MEETING AGENDA

@WesternRCA

MEETING AGENDA

TIME/DATE: 12:30 p.m. / Monday, March 7, 2022

This meeting is being conducted in accordance with AB 361 due to state or local officials recommending measures to promote social distancing.

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Chair – Natasha Johnson Vice Chair – Jeff Hewitt

Kevin Jeffries, County of Riverside, District 1 Karen Spiegel, County of Riverside, District 2

Chuck Washington, County of Riverside, District 3 V. Manuel Perez, County of Riverside, District 4

Jeff Hewitt, County of Riverside, District 5 Colleen Wallace / David Happe, City of Banning Julio Martinez / Lloyd White, City of Beaumont

Jeff Cervantez / Bill Davis, City of Calimesa Larry Greene / Jeremy Smith, City of Canyon Lake

Tony Daddario / Wes Speake, City of Corona Clint Lorimore / Todd Rigby, City of Eastvale

Joe Males / Linda Krupa, City of Hemet Lorena Barajas Bisbee / Leslie Altamirano, City of Jurupa Valley

Natasha Johnson / Bob Magee, City of Lake Elsinore Lesa Sobek / Bob Karwin, City of Menifee

David Marquez / Ulises Cabrera, City of Moreno Valley Jonathan Ingram / Christi White, City of Murrieta

Kevin Bash / Katherine Aleman, City of Norco David Starr Rabb / Malcolm Corona, City of Perris

Patricia Lock Dawson / Steve Hemenway, City of Riverside Crystal Ruiz / Phil Ayala, City of San Jacinto

Maryann Edwards / James Stewart, City of Temecula Ben J. Benoit / Joseph Morabito, City of Wildomar

http://www.facebook.com/westernrca

http://www.twitter.com/westernrca

http://www.instagram.com/westernrca

BLANK

WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY REGIONAL CONSERVATION AUTHORITY www.wrc-rca.org

MEETING AGENDA*

*Actions may be taken on any item listed on the agenda

12:30 p.m. Monday, March 7, 2022

This meeting is being conducted in accordance with AB 361 due to state or local officials recommending measures to promote social distancing.

INSTRUCTIONS FOR ELECTRONIC PARTICIPATION

Join Zoom Meeting https://rctc.zoom.us/j/83503464977

Call in: +1 669 900 6833

Meeting ID: 835 0346 4977

One tap mobile: +16699006833,,83503464977#

For members of the public wishing to submit comment in connection with the Board of Directors Meeting please email written comments to the Clerk of the Board at [email protected] and your comments will be made part of the official record of the proceedings as long as the comment is received before the end of the meeting’s public comment period. Members of the public may also make public comments through their telephone or Zoom connection when recognized by the Chair.

In compliance with the Brown Act and Government Code Section 54957.5, agenda materials distributed 72 hours prior to the meeting, which are public records relating to open session agenda items, will be available for inspection by members of the public prior to the meeting on the RCA’s website, www.wrc-rca.org..

In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, Government Code Section 54954.2, Executive Order N-29-20, and the Federal Transit Administration Title VI, please contact the Clerk of the Board at (951) 787-7141 if special assistance is needed to participate in a Board meeting, including accessibility and translation services. Assistance is provided free of charge. Notification of at least 48 hours prior to the meeting time will assist staff in assuring reasonable arrangements can be made to provide assistance at the meeting.

1. CALL TO ORDER

2. ROLL CALL

3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

http://www.wrc-rca.org/

https://rctc.zoom.us/j/83503464977

mailto:[email protected]

http://www.wrc-rca.org/

Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority Board Meeting Agenda March 7, 2022 Page 2

4. PUBLIC COMMENTS – Under the Brown Act, the Board should not take action on or discuss matters raised during public comment portion of the agenda that are not listed on the agenda. The Board Members may refer such matters to staff for factual information or to be placed on the subsequent agenda for consideration.

5. ADDITIONS / REVISIONS – The Board may add an item to the agenda after making a finding

that there is a need to take immediate action on the item and that the item came to the attention of the Board subsequent to the posting of the agenda. An action adding an item to the agenda requires 2/3 vote of the Board. If there are less than 2/3 of the Board Members present, adding an item to the agenda requires a unanimous vote. Added items will be placed for discussion at the end of the agenda.

6. CONSENT CALENDAR – All matters on the Consent Calendar will be approved in a single motion

unless a Board Member(s) requests separate action on specific item(s).

6A. AB 361 DETERMINATION Page 1

Overview

This item is for the Board to adopt Resolution No. 2022-003, “A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority Authorizing Virtual Board and Committee Meetings Pursuant to AB 361”.

6B. APPROVAL OF MINUTES – FEBRUARY 7, 2022

Page 6

6C. WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY MULTIPLE SPECIES HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN FEE COLLECTION REPORT FOR DECEMBER 2021

Page 20 Overview

This item is for the Board of Directors to receive and file the Western Riverside County

Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) Fee Collection Report for December 2021.

6D. QUARTERLY INVESTMENT REPORT

Page 22 Overview

This item is for the Board of Directors to receive and file the Quarterly Investment

Report for the quarter ended December 31, 2021.


6E. ACQUISITIONS STATUS REPORT Page 73

Overview

This item is for the Board of Directors to receive and file the acquisitions status report as of December 31, 2021.

6F. JOINT PROJECT REVIEW STATUS REPORT

Page 78 Overview

This item is for the Board of Directors to receive and file the Joint Project Review (JPR)

status report as of January 31, 2022.

6G. QUARTERLY PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT METRICS REPORT, OCTOBER - DECEMBER 2021 Page 83

Overview

This item is for the Board of Directors to receive and file report summarizing the Quarterly Public Engagement Metrics.

6H. CONSULTANT REPORTS - FISCAL YEAR 2022 SECOND QUARTER

Page 87 Overview

This item is for the Board of Directors to receive and file the consultant reports for

Fiscal Year 2022 Second Quarter.

7. STATE AND FEDERAL LEGISLATIVE UPDATE Page 110

Overview

This item is for the Board of Directors to receive and file an update on state and federal legislative affairs.

8. WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY MULTIPLE SPECIES HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN 2020

ANNUAL REPORT Page 114

Overview

This item is for the Board of Directors to receive and file the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan 2020 Annual Report.


9. PROPOSED AMENDED BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING SCHEDULE Page 324

Overview

This item is for the Board of Directors to consider a change in start time to 12:00 p.m. for Board Meetings and adopt an amended 2022 Board of Directors Meeting Schedule.

10. PRESENTATION – SPECIES OF THE MONTH

11. BOARD OF DIRECTORS / EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT

Overview

This item provides the opportunity for the Board of Directors and the Executive Director to

report on attended meetings/conferences and any other items related to Board activities.

12. ADJOURNMENT The next meeting of the Board of Directors is scheduled to be held on Monday,

April 4, 2022.

AGENDA ITEM 6A

BLANK

Agenda Item 6A

WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY REGIONAL CONSERVATION AUTHORITY

DATE: March 7, 2022

TO: Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority

FROM: Lisa Mobley, Administrative Services Manager/Clerk of the Board

THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director

SUBJECT: AB 361 Determination

STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Board to adopt Resolution No. 2022-003, “A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority Authorizing Virtual Board and Committee Meetings Pursuant to AB 361”.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Since the onset of the COVID-19 in early 2020, California government agencies have been able to continue to discharge their legal responsibilities through the use of virtual teleconferencing platforms such as Zoom to hold public meetings that enabled agencies to meet and conduct business, comply with social distancing orders and most importantly, provide access to the public. In many cases, virtual meetings have actually enhanced public participation, particularly in larger counties including Riverside County where traveling to a public meeting can be inconvenient or require traveling a long distance. Both the RCA and RCTC have been meeting on Zoom since March of 2020, when many Executive Orders were issued by Governor Newsom in response to the pandemic. One such order altered Brown Act requirements to allow for virtual meetings. Although transmission, hospitalization and death rates from COVID-19 have sharply declined since the original onset of the pandemic and subsequent Delta and Omicron Variant surges, an air of uncertainty remains regarding the pandemic and many counties continue to recommend masking inside and social distancing. Given that environment and a desire to continue allowing for the flexibility of holding virtual meetings, the Legislature recently approved, and Governor Newsom signed, Assembly Bill 361 (AB 361) to temporarily allow for virtual meetings under proscribed circumstances. AB 361 AB 361 amends the Brown Act to allow local legislative bodies to continue using teleconferencing and virtual meeting technology in certain circumstances. Under the Bill, legislative bodies can continue to meet remotely as long as there is a “proclaimed state of emergency” and the Board of Directors can make either of the following findings: (a) state or local officials have imposed or recommended measures to promote social distancing or (b) whether as a result of the

1

Agenda Item 6A

emergency, meeting in person would present imminent risks to the health or safety of attendees. Even though cases have dropped, AB 361 is expressly intended “to protect the health and safety of civil servants and the public and does not preference the experience of members of the public who might be able to attend a meeting in a physical location over members of the public who cannot travel or attend that meeting in a physical location” because of physical status. The Governor proclaimed a State of Emergency on March 4, 2020, related to the COVID-19 pandemic, which continues to exist to this day. Further, State officials continue to recommend social distancing, especially for immunocomprimised and sensitive groups. AB 361 requires specific procedural safeguards for the public. To accommodate individuals during these teleconferences and virtual meetings, a public comment period will be offered where the public can address the legislative body directly in real time. Additionally, public comments will be allowed up until the public comment period is closed at the meetings. The agenda will include information on the manner in which the public may access the meeting and provide comments remotely. If technical problems arise that result in the public’s access being disrupted, the legislative body will not take any vote or other official action until the technical disruption is corrected and public access is restored. The attached Resolution allows the Board to implement AB 361 by making the findings discussed above. This findings will be in effect for 30 days or until the Board makes findings that the conditions listed therein no longer exist, whichever is shorter. The findings can be extended by the Board upon a finding that conditions supporting the findings included in the Resolution still exist. The authorization to meet remotely will also apply to any Committees that meet during the 30-day effective period. AB 361 will allow for virtual meetings during other state-proclaim emergencies, such as earthquakes or wildfires, where physical attendance may present a risk. AB 361 is scheduled to sunset January 1, 2024. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution No. 22-003, “A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority Authorizing Virtual Board and Committee Meetings Pursuant to AB 361”. Attachment: Resolution No. 22-003

2

RESOLUTION NO. 2022-003

A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY REGIONAL CONSERVATION AUTHORITY AUTHORIZING VIRTUAL BOARD AND COMMITTEE

MEETINGS PURSUANT TO AB 361

WHEREAS, the Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority (“Authority”) is committed to preserving and nurturing public access and participation in meetings of the Board of Directors; and

WHEREAS, all meetings of the Authority’s legislative bodies, including its Board of Directors and Executive Committee, are open and public, as required by the Ralph M. Brown Act (Cal. Gov. Code 54950 – 54963), so that any member of the public may attend and participate in the Authority’s meetings; and

WHEREAS, starting in March 2020, in response to the spread of COVID-19 in the State of California, the Governor issued a number of executive orders aimed at containing the COVID-19 virus; and

WHEREAS, among other things, these orders waived certain requirements of the Brown Act to allow legislative bodies to meet virtually; and

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Governor’s executive orders, the Authority has been holding virtual meetings during the pandemic in the interest of protecting the health and safety of the public, District staff and Directors; and

WHEREAS, the Governor’s executive order related to the suspension of certain provisions of the Brown Act expired on September 30, 2021; and

WHEREAS, on September 16, 2021, the Governor signed AB 361 (in effect as of October 1, 2021 – Government Code Section 54953(e)), which allows legislative bodies to meet virtually provided there is a state of emergency, and either (1) state or local officials have imposed or recommended measures to promote social distancing; or (2) the legislative body determines by majority vote that meeting in person would present imminent risks to the health and safety of attendees; and

WHEREAS, such conditions now exist in the Authority, specifically, a state of emergency has been proclaimed related to COVID-19 and state or local officials are recommending measures to promote social distancing,

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY REGIONAL CONSERVATION AUTHORITY DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

3

Section 1. Recitals. The Recitals set forth above are true and correct and are incorporated into this Resolution by this reference.

Section 2. Findings. Consistent with the provisions of Government Code Section 54953(e), the Board of Directors finds and determines that (1) a state of emergency related to COVID-19 is currently in effect and (2) state or local officials have recommended measures to promote social distancing in connection with COVID-19.

Section 3. Full and Fair Access: In making the findings included herein the Board of Directors specifically relies on Section 8(b) of Stats.2021, c.165 (A.B.361), § 3, eff. Sept. 16, 2021.) which provides as follows:

(b) The Legislature finds and declares that [the changes made by AB 361 to]

Section 54953 of the Government Code, all increase and potentially limit the public’s right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies within the meaning of Section 3 of Article I of the California Constitution. Pursuant to that constitutional provision, the Legislature makes the following findings to demonstrate the interest protected by this limitation and the need for protecting that interest:

(1) By removing the requirement that public meetings be conducted at a primary physical location with a quorum of members present, this act protects the health and safety of civil servants and the public and does not preference the experience of members of the public who might be able to attend a meeting in a physical location over members of the public who cannot travel or attend that meeting in a physical location.

(2) By removing the requirement for agendas to be placed at the location of each public official participating in a public meeting remotely, including from the member’s private home or hotel room, this act protects the personal, private information of public officials and their families while preserving the public’s right to access information concerning the conduct of the people’s business.

Section 4. Remote Teleconference Meetings: Based on the findings and

determinations included herein, the Board authorizes and directs any of its legislative bodies, including without limitation its Board of Directors, Executive Committee, and Stakeholders Committee, to conduct remote teleconference meetings under the provisions of Government Code Section 54953(e) and that such bodies shall provide public access to their meetings as provided in Section 54953(e).

Section 5. Effective Date of Resolution. This Resolution shall take effect upon adoption and shall be effective for 30 days unless earlier extended by a majority vote of the Board of Directors in accordance with Section 5 of this Resolution.

Section 6. Extension by Motion. The Board of Directors may extend the application of this Resolution by motion and majority vote by up to 30 days at a time, provided that it makes all necessary findings consistent with and pursuant to the requirements of Section 54953(e)(3).

4

APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 7th day of March, 2022.

_____________________________________ Natasha Johnson, Chair Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority

ATTEST: _________________________________ Lisa Mobley, Clerk of the Board Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority

5

BLANK

AGENDA ITEM 6B

MINUTES

BLANK


BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING MINUTES Monday, February 7, 2022

1. CALL TO ORDER

The Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority Board of Directors Meeting was called to order by Chair Natasha Johnson at 12:31 p.m., via Zoom Meeting ID 820 2417 6588, in accordance with AB 361 due to state or local officials recommending measures to promote social distancing.

2. ROLL CALL

Board of Directors/Alternates Present Board of Directors Absent Kevin Jeffries Lorena Barajas Bisbee V. Manuel Perez Karen Spiegel Natasha Johnson David Marquez Chuck Washington Lesa Sobek Jeff Hewitt Jonathan Ingram Colleen Wallace Kevin Bash Julio Martinez David Starr Rabb Jeff Cervantez Patricia Lock Dawson Larry Greene Crystal Ruiz Wes Speake Maryann Edwards Clint Lorimore Ben J. Benoit Joe Males

3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Board Member Lorimore.

4. PUBLIC COMMENTS

Michele Staples, a representative for the Olsen Canyon property, provided comments for Closed Session Agenda Item 6B. Olsen Canyon submitted an appraisal for review by RCA’s appraiser and received substantive comments in response. The appraisal is now in the process of being revised in response to the appraiser’s comments. The revised appraisal was intended to be completed prior to today’s meeting, but it will not be available until later this week. Olsen Canyon would like to request this matter be calendared for discussion until the February 16th Executive Committee, as RCA would have the benefit of the revised appraisal. Matthew Ferree, a representative from Murrieta KLC Holdings 130 LLC, provided comments for Agenda Item 7G. There is an existing project, JPR Application #14-10-28-01, that has been in the negotiation process for a fee credit which was rejected based on a technicality in the past. The MSHCP Mitigation Fee Implementation Manual as presented will prevent properties from

6

Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority Board Meeting Minutes February 7, 2022 Page 2

pursing a fee credit. Language used in the manual will prevent properties from seeking an appropriate fee credit.

5. ADDITIONS / REVISIONS

There were no additions or revisions to the agenda.

6. CLOSED SESSION

Ed Sauls, a member of the public, reiterated Michele Staples comment regarding the Olsen

Canyon property and asked that the Board delay action or discussion until the revised appraisal is received. Lisa Mobley, Administrative Services Manager/Clerk of the Board, noted that written comments were received from Michele Staples and were distributed to the Board. At this time, Steve DeBaun, legal counsel, announced the Board would be going in to Closed Session to discuss the three property items on the agenda.

6A. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 Agency Negotiator: Executive Director or Designee Item Property Description Property Owner Buyer(s) 1 283-060-001, 283-060-002,

283-100-013, 283-100-021, 283-110-013, 283-110-035, 283-380-002, 283-380-003, 283-380-004, 283-380-005, 283-390-004, 283-390-006,

& 390-080-001

Olsen Canyon Properties, LLC RCA

2 283-210-001 Ron Burek and Heather Burek, Trustees of the Ron and Heather

Burek Living Trust

RCA

3 555-130-010 (portion)

Honey Pacifica Holdings, LLC RCA

6B. REPORT OUT FROM CLOSED SESSION

There were no announcements from Closed Session.

7. CONSENT CALENDAR - All matters on the Consent Calendar will be approved in a single motion

unless a Board Member(s) requests separate action on specific item(s). Michele Staples, a member of the public, expressed concern about Agenda Item 7G. Ms. Staples expressed thanks to the RCA for the use of clarifying language on the ability of the county and

7


cities to accept pre-payment fees. As there have already been two MSHCP fee increases, it is requested that RCA apply pre-payment of fees retroactively to those developers that had asked to pay their fees in advance previously. It is also requested that RCA pull the fee credit section from the MSHCP Mitigation Fee Manual and today’s Consent Calendar approval. There are several inconsistencies with the text of the MSHCP, and it is advised that an advisory committee be established including members of the regulated community to re-work the language of the fee credit provisions. Ed Sauls, a member of the public, expressed a similar request to Ms. Staples, excluding the sections of the manual in Chapter 2 regarding fee credits and standards applied to when a fee credit is allowed to be used. These sections require further thought and discussion. A key issue is if the applicant didn’t include the request for a fee credit in the HANs or JPR, RCA is not obligated to reimburse the owner for setting aside the land through fee credits. Chair Johnson requested Agenda Item 7G be pulled from the Consent Calendar for further discussion. M/S/C (Benoit/Ingram) to approve the following Consent Calendar items.

7A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES – JANUARY 10, 2022

7B. AB 361 DETERMINATION

1) Reaffirm the findings in Resolution No. 2021-016, “A Resolution of the Board of

Directors of the Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority Authorizing Virtual Board and Committee Meetings Pursuant to AB 361”. Those findings are as follows: a. The Governor proclaimed a State of Emergency on March 4, 2020, related

to the COVID-19 pandemic, which continues to exist today; and b. State or local officials have recommended measures to promote social

distancing.

7C. QUARTERLY INVESTMENT REPORT

This item is for the Board of Directors to receive and file the Quarterly Investment Report for the quarter ended September 30, 2021.

7D. ACQUISITIONS STATUS REPORT

This item is for the Board of Directors to receive and file the acquisitions status report

as of November 30, 2021.

7E. JOINT PROJECT REVIEW STATUS REPORT

8


This item is for the Board of Directors to receive and file the Joint Project Review (JPR) monthly status report as of November 30, 2021.

7F. SINGLE SIGNATURE AUTHORITY REPORT

This item is for the Board of Directors to receive and file the Single Signature Authority

report for the second quarter ended December 31, 2021.

7G. MSHCP MITIGATION FEE IMPLEMENTATION MANUAL UPDATE

Chair Johnson noted that there was three separate pieces of correspondence that was forwarded to Board Members. This manual update for consideration, is not a policy direction, this is to provide the member agencies an update. The Board can make additional recommendations or direction to staff based on policy items, if necessary. This discussion could also take place at the upcoming Stakeholders Committee in March. Aaron Hake, Interim Regional Conservation Deputy Executive Director, confirmed that the purpose of this item is to update the manual based on the comments received from member agencies after the 6-month review process. This is an administrative document that was adopted by the Board along with the Nexus Study. At any time, the Board can direct staff to review any individual component of the manual and bring it back to the Board for approval. The elements raised in public comment today are not new, in one form or another, they have been in place since 2016 when the Board first adopted the fee credit policy. Board Member Ingram asked general counsel if it was possible to separate out elements of the manual. Steve DeBaun, general counsel, noted at this point, the entire manual is before consideration for the Board, there aren’t significant changes to the fee credit portions, so if it was removed there wouldn’t be any substantive changes to the way the fee credits are handled by the member agencies. Board Member Ingram wanted to know how RCA would address the public concerns expressed while moving forward. Mr. DeBaun noted there are several different options. The first option being to approve the changes presented today, and the Board could then direct further review of the manual or the fee credit verbiage to other committees in the agency. Another option would be to send the entire manual back including updates to another committee for consideration. Board Member Ingram expressed not wanting to hold up the approval of the manual, but the issues brought forward by the public should be addressed, they are legitimate concerns. Mr. DeBaun recommended that the item should move forward as presented and if requested by the Board, staff can review the fee credit language through subsequent actions through committees or the Board.

9


Board Member Ingram asked what the timeline would be for review of the fee credit portion. Anne Mayer, Executive Director, noted that if the Board was to approve the manual today as is, then RCA and all member agencies would have a working document upon which to make decisions. Based on the letter and comments received yesterday and this morning, RCA can evaluate those comments, specifically whether a developer needs to identify a fee credit request at the JPR stage of the process over the next month. There is also a Stakeholders Committee meeting scheduled for March. RCA staff would be able to discuss the issues presented today to have a full understanding, bring this topic to the Stakeholders Committee meeting in March, and then come back to Board in April with input and feedback on what was discussed. Board Member Ingram wanted to clarify that rather than 6 months to review this, the turnaround could be 90 days, as alluded to previously, this policy has been in place since 2016 so there shouldn’t be a rush other than the fee structure portion that this is being amended. Ms. Mayer noted that the 6-month timeline was the committee effort with member agencies to address their administrative comments. With respect to being asked to review this policy today, it can certainly be done in less than 90 days, as the Stakeholders Committee in March would be a great jumping off point. Ms. Mayer clarified regarding the pre-payment of fees; RCA allows for the pre-payment of fees only if the member agency allows the pre-payment of fees. If member agencies do not allow the pre-payment of fees, RCA cannot accept the payment. If the Board is asking RCA staff to review that portion, it would take longer than 90 days, because not all member agencies are willing to accept pre-payments. Board Member Hewitt is concerned with the sequence of events, as in a few items we could be talking about an issue that goes against what was just passed. Ms. Mayer acknowledgement the comments and noted that even if the Board provided direction in the subsequent item that is different from the current manual, RCA staff would have to reconcile those and come back to the Board. If RCA staff is given direction to proceed on the fee credit item coming up, it will take months to evaluate the process and acquisition. In the meantime, a fee manual is needed for the member agencies to be able to operate. If this item isn’t adopted today, then RCA isn’t adopting the administrative changes that the cities and the county have requested for their own benefit. Lisa Mobley, Administrative Services Manager/Clerk of the Board, noted that the RCA did receive three written comments on Agenda Item 7G from Greg Lowther, Geoff Willis, and Michele Staples. Board Member Ingram asked that a timeline be added to the subsequent motion to let the Board know when this item would be coming back.

10


M/S/C (Johnson/Speake) to: Approve the update to the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) Mitigation Fee Implementation Manual as presented and give direction to the Stakeholders Committee to start to look at the subsequent items to start the process, providing an update to the Board in April. Abstain: Males

7H. STATE AND FEDERAL LEGISLATIVE UPDATE

This item is for the Board of Directors to receive and file an update on state and federal

legislative affairs.

8. INTRODUCTION OF STAKEHOLDER COMMITTEE TO BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Chair Johnson reminded Board Members during the management transition last year, one of the top priorities was expanding resources and communication, as well as relaunching the Stakeholders Committee. The Stakeholders Committee will be used a tool and resource for the Board. The committee is intended to bring the community together, serving with various experience. The Stakeholders Committee members were invited to introduce themselves. Dan Silver from the Endangered Habitats League. Allison Renck from the Anza Aguanga area. Cara Lacey representing The Nature Conservancy. Michael Viramontes from the Rivers & Land Conservancy. Bruce Colbert the Executive Director of the Property Owners Association of Riverside County. Nicole Padron from the Rivers & Lands Conservancy. Pam Nelson from the local Sierra Club. Tuba Ebru Ozdi representing the Pechanga Band of Indians. Ed Sauls the President of The Sauls Company. Matthew Liesemeyer from 4M Engineering and Development. Teri Biancardi representing the Meadowview Homeowners Association. Julie Beeman representing the Building Industry Association.

11


Brian Bush the Vice President of Diversified Pacific. Ileene Anderson a Senior Scientist at the Center for Biological Diversity. Rick Neugebauer the President of the Santa Ana Watershed Association. Chair Johnson expressed gratitude on behalf of the Board to the members of the Stakeholders Committee for their service. The diverse group should lend to serving RCA well. Board Member Speake thanked the selection committee for a great job in choosing the Stakeholders Committee members. It’s important to see the many names and faces that were around when the MSHCP was first formed. Board Member Sobek welcomed the members of the Stakeholders Committee and thanked them for wanting to be part of this process.

This item is for the Chair to introduce the members of the RCA Stakeholders Committee.

At this time, Board Members Spiegel, Jeffries, Wallace, Males, and Ruiz left the meeting.

9. CITY OF MORENO VALLEY FEE CREDIT REQUEST FOR WORLD LOGISTICS CENTER

Lisa Mobley, Administrative Services Manager/Clerk of the Board, noted that six letters

regarding this agenda item were received from George Hague, Greg Lowther, Drew Feldmann, Dan Silver, Susan Nash, and Gary Washburn and forwarded to the Board. Steven Quintanilla, Interim City Attorney for the City of Moreno Valley, agrees that the implementation manual should be working and living document to accommodate changes in land use strategies regarding development, land conservation, and habitat conservation. It’s important to be flexible and open minded when an opportunity is presented that would help meet RCA’s policy goals and mission. This opportunity to set aside a little more than 2,700 acres of land in perpetuity, could be beneficial in the perspective of the MSHCP. The Board should ask staff to explore this opportunity with city counterparts, colleagues, Highland Fairview, and other local stakeholders. While the RCA does not have any obligations under the settlement agreement, that should not be the determining factor as to whether the provisions would be beneficial to the MSHCP. George Hague, Conservation Chair of the Moreno Valley Group of the Sierra Club, expressed concern with the MSHCP and concept of internal buffers when it comes to protecting major reserves like the San Jacinto wildlife area. Based on the provided staff report, the opportunity to provide real buffers in habitat on the eastern side of the San Jacinto wildlife area, and even some real external buffers, from the World Logistics Center on the northern side. The City of Moreno Valley has plans for The Quail Ranch to be commercial, this in turn would cause Hot Springs to eventually follow suit, especially with Gillman Springs Road improvements.

12


Now is the time for the RCA to make it possible to acquire large continuous plots under single ownership, allowing for several Gillman Springs under crossings and linkages to Mystic Lake and other areas of the San Jacinto wildlife area, as well as providing important connections to local mountains. These donated lands will also provide significant habitat to the eastern part of the San Jacinto wildlife area. The Sierra Club hopes the Board will support staff’s alternative two, to explore alternative mechanisms to make the donations happen while honoring the commitment to the MSHCP. Dan Silver, Endangered Habitats League, noted that while it is a unique opportunity to acquire large parcels under a single ownership, there are major problems with the fee credit approach. The Board is urged to direct staff to explore alternative mechanisms for bringing these parcels into the system. The alternative approaches can be consistent with current RCA policies and practices regarding payment of mitigation fees and with continued RCA discretion over which properties are to be acquired. Highland Fairview and other parties should be part of the discussion in a collaborative approach. Susan Nash, President of The Friends of the Northern San Jacinto Valley, suggested that because the original HANs was under Section B, which does not allow off-site lands to be acquired and receive a fee credit, that the process be changed or re-filed by Highland Fairview as an evaluation for which a developer application is not intended to be filed. That process wouldn’t have a restriction in the MSHCP or the policy regarding what incentives may be offered. This would give structure to the negotiations under a joint project acquisition review process. Ed Sauls, a member of the public, noted that it was appropriate that full consideration be given to the proposal from the city and the landowner. Iddo Benzeevi, Highland Fairview, noted his support of the City of Moreno Valley’s request to consider the contribution of land for conservation in lieu of MSHCP fees. These properties provide a valuable addition to conservation within Riverside County and support RCA’s mission. This is a unique opportunity to add much needed land in Western Riverside County for conservation that otherwise would not have been obtainable. Garret Sauls, a member of the public, noted that this is a unique opportunity for the RCA to acquire a significant amount of land all under one ownership. This land is approximately 3% of the additional reserve lands that are necessary for RCA. The pros outweigh the cons on this proposal, however, there are significant challenges proposed to RCA including fiscal impact. It would be extremely difficult for RCA to complete Core 3 and complete the linkage without this acreage. RCA staff and Board are strongly suggested to look at potentially acquiring this acreage by fee credit or other means. Ileene Anderson, Center for Biological Diversity, notes there is a great benefit in bringing these lands into the reserve system. There should be ways to make this happen and staff should be directed to find ways to bring these lands into the system.

13


Tom Paulek, California Department of Fish and Wildlife (retired), noted due to his experience with the San Jacinto wildlife area, he was very knowledgeable concerning the wildlife resources in Western Riverside County, the County Wildlife Program, and the MSHCP. It is important for RCA Board Members and the public to understand and recognize that the MSHCP is an incidental take permit, pursuant to the Federal and State Endangered Species Act. The MSHCP permits or allows the killing and destruction of the habitats of 146 species of plants and animals throughout Western Riverside County. In return, for the granting of the incidental take permit, Riverside County, the cities, state, and federal wildlife agencies are obligated to acquire 153,000 acres of land to affect wildlife habitat connectivity between the already existing public land conservation reserves. The San Jacinto wildlife area is the most diverse of the existing conservation reserves in the MSHCP system, providing habitat for 65-70 of the 146 MSHCP species subject to incidental takes. Whether the RCA or the Department of Fish and Wildlife are the grantee of the donation lands, the RCA would be able to credit the full 2,737 acres of donation to the land acquisition obligations under the MSHCP incidental take permits. Aaron Hake, Interim Regional Conservation Deputy Executive Director, provided a presentation on the City of Moreno (City) Valley Fee Credit Request: World Logistics Center. The Board had previously considered this item at the December Board Closed Session under property negotiations and had declined to negotiate for the properties. Last month, it was requested this item be revisited in open session. The City has now updated their request with additional acreage proposed for conservation and some additional details on how the City would like the transaction to occur. The City’s request is that RCA approve a fee credit for the World Logistic Center in exchange for approximately 2,700 acres of conservation land. In general, the properties proposed for conservation have potential conservation value to the MSHCP, through much due diligence is still needed as some properties may have management issues that will require vetting and features that may not be suitable for the reserve. The City has proposed this fee credit because of a settlement agreement between the applicant Highland Fairview and Friends of the Northern San Jacinto Valley, RCA is not party to the settlement agreement or the litigation that proceeded it, therefore this Board is not bound by the terms of the settlement agreement. The City’s formal request letter makes numerous assumptions that public agencies such as the RCA will take actions to implement the settlement agreement and makes several claims about the conditions of the properties. The City’s request is not compliant with the RCA Fee Credit Policy in two aspects, and therefore staff recommends denial of the City’s request. The two aspects of the policy that are the basis of the staff recommendation are not new and have been part of the policy since 2016. The two requirements are the on-site conservation for the project and that the fee credit be requested as part of the Joint Project Review (JPR). The purpose of this policy is to provide incentives to landowners who are looking to develop their property and are dedicating some of the property on the project site for conservation, it’s a financial incentive the MSHCP contemplates. The RCA Board has also adopted fiscal policies, including a budget and the 2020 Nexus Study, that puts the organization on a more sustainable and responsible financial footing. It’s an

14


important reminder to the Board that the fees that are paid by developers to the City or the county, don’t just pay for land acquisition for RCA, but also the long- and short-term management cost for the properties that have been acquired. One of the most significant aspects is the permanent endowment which is supposed to take care of the perpetual management of the habitat acquired during the acquisition period over the next several years. When a fee credit is offered, that credit would take from the endowment and the near-term management costs. Based on the Board’s adopted policies, staff recommends the City’s request be denied, however, if the Board would like to entertain this transaction, staff has come up with two alternatives. The first alternative is to direct staff to develop a new fee credit policy and bring it back to the Board for consideration. The second alternative is to negotiate a transaction for the ~2,700 acres aside from what the policy is today. Steve DeBaun, general counsel, noted that this is a limited item for discussion, and made it clear that the purpose of this agenda item is only for the Board to direct staff whether to further consider the fee credit request from the City of Moreno Valley. Any further action on the fee credit request, has not been agenized for this meeting. Board Member Washington noted that since this issue was first visited in December, his position has not changed. The input from the environmental community is valued, out of respect for the process and Board policy, this does not adhere to the process and the fee credit would take a bite out of the bottom fiscal line. Consequently, giving a fee credit to this project would further exacerbate the problem with more trucks on the already congested freeways adding to poor quality and harming the environment. Board Member Ingram noted his advocacy in lieu of fees in anyway possible. The Board has made exceptions to that policy in the past. Projects throughout the County have already gotten entitlements and are able to build if they choose to. The concern is, there is a need to conserve this property. The purpose behind the plan was to assemble the linkage in total, to ensure there was a synergy between environment and development. This property is a critical piece of land, that’s extraordinarily expensive. This needs to be reviewed, and where there are opportunities for land that already have entitlements, the Board should be able to come back and see the value that it brings. As the plan is being assembled, RCA is creating value around islands. This is something that should come back for discussion, not for just this project, but any project. Board Member Sobek appreciated all the public comments received on this item. It may be in the best interests to continue this item for further discussion, perhaps even with the Executive Committee. There are several questions and concerns surrounding this including the endowment, the sustainable long-term costs of the project, determining what would be financially feasible for RCA, the time and effort required of staff, and who would pay for that time. The decision on this shouldn’t be hurried and should be continued. Board Member Nash reflected on the bigger picture, where on the freeway there are sometimes two to three lanes of back-to-back trucks. While it’s understandable the RCA wants to have this

15


land, and some environmental groups are trying to protect the land, it does feel like there is some picking and choosing when it comes to areas of conservation. The most upsetting part of this is the trading of 2,700 acres, that RCA does want, with hundreds of miles of congestion.

At this time, Board Member Bash left the meeting.

Board Member Hewitt stated he tends to get nervous whenever there are this many

conservationists in the same meeting as he is on the opposite side in favor of more houses and bringing jobs to the Riverside County. Although, this item is not about whether the RCA approves of the World Logistics Center, that has already been litigated. This agenda item is about fulfilling the main objective of the RCA, to acquire suitable land so the County isn’t one paved over parking lot. Gillman Springs Road is very dangerous and if this property is let go it will be purchased by someone else, if it is brought into RCA, it would help keep the traffic down. The newly built wildlife undercrossing by the 60 trucks lanes would feed into this property, which is a great way to go. The total added acreage in the last two years is probably less than the 2,700 acres offered. The RCA is behind the goal and the cost of land in Southern California isn’t going to be getting any cheaper going forward. The RCA has a city and a property owner in total agreement, as well as a host of environmental advocates saying they’d love to see the lands added to the system. Board Member Hewitt made a motion for Alternative #2, negotiate for the ~2,700 acres outside of current policy. Board Member Speake thanked staff for the report, it was very clear and concisely laid out the issues. Past experiences show the value in acquiring a large piece of land. However, the financial determent that could fall to the RCA is substantial. Just as land isn’t going to be getting cheaper, managing these lands won’t get cheaper. The RCA needs to protect its’ endowment and how the lands and projects are funded going forward, is as important. Board Member Speake wanted to confirm that the agreement stipulated that this land is to go into some sort of protection, whether through the RCA or the California Department of Fish and Wildlife. Mr. Hake confirmed that was correct. Board Member Speake also wanted to confirm that the agreement between the two parties had some sort of endowment for these lands to be taken care of in perpetuity. Anne Mayer, Executive Director, noted that the settlement agreement had a lot of requirements in respect to what happens to the land when and if it receives a fee credit and to whom it goes. It should be noted that RCA is not responsible for implementation of the settlement agreement, so there is caution in speaking about what the agreement requires. The focus of the RCA would be on the City’s request related to acquiring the property through a fee credit or alternative #2. Any lands that the RCA would acquire, would go into conservation in perpetuity. Board Member Ingram thought it would be important to allow the attorney who drafted the agreement to weigh in. Chair Johnson noted before that, it was important to get to all the Board Members as it was their time to speak.

16


Chair Johnson was impressed with the public participation and the comments provided. Understanding that this is a vital part of the RCA’s acreage allocation and how the success of the plan is formulated. At face value this appears to be something that the RCA should jump on based on the size, but there is also a focus on changing the reputation of the RCA and the way it does business following the policies and procedures. The RCA shouldn’t be making decisions on what is attractive to the agency. If the policy needs to change so this type of action is incorporated, that’s what should be done. Chair Johnson made an alternative motion that the RCA deny the City of Moreno Valley’s fee credit request for the World Logistics Center, with the addition that this does need to be brought back to the Stakeholder Committee and policy going forward. Board Member Washington seconded the motion. Board Member Ingram noted that while he had no other comments, the Board is aware how he has felt about this subject for some time about the policy itself. There are some inaccuracies in what is being stated here today as the property can be developed, which is why he asks that the attorney who drafted the settlement is allowed to speak prior to making a motion. Chair Johnson noted that if there is a subsequent motion, and the Board would like to make it, a call for the vote has not been made. Board Member Washington thanked the Chair for following protocol, noting that typically in a meeting like this, input is taken from the public first and then elected officials make their comments. The public has already had their opportunity to speak, this is not a town hall meeting. Going back to the cost of this, the City did not request a fee credit when this project was approved back in 2013/2014. The City approved this project with their eye on economic development that would benefit their city, but the rest of the County is paying the price for the potential development. The RCA shouldn’t undertake this for the sole benefit of the City of Moreno Valley while the rest of the County pays the price. Board Member Lock Dawson wanted clarification on whether the denial of the fee credit request today would in any way take away the ability to go back and purchase the lands later. Ward Simmons, general counsel, noted that this was correct and the issue of purchasing the lands could be brought back later. Board Member Hewitt noted that he had made a motion earlier and no one had asked for a second for it. The substitute motion offered by the Chair was made afterwards and got an immediate second. Chair Johnson appreciated the comment, but hearing a motion causes a pause and a question for further discussion. As there was no second motion, the meeting moved on. Board Member Sobek asked Chair Johnson to clarify her motion. Chair Johnson stated the motion is to deny the City of Moreno Valley fee credit request for the World Logistics Center,

17


as recommended by staff, and to bring back the fee credit policy to the Stakeholders Committee and staff. Board Member Ingram noted when appropriate, he would like to make a counter motion. Board Member Ingram made a motion to bring this item back for discussion and not denying the City’s request at this time. Board Member Washington noted that Board Member Ingram’s motion was not one of the three items brought forward by staff. The options are to direct staff to develop a new fee credit policy, to negotiate outside of current policy, or deny the City’s request. Board Member Ingram amended his motion to direct staff to amend the policy regarding the fee credit. Chair Johnson asked for general counsel’s clarification on the item. Mr. Simmons noted that the Board would need to act on the motion on the floor. Board Member Washington wanted clarification if the Board policy was to allow subsequent motions without acting on the original motion. Mr. Simmons asked the Chair if she would accept the amendment made by Board Member Ingram to her original motion. Chair Johnson noted that she was not in acceptance with the amendment. M/S/C (Johnson/Washington) to: Deny the fee credit request from the City of Moreno Valley for World Logistics Center and bring the fee credit policy to the Stakeholders Committee and staff for discussion. No: Hewitt, Cervantez, Ingram, Edwards

10. BOARD OF DIRECTORS / EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT

Anne Mayer, Executive Director, introduced Sergio Vidal the new Chief Financial Officer for

RCA/RCTC. Mr. Vidal comes from the City of Santa Ana serving multiple different roles.

12. ADJOURNMENT

There being no further business for consideration by the Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority Board of Directors, Chair Johnson adjourned the meeting at 2:43 p.m. The next meeting of the Board of Directors is scheduled to be held on Monday, March 7, 2022.

18


Respectfully submitted,

Lisa Mobley

Administrative Services Manager/ Clerk of the Board

19

AGENDA ITEM 6C

BLANK

Agenda Item 6C


DATE: March 7, 2022


FROM: Executive Committee Jennifer Fuller, Financial Administration Manager


SUBJECT: Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Fee Collection Report for December 2021

EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Board of Directors to receive and file the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) Fee Collection Report for December 2021.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The Western Riverside County MSHCP Local Development Mitigation Fee (LDMF) collections provide funding for the acquisition of additional reserve lands and related costs. RCA budgeted $20 million in LDMF collections for FY 2021/22. Other fees are contributed by Member Agencies and other jurisdictions for civic and infrastructure projects. RCA budgeted $559,000 for such contributions in FY 2021/22. Attached is the LDMF Collection and Civic/Infrastructure Contribution report for December 2021, which reflects combined collections to date of $6,535,059 for FY 2021/22. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact to the receipt and file of this fee collection report. Attachment: Western Riverside County MSHCP LDMF Collection and Civic/Infrastructure

Contribution Report for December 2021

Approved by the Executive Committee on February 16, 2022 In Favor: 5 Abstain: 0 No: 0

20

BLANK

City/County Month Residential

Permits ADUs/

Additions

Commercial Industrial

Acres Amount Remitted

Total FY 22 Year-to-Date

Residential Permits

Commercial Industrial

Acres Amount City of Banning November 1 2,935$ 16,208$ City of Beaumont October 18 52,830 675,776

November 10 29,350 City of Calimesa November-Pending - 4,825 City of Canyon Lake November 1 2,935 5,870 City of Corona November 24 76,098 111,210 City of Eastvale November-No Activity - - City of Hemet November 18 52,830 440,492 City of Jurupa Valley November-No Activity - 393,005 City of Lake Elsinore November 12 35,220 354,046 City of Menifee November 55 161,425 198,803 City of Moreno Valley November 26 76,310 498,423 City of Murrieta November 234 156,780 330,915 City of Norco September 2 5,705 51,640

October 2 5,109 November-No Activity -

City of Perris October 1 4,469 233,029 Prior Year 43 2.00 122,615

November-Pending - City of Riverside Prior Year 7 15,176 129,689

October-Pending - November-Pending -

City of San Jacinto November 1 2,935 123,871 City of Temecula October 9 13,257 27,264

Roripaugh DA1 - 51 263.48 3,306,702November-Pending -

City of Wildomar August-Pending - 5,870 September-Pending -

October-Pending - November-Pending -

County of Riverside December 46 3 124,447 2,346,667 November (719)

Total LDMF Collections 506 7 2.00 939,706$ 5,947,603$ 51 263.48 3,306,702$

Total FY 22 Year-to-Date

Temecula PW11-10 Flood Control Channel

$120 $120

587,337

Total Civic/Infrastructure Contributions $120 $587,457

TOTAL DECEMBER 2021 939,826$ 6,535,059$

1 Roripaugh Development Agreement dated 12/17/02. Project is exempt under Assessment District 161.

City of Temecula

Prior Civic and Infrastructure contributions from Member Agencies

CIVIC AND INFRASTRUCTURE CONTRIBUTIONS

WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY MSHCP LDMF COLLECTION AND CIVIC/INFRASTRUCTURE CONTRIBUTION REPORT DECEMBER 2021

Amounts subject to rounding

LOCAL DEVELOPMENT MITIGATION FEE COLLECTIONS

REMITTED EXEMPTIONS & FEE CREDITS

21

BLANK

AGENDA ITEM 6D

BLANK

Agenda Item 6D


DATE: March 7, 2022


FROM: Executive Committee Jennifer Fuller, Financial Administration Manager Matthew Wallace, Deputy Director of Financial Administration


SUBJECT: Quarterly Investment Report

EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Board of Directors to receive and file the Quarterly Investment Report for the quarter ended December 31, 2021. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Per RCA Resolution No. 2022-002, an investment portfolio report shall be provided to the Board quarterly. All of RCA’s investments are managed by the County of Riverside Treasurer through the Riverside County Pooled Investment Fund. The quarterly investment report for the second quarter of Fiscal Year 2021/22, as required by state law and Board policy, reflects the investment activities resulting from available operating cash and endowments. As of December 31, 2021, RCA’s cash and investments was comprised of the following:

CASH AND INVESTMENTS PORTFOLIO AMOUNTS Operating $ 78,174,817 Trust 8,187,568 Total $ 86,362,385

The quarterly investment report includes the following information: • Investment Portfolio Report; • County of Riverside Investment Report for the Month Ended October 31, 2021; • County of Riverside Investment Report for the Month Ended November 30, 2021; and • County of Riverside Investment Report for the Month Ended December 31, 2021. RCA’s investments were in full compliance with the Board’s investment policy adopted on January 10, 2022. Additionally, RCA has adequate cash flows for the next six months.

22

Agenda Item 6D

FISCAL IMPACT: This is an information item. There is no fiscal impact. Attachments: 1) Investment Portfolio Report 2) County of Riverside Investment Report for the Month Ended October 31, 2021 3) County of Riverside Investment Report for the Month Ended November 30, 2021 4) County of Riverside Investment Report for the Month Ended December 31, 2021


23

Western Riverside County Regional Conservation AuthorityInvestment Portfolio ReportPeriod Ended: December 31, 2021

FAIR VALUE

RATINGMOODYS / S&P

COUPON RATE

YIELD TO MATURITY

OPERATING FUNDS County Treasurer's Pooled Investment Fund: Operating Funds 78,174,817$ Aaa-bf/AAA-V1 N/A 0.31%

Subtotal Operating Funds 78,174,817

FUNDS HELD IN TRUST County Treasurer's Pooled Investment Fund: RCA Endowments 3,039,762 Aaa-bf/AAA-V1 N/A 0.31%

Permanent Endowments 5,147,806 Aaa-bf/AAA-V1 N/A 0.31%

Subtotal Funds Held in Trust 8,187,568

TOTAL All Cash and Investments 86,362,385$

$‐

$10,000,000

$20,000,000

$30,000,000

$40,000,000

$50,000,000

$60,000,000

$70,000,000

$80,000,000

$90,000,000

Operating Funds RCA Endowments Permanent Endowments

Nature of Investments

90.5%

3.5% 6.0%

ATTACHMENT 1

24

BLANK

County of RiversideTreasurer-Tax Collector's Pooled

Investment Fund

October 2021

ATTACHMENT 2

25

Contents

COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE TREASURER-TAX COLLECTOR 1

2| Treasurer-Tax Collector’s Pooled Investment Fund

3| Economy

4| Market Data

6| Portfolio Data

8| Compliance Report

9| Month End Holdings

26


The Treasurer’s Pooled Investment Fund is comprised of contributions from the county,

schools, special districts, and other discretionary depositors throughout the County of Riverside.

The primary objective of the Treasurer shall be to safeguard the principal of the funds under the

Treasurer's control, meet the liquidity needs of the depositor, and to maximize a return on the

funds within the given parameters.

The Treasurer-Tax Collector and the Capital Markets team are committed to maintaining

the highest credit ratings. The Treasurer’s Pooled Investment Fund is currently rated Aaa-bf by

Moody’s Investor Service and AAAf/S1 by Fitch Ratings, two of the nation’s most trusted bond

credit rating services.

Since its inception, the Treasurer’s Pooled Investment Fund has been in full compliance

with the Treasurer’s Statement of Investment Policy, which is more restrictive than California.

Treasurer’s Statement Capital Markets Team Matt Jennings

Treasurer-Tax Collector

Giovane Pizano Assistant Treasurer

John Byerly

Chief Investment Officer

Steve Faeth Senior Investment Officer

Isela Licea

Assistant Investment Officer

Treasurer-Tax Collector’s Pooled Investment Fund

6-Month Pool Performance

Economic data telegraphed mixed messag-es in October as positive news was found within disappointing economic headlines. The news cycle was dominated by images of large container ships anchored off the Port of Los Angeles waiting to offload products that re-main absent on store shelfs. While the FED did not meet in October, market moves sig-naled a possible monetary policy change. The change in the rate environment is a welcome sign for investors like the Treasurer Tax-Collector’s Pooled Investment Fund, who invest operating funds. The economy continues to expand, while information underscoring pent up demand and continued growth is interspersed with signs of weakness. Mixed information is a challenge to the FED as they attempt to strike the right balance of promoting both price stability and full employment. As measured by Gross Domestic Product, the economy fell from 6.7% growth to 2.0%, missing expectations for the third quarter. The Industrial Production index declined by -1.3% in September and its August figure was re-vised lower, reflecting the impact of bottle-necks and shortages.

Softer employment data was highlighted by the Nonfarm Payroll Report, up by only 194,000 jobs, as employers struggle to find the workers they need. It’s worth noting this re-port was not quite as weak as it first appeared. Data from the prior two months were revised higher and most of the weakness came from a 123,000 job loss in government payrolls, all of which were in state and local education. Both labor and non-labor supply shortages continue to contribute to inflationary pres-sures, and the Consumer Price Index release showed inflation picking back up at 5.4% year over year. Rising costs for basic items are driving the gain. Energy prices rose 1.3% and remain up 24.8% over the past year. Prices for food at home jumped 1.2% month over month. Elsewhere, the rising cost of housing over the past year is being reflected more forcefully in the inflation data. Retail gasoline prices are up 44% over the year ended October 25, 2021 in the greater Los Angeles Area, just one of many price increase data points. On a brighter note, sup-ply chain challenges are bolstering employ-ment in the transportation sector. Transporta-tion and warehousing added 47,300 jobs., with

warehousing and storage, and couriers and messengers leading the way. Local employ-ment data showed San Bernardino/Riverside Counties’ payrolls expanded by 6.6%, led by gains in the trade, transportation, and utilities industries. Fed Funds Futures Contracts indicate in-vestors’ expectation for hikes in the FED’s short-term rates has shifted. By the end of October, these contract rates suggest an esti-mated 52% chance of a rate hike by September 2022, up markedly from 26% just a month ago. Intermediate to longer term interest rates rose in October as the FED hinted at ending their open market bond buying program. The market interprets this to mean a rise in Fed Funds will eventually follow. The 2-year Treasury note yield began the month at 0.27% and ended at 0.50%. The 5-year Treasury note yield began the month at 0.93% and ended at 1.19%. Stock prices ended the month up, as the Dow Jones Industrial Average gained 4.3% to 35,819.

Matt Jennings Treasurer-Tax Collector

Monthly Commentary Rates Begin Liftoff?

Month End Market Value ($)*

Month End Book Value ($)

Paper Gain or Loss ($)

Paper Gain or Loss (%) Book Yield (%) WAM (Yrs)

Oct-21 9,422,575,640.92 9,437,887,551.30 (15,311,910.38) -0.162% 0.30 1.27

Sep-21 8,738,462,044.75 8,729,419,196.20 9,042,848.55 0.104% 0.30 1.24

Aug-21 9,005,666,395.48 8,998,636,800.02 7,029,595.46 0.078% 0.29 1.21

Jul-21 8,738,462,044.75 8,729,419,196.20 9,042,848.55 0.104% 0.30 1.24

Jun-21 9,505,561,665.45 9,503,657,508.92 1,904,156.53 0.020% 0.27 1.15

May-21 9,566,648,736.34 9,558,825,055.66 7,823,680.68 0.082% 0.28 1.13 *Market values do not include accrued interest.

27


Economy

Private Sector Average Hourly Earnings Y/Y

Nonfarm Payrolls Total M/M Change SA

Durable Goods Percent Chg. Y/Y

New Home Sales SAAR

Key Economic Indicators Release Date Indicator Actual Consensus Prior Year 10/28/2021 Real GDP - Q/Q Change 2.0% 2.6% 33.1% 10/08/2021 Unemployment Rate - Seasonally Adjusted 4.8% 5.1% 7.9% 10/08/2021 Non-Farm Payrolls - M/M Change - Thousands 194 500 661 10/13/2021 CPI - Y/Y Change 5.4% 5.3% 1.4% 10/13/2021 CPI Ex Food and Energy - Y/Y Change 4.0% 4.0% 1.7% 10/05/2021 ISM Non-Manufacturing Index (> 50 indicates growth) 61.9 59.9 57.8 10/26/2021 New Home Sales - SAAR - Thousands 800 756 959 10/04/2021 Factory Orders - M/M Change 1.2% 1.0% 0.7% 10/04/2021 Durable Goods Orders - New Orders - M/M Change 1.8% 1.8% 0.5% *Note: 'Prior Year' displays final estimates of indicator values from the equivalent period of the prior year.

28


U.S. Treasury Curve

The US Treasury Curve and its values are subject to frequent change and will be updated monthly with each issued TPIF

report.

Market Data Federal Open Market Committee Meeting The FOMC stated that with progress on vaccinations and strong policy support, indicators of economic activity and

employment have continued to strengthen, but risks to the economic outlook remain.

The FOMC maintained the Fed Funds Target Range of 0.0-0.25%

The FOMC stated in their September statement, that they will continue their asset purchase program until substantial

further progress has been met. However, If progress continues broadly as expected, the Committee judges that a

moderation in the pace of asset purchases may soon be warranted.

The FOMC is committed to using its full range of tools to support the U.S. economy in this challenging time, thereby

promoting its maximum employment and price stability goals .

Fed Funds Target Rate (Upper Limit)

29

* Values listed for commodities and stocks are in US dollars and are as of the final business day of each month.


U.S. Treasuries

Market Data cont’d

Stocks

Commodities

30

The County of Riverside’s Treasurer’s Pooled Investment Fund is currently rated AAA-bf by Moody’s Investor Service and

AAAf/S1 by Fitch Ratings.

Moody’s Asset Rating (000’s)

S&P Asset Rating (000’s)


Portfolio Data

Based on historic and current financial conditions within the County, the Pool is expected to maintain sufficient liquidity of

* Values listed in Cash Flow Table are in millions of USD.

12-Month Projected Cash Flow

Month Monthly Re-

ceipts Monthly Dis-bursements Difference

Required Matured In-vestments Balance

Actual In-vestments Maturing

Available to Invest > 1

Year 11/2021 79.86 11/2021 1,371.49 1,197.65 173.84 253.70 1,880.58 12/2021 2,634.19 1,400.00 1234.19 1,487.89 437.25 01/2022 1,150.00 2,000.00 -850.00 637.89 1,131.62 02/2022 1,100.00 1,500.00 -400.00 237.89 580.00 03/2022 1,300.00 1,551.62 -251.62 13.73 - 520.00 04/2022 2,476.30 1,542.08 934.22 934.22 145.40 05/2022 1,700.00 2,200.00 -500.00 434.22 505.00 06/2022 2,000.00 2,400.00 -400.00 34.22 202.23 07/2022 1,500.00 1,800.00 -300.00 265.78 - 208.77 08/2022 1,398.14 1,552.97 -154.83 154.83 - 14.23 09/2022 2,050.00 1,804.41 245.59 245.59 29.94 10/2022 1,500.00 1,700.00 -200.00 45.59 217.31 TOTALS 20,180.12 20,648.73 (468.61) 434.34 4,391.07 5,872.31 9,003.54 4.60% 62.22% 95.40%

31

Asset Maturity Distribution (Par Value, 000’s)

Portfolio Data cont’d

TIMMI

The Treasurer’s Institutional Money Market Index (TIMMI) is a composite index of four AAA rated prime institutional money market funds.

Their average yield is compared to the yield of the Treasurer’s Pooled Investment Fund in the above graph.

Asset Allocation (000’s)


Assets (000's) Scheduled Par Scheduled Book Scheduled Market Mkt/Book WAL(Yr) Mat(Yr)

REPOS 100,000.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 100.00% 0.033 0.033 MMKT 500,865.06 501,050.00 501,050.00 100.00% 0.003 0.003 CALTRUST FND 93,213.17 94,017.20 94,017.20 100.00% 0.003 0.003 DDA/PASSBK 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 100.00% 0.003 0.003 US TREAS BILLS 1,300,000.00 1,299,482.03 1,299,680.19 100.02% 0.307 0.307 US TREAS BONDS 1,235,000.00 1,234,000.31 1,228,963.12 99.59% 2.355 2.355 FHLMC BONDS 455,710.00 455,609.17 451,907.80 99.19% 1.500 2.857 FNMA BONDS 564,751.00 565,338.78 562,906.36 99.57% 1.794 2.806 FHLB BONDS 881,896.25 881,585.59 876,679.52 99.44% 2.337 3.646 FFCB DISC NOTES 92,000.00 91,962.39 91,978.46 100.02% 0.347 0.347 FFCB BONDS 703,203.00 703,124.67 703,371.14 100.04% 1.107 1.725 FARMER MAC 10,000.00 9,947.90 10,406.00 104.60% 1.663 1.663 MUNI BONDS 261,980.00 262,944.21 262,944.21 100.00% 1.414 1.414 COMM PAPER 1,270,000.00 1,269,495.13 1,269,698.97 100.02% 0.237 0.237 NCDS 1,394,400.00 1,394,411.49 1,394,411.49 100.00% 0.334 0.334 IFC BONDS 75,000.00 74,918.68 74,561.18 99.52% 2.90 2.90

Totals (000's): 9,438,018.48 9,437,887.55 9,422,575.64 99.84% 0.98 1.27

32

Compliance Status: Full Compliance The Treasurer’s Pooled Investment Fund was in full compliance with the County of Riverside’s Treasurer’s State-

ment of Investment Policy. The County’s Statement of Investment Policy is more restrictive than California Gov-

ernment Code 53646. The County’s Investment Policy is reviewed annually by the County of Riverside’s Over-

sight Committee and approved by the Board of Supervisors.

1 Money Market Mutual Funds maturity may be interpreted as a weighted average maturity not exceeding 60 days. 2 Or must have an investment advisor with no fewer than 5 years experience and with assets under management of $500,000,000 USD.

THIS COMPLETES THE REPORT REQUIREMENTS OF CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE 53646. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE TREASURER-TAX COLLECTOR 8

Compliance Report

GOVERNMENT CODE COUNTY INVESTMENT POLICY

Investment Category Maximum Remaining

Maturity

Authorized % Limit

S&P/ Moody's

Maximum Remaining

Maturity

Authorized % Limit

S&P/Moody's/Fitch Actual %

MUNICIPAL BONDS (MUNI) 5 YEARS NO LIMIT NA 4 YEARS 15% AA-/Aa3/AA- 2.79%

U.S. TREASURIES 5 YEARS NO LIMIT NA 5 YEARS 100% NA 26.84%

LOCAL AGENCY OBLIGATIONS (LAO) 5 YEARS NO LIMIT NA 3 YEARS 2.50% INVESTMENT

GRADE 0.00%

FEDERAL AGENCIES 5 YEARS NO LIMIT AAA 5 YEARS 100% NA 28.69%

COMMERCIAL PAPER (CP) 270 DAYS 40% A1/P1 270 DAYS 40% A1/P1/F1 13.45%

CERTIFICATE & TIME DE-POSITS (NCD & TCD) 5 YEARS 30% NA 1 YEAR 25%

Combined A1/P1/F1 14.77%

INT'L BANK FOR RECON-STRUCTION AND DEVELOP-MENT AND INT'L FINANCE CORPORATION

NA NA NA 4 YEARS 20% AA/Aa/AA 0.79%

REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS (REPO) 1 YEARS NO LIMIT NA 45 DAYS

40% max, 25% in term repo over 7 days

A1/P1/F1 0.0%

REVERSE REPOS 92 DAYS 20% NA 60 DAYS 10% NA 0.00%

MEDIUM TERM NOTES (MTNO) 5 YEARS 30% A 3 YEARS 20% AA/Aa2/AA 0.00%

CALTRUST SHORT TERM FUND NA NA NA DAILY

LIQUIDITY 1.00% NA 1.00%

MONEY MARKET MUTUAL FUNDS (MMF) 60 DAYS(1) 20% AAA/Aaa (2) DAILY

LIQUIDITY 20% AAA by 2 Of 3 RATINGS 5.31%

LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND (LAIF) NA NA NA DAILY

LIQUIDITY Max

$50 million NA 0.00%

CASH/DEPOSIT AC-COUNT NA NA NA NA NA NA 5.30%

33

Description MaturityDate

Coupon ParValue

BookValue

MarketPrice

MarketValue

UnrealizedGain/Loss

BMO BNY TRI-PARTY REPO 11/12/2021 .040 100,000,000.00 100,000,000.00 100.000000 100,000,000.00 0.00.040 100,000,000.00 100,000,000.00 100.000000 100,000,000.00 0.00

FIDELITY GOV 11/01/2021 .010 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 100.000000 1,000,000.00 0.00FEDERATED GOV 11/01/2021 .025 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 100.000000 1,000,000.00 0.00WELLS FARGO GOV 11/01/2021 .025 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 100.000000 1,000,000.00 0.00BLACKROCK GOV 11/01/2021 .025 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 100.000000 1,000,000.00 0.00JP MORGAN GOV 11/01/2021 .026 96,000,000.00 96,000,000.00 100.000000 96,000,000.00 0.00GOLDMAN SACHS GOV 11/01/2021 .026 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 100.000000 1,000,000.00 0.00JP MORGAN PRIME 11/01/2021 .066 349,875,062.47 350,050,000.00 100.050000 350,050,000.00 0.00MORGAN STANLEY PRIME 11/01/2021 .060 49,990,002.00 50,000,000.00 100.020000 50,000,000.00 0.00

.057 500,865,064.47 501,050,000.00 100.036923 501,050,000.00 0.00

CALTRUST SHT TERM FUND 11/01/2021 .126 93,213,169.12 94,017,200.84 100.862573 94,017,200.84 0.00.126 93,213,169.12 94,017,200.84 100.862573 94,017,200.84 0.00

BANK OF THE WEST 11/01/2021 .050 500,000,000.00 500,000,000.00 100.000000 500,000,000.00 0.00.050 500,000,000.00 500,000,000.00 100.000000 500,000,000.00 0.00

PACIFIC PREMIER BANK 11/01/2021 1.530 0.00 0.00 .000000 0.00 0.00FIRST REPUBLIC BANK 11/01/2021 1.515 0.00 0.00 .000000 0.00 0.00UB MANAGED RATE 11/01/2021 .069 0.00 0.00 .000000 0.00 0.00

.000 0.00 0.00 .000000 0.00 0.00

U.S. TREASURY BILL 11/04/2021 .086 50,000,000.00 49,965,480.56 100.000000 50,000,000.00 34,519.44U.S. TREASURY BILL 01/27/2022 .052 85,000,000.00 84,962,002.64 99.986000 84,988,100.00 26,097.36U.S. TREASURY BILL 01/27/2022 .045 50,000,000.00 49,980,812.50 99.986000 49,993,000.00 12,187.50U.S. TREASURY BILL 02/24/2022 .052 50,000,000.00 49,975,930.00 99.982000 49,991,000.00 15,070.00U.S. TREASURY BILL 01/27/2022 .047 50,000,000.00 49,980,155.56 99.986000 49,993,000.00 12,844.44U.S. TREASURY BILL 01/27/2022 .045 50,000,000.00 49,981,437.50 99.986000 49,993,000.00 11,562.50U.S. TREASURY BILL 02/24/2022 .055 50,000,000.00 49,975,128.47 99.982000 49,991,000.00 15,871.53U.S. TREASURY BILL 03/24/2022 .057 50,000,000.00 49,972,377.78 99.977000 49,988,500.00 16,122.22U.S. TREASURY BILL 03/24/2022 .032 50,000,000.00 49,986,218.75 99.977000 49,988,500.00 2,281.25U.S. TREASURY BILL 01/27/2022 .043 50,000,000.00 49,986,777.78 99.986000 49,993,000.00 6,222.22U.S. TREASURY BILL 06/16/2022 .070 50,000,000.00 49,964,661.67 99.946000 49,973,000.00 8,338.33U.S. TREASURY BILL 02/24/2022 .050 75,000,000.00 74,974,375.00 99.982000 74,986,500.00 12,125.00U.S. TREASURY BILL 01/27/2022 .039 50,000,000.00 49,988,541.53 99.986000 49,993,000.00 4,458.47U.S. TREASURY BILL 12/16/2021 .081 100,000,000.00 99,984,436.67 99.991000 99,991,000.00 6,563.33U.S. TREASURY BILL 12/14/2021 .081 50,000,000.00 49,992,509.03 99.992000 49,996,000.00 3,490.97U.S. TREASURY BILL 12/07/2021 .070 120,000,000.00 119,986,000.00 99.994000 119,992,800.00 6,800.00U.S. TREASURY BILL 10/06/2022 .118 25,000,000.00 24,971,767.36 99.889354 24,972,338.54 571.18U.S. TREASURY BILL 01/11/2022 .053 35,000,000.00 34,996,120.83 99.989646 34,996,376.04 255.21U.S. TREASURY BILL 02/22/2022 .050 50,000,000.00 49,991,875.00 99.984306 49,992,152.78 277.78U.S. TREASURY BILL 10/06/2022 .116 110,000,000.00 109,878,425.56 99.890767 109,879,843.34 1,417.78U.S. TREASURY BILL 12/15/2021 .100 50,000,000.00 49,993,666.67 99.988389 49,994,194.45 527.78U.S. TREASURY BILL 12/15/2021 .100 50,000,000.00 49,993,333.33 99.987778 49,993,888.89 555.56

.067 1,300,000,000.00 1,299,482,034.19 99.975400 1,299,680,194.04 198,159.85

U.S. TREASURY BOND 11/30/2024 1.500 25,000,000.00 24,705,078.13 102.145000 25,536,250.00 831,171.87U.S. TREASURY BOND 01/31/2026 .375 10,000,000.00 9,897,265.63 97.004000 9,700,400.00 -196,865.63U.S. TREASURY BOND 01/31/2026 .375 10,000,000.00 9,894,140.63 97.004000 9,700,400.00 -193,740.63U.S. TREASURY BOND 02/15/2024 .125 25,000,000.00 24,930,664.06 98.949000 24,737,250.00 -193,414.06U.S. TREASURY BOND 04/30/2025 .375 15,000,000.00 14,956,640.63 98.125000 14,718,750.00 -237,890.63U.S. TREASURY BOND 02/15/2026 1.625 10,000,000.00 10,401,560.00 102.246000 10,224,600.00 -176,960.00U.S. TREASURY BOND 02/15/2026 1.625 10,000,000.00 10,466,015.63 102.246000 10,224,600.00 -241,415.63U.S. TREASURY BOND 07/31/2025 .250 25,000,000.00 24,537,109.38 97.324000 24,331,000.00 -206,109.38U.S. TREASURY BOND 02/28/2026 .500 20,000,000.00 19,910,508.60 97.449000 19,489,800.00 -420,708.60U.S. TREASURY BOND 02/28/2025 1.125 10,000,000.00 10,231,250.00 100.840000 10,084,000.00 -147,250.00U.S. TREASURY BOND 03/15/2024 .250 50,000,000.00 49,945,312.50 99.113000 49,556,500.00 -388,812.50U.S. TREASURY BOND 03/31/2025 .500 25,000,000.00 24,855,468.75 98.707000 24,676,750.00 -178,718.75U.S. TREASURY BOND 03/31/2023 .125 50,000,000.00 49,966,796.88 99.719000 49,859,500.00 -107,296.88U.S. TREASURY BOND 03/31/2025 .500 25,000,000.00 24,882,812.50 98.707000 24,676,750.00 -206,062.50U.S. TREASURY BOND 03/31/2023 .125 50,000,000.00 49,978,515.63 99.719000 49,859,500.00 -119,015.63U.S. TREASURY BOND 05/31/2022 .125 50,000,000.00 50,035,156.25 100.016000 50,008,000.00 -27,156.25U.S. TREASURY BOND 05/31/2022 .125 50,000,000.00 50,029,296.88 100.016000 50,008,000.00 -21,296.88U.S. TREASURY BOND 05/31/2022 .125 75,000,000.00 75,043,945.31 100.016000 75,012,000.00 -31,945.31U.S. TREASURY BOND 06/30/2026 .875 20,000,000.00 19,993,166.80 98.715000 19,743,000.00 -250,166.80U.S. TREASURY BOND 06/30/2026 .875 35,000,000.00 34,946,679.69 98.715000 34,550,250.00 -396,429.69U.S. TREASURY BOND 06/30/2022 .125 30,000,000.00 30,014,062.50 100.016000 30,004,800.00 -9,262.50U.S. TREASURY BOND 12/31/2025 .375 25,000,000.00 24,652,343.75 97.137000 24,284,250.00 -368,093.75U.S. TREASURY BOND 08/31/2026 .750 25,000,000.00 24,900,416.25 98.016000 24,504,000.00 -396,416.25U.S. TREASURY BOND 09/15/2024 .375 25,000,000.00 24,952,148.44 99.808594 24,952,148.44 0.00U.S. TREASURY BOND 03/31/2026 .750 25,000,000.00 25,039,062.50 98.395000 24,598,750.00 -440,312.50U.S. TREASURY BOND 09/15/2024 .375 25,000,000.00 24,953,125.00 99.812500 24,953,125.00 0.00U.S. TREASURY BOND 08/31/2026 .750 25,000,000.00 24,817,382.81 98.016000 24,504,000.00 -313,382.81U.S.. TREASURY BOND 09/30/2026 .875 20,000,000.00 19,895,833.60 99.479168 19,895,833.60 0.00U.S. TREASURY BOND 09/30/2025 .250 25,000,000.00 24,445,312.50 97.074000 24,268,500.00 -176,812.50U.S. TREASURY BOND 10/31/2023 1.625 20,000,000.00 20,536,718.75 102.207000 20,441,400.00 -95,318.75U.S. TREASURY BOND 07/31/2023 1.250 50,000,000.00 50,818,359.38 101.422000 50,711,000.00 -107,359.38U.S. TREASURY BOND 05/15/2023 .125 50,000,000.00 49,867,187.50 99.609000 49,804,500.00 -62,687.50U.S. TREASURY BOND 09/30/2025 .250 25,000,000.00 24,323,242.19 97.074000 24,268,500.00 -54,742.19U.S. TREASURY BOND 04/15/2023 .250 25,000,000.00 24,994,140.63 99.875000 24,968,750.00 -25,390.63U.S. TREASURY BOND 02/28/2023 2.625 25,000,000.00 25,803,710.94 103.086000 25,771,500.00 -32,210.94U.S. TREASURY BOND 04/30/2023 .125 25,000,000.00 24,930,664.06 99.652000 24,913,000.00 -17,664.06U.S. TREASURY BOND 05/31/2023 .125 25,000,000.00 24,917,968.75 99.602000 24,900,500.00 -17,468.75U.S. TREASURY BOND 03/31/2023 .125 25,000,000.00 24,941,406.25 99.719000 24,929,750.00 -11,656.25U.S. TREASURY BOND 10/15/2024 .625 25,000,000.00 24,905,273.44 99.621094 24,905,273.44 0.00U.S. TREASURY BOND 07/31/2023 .125 25,000,000.00 24,885,742.19 99.542969 24,885,742.19 0.00U.S. TREASURY BILL 01/31/2023 .125 50,000,000.00 49,916,015.63 99.828000 49,914,000.00 -2,015.63U.S. TREASURY BOND 02/28/2023 .125 50,000,000.00 49,882,812.50 99.773000 49,886,500.00 3,687.50

.458 1,235,000,000.00 1,234,000,313.44 99.511184 1,228,963,122.67 -5,037,190.77

FHLMC 5YrNc9MoB 08/19/2025 .625 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.592000 9,859,200.00 -140,800.00.625 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.592000 9,859,200.00 -140,800.00

1310: U.S. TREASURY BOND

912828ZX191282CBC4

91282CCX791282CBT7

1170: MGD RATE-A/360

CASHCASH

1300: U.S. TREASURY BILL

912796M89

1060: MMKT ACCTS-A/365-6

CJPXXMVRXX

CLTR

91282CDB4

1420: FHLMC-Fxd-Q 30/360

1425: FHLMC-Fxd-S 30/360

1080: MGD RATE-A/365-6

912828ZL7

91282CBH3

CASH

91282CCN9

91282CBU4

TFDXX

9128284A591282CBX8

912796R92

912828ZR4

91282CBU4

912828ZH6

912828ZR4912828ZR4

91282CAM3

912828YV6

91282CBM2

91282CBR1

912828P46912828P46

91282CCJ8

912796D30

912796P52

912828ZF0

912796Q69

912796P60

91282CBQ391282CAB7

912796ZX0912796ZX0

91282CCJ8

.625 3.748 3.803

.625 3.748 3.803

.301 1.330 1.329

.432 2.316 2.345

.384 1.745 1.748

.259 1.247 1.252

.288 1.414 1.414

.754 2.921 2.959

.307 1.497 1.496

.330 1.579 1.581

.266 1.452 1.455

.254 1.313 1.329

.293 1.535 1.537

.950 3.880 3.918

4.918

.319 1.973 2.000

.334 1.729 1.748

4.335 4.416

.902 4.728 4.836

.815 3.883 3.918

.982 4.796

.438 2.852 2.877

.700 4.118 4.170

.439 2.852 2.877

.715

.832 4.730 4.836

.906 4.549 4.666

.077 .666 .663

.065 .583 .581

.882 4.550 4.666

.054 .583 .581

.066 .583 .581

.619 3.380 3.416

.147 1.415 1.414

.647 3.380 3.416

.159 1.415 1.414

.539 3.267 3.332

.287 2.363 2.373

.675 3.720 3.751

.591 4.276 4.332

.799 4.133 4.296

.219 2.283

.670 4.136 4.296

.593 4.204 4.2552.293

.445 3.473 3.499

1.751 2.980 3.085.586 4.204 4.255

.067 .306 .307

.095 .123 .123

.100 .123 .123

.050 .312 .312

.116 .930 .932

.118 .930 .932

.053 .197 .197

.081 .120 .121

.070 .101 .101

.039 .241 .241

.081 .126 .126

.070 .624 .625

.050 .317 .318

.032 .394 .395

.043 .241 .241

.317 .318.057 .394 .395

912796D30912796F38

.055

.317 .318.047 .241 .241.045 .241 .241

.052

.011 .011.052 .241 .241.045 .241 .241

.086

.000 .003.000 .000 .000.069

1.530 .000 .0031.515 .000 .003

.050 .003 .003

.050

.081

.003 .003

.081 .003 .003.003 .003

.003

.063 .003 .003

.059 .003 .003

.003.003 .003.026.003 .003.026

.003.025 .003 .003.010

.003 .003.025

.033.040 .033

.033

Fund: 1 POOL FUND

1000: REPOS-A/360REPO .040 .033

912828ZC7

.003

.025 .003

.055 .003

YieldTo Mat

ModifiedDuration

Years ToMaturity

Month End Portfolio Holdings

CUSIP

912828ZP8

912796J67

912796M89

912796C31

912828S92

912796C31

9127964W6

GOFXX

1065: CLTR-A/365-6

912796J42

912796C31

FRGXX

912796C31

WFFXX

91282CBN0

3134GWLW4

912828ZF091282CBU4

91282CCW9

OGVXXFGTXX

CASH

91282CBH3

912796F38912796C31

912796C31912796D30

91282CCX791282CCW9

91282CAM391282CCZ2

912828T91

91282CCD1

91282CBG5


34


Coupon ParValue

BookValue

MarketPrice

MarketValue

UnrealizedGain/Loss

YieldTo Mat

ModifiedDuration

Years ToMaturity


CUSIP

FHLMC 5YrNc1YrQ 05/27/2025 .750 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.471000 9,947,100.00 -52,900.00FHLMC 5YrNc1YrQ 05/28/2025 .730 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.405000 9,940,500.00 -59,500.00FHLMC 5YrNc1YrQ 05/28/2025 .730 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 99.405000 4,970,250.00 -29,750.00FHLMC 4YrNc2YrO 06/03/2024 .500 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.614000 9,961,400.00 -38,600.00FHLMC 4.9YrNc11MoB 05/28/2025 .750 15,000,000.00 14,992,500.00 99.405000 14,910,750.00 -81,750.00FHLMC 5YrNc2YrB 06/09/2025 .650 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 98.893000 14,833,950.00 -166,050.00FHLMC 4YrNc2YrO 07/01/2024 .500 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 99.434000 4,971,700.00 -28,300.00FHLMC 4YrNc1YrQ 07/15/2024 .570 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 100.098000 5,004,900.00 4,900.00FHLMC 3.5YrNc1.5YrB 01/24/2024 .420 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 99.857000 14,978,550.00 -21,450.00FHLMC 3.75YrNC9MB 04/29/2024 .500 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 99.753000 14,962,950.00 -37,050.00FHLMC 4.5YrNc2YrB 01/29/2025 .510 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 99.338000 14,900,700.00 -99,300.00FHLMC 4YrNc1.5YrQ 09/10/2024 .400 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.938000 9,893,800.00 -106,200.00FHLMC 4YrNc6MoQ 09/10/2024 .450 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.244000 9,924,400.00 -75,600.00FHLMC 4YrNc1.5YrQ 09/10/2024 .400 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.938000 9,893,800.00 -106,200.00FHLMC 4YrNc6MoQ 09/11/2024 .450 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.241000 9,924,100.00 -75,900.00FHLMC 5YrNc2YrQ 09/15/2025 .540 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.045000 9,804,500.00 -195,500.00FHLMC 5YrNc2YrQ 09/15/2025 .540 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 98.045000 14,706,750.00 -293,250.00FHLMC 4.75YrNc2YrQ 06/16/2025 .500 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 98.280000 4,914,000.00 -86,000.00FHLMC 4.5YrNc1YrQ 03/24/2025 .475 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 98.489000 14,773,350.00 -226,650.00FHLMC 3.75YrNc1YrQ 06/24/2024 .410 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.359000 9,935,900.00 -64,100.00FHLMC 5YrNC1.5YrB 03/28/2025 .500 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.570000 9,857,000.00 -143,000.00FHLMC 5YrNC6mOB 09/30/2025 .600 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 98.201000 4,910,050.00 -89,950.00FHLMC 5YrNC3MoB 10/27/2025 .625 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.162000 9,816,200.00 -183,800.00FHLMC 5YrNc1YrQ 10/28/2025 .600 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.077000 9,807,700.00 -192,300.00FHLMC 5YrNc2YrQ 10/28/2025 .550 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 97.914000 9,791,400.00 -208,600.00FHLMC 5Yr 09/23/2025 .375 10,000,000.00 9,941,100.00 97.561000 9,756,100.00 -185,000.00FHLMC 3Yr 11/06/2023 .250 10,000,000.00 9,991,000.00 99.464000 9,946,400.00 -44,600.00FHLMC 5YrNc1YrQ 11/12/2025 .600 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 98.355000 4,917,750.00 -82,250.00FHLMC 5YrNc1YrQ 11/12/2025 .600 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 98.355000 4,917,750.00 -82,250.00FHLMC 3YrNC2YrA 11/16/2023 .300 15,000,000.00 14,988,750.00 99.448000 14,917,200.00 -71,550.00FHLMC 5YrNC2YrA 11/17/2025 .560 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 98.532000 4,926,600.00 -73,400.00FHLMC 5YrNC2YrA 11/17/2025 .560 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 98.532000 4,926,600.00 -73,400.00FHLMC 2YrNc1YrQ 11/23/2022 .190 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.978000 9,997,800.00 -2,200.00FHLMC 3YrNc1YrQ 11/24/2023 .320 10,000,000.00 9,997,500.00 99.746000 9,974,600.00 -22,900.00FHLMC 2YrNc1YrQ 11/23/2022 .200 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.980000 9,998,000.00 -2,000.00FHLMC 2YrNc1YrQ 11/23/2022 .200 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.980000 9,998,000.00 -2,000.00FHLMC 3.5YrNc11MoQ 05/24/2024 .400 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.609000 9,960,900.00 -39,100.00FHLMC 3.5YrNc11MoQ 05/24/2024 .400 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.609000 9,960,900.00 -39,100.00FHLMC 2.5YrNC1YrB 06/01/2023 .250 10,000,000.00 9,997,500.00 99.902000 9,990,200.00 -7,300.00FHLMC 3YrNC11MoB 11/24/2023 .320 10,710,000.00 10,707,322.50 99.746000 10,682,796.60 -24,525.90FHLMC 2.5YrNC1YrB 06/01/2023 .250 10,000,000.00 9,995,000.00 99.902000 9,990,200.00 -4,800.00FHLMC 2.5YrNC1YrB 06/01/2023 .250 10,000,000.00 9,998,500.00 99.902000 9,990,200.00 -8,300.00FHLMC 2YrNc1YrQ 12/15/2022 .200 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.966000 9,996,600.00 -3,400.00FHLMC 5YrNC3MoB 12/30/2025 .700 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.768000 9,876,800.00 -123,200.00FHLMC 2.5YrNC1YrB 06/30/2023 .220 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.875000 9,987,500.00 -12,500.00

