Date post: | 20-Jan-2023 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | khangminh22 |
View: | 0 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Is Pan-Africanism Dead?: The Relevancy of Garveyism in the Twenty-First Century: The
Politics of Black Self-Determination in the Southeastern United States
A thesis presented to
the faculty of
the Center for International Studies of Ohio University
In partial fulfillment
of the requirements for the degree
Master of Arts
Bakari K. Lumumba
August 2018
© Bakari K. Lumumba. All Rights Reserved
2
This thesis titled
Is Pan-Africanism Dead?: The Relevancy of Garveyism in the Twenty-First Century: The
Politics of Black Self-Determination in the Southeastern United States
by
BAKARI K. LUMUMBA
has been approved for
the Center for International Studies
by
Loren Lybarger
Associate Professor of Classics and World Religions
Ghirmai Negash
Director, African Studies
Lorna Jean Edmonds
Vice Provost of Global Affairs
3
ABSTRACT
Lumumba, Bakari K., “M.A.,” August 2018 African Studies
Is Pan-Africanism Dead?: The Relevancy of Garveyism in the Twenty-First Century: The
Politics of Black Self-Determination in the Southeastern United States
Director of Thesis: Dr. Loren D. Lybarger
Since the 1960s, Pan-Africanism has steadily lost its currency amongst leaders
and citizens in the African continent and throughout the African Diaspora. During the
past fifty years, Pan-Africanism has suffered a series of seemingly insurmountable
setbacks, including the assassinations of prominent activists and statesmen such as
Patrice Lumumba, Steve Biko, Malcolm X, and Thomas Sankara to name a few.
Furthermore, Pan-Africanism flagship organization the African Union (AU) has had its
fair share of challenges, and criticism leading its detractors to call it a “toothless
bulldog.”
Additionally, the growing disillusionment amongst Africans in the continent and
throughout the Diaspora towards an ideology that has promised so much but delivered so
little has caused Pan-Africanism to be seen as an antiquated model of resistance to global
white hegemony. This stance has also caused many to question the efficacy of the
philosophies and opinions of Marcus Garvey in the age of globalization, in which the
forms of oppression African people face have evolved through sophisticated social
structures that produce contradictory forms of consciousness. Moreover, the pessimistic
undercurrent toward Pan-Africanism that permeates the African world leads one to ask
the question, is Pan-Africanism dead?
4
DEDICATION
To my watoto Amir, Zaina, and Asantewaa for believing in me.
Mimi kupenda sana.
&
To Dr. Boikai S. Twe, Baba Larry Crowe, and Mama Nozipo Glenn for being models of
what a Pan-Africanist is in the twenty-first century.
5
ACKNOWLDEGMENTS
I am forever indebted to Ohio University’s Center for International Studies
African Studies program, the Voinovich School of Leadership & Public Affairs, and Dr.
Lybarger, Dr. Muhammad, and Dr. Houston for their time, effort, diligence, and patience
in helping this thesis become a reality.
To my ancestors who are too numerous to name, thank you for teaching me to
always bet on Black!
6
TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract…………………………………………………………………………………....3 Dedication...…………………………………………………………………………...…..4 Acknowledgements……………………………………………………………………......5 Introduction………………………………………………………………………………..7 Chapter 1…………………………………………………………………………………26 Chapter 2………………………………………………………………………………....43 Chapter 3....……………………………………………………………………………....56 Chapter 4…………………………………………………………………………………72 Bibliography……………………………………………………………………………..79
7
INTRODUCTION
This thesis will critically analyze how and why Pan-Africanism1 has become
associated with an antiquated model of resistance to racism/white supremacy, while also
examining how the philosophies and opinions of Marcus Garvey are as relevant today in
the 21st century as they were during the time of Garvey through the idea of the “alienated
revolutionary.” The alienated revolutionary is one who is cynical about existing power
structures but argues that progressive change can only take place via the use of calculated
acts of instrumental violence.
In 1889 Henry Sylvester Williams, an Afro-Trinidadian barrister, created the
African Association in London, England in partnership with Mrs. E.V. Kinloch, a Black
South African. Williams later coined the term Pan-Africanism2 and attributed doing so to
Mrs. Kinlock whom he heard speak in Britain in 1897, about forced labor in the mines of
South Africa. 3
Williams would subsequently call and lead the first of several Pan-African
conferences in 1900 “to protest the stealing of lands in the African and West Indian
colonies by European powers, racial discrimination and other issues of interest to
Blacks.”4 A young W.E.B. DuBois, played a leading role during the conference, and
drafted a letter to the Queen of England and other rulers of Europe which contained “an
1 Pan-Africanism in this thesis is defined as the concept and conviction that Africans are a distinct people with a distinct historical personality and that they should unite in order to gain the structural capacity to define, defend and develop their own interest as a people. 2 Stylistic Note The terms Pan African, Pan-Africanism, and pan-African are all used interchangeably to reference the social-political, ideological and economic movement that’s advocates solidarity and resistance against oppression for Africans throughout the world. Furthermore, African, Black, African American, people of African descent, are referred to interchangeably, but with due deference to the context involved. 3 Bonita Harris, “Caribbean Women & Pan-Africanism,” African Journal of Political Science New Series 1, no.2 (1996): 257. 4 Tajudeen Abdul Raheem, Pan-Africanism, Economy and Social Change in the Twenty First Century (New York, New York University Press, 1996), 2.
8
appeal to struggle against racism, to grant Black colonies in Africa and the West Indies
the right to responsible government, and demanded
political and other rights to Blacks in the United States.” 5 The document asserted, “‘The
problem of the 20th century is the problem of the color bar.’”6 The conference would
signal a coherent beginning of the Pan-African movement, advocating liberation from
foreign oppression, unity of African people at home and abroad, and the coalescing of
political and economic resources for the benefit of African people. These objectives were
briefly met in some form during the aftermath of the Haitian Revolution, and the
establishment of Haiti as a nation state. During the 1920’s Garvey era its ability to unify
African people domestically and abroad under the cause of African redemption through
organized efforts. Efforts that included, US-based Civil Rights/Black Power movements,
and African Decolonialization/ Independence movements that ended de jure second-class
citizenship in the US and direct European rule in Africa.
Today, however, after 118 years, there is a new clarion call to African people led
by voices such as Tanzanian businessman Ali Mufuruki. Who declared in April of 2015
at the Meles Zenawi lecture series, in the Ethiopian town of Bahir Dar, that “Pan-
Africanism is dead, and that Kwame Nkrumah was no hero.’’ 7Mufuruki presented the
legacy of Nkrumah quite differently from how others have, stating:
I studied the biography of Nkrumah for several weeks to prepare this
lecture. I was first surprised, then disappointed, and petrified about what I
5 Ibid., 2 6 Ibid., 2 7 CORRESPONDENT, SPECIAL. "Kwame Nkrumah Was No Hero, Pan-Africanism Is Dead and Other Stories from a Unique Presidential Meeting." Mail & Guardian Africa. N.p., 21 Apr. 2015. Web. 17 Apr. 2017.
9
found. Like all leaders full of ideals, the father of Ghana’s independence
and Pan-Africanism had his own dark moments. As a matter of fact, the
Pan-Africanist dream still struggles to be fully implemented. Shouldn’t we
consider it ‘dead?8
Moreover, this call is being made outside the halls of academia by a community
that is disenchanted with an idea that has promised so much but produced so little. In the
US this call has been made by Michael Harriot of The Root, an online magazine of
African-American culture, has argued that African Americans are unaware of what Pan-
Africanism is. He asserts that its few remaining acolytes promote an anachronistic
ideology based more on fantasy than reality, championed by economically destitute
African Americans who promote alternative facts and conspiracy theories via Hidden
Colors DVDs. 9 Furthermore, Zimbabwean, journalist and civil activist Vince Musewe,
has also joined the chorus in stating that Pan-Africanism is dead in an article for The
Zimbabwean an online journal for the voiceless, in which he lambasted Pan-Africanism
for its inability to unify African people. Musewe, also cites the history of its acolytes use
of such noble claims as a stepping stone to gain public trust en route to gaining access to
elite positions in society that were formerly held by European colonizers. 10
The statements of Mufuruki, Harriot and Musewe, true or not, speak to the
growing disillusionment among Africans on the continent and throughout the diaspora.
These sentiments support the perspective that Pan-Africanism has promised so much but
delivered so little. During the past fifty years, Pan-Africanism has suffered a series of
8 Ibid. 9 Michael Harriot, “We Fact-Checked Umar Johnson's Hotep Tantrum with Roland Martin Because Someone Had To.” The Root, www.theroot.com, 11 July 2017. 10 Vince Musewe, “Pan-Africanism is dead,” The Zimbabwean, 8 April. 2014.
10
seemingly insurmountable setbacks. Setbacks that, include the assassinations of
prominent activists and statesmen such as Patrice Lumumba, Steve Biko, Malcolm X,
and Thomas Sankara. Pan-Africanism has also faced challenges from the African Union
(AU). Some of the challenges with the AU have been its unwillingness and or inability to
enforce and uphold its referendums to its failure to maintain present national boundaries.
As an example, the creation of the nation-state of South Sudan in 2011. Furthermore, the
AU’s inability to implement numerous initiatives due to lack of funding, continued
international interference in African affairs by the European Union, the United States,
and China has led its detractors to call it a “toothless bulldog.”11
However, in the United States over the past 50 years, Pan-Africanism has made
critical interventions in the movement for Black liberation via the Activist-Intellectual
tradition of resistance through literary force. This practice of literary resistance has
helped keep the idea and concepts of Pan-Africanism alive in academic and intellectual
circles. For example, the Black Power Movement’s promotion of self-determination,
cultural grounding, relevant education, cultural pluralism, and student activism led to the
emergence of Black Studies as a discipline and a movement in 1966 at San Francisco
State College (SFSC), now San Francisco State University (SFSU).12 Dr. Nathan Hare, an
African American sociologist, activist, academic, and psychologist, became the
coordinator of the department in February of 1968. Under Hare’s leadership, the Black
Studies Department at SFSU would inspire the establishment of numerous Black Studies
programs and departments at American colleges and universities and the subsequent
11 Tajudeen Abdul Raheem, Pan-Africanism, Economy and Social Change in the Twenty First Century (New York, New York University Press, 1996), 6. 12 Maulana Karenga, Introduction to Black Studies 4th Edition (Los Angeles, University of Sankore Press, 2010), 12.
11
creation of the first doctoral program in African American Studies at Temple University
in 1992.
Pan-Africanism in the United States would also find grounding in the cultural
thrust promoted by the US Organization under the leadership of Dr. Maulana Karenga.
This organization embraced the call of Malcolm X, Sekou Toure, and Amilcar Cabral for
a cultural revolution to recover the best of African views, values, and practices and use
them to enrich and expand the lives of Black people and enhance their capacity to wage
and win the struggle for liberation.13 The US Organization would also singularly embrace
Malcolm X’s view of culture as expressed in his “Statement of Basic Aims and
Objectives of the Organization of Afro-American Unity,” presented in Harlem on June
28, 1964.14 The statement asserted:
You must have a cultural revolution before the violent revolution…for the
cultural revolution gives identity, purpose, and direction…We must
recapture our heritage and our identity if we are ever to liberate ourselves
from the bonds of white supremacy. We must launch a cultural revolution
to unbrainwash an entire people.15
Malcolm X’s declaration would serve as the basis for the establishment of the US
Organization founded in 1965 in Los Angeles, California under the leadership of Dr.
Maulana Karenga. The organization would consequently adopt Black cultural nationalism
as a mode of resistance to White supremacy while also creating Kawaida philosophy, an
emancipatory philosophy dedicated to cultural revolution, radical social change, and
13 Ibid., 160. 14 Scot Brown, Fighting for US, Maulana Karenga, The US Organization and Black Cultural Nationalism (New York City, New York University Press, 2003), 23. 15 Ibid., 23.
12
bringing good in the world. The organization’s greatest contribution to the Pan-Africanist
struggle is its creation of the Pan-African holiday Kwanzaa in 1966, as a celebration of
family, community, and culture. Today, Kwanzaa is celebrated by more than 40 million
people on every continent in the world.16
The cultural thrust also had an impact on academia via, Dr. Molefi K. Asante’s
book Afrocentricity: The theory of Social Change (1980). Asante’s book started a
discourse around the issue of African agency, and proper place of African peoples’
history. Afrocentricity as an intellectual idea evolved out of and is based on several
fundamental assumptions. First, it assumes that African culture is not only worthy of
study, but critical to understanding society and the human experience, given its key role
in each. Secondly, Afrocentricity or African-centeredness as a methodological orientation
contends that the most effective and fruitful way of studying and understanding African
people is from their own perspective. Finally, Afrocentric theory assumes that if an
African-centered approach is incorrect or of little value, then so is the discipline of Black
Studies, which is based on an equally important assumption that the African experience is
both a valid and valuable subject of study.17
Asante’s Afrocentric initiative would spread beyond the campus to the African
American community, the larger society, and internationally, as well. Furthermore, other
scholars would begin to apply Afrocentrism as an answer to a myriad of issues plaguing
the African American community in academic and social spaces as a popular approach to
African social and human issues. 18
16 Ibid., 160-161. 17 Ibid., 43. 18 Ibid., 40.
13
Paradoxically, Asante’s pre-eminence as the progenitor of contemporary
Afrocentric thought declined in the minds of many due to Dr. Marimba Ani’s massive
text Yuguru: An African-Centered Critique of European Cultural Thought and Behavior
(1994), and her coining of the term MAAFA in her book "Let the Circle Be Unbroken:
The Implications of African Spirituality in the Diaspora" (1998), to describe the history
and ongoing effects of atrocities inflicted on African people. Ani’s treatise Yuguru
captured the ears of many contemporary Afrocentrists, due to her militant critique of
European thought and culture as a tool to promote and maintain white hegemonic rule
throughout the world. Furthermore, Ani’s coining of the term MAAFA in reference to the
atrocities committed against African people has been accepted by many to serve a similar
purpose as the idea of the Holocaust serves to name the distinct Jewish experience of
genocide in Nazi Germany.
Despite the positive cultural impact of the US Organization and of Black cultural
nationalist in the academy, whose work persevered and expanded Black Nationalism and
Afrocentrism has key concepts, Black cultural nationalism has failed to gain a sizeable
following in the African American community. Even with the popularity of
Afrocentricity as a solution to African social and human problems, pan-Africanism’s
thrust in the academic and cultural realms has failed on a macro-level to positively affect
the lives of African Americans who suffer under the vicissitudes of life and the vagaries
of everyday living.
The concepts of Afrocentricity, including cultural nationalism and racial
solidarity, are too abstract for people who confront grinding poverty, illiteracy and
political oppression. While suffering from the residual effects of chattel enslavement and
14
second-class citizenship, African Americans have also had to battle with contemporary
issues, such as the New Jim Crowism19, police misconduct, extrajudicial violence and a
lack of adequate healthcare.
Because of the tendency to intellectualize African American problems, rather than
solve them, pan-Africanism has gone into an abeyance as leaders and citizens in the
African continent and throughout the African Diaspora have sought alternative ways to
deal with the myriad of challenges that confront African life. Alternative modes of
thought such as assimilationism have also failed to bring ideological and organizational
coherence to the effort to achieve social, economic, and political freedom – as well as
equality to the African world.
