Hore, and a minor one, the Nant Tanllwyth, which

joins the Afon Hafren near its confluence with the Afon Hore. The bedrock consists of

Lower Palaeozoic mudstone, shale and grit. The Hafren Forest is mainly of Sitka spruce

with some Norway spruce, larch and lodgepole pine that were planted in various phases

from the mid-1940s through to the late 1960s. Felling occurred in various phases across the

catchment (Table 1).

Here, information is drawn from 1 to 25 years of rainfall, cloud water, throughfall,

stemflow and stream and ground water quality information (Table 1). The total length of

data record covered is March 1983 to the end of December 2006. Two rainfall sites cover

the altitude range for the catchment, and rainfall samples were combined for an integrated

value. There are five main stream sites: the upper and lower Hafren (117 ha per 100%-

moorland and 347 ha per 50%-moorland, respectively), the upper and lower Hore (178 ha

per 50%-moorland and 334 ha per 25%-moorland, respectively) and the lower Tanllwyth

(51 ha per 100%-forest). Several small streams, ditch waters and ground waters were also

Aquat Geochem (2008) 14:263–288 265

123

Table 1 Catchment summary information

Site Area(ha)

Soiltype

Vegetationtype

Felling Samplingper year

Startdate

Enddate

Atmospheric inputs

Rain – – – – 52 10/5/83 Cont

Cloud water – – – – 52 25/9/90 Cont

Throughfall – – – – 26 01/02/84 02/09/91

Stemflow – – – – 26 01/02/84 02/09/91

Main streams

Upper Hafren 117 M/Pe M M 52 17/07/90 Cont

Lower Hafren 347 M/P/G SS Y100a 52 10/05/83 Cont

Upper Hore 178 M/P/G SS Y100%b 52 28/08/84 Cont

Lower Hore 335 M/P/G SS Y100%c 52 10/05/83 Cont

Intermediate size stream

Tanllwyth 51 G SS Y50%d 52 17/09/91 Cont

Small streams

South2Hore 3–6 P SS Y100%e 52 19/04/88 20/02/01

SE1f 2–4 P SS Y100%f 26 20/09/94 14/02/01

SE3c 2–4 P SS N 26 11/10/94 27/04/99

Tanllwyth Nc \2 G SS N 26 28/04/94 27/04/99

Tanllwyth Sf \2 G SS Y100%d 26 28/04/94 14/02/01

Boreholes

HA4b P SS Y100%f 12/52 24/04/94 14/02/01

Quarry P SS N 12/52 24/04/94 14/02/01

SE1bf P SS Y100%f 26 10/05/95 27/04/99

SE3bc P SS N 26 10/05/95 27/04/99

TanNbc G SS N 26 05/07/94 27/04/99

TanSbf G SS Y100%d 26 09/08/94 27/04/99

US1 Pe M M 12 24/04/94 12/07/95

US2 P SS N 12 24/04/94 12/07/95

US3 P SS N 12 24/04/94 14/06/95

US4 P SS N 12 24/04/94 12/07/95

LS1 P SS N 12 24/04/94 12/07/95

LS2 P SS N 12 24/04/94 12/07/95

LS3 P SS N 12 24/04/94 12/07/95

LS4 P SS N 12 24/04/94 12/07/95

IS1 P SS N 12 24/04/94 12/07/95

IS2 P SS N 12 24/04/94 12/07/95

VB1 P/Gr M M 12 24/04/94 12/07/95

The paired sites have control and felled catchments, the site names have suffix ‘‘c’’ for the control and suffix‘‘f’’ for felled sites. SS = Sitka Spruce; M = Acid Moorland. Soil type (Soil) G = Gley; P = Podzol; Pe =Peat, Gr = Gravel. Under felling activity Y = Yes, 100% fell unless indicated otherwise; N = No fell.The superscript denote felling date: a ongoing thinning; b March 2000; c March 1985 to October 1988;d February 1996; e August–October 1989; f September–October 1995

266 Aquat Geochem (2008) 14:263–288

123

monitored across the catchment and were collected on a regular weekly to monthly basis

(Table 1). The groundwater samples represent fracture flow in the bedrock (Neal et al.

1997b).

The waters were filtered on return to the Plynlimon laboratories for rainfall, cloud water,

throughfall and stemflow. The stream and groundwater samples were filtered in the field.

Filtration was undertaken under vacuum using 0.45 lM cellulose acetate circles. The

filtered waters were stored at 4�C in the dark in acid washed polypropylene bottles and

were acidified to 1% (v/v) with high purity concentrated nitric acid to avoid sample

deterioration for the trace metals. Iron concentrations were subsequently determined using

inductively coupled plasma emission spectroscopy. The methodologies used for all the

determinands monitored are provided by Neal et al. (1997a).

There is a large background of information on soil water chemistry to be drawn from,

and it would be remiss not to deal with this information within this publication. Since some

of the findings have been published previously (Reynolds et al. 1988; Hughes et al. 1990),

here only the salient features are provided with information on the findings of the earlier

research being reported later in the paper.

Soil water was sampled from five horizons within a peaty podzol and peaty gley soil

under mature Sitka spruce in the Hafren forest and data for grassland is also available for

the adjacent River Wye catchment. Soil water was collected using tensionless lysimeters

from beneath Lf- and Oh-horizons and porous ceramic cup samplers were used in the

mineral soil horizons. Samples were collected every two weeks and filtered through 0.45

lm membrane filters prior to analysis for a range of analytes at CEH Bangor and CEH

Merlewood research stations. pH was determined on an unfiltered sample, Fe by atomic

absorption spectrophotometry and DOC by auto analyser using a UV oxidation procedure

on filtered samples. Part way through the study, felling took place for the forested site and

hence comparisons could be made pre- and post-fell.

2.2 The UK Acid Waters Monitoring Network

The UKAWMN sites cover a wide area of the UK (from the north of Scotland to the south

of England as well as Northern Ireland, Monteith and Evans 2000) and they comprise 11

rivers and 11 lakes. 17 of the catchments are mainly moorland, with five having significant

conifer cover (up to 70%). Bedrock geology varies, but is predominantly low weathering

(sandstone, grits slate, schist, extrusive volcanics and granite). The soil type and % forest

cover are shown in Table 2. Streams are sampled monthly, and lakes quarterly. Data for the

period 1988 to 2006 have been analysed for long-term trends in both Fe and DOC using the

modified Seasonal Kendall Test (Hirsch and Slack 1985). At six of the sites, Fe concen-

trations frequently fell below detection limits, which decreased in 2000 from 0.015 to

0.002 mg l-1; trends at these sites have therefore been treated with caution.

3 Results

3.1 Atmospheric Inputs, Throughfall and Stemflow

Iron concentrations in rainfall, cloud-water, stemflow and throughfall vary considerably,

especially in cloud-water (Table 3), and the highest concentrations occur when the volume

of catch is low. The lowest average concentration occurs for rainfall (14 lg l-1) with

Aquat Geochem (2008) 14:263–288 267

123

throughfall intermediate (35 lg l-1) and cloud water and stemflow highest (85 and 73 lg

l-1, respectively). There is no statistically significant trend in Fe concentration over time

for any of these waters (Table 4).

3.2 Streams

The average Fe concentration varies between 12 and 911 lg l-1 (Table 3). For the main

streams, Fe concentrations increase over time and the effects of felling activity are

indistinct against this overall pattern (Fig. 1). In the case of the forest streams, there is a

marked steeper increase in trend around 1993, and to illustrate the magnitude of the

changes occurring, the data is split between the earlier (pre-1994) and the later (post-1993)

periods and the data is then assessed using average values and linear regressions. In terms

of average, for the forested catchments, the Fe concentration increased between the two

periods typically by around 60%, with concentrations almost doubling over the full 22

years of monitoring. For example, the average Fe concentrations in 1983/1984 and 2005/

2006 for the lower Hafren are 71 and 139 lg l-1, respectively. With regard to the linear

regression (Table 4):

• For the period prior to 1994, the gradients are low, mainly statistically insignificantly

different from zero, and the correlations are weak. However, for the period post 1993,

there are statistically significant positive gradients with time for the forested

catchments averaging around 5.5 lg l-1 yr-1.

• Comparison cannot be undertaken for the earlier part of the record in the case of the

Tanllwyth and upper Hafren due to an insufficient record (only 3 years of data pre-

1993). They can however be examined for the later period as there is sufficient overlap.

