+ All Categories
Home > Documents > PRIORITIZATION OF IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS IN ENERGY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

PRIORITIZATION OF IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS IN ENERGY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

Date post: 18-Nov-2023
Category:
Upload: independent
View: 0 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
22
PRIORITIZATION OF IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS IN ENERGY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Mohamed Salaheldin Ph.D Researcher Faculty of engineering, Alexandria University Alexandria, Egypt Prof. Dr. M. Nashat Fors Professor of industrial Engineering Faculty of engineering, Alexandria University Alexandria, Egypt Prof. Dr. Ahmed Farouk Abdul Moneim Professor of industrial Engineering Arab Academy of Science and Technology and Maritime Transport Alexandria, Egypt CIE45 Proceedings, 28-30October 2015, Metz / France
Transcript

PRIORITIZATION OF IMPROVEMENT PROJECTSIN ENERGY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

Mohamed SalaheldinPh.D Researcher

Faculty of engineering, Alexandria University

Alexandria, Egypt

Prof. Dr. M. Nashat ForsProfessor of industrial Engineering

Faculty of engineering, Alexandria University

Alexandria, Egypt

Prof. Dr. Ahmed Farouk Abdul MoneimProfessor of industrial Engineering

Arab Academy of Science and Technology and Maritime Transport

Alexandria, Egypt

CIE45 Proceedings, 28-30October 2015, Metz / France

Mohamed Salaheldin Biography• Mohamed Salaheldin, is Business Excellence Sector Manager at Sidpec; Sidi Kerir

Petrochemicals Co. and acting as Company Energy Manager.

• He is a PhD researcher, Production Engineering Department, AlexandriaUniversity, Egypt.

• He earned his M.Sc. in Industrial and Management Engineering 2008 from ArabAcademy for Science and Technology and Maritime Transport, Alexandria, Egypt.

• He earned his B.Sc. in Electrical Communication and Electro-Physics 1996 fromElectrical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering; Alexandria University.

• He has about 20 years of experience with background in oil & gas andpetrochemicals in multiple disciplines including automation maintenance andtechnical studies, quality improvement, and energy efficiency.

• He is certified Lean Six Sigma Black Belt.

• He has written or co-authored some articles on multi-criteria decision making.

• He is qualified by UNIDO as Energy Management System & ISO 50001 Expert.

10/30/2015 2

email: [email protected]: 002 01227426518

https://eg.linkedin.com/in/msalaheldin

Presentation Outlines

• EnMS Definition & Importance

• Improvement Project Prioritization in EnMS

• Multi-criteria Decision Making

• AHP & FAHP

• VFT

• FAHP-VFT

• Case-study

• Conclusion

10/30/2015Selection of Improvement Projects in EnMS

CIE45 Proceedings, 28-30October 2015, Metz / France3

Energy Management System (EnMS)

• EnMS is a systematic approach to improve energy performance by establishing an energy policy and specifying energy objectives along with providing the essential resources to achieve those objectives according to predetermined action plans.

10/30/2015Selection of Improvement Projects in EnMS

CIE45 Proceedings, 28-30October 2015, Metz / France4

From

ISO 50001:2011EnMS Standard

Importance of EnMS

• The implementation of EnMS has a great effect on enhancing the energy performance and lowering the green house gases (GHG) emission through basically no cost and low cost improvement projects

• EnMS became a very crucial issue especially in heavy industries like steel, oil and gas, and petrochemicals

• It is observed that there is a desire of many industrial companies in Egypt to have an EnMS to be implemented in their facilities and this is obviously the case of other countries of different categories.

10/30/2015Selection of Improvement Projects in EnMS

CIE45 Proceedings, 28-30October 2015, Metz / France5

Source: IEA/ UNIDO 2010

Most emissions reductions possible through deploy- mentof existing best available EE practices and technologies

Importance of EnMS

10/30/2015Selection of Improvement Projects in EnMS

CIE45 Proceedings, 28-30October 2015, Metz / France6

Climate Change Policy

Scenarios

Improvement Project Prioritization in EnMS

• To achieve specific objective, it is always accompanied by a list ofimprovement opportunities which is commonly implemented in aproject-base approach by cross-functional teams of differentdisciplines in the organization.

• Energy improvement projects are captured from ideas submitted byall stakeholders basically the employees to enhance the involvementof people and improvement culture.

10/30/2015Selection of Improvement Projects in EnMS

CIE45 Proceedings, 28-30October 2015, Metz / France7

Improvement Project Prioritization in EnMS

• The EnMS international standard ISO 50001:2011 stated that for anyorganization to grant a certified EnMS, an energy review has to bedeveloped.

• Energy review is a main part of the planning process for EnMS wherethe data of energy performance for any organization are collected andanalyzed to identify the significant energy uses and then energyperformance improvement opportunities have to be identified andprioritized.