.455 445,710,000.00 445,609,172.50 99.178523 442,048,596.60 -3,560,575.90

FNMA 4.83Yr 10/05/2022 2.000 15,000,000.00 14,782,200.00 101.735000 15,260,250.00 478,050.00FNMA 5Yr 01/19/2023 2.375 10,000,000.00 9,944,100.00 102.597000 10,259,700.00 315,600.00FNMA 4.41Yr 09/12/2023 2.875 30,000,000.00 30,670,500.00 104.381000 31,314,300.00 643,800.00FNMA 4.83Yr 01/07/2025 1.625 10,000,000.00 10,247,300.00 102.493000 10,249,300.00 2,000.00FNMA 5YrNc2YrQ 06/30/2025 .650 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 99.166000 4,958,300.00 -41,700.00FNMA 5YrNc1YrQ 06/30/2025 .740 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 99.363000 4,968,150.00 -31,850.00FNMA 5YrNc1YrQ 07/07/2025 .740 14,900,000.00 14,900,000.00 99.337000 14,801,213.00 -98,787.00FNMA 5YrNc1YrQ 07/15/2025 .730 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 99.301000 14,895,150.00 -104,850.00FNMA 5YrNc1YrB 07/29/2025 .700 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 99.062000 14,859,300.00 -140,700.00FNMA 5YrNc2YrB 07/29/2025 .600 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.121000 9,912,100.00 -87,900.00FNMA 5YrNc2YrB 07/29/2025 .600 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.619000 9,861,900.00 -138,100.00FNMA 5YrNc1YrB 08/04/2025 .700 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.175000 9,917,500.00 -82,500.00FNMA 5YrNc1YrB 08/04/2025 .700 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 99.175000 14,876,250.00 -123,750.00FNMA 4YrNc2YrB 08/12/2024 .410 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 99.432000 14,914,800.00 -85,200.00FNMA 3YrNC1.5YrB 08/17/2023 .310 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 99.837000 14,975,550.00 -24,450.00FNMA 5YrNc2Yr 08/19/2025 .550 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 98.519000 14,777,850.00 -222,150.00FNMA 5YrNc1YrQ 08/27/2025 .650 8,650,000.00 8,650,000.00 98.985000 8,562,202.50 -87,797.50FNMA 5YrNc1YrQ 08/27/2025 .625 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 98.919000 4,945,950.00 -54,050.00FNMA 3.5YrNc1.5YrQ 02/28/2024 .375 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.671000 9,967,100.00 -32,900.00FNMA 4.9YrNc11MoQ 08/26/2025 .600 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.854000 9,885,400.00 -114,600.00FNMA 3.9YrNc1.9YrQ 08/19/2024 .450 3,701,000.00 3,701,000.00 99.505000 3,682,680.05 -18,319.95FNMA 4YrNc2Yr 09/16/2024 .400 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.358000 9,935,800.00 -64,200.00FNMA 3.5YrNC2YrA 03/28/2024 .320 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.588000 9,958,800.00 -41,200.00FNMA 5YrNC1YrB 10/20/2025 .580 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.194000 9,819,400.00 -180,600.00FNMA 5YrNC2YrA 10/27/2025 .540 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.536000 9,853,600.00 -146,400.00FNMA 5YrNc2YrA 10/28/2025 .560 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 98.192000 4,909,600.00 -90,400.00FNMA 5YrNc1YrQ 10/29/2025 .600 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 98.654000 4,932,700.00 -67,300.00FNMA 5YrNc1YrQ 10/29/2025 .600 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.654000 9,865,400.00 -134,600.00FNMA 5YrNc1YrQ 10/29/2025 .600 10,000,000.00 9,998,000.00 98.654000 9,865,400.00 -132,600.00FNMA 5YrNc2YrA 11/04/2025 .550 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.544000 9,854,400.00 -145,600.00FNMA 4.9YrNc11MoQ 10/20/2025 .580 10,000,000.00 9,996,500.00 98.194000 9,819,400.00 -177,100.00FNMA 3.5YrNc2YrQ 05/03/2024 .350 3,500,000.00 3,499,300.00 99.559000 3,484,565.00 -14,735.00FNMA 5Yr 11/07/2025 .500 14,000,000.00 13,949,880.00 97.985000 13,717,900.00 -231,980.00FNMA 3YrNC2YrB 11/16/2023 .300 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.809000 9,980,900.00 -19,100.00FNMA 3.5YrNc2YrQ 05/17/2024 .350 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.531000 9,953,100.00 -46,900.00FNMA 3.5YrNc2YrQ 05/17/2024 .350 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.531000 9,953,100.00 -46,900.00FNMA 5YrNc2YrA 11/17/2025 .560 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.532000 9,853,200.00 -146,800.00FNMA 4YrNC2YrB 11/18/2024 .420 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.096000 9,909,600.00 -90,400.00FNMA 5YrNC2YrA 11/18/2025 .650 20,000,000.00 20,000,000.00 98.822000 19,764,400.00 -235,600.00FNMA 3.25YrNc2YrA 02/23/2024 .350 20,000,000.00 20,000,000.00 99.726000 19,945,200.00 -54,800.00FNMA 3.75YrNc2YrA 08/23/2024 .420 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 99.475000 14,921,250.00 -78,750.00FNMA 5YrNc2YrA 11/25/2025 .600 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 98.643000 14,796,450.00 -203,550.00FNMA 2.9YrNc2YrQ 11/16/2023 .310 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 99.826000 4,991,300.00 -8,700.00FNMA 4.5YrNc1.5YrB 06/24/2025 .500 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.777000 9,877,700.00 -122,300.00

.780 489,751,000.00 490,338,780.00 99.603290 487,808,110.55 -2,530,669.45

FNMA 2Yr 03/16/2022 .270 25,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 100.077000 25,019,250.00 19,250.00FNMA 2Yr 04/07/2022 .400 25,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 100.144000 25,036,000.00 36,000.00FNMA 2Yr 04/15/2022 .440 25,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 100.172000 25,043,000.00 43,000.00

.370 75,000,000.00 75,000,000.00 100.131000 75,098,250.00 98,250.00

3135GA3C33135GA2Z3

3135GA3Z23135G06F5

3134GXBM53134GXBL7

3134GXCF93134GXCF9

1525: FNMA-Fxd-S 30/360

3134GW3X2

3137EAEX3

3135GA3C3

3134GVWM63134GVYX0

3136G43W13135G06A6

3135G06A63135GA2P5

3134GVRV2

3135GA2Z3

3134GXEA8

3136G4Q97

3135GA4R9

3135GA3N9

3135GA4P33135GA5A5

3135G02K8

3136G4XK4

3136G4B77

3134GXEX83134GXGQ1

3135G0T94

3134GXCA03134GXEX8

3136G4YU13136G4C27

3135G0X24

3135GA2Z3

.370 .421 .420

.400 .433 .433

.440 .455 .455

.270 .374 .373

.500 3.603 3.649

.758 3.114 3.161

.600 4.001 4.071

.310 2.031 2.044

.350 2.298 2.315

.420 2.790 2.814

.420 3.019 3.052

.650 3.976 4.052

.350 2.527 2.5452.527 2.545

.560 3.983 4.049

.350

.356 2.488 2.507

.300 2.031 2.044

.573 3.961 4.022

.604 3.941 3.997

.550 3.948 4.014

2.879

.580 3.973

.587 3.918 3.973

.600 3.941 3.997

.5403.918

.560 3.942 3.9953.9923.941

3.825.625 3.767 3.825

.600 3.941 3.997

.320

.600

2.397 2.408

.375 2.320 2.329

2.8033.767 3.822

.450

.400 2.854

.600 3.692 3.745

.700 3.697

2.777

.410 2.760

.650 3.765

3.745

1.787 1.795.550 3.751 3.803

2.784.310

.700 3.697 3.762

.730 3.642 3.707

3.762.600 3.692

.700 3.683 3.745

.740 3.602 3.666

.740 3.619 3.685

1.094 3.084 3.189.650 3.610 3.666

2.495 1.184 1.2192.333 1.801 1.866

2.322 .912 .929

.460 2.797 2.830

.700 4.087 4.167

.220 1.662 1.663

1.577 1.584.256 1.578 1.584

1.120 1.123.200

.270

1.584

.400 2.544

.328 2.053 2.066

.260 1.578

.200 1.059 1.0632.564

.400 2.544 2.564

.328 2.053 2.066

.200 1.059 1.063

3.983 4.049.560 3.983 4.049.190 1.059 1.063

.560

.600 3.965 4.036

.325 2.031 2.044

.280 2.005 2.016

.600 3.965 4.036

.550 3.943 3.995

.497 3.859 3.899

.625 3.933 3.992

.600 3.938 3.995

.500 3.374 3.4083134GWTG1 .600 3.863 3.9183134GWP26

.475 3.364 3.397

.410 2.627 2.649

.540 3.824 3.877

.500 3.581 3.627

.450 2.838 2.866

.540 3.824 3.877

.450 2.835 2.863

.400 2.838 2.863

.510 3.210 3.249

.400 2.838 2.863

.420 2.215 2.2333134GWAL0 .500 2.476 2.4963134GWCM

.500 2.641 2.668

.570 2.677 2.707

.760 3.510 3.575

.650 3.549 3.608

.730 3.512 3.575

.500 2.564 2.592

.750 3.507 3.573

.730 3.512 3.575

3136G43H4

3136G4Z973136G4X40

3136G4F32

3137EAEZ8

3134GW3Y0

3135G06E8

3134GXBM5

3136G45C3

3136G4B77

3134GWT22

3134GXEX8

3134GW3Z7

3134GV5R5

3134GXCA03134GXDG6

3135G03B7

3135G06G3

3134GV3A4

3136G42F9

3136G4H63

3134GWL38

3135G0U43

3136G4D75

3134GWL79

3134GVWM6

3134GVB313134GVE95

3134GWN44

3134GWR32

3134GWP91

3134GWET93134GWL79

3135G06C23135G06C2

3136G4P31

3136G46S7

3136G4XZ13136G4XR9

3136G4J383136G4K51

1576: FNMA-Var-SOFR-Q A/360

3135G03J0

3134GXEA8

3134GXHL1

3134GWL38

3134GWN85

3134GXHH0

3135GAAZ4

3136G46N8

3135G0T78

3135GA2N0


35


Coupon ParValue

BookValue

MarketPrice

MarketValue

UnrealizedGain/Loss

YieldTo Mat

ModifiedDuration

Years ToMaturity


CUSIP

FHLB 5YrNc1YrA 03/25/2026 .850 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.051000 9,905,100.00 -94,900.00FHLB 5YrNc1MoM 06/26/2026 1.070 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.289000 9,928,900.00 -71,100.00FHLB 5YrNc1MoM 07/20/2026 1.130 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.440000 9,944,000.00 -56,000.00FHLB 5YrNc1Mo 06/08/2026 1.000 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 99.148000 14,872,200.00 -127,800.00FHLB 5YrNc1MoM 06/26/2026 1.050 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 99.240000 14,886,000.00 -114,000.00FHLB 5YrNc1MoM 07/06/2026 1.020 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 99.129000 14,869,350.00 -130,650.00FHLB 5YrNc1Mo 09/28/2026 1.040 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 100.000000 15,000,000.00 0.00

1.024 90,000,000.00 90,000,000.00 99.339500 89,405,550.00 -594,450.00

FHLB 4.5 Yr 06/10/2022 2.125 7,975,000.00 7,955,620.75 101.237000 8,073,650.75 118,030.00FHLB 4.9Yr 03/10/2023 2.125 11,750,000.00 11,432,397.50 102.461000 12,039,167.50 606,770.00FHLB 2.91Yr 03/11/2022 2.500 30,000,000.00 30,158,100.00 100.864000 30,259,200.00 101,100.00FHLB 4.25YrNc3MoA 12/09/2024 .500 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.289000 9,928,900.00 -71,100.00FHLB 2 Yr 10/21/2022 .125 10,000,000.00 9,989,900.00 99.978000 9,997,800.00 7,900.00FHLB 3YrNc1YrA 12/22/2023 .190 15,000,000.00 14,979,900.00 99.488000 14,923,200.00 -56,700.00FHLB 3YrNc6MoB 12/28/2023 .250 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.592000 9,959,200.00 -40,800.00FHLB 3.25YrNc6MoA 03/28/2024 .270 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 99.144000 14,871,600.00 -128,400.00FHLB 3.5YrNc1YrB 06/28/2024 .260 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 99.205000 14,880,750.00 -119,250.00FHLB 3.5YrNc1YrB 06/28/2024 .260 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.205000 9,920,500.00 -79,500.00FHLB 3.25YrNc6MoA 03/28/2024 .270 15,000,000.00 14,995,500.00 99.144000 14,871,600.00 -123,900.00FHLB 5YrNc6MoQ 02/18/2026 .600 5,000,000.00 4,996,250.00 98.068000 4,903,400.00 -92,850.00FHLB 5YrNc1YrQ 02/23/2026 .580 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.211000 9,821,100.00 -178,900.00FHLB 4.25Yr1YrQ 05/23/2025 .500 14,750,000.00 14,750,000.00 98.869000 14,583,177.50 -166,822.50FHLB 4.5YrNc1YrQ 08/25/2025 .550 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 98.715000 4,935,750.00 -64,250.00FHLB 5YrNc1YrA 02/25/2026 .580 6,000,000.00 6,000,000.00 98.270000 5,896,200.00 -103,800.00FHLB 5YrNc3MoQ 02/25/2026 .790 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 99.192000 14,878,800.00 -121,200.00FHLB 5YrNc3MoQ 02/25/2026 .790 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.192000 9,919,200.00 -80,800.00FHLB 3.75YrNc6MoB 11/26/2024 .400 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 99.118000 4,955,900.00 -44,100.00FHLB 5YrNc3MoQ 02/26/2026 .850 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.035000 9,903,500.00 -96,500.00FHLB 5YrNc1YrQ 03/16/2026 .700 25,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 98.534000 24,633,500.00 -366,500.00FHLB 5YrNc1YrA 03/18/2026 .750 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.761000 9,876,100.00 -123,900.00FHLB 4.25YrNc1YrQ 06/18/2025 .530 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.873000 9,887,300.00 -112,700.00FHLB 5YrNc1YrA 03/18/2026 .750 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.761000 9,876,100.00 -123,900.00FHLB 5YrNc3MoQ 03/18/2026 .790 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 98.806000 14,820,900.00 -179,100.00FHLB 5YrNc1YrA 03/18/2026 .750 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.761000 9,876,100.00 -123,900.00FHLB 5YrNc1MoM 03/23/2026 1.000 14,625,000.00 14,625,000.00 99.421000 14,540,321.25 -84,678.75FHLB 5YrNc1MoM 03/23/2026 1.000 9,750,000.00 9,750,000.00 99.421000 9,693,547.50 -56,452.50FHLB 5YrNc1MoM 03/23/2026 1.000 14,625,000.00 14,625,000.00 99.421000 14,540,321.25 -84,678.75FHLB 5YrNc1MoM 03/23/2026 1.000 8,921,250.00 8,914,559.06 99.421000 8,869,595.96 -44,963.10FHLB 5YrNc1MoM 03/23/2026 1.000 9,750,000.00 9,750,000.00 99.421000 9,693,547.50 -56,452.50FHLB 5YrNc1MoM 03/23/2026 1.000 19,500,000.00 19,500,000.00 99.421000 19,387,095.00 -112,905.00FHLB 5YrNc1MoM 03/23/2026 1.000 19,500,000.00 19,500,000.00 99.421000 19,387,095.00 -112,905.00FHLB 5YrNc1MoM 03/23/2026 1.000 9,750,000.00 9,750,000.00 99.421000 9,693,547.50 -56,452.50FHLB 4YrNc6MoB 03/24/2025 .700 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.460000 9,946,000.00 -54,000.00FHLB 4YrNc1YrB 03/25/2025 .625 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.337000 9,933,700.00 -66,300.00FHLB 4YrNc1YrB 03/25/2025 .625 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.337000 9,933,700.00 -66,300.00FHLB 4YrNc1YrB 03/25/2025 .625 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.337000 9,933,700.00 -66,300.00FHLB 4YrNc3MoB 03/17/2025 .650 15,000,000.00 14,977,500.00 99.407000 14,911,050.00 -66,450.00FHLB 3.5YrNc6MoQ 09/30/2024 .510 25,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 99.492000 24,873,000.00 -127,000.00FHLB 4.25YrNc6MoQ 06/30/2025 .750 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.384000 9,938,400.00 -61,600.00FHLB 3YrNC3MB 04/08/2024 .375 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.590000 9,959,000.00 -41,000.00FHLB 4YrNC6MoB 04/08/2025 .720 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 99.501000 14,925,150.00 -74,850.00FHLB 3.91YrNC2MoB 03/17/2025 .650 25,000,000.00 24,950,000.00 99.407000 24,851,750.00 -98,250.00FHLB 9Mo 02/01/2022 .045 25,000,000.00 24,998,865.00 99.977000 24,994,250.00 -4,615.00FHLB 5YrNc6MoQ 05/26/2026 1.050 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 99.333000 14,899,950.00 -100,050.00FHLB 5YrNc6MoQ 05/26/2026 1.000 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.188000 9,918,800.00 -81,200.00FHLB 5YrNc6MoQ 05/26/2026 1.030 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 99.284000 4,964,200.00 -35,800.00FHLB 5YrNC1YrB 06/10/2026 1.000 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 99.198000 4,959,900.00 -40,100.00FHLB 5YrNc3MOQ 07/22/2026 1.000 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 99.068000 14,860,200.00 -139,800.00FHLB 5YrNc3MoQ 07/27/2026 1.000 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 99.051000 14,857,650.00 -142,350.00FHLB 5YrNc3MoQ 07/27/2026 1.000 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.051000 9,905,100.00 -94,900.00FHLB 5YrNc3MoA 08/05/2026 1.000 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.356000 9,935,600.00 -64,400.00FHLB 5YrNC1MoM 08/17/2026 1.000 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.212000 9,921,200.00 -78,800.00FHLB 5YrNC1MoM 08/20/2026 1.100 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.275000 9,927,500.00 -72,500.00FHLB 5YrNc6MoQ 08/25/2026 1.000 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.029000 9,902,900.00 -97,100.00FHLB 5YrNc3MoM 08/26/2026 1.000 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 99.376000 14,906,400.00 -93,600.00FHLB 5YrNc3MoQ 08/26/2026 1.000 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 100.000000 15,000,000.00 0.00FHLB 3.25YrNc3MoQ 12/17/2024 .550 10,000,000.00 9,999,000.00 99.423000 9,942,300.00 -56,700.00FHLB 3YrNc3MoQ 09/27/2024 .500 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 100.000000 10,000,000.00 0.00FHLB 5YrNc1Mo 09/28/2026 1.040 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 100.000000 15,000,000.00 0.00FHLB 3YrNc3MoQ 09/30/2024 .570 20,000,000.00 19,988,000.00 99.940000 19,988,000.00 0.00FHLB 5YrNc3MoQ 09/30/2026 1.000 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.869000 9,886,900.00 -113,100.00

.810 791,896,250.00 791,585,592.31 99.416302 787,273,966.71 -4,311,625.60

FFCB DISC NOTE 01/25/2022 .060 17,000,000.00 16,991,330.00 99.988000 16,997,960.00 6,630.00FFCB DISC NOTE 02/16/2022 .050 50,000,000.00 49,980,486.11 99.982000 49,991,000.00 10,513.89FFCB DISC NOTE 05/11/2022 .070 25,000,000.00 24,990,569.44 99.958000 24,989,500.00 -1,069.44

.057 92,000,000.00 91,962,385.55 99.976587 91,978,460.00 16,074.45

FFCB 5Yr 04/11/2023 2.700 10,000,000.00 9,990,300.00 103.398000 10,339,800.00 349,500.00FFCB 5Yr 10/02/2023 3.050 10,000,000.00 9,979,300.00 104.842000 10,484,200.00 504,900.00FFCB 2.9Yr 11/15/2021 3.050 10,000,000.00 10,035,700.00 100.117000 10,011,700.00 -24,000.00FFCB 3Yr 09/06/2022 1.500 14,435,000.00 14,422,874.60 101.189000 14,606,632.15 183,757.55FFCB 4.9Yr 09/17/2024 1.600 6,128,000.00 6,107,471.20 102.335000 6,271,088.80 163,617.60FFCB 4.9Yr 09/10/2024 2.080 2,064,000.00 2,101,585.44 103.687000 2,140,099.68 38,514.24FFCB 4YrNc2YrA 02/28/2024 1.550 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 100.471000 5,023,550.00 23,550.00FFCB 5YrNc2YrA 06/10/2025 .680 5,025,000.00 5,025,000.00 99.277000 4,988,669.25 -36,330.75FFCB 3YrNc1YrA 08/10/2023 .320 15,945,000.00 15,945,000.00 99.845000 15,920,285.25 -24,714.75FFCB 2.5YrNc3MoA 03/15/2023 .220 10,000,000.00 9,992,500.00 99.932000 9,993,200.00 700.00FFCB 3YrNC2YrA 10/20/2023 .270 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.796000 9,979,600.00 -20,400.00FFCB 3YrNc1YrA 11/30/2023 .310 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.654000 9,965,400.00 -34,600.00FFCB 3YrNc2YrA 12/08/2023 .280 9,931,000.00 9,935,667.57 99.735000 9,904,682.85 -30,984.72FFCB 2.5YrNc6MoA 06/15/2023 .200 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 99.807000 14,971,050.00 -28,950.00FFCB 2YrNc1YrA 12/15/2022 .160 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.948000 9,994,800.00 -5,200.00FFCB 2YrNc1YrA 12/15/2022 .160 8,245,000.00 8,245,000.00 99.948000 8,240,712.60 -4,287.40FFCB 3YrNc1YrA 12/21/2023 .210 10,000,000.00 9,992,500.00 99.427000 9,942,700.00 -49,800.00

3130ALKL73130AMT69

1725: FHLB-Fxd-S 30/360

3130ANMH03130ANPF1

1710: FHLB-Fxd-M 30/360

3133EMKH43133EMKH4

3130ALN34

3130ALGJ7

3130ALGJ73130ALGJ7

3133EJKN83133EJD48

313313SF6

3130ANRB83130ANX88

3130AKKF23130AKLB0

3130ALTJ33130ALWL4

3130AMMZ2

3130AKL79

3130ANE48

3130ANBX7

3133EKP753133EKQA7

3133EL7E8

3133EMJQ63133EMKG6

3130ANAJ9

3130ANFD7

3130ANTS9

3133EJT74

3130ANAJ9

3130APBH7

1900: FFCB-DISC NOTE

1925: FFCB-Fxd-S 30/360

3130ALBX1

3130ALF25

3130ALDX9

3130AL2G8

3130APAD7

3130AL6K5

3130AMKB7

3130ALGJ73130ALGJ7

3130ALLP73130ALTH7

3130ALH56

3130ALLP7

3130ALU93

3130ALGJ7

3.453

.060 .235

2.795

.347

.296

2.093

1.688 2.759

2.1311.120 1.123

2.140

2.104.264

.270 1.963 1.970

.250 1.369

.310 2.072 2.082

1.775

1.550 2.278

1.370.320 1.767

2.8632.329

.680 3.549

2.922 .040 .041

3.611

1.529 .8372.882

2.721 1.405 1.4443.095 1.846 1.921

1.672

.347

.849

.236

.070 .525 .526

.050 .296

2.9101.040 4.769 4.912

1.000 4.782 4.9183.524

4.685 4.822.553 3.091

.590 2.887 2.918

3.1322.880

1.000

4.656 4.8051.000 4.683 4.8191.000 4.686 4.822

1.100

4.605 4.7401.000 4.628 4.7641.000 4.661 4.797

1.000

4.475 4.6111.000 4.592 4.7261.000 4.605 4.740

1.000

4.437 4.5701.030 4.433 4.5701.000

3.378.051 .255 .255

1.050 4.430 4.570

.702 3.332

3.666.375 2.422 2.438.720 3.386 3.438

.750 3.601

3.400.688 3.332 3.378.510 2.890 2.918

.625 3.357

3.349 3.397.625 3.357 3.400.625 3.357 3.400

.700

4.285 4.3951.000

4.285 4.3951.000 4.285 4.3951.0001.000

1.015 4.284 4.3954.285 4.395

1.0001.000 4.285 4.395

.750

4.285 4.395

3.584

4.298 4.3811.000 4.285 4.395

.750

4.381

4.298 4.381.700

.790 4.293 4.381

.750 4.298

.8503.045

.790

3.0744.226

4.230.400

3.768 3.819

4.230.580

4.3234.253 4.323

2.398 2.4084.304

.580 4.247

.550

.500 3.518 3.562

.615

.176 .971

.260 2.645 2.660

4.318

.260 2.645 2.660

.279

2.149 2.159.270 2.398 2.408.250

.973.235 2.134 2.142

.359.500 3.072 3.110

2.308 .355

.6082.716 1.325 1.3562.182 .597

4.6731.024 4.559

1.050 4.539 4.6554.682

1.040 4.791 4.9121.020 4.565

1.130 4.592 4.7211.000 4.494 4.605

.850 4.317 4.4001.070 4.537 4.655

4.231

.200

4.323.790

4.326

.530 3.633

4.3754.298

1.618

.235

1.622.160 1.120 1.123.160

.500

.819

313313TD0313313WR5

.057

3130AP5M3

313378WG2

3130ALFN9

3130AK3T1

3130AMWT53130AN3B4

3130ALGR93130ALEH3

3133ELNJ9

3130ANYN4

3130ALGJ7

3133EKM45

3130AMJN3

3133EMKW1

3130ALKF03130ALNK6

3130ALKF0

3130ALEM2

3130ALFW9

3130AKKF2

3130AMEN8

3130ANSC5

3130AKLB0

3130AKDH6

3130AMME9

313382AX1

3130ALGJ7

313379Q69

3130AKKP0

3133ELH803133EL3E2

3133EMDM13133EMHL9

3130AN3R93130AMS52

3130ALHZ03130ALH56

3130ALHG2

3130ALEM2


36


Coupon ParValue

BookValue

MarketPrice

MarketValue

UnrealizedGain/Loss

YieldTo Mat

ModifiedDuration

Years ToMaturity


CUSIP

FFCB 2.75YrNc6MoA 09/22/2023 .190 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.678000 9,967,800.00 -32,200.00FFCB 4YrNc6MoA 12/23/2024 .320 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 98.833000 4,941,650.00 -58,350.00FFCB 3YrNC1YrA 12/21/2023 .210 20,000,000.00 19,985,000.00 99.427000 19,885,400.00 -99,600.00FFCB 4YrNc6MoA 12/23/2024 .320 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 98.833000 14,824,950.00 -175,050.00FFCB 5YrNc6MoA 12/23/2025 .500 12,430,000.00 12,426,271.00 98.144000 12,199,299.20 -226,971.80FFCB 3.25YrNc6MoA 03/28/2024 .270 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.144000 9,914,400.00 -85,600.00FFCB 4YrNc6MoA 12/23/2024 .320 10,000,000.00 9,992,500.00 98.833000 9,883,300.00 -109,200.00FFCB 1.75YrNc6MoA 09/22/2022 .120 15,000,000.00 14,991,000.00 99.948000 14,992,200.00 1,200.00FFCB 3YrNC1YrA 12/28/2023 .210 15,000,000.00 14,988,750.00 99.241000 14,886,150.00 -102,600.00FFCB 3.9YrNc1.9YrA 12/28/2023 .210 10,000,000.00 9,990,000.00 99.241000 9,924,100.00 -65,900.00FFCB 2Yr 01/12/2023 .120 25,000,000.00 24,997,500.00 99.867000 24,966,750.00 -30,750.00FFCB 4rNC1YrA 03/03/2025 .480 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 99.031000 4,951,550.00 -48,450.00FFCB 4YrNC1YrA 03/03/2025 .480 10,000,000.00 9,987,500.00 99.031000 9,903,100.00 -84,400.00FFCB 3Yr 03/18/2024 .300 25,000,000.00 24,994,675.00 99.150000 24,787,500.00 -207,175.00FHLB 4YrNc1YrA 04/01/2025 .710 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.486000 9,948,600.00 -51,400.00FFCB 4YrNc1YrA 04/01/2025 .710 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.486000 9,948,600.00 -51,400.00FFCB 3YrNC1YrA 04/05/2024 .330 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.465000 9,946,500.00 -53,500.00FFCB 1Yr 05/17/2022 .060 50,000,000.00 49,998,575.00 99.983000 49,991,500.00 -7,075.00FFCB 5YrNc2YrA 05/18/2026 .900 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 99.094000 4,954,700.00 -45,300.00FFCB 5YrNc6MoA 07/13/2026 .990 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 100.000000 10,000,000.00 0.00FFCB 5YrNc6MoA 07/13/2026 .990 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 100.000000 10,000,000.00 0.00

.557 454,203,000.00 454,124,669.81 99.866408 453,596,219.78 -528,450.03

FFCB 2.3Yr 02/21/2023 .156 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 100.108000 15,016,200.00 16,200.00.156 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 100.108000 15,016,200.00 16,200.00

FFCB 3Yr 11/07/2022 .360 25,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 100.310000 25,077,500.00 77,500.00FFCB 3Yr 11/07/2022 .360 25,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 100.310000 25,077,500.00 77,500.00FFCB 3Yr 11/07/2022 .360 25,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 100.310000 25,077,500.00 77,500.00FFCB 3Yr 11/07/2022 .360 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 100.310000 15,046,500.00 46,500.00FFCB 3Yr 11/07/2022 .360 25,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 100.310000 25,077,500.00 77,500.00FFCB 3Yr 12/09/2022 .370 9,000,000.00 9,000,000.00 100.338000 9,030,420.00 30,420.00FFCB 3Yr 12/09/2022 .370 24,000,000.00 24,000,000.00 100.338000 24,081,120.00 81,120.00FFCB 3Yr 12/09/2022 .370 24,000,000.00 24,000,000.00 100.338000 24,081,120.00 81,120.00FFCB 3Yr 12/09/2022 .370 24,000,000.00 24,000,000.00 100.338000 24,081,120.00 81,120.00FFCB 3Yr 12/09/2022 .370 14,000,000.00 14,000,000.00 100.338000 14,047,320.00 47,320.00FFCB 3Yr 12/09/2022 .370 24,000,000.00 24,000,000.00 100.338000 24,081,120.00 81,120.00

.365 234,000,000.00 234,000,000.00 100.324239 234,758,720.00 758,720.00

FAMCA 4.9Yr 06/30/2023 2.850 10,000,000.00 9,947,900.00 104.060000 10,406,000.00 458,100.002.850 10,000,000.00 9,947,900.00 104.060000 10,406,000.00 458,100.00

STATE OF HAWAII 01/01/2022 2.770 3,500,000.00 3,500,000.00 100.000000 3,500,000.00 0.00SIER JT COM GO 08/01/2024 .354 720,000.00 720,000.00 100.000000 720,000.00 0.00SIER JT COM GO 08/01/2024 .344 500,000.00 500,000.00 100.000000 500,000.00 0.00SIER JT COM GO 08/01/2023 .229 260,000.00 260,000.00 100.000000 260,000.00 0.00SIER JT COM GO 08/01/2022 .179 205,000.00 205,000.00 100.000000 205,000.00 0.00SIER JT COM GO 08/01/2022 .179 260,000.00 260,000.00 100.000000 260,000.00 0.00SANTA CLARA USD GO 07/01/2022 .160 8,770,000.00 8,770,000.00 100.000000 8,770,000.00 0.00SANTA CLARA USD GO 07/01/2023 .210 2,870,000.00 2,870,000.00 100.000000 2,870,000.00 0.00SAN DIEGUITO USD GO 08/01/2022 .175 425,000.00 425,000.00 100.000000 425,000.00 0.00SAN DIEGUITO USD GO 08/01/2023 .275 425,000.00 425,000.00 100.000000 425,000.00 0.00SAN DIEGUITO USD GO 08/01/2023 .275 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 100.000000 1,000,000.00 0.00SAN DIEGUITO USD GO 08/01/2022 .175 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 100.000000 1,000,000.00 0.00CITY CNT SAN FRANSISCO GO 06/15/2022 .250 29,250,000.00 29,277,495.00 100.094000 29,277,495.00 0.00OCESCD UNS GO 08/01/2022 .290 125,000.00 125,000.00 100.000000 125,000.00 0.00STATE OF WASHINGTON GO 08/01/2024 .470 14,995,000.00 14,995,000.00 100.000000 14,995,000.00 0.00SANTA MONICA-MALIBU USD 08/01/2022 .142 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 100.000000 1,000,000.00 0.00SANTA MONICA-MALIBU USD 08/01/2025 .669 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 100.000000 1,000,000.00 0.00SANTA MONICA-MALIBU USD 08/01/2024 .396 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 100.000000 1,000,000.00 0.00POMONA USD GO 11/01/2021 .160 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 100.000000 1,000,000.00 0.00MARIN CMNTY CLG GO 08/01/2025 .763 1,065,000.00 1,065,000.00 100.000000 1,065,000.00 0.00MARIN CMNTY CLG GO 08/01/2022 .176 990,000.00 990,000.00 100.000000 990,000.00 0.00SAN MATEO USD GO 09/01/2023 .256 500,000.00 500,000.00 100.000000 500,000.00 0.00SAN MATEO USD GO 09/01/2022 .166 500,000.00 500,000.00 100.000000 500,000.00 0.00HAWAII STATE 10/01/2022 .247 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 100.000000 10,000,000.00 0.00HAWAII STATE 10/01/2023 .422 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 100.000000 10,000,000.00 0.00HAWAII STATE 10/01/2024 .713 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 100.000000 10,000,000.00 0.00HAWAII STATE 10/01/2025 2.750 12,775,000.00 13,625,815.00 106.660000 13,625,815.00 0.00HAWAII STATE 10/01/2022 .247 2,305,000.00 2,305,000.00 100.000000 2,305,000.00 0.00HAWAII STATE 10/01/2023 .422 3,260,000.00 3,260,000.00 100.000000 3,260,000.00 0.00HAWAII STATE 10/01/2024 .713 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00 100.000000 2,500,000.00 0.00HAWAII STATE 10/01/2025 1.033 3,660,000.00 3,660,000.00 100.000000 3,660,000.00 0.00HAWAII STATE 02/01/2022 .247 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 100.000000 5,000,000.00 0.00HAWAII STATE 08/01/2022 .247 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 100.000000 10,000,000.00 0.00HAWAII STATE 08/01/2023 .422 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 100.000000 15,000,000.00 0.00HAWAII STATE 08/01/2024 .713 9,000,000.00 9,000,000.00 100.000000 9,000,000.00 0.00HAWAII STATE 08/01/2025 1.033 6,250,000.00 6,250,000.00 100.000000 6,250,000.00 0.00SAN DIEGO USD GO 01/01/2022 .160 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00 100.000000 2,500,000.00 0.00SAN DIEGO USD GO 01/01/2022 .160 5,120,000.00 5,120,000.00 100.000000 5,120,000.00 0.00BEAUMONT USD GO 08/01/2025 1.109 500,000.00 500,000.00 100.000000 500,000.00 0.00BEAUMONT USD GO 08/01/2022 .278 225,000.00 225,000.00 100.000000 225,000.00 0.00BEAUMONT USD GO 08/01/2024 .690 275,000.00 275,000.00 100.000000 275,000.00 0.00LIVERMORE VLY USD GO 12/01/2021 .120 2,250,000.00 2,250,000.00 100.000000 2,250,000.00 0.00

.613 181,980,000.00 182,858,310.00 100.482641 182,858,310.00 0.00

VENTURA COUNTY TRAN 07/01/2022 .250 30,000,000.00 30,027,900.00 100.093000 30,027,900.00 0.00VENTURA COUNTY TRAN 07/01/2022 .250 15,000,000.00 15,016,350.00 100.109000 15,016,350.00 0.00VENTURA COUNTY TRAN 07/01/2022 .250 35,000,000.00 35,041,650.00 100.119000 35,041,650.00 0.00

.250 80,000,000.00 80,085,900.00 100.107375 80,085,900.00 0.00

ROYAL BANK OF CANADA 01/10/2022 .170 25,000,000.00 24,968,125.00 99.980556 24,995,138.89 27,013.89JP MORGAN 03/28/2022 .170 50,000,000.00 49,936,250.00 99.959167 49,979,583.33 43,333.33JP MORGAN 03/28/2022 .170 50,000,000.00 49,936,250.00 99.959167 49,979,583.33 43,333.33NATL SEC CLEARING CORP 03/25/2022 .090 50,000,000.00 49,966,625.00 99.960000 49,980,000.00 13,375.00NATL SEC CLEARING CORP 03/25/2022 .090 50,000,000.00 49,966,625.00 99.960000 49,980,000.00 13,375.00NATL SEC CLEARING CORP 03/22/2022 .090 85,000,000.00 84,944,112.50 99.960833 84,966,708.33 22,595.83JP MORGAN 04/08/2022 .170 35,000,000.00 34,955,705.56 99.956111 34,984,638.89 28,933.33

3020: COMMERCIAL PAPER

3133ELCX0

799017XS2419792A55

419792D45419792F50

3133EMUP5

3133EMZJ43133EMZS4

3133EMQ62

1935: FFCB-Var-SOFR-M A/360

826239GH2

419792A89

675383TG8

732098PT9

93974ETF3802498YW9

3133EMUP5

797356EJ7

63763QCR663763QCN5

923035BS7923035BS7

2360: MUNIS-A 30/360

2350: MUNIS-S 30/360

3133EMSC73133EMSC73133EMTW2

3133EMQ62

3133EM7M8

3133EK6V3

46640QD81

56781RKT3

8014952P6

419792C95

.090 .388 .389

.170 .435 .436

.397 .397.090 .397 .397

63763QCR6 .090

.140

.160

.25656781RKQ9 .176 .749 .751

1.836

.003

3133EMML3

.354

.370

.156

826239GF6

3132X03B5

.344

.131

.141

.120

.713

.160

.405

2.753.085

.170

.690

.170.170 .170

3.662 3.753

.170

.170

2.719

.136

.749.278

1.751

.477

1.109.751

419792F84

074437HA5

2.7173.667419792F92 3.7531.033

.2471.741

.170

2.9213.827 3.921

.254 .255

.749 .751

.918

.713

1.827

1.033.247

.713

.422

1.9072.880

.422

.832

1.907

.235

2.732

.155 .891

2.150

4.089

.003

1.004

.506

.370

.512 3.305

.480

.360

3.306

1.107

.3651.093 1.1071.093

1.049 1.064

.749 .751.210 1.662

.6661.666

.666.160

.175

.751

.751.179

.749

1.745 1.751.749

.179

.229

1.663

2.753

2.770 .1702.7532.732

.167

2.964 1.6012.964 1.601 1.663

1.107

.370 1.093 1.1071.093 1.107.370

.370 1.093

1.019.370 1.093 1.107.360

1.019.360 1.004 1.019

1.004

1.004

1.019.360 1.004 1.019

1.310

.360

1.304

2.076

.156 1.304 1.310

2.053.569

4.701.990 4.568 4.701.990

.542.900 4.428 4.548

4.568

2.430.063 .544

3.419.710 3.368 3.419.330 2.416

3.340.307.710 3.368

2.159

2.369 2.381

.125 1.196 1.2003.340

.244

.893.235 2.151 2.159

.320 3.123

.270 2.398 2.408

.339 3.122 3.148

4.148

.190 1.887 1.893

.320 3.123 3.148

.751

1.743.275 1.751

3.1482.131 2.140

.622

2.753

.275 1.743

.175

.141 .621

2.727

1.751.749

.290 .748

.749

2.7532.731

.751

.751.142.470

3133EK6V3

3133EMVD1

802498YZ2

799017XT0

.669 3.693 3.753

.166

.396

.763 3.686 3.753

2.921

1.033

3.722 3.921.915

.836.247 .915 .918

1.918

.664 .666

.085

.160

2.753

1.918

.247

2.880

1.722 1.752

.405 .405

.664 .666

.194 .195

.664 .666

3133EMKW1

.405

.422

.664 .666923035BS7

3130AKKF23133EMLP5

419792A71

3133ELCX0

797508JS8

3133EMLP53133EMLR1

3133EMLF73133EMLT73133EMLT7

538310P23

074437GY4

419792F76

802498YY5

3133ELCX0

074437HB3

3133EMLE03133EMLP5

78015DAA846640QCU346640QCU3

419792D37

3133EK6V3

1936: FFCB-Var-SOFR-Q A/360

3133EK6V3

1950: FMAC-Fxd-S 30/360

3133ELCX0

3133EK6V33133ELCX0

3133ELCX0

419792YL4

826239FY6826239FX8

826239FW08014952N1

797508JT6797508HV3

419792F68

797356DV1

419792D29

419792A63

797508HU579773KGV0


37


Coupon ParValue

BookValue

MarketPrice

MarketValue

UnrealizedGain/Loss

YieldTo Mat

ModifiedDuration

Years ToMaturity


CUSIP

NATL SEC CLEARING CORP 01/25/2022 .060 90,000,000.00 89,973,600.00 99.976389 89,978,750.00 5,150.00RABOBANKNY 02/14/2022 .110 50,000,000.00 49,972,652.78 99.970833 49,985,416.67 12,763.89RABO BANK 02/15/2022 .110 50,000,000.00 49,972,652.78 99.970556 49,985,277.78 12,625.00NATL SEC CLEARING CORP 01/12/2022 .070 20,000,000.00 19,994,633.33 99.980000 19,996,000.00 1,366.67NATL SEC CLEARING CORP 01/12/2022 .070 15,000,000.00 14,996,325.00 99.980000 14,997,000.00 675.00TOYOTA MOTOR CORP 11/04/2021 .080 30,000,000.00 29,996,666.67 99.999167 29,999,750.00 3,083.33APPLE 01/12/2022 .050 50,000,000.00 49,991,805.56 99.980000 49,990,000.00 -1,805.56APPLE 01/21/2022 .050 40,000,000.00 39,993,166.67 99.977500 39,991,000.00 -2,166.67PROCTER & GAMBLE 01/26/2022 .050 50,000,000.00 49,991,180.56 99.976111 49,988,055.56 -3,125.00NATL SEC CLEARING CORP 01/12/2022 .070 20,000,000.00 19,995,877.78 99.980000 19,996,000.00 122.22PROCTER & GAMBLE 01/07/2022 .050 28,500,000.00 28,496,041.67 99.981389 28,494,695.83 -1,345.84APPLE 01/12/2022 .050 50,000,000.00 49,992,708.33 99.980000 49,990,000.00 -2,708.33PROCTER & GAMBEL 01/10/2022 .050 50,000,000.00 49,992,847.22 99.980556 49,990,277.78 -2,569.44COLGATE-PALM 11/17/2021 .050 30,000,000.00 29,997,958.33 99.995556 29,998,666.67 708.34APPLE 01/21/2022 .050 40,000,000.00 39,993,944.44 99.977500 39,991,000.00 -2,944.44NATL SEC CLEARING CORP 01/26/2022 .060 40,000,000.00 39,992,400.00 99.976111 39,990,444.44 -1,955.56APPLE 01/12/2022 .050 30,000,000.00 29,995,875.00 99.980000 29,994,000.00 -1,875.00BANK OF AMERICA 11/12/2021 .060 25,000,000.00 24,998,416.67 99.996944 24,999,236.11 819.44BANK OF AMERICA 11/08/2021 .060 7,000,000.00 6,999,603.33 99.998056 6,999,863.89 260.56BANK OF AMERICA 11/08/2021 .070 4,500,000.00 4,499,728.75 99.998056 4,499,912.50 183.75APPLE 01/06/2022 .050 55,000,000.00 54,993,125.00 99.981667 54,989,916.67 -3,208.33PROCTER & GAMBLE 02/03/2022 .060 25,000,000.00 24,995,541.67 99.973889 24,993,472.22 -2,069.45ARCHER DANIELS MIDLAND 11/01/2021 .050 75,000,000.00 74,998,958.33 100.000000 75,000,000.00 1,041.67TOYOTA MOTOR CORP 12/10/2021 .070 50,000,000.00 49,995,722.22 99.989167 49,994,583.33 -1,138.89

.080 1,270,000,000.00 1,269,495,125.15 99.976297 1,269,698,972.22 203,847.07

TORONTO DOMINION 11/03/2021 .170 115,000,000.00 115,000,000.00 100.000000 115,000,000.00 0.00ROYAL BANK OF CANADA 11/17/2021 .160 115,000,000.00 115,000,000.00 100.000000 115,000,000.00 0.00ROYAL BANK OF CANADA 11/24/2021 .170 7,000,000.00 7,000,000.00 100.000000 7,000,000.00 0.00TORONTO DOMINION 11/30/2021 .160 7,000,000.00 7,000,000.00 100.000000 7,000,000.00 0.00TORONTO DOMINION 12/30/2021 .170 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 100.000000 15,000,000.00 0.00BMO YCD 11/08/2021 .170 60,000,000.00 60,000,000.00 100.000000 60,000,000.00 0.00BMO YCD 01/03/2022 .190 60,000,000.00 60,000,000.00 100.000000 60,000,000.00 0.00BMO 01/10/2022 .150 25,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 100.000000 25,000,000.00 0.00ROYAL BANK OF CANADA 02/22/2022 .130 50,000,000.00 50,000,000.00 100.000000 50,000,000.00 0.00ROYAL BANK OF CANADA 03/22/2022 .130 50,000,000.00 50,000,000.00 100.000000 50,000,000.00 0.00ROYAL BANK OF CANADA 04/18/2022 .150 50,000,000.00 50,000,000.00 100.000000 50,000,000.00 0.00ROYAL BANK OF CANADA 05/06/2022 .160 45,000,000.00 45,000,000.00 100.000000 45,000,000.00 0.00NORDEA BK 02/22/2022 .130 50,000,000.00 50,000,000.00 100.000000 50,000,000.00 0.00NORDEA BK 02/22/2022 .130 50,000,000.00 50,000,000.00 100.000000 50,000,000.00 0.00TD YCD 05/16/2022 .170 55,000,000.00 55,000,000.00 100.000000 55,000,000.00 0.00TORONTO DOMINION 01/20/2022 .110 20,000,000.00 20,000,000.00 100.000000 20,000,000.00 0.00NORDEA BK 11/18/2021 .090 50,000,000.00 50,000,000.00 100.000000 50,000,000.00 0.00NORDEA BK 11/19/2021 .090 50,000,000.00 50,000,000.00 100.000000 50,000,000.00 0.00NORDEA BK 03/09/2022 .140 30,000,000.00 29,999,998.84 99.999996 29,999,998.84 0.00RABOBANK YCD 05/10/2022 .200 30,000,000.00 30,008,603.09 100.028677 30,008,603.09 0.00BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA 04/07/2022 .230 2,200,000.00 2,200,963.86 100.043812 2,200,963.86 0.00NORDEA BK 11/23/2021 .080 35,000,000.00 35,000,000.00 100.000000 35,000,000.00 0.00TORONTO DOMINION 01/24/2022 .100 25,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 100.000000 25,000,000.00 0.00TORONTO DOMINION 11/29/2021 .090 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 100.000000 15,000,000.00 0.00ROYAL BANK OF CANADA 05/16/2022 .160 25,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 100.000000 25,000,000.00 0.00TORONTO DOMINION 06/13/2022 .150 30,000,000.00 30,000,000.00 100.000000 30,000,000.00 0.00BMO YCD 06/23/2022 .150 55,000,000.00 55,000,000.00 100.000000 55,000,000.00 0.00BMO YCD 05/05/2022 .160 50,000,000.00 50,000,000.00 100.000000 50,000,000.00 0.00TORONTO DOMINION 07/08/2022 .200 45,000,000.00 45,000,000.00 100.000000 45,000,000.00 0.00BANK OF MONTREAL YCD 07/18/2022 .210 25,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 100.000000 25,000,000.00 0.00BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA 04/13/2022 .220 8,200,000.00 8,201,926.72 100.023497 8,201,926.72 0.00TORONTO DOMINION YCD 10/27/2022 .300 45,000,000.00 45,000,000.00 100.000000 45,000,000.00 0.00

.155 1,294,400,000.00 1,294,411,492.51 100.000888 1,294,411,492.51 0.00

BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA 07/08/2022 .160 50,000,000.00 50,000,000.00 100.000000 50,000,000.00 0.00BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA 05/16/2022 .140 50,000,000.00 50,000,000.00 100.000000 50,000,000.00 0.00

.150 100,000,000.00 100,000,000.00 100.000000 100,000,000.00 0.00

IFC3.5Yr 08/22/2024 .250 25,000,000.00 24,980,250.00 98.491000 24,622,750.00 -357,500.00IFC 3Yr 09/23/2024 .440 25,000,000.00 24,967,250.00 99.869000 24,967,250.00 0.00IFC 3Yr 10/29/2024 .680 25,000,000.00 24,971,175.00 99.884700 24,971,175.00 0.00

.457 75,000,000.00 74,918,675.00 99.414900 74,561,175.00 -357,500.00

.311 9,438,018,483.59 9,437,887,551.30 99.836376 9,422,575,640.92 -15,311,910.38

.311 9,438,018,483.59 9,437,887,551.30 99.836376 9,422,575,640.92 -15,311,910.38Grand Total .303 1.252 1.269

Total Fund .303 1.252 1.269

4595OVQL7 .719 2.958 2.997.493 2.875 2.903

45950VPQ3 .273 2.795 2.81145950VQG4 .484 2.871 2.899

.150 .614 .6136040: IFC-Fxd-S 30/360

06417MRX5 .160 .686 .68506417MSB2 .140 .541 .540

.154 .312 .3124520: NCD-Var-SOFR-Q A/360

06417MNM3 .170 .448 .44989114WJP1 .300 .985 .989

89114WHT5 .200 .683 .68506367CMV6 .210 .710 .712

06367CM53 .150 .642 .64406367CME4 .160 .508 .510

.07978012UU29 .160 .538 .54089114WG41 .150 .615 .616

21684XQS806417MNJ0

89114WEW189114WFB6 .090 .079

63763QAC174271UA75

4500: NCD-Mat A/360

.388 .389

.150 .194 .19578012UQ57 .130 .312 .312

06367CE60 .170 .022 .022.190 .175 .175

.160 .082 .082

.170 .164 .164

78012UH24 .160 .046 .04778012UH81 .170 .066 .066

89114W3D5 .170 .008 .008

.070 .109 .110

.080 .236 .237

03785EAM6

06054NY88

03785EAC806054NYC9

.050 .003 .00374271UB33

.050 .183 .184

.060 .260 .260

.060 .022 .022

.070 .022 .022

.050 .200 .200

.060 .033 .033

.047.050 .224 .225

63763QAS6 .060 .238 .238

.050 .200 .200

19416EYH4.050 .194 .19574271UAA8.050 .047

63763QAC189233GY42

03785EAM6 .050 .224

.070 .200 .200

.050 .186 .186

.22503785EAC8

.050 .238 .238

.080 .011 .011

.050 .200 .200

63763QAC1.070 .200 .200

.110 .293 .293

.070 .200 .200

63763QAR8 .060 .235 .236.110 .290 .29021687BBE0

21687BBF7

03785EAC8

74271UAS9

89114W3Z689114W6J9

06367CE5206367CEJ2

06054NY8803785EA61

03948GY1589233GZA7

78012UQ6578012UQ73 .150 .462 .46378012UR80 .160 .511 .512

.130

65558UFJ6 .130 .312 .31265558UFJ6 .130 .312 .31289114WEK7 .170 .538 .54089114WEM3 .110 .222 .222

.090 .049 .049

.090 .052 .05265558UFN765558UFL1

.063 .063

65558UEU2 .140 .353 .353.160 .522 .523

.100 .232 .233

.160 .432 .43365558UFS6 .080


38

COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE TREASURER-TAX COLLECTOR

The Mission Inn, Downtown Riverside. Digital Image. The Mission Inn. http://www.missioninn.com/about-en.html.

39


CAPITAL MARKETS

COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CENTER 4080 LEMON STREET,

4TH FLOOR, RIVERSIDE, CA 92502-2205

WWW.COUNTYTREASURER.ORG

40

https://www.countytreasurer.org/Treasurer/TreasurersPooledInvestmentFund/MonthlyReports.aspx


Investment Fund

November 2021

ATTACHMENT 3

41

Contents



3| Economy

4| Market Data

6| Portfolio Data



42
















John Byerly



Isela Licea




November saw Covid worries resurface with the emergence of the Omicron variant. This put the markets on high alert as investors be-gan to focus on the December 15th FOMC meeting. Would the Fed temper their ex-pected announcement of a bond purchase taper or would they look past the Covid con-cern and focus on inflation? As the month proceeded and the severity of an economic impact associated with Omicron diminished, the consensus shifted in favor of the Fed be-coming more hawkish due to inflation con-cerns. While still unlikely, Fed Funds futures expectation of a rate hike as early as mid-March jumped 75% over the course of Novem-ber. For depositors like TPIF, the prospect of improved short-term rates looks closer at hand. Most economic indicators released in No-vember continued to show strong growth. Arguably the strongest was a new range in the Initial Jobless Claims releases which fell to 199,000 in early November, the lowest print since 1969. Employers are struggling to find good help, so it makes sense that they would be reluctant to hand out pink slips in such an environment. Another employment related report was the Nonfarm Payrolls which sur-

passed expectations, showing 531,000 jobs were created, further supporting the view that the labor market is still strong. Hiring gains were widespread, with notable strength in leisure & hospitality (+164K), manufacturing (+60K) and transportation & warehousing (+54K), sectors that are well represented in Riverside County. Limited labor availability continues to be the largest challenge for the job market and a major source of inflation. Demand for workers is exceptionally strong, exemplified by the level of job openings, and the share of small businesses having openings they could not fill, near record levels. While stimulus is fading, consumers are get-ting a more durable boost to income from wages & salaries, which rose another 0.8% for the month. Just since the start of the year, wages & salaries have jumped 7.6%, which is the largest year-to-date gain in 42 years. Ris-ing labor costs combined with persistent sup-ply chain constraints are sending prices higher as firms try to pass the cost hikes on to con-sumers. The Fed acknowledged in November that substantial progress has been made on its inflation goal and announced that it would begin tapering its asset purchases. Both infla-tion and economic data support the expecta-

tion that the Fed will move sooner than previ-ously expected. Economic practitioners see the odds of higher short-term rates increasing. Housing prices continued their quick climb, with Riverside County claiming one of the strongest price increases of any area in the United States. The median price for single family homes in Riverside County is now $550,000 which is 17% higher than one year ago and up 120% over the last 10 years. The 1-year T-Bill yield experienced the most uplift during the month, rising 10 basis points to 0.22%. Bond yields were relatively stable dur-ing November, with the 2-year Treasury yield rising from 0.50% to 0.56% over the month. The 5-year Treasury yield began the month at 1.17% and ended the month at 1.16%. Stocks dropped in November due to the fear that future higher interest rates would slow eco-nomic growth, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average beginning at 35,900 and ending at 34,500.


Monthly Commentary COVID Worries Resurface





Nov-21 9,154,079,077.30 9,175,074,689.36 (20,995,612.06) -0.229% 0.33 1.31

Oct-21 9,422,575,640.92 9,437,887,551.30 (15,311,910.38) -0.162% 0.30 1.27

Sep-21 9,560,644,555.86 9,562,128,367.46 (1,483,811.61) -0.015% 0.28 1.19

Aug-21 9,005,666,395.48 8,998,636,800.02 7,029,595.46 0.078% 0.29 1.21

Jul-21 8,738,462,044.75 8,729,419,196.20 9,042,848.55 0.104% 0.30 1.24

Jun-21 9,505,561,665.45 9,503,657,508.92 1,904,156.53 0.020% 0.27 1.15 *Market values do not include accrued interest.

43


Economy




New Home Sales SAAR

Key Economic Indicators Release Date Indicator Actual Consensus Prior Year

11/24/2021 Real GDP - Q/Q Change 2.1% 2.2% 33.1%

11/05/2021 Unemployment Rate - Seasonally Adjusted 4.6% 4.7% 6.9% 11/05/2021 Non-Farm Payrolls - M/M Change - Thousands 531 450 638 11/10/2021 CPI - Y/Y Change 6.2% 5.9% 1.2% 11/10/2021 CPI Ex Food and Energy - Y/Y Change 4.6% 4.3% 1.6% 11/03/2021 ISM Non-Manufacturing Index (> 50 indicates growth) 66.7 62.0 56.6 11/24/2021 New Home Sales - SAAR - Thousands 745 800 999 11/03/2021 Factory Orders - M/M Change 0.2% 0.1% 1.1% 11/03/2021 Durable Goods Orders - New Orders - M/M Change -0.3% -0.4% 1.9% *Note: 'Prior Year' displays final estimates of indicator values from the equivalent period of the prior year.

44



report.


employment have continued to strengthen, but risks to the economic outlook remain.


The FOMC stated in their November statement, they will begin reducing the monthly pace of its net asset purchases by $10 billion for Treasury securities and $5 billion for agency mortgage-backed securities.




45



U.S. Treasuries


Commodities

Stocks

46






Portfolio Data




Month Monthly Re-





Year 12/2021 134.00 12/2021 2,634.19 1,400.00 1234.19 1,368.19 1,211.31 01/2022 1,150.00 2,000.00 -850.00 518.19 1,206.58 02/2022 1,100.00 1,500.00 -400.00 118.19 760.00 03/2022 1,300.00 1,551.62 -251.62 133.43 - 553.00 04/2022 2,476.30 1,542.08 934.22 934.22 145.40 05/2022 1,700.00 2,200.00 -500.00 434.22 555.00 06/2022 2,000.00 2,400.00 -400.00 34.22 202.23 07/2022 1,500.00 1,800.00 -300.00 265.78 - 258.77 08/2022 1,398.14 1,552.97 -154.83 154.83 - 165.23 09/2022 2,050.00 1,804.41 245.59 245.59 84.94 10/2022 1,500.00 1,700.00 -200.00 45.59 267.31 11/2022 1,600.00 1,700.00 -100.00 54.41 - 200.00 TOTALS 20,408.63 21,151.08 (742.45) 608.45 3,832.41 5,609.75 8,566.62 6.63% 61.14% 93.37%

47



TIMMI




COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE TREASURER-TAX COLLECTOR 7 48







Compliance Report



Maturity

Authorized % Limit

S&P/ Moody's

Maximum Remaining

Maturity

Authorized % Limit





GRADE 0.00%









A1/P1/F1 0.0%






LIQUIDITY 20% AAA by 2 Of 3

RATINGS AGC.

5.35%


LIQUIDITY Max


CASH/DEPOSIT AC-COUNT NA NA NA NA NA NA .57%

49


Coupon ParValue

BookValue

MarketPrice

MarketValue

UnrealizedGain/Loss

FIDELITY GOV 12/01/2021 .010 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 100.000000 1,000,000.00 0.00FEDERATED GOV 12/01/2021 .025 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 100.000000 1,000,000.00 0.00WELLS FARGO GOV 12/01/2021 .025 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 100.000000 1,000,000.00 0.00BLACKROCK GOV 12/01/2021 .025 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 100.000000 1,000,000.00 0.00GOLDMAN SACHS GOV 12/01/2021 .026 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 100.000000 1,000,000.00 0.00MORGAN STANLEY PRIME 12/01/2021 .060 49,990,002.00 50,000,000.00 100.020000 50,000,000.00 0.00JPM PRIME - UNITY NATIONAL BANK 12/01/2021 .066 99,960,015.99 100,000,000.00 100.040000 100,000,000.00 0.00

JPM GOV-LIBERY BANK AND TRUST 12/01/2021 .026 86,000,000.00 86,000,000.00 100.000000 86,000,000.00 0.00


JPM PRIME - UNITY NATIONAL BANK 12/01/2021 .066 99,960,015.99 100,000,000.00 100.040000 100,000,000.00 0.00

JPM PRIME - UNITY NATIONAL BANK 12/01/2021 .066 99,960,015.99 100,000,000.00 100.040000 100,000,000.00 0.00

.058 490,850,057.97 491,000,000.00 100.030547 491,000,000.00 0.00


BANK OF THE WEST 12/01/2021 .050 52,000,000.00 52,000,000.00 100.000000 52,000,000.00 0.00.050 52,000,000.00 52,000,000.00 100.000000 52,000,000.00 0.00


.000 0.00 0.00 .000000 0.00 0.00

U.S. TREASURY BILL 02/24/2022 .052 50,000,000.00 49,975,930.00 99.989000 49,994,500.00 18,570.00U.S. TREASURY BILL 02/24/2022 .055 50,000,000.00 49,975,128.47 99.989000 49,994,500.00 19,371.53U.S. TREASURY BILL 03/24/2022 .057 50,000,000.00 49,972,377.78 99.982000 49,991,000.00 18,622.22U.S. TREASURY BILL 03/24/2022 .032 50,000,000.00 49,986,218.75 99.982000 49,991,000.00 4,781.25U.S. TREASURY BILL 06/16/2022 .070 50,000,000.00 49,964,661.67 99.948000 49,974,000.00 9,338.33U.S. TREASURY BILL 02/24/2022 .050 75,000,000.00 74,974,375.00 99.989000 74,991,750.00 17,375.00U.S. TREASURY BILL 10/06/2022 .118 25,000,000.00 24,971,767.36 99.899146 24,974,786.46 3,019.10U.S. TREASURY BILL 01/11/2022 .053 35,000,000.00 34,996,120.83 99.994021 34,997,907.29 1,786.46U.S. TREASURY BILL 02/22/2022 .050 50,000,000.00 49,991,875.00 99.988472 49,994,236.11 2,361.11U.S. TREASURY BILL 10/06/2022 .116 110,000,000.00 109,878,425.56 99.900433 109,890,476.67 12,051.11U.S. TREASURY BILL 12/15/2021 .100 50,000,000.00 49,993,666.67 99.996306 49,998,152.78 4,486.11U.S. TREASURY BILL 12/15/2021 .100 50,000,000.00 49,993,333.33 99.996111 49,998,055.55 4,722.22U.S. TREASURY BILL 12/28/2021 .100 50,000,000.00 49,994,583.33 99.992500 49,996,250.00 1,666.67U.S. TREASURY BILL 12/23/2021 .100 50,000,000.00 49,995,277.78 99.992000 49,996,000.00 722.22U.S. TREASURY BILL 12/30/2021 .104 50,000,000.00 49,994,077.78 99.993000 49,996,500.00 2,422.22U.S. TREASURY BILL 12/21/2021 .100 50,000,000.00 49,995,555.56 99.996000 49,998,000.00 2,444.44U.S. TREASURY BILL 12/28/2021 .100 50,000,000.00 49,994,583.33 99.992500 49,996,250.00 1,666.67

.081 895,000,000.00 894,647,958.20 99.974678 894,773,364.86 125,406.66

U.S. TREASURY BOND 11/30/2024 1.500 25,000,000.00 24,705,078.13 102.004000 25,501,000.00 795,921.87U.S. TREASURY BOND 01/31/2026 .375 10,000,000.00 9,897,265.63 97.129000 9,712,900.00 -184,365.63U.S. TREASURY BOND 01/31/2026 .375 10,000,000.00 9,894,140.63 97.129000 9,712,900.00 -181,240.63U.S. TREASURY BOND 02/15/2024 .125 25,000,000.00 24,930,664.06 98.965000 24,741,250.00 -189,414.06U.S. TREASURY BOND 04/30/2025 .375 15,000,000.00 14,956,640.63 98.121000 14,718,150.00 -238,490.63U.S. TREASURY BOND 02/15/2026 1.625 10,000,000.00 10,401,560.00 102.262000 10,226,200.00 -175,360.00U.S. TREASURY BOND 02/15/2026 1.625 10,000,000.00 10,466,015.63 102.262000 10,226,200.00 -239,815.63U.S. TREASURY BOND 07/31/2025 .250 25,000,000.00 24,537,109.38 97.352000 24,338,000.00 -199,109.38U.S. TREASURY BOND 02/28/2026 .500 20,000,000.00 19,910,508.60 97.570000 19,514,000.00 -396,508.60U.S. TREASURY BOND 02/28/2025 1.125 10,000,000.00 10,231,250.00 100.734000 10,073,400.00 -157,850.00U.S. TREASURY BOND 03/15/2024 .250 50,000,000.00 49,945,312.50 99.137000 49,568,500.00 -376,812.50U.S. TREASURY BOND 03/31/2025 .500 25,000,000.00 24,855,468.75 98.660000 24,665,000.00 -190,468.75U.S. TREASURY BOND 03/31/2023 .125 50,000,000.00 49,966,796.88 99.711000 49,855,500.00 -111,296.88U.S. TREASURY BOND 03/31/2025 .500 25,000,000.00 24,882,812.50 98.660000 24,665,000.00 -217,812.50U.S. TREASURY BOND 03/31/2023 .125 50,000,000.00 49,978,515.63 99.711000 49,855,500.00 -123,015.63U.S. TREASURY BOND 05/31/2022 .125 50,000,000.00 50,035,156.25 100.008000 50,004,000.00 -31,156.25U.S. TREASURY BOND 05/31/2022 .125 50,000,000.00 50,029,296.88 100.008000 50,004,000.00 -25,296.88U.S. TREASURY BOND 05/31/2022 .125 75,000,000.00 75,043,945.31 100.008000 75,006,000.00 -37,945.31U.S. TREASURY BOND 06/30/2026 .875 20,000,000.00 19,993,166.80 98.918000 19,783,600.00 -209,566.80U.S. TREASURY BOND 06/30/2026 .875 35,000,000.00 34,946,679.69 98.918000 34,621,300.00 -325,379.69U.S. TREASURY BOND 06/30/2022 .125 30,000,000.00 30,014,062.50 100.008000 30,002,400.00 -11,662.50U.S. TREASURY BOND 12/31/2025 .375 25,000,000.00 24,652,343.75 97.254000 24,313,500.00 -338,843.75U.S. TREASURY BOND 08/31/2026 .750 25,000,000.00 24,900,416.25 98.242000 24,560,500.00 -339,916.25U.S. TREASURY BOND 09/15/2024 .375 25,000,000.00 24,952,148.44 99.808594 24,952,148.44 0.00U.S. TREASURY BOND 03/31/2026 .750 25,000,000.00 25,039,062.50 98.551000 24,637,750.00 -401,312.50U.S. TREASURY BOND 09/15/2024 .375 25,000,000.00 24,953,125.00 99.812500 24,953,125.00 0.00U.S. TREASURY BOND 08/31/2026 .750 25,000,000.00 24,817,382.81 98.242000 24,560,500.00 -256,882.81U.S.. TREASURY BOND 09/30/2026 .875 20,000,000.00 19,895,833.60 99.479168 19,895,833.60 0.00U.S. TREASURY BOND 09/30/2025 .250 25,000,000.00 24,445,312.50 97.156000 24,289,000.00 -156,312.50U.S. TREASURY BOND 10/31/2023 1.625 20,000,000.00 20,536,718.75 102.137000 20,427,400.00 -109,318.75U.S. TREASURY BOND 07/31/2023 1.250 50,000,000.00 50,818,359.38 101.383000 50,691,500.00 -126,859.38U.S. TREASURY BOND 05/15/2023 .125 50,000,000.00 49,867,187.50 99.648000 49,824,000.00 -43,187.50U.S. TREASURY BOND 09/30/2025 .250 25,000,000.00 24,323,242.19 97.156000 24,289,000.00 -34,242.19U.S. TREASURY BOND 04/15/2023 .250 25,000,000.00 24,994,140.63 99.883000 24,970,750.00 -23,390.63U.S. TREASURY BOND 02/28/2023 2.625 25,000,000.00 25,803,710.94 102.887000 25,721,750.00 -81,960.94U.S. TREASURY BOND 04/30/2023 .125 25,000,000.00 24,930,664.06 99.664000 24,916,000.00 -14,664.06U.S. TREASURY BOND 05/31/2023 .125 25,000,000.00 24,917,968.75 99.609000 24,902,250.00 -15,718.75U.S. TREASURY BOND 03/31/2023 .125 25,000,000.00 24,941,406.25 99.711000 24,927,750.00 -13,656.25U.S. TREASURY BOND 10/15/2024 .625 25,000,000.00 24,905,273.44 99.621094 24,905,273.44 0.00U.S. TREASURY BOND 07/31/2023 .125 25,000,000.00 24,885,742.19 99.542969 24,885,742.19 0.00U.S. TREASURY BILL 01/31/2023 .125 50,000,000.00 49,916,015.63 99.813000 49,906,500.00 -9,515.63U.S. TREASURY BOND 02/28/2023 .125 50,000,000.00 49,882,812.50 99.770000 49,885,000.00 2,187.50U.S. TREASURY BOND 06/15/2023 .250 50,000,000.00 49,830,078.13 99.785000 49,892,500.00 62,421.87

.450 1,285,000,000.00 1,283,830,391.57 99.541056 1,279,102,572.67 -4,727,818.90

FHLMC 5YrNc9MoB 08/19/2025 .625 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.372000 9,837,200.00 -162,800.00.625 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.372000 9,837,200.00 -162,800.00

FHLMC 5YrNc1YrQ 05/27/2025 .750 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.329000 9,932,900.00 -67,100.003134GVRV2


91282CBM2912828ZL7

1420: FHLMC-Fxd-Q 30/360

912828S92912828ZP8

912828ZH691282CAM3

9128284A5

91282CBN0

3134GWLW4

4812CA538

48123X819

CASH

912828P46

912796R92912796M89

91282CCJ891282CCJ8

91282CCZ2

FGTXX

1065: CLTR-A/365-6

912796ZX0

912796D30

91282CBX8

912796J42

912796D30

91282CCD1

912796J75

912796P86

YieldTo Mat

ModifiedDuration

Years ToMaturity


CUSIP

.010 .003

91282CBU4

.003

.064 .003

.056 .003

.003

Fund: 1 POOL FUND

1060: MMKT ACCTS-A/365-6FRGXX

.003.025 .003 .003.025 .003

.003.026 .003 .003.025

.003 .003.059.003

.003 .003.026

.003 .003.064

.003

.064 .003 .003

.064 .003 .003

.120 .003 .003.003 .003.120

.003 .003.050 .003 .003.050

1.530 .000 .0031.515 .000 .003

.000 .003.000 .000 .000.069

.235 .236.055 .235 .236.057 .312 .312

.052

.312 .312.070 .542 .542.050 .235 .236

.032

.848 .849.053 .115 .115

912796M89912796Q69

.118

.050 .230 .230

.116 .848 .849

.095 .041 .041

.100 .041 .041

.100 .077 .077

.100 .063 .063

.104 .082 .082

.100 .057 .058

.100 .077 .077.080 .281 .281

1.751 2.919 3.003.586 4.121 4.173.593 4.121 4.173.219 2.203 2.211.445 3.390 3.416.799 4.053 4.214.670 4.056 4.214.675 3.637 3.668

4.249.539 3.184 3.249.287 2.282 2.290

.591 4.193

.647 3.297 3.334

.159 1.331 1.332

.619 3.297 3.334

.147 1.331 1.332

.054 .498 .499

.066 .498 .499

.065 .498 .499

.882 4.467 4.584

.906 4.466 4.584

.077 .583 .581

.700 4.035 4.088

.832 4.647 4.753

.439 2.772 2.795

.982 4.713 4.836

.715 4.252 4.334

.438 2.772 2.795

.334 1.646 1.666

.902 4.645 4.753

.815 3.800 3.836

.319 1.890 1.918

.293 1.455 1.455

.266 1.371 1.373

.950 3.798 3.836

.254 1.229 1.247

.307 1.414 1.414

.330 1.497 1.499

.288 1.330 1.332

.754 2.841 2.877

.384 1.662 1.666

.259 1.164 1.170

.301 1.247 1.247

.469 1.534 1.540.434 2.207 2.235

.625 3.673 3.721.625 3.673 3.721

.750 3.440 3.490

91282CBH391282CBH3

91282CCX7

91282CBU4

912828P46

91282CBQ3

912828ZR4

91282CBR1912828ZF0

91282CBT7

912828ZR4

912828ZF091282CBU4

91282CDB4

912828ZX1

912828ZR4

48123X819

91282CCN991282CBG5

912828ZU7

1080: MGD RATE-A/365-6

912828ZC7

91282CAB7

CASH

912796ZX0

912796P78912796A90

1425: FHLMC-Fxd-S 30/360

48123X819

48123X819

CLTR

TFDXX

MVRXX

GOFXXWFFXX

1170: MGD RATE-A/360

CASHCASH


912828YV6

912796P86

912796D30

912796F38912796F38

91282CCX791282CCW9

91282CAM3912828T91

91282CBC491282CCW9


50


Coupon ParValue

BookValue

MarketPrice

MarketValue

UnrealizedGain/Loss

YieldTo Mat

ModifiedDuration

Years ToMaturity


CUSIP

FHLMC 5YrNc1YrQ 05/28/2025 .730 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.259000 9,925,900.00 -74,100.00FHLMC 5YrNc1YrQ 05/28/2025 .730 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 99.259000 4,962,950.00 -37,050.00FHLMC 4YrNc2YrO 06/03/2024 .500 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.518000 9,951,800.00 -48,200.00FHLMC 4.9YrNc11MoB 05/28/2025 .750 15,000,000.00 14,992,500.00 99.259000 14,888,850.00 -103,650.00FHLMC 5YrNc2YrB 06/09/2025 .650 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 98.767000 14,815,050.00 -184,950.00FHLMC 4YrNc2YrO 07/01/2024 .500 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 99.298000 4,964,900.00 -35,100.00FHLMC 4YrNc1YrQ 07/15/2024 .570 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 100.071000 5,003,550.00 3,550.00FHLMC 3.5YrNc1.5YrB 01/24/2024 .420 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 99.831000 14,974,650.00 -25,350.00FHLMC 3.75YrNC9MB 04/29/2024 .500 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 99.672000 14,950,800.00 -49,200.00FHLMC 4.5YrNc2YrB 01/29/2025 .510 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 99.188000 14,878,200.00 -121,800.00FHLMC 4YrNc1.5YrQ 09/10/2024 .400 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.788000 9,878,800.00 -121,200.00FHLMC 4YrNc6MoQ 09/10/2024 .450 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.121000 9,912,100.00 -87,900.00FHLMC 4YrNc1.5YrQ 09/10/2024 .400 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.788000 9,878,800.00 -121,200.00FHLMC 4YrNc6MoQ 09/11/2024 .450 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.117000 9,911,700.00 -88,300.00FHLMC 5YrNc2YrQ 09/15/2025 .540 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 97.997000 9,799,700.00 -200,300.00FHLMC 5YrNc2YrQ 09/15/2025 .540 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 97.997000 14,699,550.00 -300,450.00FHLMC 4.75YrNc2YrQ 06/16/2025 .500 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 98.186000 4,909,300.00 -90,700.00FHLMC 4.5YrNc1YrQ 03/24/2025 .475 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 98.376000 14,756,400.00 -243,600.00FHLMC 3.75YrNc1YrQ 06/24/2024 .410 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.259000 9,925,900.00 -74,100.00FHLMC 5YrNC1.5YrB 03/28/2025 .500 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.433000 9,843,300.00 -156,700.00FHLMC 5YrNC6mOB 09/30/2025 .600 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 98.155000 4,907,750.00 -92,250.00FHLMC 5YrNC3MoB 10/27/2025 .625 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.191000 9,819,100.00 -180,900.00FHLMC 5YrNc1YrQ 10/28/2025 .600 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.072000 9,807,200.00 -192,800.00FHLMC 5YrNc2YrQ 10/28/2025 .550 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 97.922000 9,792,200.00 -207,800.00FHLMC 5Yr 09/23/2025 .375 10,000,000.00 9,941,100.00 97.412000 9,741,200.00 -199,900.00FHLMC 3Yr 11/06/2023 .250 10,000,000.00 9,991,000.00 99.464000 9,946,400.00 -44,600.00FHLMC 5YrNc1YrQ 11/12/2025 .600 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 97.673000 4,883,650.00 -116,350.00FHLMC 5YrNc1YrQ 11/12/2025 .600 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 97.673000 4,883,650.00 -116,350.00FHLMC 3YrNC2YrA 11/16/2023 .300 15,000,000.00 14,988,750.00 99.485000 14,922,750.00 -66,000.00FHLMC 5YrNC2YrA 11/17/2025 .560 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 98.040000 4,902,000.00 -98,000.00FHLMC 5YrNC2YrA 11/17/2025 .560 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 98.040000 4,902,000.00 -98,000.00FHLMC 2YrNc1YrQ 11/23/2022 .190 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.987000 9,998,700.00 -1,300.00FHLMC 3YrNc1YrQ 11/24/2023 .320 10,000,000.00 9,997,500.00 99.518000 9,951,800.00 -45,700.00FHLMC 2YrNc1YrQ 11/23/2022 .200 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.990000 9,999,000.00 -1,000.00FHLMC 2YrNc1YrQ 11/23/2022 .200 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.990000 9,999,000.00 -1,000.00FHLMC 3.5YrNc11MoQ 05/24/2024 .400 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.519000 9,951,900.00 -48,100.00FHLMC 3.5YrNc11MoQ 05/24/2024 .400 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.519000 9,951,900.00 -48,100.00FHLMC 2.5YrNC1YrB 06/01/2023 .250 10,000,000.00 9,997,500.00 99.881000 9,988,100.00 -9,400.00FHLMC 3YrNC11MoB 11/24/2023 .320 10,710,000.00 10,707,322.50 99.518000 10,658,377.80 -48,944.70FHLMC 2.5YrNC1YrB 06/01/2023 .250 10,000,000.00 9,995,000.00 99.881000 9,988,100.00 -6,900.00FHLMC 2.5YrNC1YrB 06/01/2023 .250 10,000,000.00 9,998,500.00 99.881000 9,988,100.00 -10,400.00FHLMC 2YrNc1YrQ 12/15/2022 .200 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.971000 9,997,100.00 -2,900.00FHLMC 5YrNC3MoB 12/30/2025 .700 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.615000 9,861,500.00 -138,500.00FHLMC 2.5YrNC1YrB 06/30/2023 .220 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.684000 9,968,400.00 -31,600.00

.455 445,710,000.00 445,609,172.50 99.072262 441,574,977.80 -4,034,194.70

FNMA 4.83Yr 10/05/2022 2.000 15,000,000.00 14,782,200.00 101.483000 15,222,450.00 440,250.00FNMA 5Yr 01/19/2023 2.375 10,000,000.00 9,944,100.00 102.377000 10,237,700.00 293,600.00FNMA 4.41Yr 09/12/2023 2.875 30,000,000.00 30,670,500.00 104.220000 31,266,000.00 595,500.00FNMA 4.83Yr 01/07/2025 1.625 10,000,000.00 10,247,300.00 102.169000 10,216,900.00 -30,400.00FNMA 5YrNc2YrQ 06/30/2025 .650 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 98.477000 4,923,850.00 -76,150.00FNMA 5YrNc1YrQ 06/30/2025 .740 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 98.784000 4,939,200.00 -60,800.00FNMA 5YrNc1YrQ 07/07/2025 .740 14,900,000.00 14,900,000.00 98.772000 14,717,028.00 -182,972.00FNMA 5YrNc1YrQ 07/15/2025 .730 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 98.736000 14,810,400.00 -189,600.00FNMA 5YrNc1YrB 07/29/2025 .700 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 98.623000 14,793,450.00 -206,550.00FNMA 5YrNc2YrB 07/29/2025 .600 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.281000 9,828,100.00 -171,900.00FNMA 5YrNc2YrB 07/29/2025 .600 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.281000 9,828,100.00 -171,900.00FNMA 5YrNc1YrB 08/04/2025 .700 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.623000 9,862,300.00 -137,700.00FNMA 5YrNc1YrB 08/04/2025 .700 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 98.623000 14,793,450.00 -206,550.00FNMA 4YrNc2YrB 08/12/2024 .410 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 98.977000 14,846,550.00 -153,450.00FNMA 3YrNC1.5YrB 08/17/2023 .310 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 99.794000 14,969,100.00 -30,900.00FNMA 5YrNc2Yr 08/19/2025 .550 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 98.034000 14,705,100.00 -294,900.00FNMA 5YrNc1YrQ 08/27/2025 .650 8,650,000.00 8,650,000.00 98.361000 8,508,226.50 -141,773.50FNMA 5YrNc1YrQ 08/27/2025 .625 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 98.275000 4,913,750.00 -86,250.00FNMA 3.5YrNc1.5YrQ 02/28/2024 .375 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.602000 9,960,200.00 -39,800.00FNMA 4.9YrNc11MoQ 08/26/2025 .600 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.190000 9,819,000.00 -181,000.00FNMA 3.9YrNc1.9YrQ 08/19/2024 .450 3,701,000.00 3,701,000.00 99.373000 3,677,794.73 -23,205.27FNMA 4YrNc2Yr 09/16/2024 .400 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.009000 9,900,900.00 -99,100.00FNMA 3.5YrNC2YrA 03/28/2024 .320 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.317000 9,931,700.00 -68,300.00FNMA 5YrNC1YrB 10/20/2025 .580 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.061000 9,806,100.00 -193,900.00FNMA 5YrNC2YrA 10/27/2025 .540 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 97.912000 9,791,200.00 -208,800.00FNMA 5YrNc2YrA 10/28/2025 .560 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 97.989000 4,899,450.00 -100,550.00FNMA 5YrNc1YrQ 10/29/2025 .600 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 98.124000 4,906,200.00 -93,800.00FNMA 5YrNc1YrQ 10/29/2025 .600 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.124000 9,812,400.00 -187,600.00FNMA 5YrNc1YrQ 10/29/2025 .600 10,000,000.00 9,998,000.00 98.124000 9,812,400.00 -185,600.00FNMA 5YrNc2YrA 11/04/2025 .550 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 97.953000 9,795,300.00 -204,700.00FNMA 4.9YrNc11MoQ 10/20/2025 .580 10,000,000.00 9,996,500.00 98.061000 9,806,100.00 -190,400.00FNMA 3.5YrNc2YrQ 05/03/2024 .350 3,500,000.00 3,499,300.00 99.455000 3,480,925.00 -18,375.00FNMA 5Yr 11/07/2025 .500 14,000,000.00 13,949,880.00 97.819000 13,694,660.00 -255,220.00FNMA 3YrNC2YrB 11/16/2023 .300 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.414000 9,941,400.00 -58,600.00FNMA 3.5YrNc2YrQ 05/17/2024 .350 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.424000 9,942,400.00 -57,600.00FNMA 3.5YrNc2YrQ 05/17/2024 .350 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.424000 9,942,400.00 -57,600.00FNMA 5YrNc2YrA 11/17/2025 .560 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.040000 9,804,000.00 -196,000.00FNMA 4YrNC2YrB 11/18/2024 .420 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.615000 9,861,500.00 -138,500.00FNMA 5YrNC2YrA 11/18/2025 .650 20,000,000.00 20,000,000.00 98.303000 19,660,600.00 -339,400.00FNMA 3.25YrNc2YrA 02/23/2024 .350 20,000,000.00 20,000,000.00 99.519000 19,903,800.00 -96,200.00FNMA 3.75YrNc2YrA 08/23/2024 .420 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 99.345000 14,901,750.00 -98,250.00FNMA 5YrNc2YrA 11/25/2025 .600 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 98.111000 14,716,650.00 -283,350.00FNMA 2.9YrNc2YrQ 11/16/2023 .310 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 99.755000 4,987,750.00 -12,250.00FNMA 4.5YrNc1.5YrB 06/24/2025 .500 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 97.985000 9,798,500.00 -201,500.00

.780 489,751,000.00 490,338,780.00 99.221183 485,936,734.23 -4,402,045.77

FNMA 2Yr 03/16/2022 .270 25,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 100.060000 25,015,000.00 15,000.00FNMA 2Yr 04/07/2022 .400 25,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 100.117000 25,029,250.00 29,250.00FNMA 2Yr 04/15/2022 .440 25,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 100.144000 25,036,000.00 36,000.00

.370 75,000,000.00 75,000,000.00 100.107000 75,080,250.00 80,250.00

3134GVWM63134GVYX0

1525: FNMA-Fxd-S 30/360

3135G06A6

3136G4XK4

3135GA3N9

1576: FNMA-Var-SOFR-Q A/360

3135G03J0

3134GXCA0

3134GWP26

3134GWL38

3136G4F323136G4D75

3136G42F9

3134GVWM6

3136G45C3

3135GA2N0

3135GA2P53135G06G3

3134GWAL0

3134GWT22

3134GW3Z7

3134GWTG1

3134GWN443134GWL38

3134GWP91

3134GVE95

3134GWCM6

3134GWET9

3136G43H4

3136G4X40

3134GWR32

3136G4XR9

3136G4K513136G4H63

3134GW3X2

3134GXGQ1

3134GXBM5

3134GWL79

3134GXCF93134GXCF9

3135GA3Z2

3135GA2Z3

3135G06C2

3135GA2Z3

3136G4Z97

3136G46S7

3136G43W13135G06A6

3136G4J38

3135GA2Z3

3134GXBM5

.730 3.444 3.493

.730 3.444 3.493

.500 2.483 2.510

.760 3.442 3.493

.650 3.469 3.526

.500 2.561 2.586

.570 2.596 2.625

.420 2.135 2.151

.500 2.395 2.414

.510 3.129 3.167

.400 2.757 2.781

.450 2.755 2.7813134GWL79 .400 2.757 2.7813134GWN85

.450 2.758 2.784

.540 3.744 3.795

.540 3.744 3.795

.500 3.501 3.545

.475 3.284 3.315

.410 2.546 2.567

.500 3.293 3.326

.600 3.780 3.836

.625 3.853 3.910

.600 3.858 3.912

.550 3.862 3.9123137EAEX3 .497 3.778 3.8163134GW3Y0

.280 1.927 1.934

.600 3.897 3.953

.600 3.897 3.953

.325 1.953 1.962

.560 3.914 3.967

.560 3.914 3.967

.190 .979 .981

.328 1.975 1.984.979 .981

.200 .979 .981

.400 2.468 2.482

.200

.400 2.468 2.482

.260 1.497 1.501

.328 1.975 1.9841.501

.256 1.497 1.5011.041

.270 1.497

.700 4.007 4.085

.200 1.039

1.578 1.581.460 2.718 2.747.220

2.333 1.721 1.784

2.322 .833 .8472.495 1.105 1.137

1.094 3.004 3.107.650 3.527 3.584.740 3.519 3.584.740 3.538 3.603.730 3.561 3.625.700 3.603 3.663.600 3.611 3.663.600 3.611 3.663