For example, Dr. Amos Wilson, in his treatise Blueprint for Black Power: A
Moral, Political and Economic Imperative for the Twenty-First Century (2011), speaks to
the weakness of assimilationism, due to its ability to be co-opted by the white power
structure. Wilson argues, that the assimilationist led Civil Rights Movement was
successful in the expansion of Black middle and professional classes as well as markedly
reducing discrimination against Black consumers. The interest overall of Black business
and economic development, however, were not well severed.20 Wilson consequently
regards the assimilationist-led Civil Rights Movement to that of a consumer rights
movement in which the freedom to spend money with white businesses and
establishments became synonymous with political freedom or “1st class” citizenship in
the minds of many African Americans. Additionally, Wilson chides the National
19 Michelle Alexander, The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarnation in the Age of Colorblindness (New York, The New Press, 2012) 20 Amos N. Wilson, Blueprint for Black Power: A Moral, Political, and Economic Imperative of the Twenty-First Century (New York, Afrikan World InfoSystems 1998), 598.
15
Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), Urban League, Southern
Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC), and the institutional Black Church for being
unable to or unwilling to create sociocultural, politico-economic, technological-military
development plans for Black people -- things that are essential to their survival and
advancement. 21
Over more than sixty years after the United States Supreme Court outlawed
segregation of the races in America’s schools, supposedly in the interest of providing
African Americans with “equal education” through racial integration, the majority of
Black students find themselves hyper-segregated in urban ghetto schools, entrapped in an
education system in severe crisis and in imminent danger of total collapse. 22Sixty plus
years after Blacks in Montgomery, Alabama, won the right to ride in the front of the bus,
Blacks in urban America are virtually the only ones along with other forlorn minorities,
riding the buses -- buses to nowhere. Fifty years after gaining the right to vote, having
benefitted from the passage of the great 1964 Voting Rights Act, Blacks in urban and
rural America vote for Black politicians who cannot improve their plight. 23They can vote
for the president of the United States, the only problem being that their urban votes are no
longer crucially influential in determining who will be elected president. Therefore, the
major parties gain political supremacy by running hard against Black images and Black
interest. Forty years after passing fair housing legislation, Blacks are hyper-segregated in
urban ghettos and suburban neighborhoods. Sadly, after sixty plus years of being
America’s moral conscience, Blacks find their communities being devastated by
21 Ibid., 831. 22 Ibid., 827. 23 Ibid., 827.
16
immorality; after preaching brotherly, race-transcending love, they find themselves the
most hated of races. For Blacks in America, fifty years after hearing “Free at last! Free at
last! Thank God Almighty, I’m free at last!” America has become a prison, sealing their
bodies, hopes, and aspiration in dungeons of despair.24
Pan-African thinkers offer a solution to the maladies of Black life in America, in
the form of a nuanced and pragmatic form of Garveyism, by engaging in a critical
analysis of why Pan-Africanism failed in its initial manifestations and why alternatives
have also failed. James Pope in his position paper, Pan-Africanism in the United States:
Identity and Belonging, speaks to the obscure nature of Pan-Africanism in the United
States, due in part to the praxis of Pan-African resistance activity traditionally being
centered on the idea of common struggle against chattel slavery, Jim Crow, Apartheid,
colonialism, and imperialism. Today, these overt forms of marginalization have evolved
through sophisticated social structures that produce contradictory forms of
consciousness.25 This process has undermined one’s sense of sociopolitical, cultural and
economic belonging in the twenty-first century, resulting in a lack of clearly defined
points that would create international solidarity, due to overt oppression being more
subtle and nuanced. 26
Which begs the question, is Pan-Africanism useful today? Is it still a developing
idea? Can it be infused into current social movements against police brutality, racism in
education encapsulated in #Blackoncampus, #BlackLivesMatter and
#ConcernedStudent1950? How does the formation of Pan-African critical consciousness
24 Ibid., 827-828. 25 Olayiwola Abegunrin, Sabella Ogbobode Abidde, Pan-Africanism in Modern Times: Challenge, Concerns, and Constraints (Lanham, Maryland, Lexington Books 2016), 231. 26 Ibid., 107.
17
look today? Can it be cultivated in the growing movements headed by young activists in
an environment that does not have overt institutions of the age of imperialism,
colonialism, Jim Crowism, and South African apartheid?27
Pan-Africanism can be useful today if properly channeled in a nuanced race-first
form, if its adherents move away from a focus on creating social organizations that
exclusively promote Black pride, self-love, and an embrace of African heritage and
history. It can do so by moving toward a pragmatically based focus on obtaining
legitimate political and economic power in U.S. society. To do so requires that its
adherents make the transition from warrior and activist to diplomat, statesmen and
professional using these positions of power and influence to create legitimate spaces of
power for African people to build, develop and maintain rather than only criticize,
deconstruct, and destroy. This necessitates moving away from a crisis-oriented leadership
model that simply responds or reacts to racism to a model that is pre-emptive in nature.
Pan-Africanism must work to build and develop political and economic power to insulate
the Black community from racism, rather than simply responding to it.
This thesis will critically analyze how and why Pan-Africanism has become
associated with an antiquated model of resistance to racism/white supremacy, while also
examining how the philosophies and opinions of Marcus Garvey are as relevant today in
the 21st century as they were during the time of Garvey through the idea of the “alienated
revolutionary.” The alienated revolutionary is one who is cynical about existing power
structures but argues that progressive change can only take place via the use of calculated
27 Ibid., 107.
18
acts of instrumental violence.28 Moreover, the alienated revolutionary reaches the point
of alienation due to their disenchantment with the white power structure and other forms
of Black political resistance to white domination. These forms of resistance fall into four
distinct categories according to John T. McCartney author of Black Power Ideologies: An
Essay in African American Political Thought (1992). The first category, the “political
bargainer,” conforms to the established political process, because he or she can “work
within the two-party system” and has a major goal of “equalizing” opportunities to
produce goods and services. Individuals like Shirley Chisholm, former Representative
Julian Bond of Georgia, former Representative John Conyers of Michigan, and Black
political organizations like the Black Congressional Caucus are “real world” examples of
the political bargainer category. 29 The second category, called the “moral crusader,” is
more interested in “saving the soul of society” than in goods and services, is usually
nonviolent, is not averse to making deals with the status quo, and because of a
willingness to compromise is frequently “open to the charge of being a sell-out.”30
The third category is the “alienated reformer.” The alienated reformer is “cynical
about the possibilities of effecting change through the existing system,” supports the
concepts of Black control of Black communities, and wants a transformation of society,
but one premised on a revitalized Black community. Additionally, the alienated reformer
is also interested in “bread and butter issues” like the political bargainer, but unlike the
28 John T. McCartney, Black Power Ideologies: An Essay in African American Political Thought (Philadelphia, Temple University Press 1992), 112. 29 Ibid., 112. 30 Ibid., 112.
19
latter, is “contemptuous of ‘white middle-class values’” and takes pride in Black culture
worldwide.31
Stokely Carmichael and Chokwe Lumumba at some point in their political careers
started out as adherents of the other approaches. However, traumatic defeats/experiences
(Lumumba learning of the murder of Emmitt Till and Carmichael’s unsuccessful bid to
desegregate the Democratic Party) led them to move to a revolutionary ideology in which
both Black separatism and the idea of a revolutionary transformation of the United States
by any means necessary played a prominent role in their actions.32 For example, the
Student Non-Violent Coordinating Committee (SNCC) began with a moral-crusader
stance in the early 1960s, however, by the late 1960s it moved to a revolutionary
ideology in which both Black Separatism and the idea of revolutionary transformation of
the United States by any means necessary played a prominent role in the organization.33
Malcolm X’s dictum that African Americans had to be ready to resort to armed
self-defense as a means of liberation highlights the important role that violence has in the
self-assertion and psychological liberation of the oppressed. The calculated use of
instrumental violence according to Fanon is an invariable prerequisite to decolonization,
resistance, and freedom from oppression.34 Moreover, violence is a cleansing force that
rids the colonized of their inferiority complex and of their passive and despairing attitude.
Violence, Fanon argues emboldens them and restores their self-confidence. 35 It is
violence, in which self-assertion and self-affirmation manifest that lies at the heart of
31 Ibid., 112. 32 Ibid., 112. 33 Ibid., 113. 34Frantz Fanon: The Wretched of the Earth (New York City, Grove Press, 2004), 1. 35 Ibid., 51.
20
Pan-Africanism, for through the use of violent struggle (the success of the Haitian
Revolution) African people realized that they could free themselves from foreign
domination and take their place among the nations of the world as a free, proud, and
productive people.
The role of the alienated revolutionary and alienated reformer can be seen in the
work of Stokely Carmichael and Chokwe Lumumba, showing that Pan-Africanism in a
nuanced form is still a vibrant, effective ideology for African liberation. It can
accomplish this if it moves away from a focus on creating social organizations that
exclusively promote Black pride, self-love, and an embrace of African heritage and
history, toward a pragmatically based focus on obtaining legitimate political and
economic power in U.S. society. Moreover, the attention placed on Carmichael’s and
Lumumba’s political work and aspirations brings into focus how Pan-African solidarity
leads to the stance of the alienated revolutionary.
Moreover, it is arguable that any contemporary discussion on Pan-Africanism in
the twenty-first century is incomplete without a discussion of Marcus Garvey and
Garveyism for a multitude of reasons. First, Garvey was one of the most well-traveled
Black men of his day, for by the time he had arrived in the United States, on March 23,
1916, the 28-year-old Garvey had already traveled throughout the Caribbean, Central and
South America and Europe, assessing the plight of people of African descent.36 Second,
Garvey was the leading African Diaspora leader of the twentieth century, leading a
movement of more than five million people on every continent. Hence, his popularity and
international appeal allowed him to spread the gospel of Pan-Africanism via his literary
36 Mark Christian, “Marcus Garvey and African Unity: Lessons for the Future from the Past,” Journal of Black Studies 39, no.2 (2008): 328.
21
organ the Negro World. Moreover, his philosophies and opinions would lead to the
creation of many Pan-Africanist organizations inspired by his work, such as the Nation of
Islam (NOI) led by Elijah Muhammad, the African National Pioneer Movement (ANPM)
led by Carlos Cook, the Organization of African American Unity (OAAU) led by
Malcolm X and, the Republic of New Afrika (RNA). Lastly, it has been contended that
even though Garvey was not successful in the 1920s in securing outright victory over
European colonialism, he did lay the foundations for the following generation of African
leaders from the continent and Diaspora to engage in the effective liberation of Africa in
terms of direct Europe rule. However, since the 1960s, there has been limited progress in
securing a viable and sustainable notion and practice of African unity, and efficacious
resistance to foreign oppression (neo-colonialism). 37
What can we learn from Garveyism that is relevant today for Black liberation
theory? Can self-determination be achieved in contemporary Black communities
besieged by self-negation and a quick-fix cultural mentality based on crude materialism?
Is there something from the era of Garveyism that needs to be put in practice in
contemporary Black communities? Garvey scholar and Miami University professor
Mark Christian argues that there is, by keeping Garvey alive in our teaching, studies,
conferences, and publications. There is a hope that Garvey’s message of self-
determination will eventually come into greater practice throughout the African continent
and the African Diaspora.38
37 Ibid., 328. 38 Mark Christian, “Marcus Garvey and the Universal Negro Improvement Association: New Perspectives on Philosophy, Religion, Micro-Studies, Unity, and Practice,” Journal of Black Studies 39, no.2 (2008): 164.
22
Christian might be right, but one of the contributions of this thesis is to point out
that scholarship is not enough. For this reason, the discussion that follows will include a
focus on Black political self-determination in the southeastern United States for several
reason. First, the southeastern United States has the largest population of African
Americans in the U.S., due to it being the point of debarkation for some 400,000 Africans
during the Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade. Therefore, the southeastern U.S. is of vital
importance due to the fact that African Americans are the numerical majority in many
cities and counties throughout the region, thus their prospects of gaining political power
are greater in the southeast than in other regions in which they are outnumbered.
Furthermore, there has been a trend of reverse migration amongst African
Americans, in which after nearly 100 years African Americans are leaving the Midwest
and Northeast to return to the Sunbelt. The attraction of year-round warm weather, the
scarcity of economic opportunities due to deindustrialization, and the effects of
globalization on the Rust Belt has helped spur retirees and Black millennials to take their
chances in a region that their ancestors once fled en masse generations ago.
Chapter 1 briefly reviews the history of Pan-Africanism tracing its origins to the
success of the Haitian Revolution and the creation of the first Black republic in the
Western Hemisphere. This chapter highlights several alienated revolutionaries who
became cynical about existing white hegemonic power structures, arguing that
progressive change can only take place via the use of calculated acts of resistance.39 The
analysis starts during the proto Pan-Africanist era (prior to the 18th century) and ends
with the classical era of Pan-Africanism (18th century to 20th century). Furthermore, this
39 John T. McCartney: Black Power Ideologies: An Essay in African American Political Thought (Philadelphia, Temple University Press 1992), 112.
23
analysis focuses on the development and trajectory of the concept of the alienated
revolutionary, with an emphasis on how it has been used by key charismatic figures in the
movement.
Chapter 2 explores the importance of Marcus Garvey as a principal figure in the
Pan-Africanist movement. Garvey serves as the link between the classical Pan-Africanist
era, and the modern (20th century to the present) era. Furthermore, the philosophies,
opinions, and legacy that Garvey left have been instrumental in spawning numerous Pan-
Africanist organizations and leaders that were inspired by his work and teachings. These
leaders include Kwame Nkrumah, Malcolm X, and Carlos Cook to name a few.
Additionally, this chapter examines the role that Garvey’s ideas have played in
continuing the idea of the alienated revolutionary, through the work of Stokely
Carmichael and Chokwe Lumumba Sr.’s. fight for Black political self-determination in
the southeastern United States.
Chapter 3 examines the early lives and political development of Stokely
Carmichael and Chokwe Lumumba Sr., which includes Carmichael’s work with the
Lowndes County Freedom Organization (LCFO). The chapter then explores his attempt
to organize the Black citizens of Lowndes, to create their own political party and elect
Black public officials in the Black majority county, while also analyzing how the former
Vice President of the Republic of New Afrika (RNA), Chokwe Lumumba Sr., was able to
successfully become mayor of Jackson, Mississippi. Moreover, emphasis on
Carmichael’s LCFO and Lumumba’s successful mayoral bid are important because it
models the possibilities that open up when Pan-Africanism and the alienated
revolutionary stance are embraced. This success can be replicated if Pan-Africanism is
24
practiced in a nuanced version congruent with 21st century global realities in which local,
national, and international economics are linked due to the advance in technology.
Chapter 4 ends my analysis, by reflecting on the success of Chokwe Lumumba
Sr.’s pragmatic Pan-Africanism as Mayor of Jackson, Mississippi, and his use of
legitimate political power as part of the American democratic system of governance to
help a majority Black city transition from possible state trusteeship to a city on the road
to recovery and redevelopment. This chapter also examines the continuation of his work
through his son, Choke Lumumba Jr., who successfully became Mayor of Jackson,
Mississippi in July of 2017. Ultimately, Carmichael’s LCFO and Lumumba’s successful
mayoral bid demonstrates the continuing relevance of Pan-Africanism and the
revolutionary alienation that it leads to. Their political maturity and militant stance
against white oppression, led to them embracing third-party politics and eschewing the
two-party platform as a way to empower Blacks via the ballot box. Moreover,
Carmichael and Lumumba stance of alienated revolution via the ballot box offers a more
nuanced range of alternatives beyond revolutionary violence. The stance of the alienated
revolutionary constitutes an active refusal to work within white power structures. It is a
decision to emphasize black solidarity and to assert oneself in terms of this solidarity.