The gradients occur in the sequence upper Hafren (3.73 ± 1.23 lg l-1 yr-1), lower

Table 2 Catchment types within the UKAWMN and regression of Fe with time and DOC across the sitesUKAWMN

Site name Type Forest % Soil Fe regression against DOC DOC

Time 2*std const 2*std r2 N Avg Min Maxlg mg-C-1 mg-C l-1

Allt na Coir n Con R 42 pdz 22 1 0 37 0.68 199 4.6 0.1 11.8

River Etherow R 0 p, pdz 28 2 59 129 0.584 196 6.7 0.3 34.0

Old Lodge R 30 pdz 66 6 11 307 0.423 195 6.1 0.2 45.0

Afon Gwy R 0 pdz 36 4 48 64 0.271 195 2.3 0.1 15.6

Beaghs Burn R 0 p 57 6 142 515 0.33 197 12.5 3.1 37.0

Bencrom River R 0 p 11 1 11 31 0.417 197 4.4 1.2 16.0

Coneyglen Burn R 0 p 26 8 648 581 0.054 176 8.3 1.4 26.9

Loch Coire n Arr L 0 p 19 3 -14 27 0.482 67 2.6 0.1 5.9

Loch Chon L 44 p, gl 33 4 7 44 0.526 67 3.9 1.7 7.0

Loch Tinker L 0 p 33 10 1 168 0.138 66 5.3 1.9 11.0

R L. Glenhead L 0 p 9 2 11 12 0.29 65 4.4 1.6 11.0

Loch Grannoch L 70 p 15 3 41 38 0.333 66 4.9 1.9 12.8

Llyn Cwn Mynach L 55 p 9 2 11 20 0.191 64 2.7 0.1 10.7

Blue Lough L 0 p 11 2 -9 16 0.461 56 4.0 1.4 7.3

R = river, L = lake, gl = gley, p = peat, pdz = podzol

268 Aquat Geochem (2008) 14:263–288

123

Table 3 Summary statistics for iron concentrations (lg l-1) in Plynlimon rainfall, cloud water, streamwater and groundwater

Period Average Minimum Maximum Low flow High flow

Atmospheric inputs

Rainfall 1983–2006 14 (5) 0 976 62 4

Cloud 1990–2006 85 (43) 0 2332 152 20

Stemflow 1984–1991 73 (25) 5 410 82 28

Throughfall 1984–1991 35 (53) 8 207 55 15

Main streams

Upper Hafren 1990–2005 99 (130) 4 806 50 131

1990–1993 82 (111) 15 417 33 141

1994–2006 97 (130) 4 806 65 150

Lower Hafren 1983–2005 99 (130) 17 521 66 148

1983–1993 80 (106) 23 295 52 118

1994–2006 120 (145) 17 521 92 156

Upper Hore 1984–2005 118 (110) 5 557 140 116

1984–1993 79 (83) 26 287 93 95

1994–2006 138 (132) 5 528 171 132

Lower Hore 1983–2006 91 (101) 6 497 110 103

1983–1993 65 (84) 8 413 78 90

1994–2006 106 (122) 26 462 136 108

Intermediate stream

Tanllwyth 1991–2006 276 (276) 109 1030 238 282

1991–1993 218 (215) 109 503 198 266

1994–2006 288 (288) 129 1030 266 290

Small streams

South2Hore 1988–2001 70 (99) 12 862 41 118

1988–1993 50 (73) 22 153 30 93

1994–2001 70 (99) 12 862 48 139

50 (73) 22 153 40 115

83 (113) 12 264 45 139

South East 1f 1994–2001 53 (47) 6 496 102 52

South East 3c 1994–1999 12 (19) 0 203 20 21

Tanllwyth Nc 1994–1999 911 (498) 162 4690 1673 374

Tanllwyth Sf 1994–2001 899 (638) 57 2462 1186 639

Groundwater

Ha4Bf 1994–2001 18 0 169 20 13

Quarry 1994–2001 10 0 78 14 13

SE1Bf 1995–1999 296 2 3729 825 13

SE3Bc 1995–1999 11 0 108 17 15

TanNBc 1994–1999 7181 7 17,199 9923 15,238

TanSBf 1994–1999 70 4 3475 266 32

US1 1994–1995 82 0 195 NA NA

US2 1994–1995 53 0 480 NA NA

US3 1994–1995 29 0 295 NA NA

Aquat Geochem (2008) 14:263–288 269

123

Hafren (4.41 ± 1.06 lg l-1 yr-1), upper Hore (5.59 ± 1.60 lg l-1 yr-1), lower Hore

(6.48 ± 1.25 lg l-1 yr-1), South2Hore (9.18 ± 2.16 lg l-1 yr-1) and the Tanllwyth

(15.1 ± 2.3 lg l-1 yr-1). This represents a sequence of increasing forest/harvested-

forest cover and increasing gley soils.

• There are also four small stream sites draining podzol (SE3c, SE1c) and gley (TanNc,

TanSf). For these sites (c = control, f = felled and the monitoring periods were from

1994 to 1999 and 2001, respectively), the felled sites showed no statistically significant

trend, but there were some clear increases over time for the controls with the gley site

showing the greatest increase, although near the start of the record there were some

high Fe concentrations encountered. The gradients for the podzol (SE3c) and gley

(TanN) sites were 2.81 ± 1.31 and 151 ± 56 lg l-1 yr-1, respectively. In the case of

TanN, this had the highest average Fe concentration for all the sites monitored and it

was also the most reducing with low levels of nitrate, often below the detection limit.

In terms of average, there is a separation between catchments dominated by peat and

podzolic soils and those dominated by gley. For peat and podzolic soil cases, Fe con-

centrations average around 70 lg l-1 (range of averages 12 to 138 lg l-1) and the highest

averages occur for the larger catchments. In contrast, for catchments that are dominated by

gley soils, Fe concentrations are higher. For example, for the two small gley drainage areas

monitored (Tanllwyth Nc and Sf), Fe concentrations average around 900 lg l-1 while for

the main stem of the Nant Tanllwyth, concentrations are lower averaging 277 lg l-1.

The increases in Fe concentrations over time occur generally for both across the flow

range and for baseflow and stormflow, but the greatest proportionate change seems to occur

under baseflow conditions (Table 3). For example for the pre- and post-1993 periods Fe

concentration increases for the lower Hafren by 50% on average, by 77% for the low-flow

average and 32% for the high-flow average: the corresponding averages for the upper

Hafren is 18, 97 and 6% while for the lower Hore it is 63, 74 and 20%.

In the case of the Hore, Fe concentrations peak around 2002 and it is at this time when

there was relatively high forestry activity within the upper part of the catchment and some

land/forest-road disturbance with heavy vehicles used for felling. Nonetheless, there was

no clear nitrate felling signal, and the spikes in Fe concentration at this time probably

reflect some aspect other than the ‘normal’ felling response such as land disturbance. In

addition, there is an increase in Fe concentration during the latter part of 2006 when there

was further felling activity—as earlier in the record, there is no clear nitrate increase with

felling, but at this later time concentrations of other ions such as potassium increase and

this seems tied to weathering components.

Table 3 continued

Period Average Minimum Maximum Low flow High flow

IS1 1994–1995 1 0 20 NA NA

IS2 1994–1995 131 0 1945 NA NA

LS1 1994–1995 126 0 760 NA NA

LS2 1994–1995 1207 0 2715 NA NA

LS3 1994–1995 7 0 60 NA NA

LS4 1994–1995 117 0 885 NA NA

VB1 1994–1995 745 0 3735 NA NA

The low flow and high flow values represent the average for the bottom and top 10% of flows, respectively.An outlier point is excluded for the Upper Hore and the Tanllwyth and 2 outlier points for South2Hore

270 Aquat Geochem (2008) 14:263–288

123

3.3 Groundwater

Groundwater Fe concentrations vary considerably across the sites, with a range in average

of 1 to 7181 lg l-1 (Table 3). The highest Fe concentrations occur for one borehole

associated with gley soils (TanNBc) and an artesian borehole with podzolic soil cover

(LS2). In both cases, green flocs can occur in the water especially under artesian conditions

Table 4 Linear regression of Fe with time and with DOC for Plynlimon streams. Excluded is 1 outlier eachfor the Upper Hore and Tanllwyth and 2 for South2Hore