3.742

.700 3.617 3.679

3.721.310 1.707

.700 3.617 3.679

1.712

2.236 2.247.600 3.686 3.740

3.742.375

.650 3.685

.410 2.679 2.701

.550 3.671

3.860

.625 3.687

.450 2.697

3.915

.320 2.316 2.326

3.9103.838 3.890

.540

.560 3.861

2.721.400 2.774 2.797

.587 3.837 3.890

.600

.580

3.8613.861

.550 3.879 3.9323.9153.861

3.912

.600 3.915

.350 2.451 2.463

.356 2.412 2.425

.604

.573 3.890 3.940

.300 1.954 1.962

.350 2.451 2.463

.420 2.945 2.970

.560 3.914 3.967

.650 3.909 3.9702.218 2.233

.420 2.709 2.732

.350

.600 3.933 3.989

.310 1.953 1.962

.500 3.523 3.567.758 3.035 3.078

.270 .293 .290

.400 .352 .351

.440 .374 .373.370 .340 .338

3134GXEA8

3136G4B773136G4B77

3136G4C27

3136G4Q97

3136G4XZ1

3134GXHL13134GXHH0

3136G4YU1

3135G0T783135G0T94

3135G06E8

3135G06F53135GAAZ4

3136G4P31

3134GXEA8

3134GXEX8

3134GVB31

3134GV3A43134GV5R5

3136G46N83135G06C2

3135GA4P3

3137EAEZ8

3134GXBL7

3135GA3C33135GA3C3

3134GXDG63134GXCA0

3134GXEX83134GXEX8

3135G0U433135G0X24

3135GA5A53135GA4R9

3135G02K83135G03B7

1710: FHLB-Fxd-M 30/360


51


Coupon ParValue

BookValue

MarketPrice

MarketValue

UnrealizedGain/Loss

YieldTo Mat

ModifiedDuration

Years ToMaturity


CUSIP


1.024 90,000,000.00 90,000,000.00 99.227556 89,304,800.00 -695,200.00

FHLB 4.5 Yr 06/10/2022 2.125 7,975,000.00 7,955,620.75 101.066000 8,060,013.50 104,392.75FHLB 4.9Yr 03/10/2023 2.125 11,750,000.00 11,432,397.50 102.253000 12,014,727.50 582,330.00FHLB 2.91Yr 03/11/2022 2.500 30,000,000.00 30,158,100.00 100.681000 30,204,300.00 46,200.00FHLB 4.25YrNc3MoA 12/09/2024 .500 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.835000 9,883,500.00 -116,500.00FHLB 2 Yr 10/21/2022 .125 10,000,000.00 9,989,900.00 99.940000 9,994,000.00 4,100.00FHLB 3YrNc1YrA 12/22/2023 .190 15,000,000.00 14,979,900.00 99.431000 14,914,650.00 -65,250.00FHLB 3YrNc6MoB 12/28/2023 .250 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.528000 9,952,800.00 -47,200.00FHLB 3.25YrNc6MoA 03/28/2024 .270 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 99.072000 14,860,800.00 -139,200.00FHLB 3.5YrNc1YrB 06/28/2024 .260 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 99.105000 14,865,750.00 -134,250.00FHLB 3.5YrNc1YrB 06/28/2024 .260 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.105000 9,910,500.00 -89,500.00FHLB 3.25YrNc6MoA 03/28/2024 .270 15,000,000.00 14,995,500.00 99.072000 14,860,800.00 -134,700.00FHLB 5YrNc6MoQ 02/18/2026 .600 5,000,000.00 4,996,250.00 97.933000 4,896,650.00 -99,600.00FHLB 5YrNc1YrQ 02/23/2026 .580 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.074000 9,807,400.00 -192,600.00FHLB 4.25Yr1YrQ 05/23/2025 .500 14,750,000.00 14,750,000.00 97.972000 14,450,870.00 -299,130.00FHLB 4.5YrNc1YrQ 08/25/2025 .550 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 97.949000 4,897,450.00 -102,550.00FHLB 5YrNc1YrA 02/25/2026 .580 6,000,000.00 6,000,000.00 98.138000 5,888,280.00 -111,720.00FHLB 5YrNc3MoQ 02/25/2026 .790 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 99.034000 14,855,100.00 -144,900.00FHLB 5YrNc3MoQ 02/25/2026 .790 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.034000 9,903,400.00 -96,600.00FHLB 3.75YrNc6MoB 11/26/2024 .400 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 98.566000 4,928,300.00 -71,700.00FHLB 5YrNc3MoQ 02/26/2026 .850 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.881000 9,888,100.00 -111,900.00FHLB 5YrNc1YrQ 03/16/2026 .700 25,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 98.391000 24,597,750.00 -402,250.00FHLB 5YrNc1YrA 03/18/2026 .750 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.629000 9,862,900.00 -137,100.00FHLB 4.25YrNc1YrQ 06/18/2025 .530 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.039000 9,803,900.00 -196,100.00FHLB 5YrNc1YrA 03/18/2026 .750 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.629000 9,862,900.00 -137,100.00FHLB 5YrNc3MoQ 03/18/2026 .790 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 98.656000 14,798,400.00 -201,600.00FHLB 5YrNc1YrA 03/18/2026 .750 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.629000 9,862,900.00 -137,100.00FHLB 5YrNc1MoM 03/23/2026 1.000 14,625,000.00 14,625,000.00 98.719000 14,437,653.75 -187,346.25FHLB 5YrNc1MoM 03/23/2026 1.000 9,750,000.00 9,750,000.00 98.719000 9,625,102.50 -124,897.50FHLB 5YrNc1MoM 03/23/2026 1.000 14,625,000.00 14,625,000.00 98.719000 14,437,653.75 -187,346.25FHLB 5YrNc1MoM 03/23/2026 1.000 8,921,250.00 8,914,559.06 98.719000 8,806,968.79 -107,590.27FHLB 5YrNc1MoM 03/23/2026 1.000 9,750,000.00 9,750,000.00 98.719000 9,625,102.50 -124,897.50FHLB 5YrNc1MoM 03/23/2026 1.000 19,500,000.00 19,500,000.00 98.719000 19,250,205.00 -249,795.00FHLB 5YrNc1MoM 03/23/2026 1.000 19,500,000.00 19,500,000.00 98.719000 19,250,205.00 -249,795.00FHLB 5YrNc1MoM 03/23/2026 1.000 9,750,000.00 9,750,000.00 98.719000 9,625,102.50 -124,897.50FHLB 4YrNc6MoB 03/24/2025 .700 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.994000 9,899,400.00 -100,600.00FHLB 4YrNc1YrB 03/25/2025 .625 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.765000 9,876,500.00 -123,500.00FHLB 4YrNc1YrB 03/25/2025 .625 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.765000 9,876,500.00 -123,500.00FHLB 4YrNc1YrB 03/25/2025 .625 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.765000 9,876,500.00 -123,500.00FHLB 4YrNc3MoB 03/17/2025 .650 15,000,000.00 14,977,500.00 98.748000 14,812,200.00 -165,300.00FHLB 3.5YrNc6MoQ 09/30/2024 .510 25,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 98.568000 24,642,000.00 -358,000.00FHLB 4.25YrNc6MoQ 06/30/2025 .750 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.773000 9,877,300.00 -122,700.00FHLB 3YrNC3MB 04/08/2024 .375 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.510000 9,951,000.00 -49,000.00FHLB 4YrNC6MoB 04/08/2025 .720 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 99.061000 14,859,150.00 -140,850.00FHLB 3.91YrNC2MoB 03/17/2025 .650 25,000,000.00 24,950,000.00 98.748000 24,687,000.00 -263,000.00FHLB 9Mo 02/01/2022 .045 25,000,000.00 24,998,865.00 100.001000 25,000,250.00 1,385.00FHLB 5YrNc6MoQ 05/26/2026 1.050 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 99.193000 14,878,950.00 -121,050.00FHLB 5YrNc6MoQ 05/26/2026 1.000 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.042000 9,904,200.00 -95,800.00FHLB 5YrNc6MoQ 05/26/2026 1.030 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 99.144000 4,957,200.00 -42,800.00FHLB 5YrNC1YrB 06/10/2026 1.000 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 99.040000 4,952,000.00 -48,000.00FHLB 5YrNc3MOQ 07/22/2026 1.000 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 98.930000 14,839,500.00 -160,500.00FHLB 5YrNc3MoQ 07/27/2026 1.000 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 98.911000 14,836,650.00 -163,350.00FHLB 5YrNc3MoQ 07/27/2026 1.000 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.911000 9,891,100.00 -108,900.00FHLB 5YrNc3MoA 08/05/2026 1.000 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.225000 9,922,500.00 -77,500.00FHLB 5YrNC1MoM 08/17/2026 1.000 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.080000 9,908,000.00 -92,000.00FHLB 5YrNC1MoM 08/20/2026 1.100 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.145000 9,914,500.00 -85,500.00FHLB 5YrNc6MoQ 08/25/2026 1.000 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.895000 9,889,500.00 -110,500.00FHLB 5YrNc3MoM 08/26/2026 1.000 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 99.256000 14,888,400.00 -111,600.00FHLB 5YrNc3MoQ 08/26/2026 1.000 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 100.000000 15,000,000.00 0.00FHLB 3.25YrNc3MoQ 12/17/2024 .550 10,000,000.00 9,999,000.00 99.281000 9,928,100.00 -70,900.00FHLB 3YrNc3MoQ 09/27/2024 .500 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 100.000000 10,000,000.00 0.00FHLB 5YrNc1Mo 09/28/2026 1.040 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 100.000000 15,000,000.00 0.00FHLB 3YrNc3MoQ 09/30/2024 .570 20,000,000.00 19,988,000.00 99.940000 19,988,000.00 0.00FHLB 5YrNc3MoQ 09/30/2026 1.000 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.738000 9,873,800.00 -126,200.00

.810 791,896,250.00 791,585,592.31 99.105702 784,814,334.79 -6,771,257.52


.057 92,000,000.00 91,962,385.55 99.980685 91,982,230.00 19,844.45

FFCB 5Yr 04/11/2023 2.700 10,000,000.00 9,990,300.00 103.196000 10,319,600.00 329,300.00FFCB 5Yr 10/02/2023 3.050 10,000,000.00 9,979,300.00 104.623000 10,462,300.00 483,000.00FFCB 3Yr 09/06/2022 1.500 14,435,000.00 14,422,874.60 101.012000 14,581,082.20 158,207.60FFCB 4.9Yr 09/17/2024 1.600 6,128,000.00 6,107,471.20 102.111000 6,257,362.08 149,890.88FFCB 4.9Yr 09/10/2024 2.080 2,064,000.00 2,101,585.44 103.437000 2,134,939.68 33,354.24FFCB 4YrNc2YrA 02/28/2024 1.550 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 100.335000 5,016,750.00 16,750.00FFCB 5YrNc2YrA 06/10/2025 .680 5,025,000.00 5,025,000.00 98.260000 4,937,565.00 -87,435.00FFCB 3YrNc1YrA 08/10/2023 .320 15,945,000.00 15,945,000.00 99.783000 15,910,399.35 -34,600.65FFCB 2.5YrNc3MoA 03/15/2023 .220 10,000,000.00 9,992,500.00 99.916000 9,991,600.00 -900.00FFCB 3YrNC2YrA 10/20/2023 .270 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.735000 9,973,500.00 -26,500.00FFCB 3YrNc1YrA 11/30/2023 .310 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.269000 9,926,900.00 -73,100.00FFCB 3YrNc2YrA 12/08/2023 .280 9,931,000.00 9,935,667.57 99.659000 9,897,135.29 -38,532.28FFCB 2.5YrNc6MoA 06/15/2023 .200 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 99.778000 14,966,700.00 -33,300.00FFCB 2YrNc1YrA 12/15/2022 .160 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.919000 9,991,900.00 -8,100.00FFCB 2YrNc1YrA 12/15/2022 .160 8,245,000.00 8,245,000.00 99.919000 8,238,321.55 -6,678.45FFCB 3YrNc1YrA 12/21/2023 .210 10,000,000.00 9,992,500.00 99.370000 9,937,000.00 -55,500.00FFCB 2.75YrNc6MoA 09/22/2023 .190 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.639000 9,963,900.00 -36,100.00FFCB 4YrNc6MoA 12/23/2024 .320 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 98.277000 4,913,850.00 -86,150.00

3130AMS52

1725: FHLB-Fxd-S 30/360

313378WG23130AK3T1

3130APAD7

3130ALGJ7

3130ALEH3

3130AKLB0

3133EMJQ63133EMKG6

3133EMKH43133EMKW1

3130ALGJ7

3130ALGJ7


3130AKKP0

3130ALGJ7

3130AMMZ2

3130AP5M3

3130ALDX9

3130AKLB0

3130ANAJ9

3130AMT69

3130AKDH6

3130ALTH7

3130ALH56

3130ALGJ7

3130ALFN9

3130ALU93

3130ALH563130ALFW9

3133EMHL9

313313TD0

3130ALGJ7

3133EL3E2

3130ANAJ9

3130ALF25

3130AKKF2

313379Q69

3130ALKL7

3130AKL79

.819

.070

3133EJKN83133EJD48

1.529

313313WR5

1925: FFCB-Fxd-S 30/360

3133EKM45

3.042 3.066

4.299.750

4.299

1.000 4.312

4.2994.213

.320

4.172

.850 4.239 4.3181.070 4.460 4.5731.130 4.516 4.6381.000 4.417 4.5231.050 4.462 4.5731.020 4.489 4.6001.040 4.712 4.830

1.024 4.482 4.591

.5262.716 1.245 1.2742.182 .517

.277.500 2.991 3.027

2.308 .273

.890.235 2.054 2.060.176 .891

2.578.260 2.565 2.578

2.077.270 2.318 2.326.250 2.069

2.318 2.326.615 4.150 4.222.279

.260 2.565

.580 4.167 4.236

4.241

.500 3.446 3.479

.550 3.688 3.7374.241

.790 4.150

.400

.790 4.150 4.241

.580

2.968 2.992

4.217.850

4.2934.146 4.244

.7503.504

.700

3.5514.218

4.218.530

.750

4.312

4.218 4.299.790

1.000 4.204 4.3121.000 4.204

4.204

4.204 4.3121.000 4.204 4.3121.000 4.204 4.312

1.015

4.204 4.3121.000 4.204 4.312

3.269 3.315

1.000

3.277 3.318.700

3.277 3.318.625 3.277 3.318.625.625

3.252 3.296.510 2.807 2.836.750 3.518 3.584

.688

2.356.720 3.306 3.356.702 3.252 3.296

.375 2.342

.1731.050 4.373 4.4881.000 4.378 4.488

.051 .172

4.4881.000 4.395 4.5291.000 4.511 4.644

1.030 4.375

4.525 4.6581.000 4.525 4.6581.000

4.547 4.6821.000 4.581 4.7151.100 4.576 4.723

1.000

4.603 4.7371.000 4.605 4.7401.000 4.605 4.740

1.000

3.010 3.049.500 2.799 2.827

1.040 4.689 4.830

.553

2.804 2.8361.000 4.699

.060 .153 .153

4.8363.373

.590

1.362

3.442

.265

.050 .213 .214.444

.7671.672 2.716 2.800

1.693

3.095 1.767 1.8382.721

1.288

1.688 2.680 2.7811.550 2.195 2.247

.2501.8882.000

.264 2.013

.680 3.469 3.529

2.022

.320 1.687

1.540

.310 1.992

1.041.200 1.537

1.811.190

.160 1.040 1.041

.160 1.040

.235 2.051 2.0581.807

.270 1.882

.443.057 .264

1.288

.757

1.326

3130ANBX7

3130ALKF03130ALKF0

3130ALWL43130ALLP7

3130ALHG2

3130AMJN3

3130AMEN8

3130ALNK6

3130ALTJ3

3130ALEM2

3130ALHZ0

3130ALEM2

3130AL6K5

313382AX1

3130ALGR9

3133EMLE03133EMLP5

3130ANMH0

3130ANSC5

3130APBH7

3133ELH80

3130ANPF1

313313SF6

3130ANE48

3133EL7E83133EMDM1

3133EMKH4

3130AKKF2

3130ANTS9

3130ANFD7

3130ALBX1

3130AMKB73130AMME9

3130AL2G8

3133EKQA73133ELNJ9

3130ANYN4

3133EKP75

3130AN3R9

3130AMWT53130AN3B4

3130ANRB83130ANX88

3130ALLP7

3130ALN34

3130ALGJ73130ALGJ7


52


Coupon ParValue

BookValue

MarketPrice

MarketValue

UnrealizedGain/Loss

YieldTo Mat

ModifiedDuration

Years ToMaturity


CUSIP

FFCB 3YrNC1YrA 12/21/2023 .210 20,000,000.00 19,985,000.00 99.370000 19,874,000.00 -111,000.00FFCB 4YrNc6MoA 12/23/2024 .320 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 98.277000 14,741,550.00 -258,450.00FFCB 5YrNc6MoA 12/23/2025 .500 12,430,000.00 12,426,271.00 97.015000 12,058,964.50 -367,306.50FFCB 3.25YrNc6MoA 03/28/2024 .270 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.072000 9,907,200.00 -92,800.00FFCB 4YrNc6MoA 12/23/2024 .320 10,000,000.00 9,992,500.00 98.277000 9,827,700.00 -164,800.00FFCB 1.75YrNc6MoA 09/22/2022 .120 15,000,000.00 14,991,000.00 99.931000 14,989,650.00 -1,350.00FFCB 3YrNC1YrA 12/28/2023 .210 15,000,000.00 14,988,750.00 99.188000 14,878,200.00 -110,550.00FFCB 3.9YrNc1.9YrA 12/28/2023 .210 10,000,000.00 9,990,000.00 99.188000 9,918,800.00 -71,200.00FFCB 2Yr 01/12/2023 .120 25,000,000.00 24,997,500.00 99.875000 24,968,750.00 -28,750.00FFCB 4rNC1YrA 03/03/2025 .480 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 98.366000 4,918,300.00 -81,700.00FFCB 4YrNC1YrA 03/03/2025 .480 10,000,000.00 9,987,500.00 98.366000 9,836,600.00 -150,900.00FFCB 3Yr 03/18/2024 .300 25,000,000.00 24,994,675.00 99.201000 24,800,250.00 -194,425.00FHLB 4YrNc1YrA 04/01/2025 .710 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.896000 9,889,600.00 -110,400.00FFCB 4YrNc1YrA 04/01/2025 .710 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.896000 9,889,600.00 -110,400.00FFCB 3YrNC1YrA 04/05/2024 .330 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.038000 9,903,800.00 -96,200.00FFCB 1Yr 05/17/2022 .060 50,000,000.00 49,998,575.00 99.971000 49,985,500.00 -13,075.00FFCB 5YrNc2YrA 05/18/2026 .900 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 98.932000 4,946,600.00 -53,400.00FFCB 5YrNc6MoA 07/13/2026 .990 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 100.000000 10,000,000.00 0.00FFCB 5YrNc6MoA 07/13/2026 .990 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 100.000000 10,000,000.00 0.00FFCB 4.9YrNC11YrA 10/20/2026 1.140 10,000,000.00 9,947,500.00 99.475000 9,947,500.00 0.00FFCB 4.91YrNC11MOA 10/20/2026 1.140 10,000,000.00 9,905,000.00 99.050000 9,905,000.00 0.00FFCB 5YrNC1YrA 11/23/2026 1.430 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 100.021000 10,002,100.00 2,100.00FFCB 1.5Yr 05/23/2023 .375 50,000,000.00 49,939,500.00 99.879000 49,939,500.00 0.00

.531 524,203,000.00 523,880,969.81 99.684658 522,549,969.65 -1,331,000.16

FFCB 2.3Yr 02/21/2023 .161 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 100.101000 15,015,150.00 15,150.00.161 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 100.101000 15,015,150.00 15,150.00

FFCB 3Yr 11/07/2022 .360 25,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 100.268000 25,067,000.00 67,000.00FFCB 3Yr 11/07/2022 .360 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 100.268000 15,040,200.00 40,200.00FFCB 3Yr 11/07/2022 .360 25,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 100.268000 25,067,000.00 67,000.00FFCB 3Yr 12/09/2022 .370 9,000,000.00 9,000,000.00 100.307000 9,027,630.00 27,630.00FFCB 3Yr 12/09/2022 .370 24,000,000.00 24,000,000.00 100.307000 24,073,680.00 73,680.00FFCB 3Yr 12/09/2022 .370 24,000,000.00 24,000,000.00 100.307000 24,073,680.00 73,680.00FFCB 3Yr 12/09/2022 .370 24,000,000.00 24,000,000.00 100.307000 24,073,680.00 73,680.00FFCB 3Yr 12/09/2022 .370 14,000,000.00 14,000,000.00 100.307000 14,042,980.00 42,980.00FFCB 3Yr 12/09/2022 .370 24,000,000.00 24,000,000.00 100.307000 24,073,680.00 73,680.00

.366 184,000,000.00 184,000,000.00 100.293223 184,539,530.00 539,530.00

FAMCA 4.9Yr 06/30/2023 2.850 10,000,000.00 9,947,900.00 103.760000 10,376,000.00 428,100.002.850 10,000,000.00 9,947,900.00 103.760000 10,376,000.00 428,100.00

STATE OF HAWAII 01/01/2022 2.770 3,500,000.00 3,500,000.00 100.000000 3,500,000.00 0.00SIER JT COM GO 08/01/2024 .354 720,000.00 720,000.00 100.000000 720,000.00 0.00SIER JT COM GO 08/01/2024 .344 500,000.00 500,000.00 100.000000 500,000.00 0.00SIER JT COM GO 08/01/2023 .229 260,000.00 260,000.00 100.000000 260,000.00 0.00SIER JT COM GO 08/01/2022 .179 205,000.00 205,000.00 100.000000 205,000.00 0.00SIER JT COM GO 08/01/2022 .179 260,000.00 260,000.00 100.000000 260,000.00 0.00SANTA CLARA USD GO 07/01/2022 .160 8,770,000.00 8,770,000.00 100.000000 8,770,000.00 0.00SANTA CLARA USD GO 07/01/2023 .210 2,870,000.00 2,870,000.00 100.000000 2,870,000.00 0.00SAN DIEGUITO USD GO 08/01/2022 .175 425,000.00 425,000.00 100.000000 425,000.00 0.00SAN DIEGUITO USD GO 08/01/2023 .275 425,000.00 425,000.00 100.000000 425,000.00 0.00SAN DIEGUITO USD GO 08/01/2023 .275 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 100.000000 1,000,000.00 0.00SAN DIEGUITO USD GO 08/01/2022 .175 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 100.000000 1,000,000.00 0.00CITY CNT SAN FRANSISCO GO 06/15/2022 .250 29,250,000.00 29,277,495.00 100.094000 29,277,495.00 0.00OCESCD UNS GO 08/01/2022 .290 125,000.00 125,000.00 100.000000 125,000.00 0.00STATE OF WASHINGTON GO 08/01/2024 .470 14,995,000.00 14,995,000.00 100.000000 14,995,000.00 0.00SANTA MONICA-MALIBU USD GO 08/01/2022 .142 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 100.000000 1,000,000.00 0.00

SANTA MONICA-MALIBU USD GO 08/01/2025 .669 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 100.000000 1,000,000.00 0.00


MARIN CMNTY CLG GO 08/01/2025 .763 1,065,000.00 1,065,000.00 100.000000 1,065,000.00 0.00MARIN CMNTY CLG GO 08/01/2022 .176 990,000.00 990,000.00 100.000000 990,000.00 0.00SAN MATEO USD GO 09/01/2023 .256 500,000.00 500,000.00 100.000000 500,000.00 0.00SAN MATEO USD GO 09/01/2022 .166 500,000.00 500,000.00 100.000000 500,000.00 0.00

HAWAII STATE 10/01/2022 .247 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 100.000000 10,000,000.00 0.00HAWAII STATE 10/01/2023 .422 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 100.000000 10,000,000.00 0.00HAWAII STATE 10/01/2024 .713 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 100.000000 10,000,000.00 0.00HAWAII STATE 10/01/2025 2.750 12,775,000.00 13,625,815.00 106.660000 13,625,815.00 0.00HAWAII STATE 10/01/2022 .247 2,305,000.00 2,305,000.00 100.000000 2,305,000.00 0.00HAWAII STATE 10/01/2023 .422 3,260,000.00 3,260,000.00 100.000000 3,260,000.00 0.00HAWAII STATE 10/01/2024 .713 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00 100.000000 2,500,000.00 0.00HAWAII STATE 10/01/2025 1.033 3,660,000.00 3,660,000.00 100.000000 3,660,000.00 0.00HAWAII STATE 02/01/2022 .247 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 100.000000 5,000,000.00 0.00HAWAII STATE 08/01/2022 .247 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 100.000000 10,000,000.00 0.00HAWAII STATE 08/01/2023 .422 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 100.000000 15,000,000.00 0.00HAWAII STATE 08/01/2024 .713 9,000,000.00 9,000,000.00 100.000000 9,000,000.00 0.00HAWAII STATE 08/01/2025 1.033 6,250,000.00 6,250,000.00 100.000000 6,250,000.00 0.00SAN DIEGO USD GO 01/01/2022 .160 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00 100.000000 2,500,000.00 0.00SAN DIEGO USD GO 01/01/2022 .160 5,120,000.00 5,120,000.00 100.000000 5,120,000.00 0.00BEAUMONT USD GO 08/01/2025 1.109 500,000.00 500,000.00 100.000000 500,000.00 0.00BEAUMONT USD GO 08/01/2022 .278 225,000.00 225,000.00 100.000000 225,000.00 0.00BEAUMONT USD GO 08/01/2024 .690 275,000.00 275,000.00 100.000000 275,000.00 0.00LIVERMORE VLY USD GO 12/01/2021 .120 2,250,000.00 2,250,000.00 100.000000 2,250,000.00 0.00SAN RAMON VLY USD GO 08/01/2022 .202 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 100.000000 1,000,000.00 0.00SAN RAMON VLY USD GO 08/01/2025 .967 4,505,000.00 4,505,000.00 100.000000 4,505,000.00 0.00LOS ANGELES CA USD GO 01/01/2022 3.000 4,000,000.00 4,015,880.00 100.397000 4,015,880.00 0.00SUNNYVALE USD GO 01/01/2022 .230 1,515,000.00 1,515,000.00 100.000000 1,515,000.00 0.00TEXTAS STATE G.O. 10/01/2024 .794 5,810,000.00 5,810,000.00 100.000000 5,810,000.00 0.00TEXTAS STATE G.O. 10/01/2023 .508 4,745,000.00 4,745,000.00 100.000000 4,745,000.00 0.00

.668 202,555,000.00 203,449,190.00 100.441455 203,449,190.00 0.00


.250 80,000,000.00 80,085,900.00 100.107375 80,085,900.00 0.003020: COMMERCIAL PAPER

882724XJ1

2360: MUNIS-A 30/360

923035BS7923035BS7

3133EK6V3

1950: FMAC-Fxd-S 30/360

826239GH2826239FY6

882724XK8

797356EJ7

538310P23

419792F68

419792D29

93974ETF3802498YW9

826239FW08014952N1

797508JS8797508JT6

79773KGV0675383TG8

3133ELCX0

2350: MUNIS-S 30/360

3132X03B5

3133ELCX03133ELCX0

419792F76

3130AKKF23133EMLP5

797356DV1

799017XT0

3133ELCX0

3133EMLT73133EMLT7

3133EMSC73133EMTW23133EMUP5

867578VS2

7994082E87994082B4

3133EK6V3

3133EMML33133EMSC7

419792D37

3133EMLF7

1.836

.160

1.684 1.712

.582 .584

.582 .584.582 .584

.582 .584

.088

.690

3.671

1.836

1.033

2.800

2.798 2.838

2.838

.713

3.747 3.838.172

3.838.247 .835 .836

.668

.669 .668

1.033

.256

.247 .835 .836

3133EK6V3

3133ENBK5

3133EMLR1

.669 3.613

3.606

1.7531.747

3.671

3.671.763

.396

.176

.668

2.671

.290 .668

.470

.142 .669

2.650

.6682.646

.506

3.066.810 .811

.235 2.051 2.058

.320

.541.141 .540

2.671

3.042 3.066

2.077

4.066.270 2.318 2.326

.235 2.070 2.077

.339 3.042

.125 1.115 1.118

.480 3.226 3.258

2.348

.710

3.258.307 2.289 2.299

.460.900.990 4.488

3.337

4.367 4.466

.710 3.288 3.337

4.8901.340 4.731

4.619.990 4.488 4.619

1.249 4.733

1.477.557 2.120 2.149.457

4.8901.430 4.790 4.984

1.474

.161 1.223 1.227.161 1.223 1.227

.937.360 .928 .937

.360 .928 .937

.360

1.025.370 1.012 1.025

1.012

1.012

1.012

1.025.370 1.012 1.025.370

2.6522.770 .086 .088

1.025

.366 .982 .9941.012 1.025

2.671.344 2.652 2.671

.668

.229 1.668.668.668

1.664

1.584.668

.210.668

.585 .5841.581

.175

.160

1.581

.668 .668.275 1.663

1.6681.668

1.663.275

.175

2.335

2.9641.519 1.581

1.519

.244

4.009

.063 .460

.330

.370

3.642

1.826

.155

.668

.512 3.225

3.288

2.070

.752

.928

.173

.422

2.800

1.033.247

.713

.422

.6681.661

.247

.160.088

2.639

1.6682.637 2.6713.587 3.671.088 .088

3.594.967

.088

.794

.2023.671

3.582.668 .668.278

2.671.003 .003.669 .668

.136

.088

.141

1.825

.088.088

.131

.197

.140

.230

.508

1.109

.120

074437HB3

544647EC0

.179

2.964

8014952P6

419792YL4

.179

.354

.370

.3703133ELCX0

1.826 1.8362.838

.753

1935: FFCB-Var-SOFR-M A/360

3133EMUP5

.491

.166

.713419792A63 .422419792A55

797508HV3

419792F50

074437GY4

56781RKQ9

3133ELCX0

923035BS7

3133EMVD13133EMZJ43133EMZS4

3133EMKW13133EMLP5

826239GF6

419792D45

802498YZ2

799017XS2

802498YY5

56781RKT3

3133EMQ62

3133ENEW6

3133EMQ62

3133ENBK53133ENEM8

1936: FFCB-Var-SOFR-Q A/360

3133EM7M8

419792A89419792C95

419792F84419792F92

074437HA5

419792A71

797508HU5

826239FX8


53


Coupon ParValue

BookValue

MarketPrice

MarketValue

UnrealizedGain/Loss

YieldTo Mat

ModifiedDuration

Years ToMaturity


CUSIP

ROYAL BANK OF CANADA 01/10/2022 .170 25,000,000.00 24,968,125.00 99.988889 24,997,222.22 29,097.22JP MORGAN 03/28/2022 .170 50,000,000.00 49,936,250.00 99.967500 49,983,750.00 47,500.00JP MORGAN 03/28/2022 .170 50,000,000.00 49,936,250.00 99.967500 49,983,750.00 47,500.00NATL SEC CLEARING CORP 03/25/2022 .090 50,000,000.00 49,966,625.00 99.968333 49,984,166.67 17,541.67NATL SEC CLEARING CORP 03/25/2022 .090 50,000,000.00 49,966,625.00 99.968333 49,984,166.67 17,541.67NATL SEC CLEARING CORP 03/22/2022 .090 85,000,000.00 84,944,112.50 99.969167 84,973,791.67 29,679.17JP MORGAN 04/08/2022 .170 35,000,000.00 34,955,705.56 99.964444 34,987,555.56 31,850.00NATL SEC CLEARING CORP 01/25/2022 .060 90,000,000.00 89,973,600.00 99.984722 89,986,250.00 12,650.00RABOBANKNY 02/14/2022 .110 50,000,000.00 49,972,652.78 99.979167 49,989,583.33 16,930.55RABO BANK 02/15/2022 .110 50,000,000.00 49,972,652.78 99.978889 49,989,444.44 16,791.66NATL SEC CLEARING CORP 01/12/2022 .070 20,000,000.00 19,994,633.33 99.988333 19,997,666.67 3,033.34NATL SEC CLEARING CORP 01/12/2022 .070 15,000,000.00 14,996,325.00 99.988333 14,998,250.00 1,925.00APPLE 01/12/2022 .050 50,000,000.00 49,991,805.56 99.988333 49,994,166.67 2,361.11APPLE 01/21/2022 .050 40,000,000.00 39,993,166.67 99.985833 39,994,333.33 1,166.66PROCTER & GAMBLE 01/26/2022 .050 50,000,000.00 49,991,180.56 99.984444 49,992,222.22 1,041.66NATL SEC CLEARING CORP 01/12/2022 .070 20,000,000.00 19,995,877.78 99.988333 19,997,666.67 1,788.89

PROCTER & GAMBLE 01/07/2022 .050 28,500,000.00 28,496,041.67 99.989722 28,497,070.83 1,029.16APPLE 01/12/2022 .050 50,000,000.00 49,992,708.33 99.988333 49,994,166.67 1,458.34PROCTER & GAMBEL 01/10/2022 .050 50,000,000.00 49,992,847.22 99.988889 49,994,444.44 1,597.22APPLE 01/21/2022 .050 40,000,000.00 39,993,944.44 99.985833 39,994,333.33 388.89NATL SEC CLEARING CORP 01/26/2022 .060 40,000,000.00 39,992,400.00 99.984444 39,993,777.78 1,377.78APPLE 01/12/2022 .050 30,000,000.00 29,995,875.00 99.988333 29,996,500.00 625.00APPLE 01/06/2022 .050 55,000,000.00 54,993,125.00 99.990000 54,994,500.00 1,375.00PROCTER & GAMBLE 02/03/2022 .060 25,000,000.00 24,995,541.67 99.982222 24,995,555.56 13.89TOYOTA MOTOR CORP 12/10/2021 .070 50,000,000.00 49,995,722.22 99.997500 49,998,750.00 3,027.78

TOYOTA MOTOR CORP 12/16/2021 .070 25,000,000.00 24,997,812.50 99.995833 24,998,958.33 1,145.83NESTLE 01/11/2022 .060 30,000,000.00 29,996,500.00 99.988611 29,996,583.33 83.33ROCHE HOLDINGS 01/12/2022 .060 30,000,000.00 29,996,500.00 99.988333 29,996,500.00 0.00NESTLE 01/11/2022 .060 50,000,000.00 49,994,250.00 99.988611 49,994,305.56 55.56ROCHE HOLDINGS 01/14/2022 .060 30,000,000.00 29,996,750.00 99.987778 29,996,333.33 -416.67ROCHE HOLDINGS 01/05/2022 .060 30,000,000.00 29,997,200.00 99.990278 29,997,083.33 -116.67ROCHE HOLDINGS 01/10/2022 .050 30,000,000.00 29,997,541.67 99.988889 29,996,666.67 -875.00JP MORGAN 01/18/2022 .120 50,000,000.00 49,989,333.33 99.986667 49,993,333.33 4,000.00JP MORGAN 01/24/2022 .120 90,000,000.00 89,979,300.00 99.985000 89,986,500.00 7,200.00APPLE 01/27/2022 .050 9,440,000.00 9,439,095.33 99.984167 9,438,505.33 -590.00NOVARTIS 12/03/2021 .050 23,000,000.00 22,999,712.50 99.999444 22,999,872.22 159.72TOYOTA MOTOR CORP 12/06/2021 .070 50,000,000.00 49,999,319.44 99.998611 49,999,305.56 -13.88

.082 1,545,940,000.00 1,545,387,107.84 99.983637 1,545,687,031.72 299,923.88

TORONTO DOMINION 12/30/2021 .170 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 100.000000 15,000,000.00 0.00BMO YCD 01/03/2022 .190 60,000,000.00 60,000,000.00 100.000000 60,000,000.00 0.00BMO 01/10/2022 .150 25,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 100.000000 25,000,000.00 0.00ROYAL BANK OF CANADA 02/22/2022 .130 50,000,000.00 50,000,000.00 100.000000 50,000,000.00 0.00

ROYAL BANK OF CANADA 03/22/2022 .130 50,000,000.00 50,000,000.00 100.000000 50,000,000.00 0.00

ROYAL BANK OF CANADA 04/18/2022 .150 50,000,000.00 50,000,000.00 100.000000 50,000,000.00 0.00ROYAL BANK OF CANADA 05/06/2022 .160 45,000,000.00 45,000,000.00 100.000000 45,000,000.00 0.00

NORDEA BK 02/22/2022 .130 50,000,000.00 50,000,000.00 100.000000 50,000,000.00 0.00NORDEA BK 02/22/2022 .130 50,000,000.00 50,000,000.00 100.000000 50,000,000.00 0.00TD YCD 05/16/2022 .170 55,000,000.00 55,000,000.00 100.000000 55,000,000.00 0.00TORONTO DOMINION 01/20/2022 .110 20,000,000.00 20,000,000.00 100.000000 20,000,000.00 0.00NORDEA BK 03/09/2022 .140 30,000,000.00 29,999,998.84 99.999996 29,999,998.84 0.00RABOBANK YCD 05/10/2022 .200 30,000,000.00 30,008,603.09 100.028677 30,008,603.09 0.00BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA 04/07/2022 .230 2,200,000.00 2,200,963.86 100.043812 2,200,963.86 0.00TORONTO DOMINION 01/24/2022 .100 25,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 100.000000 25,000,000.00 0.00ROYAL BANK OF CANADA 05/16/2022 .160 25,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 100.000000 25,000,000.00 0.00TORONTO DOMINION 06/13/2022 .150 30,000,000.00 30,000,000.00 100.000000 30,000,000.00 0.00BMO YCD 06/23/2022 .150 55,000,000.00 55,000,000.00 100.000000 55,000,000.00 0.00BMO YCD 05/05/2022 .160 50,000,000.00 50,000,000.00 100.000000 50,000,000.00 0.00TORONTO DOMINION 07/08/2022 .200 45,000,000.00 45,000,000.00 100.000000 45,000,000.00 0.00BANK OF MONTREAL YCD 07/18/2022 .210 25,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 100.000000 25,000,000.00 0.00BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA 04/13/2022 .220 8,200,000.00 8,201,926.72 100.023497 8,201,926.72 0.00TORONTO DOMINION YCD 10/27/2022 .300 45,000,000.00 45,000,000.00 100.000000 45,000,000.00 0.00TORONTO DOMINION 11/03/2022 .310 55,000,000.00 55,000,000.00 100.000000 55,000,000.00 0.00TORONTO DOMINION 09/29/2022 .280 55,000,000.00 55,000,000.00 100.000000 55,000,000.00 0.00BANK OF MONTREAL 01/31/2022 .110 55,000,000.00 55,000,000.00 100.000000 55,000,000.00 0.00SVENSKA HANDEL 03/03/2022 .155 8,000,000.00 8,000,121.68 100.001521 8,000,121.68 0.00DNB BANK NY 12/29/2021 .060 60,000,000.00 60,000,000.00 100.000000 60,000,000.00 0.00SVENSKA HANDEL 05/12/2022 .205 50,000,000.00 50,001,235.00 100.002470 50,001,235.00 0.00Svenska Handelsbanken YCD 08/12/2022 .280 50,000,000.00 50,000,000.00 100.000000 50,000,000.00 0.00RABOBANK YCD 07/14/2022 .240 50,000,000.00 50,000,000.00 100.000000 50,000,000.00 0.00RABOBANK YCD 08/12/2022 .270 50,000,000.00 50,000,000.00 100.000000 50,000,000.00 0.00ROYAL BANK OF CANADA YCD 11/17/2022 .380 50,000,000.00 50,000,000.00 100.000000 50,000,000.00 0.00ROYAL BANK OF CANADA YCD 10/18/2022 .340 50,000,000.00 50,000,000.00 100.000000 50,000,000.00 0.00BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA 02/16/2022 .150 130,000,000.00 130,000,000.00 100.000000 130,000,000.00 0.00SVENSKA HANDEL 02/17/2022 .135 50,000,000.00 50,000,624.80 100.001250 50,000,624.80 0.00BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA 03/18/2022 .160 25,000,000.00 24,999,991.75 99.999967 24,999,991.75 0.00NORDEA BK YCD 08/19/2022 .330 50,000,000.00 50,000,000.00 100.000000 50,000,000.00 0.00

.192 1,628,400,000.00 1,628,413,465.74 100.000827 1,628,413,465.74 0.00

BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA 05/16/2022 .140 50,000,000.00 50,000,000.00 100.000000 50,000,000.00 0.00.140 50,000,000.00 50,000,000.00 100.000000 50,000,000.00 0.00



.457 75,000,000.00 74,918,675.00 99.385567 74,539,175.00 -379,500.00

.335 9,175,518,477.09 9,175,074,689.36 99.766341 9,154,079,077.30 -20,995,612.06

.335 9,175,518,477.09 9,175,074,689.36 99.766341 9,154,079,077.30 -20,995,612.06Grand Total .328 1.293 1.311

Total Fund .328 1.293 1.311

45950VQL3 .719 2.878 2.915.493 2.795 2.820

45950VPQ3 .273 2.715 2.72945950VQG4 .484 2.791 2.816

.160 .605 .6036040: IFC-Fxd-S 30/360

4520: NCD-Var-SOFR-Q A/36006417MRX5 .160 .605 .603

06417MSB2 .140 .461 .458.140 .461 .458

.718.191 .446 .447

4510: NCD-Var-SOFR-M A/360

78012UZ4006417MSV8

06417MSS565558UJZ6 .330 .715

77119MAE777119MA56

4500: NCD-Mat A/360

89114WKC8

.271

.100 .150 .151

.160 .440 .441

.160

65558UFJ689114WEK7

.350 .351

89114WEM3 .110 .139 .140.140 .271

.130 .230 .230

.170 .456 .458

78012UR80 .160 .429 .430

65558UFJ6 .130 .230 .230

.190

78012UQ65 .130 .306 .307

78012UQ73 .150 .380 .381

06367CEJ2 .150 .112 .11278012UQ57 .130 .230 .230

03785EAM6

03785EAT16698M4Z39

89233GZA7

89233GZG4

77119MAC164105HAB8

78015DAA8

74271UA75

.112 .112.170

.315.090 .315 .315

.323 .323.170 .323 .323.170

.208

63763QCN5 .090 .306 .307.170 .353 .35346640QD81

63763QAR8

.118

21687BBE0.110 .211 .211

.060 .153 .153

.110 .208

.11863763QAC1

.050 .142 .142

.070 .118 .118

.070 .118

.050 .156 .156

.070 .118 .118

.050 .118

.090 .315

21687BBF763763QAC1

03785EAC8

63763QCR6

46640QCU3

.050 .104 .104

74271UAA8.050 .118 .11803785EAC8.050 .112 .112.050 .142 .142

63763QAS6 .060 .156 .156.050 .118 .118.050 .101 .101

.044.060 .115 .115

.060 .178 .178

.070 .027 .027

.060 .118 .11864105HAB8

.070 .044

03785EAC803785EA61

.060 .115 .115

.060 .123 .123

.060 .099 .09977119MAA5 .050 .112 .11246640QAJ0 .120 .134 .13446640QAQ4 .120 .150 .151

.050 .159 .159

.050 .008 .00889233GZ66 .070 .016 .016

.082 .164 .164

.093 .09389114W6J9 .170 .082 .08206367CE52

74271UAS963763QAC1

03785EAM6

74271UB33

46640QCU363763QCR6

65558UEU221684XQS8

89114WEW178012UU29 .160 .456

06417MNJ0

.45889114WG41 .150 .533 .53406367CM53 .150 .560 .56206367CME4 .160 .426 .42789114WHT5 .200 .601 .60306367CMV6 .210 .628 .63006417MNM3 .170 .366 .36789114WJP1 .300 .904 .90789114WKA2 .310 .923 .926

.280 .827 .830

.110 .170 .17006367CNJ286959RSF8 .150 .254 .25523344NLG9 .060 .079 .079

.200 .446 .447

.280 .696 .69986959RUS786959RUX621684XUA2 .240 .617 .61921684XUB0 .270 .696 .699

.216 .216

78012UZ57 .380 .960 .964.340 .879 .882

.160 .296 .296

.150 .213 .21486959RUZ1 .130


54


The Mission Inn, Downtown Riverside. Digital Image. The Mission Inn. http://www.missioninn.com/about-en.html.

55


CAPITAL MARKETS




56



Investment Fund

December 2021

ATTACHMENT 4

57

Contents



3| Economy

4| Market Data

6| Portfolio Data



58
















John Byerly



Isela Licea




Market participants’ attention in Decem-ber was focused on the Federal Open Market Committee’s (FOMC) mid-month policy meeting, where some fairly signifi-cant changes to their monetary policy outlook were announced. The meeting made it clear that FOMC participants are focused on price stability even as the omicron variant poses downside risk to growth. This is welcome news for fixed income investors like the Treasurer-Tax Collector’s Pooled Investment Fund who can benefit from higher rates. Businesses across the economy, faced with labor shortages, are reluctant to re-duce staffing as they try to meet strong demand for goods and services. This has driven new unemployment claims to their lowest level since the late 1960s. Initial Jobless Claims totaled 198k in the week ending December 25th, down 8k from the prior period’s revised level. Continuing claims for state benefits fell to 1.72 million, the lowest since March of last year. The economic bright spot was a 0.4% decrease in the unemployment rate, as it

dropped to 4.2% from 4.6%. This decline occurred due to a 542,000 drop in the number of unemployed, while the civilian labor force rose almost 600,000 and the participation rate increased to 61.8%. Locally, the unemployment rate in the Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario area fell sharply to 5.4% from 6.3% the prior month, and 7.7% the prior year. According to the CPI index reported on December 10, US inflation grew at the fastest pace in nearly 40 years. The in-crease in prices was driven by broad ad-vances in most categories including gaso-line, shelter, food, and vehicles. Historical-ly, the Fed will raise interest rates to slow the economy and dampen inflation, and with the labor picture strong, they seem to have little reason not to move. On December 15, FOMC officials an-nounced they will double the pace of tapering asset purchases, which leaves them set to be completed in March and indicates an earlier liftoff to rate hikes than previously expected. The FOMC is now set to reduce asset purchases by $30

billion a month and their new “dot plot” chart supports the expectation of multiple interest rate hikes in 2022. Simply put, the Fed believes its inflation threshold has been met and the bar for rate hikes rests squarely on the progress of the labor mar-ket. With the Fed communicating their intent to raise rates sooner, bond yields rose substantially in December. As bond mar-ket investors “price in” expected rate changes, the 2-year Treasury yield in-creased in December, beginning the month at 0.56% and ending at 0.73%. The 5- year Treasury yield began the month at 1.14% and ended at 1.26%. Stocks shrugged off interest rate worries with the Dow Jones Industrial Average starting the month at 34,200 and ending at 36,300.


Monthly Commentary When Will the Fed Begin Hiking Interest Rates?





Dec-21 11,219,005,977.66 11,247,581,460.79 (28,575,483.13) -0.254% 0.30 1.12

Nov-21 9,154,079,077.30 9,175,074,689.36 (20,995,612.06) -0.229% 0.33 1.31

Oct-21 9,422,575,640.92 9,437,887,551.30 (15,311,910.38) -0.162% 0.30 1.27

Sep-21 9,560,644,555.86 9,562,128,367.46 (1,483,811.61) -0.015% 0.28 1.19

Aug-21 9,005,666,395.48 8,998,636,800.02 7,029,595.46 0.078% 0.29 1.21

Jul-21 8,738,462,044.75 8,729,419,196.20 9,042,848.55 0.104% 0.30 1.24 *Market values do not include accrued interest.

59


Economy




New Home Sales SAAR

Key Economic Indicators Release Date Indicator Actual Consensus Prior Year 12/22/2021 Real GDP - Q/Q Change 2.3% 2.1% 33.4% 12/03/2021 Unemployment Rate - Seasonally Adjusted 4.2% 4.5% 6.7% 12/03/2021 Non-Farm Payrolls - M/M Change - Thousands 210 550 245 12/10/2021 CPI - Y/Y Change 6.8% 6.8% 1.2% 12/10/2021 CPI Ex Food and Energy - Y/Y Change 4.9% 4.9% 1.6% 12/03/2021 ISM Non-Manufacturing Index (> 50 indicates growth) 69.1 65.0 55.9 12/23/2021 New Home Sales - SAAR - Thousands 744 770 841 12/03/2021 Factory Orders - M/M Change 1.4% 0.5% 1.0% 12/03/2021 Durable Goods Orders - New Orders - M/M Change -0.4% -0.5% 1.3% *Note: 'Prior Year' displays final estimates of indicator values from the equivalent period of the prior year.

60



report.


employment have continued to strengthen, but risks to the economic outlook remain, including from new variants of

the virus.


The FOMC stated in their December statement, they will reduce the monthly pace of its net assets purchases by $20 billion for Treasury securities and $10 billion for agency mortgage-backed securities.




61



U.S. Treasuries


Commodities

Stocks

62






Portfolio Data


funds to cover County expenses for the next twelve months.



Month Monthly Re-





Year 01/2021 625.17 01/2022 1,150.00 2,000.00 -850.00 224.83 - 3,070.64 02/2022 1,100.00 1,500.00 -400.00 400.00 - 760.00 03/2022 1,300.00 1,551.62 -251.62 251.62 - 678.00 04/2022 2,476.30 1,542.08 934.22 934.22 145.40 05/2022 1,700.00 2,200.00 -500.00 434.22 1,007.00 06/2022 2,000.00 2,400.00 -400.00 34.22 394.25 07/2022 1,500.00 1,800.00 -300.00 265.78 - 258.77 08/2022 1,398.14 1,552.97 -154.83 154.83 - 190.23 09/2022 2,050.00 1,804.41 245.59 245.59 250.50 10/2022 1,500.00 1,700.00 -200.00 45.59 277.31 11/2022 1,600.00 1,700.00 -100.00 54.41 - 455.00 12/2022 3,500.00 1,800.00 1700.00 1,700.00 103.25 TOTALS 21,274.44 21,551.08 (276.64) 1,351.47 4,019.01 7,590.34 9,896.11 12.02% 67.48% 87.98%

63



TIMMI





Assets (000's) Scheduled Par Scheduled Book Scheduled Market Mkt/Book WAL(Yr) Mat(Yr) REPO 300,000.00 300,000.00 300,000.00 100.00% 0.038 0.038 MMKT 755,850.06 756,000.00 756,000.00 100.00% 0.003 0.003 CALTRUST FND 93,213.17 94,017.20 94,017.20 100.00% 0.003 0.003 DDA/PASSBK 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 100.00% 0.003 0.003 US TREAS BILLS 945,000.00 944,171.06 944,332.07 100.02% 0.443 0.443 US TREAS BONDS 1,435,000.00 1,433,977.85 1,426,343.97 99.47% 2.014 2.014 FHLMC BONDS 470,710.00 470,276.36 465,182.30 98.92% 1.784 2.725 FNMA BONDS 474,751.00 475,556.58 469,641.36 98.76% 1.871 3.075 FHLB DISC NOTES 50,000.00 49,967.64 49,958.50 99.98% 0.441 0.441 FHLB BONDS 1,048,921.25 1,048,386.86 1,039,948.45 99.20% 2.500 3.425 FFCB DISC NOTES 92,000.00 91,962.39 91,986.33 100.03% 0.180 0.180 FFCB BONDS 519,768.00 519,458.10 517,462.68 99.62% 1.403 2.125 FARMER MAC 10,000.00 9,947.90 10,337.40 103.92% 1.496 1.496 MUNI BONDS 280,305.00 281,285.09 281,285.09 100.00% 1.313 1.313 COMM PAPER 1,864,940.00 1,864,293.49 1,864,705.57 100.02% 0.127 0.127 NCDS 2,233,400.00 2,233,419.14 2,233,419.14 100.00% 0.440 0.440 IBRD DISC NOTES 100,000.00 99,943.13 99,927.25 99.98% 0.435 0.435 IFC BONDS 75,000.00 74,918.68 74,458.68 99.39% 2.74 2.74

Totals (000's): 11,248,858.48 11,247,581.46 11,219,005.98 99.75% 0.92 1.12

64







Compliance Report



Maturity

Authorized % Limit

S&P/ Moody's

Maximum Remaining

Maturity

Authorized % Limit





GRADE 0.00%









A1/P1/F1 2.67%






LIQUIDITY 20% AAA by 2 Of 3

RATINGS AGC.

6.72%


LIQUIDITY Max


CASH/DEPOSIT AC-COUNT NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.45%

65


Coupon ParValue

BookValue

MarketPrice

MarketValue

UnrealizedGain/Loss

BMO BNY TRI PARTY REPO 01/14/2022 .045 300,000,000.00 300,000,000.00 100.000000 300,000,000.00 0.00.045 300,000,000.00 300,000,000.00 100.000000 300,000,000.00 0.00

FIDELITY GOV 01/01/2022 .010 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 100.000000 1,000,000.00 0.00FEDERATED GOV 01/01/2022 .025 11,000,000.00 11,000,000.00 100.000000 11,000,000.00 0.00WELLS FARGO GOV 01/01/2022 .025 111,000,000.00 111,000,000.00 100.000000 111,000,000.00 0.00BLACKROCK GOV 01/01/2022 .025 111,000,000.00 111,000,000.00 100.000000 111,000,000.00 0.00GOLDMAN SACHS GOV 01/01/2022 .026 31,000,000.00 31,000,000.00 100.000000 31,000,000.00 0.00MORGAN STANLEY PRIME 01/01/2022 .060 49,990,002.00 50,000,000.00 100.020000 50,000,000.00 0.00JPM PRIME - UNITY NATIONAL BANK 01/01/2022 .066 99,960,015.99 100,000,000.00 100.040000 100,000,000.00 0.00


JPM PRIME-LIBERTY BANK AND TRUST 01/01/2022 .066 49,980,008.00 50,000,000.00 100.040000 50,000,000.00 0.00

JPM PRIME-MECHANICS AND FARMERS 01/01/2022 .066 99,960,015.99 100,000,000.00 100.040000 100,000,000.00 0.00

JPM PRIME-THE HARBOR BANK OF MAR 01/01/2022 .066 99,960,015.99 100,000,000.00 100.040000 100,000,000.00 0.00

.046 755,850,057.97 756,000,000.00 100.019838 756,000,000.00 0.00


BANK OF THE WEST 01/01/2022 .070 500,000,000.00 500,000,000.00 100.000000 500,000,000.00 0.00.070 500,000,000.00 500,000,000.00 100.000000 500,000,000.00 0.00


.000 0.00 0.00 .000000 0.00 0.00

U.S. TREASURY BILL 02/24/2022 .052 50,000,000.00 49,975,930.00 99.996000 49,998,000.00 22,070.00U.S. TREASURY BILL 02/24/2022 .055 50,000,000.00 49,975,128.47 99.996000 49,998,000.00 22,871.53U.S. TREASURY BILL 03/24/2022 .057 50,000,000.00 49,972,377.78 99.988000 49,994,000.00 21,622.22U.S. TREASURY BILL 03/24/2022 .032 50,000,000.00 49,986,218.75 99.988000 49,994,000.00 7,781.25U.S. TREASURY BILL 06/16/2022 .070 50,000,000.00 49,964,661.67 99.940000 49,970,000.00 5,338.33U.S. TREASURY BILL 02/24/2022 .050 75,000,000.00 74,974,375.00 99.996000 74,997,000.00 22,625.00U.S. TREASURY BILL 10/06/2022 .118 25,000,000.00 24,971,767.36 99.909264 24,977,315.97 5,548.61U.S. TREASURY BILL 01/11/2022 .053 35,000,000.00 34,996,120.83 99.998542 34,999,489.58 3,368.75U.S. TREASURY BILL 02/22/2022 .050 50,000,000.00 49,991,875.00 99.992778 49,996,388.89 4,513.89U.S. TREASURY BILL 10/06/2022 .116 110,000,000.00 109,878,425.56 99.910422 109,901,464.45 23,038.89U.S. TREASURY BILL 12/01/2022 .240 25,000,000.00 24,939,333.25 99.777333 24,944,333.26 5,000.01U.S. TREASURY BILL 11/03/2022 .200 50,000,000.00 49,907,777.78 99.830000 49,915,000.00 7,222.22U.S. TREASURY BILL 04/12/2022 .077 25,000,000.00 24,993,719.44 99.981000 24,995,250.00 1,530.56U.S. TREASURY BILL 10/06/2022 .200 25,000,000.00 24,958,888.89 99.845556 24,961,388.89 2,500.00U.S. TREASURY BILL 05/26/2022 .093 25,000,000.00 24,989,529.51 99.962743 24,990,685.76 1,156.25U.S. TREASURY BILL 06/23/2022 .158 25,000,000.00 24,980,258.00 99.920000 24,980,000.00 -258.00U.S. TREASURY BILL 05/19/2022 .093 50,000,000.00 49,981,787.50 99.963000 49,981,500.00 -287.50U.S. TREASURY BILL 06/30/2022 .200 50,000,000.00 49,949,444.44 99.909000 49,954,500.00 5,055.56U.S. TREASURY BILL 05/19/2022 .093 50,000,000.00 49,982,013.89 99.963000 49,981,500.00 -513.89U.S. TREASURY BILL 05/19/2022 .093 25,000,000.00 24,991,006.94 99.963000 24,990,750.00 -256.94U.S. TREASURY BILL 12/29/2022 .375 50,000,000.00 49,810,416.67 99.623000 49,811,500.00 1,083.33

.113 945,000,000.00 944,171,056.73 99.929319 944,332,066.80 161,010.07

U.S. TREASURY BOND 11/30/2024 1.500 25,000,000.00 24,705,078.13 101.598000 25,399,500.00 694,421.87U.S. TREASURY BOND 01/31/2026 .375 10,000,000.00 9,897,265.63 96.789000 9,678,900.00 -218,365.63U.S. TREASURY BOND 01/31/2026 .375 10,000,000.00 9,894,140.63 96.789000 9,678,900.00 -215,240.63U.S. TREASURY BOND 02/15/2024 .125 25,000,000.00 24,930,664.06 98.711000 24,677,750.00 -252,914.06U.S. TREASURY BOND 04/30/2025 .375 15,000,000.00 14,956,640.63 97.813000 14,671,950.00 -284,690.63U.S. TREASURY BOND 02/15/2026 1.625 10,000,000.00 10,401,560.00 101.766000 10,176,600.00 -224,960.00U.S. TREASURY BOND 02/15/2026 1.625 10,000,000.00 10,466,015.63 101.766000 10,176,600.00 -289,415.63U.S. TREASURY BOND 07/31/2025 .250 25,000,000.00 24,537,109.38 97.035000 24,258,750.00 -278,359.38U.S. TREASURY BOND 02/28/2026 .500 20,000,000.00 19,910,508.60 97.207000 19,441,400.00 -469,108.60U.S. TREASURY BOND 02/28/2025 1.125 10,000,000.00 10,231,250.00 100.383000 10,038,300.00 -192,950.00U.S. TREASURY BOND 03/15/2024 .250 50,000,000.00 49,945,312.50 98.820000 49,410,000.00 -535,312.50U.S. TREASURY BOND 03/31/2025 .500 25,000,000.00 24,855,468.75 98.371000 24,592,750.00 -262,718.75U.S. TREASURY BOND 03/31/2023 .125 50,000,000.00 49,966,796.88 99.543000 49,771,500.00 -195,296.88U.S. TREASURY BOND 03/31/2025 .500 25,000,000.00 24,882,812.50 98.371000 24,592,750.00 -290,062.50U.S. TREASURY BOND 03/31/2023 .125 50,000,000.00 49,978,515.63 99.543000 49,771,500.00 -207,015.63U.S. TREASURY BOND 05/31/2022 .125 50,000,000.00 50,035,156.25 99.984000 49,992,000.00 -43,156.25U.S. TREASURY BOND 05/31/2022 .125 50,000,000.00 50,029,296.88 99.984000 49,992,000.00 -37,296.88U.S. TREASURY BOND 05/31/2022 .125 75,000,000.00 75,043,945.31 99.984000 74,988,000.00 -55,945.31U.S. TREASURY BOND 06/30/2026 .875 20,000,000.00 19,993,166.80 98.469000 19,693,800.00 -299,366.80U.S. TREASURY BOND 06/30/2026 .875 35,000,000.00 34,946,679.69 98.469000 34,464,150.00 -482,529.69U.S. TREASURY BOND 06/30/2022 .125 30,000,000.00 30,014,062.50 99.961000 29,988,300.00 -25,762.50U.S. TREASURY BOND 12/31/2025 .375 25,000,000.00 24,652,343.75 96.973000 24,243,250.00 -409,093.75U.S. TREASURY BOND 08/31/2026 .750 25,000,000.00 24,900,416.25 97.820000 24,455,000.00 -445,416.25U.S. TREASURY BOND 09/15/2024 .375 25,000,000.00 24,952,148.44 99.808594 24,952,148.44 0.00U.S. TREASURY BOND 03/31/2026 .750 25,000,000.00 25,039,062.50 98.152000 24,538,000.00 -501,062.50U.S. TREASURY BOND 09/15/2024 .375 25,000,000.00 24,953,125.00 99.812500 24,953,125.00 0.00U.S. TREASURY BOND 08/31/2026 .750 25,000,000.00 24,817,382.81 97.820000 24,455,000.00 -362,382.81U.S.. TREASURY BOND 09/30/2026 .875 20,000,000.00 19,895,833.60 99.479168 19,895,833.60 0.00U.S. TREASURY BOND 09/30/2025 .250 25,000,000.00 24,445,312.50 96.875000 24,218,750.00 -226,562.50U.S. TREASURY BOND 10/31/2023 1.625 20,000,000.00 20,536,718.75 101.691000 20,338,200.00 -198,518.75U.S. TREASURY BOND 07/31/2023 1.250 50,000,000.00 50,818,359.38 101.008000 50,504,000.00 -314,359.38U.S. TREASURY BOND 05/15/2023 .125 50,000,000.00 49,867,187.50 99.430000 49,715,000.00 -152,187.50U.S. TREASURY BOND 09/30/2025 .250 25,000,000.00 24,323,242.19 96.875000 24,218,750.00 -104,492.19U.S. TREASURY BOND 04/15/2023 .250 25,000,000.00 24,994,140.63 99.668000 24,917,000.00 -77,140.63U.S. TREASURY BOND 02/28/2023 2.625 25,000,000.00 25,803,710.94 102.473000 25,618,250.00 -185,460.94U.S. TREASURY BOND 04/30/2023 .125 25,000,000.00 24,930,664.06 99.469000 24,867,250.00 -63,414.06U.S. TREASURY BOND 05/31/2023 .125 25,000,000.00 24,917,968.75 99.383000 24,845,750.00 -72,218.75U.S. TREASURY BOND 03/31/2023 .125 25,000,000.00 24,941,406.25 99.543000 24,885,750.00 -55,656.25U.S. TREASURY BOND 10/15/2024 .625 25,000,000.00 24,905,273.44 99.621094 24,905,273.44 0.00U.S. TREASURY BOND 07/31/2023 .125 25,000,000.00 24,885,742.19 99.542969 24,885,742.19 0.00U.S. TREASURY BILL 01/31/2023 .125 50,000,000.00 49,916,015.63 99.656000 49,828,000.00 -88,015.63U.S. TREASURY BOND 02/28/2023 .125 50,000,000.00 49,882,812.50 99.590000 49,795,000.00 -87,812.50


91282CCD191282CBU4

91282CCN991282CBG5

1170: MGD RATE-A/360CASHCASH


91282CCJ891282CCJ8

91282CBC491282CCW9

91282CBU4912828ZR4

912796H44

912796M89

912796F38

912796D30

912796Q36912796R43

FRGXX

WFFXX

1080: MGD RATE-A/365-6

1060: MMKT ACCTS-A/365-6

48123X819

48123X819

48123X819

4812CA538

48123X819

1065: CLTR-A/365-6

91282CBH3

912828YV6

CLTR

912796R92

912796T82912796N96

91282CBX8

TFDXX

91282CAM3912828ZH6

912828ZF0

91282CBR1

91282CBH3

91282CBQ3

91282CBM2912828ZL7

912828ZR4

912828ZC7

912828P46912828P46

912828ZR4

.301 1.164 1.162

.384 1.578 1.581

.259 1.081 1.085

.288 1.247 1.247

.754 2.755 2.792

.307 1.330 1.329

.330 1.413 1.414

.266 1.285 1.288

.254 1.146 1.162

.293 1.369 1.370

.950 3.715 3.751

.319 1.807 1.833

.334 1.562 1.581

2.710

.982 4.630 4.751

.815 3.717 3.751

4.564 4.668

.715 4.168 4.249

.902 4.562 4.668

.438 2.686

.439 2.686 2.710

.906 4.402 4.499

.700 3.960 4.003

.832

.077 .495 .496

.065 .413 .414

.882 4.403 4.499

.054 .413 .414

.066 .413 .414

.619 3.214 3.249

.147 1.248 1.247

.647 3.213 3.249

.159 1.248 1.247

.539 3.101 3.164

.287 2.196 2.205

.675 3.554 3.584

.591 4.110 4.164

.799 3.967 4.129

.670 3.970 4.129

.219 2.117 2.126

.586 4.038

.445 3.306 3.332

1.751 2.836 2.9184.088

.593 4.038 4.088

.113 .442 .443

.093 .380 .381

.376 .990 .995

.200 .495 .496

.093 .380 .381

.156 .476 .477

.093 .380 .381

.200 .762 .764

.093 .399 .400

.200 .839 .841

.076 .279 .279

.116 .763 .764

.241 .915 .918

.053 .030 .030

.050 .145 .145

.050 .151 .151

.118 .763 .764

.227 .227.070 .457 .458

912796F38912796J42

.032

.151 .151.055 .150 .151.057 .227 .227

.052

.000 .003.000 .000 .000.069

1.530 .000 .0031.515 .000 .003

.070 .003 .003.070 .003 .003

.109 .003 .003.109

.045

.003 .003

.003 .003

.064 .003 .003

.003 .003

.003

.064 .003 .003

.026 .003 .003

.003.003 .003.026.003 .003.059

.003.025 .003 .003.010

.003 .003.025

.038.045 .038.038

Fund: 1 POOL FUND

1000: REPOS-A/360REPO .045 .038

91282CAB7

.003

.025 .003

.064 .003

.064

YieldTo Mat

ModifiedDuration

Years ToMaturity


CUSIP

912796P94

912796M89

912796H44912796R50

912796D30

CASH

912828T91

GOFXX

912796Q69

91282CAM3

912828ZF091282CBU4

912828ZX1

FGTXXMVRXX

CASH

912796D30912796M89

91282CCZ2

9128284A5

91282CDB4

912828S92912828ZP8

912796H44912796R27

91282CCX791282CBT7

91282CCW991282CCX7

91282CBN0


66


Coupon ParValue

BookValue

MarketPrice

MarketValue

UnrealizedGain/Loss

YieldTo Mat

ModifiedDuration

Years ToMaturity


CUSIP

U.S. TREASURY BOND 06/15/2023 .250 50,000,000.00 49,830,078.13 99.539000 49,769,500.00 -60,578.13U.S. TREASURY BOND 06/30/2022 .125 25,000,000.00 24,997,070.31 99.961000 24,990,250.00 -6,820.31U.S. TREASURY BOND 11/30/2022 .125 50,000,000.00 49,906,250.00 99.773000 49,886,500.00 -19,750.00U.S. TREASURY BOND 06/15/2022 1.750 50,000,000.00 50,394,531.25 100.723000 50,361,500.00 -33,031.25U.S. TREASURY BOND 05/31/2023 .125 25,000,000.00 24,849,609.38 99.383000 24,845,750.00 -3,859.38

.473 1,435,000,000.00 1,433,977,852.51 99.396793 1,426,343,972.67 -7,633,879.84

FHLMC 5YrNc9MoB 08/19/2025 .625 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.183000 9,818,300.00 -181,700.00.625 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.183000 9,818,300.00 -181,700.00

FHLMC 5YrNc1YrQ 05/27/2025 .750 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.163000 9,916,300.00 -83,700.00FHLMC 5YrNc1YrQ 05/28/2025 .730 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.091000 9,909,100.00 -90,900.00FHLMC 5YrNc1YrQ 05/28/2025 .730 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 99.091000 4,954,550.00 -45,450.00FHLMC 4YrNc2YrO 06/03/2024 .500 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.304000 9,930,400.00 -69,600.00FHLMC 4.9YrNc11MoB 05/28/2025 .750 15,000,000.00 14,992,500.00 99.092000 14,863,800.00 -128,700.00FHLMC 5YrNc2YrB 06/09/2025 .650 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 98.562000 14,784,300.00 -215,700.00FHLMC 4YrNc2YrO 07/01/2024 .500 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 99.056000 4,952,800.00 -47,200.00FHLMC 4YrNc1YrQ 07/15/2024 .570 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 100.011000 5,000,550.00 550.00FHLMC 3.5YrNc1.5YrB 01/24/2024 .420 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 99.666000 14,949,900.00 -50,100.00FHLMC 3.75YrNC9MB 04/29/2024 .500 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 99.494000 14,924,100.00 -75,900.00FHLMC 4.5YrNc2YrB 01/29/2025 .510 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 98.606000 14,790,900.00 -209,100.00FHLMC 4YrNc1.5YrQ 09/10/2024 .400 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.357000 9,835,700.00 -164,300.00FHLMC 4YrNc6MoQ 09/10/2024 .450 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.910000 9,891,000.00 -109,000.00FHLMC 4YrNc1.5YrQ 09/10/2024 .400 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.357000 9,835,700.00 -164,300.00FHLMC 4YrNc6MoQ 09/11/2024 .450 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.907000 9,890,700.00 -109,300.00FHLMC 5YrNc2YrQ 09/15/2025 .540 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 97.807000 9,780,700.00 -219,300.00FHLMC 5YrNc2YrQ 09/15/2025 .540 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 97.807000 14,671,050.00 -328,950.00FHLMC 4.75YrNc2YrQ 06/16/2025 .500 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 97.977000 4,898,850.00 -101,150.00FHLMC 4.5YrNc1YrQ 03/24/2025 .475 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 98.157000 14,723,550.00 -276,450.00FHLMC 3.75YrNc1YrQ 06/24/2024 .410 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.041000 9,904,100.00 -95,900.00FHLMC 5YrNC1.5YrB 03/28/2025 .500 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.218000 9,821,800.00 -178,200.00FHLMC 5YrNC6mOB 09/30/2025 .600 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 97.978000 4,898,900.00 -101,100.00FHLMC 5YrNC3MoB 10/27/2025 .625 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.021000 9,802,100.00 -197,900.00FHLMC 5YrNc1YrQ 10/28/2025 .600 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 97.894000 9,789,400.00 -210,600.00FHLMC 5YrNc2YrQ 10/28/2025 .550 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 97.734000 9,773,400.00 -226,600.00FHLMC 5Yr 09/23/2025 .375 10,000,000.00 9,941,100.00 97.315000 9,731,500.00 -209,600.00FHLMC 3Yr 11/06/2023 .250 10,000,000.00 9,991,000.00 99.126000 9,912,600.00 -78,400.00FHLMC 5YrNc1YrQ 11/12/2025 .600 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 97.651000 4,882,550.00 -117,450.00FHLMC 5YrNc1YrQ 11/12/2025 .600 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 97.651000 4,882,550.00 -117,450.00FHLMC 3YrNC2YrA 11/16/2023 .300 15,000,000.00 14,988,750.00 99.271000 14,890,650.00 -98,100.00FHLMC 5YrNC2YrA 11/17/2025 .560 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 97.855000 4,892,750.00 -107,250.00FHLMC 5YrNC2YrA 11/17/2025 .560 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 97.855000 4,892,750.00 -107,250.00FHLMC 2YrNc1YrQ 11/23/2022 .190 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.945000 9,994,500.00 -5,500.00FHLMC 3YrNc1YrQ 11/24/2023 .320 10,000,000.00 9,997,500.00 99.267000 9,926,700.00 -70,800.00FHLMC 2YrNc1YrQ 11/23/2022 .200 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.881000 9,988,100.00 -11,900.00FHLMC 2YrNc1YrQ 11/23/2022 .200 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.881000 9,988,100.00 -11,900.00FHLMC 3.5YrNc11MoQ 05/24/2024 .400 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.317000 9,931,700.00 -68,300.00FHLMC 3.5YrNc11MoQ 05/24/2024 .400 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.317000 9,931,700.00 -68,300.00FHLMC 2.5YrNC1YrB 06/01/2023 .250 10,000,000.00 9,997,500.00 99.772000 9,977,200.00 -20,300.00FHLMC 3YrNC11MoB 11/24/2023 .320 10,710,000.00 10,707,322.50 99.267000 10,631,495.70 -75,826.80FHLMC 2.5YrNC1YrB 06/01/2023 .250 10,000,000.00 9,995,000.00 99.772000 9,977,200.00 -17,800.00FHLMC 2.5YrNC1YrB 06/01/2023 .250 10,000,000.00 9,998,500.00 99.772000 9,977,200.00 -21,300.00FHLMC 2YrNc1YrQ 12/15/2022 .200 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.876000 9,987,600.00 -12,400.00FHLMC 5YrNC3MoB 12/30/2025 .700 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.459000 9,845,900.00 -154,100.00FHLMC 2.5YrNC1YrB 06/30/2023 .220 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.540000 9,954,000.00 -46,000.00FHLMC 3.83YrNc1MoQ 10/22/2025 .650 15,000,000.00 14,667,187.50 97.824000 14,673,600.00 6,412.50

.461 460,710,000.00 460,276,360.00 98.839616 455,363,995.70 -4,912,364.30

FNMA 5Yr 01/19/2023 2.375 10,000,000.00 9,944,100.00 102.054000 10,205,400.00 261,300.00FNMA 4.41Yr 09/12/2023 2.875 30,000,000.00 30,670,500.00 103.698000 31,109,400.00 438,900.00FNMA 4.83Yr 01/07/2025 1.625 10,000,000.00 10,247,300.00 101.827000 10,182,700.00 -64,600.00FNMA 5YrNc2YrQ 06/30/2025 .650 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 98.283000 4,914,150.00 -85,850.00FNMA 5YrNc1YrQ 06/30/2025 .740 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 98.596000 4,929,800.00 -70,200.00FNMA 5YrNc1YrQ 07/07/2025 .740 14,900,000.00 14,900,000.00 98.588000 14,689,612.00 -210,388.00FNMA 5YrNc1YrQ 07/15/2025 .730 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 98.552000 14,782,800.00 -217,200.00FNMA 5YrNc1YrB 07/29/2025 .700 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 98.435000 14,765,250.00 -234,750.00FNMA 5YrNc2YrB 07/29/2025 .600 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.085000 9,808,500.00 -191,500.00FNMA 5YrNc2YrB 07/29/2025 .600 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.085000 9,808,500.00 -191,500.00FNMA 5YrNc1YrB 08/04/2025 .700 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.437000 9,843,700.00 -156,300.00FNMA 5YrNc1YrB 08/04/2025 .700 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 98.437000 14,765,550.00 -234,450.00FNMA 4YrNc2YrB 08/12/2024 .410 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 98.743000 14,811,450.00 -188,550.00FNMA 3YrNC1.5YrB 08/17/2023 .310 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 99.661000 14,949,150.00 -50,850.00FNMA 5YrNc2Yr 08/19/2025 .550 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 97.829000 14,674,350.00 -325,650.00FNMA 5YrNc1YrQ 08/27/2025 .650 8,650,000.00 8,650,000.00 98.175000 8,492,137.50 -157,862.50FNMA 5YrNc1YrQ 08/27/2025 .625 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 98.088000 4,904,400.00 -95,600.00FNMA 3.5YrNc1.5YrQ 02/28/2024 .375 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.401000 9,940,100.00 -59,900.00FNMA 4.9YrNc11MoQ 08/26/2025 .600 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 97.999000 9,799,900.00 -200,100.00FNMA 3.9YrNc1.9YrQ 08/19/2024 .450 3,701,000.00 3,701,000.00 99.153000 3,669,652.53 -31,347.47FNMA 4YrNc2Yr 09/16/2024 .400 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.774000 9,877,400.00 -122,600.00FNMA 3.5YrNC2YrA 03/28/2024 .320 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.078000 9,907,800.00 -92,200.00FNMA 5YrNC1YrB 10/20/2025 .580 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 97.882000 9,788,200.00 -211,800.00FNMA 5YrNC2YrA 10/27/2025 .540 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 97.727000 9,772,700.00 -227,300.00FNMA 5YrNc2YrA 10/28/2025 .560 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 97.802000 4,890,100.00 -109,900.00FNMA 5YrNc1YrQ 10/29/2025 .600 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 97.950000 4,897,500.00 -102,500.00FNMA 5YrNc1YrQ 10/29/2025 .600 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 97.950000 9,795,000.00 -205,000.00FNMA 5YrNc1YrQ 10/29/2025 .600 10,000,000.00 9,998,000.00 97.950000 9,795,000.00 -203,000.00FNMA 5YrNc2YrA 11/04/2025 .550 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 97.763000 9,776,300.00 -223,700.00FNMA 4.9YrNc11MoQ 10/20/2025 .580 10,000,000.00 9,996,500.00 97.882000 9,788,200.00 -208,300.00FNMA 3.5YrNc2YrQ 05/03/2024 .350 3,500,000.00 3,499,300.00 99.218000 3,472,630.00 -26,670.00FNMA 5Yr 11/07/2025 .500 14,000,000.00 13,949,880.00 97.592000 13,662,880.00 -287,000.00FNMA 3YrNC2YrB 11/16/2023 .300 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.202000 9,920,200.00 -79,800.00FNMA 3.5YrNc2YrQ 05/17/2024 .350 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.188000 9,918,800.00 -81,200.00FNMA 3.5YrNc2YrQ 05/17/2024 .350 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.188000 9,918,800.00 -81,200.00FNMA 5YrNc2YrA 11/17/2025 .560 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 97.855000 9,785,500.00 -214,500.00FNMA 4YrNC2YrB 11/18/2024 .420 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.384000 9,838,400.00 -161,600.00FNMA 5YrNC2YrA 11/18/2025 .650 20,000,000.00 20,000,000.00 98.124000 19,624,800.00 -375,200.00FNMA 3.25YrNc2YrA 02/23/2024 .350 20,000,000.00 20,000,000.00 99.277000 19,855,400.00 -144,600.00

3135GA4P33135GA5A5

1420: FHLMC-Fxd-Q 30/360

1425: FHLMC-Fxd-S 30/360

3134GXEA83134GXEA8

3135GA2Z3

3134GXEX83134GXCA0

3135G06C23135GA2N0

3135GA3C3

1525: FNMA-Fxd-S 30/360

3135GA3N93135GA3C3

3136G45C3

3135GA2Z3

3135G06C2

3136G4H633136G4Q97

3134GWL38

3134GWT22

3135G06A6

9128286Y1

3134GW3Z7

3134GXBM5

3136G4F32

3136G46N8

3135GA2P53135G06G3

3134GXHH0

3136G4XZ1

3134GXEX8

3134GXDG63134GXCA0

3134GXHL1

3134GXCF93134GXCF9

3135G0T94

3134GW3Y0

.650 3.823 3.885

.350 2.132 2.148

.560 3.828 3.882

.420 2.859 2.885

.350 2.365 2.378

.350 2.365 2.378

.573 3.804 3.855

.300 1.868 1.877

.587 3.752 3.805

.356 2.326 2.340

.600 3.775 3.8303.775 3.830

.550 3.793 3.847

.604

.540 3.775 3.825

.600 3.775 3.830

.560 3.776 3.827

.400 2.688 2.712

.320 2.230 2.241

1.627

.650 3.658

.580 3.752 3.805

.450 2.611 2.636

.6253.599

.375 2.153 2.1623.6583.601

3.578.600 3.526 3.578

.600 3.600 3.655

.550

.700

3.585 3.636

.700 3.531 3.595

2.6163.531 3.595

.410

.310 1.621

2.333 1.636 1.699

.650 3.455

2.593

.740 3.453

.600 3.526

3.022

3.476 3.540.700 3.517 3.578

3.518.730

.740 3.449 3.4993.499

1.094 2.918

2.495 1.020 1.052

1.238 3.739 3.811.485 2.669 2.699

.700 3.938 4.000

.220 1.497 1.496

.256 1.413 1.416

.200 .954 .956

.328 1.889 1.899

.270 1.413 1.416

.260 1.413 1.416

.400 2.382 2.397

.400 2.382 2.397

1.889 1.899.200 .893 .896

.893 .896.200

.328

3.882

.325 1.867

.190 .893 .896

.560 3.828

.600 3.811 3.8681.877

.560 3.828 3.882

.280 1.841 1.849

.600 3.811 3.868

3.772 3.827.550 3.776 3.827.497 3.692 3.732

.600

.600 3.697 3.751

.625 3.767 3.825

.410 2.465 2.482

.500 3.208 3.241

.500 3.424 3.460

.475 3.198 3.230

.540 3.658 3.710

.540 3.658 3.710

.400 2.671 2.6963134GWN44 .450 2.672 2.6993134GWL79

.400 2.671 2.696

.450 2.669 2.696

.500 2.310 2.329

.510 3.043 3.082

.570 2.511 2.540

.420 2.049 2.066

.650 3.394 3.441

.500 2.478 2.501

.500 2.404 2.425

.760 3.357 3.408

.730 3.358 3.4083134GVWM6 .730 3.358 3.4083134GVWM6

.750 3.354 3.405

.625 3.587 3.636.625 3.587 3.636

.415 1.981 2.004

.108 .454 .455

.551 1.412 1.414

.146 .495 .496

.318 .915 .915

.469 1.450 1.455

3136G4B773136G4B77

3135G0U43

3134GWR32

3134GWP91

3135G06A6

3134GWP26

3136G42F9

3136G46S7

3136G4YU1

3136G4K51

3136G4XK4

3134GWL79

3135GA2Z3

3134GWL38

3134GVRV2

3137EAEZ83137EAEX3

3136G4D75

3136G4C27

3134GWCM6

3134GXGQ1

3135G0X24

3134GV3A4

91282CCD1

3134GWLW4

3134GV5R5

3134GWN85

3134GWET9

3134GVYX03134GVB31

3136G4J38

3136G4Z97

3136G4P313136G43H4

3134GWZV1

3136G4XR9

3134GXBM5

3134GWAL0

3134GVE95

912828ZU7

3136G4X40

3134GXEX8

3136G43W1

3135G06E8

912828ZX191282CAX9

3134GWTG13134GW3X2

3134GXBL7


67


Coupon ParValue

BookValue

MarketPrice

MarketValue

UnrealizedGain/Loss

YieldTo Mat

ModifiedDuration

Years ToMaturity


CUSIP

FNMA 3.75YrNc2YrA 08/23/2024 .420 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 99.106000 14,865,900.00 -134,100.00FNMA 5YrNc2YrA 11/25/2025 .600 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 97.925000 14,688,750.00 -311,250.00FNMA 2.9YrNc2YrQ 11/16/2023 .310 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 99.544000 4,977,200.00 -22,800.00FNMA 4.5YrNc1.5YrB 06/24/2025 .500 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 97.774000 9,777,400.00 -222,600.00

.741 474,751,000.00 475,556,580.00 98.923723 469,641,362.03 -5,915,217.97

FHLB 6Mo 06/10/2022 .128 50,000,000.00 49,967,644.44 99.917000 49,958,500.00 -9,144.44.128 50,000,000.00 49,967,644.44 99.917000 49,958,500.00 -9,144.44