The means of this assertion are not always violent even if the response from white power
structures might very well be violent. Black self-assertion can make use of the
instruments of democratic action and economic self-sufficiency. The alienated
revolutionary can also take other forms such as that of the “alienated” statesman,
diplomat, and professional. Thus, the alienated statesmen is one who prescribes to the
ideas of Pan-Africanism, while seeking political office/power outside of the two-party
26
Chapter 1
The origins of Pan-Africanism
“Every people should be originators of their own destiny.”40
Martin Robison Delany
Dr. Ali Mazrui, a Kenyan political scientist, argued in his book The Africans: A
Triple Heritage that “one of the great ironies of modern African history is that it took
European colonialism to inform Africans that they were Africans. 41If such a sentiment is
true, one can say that it took Africans being ruthlessly exported by the millions as slaves
to the Western hemisphere to create the foundation and struggle for the unity of African
people throughout the world. The ideological and social movement known as Pan-
Africanism would become the impetus for that struggle. The core of Pan-Africanism was
its insistence on African self-assertion and liberation from chattel enslavement;
correspondingly, a revolutionary alienation from, and a refusal of, hegemonic white
power would also take place. This refusal and alienation is the common, essential
element in every form that Pan-Africanism takes at different points in time.
According to Dr. Wilson Jeremiah Moses, the ideology of Pan-Africanism has
gone through several phases: starting with the proto Pan-Africanist era’s42 drive for self-
determination in the 1600s; moving on to the success of the Haitian Revolution at the
turn of the 19th century; to its flourishing in the 1850s, its eclipse in the 1870s, and its
renewal and apex in the Garvey movement; to its feeble recrudescence in the 1960s to
40 Martin Kilson, A.Cromwell Hill, Apropos of Africa: Sentiments of Negro American Leaders on Africa from the 1800s to the 1950s (New York City, Routledge, 2014), 22. 41 Ali A. Mazrui, The Africans: A Triple Heritage (Boston, Little, Brown & Company 1986), 99. 42 Wilson Jeremiah Moses, The Golden Age of Black Nationalism, 1850-1925 (New York, Oxford University Press, 1978), 25.
27
today.43 The proto Pan-Africanist era is readily identifiable due to the creation of the
Brazilian republic of Palmares in the 1600s. It can also be seen among the enslaved
Africans who managed to gain their freedom by taking refuge in “Maroons societies,”
creating autonomous communities of resistance to white hegemony and enslavement in
Jamaica, Brazil, and Suriname.44 Maroon communities are known to have existed in
North America as well, particularly in Florida where Africans seeking freedom and a
reprieve from the indignities of chattel enslavement linked their destinies to those of the
Seminoles.45
The classical era of Pan-Africanism was based primarily in the United States.
Among the principal spokespersons were African Americans, Martin Delany, Bishop
Henry McNeal Turner, James T. Holly and Anna Julia Cooper; the West Indian, Edward
Wilmot Blyden; and the West African, Africanus Horton.46 Their works culminated with
Henry Sylvester Williams coining the term Pan-Africanism in the late 1890’s, as well as
organizing the first Pan-African conference in London in 1900. The conference was
organized with the assistance of Alexander Walters, who was a leader of Blacks in the
United States and a Bishop in the African Methodist Episcopal Zion Church.47
Most historians, however –particularly Dr. Robert Johnson Jr., place the genesis
of Pan-Africanism on the tiny Caribbean island of Hispaniola. Dr. Johnson states “the
desire to re-connect with ancestral and traditional ties found expression in the drums of
43Wilson Jeremiah Moses, Classical Black Nationalism: From the American Revolution to Marcus Garvey (New York, New York University Press 1996), 6. 44 Ibid., 6. 45 Ibid., 6. 46 Wilson Jeremiah Moses, The Golden Age of Black Nationalism, 1850-1925 (New York, Oxford University Press, 1978), 18. 47Ibid.,19.
28
the African in Hispaniola, and in his/her militant resistance to slavery and separation
from Africa.”48
Consequently, Pan-Africanism found its birth in the nineteenth century in the
Haitian Revolution. The successful rebellion of so called primitive Africans against the
modern French military under the leadership of one of the greatest military minds the
world has ever known, Napoleon Bonaparte, ushered in a new era of African-national
sufficiency. As a result, Independent Haiti became not only a symbol of defiance,
achievement, and hope, but also a clear signal to Africans struggling against European
hegemony throughout the world. Haiti’s victory demonstrated that through armed
resistance, Africans could claim their rightful place among the nations of the world.49
Therefore, it is of no coincidence that the Haitian Revolution began at the
grassroots level with a proclamation and affirmation of their African spirit. Under Dutty
Boukman’s leadership, enslaved Africans gathered in the forest on August 22, 1791 to
swear allegiance to one another. They swore that they would never submit to the colonist
again and that they would fight to the death to prevent others from suffering the
deprivation and punishment that came from slavery.50 The great Pan-African Marxist
scholar, C.L.R James, explained in graphic detail in The Black Jacobins: Toussaint
L’Ouverture and the San Domingo Revolution, the ruthless and immoral form of
punishment that many slaves had to endure:
Whipping was interrupted with pepper, citron, cinders, aloes, and hot ashes
were poured on the bleeding wounds. Mutilations were common limbs,
48 Robert Johnson Jr., Returning Home: A Century of African-American Repatriation (Trenton, New Jersey, Asmara, Eritrea, African World Press, Inc., 2005), 1. 49 Ibid., 1. 50 Ibid.,.12.
29
ears, and sometimes the private parts, to deprive them of the pleasures
which they could indulge in without expense. Their masters poured burning
wax on their arms and hands and shoulders, emptied the boiling cane sugar
over their heads, burned them alive, roasted them in slow fires, filled them
with gunpowder and blew them up with a match; buried them up to the neck
and smeared their heads with sugar that the flies might devour them;
fastened them near to nests of ants or wasps; made them eat their excrement,
drink their urine, and lick the salvia of other slaves. One colonist was known
in moments of anger to throw himself on his slaves and stick his teeth into
their flesh.51
Given the depravity of the cruelty the slaves endured they believed they were
fighting against demonic forces and therefore called upon the divine to assist them in
their quest for freedom, justice, and liberation. Boukman encouraged his compatriots by
stating:
Our god who is good to us orders us to revenge our wrongs. He will direct
our arms and aid us. Throw away the symbol of the god of the whites who
has so often caused us to weep and listen to the voices of liberty which
speaks in the hearts of us all.52
Boukman’s declaration and the subsequent victory over the French showed the
power that the memory and spirit of Africa has amongst her displaced progeny.
51 C.L.R James, The Black Jacobins: Toussaint L’Ouverture and the San Domingo Revolution (New York City, Vintage Books, 1989), 12-13. 52 Robert Johnson, Jr, Returning Home: A Century of African-American Repatriation (Trenton, New Jersey, Asmara, Eritrea, African World Press, Inc., 2005), 12.
30
Consequently, Pan-Africanism spread throughout the western world and to Africa,
through slave revolts, political and economic organizations, and repatriation to Africa.
Sadly, in the centuries since the revolution, Haiti has gone from being considered
the ‘Pearl of the Caribbean,’ to the poorest country in the Western Hemisphere, due to
political corruption, debt, poor financial management, political instability, and the US
invasion and occupation of Haiti in 1915. This occupation led to the restructuring of the
Haitian political economy following the assassination of Haitian president Vilburn
Guillaume Sam.53 Sadly, the circumstances in Haiti would serve as a harbinger of the
challenges of Black self-governance for many Caribbean and African nations upon
acquiring independence.
Despite this devolution into corrupt post-independence rule, the Haitian
revolution constituted a militant example of the revolutionary alienation that came to
characterize Pan-Africanism. Haiti’s message was one of Black self-reliance and
empowerment paired with a violent rejection of white colonial power. The violence,
however, was merely the reflection and response to the violence of enslavement. Self-
assertion inevitably provoked an intensification of the colonial violence that aimed to
reinforce white dominance. Black Haitian victory, achieved at a terrible price in the face
of overwhelming odds, would become the animating spirit for later proto-Pan-Africanists
struggling against slavery in the continental United States. Alienated revolution could
succeed; Haiti had proved it.
53 Philippe Girard, Haiti: The Tumultuous History-From Pearl of the Caribbean to Broken Nation (New York City, PALGRAVE MACMILLAN,2010), 76-79.
31
Pan-Africanism Before Marcus Garvey
The period from 1787 to 1817 is often referred to as the period of proto-Pan-
Africanism.54 These years were marked by the Haitian Revolution and the emergence of
abolitionist writing by Diasporan Blacks. Among them were the works of Olaudah
Equiano (Gustavus Vassa), Otto Cugano, and Ignatius Sancho, all former slaves
concerned with the plight of African people.55 Although Equiano, Cugano, and Sancho
were not Pan-Africanist in the formal sense,56 their use of literature ushered in an era in
which Diasporan Blacks used written language as a means of expressing their discontent
and dismay with the institution of chattel enslavement and the Trans-Atlantic Slave
Trade. Such activities by Diasporan Blacks countered the widely held notion that Blacks
were not sentient beings, while serving as templates in the use of narratives for the works
of prominent abolitionist figures like Harriet Tubman, Fredrick Douglass, Solomon
Northup, and Harriet Jacobs to promote the abolitionist cause. Furthermore, the works of
Equiano and Cugano also served as the precursors to Pan-African literary organs such as
The North Star by Martin Delany, The Negro World by Marcus Garvey, and The West
African Pilot by Nnamdi Azikiwe.
Paul Cuffe: The First Expatriate (1759-1817). Pan-Africanism in nineteenth
century America, under the auspices of voluntary reintegration of Africans into Africa,
began seven years after the Haitian Revolution through the work of a prominent, self-
54 Wilson Jeremiah Moses, The Golden Age of Black Nationalism, 1850-1925 (New York, Oxford University Press, 1978), 25. 55 Ibid., 26. 56 A case can be made that Equiano, Cugano, and Sancho were Pan-Africanist, due to their understanding of race based inequality, discrimination, slavery, and their fervent denunciation of it. Furthermore, they organized themselves into a Black quasi-literary abolitionist group. Such a case has been made by Francis and Barry Sanders Adams in their book, Three Black Writers in Eighteenth Century England (1971), and Sandra Burr, Adam Potkay, Suzanne Rintoul treatise, Black Atlantic Writers of the Eighteenth Century: Living the New Exodus in England and the Americas (1995).
32
made businessman named Paul Cuffe. Cuffe began planning a voyage to Africa that
would both repatriate free Africans to the continent and establish commerce between
Africans on the continent and those in America.57 By contemporary standards, Cuffe
would be defined as a Black economic separatist. Regardless of such contemporary
labels, Cuffe was a unique man. One of only a few African Americans to have never
known slavery at the time. Cuffe was born to an African father and a Native American
mother on January 17, 1759 in New Bedford (Westport) Massachusetts.58 Furthermore,
Cuffe was a member of a large group of free Africans who happened to be mulattoes born
of either mixed African and Indian parentage or African and European descent.
One means of acquiring freedom was through voluntary manumission. As some
plantation owners specified in their wills that certain slaves who had served them well,
should be freed upon their death. Other slaves obtained freedom by assisting slave-
owners in maintaining order and the status quo on the plantation. For example, the
Commonwealth of Virginia gave a slave his freedom in 1700 for discovering a plot by
other slaves to rebel.59 Nevertheless, this act of manumission was an aberration; for soon
after, the Virginia legislature passed an act in 1723 that no private slave-owner could free
his slaves. This law was passed to protect the thriving economic enterprises involving
tobacco and cotton. The public policymakers realized that without slave labor, these
thriving industries could experience a severe recession if the plantation owners had to pay
for the labor of African people. Slavery was essential to the continued economic vitality
57 Ibid., 20. 58 Ibid., 20. 59E. Franklin Frazier, The Negro in the United States (New York, Asmara, Eritrea, Macmillan, 1971), 60.
33
of the south.60 Cuffe, despite the restriction upon African labor, educated himself and
soon developed an interest in commerce and shipping while being employed on a
whaling ship. 61
Cuffe, only five years after his maiden voyage on a whaler, began to build his
own ships. It took six years to build one large ship, two brigs, and several smaller boats.
62 In 1810, Cuffe had amassed enough money to captain his own ship, with a Black crew.
Cuffe sailed to Philadelphia and ultimately Sierra Leone, where he would investigate the
possibility of African resettlement and commerce. Cuffe became the first African
American of record to successfully return to Africa. Furthermore, Cuffe did not simply
return, for he began to share many of the skills he obtained in America with his
continental African brothers and sisters. Cuffe, as a Christian, was motivated by a spirit
of evangelism which led to criticism that he was simply seeking to “civilize” indigenous
Africans through Christianity. Yet, that is not completely true; yes, Cuffe, as many
African Americans who had taken on the Christian religion, carried a sense of moral
superiority over traditional African religious practices. However, this must be taken into
context, due to the fact that during the nineteenth century, all knowledge of Africa came
from Europeans. Thus, all information disseminated featured a racist slant to uphold
negative stereotypes about Africa and its inhabitants as sub-human brutes who could only
be civilized through the institution of slavery. Cuffe was an unfortunate recipient of the
mis-educational climate.
60 Robert Johnson Jr., Returning Home: A Century of African-American Repatriation (Trenton, New Jersey, Asmara, Eritrea, African World Press, Inc., 2005), 20-21. 61 Ibid., 21. 62 George Padmore, Pan-Africanism or Communism (London, Dennis Dobson, 1985), 45.
34
Nonetheless, Cuffe’s concern with the physical well-being of Africans in both
Africa and America and his epistle of the Society of Sierra Leone stand as testaments to
his willingness to affirm a Pan-African kinship amongst Africans in America and
Africa.63 Regardless of the criticism leveled at Cuffe for his intentions upon reaching
Sierra Leone, what we do know is that Cuffe’s trip to Sierra Leone signaled the beginning
of a history of African American repatriation and the emergence of the American
Colonization Society (ACS).
Cuffe introduced a new aspect of what later would become Pan-Africanist
revolutionary alienation. Where Haiti modeled a violent alienation from white power,
Cuffe pioneered a type of voluntary self-alienation through migration away from the
centers of white power and toward Africa itself. Cuffe did this despite retaining a view of
African religions as inferior to Christianity. Even as he turned away from white
domination he nevertheless carried elements of it within him in the form of his religious
prejudice. Nevertheless, his turning toward Africa was significant. Haiti fought white
power; Cuffe turned away from it. Both acts constituted a rejection of white power and an
act of alienation from it.
The Classical Era 1850-1925
The classical era of Pan-Africanism arguably reached its fullest expression in the
years between 1850 to 1925. As a movement, it was defined as the effort of primarily
African Americans to create a sovereign nation state and an ideological basis for a
concept of national culture.64 Ironically, the ideas of nineteenth century Pan-Africanists
63Robert Johnson, Jr., Returning Home: A Century of African-American Repatriation (Trenton, New Jersey, Asmara, Eritrea, African World Press, Inc., 2005), 23. 64 Wilson Jeremiah Moses, Classical Black Nationalism: From the American Revolution to Marcus Garvey (New York, New York University Press, 1996), 2.