Period Fe regression against time

Time 2*std Const 2*std r2 Nlg Fe yr-1

Rainfall 1983–2006 0.22 0.19 –434 38 0.006 922

Cloud water 1990–2006 -6.4 3.1 12,983 374 0.026 681

Upper Hafren 1990–2006 3.08 0.93 -6067 127 0.051 824

1994–2006 3.73 1.23 -7360 119 0.054 646

Lower Hafren 1983–2006 3.43 0.39 -6752 94 0.208 1259

1983–1993 1.43 1.04 -2379 78 0.010 608

1994–2006 4.41 1.06 -8695 105 0.093 651

Upper Hore 1984–2006 5.52 0.53 -10,915 117 0.273 1149

1984–1993 0.35 0.96 -616 60 0.001 499

1994–2006 5.59 1.60 -11,051 145 0.078 647

Lower Hore 1983–2006 4.12 0.41 -8130 101 0.240 1259

1983–1993 0.45 0.90 -834 69 0.002 608

1994–2006 6.48 1.25 -12,856 121 0.141 652

South2Hore 1988–2001 5.45 0.78 -10811 74 0.236 636

1988–1993 0.65 1.99 -1155 52 0.001 277

1994–2001 9.18 2.16 -18,259 84 0.168 359

Tanllwyth 1991–2006 12.7 1.7 -25,200 189 0.245 693

1994–2006 15.1 2.3 -29,907 193 0.229 575

Fe regression against DOC

DOC 2*std Const 2*std r2 Nlg Fe mg-C-1

Rainfall 1983–2006 9.8 1.7 4.0 28.6 0.131 851

Cloud water 1990–2006 33.8 2.0 -13.6 137 0.652 637

Throughfall 1984–1991 0.6 0.2 29.1 55.9 0.145 142

Stemflow 1984–1991 3.6 0.4 9.8 66.8 0.746 132

U Hafren 1990–2006 49.3 2.5 26.0 71.3 0.662 776

L Hafren 1983–2006 36.0 1.6 38.3 63.9 0.631 1165

U Hore 1984–2006 31.9 3.5 64.6 110.7 0.228 1096

L Hore 1983–2006 28.9 2.9 43.3 88.6 0.245 1199

South2Hore 1988–2001 29.7 4.0 18.7 94.9 0.255 638

Tanllwyth 1991–2006 38.2 2.7 147.7 151.7 0.544 691

For the Upper Hafren and the Tanllwyth, the regression just for the period prior to 1994 is not included dueto the shortness of record

Aquat Geochem (2008) 14:263–288 271

123

Fig. 1 Time series plots of Fe concentration. The upper Hafren represents a moorland case; the lowerHafren represents gradual/phased felling over the past 20 years while the Afon Hore represents major clear-fell between 1985 and 1989. For the Tanllwyth and South2Hore felling occurred in 1996 and in 1989,respectively

272 Aquat Geochem (2008) 14:263–288

123

within the borehole when water turbulence is at its highest. These flocs turn brown on

exposure to the air. This seems to represent the classic case of Fe(II) mobilisation within

the anoxic groundwater conditions and oxidation to Fe(III) on exposure to the air. This type

of feature is also observed within the streams where there are clear groundwater seepages

especially in gley areas.

3.4 Soils

The data are summarised in Table 5 together with analogous data from four horizons

within a peaty podzol under acid grassland and moorland vegetation in the adjacent Wye

catchment.

All the soils are highly acidic and both Fe and DOC concentrations can vary consid-

erably and the highest Fe concentrations occur for the podzol within the Oh-horizon. Prior

to felling, Fe concentrations average 410 lg l-1 compared with 40 and 20 lg l-1 in the

Lf- and C-horizons, respectively, while post-felling Fe concentrations are double to treble

Table 5 Concentrations of Fe (mg l-1) in soil waters at Plynlimon

Iron (lg l-1) DOC (mg l-1) pH

LF Oh Eag Bs C LF Oh Eag Bs C LF Oh Eag Bs C

Grassland

Mean – 160 90 50 10 – 11.1 5.5 3.7 1.9 – 4.25 4.42 4.51 4.83

Min – 20 \10 \10 \10 – 0.4 0.3 0.9 0.4 – 3.75 3.98 4.11 4.39

Max – 440 1670 190 90 – 63 19.8 8.7 11 4.70 4.96 4.96 5.19

Forest Podzol

Pre-fell

Mean 40 410 330 50 20 17.9 11.9 10.6 5.5 3.4 4.25 3.94 4.11 4.38 4.6

Min \10 60 50 \10 \10 5.5 3.8 0.8 2.9 1.4 3.91 3.70 3.91 4.24 4.38

Max 140 720 510 450 70 56 39 23 11 10 4.83 4.70 4.3 4.67 4.89

Post-fell

Mean 140 860 310 50 10 65.8 27.5 14.3 8 5.6 4.48 3.80 3.96 4.21 4.49

Min \10 70 60 \10 \10 8.9 6.8 5.6 2.9 2.1 3.94 3.50 3.54 3.98 4.25

Max 500 2040 830 200 100 180 58 68 47 65 5.54 4.50 4.52 4.53 4.99

Lf Oh E Bs C Lf Oh E B C Lf Oh E B C

Forest Gley

Pre-fell

Mean 40 430 250 1390 300 13.7 13.2 7 4.7 4 4 3.89 3.94 4.29 4.5

Min \10 100 20 60 10 3.8 4.7 4.5 1.8 1.3 3.53 3.59 3.78 4.04 4.34

Max 180 1010 1020 3370 1700 40 49 15 11 7.5 4.58 4.38 4.18 4.58 4.68

Post-fell

Mean 120 870 450 1630 500 55.6 29.2 9.6 5.6 4.5 4.08 3.76 3.91 4.29 4.31

Min \10 90 20 \10 \10 13 6.5 5.3 1.1 1.6 3.62 3.50 3.6 3.94 4.01

Max 300 2000 1000 5030 2610 110 61 28 23 8.8 4.66 4.00 4.22 4.61 4.70

Sampling periods: grassland podzol: 14/8/1984 to 27/9/1984; forest podzol: 20/11/1984 to 2/1/1990; forestgley: 18/12/1984 to 2/1/1990. Clear-felling: forest podzol: between 10/2/1987 and 7/4/1987; forest gley:between 21/4/1987 and 19/5/1987

Aquat Geochem (2008) 14:263–288 273

123

these values in the Lf- and Oh-horizons with little difference in the lower horizons. The

highest Fe concentrations occur for the gley within the Bs-horizon and there are elevated

concentrations in the Oh-horizon as well. Prior to felling, the average concentrations are

40, 430, 250, 1390 and 300 lg l-1 in the Lf-, Oh-, Eag-, Bs- and C-horizons, respectively,

while post-felling Fe concentrations are higher with factors of 3.0, 2.0, 1.8, 1.2 and 1.7,

respectively. For both podzol and gley soils, the Fe concentrations are correlated with DOC

for the Lf-, Oh- and Eag-horizons, but much more poorly correlated in the Bs- and

C-horizons as well as for the Eag-horizon in the podzol (Table 6). With felling, the

increases in Fe concentration are mirrored with increases in DOC.

Concentrations of Fe in soil solutions from beneath mature conifer forest were higher

than those observed in grassland and moorland soils, whilst clear-felling of the forest

resulted in a further increase in Fe concentrations (Table 5). The Lf-horizon comprises

mainly forest litter plus decomposing vegetation from the pre-existing moorland. As a

consequence of this, Fe concentrations are very low, and Fe in the soil water will be

primarily derived from the organic matter itself plus any mineral material incorporated as a

result of site preparation and planting. The site was ploughed before planting but the

lysimeters were installed beneath mature forest in the undisturbed ‘bench’ at the side of the

plough furrows. The mobility of Fe is clearly linked to DOC in this horizon although Fe

availability is probably limited. In the Oh-horizon, the relationship between Fe and DOC is

much stronger with relatively little scatter. The Oh-horizon contains highly weathered

mineral material and abundant organic matter. The relationship weakens in the E horizon

as other controls, probably redox, become more important during periods of waterlogging

and anaerobicity. Redox processes probably dominate Fe mobility in the mainly anaerobic

B- and C-horizons where Fe concentrations are large but unrelated to DOC. In the Bs- and

C-horizons of the gley, conditions are highly reducing (in the field, the waters/soils smelt

strongly of hydrogen sulphide). In the Eag-horizon, mottling indicated seasonal water

logging which resulted in short-lived increases in Fe concentrations where a sharp peak in

Fe and a more muted DOC response coincided with heavy rainfall in the late summer of

1985. Thus, there are very different processes are operating in the two soil types.

Table 6 Coefficients and r2 values for the least squares regression between Fe and DOC in podzol and gleyforest soil waters at Plynlimon

Gradient 2*std Intercept 2*std r2 N Fe/DOC

Forest Podzol

Lf 1.93 0.38 6 155 0.480 113 2.1

Oh 28.1 3.3 84 418 0.731 110 32.1

Eag 5.96 2.66 244 223 0.147 119 25.2

Bs 3.17 2.38 30 127 0.057 120 7.5

C 0.87 0.50 11 36 0.094 120 3.2

Forest Gley

Lf 2.05 0.29 5 91 0.642 2.2

Oh 26.8 2.6 80 345 0.815 30.5

Eag 62.7 23.8 -183 335 0.464 42.6

Bs -76.2 137.1 1804 1988 0.014 295

C 102 50 -90 650 0.166 96.7

Italicised data are for regressions of low significance. The data cover pre and post-felling, but there is nosignificant change in gradient pre- and post-fell

274 Aquat Geochem (2008) 14:263–288

123

3.5 Fe Relationships with Alkalinity and DOC

In order to assess Fe mobilisation in relation to acidity and DOC changes, linear regression

was used. Gran alkalinity was used as a marker of acidity rather than pH as it is much more

suitable for examining soil and groundwater inputs: while pH is non-linear, Gran alkalinity

changes are approximately linear on mixing of soil and groundwater.