1.024 90,000,000.00 90,000,000.00 99.138722 89,224,850.00 -775,150.00

FHLB 5YrNc6MoQ 12/30/2026 1.500 25,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 100.000000 25,000,000.00 0.001.500 25,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 100.000000 25,000,000.00 0.00

FHLB 4.9Yr 03/10/2023 2.125 11,750,000.00 11,432,397.50 101.938000 11,977,715.00 545,317.50FHLB 4.25YrNc3MoA 12/09/2024 .500 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.627000 9,862,700.00 -137,300.00FHLB 2 Yr 10/21/2022 .125 10,000,000.00 9,989,900.00 99.868000 9,986,800.00 -3,100.00FHLB 3YrNc1YrA 12/22/2023 .190 15,000,000.00 14,979,900.00 99.225000 14,883,750.00 -96,150.00FHLB 3YrNc6MoB 12/28/2023 .250 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.323000 9,932,300.00 -67,700.00FHLB 3.25YrNc6MoA 03/28/2024 .270 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 98.843000 14,826,450.00 -173,550.00FHLB 3.5YrNc1YrB 06/28/2024 .260 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 98.876000 14,831,400.00 -168,600.00FHLB 3.5YrNc1YrB 06/28/2024 .260 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.876000 9,887,600.00 -112,400.00FHLB 3.25YrNc6MoA 03/28/2024 .270 15,000,000.00 14,995,500.00 98.843000 14,826,450.00 -169,050.00FHLB 5YrNc6MoQ 02/18/2026 .600 5,000,000.00 4,996,250.00 97.774000 4,888,700.00 -107,550.00FHLB 5YrNc1YrQ 02/23/2026 .580 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 97.920000 9,792,000.00 -208,000.00FHLB 4.25Yr1YrQ 05/23/2025 .500 14,750,000.00 14,750,000.00 97.755000 14,418,862.50 -331,137.50FHLB 4.5YrNc1YrQ 08/25/2025 .550 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 97.750000 4,887,500.00 -112,500.00FHLB 5YrNc1YrA 02/25/2026 .580 6,000,000.00 6,000,000.00 97.962000 5,877,720.00 -122,280.00FHLB 5YrNc3MoQ 02/25/2026 .790 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 98.915000 14,837,250.00 -162,750.00FHLB 5YrNc3MoQ 02/25/2026 .790 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.915000 9,891,500.00 -108,500.00FHLB 3.75YrNc6MoB 11/26/2024 .400 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 98.343000 4,917,150.00 -82,850.00FHLB 5YrNc3MoQ 02/26/2026 .850 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.760000 9,876,000.00 -124,000.00FHLB 5YrNc1YrQ 03/16/2026 .700 25,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 98.257000 24,564,250.00 -435,750.00FHLB 5YrNc1YrA 03/18/2026 .750 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.278000 9,827,800.00 -172,200.00FHLB 4.25YrNc1YrQ 06/18/2025 .530 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 97.830000 9,783,000.00 -217,000.00FHLB 5YrNc1YrA 03/18/2026 .750 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.278000 9,827,800.00 -172,200.00FHLB 5YrNc3MoQ 03/18/2026 .790 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 98.326000 14,748,900.00 -251,100.00FHLB 5YrNc1YrA 03/18/2026 .750 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.278000 9,827,800.00 -172,200.00FHLB 5YrNc1MoM 03/23/2026 1.000 14,625,000.00 14,625,000.00 98.931000 14,468,658.75 -156,341.25FHLB 5YrNc1MoM 03/23/2026 1.000 9,750,000.00 9,750,000.00 98.931000 9,645,772.50 -104,227.50FHLB 5YrNc1MoM 03/23/2026 1.000 14,625,000.00 14,625,000.00 98.931000 14,468,658.75 -156,341.25FHLB 5YrNc1MoM 03/23/2026 1.000 8,921,250.00 8,914,559.06 98.931000 8,825,881.84 -88,677.22FHLB 5YrNc1MoM 03/23/2026 1.000 9,750,000.00 9,750,000.00 98.931000 9,645,772.50 -104,227.50FHLB 5YrNc1MoM 03/23/2026 1.000 19,500,000.00 19,500,000.00 98.931000 19,291,545.00 -208,455.00FHLB 5YrNc1MoM 03/23/2026 1.000 19,500,000.00 19,500,000.00 98.931000 19,291,545.00 -208,455.00FHLB 5YrNc1MoM 03/23/2026 1.000 9,750,000.00 9,750,000.00 98.931000 9,645,772.50 -104,227.50FHLB 4YrNc6MoB 03/24/2025 .700 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.801000 9,880,100.00 -119,900.00FHLB 4YrNc1YrB 03/25/2025 .625 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.555000 9,855,500.00 -144,500.00FHLB 4YrNc1YrB 03/25/2025 .625 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.555000 9,855,500.00 -144,500.00FHLB 4YrNc1YrB 03/25/2025 .625 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.555000 9,855,500.00 -144,500.00FHLB 4YrNc3MoB 03/17/2025 .650 15,000,000.00 14,977,500.00 98.646000 14,796,900.00 -180,600.00FHLB 3.5YrNc6MoQ 09/30/2024 .510 25,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 98.337000 24,584,250.00 -415,750.00FHLB 4.25YrNc6MoQ 06/30/2025 .750 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.584000 9,858,400.00 -141,600.00FHLB 3YrNC3MB 04/08/2024 .375 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.309000 9,930,900.00 -69,100.00FHLB 4YrNC6MoB 04/08/2025 .720 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 98.863000 14,829,450.00 -170,550.00FHLB 3.91YrNC2MoB 03/17/2025 .650 25,000,000.00 24,950,000.00 98.646000 24,661,500.00 -288,500.00FHLB 9Mo 02/01/2022 .045 25,000,000.00 24,998,865.00 99.980000 24,995,000.00 -3,865.00FHLB 5YrNc6MoQ 05/26/2026 1.050 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 99.104000 14,865,600.00 -134,400.00FHLB 5YrNc6MoQ 05/26/2026 1.000 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.946000 9,894,600.00 -105,400.00FHLB 5YrNc6MoQ 05/26/2026 1.030 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 99.050000 4,952,500.00 -47,500.00FHLB 5YrNC1YrB 06/10/2026 1.000 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 98.947000 4,947,350.00 -52,650.00FHLB 5YrNc3MOQ 07/22/2026 1.000 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 98.841000 14,826,150.00 -173,850.00FHLB 5YrNc3MoQ 07/27/2026 1.000 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 98.829000 14,824,350.00 -175,650.00FHLB 5YrNc3MoQ 07/27/2026 1.000 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.829000 9,882,900.00 -117,100.00FHLB 5YrNc3MoA 08/05/2026 1.000 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.173000 9,917,300.00 -82,700.00FHLB 5YrNC1MoM 08/17/2026 1.000 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.022000 9,902,200.00 -97,800.00FHLB 5YrNC1MoM 08/20/2026 1.100 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.832000 9,883,200.00 -116,800.00FHLB 5YrNc6MoQ 08/25/2026 1.000 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.822000 9,882,200.00 -117,800.00FHLB 5YrNc3MoM 08/26/2026 1.000 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 99.200000 14,880,000.00 -120,000.00FHLB 5YrNc3MoQ 08/26/2026 1.000 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 100.000000 15,000,000.00 0.00FHLB 3.25YrNc3MoQ 12/17/2024 .550 10,000,000.00 9,999,000.00 99.089000 9,908,900.00 -90,100.00FHLB 3YrNc3MoQ 09/27/2024 .500 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 100.000000 10,000,000.00 0.00FHLB 5YrNc1Mo 09/28/2026 1.040 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 100.000000 15,000,000.00 0.00FHLB 3YrNc3MoQ 09/30/2024 .570 20,000,000.00 19,988,000.00 99.940000 19,988,000.00 0.00FHLB 5YrNc3MoQ 09/30/2026 1.000 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.679000 9,867,900.00 -132,100.00FHLB 4.91YrNc2MoQ 11/24/2026 1.500 20,000,000.00 19,997,000.00 99.985000 19,997,000.00 0.00FHLB 2Yr 12/22/2023 .625 25,000,000.00 24,945,000.00 99.777000 24,944,250.00 -750.00FHLB 5 Yr 12/21/2026 1.250 10,000,000.00 9,972,990.00 99.912000 9,991,200.00 18,210.00FHLB 2.5YrNc1MoM 06/28/2024 1.000 25,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 100.000000 25,000,000.00 0.00FHLB 1.5YrNc3MoQ 06/30/2023 .500 50,000,000.00 50,000,000.00 100.000000 50,000,000.00 0.00FHLB 1.5YrNc3MoQ 06/30/2023 .500 50,000,000.00 50,000,000.00 100.000000 50,000,000.00 0.00

.731 933,921,250.00 933,386,861.56 99.122234 925,723,604.34 -7,663,257.22


.057 92,000,000.00 91,962,385.55 99.985141 91,986,330.00 23,944.45

FFCB 5Yr 04/11/2023 2.700 10,000,000.00 9,990,300.00 103.082000 10,308,200.00 317,900.00FFCB 5Yr 10/02/2023 3.050 10,000,000.00 9,979,300.00 104.557000 10,455,700.00 476,400.00

1725: FHLB-Fxd-S 30/360

3130ANE483130ANMH0

3130ANRB83130ANX88

1700: FHLB-DISC NOTE

1720: FHLB-Fxd-Q 30/360

3130ANBX7

3130ALGJ7

3130ALFW9

3130ALH563130ALHZ0


1925: FFCB-Fxd-S 30/360

3130AQF573130AQF65

3130ANFD7

3130APWW1

3135G06F5

3130ALKF03130ALKF0

3130ALWL4

3130AMJN3

313382AX1

3130ALLP7

3130AQ7C1

313313WR5

3133EJKN83133EJD48

3130AMEN8

3130AMME9

3130ANAJ9

3130AQ6U2

3130AMKB7

3130ANPF1

3130AMMZ2

3130AKL79

3130ALBX1

3130AKKF2

3130AKKP0

3130AMT69

3130AKLB0

3130ALGJ7

3130ALGJ73130ALGJ7

3130AL6K5

3130ALNK6

3130ALN34

3130ALGJ7

3130ALGJ7

3130ALTH7

3130ALHG2

4.519.553.500 2.713

2.933

1.495

4.616

4.603

1.241

.747 3.210

1.2772.721

.057 .180 .180.070 .358

.129

.359.050 .129

3.275

.060 .068

1.000 2.455 2.493

.068

.500 1.4951.496

.736 1.958 1.9751.306 4.803 4.975

.500

4.7511.503 4.698 4.901

1.496

2.742

.590 2.721 2.7511.040 4.745

4.630

2.964

1.100 4.490 4.638

1.000 4.520 4.6554.655

4.440 4.5731.000 4.462

1.000 4.517 4.652

4.5974.495

1.000

4.331 4.4441.000 4.426 4.5591.000 4.440 4.573

1.000

4.287 4.4031.000 4.293 4.4031.030 4.290 4.403

1.050

3.220 3.271.702 3.166 3.211.051 .088 .088

.720

3.448 3.499.375 2.256 2.271.750

3.233.688 3.166 3.211.510 2.724 2.751

.625 3.191

3.230.625 3.191 3.233.625 3.191 3.233

.700 3.183

4.2271.000 4.119 4.2271.000 4.119 4.227

1.000 4.119

4.119 4.2271.015 4.118 4.2271.000 4.119 4.227

1.000

4.132 4.214.790

4.119 4.2271.000 4.119 4.2271.000.750

.750 4.132 4.2144.127 4.214

.530

.750 4.132 4.214

.850

3.427 3.466

4.064

4.060 4.159.700 4.132 4.208

.580

4.156

4.086 4.156.550

.400 2.882 2.907

.790 4.064

.5004.081

.279

4.1513.360

4.065.580

2.482 2.493

2.232.260

2.2412.482 2.493

.805 .8051.975

.250 1.985

.260

.270 2.232 2.241

.235

2.716 1.160 1.189

1.992

.500 2.913 2.942

.176

4.808 5.0001.5001.500 4.808 5.000

4.7451.024 4.401 4.5061.040 4.633

4.4881.020 4.407 4.5151.050 4.380

4.5531.000 4.335 4.4381.130 4.434

4.2331.070 4.378 4.488.850 4.156

.128 .440 .441.128 .440 .441

.707 3.021 3.065

.310 1.867 1.877

.500 3.446 3.482

.420 2.623 2.647

.600 3.847 3.904

1.970

3.095

4.137.615

3.395

.790 4.156

3.6523.602

1.682 1.753

1.000

1.000

3130AP5M33130APBH7

1.000

3130ANTS9

3130ANYN4

3130APAD7

3130AKLB0

3130ALKL7

3135GA4R9

3130ALDX93130ALFN9

3130ANSC5

3130ALEH3

3130AQAQ6

3130ALTJ3

3130ALGJ7

3135GA3Z2

3130AMWT53130AN3B4

3130ALH56

3130ALLP7

3130ANAJ9

313313SF6313313TD0

3130ALEM2

3130ALGR9

3130ALU93

3130ALGJ7

3130AQAY9

313385XX9

3130ALEM2

3130AKKF2

3130AK3T1

3135GAAZ4

1710: FHLB-Fxd-M 30/360

3130AN3R93130AMS52

3130AL2G8

3130ALF25

3130AKDH6


68


Coupon ParValue

BookValue

MarketPrice

MarketValue

UnrealizedGain/Loss

YieldTo Mat

ModifiedDuration

Years ToMaturity


CUSIP

FFCB 4.9Yr 09/17/2024 1.600 6,128,000.00 6,107,471.20 101.751000 6,235,301.28 127,830.08FFCB 4.9Yr 09/10/2024 2.080 2,064,000.00 2,101,585.44 103.571000 2,137,705.44 36,120.00FFCB 4YrNc2YrA 02/28/2024 1.550 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 100.172000 5,008,600.00 8,600.00FFCB 5YrNc2YrA 06/10/2025 .680 5,025,000.00 5,025,000.00 98.056000 4,927,314.00 -97,686.00FFCB 3YrNc1YrA 08/10/2023 .320 15,945,000.00 15,945,000.00 99.482000 15,862,404.90 -82,595.10FFCB 2.5YrNc3MoA 03/15/2023 .220 10,000,000.00 9,992,500.00 99.843000 9,984,300.00 -8,200.00FFCB 3YrNC2YrA 10/20/2023 .270 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.536000 9,953,600.00 -46,400.00FFCB 3YrNc1YrA 11/30/2023 .310 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.223000 9,922,300.00 -77,700.00FFCB 3YrNc2YrA 12/08/2023 .280 9,931,000.00 9,935,667.57 99.436000 9,874,989.16 -60,678.41FFCB 2.5YrNc6MoA 06/15/2023 .200 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 99.662000 14,949,300.00 -50,700.00FFCB 2YrNc1YrA 12/15/2022 .160 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.881000 9,988,100.00 -11,900.00FFCB 2YrNc1YrA 12/15/2022 .160 8,245,000.00 8,245,000.00 99.881000 8,235,188.45 -9,811.55FFCB 3YrNc1YrA 12/21/2023 .210 10,000,000.00 9,992,500.00 99.160000 9,916,000.00 -76,500.00FFCB 2.75YrNc6MoA 09/22/2023 .190 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.483000 9,948,300.00 -51,700.00FFCB 4YrNc6MoA 12/23/2024 .320 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 98.048000 4,902,400.00 -97,600.00FFCB 3YrNC1YrA 12/21/2023 .210 20,000,000.00 19,985,000.00 99.160000 19,832,000.00 -153,000.00FFCB 4YrNc6MoA 12/23/2024 .320 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 98.048000 14,707,200.00 -292,800.00FFCB 5YrNc6MoA 12/23/2025 .500 12,430,000.00 12,426,271.00 97.110000 12,070,773.00 -355,498.00FFCB 3.25YrNc6MoA 03/28/2024 .270 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.843000 9,884,300.00 -115,700.00FFCB 4YrNc6MoA 12/23/2024 .320 10,000,000.00 9,992,500.00 98.048000 9,804,800.00 -187,700.00FFCB 1.75YrNc6MoA 09/22/2022 .120 15,000,000.00 14,991,000.00 99.903000 14,985,450.00 -5,550.00FFCB 3YrNC1YrA 12/28/2023 .210 15,000,000.00 14,988,750.00 98.964000 14,844,600.00 -144,150.00FFCB 3.9YrNc1.9YrA 12/28/2023 .210 10,000,000.00 9,990,000.00 98.964000 9,896,400.00 -93,600.00FFCB 2Yr 01/12/2023 .120 25,000,000.00 24,997,500.00 99.703000 24,925,750.00 -71,750.00FFCB 4rNC1YrA 03/03/2025 .480 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 98.141000 4,907,050.00 -92,950.00FFCB 4YrNC1YrA 03/03/2025 .480 10,000,000.00 9,987,500.00 98.141000 9,814,100.00 -173,400.00FFCB 3Yr 03/18/2024 .300 25,000,000.00 24,994,675.00 99.395000 24,848,750.00 -145,925.00FHLB 4YrNc1YrA 04/01/2025 .710 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.704000 9,870,400.00 -129,600.00FFCB 4YrNc1YrA 04/01/2025 .710 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.704000 9,870,400.00 -129,600.00FFCB 3YrNC1YrA 04/05/2024 .330 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.810000 9,881,000.00 -119,000.00FFCB 1Yr 05/17/2022 .060 50,000,000.00 49,998,575.00 99.979000 49,989,500.00 -9,075.00FFCB 5YrNc2YrA 05/18/2026 .900 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 98.768000 4,938,400.00 -61,600.00FFCB 5YrNc6MoA 07/13/2026 .990 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 100.000000 10,000,000.00 0.00FFCB 5YrNc6MoA 07/13/2026 .990 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 100.000000 10,000,000.00 0.00FFCB 4.9YrNC11YrA 10/20/2026 1.140 10,000,000.00 9,947,500.00 99.475000 9,947,500.00 0.00FFCB 4.91YrNC11MOA 10/20/2026 1.140 10,000,000.00 9,905,000.00 99.050000 9,905,000.00 0.00FFCB 5YrNC1YrA 11/23/2026 1.430 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.901000 9,990,100.00 -9,900.00FFCB 1.5Yr 05/23/2023 .375 50,000,000.00 49,939,500.00 99.879000 49,939,500.00 0.00FFCB 3YrNc1YrA 12/09/2024 .970 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 100.000000 10,000,000.00 0.00

.513 519,768,000.00 519,458,095.21 99.556471 517,462,676.23 -1,995,418.98

FAMCA 4.9Yr 06/30/2023 2.850 10,000,000.00 9,947,900.00 103.374000 10,337,400.00 389,500.002.850 10,000,000.00 9,947,900.00 103.374000 10,337,400.00 389,500.00

STATE OF HAWAII 01/01/2022 2.770 3,500,000.00 3,500,000.00 100.000000 3,500,000.00 0.00SIER JT COM GO 08/01/2024 .354 720,000.00 720,000.00 100.000000 720,000.00 0.00SIER JT COM GO 08/01/2024 .344 500,000.00 500,000.00 100.000000 500,000.00 0.00SIER JT COM GO 08/01/2023 .229 260,000.00 260,000.00 100.000000 260,000.00 0.00SIER JT COM GO 08/01/2022 .179 205,000.00 205,000.00 100.000000 205,000.00 0.00SIER JT COM GO 08/01/2022 .179 260,000.00 260,000.00 100.000000 260,000.00 0.00SANTA CLARA USD GO 07/01/2022 .160 8,770,000.00 8,770,000.00 100.000000 8,770,000.00 0.00SANTA CLARA USD GO 07/01/2023 .210 2,870,000.00 2,870,000.00 100.000000 2,870,000.00 0.00SAN DIEGUITO USD GO 08/01/2022 .175 425,000.00 425,000.00 100.000000 425,000.00 0.00SAN DIEGUITO USD GO 08/01/2023 .275 425,000.00 425,000.00 100.000000 425,000.00 0.00SAN DIEGUITO USD GO 08/01/2023 .275 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 100.000000 1,000,000.00 0.00SAN DIEGUITO USD GO 08/01/2022 .175 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 100.000000 1,000,000.00 0.00CITY CNT SAN FRANSISCO GO 06/15/2022 .250 29,250,000.00 29,277,495.00 100.094000 29,277,495.00 0.00OCESCD UNS GO 08/01/2022 .290 125,000.00 125,000.00 100.000000 125,000.00 0.00

STATE OF WASHINGTON GO 08/01/2024 .470 14,995,000.00 14,995,000.00 100.000000 14,995,000.00 0.00


SANTA MONICA-MALIBU USD GO 08/01/2025 .669 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 100.000000 1,000,000.00 0.00SANTA MONICA-MALIBU USD GO 08/01/2024 .396 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 100.000000 1,000,000.00 0.00MARIN CMNTY CLG GO 08/01/2025 .763 1,065,000.00 1,065,000.00 100.000000 1,065,000.00 0.00MARIN CMNTY CLG GO 08/01/2022 .176 990,000.00 990,000.00 100.000000 990,000.00 0.00

SAN MATEO USD GO 09/01/2023 .256 500,000.00 500,000.00 100.000000 500,000.00 0.00SAN MATEO USD GO 09/01/2022 .166 500,000.00 500,000.00 100.000000 500,000.00 0.00HAWAII STATE 10/01/2022 .247 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 100.000000 10,000,000.00 0.00HAWAII STATE 10/01/2023 .422 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 100.000000 10,000,000.00 0.00HAWAII STATE 10/01/2024 .713 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 100.000000 10,000,000.00 0.00HAWAII STATE 10/01/2025 2.750 12,775,000.00 13,625,815.00 106.660000 13,625,815.00 0.00HAWAII STATE 10/01/2022 .247 2,305,000.00 2,305,000.00 100.000000 2,305,000.00 0.00HAWAII STATE 10/01/2023 .422 3,260,000.00 3,260,000.00 100.000000 3,260,000.00 0.00HAWAII STATE 10/01/2024 .713 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00 100.000000 2,500,000.00 0.00HAWAII STATE 10/01/2025 1.033 3,660,000.00 3,660,000.00 100.000000 3,660,000.00 0.00HAWAII STATE 02/01/2022 .247 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 100.000000 5,000,000.00 0.00HAWAII STATE 08/01/2022 .247 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 100.000000 10,000,000.00 0.00HAWAII STATE 08/01/2023 .422 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 100.000000 15,000,000.00 0.00HAWAII STATE 08/01/2024 .713 9,000,000.00 9,000,000.00 100.000000 9,000,000.00 0.00HAWAII STATE 08/01/2025 1.033 6,250,000.00 6,250,000.00 100.000000 6,250,000.00 0.00SAN DIEGO USD GO 01/01/2022 .160 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00 100.000000 2,500,000.00 0.00SAN DIEGO USD GO 01/01/2022 .160 5,120,000.00 5,120,000.00 100.000000 5,120,000.00 0.00BEAUMONT USD GO 08/01/2025 1.109 500,000.00 500,000.00 100.000000 500,000.00 0.00BEAUMONT USD GO 08/01/2022 .278 225,000.00 225,000.00 100.000000 225,000.00 0.00BEAUMONT USD GO 08/01/2024 .690 275,000.00 275,000.00 100.000000 275,000.00 0.00SAN RAMON VLY USD GO 08/01/2022 .202 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 100.000000 1,000,000.00 0.00SAN RAMON VLY USD GO 08/01/2025 .967 4,505,000.00 4,505,000.00 100.000000 4,505,000.00 0.00LOS ANGELES CA USD GO 01/01/2022 3.000 4,000,000.00 4,015,880.00 100.397000 4,015,880.00 0.00SUNNYVALE USD GO 01/01/2022 .230 1,515,000.00 1,515,000.00 100.000000 1,515,000.00 0.00TEXTAS STATE G.O. 10/01/2024 .794 5,810,000.00 5,810,000.00 100.000000 5,810,000.00 0.00TEXTAS STATE G.O. 10/01/2023 .508 4,745,000.00 4,745,000.00 100.000000 4,745,000.00 0.00

.674 200,305,000.00 201,199,190.00 100.446414 201,199,190.00 0.00


.250 80,000,000.00 80,085,900.00 100.107375 80,085,900.00 0.00

3133EMML33133EMSC7

3133EMTW23133EMUP5

3133ENEW63133ENGN4

074437HB3

419792A55

797508JT6

826239GH2

882724XJ1

2360: MUNIS-A 30/360

923035BS7

3133EMSC7

419792A63419792A71

419792F68419792F76

3132X03B5

2350: MUNIS-S 30/360

3130AKKF2

802498YZ2

3133EMLR1

3133EMLT7

3133EMLF73133EMLT7

3133EKP75

3133EMLP53133EMKW13133EMLP5

3133EKQA7

826239FY6

419792D29

799017XT0

797508JS8

419792D37

797356DV1

802498YY5

93974ETF3

.508

.176

.247799017XS2 .166

3133EMQ62

.751

.584

3133EMLE0

56781RKQ9

802498YW9

.710

826239FW0

.229

1.4301.3403133ENBK5

.197

.794

.160

.278

797356EJ7

7994082E8

.498

3.586.003

.136

.141

.967

.495

3.586.582 .584

2.553 2.586

.131

3.508

.140

2.712

.582.202

3.586

.230

.690.584

.003

.003 .003.160

.7133.501

3.497

.088.582 .584

1.575 1.5842.551 2.586

2.753

.247

.748

.422

.713

.2471.033

3.661.088

1.033

3.557

.250

1.578

.160 .954

1.967

1.909

.582

2.249

.344

.310

.970

2.112

.235 1.967

.320

.900

1.4961.457

2.9422.090

2.964

2.1202.889

.538

1.577 1.584.175 .582

1.499.584

1.498.210

.275

.584

.499.179

.502

.582 .584

.582.160

.179

2.770 .003 .003

1.584

.354 2.5862.5862.566

2.566

2.964 1.457 1.496

4.805

.457 1.388 1.3924.704 4.8994.645

4.5341.249 4.648 4.805.990

4.381.990 4.402 4.534

4.281

4.402

2.263.063 .375 .375

3.252.710 3.202 3.252.330

3.202

3.173.512 3.139 3.173.307 2.203 2.214

3.140.480

1.992.125 1.029 1.033.244

.726.235 1.986 1.992

1.986

2.981.155 .724

3.981.270 2.232 2.241.339 2.961

1.973.320.506 3.933

1.973

2.961 2.981

.190 1.721 1.7262.981

.235

.956.160 .954 .956

2.961

.320 1.601

.264 1.929 1.937

.200 1.453 1.455

2.594 2.696

1.915

2.162.680 3.395 3.444

.270 1.796 1.803

.455

1.577.275 1.584

1.550

1.6081.202 1.203

1.672 2.630 2.7151.688

.584

.584

.175 .582

.141

.290 .582

.583

.584.454

.470 2.560

3.527

3.5863.520

2.586

3.586.669

.142

.396

3133EMVD1

3133EMLP5

3133ELNJ9

2.564 2.586

.422

.763

.256 1.661 1.668

1.740

.666 .668

.751

.247

1.740 1.7512.714

1.751.713 2.714 2.753

3.753

1.617 1.647

.003

1.109

.003

3.753

.422

.748

.003 .003

.498 .499

.498 .499

.498 .499

3133EL7E8

.499

2.753

1.033

1.739 1.751

3133EMKG6

419792C95

3133EMDM13133EMHL9

3133EMKH43133EMKH43133EMKW1

544647EC0

7994082B4074437HA5

3133EMZJ4

3133EMJQ6

419792F92

56781RKT3

3133ENEM8

3133EL3E2

419792F50

3133ELH80

3133EMZS4

1950: FMAC-Fxd-S 30/360

3133EMQ623133ENBK5

79773KGV0675383TG8

826239FX8826239GF6

8014952N18014952P6

797508HV3797508HU5

3133EMUP5

419792YL4

867578VS2

419792F84

074437GY4

419792D45

419792A89

882724XK8

923035BS7923035BS7


69


Coupon ParValue

BookValue

MarketPrice

MarketValue

UnrealizedGain/Loss

YieldTo Mat

ModifiedDuration

Years ToMaturity


CUSIP

JP MORGAN 03/28/2022 .170 50,000,000.00 49,936,250.00 99.976111 49,988,055.56 51,805.56JP MORGAN 03/28/2022 .170 50,000,000.00 49,936,250.00 99.976111 49,988,055.56 51,805.56NATL SEC CLEARING CORP 03/25/2022 .090 50,000,000.00 49,966,625.00 99.976944 49,988,472.22 21,847.22NATL SEC CLEARING CORP 03/25/2022 .090 50,000,000.00 49,966,625.00 99.976944 49,988,472.22 21,847.22NATL SEC CLEARING CORP 03/22/2022 .090 85,000,000.00 84,944,112.50 99.977778 84,981,111.11 36,998.61JP MORGAN 04/08/2022 .170 35,000,000.00 34,955,705.56 99.973056 34,990,569.44 34,863.88NATL SEC CLEARING CORP 01/25/2022 .060 90,000,000.00 89,973,600.00 99.993333 89,994,000.00 20,400.00RABOBANKNY 02/14/2022 .110 50,000,000.00 49,972,652.78 99.987778 49,993,888.89 21,236.11RABO BANK 02/15/2022 .110 50,000,000.00 49,972,652.78 99.987500 49,993,750.00 21,097.22NATL SEC CLEARING CORP 01/12/2022 .070 20,000,000.00 19,994,633.33 99.996944 19,999,388.89 4,755.56NATL SEC CLEARING CORP 01/12/2022 .070 15,000,000.00 14,996,325.00 99.996944 14,999,541.67 3,216.67APPLE 01/12/2022 .050 50,000,000.00 49,991,805.56 99.996944 49,998,472.22 6,666.66APPLE 01/21/2022 .050 40,000,000.00 39,993,166.67 99.994444 39,997,777.78 4,611.11PROCTER & GAMBLE 01/26/2022 .050 50,000,000.00 49,991,180.56 99.993056 49,996,527.78 5,347.22NATL SEC CLEARING CORP 01/12/2022 .070 20,000,000.00 19,995,877.78 99.996944 19,999,388.89 3,511.11

PROCTER & GAMBLE 01/07/2022 .050 28,500,000.00 28,496,041.67 99.998333 28,499,525.00 3,483.33APPLE 01/12/2022 .050 50,000,000.00 49,992,708.33 99.996944 49,998,472.22 5,763.89PROCTER & GAMBEL 01/10/2022 .050 50,000,000.00 49,992,847.22 99.997500 49,998,750.00 5,902.78APPLE 01/21/2022 .050 40,000,000.00 39,993,944.44 99.994444 39,997,777.78 3,833.34NATL SEC CLEARING CORP 01/26/2022 .060 40,000,000.00 39,992,400.00 99.993056 39,997,222.22 4,822.22APPLE 01/12/2022 .050 30,000,000.00 29,995,875.00 99.996944 29,999,083.33 3,208.33APPLE 01/06/2022 .050 55,000,000.00 54,993,125.00 99.998611 54,999,236.11 6,111.11PROCTER & GAMBLE 02/03/2022 .060 25,000,000.00 24,995,541.67 99.990833 24,997,708.33 2,166.66NESTLE 01/11/2022 .060 30,000,000.00 29,996,500.00 99.997222 29,999,166.67 2,666.67

ROCHE HOLDINGS 01/12/2022 .060 30,000,000.00 29,996,500.00 99.996944 29,999,083.33 2,583.33NESTLE 01/11/2022 .060 50,000,000.00 49,994,250.00 99.997222 49,998,611.11 4,361.11ROCHE HOLDINGS 01/14/2022 .060 30,000,000.00 29,996,750.00 99.996389 29,998,916.67 2,166.67ROCHE HOLDINGS 01/05/2022 .060 30,000,000.00 29,997,200.00 99.998889 29,999,666.67 2,466.67ROCHE HOLDINGS 01/10/2022 .050 30,000,000.00 29,997,541.67 99.997500 29,999,250.00 1,708.33JP MORGAN 01/18/2022 .120 50,000,000.00 49,989,333.33 99.995278 49,997,638.89 8,305.56JP MORGAN 01/24/2022 .120 90,000,000.00 89,979,300.00 99.993611 89,994,250.00 14,950.00APPLE 01/27/2022 .050 9,440,000.00 9,439,095.33 99.992778 9,439,318.22 222.89AMAZON 05/12/2022 .080 10,000,000.00 9,996,444.44 99.963611 9,996,361.11 -83.33TOYOTA MOTOR CORP 01/19/2022 .100 50,000,000.00 49,993,888.89 99.995000 49,997,500.00 3,611.11AMAZON 05/18/2022 .080 25,000,000.00 24,990,944.44 99.961944 24,990,486.11 -458.33PEFCO 05/09/2022 .120 25,000,000.00 24,987,333.33 99.964444 24,991,111.11 3,777.78JP MORGAN 01/12/2022 .120 40,000,000.00 39,995,333.33 99.996944 39,998,777.78 3,444.45TOYOTA MOTOR CORP 01/20/2022 .090 30,000,000.00 29,996,850.00 99.994722 29,998,416.67 1,566.67PEFCO 05/06/2022 .120 25,000,000.00 24,987,666.67 99.965278 24,991,319.44 3,652.77TOYOTA MOTOR CORP 01/26/2022 .110 30,000,000.00 29,995,966.67 99.993056 29,997,916.67 1,950.00PEFCO 05/12/2022 .130 25,000,000.00 24,986,458.33 99.963611 24,990,902.78 4,444.45APPLE 01/31/2022 .060 20,000,000.00 19,998,400.00 99.991667 19,998,333.33 -66.67

APPLE 01/31/2022 .060 20,000,000.00 19,998,466.67 99.991667 19,998,333.33 -133.34

JOHNSON & JOHNSON 05/17/2022 .100 47,000,000.00 46,980,286.11 99.962222 46,982,244.44 1,958.33JOHNSON & JOHNSON 05/16/2022 .100 47,000,000.00 46,980,416.67 99.962500 46,982,375.00 1,958.33

JOHNSON & JOHNSON 05/17/2022 .100 48,000,000.00 47,979,866.67 99.962222 47,981,866.67 2,000.00ARCHER DANIELS MIDLAND 01/12/2022 .060 50,000,000.00 49,998,750.00 99.996944 49,998,472.22 -277.78

.086 1,864,940,000.00 1,864,293,488.40 99.987429 1,864,705,565.44 412,077.04

BMO YCD 01/03/2022 .190 60,000,000.00 60,000,000.00 100.000000 60,000,000.00 0.00BMO 01/10/2022 .150 25,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 100.000000 25,000,000.00 0.00ROYAL BANK OF CANADA 02/22/2022 .130 50,000,000.00 50,000,000.00 100.000000 50,000,000.00 0.00ROYAL BANK OF CANADA 03/22/2022 .130 50,000,000.00 50,000,000.00 100.000000 50,000,000.00 0.00ROYAL BANK OF CANADA 04/18/2022 .150 50,000,000.00 50,000,000.00 100.000000 50,000,000.00 0.00ROYAL BANK OF CANADA 05/06/2022 .160 45,000,000.00 45,000,000.00 100.000000 45,000,000.00 0.00NORDEA BK 02/22/2022 .130 50,000,000.00 50,000,000.00 100.000000 50,000,000.00 0.00NORDEA BK 02/22/2022 .130 50,000,000.00 50,000,000.00 100.000000 50,000,000.00 0.00TD YCD 05/16/2022 .170 55,000,000.00 55,000,000.00 100.000000 55,000,000.00 0.00TORONTO DOMINION 01/20/2022 .110 20,000,000.00 20,000,000.00 100.000000 20,000,000.00 0.00NORDEA BK 03/09/2022 .140 30,000,000.00 29,999,998.84 99.999996 29,999,998.84 0.00RABOBANK YCD 05/10/2022 .200 30,000,000.00 30,008,603.09 100.028677 30,008,603.09 0.00BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA 04/07/2022 .230 2,200,000.00 2,200,963.86 100.043812 2,200,963.86 0.00TORONTO DOMINION 01/24/2022 .100 25,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 100.000000 25,000,000.00 0.00ROYAL BANK OF CANADA 05/16/2022 .160 25,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 100.000000 25,000,000.00 0.00TORONTO DOMINION 06/13/2022 .150 30,000,000.00 30,000,000.00 100.000000 30,000,000.00 0.00BMO YCD 06/23/2022 .150 55,000,000.00 55,000,000.00 100.000000 55,000,000.00 0.00BMO YCD 05/05/2022 .160 50,000,000.00 50,000,000.00 100.000000 50,000,000.00 0.00TORONTO DOMINION 07/08/2022 .200 45,000,000.00 45,000,000.00 100.000000 45,000,000.00 0.00BANK OF MONTREAL YCD 07/18/2022 .210 25,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 100.000000 25,000,000.00 0.00BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA 04/13/2022 .220 8,200,000.00 8,201,926.72 100.023497 8,201,926.72 0.00TORONTO DOMINION YCD 10/27/2022 .300 45,000,000.00 45,000,000.00 100.000000 45,000,000.00 0.00TORONTO DOMINION 11/03/2022 .310 55,000,000.00 55,000,000.00 100.000000 55,000,000.00 0.00TORONTO DOMINION 09/29/2022 .280 55,000,000.00 55,000,000.00 100.000000 55,000,000.00 0.00BANK OF MONTREAL 01/31/2022 .110 55,000,000.00 55,000,000.00 100.000000 55,000,000.00 0.00SVENSKA HANDEL 03/03/2022 .155 8,000,000.00 8,000,121.68 100.001521 8,000,121.68 0.00SVENSKA HANDEL 05/12/2022 .205 50,000,000.00 50,001,235.00 100.002470 50,001,235.00 0.00Svenska Handelsbanken YCD 08/12/2022 .280 50,000,000.00 50,000,000.00 100.000000 50,000,000.00 0.00RABOBANK YCD 07/14/2022 .240 50,000,000.00 50,000,000.00 100.000000 50,000,000.00 0.00RABOBANK YCD 08/12/2022 .270 50,000,000.00 50,000,000.00 100.000000 50,000,000.00 0.00ROYAL BANK OF CANADA YCD 11/17/2022 .380 50,000,000.00 50,000,000.00 100.000000 50,000,000.00 0.00ROYAL BANK OF CANADA YCD 10/18/2022 .340 50,000,000.00 50,000,000.00 100.000000 50,000,000.00 0.00BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA 02/16/2022 .150 130,000,000.00 130,000,000.00 100.000000 130,000,000.00 0.00SVENSKA HANDEL 02/17/2022 .135 50,000,000.00 50,000,624.80 100.001250 50,000,624.80 0.00BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA 03/18/2022 .160 25,000,000.00 24,999,991.75 99.999967 24,999,991.75 0.00NORDEA BK YCD 08/19/2022 .330 50,000,000.00 50,000,000.00 100.000000 50,000,000.00 0.00TORONTO DOMINION YCD 11/10/2022 .430 75,000,000.00 75,000,000.00 100.000000 75,000,000.00 0.00ROYAL BANK OF CANADA YCD 11/08/2022 .450 75,000,000.00 75,000,000.00 100.000000 75,000,000.00 0.00BANK OF MONTREAL YCD 09/02/2022 .410 30,000,000.00 30,000,000.00 100.000000 30,000,000.00 0.00SVENSKA HANDEL 03/08/2022 .155 100,000,000.00 100,001,249.53 100.001250 100,001,249.53 0.00BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA 03/22/2022 .220 50,000,000.00 49,999,999.81 100.000000 49,999,999.81 0.00RABO BANK YCD 09/06/2022 .380 30,000,000.00 30,000,000.00 100.000000 30,000,000.00 0.00SVENSKA HANDEL 09/02/2022 .310 60,000,000.00 60,004,423.53 100.007373 60,004,423.53 0.00TORONTO DOMINION 09/06/2022 .370 20,000,000.00 20,000,000.00 100.000000 20,000,000.00 0.00BANK OF MONTREAL 03/10/2022 .150 30,000,000.00 30,000,000.00 100.000000 30,000,000.00 0.00ROYAL BANK OF CANADA 09/09/2022 .360 25,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 100.000000 25,000,000.00 0.00TORONTO DOMINION 11/21/2022 .430 30,000,000.00 30,000,000.00 100.000000 30,000,000.00 0.00ROYAL BANK OF CANADA 11/21/2022 .500 25,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 100.000000 25,000,000.00 0.00BANK OF MONTREAL YCD 09/16/2022 .380 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 100.000000 15,000,000.00 0.00TORONTO DOMINION YCD 11/22/2022 .440 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 100.000000 15,000,000.00 0.00

.235 2,133,400,000.00 2,133,419,138.61 100.000897 2,133,419,138.61 0.004510: NCD-Var-SOFR-M A/360

89114WNL5 .440 .889 .893.233 .439 .440

78012U2T1 .500 .885 .89006367CQX8 .380 .706 .710

78012U2M6 .360 .687 .69089114WNE1 .430 .886 .890

89114WMR3 .370 .679 .68206367CPX9 .150 .189 .189

86959RVS6

21684XUJ386959RVT4 .300 .669 .671

21684XUA2

78012UZ5778012UZ40

86959RUZ106417MSS5

06367CPR2

.841

.150 .169 .170

.280 .743 .745

.110

06417MNM3 .170 .282 .282

.085 .085

89114WJP1 .300 .819 .822

.200 .516 .51806367CME489114WHT506367CMV6 .210 .544 .545

06367CM53 .150 .476 .477.160 .342 .342

.160 .372 .37378012UU2989114WG41 .150 .448 .449

06417MNJ0 .160 .265 .266.100 .066 .066

65558UEU2 .140 .186 .18621684XQS8 .160 .355 .356

89114WEK7 .170 .372 .37389114WEM3 .110 .055 .055

65558UFJ6 .130 .145 .14565558UFJ6 .130 .145 .145

78012UQ73 .150 .295

78012UQ57

.29678012UR80 .160 .344 .345

74271UB33

46640QCU363763QCR6

06367CE5206367CEJ2

78012UQ65

46640QAC589233HAL8

4500: NCD-Mat A/360

74271UAS963763QAC1

3020: COMMERCIAL PAPER

7426M5E67 .120 .345 .34589233HAS3

.120 .033 .033

.071 .071

.090 .055 .055

.080 .378 .3787426M3E96 .120 .353 .353

.080 .361 .362

.100 .052 .052

.120 .066 .06603785EAT1 .050 .074 .074

.050 .027 .027

.120 .049 .049

.060 .014 .014

03785EAC803785EA61

.060 .038 .03864105HAB8

.060 .033 .033

.060 .030 .030

.060 .093 .093

.060 .030 .030

.050 .033 .033

.050 .016 .016

.027.050 .057 .058

63763QAS6 .060 .071 .07103785EAM6

.050 .019 .019

74271UAA8.050 .033 .03303785EAC8.050 .027

63763QAC1

03785EAC8

63763QCR6

46640QCU3

.050 .033

.090 .230

21687BBF7

.050 .071 .071

.070 .033 .033

.03363763QAC1

.050 .057 .058

.070 .033 .033

.070 .033 .033

21687BBE0.110 .126 .126

.060 .068 .068

.110 .123 .123

63763QCN5 .090 .222 .222.170 .268 .26846640QD81

63763QAR8

.230.090 .230 .230

.238 .238.170 .238 .238.170

74271UA75

89233HAK002314QEJ4

64105HAB8

77119MAC1

77119MAE777119MA56

46640QAQ4

02314QEC9

.130 .361 .36203785EAX2 .060 .085 .085

.110

03785EAX2 .060 .085 .085

47816GEH8 .100 .375 .375

7426M3EC9

.127

47816GEG0 .100 .372 .373

47816GEH8 .100 .375 .375

.190 .008

.060 .033 .033.086 .127

.008

.130 .221 .222

.150 .027 .027

.130 .145 .145

77119MAA546640QAJ0

89114WEW1

03948HAC5

03785EAM6

89114WKA289114WKC8

86959RSF886959RUS7 .200 .361

.310 .838

06367CNJ2

.362.280 .612 .614.240 .533 .534

86959RUX6

21684XUB0 .270 .612 .614.380 .876 .879.340 .794 .797

06417MSV8 .150 .129 .129.130 .131 .132.160 .211 .211

65558UJZ6 .330 .630 .63389114WMP7 .430 .856 .860

.222 .222

78012U2K0 .450 .850 .855.410 .668 .671

.380 .679 .682

.150 .183 .18406417MUC7 .220


70


Coupon ParValue

BookValue

MarketPrice

MarketValue

UnrealizedGain/Loss

YieldTo Mat

ModifiedDuration

Years ToMaturity


CUSIP



IBRD5 M ZERO 05/16/2022 .090 50,000,000.00 49,980,000.00 99.948000 49,974,000.00 -6,000.00IBRD4 M ZERO 04/29/2022 .090 25,000,000.00 24,991,687.50 99.971000 24,992,750.00 1,062.50IBRD8 M ZERO 08/31/2022 .160 25,000,000.00 24,971,444.44 99.842000 24,960,500.00 -10,944.44

.108 100,000,000.00 99,943,131.94 99.927250 99,927,250.00 -15,881.94


.457 75,000,000.00 74,918,675.00 99.278233 74,458,675.00 -460,000.00

.306 11,248,858,477.09 11,247,581,460.79 99.734618 11,219,005,977.66 -28,575,483.13

.306 11,248,858,477.09 11,247,581,460.79 99.734618 11,219,005,977.66 -28,575,483.13Grand Total .296 1.103 1.118

Total Fund .296 1.103 1.118

45950VQL3 .719 2.792 2.830.493 2.709 2.736

45950VPQ3 .273 2.629 2.64445950VQG4 .484 2.705 2.732

.108 .433 .4346040: IFC-Fxd-S 30/360

459053WD2 .090 .326 .326459053D92 .160 .664 .666

5025: IBRD-DISC NTE459053WW0 .090 .372 .373

06417MRX5 .160 .519 .518.160 .519 .518

.140 .375 .3734520: NCD-Var-SOFR-Q A/360

06417MSB2 .140 .375 .373


71


CAPITAL MARKETS




72


AGENDA ITEM 6E

BLANK

Agenda Item 6E


DATE: March 7, 2022


FROM: Executive Committee Angela Ferreira, Senior Management Analyst Hector Casillas, Right of Way Manager


SUBJECT: Acquisitions Status Report

EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Board of Directors to receive and file the acquisitions status report as of December 31, 2021. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The Board of Directors requested the Right of Way Department to provide a monthly report of the status of various acquisitions. Since RCTC became the managing agency for RCA on January 1, 2021, 18 parcels closed escrow and 49 new parcels began the acquisition process. As of December 31, 2021, staff is managing 46 active parcels. In the 2021 calendar year, 18 parcels were acquired which add up to approximately 891 acres. In addition to the typical acquisition type, i.e., willing seller, grant, and Habitat Acquisition Negotiation Strategy (HANS), 12 parcels have been acquired through the tax sale process adding approximately 402 acres. Staff also completed two donations, adding approximately 38 acres. In summary, since RCTC became managing agency for RCA in 2021, it has added a total of 1,331 acres to the reserve. For comparison purposes, in the 2020 calendar year, 16 parcels closed escrow, adding approximately 646 acres. In addition, four donations of approximately 47 acres were completed. In summary, RCA added a total of 693 acres to the reserve in 2020. The first attachment provides individual property details by type including location, owner representative, and acreage for active parcels as of December 31, 2021. The parcels are listed by the proposed close escrow date, if applicable. The second attachment provides a summary of the closed escrows for the month of December 2021.

73

Agenda Item 6E

Chart 1 illustrates the active parcels by type of acquisition: grant-funded, development HANS, non-development HANS, and willing seller.

Chart 1: Active Parcels by Type

FISCAL IMPACT: This item is for informational purposes only. There is no fiscal impact. Attachments: 1) Status of Right of Way Acquisitions as of December 31, 2021 2) Closed Escrows for December 2021


Grants30%

Willing Seller44%

Development HANS15%

Non Development HANS11%

74

R22492 Hemet District 3 N/A 9.74 acresR22309 Hemet District 3 Ed Sauls 40.39 acresR22494 Murrieta District 3 N/A 35.08 acresR22497 Hemet District 3 Barry Lall 10.04 acresR22505 Barth District 1 Dave Asmus 19.92 acresR22171 Hemet District 3 Dan Hollingsworth 65.18 acresR22469 Murrieta District 1 Chris Basilevac 20.37 acesR22471 Tenaja District 1 Chris Basilevac 20.18 acresR22470 Tenaja District 1 Chris Basilevac 51.76 acresR22479 Jurupa Valley District 2 N/A 3.34 acresR22480 Jurupa Valley District 2 N/A 3.34 acresR22481 Jurupa Valley District 2 N/A 12.55 acresR22486 Jurupa Valley District 2 N/A 20 acresR22487 Jurupa Valley District 2 N/A 55.3 acres

R22475 Sage District 3 Garret Sauls 20.4 acresR22502 Hemet District 3 N/A 40.52 acresR22476 Corona District 1 Garret Sauls 17.23 acres R22474 Hemet District 3 Garret Sauls 20.72 acresR22424 Temescal Canyon District 1 Ed Sauls 420.78 acresR22217 Sage District 3 N/A 29.41 acresR22503 Corona District 1 Chad Miller 24.80 acres

R22440 Sage District 3 John Culton/Garret Sauls 322.00 acresR22407 Nuevo District 5 Ed Sauls 7.92 acresR22419 Aguanga District 3 Garret Sauls 80.00 acresR22409 Murrieta District 3 Ed Sauls 40.00 acresR22449 Gavilan Hills District 1 Ed Sauls 197.55 acres

Non-Development HANS

Western Riverside County Regional Conservation AuthorityStatus of Acquisitions

As of December 31, 2021

Grants

Development HANS

Project Number Location Owner Representative

Supervisorial District Acreage

ATTACHMENT 1

75

R22472 Temecula District 3 Garret Sauls 22.88 acresR22421 Calimesa District 5 Jason Bennecke 306.93 acresR22489 Temecula District 1 Brian Bush 16.37 acres R22433 Lake Elsinore District 1 Ecosystem Investment Partner 239.87 acresR22453 Murrieta District 3 N/A 4.02 acresR22491 Lake Elsinore District 1 Ed Sauls 129.87 acresR22495 Corona District 1 N/A 80.00 acresR22496 Murrieta District 3 Sam Yoo 20.00 acresR22500 Temecula District 3 Katherine Jankowski 20.02 acresR22501 Lake Elsinore District 1 Rudolph Lacayo 5 acresR22504 Corona District 1 N/A 17.98 acresR22507 Perris District 1 Larry Robillard 160 acres R22509 Hemet Distrcit 3 Joe Valdez 75.56 acresR22510 Murrieta District 3 Ed Sauls 8.06 acresR22511 Lake Elsinore District 1 Ecosystem Investment Partner 44.70 acresR22512 Lake Elsinore District 1 Garret Sauls 30 acresR22513 Nuevo District 5 Garret Sauls 217 acresR22514 Wildomar District 1 Ed Sauls 19.25 acresR22515 Sage District 3 George Haines 4.91 acresR22516 Murrieta Distrcit 1 N/A 8.54 acres

Willing Seller

76

§̈¦215

RIVERSIDE BEAUMONT

SANJACINTO

MORENO VALLEY

PERRIS

MURRIETA

CORONA

NORCO

LAKEELSINORE

TEMECULA

CALIMESA

BANNING

CANYON LAKE

EASTVALE

MENIFEE

JURUPA VALLEY

WILDOMAR

HEMET

ÄÄ371

ÄÄ243

§̈¦15

ÄÄ79

ÄÄ91

ÄÄ60

ÄÄ71

ÄÄ74

MCCURRY/FLEEMAN

Orange County

San Diego County

San Bernardino County

I 0 5 10 Miles

1/19/2022

December 2021 Acqusition

RCA MSHCP Conserved Land

RCA Conservation Easement

Public/Quasi-Public Conserved Land

WRC Non RCA Conservation Easement

Criteria Cell

City Boundary

MSHCP Boundary

Water Body

Highway

Acquisitions For the Month of December 2021

+21 Acres

Text

Total Conserved Lands (including PQP) 411,126 Acres

G:\R

CA\

CLO

SED

_SE

SSIO

N_M

APS

\CLO

SED

_ES

CR

OW

S_B

Y_M

ON

TH\L

and

Acqu

isiti

on M

ap fo

r the

Mon

th o

f Dec

embe

r 202

1.m

xd

ATTACHMENT 2

AcresTotal ARL As of November 30, 2021 64,105 McCurry/Fleeman 21 Total 64,126

77

BLANK

AGENDA ITEM 6F

BLANK

Agenda Item 6F


DATE: March 7, 2022


FROM: Executive Committee Tricia Campbell, Reserve Management and Monitoring Manager


SUBJECT: Joint Project Review Status Report

EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Board of Directors to receive and file the Joint Project Review (JPR) status report as of January 31, 2022. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Consistent with the Board’s priority on transparency and communication, staff is providing a monthly report of the status of JPRs and other Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) compliance processes. This staff report completes the status of JPRs and other MSHCP compliance processes for 2021 and provides activities in 2022 through January 31, 2022. The RCA processes Habitat Acquisition Negotiation Strategy (HANS) analyses in the form of JPRs as well as Participating Special Entity (PSE) applications and Criteria Refinements. The included attachments summarize each type of MSHCP compliance review the RCA has performed since RCTC became the managing agency on January 1, 2021. In 2021, staff completed 25 JPRs (all Development HANS), one PSE amendment, and no Criteria Refinements. In 2022, as of January 31, 2022, staff has completed one JPR (Development HANS). FISCAL IMPACT: This is an information item. There is no fiscal impact. Attachments: 1) RCA MSHCP Compliance Projects Processed in 2021 2) RCA MSHCP Compliance Project Processing from January 1, 2022, thru January 31, 2022

78

Agenda Item 6F


79

RCA MSHCP Compliance Projects Processed in 2021

Completed in 2021

DEVELOPMENT HANS1

PUBLIC PROJECTS (Total 6) Perris SJR Trail Project Temecula Pala Park RCTC SART Trail Project County Transportation Gilman Springs Road French Valley Recycling Center Amendment Westside Fire Station

PRIVATE PROJECTS (Total 19) County – 14 Temecula – 2 Lake Elsinore - 1 Murrieta – 2

NON-DEVELOPMENT HANS2

None

PARTICIPATING SPECIAL ENTITY

PUBLIC PROJECTS (Total 0)

PRIVATE PROJECTS (Total 1) Lockheed Martin Site 2 – Laborde Remedial Action Amendment

CRITERIA REFINEMENTS3

None

1 A project is proposed on the property 2 No project is proposed on the property and these HANS involve only private entities 3 Triggered when a proposed project wants to develop on lands that are described to go into the MSHCP reserve

ATTACHMENT 1

80

BLANK

RCA MSHCP Compliance Project Processing from

January 1, 2022, thru January 31, 2022

Actively in Process Completed in 2022

DEVELOPMENT HANS1

PUBLIC PROJECTS (Total 4) PUBLIC PROJECTS (Total 0) Lake Elsinore Lake Street None to date in 2022 County Waste Pedley Landfill Murrieta Creek Bridge De Luz Rd Culvert Replacement

PRIVATE PROJECTS (Total 12) PRIVATE PROJECTS (Total 1) Perris – 3 Temecula - 1 Lake Elsinore – 3 County – 3 Temecula – 2 Riverside - 1 Murrieta - 0

NON-DEVELOPMENT HANS2

None to date in 2022 None to date in 2022

PARTICIPATING SPECIAL ENTITY

PUBLIC PROJECTS (2) PUBLIC PROJECTS (Total 0) SoCal-Gas Badlands Hydrostatic

Testing ProjectNone to date in 2022

EMWD Wickerd Road Sewer Project

PRIVATE PROJECTS (Total 1) PRIVATE PROJECTS (Total 0) Lockheed Martin Site 1 – Potrero

Remedial Action AmendmentNone to date in 2022

1 A project is proposed on the property 2 No project is proposed on the property and these HANS involve only private entities

ATTACHMENT 2

81

Actively in Process Completed in 2022

CRITERIA REFINEMENTS3

PUBLIC PROJECTS (Total 1) County Waste Lamb Canyon Landfill

Expansion

PUBLIC PROJECTS (0) None to date in 2022

PRIVATE PROJECTS (Total 1) PRIVATE PROJECTS Beaumont Point Specific Plan None to date in 2022

3 Triggered when a proposed project wants to develop on lands that are described to go into the MSHCP reserve

82

AGENDA ITEM 6G

BLANK

Agenda Item 6G

WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY REGIONAL CONSERVATION AUTHORITY DATE: March 7, 2022


FROM Executive Committee Cheryl Donahue, Public Affairs Manager


SUBJECT: Quarterly Public Engagement Metrics Report, October - December 2021

EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Board of Directors to receive and file report summarizing the Quarterly Public Engagement Metrics. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The External Affairs staff has completed a full year of managing and strengthening the RCA’s public communications and education efforts. The public engagement quarterly reports are data-driven analytics designed to measure progress toward public engagement goals, analyze outreach efforts and campaigns, offer insight of audiences and their behaviors, and provide transparency of the outreach tools in use. This is the third report, following adoption of the Public Outreach Plan in April 2021. The metrics cover October-December 2021 and are a comparison to the July-September 2021 data. This report features the following data sets:

1. Metrics for website audience and behaviors 2. Metrics for social media platforms: Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram 3. Metrics for The Vista newsletter

The data is summarized below and in the attached one-page graphic. Future metrics may be added to reports as warranted. Website The goal from the Public Outreach Plan is to increase website visitors by 375 per month during 2021-22. The goal was not met this past quarter.

1. From October to December, there were 7,218 website visits, a 11% decrease from last quarter's 8,096 visits. Of these visits, 4,141 were unique users, a decrease of 9% compared to the previous quarter's 4,540 unique users.

83

Agenda Item 6G

2. Most visitors (49.8%) accessed the website organically through a search engine. Others (33.6%) used direct referrals, either by typing in the URL or accessing it through an email. This past quarter, twice as many visitors accessed the website through a social media (13.9%) channel, compared to last quarter (6.9%). Users also accessed the website through other referrals (2.7%).

3. The majority of visitors reached the website via desktop versus mobile devices. The ratio was 66% for desktop and 34% for mobile. This ratio was similar to last quarters.

4. The homepage was the most frequently visited page, followed this quarter by the RCA Maps, Existing Reserves, and Document Library pages.

Social Media The goals from the Public Outreach Plan for 2021-22 are to increase Facebook followers from 249 to 1,000, increase Twitter followers from 28 to 112, and increase Instagram followers from 149 to 450. To date, the Facebook goal has been met, and growth is occurring on Twitter and Instagram as noted below.

1. Social Media Public Sentiment: Overall sentiment was positive this past quarter. There were no instances in which comments and engagements were critical of the information that was being posted. Engagement was positive related to Species of the Month, partnership with Riverside County Parks and Recreation, and approval of the California Wildlife Conservation Board to purchase land in southwest Riverside County.

2. Facebook: As of January, the Facebook page had 1,871 followers, a 1% decrease from the previous quarter. However, this number exceeds the overall goal for the year. The page had 1,668 forms of engagement, such as likes, comments and shares, a 16% increase from last quarter. Facebook no longer uses “Impressions” as a metric and instead uses “Reach.” Facebook defines “Reach” as anyone who saw any content on the page, such as posts, stories, ads, and general information. It differs from Impressions, which counted people who viewed the content multiple times. For the past quarter, the page Reach was 18,976, a 223% increase from the previous quarter. A paid social media campaign was launched during this past quarter for the Stakeholders Committee recruitment effort. The paid ad campaign contributed to the Reach but not the engagement.

3. Twitter: The Twitter page showed a 7% gain in followers, from 47 to 65. Engagement decreased by 26%, from 255 to 188. Impressions fell by 44% from 9,000 to 5,000. Engagement and Reach declined on Twitter, with fewer posts for the quarter. In future quarters, more content will be created, along with paid boosts to expand engagement.

4. Instagram: Followers grew by 9%, from 274 to 298. Engagement decreased by 7%. Instagram, similar to Facebook, no longer uses Impressions as an engagement measurement and has switched to “Reach.” This past quarter, the Instagram Reach was 2,460, a decrease of 11% from previous quarter. Paid boosts are also planned for next quarter.

84

Agenda Item 6G

The Vista E-Newsletter The goals from the Public Outreach Plan for 2021-22 were to update the name and design of the electronic newsletter, increase the subscriber list, increase open rates to 35%, and expand the link click-throughs to 20%. At the end of the last quarter, there were 1,451 subscribers, a 2% decrease from the previous quarter metrics, but an overall significant increase from the original list of 364 contacts in January 2021. The decrease in subscribers is attributed to edits to the subscriber list to remove invalid email addresses. Only four individuals unsubscribed from the newsletter list this past quarter. There was a slight uptick in the number of email opening. On average, 25% of subscribers opened The Vista, and 7% clicked on the links. Clicks increased from 4% to 7%. Efforts are under way to increase the open rates and clicks by readers. FISCAL IMPACT: This item is for informational purposes only. There is no fiscal impact. Attachment: RCA Public Engagement Metrics, October-December 2021


85

BLANK

Public Engagement Metrics: Q4 October - December 2021

Overall Social Media Sentiment

Social Media

10/7 (+) Positive trend due to post about Species of the Month and RivCo Parks partnership11/4 (-) Negative trend due to low post activity12/1 (+) Positive trend due to engagement on Riverside Fairy Shrimp post12/20 (+) Positive trend due to Wildlife Conservation Board approval to purchase land announce-ment post

Subscribers1,451

Average Open25%

AverageClick7%

Top Pages VisitedHome Page is the #1 most visited page

2 RCA Maps

3 Existing Reserves

4 Document LibraryFollowers1,871

Engagement1,668

Reach18,976

Followers65

Engagement188

Impressions5,000

-2%

The Vista Web

7,218Number of Sessions

-11%

66% Desktop Mobile 34%

4,141 Number of Unique Users

-9%

Top Channels

Desktop vs. Mobile Users

Organic (49.9 %)

Direct (33.6%)

Social (13.9%)

Referral (2.7%)

Facebook

-1%

+7%

-26%

-44%

+16%

+223%

Followers298

Engagement353

Reach2,460

+9%

-7%

-11%

Twitter Instagram

1.00

.75

.50

.25

010/1 10/8 10/15 10/22 10/29 11/6 11/13 11/20 11/27 12/3 12/10 12/17 12/31

86

BLANK

AGENDA ITEM 6H

BLANK

Agenda Item 6H


DATE: March 7, 2022


FROM: Tricia Campbell, Reserve Management and Monitoring Manager


SUBJECT: Consultant Reports – Fiscal Year 2022 Second Quarter

STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Board of Directors to receive and file the consultant reports for Fiscal Year 2022 Second Quarter.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The RCA receives quarterly reports from three consultants that support the RCA in its Joint Project Reviews, species monitoring, and land management roles as required by the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan. The consultants are Dudek, Santa Ana Watershed Association, and Riverside County Regional Parks and Open-Space District, respectively. Attached to this staff report are the most current quarterly reports (10/01/2021 – 12/31/2021). FISCAL IMPACT: This item is for informational purposes only. There is no fiscal impact. Attachments: 1) Dudek 2) Santa Ana Watershed Association 3) Riverside County Regional Parks and Open-Space District

87

BLANK

1

CONSULTANT REPORT DUDEK

FISCAL YEAR 2022 SECOND QUARTER REPORT

Report Covers Period: October 1, 2021 – December 31, 2021

Services Provided During Current Work Period:

Joint Project Reviews As part of our ongoing duties related to Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) implementation for the Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority (RCA), Dudek continued to provide review of biological reports, analysis, and submittals related to Joint Project Reviews (JPRs) by Permittees (e.g., cities, County). Dudek reviewed, provided comments, and completed multiple JPRs for Permittees during this reporting period. During the second quarter, the following number of JPRs were completed: two in October, two in November, and one in December. This number only reflects those that were completed and finalized. There are many more JPRs that are in process across any given quarter with all responses to Permittees occurring within 14 days.

Permittee Trainings and Support Dudek assists the RCA in providing training and support to Permittees on MSHCP implementation. These training sessions are provided once a year or upon request, and include an overview of the MSHCP, RCA responsibilities, Permittee responsibilities, rough step, JPR process, required surveys and mitigation, California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) documents, changes to the MSHCP, reserve lands, and the Wildlife Agencies (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, California Department of Fish and Wildlife) role. Discussion of circumstances unique to each Permittee is also provided in the training. Due to COVID-19, no training occurred during this quarter and the training sessions have been temporarily placed on hold but are anticipated to resume in 2022. Monthly meetings with the Riverside County Environmental Programs Department (EPD) are ongoing. These meetings are a forum to discuss upcoming or ongoing County Habitat Acquisition and Negotiation Strategy (HANS)/JPRs, conservation criteria, and other Permittee requirements to facilitate MSHCP consistency. RCA and EPD meetings this quarter, in which Dudek participated, were held on November 3 and December 1, 2021. Additional separate meetings or conference calls were held with RCA, Dudek, Wildlife Agencies, Permittees and/or applicants and their consultants including, but not limited to, WM Lyles, DNBA Property, Overland Bridge at Murrieta Creek, Temescal Valley Commerce Center, and San Jacinto River Levee Stage 3. Dudek also has numerous calls each week with applicants/biologists for projects regarding MSHCP implementation and compliance questions. Dudek fields questions on an ongoing basis related to new projects, ongoing projects, and/or past projects, both inside and out of the criteria area. Dudek also provides assistance regarding how the MSHCP review process works in coordination with the CEQA process.

ATTACHMENT 1

88

2

Pre-Application Meetings Dudek also attended a Pre-Application Meeting with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Regional Water Quality Control Board, California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) staff. Projects represented by Permittees and/or the project representatives are presented for consideration. The various regulatory agencies and RCA discuss, review, and seek solutions to issues related to permitting and MSHCP compliance. The review and analysis presented in these meetings is often subject to MSHCP Consistency review which is part of Dudek’s role with the RCA. Meetings with the regulated waters Permitting Agencies this quarter were held on October 11, November 10, and December 8, 2021. In addition, in this reporting period, Dudek provided documentation and support to CDFW and USFWS related to ongoing projects and questions on MSHCP implementation.

Wildlife Agency Coordination and Meetings Dudek attended three monthly meetings with USFWS and CDFW staff hosted by the RCA. Duties included coordinating with attendees and review of materials ahead of the meeting. Meetings with the Wildlife Agencies this quarter were held on October 21, November 18, and December 16, 2021.

Participating Special Entities Dudek staff provided support and coordination related to pending and existing Participating Special Entities (PSEs). Dudek remains involved in processing of Southern California Edison (SCE) PSE application reviews. SCE continues to provide West of Devers System Upgrade Project (WODUP) documentation regarding for review regarding how their Certificate of Inclusion (COI) measures have or are being fulfilled. Coordination between Dudek and SCE has also been ongoing to help with SCE’s questions regarding mitigation implementation during WODUP construction. Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMC) and RCA have coordinated on remaining provisions in the Amended COI for Site 2 Laborde Canyon, and the Amended COI was issued November 2, 2021. The PSE Amended Findings for Site 1 Potrero Canyon are currently awaiting information from LMC before being finalized. Southern California Gas (SoCalGas) submitted a PSE Application package in September. Two conference calls have been held with the SoCalGas team, as well as separate calls with their consultant biologists, to discuss preliminary issues identified during the early phase of the review. Additional information to support the review has been requested necessary to complete the Findings. Eastern Municipal Water District submitted a PSE Application package this quarter for the Wickerd Road Sewer Pipeline. This application is currently under review as of December with comments to be provided in January 2022. Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District is still evaluating if using the PSE process for the Tomlin Pipeline, to obtain take coverage for species, such as California gnatcatcher, would be the most effective approach.

Criteria Refinements A request for a Criteria Refinement (CR) for the Beaumont Pointe Specific Plan (City of Beaumont) was submitted in March 2021. Comments have been provided during ongoing calls and in writing, and revisions to the supporting CR documentation are pending. Coordination with the applicant and their team is ongoing, including related conferences calls with the applicant and/or consultant

89

3

biologists, along with continued reviews/responses as questions/information to address various issues are submitted to RCA.

A request for a Criteria Refinement for the Lamb Canyon Landfill was submitted in December 2021. Comments have been provided, and revisions to the supporting CR documentation are pending.

RCA and Management Support Dudek staff provided various forms of analysis and provided staff support by attending meetings, conference calls, and conducting research related to ongoing and past projects. During this reporting period, Dudek was involved in discussions on various projects, particularly those with substantial issues. Dudek works closely with Tricia Campbell (Reserve Management/Monitoring Manager) and other RCA staff to assist with past and ongoing JPRs, PSEs, and Criteria Refinements, as well as report templates, Permittee and biological consultant coordination and training, training of new staff, and consistency with MSHCP implementation procedures, including Reserve Assembly (Cell/Cell Group/Subunit) analysis standards. In addition to all the aforementioned coordination, RCA and Dudek hold regular monthly meetings.

90

BLANK

CONSULTANT REPORT SAWA – MSHCP BIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM (BMP)

FISCAL YEAR 2022 SECOND QUARTER REPORT


Services provided during current work period:

Administrative

• Covid-19 updateo Staff working remotely; staggering biologists in officeo Trucks safely in warehouse. Maintenance and cleaning performedo Update COVID-19 protocol regularly.o SAWA offering paid leave to get vaccinations

• Sexual Harassment training complete• Retirement and Health insurance orientation complete on October 26, 2021• Wilderness First Aid classes scheduled for Jan/Feb - possible postponement• Section 8 of RCA Annual Report – Submitted for review• Annual MSHCP update presentation for Management Monitoring Coordination Meeting

scheduled for March 10, 2022• Management Monitoring Coordination Meetings held on Zoom with the following

presentations:o October 14, 2021: Exploring the secret lives of rattlesnakes. Presenter: William K.

Hayes, Ph.D. (Loma Linda University)o November 2021: Meeting canceled for holidayo December 9, 2021: Examining the effects of wastewater on the urban Santa Ana

River freshwater community in San Bernardino and Riverside Counties. Presenter: William Ota (UCR)

Biological Monitoring

Avian

• 2021 Avian Projects:o Data entry and QA/QC check completed for all 2021 bird surveyso Tricolored blackbird:

▪ Pre-survey meeting held on Zoom on October 19, 2021▪ Protocol finalized and distributed to the biologists for winter surveys

ATTACHMENT 2

91

▪ Obtained all access permits for the surveys in November 2022 ▪ Our biologists detected small groups of Tricolored Blackbirds near San

Jacinto Wildlife Area. ▪ Training materials distributed to biologists so they can start preparing for our

2022 spring surveys o California Gnatcatcher: Report in progress o Purple Martin: Report in progress o California Spotted Owl: Report in progress

Herpetofauna • 2021 Herpetofauna Projects:

o Vernal pools: No pools held water in 2021 o Herp arrays: Scouted for herp arrays o Turtle trapping: Scouted for Western Pond Turtle trapping locations o Fish

▪ Riverwalk organized by the Santa Ana Sucker Conservation Team, in which SAWA is a Riverwalk Partner and helps organize the event along with Riverwalk participation – Santa Ana Sucker habitat surveys

• Other tasks o New taxa Lead is being trained, defensive driver training complete o Worked with GIS analyst to familiarize Core Areas/data o Worked with Database Manager o Focusing on Southwestern Pond Turtle, Western Spadefoot, and Arroyo Toad in

2022 o Literature research for Southwestern Pond Turtle, Western Spadefoot, and Arroyo

Toad o Planning upcoming vernal pool survey trips for Western Spadefoot o Scouting turtle trapping locations o Vernal pool scouting in upper Salt Creek o Made species status excel sheet documenting which Core Areas for covered

species have supported the species in recent years o Studying local herp ID methods o Created amphibian ID guide for field biologists o Initial sort of Herps’ data photos complete.

Mammals • 2021 Mammal Projects

o Clinton Keith undercrossing camera trapping: species detected up to October 21, 2021: Coyote, Bobcat, Human (restoration worker and civilian), Domestic Dog (with human)

92

o Clinton Keith wildlife overcrossing; Quino Checkerspot Butterfly (QCB) cameras: QCB camera data entry complete

o Clinton Keith wildlife overcrossing camera trapping: species detected up to October 21, 2021: Coyote, Desert Cottontail, Mourning Dove, Bobcat, Human (restoration workers)

o Photos under review for species identification o QCB habitat survey protocol is now considered Clinton Keith Vegetation

Assessment protocol. QCB habitat protocol will be considered separate and led up by the QCB Survey Lead

o Los Angeles pocket mouse (LAPM): ▪ LAPM report: working on revisions and waiting on December 31, 2021 RCA

GIS layer ▪ Post survey presentation given on October 14, 2021 (for Management

Monitoring Coordination Meeting) o Long-tailed weasel (MUFR):

▪ Preparing for upcoming Long-tailed Weasel surveys. Ground truthing water sources so GIS specialist can finalize the suitable habitat model.

o Carnivores: Coyote and Bobcat incidentals at Arroyo Seco

Rare Plants • 2021 Rare Plant Projects

o Rare plant data entered, checked and certified o All of the old rare plant and Brandt’s Phacelia data has been scanned o Quino Checkerspot Butterfly habitat assessment protocol for next year in progress o Developing a new beginner plant guide of covered species o Clinton Keith Overcrossing vegetation assessment data certified and analysis in

progress o Engelmann Oak: surveys completed o Brandt’s Phacelia: raking treatments to the plots applied - data and co-occurring

vegetation data sets are both certified. Data analysis was performed, and preliminary results presented at the Candidate Conservation Agreements group in San Diego (Zoom meeting)

o Delhi Sands Flower-loving Fly vegetation surveys completed

Invertebrates • 2021 Quino Checkerspot Butterfly

o 2021 report draft completed and under review • 2021 Delhi Sands Flower-loving Fly

o 2021 report in progress

93

o 2021 vegetation surveys completed o 2021 arthropod data entry and checking completed, certification by Data Manager

pending

Data/GIS • 2021 Data/GIS

o November 20, 2021 datasets certified o January 20, 2021 datasets QC’d and certification pending o February 20, 2021 datasets awaiting QC by Data Manager o June 20, 2021 datasets currently being entered or checked o Bounding coordinates query application almost finished o Communications with Kim Boss (U.S. Forest Service [USFS]) regarding datasets

and their use o Sent 2017-2019 Brandt’s Phacelia preliminary results to Nancy Ferguson at U.S.

Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) o Supporting new Herp Lead on process to define unclear Core Areas for reptiles

and amphibians and determine whether species objectives are met o Server file clean-up project o Los Angeles Pocket Mouse appendix table database for Mammal Taxa Lead o Rubber Boa observations research o Started new avian database o Created new Tricolored Blackbird data entry form o Updated arthropods database o White-tailed Kite maps at Evandel properties for RCA o GIS analyst working on report maps, helping train new Herp Lead

Collaborations • Collaboration with USFWS biologist reviewing the status of the federally listed San

Jacinto Valley Crownscale • Coordinate with USFS to share 2021 CSOW surveys • Coordination continuing with California Department of Fish and Wildlife staff at the San

Jacinto Wildlife Area regarding management for Burrowing Owl reporting • Collaborate Alkali Vegetation Communities with MSHCP land management team • Manager/Herp Taxa Lead continuing to collaborate with USFWS (Will Miller)/other

Natural Community Conservation Plans on region-wide herpetofauna monitoring • Mammal Taxa Lead will share San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat tissue samples with San

Diego Zoo Wildlife Alliance

94

• Plant Taxa Lead, Marisa Grillo, attended the Candidate Conservation Agreements group in San Diego (Zoom meeting) on December 22, 2021 and presented preliminary results on the Brandt’s Phacelia treatment study

• Audubon Christmas Bird Count at San Jacinto Wildlife Area Training/Workshops • 2022 Tricolored Blackbird training in progress • Leads monthly meetings held on October 6, November 3, and December 1, 2021 • All-hands meeting held on October 19 and December 15, 2021 • New Herp Taxa Lead (Nate Kudla) training in progress

Status of Deliverables • FY 2021/2022

o Annual Work Plan/Budget: Complete • 2020 Reporting

o Annual Report: Submitted for review, pending • FY 2021/2022

o Quarterly Reports: 1st quarter – Submitted October 18, 2021 2nd quarter – Submitted January 21, 2022 3rd quarter – Due – April 8, 2022 4th quarter – Due – July 8, 2022

95

BLANK

1

CONSULTANT REPORT RIVERSIDE COUNTY REGIONAL PARKS AND OPEN-SPACE DISTRICT

MSHCP LAND MANAGEMENT UNIT FISCAL YEAR 2022 SECOND QUARTER REPORT


General Administration

The Riverside Regional Park and Open Space Districts MSHCP Land Management Unit’s (the Unit) “Sensitive Species Wildfire Advisory” map was adapted so that it could be submitted to the Hemet Fire Department. The map outlined areas within the Hemet area that have sensitive species and habitats that should be considered during fire suppression activity.

Natural Resource Manager (NRM) Reinig attended a meeting at the Meadows at Lone Cone properties with Southern California Edison (SCE) to discuss planned upgrades to the Canal 33kV line that passes through the properties. Previously completed habitat assessments, scope of work, and planned avoidance measures were discussed. The project aims to upgrade lines to heavier insulated wire, upgrade poles with fireproofing material, and install several new poles. Most avoidance measures were found agreeable; however, the installation of new poles will create new permanent impacts.

A meeting was held with SCE arborists at the RCA Calvary Chapel property. SCE’s Right of Entry to remove a row of Eucalyptus trees from the property’s southern boundary had just been finalized. Best practices were discussed to minimize habitat disturbance during the tree removal. During the visit, a new road was seen leading up to an SCE pole on the property. The disturbance was mapped and appeared to be caused by an SCE crew who had recently replaced the pole.

NRM Reinig opened communications with SCE concerning the newly discovered habitat disturbance at the Calvary Chapel property. It was confirmed that SCE was responsible for the damage. Evidence was seen that the damage was beyond drive and crush as cut and removed shrubs were seen piled next to the created road. Restoration options discussed for the road included erosion control, vertical mulching, seeding, and weeding for three years, and possibly installation of container plants. For the mixed grasslands impacted, restoration options discussed included leveling tire ruts and weeding to assure no increases in nonnatives occur.

Ranger Supervisor Ruben Rodriguez met with a deputy of the newly minted Riverside County Sheriff Agriculture Team. Discussions at the meeting involved trespass and public use issues that farmers, ranchers, and conserved lands managers have in common.

NRM Reinig held communications with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife Cannabis Unit concerning previously dismantled grow sites on RCA land that were awaiting cleanup. Helicopter and security assistance with cleanup, and improved channels of communications were requested. Talks are ongoing at the end of the quarter.

ATTACHMENT 3

96

2

NRM Reinig held communications with the Palomar View Estates Homeowner’s Association (HOA), for which the RCA Tax Sale Parcels 2019 Detail 5 property is located. The HOA was asking the RCA to mow the entire parcel or risk being fined. After a request to mow only portions of the property was denied by the HOA, the RCA determined to comply with the HOA’s request to mow the parcel. NRM Reinig reviewed and commented on the Clinton Keith Road Extension Off Site Habitat Mitigation and Monitoring Plan. A draft Property Analysis Record (PAR) was then created for funding the long-term management of one of the offsite mitigation areas for the project at Warm Springs Creek in the RCA Anheuser Busch property. Time was spent reviewing potential tax sale parcels for the RCA. Comments from a land management prospective were provided for each prospective parcel. Natural Resource Specialist (NRS) Kalee Koeslag created a protocol and datasheets for monitoring tree pests in woodlands on RCA property. An annual summary of work performed at the Soboba Phase 3 Conservation Easement was compiled and submitted to the Tribe per the Memorandum of Understanding concerning the parcel. All wildlife water guzzlers, perennial, and long-standing ephemeral water sources on RCA lands were mapped and submitted to the Santa Ana Watershed Association’s MSHCP Biological Monitoring Program (hereafter; Biological Monitoring Program) to assist in their upcoming Long-tailed Weasel surveys. 2021 covered species incidental observation forms were completed and submitted to the Biological Monitoring Program. Monthly billing reviews of Riverside Regional Parks and Open Space District (Riv Co Parks) invoices were completed. As part of the review, photos and notes summarizing noteworthy accomplishments of the Unit were compiled and submitted. NRS Koeslag designed and ordered 30 metal “Sensitive Habitat Keep Out” signs from a local vendor. NRS Ana Sawyer attended the annual California Invasive Plant Council Symposium. NRS Koeslag attended the annual meeting of the Entomological Society of America. NRS Koeslag attended the California Forest Pest Council meeting. NRM Reinig attended the annual San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat (Dipodomys merriami parvus) working group meeting. NRM Reinig attended the quarterly Tri-County Interagency Working Group. NRM Reinig and NRS Koeslag attended Santa Ana River and Orange County Weed Management Area Meeting. The monthly RCA Management and Monitoring Coordination meeting and the monthly Riv Co Parks Managers meeting were regularly attended by NRM Reinig.

97

3

Monthly MSHCP Management and Monitoring meetings were attended. Staff attended monthly MSHCP Land Management Unit staff meetings. NRM Reinig attended the annual Riv Co Parks Manager’s Retreat. All staff participated in Wilderness First Aid and CPR training. Parks Maintenance Worker (PMW) Stanley Miller completed seven hours of continued education for Qualified Applicators Certification issued by the California Department of Pesticide Regulation. Patrol/Enforcement/Maintenance Badlands Habitat Management Unit (HMU) Ranger Richard Chagolla made regular contact with the SoCalGas crew conducting pipeline inspection and maintenance work at and in the vicinity of the Schmeling property. The crew complied with the RCA requests to limit impacts to predefined work areas. The crew voiced concerns about off-highway vehicles (OHVs) and target shooters, however most issues were found to be occurring on and emanating from private properties in the area. The fencing adjacent to the property’s gate was found cut on one occasion and was repaired. During an early morning patrol on Jack Rabbit Trail Road, Ranger Chagolla made contact in the field with a SoCalGas biologist. The biologist informed the ranger that they had just witnessed two individuals driving a U-Haul truck illegally dumping refuse off Jack Rabbit trail onto the CALMAT property. Ranger Chagolla caught up to the individuals near State Route-60 and waived them down. The individuals were convinced to return and pick up all items which they had tossed down a steep hillside onto the RCA property. Contact information was exchanged, and the individuals were escorted out of the area. The area was also patrolled weekly with several other noteworthy incidents. Contact was made with a total of five groups of OHV riders and one group of target shooters on Jack Rabbit Trail Road. The riders and shooters were informed of the County’s prohibition of their activity (Ord. 529 and 514) and were asked to leave the area. One dirt bike jump which had been reconstructed on the property was dismantled and a new OHV access point into the property was closed with a fence segment. The Wolfskill/Driscoll property was patrolled weekly. The property’s gates were found open and were resecured shut on two occasions, and five repairs were made to the property’s fencing. Near the property on non-RCA County land, Ranger Chagolla contacted a group of four upland game hunters. The hunters were informed that the land was closed to hunting and asked to leave.

Cactus Valley HMU Ranger Robert Fountain inspected the O’Connor property for OHV issues. Two OHV go-arounds were found at the fencing along the property’s southern boundary and several new OHV trails had been created on the property. A steel cage blocking entrance to the property’s defunct mine was also found torn off. The fence go-arounds were blocked with additional fencing and signage, and repairs to the mine’s barricade were scheduled.

