Unique_Feature_Code Associated_Feature_No1 Associated_Feature_No2 Previousl Hunt_num AMS102 Y AMS103 Y AMS104 Y 950 AMS105 Y 951 AMS106 Y 953 AMS107 Moai 955 Moai 956 Y 954 AMS108 Moai 954 Moai 956 Y 955 AMS109 Moai 954 Moai 955 Y 956 AMS110 Moai 958 Moai 959 Y 957 AMS111 Moai 957 Moai 959 Y 958 AMS112 Moai 957 Moai 958 Y 959 AMS113 AMS68 AMS69 Y 960 AMS114 AMS87 Toa Toa quarry Y 961 AMS115 AMS46 Y 962 AMS116 Y 963 AMS117 Y 633 AMS120 AMS121 AMS240 Y 964 or 965 AMS121 AMS120 AMS240 Y 964 or 965 AMS122 Y 966 AMS123 Y 967 AMS124 AMS169 Y 968 AMS125 Y 969
Transcript
Unique_Feature_Code Associated_Feature_No1 Associated_Feature_No2 Previousl Hunt_numAMS102 YAMS103 YAMS104 Y 950AMS105 Y 951AMS106 Y 953AMS107 Moai 955 Moai 956 Y 954AMS108 Moai 954 Moai 956 Y 955AMS109 Moai 954 Moai 955 Y 956AMS110 Moai 958 Moai 959 Y 957AMS111 Moai 957 Moai 959 Y 958AMS112 Moai 957 Moai 958 Y 959AMS113 AMS68 AMS69 Y 960AMS114 AMS87 Toa Toa quarry Y 961AMS115 AMS46 Y 962AMS116 Y 963AMS117 Y 633AMS120 AMS121 AMS240 Y 964 or 965AMS121 AMS120 AMS240 Y 964 or 965AMS122 Y 966AMS123 Y 967AMS124 AMS169 Y 968AMS125 Y 969
in pit at angleabutted by manavai supineon ahu AMS169 prone
prone
DescriptionMedium-sized complete heavily weathered moai with head pointing down slope away from Rano Raraku. Moderately well-preserved complete statue, with head orientated away from Rano Raraku. Previously excavated by Heyerdahl; hollow of excavation trench fairly visible. R. front more weathered than L. front overall. Large complete moai, moderately well preserved, head facing down road, away from Rano Raraku. Taheta in back of head. Apparent excavation trench around moai, extends c.0.8m out from base.Complete, stumpy moai with head away from Rano Raraku. Whole front quite weathered, but worse on R. sideSmall intact moai with head aligned away from Rano Raraku. Hollow to left (S) side surrounded by up cast - excavation spoil. Lying on R. front: poor visibility here.Complete and unbroken but heavily weathered moai. One of a group of three. Tilted a bit onto R. side; head away from Rano Raraku. Conspicuous wart-like inclusion on left cheek. Stones around and underneath.Intact moai, heavily weathered, lying on R. front, head away from Rano Raraku. Humanly made cavities (cupmarks) on L. arm (at least 5). Significantly more weathered on R. side than L. Usual stones underneath and around.Large moai in two pieces, broken at lower face, very well preserved. On front but tilted onto L. side. Head away from Rano Raraku. Tilting means much more of front visible than usual. Compared to front, base is unusually heavily weathered. Petroglyphs on R. chest.Large supine moai lying parallel to moai 958 but nearer the road. Head towards Rano Raraku. In two main pieces, broken at neck in transport or fall. Third piece, constituting much of chin, now resting almost in position within major crack. Underside of chin and adjacent neck have surprisingly little weathering considLarge prone moai, parallel to road, with head away from Rano Raraku. In three pieces, broken in transport or fall. Breaks in rather unusual places: one rather more than half2way down head, other well below shoulder. Some small stones underneath and around torso.Small supine moai broken at base of neck in transport or fall. Head down slope towards sea and propped on/in contact with a flow lava boulder. Torso part slightly buried. Because statue is supine impossible to ascertain original weathering patterns because now uniformly eroded.Moderately well preserved large moai, broken across face. Three taheta-like features along spine. Petroglyphs on L. side. Natural cavity on R. side. More weathered R. front. Mineral reddening between rear arms and back and on hands. Face part buried, part obscured by 68.Moderately well preserved moai broken across face. Prominent nipples. Noticeable collection of loose stones underlying statue, includes boulder sized stones.Moai in very poor state, lying on its back with head towards Rano Raraku. Most of R. side and all for back invisible because buried in thick scrub - NB this moai was NOT cleared by CONAFComplete prone moai with head orientated down slope, away from Rano Raraku. Exposed ground surface below statue covered with loose stones. Complete moai with head pointing down slope towards sea, away from Rano Raraku. Cobble-sized stones with occasional poro around base, which does not touch the groundComplete prone moai with unstructured stone spread/ pile underlying and surrounding itBroad prone moai broken across upper chin. Possible cup marks on left arm and right rear shoulderPartially visible head of ahu-type moai projecting at angle from fill of large pitComplete thick-bodied supine moai propped on/ supported by stones below its head and along its back with a manavai at its base. Multiple cup marks on its head and left sideNear complete prone ahu-type moai. Left base broken offLarge prone moai broken across its body, below the shoulders, and across its face
OrientationDeclinationAlignment direction oDate InitialsSW-NE 10º parallel at angle 23.01.13 SH, MST, FP, RDWS-N 0º at angle at angle 30.01.13 MST, RDWWSW-ENE 0º parallel at angle 30.01.13 MST, RDWSW-NE 3º parallel at angle 30.01.13 MST, RDWWSW-ENE 10º 45º at angle 30.01.13 MST, RDWSW-NE 5º parallel at angle 30.01.13 MST, RDWSW-NE 0º parallel at angle 30.01.13 MST, RDWSSW-NNE 10º parallel horizontal 30.01.13 MST, RDWNE-SW 5º parallel parallel 29.01.13 RDWSW-NE 0º parallel at angle 29.01.13 EB, SH, RDWNEE-SWW torso 8º, at right an at angle 29.01.13 SH, RDWSW-NE 5º parallel at angle 29.01.13 EB, MSTSSW-NNE 5º unknown at angle 29.01.13 SH, MSTNEE-SWW 20º parallel at angle 29.01.13 EB, RDWSW-NE 10º parallel at angle 29.01.13 SH, MSTNE-SW 30º parallel parallel 22.01.13 SH, RDW