Iron concentrations show no statistically significant correlation with Gran Alkalinity

based on an analysis of the full dataset and subsets for baseflow and stormflow where there

is a clear contrast in pH. Hence, only DOC will be considered further in the results section.

For the atmospheric inputs, there is a positive correlation between Fe and DOC and the

gradients are variable (Table 4). The highest gradient is for the cloud water (33.8 ± 2.0 lg

Fe mg-C-1) with rainfall intermediate (9.8 ± 1.7 lg Fe mg-C-1) and throughfall and

stemflow the lowest (0.6 ± 0.2 and 3.6 ± 0.4 lg Fe mg-C-1, respectively).

For the streams, Fe concentrations are strongly and linearly correlated with DOC

(Table 4). For the main streams the gradient is similar across the sites at around 36 lg-Fe

mg-C-1 with a range of 28.9 to 49.3 lg-Fe mg-C-1 and the highest gradients occur for the

upper Hafren and the Tanllwyth. The gradients are similar for the earlier and later parts of

the record and there is little difference between pre- and post-fell periods. For the small

streams there is a similar Fe:DOC gradient range (21.5 to 39.1 lg-Fe mg-C-1).

For the groundwater, there is no statistically significant relationship between Fe and

DOC concentrations.

For the soils, the highest ratios of Fe:DOC occur within the Oh- and Eag-horizons of the

podzol (32.1 and 25.2 lg mg-1, respectively, compared with 2.06–7.51 lg mg-1 within

the other horizons). Correspondingly, the Fe/DOC ratio increases with depth for the gley

soils with highest average concentrations in the Bs-horizon (295 lg mg-1 in the

Bs-horizon compared with 2.19 and 96.7 lg mg-1 in the Lf- and C-horizons, respectively).

3.6 The UK Acid Waters Monitoring Network

Seasonal Kendall analysis indicates that there are significant (p\0.05) Fe trends at 14 of

the 22 sites, of which 12 were positive. Of the 10 sites with non-significant, zero or

negative trends, 6 had very low Fe concentrations (\0.04 mg l-1), and trend estimates are

believed to have been influenced by frequent below-detection samples: only one site with

mean Fe \0.04 mg l-1, Dargall Lane, had a significant rising trend.

Time series for all sites with mean Fe C0.04 mg l-1 (Fig. 2) illustrate the general

pattern of increasing Fe concentrations. In some cases these trends appear linear and

monotonic, in others there is some indication of a step change and/or levelling off of

concentrations from around 1998. One site, the Bencrom River, had a significant

decreasing trend, which again appears to be associated with a change from 1998 onwards.

Several sites (e.g. Afon Hafren, Old Lodge, Llyn Cwm Mynach, and Bencrom River) are

affected by one or more high-Fe outliers. These could be associated with analytical errors,

although some appear to be sustained over more than one consecutive sample, or to

coincide with peaks in other determinands, suggesting that they may be associated with

real but infrequent high-Fe events. In particular, the very large September 2002 peak at Old

Lodge coincided with unprecedented high DOC concentrations at this stream, and very low

discharge.

There is a close association between Fe and DOC within the UKAWMN, both spatially

and temporally. Site mean concentrations of Fe and DOC are strongly correlated (Fig. 3a;

Aquat Geochem (2008) 14:263–288 275

123

r2 = 0.83, p \ 0.001), although within this general relationship there is considerable

variability in the site mean Fe:DOC ratio, from 6 to 93 lg Fe mg-C-1. The amount of Fe

per unit DOC increases as mean DOC increases (Fig. 3b, r2 = 0.49, p\0.001), indicating

that the relationship shown in Fig. 3a is non-linear.

There is also a strong temporal correlation between Fe and DOC concentrations of

individual samples at most sites (Table 2), but again the gradient of this relationship varies

between sites (9 to 66 lg Fe mg-C-1). In part, this correlation may reflect similar short-

term discharge responses (i.e. both Fe and DOC increase at high flow). However, analysis

of Seasonal Kendall Trend estimates show that rates of long-term change in Fe and DOC

are also correlated. Significant Fe and DOC trends coincide at 13 sites, and for these sites

there is a positive correlation between Fe and DOC trend slope (Fig. 4, r2 = 0.56, p =

0.003). Incorporating the remaining sites (seven with non-significant Fe trends and two

with non-significant DOC trends) still produces a significant correlation (r2 = 0.40, p =

0.002). Therefore, both the spatial and temporal factors that control Fe concentration are

similar (but not identical) to those that determine DOC concentration.

There is one moorland site within the UKAWMN, the Gwy, which lies within the

Plynlimon catchments: the Gwy is the upper part of the River Wye and it is adjacent to

the upper River Severn and both have sources in the Plynlimon plateau area. The Gwy and

0

0.1

0.2

1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006

1. Loch Coire nan Arr

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006

3. Allt na Coire nan Con

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006

5. Loch Chon

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006

6. Loch Tinker

0

0.05

0.1

1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006

7. Round Loch of Glenhead

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006

8. Loch Grannoch

0

0.3

0.6

0.9

1.2

1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 20060

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006

13. Old Lodge

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006

15. Llyn Llagi

0

0.1

0.2

1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006

16. Llyn Cwm Mynach

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006

17. Afon Hafren

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006

18. Afon Gwy

0

0.51

1.52

2.53

3.54

4.5

1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006

19. Beaghs Burn

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006

20. Bencrom River

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006

mg

l -1m

gl -1

mg

l -1m

gl -1

mg

l -1

mg

l -1m

gl -1

mg

l -1m

gl -1

mg

l -1

mg

l -1m

gl -1

mg

l -1m

gl -1

mg

l -1

22. Coneyglen Burn

12. River Etherow

Fig. 2 Time series of Fe concentration for the UKAWMN sites: time series for 7 sites with mean Feconcentrations below 0.04 mg l-1 are not shown. Also, in a few cases the scale has been expanded toexclude anomalously high values as including them would obscure the underlying pattern. Numbers onfigures correspond to UKAWMN site numbers

276 Aquat Geochem (2008) 14:263–288

123

the upper Hafren moorland sites show similar trends: the gradients for the Gwy (excluding

4 outlier values) and the upper Hafren are 3.66 ± 2.15 and 3.73 ± 1.23 lg l-1 yr-1,

respectively (both p \ 0.001).