35
typically resembled those of upper-class Europeans and White Americans, rather than
native African or African American peoples.65 Thus, the nationalism of prominent Pan-
Africanists such as Alexander Crummell and Marcus Garvey was situated in a “high
culture” aesthetic that venerated symbols of imperial power, military might, and
aristocratic refinement,66 while also being enamored with the concepts of uplifting and
“civilizing” the race. As a result, Pan-Africanists of the time defined their mission as a
movement for “African civilization.” Such sentiments of course reflect the prevailing
narrative of the time, for it isn’t until the post-Garvey era in which Pan-Africanists begin
to ascribe to a kinder view of Africa due to the influences of twentieth century
anthropology, which tended to idealize African village life, sentimentalize the rural south,
and romanticize the urban ghetto.67
David Walker (1796-1830). David Walker, a free born African American (due
to his mother being free, his father was a slave), was an outspoken abolitionist, writer,
and anti-slavery activist who used his freedom to advance the cause of his enslaved
brothers and sisters. Walker used his publication Walker’s Appeal to the Coloured
Citizens of the World, to speak out against racism/white supremacy and the treatment of
African people around the world. Consequently, Walker’s book perturbed plantation
owners as he spoke out against the motives of the American Colonialization Society
(ACS) and the institution of southern slavery. In his book, Walker delineates the causes
of what he terms African “wretchedness”: 1. Slavery, 2. Ignorance, 3.The preachers of
65 Ibid., 3. 66 Ibid., 3. 67 Ibid., 3.
36
the religion of Jesus Christ, and 4. The Colonizing Plan.68 Of these four causes, Walker
specifically attacked “the colonizing plan” in which he condemned former Secretary of
State and Speaker of the House, Henry Clay, who argued for the resettlement of
“colored” people to Africa to bring “the arts, civilization, and Christianity.”69Walker, in
the spirit and memory of Africa, distinguished the God of African people from that of
European-Americans, believing that his God would avenge the wrongs done to them by
slave owners. Walker’s work, addressed to “the colored citizens of the world,”
presupposed that Black people everywhere were morally bound to revolt against their
common heritage of oppression.70 Such an audacious declaration is a clear example of
militant Pan-Africanism, due to Walker’s support of violence as a way to overcome
global white hegemony. Sadly, Walker suffered a mysterious death in Boston in 1830,
one year before the Nat Turner slave rebellion.
Walker’s resistance to hegemonic white rule is reflective of the Haitian model of
violent revolt, not Cuffe’s model of self-alienation via repatriation, but he also
demonstrates a principled use of his freedom to advocate for enslaved Africans. He
actively placed himself in solidarity with slaves and argued against forced repatriation to
Africa through the use of literature.
Alexander Crummell (1819-1898). Alexander Crummell was a revolutionary
African American minister and academic who studied at Cambridge University, where he
developed concepts of Pan-Africanism. In 1853 Crummell emigrated to Liberia, due to a
68 Robert Johnson, Jr., Returning Home: A Century of African-American Repatriation (Trenton, New Jersey, Asmara, Eritrea, African World Press, Inc., 2005), 52. 69 David Walker, David Walker’s Appeal to the Coloured Citizens of the World (New York, Hill and Wang, 1965), 64. 70 Wilson Jeremiah Moses: Classical Black Nationalism: From the American Revolution to Marcus Garvey (New York, New York University Press 1996), 15.
37
desire to bring up his children “under Black men’s institutions.”71 Crummell regularly
spoke of the duties that African Americans had to their ancestral home, leading many to
perceive Crummell as an elitist. Nonetheless, Crummell hoped to promote in Liberia a
political economy like that of England and the United States. However, to do so,
Crummell believed (as did many Pan-Africanist of his era) that European culture must
first be brought to Africa. Such thinking caused him to favor Christianity and the English
language as a means of “civilizing” West Africa.72 Crummell was unable to create the
Liberian society he envisioned and returned to the United States in 1873, working
tirelessly until his death in 1898 to support Pan-Africanist organizations.
Crummell’s version of alienated revolution coincides with that of Cuffe’s, model
of voluntary alienation through repatriation to Africa; but he also creates organizations,
which is something new. When the Liberia project fails, he builds Pan-African structures
in the US. Crummell’s actions show that it is not enough to simply fight or turn away
from white power; one must also create the organizational foundation of Black
independence. Moreover, Crummell’s version of alienated revolution embodies the idea
of a nation builder by creating organizations that serve the African American community.
This idea of nation building will be embraced by subsequent Pan-Africanist as well.
Martin R. Delaney (1812-1885). Martin Roberson Delany is considered by many
to be the father of Black Nationalism. Delany, the grandson of an African prince was also
an abolitionist, journalist, physician, writer, and one of the first three African Americans
admitted to Harvard Medical School. His dismissal from Harvard on racial grounds
71 Ibid., 21. 72 Ibid., 22.
38
motivated Delany to become an active emigrationist.73 In 1852, Delany published The
Condition, Elevation, Emigration, and Destiny of the Colored People of the United
States, in which he like his Pan-Africanist contemporaries viewed colored people as
powerless, and the objects of pity the world over.74 To remedy this condition, Delany
urged Blacks to observe how whites have raised “massive buildings,” launched swift
vessels, “with their white sheets spread to the winds of heaven,” built railroads “flying
with the velocity of the swallow.” 75 Delany’s sentiments stung worse than African
honeybees, and he proposed a vigorous program of self-help, while also considering the
prospects of emigration to Canada. Delany would eventually move his family to Canada
in 1856, due to the passing of the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850.
Delaney’s form of alienated revolution would serve as a hybrid of Cuffe’s
revolutionary alienation and Crummell’s nation building, in which Delaney advocated
repatriation to Africa and emigration to Canada after the passing of the Fugitive Slave
Act, while also founding the abolitionist newspaper the North Star. Moreover, Delaney
did this despite seeing whites as the standard barriers of contemporary civilization even
though he advocated Black-self-rule.
Bishop Henry McNeal Turner (1834-1915). Bishop Henry McNeal Turner was
a minister, politician, and the 12th elected Bishop of the African Methodist Episcopal
(AME) Church.76 In 1892, the American Colonization Society (ACS) ceased its active
involvement in Liberia. As a result, the militant and charismatic Henry McNeal Turner of
73 Ibid., 22. 74 Ibid., 23. 75 Ibid., 23. 76 Robert Johnson, Jr, Returning Home: Why Blacks Left America For Africa: Interviews with Black Repatriates, 1971-1999, (Westport, Connecticut, Praeger, 1999), xv.
39
the AME church assumed the call for African American repatriation. Turner, like many
African Americans bitter from the lack of promise that came after the Civil War, turned
to developing organizations to address the plight of African Americans after being
abandoned by the federal government and northern carpetbaggers.77 Consequently,
Turner (along with others) created the Kansas African Emigration Association (KAEA)
and the Liberia Exodus Company (LEC), which was founded by Turner and Martin
Delany. The latter organization bought a ship and transported two hundred Blacks to
Liberia.78 Because of the influence of Martin Delany and Alexander Crummell, Turner
came to his own conclusion on the issue of the African condition in America and
repatriation. He wrote:
The Negro race has as much chance in the U.S. … of being a man as a frog
has in a snake den…. Emigrate and gradually return to the land of our
ancestors…The Negro was brought here in the prudence of God to learn
obedience, to work, to sing to pray, to preach, to acquire education, deal
with mathematical abstractions and imbibe the principles of civilization as
a whole and then return to Africa, the land of his fathers, and bring her his
millions.79
Turner’s summation of the political, social, and economic conditions African
Americans faced, coupled with the violent reign of terror that African Americans were
subjected to, led Turner to advocate for emigration to Africa. Perplexingly, Turner held
many of the same beliefs about why Africans were enslaved and transported to the
77 Ibid., xv. 78 Ibid., xv. 79 Ibid., xv.
40
western world as racist whites. Consequently, showing once again, that during the
nineteenth century Africans in the diaspora learned a large amount of their history and the
culture of their ancestors from whites.
Turner’s variation of alienated revolution was multifaceted like Delaney, in which
he advocated for revolutionary alienation, as well as nation building, while bringing the
concept of Black theological nationalism to the forefront of Pan-African movement.
Turner’s assertion that God is a Negro, would help pave the way for Black Liberation
Theology and further development of Black theological nationalism, though the Nation of
Islam, and the Shrine of the Black Madonna via the Pan-African Orthodox Church.
Henry Sylvester Williams (1869-1911). Henry Sylvester Williams was an Afro-
Trinidadian barrister often recognized as the father of Pan-Africanism, a title he shares
with the West Indian educator, writer, diplomat, and politician Edward Wilmot Blyden. I
have chosen to record the work of Williams in this treatise due him coining the term Pan-
Africanism and his creation of the initial Pan-African conference in 1900 in London,
England that led to the subsequent DuBois led congresses.
Williams, as with other prominent West Indians of his day, was a well-travelled
man, who after studying in Canada, went to England where he studied law.80 In 1897,
Williams founded the Pan-African Association with the purpose of lobbying on behalf of
Africa, due to his concern with the scramble for Africa and the South African situation.81
At the turn of the 20th century, Williams convened the first ever Pan-African conference,
in which some 30 delegates assembled from the Caribbean, North America, Europe, and
80 Tony Martin, The Pan-African Connection: From Slavery to Garvey and Beyond (Dover, Massachusetts, The Majority Press, 1983), 11. 81 Ibid., 12.
41
Africa. They discussed how they could unite the African world into a strong body that
would fight on behalf of Africa and rescue Africa from the grips of European
hegemony.82
After the conference, Williams toured the West Indies, visiting his native Trinidad
and Jamaica, founding several branches of the Pan-African Association.83 In 1903,
Williams emigrated to South Africa, due to his concern with the South African situation.
During his stay in South Africa he became the first Black to practice law in the country,
until he returned to Trinidad dying in 1911.84
Williams’s version of alienated revolution, can be found in his ability to develop
the Pan-African idea at a philosophical level through his creation of the first Pan-African
conference. Furthermore, Turner’s advocacy for African people as an barrister, situated
him as an alienated professional, in which he would fight white power in the courtroom,
not the battlefield as did his Haitian brethren.
The early fight against global white supremacy, led by proto and classical era
Pan-Africanists, such as Paul Cuffe, Alexander Crummell, David Walker, and Henry
Sylvester Williams, while unsuccessful in its initial manifestation shaped the idea of the
alienated revolutionary. Through the idea of revolutionary alienation, proto and classical
era Pan-Africanist militancy and violent rejection of white domination; voluntary
repatriation to Africa in an act of turning away from white domination and toward
independence in Africa itself; rejection of repatriation in favor of enacting the Haitian
model in the U.S.; building organizational self-sufficiency both in African and in the US;
82 Ibid., 12. 83 Ibid., 12. 84 Ibid., 12.
42
would help the shape the Pan-African idea. Moreover, despite these breakthroughs
toward alienated revolution, the transformation was not complete, since many early era
Pan-Africanists had absorbed white racist attitudes of cultural superiority toward Africa
and Africans. The issue of cultural superiority and white racist attitudes would dissipate
through the work of Marcus Garvey and his creation of the Universal Negro
Improvement Association (UNIA). The following chapter discusses the life, work and
legacy of Marcus Garvey.
43
Chapter 2 Look for me in the Whirlwind
The Life, and Legacy of Marcus Garvey
“Garvey was the first man of color to lead and develop a mass movement. He was the
first man on a mass scale and level to give millions of Negroes a sense of dignity and
destiny, and make the Negro feel he was somebody.”85
Rev, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Jamaica 1965
The world that Marcus Garvey entered at the turn of the 20th century was a far cry
from the African world that his Pan-African predecessors dreamed of. Nineteenth century
Pan-Africanist efforts, which focused on racial uplift, Christian evangelicalism, and
European cultural indoctrination, failed to palpably change the conditions of African
people the world over living under global white supremacist rule. Adding to the African’s
global quagmire were several seminal events that would take place during Garvey’s
formative years. First, the Berlin Conference of 1885 convened to officially parcel Africa
out to European colonial powers. Second, the U.S Supreme court case of Plessy v.
Ferguson of 1896, stripped African Americans of their citizenship, while also persevering
separate but equal segregation. Lastly, beginning in 1885, King Leopold of Belgium,
began his reign of terror over the Congolese people, taking the Congo as his own
personal possession while committing an act of genocide against the Congolese people
that would wipe out half of its population by 1908.
Garvey, upon entering the U.S. in 1916, would initially subscribe to the
accommodationist politics of Booker T. Washington, believing that racial uplift would
85 Olayiwola Abegunrin, Sabella Ogbobode Abidde, Pan-Africanism in Modern Times: Challenges, Concerns, and Constraints (London, Lexington Books, 2016), 277.
44
come through practical and achievable economic means.86 However, Garvey would
subsequently turn toward Pan-Africanism and the role of the “alienated revolutionary”
during his fund raising tour across the U.S for his Jamaican Farm and Industrial Institute.
In which he witnessed firsthand the debilitating and psychologically crippling conditions
that Jim Crowism had on African Americans in the south.87 “In embracing the stance of
alienated revolutionary, Garvey drew not only on the Haitian model of militant
resistance, but also on the models of African repatriation and Black organization building
that proto-Pan-Africanists had pioneered in the 19th Century. Garvey’s unique synthesis
of these different modes of alienation and resistance created a new model and inspiration
for alienated revolution for later figures such as Martin Luther King, Malcolm X and, as
we will see, Stokely Carmichael and Chokwe Lumumba. Specifically, Garvey’s synthesis
of Black economic nationalism, audacious and flamboyant rejection of the white power
structure, would serve as catalyst for the resurgence of the Pan-African idea, while
unifying the African world in the belief of African redemption though the concept of One
God, One Aim, One Destiny.
Early Life of Marcus Garvey
Marcus Mosiah Garvey Jr., was born August 17th, 1887 in St. Ann’s Bay,
Jamaica to Sarah and Marcus Garvey. Of his eleven siblings only, Marcus and his older
sister Indiana lived past childhood. The elder Marcus Garvey was a descendant of the
Maroons,88 as well as a master stone mason, who was a lover of books of which he
86 Colin Grant, Negro with A Hat: The Rise and Fall of Marcus Garvey (New York City, Oxford University Press, 2008), 69. 87 Ibid., 82-83. 88 The Maroons were a community of African runaways who created autonomous communities that often served as bases for raids on white settlements. Many communities were guarded by palisades and elaborately constructed defenses, including disguised paths, false trials that sometimes led into quicksand, and booby traps. Before 1700, Maroon communities were generally led by men who had been born in Africa: many claimed they had been kings in
45
owned a vast number.89 Garvey’s mother was the business anchor of the Garvey family.
She along with one of her brothers owned an allotment of land in which they grew
pimentos and citrus fruits which they sold in the local market. From such an endeavor a
young Marcus Garvey learned industry, while physical strength and a love of reading
derived from his father. 90
After a series of financial setbacks due to a hurricane that wiped out the Garvey
family crops. Marcus decided to move to Kingston where with the assistance of a
maternal uncle, Garvey secured employment at Benjamin Printery, where he became the
youngest foreman in the history of the trade at the relatively young age of just 18 years
old.91 It was from here that a young Garvey’s political views would take shape.