• The implementation of energy management system (EnMS) createsan additional need for decision support system in order to prioritizethe improvement opportunities for energy efficiency to select themost appropriate ones to be handled first to maximize the gain andminimize the risk.10/30/2015

Selection of Improvement Projects in EnMS CIE45 Proceedings, 28-30October 2015, Metz / France

8

Complex Decision Problem

• Multiple Criteria (Qualitative & Quantitative)

• Multiple Decision Makers

• Uncertainty• Incomplete Information

• Imprecise Data

• Vagueness surrounding the decision making

10/30/2015Selection of Improvement Projects in EnMS

CIE45 Proceedings, 28-30October 2015, Metz / France8

Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process

• MCDM method

• AHP was developed by Saaty in the end of 70's

• Applied to many practical decision-making problems

10/30/2015Selection of Improvement Projects in EnMS

CIE45 Proceedings, 28-30October 2015, Metz / France9

Deriving Priorities Under Uncertainty

• DM may be uncertain about his level of preference due to incomplete information or insufficient knowledge

• Naturally, Humans express their preferences Linguistically

10/30/2015Selection of Improvement Projects in EnMS

CIE45 Proceedings, 28-30October 2015, Metz / France10

Linguistic Variables

• The most appropriate model that captures the characteristics of the Linguistic variables is Fuzzy Numbers rather than Definite (Crisp) Numbers as used by Saaty

• Therefore, the Modified Scale Replacing the 9-point scale of Saaty could be given as Follow:

10/30/2015Selection of Improvement Projects in EnMS

CIE45 Proceedings, 28-30October 2015, Metz / France11

E2Extremely

Important

Very

Strongly

Important

Moderately

Important

Nearly

Equal

Important

Moderately

Important

Very

Strongly

Important

Extremely

ImportantE1

Value-Focused Thinking (VFT)Ralph L. Keeney (1994) stated that VFT is designed to focus the decision maker on the essential activities that must occur prior to solve a decision problem

10/30/2015Selection of Improvement Projects in EnMS

CIE45 Proceedings, 28-30October 2015, Metz / France12

Sample VFT Hierarchy Sample AHP Hierarchy

From Dawley et al. 2008

VFT as a 10-step Process

10/30/2015Selection of Improvement Projects in EnMS

CIE45 Proceedings, 28-30October 2015, Metz / France13

From Jordan 2012

Natural Constructed

Direct Best Acceptable

Proxy Acceptable Least Desirable

𝑣 𝑥 = 𝑖=1𝑛 𝜆𝑖 𝑣𝑖 (𝑥𝑖)

Swing

Weighting

Fuzzy Analytic hierarchy Process – Value Focused Thinking (FAHP-VFT) Methodology

10/30/2015Selection of Improvement Projects in EnMS

CIE45 Proceedings, 28-30October 2015, Metz / France15

Value Hierarchy for the given problem

10/30/2015Selection of Improvement Projects in EnMS

CIE45 Proceedings, 28-30October 2015, Metz / France16

Some Measures with corresponding functions (𝜷=𝟓 for continuous functions)

10/30/2015Selection of Improvement Projects in EnMS

CIE45 Proceedings, 28-30October 2015, Metz / France17

Conclusion (1/2)

• It is a fact that energy management systems must cope with rising inenergy costs and reducing the impact on environment.

• The present paper proposes a methodology that helps makingdecisions in the selection of improving projects for energymanagement.

• The methodology is merging fuzzy analytic hierarchy process withvalue-focused thinking.

10/30/2015Selection of Improvement Projects in EnMS

CIE45 Proceedings, 28-30October 2015, Metz / France18

Conclusion (2/2)

• The proposed methodology is worth for the purpose of overcomingthe inaccuracy of FAHP when dealing with huge number ofalternatives and the uncertainty increasing when using otherweighting techniques with VFT.

• The new methodology is amenable for using in practice where self-explanatory method is required for practitioners and group decisionmaking that leading to consistent results.

• The Fuzzy Genetic Prioritization used to solve FAHP was used toovercome the drawbacks incurred when using the extent analysismethod of AHP where many multiplications and divisions of fuzzynumber may lead to inaccurate and sometimes irrational results.

10/30/2015Selection of Improvement Projects in EnMS

CIE45 Proceedings, 28-30October 2015, Metz / France19

Contribution of Current Work

1. Using linguistic pair-wise comparisons with value-focused thinking,for the first time.

2. Investigating the selection of Energy Management SystemImprovement projects and building a decision support tool capablefor dealing with that problem.

10/30/2015Selection of Improvement Projects in EnMS

CIE45 Proceedings, 28-30October 2015, Metz / France20

Regarding the Case Study

• For the given real case study, the weights of the objectives arecalculated based on 8 DM's judgements and 10 ideas are evaluatedand ranked according to their corresponding scores.

• In the stage of implementation and operation of EnMS, the newmethodology provides the flexibility of adding any new idea andcalculating a score for that new idea without incurring any rankreversal effect.

10/30/2015Selection of Improvement Projects in EnMS

CIE45 Proceedings, 28-30October 2015, Metz / France21

PRIORITIZATION OF IMPROVEMENT PROJECTSIN ENERGY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

For any further questions or clarifications, Kindly contact

Mohamed Salaheldin

CIE45 Proceedings, 28-30October 2015, Metz / France

THANK YOU

email: [email protected]: 002 01227426518

https://eg.linkedin.com/in/msalaheldin


Recommended