3.7 Modelling Iron Speciation

3.7.1 ‘‘Truly Dissolved’’ and Microparticulate Fe(III)

The Fe determined in this study is operationally defined (Kennedy et al. 1974) as the

fraction that passes a 0.45 lm filter. This fraction will comprise in part ‘‘truly dissolved

Fe’’, that is Fe2+ and Fe3+ ions together with their complexes with inorganic ligands and

organic matter. It is also clear from past research that this fraction contains Fe-rich colloids

(e.g. Stolpe et al. 2005), probably in the form of amorphous Fe oxyhydroxides. Knowledge

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0 5 10 15

DOC (mg l-1)

Fe

(mg

l-1)

a)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0 5 10 15

DOC (mg l-1)F

e/D

OC

(m

g m

g-1

)

b)

Fig. 3 The relationship between Fe and DOC mean concentrations is examined for the UKAWMN riversand lakes. The graph on the left represents a plot of mean Fe versus mean DOC, while the graph on the rightrepresents the mean of the ratio of Fe to DOC against the mean DOC for each site

-0.004

-0.002

0

0.002

0.004

0.006

0.008

0.01

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5

DOC trend slope (mg l-1 yr-1)

Fe

tren

d sl

ope

(mg

l-1 y

r-1)

Fig. 4 Estimated trend slopesfor Fe versus DOC at theUKAWMN sites. Filled circlesindicate sites with significant (p\ 0.05) trends in both Fe andDOC. Open circles indicate siteswith non-significant Fe trends,open diamonds sites with non-significant DOC trends.Regression best-fit line is basedon sites with significant trends inboth Fe and DOC

Aquat Geochem (2008) 14:263–288 277

123

of the distribution of measured Fe between microparticulate and ‘‘truly dissolved’’ forms is

important in interpreting the temporal trends, particularly to establish whether the corre-

lation observed between Fe and DOC in the streams can be attributed to changes in Fe

bound to natural organic matter. Lofts et al. (2008) recently proposed a method for the

estimation of the ‘‘truly dissolved’’ Fe(III) in a water, based on the assumption that (i) Fe3+

activity is controlled by equilibrium with a solid oxyhydroxide phase and (ii) that the

concentrations of Fe(III) bound to ligands may be predicted given knowledge of the

relevant binding strengths. Conventionally, the oxyhydroxide precipitate is defined as

having the formula Fe(OH)3(s) and the solubility equilibrium is:

Fe OHð Þ3ðsÞ# þ3Hþ $ Fe3þ þ 3H2O; Kso ¼aFe3þ

a3Hþ

ð1Þ

where aFe3þ and aHþ are the solution activities of Fe3+ and H+, respectively, and Kso is the

solubility product. Research on the solubility of ferric hydroxide in artificial solutions (e.g.

Byrne and Luo 2000) indicates that the apparent Fe3+:H+ stoichiometry in the solubility

relationship is less than 3, either due to incorporation of anionic elements into the solid, or

due to particle size effects on the activity of Fe(OH)3 (s). By dialysing natural waters to

remove Fe oxyhydroxide and speciation modelling of the dialysates, using WHAM/Model

VI (Tipping 1994, 1998), Lofts et al. (2008) developed the following solubility relationship:

K 0so ¼aFe3þ

a2:70Hþ¼ 102:93 at 283 K ð2Þ

Using this relationship and the chemical composition of the water in question (after

filtration) it is possible to calculate the concentration of ‘‘truly dissolved’’ Fe(III) without

a priori knowledge of the filterable Fe. The concentrations of non ‘‘truly dissolved’’ Fe, e.g.

Fe(III) oxyhydroxides, microparticulate Fe-containing clays and Fe(II) species, may then

be calculated by difference. In all the calculations done here, dissolved organic matter

(DOM) was assumed to be 65% chemically ‘‘active’’. The chemically active fraction of

DOM was represented in WHAM/Model VI by fulvic acid, with an Fe(III) binding con-

stant of 2.6.

Speciation of filterable Fe in the Lower Hafren was calculated for mean stormflow,

baseflow and overall conditions. Under mean stormflow conditions (pH 4.5 and DOC 3.0

mg l-1) the model predicted 6% of Fe to be Fe(III) bound to organic matter (Fe(III)-DOM),

18% to be inorganically bound Fe(III) and 76% to be microparticulate or Fe(II). Under

mean baseflow conditions (pH 6.5 and DOC 0.9 mg l-1), the model predicted 5% of Fe to

be Fe(III)-DOM, 2% to be inorganically bound Fe(III) and 93% to be microparticulate or

Fe(II). Under overall mean conditions (pH 5.4 and DOC 1.5 mg l-1) the model predicted

3% Fe(III)-OM, 6% inorganically bound Fe(III) and 91% microparticulate or Fe(II). Thus

the predicted speciation indicates that microparticulate forms of Fe, probably mostly

Fe(III) oxyhydroxides, predominate across all flow conditions.

Speciation of Fe may also be considered by calculating the predicted ratio of Fe(III) to

dissolved organic matter (DOM) due to Fe(III):DOM complexation, for a range of pH and

a typical water composition. This ratio includes free ionic and inorganically complexed

Fe(III) and Fe(III) bound to DOM. This ratio (termed the apparent m, with units of moles

Fe(III) per g DOM, to distinguish it from the true m, which is the amount of Fe(III) bound to

DOM per g DOM) takes a characteristic set of values given a particular Fe(III) oxyhy-

droxide solubility, under the assumption of solubility control of the Fe3+ activity. If the

measured ratio of filterable Fe to filterable organic matter exceeds the predicted ratio, this

can be taken as an indication of the presence of microparticulate Fe and/or Fe(II). This

278 Aquat Geochem (2008) 14:263–288

123

relationship is examined in Fig. 5 for the lower Hafren, the Nant Tanllwyth, and Plynlimon

groundwater separated into catchments with podzolic soils (lower Afon Hafren) and gley

soils (Nant Tanllwyth).

The apparent m values for both systems are characteristic of the presence of micropar-

ticulate Fe or Fe(II) across the entire range of pH encountered. In the surface waters this Fe is

likely to be mostly oxyhydroxides rather than Fe(II). However, in the case of groundwater,

Fig. 5 Apparent m and our estimate of true m versus pH for the lower Afon Hafren, the Nant Tanllwyth,Plynlimon groundwater with podzol and gley cover and the UKAWMN rivers and lakes. N.b. for theUKAWMN data, no value for apparent m is used where Fe or DOC concentrations are below the detection limit

Aquat Geochem (2008) 14:263–288 279

123

there is a clear separation between podzolic and gley soil. For both the podzolic and gley soil

cases the data mainly fall above the solubility line. The results are similar to that for the

streams except that the apparent m values are an order of magnitude greater with the gley

groundwater than the streams while for the podzols the values are intermediate. For the

groundwater podzol case the greatest apparent m values occurs for the HA4 borehole with the

early part of the record. For this early part of the record and for the gley groundwater cases in

general, microparticulate Fe is probably of importance as with the streams, but there is also

an additional Fe(II) component that reflects the reducing conditions.

With respect to Fe speciation for the UKAWMN rivers the thermodynamic plots

(Fig. 5) indicate a similar feature to that for the Plynlimon streams with m values above or

approaching the solubility line. Further, the observation for the UKAWMN of the amount

of Fe per unit DOC increases as the mean DOC concentration is at odds with the theory

that complexation to DOM controls the variability in Fe concentrations since the amount of

Fe bound per unit DOC should be independent of DOC concentration. WHAM/Model VI

predicts that the Fe:DOC ratio resulting from Fe(III) complexation to DOM (the true m) to

vary between 32.4 and 1.8 lg Fe mg-C-1 between pH 4 and 8. The Fe:DOC ratios

observed in the higher DOC systems clearly exceed these predicted ratios. Thus, the

variability in Fe does not appear to result directly from complexation to DOM in the

streams and lakes.

For the soils, notwithstanding the possible occurrence of solid phase organic complexes

(Van Schaik et al. 2008), analysis of the data using WHAM/Model VI (Fig. 6) indicates for

the podzols that apparent m values are close to the solubility line for soils within the lower soil

horizons, but lie under the line for the near surface horizons that are depleted in inorganic

sources of Fe. The same situation applies for the gley except that in the lower soil horizons

the data lie just above the solubility line and this is consistent with Fe being present in part in

reduced form. However, it must be noted that the use of ceramic cups for extracting soil

waters may filter out micro-particulate material (Reynolds et al. 2004) and that the micro-

particulate form may be underestimated in the lower parts of the soil profile when iron

solubility controls might come into play. Indeed, microparticulate transport of Fe is often

taken as an important mechanism for the formation of these soils (Russell 1966).

3.7.2 Binding to DOM to Fe(III) Oxyhydroxides

The binding of DOM to the surfaces of Fe(III) oxyhydroxides is a well-attested phe-

nomenon under laboratory conditions (e.g. Tipping 1981). Under typical surface water

conditions of circumneutral pH, the process is believed to stabilise oxyhydroxides against

aggregation by giving the particle surface a net negative charge. However, the system is

complex to model mechanistically due to the heterogeneous nature of DOM, and although

some progress has been made in well-defined conditions (e.g. Filius et al. 2000), prediction

of binding in the field using full mechanistic models is not currently feasible. To obtain

some broad estimates of the importance of this process in the absence of a mechanistic

model, we used data obtained by Tipping (1981) to produce an indicate empirical model.

The data in question were for the binding of humic substances (HS), isolated from

Esthwaite Water (a lake in the English Lake District), to a sample of the crystalline iron

oxide goethite, in a water of composition mimicking that of Esthwaite Water. These data

were considered most appropriate for modelling since Tipping (1981) found that binding

was enhanced in solutions mimicking natural waters as opposed to simple electrolyte

solutions. Esthwaite Water is a soft water lake and thus the composition can be regarded as

broadly representative of UK waters draining non-calcareous landscapes.