98

4

At the RCA Bautista Canyon property, rangers spent time locating OHV access points after tracks were observed inside the property. Along the northern and eastern boundaries of the property, cuts to fencing were found, repaired, and posted with signage. One internal fence was also patched as it was along the path that the OHV had been traveling. Subsequent checks of the property later in the quarter found the repairs undisturbed. At the RCA properties along Hemet Ranch Road, Ranger Fountain met with a private property owner next to RCA Life Springs Assembly property. The private property owner had OHVs break into his property and suspected they had come from RCA land. The area was inspected, and it was determined that the OHVs had originated from a separate private parcel. Patrols of other RCA properties in the area (Cordes, Burcher, Veshkini, etc.) occurred with little issue. At Veshkini, an OHV go-around of recently installed fencing was located and blocked. Tax Sale Parcel 2012 Detail 1 was checked monthly with no issues to report. Gavilan HMU The RCA properties along El Toro Road (Adams, Andrade, North Peak #1, 2, 3, 4, etc.) continued to have dumping and vehicular trespassing activity and were patrolled regularly. Damage and cuts to fencing along El Toro Cut Off Road were located and repaired/reinforced on eight occasions. OHV riders in the area were contacted on four occasions and asked to leave and dumping was addressed by maintenance staff (see Maintenance/Fencing, Gavilan HMU section below for more details). Ranger staff discovered a cut fence and an OHV fence go-around at the Hariton property. The cut was repaired, and an additional 70 feet of fencing was installed to block the go-around. A possible stolen car was located and reported to DMV investigators at the RCTC Abusamra property. Later in the quarter Ranger Chagolla contacted two homeless OHV riders and escorted them off the property Ranger Chagolla contacted three OHV riders staging near the Johnson Mine property and escorted them out of the area. The Reynolds property was inspected regularly. Two fence cuts and two cut opened gates were found and remedied at the property. A cut fence at Toscana Donation Phase 2 was located and repaired. The Ordonez property was patrolled with no issues to report. Menifee HMU Signs of increased OHV and mountain bike activity at the Anheuser Busch property were apparent in the second quarter. The increases were affirmed by motion activated game cameras deployed by the Biological Monitoring Program at the property that caught several series of riders near the property’s wildlife crossings at Clinton Keith Road. As a result, patrols of the property were increased to several times a month and issues were addressed as they were discovered. At the southeast corner of the property, several unknown locks on the property’s gate were removed from the system. On another occasion a separate gate to the property was found cut open and was resecured. OHV

99

5

tracks were followed back to their sources, which in two instances revealed gaps in fencing abutting private property. The residents at the private parcels were contacted and notified that the property was closed to OHV riding. The two large gaps in fencing were remedied later by maintenance staff (see Maintenance/Fencing, Menifee HMU section below for more details). The beginning of a new mountain bike trail was discovered and signed with a “Closed Trail” sign. Finally, late in the quarter while on patrol of the property, Ranger Fountain followed the sounds of target shooters to a private property immediately adjacent to the property’s leased horse ranch. The shooters were contacted and told their shooting was not permissible due to its proximity to the horse ranch and conserved land. At the Cornerstone property staff made monthly repairs to cut wildlife fencing. The fence is regularly targeted by hikers and bike riders who seek to recreate beyond the fence in an area closed due to possible unexploded ordinances. Patrols of the Delgado properties occurred monthly. Neighbors in the area reported increased OHV activity in the area. Defaced signage was replaced, and one fence cut was located and repaired. On one occasion contact was attempted with two dirt bike riders within the property but was unsuccessful when the riders fled the area. Ranger Fountain performed monthly patrols the trails of the Winchester 700 Murrieta property via electric bike (ebike). Rocks and debris placed on a closed trail were found removed by riders on one occasion and were replaced. A cut to the property’s fencing at its southeast corner was repaired after being reported cut by a neighbor. The Chappell property was patrolled approximately weekly. A board covering one of the property’s buildings was found torn off and replaced on one occasion. A cut fence was located and repaired at the Nelson property. The trails of the Gentry property were patrolled via ebike with no issues to report. A check on the Casa Modelo property was conducted with no issues. Reports from a neighbor of large-scale dumping in the area were found to be on a neighboring private property. Additional properties patrolled in the Menifee HMU with no issues to report included Bales, Benton 36, Edwards, El Sol, Emerald Aliso, Evandel-Bergstein, Evandel-Wilson, Fleming French Valley, Kisling, Kobashi, McCormick, Rindahl, Scheer, and Shiang. Sage HMU The contiguous Wilson Creek area properties (Pena, Odegaard, Terra Investors, United Five Star Capital, and Wilson Creek) were regularly patrolled. Efforts by staff in recent quarters to reign in OHV trespass issues at the properties was found to be largely effective as evident by a large decrease in OHV sign within the property. Relatively untampered fencing was also observed. Still, one cut in the fencing was located in the eastern fencing of the United Five Star property and one cut was located in the recently installed cable and post barricade of the Wilson Creek property. Both cuts were repaired. The Glen Oaks area properties (Bell, Selders, Weigel, etc.) were patrolled several times a month with little issues to report. Following reports from a neighbor of individuals with firearms at the

100

6

properties, Ranger Fountain located and contacted two target shooters who had hiked in and began shooting on RCA land. The shooters were told to pack up their belongings and were escorted off the property. A lightly used dirt bike trail that amounted to a large fence go-around entering the property block from the south was located. The trail was scheduled to be monitored for possible remedial action. The Flood Control Temecula Creek Conservation Easement was patrolled for homeless encampments on two occasions. While no activity was seen within the property, a cut in the chain-link fence that provided pedestrian access to the creek necessitated mending. At the Mulder property contact was made with an individual on foot scouting the area for hunting. RCA conserved land rules, including the prohibition of hunting were conveyed to the individual. The RH Acquisition Company property was patrolled twice. One fence go-around was signed with a “No OHV” sign and a wash out on a trail was blocked with caution tape. Additional properties patrolled in the Sage HMU with no issues to report included Agua Tibia, Anza Knolls, Burum, Bush, Bustos, Geller #2 Phase 1, and Mustang Lane. San Jacinto HMU The gate of the Wilhelm Ranch property was found cut open early in the quarter. Vehicle tracks passing through the gate with a cut lock were followed to a distribution pole that was scheduled for repairs within the property. In a previous quarter, the Unit had been contacted by SCE contractors who sought to repair the pole but failed to show up on the day scheduled for the job. Fearing that the SCE contractors may complete the repairs without notifying the Unit in an area with sensitive native plant resources, a “stop work” order was put in with SCE’s Environmental Compliance Office. The job would then be coordinated through the compliance office moving forward. The same gate was found with a cut lock and the lock was replaced on two other occasions. Later in the quarter, along the northern boundary of the Wilhelm Ranch property staff began picking up a moderate sized trash heap that was piled up along the fencing of an adjacent Chrysler Dodge Jeep dealership storage lot. It was determined the trash was dumped over the fence from the adjacent storage lot. Items amongst the debris included license plate frames, paper license plates, flags, and paperwork. Rangers Alfredo Salazar and Fountain contacted the dealership’s management and showed them the trash. The dealership admitted responsibility and was persuaded to remove the refuse. Ranger Salazar discovered two mobile homes had recently been placed on the Percival property by an adjacent private property owner. Communications were initiated with the owner who worked to remove the structures from the RCA property. Impacts were limited to vehicle tracks on nonnative grasslands. Off-highway vehicle access controls were targeted several times at the Pico Thompson property. The property’s eastern gate was cut open during one occasion and a heavy OHV barricade was breached on two occasions. Repairs were made to the access controls. Patrols of the San Jacinto River property block in Hemet (EMWD Conservation Easement, SJRR, KHOV, etc.) were completed on an approximately weekly basis with little new items to report. A set of vehicle tracks inside of the RCTC McAlister Donation were followed to a cut in the property’s fence, which was repaired. Two breaches to an OHV barricade at the EMWD Conservation Easement adjacent to the collection ponds were located and repaired.

101

7

Ranger Salazar completed the annual site inspection of the Riverpark Mitigation Bank Conservation Easement. Issues documented and mapped included ten cuts to the property’s fencing, 300 feet of missing fencing in one section, OHV and equestrian activity inside the property, and scattered litter throughout. A summary and map of the issues was submitted to the RCA so that it could be reported to Ecosystem Investment Partners (who manage the property). Ranger Salazar contacted two dove hunters along the western boundary of the Nuevo Donation to notify them to not cross into the RCA parcel. Following citizen reports of disking in the area, the Warren Road Partners and Laymen properties were checked. No disturbances were found on RCA properties. Additional properties patrolled in the San Jacinto HMU with no issues to report included Carlsbad, Kaelin, KB SJ Rive Donation, Hemet Market Place, and the Soboba Donations. Santa Ana Mountains HMU Following reports of possible grading into RCA property, a disturbance was confirmed, mapped, and posted with RCA “Boundary” signs at the Fethke property. The neighboring private property owner was contacted and admitted that his contractor was responsible for grading 0.18 acre of the property; resulting in cleared vegetation and a small cut slope. Communications with the landowner are ongoing to resolve the disturbance. The mountain bike trail closures at the Francis property were inspected multiple times. Although sporadic use of the trail by mountain bikers was noted, all access controls blocking the trail remained undisturbed. A new BMX bike track was found on private property abutting the Bishop property’s fencing. Signage was added to the fence to discourage the activity from spilling over onto RCA land.

An 8-foot by 8-foot “Prayer Changes Things” billboard was removed from the freeway edge at the Trivalley property. Additional properties patrolled in the Santa Ana HMU with no issues to report included Fischer, Lowe Trust, Rancho Rd. Escarpment, Shamblen, Tax Sale Parcels 2013 Detail 12, and Tax Sale Parcels 2019 Detail 2. San Timoteo HMU At the Pecuniary Capital property staff responded to additional reports of encroachments onto RCA land. Grading was confirmed in three areas, totaling 0.44 acre, along the southern edge of the RCA property. The grading appeared to be emanating from two different private parcels to the south of the property. One of the private parcels also had new fencing extending 0.13 acre into the RCA property. Contact was made with the residents of both private parcels who were notified to cease any additional encroachments into the property. The private parcel with fencing extending into RCA land was asked to move the fence back to the legal property line. The encroached areas were mapped, signed with RCA “No Trespassing” signs, and reported to Code Enforcement. By quarter’s end the fence line encroachment had been moved back to the legal property line.

102

8

The Kehl Canyon properties (GKSM LTD, Kramer, Lin, and Wang) were patrolled approximately weekly. In the early daylight hours during the first two days of deer season, five four-wheel drive OHVs and three trucks of hunters were turned away prior to entering the area. Throughout the quarter the area’s eastern gate and adjacent fencing were targeted several times by vandals and necessitated one gate repair, one replaced lock, and a reinforcement to the fencing. In the western portion of the Kramer property two fence repairs were made, including one section of cable barricade that was cut. The Oak Valley Partners property continued to experience an uptick in OHV activity following the removal of extensive private fencing at an adjacent private parcel in the first quarter. As a result, the property was patrolled at least weekly. Through the quarter a total of ten cuts were repaired to the property’s fencing on its north, west, and south boundary. Ranger Chagolla worked with a neighboring landowner to dismantle one metal and one earthen dirt bike jumps that had been constructed near the two properties’ boundaries. Contact was made with ten OHV riders/groups of riders (one contact involved a group of six jeeps) in the area to inform them of property boundaries and uses. In addition to OHV concerns at the property several other issues arose. Contact was made with one individual in a vehicle within the property attempting to access their new property to the west of Oak Valley. The individual could not produce any documents that asserted they had an access easement within the RCA property, and they were asked to not return. Two homeless individuals setting up camp along the property’s northern boundary where notified that camping was not allowed on RCA land and they left the area. Finally, a Riverside County Sheriff’s deputy was dispatched to the area after Ranger Chagolla found a noncompliant elderly man vandalizing bee boxes adjacent to the property. The man, who was suffering with dementia was escorted home by the deputy. The gate lock of the Cuccia Vogel property was found cut on one occasion and was replaced. Five realtor signs that had been installed within the property along Redlands Boulevard were removed by staff. A cut lock on the Spring Mountain Ranch Donation at Pigeon Pass Road was replaced on one occasion. The Palmyrita and Henry properties were patrolled with no issues to report. Maintenance/ Fencing

General Staff worked to resolve engine power issues on the Unit’s dump truck. Rodent-chewed wires were repaired.

Cactus Valley HMU PMW Francisco Guzman and Ranger Fountain cut up a large oak tree that had fallen in front of the cabin at the Goodhart Ranch property residence.

Gavilan HMU MSHCP staff worked at the Roth property after receiving notice from a neighbor of renewed OHV issues. The standalone property is surrounded by private parcels with significant OHV activity. The

103

9

western gate of the property was found cut open, while the eastern gate was closed with unknown locks added in. Both gates were reinforced with case hardened chain and heavy MSHCP locks. The riparian canyon on the property was found with a new four-wheel OHV trail passing through it. Staff spent two visits installing/reinstalling access controls. New T-posts were added to some existing fencing, fencing above the riparian trail were repaired, and a new blockade was created on an OHV side trail. New additional and replacement signage was placed around the property. A trash pile at the North Peak #1 property was cleaned up by maintenance staff. Two truckloads of household and cannabis grow material were picked up and hauled away.

Menifee HMU

Rangers Salazar and Fountain and PMW Guzman continued to seek out and remedy possible OHV access points into the Anheuser Busch property. Two new fence segments (140 feet and 70 feet) of T-post and wire were installed at separate private property interfaces along the eastern boundary of the property to block OHV trails. Near the western boundary of the property staff completed installation of 70 feet of T-post and wire fencing at the northeast corner and 100 feet of T-post and wire fencing at the northwest corner of adjacent Fuller property. Prior to fencing the northwest corner of the Fuller property, staff used one of the Unit’s tractors to return natural contours to a small area that had been graded within the property. Rangers spoke with surrounding property owners but were unsuccessful at locating those responsible. The new fencing as well as adjacent fencing of the Anheuser Busch property were then heavily signed. At the Chappell property staff removed a large tree branch that had fallen on the road. Staff picked up three large garbage bags worth of dumped refuse along Borel Road at the Fleming French Valley Phase 1 property.

Sage HMU PMWs Jeffrey Burke and Guzman completed and installed a modified second horse step-over at Glen Oaks area properties, after the previous version was vandalized by a disgruntled equestrian in the previous quarter. Approximately 180 feet of T-post and wire fencing was installed along Via Del Oro Road adjacent to the step-over to dissuade OHVs from circumventing it. About 40 feet of new fencing was likewise installed adjacent to the properties’ other step-over for the same purpose. Progress was made on scouting and rectifying OHV access points into the eastern side of the Jalem property. Several new trails had been created within the property in recent months. Ranger Salazar signed the boundary and blocked one of the trails with a fence segment. The area needs new fencing, which is planned for the third quarter. Staff fabricated and installed a gate at the new Eustachio property. Roadside dumping at the Cordova property along Wilson Valley Road was cleaned up. Two jugs of fertilizer, empty bottles of pesticides, irrigation tubing, and loose trash was removed. San Jacinto HMU In the south-eastern portion of the KB SJ River Donation maintenance staff completed installation of 1,945 feet of T-post and wire fencing to protect the property’s main vernal pool. The pool area is

104

10

occupied by the federally Endangered Spreading Navarretia (Navarretia fossalis) and OHVs from neighboring private property had begun to impact it. Staff installed 150 feet of T-post and wire fencing at the RCTC Dilworth Donation and repaired 150 feet of barbwire fencing at the RCTC Dilworth Donation #2 to block vehicles from entering the properties on a fire dozer road (recently created during wildfire suppression activities). Staff began signing all properties in the Hemet alkali vernal playa habitat complex with RCA “No Trespassing” signage. The properties had no historical use by the public and are home to several rare and listed plant species. PMW Guzman picked up one trash bag full of trash, two tires, and five quarts of used motor oil that had been dumped at KB Homes Coastal Donation. At the Soboba Donation four large garbage bags worth of trash and four 5-quart containers of used motor oil were cleaned up.

At the Sey property staff picked up seven bags of trash and 36 tires at the end of the cul-de-sac on Cordoba Drive.

San Timoteo HMU

To prevent further dumping on the RCA property staff completed installation of 280 feet of new fencing at the Lin Property along its interface with the private inholding. Weed Abatement Annual vegetation (totaling approximately three acres) of the Tax Sale Parcel 2019 Detail 5 property was tractor mowed by staff per the fuel abatement requirement of the property’s homeowner’s association.

Habitat/Species Management General NRS Koeslag began preparing for multiple in-house restoration projects. With help from maintenance staff, a plant grow house was transported from the Scheer property to a prepared area at the Unit’s main office at the Hidden Valley Wildlife Area. The grow house was revamped with new plumbing and covered in plastic for wintertime plant propagation. Soil and other supplies were purchased and hundreds of container plants, totaling 25 species, were propagated from seed. Further information about each planned restoration project can be found below in the Gavilan and Menifee HMU sections. Badlands HMU The Wolfskill/Driscoll wildlife water guzzler was cleaned and filled on two occasions. Photo documentation at photo point monitoring stations were completed at the Calmat property.

105

11

Gavilan HMU NRS Koeslag collected onsite native seeds for coastal sage scrub restoration planned for the North Peak #1 property. Two-point intercept monitoring transects were established and sampled at the site for baseline and future habitat information. The Reynolds property wildlife water guzzler was cleaned and filled on two occasions. Menifee HMU In order to properly time seed collection efforts, NRS Sawyer monitored the Parish’s Brittlescale (Atriplex parishii) population that she found in the first quarter on RCA land. In November, the seeds of the exceedingly rare plant were deemed ready for collection and S&S Seeds, Inc. was contacted for assistance. Approximately 200 seeds (20% of total seeds present) were collected and retained by S&S Seeds for processing. While the vernal pool depression that the Brittlescale inhabits, retaines good native plant diversity with little nonnative vegetation, the surrounding habitat was found to be composed mostly of nonnative annual vegetation. To decrease nonnative plant competition on the Brittlescale population, a buffer zone restoration surrounding the population was devised. NRS Koeslag collected and began growing native seeds from the site for the restoration. One-point intercept monitoring transect was established and sampled at the site for baseline and future habitat information. At the Cornerstone property preparation was started to restore a 4-acre portion of the property that had been historically disced for farming purposes. NRS Koeslag collected and began growing native seeds from the site for the planned coastal sage scrub restoration. Four-point intercept monitoring transects were established and sampled at the site for baseline and future habitat information. NRS Koeslag collected onsite native seeds for coastal sage scrub restoration planned at the McElhinney/Stimmel property. One-point intercept monitoring transect was established and sampled at the site for baseline and future habitat information. NRS Koeslag collected native grass seeds from Anheuser Busch property to be used for restorations in the Menifee area. NRS Sawyer and Koeslag conducted tri-annual surveys and subterranean maintenance of artificial burrows at the McElhinney/Stimmel property Burrowing Owl (Athene cunicularia) complex. Two Burrowing Owls were observed, and one burrow was vacuumed after being found clogged with soil. Several other burrows likely also needed vacuuming; however, were not cleared due to animals occupying the artificial tunnels. NRS Sawyer and Koeslag conducted tri-annual surveys of artificial burrows at the El Sol property Burrowing Owl (Athene cunicularia) complex. Six Burrowing Owls were observed and many of artificial burrows were found clogged with soil. The clogged burrows were not cleared due to steady rains late in the quarter. SCE tree cutting work at the Calvary Chapel property was monitored by staff. By the end of the quarter nearly the entire row of Eucalyptus trees had been removed from the property’s southern boundary. SCE arborists did a good job at removing the trees with minimal habitat disturbance to surrounding lands.

106

12

NRS Koeslag conducted the quarterly inspection of the Clinton Keith wildlife fencing. Issues with the fencing (gaps and erosion) remained largely unaddressed since the previous check and no new issues were discovered. Mapping of the issues was provided to the Riverside County Transportation Department to assist in their efforts to locate and remedy the issues.

River HMU Photo documentation at photo point monitoring stations were completed at the Teledyne property. Sage HMU: Maintenance staff worked at relocating and improving the wildlife water guzzler at the Anza Knolls property. A design incorporating 55-gallon water drums, a small concrete basin, and an automatic valve was utilized in a cooler area from the property’s previous guzzler. The Winchester 700 Reed Valley property’s spring fed wildlife water guzzler was cleaned on three occasions. The Cordova property’s wildlife water guzzler was cleaned and filled on three occasions. Photo documentation at photo point monitoring stations were completed at the Cordova, Gabrych, and JPR6 properties.

San Jacinto HMU: An experiment was implemented to test control methods of the highly invasive Stinknet (Oncosiphon pilulifer) weed and nonnative grasses in the Hemet alkali vernal playa habitat. The habitat is at risk of further invasion of the weeds and is occupied by several sensitive plant species. NRS Sawyer collaborated with United States Fish and Wildlife Service and University of California at Riverside Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources on the study design which consisted of 40 2-meter by 4-meter plots at the Kaelin #2 property. Each plot was treated with various combinations, concentrations, and timings of species-specific herbicides that showed promise in controlling the targeted weeds with limited impact to native plants. Staff utilized a tractor and rakes to level and compact a dozer line in a vernal pool at the RCTC Dilworth #2 property. The dozer line had recently been created through the pool during wildland fire suppression activities of the Stowe fire and threatened to disrupt the hydrology of the pool. Photo documentation at photo point monitoring stations were also completed at the property. A patch of Eucalyptus trees along Stetson Avenue at the RCTC Dilworth Donation #2 were inspected after being marked as “hazardous” by SCE. The trees were found to be stressed, within striking distance of nearby power lines, and void of raptor nests. SCE was given permission to remove the trees, which they did. NRS Sawyer and Koeslag conducted tri-annual surveys and subterranean maintenance of artificial burrows at the Nuevo Donation Burrowing Owl complex. Half of the burrows, which were unoccupied, were vacuumed clear of soil and one Burrowing Owl was observed in a burrow, which was avoided during burrow maintenance.

107

13

NRS Sawyer inspected restoration work being conducted at the EMWD San Jacinto River Conservation Easement and Wilder property. SCE contractors were conducting the work in areas that had been disturbed by SCE crews while conducting distribution pole upgrades across the properties. Restoration included weeding, leveling tire tracks and ruts, and vertical mulching in the disturbed areas. The work was found to be satisfactory. Photo documentation at photo point monitoring stations were completed at the Carlsbad, Kaelin #2, KB Homes Costal Donation, EMWD Conservation Easement, SJRR, Wilhelm Ranch, and Warren Road Partners properties. Santa Ana Mountains HMU:

NRS Koeslag discovered a stressed Engelmann Oak (Quercus engelmannii) along the roadside at the Cachia property that was posted as “hazardous” by SCE. Communications were initiated with SCE concerning the covered species being slated for removal. NRM Reinig met with an SCE arborist at the Cachia property to inspect the tree. While the tree was very stressed, it was explained that Engelmann Oaks are drought deciduous and that it may simply be dormant following a dry year. SCE conceded the removal of the tree and would address only the current imminent danger issue with minimal impacts to the tree and agreed to only trim one of its branches away from power lines and monitor for future issues. Photo documentation at photo point monitoring stations were completed at the La Laguna, Trivalley, and Saddleback properties. Acquisitions

Initial Site Inspections: The following properties were inspected and/or re-inspected by NRS staff prior to acquisition. All covered species were reported to the MSHCP Biological Monitoring Program, and all outstanding issues were mapped and submitted to the RCA/RCTC’s acquisition team so that they could be addressed during the acquisition phase. Belle Terre Donation - The 106.17-acre property is comprised of several disjunct parcels. The largest parcel consisted of healthy coastal sage scrub habitat, while smaller parcels support cottonwood-willow riparian habitat and vacant disturbed agricultural land. Covered species noted included Loggerhead Shrike (Lanius ludovicianus), Northern Harrier (Circus hudsonius), and Coyote (Canis latrans). Most of the property’s witness markers were absent. No dumping or other environmental concerns were noted. Briggs Road - As the name implies, this 17.28-acre property abuts the western edge of Briggs Road north of Murrieta. Much of the site had been recontoured during the construction of the road as was evident by numerous areas with remnants of silt fences, gravel bags, plastic mesh straw waddles, and wooden stakes. Habitat on the manufactured slopes consisted of healthy and mature coastal sage scrub. The remainder of the property was also dominated by coastal sage scrub habitat and two small riparian patches. One v-ditch was also noted within the property’s boundaries and several piles of dumped refuse were located. Most of the property’s witness markers were absent. EIP Walker Canyon - The 239.87-acre property is comprised of rocky hills bisected by three washes (drainages). The canyon bottoms contained sparse willow-sycamore riparian habitat while the

108

14

upland areas were dominated by Riversidean sage scrub with a large nonnative grass component. Covered species observed during the inspection included Coastal Western Whiptail (Cnemidophorus tigris multiscutatus), California Coastal Gnatcatcher (Polioptila californica californica), and Southern California Rufous-Crowned Sparrow (Aimophila ruficeps canescens). An unknown Matilija Poppy (Romneya sp.) was also documented. Outstanding issues encountered on the property included grading encroachments from two neighboring private parcels, two abandoned vehicles, various piles of dumped refuse, dumped tires, and metal objects used as target practice. Most of the property’s witness markers were absent. Johnson – The 9.76-acre property is in use as a farm machinery storage area. The parcel was clear of vegetation. Approximately two-thirds of the property was bare soil and the remaining one-thrid was unsealed asphalt. All of the property’s witness markers were absent. M Family Estate – The property is 291 acres of rugged topography in the foothills of the San Bernardino Mountains. South-facing hillsides of the property were comprised of coastal sage scrub and chaparral with nonnative grasses. Other hillsides typically had healthier coastal sage scrub and chaparral habitats with far fewer nonnative plants. Several drainages within the property were dominated by Coast Live Oak woodlands. Covered species observations at the property were restricted to tracks and scat and included Coyote, Bobcat (Lynx rufus), Mountain Lion (Puma concolor), Black Bear (Ursus americanus), and Mule Deer (Odocoileus hemionus). Several piles of old dumped refuse and tires, as well as an old electric fence surrounding abandoned beehives were noted. Most of the property’s witness markers were present. Poto - The property is 50.52 acres of a southwest facing hillside of decomposing granite and coastal sage scrub habitat. Extensive old irrigation tubing, some small trash piles, and two wooden signs were noted. Most of the property’s witness markers were absent. Small – A pre-acquisition inspection of the property had been completed in a previous quarter, but staff returned this quarter to inspect a small portion of a parcel that was being added to the acquisition. The additional portion close to Sage Road supported healthy coastal sage scrub habitat with no outstanding issues. Welsh - The 20.02-acre property was mostly comprised of Coast Live Oak woodland with some coastal sage scrub and chaparral components. A large wash (drainage) going west to east through the property contained scattered willows (Salix sp.) and many large Tamarix (Tamarix ramosissima) trees. A neighboring property had a gap in their fenced boundary with the Welsh property and appeared to be using the property to dump large piles of branches with heavy equipment. Trash concerns noted included large, corrugated metal pipes, a small golf green, and scattered metal scraps. Most of the property’s witness markers were absent.

109

AGENDA ITEM 7

BLANK

Agenda Item 7


DATE: March 7, 2022


FROM: Executive Committee Tyler Madary, Senior Management Analyst, Legislative Affairs


SUBJECT: State and Federal Legislative Update

EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Board of Directors to receive and file an update on state and federal legislative affairs.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION: State Update On January 10, 2022, Governor Newsom unveiled his proposed Fiscal Year 2022-23 Budget. This $286.4 billion proposal kicks off the season of budget negotiations. In addition to the State’s continued response to the COVID-19 pandemic, Governor Newsom identified the climate change crisis as one of his top priorities. This budget proposes to invest $22.5 billion in one-time climate action funds over five years. This multi-year funding is a significant investment, but it is important to remember that no budget may obligate the general fund spending of future fiscal years. Budgetary outlooks can change by the year, and it will take the advocacy of RCA to make ongoing funding increases a reality. Of the Governor’s climate action proposals, the Legislative Affairs Team (Team) is interested in the proposed investments in nature-based solutions to climate change. The Governor proposes to spend $382 million in the next year for drought response, resilience against wildfires, urban greening, climate smart agriculture, coastal restoration, economic investment in agriculture, forestry, and climate restoration, as well as nature-based solutions to combat climate change, expand outdoor access, and protect biodiversity. These initiatives are broad and cover a lot of ground, with finite funds. Nonetheless, the Team will be engaged in the budget process to underscore Habitat Conservation Plans (HCPs) and Natural Community Conservation Planning (NCCPs) as shelf-ready tools to improve biodiversity and outdoor access, and advance nature-based solutions to climate change.

110

Agenda Item 7

Other proposed spending that will continue to be monitored is the $768 million in one-time general funds allocated over two years, to implement the State’s Natural and Working Lands Climate Smart Strategy and the Pathways to 30x30 strategy. These strategies, which the Team has been providing public comments on behalf of RCA since May 2021, are intended to guide the State’s effort to conserve 30% of lands and waters by 2030. While these strategy documents are still pending, the Governor has identified five categories that these funds could support: • Scale support for forest, desert, and oak woodland conservation; wetland and riparian

restoration; and rangeland, grazing land and grassland protection through projects that expand equitable access to nature, protect biodiversity, and deliver climate benefits on the State's natural and working lands;

• Promote regional action through expanded technical assistance and capacity building; • Increase workforce development and training opportunities through the California

Conservation Corps, local conservation corps, tribal conservation corps, and expanded environmental literacy;

• Partner with California Native American tribes to implement shared nature-based solutions; and

• Support additional strategic investments to drive implementation of the Natural and Working Lands Climate Smart Strategy and Pathways to 30x30 document.

The Team will track the development of funding programs associated with the expanded access to lands that promote biodiversity and climate benefits, expanded technical assistance to regions, and investing in the implementation of the Natural and Working Lands Climate Smart Strategy and Pathways to 30x30 document. Advocacy will continue both through the public comment process for the finalization of these strategic documents and through the budget process for chaparral to be included as an eligible landscape for conservation. Additionally, the case will be made that the State’s strategy documents may only be implemented with increased, dedicated, ongoing funding for HCPs and NCCPs for land acquisition. Federal Update The Team continues to monitor implementation of the bipartisan $1.2 trillion Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) to determine how HCPs may be an eligible component to the climate resiliency funding elements contained in the new law. As of the writing of this report, RCTC’s response is being drafted to a broad Request for Information (RFI) by the U.S. Department of Transportation regarding how to best approach implementation of the IIJA. RCTC’s response to this RFI will include comments in support of adding greater weight and consideration to proposed projects for the new Wildlife Crossings Pilot Program that are located within HCPs. Wildlife Refuge Bill Work continues with Senator Feinstein and Representative Calvert’s offices to ensure bicameral support for establishing a refuge in Western Riverside County. An important part of the work underway is ensuring that Senator Feinstein’s bill language is consistent with

111

Agenda Item 7

Representative Calvert’s Western Riverside Wildlife Refuge bill, H.R. 972. The Team continues to engage with the USFWS field office and their D.C. headquarters office via contact with Representative Calvert’s staff. FISCAL IMPACT: This is a policy and information item. There is no fiscal impact. Attachment: State and Federal Update Legislative Matrix

112

BLANK

WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY REGIONAL CONSERVATION AUTHORITY POSITIONS ON STATE AND FEDERAL LEGISLATION – FEBRUARY 2022

Legislation/ Author

Description Bill Status

Position Date of Board Adoption

SB 45 (Portantino)

Wildfire Prevention, Safe Drinking Water, Drought Preparation, and Flood Protection Bond Act of 2022. This bill would enact the Wildfire Prevention, Safe Drinking Water, Drought Preparation, and Flood Protection Bond Act of 2022, which, if approved by the voters, would authorize the issuance of bonds in the amount of $5,595,000,000 pursuant to the State General Obligation Bond Law to finance projects for a wildfire prevention, safe drinking water, drought preparation, and flood protection program.

Gutted and amended by Senator Portantino into an organic waste bill. January 3, 2022

Support, if amended

(based on platform)

April 8, 2021

AB 1500 (Garcia)

Safe Drinking Water, Wildfire Prevention, Drought Preparation, Flood Protection, Extreme Heat Mitigation, and Workforce Development Bond Act of 2022. This bill, which if approved by the voters, would authorize the issuance of bonds in the amount of $6,955,000,000 pursuant to the State General Obligation Bond Law to finance projects for safe drinking water, wildfire prevention, drought preparation, flood protection, extreme heat mitigation, and workforce development programs.

Re-referred to Assembly Rules Committee on May 20, 2021. Died as of January 31, 2022 deadline for each house to pass bills introduced in their house in 2021. February 1, 2022

Support, if amended

(based on platform)

March 30, 2021

H.R. 972 (Calvert)

A bill to establish the Western Riverside County Wildlife Refuge. This legislation creates the federal government's framework to meet its obligations under the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) Implementing agreement.

Ordered Reported by the House Committee on Natural Resources July 14, 2021

Support April 5, 2021

113

BLANK

AGENDA ITEM 8

BLANK

Agenda Item 8


DATE: March 7, 2022


FROM: Executive Committee Tricia Campbell, Reserve Management/Monitoring Manager


SUBJECT: Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan 2020 Annual Report

EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Board of Directors to receive and file the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan 2020 Annual Report.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION: RCA prepares an annual report as part of its requirements to the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP or the Plan). The annual report provides a formal opportunity to assess the progress of the Plan and to address potential problems. This annual report, once received and filed by the Board, will be available to all MSHCP Permittees, Wildlife Agencies, and interested public on the RCA website (https://www.wrc-rca.org/document-library/annual-reports/).

The MSHCP Plan Area is 1.2 million acres. Within the Plan area, the MSHCP calls for a 500,000-acre reserve system for the 146 species covered by the Plan, some of which are listed as endangered or threatened under the federal and/or state Endangered Species Acts. When the MSHCP was permitted in 2004, 347,000 acres came into the MSHCP reserve system classified as Public/Quasi-Public (PQP) lands. These lands are owned and managed by public entities including Riverside County Parks and Open Space, Bureau of Land Management, State Parks and Wildlife Areas, Metropolitan Water District (e.g., Lake Mathews Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan, Multi-Species Reserve), and United States Forest Service. The additional 153,000 acres needed to complete the 500,000-acre reserve are intended to be acquired through a combination of local, state, and federal mechanisms. RCA is responsible for acquiring 97,000 acres via the Habitat Acquisition Negotiation Strategy (HANS) and willing seller transactions, both funded by the Local Development Mitigation Fee (LDMF) imposed by RCA Member Agencies. Federal and state government are responsible for acquiring a combined 56,000 acres.

The purpose of the MSHCP is to streamline public infrastructure and private commercial, industrial, and residential development. Project consistency with the MSHCP provides “take”

114

Agenda Item 8

under the Endangered Species Acts (state and federal) and biological resources mitigation under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

A foundational element of the MSHCP is to maintain a balance between habitat losses (project development) and habitat gains (reserve assembly) within nine identified regions (Rough Step Units) of the Plan Area. This is done through the Rough Step Analysis, whereby Permittees submit their annual losses (project approvals) to the RCA and the RCA runs the Rough Step analysis to determine the rate of losses to gains in habitat. When a vegetation community tracked by Rough Step becomes out of balance, the Permittees must conserve lands supporting this vegetation to get back into Rough Step prior to authorizing additional loss of the vegetation type within any cells within that Rough Step unit.

Producing the annual report takes approximately one-year following the end of each calendar year. RCA staff collects land use permit data from all Permittees and property acquisition information from the RCTC Right of Way department. Staff runs multiple calculations to determine habitat gains and losses. Further, staff collects data from the management and monitoring programs to assess the condition of the MSHCP reserve and the 146 covered species.

Below provides a summary of the results presented in the 2020 annual report.

In summary:

• In 2020, a total of 981 acres were acquired, donated, or obtained for the MSHCP reserve through the local development process. The total of Additional Reserve Lands (ARL) acquired for conservation under the Plan through 2020 equals 62,798 acres. An additional 90,202 acres is needed to complete the 500,000-acre reserve.

• The RCA processed Joint Project Reviews (JPR) for land use projects being processed by Permittees within the Criteria Area in 2020. JPRs are part of HANS. The RCA received 32 in 2020.

• The RCA updated its GIS database through 2020, identifying 13,842 acres that have been designated as dedications for future ARL (reserve assembly) through the HANS/JPR process since the inception of the MSHCP in 2004.

• Rough Step Units 3, 5, 7, and 8 are out of balance. The RCA is currently pursuing land acquisitions to rectify the issue as soon as feasible. RCA has notified affected Permittees of the impacts that may occur to development until Rough Step is back in balance.

• The RCA, through a contract with the Riverside County Regional Park and Open-Space District, is managing over 42,000 acres of conservation lands. Trespassing, illegal dumping, and homeless encampments continue to plague areas within the reserve system.

• In 2020, the Monitoring Program, conducted by the RCA through a contract with the Santa Ana Watershed Association, recorded 89 of the 146 covered species. Since inception of the Plan, a total of 141 of the 146 covered species has been detected in the MSHCP reserve.

• Annual training was not provided to Permittees and Consultants in 2020 due to COVID-19. Staff is preparing to reestablish training in the later part of 2022.

115

Agenda Item 8

FISCAL IMPACT: This is an information item. There is no fiscal impact. Attachment: 2020 Annual Report

116

BLANK

117

Cover Picture

RCA’s Dawson Creek property, acquired in 2020, is located south of the Lake Mathews/Estelle Mountain Reserve and east of Temescal Canyon

118

Western Riverside County MULTIPLE SPECIES HABITAT

CONSERVATION PLAN

ANNUAL REPORT

For the Period

January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020

Submitted by the

Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority

119

TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page

Western Riverside County MSHCP

Annual Report (January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020) TOC-1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................... ES-1 1.0 INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Overview of the Plan ........................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Reporting Requirements ...................................................................................... 1-3 1.3 Methods................................................................................................................ 1-5 2.0 HABITAT GAINS ......................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Conservation Summary ........................................................................................ 2-2 2.2 Conservation by Jurisdiction................................................................................ 2-4 2.3 Conservation by Area Plan .................................................................................. 2-5 2.4 Conservation and Acquisition Trends .................................................................. 2-6 2.5 Development Projects and Future Conservation ................................................. 2-7 3.0 HABITAT LOSSES ....................................................................................................... 3-1 3.1 Permittee Development Activities ....................................................................... 3-1 3.2 Development Activities by Area Plan.................................................................. 3-4 3.3 Agricultural Activities ......................................................................................... 3-6 4.0 ROUGH STEP ............................................................................................................... 4-1 4.1 Rough Step Unit 1 ................................................................................................ 4-7 4.2 Rough Step Unit 2 .............................................................................................. 4-10 4.3 Rough Step Unit 3 .............................................................................................. 4-13 4.4 Rough Step Unit 4 .............................................................................................. 4-16 4.5 Rough Step Unit 5 .............................................................................................. 4-19 4.6 Rough Step Unit 6 .............................................................................................. 4-22 4.7 Rough Step Unit 7 .............................................................................................. 4-25 4.8 Rough Step Unit 8 .............................................................................................. 4-28 4.9 Rough Step Unit 9 .............................................................................................. 4-31 5.0 ACTIVITIES WITHIN PLAN AREA ......................................................................... 5-1 5.1 Single-Family/Mobile Home Activity ................................................................. 5-1 5.2 Public Works Projects .......................................................................................... 5-3 5.3 Participating Special Entity Permits .................................................................... 5-5 5.4 Criteria Refinement .............................................................................................. 5-5

120




5.5 Agency Cooperation ............................................................................................ 5-5 5.6 Clerical/Minor Amendments to the MSHCP ....................................................... 5-7 5.7 Fires, Floods, and Drought................................................................................... 5-8 5.8 Activities Affecting Reserve Assembly ............................................................. 5-10 6.0 FUNDING SUMMARY................................................................................................. 5-1 7.0 MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES ................................................................................... 7-1 7.1 Management Goal ................................................................................................ 7-1 7.2 General Management Activities .......................................................................... 7-1 7.3 Reserve Management Units ................................................................................. 7-2 7.4 Reserve Management Staffing ............................................................................ 7-4 7.5 RCA Managed Properties .................................................................................... 7-5 7.6 Property Assessments .......................................................................................... 7-6 7.7 Habitat Protection and Site Security .................................................................... 7-7 7.8 Management Activity Data Sheets (MADS) ..................................................... 7-12 7.9 Management Coordination................................................................................. 7-12 7.10 Habitat Enhancement ......................................................................................... 7-13 7.11 Lands Received through Federal Clean Water Act Section 404 Permits and Federal Endangered Species Act Section 7 Consultations ............................................. 7-16 7.12 Future Management Activities ........................................................................... 7-25 8.0 MONITORING ACTIVITIES ..................................................................................... 8-1 8.1 Goals and Objectives ........................................................................................... 8-1 8.2 Inventory Phase and Long-term Monitoring Phase ............................................ 8-1 8.3 Monitoring Program Operations .......................................................................... 8-2 8.4 Summary of 2020 Monitoring Activities and Evaluation of Progress toward Achieving Measurable Objectives ........................................ 8-5 8.5 Additional Survey Reports ................................................................................. 8-27 8.6 Recommendations and Feedback for Adaptive Management ........................... 8-28 8.7 Acknowledgements ............................................................................................ 8-32 9.0 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................... 9-1

121




LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A RCA MSHCP Technical Reports ............................................................................... A-1 1. GIS Methodology, Process and Procedures ........................................................ A-1 2. Monitoring Program Survey Results ................................................................. A-1 3. Clerical Amendments to the MSHCP ................................................................. A-2 4. Agricultural Operations Database ...................................................................... A-2 5. Conservation by Area Plan Subunits ................................................................. A-2 6. Contact Information ............................................................................................ A-7 Appendix B Section 8.0 Tables ..........................................................................................................B-1 B-1. Access Agreements for 2020 Surveys .................................................................B-2 B-2. Details of Covered Species Monitoring ..............................................................B-4 B-3. Status of Covered Species Monitoring – Not Adequately Conserved ...............B-46 Appendix C Staff Training ................................................................................................................C-1 LIST OF FIGURES ES-1 Conservation Acres to Date ...........................................................................................ES-3 1-1 MSHCP Plan Area and Bioregions .................................................................................. 1-2 1-2 MSHCP Public/Quasi-Public Conserved Lands and Additional Reserve Lands ............ 1-3 2-1 Total Cumulative Acreage Contributions by Federal, State, and Local Jurisdictions ..... 2-4 2-2 Joint Project Review (JPR) Process ................................................................................. 2-8 3-1 Area Plan Boundaries within the MSHCP ....................................................................... 3-4 4-1 Western Riverside County MSHCP Rough Step Analysis Units .................................... 4-3 4-2 Rough Step Unit 1 ............................................................................................................ 4-9 4-3 Rough Step Unit 2 .......................................................................................................... 4-12 4-4 Rough Step Unit 3 .......................................................................................................... 4-15

122




4-5 Rough Step Unit 4 .......................................................................................................... 4-18 4-6 Rough Step Unit 5 .......................................................................................................... 4-21 4-7 Rough Step Unit 6 .......................................................................................................... 4-24 4-8 Rough Step Unit 7 .......................................................................................................... 4-27 4-9 Rough Step Unit 8 .......................................................................................................... 4-30 4-10 Rough Step Unit 9 .......................................................................................................... 4-33 5-1 2020 ERP Impact on Criteria Vegetation ........................................................................ 5-2 5-2 Short-Interval Return Fire Areas on MSHCP Conservation Area ................................... 5-9 7-1 Reserve Habitat Management Units (HMU) ................................................................... 7-3 7-2 Acres by Habitat Management Unit (HMU) ................................................................... 7-4 7-3 The IDA Lane and Welsh properties .............................................................................. 7-6 7-4 Typical Issues remedied: RCA Konno and Eustachio Properties .................................... 7-7 7-5 OHV Contacts at the KB River Donation and Terra Investors Properties ...................... 7-9 7-6 Discarded Used Motor Oil on RCA Kisling Enterprises Property and Homeless

Encampment at RCA Oak Valley Partners Property ..................................................... 7-10 7-7 Bike Patrols at RCA Bautista Canyon Property and Unauthorized bike bridge at RCA

Cornerstone Property ..................................................................................................... 7-11 7-8 Marijuana Grow Encroachment at RCA Higgins Property and Debris from old grow site at

RCA Aqua Tibia Property. ............................................................................................ 7-12 7-9 Stinknet Herbicide Treatment at RCA Carlsbad Property and Post Treatment at RCA Sey

Property. ......................................................................................................................... 7-14 7-10 Staff Preparing the RCA San Jacinto River Ranchos Meadows at Lone Cone for San

Bernardino Kangaroo Rat translocation study. .............................................................. 7-15 8-1a Burrowing Owl Burrows Monitored in the Lake Skinner/Diamond Valley Lake Core Area During 2020 Pair Count Surveys ..................................................................................... 8-9 8-1b Burrowing Owl Burrows Monitored in the San Jacinto Wildlife/Mystic Lake Core Area During 2020 Pair Count Surveys ................................................................................... 8-10 8-2 Clinton Keith Overcrossing and Undercrossing Camera Locations in 2020 ................. 8-15 8-3 Long-tailed Weasel Station Locations in 2020 .............................................................. 8-18 8-4 2019-2020 Herpetofauna Bureau of Land Management Array Locations .................... 8-22 8-5 2020 Vegetation Assessments at the Hemet and Perris Alkali Vernal Playas. .............. 8-25 LIST OF TABLES ES-1 RCA Revenue and Expenditures ...................................................................................ES-2

123




ES-2 Land Acquisition Funding Expended ............................................................................ES-2 ES-3 Rough Step Summary ....................................................................................................ES-4 2-1 MSHCP Conservation Summary by Year ....................................................................... 2-3 2-2 Conservation (ARL) Targets by Jurisdiction ................................................................... 2-5 2-3 Conservation (ARL) Targets by Area Plan ...................................................................... 2-6 3-1 Habitat Loss by Jurisdiction (New Losses to the MSHCP issued between January 1,

2020, and December 31, 2020) ........................................................................................ 3-2 3-2 Habitat Losses by Jurisdiction Cumulative (June 22, 2004 – December 31, 2020) ........ 3-3 3-3 Habitat Losses by Area Plan (New Losses to the MSHCP issued between January 1, 2020, and December 31, 2020) ........................................................................................ 3-5 3-4 Habitat Losses by Area Plan Cumulative (June 22, 2004 – December 31, 2020) ........... 3-6 3-5 Agricultural Grading Summary ....................................................................................... 3-7 4-1 Habitat Losses In/Out of Criteria Area by Rough Step Unit in 2020 (January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020) ........................................................................................... 4-1 4-2 Rough Step Acreage Summary ....................................................................................... 4-5 4-3 Rough Step 1 Acreage Totals .......................................................................................... 4-7 4-4 Delhi Soils Acreage Analysis (Species Account Objective 1B) ..................................... 4-8 4-5 Rough Step 2 Acreage Totals ........................................................................................ 4-10 4-6 Rough Step 3 Acreage Totals ........................................................................................ 4-13 4-7 Rough Step 4 Acreage Totals ........................................................................................ 4-16 4-8 Rough Step 5 Acreage Totals ........................................................................................ 4-19 4-9 Rough Step 6 Acreage Totals ........................................................................................ 4-22 4-10 Rough Step 7 Acreage Totals ........................................................................................ 4-25 4-11 Rough Step 8 Acreage Totals ........................................................................................ 4-28 4-12 Rough Step 9 Acreage Totals ........................................................................................ 4-31 5-1 Public Works Projects (January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020) ........................... 5-4 5-2 Short-Interval Return Fires on MSHCP Conserved Area ................................................ 5-9 6-1 2020 RCA Program Operation Financial Summary ........................................................ 5-1 6-2 Permittee Revenue (January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020) ................................ 5-4 7-1 RCA Managed Properties Added to the Reserve Inventory in 2020 ............................... 7-5 8-1 Summary of species captured at BLM array ACECHA-1 ............................................. 8-20 8-2 Summary of species captured at BLM array ACECHA-2 ............................................. 8-20 8-3 Summary of species captured at BLM array ACECHA-3 ............................................. 8-20

124

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY


Annual Report (January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020) ES-1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP or Plan) is a comprehensive, multi-jurisdictional plan that conserves vulnerable plant and animal species and associated habitats in western Riverside County. The Plan was approved in 2003 and the permits were issued on June 22, 2004 by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW). The MSHCP Planning Area encompasses approximately 1.26 million acres in western Riverside County. The Plan calls for the conservation and management of approximately 500,000 acres within the Plan Area. Of the 500,000 acres, approximately 347,000 acres of land within Public/Quasi-Public (PQP) ownership came into the Reserve at inception of the MSHCP in 2004. Achievement of the 500,000-acre goal depends on conservation of 153,000 acres of Additional Reserve Lands (ARL) within the Plan Area that would occur through federal, state, and locally funded acquisitions. The Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority (RCA) was formed in January 2004 and assumed administration and implementation responsibility for the MSHCP in March 2004. The MSHCP requires that the RCA prepare and submit a report of its annual activities. This report provides a summary of activities for the reporting period of January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020. This is the 16th annual report that covers a full calendar year of Plan implementation. The 2020 Annual Report provides a means of evaluating the effectiveness of MSHCP implementation and the success of the RCA during the year.

Reporting Requirements In addition to reporting the amount of habitat conserved and developed during the reporting period, this report includes other information that measures MSHCP progress. At a minimum, the MSHCP specifies that the Annual Report include: • Reserve Assembly activities in relation to the Rough Step formulas presented in Section

6.7 of the MSHCP (Volume 1) and in accordance with Species-Specific Objective 1B of the Delhi sands flower-loving fly.

• Acres authorized for disturbance within the Plan Area during the reporting period.

• Single-family and mobile home activity within the Criteria Area for the year and cumulatively since inception of the Plan occurring under the Expedited Review Process (ERP) for these activities presented in Section 6.1.1 of the MSHCP (Volume 1).

125

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY



• New or expanded agricultural operations within the Criteria Area for the preceding year and cumulatively occurring under the processes identified in Section 6.2 of the MSHCP (Volume 1).

• Minor administrative/clerical amendments approved during the reporting period in accordance with the procedures described in Section 6.10.2 of the MSHCP (Volume 1).

• Ongoing management and monitoring activities highlighting issues of concern and proposed remedies/actions.

• Documentation concerning funding/collection of mitigation fees.

Funding Summary Table ES-1 RCA Revenue and Expenditures

2020 Cumulative (2004-2020) Revenue $25,102,163 $474,807,425 Expenditures* $23,684,238 $635,802,430

*Includes costs incurred before Plan inception and state and federal cost of acquisition which are not RCA direct costs.

Table ES-2 Land Acquisition Funding Expended* 2020 Cumulative (2004-2020) Local Permittees+ $14,311,000 $378,195,166 State $395,500 $102,583,699 Federal $734,500 $61,601,062

*Includes costs incurred before Plan inception and state and federal cost of acquisition which are not RCA direct costs. +Only includes land acquisition costs. Other costs related to the acquisition including appraisals are not included. Table ES-1 revenues include development fees, landfill revenue, and infrastructure mitigation fees. Expenditures include costs for land acquisition, land management, species monitoring, and program administration. Table ES-2 shows the land acquisition expenditures by local permittees, the state, and the federal government. For details, please see Section 6 of this report.

126

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY



Reserve Assembly Summary Figure ES-1 Conservation Acres to Date

In 2020, a total of 981 acres of ARL was acquired, donated, or obtained through the local development process. Cumulatively, as of December 31, 2020, a total of 62,798 acres of ARL has been conserved for purposes of habitat and species conservation. In 2020, a total of 777 acres of habitat was lost due to development within the plan criteria area. The losses amount to 22% of all land development within Western Riverside County. The majority of the development losses (2,733 or 78%) happened outside the plan criteria area, and do not affect reserve assembly.

127

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY



Rough Step Summary The “Rough Step” tool is one way to measure the performance of the MSHCP. The purpose of Rough Step is to help direct conservation of vegetation communities with similar weather patterns, geographies, soils, and geologies as development occurs. The Rough Step measure is intended to ensure that conservation efforts are in balance with development within potential areas of conservation. The Rough Step analysis functions as a signal where development is outpacing conservation and where conservation efforts therefore need to be focused. All Rough Step analyses is based on the 1994 baseline vegetation mapping used to develop the MSHCP and take allowances for species.

Table ES-3 Rough Step Summary

Rough Step Status Out of Rough Step Vegetation

Categories Acres Needed for

Rough Step Balance Rough Step Unit 1 In Rough Step - - Rough Step Unit 2 In Rough Step - - Rough Step Unit 3 Out of Rough Step Riversidean Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub 2.92 Rough Step Unit 4 In Rough Step - - Rough Step Unit 5 Out of Rough Step Riparian Scrub, Woodland, Forest 2.23 Rough Step Unit 6 In Rough Step - - Rough Step Unit 7 Out of Rough Step Riversidean Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub 23.74 Rough Step Unit 8 Out of Rough Step Grasslands 130.33 Rough Step Unit 9 n/a - -

Reserve Management In 2020, the RCA continued its security, protection, and enhancement of existing and new RCA lands brought into the MSHCP Reserve. At the end of 2020, the RCA was managing over 42,000 acres of conservation lands. The RCA utilizes a contract with the Riverside County Regional Park and Open-Space District to manage the RCA properties. Activities during the reporting period focused on the establishment and maintenance of access controls in high trespass areas, installation of fencing and gates, maintain acquired lands in conditions similar to or better than when acquired, removal of non-native invasive species and restore natural habitat using seeding, pole cuttings, transplanting, and/or passive restoration , and conduct fire abatement activities in compliance with County Ordinance 695 or other jurisdictions as applicable to the location of the land.

128

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY



Management activities for the MSHCP occur on two levels: habitat/landscape-based and species-specific based. The MSHCP Management Team focuses on the balance between managing the overall landscape of the RCA lands, along with making sure that specific species requirements are also met. In 2020, MSHCP Reserve Management practices incorporated Adaptive Management methodologies to improve habitat or species knowledge (e.g., San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat translocation at the San Jacinto River, alkali playa stinknet plant eradication). As more lands come into the MSHCP Reserve and the Monitoring Program data is more complete, MSHCP Reserve Managers will be able to develop and incorporate additional adaptive management activities.

Biological Monitoring Program The overall goal of the Biological Monitoring Program (Monitoring Program) is to collect data on the 146 Covered Species and associated vegetation communities to assess the MSHCP’s effectiveness at meeting conservation objectives and provide information to the Adaptive Management Program. The Species Accounts in the MSHCP (Volume 2) includes species-specific objectives that are intended to provide for the long-term conservation of all Covered Species. Species objectives influence the type and intensity of monitoring that is conducted by the Monitoring Program. Management decisions or actions are triggered if species objectives or MSHCP goals are not met. The RCA assumed funding of the Monitoring Program in 2012 when the State Wildlife Grant ended. The exception to this is the one full time avian lead position that continues to be funded by CDFW. The transition from inventory phase to long-term monitoring phase continued in 2020. For those species that have frequent monitoring and reporting requirements, such as Quino checkerspot butterfly (annual) or coastal California gnatcatcher (every three years), we have moved out of the transition phase to the inventory phase, meaning development of the approach and protocols for best monitoring these species has been vetted and established. For other species that have longer periods between monitoring and reporting (e.g., 8-year cycle) the Monitoring Program continues in the inventory phase, fine-tuning approaches and protocols on how best acquire the data needed for long-term monitoring and thus, transition from the inventory phase to the long-term monitoring phase. Los Angeles pocket mouse is such a species, with species-specific monitoring objectives requiring significant development and testing. The strategy for long-term monitoring includes survey protocols that maximize efficiency by collecting information on multiple species where possible. For example, bird species co-occurring in similar habitat (e.g., willow riparian) during the breeding season can be detected using the same protocol. Some Covered Species occur in isolated pockets within the Conservation Area or are difficult to detect using standard survey protocols (e.g., Delhi sands flower-loving fly). Focused

129

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY



surveys are required for these species. The Monitoring Program also makes use of species habitat models to the fullest extent possible to make surveys optimally efficient and to collaborate with partnering agencies conducting relevant research or monitoring for Covered Species to avoid overlapping efforts. In 2020, the Monitoring Program recorded, either through focused surveys or incidental detections, 89 of 146 Covered Species. Since June 2004, a total of 141 of 146 Covered Species have been detected in the Conservation Area (135 as a result of focused Monitoring Program surveys, five incidentally observed by Monitoring Program biologists, and one additional Covered Species reported by partnering agencies).

130

1.0 INTRODUCTION


Annual Report (January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020) 1-1

1. INTRODUCTION

1.1. Overview of the Plan The Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP, the Plan) is a comprehensive, multi-jurisdictional plan that conserves species and associated habitats to address biological diversity and ecological conservation needs while improving Riverside County transportation by expediting freeway and road projects by as many as five years and streamlining public and private development approvals in western Riverside County. The Plan provides for mitigation under the federal and state Endangered Species Acts (ESAs) as well as the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). From Burrowing Owl (Athene cunicularia) to the Western Pond Turtle (Clemmys marmorata pallida), the MSHCP protects 146 animal and plant species including 33 that are threatened or endangered, making it the largest habitat conservation plan in the United States. The MSHCP includes 38 specially designated habitat linkages that allow animals to safely move from one preserve to another, providing critical lifeline between habitats that serve as escape routes from danger and pathways to food supplies. This Plan was developed in conjunction with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW), the United Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), multiple local jurisdictions, various state, federal and local agencies, and public interest groups/stakeholders. The Plan was approved, and permits were issued on June 22, 2004 by the USFWS and CDFW. The MSHCP Plan Area encompasses approximately 1.26 million acres (approximately 1,967 square miles) in western Riverside County. This Plan includes all land west of the crest of the San Jacinto Mountains and east of the Orange/Riverside County line. The northern border of the Plan Area consists of the Riverside/San Bernardino County line, and the southern border consists of the Riverside/San Diego County line. The Plan Area includes all unincorporated County of Riverside land within this geographic area, as well as the incorporated cities of Banning, Beaumont, Calimesa, Canyon Lake, Corona, Eastvale, Hemet, Jurupa Valley, Lake Elsinore, Menifee, Moreno Valley, Murrieta, Norco, Perris, Riverside, San Jacinto, Temecula, and Wildomar. The Plan includes diverse landscapes from urban cities to undeveloped foothills and montane forests. Bioregions within the Plan Area include portions of the Santa Ana Mountains, Riverside Lowlands, San Jacinto Foothills, San Jacinto Mountains, Agua Tibia Mountains, Desert Transition, and San Bernardino Mountains (Figure 1-1).

131

1.0 INTRODUCTION



The MSHCP calls for the conservation and management of approximately 500,000 acres of the 1.26 million-acre Plan Area. Of the 500,000 acres, 347,000 acres were in Public/Quasi-Public ownership at the time the plan was adopted (Figure 1-2). The 347,000 acres include national forest, state parks, county parks, nature reserves, and state wildlife areas. Achievement of the 500,000-acre goal depends on conservation of an additional 153,000 acres within the Plan Area. The acquisition of the 153,000 acres of Additional Reserve Lands (ARL) has been ongoing since 2000 (prior to Plan approval). The Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority (RCA) administers the MSHCP along with the other Permittees (e.g., County of Riverside, 18 cities) of the Plan. The RCA is a Joint Powers Authority (JPA) responsible for acquiring acres necessary for meeting the local Plan goals, monitoring the 500,000-acre Reserve, managing the RCA-owned ARL, overseeing Plan compliance, and assisting with MSHCP implementation across the Plan Area.

132

1.0 INTRODUCTION



1.2. Reporting Requirements The MSHCP requires that the RCA prepare and submit a report of its annual activities. This report provides a summary of MSHCP implementation activities for the 16th full year of RCA operation: January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020. Per the MSHCP, the annual report must include a description of: • Reserve assembly activities in relation to the Rough Step formula presented in Section 6.7

of the MSHCP (Volume 1) and as revised in Minor Amendment 2007-01. Rough Step is a tool to help direct conservation as development occurs. It is a tracking tool to ensure that

133

1.0 INTRODUCTION



development does not proceed at a pace that would preclude achieving the conservation goals for specific key vegetation communities within the Plan boundary.

• The number of acres authorized for disturbance and the acres conserved allows the RCA and Permittees to determine the rate of development and conservation occurring in distinct geographic areas.

• New single-family and mobile home activity on existing parcels of land within the Criteria Area for the reporting year and cumulatively occurring under the Expedited Review Process (ERP) for these activities presented in Section 6.1.1 of the MSHCP (Volume 1). Applications for a single-family home grading permit or for a mobile home site preparation permit on existing parcels of land within the Criteria Area are subject to review against the MSHCP conservation criteria to determine the least-sensitive location for the building pad and necessary access roadways. This review process is referred to as the ERP and, with approval under this process, applicable properties are referred to as “ERPs.” The MSHCP included ERP activity assumptions (i.e., number of permits and acres disturbed) (Section 7.3.2 of the MSHCP, Volume 1). The annual reporting process is used to determine whether ERP activity is occurring in a manner that is consistent with the assumptions made during MSHCP development. Furthermore, an analysis of ERP activity allows the RCA to determine if Reserve Assembly within the Criteria Area is being adversely impacted by ERPs. Refer to Section 4.1 for more information.

• New or expanded commercial agricultural operations within the Criteria Area for the reporting year and cumulatively occurring under the processes identified in Section 6.2 of the MSHCP (Volume 1). Existing agricultural uses and conversion of natural lands to agricultural use are allowed as Covered Activities within the Criteria Area in Section 7.3.3 of the MSHCP (Volume I). New conversions to agricultural use within the Criteria Area are covered up to an established threshold of 10,000 acres over the life of the Plan. The annual reporting process is used to periodically measure new commercial agricultural activities against the 10,000-acre threshold, and to analyze potential impacts to Reserve Assembly associated with these new agricultural activities.

• Minor Administrative/Clerical Amendments approved in accordance with the procedures described in Section 6.10.2 of the MSHCP (Volume 1). The annual report provides a method to officially document such amendments.

• Ongoing management and monitoring activities highlighting issues of concern and proposed remedies/actions.

134

1.0 INTRODUCTION



1.3. Methods RCA staff work with each member agency (the 18 cities and County of Riverside) to build a Geographic Information System (GIS) database of relevant conservation and development activity, which is used to calculate performance measures. For annual reporting purposes, conservation is counted as a gain when acquired through transfer of title, recordation of conservation easement, or conservation through a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with an entity that will manage their property pursuant to the terms of the MSHCP. This annual report presents the year 2020 and cumulative gains in conservation between February 2000 and December 31, 2020. Development losses are counted at the time of grading permit issuance. This annual report presents year 2020 and cumulative losses between June 22, 2004 and December 31, 2020. As stated above, losses are usually counted earlier in the development process (at time of grading permit issuance), and gains may be counted at the end of the development process (generally at time of fee title transfer/conservation easement recordation at the County Recorder’s Office; time of occupancy). Because of this, the amount of habitat losses may appear greater as they are reported before the habitat gains can be reported to offset those losses.

135

2.0 HABITAT GAINS



2.0 HABITAT GAINS Habitat gains are lands that go into permanent conservation pursuant to the Plan and specifically count towards the completion of the 153,000 acres of ARL being assembled from a variety of sources including: • Private land acquisitions through the Habitat Acquisition Negotiation Strategy (HANS)

process; • Acquisitions from willing sellers; • Donations of fee title or conservation easements; and • Entities with conservation lands managed pursuant to the MSHCP with a MOU between

the entity and the RCA. Once habitat gains in the form of 153,000 acres of ARL has occurred plus the 347,000 acres of PQP that came into the MSHCP reserve at inception of the Plan, the 500,000-acre MSHCP reserve will be completed. ARL is managed specifically for species and habitats while PQP lands can have multiple management foci, such as open space recreation and conservation. The MSHCP allows passive recreation on trails existing at the time of acquisition of ARL, but the focus is species and habitat management in perpetuity. Cumulative habitat gains (or conservation) are reported from the period February 2000 through December 31, 2020. February 2000 is used as the start of the gain reporting period because in anticipation of MSHCP permit issuance, the County, CDFW, California Department of Parks and Recreation, and the USFWS, began an early, aggressive campaign to assemble the ARL prior to Plan permit issuance. Habitat gains do not occur randomly within the MSHCP Plan boundary. Instead, there are specific areas within the Plan that have conservation objectives called Criteria Area. There is a checkerboard pattern of Criteria Cells for which the MSHCP establishes conservation criteria that guide how habitat gains/ARL should occur to ensure the ultimate reserve achieves the 146 species objectives required by the MSHCP. Each Criteria Cell is approximately 160 acres in size (one quarter section; a tract of land that is half a mile square and contains 160 acres in the U.S. government system of land surveying). In 2012, RCA developed a policy on conserved lands outside of Criteria Cells counting as ARL and toward Rough Step analysis in consultation with the Wildlife Agencies (CDFW, USFWS). The policy allows conserved lands outside Criteria Cells to be counted as ARL under certain circumstances with Wildlife Agency concurrence. In general, the lands must be biologically valuable and occur directly adjacent to existing ARL or PQP within Criteria Cells. This policy was

136

2.0 HABITAT GAINS



an important step in allowing lands outside of the Criteria Area to come into conservation to help meet MSHCP goals. Not all entities with land use authority within the MSHCP Plan boundary are Permittees of the Plan and as such do not receive the benefits of the MSHCP and do not have to follow the Plan. This means that not all lands described for conservation within the MSHCP may necessarily come into the MSHCP reserve. Therefore, the 2012 policy was an important step in being able to achieve the species objectives of the MSHCP.

2.1. Conservation Summary In 2020, a total of 981 acres of ARL was acquired, donated, or obtained through the local development process. Cumulatively, as of December 31, 2020, a total of 62,798 acres of ARL has been conserved for purposes of habitat and species conservation. Table 2-1, MSHCP Conservation Summary by Year, provides a snapshot of the conservation activity completed through December 31, 2020.

137

2.0 HABITAT GAINS



Table 2-1 MSHCP Conservation Summary by Year

Time Period ARL Acres Reported in

Annual Reports Reconciled ARL Acres

Conserved by Year February 2000 – June 22, 2004 17,901* 16,939

June 22, 2004 – December 31, 2004 1,370* 1,331 January 1, 2005 – December 31, 2005 4,112* 4,002 January 1, 2006 – December 31, 2006 9,873* 9,853 January 1, 2007 – December 31, 2007 3,687* 3,683 January 1, 2008 – December 31, 2008 4,077* 4,083 January 1, 2009 - December 31, 2009 1,712* 1,712 January 1, 2010 – December 31, 2010 1,431* 1,431 January 1, 2011 – December 31, 2011 1,664* 1,665 January 1, 2012 – December 31, 2012 1,075 1,073 January 1, 2013 – December 31, 2013 1,085 1,085 January 1, 2014 – December 31, 2014 1,842* 1,842 January 1, 2015 – December 31, 2015 1,186 1,186 January 1, 2016 – December 31, 2016 4,799 4,799 January 1, 2017 – December 31, 2017 3,586 3,587 January 1, 2018 – December 31, 2018 2,066 2,066 January 1, 2019 – December 31, 2019 1,481 1,481 January 1, 2020 – December 31, 2020 981 981

Adjusted Total** 63,928 62,798

* The acres reported as conserved have been refined which resulted in minor changes from the reported totals in previous annual reports. The changes are mainly due to accounting for some lands that were acquired outside of Criteria Cells and corrections to acreage totals for selected acquisitions.

** Totals may not add up due to rounding. Many of the MSHCP covered species and associated sensitive habitats were located on federal and state lands (e.g., United States Forest Service, State Parks) prior to the MSHCP. For these reasons, these lands were included in the 347,000 acres of PQP at the time of Plan inception. However, pursuant to the Plan, additional conservation gains are required, equaling 153,000 acres of ARL. These ARL gains are shared amongst the federal, state, and local permittees with the federal and state shared contribution being 56,000 acres and the local contribution being 97,000 acres. The contributions by federal, state, and local entities are shown in Figure 2-1, Total Cumulative Acreage Contribution by Federal, State, and Local Jurisdictions.

138

2.0 HABITAT GAINS



As of December 31, 2020, the federal agencies have contributed 9,251 acres and the state agencies have contributed 12,437 acres toward the 153,000-acre ARL conservation goal of the MSHCP. The local permittee contribution (occurring through recordation of conservation easements, acquisitions from willing sellers, donations, or acquisition of property from private developers through HANS or equivalent process) totaled 41,110 acres toward the ARL conservation goal of the MSHCP.

2.2. Conservation by Jurisdiction The MSHCP contains targets to measure Plan performance within local government jurisdictions (cities, unincorporated County of Riverside). Table 2-2, Conservation Targets by Jurisdiction, provides a conservation summary for 2020, as well as cumulative conservation by jurisdiction (from February 2000 to the end of 2020). New cities and annexations do not have goals under Section 3.3 of the MSHCP (Volume 1) and instead inherit the goals of individual criteria cells that fall within their City jurisdiction, if any.

Local41,110 Acres

State12,437 Acres

Federal9,251 Acres

Figure 2-1Total Cumulative Acreage ContributionsFederal, State, and Local Jurisdictions

139

2.0 HABITAT GAINS



Table 2-2 Conservation (ARL) Targets by Jurisdiction

Jurisdiction Low End Acres

of Goals High End Acres

of Goals

Total ARL Acres Conserved

in 2020

Total ARL Acres Conserved between

February 2000 and December 31,

2020* Banning 50 90 0 0 Beaumont 5,440 9,060 0 8,123 Calimesa 1,240 2,240 0 2,044 Canyon Lake 30 50 0 0 Corona 330 610 0 367 Eastvale* (incorporated 2010) -- -- 0 100 Hemet 620 1,000 25 289 Jurupa Valley* (incorporated 2011) -- -- 11 455 Lake Elsinore 4,830 7,870 138 3,562 Menifee* (incorporated 2008) -- -- 0 0 Moreno Valley 80 130 0 1,030 Murrieta 1,580 3,200 0 1,281 Norco 60 140 0 42 Perris 720 1,400 0 147 Riverside 55 125 0 132 San Jacinto 1,580 2,680 0 1,130 Temecula 600 1,380 12 30 Wildomar* (incorporated 2008) -- -- 0 844 Unincorporated, County of Riverside 107,265 159,800 795 43,223 Totals** 124,480 189,775 981 62,798

* Acquisition goals have not been calculated for cities incorporated since 2004 but remain in County of Riverside goals. Overall reserve assembly goals by Area Plan, Cell Group, and Cell remain and affect newly incorporated cities as applicable.

** Totals may not add up due to rounding.

2.3. Conservation by Area Plan Area Plans are used as an MSHCP performance measure unit to monitor success of Plan implementation. The 16 Area Plans relate to County planning boundaries associated with the Riverside County General Plan. Table 2-3, ARL Conservation Goals by Area Plan, provides a summary of ARL conservation achieved through 2020 (February 2000 to December 31, 2020) by Area Plan, as well as the target conservation acreages identified for each Area Plan in Section 3.3 of the MSHCP (Volume 1). In

140

2.0 HABITAT GAINS



this section of the MSHCP, the target conservation acreages included an overall target conservation acreage that included both PQP lands plus ARL. The low- and high-range targets included in Table 2-3, below reflect only the ARL targets, rather than the overall Area Plan targets. This distinction, for annual reporting purposes, is an additional check-and-balance mechanism for ARL Assembly. As described in earlier in this report, only ARL is being acquired for reserve assembly. PQP acreage was completed at the time the Plan came into inception and is not an important measure of MSHCP performance.

Table 2-3 Conservation (ARL) Targets by Area Plan

Area Plan Low End Acres

of Goal High End Acres

of Goal

Total ARL Acres Conserved in

2020

Total ARL Acres Conserved between February 2000 and December 31, 2020

Eastvale 145 290 0 107 Elsinore 11,700 18,515 146 6,406 Harvest Valley/Winchester 430 605 25 225 Highgrove 345 675 0 463 Jurupa 890 1,870 61 506 Lake Mathews/Woodcrest 3,215 5,470 179 907 Lakeview/Nuevo 6,650 10,235 223 1,056 Mead Valley 1,885 3,635 15 190 Reche Canyon/Badlands 10,520 15,610 0 6,549 REMAP 41,400 58,470 0 20,176 San Jacinto Valley 11,540 19,465 196 7,687 Sun City/Menifee Valley 1,120 1,585 0 527 Southwest 22,500 36,360 136 6,016 Temescal Canyon 3,485 5,800 0 1,398 The Pass 8,540 13,925 0 10,509 Riverside/Norco 90 240 0 76 Total* 124,455 192,750 981 62,798

* Totals may not add up due to rounding.

2.4. Conservation and Acquisition Trends RCA, in conjunction with the Permittees, continues to focus its acquisition and conservation efforts toward meeting Rough Step and ARL goals. The RCA strives to gain ARL at the rate of development and to gain the ARL in-step with vegetation community losses as calculated by the Rough Step analysis. This can be a difficult balance given the nature of acquisition funding. For example, the RCA acquisitions triggered through the development HANS process is contingent

141

2.0 HABITAT GAINS



upon on a development project’s timeline, which can be subject to myriad. Acquisitions are also reliant upon LDMF revenue to RCA, which are heavily influenced by economic conditions pertaining to the housing and commercial development markets in the region. The RCA also works with non-development HANS applicants and willing sellers. Additionally, there is the need to assemble linkages and constrained linkages, which do not always improve the Rough Step numbers but is a requirement of the MSHCP. The RCA continues to work with local Permittees on obtaining donations through the land development process.

2.5. Development Projects and Future Conservation The HANS process, described in Section 6.1.1 of the MSHCP (Volume 1) followed by the Joint Project Review (JPR) process, described in Section 6.6.2.E of the MSHCP (Volume 1), provide the review of development projects proposed in Criteria Cells for consistency with the MSHCP. The HANS and JPR performed by the Permittees and the RCA, respectively, on proposed development projects are used to determine the impacts to MSHCP covered resources and what land, if any needs to go into the reserve as ARL (conserved lands). The HANS/JPR process is the only process whereby projects are reviewed for reserve assembly (ARL contribution). Every proposed project that occurs in a Criteria Cell and is going through approvals from a Permittee of the Plan, must go through HANS with the Member Agency (County, City). Once the Member Agency finds the project consistent with the MSHCP, the Member Agency sends a JPR application for the Project to the RCA. This triggers the JPR process that is performed by the RCA. Once the RCA provides consistency findings, the RCA sends the project to the Wildlife Agencies (USFWS, USFWS) for their JPR. Once the Wildlife Agencies provide their consistency findings, the project has completed the MSHCP consistency process (Figure 2-2). Projects that need to support reserve assembly will be conditioned to do so by the Member Agency. Any proposed projects outside of Criteria Cells do not go through HANS/JPR, but rather perform MSHCP consistency (without reserve assembly) with the Member Agency only.

142

2.0 HABITAT GAINS



Figure 2-2.

143

2.0 HABITAT GAINS



The MSHCP envisioned a total of 41,000 acres to be set aside as ARL through dedication (donation) from development projects. The MSHCP projected that from the beginning of the Plan, that each year approximately 1,640 acres would be conserved as dedication through the development process. In retrospect, this estimate was too aggressive and did not account for the extended time between development project approvals and commencement of construction, or the use of fee credits. During the HANS/JPR review process, a development footprint and proposed areas for conservation are designated within the project area for each project. These designated areas are stored in a JPR database as Proposed MSHCP Conserved Lands and Proposed MSHCP Conservation Easements. The JPR database also includes projects that were designated as 100% conservation. As of December 31, 2020, a total of 13,842 acres are currently designated as future ARL conservation dedications that will occur from development. In 2020, the RCA processed 32 JPRs, resulting in 672 acres of Proposed MSHCP Conserved Lands. This future conservation has not been applied to the Rough Step Analysis but does serve to provide an indication of conservation that will be acquired through the development process in the future. Some projects that include areas of conservation may not be completed for a considerable amount of time.

144

3.0 HABITAT LOSSES

Western Riverside County MSHCP Annual Report (January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020) 3-1

3.0 HABITAT LOSSES

The MSHCP allows for habitat losses to occur with reserve assembly, or habitat gains to also occur in specific areas of the Plan Boundary, called Criteria Area (where the ultimate 153,000-acre ARL is envisioned to be assembled). Refer to Figure 1-2 in Section 1 for the distribution of Criteria Area (in the form of Cells) within the Plan Boundary. Habitat is lost due to residential and commercial development, construction of infrastructure, and other activities that go through a MSHCP consistency review. The tracking of habitat losses began on June 22, 2004, when MSHCP state and federal permits were issued.

3.1 Permittee Development Activities

The Plan Area is 1.26 million acres with approximately 300,000 acres within Criteria Area. Within the Criteria Area, the MSHCP assumed a portion would be developed (approximately 144,000 acres) and that the remainder, 156,000 acres would go into the MSHCP reserve. In 2020, a total of 3,510 acres were approved for development with 2,733 acres of habitat lost outside the Criteria Area and 777 acres of habitat lost within the Criteria Area (Criteria Cells). Table 3-1, Habitat Loss by Jurisdiction (January 1, 2020 – December 31, 2020), and Table 3-2, Habitat Losses by Jurisdiction Cumulative (June 22, 2004 – December 31, 2020), provide summaries of the total new losses that have occurred during 2020 and since Plan inception, respectively. Table 3-1 lists grading/building permits issued by Permittees between January 1 and December 31, 2020, that are new habitat losses to the MSHCP. Multiple types of permits (e.g., building, grading) were issued by the Permittees for various types of land development activities in 2020 and previous years. However, for MSHCP annual reporting purposes, multiple permits issued on one parcel were summarized into one permit per parcel and counted as one loss in Table 3-1 and Table 3-2, below. Parcellation of a single property generates a permit for each new parcel created which is reflected in the high number of permits per acre of development in Tables 3-1 and 3-2.

145

3.0 HABITAT LOSSES


Table 3-1 Habitat Loss by Jurisdiction

(New Losses to the MSHCP between January 1, 2020 and December 31, 2020)

Permittee

Grading/Building Permits Issued

Number of Records Representing


Total Development Acreage

Development Acreage

Outside of Criteria Area

Development Acreage within

Criteria Area

Banning 7 211 211 0 Beaumont 206 456 274 181 Calimesa 11 9 9 0 Canyon Lake 5 1 1 0 Corona 81 182 164 18 Unincorporated County of Riverside 599 1,445 969 476

Eastvale (incorporated 2010) 101 14 14 0 Hemet 84 12 10 3 Jurupa Valley (incorporated 2011) 151 348 319 29

Lake Elsinore 20 29 29 0 Menifee (incorporated 2008) 728 157 157 0 Moreno Valley 30 163 163 0 Murrieta 8 33 8 26 Norco 25 42 31 11 Perris 9 148 141 7 Riverside 121 88 88 0 San Jacinto 65 21 1 20 Temecula 94 103 100 2 Wildomar (incorporated 2008) 90 47 45 2 Total* 2,435 3,510 2,733 777 100% 78% 22%

* All numbers have been rounded to nearest integer. As a result, sum of columns may deviate from total.

146

3.0 HABITAT LOSSES


Table 3-2 Cumulative Habitat Losses by Jurisdiction (June 22, 2004 – December 31, 2020)

Permittee


Number of Records Representing


Total Development

Acreage

Development Acreage Outside

Criteria Area

Development Acreage Inside

Criteria Area Banning 229 832 832 0 Beaumont 3,335 3,468 2,951 517 Calimesa 217 600 491 109 Canyon Lake 195 60 59 1 Corona 773 2,401 2,129 272 Unincorporated County of Riverside 14,266 44,347 32,034 12,313 Eastvale (incorporated 2010) 2,915 3,409 3,250 159 Hemet 674 3,102 2,983 119 Jurupa Valley (incorporated 2011) 1,874 2,809 2,562 247 Lake Elsinore 1,602 3,135 1,807 1,328 Menifee (incorporated 2008) 3,034 5,879 5,868 11 Moreno Valley 468 4,317 4,274 43 Murrieta 929 3,030 1,860 1,169 Norco 256 704 686 18 Perris 689 3,099 2,933 167 Riverside 2,532 3,062 3,040 22 San Jacinto 501 1,802 1,594 207 Temecula 1,889 2,088 1,678 410 Wildomar (incorporated 2008) 1,381 1,475 1,343 132 Total* 37,759 89,620 72,376 17,244

100% 81% 19% * All numbers have been rounded to nearest integer. As a result, sum of columns may deviate from total.

The tables above show that in 2020 (Table 3-1) 78% and cumulatively (Table 3-2) 81% of the development occurred outside of the Criteria Areas, which means the majority of losses are not occurring within the areas considered for Conservation.

147

3.0 HABITAT LOSSES


3.2 Development Activities by Area Plan Area Plans are used as an MSHCP performance measure unit to monitor success of Plan implementation. The 16 Area Plans relate to County planning boundaries associated with the Riverside County General Plan (Figure 3-1. Area Plan Boundaries within the MSHCP). Losses from development by Area Plan boundaries are summarized in Table 3-3. Habitat Losses by Area Plan (New Losses to the MSHCP between January 1, 2020 and December 31, 2020) and Table 3-4. Habitat Losses by Area Plan Cumulative (June 22, 2004 – December 31, 2020). Although the overall development within and across years has been heavily weighted towards areas outside of MSHCP Criteria Areas, there are two Area Plans that have had higher development within the Criteria Area (i.e., areas potentially needed for the MSHCP reserve), namely Highgrove and REMAP (Table 3-4).

Figure 3-1. Area Plan Boundaries within the MSHCP

148

3.0 HABITAT LOSSES


Table 3-3 Habitat Losses by Area Plan (New Losses to the MSHCP between January 1, 2020 and December 31, 2020)

Area Plan

Total Acres Approved for Development

Acres Approved for Development Outside Criteria

Area

Approved for Development

Inside Criteria Area

% Approved for Development Inside Criteria

Area** Eastvale 32 32 0 0% Elsinore 104 94 10 10% Harvest Valley/Winchester 131 131 0 0% Highgrove 217 154 63 29% Jurupa 331 302 29 9% Lake Mathews/Woodcrest 53 49 4 8% Lakeview/Nuevo 45 33 12 27% Mead Valley 242 235 7 3% Reche Canyon/Badlands 170 163 8 5% REMAP 523 273 251 48% San Jacinto Valley 75 52 23 31% Sun City/Menifee Valley 312 227 84 27% Southwest 156 156 0 0% Temescal Canyon 314 221 94 30% The Pass 681 500 181 27% Riverside/Norco 125 113 12 10% Total* 3,510 2,733 777 22%

* All numbers have been rounded to nearest integer. As a result, sum of columns may deviate from total. ** (%) equals the percentage of the total approved development that occurs within Criteria Areas by Area Plan.

149

3.0 HABITAT LOSSES


Table 3-4 Habitat Losses by Area Plan Cumulative (June 22, 2004 – December 31, 2020)

Area Plan

Total Acres Approved for Development

Acres Approved for Development Outside Criteria

Area

Approved for Development

Inside Criteria Area

% Approved for Development Inside Criteria

Area** Eastvale 3,441 3,392 49 1% Elsinore 6,580 4,679 1,901 29% Harvest Valley/Winchester 2,525 2,511 14 1% Highgrove 785 309 476 61% Jurupa 2,790 2,431 359 13% Lake Mathews/Woodcrest 4,565 4,349 216 5% Lakeview/Nuevo 1,475 1,074 401 27% Mead Valley 5,572 5,146 425 8% Reche Canyon/Badlands 5,115 4,679 435 9% REMAP 9,825 6,049 3,776 38% San Jacinto Valley 6,552 5,450 1,103 17% Sun City/Menifee Valley 20,724 14,757 5,967 29% Southwest 5,861 5,835 26 0% Temescal Canyon 4,693 3,621 1,073 23% The Pass 5,917 4,930 986 17% Riverside/Norco 3,201 3,164 37 1% Total* 89,620 72,376 17,244 19%

* All numbers have been rounded to nearest integer. As a result, sum of columns may deviate from total. ** (%) equals the percentage of the total approved development that occurs within Criteria Areas by Area Plan.