36 0 parallel parallel 23.01.14 SH, RDW256 body -20 parallel at angle 23.01.14 SH, MST, RDW244 head & shoparallel at angle 23.01.14 SH, RDW
back front right side left side base top of headoverall condition (score 1-4; see key)loss of features 4 2 3 4 N/A N/Aweather-related damage (score 1-4; see key)gullying (rainwater etc.) 4 1 4 4 2 1stone disintegration 4 1 2 2 2 1fissures 1 1 1 2 2 1cracks 1 1 1 1 1 1fracture 1 1 1 1 1 1cavities 2 1 2 2 3 1lamination 1 1 1 2 1 1other surface features (score 1-4; see key)silica deposits 1 1 1 1 1 1salt efflorescence 1 1 1 1 1 1darkening due to humidity 1 1 2 2 1 1lichen 3 2 2 2 3 3moss 1 1 1 1 1 1vegetation 1 1 1 1 1 1loose seeds 1 1 1 1 1 1bird excrement 1 1 1 1 1 1honeycomb 1 1 1 1 1 1fire damage 1 1 1 1 1 1Livestock/human damage Y/N Locationabrasion Nsmoothed polished areas Y corner R. side back of basebroken off Ngraffiti NLocational characteristics Y/N Commentssedimentation Nmarine spray Nexposure to birds Nvunerability Nadditional comments Front hardly visiblekey 1 = none; 2 = minor <33.3% of the visible area; 3 = medium 33.3%–66.6% of the visible area; 4 = major >66.6% of the visible area. NB in the case of loss of features the score relates to the degree of damage rather than the area covered
1 = none; 2 = minor <33.3% of the visible area; 3 = medium 33.3%–66.6% of the visible area; 4 = major >66.6% of the visible area. NB in the case of loss of features the score relates to the degree of damage rather than the area covered
1 = none; 2 = minor <33.3% of the visible area; 3 = medium 33.3%–66.6% of the visible area; 4 = major >66.6% of the visible area. NB in the case of loss of features the score relates to the degree of damage rather than the area covered
back front right side left side base top of headoverall condition (score 1-4; see key)loss of features 3 2 3 3 N/A N/Aweather-related damage (score 1-4; see key)gullying (rainwater etc.) 4 3 3 3 1 1stone disintegration 3 1 1 1 1 1fissures 1 1 1 1 1 1cracks 1 1 1 1 1 1fracture 1 1 1 1 1 1cavities 2 2 2 2 3 2lamination 1 1 1 1 1 1other surface features (score 1-4; see key)silica deposits 1 2 2 1 1 1salt efflorescence 1 1 1 1 1 1darkening due to humidity 1 1 1 1 1 1lichen 2 2 2 3 3 3moss 2 1 1 1 1 1vegetation 2 1 1 1 1 1loose seeds 1 1 1 1 1 1bird excrement 1 1 1 1 1 1honeycomb 1 1 1 1 1 1fire damage 1 1 1 1 1 1Livestock/human damage Y/N Locationabrasion Nsmoothed polished areas Y R.base heavy, R. lower flank moderate, R. shoulder light, L. top of head light, L. lower ear light, L. shoulder moderate, L. upper chest moderate, all along L. arm light, L. base heavybroken off Ngraffiti NLocational characteristics Y/N Commentssedimentation Nmarine spray Nexposure to birds Nvunerability Y Fenced off, but close to present roadadditional comments * difficult to distinguish from deliberate cup marks which are certainly present. ** graqss growing out of tahita on back of head . ***attached horse hairkey 1 = none; 2 = minor <33.3% of the visible area; 3 = medium 33.3%–66.6% of the visible area; 4 = major >66.6% of the visible area. NB in the case of loss of features the score relates to the degree of damage rather than the area covered
R.base heavy, R. lower flank moderate, R. shoulder light, L. top of head light, L. lower ear light, L. shoulder moderate, L. upper chest moderate, all along L. arm light, L. base heavy
* difficult to distinguish from deliberate cup marks which are certainly present. ** graqss growing out of tahita on back of head . ***attached horse hair1 = none; 2 = minor <33.3% of the visible area; 3 = medium 33.3%–66.6% of the visible area; 4 = major >66.6% of the visible area. NB in the case of loss of features the score relates to the degree of damage rather than the area covered
R.base heavy, R. lower flank moderate, R. shoulder light, L. top of head light, L. lower ear light, L. shoulder moderate, L. upper chest moderate, all along L. arm light, L. base heavy
1 = none; 2 = minor <33.3% of the visible area; 3 = medium 33.3%–66.6% of the visible area; 4 = major >66.6% of the visible area. NB in the case of loss of features the score relates to the degree of damage rather than the area covered
back front right side left side base top of headoverall conditionloss of features 3 2 3 2 N/A N/Aweather-related damage (score 1-4; see key)gullying (rainwater etc.) 3 3 3 1 1 1stone disintegration 2 1 1 1 1 1fissures 1 1 1 1 1 1cracks 1 1 1 1 1 1fracture 1 1 1 1 1 1cavities 2 2 2 1* 1* 2lamination 1 1 1 1 1 1other surface features (score 1-4; see key)silica deposits 1 3 2 2 1 1salt efflorescence 1 1 1 1 1 1darkening due to humidity 1 1 1 1 1 1lichen 3 2 3 3 3 2moss 1 1 1 1 2 1vegetation 2** 1 1 1 1 1loose seeds 1 1 1 1 1 1bird excrement 1 1 1 1 1 1honeycomb 1 1 1 1 1 1fire damage 1 1 1 1 1 1Livestock/human damage Y/N Locationabrasion Nsmoothed polished areas Y R. front moderate, R. top of head light, all across top of head, top of L. ear heavy, all way down L. ear light***, L. shoulder and all way down left arm, L. base very heavy broken off Ngraffiti NLocational characteristics Y/N Commentssedimentation Nmarine spray Nexposure to birds Nvunerability Y Very close to road - people, animals and exhaust fumesadditional commentskey 1 = none; 2 = minor <33.3% of the visible area; 3 = medium 33.3%–66.6% of the visible area; 4 = major >66.6% of the visible area. NB in the case of loss of features the score relates to the degree of damage rather than the area covered