280 Aquat Geochem (2008) 14:263–288

123

Tipping (1981) measured isotherms for HS binding to the goethite at pH 6, 7 and 8, and

measured the proportion of HS bound for a number of HS:goethite ratios in the pH range

5 to 9. We used the isotherm data to parameterise the model. The model used was a

standard Freundlich isotherm:

HS½ �ads mg m�2 FeOx� �

¼ K � HS½ �diss mg l�1� �1=n

h ið3Þ

We assumed that the concentration of adsorbed HS per unit surface area of the oxide

would be independent of the specific surface area. This would allow the results for the

goethite (specific surface area 15 m2 g-1) to be used to predict binding to amorphous

oxyhydroxides of substantially greater specific surface area. We also assumed that the

Freundlich binding constant K could be described as a simple function of pH,

log K ¼ m � pHþ c; ð4Þ

thus allowing the isotherm to be applied to data at multiple pH values:

log HS½ �ads mg m�2 FeOx� �

¼ m � pHþ cð Þ þ 1=nð Þ � log HS½ �diss mg l�1� �

ð5Þ

Fitting this model gave parameter values m = -0.12, c = 0.96 and n = 2.85 and the

model provides an excellent fit to the observations (Fig. 7). The pH-dependent adsorption

data were used to check the performance of the model. The predictions are largely

Fig. 6 The variations in apparent m and our estimates of true m with pH for podzolic and gley forest soilwaters for the LF-, O-, E-, B- and C-horizons. Data source: Reynolds et al. (1988) and Hughes et al. (1990)

Aquat Geochem (2008) 14:263–288 281

123

excellent, including below the lower calibration limit of pH 6 (Fig. 7). The binding of the

lowest concentration of HS is overestimated by the model in comparison with the mea-

surements: this may be due to errors in the measurement of the low residual concentrations

of unadsorbed HS.

For model application it was necessary to estimate the concentration of microparticulate

Fe(III) oxyhydroxide. This was done by taking the difference between the total filterable Fe

and the calculated ‘‘truly dissolved’’ Fe(III) and Fe(II). The truly dissolved Fe(II) was

estimated to be 24% of the total filterable Fe, based on measurements in UK waters

reported by Lofts et al. (2008). The amount of Fe calculated was assumed to be entirely in

oxyhydroxide form and its concentration (g dm-3) was calculated assuming a stoichi-

ometry of Fe(OH)3. A surface area of 600 m2 g-1 was used for scaling adsorption data.

This value was recommended by Dzombak and Morel (1990) for the modelling of the

binding of small ions to Fe(III) oxyhydroxide. It may be an overestimate with respect to

DOM binding, since a large proportion of the surfaces of iron(III) oxyhydroxide are

believed to comprise internal pore space which might not be readily accessible to DOM

molecules. However, since the purpose of the modelling is to ascertain the general sig-

nificance of the DOM binding process rather than to make precise predictions, we believe

that the assumption is justified. We have also assumed that microparticulate Fe(III) is

entirely in the form of oxyhydroxides. In principle some Fe(III) may well be present in clay

minerals. However we have no information allowing us to reasonably estimate how much

Fe(III) might be in such a form. As before, we justify our assumption on the basis that the

dissolved HS (mg l-1)

0 5 10 15 20 25ad

sorb

ed H

S (m

g m

2 )

0

1

2

3

4

5

pH

5 6 7 8 9

% H

S ad

sorb

ed

0

20

40

60

80

100

Fig. 7 Top pane: Results offitting binding model toadsorption isotherms for HSbinding to goethite after Tipping(1981). Symbols denote bindingat different pHs: circles, pH 6;triangles, pH 7; squares, pH 8.Total oxide surface area *1.5 m2

g-1. Lines are model fits. Bottompane: predictions of HS bindingto goethite made using theparameterised binding model.Symbols different totalconcentrations of HS: circles,1.08 mg l-1; triangles, 2.71 mgl-1; squares, 5.42 mg l-1;diamonds, 10.83 mg l-1; invertedtriangles, 27.08 mg l-1. Totaloxide surface area *1.5 m2 g-1.Lines are model fits

282 Aquat Geochem (2008) 14:263–288

123

model is intended to give a broad rather than a precise picture of the importance of surface

DOM binding.

For baseflow, stormflow and average conditions at Plynlimon, the model predicted that

4%, 6% and 5% of DOM would be bound to iron(III) oxyhydroxides. Thus, at least under

the conditions prevailing at Plynlimon, the association of DOM and Fe by the binding of

the former to oxides of the latter appears to be a minor process. By corollary the con-

centrations of unbound DOM in the streams are in excess relative to the concentrations

bound to the oxyhydroxide surfaces.

Predictions of DOM binding to Fe oxyhydroxides for the UKAWMN sites generally

indicate similar results to that for Plynlimon. Of the 22 UKAWMN sites, only at five

(River Etherow, Old Lodge, Afon Hafren, Beagh’s Burn and Coneyglen Burn) was more

than 5% of DOM predicted to be bound on average. Considerable temporal variability in

the proportion of DOM bound was indicated, for example, between 2% and 81% for Old

Lodge and between 0.3% and 34% for Beagh’s Burn. In Beagh’s Burn and Coneyglen

Burn, high bound proportions of DOM were associated with high pH (typically above 6.5),

high Fe and low flow conditions.

4 Discussion

Iron concentrations in rainfall are relatively low, and the highest levels occur at low

volumes of catch due to lack of dilution of particles scavenged from the atmosphere. There

can be a significant deposition flux related to the cloud water input (Wilkinson et al. 1997).

Iron concentrations in throughfall and stemflow are generally low and this reflects limited

cycling through the vegetation. As with rainfall, the highest Fe concentrations occur with

low volumes of catch/flow in cloud water, stemflow and throughflow. Iron in the streams is

essentially derived from the catchment (typically around 90 to 95%; Durand et al. 1994;

Neal et al. 1997a). The highest Fe concentrations occur within the soil and groundwater

and the highest values are probably associated with redox controls where Fe is mobilised

under reducing conditions (Drever 1997; Appelo and Postma 1999). Under the well-

oxygenated surface waters, Fe2+ oxidises and there is the potential for Fe3+ precipitation/

colloid formation. Indeed, the trends in Fe within the streams are consistent with increased

anoxia within the organic rich soils as the catchments wet up—this is a particular feature

for the Plynlimon forested catchments where there has been a relatively large and long-

lasting increase in the low flows (Q95) and a corresponding but limited change in the

baseflow index (Robinson and Dupeyrat 2005) as felling has occurred. Nonetheless, the

increase in the rate of increase in Fe concentration around 1993–1994 does not correspond

with forest harvesting, and the changes observed cannot simply be linked to the timing and

extent of the fell.

One of the strongest features of the Fe stream data for Plynlimon and the rivers and lakes

within the UKAWMN is that there is a positive trend over time with a corresponding

increase in extremes concentration. A similar pattern has been observed for DOC at Ply-

nlimon (Neal et al. 2005) and in the UKAWMN streams (Evans et al. 2006). This feature is

probably associated with a concentration increase in the Fe- and DOC-rich soils. While lakes

clearly function in different ways to the rivers, with longer residence times, and greater

mixing of water from different sources within the lake, there nonetheless seems to be some

similarity. A particular feature of the analysis, for both the Plynlimon and UKAWMN

datasets, is a general correlation between Fe and DOC concentrations in both space and time.

The spatial relationship exhibits higher Fe:DOC ratios in waters having higher DOC

Aquat Geochem (2008) 14:263–288 283

123

concentrations. DOC concentrations are generally highest in waters draining peat (Hope

et al. 1997), but substantial DOC export can also occur from other soils, particularly soils

with a deep organic horizon, such as peaty podzol and peaty gley (Evans et al. 2007). In the

case of peaty podzols, which cover much of the UK upland area including large areas of

Plynlimon and the UKAWMN catchments, these organic-rich horizons are normally aero-

bic, and do not therefore favour Fe export. On the other hand, waterlogged peat and peaty

gley are normally anaerobic, favouring Fe (as well as DOC) export. In other words, the

spatial controls on Fe and DOC release are similar, but not identical: runoff DOC concen-

trations appear to be a function of the presence and extent of organic soils, whereas Fe

concentrations also depend on the extent of waterlogging within this soil.

As the Fe and DOC trends are correlated, and since it is believed that a major reason

DOC is increasing is that acid deposition is falling (Evans et al. 2006; Monteith et al.