3.3 Agricultural Activities

Existing agricultural uses and conversion of natural lands to agricultural use are Covered Activities within the MSHCP boundaries. Establishment of new agricultural uses specifically within the Criteria Area is a covered activity up to 10,000 acres over the life of the Plan. The MSHCP defines agricultural operations as production of all plants (horticulture), fish farms, animals, and related production activities, including the planting, cultivation and tillage of the soil, dairying, and apiculture, and the production, plowing, seeding, cultivation, growing, harvesting, pasturing, and fallowing for the purpose of crop rotation of any agricultural commodity, including viticulture, apiculture, horticulture, and the breeding, feeding, and raising of livestock, horses, fur-bearing animals, fish, or poultry and all uses conducted as a normal part of such operations, provided such actions are in compliance with all applicable laws and regulations. The RCA established the

150

3.0 HABITAT LOSSES


existing agricultural operations database and reports each year the losses occurring from agricultural activities within the MSHCP as discussed below.

3.1.1. Agricultural Grading Permits 2020

Agricultural grading permits are issued by the Riverside County Building and Safety Department, and these permits represent conversion of undeveloped land to agricultural uses, as well as additional or new agricultural activities on parcels that had already been in agricultural use. In 2020, there were 65 Agricultural grading permits issued by the County Building and Safety Department.

The MSHCP speaks to the Agricultural Commissioner processing Certificates of Inclusion (COI) for agricultural activities, however the County grading ordinance does not require COIs.

All agricultural grading permits were verified to be within the Plan Area. The 65 agricultural grading permits processed in 2020 resulted in a combined loss of 618 acres. The Agricultural Operations Database has been updated for the 2020 Annual Report with a total of 147,153 acres utilized for agricultural purposes as of December 31, 2020 for lands throughout the Plan Area (inside and outside Criteria Area). Further details on the process, procedures, and methods to update the Agricultural Operations Database with the COIs and Agricultural Grading permits for the MSHCP are described in the GIS metadata files. Table 3-5, Agricultural Grading Summary presents agricultural activities throughout the Plan Area as well as within the Criteria Area. The map and GIS files for the database can be found within Appendix A of this annual report.

Table 3-5

Agricultural Grading Summary

Agriculture Grading (Acres)

Count Towards 10,000-Acre MSHCP Agriculture Cap (Acres)

Since Plan Conception thru 2019 146,535 2,423 2020 618 315 Total* 147,153 2,739

* All numbers have been rounded to nearest integer. As a result, sum of columns may deviate from total.

3.1.2. New Agriculture in Criteria Areas Accounting

Since Plan adoption through December 31, 2020, new agriculture totaling 2,739 acres within Criteria Cells has been approved through either COIs or Agricultural Grading (Table 3-5, above)

151

4.0 ROUGH STEP


Annual Report (January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020)4- 4-1

4.0 Rough Step

This chapter is devoted to summarizing all habitat conservation and losses within Criteria Area that have occurred between the time of Plan adoption and December 31, 2020 by means of Rough Step analysis. Rough Step is one of the MSHCP performance measures to monitor success of the MSHCP and specifically conservation of Additional Reserve Lands (ARL). Rough Step is a methodology that helps direct acquisition activity within key vegetation communities of similar weather patterns, geographies, soils, and geologies, as development occurs in Criteria Cells. The MSHCP Plan is divided into nine Rough Step Units (refer to Figure 4-1, Western Riverside County MSHCP Rough Step Analysis Units). Rough Step is intended to ensure that conservation of specific, narrowly distributed habitats occurs in “Rough Step” with development approvals in Criteria Cells. The Rough Step analysis functions as an early warning system to signal where development is outpacing conservation and where future conservation efforts should be focused. Rough Step Units 1 through 8 have acreage goals, while Rough Step 9 does not, hence rough step analysis is not performed on Unit 9 and as such will not be discussed further. Refer to Sections 4.1 through 4.8 for detailed discussion on Rough Step Units 1 through 8. Table 4-1, Key Habitat Losses and Gains by Rough Step Unit in 2020, summarizes how much development (losses) and conservation has taken place inside the Criteria Area (i.e., areas potentially needed for reserve assembly) during the last year. Note that acreages only include losses and gains for those key vegetation communities tracked by Rough Step.

Table 4-1 Habitat Losses and Gains by Rough Step Unit in 2020

(January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020)

Rough Step Unit Total Criteria Area Acres Gains (Conservation) Acres

Losses (Development) Acres

1 9,905 61 41 2 63,251 0 251 3 32,892 443 41 4 108,955 0 262 5 27,874 104 29 6 25,954 32 45 7 28,056 199 98 8 23,157 141 9

Total* 320,044

980

776

* All numbers have been rounded to the nearest integer. As a result, sum of columns may deviate from total.

152

4.0 ROUGH STEP


Annual Report (January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020)4- 4-2

This Annual Report uses the corrected Rough Step formula agreed upon by the Wildlife Agencies (USFWS, CDFW) and the RCA, as well as the changes made to Table 6-3 of the MSHCP (Volume 1). The formula can be found in Minor Amendment 2007-01 (https://www.wrc-rca.org).

153

https://www.wrc-rca.org/Permit_Docs/MSHCP/RCA_2008_AR_Appendix_B_Minor_Amendment_2007-01.pdf

4.0 ROUGH STEP



154

4.0 ROUGH STEP



Table 4-2, Rough Step Acreage Summary, provides available acreage of key vegetation types on private lands in the Criteria Area by Rough Step Unit (column 3) and Additional Reserve Land goals (column 4). Also included are the total acres conserved through December 31, 2020 (column 5) and the total acres authorized for development by Permittees (column 7). The sixth column includes the allowable development acreage targets by vegetation type for each Rough Step Unit, based on the amount of conservation that has occurred (column 5). Habitat Gains for conservation (column 5) are through December 31, 2020. Allowable development was calculated using losses (derived from grading or building permits) between June 22, 2004 and December 31, 2020. Column 8 shows the difference between acres authorized for development (column 7) and the allowable development calculated using the Rough Step formula (column 6). Where the difference is negative (red), the vegetation community would be considered out of Rough Step. Detailed Rough Step information by Unit is presented in Sections 4.1 through 4.9, respectively.

155

4.0 ROUGH STEP



Table 4-2 Rough Step Acreage Summary

Rough Step

Analysis Unit

Key Vegetation Communities

within Analysis Unit

From Table 6-3 in the MSHCP* Total Acres Conserved (between February 2000 and

December 31, 2020)

Allowable Development

Acreage through

December 31, 2020

Total Acres Authorized for Development by Cities and the County (between

June 22, 2004, and December

31, 2020)

Acres Remaining

for Authorized

Development (-red denotes out of Rough

Step)

Private Land Acres within the Criteria Area in the

Analysis Unit

Additional Reserve Land

Acreage Goal for the Key

Vegetation Communities

1

Coastal Sage Scrub 1,210 930 443 148 61 +87

Grasslands 820 180 1 68 57 +11 Riparian Scrub,

Woodland, Forest 680 550 152 45 6 +40

2

Coastal Sage Scrub 14,969 10,359 4,730 2,355 305 +2051

Grasslands 8,656 4,866 3,281 2,679 424 +2255 Riparian Scrub,

Woodland, Forest 590 460 214 67 31 +36

Riversidean Alluvial Fan Sage

Scrub 1,190 1,110 613 48 9 +39

Woodlands and Forests 300 180 111 78 20 +58

3

Coastal Sage Scrub 3,670 2,050 346 408 79 +329

Grasslands 4,690 900 122 842 308 +535 Playas and Vernal

Pools 4,340 3,830 1,350 213 15 +198 Riparian Scrub,

Woodland, Forest 220 110 4 15 8 +7 Riversidean

Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub

190 100 2 11 13 -2

4

Coastal Sage Scrub 21,828 17,948 4,006 1,167 1,046 +122

Desert Scrubs 4,340 3,680 1,885 370 139 +232 Grasslands 10,991 5,961 987 1,252 1,043 +209

Riparian Scrub, Woodland, Forest 1,420 1,322 126 18 9 +10

Riversidean Alluvial Fan Sage

Scrub 1,169 1,099 331 26 23 +3

Woodlands and Forests 1,562 872 184 200 78 +122

5

Coastal Sage Scrub 1,540 370 88 368 183 +185

Grasslands 3,880 1,010 189 770 620 +150 Riparian Scrub, Woodland, Forest 550 460 20 12 13 -0.39

156

4.0 ROUGH STEP



* This Table uses the Rough Step formula, private land acres, and additional reserve lands goals as per Minor Amendment 2007-01.

Rough Step

Analysis Unit


within Analysis Unit

From Table 6-3 in the MSHCP** Total Acres Conserved (between February 2000 and

December 31, 2020)


Acreage through

December 31, 2020

Total Acres Authorized for Development by Cities and the County (between

June 22, 2004, and December

31, 2020

Acres Remaining

for Authorized

Development (-red denotes out of Rough

Step)

Private Land Acres within the Criteria Area in the

Analysis Unit

Additional

Reserve Land Acreage Goal for

the Key Vegetation

Communities

5

Riversidean Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub

370 260 20 19 11 +8

Woodlands and Forests 2,080 1,000 217 319 107 +212

6

Coastal Sage Scrub 4,796 3,876 1,294 368 298 +70

Grasslands 6,188 3,688 1,248 1,012 604 +408 Riparian Scrub, Woodland, Forest 268 208 51 19 13 +6


7


Grasslands 3,620 1,516 240 510 211 +299 Riparian Scrub, Woodland, Forest 570 451 102 36 29 +8 Riversidean Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub

400 339 79 19 23 -4


8


Grasslands 3,690 1,840 281 439 557 -118 Riparian Scrub, Woodland, Forest 280 250 93 13 0 +13


190 130 24 16 9 +7

9

No vegetation communities in Unit 9 were identified for Rough Step analyses.

-- -- -- -- -- --

157

4.0 ROUGH STEP



Rough Step Unit 1

Rough Step Unit 1 encompasses 93,945 acres within the northwestern corner of western Riverside County and includes the Prado Basin, Santa Ana River, and the Jurupa Mountains (see Figure 4-2, Rough Step Unit #1). The Unit is bound by Interstate 91 to the southeast, Cleveland National Forest to the southwest, and Orange and San Bernardino Counties to the west and north, respectively. Only that portion within Criteria Cells is tracked by Rough Step and not all vegetation or land cover within a Rough Step Unit has acreage goals. In Rough Step Unit 1 there are seven vegetation/land cover types, but only three of these have Rough Step acreage goals; coastal sage scrub; grasslands; and riparian scrub, woodland, forest. Table 4-3, Rough Step Unit 1 Acreage Totals provides the losses and gains and resulting allowable development acreage for each of the three vegetation communities with acreage goals.

Table 4-3 Rough Step Unit 1 Acreage Totals

Key Vegetation Communities within

the Rough Step

From Table 6-3 in the MSHCP Total Acres Conserved (between February 2000 and December 31, 2020)


Acreage through

December 31, 2020

Total Acres Authorized for

Development by Cities and the

County (between June 22, 2004, and

December 31, 2020)

Acres Remaining for

Authorized Development (-red denotes out of Rough

Step)

Private Land Acres within the

Criteria Area in the Rough Step

Additional Reserve Land Acreage Goal

for the Key Vegetation

Communities Coastal Sage Scrub 1,210 930 443 148 61 +87

Grasslands 820 180 1 68 57 +11 Riparian Scrub,

Woodland, Forest 680 550 152 45 6 +40

Total* 2,710 1,660 596 261 124 138 * All numbers have been rounded to the nearest integer. As a result, sum of columns may deviate from total.

Through 2020, a total of 596 acres of conservation has occurred for the three tracked vegetation communities within Rough Step Unit 1. Losses to this unit total 124 acres, with remaining development allowance as follows: 87 acres of coastal sage scrub, 11 acres of grasslands, and 40 acres of riparian scrub, woodland, forest. This unit remains in Rough Step for 2020.

Rough Step Unit 1 Snapshot

• All vegetation categories are “in” Rough Step

• Delhi Soils are “in” Rough Step

158

4.0 ROUGH STEP



Delhi Soils Rough Step All suitable habitat for the Delhi Sands Flower-loving Fly within the MSHCP Plan Area is in Rough Step Unit 1. The Delhi Sands Flower-loving Fly is found within the fine, sandy Delhi series soils along the northern edge of Rough Step Unit 1. Unlike other covered species, the Permittees were given options for conservation of this species. These options are described in the Delhi Sands Flower-loving Fly species objectives located in Table 9-2 in the MSHCP (Volume I). As part of the MSHCP Implementing Agreement, the Wildlife Agencies and Riverside County jointly opted to follow Delhi Sands Flower-loving Fly species Objective 1B in the MSHCP (Volume I). Objective 1B mandates that surveys are to be conducted in areas where suitable habitat exists within the mapped Delhi soils (with the exception of Cells 21, 22, and 55). When the species is present, 75 percent of mapped Delhi soils on-site must be conserved. Surveys continue to be required in these areas of the Rough Step Unit.

Alternately, within Cells 21, 22, and 55, surveys are not required. Instead for this three-cell area, 50 acres of Additional Reserve Lands with Delhi soils and suitable habitat for the Delhi Sands Flower-loving Fly shall be acquired. Acquisition of the required 50 acres was procured in 2020 and the Additional Reserve Land Goal has been met for Delhi Soils for Cells 21, 22, and 55. Table 4-4, Delhi Soils Acreage Analysis (Species Account Objective 1B), provides a summary of the Delhi sands Rough Step acreage analysis.

Table 4-4 Delhi Soils Acreage Analysis (Species Account Objective 1B)


the Rough Step

From Objective 1B in the MSHCP (Volume I)

Total Acres Conserved (between February 2000 and

December 31, 2020)


Criteria Area in the

Rough Step



Communities Delhi Soils 270 170 7 Cells 21, 22, 55 50 50 Total* 270 220 57


159

4.0 ROUGH STEP



160

4.0 ROUGH STEP



Rough Step Unit 2

Rough Step Unit 2 encompasses 177,606 acres along the County’s northern border and within the northeastern corner of the County (see Figure 4-3, Rough Step Unit #2). This area includes the Badlands, Reche Canyon, San Timoteo Creek, and the San Jacinto Mountains. This Unit is bound by Interstate 215 to the west, the San Jacinto River to the southwest, the San Jacinto Mountains to the southeast, and the San Bernardino Mountains to the northeast. Only that portion within Criteria Cells is tracked by Rough Step and not all vegetation or land cover within a Rough Step Unit has acreage goals. In Rough Step Unit 2 there are nine vegetation/land cover types, but only five of these have Rough Step acreage goals; coastal sage scrub; grasslands; riparian scrub, woodland, forest; Riversidean alluvial fan sage scrub; and woodlands and forests. Table 4-5, Rough Step Unit 2 Acreage Totals provides the losses and gains and resulting allowable development acreage for each of the five vegetation communities with acreage goals.



the Rough Step

From Table 6-3 in the MSHCP Total Acres Conserved (between February 2000 and

December 31, 2020)*


Acreage through

December 31, 2020



County (between June 22, 2004 and

December 31, 2020)

Acres Remaining for


Step)


Criteria Area in the Rough Step



Communities Coastal Sage Scrub 14,969 10,359 4,730 2,355 305 +2051


Riversidean Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub 1,190 1,110 613 48 9 +39


Total* 25,705 16,975 8,949 5,227 789 +4,439 * All numbers have been rounded to the nearest integer. As a result, sum of columns may deviate from total.

161

4.0 ROUGH STEP



Through 2020, a total of 8,949 acres of conservation has occurred for the five tracked vegetation communities within Rough Step Unit 2. Losses to this unit total 789 acres, with remaining development allowance as follows: 2,051 acres of coastal sage scrub, 2,255 acres of grasslands, 36 acres of riparian scrub, woodland, forest, 39 acres of Riversidean alluvial fan sage scrub, and 58 acres of woodlands and forests. This unit remains in Rough Step for 2020.



162

4.0 ROUGH STEP



163

4.0 ROUGH STEP



Rough Step Unit 3

Rough Step Unit 3 encompasses 150,086 acres within the north-central portion of western Riverside County (see Figure 4-4, Rough Step Unit #3). This Rough Step Unit includes Lake Perris, the San Jacinto Wildlife Area, the San Jacinto River, and the Lakeview Mountains. This Rough Step Unit is bound by Interstate 215 to the west; a branch of the San Jacinto River to the northeast; State Route 60 to the north; and Newport Road, Olive Avenue, and Stetson Avenue to the south. Only that portion within Criteria Cells is tracked by Rough Step and not all vegetation or land cover within a Rough Step Unit has acreage goals. In Rough Step Unit 3 there are 11 vegetation/land cover types, but only five have Rough Step acreage goals; coastal sage scrub; grasslands; playas and vernal pools; riparian scrub, woodland, forest; Riversidean alluvial fan sage scrub; and woodlands and forests. Table 4-6, Rough Step Unit 3 Acreage Totals provides the losses and gains and resulting allowable development acreage for each of the five vegetation communities with acreage goals.



the Rough Step

From Table 6-3 in the MSHCP** Total Acres

Conserved (between February 2000 and

December 31, 2020)


Acreage through

December 31, 2020




December 31, 2020)

Acres Remaining for


Step)

Private Land Acres within the Criteria Area in the Rough Step



Communities Coastal Sage Scrub 3,670 2,050 346 408 79 +329 Grasslands 4,690 900 122 842 308 +535 Playas and Vernal Pools 4,340 3,830 1,350 213 15 +198

Riparian Scrub, Woodland, Forest 220 110 4 15 8 +7

Riversidean Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub 190 100 2 11 13 -2

Total* 13,110 6,990 1,824 1,489 423 1,067


164

4.0 ROUGH STEP



A total of 1,824 acres of conservation has occurred for the five tracked vegetation communities within this Rough Step Unit. Losses to this unit total 423 acres, with remaining development allowance as followed: 329 acres of coastal sage scrub; 535 acres of grasslands; 198 acres of playas and vernal pools; and 7 acres of riparian scrub, woodland, and forest. The Riversidean alluvial fan sage scrub vegetation category is out of Rough Step by a balance of 2 acres. The RCA is actively engaged in acquiring parcels that would bring Riversidean alluvial fan sage scrub back into Rough Step for Unit 3. The total acreage needed is 2.92 acres of Riversidean alluvial fan sage scrub.


• Riversidean Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub is “out” of Rough Step; need to acquire 2.92 acres.

• All other vegetation categories are “in” Rough Step

165

4.0 ROUGH STEP


Annual Report (January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020) 4-15 166

4.0 ROUGH STEP



Rough Step Unit 4

Rough Step Unit 4 encompasses 212,630 acres within the southeastern corner of western Riverside County (see Figure 4-5, Rough Step Unit #4). These areas are composed of upland and wetland habitats in the Vail Lake, Sage, and Wilson Valley areas. This Unit is bound by Diamond Valley Lake, Lake Skinner, and Johnson Ranch to the west; San Diego County and the Agua Tibia Mountains to the south; and the San Jacinto Mountains and eastern Riverside County to the west. Only that portion within Criteria Cells is tracked by Rough Step and not all vegetation or land cover within a Rough Step Unit has acreage goals. In Rough Step Unit 4 there are 10 vegetation/land cover types, but only six have Rough Step acreage goals; coastal sage scrub; desert scrubs; grasslands; riparian scrub, woodland, forest; Riversidean alluvial fan sage scrub; and woodlands and forests. Table 4-7, Rough Step Unit 4 Acreage Totals provides the losses and gains and resulting allowable development acreage for each of the six vegetation communities with acreage goals.



the Rough Step

From Table 6-3 in the MSHCP Total Acres Conserved (between February 2000 and

December 31, 2020)


Acreage through

December 31, 2020




December 31, 2020)

Acres Remaining for


Step)




Communities Coastal Sage Scrub 21,828 17,948 4,006 1,167 1,046 +122

Desert Scrubs 4,340 3,680 1,885 370 139 +232

Grasslands 10,991 5,961 987 1,252 1,043 +209 Riparian Scrub, Woodland, Forest 1,420 1,322 126 18 9 +10

Riversidean Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub 1,169 1,099 331 26 23 +3

Woodlands and Forests 1,562 872 184 200 78 +122

Total* 41,310 30,882 7,519 3,033 2,338 698


167

4.0 ROUGH STEP



Through 2020, a total of 7,519 acres of conservation has occurred for the six tracked vegetation communities within Rough Step Unit 4. Losses to this unit total 2,338 acres, with remaining development allowance as follows: 122 acres of coastal sage scrub; 232 acres of desert scrubs; 209 acres of grasslands; 10 acres of riparian scrub, woodland, forest; 3 acres of Riversidean alluvial fan sage scrub; and 122 acres of woodlands and forests. This unit remains in Rough Step for 2020.


• All vegetation categories are

“in” Rough Step

168

4.0 ROUGH STEP



4.0 ROUGH STEP



Rough Step Unit 5

Rough Step Unit 5 encompasses 91,734 acres within the southwestern corner of western Riverside County and includes the Santa Rosa Plateau, the Tenaja Corridor, and Murrieta Creek (see Figure 4-6, Rough Step Unit #5). This Unit is bound by Interstate 15 to the east, San Diego County to the south, and the Santa Ana Mountains in the Cleveland National Forest to the west and north. Only that portion within Criteria Cells is tracked by Rough Step and not all vegetation or land cover within a Rough Step Unit has acreage goals. In Rough Step Unit 5 there are 10 vegetation/land cover types, but only five have Rough Step acreage goals; coastal sage scrub; grasslands; riparian scrub, woodland, forest; Riversidean alluvial fan sage scrub; and woodlands and forests. Table 4-8, Rough Step Unit 5 Acreage Totals provides the losses and gains and resulting allowable development acreage for each of the five vegetation communities with acreage goals.




the Rough Step



Acreage through

December 31, 2020




December 31, 2020)

Acres Remaining for


Step)




Communities Coastal Sage Scrub 1,540 370 88 368 183 +185

Grasslands 3,880 1,010 189 770 620 +150 Riparian Scrub, Woodland, Forest 550 460 20 12 13 -0.39

Riversidean Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub 370 260 20 19 11 +8

Woodlands and Forests 2,080 1,000 217 319 107 +212

Total* 8,420 3,100 534 1,488 934 555

170

4.0 ROUGH STEP



Through 2020, a total of 534 acres of conservation has occurred for the five tracked vegetation communities within Rough Step Unit 5. Losses to this unit total 934 acres, with remaining development allowance as followed: 185 acres of coastal sage scrub, 150 acres of grasslands, 8 acres of Riversidean alluvial fan sage scrub, and 212 acres of woodlands and forests. The riparian scrub, woodland, forest vegetation category is out of rough step by 0.39 acre. The RCA is actively engaged in acquiring parcels that would bring riparian scrub, woodland, forest back into Rough Step for Unit 5. The total acreage needed is 2.23 acres of riparian scrub, woodland, forest.


• Riparian scrub, woodland, forest “out” of Rough Step; need to acquire 2.23 acres

• All other vegetation categories are “in” Rough Step

171

4.0 ROUGH STEP



4.0 ROUGH STEP



Rough Step Unit 6

Rough Step Unit 6 encompasses 101,542 acres within the south-central region of western Riverside County and includes Antelope Valley, Warm Springs Creek, Paloma Creek, Lake Skinner, Johnson Ranch, and Diamond Valley Lake (see Figure 4-7, Rough Step Unit #6). This Rough Step Unit is bound by Interstate 15 to the northwest, Bundy Canyon Road and Olive Avenue to the north, and Palm Avenue to the west. Only that portion within Criteria Cells is tracked by Rough Step and not all vegetation or land cover within a Rough Step Unit has acreage goals. In Rough Step Unit 6 there are 10 vegetation/land cover types, but only four have Rough Step acreage goals; coastal sage scrub; grasslands; riparian scrub, woodland, forest; and woodlands and forests. Table 4-9, Rough Step Unit 6 Acreage Totals provides the losses and gains and resulting allowable development acreage for each of the five vegetation communities with acreage goals.



within the Rough Step

From Table 6-3 in the MSHCP Total Acres

Conserved (between February 2000 and December 31, 2020)


Acreage through

December 31, 2020




December 31, 2020)

Acres Remaining for


Step)




Communities Coastal Sage Scrub 4,796 3,876 1,294 368 298 +70



Total* 11,392 7,882 2,633 1,412 918 494


173

4.0 ROUGH STEP



Through 2020, a total of 2,633 acres of conservation has occurred for the five tracked vegetation communities within Rough Step Unit 6. Losses to this unit total 918 acres, with remaining development allowance as followed: 70 acres of coastal sage scrub; 408 acres of grasslands; 6 acres of riparian scrub, woodland, forest; and 10 acres of woodlands and forests. This unit remains in Rough Step for 2020.



174

4.0 ROUGH STEP



4.0 ROUGH STEP



Rough Step Unit 7

Rough Step Unit 7 encompasses 130,824 acres within the central-northwestern corner of western Riverside County (see Figure 4-8, Rough Step Unit #7). This Rough Step Unit includes Lake Matthews, Estelle Mountain, Motte Rimrock Preserve, and upland habitats in the Gavilan Hills and Harford Springs Park. This Rough Step Unit also includes portions of the cities of Corona, Riverside, and Perris. This unit is bound by State Route 91 to the north, Interstate 215 to the east, and the Santa Ana Mountains to west. Only that portion within Criteria Cells is tracked by Rough Step and not all vegetation or land cover within a Rough Step Unit has acreage goals. In Rough Step Unit 7 there are 10 vegetation/land cover types, but only five have Rough Step acreage goals; coastal sage scrub; grasslands; riparian scrub, woodland, forest; Riversidean alluvial fan sage scrub; and woodlands and forests. Table 4-10, Rough Step Unit 7 Acreage Totals provides the losses and gains and resulting allowable development acreage for each of the five vegetation communities with acreage goals.




the Rough Step



Acreage through

December 31, 20201




December 31, 2020)

Acres Remaining for


Step)




Communities Coastal Sage Scrub 9,222 6.772 1,591 763 547 +216

Grasslands 3,620 1,516 240 510 211 +299 Riparian Scrub, Woodland, Forest 570 451 102 36 29 +8

Riversidean Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub 400 339 79 19 23 -4

Woodlands and Forest 493 333 27 28 1 +27

Total* 14,305 2,646 2,039 1,356 811 546

176

4.0 ROUGH STEP



Through 2020, a total of 2,039 acres of conservation has occurred for the five tracked vegetation communities within Rough Step Unit 7. Losses to this unit total 811 acres, with remaining development allowance as followed: 216 acres of coastal sage scrub; 299 acres of grasslands; 8 acres of riparian, woodland, forest; and 27 acres of woodlands and forests. The Riversidean alluvial fan sage scrub vegetation category is out of rough step by 4 acres. The RCA is actively engaged in acquiring parcels that would Riversidean alluvial fan sage scrub back into Rough Step for Unit 7. The total acreage needed is 23.74 acres of Riversidean alluvial fan sage scrub.


• Riversidean alluvial fan sage scrub forest is “out” of Rough Step; need to acquire 23.74 acres


177

4.0 ROUGH STEP



4.0 ROUGH STEP



Rough Step Unit 8

Rough Step Unit 8 encompasses 50,408 acres within the west-central region of western Riverside County and includes the cities of Lake Elsinore and Canyon Lake, the Alberhill Area, the San Jacinto River, Horsethief Canyon, and Temescal Wash (see Figure 4-9, Rough Step Unit #8). This Rough Step Unit is bound by the Santa Ana Mountains to the west, Interstate 215 to the east, Bundy Canyon Road to the south, and Rough Step Unit 7 to the north. In Rough Step Unit 8, there are 22,690 acres within the Criteria Area. Only that portion within Criteria Cells is tracked by Rough Step and not all vegetation or land cover within a Rough Step Unit has acreage goals. In Rough Step Unit 8 there are nine vegetation/land cover types, but only four have Rough Step acreage goals; coastal sage scrub; grasslands; riparian scrub, woodland, forest; and Riversidean alluvial fan sage scrub. Table 4-11, Rough Step Unit 8 Acreage Totals provides the losses and gains and resulting allowable development acreage for each of the four vegetation communities

with acreage goals. * All numbers have been rounded to the nearest integer. As a result, sum of columns may deviate from total.



the Rough Step



Acreage through

December 31, 2020




December 31, 2020)

Acres Remaining for


Step)




Communities Coastal Sage Scrub 6,400 4,940 2,996 943 327 +616

Grasslands 3,690 1,840 281 439 557 -118 Riparian Scrub,

Woodland, Forest 280 250 93 13 0 +13

Riversidean Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub 190 130 24 16 9 +7

Total* 10,560 7,160 3,394 1,411 893 518

179

4.0 ROUGH STEP



Through 2020, a total of 3,394 acres of conservation has occurred for the four tracked vegetation communities within Rough Step Unit 8. Losses to this unit total 893 acres, with remaining development allowance as follows: 616 acres of coastal sage scrub; 13 acres of riparian scrub, woodland, forest; and 7 acres of Riversidean alluvial fan sage scrub. At the end of 2020, the vegetation category of grasslands remains “out of Rough Step.” To bring the vegetation category back into Rough Step, a total of 130acres are needed. There are 404 acres of pending grassland conservation in Rough Step Unit 8 as follows: (1) completed JPR projects but which have not yet conveyed (168 ac.), (2) Summerly Back Basin mitigation areas (139 ac.), and (3) Cottonwood Canyon Conservation Area (97 ac.). While the timing of conveyance of development-related conservation is unknown, both the Summerly Back Basin and Cottonwood Canyon conservation can be expected within 1-2 years. The RCA and Permittees continue to focus acquisition efforts when possible on grasslands, as well as working to acquire additional acres in the other vegetation categories, within this Rough Step Unit.


• Grasslands are “out of Rough Step”;need to acquire 150 acres


180

4.0 ROUGH STEP



181

4.0 ROUGH STEP



Rough Step Unit 9

Rough Step Unit 9 is composed of three separate areas within Riverside County. The first area encompasses 80,163 acres within the southwest area of the MSHCP. This portion of the Rough Step Unit consists of mostly Public/Quasi-Public Lands within the Cleveland National Forest forming the coastal mountain range between Southwest Riverside County and Orange County. The second area encompasses 20,975 acres within the northeast area of the MSHCP. This portion of the Rough Step Unit consists of mostly Public/Quasi-Public Lands within the San Bernardino National Forest and the city of Banning north of the Morongo Indian Tribal Lands. The third area encompasses 138,720 acres within the southeast middle portion of the MSHCP. This portion of the Rough Step Unit consists of mostly Public/Quasi-Public Lands within the San Bernardino National Forest but does include the unincorporated areas of Idyllwild and Pine Cove, as well as Garner Valley north of Anza. (See Figure 4-10, Rough Step Unit #9). Rough Step Unit 9 has no key vegetation communities that are tracked through Rough Step. Table 4-12, Rough Step Unit 9 Acreage Totals, provides only acres conserved for non-Rough Step Unit 9 habitats as well as development acreages within this Rough Step Unit.



the Rough Step

From Table 6-3 in the MSHCP

Total Acres Conserved (between February 2000 and December 31, 2020)


Acreage through

December 31, 2020




December 31, 2020)

Acres Remaining for


Step)




Communities No Vegetation Categories have Rough Step Acreage Goals Agriculture 0 n/a 1 Chaparral 104 n/a 31 Coastal Sage Scrub 6 n/a 2 Developed or Disturbed

0 n/a 1

Grasslands 2 n/a 9 Riparian Scrub, Woodland, Forest

0 n/a 0


2 n/a 0

Woodlands and Forest

0 n/a 0

Total* 114 44 * All numbers have been rounded to the nearest integer. As a result, sum of columns may deviate from total.

182

4.0 ROUGH STEP



The 114 acres of conservation that have been acquired within this Rough Step Unit consists of properties that were acquired in other Rough Step Units where the property lines slightly cross into this unit. Losses remain at 44 acres through 2020.


• No vegetation communities within Rough Step Unit 9 were identified for Rough Step analysis

183

4.0 ROUGH STEP



184

5.0 ACTIVITIES WITHIN PLAN AREA


Annual Report (January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020)

5.0 ACTIVITIES WITHIN PLAN AREA 5.1. Single-Family/Mobile Home Activity

Background

In accordance with existing land use regulations, development of a single-family home or mobile home on an existing legal parcel is a Covered Activity, per Section 7.3.2 of the MSHCP (Volume 1). Single-family home grading/site preparation permits and mobile home site preparation permits on existing legal lots within the Criteria Area are reviewed against the MSHCP Conservation Criteria solely to determine the least sensitive portion of the lot for building pad location. These activities are covered by the Expedited Review Process (ERP) provision of the Property Owner Initiated Habitat Evaluation and Acquisitions Negotiation Process. Section 7.3.2 of the MSHCP (Volume 1) lists several assumptions regarding the predicted annual level of single-family/mobile home activity within the Criteria Area. Based on key assumptions, the MSHCP estimated approximately 75 parcels would utilize the ERP provision within the Criteria Area annually. These parcels were estimated to impact approximately 675 acres of land annually. The MSHCP also assumed that, of these 675 acres, half (338 acres) would be within areas considered desirable for inclusion in the MSHCP Conservation Area (i.e., described for conservation). Finally, the MSHCP assumed that the Permittees would successfully negotiate conservation on 75% of the 338 acres, leaving 85 acres for single-family/mobile home development. The annual reporting process is used to determine whether ERP activity is occurring in a manner that is consistent with the assumptions made during MSHCP development.

Effect on Reserve Assembly

Between January 1, 2020 and December 31, 2020, three single-family/mobile home permits utilized the ERP. These permits covered approximately 20 acres within the Criteria Area, with 2 acres described for conservation. This level of ERP development is well below the estimated annual acreage described above. Most of the ERP development occurred within Rough Step Units 3 and 4. Figure 5-1, 2020 ERP Impact on Criteria Area Vegetation shows that impact of ERP development in 2020 has been minimal.

Since inception of the MSHCP, ERP development has involved 3,959 acres of the Criteria Area, with an annual average of 247 acres of ERP development within the Criteria Area. This is far less than the allowable estimate of 675 acres per year (refer to Section 5.1.1, above). As critical vegetation categories become scarce due to development, ERP development (e.g., single-family homes) may play a bigger role in whether a region will maintain its rough step balance.

185



Figure 5-1. 2020 ERP Impact on Criteria Area Vegetation

186



5.2 Public Works Projects

MSHCP Permittees include the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (County Flood), Riverside County Park and Open-Space District (County Parks), Riverside County Waste Management Department, Riverside County Transportation Commission, the 18 cities in western Riverside County, Riverside County, California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), and California Department of Parks and Recreation (State Parks). Public works projects conducted by these agencies receive coverage under the Plan and, when in a Criteria Cell, are subject to Joint Project Review (JPR). JPRs for State Parks and Caltrans are the responsibility of the Wildlife Agencies, while the JPR process for public projects by the other Permittees, as appropriate, is the responsibility of the RCA and the Wildlife Agencies. Table 5-1, Public Works Projects (January 1 through December 31, 2020), summarizes public works project activity during 2020 throughout the Plan Area.

187



Table 5-1 Public Works Projects Throughout the Plan Area

(January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020)

Public Works Permittee Activities Approved between January 1 and December 31, 2020 County of Riverside Transportation Department

• Bridge Replacement Project, Santa Ana River at Hamner Ave • Slurry Seal Project over various locations • Emergency road and storm drain repair – Lake Hills • Integrated Mitigation Project in French Valley • Resurfacing project at Pechanga Rd to county line • Resurfacing project at Chicago Ave, Lloyd St, and Thomas St • Resurfacing project at Cajalco Rd • Sidewalk projects at various locations

Riverside County Transportation Commission

• I-15 Express Lanes, Corona, Norco, Eastvale Jurupa Valley I-15 Express lanes,

Corona, Norco, Eastvale, Jurupa Valley • SR-60 truck lanes • Mid County Parkway • I-15 Railroad Canyon Interchange, Lake Elsinore • SR-91 Pachappa Avenue Underpass, Riverside • I-15/SR-91 Express Lane Connector, Corona • SR-91 Corridor Operations Project, Corona

Riverside County Park and Open-Space District

• Lake Perris Marina Demolition

Riverside Flood Control and Water Conservation District

• Jurupa-Pyrite MDP Line A, Stage 2 • Leach Canyon Dam, Stage 90 Spillway Restoration • Banning MDP Line H, Stage 1 • Norco-Crestview Drive Debris Basin, Stage 1

California State Parks

• Lake Perris Marina Demolition

Caltrans

• Railroad Canyon Interchange • Express Lanes North Direct Connector I-15/SR-91 • Add Westbound Land to SR-91 between Green River Rd and SR-241 • Placentia Ave New Interchange • I-15 Express lanes, Corona, Norco, Eastvale, Jurupa Valley • SR-60 truck lanes

Waste Management

• Lamb Canyon Improvements • Badlands Landfill Improvements • Closed Sites Improvements

188



5.3 Participating Special Entity Permits

Per Section 6.1.6 of the MSHCP (Volume 1), the RCA may grant MSHCP take authorization to non-signatory public agencies and other regional service providers under the Participating Special Entity (PSE) provision, as described in Section 11.8 of the MSHCP Implementing Agreement. The MSHCP defines “Participating Special Entity” as any regional public facility provider, such as a utility company or a public district or other agency that operates and/or owns land within the MSHCP Plan Area but who is not a MSHCP Permittee. The following PSE projects activities occurred in 2020:

• Lockheed Site 2 Laborde Remedial Action - Amendment • Southern California Edison Valley-Ivyglen Subtransmission Line Project, Phase I –

Amendment • Southern California Edison Valley-Ivyglen Subtransmission Line Project, Phase 2 -

Completed

5.4 Criteria Refinement

As indicated in Section 6.6.2F of the MSHCP (Volume 1), Permittees are expected to implement the MSHCP consistent with Cell Criteria. In cases where a Permittee and/or landowner believes that conservation objectives could be achieved in an alternative location or alternative Reserve design scenario, the criteria can be refined to reflect such modification. For the annual reporting year of 2020, the RCA met with several Permittees about Criteria Refinements as a potential option for proposed developments. The Criteria Refinement for the Soboba - Luiseno Village project in the city of San Jacinto has been finalized and pending execution of a Memorandum of Agreement between the RCA and the Soboba Band of Luiseño Indians as well as RCA Board Findings. No other Criteria Refinement project activities occurred.

5.5 Agency Cooperation

Many of the Covered Species and associated sensitive habitats are located on federal and state lands. For these reasons, existing federal and state lands were included in the existing 347,000 acres of Public/Quasi-Public lands. Assumption for conservation of these lands came with the goal that Memoranda of Understanding (MOU) between these state, federal, and other

189



governmental/quasi-governmental agencies must be established to ensure that lands are managed in concert with Covered Species’ needs. U.S. Forest Service. Under agreement with the San Bernardino and Cleveland National Forests, MSHCP Monitoring Program biologists have been conducting species surveys in Forest areas since 2005 and have completed the initial inventory for species presence (refer to Section 8.2 in this report for more details). Survey information is shared and activities coordinated with Forest and other Reserve Managers within the MSHCP, at monthly Reserve Managers meetings hosted by the Biological Monitoring Program. Bureau of Land Management (BLM). Lands owned by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) in western Riverside County contribute to Reserve Assembly as PQP lands. Most of the BLM lands within the MSHCP are associated with the Riverside County Stephens’ Kangaroo Rat Habitat Conservation Plan (SKR-HCP). The BLM released the revision to their draft South Coast Resource Management Plan (SCRMP) in June 2011. The RCA entered into an MOU with the BLM (RCA Agreement No. 09002, BLM MOU No.CA-660-08-01) on June 6, 2008 as a cooperating agency on this Plan. Through this MOU, the RCA worked with the BLM to maximize coordination and achieve consistency where practical in the development of the revisions to the SCRMP. When completed and adopted, the revised SCRMP will be the basis for the BLM and RCA to enter into additional MOU discussions to allow Adaptive Management on BLM properties that would be necessary to meet the objectives of the MSHCP's species specific management plans as they evolve following completion of the initial Monitoring Program species inventory. The SCRMP has not yet been adopted by the BLM. Riverside County Habitat Conservation Agency (RCHCA). The RCHCA is the Joint Powers Authority responsible for implementation of the Stephens’ Kangaroo Rat Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) in western Riverside County. The RCHCA owns approximately 6,700 acres of conservation land at Estelle Mountain and the Southwest MSR surrounding Lake Skinner and Diamond Valley Lake and manages another 10,000 acres at Southwest MSR. As such, the RCHCA is an important conservation landowner in the MSHCP Plan Area and monitoring/management coordination between the RCHCA and RCA benefit MSHCP Covered Species. The RCHCA allows access for MSHCP biological monitoring purposes. Riverside Corona Resource Conservation District (RCRCD). In 2010, the RCA and RCRCD entered into a management MOU for properties which RCRCD either holds in fee title or has a conservation easement over. RCRCD manages these lands in a cooperative manner consistent with the goals and objectives of the MSHCP. The RCA and RCRCD also work collaboratively on In

190



Lieu Fee Program related mitigation opportunities on RCA-owned land and on potential acquisitions within RCRCD’s service area. Inland Empire Resource Conservation District (IERCD). In 2012, the RCA and IERCD entered into a management MOU for properties within the Plan Area which IERCD either holds in fee title or has a conservation easement over. IERCD manages these lands in a cooperative manner consistent with the goals and objectives of the MSHCP. The RCA and IERCD also work collaboratively on In Lieu Fee Program related mitigation opportunities on RCA-owned land. Temecula-Elsinore-Anza-Murrieta Resource Conservation District (TEAM RCD). In 2019, the RCA and TEAM RCD executed a management MOU for properties within the Plan Area which TEAM RCD either holds in fee title or has a conservation easement over. TEAM RCD manages lands in a cooperative manner consistent with the goals and objectives of the MSHCP. Rivers & Land Conservancy (RLC). In 2017, the RCA and RLC executed a management MOU for properties which RLC either holds in fee title or has a conservation easement over. RLC manages these lands in a cooperative manner consistent with the goals and objectives of the MSHCP. The RCA and RLC also work collaboratively on In Lieu Fee Program related mitigation opportunities on RCA-owned land.

5.6 Clerical/Minor Amendments to the MSHCP

Clerical Amendments

Section 6.10.1 of the MSHCP (Volume 1) outlines clerical amendments to the MSHCP and associated revision requirements. The MSHCP states that clerical amendments shall be made by the RCA on its own initiative or in response to a written request submitted by any Permittee or Wildlife Agency, which includes documentation supporting the proposed clerical change. Clerical changes shall not require any amendment to the MSHCP, the Permits, or the Implementing Agreement. Clerical changes include corrections of typographical, grammatical, and similar editing errors that do not change the intended meaning and corrections of any maps or exhibits to correct insignificant errors in mapping. It is assumed that most clerical changes to the MSHCP will occur during the first 10 years of MSHCP implementation. Clerical amendments are to be summarized in each annual report and are found in Appendix A of this report. In 2020, the RCA did not process any clerical amendments.

191



Minor Amendments

Section 6.10.2 of the MSHCP (Volume 1) outlines minor amendments to the MSHCP and associated revision procedures. The following items are considered minor amendments to the MSHCP and shall be administratively implemented: (1) Minor corrections to land ownership;

(2) Minor revisions to survey, monitoring, reporting, and/or management protocols that clearly do not affect Covered Species or overall MSHCP Conservation Area functions and values;

(3) Transfer of target Reserve Assembly acreages between identified subunits within a single Area Plan and/or between Area Plans within a single Rough Step Analysis Unit consistent with the criteria;

(4) Application of Take Authorization for development within Cities incorporated within the MSHCP boundaries after the effective date of the Implementing Agreement, assuming such inclusion does not preclude Reserve Assembly, significantly increase the cost of MSHCP Conservation Area management or assembly, or preclude achieving Covered Species conservation and goals;

(5) Annexation or de-annexation of property within the Plan Area pursuant to Section 11.5 of the Implementing Agreement, provided such inclusion does not preclude Reserve Assembly, significantly increase the cost of the MSHCP Conservation Area management or assembly, or preclude achieving Covered Species conservation and goals;

(6) Minor extension of cut or fill slopes outside of the right-of-way limits analyzed in the MSHCP for covered roadways to accommodate construction in rolling or mountainous terrain; and

(7) Updates/corrections to the vegetation map and/or species occurrence data.

There were no minor amendments to the MSHCP in 2020.

5.7 Fires, Floods, and Drought Section 6.8.3 of the MSHCP (Volume 1) discusses Changed Circumstances potentially affecting the MSHCP Conservation Area that include short-interval return fire, floods, drought, and invasion by exotic species. RCA staff started reporting fire activity within the MSHCP Conservation Area in 2012.

192



Short-Interval Return Fire For the purpose of defining Changed Circumstances, short-interval return fire is defined as fire occurring in the same location as a previous fire within the same footprint more than once in a 5-year period within the MSHCP Conservation Area. When fires return repeatedly to an area, native vegetation can become compromised and non-native plant species can take a strong hold and out compete the native vegetation, ultimately resulting in conversion of native habitat into non-native vegetation that is not useful or less useful to MSHCP covered species.

Table 5-2 Short-Interval Return Fires on MSHCP Conserved Area

Fire Names Years RCA Property Overlapping Acreage Burned

Mustang Fire/Palmer Fire 2015, 2017 Oak Valley Partners 4 Lamb Fire/Manzanita Fire twice in 2017 Potrero 194

Figure 5-2. Short-Interval Return Fire Areas on MSHCP Conservation Area

193



5.8 Activities Affecting Reserve Assembly In consultation with the Wildlife Agencies, this section is meant to provide documentation of actions which have influenced reserve design during the last year. No significant activities occurred in 2020 which influenced reserve design.

194

6.0 FUNDING SUMMARY



6.0 FUNDING SUMMARY The Plan requires that the RCA provide an accounting of relevant financial information for each reporting period. Table 6-1, RCA Program Operation Financial Summary, reflects the specific categories, as detailed in Appendix B-05 of the MSHCP (Volume 1). Following Table 6-1 is Table 6-2, Permittee Revenue (January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020), that summarizes monthly income for each Permittee for the reporting period.

TABLE 6-1 RCA Program Operation Financial Summary

Operational Type Targets/Assumptions

Prior to Plan Approval through

December 31, 2019* January 1 through

December 31, 2020* PROGRAM COSTS

A. Acquisitions Local Conservation Using HANS

(Development) 41,000 acres to be conserved

MSHCP Projection of % Conserved Annually 84% 3%

MSHCP Projection of Acres to be Conserved 34,440 1,230

% of Conservation through Development Process 3.88% 0.06%

Actual Conserved Acres1 1592.27 26.16 Local Acquisitions (RCA)

56,000 acres to be conserved

Projection of % Acquired Annually 86% 3% Projection of Acres to be Acquired 48,160 1,680 Projected Price per Acre $13,100 $13,100 Actual % of Conservation by Local Acquisition 68.97% 1.56%

Actual Price per Acre $9,422 $16,383 Actual Acquisition Cost2 $363,884,166 $14,311,000 Actual Conserved Acres 38,621.44 873.51

Local Commitment Subtotal 97,000 acres to be conserved

Actual Acquisition Cost2 4 $363,884,166 $14,311,000 Total Acres New Conservation 40,213.71 899.68

State Acquisitions

Actual Price per Acre $8,235 $13,873 Actual Acquisition Cost4 $102,188,199 $395,500 Actual Conserved Acres 12,408.983 28.51

Federal Acquisitions

Actual Price per Acre $6,617 $13,873 Actual Acquisition Cost4 $60,866,562 $734,500 Actual Conserved Acres 9,198.50 52.95

195

6.0 FUNDING SUMMARY






December 31, 2020* PROGRAM COSTS

State & Federal Acquisitions Subtotal

56,000 acres to be conserved

Actual Acquisition Costs $163,054,761 $1,130,000

Actual Conserved Acres 21,607.48 81.46 Acquisitions Total

153,000 acres to be Conserved

Total Acquisition Costs $526,938,927 $15,441,000

Total Acres New Conservation 61,821.19 981.13

B. Program Management Land Management Based on Actual $13,449,557 $1,392,836

Species Monitoring Based on Actual $18,535,581 $1,881,510

Administration Based on Actual $53,194,128 $4,968,892 Management Existing Lands $17 (30% of management cost) N.A. N.A.

Program Management Total $85,179,266 $8,243,238

TOTAL REPORTING PERIOD COSTS5 $612,118,193 $23,684,238

PROGRAM REVENUE A. Development Fees

Per unit Residential Fee $2,234 Combined Residential, Commercial and Industrial Fees $217,405,362 $16,801,860

Per acre Com & Ind Fee $7,606 Density Bonus Fees Program in Development $0 $0

Units using density bonus Program in Development $0 $0 Per Unit Fee Program in Development NA NA

Development Fees Subtotal $217,405,362 $16,801,860 B. Landfill Revenue

Landfill Revenue - Previous Years $6,000,000 NA El Sobrante Revenue $36,689,620 $3,409,696 Other Landfill Fees $4,306,464 $400,000

Landfill Revenue Subtotal $46,996,084 $3,809,696 C. Infrastructure Mitigation

Measure “A” Revenue $152,009,708 $0 TUMF $7,100,232 $1,941,859 Flood Control $5,279,255 $170,050 Other Gov MSHCP Infrastructure $2,216,514 $1,043

196

6.0 FUNDING SUMMARY






December 31, 2020* PROGRAM REVENUE

Other Gov MSHCP Civic projects $2,681,239 $129,957 Misc. Participating Fees $16,641,117 $6,014,094

Infrastructure Revenue Subtotal $185,928,065 $8,257,003 TOTAL REVENUE IN REPORTING PERIOD $450,329,511 $28,868,559

1 There are approximately 9,857 acres identified to be conserved at some future date from the JPR (Joint Project Review) and HANS Review of developments from the inception of the Plan. 2 Acquisition Costs include RCTC Measure "A" funds. 3 Total Acres New Conservation includes the Potrero - MARB SKR Trade out lands and all acquisitions both inside and outside of the MSHCP Criteria Cells by RCA and Permittees since February 2000. 4 Only includes land acquisition costs. Other costs related to the acquisition including appraisals are not included. 5 Includes costs incurred before Plan inception and state and federal cost of acquisition which are not RCA direct costs. * Numbers have been rounded before calculations are performed. As a result, sum of columns may deviate from total.

197

6.0 FUNDING SUMMARY



TABLE 6-2

Permittee Revenue (January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020) Permittee January-20 February-20 March-20 April-20 May-20 June-20 July-20

City Of Banning $19,512 $1,006,033 $7,382 - - - $2,234 City Of Beaumont $7,825 $36,856 $99,529 $6,504 $8,672 $110,568 $24,574 City Of Calimesa $69,376 $26,016 $67,208 $62,872 - $147,424 $84,892 City Of Canyon Lake $2,168 - - - - - $2,234 City Of Corona $32,440 $47,960 $10,840 $34,344 $26,016 $20,820 $29,042 City Of Eastvale $61,072 $24,984 $8,328 $61,072 $27,760 $55,444 $30,030 City Of Hemet $51,560 $19,357 $10,840 $64 $2,168 - $1,369 City Of Jurupa Valley $37,497 - $117,075 $65,040 $110,568 $78,048 $29,042 City Of Lake Elsinore $2,168 $82,709 $37,472 $30,536 $3,556 $2,168 City Of Menifee $70,856 $201,944 $160,432 $128,864 $153,928 $184,200 $140,970 City Of Moreno Valley $39,024 $88,068 - $47,688 $21,629 $80,068 $90,440 City Of Murrieta - - $2,141 $93,541 - - - City Of Norco $48,057 - $2,168 - $2,168 - - City Of Perris $11,160 - $10,840 $10,840 $19,512 $188,218 $8,936 City Of Riverside $15,249 $21,057 $4,669 $85,065 $2,168 $118,215 $18,369 City Of San Jacinto - $34,688 $35,216 $26,016 $30,243 $32,520 $32,971 City Of Temecula $13,361 $48,580 $54,912 - - $2,168 $2,234 City Of Wildomar $21,680 $10,840 - $2,168 - $21,680 $26,808 County Of Riverside $589,102 $484,794 $267,321 $340,169 $226,344 $1,020,204 $315,407 Totals $1,092,107 $2,133,886 $896,373 $994,783 $634,732 $2,061,745 $839,552

198

6.0 FUNDING SUMMARY



TABLE 6-2 (Continued)

Permittee Revenue (January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020) Permittee Aug-20 Sep-20 Oct-20 Nov-20 Dec-20 Totals 2020 % of TOTAL

City Of Banning $2,234 - - $4,468 - $1,041,863 6.20% City Of Beaumont $46,914 - $26,808 $73,961 $183,188 $625,399 3.72% City Of Calimesa $69,254 $71,488 $55,850 $67,020 $55,850 $777,250 4.63% City Of Canyon Lake $4,468 - - $2,234 $2,234 $13,338 0.08% City Of Corona $11,440 $29,220 $28,686 $13,841 $22,340 $306,989 1.83% City Of Eastvale $45,760 $15,601 - $8,580 - $338,631 2.02% City Of Hemet - $31,210 $81,602 $57,952 $256,121 1.52% City Of Jurupa Valley $308,292 $483,257 $40,212 $17,872 $26,808 $1,313,711 7.82% City Of Lake Elsinore $25,549 $50,920 $27,170 $27,282 $36,433 $325,963 1.94% City Of Menifee $218,846 $262,493 $212,144 $203,294 $189,890 $2,127,861 12.66% City Of Moreno Valley $33,510 $4,468 $106,712 $142,121 $122,870 $776,598 4.62% City Of Murrieta - $13,415 $55,955 - - $165,052 0.98% City Of Norco - - - - - $52,393 0.31% City Of Perris $48,203 $60,318 $251,798 $136,274 $491,407 $1,237,506 7.37% City Of Riverside $57,919 $58,219 $11,962 $2,298 $14,786 $409,977 2.44% City Of San Jacinto $44,680 $53,616 $17,872 $53,816 $37,978 $399,616 2.38% City Of Temecula $26,544 $8,580 $388,358 $23,684 $6,056 $574,477 3.42% City Of Wildomar - $33,510 $8,936 $2,234 $17,872 $145,728 0.87% County Of Riverside $373,078 $517,932 $577,678 $528,924 $672,434 $5,913,387 35.19% Totals $1,316,691 $1,663,037 $1,841,351 $1,389,505 $1,938,098 $16,801,860 100.00%

199

7.0 MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES



Management Goals Section 5.2 of the MSHCP (Volume 1) indicates that management’s goal is to, “establish and maintain a self-sustaining MSHCP Conservation Area that focuses on conserving habitats and species and is consistent with the conservation objectives for the Covered Species.”

Management activities for the MSHCP occur at two levels: habitat/landscape and species-specific. The MSHCP Land Management team focuses on the balance between managing the overall landscape of the future Reserve and managing lands to support specific species requirements (refer to Table 5-2 of the MSHCP [Volume 1]). The key to long term management of the MSHCP Reserve is to incorporate an Adaptive Management approach so that management of habitats and species is flexible and dynamic. As the MSHCP Reserve builds and with feedback from Monitoring Program species occurrence data, MSHCP Reserve Managers develop and incorporate land management techniques to meet the needs of the lands now and into the future.

In 2020, MSHCP Reserve Management has worked with the Monitoring Program to better understand survey data and how to compare and/or correlate data with species-based management activities.

General Management Activities Section 5.2.1 of the MSHCP (Volume 1) stipulates that the Reserve Managers and the Reserve Management Oversight Committee (RMOC) identify the priorities for management activities to carry out the species objectives and biological values. In 2009, the RMOC Steering Committee was formed to focus and direct the functions of the RMOC. The RMOC Steering Committee consists of the RCA, USFWS, CDFW, State Parks, and County Parks.

The RCA Reserve Manager established priorities in collaboration with RCA management staff. The following outlines activities that MSHCP Reserve Management staff focused on in 2020 per Section 5.2.1 of the MSHCP (Volume 1):

• Control unauthorized public access (patrol, fencing, gates, signage), trash removal, etc.

200



• Maintain acquired lands in conditions similar to or better than when acquired. • Remove non-native invasive species and restore natural habitat using seeding, pole cuttings,

transplanting, and/or passive restoration. • Conduct fire abatement activities in compliance with County Ordinance 695 or other

jurisdictions as applicable to the location of the land.

Reserve Management Units The MSHCP contemplated five conceptual management units (refer to Figure 5-1 of the MSHCP [Volume 1]). After Plan adoption, the Reserve Managers created a more detailed breakdown of the management units depicted in the MSHCP. To manage the entire 500,000-acre Reserve in an effective and efficient manner, it was necessary to break up the MSHCP’s five management units into more manageable sizes. The current nine Reserve Habitat Management Units (HMU) are shown in Figure 7-1. Location and Distribution of the Nine Reserve Habitat Management Units. Although the U.S. Forest Service (Forest Service) Units are part of the 500,000-acre Reserve, they are not assigned a MSHCP Habitat Management Unit because the management of Forest Service lands is dictated by their Land Management Plans.

The MSHCP Management Team has completed management plans for Cactus Valley, Gavilan, and Sage and the draft management plan for the Menifee HMU which will act as the “blueprint” for how the Menifee HMU will be managed. The management plans identify specific habitat or vegetation management methodologies (e.g., burning, mowing, grazing, herbicides, hand clearing or thinning), as well as focus on species-specific management needs.

201



Figure 7-1. Location and Distribution of the Nine Reserve Habitat Management Units.

202



Figure 7-2 below shows the number of acres acquired and/or managed by the RCA in each Habitat Management Unit at the end of 2020, 42,360 acres in total. As the reserve land in each management unit is assembled, implementation of the management activities within the Plan Area will become more cohesive and streamlined to implement.

Figure 7-2. Acres by Habitat Management Unit through 2020.

Reserve Management Staffing In addition to RCA management staff, the RCA contracts with Riverside County Regional Park and Open-Space District (Parks District) for reserve land management. The Parks District Reserve Management Unit in 2020 had 10 full time personnel assigned to the RCA program. These included a Natural Resources Manager who oversees all MSHCP management services; two Natural Resource Specialists who perform a variety of resource-related tasks including the evaluation/assessment of newly acquired MSHCP lands; one Park Ranger Supervisor who oversees day-to-day field operations of Rangers and Park Maintenance Workers; three Park Rangers (level II), and three Park Maintenance Workers.

14,632

7,799

4,889 4,469

3,346 3,316

1,783 1,697

429

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

14,000

16,000

ACRE

AGE

HABITAT MANAGEMENT UNITS

Acres by Habitat Management Unit

Sage

Cactus Valley

Menifee

San Timoteo

San Jacinto

Gavilan

Badlands

Santa Ana Mtns

River

203



RCA Managed Properties Through 2020, the Reserve Management Team oversees approximately 869 individual parcels (409 properties) totaling approximately 42,361 acres. Twenty properties were added to the RCA managed reserve inventory in 2020, equaling 694 acres (Table 7-1). Figure 7-2 illustrates two properties acquired by the RCA during 2020. The Park District only manages lands that the RCA holds either in fee title or in a conservation easement and in all cases, lands that are classified as Additional Reserve Lands (ARL). Other ARL are generally managed by their owning entities (e.g. Riverside-Corona Resources Conservation District). The RCA continues to work with those owning entities to ensure reserve properties are managed in accordance with the MSHCP through a Memorandum of Understanding. Table 7-1. RCA Managed Properties Added to the Reserve Inventory in 2020.

Closed Date Map/Detail Number Property Name Acreage

1/2/2020 08-52 VAN DER LINDEN DONATION 7.97

1/21/2020 06-76 SPENCER'S CROSSING DONATION 12.08

2/24/2020 08-53 RHW PHASE 1 81.82

3/3/2020 03-40 ADAMS WALLKAMM 13.80

3/16/2020 07-32 CHUN, STEPHEN AND ANNE 34.84

3/18/2020 03-41 HARDMAN, ANNE 39.26

3/27/2020 06-77 FLEMING FRENCH VALLEY - PHASE 2 17.16

4/3/2020 05-56 RAHMATI #1 19.89

4/3/2020 05-57 RAHMATI #2 23.36

4/6/2020 03-42 RCTC DILWORTH DONATION #3 24.58

4/20/2020 05-58 TNC ANDERSON 18.89

5/18/2020 07-33 DAWSON CREEK 145.44

7/14/2020 06-78 HIGHPOINTE DONATION 3.21

7/22/2020 08-54 MARRELLI, MARINA 28.03

8/12/2020 08-55 TUSCANY HILLS PHASE 4 28.45

9/14/2020 03-43 IDA LANE 142.69

10/2/2020 05-59 WELSH, KENNETH 19.32

11/24/2020 05-60 FRESH START HOME 8.15

11/24/2020 07-34 KINNE, AMIE AND JONATHAN 13.78

11/25/2020 01-13 YBARRA, GABRIEL AND GLORIA 11.21 Total 693.93

204



Figure 7-3. The IDA Lane property (left) in the Lakeview Mountains and the Welsh property (right) in the Tenaja Corridor were among the properties acquired in 2020.

Property Assessments Properties that meet MSHCP conservation needs continue to be acquired by the RCA. Following appraisals and negotiations, the RCA requests a walk-over inspection of the site by the Reserve Management Unit to ensure there are no significant issues that would prevent the RCA from taking fee title and/or managing the property consistent with the MSHCP. Such issues include significant trash, encroachments from neighboring parcels, hazardous materials or other health and safety issues, and threats to wildlife. Examples are illustrated in Figure 7-4. The Reserve Management Unit also inspects the property to ensure that the property corners have been clearly staked and marked. When such issues are located, the information is relayed to the RCA so that the issues can be resolved prior to acquisition, or so that funding can be negotiated with the seller to resolve the issues post-acquisition. If no issues are identified during the inspections, the RCA is informed, and the acquisition can be completed. Once the acquisition is finalized, the Reserve Management Unit assumes management of the property. In 2020, the Reserve Management Unit inspected 27 potential new properties totaling 1,322.33 acres.

205



Figure 7-4. Typical issues discovered and remediated during the pre-acquisition phase; dumped trash piles at the RCA Konno Property (left) and a 0.5-acre encroachment into the RCA Eustachio property (right).

Habitat Protection and Site Security

A clearly stated goal of land management by the MSHCP is the protection of reserve lands from human activities that degrade or destroy habitat. Measures put in place to ensure the protection of the species and limit habitat degradation include fencing, gates, fuels reduction/weed abatement, and increased ranger patrol during sensitive life cycle periods of certain species (e.g., Burrowing Owl [Athene cunicularia] breeding season or wildflower bloom season). During 2020, most Reserve Management Uni t efforts were spent on these endeavors. As reserve assembly nears completion proportionately more Reserve Management Unit staff time will be spent on adaptive and biological management of the Reserve properties. Currently, most staff time still needs to be spent securing and protecting the properties from damage. The types of uses permitted on MSHCP properties continue to be addressed on a case-by-case basis in discussions between the RCA and the Reserve Management Unit staff. In general, pursuant to the requirements of the MSHCP, passive public recreation is allowed on existing trails, such as hiking, running, birdwatching, and mountain biking. Equestrian use is also allowed on RCA lands that supported such activity at the time of acquisition. Motorized access or recreation (e.g., off-highway vehicles [OHV]), hunting, shooting, archery (unless authorized by the RCA), trail creation, camping, and fires are not permitted. A considerable portion of maintenance efforts continue to be devoted to the establishment and maintenance of access controls in areas with significant unauthorized use. Such areas during 2020 included the Wilson Creek, San Timoteo, Gavilan Hills, and Menifee areas. In total, Reserve

206



Management Unit staff fabricated and installed approximately 1.20 miles of new fencing across 10 different properties and fabricated and installed two gates and one replacement equestrian step-over. Enforcement during 2020 focused on patrol for the interdiction of routine types of unauthorized uses such as OHVs, illegal dumping, homeless encampments, and target shooters. A substantial amount of time was also devoted to closures of illegally created trails, often by mountain bikers, and the interdiction of illegal marijuana grows on RCA Reserve land. The COVID-19 pandemic had a large effect, both positive and negative on the reserve system with an exceedingly large uptick in both authorized and unauthorized use. Early during the pandemic, flocks of visitors arrived at the Reserve lands to hike and spend time outside In alignment with stay-at-home orders, all RCA Reserve lands closed for a three-week period in April 2020. As limitations on outdoor activities subsided, visitors returned to the reserves in record numbers, often using OHVs. The effectiveness of interdiction and cooperation from OHV users continues to be difficult (Figure 7-5). In addition to establishing and maintaining OHV access controls and conducting regular patrols, Reserve Management Unit staff continued to work with external entities for assistance and coordination. With regards to OHV activity, ranger staff sought help from and provided support to Park District Rangers (Open-Space Unit), the Riverside County Sheriff’s Department, local law enforcement agencies, and BLM as all these entities grappled with the sometimes overwhelming increase in illicit activity. In 2020, Ranger staff contacted 21 OHV riders or groups of riders on RCA Reserve lands and 251 OHV riders or groups of riders adjacent to RCA Reserve lands. In general, time was spent informing the riders of property boundaries, the MSHCP, the prohibition of OHVs in Western Riverside County (County Ord. 529) and escorting the riders out of the area. Contact was unsuccessful with 31 riders who fled the area when approached.

207



Figure 7-5. OHV contacts at the KB SJ River Donation (left) and Terra Investors property (right). Illegal dumping continues to be a major concern and absorbs many management resources, including time and equipment. Dumping includes refuse associated with homeless encampments, roadside litter, stolen vehicles, landscaping, household trash, and marijuana grow sites. In 2020, a total of 14.9 tons of trash was removed from RCA Reserve lands by staff and taken directly to county waste facilities. However, the amount of refuse removed from RCA Reserve lands did decrease from 2019 by 2.7 tons (4,540 pounds). In addition to refuse brought directly to county landfills, roughly 23.2 cubic yards of additional refuse were removed and placed in Parks District dumpsters at the Natural Resources Management Offices at Hidden Valley Wildlife Area and the RCA Reserve Goodhart residence. Four stolen vehicles and 190 gallons of paint and oil were also removed from RCA conserved lands in 2020 after being discovered by Reserve Management Unit staff. Conversely, on three separate occasions, contact information found within piles of dumped household refuse, was used to contact the offending party. On each of these occasions, the offending party was persuaded to return to the dump site and remove the dumped belongings from RCA Reserve lands.

Homeless encampments continue to be an issue on RCA Reserve lands. These encampments were usually located in sensitive riparian habitat due to the natural cover that is provided. Negative impacts associated with these camps include massive amounts of trash, cleared vegetation, contaminated water, and increased risk of wildfire from cooking and campfires. In 2020, 24 active and abandoned homeless camps (totaling 42 individuals) were located, cleared of their occupants, and/or cleared of refuse by Reserve Management Unit staff. This number was an increase from 17 encampments cleared in 2019.

208



Figure 7-6. Nearly 100 gallons of discarded used motor oil from the RCA Kisling Enterprises property (left) and a large homeless encampment at the RCA Oak Valley Partners property (right) were addressed in 2020.

Of increased concern to RCA Reserve lands in recent years is the increase of recreation on the landscape, particularly of mountain bike use. The southwestern portion of the MSHCP Plan Area has seen rapid growth in this recreational activity, with dozens of miles of unauthorized trails constructed on private property, PQP lands, and RCA Reserve lands. Areas such as Murrieta Hills, Oak Mountain, Warm Springs Creek, and the Temecula Escarpment have been the hardest hit areas. Utilizing two e-bikes, trail patrols occurred on an approximately weekly basis in 2020. Time was spent during these patrols identifying and closing illegally created trails, reinforcing and expanding vandalized or ignored closed trails access controls, making contacts with users, generally becoming familiar with trail systems, and showing a presence on the landscape. Despite these efforts, vandalism to the access controls (e.g., signs, temporary fencing, brush piles, etc.) for closed trails remained problematic throughout the year. To address this issue, it will require creative solutions as well as ample amounts of time and resources.

209



Figure 7-7. Bike patrols of back country trails at the RCA Bautista Canyon Property (Right) and individuals

caught building an unauthorized bike bridge at the RCA Cornerstone Property (left). The bridge builders were persuaded to remove the bridge prior to its completion.

The Reserve Management Unit has witnessed an uptick of illegal marijuana grows occurring on public lands. The Reserve Management Unit addressed several illicit grows on RCA Reserve lands in 2020. Fortunately, the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) further developed their Marijuana Enforcement Program, which became a valuable resource beginning in 2020. At the RCA Fethke property staff discovered a large grow operation centered on the property and extending onto surrounding private parcels. Staff was able to find the water source for the grow; a fire hydrant on the Santa Rosa Plateau Ecological Reserve, which had been permanently tapped into below ground level. The grow was reported to the CDFW enforcement program. After an investigation, an interagency team led by CDFW converged on the grow and removed an estimated 4,000 mature marijuana plants from native habitat. Meanwhile, at the RCA Agua Tibia Donation property, staff discovered a new irrigation line leading into the property from a creek in an adjacent U.S. Forest Service parcel. The area was inspected by the Riverside County Sheriff South West Station Marijuana Enforcement Team. While the irrigation line was found to simply pass through the RCA Reserve land, an undiscovered grow was found on the adjacent National Forest and many old grow operations were discovered in areas supporting old-growth chaparral. Staff took the opportunity to remove the active irrigation line from the RCA Reserve property and clear debris from the largest grow site. State and federal officials cleared the grow sites adjacent to and encroaching on RCA lands. Finally, Ranger staff worked with two private property neighbors to remove portions of their grow operations that had spilled over onto RCA Reserve land. The private property residents were persuaded to remove approximately 250 marijuana plants and associated infrastructure from the RCA Higgins Reserve property, and a green house, fence, and water tank from the RCA Hariton Reserve property.

210



Figure 7-8. A marijuana grow encroachment at the RCA Higgins property (left) and debris from an old grow

site at the RCA Aqua Tibia property (right) were cleared by Reserve Management Unit staff.

Management Activity Data Sheets (MADS) In 2020, Reserve Management Unit staff continued to document remedial actions taken on RCA Reserve lands impacted by vandalism or unauthorized activity. Mapped results depict known hotspots and allow Ranger and Maintenance staff to respond accordingly. Reserve Management Unit staff submitted 244 MADS in 2020. The following incidents were documented and corrected: 20 major dumping issues (compared to 21 in 2019), three target shooting contacts (compared to four in 2019), 134 incidents of damage to fencing (compared to 40 in 2019), 14 incidents of gate or lock damage (compared to 17 in 2019), and 14 OHV contacts (compared to 24 in 2019). In total, 3,553 feet of fencing was repaired or replaced due to theft or damage, compared to 1,755 feet in 2019. Of the 244 MADS recorded, 154 were associated with OHV activity. OHV activity is costly to RCA Reserve lands because the activity damages habitats, fencing, gates, and provides a level of human presence that dissuades wildlife use. Gates and fencing are destroyed for ingress and egress and creation of new trails and/or jumps occurs. Direct contact and escort removal of OHV users occurs regularly however, RCA Rangers are not always able to make direct contact, either because the OHV user flees the area, or because the use occurs when RCA Rangers are not present.

Management Coordination

In the early part of 2020, the monthly Santa Ana Watershed Association (SAWA) sponsored Reserve Managers meetings continued to provide a venue for coordination between non-RCA and

211



RCA land management entities within the boundaries of the MSHCP Plan area. The meetings also provide a platform for relevant research topics to be presented. Since inception of the Reserve Managers group, the meetings have grown to include members from most local management agencies, including the USFWS, U.S. Forest Service, BLM, CDFW, California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, California Department of Parks and Recreation, the Center for Natural Lands Management, and other non-profit entities. Together, this group discusses a myriad of management and monitoring issues and how to best solve them. Unfortunately, the meetings were halted for the latter part of the year due to COVID-19 before resuming virtually.

Reserve Management Unit staff also attended monthly meetings with the RCA and the Biological Monitoring Program management to discuss monthly activities, seek input on management issues, and generally coordinate field evaluations for RCA acquisitions. Additionally, Reserve Management Unit staff meets internally on a monthly basis to discuss current projects, new acquisitions, and to coordinate management activities. Collaborative partnerships between the Reserve Management Unit and external organizations continued to be developed or fostered for the benefit of various mutually important natural resources. In 2020, these partnerships included (1) a restoration experiment started by The Redlands Conservancy and the University of Redlands at the RCA Live Oak Canyon Reserve property, (2) United States Geological Survey Southwestern Pond Turtle surveys in the Santa Ana River Watershed, (3) shared patrols between the Inland Empire Resource Conservation District (IERRD) and the RCA Reserve Management Unit at the shared boundary of the newly acquired IERCD Holmes property and the RCA Oak Valley Partners Reserve property, (4) shared patrols for homeless encampments between the Center for Natural Lands Management (CNLM) and RCA Reserve Management Rangers at the shared boundary of the CNLM Warm Springs Reserve and the RCA Winchester 700 Murrieta Reserve property, and (5) a San Bernardino Kangaroo Translocation study by the San Diego Zoo Wildlife Conservation Alliance at the RCA San Jacinto River Ranchos Meadows At Lone Cone Reserve property (see Section 7.5 below for more details)

Reserve Management Unit staff attended several symposia and conferences to stay abreast of developments in plant and animal biology and land management. Professional conferences allow for dissemination of and collaboration on the newest science and developments within their respective areas. In 2020, staff attended the Western Section of the Wildlife Society Conference, California Invasive Plant Council Symposium, and the Low Desert Weed Management Area annual meeting.

Habitat Enhancement In 2020, the Reserve Management Unit continued efforts to enhance disturbed habitat at RCA Reserve properties. Activities conducted during 2020 included new active restoration projects, as

212



well as management of existing restoration projects that will directly benefit the MSHCP’s Covered Species. Some of the highlighted projects are described below. Alkali Playa Invasive Stinknet Plant Eradication Stinknet (Oncosiphon pilulifer) is a highly invasive weed with little habitat value. It infests more and more lands each year, following its initial infestations in the Lake Perris area. Due to its propensity to form extensive monoculture stands and thrive in alkali soils, RCA paid special attention to the weed in the sensitive habitats of the Hemet Playa area and the middle San Jacinto River in 2020 where the plant was beginning to take a strong hold. These areas are home to several rare, threatened, and endangered plants, some of which are found no other place on earth. Staff spent time searching all RCA properties in these areas, documenting the plants presence, and eradicating it. Rodeo© herbicide was utilized to treat large stands of the plant at the RCA Sey property (2-acre patch) and the RCA Carlsbad property (two patches totaling 6.2 acres). While the herbicide was effective at killing the weed prior to seeding, special care was needed to avoid sensitive plants growing amongst it and areas required retreatment for complete die off. In addition, a .02-acre patch of flowering Stinknet was hand pulled from the RCA Kaelin #1 property, a 10 foot by 10 foot flowering patch was hand pulled from the RCA Kaelin #2 property, and scattered flowering individuals were pulled from the RCA Dilworth #2 property.

Figure 7-9. Stinknet herbicide treatment in progress at the RCA Carlsbad property (left) and large patches of dead and dying Stinknet (dark brown and yellow) post first-round treatment at the RCA Sey property (right).

213



San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat Translocation The RCA Reserve Management Unit assisted the San Diego Zoo Wildlife Conservation Alliance (San Diego Zoo) in their experimental San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat (Dipodomys merriami parvus; SBKR) translocation study. Translocation is when a species is moved from one location to another. The experiment was designed to test the efficacy of translocating SBKR as a mitigation measure to offset developmental impacts to the species. The RCA San Jacinto River Ranchos Meadows at Lone Cone property was chosen as a receptor site (receiver) for the experiment. The site was chosen because it had potentially suitable habitat for the species, was unoccupied by SBKR, but was contiguous with SBKR occupied areas nearby. Following habitat guidelines for the species set forth by researchers of the San Diego Zoo, the 3.4-acre translocation site was prepped by Reserve Management Unit staff. Annual vegetation was string trimmed across the site to create additional bare ground, which the species prefers. Next, three large dead trees around the site were felled by staff to reduce potential raptor perch sites. Finally, shrubs across the site were thinned. Three Ford F550 dump truck loads of shrubs were cut, hiked out of the site, and trucked away. The stumps of the cut shrubs were treated with Rodeo herbicide to prevent regrowth. Once the site was ready, San Diego Zoo staff released 49 SBKR onto the site, with approximately half of them equipped with radio trackers. The animals were sourced from future development/disturbance footprints in the San Jacinto River and Santa Ana River washes. The Zoo monitored the site for the remainder of the year to ascertain the status of the released animals. Many were found to be remaining alive and well on site throughout the latter part of the year. Post release of the animals, Ranger staff increased their presence in the area and addressed any issues as they arose (including maintaining OHV access controls and homeless encampment patrols) to prevent human disturbances to the site.

Figure 7-10. Staff preparing the RCA San Jacinto River Ranchos Meadows at Lone Cone property for the San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat (SBKR) translocation study (left) and an SBKR ready for release at the site (right).

214



Delhi Sands Flower-loving Fly Habitat Management

Habitat management continued in the only known property occupied by Delhi Sands Flower-loving Fly in the MSHCP Plan area, the Teledyne property. Refer to Section 7.11.15, for details.

Lands Received through Federal Clean Water Act Section 404 Permits and Federal Endangered Species Act Section 7 Consultations

The RCA has acquired properties, either in fee title or as the grantee of a conservation easement, that are subject to special reporting under the provisions related to federal Clean Water Act (CWA), Section 404 permitting, and federal Endangered Species Act (ESA) Section 7 consultation. The monitoring, maintenance, and management activities for these properties can include: 1. Annual biological monitoring effort and MSHCP Covered Species observations. 2. Annual removal of trash or man-made debris. 3. Annual maintenance of signage and other notification features. 4. Installation/maintenance of fences and gates. 5. Annual restoration of the property damaged by prohibited activities. The below subsections summarize the biological monitoring and management activities performed on each property the RCA acquired through CWA and ESA consultation.

215



7.11.1 BFW CORONA1

Species Monitoring The MSHCP Biological Monitoring Program did not perform focused surveys on the property in 2020. Management The BFW Corona property was patrolled periodically during 2020 with no issues to report. This property needs future enhancement performed through removal of the dense gum trees (Eucalyptus spp.) in the riparian.

7.11.2 DR Horton2

Species Monitoring The MSHCP Biological Monitoring Program did not perform focused surveys on the property in 2020. However, Blainville's horned lizard (Phrynosoma blainvillii) was documented at the property by the MSHCP Biological Monitoring Program staff. Management Other than occasional perimeter patrols and one thorough interior inspection, no management was done on the DR Horton property in 2020. Due to the double wrought iron fences along its border with the adjacent housing development, the property has very little access by the public. The coastal sage scrub and riparian restoration areas on the property continue to show signs of success, as measured by high survivorship of the planted shrubs and trees, and relatively little nonnative plant cover. Approximately 1,000 feet of PCV pipe and sprinkler heads still remain on site and need to be removed. Management of the property is conducted by Elsinore/Anza/Murrieta Resource Conservation District (under contract to the County Roads HOA).

1 RC21000025; Project ID 07-014; Acquired 3/07/2007 2 RC21100007; Project ID 06-R01; Acquired 3/21/2006

216



7.11.3 Elsinore Lakeview Estates and Elsinore Lakeview Estates #2 Donation3

Species Monitoring The MSHCP Biological Monitoring Program did not perform focused surveys on the property in 2020. However, Coastal California Gnatcatcher (Polioptila californica californica) was documented at the property by Reserve Management Unit staff. Management Management actions consisted of occasional patrols by MSHCP Reserve Management Rangers at the two properties. A dumped refrigerator and television were found and removed from the property in 2020. While OHV activity on the property has had a marked decrease since its acquisition, the properties continue to be accessible to and moderately used by OHV riders. OHV activity mostly occurs on portions of a former track in the central valley of the Elsinore Lakeview Estates #2 property, but also occurs on the main ridges of the Elsinore Lakeview Estates property. Increased patrols of the area by MSHCP Rangers and the Sheriff department is warranted and recommended to discourage OHV activity at these sites. The rugged topography and general openness of habitat on the property makes physical access control measures, such as fencing infeasible. Installation of a gate at a choke point off the property to the southwest may decrease some OHV activity but is beyond the purview of the Reserve Management Unit and RCA. Additional acquisitions in the area will potentially provide for a more defensible reserve boundary in the area. Measures to address moderate erosion from the OHV activity in the central valley portion of the Elsinore Lakeview Estates #2 donation could be implemented.

7.11.4 Emerald Meadows4

Species Monitoring The MSHCP Biological Monitoring Program did not perform focused surveys on the property in 2020. Management In 2020, management activities on the Emerald Meadows property included periodic patrols, annual weed abatement, and trash pick-up. Weed abatement of the property included string trimming the property’s boundary along Riverview Drive and around an adjacent private property structure. Internal strips of the property were also tractor mowed. One mattress and several boxes of refuse were removed from the roadside edge of the property. In late 2019, the entire property

3 RC21000012 & 29; Project ID 06-005 & 06-41; Acquired 5/3/2005 & 12/29/2006 4 RC21000031; Acquired 3/15/2007

217



burned during what is known as the 46 Fire. In 2020, traces of the fire in upland portions of the property were nearly erased during spring growth with most of the upland habitat dominated by a similar complex of nonnative annual plants as was present during pre-fire conditions. Most of the cultivated English Walnut (Juglans regia) trees on the property did not recover from the fire and died. The riparian area that passes though the property is recovering well with native willow (Salix spp.) regrowth reaching to about 20 feet tall and very little nonnatives plants.

7.11.5 EMWD SJ River Conservation Easement5

Species Monitoring The MSHCP Biological Monitoring Program did not perform focused surveys on the property in 2020. Small mammal trapping was conducted on a small portion of the property by the San Diego Zoo to source animals for their translocation study. The trapping occurred at an old dump site which was slated for remediation. Healthy numbers of several covered species were documented during the trapping effort including Dulzura Kangaroo Rat (Dipodomys simulans), Los Angeles Pocket Mice (Perognathus longimembris brevinasus), Northwestern San Diego Pocket Mice (Chaetodipus fallax fallax), and San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat. Management The property continued to be beset by OHV riders and homeless issues in 2020. These issues, combined with the sensitive small mammal species that occupy the property, necessitated weekly patrols of the property by MSHCP Reserve Management Unit Rangers. Several factors continued to make OHV issues difficult to address in the area; the property is composed of several disjunct parcels within the historically high OHV rider use area of the San Jacinto River wash, the RCA’s parcels are surrounded and separated by an assortment of land owners which are beyond the purview of the MSHCP Reserve Management Unit, and effective OHV access controls are difficult to impossible to achieve within the channel of the San Jacinto River. Contacts or attempted contacts with OHV riders occurred on a roughly monthly basis at the property. Of equal regularity, was the repair of cut fencing. Several newly identified OHV access points from neighboring private properties were blocked by staff in 2020.

Occasional homeless encampments on the property continued to be addressed. In 2020, three new small homeless camps were located and cleared of occupants and refuse. In total, approximately one cubic yard of homeless refuse was removed from the property. Finally, several photo point monitoring stations on the property were visited on a quarterly basis

5 RC21000801; Project ID 12-E05; Acquired 5/31/2012

218



to document habitat conditions through time.

