Date post: | 06-Feb-2023 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | khangminh22 |
View: | 0 times |
Download: | 0 times |
V L A D I M Í R K U Č E R A , T O M Á Š V Y H L Í D A L , M A R T I N H R O M Č Í K
D E P A R T M E N T O F I N S T R U M E N T A T I O N A N D C O N T R O L E N G I N E E R I N G , F M E
A N D
D E P A R T M E N T O F C O N T R O L E N G I N E E R I N G , F E E
Summary of recent results on design and application of signal shapers
Contain
Basics of signal shapers
Classical approach and design
Spectral feature of shaper with distributed delay
Distributed delay based shaper
Design and spectral feature
Robustness
Application examples
Case study of blended wing body aircraft
Portal crane
Flexible link
ZV shaper
𝐺 𝑠 =𝜔2
𝑠2+2𝜉𝜔𝑠+𝜔2
𝑉 𝜉,𝜔 = 𝑒−𝜉𝜔𝑡𝑖 𝐶 𝜉,𝜔 2 + 𝑆 𝜉,𝜔 2
𝐶 𝜉,𝜔 = 𝐴𝑖𝑒𝜉𝜔𝑡𝑖cos(𝜔 1 − 𝜉2𝑡𝑖)
𝑛
𝑖=0
S 𝜉, 𝜔 = 𝐴𝑖𝑒𝜉𝜔𝑡𝑖sin(𝜔 1 − 𝜉2𝑡𝑖)
𝑛𝑖=0
𝐴𝑖𝑡𝑖=
1
1+𝐾
𝐾
1+𝐾
0𝑇𝑑
2
, 𝐴𝑖 > 0, 𝐴𝑖 = 1𝑛𝑖=1
𝐾 = 𝑒−𝜉𝜋
1−𝜉
*
t(s) t(s) t(s)
r(t) sr(t)
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 10
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
t [s]
Am
plitu
da [-
]
Přechodová charakteristika Posicastu
Systém druhého řádu
Reference
Posicast a systém druhého řádu
ZV ZV
Convolution with reference command Convolution with reference command
𝑣 𝑡 = 𝐴𝑖𝑤(𝑡 − 𝑡𝑖)
𝑁
𝑖=1
Multi modal shapers
𝑍𝑉 𝑠 = A + 1 − 𝐴 e−st
𝑍𝑉𝐷 𝑠 = 𝑍𝑉 𝑠 ∗ 𝑍𝑉(𝑠)
𝐸𝐼 𝑠 = 𝑍𝑉1 𝑠 ∗ 𝑍𝑉2(𝑠)
Dominant Zeros of time delay system
Dominant Zeros of time delay system
𝑠𝑘 = −1
𝜏ln𝐴
1 − 𝐴± 𝑗𝜋
𝜏2𝑘 + 1 , 𝑘 = 0
Zeros of shapers Zeros of shapers
Robustness of Multimodal shapers
SensitivityfunctionFromequationV ξ, ω SensitivityfunctionFromequationV ξ, ω
Spectral feature
𝑆𝑍𝑉 = 𝐴 + 1 − 𝐴 𝑒−𝑠𝜏
𝑠𝑘 = −1
𝜏ln𝐴
1 − 𝐴± 𝑗𝜋
𝜏2𝑘 + 1 , 𝑘 = 0,1, … ,∞
Spectral feature of ZVD with non−commensurable delays Spectral feature of ZVD with non−commensurable delays
DZV shaper
𝐵𝜗𝑠 + 1 − 𝐵 1 − 𝑒−𝑠𝜗 = 0
𝑆𝐷𝑍𝑉 𝑠 = 𝐵 + 1 − 𝐵1−𝑒−𝑠𝜗
𝑠𝜗=𝐵𝜗+(1−𝐵)(1−𝑒−𝑠𝜗)
𝑠𝜗
𝑤ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒𝐵 ∈ 𝑅+, B<1
Characteristic Equation
Zeros 𝑠 −𝑘,𝑘 of Characteristic Eq. can be evaluate numerricaly or via the Lambert
W function
−𝛽 ± 𝑗Ω =1
𝜗(𝑊 1,
1 − 𝐵
𝐵𝑒1−𝐵𝐵 −
1 − 𝐵
𝐵)
𝝑 from 1st. nonzero root of 𝑩 from
Ω𝑒𝛽𝜗 − 𝛽𝑠𝑖𝑛Ω𝜗- Ωcos Ω𝜗 = 0 𝐵 =1−𝑒−𝛽𝜗cosΩ𝜗
𝛽−1+𝑒−𝛽𝜗cosΩ𝜗
Spectral feature DZV
𝑠 −𝑘,𝑘 = −1
𝜗𝑙𝑛𝐵3
2+2 𝑘−1 𝜋
1−𝐵± 𝑗
3
2+ 2 𝑘 − 1
𝜋
𝜗, 𝑘 = 1,2, . . , ∞
ZerosofDZVshaper ZerosofDZVshaper
Spectral feature DZV
Spectral feature of DZVD with non−commensurable delays Spectral feature of DZVD with non−commensurable delays
ACFA 2020
Design plant
G=Act*Aircraft*Sen
Total of 36 states
Feedback: robust H_inf
fixed, low order (3) controller
CMD shaped by ZV shaper
ZV as CMD filter ZV as CMD filter
ACFA 2020
First and second bending mode compensation OL
Mag
nitud
e (
dB
)
Bode Diagram
Frequency (rad/sec)
Step Response
Time (sec)
Am
plitu
de
Nz law lateral Nz law lateral Modal sensors of NZ law Modal sensors of NZ law
Flexible link
The Quanser Inc. laboratory experiment
Position - angle of the table - is measured and
Actuated by feedback servo (designed again using
the mixedsensitivity H∞ approach
Shaped references Shaped references
Flexible link results
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5
-0.8
-0.4
-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.8
Time(s)
Am
plitu
de
(°)
Vibration of the flexible structure
2 4 6 8 10 12-0.8
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
Time(s)
Am
plitu
de
(°)
Vibration of the flexible structure
2.5 3 3.5
-0.1
0
0.1
Nominal case Nominal case non−Nominal case non−Nominal case
Coclusions
Signal shapers as an efficient tool for vibration compensation.
The new DZV shaper is presented as more robust alternatives than ZV shaper
Signal shapers for filtering reference command of BWB aircraft
Two laboratory experiments verification of DZV shaper are presented
FUTURE WORK- Signal shapers in feedback loop.
- Delay resonator, KONTAKT II LH12066
Thanks for attention
References
[1] Vyhlidal T., and Kucera V., (2012) Input shapers with uniformly distributed delays.accepted to TDS IFAC, Boston, 2012
[2] Vyhlidal T., and Kucera V.Signal shapers with distributed de-lays, spectral analysis and design, submited to Automatica 2012,
[3] Kucera V.,Hromcik M., (2011)Delay-Based input commandshapers: frequency properties and finite-dimensional alternatives, IFAC, Milan, 2011
….…………………………………..…More in articles ………………………….………….
Acknowledgement: The presented research has been supported by the Ministry of Education of the Czech Republic under program KONTAKT II LH12066, by the Grant Agency of Czech Technical University in Prague. Grant No. SGS11/150/OHK2/3T/12 and by EC project ACFA 2020-Active Control for Flexible 2020 Aircraft under No. 213321