Beginning in participating in the first trade union to be formed on the island, known as
the Printers’ Union, Garvey out of sympathy joined his colleagues on the picket line.
However, after dabbling in organizing for social uplift, Garvey was left penniless.
Without a means of livelihood, Garvey left for Costa Rica to work for the United Foods
Company (now multinationals Chiquita and Dole). Upon arriving in Costa Rica, Garvey
was employed as a time keeper in which he observed the deadly work conditions in
which Blacks toiled. Costa Rica was rife with disease-infested swamps and roads that
were deathtraps, where bandits preyed upon workers, robbing them and often hacking
them to death.92 Garvey of course, was repulsed by the site of the conditions in which his
their homeland. After 1700, Maroon leaders were often Creoles familiar with both the ways of whites and with African practices. There were Maroon communities in Brazil, Colombia, The Guianas, Jamaica, Mexico, Panama, and in the United States in which they were known as black towns. Maroon societies show that throughout the African diaspora Africans never acquiesced to the suffering and degradation slavery but fought for the lives, freedom, and humanity despite the odds being stacked against them. 89 Amos Wilson, Afrikan-Centered Consciousness Versus the New World Order: Garveyism in the Age of Globalism (New York, Afrikan World InfoSystems,1999), 15. 90 Ibid., 15-16. 91 Ibid., 16. 92 Ibid., 16.
46
people lived. He protested upon the seat of the British consul to help Blacks. The counsel
response was blunt to say the least “if they don’t like it here, they can leave.” In this
incident, Garvey learned a brutal lesson in the value that Black life has in the eyes of
whites. Consequently, Garvey once again tried his hand at social activism and organizing,
by starting a series of papers to address the plight of the Black workers. These
newspapers, La Nacion and La Prensa, sought to unite Black workers to fight for better
conditions and higher pay. However, due to dwindling resources and worker fear and
apathy little became of his efforts.
Garvey subsequently travelled to England in 1912 to broaden his perspectives.
He attended lectures at Berbeck College and The University of London and spoke at the
famous “Speakers Corner.” While in London, Garvey secured employment with Duse
Mohamed Ali, a Sudanese Egyptian who was a brilliant scholar, propagandist, and world
traveler who agitated for African independence.93 Ali became a mentor to Garvey,
enlightening him on Africa’s rich history and its vast mineral wealth, as well as
continuing brutalities of the Arab Slave Trade and how Islam came to dominate much of
Northern Africa.
Consequently, Garvey returned to Jamaica in June of 1914 with visions of
enterprise. On August 1st, 1914, Garvey founded the Universal Improvement and Negro
Conservation Association and African Communities League.94 The association was
founded on the first of August because the date marked the anniversary of the abolition of
93 Ibid., 16. 94 It is unclear when Garvey omitted “Conservation” from the title. However, some time before he left for the US this was done.
47
African enslavement in the British West Indies.95 Unfortunately, after a year of
organizing in Kingston, Garvey’s following had only amounted to about 100 people.
Subsequently, in 1916 Garvey travelled to the United States to visit Booker T.
Washington after reading Washington’s autobiography Up from Slavery (1901) to discuss
plans for Washington to help him create an industrial school in Jamaica. Sadly,
Washington died a year before Garvey arrived, leading Garvey to ask the question,
“where is the Black man’s government? Where are his King and his kingdom? Where is
his president, his country, and his ambassador, his army, his navy, his men of big
affairs?” Finding none of these things Garvey resolved: “I will help to make them!” 96
Committing his life to answering these questions, Marcus Garvey became known
by many as the greatest Black leader of the twentieth century, as he led the only mass-
based repatriation movement through his organization the Universal Negro Improvement
Association and the Africa Communities League (UNIA-ACL). With a membership that
swelled to well over 5 million and 966 branches of the UNIA in the United States and
throughout the world,97Garvey went ahead with his plans of African redemption.
However, Garvey’s movement was not limited to simple repatriation, for Garvey
understood that the basis of racism was economics. Therefore, Garvey became a man of
industry, creating several Black owned businesses in Harlem. The UNIA’s inspiring
motto “Up, you mighty race; you can accomplish what you will!" encouraged community
participation in African redemption, through the UNIA’s the Negro World newspaper; its
95 Amos Wilson, Afrikan-Centered Consciousness Versus The New World Order: Garveyism in the Age of Globalism (New York, Afrikan World InfoSystems, 1999), 22. 96 Amy Jacques Garvey, The Philosophy & Opinion of Marcus Garvey, Or African for the Africans (Dover, Mass, The Majority Press, 1986), 126. 97 Amos Wilson, Afrikan-Centered Consciousness Versus the New World Order: Garveyism in the Age of Globalism (New York, Afrikan World InfoSystems, 1999), xi.
48
own church (African Orthodox Church); its own women’s groups (Black Cross nurses);
its own businesses (Black Swan Phonograph Company); its own industries (the Negro
Factories Corporation, the Berry and Ross Company that manufactured Black dolls); and
its own police force, choirs, bands, marching society, cooperatives, and labor unions.98
As result of Garvey’s UNIA membership and fund raising, Garvey started his most
audacious plan of all: the Black Star Line. The idea of the Black Star Line was to
physically link the three parts of the African world: the United States, the West Indies,
and Africa. Garvey even successfully negotiated the acquisition of land in Liberia. The
European powers, however, worked to block Garvey from coming to Africa, due to fears
that he would organize Africans in Africa to fight against colonialism. With the
assistance of the U.S government and W.E.B DuBois, they were successful in preventing
Garvey from coming to Africa. Garvey gives his account of what happened:
There was a great rubber shortage from 1922 up till 1925 on the part of the
Americans. You English had cornered the rubber market; you had the entire
rubber plantation under your control in the Malay Peninsula. The
Americans had no rubber reserve. Mr. Hoover acted as a foster father of all
American rubber interests. He set out to get control of rubber lands in any
part of the world where he possibly could get control of them. My
organization, in carrying out the serious program of rebuilding Africa
through the helped influence of the educated Negroes of the west going
home, had completed an agreement with the Liberian government for that
government to place at our disposal four sections of the little country so that
98 Nell Irvin Painter, Creating Black Americans: African-American History and its Meaning, 1619 to the Present (New York, Oxford University Press, 2007), 203-204.
49
we could start our experiment in helping build Liberia and make her worthy
worthwhile Negro state in West Africa……. An agreement was entered into
with the President of Liberia … After we had spent nearly half a million
dollars, after entering in to agreement s with expert civil engineers and
mechanical engineers and mining engineers. Firestone’s agent found out
that it was possible to grow rubber in Liberia. He influenced Liberian
President Charles King the man who had entered into a sacred contract with
us to abrogate the contract between us in his government and to place the
land at Firestone’s disposal. As a result, when our ships arrived, with nearly
200,000 worth of material in tow they took our material and have kept them
up till now. They also gave Firestone 1,000,000 acres of land which they
had placed at our disposal for colonization purposes; Firestone was backed
by the Secretary of Commerce in America.99
Educator and historian Walter Rodney elaborates on the political climate in
Liberia that led to Garvey’s betrayal in his book How Europe Underdeveloped Africa,
explaining the dynamics of colonization in Liberia and Firestone’s business there.
Rodney begins by stating "it is common knowledge that Liberia was an American colony
in everything but name. The U.S. supposedly aided the Liberian government with loans
but used the opportunity to take over Liberian customs revenue to plunder thousands of
square miles of Liberian land, and generally to dictate to the weak government of
Liberia.”100 The main investment in Liberia was undertaken by Firestone Rubber
99 Edited by John Henrik Clarke, Amy Jacques Garvey, Runoko Rashidi, Marcus Garvey and the Vision of Africa (Baltimore, Maryland, Black Classic Press, 1974), 293-294. 100 Walter Rodney, How Europe Underdeveloped Africa (Washington D.C., Howard University Press, 1982), 192.
50
Company. Firestone made such huge profits from Liberian rubber that it was the subject
of a book sponsored by American capitalist. Furthermore, between 1940 and 1965,
Firestone took 160 million dollars’ worth of rubber out of Liberia; while in return the
Liberian government received 8 million dollars.101As a result, the UNIA’s plan for
repatriation failed, however, Garvey still made several enemies who envied his position
as a leading figure in the Black world. By 1919 Garvey’s Negro World newspaper was
being circulated throughout the United States, Latin America, the West Indies and Africa,
as the leading Black periodical of the day, 102over rival papers such as W.E.B DuBois’s
Crisis, the organ of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People
(NAACP), and labor organizer A. Phillip Randolph’s the Messenger. Such success
caused envy amongst the Black leadership in America leading to Garvey must go rallies
led by A. Phillip Randolph and Chandler Owen.103
Nonetheless, the proverbial thorn in Garvey’s side would come from the attention
that he attracted from the United States and British governments, both of which viewed
his activities amongst there Black subjects with heightened dismay.104 Such animus by
the U.S. government led to several attempts to remove him from the country. For
instance, in 1921 Garvey by a whisker thwarted an attempt to bar him from returning to
the U.S., when for several months the State Department and its consular agents in the
Caribbean refused to give him a visa to re-enter the country after a short trip to the West
101 Ibid., 192-193. 102 Tony Martin, The Pan-African Connection: From Slavery to Garvey and Beyond (Dover, Massachusetts, The Majority Press, 1983), 57. 103 E. David Cronon, Black Moses: the story of Marcus Garvey and the Universal Negro Improvement Association (Madison, Wisconsin, The University of Wisconsin Press, 1981), 105-106. 104 Tony Martin, The Pan-African Connection: From Slavery to Garvey and Beyond (Dover, Massachusetts, The Majority Press, 1983), 95.
51
Indies.105 Attempts to deport and ban Garvey from the U.S. recommenced in 1922 when
Garvey was arrested on the charge of using the mails to defraud. The case was tried in
1923, with the prosecution alleging that Garvey mailed or caused to be mailed, circular
containing a misleading prospectus for the Black Star Line.106 The evidence produced
was an empty envelope bearing the imprint of the Black Star Line. Nevertheless, Garvey
was convicted given the maximum jail term and fined, ordered to pay the costs of the
trail, and initially imprisoned without bail pending his appeal. In 1925, Garvey lost his
appeal and entered the federal penitentiary in Atlanta. The government had accomplished
its mission; it had done what it had long desired and ensured that Garvey would be
deported as an alien convicted of a crime involving “moral turpitude,” where under
certain conditions one could be subject to deportation.107
After being released from prison and deported to Jamaica. Garvey would settle in
London, to resurrect his now defunct organization. It was during this time that Garvey’s
inability to fulfill his mission, his earlier deportation, political movement to the right, and
arguably inopportune condemnation of Ethiopian emperor Hailie Selassie; caused him to
fall out of favor with many of his most loyal and staunch supporters. Furthermore,
Garvey was labeled by his arch-nemesis Dubois as, “the most dangerous enemy of the
Negro race… and a lunatic or a traitor.”108 While others who were just as unkind viewed
him as an “opportunist and demagogic charlatan.”109 However, after Garvey’s death in
June of 1940, C.L.R James like many of Garvey’s critics came to eulogize Garvey, “as
105 Ibid., 95. 106 Ibid., 96. 107 Ibid., 96. 108 E. David Cronon, Black Moses: The Story of Marcus Garvey and the Universal Negro Improvement Association (Madison, Wisconsin, The University of Wisconsin Press, 1981), 190. 109 Ibid., 107.
52
one of the most important thinkers of the twentieth century.” 110Nevertheless, two
decades after his death he was seldom mentioned unless in contemptuous haste. It took
the calamity of Jim Crowism and the militant response of the Black Power movement of
the 1960s entrenched with the Garveyite colors of Red, Black and Green, advocacy of
racial pride, self-reliance, anti-imperialism, and revolutionary nationalism to raise Garvey
to his rightful place in the annals of history. 111
The Legacy of Marcus Garvey
Garvey bestrode the Black World in a manner no other Black leader has, for his
influence on the minds of subsequent generations of Pan-Africanist is effervescent.
Garvey resuscitated and further developed the model of what I have been calling the
‘alienated revolutionary.’ He did so by creating an all-encompassing movement that
focused on African repatriation but also on forging institutions capable of supporting
independent Black national existence throughout the Diaspora. Influenced by rising labor
activism and contacts with anti-colonial resistance leaders abroad, he infused a
transnational spirit into Black uplift in the United States. In doing so, he created the first
mass movement of alienated revolution in the U.S. Although his efforts failed ultimately,
especially the Liberian project, his legacy nevertheless would have an immense impact
for later generations.
The impact of Garvey’s work and legacy would begin with Carlos Cook a former
officer in Garvey’s Universal African Legion from the Dominican Republic. Cook who
created the African National Pioneer Movement (ANPM), an “educational, inspirational,
110 Colin Grant, Negro with A Hat: The Rise and Fall of Marcus Garvey (New York City, Oxford University Press, 2008), 454. 111 Tony Martin, Race First: The Ideological and Organizational Struggles of Marcus Garvey and the Universal Negro Improvement Association (Dover, Massachusetts, The Majority Press, 1976), 360.
53
instructive, constructive and expansive society” devoted to “bringing about a progressive,
dignified, cultural, fraternal and racial confraternity amongst the African people of the
world.”112 Cook was considered by Robert Harris to be Garvey’s ideological son due to
his consistent efforts to keep the work of Garvey alive, his obsequious devotion of
Garveyite teachings since the age of six, and his creation of the ANPM which sought to
establish a Marcus Garvey Memorial Building.113 The ANPM primarily focused on Black
economic self-reliance, self-love, and racial pride through its “Buy Black Campaign and
promotion of natural hairstyles and condemnation of the “ominous appellation”
“Negro.”114
Garvey’s influence also spread to the Nation of Islam (NOI) whose founder Elijah
Muhammad had Garveyite origins, as well as Malcolm X and the Organization of African
American Unity (OAAU) whose father was a UNIA organizer.115 Additionally, Garvey’s
impact philosophically reverberated throughout the African world, impacting Kwame
Nkrumah, Jomo Kenyatta and a healthy cadre of young African nationalist in colonial
Africa. For example, Kwame Nkrumah in his autobiography, Ghana: The Autobiography
of Kwame Nkrumah, acknowledged the impact The Philosophy and Opinions of Marcus
Garvey had on his thinking.116 Furthermore, Jomo Kenyatta, the first president of Kenya,
is said to have stated in regard to the Negro World the literary organ of the UNIA,
112 William L. Van Deburg, Modern Black Nationalism: From Marcus Garvey to Louis Farrakhan (New York City, New York University Press, 1997), 84. 113 Robert Harris, Nyota Harris, Grandassa Harris, Carlos Cooks and Black Nationalism: From Garvey to Malcolm (Dover, Massachusetts, The Majority Press, 1992), x. 114 Ibid., 84. 115 Tony Martin, Race First: The Ideological and Organizational Struggles of Marcus Garvey and the Universal Negro Improvement Association (Dover, Massachusetts, The Majority Press, 1976), 360. 116 Kwame Nkrumah, Ghana: The Autobiography of Kwame Nkrumah (New York City, International Publishers, 1957), 45.