R. front moderate, R. top of head light, all across top of head, top of L. ear heavy, all way down L. ear light***, L. shoulder and all way down left arm, L. base very heavy
1 = none; 2 = minor <33.3% of the visible area; 3 = medium 33.3%–66.6% of the visible area; 4 = major >66.6% of the visible area. NB in the case of loss of features the score relates to the degree of damage rather than the area covered
1 = none; 2 = minor <33.3% of the visible area; 3 = medium 33.3%–66.6% of the visible area; 4 = major >66.6% of the visible area. NB in the case of loss of features the score relates to the degree of damage rather than the area covered
back front right side left side base top of headoverall conditionloss of features 4* 3 3 3 N/A N/Aweather-related damage (score 1-4; see key)gullying (rainwater etc.) 3 3 2 2 1 2stone disintegration 2 1 1 1 1 1fissures 1 1 2 1 1 1cracks 1 1 1 1 2** 1fracture 1 1 1 1 1 1cavities 2 2 3 2 2 2lamination 1 1 1 1 1 1other surface features (score 1-4; see key)silica deposits 2 3 2 2 1 2salt efflorescence 1 1 1 1 1 1darkening due to humidity 1 1 1 1 1 1lichen 2 2 2 2 2 2moss 2 2 1 1 1 2vegetation 1 1 1 1 1 1loose seeds 1 1 1 1 1 1bird excrement 1 1 1 1 1 1honeycomb 1 1 1 1 1 1fire damage 1 1 1 1 1 1Livestock/human damage Y/N Locationabrasion Nsmoothed polished areas Y R. base quite high, R. arm and shoulder moderate***, L. base quite highbroken off Ngraffiti N
Y/N Commentssedimentation Nmarine spray Nexposure to birds Nvunerability Y Theoretically fenced off, but fence brokenadditional comments * worked inclusion protrudes c. 2cm out of existing surface; **crack goes from one side of base to other but seems fairly stable; *** R. shoulder has horse hair adhering to itkey 1 = none; 2 = minor <33.3% of the visible area; 3 = medium 33.3%–66.6% of the visible area; 4 = major >66.6% of the visible area. NB in the case of loss of features the score relates to the degree of damage rather than the area covered
Locational characteristics
R. base quite high, R. arm and shoulder moderate***, L. base quite high
* worked inclusion protrudes c. 2cm out of existing surface; **crack goes from one side of base to other but seems fairly stable; *** R. shoulder has horse hair adhering to it1 = none; 2 = minor <33.3% of the visible area; 3 = medium 33.3%–66.6% of the visible area; 4 = major >66.6% of the visible area. NB in the case of loss of features the score relates to the degree of damage rather than the area covered
1 = none; 2 = minor <33.3% of the visible area; 3 = medium 33.3%–66.6% of the visible area; 4 = major >66.6% of the visible area. NB in the case of loss of features the score relates to the degree of damage rather than the area covered
back front right side left side base top of headoverall conditionloss of features 3 2 4 4 N/A N/Aweather-related damage (score 1-4; see key)gullying (rainwater etc.) 4 1 3 2 1 1stone disintegration 2 1 1 1 1 1fissures 1 1 2 1 1 1cracks 1 1 1 2 1 1fracture 1 1 1 1 1 1cavities 2 1 2 1 2 3lamination 1 1 1 2 1 1other surface features (score 1-4; see key)silica deposits 1 3 2 2 2 2salt efflorescence 1 1 1 1 1 1darkening due to humidity 1 1 1 1 1 1lichen 2 2 2 3 2 1moss 1 1 1 1 1 1vegetation 1 1 1 1 1 1loose seeds 2 1 1 1 1 1bird excrement 1 1 1 1 1 1honeycomb 1 1 1 1 1 1fire damage 1 1 1 1 1 1Livestock/human damage Y/N Locationabrasion Y Head, R. backsmoothed polished areas Y Back base middle light, L. base lightbroken off Ngraffiti NLocational characteristics Y/N Commentssedimentation N/A Excavatedmarine spray Nexposure to birds Nvunerability Y Fairly highadditional commentskey 1 = none; 2 = minor <33.3% of the visible area; 3 = medium 33.3%–66.6% of the visible area; 4 = major >66.6% of the visible area. NB in the case of loss of features the score relates to the degree of damage rather than the area covered
1 = none; 2 = minor <33.3% of the visible area; 3 = medium 33.3%–66.6% of the visible area; 4 = major >66.6% of the visible area. NB in the case of loss of features the score relates to the degree of damage rather than the area covered
1 = none; 2 = minor <33.3% of the visible area; 3 = medium 33.3%–66.6% of the visible area; 4 = major >66.6% of the visible area. NB in the case of loss of features the score relates to the degree of damage rather than the area covered
back front right side left side base top of headoverall conditionloss of features 4 2 4 3 N/A N/Aweather-related damage (score 1-4; see key)gullying (rainwater etc.) 4 3 2 2 1 2stone disintegration 2 1 1 1 1 1fissures 1 1 1 1 2 1cracks 2 2* 2 1 2 1fracture 1 2 1 1 1 1cavities 2 2 2 2 2 3lamination 1 2 2 1 1 1other surface features (score 1-4; see key)silica deposits 1 3 2 1 1 1salt efflorescence 1 1 1 1 1 1darkening due to humidity 1 1** 2 1 1** 1lichen 3 2 2 3 2 2moss 3 1 2 2 1 2vegetation 1 1 1 1 1 1loose seeds 2 1 1 1 1 1bird excrement 1 1 1 1 1 1honeycomb 1 1 1 1 1 1fire damage 1 1** 1 1 1** 1Livestock/human damage Y/N Locationabrasion Nsmoothed polished areas Y R. base heavy, R. shoulder heavy, middle back of head, L. base heavybroken off NgraffitiLocational characteristics Y/N Commentssedimentation Nmarine spray Nexposure to birds Nvunerability Y To animals and peopleadditional comments * crack from shoulder to armpit - danger of imminent collpase. ** dark soot-like patches to front centre of base and stomach/chest - possibly soot-soaking but no other evidence of firekey 1 = none; 2 = minor <33.3% of the visible area; 3 = medium 33.3%–66.6% of the visible area; 4 = major >66.6% of the visible area. NB in the case of loss of features the score relates to the degree of damage rather than the area covered