2007), the implication is that Fe must be responding to the same driver. However, our

mechanistic modelling clearly indicates that increases in Fe(III)–organic matter com-

plexation in surface waters cannot account for the increases observed in Fe concentrations.

A more likely mechanism is the increased leaching into surface waters of microparticulate

Fe(III) oxyhydroxides formed during oxidation of groundwaters, due to increased binding

of DOM to their surfaces. Alternatively, there may be increased transport of Fe(III) within

soil and groundwaters as organic complexes followed by transformation into micropar-

ticulate form in surface waters following loss of DOM, e.g. by mineralization. Further,

only in the case of the forested catchments at Plynlimon do there seem to be higher rates of

Fe concentration increase post-1993. For the Plynlimon area there seems to be an increase

in the gradient of the Fe time series from moorland to forest and to gley, but this pattern

does not seem to be observed for the UKAWMN sites and general statements cannot be

made as to what particular typology the differences in gradients relate. Thus, it is plausible

that the recent increases in DOM concentrations in surface waters are causing the observed

increases in Fe concentration by binding to oxyhydroxides, thus promoting their solubility

and transfer from soil and groundwater to surface water. One feature to note in this regard

is that for the Plynlimon forested areas, there have been extensive clear-fell or tree-

thinning, and this has led to reduced SOx and non-marine SO4 scavenging from the

atmosphere, thus intensifying the rate of acidification recovery (Neal et al. 2001) relative to

sites with no forest cover or intact forest.

With regard to the soils, the process of podzolisation and gleying are major mechanisms

of soil formation and podzols and gleys are major soil categories for the British uplands

(Curtis et al. 1976). Some of the highest Fe concentrations are observed in the Oh-horizon

relative to other soil units as well as the atmospheric inputs, stream water and groundwater.

Indeed, the Fe:DOC gradient is similar for the Oh-horizon and the Plynlimon streams

draining podzol. The situation is more complex in the case of the gley soils and the Bs-

horizon has particularly high Fe concentrations. An earlier work reported on the controls

on the mobility of Fe (and Al) in the podzols which are spatially dominant in the Plynlimon

catchments (Hughes et al. 1990). The work by Hughes et al. (1990) on the peaty podzols

points to the classic processes of mobilisation of Fe and soluble organic matter in the

surface horizons with downward leaching and deposition of Fe-organic matter complexes

in the Bs- and C-horizons. DOC probably has an important controlling influence on Fe

mobility in the surface horizons of the gley, but redox processes appear to be more

important with depth in the mineral soil. Hughes et al. (1990) conclude that dissolved

organic matter determined the chemistry, solubility and transport of Fe in the Oh-horizon

of the podzols. The distribution of Fe through the podzol profile was consistent with

traditional podzolisation theory, with a marked decrease in Fe and DOC concentrations in

284 Aquat Geochem (2008) 14:263–288

123

the Bs- and C-horizons compared to those observed in the Oh- and Eag-horizons. The

strong positive relationship between DOC and soil temperature and the further increase in

DOC in response to clear-felling provided evidence of a strong biological control on DOC

in these soils. Consequently biological processes also indirectly influence Fe mobility.

In terms of the questions raised in the introduction, the following can be surmised.

Do changes in pH affect Fe mobilisation? Some increased mobilisation of ‘‘truly dis-

solved’’ Fe(III) might be expected with increasing acidification although in practice this

might be countered by decreases in DOM concentrations. As acidification decreases, the

amount of ‘‘truly dissolved’’ Fe(III) mobilised per gram of DOM should decrease, so any

increase in ‘‘truly dissolved’’ Fe(III) must be due to a more than compensatory increase in

DOM concentration. In the present case, Fe concentrations are increasing as acidity is

reducing (i.e. ANC is increasing). The observed increases in Fe are then consistent with our

hypothesis that increasing stream DOM concentration increases microparticulate Fe(III),

since it is now believed that increasing DOM is a response to decreases in acidity. Thus,

changes in pH do affect Fe mobilisation, albeit the mechanisms appear to be indirect and

linked to the response of DOM concentrations to changes in acid inputs.

How important is organic complexation given that the dissolved organic carbon (DOC)levels have been increasing over the last 20 years or more in such systems? WHAM/Model

VI modelling results indicate that despite the clear spatial and temporal relationships

between filterable Fe and DOC, this is not directly related to the degree to which Fe(III) is

complexed by DOM in the streams. Rather, while there is often a correlation between Fe

and DOC, much of the Fe is associated with microparticulates rather than organically

complexed. Association of DOM with the surfaces of microparticulate Fe does not appear

to be an important vector for the transport of DOM itself; increased stabilisation and

solubilisation of microparticulate Fe due to increasing DOM concentrations is a more

likely hypothesis.

Does conifer plantation rotation cycles affect iron mobilisation? There is no clearly

discernable direct forestry harvesting effect within the streams (other than perhaps associ-

ated with extensive harvesting/land-disturbance for the Upper Hore late on in the study), but

there is evidence for Fe (and DOC) concentration increases within the soils following felling.

Are Fe levels such that they may affect water potability given that the uplands provide amajor water resource in this area? The water quality standard for Fe in drinking water is 200

lg l-1 (total, unfiltered maximum allowable concentration) and for the protection of sal-

monids and less sensitive fish is 2000 lg l-1 (dissolved annual average) (Gardiner and Zabel

1991). There are issues for drinking waters and for some of the UK acidic waters as the

extremes in Fe concentrations can exceed the dissolved annual average for fish. In addition,

there are issues of potential impacts on spawning grounds and smothering of benthos from Fe

microparticulates as they flocculate out of solution (Marsden and Mackay 2001; Younger

2001). As previously noted, the FOREGS monitoring data clearly indicate that the issue of

exceedance of the drinking water quality standard is not confined to the UK.

5 Conclusion

Long-term monitoring of UK upland water quality is revealing changes in water quality

that link not only to acidification but also to climate change and climate instability and

presently acidity seems to be reducing (Evans et al. 2001; Jenkins et al. 2001) while DOC

is generally increasing (Worrall et al. 2004), possibly as a consequence of recovery from

acidification (Evans et al. 2006; Monteith et al. 2007). The present study indicates that Fe

Aquat Geochem (2008) 14:263–288 285

123

also is increasing and that the increase is generally associated with DOC and other organic-

related determinands such as bromine and iodine (Neal et al. 2005). For the forested sites at

Plynlimon, where felling will have reduced the atmospheric deposition of acidifying SOx,

the greatest increase in Fe concentrations occur, and the two features may well be related.

Mechanistic insights suggest that this phenomenon of increasing Fe concentrations is not

driven by formation of dissolved Fe(III)–organic matter complexes; a more likely mech-

anism is the stabilisation of increased concentrations of microparticulate Fe (probably

largely Fe(III) oxyhydroxides but possibly some Fe-containing clays) by increasing con-

centrations of DOC. Nevertheless, this remains a tentative conclusion at the moment, since

there remains a need to examine in more detail redox controls, the rate of aeration and

Fe-oxidation of the surface water, and the Fe speciation (in particular Fe2+, Fe3+, inorganic

versus organic forms and micro-particulate components). These aspects warrant further

research. Extension of the work to other temperate regions is also a clear priority in the

context of drinking water quality standards. Correspondingly on the fundamental research

front for Fe in the aquatic environment, there are many issues with regards to colloid/

nanoparticle stabilisation, changes in the pH of zero-point charge for the Fe-DOM couplets

and novel applications of techniques such as small-angle neutron scattering that can

examine controls on natural aquatic nano-colloid interactions in aqueous dispersion (Lead

and Wilkinson 2006; Jarvie and King 2007), all of which merit further study.

Acknowledgements We are indebted to the UKAWMN for allowing us to use their data, and we thankthem for their enthusiasm and openness. Their data show how the UK upland environment is changing ratherthan opinion and long may the programme continue. We are also grateful to David Cooper for running trendanalyses on the UKAWMN dataset.