7.11.6 La Laguna Donation6 Species Monitoring The MSHCP Biological Monitoring Program did not perform focused surveys on the property in 2020. However, Coastal Western Whiptail (Aspidoscelis tigris stejnegeri) and Granite Spiny Lizard (Sceloporus orcutti) were observed on the property. Management The property was occasionally patrolled in 2020 with no issues to report. Several photo point monitoring stations on the property were visited on a quarterly basis to document habitat conditions through time, particularly following the Holy fire of 2018. While the property continues to recover from the fire with good native plant diversity and several obligate post-fire species, 35 (16%) of the property’s Coast Live Oaks (Quercus agrifolia) ultimately succumbed to the blaze.

7.11.7 Murrieta Market Place Donation7

Species Monitoring The MSHCP Biological Monitoring Program did not perform focused surveys on the property in 2020. Management The property was patrolled periodically during 2020 with little issues to report. On one occasion a small portion of the Warm Springs Creek tributary that passes through the property was found dammed with organic debris and a tarp. The dam was dismantled. The former riparian and vegetated swale/grassland restoration area which occurred on the property prior to its acquisition by the RCA, continued to show moderate to strong signs of success as measured by coverage and diversity of native plants. Nonnative vegetation within the restoration area was estimated at roughly 15% cover in 2020.

7.11.8 RCTC Conservation Easement8

Species Monitoring The MSHCP Biological Monitoring Program conducted Mountain Plover (Charadrius montanus) surveys on the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) Conservation Easement in 2020. However, no covered species were documented on the property during survey

6 RC21000026; Project ID 18-009; Acquired 3/15/2019 7 RC21000091; Project ID 18-012; Acquired 4/12/2019 8 RC21000036; Project ID 13-E02; Acquired 5/23/2013

219



efforts. Management

The property was checked on one occasion during 2020 by MSHCP Reserve Management staff. The site’s chainlink fence, which surrounds the entire property was found in disrepair. Approximately 300 feet of the southern boundary fence had been stolen along with the properties southwestern gate. RCTC was notified of the damage to the fence as they continue to manage the site’s vernal pool mitigation area.

7.11.9 Richmond American9 Species Monitoring The MSHCP Biological Monitoring Program performed Marsh Bird Surveys at the property in 2020. Cooper’s Hawk (Accipiter cooperii) was the only MSHCP Covered Species observed during surveys, however good diversity of noncovered birds were also documented. MSHCP Reserve Land Management Unit observed a Southwestern Pond Turtle (Actinemys pallida) at the property. Management The Richmond American property was a conservation easement originally recorded in 2003 in favor of The Environmental Trust that came to the RCA in 2007. Management activities at the property in 2020 included weed abatement using string trimmers adjacent to housing along the western boundary of the property as well as the roadside along Date Palm Street and Blue Spruce Lane. Weed abatement was limited to the removal of annual vegetation growing between established shrubs. The property was also patrolled on a roughly monthly basis, including following reports from a neighbor of homeless and illegal trail creation issues occurring there. While no homeless issues were discovered and the majority of trail building was on nearby private parcels, one trail was discovered on the adjacent RCA Winchester Road Donation property. The trail was dismantled and posted with no trespassing signs.

7.11.10 Riverpark Mitigation Bank Conservation Easement-Phase 110

Species Monitoring The MSHCP Biological Monitoring Program did not perform focused surveys on the property in 2020. Management While the property is managed by a separate entity, annual checks of the property for issues are

9 RC21000023; Project ID 07-011; Conservation Easement 2003-552497; RCA acquired 3/7/2007 10 RC21000106 ; Project ID 20-E01; Conservation Easement 2020-0090736 RCA Acquired 2/27/2020

220



required by the MSHCP Reserve Management Unit. Signs were added to the property boundary by staff early in 2020. The annual check of the property late in 2020 revealed numerous issues. A total of 15 breaches to the property’s fencing were found and mapped, including one 400-foot section of stolen fencing. In the property’s interior, moderate amounts of dumped debris was also documented. A map and photos of the issues were provided to the RCA so that the managing entity could be notified.

7.11.11 Southshore TTM 32013 Donation11

Species Monitoring The MSHCP Biological Monitoring Program did not perform focused surveys on the property in 2020. Management The property was patrolled occasionally during 2020 with no issues to report.

7.11.12 Spencer’s Crossing 12

Species Monitoring The MSHCP Biological Monitoring Program did not perform focused surveys on the property in 2020. Management In addition to periodic patrols of the property, the MSHCP Reserve Management staff began long term management of the newly acquired property’s riparian restoration area. Initial habitat management efforts at the property were focused on the removal of invasive Tamarisk (Tamarix ramosissima) trees, which had established on the property. Staff used chainsaws and loppers to remove about 40 moderate-sized Tamarisks and many smaller individuals from the southern portion of the property. Cut stumps of the Tamarisks were treated with undiluted Rodeo herbicide. In total, over 1940 pounds (0.87 ton) of Tamarisk were removed from the site and disposed of at a county landfill.

7.11.13 Spring Mountain Ranch Donation PA513

Species Monitoring The MSHCP Biological Monitoring Program did not perform focused surveys on the property in 2020.

11 RC21000027; Project ID 06-040; Acquired 12/29/2006 12 RC21000067; Project ID 20-002; Acquired 1/21/2020 13 RC21000021; Project ID 18-004; Acquired 1/26/2018

221



Management The property was patrolled on a monthly basis during 2020 with no issues to report other than the occasional vehicle driving on the property’s fire access road. Although several homeless encampments were cleared by MSHCP Reserve Management staff on the neighboring RCA property in 2020, the Spring Mountain Ranch Donation PA5 property itself has remained free of this activity. The entire area, including the property itself continued to be heavily impacted by large numbers of feral donkeys.

7.11.14 TET Sedco Hills14

Species Monitoring The MSHCP Biological Monitoring Program did not perform focused surveys on the property in 2020. Management In 2020, management activities on the TET Sedco Hills property included regular patrols of the area in an attempt to deter OHV activity. Cuts to a stout barricade blocking a key access point to the property on its eastern side, necessitated multiple repairs, rebuilt jumps nearby were dismantled on two occasions, and the property’s access road was graded by staff. While OHV activity had decreased substantially at the property since its acquisition, resulting in many of the old trails passively restoring with shrubs, frequent dirt bike activity persisted. The problematic nature of dirt bikes at the property stems from rugged topography, local and entrenched OHV use in the area, a lack of vehicular access into the property by MSHCP Reserve Management Unit staff. Additional OHV access controls in remote areas abutting private property should be considered to further reduce the activity on the property.

Several abandoned cars and old household refuse remain in place at the old house site in the far southern portion of the property. Inaccessibility to the former house site makes cleanup difficult to impossible, and efforts to approach a neighboring private landowner for access have been unsuccessful. Ultimately, a washed out and overgrown dirt road on the property will need to be graded to allow access so that the items can be removed.

14 RC21000036; Project ID 09-001; Acquired 03/31/2009

222



7.11.15 Teledyne15 Species Monitoring The Biological Monitoring Program conducted Delhi Fly Flower-loving Fly (Rhaphiomidas terminatus abdominalis; Delhi Fly) line-distance transect surveys at the property in 2020. The purpose of these surveys was to document the presence and reproduction of the federally endangered Delhi Fly at the site. Currently, the only population of Delhi Fly on conserved lands within the MSHCP plan area occurs at Teledyne. The 2020 surveys documented both presence and reproduction of Delhi Fly at the site. The overall numbers of Delhi Fly observations, as well as population estimates were somewhat below average.

During protocol surveys and land management activities several incidental MSHCP Covered Species were also documented using the property. These included Coastal Western Whiptail, Coastal California Gnatcatcher (Polioptila californica californica), Northern Harrier (Circus hudsonius), and San Diego Black-tailed Jackrabbit (Lepus californicus bennettii). Management MSHCP Reserve Management staff continued the Delhi Fly restoration and habitat improvement project at the property. Work completed on the site in 2020 included (1) maintenance with a quad and harrow on the ±2.5 miles of paths created in previous years in order to provide open non-vegetated areas, (2) hand weeding of 8.3 acres to remove non-native forbs (mainly Short-pod Mustard [Hirschfeldia incana], Saharan Mustard [Brassica tournefortii], and Golden Crownbeard [Verbesina encelioides]) prior to their seeding, and (3) bi-monthly visits to the property’s 10 photo point monitoring stations.

7.11.16 Toscana Donation Phase 1 and Phase 316

Species Monitoring The MSHCP Biological Monitoring Program conducted riparian bird surveys and marsh bird surveys on these properties in 2020, during which Downey Woodpecker (Picoides pubescens), Cooper’s Hawk, Double-crested Cormorant (Phalacrocorax auritus), Least Bell’s Vireo, Nashville Warbler (Leiothlypis ruficapilla), Southern California Rufous-crowned Sparrow (Aimophila ruficeps canescens), Yellow Warbler (Setophaga petechia), and Yellow-breasted Chat (Icteria virens) were documented utilizing the property. Belding's Orange-throated Whiptail (Aspidoscelis hyperythrus)

15 RC22100001; Project ID 03-013; Conservation Easement 2007-0514161; Recorded 8/09/2007; Conservation Easement 2008-0056649; Recorded 2/05/2008 16 RC21000094; Project ID 17-036 and 18-35; Acquired 12/20/2017 and 12/14/2018

223



was also observed on the property.

Management 2020 management activities on the property were limited to periodic patrols. During COVID-19 stay at home orders, increased pedestrian traffic occurred on the properties’ dirt roads, particularly north of Temescal Hills Drive. Staff resecured an HOA gate on one of these roads following reports of golf carts driving on it. The property is adjacent to, and within the Terramor housing development. Construction of this development was ongoing throughout 2020. Portions of the site continued to be managed by the Terramor developers (Foremost Companies), to fulfill mitigation requirements that include fencing large portions of the property, actively restoring or enhancing ±63 acres of riparian and Riversidian alluvial fan sage scrub, and installing a MSHCP-covered trail through the property. The areas of ongoing restoration continued to show good increases in biomass of native species.

Future Management Activities Major goals and tasks for 2021 include:

• Continue to plan and implement vegetation control measures, including the use of

prescriptive burns (once permitted), herbicide, grazing, and mechanical means to protect particularly sensitive habitats and species.

• Perform public outreach with the mountain bike community to raise awareness, garner support, and acquire volunteers to assist with addressing illegally created trails on RCA Reserve Lands.

• Maintain patrol and maintenance efforts. • Purchase and install fencing and other access controls, such as k-rails and/or boulder fences. • Perform necessary infrastructure improvements on existing properties to reduce erosion,

m a i n t a i n access, etc. • Continue to actively manage habitat at Burrowing Owl translocation sites. • Continue and increase cooperation and coordination with local law enforcement entities.

224

8.0 MONITORING ACTIVITIES




8.1 Goals and Objectives

The overall goals of the Biological Monitoring Program (Monitoring Program) are to collect data on the 146 Covered Species and associated vegetation communities over the 500,000-acre Conservation Area to assess the MSHCP’s effectiveness at meeting conservation objectives and to provide useful information to Reserve Managers in an adaptive management context. The MSHCP (Volume 2, Species Accounts) includes species-specific objectives that are intended to provide for the long-term conservation of all Covered Species. Species objectives direct the type and intensity of monitoring that is conducted by the Monitoring Program on an annual basis. Management decisions or actions are triggered if species objectives or MSHCP conservation goals are not met.

8.2 Inventory Phase and Long-term Monitoring Phase

Because there was little existing science-based data for the majority of Covered Species when the MSHCP was permitted, the Monitoring Program is being implemented in two phases: an initial Inventory and Assessment Phase (Inventory Phase) and a Long-term Monitoring Phase. The purpose of the Inventory Phase was to determine where Covered Species occur within the Conservation Area, to gather more information on their habitat preferences and life history (e.g., seasonal activity, reproduction requirements), and to develop efficient survey protocols for species detection. The development of science-based survey protocols is necessary to standardize data collection, to test the reliability of survey methods, to determine feasible and useful monitoring metrics, and to provide a confidence level that unobserved species are truly absent at the survey location, rather than overlooked.

The transition from Inventory Phase to Long-term Monitoring Phase has been gradual rather than abrupt. For species with short reporting requirements, such as Quino Checkerspot Butterfly (annual) or Coastal California Gnatcatcher (every three years), long-term monitoring is already in place. Multiple surveys for species with short reporting requirements have been conducted, providing the initial data points for population trend assessment. For species with longer reporting requirements such as Los Angeles Pocket Mouse (every eight years) and with species-specific monitoring objectives requiring significant development and testing, the transition from Inventory Phase to Long-term Monitoring Phase is ongoing.

The transition into long-term monitoring involves developing monitoring metrics that are both efficient to collect, and are robust measures of species status and population trend. The baseline monitoring objective for most Covered Species requires at least 75% of listed Core Areas or known locations to be documented as occupied at least once every eight years. Monitoring protocols that

225




provide additional information such as relative abundance of populations at occupied locations, reproductive success, or health of observed individuals will be employed whenever possible, to provide the most useful representations of species status. Monitoring Program staff have worked in collaboration with University of California Riverside Center for Conservation Biology staff to develop conceptual models of Covered Species and their habitats to help identify key population drivers and environmental stressors upon which management can act.

One significant task included in the Inventory Phase was development of a Long-term Monitoring Strategy document, as described in Section 5 of the MSHCP (Volume 1). This document explicitly describes the approach taken to meet the goals of the Monitoring Program. It does not include taxa-specific monitoring protocols, which are available from the Monitoring Program by request. Monitoring Program staff completed and delivered the Long-term Monitoring Strategy to the RCA and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW, previously Department of Fish and Game) as part of a State Wildlife Grant that expired on June 30, 2012.

The Long-term Monitoring Strategy describes a two-level design that gives priority to assessing the status of Covered Species as stated in the species-specific conservation objectives of the Plan which emphasize the continued occupancy of MSHCP-defined Core Areas or other areas of known occurrence. For some species, the objectives require that reproduction and/or minimum densities of individuals within species Core Areas be verified. The second level extends sampling for terrestrial vertebrates to the entire Conservation Area in a cost-efficient manner. The Long-term Monitoring Strategy document also includes chapters describing monitoring goals and objectives, sample design considerations, proper protocol development, data and information management strategies, collaboration, and communication with other organizations, and describes the organizational framework of the Monitoring Program.

One of the explicit goals of the Monitoring Program is to develop efficient long-term monitoring protocols that reduce redundancies by collecting information on multiple species where possible. For example, bird species co-occurring in similar habitat (e.g., willow riparian) during the breeding season can be detected using the same survey protocols. There will always be some Covered Species that occur in isolated pockets within the Conservation Area or that are difficult to detect using standard survey protocols; for these species, a focused survey effort will always be required.

8.3 Monitoring Program Operations

The Monitoring Program is implemented within the MSHCP Conservation Area on lands that are owned and managed by the various MSHCP participants and other entities and is comprised of both PQP (347,000 acres) and ARL (62,798 acres). CDFW was responsible for implementing the Monitoring Program for the first eight years of the Permit (MSHCP Volume 1, Section 6). To ensure consistency in monitoring efforts throughout the Conservation Area, the Monitoring

226




Program is overseen and implemented by a Monitoring Program Administrator. Effective July 1, 2012 when the State Wildlife Grant ended, the RCA assumed all funding responsibility for the Monitoring Program with the exception of one full time position provided by CDFW serving as the Avian Lead.

In the initial years of the Monitoring Program, extensive effort was devoted to setting up operating procedures, determining budgets, establishing contracts, purchasing supplies and equipment, hiring and training personnel, acquiring land access agreements, and coordinating with Reserve Managers within the Plan Area. These processes are now largely developed and only require updating (e.g., operating procedures), renewal (e.g., expiring right of entry agreements), or training when new personnel are involved (e.g., new Monitoring Program staff or Reserve Managers).

An integrated database to make information collected by the Monitoring Program manageable and accessible is now complete. Monitoring Program datasets that have been thoroughly proofed and certified complete by the Data Manager are submitted to CDFW’s Biogeographic Information and Observation System every year, as well as to local partnering agencies and entities. The structure needed to support a long-term Monitoring Program is in place.

8.3.1 Monitoring Program Personnel

The Biological Programs Manager (Administrator) oversees staff funded by the RCA and provided by CDFW. RCA-funded staff are provided through a contract with the Santa Ana Watershed Association (SAWA). Monitoring Program staff work together as a team to coordinate, develop, and implement required monitoring activities for the MSHCP.

At the beginning of 2020, 14 positions were filled in the Monitoring Program, 13 of which were funded by the RCA, with one funded by CDFW. Eight of these positions consisted of office-based staff and Taxa Leads and six full-time field biologists. On August 19, 2020 an additional field biologist was added to the crew to monitor the Clinton Keith Overcrossing project, bringing the total number to seven and the total number of staff to 15 (14 funded by RCA and one by CDFW). The Data Manager position became vacant and Karyn Drennen (Botany Lead) was chosen as the new MSHCP BMP Data Manager, effective September 23, 2019. The Botany Lead position was announced, interviews held, and a candidate was selected that began in January 2020, bringing the staff to a total of 16 (15 funded by RCA) in 2020.

Annual staffing levels, and therefore survey effort, reflect the budget available to the Monitoring Program. Although progress continues to be made towards documenting the current status of all 146 Covered Species, the availability of funds will ultimately determine whether or not the species objectives can be evaluated within the time frame designated by the MSHCP.

227




8.3.2 Training

All Monitoring Program field biologists are trained on local species identification, handling, and data collection methods. Field staff are cross trained in identification and survey techniques for multiple taxa to provide scheduling flexibility and increase staff efficiency. Specific training provided in any given year depends on the survey activities planned; however, safety training (e.g., wilderness first aid and CPR) is provided to all staff as necessary to keep certifications current. The Monitoring Program is required to use training programs approved by the Wildlife Agencies to ensure consistent data collection, uniform implementation of protocols, safe handling procedures, and appropriate experience with Covered Species (MSHCP Volume 1, Section 7). Training is provided both by experienced Monitoring Program biologists and by qualified outside entities (e.g., U.S. Geological Survey, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service). More information on species training received is presented in Appendix C – Staff Training.

8.3.3 Land Access Agreements and Coordination with Reserve Managers

The Monitoring Program only conducts surveys within the existing Conservation Area, which is composed of PQP lands and Additional Reserve Lands (ARL). Before surveys are conducted by the Monitoring Program, permission is obtained from the appropriate landowners or managing entities to access the survey areas. Land access agreements for 2020 for Monitoring Program activities are listed in Appendix B, Table B-1. Access Agreements for 2020 Surveys.

To facilitate land access and to better coordinate monitoring activities with management activities, Monitoring Program staff meets monthly with Reserve Managers (Reserve examples listed in Appendix B, Table B-1). At these meetings, Monitoring Program staff provide a description of current activities, including protocols and maps when relevant, and present species occurrence data and current monitoring results to the Reserve Managers. Management/Monitoring coordination meetings also feature a short presentation on a relevant topic. Speakers range from researchers at local universities, local biologists conducting similar monitoring or land management work, regulatory officials, as well as MSHCP staff presenting monitoring results. These meetings were suspended from April 2020 through the end of the year due to the Covid-19 pandemic. In 2020, meeting presentation topics prior to pandemic closures included:

• Developing a Data Driven Understanding of the Historical and Current Distribution of the At-risk Common Garter Snake (Thamnophis sirtalis) within the Santa Ana River Watershed.

• Does Associational Susceptibility by an Invasive Herbivore and Weed Explain Declines of a Native Desert Shrub?

228




8.4 Summary of 2020 Monitoring Activities and Evaluation of Progress Toward Achieving Measurable Objectives

The activities of the Monitoring Program are largely based on requirements of the MSHCP species-specific monitoring objectives outlined in Section 5 of the MSHCP (Volume I). Species objectives specify time intervals for detecting and reporting on each of the Covered Species in the Conservation Area. When species objectives do not specify a time interval, the status of the Covered Species must be reported at least once every eight years. In addition to species objectives, survey priorities are influenced by the quantity and quality of information available for each species (e.g., little or poor information means greater survey effort more frequently), whether another agency is already conducting surveys (less effort required by the Monitoring Program), relative ease of gathering information (e.g., Yellow Warbler detections during Least Bell’s Vireo surveys), and priority of the species to the RCA, Permittees, and Wildlife Agencies (e.g., Burrowing Owl is high priority).

The Monitoring Program only addresses species objectives that must be evaluated using biological surveys. Those species objectives, along with the frequency of the reporting requirement, whether the species was detected in the past or in the current reporting year, and whether or not the stated objectives are met are provided in Appendix B, Table B-2. Details of Covered Species Monitoring. The majority (121 of 146) of the Covered Species must be reported on at least once every eight years. The remaining 25 species have reporting requirements that vary between one and five years. The Monitoring Program has developed a timeline for the survey of Covered Species. The scheduling of surveys is approximate due to the prioritization process described above and because survey protocols can take more than one year to complete. Modifications to the timeline are expected to occur based on the results of each year’s monitoring efforts and available budget.

The 2020 reporting period represents the sixteenth full survey season for the Monitoring Program. The following survey activities were carried out in 2020 by the Monitoring Program:

• American Bittern Surveys

• Burrowing Owl Monitoring

• Least Bell’s Vireo Surveys and Nest Monitoring

• Mountain Plover Surveys

• Northern Harrier Surveys

• Overwintering Raptor Surveys

• White-tailed Kite Surveys

• Clinton Keith Overcrossing and Undercrossing Surveys

229




• Long-tailed Weasel Surveys

• Los Angeles Pocket Mouse Surveys

• California Newt Surveys

• Herpetofauna Array Surveys

• Terrestrial Reptile Surveys

• Delhi Sands Flower-loving Fly Surveys

• Quino Checkerspot Butterfly Surveys

• Brand’s Phacelia Habitat Enhancement

• Alkali Vegetation Surveys

• Rare Plant Surveys

• Incidental Species Sightings

Detailed survey reports for most projects, including the rationale for survey protocols, a description of methods, targeted species, and survey results can be found in Appendix A. For ongoing survey efforts with no change in the status of relevant species-specific monitoring objectives, survey reports will be completed when there are significant results to convey or when the effort concludes.

Evaluation of MSHCP monitoring objectives for Covered Species occurs annually. In 2020, Monitoring Program biologists conducted focused surveys for 47 of the 146 Covered Species in the Conservation Area. Thirty-five targeted Covered Species were detected and an additional 54 Covered Species were incidentally observed (Appendix B, Table B-2. Details of Covered Species Monitoring). In total, 89 of the 146 Covered Species were detected within the Conservation Area in 2020. These numbers are calculated based on a 30-meter (m) buffer around the Conservation Areas that is used in creating the Species Occurrence Dataset. Since June 2004, a total of 141 of the 146 Covered Species have been detected in the Conservation Area. A map of the Conservation Area is found in Section 1.1 of this report (refer to Exhibit 1-2).

Species-specific monitoring objectives, described in the Species Accounts from Volume 2 of the MSHCP, are evaluated at the interval indicated in the “Freq.” column of Appendix B, Table B-2, Details of Covered Species Monitoring. Objectives that have been met previously are subject to expiration based on the date the observations were last documented relative to the required monitoring frequency. When data collected by the Monitoring Program are determined to be sufficient to meet the species-specific monitoring objectives a “YES” appears in the “Obj. Currently Met” column. When data collected by the Monitoring Program indicate that the expected

230




conservation identified in the species accounts has not been achieved, a “NO” appears in the “Obj. Currently Met” column. When data collected by the Monitoring Program indicate that the expected conservation identified in the species accounts has only partially been achieved (e.g., one of two objectives), a “Partial” appears in the “Obj. Currently Met” column and additional information with regards to which objectives have been met is provided. The Monitoring Program has collected sufficient data to confirm that species-specific monitoring objectives for 66 Covered Species are currently met. Monitoring objectives have been partially met for 13 additional Covered Species (Appendix B, Table B-2).

According to Section 2.1.4 of the MSHCP (Volume I), 118 of the 146 Covered Species were considered to be adequately conserved at inception of the Plan. The remaining 28 Covered Species will be considered to be adequately conserved when certain conservation requirements are met as identified in the species-specific conservation objectives for those species. For 16 of the 28 species, particular species-specific conservation objectives, which are identified in Table 9-3 of the MSHCP (Volume I), must be satisfied to shift those particular species to the list of Covered Species Adequately Conserved. For the remaining 12 species, a Memorandum of Understanding must be executed with the Forest Service that addresses management for these species on Forest Service Land in order to shift these species to the list of Covered Species Adequately Conserved.

When data collected by the Monitoring Program are determined to be sufficient to meet the species-specific objectives described in Table 9-3 of the MSHCP (Volume I) a “YES” appears in the “Table 9-3 Requirement Met?” column of Appendix B, Table B-3. Status of Covered Species Not Adequately Conserved. When data collected by the Monitoring Program indicate that the expected conservation identified in Table 9-3 of the MSHCP (Volume I) has not been achieved a “NO” appears in the “Table 9-3 Requirement Met?” column. When data collected by the Monitoring Program indicate that the expected conservation identified in Table 9-3 has only partially been achieved (e.g., one of two objectives), a “Partial” appears in the “Table 9-3 Requirement Met?” column. The Monitoring Program has collected sufficient data to confirm that requirements listed in Table 9-3 of the MSHCP (Volume I) for nine Covered Species Not Adequately Conserved have currently been met and one has been partially met (Appendix B, Table B-3). In this report we use the species names referenced in the MSHCP. See Appendix B, Table B-4 for updated classification of species names that have changed since Plan adoption.

8.4.1 Burrowing Owl Monitoring

The species objectives for Burrowing Owl (Athene cunicularia hypugaea) require the conservation of five Core Areas, plus interconnecting linkages, containing a breeding population of 120 Burrowing Owls with no fewer than five pairs in any one Core Area. Core Areas listed in the MSHCP include: Lake Skinner/Diamond Valley Lake, playa west of Hemet, San Jacinto Wildlife Area/Mystic Lake area including Lake Perris, Lake Mathews, and along the Santa Ana River.

231




MSHCP Core Area descriptions can be found in Section 3.2.3 Cores and Linkages within the MSHCP Conservation Area of the MSHCP (Volume I).

Several Land Managers within the Conservation Area have installed artificial burrows and are managing vegetation to facilitate Burrowing Owl use of Core Areas. Reserve Managers or Monitoring Program biologists check all artificial and previously-occupied natural burrows at least three times each year (April, August, and December) to determine whether they are being used by Burrowing Owls, if there is burrow maintenance needed to make them hospitable, and whether nearby habitat needs to be modified or managed to further encourage use by Burrowing Owls.

During the 2020 breeding season, we monitored six owl pairs within the Lake Skinner/Diamond Valley Lake Core Area. We monitored six active burrows here, three of which showed evidence of nesting (Fig. 8-1a. Burrowing Owl Burrows Monitored in the Lake Skinner/Diamond Valley Lake Core Areas during the 2020 Pair Count Surveys). At least 12 fledglings were produced at two of these burrows (i.e., an average of six fledglings per successful breeding pair). We also monitored two pairs within the San Jacinto Wildlife Area/Mystic Lake Core Area in 2020. Both burrows showed evidence of nesting (Fig. 8-1b. Burrowing Owl Burrows Monitored in the San Jacinto Wildlife/Mystic Lake Core Area during the 2020 Pair Count Surveys). At least eight fledglings were produced at these two burrows (i.e., an average of four fledglings per successful breeding pair).

232




Figure 8-1a. Burrowing Owl Burrows Monitored in the Lake Skinner/Diamond Valley Lake Core Area During 2020 Pair Count Surveys.

233




Figure 8-1b. Burrowing Owl Burrows Monitored in the San Jacinto Wildlife/Mystic Lake Core Area during the 2020 Pair Count Surveys.

234




8.4.2 Clinton Keith Overcrossing and Undercrossing Surveys

The Monitoring Program monitors wildlife use with camera traps at the Clinton Keith Overcrossing and Undercrossing located at the Clinton Keith Road extension in Murietta, Riverside County (Figure 8-2. Clinton Keith Overcrossing and Undercrossing Camera Locations in 2020). There are two goals for surveys at Clinton Keith Overcrossing:

• Goal 1. Monitoring for Quino Checkerspot Butterfly (Euphydryas editha quino; Quino) following an established species-specific protocol.

• Goal 2. Monitoring wildlife use of the overcrossing and undercrossing via motion-triggered camera traps.

Quino Checkerspot Butterfly

The Quino Checkerspot Butterfly (Euphydryas editha quino; Quino) is federally listed as endangered and is sparsely distributed within the southeastern section of the Western Riverside County MSHCP Plan Area. In 2020, detection surveys for Quino were conducted over three repeat visits to the Clinton Keith Overcrossing structure during the Quino flight season. Timing of survey commencement was determined by the emergence of Quino larvae or adults at a nearby sentinel site located within the Southwestern Riverside County Multi-Species Reserve (MSR). Details on 2020 Quino surveys and locations can be found in Appendix A - 2020 Quino Checkerspot Butterfly (Euphydryas editha quino) Survey Report.

We used ArcGIS to overlay a grid with adjacent 250 m × 250 m grid squares across the survey area to delineate the sampling stations where we conducted focused area searches. Five sampling stations were targeted, one centered on the overcrossing, two north of the overcrossing, and two south of the overcrossing. Concurrent with Quino surveys, the surveyor recorded predominant habitat type and the species of dominant shrubs, condition of Quino host plants, presence of flowering nectar sources, presence of specific habitat attributes that indicate suitability for Quino, and noted any habitat disturbance. If a Quino adult or larvae were observed, then a GPS coordinate was recorded, as well as approximate counts of individuals. Data entry follows the standard protocol established by the Monitoring Program. One person enters data and a second person verifies the entries independently (i.e., quality control). The Data Manager verifies/validates the data, after which the Quino Survey Lead queries the data from the database and summarizes the results of survey effort.

Quino larvae was first detected at MSR on February 7, 2020 and the first Quino adult on February 20, 2020 (Appendix A). Soon after we commenced our first Clinton Keith Overcrossing survey on February 25, another on March 3, and the third visit was on March 30, 2020. There was a larger

235




gap between the second and third visit due to cool and rainy weather conditions. On each visit all five sampling stations were surveyed and no Quino was detected during any of the visits. Two host plants species were present throughout the sampling stations, California Plantain (Plantago erecta) and Owl’s Clover (Castilleja exserta). California Plantain was detected in all five of the sampling stations and Owl’s Clover was found in two out of five of the sampling stations. Both of these host plants were found on the Clinton Keith Overcrossing. Nectaring sources were detected throughout the sampling stations as well as cryptogamic soils, openings in grassland and forbland areas, bare ground, and hilltops on gently-sloping hills, all of which add up to suitable Quino habitat.

Other co-occurring butterfly and moth species detected include the Chalcedon Checkerspot Butterfly (Euphydryas chalcedona chalcedona), Common Buckeye (Junonia coenia), Acmon Blue (Plebejus acmon), Behr’s Metalmark (Apodemia virgulti), Cabbage White (Pieris rapae), Brown Elfin (Callophrys augustinus), Painted Lady (Vanessa cardui), Perplexing Hairstreak (Callophrys perplexa), Sara Orangetip (Anthocharis sara), Funereal Duskywing (Erynnis funeralis), and Geometer moths (Geometridae). Common Buckeye, which also use California Plantain as one of their host plants, was detected nectaring on the overcrossing. Both Painted Ladies and unidentified white butterflies (Pieridae) were detected flying through the overcrossing. The Chalcedon Checkerspot Butterfly was seen nectaring on the edge of the southern side of the overcrossing as well as using the overcrossing to get across and its larvae were detected on the Chaparral Beard Tongue (Keckiella antirrhinoides) shrubs located south of the overcrossing.

Quino, as well as needing host plants on and around the overcrossing, also need shelter to diapause. The addition of shrubs such as California Buckwheat (Eriogonum fasciculatum) might be a good addition to the Clinton Keith overcrossing. There are some young shrubs present such as Deerweed (Acmispon glabrus) and a few Black Sage (Salvia mellifera) growing in, so it might just be a matter of time for those shrubs to grow and for the overcrossing to start looking more suitable for Quino.

Wildlife Use Cameras

We monitored wildlife use on the Clinton Keith overcrossing and undercrossing using motion triggered cameras. A total of four motion-triggered camera stations were monitored at these locations in 2020 (Figure 8-2. Clinton Keith Overcrossing and Undercrossing Camera Locations in 2020). Cameras were selectively installed to best capture use of the landscape by wildlife. Each camera was programmed to take a burst of three photos followed by a 5-minute delay. To decrease observer bias, camera units were swapped annually; overcrossing cameras were switched with each other and undercrossing cameras were switched with each other. Cameras were serviced (i.e., batteries checked, memory cards removed and replaced) every other week. After servicing, biologists reviewed the photos, documenting the best photo to represent what animal triggered the camera. Animals were identified to species where possible. However, some photographs did not

236




allow for species identification and were either identified to genus, labeled as group (i.e., fox), or labeled unidentified. We are not able to identify individual animals and thus can only report on species occurrence rather than species abundance.

We determined the rate of occurrence for each species or grouping of animal by dividing the number of detections per species by the number of days the cameras were operable. The overcrossing cameras were in continuous operation for 365 days each. One of the cameras in the undercrossing was not turned on after a service visit which resulted in 14 days of no data collection. To account for animals’ photo-captured double counted (i.e., a Bobcat walked the length of the undercrossing and was captured on both cameras), we combined the photos from both cameras at each the overcrossing and the undercrossing. Then, we examined photo date and time to ensure multiple occurrences of the same species were not recorded within a half hour time period, which results in a number of unique images at each the overcrossing and the undercrossing.

We recorded 567 unique images on the Clinton Keith overcrossing. Coyote (Canis latrans) was the most common Covered Species captured (rate of occurrence = 0.52; 33% of photographs), with San Diego Black-tailed Jackrabbit (Lepus californicus bennettii; 0.01; 1%) and Bobcat (Lynx rufus; 0.003; 0.002%) our other mammalian Covered Species captured. Of our non-Covered Species, Desert Cottontail (Sylvilagus audubonii; 0.32; 21%) was the second most commonly photo-captured animal. Other photo-captured mammals include: California Ground Squirrel (Otospermophilus beecheyi), Domestic Dog (Canis familiaris), Virginia Opossum (Didelphis virginiana), kangaroo rat species (Dipodomys spp; all < 0.01; 1%). We photo-captured a variety of birds including; Say’s Phoebe (Sayornis saya), American Kestrel (Falco sparverius), Greater Roadrunner (Geococcyx californianus), California Towhee (Melozone crissalis), and Mourning Dove (Zenaida macroura). We captured images of butterflies and moths including; Checkered White Butterfly (Pontia protodice), and unknown White or Sulphur Butterfies (Pieridae Family; all ≤ (0.02 0.02%). We were unable to identify, to species or genus level, a large portion (36%) of the photo data from the overcrossing.

We recorded 412 unique images on the Clinton Keith undercrossing. For Covered Species, Coyote was the most often captured (0.52; 60%), followed by Bobcat (0.17; 20%) and San Diego Black-tailed Jackrabbit (0.003; 0.002%). Other photo-captured mammals that are not Covered Species include: California Ground Squirrel, Domestic Dog, Desert Cottontail, Striped Skunk (Mephitis mephitis), Mule Deer (Odocoileus hemionus), and Raccoon (Procyon lotor; all < 0.01; 1%). We photo-captured a variety of birds including Common Raven (Corvus corax), an unknown owl (likely a Great-horned Owl, Bubo virginianus), and Red-tailed Hawk (Buteo jamaicensis). We did

237




not photo-capture any butterflies or moths at the undercrossing. We were unable to identify, to species or genus level, a portion (12%) of the photo data from the undercrossing.

Human use at the Clinton Keith crossings is mixed. We classify the two types of human use: civilian and worker. Civilian activities include hiking, biking, and playing in Warm Springs Creek at the undercrossing. All of these activities are considered trespassing. Worker activities include habitat management of overcrossing by MSHCP Land Management team employees and Quino surveys by Monitoring Program staff. These activities result from obtaining permission to be on site. We report more photo-captured humans using the undercrossing (0.10; 11%) than the overcrossing (0.06; 4%). Civilian use at the overcrossing was 38%, while worker use was 62%. Civilian use of the undercrossing was 63%, while worker use was 38%. We are working with MSHCP Land Management team to decrease trespassing at both sites.

Additional analysis of Coyote and Bobcat data show each of these species use the overcrossing and undercrossing differently. Coyote use the overcrossing and the undercrossing equally, while Bobcat use the undercrossing almost exclusively. Bobcat used the undercrossing more often between the hours of 1800 and 0700 while Coyote used the overcrossing and undercrossing more often between 1800 and 1100. Monthly usage of the overcrossing and undercrossing varied between the species. We see peak use of the undercrossing by Bobcat in winter months, with February having the highest use, and the lowest use occurred in August. Coyote use of the undercrossing and overcrossing fluctuates between months. We verified data showing peak use of the overcrossing by Coyote in March and October while peak use of the undercrossing occurred in November. Coyote used the overcrossing more between August and October, and the undercrossing more between May and July.

We incidentally encountered (i.e., not photo-captured) a number of MSHCP Covered Species near the Clinton Keith over- and undercrossing which include; San Diego Horned Lizard (Phrynosoma coronatum blainvillei), Granite Spiny Lizard (Sceloporus orcutti), White-tailed Kite (Elanus leucurus), Bell’s Sage Sparrow (Artemisiospiza belli belli), and Southern California Rufous-crowned Sparrow (Aimophila ruficeps canescens).

238




Figure 8-2. Clinton Keith Overcrossing and Undercrossing Camera Locations in 2020.

239




8.4.3 Long-tailed Weasel Survey

The Long-tailed Weasel (Mustela frenata) is a MSHCP covered mammal species that occurs in almost all habitat types throughout the Plan Area. The MSHCP requires 75% occupancy in 18 Core Areas designated for Long-tailed Weasel as measured every eight years. Long-tailed Weasel currently occupy six Core Areas (33%); Existing Core A, Existing Core F, Existing Core H, Existing Core J, Existing Core K, and Proposed Core 2. MSHCP Core Area descriptions can be found in Section 3.2.3 Cores and Linkages within the MSHCP Conservation Area of the MSHCP (Volume I).

In 2020, the Monitoring Program surveyed for Long-tailed Weasel at two Core Areas: Existing Core C from January 1 to February 7, 2020 and Existing Core H from April 13 to May 1, 2020, for a total of 13 weeks (Figure 8-3 Long-tailed Weasel Station Locations in 2020).

To select survey locations, a habitat model was created that included all suitable habitat types (i.e., excluding open water and desert scrub). Survey arrays were then randomly distributed across modeled suitable habitat on conserved lands. Each array was composed of four baited, semi-enclosed trackplate boxes, a standard detection method for target species with discernable tracks. Each array was visited five times over a two-week period.

We surveyed Existing Core C using the methods described above. During these surveys, unidentified kangaroo rat (Dipodomys spp.), unidentified deer mouse (Peromyscus spp.), unidentified woodrat (Neotoma spp.), unidentified rodent, and unidentified animal were detected. Tracks are difficult to discern at the small mammal level, as track measurements often overlap with no distinguishing features within genera. Consequently, we were only able to identify to genera for this survey effort.

Our purpose for surveying the already occupied Existing Core H, was to refine our survey methods. Specially, we looked at how the addition of three survey visits, from five to eight visits, might increase our chances of detecting this elusive species. We chose to survey the Davis Unit of the San Jacinto Wildlife Area as a Long-tailed Weasel are often observed there. We selected survey array locations that would encompass the area where Long-tailed Weasel are most often seen (i.e., array locations were not random; Figure 8-3). Each array was composed of four baited, semi-enclosed trackplate boxes, and was visited eight times over a three-week period.

We detected Long-tailed Weasel on the fourth visit at one of the 12 trackplate boxes. We also detected; Striped Skunk (Mephitis mephitis), Virginia Opossum (Didelphis virginiana), Coyote (Canis latrans), unidentified deer mouse, and unidentified animal, which was likely a frog.

240




We detected Long-tailed Weasel within the time frame of our previous protocol. However, we believe continuing with a lengthened survey duration will facilitate increased detections of this species going forward. Mustelids are known to be elusive, therefore prolonged exposure to the trackplate box, bait, and lure may lead to increased detection. In addition to this modification, we plan to continually research and test additional methodologies such as, changing the bait type, modifying the trackplate box type (i.e., open ended), and utilizing a new lure. All of these are easy changes that can increase our chances of detecting Long-tailed Weasel. Modification to the survey methods should be completed in a stepwise fashion to help determine the efficacy of individual modifications. Finally, though Long-tailed Weasel was not detected during past survey efforts with less visits, the lack of detection does not indicate they are absent from these Core Areas.

241




Figure 8-3. Long-tailed Weasel Station Locations in 2020.

242




8.4.4 Herpetofauna Surveys

Herpetofauna Array Survey

The species objectives for covered terrestrial reptile species require the Monitoring Program to document the continued use of 75 percent or more of species-specific Core Areas listed in the MSHCP at least once every eight years. Historically, several covered terrestrial reptiles have eluded observation using traditional survey methods, such as visual encounter surveys. Therefore, it was determined an alternative survey method was needed to detect these species in the Plan Area.

Herpetofauna arrays are an effective way to detect reptile and amphibian presence and are particularly useful in determining the presence of cryptic and/or rare species. Three array sites consisting of three parallel fence lines with a terminal snake trap, and 2 pit-fall traps mid-way on each side of the fence were installed at three sites on Bureau of Land Management (BLM) south of Banning in September 2019 (Figure 8-4 2019-2020 Herpetofauna Array Locations).

Program biologists surveyed arrays in October and November in 2019 and April through October in 2020. Array stations were deployed for five days each month during optimal environmental conditions and checked each morning of the trap period. To prevent capture rate bias from weather and other variables, all three arrays were open simultaneously and checked as close together as possible. This survey method was utilized at this site specifically for detecting San Diego Banded Gecko (Coleonyx variegatus abbotti), Belding’s Orange-throated Whiptail (Cnemidophorus hyperythrus beldingi1), and Northern Red Diamond Rattlesnake (Crotalus ruber ruber1); however many other reptile and amphibian species covered by the Plan could be detected using this method, including San Diego Horned Lizard (Phrynosoma coronatum blainvillei1), Coastal Western Whiptail (Cnemidophorus tigris multiscutatus1), Granite Night Lizard (Xantusia henshawi henshawi1), Granite Spiny Lizard (Sceloporus orcutti), and Western Spadefoot (Scaphiopus hammondii1).

A total of 19 species were captured and identified during 2019-2020 surveys including eleven reptile, one amphibian, and seven mammal species. Though none of the target species were captured, three Covered Reptiles and one Covered Mammal were captured. Additionally, one of

1 For the purposes of this report, species common and scientific names reflect those referenced in the Plan.

Denoted species names have been updated through peer-reviewed literature and the taxonomic naming authorities (Appendix B-4).

243




the target species, Northern Red Diamond Rattlesnake was incidentally observed while navigating to the arrays (Tables 8-1 through 8-3).

Table 8-1. Summary of species captured at BLM array ACECHA-1. Common Name Scientific Name Covered Count

Brush Mouse Peromyscus boylii N 1 Cactus Mouse Peromyscus eremicus N 1 California Striped Racer Coluber lateralis N 1 Coastal Western Whiptail Aspidoscelis tigris stejnegeri Y 9 Deer Mouse Peromyscus maniculatus N 1 Dulzura Kangaroo Rat Dipodomys simulans Y 2 Gilbert's Skink Plestiodon gilberti N 1 Northwestern San Diego Pocket Mouse Chaetodipus fallax fallax Y 2 Red Coachwhip Coluber flagellum N 1 San Diego Gopher Snake Pituophis catenifer annectens N 1 Side-blotched Lizard Uta stansburiana N 37 Unidentified Lizard Squamata N 1 Western Fence Lizard Sceloporus occidentalis N 38


Blainville's Horned Lizard Phrynosoma blainvillii Y 3 Coastal Western Whiptail Aspidoscelis tigris stejnegeri Y 8 Dulzura Kangaroo Rat Dipodomys simulans Y 1 Gilbert's Skink Plestiodon gilberti N 1 Northwestern San Diego Pocket Mouse Chaetodipus fallax fallax Y 1 San Diego Alligator Lizard Elgaria multicarinata webbii N 3 San Diego Gopher Snake Pituophis catenifer annectens N 1 Side-blotched Lizard Uta stansburiana N 54 Unidentified Lizard Squamata N 1 Western Fence Lizard Sceloporus occidentalis N 25 Western Harvest Mouse Reithrodontomys megalotis N 2 Western Toad Anaxyrus boreas N 2


Blainville's Horned Lizard Phrynosoma blainvillii Y 1 California Meadow Vole Microtus californicus N 2 California Striped Racer Coluber lateralis N 1 Coastal Western Whiptail Aspidoscelis tigris stejnegeri Y 5 Dulzura Kangaroo Rat Dipodomys simulans Y 1 Gilbert's Skink Plestiodon gilberti N 1 Side-blotched Lizard Uta stansburiana N 56 Southern Pacific Rattlesnake Crotalus oreganus helleri N 2 Unidentified Lizard Squamata N 1 Unidentified Rodent Rodentia N 2

244




Western Fence Lizard Sceloporus occidentalis N 24 Western Harvest Mouse Reithrodontomys megalotis N 1 Western Patched-nosed Snake Salvadora hexalepis virgultea N 2

245




Figure 8-4. 2019-2020 Herpetofauna Bureau of Land Management Array Locations.

246




Terrestrial Reptile Surveys

The objectives for covered terrestrial reptile species require the Monitoring Program to document the continued use of 75% or more of species-specific Core Areas listed in the MSHCP at least once every eight years (Dudek & Associates 2003). The 2020 terrestrial reptile survey efforts focused on the following five reptile species covered by the MSHCP: Southern Rubber Boa (Charina bottae umbratica1), San Diego Mountain Kingsnake (Lampropeltis zonata pulchra1), San Bernardino Mountain Kingsnake (Lampropeltis zonata parvirubra1), Southern Sagebrush Lizard (Sceloporus graciosus vandenburgianus1), and Granite Night Lizard (Xantusia henshawi henshawi1). Prior efforts to meet the MSHCP terrestrial reptile objectives have combined methodologies such as artificial cover, nocturnal and diurnal transect surveys, and suitable habitat area searches. In 2020, due to Covid-19 restrictions, we initiated these unplanned surveys to keep biologists in the field during social distancing requirements. Because we didn’t have the ability to prepare for formal survey planning and training, all detections from these surveys were considered incidental observations. Survey methodology consisted of untimed visual area searches of suitable habitat within Core Areas from June 9, through November 3, 2020, in an attempt to meet multiple outstanding species objectives.

Neither Southern Rubber Boa, San Diego Mountain Kingsnake nor San Bernardino Mountain Kingsnake were reported over the course of the survey period. However, there were several observations of other Covered Reptiles. Although we documented Southern Sagebrush Lizard in one out of two Core Areas (50%) and Granite Night Lizard in two out of nine Core Areas (22%), these sightings did not meet the 75% occupancy objective for these species. An additional seven Covered Species that include Arroyo Toad (Bufo microscaphus1), Belding’s Orange-throated Whiptail (Cnemidophorus hyperythrus beldingi1), San Diego Horned Lizard (Phrynosoma coronatum blainvillei1), Coast Range Newt (Taricha torosa torosa1), Coastal Western Whiptail (Cnemidophorus tigris multiscutatus1), Granite Spiny Lizard (Sceloporus orcutti) and Northern Red Diamond Rattlesnake (Crotalus ruber ruber1) were all observed over the course of the survey period. These sightings contribute to ongoing assessments of species-specific objectives. Because there was no change in the status of relevant species-specific monitoring objectives and annual survey efforts are continuing, a standalone technical report was not produced for this survey effort. Results from previous years and a full description of survey methods can be found in the Biological Monitoring Program Terrestrial Reptile Survey Report, available from the RCA website at https://www.wrc-rca.org/species-surveys/.



247




8.4.5 Alkali Vegetation Survey

The MSHCP requires vegetation analyses of the major vegetation communities found throughout the Plan Area. In May 2020, a baseline assessment of the alkali vernal playas in Hemet and Perris was conducted in collaboration with Riverside County Parks (Figure 8-5. 2020 Vegetation Assessments at the Hemet Alkali Vernal Playas). We used a point intercept transect method to assess the species richness and structure of the habitat. Across the nine sites, we walked a total of 63 randomly distributed transects with 10 point drops (i.e., location of pole placement for sampling) per transect. At each point, ground cover and species richness were recorded by counting the number of individuals of each species and the height class of each species hit (i.e., touching the pole). Instead of identifying each plant to species, we defined functional groups which include non-native grasses, native forbs, non-native forbs, and covered rare species. The most common ground cover type was thatch and the most abundant functional group was non-native grasses. Thatch is defined as a matted layer of mostly non-native grass lying at an angle of 45 degrees or less. Covered species accounted for two percent of all plant hits along the transects and included Vernal Barley (Hordeum intercedans), Smooth Tarplant (Centromadia pungens spp laevis), and San Jacinto Valley Crownscale (Atriplex coronata var. notatior). Non-native grasses and forbs, including Stinknet (Oncosiphon piluliferum), Torrey Seepweed (Sueda nigra), and Slender Leaved Ice Plant (Mesembryanthemum nodiflorum), comprised 88 percent of all plant hits. Native grasses and forbs comprised the remaining ten percent of plant hits. The Warren Road property had the highest number of covered plant species hits while the Dilworth #2 property had the most hits of native plant species (Figure 8-5).

248




Figure 8-5. 2020 Vegetation Assessments at the Hemet and Perris Alkali Vernal Playas.

249




8.4.6 Brand’s Phacelia Habitat Enhancement

The MSHCP requires conservation of two occurrences of Brand’s Phacelia (Phacelia stellaris; Phacelia), a Narrow Endemic Plant, along the Santa Ana River. However only one of these populations, which occurs in the Santa Ana Wilderness Area, was extant (still in existence) at the time of the MSHCP implementation. The objective of the Habitat Enhancement Project is to improve the habitat of the sole remaining population within the MSHCP Plan Area by removing non-native competitors and controlling habitat disturbance. Results of this project will advise future habitat management for this site.

The Brand’s Phacelia Habitat Enhancement Project started in 2017 and 2020 represents the fourth year of data collection. The study design uses a randomized block distribution in which each 1-meter by 2.5-meter study plot (n = 48; of which there were 48 plots) was assigned one of four treatments: Weeding Only, Disturbance Only (raking the soil), Weeding + Disturbance, or Control (no treatment applied). Treatments for 2020 surveys were applied in December 2019 and January 2020. The first individuals of Phacelia germinated in January 2020 and surveys were conducted from January through April 2020. A total of 2488 Phacelia plants germinated within the study plots. This total was calculated using the highest count of Phacelia plants present at any one time in each plot. Of plants germinated within plots, 87% occurred in either Weeding + Disturbance (1186 individuals) or Disturbance Only plots (965 individuals). However, these results were not statistically significant due to the low number of individuals (Kruskal-Wallis test, H=1.84, p=0.61). On average, the width of the “rosette” (the ends of the longest leaves tip to tip through the central axis of the plant) and reproductive vigor (number of inflorescences [complete flower head] per plant) were highest in Weeding + Disturbance plots (mean width = 6.0 cm, mean number of inflorescences = 17.3), with Disturbance Only plots having the second largest and most reproductive plants (mean width = 3.5 cm, mean number of inflorescences = 10.7).

Species composition of the other vegetation occurring in the plots was measured using a point intercept survey consisting of 32 points, arranged in an 8 x 4 grid, overlaid on each plot. Individual plants of all species and all ground cover types (bare, plant litter, moss/crust, and other) were recorded at each of the 32 points within each plot. These data were collected after Phacelia surveys were completed and have not yet been analyzed for potential correlations.

The year 2020 was the first year with a significant number of plants germinating in the study plots (maximum total of 2,488), compared to a total of 53 plants that germinated in plots in 2019. While we have started to see trends, we expect that one or two more years of data will be needed to make appropriate management recommendations for this population, which at that time, a complete data analysis will be conducted and a comprehensive report will be produced. In December 2020, plot treatments began in preparation for the 2021 survey year of the Brand’s Phacelia Habitat Enhancement Project.

250




8.4.7 Incidental Species Sightings Covered Species incidentally observed during unrelated survey activities are recorded by Monitoring Program biologists to increase knowledge of the distribution of Covered Species in the Conservation Area. Incidental observations are different than focused survey data as the methods are not standardized and only positive data are recorded. However, recording incidental observations of species that are difficult to detect is extremely important. Incidental observation data may be used as current documentation of species presence at a given location, as a starting point for future focused survey efforts, and to provide information about appropriate habitat for the detected species in the future.

Incidental observations of Covered Species made during surveys in 2020 were entered into the Monitoring Program’s centralized database and these data were incorporated into taxa-specific reports as appropriate (Appendix B-2). All observations of Covered Species, whether made by focused survey or incidentally, are used when making a determination of whether or not species-specific objectives have been met for a given reporting period.

8.5 Additional Survey Reports

Detailed survey reports for most projects, including the rationale for survey protocols, a description of methods, targeted species, and survey results can be found in Appendix A. In addition to the survey summaries above, the following detailed survey reports were prepared in 2020 and are available from the RCA website at https://www.wrc-rca.org/species-surveys.

• American Bittern Surveys

• Least Bell’s Vireo Surveys and Nest Monitoring

• Mountain Plover Surveys

• Northern Harrier Surveys

• Overwintering Raptor Surveys

• White-tailed Kite Surveys

• Los Angeles Pocket Mouse Surveys

• Herpetofauna Array Surveys

• Terrestrial Reptile Surveys

• Delhi Sands Flower-loving Fly Surveys

• Quino Checkerspot Butterfly Surveys

251




• Rare Plant Surveys

8.6 Recommendations and Feedback for Adaptive Management

Effective land and species management requires current information regarding vegetation communities, wildlife habitats, species status, and population trends. The Monitoring Program coordinates and shares information with Reserve Managers throughout the MSHCP reserve system as data are collected and processed. Management/monitoring coordination meetings are held on a monthly basis to provide summaries of results and a venue for information exchange. The following suggestions for adaptive management are based on Monitoring Program surveys and other entities providing data to the Monitoring Program.

American Bittern. Continue efforts to bring Collier Marsh into Conservation. This marsh is located on the west side of Collier Avenue across from the Outlets at Lake Elsinore. Adjacent marshes that are currently conserved are likely inadequate for American Bitterns, but this marsh contains healthy stands of emergent vegetation and may support American Bitterns.

Finally, we recommend that at least a few ponds within San Jacinto Wildlife Area be allowed to retain water throughout the American Bittern breeding season. Ponds are currently allowed to dry following waterfowl hunting season, which ultimately precludes use by American Bitterns. The San Jacinto Wildlife Area is one of the few locations within the Plan Area where ponds and marshes are consistently and actively managed. Furthermore, we have detected American Bitterns here as recently as 2017. If managed differently, these ponds and marshes may have the potential to serve as breeding sites for American Bitterns and other marsh-dependent species. Location maps can be found in the 2020 American Bittern Survey Report (Appendix A).

Burrowing Owl. The species objectives for Burrowing Owl require the conservation of five Core Areas, plus interconnecting linkages, containing a breeding population of 120 owls with no fewer than five pairs in any one Core Area. The Core Areas listed in the Plan are Lake Skinner/Diamond Valley Lake (which includes the conserved El Sol and Johnson Ranch properties), playa west of Hemet, San Jacinto Wildlife Area/Mystic Lake area including Lake Perris, Lake Mathews, and along the Santa Ana River (Figures 8-1a & 1b in Section 3 of Volume I of the MSHCP).

Since 2006, the RCA’s Management Program and Monitoring Program have collaborated with local Reserve Managers on an adaptive management project with the goal of increasing Burrowing Owl habitat within the Conservation Area. This collaborative effort has grown to include management and monitoring of natural and artificial burrows at the Southwestern Riverside County Multi-Species Reserve, Lake Mathews/Estelle Mountain Reserve, El Sobrante Landfill, Lake Perris State Recreation Area, Johnson Ranch, San Jacinto Wildlife Area, and El Sol property.

252




Reserve Managers have installed artificial burrows and managed vegetation within several Core Areas to facilitate Burrowing Owl use of Core Areas, including installing at least 77 burrows within the Lake Skinner/Diamond Valley Lake Core Area, at least 7 in the San Jacinto Wildlife Area/Mystic Lake Core Area including Lake Perris, and at least 52 in the Lake Mathews Core Area (Figures 8-1a & 1b in Section 3 of Volume I of the MSHCP). Cooperation with Reserve Managers has expanded to include a schedule and shared data sheet for monitoring Burrowing Owl burrows. The collected data are stored in a Monitoring Program database.

Based on surveys in recent years by the Monitoring Program, Management Program, and Reserve Managers, only the Lake Skinner/Diamond Valley Lake Core Area currently supports the minimum number of breeding pairs of Burrowing Owls (Figure 8-1a). Burrowing owls need open areas with sparse or low-growing vegetation. Appropriate active management tools may be needed to control non-native grasses (e.g., grazing, mowing, prescribed fire). These management actions would likely benefit several other Covered Species such as Stephens’ Kangaroo Rat and Mountain Plover. A Burrowing Owl Translocation Program document is also being developed. To achieve the conservation objectives for Burrowing Owl, management of habitat within the remaining Core Areas and active translocation of Burrowing Owls will likely be necessary. Additional land that supports Burrowing Owls may also need to be acquired.

Mountain Plover. In general, many of the areas near our survey routes would need to be actively managed and modified to create suitable Mountain Plover habitat. The topography was oftentimes flat or gently sloping, and the main reason why sites were unused by Mountain Plovers was likely due to relatively tall vegetation height. Some investigators suggest creating suitable sites for Mountain Plovers by replicating the effects of grazers. For example, establishing supplemental feed sites on flat terrain for domestic cattle would lead to those areas being cleared of vegetation, thereby creating bare ground preferred by Mountain Plovers, and would disturb the soil in such a way that attracts this species without reducing arthropod abundance. These supplemental feed sites should be moved periodically to replicate movements by historic herds of grazing animals, which would create patches of cleared vegetation across the landscape.

Active management to create overwintering Mountain Plover habitat has the additional benefit of creating suitable habitat for other species covered by the MSHCP. For example, moderate to high levels of grazing would likely benefit Ferruginous Hawks (Buteo regalis) that also winter within the Plan Area. This type of vegetation management may also benefit Burrowing Owls, which have similar habitat requirements (i.e., short vegetation or bare ground, and gently sloping or flat terrain).

Overwintering Raptors. Because all three target species, Ferruginous Hawk (Buteo regalis), Merlin (Falco columbarius), and Prairie Falcon (Falco mexicanus) inhabit grasslands in the nonbreeding season, conservation for the species should focus on this habitat type. Management

253




should maintain the general conditions of grasslands where we regularly detect the species (e.g., near Lake Mathews, the Davis Unit of the San Jacinto Wildlife Area, and south of Lake Skinner. Refer to Appendix A for additional details in the 2020 Survey Report.

White-tailed Kite. Conservation of land for White-tailed Kites should focus on sites that have abundant diurnal prey, primarily California Voles (Microtus californicus), Western Harvest Mice (Reithrodontomys megalotis), and House Mice (Mus musculus), and should also contain trees that could support nests. Based upon our 2020 data, such trees could be Populus spp., Quercus spp., or Salix spp., that are approximately 15 m tall.

Quino Checkerspot Butterfly. We have not detected Quino in the Warm Springs Creek Core area over the past 12 years of survey efforts. If drought conditions continue, future survey efforts in this core may be unproductive; however, since our knowledge of Quino ecology is incomplete, there may be a chance that Quino will re-colonize these sites in the future. A wildlife bridge that spans Clinton Keith Road was completed in 2018, which may facilitate Quino movement between formerly fragmented habitat. We recommend that survey efforts be expanded to other areas with suitable habitat within this Core (Figure 8-2) and for encroaching non-native grasses to be removed.

Focused discussion and strategies are needed to address conversion of suitable habitat to unsuitable habitat in the Sage Core area and to expand and/or redirect focused surveys efforts in the future to other areas including those at higher elevation. For additional details refer to the 2020 Quino Checkerspot Butterfly (Euphydryas editha quino) Survey Report located in Appendix A.

Delhi Sands Flower-loving Fly. We recommend continuing to monitor the Delhi Sands Flower-loving Fly (Rhaphiomidas terminatus abdominalis; Delhi Fly) annually.

We plan to conduct the more demanding line-transect study again in 2021 to continue to monitor impacts of management activities and Delhi Fly population fluctuations. Vegetation and soil characteristics should continue to be monitored in conjunction with ongoing management actions conducted as described by the Delhi Sands Flower-loving Fly Habitat Management Plan (Marchant 2005).

In addition to the vegetation surveys, we recommend continuing to perform ground-dwelling arthropod surveys in order to track the relative abundance and richness of the arthropod community, which the predacious Delhi Fly larvae presumably utilize as a food resource (Ken Osborne, consultant, personal communication and Rick Rogers, entomologist, personal communication). These data could additionally serve as a habitat quality indicator of the Delhi

254




sand dunes at Teledyne. Location maps can be found in the 2020 Delhi Sands Flower-loving Fly Survey Report (Appendix A).

Covered Amphibians and Aquatic Reptiles. Exotic species such as the American Bullfrog (Lithobates catesbeianus), Red-eared Slider (Trachemys scripta elegans), Western Mosquitofish (Gambusia affinis), and African Clawed Frog (Xenopus laevis) exist in many waterways within the MSHCP Conservation Area and have significant negative impacts on native amphibians and aquatic reptiles by direct predation and competition for limited resources. At a minimum, the habitat within Core Areas that are infested with exotic species would be greatly enhanced by removal of these exotics. Although reintroduction of some covered amphibians may be an appropriate management action (e.g., Mountain Yellow-legged Frog, Rana muscosa), no reintroductions of Covered Species should be considered for areas currently infested with exotic species until management actions have controlled or eradicated exotic species. Monitoring Program biologists have participated in MSHCP Management Program-led efforts to locate and exterminate aquatic exotic species on RCA-managed properties when possible. Further details can be found in Section 7.0 – Management Activities of this report.

No California Red-legged Frogs (Rana aurora1; CRLF) have been found in Western Riverside County since one male was seen in Cole Creek at the Santa Rosa Plateau Ecological Reserve (Section 3.2.3 in Volume I of the MSHCP) in September 2003. The species is not known to currently occur in the Plan Area despite the apparent presence of suitable habitat. Significant effort was expended by the Monitoring Program during the Inventory Phase to survey for CRLF within Core Areas, and to evaluate and identify suitable habitat for this species within the MSHCP Conservation Area. The probable causes of the decline of CRLF are introductions of non-native predators such as American Bullfrogs and predatory fish, habitat loss due to development and agriculture, pesticides, and pathogens such as Chytrid Fungus (Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis). Without future active management (e.g., exotic species removal, species translocation) extensive additional efforts to locate CRLF within the MSHCP Conservation Area would be an inefficient expenditure of resources. USGS is currently spearheading a relocation effort and subsequent monitoring at the Santa Rosa Plateau.

In addition to documenting the distribution of Western Pond Turtle (Clemmys marmorata pallida1) populations throughout Western Riverside County, we are reviewing the current turtle trapping protocol to potentially amend it to include population estimates. Population estimates would enable Reserve Managers to better monitor the status of populations over time and could potentially provide valuable information regarding population responses to management actions.



255




Furthermore, a comprehensive assessment of upland habitat usage would help facilitate appropriate management. This would involve a more thorough evaluation of landscape composition, such as collecting parameters of upland slope and distance to suitable nesting locations. Because Western Pond Turtles do not nest in the aquatic system itself, it is important to assess all of their habitat requirements to most effectively manage for sustainable populations within the MSHCP Conservation Area.

Rare Plants. The sole remaining occurrence of Parish’s Brittlescale (Atriplex parishii), last observed in 2018 by Fred Roberts (Botanical Consultant, personal communication), occurs in the Hemet Vernal Pool Complex within Non-contiguous Habitat Block 7 on Metropolitan Water District property (APN 465030030; Section 3.2.3 in Volume I of the MSHCP). It is recommended that this property be conserved and if feasible, included in MSHCP conservation lands.

8.7 Acknowledgements

We thank the land managers in the MSHCP Plan Area, who in the interest of conservation and stewardship facilitate Monitoring Program activities on the lands for which they are responsible. Monitoring Program staff who conducted surveys in 2020 were: Masanori Abe, Andrea Campanella, Karyn Drennen, Collin Farmer, Tara Graham, Marisa Grillo, Jennifer Hoffman, Cristina Juran, Amanda Leach, Robert Packard, Nicholas Peterson, Nathan Pinckard, Esperanza Sandoval, and Taylor Zagelbaum. Assistance with data collection was provided by Jonathan Reinig, Ana Sawyer and Joseph Sherrock (Riverside County Regional Park and Open-Space District), and Eliza Perez and Vaneza Rodriguez (volunteers).

256

9.0 REFERENCES



9.0 REFERENCES

Cook, R. R., A. J. Malisch, and A.E. Collada. 2012. Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan. Long-term Monitoring Strategy. Western Riverside County MSHCP Biological Monitoring Program. In partnership with California Department of Fish and Game and Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority. June 2012.

Evens, J.M. and A.N. Klein. 2006. “A New Model for Conservation Planning: Vegetation Mapping in Western Riverside County.” Fremontia, 34(2): 11-18, April 2006.

Riverside, County of. 2003. General Plan.

Riverside, County of. 2003. Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP). June 2003.

Riverside County Habitat Conservation Agency. 1996. Habitat Conservation Plan for the Stephen’s Kangaroo Rat in Western Riverside County California. March 1996.

United States Fish and Wildlife Service and California Department of Fish and Game. 2003. “Completion of the Land Acquisition Portion of the Reserve Expansion Requirement of the Long-Term Habitat Conservation Plan for the Stephens’ Kangaroo Rat and Exchange of the SKR Management Area of the Former March Air Force Base.” Letter from United States Fish and Wildlife Service and California Department of Fish and Game to Carolyn Syms Luna, Executive Director, Riverside County Habitat Conservation Agency and Philip Rizzo, Executive Director, March Joint Powers Authority, December 2003.

Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority. 2011. Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP). “Minor Amendment 2007-01”, July 21, 2009.

Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority and Riverside-Corona Resource Conservation District. 2011. Memorandum of Understanding By and Between the Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority and the Riverside Corona Resource Conservation District Coordinating Habitat management for RCRCD Lands and Potential Restoration for RCA Lands, June 15, 2010.

257

APPENDIX A

Additional Technical Reports and

Information Used to Prepare the

RCA 2020 Annual Report

258

APPENDIX A


Annual Report (January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020) A-1

Additional Reports and Information The following reports, methods, procedures, and information contain information that was utilized or developed during the reporting period of January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020. The reports, documents, and maps are provided as supporting information to the annual report and have been published in separate technical reports on the internet in PDF format. The Annual Report, Appendices, Survey Reports, Maps and Documents can be found at the following location: https://www.wrc-rca.org/document-library/annual-reports/ RCA MSHCP Technical Reports 1. GIS Methodology, Process and Procedures

This document was created to provide the details on how the Permit and Project information was assembled from the Permittees. The document describes the files and process that was used to prepare the information for the Annual Report, as well as the datasets used for Rough Step reporting. The methodology, process, and procedures using esri’s GIS software to assemble the numbers for the Rough Step vegetation, Area Plans, Area Plan Subunits and jurisdictions for both losses and gains are described. Included is a map product showing the gains and losses of the MSHCP.

2020_Annual_Report_Gains_Losses_Procedures.pdf 2020_AnnualReport_Permit_Process_GIS_Methods.pdf

AnnualReport_GainLoss_Cumulative.pdf 2. Monitoring Program Survey Results

Separate documents and reports account for the survey activities undertaken by the Biological Monitoring Program for the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) during 2020. The Biological Monitoring Program monitors the distribution and status of the 146 Covered Species within the Conservation Area to provide information to Permittees, land managers, the public and the Wildlife Agencies (i.e., the California Department of Fish and Wildlife and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service). Monitoring Program activities are guided by the MSHCP Species Objectives for each Covered Species, the MSHCP information needs identified in Section 5.3 or elsewhere in the MSHCP, and the information needs of the Permittees. https://www.wrc-rca.org/document-library/annual-reports

259

https://www.wrc-rca.org/document-library/annual-reports/

https://www.wrc-rca.org/document-library/annual-reports

https://www.wrc-rca.org/document-library/annual-reports

APPENDIX A



2020 American Bttern Report.pdf 2020 Delhi Sands Flower-loving Fly Report.pdf 2020 Least Bell’s Vireo Report 2020 Los Angeles Pocket Mouse Report.pdf 2020 Mountain Plover Report.pdf 2020 Northern Harrier Report.pdf 2020 Overwintering Raptor Report.pdf 2020 Quino Checkspot Butterfly Report.pdf 2020 Rare Plants Report.pdf 2020 Stream Report.pdf 2020 White-tailed Kite Report.pdf

3. Clerical Amendments to the MSHCP The RCA did not process or identify any clerical amendments to the MSCHP in 2020.

4. Agricultural Operations Database

The Implementation Agreement for the MSHCP, in Section 11.3, required that the RCA and County establish an Agricultural Operations database and report on agricultural activities, such as agricultural grading permits issued each year. Agricultural grading permits are included within the GIS Loss files for each reporting year.

WRC_Agricultural_Operations.shp (includes all data up to 12/31/2020) GIS file

AG_10000_Cap_MSHCP.shp (includes all data up to 12/31/2020) GIS file AnnualReport_Agricultural_Operations.pdf map

5. Conservation by Area Plan Subunits

Appendix Table 1, Conservation Targets by Area Plan Subunit, includes the goal acreages within each subunit of each Area Plan. As discussed above, the subunits are subsets of each Area Plan targeted for conservation. Acquisitions made over the calendar year of 2020 by subunit are listed below. The last column provides a context within which to compare the conservation achieved during the reporting period with conservation achieved to date. Appendix Table 1 shows that progress is being made toward achieving the target acreage goals within the subunits.

260

APPENDIX A



Appendix Table 1 Conservation Goals by Area Plan Subunit

Area Plan Subunit Low** Midpoint** High**

Conservation (January 1,

2020 – December 31,

2020)*

Acres Conserved (February

2000 to December 31,

2020)*

Eastvale Area Plan

SU1 – Santa Ana River Central 145 220 290 0 107

Not within a Subunit NA NA NA 0 0 Subtotal within Area Plan 145 220 290 0 107

Elsinore Area Plan SU1 – Estelle Mountain/Indian Canyon 4,100 5,065 6,030 8 98 SU2 – Alberhill 1,760 2,385 3,010 22 2,164 SU3 – Elsinore 925 1,370 1,815 0 1,012 SU4 – Sedco Hills 2,415 3,130 3,845 28 12 SU5 – Ramsgate 1,645 2,090 2,535 82 1,103 SU6 – Steele Peak 855 1,070 1,280 0 1,117 Not within a Subunit NA NA NA 5 98 Subtotal within Area Plan 11,700 15,110 18,515 145 6,406

Harvest Valley/Winchester Area Plan

SU1 – French Valley/Diamond Valley Lake Connection

130 135 145 0 0

SU2 – Hemet Vernal Pool West 300 380 460 24 224 Not within a Subunit NA NA NA 0 0 Subtotal within Area Plan 430 515 605 24 224

Highgrove Area Plan SU1 – Sycamore Canyon/Box Springs Central

95 140 180 0 89

SU2 – Springbrook Wash North 250 370 495 0 217 Not within a Subunit NA NA NA 0 157 Subtotal within Area Plan 345 510 675 0 463

Jurupa Area Plan SU1 – Santa Ana River North 135 190 245 0 10 SU2 – Jurupa Mountains 445 750 1,055 11 445

261

APPENDIX A






2020)*



2020)* SU3 – Delhi Sands Area 310 440 570 0 0 Not within a Subunit NA NA NA 50 50 Subtotal within Area Plan 890 1380 1870 61 505

Lake Mathews/Woodcrest Area Plan

SU1 – Lake Mathews East 1,140 1,410 1,680 0 59 SU2 - Dawson Canyon (Temescal Wash East)

815 950 1,090 159 645

SU3 – Gavilan Hills West 1,175 1,825 2,475 20 181 SU4 – Good Hope West 85 155 225 0 21 Not within a Subunit NA NA NA 0 1 Subtotal within Area Plan 3,215 4,340 5,470 179 907

Lakeview/Nuevo Area Plan

SU1 – San Jacinto River, Middle Reach 2,605 3,315 4,025 229 818 SU2 – Lakeview Mountains West 4,045 5,130 6,210 0 239 Not within a Subunit NA NA NA 0 0 Subtotal within Area Plan 6,650 8,445 10,235 229 1057

Mead Valley Area Plan SU1 – Motte/Rimrock 315 455 590 0 0 SU2 – Gavilan Hills East 485 750 1,015 15 33 SU3 – Good Hope East 290 390 495 0 10 SU4 – San Jacinto River Lower 795 1,165 1,535 0 147 Not within a Subunit NA NA NA 0 0

Subtotal within Area Plan 1,885 2,760 3,635 15 190

The Pass Area Plan SU1 – Potrero/Badlands 5,570 7,420 9,275 0 8,164 SU2 – Badlands/San Bernardino National Forest

1,105 1,650 2,195 0 1,017

SU3 – San Timoteo Creek 1,865 2,160 2,455 0 903 Not within a Subunit NA NA NA 0 425

262

APPENDIX A






2020)*



2020)* Subtotal within Area Plan 8,540 11,230 13,925 0 10,509

Reche Canyon/Badlands Area Plan SU1 – Box Springs East 175 265 350 0 703 SU2 – Reche Canyon 1,215 1,915 2,615 0 99 SU3 – Badlands North 8,270 9,580 10,895 0 3,440 SU4 – San Jacinto Wildlife Area/Mystic Lake

860 1,305 1,750 0 1,950

Not within a Subunit NA NA NA 0 358 Subtotal within Area Plan 10,520 13,065 15,610 0 6,549 REMAP (Riverside Extended Mountain Area Plan) SU1 – Cactus Valley 6,020 6,805 7,590 0 4,512 SU2 – Wilson Valley/Sage 26,205 30,815 35,425 0 11,004 SU3 – Temecula and Cottonwood Creeks

1,480 2,115 2,745 0 349

SU4 – Tule Creek/Anza Valley 6,415 8,515 10,615 0 3,452 SU5 – Upper San Jacinto River 750 985 1,220 0 0 SU6 – Tripp Flats 520 680 840 0 0 SU7 – Southern Badlands East 10 20 35 0 0 Not within a Subunit NA NA NA 0 859 Subtotal within Area Plan 41,400 49,935 58,470 0 20,176

San Jacinto Valley Area Plan

SU1 – Gilman Springs 3,540 5,030 6,520 0 2,534 SU2 – Lakeview Mountains East 1,305 1,730 2,150 196 1,470 SU3 – Upper San Jacinto River/Bautista Creek

2,085 2,980 3,875 0 1,937

SU4 – Hemet Vernal Pool Areas East 940 1,190 1,445 0 163 SU5 – Mica Butte 3,670 4,570 5,475 0 1,342 Not within a Subunit NA NA NA 0 241 Subtotal within Area Plan 11,540 15,500 19,465 196 7,687

Sun City/Menifee Valley Area Plan

263

APPENDIX A






2020)*



2020)* SU1 – Warm Springs Creek/French Valley Area

395 480 565 0 338

SU2 – Lower Sedco Hills 725 875 1,020 0 190 Not within a Subunit NA NA NA 0 0 Subtotal within Area Plan 1,120 1,355 1,585 0 528

Southwest Area Plan SU1 – Murrieta Creek 640 1,055 1,465 0 71 SU2 – Temecula and Pechanga Creeks 365 600 840 3 29 SU3 – Vail Lake 10,065 11,500 12,930 0 273 SU4 – Cactus Valley/SWRC-MSR/Johnson Ranch

4,395 6,180 7,970 0 851

SU5 – French Valley/Lower Sedco Hills 4,360 5,880 7,395 32 2,509 SU6 – Santa Rosa Plateau 1,285 2,100 2,915 19 527 SU7 – Tenaja Corridor 1,390 2,115 2,845 81 635 Not within a Subunit NA NA NA 0 1,121 Subtotal within Area Plan 22,500 29,430 36,360 135 6,016

Temescal Canyon Area Plan

SU1 – Santa Ana River/Santa Ana Mountains

250 400 550 0 139

SU2 – Prado Basin 200 300 395 0 0 SU3 – Temescal Wash West 2,790 3,600 4,415 0 620 SU4 – La Sierra Hills/Lake Mathews West

210 285 355 0 0

SU5 – Temescal/Santa Ana Mountains 35 60 85 0 78 Not within a Subunit NA NA NA 0 561 Subtotal within Area Plan 3,485 4,645 5,800 0 1,398

Cities of Riverside and Norco Area Plan

SU1 – Santa Ana River South 75 140 200 0 34 SU2 – Sycamore Canyon West 15 25 40 0 0 Not within a Subunit NA NA NA 43 43

264

APPENDIX A






2020)*



2020)* Subtotal within Area Plan 90 165 240 43 0

Not within a Subunit NA NA NA 0 0 Subtotal within Area Plan 90 165 240 0 77

Grand Totals*** 124,455 158,605 192,750 981 62,798*

* The total includes acreage adjustments for planned roadways, the Potrero MARB SKR acquisition of 2,540 acres, and acquisitions outside of

Criteria Cells. Acquisitions made prior to Plan approval are also included. Totals may not add up due to rounding.

** Low, midpoint, and high conservation goals are taken directly from Table 3-2 of the MSHCP (Volume 1).

*** * All numbers have been rounded to the nearest integer. As a result, sum of columns may deviate from total.

6. Contact Information

Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority Riverside Centre Building 4080 Lemon St 3rd Floor Riverside, CA 92501 Phone: (951) 955-9700 Philip Kang Technical Information Programs Manager Phone: (951) 955-3792 Email: [email protected]

265

mailto:[email protected]

APPENDIX B

Western Riverside County MSHCP Annual Report (January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020) B-1

SECTION 8.0 APPENDIX B

Tables

266

APPENDIX B


TABLE B-1 Access Agreements for 2020 Surveys

Landowner Property/Reserve Name

Bureau of Land Management BLM land designated as PQP in MSHCP Plan Area

California Department of Fish and Wildlife Estelle Mountain Ecological Reserve, French Valley Wildlife Area, Hidden Valley Wildlife Area, San Jacinto

Wildlife Area (Davis and Potrero Units), Santa Rosa Plateau Ecological Reserve/Tenaja

California Department of Parks and Recreation Lake Perris State Recreation Area, Chino Hills State Park, San Timoteo Canyon, Upland Game Hunting Unit at Lake

Perris State Recreation Area

Center for Natural Lands Management Johnson Ranch, Skunk Hollow, Wilson Valley, Summerhill, Sunland Donation

City of Banning Assessor Parcel Number (APN) 531-060-059, 531-090-013, 531-090-014, 531-090-018, 531-100-008, 531-100-009, 531-100-010, 531-110-005, 531-110-011, 531-110-012, 531-280-006, 531-290-002, 531-290-026 and 531-310-006

City of Lake Elsinore APN 363-020-017, 371-040-022, 371-050-001, 371-050-007, 373-320-010, 373-320-011, 381-020-006, and portions of 373-310-006, 373-310-007, 373-310-011, 373-320-006, 373-320-007, 373-320-014

City of Murrieta APN 906-383-002

City of Norco APN 153-020-009

City of Riverside APN 179-310-002, 187-020-005, 187-130-003, 207-070-001, 238-220-001, 252-230-006, 253-270-009, 256-440-014, 263-050-006, 263-320-002, 272-030-001, 272-040-010, 179-310-003, 187-020-006, 187-130-004, 207-070-005, 252-230-001, 252-230-008, 253-270-010, 256-440-018, 263-050-057, 263-320-003, 272-030-002, 272-040-011, 179-340-003, 187-080-015, 207-050-001, 207-190-006, 252-230-002, 253-260-017, 253-270-041, 256-440-019, 263-240-020, 263-360-048, 272-030-003, 179-340-004, 187-090-011, 207-050-002, 207-190-007, 252-230-003, 253-270-006, 253-270-043, 257-140-002, 263-300-031, 263-360-049, 272-030-004, 186-270-008, 187-130-001, 207-060-012, 238-190-001, 252-230-005, 253-270-007, 256-440-013, 263-050-005, 263-310-001, 272-020-

004, 272-040-001, Sycamore Canyon City of Temecula APN 961-450-011, 961-450-015, 961-450-064

Metropolitan Water District Lake Mathews, Southwestern Riverside County Multi-Species Reserve

267

APPENDIX B


Landowner Property/Reserve Name

Orange County Water District APN 101-020-003, 101-110-001, 101-060-002, 101-100-001, 121-040-001, 121-030-007

Regional Conservation Authority All RCA-owned lands

Riverside County County-owned conservation lands in MSHCP Plan Area classified as ARL or PQP

Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District

APN 178-050-031, 178-050-045, locations along Temecula Creek, and southeast of Collier Marsh

Riverside County Habitat Conservation Agency Estelle Mountain, SKR Core Reserve

Riverside County Regional Parks & Open Space District

County Parks & Open Space Land classified as ARL or PQP

Riverside County Transportation Department APN 392-340-038

Silverado Ranch – Phase 1 APN 579-400-006-1, 579-020-002-3, 579-020-003-4, 579-020-004-5, 579-020-005-6, 579-020-006-7

U.S. Army Corp of Engineers Prado Dam (APN 101-020-004, 130-050-002)

U.S. Forest Service San Bernardino National Forest, Cleveland National Forest classified as PQP

268

TABLE B - 2 Details of Covered Species Monitoring


Common Name Latin Name Species Objective Evaluated by the Monitoring Program* Freq. 2004-2019† 2020†

Objective Currently

Met? ‡

Arroyo Toad Bufo californicus

Objective 6: Maintain breeding populations at a minimum of 80% of the conserved breeding locations as measured by the presence/absence of juvenile toads, tadpoles, or egg masses across any 1 to 5 consecutive

years.

Note: Breeding detected in 4 of 9 Core Areas (44%). Metamorphosis observed in 2 of those Core Areas during focused surveys in 2017.

Nocturnal Survey in April 2019 failed to detect species.

5 F / D N / N NO

California Red-legged Frog Rana draytonii

Objective 6: Determine if successful reproduction is occurring as measured by the presence/absence of tadpoles, egg masses, or juvenile

frogs at least every 8 years (Cook et. al. 2012).

Note: All reasonably accessible habitat had been surveyed in 2009. Species is most likely extirpated.

8 F / N N / N NO

Coast Range Newt

Taricha tarosa tarosa

Objective 5: Maintain occupancy of at least 75% of occupied habitat and determine if successful reproduction is occurring within the MSHCP

Conservation Area as measured by the presence/absence of larvae or egg masses at least every 8 years (Cook et. al. 2012).

Note: Focused surveys were conducted in 2020 at all known, accessible sites in the Santa Rosa Plateau and the Santa Ana Mountains. Breeding

incidentally detected within both Core Areas.

8 F / D F / D YES

Mountain Yellow- legged Frog Rana muscosa

Objective 6: Maintain successful reproduction as measured by the presence/absence of tadpoles, egg masses, or juvenile frogs at least

every 8 years (Cook et. al. 2012).

Note: Surveys done by USGS.