54
“Africans memorized its articles to share with other Africans hungry for some doctrine
which lifted them from the servile consciousness in which [they lived].”117
Such sentiments on the African continent speak to Garvey’s ability as a master
propagandist and organizer who channeled the anger, frustration, and disillusionment of
Blacks worldwide to promote Black economic prosperity, educational advancement,
religious autonomy, and African political independence. Furthermore, his ability to
surpass his political contemporaries and rivals such as Hubert Harrison, due to his
inability to translate ideas into a strong mass organization; to W.E.B DuBois who was
seemingly handcuffed and cloistered by the White-led and dominated NAACP due to
liberal white paternalism;118 and A. Phillip Randolph who was simply a labor activist,
speaks to Garvey’s transformative role as the preeminent leader of the Black world.
Moreover, Garvey also played a role in the development of numerous Black
writers giving them the ability to share their talents and their views to African people and
the world through the pages of the Negro World. Numerous notable writers ranging from
Zora Neale Hurston, and J.A. Rogers to Carter G. Woodson and Arthur A. Schomburg all
graced the pages of the UNIA’s literary organ at some point in time.119 To conclude,
Garvey’s most enduring act was arguably his creation of the Pan-African Flag (Red,
Black, and Green) to represent African people as a nation (not a nation state), and his
dream of a United States of Africa. Garvey’s flag is still used to this day to identify
African people at home and abroad as one people, while the Red, Black, and Green colors
117 Robert Trent Vinson, The Americans Are Coming: Dreams of African American Liberation in Segregationist South Africa (Athens, Ohio, Ohio University Press 2012), 69. 118 William M. Brewer, “Some Memories of Dr. W.E.B DuBois,” The Journal of Negro History 53, no.4 (1968): 346. 119 Amos Wilson, Afrikan-Centered Consciousness Versus the New World Order: Garveyism in the Age of Globalism (New York, Afrikan World InfoSystems, 1999), X.
55
were used by numerous African countries to create their flags during the African
Independence era. Finally, Garvey’s dream of a United States of Africa came to fruition
twenty-three years after his death with the creation of the Organization of African Unity
(OAU) on May 25th, 1963.
Marcus Garvey’s stance of the ‘alienated revolutionary’ receives its fullest
expression in the direction of organization building, Black separatism, and African
repatriation. Garvey’s rejection of white power structures, refusal to work within or with
them to create reforms, something DuBois arguably sought to do, speaks to his Pan-
African belief in Black self-assertion, his insistence on Black institution building so as to
create a separate sphere of Black empowerment within the Diaspora and a basis for Black
repatriation in Africa. In this respect, Garvey continues the voluntary self-alienation (via
repatriation) and organization building that first emerged among early era Pan-Africanists
such as Crummell, Delaney, Turner, and Williams. The militant legacy of David Walker
would persist, however, and reappear in later figures like Malcolm X. Garvey’s legacy,
too, would continue powerfully, especially in organizations like the Nation of Islam and
in the Civil Rights and Black Power Movement in which his philosophies and opinions
would once again be called upon to address the problems of African life in America.
56
Chapter 3 Garveyism in the Modern Era
Black Political Self-Determination in the Southeastern United States
“The only way we gonna stop them white men from whuppin’ us is to take over,”… We
been saying freedom for six years and we ain’t got nothing.” What we gonna start saying
now is Black Power! 120
, Stokely Carmichael
In the post-Garvey world, the Second World War kept African Americans’
attention turned outward: toward their traditional concern with Africa, Europe, and the
colonized world.121 African Americans identified with the colonized peoples of Africa,
the Caribbean, and Asia. They also took a special interest in India’s drive toward
independence, a concern that the UNIA had once voiced in the 1920s.122 Moreover, once
again African Americans were confronted with the need to struggle for the United States’
war aims and against American racism.123This two-pronged struggle (later known as the
“Double Vee” strategy) to secure victory over Nazism in Europe and racism in America
would lead to a renewed fervor in the fight for African American human rights, through
the politics of assimilationism and the belief in the power of moral persuasion, best
articulated by the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.
Due to the leadership of Dr. King numerous African American’s embraced
assimilationism in their approach to fight for human rights. This approach led to the ideas
120 William L. Van Deburg, Modern Black Nationalism: From the Marcus Garvey to Louis Farrakhan (New York, New York University Press 1997), 119. 121 Nell Irvin Painter, Creating Black Americans: African American History and Its Meanings, 1619 to the Present (New York, Oxford University Press 2007), 239. 122 Ibid., 239. 123 Ibid., 239.
57
of Garvey becoming obscure until the rise of the Black Power movement questioned the
efficacy of assimilationism and the politics of moral persuasion.
By the 1960s, the American Civil Rights Movement was in crisis. Malcolm X, the
eloquent spokesman of Black Power, had been assassinated, and numerous activists had
become disillusioned with the Big Three Civil Rights organizations’ (SCLC, CORE,
Urban League) inability to create tangible change for an exceedingly impatient African
American populace, suffering from the vicissitudes of American racism, urban squalor,
voter repression, and state-sponsored terrorism.
To solve this problem, the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC,
pronounced “snick”) was formed in 1960 to help facilitate nonviolent direct action civil
rights demonstrations throughout the South.124 By mid-decade, however, Black-white
tensions within the organization and the growing attraction of Black Nationalism as an
ideology and organizational tool caused SNCC leaders Stokely Carmichael (now Kwame
Ture) and H. Rap Brown (now Jamil Abdullah Al-Amin) to conclude that their work
would be made easier if non-Blacks were excluded from participation.125 In 1966, whites
were expelled from the organization as SNCC adopted an openly nationalistic orientation.
Carmichael, at the age of twenty-five, would become Chairperson of SNCC.
Carmichael, a Trinidadian born, Bronx, New York raised, Howard University educated,
self-proclaimed Pan-Africanist, who was once known as the Prime Minister of Afro-
America, was the final survivor of the iconic Civil Rights triumvirate that had included
Malcolm X and Dr. King. Carmichael, like Garvey, believed that Black political power
124 William L. Van Deburg, Modern Black Nationalism: From the Marcus Garvey to Louis Farrakhan (New York, New York University Press 1997), 119. 125 Ibid., 119.
58
resided in the will and political self-determination of the common person e.g.,126 the poor,
destitute and despondent –living under the debilitating conditions of legal segregation,
social degradation, political disenfranchisement, and economic exploitation.
Consequently, Carmichael traced the need for Black Power to the weakness of the
nonviolent Civil Rights Movement. The beating and murdering of Civil Rights workers
and the killing of Black little girls in Sunday school angered Black people everywhere;
nonviolent Civil Rights workers “had nothing to offer…except to go out and be beaten
again.”127 This sentiment revealed that the success in acquiring sweeping Civil Rights
legislation rang hollow, due to the laws’ failure to improve Black life and its inability to
take aim at the de facto structural and economic inequities of Northern and Western
cities. 128
Carmichael and the Black Power movement represented a further evolution in the
figure of the “alienated revolutionary,” which, as we have seen, constitutes the core,
animating spirt of Pan-Africanism. In periods of crisis, when avenues of advancement
within the dominant structures of white power become restricted or non-existent, the
stance of alienated revolution can once again become relevant to Black communities.
Carmichael illustrates this phenomenon via his militancy modeled in the spirit of the
Haitian Revolution and in his statements and actions reminiscent of proto-Pan-Africanist
David Walker. At the same time, Carmichael channels the organizational example of
Marcus Garvey to create viable structures to empower Black self-reliance. The alienated
revolutionary is a militant who turns away from white power in order to build Black
126 Peniel E. Joseph, Stokely: A Life (New York City, BasicCivitas Books 2014), 87. 127 Nell Irvin Painter, Creating Black Americans: African American History and Its Meanings, 1619 to the Present (New York, Oxford University Press 2007), 319. 128 Ibid., 319.
59
power. Carmichael, like Walker and Garvey, grasped this truth. With Carmichael, we see
the alienated revolution of Pan-Africanism once again reassert its relevance in a time of
crisis.
Stokely Carmichael and Black Power: Lowndes County Freedom Organization
(LCFO)
In the mid-1960s, Lowndes County was one of the poorest counties in the nation.
A rural county, Lowndes was known as “Bloody Lowndes” due to the high rate of white
terrorist violence against Blacks to maintain segregation. Lowndes is situated just ten
miles from Selma (Dallas County) and the infamous Edmund Pettis Bridge. At the time
Lowndes was considered feudal by outsiders, who argued that it made the Mississippi
Delta look advanced.129 Moreover, Lowndes is located in the heart of Alabama’s Black
Belt, a string of seventeen counties with fertile black clay soil that stretches 170 miles
from the border with Georgia to the Mississippi state line.130 Lowndes would become the
home of southern Black militancy, in which traditional Black leaders, preachers, teachers,
and business persons-were eschewed for outsiders with a hunger for freedom. 131
Lowndes was a county budding with potential, home to 15,000 inhabitants
including 12,000 African Americans. Furthermore, Lowndes like several counties in
Alabama’s Black Belt had a majority Black population, yet not one of them could vote.132
Further exacerbating the issue was the fact that about eighty families owned 90 percent of
the land, leaving half of the Black population below the poverty level, with most of the
129 Stokely Carmichael with Ekwueme Michael Thelwell, Ready for Revolution: The Life and Struggles of Stokely Carmichael {Kwame Ture} (New York City, Scribner 2003), 457. 130 Hasan Kwame Jeffries, Bloody Lowndes: Civil Rights and Black Power in Alabama’s Black Belt (New York City, New York University Press, 2009), 4. 131 Ibid.,4. 132 Stokely Carmichael with Ekwueme Michael Thelwell, Ready for Revolution: The Life and Struggles of Stokely Carmichael {Kwame Ture} (New York City, Scribner 2003), 457.
60
other half barely above it. Most of the women worked as sharecroppers or housemaids
making around $4 a day, while the men commuted to Montgomery for work.133
In 1966, Carmichael gave prominence to the words “Black Power” during James
Meredith’s Mississippi “Walk Against Fear,” in which Meredith was shot by an assailant
on the first day of his march.134 Carmichael seized the moment at a rally in support of
Meredith when he stated, “The only way we gonna stop them white men from whuppin’
us is to take over … We been saying freedom for six years and we ain’t got
nothing…What we gonna start saying now is Black Power!”135
Carmichael’s creation of the Lowndes County Freedom Organization (LCFO)
would fulfill his dream of organizing underrepresented people, while also developing a
nuanced form of Pan-Africanism that moved from an activist/warrior paradigm to a
builder/creator perspective, in which Black people would have something to fight for
rather than against. Moreover, the creation of the LCFO also signaled a change from
building alternative power outside of the American political power structure to building
legitimate power inside of it, as well as a desire to move past the small incremental and
seemingly insignificant gains made by the mainstream Civil Rights establishment. SNCC
and Carmichael sought to do more than simply upset the establishment by retiring a few
African-killing sheriffs;136 they wanted to upset the apple cart by turning Lowndes from a
citadel of white supremacy to the center of southern Black militancy. This model of
activism that Carmichael pioneered constituted a critical shift in the alienated
133 Ibid., 457. 134 Neil Irvin Painter, Creating Black Americans: African American History and its Meanings, 1619 to the Present (New York City, Oxford University Press, 2007), 319. 135 William L. Van Deburg, Modern Black Nationalism: From the Marcus Garvey to Louis Farrakhan (New York, New York University Press, 1997), 119. 136 Stokely Carmichael with Ekwueme Michael Thelwell, Ready for Revolution: The Life and Struggles of Stokely Carmichael {Kwame Ture} (New York City, Scribner 2003), 457.
61
revolutionary stance. Like Garvey, he focused on Black solidarity and Black
empowerment. But, rather than building separatist structures, Carmichael attempted to
develop a Black power base that could bend white power to Black interest. The emphasis
was not on integration but rather on a form of local political domination in a location in
which African Americans constituted the numerical majority. The shift here was from
militant revolutionary to democratic activist, focused on creating Black power and local
Black control. This shift, however, did not preclude a strategic resort to armed self-
defense. In Carmichael, Haiti and Garvey would coincide as a single, integrated model of
Pan-Africanist alienated revolution.
In order to become the vehicle for Black empowerment that Carmichael imagined,
the LCFO would first have to distinguish itself from it grassroots populist predecessor,
the Mississippi Freedom Democratic Party (MFDP). The LCFO would do so by choosing
the Black Panther as its symbol, noting the animal’s color and ability to defend itself.137
Nevertheless, going from dream to reality would take time, luck, hard work, and
money. Carmichael, who (like Garvey) initially took a less confrontational approach with
the white American power structure in the quest to improve the lives of African
Americans, would find himself in the role of “alienated revolutionary,”138 “cynical about
existing power structures but [arguing] that progressive change can only take place via
the use of calculated acts of instrumental violence.” 139As we will see, Carmichael would
use armed force strategically to project his independent electoral strategy in Lowndes
County against the renewal of white vigilante violence. Such a perspective should be
137 Peniel E. Joseph, Stokely: A Life (New York City, BasicCivitas Books, 2014), 93. 138 John T. McCartney, Black Power Ideologies: An Essay in African American Political Thought (Philadelphia, Temple University Press, 1992), 112. 139 Ibid., 112.
62
considered sensible and politically intelligent, considering SNCC’s and Carmichael’s
previous and unsuccessful forays with the Democratic Party in the south. Carmichael
explained SNCC’s reasoning in choosing to organize an independent political party
stating, “To ask Negros to get in the Democratic Party is like asking Jews to join the Nazi
party!” Courtland Cox, SNCC’s program coordinator, echoed Carmichael’s sentiments
stating. “The Negro can’t control the Democratic Party on the state or county levels in
Alabama, he ought to organize something he can control.140
As expected, SNCC and Carmichael’s militant all-Black approach to political
organizing was castigated far and wide by fellow Civil Rights leaders, organizations, and
the press, similar to the way Garvey was demonized via the Garvey Must Go! Campaign.
This campaign was spearheaded by former ally turned political rival, and labor activist A.
Philip Randolph, who lead a cadre of leaders against Garvey. These leaders included
Chandler Owen, co-editor of the Messenger; orator and educator William Pickens; and
W.E.B DuBois, co-founder of the NAACP and editor of Crisis magazine.141
Carmichael’s detractors were not as harsh or as consistent as were Garvey’s,
however, the words of The New York Times, the SCLC, and the Democratic Party were
just as venomous. For example, the New York Times called SNCC’s organizing efforts
political sabotage. In an editorial, the paper claimed that extremist elements in Alabama’s
civil rights movement had adopted a rule-or ruin attitude toward the forthcoming
Democratic primary there that could only produce frustration and defeat for the state’s
Negroes.142 Such criticism was expected from the white press, which routinely lambasted
140 Peniel E. Joseph, Stokely: A Life (New York City, BasicCivitas Books, 2014), 97. 141 Colin Grant, Negro with A Hat: The Rise and Fall of Marcus Garvey (New York City, Oxford University Press, 2008), 336. 142 Peniel E. Joseph, Stokely: A Life (New York City, BasicCivitas Books, 2014), 97.
63
Black self-determination and agency as ill-witted and doomed to failure. Moreover,
shockingly Dr. King, Hosea Williams, and the SCLC publicly urged Blacks to support
the liberal candidate Richmond Flowers in the upcoming gubernatorial Democratic
primary after SNCC called for Blacks to boycott the primary to vote in the LCFO
primary.143 To the shock of Carmichael and others, Williams justified his actions by
arguing that “Blacks knew little about politics and lacked the time to learn, they were
required to support white candidates offering the best deal.”144
However, the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act
of 1965 in August of that year would greatly booster the LCFO’s prospects of
successfully organizing an independent Black political party. Furthermore, Lowndes
County became the first county in the south where a federal register was assigned under
the new law.145
Nevertheless, skepticism amongst the Black community in Lowndes was high. To
them they didn’t think an “all-Black” party could be any good; they automatically saw
voting as an inclusive activity.146 They saw an all-Black party as the same old
segregation. The other reason for skepticism was sadly due to a lack of self-confidence.