References

Abesser C, Robinson R, Soulsby C (2006) Iron and manganese cycling in the storm runoff of a Scottishupland catchment. J Hydrol 326:59–78

Appelo CAJ, Postma D (1999) Geochemistry, groundwater and pollution. Balkema, Rotterdam, 536 ppBrandt C, Robinson M, Finch JW (2004) The relation of physical attributes of the Plynlimon catchments to

variations in hydrology and water status. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 8:345–354Buckley CB, Keil L (1990) Acid deposition – drinking water quality and health. In: Edwards RW, Gee AS,

Stonor JH (eds) Acid waters in Wales. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 145–158Byrne RH, Luo YR (2000) Direct observations of nonintegral hydrous ferric oxide solubility products: KSO*

= [Fe3+][H+]–2.86. Geochim. Cosmochim Acta 64:1873–1877CLAG (1995) Critical loads of acid deposition for United Kingdom freshwaters. Critical Loads Advisory

Group Department of the Environment, UK, 79 ppCurtis LF, Courtney FM, Trudgill S (1976) Soils of the British Isles. Longman, London, 364 ppDrever JI (1997) The geochemistry of natural waters. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, 436 ppDurand P, Neal C, Jeffery HA, Ryland GP, Neal M (1994) Major, minor and trace element budgets in the

Plynlimon afforested catchments (Wales): general trends, effects of felling and of climate variations.J Hydrol 157:139–156

Dzombak DA, Morel FMM (1990) Surface complexation modeling: hydrous ferric oxide. Wiley, New YorkEvans CD, Monteith DT (2001) Chemical trends at lakes and streams in the UK Acid Waters Monitoring

Network 1988–2000. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 5:351–366Evans CD, Cullen JM, Alewell C, Kopacek J, Marchetto A, Moldan F, Prechtel A, Rogora M, Vesely J,

Wright RF (2001) Recovery from acidification in European surface waters. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci5:283–298

Evans CD, Chapman PJ, Clark JM, Monteith DT, Cresser MS (2006) Alternative explanations for risingdissolved organic carbon export from organic soils. Glob Chang Biol 12:2044–2053

Evans CD, Freeman C, Cork LG, Thomas DN, Reynolds B, Billett MF, Garnett MH, Norris D (2007)Evidence against recent climate-induced destabilisation of soil carbon from 14C analysis of riverinedissolved organic matter. Geophys Res Lett 34:L07407. doi:10.1029/2007GL029431

286 Aquat Geochem (2008) 14:263–288

123

Filius JD, Lumsdon DG, Meeussen JCL, Hiemstra T, Van Riemsdijk WH (2000) Adsorption of fulvic acidon goethite. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 64:51–60

Freeman C, Evans CD, Monteith DT (2001) Export of organic carbon from peat soils. Nature 412:785Gardiner J, Zabel T (1991). United Kingdom water quality standards arising from European Community

Directives—an update. Foundations for Water Research, Allen House, The Listons, Liston Road,Marlow, Bucks, SL7 1FD, UK, 27 pp

Greenwood NN, Earnshaw A (2005) Chemistry of the elements. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1341 ppHornung M, Bull KR, Cresser M, Ullyett J, Hall JR, Langan S, Loveland PJ, Wilson MJ (1995) The

sensitivity of surface waters of Great Britain to acidification predicted from catchment characteristics.Environ Poll 87:207–214

Hudson JA, Gilman K, Calder I (1997) Land use and water quality issues in the uplands with reference to thePlynlimon study. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 1:389–397

Hughes S, Reynolds B, Roberts JD (1990) The influence of land management on concentrations of dissolvedorganic carbon and its effects on the mobilization of aluminium and iron in podzol soils in Mid-Wales.Soil Use Manag 6:137–144

Jarvie HP, King SM (2007) Small-angle neutron scattering study of natural aquatic nanocolloids. EnvironSci Tech 41:2868–2873

Jenkins A, Ferrier RC, Wright RF (eds) (2001) Assessment of recovery of European surface waters fromacidification 1970–2000. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 5:273–542

Kennedy VC, Zellweger GW, Jones BF (1974) Filter pore size effects on the analysis of Al, Fe, Mn and Tiin water. Water Resour Res 10:785–790

Lead JR, Wilkinson KJ (2006) Aquatic colloids and nanoparticles: current knowledge and future trends.Environ Chem 3:159–179

Lofts S, Tipping E, Hamilton-Taylor J (2008) The chemical speciation of Fe(III) in freshwaters. AquatGeochem (in press)

Marsden MW, Mackay DW (2001) Water quality of Scotland: the view of the regulator. Sci Tot Environ265:369–386

Monteith DT, Evans CD (2000) The United Kingdom Acid Waters Monitoring Network: 10 year report.ENSIS, London

Monteith DT, Stoddard JL, Evans CD, De Wit HA, Forsius M, Hogasen T, Wilander A, Skjelkvale BL,Jeffries DS, Vuorenmaa J, Keller B, Kopacek J, Vesely J (2007) Dissolved organic carbon trendsresulting from changes in atmospheric deposition chemistry. Nature 450:537–540

Neal C (ed) (1997) Water quality of the Plynlimon Catchment (UK). Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 1:381–764Neal C (2000) The fractionation of the elements in river waters with respect to the continental crust: a UK

perspective based on a river enrichment factor approach. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 4:499–509Neal C, Wilkinson RJ, Neal M, Harrow ML, Wickham H, Hill L, Morfitt C (1997a) The hydrochemistry of

the headwaters of the River Severn, Plynlimon, Wales. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 1:583–618Neal C, Robson AJ, Shand P, Edmunds WM, Dixon AJ, Buckley DK, Hill S, Harrow ML, Neal M, Reynolds

B (1997b) The occurrence of groundwater in the Lower Palaeozoic rocks of upland Central Wales.Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 1:3–18

Neal C, Reynolds B, Neal M, Pugh B, Wickham H (2001) Long term changes in the water quality of rainfall,cloud-water and stream water for moorland, forested and clear-felled catchments at Plynlimon. HydrolEarth Syst Sci 5:459–476

Neal C, Ormerod SJ, Langan SJ, Nisbet TR, Roberts J (2004) Sustainability of UK forestry: contemporaryissues for the protection of freshwaters, a conclusion. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 8:589–595

Neal C, Robson AJ, Neal M, Reynolds B (2005) Dissolved organic carbon for upland acidic and acidsensitive catchments in mid-Wales. J Hydrol 304:203–220

Reynolds B, Neal C, Hornung M, Hughes S, Stephens PA (1988) Impact of afforestation on the soil solutionchemistry of stagnopodzols in Mid-Wales. Water Air Soil Poll 38:55–70

Reynolds B, Stevens PA, Hughes S, Brittain SA (2004) Comparison of field techniques for sampling soilsolution in upland peatland. Soil Use Manag 20:454–456

Robinson M, Dupeyrat A (2005) Effect of commercial timber harvesting on streamflow regimes in thePlynlimon catchments, mid-Wales. Hydrol Proc 19:1213–1226

Russell EW (1966) Soil conditions and plant growth, 9th edn. Longmans, London, 688 ppSalminen, R, Batista, MJ, Bidovec et al (2005) Geochemical Atlas of Europe. Part 1: background infor-

mation, methodology and maps. Geological Survey of Finland, EspooStolpe B, Hassellov M, Andersson K, Turner DR (2005) High resolution ICPMS as an on-line detector for

flow field-flow fractionation; multi-element determination of colloidal size distributions in a naturalwater sample. Anal Chim Acta 535:109–121

Aquat Geochem (2008) 14:263–288 287

123

Tipping E (1981) The adsorption of aquatic humic substances by iron oxides. Geochim Cosmochim Acta45:191–199

Tipping E (1994) WHAM—a chemical equilibrium model and computer code for waters, sediments andsoils incorporating a discrete site/electrostatic model of ion-binding by humic substances. CompGeosci 20:973–1023

Tipping E (1998) Humic ion-binding model VI: an improved description of the interactions of protons andmetal ions with humic substances. Aquat Geochem 4:3–48

Turner DR, Hunter KA, De Barr HJW (2001) Introduction. In: Turner DR, Hunter KA (eds) The biogeo-chemistry of iron in seawater. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 1 p

Van Schaik JWJ, Persson I, Berggren Kleja D, Gustafsson JP (2008) EXAFS study on the reactions betweeniron and fulvic acid in acid aqueous solutions. Environ Sci Technol 42:2367–2373

Wilkinson RJ, Reynolds B, Neal C, Hill S, Neal M, Harrow ML (1997) Major, minor and trace elementcomposition of cloud water and rain water at Plynlimon, Mid-Wales. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 1(3):557–570

Worrall F, Harriman R, Evans CD, Watts CD, Adamson J, Neal C, Tipping E, Burt T, Grieve I, Monteith D,Naden PS, Nisbet T, Reynolds B, Stevens P (2004) Trends in dissolved organic carbon in UK riversand lakes. Biogeochem 70:369–402

Younger PL (2001) Mine water pollution in Scotland: nature, extent and preventative strategies. Sci TotEnviron 265:309–326

288 Aquat Geochem (2008) 14:263–288

123


Recommended