R. base heavy, R. shoulder heavy, middle back of head, L. base heavy
* crack from shoulder to armpit - danger of imminent collpase. ** dark soot-like patches to front centre of base and stomach/chest - possibly soot-soaking but no other evidence of fire1 = none; 2 = minor <33.3% of the visible area; 3 = medium 33.3%–66.6% of the visible area; 4 = major >66.6% of the visible area. NB in the case of loss of features the score relates to the degree of damage rather than the area covered
* crack from shoulder to armpit - danger of imminent collpase. ** dark soot-like patches to front centre of base and stomach/chest - possibly soot-soaking but no other evidence of fire1 = none; 2 = minor <33.3% of the visible area; 3 = medium 33.3%–66.6% of the visible area; 4 = major >66.6% of the visible area. NB in the case of loss of features the score relates to the degree of damage rather than the area covered
back front right side left side base top of headoverall conditionloss of features 3 3* 4 2 N/A N/Aweather-related damage (score 1-4; see key)gullying (rainwater etc.) 4 3 3 2 1 1stone disintegration 2 1 1 1 1 1fissures 1 2 1 1 1 1cracks 1 2 1 1 1 1fracture 1 1 1 1 1 1cavities 2 2 2 1 1 2lamination 2 1 2 1 1 1other surface features (score 1-4; see key)silica deposits 1 3 2 1 2 1salt efflorescence 1 1 1 1 1 1darkening due to humidity 1 1 1 1 1 1lichen 2 2 2 3 3 2moss 2 1 2 1 1 1vegetation 1 1 1 1 1 1loose seeds 2 1 1 1 1 1bird excrement 2 1 1 1 1 1honeycomb 1 1 1 1 1 1fire damage 1 1 1 1 1 1Livestock/human damage Y/N Locationabrasion Nsmoothed polished areas Y R. base lightbroken off Ngraffiti NLocational characteristics Y/N Commentssedimentation Nmarine spray Nexposure to birds Nvunerability Y Now high, due to clearanceadditional comments * L. side really = 2, R. side 3-4; orange ? silica deposit on basekey 1 = none; 2 = minor <33.3% of the visible area; 3 = medium 33.3%–66.6% of the visible area; 4 = major >66.6% of the visible area. NB in the case of loss of features the score relates to the degree of damage rather than the area covered
1 = none; 2 = minor <33.3% of the visible area; 3 = medium 33.3%–66.6% of the visible area; 4 = major >66.6% of the visible area. NB in the case of loss of features the score relates to the degree of damage rather than the area covered
1 = none; 2 = minor <33.3% of the visible area; 3 = medium 33.3%–66.6% of the visible area; 4 = major >66.6% of the visible area. NB in the case of loss of features the score relates to the degree of damage rather than the area covered
back front right side left side base top of headoverall conditionloss of features 2 1 3 2 N/A N/Aweather-related damage (score 1-4; see key)gullying (rainwater etc.) 2 1 2 1 3 1stone disintegration 1 1 1 1 1 1fissures 1 1 1 1 1 1cracks 1 1 1 1 1 1fracture 1 1 1 1 1 1cavities 2 2 2 2 2 2lamination 1 2 2 2 1 1other surface features (score 1-4; see key)silica deposits 1 2 1 2 1 1salt efflorescence 1 1 1 1 1 1darkening due to humidity 1 1 1 1 1 1lichen 2 2 2 2 3 2moss 2 1 1 1 1 1vegetation 2 1 1 1 1 1loose seeds 2 1 1 1 1 1bird excrement 1 1 1 1 1 1honeycomb 1 2* 1 1 1 1fire damage 1 1 1 1 1 1Livestock/human damage Y/N Locationabrasion Nsmoothed polished areas Y R. base heavy, lower R. arm moderate, R. upper chest, L. base heavybroken off Ngraffiti NLocational characteristics Y/N Commentssedimentation Nmarine spray Nexposure to birds Nvunerability Y Now high, due to clearanceadditional comments * most of honeycomb (c.80%) is blackened - possible sootingkey 1 = none; 2 = minor <33.3% of the visible area; 3 = medium 33.3%–66.6% of the visible area; 4 = major >66.6% of the visible area. NB in the case of loss of features the score relates to the degree of damage rather than the area covered
R. base heavy, lower R. arm moderate, R. upper chest, L. base heavy
1 = none; 2 = minor <33.3% of the visible area; 3 = medium 33.3%–66.6% of the visible area; 4 = major >66.6% of the visible area. NB in the case of loss of features the score relates to the degree of damage rather than the area covered
1 = none; 2 = minor <33.3% of the visible area; 3 = medium 33.3%–66.6% of the visible area; 4 = major >66.6% of the visible area. NB in the case of loss of features the score relates to the degree of damage rather than the area covered
back front right side left side base top of headoverall conditionloss of features 3* 4 3 3 N/A N/Aweather-related damage (score 1-4; see key)gullying (rainwater etc.) 2 4 3 2 1 1stone disintegration 1 2 1 1 1 1fissures 2 1 2 2 2 1cracks 1 1 1 1 1 1fracture 1 1 1 1 1 2**cavities 2 2 2 2 2 1lamination 1 1 1 1 1 1other surface features (score 1-4; see key)silica deposits 4 2 2 2 2 3salt efflorescence 1 1 1 1 1 1darkening due to humidity 1 1 1 1 1 1lichen 1 2 2 3 2 2moss 1 1 1 1 1 1vegetation 1 1 1 1 1 1loose seeds 1 1 1 1 1 1bird excrement 1 1 1 1 1 1honeycomb 1 1 1 1 1 1fire damage 1 1 1 1 1 1Livestock/human damage Y/N Locationabrasion Nsmoothed polished areas Y R. basebroken off ?**graffiti NLocational characteristics Y/N Commentssedimentation Nmarine spray Nexposure to birds Nvunerability Y scrub might have deterred people, but now cleared and new kerb is not adequate to deter either people or animalsadditional comments * only a very small area of the back is visible; **piece missing from R. top of head, nearly semicircular in profile, c.0.2 across, 0.08 deep, runs from front of head probably to back - possibly deliberate damagekey 1 = none; 2 = minor <33.3% of the visible area; 3 = medium 33.3%–66.6% of the visible area; 4 = major >66.6% of the visible area. NB in the case of loss of features the score relates to the degree of damage rather than the area covered