They had been conditioned to think that politics was “white folks” business,” due to the
indoctrination that they were not allowed to participate in politics because they were
incompetent.147 These issues, however, were solved with political education courses, as
well showing them the educational background of the white local officials. They soon
143 Ibid., 98. 144 Ibid., 98. 145 Stokely Carmichael with Ekwueme Michael Thelwell, Ready for Revolution: The Life and Struggles of Stokely Carmichael {Kwame Ture} (New York City, Scribner 2003), 462. 146 Ibid., 463. 147 Ibid., 463.
64
realized what a hoax that narrative was, and with the continuing political education
courses their confidence grew. 148
However, the whites in Lowndes County did not take kind to outsiders stirring up
their good niggers, and they turned to the only leverage they had to try to stop SNCC and
Carmichael’s organizing efforts, using white vigilante violence and their ownership of
land. Whites, however, found their attempt to defeat the movement through violence
ineffective, due to the local African American population’s rejection of non-violence and
embrace of armed self-defense,149in which they called non-violent protest…too
dangerous stating, ‘“you can’t come here talking that nonviolent shit. You’ll get yourself
killed and other people too.”’150
Whites responded to the ineffective use of violence to neutralize Carmichael and
SNCC organizers by exploiting the economic vulnerability of the movement’s base. To
do so they evicted tenant farmers and sharecroppers involved in the LCFO from their
land. SNCC’s response was swift, creating a Tent City (also known as Freedom City) to
keep evictees from leaving the county.151 However, life in the refuge was difficult, to say
the least; the first set of families, totaling fifteen people, shared a single outhouse and
toted water for cooking and drinking from a well on a distant farm. Moreover, some of
the tents had holes that freely admitted the wind and the rain, and only two had wood
floors to trap the feeble heat emanating from the inefficient stoves.152
148 Ibid., 463. 149 Hasan Kwame Jeffries, Bloody Lowndes: Civil Rights and Black Power in Alabama’s Black Belt (New York City, New York University Press, 2009), 4). 150 Ibid.,104. 151 Ibid.,107. 152 Ibid.,107.
65
Nevertheless, the Lowndes movement began with a voter registration drive that
on May 3, 1966 registered over 900 Black voters who cast their ballots at the county seat
in Hayneville as independent participants in the primary. In the subsequent months
leading to the November general election, Carmichael and the LCFO were able to list a
slate of candidates. Sadly, none were elected due to the power of plantation bosses
coercing their captive workers to vote against the LCFO candidates.
However, the organizing efforts of SNCC and Carmichael in creating the LCFO
were not in vain, for five years after their initial convention, John Hulett, an African
American gentleman who in 1965 could not vote, and who recalled having to duck “like a
deer” into the bushes when the sheriff’s car approached, was elected sheriff of Lowndes
County.153Charles Smith became county commissioner, and in the next election, Hulett
and Smith headed a slate of eight African Americans, winning every seat contested. 154
The creation of the LCFO through Carmichael’s embrace of the concept of the
alienated revolutionary, one that is cynical about existing power structures but argues that
progressive change can only take place via the use of calculated acts of instrumental
violence,”155transformed local Black political behavior by providing African Americans
with a framework for a new kind of political engagement. This framework inspired Black
activists and emboldened Black radicals nationwide, including Oakland-based organizers
Bobby Seale and Huey P. Newton, who named the Black Panther Party for Self-Defense
after the LCFO ballot symbol.156 Moreover, SNCC and Carmichael also provided a new
153 Stokely Carmichael with Ekwueme Michael Thelwell, Ready for Revolution: The Life and Struggles of Stokely Carmichael {Kwame Ture} (New York City, Scribner, 2003), 473. 154 Ibid., 473. 155 John T. McCartney, Black Power Ideologies: An Essay in African American Political Thought (Philadelphia, Temple University Press, 1992), 112. 156 Hasan Kwame Jeffries, Bloody Lowndes: Civil Rights and Black Power in Alabama’s Black Belt (New York City, New York University Press, 2009), 2.
66
generation of African American activists with a new, more radical, rallying cry and
program known as Black Power that would be used to continue to organize third party
political organizations. For example, John Cashin an African American dentist and
political activist from Huntsville, Alabama, founded a statewide third party in 1968
patterned after the LCFO.157 Moreover, African Americans remained interested in
independent Black politics well into the early 1970s, culminating in the convening of
Black political conventions in Gary, Indiana in 1972, and in Little Rock, Arkansas, in
1974. 158
African American involvement in Black independent politics would wane
considerably in the following years due to the dissolution of SNCC in 1976. Moreover,
the difficulty of Black elected officials to bring about the social and economic changes
that African Americans sought because of wealthy and influential whites’ control of the
Democratic and Republican parties at states and national levels would also contribute to
the decline of Black independent politics.159However, after nearly 50 years the call to
independent Black politics and the concept of the alienated revolutionary would be
revived in the successful bid to elect Chokwe Lumumba the former vice president of the
Republic of New Afrika, Mayor of Jackson, Mississippi. In this emphasis, Lumumba
represented a continuation of Carmichael’s integrated figure of the alienated
revolutionary, i.e., the figure who brings together the Haitian type of violent self-
assertion with the Garvey-type of Black Nationalist empowerment and organization.
157 Hasan Kwame Jefferies, “SNCC, Black Power, and Independent Political Party Organizing in Alabama, 1964-1966,” Journal of African American History 91, no.2 (2006): 187. 158 Ibid., 187. 159 Ibid., 187.
67
A Revolutionary in Mississippi: Chokwe Lumumba Mayor of Jackson, Mississippi
Chokwe Lumumba, born August 2, 1947 as Edwin Finley Taliaferro in Detroit,
Michigan, saw and experienced racism growing up at an very early age, from all-white
restaurants in Dearborn that wouldn’t serve his family, to housing and job discrimination
in the inner city.160 These early experiences with racial discrimination led to a high level
of social consciousness that would be fed by the era’s images: Emmitt Till’s battered
teenaged corpse, street battlers and sit-ins, and most formatively the assassination of Rev.
Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.161
These images would radicalize a young Taliaferro, leading him to adopt a new
name in honor of slain Congolese Pan-Africanist revolutionary and former Prime Minster
of the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Patrice Lumumba.162 Lumumba would come to
embrace, the concept of the alienated revolutionary, “one who is cynical about existing
power structures but argues that progressive change can only take place via the use of
calculated acts of instrumental violence.”163This concept which arguably became the
basis of his work as an attorney and public administrator helped him possibly create the
framework for a more nuanced form of Pan-Africanism in which its adherents move
away from a focus on creating social organizations that exclusively promote Black pride,
self-love, and an embrace of African heritage and history toward a pragmatically based
focus on obtaining legitimate political and economic power in U.S. society.
160 Bhaskar Sunkara, “Free the Land: An Interview with Chowke Lumumba,” JACOBIN, June 1st, 2014, https://www.jacobinmag.com/2014/06/free-the-land 161 Ibid., 2 162 Ibid., 163 John T. McCartney, Black Power Ideologies: An Essay in African American Political Thought (Philadelphia, Temple University Press, 1992), 112.
68
To do so, Lumumba would obtain a degree in political science from Kalamazoo
College and attend law school at Wayne State University, only to put his graduate studies
on hold to join the nascent Republic of New Afrika (RNA) and serve as its “consul from
Detroit,” and later its vice president.164 The RNA, founded in 1968 in Detroit, Michigan,
was a Black Nationalist organization and movement that indirectly traced its origins and
teachings to Marcus Garvey’s UNIA. The RNA would advocate for a number of states in
the Southeastern U.S. while rebranding Garvey’s Pan-African flag from Red, Black and
Green to Green, Red and Black. The purpose of the RNA, unlike previous Civil Rights
organizations, was not to achieve integration or voting rights, but to establish a new
nation in the heartland of US slavery, one where Black people could rule themselves,
mounting their own secession from both the northern and southern styles of racism alike.
This quest was, to its adherents, a natural extension of the independence struggles then
spreading across the African continent.165
The RNA relocated to Jackson as a prelude to expanding in the south. Lumumba
joined them in Jackson where, as in other cities in Mississippi, Blacks had little political
representation and southern white Mississippian’s nostalgia for Jim Crow was still
strong.166 In August of the same year, local police and FBI agents raided the RNA
compound. In the ensuing gun battle, in which Lumumba was not present, a police officer
was killed and another, along with a federal agent, was wounded. Eleven New Afrika
164 Siddhartha Mitter, “Chokwe Lumumba, radical mayor of Jackson, Miss., dies at 66,” Al-Jazeera English, February 26, 2014. 165 Nathan Schneider, “The Revolutionary Life and Strange Death of a Radical Black Mayor,” VICE, April 17,2016, https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/5gj7da/free-the-land-v23n2. 166 Bhaskar Sunkara, “Free the Land: An Interview with Chowke Lumumba,” JACOBIN, June 1st, 2014, https://www.jacobinmag.com/2014/06/free-the-land
69
members were arrested.167 Afterward, Lumumba would move back to Detroit, finishing
his law degree at Wayne State University in 1975.168
However, Lumumba’s revolutionary fire did not die; in 1978 he set up his own
law firm in Detroit and quickly gained a reputation for taking on the defense of militants
and revolutionaries, including Fulani Sunni Ali, rapper Tupac Shakur, and former Black
Panther Party members Geronimo Pratt and Assata Shakur. 169
Lumumba would return to Mississippi in 1988, after convincing his wife Nubia to
move with him. However, his record was not to the liking of the Mississippi bar and they
took three years to admit him.170 Lumumba would subsequently help found the Malcolm
X Grassroots Movement (MXGM) in 1990, to help develop a new generation of
activists,171 and in 2009 he ran for a city council seat in Jackson. The help of the MXGM
and his name recognition as an attorney of the people propelled him to victory.
However, it became clear to Lumumba that real power in Jackson- in particular,
power over infrastructure contracts in Jackson, was vested in the mayor’s office.
Lumumba’s successful bid for Mayor of Jackson thrust him into the national spotlight,
while also making him a media darling even though he never eschewed his Pan-
Africanist beliefs or principles, using a campaign slogan that echoed the greatness of the
Garvey era, “One city, One aim, One destiny.”172
Moreover, Lumumba would embody the concept of the “alienated statesmen," one
who prescribes to the ideas of Pan-Africanism, while seeking political office/power
167 Ibid., 2. 168 Ibid., 2. 169 Ibid., 2. 170 Ibid., 2. 171 Nathan Schneider, “The Revolutionary Life and Strange Death of a Radical Black Mayor,” VICE April 17, 2016, https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/5gj7da/free-the-land-v23n2. 172 Ibid., 10.
70
outside of the two-party system with the implicit goal to use said office/power to the
benefit of African/Black people. The concept of the alienated statesmen was
demonstrated in his ability to obtain legitimate political power in Jackson, Mississippi, by
embracing existing powers structures and operating within the mechanisms of democratic
governance. In doing so, Lumumba shifted the concept of the alienated revolutionary
who uses acts of violence to the alienated statesmen who in a non-violent manner,
focuses on the accumulation of power on behalf of African Americans through the ballot
box via Black independent political organizing. As a result, Lumumba’s administration
created a form of resistance that is more durable than protest, yet not perceived as
dangerous as revolutionary violence. Additionally, Lumumba’s nuanced form of
alienation sought to break the monopoly of white political power from Tunica, in
northwest Mississippi to Wilkerson County in the southwest in which eighteen
predominantly Black counties in the state would finally begin to engage in Black self-
representation.173 Lumumba, believed that the route to self-determination could be led
through the accumulation of government slots to demand and build more for the Black
community in Mississippi.
To do so Lumumba would create an ambitious economic scheme based on
Ujamaa a Kwanzaa principal (a concept of former Tanzanian president Julius Nyerere),
in which he sought to use city contracts and economic leverage to foster worker
ownership.174 The plan, if successful, would transform 10 percent of Jackson’s economy
173 Bhaskar Sunkara, “Free the Land: An Interview with Chowke Lumumba,” JACOBIN, June 1st, 2014, https://www.jacobinmag.com/2014/06/free-the-land 174 Ibid., 3.
71
into cooperatives by the end of his first term. Sadly, Lumumba died of a heart attack 14
months into his first term.
Nonetheless, Lumumba’s ability to achieve mainstream political success as an
unapologetic Pan-Africanist is something to behold; while also dispelling the belief that
“radicals” are unable to be effective leaders due to making impossible demands and
acting on reactive rage. Lumumba on the contrary was a strategist, thinking in bullet
points, enumerating and analyzing past mistakes to make future plans. 175
Furthermore, Lumumba’s use of the alienated statesman reflects his ability to
successfully continue the struggle for Black self-determination in an ever globalizing and
diversifying America; in which the Black/White political binary is no longer mutually
exclusive due to the influx of multiple ethnicities, races, cultures and identities becoming
part of the American cultural milieu.
175 Nathan Schneider, “The Revolutionary Life and Strange Death of a Radical Black Mayor,” VICE, April 17, 2016, https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/5gj7da/free-the-land-v23n2.
72
Chapter 4
Pan-Africanism in the 21st century
“Pan-Africanism is the highest political expression of Black Power.”176
Stokely Carmichael
This thesis has traced the evolution of the concept of the alienated revolutionary
across Pan-Africanist movements and leaders. Four main lines of development have
emerged: the orientation toward militancy and violence in response to white power; the
turning away from white power through voluntary self-alienation (i.e. via repatriation to
Africa); the creation of organizational structures that can ground Pan-Africanism in the
United States and in Africa; and a synthesis of militancy and organization building for the
purpose of building Black power though available democratic means.
The viability of these different modes of development has been based on the
sociopolitical and economic realities that African people have faced in relation to the
white power structure since being ruthlessly exported from Africa to the Western world
centuries ago. For example, in 1791 on the small Caribbean island of Hispaniola, African
people suffering under the debilitating conditions of chattel enslavement relied upon the
efficacy of militant violent revolution to free themselves from bondage. In doing so, they
would create the world’s first Black republic in the Western Hemisphere: the island
country of Haiti. Additionally, the development of the alienated revolutionaries’
movement towards self-alienation (i.e. repatriation to Africa) can be seen in the life and
work of several nineteenth century era Pan-Africanists, such as Paul Cuffe, Alexander
Crummell, and Martin Delany. Self-alienation from white power (i.e., repatriation to
176 Peniel E. Joseph, Stokely: A Life (New York City, BasicCivitas Books, 2014), 289.
73
Africa) became a viable option during their lifetimes due to numerous challenges with the
white power structure such as chattel enslavement, the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850, and
the creation of the American Colonization Society (ACS) to name a few.
Furthermore, the expansion of alienated revolution through the work of Bishop
Henry McNeal Turner and Marcus Garvey would continue via the creation of
organizational structures that helped ground Pan-Africanism in the United States as a
viable mode of resistance to anti-Black racism. Turner’s KAEA and LEC, and Garvey’s
UNIA both sought to establish transcontinental ties among African people while also
creating organizations in the U.S. to improve Black life.