8 F / D F / D (by USGS) YES

* Only objectives evaluated by the Biological Monitoring Program are included. Objectives have been shortened to fit in the table; for full text, see the Species Accounts in Volume 2 of the MSHCP. † Survey Type/Detection Type: F / D = focused survey, species detected; F / N = focused survey, species not detected; F / I = focused survey, species not detected during survey but detected

incidentally; N / I = no focused survey but detected incidentally; N / N = no focused survey and not detected; N / D = no focused survey by the Monitoring Program but species detected during focused survey by agency reported in parentheses.

‡ YES = objective(s) met; NO = objective(s) not met; Partial = some but not all objectives met. § See Volume 1, Section 5, Table 5-8 of the MSHCP

269




Objective Currently

Met? ‡

Western Spadefoot

Scaphiopus hammondii

Objective 4: Maintain successful reproduction at a minimum of 75% of the conserved breeding locations as measured by the presence/absence of

tadpoles, egg masses, or juvenile toads no less than every 8 years.

Note: Detected occupancy in 3 of 6 Core Areas (50%), Reproduction detected in 11 of 15 Core Areas (73%).

8 F / D N/ I NO

Belding’s Orange- throated Whiptail

Cnemidophorus hyperythrus

beldingi

Default monitoring objective§: Monitor the distribution of this species at least once every 8 years. Maintain species presence and continued use

at 75% of Core Areas.

Note: Detected in 7 of 9 Core Areas (78%).

8 F / D F / I YES

Coastal Western Whiptail

Cnemidophorus tigris

multiscutatus


at 75% of identified Core Areas.

Note: Detected in 100% of Core Areas.

8 F / D F / D YES

Granite Night Lizard

Xantusia henshawi henshawi



Note: Detected in 6 of 9 Core Areas (67%). Core Areas

8 F / D F / I NO

Granite Spiny Lizard Sceloporus orcutti

Default monitoring objective§: Monitor the distribution of this species at least once every 8 years. Maintain species presence and continued use at

75% of identified Core Areas.

Note: Detected in 12 of 13 Core Areas (92%). No habitat in Banning Bench.

8 F / D N / I YES




270




Objective Currently

Met? ‡

Northern Red diamond

Rattlesnake Crotalus ruber

ruber


at 75% of identified areas.


8 F / D F / I YES

San Bernardino Mountain

Kingsnake Lampropeltis

zonata parvirubra



Note: Objective should be met with additional surveys to reconfirm expired occurrence. Detected in 1 of 2 Core Areas (50%) in 2017.

8 F / D F / N NO

San Diego Banded Gecko

Coleonyx variegatus

abbottii



Note: Detected in 5 of 7 Core Areas (71%). New survey methods need to be tested.

8 F / D F / N NO

San Diego Horned Lizard

Phrynosoma coronatum blainvillei




8 F / D F / I YES




271




Objective Currently

Met? ‡

San Diego Mountain


zonata pulchra



Note: Detected in 1 of 3 Core Areas (33%). Species not found to date in Agua Tibia or Desert Transition Cores. Desert Transition Core does not

have appropriate habitat.

8 F / D F / N NO

Southern Rubber Boa

Charina bottae umbratica



Note: Incidentally detected in 2013 and 2017 in its one Core Area (100%).

8 F / I N / N YES

Southern Sagebrush Lizard

Sceloporus graciosus

vandenburgianus

Monitor the distribution of this species at least once every 8 years. Maintain species presence and continued use at 75% of Core Areas.

Note: Detected in 1 of 2 Core Areas and 1 non-Core Area. Habitat lacking

in Santa Rosa Core Area. Incidentally detected in 2016.

8 F / D N / I NO

Western (Southwestern)

Pond Turtle Clemmys

marmorata pallida

Objective 5: Maintain continued use at a minimum of 75% of the conserved Core Areas as measured once every 3 years.

Note: Detected in 4 of 8 Core Areas (50%). Incidentally found in 2 non-

core locations.

3 F / D N / I NO

American Bittern Botaurus lentiginosus

Objective 4: Maintain (once every 8 years) the continued use of 50% of the Core Areas. 8 F / I F / I YES

Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus

Monitor distribution at least once every 8 years. Maintain species presence and continued use at 75% of identified locations. 8 F / D N / I YES



‡ YES = objective(s) met; NO = objective(s) not met; Partial = some but not all objectives met. § See Volume 1, Section 5, Table 5-8 of the MSHCP.

272




Objective Currently

Met? ‡

Bell's (Sage) Sparrow

Amphispiza belli belli


at 75% of identified locations. 8 F / D N / I YES

Black Swift Cypseloides niger


at 75% of identified locations. Objective based on landscape level habitat conservation on US Forest Service Lands.

Note: The Plan does not have monitoring-specific objectives. Surveys in 2012 resulted in no observations; only 1 known breeding area in the Plan

and species no longer found there.

8 F / I N / N NO

Black-crowned Night Heron

Nycticorax nycticorax


at 75% of identified locations.


8 N / I N / I YES

Burrowing Owl Athene

cunicularia hypugaea

Objective 2: Include within the MSHCP Conservation Area at least 5 Core Areas and interconnecting linkages. Core Areas may include the

following: (1) Lake Skinner/Diamond Valley Lake area; (2) playa west of Hemet; (3) San Jacinto Wildlife Area/Mystic Lake area including Lake Perris area; (4) Lake Mathews and (5) along the Santa Ana River; The

Core Areas should support a combined total breeding population of approximately 120 burrowing owls with no fewer than 5 pairs in any 1

Core Area.

Note: Burrowing Owl surveys show breeding population and pairs are below the requirements.

8 F / D F / D NO




273




Objective Currently

Met? ‡

Cactus Wren Campylorhynchus brunneicapillus



Note: Species only present in south-eastern portion of Plan Area.

8 F / D N / I NO

California Horned Lark

Eremophila alpestris actia




8 F / D N / I YES

California Spotted Owl

Strix occidentalis occidentalis



Note: Species detected in only 1 of 3 Bioregions.

8 F / D N / N NO

Coastal California Gnatcatcher

Polioptila californica californica

Objective 3: Maintain (once every 3 years) continued use of, and successful reproduction at 75% of the Core Areas.

Note: Detected and successfully reproducing in 100% of Core Areas.

3 F / D F / D YES

Cooper's Hawk Accipiter cooperii




8 F / D N / I YES




274




Objective Currently

Met? ‡

Double-crested Cormorant

Phalacrocorax auritus


at 75% of identified locations. 8 F / D N / I YES

Downy Woodpecker

Picoides pubescens



Note: Species found in 3 of 5 (60%) Core Areas

8 F / D N / I NO

Ferruginous Hawk Buteo regalis




8 F / D F / D YES

Golden Eagle Aquila chrysaetos

Objective 3: Maintain (once every 8 years) the continued use of and successful reproduction at 75% of the known nesting localities.

Note: Species detected near only half of the historic nesting locations. No

nests detected within one mile of the historic nesting locations.

8 F / D N / I NO




275




Objective Currently

Met? ‡

Grasshopper Sparrow

Ammodramus savannarum

Objective 2: Maintain occupancy within 3 large Core Areas (100%) and at least 3 of the 4 smaller Core Areas (75%) in at least 1 year out of any 5-consecutive-year period. In order for this species to become a Covered

Species Adequately Conserved, the following Conservation must be demonstrated: Include within the Conservation Area at least 8,000 acres

in 7 potential Core Areas. Core Areas may include the following: (1) Prado Basin, (2) Lake Skinner/Diamond Valley Lake/Johnson Ranch

area, (3) Lake Mathews-Estelle Mountain, (4) Badlands, (5) Box Springs, (6) Santa Rosa Plateau/Tenaja, (7) Kabian Park, (8) Steele Peak, (9) Sycamore Canyon, (10) Potrero, and (11) Mystic Lake/San Jacinto

Wildlife Area. Three of the 7 Core Areas will be large, consisting of a minimum of 2,000 acres of grassland habitat or grassland-dominated

habitat. The other 4 Core Areas may be smaller but will consist of at least 500 acres of contiguous grassland habitat or grassland-dominated

habitat. Five of the 7 Core Areas will be demonstrated to support at least 20 grasshopper sparrow pairs with evidence of successful reproduction

within the first 5 years after permit. Covered Species not adequately conserved until Objective 2 is met.

Note: Occupancy of the large Core Areas has been confirmed, but not for the small Core Areas. The reproduction portion of the objective has not

been met.

1 to 5 F / D N / I Partial

Great Blue Heron Ardea herodias




8 N / I N / I YES




276




Objective Currently

Met? ‡

Least Bell's Vireo Vireo bellii pusillus

Objective 4: Maintain (once every 3 years) the continued use of and successful reproduction at 75% of the known vireo-occupied habitat.

Note: Species found in 6 of 8 (75%) Core Areas but only successfully

reproducing in 5 (62.5%)

3 F / D F / D Partial

Lincoln's Sparrow Melospiza lincolnii

Objective 3: Maintain occupancy within 3 large Core Areas (100%) in at least 1 year out of any 5-consecutive-year period. In order for this species

to become a Covered Species Adequately Conserved, the following conservation must be demonstrated: Include within the MSHCP

Conservation Area at least 100 acres in 3 Core Areas. Core Areas may include the following: (1) Tahquitz Valley; (2) Round Valley; (3) Garner Valley. The 3 Core Areas will be large, consisting of a minimum of 50

acres of montane meadow, wet montane meadow, and edges of montane riparian or riparian scrub. The Core Areas will be demonstrated to support at least 20 Lincoln sparrow pairs with evidence of successful

reproduction within the first 5 years after permit issuance. Covered Species not adequately conserved until Objective 3 is met.

Note: Species not detected during focused surveys in 2008. Two of the

suggested Core Areas are outside of the Plan Area. Reproduction portion of the objective possibly will not be met because suitable breeding habitat is difficult to locate in the Plan Area, and species is rarely present

during the breeding season.

1 to 5 F / I N / I NO

Loggerhead Shrike

Lanius ludovicianus

Objective 3: Maintain (once every 8 years) the continued use of, and successful reproduction within, 75% of the Core Areas.

Note: The occupancy portion of the objective has been met; the

reproduction portion of the objective has not been met.

8 F / D N / I Partial




277




Objective Currently

Met? ‡

MacGillivray’s Warbler Oporornis tolmiei


at 75% of known locations. 8 F / D N / I YES

Merlin Falco columbarius


at 75% of known locations. 8 F / D F / D YES

Mountain Plover Charadrius montanus


at 75% of known locations.

Note: Species not detected in any Core Areas in 2019. Species detected in one Core Area during focused surveys in 2012

8 F / D F / N NO

Mountain Quail Oreortyx pictus




8 N / I N / I YES

Nashville Warbler Vermivora ruficapilla



Note: Species is uncommonly detected as a spring and fall migrant and is unlikely to breed within the Plan Area.

8 F / I N / I NO




278




Objective Currently

Met? ‡

Northern Goshawk Accipiter gentilis

Objective 3: Maintain (once every 3 years) the continued use of and successful reproduction at a minimum of 75% of the known nesting

localities.

Note: Species was not detected during focused surveys in 2013.

3 F / I N / N NO

Northern Harrier Circus cyaneus

Objective 5: Maintain (once every 5 years) the continued use of, and successful reproduction at, 75% of the known nesting areas.

Note: The occupancy portion of the objective has been met; the

reproduction portion of the objective has not been met.


Osprey Pandion haliaetus Default monitoring objective§: Monitor the distribution of this species at

least once every 8 years. Maintain species presence and continued use at 75% of known locations.

8 F / D N / I YES

Peregrine Falcon Falco peregrinus Default monitoring objective§: Monitor the distribution of this species at

least once every 8 years. Maintain species presence and continued use at 75% of identified locations.

8 F / D N / I YES

Prairie Falcon Falco mexicanus



8 F / D F / D YES




279




Objective Currently

Met? ‡

Purple Martin Progne subis



Note: Species was not detected in either Core Area during 2013 focused surveys. Continued use has not been observed. Surveys will be

conducted in 2021

8 F / I N / N NO

Sharp-shinned Hawk Accipiter striatus Default monitoring objective§: Monitor the distribution of this species at

least once every 8 years. 8 F / D N / I YES

Southern California Rufous-crowned Sparrow

Aimophila ruficeps

canescens




8 F / D N / I YES

Southwestern Willow Flycatcher

Empidonax traillii extimus

Objective 4: Maintain (once every three years) the continued use of, and successful reproduction at 75% of the known southwestern willow

flycatcher occupied Core Areas.

Note: Breeding records no longer exist in Prado Basin or elsewhere in the Plan area.

3 F / D N / I1 NO

Swainson’s Hawk Buteo swainsoni Default monitoring objective§: Monitor the distribution of this species at least once every 8 years. 8 F / D N / I YES




1 Incidental sightings of Empidonax traillii are likely not E. t. extimus.

280




Objective Currently

Met? ‡

Tree Swallow Tachycineta bicolor



Note: Species detected at 66.7% of Core Areas.

8 F / D N / I NO

Tricolored Blackbird Agelaius tricolor Objective 4: Maintain (once every 5 years) the continued use of, and

successful reproduction within at least 1 of the identified Core Areas. 5 F / D N / I YES

Turkey Vulture Cathartes aura

Objective 4: Maintain (once every 3 years) the continued use of, and successful reproduction at the 2 known nesting locations and at nesting

locations identified in the MSHCP Conservation Area in the future.

Note: The objective for occupancy has been met, but not for reproduction.


Western Yellow-billed Cuckoo

Coccyzus americanus occidentalis

Objective 5: Maintain (once every 3 years) the continued use of, and successful reproduction at 75% of the known western yellow-billed

cuckoo occupied Core Areas.

Note: Surveys performed by Orange County Water District (OCWD) led to conclusion of objectives not met and not likely to change in the near

future.

3 F / D (by

OCWD) N / N NO

White-faced Ibis Plegadis chihi

Monitor the distribution of this species at least once every 8 years. Maintain species presence and continued use at 75% of identified

locations.

Note: Species detected at 100% of Core Areas.

8 N / I N / I YES




281




Objective Currently

Met? ‡

White-tailed Kite Elanus leucurus

Objective 5: Maintain (once every 3 years) the continued use of, and successful reproduction at 75% of the core breeding areas.

Note: Species detected in 6 (60%) of Core Areas and successfully nested

in 2 (20%)

3 F / D F / D NO

Williamson's Sapsucker

Sphyrapicus thyroideus


at both identified Bioregions.

Note: Species detected in 1 (50%) Bioregion/identified location

8 F / D N / I NO

Wilson's Warbler Wilsonia pusilla Default monitoring objective§: Monitor the distribution of this species at


8 F / D N / I YES

Yellow Warbler Dendroica petechia brewsteri

Objective 3: Maintain (once every 5 years) the continued use of, and successful reproduction at 75% of the Core Areas.

Note: The objective for occupancy has been met, but not for reproduction.


Yellow-breasted Chat Icteria virens Objective 3: Maintain (once every 5 years) the continued use of, and

successful reproduction at 75% of the Core Areas. 5 F / D N / I YES

Arroyo Chub Gila orcutti



Note: Species detected in 2 of 7 Core Areas and 1 non-Core Area. Santa Ana River surveyed by outside agencies with Monitoring Program

assistance.

8 F / D N / N NO




282




Objective Currently

Met? ‡

Santa Ana Sucker

Catastomus santaanae


at 75% of identified Core Areas. 8

N / D (Upper SAR HCP,

OCWD, RCRCD)

N / N YES

Riverside Fairy Shrimp

Streptocephalus woottoni



Note: Species detected in only 2 of 5 Core Areas during current reporting period. Alberhill Core Area has no historic or recent records of detection.

Core Areas may need to be adjusted.

8 F / D N / N NO

Santa Rosa Plateau Fairy

Shrimp Linderiella santarosae


75% of identified locations.

Note: Species detected in its only Core Area (100%).

8 F / D N/ N YES

Vernal Pool Fairy Shrimp

Branchinecta lynchi



Note: Additional properties need to be acquired in Core Areas. Additional habitat needed in West Hemet (Salt Creek).

8 F / D N / N NO




283




Objective Currently

Met? ‡

Delhi Sands Flower- loving Fly

Rhaphiomidas terminatus

abdominalis

Objective 2: Reserve Managers shall document successful reproduction at all 3 Core Areas.

Note: Species detected in only 1 of 3 Core Areas in conservation.

Objective is being met at that conserved Core Area.

1 F / D F / D NO

Quino Checkerspot

Euphydryas editha quino

Objective 4: Reserve Managers will document the distribution of Quino checkerspot on an annual basis. 1 F / D F / D YES

Aguanga Kangaroo Rat

Dipodomys merriami collinus

Objective 3: Within the 5,484 acres of occupied or suitable habitat in the MSHCP Conservation Area, ensure that at least 75% (4,113 acres) of the

total is occupied and that at least 20% of the occupied habitat (approximately 823 acres) supports a medium or higher population density (≥ 5 to 15 individuals per hectare) of the species as measured across any

8-year period.

Note: Neither distribution nor density objectives are currently being met. There are not enough occupied grids to determine density. A habitat

model is needed to determine whether 5,484 acres of suitable habitat is being conserved in the noted areas.

1 to 8 F / D N / I NO

Bobcat Lynx rufus

Objective 3: Maintain or improve functionality of dispersal routes. Existing undercrossings in key areas will be evaluated for their adequacy and

improved as necessary to convey bobcats. Maintain species presence and continued use at 75% of identified locations.

8 F / D N / I YES




284




Objective Currently

Met? ‡

Brush Rabbit Sylvilagus bachmani



Note: Trapping is currently the best method but is very labor intensive. Species Objectives not likely to be met with only incidental detections.

8 F / D N / I NO

Coyote Canis latrans Default monitoring objective§: Monitor the distribution of this species at

least once every 8 years. Maintain species presence and continued use at 75% of identified Core Areas.

8 F / D N / I YES

Dulzura Kangaroo Rat

Dipodomys simulans



Note: In 2020, 9/14 (64%) Core Areas were occupied.

8 F / D N / I NO

Long- tailed Weasel Mustela frenata

Objective 3: Maintain (measured once every 8 years) the continued use of long- tailed weasel at a minimum of 75% of the localities where the

species has been known to occur.

Note: Started focused surveys on MUFR in 2018 and will continue, adapting survey methods as needed.

8 F / D F / D NO

Los Angeles Pocket Mouse

Perognathus longimembris

brevinasus

Objective 4: Reserve Managers shall demonstrate that each of the 7 Core Areas supports a stable or increasing population that occupies at least

30% of the suitable habitat (at least 4,200 acres) as measured over any 8- consecutive-year period.

Note: Species currently only occupies 4 of 7 Core Areas as of 2012.

1 to 8 F / D F / D NO




285




Objective Currently

Met? ‡

Mountain Lion Puma concolor

Objective 3: Maintain or improve functionality of dispersal routes. Existing undercrossings in key areas will be evaluated for their adequacy to convey

mountain lions. Maintain species presence and continued use at 75% of identified locations.

Note: Linkage monitoring is ongoing.

8 F / D N / I NO

Northwestern San Diego

Pocket Mouse Chaetodipus fallax fallax



Note: In 2020, 11/16 (69%) Core Areas were occupied. Species objectives have not been met since 2017.

8 F / D N / I NO

San Bernardino Flying Squirrel

Glaucomys sabrinus

californicus

Objective 2: Confirm occupation of 1,000 ha (2,470 acres) with a mean density of at least 2 individuals per hectare (2 individuals per 2.47 acres) in

the San Jacinto Mountains; in the San Bernardino Mountains, confirm occupation of 100 ha. Covered Species not adequately conserved until the

above objective is met.

Note: USFS and SDNHM staff have determined it is extremely unlikely that the objective has been met. Focused surveys have not been conducted because of the assumed inefficient use of resources.

8 N / N N / N NO




286




Objective Currently

Met? ‡

San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat

Dipodomys merriami parvus

Objective 3: Within the 4,440 acres of suitable habitat in the MSHCP Conservation Area, ensure that at least 75% of the total (3,330 acres) is

occupied and that at least 20% of the occupied habitat (approximately 666 acres) supports a medium or higher population density (≥ 5 to 15

individuals per hectare) of the species as measured across any 8-year period.

Note: Neither distribution nor density objectives have been met.

1 to 8 F / D N / I NO

San Diego Black- tailed Jackrabbit

Lepus californicus bennettii



Note: Objectives met with incidentals.

8 F / D N / I YES

San Diego Desert Woodrat

Neotoma lepida intermedia



Note: Species objectives can be met with other small mammal target trapping and a small amount of additional target trapping.

8 F / D N / I NO

Stephens' Kangaroo Rat

Dipodomys stephensi

Objective 3: Within the minimum 15,000 acres of occupied habitat in the MSHCP Conservation Area, maintain at least 30% of the occupied habitat (approximately 4,500 acres) at a population density of medium or higher

(i.e., at least 5-10 individuals per hectare) across all Core Areas. No single Core Area will account for more than 30% of the total medium (or higher)

population density area.

Note: Management or additional conservation lands are required.

1 to 8 F / D N / I NO




287




Objective Currently

Met? ‡

Beautiful Hulsea Hulsea vestita ssp. callicarpha

Objective 2: Include within the MSHCP Conservation Area at least 12 of the known occurrences at Lake Fulmor, Pine Cove, Idyllwild, Mountain Center, Pine Meadow and Lake Hemet. Confirm 16 localities (locality in this sense is not smaller than 1 quarter section) with no fewer than 50

individuals each (unless a smaller population has been demonstrated to be self-sustaining). Covered Species not adequately conserved until the


8 F / D F / D YES

Brand’s Phacelia Phacelia stellaris

Objective 2: Include within the MSHCP Conservation Area at least the two known localities of this species along the Santa Ana River at Fairmont

Park and in the Santa Ana Wilderness Area. Monitor the distribution of this species at least once every 8 years. Maintain species presence and

continued use at 75% of identified locations.

Note: Unable to meet Objective 2 as written because a required occurrence has been extirpated.

8 F / D F / D NO

California Beardtongue

Penstemon californicus

Objective 2: Include within the MSHCP Conservation Area at least 15 occurrences in Aguanga, Blackburn Canyon and the San Jacinto

Mountains (including Garner Valley, Pyramid Peak, and Kenworthy Ranger Station). Monitor the distribution of this species at least once every 8 years. Maintain species presence and continued use at 75% of identified

locations.

Note: Unable to meet Objective 2 as written. Objective includes duplicate records and locations in inappropriate habitat (possible errors in geo-

referencing). Revision of objectives is needed.

8 F / D F / D NO




288




Objective Currently

Met? ‡

California Bedstraw

Galium californicum ssp.

primum

Objective 2: Include within the MSHCP Conservation Area at least four of the known occurrences of this species in the vicinity of Alvin Meadows between Pine Cove and Idyllwild in the San Jacinto Mountains. Monitor

the distribution of this species at least once every 8 years. Maintain species presence and continued use at 75% of identified locations.

Note: Species was surveyed in 2020 and potentially found in 2/4 (50%) occurrence areas but could not be positively identified due to a lack of

flowers.

8 F / D F / D NO

California Black Walnut

Juglans californica var.

californica

Objective 2: Include within the MSHCP Conservation Area at least seven known occurrences of this species within the Santa Ana Mountains, at

Lake Skinner, at the Santa Rosa Plateau and one east of Pedley. Monitor the distribution of this species at least once every 8 years. Maintain species presence and continued use at 75% of identified locations.

Note: Unable to meet Objective 2 as written. Required locations in

historical record differ significantly from occurrences observed. Revision of objectives is needed. Surveys are ongoing.

8 F / D N / N NO

California Muhly Muhlenbergia californica

Objective 2: Include within the MSHCP Conservation Area the known locations at Sage, Aguanga, Estelle Mountain, Prado Dam, Temescal

Canyon, and Sitton Peak. Confirm 10 localities (locality in this sense is not smaller than 1 quarter section) containing at least 50 clumps (unless a

smaller population has been demonstrated to be self-sustaining). Covered Species not adequately conserved until the above objective is met.

Note: Unable to meet Objective 2 and Objective 3 because species does not occur within the Plan Area. No historical records could be found within

Plan Area. Revision of objectives is needed.

8 F / N N / N NO




289




Objective Currently

Met? ‡

California Orcutt Grass

Orcuttia californica

Objective 2: Include within the MSHCP Conservation Area at least three of the known locations of California Orcutt grass at the Santa Rosa Plateau,

at Skunk Hollow and in the upper Salt Creek drainage west of Hemet. Monitor the distribution of this species at least once every 8 years. Maintain species presence and continued use at 75% of identified

locations.

Note: Unable to meet Objective 2 at this time because it includes a location not within the Conservation Area.

8 F / D N / N NO

Chickweed Oxytheca

Oxytheca caryophylloides

Objective 2: Include within the MSHCP Conservation Area at least five of the known locations within the San Jacinto Mountains.

Objective 3: Confirm 10 localities (locality in this sense is not smaller than 1 quarter section) managed with 1,000 individuals each (unless a smaller

population has been demonstrated to be self-sustaining). Covered Species not adequately conserved until the above objective is met.

Note: Objective 2 has been met. Surveys for Objective 3 are ongoing to

meet the minimum population size requirement.

8 F / D F / D NO

Cleveland's Bush Monkeyflower

Mimulus clevelandii

Objective 2: Include within the MSHCP Conservation Area the two known localities of this species on Santiago Peak in the Santa Ana Mountains and on the northern slopes of the Agua Tibia Mountains. Monitor the

distribution of this species at least once every 8 years. Maintain species presence and continued use at 75% of identified locations.

Note: Objective 2 met through incidental observations.

8 F / D N / N YES




290




Objective Currently

Met? ‡

Cliff Cinquefoil Potentilla rimicola

Objective 2: Include within the MSHCP Conservation Area the two known localities of this species in Dark Canyon and near Deer Spring.

Objective 3: Confirm 5 localities (locality in this sense is not smaller than 1 quarter section). Covered Species not adequately conserved until the


Note: Unable to meet Objectives 2 and 3 as written. Objectives include a duplicate record and species occurs mostly outside of the Plan Area.

Revision of objectives is needed.

8 F / D N / N NO

Coulter's Goldfields

Lasthenia glabrata ssp.

coulteri

Objective 2: Include within the MSHCP Conservation Area at least 20 of the known occurrences of this species, including the three Core Areas: the

San Jacinto Wildlife Area and the southern shores of Mystic Lake, the middle segment of the San Jacinto River and a portion of the Alberhill

locality. Monitor the distribution of this species at least once every 8 years. Maintain species presence and continued use at 75% of identified

locations.

Note: Unable to meet Objective 2 at this time. Objective includes locations that are not within the Conservation Area and duplicate records. Revision

of objectives needed.

8 F / D F / N NO

Coulter's Matilija Poppy Romneya coulteri

Objective 2: Confirm 30 localities (locality in this sense is not smaller than 1 quarter section). Covered Species not adequately conserved until the

above objective is met. 8 F / D N / N YES




291




Objective Currently

Met? ‡

Davidson's Saltscale

Atriplex serenana var. davidsonii

Objective 2: Include within the MSHCP Conservation Area the three known localities of Davidson’s saltscale at Salt Creek, the San Jacinto River and the San Jacinto Wildlife Area. Monitor the distribution of this species at least once every 8 years. Maintain species presence and


Note: Unable to meet Objective 2 at this time. Objective includes a location that is not within Conservation Area.

8 F / D N / I NO

Engelmann Oak Quercus engelmannii

Objective 2: Include within the MSHCP Conservation Area at least 33 known occurrences of this species, including the core locations at the

Santa Rosa Plateau and in the Santa Ana Mountains. Objective 3: Maintain recruitment at a minimum of 80% of the conserved populations as measured by the presence/absence of seedlings and/or

saplings across any consecutive 5 years.

Note: Recruitment surveys are ongoing.

5 F / D F / D NO

Fish's Milkwort Polygala cornuta var. fishiae

Objective 2: Include within the MSHCP Conservation Area at least three of the known localities (Santa Rosa Plateau, Santa Margarita Ecological

Preserve, and San Mateo Canyon). Objective 3: Confirm 10 localities (locality in this sense is not smaller than

1 quarter section) with at least 50 individuals (ramets or genets) each (unless a smaller population has been demonstrated to be self-sustaining).

Covered Species not adequately conserved until the above objective is met.

8 F / D N / I YES




292




Objective Currently

Met? ‡

Graceful Tarplant Holocarpha virgata ssp.

elongata

Objective 2: Include within the MSHCP Conservation Area at least eight of the known locations, including four occurrences located on Santa Rosa

Plateau and four occurrences in the San Mateo Canyon Wilderness Area. Objective 3: Confirm 10 localities (locality in this sense is not smaller than 1 quarter section) with 1,000 individuals each (unless a smaller population

has been demonstrated to be self-sustaining). Covered Species not adequately conserved until the above objective is met.

Note: Unable to meet Objective 2 as written. Objective includes locations

that cannot be found (poorly georeferenced historical records). Revision of objective is needed. Objective 3 has been met.


Hall's Monardella Monardella

macrantha ssp. hallii

Objective 2: Include within the MSHCP Conservation Area at least the five known locations of this species: Cahuilla Mountain and an occurrence

southwest of Pine Cove in the San Jacinto Mountains, two occurrences on the north slope of the Agua Tibia Mountains and Santiago Peak in the

Santa Ana Mountains. Monitor the distribution of this species at least once every 8 years. Maintain species presence and continued use at 75% of

identified locations.

Notes: Species was surveyed in 2020 but could not be positively identified due to a lack of flowers.

8 F / D F / N NO

Hamitt’s Clay-cress

Sibaropsis hammittii

Objective 2: Include within the MSHCP Conservation Area the Core Area for this species, including at least the one known locality near Elsinore Peak and suitable habitat adjacent to these occurrences. Monitor the


8 F / D N / N YES




293




Objective Currently

Met? ‡

Heart- leaved Pitcher Sage

Lepechinia cardiophylla

Objective 2: Include within the MSHCP Conservation Area at least six known populations in the Santa Ana Mountains (within the vicinity of Sierra

Peak, Indian Truck Trail, Bald Peak, Trabuco Peak, Horsethief Trail, Pleasants Peak, and the ridge between Ladd Canyon and East Fork Canyon). Monitor the distribution of this species at least once every 8

years. Maintain species presence and continued use at 75% of identified locations.

Note: Surveys for Objective 2 are ongoing to reconfirm expired

occurrences and meet monitoring interval requirement. Access restricted due to Holy Fire.

8 F / D F / N NO

Intermediate Mariposa Lily

Calochortus weedii var. intermedius

Objective 2: Include within the MSHCP Conservation Area at least two of the known localities (hills west of Crown Valley and Vail Lake) and

possibly a third locality (Sierra Peak area of the Santa Ana Mountains) of the species. Monitor the distribution of this species at least once every 8 years. Maintain species presence and continued use at 75% of identified

locations.

Note: Unable to meet Objective 2 at this time. Objective includes locations that are not within Conservation Area.

8 F / D N / I NO




294




Objective Currently

Met? ‡

Jaeger's Milk- vetch

Astragalus pachypus var.

jaegeri

Objective 2: Include within the MSHCP Conservation Area the seven known localities (18 occurrences) of this species at Aguanga Valley, San Jacinto Mountains, Potrero Creek, Sage, Temecula Canyon, and the core location at Vail Lake and the base of the Agua Tibia Mountains. Monitor


Note: Unable to meet Objective 2 as written. Objective includes many

duplicate records, very old records (1880-1941), and records that are not within the Conservation Area. Revision of Objective 2 is needed.

8 F / D N / N NO

Johnston's Rock Cress Arabis johnstonii

Objective 2: Include within the MSHCP Conservation Area the two Core Areas for this species, including at least 17 of the known occurrences in

Garner Valley and Mountain Springs and suitable habitat adjacent to these occurrences. Monitor the distribution of this species at least once every 8 years. Maintain species presence and continued use at 75% of identified

locations.

Note: Unable to meet Objective 2 as written. Objective includes duplicate records and locations that are not within Conservation Area. Revision of

Objective 2 is needed.

8 F / D N / N NO

Lemon Lily Lilium parryi

Objective 2: Include within the MSHCP Conservation Area at least six localities (seven occurrences) within the San Jacinto Mountains. Monitor


8 F / D N / I YES




295




Objective Currently

Met? ‡

Little Mousetail Myosurus minimus

Objective 2: Include within the MSHCP Conservation Area at least five of the known locations of this species, including Harford Springs County Park on the Gavilan Plateau and the three core locations: one along Salt Creek

west of Hemet and two on the Santa Rosa Plateau. Monitor the distribution of this species at least once every 8 years. Maintain species

presence and continued use at 75% of identified locations.

8 F / D F / N YES

Long- spined Spine Flower

Chorizanthe polygonoides var.

longispina

Objective 2: Include within the MSHCP Conservation Area at least 32 locations of this species, including the two core locations at Lake

Matthews and in the Agua Tibia Mountains. Monitor the distribution of this species at least once every 8 years. Maintain species presence and


8 F / D N / N YES

Many- stemmed Dudleya

Dudleya multicaulis

Objective 2: Include within the MSHCP Conservation Area at least 26 of the known occurrences of manystemmed dudleya, including the

occurrences at Estelle Mountain, Temescal Canyon, the Santa Ana Mountains, Gavilan Hills, Alberhill Creek, and Prado Basin. Monitor the distribution of this species at least once every 8 years. Maintain species


Note: Unable to meet Objective 2 as written. Objective includes duplicate records, locations that are not within Conservation Area, and locations that

cannot be found. Surveys are ongoing.

8 F / D N / N NO




296




Objective Currently

Met? ‡

Mojave Tarplant Deinandra mohavensis

Objective 2: Include within the MSHCP Conservation Area at least five of the known localities (represented by seven records) within the San Jacinto

Mountains and Foothills and northeast of Vail Lake. Objective 3: Include within the MSHCP Conservation Area at least 4 localities (locality in this sense is not smaller than 1 quarter section)

occupying at least 100 acres. Covered Species not adequately conserved until the above objective is met.

Note: Objective 2 has been met; additional interpretation of acreage

requirement necessary before Objective 3 can be met.


Mud Nama Nama stenocarpum

Objective 2: Include within the MSHCP Conservation Area two of the three known occurrences of this species along the San Jacinto River near

Gilman Springs Road. Monitor the distribution of this species at least once every 8 years. Maintain species presence and continued use at 75% of


Note: Unable to meet Objective 2 because species was not detected during monitoring surveys. Surveys are ongoing.

8 F / D F / D NO

Munz's Mariposa Lily

Calochortus palmeri var.

munzii

Objective 2: Include within the MSHCP Conservation Area 10 of the known locations within the San Jacinto Mountains, including Garner

Valley. Monitor the distribution of this species at least once every 8 years. Maintain species presence and continued use at 75% of identified

locations.

Note: Surveys for Objective 2 are ongoing to meet monitoring interval requirement.

8 F / D F / D NO




297




Objective Currently

Met? ‡

Munz's Onion Allium munzii

Objective 2: Include within the MSHCP Conservation Area at least 13 localities within Temescal Valley and the southwestern portion of Plan

Area, including the following Core Areas: Harford Springs Park, privately owned EO 5 population in Temescal Valley, Alberhill, DiPalma Rd, Estelle Mountain, Domenigoni Hills, Lake Skinner, Bachelor Mountain, Elsinore

Peak, Scott Road, North Peak, and northeast of Alberhill (EO 16). Monitor the distribution of this species at least once every 8 years. Maintain species presence and continued use at 75% of identified locations.

8 F / D N / N YES

Nevin's Barberry Berberis nevinii

Objective 2: Include within the MSHCP Conservation Area the known locations for Nevin’s barberry in the San Timoteo/Badlands area, Jurupa

Hills and Agua Tibia/Vail Lake area. Monitor the distribution of this species at least once every 8 years. Maintain species presence and continued use


Note: Unable to meet Objective 2 as written. Objective includes a location that is not within the Plan Area and another that is known to be extirpated.

Revision of objectives is needed.

8 F / D N / I NO

Ocellated Humboldt Lily

Lilium humboldtii ssp. Ocellatum

Objective 1: Include within the MSHCP Conservation Area at least four of the known locations at Arroyo Seco Canyon in the Agua Tibia Wilderness

Area and Fisherman’s Camp in Tenaja Canyon and the historic occurrences known from Castro Canyon, Horsethief Canyon, Elsinore Mountains; and Corona between Tin Mine Canyon and Santiago Peak,

Skyline Drive populations. Monitor the distribution of this species at least once every 8 years. Maintain species presence and continued use at 75%

of identified locations.

Note: Surveys for Objective 2 are ongoing to reconfirm expired occurrences and meet monitoring interval requirement.

8 F / D F / D NO




298




Objective Currently

Met? ‡

Orcutt's Brodiaea Brodiaea orcuttii

Objective 1: Include within the MSHCP Conservation Area one occurrence at Miller Mountain within the SanMateo Wilderness Area; a complex of about five occurrences on the Mesa de Burro, Mesa de Colorado, and Mesa de la Punta on the Santa Rosa Plateau within the Santa Rosa

Plateau Preserve; and one occurrence along the San Jacinto River.Monitor the distribution of this species at least once every 8 years.

Maintain species presence and continued use at 75% of identified locations.

Note: Unable to meet Objective 1 because species does not occur within

the Plan Area. Objective includes records for misidentified species (B. santarosae). Revision of objectives is needed.

8 F / N N / N NO

Palmer's Grapplinghook

Harpagonella palmeri

Objective 2: Include within the MSHCP Conservation Area at least 24 of the known occurrences of this species at Temescal Wash, Alberhill, Lake Elsinore, Antelope Valley, Bachelor Mountain, Vail Lake, Lake Mathews,

Harford Springs Park, Cleveland National Forest, Skunk Hollow, Lake Skinner and Vail Lake. Monitor the distribution of this species at least once

every 8 years. Maintain species presence and continued use at 75% of identified locations.

Note: Surveys were not conducted in 2020 due to staff shortages.

8 F / D N / I NO




299




Objective Currently

Met? ‡

Palomar Monkeyflower Mimulus diffusus

Objective 2: Include within the MSHCP Conservation Area at least 18 of the known locations on the Santa Rosa Plateau; in the vicinity of Sage; French Valley; east of Lake Skinner; and in the San Jacinto, Agua Tibia

and Santa Ana Mountains. Monitor the distribution of this species at least once every 8 years. Maintain species presence and continued use at 75%


Note: Unable to meet Objective 2 as written. Objective includes locations that cannot be found (no historical records) and locations that are not

within Conservation Area. Revision of objectives is needed.

8 F / D N / N NO

Parish's Brittlescale Atriplex parishii

Objective 2: Include within the MSHCP Conservation Area the three known populations of the Parish’s brittlescale in the upper Salt Creek

drainage west of Hemet. Monitor the distribution of this species at least once every 8 years. Maintain species presence and continued use at 75%


Note: Unable to meet Objective 2 because one or more required occurrences appear to be extirpated. Objective 2 includes locations that

are not within Conservation Area.

8 F / N N / N NO

Parish's Meadowfoam

Limnanthes gracilis var.

parishii

Objective 1: Include within the MSHCP Conservation Area at least one known location on the Santa Rosa Plateau. Monitor the distribution of this

species at least once every 8 years. Maintain species presence and continued use at 75% of identified locations.

8 F / D F / D YES




300




Objective Currently

Met? ‡

Parry's Spine Flower

Chorizanthe parryi var. parryi

Objective 2: Include within the MSHCP Conservation Area twenty (20) occurrences of Parry’s spine flower, including locations throughout the Vail

Lake area and in the vicinity of Lake Mathews, Gavilan Hills, Antelope Valley, Rawson Canyon, Santa Rosa Hills, Reche Canyon, Wilson Valley,

Juniper Flats, Gilman Hot Springs Road and Diamond Valley Lake. Confirm 10 localities (locality in this sense is not smaller than 1 quarter

section) with at least 1,000. Covered Species not adequately conserved until the above objective is met.

Note: Unable to meet Objective 2 at this time because it includes locations that are not within Conservation Area and some occurrences that cannot

be relocated. Surveys are ongoing. Objective 3 has been met.


Payson's Jewelflower

Caulanthus simulans



Note: No monitoring objectives for this species.

8 F / D N / N YES

Peninsular Spine Flower

Chorizanthe leptotheca

Objective 2: Confirm 10 localities (locality in this sense is not smaller than 1 quarter section) with at least 1,000 individuals. Maintain species

presence and continued use at 75% of identified locations. 8 F / D F / D YES




301




Objective Currently

Met? ‡

Plummer's Mariposa Lily

Calochortus plummerae

Objective 2: Include within the MSHCP Conservation Area at least eight of the known occurrences (near Hemet Lake within Garner Valley within the San Jacinto Mountains, the Jurupa Hills, Reche Canyon, along Highway

74 in the San Jacinto Mountains and west of Oak Glen Conservation Camp within the San Bernardino Mountains) of Plummer’s mariposa lily.

Objective 3: Confirm 6 localities (locality in this sense is not smaller than 1 quarter section) of at least 500 individuals. Covered Species not

adequately conserved until the above objective is met.

8 F / D F / D YES

Prostrate Navarretia

Navarretia prostrata

Objective 1: Include within the MSHCP Conservation Area at least the one known occurrence of this species on the Santa Rosa Plateau. Monitor the distribution of this species at least once every 8 years. Maintain species


8 F / D N / N YES

Prostrate Spine Flower

Chorizanthe procumbens

Objective 2: Include within the MSHCP Conservation Area at least 14 of the known locations (in the Santa Ana Mountains, in the Agua Tibia

Mountains including the Core Area at Dorland Mountain, west of Beaumont, and the vicinity of French Valley). Monitor the distribution of this species at least once every 8 years. Maintain species presence and


Note: Unable to meet Objective 2 as written in the Species Account. The Biological Opinion states that there are only 8 valid historical records.

Revision of objectives is needed. Surveys are ongoing.

8 F / D N / N NO




302




Objective Currently

Met? ‡

Rainbow Manzanita

Arctostaphylos rainbowensis

Objective 2: Include within the MSHCP Conservation Area the 15 known localities of Rainbow manzanita: San Mateo Canyon Wilderness, Gavilan Mountain, Santa Margarita Ecological MSHCP Conservation Area, Santa

Rosa Plateau and the Temecula, Wildomar, Margarita Peak and Pechanga areas.

Objective 3: Confirm 10 localities (locality in this sense is not smaller than 1 quarter section) with more than 50 individuals each. Covered Species

not adequately conserved until the above objective is met.

Note: Revision of Objective 2 is needed since some locations are not in conservation. Objective 3 has been met.


Round- leaved Filaree

Erodium macrophyllum

Objective 2: Include within the MSHCP Conservation Area eight out of the 10 known localities of round-leaved filaree: four occurrences in the Gavilan

Hills region, one at Lake Mathews, one along Temescal Wash near Lee Lake, one at Diamond Valley Lake and one in the foothills of the Agua

Tibia Mountains. Monitor the distribution of this species at least once every 8 years. Maintain species presence and continued use at 75% of identified

locations.

Note: Unable to meet Objective 2 at this time because it includes locations that are not within Conservation Area and some occurrences that cannot

be relocated. Revision of objectives is needed. Surveys are ongoing.

8 F / D N / N NO




303




Objective Currently

Met? ‡

San Diego Ambrosia Ambrosia pumila

Objective 2: Include within the MSHCP Conservation Area at least two of the three known locations of this species: Alberhill Creek at Nichols Road and Skunk Hollow. Monitor the distribution of this species at least once every 8 years. Maintain species presence and continued use at 75% of


Note: Unable to meet Objective 2 as written because it includes a location (Alberhill Creek at Nichols Road) that is not within the Conservation Area.

Revision of Objective 2 is needed.

8 F / D N / N NO

San Diego Button- celery

Eryngium aristulatum var.

parishii

Objective 1: Include within the MSHCP Conservation Area at least four known locations on the Santa Rosa Plateau. Monitor the distribution of this

species at least once every 8 years. Maintain species presence and continued use at 75% of identified locations.

8 F / D F / D YES

San Jacinto Mountains Bedstraw

Galium angustifolium ssp.

jacinticum

Objective 2: Include within the MSHCP Conservation Area at least eight of the known locations of this species: Lake Fulmor, Dark Canyon and the

Black Mountain area. Monitor the distribution of this species at least once every 8 years. Maintain species presence and continued use at 75% of


Note: Unable to meet Objective 2 as written. There are fewer historical records than required. All listed locations and additional, alternate

occurrences have been confirmed. Revision of objectives is needed.

8 F / D N / N NO




304




Objective Currently

Met? ‡

San Jacinto Valley

Crownscale Atriplex coronata

var. notatior

Objective 2: Include within the MSHCP Conservation Area the Alberhill Creek locality as well as the three Core Areas, located along the San

Jacinto River from the vicinity of Mystic Lake southwest to the vicinity of Perris and in the upper Salt Creek drainage west of Hemet. Monitor the distribution of this species at least once every 8 years. Maintain species


8 F / D N / I YES

San Miguel Savory

Satureja chandleri

Objective 2: Include within the MSHCP Conservation Area at least seven of the known locations of San Miguel savory on the Santa Rosa Plateau; in the vicinity of Tenaja guard station and three miles south of Murrieta

near De Luz Road in the Santa Ana Mountains; and three miles southwest of Murrieta near Warner’s Ranch. Monitor the distribution of this species at least once every 8 years. Maintain species presence and continued use at


Note: Unable to meet Objective 2 as written. Objective includes locations that cannot be found (old historical records) and locations that are not

within the Conservation Area. Revision of objectives is needed.

8 F / D N / N NO

Santa Ana River Woollystar

Eriastrum densifolium ssp.

sanctorum

Objective 2: Include within the MSHCP Conservation Area at least three localities of this species along the Santa Ana River near the San

Bernardino County border. Monitor the distribution of this species at least once every 8 years. Maintain species presence and continued use at 75%


8 F / D N / N YES




305




Objective Currently

Met? ‡

Shaggy- haired Alumroot

Heuchera hirsutissima

Objective 2: Include within the MSHCP Conservation Area the two known localities of this plant in the San Jacinto Mountains: one locality lies on the western slopes of the San Jacinto Mountains above the San Jacinto River

and the other locality is in a gully behind Tahquitz Rock. Monitor the distribution of this species at least once every 8 years. Maintain species


Note: Unable to meet Objective 2 as written because it includes a location that is not within the Plan Area. Revision of objectives is needed.

8 F / D N / N NO

Slender- horned Spine Flower

Dodecahema leptoceras

Objective 2: Include within the MSHCP Conservation Area at least 11 of the known locations of this species, including Temescal Canyon, Bautista Canyon, upper San Jacinto River, Agua Tibia Wilderness Area, Alberhill, Alberhill Creek east of Lake Elsinore, Railroad Canyon, Vail Lake, Kolb

Creek, and east of State Street south of Hemet. Monitor the distribution of this species at least once every 8 years. Maintain species presence and


Note: Unable to meet Objective 2 as written. Objective includes locations that are not within the Conservation Area and duplicate records. Revision

of objectives is needed.

8 F / D N / N NO




306




Objective Currently

Met? ‡

Small-flowered Microseris

Microseris douglasii var. platycarpha

Objective 2: Include within the MSHCP Conservation Area at least eight of the known locations at Lake Matthews, in the Cleveland National Forest,

at Lake Skinner and at Vail Lake. Confirm 10 localities (locality in this sense is not smaller than 1 quarter section) with at least 1,000 individuals.

Covered Species not adequately conserved until the above objective is met.

Note: Surveys for Objectives 2 are ongoing to reconfirm expired

occurrences and meet monitoring interval requirement. Objective 3 has been met.


Small- flowered Morning-glory

Convolvulus simulans

Objective 2: Include within the MSHCP Conservation Area at least eight of the known localities (including Vail Lake, Lake Skinner, Lake Mathews,

Temescal Canyon, Alberhill, Santa Rosa Plateau, Santa Ana Mountains, and Skunk Hollow) of this species. Monitor the distribution of this species at least once every 8 years. Maintain species presence and continued use


8 F / D N / N YES

Smooth Tarplant Centromadia pungens

Objective 2: Include within the MSHCP Conservation Area at least 27 of the known occurrences of this species at Antelope Valley; Temescal

Canyon; Lake Elsinore; Murrieta Creek; French Valley; Lakeview Mountains; Lake Skinner; Diamond Valley Lake; Sycamore Canyon Park;

Alberhill Creek; Lake Mathews; the Santa Ana River; and the core locations at the San Jacinto Wildlife Area, the middle segment of the San Jacinto River and upper Salt Creek. Monitor the distribution of this species at least once every 8 years. Maintain species presence and continued use


Note: Objective 2 includes many historical records that are not within Conservation Area. Surveys are ongoing.

8 F / D N / I NO




307




Objective Currently

Met? ‡

Spreading Navarretia

Navarretia fossalis

Objective 2: Include within the MSHCP Conservation Area at least 13 of the known locations of spreading naverretia at the Skunk Hollow, the Santa Rosa Plateau and core locations: the San Jacinto Wildlife Area,

floodplains of the San Jacinto River from the Ramona Expressway south to Railroad Canyon, and upper Salt Creek west of Hemet. Monitor the


Note: Unable to meet Objective 2 as written because several required

occurrences appear to be extirpated and objective includes locations that are not within Conservation Area.

8 F / D F / D NO

Sticky- leaved Dudleya Dudleya viscida

Objective 2: Include within the MSHCP Conservation Area the three populations within the San Mateo Wilderness Area of the Santa Ana

Mountains. Monitor the distribution of this species at least once every 8 years. Maintain species presence and continued use at 75% of identified

locations.

8 F / D N / N YES

Thread- leaved Brodiaea Brodiaea filifolia

Objective 2: Include within the MSHCP Conservation Area the Core Areas located at Goetz Road (EO1), Perris Valley airport (EO2), Tenaja Road (EO3), Mesa de Colorado (EO5), Hemet vernal pools (EO 26), South SJWA (EO27), Squaw Mountain (EO29), Santa Rosa ranch (EO30),

Slaughterhouse (EO31), North SJWA (EO43) and Redondo Mesa (EO 52). Monitor the distribution of this species at least once every 8 years.


Note: Unable to meet this Objective 2 at this time. Objective includes locations that are not within the Conservation Area and records for

misidentified species. Revision of objectives is needed.

8 F / D F / D NO




308




Objective Currently

Met? ‡

Vail Lake Ceanothus

Ceanothus ophiochilus

Objective 2: Include within the MSHCP Conservation Area at least three core locations in the vicinity of Vail Lake and the Agua Tibia Wilderness area. Monitor the distribution of this species at least once every 8 years.


Note: Unable to meet Objective 2 at this time. Objective includes locations

that are not within the Conservation Area.

8 F / D N / N NO

Vernal Barley Hordeum intercedens

Objective 2: Include within the MSHCP Conservation Area at least four locations (including three core locations) of vernal barley: the San Jacinto Wildlife Area, the middle segment of the San Jacinto River from Ramona

Expressway south to Railroad Canyon, the upper Salt Creek drainage west of Hemet, and the occurrence near Nichols Road at Alberhill. Monitor


Note: Unable to meet Objective 2 at this time because monitoring surveys

at one location have been unsuccessful. Surveys are ongoing.

8 F / D N / I NO




309




Objective Currently

Met? ‡

Wright's Trichocoronis

Trichocoronis wrightii var.

wrightii

Objective 2: Include within the MSHCP Conservation Area at least four of the known locations along the San Jacinto River from the vicinity of the

Ramona Expressway and San Jacinto Wildlife Area and along the northern shore of Mystic Lake. Monitor the distribution of this species at


Note: Unable to meet Objective 2 because one or more required

occurrences appears to be extirpated. Objective includes locations that are not within the Conservation Area.

8 F / D N / N NO

Yucaipa Onion Allium marvinii Default monitoring objective§: Monitor the distribution of this species at


8 F / D N / N YES




310

TABLE B - 3 Status of Covered Species Monitoring - Not Adequately Conserved1


Common Name Latin Name Table 9-3 Requirement Table 9-3

Requirement Met?

Beautiful Hulsea Hulsea vestita ssp. callicarpha

Within the MSHCP Conservation Area, confirm 16 localities (locality in this sense is not smaller than one quarter section) with no fewer than 50 individuals each (unless a smaller population has been demonstrated to be self-sustaining).

YES

California Bedstraw Galium californicum ssp. primum A Memorandum of Understanding must be executed with the Forest Service that addresses management for this species on Forest Service Land. NO

California Muhly Muhlenbergia californica

Within the MSHCP Conservation Area, confirm 10 localities (locality in this sense is not smaller than one quarter section) containing at least 50 clumps (unless a smaller population has been demonstrated to be self-sustaining). NOTE: Species does not occur within the Plan Area.

NO

California Spotted Owl Strix occidentalis occidentalis A Memorandum of Understanding must be executed with the Forest Service that addresses management for this species on Forest Service Land. NO

Chickweed Oxytheca Oxytheca caryophylloides

Within the MSHCP Conservation Area, confirm 10 localities (locality in this sense is not smaller than one quarter section) managed with 1,000 individuals each (unless a smaller population has been demonstrated to be self-sustaining). NOTE: Objective 2 has been met. Surveys for Objectives 3 are ongoing to meet the minimum population size requirement.

NO

Cleveland's Bush Monkeyflower Mimulus clevelandii A Memorandum of Understanding must be executed with the Forest Service

that addresses management for this species on Forest Service Land. NO

Cliff Cinquefoil Potentilla rimicola Within the MSHCP Conservation Area, confirm five localities (locality in this sense is not smaller than one quarter section). NOTE: Objective includes duplicate records and species occurs mostly outside of the Plan Area.

NO

Coulter's Matilija Poppy Romneya coulteri Within the MSHCP Conservation Area, confirm 30 localities (locality in this sense is not smaller than one quarter section). YES

Fish's Milkwort Polygala cornuta var. fishiae

Within the MSHCP Conservation Area, confirm 10 localities (locality in this sense is not smaller than one quarter section) with at least 50 individuals (ramets or genets) each (unless a smaller population has been demonstrated to be self-sustaining).

YES

Graceful Tarplant Holocarpha virgata ssp. elongata Within the MSHCP Conservation Area, confirm 10 localities (locality in this sense is not smaller than one quarter section) with 1,000 individuals each (unless a smaller population has been demonstrated to be self-sustaining).

YES

311




Requirement Met?

Grasshopper Sparrow Ammodramus savannarum

Within the MSHCP Conservation Area, maintain occupancy within 3 large Core Areas (100 percent) and at least 3 of the 4 smaller Core Areas (75 percent) in at least 1 year out of any 5 consecutive year period. In order for this species to become a Covered Species Adequately Conserved, the following conservation must be demonstrated: Include within the MSHCP Conservation Area at least 8,000 acres in 7 Core Areas. Three of the 7 Core Areas will be large, consisting of a minimum of 2,000 acres of grassland habitat or grassland dominated habitat (<20 percent shrub cover). The other 4 Core Areas may be smaller but will consist of at least 500 acres of contiguous grassland habitat or grassland-dominated habitat (<20 percent shrub cover). Five of the 7 Core Areas will be demonstrated to support at least 20 grasshopper sparrow pairs with evidence of successful reproduction within the first 5 years after permit issuance. Successful reproduction is defined as a nest which fledged at least one known young. NOTE: Occupancy of the large Core Areas has been confirmed, but not for the small Core Areas. The reproduction portion of the objective has not been met.

Partial

Lemon Lily Lilium parryi A Memorandum of Understanding must be executed with the Forest Service that addresses management for this species on Forest Service Land. NO

Lincoln's Sparrow Melospiza lincolnii

Within the MSHCP Conservation Area, maintain occupancy within 3 large Core Areas (100 percent) in at least 1 year out of any 5 consecutive-year period. In order for this species to become a Covered Species Adequately Conserved, the following conservation must be demonstrated: Include within the MSHCP Conservation Area at least 100 acres in 3 Core Areas. The three Core Areas will be large, consisting of a minimum of 50 acres of montane meadow, wet montane meadow, and edges of montane riparian or riparian scrub. The Core Areas will be demonstrated to support at least 20 Lincoln’s sparrow pairs with evidence of successful reproduction within the first 5 years after permit issuance. Successful reproduction is defined as a nest which fledged at least one known young. NOTE: Two of the suggested Core Areas are outside of the Plan Area. Reproductive objective possibly will not be met because suitable breeding habitat is difficult to locate in the Plan Area, and species is rarely present during the breeding season.

NO

312




Requirement Met?

Mojave Tarplant Deinandra mohavensis Include within the MSHCP Conservation Area at least four localities (locality in this sense is not smaller than one quarter section) occupying at least 100 acres. NOTE: Interpretation of acreage requirement necessary.

NO

Ocellated Humboldt Lily Lilium humboldtii ssp. ocellatum A Memorandum of Understanding must be executed with the Forest Service that addresses management for this species on Forest Service Land. NO

Parry's Spine Flower Chorizanthe parryi var. parryi Within the MSHCP Conservation Area, confirm 10 localities (locality in this sense is not smaller than one quarter section) with at least 1,000 individuals (unless a smaller population has been demonstrated to be self-sustaining).

YES

Peninsular Spine Flower Chorizanthe leptotheca Within the MSHCP Conservation Area, confirm 10 localities (locality in this sense is not smaller than one quarter section) with at least 1,000 individuals (unless a smaller population has been demonstrated to be self-sustaining).

YES

Plummer's Mariposa Lily Calochortus plummerae Within the MSHCP Conservation Area, confirm six localities (locality in this sense is not smaller than one quarter section) of at least 500 individuals each (unless a smaller population has been demonstrated to be self-sustaining).

YES

Rainbow Manzanita Arctostaphylos rainbowensis

Within the MSHCP Conservation Area, confirm 10 localities (locality in this sense is not smaller than one quarter section) with more than 50 individuals each (unless a smaller population has been demonstrated to be self-sustaining).

YES

San Bernardino Flying Squirrel Glaucomys sabrinus californicus

Within the MSHCP Conservation Area, confirm occupation of 1000 ha (2470 acres) with a mean density of at least 2 individuals per hectare (2 individuals per 2.47 acres) in the San Jacinto mountains; and in the San Bernardino Mountains confirm occupation of 100 ha. NOTE: USFS and SDNHM staff have determined it is extremely unlikely that the objective has been met. Focused surveys have not been conducted because of the assumed inefficient use of resources.

NO

San Bernardino Mountain Kingsnake Lampropeltis zonata parvirubra A Memorandum of Understanding must be executed with the Forest Service


San Diego Mountain Kingsnake Lampropeltis zonata pulchra A Memorandum of Understanding must be executed with the Forest Service


Shaggy- Haired Alumroot Heuchera hirsutissima A Memorandum of Understanding must be executed with the Forest Service that addresses management for this species on Forest Service Land. NO

313




Requirement Met?

Small- flowered Microseris Microseris douglasii var. platycarpha Within the MSHCP Conservation Area, confirm 10 localities (locality in this sense is not smaller than one quarter section) with at least 1,000 individuals (unless a smaller population has been demonstrated to be self-sustaining).

YES

Southern Rubber Boa Charina bottae umbratical A Memorandum of Understanding must be executed with the Forest Service that addresses management for this species on Forest Service Land. NO*

Southern Sagebrush Lizard Sceloporus graciosus vandenburgianus A Memorandum of Understanding must be executed with the Forest Service that addresses management for this species on Forest Service Land. NO

Sticky- leaved Dudleya Dudleya viscida A Memorandum of Understanding must be executed with the Forest Service that addresses management for this species on Forest Service Land. NO*

Williamson’s Sapsucker Sphyrapicus thyroideus A Memorandum of Understanding must be executed with the Forest Service that addresses management for this species on Forest Service Land. NO*

1 Refer to RCA website (https://www.wrc-rca.org/document-library/) for current status of species requirements met per Table 9-3 of the Volume I of the MSHCP. * Monitoring Objectives met, but MOU needed to move to Adequately Conserved.

314

https://www.wrc-rca.org/

TABLE B - 4 List of Covered Species Taxonomic Name Changes Since the MSHCP was Adopted


Taxon MSHCP

Common Name

MSHCP Latin Name

Current Common

Name Current Latin

Name Year Updated Naming Authority Citation Name change notes

Birds Bell's Sage Sparrow

Amphispiza belli belli

Bell's Sparrow

Artemisiospiza belli 1/1/2013

American Ornithologists'

Union

Chesser RT, Banks RC, Barker FK, Cicero C, Dunn JL, Kratter AW, Lovette IJ, Rasmussen PC, Remsen JV, Jr., Rising JD, Stotz DF, Winker K. 2013. Fifty-fourth supplement to the American Ornithologists'

Union Check-list of North American Birds. Auk 130:1-14.

New genus.

Birds Downy Woodpecker

Picoides pubescens

Downy Woodpecker

Dryobates pubescens 1/1/2018

American Ornithological

Society

Chesser RT, Burns KR, Cicero C, Dunn JL, Kratter AW, Lovette IJ, Rasmussen PC, Remsen JV, Jr., Stotz DF, Winger BM, Winker K. 2018. Fifty-ninth

supplement to the American Ornithological Society's Check-list of North American Birds. Auk 135:798-813.

New genus.

Birds MacGillivray's Warbler Oporornis tolmiei MacGillivray's

Warbler Geothlypis

tolmiei 1/1/2011 American Ornithologists' Union

Chesser RT, Banks RC, Barker FK, Cicero C, Dunn JL, Kratter AW, Lovette IJ, Rasmussen PC, Remsen JV, Jr., Rising JD, Stotz DF, Winker K. 2013. Fifty-second supplement to the American Ornithologists'


New genus.

Birds Nashville Warbler

Vermivora ruficapilla

Nashville Warbler

Leiothlypis ruficapilla 1/1/2019

American Ornithological

Society

Chesser RT, Burns KR, Cicero C, Dunn JL, Kratter AW, Lovette IJ, Rasmussen PC, Remsen JV, Jr.,

Stotz DF, Winker K. 2019. Sixtieth supplement to the American Ornithological Society's Check-list of North

American Birds. Auk 136:ukz042.

New genus.

Birds Wilson's Warbler Wilsonia pusilla Wilson's

Warbler Cardellina

pusilla 1/1/2011 American Ornithologists' Union



New genus.

Birds Yellow Warbler Dendroica petechia brewsteri

Yellow Warbler

Setophaga petechia 1/1/2011 American

Ornithologists' Union



New genus.

315



Taxon MSHCP

Common Name

MSHCP Latin Name

Current Common

Name Current Latin


Herps Arroyo Toad Bufo californicus Arroyo Toad Anaxyrus californicus 2006

Society for the Study of Amphibians and

Reptiles

Frost, D.R., Grant, T., Faivovich, J., Bain, R.H., Haas, A., Haddad, C.F.B., de Sa´, R.O., Channing, A., Wilkinson, M., Donnellan, S.C., Raxworthy, C.J.,

Campbell, J.A., Blotto, B.L., Moler, P., Drewes, R.C., Nussbaum, R.A., Lynch, J.D., Green, D.M., Wheeler, W.C., 2006. The amphibian tree of life. B. Am. Mus.

Nat. Hist. 297, 1–370.

This taxon of strictly North American toads was removed from “Bufo” (as well as were a number of other taxa) by Frost

et al. (2006) as a revision to render a monophyletic

taxonomy and with genera delimited to be more compact

than the unwieldy "Bufo".

Herps California Red- legged Frog

Rana aurora draytonii

California Red-legged

Frog Rana draytonii 2004


Reptiles

Shaffer HB, Fellers GM, Voss SR, Oliver JC, Pauly, GB. 2004. Species boundaries, phylogeography and conservation genetics of the red‐legged frog (Rana aurora/draytonii) complex. Molecular ecology. 13:9

Schaeffer et al. in a 2004 genetics study determined that R. aurora actually consists of

two species, R. aurora, and R. draytonii, whose ranges

overlap only in a narrow zone in Mendocino County. Before being split into two species,

two subspecies of Rana aurora were recognized: R. a. aurora,

and R. a. draytonii. Frogs in the very large area between

Del Norte County and the Walker Creek drainage in

Marin County were considered to be intergrades.

Herps Coast Range Newt

Taricha torosa torosa

California Newt Taricha torosa 2007

Society for the Study of

Amphibians and Reptiles

Crother, B. I. (ed.). 2017. Scientific and Standard English Names of Amphibians and Reptiles of North America North of Mexico, with Comments Regarding Confidence in Our Understanding pp. 1–102. SSAR

Herpetological Circular 43. Kuchta, S. R. (2007). ''Contact zones and species limits: hybridization between lineages of the California Newt, Taricha

torosa, in the southern Sierra Nevada.''Herpetologica, 63, 332-350.

The Coast Range Newt was originally thought to be a

subspecies of T. torosa based on geographic distribution and

coloration. However, recent phylogeographic work on T. t. torosa and T. t. sierrae, has

shown that the two subspecies constitute distinct evolutionary lineages justifying recognition as separate species. (Crother

2017; Kuchta 2007).

316



Taxon MSHCP

Common Name

MSHCP Latin Name

Current Common

Name Current Latin


Herps Coastal Western Whiptail

Cnemidophorus tigris

multiscutatus San Diegan

Tiger Whiptail Aspidoscelis tigris

stejnegeri 2002/2012 Society for the Study of Amphibians and

Reptiles

Reeder TW, Cole CJ, Dessauer HC. 2002. Phylogenetic Relationships of Whiptail Lizards of the Genus Cnemidophorus (Squamata: Teiidae): A Test of Monophyly, Reevaluation of Karyotypic Evolution,

and Review of Hybrid Origins. American Museum Novitates 2002(3365), 1-61. Crother et al. 2012. Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles Herpetological Circular No. 39. Ed. Moriarty JJ.

Genus changed from Cnemidophorus to

Aspidoscelis (Reeder et al. 2002) with the treatment of A.

t. stejnegeri as the name of the subspecies of A. tigris

occurring in coastal southern California. The common name

was changed from Coastal Western Whiptail to San

Diegan Tiger Whiptail in the Seventh edition of the S.S.A.R.

list, published in 2012.

Herps Granite Night Lizard

Xantusia henshawi henshawi

Granite Night Lizard

Xantusia henshawi 2001


Reptiles

Lovich, R. 2001. Phylogeography of the night lizard (Xantusia henshawi), in southern California: evolution

across fault zones. Herpetologica 57(4):470-487.

Called Xantusia henshawi henshawi - Henshaw's Night

Lizard, after the discovery of X. h. gracilis. It was returned to full species status in 2001 when Lovich elevated X. gracilis to a full species in

2001.

Herps Northern Red

Diamond Rattlesnake

Crotalus ruber ruber

Red Diamond Rattlesnake Crotolus ruber 2000/2012

The International Commission on

Zoological Nomenclature

The International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN). 2000. Vol. 57: 189–190

(multiple research/authors recognized). Retrieved from

https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/45022#page/211/mode/1up .Stebbins, Robert C., and McGinnis,

Samuel M. Field Guide to Amphibians and Reptiles of California: Revised Edition (California Natural History

Guides) University of California Press, 2012.

ICZN ruled that the name Crotalus ruber Cope 1892 takes precedence over C.

exsul Garman 1884 when used as a specific epithet. This

ruling removed subspecies status as well. Though, it didn't

appear in field guides until 2012.

317



Taxon MSHCP

Common Name

MSHCP Latin Name

Current Common

Name Current Latin


Herps Orange- throated Whiptail

Cnemidophorus hyperythrus

beldingi

Belding’s Orange- throated Whiptail

Aspidoscelis hyperythrus

beldingi 2002/2014


Reptiles

Reeder TW, Cole CJ, Dessauer HC. 2002. Phylogenetic Relationships of Whiptail Lizards of the Genus Cnemidophorus (Squamata: Teiidae): A Test of Monophyly, Reevaluation of Karyotypic Evolution,

and Review of Hybrid Origins. American Museum Novitates 2002(3365), 1-61. Taylor, Harry L. and

James M. Walker. 2014. Pan-Peninsular pattern of morphological variation in Aspidoscelis hyperythra

(Squamata: Teiidae), Baja California, Mexico. Southwestern Naturalist Jun 2014, Vol. 59, No. 2:

221-227.

Genus changed from Cnemidophorus to

Aspidoscelis (Reeder et al. 2002). A multivariate analysis

of morphological variation in A. hyperythra by Taylor and

Walker (2014) found evidence of differentiation between

populations north and south of the Isthmus of La Paz, which

have previously been recognized as the subspecies

A. h. beldingi and A. h. hyperythra. SSAR no longer recognizes the subspecies,

though it should be noted that this genus classification may

still be in flux.

Herps

San Diego Mountain Kingsnake

Lampropeltis zonata pulchra

California Mountain


zonata 7/31/2013 Society for the Study of Amphibians and

Reptiles

E. A. Myers,J. A. Rodríguez-Robles, D. F. DeNardo, R. E. Staub A. Stropoli, S. Ruane, F. T. Burbrink.

2013. Multilocus phylogeographic assessment of the California Mountain Kingsnake (Lampropeltis zonata) suggests alternative patterns of diversification for the California Floristic Province. Molecular Ecology 21:22

This species was investigated using a multi-locus nuclear

dataset (Myers et al., 2013), finding multiple species-level

taxa. This species now comprises the formerly

recognized subspecies L. z. zonata, L. z. multicincta, and L. z. multifasciata (part), including

populations from the Sierra Nevada north.

San Bernardino Mountain Kingsnake

Lampropeltis zonata

parvirubra

Herps San Diego Banded Gecko

Coleonyx variegatus

abbotti

San Diego Banded Gecko

Coleonyx variegatus

abbotti 2015


Reptiles

Leavitt, DH. 2015. Lineage Diversification in Southwestern Lizards: Accounting for Introgression at

Multiple Timescales [PhD Thesis]. University of California, Davis in Davis CA, and San Diego State

University in San Diego, CA

New mt and nuDNA study shows this subspecies to be 2 separate subspecies with an area of integrade, all of which may occur in the Plan area.

Since the majority of the Plan area is within C.v.abbotti

range, we will continue to use the Plan name.

Desert Banded Gecko

Coleonyx variegatus variegatus

Herps San Diego Horned Lizard

Phrynosoma coronatum blainvillei

Blainville's Horned Lizard

Phrynosoma blainvillii 2004


Reptiles

Montanucci RR. 2004. Geographic Variation in Phrynosoma Coronatum (Lacertilia,

Phrynosomatidae): Further Evidence for a Peninsular Archipelago. Herpetologica 60(1):117-139

Montanucci (2004) treatment of P. blainvillii as a separate

species from P. coronatum.

318



Taxon MSHCP

Common Name

MSHCP Latin Name

Current Common

Name Current Latin


Herps Southern Rubber Boa

Charina bottae umbratica

Southern Rubber Boa

Charina umbratica 2001


Reptiles

Javier A. Rodríguez-Robles, Glenn R. Stewart, and Theodore J. Papenfus. 2001. Mitochondrial DNA-

Based Phylogeography of North American Rubber Boas, Charina bottae (Serpentes: Boidae).

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution Vol. 18, No. 2, February, pp. 227–237

Rodríguez-Robles et al. (2001) found C. b. umbratical to be

morphologically and geographically distinct and were elevated to species status based in part on lineages using mtDNA

evidence along with with allozyme data from a previous

study (Weisman, 1988, MS Thesis, CSU Polytechnic

Pomona)

Herps Western Pond Turtle

Clemmys marmorata

pallida Southwestern Pond Turtle

Actinemys pallida

2001/2002/2003/2008/2016


Reptiles

Holman, J.A. and U. Fritz. 2001. A new emydine species from the Middle Miocene (Barstovian) of

Nebraska, USA with a new generic arrangement for the species of Clemmys sensu McDowell (1964) (Reptilia: Testudines : Emydidae). Zoologische

Abhandlungen, Staaliches Museum fur Tierkunde Dresden 51, 331–354. Crother, B.I., et al. 2008.

Scientific and standard English names of amphibians and reptiles of North America north of Mexico.

Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles, Herpetological Circular No. 37. J10. Spinks PQ,

Thomson RC, McCartney-Melstad RC, Shaffer, HP. 2016. Phylogeny and temporal diversification of the

New World pond turtles (Emydidae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. V103.

In 2001, a new arrangement for the genus Clemmys was

published by Holman and Fritz (2001), placing it into the

genus Actinemys. But in 2002, Feldman and Parham (2002) placed it back to its earliest

genus Emys because they did not recognize Actinemys as a monotypic genus. In 2003, the

Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles used

Actinemys and Pacific pond turtle (Crother et al. 2008).

Subsequently in 2016, Spinks et al. demonstrated deep

phylogeographic divergence within the genus,

corresponding to the previously recognized subspecies, and recommended full species

recognition for pallida.

Herps Western Spadefoot

Scaphiopus hammondii

Western Spadefoot

Spea hammondii 1991


Reptiles

Wiens JJ, and Titus TA. 1991. A Phylogenetic Analysis of Spea (Anura: Pelobatidae). Herpetologica

47:1

Wiens and Titus (1991) recognized Spea as distinct

from Scaphiopus, within which it was previously regarded as a

subgenus.

319



Taxon MSHCP

Common Name

MSHCP Latin Name

Current Common

Name Current Latin


Mammals San Diego

Desert Woodrat

Neotoma lepida intermedia

Bryant's woodrat

Neotoma bryanti intermedia 6/12/2014

Arctos (https://arctos.databa

se.museum/)

Patton JL, Huckaby DG, Álvarez-Castañeda ST. The evolutionary history and a systematic revision of woodrats of the Neotoma lepida group. Univ of

California Press; 2007.

Plants California Black Walnut

Juglans californica var.

californica

Southern California

Black Walnut Juglans

californica 8/17/2006 Jepson Flora Project Alan T. Whittemore 2012, Juglans californica, in

Jepson Flora Project (eds.) Jepson eFlora, https://ucjeps.berkeley.edu/eflora/eflora_display.php?ti

d=29566, accessed on January 19, 2021.

Plants Chickweed Oxytheca

Oxytheca caryophylloides

Chickweed Oxytheca

Sidotheca caryophylloides 3/3/2005 Jepson Flora Project

James L. Reveal & Thomas J. Rosatti 2012, Sidotheca caryophylloides, in Jepson Flora Project

(eds.) Jepson eFlora, https://ucjeps.berkeley.edu/eflora/eflora_display.php?ti


Jepson accepted synonym: Eriogonum caryophylloides.

Plants Cleveland's

Bush Monkeyflower

Mimulus clevelandii

Cleveland's Bush

Monkeyflower Diplacus

clevelandii 3/1/2017 Jepson Flora Project Naomi S. Fraga 2018, Diplacus clevelandii, in Jepson

Flora Project (eds.) Jepson eFlora, Revision 6, https://ucjeps.berkeley.edu/eflora/eflora_display.php?ti


Plants Johnston's Rock Cress Arabis johnstonii Johnston's

Rock Cress Boechera johnstonii 1/1/2012 Jepson Flora Project

Michael D. Windham & Ihsan A. Al-Shehbaz 2012, Boechera johnstonii, in Jepson Flora Project (eds.)

Jepson eFlora, https://ucjeps.berkeley.edu/eflora/eflora_display.php?ti


Jepson accepted synonyms: Arabis hirshbergiae, Boechera

hirshbergiae.

Plants Little Mousetail Myosurus

minimus ssp. apus

Little Mousetail

Myosurus minimus 11/1/2001 Jepson Flora Project

Alan T. Whittemore 2012, Myosurus minimus, in Jepson Flora Project (eds.) Jepson eFlora,

https://ucjeps.berkeley.edu/eflora/eflora_display.php?tid=34224, accessed on January 28, 2021.

Plants Mud Nama Nama stenocarpum Mud Nama Nama stenocarpa 7/29/2013 Jepson Flora Project

Sarah Taylor 2012, Nama stenocarpa, in Jepson Flora Project (eds.) Jepson eFlora,

https://ucjeps.berkeley.edu/eflora/eflora_display.php?tid=34387, accessed on January 20, 2021.

Plants Parish's Meadowfoam

Limnanthes gracilis ssp.

parishi

Parish's Meadowfoam

Limnanthes alba ssp. parishii 1/10/2008 Jepson Flora Project

Robert Ornduff & Nancy R. Morin 2012, Limnanthes alba subsp. parishii, in Jepson Flora Project (eds.)



Jepson accepted synonym: Limnanthes versicolor var.

parishii.

Plants Round- leaved Filaree

Erodium macrophyllum

Round- leaved Filaree

California macrophylla 3/1/2007 Jepson Flora Project

Marisa Alarcón, Carlos Aedo & Carmen Navarro 2012, California macrophylla, in Jepson Flora Project (eds.)



Jepson accepted synonym: Erodium macrophlluym var.

californicum.

320

APPENDIX C


Annual Report (January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020) C-3

APPENDIX C Staff Training

321

APPENDIX C



2020 Staff Training:

• All staff participated in All-hands Meeting on April 9, October 7, November 4 and December 2.

• Taxa Leads participated in Leads Meeting on January 23, March 9, May 14, September 9, October 6, November 3, and December 1.

• Avian Lead participated in the monthly San Jacinto Wildlife Area Coordination Working Group meeting.

• Introductory training of new Field Biologist.

• New Field Biologist completed defense driving training.

• Staff with expiring certifications received CPR/First Aid online training and certification.

• January 2020, all staff took safety training on canoe hoist and power tools.

• Herpetology Taxa Lead, Bob Packard and Survey Lead, Espie Sandoval attended the California and Nevada Amphibian Population Taskforce conference January 9-10, 2020 in San Diego, CA.

• Data Manager attended an Access Advanced Computer Course on January 9-10.

• All Staff attended the pre-survey meeting for bird surveys on January 22, 2020.

• Avian Lead participated in Tricolored Blackbird Working Group on February 18, 2020.

• Avian Lead participated in California Department of Fish and Wildlife Science Symposium on February 25-26, 2020.

• Selected Staff attended the U.S. Geological Survey training for the California Gnatcatcher Regional Survey 2020 at the San Diego Field Station on February 27, 2020.

• All staff attended the Least Bell’s Vireo pre-survey meeting on March 23, 2020.

• Mammal Taxa Lead attended the San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat Working Group Meeting on April 23, 2020.

• Selected Staff attended Los Angeles Pocket Mouse pre-survey training online on June 10, 2020.

• All Staff attended the online ArcGIS training on September 1, 2020.

• All Staff attended the online post-survey meeting for Mountain Plover and overwintering raptor surveys on September 9, 2020.

• Program Manager and Biologist Supervisor attended The Wildlife Society Annual Meeting (September 28-October 2, 2020). o Biologist Supervisor attended the “Geospatial analysis with R” Course

• Selected Staff started training for Purple Martin Surveys in October 2020.

322

APPENDIX C



• All Staff attended the online post-survey meeting for American Bittern surveys on October 7, 2020.

• All Staff attended the online pre-survey meeting for Engelmann Oak surveys on October 13, 2020 and field training on October 14 2020.

• Selected Staff attended the Riverwalk in field training on October 15, 2020.

• Field Biologist attended the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Virtual Burrowing Owl Annual Meeting on October 26, 2020.

• Avian Taxa Lead attended the California Department of Fish and Wildlife course: “Writing your Research for Publication” on October 26/28, 2020.

• Avian and Botany Lead attended National Habitat Conservation Plan Annual Meeting on November 17-18, 2020.

• All Staff attended the online post-survey meeting for Northern Harrier and White-tailed Kite on December 2, 2020.

• Botany Lead and Data Manager participated in Phacelia stellaris Candidate Conservation Agreement working group meeting on December 12, 2020.

• Field biologists trained during the San Jacinto Christmas Bird Count on December 15, 2020.

323

AGENDA ITEM 9

BLANK

Agenda Item 9


DATE: March 7, 2022


FROM: Lisa Mobley, Administrative Services Manager/Clerk of the Board


SUBJECT: Proposed Amended Board of Directors Meeting Schedule

STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Board of Directors to consider a change in start time to 12:00 p.m. for Board Meetings and adopt an amended 2022 Board of Directors Meeting Schedule.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The Board of Directors is scheduled to meet on the first Monday of each month at 12:30 p.m. On occasion, the meeting runs long, and members must leave due to another agency’s regularly scheduled meeting beginning at 2:00 p.m. Staff was asked to bring an item to the Board to consider changing the start time of the meetings from 12:30 p.m. to 12:00 p.m. to allow more time for Board discussion. Attachment: Proposed Amended 2022 Board of Directors/Executive Committee Meeting Schedule

324

BLANK

2022 RCA Meeting Schedule

2022 MEETING SCHEDULE

Meeting Date (Monday)

Board of Directors Location

January 10** 12:30 p.m. CAC Board Room, 4080 Lemon St, 1st Flr, Riverside, CA* February 7 12:30 p.m. CAC Board Room, 4080 Lemon St, 1st Flr, Riverside, CA*

March 7 12:30 p.m. CAC Board Room, 4080 Lemon St, 1st Flr, Riverside, CA* April 4 12:00 p.m. CAC Board Room, 4080 Lemon St, 1st Flr, Riverside, CA* May 2 12:00 p.m. CAC Board Room, 4080 Lemon St, 1st Flr, Riverside, CA* June 6 12:00 p.m. CAC Board Room, 4080 Lemon St, 1st Flr, Riverside, CA*

July 11** 12:00 p.m. CAC Board Room, 4080 Lemon St, 1st Flr, Riverside, CA* August DARK DARK

September 12** 12:00 p.m. CAC Board Room, 4080 Lemon St, 1st Flr, Riverside, CA* October 3 12:00 p.m. CAC Board Room, 4080 Lemon St, 1st Flr, Riverside, CA*

November 7 12:00 p.m. CAC Board Room, 4080 Lemon St, 1st Flr, Riverside, CA* December 5 12:00 p.m. CAC Board Room, 4080 Lemon St, 1st Flr, Riverside, CA*

The Board of Director meetings are held on the first Monday of each month.

*Meetings will be conducted via teleconference and telephone only, in accordance with AB 361 due to state or local officials recommendingmeasures to promote social distancing, until further notice.

**This meeting is being held on an alternate day due to it falling on a holiday.

325

2022 RCA Meeting Schedule

Meeting Date (Wednesday)

Executive Committee Location

January 19 12:00 p.m. March Field Conference Room, 4080 Lemon St, 3rd Flr, Riverside, CA* February 16 12:00 p.m. March Field Conference Room, 4080 Lemon St, 3rd Flr, Riverside, CA*

March 16 12:00 p.m. March Field Conference Room, 4080 Lemon St, 3rd Flr, Riverside, CA* April 20 12:00 p.m. March Field Conference Room, 4080 Lemon St, 3rd Flr, Riverside, CA* May 18 12:00 p.m. March Field Conference Room, 4080 Lemon St, 3rd Flr, Riverside, CA* June 15 12:00 p.m. March Field Conference Room, 4080 Lemon St, 3rd Flr, Riverside, CA*

July DARK DARK August 17 12:00 p.m. March Field Conference Room, 4080 Lemon St, 3rd Flr, Riverside, CA*

September 21 12:00 p.m. March Field Conference Room, 4080 Lemon St, 3rd Flr, Riverside, CA* October 19 12:00 p.m. March Field Conference Room, 4080 Lemon St, 3rd Flr, Riverside, CA*

November 16 12:00 p.m. March Field Conference Room, 4080 Lemon St, 3rd Flr, Riverside, CA* December 21 12:00 p.m. March Field Conference Room, 4080 Lemon St, 3rd Flr, Riverside, CA*

The Executive Committee is held on the third Wednesday of each month.

*Meetings will be conducted via teleconference and telephone only, in accordance with AB 361 due to state or local officials recommending measures to promote social distancing, until further notice.

326

AGENDA ITEM 10

PRESENTATION

Date post:	09-Apr-2023
Category:	Documents
Upload:	khangminh22
View:	0 times
Download:	0 times