scrub might have deterred people, but now cleared and new kerb is not adequate to deter either people or animals* only a very small area of the back is visible; **piece missing from R. top of head, nearly semicircular in profile, c.0.2 across, 0.08 deep, runs from front of head probably to back - possibly deliberate damage1 = none; 2 = minor <33.3% of the visible area; 3 = medium 33.3%–66.6% of the visible area; 4 = major >66.6% of the visible area. NB in the case of loss of features the score relates to the degree of damage rather than the area covered
* only a very small area of the back is visible; **piece missing from R. top of head, nearly semicircular in profile, c.0.2 across, 0.08 deep, runs from front of head probably to back - possibly deliberate damage1 = none; 2 = minor <33.3% of the visible area; 3 = medium 33.3%–66.6% of the visible area; 4 = major >66.6% of the visible area. NB in the case of loss of features the score relates to the degree of damage rather than the area covered
back front right side left side base top of headoverall conditionloss of features 4 3 4 3 N/A N/Aweather-related damage (score 1-4; see key)gullying (rainwater etc.) 4 2 2 2 2 N/A*stone disintegration 2 1 1 1 1 N/Afissures 1 1 2 2 2 N/Acracks 1 1 2 1 1 N/Afracture 1 1 1 1 1 N/Acavities 2 1 2 2 2 N/Alamination 1 1 1 1 1 N/Aother surface features (score 1-4; see key)silica deposits 1 4 2 3 2 N/Asalt efflorescence 1 1 1 1 1 N/Adarkening due to humidity 1 1 1 1 1 N/Alichen 3 3 2 2 3 N/Amoss 1 1 1 1 1 N/Avegetation 1 1 1 1 1 N/Aloose seeds 1 1 1 1 1 N/Abird excrement 1 1 1 1 1 N/Ahoneycomb 1 1 1 1 1 N/Afire damage 1 1 1 1 1 N/ALivestock/human damage Y/N Locationabrasion Nsmoothed polished areas Y R. base light, L. base heavybroken off Ngraffiti NLocational characteristics Y/N Commentssedimentation Y Head slightly buried by hillwashmarine spray Nexposure to birds Nvunerability Y scrub might have deterred people, but now cleared and new kerb is not adequate to deter either people or animalsadditional comments *top of head is almost invisible because eof combination of burial by sedimentation and erosionkey 1 = none; 2 = minor <33.3% of the visible area; 3 = medium 33.3%–66.6% of the visible area; 4 = major >66.6% of the visible area. NB in the case of loss of features the score relates to the degree of damage rather than the area covered
scrub might have deterred people, but now cleared and new kerb is not adequate to deter either people or animals*top of head is almost invisible because eof combination of burial by sedimentation and erosion
1 = none; 2 = minor <33.3% of the visible area; 3 = medium 33.3%–66.6% of the visible area; 4 = major >66.6% of the visible area. NB in the case of loss of features the score relates to the degree of damage rather than the area covered
1 = none; 2 = minor <33.3% of the visible area; 3 = medium 33.3%–66.6% of the visible area; 4 = major >66.6% of the visible area. NB in the case of loss of features the score relates to the degree of damage rather than the area covered
back front right side left side base top of headoverall conditionloss of features 3* 3 4 4 N/A N/Aweather-related damage (score 1-4; see key)gullying (rainwater etc.) 2 3 2 2 1 2stone disintegration 1 2 1 1 1 1fissures 1 2 2 3 1 1cracks 2 1 1 1 1 2fracture 1 1 1 1 1 1cavities 2 2 2 2 1 2lamination 1 2 2 2 1 1other surface features (score 1-4; see key)silica deposits 4 1 2 2 3 2salt efflorescence 1 1 1 1 1 1darkening due to humidity 2 1 1 1 1 2lichen 1 3 2 2 1 2moss 1 1 1 1 1 3vegetation 1 1 1 1 1 1loose seeds 1 1 1 1 1 1bird excrement 1 2 1 2 1 1honeycomb 1 1 1 1 1 1fire damage 1 1 1 1 1 1Livestock/human damage Y/N Locationabrasion Nsmoothed polished areas Y L. shoulder, L. jawbroken off Y L. lower body - hole, looks artificial, c.0.05m acrossgraffiti NLocational characteristics Y/N Commentssedimentation Y downslope wash onto lower L. side of torso and minor amount on R. side of torsomarine spray Nexposure to birds Nvunerability Y scrub might have deterred people, but now cleared and new kerb is not adequate to deter either people or animalsadditional comments *only very small area of back visiblekey 1 = none; 2 = minor <33.3% of the visible area; 3 = medium 33.3%–66.6% of the visible area; 4 = major >66.6% of the visible area. NB in the case of loss of features the score relates to the degree of damage rather than the area covered
downslope wash onto lower L. side of torso and minor amount on R. side of torso
scrub might have deterred people, but now cleared and new kerb is not adequate to deter either people or animals
1 = none; 2 = minor <33.3% of the visible area; 3 = medium 33.3%–66.6% of the visible area; 4 = major >66.6% of the visible area. NB in the case of loss of features the score relates to the degree of damage rather than the area covered
1 = none; 2 = minor <33.3% of the visible area; 3 = medium 33.3%–66.6% of the visible area; 4 = major >66.6% of the visible area. NB in the case of loss of features the score relates to the degree of damage rather than the area covered