Consequently, nearly a half-century later Stokely Carmichael’s creation of the
LCFO and Chokwe Lumumba Sr.’s use of pragmatic Pan-Africanism as Mayor of
Jackson, Mississippi ushered in a new wave of Pan-Africanism. Their use of militancy
and organization building to gain political power through available democratic means
further developed the concept of the alienated revolutionary to that of the alienated
statesman. The alienated statesman is one who in a non-violent manner, focuses on the
accumulation of political power on behalf of African Americans through the ballot box
via Black independent third-party politics.
Lumumba Sr.’s success is even more impressive considering that the concept and
idea of Pan-Africanism has lost its currency in African American political discourse.
Lumumba Sr.’s use of the concept of the alienated statesman and quest for legitimate
political power helped to create a movement that would last longer than a protest, while
also not being centered on a cult of personality as was the case with previous Pan-
Africanist ideas, organizations, and movements. Lumumba Sr. modeled how Black
74
solidarity can achieve electoral results, exemplifying the importance of moving from
militancy to professional leadership within the electoral process under the current
conditions of white nationalist resurgence.
For example, in July of 2017, Chokwe Lumumba, Jr. was elected Mayor of
Jackson, showing that the relationships and goodwill fostered during his father’s
administration are still alive and well. The election of Lumumba Jr. continues the
ambitious work of Lumumba Sr., preventing Lumumba Sr.’s achievement from
becoming a flash in the pan success. Moreover, Lumumba, Jr.’s election as Mayor of
Jackson shows that militant Pan-Africanism can find consistent success in U.S. society by
using one’s professional skills, charm, credentials, and gravitas to successfully compete
for power and resources.
Furthermore, this model of leadership can offer movements like
#BlackLivesMatter, #ConcernedStudent1950, #MillionStudentMarch, and
#Blackoncampus a template on how to create effective, lasting change. These movements
have emerged in a time in which African American life has become increasingly difficult
due to the rise and resurgence of White Nationalist Hate Groups (WNHG), the
accumulative surge of white vigilante violence (George Zimmerman, Michael Dunn), and
extrajudicial killings of African Americans (Sandra Bland, Tamir Rice, etc.) at a rate that
rivals the “first nadir”.177 Moreover, the resurgence in organized acts of violence towards
African Americans and the rise in anti-Black racism can be traced to the rising tide of
177 The first nadir is a term coined by historian Rayford Logan, to describe a period in US history in the Southern United States from the end of Reconstruction in 1877 through the early 20th century, when racism was worse than in any other period after the American Civil War. During this period, African Americans lost many civil rights gains made during Reconstruction. Anti-black violence, lynchings, segregation, legal racial discrimination, and expressions of white supremacy were omnipresent.
75
color in America. Reactionary efforts of white Americans to safeguard their perceived
threatened social status have emerged from their perception of a gap between their
expected and actual social status and power causing them to deeply resent current social
arrangements.178 The illusion of erasure from their position as the dominant American
esthetic has led a sizable contingent of white Americans to create political organizations
and movements to regain said power and status. Examples of this can be seen in the
creation of the Tea Party movement, the Alt-Right movement, and the election of Donald
J. Trump as the 45th president of the United States, after running a campaign based on
bigotry, xenophobia, and racism. Therefore, it is paramount that African Americans move
from protest to action, from simply elucidating how systems of oppression affect
historically marginalized groups in a myriad of ways, to effectively combating racialized
oppression and anti-Black racism in an organized manner by obtaining positions of
power.
Because of the resurgence of White nationalism in the U.S., it is imperative that
the models of alienated revolution created by Garvey, Carmichael, and Lumumba Sr. be
expanded upon to not only empower Black people but also reassert Pan-Africanism as a
viable mode of resistance to white supremacy in the age of globalization. The stances of
alienated revolution practiced by Marcus Garvey through organization building, Black
separatism, African repatriation, and Carmichael and Lumumba Sr.’s stance of alienated
statesmen – if expanded upon, can help create a quasi-nation state in the southeastern
United States. Similar to the audacious plan outlined by the RNA over 40 years ago, the
plan outlined above can be accomplished if Blacks would eschew their loyalties to the
178 Kathleen M. Blee, “Becoming A Racist Women in Contemporary Ku Klux Klan and Neo-Nazi Groups,” Gender and Society 10, no. 6 (1996): 683.
76
Democratic and Republican parties in favor of a race-first third party platform to gain
political power.
Moreover, Chokwe Lumumba Sr.’s use of the expansion of the concept of the
alienated revolutionary to the alienated statesmen and quest for legitimate political
power, in my opinion, is the template for a paradigm shift in how Pan-Africanism is
articulated, advocated, and used to better the lives of African people in America.
Furthermore, this paradigm shift has answered the question that other contemporary
modes of thought have been unable to answer by moving from protest to action; from
criticizing political leaders to becoming the very leaders you want and need; and most
importantly by understanding that in order to affect lasting change one must not only gain
institutional and organizational power, but also in the words of Stokely Carmichael
organize, organize, organize.
I have argued in this thesis that Pan-Africanism can prescribe points of
intervention if properly channeled in a nuanced, race-first form. Its adherents must move
away from a focus on creating social organizations that exclusively promote Black pride,
self-love, and an embrace of African heritage and history towards a pragmatically based
focus on obtaining legitimate political and economic power in U.S. society. Its adherents
must make the transition from warrior and activist to diplomat, statesmen, and
professional. They can then use these positions of power and influence to create
legitimate spaces of power for African people to build, develop, and maintain rather than
only criticize, deconstruct, and destroy.
I have also raised the question, is Pan-Africanism still a viable form of resistance
to white supremacy in the age of globalization? Pan-Africanism, more than a century
77
after being formalized, has begun to wane. It is waning due to it losing ground because of
the many social, political, and economic problems African Americans have had and
continue to contend with.
Nonetheless, it is my contention that Pan-Africanism as an idea and movement
will never be rendered completely obsolete. However, a radical shift in perspective is
necessary. As aware as Pan-Africanists are of the history, the personalities, and the raison
d'être of the movement, they would be better off approaching it from a different
perspective. 179 Finally, although not a focus of this thesis, the challenge of globalization
will confront future Pan-Africanist. These challenges include resistance to forms of
marginalization that have evolved through sophisticated social structures that produce
contradictory forms of consciousness. This process has undermined one’s sense of
sociopolitical, cultural and economic belonging in the twenty-first century, resulting in a
lack of clearly defined points that would create international solidarity, due to overt
oppression being more subtle and nuanced. Pan-Africanism, however, is well-suited to
respond. From its very beginnings, its focus has been transregional and global in
character. Future Pan-Africanists will be well serve if they reflect on the legacy of
international solidarity among African people by considering the entire international
system (globalization) in how they relate to it.180 Therefore, the Pan-Africanist of the
twenty-first century, must be expansive in their worldview and in the understanding of a
world which is increasingly becoming more interconnected and interrelated. Pan-
Africanism must become a fluid concept and idea, able to change its tactics and
179 Olayiwola Abegunrin, Sabella Ogbobode Abidde, Pan-Africanism in Modern Times: Challenges, Concerns, and Constraints (London, Lexington Books, 2016), 250. 180 Ibid., 250.
78
perspective based on the current cultural moment without losing its substance or essence,
to fully achieve its goal of African liberation in today’s highly globalized world.
79
BIBILOGRAPHY
Abdul-Raheem, Tajudeen. Pan Africanism: Politics, Economy and Social Change in the
Twenty-First Century. London: Pluto Press, 1996.
Abegunrin, Olayiwola, and Sabella Ogbobode Abidde. Pan-Africanism in Modern Times:
Challenges, Concerns, and Constraints. Lanham: Boulder: New York: London:
Lexington Books, 2016.
Alexander, Michelle. The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of
Colorblindness. New York, NY: New Press, 2012.
Ani, Marimba. Let the Circle Be Unbroken: The Implications of African Spirituality in
the Diaspora. New York: Nkonimfo Publications, 2004.
Ani, Marimba. Yurugu: An African-centered Critique of European Cultural Thought and
Behavior. Baltimore, MD: Afrikan World Books, 2014.
Asante, Molefi Kete. Afrocentricity: the Theory of Social Change. African American
Images, 2003.
Blee, Kathleen M. “Becoming A Racist.” Gender & Society, vol. 10, no. 6, 1996, pp.
680–702.
Brewer, William M. “Some Memories of Dr. W. E. B. DuBois.” The Journal of Negro
History, vol. 53, no. 4, 1968, p. 345.
Brown, Scott. Fighting for Us: Maulana Karenga, the US Organization, and Black
Cultural Nationalism. New York U.P., 2005.
Carmichael, Stokely, and Charles V. Hamilton. Black Power: The Politics of Liberation
in America. New York: Vintage Books, 1992.
80
Carmichael, Stokely, and Michael Thelwell. Ready for Revolution: The Life and
Struggles of Stokely Carmichael (Kwame Ture). New York: Scribner, 2003.
Christian, Mark. "Marcus Garvey and African Unity." Journal of Black Studies 39, no. 2
(2008): 316-31.
Christian, Mark. "Marcus Garvey and the Universal Negro Improvement Association."
Journal of Black Studies 39, no. 2 (2008): 163-65.
Clarke, John Henrik, et al. Marcus Garvey and the Vision of Africa. Baltimore, MD:
Black Classic Press, 2011.
Cooks, C., and Harris, R. Carlos Cooks and Black Nationalism from Garvey to Malcolm:
Dover, MA: Majority Press. 1992
Cronon, Edmund David. Black Moses: The Story of Marcus Garvey and the Universal
Negro Improvement Association. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press,
1981
Delgado, Richard, and Jean Stefancic. Critical Race Theory: An Introduction. 2nd ed.
New York: New York University Press, 2012.
Fanon, Frantz, Richard Philcox, Jean-Paul Sartre, and Homi K. Bhabha. The Wretched of
the Earth. New York City: Grove Press, 2004.
Frazier, Edward Franklin. The Negro in the United States. New York: MacMillan, 1971
Garvey, Marcus, and Amy Jacques. Garvey. The Philosophy and Opinions of Marcus
Garvey, Or, Africa for the Africans. Dover, MA, U.S.A.: Majority Press, 1986.
Girard, Philippe R. Haiti the Tumultuous History: from Pearl of the Caribbean to Broken
Nation. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.
81
Grant, Colin. Negro with a Hat: The Rise and Fall of Marcus Garvey. New York: Oxford
University Press, 2008.
Harriot, Michael. “We Fact-Checked Umar Johnson's Hotep Tantrum with Roland
Martin Because Someone Had To.” The Root, Www.theroot.com, 11 July 2017,
www.theroot.com/we-fact-checked-umar-johnsons-hotep-tantrum-with-roland-
1796798532.
James, Cyril L. The Black Jacobins: Toussaint L'Ouverture and the San Domingo
Revolution. New York: Vintage Books, 1989.
Jeffries, Hasan Kwame. Bloody Lowndes: Civil Rights and Black Power in Alabama's
Black Belt. New York: New York University Press, 2009.
Jeffries, Hasan Kwame. "SNCC, Black Power, and Independent Political Party
Organizing in Alabama, 1964-1966." The Journal of African American History
91, no. 2 (April 1, 2006): 171-93.
Johnson, Robert. Returning Home: Why Blacks Left America For Africa: Interviews with
Black Repatriates. Trenton, New Jersey: Africa World Press, Inc. 1999.
Johnson, Robert. Returning Home: a Century of African-American Repatriation. Trenton,
New Jersey: Africa World Press, Inc. 2006.
Joseph, Peniel E. Stokely: A Life. New York: Basic Books, 2014.
Karenga, Maulana. Introduction to Black Studies. 4th ed. Los Angeles, CA: University of
Sankore Press, 2010.
Kilson, Martin. Apropos of Africa: Sentiments of Negro American Leaders on Africa from
the 1800s to the 1950s. New York: Routledge, 2014.
82
"Kwame Nkrumah Was No Hero, Pan-Africanism Is Dead and Other Stories from a
Unique Presidential Meeting." MG Africa. April 21, 2015. Accessed April 5,
2017. http://mgafrica.com/article/2015-04-21-kwame-nkrumah-was-no-hero-pan-
africanism-is-dead-and-other-stories-from-a-unique-presidential-meeting/.
L., Van Deburg William. Modern Black Nationalism: from Marcus Garvey to Louis
Farrakhan. New York: New York Univ. Press, 1997.
Martin, Tony. The Pan-African Connection: from Slavery to Garvey and Beyond. Dover,
MA: Majority Press, 1983.
Martin, Tony. Race First: The Ideological and Organizational Struggles of Marcus
Garvey and the Universal Negro Improvement Association. Dover, MA: The
Majority Press, 1986.
McCartney, John T. Black Power Ideologies: An Essay in African-American Political
Thought. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1992.
Mazrui, Ali A. Africans. A Triple Heritage. Boston: Little, Brown & Company, 1986
Mitter, Siddhartha. "Chokwe Lumumba, Radical Mayor of Jackson, Miss., Dies at 66." Al
Jazeera America. February 25, 2014. Accessed February 25, 2018.
http://america.aljazeera.com/articles/2014/2/26/chokwe-lumumba-
radicalmayorofjacksonmsdiesat66.html.
Moses, Wilson Jeremiah. Classical Black Nationalism: from the American Revolution to
Marcus Garvey. New York: New York Univ. Press, 1996.
Moses, Wilson Jeremiah. The Golden Age of Black Nationalism: 1850-1925. New York:
Oxford University Press, 1978.
83
Nkrumah, Kwame. The Autobiography of Kwame Nkrumah. New York: International
Publishers, 1981.
Padmore, George. Pan-Africanism or Communism?: The Coming Struggle for Africa.
London: Dobson, 1985.
Painter, Nell Irvin. Creating Black Americans: African-American History and Its
Meaning, 1619 to the Present. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007.
Rodney, Walter. How Europe Underdeveloped Africa. Washington D.C. Howard Univ.
Press, 1982.
Schneider, Nathan. “The Revolutionary Life and Strange Death of a Radical Black
Mayor.” Vice, 17 Apr. 2016, www.vice.com/en_us/article/5gj7da/free-the-land-
v23n2.
Sunkara, Bhaskar. "Free the Land: An Interview with Chokwe Lumumba." Jacobin.
Accessed February 20, 2018. https://www.jacobinmag.com/2014/06/free-the-
land/.
Van Deburg, William L. Modern Black Nationalism: from Marcus Garvey to Louis
Farrakhan. New York: New York University Press, 1997.
Vinson, Robert Trent. The Americans Are Coming!: Dreams of African American
Liberation in Segregationist South Africa. Athens, OH: Ohio University Press,
2012.
Walker, David, and Charles M. Wiltse. David Walkers Appeal, in Four Articles, Together
with a Preamble, to the Coloured Citizens of the World, but in Particular, and
Very Expressly, to Those of the United States of America. New York: Hill and
Wang, 1965
84
Wilson, Amos. Afrikan-Centered Consciousness versus the New World Order:
Garveyism in the Age of Globalism. New York: Afrikan World InfoSystems,
1999.
Wilson, Amos N. Blueprint for Black Power: A Moral, Political, and Economic
Imperative for the Twenty-first Century. New York: Afrikan World InfoSystems,
2011.