back front right side left side base top of headoverall conditionloss of features 3 2 3 3 N/A N/Aweather-related damage (score 1-4; see key)gullying (rainwater etc.) 4 2 3 3 2 3stone disintegration 2 1 1 2 1 1fissures 2 1 1 2 1 1cracks 1 1 1 1 1 1fracture 1 1 1 1 1 1cavities 2 2 2 3 3 3lamination 2 1 1 2 1 1other surface features (score 1-4; see key)silica deposits 1 2 2 1 1 2salt efflorescence 1 1 1 1 1 1darkening due to humidity 1 1 1 1 1 1lichen 2 2 3 3 3 2moss 1 1 1 1 1 2vegetation 1 1 1 1 1 1loose seeds 2 1 1 1 1 1bird excrement 1 1 1 1 1 1honeycomb 1 1 1 1 1 1fire damage 1 1 1 1* 1 1Livestock/human damage Y/N Locationabrasion Nsmoothed polished areas Y R. base, R. arm, R. shoulder, L. shoulder, L. arm, L. base, basebroken off Ngraffiti NLocational characteristics Y/N Commentssedimentation Nmarine spray Nexposure to birds Nvunerability Y Open to horses ande humansadditional comments * mineral reddening in general description might indicate burning key 1 = none; 2 = minor <33.3% of the visible area; 3 = medium 33.3%–66.6% of the visible area; 4 = major >66.6% of the visible area. NB in the case of loss of features the score relates to the degree of damage rather than the area covered
1 = none; 2 = minor <33.3% of the visible area; 3 = medium 33.3%–66.6% of the visible area; 4 = major >66.6% of the visible area. NB in the case of loss of features the score relates to the degree of damage rather than the area covered
1 = none; 2 = minor <33.3% of the visible area; 3 = medium 33.3%–66.6% of the visible area; 4 = major >66.6% of the visible area. NB in the case of loss of features the score relates to the degree of damage rather than the area covered
back front right side left side base top of headoverall conditionloss of features 3 2 3 2 N/A N/Aweather-related damage (score 1-4; see key)gullying (rainwater etc.) 3 3 3 2 1 1stone disintegration 2 1 1 1 1 1fissures 2 1 2 1 1 1cracks 1 1 1 1 2 1fracture 1 1 1 2 1 1cavities 2 2 2 2 2 1lamination 1 2 1 1 1 1other surface features (score 1-4; see key)silica deposits 1 3 2 1 1 3salt efflorescence 1 1 1 1 1 1darkening due to humidity 1 1 1 1 1 2lichen 3 2 2 3 3 1moss 1 1 1 1 1 2vegetation 1 1 1 1 1 1loose seeds 1 1 1 1 1 1bird excrement 1 1 1 1 1 1honeycomb 1 1 1 1 1 1fire damage 1 1 1 1 1 1Livestock/human damage Y/N LocationabrasIon Nsmoothed polished areas Y R. back, R. shoulder, R. ear lobe, L. ear lobe, L. jaw, L. shoulder, L. basebroken off Ngraffiti NLocational characteristics Y/N Commentssedimentation Nmarine spray Nexposure to birds Nvunerability Y No fence, already has a lot of animal rubbing. Horse bones nearby. Wire fence is down.additional commentskey 1 = none; 2 = minor <33.3% of the visible area; 3 = medium 33.3%–66.6% of the visible area; 4 = major >66.6% of the visible area. NB in the case of loss of features the score relates to the degree of damage rather than the area covered
R. back, R. shoulder, R. ear lobe, L. ear lobe, L. jaw, L. shoulder, L. base
No fence, already has a lot of animal rubbing. Horse bones nearby. Wire fence is down.
1 = none; 2 = minor <33.3% of the visible area; 3 = medium 33.3%–66.6% of the visible area; 4 = major >66.6% of the visible area. NB in the case of loss of features the score relates to the degree of damage rather than the area covered
1 = none; 2 = minor <33.3% of the visible area; 3 = medium 33.3%–66.6% of the visible area; 4 = major >66.6% of the visible area. NB in the case of loss of features the score relates to the degree of damage rather than the area covered
back front right side left side base top of headoverall conditionloss of features N/A 4 3* 3 N/A N/Aweather-related damage (score 1-4; see key)gullying (rainwater etc.) N/A 4 2 3 3 1stone disintegration N/A 2 2 2 2 1fissures N/A 2 2 1 2 1cracks N/A 1 1 1 1 1fracture N/A 1 1 1 1 1cavities N/A 3 3 2 2 2lamination N/A 1 1 1 1 1other surface features (score 1-4; see key)silica deposits N/A 1 2 1 3 1salt efflorescence N/A 1 1 1 1 1darkening due to humidity N/A 1 2 1 2 2lichen N/A 2 2 2 2 2moss N/A 1 1 1 1 1vegetation N/A 2** 1 1 1 1loose seeds N/A 1 1 1 1 1bird excrement N/A 1 1 1 1 1honeycomb N/A 1 1 1 1 1fire damage N/A 1 1 1 1 1Livestock/human damage Y/N Locationabrasion Nsmoothed polished areas Nbroken off Y L. side of base and possibly elsewheregraffiti NLocational characteristics Y/N Commentssedimentation ? Can't tell because of vegetationmarine spray Nexposure to birds Nvunerability N already in very bad state and currently protected from people by scrubadditional comments * all observations apply only to lower part of R. side (rest invisible); ** substantial bush growing in gap below eyeskey 1 = none; 2 = minor <33.3% of the visible area; 3 = medium 33.3%–66.6% of the visible area; 4 = major >66.6% of the visible area. NB in the case of loss of features the score relates to the degree of damage rather than the area covered
already in very bad state and currently protected from people by scrub* all observations apply only to lower part of R. side (rest invisible); ** substantial bush growing in gap below eyes1 = none; 2 = minor <33.3% of the visible area; 3 = medium 33.3%–66.6% of the visible area; 4 = major >66.6% of the visible area. NB in the case of loss of features the score relates to the degree of damage rather than the area covered
1 = none; 2 = minor <33.3% of the visible area; 3 = medium 33.3%–66.6% of the visible area; 4 = major >66.6% of the visible area. NB in the case of loss of features the score relates to the degree of damage rather than the area covered
back front right side left side base top of headoverall conditionloss of features 3 2 2 2 N/A N/A
gullying (rainwater etc.) 4 3 2 2 1 1stone disintegration 2 1 1 1 1 1fissures 2 1 1 2 2 1cracks 1 1 1 1 1 1fracture 1 1 1 1 1 1cavities 2 2 3 2 2 1lamination 1 2 1 1 2 1other surface features (score 1-4; see key)silica deposits 1 3 1 1 1 1salt efflorescence 1 1 1 1 1 1darkening due to humidity 1 2* 1 1 1 1lichen 2 2 3 3 3 2moss 1 1 1 1 1 1vegetation 1 1 1 1 1 1loose seeds 2 1 1 1 1 1bird excrement 2 1 1 1 1 1honeycomb 1 1 1 1 1 1fire damage 1 1 1 1 1 1Livestock/human damage Y/N Locationabrasion Nsmoothed polished areas Y R. base, L. base, L. head, L. breastbroken off Ngraffiti NLocational characteristics Y/N Commentssedimentation Nmarine spray Y Slight possibilty when windyexposure to birds Nvunerability Y Not fenced off; animal damage already apparentadditional comments * possible darkening due to humidity around eyeskey 1 = none; 2 = minor <33.3% of the visible area; 3 = medium 33.3%–66.6% of the visible area; 4 = major >66.6% of the visible area. NB in the case of loss of features the score relates to the degree of damage rather than the area covered
weather-related damage (score 1-4; see key)
1 = none; 2 = minor <33.3% of the visible area; 3 = medium 33.3%–66.6% of the visible area; 4 = major >66.6% of the visible area. NB in the case of loss of features the score relates to the degree of damage rather than the area covered
1 = none; 2 = minor <33.3% of the visible area; 3 = medium 33.3%–66.6% of the visible area; 4 = major >66.6% of the visible area. NB in the case of loss of features the score relates to the degree of damage rather than the area covered
back front right side left side base top of headoverall conditionloss of features 4 3 4 3 N/A N/A
gullying (rainwater etc.) 4 3 2 3 1 1stone disintegration 2 1 2 2 2 2fissures 2 1 2 1 2 1cracks 1 1 2 1 2 1fracture 1 1 1 1 1 1cavities 2 2 2 2 2 3lamination 1 1 2 2 1 2other surface features (score 1-4; see key)silica deposits 1 3 1 1 1 1salt efflorescence 1 1 1 1 1 1darkening due to humidity 1 1 2 1 1 1lichen 1 1 2 3 2 3moss 1 1 1 1 1 1vegetation 1 1 1 1 1 1loose seeds 1 1 1 1 1 1bird excrement 2 1 1 1 1 1honeycomb 1 1 1 1 1 1fire damage 1 1 1 1 1 1Livestock/human damage Y/N Locationabrasion Nsmoothed polished areas Y L. base heavybroken off Y R. base, R. front basegraffiti NLocational characteristics Y/N Commentssedimentation Nmarine spray Y No obvious damageexposure to birds Nvunerability Y Near road and tourists but protected by fence. Close to sea and road, so vulnerable to marine spray and vehicle exhaust.additional comments * possible darkening due to humidity around eyeskey 1 = none; 2 = minor <33.3% of the visible area; 3 = medium 33.3%–66.6% of the visible area; 4 = major >66.6% of the visible area. NB in the case of loss of features the score relates to the degree of damage rather than the area covered
weather-related damage (score 1-4; see key)
Near road and tourists but protected by fence. Close to sea and road, so vulnerable to marine spray and vehicle exhaust.
1 = none; 2 = minor <33.3% of the visible area; 3 = medium 33.3%–66.6% of the visible area; 4 = major >66.6% of the visible area. NB in the case of loss of features the score relates to the degree of damage rather than the area covered
1 = none; 2 = minor <33.3% of the visible area; 3 = medium 33.3%–66.6% of the visible area; 4 = major >66.6% of the visible area. NB in the case of loss of features the score relates to the degree of damage rather than the area covered
back front right side left side base top of headoverall conditionloss of features 4 2 4 3 2 3
gullying (rainwater etc.) 4 2 2 2 2 2stone disintegration 4 1 1 1 1 1fissures 1 1 1 1 1 1cracks 1 1 1 1 1 1fracture 1 1 1 1 1 1cavities 1 2 2 2 2 2lamination 1 1 1 1 1 1other surface features (score 1-4; see key)silica deposits 1 3 1 1 1 1salt efflorescence 1 1 1 1 1 1darkening due to humidity 1 1 1 1 1 1lichen 2 2 3 3 3 2moss 1 1 1 1 1 1vegetation 1 1 1 1 1 1loose seeds 1 1 1 1 1 1bird excrement 2 1 1 1 1 1honeycomb 1 1 1 1 1 1fire damage 1 1 1 1 1 1Livestock/human damage Y/N Locationabrasion Nsmoothed polished areas Y head; L. shoulder; L. base (corner)*broken off Ngraffiti MLocational characteristics Y/N Commentssedimentation Nmarine spray Y Low exposureexposure to birds Yvunerability 3 Near to and easily accessible from road. Extant fence broken sinceat least January 2013additional comments *horse hair adhering to moai; adjacent stone pile/ spread has kept animals clear of moai, protecting it from abrasionkey 1 = none; 2 = minor <33.3% of the visible area; 3 = medium 33.3%–66.6% of the visible area; 4 = major >66.6% of the visible area. NB in the case of loss of features the score relates to the degree of damage rather than the area covered
weather-related damage (score 1-4; see key)
Near to and easily accessible from road. Extant fence broken sinceat least January 2013*horse hair adhering to moai; adjacent stone pile/ spread has kept animals clear of moai, protecting it from abrasion1 = none; 2 = minor <33.3% of the visible area; 3 = medium 33.3%–66.6% of the visible area; 4 = major >66.6% of the visible area. NB in the case of loss of features the score relates to the degree of damage rather than the area covered
1 = none; 2 = minor <33.3% of the visible area; 3 = medium 33.3%–66.6% of the visible area; 4 = major >66.6% of the visible area. NB in the case of loss of features the score relates to the degree of damage rather than the area covered
back front right side left side base top of headoverall conditionloss of features 3 3 3 2 2 2
gullying (rainwater etc.) 3 2 3 2 1 1stone disintegration 2 1 1 1 1 1fissures 1 1 1 1 1 1cracks 1 1 1 1 1 1fracture 1 1 1 1 1 1cavities 2 3 1 2 1 2lamination 1 1 1 1 1 1other surface features (score 1-4; see kesilica deposits 1 3 1 1 1 2salt efflorescence 1 1 1 1 1 1darkening due to humidity 1 2 1 1 1 1lichen 2 2 3 3 2 2moss 1 1 1 1 1 1vegetation 2 1 1 1 1 1loose seeds 1 1 1 1 1 1bird excrement 2 1 1 1 1 1honeycomb 1 1 1 1 1 1fire damage 1 1 1 1 1 1Livestock/human damage Y/N Locationabrasion Nsmoothed polished areas Y L. shoulderbroken off Ngraffiti NLocational characteristics Y/N Commentssedimentation Nmarine spray Y Low exposureexposure to birds Yvunerability Y Near to and easily accessible from road. Extant fence broken sinceat least January 2013additional comments Exposed human remains below moai and surface artefacts nearbykey 1 = none; 2 = minor <33.3% of the visible area; 3 = medium 33.3%
weather-related damage (score 1-4; see key)
Near to and easily accessible from road. Extant fence broken sinceat least January 2013
back front right side left side base top of headoverall conditionloss of features 4 2 4 4 N/A 3
gullying (rainwater etc.) 2 1 1 1 N/A 2stone disintegration 2 1 1 1 N/A 1fissures 1 1 1 1 N/A 1cracks 1 1 1 1 N/A 1fracture 1 1 1 1 N/A 1cavities 3 3 3 3 N/A 2lamination 1 1 1 1 N/A 1other surface features (score 1-4; see kesilica deposits 1 2 1 1 N/A 1salt efflorescence 1 1 1 1 N/A 1darkening due to humidity 1 1 1 1 N/A 1lichen 2 2 2 3 N/A 1moss 1 1 1 1 N/A 1vegetation 1 1 1 1 N/A 1loose seeds 1 1 1 1 N/A 1bird excrement 2 1 1 1 N/A 1honeycomb 1 1 1 1 N/A 1fire damage 1 1 1 1 N/A 1Livestock/human damage Y/N Locationabrasion Nsmoothed polished areas Nbroken off Ngraffiti NLocational characteristics Y/N Commentssedimentation N No active sedimentation but the pit from which AMS122 projects will be a sediment trapmarine spray Nexposure to birds Yvunerability Y Unenclosedadditional comments Possibly excavated by Routledgekey 1 = none; 2 = minor <33.3% of the visible area; 3 = medium 33.3%
weather-related damage (score 1-4; see key)
No active sedimentation but the pit from which AMS122 projects will be a sediment trap
back front right side left side base top of headoverall conditionloss of features 2 3 3 3 2 2
gullying (rainwater etc.) 3 3 2 2 1 1stone disintegration 1 2 1 1 1 1fissures 1 1 1 1 1 1cracks 1 1 1 1 1 1fracture 1 1 1 1 1 1cavities 2 1 1 2 1 1lamination 1 1 1 2 1 1other surface features (score 1-4; see kesilica deposits 3 1 1 2 2 2salt efflorescence 1 1 1 1 1 1darkening due to humidity 1 1 1 1 1 1lichen 2 2 2 3 3 3moss 1 1 1 1 1 1vegetation 1 1 1 1 1 1loose seeds 1 1 1 1 1 1bird excrement 1 2 1 1 1 1honeycomb 1 1 1 1 1 1fire damage 1 1 1 1 1 1Livestock/human damage Y/N Locationabrasion Nsmoothed polished areas Y R. top of head; R. ear; R. rear jaw; R. upper shoulder; L. upper shoulder; left ear; L. top of headbroken off Ngraffiti NLocational characteristics Y/N Commentssedimentation Y vulnearable but not obviously subject to sedimentation from slope above marine spray Nexposure to birds Yvunerability Y unenclosedadditional comments Photographed in Routledgekey 1 = none; 2 = minor <33.3% of the visible area; 3 = medium 33.3%
weather-related damage (score 1-4; see key)
R. top of head; R. ear; R. rear jaw; R. upper shoulder; L. upper shoulder; left ear; L. top of head
vulnearable but not obviously subject to sedimentation from slope above
back front right side left side base top of headoverall conditionloss of features 3 3 3 3 3 2
gullying (rainwater etc.) 3 2 1 2 1 1stone disintegration 2 1 1 1 1 1fissures 1 1 1 1 1 2cracks 1 1 1 1 1 1fracture 1 1 1 1 1 1cavities 2 3 2 2 1 2lamination 1 1 1 1 1 1other surface features (score 1-4; see kesilica deposits 1 2 2 1 1 1salt efflorescence 1 1 1 1 1 1darkening due to humidity 1 1 1 1 1 1lichen 2 2 2 3 2 2moss 1 1 1 1 1 1vegetation 1 1 1 1 1 1loose seeds 1 1 1 1 1 1bird excrement 2 1 1 1 2 1honeycomb 1 1 1 1 1 1fire damage 1 1 1 1 1 1Livestock/human damage Y/N Locationabrasion Nsmoothed polished areas Y R. upper ear; L. base (edge of break); R. base; R. lower body; R. arm & shoulder; L. top of head; L. upper ear broken off N*graffiti NLocational characteristics Y/N Commentssedimentation Nmarine spray Nexposure to birds Yvunerability Y unenclosedadditional comments *large fragment broken off base is not recentkey 1 = none; 2 = minor <33.3% of the visible area; 3 = medium 33.3%
weather-related damage (score 1-4; see key)
R. upper ear; L. base (edge of break); R. base; R. lower body; R. arm & shoulder; L. top of head; L. upper ear
back front right side left side base top of headoverall conditionloss of features 4 2 3 2 2 2
gullying (rainwater etc.) 4 2 3 2 1 2stone disintegration 2 1 1 1 1 1fissures 2 1 2 1 2 1cracks 1 1 1 2 1 1fracture 1 1 1 1 1 1cavities 2 2 2 1 1 2lamination 2 1 1 2 1 1other surface features (score 1-4; see kesilica deposits 1 3 1 1 1 1salt efflorescence 1 1 1 1 1 1darkening due to humidity 1 1 1 1 1 1lichen 2 2 2 3 2 2moss 1 1 1 1 1 1vegetation 1 1 1 1 1 1loose seeds 1 1 1 1 1 1bird excrement 1 1 1 1 1 1honeycomb 1 1 1 1 1 1fire damage 1 1 1 1 1 1Livestock/human damage Y/N Locationabrasion Nsmoothed polished areas Y L. upper ear; L. lower ear; edge of break through face; L. lower jaw; L. upper chest; L. lower arm; L. & R. base; R. middle arm; R. upper shoulderbroken off Ngraffiti NLocational characteristics Y/N Commentssedimentation Nmarine spray Nexposure to birds Yvunerability Y Unenclosed and clearly very vulnerable to animal rubbingadditional comments Unusually high incidence of fissuring and crackingkey 1 = none; 2 = minor <33.3% of the visible area; 3 = medium 33.3%
weather-related damage (score 1-4; see key)
L. upper ear; L. lower ear; edge of break through face; L. lower jaw; L. upper chest; L. lower arm; L. & R. base; R. middle arm; R. upper shoulder
